HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/12/18 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wech~esdays - 7:00 p.m.
December 18, 1996
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilm~mb~rs
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
NI items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the
%week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo
Gutierrez , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Administration of Oath of Office to Jim Frost, City Treasurer, by
Mayor William Alexander.
Presentation of Proclamation to Rancho Cucamonga Pop Warner
Football Panthers recognizing their 1996 Mt. Baldy Conference
Championship.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue
not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are
to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or
member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: October 16, 1996
November 6, 1996
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/27/96 and 12/04/96; and
Payroll ending 11/28/96 for the total amount of $2,535,031.90.
Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of
November 30, 1996.
Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Am/Pm
Mini Market, Prestige Stations Inc., northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Masi Drive.
Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Taco
Factory, Raquel Guillen, 10709 Town Center Drive, Suite 110.
Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Foothill
Market, Anwar and Werken Innabi, 8161 West Foothill Boulevard.
10
15
17
19
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Salsa
Fresh Mexican Grill, Marvin and Brenda Ann Plotkin, 9000 Foothill
Boulevard, Suite 102.
o
Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for China
Star Restaurant, Lee Chung Lam, 9638 Base Line Road.
10.
Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Mobil,
Daniel and Kathy Lee Reshaw, 9315 Base Line Road.
Approval of three month budget (April 1, 1996 - June 30, 199~ for
Recreatjon Activity Center (former Gemco building) in the amount of
$131,230.00 (Fund 134).
11. Approval of City Insurance Indemnification
12.
Approval of the Disposition of City owned property (Jasper Street)
adjacent to Lot 22 of Tract 14072 - Diversified Pacific Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-173
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM
DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO THE
COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR
RECORD
13.
Approval to release Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement for 6239 Archibald Avenue, located on the east side of
Archibald Avenue, north of Lemon Avenue, requested by Lester A.
And Rebecca A. Davies (APN 201-251-21)
RESOLUTION NO. 96-174
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT WITH LESTER A. AND REBECCA
A. DAVIES
14.
Approval to execute contract (CO 96-060) for computer hardware
maintenance with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of
$55,867.00 to be funded from Contract Services Account Number
01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 1996/97.
21
23
25
28
29
32
35
40
41
42
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
15.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Security, ordedng the summary vacation of five feet of excess right-
of-way along Main Street and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. 1 and 2 for Development Review No. 95-21, located on the
south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald
Avenue, submitted by the North Town Housing Development
Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-175
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-21
RESOLUTION NO. 96-176
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
FIVE FEET OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG
MAIN STREET
RESOLUTION NO. 96-177
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-21
16.
Approval of the Map, execution of Improvement Agreement,
Improvement Security, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Ligh~ng Maintenance Distdct
Nos. 1 and 2, and setting the public hearing date for the vacation of
Agate Street and disposition of City owned property by quitclaiming
Lot "C" of Tract 6846, for Tract No. 15730, generally located at the
northwest corner of Beryl and Mignonette Streets, submitted by
DPDC Rancho 45/Ltd., a California Limited Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-178
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15730,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
51
55
59
62
65
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
4
17.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR
TRACT MAP NO. 15730
RESOLUTION NO. 96-180
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE
AGATE STREET AND DISPOSITION OF CITY
OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C"
OF TRACT 6846
Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and
Material Bond (Railroad Crossings) for Parcel Map No. 12959-1
(Capellino Brothers).
Release: Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond
$ 223,095.67
111,547.84
66
69
81
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING AND
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS (Continued from
December 4, 1996)
82
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
5
o
ORDINANCE NO. 567 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE MEMBERSHIP
AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH
SPEED LIMITS OF 55 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM 4TH
STREET TO ARROW ROUTE, 50 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE
FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 55 MPH ON
4TH STREET FROM I-15 TO ETIWANDA AVENUE, 50 MPH ON
4TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO HAVEN AVENUE, 55
MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN
AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE
TO 1-15, AND 50 MPH ON ARROW ROUTE FROM HAVEN
AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT
ORDINANCE NO. 568 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN CITY STREETS
Option II -
Option III -
Option IV -
pg. 84
pg. 85
pg. 86
87
93
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may
open the meeting for public input.
1. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE
ASSIGNMENTS
2. DISCUSSION OF FORMING TASK FORCE TO REVIEW CENTRAL
PARK
3. DISCUSSION OF DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS
4. DISCUSSION OF UTILITY USERS FEE AND PROPOSITION 218
(Oral)
98
106
108
City Council Agenda
December 18, 1996
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue
not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are
to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ROCHESTER, BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; VALLEY BASEBALL
AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING
PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT.
I, Debra J, Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on December 12, 1996, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeling per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
October 16, 1996
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Library Board was held on
Wednesday, October 16, 1996, in the Td Communities Room of the CMc Center, located at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Library Boardmembers: Rebecca Davies, Gina Gregory (arrived at 5:40 p.m.), Laura Muna-
Landa, Ede Swistock, and Chairman Robert Howdyshell.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Deborah Clark, Library
Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was: Councilmember James Curatalo
B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
B1. DISCUSSION OF LONG RANGE VISIONS
Assessing the Needs
(In-house survey, Grapevine survey)
Boardmember Davies presented information on this item. She reported after the Library has been open for two
years, they are now serving between 1,000 an 1,300 individuals each day, have circulated over 600,000 items
last year and know they have registered over 55,000 patrons. She stated they would like to know what their
patrons think of the Library and what new services they might want for the future. She stated through their
Planning Committee, consisting of Boardmembers Davies and Gregory, and Library Manager Deborah Clark,
lhey have designed two surveys to help them measure their progress. She reported the In-House Survey asks
questions of the borrowers about what they like about the library and what they think needs improving. They
have asked what they feel about the facility, what kind of services they received from staff and have asked for
suggestions how to improve services. She stated the second survey is designed to be an insert in the Winter
issue of the Grapevine and would ask similar questions but would direct them to their non-users. She stated
she hoped this survey would help them plan for the future. She stated once the results of both of the surveys
have been compiled, they will be presenting some conclusions to the Library Board in early 1997.
Mayor Alexander felt a question should be asked if the people would be willing to contribute money towards
the operation of the library.
City Council/Library Board Minutes
October 16, 1996
Page 2
Councilmember Williams stated she had learned at a League of California Cities Conference yesterday that
you should gather the informa~on from the survey first and then you can determine whether people are willing
to pay for services. She asked if they had any ideas on geffing people to return the survey.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated it could be faxed or emailed or go through regular mail.
B. Expanding Existing Facility
(Second floor expansion - Literacy Center, Technology Center and Parking Concerns)
Chairman Howdyshell presented the information for this item. He reported that in December, the HUD funded
project to open three quiet study areas for literacy tutodng will be under construction. He stated when
completed, the three study rooms, literacy office and a new larger storage area will help to organize the second
floor into more usable space. This will help to increase shelving in the lower level. He reported parking
conljnues to be an issue because dudng peak hours, no parking is available. He stated the Board will continue
to examine any logical and cost effective solu~ons for parking, but felt that by adding 50 parking spaces or more
would also add 100 more users to an already crowded facility. He asked the Council for their thoughts on the
parking situation.
Councilmember Gutjerrez stated he would like to see parking in the vacant lot until the housing project starts.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there isn't enough time to put in the parking lot before the housing project
starts.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated if here are special programs going on, there is a parking problem.
Councilmember Williams inquired how much parking is done by staff.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated about 18 spaces worth.
Councilmember Williams felt there could possibly be an incentive program to get them to park at Albertsons.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated Bob Dominguez had advised against this.
Mayor Alexander hoped that the Board would keep working on the parking problem.
Chairman Howdyshell added they would lose approximately 44 spaces when they start their construction.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the long-term solution will be a larger facility.
C. Expanding Services
(Technology Center, Young Adult Services Opportunity)
Commissioner Gregory presented information on this item. She stated expanding services also means
expanding technology. She stated everyone is asking how to get "Internet Access" and onto the Information
Highway. She mentioned that in Spring, 1997, staff proposes turning the second floor area currently unused
into a Technology and Discovery Center. She stated to provide the necessary equipment, the Library would
be partnering with APS, the business that currently supplies copy machines and public access computers in
the Library. She reported that ten computer terminals are planned for this fee-based technology center linked
to beth standard and color printers with full Internet access available to the patrons including the capability of
City Council/Library Board Minutes
October 16, 1996
Page 3
e-mail. There will also be many other software programs available. She stated the software and furnishings
of the Center will be determined by the success of their grant application to HUD funding, and of the Spring
fundraiser, the Library Telethon. She mentioned for the library to expand services has meant finding grant
funding to try new things. The Literacy Program continues to be strong in its second year of a f'Ne year grant.
She stated they will be emphasizing on family literacy in 1997 and that this program will be housed next to the
Technology Center which will be a vital part of the staffing and use of the Center. She added that the State
Library is offering a grant opportunity in 1997/98 to create young Adult or Youth At Risk Programs and that the
library is anxious to apply for those funds when the window of opportunity appears. She stated that the newest
legislation to be passed at the federal level for libraries is the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA),
which will allow for competitive grant funding of technology projects across the country beginning in 1997. She
pointed out that Robert Karatsu will be working on this project and most likely attempt to partner with the
schools to create a competiljve proposal for these funds. She asked if the Council had any services they would
like to see the Library offer that are not currently available or in the planning stage.
Mayor Alexander stated he did not have any suggestions, but was wondering how they were going to handle
more people in the library with new programs coming up.
Coundlmember Biane stated he is concerned that the seniors will have access to the library and its services.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated they are looking at considering a satellite collection that would be
rotating materials for the senior center itself so that they can actually go to the senior center instead of not
necessarily having to come to the library. She stated the other thing they are looking at currently to involve
them in a Grandparents with Book Program that the state has just sent an announcement for funds available
for that. She stated the seniors ara very involved with the library's volunteer program and also through Friends
of the Library. She stated they are also looking at rotating their collection of books with other libraries which
would bring more of a selection to the seniors of Rancho Cucamonga.
Coundlmember Gutjerrez felt an outreach program to the high school kids to let them know what is available
is very important also.
Councilmember Williams suggested that the survey also take place at the senior center to get their input.
Chairman Howdyshell suggested that the senior center be able to access the library's collection through the
Internet for easier access for them.
Boardmember Gregory asked if the Council might be able to support additional programs in the future.
Mayor Alexander felt they could.
Chairman Howdyshell felt thera might be the need of coordination when the youth programs project starts up.
Funding Challenges
(Grant Opportunities, Library Referendum, Fundraising: TELETHON, New Services: New
Money?)
Commissioner Swistock presented information on this item. He reported that staff will continue to search out
grant opportunities to increase the services and budget for the library, but that this is only a small part of the
money that is needed. He stated in 1997, the library will be using its final year of bond funds available to
purchase book materials. He stated the bond funds used to make the annual payment to the County of San
City Council/Library Board Minutes
October 16, 1996
Page 4
Bemardino will be exhausted in 1998, but added the contract demands continue to the year 2004. He added
that multiple three year subscriptions of periodicals, an index tools purchased by bond funds in 1994, will expire
in 1997. He stated the three items mentioned above would impact the budget by approximately $300,000 in
1998/99. He also mentioned the Friends of the Library have been an amazing support group, but that even with
their large contributions, they alone cannot close the funding gap. He reported that they hoped the Telethon
fundraiser project would raise from $10,000 to $20,000 its first year. He felt this might be the time to start
planning for the future and asked the Council how they felt about looking for a larger facility.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has not given up the dream of the library at Central Park, and wished they
could start something there. He felt the library would be a big piece of that project.
Councilmember Biane asked what was to be the funding source for the Central Park Library.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated originally that was part of the Redevelopment Plan Project which goes back
to the 1980's. He stated as the increment kept going up that by 1994 they had hoped they could do another
bond issue and be able to have the first phase of Central Park, which included this 130,000 square foot library.
He also stated the thought was to have the operations dollars to maintain a much larger library. He pointed out
that everyone knows what has happened over the last five years since about 1990 with the increment going
beckwards. He now felt the increment growth would be very slow so there is not the same expectations as we
all had in the late 1980°s. He stated for the future they need to think about two things. He stated in order to
fund this that whatever the Agency could contribute would not be enough to do the library and did not know
when it could accomplish some increment of Central Park. He stated they really are looking at alternative
financing whether it be a bond issue or something like that. He added even if you have a large library, how
could the City cover the cost to maintain and operate it.
Councilmember Williams stated even though there is a plan for a 125,000 to 130,000 square foot building at
Central Park, that with technology happening the way it is, she did not feel the word should be put out that this
is the only plan for a library the City can have there. She stated before the project starts, the needs should be
redetermined because of all of the new technology since the 1980's.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he agreed with Councilmember Williams that the project would need to be
redefined.
Mayor Alexander felt the first phase of the Central Park library needs to be looked at. He felt there needs to
be a commitment to do something at the park site. He suggested that the Library Board make a
recommendation to the Council of what the needs are in order to start this and submit it to the Council.
Boardmember Swistock left the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Facilities for the Future
(Central Park, Branch Locations)
Boardmember Muna-Landa presented the information for this item. She felt this is the time to look at the
original Library SeR, ices Master Plan. She added that Central Park had been discussed, and that there is still
a need for an additional branch at the east end or Etiwanda side of the City. She stated the Board realized that
planning, geffing the funding and building all takes time, but that now is the time to begin to tackle the future.
She stated the staff and Board are exploring the possibilities of secured funding to support existing programs
City Council/Library Board Minutes
October 16, 1996
Page 5
and to provide new programs. She mentioned the California Library Association is offering a workshop on
plating a library funding issue on the ballot which would be attended by the Board President and the Director.
She stated they are concerned about Prop 218 and the effects it will have on local government. She stated
they are looking for the Council to help them fund and assist in their programs.
Coundlmember Williams asked if the City has looked at the possibility to use the Mountjoy Bill that passed as
leverage to go to the County to try to renegotiate the commitment to them.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he has approached the County, and stated they are really in the same position
the cities are in with mandates imposed on them.
Councilmember Williams asked if anyone knew how many residents our library serves that are from Fontana,
Montclair, etc. branches.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated part of the agreement with the County was that we allow access to residents
outside of the City into our library.
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated they are approximately 10% of the City's user base, which is very low.
She added they did get $6,000 last quarter because of the services they provide to these people.
Mayor Alexander stated this could also be talked about at the City/County Conference. He suggested that the
Library Board and City Council meet in November after the election to discuss the outcome of Prop 218 and
how it will affect some of the issues brought up tonight.
Coundlmember Gulierrez felt a workshop, which should also include the Library Foundation, would be a great
idea.
B2. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS OF MUTUAL INTEREST
No further items were identified or discussed.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by Library Board:
Approved by City Council:
December 5, 1996
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
November 6, 1996
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Refiular Meetinn
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular mee~ng of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 6, 1996, in the
Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager;
Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Bred Buller, City Planner; Miki Brett, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer;
Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services
Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Deboreh
Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department; and Debre J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, stated he was before the Council to kick off a
community campaign called the "Affinity Credit Card". He stated the City and the San Bernardino County
Central Credit Union (SBCCCU) have entered into a partnership which will issue a credit card to members of
the community. He added that letters have gone out offering the credit card starting next Monday. He stated
they hoped the community would be interested in this offer and use the credit card, and that the proceeds from
it would go to the City Librery which will help fund resources and materials for members of the community. He
stated Gina Eaves, from SBCCCU, and Deborah Clark, Library Manager, were also present and would be
presenting the City Council and City Manager with their own personal credit cards. He continued by stating that
the initial distribution that went out on Monday to the consumers in Rancho Cucamonga was approximately
7,000, and that they hoped to enter into a future campaign with the Board of Directors of the Library and the
Chamber of Commerce to increase the membership of the cards so that there will be more proceeds
generated for the library.
Coundlmember Williams asked what was the breakdown of the numbers and asked what would they get for
doing this.
Gina Eaves, SBCCCU, stated on a credit card issued, there are two sources of income - one of them
is the interest income if there is a balance outstanding from month-to-month, the other source is when
the card is used there is an income that flows through the merchant who is taking that card for the
purchase and that is called interchange income. She stated that is where they are doing the revenue
sharing. She stated they would be revenue shadng with the City through a year-to-year agreement that
was entered into with the City in April. She added as the card is used the City will get a portion of that
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 2
revenue and the Credit Union will get a portion of it. She stated they had estimated the potential to probably
be around $6,000 in the first calendar year which will go to the City to go towards its Library. She stated in
addition to this, they are also inviting the community of Rancho Cucamonga to have the card by paying the City
$1.00 for every card application that comes through the Credit Union.
ITEM 13 WAS DISCUSSED AT THIS TIME, BUT THE MINUTES WILL REMAIN IN AGENDA ORDER.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1.
