HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/10/13 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WED N ESDAY OCTOBER 13, 1999 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chamber
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman McNiel __ Vice Chairman Macias __
Com. Mannedno __ Com. Stewart __ Corn. Tolstoy __
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting of September 29, 1999
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice
their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman
and address the Commission by stating your name and address. A~ such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each projecL Please sign in after
speaking.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
15320 - MWH REALTY, LTD. - A subdivision of 6.99 acres of land into
2 parcels in the Industrial Park Development District (Subarea 6) and
Haven Avenue Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street -
APN: 209-401-01. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts forconsideration. (Continued from September
8, 1999) (THIS ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN)
B. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDTENTATIVETRACT15948-
REGENT HOMES, INC./BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC - A residential
subdivision of 40 single family lots on 9.75 acres of land in the Low
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the
Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Base Line
Road, 650 west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227-171- 003. Related
file: Tree Removal Permit 99-06. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
C. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDTENTATIVETRACT15947-
REGENT HOMES, INC. - A residenti.al subdivision of 31 single family
lots on 9.11 acres of land in Low Medium Residential District (4-8
dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at
the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road -
APN: 227-171-004. Related files: C,~nditional Use Permit 99-03 and
Tree Removal Permit 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-03 - REGENT HOMES, INC. - The
development of 31 single family lots on 9.11 acres of land in the Low-
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the
Etiwanda Specific Plan and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, located
at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road -
APN: 227-171-004. Related files: Tentative Tract 15947 and Tree
Removal Permit 99-06.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-40 - DAYBREAK PROPERTII-'S (AIRPORT CORPORATE
CENTER} - The development of two office buildings totaling 50,900
square feet and a 20,800 square foot health club building on 6.2 acres
of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of Archibald
Avenue and Fourth Street - APN: 210-062-13. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES -A request to change
the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land
from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located
between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald
Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: Industrial Area Specific
Plan (ISPA) 99-02, Development District Amendment (DDA) 99-03,
General Plan Amendment (GPA) 9~c,-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04,
GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-,::)2 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A
request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial
Page 2
" Area Specific Plan Map, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on
the west side of Archibald Avenue -APN: 210-062-31. Related files:
GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA
99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change
the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5
acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area
Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre),
located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of
Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A,
ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C,
ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels
totaling 0.7 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west
side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files:
GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA
99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific
Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between
Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue -
APN: 210-062-28and 34. Related files: GPA99-05A, ISPA99-02,
DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and
DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
K. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENTDISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels
totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west
side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files:
GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03,
GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Page 3
L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel
approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in
the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on
thewestsideofArchibaldAvenue-APN: 210-062-10. Related files:
GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99.-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03,
DDA 99-04, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN]' AND INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific
Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located
between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald
Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02,
DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-0:3, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and
DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
N. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENTDISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to change the Development District zoning designation for a single
parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea
16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets
on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related
files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA
99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Staff has prepared
a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
V. NEW BUSINESS
O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING - The proposed development of
an 88-bed, 59 suite, senior assisted living facility on 2.6 acres of land
in the Office Professional District, lotsted at 9515 and 9519 Base Line
Road - APN: 208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-018. Related
Files: Tree Removal Permit 99-30 and Pre-Application Review98-13.
Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
P. APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 - 99 CENTS
ONLY STORE - An appeal of the City Planner's conditions of approval
for a 99 Cents Only Store, a retail store within the Neighborhood
Commercial District, located at 9640 Base Line Road
APN: 202-161-40.
Page 4
VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place forthe general pub~c to address the Commission. Items
to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS
Q. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report
IX. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they sha~ be heard only
with the consent of the Commission.
I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on October 7, 1999, at least 72 hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code Section 54964. 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga.
Page 5
VICINITY MAP
......... · :;:::::::::::v...v,-... ............. · .............. .ve ::
i_1 I?i:i:i:i:i"'-'.'.'-'-' ..... :
,. gi::::::::iiiiii::::::::iii!!i::iiiiii~ii::~-~.~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I ~,,. ! I::iiii::iiiiiii::ii!~iiiii::iiiiiii::iiii~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: I::i::::::::::~.
I ""' .-.-....-..-.-..-.-............li~iii~ii2::~i~g i~::i::i::i=.
I
--~ ~ · r ~ r-~
~~1e ~ I I
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~IONCiA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRON1VIENTALASSESS1VIlgNTANDTENTATIVEpARCELMAp15320
- MWH REALTY, LTD - A subdivision of 7.06 acres of land into 2 parcels in the
Industrial Park Development District and Haven Avenue Overlay District, Subarea
6 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the northeast comer of Haven
Avenue and Acacia Street - APN: 209-401-01
BACKGRO~: At the request of the applicant, the above item was continued from September 8 to
October 13, 1999. The applicant now requests to formally withdraw the above item. Attached is his letter
of request.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no action by the Planning Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
Senior Civil Engineer
Dl:dlw
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's letter dated October 4, 1999
ITEM A
, 10/04/99 15:32 'g~626 441 5454 ~HITTIER TRUST ~0002/0002
~ Realty, Ltd.
1600 Huntington Drive
South Pasad,nn; CA 91030
626441-6111
October 4, 1999 Via FAX 909-477-2847
Mr. Dan James - Senior Civil Engineer
City of Rnncho Cucsmonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
R~nel'lfi CUcamns~a, CA 91729
R~: Ten~tive Parcel Map Application # 15320
Dea~ Mx. J~m~:
MHW Realty Ltd. CMIT~) hcreby requests the fonnal withdrawal of the above referenced application
and does not wish it to be on the agenda of the October 13, 1999 meeting of the CiV/of Rancho
Cucamonga ph,~nin_~ Commiisinn.
Thank you for your at~ntion to this mater. Please call me at 626-441- 511 l, extension 253 if yon have any
further questkms.
Sincezely,
Se~or ~ Esxato Office~
Co: Steve Anderson, 3ohn Walkins
Willie Valbuona - City ofRsac~o Cucamonga
CI'FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15948 - REGENT
HOMES, INC./BASELINE HOLDINGS,LLC -A residential subdivision of 40 single
family lots on 9.75 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of
Base Line Road, 650 feetwest of EtiwandaAvenue-APN: 227-171-003. Related
File: Tree Removal Permit 99-06.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: 4.1 dwelling units per acre
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning'
North Single family homes; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
South - Vacant land; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
East - Vacant land with development proposal; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre)
West Vacant land; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
C. General Plan Desi,qnations:
Project Site - Low-Medium Residential
North - Low-Medium Residential
South - Low-Medium Residential
East Low-Medium Residential
West Low-Medium Residential
D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the south side of Base Line Road, 650 feet
west of Etiwanda Avenue. It is vacant and gently slopes south at approximately 3.1 percent.
There are two Eucalyptus windrows, one in the center of the property containing 21 trees, and
a second containing 7 trees along southern boundary of the site.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The project site consists of 40 single family lots with a street access from Tentative
Tract 15947. A street stub-out is provided at the west side of the subdivision for connection
to the future development to the west. The lots proposed range from 7,330 to 9,145 square
.,
I TEN B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
']'r 15948 - REGENT HOMES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
feet, with an average lot size of 7,969 =square feet. The project is a subdivision map only with
no house plans being proposed at this time. The applicant intends to sell the lots to a builder.
The applicant has provided a master plan concept as shown in Exhibit "B," which includes the
easterly adjacent proposed subdivision (Tentative Tract15947) that is being considered by the
Planning Commission at this meeting. The master plan concept follows the current Victoria
Community Plan Land Use and Circulation Pattern because the status of the adjacent
development proposal known as Victoria Arbors (Tentative Tract15794) is uncertain at this
time.
B. Desi.qn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee ( McNeil, Stewart, Henderson)
reviewed the project on March 16,1999 (Exhibit "J"), and was generally satisfied with the
subdivision layout and recommended approval.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical and Grading Committees have reviewed the
project and recommended approval with the conditions listed in the attached Resolution of
Approval.
D. Tree Removal Permit 99-06: The project will require the removal of two Eucalyptus windrows.
An arbodsrs report has been prepared indicating that the Eucalyptus trees are deceased
and/or decayed. The arborist recomrnends the removal of the deceased or decaying trees
with replacement. A condition of approval for the Tentative Tract and the Tree Removal
Permit has been placed requiring a new windrow to be planted in the rear of the lots that
backup to Base Line Road.
E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has prepared Part I of the Initial Study. Staff has
completed Part I1 of the Initial Study and determined that the site is impacted by noise, air
quality, and traffic. The applicant has prepared detailed reports and made plan revisions to
address the environmental issues as follows:
1. Noise Impacts: The projecrs northern boundary borders Base Line Road. A noise
study was prepared for the project to determine the noise exposure and potential
mitigation measures for the development of the site. The study indicates that increased
dwelling setbacks or providing a 6-foot high sound barrier will be needed to protect
Lots I through 10.
2. Traffic Impacts: A traffic study was prepared for the project to determine the impacts
associated with additional traffic and the subsequent mitigation measures needed. The
study recommended that the applicant fully improve Base Line Road, pay a fair share
of transportation fees, and modify the traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line
Road.
3. Air Quality: The development of the site will have short term air quality impact because
of construction. The mitigation listed in the Initial Study Part II and the Resolution of
Approval will reduce the short ten'n impact to a less than significant level.
4. Bioloqical Resources: The development of the site will remove two windrows as stated
in the section of the report under Tree Removal Permit 99-06. The replacement
windrows will reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Tentative Tract 15948
October 13, 1999
Page 3
With the mitigation measures and the conditions of approval in-place, the development of the
site will not have a significant impact to the environment and staff recommends the issuance
of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan
B. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the Victoria
Community Plan in which the site is located.
C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development
Code and the Victoria Community Plan.
D. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, orwelfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site,
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract
15948 and Tree Removal Permit 99-06 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval
with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Respectfull ubmitted,
City Planner
BB:WM:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Concept
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Tree Location Plan
Exhibit "F" - Sections at South Property Boundary
Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Part II
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Comments dated March 16, 1999
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
" ~ JL JL J l
', II
TRACT NO. 15948 _ I ~ ~1/-
_ ' .. , ~ ~,~
,, ~ ~.
',~..... -,~
',, X.... ....
':., ~ '-. ,:, ':, ...... , "'~.,;:... ,. .--.:.-~ ,~-,. ,:: f ', .,-., ..~
--
~ BO~jN~ARF
.!
RETAINING
WALL
(4° HEIGHT MAX,)
E)(ISTING
GRADE
6~(TH ~),tA CF-t.~
6' VIsta/FENCE
WITH GATE
WALL
(~' H~/GHr MAX,)
.~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga
: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: TENTATIVE TRACT 15948
2. Related Files: Preliminary Review 98-13
Tree Removal Permit 99-06
3. Description of Project: A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on 10 acres of
land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria
Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road
- APN: 227-171- 003.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Regent Homes, Inc./Baseline Holdings, LLC
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite C-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria
Community Plan.
6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North of the site is dl~veloped with single family
residences. The property to the east, south, and west of the site is vacant. Two
Eucalyptus windrows exist within the site, one along the south property boundary and one
at the middle of the site. r
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Nancy Fong, AICP
Senior Planner
(909) 477-2750
EXHIBIT "G"
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Page ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning (v') Transportation/Circulation (v') Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (./) Biological Resources (~') Utilities and Service Systems
(~) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (V') Aesthetics
i (./) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
i ( ) Air Quality (v~)Noise (~/) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(v') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
/.~la . '," C}~ Prepared by:
AS~!r~~~~ Warren Moreli~n
Assistant Planner
August 2, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa,ge 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
S~gnificanl
Irapat1 Less
otentially Unless Than
issues and Supoorling Informa~on Sources: ignificanl Mitigation igni~cant
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.'
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) (,/)
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( )
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Significant
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( )
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 4
Significant
Impacl Less
Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ( ) (
d) Seiche hazards? ( ( ) ( (~/)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ( ) ((v')
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
I) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is
currently vacant. Grading of the site will be done under supervision of a licensed
Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor. The impact is not considered significant.
h) The General Plan indicates the Tujunga-Delhi soil association for the site which
"may have soil bearing capacities that could limit some development. Structures
proposed on this soil type should be permitted only after a site specific investigation
has been prepared that indicates that the soil can adequately support the weight of
the structure." A soils report will be required by the Building and Safety Division
prior to issuance of building permits. The impact is not considered significant.
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ( ) (e/) ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ( ) ( )
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( )
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 5
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( )
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( )
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( )
I) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
Comments:
a) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate
and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof
tops proposed on the currently vacant site. The developer will be required to
channel the surface runoff from the project to the existing basin south of Victoda
Park Lane to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The impact is not considered
significant.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the propo.,;al.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) (~') ( ) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (e/) ( ) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moistun;, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate!? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a/b) The short and long term air quality impacts were addressed in the Previous EIR
certified for the Victory Community Plan. Typically, construction of a project this
size will exceed SCAQMD thresholds dudng grading activities for PM~0 and NOx,
and may also exceed SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational
impacts) for NO.. The proposed project represents only a fraction of the total
emissions of NOx in the county; therefore, this impact is less than significant. The
following mitigation measures will be required to reduce short term
construction impacts to less-than significant level:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 6
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractorshall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended; thereby, decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, ortransportation
of cut and fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after
each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks orsprinkler systems shall be used
to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust
from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting
down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed
for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, orexcavation is completed; the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup
of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut and fill materials, and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarpeal from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural color building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating,
and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency,
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Page 7
such as high volumE! low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual
coating applications :such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula,
dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (V') ( ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( (V')
c) inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a) The project will generate additional tdps due to the new construction. A Traffic
Impact Analysis was prepared for the project by LSA Associates on December 8,
1998. The report concluded that the project will generate 679 daily tdps, including
53 a.m. peak hour trips and 72 p.m. peak hour trips. All intersections will operate
with satisfactory levels of service with the exception of LOS F at the 1-15 south-
bound Ramp/Base Line Road intersection. As mitigation, the developer will be
required to do the following:
1) ThedevelopershallfullyimproveBaseLineRoadinaccordancewithCity
standards.
2) The developer shall pay transportation development fees upon issuance
of building permits, at a rate adopted by the City.
3) The traffic signal at I-'tiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road shall be
modified as necessary to accommodate the increase in traffic due to the
construction of the proposed project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pacje 8
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ] (~,,,)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? (~] ( ]
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? (~)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, ripadan, and
vernal pool)? (~,)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (~)
Comments:
a) Because Tentative Tract 15948 does not contain suitable habitat for any sensitive
species, no project impacts are expected to occur.
b) Two Eucalyptus windrows exist in the middle of the site and along the south
property boundary. An Arbodst Report was prepared to evaluate the trees. The
Arborist stated that the Silver Maple tree and one of the Palm trees are in poor
health and should be removed and replaced. The Eucalyptus windrows are in
declining health and most of the trees are diseased with the Boral Beetle. The
Arborist recommended removal of the windrows with replacement. The trees are
considered "heritage trees" and are subject to the City's Tree preservation
Ordinance (RCMC 19.08). The following mitigation measures are required for
the project:
1 ) Replacement of the two existing Eucalyptus windrows with one along the
north property boundary, subject to City Planner review and approval.
2) Authorization from property owner to the south is required to remove any
trees within his/her site.
3} Follow the preservation requirement listed on page 7 of the Arborist
Report dated December 14, 1998.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Page 9
Issues and Suppomng Informalion Sources: ilgf~qc~nt I ' ilgr~(~nt I~N~
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?. ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A dsk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result irl:
a) increases in existin9 noise IE;vels? ( ( ) (v') (
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( (v') ( ) (
Comments:
a) The project would increase noise levels since the site m currently vacant and the
development would add people and traffic to the area. The impact is not considered
significant.
J
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 10
b) The project is impacted by road noise from Base Line Road, a major arterial. A
Noise Study was prepared by LSA Associates to determined the level of impacts
and the mitigation. Project related long-term vehiculartrip increases are anticipated
to be moderate. The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than
significant. No significant traffic noise impacts on off-site sensitive uses am
anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would be potentially
exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the 60 dBA Ldn standard in outdoor
activity areas. Following are mitigation measures for the project:
1) The developer will be required to incorporate setbacks and/or sound
barriers that protect outdoor activities.
2) Mechanical ventilation will be required to ensure that windows can
remain closed and still achieve the interior noise standard.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
c) The Etiwanda School Distdct and the Chaffey Joint High School Distdct serve the
project. Both school distdcts have been notified regarding the proposed
development. With mitigation, the impact to the School Districts is not
considered significant. A condition of approval will require the developer of
the tracts to pay school impact fees.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 11
iOnif. cant! ! ' 'edigni~cant
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (v') 0 ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( )
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
e) The project will increase dernand upon storm drain systems due to the increased
runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site,
With required mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. The
developer will be required to construct a drainage solution to channel the
surface runoff from the project to the existing basin south of Victoria Park
Lane.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
Comments:
c) New light and glare will be created since the site is currently vacant. The impact is
no greater than other existing residential developments in the City.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) (
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( (V')
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Perle 1 ?
Significant
SiOni~can~Mitigationilgn~nacc~nlNn~o
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? ) ( ) ( ) (V)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ) ( ) ( ) (V)
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
Comments:
a) The impact is not considered significant. The developer of the project will be
required to pay park development fees as a standard condition of approval.
16. M.,od~IDATORy FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ) (v')
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15948 Pa~le 13
4;
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ( ) (v')
EARLIER ANALYSES
Eadier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all
that apply):
General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(V') Master Environmental Assessment for the1989 General plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(v') Victoria Planned Community EIR
(Certified May 20, 1981)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would
OCCUr,
Signate" Date: ~/__~_____~'
Print Name and Title: F"'((r--~~'~)-'--~I('-~ 1F:~,~-,~c.-r I/lZLZ:~ ~
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Nancy FongNVarren Morelion March 16, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15948 - REGENT HOMES,
INCJBASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC -A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on 10 acres of land
in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan,
located at the south side of Base Line Road, approximately 650 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN:
227-171-003
Desicln Parameters: The site is vacant and slopes southeasterly at approximately 5 percent. In the
middle of the site there exist 20 Eucalyptus trees. A Eucalyptus windrow exists along the south
property boundary. An arborist's report has been prepared indicating that many of the Eucalyptus
trees are deceased and/or decayed and should be removed and replaced.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding
this project:
1. There are no major issues associated with the project.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. The developer should provide a windrow along the project's northern sloped area for
replacement of the proposed removal of the Eucalyptus trees.
Staff Recommendation: Staffrecommends that the Design Review Committee to approve the project
subject to the above recommended modification.
Desi.qn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Nancy FongNVarren Morelion
The Committee recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide a windrow along the project's northern sloped area forthe replacement of the proposed
removal of Eucalyptus trees.
EXHIBIT "H"
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15948 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999
Project Name: Regent Homes Project Applicant: Regent Homes,
Base Line Holdings LLC
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite C-1
Costa Mesa. CA 92626
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue
and Base Line Road -APN: 227-171- 003.
Project Description: A residential subdivision of 40 single family lots on 10 acres of land in the
Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community
Plan.
FBNDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding ate included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 13, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
Base Map Source: Eagle Aerial Photography, April 23, 1996.
~2/s/gs<~Hs3o~o> Figure 3
LSA ~~" Regent Homes
o 500. ~ooo. ~o~,_.%' Vegetation Map
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT 15cJ48
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project.
This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation
measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action
and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City
in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the projel:t file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the
following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed
oft as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the
MMP Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or
additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible
City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
h~PLANNING\WARREN\tt\TT15948mmp.wpd
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15948 Applicant: Reaent Homes, Inc./Baseline Holdin.q, LLC
Initial Study Prepared by:~ Date:
Air Quality
Construction equipment onsite shall be based on low CP/BO ! C As necessary Applicant 2, 3, 4
emissions factors and high-energy efficiency. will submit
proof at
plan check
Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment in- CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
lieu of gasoline-powered engines shall be done will submit
where feasible. ~roof at
~!en check
Construction grading plans shall include a statement CP/BO B As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
that work crews will shut off equipment when not in will submit
.~ use. )roof at
c:X ~lan check
Ride-share and transit incentives shall be CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
encouraged for construction crews. will submit
)roof at
)lan check
Dust generated by the development activities shall be CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
retained on-site and kept to a minimum. will submit
~roof at
~lan check
Pre-coated natural color building materials. water- CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
based or low VOC coating, and coating transfer or will submit
spray equipment with high transfer efficiency shall be proof at
used. ;~lan check
TransportatlonlCIrculatlon ~ , '
Fully improve Base Line Road in accordance to City CE D As necessary C/A 3.4
Standards.
