The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997/02/05 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st m~d 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. February 5, 1997 Civic Center Council Chmnbers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tent Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Lain, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attontey Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda February 5, 1997 All items submitted forthe City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: AlexandeGrutierr~z Biane , Curatalo , and Williams __ = B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of February 17, 1997 as PTA Week in Rancho Cucamonga in commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the forming of the PTA. Presentation of Proclamation to Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, for his many years of service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: December 11, 1996 (Curatalo absent) December 18, 1996 January 15, 1997 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/31/96, 1/8/97 and 1/15/97; and Payroll ending 1/9/97 for the total amount of $2,768,530.53. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Rocky's New York Style Pizzeria, Lisa and Marcello Hernandez, Aurea Pompa, Augusto Reyes and Jenaro Tinio, 9615 Foothill Boulevard. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for B & J's, Patrick Joseph Mallen, 9653-55 Base Line Road. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Sunrize Liquor, Gharat B. Patel, 8679 Base Line Road. 11 13 15 City Council Agenda February 5, 1997 Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Almond Street a~d Storm Drain Improvements, located at the southwest corner of Almond Street and Henry Street, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 32-4637-9530. RESOLUTION NO. 97-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND HENRY STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS o Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Arrow Route Street improvements at Deer Creek Channel, located between Hermosa and Center Avenues, to be funded from Community Development Prop. 111, Account No. 10-4637-9607. RESOLUTION NO. 97-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HERMOSA AND CENTER AVENUES, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of Point of Historic Interest 96-02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - an application to designate the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, as a Point of Historic Interest - APN: 209-085-04. RESOLUTION NO. 97-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES, INC. THEATER, LOCATED AT 10071 FERON BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORICAL POINT OF INTEREST - APN: 209-085-04 o 10. Approval of City Policy to Recognize High School Students for Outstanding Citizenship and Service to the Community. Approval of a request from Chapter One of the CalifOrnia Association of School Transportation Officials to waive rental fees for a School Bus Roadeo at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. 17 19 23 25 29 56 58 60 City Council Agenda February 5, 1997 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Conditional Use Permit No. 96-14, located within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center on the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RESOLUTION NO. 97-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-14 Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 97-002) for the Traffic Signals and Street Improvements at Base Line Road and East Avenue, in the amount of $201,080.00 ($182,800.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-4637-9203. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 97-003) for fie Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, in the amount of $150,782.00 ($137,075.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Development Transportation Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22-4637-9513. Approval of Fund Transfer and Authorize the Continuance of Computer Support Services (AEF, CO 96-050). Approval to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Matedal Bonds for Tract 13298, generally located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond #229499S Labor and Matedal Bond #229499S $ 32,600.00 16,300.00 Approval to accept Contract No. CO96-016, the Ninth Street Improvement Project, located between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street, funded from CDBG Funds, Account 28-4333-9316, approve the final contract amount of $198,041.00, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 97-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONTRACT NO. CO96-016, THE NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 63 65 66 70 73 74 75 76 City Council Agenda February 5, 1997 4 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE GROUP CATEGORIES FOR CHURCHES FROM CATEGORY 5 (RESIDENT/COMMERCIAL) TO CATEGORY 3 (RESIDENT/NON- PROFIT WITH PAID MANAGEMENT) RESOLUTION NO. 96-012A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.0 - RECREATION FEES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION BY REVISING GROUP CATEGORIES FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS FROM CATEGORY 5 TO CATEGORY 3 77 79 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda February 5, 1997 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. REPORT ON THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL INFORMATION SIGNS ON POLES (Continued from January 15, 1997) 2. REVIEW OF ZONE CHANGE POLICIES FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 3. (A) REPORT ON THE SELECTION PROCESS OF VENDORS USED BY THE CITY (B) APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACT (CO 96-060) FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE MAINTENANCE WITH WESTEK COMPUTER SERVICES INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,867.00 TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4161-6028 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 4. DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME ACCORD 5. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE 81 84 87 95 104 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; VALLEY BASEBALL AND JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 30, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. December 11, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Meetin.Q A. CALL TO ORDER A spedal meeling of the Rancho Cucamonga City Coundl and Planning Commission was held on Wednesday, December 11, 1996, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:06 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Planning Commissioners: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy and Chairman E. David Barker. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Chief L. Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was: Councilmember James Curatalo B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS OF MUTUAL INTEREST Mayor Alexander stated a commitment was made for both bodies to get together and talk and that is why everyone was here today. Councilmember Biane stated it was his impression the agenda would list more specific topics for discussion because of the discussion that took place at the last Council meeting. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he hoped they could talk about the General Plan, and specifically Foothill Boulevard, 4th Street and areas on the east side of town regardless of which plan it falls under to make sure that the City is moving in the same direction. He stated he hoped to find out what the City's timing is on these issues. He stated he did not feel it was appropriate to hold up on any zoning changes until this is resolved. He felt there were some areas where growth should continue and some areas where growth should stop. He stated it may be where the General Plan does not need to change at all. He indicated he would like a deadline or a time line as to when these changes will be made. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1996 Page 2 Mayor Alexander stated he had sent out a memo in June regarding the General Plan and wanted to make sure everyone had seen it. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if the Planning Commission had had any special meetings to discuss the General Plan. Chairman Barker stated they had not had any special workshops, but have discussed projects on Foothill which involved the General Plan. He felt the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan should also be looked at. He felt there were some words in the Plan that could be deleted, i.e. "Industrial". He stated the Planning Commission has a workshop scheduled to take a field tdp to better view this area. Councilmember Guljerrez felt the entire Foothill Boulevard area should be looked at, and felt there should be a subcommittee of the City Council and Planning Commission to work on this with a report to come back in February or March. He stated he was also concerned about economic development and felt this should be looked at. He felt Etjwanda, north of Base Line, should be totally residential, and hoped this could be discussed in January. He felt now was the time to start planning for the next four or five years what the future will be. Mayor Alexander suggested that signage should be looked at and improved upon because it was difficult to locate a business. He felt this might also help the businessman. He also felt other land uses should be looked at and stated he did not agree with multifamily residential. Commissioner Tolstoy inquired if the Mayor also wanted to change the zoning for multifamily residential. Mayor Alexander replied yes. Commissioner Tolstoy inquired if Councilmember Gutierrez was wanting to make the zones less dense. Councilmember Gutierrez replied yes. Chairman Barker suggested Brad Buller, City Planner, give a bdef overview of the legal requirements to change the General Plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated every City in the State of California is required to have a General Plan. He stated every General Plan is required to have a Housing Element, and every Housing Element is reviewed by a mul~tude ofjurisdicljons who are asking "are you in fact carrying your responsible fair share for meeting what California is supposed to be providing as far as mix of housing". He stated the mix of housing does several things to bdng about a balanced community. He stated you want the type of housing to bring about the type of business you want in your City. He felt there were certain businesses that are looking for a range of housing because their employment types are such they would like to find housing, such as apartments, for a specific salary range for their employees. He stated the General Plan tries to outline in broad terms a housing strategy. He stated there is also a certain amount of money set aside for certain types of housing under the Redevelopment Law. He stated all of this together makes up a general direction for the City's housing and zoning. He stated the last time the Council looked at housing mix, the original General Plan called for about a 55/45 percent mix, which means 55% of the housing stock when built out would be single family detached. The other 45% would be attached. He pointed out the City's philosophy was at one time pretty high on the attached end of housing. He stated when this analysis was done, they pointed out that the City was about at 60/40 and the Council said they would like to be at 75/25, which is more consistent with other cities in the State of California. He stated toward that end it went through a sweep of General Plan hearings both through the Commission and the Council and adopted some zone changes that brought about some redesignations or rezoning of property. He stated it is not unusual for cities to study their General Plan, and that the last time Rancho Cucamonga did this, it took two of his staff, full time, almost six months to complete the work on this. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes December 11,1996 Page 3 Mayor Alexander asked if there was a way for neighboring cities to "share' the housing mix requirements if one has an over abundance of one type of housing over another. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there have been discussions at SCAG and at the League of Cities to revise the housing element requirements. He stated under present law, there are very narrow circumstances where a City can actually share their low cost housing money with neighboring cities. He stated as of today, the housing element law does not allow you to look to neighbors to meet your fair share for your housing requirements. Councilmember Biane stated in trying to attract white collar workers, businesses are finding that current distribution fadlitjes and their techniques they use require fewer employees than when the City's General Plan was put in place as far as its balanced element between industrial, retail and otherwise, and asked if this would possibly affect the City's projected housing needs. He stated that was something else to consider for changes to the housing element as the business environment changes. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they are considering the types of businesses in the City as it relates to planning the type of housing needed for the City. Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out that because of the size of the City's industrial area, it is desirable to have adequate housing for the various levels of employees. He felt this was very important. He stated that comments from previous businesses moving into the City found this concept appealing because the idea of having an employee base is what they were looking for. Councilmember Williams stated this is one of the City's marketing tools when they are looking for industrial/manufacturing tenants. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he would like direction from the Council if they would like for staff to bring them and the Commission back information on how they are progressing with the housing mix through a memorandum. He stated he would then touch base with the Council and Commission for their input if they felt it was time for another meeting to talk about this issue a little further. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the staff does a good job at marketing the City. He added he is concerned that people are getting treated well at the City and that possibly a subcommittee of the City Council and Planning Commission should work on this. He felt the City should be very friendly and pro business. He commented he would also like to see a subcommittee for economic development and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as was previously discussed. Mayor Alexander felt this could be looked at on December 18 when the Council discusses the subcommittee appointments and suggested the Planning Commission could select someone at one of their future meetings. Chairman McNiel suggested that possibly some of these topics brought up could be combined into one subcommittee. Chairman Barker pointed out that the Council had brought up the issues of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, economic development, mule-family/residential and sign ordinances, and felt these issues should be prioritized so that the Planning staff will know what to look at first so they can schedule their staff to look at all of these subjects. Councilmember Biane agreed and felt Brad Buller should get the City Council information on the cost and the staff time involved to go through this entire process. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the scope of everything should be identified including a time frame and cost, put in prior'~ order so that everything gets accomplished. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes December 11,1996 Page 4 Commissioner McNiel felt there should be a subcommittee of both bodies identified to work on the issues brought up. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that two members of the City Council and Planning Commission meet before the Planning Commission's January 22, 1997 meeting to figure out how this process will take place. The Council concurred it would be very helpful to discuss signage throughout the City. Commissioner McNiel stated he agreed that sandwich board signs really do help to promote business° Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he felt theirs were some shopping center owners that would not allow sandwich board signs to be placed by their tenants. Commissioner Barker felt an overall philosophy of the sign ordinance should be given to the City Council first. Councilmember Biane felt there was enough direction given to Brad Buller so he could discuss this at the Planning Commission's January 22, 1997 meeting. Coundlmember Williams wanted to clarify what exactly was meant by economic development - was everyone referring to be more business friendly or that the counter help at City Hall needed to get customer service training. Councilmember Biane stated he did see where there needed to be a subcommittee to discuss this first. Coundlmember Gu~jerrez stated he felt the Council and Planning Commission really do need to work together as in returning phone calls and better communication in general. He pointed out there would be some tough times ahead and wanted to work together with the Planning Commission. C. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. Commissioner Tolstoy stated at the last meeting the Planning Commission got direction from the Council not to drop standards. He stated the Commission would be discussing standards with Lewis Homes at their meeting tonight and wanted to make sure this was still the Council's desire. Councilmember Williams stated she did not think standards should be lowered, but that economic times should also be considered which would allow for more flexibility by the Planning Commission. Mayor Alexander stated the Planning Commission has made developer's successful because of the standards set in Rancho Cucamonga. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes December 11,1996 Page 5 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Barker to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent). The meeljng adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved by Planning Commission: January 8, 1997 Approved by City Council: * December 18, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetin.a A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 18, 1996, in tie Coundl Chambem of tie Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:16 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Offidal; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sandy Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Administration of Oath of Office to Jim Frost, City Treasurer, by Mayor William Alexander. Mayor Alexander administered the oath of office to recently re-elected City Treasurer Jim Frost. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, stated he enjoyed working with everyone and serving the community. B2. Presentalien of Proclamation to Rancho Cucamonga Pop Warner Football Panthers recognizing their 1996 Mt. Baldy Conference Championship. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Steve Wilkerson, President of Pop Warner. Mr. Wilkerson pointed out that the grade point average of the team is 3.1 and what a great job they did this season. Coach Mike tianked the Council for this recognition and also thanked the team, other coaches, team rooms, cheerleaders and parents for their dedication and support this season. Mr. Wilkerson also thanked Jerry Fulwood and Joe O'Neil for their work they did on the fields they were able to use. He also presented them with plaques. Hats, patches tee shirts were also given to the Councilmembers. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 2 Mr. Lansdale also congratulated the team and encouraged them to keep up the good work. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communica~ons were made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that Items D17 should be removed from the agenda, but that it would come back at a future meeting date. D1. Approval of Minutes: October 16, 1996 November 6, 1996 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/27/96 and 12/04/96; and Payroll ending 11/28/96 for the total amount of $2,535,031.90. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1996. D4. Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Am/Pm Mini Market, Prestige Stations Inc., northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive. D5. Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Taco Factory, Raquel Guillen, 10709 Town Center Drive, Suite 110. D6. Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Foothill Market, Anwar and Werken Innabi, 8161 West Foothill Boulevard. D7. Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Salsa Fresh Mexican Grill, Marvin and Brenda Ann Plotkin, 9000 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 102. D8. Alcoholic Beverage License for On-Sale Beer and Wine for China Star Restaurant, Lee Chung Lam, 9638 Base Line Road. D9. Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Mobil, Daniel and Kathy Lee Reshaw, 9315 Base Line Road. D10. Approval of three month budget (April 1, 1996 - June 30, 1996) for Recreation Activity Center (former Gemco building) in the amount of $131,230.00 (Fund 134). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. D11. Approval of City Insurance Indemnification D12. Approval of the Disposition of City owned property (Jasper Street) adjacent to Lot 22 of Tract 14072 - Diversified Pacific Homes. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 96-173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD D13. Approval to release Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 6239 Archibald Avenue, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Lemon Avenue, requested by Lester A. And Rebecca A. Davies (APN 201-251-21) RESOLUTION NO. 96-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT WITH LESTER A. AND REBECCA A. DAVIES D14. Approval to execute contract (CO 96-060) for computer hardware maintenance with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867.00 to be funded from Contract Services Account Number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 1996/97. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, ordering the summary vacation of five feet of excess right-of-way along Main Street and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 1 and Street Lighljng Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 2 for Development Review No. 95-21, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by the North Town Housing Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 96-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-21 RESOLUTION NO. 96-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF FIVE FEET OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG MAIN STREET RESOLUTION NO. 96-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-21 City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 4 D16. Approval of the Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and setting the public headng date for the vacation of Agate Street and disposition of City owned property by quitclaiming Lot "C" of Tract 6846, for Tract No. 15730, generally located at the northwest corner of Beryl and Mignonette Streets, submitted by DPDC Rancho 45/Ltd., a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 96-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15730, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 96-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15730 RESOLUTION NO. 96-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AGATE STREET AND DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C" OF TRACT 6846 D17. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material nond (Railroad Crossings) for Parcel Map No. 12959-1 (Capellino Brothers). Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 223,095.67 Labor and Material Bond 111,547.84 MOTION: Moved by William, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the excepljon of Items D10, D14 and D17. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D10. Approval of three month budget (April 1, 1996 - June 30, 1996) for Recreation Activity Center (former Gemco building) in the amount of $131,230.00 (Fund 134). Councilmember Williams stated she was confused about the dates. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the dates should be 1997 instead of 1996. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Item D10. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D14. Approval to execute contract (CO 96-060) for computer hardware maintenance with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867.00 to be funded from Contract Services Account Number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 1996~97. Councilmember Williams asked if this was part of the system purchased a long period of time ago and thought the maintenance was to be included in this. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 5 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this maintenance contract is to include anything outside of warranty items. Councilmember Williams asked if it might not be cheaper to purchase new equipment rather than keep on with maintenance contracts for the old equipment. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is done at budget time, and that equipment is evaluated at that time to see if new equipment should be purchased or not. Councilmember Williams asked what the money for each item covers, if there is any kind of preventative maintenance (cleaning etc.) done, even if there are no repairs needed during the year. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is preventative maintenance done each year. Councilmember Williams asked for a little more detail to be included in the report next year when this comes up for approval. She asked at what time the City should be going out for a formal bid process for other companies that might be interested. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Purchasing Department goes out and gets an idea of what the prices are out in the field and if the contract is pretty close to what is being quoted in the market, and the contractor is effective and doing a good job, then we continue with that contract. He pointed out if we have problems with the contractor or find the pdces deviate from what the market is, then we go out to bid. Coundlmember Williams stated she would like a little more information on the contracting and the bidding for this in order to make a decision. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated an information report can be provided to the Council about this process. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, stated they were hoping to approve the contract tonight, but they could go on a time and materials basis in the meantime. He added the contract has expired. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like a summary of every vendor in the City that the City is involved with. He felt there were some vendors out there that needed to be included in the process. Councilmember Williams stated she would like to see more information on this before she votes on the contract. Councilmember Biane asked at what level does the City need to go out for competitive bidding - the value of any contract. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated $15,000, but that this is not required to be done every year, that it can be done as he had explained previously by comparing a contract with the market rates. He added staff would be happy to provide more information to the Council in an informational report. Councilmember Williams stated she has noticed on the warrants there are computer expenses and stated she wondered why this is and also felt maybe there might be local people who can do the work. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to go on a time and materials basis for one month until more information can be submitted back to the Council in order to approve the contract. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 6 No items were submitted. No items were submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS (Continued from December 4, 1996) Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Councilmember Curatalo stated he felt at the last meeting they had decided to extend the Planning Commission terms. He felt the options presented did not do this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it depends on what period you are extending. He stated the actual Ordinance period ends in January of odd numbered years, so that this coming January there would be three Commissioners' terms that are up under the Ordinance. He added that the Council by minute action had extended that. He stated the Council now has a number of options in which to choose from. He continued to outline what the various options would accomplish. He felt Option 3 would accomplish what Councilmember Biane was wanting to do. Councilmember Biane stated he felt Option 3 was his first choice. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt it was a great meeting with the Planning Commission last week and that a lot was accomplished. He stated he did not want to give them a message that their terms would be cancelled in January or mid-1997. He felt 1998 would be a good time to do the interviews. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see politics left out of this and would go along with Option 3. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to go with Option 3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Option 3, Ordinance No. 567. ORDINANCE NO. 567 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 567 for January 15, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 7 G2. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH SPEED LIMITS OF 55 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE, 50 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM 1-15 TO ETIWANDA AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO HAVEN AVENUE. 