Gary Kendrick congratulated the winners of the City Council election and congratulated Debra Adams
and Jim Frost on their re-election. He also thanked Debra Adams for her assistance through the
campaign process. He stated he felt the utility tax should go on the ballot by either flat removal of it
or a guaranteed phased out plan. He stated he realizes what Prop 218 will do for the City now that it
is approved by a mandate of the voters. He felt the City Council should "leash in" the Fire Department
a little bit because they reflect this City. He asked for Councilmembers Gutierrez and Biane to bdng
the utility tax issue up at the next meeting so it can voted on by the Council to either phase it out in three
to five years or a flat removal of it.
C2.
Marlin Forden stated his son's vehicle had been towed and stored, but that he did not agree with this
action. He commented on his conversation with the officer involved. He did not think the deputy's
evidence was conclusive and felt the deputy should have evidence to prove the vehicle had not been
moved in 72 hours. He continued to read a statement into the record from his son which is on file in
the City Clerk's office.
Coundlmember Gutierrez reported he is presently working with Captain Bieberdorf on these types of issues.
C3.
Doug Morris, representing District 21 Little League, stated that on behalf of the Sports Advisory
Committee and youth sports in general, he wanted everyone to work together on the light situation
which he realizes has been a very hot issue for some time now. He stated in yesterday's paper he had
read that the fees were $4.27 and stated they are substantially more than this. He continued to give
more detailed information on the field costs. He stated through the Sports Advisory Committee, and
also Pdmo Morales, they are working for youth sports in general and that they want to work with the
Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council and the community. He stated there are not
enough facilities available to have all of the sports without some kind of lighting. He mentioned that
he and Primo Morales want to work with everyone. He asked if they could be contacted to try to get
this issue worked out to help the youth of the City.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/16/96 and Payroll ending 10/17/96 for the total amount of
$1,298,741.33.
D2. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Willie & Pie Pizza Padour, W and P
Pizza Parlor-A California Limited Partnership, 632 Haven Avenue, Suite 1.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 3
D3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Arrow Route Street
Improvements from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Spur to 400 feet west of Milliken Avenue, to be
funded from Transportation Systems Development, Account 22-4637-9522 and SB140 Account No. 35-4637-
9522.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE BURLINGTON
NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD SPUR TO 400 FEET WEST OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval to reject all bids for the Sports Park Pavilion Improvement Project as non-responsive to the
needs of the City,
D5. Approval of extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
D6. Approval of an order to vacate Almond Avenue and Cherry Avenue south of Wilson Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF ALMOND AVENUE
AND CHERRY AVENUE SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE
D7. Approval to execute a Drainage Acceptance Agreement for Etiwanda Intermediate School, located at
the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street, submitted by Etiwanda School District.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE
AGREEMENT FOR ETIWANDA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
OF RANCHO
ACCEPTANCE
D8. Approval to execute agreement (CO 96-053) with Mayer, Coble and Palmer for City Proseculjon
Services for Code Enforcement.
D9. Approval to execute amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract (CO 94-017) for Fiscal Year
1996/97.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 4
D10. Approval and execution of the amendment to Agreement (CO 94-077) District Agreement No. 8-924,
A/l, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the Design and Construction of
Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting on State Route 30 (19th Street) at Hermosa Avenue for an increase in
matching funds due to revised cost estimates.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF
THE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-924, A/l,
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING ON ROUTE 30 (19TH STREET) AT HERMOSA AVENUE FOR AN
INCREASE IN MATCHING FUNDS DUE TO REVISED CONSTRUCTION,
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING COST
ESTIMATES.
D11. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and Ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for
Tract No. 15725, generally located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway west of Belpine Place, submitted
by Lewis Development Company, a California General Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15725,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 96-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15725
D12. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Cash Deposit
in lieu of a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for CUP 95-15, located on the north side of
Arrow, east of Rochester Avenue.
Release: Faithful Performance Multiple
Maturity Certificate of Deposit
$ 98,000.00
Accept: Cash Deposit, Receipt #01-44761 9,800.00
Received 10-10-96
RESOLUTION NO. 96-147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 95-15,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT, BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST
AVENUES, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 5
D13. Approval to release Maintenance Bonds for Terra Vista Parkway, Tract 13303.
Release: Maintenance Bond $ 11,600.00
D14. Approval to release Maintenance Bond for Tract 13890-2, located on the north side of Highland
Avenue, south of Banyan Street and west of Deer Creek Canyon.
Release: Maintenance Bond $ 17,800.00
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar, with Councilmember Biane abstaining on Item D2. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE RECOVERY OF COSTS FOR SECOND POLICE
RESPONSES TO PARTIES
James Markman, City Attorney, stated that he suggests to the Council that they might want to hold off on
second reading of this Ordinance, if not abandoning it, because of the people's enactment of Prop 218 last
evening. He stated this is not to say this is not a good idea, that this particular approach might prove to be
correct or them may be other ways to approach this. He stated the way it is drafted now it would fall under Prop
218 because it is a property related police service which would be payable back to the City for the police
response. He stated this could be considered a fee that is charged for delivering the police service to the
community. He stated Prop 218 has one provision which precludes the City from charging, enacting or
collecting a fee for general police or fire service which is property related and available to the community. He
felt this was a close enough call so that at this point in time, and in order for the Council to comply with Prop
218 without argument, that they hold up on second reading of the Ordinance until it is brought back to the
Council.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he really wanted this to pass, but did appreciate the conservative approach.
He felt it would be better to go ahead and try it until legal counsel knew for sure what effects Prop 218 would
have on this. He asked how long it would take before more information was available.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated he and the City Manager would be aftending a League of California
Cities workshop on November 20 and would hopefully have more answers then.
Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he did not mind waiting two weeks to vote on this, but if at that time all of the
questions are not answered, he still felt he would want to go ahead and vote for the Ordinance to be approved
in order to improve the community and levels of public safety.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he did not see any problems with tabling this for two weeks until more
information is gathered.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed.
Matt Dedynski, stated he initiated this Ordinance, and felt the Council should go ahead and vote on the
second reading and if there is cause to do otherwise, to deal with it then. He did not think this should
be dropped.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 6
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if they found out this was illegal, couldn't it be rescinded.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated there are two issues, one is if this is even valid at all because it relates
to a police service. He stated the second issue is if it is valid, it is still enacting a new fee that is property related
and the second phase of this would be to submit it to a vote.
Mayor Alexander suggested they go ahead and approve the Ordinance tonight, which would go in effect in 30
days. He stated this would not hold things up if it does prove to be legal, but that if it is not legal they could go
ahead and refund any fees collected.
Councilmember Williams stated she is uncomfortable voting on it now and felt they should find out about it
before it is voted on. She stated she is in favor of the Ordinance, but did not want to go ahead until this could
be done dght.
Councilmember Biane stated he felt Councilmember Williams brought up a good point and felt the voters have
spoken about Prop 218. He felt they should hold up on this until more information is available.
Mr. Dedynski felt they should go ahead with the vote now.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he did not think two more weeks would matter and asked if Mr. Dedynski would
agree to that.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked for it to come back in two weeks.
Mayor Alexander stated he didn't see why it couldn't be acted on tonight.
Councilmember Williams stated Prop 218 is a voter mandate and did not think they should vote on this tonight.
Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see Council direction for the police department to provide multiple
responses, at least up to three times, to assist in discouraging these types of loud parties, even if there is not
a fee to be charged right now.
ORDINANCE NO. 561 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.32 TO TITLE 9 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE RECOVERY OF
COSTS FOR SECOND RESPONSES BY POLICE TO PARTIES AND OTHER
ASSEMBLAGES
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to bring this back at the November 20 meeting. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ('EIR) FOR INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-05 - MISSION LAND/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A public headrig
on the Final EIR for a request to add Big Box retail as a Conditionally Permitted Use on approximately 33 acres,
including mitigation measures, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring plan, plus
a request by the City for consideration of an additional contiguous 40 acres, for a total consideration of
approximately 73 acres within the Industrial Park designation (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 7
generally located north of Fourth Street, east of Milliken Avenue, and west of the I-15 Freeway - APN: 229-263-
18 through 21,229-263-48 through 53; and 229-341-13. Staff report presented by Miki Bratt, Associate
Planner.
Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that Resolution No. 96-149 as listed on the agenda is an error and should
be an Ordinance (Ordinance No. 563).
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
John Richard and Jim Maxtel, Mission Land Company, stated they would be happy to answer any
questions the Council might have.
Councilmember Biane asked if they have any retailers they can announce.
Jim Maxtel stated they cannot announce anything, but are working on a couple of things at the present
time.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-148
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 12, ADDING
WAREHOUSE-STYLE MERCHANDISING AS A USE AND THE ASSOCIATED
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 96-148. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN 95-05 - MISSION
LAND/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Big Box retail as a Conditionally Permitted Use
on approximately 33 acres, plus a request by the City for consideration of an additional contiguous 40 acres,
for a total consideration of approximately 73 acres within the Industrial Park designation (Subarea 12) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, generally located north of Fourth Street, east of Milliken Avenue, and west of the
I-15 Freeway- APN: 229-263-18 through 21,229-263-48 through 53, and 229-341-13.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 563.
ORDINANCE NO. 563 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 95-05 AMENDING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT TO
ADD WAREHOUSE-STYLE RETAIL MERCHANDISING AS A USE FOR 73 ACRES
OF LAND, LOCATED NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, EAST OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY IN SUBAREA 12 - APN: 229-263-18
THROUGH 21,229-263-48 THROUGH 53, AND 229-341-13
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading for November
20, 1996. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 8
F2. CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88-02 (CO 88-199) - STANDARD
PACIFIC - A requestto amend the termination date of the Agreement for Etiwanda Highlands (Tentative Tract
13564 and Tract 13565) for approximately 282 acres located at the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and
Wardman Bullock Road. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Mike White, Standard Pacific in Costa Mesa, asked for the Council to approve this.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 562.
ORDINANCE NO. 562 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AN EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 88-02 FOR ETIWANDA HIGHLANDS
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading for November
20, 1996. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items were submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROPRIATE $10,000 ($3,905 FROM FUND 20 AND $6,095 NET
PROCEEDS FROM THE SKATE PARK FUNDRAISER), AND APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO 96-055) WITH PURKISS-ROSE-RSI FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE
SKATE PARK PROJECT Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. There being no response, public comments were
closed.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. REPORT ON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST
AVENUE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who stated a resident in Etiwanda had brought
this up at the last meeting about the traffic conditions at Base Line and East Avenue. He felt this was prompted
by the closure of Etiwanda Avenue due to the infrastructure going in at the intersection; therefore a lot of traffic
was diverted onto East Avenue and Base Line. He stated the infrastructure work is now complete and the traffic
can now be spread out on East and Etiwanda. He stated Caltrans will be staffing a project very soon to do a
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 9
seismic retrofit on the bridge structure at East and Base Line. He stated construction will start about mid-
December. He stated it will take approximately 100 working days with the completion to be near the end of April
or beginning of May. Caltrans has told the City they will install a four-way stop at Base Line and East with safety
features. He stated the City does have plans ready to go for a signal at this intersection, with Caltrans approval
and a permit issued. He felt it would be a good idea to go ahead and start the installation of the signal now as
Caltrans is doing the seismic retrofit project. He stated staff could bring this project back to the Council for
approval and to move forward with the advertising for the installation of the signal.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated there is a lot of concern by the residents in Etiwanda.
The Council felt staff should go forward with this and would like a report to come back to them when the
information is available.
ACTION: Report received and filed and staff to move forward with this project.
12. REPORT ON ANIMAL SHELTER OPERATIONS Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant
to the City Manager.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
13. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM VIP CLUB PRESIDENT DON CARROLL ON MATTERS
RELATED TO THE SENIOR CENTER
Don Carroll, President, VIP Club, stated the seniors were present to thank the Council for the Senior
Center that was dedicated in June, 1996. He stated they are looking forward to the improvements that
are still going to be done, but wanted to make sure the Council was aware of the problems that exist
at the Senior Center. He stated they need more handicap parking spaces. He also reported that on
occasion, the seniors have been accosted by some of the youth who are telling them to "drop dead"
and things of that nature. He also reported of an instance that occurred between he and a parent of
one of the kids and how the parent did not think the seniors should be there at all, but to the people
in the City who pay taxes. Mr. Carroll asked for the scheduling to be changed so that they do not have
things going on at the same time that the youth do. He asked for there to be an hour separation
between events so there is more time to set up for something. He mentioned that the seniors want to
keep from having confrontation with the youth and their parents.
Mayor Alexander stated he did not think these situations reflect the attitude of the whole community.
Councilmember Biane stated he felt the Council would agree that the seniors were an asset to the community.
He stated Suzanne Ota is working on these problems and did not feel it would happen again.
Mr. Carroll thanked the City staff for all of the help.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked when will the seniors see all youth out of the Senior Center.
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, stated next year the whole transition would be complete. She
stated she has worked with Joe O'Neil on the three additional handicap parking spaces.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the parking lot would be taken care of through CDBG money and that they
would be using the space directly to the east of the center for other parking.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 10
Coundlmember Williams asked if there had been any discussion with an adjoining property owner for overflow
events for an interim use.
Suzanne Ota, Community SeNices Manager, stated that is correct and that they have been in contact with the
Assistance League and are trying to work something out with them.
Councilmember Biane thanked the seniors for coming out tonight and for voicing their concerns.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Mayor Alexander asked that the Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee talk about the lighting
issue previously brought up by Doug Morris.
J2. Councilmember VVilliams asked for the Senior Center issue previously discussed to also go back to
the Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. Prena Napodia commented on the traffic on Highland at Rockrose and Etiwanda and felt the speed
limit should be reduced.
Mayor Alexander referred her to Joe O'Neil to discuss this matter.
K. Tony Espinosa commented on how he keeps his trailer in a storage park, but that when he brings it
home and leaves it on the street and has to go to the market or whatever to get ready for his trip, he
keeps getting ticketed.
Mayor Alexander asked him how long it was left on the street.
Mr. Espinosa stated one day. He added he has started writing a note and leaving it on his RV so the
police will not give him a ticket when he is going to the store.
Mayor Alexander stated he felt it was 72 hours that they had.
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated they are not allowed to leave a trailer between the hours
of 2:00 and 6:00 a.m., but that there is an appeal procedure for people who like Mr. Espinosa receive a citation
and explain their case. He stated he routinely dismisses these types of citations.
Mayor Alexander asked for this to be discussed at the next meeting.
Councilmember Williams felt possibly this Ordinance needed to be reviewed again.
Councilmember Guljerrez felt maybe the Ordinance needs to be more specific for the police to have more clear
guidelines for enforcing this.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1996
Page 11
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting
adjourned at 8:32 p.m. not to reconvene. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there would be no Executive Session
as was listed on the agenda.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
%
·
eJ,vl
~J
I--~
i;
I
N NNO ~
·
~omoooto~o~ooeotlot~oooooo~o~o~
A A A
A A A
r it ViV'
Itl I I I '1t It It It el 11 lilt el
~ N
m ~0
V~
VI
V~
MJ
U
)
~v
Z~J
U,~.~
C2h'
V
V
V
V)
· ~
ZZ~Z~ZZ
~Z~Z
U~ZZ
J
Z
I--
C3
Z
,.v
W ~..
~1
Z
4 ZZ
,J
U
~' ,la,
kel-
Z Z I-OU I-.4 H
u, luJ
Q Z z,- ,10 WOJ eZ:} ZN~NV~I-.
Z u,I ul :Dk, ~eUaV) Hd,~H Z,f H
I-- J Z,~ Z4uJe-e4J))Nw e'.~eZ(~
~'04ZG, OOI--I[IZ*r4,,,I]t,IU)!,
~"'~Clhe,,J F-,~OVII--'I(H),U,O~,tZ'.rW OZ:I,IM.
Wkn%H e' .,r4Ww WUe, J,,'U,I,-H I N
rZ~QO(JUUiU_ijjjI:I
Z
p-
·
UZI~·
(,)
Ztl,~
I-,
I i A A A
~1 ~ A A
!'i
ii
V H V~ ~ V ~
V J V~ V ~
V ~ Vl 0 V ~
I01
· ·
I
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
I I
· ·
I I wZZ
· · ~ ~Z
Izl uuuuu
I I
m~$
· ·
""
I-- U E:[
I-- ,J · e/.,j
H uJ Z U.i~J t,~W Jl--l.) r,,4H
,,v ='~1-- t-, l.)l.,- a. ua
W k4 4 k,"~,,I
W
~ ~U I W
UZ JZ ~
· ·
I ·
· ·
I I
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
tl[m
I I
· ·
,J
),
~ LL
I I
· ·
· ·
·
· I'
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
· ·
! !
· ·
I
· ·
· e l~
· ·
I l
I
I
I
: I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I~1
I~1
I~1
I J
I~1
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
8 I
I
I I
eeeeeeesee
Z
Z
·
I-
t-
Ze~r~
,/
I,-
kl
"1"1
~0~0000~000~0~00~000~000~000~00~00~0~0~0000
~N~O~O~O00~O~O0~O~O~O~O~O00~O0~O~O~O~O000
~ ~ - .