MIT MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATI 5948 Page 2
Transportation development fees shall be paid upon CE B As necessary C/A 3.4
issuance of building permits
Traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line CE D As necessary C/A 3,4
Road shall be modified as necessary to
accommodate an increase in traffic due to
construction.
BIological Resources
Preserve two palm trees by relocation CP C As necessary C/A 2.3,4
Replace two existing Eucalyptus windrow with one CP D As necessary C/A 2,3,4
along the north property boundary.
Follow preservation requirement listed on page 7 of CP B As necessary C/A 2,3.4
the December 14, 1999 Arborist Report.
Noise
Incorporate setbacks and/or sound barriers that CP/BO C As necessary C/A 3
protect outdoor activities.
Install mechanical ventilation to ensure that windows CP/BO C As necessary C/A 3
can remain closed and still achieve the interior noise
standard.
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions
CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVI NG TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 15948, A SUBDIVISION OF 40 LOTS ON 9.75 ACRES OF LAND IN
THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE
ROAD 650 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-171-003.
A. Recitals.
1. Regent Homes/Baseline Holdings, LLC has filed an application for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 15948, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudrig the above~
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Base Line Road
650 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 655 feet and lot depth
of approximately 660 feet; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site has been developed with single family
homes, the property to the east has a 31 lot subdivision proposed, and the property to the west and
south is vacant; and
c. The subdivision design, lot sizes and dimensions are consistent with the Low-
Medium District of the Victoria Community Plan; and
d. The development of the site will require the removal of two Eucalyptus windrows.
A condition of approval has been placed requiring a new windrow to be planted in the rear of the
lots that backup to Base Line Road; and
e. Mitigation measures for noise, air quality and traffic impacts are placed in the
conditions of approval for this project.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and Victoria Community Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and Victoria Community Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the prowsions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declar~ation for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'l'r 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Planninq Division
1 ) A row of windrow consisting of 15-gallon size Eucalyptus Maculata and
planted at 10 feet on center shall be provided along the north side of
the site for the tier of lots that back up to Base Line Road, subject to
City Planner review and approval.
2) Tree Removal Permit 99-06 is approved for the removal of the existing
6 Eucalyptus trees along the south property boundary and the row of
Eucalyptus at the middle of the site. The applicant/developer shall
obtain authorization from the southerly adjacent property owner for the
trees that are at south property line. The approval is valid for 90 days
after the issuance of building and/or grading permits.
3) The applicant/developer shall in good faith work with the southerly
adjacent property owner to obtain authorization forthe removal of trees
at the shared property line and the overall property boundary grading
for interfacing. If the applicant/developer can not obtain authorization
from the southerly adjacent property owner, the south property
boundary perimeterwall shall include terracing walls, offsetting of walls
around existing trees, and/or a combination of them or other
acceptable techniques, subject to City Planner review and approval,
prior to issuance of any permit. The design and material of the wall
shall be subject to City Planner review and approval.
3) Perimeter wall along Base Line Road shall be decorative with a cap
subject to City Planner review and approval.
Engineering Division
1) The developer shall provide a Drainage Acceptance Agreement
executed by the owner of the property to the west or prepare an
alignment study, acquire right-of-way and construct a master planned
storm drain from Day Creek Channel to Tentative Tract 15948. In the
event the developer provides for neither of the options listed and
installation of the master planned storm drain is completed by others,
prior to this site developing, then this development shall participate in
a fair share cost distribution of the storm drain facilities.
2) In the event the developer provides an executed Drainage Acceptance
Agreement, an interim drainage solution shall be designed to channel
the surface runoff from the project to the existing basin south of
Victoria Park Lane to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3) Base Line Road shall be improved from Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda
Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements
shall include but not be limited to pavement, curb, and gutter. The
developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'Fr 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 4
property interests necessary to construct the required public
improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final Map for approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to
Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the
property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement
shall provide for payment hy the developer of all costs incurred by the
City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with
the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the
form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the developer at the developers cost. The appraiser shall
be approved by the City, prior to commencement of the appraisal. The
developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the
cost of permanent off-site improvements from future development of
the off-site properties fronting Base Line Road. If the developer fails
to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the
public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the
developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
4) An emergency access shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and Fire Marshall in the location proposed. In the event the
developer cannot acquire the off-site emergency access as proposed,
an alternate access throughout Lot I may be provided.
5) A fee for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the Base Line Road
median island landscaping installed by Tentative Tract 15732 shall be
paid, prior to the issuance of building permits. The amount indicated
on the approved reimbursement agreement is $15,668.00 plus any
interest due at the time of payment per City Council Resolution No.
97-03.
6) The lettered lot on the south side of Base Line Road shall mirror the
treatment on the north side of Base Line Road, a minimum of 10 feet
wide and a maximum of 12 feet wide.
7) The traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line
Road shall be modified, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8) The local street, along the westerly boundary, shall be dedicated and
fully improved, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In the event the
developer cannot acquire 'the off-site right-of-way to construct the
street as proposed, a 40-foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for
construction of a portion of the street within the project boundary.
9) The primary access shall be constructed curb-to-curb with street lights
installed either through Tentative Tract 15974 or Tentative Tract 15947
to the satisfaction of City Engineer.
10) The emergency access shall be constructed, to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. A deposit shall be placed to provide for the removal of
the emergency facilities.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 5
11) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously under grounded
overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the
66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Base Line Road shall be paid
to the City, prior to the issuance of building permits, The fee shall be
one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the east
project boundary to the westerly limit of under grounding completed by
Tentative Tract 15732.
12) TheapplicantshallreimbursetheCityforthecostoftheirproportionate
frontage of the Base Line Road widening and median construction and
rights-of-way purchase for both Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue
in accordance with Resolution No. 90-051.
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
Air Quality
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use. Dudng smog season (May through October), the overall
length of the construction period should be extended; thereby,
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut and fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and
to create a crust after each day's activities cease.
b. Dudng construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 6
c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, orexcavation is completed;
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed
so that dust generation will not occur.
d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut and fill materials, and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural color building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or
manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel,
spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Biological Resources
1 ) Preservation of two healthy palm trees by relocating them to the corner
of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
2) A replacement windrow consisting of 15-gallon size Eucalyptus
Maculata planted at 10 feet on-center along the north property
boundary, subject to City Planner review and approval.
3) Follow the preservation requirement listed on page 7 of the Arborist
Report dated Decera ber 14, 1998.
Transportation
1) The developer shall fully improve Base Line Road and Etiwanda
Avenue in accordance with City standards.
2) The developer shall pay transportation development fees upon
issuance of building permits at a rate adopted by the City.
3) The traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road shall be
modified as necessary to accommodate the increase in traffic due to
the construction of the proposed project.
Noise
1) Increase dwelling setbacks or provide a six-foot high sound wall to
protect Lots I through 10 shall be required.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15948 - REGENT HOMES/BASELINE HOLDINGS, LLC
October 13, 1999
Page 7
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T, McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 15948
SUBJECT: 40 square foot lot subdivision
APPLICANT: Reqen Homes, Inc./Baseline Holdinqs LLC
LOCATION: South side of Base Line Road, 650 fset west of Etiwanda Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Appreval or City Planners letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or appreved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Project No. TT 15948
Completion Date
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4, Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
9. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs.
10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all
lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice
requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of
construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
14. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two ~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high
,Completion Date
winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall
extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above gracte.
15. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / /
16. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link / /
to maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
17. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. / /
18. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. __/ /
19. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be / /
manufactured products.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street.
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting raquirad by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-
gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted
in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section
shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall b~; subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
5.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
F. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
Project No TT15948
Completion Date
appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required
to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forteit.
in those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),
the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior
to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identity the reporter as an individual
qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
1. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
2. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable cedes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant
shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit
issuance.
3.Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
Project No. ~1' 15948
Completion Date
J. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a
California Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal
encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or
tentative map. Privateeasementsfornon-publicfacilities(cross-lotdrainage, local feedertrails,
etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centedine):
60 total feet on Base Line Road
3. Comer property fine cutoffs shaft be dedicated per City Standards.
4. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for
approved openings: Base Line Road.
5.All existing easements lying within future ri!;]hts-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on
the final map.
6. Additional street right-of-way shaft be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
L. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos,
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City
Standards. interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,
AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
Project No. ~ 15948
Completion Date
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __/__
Curb & A.C, Side- Ddve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trai]
Base Line Road X X X × x (f) (g)
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (f) Class II bike Lane, (g) Post R26(s).
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety /
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and appreved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and __/__ __
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or __/____
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City __/__
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __/__
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/__
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. StreetnamesshallbeapprovedbytheCityPlannerpriortosubmittalforfirstplancheck. ~/~
sc -a~2s~ 6
Project No TT 15948
CompleUon Date
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with /
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
M. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape
Maintenance Distdct: Base Line Road parkway.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble /
or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/__
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first, Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following streE:t(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road.
N. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
O. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by t:he water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
P. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to thE: City, covering the estimated operating costs for __ / /
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
Project No. TT15948
Completion Date
PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
eR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Q, General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,
and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
2. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto water plan approval. Required hydrants,
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
3. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to
final inspection.
4. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32.
5. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus.
6. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and
clear of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District
requirements.
7.Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows:
$132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
**Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
8. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC,
UFC, UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COM PLIAN CE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
R, Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are
within 40 inches of any locking device. tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be
used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be
lifted from frame or track in any manner.
Project No TF 15949
Completion Date
T, Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / /
visibility.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ,_ :> .~
STAFF RF, PORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15947 - REGENT
HOMES, INC. - A residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 9.11 acres of
land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the
Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and
Base Line Road -APN: 227-171-004. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit 99-03,
Tree Removal Permit 99-05.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-03 - REGENT HOMES, INC. - The development
of 31 single family lots on 9.11 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the
southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 227-171-004.
Related Files: Tentative Tract 15947, Tree Removal Permit 99-05.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Proiect Density: 3.4 dwelling units per acre.
B. Surroundin,q Land Use and Zoning:
North Single family homes; Community Service
South - Vacant land; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
East Vacant land; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
West Vacant land with development proposal; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre)
C. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Low-Medium Residential
North Community Service
South - Low-Medium Residential
East Low-Medium Residential
West Low-Medium Residential
D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road
and Etiwanda Avenue. It is vacant and gently slopes southeast at approximately 2.4 percent.
A eucalyptus windrow containing seven trees is located along the southern boundary of the
site. Three palm trees and one maple tree exist on the northeast corner of the site.
ITENS C S ~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
'IF 15947 AND CUP 99-03
October 13, 1999
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
A. Genera!: The project site consists of 31 single family lots with a single street access to
Etiwanda Avenue. The lots proposed range from 8,307 to 15,924 square feet~ with an
average lot size of 10,065 square feet, which are considerably larger than typical Low-Medium
residential lots in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area. The project is a subdivision map only, with
no house plans being proposed at this time. The applicant intends to sell the lots to a builder.
The applicant has provided a master plan concept as shown in Exhibit "B," which included the
westerly proposed subdivision (TT15948) that is being considered by the Planning
Commission at this meeting. The master plan concept follows the current Victoria Community
Plan Land Use and Circulation pattern because the status of the adjacent development
proposal known as the "Victoria Arbors" ('Fr15794) is uncertain at this time.
B. Conditional Use Permit 99-03 - Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distrir, t: The project is in the
Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District which requires a Conditional Use Permit to ensure that
development along Etiwanda Avenue is consistent with the historical character and quality of
the street. There are special development criteria in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District,
which require homes along Etiwanda Avenue to face the street, maintain a minimum
separation of 25 feet between homes, and provide special streetscape design. The applicant
has provided conceptual drawings of house plotting for the lots along Etiwanda Avenue that
addressed the special requirements as shown in Exhibits "G" and "H."
C. Desi,qn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Stewart~ Henderson)
reviewed the project on March '16,1999 (Exhibit "J"), and was generally satisfied with the
subdivision layout. However, the Committee directed the applicant to address the special
development criteria in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. On July 6, 1999, the Design
Review Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the concepts of front-on house plotting
and streetscape design and subsequently, recommended approval (Exhibits "G" and "H").
D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Committee has reviewed the project and
recommended approval with the conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. The
Grading Committee has recommended approval with the condition that the applicant
continues to work with the southerly adjacent property owner for property boundary interfaces,
specifically reducing the 9-foot high combination of retaining and perimeter block wall, and the
removal of the eucalyptus trees along the south property boundary. The applicant stated that
they have contacted the southerly property owner to work on a solution; however, the owner
has not responded. Staff has contacted the southerly property owner to explain the property
boundary interface issue. The owner stated that she is not interested but may think about it
in the future. Exhibit "F" presents the preferred solution that could be achieved with
cooperation and authorization from the southerly adjacent property owner and an optional
solution which could be implemented without her authorization.
E. Tree Removal Permit 99-05: The project will require the removal of a row of seven eucalyptus
trees, a maple tree, a palm tree, and the relocation of two palm trees. The row of eucalyptus
trees is right along the property boundary. An Arborist's Report has been prepared indicating
that a palm tree, the maple tree and the eucalyptus trees are deceased and/or decaying. The
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
'IF 15947 AND CUP 99-03
October 13, 1999
Page 3
arborist recommends the removal of the deceased or decaying trees with replacements. Also,
to preserve the two healthy palm trees, the arborist recommended maintainin9 them in place
or relocating them to a more suitable site. A condition of approval for the Tentative Tract and
the Tree Removal Permit has been placed requiring a new windrow to be planted in the rear
of the lots that backup to Base Line Road, and the relocation of the two palm trees to be
planted as a special treatment at the corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
F. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has prepared Pad I of the Initial Study. Staff has
completed Part II of the Initial Study and determined that the site is impacted by noise and
traffic. The applicant has prepared detailed reports and made plan revisions to address the
environmental issues as follows:
1. Noise Impacts: The project's northern boundar~ borders Base Line Road. A noise
study was prepared for the project to determine the noise exposure and potential
mitigation measures for the development of the site. The study indicates that increasing
dwelling setbacks or providing a 6-foot high sound barrier will be needed to protect Lots
12 through 19. The study also stated that mechanical ventilation, such as air-
conditioning, will be required for Lots 1, 11, 12, and 25 through 31. These
recommendations are placed as mitigation in the Resolution of Approval.
2. Traffic Impacts: A traffic study was prepared for the project to determine the impacts
associated with additional traffic and the mitigation measures. The study recommended
as mitigation that the applicant fully improve Base Line Road, pay a fair share of
transportation fees, and modify the traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line
Road.
3. Air Quality: The development of the site will have short-term air quality impact because
of construction. The mitigation listed in the Initial Study Part II and the Resolution of
Approval will reduce the short-term impact to less than significant levels.
4. Bioloqical Resources: The development of the site will remove a windrow of eucalyptus
(seven trees), a palm tree, and a maple tree as stated in the section of the report under
Tree Removal Permit 99-05. The replacement windrows and the preservation of two
palm trees will reduce the impact to a less than significant.
With the mitigation measures and conditions of approval in place, the development of the site
will not have a significant impact to the environment, and staff recommends the issuance of
a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
B. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda
Specific Plan in which the site is located.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
'IF 15947 AND CUP 99-03
October 13, 1999
Page 4
C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development
Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
D. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare or rnaterially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract
15947, Conditional Use Permit 99-03, and Tree Removal Permit 99-05 throu9h the adoption of the
attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environment Impacts.
City Planner
BB:WM:NF\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Concept
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Tree Location Plan
Exhibit "F" - Sections at South Property Boundary
Exhibit "G" - House Plotting Plan Along Etiwanda Avenue
Exhibit "H" - Streetscape Plan Along Etiwanda Avenue
Exhibit "1" - Initial Study Part II and Mitigated Negative Declaration
Exhibit "J" - Design Review Comments for March 16, 1999 and July 6, 1999
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 15947and Tree Removal Permit 99-05
Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 99-03
~~~ SITE U~LIZATION MAP
SING E FA~IL ~
TEN TA TIVE
TRACT NO. 159,I7 - - '
"""' -_~.-;_:-3: :""'~""' ......
) I.: I / · , ., ,, ' .....
'"J"' ' .!' ........
' I
· ',~ .., ..,,..
; ~ '. I ~ ~i~',,~._.~....
.......,~... :~-~ ,,.
:' ~' ::' ~::' CANT"' ' ' :" '.":~ ~
· ' :' :, ' ~ " ! ~ i "' :'~....~~'
' ". ' ' " .... , . ~' z .....
......
· ,, ~ .-: ~], -, .~ .-..~.~
y~ EXISllNG TREE EXHIBIT
× TIeACT NO. 15947 ~ 15948
· .. ~
'
.............
....
,!
RETAINING
(4' HEIGHT MAX.)
-- --~ "' """ ""' ~ EXISTING
~ GRADE
TRACT ~ . 6' VIEW FENCE
· WITH GATE
~ UNDARY '
^
R~'TAININC :
WALl
" ' ~ EXISTING
TEN TA TI VE
TRACT NO. 75~7
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
E~ """' '
$4..
3
ETI~IANDA AVENUE EXHIBIT-BUS lANE
Ill
~ ~, AVENUE
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
ETIWANDA AVENUE EXIHIBIT
TENTATIVE TRACT # 15947 ,-;:::':
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: TENTATIVE TRACT/VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15947
2. Related Files: Preliminary Review 98-13
Conditional Use Permit 99-03
Tree Removal Permit 99-05
3. Description of Project: A residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 10 acres of
land in Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road -
APN: 227-171-004.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Regent Homes Corporation
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite C -1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan.
6. Zoning: Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North of the site is developed with single family
residences. The property to the south, east, and west of the site is vacant. Three mature
Palm trees and one mature Silver Maple exist at the comer of Etiwand~l Avenue and Base
Line Road. A Eucalyptus windrow, which is in declining health, exists along the south
property boundary.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Ddve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Nancy Fong, AICP
Senior Planner
(909) 477-2750
EXHIBIT "1"
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning (~') Transportation/Circulation (~/) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (v') Biological Resources (t/) Utilities and Service Systems
(t/) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (~') Aesthetics
(~') Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
( ) Air Quality (,I) Noise (v') Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(V') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
· ' ' e imposed upon the proposed project.
'Na~.cy Fon ICP Warren Morelion
Assistant Planner
August 2, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) (~')
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) (V')
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) (~')
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t,,')
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Pa,~e 4
Issues and Suppodjng Information Sources: Significant
Impact Less
Polentially Unless Than
ignificarlt Mi[igslirjrl il%fllacc~nt ~N~
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) (
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (V) ( )
I) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is
currently vacant. Grading of the site will be done under supervision of a licensed
Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor. The impact is not considered significant.
h) The General Plan indicates the Tujunga-Delhi soil association for the site which
"may have soil bearing capacities that could limit some development. Structures
proposed on this soil type should be permitted only after a site specific investigation
has been prepared that indicates that the soil can adequately support the weight of
the structure." A soils report will be required by the Building and Safety Division
pdor to issuance of building permits. The impact is not considered significant.
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns.
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) (V) ( )
b) Exposure of people or properly to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( (v')
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( (v')
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 5
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
~ Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( )
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) (~)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) (~)
I) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater othe~ise available for public water
supplies? ( ) (f)
Commen~:
g) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pa~erns, and the rate
and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof
tops proposed on the currently vacant site. The developer will be required to
channel the surface runoff from the project to the existing basin south of Victoria
Park Lane to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The impa~ is not considered
significant.
5. AIR QUALI~. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) (f) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (f) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ) (~)
d) Create obje~ionable odors? ( ) ) (~)
Commen~:
a & b) The sho~ and long term air quality impacts were addressed in the previous EIR
~ified for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Typically, construction of a project this
size will exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading a~ivities for PM~0 and NO.,
and may also exceed SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational
impacts) for NO.. The proposed project represents only a fraction of the total
emissions of NO. in the county; therefore, this impact is less than significant.
The following mitigation measures will be required to reduce shoff te~
construction impac~ to less-than significant level:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 6
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment
used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended; thereby, decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing
and transit incentives for construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation
of cut and fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after
each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used
to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust
from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting
down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed
for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup
of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut and fill materials, and/or
construction debris to orfrom the site shall be tarped from the point
of origin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural color building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating,
and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency,
such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual
initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 7
coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula,
dauber, rag, or sponge.