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO I-15, AND 50 MPH ON ARROW ROUTE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 568. ORDINANCE NO. 568 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading for January 15, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items were submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Mayor Alexander asked if there was anyone that wanted to change any of their Subcommittees. Councilmember Biane stated he wanted to thank Councilmember Williams and Mayor Alexander for all of their work on the Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee since they had been meeting twice a month. He suggested that maybe these meetings should be held with the whole Council because of the importance of the issues discussed. Coundlmember Williams felt there were a lot of stadium issues to be discussed and wondered if there should be a body to oversee the stadium, like a stadium authority. James Markman, City Attorney, stated if you get three or more Councilmembers involved in this, it would be like a regular Council meeting. He stated if there is something the whole Council should discuss, then it should be placed on the regular Council agenda. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 8 Councilmember Williams felt there should be another category on the agenda to discuss stadium issues. Councilmember Biane stated he would like to put these types of items on the regular Council agenda for everyone to discuss. Coundlmember Williams suggested the Subcommittee be put on hold for awhile and that a sec~on be added on the Council agenda to discuss Park and Recreation Facilities issues. The Council concurred with this suggestion. The Council continued to go through the list of Subcommittees. (A finalized list of the Subcommittee appointments is attached for reference) Councilmember Biane mentioned the appointment of two Councilmembers to work with the Planning Commission on the issues identified at the joint meeting recently held. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out these would be ad hoc committees. ACTION: The Coundl concurred that for the FoothillEconomic Development Ad Hoc Committee the members would be Biane and Williams; and for the Multi-Family/Sign Ad Hoc Committee the members would be Gutierrez and Alexander. 12. DISCUSSION OF FORMING TASK FORCE TO REVIEW CENTRAL PARK Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to set up a Task Force like what was done for Route 30. Councilmember Williams stated she liked both options and felt all of the people that previously served on the Central Park Task Force should be invited to come back, but at the same time go ahead and advertise for new members since some of the old Task Force members are no longer around. She did not think they should start from scratch and felt the experience of some of the old members would be very valuable. She inquired of Mayor Alexander what his thoughts were of the size of the Task Force. Mayor Alexander stated not any larger than the Route 30 Task Force was. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to be involved in the Central Park Task Force and would like to be on it. Councilmember Williams felt the whole Council should be involved in the discussion of this matter, and that it should not just be a Subcommittee of the City Council. James Markman, City Attorney, stated they could have a Task Force which could report back to the whole City Council as another option. Councilmember Biane felt it was good to go out to the whole community to get their input on this matter. He also felt it would be good for the whole City Council to be involved on the Task Force. Mayor Alexander stated he liked the Task Force concept and felt it worked very well for the Route 30 Freeway issue. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated if the Council concurred, he would bring a report back at the January 15, 1997 Council meeting with suggestions for the setting up of the Task Force. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 9 ACTION: The Council concurred with the suggestion made by Rick Gomez. 13. DISCUSSION OF DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Councilmember Curatalo stated since he put this on the agenda he has learned new information about contribution limits. He continued to read his memorandum in the agenda packet changing the second line in the last paragraph to read "all campaign contributions from any person or organization seeking City approval or any item pending or approved within the past year". He stated because of Prop 208 the amount in his memorandum is not needed. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what does Prop 208 say. Councilmember Curatalo stated the contribution limit is at $250. James Markman, City Attomey, stated Prop 208, which was adopted in November, is something people ought to take a look at. He stated for a City like Rancho Cucamonga it limits contributions by any person to $250. He stated this can be doubled if the City Council adopts an ordinance which limits the total amount of money which may be spent by any candidate running for City office, and a candidate volunteers to live within that limitation, that candidate can then take $500 a person. He stated the amounts vary depending on if it is a state office, local office, etc. He stated they will be giving the Council a report to see if they want to do something with the overall expenditure limitation. He added that legislalive counsel points out that several of the provisions found in Prop 208 have previously been invalidated by courts around the Country, so they are waiting for the litigation to ensue to straighten out Prop 208 also. He pointed out that the $1,000 limit in Councilmember Curatalo's memo becomes invalid because someone can only give them $250. Councilmember Biane stated he is not clear about Prop 208 and did not think he had enough information to vote on anything at this time. Councilmember Gutierrez stated what he hears Councilmember Curatalo saying is that he would like for the Council to disclose contributions at a Council meeting in addition to putting the information in their campaign reports. Councilmember Gutierrez stated if that is the intent, why not make the limit $50 or $99 and then the public would know exactly who is funding campaigns. He felt there were plenty of ways to skirt around whatever limit is set, but felt if this is what everyone wants, why not disclose all contributions and be up front with everything so people would know who is behind campaigns. James Markman, City Attorney, added Prop 208 states a City of under 100,000 has a limit of $100 to be accepted from any one person. He pointed out a contribution of $99 is not even disclosable. Mayor Alexander stated he felt the reporting that is done now is appropriate. He felt if something like this is going to be done, the Council should disclose aggregate amounts also. Councilmember Curatalo stated he wants to take the burden off of the public having to research the campaign disclosure information and to bring the information to them. Mayor Alexander felt Prop 208 should be researched more to see how it will affect Councilmember Curatalo's memorandum. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 10 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to offer within the next year a version of campaign finance reform so that money that is contributed towards a Council campaign be exclusively from the City and that no more than $100 from an individual or $200 to $250 from a company or organization is received. He also felt that no employee unions that get paid and are dependent upon their salary and benefits through the Council's vote be allowed to contribute to their campaigns, He felt any Councilmember that is very close to someone that is in an employee union not be allowed to vote on salary and benefits. Coundlmember Williams stated she felt the Council does comply with FPPC requirements and stated she has seen people excuse themselves from a vote because they had received funds from them. She asked the staff to get more information and bring it back to the Council. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded Biane to table the issue and bring it back when it is more appropriate time after more information is available. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Mayor Alexander called a recess at 8:58 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:11 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 14. DISCUSSION OF UTILITY USERS FEE AND PROPOSITION 218 (Oral) James Markman, City Attorney, presented information stating that in order to put the utility tax on the ballot, it will have to be done at a regular election date of the City Council unless it is declared an emergency, then it could go sooner. He stated it must be approved by a unanimous vote of the Council to declare it an emergency. He added it would have to be approved, under Prop 62, by a four-fifths vote of the Council to put the matter on the ballot, but that the Council could always go to the voters for an advisory vote. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated if you were to have an election out of the Prop 218 process, you would also have the disclosure requirements for any financial dealings you would have. He stated once you do this you would not have any unqualified opinions regarding those financings, He stated either you are not going to be able to do a financing or the rating goes down so low that your financing is so expensive because there is tremendous debt to the bond holders, and that the income stream suppoding the financing would not be valid. James Markman, City Attorney, stated that the people can always put this on the ballot through an initiative process. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he appreciates what staff does and that what he does is what he thinks is the best thing for the City. He stated he has no problem putting this on the ballot for the people to decide. He stated if he could get a reassurance that the Jarvis people would not sue the City no matter what the outcome of the election, he would want to put it to a vote now. He felt the people should have their chance to exercise their right to vote on this matter and felt it should be done as soon as possible. Coundlmember Williams felt the City can be creative and felt they should not wait to put it on the ballot. She felt there are so many inconsistencies that the City should go ahead with the election. She felt the people should have the chance to vote on this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the way he reads Prop 218 the only taxes required to be submitted were those enacted after January 1, 1995, and added it is silent on the City's tax. He stated one could very easily interpret Prop 218 as having constitutionally validated the City's tax which was enacted almost four years ago. He stated it isn't even in the category that Prop 218 is saying should be submitted to the voters. He felt this was City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 11 a very viable interpretation. He felt the court could very well say that all taxes enacted after Prop 62 when all the turmoil was going on with those cases in the court of appeals, prior to January 1,1995, are grandfathered by Prop 218. He stated this argument is now being made in the Butte County case. Councilmember Williams stated she feels it should go to a vote as soon as possible. Councilmember Curatalo felt it would be dishonest to declare it an emergency and did not think the Council should put it on the ballot at this time, Coundlmember Biane felt it should go to a vote as soon as is legally possible. He felt the people should have the right to vote and that it should be done right away. Mayor Alexander stated no one likes taxes, He stated he would not cast a vote to put the utility tax on the ballot. He stated he is not willing to sacrifice law enforcement, fire services, graffiti removal, etc. He stated if the people say they do not want him in office, he will go on his way, but that he would not relinquish his responsibility by agreeing to this. He stated the City cannot respond to the public's needs without taxes. He stated he is angry with the state officials who never come to the local level except at election time. He added he is not in favor of putting this on the ballot at this time. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Dennis Bishop, resident, had a prepared statement he read which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. He concluded by stating he did not feel the City needed the money and that the voters should decide the matter in 1998. Mr. Lanedale, resident, felt the City will be looking at a lawsuit if they wait for two more years to put this on the ballot and that it should go on the ballot as soon as possible. Gary Kendrick, resident, felt the people should have a vote on the utility tax. He stated the Jarvis people told him Prop 218 allows them to put this on the ballot. He stated he might put this on the ballot through the initiative process. Donald Martin stated he was present to talk to the Council about something he had talked to Councilmember Guljerrez about, and that was the children of the City. He stated he would like to see something done to help the children. He added he would like to see something done to help parents so they can talk to their children and bring everyone together. John Lyons, 11984 Dorset, stated he supported the utility tax when it was approved. He stated the utility fax helps suppert the law enforcement to fight gangs. He stated last night the City really saw the need for the fire department. He felt the Council has made a commitment for a phase-out program and liked that idea instead of eliminating it altogether. Primo Morales, 8210 Malvern, stated he would rather pay for the utility tax and not have his quality of life deteriorate. He felt the phase-out program will do what is intended. He felt reassured to know we have emergency services. Marlin Luterez, resident, stated he did not mind paying a little extra for emergency services, but felt the City should look closer at the finances. He did not feel a vote should be rushed into. There being no further input, the public comments were closed. ACTION: No action taken. City Council Minutes December 18, 1996 Page 12 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to discuss the way the City contracts with all of its vendors and would like to go through the bid list. He stated he would like to be able to say to people that the City is doing the best thing because they do want everyone to compete. J2. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he would like to review the City's regulations on small signs on poles, street lamps and street signs. He felt people should be responsible about puffing these up. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Mr. Martin stated he has contacted the television companies about taking the shows that are not very good off of TV and asked the Council if they can help. Mayor Alexander stated they would certainly look into this. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he would like to respond to some of the comments made on the utility tax and Prop 218. He stated the utility tax was approved because of a lot of things that were enacted. He stated it was not only because of state take-aways, but that the City needed more police protection, and that part of the money was to pay for this. He stated it was also to fund 12 officers in 1993 and also a second DARE officer. He stated it took care of the NPDES mandate and the backfill of property taxes from the Fire Department. He stated the Coundl made a commitment that when it became healthy again, the tax would be phased out, which has started. He continued by correcting some of Mr. Bishop's comments made earlier. He agreed with Mr. Bishop that the City is in a healthier financial position than it was back then. He stated it is the City's goal to keep the funds healthy to provide the services for the City. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Secton 54956.8 for property located on Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parties; regarding terms of payment. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:26 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: "ATTACHMENT TO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF 12-18-96" CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS As Desiclnated from December 18, 1996 City Council MeetinQ The following is a brief synopsis of each of the Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions. BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALITION (CLOUT) Provides a program of action for the public and pdvate sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area-wide importance. Meets the fourth Thursday of each month, 7:30 a.m., Ontario Marriott Hotel DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE The City Selection Committee is made up of all of the Mayors for San Bernardino County and its purpose is to select elected representatives to various bodies which include: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and the Air Quality Management District. The regular meeting of the committee is held on the last working day of April of every even numbered year at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino in conjunction with SANBAG agenda business starting at 9:30 a.m. Mayor is Representative AB 939 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE This is a state mandated task force created by San Bernardino County and is made up of the Board of Supervisors, elected representatives from each City within San Bernardino County and 10 non-elected representaWes. The purpose of the task force is to coordinate the development of the County and City's Source Reduc'don and Recycling Elements and to coordinate a cost effective regional solid waste management system. Meets on a Quarterly Basis; the Third Thursday of Each Month from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Fisk Auditorium of the San Bernardino County Museum. DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Alexander AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE Provides liaison with the South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality issues. Meets as Needed at the AQMD Headquarters in Diamond Bar DELEGATE: Gutierrez ALTERNATE: Alexander CABLE TELEVISION SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the cable television franchises and to develop the public access portion of the franchise agreement. Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Curatalo and Biane City Council, Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as designated from December 18, 1996 Page 2 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE Provides liaison between the Chamber of Commerce and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating projects and items of mutual interest. Meets Second Wednesday of Each Month at the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber office DELEGATE: Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE Monitors the activities of the Foundation and items of mutual interest. Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Biane ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/FOOTHILL BLVD. TASK FORCE Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to discuss and recommend to Coundl a course of action for reassessment of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor from both a land use and economic development perspective. Meets as needed. DELEGATES: Williams and Biane FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Reviews employment eligibility lists prior to certification and other related personnel matters. Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center in accordance with Fire Department Rules and Regulations DELEGATES: Alexander and Biane HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE Reviews affordable housing needs and develops strategy and programs for agency set-aside money. Meets first Tuesday of February at 8:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Alexander and Gutierrez INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES The Inland Empire League is one of fifteen divisions within the League of California Cities and functions as an "arm" of cities. The League also provides training, legislative tracking, and research for associate cities. Meets monthly and/or quarterly as needed; location changes each month DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Curatalo City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 18, 1996 Page 3 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - ECONOMIC, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING SUBCOMMITTEE Reviews and discusses statewide policy and legislation affecting these topics. Meets quarterly on the 2nd Friday of the month; location changes DELEGATE: Biane LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE Provides a liaison on library issues. Meets the first Tuesday of February at 9:00 a.m. and as needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center. DELEGATES: Alexander and Gutierrez MOBILE HOME ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the Citys Mobile Home Accord and contract negotiations. The Accord is a contract between the owners of the City's mobile home parks and the City and addresses rent stabilization for the mobile home parks. Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:00 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Alexander and Gutierrez ALTERNATE: Biane MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTISIGNAGE TASK FORCE Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to review sign ordinance. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Alexander and Gutierrez OMNITRANS OMNITRANS is a Joint Powers Agreement which coordinates the busing needs of its associate cities. Meets the first Wednesday of each month at Omnitrans Headquarters in San Bernardino at 8:00 a.m. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams City Council, Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as designated from December 18, 1996 Page 4 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the construction of park and recreation facilities and items of mutual concern. Council determined that whole Council should review subject matter on an interim one year basis to determine future direction of Subcommittee. Meets first and third Wednesdays at 5:00 p.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams PUBLIC SAFETY SUBCOMMITTEE Provides a liaison for public safety issues. Meets the first Tuesday of February at 10:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Curatalo PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for public works projects throughout the City. (Law Enforcement Subcommittee combined with this subcommittee.) Meets first Tuesday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Biane REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the marketing of the City and reviews agency marketing budget. (Regional Mall Subcommittee combined with this subcommittee.) Meets first Tuesday of February at 9:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Biane ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Created August 3, 1994 in response to residents' desire for input into the Route 30 Corridor. Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Tri- Communities Conference Room. DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 18, 1996 Page 5 ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR DESIGN JPA Created January 19, 1994 to address Route 30 Corridor concerns for both San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties. Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m., meeting site rotates. DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo ALTERNATE: Alexander SAN BAG SANBAG is the regional planning authority of which the City participates in through a Joint Powers Agreement. Meets the first Wednesday of each month at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino at 9:30 aom. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - REGIONAL COUNCIL SCAG is an assodalion of County and City governments and is a Council of Governments (COG). The purpose of such councils is to provide a forum where members can reach agreement on issues of common concern and develop regional planning approaches. Meets 1st Thursday of each month, and Annual meeting held in March of each year; location changes (the last two years meetings were held in Brea) DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Biane SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - SOLID WASTE SUBCOMMITTEE Discusses regional solid waste issues. Meets 1st Tuesday of the month; location changes. DELEGATE: Biane SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Discusses regional community and economic development policy. Meets 1st Thursday of each month; location changes. DELEGATE: Alexander PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Coundl Subcommittees for these Commissions conduct the interviews for the expired terms and vacancies as they occur and provide liaison for items of mutual interest. Park & Recreation PlanninglHPC DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams DELEGATES: Gutierrez and Biane COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS December 18, 1996 Alexander Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT) City Selection Committee Fire District Personnel Committee Housing Set Aside Subcommittee Library Subcommittee Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee Multi-Family Development/Signage Task Force Omnitrans Park and Recreation Commission Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force SANBAG SCAG Regional Council SCAG Community & Economic Development Subcommittee AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Route 30 Corridor Design JPA DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Alternate Alternate Biane AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Cable Television Subcommittee Community Foundation Subcommittee Economic Development/Foothill Blvd. Task Force Fire District Personnel Committee Inland Empire League of California Cities League of California Cities Economic, Comm Dev & Hsg Subcorn Planning/Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee Public Works Subcommittee Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee SCAG Solid Waste Subcommittee Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee SCAG-Regional Council DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Alternate Curatalo Cable Television Subcommittee Public Safety Subcommittee Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority Chamber of Commerce Representative Inland Empire League of California Cities Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Alternate Alternate COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS December 18, 1996 Gutierrez Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Community Foundation Subcommittee Housing Set Aside Subcommittee Library Subcommittee Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee Multi-Family Development/Signage Task Force Planning/Historic Preservation Subcommittee Public Safety Subcommittee DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Williams Chamber of Commerce Representative Economic DevelopmentJFoothill Blvd. Task Force Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Public Works Subcommittee Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT) Omnitrans SANBAG DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Alternate Alternate h :~data\forms\ccsu bco m, 96 January 15, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.~ular Meetin.a A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeling of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 15, 1997 in the Courtall Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:14 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Debbie Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of check from DARE Fund Raiser by Rotary Club. Rotary Club representatives presented the City a check in the amount of $3,000 that was collected from the DARE fund raiser. Mayor Alexander presented them with a Proclamation thanking them for their assistance. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: November 20, 1996 December 4, 1996 (special meeting) City Council Minutes January 15, 1997 Page 2 December 4, 1996 December 11, 1996 (Curatalo absent) January 1, 1997 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos.12/11/96, 12/18/96 and 12/24/96; and Payroll ending 12J24/96, for the total amount of $1,325,719.11. D3. Approval of an order to vacate service vehicle turnaround on the northeast corner of Lot I of Tract 13566-2 generally located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Cherry Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 97-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED THE SERVICE VEHICLE TURNAROUND ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF TRACT 13566-2, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF CHERRY AVENUE D4. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 97-001) for Assessment Engineering for Park and Recreation District No. PD-85 to NBS Public Resource Group in the amount of $13,500.00 to be funded from Fund No. 90-4130-6028, to accomplish a property owner election, as set forth in Proposition 218, D5. Approval of Renewal Agreement with Citrus Little League for Snack Bar and Field Use. D6. Approval to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Community Center Development Fee Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency (CO RA96-010), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 96-052) and Foothills Vineyards Center, which adds the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (CO FD97-004). D7. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Matedais Bond, and File a Notice of Completion for CUP 94-03, located at 9551 Lucas Ranch Road. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $19,500.00 Labor and Materials Bond $9,750.00 RESOLUTION NO. 97-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 94-03, LOCATED AT 9551 LUCAS RANCH ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Curatalo abstaining from voting on the December 11, 1996 minutes. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes January 15, 1997 Page 3 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONS Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 567. ORDINANCE NO. 567 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.20.050 PERTAINING TO THE MEMBERSHIP AND LENGTH OF TERMS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 567. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E2. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH SPEED LIMITS OF 55 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO ARROW ROUTE, 50 MPH ON ETIWANDA AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM 1-15 TO ETIWANDA AVENUE. 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO HAVEN AVENUE. 55 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE. 50 MPH ON 4TH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO I-15, AND 50 MPH ON ARROW ROUTE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 568. ORDINANCE NO. 568 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 568. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF VACATING AGATE STREET AND DISPOSING OF CITY OWNER PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C" OF TRACT 6846, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN HAMILTON AND MIGNONETTE STREETS Staff report presented by Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes January 15, 1997 Page 4 MOTION: unanimously, 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 97-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED AGATE STREET AND THE DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIMING LOT "C" OF TRACT 6846 Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 97-003. Motion carded No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE NAMING OF THE NEW RECREATION ACTIVITY CENTER (OLD GEMCO BUILDING) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Biane stated he liked option No. 1. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed. Councilmember Gutierrez and Mayor Alexander also liked option No. 1. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to approve the name of "RC Family Sports Center". Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF RECENT COURT DECISION AND THE CITY OF HIGHLAND'S APPROACH TO RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATIONS (Continued from September 18, 1996 meeting) Mayor Alexander stated the City had at one time an Ordinance requiring residential fire sprinklers, but that it has since been done away with. He asked if the Council was interested in pursuing this again. Coundlmember Williams felt, as she has in the past, tliere should be a State Code requirement for this if that is what everyone wants, and that it should not be looked at on a cityy-by-city basis to mandate this to builders. Councilmember Biane stated he would like to continue receiving any new information that is available on this subject, but that he has not seen anything to date that he did not already previously know. ACTION: No action was taken to pursue this. City Council Minutes January 15, 1997 Page 5 12. DISCUSSION OF FORMING TASK FORCE TO REVIEW CENTRAL PARK (Continued from December 18, 1996 meeting) Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Mayor Alexander stated he thought that at the last Council meeting it was agreed that all five Councilmembers wanted to be part of the Task Force. Councilmember Williams concurred and felt it definitely should be done this way. Councilmember Biane asked how many Commissioners would be involved. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he was suggesting there be one from the Planning Commission and one from the Park and Recreation Commission. Mayor Alexander felt there should be more than three from the general public. He felt there should be no less than six. Councilmember Gutierrez felt they should advertise for the Task Force members. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the following membership of the Central Park Task Force: Youth/Adult Sports - 2 people Senior Citizens - 2 people Cultural/Arts - 2 people General public - 6 people, with 3 being from the nearby properties Council - 5 Planning Commission - 1 Park and Recreation Commission - 1 13. DISCUSSION OF THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL INFORMATIONAL SIGNS ON POLES (Oral) Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt there have been a lot of signs that are being left on trees and poles. He continued to show the various types of signs that he had removed himself. He felt Code Enforcement should send a staff person out on Monday mornings and go through the main thoroughfares of the City to remove these signs, and they could also make a note of any graffiti that needed to be removed. He felt this was very important, especially on Milliken and Haven and any other main streets. Councilmember Williams stated she had gone out last weekend and taken down some of the same types of signs from the trees. She thought Upland had an ordinance regarding this and wondered if it was working for them. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff would look into this. He added this was probably a manpower issue to go out and do this considering that Code Enforcement had been reduced in staff within the last several years. He stated staff would look into the Upland Ordinance. Coundlmember Williams asked if there was anything legal that the sign company could come back on the City for taking the signs down. James Markman, City Attorney, stated no. City Council Minutes January 15, 1997 Page 6 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he knew it would be hard to enforce this, but felt at budget time Cede Enforcement should be looked at for at least one more person to handle these types of problems. He asked that an information report come back at the next meeting on this matter. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located on Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parties; regarding terms of payment. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:56 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CItY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOK PERIOD: 12-31-96 (96/97) RUN DATE: 11131/96 PAGEI VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR, ANT, 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTINGre, INC, 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR I6566 AMA/PAOGETT-THOMPSON 1630 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS 12 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 37 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ADHm 24 ARBOR NURSERY INCo 26 A$SOCIATEO ENGINEERS 2437 ASSOCIATED GROUPm THE 1061 AWARDS dY CHAMPION 4673 8 C O SPECIALTIESm INC., 4363 BANK OF AMERICA lIST BLAKE PAPER CO.,m, IHC., 3911 3962 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 16545 CALIFo PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 1223 CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORPORATION 6735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 5114 CANCO 681 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN T3 CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIOre. INC, 2362 CON SER COMPANYm INC, 5280 COMPLETE CARE 633 CONSOLIOATED ELECTRICAL OISTo 4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS 85 CUCANONGA CO wATLR OIST Z3v 0 ~ K CONCkET~ CO 286 DAISY WH~L - J ..uON COm INC Z~.O:~ OAPP.'R TIRF CO., INC, 347 OAY-TIMERSm INC, 5121 OE VOO~HTm ~COTT J, 1290 O6ER CREE~ C~R WASH ~782 DIAMOND CRE6K POOLS ~177 DIAZ TURF SERVICE · 205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICSm INC, S137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVZCE · 876 ENVICOM CORPORATION 3707 ESGIL CORPORATION ~516 EXCEPTIONAL TERMITE 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 98 FORD PRINTING & MAIL/NGm ZNC 1082 FRANKLIN ~UEST CO, lZ~5 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A, 1~00 GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 158 HOLLIOAY ROCK COme INCm 1136 HOSEMAN 161 HOYT LUMBER COme SeN, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS ORGANIZED MGRS, MEETING OFFICE SUPPLIES APWA MEMGERSHZP ANNUAL DUES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE ENGRAVED PLAQUE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSZONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES TREASURER*S HANDBOOK HONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE ADVERTISING OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MEDICAL PREMIUM VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES SERVICE/REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ohmICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY WATE- -~LLINGS ~TR;cT MALrdTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES UFFICE SUPPLIES P~OFESSIUNAL 58RVICES V~HICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES DSPOSZT REFUND SUPPLIES & SERVICES OFFICE EOUIPMENT NISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAN CHECK PROFESSIONAL SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGISLATIVE SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE HONTHLT TELEPHONE BILLINGS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $1 CHECKI OVERLAP I 112685 394,66 112486 25m122o00 112667 751,92 112488 139,00 112689 105,27 112490 26,00 112491 80,00 112692 2m155,00 · 112493 160922,90 1124~4 129,30 112695 70,06 112496 195.50 112497 300,00 112498 62.50 112499 175.,00 I 112500 120,00 112.501 45,00 112502 215,50 112503 9,Z5 112506 61,07 112505 26,288,34 112506 129,50 m 112507 112}08 -'>0,00 .2 2)09 133,61 llZ51U 1 llZ.;ll - 11-'>1~ m 11251) llZ~16 75.43 llZ>17 14v,77 ll2~lu b6.~,7~. l1251v 2~,90 m 112520 )~.0,00 112521 90,00 112522 250,00 112523 195,00 112526 53,10 112525 610,10 t 112526 3m733,25 1125Z7 11e660,68 112528 391,50 t 112529 40.,00 112530 708,86 112531 7.,81 112532 Is300,00 112533 168o50 112536- 112536 >>> I 112535 996,22 m 112536 633,50 112537 T,63 e 112538 257,97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA · LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-31-96 (96/97) · NAME "" ........."""' ....."""""""""""" ......~L2~:I;.~:I~:L..~22: 2 VENDOR ITEH DESCRIPTION eeeeeeeememe~em · -- .....-- .......-----. ........ ............ .......... ..........------.....-.. ......~:~ No,ARR. ANT. ** CHECKI OVERLAp 1866 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112539 166,42 101 I C e 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112540 l~,~,ll IAEI DUES 195o00 112561 60,00 ~.25~ I~N CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1125~2 1~.1~0.62 4172 IMAGING PLUS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 1125~3 Z06.85 2~15 ZNLANO UHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112!>66 88.89 19~1 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRONt INC, MAINT SUPPLIES 112565 615o86 849 LAWSON PRODUCTSe INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES m 112566 588°90 J67 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES FINANCIAL MGMTo MEETING 112567 120.00 16412 LITTLE TZKES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112568 37.33 5276 M ~ P MOBILE HONES ARNETTE FELT REHA8 112569 le265.60 5283 NAVERe COBLE & PALHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112550 625.00 ~.979 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAZNTENANCEeLLC JANITORIAL SERVICES 112551 10~998.65 5275 MUELLER SPORTING GOODS RECREATION SUPPLIES 112552 16o81 515~, MYRIAD SOLUTIONS MISC COHPUTER SUPPLIES t 112553 9e167083 712 NORRZS-REPKEe INC. CONSULTING SERVICES 112556 5,573.50 16613 NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH RECREATION REFUND 112555 5.00 523 OFFICE OEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES t 112556 dIZ,69 1824 ORIENTAL TRAOING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112557 189.85 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 112558 298°38 2987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORHATZON SYSTEMS MONTHLy SERVICE I 112559 566.27 791 PHI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 112560 831.27 693 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 112561 290.10 6401 PRAXAZR EQUIPMENT RENTAL I 112562 26,,,16 ~.18 R M A GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES I 112563 2m18~.00 2257 RAUL'S AUTO TRINe ZNC. VEHICLE REPAIRS 112564 111.96 5170 REOOI 6RAKE SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES I 112565 32.~9 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS I 112566 77,02 5281 ROMANeS MACARONi GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 112567 30..00 >81 SAN 6ERNARDZND COUNTY CAL-IO PROGRAH 112568 139.25 1105 SEAL FURNITURE t SYSTEMS XNC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 112569 2..59 5276 SHAROUe OIANA GRAPHIC DESIGN 112570 1T5.O0 2507 S[EBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 112571 9,676.84> V180 SMITH, JACGUELZNE RECREATION REFUNDS 112572 69.00 3278 SO CALZF EDISON MONTHLy ELECTRIC BILLS 112573 16e87d~..80 <<( 112576- 112582 )>> 1~.32 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS I 112583 6e020.17 3138 SOUTHWESTERN BAG CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112586 le183.72 9781 TAX SEMINAR TAX SEMINAR 112585 60..00 2737 U.C. REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 112586 155.00 6559 U*S, GUAROS COee INC, SECURITy GUARD SERVICE 112587 le025,02 2868 ~ALL STREET JOURNAL SUESCRZPTION 112588 92..67 478 idARREN ~ CO., CARL LIABILITy CLAIMS t 112589 295.56 213 MAXlEe KLEEN-LZNE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES 112590 565.22 9783 MHITAKERe CHARLENE RECREATION REFUNOS 112591 69.00 9786 MOHL RANCHO PARTNERS OEPOSIT REFUNO 112592 500..00 TOTAL 192,075.63 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-08-97 (96/97) VENDOR NAME RUN DATE: 01/09/97 PAGE: 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 3901 1 3070 4347 16587 14 4207 16588 973 4564 16589 16590 26 16591 1061 16592 33 1247 703 16376 254 4369 16601 16593 16594 3942 4735 4251 68 16595 74 2470 4907 4316 85 16596 16597 4240 60 107 16598 4937 16602 2510 4895 1144 1082 1245 3-D CARPET & DRAPERY A & A EQUIPMENT ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK & ACTION BLINDS PLUS ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. ALL STAR ELECTRIC INC. ALPHAGRAPHICS AMHEALTH MED. QROUP OF CALIF. oP.C. ANDREWS-COOK, DE ETT ARREOLA, ARTURO ASSOCIATED ENQINEERS AUDIO RENAISSANCE TAPES AWARDS BY CHAMPION BARNES, CONNIE BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE BLAKE PAPER CO, INC. BOB AND ED'S QLASS BOTTOM LINE PERSONAL BRANDMAN ASSOC INC, MICHAEL BRODART BOOKS BUEOE, LOIS BUI, EMILY C.D.K. CONTRACTING COMPANY CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL CALOLYMPIC SAFETY CATERING, JOHN CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE CHINA POINT CITY RENTALS COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. CORPORATE EXPRESS CUCAMONOA CO WATER DIST CUPP, RYAN CWA & ASSOCIATES, INC. DARTNELL CDRPDRATIONo THE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF DETCD DOOR COMPONENTS INC. DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTINQ EWINO IRRIGATION PRODUCTS EZE TRUCKIN~ FAIRVIEW FORD FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA FRAME-ART FRANKLIN QUEST CO. ~IBBS CONSTRUCTION OONSALVES & SON, dOE A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE REPAIRS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND FINANCIAL/LEQISLATIVE MTQ INSTALLATION/SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES MEDICAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY SUPPLIES ENORAVED PLA~UE RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND DAMAQE DEPOSIT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SUBSCRIPTION DENTAL INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES IRRIQATION SUPPLIES DEPPOSIT REFUND EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE OFF HRS INSPECTION LEGISLATIVE SERVICES ** CHECK# OVERLAP 112604 112605 # 112606 112607 112608 112609 112610 112611 112612 # 112613 112614 112615 112616 112617 # 112618 112619 112620 # 112621 112622 112623 112624 # 112625 112626 112627 112628 # 112629 112630 112631 # 112632 112633 112634 # 112635 112636 # 112637 112638 - 112639 # 112640 112641 112642 112643 112644 # 112645 112646 112647 # 112648 112649 112650 112651 # 112652 # 112653 112654 112655 215.50 26.97 204.74 24.99 6.00 61.00 109.71 26.85 203.65 1,548.00 74.00 98.00 195.00 29.88 53.34 49.00 137.98 79.52 877.11 39.00 5,457.70 1,622.99 500.00 200.00 1,569.00 182.70 391.81 120.00 946.53 37.60 49.94 466.20 1,258.00 56.70 6,494.71 39.50 23.00 240.86 21,115.38 58.19 50.97 1,262.83 921.26 1,000.00 398,68 2,129.80 161.60 86,47 600.00 2,300.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-08-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 01/09/97 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 744 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS 16600 GRUIDL, CINDE 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 14418 HAJI, MARISOL 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO 14423 HELM PUBLICATIONS DIVISION 4870 HITT MARKING DEVICES, INC. 14429 HIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. 14439 HOLVEY, BILL 1234 HOSEMAN 161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S,M. 1866 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST--457 4188 I.D. BURR 4254 IBM CORPORATION 3885 INLAND LAWNMOWER 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 14430 INTERNET BUSINESS BROADCASTING 14427 INTOWN PROPERTIES INC 14428 JACKSON'S DISCOUNT GOLF 1941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC. 14414 KA.R. CONSTRUCTION 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 5282 KART-A-BAG 14438 KHO, TINA 4269 KING, BETSY L. 14416 KLENSKE, FAYE 14436 KLUZo KAROL 1218 KNOX 14432 KODIAK ENTERPRISES 14433 KOONIE, TINA 518 KUHNo MARY 4764 KULI IMAGE INC. 14420 KWEDAR, NANCY 14415 LA TOIS FINE ART 14431 LADD, CHRISTINE 321 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 14422 LEWIS, BRYAN 14417 LOPEZ, GLENDA 4550 LUTTERMAN CONSTRUCTION 1062 M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1062 M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS 14425 MACAY INTERNATIONAL 14410 MANELA, ROSE 14424 MARIMBA & MORE t---~_~549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. 4727 MARSHALL PLUMBING ** CHECK# OVERLAP DEFERRED COMP 112656 12,535.26 RECREATION REFUND 112657 37.00 <<< 112658 - 112658 MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 112659 5,001.78 RECREATION REFUNDS 112660 88.50 EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 112661 MISC 112662 5.94 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112663 192.24 BUSINESS LICENSE 112664 270.79 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112665 413.24 MISC 112666 300.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112687 27.36 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112668 305.10 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112669 87.37 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112670 129.30 DEFERRED COMP 112671 1,641.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112672 37.71 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112673 601.58 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 112674 282.46 SUBSCRIPTIONS 112875 22.57 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112676 59.26 BUSINESS LICENSE 112677 5.75 BUSINESS LICENSE 112678 80.24 BUSINESS LICENSE 112679 30.60 MAINT SUPPLIES 112680 22.28 BUS LICENSE 112681 MEDICAL INSURANCE 112682 ~4,209.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 112683 152.57 RECREATION 112684 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 112685 28,20 RECREATION 112686 90.00 RECREATION 112687 18.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112688 245.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 112689 32.40 RECREATION 112690 100.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I12691 58.06 RECREATION SUPPLIES 112692 1,089.24 RECREATION 112693 40.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 112694 6.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 112695 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 112696 110,457.50 RECREATION 112697 49.00 RECREATION 112698 98.50 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS # 112699 2,102.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES # 112700 470.25 TELEPHONE SERVICES 112701 352.70 BUSINESS LICENSE 112702 52.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 112703 60.30 BUSINESS LICENSE 112704 7.51 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 112705 17,567.29 REHAB. PROGRAM 112706 149.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-08-97 VENDOR NAME RUN DATE: 01/09/97 PAGE: 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 14419 1125 14434 21e8 14426 14421 14437 4374 1171 5154 2248 14435 4853 523 232 2640 1224 235 1441 1823 4223 818 9785 1079 542 4554 255 4401 65 4335 4335 251 1890 70 5170 5284 4257 5072 301 301 300 5029 132 ~787 4427 MC COBB, ROSIE MC OAREC MACHINE MC KIE, LINDA MICHAELS STORES INC. #3019 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. MITCHELL, AMY MIYAUCHI, FUMIKO MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. MOTOROLA COMMUN & ELEC., INC MYRIAD SOLUTIONS NAPA AUTO PARTS OAXACA, SUZANNE OCLC, INC. OFFICE DEPOT OMNITRANS ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS ORANGE COUNTY STRIPINO SERVICE, INC. OWEN ELECTRIC PACIFIC BELL PAGENET PAPER DIRECT, INC. PARAGON BUILDINO PRODUCTS INC. PECK/UONES CONSTRUCTION PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PIP PRINTING PITASSI, PETER U POMA DISTRIBUTING CO PRAXAIR PRINCIPAL MUTUAL PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARINO AUTH CA. PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARINO AUTH CA R & R AUTOMOTIVE R & R LIGHTING RANCHO CUCAMONOA CHAMBER REDDI BRAKE SUPPLY RESOURCE SERVICES RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ROBLES, RAUL P., SR. RT LAWRENCE CORPORATION SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT. SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC SANCHEZ, MIOUEL SANDEFUR, LINDA SCOTT, CHARLES RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION RECREATION SUPPLIES BUSINESS SUPPLIES RECREATION RECREATION EGUIPMENT RENTAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION CORE SERVICES CHARQES OFFICE SUPPLIES BUS PASSES MONTHLY SERVICES STRIPING SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PAGING SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES CONCRETE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS PHOTO SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES ARCHITECTURAL PROUECT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES EGUIPMENT RENTAL MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 2ND OUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 2ND GUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT VEHICLE MAINToSUPPLIES&SERVICE MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP MEETING VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PRINTS PROGRESS ESTIMATE TIRE REPAIR COMPUTER CONSULTANTS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE REIMB PARKINO CITATIONS UNDERGROUND TANKS MAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS SEMINAR EXPENSES ** CHECK# 112717 - # 112721 - # OVERLAP 112707 4~.00 112708 240.54 112709 37.00 112710 ~.63 112711 98.40 112712 98.00 112713 70.00 112714 136.55 112715 233.37 112716 5,999.40 112717 112718 1o035.71 112719 39.50 112720 76.48 112721 112722 308.21 112723 177.00 112724 188.14 112725 4,385.00 112726 1,475.96 112727 116.54 112728 535.93 112729 60.85 112730 144.90 112731 19.27 112732 71.62 112733 87.17 112734 8,110.17 112735 9,904.15 112736 11.56 112737 60,739.22 112738 739.29 112739 28°292.00 112740 91,681.50 112741 254.70 112742 51.33 112743 528.00 112744 147.57 112745 63.55 112746 796.04 112747 230.00 112748 472.50 112749 4,800.00 112750 746,098.83 112751 13,790.67 112752 1,625.00 112753 20,680.00 112754 381.44 112755 40.00 112756 67.50 112757 46.67 VENDOR NAME CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-08-~7 {96/~7) RUN DATE: 01/09/~7 PAOE: ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. 4 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC 31~ SO CALIF GAS CO. 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 322 SPARkLETTS 97~5 STATE OF WISCONSIN INVESTMENT BRD 9788 STRATZ, LINDA 9789 SUN RAMS PRODUCTS, INC. 336 SURVEYORS SERVICE 9791 T.D. ESCROW SERVICES 9790 T.N.T. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 1151 TECHNIC 5009 TOTAL T'S PLUS 4646 TRI-DIM FILTER COMPANY 97~2 TRIM MASTER, INC. 9793 TRUdILLO~ AMY 9794 U.S. FAMILY CARE MEDICAL GROUP 4558 U.S. GUARDS CO., INC. 350 U.S. POSTMASTER 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 2682 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 48~ UPLAND, CITY OF 3214 URISA 213 WAXIE~ kLEEN-LINE CORP 4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES 774 WESTEk COMPUTER SERVICES, INC 9796 WESTERN CHAPTER ISA 4711 WILLIAMS BACkHOE SERVICE 94 WOLFINBAROER INC., O.F. 2021 YORk INDUSTRIES 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICES MONTHLY GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MONTHLY SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS PERMIT OVERPMT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS OFFICE SUPPLIES ENGINEERING SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS ~USINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SECURITY QUARD SERVICE POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER UMP SERVICES # <{< 112783 - UNIFORM SERVICES # POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES MONTHLY WATER BILLIN~ M MEMBERSHIP MAINT SUPPLIES # SECURITY GUARD SERVICES # COMPUTER SERVICE # ARBORIST&TREEWORkER MEETINQ MAINTENANCE SERVICE & SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES ORAFFITI REMOVER RECREATION SUPPLIES ** CHECK# OVERLAP 112758 1, # 112759 1, 112760 - 112765 # 112766 10, 112767 112768 112769 112770 112771 112772 112773 112774 112775 112776 112777 112778 112779 112780 1, 112781 112782 112783 112784 1, 112785 4, 112786 3, 112787 112788 1o 112789 3, 112790 112791 112792 112793 112794 112795 ** TOTAL 1, 272, 490.00 376.98 158.00 57.00 123.57 61.00 23.00 299.12 204.78 15.58 245.00 30,17 726.29 10.00 ~8.00 285.27 025,02 225,00 440.00 035.55 500.00 471.60 20.00 269.58 495.86 687.50 200,00 23,17 172,40 129,30 141.37 817. O2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-15-97 (96/97) ....... · ~=====, = .... RUN DATE: 01/16/97 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 5114 CAMCO 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 4~07 CONTRACTORS EGUIPMENT CO. 1 A & A EGUIPMENT 4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHy 10 A & R TIRE SERVICE 16603 A NEW & LIVING WAY FELLOWSHIP 4373 A-CO SANITATION 4347 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK & 3785 ACTION ART 4297 ACTION DOOR CONTROLS 16604 AERO FAB INC. 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 66~ ALCORN FENCE COMPANY 4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. 16605 AMERI PIZZA & PASTA 16478 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS 16606 ANGIE'S MOLD FINISHING 16607 ANTON, FRANCIS 2437 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE 402 AUTO RESTORATORS 4110 BABCOCK & SONS, INC., E.S. 6153 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 16608 BAUMAN, RUSS 4441 BEST BUY CO., INC 16609 BEST, VICKI 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO, INC. 1478 BNI BUILDING NEWS 16610 BOLING, HARRY 5145 BOSE, RATHINDRA 16611 BOZEK, PATRICIA 16612 BURGER KINQ #6163 48~8 BUYERS LABORATORY, INC 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 5057 CALFON CONSTRUCTION INC. 16613 CALIF. MANUFACTURER CONSULTANTS INC 4403 CALIF. PAVEMENT MAINT. CO., INC. 62 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL 5114 CAMCO 5259 CAN DO ADVERTISING 16614 CARDEN, J.M. 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. 914 CLAREMONT CAMERA 5~86 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, INC. 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ** CHECK# OVERLAP 108949* 36.72- <{< 108950 - 112592 MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS 112593. 3,383.50 {{< 112594 - 112635 EGUIPMENT 112636* 1,258.00- ({( 112637 - 112811 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 112812 PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES # 112813 66.52 <(< 112814 - 112814 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 112815 3,283.17 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 112816 200.00 EGUIPMENT RENTAL 112817 121.46 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 112818 49.98 RECREATION SUPPLIES 112819 2,810.82 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112820 100.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 112821 7.94 <<< 112822 - 112822 CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS # 112823 1,398.92 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 112824 23.65 INSTALLATION/SERVICE # 112825 239.14 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 112826 23.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 112827 43.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 112828 23.40 RECREATION REFUND 112829 37.00 MONlHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 112830 1,454.50 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 112831 868.49 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112832 15.00 CCR TITLE 19 COMPLETE AMENDS 112833 74.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112834 298.27 RECREATION REFUND 112835 37.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 112836 167.97 RECREATION REFUND 11~837 RECREATION SUPPLIES 112838 32.33 SUBSCRIPTION # 112839 752.24 RECREATION REFUND 112840 37.00 CASH ADVANCE 112841 39.81 RECREATION REFUND 112842 37.