I' ~
l~l ~ O Z
0 W
IUI O ) ZZZ
w O W N
0w222~ 2o~zzowmzuooo~o ooooo~ N~Z~ZZem¢¢
ZW~ZZW~LKWWW~UW(JZZWNZWWZWZZW~W2mW~¢~¢¢~
I I
1(:21
·
j
e
·
°~ ~ ~
w Z
olegl
NI41
"'1':
V
v
~ I~1~ ~ (W~H ~
"' I~: """" "' '~" ' '""
Zw(wg~O4g~
!|
· I
· ·
I:
·
· I
· I C~ ·
I I ~' °
,v
· I ,YH4[U.;~-
· · ~' "YO),s,,),(I-'v Z
I JJOOC) C)C2C200~
I
· I
~0OOZZZZO~w
J
Z
0
Z
Z
N~ONN
Z 1~ Z ·
),,4 I-IV)
IZ) · I,,,,
u Z tIC)
).-4 H g I&JO
ZNZJI,,-~J,
v'~,ogagelelujC~ GgC) V'~U,I
0
i-.Oc
.J
;i
-.1=1
~ ~ ~ · ~ .....
ill
00(2'
Iwl
i)-I'
gl
i'i
·
· ·
I
· ·
· i
I
I I
· ·
·
· I
· ·
· ·
ewe
I I
Itul
· I
· |
0
N
f4
0
|i
0
0 0
N N
Iwl
I;
· ·
· ·
I ~
I I
,'
·
·
· ·
i ·
·
· I
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· I
·
· I
· ·
eu~l
I~1
I I
i.~,1
~ ~ ~ ~ ·
W J ~ ~ ~ l
~Z ~(~OO~Zw(ZO ~oN2~Z O0 w~wOOZ)00~OoO 2 ~OZo~ wOO~
~¢::).,,..
),. ,..,
I-
~.¢
¢,,,)
"1';
tuO000000000
· ·
·
· ·
I~JI
I""1
· ·
I~1
I"'1
I~.¢1
· ·
I I
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I I
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
· I
1311
I I
I¢:~1
IZl
lull
· ·
J
¢
I-,
I-
,
I.
12/11/1~
CITY OF RANClIO CUCANONGA
PORTFOLIO MASTER SUNMARY
NOVEMBER 30, 1996
CITY
AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY---
PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365
INVEST~S BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERM MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT
Certificates of Deposit - Bank ...............
Local lqency Investment Funds ................$
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............$
treasury Securities - Coupon .................
Wortgaqe Backed Securities ...................$
11,825,532.50 19.59 547 184 6.100 6.185
11,129,630.31 18.44 1 1 5.524 5.601
36,387,656.25 60.29 1,605 1,260 6.537 6.628
272,845.00 0.45 1,180 273 6.057 6.141
740,969.74 1.23 8,295 4,578 7.817 7.926
I~AL INV~?ERTS and AVERAGES ............. $ 60,356,633.80 100.00% 1,182 853 6.278% 6.366%
Passix>ok/Checking Accounts ...................$ 708,261.65 1.973 2.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 7,233.90
TOTAL CJISH and PURCHASE INTEREST .............$ 715,495.55
TOTAL ~ and INVF.~ ................. $ 61,072,1~.35
NONTH ENDING FISCAL
TOT~ { NOVEMBER 30 YEAR TO DATE
Current Year $ 311,904.80 $ 1,666,007.81
AVERAGE DALLY BALANCE $ 60,946,498.33 $ 62,841,180.07
EFFECTIVE RATE OF RETURN 6.23% 6.32%
)ATE
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and
is in comformity with the investment policy adopted August 7, 1996. A copy of
the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department.
The Investment Program hereinshown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to
meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Source of Valuation -
Interactive Data Corporation automatic pricing service.
12/11/1996
CITY OF RAWCBO CUCAMONGA
Ilrv'ESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 1996
CITY
CASH
AVERAGE PURCq{ASE
BALANCE DATE BOOK VA/~UE
STATED ---YTM--- MATURITY DAYS
FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RAn 360 365 DATE TO MAT
CERTIFICATES OF DEll)SIT -BANK
00937 FOOTI{ILL INDEPBANK 04/06/95
00965 GI{EAT WEST{ BANK 01/25/96
00966 GREAT WESTERNBANK 03/04/96
o~77 GHAT WESTERN SaNK {)9/17/96
00924 SA~WA 12/28/94
00933 SANWA 02/23/95
o0945 SA!~A 05/O2/95
00975 SA~A 05/22/96
O0976 SA~WA 08/O6/96
00980 SANWA 11/26/96
SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 11,825,532.50
LOCAL AGENa INVESTMENT FUND~
0~05 LOCAL ACarY INVST FUND
00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
SUlfi~)TALS and Afi~.P, AGES 12,616,296.98
FEDER. AL AGENCY ISSUES - COOPOe{
00964 FEDERAL FARM (~HH)IT BA!{ 01/16/96
00969 F~I)ERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/05/96
00973 FEDERAL FANN (IREBIT B~xNK 05/20/96
00978 FEDERAL FARH CREDIT BANK 10/03/96
00922 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA~ 12/19/94
00939 FEDERAL HOEdE LOAN BANK 04/06/95
00940 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/06/95
00962 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/18/95
00971 FEDERAL HOMELOANBANK 03/19/96
00974 FEDERAL HOSE LOAN BANK 05/21/96
00938 FEDERAL ]KNE LOAN NORTG. CO 04/06/95
00957 FEDERAL HOME LOAN NORTG. CO 11/20/95
00~7 FEDERAL HO~E LOAN NORTO. CO 03/O6/96
00968 FEDERAL HOME LOAN NORTG. CO 02/22/96
OO972 FEDERAL HONE LOAN NORTG. CO 05/15/96
00926 FEDERAL MATL WIG ASSI{ i2/29/94
00947 FEDERAL MATL MTG ASSN 05/08/95
00959 FEDERAL NATL NTG ASSN 11/29/95
00960 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/24/95
00981 FEDERAL NATL MTGASSN 11/29/96
SUBTOTALS aid AVERAGES 34,520,989.58
2,000,000.00
500,000.00
500,000.00
1,810,532.50
1,000,000.00
500,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,515,000.00
11,825,532.50
9,952,818.44
1,176,811.87
11,129,630.31
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
965,156.25
942,968.75
4,000,000.00
995,312.50
1,000,000.05
1,002,031.25
2,500,000.00
1,998,750.00
1,985,312.50
3,000,000.00
1,998,125.00
1,500,000.00
4,000,000.05
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
36,387,656.25
2,00,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.950 6.950 7.047 04/{)9/97 129
500,000.00 500,000.00 5.050 5.050 5.120 01/29/97 59
500,000.00 500,000.00 4.700 4.700 4.765 03/04/97 93
1,810,532.50 1,810,532.50 5.300 5.300 5.374 03/18/97 107
1,0{30,000.00 1,000,000.00 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 26
500,005.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 85
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.410 6.410 6,499 05/02/97 152
1,5(N),O00.O0 1,500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 05/26/98 541
1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.650 5.650 5.728 08/06/97 248
500,000.00 500,000.00 5.350 5.350 5.424 05/27/97 177
11,825,532.50
11,825,532.50 6.100 6.185 184
9,952,818.44 9,952,818.44 5.601 5.524 5.601 1
1,176,811.87 1,176,811.87 5.601 5.524 5.601 1
11,129,630.31
11,129,630.31 5.524 5.601 1
2,000,000.00 1,988,125.00 6.030 6.030 6.114 01/16/01 1,507
2,0(0,000.00 1,993,125.{)0 6.165 6.165 6.251 03/05/01 1,555
1,050,000.00 1,012,500.00 6.500 6.500 6.590 05/20/99 900
1,500,000.00 1,513,593.75 6.610 6.610 6.702 10/06/99 1,039
1,000,000.00 1,024,687.50 8.030 8.030 8.142 12/19/97 383
1,000,000.00 999,3T3.00 4.570 6.638 6.730 12/30/96 29
1,000,000.00 991,562.50 5.240 7.030 7.127 11/30/98 729
4,000,000.00 3,977,500.00 6.195 6.195 6.281 12/18/00 1,478
1,000,000.00 1,002,500.00 5.880 6.053 6.137 03/19/99 838
1,000,000.00 1,020,937.50 7.025 7.025 7.123 05/21/01 1,632
1,000,000.00 1,010,312.50 7.420 7.226 7.326 09/23/99 1,026
2,500,000.05 2,496,093.75 6.290 6.290 6.377 11/17/00 1,447
2,000,000.00 1,989,375.00 5.990 6.055 6.088 03/06/01 1,556
2,000,000.00 1,972,500.00 5.695 5.867 5.948 02/16/01 1,538
3,000,000.00 3,020,625.00 7.275 7.275 7.376 05/15/01 1,626
2,000,000.00 2,001,250.00 7.700 7.752 7.859 12/10/96 9
1,500,000.00 1,534,218.75 7.270 7.270 7.371 05/08/00 1,254
4,000,000.00 4,003,750.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 11/28/05 1,458
1,000,000.00 1,000,625.00 5.970 5.970 6.053 11/25/98 724
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 11/29/01 1,824
36,552,656.25
36,500,000.00 6.537 6.628 1,260
12/n/19~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIGA
INVESTMIUfr PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS
NOVENBI~ 30, 1996
CITY
AVEPAGE !~E
BALA~E DATE BU(g VALUE
STATED ---TIN--- MATURITY DAYS
FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT
TREASURY SECURITIES -
00903 TREASURY MOTE
AVERAGES
06/08/94 272,845.00
272,845.00
I)RTGAGE BA(ZED S~C~ITIES
00071 FEDERAL fE LOAN MORTG. CO 02/23/87
0O203 FEDERAL MATL 14TG ASSN 09/21/87
00002 GOVEtUDIENT NATIONAL 140PLY; A 06/23/86
00069 GOVE]U{MENT MATTONAL ]DRTG A 05/23/86
00004 SMALl, BUSINESS ADMIN 07/25/86
SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES
277,000.00 277,432.81 5.625 6.057 6.141 08/31/97 273
45,774.97 46,994.74 39,436.99 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 1,857
98,978.15 107,148.20 108,608.74 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,022
78,183.80 79,273.82 67,582.92 8.500 8.621 8.740 05/15/01 1,626
23,329.21 22,871.78 3,223.84 9.000 8.534 8.652 03/15/01 1,565
494,703.61 449,092.64 493,697.21 8.750 7.261 7.361 07/25/11 5,349
742,772.62 740,969.74 712,549.70
705,381.18 7.817 7.926 4,578
TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVG.
$ 60,356,633.80 60,497,801.57
59,978,436.68 60,437,543.99 6.278% 6.366% 853
12/11/19~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INVESTMENT PORTH)LIO DETAILS - CASH
NOVEMBER 30, 1996
CI1n/
CAS!t
AVERAGE PURCHASE
~IA!iCE DATE BOOK VALUE
STATED ---]ff!4- NATURITY DAYS
FACE VALUE NARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO NAT
aIRKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
00979 RANK OF ARERICA
SUBTOTALS and AVERAGE
650,892.61
57,369.04
968,061.65 708,261.65
2.000 1.973 2.000
2.000 1.973 2.000
1.973 2.000
Accrued Interest at Purchase
7,233.90
$ 715,495.55
12/11/1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PM - 5
PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY
NOVENBER 1, 1996 ' MOVE)fliER 30, 1996 CASI{
STATED TRANSACTION PUIU2RASES SAL~F~/MATURITIES
TYPE INVES~EIFI # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ' BANK BEGI~I~BALANCE:
00958 SANWA 5.600 11/26/1996 500,000.00
00980 SANWA 5.350 11/26/1996 500,00<).00
SUBT(YrALS ~d ENI)INGB~I~Q~2E 500,000.00
11,825,532.50
500,000.00 11,825,532.50
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS (Monthly Summary)
(KK)05 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND
00804 LOCAL AGENCY I~ST FUND
SUBTOTAI.S and ENDING BALANCE
5.601 800,000.00
5.601
BEGINNING BALANCE:
2,300,000.00
12,629,630.31
800,000.00 2,300,000.00 11,129,630.31
CHECKING/SAVINGSACCOUNTS (Monthly Summary)
00180 BANK OFAMERICA
00979 BANKOF{CA
SUlYlX)TAL.~ and ENDING BALANCE
2.000 4,567,000.00
2.000
BEGINNING BALANCE:
4,930,000.00
1,071,261.65
4,567,000.00 4,930,000.00 708,261.65
FEDERAL AGEI~FISSUES -COUPON
00981 F~ENALB~MTGASSN
B~INNI[ {:
6.230 11/29/1996 2,0(N),000.00
34,387,656.25
36,387,656.25
TREASURY SECUI~ITIES - COUPON
BEGINNING BALANCE:
272,845.00
272,845.00
140I~IT~AGE ~CKE) SECURITIES
00071 FEI)ERAL HONE LO~ MORTG. CORP. 8.000
00203 FDERAL ~TL NTG ASSN 8.500
00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONM~ MORTG ASSN 8.500
GO069 CO{ I{ATIONAI, ~RTG ASSN 9.0GO
BEGINNING BALAN<;E:
11/15/96 1,167.49
11/25/96 531.15
11/20/96 1,266.84
11/20/96 48.63
743,983.85
S~TOTAJ~S and ENDING BALANCE
0.00 3,014.11 740,969.74
BEGINNING BM.~AI~E:$ 60,930,909.56 7,867,000.00 7,733,014.11 61,064,895.45
APPLICATION
'TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
DISTRICI' SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor' s names/license:
License TYpe
1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND
FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
DROPPING
YES ....
LICENSE(S)
File Number .............. 323636
Receipt Number ......... 1104857
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date.. . 9/9/96
Issued Date
RIVERSIDE
AM/PM MINI MARKET
NEC FOOTHILL BLVD & MASI DR
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91729
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
4 CENTERPOINTE DR
LA PALMA CA 90623
PRESTIGE STATIONS INC 270445
Transaction ~?VDe Fee TYPe ]~_S3Le_E DUD Date
PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA NA YES 0 SEP 09,1996
PARTNER
Fee
$100.00 :
$100.00
TOTAL
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pari~of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of RIVERSIDE
Date SEP 09,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true' (3) that no oersnn other ,h~. t,,. a-pl ca .... app cants has az y direct or inchreel interest in
the applicant or applican."s business t~ he couductcel under the license(s) tot which this &pplication is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the
be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may
Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s)
PRESTIGE STATIONS INC (P-12)
Attached: 231 &SIG 211
RECEIVED
ABC 211 (5/96)
OCT 0 2 1996
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning DivisiOn
c ~ t t t o x N t A DROPPING
-~ YES
APPL I CATI ON FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE L I CENSE(S)
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 7824400
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Narne of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
File Number .............. 325208
Receipt Number ......... 1112361
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 10-24-96
Issued Date
RIVERSIDE
TACO FACTORY
10709 TOWN CENTER DR STE I10
RANCHO ~ CUCAMONGA CA 91730
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
2940 MALAGA CIR
DIAMOND BAR CA 91765
RECEIVED
NOV 0 4 1996
City ot Rancho Cucamonga
planning Division
License TvDe Transaction Type Fee TYPe Master DUD Date Fee
1.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 OCT 24,1996 $300.00:
2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 OCT 24,1996 $205.0D:
TOTAL $505.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OFCALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date OCT 24,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are hue; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed mmsfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement ente~d into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or wansfe~or or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the u'ansfer application may
be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department.
Applicant Name(s)
GUILLEN RAQUEL
ABC 211 (5/96)
17
CALIIORNIA
APPL I CATI ON FOR
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3?3? Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782--4400
DROPPING
YES
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
File Number .............. 324222
Receipt Number ......... 1107737
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 9-25-96
Issued Date
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If premise licensed:
Type of license
RIVERSIDE
FOOTHILL MARKET
8161 W FOOTHILL BLVD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
CA 91730
Transferor's names/license: PAGE WILLIAM 264521
License TVDe Transaction TYPe Fee TYPe Master PUP Date
1.20 OFF-SALE BEER AND PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 SEP 25,1996 $50.00
2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 SEP 25,1996 $34.00
3~ 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA NA YES 0 SEP 25,1996 $100.00
TOTAL $184.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date SEP 25,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (l) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the alx~ve statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninet (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to deTraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may
be withdrawn by either the applicant or the lieensee with no resulting liability to the Department.
Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s)
INNABI ANWAR M J'~
INNABI WERKEN A ~ ~
RECEIVED
O C T 0 2 1996
City of Rancho Cueam
Planning Division onga
ABC 211 (5/96)
· ~ ojoj -
l/.'x ~'>/
APPLICATION
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
DISTRICY SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor' s names/license:
CALIFORNIA
FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
DROPPING
YES
LICENSE(S)
PARTNER
File Number .............. 325023
Receipt Number ......... 1111459
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 10-18-96
Issued Date
RIVERSIDE
SALSA FRESH MEXICAN GRILL
9000 FOOTHILL BLVD STE 102
RANCHO ~CUCAMONGA CA 91730
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
6963 SHAMROCK LANE
ALTA LOMA CA 91701
RECEIVED
NOVO 4 1996
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
License TYPe
Transaction TYPe Fee TYPe Master DUD Date Fee
1.41
2.41
3. NA
ON-SALE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 OCT 18,1996 $300.00:
ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 OCT 18,1996 $205.00:
NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 2 OCT 18,1996 $78.00 :
TOTAL $583. O0
Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage C~;5ol
Have you ever been ~t0 0 or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? IVd
convicted of a felony? Act,
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date OCT 18,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation, named in the foregoing appUc,,ujon, duly aulhodz~d to make this appUcalion on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above smtments therein made are true; (3) thnt no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of n loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than nine (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to ~ee~ud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) thnt the tanslet application may
be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Depnrtment.
Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s)
PLOTKIN BRENDA ANN,
ABC 211 (5~96)
APPLICATION
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If premise licensed:
Type of license
Transferor's names/license:
License Tvpe
CAtltOINiA
FOR
DROPPING
YES
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
File Number .............. 325414
Receipt Number ......... 1113311
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 10-31-96
Issued Date VeTten Trfd
RIVERSIDE
CHINA STAR RESTAURANT
9638 BASELINE ST
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
91701
LIU JOHN CHAO JUN 265593
Transaction TVD~ Fee TYPe Master DUD Date
Fee
1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0
2. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0
3. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0
OCT 30,1996 $150.00:
OCT 30,1996 $205.00:
OCT 30,1996 $39.00:
TOTAL $394.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date OCT 30,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may
be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department.
Applicant Nanhe(s) Applicant Signature(s)
LEE CHUNG LAM
Attach: 23 1
to fnllc, w:. 227 JAIE
1420 E Valley Blvd., #B
Alhambra, Ca. 91801
ABC 211 (5~96)
CALIFORNIA
APPLICATION FOR
TO:
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
3737 Main St., Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 782-4400
DROPPING
YES
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE L I CENSE(S)
File Number .............. 324578
Receipt Number ......... 1109518
Geographical Code ........ 3615
Copies Mailed Date 10-7-96
Issued Date When Trfd
PARTNER
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
Number and Street
City, State Zip Code
County
Is premise inside city limits?
If premise licensed:
Type of license
RIVERSIDE
MOBIL
9315 BASELINE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
YES
CA 91730
Transferor'snames/license: STATION OPERATORS INC 243675
License TYPe Transaction TVDe Fee TYPe Master DUD Date Fee
1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 OCT 04,1996 $50.00 :
2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 OCT 04,1996 $34.00 :
3. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 OCT 04,1996 $78.00:
TOTAL $162.00
Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and Co) that
he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OFCALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date OCT 04,1996
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the
applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the
contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are tree; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in
the applicant or applieant's business to be conducted under the lice e(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not
made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement red into more than ninety (90 days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with
the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any 'tot or feror or to defmu r injure any creditor of n'ansferor: (5) that the transfer application may
be Withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no ng li ty the De n
· ' ' Applicant Signature(s
D . f
RESHAW KATHY LEE
Attach: 231 & 227
ABC 2 11 (5/96)
OCT 14 1996
City of F~ancno Cucamonga
Planning Oivision
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
APPLICATION SIGNATURE SHEET
I Cf PARTNERSHIP E] CORPORATION
E] GENERAL
[] LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
E3 LIMITED
2 File Number License Type
Name(s) Of Applicant(s)
Mailing Address
E] INDIVIDUAL
[] SOLE OWNER
IType Of Transaction
Date:
El OTHER
Premises Address
931.5 Bg.t:~-line }~t., }~3r, cho Q,r~ 91730
4 CORPORATE SIGNATURE
Name: r Title: Date:
I
5 LIMITED LIABILITY MEMBERS
6 GENERAL PARTNERS OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7 LIMITED PARTNERS
('10%or more) and PERCENTAGE OF INTEREST El 10 OR LESS E] MORE THAN 10
% %
% %
% %
% %
% %
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Date
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He/She is an applicant, or one of the
applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this
application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements
therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant Or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or
applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or
proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days
preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any
creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor or transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either
the applicant or the licensee with no resultinQ liability to the Department.
Pdnt Name Y , ' Sign~tu~ '
Print Name Signature
(NAME OF MEMBER)
Date
Date
ABC-211 SIG (9/95)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 18, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager
BY:
Paula Pachon, Management Analyst
SUBJECT:
Approval of Three Month Budeet (April 1, 1997 - June 30. 1997) for
Recreation Activity Center (former Gemco Building,) in the Amount of
$131.230 (Fund 134)
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the three month budget (April 1, 1997 - June 30, 1997) for the community Recreation
Activity Center (former Gemco Building) in the amount of $131,230.00 (Fund 134).
BACKGROUND
The City and the Redevelopment Agency has entered into a lease with Foothill Vineyards Center
(Lewis Homes) for approximately 34,000 square feet of space. The space will be used to offer much
needed recreation programming and services thereby relieving pressue on other existing facilities
and providing more programming area for youth activities..
Lewis Homes is working on tenant improvements for the facility. The anticipated opening date for
the facility will be Spring, 1997. The proposed three month budget will allow for the operation of
the facility for the time frame of April through June, 1997. The revenues and the program budget
is proposed at $131,230. Revenues will be from program fees and charges. The full year operating
budget for fiscal year 1997 will be addressed during the upcoming budget process.
Respectfully submitted,
Suzanne Ota
Community Services Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director~
City Insurance Indemnification
Recommendations:
Approve a policy to adjust the insurance indemnification limit from $5,000,000 to $2,000,000 to
cover all risk exposures and increase the limit depending on the risk by the Risk Management
Analyst and myself.
Background:
Staff has been requested to prepare a report on insurance indemnification limits in relation to City
Contracts. Insurance indemnification is a common business tool used in the public and private
sectors to limit liability exposures to business operations. Work performed by outside City
contractors thlls into this area requiring insurance indemnification or coverage. The City enters into
hundreds of contracts annually and avoids, limits, or transfers the "risks" of doing business to
contractual parties by requiring them to provide a certificate of insurance evidencing insurance
coverage.
Also, the City indemnifies itself against risk through its self-insured program and portfolio of
insurance. In contractual matters the first layer of insurance is the coverage provided by the
contractor. The other layer is the one provided by the City in an effort to protect its asset base.
Based on the City' s claim history the majority of claims/lawsuits have a high potential of penetrating
the first layer and a minority penetrate the second layer causing the City' s risk management and legal
programs to defend the City. Cases in the latter layer requiring settlements mean that a monetary
settlement will be made from both layers and constitute the most cost and risk to the City.
Under the law of Joint and Several Liability, if the City is one-half of one percent negligent in a case
then it can be 100% liable for all damages. In recent years governmental agencies have been viewed
as "deep pockets" especially for uninsured party litigation. The City's risk management program
reviews liability exposures for all City risks and works with the City Attorney's Office on
contractual matters including setting insurance indemnification limits. Once public works contracts
are awarded risk management reviews the insurance certificates against contractual requirements.
Insurance limits are set based on the risk of the job. Insurance standards taken into evaluation
include volume of building activity, traffic pattems, contractors job specifications and requirements,
history of previous litigation, insurance coverage rating, and others that underwriters, insurance
brokers, City Attomeys and risk managers use to assess potential risk. From 1988 to 1994 the City
incurred several large potential claims with a liability exposure of several million dollars. In light
of infrastructure public works improvements, building activity, and a need to cover and indemnify
the City the City Attomey's Office in consultation with the City's risk management program set the
contractual insurance limits at five million dollars for public liability.
With my review of these limits upon evaluating the risk management program I requested the Risk
Management Analyst to conduct a survey of other Cities in the area to determine comparative
insurance requirements (see schedule A for details). On average the twelve Cities require about a
two million dollar insurance limit for liability exposures associated with all risks including public
works contracts. Three of the twelve Cities including ours or 25% percent required five million
dollar limits. The difference generally includes the risk potential of a large public works job. This
means the City should have the discretion based on the risk of a job to use a standard limit and
increase that limit if required especially on large or risk prone jobs.
The City Attomey's Office has reviewed this memorandum and concurs with staffs
recommendations.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawren
Administrative Services Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Comparative Survey
of
Insurance Indemnification Limits
Schedule A
Agency
Brea
Buena Park
Cal Trans
Chino
Corona
Fontana
Montclair
Ontario
Rialto
Riverside
Upland
Rancho
Cucamonga
Limits Per
Contract Amount
2 Million
2 Million
1 Million
1-5 Million
2 Million
1 to 2 Million
1 Million
1 to 2 Million
1 Million
1 to 5 Million
1 to 2 Million
5 Million
Amount of Type of Work
Contract
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sliding Scales
for Insurance
Limits
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY (JASPER
STREET) ADJACENT TO LOT 22 OF TRACT 14072 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC
HOMES
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the disposition of
City owned property (Jasper Street) adjacent to lot 22 of Tract 14072, a full and tree complete
description of said property is set forth in that true and correct copy of the Quitclaim Deed, shown
and described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B', attached hereto the resolution, and authorizing the City
Engineer to sign the Quitclaim Deed and to present same to the County Recorder, along with the
Easement Deed and Certificate of Compliance, to be flied for record, upon adoption of this
Resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tract t 4072 was approved by the City Council on August 21, 1996, and recorded on September 6,
1996, with a 5 foot westerly strip of Jasper Street quitclaimed and incorporated as part of lot 22. The
remaining portion of Jasper Street, a strip of land 32 feet wide approximately 130 feet deep, dead
ending at the Route 30 fi'eeway (future), with underlying utilities, was to be publicly landscaped as
a condition of development of the tract. Jasper Street in this location was originally dedicated to the
County of San Bernardino in fee simple.
During final review and approval of the improvement plans staff was directed to work with the
Developer, Diversified Pacific Homes, regarding the remaining portion of Jasper Street and the
pubic landscaping thereof. Neither the City or Developer felt a strip of land, approximately 130 feet
deep, located between residences was in the best interest of the City or the public. Since the City
owns fee title to this portion of Jasper Street the solution was to quitclaim the property to the
Developer, the Developer in turn granting an easement to the City for the underlying utilities, and
then a lot merger with lot 22 of Tract 14072. The development of lot 22 will now occur with the
strip of land incorporated within that development, maintained by the owner or future owner of said
lot, with easement rights granted for the underlying storm drain and utilities.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
JASPER STREET
December 18, 1996
Page 2
On December 11, 1996, the Planning Commission, by consent agenda, determined the quitclaiming
conforms with the General Plan and though minute action made a finding thereof.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution w/Quitclaim Deed and Exhibits 'A' and 'B ' - Legal description and plat
Exhibit "A"
VICINITY MAP
\f~
HIGHLAND AVE.
___~ ..............................
10 9
\
7 6 5 4 3
HUNTER DRIVE
11 12 13
TRACT NO.
i18
14 15 16 17
14072
PROPOSED RTE. 30 FRWY
19
2O
21 22
AREA OF PROPOSED /
VACATION
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Tract No. 14072
Quitclaim of Jasper Street
RESOLUTION NO.
qG,- 17.3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO
BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
SIGN THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO
THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD
A. Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in that certain real property generally
located southerly of Highland Avenue adjacent to lot 22 of Tract 14072 in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, Califomia, and hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as
"said property." A full and true complete description of said property is set forth in that true and
correct copy of the Quitclaim Deed, shown and described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B', and by this
reference set forth herein.
(ii) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows:
"A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and enjoy real and personal property, and
control and dispose of it for the common benefit."
(iii) Califomia Government Code Section 37351 provides in pertinent part, as follows:
The legislative body (City Council) may... dispose of, and convey such property for the
benefit of the City ..... "
(iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the
findings on December 11, 1996, that disposing of said property, herein contemplated, would be in
conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(v) Said property was originally acquired by the County of San Bernardino in fee for street
purposes.
(vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer
necessary for the purposes for which it was acquired.
(vii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City
of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property.
(viii) Said property has underlying storm drain and utilities which need to be preserved.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
JASPER STREET
December 18, 1996
Page 2
(ix) Said property will be merged with lot 22 of Tract 14072 and incorporated thereon with
the development of said lot.
(x) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution has occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREEFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:
1. All the facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be true
and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds that the quitclaiming of said property to the persons described
in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. An Easement Deed has been reviewed, executed and delivered to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by the persons named on the Quitclaim Deed granting an Easement for storm drain and
utility purposes for the underlying storm drain and utilities within said property. The Easement Deed
is to be presented to the County Recorder to be filed for record concurrently with Quitclaim Deed.
4. A Certificate of Compliance for a lot merger has been reviewed, executed and delivered
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the persons named on the Quitclaim Deed and legal owners
of lot 22 of Tract 14072, which are one in the same, for the merging of the property and lot 22. The
Certificate of Compliance is to be presented to the County Recorder to be filed for record
concurrently with the Quitclaim Deed.
5. That the City Engineer is authorized to sign the Quitclaim Deed and to present same to
the County Recorder, along with the Easement Deed and Certificate of Compliance, per section 3
and 4 above, respectively, to be filed for record, upon adoption of this Resolution.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
RsCQRI~NQ REQUESTED IY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 80'7
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730
---- DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC HOMES, L.P.
· ,_, 10390 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE
c~& RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
SPACE AIOVE TH~ LiNE FOR REC~RDErl
OOCUM!XTAR'rTWA/$$FIXTAX$
COMF~'i=g 045 IrUU. YALUI OF PIK)eIXTY COIfrIYED,
ONCOMIN, rlTDOet FIRJ. YAI.UILEI:IUIJIIA/IO
ENC. JalII,qANCl] IIEMAININQ AT TIME OF $AL!-~'
91720
Corporation Quitclaim Deed
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby uknowledged,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
a cort~radon organized under the laws of the State of California
hereby KEMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLALMS to
DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC HOMES, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
the following descri,'bed real property in the City of Rancho CucamonSa, Cottory
of San Berr~rdino, State of California:
EXHIBITS A AND B ATTACHED HERETO
STAT~ OF CALJFORNIA
COUNTY O; } S.S.
· NoI,~"y PuOfic ,n a,-s,d h3r $a~d ~ m-.d SisIs. $~s-s:t~lb/~
WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, City Enq, ineer
EXHIBIT "A"
A PORTION OF LOTS 5 AND 11 IN BLOCK 19 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF
THE TRACT OF LAND OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, IN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN BOOK 6, PAGE 46 OF MAPS. ALL IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF JASPER
STREET AND HUNTER DRIVE AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO 14072, BOOK
262, PAGES 68, 69 AND 70 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE
SOUTH O0° 37' 23" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89° 36' 15" WEST, 15.0 FEET TO
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 22 OF SAID TRACT NO. 14072;
THENCE SOUTH O0° 37' 23" EAST, 130.89 FEET ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID LOT 22; THENCE NORTH 88° 51' 08" EAST, 32.0
FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16, TRACT NO. 12820,
BOOK 228, PAGES 18 AND 19; THENCE NORTH O0° 37' 23"
WEST, 130.47 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 16;
THENCE SOUTH 89° 36' 15" WEST, 17.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
5CAL,Z:/":~c2,
<, C'
A/
c
I ~
/~-
v.,..,,
c,
'~,
q,
5. a3~'° 5;
_~2.0
o ~,c c.' c
-~3 ,V.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
,-.Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL TO RELEASE REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 6239 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF LEMON AVENUE,
REQUESTED BY LESTER A. AND REBECCA A. DAVIES (APN 201-251-21)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution releasing the Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the
City Clerk to record same.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by the City Council on
April 3, 1986, and recorded on April 26, 1986, as Document No. 86-108004, in the Office of the
County Recorder, San Bemardino County, Califomia. The Agreement was for the installation of
certain public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks
and street pavements along their property frontage on Archibald Avenue. The improvements were
completed and accepted by the City in 1986. The amount stipulated in the agreement has been paid
in full, thus fulfilling the requirement and eliminating the need for the Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi .
City Engineer
WJO:HM:Is
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT WITH LESTER
A. AND REBECCA A. DAVIES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 86-
30, accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement with Lester A. And
Rebecca A. Davies
WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded
in Official Records of San Bemardino County, Califomia, on April 25, 1986, as Document No. 86-
108004; and
WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
does hereby resolve and release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and
that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder
of San Bernardino County, Califomia.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 18, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM:
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY:
Sandra G. Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Approval to Execute Contract for Computer Hardware Maintenance with
Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867 to be Funded
from Contract Services Account Number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year
96/97.
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council 's approval to execute a contract for computer hardware maintenance
with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867. The amount of $55,867 will be
funded from contract services account number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 96/97.