6. T~NSPORTATIONICIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (f) ( ) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp cu~es or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( )
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
~ Conflicts with adopted policies supposing
alternative transpo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a) The project will generate additional trips due to the new construction. A Traffic
Impact Analysis was prepared for the project by LSA Associates on De~mber 8,
1998. The repo~ concluded that the proje~ will generate 679 daily trips, including
53 a.m. peak hour trips and 72 p.m. peak hour trips. All intemections will operate
with satisfacto~ levels of se~ice with the exception of Level of Se~ice (LOS) F at
the I-15 South-bound Ramp/Base Line Road intersection. As mitigation for the
project, the developer will be required to do the following:
1) The developer shall fully improve Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue
in accordance with Ci~ s~ndards.
2) The developer shall pay transportion development fees upon issuance
of building pe~i~, at a rate adopted by the Ci~.
3) The traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road shall be
modified as necessa~ to accommodate the increase in traffic due to the
construction of the proposed project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page
Signalcant
Impact Less
Potenlially Unless Than
issues and SupSoiling Information Sources: Si nt Si
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or mm species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) (f) ( ) ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) (~)
e) ~ldlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( )
Commen~:
a) Because Tentative Tract 15947 does not contain suitable habitat for any sensitive
species, no project impacts am expected to occur.
b) There am 3 mature Palm Trees and one Silver Maple trees at the corner of Base
Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, and a Eucalyptus windrow along the south
prope~y bounda~. An A~orist Repo~ was prepared to evaluate the trees. The
Arbodst stated that the Silver Maple tree and one of the Palm trees am in poor
health and should be removed and mpla~d. The Eucalyptus windrow is in declining
health and most of the trees am diseased with the Boml Beetle. The Arbodst
recommended ramoval of the windrows with replacement. The trees am considered
"heritage trees" and am subje~ to the City's Tree pmse~ation Ordinance (RCMC
19.08). The following mitigation measures am required for the project:
1 ) Relocation of ~o of the Palm trees to an area that will not conflict with
subdivision design.
2) Replacement of the existing Eucalyptus windrow with one along the noffh
prope~ bounda~, subject to Ci~ Planner review and approval.
3) Authorization from the prope~ owner to the south is required to remove
any trees within his/her site.
4) Follow the prese~ation requirement listed on page 7 of the Arborist
Repo~ dated December 14, 1998.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page g
8. ENERGY AND MINE~L RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy consewation
plans? ( (~)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( (~)
c) Result in the loss of availability of 8 known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( (~)
9. HA~RDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides. chemicals. or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ) (~)
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ) (~)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) )
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ) (~)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( )
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (~) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a) The project would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the
development would add people and traffic to the area. The impact is not considered
significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 1
b) The project is impacted by road noise from Base Line Road, a major arterial, and
Etiwanda Avenue, a secondary street. A Noise Study was prepared by LSA
Associates to determine the level of impacts and the mitigation. Project related long-
term vehicular trip increases are anticipated to be moderate. The incremental traffic
noise level increases would be less than significant. No significant traffic noise
impacts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site
residential uses would be potentially exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the
60 dBA Ldn standard in outdoor activity areas. Following are mitigation
measures for the project:
1) The developer will be required to incorporate setbacks and/or sound
barriers that protect outdoor activities.
2) Mechanical ventilation will be required to ensure thatwindows can remain
closed and still achieve the interior noise standard.
Signfficant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si nt S~ nt
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Schools? ( ) () (~.) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, ncluding roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
Comments:
c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the
project. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed
development. With mitigation, the impact to the School Districts is not
considered significant. A standard condition of approval will require the
developer to pay the school impact fees.
I
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Communication systems?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 11
Significant
Irnpacl Less
Potentially Unless Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
f) So d waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( (V)
g) Local or reg onal water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( (v')
Comments:
e) The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased
runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site.
With required mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. The
developer will be required to construct a drainage solution to channel the
surface runoff from the project to the existing basin south of Victoria Park
Lane.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
( ) ( ) (v') )
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (v') )
Comments:
b) One of the site's street frontage is Etiwanda Avenue. Etiwanda Avenue Overlay
District has established special design and development criteria that protect and
enhance the visual and historic character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue. The
subdivision design should encourage residential structures that front onto the street
and architectural style for homes for the tier of lots along this street should reflect the
existing historic homes found along Etiwanda Avenue. With the special design and
development criteria of the Etiwanda Avenue Oveday District applied to the project,
the impact would be insignificant.
c) New light and glare will be created since the site is currently vacant. The impact is
no greater than other existing residential developments in the City.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Page 12
f Potentially
Irnpacl Less
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( )
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (~')
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
( ) ( ) (~')
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) (~')
Potenlially Unless Thsn
Issues end Supl~arling Informslion Sou~'ces: S'
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ( ) (V') ( )
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ( ] ( ) (V')
Comments:
a) With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. The developer of the
project will be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (e/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15947 Pa,ge 13
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( )
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Ddve (check all
that apply):
(~") General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(V')Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(~') Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR
(SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983)
Initial Study for City of Ranaho Cucamonga I
Tentative Tract '15947 Page ~ 4
APPLIOANT OERTIFIOATION
I ee~i~ ~ha[ I 8m lhe 8ppli~n~ for ~he projeel described in ~his Initial SJud~. I acknowledge [ha[I
have ~ead [his Initial S~ud~ and ~he proposed mitigation measures. Fu~her, I have ~evised the
pro]eo~ plans or proposals and/or hereby agree ~o ~he proposed mitigation measures ~o 8void the
effects or mitigate the efteels [o 8 poin~ where olearl~ no significant environment81 effects would
OCCUr.
Signate:
Print Name and Title:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for pubtic review in accordance with the
Ca~fornia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15947 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999
Project Name: Regent Homes Project Applicant: Regent Homes
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite C-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue
and Base Line Road -APN: 227-171-004.
Project Description: A residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 10 acres of land in Low
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 13, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
Base Map Source: Eagle Aerial Photography, April 23, 1996.
12/8/98(REH830/Bio) Figure 3
N
LSA Regent Homes
~"' ~ xL ~)~ Vegetation Map
0 500' I000'
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Nancy Fong/Warren Morelion March 16, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15947 - REGENT HOMES. INC, - A
residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 9.05 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential
District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the south west comer
of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue-APN: 227-171-004
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-03 - REGENT HOMES,
INC. - A residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 9.05 acres of land in the Low Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the south
west comer of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227-171o004
Desiqn Parameters: The site is vacant and slopes southeasterly at approximately 5 percent. Three
large California Fan Palm trees and one Silver Maple tree are at the corner of Base Line Road and
Etiwanda Avenue there. A Eucalyptus windrow is along the south property boundary. An arborist's
report has been prepared indicating that a Palm tree, the Maple tree and many Eucalyptus trees are
deceased and/or decayed. The arborist recommends the removal of deceased or decaying trees with
replacement, and preservation of the two healthy Palm trees by either maintaining them in place or
relocating them to a more suitable site. The frontage along Etiwanda Avenue is under the special
development criteda of EtiwaOda Avenue Oreday District, and as shown in the attachment.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding
this project:
1. Should lots along Etiwanda Avenue be designed to front Etiwanda Avenue? Etiwanda Avenue
Overlay District was established to reinforce the identity and special character of the Etiwanda
community. In reviewing past projects above Base Line Road, the Commission has
encouraged new development with front-on lots. However, the applicant has indicated having
front-on lots at the busy intersection of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue would diminish
the quality of life for those lots near the intersection. The applicant proposed to have side-on
lots along Etiwanda Avenue. Staff believes that side-on lots would be acceptable provided that
the orientation of houses for these lots would front Etiwanda Avenue with garages and
driveways located in the rear for access to interior streets. This is because there is a restricted
access policy for Etiwanda Avenue.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. To further enhance community character and flavor the perimeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue
should not have a solid design. It should be designed using a combination of river rock and
wrought iron.
2. Landscaping should be provided for lots with street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue to furlher
enhance the character of the community.
3, The developer should provide a windrow along the project's northern sloped area to reinfo;ce
the character of the community.
EXHIBIT "J- 1" C ?
DRC COMMENTS
T1' 15947 - REGENT HOMES, INC.
March 16, 1999
Page 2
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. River rock curbing is required along Etiwanda Avenue per Etiwanda Specific Plan
requirements. i..
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee to approve the project
subject to the above recommended modifications.
Attachments
Desi~n Review Committee Action:
Members present: Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart, Larry Henderson
Staff Planners: Nancy FongANarren Morelion
The Committee recommended that the following issues be addressed and subjected to further
Committee review as a Consent item:
1. Front-on lots and/or houses are required along Etiwanda Avenue. Provide house plotting
showing fronFon design. Homes along Etiwanda Avenue should also be designed to
architecturally blend in with interior lots in cul-de-sac. Lots along Eliwanda Avenue must
comply with Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District requirements.
2. Provide landscaping for lots with street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue to further enhance the
character oi' the community.
3. Provide a windrow along the projects northern sloped area to reinforce the character of the
community.
4. Provide river rock curbing along Etiwanda Avenue per Etiwanda Specific Plan.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m. Nancy Fong July 6, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15947 - REGENT HOMES, INC. - A
residential subdivision of 31 single family lots on 9.05 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential
District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer
of Base Line Road and EEtiwanda Avenue - APN: 227-171.004.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-03 - REGENT HOMF,~
INC. - A residential subdivision of 31 single family lot on 9.05 acres of land in the Low-Medium
Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the
southwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227-171-004.
Backqround: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Henderson) reviewed the above project on Mamh 16,
1999 and recommended that front-on lots and/or houses should be used along Etiwanda Avenue. The
Committee also recommended that a concept of how this could be achieved be submitted for their
review. Attached for your reference is the March 16, 1999 Design Review Action Comments. The
applicant has provided concept plans that show houses designed with porches fronting on to Etiwanda
Avenue. The conc~,pt plans include one with a bus bay and right turn lane and one without the
additional right*of-way. The applicant has provided a front yard landscape scheme and a perspective
street scape along Etiwanda Avenue.
Staff Comments: The folldwing comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
1. As a result of reviewing their plans, staff believes that the applicant has addressed the
recommendation of the Committee regarding houses fronting on to Etiwanda Avene. The
remaining recommendations can be placed as condition of approval.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project.
Attachment: Design Review Action Comments dated March 16, 1999
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong
The Committee recommended approval of the concept plans along Etiwanda Avenue.
EXHIBIT "J-2" v, /
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT 15947
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project.
This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation
measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action
and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City
in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the
following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TT 15947
October 13, 1999
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15947 Applicant: Reqent Homes, Inc.
Initial Study Prepared by:~ Date:
~,ir Quality
Construction equipment onsite shall be based on low CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2, 3, 4
emissions factors and high-energy efficiency. will submit
Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment in- CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
lieu of gasoline-powered engines shall be done will submit
where feasible. proof at
plan check
Construction grading plans shall include a statement CP/BO B As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
that work crews will shut off equipment when not in will submit
~ use. proof at
~ plan check
f~ Ride-share and transit incentives shall be CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
encouraged for construction crews.
~ will submit
proof at
".J:: plan check
Dust generated by the development activities shall be CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
retained on-site and kept to a minimum. will submit
proof at
plan check
Pre-coated natural color building materials, water- CP/BO C As necessary Applicant 2,3,4
based or low VOC coating, and coating transfer or will submit
spray equipment with high transfer efficiency shall be proof at
used. plan check
TransportatlonlCIrculatlon
Fully improve Base Line Road in accordance to City CE D As necessary C/A 3,4
Standards.
MITI( MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE 5947 Page 2
Transpodation development fees shall be paid upon CE B As necessary C/A 3,4
issuance of building permits
Traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line CE D As necessary C/A 3,4
Road shall be modified as necessary to
accommodate an increase in traffic due to
construction.
BIological Resources
Preserve two palm trees by relocation CP C As necessary C/A 2,3,4
Replace two existing Eucalyptus windrow with one CP D As necessary C/A 2,3,4
along the nodh property boundary.
Follow preservation requirement listed on page 7 of CP B As necessary C/A 2,3,4
the December 14, 1999 Arborist Repod.
Noise
Incorporate setbacks and/or sound barriers that CP/BO C As necessary C/A 3
protect outdoor activities.
Install mechanical ventilation to ensure that windows CP/BO C As necessary C/A 3
can remain closed and still achieve the interior noise
standard.
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions
CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or deslgnee 6 - Revoke CUP
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 15947, A SUBDIVISION OF 31 LOTS ON 9.11 ACRES OF LAND IN
THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE
LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-171-004.
A, Recitals.
1. Regent Homes has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map 15947,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter. in this Resolution, the subject Tentative
Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said
headng on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is heraby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudrig the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the southwest comer of Base Line
Road and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 1,290 feet and lot depth of
approximately 660 feet; and
b. The property to the north is developed with single family homes, the property to
the west has a 40 lot subdivision proposed, and the property to the east and south are vacant;
and
c. The subdivision design, the lot sizes, and dimensions are consistent with the
Low-Medium District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
d. The development of the site will require the removal of a windrow of seven
eucalyptus trees, a maple and a palm tree, and the relocation of two palm trees. A condition of
approval has been placed requiring a new windrow to be planted in the rear of the lots that backup
to Base Line Road and the relocation of the two palm trees to be planted as a special treatment
at the comer of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue; and
e. Mitigation measures for noise and traffic impacts are placed as a condition of
approval for this project.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and
Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause sedous public health problems; and
f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions. attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division
1) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit 99-03 shall apply.
2) A minimum 15-foot sidewalk and landscape easement shall be provided between
Lots 11 and 12 to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. The
final design for pedestrian walkway and landscaping shall be subject to City
Planner and City Engineer review and approval pdor to issuance of any permits
or recordation of map, whichever comes first.
3) A Conditional Use Permit and a Development Review application shall be
required for any house products.
4) Streetscape along Etiwanda Avenue shall comply with the Etiwanda Avenue
Overlay District.
5) A windrow consisting of 15-gallon size Eucalyptus Maculata, planted at 10 feet
on center, shall be provided to the north side of the site for the tier of lots that
back up to Base Line Road.
6) Tree Removal Permit 99-05 is approved for the removal of the existing windrow
along the south property boundary, the decaying palm tree, and a maple tree at
the northeast side of the site. The applicant/developer shall obtain authorization
from the southerly adjacent property owner for the trees that are at the south
property line. The approval is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of
building and/or grading permits.
7) The applicant/developer shall in good faith work with the southedy adjacent
property owner to obtain authorization for the removal of trees at the shared
property line and the overall property boundary grading for interfacing. If the
applicant/developer can not obtain authorization from the southedy adjacent
property owner, the south property boundary perimeter wall shall include
terracing walls, offsetting of walls around existing trees, and/or a combination of
th.em or other acceptable techniques, subject to City Planner review and approval
pnor to issuance of any permit. The design and material of the wall shall be
subject to City Planner review and approval.
8) The two healthy palm trees shall be preserved by relocating to the comer of Base
Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, subject to City Planner review and approval.
The palms shall be protected by an appropriate construction barrier such as a
chain link fence or other means acceptable to the City Planner, pdor to issuance
of any grading or building permits and prior to commencement of work.
Protective barriers shall remain in place during all phases of construction and
may not be removed without wdtten consent of the City Planner and until
construction is complete.
9) Perimeter wall along Base Line Road shall be decorative with a cap subject to
City Planner review and approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 4
Enfiineerin,q Division
1 ) The developer shall provide a Drainage Acceptance Agreement executed by the
owner of the property to the west or prepare an alignment study, acquire
right-of-way and construct the master planned storm drain from the Day Creek
Channel to Tentative Tract 15947. In the event the developer provides for
neither of the options listed and installation of the master planned storm drain is
completed by others pdor to this site developing, then this development shall
participate in a fair share cost distribution of the storm drain facilities.
2) In the event the developer provides an executed Drainage Acceptance
Agreement, an intedm drainage solution shall be designed to channel the surface
runoff from the project to the existing basin south of Victoria Park Lane to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3) Base Line Road shall be improved from Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements shall include but not
be limited to pavement, curb, and gutter. The developer shall make a good faith
effort to acquire the required off-site property interest necessary to construct the
required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so. the developer
shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required
for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the
developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the developer at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall be
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. The developer
may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off-
site improvements from the future development of the off-site properties fronting
Base Line Road. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement
agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the
City, all dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
4) An emergency access shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and Fire Marshall in the location proposed. In the event the developer cannot
acquire the off-site emergency access as proposed, an alternate access through
Lot 19 may be provided.
5) A fee for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the Base Line Road median
island landscaping, installed by Tract 15732. shall be paid pdor to the issuance
of building permits. The amount indicated on the approved reimbursement
agreement is $23,798.00 plus any interest due at the time of payment per City
Council Resolution 97-103.
6) The lettered lot on the south side of Base Line Road shall mirror the treatment
on the north side of Base Line Road, a minimum of 10 feet wide and a maximum
of 12 feet wide.
7) A southbound bus bay/right tum lane shall be installed on Etiwanda Avenue in
conformance with City Standard Drawing 119 for "C" Street.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 5
8) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened and stdped south of the project frontage to
provide a northbound left turn lane into the "C" Street to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
9) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing
overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66kV
electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City pdor
to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted
unit amount times the length from the center of Base Line Road to the south
project boundary.
10) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead
utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) on the
opposite side of Base Line Road shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of
building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted unit amount times
the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the west project boundary.
11) TheapplicantshallreimbursetheCityforthecostfortheirproportionatefrontage
of the Base Line Road widening and median construction and right-of-ways
purchase for both Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue in accordance with
Resolution 90-051.
12) ThetrafficsignalattheintersectionofEtiwandaAvenueandBaseLineroadshall
be modified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
13) A sidewalk easement shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
between Lots 11 and 12.
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
Air Quality
1 ) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site
based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction
Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that
all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electdc or diesel-powered equipment in
lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include
a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Dudng
smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period
should be extended, thereby, decreasing the size of the area prepared each day,
to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing and transit
incentives for construction crew.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 6
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site and kept
to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut
and fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent
dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities
cease.
b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep
all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving
the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the
later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind
exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the entire
area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until
the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not
OCCUr.
d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut and fill materials, and/or construction
debds to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of odgin.
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated natural
color building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating. and coating transfer
or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low
pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as a paint
brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Biological Resources
1) Preservation of two palm trees by relocating them to the comer of Base Line
Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
2) A replacement windrow consisting of 15-gallon size Eucalyptus Maculata planted
at 10 feet on center along the north property boundary, subject to City Planner
review and approval.
3) Follow the preservation requirement listed on page 7 of the Arborist Report dated
December 14, 1998.
Transportation
1) The developer shall fully ~mprove Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue in
accordance with City standards.
2) The developer shall pay transportation development fees upon issuance of
building permits, at a rate adopted by the City.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15947 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 7
3) The traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road shall be modified as
necessary to accommodate the increase in traffic due to the construction of the
proposed project.
Noise
1) Increase dwelling setbacks or provide a six-foot high sound wall to protect Lots
12 through 19 shall be required.
2) Mechanical ventilation, such as air-conditions, will be required for Lots 1, 11, 12,
and 25 through 30.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 15947 and Conditional Use Permit 99-03
SUBJECT: 31 Sin.qle Family Lot Subdivision
APPLICANT: Re.qent Homes, Inc.
LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Baseline Road and Etiwanda Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless e,'<tended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or appreved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
Co Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein. Development Code
regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
Proiect No TI' 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, aH Conditions /
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
a~l other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
8. All building numbers and individual units shatl be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
9. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
Pot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of
appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs.
10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January I of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proofofthis landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pdor
to the issuance of building permits.
12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all
lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice
requirements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunity concerns, hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
2
Project No, TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completjon Date
14. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two ~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds.
Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at
least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
15. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant.
16. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to
maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
17. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk.
18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
19. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street.
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. in addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
5.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas. the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
Project No. 'IT 15947 & CUP gg-03
Completion Date
Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided. and if
appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 719.00 , prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy). the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identity the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropdata type and location
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
H. General Requirements
1. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
2. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: City Beauti~cation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide
a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
Project No Tr 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and / /
prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
J. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __/__/
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / /
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / /
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline):
60 ~total feet on Base Line Road
50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets.
4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for
approved openings: Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
6.All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the
final map.
7. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
Project No. TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
Etiwanda Avenue ( )
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) curb shall be cobble rock in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific
Plan per City Standard 105-B. (f) Class II Bike Lane. (g) Post R26(s).
