The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997/01/15 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. January 15, 1997 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Lam, Ci(y Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda January 15, 1997 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the ~week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo Gutierr~;z , and Williams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of check from DARE Fund Raiser by Rotary Club. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda, The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: November 20, 1996 December 4, 1996 (special meeting) December 4, 1996 December 11, 1996 (Curatalo absent) January 1,1997 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos.12/11/96, 12/18/96 and 12/24/96; and Payroll ending 12/24/96, for the total amount of $1,325,719.11. Approval of an order to vacate service vehicle turnaround on the northeast corner of Lot 1 of Tract 13566-2 generally located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Cherry Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 97-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED THE SERVICE VEHICLE TURNAROUND ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF TRACT 13566-2, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF CHERRY AVENUE 17 City Council Agenda January 15, 1997 2 , Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 97-001 ) for Assessment Engineering for Park and Recreation District No. PD-85 to NBS Public Resource Group in the amount of $13,500.00 to be funded from Fund No. 90-4130-6028, to accomplish a property owner election, as set forth in Proposition 218. Approval of Renewal Agreement with Citrus Little League for Snack Bar and Field Use. Approval to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Community Center Development Fee Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency (CO RA96-010), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 96-052) and Foothills Vineyards Center, which adds the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (CO FD97-004). Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond, and File a Notice of Completion for CUP 94-03, located at 9551 Lucas Ranch Road. Release: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Materials Bond $19,500.00 $9,750.00 RESOLUTION NO. 97-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP Ok~-0~~ LOCATED AT 9551 LUCAS RANCH ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 19 19-A 20 21 22 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS ORDINANCE NO. 567 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION 23 City Council Agenda January 15, 1997 3 CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH SPEED LIMITS OF 55 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE, 50 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM I-15 TO ETIWANDA AVENUE. 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO HAVEN AVENUE. 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO 1-15. AND 50 MPH ON ARROW ROUTE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT ORDINANCE NO. 568 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS 24 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF VACATING AGATE STREET AND DISPOSING OF CITY OWNER PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C" OF TRACT 6846, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN HAMILTON AND MIGNONETTE STREETS RESOLUTION NO. 97-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AGATE STREET AND THE DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C" OF TRACT 6846 29 43 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. City Council Agenda January 15, 1997 CONSIDERATION OF PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE NAMING OF THE NEW RECREATION ACTIVITY CENTER (OLD GEMCO BUILDING) 50 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. DISCUSSION OF RECENT COURT DECISION AND THE CITY OF HIGHLAND'S APPROACH TO RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATIONS (Continued from September 18, 1996 meeting) DISCUSSION OF FORMING TASK FORCE TO REVIEW CENTRAL PARK (Continued from December 18, 1996 meeting) DISCUSSION OF THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL INFORMATIONAL SIGNS ON POLES (Oral) 51 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; VALLEY BASEBALL AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 9, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours pdor to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. November 20, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.~ular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 20, 1996 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Cathy Wahlstron, RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Aubrey Campbell stated everyone has been working a long time to resolve the day laborer problem near Arrow and Grove. He stated he is afraid for his life and felt the people picking up the laborers should be fined. He felt there should be a law to protect him. Mayor Alexander suggested this be agendized for the next meeting to discuss or suggested the Public Safety Subcommittee of Councilmembers Gutierrez and Curatalo further discuss this. Councilmember Gutierrez stated the Public Safety Subcommittee could meet on this issue and then it could come back to the full Council at the December 4 meeting. C2. Bob Lundy, Executive Director, Rancho Cucamonga Visitors Bureau, stated he was present to introduce Bruce Davis who also works at the Visitors Bureau, and to inform the Council that they are redudng their hours of operal~on there. He also referred to a tax he had received from Australia from the Old West Frontier Company which is on file in the City Clerk's office. He commented that the Jack Benny statue is still not very accessible. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 2 Bruce Davis, 12914 Tiburon Drive, Victorville 92392, and also works at the Visitors Center, told about his working experiences at the Center. He also commented they are on reduced hours and the comments they have been receiving from people that have previously stopped when the Center was not open. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he felt the Council did want them to have a successful center although he felt the Council did not have all the answers at the present time. He stated he is willing to help them find answers and that he would be willing to meet with the people from the Visitors Center to try to work out something so they could be opened more. C3. Jane Bradshaw, member of C-Car and the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force, wanted to thank the Council for all of their support and help as it relates to item H1. She stated she especially wanted to thank Councilmember Williams for taking a leadership role in getting things accomplished. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is supplemental information for item D10 which indicates the results from the bid opening held today. D1. Approval of Minutes: October 16, 1996 (Curatalo absent) D2. Approval of Warrants. Register Nos. 10/23/96, 10/30/96 and 11/06/96; and Payroll ending 10/31/96 for the total amount of $2,929,066.21. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 1996. D4. Approval to authorize the advertisement of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Traffic Signals and Street Improvements at Base Line Road and East Avenue Improvement Project, to be funded from Fund 12, TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4637-9203. RESOLUTION NO. 96-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 12, TDA ARTICLE 8 D5. Approval of application for Grant Funds from the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Corddor Beauti~cation Project and the Don Tapia Trailhead Facility. RESOLUTION NO. 96-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS: METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND TAPIA TRAILHEAD FACILITY City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 3 D6. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street, Storm Drain, and Railroad Crossing Improvements from 450 feet south to 250 feet north of 8th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 96-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET, STORM DRAIN, AND RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS D7. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities, Memorandum of Understanding Agreement for Tract 13566 and Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 8 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract 13566-2 and 13566, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Cherry Avenue, in the low density residential district, submitted by TMP Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 96-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NOS. 13566 AND 13566- 2 RESOLUTION NO. 96-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY TMP HOMES RESOLUTION NO. 96-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACTS 13566-2 AND 13566 D8. Approval to appropriate $335,600 from Fund 01 (General Fund Reserve for Integrated Waste Management), and approval to appropriate from the Unreserved Fund Balance $50,000 from Fund 13 (Recreation Fund), $25,000 from Fund 14 (Air Quality Improvement Grant Fund), $46,870 from Fund 20 (Park Development), $130,000 from Fund 21 (Beauti~cation Fund), and approval to appropriate an additional $200,000 from Fund 20 (Park Development) based on revenues reflected in the adopted Fiscal Year 1996/97 Budget, for the Renovation of the Lions East Community Center, and approval to award a contract to Old Hickory Construction, Inc. (CO 96-054) in the amount of $854,000 (plus a 10% contingency). D9. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 96-055) with IWA Engineers to provide a Program Development Plan in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act for the City Parks/Recreational Facilrdes and Access Ramps, Sidewalks and Driveways in public rights-of-way and approval to appropriate $9,700 from Fund 40 - LMD 1 (Account No. 40-4130-9320), $29,680 from Fund 41 - LMD 2 (Account 41-4130-9320), $14,600 from Fund 43 - LMD 4 (Account 43-4130-9320), $18,00 from Fund 90 - PD- 85 (Account 90-4130-6028), and $21,200 from Fund 10 - Prop 111 (Fund 10) for services attributable to said agreement. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 4 D10. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO96-056) for Arrow Route Street Improvements, from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Spur to 400 feet west of Milliken Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development, Account No. 22-4637-9522 and SB-150, Account 35- 4637-9522. D11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12832, located on the proposed Day Creek Boulevard, between Highland Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by the William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 96-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12832 D12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13279, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Rochester and Milliken Avenues, submitted by the William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 96-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13279 D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14139, located on the southwest corner if Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street, submitted by Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 96-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14139 D14. Approval to Release Agreement and Secudty Deposit for Intedm Flood Control Facilities for Tract Numbers 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046, from R.C. Land Company. RESOLUTION NO. 96-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF AGREEMENT AND SECURITY DEPOSIT FOR R.C. LAND COMPANY D15. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 13890, generally located on the south side of Banyan Street, east of Haven Avenue. Release: Faithful Pedormance Bond $ 455,210.00 #B95-013091 Acce~: Main~nance Guaran~e Bond 45,521.00 #B95-013091 City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 96-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 13930, located on the west side of Hellman, south of 19th Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #985325S Maintenance Guarantee Bond #985324S Maintenance Guarantee Bond #985327S $ 29,700.00 56,400.00 19,000.00 D17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 13945, located south of Highland and east of East Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond On-Site Maintenance Guarantee Bond Highland $ 25,400.00 40,500.00 D18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 111-3313-6967 for Tract 14121, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 45,980.0 #111-331 3-6967 D19. Approval to accept the Northeast Park and East Avenue Street Improvements, Contract No. CO96-011, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount. RESOLUTION NO. 96-162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR NORTHEAST PARK AND EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 96-011, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve the recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Curatalo abstaining from voting on the October 16 minutes. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 6 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE RECOVERY OF COSTS FOR SECOND POLICE RESPONSES TO PARTIES Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this was placed on the agenda from the last meeting because more information on Prop 218 was needed to see if this Ordinance could go through. He reported that he, the City Attorney and vadous staff attended a workshop today on Prop 218, and that Mr. Markman would report on that. James Markman, City Attomey, stated he felt because of how Prop 218 is worded, they could call this a penalty instead of a fee which has been drafted into the Ordinance distributed to the Council tonight. He suggested this go back to first reading tonight because of the new content in the Ordinance. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for any public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 561. ORDINANCE NO. 561 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.32 TO TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE RECOVERY OF COSTS FOR SECOND RESPONSES BY POLICE TO PARTIES AND OTHER ASSEMBLAGES MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading for December 4, 1996. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0, E2. CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88-02 (CO 88-199) - STANDARD PACIFIC - A request to amend the termination date of the Agreement for Etiwanda Highlands (Tentative Tract 13564 and Tract 13565) for approximately 282 acres located at the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 562. ORDINANCE NO. 562 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 88-02 FOR ETIWANDA HIGHLANDS MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 562. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 7 E3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN 95-05 - MISSION LAND/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Big Box retail as a Conditionally Permitted Use on approximately 33 acres, plus a request by the City for consideration of an additional contiguous 40 acres, for a total consideration of approximately 73 acres within the Industrial Park designation (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, generally located north of Fourth Street, east of Milliken Avenue, and west of the I-15 Freeway - APN: 229-263-18 through 21,229-263-48 through 53, and 229-341-13. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 563. ORDINANCE NO. 563 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-05 AMENDING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT TO ADD WAREHOUSE-STYLE RETAIL MERCHANDISING AS A USE FOR 73 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY IN SUBAREA 12 - APN: 229-263-18 THROUGH 21,229-263-48 THROUGH 53, AND 229-341-13 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 563. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 16 REDESIGNATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A public headng on a dral~ Final EIR prepared for General Plan Amendment 95-03A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 95-04, Development Distdct Amendment 95-02, and Tentative Tract 15727 to authorize the development of 351 single family dwelling units and a neighborhood park by the reclassification of approximately 82 acres from Industrial Park to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and the consideration by the City of alternative land use and zoning designations of Office, Commerdal, Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units par acre) for the remaining 60 acres of land within the area bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west. APN: 210-062-02, 05, 06, 08, 10, 11,13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 31,32, 33, 34, and 39. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-03A - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Industrial Park to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 77 acres of land at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north, and the City will also consider an altemative designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. W~h this application the City will also consider amending the Industrial Park designation to alternative land uses forthe remaining land bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west as follows: For approximately 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Sixth street and Hellman Avenue and bordered on the west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel the City will consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-05, 06, and 39. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 8 For approximately 45 acres of land bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, and Fourth Street on the south the City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Office as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-08, 10, 11, 13, 28, 31, and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-02 - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A request to amend the Development District Map designation from Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 82 acres of land at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north, and the City will also consider an alternative designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. W~h this application the City will also consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan designation to altemative land uses for the remaining land bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west as follows: For approximately 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Sixth street and Hellman Avenue and bordered on the west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel the City will consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) or Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-05, 06, and 39. For approximately 45 acres of land bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, and Fourth Street on the south the City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial and Office as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-08, 10, 11, 13, 28, 31, and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-04 - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A request to remove 82 acres of land at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north, from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purposes of rezoning the land to Development Code Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. With this application the City will also consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 to alternative land uses and amending development standards for the remaining land bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west as follows: Removing approximately 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Hellman Avenue and bordered on the west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purposes of rezoning the land to Development Code Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) or Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-05, 06, and 39. Removing approximately 45 acres of land bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east and Fourth Street on the south from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purpose of considering Development Code Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Office as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-08, 10, 11, 13, 28, 31, and 34. 3. Consider changing the development standards and land use actMties for Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15727 CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A total residential development of 342 single family lots and a 5 acre neighborhood park on a total of 82 acres on land to be rezoned to the Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north. APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if the lot in the corner was residential - 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre? Alan Warren, Associate Planner, stated yes. Coundlmember Gutierrez inquired if it was discussed at the Planning Commission the possibility of the same type of light commercial that was proposed for the opposite corner. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, stated that was not discussed. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that was addressed in the EIR as far as the use, and that the Commission decided to go with the staff recommendation not to leave it industrial but to make it residential because it created an island of industrial surrounded by residential. Councilmember Biane asked about the economic impact, property tax generation, residential versus light industrial. He stated he realized that some of the properties would remain commercial or business park in its orientation, but wondered if there were any figures that were quantified one versus the other. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, stated the report acknowledged that the most advantageous is entirely industrial. He stated the breakdown was still a posffive for the City, but it was less than what would be expected if it were all industrial. Councilmember Williams asked in what way would this be positive to the City. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, stated it would be on the plus side of cost versus expenditure. Councilmember Williams asked if the cost for cops and extra street sweeping etc. was factored in? Alan Warren, Associate Planner, stated all the departments were contacted and their input was considered to formulate the analysis. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public headng. Addressing the City Council were: Bruce Strickland, Griffin Industries, complimented the City on its staff working with them on this project. He identified the project on the maps shown on the overhead. He explained what development was around his project. He also explained they would be enhancing the landscaping along 4th Street. He explained the park plan including its amenities and added this had been discussed with the Park and Recreation Commission. He felt the project is in the proper location and complied with the General Plan. He stated they have proposed 142 - 5,500 square foot lots, 84 - 6,000 square foot lots, and 116 - 6,500 square foot lots wilh a pdce range from $155,000 to $225,000 for the purchase of a home. He stated they agree with all of the conditions of approval except for No. 8 Engineering condition which was about the traffic signal designation. He stated they agreed with the signalization plan that is proposed, but did not feel they should have to bear the cost for it themselves. He requested a credit for the cost of the lights from the traffic fees. He stated a traffic fee is normally $1,710 per lot. He stated if you took their projected cost for the traffic signals which is approximately $168,000 to $170,000, which would put this in the $470 range of a credit, they felt they should get at least all of it or part of it to offset their cost for puffing in the signals, He stated they felt they have a well-balanced City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 10 plan for the community and that this would bdng people into the City. He asked for the Council to approve the project as recommended by the Planning Commission, Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he could not approve the project without the signals at 6th Street and that who pays for the signals would have to be resolved. Mr. Stdckland, Griffin Industries, felt the City should pay for this signal. Councilmember Willjams asked why the park would not have a soccer or ballfield. Mr. Strickland, Gdffin Industries, stated it would depend on whatever the Park and Recreation Commission approved. Councilmember Williams asked how it would work when someone buys in, would it be passed along to them the cost for the Landscape District, and how do we figure how much it is going to cost because the City is going to have to maintain them. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they would be placed in Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 1 which includes several parks in the community. Councilmember Williams asked would all of No. 1 go up if this happens to be a high intensity. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated that is a possibility. James Markman, City Attorney, stated if this goes up, you would have an election because of Prop 218. Councilmember Biane asked how close can they get to the actual numbers for the Landscape Districts. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they can get very close to the maintenance and operations on a park, especially one of this size, although the City couldn't control the water costs. Coundlmember Curatalo referred to a letter from Mr. Stagliano dated November 18 which stated they are not aware of Mr. Stdckland's needs for the exchange of property. Mr. Stdckland, Griffin Industries, referred to and presented his exchange agreement he has with Mr. Stagliano. Coundlmember Biane added that Mr. Stagllano stated in this letter that they are in favor of the concept of the project. Dean Cook stated they are the owners of 5.1 acres of land adjacent to the Griffin project at the corner of 6th and Hellman. He stated he would like to find out what the mitigation on the flood control on Hellman was because if this project does go through, he and Mr. Blessant were concerned about having to pay for the flood control improvements. He stated he felt residential has less value than commercial and stated that density is an issue for this property. He stated they would support this project if it would raise the value of his property. He stated they are concerned because he felt what went in at this location would be industrial, but would support it if it were residential if it would raise their investment up. Councilmember Gutierrez asked him when he thought they would want to build something commercial. Mr. Cook stated it would probably not be until at least the end of the decade. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 11 Councilmember asked Joe O'Neil to answer some of Mr. Cook's questions with regards to the flood control issues. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated if this project was approved, the applicant would have to do a very comprehensive storm drain master plan study and that he would be required to construct improvements which could include a master plan drain that would suffice for some of these other properties. He stated the drainage would be looked at for the entire area so that a problem is not left for any of the adjacent properties. Jeff DeBerrard, owner of 18 acres at the northeast side of the property, stated they do not support this project. He stated they did not oppose the zone change for the Griffin Development, but did have some concems. He stated in one of the EIR alternatives, it called for commercial zoning designation for the 18 acres of his property and running south. He stated they felt the commercial zone designation would be very compatible with the Griffin Development and the homes there. He added in talking with the Planning Department, they did not feel the entire parcel should be designated as commercial. He stated they felt it was a very small designation of only five acres of his property to be commercial as indicated by Alan Warren. He asked the Council to increase that designation to ten acres if they approve this project, or would like for the entire parcel to be commercial as in alternative of the EIR. He stated he was concerned about his setbacks being increased because of this residential development. He did not think he should be penalized because of this project. He stated he did not think his property s. hould have to be master planned for one development to come in on the corner. He stated he did not oppose this project, but did not want his property to be restricted because of this proposed development. Coundlmember Biane stated he agreed with Mr. DeBerrard that you would need 8 to 10 acres in neighborhoed commercial to do something. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the consultant's report as to if this could support more retail in this area indicated yes it could. The question was, was it enough to support a neighborhood commercial center, the answer was no. He stated they felt at this point in time with what they understood the market to be that the five acres was enough for this type of neighborhood commerdal they thought this project might generate. He stated if some time down the road they thought it needed to be changed, that could be a reasonable change. He continued to state the requirement of a master plan for the entire Subarea 16 was a requirement this Council supperted and put into the Industrial Spedtic Plan. He stated this would occur no matter what, that any activity on this Subarea 16 requires a master plan before anything could be built. He stated they are only applying this now to the smaller industrial park area, the same standard that was originally supported by the plan which is consistent with all other zoning areas of the City where you have filed commercial or industrial park. Mayor Alexander asked what kind of a cost factor is involved in setting up a master plan for this type of area. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there are three priories to consider when doing a master plan. One has to deal with drculation, second is drainage and the third is the component of how they all fit together. He stated master plans run with the land and are considered to be living documents. Mr. DeBerrard stated the Council was not here tonight to change the zone for the five acres from industrial park, but was only here to change the designation and approve the land use designation of the general plan to commercial use, not a zone change. He stated what they are asking for is to change his designation to ten acres so if and when they build some kind of shopping center, they will not have to come back to the Council to ask for a zone change or General Plan amendment on the addffional acreage needed for their project. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 12 Jim Frost, City Treasurer, stated he felt there were short term benefits for long term goals and did not feel this really pencilled out. He felt there were differing opinions as to how much sales tax would go to the City. He stated the EIR estimated approximately 50%, which was prior to juggling in density. He stated based on the fiscal consultant's experience they felt any upward adjustment to this figure has the potential of compromising the integrity of the fiscal analysis by inflating the City revenue projections. He realized the City needs money now, but felt they should wait for the dght development to come in. He felt the process should be questioned because of the length of time it has taken for it to get this far and the amount of money that has already been invested in this project. He mentioned Prop 218 and that it will probably be a problem as it relates to this project. He did not think the City had all of the information to go forward with this project. Margie VanNoy, her daughter Randi, and neighbor Marilyn, stated they are in favor of the development and that they have gotten signatures of people in favor of it which they submitted to the City Clerk's office. Randi VanNoy stated she would like to have a park to play ball in. Marilyn stated they would like to see more people living in their area and a park close by. Emma Hackett, Edelweiss St., stated she is concerned about the lack of park facilities in this area and about the crime rate. She also complained about people paying $150,000 to $200,000 for homes that would have to listen to airplane noise. She felt industrial would be a good use for this area and felt there were many things to consider. She felt this was a lot of houses for a small area. Kenneth Smith stated he is a homeowner north of the proposed project. He stated he did not feel a residential project south of his property would hurt his property value. He did not feel there were too many units packed in one area and stated he is in support of this project. Carla Florence stated she is against the project and pointed out the City Council had received correspondence from her indicating these reasons (on file in the City Clerk's office). She stated she is also concerned about the flood control regulations indicated in the EIR. She also brought up the gangs that are on either side of the proposed project. She stated the classrooms are really being impacted, and will be even more so if this development goes in. She felt the noise levels along the streets would increase. She stated she has read the EIR and is concerned about the information in it. Bruce Strickland, Gdffin Industries, presented closing comments on the proposed project. He asked that their project be approved. Jane Graham stated she agreed with the builder and supported the project. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Coundlmember Willjams stated the question is if this is the right project for this area. She asked how did this project get this far when there is such a philosophical difference. She stated she realizes the developer has spent a lot of money designing this project, but did not think it should have got this far along into the process. She felt the park was only being used as a carrot to make this project appealing to the neighbors. She stated the airport noise would be a problem and would get worse as time went on. She stated this is changing the General Plan and did not agree with this. She felt this was only asking for trouble by approving this project. She felt that housing is not a profit to the City, but would be a deficit. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he respects what Councilmember Williams is saying and that she has some good points, but also added he felt this project could work in that area. He stated the people he is talking to say they would use and want a park in this area. He stated if he lived there, he would like more residential to come in to increase property values. He stated he agreed with the Planning Commission. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 13 Coundlmember Biane stated he has put a lot of thought into this. He mentjoned the impacts the airport would have on this area. He stated he had thought about what would make this area better and felt more people moving in would be the answer. He also felt the park would be an asset to the area, and used Northtown as an example of an area that has gotten better because of improvements. He stated he felt this project would improve this area. Councilmember Curatalo stated he felt this is an expansion of the residences already there. He stated he agreed with the Planning Commission and supported this project. Mayor Alexander stated he felt the signals should be made part of the project conditions. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he would like to see the park go in dght away instead of waiting until the end of the project. Councilmember Curatalo stated he agreed, Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Council can decide at what point of the projecrs completion they would like this park to be built. Mr. Stdckland, Griffin Industries, stated he would put the park in at 30% build-out of the project. Councilmember Gutierrez felt it should be approved with the park being built at 30% build-out and the signal being installed. Mr. Stdckland, Gdffin Industries, stated he would like a fee credit for all of the signals. Councilmember Biane felt it would be helpful to know what other developers have been required to do and would like a history of this. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the files of Ordinance Nos. 564 and 565. RESOLUTION NO. 96-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 16 REDESIGNATION WITH A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 96-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-03A, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 92 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, AND EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-02, 05, 06, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, 33, AND 39. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 14 ORDINANCE NO. 564 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-02, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, SUBAREA 16, INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 97 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, AND EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-02, 05,06, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19,26,32,33, AND39 ORDINANCE NO. 565 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-04, TO DELETE 97 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, AND EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUBAREA 16, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-02, 05, 06, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, 33, AND 39 RESOLUTION NO. 96-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15727, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 342 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ON 82 ACRES OF LAND WITH AN APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOURTH STREET AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, BORDERED BY SIXTH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, AND 33. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution Nos. 96-163, 96-164 and 96-165, and to waive first reading and set second reading of Ordinance Nos. 564 and 565 for December 4 with the modfficaljon that the park will go in after 30% of the project receives occupancy. Mol~on carded 4-1 (Williams voted no). Item H1 was discussed at this time but the minutes will remain in agenda order. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 50 MPH ON MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO BANYAN STREET. A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM SPRUCE AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT AND A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON ROCHESTER AVENUE FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO BANYAN STREET Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 15 Engineer, who made a correction in the title of the Ordinance by stating the speed limit on Base Line from Spruce to East City limit should read ~50" instead of "40". Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 566. ORDINANCE NO. 566 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading for December 4, 1996 of Ordinance No.566. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER°S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF THE FREEWAY AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (CO 96-057) FOR PROPOSED ROUTE 30 Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Jane Bradshaw, C-Car, stated they are really happy with everything presented. Councilmember Biane thanked Joe O'Neil and the Engineering staff for all of their hard work. Councilmember Williams stated she felt Rancho Cucamonga has set the pace for this project. She stated it has been a long process, but that it wasn't over yet. Mayor Alexander thanked SAN BAG for all of their work and patience. RESOLUTION NO. 96-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FREEWAY AGREEMENT AND A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STATE ROUTE 3-0 THROUGH RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 96-156. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. A recess was taken at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:34 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 16 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF PARKING ISSUE RAISED BY TONY ESPINOZA Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmember Biane asked if there was any public education that could be done through PEG or the Grapevine about this. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated he would be happy to do beth of these things. Councilmember Williams asked if there was something on the ticket indicating an appeal process. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated yes. Councilmember Williams asked if any of the 15 people that had called to file an appeal were granted the appeal. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated they were all granted the appeal. Councilmember Williams suggested that the whole RV Ordinance be reviewed in the Grapevine including the citation process. ACTION: Report received and filed. 12. DISCUSSION OF ROLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Councilmember Gutierrez stated that now with the election over he would like something in writing from the Chairman of the Planning Commission if he will be able to work with the City Council and to make sure there are no outstanding issues. He felt the Council is owed that. He stated he would like to hear from the Chairman of the Planning Commission what his desire is to work with the Council, so there is not a situation where there is no communication. He felt a workshop is needed so that the City understands where they are going and for the General Plan to be looked at. He felt there needed to be an Economic Development Subcommittee to see where the City is going so that everyone is on the same page. He felt all of the City Council and Planning Commission needed to get together and set some direction. Councilmember Biane stated he agreed with a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council to go through the General Plan and to get information from staff on the cost to go through this process. He felt the interview process for the Planning Commission should be done on off-election years to eliminate politics getting involved. Councilmember Curatalo stated he agreed with the workshop and felt that needed to be done more often. Coundlmember Williams stated she agreed that it should be a workshop instead of just a joint meeting so that staff can come in with information to help them make decisions. She stated she agreed with Councilmember Gutierrez that there is one Planning Commissioner that needs to state if he is going to work with everyone or if there is animosity. She suggested December was a good time to have the meeting. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with the workshop idea to discuss the General Plan. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 17 Councilmember Gutjerrez reiterated that he would like to know if the Planning Commission is willing to work with the City Coundl. He also stated he liked Councilmember Biane's idea of doing the Planning Commission appointments on off-election years. ACTION: The Council suggested December 11, 5:00 p.m. to meet with the Planning Commission to discuss the General Plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, would be checking with the Planning Commission to see if this would work with their schedules. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to meet with Councilmember Curatalo as the Public Safety Subcommittee on the Day Laborer issue and then report back to the entire Council at their next meeting. J2. Coundlmember Guljerrez stated he would like to discuss at the same Subcommittee meeting if there is a way to determine if a car has been parked at a certain spot for too long a period of time. He stated he didn't know if this would require a report back to the Council, but felt the Public Safety Subcommittee should discuss this. J3. Councilmember Bane stated he would like to talk about the DeBerrard property and address the concerns he brought up earlier. James Markman, City Attomey, stated the Council can direct staff to come up with a zone change or the owners can initiate this when they come up with a project. Mayor Alexander felt the Council should go ahead and initiate the zone change because he did not feel five acres would be enough for a viable project. Councilmember Bane felt Mr. DeBerrard was correct and that it would be better to take care of this now rather than wait and have to do it later. He didn~ feel it would attract a tenant by waiting until a potential project comes up. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Primo Morales, 8210 Malvern, stated he was here to take in the meeting and was interested in the Cornerpointe project. He congratulated the Council for having the green lawn ordinance on KNX Radio. He felt the Central Park site should have something done with it soon. He added he didn't think residential housing would be a deficit to the City because it was very important. Councilmember Williams clarified that based on dollars and cents it is a deficit because the services that are required cost more than the property tax dollars bring in. She stated she agreed that the residents of the City are very important. Linda Shirley wanted to comment on the relationship between the Council and the Planning Commission and felt the two groups had a responsibility to the residents and that they should work together and get past any problems. She did not agree with the project for Cornerpointe. She did not think it was worth the money and felt the Council did a disservice to the people buying the homes. City Council Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 18 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located on Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parlies; regarding terms of payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:20 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: December 4, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A spedal meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 4, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gulierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Elaine Chin, Secretary; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEMS OF BUSINESS B1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING MUNICIPAL ELECTION RESULTS RESOLUTION NO. 96-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 96-167. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. B2. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE - Oaths of Office will be administered by the Honorable Judge Jeffrey King, San Bernardino County Superior Court. Oaths to be administered to: Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Paul Biane, Councilmember Debra J. Adams, City Clerk James C, Frost, City Treasurer City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 3 Mayor Alexander introduced Judge Jeffrey King who administered the oaths of office and presented election certificates to those listed above with the exception of James C. Frost, who could not be present. B3. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO-TEM Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has enjoyed being Mayor Pro Tem these last two years, but would at this time like to nominate Diane Williams. MOTION: Moved by Gulierrez, seconded by Alexander to appoint Diane Williams to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Cw No communication was made from the public. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn, with a reception immediately following. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: December 4, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re~lular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 4, 1996, in the Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Sen/ices Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Bo ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No communications were made from the public. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Humberto Zarate, 10114 Wilson, stated because he is handicapped, he has had to make some modilications to his home. He continued by stating the City is requiring him to put in a total of 600 feet of street improvements extending to both sides of his property, and felt he should only have to put in 200 feet of improvements extending to both sides of his property. Mayor Alexander asked for Rick Gomez to meet with him on his concerns. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he would be happy to do this and would report back to the Council. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warranls, Register Nos. 11/13/96 and 11/20/96; and Payroll ending 11/14/96 for the total amount of $1,333,343.73. D2. Approval of Summary Vacaljon of portions of three easements dedicated to the City on Tract Map No. 14365 which infringe on Tract Map No. 15526, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive (APN: 1077-821-53). RESOLUTION NO. 96-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF THREE NON-BUILDABLE EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT 15526 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE D3. Approval to award a contract (CO 96-058) for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Literacy Program Improvement Project to Lifetime Industries Incorporated, dba Parkwest Construction Company in the amount of $38,170.00 (plus a 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 28-4333-9618 (Community Development Block Grant) and Account No. 13-51700 (Redevelopment Agency). D4. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 96-059) for Concept, Design and Construction of the Lions East Environmental Learning Center to Jane Glickman Design in the amount of $200,000, to be funded from Fund 01-4650-9501. D5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lightjng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Design Review 96-17, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce, submitted by Wohl/Rancho Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 96-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DESIGN REVIEW NO. 96-17, MIMI'S CAFE RESOLUTION NO. 96-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DESIGN REVIEW 96-17, MIMI'S CAFE D6. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for DR 94-21, located on the east side of Toronto Avenue, north of Seventh Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ #P2433510 Labor and Material Bond #P2433510 36,200.00 18,100.00 City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 96-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 94-21, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF TORONTO AVENUE, NORTH OF SEVENTH STREET, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D7. Approval to accept the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and Street Improvements, from Haven Avenue east to the Railroad Spur, Contract No. 96-040, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $522,836.56. RESOLUTION NO. 96-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR JERSEY BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM HAVEN AVENUE EAST TO THE RAILROAD SPUR, CONTRACT NO. 96-040 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gufierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE RECOVERY OF COSTS FOR SECOND POLICE RESPONSES TO PARTIES Councilmember Gutierrez removed Item E1 for discussion by asking if officers can go to a party on the first response and give them a written notice. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated the officers basically do this now which helps to keep track of these problems. Matt Dedynski asked if the officer leaves a copy of the Ordinance with the resident having the party when they make their initial call. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated they will not have the Ordinance available to leave, but will explain what the process is as it relates to the Ordinance. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 561. ORDINANCE NO. 561 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.32 TO TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE RECOVERY OF COSTS FOR SECOND RESPONSES BY POLICE TO PARTIES AND OTHER ASSEMBLAGES City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 4 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 561. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-02 - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A request to amend the Development Distdct Map designaljon from Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 82 acres of land at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north, and the City will also consider an alternative designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). APN: 210-062-02, 11,13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. W~h this application the City will also consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan designation to alternative land uses for the remaining land bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west as follows: For approximately 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Sixth street and Hellman Avenue and bordered on the west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel the City will consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) or Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-05, 06, and 39. For approximately 45 acres of land bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, and Fourth Street on the south the City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial and Office as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-08, 10, 11, 13, 28, 31, and 34. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 564. ORDINANCE NO. 564 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-02, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, SUBAREA 16, INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 97 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, AND EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-02, 05, 06, 11,13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, 33, AND 39 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 564. Motion carded, 4-1 (Willjams voted no). E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-04 - CUCAMONGA CORNERPOINTE LLC - A request to remove 82 acres of land at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel bordered by Sixth Street on the north, from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purposes of rezoning the land to Development Code Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 5 With this application the City will also consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 to alternative land uses and amending development standards for the remaining land bounded by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east, Fourth Street on the south, and Hellman Avenue and the Cucamonga Creek on the west as follows: Removing approximately 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Hellman Avenue and bordered on the west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purposes of rezoning the land to Development Code Low Medium Residen~al (4-8 dwelling units per acre) or Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-05, 06, and 39. Removing approximately 45 acres of land bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Archibald Avenue on the east and Fourth Street on the south from the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the purpose of considering Development Code Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, and Office as alternative land uses. APN: 210-062-08, 10, 11, 13, 28, 31, and 34. 3. Consider changing the development standards and land use activities for Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 565. ORDINANCE NO. 565 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-04, TO DELETE 97 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, AND EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUBAREA 16, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-02, 05, 06, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, 33, AND 39 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 565. Motion carded, 4-1 (Williams voted no). E4. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 50 MPH ON MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO BANYAN STREET, A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM SPRUCE AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT AND A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON ROCHESTER AVENUE FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO BANYAN STREET Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 566. ORDINANCE NO. 566 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 566. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items were submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF DAY LABORER ISSUE (Oral) Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he and Coundlmember Curatalo along with Captain Ron Bieberdorf and other staff met to discuss this issue. They concluded that more monitoring should be done near Grove at Arrow whenever possible. They felt they should put information in the Grapevine and Channel 3 about the Ordinance regulating Day Laborers. He stated they felt they should post a sign to this effect on the corner of Grove and Arrow. He stated a letter has been sent to the City of Upland reminding them of the Day Laborer problem and suggested they beef up their patrol for this area also. He stated he and Councilmember Curatalo did have sympathy for those residents in that area that have to put up with this problem. Councilmember Curatalo felt this was a good step forward to not only help at this location but City-wide also. ACTION: Per direction from Subcommittee items identified have been implemented. 12. DISCUSSION OF DE BERRARD PROPERTY (Oral) Coundlmember Biane stated after the last meeting there were issues brought up by Mr. DeBerrard and felt this should be referred to the Planning Commission to reconsider his property. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Council can direct staff to initiate an amendment and then they would proceed to open this up with the Planning Commission and bring a report back to the City Council with a recommendation. He stated another option would be for this Council by minute action agree to initiate such an amendment, and then it would be incumbent upon the applicant to actually file for and process the amendment to expand the degree of acreage allowable for commercial. He reiterated by stating Council can initiate it and staff undertake the process for advertising and noticing, or ask the applicant if he wishes to proceed forward with it. He clarified that they are talking about changing the designation of five acres of something to a greater size. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 7 Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see this go back to the Planning Commission, but did not want to see any other fees placed on the DeBerrards. Coundlmember Biane stated he would agree with Mayor Alexander to return this to the Planning Commission. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Alexander to refer this back to the Planning Commission to reconsider. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 13. DISCUSSION OF THE ROLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AND THE CITY COUNCIL (Oral) Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was contacted by the Chairman of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and that they would like to meet with the City Council Subcommittee for the Foundation to discuss the Library Foundation because he was not aware of the existence of the Library Foundation. He stated the Foundation Chair wondered if there was enough work for both Foundations to do. He stated Mr. Dutton was wondering what the goals of the Community Foundation should be. He suggested he and Councilmember Williams get together with Bob Dutton to address some of his concerns. Councilmember Williams felt it might be better if the Library Foundation Subcommittee of Councilmembers Gutierrez and Biane meet with Mr. Dutton. Councilmember Gutierrez stated that would be fine, and if they needed to, they would bring back any information to the entire Council. Councilmember Williams also suggested that the entire Council meet with the Foundation in the Spring. 14. DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS Coundlmember Biane stated he put this on the agenda to try to put distance between the Planning Commission and politics. He stated Bred Buller has some information to present and that he would like to go back to where the appointments were in the past. Brad Buller, City Planner, displayed a graph (which is on file in the City Clerk's office). He stated the current Ordinance reads that at every election, Planning Commission appointments will occur following that election. He stated in November 1993, the Council seated at that time through minute action, extended some of the terms of the Commissioners and appointed two new Commissioners. He stated at that time they said the terms would run from July to July. He stated they had Commissioner Melcher and Tolstoy, who had two year terms, concluding their terms in July 1996. He stated Commissioners Barker, McNiel and Lumpp had their terms concluding in July 1998. He reiterated this was by minute action. He stated Commissioner Lumpp left and Commissioner Tolstoy was put in his position to complete his term. He stated they then had Commissioners Barker, McNiel and Lumpp by minute action have their terms end in July 1998. He stated per the current Ordinance, the appointments were to be in January, 1997 and January 1999. He added that Commissioners Bethel and Madas were appointed by the July date, and that their terms are, as it stands right now, to be July 2000. He stated he agrees with Councilmember Biane that there is some confusion with all of this, and with the Council's direction, staff will take whatever the Council wants and put it in Ordinance form and follow it from then on. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 8 James Markman, City Attorney, stated the advice offered to the Council in the past is that the Commissioners sit in their office until their successors are appointed. He stated there are three Commissioners with their terms due in January 1997 and two in January 1999. He stated he does not want the Council to take a minute action to extend the Planning Commission terms. He stated three terms are due up in January, but if the Council wants to do something else, they need to correct this through an Ordinance. He stated if they want to, they can leave the Ordinance as is, and start the process to pick new commissioners now. Councilmember Curatalo asked what would be wrong with extending the Planning Commission terms for one year. Councilmember Biane stated there is nothing wrong with that, but felt al~er someone is elected they have to, as the Ordinance now reads, pick two or three new commissioners within a couple of months. He stated you may have up to three new Councilmembers to select Planning Commissioners for the next two years. Councilmember Curatalo stated he did not want to shorten their terms, but had no problem extending it one year. James Markman, City Attorney, stated if someone were to ask what staff should do right now, they would advise to advertise three Commission posiljons. He stated if the Council wants to direct them to do something different, like prepare an Ordinance for this to occur on an off year, they could do this. Mayor Alexander felt if this were changed to January 1998 it would really take this out of the political arena. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has no preference, but that he is disappointed that we did not know what we were doing prior to this. Councilmember Williams suggested a staff report with all of the City Attorney's information in it come back to the Council. Mayor Alexander felt it should be looked at and agreed with Councilmember Williams. James Markman, City Attomey, stated if an appointment process is not started, then the existing Commissioners will remain in office. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out the reason the Council did what they did in 1993 was because it was at a time when the City reorganized all of their Commissions, and because of this they had all of the Commissioners resign to go through a selection on this reorganization. They wanted to allow enough time to do this so it ended up being in July. They wanted to be fair to the people that were appointed so they could be given full terms and not mini terms so that is why they came up with what we have today. He stated staff was not directed to change the Ordinance, but this extension process and that is what has been followed since. James Markman, City Attorney, stated they will bring a staff report and a two ordinances back to the Council at their next meeting for them to consider which option they prefer. Coundlmember Biane stated he would like for this same timeline presented tonight to be included in the report for the next meeting. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to discuss forming a Task Force to review the Central Park property to see if they can get something going on this. City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 9 Coundlmember Williams felt the Route 30 Task Force was very successful and hoped that the same results could come about by doing this same thing for Central Park. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Gary Kendrick asked for Councilmembers Gutierrez and Biane to put the utility tax back on the agenda for fie Coundl to vote to put it on the ballot. He stated he expected the Council to do this so the people could vote on this matter. He stated he agreed with the Central Park idea and wondered where the funding will come from for it. He stated he felt all Commission appointments were political and did not think this can be changed to get politics out of it completely. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he and Councilmember Biane did win the election and that they beat Mr. Kendrick, Mr. Barker and everyone else, but that they can't make decisions in a span of two weeks that there are so many big issues coming up. He stated they are getting to all of the issues as fast as they can and are getting to their promises. Councilmember Biane stated he felt Mr. Kendrick is being unfair because he is being advised by his City Attorney, and that just because a citizen makes a request of the Council, he needs to refer to Mr. Markman before making a decision. He stated he did not appreciate being accused of not keeping campaign promises. He stated there is not one that he hasn't kept or hasn't backed down from the utility tax. He stated he wishes Mr. Kenddck would let them do their best job by being advised by legal counsel. Fred Deaux, 11036 Shaw, felt the current Planning Commission, whose terms are due to expire, have more time with the City than Councilmembers Biane or Gutierrez, and had a lot more experience as well. He stated he was disappointed with the political retribution involved, and did not see any reason to change terms because of the good service they provide to the City. He felt their terms should be lengthened, not shortened. K3. John Holt stated he noticed a large area on Foothill and the I-15 Freeway for a Regional Shopping Center. He felt there have been some poor decisions made on this subject and felt the Council should rediscuss it. Councilmember Gutierrez pointed out for those that were not present at the 6:00 p.m. special meeting, Councilmember Williams was appointed as Mayor Pro Tem. James Markman stated he did not advise the Council to "slip" in a tax on the people without a vote that he or any other City Attorney thought needed to be voted on. He added Rancho Cucamonga moved on a tax after there was a Court of Appeals opinion that said along with cases dating back 60 years, that Proposition 62 was an illegal requirement to refer a tax measure to a referendum contrary to the California Constitution. He stated in reacljon to this, the Jarvis people started a process, what we now call Prop 218, because they felt that court was fight. He stated maybe two or three years after that decision came down, and probably live years after Prep 6'2, the utility tax was suggested in Rancho Cucamonga, and other tax measures, hundreds of them, were adopted all over the state of California, relying on the Court of Appeals in that case. He added that years later, around December 1994 or 1995, along came the Guardino decision that absolutely flabbergasted everyone, reversed the Court of Appeals and 60 years of precedent that said it is acceptable to require a tax to be submitted to the voters before it is valid. He stated the question immediately arose about what happens to all ofthe taxes thatwere enacted based upon that case, five to seven years before any tax enacted after Prop 62. He stated the question was if that court case was going to be retroactive. He stated there is a ton of law that states it should not be retroaclive. He stated this decision is being processed fight now in a case involving Butte County, and that nobody knows the answer to this. He stated when a City adopts legislation, tax ordinance, or any other ordinance, the law says you only have three years to attack its validity. He stated this was asserted City Council Minutes December 4, 1996 Page 10 by the City of La Habra as one of the defenses to the Jarvis people attacking its utility tax, and that so far the courts have held that as a good defense. He stated whether or not the Council wants to do this or not as a matter of policy, the City has two defenses he has just cited as to why the utility user tax is valid and was valid in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and need not be submitted to a vote of the people. He stated the California Supreme Court may decide differently on this at some point. He stated without retroactivity, Rancho Cucamonga's utility tax is just as valid as any tax ever enacted by any municipality in the State of California. He stated Prop 218 indicates any tax enacted after January 1, 1995 must be submitted to the voters within two years. It also says It cannot be submitted to the voters except at an election where you pick your City Council members. The point being, if you are going to raise a tax in a City or ratify a tax, do it at the same time you elect a Coundlman. Pleaso note that does not include taxes enacted pdor to January 1,1995. He stated the obvious implication is that Prop 218 says the Guardino case was not retroactive as to taxes enacted pdor to January 1, 1995, which is a third defense that can be asserted. He stated some cities can do it if you declare an emergency financial situation, you may hold such election at an earlier time than at the time you hold your Council election. He stated the Council would have to legitimately adopt a Resolution stating there is an emergency financial situation requiring them to hold that election so you can raise more taxes. He pointed out all the Coundl is tn/ing to do is follow the advice of the City Attorney. He stated the Council is not trying to hide behind advice. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded Biane to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss (A) Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located on Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Valley Baseball and Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parties; regarding terms of payment; and (B) Personnel Matters per Government Code 54957 regarding Performance Evaluation of City Manager. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. During Executive Session the Council approved unanimously, 5-0, to execute Amendment No. 11 to Contract 92-064 with Valley Baseball. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: December 11, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetin.cl A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 11, 1996, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Manager; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF PROP 218 AND COUNCIL DIRECTION FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION A. PD-85 Staff report and overhead presentation was given by Jack Lam, City Manager. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated everyone wants to protect the two parks and does not want to see them go under. Councilmember Biane asked if there would be arguments for and against this in the package sent to the property owners. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he recommends not to do this because it is not outlined to do so in the wording of Proposition 218. He stated the City cannot spend any money to lobby for this either, but that any special interest group in the City can campaign for this as long as there is not any City money being spent. Mayor Alexander inquired if the City Council could campaign for this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated yes. Councilmember Willjams asked if they could spend their own personal funds to campaign. James Markman, City Attorney, stated yes. City Council Minutes December 11, 1996 Page 2 Councilmember Gutierrez inquired how many parcels will be eligible to vote. James Markman, City Attorney, stated about 24,800 parcels. Councilmember Biane asked who would be able to vote, the property owner or the tenant of the property. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is no way to know for sure who pays the assessment for the property, but that there will be a noljce mailed to the owner of the property which will state if the tenant is directly reliable to pay for the assessment, he should have the right to vote on this matter. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City will be doing everything possible to get the most up-to-date property owner listing. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the park will be closed if the election is lost. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that will have to be a decision of the City Council and that staff will need direction from the Council as to what should occur. He also reported the City will not be able to save any money on the capital side to help pay for the maintenance cost of the parks because of Prop 218, because if you save money on the capital side you would have to have a property owner vote to use that money for maintenance. He added they would like to put in an escalator to help with any incremental costs such as increases in electric or water. He added the Jarvis people do not object to this approach as long as they are put into the election validation. He stated staff would propose to put in a Gann limit initiative escalator in the ballot measure. Jack Lam, City Manager, commented on the three proposals for the possible election dates as was included in the agenda package. The City Council questioned the preparation of the Engineer's report. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it would be prepared by the Assessment Engineer, and that it would be completed by January 15. Councilmembers Biane and Williams felt the election should take place sooner rather than later. Mayor Alexander stated he hoped there would be time to get information out to the people so they would be better educated when they go to vote. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is in favor of doing it at the April date. He felt the Council should decide their policy on how it will affect the parks and the service level, not only for Red Hill and Heritage, but all other City parks as well. He stated he didn't want this to affect all of the parks, but to instead close these two parks if the election doesn't pass. Councilmember Williams asked if there is any reserve money if the election doesn't pass. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is six months reserves for the O & M because of the tax collections. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Bill Holly, speaking as a private citizen and also with the Chamber of Commerce, stated he cares about the two parks and that he helped to establish PD-85. He stated Red Hill and Heritage Parks are the heaviest used parks in the City, and that these two parks set the standard for other communities and their parks. He felt the people of Rancho Cucamonga take great pdde in Red Hill and Heritage Parks and that everything should be done to preserve them. He stated he realized this is a very difficult City Counicl Minutes December 11, 1996 Page 3 decision for the Council and that the community needs to also look at this issue very seriously. He pointed out he did not think rushing the election date would be the best approach because of the possibility of new legislation that might get approved which could save the parks if the election lost. He felt lhat the conservative approach should be taken with this issue. He also mentioned when this district was first formed, the Chamber assisted in geffing it approved. He felt the community would like this with the utility tax, and that this election would be the first time the public would be able to vote on an assessment. He stated he is willing to help preserve the parks in any way he can, but asked the Council to clearly clarify exactly what they are doing. He asked that the parks not be closed down. Mark Dickey who lives in Red Hill area, stated he is associated with AYSO and felt the people need to know what the effect will be on the kids if the parks are closed if the election loses. He stated this would effect the number of games played for sporting activities because of the lack of facilities to play on, and that the public should be made aware of the consequences if the parks were to close. David Ogg, President of Citrus Little League, stated he canl even imagine closing the parks. He stated there is a lot to consider when you talk about closing the parks. He hoped it would not come to that. Pdmo Morales, Rancho Little League, felt the industrial/commercial owners are the ones that need to be educated about this matter. He didn~ think there would be a problem geffing the residential owners to go along with this election. Coundlmember Willjams commented on the mobile home parks and that the owners of the parks are the ones that pay the tax bills. Bob Dutton thought each mobile home space owner paid their own tax bill. Councilmember Gutierrez stated it will eventually come to the point that the City will run out of money if this election fails and then the parks would have to close. He added this is why he feels after the parks vote is completed, that the utility tax will have to go on the ballot. He stated if he decides to campaign for this, he will be happy to go door-to-door and felt the entire Council will have to work for making this election successful. He stated it will hurt the City badly to close any park. He added if the parks do close, that once the utility tax is put on the ballot, it will show the people what really can happen. Bruce Ann Hahn asked if this had to be an anonymous vote by the property owners. She stated she would want to know if a large landowner votes against this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is no way of knowing this. He stated if this is a protest hearing, everyone will know who votes against it. Bob Dutton felt the campaign needed to be done with the sports groups and that they need to get behind this. He felt the emphasis should be placed on the single family dwellings, and that he and Chuck Buquet will also work to get behind this effort and start campaigning for this. He inquired if they should follow the lobbying election rules, James Markman, City Attomey, stated they should form a committee just like they would at any other election. Bob Dutton asked if another district could be formed if this one fails. James Markman, City Attorney, and Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes. Councilmember Willjams asked what was the life of the bonds. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated 2005. City Council Minutes December 11, 1996 Page 4 Bill Holley commented on when PD-85 was formed and what they went through to get it. He urged the Coundl to consider running a 1972 landscaping and lighting district assessment program and having it in place before July 1, 1997, and then go to implement Prop 218 in fiscal year 1997-98 which would allow for more time for legislation to come down to clear up ambiguities or possibly court clarification on this. Mayor Alexander stated this is not an easy decision. Councilmember Williams asked when the utility tax could go on the ballot. James Markman, City Attomey, stated under Prop 218 the only viable election for the utility tax would be at the next Council election which would be November 1998, unless the Council declares it an emergency. Councilmember Williams inquired if an emergency was declared when could it go on the ballot. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, stated it would have to be June because the deadlines have already passed for the March election to get something on the ballot. Councilmember Williams inquired what the deadline is to put something on the June ballot. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, estimated it would be approximately February. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it is hard for him to imagine how he would develop a Resolution stating the facts that this is an emergency. Doug Morris, representing 5 Little Leagues in Rancho Cucamonga, felt there should be a focus on the residents to get this approved. He hoped that the fields do not become the icing on the cake and reiterated that they are really needed. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, felt they should go ahead with the later alternative, but should go ahead and get the process started now because this would get everyone past tax time and into the summer when people use the parks the most. He felt instead of closing the parks, if the election fails, the O & M would have to be decreased and a lower level of service given to all of the parks. Mayor Alexander stated he would go along with Option D and wait as long as possible to have the election. Coundlmember Biane stated he would like to see PD-85 voted on now or as soon as possible so that the utility tax can go on the ballot after that. Councilmember Williams stated she is not counting on there being any legislative relief. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is an effort to get more clarification on this, but didn't know when that would happen. Coundlmember Guljerrez felt it should be done as late as possible and that then the utility tax could go on the ballot in November. Councilmember Williams stated she would go with Option D, Mr. Dickey felt the May option is better than the June date because he felt a lot of people would be on vacation in June. He mentioned the April date would be during Spring Break. Jack Lam, City Manager, inquired if the amount should be asked for at $31 or $52. City Counicl Minutes December 11, 1996 Page 5 James Markman, City Attorney, stated they would bring two Resolutions to the Council for ballot wording and that they could decide then which amount they wanted to go with in the measure. Councilmember VVilliams asked for their to be some sort of a chart to show the history of this district's rate. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: January 1, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for this date was cancelled due to the National Holiday. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on January 15, 1997, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR P~RIOD: 12-11-96 (96197) RUN DATE: 12111196 PAGE: I VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRIPTZON MARR NO MARR. ANT. 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, TNC 6831 i-NEST 6373 A-CO SANZTATION 273Z ABC LOCKSMITHS 6367 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 6207 ALERT CONNUN1CATTONS CO. 1630 ANERTCAN BUSINESS FORMS 6566 AMHEALTH NED.GROUP OF CALI'F.wP.C. 2693 ANTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO. 16568 ASCE/NEMBERSHZP 26 ASSOCIATEO ENGINEERS 1061 AMARDS BY CHAMPION 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 1267 BLAKE PAPER CO-e INC. 16~69 BLOCKERe OANIELLE 5266 BO8'S CANDIES, INC. 552 BURK-BLACKSCHLEGERe ROSEANN 6010 BUSINESS PUBLISHERS, INC. 6856 C F. N ENTERPRISES 16572 CAFE JUSTICE 3962 CAL MESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 937 CALCOMP INC. 6735 CALOLYHPIC SAFETY 861 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS 68 CENTRAL C]:TIES SIGN SERVICE 688 CHEVRON U S 6279 CLARKe DEBORAH 3073 COLDRAMA 130 COMPUTER SERVTCE CO 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRTCAL DI'ST. 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER OIST 286 DAISY MHEEL RI'BBON COt INC 1291 DATAVAULT -U.S. SAFE DEPOSIT 60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF 196Z DURA ART STONE 977 E S RTe 1:NC. 3366 ETGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1358 ELLIS. JANA 6876 ENVICOH CORPORATION 229 EMING/:RRTGATION PRODUCTS 2510 FAIRVTEN FORD 6291 FAMILIAN PIPE & SUPPLY 126 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLANOe TNC. 6895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA 5007 GARCIAt OORI'NDA 3356 GARCIA, VIV1:AN 2836 GEIGER BROTHERS MEST 3992 G'rBBT°S FENCING MATERIALS ii CHECKI OVERLAP LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ((( 111767 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE 6ZLLZNGS ZNSTALLATZONISERVZCE OFFICE SUPPLIES MEOZCAL SERVICES MONTHLY SERVICE MEMBERSHIP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGRAVED PLAQUE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PNT SUBSCRZPTION RENEWAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REFRESHMENTS FOR MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REGISTRATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES GASOLINE CHARGES REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY MATER BILLINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES DATA STORAGE OENTAL INSURANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SOFTMARE SUPPORT FEES OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 111766, 106.35- 112082 112083 542.71 112086 121.66 112085 111.26 112086 126.95 11208? 736.00 112088 85.00 112089 799.65 112090 586.00 112091 556.18 112092 11Z093 5,619.75 112096 33.96 112095 309.77 112096 16,09 112097 15.00 112098 798.00 112099 23.76 112100 98.00 112101 135,31 112102 103.00 112103 255.00 112106 97.00 112105 82.69 112106 98.00 112107 319.90 112108 76.75 112109 88.25 112110 186,19 llZlll 110392.89 112112 187.69 112113 - 112116 I 112115 7,568,31 112116 210.53 113117 212.00 112118 21,115.38 I 112119 11,972.33 llZIZO 12,212.55 112121 686,55 e 112122 63.18 112133 5,301,63 112126 100.71 I 112135 58,130.06 112126 377,62 112127 202.79 112128 23,573.75 112139 51.00 I 112130 55,67 112131 556.85 112132 969.27 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD; 12-11-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/11/96 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME XTEH DESCRIPTIO~ WARR NO NARR. ANT. 16570 GLENNT, NILLIE 16571 GOSSAGEw ROBIN 93 GOVERNNENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSO 744 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS 5268 GREGORY, GXNA 4902 GST TELECON CALIFORNIA, ~NC. 137 GTE CAL%FORNIA 14397 HANLET, SREVE 14601 HART, C, KRZSTZN 14399 HARVEY, DEBRA 2855 HAVEN NINE ~ LIQUOR CO. 485Z HOPKINS, LORZ 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 5269 MOMDYSHELL, ROBERT 161 HOYT LUNBER CO., SmN. 103 I C H A RETIREMENT TRUST-4S7 4254 IBM CORPORATION 3885 INLAND LAWNMONER 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4431 JON°S FLAG SHOP 4822 KARATSU, ROBERT 4128 KELLY EQUIPMENT 807 KING BEARING ZNCo 1471 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY 14398 LA FRENZ, CHARLENE 193 LAZRD CONSTRUCTION CO 321 LANDSCAPE WEST. INCo 600 LYNCNw JANIE 1062 M C X TELECONHUNZCATIONS 1062 H C ~ TELECONNUNZCATIONS 1439> HACOONALD, KAREN 76 MARKNAN,ARCZTNSKItHANSON,~ KING 3015 HC CALL, SUSAN 14400 NENGOLLO. RICHARD 749 NXJAC ALARM COMPANY 3316 MR. T'S 24-HR. TOWING 5014 HUNA-LANDA, LAURA J. 14402 N.F.PeAo 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14396 NIELSEN, NETTIE 523 OFFZCE OEPOT 1d, 394 OLD BALDY COUNCZL BOY SCOUTS OF Z3Z OHNTTRANS 1224 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVZCEeZNC. 16393 ORDER CENTER 4904 OTTt LAURA C4290 P.T. PRO SOUND F. ELECTRONZCS 3953 PACIFIC COAST AIR TOOL 9168 PAINTERe JASON ,, CNECKI OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND 112133 RECREATION REFUND # 112134 GFOA REVXEW FEE 112135 DEFERRED COHP 112136 REIN8 FOR BUSINESS RELATED EXP 112131 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND PARKZNG CITATION REFUNO RECREATION REFUND SUB-COMHZTTEE MEETINGS MILEAGE REINBURSENENT 93/94 COBG CONTRACT LIBRARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OEFERREO COMP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUBSCRZPTZONS RECREATION SUPPLIES REZHBURSENENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SAFETY SHOES RECREATION REFUNE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LANDSCAPE NAXNTENANCE RECREATION SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SERVICES TELEPHONE SERVICES ENGINEERZNG <<< PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND ALARN SERVICES TOWING REIMBURSERENT SEMINAR VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE RECREATION OFFICE SUPPLIES REFUND SECURITY OEPOSIT BUS PASSES STRIPING SERVICES NXSC XNSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCXSE CLASS SOUND & ELECTRONICS SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS 112138 112139 - 112139 >~> I 112140 112141 112142 112143 112144 112145 112146 112147 112148 112149 I 112150 I 112151 112152 112153 112154 112155 112156 112157 112158 I 112159 I 112160 112161 · 112162 112163 112164 112165- 112165 I 112166 112161 112168 112169 112170 112171 112172 · 112173 112174 · 112175 112176 112171 I 112178 112179 112180 1121U1 112182 112183 98.00 10.00 480.00 5,063.00 93078 490.00 1,740.42 69.00 30.00 4.00 321.92 131.70 633.33 85005 6.85 186~1.00 1,457.17 73.36 31.08 132.53 55.00 830.48 288°23 60.00 22.50 11,8Z5,00 10,109.00 30.90 580.63 3~8.70 250.00 141043.30 18.00 200.00 730.00 80.00 123.79 250.00 92.21 100.00 2,356.40 500.00 219.00 12e233.09 9.95 306.90 165,00 586.96 IS.O0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-11-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/11/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO MARRe ANT° 6699 PARK SPECZALITIES 9767 PFS 9772 POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN 6601 PRAXAIR 3286 PRINCIPAL HUTUAL 583 PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 351 R r_ R AUTOMOTIVE 1890 R & R LIGHTING 618 R M A GROUP 266 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9769 RAMIREZe ANTONIO d,, 70 RANCHO CUCAHONGA CHAMBER 6639 RASTER GRAPHICS 376 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 6Z6 ROBLESt RAUL P-t SR, 5205 ROB0 ONE 9770 ROGERS & SHANKS 5239 S.B. COUNTY, DEFT OF INFO SVCS 216 SAN BERN CO SOLIO HASTE MGMENT 305 SAN BERN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION/FLO 5029 SAN 8ERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT. 132 SAN OIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. 3896 SENECHAL e CAL ,e CHECKI OVERLAP MAINTENANCE SERVICE & SUPPLIES 8 112186 RESOURCE SERVICES SUPPLIES 112185 PERMIT OVERPAYMENT 112186 EQUIPMENT RENTAL I 112187 MEDICALIDISAMZLZTT INSURANCE 113188 PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR 112189 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 112190 VEHICLE MAINTtSUPPLIES&SERVZCE I 112191 MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES 112192 SOIL TESTING SERVICES I 112193 RECREATION SUPPLIES 11Z194 PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUNDS 112195 MEMBERSHIP MEETING I 112196 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES I 113191 PRINTS 112198 TIRE REPAIR I 112199 MAINTENANCE LABOR & SUPPLIES e 112200 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 112Z01 RAOIO SERVICES # 112202 MONTHLY SERVICE 112203 AGREEHENT FLO00 CONTROL 112Z06 UNOERGROUND TANKS 112205 HAINT SUPPLIES 112206 OFFICE SUPPLIES 112207 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 112208 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC TELEPHONE SERVICES 2666 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS SIGNS 692 SIR SPEEDY 5250 SKYTEL 1327 SMART & FINAL 317 135 9771 905 5272 SO CALZF EDISON CO. SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDtINC REGISTRATION SO- CALIF TURFGRASS COUNCIL ARBORICULTURE SEMINAR SOIL & PLANT LABORATORYe INCo SOIL TESTING SERVICES SONZC COMMUNICATIONS e XNC, COMMUNICATION KITS 1632 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5267 STEELCOB INC, 6986 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 279 SUNm THE 6665 T & G ROOFING 2366 TARGET 1151 TECHNTC 6873 TROPHY CENTER OF ALTA LOMA 6558 U.,S* GUARDS CO,, INC, 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3637 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE CU3912 UNIQUE CREATIONS 3216 URZSA 3622 VIKZNG OFFICE PROOUCTS FAXES SKYMAIL DAY CAMP SUPPLZES ((( 112216 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MOTORCYCLE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUBSCRXPTION SERVICE & SUPPLIES YOUTH PROGRAM & OAT CAMP SUPPL OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES SECURITY GUARD SERVICE UMP SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES MENBERSHZP OFFICE SUPPLIES <<< llZZZO - l 112209 112210 112211 112212 112213 112216 112215 112216 112217 112218 112219 112226 >)> 11222T 112228 112229 112230 112231 112232 112233 112336 112235 112236 112237 112338 112339 113260 600.00 63,62 189,56 361,71 63e775.58 80,00 117.35 708,90 83,31 ZmMZg,SO 3/.IS 250,00 200,00 939,07 8,21 281o00 502,00 20,78 372,75 7,822,83 10m650.00 591o25 126,99 28t867,95 171,50 603,07 160.63 50°03 188,57 21.66 78,698.16 25.00 130,00 ZOS.O0 3,481.00 20m328.61 53.88 110,00 63,03 6e626,00 136.S6 265.00 22.63 lmOZ5,OZ 2,110,25 317.34 134,69 60.00 1m964.05 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LZST OF MARRANTS FOR PERXDD: 12-11-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/11/96 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRZPTZON NARR NO WARRe ANT, 499 V]:S]:ON SERVTCE PLAN- (CA) 1103 VTSTA PAZNT 2360 VORTEX ZNDUSTRZES 213 t~AX[Et KLEEN-LZNE CORP 4,577 MELLS FARGO GUARD SERVI:CES 4331 NEST END YI~CA 9764 MESTERN OEVELOPMENT 267 klESTERN ROCK CO 5ZZZ NHZTE CAP ZIZ M/'LLDAN ASSOCZATES 371. ZEE MEDTCAL SERVTCE 1510 ZETTERBERGe BOB e, CHECKI OVERLAP NONTHLT VZSZON SERVZCE 8ZLLZNG MAZNT SUPPLZE$ MAZNT SERVZCE & REPAZRS NAZNT SUPPLZES SECURZTY GUARD SERVZCES FZLES QRTLY REVZEN PERNZT OEPOSZT REFUNO ASPHALT & CONCRETE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES PROFESSZDNAL SERVZCES RECREATZON SUPPLZES REXMBURSENENT 112241 7s081.10 112242 291.52 112243 1,103.09 112244 1,102o99 112245 2,148.61 112246 1,731.93 112247 1,000o00 112248 210.00 112249 10.96 112250 19727°39 112251 68,64 112252 ~0,69 TOTAL 488,663,39 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIbT OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-18-96 (96/975 RUN DATE: 1ZI18196 PAGE= VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR ND WARRo ANT, 14½03 KANGt RAN 16565 GRIGSBY DEVELOPMENT 4544 DICK, ERIC 626 ROBLES, PAUL P-t SR. 350 U.S. POSTMASTER 3214 URISA 602 MEYERe PAT 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3070 ABSOLUTE ASPHALTm INC. ~e347 ACCURATE 5MOGm AUTOm TRUCK & 3785 ACTION ART 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 16573 ALCORN, RICHARD 4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO, 5139 ALL AMERICAN CRANE MAINTENANCE 17 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO, 1~m30 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS 4~60 AMTECH LIGHTING SERVZCFS 2(:,93 AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO. 4443 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 2437 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE 1061 AWARDS BY CHAMPION 1040 8AKERm DUANE 4475 BARNES & NOBLE 16579 BARNES, JEFF 16574 BARNETTe SUSAN 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 47 BELL & HOWELL 4336 BENGAL RECYCLING, INC, 254 BRANDMAN ASSOC. INCm MICHAEL 1862 BRATT, MORNEEN K, 16576 BRISENOIm ANNETTE 4369 BRODART BOOKS 3193 8RUNICKm ALVAREZ & BATTERSBY 16575 BUSINESS PRESSm THE 457 C & E LUMBER CO 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 5273 CALIF. BLDG. OFFICIALS TRNG, INST. 1~.1 CALIF. SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE 16577 CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY ~m877 CASHIER, DEPT OF PESTIDE REGULATION 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL RECREATION REFUNO <<< 108225 REIMBURSEMENT (<( 1084Z0 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH <<< 111584 TIRE REPAIR <(< 112028 POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER ((( 112081 MEMBERSHIP <<< 112240 REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES ((( 11225~ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE REPAIRS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS PRIMe CA. CODE ENFORCEMENT MTG INSTALLATION/SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SERVICE/SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES LIGHTING SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE ENGRAVED PLAQUE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT MTG LIBRARY SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMB CA. CODE ENFORCEMENT MTG MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION REFUND (<< 112281 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 800KING FEES SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE REGISTRATION FOR EDUCATION WK MEMBERSHIP DUES 95/96 CLSA SPECIAL SERVICES AGRICULTURAL PEST CNTL LICENSE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RENTAL - AUDITORIUM RoC.MoSo CHECKme OVERLAP 108224~ 24.15- 108418 108419~ 1,683.38- 111582 111583# 75,00- 112026 112027 50.00- 112079 >>> 112080~ 500.00 112238 112239 60.00- 112252 112253,~ 200.00 112255 >>> 112256 316.79 112257 1 m077,50 m 112258 99.96 I 112259 666,97 ~e 112260 606.80 I 112261 48.00 I 112262 811.75 112263 282,50 112264 88,00 112265 362.09 112266 2,~18.51 112267 125.00 112268 360.00 112269 lm761.59 I 112270 lm387.73 112271 18.00 112272 645.50 112273 18.00 11227~ 30.00 I 112275 38.13 112276 126,25 112277 489,06 112278 371.80 112279 18.00 112280 18.75 112283 >>> 11228~, 3m098.26 112285 28.66 112286 ~9,00 112287 413.76 112288 75,00 112289 lm030.00 112290 50.00 112291 2m997,00 112292 30.00 112293 3~3.94 112294 1m362.37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-18-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/18t96 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP. ANT. ~mmm CHECKI OVERLAP 570 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112295 600.00 3118 CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 11Z296 673.25 74 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES 112297 80,40 4211 COAST RECREATION, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 112298 4~1.21 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 112299 579.95 826 COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 112300 2,.196.04 4907 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. E~UIPMENT 112301 209.34 4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 112302 112.63 <<< 112303- 112307 85 CUCAMDNGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 112308 16m672.21 Z~m05 OAFPER TIRE CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE &SUPPLIES 112309 16580 DE ANTONIOm SUSAN REIMBURSEMENT 112310 18.00 107 DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 112311 370.66 1551 DFM ASSOCIATES SUBSCRIPTION 112312 41.04 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 112313 716,87 4632 DIGITAL TELECOMMUNZCATIONS PARTS &INSTALLATION 112314 50.00 779 E-Z RENTS RECREATION RENTAL 112315 140,~.4 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES # 112316 lm320,48 1258 ELLIS. JANA REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE /~ 112317 75.48 4524 ELLISON EDUCATION EQUIPMENT LIBRARY SUPPLIES 112318 30.98 4360 EMP AMERICAm INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 112319 424.43 5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE MISC 112320 468.00 5262 EVANS SPORTING GOODS RECREATION SUPPLIES 112321 7m161.15 229 EWING IRRIGATION PROOUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES ~ 112322 430.43 12~, FENCE CRAFT OF UPLANDm INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112323 lm276.27 2397 FIRST SOLUTIONS COMPUTER SUPPLIES/RENTAL 112324 269.38 ,,.895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 112325 lm484.48 4879 FLEET GLASS LABOR & SUPPLIES I 112326 156.78 1082 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 112327 23.65 3992 GIBBY'S FENCING MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112328 858.00 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTSm INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11Z329 3,150.00 16578 GRIFFINm ANN RECREATION REFUNO 112330 75.00 <<( 112331- 112332 >>> 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS Am 112333 5,719.1~ ~m62 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Am 112334 1m856.91 2255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 112335 517.20 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSm INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 112336 lm176,77 2733 I C M A MEMBERSHIP DUES 112337 75.00 4188 I,O, BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Me 112338 312,47 14404 INLAND EMPIRE MANGER'S ASSDC. MISC 112339 36.00 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 112340 4m309,00 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS t 112341 165.76 122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ADVERTISING # 112342 2m956,22 855 INTERSECTION DEVELOPMENT CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Me 112343 18,184.80 1941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRONm INC. MAINT SUPPLIES I 112344 19m324.59 612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 112345 156.26 14403 KANGm RAN RECREATION REFUND 112346 4728 KATER-CRAFTS ~OCKBINDERS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 112347 403.1~ 4128 KELLY EQUIPMENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES 112348 162.30 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 112349 268.27 4764 KULI IMAGE INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 112350 4m394.31 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-18-96 C96/97) RUN DATE: 12/18/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AHT. 321 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 4958 LIFE COMM 4763 MARKS CABLEVISION 5255 MARTEL INTERIOR5 3907 MABTER-5ORT, INC. 4032 MEAN5 CO., R.5., INC. 602 HEYERe PAT I4405 MILLERm BLAINE 5257 MINITEX LIBRARY INFORMATION 380I MITCHELL '5 14406 MORRISONe PAT 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT 14407 NORRISm CINDY 5221 NORSTAR INDUSTRIES 523 OFFICE DEPOT 235 OWEN ELECTRIC 5217 PAPER SHOWCASE 487 PATTON 5ALES CORP. 757 PEP BOY5 693 POwERSTRIDE ~ATTERY CO., INC. 583 PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 264 RALPH5 GROCERY COMPANY ~278 RIVERAm MANUEL DISC JOCKEY 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 4679 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK r. RECORDER 5239 S.B. COUNTY, DEPT OF INFO SVCS 8340 SAN DIEGO AREA CHAPTER ICBO 9773 SANDERS, MILLIE 3313 SARTOR'S MOBILE HOME, PETE 4350 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 9774 SECOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. ~202 SERVICE CONSTRUCTION ~ SUPPLY 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC 351 SIGN SHOP, THE 1327 SMART & FINAL 36 SMIDERLEe BEA 319 SO CALIF GAS CO, 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 397 SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS 2995 SPACESAVER SYSTEMBm INC. 9775 5TOFAe JOE 5260 5UCCES5ORIE5 2344 TARGET 1151 TECHNIC 5219 TREADCO 4873 TROPHY CENTER OF ALTA LOMA 9776 TULEYe TERRY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRESORT MAIL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT LIBRARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REIMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LION5 CNTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES ENTERTAINMENT PRINTS MICROGRAPHIC SERVICES RADIO SERVICES 01 RECREATION REFUNDS REHAB PROGRAM LIBRARY SUPPLIES PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SERVICES MAINT SUPPLIES DAY CAMP SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS MONTHLY GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MONTHLY COMPUTER CONTRACT SUPPLIES/SERVICE REIMB CHRISTMAS DINNER OFFICE SUPPLIES YOUTH PROGRAM & OAY CAMP SUPPL OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES R~IM8 CHRISTMAS DINNER ** CHECKI OVERLAP t 112351 22,54Z.00 # 112352 433.66 112353 425.11 112 354 1,369.44 112355 250.00 112356 ~1.89 112357 274.57 112358 560.00 112359 18.00 112360 Z4Z.O0 112361 20.20 112362 18.00 112363 91.67 112364 18.00 112365 14,347.00 <<< 112366- 112368 e 112369 4e134.70 I 112370 23~e.38 112371 55.80 m 112371 42.35 112373 21.54 112374 176.17 112375 155.43 I 112376 458.52 112377 25.20 e 112378 650.00 t 112379 30.73 112380 253,00 112381 210.00 112382 25.00 112383 200.00 112384 I m687.50 112385 24.00 112386 leO00.OO 112387 2m850.81 I 112388 322,89 e 112389 1,122.22 le 112390 183.57 I 112391 82.66 e 112392 2,099.09 112393- 112395 >)> m 112396 8e406.89 11239T 575°00 112398 499.00 112399 18.00 I 112400 767.53 112401 26.30 112402 173.44 # 112403 262.65 e 112404 3,263.96 112405 18,00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-18-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/18/96 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR ND WARgo AMT, 5201 TUMBLING DICE, INC, 6,558 U,S, GUARDS CO,,, INC, 36,37 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36,37 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 5233 UNISTRUT 3214 URISA ~787 VAN GALAAN LQC~ & KEY 667 VISA 667 VISA 2993 WHYTErn DIANE 209 XEROX CORPORATION LA60R & SUPPLIES SECURITY GUARO SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP SUPPLIES VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS RTE 30 MEETING COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE · , CHECKi OVERLAP 1126,06 875.00 I 1126,07 lm820.95 ae 112~08 120.05 112~.09 13,96 1126,10 99,13 e 112~11 60.00 112~.12 11,31 112~,13- 1126,13 I 1126,16, 2m870o6,2 112~.15 11.65 112~.16 18.00 I 1126,17 3,,938,27 TOTAL 201,,687o05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-26-96 (96/91) RUN DATE: 12/26/96 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO WARRe AHT. 161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. 9725 REBAR BUILDER 1103 VISTA PAINT 5:>43 ARLY SOUND 6673 B & O SPECIALTIES, INC. 6363 BANK OF AMERICA 16583 BROWN, VINCENT 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 16584 CONCEPT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 6566 OICKm ERIC 16581 DWYER, SHERRI 526Z EVANS SPORTING GOODS 16585 EVERETT, BARBARA 16582 FOREA, OIANE 16608 GALBRATH, DIANA 168~+ GENTRY BROS. m INC. 764 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS 137 GTE CALIFORNTA 3336 HEILIG, KELLY 6865 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH 16609 MOCKEL, KIMI 3633 HOMELE55 OUTREACH PRGMS & EOUCATZON 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 1056 HOVEY ELECTRIC, INC. 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-657 1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD- 907 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 979 LEWIS HOMES 632 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 16~10 MANELA, ROSE 76 MARKMANmARCZYNSKImHANSONm& KING 5230 MIHLO'S AIR CONDITIONING 3632 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 338 PACIFIC EQUIPT & IRRIGATIDNm INC. 6556 PITASSI, PETER J. 3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES 6601 PRAXAIR 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 1890 R & R LIGHTING 618 R M A GROUP 6323 RAM MOBILE DATA USAm LP 9725 REBAR BUILDER 565 RED WING SHOE STORE 9777 REGANm MIKE 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 16 ROTARY CORPORATION 9778 SABATINI t JOSEPHE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND MAINT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REFUND CLASS MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE OF THE HONTH RECREATION REFUND RECREATION SUPPLIES CLAIM SETTLEMENT RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND PROGRESS PAYMENTS OEFERRED COMP MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MONTHLY RENT RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY SERVICES 93/96 CDBG CONTRACT PROGRESS ESTIMATE DEFERREO COMP TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LANDLORO/TENANT OISPUTE ANNUAL DUES REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT FEES REGISTRATION REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REHABo PROGRAM OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM EQUIPMENT RENTAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES SOIL TESTING SERVICES COMMUNICATION CHARGE DEPOSIT REFUND SAFETY BOOTS CLAIH SETTLEMENT PRINTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS a~, CHECKI OVERLAP 110271, 7.36 110278- 111358 >>) 1113591 1,000.00- 111360- 112241 11226Z~ 291.52- 112263- 112619 112620 100.00 112621 39770.10 112422 320,00 112623 200.00 tm 112626 327,03 112625 26,26 Mm 112626 75.00 112627 180.00 I 112628 3m560.67 112629 830,00 112~30 200,00 112631 87,50 Re 112432 40m786.20 112633 5mO63eO0 I 112636 85~,.39 112635 306.72 112636 19000.00 112637 9.00 112638 150o00 112439 633.33 112.~40 81615e40 112661 1,661o00 I 112~2 2,326.50 II 112663 1,756,55 112644 11,520,00 112665 lmO00.O0 112446 500°00 112667 21,23 112448 9m480,50 I 1124~9 lm580,00 112650 670.99 t 112651 22.38 112652 229,,56 112453 1m066,2S 112656 80,04 t 112455 118.76 112656 263,52 I 112657 2,687,00 t 112658 2m856,66 112659 1,000,00 112~60 117,23 112661 380.00 I 112662 1t293,,05 · 112663 126,68 112466 5,00 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-24-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 12/Z4/96 PAGE: 2 ...,,,,..,e..,.,.....,..p......., .... VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~m, CHECK~e OVERLAP 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COm INC MAZNT SUPPLIES I 11Z~65 773.65 9779 SERGIm OOROTHY RECREATION REFUNDS 112466 35.00 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOMe INC TELEPHONE SERVICES I 1126.67 4,268.63 351 SIGN SHOPm THE MAINT SUPPLIES 112z~8 ZBw18 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS 8ILLS I 112~69 143o79 234~, TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 112470 7Z.07 · T38 TRINITY ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES 112~71 157,22 3~37 UNIFIRST UNIFORH SERVICE 'UNIFORM SERVICES · 112~72 378.95 ~T87 VAN GALAAN LOCK & KEY SUPPLIES 112473 3,T7 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES # 112474 902,45 4002 WASTE MANAGEMENT INDUSTRIES MASTE MANAGEMENT · 112475 ZOZoZO 213 WAXIEm KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES e 112476 397,86 ~577 WELLS FARGO GUARO SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES e 112~77 Zm365,37 ~331 WEST END YWCA FILES qRTLY REVIEW 11Z~78 lm893.04 167 WESTERN ROCK CO ASPHALT:& CONCRETE 11Z179 30°00 3080 WHITTIER FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES I 11Z~80 2,343,57 ~3ZO WILCO SECURITY SECURITY SYSTEM LEASE 112481 60.00 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 112~82 78.17 TOTAL 121m33~,02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF AN ORDER TO VACATE THE SERVICE VEHICLE TURNAROUND EASEMENT ON LOT 1. OF TRACT 13566-2, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF CHERRY AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of the service vehicle ramaround easement on lot 1, of Tract 13566-2, generally located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Cherry Avenue and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A temporary access easement was dedicated to the City on lot 1, of Tract 13566-2 (reference Vicinity Map). The subject easement was created to allow service vehicles to turn around when accessing the community trail along the east side of tract 13566-1. The recordation of tract 13566-2 provides a through access along the community trail from Wilson Avenue to Youngs Canyon Road for maintenance purposes. On September 11, 1996, the Planning Commission found the vacation of the temporary access m-around to be consistent with the General Plan by Resolution Number 96-56. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer Attachments WJO:MEP:dlw /,~7" / CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA N ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 i TRACT 13566 RECORDING REQUE.$TED BY City 6f Rm';cho Cucamonga WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 0/.f,~B. IN !¢ L RECORDS 933jN-7 AMIt: 22 COUNTY. Ct;UF. 93-2-;155:3 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'8 USE EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ROCKFIELD CARYN VENTURE, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP GRANT(S) to the City of Rancho Cuca. monga. a Municipal Corporation, an EASEMENT for TEMPORARY ACCESS {TURNAROUND) in, over and upon that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cuca.monga, County of Sztn Bernardino, SLate of California, Described as Follows: A TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13108 FILED IN BOOK 150, PAGES 10 THROUGH 11 OF MAPS. RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAiD PARCEL THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 00°18'01" WEST 34.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44041'59" WEST I O.O0 FEET; THE."JCE ."':O RTH 89 o .4.. I '59" WEST I 2. ~ 3 FEET; THE.":CE NORTH 00 o 1 ~ 'O I" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89041'59'. EAST t2.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°18'01.' EAST 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A". GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT ROCKFIELD CARYN VENTURE Slate of County 5S.. On this the day of the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared 19__, bolDre me, ~_1 personally known to me D proved Io me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) within inslrumenl, and acknowledged that WITNESS my hand and official seal. subscribed Io the executed it. Nota~'sSignalure /~ THIS IS A GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, PLEASE USE PROPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, I.E. PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATE,ETC. 93-241553 This Is to certify that the Interest in real property conveyed by the within instrument to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a City incorporated under the laws of the State of California, is hereby accepted by order of the CIty Council, and the grantee consent8 to the recordatlon thereof by Its duly authorized officer. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 022 ~ - 2,2. I - o/ SCALE: 1" = 10' EXHIBIT "A" 93-241553 L PARCEL 2 PARCEL MAP M ' O K RCE #24701 TRACT 14o. ,. 