Background/Analysis
The personal computers and printers located throughout the City require periodic maintenance and
repair for older pieces of equipment and warranty equipment. Westek Computer Services Inc.
provides these services on hardware throughout various departments of the City. For the last eight
years, Westek Computer Services has continued to provide exceptional maintenance and support to
the City. These services are budgeted annually and Council is required to approve the current
contract.
In the event the City no longer requires the services currently being provided, the terms of
maintenance may be terminated with a thirty day written notice. These pieces of equipment are
essential for the support of the City' s Network and personal computers within the City.
Respectfully submitted,
Administrative Services Director
Attachment: Westek Computer Services Maintenance Agreement
COMRITER
SERVICES INC.
Q 1001 S. Placentla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
n 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Dale
Expiration Dale
InitlaJ Agreement
Addendum
# RC-96/97
7-1-96
6-3097
Equipment Location Address
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.
909-989-1851
TEL:
Billing Address
91729
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
CONTACT: TEL:
ITEM MODEL NO.
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO.
CONTACT:
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG.
ANNUALCHGS.
I 486/33M
2 IIID
3 386/25SX
4 IIIP
5 *KXP1123
6 183
7 286
8 LTE286
9 386/20E
10 386/16
COMPAQ W/4MG RAM, 120MG HD, 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD. VGA DISP.AY,
& KYBD. ~ffi247HBN21058, 6247HBN20852 2
HP LASER (KATHY J., FIN.)g3221J23398 1
BINARY PC W/4MG RAM, 124MG HD. 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD. MONITCR
KYBD, (GREAT/RC POLICE),f326419 1
HP LASER #3103J61L3J 1
PANASON IC ~e2BM DL53527 ( DED. ) 1
ZENITH LAPTOP W/EXT. H.D. #8351225602 1
NBI PC W/FDD & 20MB HD #C57616162 1
COMPAQ Wt640k RAM, 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD. & KYBD. 2
#695HAF30616. 6019AC31740
COMPAQ W/640k RAM, 1.2MG FDD, 100MG HD, 150MG COMPAQ
TAPE DR., ~4844HS440285 1
COMPAQ W/2MG RAM. 1.2MG FDD, 40MG HD. VGA DISPLAY, KYED. 10
#HO280,H2549,H1394,H2321,H1713.H2519,H1755,H2513,H1444,1-<)189
384
240
384
$768.00
$360.00
$336.00
$384.00
$90.00
$504.00
$252.00
$480.00
$576.00
$3840.00
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
'RTLE
DATE
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
'nTLE President
Dennis Raney
DATE
Pg. 2
COMPUTER
SLItVICES INC.
r"! 1001 S. Placentla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
n 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
# RC-96/97
7-1-96
6 30-07
Equipment Location Address
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.
909-989-1851
TEL:
Billing Address
91729
CONTACT: SANDY RAMIRF_.Z EXT20%L:
ITEM MODEL NO.
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO.
CONTACT:
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG.
ANNUALCHGS.
1' 386/'20e
12 386Sr20
13 486/331
14 386/25M
15 386SX
16 PC
17 486
18 386
COMPAQ VV~ 4MG RAM, 1.2MG FDD, VGA DISPLAY, 40MG HD, & K/'BD.,
#4036855H0173, 4041H58H0020 2
COMPAQ W/ 2MB RAM, 1.2MB FDD, 60MB HD, VGA DISPLAY, & K'vBD.
~*4032HAN20182, 4026HAN10618 2
COMPAQ DESKPRO, 120 MB HD, 4 MB RAM, 3.5 FDD, 5.25 FDD, VGA
DISPLAY, AND KYBD. ~6226HC52055. 1
COMPAQ DESKPRO 120 MB HD, 4 MB RAM, 3.5 FDD, 5.25 FDD, MATH
CO-PROCESSOR, VGA DISPLAY, & KYBD.
//4202HBR10716 & t~,-4210HBR30527.
AST BRAVO, 2 MB RAM, 1.2 FDD, 40 MB HD, VGA COLOR DISPLAY, &
KYBD. S/Ns1570, 1914, 3533, 3577, NO'S TWB3052238, 3484, 226<., &
2248.
IBM CONVERTIBLE W/512K RAM, 720K FDD, A1-321-024712.
COMPAQ LTE 4/25C, 120 MG HD, 4 MG RAM, EXT. BATTERY CHARGER
W/ADAPTER.//931 H DL41334. 1
CONTURA PORTABLE 3/25c. 120 HD, 4 MG RAM, 1.44 MG FDD.
#7252HCH33697.
336
336
384
336
$672.00
$672.O0
$408.00
$768.00
$2688,00
$216.00
$384.00
$384.00
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
'RTLE
DATE
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
President
Dennis Rancy
DATE
Pg. 3
COMPUTER
SEllVICES INC.
n 1001 S. Placentla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
n 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
Equipment Location Address
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.
909-989-1851
TEL:
Billing Address
91729
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
CONTACT: TEL:
ITEM MODEL NO.
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO,
CONTACT:
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG.
15 341E*
2C 341'
21 321SL*
22 P351'
23 P351C*
24 P341SL
25 P341SL*
26 LQ2500*
27 FX-285'
28 FX- 100'
29 ANADEX*
TOSHIBA PRINTER #ZY14514, ZY18345, ZY15155, ZA12696, 4
TOSHIBA PRINTER, # ZA131284, PAl 6313,ZA12702 3
TOSHIBA PRINTER. #ZA19910, ZA43516, ZA23241, ZA19912,ZA46257 5
TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO. ZA34320. 1
TOSHIBA PRINTER NO'S ZA14588, ZA13983, ZA13978, ZA14595,
ZA14302. 5
TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO. ZA46249 1
TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO'S ZA16750, ZA42678, ZA46250, ZA46002
ZA46245, ZA46244, ZA46257 7
EPSON PRINTER. NO'S 12011833.11015308 2
EPSON CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. 04011237. 1
EPSON CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. 545534. 1
ANADEX CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. UO3039. 1
132.00
132
120
144
120
156
# RC-96/97
7-1-96
6-30-97
ANNUALCHGS.
$528.00
$396.00
$600.00
$132.00
$720.00
$216.00
$840.00
$312.00
$84.00
$84.00
$204.00
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
TITLE
DATE
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print}
T1TLE President
Dennis Raney
DATE
COMPUTER
SEllVICES INC.
[:) 1001 S. Placentia Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 525-0744
Q 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Date
Expiration Die
Initial Agreement
Addendure
E~II4ThtngFTtP. Ae~~ei~VIONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.
909-989-1851
TEL:
Billing Address
91729
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
CONTACT: TEL:
CONTACT:
ITEM MODEL NO.
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO.
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG.
3C 293*
31 294
32 83A*
33 192+*
34 440*
35 182*
36 LQ2550'
37 FX1050*
3e LQ1070
3f; P351 *
4(:: S-Ill
41 S-lID
4; S-IIID
OKIDATA CHARACTER PRINTER. NO'S. 3906, 607A
OKIDATA PRINTER, NO. 601 A0037779.
OKIDATA MICROLINE PRINTER. NO'S 230078
OKIDATA PRINTER. NO. 611 A1056316.
TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO. 'S 20-0810710, 20-0810682.
OKIDATA PRINTER. NO. 602B0151744.
EPSON PRINTER. NO. 00F007200.
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
EPSON PRINTER. NO'S 00D101544671, ODD1024020, 0El 0' 33857. 3
EPSON PRINTER. NO. 49G0023827 (GENERAL/MAINTENArvCE.) 1
TOSHIBA PRINTER. ~PB14507. 1
HP LASERJET ~K3104JD5762 1
HP LASERJETW/ENV. FEEDER ~r2830J10321,2934J19021 2
HP LASERJET #B3022J16530,65286447,6529,6531 5
108
108
84
336
360
# RC-96/97
7-1 -~"~
6-30-91
ANNUAL CHGS.
$108. O0
$108.00
$216.00
$84.00
$216.00
$84,00
$108.00
$252.00
$84.00
$132.00
$336.00
$672.00
$1800.00
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
TITLE
DATE
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUALTOTAL
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Setvices, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
TITLE President
Dennis Ranev
DATE
Pg. 5
COMRITER
SERVICES INC.
r-m 1001 S. Placentis Avenue. Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
rl 67652 Ramon Rd.. Cathedral CIty, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Da~e
Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
# RC-96/97
7-1
0-30-97
EGB'iV'n0EtP. j~8~:XelI~/&MONGA
Billing Address
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729
909-989-1851
SANDY RAMIRE. Z EXT 2082
TEL: CONTACT:
TEL:
CONTACT:
ITEM MODEL NO.
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO.
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG.
43 S-I
HP LASERJET # 2424179549
44 486
COMPAQ PROLINEA WI COLOR DISPLAY,MOUSE & KYBD.
(GEN./RDS #1 POLICE #A339HER31046,A339HER31047,384,756
4 384
45 S-4
HP LASERJET (GENERAL/RECORDS #2 POLICE.) ~V, JPBG062261.
JPBD004906.JPFF036926,JPGF007301 ,JPFH024035,JPJJ002254
SJPGK091806,SUSFB202928
8 336
41E 4+
HP LASERJET 4+, (LORI GEMBELLA/POLICE. NO. JPFF019370;
JPFH011013,JPFF014118,JPFF019366,JPFK018395
5 360
47 5300
NEC PRINTWRITER (FIRE/FINANCE. SERIAL NO. 672021669LX.) 1
48 286E
COMPAQ DESKPRO, 2 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 80 MB HD, VGA DISPLAY,
KYBD, S/N'S 4001HZ3H0751, 4006HZEH1366, 4816AM3B1312. 3
336
4~ 286
IBM XT, 640 KB RAM, 1.2 MB FDD, 1.44 FDD, 20 MB HD, DISPLAY, KYBD.
5162-1069633. 1
5C 486
COM PAQ LTE LAPTOP, 4MB RAM. 120 MB HD. S/N 6236HBGF30224. 1
ANNUAL CHGS.
$360.00
$1536.00
$2688.00
$1800.00
$264.00
$1008.00
$384.00
$384.00
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
TITLE
DATE
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
TITLE President
Dennis Rane7
DATE
47
Pg. 6
COMPUTER
SEllVICES INC.
n 1001 S. Placentla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
Q 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
EffeclNe Die
Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
a~'r~nQ~ IL~aL~e"'~C~,~I~-s~MONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729
909-989-1851
TEL:
ITEM MODEL NO,
5' 486SL
52 486
53 486 DX2
54 DJ 320
55 4S 1 MX
56 4M
57 DJ560C
58 M2 4/501
59 M24/501
60 M 24/501
61 M24/66
Billing Address
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
CONTACT: TEL:
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. QTY.
NEC VERSA LAPTOP, S/N 42007670. MONO DISPLAY, 4MB RAM 1
COMPAQ PROLINEA COMPUTER W/8 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 ME HD,
VGA DISPLAY, & KYBD. S/N A339HER31375. 1
TOSHIBA SATELLITE 320 MB HD, 8 MB RAM. ffi:)4432931 1
HP PRINTER. SMY49S2M031. 1
HP LASERJET PRINTER. S/N'S USFB502712, USFB502454,
USBF398104, SUSFB399874, USFB379526, USFB399516. 6
HP LASERJET. S/N JPBGO91963. 1
DESKJET, S/N SSG44K152DP. 1
HP VECTRA PC, 16 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KvBD,
MOUSE, (APPENDIX A)
SAME CONFIG. AS ~S3 W/1.2 MG FDD.
SAME CONFIG. AS ~63 W/CD ROM DRIVE.
HP VECTRA P, 16 MG RAM, 1.44 MB FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KYBD,
MOUSE. S/N'S 343A04611, 3420A00697, 3420A00865, 3420A0053(,
3420A00521. 3420A00757, & 3420A00463,3420A00675,
8
CONTACT:
ANNUAL
UNIT CHG.
408
15' 72
6 72
2 72
72
# RC-96/97
7-1
0-30-~7
ANNUAL CHGS.
$576.00
$384.00
$564.00
$216.00
$2448.00
$408.00
$264.00
$11304.00
$432.00
$144.00
$576.00
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
TITLE
DATE
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCEEVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Sen/ices, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
TITLE President
Dennis Raney
DATE
Pg. 7
COMPUTER
SERVICES INC.
rl 1001 S. Placentla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
n 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral CIty. CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
E~ {)Nd~,-o~Ok~I~mJMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHOCUCAMONGA. CA. 91729
909-989-1851
ITEM
TEL:
MODEL NO.
586
63 4/66
64 XP60
65 ULTRA
66 ULTRA
67 ULTRA
68 3.12
6~ VL5/100
7C VL3 5/100
71 5/66
Billing Address
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
CONTACT: TEL:
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. QTY.
HP PENTIUM, 40 MG RAM, 1.44 MG FDD, CD ROM DRIVE, 1.05
GIG HD, MOUSE, KYBD. S/N'S 3415S00589, 3415S00672,
3415S00659, 3415S00667. 4
LM M2000 HP NET SERVER WI132 MB RAM, 13 GB ARRAY, MONO VGA,
NE 3200 LAN CARD, MOUSE. KYBD. S/N 3336S00618. 1
HP VECTRA PC W/16 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KYBD,
MOUSE. #3415S00639. 1
14 IN COLOR VGA (SEE APPENDIX B).
17 IN. COLOR VGA (SEE APPENDIX B).
21 IN. COLOR VGA ( DAN WATERS, POLICE.)
NOVELL NETWARE (SINGLE SERVER).
HP VECTRA PC, 850 MG, 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD (DUAL FDD), CD-ROM,
KYBD, MOUSE, S/N 3500A00731 (LIBRARY). 1
HP VECTRA PC, RAM. 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD ( DUAL FDD) KYBD, MOUSE
#3529A04289. 1
HP NET SERVER RAM, CD-ROM, 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD. ( DUAL FDD),
KYBD. MOUSE, S/N 3417800160 (DAN WATERS/POLICE). I
CONTACT:
142
13
1
1
ANNUAL
UNIT CHG.
72
48
48
# RC-96/97
71t'i'
6-30-9/
ANNUAL CHGS.
$288.00
$360.00
$72.00
$681600
$624.00
$52.80
$540.00
$72.00
$72.00
$72.00
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
TITLE
DATE
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUAL TOTAL
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Print)
T1TLE President
Dennis Raney
DATE
Pg. 8
COMPUTER
SERVICES INC.
n 1001 S. Placentia Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744
Q 67652 Ramon Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594
BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Agreement No.
Effective Date
· Expiration Date
Initial Agreement
Addendum
# RC-96/97
/-1
6-30-97
E~Y'P~h~L'~(:~'L:!f{..~/~MONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.
909-989-1851
TEL: CONTACT:
ITEM
MODEL NO.
Billing Address
91729
SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082
TEL:
DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO.
CONTACT:
ANNUAL
QTY.
UNIT CHG,
ANNUALCHGS,
72
40 HOURS { $50 PER HOUR, ON-SITE SERVICE
40 50
$2000.00
Coverage on items 63-72 & 74-76 are for On-site extended
warranty service. (All parts,labor & travel)
Total agreement price ................................$58,806.80
** Less 5% semi - annual discount .......... $ 55,866.46
*** Less 10% annual discount ...................$ 52,926.12
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS
ANNUALTOTAL
ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER
COMPANY
NAME
ACCEPTED BY WESTEK
Westek Computer Services, Inc
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
REPRESENTATIVE
(Please Pdnt)
President
Dennis Ranev
DATE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 18, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF FIVE FEET OF
EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG MAIN STREET AND ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-21, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE NORTH TOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject
agreement and security, ordering the summary vacation of five feet of excess right-of-way along
Main Street and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement, and to present the vacation document to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Development Review No. 95-21 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on May 22, 1996, to construct a 14 unit apartment project on 1.38 acres of land with a
low-medium residential designation, located on south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet
east of Archibald Avenue.
The Developer, North Town Housing Development Corporation, is submitting an Improvement
Agreement accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
and completion of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance:
Labor and Materialmen Bond:
$23,432.00
$11,716.00
_j
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 95-21
NORTH TOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.
December 18, 1996
Page 2
As a condition of approval, the project was required to vacate 5 feet of excess fight-of-way along
Main Street to allow for a 30-foot half-street width as measured from the street centerline. On the
22nd day of May 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly notice public hearing and determined the vacation is consistent with the General Plan and made
a finding thereof. Section 8331 of the Streets and Highways Code states local agencies may
summarily vacate a street or highway if it is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, for
a period of five consecutive years has been impassable for vehicular travel and no public money was
expended for maintenance.