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6atintersectionsandNo. 5alongstreets, amaximumof200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
Project No Tr 15947 & CUP 9g-03
Completion Date
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
4.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commemial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
M. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Pubtic Works Standards shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Base Line Road parkway and Etiwanda Avenue parkway.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble
or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighfin9
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
N. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pdor to final map
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
O. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __ __ /
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocetion of existing utilities as necessary. / /
Project No. Tr 15947 & CUP 99°03
Completion Date
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
P. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage / /
Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior tO building permit issuance if no map is " '
involved. These fees shall be paid for the portion of the tract that falls within the Etiwanda/San
Sevaine Drainage area.
2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all
/ /
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Q. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 1200 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) / /
(Increase). --
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department / /
personnel prior to water plan approval. --
b. For the purpose of final acceptance an additional fire flow test ofthe on-site hydrants shall
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, / /
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided pdor to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6oinch dser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / /
inspection.
5. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / /
a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. / /
6. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. / /
I 7. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear / /
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements. '
Project NO TF 15947 & CUP 99~03
Completion Date
8.Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as follows:
a. $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
R. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
S. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted
from frame or track in any manner.
T. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 99-03 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 31 LOTS IN THE LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-171-004.
A. Recitals.
1. Regent Homes has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit
99-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, in this Resolution, the subject
Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of October, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Base Line
Road and Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of approximately 1,290 feet and lot depth of
approximately 660 feet; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site has been developed with single
family homes, the property to the west has a 40 lot subdivision proposed, and the property to the
east and south are vacant; and
c. The subdivision design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible with the
Low-Medium District and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
d. The lots along Etiwanda Avenue will accommodate the design for front-on
homes; and
e. The streetscape including front yard landscaping, walls and fencing are
consistent with the intent of the Etiwanda Avenue Oveday District.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-03 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfara or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fo~h
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herain by this reference.
Planninq Division
1) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 15947 shall apply.
2) A minimum 15-foot sidewalk and landscape easement shall be provided
between Lots 11 and 12 to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City
Engineer. The final design for pedestrian walkway and landscaping shall
be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval pdor to
issuance of any permits or recordation of map, whichever comes first.
3) A Conditional Use Permit and a Development Review application shall be
required for any house products.
4) Streetscape along Etiwanda Avenue shall comply with the Etiwanda
Avenue Overlay District.
5) House products shall have architectural styles that enhance and reinforce
the visual and histodc character and quality of Etiwanda Avenue.
6) Rock cobble curbing consistent with existing shall be required along
Etiwanda Avenue.
7) Fences, walls, etc. shall be of decorative matedal that reinforce the histodc
character of Etiwanda Avenue.
8) Special Community Entry design shall be provided at the corner of Base
Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 99-03 - Regent Homes
October 13, 1999
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 15947 and Conditional Use Permit 99-03
SUBJECT: 31 Single Family Lot Subdivision
APPLICANT: Regent Homes, Inc.
LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Baseline Road and Etiwanda Avenue
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shaft reimburse the City. its agents. officers. or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City. its agents. officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
Project No. TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the proiect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings sha)l be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner.
including proper illumination.
9. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of
appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs.
10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shal) submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January I of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior
to the issuance of building permits.
12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all
lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice
requirements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunity concerns, hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
2 ~ ~ ~ ,.~
Project NO TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
14. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two ~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds.
Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at
least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
15 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant.
16. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to
maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
17. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk.
18. For residential development, return wails and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
19. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street.
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropdate ground cover for erosion
control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irdgafion system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
5.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
Project NO. I'F 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
F. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shah be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /
implement ng said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 719.00 , prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forteit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropdate type and location /
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2110, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
H. General Requirements
1. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /
2. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage __ __/__
to the City prior to permit issuance.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be /
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code. National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to /
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide
a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
Project No TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
3.Street addresses sha~l be provided by the Building Official, after tractSparcel map recordation and
prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
J. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading ptan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and appreved prior to issuance of building permits.
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all intedor public streets,
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline):
60 total feet on Base Line Road
50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the pdvate streets.
4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets. except for
approved openings: Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
6.All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the
final map.
7. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
Project No. TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
L. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped /
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: /
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail island Trail
Base Line Road x x x x x (f) (g)
Etiwanda Avenue (e) x x x x . (f) (g)
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) curb shall be cobble rock in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific
Plan per City Standard 105-B. (f) Class II Bike Lane. (g) Post R26(s).
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights. and intersection safety lights/
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil ''
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d Signal condu it with pu II boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction /
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect widng Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
( 1 ) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
sc -~2~ 6
Project No 'Fr 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
4.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
5. intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
M. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Base Line Road parkway and Etiwanda Avenue parkway.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of monared cobble
or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdor to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue.
N. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pdor to final map
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
O. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
sc ~r25~99 7
Project NO TT 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water D strict (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
P. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage /.__/
Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is
involved. These fees shall be paid for the portion of the tract that fails within the Etiwanda/San
Sevaine Drainage area.
2. A non-refundable depos t sha be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Q. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 1200 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) / /
(Increase).
a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __ __ /
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test ofthe on-site hydrants shall /
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, /
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided pdor to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __ __ /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final /
~nspection.
5. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: /
a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. /
6. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. /
7. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear /
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements.
Project No TF 15947 & CUP 99-03
Completion Date
8.Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as follows:
a. $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
R. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. Ifwindows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
3. All garage or rolling doom shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
S. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted
from frame or track in any manner.
T. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
CITY OF RANCH() CUCAMONGA ' ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9940 -
DAYBREAK PROPERTIES (AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER)-The development
of two office buildings totaling 50,900 square feet (25,000 and 25,900 square feet,
respectively) and a 20,800 square-foot health club building on 6.2 acres of land in
the Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located
at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street -APN: 210-062-13.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Industrial Area Specific Plan, (Subarea 16), improved with single-family
residences
South - City of Ontado
East Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 4)
West Low-Medium Residential (4-8 Dwelling Units per acre)
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Industrial Park
North Industrial Park
South - City of Ontario
East Industrial Park
West Low-Medium Residential (4-8 Dwelling Units per acre)
C. Parkinq Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Required
Building I (office) 25,900 1/250 104 104
Building 2 (health club) 20,800 1/200 139 110
Building 3 (office) 25,000 1/250 100 139
Total 50,900 343 353*
* All parking spaces are available for all of the uses on-site via a reciprocal parkin9
and access agreement.
ITEH E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 9940 - AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER
October 13, 1999
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed offices and health club are permitted uses in the Industrial Area
Specific Plan (Subarea 16). The site is presently vacant and is relatively fiat. The site
contains several mature trees along Fourth Street and behind the City's entry gateway.
The City's entry gateway fronts the project site at the corner of Archibald Avenue and
Fourth Street.
B. Desiqn Parameters: The Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential subdivision (approved
by the Planning Commission in 1996) is located immediately to the west of this project.
The proposed project will be designed as three concrete tilt-up buildings, with painted
metal trellises, green reflective glass for windows, and cornice treatments. The building
exterior will be designed with two building materials, medium sandblasted and smooth
concrete finishes. The main entrance to each building will be accentuated with a
curvilinear parapet feature. This design feature has been unified (for all three buildings)
by using a medium sandblasted building material.
Access to the project site will be provided along Archibald Avenue via three driveway
approaches. The northem driveway approach will be used for emergencies only. The
remaining two driveways will provide ingress and egress for the three buildings.
Extensive landscaping will be provided within the parking lot area and around each of
the buildings. Landscape berms will be provided both along Archibald Avenue and
Fourth Street to screen views of the parking areas from the public right-of-way.
C. Design Review Committee: On September 14, 1999, the Design Review Committee
(McNiel, Stewart, Fong) considered and recommended approval, subject to minor
revisions, of the Development/Design Review application andthe proposed modification
to the Master Plan. (See Exhibit "H").
D. Technical/Gradin,q Review Committees: The Technical/Grading Committees have
reviewed the project and recommend approval with conditions.
E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff
has completed Part II. Staff has found that there are no impacts associated with the
project. Therefore, if the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 9940 - AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER
October 13, 1999
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
DevelopmentJDesign Review 9940 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SS\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Artist's Rendering
Exhibit "G" - Initial Study
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated September 14,
1999
Exhibit "1" - Grading Plan
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
~ !§ ~ ......... ~ EXISTIN~'"S.F.D. Ii
I """:'~ ~ - AY
..., . .
,._././. o.;:.o po~ I'
/ ~ ~ ~
' I ~ .......
~ ' PO~S ALONG SI~ -
a e ~ONTAGE (O~ER J i AUTQ PARKING
' ~AN GUY PO~) J " LI
I ' ~' PROPOSED ~
~ ~fiLLENNIUM PLAZA' " 1
.,~ ' SITE I':
I c . a ....
PP~1OO201E c. , PP 4168382E : I ~
ACHO CUCAMONGA
~ FOURTH ST CITY OF ON~'A~IO
' GUy PO~~ ~'~
V~c:'Ib~/'p'T'
_ Archelon
AIRPORT
CORPO~TE
CENTER
................................................~ ~ ~
E 9 FU~
................................................ / SUBMI~AL
................................................ Illlill{
~ ~ -'~""~
{{{l{{l{
Archeion
^IRIF'ORT
CORPOR^TR
ClaNTIeR
Illlllll
fillNil
f--- , ,/~. ,! =='"' "' -"Z"-"® ~-"-' Arc~tion
......... .,.. :,
· , .,~ .~. ,-~ , ,,~t ==~ - ,_~ ~:::l :-':.~.~
· V'EST AIRPORT
& CORPORATE
CENTER
FULL
SUBMITfAL
{{}{1111
NORTH
{{l{{}{{
............ {{[{{{ll
souT. ~
/ /g.~' /~ //~" ~ nr, h i
I I Ai~O~
' CORPO~T~
BAST ~ ~ 'mr---- ~ / CENTER
/,FU~
...... ~, ,~ ,. gill
NOR~ ~ ~ ~,.
.~ . .
~ST
--I~.--~~~~~P~ ' ~---/~'
SOU'l H
NORTH ^IRPORT
C0RPORATr.
FULL
IIIIIlll
E~VATIONS
EAST
I{111111
. . ... . . ._...~.... .... ; .......
~ST
CAR PORT ELEV. LUNCH PATIO TREllIS ELEV.
AIRPORT
CORPORATE
RESIDENTIAL CRNTER
mm FULL
CAR PORT EI.EV. ~m'~'~s'anm'° SUBMITTAL
"""""' RI{{}II
~,. · r- ~,,L'~ -c-'-- SECTIONS
'~ ' ~ "! ' IllHill
PARTIAL ELEV. OF WALl, =~i'T' ~
ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE
~=~./~i ~ ,i'~=."==='~ ,.~ L,'Li i,~ ~ ~:.=.. ....=.. ~-~---':"T'==
S~.ctlbN A-A ~--'
IIUIII)ING lli BUIII}ING 11~ BUILDING
s~.c'tio~ n-. i :
BUILDING t I ] '~'J'~
AIRPORT
SECTION 'C" [~/~ ] CORPORATE
CENTER
FULl,
SUHMITTAL
~//////.~
· ~ ~////////////////,~ II[lll{{
~ ~ HUILDING
BUILDING d{ 1
P^RTI^~.SECnON "C" 1{1} }Ill
~///////////////////x go.
s~oN 'u' {
Iii}l{lI
_'ll ,, _
{
HUI~ING ~
SE~ION 'E" ]
o0 RESIDENTIAL
Rnh,lea
AIRPORT
..~ CORPORATE
CENTER
FULL
SUBMI~AL
$1111Hl
- .~~~~ ........
7
.... II ; IHIHll
I I COMMERCIAL ~NDSCAP
P~T P~.: E ~DSC~E NOTES
__.,..,__,. ___~... .___.~_,__. ~NDSCAPE SECTION
A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA IllIll II
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development Review 99-40
2. Related Files:
3. Description of Project: The project includes construction of two office buildings, 25,900
square feet and 25,000 square feet in size, respectively, and one health club building,
20,800 square feet in size. The project will be designed as three concrete tilt-up buildings,
with painted metal trellis, green reflective glass for windows, and cornice treatments. The
building exteriors will be designed with two materials, including rough and medium
sandblasted finishes. The main entrances for each building will be accentuated with
smooth-troweled colored concrete and wash-off concrete aggregate and landscaping. The
site is approximately 8 acres in size and is located at the northwest corner of Archibald
Avenue and Fourth Street - APN: 210-062-13.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Daybreak Properties
9007 Center Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park
6. Zoning: Industrial Park Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 16)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The parcels are surrounded by single-family
residences to the north; the appreved Cucamonga Cornerpointe Residential development
to the west, and the City of Ontario to the south.
8, Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Salvador M. Salazar, AICP
Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
N/A
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 9940 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated, as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
( ) Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in a previous EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that previous EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
the proposed project will have no additional significant effect on the environment that was
not identified in the Master EIR previously certified for the project site and that no new or
additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required. The proposed project was
described in and is within the scope of the project covered by the Master EIR. No new EIR
or Negative Declaration is required for the proposed project pursuant to Section 21157 of
the Public de (CEQA).
Signed: ~
r M. Salazar, AICP
September 16, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 9940 Pa~le 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposak
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-d) The uses for the project are permitted in the current General Plan Zoning
designation of the property; therefore, implementation of the project will not result
in any significant impacts or conflicts with the surrounding land use.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposak
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-c) The proposed project is for office and health club buildings and will not increase
population or induce development, Instead, the project will better respond to
demands for office and health club facilities in the region, Displacement will not
OCCUF.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 9940 Pa~le 4
Significant
Issues anti SuppoMing Inlormation Sources: Impacl Less
Potentially Unless Than
ignificanl Miligation ignificant r~No~
IrnDact Impact I ct
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation. grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-i) The affected site is not characterized by seismic hazards any more than any other
area in seismically active Southern California. Compliance with standard Uniform
Building Code and City regulations and requirements ensures that significant
geologic and seismic hazards will not result.
S~gnifcsnt
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns.
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) (x)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) (x)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g. , temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) (x)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) (x)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa~le 5
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
ex~vations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
h) Impacts to groundwater quailS? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater othe~ise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-i) The project will not result in any signifi~nt changes in absorption rates, drainage
pa~erns or rates or amount of surface runoff. The project site is relatively fiat and
will not affect overall drainage paRems. The appli~nt is required to submit plans
to the Engineering Division to ensure the project site is afforded adequate drainage
se~ices.
5. ~ QUALI~. Would the proposah
a) Violate any air quali~ standard or ~ntribute to
an existing or projected air quali~ violstion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Expose sensitive re~ptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
~use any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-d) The project is not of a s~le or land use that would signifi~ntly violate any air quali~
standard, alter regional climate, or create objectionable odors.
6. T~NSPORTATION/GIRGU~TION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or tra~c congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa~le 6
Significant
b) Hazards to safeW from design features (e.g.,
sharp cu~es or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Insufficient parking ~paci~ on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
0 Conflicts with adopted policies supposing
alternative transpo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-g) The project is not of a s~le or land use that would create congestive ~nditions on
nearby roadways. The appli~nt is required to comply with Ci~ Engineering
regulations and standards to ensure hazards associated with access and ent~ and
turning movements will not occur. Parking will be provided in a~rdance with Ci~
requirements. The project is not of a s~le that would ~nfiict with altemative
transpo~ation requirements. Rail and air traffic will not be affected.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Lo~lly designated species (e.g., hedtage trees.
eu~lyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) (x)
c) Lo~lly designated natural ~mmunities (e.g.,
eu~lyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) (x)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., mamh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) (x)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-e) The Industrial Specific Plan area, including the project site, is Io~ted near the Ci~'s
gateway ent~. The entire viciniW is therefore intended for future industrial
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa~le 7
development, similar to the project, and is not characterized by any sensitive or
significant biological resources.
Signi~canl
Issues and Suppoffing Information Sources: ign~ficant Mitigation ilgr~fi~ctnl irn~N~
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( (x)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( (x)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( (x)
ISSUe~ and Supi)offing InfOnTatron Sources: grtilicant Mittga~on ilgn~i~(~nt
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-c) The project is not of a scale that would significantly increase noise levels and
exposures.
initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa~e 8
Significant
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-e) The various public agencies are prepared to provide the necessary services to the
project site. Schools will not be significantly impacted by the project, since it is of
an industrial type.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on utilities and
service systems. The various utility and service agencies are prepared to provide
necessary services to the project site and the proposed project. The applicant is
required to comply with City Engineering requirements and standards to ensure that
future development is afforded adequate utilities and services.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Page 9
Potentially L
Significant
13. AESTHETICS, Would the proposah
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) (x)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic ( ) (x)
effect?
c) Create light or glare? ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-c) The project has undergone Design Review with the Ci~, which addresses the
foregoing issues. The project, as designed, will not create any signifi~nt impact
associated with aesthetic and visual issues.
I~es and ~p~ing Inf~tion ~ur~: I~nl I~ gni~nt NO
14.CULTU~L RESOURCES. Would the proposah
a) Disturb paleontologi~l resources? ( (x)
b) Disturb archaeologi~l resources? ( (x)
c) Affect histori~l or cultural resources? ( (x)
d) Have the potential to ~use a physi~t change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural ( (x)
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ( (x)
Comments:
a-e) The Industrial Specific Plan Area, including the project site, is Io~ted near a Ci~
gateway ent~. The entire viciniW is therefore intended for future development and
is not characterized by any sensitive or cultural resources.
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Affect existing recreational oppo~unities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa~le 10
Comments:
a-b) The project is not of a land use that will increase the demand on parks in the area.
The project applicant will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of
building permit issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not
considered significant.
Significant
Impact Less
Issues and SupCorling Information Sources: P0tential~y Unless Than
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
pedods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-40 Pa,c)e 11
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all
that apply):
(x) General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(x)Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(x) Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR
(SCH #95112019, certified July 1996)
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:20 p.m. Sal Salazar/Duane Morita September 14, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-40 - DAYBREAK
PROPERTIES (AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER) - The development of two office buildings
totaling 50,900 square feet and a 20,800 square foot health club building on 8 acres of land in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northwest
comer of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street - APN: 210-062-13.
Desiqn Parameters: The site is vacant and is relatively fiat. It contains a row of street trees along
Fourth Street frontage and several mature trees behind the City's Entry Gateway at the immediate
corner of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street. The Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential
subdivision. which was approved by the City in 1996, is located immediately to the west of this
project.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Buildinq Desiqn: The building design consists of painted tilt-up concrete buildings with light
sandblasted surface for accent material, painted metal trellises at main building entries,
green reflective glass for windows, and cornice treatments for the roof. Overall. there are
no major design issues with the elevations, however, the following recommendations would
further enhance the building design:
a. The curvilinear parapet feature above the entrance of each building is an attached flat
facade. This design feature needs to be better integrated to the overall building
design. The entries with the curvilinear parapet could be unified by a single material
such as medium sandblasted surfaces. Will the back side of the curvilinear parapet
be treated architecturally?
b. Change the light sandblasted surface to a medium sandblasted surface.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed. and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Because of a bus turn lane at Fourth Street and the setback for Building 1 (two-story) needs
to be adjusted to meet the 45-foot setback.
2. Provide a dense row of trees, planted at 10 feet on center, along the west property
boundary to provide further buffering from the residential development.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project with the above changes.
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-40 - DAYBREAK PROPERTIES
September 14, 1999
Page 2
Desiqn Review Committee Action: '
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Sal Salazar/Duane Morita
The Committee recommended approval with the following requirements:
1. The curvilinear parapet feature above the entrance of each building should have greater
depth and better integrated into the building design. The final concept should be submitted
for Committee review under consent calendar agenda.
2. Change the light sandblasted surface to a medium sandblasted surface.
3. Outdoor eating area for Building No. 2 (Health Spa) be moved closer to Building No. 4. The
building materials for the carports must be of steel. The color for the carports and the
trellises must be painted earth tone or a light gray color.
CFrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
"~ AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER ~ . ._
1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The fo~owing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Qua~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development Review 99-40 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999
Project Name: Airport Corporate Center Project Applicant: Daybreak Properties
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northwest comer of Archibald Avenue and
Fourth Street - APN: 210-062-13.
Project Description: The development of two office buildings totaling 50,900 square feet and a 20,800
square foot health club building on 8 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted
an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 13, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW NO. 9940 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 50,900 SQUARE FEET (25,900
AND 25,000 SQUARE FEET, RESPECTIVELY) AND A 20,800 SQUARE -
FOOT HEALTH CLUB BUILDING ON APPROXIMATELY 6.2 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 16) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF FOURTH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-13.