12.q~' 1 N Bi°44'Sq"w' -.,% A~WtOND AVE. EXPIRES: t2-31-93 ~D< ZQ u~°) uJ Ill .),. :rVi:LC. CIhfl.m.I r)271t l'Lonc (7~ l) I!NGINI!EI(ING ""'~ EASEMENT SHEET FOR TEMPORARY oF ACCESS TURNAROUND STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE > ss 93-241553 ) '.', ~ t~T; before me, Theresa L. Pointon, On / "- .... personally appeared Timothy L. Unger, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. wzT~ss my hand and otf~cial ~eaZ. 97 .ool A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED THE SERVICE VEHICLE TURNAROUND ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 13566-2, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF CHERRY AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the service vehicle turnaround provided for the community trail.: and WHEREAS, the City Council found, by all the evidence submitted, that the turnaround easement is unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes, it has never been used and no public money was expended for maintenance of same NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the turnaround easement, which is described in a legal description attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A', and by this referenced made a part hereof. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, Califomia. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. /7 EXHIBIT 'A' THAT CERTAIN TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN IN DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 7, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1993- 241553 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. N, L.S7 5347 ~ LS5347 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NBS PUBLIC RESOURCE GROUP IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,500.00 (PLUS 20% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND NO. 90-4130- 6028, FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING FOR PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT NO. PD-85 TO ACCOMPLISH A PROPERTY OWNER ELECTION, AS SET FORTH IN PROPOSITION 218 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve, award and execute the subject Professional Services Agreement with NBS Public Resource Group to provide Assessment Engineering services in conjunction with the property owner election for PD-85, as set forth in Proposition 218. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As part of the annual adoption process under the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act it is necessary to prepare an annual Engineer's Report for the district (PD-85). This report specifies the fiscal requirements to operate and maintain the district, reports the current number of assessment units within the district, and establishes the annual assessment rate required to generate the funds necessary to perform the operations and maintenance for the district. NBS Public Resource Group will be considered the Engineer of Work and responsible for the preparation of that Engineer's Report. In addition, as a requirement of the recently voter approved Proposition 218, a district-wide election must occur to ratify the district. NBS Public Resource Group will provide various services related to that election such as assisting in the preparation of legal notices and balloting procedures, and assist in the mailing and tabulation of the ballots. Respectfully Submitted,, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor Alexander & City Councilmembers Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPROVAL OF RENEWAL AGREEMENT LEAGUE FOR SNACK BAR AND FIELD USE WITH CITRUS LITTLE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the renewal Agreement with Citrus Little League for the use of the Citrus Little League Snack Bar and priority use of two (2) baseball fields at Red Hill Community Park. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1986, the City and Citrus Little League entered into a five (5) year renewable Agreement which allows for the first priority use of two (2) baseball fields and the Citrus Little League Snack Bar. Citrus Little League has been using the Red Hill Community Park for many years and assisted in the construction of the baseball fields and snack bar. The Agreement provides that Citrus Little League has the sole right to use the snack bar and provides public liability insurance coverage for the snack bar. The League is also granted first priority use of the two (2) northerly baseball fields through the City's Field Allocation Process. The Agreement was renewed in 1992, and it is recommended that this Agreement be renewed another five (5) to be effective January 1, 1997 through December 30, 2001. ~~}aServices Mana~ger ...... so/citrus97renew J DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 15, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Councfi Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT FEE AGREEMENT WHICH ADDS THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the execution of the Agreement which would add the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to the Agreement. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 1996 the City. Council and the Redevelopment Agency approved a Development Fee Credit Agreement (CORA96-010 and CO96-052) with Foothill Vineyards Center (Lewis Homes) in connection with the lease of approximately 34,000 sq.ft. of space for a proposed recreation center. The Agreement allows for the Agency's participation in the lease space improvements to be paid over a period of time. Each time Foothill Vineyards Center, or a Lewis affiliate, applies for a development application or permit, the Agency will pay the applicable fee. At the time of the Agreement's preparation it was intended for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to be included as well. However, all parties involved agree that the District was inadvertently omitted from the document and the signature page. ANALYSIS: Foothill Vineyards Center (Lewis Homes) has requested the Fire Protection District be added to the Agreement. Through this action, the legislative body will acknowledge the District as a party to the Agreement. The signature of the President of the Fire Board will be added to the Agreement as well. Thus, anytime Foothill Vineyards Center, or a Lewis affiliate, applies for a development application or permit with the District, the Agency will pay for the applicable fee, up to the $520,000 limit. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January, 15, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineereft SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 94-03, LOCATED AT 9551 LUCAS RANCH ROAD RECOMMENDATION The required street improvements for CUP 94-03 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Cup 94-03, is located at 9551 Lucas Ranch Road Developer: EZE Trucking 9551 Lucas Ranch Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Materials Bond $19,500.00 $ 9,750.00 Resp~cffu. lly submitted., William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB:ls Attachment _j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP q,S-04~LOCATED AT 9551 LUCAS RANCH ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of improvements for CUP~Oq, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20,050 PERTAINING TO THE MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1: Section 2.20.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "2.20.050 Membership - Length of terms. A. The five members of the Planning Commission initially appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Three members shall serve a term of four years and shall continue in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed as provided in the ordinance codified herein, and their successors shall be appointed for terms of four years. Two members shall serve for a term of two years and shall continue in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed as provided in Section 2.20,060, and their successors shall be appointed for terms of four years. If a vacancy shall occur, other than by expiration of the term of office, it shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the Council for the unexpired term. The term of any Planning Commissioner shall be extended for that length of time as may be necessary and convenient to appoint and set a successor Planning Commissioner. B. The term of office of each present member of the Planning Commission, presently scheduled to expire on the first day of January of an applicable odd-numbered year, is extended to the first day of January of the even-numbered year succeeding the scheduled time which each such term is set to expire. Thereafter, Planning Commission members shall be appointed to their customary scheduled terms to commence on the first day of January of even-numbered years." Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 5 (4~ ~ AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals. (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The Ci~' Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets w'ithin the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic sun,'ey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECT[ON 1. Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City, Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of State Law' Maximum Speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or sat~ under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Ordinance Page 2 Name of Street or Portion Af~r~cted 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 2{5. Archibald Avenue - Banyan Street to north end Archibald Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street Arrow Route - Baker Avenue to Haven Avenue Arrow Route - Haven Avenue to East City Limits Baker Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue Banyan Street - Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue Banyan Street from west City limits to Beryl Street Base Line Road - west City limits to Carnelian Street Base Line Road - Carnelian Street to Hermosa Avenue Base Line Road - Hermosa Avenue to Spruce Avenue Base Line Road - Spruce Avenue to east City limit Beryl Street - Banyan Street to end Beryl Street - 800' n/o Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street Canistel Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Antietam Drive Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to end Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street Church Street - Pepper Street to Haven Avenue Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue Church Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue East Avenue - Base Line Road to Highland Avenue 8th Street - Grove Avenue to Haven Avenue Etiwanda Avenue - 4th Street to Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue - Arrow Route to Foothill Blvd. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to 241h Street Fairmont Drive - Highland Avenue to Milliken Avenue Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH} 50 45 45 50 35 35 45 40 45 40 45 50 45 40 35 45 40 40 40 45 45 45 55 50 45 35 Ordinance Page 3 Name of Street or Portion Affected 27. Fairmont Drive - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 28. 4th Street - West City Limit to Haven Avenue 29. 4th Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue 30. 4th Street - Milliken Avenue to 1-15 3 I. 4th Street - I- 15 to Etiwanda Avenue 32. Fredricksburg Avenue - Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive 33. Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd. 34. Haven Avenue - 4th Street to Hillside Road 35. Hellman Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Loma Drive 36. Hellman Avenue - 500' n/o Manzanita Drive to Valley View 37. Hellman Avenue - 6th Street to Foothill Blvd. 38. Hermosa Avenue - Base Line Road to W'ilson Avenue 39. Hermosa Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Sun Valley Drive 40. Hermosa Avenue - 8th Street to Base Line Road 41. Highland Avenue - Sapphire Street to Camelian Street 42. Highland Avenue - Amethyst Street to Hermosa Avenue 43. Highland Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to 800' w/o Haven Ave. 44. Hillside Road - Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 45. Hillside Road - Amethyst Street to Haven Avenue 46. Hillside Road - Haven Avenue to Canistel Avenue 47. Hillview Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 48. Kenyon Way - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 49. Lark Drive - Kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue 50. Lemon Avenue - Jasper Street to Beryl Street 51. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 52. Lemon Avenue - Haven Avenue to Highland Avenue 53. Manzanita Drive - Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH' 35 50 50 55 35 40 45 35 40 45 45 40 45 40 35 45 35 40 35 30 35 35 35 40 40 35 Ordinance Page 4 Name of Street or Portion Affected 54. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH') Milliken Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street 50 Morning Place/Vintage Drive - Banyan Street to Milliken Ave. 35 Mountain View Drive - Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue 40 Netherlands View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 9th Street - Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue 40 Red Hill Country, Club Drive - Foothill Blvd. To Alia Cuesta 35 Rochester Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40 Rochester Avenue - Base Line Road to Banyan Street 45 San Bernardino Road - Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35 Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end 45 Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Lemon Avenue 40 7th Street - Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 45 Sierra Crest View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 Spruce Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40 6th Street - West City, limits to Archibald Avenue 45 Summit Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 45 Terrace View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30 Terra Vista Parkway - Church Street to Milliken Avenue 40 Victoria Street - Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue 35 Victoria Street - Etiwanda Avenue to Route 15 40 Victoria Street - Haven Avenue to Mendocino Place 40 Victoria Park Lane - Fairmont Way to Base Line Road 35 Victoria Windrows Loop (north and south) 35 Vineyard Avenue - Church Street to Base Line Road 40 Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Carnelian Avenue 45 Vintage Drive - Milliken Avenue to east end 35 Whittram Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to east City limits 40 Ordinance Page 5 Name of Street or Portion Af~:~cted 81. Wilson Avenue - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue 82. Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) Wilson Avenue - Haven Avenue to 200' e/o Canistel Avenue 45 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (pan), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124) (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than reasonable or safe; and (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (ii i) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima fac ie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify' to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. SECTION 3. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this th dav of January, 1997. AYES: NOES: None ABSENT: None William J. Alexander, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION OF VACATING AGATE STREET AND DISPOSING OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT 'C' OF TRACT 6846, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN HAMILTON AND MIGNONETTE STREETS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the vacation of Agate Street and disposition of City owned property by quitclaiming lot 'C' of Tract 6846, as shown on Map V-139, legal descriptions and plats, and Quitclaim Deed, legal descriptions and plats, respectively, and authorizing the City Engineer to sign the Quitclaim Deed and to present same to the County Recorder, along with a certified copy of the Resolution, with attachments, to be filed for record, upon adoption of this Resolution, subject to the compliance, improvement and acceptance thereof with the vacated Agate Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract Map No. 15730, generally located at the northwest comer of Beryl and Mignonette Streets, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 24, 1996, for a residential subdivision of 28 single family lots on 5.66 acres of land. One of the conditions for the development of the Tentative Tract Map is to vacate Agate Street, remove the existing pavement, curb, gutters, sidewalk, and regrading the area to conform to the adjacent homes. In addition, a new property line wall shall be constructed between the adjacent homes and extending and/or reconstructing the existing side walls to the new property line wall along with installing a 12 foot wide gate for each adjacent property. Any existing walls which are no longer needed shall be removed. The public improvements along Hamilton Street shall completed as well, across the vacated portion of Agate Street. All the improvements both public and private shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and adjacent property owners. _j CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VACATING AGATE STREET January 15, 1996 Page 2 An existing CCWD 6-inch water line in Agate street shall be removed and capped at Hamilton Street. The Developer of Tract 15730 shall complete the work upon approval of the street vacation. On October 9, 1996, the Planning Commission, by consent agenda, determined the vacation of Agate Street and disposition of City owned property, lot 'C' of Tract 6846, conforms with the General Plan and though minute action made a finding thereof. On December 18, 1996, the City Council passed by Resolution No. 96-180 declaring its intent to vacate Agate Street and disposition of City owned property, lot 'C' of Tract 6846, and set the date of January 15, 1997, in the City Hall Council Chamber, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation or disposition of City owned property. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:dlw Attachments Exhibit "A" VICINITY MAP BANYAN STREET PROPOSED RTE 30 19TH STREET Z < HAMILITON STREET MIGNONETTE STREET BASE LINE ROAD > < Z .< AGATE STREET ' PROPOSED VACATION PROJECT LOCATION TR 15730 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Tract No. 15730 T.F.i;XgT Nr3. 8848 M8. ]2~. HAMILTON STREET N89'40'58 100,00' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION Map V- 139 AGATE STREET VACATION AND QUIT-CLAIM OF LOT 'C' EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO.' 6846 S89°40'58"W 654.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 43 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00°19'02"W 99.00 FEET'TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00" AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE N89°40'58"E 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C" S89°40'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" AFFACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~NXNETH G. OEIELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31198 EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: b '~ _~_HA__J~_ILT___O_N S_THEFT b NB9'40'58"E . S w .