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REUND 112843 46.77 SUBSCRIPTION 112844 145.00 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE 112845 75.00 PROGRESS ESTIMATE # 112846 108,673.78 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 112847 28.80 PAVEMENT MGMT CONTRACT # 112848 44,077.37 SUBSCRIPTION 112849 37.~5 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 11~850 36.72 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 112851 450.66 DEPOSIT REFUND 11285~ 1,000.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPpLIES # 112853 605.15 SUPPLIES/SERVICES # 112854 534.48 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112855 78.48 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112856 15.89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD; 01-15-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 01/16/97 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 16615 4907 4316 16616 85 16617 16618 2512 16619 16620 1291 16621 5121 3698 3909 902 105 16622 640 16623 3364 16624 3614 1258 5137 16625 4516 4914 123 48~5 16627 3356 16628 139 2090 4~02 137 16630 4486 5292 14443 462 14444 3458 14445 14441 CONTINENTAL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. CORPORATE EXPRESS CRAMER, BARRY CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST CURTIS, DEBBIE CUSTOM PIPE & COUPLING CO., INC. D.A.R.E. AMERICA D.S.G. INC. DANNELLEY, JENNY DATAVAULT - US. SAFE DEPOSIT CO. DAY, TRACEY DE VOOGHTo SCOTT J. DEALERS AUTO TRIM DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION DERBISH ~UERRA & ASSOC. DISCOUNT LIGUOR WAREHOUSE DRESCO REPRODUCTIONS EAGLE LABORATORIES EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS ELITE SUPPLIES INC. ELITE TOWING ELLIS, dANA EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE ESKEN, KHIEM EVANS SPORTING GOODS EXCEPTIONAL TERMITE EXCLUSIVE EMAGES FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL INC. FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA FOLANo STEVE GARCIA, VIVIAN GEORGE, VALARIE GIUGNIo JOANNE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP, THE GST TELECOM CALIFORNIA, INC. QTE CALIFORNIA QTE DIRECTORIES SALES CORPORATION GUARDIAN GUSSECK & ASSOCIATES, SARA HADDOCK° DAN HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. HEIMANNo QREG HEIR, PAT HILBURN, TERI HILTON HOTEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EGUIPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND D.A.R.E. MATERIAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND DATA STORAGE RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE STRONG MOTION FEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND TOWING SERVICE REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE MISC RECREATION REFUND RECREATION SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERY SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE <{< MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MEDICAL PREMIUM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECREATION INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION MEETINGS ** CHECK# OVERLAP 112857 8.00 112858 530.69 112859 34.91 112860 42.00 112861 - 112862 >>> # 112863 10o782.31 112864 42.00 112865 72.19 112866 554.08 112867 14.81 112868 37.00 112869 466.00 112870 43.75 # 112871 540.00 112872 65.00 112873 16,926.00 112874 5,916.09 112875 3,200.00 112876 20.00 112877 216.73 112878 23.00 112879 18.00 112880 23.00 # 112881 278.00 112882 250.00 112883 3o150.00 112884 74.00 112885 137.27 112886 ~85.50 # 112887 332.41 # 112888 31.00 112889 6.00 112890 362,805.39 112891 37.00 112892 21.90 112893 49.00 112894 37.00 112895 563.68 112896 2,500.00 112897 490.00 112898 - 112898 >>> # 112899 1,486.68 112900 45.07 # 112901 551.30 112902 295.37 112903 37.00 # 112904 594.58 112905 37.00 112906 369.60 112907 37.00 112908 300.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-15-97 196/97) .......... ==== ...... = ..... = .... ===, RUN DATE: 01/16/97 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME = ...... ============================ ...... ===== .... ====== .... ========================= ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 4150 HOLIDAY PRINTING PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE # 112909 19,051.22 14442 HOOVER BROTHERS, INC. RECREATION 112910 22.58 1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112911 94.28 161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112912 144.79 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112913 955.40 14440 INT'L ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF POLICE MENBERSHIP DUES 112914 100.00 175 JOBS AVAILABLE ADVERTISEMENTS 112915 168.48 14298 KAY, MARY-CHRIS RECREATION REFUND 112916 88.50 3338 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS RECREATION SUPPLIES 112917 108.18 14450 LEON, LYNN RECREATION 112918 37.00 4572 LINEAR SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112919 6,850.06 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 112920 33.12 5 M & M CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS COURT REPORTING SERVICES 112921 244.35 549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 112922 33,663.16 4763 MARKS CABLEVISION ADVERTISING 112923 2,441.92 3907 MASTER-SORT, INC. PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 112924 42.55 4483 MATHISEN OIL CO , INC. GASOLINE 112925 10,518.05 1125 MC GAREC MACHINE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112926 209.53 14448 MENEMDEZ0 TINA RECREATION 112927 25.00 14317 MENTOR/USED OIL USED OIL FORUM 112928 20.00 602 MEYER, PAT REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 112929 43.92 14449 MITTAL, KRISTAN RECREATION 112930 49.00 14446 MORRIS, DENISE RECREATION 112931 37.00 593 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION NNA MEMBERSHIP DUES 112932 29.00 14447 NUMO, MONICA RECREATION 112933 37.00 <{< 112934 - 112934 OFFICE SUPPLIES # 112935 MONTHLY SERVICES # 112936 INSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCISE CLASS 112937 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 112938 PAGING SERVICE 112939 REFUND OVRPMT CITY COUNCL AGND 112940 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112941 RECREATION SUPPLIES # 112942 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112943 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 112944 ADVERTISEMENT 112945 ADVERTISEMENT 112946 RECREATION SUPPLIES 112947 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 112948 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 112949 <<< 112950 - 112950 VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 112951 MAINT SUPPLIES # 112952 VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES # 112953 COMMUNICATION CHARGE # 112954 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112955 PRINTS 112956 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112957 CAL-ID PROGRAM # 112958 CAL-ID PROORAM 112959 523 OFFICE DEPOT 2640 ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS 2,286,65 4904 OTT, LAURA 175.95 9797 PACIFIC COAST SALES 237.60 1823 PAGENET 30.00 9798 PARKER, COVERT, CHIDESTER 27.78 757 PEP BOYS 118.00 542 PIP PRINTING 157.02 1049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 68.31 9799 PORVENE DOORS INC 1,210,64 1314 PRECINT REPORTER 38.00 1314 PRECINT REPORTER 221.00 4292 PRICE COSTCO 157.25 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 457.48 9800 GUEEN SALON 49.21 5,70 251 345 2705 4323 4130 276 581 581 R & R AUTOMOTIVE 2,153.80 R.D.O. EGUIPMENT COMPANY 469.6~ RH.F., INC 200.04 RAM MOBILE DATA USA, LP 2,602.31 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE 21.55 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 31.03 S.B. COUNTY, DEPT OF INFO SVCS 30.00 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,831,92 9.69 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 01-15-97 (96/97) ...... RUN DATE: 01/16/97 PAQE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP. AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 9801 SANCHEZ, LUIS RECREATION REFUNDS 112960 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 112961 9802 SELLERS, JUDY RECREATION REFUNDS 112962 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC TELEPHONE SERVICES 112963 351 SIQN SHOP, THE MAINT SUPPLIES 112964 1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES # 112965 3278 SO CALIF EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS 112966 <<< 112967 - 112967 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS # 112968 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS BILLS # 112969 4961 SOUTHEAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 112970 <<< 112971 - 112976 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 112977 4176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 112978 9803 STOUT, RICHARD RECREATION REFUNDS 112979 4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 112980 4445 T & G ROOFING SERVICE & SUPPLIES 112981 2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL # 112982 2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 112983 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES # 112984 4569 TEE'S PLUS SCREEN PRINTING FACTORY POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES 112985 4448 TREADWAY GRAPHICS POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES 112986 4890 TUCKER & SONS, J.G. SERVICE AND SUPPLIES # 112987 4558 U.S. GUARDS CO.o INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 112988 3912 UNIQUE CREATIONS RECREATION SUPPLIES 112989 9804 UNITED STEEL WORKERS RECREATION REFUNDS 112990 1660 VANIER GRAPHICS CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 112991 4158 VAUGHAN'S SHIRTZ D.A.R.E. T-SHIRTS 112992 3422 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES # 112993 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING 112994 4714 VPD/PVT LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 112995 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 112996 675 WYNN'S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES 112997 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 112998 70.00 118.51 74.00 104.70 181.83 246.63 308.65 78,578. 2,180. 3~717. 44 37 38 33,342.71 386.38 37.00 835.00 100.61 30.12 4,896.16 77.64 685.65 279.12 827.71 3.41 200.00 616.92 547.75 784.76 7,102.05 128.76 394.53 75.43 1,116.59 ** TOTAL 811,166.38 TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control S7S7 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 DROPPING YES APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE{S) File Number .............. 326777 Receipt Number ......... 1118914 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 12-18-96 Issued Date PARTNER NO DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of'Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits7 If premise licensed: Type of license' Transferor's names/license: License TVDe RIVERSIDE ROCKY'S NEW YORK STYLE PIZZERIA 9615 FOOTHILL BLVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91720 ORIHUELA LUIS Transaction Tvoe Fee TVDe 296218 Master DUD Date Fee 1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 DEC 18,1996 $150.00 2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 DEC 18,1996 $205.00 3.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 5 DEC 18,1996 $195.00 4.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W MODIFICATION OF CONDIT NA YES 1 DEC 18,1996 $100.00 TOTAL $650.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Countv of SAN BERNARDINO Date DEC 18,1996 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature a~pears below. certifies and says: (I} He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized Io make fhis application on its behalf: (2) that he has read the foregoing and kno~.s the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest m the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Degartment or to gain or establish a preference Io or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or Injure an',' creditor of transferor; (5) tha, the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no r,jsultlng iiabilit) to Ihe Department. '- Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) HERNANDEZ LISA C ~ · HERNANDEZ MARCELLO S A POMPA AUREA MV ° 231 & 227 attached DEC 19 1996 City ot Rancho Cucarnonga Planning Division ABC 211 (5/96) / I Application ;or an ABC License I Appli~: Rocky's New York Style Pi~a Address: 9615 Foothill Blvd. Site Zoning: F.B.S.P., Subarea 3, SC Adjacent Zoning: North: F.B.S.P., Subarea 3, SC South: Low East: F.B.S.P., Subarea 3, CC VVest: F.B.S.P, Subarea 3, CO S CALIFORNIA DROPPING YES .... APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 File Number .............. 327080 Receipt Number ......... 1120201 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date I-2-97 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License TVDe RIVERSIDE B & J'S 9653-55 BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 GORTER BARBARA DOREEN 258337 Transaction TVDe Fee TVDe Master DUD Date Fee 1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNTJAL FEE NA YES 0 JAN 02,1997 $205.00 2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO pERSON TRANE NA YES 0 JAN 02,1997 $150.00 3.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 1 JAN 02o1997 $39.00 TOTAL $394.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date JAN 02,1997 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, cert]fies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in tbe foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no De'son other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant*s business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a prcferenc~ to or for any creditor or traasfcror or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor: (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licxnsee with no resulting liability to the D~partment. MALLEN PATRICK JOSEPH ' · // ABC 211 (5/96) ECEIVED JAN 7 RF, C,'D Ckty o~ Ftancho Cucamonga planning Division Application for an ABC License RASFI INF Application: Renewal Applicant: B & J's Address: 9653-9655 Baseline Site Zoning: Neighborhood ComTerdal Adjacent Zoning: North: Neighborhood CornT~dal South: Office Professional East: Neighborhood Corrrnerdal West: High, Senior Housing Overlay Dist. S CALI!O!INIA DROPPING YES APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 File Number .............. 326879 Receipt Number ......... 1119244 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 12-20-96 Issued Date When Trfd PARTNER DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License TvDe RIVERSIDE SUNRIZE LIQUOR 8679 BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 LAXMI INVESTMENT CORPORATION 274349 Transaction TYpe Fee TYpe Master DUD Date Fee 1.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 DEC 20,1996 $1274.00 2.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 DEC 20,1996 $446.00 3.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 1 DEC 20,1996 $39.00 TOTAL $1759.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date DEC 20,1996 Under penalty of perju~, each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true, (31 that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest m the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application ~s made; (4) that the transfer applicatidn or proposed transfer ts not made to sadsly the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor: (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) PATEL BHARAT B ~b C~,TL'~ k ~ Attach: 231 & 227 RECEIVED JAN 7 REP.,'D City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division ABC 211 Application for an ABC License ' C Z IT i- I Application: Renewal & Transfer of Ownership Applicant: Sunrize Liquor Address: 8679 Baseline Site Zoning: Neighborhood Commerdal Adjacent Zoning: North: Low South: Medium East: Office Professional West: Neighborhood Comrnerdal N S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND HENRY STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 32- 4637-9530 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the Almond Street and Storm Drain Improvements, located at the southwest comer of Almond Street and Henry Street, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The project consists of the construction of a storm drain catch basin, A.C. pavement repair, concrete curb and gutter replacement, and related work to correct an existing drainage problem just west of Henry Street on the sourth side of Almond. The catch basin will tie into an existing City 48" diameter storm drain which in tum connects to the County's intercept channet. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $21,693.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for February 11, 1997 and February 18, 1997, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday March 4, 1997. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachment Y ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION CUCAM-ONGA ,,,~ ,, ,.1,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,..,,~.2,:,,.~ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE RESOLUTION NO. qT' C7L3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVE_MENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND HENRY STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "THE ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND HENRY STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 4, 1997, sealed bids or proposals for the ALMOND STREET, STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of ALMOND STREET, STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Califomia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem ~vages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is perforn~ed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all wor_krnen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor)or Class "C-8" (Concrete Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calitbrnia. Dated this 5th of February, 1997. Publish Dates: February 11, t997 and February 18, 1997. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 5th day of February, 1997. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: February 11, 1997 and February. 18, 1997. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February5,1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HERMOSA AND CENTER AVENUES, TO BE FUNDED FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROP 111, ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9607 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the Arrow Route Street Improvements at Deer Creek Channel, located between Hermosa and Center Avenues, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The project consists of minor to moderate pavement repairs to both sides of Deer Creek Bridge. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $18,392.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for February 11 and February 18, 1997, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 4, 1997. Respec ~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachment ARROW ROUTIE AT IDFEiER CREEK 81MIPROVEMFEN7 PROJFEC7 Foothill Blvd ,E N.T.S. CIVIC CENTER PROJECT SITE Arrow Rt r" Project consist of minor to moderate pavement repairs either side of Deer Creek Bridge. SOnUT ON N0. q 7- 005" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HERMOSA AND CENTER AVENUES, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HERMOSA AND CENTER AVENUES". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to ~vit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 4, 1997, sealed bids or proposals for the "ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. _ Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or Bo When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all wor_kmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City ofRancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said ~vork shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Caliibmia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, trader penalty of perjury, that the information be_ing provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 5th of February, 1997. Publish Dates: February 11, 1997 and February 18, 1997. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, this 5th day of February, 1997. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: February 11 and February 18, 1997. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to designate the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard as a Point of Historic Interest. - APN. 209-085-04. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends approval of the attached Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, designating the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater, Located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, as a Point of Historic Interest- APN: 209-085-04. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This application was initiated by the City in keeping with the established policies of the Historic Preservation Commission. Historic Preservation Commission policy requires a historic cultural resource review by the Historic Preservation Commission before issuance of a demolition permit for a potentially significant structure. As with most sites and structures in the area known as Northtown, a historic cultural resource review has not been conducted for the subject site. The subject building was constructed in 1948 as a local movie theater in direct competition with the previously demolished Cucamonga Theater, which was located approximately one block east on 25th Street. The Raoul Torrez Theater was actually constructed by three local gentlemen, which included Mr. Torrez, Mr. Valdez Ledesma, and Mr. Mclntyre. The theater was used to show Spanish language films and showcased Hispanic talents from the Los Angeles area. Patrons of the theater came from the entire region and included the busing in of migrant Zenarjo workers to enjoy the entertainment. The decline of movie revenues in 1955 led to the purchase of the theater by a local social service club called Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. The building does not qualify as a significant architectural resource; however, the subject site and structures qualify for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as; historical, cultural, and neighborhood and geographic setting. _J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT POI 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 5, 1997 Page 2 Recently, the Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) acquired the property with the goal of reestablishing a community center. It was NHDC's desire that such a goal could be reached and a conceptual feasibility study was prepared. This study indicated that rehabilitation would be significantly higher in cost than new construction. NHDC is now taking another look at the feasibility of rehabilitating the structure for reopening as a neighborhood center. A Point of Historic Interest will offer NHDC the greatest flexibility in determining the future use of the site. Additional details are contained in the HPC/PC Staff Report attached for reference. FACTS FOR FINDING See attached City Council Resolution. Respectful submitted, City Planner BB:LJH:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - December 11, 1996, Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report Exhibit"B"-December 11, 1996, Draft Minutes of Historic Preservation Commission meeting Resolution approving POI 96-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 11, 1996 Chairman and Members of Historic Preservation Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 96-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to designate the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater as a Local Landmark, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, or alternatively as a Point of Historic Interest, and update the Historic Resource Inventory List appropriately - APN: 209-085-04. BACKGROUND General: This Application was initiated by the City in keeping with established policy of the Historic Preservation Commission. Historic Preservation Commission policy requires a historic cultural resource review by the Histodc Preservation Commission before issuance of a demolition permit for a potentially significant structure. As with most sites and structures in the area known as Northtown, a historic cultural resource review has not previously been conducted for the subject site. Recently, the Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) acquired the property with the goal of reestablishing a Community Center. It was NHDC's desire that with Redevelopment Agency Assistance such a goal could be reached and a conceptual feasibility study was prepared. This study indicated that rehabilitation would be significantly higher cost than new construction. Subsequently, it was determined that the Redevelopment Agency would not be able to participate in such a project whether it was new construction or rehabilitation. B4 Historical Significance: The subject building was constructed in 1948 as a local movie theater in direct competition with the previously demolished Cucamonga Theater, which was located approximately one block east on 25th Street. The Raoul Torrez theater was actually constructed by three local gentlemen, which included Mr. Torrez, Mr. Valdez Ledesma, and Mr. Mclntyre. The theater was used to show Spanish language films and showcased Hispanic talents from the Los Angeles Theater as well. Patrons of the theater came from the entire region and included the busing in of migrant zenarjo workers to enjoy the entertainment. The declining of movie revenues in 1955 led to the purchase of the theater by a local social service club called the Logia Felipe Angeles, tnc. The building was used by not only the local group for meetings and events but also by other groups from as far away as San Jose. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 96-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 1996 Page 2 These groups were affiliated clubs of a larger state organization called La Sociada Mexicano. In 1966, the club raised the sloping theater floor and made the facility more useable for community events; e.g., dances, parties, and wedding receptions.- The club's activities including raising and donating funds for medical research, school scholarships, and burial expenses. Club members were barred from using the organization for political or religious related activities or affiliations. Information concerning the building and club activities was developed from interviews with several local residents on November 20 and 21, 1996. A copy of the draft transcripts is attached for reference. It is clear from the interviews that the building is an established feature of the Community and was used for a cultural purpose that is well recalled and associated with the Hispanic community of the area and the region. Site Characteristics: The attached Site Plan (Exhibit "A") shows the location of the subject structure. The subject site is immediately east of the Northtown Neighborhood Park. The building has been unoccupied since 1988, when an ownership dispute arose. The dispute was concluded in 1995 with the purchase by NHDC. NHDC's goal has been the ultimate reuse of the site as a community center, similar to the uses previously available through Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. The site and building are in need of rehabilitation with some deterioration visible; e.g., graffiti, weeds, boarded up doors and windows, and peeling paint. In addition, the structure has recently had several holes made in the roof and walls to facilitate a demolition investigation by NHDC. ANALYSIS: General: It appears that the strongest significant factor of historic value of the building is the previous use as an established community center. The NHDC has not taken an official position relative to the Landmark Designation and is currently reexamining the demolition option. If the NHDC does determine the demolition is preferred and opposes landmark designation the Historic Preservation Commission may want to alternatively consider designation as a Historic Point of Interest and conditions for appropriate mitigation. Landmark Designation: The structure is built with similar roof framing to other large buildings in the area. The use of wood string bowed trusses in this structure is typical of other historic buildings in the area; e.g., the Biane Winery Building on Eighth Street. In addition, the Theater contributes historic contextual value to the neighborhood. The building does not qualify as a significant architectural resource; however, the subject site and structures qualify for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance including such significant areas as; historical, cultural, and neighborhood, and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings section. Environmental Assessment: The designation of site and building is Categorically Exempt under Class 3.e of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 96-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 1996 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: Fact/s: Finding 2: Fac~s: Finding 3: Fact/s: Finding 4: Fac~s: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. The property identifies an historic period of transition from the agrarian community to a suburban/urban setting and the activities of the minority community that thrived in the area known as Northtown. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. As the one remaining theater from the two originally serving the community, it is clearly a rare example. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for over 30 years provided needed community resources and activities. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for 30 years provided needed community resources and activities. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact/s: As the one remaining theater from the two originally serving the community, it clearly contributes to the variety and historical continuity of the neighborhood. Finding 2: The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. Fac~s: The Building at approximately 5,400 square feet represents one of the last remaining larger community serving structures in the community. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within an expanded mailing beyond the normal 300 feet of the project site. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 96-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 1996 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Historic Landmark Designation 96-03 and direct staff to make applicable changes to the Historic Building/Site Inventory List. City Planner BB:LH/mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Site Location Map Photos Historic Resources Inventory Form Draft Local Residents' Interview Transcripts from November 20 and 21, 1996 Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation 96-03 0 0 °'~1::::; ._JZZ , HERMOBA~.,~,-F~.~ --- LLI .J, EXHIBIT B LD 96-03 PHOTOS ~(~orth) Elevation Southwest Comer Elevation Side (West) Elevation Rear (South) Elevation ] E'yI4 /~ / 7' ~ State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION 1. Historic Name: Logia Felipe Angeles Club (Lodge 19) Theater 2. Common or current Name: Northtown Housing Development Corporation Theater 3. Number & Street: 10071 Feron Blvd. City: Rancho Cucamonga Vicinity: Zip: 91729 County (3-Letter Designator): SNB Quad map No: UTM Z A: B: C: D: Parcel No: Lots 7,8,9, 10 of Block 5, Map of West Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, per Book 13 of Maps, Pages 1 &2. Other: DESCRIPTION 6. Property Category: Institutional If District, number of Documented Resources: 7. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the property, including condition, boundaries, surroundings, and (if appropriate) architectural style: The attached site plan (Exhibit "A") shows the location of the subject structure. The subject site is immediately east of the Northtown Neighborhood Park. The site and building are in need of rehabilitation with some deterioration visible; e.g., graffiti, weeds, boarded up doors and windows, and peeling paint. In addition the structure has recently had several holes made in the roof and walls to facilitate a demolition investigation by NHDC. 8. Alterations & Date: Interrior Remodel & 39 sq.ft. Rest Rm. Expansion 9. Related Features on Property: None 10. in 1966. Planning Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga 11. 12. 13. 14. Owner & Address Northtown Housing Development Corporation 241h Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729. Type of Ownership: PresentUse:Vacant Zoning: L (Low Density Residential 2-4 du/ac.) NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING 10071 FRON BLVD. PAGE 1 15. Threats: Building has been vacant since 1987, complicated by a property ownership dispute until 1995 when NHDC secured the site. Altough structurally intact the building has detteriorated because of defterred maintennnance. Current threat is a determination of econmic feasibility to undertake rehabilitation. HISTORICAL INFORMATION 16. Construction Date(s): 1947-48 Original Location: -Yes Date Moved: N/A 17. Architect: Unknown Builder: Raul Torrez 18. Historic Attributes (With number from List): SIGNIFICANCE AND EVALUATION 19. 20. Context for Evaluation: Theme: Area: Period: Property Type: Brei~y discuss the property's importance within the context. Use historical and architectural analysis as appropriate. Compare with similar properties. The subject Building was constructed in 1948 as a local movie theater in direct competition with the previously demolished Cucamonga Theater, which was located approximately one block east on 25 Th. Street. The Raoul Torrez theater was actually constructed by three local gentlemen, which included Mr. Torrez, Mr. Valdez Ledesma, and Mr. Mclntyre. The Theater was used to show Spanish language films and show cased Hispanic talents from the Los Angeles Theater as well. Patrons of the Theater came from the entire region and include the busing in of migrant zenarjo workers to enjoy the entertainment. The declining of movie revenues in 1955 lead to the purchase of the Theater by a local social service club called the Logia Felipe Angeles Inc. The Building was used by not only the local group for meetings and events but also by other groups from as far away as San Jose by affiliated clubs of a larger state organization called La Sociada Mexicano. In 1966 the Club raised the Sloping theater floor and made the facility more useable for community events; e.g., dances, parties, and wedding receptions. The Clubs activities including raising and donating funds for medical research, school scholarships, and burial expenses. Club members were barred from using the organization for political or religious related activities or affiliations. 21. Sources: San Bemardino County Building Record, Building Remodel Plans dated May 19, 1965 and June 14, 1966, and interviews with area residents on November 20, and 21, 1996. 22. Applicable National Register Criteria: 23. Other recognition: State Landmark Number: 24. Evaluator: L. J. Henderson Year of Evaluation: 1996 25. Survey Type: P/S (C=Comprehensive, P=Project Related, S=Single property) NORTHTOg THEATER BUILDING 10071 FRON BLVD. PAGE 2 26. 27. Survey Name: LD 96-03 Year Form Prepared: 1996 By (Name): L.J. Henderson Organization: City of Rancho Cuamonga Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive 91729 City, State, Zip. Rancho Cuamonga, Ca. 91729 Phone: (909)477 - 2750 Sketch map. Show location and boundaries of property in relation to nearby streets, railways, natural landmarks, etc. Name each feature. N NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING 10071 FRON BLVD. PAGE 3 15. Threats: Building has been vacant since 1987, complicated by a property ownership dispute until 1995 when NHDC secured the site. Altough structurally intact the building has detteriorated because of defferred maintennnance. Current threat is a determination of econmic feasibility to undertake rehabilitation. HISTORICAL INFORMATION 16. Construction Date(s): 1947-48 N/A Architect: Unknown Historic Attributes (With number from List): 17. 18. Original Location: -Yes Date Moved: Builder: Raul Torrez SIGNIFICANCE AND EVALUATION 19. 20. Context for Evaluation: Theme: Area: Period: Property Type: Breifly discuss the property's importance within the context. Use historical and architectural analysis as appropriate. Compare with similar properties. The subject Building was constructed in 1948 as a local movie theater in direct competition with the previously demolished Cucamonga Theater, which was located approximately one block east on 25 Th. Street. The Raoul Torrez theater was actually constructed by three local gentlemen, which included Mr. Torrez, Mr. Valdez Ledesma, and Mr. Mclntyre. The Theater was used to show Spanish language films and show cased Hispanic talents from the Los Angeles Theater as well. Patrons of the Theater came from the entire region and include the busing in of migrant zenarjo workers to enjoy the entertainment. The declining of movie revenues in 1955 lead to the purchase of the Theater by a local social service club called the Logia Felipe Angeles Inc. The Building was used by not only the local group for meetings and events but also by other groups from as far away as San Jose by affiliated clubs of a larger state organization called La Sociada Mexicano. In 1966 the Club raised the Sloping theater floor and made the facility more useable for community events; e.g., dances, parties, and wedding receptions. The Clubs activities including raising and donating funds for medical research, school scholarships, and burial expenses. Club members were barred from using the organization for political or religious related activities or affiliations. 21. Sources: San Bernardino County Building Record, Building Remodel Plans dated May 19, 1965 and June 14, 1966, and interviews with area residents on November 20, and 21, 1996. 22. Applicable National Register Criteria: 23. Other recognition: State Landmark Number: 24. Evaluator: L. J. Henderson Year of Evaluation: 1996 25. Survey Type: P/S (C=Comprehensive, P=Project Related, S=Single property) NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING 10071 FRON BLVD. PAGE 2 26. 27. Survey Name: LD 96-03 Year Form Prepared: 1996 By (Name): L.J. Henderson Organization: City of Rancho Cuamonga Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive 91729 City, State, Zip. Rancho Cuamonga, Ca. 91729 Phone: (909)477 - 2750 Sketch map. Show location and boundaries of property in relation to nearby streets, railways, natural landmarks, etc. Name each feature. Gtyofm, ,hoCucanm NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING 10071 FRON BLVD. PAGE 3 NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 NOVEMBER 20, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB-LODGE 19 MEMBERS PAGE I ' Interviewer- Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Interviewees - Nacho Gracia, NHDC. Vidal C. Rodriguez, Della Ramirez Orcino and Celia R. Martinez, Logia Felipe Angeles Club Members. (Larry) After 4 or 5 years, what happened then? (Unk.) What I heard they said it was originally closed down because of the county, the fire department. Too many people inside, no fire exits except for the front, no fire extinguishers, etc. Instead of putting more money into it, wasn't that much business, he just closed it down. He told some individuals if they wanted to buy it...got together and had some dances in Pomona to raise money to buy it. Finally the bought it in 1955. The lodge bought it...(Nacho?) I thought it was a bunch of people from here (Unk) No, no, originally, it was members of a lodge, and the lodge backed them up with a license to sell beer, stuff like that over there. They used the funds to sponsor it and they were getting paid back from what they made, and the rest was put into an account for them. (Larry) That was another club or lodge? (Unk.) No, it was the original owners ...... (Nacho) The original owners was not ..... the original owners were ........... then after that they sold it to...(Unk.) They didn't sell it ......... (Nacho) Let's go back to when it was built, it was built by whom ....... bought shares into it ..... (Unk) ..... loaned money for ..... pay the rest of it, the balance .... $100 month...I have the receipts, I know...(Larry) Do they have the names on them? (Unk) The .... I have some of the canceled checks, not all of them ...... (Larry) Pro ............ (unable to interpret spelling ) .... (Larry) Raul Torres was the one who built the building and offered it as a movie theater ...... private live theater as well .... process of buying it with backing of the lodge .........................(Nacho) When they formed the non-profit, they called themselves .......... Each city had its own lodge ....... (Larry) What was the purpose of the statewide group? (Unk.) It was started to help Spanish speaking people .......... got together for aide. Help finance their funerals .... (Nacho) They used to have dances to raise money to carry on programs they had...it's confusing...when the P ...... Had the branches .... this branch was ....... lodge 19, when they incorporated, they did not use ..........in fact that set it apart from statewide .......... (Larry) Were events just open to members, did they allow the public or non-members to have a dance (Nacho) If somebody said a wedding was coming up, they would rent the place for that event or whatever event it was .... (Unk.) The members would oversee the behavior of everybody. (Larry) .... used to have a theater style floor...raised up...do we know when they shut down...the club... 1967? 1987 it closed? (Nacho) A caretaker was left to watch over. His daughter was married to a minister of the church, so he turned the whole thing over to the church without NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discussion PurPoses Only NOVEMBER 20, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB-LODGE 19 MEMBERS PAGE 2 - permission .... Peace of the Valley. So then it took about 4 years in litigation to get it back. In the process of that happening, there was a deal made between the lawyers, the only way the church would stop battling it in the court and give it back to the lodge, if the lodge ever sold it, they would get half of the sales price .... these people didn't have that kind of money. That's when we stepped in and we made the deal with ........... and when the money came out of escrow, they got their half. (Larry) How much did you get it for? (Nacho) $47,000? We have been paying $3.25 sq. ft. for empty land and so we told them we couldn't use the building, so we would pay for the land only, so that is where the price came from. It closed this year. (Larry) Is the building an example of a past common use that is now rare or extinct...? (Nacho) If you would ask me if the building was still open, would we be still using as fund raisers, dances, yes we would. What happened, once the doors were locked, to use it again, we have to go back to the City, they would not allow us to use it ......(Larry) If it is an historical building, you can use ....so it's not quite as bad as .....(Nacho) The only problem...we had Dan Guerra and Pete Pitassi here to look at it, it was going to cost about $1,200,000 to bring it back...a new building would cost half as much. (Larry) Do you have a report or something? (Nacho) Yes, I should have had that for you, I'll get that for you (Larry) I'll need that right away. (Unk.) The building itself was built in 1949 (Unk) It says 1948 here. (Unk) ...they wanted to make the building .... Iodge...get together...in 1965. That's when they made a flat floor ..... 1958 ....... 1955 they tried to alter it .... 1965 they wanted to alter the building into a flat floor auditorium. (Unk) June 20, 1966 remodeled .... 1965 when they were working on it ..... (Larry) Did it carry the same name, or different name from Lodge 19 ........ (Nacho) Under Lodge 19, there is another name...the full name of the statewide organization ..... when this non-profit was formed, it wouldn't be affiliated with the state. The lodge has two hats, one affiliated with the state and one that is not. The state lodge cannot engage in political stuff ..... social group .... the state lodge would have no say so ...... difficult to understand .... (Larry) Do you know who the architect was? No? Pictures over the years?... (Nacho) It was the only building large enough to handle the parties, weddings, dances...(Larry) How big were the groups? (Nacho) Mexican weddings are huge...200-300 people at least...(Larry) How frequent were the functions? (Unk.) Dances...2-3 times a year ...... (Nacho) More frequent than that...(Larry) Is the item a site of importance, international, national, state .... (Nacho) State, because everybody as far as San Jose would come (Unk) San Diego ..... (Larry) .... that's a possibility .... there's Community Development Block Grant Program money .... (Unk) ...there is some there...80% redevelopment...(Larry) The problem with the YMCA it has to benefit low to moderate income people .... you know where they are building...in Victoria/Terra Vista. Those are not low income people DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 NOVEMBER 20, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB-LODGE 19 MEMBERS PAGE 3 - anymore. I can't use block grant money for a facility that is not for low and moderate income. I would have a hard time selling that to the Feds. I don't know where they are getting the idea they can use the money for that. It has to benefit low and moderate income people. I have to be careful, if I tear this building down, and then ask for federal money for a new building, they get real like did you do the right evaluation procedures...then .... you didn't follow regulations. We have to make sure we do this right ......... I don't think it is architecturally significant.(Nacho) When they did environmental inspections...tore (something) down ..... (Larry) Historic from a social/cultural thing. (Unk) The college used it for classes. The Boy's Club used it as well for about 3 years. The City leased it for a year...it was closed in 1987. (Larry) Do you have copies...environmental? What kind...(Nacho) I'll get them for you...asbestos, hazardous materials, looked at the ground for discoloration...I have that at the office and I'll get that for you tomorrow. (Larry) Did they do any concept plans for a new building (Nacho) We don't have plans, just information as far as cost, less square footage that this...landscaping and underground utilities. (Larry) What are your desires. (Nacho) The reason Northtown bought it, need a multipurpose facility for functions. (Larry) Have you discussed using the parking at the park? (Nacho) Peter had done a study on parking. (Larry) Maybe in exchange for having classes there during the week, you could use of parking. (Nacho) I think there are 32 parking spaces we could get .... alley .... Vacate .... nobody needs it so they would dedicate it back to us. (Larry) Do you think people in the neighborhood will be upset if it is torn down (Nacho) Yes, of course. It is one of the last original buildings. We brought that up but without the money to do anything, there is no alternative but to knock it down and start it over again. Most of them have come to realize we are right...(Larry) But there is money for a new building? (Nacho) This is what the City proposed to us, that the Redevelopment Agency would build it and lease it back to Northtown, and at a certain point, it would be deeded back to Northtown, or we would buy it. We don't want to lose control. If we lose control, we go back to the Neighborhood Center. We were the ones who built it with block grant funds and then we started to have meetings and gradually the City took over and started charging and now no one from Northtown goes there, because it was turned into a Senior Citizens Center. This is why if the City builds it and they put what they want there, if the council changes or if the staff changes, then they say no, wait a minute, we built it and it belongs to us .... then they dictate to us. NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discu$81on Purpose8 Only NOVEMBER 20, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB-LODGE 19 MEMBERS PAGE 4 ' We have some money, but we don't have enough to build it. We have some money, but not enough to build it, what we call unrestricted funds. We have ~200,000 of our own money to put in, a site that we've already acquired. But then, you have to go some type of endowment to run the place. (Larry) You would charge rental fees (Nacho) We could have fund raisers, that sort of thing...unless you have a history of doing that...on the initial budget you have to say how much it takes to run it and fund raisers may or may not happen, so we have a limited funding source ourselves .... (Larry) Northtown vision .... they could have support services for the community...after school programs...adult programs..education and cultural programs...(Nacho) That's the only building large enough .... lot size 16,000 ..... (Larry) Any building plans .... (Nacho) I couldn't locate them .... (Larry) How do you feel the condition of the building is, excellent-good-fair-deteriorated ..... (Unk) Fair. o.(Larry) Is the roof leaking? (Nacho) It is now...(Larry) You had the inspection with the idea of demolishing it all along. (Nacho) The board came to a decision that we did not have the money to rehab it so we, it was a policy decision to tear it down and build a new one. If there was money out there then the whole thing would change. (Larry) We have some money, did you consider a phased improvement program at all? (Nacho) I think at one time we talked about that. At what point would we be able to get in there? (Larry) We have to have it inspected to find out. Did the Building Dept. Inspect it? (Nacho) Carlos Silva went in there ...... the columns are not connected...what about the block.o.how are they connected ..... the block itself? (Larry) If it is determined that it is historically significant, that it is a resource, that means to demolish it, it is an adverse environmental impact. If it is an adverse impact, you have to do an environmental impact report. You can still demolish a resource, but you have to go through a 30 day review period of the EIR, you have to make a findings that there is an economic benefit to that. (Unk) Plus, if you demolish it, then afterwards is the City going to allow you to build it .... (Larry) Well, like you were saying...councils change. When you get ready to build, are you going to have the same group there that told you you could build there. That's why I hate to tear things down, because you lose ..... but you know, that's your decision. I'm just trying to advise you what the law requires us to do, what some of the pluses and minuses are. If we don't do it right, we could lose federal dollars in the future on a project. I don't want that to happen. I would rather follow procedures and get it done the right way. I don't really care...for some reason, there are some people at the City who are fixed on burning it down. I hate to hurry up and burn it down, and then someone will say you should have followed this, you should have followed that. (Nacho) To save some money, it was suggested they do a burn...a training burn. (Larry) Did you get NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only NOVEMBER 20, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB-LODGE 19 MEMBERS PAGE 5 ' an estimate for demolition? (Nacho) Yes, $27,000 to demolish and remove it. This is why the burn was suggested ..... There is still stuff to consider. Then if they do the burn, we need to get another bid. Two bids came in, one at $27,000 and one at $37,000, so obviously we took the one for $27,000. (Larry) The biggest cost of that is the dumping fee. I don't think you are going to save much on the dumping fee because it's burned. Does he know how significant this structure was, does he know the background? (Nacho) The whole City Council has. The whole thing comes down to dollars, I guess. If there was a way to get it and for us to maintain control, then that's fine .... the other thing is, we need to know, because we need to buy insurance...we don't have liability right now because we thought we were going to knock it down. I'm going to call and get liability now .... (Larry) Insurance is so cheap. (Unk) It's a lot cheaper than a lawsuit. (Larry) I am surprised you didn't have insurance while you were doing that. Someone could have gotten hurt. I would go ahead and get it. This hearing won't take place until December 11 th. If the commission concurs it is historically significant, then it also has to go to City Council, probably in January. Yeah, go ahead...at least two months. (Nacho) Now I'm afraid there could be holes punched in it that it's going to start to leak and damage more of the inside. (Unk) Those beams are expensive that are in there .... (Nacho) It wasn't leaking before... (Unk) No, the only thing leaking was the bathrooms and the kitchen. (Larry) Maybe we should go up there and put some plastic down. Anything I haven't asked you that you think I should know? (Nacho) No ..... (Larry) How are the apartments doing? (Nacho) We are having problems right now with the Blacks and the Chicanos and we are working with the people who are causing the problems .... (Unk)They're anti-social. Trying to get the people together to be social. (Larry) Get people talking again. h\LARRY\NTTHEAT2 NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only NOVEMBER 21, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB - LODGE 19 MlCMRFR ~ PAGE 1 ' Interviewer: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner and Carlos Silva, Rehabilitation Specialist Interviewees: Nacho Gracia, Ramon Vasquez, and Enrique Vasquez. From what he says, (Carlos) all of the sections have horizontal and vertical rebar installed in the existing building. What they did was on the west side, they knocked out one of the brick walls between the pilasters to have access with trucks to backfill the floor which was on a slope because it used to be an old theater ......... Convert ..... into .... wanted a level floor so they used that wall for access in to the interior of the building. Then they reconstructed it over again. They had permits, plans, the whole shot. (Larry) Great! Do you think that will affect the ......so far, as far as the estimates? That helps it a lot, doesn't it? (Carlos) Sure .....we had to read the existing report, because .... (Larry) They're assuming it's unreinforced ..... (Carlos) They're assuming it's unreinforced...(Larry) We're assuming worse case. If we're talking about a three inch cement reinforced wall barrier membrane all around it... (Carlos)..gunite wall...(Larry) Right ........ So they're assuming you are going to have to completely redo for seismic. That's why it's so expensive .... $143,000 for a new mechanical system. I think they are really high on some of this stuff they are giving you, so we are going to look at their study. (Lots of conversation in Spanish here I am unable to translate .... ) He's talking about .... beams on top. (Larry?) Both of you were saying that the same person who did the plans on that ...... Oh] Same architect .... engineer...Do you know what his name was? He doesn't know .... (sorry, loud voice, not clear, can't interpret what they are saying)...more Spanish .... (Carlos) He said it was built basically with L.A. Standards...and it was 50 years ahead of its time because they used large size rebar in the pillars etc. (Larry) The report specifically says they are assuming there in no reinforcement in those pillars and that the pillars are brittle. (Carlos) That needs to be verified by x-rays. (Larry) Mr. Vasquez, how old are you? .............. (95 years old?) How long have you lived here? ........ (since 19377). He was living at Guasti before .......... More Spanish...If you could start with some of the questions that you have..the information that you need...Did you know Raul Torres...can't interpret...Mclntyre .... What happened with ..... owned that property at one time?...Mr. Valdez/Ledesma lived in the house next to Villa del Norte, the wooden house to the west...He owned all of that property...Torres, Mclntyre .... they got together and Mr. Valdez/Ledesma sold it to Mr. Torres .... Put up the land, or donated the land...Mr. Torres and Mr. Mclntyre put in the funds to build the building. Mclntyre is the one who was eventually the owner of the DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only NORTHTOg THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 NOVEMBER 21, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB - LODGE 19 MFMRt2R .q PAGE 2 theater. Mr. Torres was related to Ledesma...(Nacho) Mr. Mclntyre set up an account at the Bank of America and sold it for $8,500... $500 down payment, $1 O0 a month ..... sold it to them 1954 .... ownership record ....Mr. Torres was the one running the movie theater .... up until they bought it .... then they took it over and used it for dances. Remodeling...1966...When they went in to do the remodeling it was 1965 or 1966 .... (Carlos) About three foot deep, six foot six foot squares, one at each end of the building, one in the center, the inspector required them to do that because they did not tear the concrete out of existing theater, so that was supposed to lock the concrete floor...build it up with sand and gravel. They dug holes, 6' square, 3' deep, and then they compacted around those areas, so when they poured concrete, those areas were left open, so that it would lock the floor in all together. (Larry) This was originally 1960? (Carlos) .... goes to 1965 .... (Larry) Was Mr. Mclntyre from the area? Was he local? Who was he? Mr. Mclntyre was a rancher, one of the financial backers. Was the theater well attended, were they open every day? (Nacho) Twice a month they had something going on as far as .... in between, if there was a wedding .... conferences .... in the meantime, they would hold meetings there. It was a neighborhood center. (Larry) Back when it was first opened as a movie and performance theater, was it well attended by the community? Two movie theaters? What year was that built, does he remember? (Nacho) When he came to California .... 1926 ...... it was every night. The attendance started to drop due to the complications, so that is when the backers decided to sell it ..... this one would remain open. Eventually there would be buses that would be put in place here and in Guasti and we would go to the Granada, the California, and the .... there were 3 theaters...there were four theaters...then we started going over there .... (Larry) Now what was the name of this theater? Mexico .... Mexico...okay. What year did the Mexico stop operating? 1960'S?...(Nacho) What happened was that pressure was put on the owner because of the vandalism and it became a hazard and so pressure was put on the owner, and we have records on when it was torn down. That was done in the 1980's. (Carlos) I was here when it was torn down. (Larry) Was it the same kind of building? (Carlos) I believe it was poured in place, wasn't it? (Larry) We're a little off the track. Does anyone have pictures of the building? (Nacho) The niece of the man that owned the place lives here, she is the one who sold us the property. (Larry) Do you think you could ask her, or give us her name and phone number and I'll ask her...It would be nice to start getting a record of everything that NORTHTOWN THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discussion PurPoses Only NOVEMBER 21, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB - LODGE 19 MEMRFlq ,q PAGE 3 had been here, and where it was and what it looked like so we can write the history of the area. I want to start gathering information. When we talk to one person, we hear all kinds of information, not just on one building. What did you do for a living. Are you retired now? (Nacho) He used to work for L & L Nursery. Before that, he used to work in the vineyards. He worked for Guasti, that is when .... (something about the railroad).o.came to Guasti in 1927, was there 10 years ...then worked in the vineyards. (Larry) Was he laying track? (Nacho) He came to the United States in 1916. (Larry) He's seen a lot of things happen...