A. Recitals.
1. Day Break Properties has filed an application for the construction of two office buildings
totaling 50,900 square feet (25,900 and 25,000 square feet, respectively) and a 20,800 square foot
health club building as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development/Design Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on
that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudrig the above-
referenced meeting on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street
and Archibald Avenue; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with various single family
homes, the property to the east is developed with industrial uses, the property to the west is a 339-
single family residential development, and the properties to the south are in the City of Ontario; and
c. The proposed offices and health club uses are permitted in the Industrial Area
Specific Plan (Subarea 16); and
d. The project will comply with all applicable provisions of the Development Code,
Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the General Plan; and
e. The project is designed to be compatible with surrounding development and
provide a high degree of aesthetic appeal; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-40 - AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER
October 13, 1999
Page 2
f. The proposed use is in accordance with the goals of the General Plan and the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headrig and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety. or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon
the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Planninq Division
1) The curvilinear parapet feature shall have a greater depth and
integrate better into building design and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Design Review Committee.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-40 - AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER
October 13, 1999
Page 3
2) Sandblasted finish shall be medium.
3) Outdoor eating area for Building No. 2 shall be moved closer to
Building No. 4.
4) The carports shall be steel building material.
5) The carport color and trellis color shall be painted earth tone or a light
gray color.
En~ineerin,q Division
1) The existing street improvements along the Fourth Street and
Archibald Avenue frontages shall be protected in place. Those
improvements include: traffic striping, traffic signage (including R26(s)
and signal ahead) and the westbound bus bay at the northwest comer
of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue.
2) The westedy adjacent development, Tract 15727, is required to
complete all Fourth Street frontage improvements and the northwest
corner of the Archibald Avenue/Fourth Street intersection, including
relocation of the first catch basin and traffic signal. Said
improvements shall be completed pdor to the issuance of building
permits for this development.
3) Limited access curb per City Standard Drawing 105-C shall be
constructed for the emergency access drive to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
4) The existing curb adjacent sidewalk on Archibald Avenue shall be
removed and replaced with curvilinear sidewalk per city Standard
Drawing 114. The sidewalk shall be constructed entirely within the
dedicated right-of-way. Additional sidewalk easements may need to
be dedicated behind driveways to allow for the sidewalks to cross
ddve approaches at the zero curb face. All easements shall be
dedicated prior to the issuance of building permits.
5) The hydrology study for the Archibald Storm Drain reflects the tabling
of the on-site runoff to be split. The south 500 feet is tabled to the
west on Fourth Street. The remainder of the site is tabled to drain to
Archibald Avenue and be intercepted by the Archibald Storm Drain.
Spot evaluations on the grading plan shall clearly indicate that the
flows reaching Fourth Street will drain to the west and the flows
reaching Archibald Avenue are intercepted by the Archibald Storm
Drain. Additionally, the City policy is to allow only 5 acres to drain
through a curb side drain outlet. The site is 6.5 acres. Redesign the
grading to split the flows between two under sidewalk drains
consistent with the existing hydrology for the Archibald Storm Drain.
6) Provide 9500L HPSV street lights as needed on Fourth Street (one)
and Archibald Avenue (four).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-40 - AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER
October 13, 1999
Page 4
7) There are approved beautification masterplans for both Archibald
Avenue and Fourth Street. These concepts reach beyond the public
right-of-way in scope. On-site landscape plans shall be reviewed by
the Engineering Division for conformance with the masterplan
concepts. Mortared rockscape shall be incorporated into both
frontages with an emphasis on Fourth Street.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'FI'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Design/Development Review 99-40
SUBJECT: Airport Corporate Center
APPLICANT: Day Break Properties
LOCATION: NWC Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmentJDesign Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
Co Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping. sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
2.Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
SC ~/25/99
Project No. OR 99-40
Completion Date
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc. ) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days pdor to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
D. Shopping Centers
1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City
Planner:
,/ Architecturally integrated into the design of the project.
,,/ Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doore and to
include self--closing pedestrian doors.
,t' Large enough to accommodate two trash bins.
,/ Roll-up doors.
· / Trash bins with counter-weighted lids.
Project No DR 99-40
Completion Date
v' Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis.
Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed
to be hidden from view.
2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and
debris remain for more than 24 hours.
4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only."
5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which
shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants:
Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an
exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the
hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m.
~ Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading. opening, closing,
or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other
similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein,
in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.
6. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza.
They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination
thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
7. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be __ /
included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
8. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza
area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures.
9. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle
variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
E. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shah be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main
building colors.
Project No DR 99-40
Completion Date
F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided
throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open
spaces/plazas/recreational uses.
4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space
in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public
right-of-way.
6. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of
stalls for use by the handicapped.
7. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more
parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the
rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet.
8. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily
residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five pement of the required
automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first
50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of
the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distdbution uses shall provide bicycle
storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a
minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required
exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off
to the higher whole number.
9. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for
commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
G. Trip Reduction
1. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided.
H. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
Project No. DR 99-40
Completion Date
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within
commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.
4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Fourth Street
and Archibald Avenue.
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
11. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
I. Signs
1.Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U,S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mail boxes, Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
Project No DR 99-40
Completion Date
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
K. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following:
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets. detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #. CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pdor to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City pdor to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
L. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
andregulationsineffectatthetimeofpermitapplication. PleasecontacttheBuildingandSafety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Pdor to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition
to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.
Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee,
School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees
receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
Project No, DR 99-40
Completion Date
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and
prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public
counter).
6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department
for approval.
M. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s).
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.
4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental
Health Services prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table
5-A.
6. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906.
7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed.
N. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
Registered Civil Engineer.
Project NO, DR 9940
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVIS ION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
O. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall
be dedicated to the City.
2. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of
7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
P. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interiorstreets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Curb & A.C. Side- Odve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr, Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
Fourth Street X X
Archibald Avenue e e c X X e
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked. sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) Installation of right turn lane requires new curb and gutter. a.c.
pavement, and catch basin relocation.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans. including streettrees, street lights. and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping. marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduitwith pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
Project NO DR 99-40
Completion Date
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
7. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue.
8. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
9. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water Distdct (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water distdct within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
Project No. DR 9940
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909)477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Q. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 3000 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) / /
(Increase). ~ --
,[ A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire / /
department personnel prior to water plan approval.
./ For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site / /
hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire
department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, / /
and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __ / /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / /
inspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. /
v' Other: 1994 UBC. /
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, ~ammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
6. Sprinkler system monitodng shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of /
sprinkler system.
7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
v' Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. /
8. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: /
v' All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. /
9. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. /
10. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear /
of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distdct requirements.
co,,,p~euo. D.te
11. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet,
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
12. A building directory shall be required. as noted below:
/ Standard Directory in main lobby.
13. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall
be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
14. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as follows:
,/' $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).**
**Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems. alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
15. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Security Lighting
1, All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power.
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.
S. Security Hardware
1.One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. Ifwindows are within
40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices.
T. Building Numbering
1.Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be
a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background.
The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department.
Project No, DR 99-40.
Completion Date
U. Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and __/__/__
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in
turn save dollars and lives.
CI'FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ,_, .f\~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner
Duane Morita, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan
Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park
(Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential
(4-6 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the
west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove
approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map
(Subarea 16), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of
ArchibaldAvenue-APN: 210-062-31.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the
Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land
from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between
Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue -
APN: 210-062-31.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the
General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from
Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between
Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue
APN: 210-062-28 and 34.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7
acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of
Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34.
ITEMS F-N
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-04 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling
0.7 acre in size Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located
between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue
APN: 210-062-28 and 34.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the
General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in
size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between
Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue
APN: 210-062-10.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request
to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel
approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on
the west side of Archibald Avenue - ApN: 210-062-10.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel
approximately1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units
per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of
Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-10.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: Proposed amendments to the General Plan, Industrial Area Specific
Plan, and Development Distdct regulations will allow development of 4-8 dwelling units
per acre of land. Presently, Industrial Park uses, consistent with provisions contained
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16) are allowed.
B. Surroundin.q Land Use and Zoninq:
North Currently vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan
South- Currently vacant; Industdal Park (Subarea16) in the lndustrial Area Specific
Plan; Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
East General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
West - Approved Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development; Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 3
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16)
North Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16)
South - Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16), Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre)
East Industrial Area SpeCific Plan (Subareas 4 and 5)
West Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
D. Site Characteristics: The properties associated with the proposed applications are
located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue, within
the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). The 18.5-acre Griffin Industries site is
presently vacant and directly abuts the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential
development, which is located to the wast and southwest. Several single-family
residences exist within the 0.7-acre properties located immediately to the northeast of
the 18.5-acre site. The 1.6-acre site also has several residential structures located
onsite. One of the structures on the property, the Lucas Ranch House, is a significant
cultural resource with a potential National and State Register designation as well as a
potential Local Landmark designation.
ANALYSIS:
A. Back,qround: In November 1996, the City approved the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development for a 76.6-acre site within the Industrial Area Specific Plan
(Subarea16). Concurrently, theCity initiated and re-designated two adjoining parcels
from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, to Low-Medium
Residential. Staff recommended that these two parcels be re-designated from
Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential, to be compatible with the residential
development.
B. General: The applicant, Griffin Industries, intends to expand their Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential development. To allow for this expansion, the applicant is
requesting a General Plan Amendment to re-designate their property from Industrial
Park (Industrial Area Specific Plan - Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential; a
Specific Plan Amendment to remove the property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
and a Development District Amendment to re-zone the property from Industrial Park
(Industrial Area Specific Plan - Subarea 16) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre). Those applications that are requested by Griffin Industries include
GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03.
In reviewing Griffin Industries' applications, staff is of the opinion that the surrounding
parcels within Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan should also be re-
designated from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential to be consistent with the
proposed expansion and other Low-Medium Residential areas within Subarea 16, and
because it is unlikely these parcels will be developed for Industrial Park uses. These
particular parcels are grouped within two separate locations. One of the locations,
which totals 0.7 acres, abuts the 18.5-acre Gdffin Industries parcel to the northeast.
The City-initiated applications include GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04. This
location will be referenced in this staff report as the "north parcels."
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 4
The other location, which is 1.6 acres in size, abuts the 18.5-acre Griffin Industries
parcel to the southeast. Those City-initiated applications include GPA 99-05C, ISPA
99-04, and DDA 99-05. This location will be referenced in this staff report as the "south
parcel." Referto Exhibit "A," which presents the locations of the proposed applications,
Exhibit "B" presents the Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Map.
C. Surroundinq Properties and Land Uses: The property to the north (southwest comer
of Sixth Street and Archibald Avenue) is approximately 18.5 acres in size and is
currently vacant. The property has a land use and zoning designation of Industrial
Park. The uses permitted within this property are industrial. However, Neighborhood
Commercial uses (listed as permitted or conditionally permitted in the Development
Code) may be considered within a 5-acre area at or near the corner of Sixth Street and
Archibald Avenue, subject to approval of a master plan.
The property to the south (northwest corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue) is
approximately 6.2 acres and is currently vacant. However, an Office Professional
project (two office buildings and a health club) is proposed for this parcel. The
proposed uses are permitted under the current zoning designation.
D. Appropriateness of the Proposed Low-Medium Residential Desi~nation: This section
separately evaluates the proposed applications applicable to the Griffin Industries'
parcel, the north parcels, and the south parcel.
Griffin Industries Parcel: The applicant prepared and submitted to the City the
document entitled, "CEQA Consistency Analysis - Cornerpointe Residential
Development Expansion (Exhibit "E"). The document was prepared to evaluate
the fiscal, traffic, and air quality impacts resulting from the Gdffin
Industries-initiated applications. According to the document, the proposed
project will not result in any additional traffic or air quality impacts. Regarding
fiscal implications, the document concludes that under the existing Industrial
Park designation, the parcel will generate a net fiscal surplus to the City of
$54,000 per year. Ifthe parcel is re-designated to Low-Medium Residential, a
$30,000 per year net fiscal surplus will be gained. Though the proposed
applications will result in less net fiscal surplus to the City, the applications will
still result in a positive fiscal gain.
From a land use standpoint, the parcel is sufficient in size and can support the
intended expansion of the abutting Cucamonga Comerpointe residential
development.
· North Parcels: This particular area includes two separate parcels totaling 0.7
acres (10,890 and 15,600 square feet, respectively). Staff believes it is unlikely
that these parcels will be developed for Industrial Park uses in the future for the
following reasons. First, the parcels are small and development of Industrial
Park uses on these parcels will be difficult. Industrial Park uses include offices,
restaurants, and other larger-sized structures. These structures cannot be
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 5
reasonably developed on the small parcels. Secondly, the Industrial Area
Specific Plan requires a 45-foot setback along Archibald Avenue and from
residentially-zoned property, which further reduces the developable area for
each parcel. Thirdly, several residential structures already exist on each parcel.
The proposed re-designation will allow these residential structures to be
consistent with City zoning regulations.
South Parcel: This particular parcel is adequate in size to support Industrial
Park uses. However, similar with the aforementioned north parcels, this parcel
has several residential structures existing onsite, which make industrial
development difficult. Furthermore, one of the structures located onsite, the
Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State Register listing as well
as a potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed re-designation to
Low-Medium Residential ensures the on-site residential structures, including
the Lucas Ranch House, will be consistent with City zoning regulations. The
proposed re-designation is also more compatible with the possible preservation
of the Lucas Ranch House and is in accordance with City policies.
Staff supports Griffin Industries requests and the City-initiated applications. The
applicant's requested applications allow expansion of the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development, provide positive fiscal position to the City, and are consistent
with neighboring areas which are also designated Low-Medium Residential. The
City-initiated applications are also supported by staff. The applications will allow more
effective utilization of the north and south parcels, given their limited size and historic
potential.
E. Appropriateness of the existinq Industrial Park Desiqnation: This section separately
evaluates the existing Industrial Park designation for the Griffin Industries parcel, the
north parcels, and the south parcel.
GriffinlndustriesParceh This particular parcel could be developed under the
existing Industrial Park designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
However, the applicanrs plan to expand the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development could not implemented.
· North Parcels: The two separate parcels comprising this particular area are
too small to adequately support Industrial Park uses. Secondly, the removal of
existing residential structures located onsite would be required.
South Parcel: This particular parcel is adequate in size to support Industrial
Park uses, consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Future
development could be difficult since one of the structures located on the site,
the Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State Register
designation as well as a potential Local Landmark designation placed on it.
Future development would require removal or relocation of this potential
historical structure and removal of other on-site structures.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 6
F. Housinq: The proposed applications will reduce the amount of Industrial Park land
uses in the City and increase Low-Medium Residential uses. The proposed
applications will allow the applicant to expand the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential
development, thereby, providing greater housing diversity for the vicinity and City.
G Planninq Commission: On September 8, 1999, the Planning Commission authorized
staff to file GPA 99-05B and 99~05C. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit "F").
H. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for
Cucamonga Cornerpointe and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996.
The EIR analyzed the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as one of the project alternatives.
However, the El R did not specifically study the conversion of Cucamonga Comerpointe
plus these four parcels to Low-Medium Residential. Consequently, the developer
prepared a CEQA consistency analysis to review the impacts from this project. The
developer used the analysis to complete Part I of the Initial Study and staff has
completed Part II (Exhibit "G"). Staff, based on the information provided by the
developer, has found that the proposed applications will not result in any significant
effect on the environment. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings,
then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes
the Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings regarding these
applications:
A. The properties are suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use and
development district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated
parcels.
B. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor
the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial
Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expected
because of the proposed land use change.
C. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and the
Development Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives
for a residential development.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property
owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
A. Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment
99-05A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development Distdct
Amendment 99-03.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN
October 13, 1999
Page 7
B. Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment
99-05B, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03, and Development District
Amendment 99-04.
C. Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment
99-05C, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04, and Development District
Amendment 99-05.
D. Recommend that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impacts for the above items.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SS\Is
Attached: Exhibit "A" - Location of Proposed Applications
Exhibit "B" - Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Map
Exhibit "C" - General Plan Map
Exhibit "D" - Development Districts Map
Exhibit "E" - CEQA Consistency Analysis-Cornerpointe Residential
Development Expansion (distributed under separate cover)
Exhibit "F"-Minutes from September 8, 1999, Planning Commission
Meeting
Exhibit "G" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II
Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A
Resolution Recommending Approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment
99-02
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment
99-03
Resolution Recommending Approval of Genera Plan Amendment 99-05B
Resolution Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 99-03
Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C
Resolution Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 99-04
Resolution Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment
99-05
FIG. IV-18
.SUIBA~EA ~ ~
Reviled: 11120195
4th
RESIDENTIAL
! ': .....t VERY LOW <2 DU's;'AC
::::::::::::::::::::::::: LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
~: .,,.:::-j LOW-MEDIUM 4-BDU's,/AC
:i:i:i:!:i:~:~?~ MEDIUM 8-~4 DU's/AC
!!!!!i!i!iii~iL~ MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
~ HIGH 24-3o DU's/AC
® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
::.::::::::':iCOMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
!" t NEIGHBORHOOD COMM.
~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
""""""~OFFICE
INDUSTRIAL : -'- "
'INDOSTRIAL
· .727'~..- PARK
,.
~.;r/////,~ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
;r/'/'/7~ HEAVY IND!j'~;TRIAL-z
O~EN ' ' ' ' :::':"""" .....'"
SPACE
F.~, ~HILLSIDE RI~SIDENTIAL
~ OPEN SPACE
~::-:-::~:-:'~FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY conb.
· --'--SPECIAL BOULEVARD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
EE.uH! EXISTING SCHOOLS
:--i ~ PROPOSED SCHOOLS~
"t
· ..,..~ ·
I : 2 ' 3 ;.
' ' ' : ' ;j "~' :" LM
~ '. : ,-,-,"~' '...
· *' """'
'" "
.,: -.. . :;, ~ .
- .; ~ '
, - t - ...-
"· "; *.' * : ' ~.": :. :. '~2 ,'- · ~: ' * ' '
"' *;' . **4TH *: :' ,, j_ __
·-' ' .L~,~-'*':::. , -..--,:. ::' ,. ...'-.. '~: .- .
RESIDENTIAL -. SPECIFIC PLANS ..
~ VERY LOWz2 DU/AC m,~]'INDUSTm~L SPECIFIC PLAN
~ LOW 2-4 DU/AC ~ ~WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
· I
· ' ~ LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU/AC I F,S,P, I FOOTHILL SPECIFIC P~N
~ MEDIUM e-~4 D~AC '
~ MEDIUM'HIGH 14-24 DU/AC
~ HIGH 24-30 DU/AC
CEQA CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
CORNERPOINTE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT EXPANSION
(COPIES AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC
COUNTER)
EXHIBIT "E"
atives are being dealt with through mitigations or have been resolved. She noted there is
a ~ensive resolution with a multitude of requirements for the development.
Chairman been thoroughly considered.
Motion: Moved by rt, seconded by Mannedno, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt
the resolution .~lopment Review 98-10. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERI MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: TOLSTOY
ABSENT: NONE
B. _ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAI~ EL MAP 15320- MWH REALTY,
LTD. - A subdivision of 6.99 acres of land into 2 ;Is in the Industrial Park Development
District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue Street - APN: 209-401-01.
Chairman McNiel observed that the applicant requested a continua to October 13, 1999.
Motion: Moved bY Mannerino, seconded byTolstoy, to continue p~ October13,
1999.
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS ' '
C. AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR THREE
PARCELS IN CONNECTION WITH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - A request to
change the land use and zoning designation from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for land totaling 18.5 acres in size located between 4th and 6th
Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue -APN: 209-062-31.
Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel asked the designations of the surrounding parcels.
Mr. Buller responded that Parcel 17 is Commercial and Parcel 42 is Industrial Park.
Motion: Moved bY Mannerino, secondedbyStewar~,toauthorizestafftofiletwoadditionalGeneral
Plan Amendments to consider the two referenced parcels in conjunction with General Plan
Amendment 99-05A. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
Planning Commission Minut 5 ,1999
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project Files: General Plan Amendments (GPA) 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C, Industrial
Area Specific Plan Amendments (ISPA) 99-02, 99-03, and 99-04, andDevelopment District
Amendments (DDA) 99-03, 99-04, and 99-05.
2. Related Files:
3. Description of Project: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03 propose to change the
land use and zoning designation for an approximately 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park
(Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre). GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04 propose to change the land use
and zoning designation for two parcels (10,890 and 15,600 square feet in size, respectively)
which abut the aforementioned parcel to the north from Industrial Park to Low-Medium
Residential. GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05 also propose to change the land use
and zoning designation for another parcel (1.6 acres in size) which abuts the aforementioned
18.5-acre parcel to the south from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
4. Project Sponsor°s Name and Address: Griffin Industries
Inland Empire Division
9540 Springbrook Court
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park
6. Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the industrial Area Specific Plan
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The parcels are surrounded by vacant land and
single-family residences to the north; the approved Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential
development to the west and vacant land to the south; an industrial park and electrical
substation to the east.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None {~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
~ Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
) Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed: ~
As ' e Planner
September 16, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
Section 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines encourages Lead Agencies to "tier" information from other
previously-prepared Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) while preparing new environmental
documents. Information and findings contained in the following responses are tiered from the
document entitled, "Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR, SCH No.