~R. LOT "C" L~T' C 1' WIDE UNE TRACT NO. 6846 30.00' b b (R) D = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = ,31.42' b T = 20.00' C) : C) C) C) Z S89'40'58"W 654.20'':b'' / I ALLARD ENGINEERING Civil Engineering Land Planning (909) 899-50%1 Fox 899-5014 6101 Cherry AYehue Fontcno, CA 92536 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. '6846 S89°40'58"W 594.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 42 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00019'02"W 99.00 FEET'TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00'' AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S89040'58"W 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N89°40'58"E 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~NETH G. Ot3ELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98 OF C EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: TRA~T Nr3. MB. ]2S, F'~x, EIE~ 44 b ,~ ~ _HA___MILT0 N STREET S89'40'58"W N_. QDi1.9 3)2 2 ~i / ~ (a) ~ D = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 31.42' T = 20.00' 4.=_.3 70.00' 30' E- SO~UTH LOT "C" / 1' WIDE LINE N89'40'58"E TRACT NO. 6846 ,50.00' b b (R) O = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 51.42' T = 20.00' 42 P.O.B. N.E. COR. LOT "C" NOO'19'O2"W 1.00' 70.00' 26C]~NJ S89'40'58"W 594. P.O.C. ~ S.E. COR. LOT 'C" SOUTHEAST TRACT NO. ALLARD ENGINEERING Civil Engineering Lend Planning (909) 899-5011 Fax 899-5014 610! Cherry Avenue Fontana, CA 92536 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ddnmm4 c.y & MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO Donald V. Moe 8993 Hamilton St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX I COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED, OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALF_ Sl(]netum of Declament or Agent deignTraining lax, FIrm Name Corporation Quitclaim Deed FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California hereby REMISES. RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Donald V. Moe the following described real propertyin the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF } S.S. On before me, a Notary Public ,n and for said County and State, personally appeared WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, City Engineer Assessor Parcel No. N/A FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP personally known Io me (or proved to me on the basis of sahsfactory evidence) to be th6 person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/lhey executed the Same in his/her/their authorized capacil'y(ies), and that by his/her/their stgnature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf ol which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Stgnature 37 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C", SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 S89°40'58"W 654.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVINGSAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C N89°40'58"E 30.OO FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 1.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S89°40'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~N~NETH G. ;SUELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98 XtV,9 ~',.~ la,, EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: 1"= 50' Y~I;ICY NrJ, 44 HAMILTON STREET b b N89'40'58']E 100.00' ~.0_0.2~,%02"w_/e-~ (R) / F-za O = 90'OO'OO' R = 20.00' b ~"~: L = 31.42' o T = 2O.0O' d O 0 ZH LOT "C" __,,, / l' WIDE Z,,;~,,~ 30' --,,,. (R) b D = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 51.42' T = 20.00' I f :oue¥o' "3"%%' o'~",, ~.~ _,-d~ 70.00' ' f ~ R6~:'20' ~ E.C.B.I 6K' E~" SOUTHEAST CORN RACT NO. 6846 43 <~ LOT "C" ALLARE) ENGINEERING DETAIL "A" U.T.S. Civil Engineerln9 Land Planning (909) 899-5011 Fax 899-5014- 5101 Cherry Av~nu~ Fontone. CA 92336 S00'19'02"E I.O0' /i:"' RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO cr~ & City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MAIL T~ STATEMENTS TO Daniel P. Odonnell 9015 Hamilton St. Alta Loma,CA 91701 L SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ __COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED. __OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND ENCUMeRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE. Signature of Declerant or Agent determining lax, Firm Name Corporation Quitclaim Deed FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. The City of Rancho Cucamonga. a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Daniel P. 6donnell the following described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino. State of California: EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B' AITACHED HERETO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNT~ OF On before me, a Notan/Public in and tot said County and Stale, personally appeared WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, City Engineer Assessot Parcel No. N/A FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP personally known to me (or proved to me on The basis of satisfactory ewdence) to be th6 person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged Io me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacit~ies), and that by his/her/their signature{s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity up,on behalf ot which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C", SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 889°40'58"W 594.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C S89°40'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 1.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE N89°40'58"E 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B"-ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~NZ'NETH G. 6'UELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31198 EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: YFMgT NrJ. Srj-'tS 44 HAMILTON STREET b b N89'40'58" ~O.O'LDiPj"_w_/' /'~ E (R~ D = 90'00'00" 30'iZ R = 20.00' b L = 31.42' o T = 20.00' 6 E 100.00' 30' b (R) O = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 31.4-2' T = 20.00' z 30(,,~/.] 1 j ' 58 '40;,~.';W"t"s89-40'58"w 594.20' ~' WIDE ~2 y S.E. CaR. TRACT NO. 6846 42 soo'~9'o~"E~,~ LOT r/} 89'4 '58"W 30.00' / NO ' ,02"W h189'40'58"E ,30.00'~ P.O.B. ALLARD ENGINEERING DETAIL "A" LSOETC,(,~R,,· T.. Civil Engineering Land Planning (909) 899-50]~ Fox 899-5014 6101 Cherry Avenu; F"ont~nc, CA 92336 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AGATE STREET AND THE DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT 'C' OF TRACT 6846 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 96-180 passed on December 18, 1996, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate Agate Street and disposition of City owned property by quitclaiming lot 'C' of Tract 6846, hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 PM on January 15, 1997, in the City Hall Council Chamber, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral, or written, to such vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 37350 and 37351 of the California Government Code, for the disposition of City owned property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby finds from all the evidence submitted that Agate Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating this street as shown on Map V-139, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in legal descriptions and plats which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit 'A' and 'B ' , respectively, and by this reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby finds that lot 'C' of Tract 6846 to be surplus and a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that the quitclaiming of said lot 'C' to the persons described in the quitclaim deeds will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3: That the subject vacation and quitclaiming shall be subject to the conditions of approval for Tract 15730, and the removals and construction thereof. RESOLUTION NO. VACATING AGATE STREET January 15, 1996 Page 2 SECTION 4: That the subject vacation and disposition of City owned property shall be subject to the reservations, exceptions, and abandonment, if any, for existing utilities on record, including the Cucamonga County Water Districts 6-inch water line in Agate Street which shall be removed and capped at Hamilton Street by the Developer of Tract 15730. SECTION 5: That the City Engineer is authorized to sign the Quitclaim Deed and to present same to the County Recorder, along with a certified copy of this Resolution, with attachments, to be filed for record, upon adoption of this Resolution, subject to the compliance, improvement and acceptance thereof with the above. SECTION 6: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. TRA~T Nrj. HAMILTON STREET N89'40'58 'a 100.00' 1-150,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION Map V- 139 AGATE STREET VACATION AND QUIT-CLAIM OF LOT 'C' EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129. PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 S89°40'58"W 654.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 43 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00°19'02"W 99.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00'' AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE N89°40'58"E 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C" S89°40'58"W 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~N~'NETH G. OUELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98 EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: 1" = 50' HAMILTON STREET b (~) N89'40'58"E b O = g0'00'00" 30' R = 20.00' L 31.42' b tb ~ T = 20.00' & - o~ 44 4._3 ~ ~ ~ P.O.B. o ]~ o LOT "C" o N00.19,92,.w ,~ o 1.00 b z 70.00' 30' 1 P.O.C. ~ ~ S.w. COR. LOT "C LOT "C" 1' WIDE LINE TRACT NO. 6846 30.00' (R) O = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 51.42' T = 20.00' 42 4'~ S89'40'58"W 654.2d;L'' ___.A ALLARD ENGINEERING Civil Engineering Land Planning (909) 899-5011 Fox 899-5014 6101 Cherry Avenue Fontono, CA 92336 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF AGATE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 6846 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "C" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846 S89°40'58"W 594.20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N00°19'02"W 1.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "C" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 42 AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846, N00°l 9'02"W 99.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00'' AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HAMILTON STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 6846; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S89°40'58"W 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AGATE STREET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S00°19'02"E 119.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C°'; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT "C" N89°40'58"E 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. K~N~NETH G. OISELLETTE P.L.S. 6124 EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/98 OF C kL\~%%~' EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: TFiAgT Nrj. aFj4r,a 44 b ,~ Gb_HA~MILTON b N'QP'l'gD22W"/' (R) O = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L 31.42' T = 20.00' 70.00' 30' STREET b I S89'40'58"W SO~UTH LOT "C" / 1' WIDE LINE N89'40'58"E TRACT NO. 6846 30.00' b (R) O = 90'00'00" R = 20.00' L = 31.42' b' T = 20.00' P.O.B. N.E. COR. LOT "C" N00'I9'02"W 1.00' 70.00' 6C]~N/ S89'40'58"W 594.20' P.O.C. ' S.E. COR. ALLARD ENGINEERING Civil Engineering Land Planning (909) 899-50ti Fox 899-5014 6101 Cherry Avenue Fontono. CA 92336 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SELECTION OF A NAME FOR THE NEW RECREATION ACTIVITY CENTER (OLD GEMCO BUILDING) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve naming the subject recreation facility one of these three names: "RC Family Sports Center", "Foothill Family Sports Center", or "Foothill Community Center" which are the names preferred by Members of the Park and Recreation Commission. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's new recreation facility, located at the old Gemco site is currently under design. On December 19, 1996 staff provided eleven suggested names to the Members of the Park and Recreation Commission (see attached staff report, dated December 19, 1996). The Park and Recreation Conunission reviewed the suggested names provided by staff and prefer the following three names listed in a priority order: 1. RC Family Sports Center 2. Foothill Family Sports Center 3. Foothill Community Center After a name for the new facility is approved by City Council, recommendation for individual room names at the facility will be provided for approval. Respectfully submitted, il City Engineer WJO:MO:dlw Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 19, 1996 Chair and Members of the Park and Recreation Commission William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Karen McGuire-EmerY, Associate Park Planner NAMING OF THE NEW RECREATION FACII,ITY I,OCATED 9059 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (THE OLD GEMCO BUII,DING) AT RECOMMENDATION That the Park and Recreation Commission review the suggested names and forward a preferred name to the Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee for their review and recommendation to the full City Council for approval. 3. 4. 6. BACKGROUND The City' s new recreation facility, located at the old Gemco site, is currently under design. Staff is providing the following list of suggested names for the new facility for the Commission' s review and selection of a preferred name. Recommendations for room names at the facility will follow at a later date. FOOTHILL COMMUNITY CENTER FOOTHILL FAMILY SPORTS CENTER RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS CENTER RC SPORTS CENTER RC FAMILY SPORTS CENTER RECREATION ACTIVITY CENTER (RAC) 7. CITY SPORTS CENTER 8. CITY FAMILY SPORTS CENTER 9. CITY SPORTS ZONE 10. SPORTS METRO 11. RC SPORTS METRO Respe t fully submitted, -,. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director CENTRAL PARK TASK FORCE BACKGROUND: At the December 18, 1996, City Council meeting, the City Council requested that City staff help define a membership for the Central Task Force. ANALYSIS: In order for the City Council to receive the most current input from the community, it will be necessary to form a Task Force Group that represents the full spectrum of community needs in the following activity areas: 2. 3. 4. 5. Youth/Adult Sports - 2 Senior Citizens - 2 Cultural / Arts - 2 General Public - 3 Commission / Council - 3 In addition, staff would suggest seeking, if available, members from the previous Task Force for historical purposes. A critical issue in forming this Task Force will be its ultimate membership size, too small, and its input is diminished and too large, the process can become too cumbersome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CENTRAL PARK TASK FORCE January 15, 1997 Page #2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend establishing a task force consisting of 12 members representing the range of community needs. Staff will prepare a list of potential members and their relationship to the community for your consideration. For general members, staff would suggest advertising in the local media and interviewing those interested in volunteering their help. Respectfully submitted, ( , Ric~ Gomez Community Development Director RG/js CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 15, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manag On January 14, 1997, the Route 30 Task Force convened in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. The meeting was artended by nine of the committee members. After approving the minutes the Task Force received and filed a Staff Report on property on Highland Avenue between Mayberry and Rock Rose. This issue had been agendized at two previous Task Force meetings and was included only to see if there was additional follow-up issues. Since there were none, it was received and filed. The Task Force was then presented with a Staff Report from SANBAG on the Environmental Impact Report Re-evaluation. The Task Force was informed the re-evaluation is going forward. A Consultant will be selected within the next month with the re-evaluation to follow. SANBAG also informed the Task Force the re-evaluation process should take approximately three to four months to complete. Status of Agreements, Acquisitions, funding, timing and phasing were presented by SANBAG. Freeway Agreements have been signed by Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga. It is expected that Upland will sign the Freeway Agreement within the next few weeks. Acquisition of properties is going forward in Los Angeles County and on the eastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga at the location of the Route 30/I-15 Interchange. SANBAG announced that funding has now been approved for all sections of the fleeway from the County line to Sierra Avenue in Fontana. It is anticipated the Freeway will begin at the I-15/30 Interchange and proceed westerly through Rancho Cucamonga. Next SANBAG reviewed the issues of sound wall design, retaining wall design and structure and aesthetic treatments for the Task Force. The SANBAG staff presented visuals depicting the various elements on the sound walls, retaining walls and structures. These issues have been processed through the Route 30 Corridor Design Group and will be submitted to SANBAG Board for approval. j MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL JACK LAM, AICP, CITY MANAGER ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE January 15, 1997 Page 2 SANBAG staff gave a report on Landscaping Design, indicating the Freeway will be in essence minimally landscaped. Caltrans will install landscaping at the I-15/30 Interchange in accordance with the plans approved by the Design Authority and the Rome 30 Task Force. The rest of the Freeway will be minimally landscaped, most notably with erosion control ground cover which will consist of native grasses. The Task Force asked when future landscaping might be approved. SANBAG replied this issue will be contingent upon funding and there are possibilities of receiving funding through Federal and State Programs, such as Environmental Mitigation. City staff, SANBAG and Caltrans all indicated they will be active in the future in trying to obtain these funds. The Task Force also inquired as to whether or not provisions would be made for future water connections. SANBAG informed them landscaping installed with the Freeway will be irrigated. Provisions will be made for future irrigation by installing connections and provisions at freeway over-ramps and other crossings. However, piping for future irrigation along the freeway will not be installed at this time but will be installed with future projects. The Task Force discussed future meetings and the motion was made and approved to have the next meeting be in sixty days. The Task Force also requested that some report be presented on the Park parking issue at a future meeting. The Task Force also requested as information is available, it be provided to the Task Force and the staff not wait sixty days to provide them with this information. Staff will continue to provide the Task Force with information on a timely basis. WJO:dlw cc: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director