Copies of the agreement and security, and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by
the property owner(s) are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi . O~eil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
C/L MAIN STREET
PROJECT: DR 95-21
APN 209-262-02
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DR 95-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 95-21
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an
Improvement Agreement submitted by the North Town Housing Development Corporation, for the
improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga public right-of-way, generally located on
south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 95-21; and
WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient
Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and
Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. t~(./.,/7Q7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF FIVE
FEET OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG MAIN
STREET
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highways Code, the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate five feet of excess
right-of-way along Main Street, herein more particularly described; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the five feet of excess
right-of-way along Main Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it
has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years, no public money was expanded for
maintenance of same, and is consistent with the General Plan of the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the five feet of excess
right-of-way along Main Street, as shown on map V-138, on file in the office of the City Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description and plat
which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B", and by reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said five feet of excess
right-of-way along Main Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement.
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits
to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution,
and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
C/L MAIN STREET
AREA OF PROPOSED
VACATION (5' wide)
PROJECT: DR 95-21
APN 209-262-02
N.T.~.
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Map
V- 138
MAIN STREET
VACATION
EXit!BIT "A"
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of Main Street
That portion of Main Street adjoining Lots I through 12 inclusive, and the easterly 12.50 feet
of Lot 13, Block 9, Town of West Cucamonga, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 13, Page I of Maps, in the
office of the Recorder of said County, together with that portion of Reid Avenue that would
attach by law as vacated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, per Resolution No. 91-312,
recorded November 5, 1991, as Instrument No. 422515 of Official Records, described as
follows:
The southerly 5.00 feet of said Main Street bounded on tile west by tile northerly
projection of the westerly line of the easterly 12.50 feet of said Lot 13,.and bounded on
the east by the northerly projection of the easterly line of said vacation of Reid Avenue.
Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a sketch, Exhibit "B".
N L,~{t.3 Ho. 292 ?4
· .. ,
i--__I
~o
ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
-
WESTERLY UNE OF FAST 12.50' OF L01 13
LOT
13
LOT 12
LOT 11
LOT 10
LOT 9
LOT 8 "?'=..._~,
LOT 7
LOT 6'
LOT 5
,_
LOT
I I Illill/'~'/'t"'= -
:~~~ ~.~"<-.,~;~
~IX~ -~ ~ LOT 2
~ .....
~ LOT 1
,~S + PORTION OF RED AvE. V~1ED BY C~
~ --OF ~CHO C~OH~ RESOL~OH NO. -
"ll~)l,'l k
91-312 REC, NOV, 5, 1991 INST, NO,
422515.
EASTERLY UNE Of WESIERLY 1/2
OF RBD AW..HUE VACATED,
"V
35'-----
FTi
REID
AVE
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
2 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-21
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, 'including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I
1
AND
C/L MAIN STREET
;>
.<
<
<
PROJECT: DR 95-21
APN 209-262-02
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROJECT: DR 95-21
File: h:\exhibits\ast95-21
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: DR 95-21
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist.
S1
S2
5800L
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L
4 .........
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
LI
Turf Non-Turf Trees
S.F. S.F. Ea.
....... 11
Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel DU S 1 S2 L 1
N/A 14 14 --- 11
Annexation Date: December 18, 1996
Form Date 11/16/94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2, AND SETTING THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING FOR JANUARY 15, 1997, FOR THE VACATION OF AGATE
STREET AND DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY
QUITCLAIMING LOT 'C' OF TRACT 6846, FOR TRACT NO. 15730,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NWC OF BERYL AND MIGNONETTE
STREETS, SUBMITTED BY DPDC RANCHO 45/LTD., A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map No.
15730, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and setting the
date of the public hearing for January 15, 1997, for the vacation of Agate Street and disposition of
City owned property by quitclaiming lot 'C' of Tract 6846, and authorizing the Mayor and the City
Clerk to sign said agreement; and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the City Engineer to
present the Tract Map to the County Recorder to be filed for record; and authorizing the City Clerk
to publish 14 days prior to the date set for the public hearing the resolution of the City's intent to
vacate and disposition of City owned property.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tentative Tract Map No. 15730, generally located at the northwest comer of Beryl and Mignonette
Streets, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 24, 1996, for a residential subdivision
of 28 single family lots on 5.66 acres of land.
One of the conditions for the development of the Tentative Tract Map is to vacate Agate Street and
regrade to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and adjacent property owners, and construct public
improvements along Hamilton Street. On October 9, 1996, the Planning Commission, by consent
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 15730 - DPDC RANCHO 45/Ltd.
December 18, 1996
Page 2
claiming lot 'C' of Tract 6846 conforms with the General Plan and through minute action made a
finding thereof.
The Developer, DPDC Rancho 45/Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, is submitting an
agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond (TR 15730):
Faithful Performance Bond (Agate St. Vac.):
Labor and Materialmen Bond (TR 15730):
Labor and Materialmen Bond (Agate St. Vac.):
Monumentation (cash deposit):
$213,595
$13,880
$106,798
$6,940
$3,800
Copies of the agreement and security, and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by
the property owner(s) are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
VICINITY MAP
Z
.<
BANYAN STREET
PROPOSED RTE 30
19TH STREET
HAMILITON STREET
BASE LINE ROAD
;>
<
Z
AGATE STREET
PROPOSED VACATION
PROJECT
LOCATION
TR 15730
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Tract No. 15730
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA;
APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15730, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15730, submitted by DPDC Rancho 45/Ltd., a
California Limited Partnership, consisting of 28 lots, generally located at the northwest comer of
Beryl and Mignonette Streets, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on July 24, 1996; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15730 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, monumentation security has been provided; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security, by DPDC Rancho 45/Ltd., a Califomia Limited
Partnership, as developer; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Tract Map No. 15730.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Tract Map No. 15730 be and the same is
hereby approved and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the City Engineer to present same to
the County Recorder to be filed for record.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA;
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT
MAP NO. 15730
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and heating or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
/--
EX,!IIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
S"I'I~.IEET LIGHTING 51AINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. l AND 2
LMD MAINTENANCE AI:~:_,A '
---PROJECT: TILACT15730
CITY OF ILakNCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BEI~NAI~d)INO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TIC, X. CT 15730
Fil,,:: h:\cxhibits',tr 15730
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1 ---
S2 11
LANDSCAPING:
9500L
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: Tract 15730
NUMBER OF LAMPS
16.000L 22,000L
Community
Equestrian
Trail Turf
Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F.
L 1 N/A N/A
L 1 N/A N/A
27,500L
Non-Turf
S.F.
2.637
N/A
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel DU S 1 S2 L 1
N/A 28 28 28 28
Trees
Ea.
11
45
Beryl St.
Tract
Annexation Date: December 18, 1996
Form Date 11/16/94
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE '
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
VACATE AGATE STREET AND DISPOSITION OF
CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING
LOT 'C' OF TRACT 6846
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, et. seq.,
of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 37350 and
37351 of the California Government Code, for the disposition of City owned property.
SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate Agate Street and
disposition of City owned property by quitclaiming lot 'C' of Tract 6846, as shown on Map V-139,
legal descriptions and plats, and Quitclaim Deed, legal descriptions and plats, respectively, and by
reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 4: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 15th day of January,
1997, at 7:(10 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed
vacations for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or
prospective street purposes.
SECTION 5: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be posted
conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 14 days
before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each
of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering
not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET AND
DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY".
SECTION 6: The subject vacation and disposition of City owned property shall be subject
to the reservations, exceptions, and abandonment, if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the
same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 14 days before the date set for the hearing,
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
TRAgT Nrj.
HAMILTON STREET
N89'40'58
'E 100.00'
43 ~/~ 41
/~~ 42
<~/// ~'
7o.oo' ~'L~ ~ _,3o~,/'~ 70.00'
60,00'
LDT 'C' ~ .O.B.
TRACT N~. 6846 T~ACT N~. 6846
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Map
V- 139
AGATE STREET
VACATION AND
QUIT-CLAIM OF
LOT 'C'
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 S89°40'58"W 654.20 FEET FROM
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING
SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C"
N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C"
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT
43 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00°19'02"W 99.00 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00" AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF
31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS
SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE N89040'58"E 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID LOT "C"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT "C°' S89°40'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF,
K'K~NNETH G. Oi3ELLETTE P.L.S. 6124
EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98
~~i% 14
Exp, 3/31/98
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE: 1"= 50'
b
(R)
HAMILTON
N89'40'58"E
STREET
D = 90'00'00" 30'
R = 20.00'
b
L = 31.42' b
o c~
T = 20.00'
o
P.O.B. o
N.W. "-
LOT "C"
o
N00'19'p2"W co
1.00
70.00' 50' 1
j P.O.C. J--~
S W C:OR. LOT "C
L6T' "C" 1' W[0E
LINE S89'4(
TRACT NO. 6846 30.00'
b
(R)
90'00'00
20.00'
51.42'
20.00'
S89'40'58'"W 654.20'd''' Y
I
ALLARD ENGINEERING
Civil Engineering Land Planning
(909) 899-5011 Fox 899-5014
6101 Cherry Avenue
Fontono. CA 92336
7)
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT N0. 6846
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON
SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 S89°40'58"W 594.20 FEET FROM
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING
SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C"
N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C"
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT
42 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00°l 9'02"W 99.00 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00" AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF
31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS
SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE S89°40'58"W 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID LOT "C"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N89°40'58"E 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
K~NETH G. OOELLETTE P.L.S. 6124
EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98
OF C ~,L\~%%\'~'
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE: I,,= 50'
TRAg'r Nrj. SB4S
b
~ ~_HAMILTON STREET
r,"j I
S89'40'58"W
(R)
D = 90'00'00" 30'
R = 20.00'
L 31.42'
=-' O
T =20.00'
o
44 43
O
.,-
o
z
70.00'
SO/UTH LOT "C" /
1' WIDE
LINE N89'40'58"E
TRACT NO. 6846 30.00'
b
b
(R)
D = 90'00'00"
20.00'
31.42'
20.00'
P.0.B.
N.E. COR.
LOT "C"
NOO'19'O2"W
1.00'
70.00' 6~~NJ
S89'40'58"W 594.20'
P.O.C. '
S.E. COR.
ALLARD ENGINEERING
Civil Engineering Land Planning
(909) 899-5011 Fox 899-5014
8101 Cherry Avenue
Fontono, CA 92356
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
?-
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
c~ &
S~ae~ L
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $
COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED,
__OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND
ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE,
Signatutw of Declarant or Agent detem~|ntng tax. FIm~ Name
Corporation Quitclaim Deed
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California
hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to
the following described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino. State of California:
EXHIBITS 'A' .zUND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF } S.S.
On before me,
a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, City Engineec
Assessou Parcel No.
FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP
personally known to me tot proved to me on the basis ot satisfactory
evidence) Io be lh6 person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me thal he/shetlhey executed
the same in his/hertlheit authorized capacityties), and that by his/her~heir
signature(s) on Ihe instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf
ol which the person(s) acted, execuled the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14
THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C", SAID POINT
BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO.
6846 S89°40'58"W 654.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
WEST LINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C N89°40'58"E 30.00
FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID
TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 1.00
FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE S89040'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" 'ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
K~N~NETH G. b'UELLETTE P.L.S. 6124
EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98
Q_
,
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE:
N
TBACT NrJ. 8848
lx~]8, 12B, PAM8,~ 14-17
44
b
~ ~_HAM_ILT__O_N S_TRE_ET
N89'40'58"E 100.00'
~Q'O2LgL022~/ ~
(R) F-x-a
O = 90'00'00"
R = 20.00' b
L = 31.42' o
T = 20.00' d
o
0
30'
b
b
(R)
D = 90'00'00"
R = 20.00'
L = 31.42'
i:::,' T = 20.00'
o
o
· - 42
Ld
o
,,,--
o
o
70.00'
f 30C, j~x~O,, 1 b ~
p fOS~Z8%'40'58''W 594.20'''/L'
] ~ .0.. 654.20'
LSGE" "C"R' SOUTHEAST CORN
TRACT NO. 6846
43 <.h
N00'~ 9'02"W LOT C
P.0.B. 1.00' · ....
SW COR. S89'40 58"w 30.00'
LOT "C"
ALL,4RP ENGINEERING Dr, TAIL "A"
N.T.S,.
Civil Engineering Lond Plonning
(909) 899-5011 Fox 899-5014-
6101 Cherry Avenue
Font. ano, CA 92356
S00'19'02"E
1.00'
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
sat
City &
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
f-
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
L
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $
__.COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED,
OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND
ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE.
SlgnetuN of Declarmnl or Agent daletraining tax. Firm Name
Corporation Quitclaim Deed
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California
hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to
the following described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of San Bernardino. State of California:
EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF } S.S.
On before me,
a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, City Engineer
Assessor Parcel No.
FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satistactory
evidence) to be thi person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrumenl and acknowledged to me that he/she,qhey executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacitVties). and that by his/her/their
signature(s) On the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf
of which Ihe person(s) acted. executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14
THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C", SAID POINT
BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO.
6846 S89°40'58"W 594.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
EAST LINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C S89°40'58"W 30.00
FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID
TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00019'02"E 1.00
FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE N89°40'58"E 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" .ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
~NZ'NETH G. ~UELLETTE P.L.S. 6124
EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE:
44
HAMILTON STREET
b
b
N89'40'58"
(R)
D = 90'00'00"
R = 20.00'
L = 31.42'
T = 20.00'
E 100.00'
50'
b
(R)
b
C4
O
D = 90'00'00"
R = 20.00'
L = 31.4-2'
T = 20.00'
42 4l
70.00' ;. 3o'.f-~. _3.o_' 7.' .3. o% 70.00' .,'r-
,o/,,. '°' ''~'' / "~'~o~""'X ~.o.Y°'''''' ""'°'
TRACT NO. TRACT NO. 6846
S00'1 g'O2"E
1.00'
ALLARD ENGINEERING
Civil Engineering Lond Planning
(909) 899-5011 Fox 899-5014
6101 Cherry Avenue
Fontana, CA 92336
~O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
APPROVAL TO RELEASE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND LABOR AND
MATERIAL BOND (RAILROAD CROSSINGS) FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 12959-1
(CAPELLINO BROTHERS), IN THE AMOUNTS OF $223,095.67 AND $111,547.84,
RESPECTIVELY.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and
Material Bond (Railroad Crossing) for Parcel Map No. 12959-1 (Capellino Brothers), in the amounts
of $223,095.67 and $111,547.84 (Bond Nos. 1220822), respectively.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The project located on the south side of Arrow Highway, west and adjacent to the Santa Fe Railway
spur was conditioned to improve the railway crossing at Arrow Highway. The Developer received
a fee credit for the work to be completed. Due to the long lead time required by the railroad, the City
elected to complete the work as a capital project. The credit fees have been remitted to the City by
the Developer. The City has obtained a contractor and work began the week of December 9, 1996.
Therefore, it is recommended that the subject bonds be released by the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O?qeil
City Engineer
WJO:MP:dlw
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE
PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS
FOR PLANNING AND
HISTORIC
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council consider the attached options and adopt the appropriate ordinance to define
the terms for the Planning and Historic Preservation Commissioners or direct staff to begin
recruiting to fill positions in January 1997 to be in compliance with the existing ordinance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
At the November 20, meeting, Council Member Paul Biane initially raised a question regarding
Commissioners' terms. The issue was placed on the December 4 City Council agenda for
discussion. Following the discussion, staff was directed to return to this meeting with optional
ordinances for Council consideration. Staff has also included an exhibit that illustrates the current
terms of the Commissioners and a time line showing the options.
The current terms of the Planning and Historic Preservation Commissioners, as set by the City
Council in November 1993, are as follows:
Chairman E. David Barker July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1998
Vice Chairman Larry T. McNiel July 1, 1994, through June 30, 1998
Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Au ust 5, 1996, through June 30 1998
(Appointed to fill remaimng term of ~c~mm ssioner Heinz Lumpp)
Commissioner William Bethel July 1, 1996, through June 30, 2000
Commissioner Richard Macias July 1, 1996, through June 30, 2000
2esPjZn~
Attachments:
Commission Term Time Line
Ordinance for Option II
Ordinance for Option III
Ordinance for Option IV
_J
900~: 'N-VP
~00~ "INP
g00~: 'NVI'
~00~: 'AON NOI/O393
'b'00~ 'gRP
'1700~ 'NVP
~00~ 'TAP
LLI
Z
£00~ 'NVP
~:00~: 'AON
~:00~: "lRl"
~oo~ 'NVP
~ zz
I..00~: 'qRF'
1,00~: 'NVP
000~: 'AON NOIJ, O=I'I=t
F'- 000~ "IN/' :
rr' 000~ 'NVP
LLI
I'-
z
O
09 9661, 'AON NOIIO:t'I::t
C/] 966L 'TNP
8661, 'NVI'
6661- "tPIF -~
6661,'NVF ~
O
O z66 b "'lAP
Z661, 'NVi'
966 l. 'AON NOIIOB'E]
966 I,
9661- 'NVF
966L 'TNP -~-
9661. 'NVf' ~,
· lz66L 'AON NOIIOd'l=l
· 1;,66 !.. ""IRF []
lz661, 'NVP
g661, NVF ¢
.... >
~ 0
oz
-oc~d
"" '~ O -,-,
C) C) (D
o~ _
~CDCTCD
C'4 O CD
O') CD C,,I
c~c7~
"o
r,,:cDcocn
C'q C~
Q O') ,--
cn
(D
>_ ,_ >- c,
r-
-o >-> >.