95112019," prepared by Envicom in July 1996. Another document entitled, "Cornerpointe
Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency Analysis," has also been prepared by
Envicom in August 1999, for the proposed applications. Said document contains updated traffic,
fiscal, and air quality analyses. Information and findings from this document are incorporated by
reference into the following responses, as appropriate.
1. ~ND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) (
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) (X) (
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-d) The Project is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation
(GPA 99-05A)for an 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential in order to expand the cu~ently approved
Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development, which abuts the affected parcel to
the west. The proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation would allow the
affected parcel to be compatible with those neighboring parcels to the west, which are
also designated Low-Medium Residential. The City initiated (GPA 99-05B and 99-05C)
propose to also change the land use and zoning designation for three abutting parcels
from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential, which would establish land use
compatibility with the aforementioned GPA 99-05A. The latter ~o General Plan
Amendment applications are also proposed since it is unlikely that industrial
development could occur on the three parcels affected by the General Plan
Amendments. The ~o parcels to the nodh are limited in size. The Industrial Park
designation requires a 45-foot setback along Archibald Avenue and from residentially
zoned prope~y. Therefore, to develop these ~o parcels under the current land use and
zoning designation, approval of variances would be required. The parcel to the south
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 4
is adequate in size to be developed with an industrial use; however, one of the
structures on the parcel, the Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State
Register designation as well as a potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed
applications ensure that conflicts with local policies and regulations will not result.
Signfficant
Impact Less
Issues and Supporling Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposah
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-c) The proposed project will not result in any residential development that would
significantly increase population, Displacement will not occur.
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: S~gnif~cant
Impact Less
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 5
Comments:
a-i) The affected parcels are net characterized by seismic hazards any more than any other
area in seismically active Southern California. Compliance with standard Uniform
Building Code and City regulations and requirements ensures that significant geologic
and seismic hazards will not result.
Potentially
Ssgn~ficant
Impact Less
Potentlaity Unless Than
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, erthe
rate and amount of surface water runoff? (X)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)? (X)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (X)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? (X)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (X)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?. (X)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (X)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? (X)
Comments:
a-i) The proposed applications will not result in any significant changes ~n absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or rates or amount of surface runoff. The developer is required to
submit plans to the Engineering Division to ensure the affected parcels are afforded
adequate drainage services.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page Fi
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) (X)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-d) The "Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR, SCH
No. 95112019," prepared by Envicom in July 1996, concluded that significant shod-term
construction and long-term operational air quality impacts would result with the originally
proposed 1996 Cornerpointe residential development. To offset these significant
impacts, the City approved a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The document
entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency
Analysis," also prepared by Envicom in August 1999 for the proposed applications, now
concludes that the proposed expansion of the Cornerpointe residential development
would not result in any significant impact sin~ the proposed expansion represents a
less intensive development scenario than previously approved in 1996. The project is
not of a scale or land use that would significantly alter regional climate or create
objectionable odors.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal
result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (×)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 7
Potentially
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-g) The document entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA
Consistency Analysis" prepared by Envicom in August 1999 for the proposed
applications, contains a traffic study prepared by WPA Traffic Engineering. The traffic
study concludes that the proposed expansion of the Cornerpointe residential
development would generate about 250 ~o-way peak hour trips and 75 and 95 morning
and evening peak hour trips, respectively. The number of trips generated represents
only 33 percent of the morning peak hour trips and 38 percent of the evening peak hour
trips necessa~ to require a traffic impact study under the Congestion Management
Program guidelines. Therefore, WPA concludes that the proposed project will not result
in any significant traffic impacts. The applicant is required to comply with City
Engineering regulations and standards to ensure hazards associated with access, ent~,
and turning movements will not occur. Parking will be provided in accordance with City
requirements. The project is not of a scale that would conflict with alternative
tmnspo~ation requirements. Rail and air traffic will not be affected.
Potentially
S~3nfficant
Impac[ Less
Potentially Unless Than
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their.
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) (X)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal
pool)? ( ) (X)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-e) The Industrial Area Specific Plan area is located near the City's gateway entry. The
entire vicinity is therefore intended for future development and is not characterized by
any sensitive or significant biological resources.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page
Signfficant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si nt SI nt
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy consedation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the ragion
and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-c) The proposed applications am not of a land use or scale that would result in any
significant impacts associated with energy and mineral msoumes.
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-e) The proposed applications are not of a land use or scale that would result in any
significant impacts associated with potential health hazards.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 9
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b) The proposed applications include changes to land use and zoning designations from
Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. No increase in noise levels is anticipated
as a result of the proposed land use changes. Residential uses typically generate less
noise than Industrial uses.
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
ct
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) According to the document entitled, "Comerpointe Residential Development Expansion,
CEQA Consistency Analysis" prepared by Envicom in August 1999, adequate fire
protection services will be provided. This conclusion is rendered because Subarea 16
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan area is now within a Mello-Roos District which will
create a positive cash flow to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
b) Likewise, the 1999 Envicom report concludes that police protection services will be
adequate to service the proposed applications, since the San Bernardino Sheriffs
Department has recently increased its number of sworn officers.
c-e) The proposed applications are not of a scale or magnitude that will significantly impact
schools, maintenance of facilities, or other services.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 10
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SySTEMS. Would the proposal
result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-g) The ProPosed aPPlications are not expected to have any adverse effects on utilities and
se~ice systems. The applicant is required to comply with City engineering requirements
and standards to ensure that future development is afforded adequate utilities and
se~jces.
Signffmenl
Impec~ Less
Potentially Unless Than
Issues and Supporling Information Sources: S nt Si nt
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ( ) (X) ( )
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ( ) (X) ( )
c) Create light or glare? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b) The corner ofArchibald Avenue and 4th Street is the City,s gateway entry and therefore,
is a sensitive location from a visual and aesthetic standpoint. The proposed project is
approximately 600 feet no~lh of the intersection; therefore, no aesthetic impacts are
expected. The developer is required to comply with appropriate development and
design standards of the City to ensure that future development is designed in a visually
pleasing manner.
c) The proposed applications will not result in any development of a land use or scale that
would create significant light and/or glare impacts.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 11
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) (X)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) (×)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b/
d-e) The Industrial Area Specific Plan area is located near the City's gateway entry. The
entire vicinity is therefore, intended for future development and is not characterized by
any sensitive or significant cultural resources.
c) GPA 99-05C proposes to change land use and zoning from Industrial Park to Low-
Medium Residential for a parcel that has an existing structure on it, the Lucas Ranch
House, that has a Potential National and State Register designation as well as a
potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed project would allow the structure
to be consistent with the proposed zoning designation; Therefore, the impact to this
potential historical resource is considered positive.
Potentially
Potentially Unless Than
15. RECREATION. Would the proposak
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Affect existing recreational oppo~unities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b) The proposed project may increase the demand on parks in the area. The project
applicant will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit
issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 12
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE,
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate impo~ant examples of the major
periods of California histo~ or prehisto~? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Shoff term: Does the project have the potential to
achieve shod-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A sho~-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ) (X)
d) Subs~ntial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effe~s which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either dire~ly or
indirectly? ( ) ( ) ) (X)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices. 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(x)Genera~ Plan Environmental Impact Report
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 13
(x) Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR
(SCH #95112019, certified July 1996)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 2fO9f and 2f092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: General Plan Amendments (GPA) 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C; Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendments (ISPA) 99-02, 99-03, AND 99-04; and Development District Amendments
(DDA) 99-03, 99-04, AND 99-05
Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999
Project Applicant: Griffin Industries and City of Rancho Cucamonga
Project Location (also see attached map): Located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west
side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31, 10, 28, and 34.
Project Description: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03 propose to change the land use and
zoning designation for an approximately 18.5-acre parcel from Industdal Park (Subarea 16) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). GPA 9g-05B,
ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for two parcels
(10,890 and 15,600 square feet in size, respectively) which abut the aforementioned parcel to the north
from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05 also
propose to change the land use and zoning designation for another parcel (1.6 acres in size) which abuts
the aforementioned 18.5-acre parcel to the south from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted
an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax {909~ 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
(Date City Council adopts Neqative Declaration)
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5
ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM R ESI DENTIAL (4-
8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND
SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-31
A. Recitals.
1. Gdffin Industries has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05A as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannin9
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately
18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side
of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial
Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendmentwould not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. · Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project. there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A to change
the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'FI'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
F-A," 3/
RESIDENTIAL ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::
~..-:::-:::-.i VERY LOW < 2 DU's/AC
:::::::::::::::::::::::: LOW 2-4 DU'S/AC "22222'
~:...,,.,:,.:.:.t LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DU's./AC """""'
~ MEDIUM 8-~4 DU's/AC. ,
i~ii':~-=-:','.;-".:=iMEDIUM-HIGH 14'24 DU's/AC
~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL J 6th
~:-: ::::::::'COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
i - ~NEIGHBORHOOD COMM.
~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
::::::::::::;OFFICE
INDUSTRIAL :. ,.. ~._
'.FY'/7~,'-INDi2S'fRIAL PARK
~ GENERAL INDUSTRI~,L
· ' ,'.-
?'7/7/7~ HE~,VY INDUSTRIAL'
-- >
OF;E!~'SPACE" '. ~'!"""' ......' "
.'-:,--:!~,':~ HILLSIDE REFSIDENTIAL
'~ OPEN SPACE "
:'-':':-::-::~:-::~ FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD.
~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
!E.'J. Hi EXISTING SCHOOLS
:--.'i ,,. PROPOSED SCHOOLS~
"::":"
, '-, CIVIC/COMMUNITY
CITY OF RANCHO.CUCAMONGA
PLANi'qlFIS!Di~ISION Exhi'~it: /~ Date:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A
REQUESTTO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM
SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED
BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
- APN: 210-062-31.
A. Recitals.
1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment
99-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals.
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres,
located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently
vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The proper~y to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan
Amendment 99-05A and Development District Amendment 99-03, which re-designate the subject
site to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and
d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and related development; and
e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not
result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial
Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits. and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the
public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02
removing 18.5 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of
Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 in the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO
CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR
APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK
(SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED
BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALDAVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF
- APN: 210-062-31
A. Recitals.
1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-03
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the
property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Amhibald Avenue and also
to remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16).
4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE. it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately
18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side
of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial
Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Comerpointe residential project, The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industdal uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A and
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the
adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05A.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that thero is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therofore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects
that will result if the project is approved.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES
October 13, 1999
Page 3
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project. there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration. the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment No. 99-03 to
change the zoning designation for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre). as shown on the attached Exhibit "B."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed. and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING
0.7 ACRE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE
INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-
8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND
SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-28 AND 34
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment
99-05B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acres,
with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald
Avenue which are presently improved with residential structures. Said parcels are currently
designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application. the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
therounder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits. and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the
public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B to change
the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
-/:-A,'
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESIDENTIAL ~j ;'.'-""" ';'-'.:.
,,-.::=, j VERY LOW <2 DU's/AC
::::::::::::::::::::::::: LOW 2-4 DU's/AC .':
~=.-..~i-i:i,i.,-I LOW-MEDIUM 4-aDU's/AC
:!:i:!:!:!:!:i:i:~ MEDIUM 8q4 DU's/AC
i-''-''-=-''.=.~.''.'':.MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
e MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
~ 6th
~ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
i - ~ NEIGHBORJ-IOOD COMM.
~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
::::::::::::: OFFICE
INDUSTRIAL '
· .F/'Z2~,'-IND:DS'I:RIAL 'PARK
F-;'~/--'//~ GEI~,/ERAL INbUSTRIAL
~ HEAVY INDU'~;TRIAL ';
OF;EN'SPACE"' ~'~:':" ..... ' ' " . 'F Y2'-O r_.-
~'--:~+:~-~HILLSIDE RE~SIDENTIAL
~ OPEN SPACE ,
~:':-:s~:.::_::FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD.
~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
~-=j.H~ EXISTING SCHOOLS
:.'i '. . PROPOSED SCHOOLS
.... · ......
,_. ~. , - ..
CITY OF R~F~O:~8~AMONGA
........ :::~'"""~"*::=
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A
REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE
FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN,
LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST
SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific
Plan Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre of
land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and are
presently improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently zoned as industrial
Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject parcels is designated Industrial Park (Subarea
16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 2
c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan
Amendment 99-05B and Development District Amendment 99-04, which re-designate the subject
parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and
d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and related development; and
e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
f. This amendment would not be mateddally injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not
result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial
Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project. no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03
removing two parcels totaling 0.7 acre of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the
west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
1, Brad Buller. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TVVO
PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK
(SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED
BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF
- APN: 210-062-28 AND 34
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Distdct
Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution. the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the
property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also
to remove said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16).
4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre, with
rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archiba. ld
Avenue which are improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently designated
as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
DDA 99-04- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
O~oberl3, 1999
Page 2
b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential project, The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industdal Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B and
Industrial Area Specific Plan 99-03; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the
adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05B.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects
that will result if the project is approved.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DDA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Distdct Amendment 99-04 to
change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "B."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'I'rEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, BraCl Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6
ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE
INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-
8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND
SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment
99-05C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff repods, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres,
with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald
Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said parcel is currently designated
as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05C o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the 9oals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding propedies; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration.
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Furlher, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the
public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
-.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 abo~;'e,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C to change
the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A]'rEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESI D E NTIA L ~ :':': ':':':':':':':':'::~ :'
~' "'::.='l VERY LOW <2 DU"s/AC
:::::::::::::::::::::::LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
i:.-.~,-~:,i-,iLOW-MEDIUM 4-BDU's/AC
:!:!:!:!:!:i:i:i:JMEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC.
i.-','~-'--'~.-:,'.=i--'!!.~MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
COMMERCIAL ] 6th
'....:...-.:-:,COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
:- J NEIGHBOR.HOOD COMM.
~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
...
INDUSTRIAL ' :.... '- .'
· .7Z'77~,'-INDYJS'I:RIAL' PARK
-.x,r//////x, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ·r__,pA ~'f'-O~'A
T/Zf/Tj HEAVY I~DUSTRIAL'. "" :. > m ~,r~
OPEN SPACE .,
,-,,;-. HILLSIDE R~SIDENTIAL
'~ OPEN SPACE"
:-'{::':-::::*::-:: FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD.
SPECIAL BOULEVARD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
..;-=,...Hi EXISTING SCHOOLS
:--.'i-'.: PROPOSED SCHOOLS
,-'::-"'-'
, '. ~ CIVIC/COMMUNITY
....... '" ......F-A/5¢
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
I N DUSTRIAL AREA` SPECI FIG PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, REQU ESTI NG
TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA' 16 OF THE
INDUSTRIALAREASPECIFIC PLAN MAP, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH
AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to 1.6 acres of land, located between Fourth and Sixth
Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures.
Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan;
and
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and -.
c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan
Amendment 99-05C and Development District Amendment 99-05, which re-designate the subject
parcels to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 2
d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and with related development; and
e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not
result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area
Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the
surrounding properties than would be. expected under the existing land use designation.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the
proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04
removing from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, 1.6 acres of land located '-
between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
ISPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
AI'rEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
F-A/S7
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE
PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16)
IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN
FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
210-062-10
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District
Amendment 99-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe
residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The
Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire
block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential.
3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
recomm'ended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and
also remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16).
4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as foIIows:
a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately
1.6 acres, with rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side
of Archibald Avenue and is improved with residential structures. Said property is ~:urrently -.
designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)
in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 2
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga
Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial
(Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The
property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific
Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General
Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C and
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
propedies.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headrig and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and
2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access. size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the
adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05C.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative ~
Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council
adopt a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based
upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to
the application.
b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects
that will result if the project is approved.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code '-
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, '-
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse im pact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 13, 1999
Page 3
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment 99-05 to
change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "B."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY Of OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel. Chairman
A'I'I'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I. Brad Buffer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote*to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-32 - SUNRISE
ASSISTED LIVING: The proposed development of a an 88-bed, 59-suite, senior
assisted living facility on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional District, located
at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road -APN: 208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-
018. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 99-30 and Pre-Application Review 98-13
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Commercial, General Commercial District
South - Residential. Low District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East - Residential, Low District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West - Residence, Office Professional District
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Office
North - Commercial
South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
West Office
C. Site Characteristics: The subject site consists of three parcels totaling 2.8 acres, and slopes
from north to south at approximately 3 percent. The site presently contains a nonconforming
residence that will be demolished and removed. The site borders residences to the west, south,
and east.
D. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use of Beds Ratio Required Provided
Assisted Living 88 1/4 beds 22 22
ANALYSIS:
A. Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Review workshop on January
27, 1999. At that time, the applicant only had the easterly parcel consisting of 1.5 acres, and
presented a Mediterranean style of architecture. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit
"G"). Since that time, Sundse has acquired two additional parcels creating a larger site area.
ITEH 0
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING
October 13, 1999
Page 2
The additional acreage allows the building to be rotated so its main entrance faces Base Line
Road and provides significantly better circulation. Sunrise also revised its architecture to a
Shingle style. Sunrise conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 27, 1999, at the Lions
Center, which was attended by most of the adjoining residential property owners. Sunrise
elaborated on the nature of its operations and presented a colored rendering of the wood-
shingle two-story building. Neighbors in attendance were pleased with the architectural
design and indicated a willingness to work with Sunrise to replace existing wood fences
around the project site. The wood shingle wall cladding was later modified to wood siding, in
response to concerns of maintenance and weathering (see Section" D" below).
B. General: The proposed assisted living facility is a permitted use in the Office Professional
District. The project will have 59 suites with 88 beds. Residents in the assisted living facility
are generally in good health and ambulatory, but maintain different levels of self-sufficiency
and require personal care assistance. There is a central dining room, television and activity
room, sunroom, and parlor. An Alzheimer's special care area is located in a separate self-
contained unit in the eastern portion of the facility. It is fully secure with its own garden area
and state of the art electronic controls.
The site is located where Amethyst Avenue terminates at Base Line Road and essentially acts
as an end point of the Alta Loma historical district. The proposed Craftsman style architecture
is designed to be in keeping with nearby historical buildings. The building includes wood
siding as the dominant extedor wall cladding, with shingle accents on turrets, exposed rafter
tails, gable end detailing, brackets, and cobble wainscoting along lower levels of the structure.
There are three covered porches along the front elevation, a courtyard with two trellis
structures in the rear, and a continuous walking path around the building for residents and
their guests.
Sunrise is providing an access easement so that the existing residence to the west will retain
existing access to Base Line Road through the subject site at the traffic signal at Amethyst
Street. The southerly one-half acre of the site, which is zoned Low Residential, will be planted
as a meadow.
C. Tree Removal Permit: The site contains 26 trees consisting of fruit trees, pepper trees, and
individual eucalyptus trees, according to the arborist's report. The three healthy trees in the
meadow will be preserved in place; the remaining trees will be removed due to conflicts with
grading and construction. The applicant is providing over 90 new trees of vadous species,
including a mature Magnolia tree (60-inch box) in the turning circle at the front.
D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed
the project on August 31 and October 5, 1999. At the August 31 meeting, the Committee
expressed concern regarding how climate and wind would affect ongoing maintenance
associated with wood shingles on large wall areas. The Committee discussed alternative
architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Spanish Revival, and Craftsman. The
Committee noted that nearby Amethyst Avenue is part of the historical district of Alta Loma.
The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an architectural style, which would be in
keeping with the nearby historical buildings. On October 5, 1999, the Committee reviewed
the Craftsman style using predominately wood siding as the exterior wall material and
recommended approval. (See Exhibit "H").
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING
October 13, 1999
Page 3
E. Technical/Grading Review Committees: The Committees have reviewed the project and
recommend approval with conditions.
F. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has
completed Part II. Staff has found that there may be a significant noise impact caused by
traffic on Baseline Avenue. The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City
standards, which requires a study of noise reduction mitigation measures to be included in the
construction design, such as special window glazing. Therefore, a condition of approval is
recommended to require an acoustical report prior to the issuance of building permits. The
removal of 23 out of 26 existing trees is mitigated because the project landscape design
includes planting of 90 trees. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then
issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the
property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the
project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Review 99-32 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and
issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
BB:RVB\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G' - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 27, 1999
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated August 31, 1999
and October 5, 1999
Exhibit "1" - Initial Study
Resolution of Approval with conditions
~ SITE UTILIZATION MAP
~ ~ SUNRISE - RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.....5, ' · ' ' "~': ''~ "'~' ' CALIFORNIA
., T.-_-_j ~ T T
/
/ ZONING LEGEND,
GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL
'/ H HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
L LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
~ MEDIUM HiGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
~ OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL
~ SENIOR HOUSING - RESIDENTIAL
I_~DR 99*32
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN DR99o32
SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · -C,;-,'.5~:-. iiii[~';=_ d~ ~ ~t;'-4'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
January 27, 1999
Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart,
Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Dan James, Senior
Civil Engineer; Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
NEW BUSINESS
A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-13 - SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT - The proposed
development of a 59-bed assisted living facility for senior citizens on a 1.5 acre site located
at 9519 Base Line Road in the Office Professional District - APN: 208-541-01.
Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the purpose of the pre-application review process. He
introduced the Sunrise Development project and requested that the applicant describe the nature
of the proposed assisted living facility and its development plan.
Wolfgang Hack, project architect, introduced Bill Herrick, Sunrise Development, and David Wagner,
civil engineer. Mr. Hack described the goals of Sunrise and its desire to provide a high quality
facility with a strong residential character. He stated most residents are generally in good health
and ambulatory, but require assistance in cooking or personal care. He presented the site plan,
described the architectural features, and presented photographs of a newly-constructed Sunrise
facility.
Mr. Herrick explained the differences between acute care, skilled nursing and assisted living. He
said assisted living patients are mostly ambulatory and almost, but not quite, functional in daily
activities. He indicated some are at a stage of life where they do not really need, but desire, to
have extra care.
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner, stated the use is consistent with the zoning and staff does
not have any major issues with the project. She noted the applicant filed a preliminary review so
the technical issues have been identified and forwarded to the applicant. She indicated the site is
within a small Office-Professional island surrounded by residential. She pointed out the parcels
to the west are awkward shaped lots such that a master plan of access will be requested.
Chairman McNiel asked the applicant to describe the rooms and kitchen arrangements.
Mr. Hack explained rooms are single or double bedroom, have a small refrigerator, but do not have
kitchens. He said there is a main dining room for all residents, and a smaller, informal activity area
which would have cereal and snacks for more flexibility.
Commissioner Stewart asked how many Aizheimer and dementia patients are accommodated.
Mr. Hack stated it is a small group, about 15 patients. He indicated the area is an outdoor area
secured for their protection.
Commissioner Macias asked about the tenancy of the facility.
Mr. Hack replied it is month-to-month rentals ranging from about $1,800 to $3,000 a month
depending upon room and care.
Commissioner Stewart asked what attracted Sunrise to this site.
Mr. Herrick stated in addition to size and availability of land, it involves the demographics of
qualified care-givers, such as the sons and daughters that care for their parents, and the qualified
seniors.
The Planning Commission discussed the need to ensure the compatibility between the assisted
care facility and the residential neighborhood, as well as the personal safety of patients with traffic
on Base Line Road. The Commission said a neighborhood meeting would be beneficial if the
applicant decides to submit a formal application.
Mr. Bullet summarized the discussion. He stated he did not hear issues with the proposed design
that could not be addressed. He said a master plan and neighborhood meeting will be requested.
He indicated the architecture is moving in the right direction.
The Sunrise development team thanked the Commission for its comments.
B. VICTORIA ARBORS (FORMERLY VICTORIA LAKES) - AMERICAN
~MENT CO. - An overview of the proposed land use and devele
Victoria within the Victoria Community Plan on appi;oximately of land,
generally Base Line Road, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day
Creek Channel 13 through 18, 22, 28 thro and 36; 222-201-33;
227-161-33, 35, 36, and 227-171-08, 11, 12, 14,: and 23.
Brad Buller, City Planner, purpose c ~ was for discussion only and
not for decision making.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented
Mr. Buller summarized the ' s: the treatment for the winery given the
unknown development site; the inherent s between single family
residential the commercial development to the freeway; the
appropriateness ~ }commercially zoned land for r~ vest side
the lack of community facility within the ~ change from office
zoned residential development within the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
McNiel opened the meeting for public comment.
PC Adjourned Minutes -2- January 27, 1999
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Rebecca Van Buren August 31, 1999
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-32 o SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING: The proposed development of
a 88-bed, 59 suite, senior assisted living facility on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional
District, located at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road - APN: 208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-
018. Related File: Pre-Application Review 98-13.
Backqround: Sunrise Assisted Living presented preliminary concepts of an assisted living facility
on the eastern 1.5 acres of the site in a Pre-Application Review on January 27, 1999. Since that
time, Sunrise has acquired two additional parcels to create a larger site area. The additional
acreage allows the building to be rotated so its main entrance faces Base Line Road and provides
significantly better circulation. Sunrise conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 27, 1999 at the
Lions Center, which was attended by most adjoining residential properly owners.
Design Parameters: The subject site is 2.6 acres of vacant land, surrounded to the east and south
by residential dwellings in residential districts. To the west is an existing residence in the Office
Professional District. Sunrise is providing an access easement so that the existing residence to
the west will access Base Line Road through the subject site at the traffic signal at Amethyst Street.
The facility has been designed to comply with height restrictions adjoining residential districts and
has provided landscaping, which is sensitive to the residential neighborhood.
The southerly one-half acre of the site, called out as a meadow on the Landscape Plan, is not
planned for development at this time. This area may be transferred to the westerly property owner
in conjunction with a future office professional use, developed as a future expansion area for the
assisted living facility, or possibly incorporated into a residential infill project. All future
opportunities are dependent upon various zoning, general plan and property consolidation
considerations.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Since the Pre-Application Review, during which the Planning Commission had no
comments on the architecture, the applicant has completely changed the architectural style
from Mediterranean (stucco with Spanish tile roof) to Craftsman (wood shingle siding with
asphalt shingle roof). The proposed roof material is asphalt shingle, which is consistent
with the Craftsman architectural style of the building. The Planning Commission policy is
to require tile roof material; however, the Commission has allowed a heavy "architectural"
asphalt shingle on a case-by-case basis.
2. The exterior walls are proposed to be wood shingle, an attractive element that requires
diligent maintenance to retain its beauty and integrity over the years. Alternate materials,
which are suited to the arid climate, may be explored to create a similar architectural effect
(siding).
3. Replace plaster wall finish on south elevation with wood shingle siding.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Use wood shingle siding within gable at main entry on north elevation.
"H"
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING
August 31, 1999
Page 2
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee approve the project
subject to the modifications as recommended above.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewad, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Rebecca Van Buren
The Committee expressed concern regarding the climate, wind, and ongoing maintenance
associated with wood shingles on large wall areas. The Committee stated they would not support
asphalt shingles on a building of this scale and prominence. The Committee discussed alternative
architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Spanish Revival, Craftsman with similar but limited
shingle applications, and Craftsman with siding, river rock, and shingles. The Committee noted
that nearby Amethyst Avenue is part of historical district of Alta Loma. The site is located where
Amethyst Avenue terminates at Base Line Road and essentially acts as an end point of the
historical district. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an architectural style, which
would be in keeping with the nearby historical buildings and use siding, river rock, and a limited
application of wood shingles. The Committee referenced the design of Fire Station No. 3 on
Banyan Avenue as an example of a Craftsman style using durable and appropriate materials. The
applicant requested a continuance to explore suggested architectural styles.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Rebecca Van Buren October 5, 1999
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING: The proposed development of
a 88-bed, 59 suite, senior assisted living facility on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional
District, located at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road - APN: 208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-
018. Related File: Pre-Application Review 98-13.
Background: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on August 31,1999. At that time,
the exterior walls were predominantly wood shingle, an attractive element that requires diligent
maintenance to retain its beauty and integrity over the years. The Committee expressed concern
regarding the climate, wind, and ongoing maintenance associated with wood shingles on large wall
areas. The Committee discussed alternative architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Spanish
Revival, Craftsman with similar but limited shingle applications, and Craftsman with siding, river rock,
and shingles. The Committee noted that nearby Amethyst Avenue is part of the historical district of
Alta Loma. The site is located where Amethyst Avenue terminates at Base Line Road and
essentially acts as an end point of the historical district. The Committee encouraged the applicant
to explore an architectural style, which would be in keeping with the nearby historical buildings and
use siding, river rock, and a limited application of wood shingles.
The applicant has revised plans in accordance with the Committee's direction. The predominant
exterior wall covering is wood siding, with limited shingle in accent areas, and a concrete tile roof.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide river rock wainscot for all sides of the building.
2. Provide heavy duty lumber size for architectural elements such as but not limited to exposed
rafter tails, corbels, wood beams, columns, wood railings, wood trim around the windows, etc.
3. Change the proposed one by redwood lattice to a heavier size.
4. Provide additional siding to building walls at the south, north, and east elevations.
5. Add slump block enclosure around emergency generator and transformer.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee approve the project
subject to the modifications as recommended above.
Attachment
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Rebecca Van Buren
Staff stated the above comments are addressed n the revised colored elevations. The Committee
recommended approval of the project with the following:
1. Expand the river rock wainscoting on the south elevation at the west end of the building.
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING
October 5, 1999
Page 2
2. Provide architectural details of lumber sizes, river rock/window sill transitions, and width of
wood siding in plan check.
3. Add river rock pilasters to perimeter wall.
4. Increase decorative paving at entry circle.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development Review 99-32
2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review 98-13
3. Description of Project:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-32 - SUNRISE
ASSISTED LIVING - The proposed development of a 88-bed, 59 suite, senior assisted
living facility on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional District, located at 9515 and
9519 Base Line Road - APN: 208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-018.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Sunrise Assisted Living
22422 Shady Elm Terrace
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
5. General Plan Designation: Office
6. Zoning: Office Professional
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Commercial development to the north, residential
to the south and east, and a residence and vacant land to the west.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rebecca Van Buren, AICP
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Livin~ Pa,c]e ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
(~) Population and Housing (~') Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resoumes
( ) Air Quality (V') Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed: (,~ Y~,-(~ ~ V~,(~,~_._.'
· \ R~becca Van Buren, AICP
Associate Planner
September 16, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Livin~l Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
Significant
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.'
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
The proposed use is a permitted use pursuant to the Office Professional District of the
City's Development Code. The proposed project is in conformance with applicable
development standards.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.'
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) (~')
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) (t/) ( )
Comments:
c) The proposed project involves demolition of one non-conforming single family
residence that exists on the subject site; however, the project will replace this use
with a 88-bed, 59 suite assisted living facility.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Pa~le 4
Issues and SupCoffing information Sources: Significanl
Imoact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Imoacl I ct
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ) (v')
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ) (v')
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ) (v')
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ( ) (~,)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ( ) (~/)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) (~/)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) (v')
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Page 5
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Potentially
5. ~R QUALI~. Would the proposah
a) Violate any air quali~ standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quali~ violinion? ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) (~)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) (~)
6. TR~SPORTATIO~CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal resu~ in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Hazards to safeW from design features (e.g.,
sha~ cu~es or dangerous inters~tions) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Insufficient parking capaciW on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies suppoding
alternative tmnspo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle rocks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Rail or air traffic impads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
Comments:
b & c) To the west is an existing residence in the Office Professional Distri~. Sunrise
Assisted Living is providing an access easement so that the existing residence to
the west will access Base Line Road through the subject site at the traffic signal at
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Pa~le 6
Amethyst Street. As a result, the proposed project ameliorates an existing traffic
conflict.
S~gnificant
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) (~)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) (~)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) (~)
Comments:
b) The project involves the removal of 23 of the 26 trees on site. The applicant
submi~ed an arborists repo~ (Sumuel L. Knapp, August 1999) which provides an
invento~ of the trees. The repo~ states the trees are remnant agriculture and old
neglected residential planrings. The applicant is requir~ to obtain a Tree Removal
Permit and provide replacement trees. The applicant is proposing to provide over
90 new trees of various species, including a specimen magnolia tree (60-inch box)
in the turning circle at the front. A Condition of Approval will require installation
of all tr~s shown on the landscape plan prior to final of building permits.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposah
a) Conflict with adopted energy consedation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
c) Result in the loss of availabili~ of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Pacje 7
Potentially
Significant
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ( ) )
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ( ) )
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ( ) ) (v')
d) Exposure of people to existing sourues of
potential health hazards? ( ( ) ) (V')
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( )
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( () ) (~/)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( (V') ) 0
Comments:
b) The General Plan indicates noise level of 65Ldn along Base Line Road; therefore
a noise study is required to address noise levels and identify adequate mitigation.
The project site is located at the border of the 65 Ldn noise contour, where
mitigation is available using conventional construction, but with closed windows and
fresh air supply systems or air conditioningpursuant to the recommendations of an
acoustical engineer. A Condition of Approval will require submittal of such a
report for review and approval of the City Planner and incorporation of noise
reduction measures prior to issuance of building permits.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Page
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( )
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) (f)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) (f)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (~)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic (~)
effect?
c) Create light or glare? (~)
',.,,__,.,,.% ,
14, CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) (V)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) (f)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Living Pacje 9
Significant
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
15. RECREATION. Would the proposak
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
I
16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE,
a) Potential to degrade: Does the proje~ have
the potential to degrade the quali~ of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
communi~, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California histo~ or prehisto~? ) ( ) ( ) (V)
b) Shod term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve sho~-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A sho~-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Assisted Livin~l Page 10
Significant
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( )
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, prog ram El R, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all
that apply):
(~/) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981 )
(V') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or propos..a~ and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the'effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would
OCCUr. .
Signature: ~ Date:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
· NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development Review 99-32 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999
Project Name: Project Applicant: Sunrise Assisted Living
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road - APN:
208-541-01,208-432-017, and 208-432-018.
Project Description: The proposed development of an 88-bed, 59 suite, senior assisted living facility on
2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional District.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment·
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required, Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 13, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-32 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 99-30 FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF AN 88-BED, 59 SUITE, SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY ON 2.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL
DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9515 AND 9519 BASE LINE ROAD, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-541-01,
208-432-017, and 208-432-018
A. Recitals.
1. Sunrise Development, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development
Review No. 99-32 and Tree Removal Permit 99-30, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the
application."
2. On the 13th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set foffh in the Recitals,
Pa~ A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road
with a street frontage of 327 feet on Base Line Road and lot depth of 455 feet and is presently
contains a non-conforming residence and vacant land; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is commercial, the property to the
south is residential, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is
office/professional containing a nonconforming residence; and
c. The Office Professional District allows convalescent facilities as a permitted use
in the District. The proposed residential assisted living facility qualifies as a convalescent facility
and a permitted use in the Office Professional District; and
d. The project will comply with all applicable provisions of Office Professional District,
including minimum site area, height limitations, setbacks, landscaping, and parking. The project
consolidates 3 parcels to form a single parcel containing 2.6 acres, which exceeds the minimum
site area of 40,000 square feet. The project complies with the 45-foot building setback from Base
Line Road. 20-foot building setback from residential districts, and 10-foot parking and landscaping
setbacks from residential districts. The building does not exceed 25 feet in height within 100 feet
of the residential district to the east and south, and is 30 feet in height in its central area, which
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT
October 13, 1999
Page 2
complies with the 40-foot maximum height allowed in the Office Professional District. The project
provides 22 parking spaces including a van-accessible space in compliance with the parking
provisions of the Development Code.
e. The project is designed to be compatible with surrounding development and
provide a high degree of aesthetic appeal. The proposed Craftsman style architecture is designed
to be in keeping with nearby historical buildings in the Alta Loma historical district. The building
includes wood siding as the dominant exterior wall cladding, with shingle accents on turrets,
exposed rafter tails, gable end detailing, brackets, and cobble wainscoting along lower levels of
the structure. There are three covered porches along the front elevation. a courtyard with two
trellis structures in the rear, and a continuous walking path around building for residents and their
guests. The project provides an access easement so that the existing residence to the west will
retain existing access to Base Line Road through the subject site at the traffic signal at Amethyst
Street.
f. The proposed use is in accordance with the goal of the General Plan to provide
a full range of housing opportunities.
g. The proposed residential assisted living facility use will provide a needed service
to eldedy residents of the community.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan;
and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the Office Professional district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto. will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT
October 13, 1999
Page 3
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above.
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions. attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division
1 ) The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a lot line adjustment
to contain the development on a single lot prior to issuance of building
permits.
2) The applicant shall plant trees in accordance with the Base Line Road
Beautification Master Plan. Foreground trees shall include Magnolia
grandiflora 'Samuel Sommer,' background trees include Liquidambar
Styracifiua 'Festival,' and accenttrees include Lagerstromemia Indica
'Natchez.' The applicant shall modify landscape and irrigation plans
accordingly prior to issuance of permits.
3) The parking stalls at the southern boundary shall be redesigned so
that vehicle headlights shall not create glare over the 6-foot high
boundary wall that separates residential uses from the proposed use.
Revisions, which may include Iowedng grade or planting dense
evergreen landscaping, shall be made on grading plans subject to the
review of the City Planner pdor to issuance of grading permits.
4) Elevations shall be modified to include additional river rock
wainscoting on the southern elevation at the west end of the building.
Revisions shall be shown on construction drawings submitted for plan
check.
5) Construction drawings submitted for plan check shall provide
architectural details including the width of wood siding on exterior
walls, the transition bek, veen the river rock wainscot and window sills,
and the lumber size for rafter rails, corbels, wood beams, columns
wood railings, and lattice elements.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT
October 13, 1999
Page 4
6) The perimeter slump block wall shall include river rock pilasters at key
areas to complement rock treatment on building elevations. Pilasters
shall be shown on construction drawings submitted for plan check
subject to the review and approval of the City Planer priorto issuance
of building permits.
7) The decorative paving in the entry circle shall be expanded.
Revisions shall be shown on landscape plans subject to the review
and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits.
En,qineerinq Division
1) The applicant shall modify the eastbound traffic signing and striping
to provide a Bus Bay to current City Standard.
2) The applicant shall install street lights and street trees per City
Standard.
3) The applicant shall modify the Base Line Road/Amethyst Street traffic
signal as required and provide apprepdate easement for maintenance
of the traffic signal loop in south approach leg of driveway approach.
4) The applicant shall revise City Drawing No.1168 to include the new
improvements.
5) Staff supports going before the City Council for acceptance of the
drainage easement at the southeast comer. If it is approved by the
City Council, the acceptance will be before building permits. The
drainage facilities shall be piped to Klusman Avenue and secondary
surface facilities provided, all as determined by the City Engineer. A
maintenance agreement for the drainage easement is required.
6) An in- lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding
(talecommunications) on the opposite side of the street (Base Line
Road) shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building
permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit times the
length of the project frontage.
7) The applicant shall remove telephone pole on the west side of the
driveway approach, if possible.
8) The applicant shall provide an on-site drainage report.
Fire Prevention/New Construction
1) Fire Depadment modified access and tumareund is approved via
alternative method by Rancho Cucamonga Fire District subject to:
a) Design density of fire sprinkler system must be designed one
level over minimum as per NFDA 13.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-32 - SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT
October 13, 1999
Page 5
b) Provide onsite fire hydrants as per RCFD Standards and special
FDC as per RCFD Standards.
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
1 ) A final acoustical report addressing traffic noise shall be submitted for
City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits. The final report shall discuss methods to reduce the level of
exterior and interior noise to below City standards. The acoustical
engineer shall submit written verification of the adequacy of the
mitigation measures included in the construction building plans.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shal.I certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF October 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
A'FI'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
heraby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuoamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: DR 99-32 - Sunrise Development
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
DR 99-32 - Sunrise Development
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: DR 99-32 Applicant: Sunrise Assisted Llvinq
Initial Study Prepared by:._Rebecca Van Buren,._AICP Date:~tember 21 1999
Noise
Acoustical Report CP/BO B/D prior to D 2, 3
issuance of
permits
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person : Monl~rlng FrequSlCy , ~' ~ Method of Verification SancUons
CDD - Community Development Director ! A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation Of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction ; C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Subinitial (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - PoEice Captain or designee E - Operating i 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
I:%PLANNING\REBECCA%mmp-dr9932.Wpd
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-32
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT: Sunrise Assisted Livin.q
LOCATION: 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLAN NING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planners letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmentYDesign Review approval shall expire if
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and theDevelopment
Code regulations.
Project NO DR 99-32
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon. all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shaft not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of buildin9 permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry wails, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
12. Where reck cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Plannin9 Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
]
Proleer No. DR 99-32
Completion Date
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide.
2.All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
F. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in
accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be
shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within
commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.