(something about what he knows about tearing it down...) (Nacho) His feelings are that he would be satisfied if we had a new building, but he would recommend you not do that. That building is a strong building...it would be better to rehab it than knock it down. That building should not be wasted because of the way it was built. It was built to last. It would be a great honor to keep it .... (Larry) That building was important to the Cucamonga community and the whole region. (Nacho) He feels there is no place like this one anywhere around that has a place for the community to have its functions. That's one of the things we talked about is that it is statewide the organizations he belongs to and people as far as from up north will come and have their functions there. (Unknown) What he doesn't realize is that if we build a new one , it will be more .... (Nacho) He says as long as it would be enough for the festivities .... that's one of the things he keeps bringing up .... smaller place would not be sufficient .... all the local lodges would use that building because of the size. (Larry) In his words can he tell me what was the purpose of the group? (Nacho) Basically it was a social group...they would help each other in times of trouble they came up against. They had insurance so that when one of them would die, they would have a $1,000 benefit. They would have fund raisers and they donated to City of Hope and to other charities. They did what they could. They couldn't give more, because they didn't have that much. It was not a business...just to help each other when they needed it. They used to have fund raisers before they rehabilitated the building. They used to have dances every weekend, and the money that was raised was used to fix up the place and also to make the payments on the building. (Larry) So, basically the purpose of the group was to serve the community, promote their culture...? (Nacho) When the community wanted to use the building for weddings, etc. They were charged $250 and that was for upkeep, payment on the 4q NORTHTOg THEATER BUILDING LD 96-03 DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only NOVEMBER 21, 1996 INTERVIEW - LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES CLUB - LODGE 19 MF. MP, F,R ~ ~AOE 4 property. They would cooperate .... if a person wanted to use it and could not afford it, they would charge him what he could afford. (Larry) The memberships, were they family memberships, individual memberships...? What was the range .... did they have annual dues, monthly dues... (Nacho) They have monthly dues. Basically it was from a certain age ..... from 16-55. You had to be of Mexican descent tO belong. If there was someone in the community who needed their help, it did not matter if they were a member or not, they would still help them. Basically, anyone of Mexican descent .... usually what happened was that if you lived in Cucamonga, you joined this lodge. If you were from Upland, you would join that lodge. Someone had to sponsor you from the group. They would go to your house and interview you, see how you lived, if you would be a good member or not. Then they would have an initiation for you. (Larry) Can you tell me what the initiation involved? (Nacho) Part of it...when they held their meetings, it was for members only. Each member had a password and there would be someone at the door. You would knock so many times and they would have to say this password and they would let you in. As for the initiation ceremony, you had to swear that you would not divulge what went on in the meetings. They you would respect the bylaws of the organization. You would then be a member in good standing, working for the community. It was not a religious organization. You could not use religious or political things to accomplish your goals. It was that way to keep strangers with a political or religious agenda would not go in and interrupt the organization in any way. (Larry) They obviously did a lot of community type events, other than just holding functions. Did they do school scholarships, community improvement projects .... (unknown person) As far as I know, they did. (Nacho) Give us an example of what you mean by "projects". (Larry) Tree planting, parkways, .... (Nacho) A lot of it had to be watched because it was politically motivated. We had to watch .... did not want political involvement...certain members .... help people cleaning their lots, streets .... (Nacho) There were two teachers who would give classes in Mexican culture on 26th Street ..... Storytelling .... (Larry) I wonder who has those tapes now .... it was Cucamonga Elementary School. Does he know what happened to those tapes? No, perhaps the school district can tell us. h\LARRY\NTTHEAT3 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting DECEMBER 11, 1996 Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer ANNOUNCEMENTS There were DO announcements. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Bethel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried 5-0, to approve the minutes of August 14, 1996. PUBLIC HEARINGS HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 96-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to designate the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater as a Local Landmark, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, or alternatively as a Point of Historic Interest, and update the Historic Resource Inventory List appropriately - APN: 209-085-04. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker asked for clarification regarding the options before the Planning Commission; his understanding was that if it is designated a Landmark, it must come before the Commission prior DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY to demolition, while a Historic Point of Interest designation would permit the owner to maintain or demolish without Commission approval. Mr. Henderson concurred. Commissioner Bethel asked for confirmation regarding the rehabilitation price of $1,200,000, while the cost of new construction would be about half that. Mr. Henderson said no. He stated the cost to make it usable again ~s between $260,000 and $300,000. He pointed out the difference is in bringing the building up to current day standards. He explained as private property, the owner has the option to make it a usable building again, rather than starting over. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there is enough parking available. Mr. Henderson stated there is room for approximately 20 parking spaces, which is far below code, however, a joint-use provision could be agreed upon with the City to utilize adjacent parking at Old Town Park. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if this solution will provide enough parking. Mr. Henderson felt it should be, with proper controls. He stated a Conditional Use Permit is required to reopen the building and will provide the Commission an opportunity to address issues such as operating hours, capacity, and types of events. He reported the YVVCA has received a $7,000 Community Development Block Grant to provide an after school program in the neighborhood and needed space can be utilized if the subject building is available within 90 days. Commissioner McNiel asked if the reported price to rehabilitate the building will satisfy all seismic requirements. Mr Henderson responded there are no seismic requirements because it is not an unreinforced building. He reported staffs inspection of the building found no obvious structural defects. Commissioner Macias asked the difference between Landmark designation versus Historic Point of Interest with regard to coming before the Commission in the future. Mr. Henderson responded in the case of a Landmark designation, any non in-kind exterior modifications or reconsideration of the designation would need to be addressed by the Commission, while the Historic Point of Interest designation would only be revisited if an upgrade to Landmark designation were requested. Chairman Barker asked if there is any financial advantage to either of the designations. Mr. Henderson reported a slight advantage to the Landmark designation which allows the use of the Historic Building Code. Brad Buller, City Planner, clarified a point brought up by Commissioner Macias and stated whether the building is designated a Historic Landmark or Historic Point of Interest, the project will come back to the Commission under a Conditional Use Permit prior to occupancy. HPC Minutes -2- December 11, 1996 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Nacho Gracia, 10364 Humbolt Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, identified himself as the Executive Director of North Town Development Corporation (NHDC). He stated the Corporation does not want the property designated as a Historic Landmark because of financial masons. He requested a 30 day extension on the matter so the board can discuss the matter -~t their meeting on January 17, 1997. He felt without financial help from the City it would be better to take whatever action necessary to open the building while minimizing costs. Commissioner Macias asked if a designation of Historic Point of Interest designation would be preferred over a Historical Landmark designation. Mr. Gracia indicated a Historical Point of Interest would be fine because they would then have the option of tearing down the building or investing in rehabilitation. Chairman Barker asked if a Historic Landmark designation will be requested in 30 days. Mr. Gracia responded in the negative. Chairman Barker asked if a 30 day continuance will be requested if the Commission were willing to rule favorably on the Historical Point of Interest designation. Mr. Gracia indicated he preferred to take the matter back to the board. He reported their intention of tearing down the building and felt a new building could be constructed for much less than $1,200,000. He stated the board is not aware of the Redevelopment Agency's inability to finance a portion of the cost. Chairman Barker asked if there is any advantage to a 30 day continuance if the Commission were willing to rule favorably on the Historic Point of Interest designation. Mr. Gracia conceded that a 30 day continuance is not necessary and asked for the subject property be designated a Historic Point of Interest. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed his hope that a plaque be created to inform the community of the significance of the building. He felt it is a tremendous cultural asset. Mr. Gracia concurred and stated the board has begun to look into the issue. He mentioned an adjacent 20 foot parcel belonging to the City and expressed his hope for its donation to the Corporation to be used for eight or nine additional parking spaces. Commissioner Macias asked for clarification regarding staff's recommendation. Mr. Buffer responded staff's recommendation for Historic Landmark versus Historical Point of Interest is determined by the "Facts for Findings". He reported that both alternatives were offered and mentioned the Commission's policy of not designating a property as a Historic Landmark over owner objection. Commissioner Macias pointed out that any new construction or rehabilitation could be conditioned to provide identification of the site and its significance to the cultural heritage of the community. HPC Minutes -3- December 11, 1996 --~..--~ DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Mr. Buller concurred and stated mitigation for the historic evidence could be incorporated into the conditional use permit required for future project. Arline Bustamanti, 8183 Ramona Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she is in favor of the Historical Landmark designation. - Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bethel felt the Commission should designate the building a Historic Point of Interest, thereby giving the NHDC the flexibility to request an upgrade designation to Historic Landmark in the future. Mr. Buller suggested incorporating identification of historic facts uncovered during this project when forwarding the Point of Interest motion on to the City Council. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated he would like the motion to reflect the Commission's encouragement for the applicant to apply for the Historic Landmark designation in the future. Commissioner Macias voiced his support of the Point of Historic Interest designation, but stated he does not feel, based on the information presented, it is economically viable to rehabilitate the building. He felt the best thing for the site is eventual demolition with appropriate mitigation identifying its historical significance. Commissioner McNiel agreed with Commissioner Macias. Motion: Moved by Bethel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution recommending approval to designate Point of Historic Interest 96-02 and request the placement of a commemorative plaque and encourage future Landmark designation if the building is retained. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no additional public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS There was no additional Commission business. HPC Minutes -4- December 11, 1996 ~ DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Bethel, carried 5-0 to adjourn. The Historic Preservation Commission adjourned at 7:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary HPC Minutes ~5- December 11, 1996 RESOLUTION NO. ~ 1"' ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 96-02 DESIGNATING THE LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES, INC. THEATER, LOCATED AT 10071 FERON BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORICAL POINT OF INTEREST - APN: 209-085-04. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Point of Historic Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic Interest is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 5, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately .36 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard approximately 100 feet west of Hermosa Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced meeting on February 2, 1997, and The Historic Preservation Commission public hearing on December 11, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this City Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fac~s: The property identifies an historic period of transition from the agrarian community to a suburban/urban setting and the activities of the minority community that thrived in the area known as Northtown. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. POI 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 5, 1997 Page 2 Fac~s: Finding 3: As the one remaining theater from the two originally serving the community it is clearly a rare example. The proposed Point of Historic Interesi was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact/s: The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for over 30 years provided needed community resources and activities. Finding 4: The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fac~s: The use of the structure by Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. for 30 years provided needed community resources and activities. b. Neighborhood and Geographic Se~ing. Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fac~s: As the one remaining theater from the two originally serving the community it clearly contributes to the variety and historical continuity of the neighborhood. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Historic Interest, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. Fac~s: The Building at approximately 5,400 square feet, represents one of the last remaining larger community serving structures in the community. 4. This City Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered eligible for Landmark designation. Therefore the City Council encourages the property owner to return for a Landmark Designation if the theater is retained and rehabilitated. 5. The City Council recommends that upon any future discretionary City approvals, a condition for an adequate historic sign or plague be required. 6. This City Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above, this City Council hereby approves Point of Historic Interest Designation 96-02. 8. The Secretary to this City Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1997. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst SUBJECT: Approval of City Policy to Recognize High School Students with Outstanding Citizenship and Service to the Community RECOMMENDATION Approve the policy to recognize high school students with outstanding citizenship and service to the community. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Last year Community Services staff was contacted by Sylvia McCune, Principal ofAlta Loma High School, regarding the possibility of developing a City recognition program for high school students. The high schools currently recognize students for academic, sports and other educational achievements. The purpose of the City's recognition program would be to recognize students for their outstanding citizenship and community service to the City. Over the course of the last several months staff has met with the principals of all three high schools and have developed the attached policy to recognize high school students with outstanding citizenship and service to the community. The program is proposed to be a pilot recognition program administered out of the City Manager's Office with certificates of recognition. It was agreed that the high schools would select the students and the procedures would be written in a general manner to allow the recognition program flexibility to be responsive to the overall needs of the three high schools. It is proposed that the recognition be made quarterly by the City for all three high schools. It is anticipated that the first recognition of students would occur in May or June, 1997. The attached policy outlines the administrative procedures for the high school student recognition program. The program recognizes that the City's youth population represents the future citizens and leaders of our community. It stresses the importance of recognition and support of our youth with outstanding citizenship and encourages involvement/service in one's community. Respectfully submitted, ~fC k,s~u'~eotaZty services Manager City Council Meeting Approval of City Policy to Recognize High School Students with Outstanding Citizenship and Service to the Community February 5, 1997 Page 2 POLICY & PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE DATE: SUBJECT: PURPOSE: CITY POLICY TO RECOGNIZE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH OUTSTANDING CITIZENSHIP AND SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY The purpose of this policy is to recognize and enhance public awareness of high school students with outstanding citizenship and service to the community. GENERAL PROVISIONS: The City's youth population represents the future citizens and leaders of our commu, nity. Its is important to recognize and support our youth with outstanding citizenship and to encourage the value of involvement in ones community. The local high schools, Alta Loma, Etiwanda and Rancho Cucamonga will identify on a quarterly basis those students who have contributed to the general welfare of their community. Criteria for such recognition will be developed by the City and the local high schools with selection of students to be determined by the high schools. Names of students will be submitted by each high school to the City Manager's Office for scheduling of recognition at a future City Council meeting. The City Manager's Office staff will schedule the presentation of a Certificate of Recognition for Outstanding Student Citizenship/Community Service for a future City Council meeting and will notify respective high schools of such date. The City Manager's Office staff and Community Services Department's staff will endeavor to recognize the accomplishments and efforts of such students in the City's Grapevine newsletter which is published quarterly, as well as other community wide media programs, i.e., the City public access cable channel, RCTV3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor Alexander & City Councilmembers Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM CHAPTER ONE OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS TO WAIVE RENTAL FEES FOR A SCHOOL BUS ROADEO AT THE EPICENTER EXPANDED PARKING LOT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City approve the request from the California Association of School Transportation Officials (CASTO) to conduct a School Bus Roadeo on April 19, 1997, at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. CASTO is requesting that the City waive the rental fee of $2,000, and CASTO would provide liability insurance coverage as well as be responsible for facility expenses required for the event. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Chapter One, the local chapter of CASTO has requested the use of the Epicenter Parking Lot on April 19, 1997. CASTO is a non-profit organization and will be conducting its local Roadeo in preparation for the State Championship Roadeo in May, 1997 sponsored by the State Department of Education. CASTO consists of school transportation directors, mechanics, driver instructors and school bus drivers from the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The purpose of the local Roadeo is to provide participants with an opportunity to practice their school bus driving and maneuvering skills. There will be approximately 75 to 80 school bus drivers who will be participating in the Roadeo. It is anticipated that there would be a minimal amount of facility maintenance required for this event. The Roadeo will be a morning to mid-afternoon event completing by 2:30 p.m. as April 19th is a Quakes game day. Staff recommends approval of this request based upon CASTO's affiliation with a public education agency, the public safety requirements for school bus drivers, and the public service provided by CASTO members to the community. Respectfully submitted, so~oadeo January9,1997 Ms. Suzanne Ota Community Services Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Dear Suzanne, As per our conversation this afternoon, I am requesting the use of the open parking facility at Quake Stadium. As I stated, I represent C.A.S.T.O. (California Association of School Transportation Officials) Chapter One, a non-profit organization. Although our chapter officially consists of the San Bemardino/Riverside area, our members come from as far west as San Dimas, east to Indio and south to Temecula. Our northern border ends at Cajon Pass. Let me explain to you who C.A.S.T.O. is and what we do. All of our members are involved in student transportation in some capacity. They are Directors of Transportation, mechanics, driver instructors, such as myself, and of course the drivers. We all work together to continue to give the safest ride possible to all students requiring transportation, whether it's home to school or activity trips. Our statewide membership comes from school districts, both public and private, as well as private contract services such as Laidlaw. C.A.S.T.O. employs a paid advocate in Sacramento whose sole job is to lobby for new legislation regarding school transportation. The new school busses you see around tom with the amber lights, as well as the familiar red lights, and the stop sign affixed on the rear left side of the bus is an example of new legislation introduced by our lobbyist that is now law and requires all school busses manufactured after January 1, 1993 to be so equipped. Some times the legislation is no more than changing the language in an existing law. Every year each chapter of C.A.S.T.O. (about 16 active chapters at this time) throughout the state holds a roadco. The participants are put through a gambit of exercises based on what they do daily as school bus drivers. The difference is that each event is performed to exacting measurements. As an example, in the parallel parking event, the curb is represented by as taught rope. A barrier is placed at each end of the rope representing parked vehicles. The length from barrier to barrier is the length of the participating bus plus seven feet. The driver must maneuver into the "parking space" without touching either barrier or the "curb". If they are successful in their attempt, they must then maneuver out of the "parking space". Each driver begins the roadeo with 500 points to their credit. Each event is worth 50 points. Points are deducted for infractions. At the chapter level of competition there are three categories: in chapter, out of chapter and novice (a driver who has held a school bus driver's certificate for less than two years). The highest scores in each category receive trophies. The individual chapter roadcos are practice for the much larger southern and northern state roadco. The southem state roadeo is held in Arcadia at Santa Anita Park. These two roadcos as well as the championship madco (the highest scores from both northern and southern state) are sponsored by the Department of Education. Laws pertaining to school bus driving am developed through the cooperation of the Department of Education and The California Highway Patrol. The D.O.E. is responsible for all training of school bus driver instructors who then train the individual school bus driver. The California Highway Patrol is responsible for enforcing all laws pertaining to school busses. The C.HP. also administers the written and behind-the- wheel driving exams for school bus drivers. The roadeo that I'm requesting the use of the parking lot for will be held on Saturday, April 19, 1997. I understand that you have an evening game scheduled for that date. Let me assure you that in the past our chapter roadeo, including the presentation of awards, was completed by around 2:30 p.m. If you think that a precedent is in order to justify waiving the me fee for the parking lot, I can provide one. Chapter 20 (the high desert) has been allowed to use the parking lot at Maverick Stadium for several years at no cost to the chapter. I look forward to hearing a favorable response from you as soon as possible. Very Cordially, Willa M. Steiner Alia Loma School District State Certified School Bus Driver Instructor #3539 Treasurer, C.A.S.T.O., Chapter One work (909) 484-5190 or 484- 5191 home (909) 945-3505 Willa M. Steiner 10849 Ring Avenue Alta Loma, Ca 91737 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-14, LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PROMENADE SHOPPING CENTER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit No. 96-14, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue in the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1996 for an Atlantic Richfield Company convenience market/gas station. The Developer, Lewis Development Co., as part of the master plan for development in conjunction with Parcel Map No. 14022 is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Chervil Street (Home Depot entrance) in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $100,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully sub~L,C7 WilliamjCZ~,Neil City Engineer k. Attachments J 8~SE LiNE Ld Z CHURCH ST. FOOTHILL ROAD N ~,o SCALE CHURCH ST , '~. (~S~:R:AFFIC ~ MAYTEN AVENUE CHERWL ', %0 EET 1 MASI DRIVE / ARROW SIGN ~,L LOCATION ,-,--,f'~.,.:;:JOIJLFVARD ,.',-'~/' ,~, " CITY OF RA~N'CE[O CUCAivlONGA ItNG~G DIVISION ~ c.U.P %- 14 RXI4TnlT:. I ESOt, UTIO q '7"' O0"f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-14 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 5, 1997, by Lewis Development Co. as developer, for the construction of a traffic signal in the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Chervil Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as Conditional Use Permit No. 96-14 and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineere/20 SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST AVENUE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $201,080.00 ($182,800.00, PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM TDA ARTICLE 8, ACCOUNT NO. 12-463%9203 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Traffic Signals and Street Improvements at Base Line Road and East Avenue to the lowest responsive bidder, J.E.G. Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $230,737.00 ($209,760.99, plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-4637-9203. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 7, 1997, for the subject project. J.E.G. Construction Company, Inc., is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of $230,737.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $210,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respect ubmitted~~Z,f William J City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachment Bids Opened on January 7, 1997 Item Item No. Description I Clearing and Grubbing 2 Sawcut & remove A.C. Pavement 3 P.C.C. lleadwall & Inlet Removal 4 Sawcut and Remove P.C.C. Curb 5 Relocate Air Release Valve 6 Crushed Aggregate or Slag Base 7 Asphalt concrete Pavement 8 8" P.C.C. Curb 9 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter 10 48" Dia RCP (1300D) 11 P.C.C. Flared End Inlet 12 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting 13 Traffic Control 14 Traffic Striping & Signing Amount Bid Unit of Measure LS LF LS LF LS TON TON LF LF LF EA LS LS LS CH'Y OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROI'OSALS FOIl TIIAFFIC SIGNALS AND ST!IEET IMPROVEMENTS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST AVENUE '-:: -' ,F:.E.G. Const. Co., Inc. Estimated Quantity Unit Price Total I $I 1,000.00 $11,000.00 I 130 $2.00 $2,260.00 ! $1,500.00 $1,500.00 200 $6.00 $ !,200.00 I $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 82 $50.00 $4,100.00 89 $65.00 $5,785.00 270 $13.00 $3,510.00 220 $ ! 5.00 $3,300.00 110 $120.00 $13,200.00 I $1,350.00 $1,350.00 I $125,595.00 $125,595.00 I $2,000.00 $2,000.00 I $7,000.00 $7,000.00 I $182,800.00 $182,000.00 Laird Const. Co., Inc. Unit Price $88,659.40 $1.50 $2,000.00 $4.50 $3,500.00 $30.00 560.00 $13.25 $15.75 $85.00 $3,000.00 $47,653.30 $5,750.00 $7,000.00 Amount $88,659.40 $1,695.00 $2,000.00 $900.00 $3,500.00 $2,460.00 $5,340.00 $3,577.50 $3,465.00 $9,350.00 $3,000.00 $47,653.30 $5,750.00 $7,000.00 $184,350.20 Engineer's Estimate= $210,000.00 Paul Gardner Corporation Unit Price Amount $12,877.00 $12,877.00 $1.40 $1,582.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $3. l0 $620.00 $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $54.00 $4,428.00 $59.00 $5,251.00 $11.20 $3,024.00 $25.40 $5,588.00 $105.00 $11,550.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $127,559.00 $127,559.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $6,430.00 $6,430.00 $186,929.00 C Page 2 Bids Opened on January 7, 1997 Item Item No. Description I Clearing and Grubbing 2 Sawcut & remove A.C. Pavement 3 P.C.C. Headwall & Inlet Removal 4 Sawcut and Remove P.C.C. Curb 5 Relocate Air Release Valve 6 Crushed Aggregate or Slag Base 7 Asphalt concrete Pavement 8 8" P.C.C. Curb 9 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter 10 48" Dia RCP (1300D) 11 P.C.C. Flared End Inlet 12 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting 13 Traffic Control 14 Traffic Striping & Signing Unit of Measure LS LF LS LF LS TON TON LF LF LF EA LS LS LS SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR T!~AIrFIC SIGNALS AND SI'REET IMPROVEMENTS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST AVENUE DBX, lncorporated Estimated Quantity Unit Price I $3,500.00 1130 $1.10 I $800.00 200 $5.00 ! $750.00 82 $40.00 89 $98.00 270 $17.00 220 $24.00 II0 $95.00 I $2,600.00 I $136,935.00 I $1,500.00 I $6,430.00 !!illcrest Contracting, inc. Total Unit Price Amount $3,500.00 $14,050.00 $14,050.00 $1,243.00 $1.40 $1,582.00 $800.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $1,000.00 $3.10 $620.00 $750.00 $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $3,280.00 $54.00 $4,428.00 $8,722.00 $59.00 $5,251.00 $4,590.00 $11.20 $3,024.00 $5,280.00 $25.40 $5,588.00 $10,450.00 $105.00 $11,550.00 $2,600.00 $2,260.00 $2,260.00 $136,935.00 $126,350.00 $126,350.00 $1,500.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $6,430.00 $8,400.00 $8,400.00 $187,080.00 $188,863.00 Engineer's Estimate= $210,000.00 Computer Service Company Unit Price $10,930.10 $4.73 $2,205.00 $5.25 $1,155.00 $89.25 $115.50 $16.80 $18.90 $100.80 $1,995.00 $124,325.00 $2,625.00 $6,799.00 Amount $10,930.10 $5,344.90 $2,205.00 $1,050.00 $1,155.00 $7,318.50 $10,279.50 $4,536.00 $4,158.00 $11,088.00 $1,995.00 $124,325.00 $2,625.00 $6,799.00 $193,809.00 Page 3 Bids Opened on January 7, 1997 No. Description ! Clearing and Grubbing 2 Sawcut & remove A.C. Pavement 3 P.C.C. Headwall & Inlet Removal 4 Sawcut and Remove P.C.C. Curb 5 Relocate Air Release Valve 6 Crushed Aggregate or Slag Base 7 Asphalt concrete Pavement 8 8" P.C.C. Curb 9 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter 10 48" Dia RCP (1300D) 11 P.C.C. Flared End Inlet 12 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting 13 Traffic Control 14 Traffic Striping & Signing cutal Bid Measure LS L5 TON 'tON LF LF LF EA LS LS LS SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND EAST AVENUE TDS Engineering Quantity Unit Price I S15,000.00 1130 $5.00 I $1,150.00 200 $5.00 I $1,500.00 82 $31.00 89 $100.00 270 $12.00 220 $15.00 !!0 $110.00 I $2,500.00 I $119,608.00 I $11,234.00 I $6,430.00 Total $15,000.00 $5,650.00 $1,150.00 Sl,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,542.00 $8,900.00 $3,240.00 $3,300.00 $12,100.00 $2,500.00 $119,608.00 $11,234.00 $6,430.00 $194,154.00 $ ! 94,284.00 Fishbach & Moore, Inc. Unit Price $19,439.00 $3.00 $1,857.00 $7.00 $2,523.00 $113.00 $82.00 $12.00 $17.00 $170.00 $3,000.00 $160,877.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 Amount $19,439.00 $3,390.00 $1,857.00 $1,400.00 $2,523.00 $9,266.00 $7,298.00 $3,240.00 $3,740.00 $18,700.00 $3,000.00 $160,877.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $243,730.00 Engineer's Estimate= $210,000.00 Unit Price Amount C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY.' Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ,.2~ SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $150,782.00 ($137,075.00, PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT 22-4637-9513 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane to the lowest responsive bidder, TDS Engineering, in the amount of $150,782.00 ($137,075.00, plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Development Transportation Systems Development Funds, Account 22-4637-9513. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 7, 1997, for the subject project. TDS Engineering is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of $13 7,075.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $120,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachment j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE Bids Opened on January 7, 1997 Engineer's Estimate= $120.000.00 Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting TDS Engineering Unit of Estimated Total Measure Quantity Bid LS 1 $137,075.00 Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Unit of Measure LS AGE General Construction, Inc. Estimated Total Quantity Bid 1 $140,260.00 Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting MBE Electric, Inc. Unit of Estimated Total Measure Quantity Bid LS 1 $147,000.00 Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Item Item No. Description 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Unit of Measure LS Unit of Measure LS Unit of Measure LS Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting Estimated Total Quantity Bid 1 $148,275.00 Computer Service Company Estimated Total Quantity Bid 1 $157,700.00 Paul Gardner Corporation Estimated Unit Total Quantity Price Bid 1 $160,763.00 DBX, Inc. Unit of Estimated Unit Total Measure Quantity Price Bid LS 1 $161,000.00 7/ Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE Item No. 1 Item Description Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting C.T.&F., Inc. Unit of Estimated Unit Total Measure Quantity Price Bid LS 1 $165,296.00 Item No. 1 Item Description Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Lekos Electric, Inc. Unit of Estimated Unit Total Measure Quantity Price Bid LS 1 $176,835.00 Item No. 1 Item Description Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting Unit of Measure LS Bischbach & Moore Traffic Systems Group Estimated Total Quantity Bid 1 $189,176.09 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Approval of Fund Transfer and Authorize the Continuance of Computer Support Services RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council approve the transfer of salary savings to contractual services to provide continued computer support for the City's computer operations. BACKGROUND On October 2, 1996 staff requested the City Council in a previous agenda item to authorize the contractual assistance of an outside computer firm to provide support for the data processing division. Staffing in the division had been reduced by 50% due to job vacancies. These are in the process of recruitment and it is anticipated that all positions will be filled by late March, 1997. Until the job vacancies are filled, staff is requesting to maintain the current contractual assistance to support daily operations, project management, and advise on managing the City's computer system. There is no budgetary impact as a result of this fund transfer. The salary savings of the vacant positions will continue to provide payment of the computer support services already in progress. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director LIT:pjm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIAL BONDS FOR TRACT 13298, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: Tract 13298 has been replaced by Tract 15526. Tract 15526 has posted security and executed an Improvement Agreement for the public improvements, which are currently under construction. Therefore, the bonds for Tract 13298 are no longer necessary. BACKG RO UND/ANALYSIS: Tract 13298, which consisted of 6 lots accommodating 112 condominium units, recorded April 28, 1992. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 15526, for 57 single family lots, in the same location. Tract 15526 recorded September 6, 1996, thereby superseding Tract 13298. Security was posted for Tract 15526 and the Improvement Agreement was executed by the City on August 20, 1996. Developer: Lewis Development Company P. O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 2294995 in the amount of $32,600.00 Labor and Material Bond 2294995 in the amount of $16,300.00 Respect~ll~ submitted, City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer ACCEPT CONTRACT NO. CO 96-016, THE NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET, FUNDED FROM CDBG FUNDS, ACCOUNT 28-4333-9316, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $198,041.00, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Ninth Street Improvement Project, Contract No. 96-016 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a maintenance bond. Approve the final contract amount of $198,041.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $198,041.00. The original amount approved by Council was $192,512.50. Respectfully submitted, williaj.~o,NeC~Z'G~7 city Engineer WJO:LB:ls Attachment J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONTRACT NO. CO 96-016, THE NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Contract No. 96- 016, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager Karen Matcham, Recreation Supervisor CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE GROUP CATEGORIES FOR CHURCHES FROM CATEGORY 5 (RESIDENT/COMMERCIAL) TO CATEGORY 3 (RESIDENT/NON-PROFIT WITH PAID MANAGEMENT) RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee recommends that Section 10.0 - Recreation Fees of the City' s Comprehensive Fee Resolution be revised for churches/religious organizations. The amendment would revise the Group Category for churches from Category 5 (Resident/Commercial) to Category 3 (Resident/Non-Profit with Paid Management). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At their meeting of December 18, 1996, the Parks and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee discussed the program fees for churches at the Founder' s Day Celebration. In the 1980's, local churches were assigned to Category 5 as local businesses. Churches are considered non-profit organizations. This proposed amendment would assign them to Category 3 as Not-for-Profit Organization with Paid Management. In reviewing the Group Category for churches, the Subcommittee recommended the amendment based on the following reasons: 1. The Churches support a large segment of the community both spiritually and socially. 2. Churches support the community and provide programs and services in a variety of ways: A. Participate in Founder's Day Parade and Celebration. B. Provide Entertainment. C. Rent Booth Space as a Crafter and Food Vendor. D. Provide Hands-on crafts for Children. E. Provide Painting, balloon giveaways, free of charge. ,j CITY COUNCIL MEETING CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE GROUP CATEGORIES FOR CHURCHES... February 5, 1997 Page 2 3. Rent City Facilities (community centers for church services) and Amphitheater rental (for religious concerts). 4. Provide summer Day Camps for church participants and city residents utilizing park facilities. There are approximately 70 churches in the City of Rancho Cucamonga which will be affected by this change. This amendment will not affect the process of field allocations for Youth Sports Group Organizations such as the Little League, Youth Soccer, and Youth Softball Leagues, which are in the not-for-profit category in Group 2. Group 3 includes not-for-profit organizations with paid management such as the YMCA and Boy Scouts. FISCAL IMPACT The change in categories would result in reduced rental fees for churches. Using the rental fees from last year, the rental revenue loss from churches would be $7,239 with churches under Category 3. FEE SCHEDULE FOR CHURCHES Category 5 $10,551.25 $458.75 $2,190.88 Category 3 $ 4,773.00 $269.00 $ 920.00 Total Reduction $ 4,778.25 $189.75 $1,270.88 GRAND TOTAL $7,238.88 After careful consideration, the Subcommittee agreed that the revenue loss is greatly offset by the tremendous contributions of recreation and social activities provided to residents of the City by churches and religious organizations. Respectfully submitted, Suza~Services Manager RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.0 RECREATION FEES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION BY REVISING GROUP CATEGORIES FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS FROM CATEGORY 5 TO CATEGORY 3 A. RECITALS: (I) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oral or written presentation may be made; and (II) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (III) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (IV) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk' s office to the public on January 21, 1997; and (V) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby resolve that the following Group Category definitions are established: Section 10.0 - Recreation Fees The following are Group Category definitions for recreation activities and rentals. Definition of classes of fees by Groups: Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group 2: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidates night. Group 3: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social, and religious organizations which has paid management. Group 4: City resident private party activity, City resident employee organizations, City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making, and rdigious organizations, non- resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations. C. Other than as expressly amended hereby, Resolution 96-012, as heretofore amended, shall remain in full force and effect. D. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 1997. AYES: NOES: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Bill Makshanoff, Building Official SUBJECT: REPORT ON THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL INFORMATIONAL SIGNS ON POLES BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council has expressed concerns about the number and types of signs being placed on poles in the public right of way. The proliferation of garage and yard sale signs was of particular concern and how neighboring cities, specifically Upland, are dealing with the problem. Attached for your information is City of Upland's ordinance regulating yard and garage sales. Briefly the ordinance limits these sales to no more than three (3) a year at a single address. The placement of signs is limited to one (1) sign posted on the property where the sale is being held during the duration of the sale only. Signs are prohibited in the public right of way. Our municipal code also prohibits the placement of private signs in the public right of way. RECOMMENDATION It is staff recommendation that the City Council review the attached information and give staff direction on the action to be taken. In addition staff will be exploring ways of addressing this issue and related Code Enforcement issues in the budget preparation for Fiscal Year 97-98. R~p e t fu lcl~~ William N. Makshanoff Building Official WNM:ll Attachment 6200.11 BU-gINF~S LICENSES, PERMITS, REGULATIONS § 6300, I Of any and all such persons who may or may not engage in any actual or purported interstate commerce. The ~erms solicitors, canvassors or peddlers shah not app[.v to commercial salesmen, agents and the like who sell or take orders· for goods at wholesale. {Ord. No. 618, § 2) 8ec. 6200.14, Apartment houae~ duplex. A building or buildings, or portion of a building, each of which is desigmed, built, Tented, leased, let or hired out to be occupied or which is occupied as the home or residence of Lhree (3) or more families living indepen- dently of each other and doing their cooking in said building or buildings. (0rd. No. 618, § 2) See. 6200.15. General engineering con- tractor. A general engineering contractor is a contractor whose principal contracting busi- ness is in connection wi~ fixed works for any or all of the following divisions or subjects: Irrigation, drainage, wa~er power, water supply, flood con~ol, inland waterways, harbors, r_~HPoads, highways, tunnels, sir- ports and airways, sewerage and bridges. (Ord. No. 618, § ~-) whose principal contracting business involves the use of specialized building trades or craft~ (Ord. No. 6J,8, § 2) See. 6200.16. General building contrac- tor. A general buRding contractor is s contrac- tor whose principal contracting business is in cormection with any structure built, being bUilt~ or to be built, for the support, shelter · and enclosure of persons, animals, chattels or movable proper~y of any kind, requiring in it~ consUnction the u~e of more than two (2) unrelated building trades or crafts, or to do or superintend the whole or any par~ thereof, (Ord. No. 618, § 2) Sac. 6200.17, Specialty contractor. · A specialty contractor is a contractor whose Operations as such wre the performsnee of constxuctton work requiring special skill and Sec. 6200.18. Home occupatloas. The p~ovisions of [Article IX, Chapter 9491] shall apply. (Ord. No. 618, § 2) ~ec. 6200.19. Yard salos. Yard sales shah mean 'any event other than a gal~s activity operated in conjunction with a regularly licensed commercial or retail operation which is advertised by any means whatsoever as a place or location to which members 'of the public, at any time, may purchase identifiable or tangible personal proper~3'; also included in this definition are garage ~,ale~, patio sales, rummage sales or any other similar sales. (Ord. ~Io, 936, § 1, 11-15-71) . ............. CHAPTER 3. BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIREI~fE~T$ Sec. 6300.1. Imposition of fees; license required; compllituee with article. There are hereby impc~sed upon the busi- nesses, trades, professions, calllnl'-s and occupations specified in ~hia article llcexuss fees in the amounts hereinafter prescribed. It shall be unlawful for any person to trannct and carry on any bLmincss, ~rode, profession, calling or occupation in tt~e City of'Upland without first having procured a license from said city so'to do or without complying with any and aH applicable' provisions of this article and the Upland Municipal Code- This section shall no~ be construed tO require any person to obtain a license prior to doing business within the city if such requirement conflicts with applicable statutes of the United States or of the State of California. Persons not required to obtain ~ license prior to doing bruincon within the city because of conflict with applicable statutes of : CITY OF:UPLAND ':""' YARD .... , , - SALE PERMIT ' ' ' "" .... THRU .. -.; .. . . , ., ;:~) '" ":"' ' ;' . . Dale 0( ProDo~'~e N~me of ~p~;csnt -- ' · ·: · . Telepn~e . . .; -.. "; (' ~ "' : ~" ' .... : "' · .: -':, .'1 ,',..UPEND "' CA '" ': .... """ · .' :' TOTAL DUE' . " , .~. $~RE ' ,. ' DAT~ . · E7'% ......;;TE~';BUS~ESS"LzC~;.~E~TS;-~G~,E~fi~-~;}~.:..7:;E: ............. ' : yard s. al'e~ .',;h~dl mean any event other ann a sales activity 't!gcratcd it~t;unjunadotl witIx a.¢egularlya(ceased comraer¢ial .... ,?r rciail-opcfallon ..which' is' advertised. by any means ',?hatsocver ps a pinOil' '6r':lOcafiot~ id ~vhi~h members of the l~ublie. al arty time. may purelm.,ie idend~al;,I¢ or tangible pc.r,~onal p!operty: al.~o included in this definition are. ~rage ~les. patio xales. ,:umm~'a~ hies o,- a,y· othcr'.Ci;tilar sales. (Drd..'No, 936. § I. II-15-71) S. EC. 6540.7. Yard sale regulations. 5 Y;~d sale~ may"be conducma' only. in:. the foliowine !' An application must mack: to :rod a permi. muse be The yard sale may be conducted only bcl,.veen the homx oF.. 8;00 a.m..and 8:th) p.m. :. ..... ...... .... . Sl~n:;~¢' is' :lhnii=d to on~ ( I Y'~n'.'pos~¢d on the. ptormtl~y . . . where the ~le is held during ~hc duratiofl 0'f the -~atc only. ;' The sign may :,or exceed two t2) rcct by two (2) f~et in size -. anti may not De placed in lhe public right of way. · - No got'xZs iflay be placed in the public right of way. The provi.~ions of this section shall 'not apply t6 'cht,|:che.~." public scheols, or charh'4bl.¢ ocgaizat;ons if the .~tle is conducted or~ the p~perty of the organization and not ht a : · .private residence. It .such sale-is conducted at ;I pri';ale rcMdence. all of the provisions of this seCtiOn shall apply.· " The tern "yard sale" as used in t.%i5 section includes lawn ~a~ ~y ~e held for ~c pu~ of I Up .~ ~ (31 ya~ ~em may k held at a single add~ss b~uin~g cxchang na or oihe~ {~e dis~osin* of unwanted i~ .'caleaa~r ~ar. "' :~" ' ' : ;' ' ' '; ..... ' ""' "':'~'su Ins'ha ' ' :P . . n~gned m~aandt~ my ~offca ~ .... ~gible pro~.af.~ ¢B~ hcjdinq Such al ' · Or sale. ' ' ' .... ~3 ' ~ ' P "~ . s ¢ , (and. No fi O ~ il 13 71 t ' ' · ' " ~ -, ' - :Ord. NO. [19t,~4,~26-'Yg:'Ord. No. ~ ¢h yard sale nay mn no mo~ tha three (3) 1, ~Se~K~; ...................... · ............ ......... .......................................... ~ .......... ].~2 ........ ~.7.. ~T.2~.~,] ..... ' ......~"'... '. y ........... "="" ............. 7 ...................... 7 ...................................... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF IIF, PORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJE. CT: February 5, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Planning Commission Memorandum: Zone Change Policies The attached memorandum has been forwarded by the Planning Commission which is requesting clarification of zone change policies for commercial land use change applications. RECOMMENDATION: Review the issues and forward the Council's direction to the Planning Commission by minute action. Alternatively, the City Council may wish to forward this request to the newly formed Joint City Council/Planning Commission Task Force for Foothill Boulevard issues. Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:taa Attachment: January 22, 1997, Memorandum from Planning Commission CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1997 TO: FROM: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission SUBJECT: REVIEW OF ZONE CHANGE POLICIES FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD The Planning Commission is presently reviewing a general plan amendment application (GPA 96-03A) to allow retail commercial on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Aspen Avenues. Specifically, the request is nearly identical to the Wohl property request (south side of Foothill, between Spruce Avenue and Elm Street) that was approved early in 1996. This application was submitted to the City in mid 1996 before the recent City Council/Planning Commission workshop on General Plan issues. In January 1996 the Planning Commission began looking at the issues of Foothill Boulevard and the rest of the City after completion of the City-wide Commercial Land Use and Market Study. Two new members joined the Planning Commission last August. Both new Commissioners have spent considerable time studying and discussing with the other Commission members the issues of Foothill Boulevard and other commercial land use issues in the City. In November the Commission determined that a City-wide field trip for all the Commissioners was important. Because of scheduling conflicts and bad weather, the field trip was postponed until January. The Commission has reviewed and processed development applications on Foothill Boulevard while continuing its study. However, the Commission believes policies for land use amendments, where development is not proposed concurrent with the requests, are warranted as we proceed with our investigation and ultimate recommendations. Therefore, in light of issues discussed during our joint workshop, the Planning Commission would like the City Council to provide guidance for the following items regarding Foothill Boulevard land use amendments. Since the City Council and Planning Commission recently established a joint task force to look at the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, an alternative option for City Council consideration would be that these policy questions be referred to the task force for recommendation before full Council action is taken. 1 ) Should the City support individual land use requests before the completion of a review for all of the Foothill corridor? 2) If we are to continue to act on individual property owner requests, should the City, as we have in the past, continue to request the submittal of market analysis (by the applicant) for each proposal to verify the long range need for additional retail land? 3) Also, should the City continue to request precise site plans and specific tenant mix programs before approval of retail commercial amendments? Your guidance on these items will aid the Planning Commission in processing this and future land use amendment applications. Chairman of the Planning Commission ~,,_Attachment: GPA 96-03A Site Map City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 96-03A RANCON GPA 96-01A WOHL N 0 450 Fcct CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Report on the Selection Process of Vendors Used by the City Background On December 18, 1996 the City Council pulled the Westek computer maintenance contract from the consent calendar and requested staff to provide a report to answer a number of questions posed. The City would continue to pay for services rendered on time and materials until resolution of this matter. After a subsequent review if approved the matter would be scheduled for the Council agenda on February 5, 1997. The City first approved the Westek computer maintenance contract in 1987. The contract contains an annual renewal clause that provides for annual review and continued service based upon performance, reliability, and no price increases. The City's purchasing manual requires that contracts in excess of $20,000 even though approved in the budget must be submitted to the City Council for review and approval. The computer contract is a part of computer maintenance services which has been budgeted in the 1996/97 fiscal year budget at $55,867. The current Westek computer maintenance contract is for the period July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. The former Management Information System's Manager (mis) when hired faced reduced staffing and 493 internal service requests beyond the ability of staff to complete, including the renewal of the Westek Contract. With his termination in September 1996 the contract was brought forward by staff for review and approval. No other contracts require renewal at this time. Westek has not been paid since July 1, 1996 but has continued to provide services in good faith and the continued business relationship with the City. If the contract is not renewed the City is responsible for the services rendered since July 1, 1996 at the time and materials rate ($85 per hour). City's Purchasing Policy The City's purchasing policy covers the procurement of various outside services with the private sector. Included in this report is informal bidding that allows the City to maintain service contracts based on standard performance criteria being met annually. An example of this is the Westek Computer Maintenance Contract and Telephone Maintenance Contract. Second is formal bidding/request of proposal in which a contract is bid generally on a one time basis to begin and 87 complete a specific job with no on-going work. An example of this would be a professional services agreement to hire an engineering firm to perform and complete a scope of work. Lastly, is a combination of the informal and formal bid procedures. An example of this is the City' s janitorial and office supply contracts that are bid every three years based on market changes in commodity pricing. Informal Bidding Policy Currently the Westek Maintenance Contract provides for a flat dollar amount per piece of equipment and travel is included in the total. Services beyond the maintenance items are billed at a rate of $50 per hour. This type of contract pricing is standard in the computer field for maintenance. Comparable services, however, in addition to flat fees are generally higher between $85 and $100 per hour with travel expenses not included in the cost. The contract with Westek stipulates that the maintenance cost covers not only repair but also replacement of the entire piece of equipment if it breaks down. This benefits the City on two fronts repair and/or replacement as an insurance policy. Staff annually reviews Westek and other contracts to determine cost variations and performance that would warrant doing business with another vendor. Originally, the Westek computer maintenance contract was competitively bid. With good performance and no increased fees the City under the informal bidding or sole source requirement of the purchasing policy is allowed to maintain the services contract without change. The compelling criteria for using another vendor would be if the service performance had eroded and/or the fee structure increased. The staff has been able to lock-in the pricing of this contract for ten years since 1987 and beaten inflation and cost of living increases in pricing compared to other vendors in the market place. During this period as you know pricing in the market place has fluctuated. The sole source or informal bidding requirement gives the City flexibility in selecting equipment, products, supply, or service when procurement is obtainable from a sole source. Technical specifications based on our needs narrow down the list of vendors capable of providing computer maintenance services on computers and printers. They include and are not limited to authorized and certified vendor services for Hewlett Packard Vectra PC's, HP printers, Compaq, Epson, Toshiba, IBM, and Novell Network Engineers. The maintenance contract includes unlimited on-site service calls, same day response time (within four hours) no charge for replacement parts (same brands whenever possible), on-site consignment for parts and loaner equipment available if not repaired immediately, 190 day preventative maintenance for printers, and annual preventative maintenance for computers (please see Schedule A). Additionally we negotiated with the vendor on-site service for an extended warranty period. Formal Bidding Requirement Where required under state or Federal laws and large projects, the Purchasing Agent may engage in formal bidding or competitive negotiation procedures with procurement exceeding $20,000. The criteria that must be met before using formal bidding include the cost or dollar value, availability of clear specifications, adequacy of number of sellers in the market place, and market conditions which ensure adequate participation. Formal bids are also required on public works projects over $5,000; contracts generally include public works jobs on City infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, buildings, sewer, and others. The Purchasing Agent maintains a commodity file and catalogs for the source of supplies, services, bid file, and price quotations. The City has conducted business seminars for outside vendors wishing to do business with the City in the past and is working with the Chamber of Commerce to again conduct a presentation at City Hall for all vendors wanting to do business with the City, probably in March or April. The presentation will provide information on the City's purchasing requirements, bidding, contracting, and a question and answer period. Computer Network Purchases In 1994 the Council approved the purchase and installation of a network computer system. The original computer purchases began in March, 1994. Each system had different warranty coverages. Personal computers and printers were purchased in May, 1994 and had three year warranties for PCS and one year for printers, with one year on-site repairs. In addition, the second and third year warranties lbr PCS stipulated that there would be no on-site repairs but that the City would be required to carry problem units to the vendor for repair. This equipment will soon be out of warranty and staff will budget for full service maintenance which is more cost effective than using staff to transport equipment for servicing and repair. With respect to the agenda item prepared by staff on December 18, 1996 approximately forty percent of the equipment listed on the attachment was purchased prior to the new network purchase of computers and printers. This old equipment is currently being serviced by Westek computers. In addition staff budgets to purchase and replace some old equipment annually. The equipment that is left for service maintenance is productive until surplused. Half of the fiscal year is gone and it is anticipated that all MIS positions including a new MIS manager (five employees total) will be hired by March, 1997. The selection and recruitment process for the MIS manager will be completed and a candidate will be on-board the mid part of February, 1997. With the new staffing a top priority will be to phase out the old equipment and begin to purchase the new equipment. Recommendation It is recommended that the Westek Contract for the current fiscal year be approved and if Council wishes to take a new look at market pricing by rebid of this contract that it be done after the new budgeted computer equipment is purchased towards the end of the fiscal year. Vendor's List Council requested a list of contracts/vendors. Please see Purchasing List. existing City vendors. Listed below are continuing City Schedule B for the Engineering List and Schedule C for the Respectfully submitted, Lawrence Administrative Services Director Schedule A COMPUTER MAINTENANCE REPORT JANUARY 13, 1997 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION COVERAGE 48 Dot Matrix Printers Full 31 Laser Printers Full 48 Personal Computers Full (older PC's @ Police Dept., Library and laptops) Personal Computers 182 Warranty - Additional On-site extended service* Services Provided Unlimited number of on-site service calls Response time-same day (generally within four hours) Vendor authorized/certified for HP Printers, HP Vectra PC's, Epson, Toshiba, IBM, Novell, and Compaq No charge for replacement parts (same brands, whenever possible) On-site consignment for parts and loaner equipment available if not repaired immediately 190 day preventative maintenance for printers Annual preventative maintenance for computers Schedule B ENGINEERING LIST OF VENDORS The following contracts were competitively bid and have been renewed on the informal bidding basis which is allowed for satisfactory service with no price increases. The Siebe/Shaw Contract for heating and air conditioning was rebid after years of satisfactory service with the City. This resulted in a significant cost increase of double the cost over the last contract. Staff subsequently rejected all bids and retumed to an on-going service contract to maintain cost control. Although competition can generate price decreases, a lack of qualified bidders can conversely increase pricing rates and represent a risk to the City's continued investment. Competitively re-bidding contracts can be adverse if there is an inadequate number of qualified vendors. Landscape West - LMD landscape maintenance Mariposa Landscape - LMD/park landscape maintenance Golden Bear arborists - Tree trimming Siebe/Robert Shaw - heating/air conditioning/energy management Merchants Janitorial -janitorial services Laird Construction - paving, grading, equipment rental, etc. State Environmental - concrete repair CITY FACILITIES ADMIN SERVICES/PURCHASING CONTRACTS This list details vendors which primarily provide maintenance services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and are sole source vendors due to territory, type of equipment, certification requirements, etc. Alert Communications - Telephone maintenance contracts for Sports Complex, Library, City Yard. Sports complex bid in 1992 with installation of new Toshiba Perception switch and Active Voice, voice mail. Since that time, equipment for all facilities standardized to Toshiba equipment due to its ability for backward and forward migration with purchase of all equipment through secondary market, which has proven to be extremely cost effective (less that half of what new equipment would be, with same warranty as new equipment). Alert has Library and City Yard maintenance contracts because they are only company certified to service Toshiba and Active Voice which will do so for secondary equipment. This year maintenance contract was negotiated down as a result of successful negotiation with Shared Technologies/Fairchild. Sole source. Shared Technologies/ Fairchild Telephone maintenance contract for City Hall switch (Lexar and Centigram voice mail) since 1990. Shared Technologies/Fairchild is only certified maintenance company in Southern Calitbrnia on Lexar and has provided service since installation with same personnel. This year we were able to negotiate a $5,000 reduction in contract. Sole source. Xerox Piggy-back off of San Bernardino County contract. In first year of three year program which is all inclusive (maintenance, machine replacement, supplies). Replaced approximately 12 older copiers with new ones throughout the City this year in an extremely cost effective program whereby we pay only approximately one cent per copy for everything with exception of paper. Sole source. Associated Group Interior plant maintenance. This was bid at time of completion of Civic Center in 1989 and approved by Council. They placed every plant and pot in City Hall/Public Safety and are responsible for plant replacement along with maintenance. Prices have not increased since inception of contract, they are thorough, replace plants when needed without hassle, work with City on insecticide application, etc. This contract has been renewed annually. One of the problems with plant maintenance companies is their short business duration (here today, gone tomorrow). Associated is one of the longest lasting. Digital Communication Office Depot Page Net Pitney Bowes Waxie Aiaouch MCI GTE Installed voice mail and provide maintenance for police. This is Active Voice equipment and contract will be switched to Alert in next budget year in order to deal with fewer vendors. Office supplies contractor. Was bid approximately two years ago when company was called Eastman. Company has since merged with Office Depot and has recently been acquired by Staples. It is now largest office supply company in U.S. This company has the State of California contract and is very competitive. City is on line with them through modem and order supplies for next day delivery. At time of bid they were only company offering this capability and have contributed to "just in time ordering" with less warehousing on our part as a result. Office supplies scheduled for rebid beginning of FY 1997-98. Provide paging services to City. They became provider as a result of West End Communications Authority bid two years ago. Mail equipment maintenance provider. Sole source since City's incorporation. Janitorial equipment and supplies. We go to bid approximately every three years. They have a two year contract with one year extension provided service is good. They have been successful bidder for last two bids and have serviced City since incorporation with exception of one bid lost to National Sanitary Supply, which lasted for two years prior to last two bids. Cellular phone service provider. We have been with Airtouch since at least 1990. We get government rate which is set by PUC. Service is better in San Bernardino County than LA Cellular, they provide replacement equipment if ours is in need of repair. LA Cellular now does this, but two years ago, they did not. Since rates are same, and service good, it becomes a question of why change providers. Interstate long distance and internet telephone provider. Selection of MCI was done through telephone consultant and is reexamined on an approximately three year basis. Consultant has verified lotvest rates offered through National League of Cities contract. Local and intrastate service telephone provider for voice and data. Selection done through telephone consultant and reexamined on an approximately three year basis. We piggybacked on State of California contract for intrastate long distance rates. With long distance companies ability to provide local phone service in approximately six months, this will be reexamined again within a year as soon as PUC establishes rates and responsibilities. We will use telephone consultant for this purpose. With rapid changes in ability of local companies to provide long distance and vice versa, GTE will no longer be sole source. TeleQuestions Telephone consultant. Selection was through an RFP process approximately 9-10 years ago approved by Council. Her fee is the lowest cost around, she has proven to be very cost effective and conscientious. She does all the work in procuring secondary telephone equipment for City which is folded into her consulting fee. We are currently working on replacement equipment for Senior Center, Lions East and West and Gemco. All equipment will again be pre-owned with full warranties. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Sandra G. Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor SUBJECT: Approval to Execute Contract for Computer Hardware Maintenance with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867 to be Funded from Contract Services Account Number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 96/97. Recommendation Staff recommends City Council' s approval to execute a contract for computer hardware maintenance with Westek Computer Services Inc. in the amount of $55,867. The amount of $55,867 will be funded from contract services account number 01-4161-6028 for Fiscal Year 96/97. Backeround/Analysis The personal computers and printers located throughout the City require periodic maintenance and repair for older pieces of equipment and warranty equipment. Westek Computer Services Inc. provides these services on hardware throughout various departments of the City. For the last eight years, Westek Computer Services has continued to provide exceptional maintenance and support to the City. Even though these services are budgeted annually, contracts in excess of $20,000 must be submitted to Council for review and approval. In the event the City no longer requires the services currently being provided, the terms of maintenance may be terminated with a thirty day written notice. These pieces of equipment are essential for the support of the City' s Network and personal computers within the City. Respectfully submitted, La~~Bc~eI~Temp]e)~ Administrative Services Director Attachment: Westek Computer Services Maintenance Agreement ,J Q 1~1 $ P'a,:,: ~tla Avenue, Fulledon, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 Q 67~2 Rsrno~ Rd,, Cathedr/C~, CA 92234 (619) 323-05~ BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. EffecUve DaIe Expiration Die Irmlad Agreeme~ Addendure # RC-96/97 7-1-96 6-30-97 Equipment Location Address CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. 909-969-1851 TEL: ITEM BIlling Address 91729 CONTACT: SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 208.f~EL: MODEL NO. DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO, CONTACT: QTY. ANNUAL UNIT CHG. ANNUALCHGS, 1 486/33M 2 IIID 3 386/25SX 4 flIP 5 *KXP1123 6 183 7 286 8 LTE286 9 386r20E 10 386/16 COMPAQ W/4MG RAM, 120MG HD, 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD, VGA DISP,AY, & KYBD. #6247HBN21058, 6247HBN20&52 2 HP LASER (KATHY J., FIN.) #3221J23398 1 BINARY PC WI4MG RAM, 124MG HD, 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD, MONIT(:R, KYBD, (GREAT/RC POLICE)Wffi26419 1 HP LASER ~3103JG1L3J 1 PANASONICAt2BMDL53'?27JD..E!~,:~~;':: ~,: :i :-')'~ :':: :::':-'. .'::r:- ' ' 1 ZENITH LAPTOP W/EXT. H.D. ~V8351225602 1 ~.. ~ NBI PC W/FDD & 20MB HD ~K:;57616162 1 COMPAQ W/640k RAM, 1.44 & 1.2MG FDD. & KYBD. 2 240 ~695HAF30616, 6019AC31740 COMPAQ W/640k RAM, 1.2MG FDD, 100MG HD. 150MG COMPA0 TAPE DR., ~4844HS440285 1 COMPAQ W/2MG RAM, 1.2MG FDD, 40MG HD, VGA DISPLAY, KYBD. 10 384 #HO280, H2549,H 1394, H2321 ,H 1713, H2519, H 1755,H2513,H 1444,1-~ 189 $768.00 $360.00 $,336.00 $384.OO $90.OO .: ~ $504.OO $252.00 $480.00 $576.OO s3a4o oo PREVENTIVE M/UNTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL X;EPTED BY CUSTOMER .~4PANY THO~IZED SIGNATURE PRESENTATIVE DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Computer Service, Ire AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE {Please Print) President Dennis Raney DATE O iF.,,01 S ."'ac- itla Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 13 67652 R ~.n..o~ Rd., CathedrN CIty, CA 922~ (619) 3~-0594 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. Effective Die E. xplratlo~ Die I~1~ Agreem~d Addendure --6 30 07 Equipment Location Address CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA 105CX:)CIVlCCENTER DRIVE RANCHOCUCAMONGA, CA. TEL: ITEM BIlling Address 91729 909-989-1851 CONTACT: SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 20~L: MODEL NO. DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. CONTACT: QTY. ANNUAL UNIT CHG. ANNUAL CHG$. 1.~ 486r~1 1, 386/25M 15 386SX 16 PC 17 486 386 COMPAQ W% 4MG RAM, 1.2MG FIX), VGA DISPLAY, 40MG HD, & h'YBD., ~1036855H0173, 4041H58H0020 2 COMPAQ W/2MB RAM, 1.2MB FDO, 60MB HD. VGA DISPLAY, & K"BD. #4032HAN20182, 4026HAN10618 COMPAQ DESKPRO. 120 MB HD, 4 MB RAM, 3.5 FDO, 5.25 FIX). DISPLAY. AND KYBD. 16226HC5205~. COMPAQ DESKPRO 120 MB HD, 4 MB RAM, 3.5 FDD, 5.25 FIX:), k. ATH CO-PROCESSOR, VGA DISPLAY, & KYBD. #4202HBR10716 & #4210HBR30527.. ,~, . ........ 2 AST BRAVO. 2 MB RAM, 1.2 FDD. 40 MB HD. VGA COLOR DISPLAff', & KYBD. S/Ns1570, 1914, 3533, 3577, NO'S TWB3052238, 3484, 2269, & 2248. 8 IBM CONVERTIBLE W/512K RAM, 720K FDO. A1-321-024712. COMPAQ LTE 4/25C, 120 MG HD. 4 MG RAM, EXT. BATTERY CI-I,a,~GER W/ADAPTER. #931HDL41334. 1 CONTURA PORTABLE 3r25c. 120 HD. 4 MG RAM, 1.44 MG FDD. #7252HCH33697. $672.00 $672.00 _ $768.00 $2688.00 $216.00 $384 PREVENTIVE MAJ NTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUAL TOTAL CCEPTED BY CUSTOMER )MPANY ~THORIZED SIGNATURE .PRESENTATIVE e~se Print) DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Comlx.,ler Service~, lnc AUTI-IORIZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTATiVE (Please Print] 'nTLE Dresidcnc Dennis R~ney DATE q7 10,01 S r:."~c ~tla Avenue, Fullerton, CA92631 (714) 526-0744 67652 Ra.~>~ Rd., Cathedrtd CIty, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594 Pg. 3 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreemenl No. Effective Da~e Expiration O~te Initial Agreement Addendure # RC-G6/97 7-1-96 6-30-97 Equipment Location Address CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 909-989-1851 TEL: ITEM BIlling Address 91729 CONTACT: SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 20~L: MODEL NO. DESCRIPTION/SERIAL NO, CONTACT: QTY. ANNUAL UNIT CHG, ANNUALCHG$. 1,o 341E* 2(: 341' 2' 321SL* 2~ P351· 2~ P351C* 2= P341SL 25 P341SL* 26 LQ2500* 27 FX-285' 2~ FX-100" 2S ANADEX' TOSHIBA PRINTER NZY14514, ZY1834,5, ZY15155, ZA12696. 4 132.00 TOSHIBA PRINTER, # ZA131284, PA16313,ZA12702 3 132 TOSHIBA PRINTER. #ZA19910, ZA43516, ZA23241, ZA19912,ZA46257 5 120 TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO. ZA34320. 1 TOSHIBA PRINTER NO'S ZA14588, ZA13983, ZA13978, ZA145~, ZA14302. 5 144 TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO..7-.~,~46249 1 TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO'S ZA16750, ZA42678, ZA46250, ZA46002, ZA46245, ZA46244, ZA46257 7 120 EPSON PRINTER. NO'S 12011833. 11015308 2 156 EPSON CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. 04011237. 1 EPSON CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. 545534. 1 ANADEX CHARACTER PRINTER. NO. UO3039. 1 $528.00 $396.00 $6OO.00 $132.00 $720.00 $216.00 $840.00 $31200 $84.00 $84.00 $204.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL \CCEPTED BY CUSTOMER UTHORIZED S4GNATURE ;EPRESENTATIV~ ~lease Pdnt) DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Computer Sen..k:~s, In¢ AUTHORI71=D SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE {Please Pdnt) 'nTLE President Dennis Raney DATE · I!,;OMPLtTtI~ITM Q 1001 SPa',:,. :tla Avenue, Fullsdon, CA92631 (714) 526°0744 Q 67652 Ramo,- Rd., Cathedral CIty, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594 E3}rltts01~tP, AH~HO~841JeN~ONGA .105(X) CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729 909-989-1851 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. EffectJve Dale ExrdraUo~ Dale Initial Agreement Addendure TEL: rEM MODEL NO, 3C 293* 31 294 ,32 83A* 3~. 192+* 3z 440* 35 182' 3~ I.Q2550' 37 FX1050* 3~ LQ1070 3~ 1:>351' 4C S-Ill 4' S-lID 4; S-IIID BIlling Address SANDY RAMIRF_.Z EXT 2082 CONTACT: TEL: DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO, OKIDATA CHARACTER PRINTER. NO'S. 3906, 607A OKIDATA PRINTER. NO. 801 A0037779. OKIDATA MICROLINE PRINTER. NO'S 23(X)78 OKIDATA PRINTER. NO. 811A1056318. TOSHIBA PRINTER. NO. 'S 20-0810710, 20-0810882. OKIDATA PRINTER. NO. 602190151744. EPSON PRINTER. NO. 00F007200.' CONTACT: QTY. ANNUAL UNIT CHG. 1 1 2 '108 1 2 '106 1 '1' EPSON PRINTER. NO'S 00D101544871, OOD1024020, 0El0' 33857. 3 EPSON PRINTER. NO. 49G0023827 (GENERAL/MAINTENANCE.) 1 TOSHIBA PRINTER. ft-PB14507. 1 HP LASERJET ~f~3104JD5782 1 HP LASERJET W/ENV. FEEDER ~r283OJ10321,2934J1 9021 2 HP LASERJET f~q33022J16530,6528,6447,6529,6531 5 7-1 -~'.~ 6-30-91' ANNUAL CHGS. $108.00 $108.03 $216.08 $84.00 $216.00 $84,0o $108.o0 $252.00 $64.00 $132.00 $338.00 $672.00 $1800.00 EPTED BY CUSTOMER )RIZED SIGNATURE :SENTATIVE ~ Pdnt) DATE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek C~mputer Seq~ices, Inc AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE (Please Print) 'nTLE Preslden= D¢nnis R.~ncy DATE 10~)1 S. P!a,::entla Avenue. Fullerton. CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 (>7652 Ra,-'non Rd., Cathedral CIty. CA 92234 (619) 323-0594 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. __ Effective Dale Expiration Dale Initial Agreement Addendum EI2il]yrr(:it~t 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Billing Address RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729 909-989-1851 SANDY RAMIRF_.Z EXT 2082 TEL: CONTACT: TEL: CONTACT: ITEM MODEL NO. DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. 43 S-I 44 486 4~ 4+ 47 53(X) 48 286E 4S 286 HP LASERJET # 2424179549 COMPAQ PROLINEA WI COLOR DISPLAY.MOUSE & KYBD. (GENJRDS #1 POLICE ~A339HER31046,A339HER31047,384,756 HP LASERJET (GENERAL/RECORDS ~ POLICE.) AUPBG062261, JPBD004906,JPFF~,JPGF007301 ,JPFH024035,JPJJ002254 SJPGK091806,SUSFB202928 HP LASERJET 4+. (LORI GEMBELLA/POLICE. NO. JPFF019370: 5 JPFH011013.JPFF014118.JPFF019366,JPFK018395 NEC PR!NTWR!TER (F!R~.~INANCE', ,SER_IAL,N0_._e72021669LX.) 1 COMPAQ DESKPRO, 2 MB RAM. 1.44 FDD, 80 MB HD, VGA DISPLAY, KYBD, S/N'S 4001HZ3H0751, 4006HZEH1366, 4816AM381312. 3 IBM XT, 640 KB RAM, 1.2 MB FDD, 1.44 FDD, 20 MB HD, DISPLAY, ,"YBD. 5162-1069633. 1 COMPAQ LTE LAPTOP, 4MB RAM, 120 MB HD. S/N 6236HBGF30224. 1 ANNUAL UNIT CHG. ANNUALCHGS. $360.00 $153600 $1800.00 $1008.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL ~CCEPTED BY CUSTOMER OTHORIZISD SIGNATURE EPRESENTATIVE lease Print) DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Computer Services, Inc AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTA'rlVE {Please Pdnl) 'nTI_E Presldcn~ Dennis P,,~ney DATE 1001 S Pace ~tla Avenue, Fulledon, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 67652 Ra. mon Rd., Cathedral CRy. CA 92234 (619) 323-0594 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. Effective Dale Explratlo~ Dale Initial Agreement Addendure 0-30-~7 ~~ IE:~~~MONGA lOr-----------------~ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91729 909-989-1851 TEL: ITEM MODEL NO, 5' 486SL 52 486 ' 53 486DX2 54 DJ 320 56 4M 57 DJ560C 56 M2 4/501 59 M24/501 60 M24/501 61 M24/66 BIlling Address SANDY RAMIREZ EXT2082 CONTACT: TEL: CONTACT: DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. NEC VERSA LAPTOP, S/N 42007670. MONO DISPLAY, 4MB RAM COMPAQ PROLINEA COMPUTER W/8 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 ME HD, VGA DISPLAY, & KYBD. S/N A339HER31375. TOSHIBA SATELLITE 320 MB HD, 8 MB RAM. W04432931 HP PRINTER. SMY49S2M031. HP LASERJET PRINTER. S/N'S USFB502712, USFBS02454. USBF398104, SUSFB399874, USFB379526, USF8399516 HP LAS. ERJET. S/N JPBGO91963. DESKJET. S/N SSC~4K152DP. HP VECTRA PC;, 16 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KvBD, MOUSE, (APPENDIX A) SAME CONFIG. AS #63 W/1.2 MG FDD. SAME CONFIG. AS ~63 W/CO ROM DRIVE. 6 1 1 HP VECTRA P, 16 MG RAM, 1,44 MB FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KYBD, MOUSE. S/N'S 343A04611, 3421::)A00697, 3420A00865, 3420A0053(, 3420A[X)521. 3420A00757, & 3420A00463,3420A00675, 8 ANNUAL UNITCHG. 72 72 72 72 ANNUAL CHG$. $576.00 $384.00 $,-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~4.00 $216.00 $11304.00 $43200 S144.00 $576.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL ;CEPTED BY CUSTOMER MPANY THO~IZED SIGNATURE ~RESENTATIVE DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Compute~ Services, AUTHO~tlZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE (Please Prim) President Dennis DATE /D( I(X)1 S Piac.': Ilia Avenue, Fulledon, CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 67652 Ra.m~>n Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 (619) 323*0594 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement NO. EffedJve Dine Explrmlo~ Date InltJaJ Agreemeel Addendure 7-1-C,6 6-3O-97 E~i4]'~ Be~I~),~blGiMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 909-989-1851 TEL: BIlling Address 91729 SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082 CONTACT: TEL: CONTACT: ITEM 6; MODEL NO. 586 6~ ULTRA 66 ULTRA 67 ULTRA 68 3.12 6,c VLS/100 7C VL3 5/100 71 5AS6 DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO. HP PENTIUM, 40 MG RAM, 1.44 MG FDO, CO ROM DRIVE, 1.05 GIG HD, MOUSE, KYBD. S/N'S 3415S00589, 3415SIX)672, 3415S00659, 3415S00667. 4 LM M2(XX) HP NET SERVER WI132 MB RAM, 13 GB ARRAY, MONO VGA, NE 3200 LAN CARD, MOUSE, KYBD. S/N 3336S(X)618. 1 HP VECTRA PC W/16 MB RAM, 1.44 FDD, 210 MB HD, LAN CARD, KYBD, MOUSE. #~41~. 1 14 IN. COLOR VGA (SEE APPENDIX B). 142 13 17 IN. COLOR VGA (SEE APPENDIX B). 21 IN. COLOR VGA ( DAN WATERS, POLICE.) NOVELL NETWARE (SINGLE SERVER). HP VECTRA PC, 850 MG, 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD (DUAL FDD), CD-ROM, KYBD, MOUSE, S/N 35IX)A00731 (LIBRARY). 1 HP VECTRA PC, RAM, 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD ( DUAL FDD) KYBD, MOUSE W3529A04289. 1 HP NET SERVER RAM, CD-ROM, 1.44 FDD & 1.2 FDD, ( DUAL FDD), KYBD, MOUSE, S/N 3417800160 (DAN WATERS/POLICE). 1 ANNUAL UNIT CHG. 72 ANNUALCHGS. $288.00 $72.00 $6816.00 $52.80 $540.00 $72.00 $72.00 $72OO PREVENTIVE MAJNTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL ;CEPTED BY CUSTOMER ~PANY THORIZ~D SIGNATURE PRESENTATIVE ~ase Prim) DATE ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Computer Sen4c~s, Inc AUTHC~IZ~D SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE {Rease Pdm) TITLE President Dennis Rancy DATE O i.o,O 1 S :~a ,: ~tla Avenue, Fulleden. CA 92631 (714) 526-0744 Q 67652 Rmm..~ - Rd., Cathedral CIty, CA 92234 (619) 323-0594 Pg. 8 BASIC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Agreement No. EffectJve Da~e Expirtdlo~ Dine Initial Agreement Addendure # RC-96/97 I-1 6-30-g7 ELq'YP~ ~]L~-Y~t~MONGA 10c-----------------~ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO OUCAMONGA, CA. gOg-989-1851 TEL: CONTACT: ITEM MODEL NO. BIlling Address 91729 SANDY RAMIREZ EXT 2082 TEL: DESCRIPTION / SERIAL NO, CONTACT: QTY. ANNUAL UNIT CHG. ANNUALCHGS. 72 40 HOURS ~ $,50 PER HOUR, ON-SITE SERVICE Coverage on items 63-72 & 74-76 are for O~-stte extended warranty service. (AI parts,labor & ravel) Total agreement price ................................$58,806.80 ** Less 5% semi - annual discount ..........$ 55,866.46 *** Less 1(3% annual discount, ..................$ 52,926.12 PREVENTIVE MAJNTENANCE EVERY DAYS ANNUALTOTAL ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER COMPANY NAME ACCEPTED BY WESTEK Westek Computer Services, Inc AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE {Please Print) 'nTLE President Dennis Raney DATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 5, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE On January 14, 1997, the Route 30 Task Force convened in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. The meeting was artended by nine of the committee members. After approving the minutes the Task Force received and filed a Staff Report on property on Highland Avenue between Mayberry and Rock Rose. This issue had been agendized at two previous Task Force meetings and was included only to see if there was additional follow-up issues. Since there were none, it was received and filed. The Task Force was then presented with a Staff Report from SANBAG on the Environmental Impact Report Re-evaluation. The Task Force was informed the re-evaluation is going forward. A Consultant will be selected within the next month with the re-evaluation to follow. SANBAG also informed the Task Force the re-evaluation process should take approximately three to four months to complete. Status of Agreements, A.cquisitions, funding, timing and phasing were presented by SANBAG. Freeway Agreements have been signed by Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga. It is expected that Upland will sign the Free~vay Agreement within the next few weeks. Acquisition of properties is going forward in Los Angeles County and on the eastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga at the location of the Route 30/I-15 Interchange. SANBAG announced that funding has now been approved for all sections of the freeway from the County line to Sierra Avenue in Fontana. It is anticipated the Freeway will begin at the I-15/30 Interchange and proceed westerly through Rancho Cucamonga. Next SANBAG reviewed the issues of sound wall design, retaining wall design and structure and aesthetic treatments for the Task Force. The SANBAG staff presented visuals depicting the various elements on the sound walls, retaining walls and structures. These issues have been processed through the Route 30 Corridor Design Group and will be submitted to SANBAG Board for approval. SANBAG staff gave a report on Landscaping Design, indicating the Freeway will be in essence minimally landscaped. Caltrans will install landscaping at the I-15/30 Interchange in accordance with the plans approved by the Design Authority and the Route 30 Task Force. The rest of the Freeway will be minimally landscaped, most notably with erosion control ground cover which will CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE February 5, 1997 Page 2 consist of native grasses. The Task Force asked when future landscaping might be approved. SANBAG replied this issue will be contingent upon funding and there are possibilities of receiving funding through Federal and State Programs, such as Environmental Mitigation. City staff, SANBAG and Caltrans all indicated they will be active in the future in trying to obtain these funds. The Task Force also inquired as to whether or not provisions would be made for future water connections. SANBAG informed them landscaping installed with the Freeway will be irrigated. Provisions will be made for future irrigation by installing connections and provisions at freeway over-ramps and other crossings. However, piping for future irrigation along the freeway will not be installed at this time but will be installed with future projects. The Task Force discussed future meetings and the motion was made and approved to have the next meeting be in sixty days. The Task Force also requested that some report be presented on the Park parking issue at a future meeting. The Task Force also requested as information is available, it be provided to the Task Force and the staff not wait sixty days to provide them with this information. Staff will continue to provide the Task Force ~vith information on a timely basis. Respectfully Submitted, Williamr~/~(/~ City Engineer WJO:dlw