0 r-uj
> "0
~uj ~0
cEE
0 Q, Q,.
~ o .o
~ Ee_e
c > ,
--- O '~
~ Z ~ o
0
Q- .C .__ c
~OOO
> ......
(D O O O
-- >
zzzz
0000
I--F--I--I--
nQ..nn
0000
me+
ORDINANCENO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE
MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section 2.20.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2.20.050 Membership - Length of terms.
A. The five members of the Planning Commission initially
appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Three
members shall serve a term of four years and shall continue in
office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed
as provided in the ordinance codified herein, and their
successors shall be appointed for terms of four years. Two
members shall serve for a term of two years and shall continue
in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner
removed as provided in Section 2.20.060, and their successors
shall be appointed for terms of four years. If a vacancy shall
occur, other than by expiration of the term of office, it shall be
filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the
Council for the unexpired term. The term of any Planning
Commissioner shall be extended for that length of time as may
be necessary and convenient to appoint and set a successor
Planning Commissioner.
B. The term of office of each present member of the
Planning Commission, presently scheduled to expire on the first
day of January of an applicable odd-numbered year, is extended
to the first day of July of the even-numbered year succeeding the
scheduled time which each such term is set to expire.
Thereafter, Planning Commission members shall be appointed
to their customary scheduled terms to commence on the first day
of July of even-numbered years."
Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Option II
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE
MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section 2.20.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2.20.050 Membership - Length of terms.
A. The five members of the Planning Commission initially
appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Three
members shall serve a term of four years and shall continue in
office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed
as provided in the ordinance codified herein, and their
successors shall be appointed for terms of four years. Two
members shall serve for a term of two years and shall continue
in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner
removed as provided in Section 2.20,060, and their successors
shall be appointed for terms of four years. If a vacancy shall
occur, other than by expiration of the term of office, it shall be
filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the
Council for the unexpired term. The term of any Planning
Commissioner shall be extended for that length of time as may
be necessary and convenient to appoint and set a successor
Planning Commissioner.
B. The term of office of each present member of the
Planning Commission, presently scheduled to expire on the first
day of January of an applicable odd-numbered year, is extended
to the first day of January of the even-numbered year
succeeding the scheduled time which each such term is set to
expire. Thereafter, Planning Commission members shall be
appointed to their customary scheduled terms to commence on
the first day of January of even-numbered years."
Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. ,_~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE
MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Section 2.20.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2.20.050 Membership - Length of terms.
A. The five members of the Planning Commission initially
appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Three
members shall serve a term of four years and shall continue in
office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed
as provided in the ordinance codified herein, and their
successors shall be appointed for terms of four years. Two
members shall serve for a term of two years and shall continue
in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner
removed as provided in Section 2.20.060, and their successors
shall be appointed for terms of four years. If a vacancy shall
occur, other than by expiration of the term of office, it shall be
filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the
Council for the unexpired term. The term of any Planning
Commissioner shall be extended for that length of time as may
be necessary and convenient to appoint and set a successor
Planning Commissioner,
B. The term of office of each present member of the
Planning Commission, presently scheduled to expire on the first
day of January of an applicable odd-numbered year, is extended
to the first day of July of the year which each such term is
scheduled to expire. Thereafter, Planning Commission members
shall be appointed to their customary scheduled terms to
commence on the first day of July of odd-numbered years."
Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Option IV
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
December 18, 1996
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY':
Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH SPEED
LIMITS OF 55 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO
ARROW ROUTE, 50 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE
TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM 1-15 TO
ETIWANDA AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMIT
TO HAVEN AVENUE, 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO
MILLIKEN AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE
TO 1-15, AND 50 MPH ON ARROW ROUTE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO
EAST CITY LIMIT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide for speed limits
of 55 mph on Etiwanda Avenue from 4th Street to Arrow Route, 50 mph on Etiwanda Avenue from
Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard, 55 mph on 4th Street from I-15 to Etiwanda Avenue, 50 mph
on 4th Street from West City Limit to Haven Avenue, 55 mph on 4th Street from Haven Avenue to
Milliken Avenue, 50 mph on 4th Street from Milliken Avenue to I-15 and 50 mph on Arrow Route
from Haven Avenue to East City Limit. This will complete the posting of streets otherwise subject
to the 65 mph maximum in 1997.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The above listed sections of multi-lane City streets have remained unposted as to speed limits due
to width and relatively light traffic volumes. Last year, Senate Bill 848 eliminated the state
maximum 55 mph speed limit on such unposted streets and established a new maximum of 65 mph.
This new maximum becomes effective January 1, 1997 unless speed limits are established by cities
in accordance with the California Vehicle Code.
Sections 22357 and 22358 of the Vehicle Code allow cities to set speed limits in accordance with
Specific Engineering Surveys in order to more precisely establish the "Reasonable and Prudent"
speed requirements under the basic speed law which would otherwise apply to unposted streets. This
speed then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise
could occur. Such a survey, less than five years old, is particularly important where radar is used
for enforcement. Recent court decisions have rendered arbitrarily set speed limits invalid when
J
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SPEED LIMITS
December 18, 1996
Page 2
enforcement is by radar.
Surveys as required by the Vehicle Code have been conducted on the above listed sections of City
streets. The surveys involved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by using
radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to
drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of the surveys are shown on the attached
summaries and show the majority of cars are being driven in conformance with the recommended
speed limits. California speed law is based on the legislature's belief that the majority of drivers
respond in a safe and reasonable manner to conditions around them. This is why prevailing speeds
are such an important factor in determining a reasonable speed limit.
The surveys also found no conditions not readily apparent to drivers which would be a factor in
further reducing the speed limit. The safety records of the streets are also very good.
CONCLUSION
A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on
a street and still provide for effective enforcement. In the absence of high accident rates, a speed
limit such as this should be set at the first 5 mph increment below the speed below which 85% of
the drivers are going. With very few exceptions these are the speed limits proposed in this report.
The proposed limits should provide a fair and ~ffective tool for enforcement considering the
circumstances under which they will be enforced.
Respectfully submitted,
'l
City Engineer
WJO:PAR:Is
o ~ ~ o
Z r,
ORDINANCE NO. 5 ~ ~
AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN CITY STREETS
A. Recitals.
(i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council may, by
ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway.
(ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain
streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this
Ordinance.
(iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below,
are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City, Code to read, in words
and figures, as follows:
10.20.020 Decrease of State Law' Maximum Speed. It is determined by City Council
resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed
permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist
upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this
section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section ~vhen signs are erected
giving notice hereof:
Ordinance
Page 2
Name of Street or Portion Affected
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Archibald Avenue - Banyan Street to north end
Archibald Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street
Arrow Route - Baker Avenue to Haven Avenue
Arrow Route - Haven Avenue to East City Limits
Baker Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd.
Bm~yan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue
Banyan Street - Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue
Bm~yan Street from west City limits to Beryl Street
Base Line Road - west City limits to Carnelian Street
Base Line Road - Carnelian Street to Hermosa Avenue
Base Line Road - Hermosa Avenue to Spruce Avenue
Base Line Road - Spruce Avenue to east City limit
Beryl Street ~ Banyan Street to end
Beryl Street - 800' n/o Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street
Canistel Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Antietam Drive
Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to end
Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street
Church Street - Pepper Street to Haven Avenue
Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue
Church Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue
East Avenue - Base Line Road to Highland Avenue
8th Street - Grove Avenue to Haven Avenue
Etiwanda Avenue - 4th Street to Arrow Route
Etiwanda Avenue - Arrow Route to Foothill BIrd.
Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to 24th Street
Fairmont Drive - Highland Avenue to Milliken Avenue
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit (MPH)
50
45
45
50
35
35
45
40
45
40
45
50
45
40
35
45
40
40
40
45
45
45
55
50
45
35
Ordinance
Page 3
Name of Street or Portion Affected
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit (MPH)
Fairmont Drive - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 35
4th Street - West City Limit to Haven Avenue 50
4th Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue 55
4th Street - Milliken Avenue to I-15 50
4th Street - I-15 to Etiwanda Avenue 55
Fredricksburg Avenue - Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive 35
Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. 40
Haven Avenue - 4th Street to Hillside Road 45
Hellman Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Loma Drive 35
Hellman Avenue - 500' rdo Manzanita Drive to Valley View 40
Hellman Avenue - 6th Street to Foothill Blvd. 45
Hermosa Avenue - Base Line Road to Wilson Avenue 45
Hermosa Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Sun Valley Drive 40
Hermosa Avenue - 8th Street to Base Line Road 45
Highland Avenue - Sapphire Street to Carnelian Street 40
Highland Avenue - Amethyst Street to Hermosa Avenue 35
Highland Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to 800' w/o Haven Ave. 45
Hillside Road - Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 35
Hillside Road - Amethyst Street to Haven Avenue 40
Hillside Road - Haven Avenue to Canistel Avenue 35
Hillview Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
Kenyon Way - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 35
Lark Drive - Kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue 35
Lemon Avenue - Jasper Street to Beryl Street 35
Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40
Lemon Avenue - Haven Avenue to Highland Avenue 40
Manzanita Drive - Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue 35
Ordinance
Page 4
Declared Prima Facie
Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH)
54. Milliken Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street 50
55. Morning Place/Vintage Drive - Banyan Street to Milliken Ave. 35
56. Mountain View Drive - Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue 40
57. Netherlands View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
58. 9th Street - Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue 40
59. Red Hill Country Club Drive - Foothill Blvd. To Alta Cuesta 35
60. Rochester Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40
61. Rochester Avenue - Base Line Road to Banyan Street 45
62. San Bernardino Road - Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35
63. Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end 45
64. Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Lemon Avenue 40
65. 7th Street - Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 45
66. Sierra Crest View Loop o Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
67. Spruce Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40
68. 6th Street - West City limits to Archibald Avenue 45
69. Summit Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 45
70. Terrace View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
71. Terra Vista Parkway - Church Street to Milliken Avenue 40
72. Victoria Street - Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue 35
73. Victoria Street - Etiwanda Avenue to Route 15 40
74. Victoria Street - Haven Avenue to Mendocino Place 40
75. Victoria Park Lane - Fairmont Way to Base Line Road 35
76. Victoria Windrows Loop (north and south) 35
77. Vineyard Avenue - Church Street to Base Line Road 40
78. Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Carnelian Avenue 45
79. Vintage Drive - Milliken Avenue to east end 35
80. Whittram Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to east City limits 40
Ordinance
Page 5
Name of Street or Portion Affected
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit (MPH)
81. Wilson Avenue - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue 45
82. Wilson Avenue - Haven Avenue to 200' e/o Canistel Avenue 40
(Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124)
(i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which
are more than reasonable or safe; and
(ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate
facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe
on said streets or portions thereof; and
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on
said streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs
upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein.
SECTION 2.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published
as required by law.
SECTION 3.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within
fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this th day of January, 1997.
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
William J. Alexander, Mayor
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Memorandum
City Manager's Office
,u uO
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
December 12, 1996
CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES
Attached is a brief description of the Committees, Subcommittees, Commissions, and Ad Hoc
Task Forces of the City Council and the designated Delegate and Altemate(s). Historically, the
City Council reviews these committees and assignments after each Council election to determine
any changes are desired. The City Council may also wish to review this listing and consider
dissolving those committees which the Council feels are no longer necessary.
Updates and additions to and coordination of the City Council Committees, Subcommittees,
Commissions, and Ad Hoc Task Forces is done through the City Manager's office. Also
attached for your review is the Current City Council Assignments.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jack Lam, AICP
City Manager
Attachments:
Description of Committees, Subcommittees, Commissions, and Ad Hoc Task
Forces as Designated December 21, 1994.
List of Current City Council Assignments
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
As Desianated from December 21, 1994 City Council Meetina
The following is a brief synopsis of each of the Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions.
BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALITION (CLOUT)
Provides a program of ac'don for the public and private sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area-wide
importance.
Meets the fourth Thursday of each month, 7:30 a.m., Ontario Marriott Hotel
DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams
CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE
The City Seleclion Committee is made up of all of the Mayors for San Bernardino County and its purpose is to
select elected representalk, es to various bodies which include: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
and the Air Quality Management District. The regular meeting of the committee is held on the last working day
of April of every even numbered year at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino in conjunction with
SANBAG agenda business staffing at 9:30 a.m.
Mayor is Representative
AB 939 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE
This is a state mandated task force created by San Bernardino County and is made up of the Board of
Supervisors, elected representatives from each City within San Bernardino County and 10 non-elected
representatives. The purpose of the task force is to coordinate the development of the County and Citys
Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and to coordinate a cost effective regional solid waste management
system.
Meets on a Quarterly Basis; the Third Thursday of Each Month from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Fisk Auditorium
of the San Bernardino County Museum.
DELEGATE: Biane
ALTERNATE: Alexander
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE
Provides liaison with the South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality issues.
Meets as Needed at the AQMD Headquarters in Diamond Bar
DELEGATE: Gutierrez ALTERNATE: Alexander
CABLE TELEVISION SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the cable television franchises and to develop the public access portion of the franchise
agreement.
Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Biane
City Council, Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as designated from
December 21, 1994
Page 2
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE
Provides liaison between the Chamber of Commerce and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating
projects and items of mutual interest.
Meets Second Wednesday of Each Month at the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber office
DELEGATE: Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE
Monitors the activities of the Foundation and items of mutual interest.
Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Gutierrez
FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Reviews employment eligibility lists prior to certification and other related personnel matters.
Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center in accordance with Fire Department Rules and
Regulations
DELEGATES: Alexander and Biane
HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE
Reviews affordable housing needs and develops strategy and programs for agency set-aside money.
Meets first Tuesday of February at 8:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Alexander and Gutierrez
INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
The Inland Empire League is one of fifteen divisions within the League of California Cities and functions as an
"arm" of cities. The League also provides training, legislative tracking, and research for associate cities.
Meets monthly and/or quarterly as needed; location changes each month
DELEGATE: Curatalo ALTERNATE: Williams
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ECONOMIC, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING
SUBCOMMITTEE
Reviews and discusses statewide policy and legislation affecting these topics.
Meets quarterly on the 2nd Friday of the month; location changes
DELEGATE: Biane
City Council Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 21, 1994
Page 3
LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides a liaison on library issues.
Meets the first Tuesday of February at 9:00 a.m. and as needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center.
DELEGATES: Williams and Alexander.
MOBILE HOME ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the Citys Mobile Home Accord and contract nego~ations. The Accord is a contract between
the owners of the City's mobile home parks and the City and addresses rent stabilization for the mobile home
parks.
Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:00 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Alexander and Biane ALTERNATE: Gutierrez
OMNITRANS
OMNITRANS is a Joint Powers Agreement which coordinates the busing needs of its associate cities.
Meets the first Wednesday of each month at Omnitrans Headquarters in San Bernardino at 8:00 a.m.
DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the construction of park and recreation facilities and items of mutual concern.
Meets first and third Wednesdays at 5:00 p.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams
PUBLIC SAFETY SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides a liaison for public safety issues.
Meets the first Tuesday of February at 10:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Curatalo
PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for public works projects throughout the City. (Law Enforcement Subcommittee combined with
this subcommittee.)
Meets first Tuesday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Biane
City Council, Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as designated from
December 21, 1994
Page 4
REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE
Provides liaison for the marketing of the City and reviews agency marketing budget. (Regional Mall
Subcommittee combined with this subcommittee.)
Meets first Tuesday of February at 9:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
DELEGATES: Williams and Biane
ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE
Created August 3, 1994 in response to residents' desire for input into the Route 30 Corridor.
Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Tri-
Communities Conference Room.
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo
ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR DESIGN JPA
Created January 19, 1994 to address Route 30 Corridor concerns for both San Bernardino and Los Angeles
Counties.
Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m., meeting site rotates.
DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo ALTERNATE: Alexander
SAN BAG
SANBAG is the regional planning authority of which the City participates in through a Joint Powers Agreement.
Meets the first Wednesday of each month at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino at 9:30 a.m.
DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams
SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - REGIONAL COUNCIL
SCAG is an association of County and City governments and is a Council of Governments (COG). The purpose
of such councils is to provide a forum where members can reach agreement on issues of common concern
and develop regional planning approaches.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month, and Annual meeting held in March of each year; location changes
(the last two years meetings were held in Brea)
DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Biane
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - SOLID WASTE SUBCOMMITTEE
Discussions regional solid waste issues.
Meets 1 st Tuesday of the month; location changes.
DELEGATE: Biane
City Council Committees, Subcommittees
and Commissions as Designated from
December 21, 1994
Page 5
SOUTHERN CLAIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)
DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
Discusses regional community and economic development policy.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month; location changes.
DELEGATE: Alexander
- COMMUNITY
& ECONOMIC
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
The Council Subcommittees for these Commissions conduct the interviews for the expired terms and vacancies
as they occur and provide liaison for items of mutual interest.
Park & Recreation
PlanninglHPC
DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams
DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Biane
COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
December 21, 1994
Alexander
Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT)
City Selection Committee
Fire Distdct Personnel Committee
Housing Set Aside Subcommittee
Library Subcommittee
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
Omnitrans
Park and Recreation Commission
Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee
Rt 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
SAN BAG
SCAG Regional Council
SCAG Community & Economic Development Subcommittee
AB939 Solid Waste Task Force
Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Alternate
Biane
AB939 Solid Waste Task Force
Cable Television Subcommittee
Fire Distdct Personnel Committee
League of California Cities Economic, Comm Dev & Hsg Subcom
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
Planning/Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee
Public Works Subcommittee
Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee
SCAG Solid Waste Subcommittee
SCAG-Regional Council
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Curatalo
Inland Empire League of California Cities
Public Safety Subcommittee
Rt 30 Corddor Design Authority
Chamber of Commerce Representative
Rt 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Alternate
COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
December 24, 1994
Gutierrez
Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee
Cable Television Subcommittee
Community Foundation Subcommittee
Housing Set Aside Subcommittee
Planning/Historic Preservation Subcommittee
Public Safety Subcommittee
Public Works Subcommittee
Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Williams
Chamber of Commerce Representative
Community Foundation Subcommittee
Library Subcommittee
Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee
Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee
Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee
Rt 30 Ad Hoc Task Force
Rt 30 Corddor Design Authority
Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT)
Omnitrans
SAN BAG
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
DELEGATE
Alternate
Alternate
Alternate
h :~lata\forms\ccsu bcom. 95
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
REFORMATION OF A CENTRAL PARK TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council select one of the recommended options for the reformation of a
Central Park Task Force.
BACKGROUND
The previous design development process was community driven with several focus committees composed
of community members who gave of their time and expertise to provide valuable insight into the cultural
and recreational needs of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. All design decisions for Central Park were
made with the assistance of City staff, under the direction of the C ity's Park and Recreation Commission,
Planning Conunission, and City Council.
ANALYSIS
Per the Council's request, staff is providing information regarding the reformation of a Central Park Task
Force. Staff Suggests that there are 2 basic options available to the Council.
Reactivate the original task force (or as many members as possible), see attached list, and add
additional residents to balance the make-up of the committee to review the project in a manner
consistent with the procedures list in option 2.
Form a totally new task force to review the project. Staff recommends that the previous format
used to establish Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Committee be utilized to determine the members
of this committee. This process includes advertising for members in the local newspaper, grouping
the applications based on affiliation and geographic location, interviews of the applicants by the
core group, and recommendation of the applicants to the Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-
Committee with final selection approved by the full Council.
Respectfully itted,
Ri~ G ~ez
Co: pment
Director
RG~dlw
Attachments
ORIGINAL TASK FORCE MEMBERS
Jim Bailey
Ron Bishop
Andrea Blair
Bob Bradley
Steve Butters
Joe DiIorio
Bob Dutton
Jim Frost
Denise Garland
Margi Goldstein
Norm Guith
Beck Hardy
John Melcher
Sandie Oerly
Diane Williams
Linda Yount
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council -
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember "~ " "
DISCUSSION OF DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS
When the City Council is asked to make decisions on requests from persons or organizations, any
financial or campaign contributions made by these entities to any Councilmember should be
disclosed. It is in the interest of the City for all Councilmembers, as well as the public, to be made
aware of these contributions.
I am asking this Council to direct staff to draft a policy requiring each Councilmember to disclose
at Council meetings, all campaign contributions exceeding $1,000 from any person or organization
seeking City approval on any item pending or approved within the past year.
rVC/dja
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer '
10114 WILSON AVENUE - MR. HUMBERTO ZARATE
Araceli Zarate, owner of a two acre parcel located at the northeast comer of Wilson Avenue and
Hermosa Avenue (address, 10114 Wilson Avenue), applied for a building permit to add 2,565 square
feet of living space and 975 square feet of garage to their existing house. The total area of the home
after completion will be 5,457 square feet.
City code requires completion of Full frontage improvements for any building permits issued for the
property. These improvements to the frontage of Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue are
approximately 600 feet in length and are estimated to cost $86,000.00. Staff pointed out to Mr.
Zarate the code conditions. It should be noted the code has an exception for additions of 650 square
feet or less. Obviously, Araceli Zarate's addition is far in excess of that and in fact is much larger
than the home currently on the lot. It does appear the existing home may have to be gutted to
accomplish the new work. It should also be noted, others in the neighborhood have complied with
the code conditions.
Mr. Humberto Zarate was before the City Council at the meeting of December 4, 1996, under public
comments. Engineering staff met with Mr. Zarate and reviewed the situation in further detail. As
a compromise, staff suggested the two acre parcel be subdivided into three lots. This would reduce
the frontage improvements required of the building permit. However, the new lot encompassing his
proposed permit would still have a majority of the frontage improvements to install. The estimate
of these frontage improvements is $60,000.00. If Mr. Zarate decides to process a subdivision map,
he can realize a savings of $26,000.00 on the frontage improvements. However, map processing fees
and Engineering cost to prepare the map would cost about $9,000.00. So his savings could be
$17,000.00.
Mr. Zarate has been informed of code requirements. He is aware staff has given every thought to
his situation. He is still expressing his concerns that processing a subdivision and installing
$60,000.00 of frontage improvements is too excessive for him.
RG:WJO:dlw
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 18, 1996
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J.
O'Neil, City Engineer
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 18, 1996 ITEM D-17, APPROVAL
TO RELEASE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND LABOR AND
MATERIAL BOND (RAILROAD CROSSINGS) FOR PARCEL MAP
NO. 12959-1 (CAPELLINO BROTHERS).
Please remove above said item D-17 from the City Council Agenda for December 18, 1996. A water
easement is needed to complete this project. The bonds will be held until such time the water
easement is received.
WJO:dlw
Good Evening Mr. Mayor and Council Members:
I have a prepared statement I'd like to read, I hope you'll bear with me ....
Three years ago the citizens of this community were led to believe that the
cit3, was in serious financial trouble. We were told the State was going to
take away millions of dollars in property tax revenue and so, in order to
maintain "vital" services, it was necessary to enact a Utility Tax--to bridge
this so-called financial gap ....
Well, as the), say, that was then and this is now--and after having done
some research into our city's recent financial statements I have a few items
I'd like to share with the ci~, council. Please bear in mind that all the
numbers I've referenced here were taken directly from the city's financial
statements.
I wonder .... how many of you are aware that the city's General Fund
grew by over 200°/6 between fiscal years 1990 and 1995 ($9.2 M vs 28.3 M)?
This impressive increase in the relative wealth of our General Fund
represents an annualized growth rate of 33% per year.
How, may I ask, does this "amazing" growth relate to the dire picture
that was painted by our city. manager when the Utility Tax was enacted?
It seems to me that our General Fund is growing faster and fatter than
the Nutty Professor...!
The General Fund's growth is directly attributable to the exceptional
growth in city revenues. I'm sure the council is aware that our city's "Total
Revenues" grew by 80°/6 between 1990 to 1995, ($19.3 M vs $33.4 M). And
I'm certain you're aware that expenditures over this same period decreased
by 5.5% ($26.8 M vs $25.3 M).
Plainly, what is happening here is that the city is taking in more
revenue than it actually needs to cover its annual operational expenditures.
This city is, in effect, creating a huge General Fund "surplus" b>;
continuing to collect tax revenues it has no claim on.
A "surplus," by the way, represents the amount by which the cit3,'s
revenues (for any given year) exceed its expenditures.
Let me give you some examples: the average annual General Fund
"surplus" for the sLx years from 1990 to 1995 was $1.9 M; the average
annual surplus for the four years from 1992 to 1995 was $5.2 M; and the
average annual surplus for 1994 and 1995 was $6.1 M.
Even in 1993 (the year BEFORE the city began collecting Utility Taxes)
the city managed to generate a healthy $5.8 M surplus. Not too bad for a
city supposedly on the verge of a fiscal calamity.
In 1994 and 1995 the city posted a combined two-year surplus of
$12.3 M. In those same two years the city collected $11.3 M in Utility Taxes.
So, it would appear that ALL the Utility Taxes collected in the first two years
went directly into the General Fund surplus.
It's also interesting to note that even without one penny of Utility Tax
revenue the city would have posted a two-year surplus of about $1,000,000
for 1994 & 1995.
So, excuse me for asking. but where was the financial crisis???
And what about our greedy State Government and its property tax
"take-away"? Well, in comparing the property taxes collected by the city in
1993, '94 and '95 to the $2.6 M it collected in 1992 (the largest mount
collected between 1990 & 1995 ) the city shows a thrc. c.-year combined loss
in property tax revenue of $1.9 M--which represents about 17% of what's
been collected in Utility Taxes.
Said another way, the city has collected about six times as much Utility
Tax revenue as it's lost in State "take-aways"-and that's just in the first two
years of collecting the Utility Tax.
So, how many times over are we taxpayers going to have to pay you
back for the two million bucks the State took away?
You do recall, don't you?, that covering the State propert3, tax "take-
away" was THE reason the Utility Tax was enacted.7 So, why are we still paying this tax?
And I'm sorry, but I do not believe for one minute that this council will
ever allow the U/Tax to be "phased-out."
Your phase-out scheme is dependent on the continued growth in Sales
Tax Revenue and as soon as there's a turn-down in retail sales, you'll
suspend the phase-out. And, of course, with the Ontario Mills now in the
picture, it's safe to say that city Sales Tax revenues will be dropping in the
near future. So, we taxpayers will soon be kissing that tax "phase-out" plan
good-bye--along with millions more of our hard-earned money.
It's obvious, judging by the huge surpluses being generated by the
Utility Tax, that this city is getting RICH at its citizen's expense. We were
told three years ago that the Utility. Tax was necessary for the city's financial
survival--what was simply untrue back then, has now become an obvious lie.
Could it be that this city council simply doesn't understand the reality
of our city's robust financial position. OR, could it be that you are simply too
greedy to care about how much we taxpayers are being gouged by your
Utility Tax?
Well .... one thing is now certain. you'll no longer be able to claim that
you were simply ignorant...of the financial facts.
Regarding the legal status of this tax, I suggest you suspend the tax
immediately-trust me, this cit3.' doesn't need the tax revenue--and let the
voters decide the matter in 1998.
Thank you for your time.
II
il
|l
II
(nJ ~: II
r- ~!~ II
II
II
II
II
II
II
d'~ II
d'~ II
e-- II
11
II
~) II
u'~ II
(::::) ~ II
II
C',J II
(J3. II
II
~' II
II
~.n II A
I',- II
~ II
"-' II
II
I1
II
· "' II
Cn II
II
~' II
~ II
'-.-' ~1
II
II
II
"" II
4:~ II
I1
Cl:) II
(~e-) II
~.J II
~ II
v II
II
II
(::) It
(~ II
~' II
I~ II
II
~ 11
~ II
,.- II
~ II
v II
II
,'-'
X
N II ~ II
f,'l II I'-- II
II ~ II
¢'~ II ~ II
f""' II ~ II
~ II ¢~ II
"" II II
II II
u'l N
N ~
,-.-.
0 Ln
CO
N N
x
v
L~
LI, I
II 0 II
II ff} II
tl II
II rf} II
II ~ II
II ~:~ II
I1 ~/~ II
II II
II II
N
II C'f} II
II O'~ II
II II
Ln
II
II , II
II P II
II ,-- II
II ~ II
II II
II ~ II
II 0 II
" d is
II II
II Lf} II
II ~' II
II '-- II
II ~ II
II II
11 ,-- II
II C'~ II
II II
II ~ II
II eq II
II ~ II
II l!
II rf} II
II I~- II
fi
II c,~ It
II
II , II
II CO II
II N II
II ~ II
II II
Mayor Alexander
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Mayor Alexander,
Thank you for your interest in the material I presented to the
city council at last Wednesday's meeting. As you requested, I have
enclosed a copy of my presentation.
I realize that we probably have irreconcilable positions on the
Utility Tax issue, however, I'd be happy to sit down with you to
discuss the methodology I used to develop the material I presented
to the council.
I'd like to mention two brief points, for your consideration, that
typify the problems I have with the manner in which this city (and
the city council) has handled the Utility Tax issue.
At the end of fiscal year 1995 the city recorded (per its audited
financial statements) "Excess Revenues Over Expenditures" of
$8,116,402. During this same year the city collected $6,460,638 in
Utility Taxes. So, even without any Utility Tax revenue for 1995, the
city would still have ended the year with "Excess Revenues Over
Expenditures" (or, a surplus) of 51,655,764.
As far as I'm concerned it is absolutely irrefutable that all of
the Utility Taxes collected in 1995 went into the General Fund
surplus.
At the council meeting you took issue with my statement
regarding how much proper~: tax revenue the State had taken away.
Your indication to me was that the amount I presented as "lost"
property taxes was incorrect--I assumed you meant my $1.9 million
figure was too low.
I've enclosed a worksheet to show you exactly how I
determined the amount of properr3,' taxes that have been "lost" to the
city, as of the end of fiscal year 1995. The numbers I used in
calculating this amount came directly from the city's financial
statements. If you, and/or the city manager have numbers which
differ from those presented in the city's financial statements, I would
certainly be interested in seeing them.
As you can see from my worksheet, property taxes were on the
rise between 1990 and 1992. In fact, 1992 was the high point for
property tax revenues during this six year period. The following
three years (1993, '94 & '95) show declining property tax revenues--
which I took to represent the dreaded State "take-aways."
Using 1992 as my (peak benchmark) base year, I simply
determined how much each of these three years (1993, '94 & '95)
declined, by comparing them to the base year, 1992. As shown on
the worksheet, the combined total "lost" property tax revenues for
the years 1993, '94, and '95 is $1,920,490. A rather smallish number
when compared to the $11,336,588 of Utility Taxes collected by the
city in 1994 & 1995.
In broader terms, I also have a problem with the impertinence
with which city hall has ignored the original premise under which
the Utility Tax was presented to the community. This is what I call
city hall's deception factor.
CiW hall originally told us that covering State "take-aways"
(approximately $8 million) was the only reason the Utility Tax was
needed. This claim has proven to be false and totally unsupported
by recent financial data.
And, of course, city hall was, from the very beginning, freely
playing the fear card--a card, I might add, that you played as
recently as last weeks council meeting!--with ham-handed threats of
losing "essential ciW services," such as police and fire, if city hall
didn't get the Utility Tax enacted.
It's painfully obvious, however, given the huge surpluses the
ciW is now ra'king in, that any claim of vital services being lost
without the Utility Tax smacks of nothing more than blatant
demagoguery.
And now, I would guess, your ciW manager has whispered in
your ear that the ciW has sufficient funds (did he call it an "adequate
revenue stream," or just a "surplus"?) to undertake the "Central Park"
project--so, the tax that was levied only to stave off State induced
financial calamiW is now going to generate the money you need to
build Central Park, the "cornerstone" of your mayoral legacy.
You gave a nice-sounding speech at the council meeting about
those terrible politicians in Sacramento and Washington, who
continually do bad things--things that rile up us voters, who, in turn,
foolishly make the mistake of taking it out on you nice folks working
in local politics.
Well, there's just one problem with your "don't blame us"
speech--it missed its mark. As I'm sure you know, all the political
games get their start at the local level. The people who end up in
Sacramento and Washington learn the art of political deception in
their home towns; where they sit on School Boards, or Water
Districts, and, yes, ciW councils. That's where they practice the game
of saying and doing whatever it takes to get themselves elected (or
re-elected). And if it means deceiving the taxpayers a little, well,
they can simply claim they didn't 'know, or that they did it for the
good of the city.
As far as I'm concerned what you're doing to the taxpayer's
here in Rancho Cucamonga is no different than what gets done to us
in Sacramento and Washington. You're taking our money under
misleading (if not false!) pretenses and using it for your own political
gains or your self-aggrandizement.
You, the city council, and the city manager are, as far as I can
tell, purposely deceiving the taxpayers of this community about the
tremendous amount of money being pulled in by the Utility Tax.
Money that is being expropriated under a suspect tax for purposes
and projects the tax was not enacted to support.
If building Central Park is the real issue for you and city hall,
then tell your constituents that the State "take-aways" didn't turn
out to be as bad as you thought and that you'd now like to build
them a grand and glorious park. You could accomplish this by
eliminating the Utility Tax and then letting the voters decide
whether or not they want to pay a Central Park tax.
I am not foolish enough to believe that this will ever happen.
However, I am foolish enough to ask you to stop this terrible
financial deception being perpetrated on the taxpayers of this city.
10757 Lemon Ave. #1425
Alta Loma, Ca 91737
cc: Council members -
Willjams
Biane
Gutierrez
Curatalo