4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible
for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted
areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and
debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,
fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant matedal shall
be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
Project NO DR 99-32
Completion Date
9. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / /
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
10. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering / /
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping. is required along Base Line ~
Road.
11. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
12. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / /
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. ~
13. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / /
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / /
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require
separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs.
H. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verify the adequacy ofthe mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures. including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing Satisfactory performance
and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain
consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.
Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be
considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the
applicant shall provide a wdtten monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to
issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of
building permits.
Prolect NO. DR 99-32
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR ~MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following:
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'IT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report,
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are 'required for fencing and/or walls.
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
K. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e. , CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes. ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety
Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition
to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.
Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee,
School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees
receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
Project No. DR 99-32
pompletion Date
4. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public
counter).
L. Grading
1. Grading of the subject proper'b/shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
M. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerline):
60 total feet on Base Line Road
N. Street Improvements
1. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including streettrees, street lights, and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c.Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.
Notes:
( 1 ) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
Proj6ct No. DR 99-32
Completion Date
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Streetorlaneclosure permits are required. Acash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
2. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
O. Public Maintenance Areas
1, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road.
P. Drainage and Flood Control
1. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured
from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
Q. Utilities
1. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
2. Provide separate utility service to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all undergrounded) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
3. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
Project NO DR 99-32
Completion Date
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operatin9 costs for all /
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
2. The separate pamels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one /
parcel prior to issuance of building permits.
3. An easement for a joint use driveway sahll be provided prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: APN 208-432-16. /
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 1500 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) /
(Increase).
~' A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department /
personnel prior to water plan approval.
~' For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test ofthe on-site hydrants shall /
be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after
construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3. Existingfirehydrantlocationsshallbeprovidedpdortowaterplanapproval. Required hydrants,
if any, wilt be determined by the Fire District. Fire Distdct standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final
~nspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15
· / Other: 1997 UBC - Designed one level higher density required as per alternate method
approved by RCFD.
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock. etc. Contact
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations.
6. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
,/ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15.
Prolect No. DR 99-32
Completion Date
,/ California Code Regulations Title 24.
7. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
,,/ All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32.
,/ Other: Approved modified turn-around approved by RCFD.
8. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
,/ Standard Directory in main lobby.
9. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall
be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
10. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
11. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District as follows:
,/ $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).**
**Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
12. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC,
UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION
SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY
CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS.
NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEVV
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE
IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF
COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power.
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with
direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development.
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures.
Project No DR g9-32
Completion Date
U. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. / /
2. One-inchsinglecy~inderdeadboltsshallbeinstalledonallentrancedoors. Ifwindowsarewithin /.___/
40 inches of any ocking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used.
V. Windows
1. A~~s~idingglasswlnd~wssha~ihavesec~ndary~~ckingdevicesandsh~u~dn~tbeab~et~be~ifted / /
from frame or track in any manner.
W. Building Numberi, ng
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / /
visibility.
X. Alarm Systems
1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / /
employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in
turn save dollars and lives.
sc -.r2sl~9 10
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Donald Granger, Planning Technician
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 99 CENTS ONLY
STORES - An appeal of the City Planner's conditions of approval for a 99 Cents
Only Store, a retail store within the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at
9640 Baseline Road, - APN: 202-161-40.
BACKGROUND: The appellant, 99 Cents Only Stores, submitted a Minor Development Review
applicationon June23, 1999, forstorefront modifications. Because ofseveral unresolved design
issues, the applicant requested that the project be scheduled for Design Review Committee review.
On August 17, 1999, the Committee reviewed the proposed storefront modifications and
recommended design changes to be placed as conditions of approval. The applicant subsequently
filed an appeal in a timely manner (see Exhibit "R").
ANALYSIS:
A. General: 99 Cents Only Stores is a general retailer and is proposing to occupy the former
Ralphs/Alpha Beta building, located west of the Rite-Aid store (see Exhibit "A"). The initial
proposed modifications included translucent dark pink awnings, eliminating wainscot on
existing storefront windows, adding storefront windows, changing aluminum mullions color
from bronze to blue, a 6 foot high tri-colored wall sign, and a circular parapet extension. All
the proposed changes and color schemes are inconsistent with the established architectural
style in the center. Staff issued a letter identifying all major design issues that needed to
be resolved prior to recommending approval to the City Planner (see Exhibit "F").
The applicant worked diligently with staff in addressing several design issues such as
eliminating the circular parapet extension and changing storefront colors that would match
the existing theme of the center. No plans for remodeling the remainder of the shopping
center have been submitted, nor has the property owner informed staff of any intent to do
so. Staff encouraged the applicant to address the remaining outstanding design issues,
specifically the awnings, the wainscots for storefront windows, and the size of the sign.
However, the applicant disagreed and stated that the wall sign, the new storefront windows
and the awnings are part of an established corporate identity. As a result of these
unresolved design issues and at his request, staff forwarded the project to the Design
Review Committee for review at the August 17, 1999 meeting. The Committee (McNiel,
Stewart, Fong) recommended that wainscot be applied to the added new storefront
windows (see Exhibit "E"), the proposed wall sign be consistent with the 4-foot sign height,
and the sign colors be reduced from three to two, as allowed by the Uniform Sign Program
forthe center. The Committee did not recommend approval of the awnings. Based on the
recommendations from the Committee, the City Planner issued an approval letter dated
August 24, 1999, with conditions of approval (see Exhibit "C').
ITEM P
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MDR 99-22 - 99 CENTS ONLY STORES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
B. Appellant's Appeal: The applicant is appealing two conditions of approval as follows:
1. The approved Uniform Sign Program for the center shows a specific sign criteria for the
building consisting of a 4-foot sign height and two colors (see Exhibit "H"). The
applicant agreed to the 4-foot sign but contends that the tri-colored, blue, green, and
red wall sign is a trademarked logo (see Exhibit "1") and is necessary for public
recognition. The Planning Commission has reviewed previous similar cases such as
"Funcoland" with regard to their Registered Trademark, on which the City Attorney
advised that, based upon recent court cases, the City retains the power to prohibit the
use of a registered trademark or require it to be reduced in size.
2. At the August 17, 1999, Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant contended
that additional storefront windows were needed for product visibility. A survey of the
in-line retail buildings in the center showed that the storefronts do not have wainscot.
However, the two major anchor buildings (99 Cents Only Store and Rite-Aide) have
wainscot (see Exhibit "G"). After reviewing the existing and proposed storefront
elevations, the Design Review Committee allowed the removal of wainscot for the
storefront windows between the building entdes but required wainscot for the set of
storefront windows adjacent to the building wall (see Exhibit "E"). The Committee
stated that the purpose was to allow additional visibility for the store and to remain in
keepin9 with the major anchor design theme.
C. Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, staff concluded thatthe recommendationsfrom
the Design Review Committee are to maintain consistency with architectural style established
in the center and comply with the approved Uniform Sign Program for the center.
RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsthatthePlanningCommissionupholdtheCityPlanner's
decision and deny the appeal through adoption of the attached Resolution.
City Planner
BB:DG\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Appeal Letter dated September 1, 1999
Exhibit "C" - August 24, 1999 Approval Letter with Conditions for MDR 99-22
Exhibit "D" - August 17, 1999 Design Review Committee Action Comments
Exhibit "E" - Approved Storefront Elevation
Exhibit "F" - July 19, 1999 Staff Letter to Applicant
Exhibit "G" - Existing Storefront elevations
Exhibit "H" - Excerpts of Uniform Sign Program
Exhibit "1" - Proposed Wall Sign
Resolution of Denial
~>' ' PROPOSED ' " "
J 9 CENT ONLY STORES
NO~ A PART
50'
. ~ ,
~_:= .._ ..... · · ~ ~ ._~ ~ _~ tso'
., ,'...,, : .' .; .., .. . ...
,'. ',.' , ..~
CHAUNG CHOI, AIA
& Associcdes 507 North Fuller Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90036
ArchHeels and Planners Tel 1323) 939-6112 Fax (323) 653-9552
September 1, 1999
Brad Buller
City Planner R E C E I V E D
Planning Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Dr~ve SEP 0 ?. lcJ~icJ
Rancho Cucamonga. Ca 91729
Re: Minor Development Review 99-22 City of Rsncho Cucamork':,
99 Cent Only Stores T.L PJanning DiviSion
9640 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga. Ca,
We are accepting all issues except following two issues regard to the DRC, Resolution,
dated on August 24, ]999 for the subject development.
Therefore we are applying for an appeal to the Planning Commission for those two issues
to be reconsidered.
ISSUE ]. The wall sign - colors of "LOGO"
We believe the proposed wall sign should be considered as a registered "LOGO"
and be allowed to maintain irs own colors, as" 97 c" with blue." only"with green,
"stores" with red.
ISSUE 2. Allow all existing and new storefront windows will have no wainscots as proposed.
If you have any questions in the appeal application. please call Choi at {323J 939-6112.
Sincerely.
Cha~g Choi. architect/applicant
cc; Brad Buller. City Planner
Jeff Gold. Vice President, 99 cent Only Stores
T H E O C I T y C) F
IQANCHO CUCANONGA
August 24, 1999
Mr. Chaung Choi, AIA
507 N. Fuller Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90036
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22
Dear Mr. Choi:
The Development Review process for lhe above-described project has been successfully
completed and approval has been granted based upon lhe following findings and conditions.
Thank you for your participalion and cooperation during lhis review process.
Findinqs
1. The proposed 99 Cents Only Store is consistent wilh the General Plan.
2. The proposed 99 Cents Only Slore is in accordance with the objectives of lhe Development
Code and lhe purpose of lhe districl in which lhe site is located.
3. The proposed 99 Cents Only Store, togelher wilh lhe conditions applicable thereto, will nol be
delrimenlal to lhe public health, safety, or welfare or maledally injurious to propedies or
improvements in lhe vicinity.
4. The proposed 99 Cenls Only Store will comply wilh each of lhe applicable provisions of lhe
Development Code.
Conditions
This project is approved subject to the following condilions and the allached Standard Conditions
Planninq (909) 477-2750:
1. Approval is for minor slorefronl modi~calions as shown in lhe allached Exhibil "A."
2. Cad storage shall be located inside the building. Prior Io lhe issuance of building permits, a
Floor Plan shall be submitted 1o Ihe Planning Division showing the carl storage locations inside
the 99 Cents Only Slore.
3. Any changes to lhe approved design must be submitted for approval by lhe Planning Division,
prior 1o the issuance of building permits.
4. The roll-up doors shall be painted to malch the building stucco color.
5. The new aluminum mullions for the windows and sliding doors shall malch Ihe existing color
and be consistent with the cenler.
Cen~er Dr,ve · P.O Box ~07 Rc"-no C:_:ccmongc. CA ~1720 · ,";Co) 477-27C0 · FAX (0G¢) 477-28:0
Mr. Chaung Choi
MDR 99-22
August24,1999
Page 2
6. The wall sign shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and the approved Uniform Sign Program
for the center and require review and approval by the City Planner, prior to installation. The
maximum height o~r the letters and/or numbers shall be 4 feet and shall consist of the following
two colors: red and blue.
7. Roof equipment shall be completely screened using an architecturally compatible material.
Avoid using metal siding as a screening feature.
8. Approval shall 'expire, unless extended by the City Planner, if building permits are not issued
or the approved use has not commenced within 5 years of this date.
9. Any future changes to the existing storefront, elevation modification or installation of cosmetic
architectural features shall require approval by the City Planner.
10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the State Fire
Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code or any other City Ordinances.
Enqineerinq Division {909) 477-2740:
1. A signed consent and waiver form by the property owner to join the appropriate Landscape
and Street Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer, prior to building permit
issuance.
Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of
building permits.
This decision shall be final following a fen-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter.
Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the
appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to conlact Donald Granger at (909) 477-2750.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Rrad Bullet
City Planner
Bt~:DG:mlg
Attachment: Standard Conditions
cc: Karen Mosley, Public Svc. Tech. I
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
REVISED
DESIGN REV[EIN COMMENTS
8:40 p.m, Nancy Fong/Donald Granger August 17, 1999
MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 CHAUNG CHOI - A request to remodel an existing
storefront for a 99 Cent Only Store totaling 23,000 square feet within an existing shopping center
(previously Ralph's Grocery Store) in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located a( 9640 Base
Line Road - APN: 202-161-40.
Backqround: The applicant applied for the subject Minor Development Review to modify the
storefront elevation so that it reflects their corporate identity. Staff issued a complete letter with
recommended design revisions as shown in Exhibit "A." The applicant disagreed with a few of
staff's design comments and requested an appeal as shown in Exhibit "B." An appeal of this
nature requires action by the City Planner with a recommendation from lhe Design Review
Committee.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Commi~ee
discussion,
Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding Ibis
project.
1. The proposed awnings are dark pink in color, translucent (backlit) and contain two corporate
Iogos of 99 cents only store. AIsa, the awnings are projected out and into the required drive
aisle. Since the shopping center does not have awnings in their architectural program,
adding them would be inconsistent with the center. Eliminate the awnings.
2. Provide the same wainscot treatmenl for lhe StOrefront windows consistent with existing
design. Adding mullion patterns at the lop of Ihe slorefront windows would enhance lhe
design of Ihe storefront elevation.
3. Sign. The applicant has not submitted a separate permit for Ihe proposed wall sign. Slaff
commented on the proposed sign in an attempt to assist the applicanl in complying the City's
Sign Ordinance and the approved Uniform Sign Program for the center. The proposed sign
dimensions are 6 feet high by 8 feet 4 inches long. The colors are blue for "99 cents," green
for "only." and red for "stores," The approved Sign Program for lhis cenler shows the sign
dimensions for this major tenant (formerly Alpha-Beta and Ralphs) to be 4 feet high by
almost 30 feet long as shown in Exhibit "C." Staff recommends that the applicant comply with
the dimensions shown and limit the colors to two.
Policy Issues: The following items are a mailer of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into Ihe project design without discussion.
t. A conditional of approval Shall be placed requiring can storage to be inside the building,
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised based upon the above
comments for City Planner review and approval.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present:
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong/Donald Granger
DRC COMMENTS
MDR 99-22 - CHAUNG CHOI
August 17, 1999
Page 2
It also requires that signs be proportionate to and visually balanced with the building
elevation. Proposed 6-foot sign letters are too large and should be reduced to 36-inch
maximum.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised based upon the above
comments and return to Design Review Committee.
Attachment
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larr,/McNiel, Pare Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong/Donald Granger
The Committee requested that the project be revised and recommended approval subject to all
of the following conditions:
1. The translucent awning shall be eliminated.
2. Provide wainscot to the store front windows immediately next to the solid building wall
and as shown in Exhibit "A.'
3. The 99 Cent Only Store wall sign shall have a maximum letter height of 4 feet and shall
consist of the following two colors: red and blue.
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
T H E C I T Y 0 F
ANCHO CUCAHONCA
July 19, 1999
Mr. Chaung Chef, AIA
507 N. Fuller Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90036
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22
Dear Mr. Chef:
Thank you for submitting your proposed project. We want your project to be a success, one which you and
the City can be proud of. We have assigned a project planner, Donald Granger, to assist you throughout
the review process up to final occupancy.
We have reviewed your proposed project, development plans dated June 23 and July 14, for completeness
and accuracy of filing and determined it to be complete for processing. However, attached is a list outlining
the design issues that need to be addressed before staff can recommend approval to the City Planner. To
expedite processing of your project, staff recommends that all issues on the attached list be addressed and
revised plans be submitted for review on or before August 3, 1999.
Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or if we can be of further assistance, please
feel free to contact the project planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7 a.m. to 6 p.rn.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
NF:DG:mlg
Attachment
cc: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
Karen Mosley, Public Svc. Tech. I
99 Cents Only Store
JaCk Lain. AIC8 City IMgna.cjer COunCilmember James V Curala~o
i Cer',rer Drive .- P.O F_.o:,: 307 o F~cncr~o Cuccmcn~3. CA ~[ 729 · Ca, C0) 477-27C0 FAX (¢S30), 77-29,4'P
FILE NO.: MDR 99-22
(COMPLETENESS COMMENTS)
NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete
for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough
analysis during the Development Review Process.
I. Tips for a Successful Process: (Project Planner should insert tips tailored to the specific application)
A. Address Design Issues as early in the process as possible.
B. Identify one person for overall coordination between your professional design team and to serve
as the key contact person with City start.
II. Planninq Division (909) 477-2750:
A. Desiqn Issues - The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be
addressed in the revised plans:
1. Provide screened, long-term cart storage area in arcade using decorative masonry or
other decorative material.
2. Eliminate translucent awnings. Awnings are inconsistent with existing architectural style
of the center.
3. Provide the same wainscot treatment for the storefront windows consistent with the
existing design. Adding mullion patterns at the top of the storefront windows would
enhance the design. Use the same color of aluminum mullions for the storefront windows
and sliding door. A blue color for aluminum window or door mullions is inconsistent with
the existing center.
4. Paint the roll-up doors at the north elevation with the same consistent building stucco color
instead of the proposed 99-cent standard "divine blue.'
5. Any proposed signs must comply with the Sign Ordinance and the approved Uniform Sign
Program for the center. The Sign Ordinance requires that the colors be compatible with
the existing building architecture and states that the use of garish colors are inappropriate.
It also requires that signs be proportionate to and visually balance with the building fascia.
Staff recommends that the proposed signs be a maximum of two colors, in one line and
not exceed a maximum lettedsign height of 3 feet. Signs are subject to separate permit
application and review.
6. The development plans dated July 14. 1999 showed that the roof, building fascia, and
parapet wall over the building entry are proposed to be modified into a raised (in height)
and curved parapet so as to accommodate a 6-fool tall sign. The proposed modifications
are not consistent with the architectural style established in the center because there is
no such architectural element existed,
4'-'0'. [a~
!
; (1) One 1' x 4' Underc~nopy Sig, ' ~*~ ' ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~~
(E) ZD ~ISSIO~ 'l'lLIr 1'0 REtrAIN
f f
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND
UPHOLDING THE CITY PLANNER'S DECISION IN APPROVING MINOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 WITH CONDITIONS FOR A 99 CENTS
ONLY STORE, LOCATED AT 9640 BASE LINE ROAD IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-161-40.
A. Recitals.
1. The appellant. 99 Cents Only Stores, has filed an application for the approval of Minor
Development Review, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Minor Development Review is referred to as "the application."
2. On August 24. 1999, the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the
application with conditions.
3. The decision of the City Planner was appealed in a timely manner by 99 Cents Only
Stores.
4. On the 13th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on the application and concluded said hearin9 on
that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE. it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by the Plannin9
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearin9 on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony. this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 9640 Baseline Road with a street
frontage of approximately 1,030 feet and lot depth of approximately 400 feet and is presently
improved with a shopping center; and
b. The appellant submitted an application for a Minor Development Review on June
23.1999, requesting the following storefront modifications: Translucent dark pink awnings,
elimination of wainscot on existing storefront windows, addition of storefront windows, change of
aluminum mullions from bronze to blue, and a 6-foot high. tri-colored wall sign; and
c. All of the proposed architectural changes described in Section B. paragraph 2,
subsection (b) are inconsistent with the established architectural style of the center since none of
the proposed architectural elements exist and the introduction of same elements would create an
inconsistent architectural style in the center; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
MDR 99-22 - 99 CENTS ONLY STORES
October 13, 1999
Page 2
d. The Uniform Sign Program for the center allows two colors and a letter height of
4 feet; and the proposed "99 Cents Only Store" wall sign has three colors and a letter height of
6 feet. which does not meet the established criteria for the Uniform Sign Program for the center;
and;
e. The General Plan Design Principles states that "Designers should not view their
projects singly, but as part of a larger master plan area in which they are responsible for design
continuity and compatibility";and the proposed design of the "99 Cents Only Store" would be
inconsistent with the established architecture and signage of the center and the introduction of the
proposed architectural features and signage would not be consistent with meeting the General
Plan Design Principles; and
f. Section 17.10.30-F-4 of the Development Code lists criteria for implementing the
goals and policies of the General Plan with regard to shopping centers; and subsection (c) calls
for centers to be designed with one theme, with buildings consistent in design; 99 Cents Only
Store is proposing architectural and signage changes that are unique and inconsistent with the
center and therefore do not meet the specified design guidelines for shopping centers; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed Minor Development Review is not consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code; and
b. The design or improvements of the Minor Development Review is not consistent
with the General Plan and Development Code; and
c. The proposed improvements are not in compliance with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code; and
d. The proposed improvements, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
MDR 99-22 - 99 CENTS ONLY STORES
October 13, 1999
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Pianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: