Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/05/07 - Agenda Packet.........................ia CITY COUNCIL AGENDA I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. May 7, 1997 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember · ' Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 "~ City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 1 NI item submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo , Gutie'rr~z , and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the month of May as Motorcycle Awareness Month. 2. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the month of May as Toddler Immunization Month. 3. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of May 18-24 as National Public Works Week. 4. Presentation of Proclamation and certificates recognizing the Rancho Cucamonga All-Stars as the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation's Basketball Champions for the Boys 14-15 year- old age group. 5. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of May 12-19 as Business Appreciation Week. 6. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing Miss Angela Idda as First Place Winner of the Waste Prevention Essay contest. 7. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing Mrs. Dawn Granger of Cucamonga Middle School as Waste Prevention Essay contest Overall Winning Teacher. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. City Council Agenda May 7, 1991 2 1. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 1997 February 27, 1997 March 4, 1997 March 5, 1997 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/9/97 and 4/16/97; and Payroll 1 ending 4/03/97 for the total amount of $1,505,064.86. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for J. 9 Filippi Vintage Co. 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for 11 Route 66 Care, Ivan Ledford Raynard, III, 9134 Foothill Blvd. 5. Approval to authorize the advertisement of the Notice Inviting Bids 13 for the Lions West Community Center Improvement Project to be funded from the Community Development Block Grant program and the Project's reserves in the 1997/98 Fiscal Year Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 97-057 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROViNG PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval of City Co-Sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin 20 All-Star Game on June 9, 1997. 7. Approval to Purchase two specially equipped utility patrol vehicles 23 (not to exceed $60,000) for the Citizen Patrol Unit from Police Department "Contract Services" funds. 8. Approval of award of Contract and Authorization of Execution of 25 Contract (CO 97-022) to A-VIDD Co. for the Council Chambers Video Production System. 9. Award and Authorization for Execution of the Contract (CO 97-023) 26 for the Base Line Road Parkway Improvement Project, located between Deer Creek Channel and Milliken Avenue, to Madposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, in the amount of $61,1 97.00 ($73,815.50, plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9614. 10. Release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 30 Agreements for DR 84-49 located at 10900 East Fourth Street, submitted by General Dynamics Corporation. City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-058 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENTS FROM GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, POMONA DIVISION, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-49 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96- 0__2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add regulations prohibiting commercial parties within all residential zones and property used for residential purposes. ORDINANCE NO. 569 (second reading) 32-1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION, 17.02.600, TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE) 2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96- 0__4 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to enact regulations for wireless communication facilities (i.e., cellular transmission) in conformance with Federal Communications Commission regulations. ORDINANCE NO. 570 (second reading) 32-4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 17.26 THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COIVlIVlUNICATIONS FACILITIES City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 4 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 12.16 TO TITLE 12 PROVIDING FOR THF REGULATION OF NEWSPAPER RACKS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE NO. 571 (second reading) 32-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 12.16 TO TITLE 12 THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF NEWSPAPER RACKS WITHIN THE CITY 4. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96- 01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the radio and television antenna regulations in all zones to be consistent with Federal Communications Commission recent regulations. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the radio and television antenna regulations in all industrial zones to be consistent with Federal Communications Commission recent regulations. CONSIDERATION OF SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the radio and television antenna regulations to be consistent with Federal Communications Commission recent regulations. ORDINANCE NO. 575 (second reading) 33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE; PART III, SECTION IV.A.5 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND SECTION 5.4 (PAGES 5-30) OF THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION ANTENNAS, INCLUDING SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS 5. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 97-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the zoning from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to General Commercial to be consistent with the General Plan for approximately 4.34 acres of land on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN: 209-041-27, 41, and 47. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for consideration. City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 5 ORDINANCE NO. 576 (second reading) 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 97-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 4.34 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-041-27, 41, AND 47 6. CONSIDERATION OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-01 - TEXACO - A request to amend the Sign Ordinance by adding regulations to allow the identification of subtenants within service staljons. ORDINANCE NO. 577 (second reading) 43 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR SUBTENANT SIGNS WITHIN THE SERVICE STATION CLASSIFICATION F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL DRAFT CONSOLIDATED 45 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 -The review of the Federally required Annual Action Plan for fiscal year 1997-98, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on an estimated new fund allocation of $984,000 and pdor year programmed funds of $47,090. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 6 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. APPROVAL TO ACQUIRE A VEHICLE TO SERVE AS A 127 COMBINATION MOBILE 'SUBSTATION/COMMAND POST' TO BF UTILIZED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZIN~ ITS FUNDING FROM ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS NOT TO EXCEE~ $100,000 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THF 130 CONTINUATION OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR RED HILL AND HERITAGE PARKS (PD-85) RESOLUTION NO. 97-059 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE ASSESSMENT OF RED HILL AND HERITAGE PARKS (PD-85) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GNE LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATNE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. City Council Agenda May 7, 1997 7 I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 1, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours pdor to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 20, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, February 20, 1997 in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 1050 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez. Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. C. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m. to executive session to discuss personnel matters per Government Code 54957 regarding performance evaluation of City Manager. No action was taken in executive session which concluded at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: February 27, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, February 27, 1997 in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 1050 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez. Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. C. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:03 p.m. to executive session to discuss personnel matters per Government Code 54957 regarding performance evaluation of City Manager. No action was taken in executive session which concluded at 1:15 p.m. Executive session adjourned to Tuesday, March 4, 1997, 5:00 p.m. in the Tri Communities Room to interview applicants for the Central Park Task Force. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: March 4, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjoumed meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was scheduled for Tuesday, March 4, 1997, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California for 5:00 p.m. The meeting was cancelled with the Council to discuss the process for the Central Park Task Force interviews at their March 19, 1997 meeting. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: March 5, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetino A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 5, 1997, in the Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Agency Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jim Harris, Associate Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Proteclion Dis~, Dan Watters, Police Department Analyst; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Proclamations to Marc Tang and Codnne Baker commending them for their CPR efforts in saving the life of Mrs. Baker's husband. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Marc Tang and Codnne Baker. Chief Michael described the incident explaining why these individuals should be recognized. B2. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the month of March 1997, as Amedcan Red Cross Month. Proclamation presented to Jim Lawn/. B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Captain Ron Bieberdorf commending him for his service to Rancho Cucamonga upon his promotion. Proclamation and City tile presented to Ron Bieberdorf. B4. Presentation of Proclamation commemorating the Sesquicentennial of the Mormon Pioneers entedng of the Region. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Richard Holdaway and State President of the Mormon Church, John Cottom. President Cottom presented information on the history of the Mormon religion. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 2 B5. Presentation honodng the Citizen Volunteer of the Year for 1996. Mayor Alexander presented a plaque to Tony Stearns, Citizen Volunteer of the Year for 1996. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Mr. Perry, 10323 19th Street, had read an article in the paper which stated that Chaffey College was booling the high school sports teams off of their fields. He asked that the Council build a stadium for the high schools and other sports groups to use. Councilmember Gutierrez advised Mr. Perry he would look into what could be done to accommodate this situation. Mayor Alexander stated he was at Rancho Cucamonga High School last week and that they had talked to him about this very issue. Councilmember Biane asked that this come back in one month to get a report on the matter. C2. Sherry Rojo, 12477 Tamarisk, stated she would like a review of the General Plan at a future meeting. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he, Mayor Alexander, and two members of the Planning Commission are currently reviewing this matter and that a report will come beck to the entire Council in the future. Mayor Alexander stated this would be advertised so that the residents know when this is going to be discussed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would call Ms. Rojo this week with an update as to where the subcommittee stands on this. C3. Toni Rhodes and her daughter, Christy Nurmela, spoke with her new machine to thank the Council for what they have done to help her. She also thanked Assemblyman Fred Aguiar for his help and support of handicapped children. They also informed the Council about proposed legislation (AB 244) relating to people with disabilities. They asked the Council for their support of this proposed bill. The Council concurred this bill should be passed. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: February 5, 1997 February 19, 1997 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/12/97 and 2/19/97; and Payroll ending 2/6/97 for the total amount of $1,770,877.38. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Mimi's Cafe, SWH Corporation, 10909 Foothill Boulevard. D4. Approval to authorize the issuance of a Request for Qualifications for Real Estate Broker Services in connection with the sale of City owned property located at 111 N. Grove Avenue in the City of Upland. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 3 D5. Approval of Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Application. RESOLUTION NO. 97-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND OF THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT D6. Approval of a Resolution urging the local Post Office branches to fly the nationally recognized POW/MIA Flag. RESOLUTION NO 97-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE LOCAL POST OFFICE BRANCHES TO FLY THE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED POW/MIA FLAG D7. Approval to authorize the Engineering Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to submit to SAN BAG projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1998/2005 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. D8. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordedng the Summary Vacation of portions of the BeryI-Hellman Storm Drain Easements and also Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. I and Street LIghting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 2 for Tract Map 14410, located at the east side of Beryl Street and south of 19th Street, submitted by Centex Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 97-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14410, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 97-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF THE BERYL-HELLMAN STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET AND EAST OF BERYL STREET RESOLUTION NO. 97-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 14410 D9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Ligh~ng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review No. 96-21, located at the southwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and San Madno Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Co. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 97-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 RESOLUTION NO. 97-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 D10. Approval of request to award balance of term of janitodal agreement (CO 97-006) to Janitodal Technologies Incorporated of Tustin, California. D 11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 13565-5 through 13565-10, located on the northeast corner of Summit and Wardman Bullock, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 97-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10 D12. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the ILetter accepting the responsibility for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Matedal Bond received form the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and file a Notice of Completion for DR 94-04, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park. Release: Release the Letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency accepting responsibility for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Matedal Bonds RESOLUTION NO. 97-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 94-04, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF OLD TOWN PARK, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK · ' MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carded unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add regulations prohibiting commercial parties within all residential zones and property used for residential purposes. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 5 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 569. ORDINANCE NO. 569 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION, 17.02.600, TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE) MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 569. Motion carded unanimously 5-0. E2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to enact regulations for wireless communication facilities (i.e., cellular transmission) in conformance with Federal Communications Commission regulations. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 570. ORDINANCE NO. 570 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 17.26 THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 570. Motion carded unanimously 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR INC. - An appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve a request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium Subdivision Map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoda Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoda Park Lane -APN: 227-091-14 AND 15, and 227-111-12 and 13.' Staff has prepared a mffigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for consideration. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 96-13. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Jim Banks, Jr., representing the owner of the property, Eda Ellena, stated the project complies with all zoning, planning standards and regulations of the City. He felt there was no need to overrule the Planning Commission's decision. He stated in 1991, the density was lowered to 17 units per acre. He continued to state there is now a chance this will be down zoned again because of political pressure. He felt the project is suited for the zoning of this area and also a proper use for the neighborhood. Mr. Banks stated they are building less units per acre than was originally planned, so he did not think City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 6 them should be an impact on services the City provides, such as police and fire. He also referred to the Victoda Community Plan and the General Plan as they relate to densities, and added they have tried to keep the densities low. He stated he had fought density issues relating to the Etiwanda Specific Plan at one time also. He felt the people that are fighting this should use their energy better by going to the Council/Planning Commission Task Force to voice their concerns about densities rather than just complaining about one pafficular project. He felt they should focus on changing zoning and planning laws in general. Chuck Buquet, representing Mark Taylor, stated this was approved by the Planning Commission on January 8, 1997. He felt the project approved by the Planning Commission deserves approval by the Council. He told what benefits it would have to the community if it is allowed to be built. He stated the project meets or exceeds all requirements of the City. He gave some background information on vadous zoning and land use changes that have occurred over the years. He also told what projects surround this particular one, and that the density is lower for this project than other neighboring projects. He stated the City has placed traffic regulalion requirements per the CEQA report, but added that traffic problems will occur in this area whether the project is built or not. He also presented law enforcement statistics and information about firs sewices. He also mentioned an appraisal report which the Council was given a copy of. He concluded by informing the Council that representatives from Mark Taylor Company were present to answer any questions the Council might have. Nancy Waynor, 12368 Dove Tree in Victoda stated this project is something she does not want to live with. She did not want to close the door to development, but did not agree this project should be built at the base of the Victoria Community. She asked why the Council would approve this project with all of the impacts it would have on the community. She did not feel the design was compatible with the Victoria Community and felt there would be addiljonal traffic in this area if the project is approved. She felt it would increase the already crowded schools and parks also. She also felt this would damage their investment they have made in their homes. George Skogland, 12737 Calmea Street, stated he chose Rancho Cucamonga to live in because of the quality of life he felt was here. He stated he felt the project by Mark Taylor was a high density project and did not feel the quality of life would still be there if this project was approved. He requested the Council deny this project so the quality of life for Victoda would remain high. David Tom stated he had spoken to the Coundl before about the traffic on Base Line and East and felt this project would increase traffic in this area. He stated this project was of great concern to him. He stated he was also concerned about the education of his children if the schools were to be impacted by overcrowding them. He was also concerned about the quality of people that would live in this project. Arthur Marinello, 12385 Dove Tree, stated that previous meetings held to discuss this project were almost like dots and that the Council should listen to the people that elect them. He indicated he did not feel the statistics were quite accurate, that they can be made to say whatever you want them to say. He did not think the Courtall had enough police officers already and did not think the apartments would help the situation. He felt the schools would suffer by the approval of the project. He also brought up there was no more room for portable classrooms at Windrows School. Sherry Rojo asked if this was a "done deal" and was this wasting everyone's time by going through this. Mayor Alexander stated it is never a waste of time to listen to the residents and this is not a "done deal." Ms. Rojo mentioned the City Attorney stated it could be denied if it was deemed incompatible with the area, and felt the design was incompatible for the Victoda area. She stated it does not go along with the country theme of Etiwanda. She did not like the locked gates and red roots. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 7 She commented that the project does have tot lots for the children. She asked if there were going to be any more parks planned to accommodate all of these people. She commented on the traffic problems around the schools near them. She wondered about entry access into the apartments and would traffic beck up on Base Line waiting to get into the project. She asked the Council to vote no on this project. Emanuel Ramirez, Huckleberry Court, stated he was previously concerned about the appointment of a Planning Commissioner which he felt was illegal. He commented that Mr. Buquet, when previously on the Council, was against apartments, and now because of money, he is for this project. He felt the project will generate additional cdme. He stated Commissioner Tolstoy was the swing vote and that he did not think he should have been appointed to the Planning Commission and felt it was illegal. Mayor Alexander asked the City Attorney if this was illegal when Commissioner Tolstoy was appointed to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term. James Markman, City Attomey, explained the process that had taken place for this and added it was not done illegally. Mr. Ramirez felt there would be additional traffic problems if this project is approved. He did not feel this project. should be approved when it was already a problem. He felt their area was getling projects that other areas of the City did not want. He did not understand why the City wants another project that would create more traffic, crowded schools and police problems. He stated the residents want the Council to know that they are against this project and that they are getting very organized. Wade Frasier, 12502 Nasturtium, stated what attracted him to this community was the design of Victoria. He did not feel this project fit in with the Victoda Community. He stated he did not want to say if he was for or against apartments, only that he is against the design of this project and that it did not fit in with Victoria. V'~oda Wassco, 6559 Redbud Place, stated she had pe~ons with 600 signatures from residents in the area against the apartment project. She asked the Council to put importance on the signatures. Candace Fowler, 13205 Catalpa, also had 20 more petitions with signatures against the project and felt the Etiwanda area was special. She stated she was very concerned about the apartments. She stated she had Dan Watters of the Police Department give her some cdme statistics which she reported to the Council. She felt there was less cdme around the Albertsons Center as opposed to the Lucky Center because there are no apartments around there. She also reported on the overcrowding of schools that would occur if the project is approved. She stated she did not feel the Council had a vision for Etiwanda. She also commented on the traffic problems this would create. Jennifer Marinello, 12385 Dove Tree, commented on the overcrowded schools and the traffic. She felt year-round schools might have to happen again, and this would rob the family. Toni Rhodes, 10151 Arrow Route, Apt. 143, stated she works, has strong family values and is an advocate for people with disabilities. She stated there are a lot of seniors that live in apartments and are upstanding citizens. She stated this bothered her to hear all of these people put down people that live in apartments. She stated traffic and crowded schools are concerns of hers also, but asked that people not be put down because they live in apartments. Patrick Collins, 6596 Eljwanda, stated he was a Planning Commissioner for another City and knew of the pains they go through. He felt the Council has to approve what is good for the betterment of the community. Mayor Alexander asked if this project is part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 8 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated it is part of the Victoda Community Plan, not the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Mr. Colins stated this project was not designed for Etiwanda. He felt this project would hurt the neighborhood because of the traffic problems. Brad Umansky, 7269 Infermo Place, stated he is involved in commercial development, not residential. He stated it is tough to build in Rancho Cucamonga. He pointed out that anyone that builds here is going to have to do top rate work. He felt there would be good amenflies that would go along with this project. He did not appredate people puffing others down because they live in apartments. He felt the Council should support high quality development. He did not feel cdme necessarily came from apartments, that it came from people anywhere. Frank Williams, 10356 Mahogany, also of the BIA and the San Bernardino County Cdme Free Multi- Housing Program, felt the Mark Taylor Company puts out high quality projects and that they are a leader in Phoenix. He felt this project would create construction jobs for the city and would also create economic activity for the City. He stated he felt it was a high quality project for the community. Millie Glenney, 6580 Etiwanda Avenue, stated there was no disrespect to apartment owners. She stated she was confused as to why this is not in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, but that it is only in the Victoda Community Plan. She stated they came to the Council as a community and hoped that the Council would act as to what is best for everyone. She stated Mr. Newton of Etiwanda School Distdct was opposed to the project. She did not think Mark Taylor cared about the community. She felt the community would be destroyed by this project being built because of the problems it would create for the community. She asked for the Council to vote no on this project. Rex Morris, 12442 Columbine Way, stated the reason he wants to live in the City is because of the quality of life here. He commented on the crowded fields and the large number of groups who play on them. He wanted to know what is being done to help the existing problem of field usage and felt this project would add more to this existing problem. He stated he has heard the Victoria Lakes project is going to be built. He stated he hoped this was not true. Jim Frost, 12996 Victoria Ave., did not think this project was good enough for the Etiwanda area. John Fowler, 13205 Catalpa, felt this same project is already built in Upland and felt the Council should take a look at it. Julie Devereaux, Security Management Business, felt Mark Taylor is a very good project. She stated they am involved in the multi-family organization that Frank Williams referred to. She wanted to let the homeowners know that the tenants am screened before moving into the apartment complex. She felt this project would bdng money into the community. She felt there is going to be housing needs because of the new development in Ontado and Fontana. A resident (did not give name), felt the people in favor of the project are going to make a lot of money on it, and felt the residents have a lot at stake as to what goes in their area also. He felt it should be sent back to the Planning Commission because of the design problems. He also felt traffic was going to be a problem. James Banks stated he admired the residents' passion and hoped they would carry it forward. He stated there are rules and that the rules need to be followed. He felt the residents were asking the Council to ignore the rules. Emanuel Ramirez stated he is not asking the Council to violate the rules, and did not want the Council to make this a "done deal." He asked the Council to please consider what the residents want. He stated he is against the project. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 9 Resident (did not give name), commented on an article from the Daily Bulletin that talked about cdme. She felt there was no pride of ownership with apartment buildings. Dan Glass, 12480 Corriander Court, commented on Rancho Cucamonga being the 7th safest city as compared to El Monte being higher on the statistic scale. Ken Reel, V'~oria area, asked about the eucalyptus trees being removed for this project and wondered why they cannot be removed in the parks. Wade Frasier inquired about the architecture for this project. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this project did go through design review before it went to the Planning Commission and that it was determined that this project met the qualifications for this area. Primo Morales, 8210 Malvern, pointed out this is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not Alta Loma or Etjwanda. He felt the City needs development and did not think the quality of life in the City would change just because of this project. There being no further response, the public headng was closed. Mayor Alexander called a recess at 10:36 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 10:50 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. Councilmember Curatalo stated he was impressed with the magnitude of the public outcry, but stated he did not agree with many of the things that were said. He stated Millie Glenney asked not to ignore the voice of the people and stated he would go along with the appeal. Coundlmember Biane stated he would like to know what a developer has to go through with a school distdct to get approved and what fees are involved, etc. James Markman pointed out that the appeal does include the design review process. He stated the City has always considered what the impacts would be on schools. He stated in the 80's the BIA sponsored legislation for developers to pay a school fee so that the City does not issue permits until the developer had paid the school fees. He added the City can also make a developer join a mello roos district to tax more to pay for school facilities. Councilmember Biane asked if the Etiwanda School District could charge a developer more of a fee than another school district. James Markman stated yes, but that all of the school districts charge the maximum already. He stated Rancho Cucamonga was hurt by this legislation, where a city like Brea was not. Coundlmember Biane asked for Joe O'Neil to comment on traffic flow at Base Line and East and also Foothill and the I-15 Freeway. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, commented on the work Caltrans is doing and stated that hopefully by Monday work will start for a signal at Base Line and East and that improvements will begin at Foothill and the freeway. He stated he hoped this would be complete within the next 18 months. He stated there will not be an offramp for the Route 30 Freeway and East Avenue. He stated Day Creek is going to be extended to go up to the freeway for an offramp. He stated if improvements are made, the developer will pay his way to help make these improvements. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 10 Councilmember Biane stated he was concerned if this would fit the Etiwanda area. Bred Buller, City Planner, stated if the City Council did not like the design aspect they could direct this beck to the Planning Commission with direction how they would like it to be done. He stated the Planning Commission approved this because the construction matedal would last for a long time and be durable, but that if the Council wanted something else considered it could be referred back to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he appealed this, but that his vote was not set in stone. He stated he appealed it because there was a lot of public interested in the project who did not like it. He stated he wished he could have had more notice and information about this project when it was in the planning stages. He felt the project should look more like development in Etjwanda. He felt the City needs to think about what this project will be in the future. He felt there were issues if the City could afford more police service and more recreation. He stated the issue is if this is good for the community. He felt what is right for the community has to be decided by the people in the community. Coundlmember Williams felt Jim Banks said it best that people should get out and try to fix what is broken. She stated what bothers her most is the design. She stated she understands the maintenance issue, but felt something should be done about the design. She suggested that the palm trees be replaced with eucalyptus trees. She stated she did not like anyone suggesting the Coundl had made up their minds pdor to the headng. She stated the City loses money when a resident moves in because of the services the City has to provide to them. Mayor Alexander stated the Council does not sit up there to be popular. He stated he felt this should be continued for two to four weeks because of the information presented. He felt they should try to do some of the things to make everyone happy. He stated he is in favor of the project, but is willing to wait awhile before a vote is taken. Coundlmember Biane stated he felt the apartments have come a long way in the way they used to look. He felt the developer has done everything they are supposed to do. He did not think someone should be punished for following the rules. He stated he supports the project, but would like to see the design changed to fit what Etiwanda looks like. Coundlmember Curatalo stated he is sitting as a Councilmember because he is representing the people, and that because there are so many people present for this issue who are against the project, he will not change his mind and still wants to deny the project. Coundlmember Gutierrez stated he felt the Council should vote on the project and then talk about the design later. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there are options for the Council to consider: 1. Continue the whole matter. 2. Approve the Resolution as presented which would approve the whole project including design review. 3. Approve the Resolution with an amendment to paragraph 7 which would approve the appeal or deny or reverse the Planning Commision on design review and send the matter back to the Planning Commission changing the architectural style. 4. Sustain the appeal and deny the project. He stated to do this they would have to do the following. He stated the Coundl would have to tell him and staff on what basis they wish them to write a Resolution which explains why this project is being denied. He stated in order to do that he would have to know what it is about the project that caused the Council to deny it. He stated because of 25 years of legislation you cannot just say it is because of the good of the community. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 11 He stated there would have to be a negative finding under their own statute telling what the basis is and where is the evidence. He stated then they could write a Resolution of denial. RESOLUTION NO. 97-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE VACATION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH AND THE EAST COLLECTOR STREET KNOWN AS HANLEY AVENUE, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 96-13 WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13 RESOLUTION NO. 97-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227- 111-12 & 13 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to deny the appeal and that a more focused and indepth EIR be done regarding plant, animal and police services. Motion failed 2-3 (Alexander, Biane, Williams voted no). MOTOIN: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve the project but to continue the design portion so that it is more compatible with the Etiwanda area, and for this to be sent back to the Planning Commission. James Markman suggested that the Coundl adopt Resolution No. 97-029 amending paragraph 7 on page 169 so that it would read as follows: "Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I through 7 above, the Council hereby approves the application other than design review, subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-01. The decision of the Planning Commission on design review is reversed and staff is directed to return the matter to the Planning Commission to consider a design more compatible with architecture represented in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the adjacent neighborhoed.' Motion carded 3-2 (Curatalo, Gutierrez voted no). G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 12 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ISSUES (A) STATUS REPORT ON THE TRAVELING VIETNAM MEMORIAL PROJECT (B) UPDATE ON THE LIONS CENTER EAST AND WEST PROJECT (C) REPORT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF A VAN TO BE AVAILABLE AT THE SENIOR CENTER TO TRANSPORT SENIORS FOR THE NUTRITION PROGRAM (D) UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE "Y" PROPERTY NEXT TO MILLIKEN PARK (E) REPORT ON THE PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE Coundlmember Williams felt they are getting a bargain on The Grapevine, but asked if the staff could check into the van issue and look to Citylink to see what other cities have done. ACTION: Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Biane asked if there could be a report to come back for the Council to discuss the possibility of starling to prepare for landscaping along Route 30 Corridor. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the JPA is actually trying to address the landscaping, not only the approval process, but the phasing of it. He stated it is every city's intent that there be some enhancement in the landscaping to go along with the base portion for the freeway. He stated Caltrans would also be interested in what everyone is wanting to do. He felt instead of the Task Force, the best place to direct this would be the JPA because they are working through the landscape design technical issues at this point and would be coming back with a recommendation on that. Councilmember Williams felt this was a great idea to start this. Brad Buller stated there is a technical JPA meeting coming up and then a policy meeting the following month and the landscaping issue will then be discussed. He stated they are looking at grants. He felt the Council might want to let them have a couple meetings of discussion so a more complete report could come back to the Council. Mayor Alexander stated if anything is done on the freeway, the Task Force should be notified. J2. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested the Chaffey College stadium issue be on the agenda. He would also like the cdme statistics for multi-family apartment complexes to come back to see what can be done about it. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes March 5, 1997 Page 13 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn. Motion carded unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: II II II II II II II II II II II II II 11 II II II II · -~ I1!l II II II II if II It II ~ II II ~ II II n II II II 11 I I I i II II (:D 0 0 ,0 0 O00100000 II I-; II ~ 0 0 ~ 0 00",-*0['~000 ,=,O'Or'-O-O,=,OfilO('rJ('~-OL'~if) OOOfflO:)C'dOOOr.,,Or,,O00(.~O r,,-It.[:ll . · -,lln,'ll . . q'll<l:il 011::III II II fl 11 ~ It F-- II II ~ II II II II /'.,,"'. .."',,/",r", r"'. Z If II /", /". /", r", .*"'. /". :) II II n ..".,/'.,/'.,/% /'.. 6..111 II tl I! II r.J I I I I I 1:1: I 1: :1:1:1; 1 II II IJJ I1 II 'T' a:) r,- o r,- r,, 0- N il 0- 0 ("1 if) q' 0 II II U Z li II M V V V V V ~ W,I .J .,}Z..O I1 II 0 -/ 0'1 .J &LrJ D~,~ II II W.I [.~ Z ~ CL n,',ff. fi II 01 IJJWJ~-~ U /U1 (J(j LU IJJ (fJO LW DWJ\rJ L) IIZ II _1 rJ &EL_JZIZZZ I:~lfJ3( U3WJ ZZfi"IZ:Z G, ZZ G.Z ZL~ IIO II n ~ (DG.a,~)Du~DD ~J~L~L~-,~JDD~J~D~)CLDD~) ELD ELODG. L~[L~L~D 4:00 II~ II CL ) WJD::)~I~(.r)La-~ IJJ,-'IuWJU_IUW-W.U'JU'JLk. LU::)W.I.k. WJ ::)La. rY ~ ilI-- II D t- ~ ~r.r) rJ')OwJ W. ILW 7Jn'rJ,-,l~.~W.IW.I LW~4UIWJWJ,.4 U11~ D ~U1n"Z~LLIZ:WJ I--n.' fi0.. II rJl Z LU J LWIZ_.IIZIZ O& ~)a..)n"lZ:_l,Jn',J n'n'.JWJ n"U'JZ~Hn' ~:LW ~U1~W II~ II ~ 0 [Jl [:l,l~ll~l_J 4: InW. i>n~Dn~ 4:4: nWJ nr, JLtJ WJO U3 WJIn.'WJZ( 0--.n IIff II Z T' Z Q. urJ\ZZZZ nDU(~:WJrJ'JWJZZZZZI~.UZZnZUZWJ~-,ZI. WZr. JU _1 I!U II O ILl ~ I~ DZZ.JOOOO UlZW.Ir.r} U']OOOOC::)DZC:)O::)4:ZC:)I~I-OnOZ I.-Z4: O >- rr IIr. rl II ~ U'J H Z U'} (.114:4:(,.~,-e,=e.~ n- <I:U'J O ~,..w~-,s-wLI14:-.w~[.r})4:s-..w 4:~ I-- O IILW II I'- r"r'W.I C:) 0 ZZ,-~I-Ull-.I--' (,~Z .,IZ~'I--I--UIU11-- ZI--I-' C::IZI--C.:~IZI->-I-'ZZWJZ ~ L~ III~ II <%: D ~J T' Z LWWJWJfJ<I:U}4:<I: ,J U IIII W.I ~ [ n ~ L) I--I--ZL,WLWWJ~ DrJ11--~rJt-.ILLIW.ItuI. LIL&JUI--LuW.iCJ I--W.I~UIWJ:I::WJI-.Ja..I--~DWJ II~: II n,' T' WJ I'- "wZZ<l:lZI. k. IZrr II~ II n, ~ rj I-. Z:: OEE~-n~G.n~r~ II ~ II It~1 U IIII Z II II U _1 II II II II C:J G3 - I- ,tii ,- U o ~- 0 a: m o II II _J Z ~ ~ L.) ( ~J3 cJ II II rY n,, II II _J Z Z b- ~-~ ( I ~ n U'J U II 11 ~ >' ~ :D 0 ) > I~ Z 11 II ::l:: rJ ~ El") E .r~ L~ ~J II II U Z ,_J 0 [: n W.,I _1 :::) ~ [..r) I-- C.~ II II ~'~ 0 ~ Gtl ~ ,J (J O ( Z N U Ir ~ ~-~ :~ LU II II 4: 4:rrZ _JW- tYr,~tjJ>- ) _.1~-~ WJWJ Dn~- OLJ II II ~ )- T.J'T'UZ _JC0 LU .,-~IZIZ< I-~ ILl , Z~<I: II II 0 U1 rj HIJ. lrJ 'rW, I _.10 i~1~1..-~1,11 ~:U::} U1 . '(Z) II II H m ~ rJ >- I:l::F-E~ ,T'4::4:: rJ~Z)[C~_l n"Zl::::14::~l.-4:Dr. JD~'~4:: ~r..ll,--, <%:r,fLr14:W.l II II O m t-- 3 LW!~:J:I--OI-- C.~ '1- I:ZIZ~Z_,JrrZ ,ll, Di~n,'lJJ'~ >-O. rJ . , WJI-- , ZLUrrrr II II U ~4 n- In, r,.} I--[.I1 , rdLWJ.<~ OI,UEO G.Z -D Z"(C.O>U14:_JZWJrrLWLW - II II LW ~ ~ ~-,-,OZr.)>-D - DIU~U_I:]::ZU) C~OU) - ,-, -Zm .nOV OtUrr~:Orr II II IJJ D ~- ~J ~J r~,_JOZUII:DI.W O~--'I~44:L.~UIZ:{U [~:O...Jn,'( LWOl--~-wn'rJ:lI. Wn'n' ~-DD~ IILU II rJ 0 I-- n,' I-- 4: ~-~-.~ (:::)C:3I.- rrU.]WJtul~lrr >-U.IULUIuT'I--Z'TxZ II4: II n,,'Z >' "1"' I~r.,J[::ll.l. IC.~Q1,--~Jl]r~'$'~ZZQ..rr<l:4:4:<~4:l.W,.-,p-~rrrr II II II II IIrYII CU 0~ ~ I)' I)' ~P'-ryq'U'J-41)'q' HO II O' O) .,0 ~ ~ I'-~t""l',~,,..~L"v),.-~O NZ II q' ('J ~1' .,-., Ifilfir~ -.0~'1-0-0 .,.~fdC"']~qq"rd.,,O,.Oq"~....Oq ,.O -O q" ,=:t' -.0~ II) II II II II II If II II If II If II )1 II II If II Pd II II II II II II II 11 II II (3 I1 II IL II II II II II II 0) 0' O'O'C) OOOC)CIr,.FIt"d-OOCIOC)GIO, OOCIC) CI .-,O00CIOOCIO,,.~O0-OC) MO'MOOOCdO0 II 1~ II Ot"'ll O.OC1CICICIC),O~I'-~CIr~(:)I3CICII~I'dlI')OOOO .-.,()OOCIC)OrnlZI,..,fiCICIC.d ..OOrlOOOC'dO0 I',. II lr II o- ~ ¢, Nc0 ~O-4r4nomr-:~N.~nO~Ommn~aj.0~ ~0~0r~n~0.:rd.4n~.0.a ,t.-;~O~O~-on ~ II n- II - ~1' II'I: II ,,, 0 II '1 II II II I,~ IIII II II t-- II II ~ II II I~ II II tl II A Z II II ~ n- II II I1:;I II IIII IIII f, Jll I I 1 IIII W,I I:1' II II if' \ II II I ~ ,,0 II II I ~ ~ ,~ f,J'l ~ --- II II (3 II II ,I I- Z II II V V U'I V 13, f,J 0 r,- II II ',/ V r,,l V I1. t'(J3 0' II II ~.," V Z V ~ I-- I II II D ¢[ ~ II II 0 CI'J fJ"J f,,13 f, fl ,J I- (,I Ill LW I-- CJn- I II II f..f'J Z I~1 I.IJ n,,q. II II Ill N f.J ff'JUfJ'Jtu WJ (J ¢J m lilNZ WJ lilZlillil ILl '1':I IIII J ,J )Ill C.J IIZ II n ~ rrI,IJWJLW :ZI~I~ IIO II I:L m WJb-UU I),LIJILI:LIJJZ_JIJJ WJ Q ~ NO, (1.1-11. el. LUZ(fl ~OO II~ II D U3 n- N III--II U3 n- Z:>)'Z: I--I:Z: IIG.II LI. IZ...IOII::II:p""~ IJ'),Jl[) )ZO_l .J :[: W.IZ Z I"'111,I:: > ¢ ~"DZt'~ 0~-~n IIrrII {,JI.J ~Zl--f.00"JOZZZZUl~l¢13. ZZZZ ._1 11U II ZZ Z~OO '~--OOOOZU3Z OOOO OO }-WJOO~-OOn'--I-OU3ZO ZlIIZZ WJZ--O > It II(flII <1:4: IL~"'I"t-CI'J t-- 0 IIIJJII ZZ )-~-,I/1 UlllLul--l--rJ'}l--'~'>.lill--[.rll--l.l}l- I--I.--1.I.I ~ I.~ III;;III tJJWJ ..Jn'lJ'JO<l~-~/<l,l:U'l<l:lil_l_lllU3¢l. rJ¢ ¢¢1I _1::)¢¢1--¢¢O01',¢; WJ¢ WUWJWJIZI--_In"¢ il 1' II ZZ t--I~JLI-OI-II..*=~IZlZll-s""~ZI--*"'"~Q..I.klZl.k. II:¢JiZ~ 11 LI.I I1 NN zmo.'z~.:z::uuo.',-,zzoouou~uuw z-uuouu.~mDu~,.-,u II~ II I:'I' l"U~ll. lflO(l'J)llItn~-wl'lr)nnllnrr'l"~ II 11 II II II II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II II 0 U II II Z 13 t- I- II II I::} II II ~ t- II tl IJ'i 1-- I-- . . u ~l ~ ¢ u D >- II II >~ O .WJII1 l/).,In'G, J_ln' <I Z rr0 -I--_IJ I- II II Zf, l I1;;H')lrl~:l ZI-13,:D ~'~l-O II II <~O WJ~- Z II 11 IZ.U'J ~-~1--0,~0 NO7' F,.-I-,-NI-.... I"'- >" <C <[ O~C) O .n W. JWJrr'LQ II II ]~G'~ ¢rrl--.U U Zl- O~31--WJ _1 it-- WJ U3 rr'~ I,-; n,',-~lill-- U¢ .Or.,t'JU~t""tW..I II II CI<I 'lOCI II II U 13.(jI.~.tZ::W.I IJ'}llllZ:l"""WJq: II II .j OrrU'JOll~Ur, IDrrO¢ll.'lZU On-¢O II II )'CI I.~Ci II II ¢n,, U ,I--DIJJH II II _11,- ,~ t---Z(lb.'l II II UZ r.,n..JlWJ Cl~lll~llZ~-~lrlI , ,~ ,liilll ~ ZZZN_,I.WJ > , I:tJ . , W,I_I_I IIII O Z_I(~I'~:I~II--LLII; H',~"'t'b,..q~:l,,.-13~l..m.l-.-ZZrt3 _J~dl3E -OOO:ll--i~>¢(l) D(flO0¢ IIII <l:¢J OW. IOHU'IZ IIII Z ~'ZCIIINCINIIt!'=)CI_IIt_II-I-Z I WJt'~3 ,i-- III,.Q II OI-- {I--){Clt't--l~( II[ II rrl~l 1,1II G. tr<~lJJOl~lN~-~[JZn'l~r~'123,JOO(IjJ II4; II OO D<l:lLIlillllH~"'~",n' I II II II II II13~II Orl II~O-.w0-1Alllq'FlCdO0~,-,wtfil:1011')lfilAr',,l~.O(Ill~r III;;Itl 0'{'3 l'd,--~l~-~Hl'd03F3F3rdC'd,-wC1,-4Q) ll31IIIIl~~ II) fl II II Ii II II tl II tl I! II 11 C'1 II II II II II II U.I II 0 II 4: II I::i. II II II 0000~00 ~0000000000 ,O00000000~O001)..-,O~04)OOF~O000~I.~ II )...; O00g'},-,O0 ["}13:}O,('~"JOOOOruO I~Oe"JO('dltJOOfiJOO~r~OffJllordOt'jJOOirJr,,,otr}oczjp,. r",- tl i: II 0-. ~ ~rU~OO r~c~4~rdmm~4~o ~O~O4}rdoon~r~c~o~noOnjo~o~nor~r~ OIl't II I1 11 ~ II II f- II ~: II II Z II ~", r',, _~ II II 13. K,, ,/'~ n- II II :i II II '~' II II ~ I I I I 11 1: :I: I 1: 1: 1: 11: I 1: II ~. II il I- 0 0 II I:Z: Z II II V O ~ 0 V C) r'., II v C) uJ Z ',,/ ~ Q.. .'. ~ (}'. II II 'v',..r. H H ',/ U'J H U') '.~.' ~t.- I H a...J I-- Z · } Z ,0 II II f,. Pr C) ~ u .~(,"", II r.0Zl3. O u U"J 13::~ ~ 1 (.JIZ: I I! tl WO~ n ~0~ IJJ) Z: _1 I"3: II )~n- "- <1: U'}C:i 1:31.t.I _4)I:::iZ LI. IO ujrj3 ZLIJU'JL0 rJ IIZ 11 n"ZO Z IZi U. lZ Z'-"'JI3.1Z:Z~-~ ~Z i:: ~n'l. iJ_l Zl'l~ IIO ~ IJJr31~. O ~0 r,J~ ::)_J<I:Q..I.L,I:)I--J:::)rJ"JLI,,I _101[: ~-~_J ~'-,:::) I--n,' IIa.. I1 .JU,IZ Z _lt, J IZ:IZ: IZ::::)IJJ Ol:I:s' ::)n"'~Z).l.l.li:::n"l:Z:_l~U'J0,. O~-~n tln,, II ZZZ:ZUJZn Z rZZZZZZZ) 1~.4:C.rJl. f}ZZ L)~="~ZG. ZO,-~l~OOO_O~,O~ ~. . u GaGGuam, o~u~ooooooo~ ~eu~ o o~u~z~o- u~oz~-mm --o:~ou~ e )' I~ II~ tl ~~O~'r ~t~lG~""'~~l:l:: ~ ~JOs-,(.ll~O. ZCrJ'J~l= G.~,,-~G. uJOl~.l:i.~l--~l~. I-- O II~ I--I--I--~-n'l--B3 r. OUJ~'l--I--I--I--l--I--~l~. )'l/'JZI--LUI--<I::LUZt. MI--01 <[:l--t--~-,>-~Z t,J 'J:'>,- >,.F- r.~ II Wl.I. IWLu I~IW LUZI~UJLULuLULULUUJLU UI~-I~..I~.W_.IUJI~ILI-- UJLuI--U31.LI::)U:]:4:I--,-,,-,UI~-,UI ILIJ II~ II ntn'{Zrr';'n'iZ:l L~::)';'Q::IZ:~"rrrr'r,"(Z:l--,.-'~b..,"*lZl:l..l:l::l::l~-,Z..Jl:~L"'~Zl~n"[,l"JGr}l-Z I I ~.-.,I.--';"'I--~--l:Z:: II II II II II II n,.' tl 11 (:3 Z H II Q I-- . a:: Z"'r ~ II II Li~ ~-' (J f,J Z I.U ~II Z M.I ~ 'r Z II e_u e~l~ ry r,;lrY ~ II II I~1 0 I~ ~ 0 i~. L~ ~ O i:: II II 4: Z 12, O ~- Z ::) T' r.~ >- ),- >- I-- I.IJ II D 4::J Z U ,-, I.D 4: ~ II II I:::lI' 1.1,,I ,,,-, :) n I- i,- (:l:: "~ O Z Z Z )' II ( -Z ~ Pr ~ _1 UZlJ, I T rJ"J::):::}::)~ II II n- ; n,' I-- ~' .,I W ~-~ N O. I::l CO 0 O C:) II II I-- ~ ¢ >. / Z Z: U3 n.' 0::: .,I r3 O_ _~ .J L4J 0 0 Z II T > WO Z_I ¢< --r~l.l,I tY O ~ ~ U.lZuJ, .2 OOOOO~J n- U II II I--I-- _1 C3\ >l~l _l.J UIZI U,I U )- ZI' ) IO::)t-<l:U r. rJZZZZl:l::_l:::)_l ~-.~_l fi Z~4:_J~U NI-- tJJ::))"-'UJU I:[1 1-- I'- :il-- 0 Uf'JI:Z::/~''' ~*"'~-'~-~::::}<I:I"'¢U'J II II IJ. II:::IZI~IC~N r, JO 0<[~1--')~-~-, l::}>- Z>' 4::::} 12,~-~4:I~I.~I:Z:I2::OI:::iI:21::II:II--L) ZZ:4: H C.)::)~'<'::::)~ · n'II-ZO,_lIJ.I :Z:~Z ttn.- ::)~ ~0 .J::)[:U ~.4:1:::3 Un-trn-n..~ W,-,O UO ii II Z"')I-- IZ:_lr, J <1: ¢~: OJ - 04: I. UOU'JO{:~ g'J ¢0 :::}lJ.I '<'I.U ¢¢~::¢Z .>14.. H II ) - -I-- Or} ZI- .C} .U.I_I ~ f,J¢ I--(.D~-.,rrn'l--r.3N *'-~O.hf.~tY'lZ~lZrf::::)<l:l.l.l,,~H I:Z: . Ii >.LUt-.U1 , . ¢0 -IZ> ->.)_J -_1 1.1.t~1~uJ ~.-,ZI.I, IHZ i. UOr. t}f.t}ZLUw~ULUU~,IZ J IIuj U'JZZ"<'C~nt . :S::n'LUJL) n,'n-~:LU~I:U ~-, ~Zr'<[rrZxl:i ,=,r, JUJsdU'}T' _lU.4.Jn'tJ IIi::: II >l:~OUZ:]:f' rflZ:>lZO"~OZJrF I.~..l:~Z¢/l:Z:l~JO¢::)~'f'Z>mml-I:l~ZZZZZ¢Z>-¢ D~''~ II<C ~u~-'OOOO - <<W~OC~OO u uOO L&..J~""I"4::4:'-"'-"'r~'{Z: ¢¢'-~001:~ (¢(4:<CLI. II.U'~'f'C:} On ~ II IIn,. 0',C)["'1,...,~'1....,....-~..0~t"'d~t'~t"d~..0t"'3r'-C'lt10~r'dq'O-q"OO-.-,i"~G0,-,O.O~"C'd~'~q't'd..-.,,.-.,--,~..00~ rdC"J IIO II ¢lf) P'Jrdg')I/~0'-I'-.COOl')lt)lr~l..ll'lll~lRr..,,rdq'C"Jrd,Oq'r',.r".-O4),,...~l--r',,P,,.,-~P-C~l,0-dP3-01:D~O~Fd~ II) If 7 II II II II II It II II II II II II I1 II II q' tl II II tl II II II f-J 11 II ~ II 11 O, II II iI II II II 0000~000..0~0000..0 '.-,O,.~OIDOOOfi. iO-~ Cd II t--; tl O000r~OOOO{"lfllO000 r.- II ~ tl o- . <, nn~;f~.~f~O~;~;r~Of~Ord OOo~fuOo~f~d ..-, IIn,; II .x:l' II<{ II ,.~ 0 II .:I 1l II II II II I~ tlII I-- IIII ~ II II I:~ IIII I! II ':~ II II .."'., :) II II 0, n,' II II IIZ II Cl:C1:1l~l~0"1~'0'0'0'0"0"1~0"0'0000000000-.,.-,.,,-, tln,- II )l~lfllfilfllfl~lfllfilfilfl~l'llfllflrfilfllfilfllfiifii~lfl~~~~~ II~ !1 IIII tlII U I 1 IIII IJJ '~ IIII 1" I~ IIII U 0 I~ IIII ,0 \ IIII , ~ '-' II II U Z II II > 1.14 LI.iV CI r',, II II ff I-~ H ',./ Z I'- 't' ~ 0"' II II ill _1 ..J"'./ { I- I II II fJl 1~. I~. ,i I- U Z -0 II II I~. n T r,J n.- I II II ~ CJ'J ~ [.f} f.J"J f.~ Z n..' ,~. II II t ~ (J1 T ~ ~1 Z O~::O II II CrJUlltJU1 {J1~D~LIJ I--UJi.~rJ ~ (/1 U~LIJJU1 I~l <1:30 IIN II i.i.l.i..Ll. lrU. il.~l.i.~l~.rJ n..n..n I--n,' IIQ. II n,-n.,n,,n-I--Jn-n, U'J),LI. IUlrJI:D ),.~_In'ZIZ;tI1,JIZ;ZU1 L~{~JLiJ tl~ II fJ~l~ t.~ n-I- f. fJ 0,.-,1~. IIff II ZZZZIjJQ. ZZUZI~Ii. IJZZ Tn.' ZL~ZZZZ[:Z .J IIU II OOOO Z) OOZO(I)'r'OC)LIJ I--LI,I)-OLUOOOOLIJO t-- O IIIJ.i II J--I--I--I--{Jl I--I-ZI--lr'LIJI--I--( 0 ~.-,I-- I--~-rJ) l--rtl-- ~ IJ. III~1 II 4:(~:<[LtJIJJ((i, h14:n'f.3((rJ IIII u~u~L&I~r(.)UJLIJI-LUO(~JLIJU) LLI~L:J~LtJLIJLIJL~ICIL&I IIZ: II n"n'n'n"r,3~n"n"Zn"b..I--n.'~ IIIJJ II UUUUC) h-UU~'~U~"~(J'JUUT' 0'Jrr<[Un,'UUC]Ue-eU III'- II I, UtJ,II,ULIJft'b, IJJl, iJ(t,~ZOl,iJl,lJ(~,-~,,,~lJJl.iJIJJUJn-I,l,lljJl,l,I IIH II r'rn'n'n'nOrrn~l:'l~)n[Zn'_l >(J3_ln'nrrn,(3. n,'n-rr II. tl IIII IIII IIII IIII II I!II tlII IIII IIII IIII U IIII ~ II II _1 U ILl (/) U'J U II II ~ f. rJ s.-, ~ IJ.I II II .J ~ < ( ~: U 0 LU IJJ U ii . < {Jl I- U3 U _J z u1 u 11 II ~ >' U rj1 Cl ~ II II _J -IZL~-I'OI,LluaZ II II C)~--,O C3 n'~C) n'nl-I-( U II II Zn"_l Z )-IJJ 0 (<1:_1 U I--O0~)~,.JI,tJ II II rr(<l: ~ rr~U) rrb..U),w..e It II ~"l'Z~-en' (%:I--L,I. II"I.~IUUI-- LI.. .n"~.,~lJJ~'t'(fJ II II U'JOrfI. U T'~-*IZI--ZI--OOU) II II QLI. ILIJ '~OZ:)(U)fJ)IJJ UUI--I-- _1 I II II C~ , t-- Z Q. IJ.I I- (/) 0) n- ,( U) , Lu O U II II ~l--Z -OUOIJJ 01 IIII IZILtJ(rtZ~""'~Ul-I"r)'n"t"~Ql~)"' (Z:Zt.I-IU4:I- r'I, MUJ IIII ZZ~'C31,1,1Zn(t~""'re-'~I.t, IZZI.I,I I.i, ll. IJ_l III.t.I II LL,IZ,JJ Tt'r'~(:(z.h-I--~:(::_l <[Zn"~'l--.,lIJ.ilJ, I II,r II l,lJ~"'~:~))"U1UO[.lllrOe'e~'-~_ll_l I/1C.~n'kLIU3_IT'!'UJHIJJ II4: II t'-H<[<l~[Z31JJ'T~'eOrtZZnn<l~ IIZ II UllOI--t--l--t--I--I--l--I--:::):::)::)::l> illi iiII ii13::ii ~lx~l~G]Oi~t'Jixfill~l~Cd ixrd030~rdFlfint~ IIO II P',l'-I',.r'-.Ou'~r',.IN,-,r'.,iv}Cl}r,-r,,fd IIZ II 0'0"0'0'll~,-e0'0',-,et(~!"U0-0..~r rd 0'0'0'0-0,0-C'1 IILUII II) II IIII c ~ t r t o. N t A DROPPING P;~TN_E_~ APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 301976 1132014 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Receipt Number ......... Riverside, CA 92501 Geographical Code ........ 3615 (909) 782-4400 Copies Mailed Date 4/8/97 DISTRICF SERVING LOCATION: J FILIPPI VINTAGE CO C't~'ol Z ~ Name of Business: RIVERSIDE ,O ~ ' ~''~ Location of Business: Number and Street 12467 BASELINE BLVD ' :tarlOt; % ~ City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 [~ 'O/iq;~O0.}Ott~,~ SAN BERNARDINO County Is premise inside city limits? Y E S Mailing Address: (If different from P O BOX 2 premise address) MIRA LOMA CA 91752 If premise licensed: Type of license 02 20 Transferor's names/license: J FILIPPI VINTAGE CO 301976 License TYPe Transaction TYPe Fee T~tDe Master DUD Date Fee 1.02 WINEGROWER STOCK OWNERSHIP NA YES 0 APR 08,1997 $100.00 : 2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND STOCK OWNERSHIP NA YES 0 APR 08,1997 $100.00 : 3.99 BEER AND WINE IMPO DUPLICATE NA YES 0 APR 08,1997 $.00: 4. 02 WINEGROWER RENEWAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 08,1997 $67.00 · 5. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND RENEWAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 08,1997 $34.00 TOTAL $ 301.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act. or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALLFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date APR 08,1997 Under penalty of perjur~, each person whose signature appears below, cemfies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this applicaUon on its behalf; (2) that he has mad the foregoing and knows the contenLs thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer applicaUon or proposed transfer ~s not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injur~ any creditor of ransferor: (5) that the transfer applicaUon may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ~ . ,7/L/~~- . J FILIPPI VINTAGE CO BY: Joseph Paul FILLIPPI/Pres. Attached 231 & 227 ABC 211 (5~96) /~ .~ c " t t t ~i~iN t ,~ DROPPING PARTNER APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) 1'O: Department of Alcohol'to Beverage Control File Number .............. 330251 Receipt Number ......... 1132503 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date .... 4/10/97 4.;~.F / Issued Date o/ DISTR/CT SERVING LOCATION: RIVERSIDli; Name of Business: ROUTE 66 CAFE Locanon of Business: Number and Street 9134 FOOTHILL BLVD City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA/ 91730 County SAN BERNARDINO Is premise inside city limits? YES Mailing Address: (If different~'om 13643 PRECIADO AVE premise address) CHINO CA 91710 If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License TYpe Transaction TYPe Fee ~rDe Master DuD Date Fee 1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 APR 10,1997 5300.00 : 2.41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 10,1997 $205.00 3. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 1 APR 10,1997 $39.00 : TOTAL $544.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain an~, "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which sKail be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORJNIA County of RIVERSIDE Date APR 10,1997 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporaUon, named in the foregoing appUcation, duly authorized to make ~is applicaUon on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made arc true; (3) that no penon other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this applicaUon is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to sadsly ~e payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Departrotor or to gmn or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of cransferor; (5) that the ~xansfer application may be wiLhdrawn by either the applicant or rite licensee with no resulting liability to the Dcpaxtment Applicant Name(s) Appli. ' LEDFORD RAYNARD IVAN III .' t ign~ ~BC 2 I I (5/96t // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer B Y: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT OF THE NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND THE PROJECT'S RESERVES IN THE 1997-98 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET RECOMMENDATION That the City Council authorize the advertisement of the Notice Inviting Bids for the Lions West Community Center Improvement Project which will be funded in the 1997-98 fiscal year budget from the Community Development Block Grant Program and the Project's Reserves. BACKGROUND Plans and specifications have been completed for the renovation of the Lions West Community Center, located at 9161 Base Line Road. Improvements of this facility will include the addition of 1,645 sq.ft., providing a new accessible plaza entrance, lobby, and craft room. Renovations will also include modifying the existing men' s and women' s restrooms, expanding the existing kitchen area, and providing a ramp in the Forum meeting room to access the stage, as well as other minor improvements, to meet ADA requirements. Site improvements will include the re-paving of the entire parking area, removal of several landscape islands, construction of new tree wells and landscape fingers, and new parking lot landscaping, irrigation, and lighting. The lot will be re- stripped to accommodate 109 parking stalls. Staff is requesting authorization to advertise the Lions West Community Center Project at this time so that the project will be ready to award and renovation can begin as soon as Council approves the budget in the new fiscal year. The Engineer' s estimate for the improvements is $948,000. Respectfully submitted, William 1 City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. q 7-" ~ 5 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER*RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" The majority portion of this project is Federally financed by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (24 CRF, Part 57) for the purpose of providing improvements pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and is subject to certain requirements including the payment of Federal prevailing wages, compliance with "Section 3 - Affirmative Action Requirements", Executive Order #11246 and others. The aforementioned are described in the "Special Federal Provisions" section of the bid documents. Additional information pertaining to the Federal requirements is on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community Development Department. Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 17, 1997, sealed bids or proposals for the "LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" in said City. /q Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, marked, "Bid for Construction of LIONS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT." A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the Lions West Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. All prime Contractors are required to have a representative attend and sign in a the pre-bid meeting. Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder' s proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the pre-bid meeting, Section 3 requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the required Section 3 documents in the bid proposal. Award of the project will be contingent on the content of these Section 3 documents. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, in consideration for the award. MINIMUM WAGE RATE: Notice is hereby given that this project is funded with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and that the rate of wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic employed under this contract shall be not less than as specified under the U.S. Department of Labor General Wage Decision in the locality in which the work is to be performed as modified within ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date as required under the Davis-Bacon Act. Notwithstanding the conditions hereinabove, the Califomia Labor Code Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 & 2, stipulates that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in the locality in which the work is to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of Califomia shall be paid to all workmen employed. Where a discrepancy exists between the federal and state prevailing wage rates, the policy of the Califomia Department of Labor is to require that the higher of the two prevailing wage rates shall apply. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of /5 the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight joumeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each:workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be retumed to the lowest bidder. BONDS: The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies fumished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to fumish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be fumished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Dated this 7th day of May, 1997. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7th day of May, 1997. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC,City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7th day of May, 1997. Executed this 7th day of May, 1997, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: May 13, 1997 and May 27, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CITY CO-SPONSORSHIP OF THE INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN ALL-STAR GAME ON JUNE 9, 1997 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the City's co-sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All-Star Game on June 9, 1997. The City has co-sponsored the All-Star Game for the past three years with the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and Valley Baseball Club. As a City co-sponsored activity, the rental fee would not be assessed and the City would provide maintenance staff and facility support for a practice game as well as the event game as is normally provided on Quakes baseball days. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has received a request from the Valley Baseball Club and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin to co-sponsor the High School All-Star Game on June 9, 1997. This would be a fund-raising benefit for the Bulletin' s "Send an Underprivileged Kid to Camp" Program. Staff recommends approval of this request based upon the benefits to underprivileged youth in the Inland Empire. This event would also provide promotional opportunities to encourage Inland Empire residents to enjoy events conducted at the Epicenter. FISCAL IMPACT City expenses for the benefit event would be offset, in pan, by ticket and concession revenues received from the event. Respectfully submitted, 1997 AH*Star High School Baseb~!! Game Proposal: A collaborative agrceme~ between Quakes Bue, ball. Inland Vafley Daily Bulleli and thc City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide an lrdmsd VEIls,/All-Star High School BasdNdl Came- Game to be held on Monday, June g, 1997, 6:30 p.m.. Ticket Sales: Ticket prices will be ~.00 for green box Nits (reset,veal). $2.0G for red sun sad blacher (festival seainS). A Special "two for one' co~poa offer osisneral admiuioo licksIt edvsum.sai~ will be mmte available to make tbe event a~Tordable for aLL Net proceeds fi'om the gmne to go to the Daily Bu!!etio Send a Kid to Camp Punt Schools wig be: Amlsusd0r Christiu Postam Ayala PoeaM A.B. Miller Bordtm Oresdin Cmlvw/BqXist LmVane Lutham Claremoot Ontarlo-Chtstlm i)mniea Poreohm Don Lugo Rialto uplssss w~ Teams will be oa a North South split with I-10 being the dividing line. Some adjustmenu may need to bc made to make teams even in teem ofawoilment. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin will provide: * Player Llabi~ty release * Eketonic mt print mah notification. * 5election process far the 46 pieyea mad 12 cow, bet (Joint Sireroam to be notified of ~eleclion meeting.) * Four Umpirm * UmmaYml ticket sales at Daily Bu]l~n Lobby. * A specai prim w. tia published prior to the Same. * Player Recognjtioo Paclmgz fro' each player and ~ Paclmls wil] include, hal, commemorazive bill,. mrti~cate mi phmn met s R___-a~oo re, the play~ ~ parere, sal coaches. * In piper aclvertisin~ to promote the m~nt (appmx. valuz $7,000.) * An advertise' spomm~ pmc proem for the event to be Ziven out at the lame. * Printcol unmavai tickets fix the game with one ssJvesfisa' on the beck , On Site Pmmedic Staffing * Name recognition of tll collaborating pmmers'on pdnted nameEta mt introductioa of the sponsors the eight or the: Esme. * C_re,~_~tials -photo and Ixe. ss, * Pr~pme md post-game covaale d lime event. Quakes Baseball will .provide'. , visitor Locker Room fix the pine. * Announcing Booth md annowscer fur t~ game, including bond olX~or. * Box scats f~x visiting baseball scouts (not to extzat 30). * Two s~ boxes ftt the use by the Daily Bulletin. *Prcss Box. . Open concession rends and ~kes Gin Shop dudmS ~ pan, (no liquor sales). * All-Star teanu mad coredtea invjt~ to at Qudn hon~ ~mam and miralace the ~cams in fl~ lamBsuse activities. * Promotion of ticket ulem. * Ticket salu through Quakes Ticket Office * Two way radios ftt field to'iiiKum staff communication. * Nationat Anthem Singer. * Usbas. ticket taken and ~tnc day pasoand. * Post game refreshmetn soda's and hot do~ fro' pinyen and cmc~followiq the game. * Provide full !cc~Jntjns for fickct tak{ with dar/in the mount of the tickct sales. Request of the city of Rancho Cucamonga: * Waive fees for the use of stadium and pinkinN amea on June 9, 1997, Ticlrzt sak4* to bc ccm~nned with the city am wai plat to game. If advmce sales eaxxed 5,000 in nuxnber, parkinN will be pmid by the Dm*ly IiuJtetin in an an~unt not to chad $3,000. · Provide stadium for playcr lxac~cc on Satinday Jmum 7. *Anzn~f,x sccu~ty at thc stadium on game night. , Maintcunce md clean-up of the stadium. * Prepping {h~ field law md post-gazrm. To: From: Date: Subject: Memorandum City Manager's Office Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manage~s~_. April 23, 1997 Utility vehicles for Citizen Patrol Unit Background. Rancho Cucamonga's successful Citizen Patrol Unit is in need of additional vehicles. Two specially equipped utility vehicles are proposed, one of which being of a size capable of heavy duty use pulling utility trailers and other equipment that needs to be hauled. Funds will be utilized from the Police Department Contract Services Fund. Recommendation. Approval to acquire two specially equipped utility vehicles for the Citizen Patrol Unit in an amount not to exceed $60,000 from the Police Department Contract Services Fund. TO .' FROM.' SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .lACK LAM, A.I. CP, CITY MANA GER ('lit OF RANCHO C UCA310NGA RODNEY H. HOOPS, CHIEF OF POLICE RANCHO C UCAMONGA POLICE DEPAR IMENT ACQUISITION OF VEHICLES Approximately three (3) months ago, a proposal was submitted to you pertaining to the addition&urchase of two (2) vehicles.for the Citizen Patrol Unit. You approved the proposal and subsequently, the Purchasing Department has completed the research and bid process. A light-duty utifity vehicle will be obtained for an amount not to exceed $2 7, 000, and a heavy-duty utility vehicle, based upon a '~iggyback" hid with the Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, will be purchased for an amount not to exceed $33,000. The vehicles will he purchased utilizing "Contract Services "funds that the Police Department has sm,eddurmg the 1996/97 fiscal year. I am requesting that this item be placed on the City Council Agenda at the earliest possible convenience. RRH/IH:Irg J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst, I Approval of Award of Contract and Authorization of Execution of Contract for the Council Chambers Video Production System RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of contract to the A-VIDD Co. and authorize the execution of the contract for the purchase of video production equipment for the City Council Chambers. The total purchase price for the production system is approximately $94,660.53. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Purchasing Department advertised and went out to bid on March 10, 1997. Approximately three (3) bids were received, one was a partial bid and the remaining two were complaint bids. A-VIDD Co. of Long Beach, California was the lowest local responsible bidder. Ke~ectfu!ly Submitted, ?enn2f r-jmyyar~a ( ~anag'~mb~alyst, I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN DEER CREEK CHANNEL AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, TO MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, IN THE AMOUNT OF $81,197.00 ($73,815.50, PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 21-4647-9614 RECOMMENDATION: It is recolmnended that the City Council award and authorize tbr execution, the contract for the Base Line Road Parkway Improvement Project, located between Deer Creek Channel and Milliken Avenue, to the lowest responsive bidder, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, in the amount of $81,197.00 ($73,815.50, plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9614. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 15, 1997, for the subject project. Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid ,'unount of $73,815.50 (see attached bid sununary). The Engineer's estimate was $75,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp3ot~lly submitted, Willtffm J O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachment · U > 0 < < < © < > < Z < < U U Z m ~m m ~ ,m mm DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 7, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENTS FOR DR 84-49 LOCATED AT 10900 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUBMITTED BY GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements and authorizing the Mayor to sign said releases and the City Clerk to attest and present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements were approved by City Council on the 2nd of January, 1986, and recorded on January 23, 1986, as Instrument No. 86-018983 and 86-018984, in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The Agreements were in-lieu of construction of median islands, irrigation and landscaping for Fourth and Sixth Streets at the time of building permit issuance for a three story office building. Since this time Ordinance No. 526 was adopted by the City Council approving Development Agreement 94-01, for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, and subsequently approved Parcel Map 14647, recorded October 25.1995, as Instrument No. 95-369354, Official Records. The improvements identified in the Agreements were superseded and conditioned by the Development Agreement and Parcel Map 14647 to Parcels 2 and 5 respectively, thus eliminating the need for the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution w/ Release of Lien (2) VICINITY MAP PARCEL MAP 14647 METROLINK z ~ I1 LOCATION IN QUESTION .- STREET ----[.% FOURTH STREET CITY OF IL~NCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP 14647 RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7 -~! 5 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENTS FROM GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, POMONA DIVISION, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-49 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 86-01 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements from General Dynamics Corporation, Pomona Division, for the property located at 10900 East Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements were recorded on January 23, 1986, as Instrument No. 86-018983 and 86-018984, in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements are no longer required with the adoption of Ordinance No. 526 approving Development Agreement 94-01 and recordation of Parcel Map No. 14647. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreements from DR 84-49, and authorize the Mayor to sign the releases and the City Clerk to attest and present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING A NEW SECTION 17.02.600 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE). A. Recitals. 1. On December 11, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 96-72, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On February 19, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Section 3. A new Section 17.02.600 hereby is added to Chapter 17.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 17.02.600 Commercial Parties Prohibited in all Residential 7ones and Property used for Residential Purposes. A. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council by the adoption of this section to prohibit parties conducted in a commercial manner within all residential zones and upon any property within the City actually utilized for residential purposes not withstanding the zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses) in order to preserve the rights of residents to the quiet enjoyment of their property. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 19, 1997 Page 2 a. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth herein: . "Admission charge" means a tangible benefit, monetary or otherwise, which is expressly or implicitly required as a condition of admittance to a party. Customary courtesies and clearly noncommercial activity such as gifts by guests and voluntary sharing of expenses for meals shall not be considered to be an "admission charge." "Admission charge" shall not include donations for political, community service, charitable, or religious purposes. . "Party" means three or more persons meeting together for social, recreational, or amusement purposes. C. Admission Charge Prohibited. No person or group of persons shall require, implicitly or expressly, any admission charge to any party conducted in any residential zone or upon any property within the City actually utilized for residential purposes notwithstanding the zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses). Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. · Section 5. Penalties for violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 19, 1997 Page 3 corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance. Section 6. Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontado, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.26 THERETO AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is receiving applications to construct wireless communication facilities in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Currently, the City lacks comprehensive regulations and standards applicable to such facilities. 2. Establishing regulations and standards applicable to construction and operation of wireless communication facilities will serve to reduce the potential for negative impacts on the community presented by such facilities. 3. Failure to implement wireless communications regulations will likely result in a substantial number of wireless communications facilities being installed without protective measures necessary to the public safety or welfare, and without standards necessary to the proper consideration of applications before the City. 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning this Ordinance and has recommended adoption thereof. 5. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public headng concerning the adoption of this Ordinance. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and ordain as follows: Section 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. Section ?: The provisions of this Ordinance set forth herein have been reviewed and considered by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder and, further, said Council finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that said provisions are therefore exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(b)(3) of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Section 3: Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended by the addition of a new Chapter 17.26 to read, in words and figures, as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 2 Chapter 17.26 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Sections: 17.26.010 17.26.020 17.26.030 17.26.040 17.26.050 17.26.060 17.26.070 17.26.080 17.26.090 17.26.100 Purpose. Definitions. Development criteria for all wireless communications facilities. Approval of minor wireless communications facilities. Approval of major wireless communications facilities. Height cdteria for major wireless communications facilities. Conditional use permit required. Variance. Revocation. Abandonment. 17.26.010 Purpose. The purpose of these regulations and guidelines is to regulate the establishment of wireless communication facilities and thereby protect the public health, safety, general welfare, and quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga, while preserving the rights of wireless communications providers. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found and determined that these regulations and guidelines for wireless communication facilities are necessary to attain these goals. These regulations are intended to supersede applicable provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code pertaining to communication facilities, and to establish flexible guidelines for the governance of wireless communication facilities which recognize the unique land use distribution, topography, and aesthetic characteristics of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. VVireless communications facilities are prohibited in the City of Rancho Cucamonga except as otherwise provided herein. 17.26.020 Definitions. Unless otherwise stated, the following definitions pertain to this Ordinance: "Antenna" means a device used in wireless communications which radiates and/or receives commercial cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio signals. "Antenna" shall not include any satellite dish antenna or any antenna utilized for amateur radio, citizens band radio, television, AM/FM, or shortwave radio reception purposes. "Building-Mounted" means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a building, or to the side of another structure such as a water tank, church steeple, freestanding sign, or similar structure, but not to include the roof of any structure. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04- CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 3 "Cellular" means an analog or digital wireless communication technology that is based on a system of interconnected neighboring cell sites. "Co-located" means the locating of wireless communications equipment from more than one provider on a single wireless communication facility. "Ground-Mounted" means mounted to a pole, monopole, tower, or other freestanding structure specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna. "Major Wireless Communication Facility" means a wireless communication facility that is ground- or roof-mounted or mounted in or on any public property including the public right-of-way. "Minor Wireless Communication Facility" means a wireless communication facility that is building-, facade-, or wall-mounted and does not exceed the height of the parapet wall or roof line of the building. A roof- mounted facility which is screened by a solid matedal on all four sides and does not exceed the maximum height of the distdct shall be considered a minor wireless communication facility. "Monopole" means a structure composed of a single spire, pole, or tower used to support antennas or related equipment. "Mounted" means attached or supported. "Personal Communication Service" means digital low-power, high- frequency commercial wireless radio communication technology that has the capacity for multiple communications services and the routing of calls to individuals, regardless of location. "Roof-Mounted" means mounted above the eave line of a building. "Stealth Facility". means any communication facility which is designed to blend into the surrounding environment, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, and shall include and mean any concealed antenna. "Wireless Communication Facility" means a facility consisting of any commercial antenna, monopole, microwave dish, and/or other related equipment necessary to the transmission and/or reception of cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio communications, and which has been granted a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, or a Wireless Registration Number by the California Public Utilities Commission, or otherwise provides wireless communications services to the public. CiTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 4 17.26.030 Development criteria for all wireless communication facilities. A. Screening and Site Selection Guidelines. 1. Stealth facilities and concealed antennas are preferred. 2. Wireless communications facilities shall be located where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. Where insufficient screening exists, applicants shall provide screening satisfactory to the City Planner, or as otherwise required herein. 3. Ground-mounted wireless communication facilities shall be located only in close proximity to existing above-ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility poles (which are not scheduled for removal or undergrounding for at least 18 months after the date of application), light poles, trees of comparable heights, and in areas where they will not detract from the appearance of the City. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference: a. Co-located with other major wireless communication facilities. b. On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, or utility facilities. C. On existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles. d. In industrial districts. e. In commercial districts. fo facilities only. In residential districts (minor wireless communications 5. Major wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 500 feet of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within 500 feet of any existing, legally established major wireless communication facility except when co-located on the same building, structure, or wireless facility. For the purposes of this section, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the nearest property line of any residential land use, or to the nearest point of another major wireless communication facility. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 5 B. Development Requirements. 1. As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall be required to provide written documentation demonstrating good faith efforts in locating facilities in accordance with the Site Selection Guidelines (order of preference). 2. Wireless communication facilities shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other required seals or legally required signage. 3. All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless communication facility shall be located within a building, enclosure, or underground vault that complies with the development standards of the distdct in which the accessory equipment is located, subject to City approval. If the equipment is permitted to be located above ground, it shall be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and include sufficient landscaping to screen the structure from view. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be subdued colors and non-reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and colors. 5. All screening for building-mounted facilities shall be compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and/or materials of the building. 6. Monopoles and antennas shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimensions than is necessary for the proper functioning of the wireless communications facility. The applicant shall provide documentation satisfactory to the City Planner establishing compliance with this subsection. 17.26.040 Al~proval of minor wireless communication facilities. Minor wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner pursuant to Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review procedures of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. In considering applications for minor wireless communication facilities, the City Planner shall be guided by both the provisions of Section 17.06.020 and this Ordinance. However, in the event of any inconsistency in said standards, the provisions of this Ordinance shall govern. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.020.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.050 Approval of major wireless communication facilities. Major wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In considering applications for major wireless communications facilities, the Planning Commission shall be guided by the -? CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 6 provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and this Ordinance. However, in the event of any inconsistencies in said standards, the provisions of this Ordinance shall govern. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed in wdting within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.060 Height criteda for major wireless communications facilities. No wireless communications facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable distdct unless the facility is utilized by two or more wireless communication providers pursuant to a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may consider approval of facilities proposed to exceed the maximum height limit subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit application pursuant to Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.070 Conditional use permit required. Each major wireless communication facility for which an application is made dudng the term of this Ordinance must first receive final approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As a condition of issuance of a conditional use permit for a facility utilizing the public right-of-way, an applicant may be required to enter into a franchise agreement with the City. 17.26.080 Variance. Any person may apply for a variance as to the requirements set forth herein pursuant to Section 17.04.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.090 Revocation. Any approval granted pursuant to this Ordinance may, after notice and headng, be terminated for violation of any provisions of this Ordinance or any other applicable laws, or for fraud or misrepresentation in the application process. 17.26.100 Abandonment. A. A wireless communication facility is considered abandoned and shall be promptly removed as provided herein if it ceases to provide wireless communication services for 180 or more days. Such removal shall be in accordance with proper health and safety requirements and all ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City. B. A written notice of the determination of abandonment shall be sent by first class mail, or personally delivered, to the operator of the wireless communication facility at said operator's business address on file with the City. The operator shall remove all facilities within 30 days of the date of such notice unless, within 10 business day of the date of said notice, the operator appeals such determination, in writing, to the Planning Commission. The City Planner shall schedule a hearing on the matter to be CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 7 conducted before the Planning Commission at which time the operator may present any relevant evidence on the issue of abandonment. The Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify with or without conditions the original determination of abandonment and shall make written findings in support of its decision. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final. C. Any wireless communications facility determined to be abandoned and not removed within the 30 day period from the date of notice, or where an appeal has been timely filed, within such time as prescribed by the Planning Commission following its final determination of abandonment, shall be in violation of this Ordinance, and the operator of such facility shall be subject to the penalties prescribed herein. Facilities determined to be abandoned and not removed within the time limits prescribed herein hereby are deemed to be a nuisance and, alternative to the procedure described above, may be abated as a nuisance in any manner provided by law. Section 4: Except as provided herein, the provisions of this Ordinance shall preempt and supersede any and all inconsistent provisions contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 5: A. All wireless communications facilities for which applications have been approved by the City and/or building permits have been issued on or prior to the adoption of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines contained herein, unless subsection B applies. B. All wireless communication facilities for which building permits have expired, and have not been renewed on or prior to the adoption date of this Ordinance, shall be required to comply with the regulations and guidelines contained herein. C. All wireless communication facilities for which submitted applications were determined complete by the Planning Department on or prior to the adoption date of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines contained herein. D. All wireless communication facilities for which applications were received by the Planning Department following the effective date of this Ordinance shall be required to comply with the regulations and guidelines contained herein. Section 6: Penalties for violation. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 8 be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof dudng which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this Ordinance. Section 7: Civil remedies available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 8: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 9: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 12.16 TO TITLE 12 THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF NEWSPAPER RACKS WITHIN THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Chapter 12.16 to Title 12 thereof to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Chapter 12.16 REGULATION OF NEWSPAPER RACKS Sections: 12.16.010 12.16.020 12.16.030 12.16.040 12.16. O50 12.16.060 12.16.070 12.16.080 12.16.090 12.16.100 12.16.110 12.16.120 12.16.130 12.16.140 12.16.150 12.16.160 Intent and purpose. Definitions. Permit required. Prohibited installations. Placement and maintenance standards. Maintenance standards Display of certain matter prohibited. Display of harmful matter. Violation - notice to owner. Impounding of newsracks o when authorized. Impounding of newsracks - request for hearing. Return of impounded newsracks - conditions. Sale or disposal after impoundment. Impoundment - hearing procedures. Appeals. Restoration following newsrack removal. 12.16.010 Intent and purpose. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that newsracks, stands, containers, and similar newspaper and vending devices have proliferated and increased in areas of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the extent that, in some instances, they constitute a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare by impeding pedestrian traffic and interfering with ingress and egress to and from buildings, vehicles, and public modes of transportation. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare through the regulation of placement, appearance, number, and size and servicing of newsracks on public rights-of-way so as to: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA March 19, 1997 Page 2 A. Provide for pedestrian and driving safety and convenience; B. Insure no unreasonable interference with the flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic including ingress into, or egress from, any residence or place of business, or from the street to the sidewalk, by persons exiting or entering parked or standing vehicles; C. Provide reasonable access for the use and maintenance of sidewalks, poles, posts, traffic signs or signals, hydrants, mailboxes, and access to locations used for public transportation services; D. Reduce visual blight on the public rights-of-way and protect the aesthetics of store window displays, public landscaping, and other improvements; E. Maintain and protect the value of surrounding properties; F. Reduce exposure to the City to personal injury or property damage claims and litigation; G. Protect the right to distribute information as protected by the state and federal constitutions through the use of newsracks; H. Avoid interference with the emergency activities of public safety agencies. It is not the intent of this Chapter to in any way discriminate against, regulate, or interfere with the publication, circulation, distribution, or dissemination of any newspapers or other written materials. 12.16.020 Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall be construed to have the meanings herein set forth, unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended: A. "Director" means the Director of Community Development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or his or her designee, B. "Explicit sexual acts" means depictions of sexual intercourse, oral copulation, anal intercourse, oral-anal copulation, bestiality, sadism, masochism, or excretory functions in conjunction with sexual activity, masturbation, or lewd exhibition of genitals, whether any of the above conduct is depicted or described as being performed alone or between members of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals, or other acts of sexual arousal involving any physical contact with a person's genitals, pubic region, pubic hair, perineum, anus, or anal region. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 3 C. "Newsrack" means any self-service or coin-operated box, container, storage unit, or other dispenser installed, used, or maintained for the display, sale, or distribution of any publication. D. "Owner" means any person or company whose name appears as an owner on a newsrack as required by Section 12.16.050.H of this Chapter, for which a permit is sought or obtained. E. "Parkway" means that area between the sidewalks and the curb of any street, and where there is no sidewalk, that area between the edge of the roadway and the property line adjacent thereto. Parkways shall also include any area within a roadway which is not open to vehicular travel. F. "Public right-of-way" means any place of any' nature which is dedicated to use by the public for pedestrian and vehicular travel, and includes, but is not limited to, a street, sidewalk, curb, gutter, public easement, crossing, intersection, parkway, highway, alley, lane, mall, court, way, avenue, boulevard, road, roadway, viaduct, bridge, thoroughfare, park, square, and any other similar public way. G. "Roadway" means that portion of a street improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel. H. "Sidewalk" means any surface provided for the use of pedestrians. I. "Street" means all that area dedicated to public use for public street purposes and shall include, but not be limited to, roadways, parkways, alleys, and sidewalks. 12.16.030 Permit reauired. A. A newsrack permit issued in accordance with this Chapter shall be required prior to the installation, placement, or maintenance of any newsrack which, in whole or in part, rests upon, in, or over any public right- of-way. Each permit shall be valid for one year unless sooner terminated as provided herein, and may be renewed annually. Each permit shall designate the number and location or locations of newsracks for which the permit has been issued. B. Application. A written application for a newsrack permit shall be filed with the Director and shall contain the following: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant and owner of the newsrack(s); 2. The name, address, and telephone number of a representative or other responsible person whom the City may notify or contact at any time concerning the applicant's newsrack(s); CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 4 3. The number of newsracks at the street address of each proposed location as shown on a scaled drawing; 4. A diagram of the location or locations proposed for the installation of the newsrack(s); 5. Name(s) of newspaper(s) or other written material to be contained in each newsrack; 6. Type or brand of newsrack, including a photograph or scaled drawing of the newsrack and mount; and 7. A written statement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, whereby the owner agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, and employees, from any loss or liability or damage, including expenses and costs, for bodily or personal injury, and for property damage sustained by any person, as a result of the installation, use, or maintenance of a newsrack or newsracks within the City. C. Each application shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee in an amount set by resolution of the City Council, which shall not exceed the actual cost of investigating the facts contained in the application and processing of the application. D. Issuance and Denial. Upon a finding that the applicant is in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter, the Director shall issue a newsrack permit applicable to the location or locations approved by the Traffic Engineer. If a permit is denied, the applicant shall be notified in writing of the specific cause of such denial by the Director and of the right to appeal in accordance with Section 12.16.140 of this Chapter. E. A newsrack permit shall not be required prior to the installation, placement, or maintenance of a newsrack which does not rest, in whole or in part, in or upon a public right-of-way. Such newsrack may not, however, be placed within any required setback area, or where otherwise prohibited by the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For purposes of application of the Development Code to newsracks, a newsrack shall be deemed to be a 'structure.' 12.16.040 Prohibited installations. A. No person shall install, use, or maintain, or cause to be installed, used, or maintained, any newsrack which projects onto, into, or over any part of the roadway of any public street, or which rests, wholly or in part, upon, along, or over any portion of the roadway of any public street. B. No person shall install, use, or maintain, or cause to be installed, used, or maintained, any newsrack which, in whole or in part, rests upon, in, CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 5 or over any public sidewalk or parkway, when such installation, use, or maintenance: 1. Would likely endanger the safety of persons or property; or 2. Is on a site or location used for public utility purposes, public transportation purposes, or other governmental purpose; 3. Would likely and unreasonably interfere with or impede the flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic, including access to any legally parked or stopped vehicle; or 4. Would likely and unreasonably interfere with or impede ingress into or egress from any residence or place of business, or the use of poles, posts, traffic signs or signals, hydrants, mailboxes, or other objects permitted at or near the location; or 5. Would interfere with the cleaning of any sidewalk by the use of mechanical sidewalk cleaning machinery. 12.16.050 Placement standards. Any newsrack which, in whole or in part, rests upon, in, or over any public sidewalk or parkway shall comply with the following standards: A. Each newsrack shall be installed in an upright and secure position. B. Each newsrack shall be of a type that is completely enclosed with a self-closing door that is either self-latching or otherwise requires manual or mechanical release at each use. C. No newsrack shall exceed 40 inches in height, 30 inches in width, or 24 inches in thickness. D. Newsracks shall only be placed near a curb or adjacent to the wall of a building. Newsracks placed near the curb shall be placed no less than 18 inches nor more than 24 inches from the edge of the curb and shall not open toward the roadway. Newsracks placed adjacent to the wall of a building shall be placed parallel to the wall and not less than 6 inches nor more than 18 inches from the wall. No newsrack shall be placed or maintained on a sidewalk or parkway opposite a newsstand or another newsrack. E. No newsrack shall be chained, bolted, or otherwise attached to: 1. Any property without the express wdtten permission of the owner of such property; provided however, that the Director may require newsracks to be secured to the sidewalk by means of an approved device; or CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 6 2. Any fixture located in the public right-of-way, except to other newsracks, including but not limited to, any tree, streetlight post, traffic signal, or sign. F. Attachment to Other Newsracks. Newsracks, when placed side- by-side, may be chained or otherwise attached to one another, provided that no group of newsracks shall extend for a distance of more than 10 feet along a curb, and a space of not less than 6 feet shall separate each group of newsracks. G. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 12.16.040, no newsrack shall be placed, installed, used, or maintained: 1. Within 10 feet of any marked 'mid-block' crosswalk; 2. Within 30 feet of any street or alley curb return; 3. Within 8 feet of any fire hydrant, fire call box, curb bordering any fire access lane, police call box, or other emergency facility; 4. Within 10 feet of any driveway; 5. Within 5 feet ahead of or 25 feet to the rear of any sign marking a designated bus stop; 6. Within 6 feet of any bus bench or bus shelter; 7. At any location whereby the clear space for the passageway of pedestrians is reduced to less than 4 feet; or 8. Within 3 feet of any area improved with lawn, flowers, shrubs, or trees or within 3 feet of any display window of any building abutting the sidewalk or parkway or in such manner as to impede or interfere with the reasonable use of such window for display purposes. H. Color. Newsracks shall be of unobtrusive neutral colors of grey, brown, or black in order to blend in with the streetscape. I. Materials. Newsracks shall be constructed of metal, except for the display window. J. No newsrack shall be used for advertising signs or publicity purposes other than that dealing with the display, sale, or purchase of the newspaper or printed material sold therefrom. K. Each newsrack shall be constructed and located in compliance with this Chapter and in such manner as to comply with all state and federal regulations concerning access by disabled persons. -/7 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 7 L. Each newsrack shall have affixed thereto, in a place where such information may be easily seen, the correct name, address, and telephone number of the owner thereof. Upon acceptance of a newsrack permit, each permittee shall be deemed to have consented to receive any notices given pursuant to this Chapter, by mail, at the address affixed to such permitted newsrack(s). M. No newsrack permit shall be transferred except upon ten calendar days prior notification to City and continued compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. 12.16.060 Maintenance standards. Each newsrack shall be maintained in a clean and neat con,dition and in good repair at all times in accordance with the following provisions: A. Each newsrack shall prominently display the correct name, address, and telephone number of the owner thereof. B. Each newsrack shall be maintained in a condition that is free of accumulations of outdated printed materials, trash, rubbish, or debds. C. Each newsrack shall be regularly serviced so that: 1. It is kept reasonably free of chipped, faded, peeling, and cracked paint in the visible, painted areas thereof; 2. It is kept reasonably free of rust and corrosion in the visible, unpainted metal areas thereof; 3. The clear glass or plastic parts thereof, if any, through which the printed material being dispensed, are not broken and are kept reasonably free of tears, peeling, fading, dirt, or grime. 4. The structural parts of the newsrack are not broken or unduly misshapen. 12.16.070 Display of certain matter prohibited. Publications offered either for sale or at no charge from newsracks placed or maintained on or projecting into or over a public right-of-way shall not be displayed or exhibited in a manner which exposes to public view from any public right-of- way any of the following: A. Any statements or words describing explicit sexual acts, sexual organs, or excrement where such statements or words have as their purpose or effect sexual arousal, gratification, or affront; B. Any picture or illustration of genitals, pubic hair, pednea, anuses, or anal regions of any person where such picture or illustration has as its purpose or effect sexual arousal, gratification, or affront; CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 8 C. Any picture or illustration depicting explicit sexual acts where such picture or illustration has as its purpose or effect sexual arousal, gratification, or affront. 12.16.080 Display of harmful matter. A. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the terms harmful matter, matter, person, knowingly, exhibit, and minor shall have the meanings specified in Section 313 of the Penal Code of the State of California, or any successor provisions thereto. For the purposes of this section, the term blinder rack shall mean opaque material placed in front of, or inside, the newsrack and which prevents exposure to public view. B. Prohibition. No person shall knowingly exhibit, display, or cause to be exhibited or displayed, harmful matter in any newsrack located, in whole or in part, in or on a public right-of-way or other public place from which minors are not excluded, unless blinder racks have been installed so that the lower two-thirds of the matter is not exposed to public view. 12.16.090 Violation - notice to owner. Whenever any newsrack is found to be in violation of this Chapter, the Director shall cause a tag to be attached to such newsrack specifying the date and nature of the violation. Within three calendar days thereafter, a wdtten notice of such violation shall be sent by first-class mail by the Director to the owner whose name appears on the newsrack as required in Section 12.16.050. H, specifying the nature of the violation and that the newsrack shall be impounded if corrections are not made. The owner shall, within ten calendar days from the date on which the notice of violation was mailed, either cause the violation to be corrected or request a hearing pursuant to Section 12.16.130. 12.16.100 Impounding of newsracks - when authorized. A. If an owner fails to timely correct the violation(s) specified in the written notice, and fails to request a headng within the time provided herein, the Director may impound such newsrack or newsracks; B. In the event a newsrack does not have the owner's name, address, and telephone number affixed thereto as required by this Chapter, then such newsrack may be impounded if, within ten calendar days of the date the violation tag was affixed, the owner has not requested a headng as provided in Section 12.16.140, in which case the newsrack shall be deemed to be abandoned; C. Where the installation, use, or maintenance of a newsrack creates an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, it may be impounded, provided written notice is thereafter provided to the owner by first-class mail pursuant to Section 12.16.110 of this Chapter. D. When such newsrack has been abandoned, it may be impounded. For purposes of this section, a newsrack shall be deemed abandoned when it has remained empty for 30 consecutive days or longer CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 9 or no new publication has been placed in the newsrack for 45 days or longer. Upon abandonment, a newsrack may be impounded without prior notice, provided post-impoundment notice is given to the owner, if the owner can be identified, pursuant to Section 12.16.110. 12.16.110 Impounding of newsracks - notice to owner. VVhenever any newsrack is impounded, the Director shall provide wdtten notice by first- class mail to the owner within three calendar days of such impoundment and of the rights of the owner to recover such impounded newsrack(s). 12.16.120 Return of impounded newsracks - conditions. A. Any newsrack, together with it contents, which has been impounded shall be returned to the owner: 1. If a hearing is not timely requested, upon receipt of an impound fee within 30 days of impoundment, the amount of which has been set by resolution of the City Council; or 2. Upon a determination, after headng by the Director, that the newsrack should not have been impounded and should be returned to the owner; or 3. Upon a decision by the' City Council on appeal that the newsrack should not have been impounded. B. In the event a hearing has not been requested within the time permitted, an impound fee, the amount of which has been set by resolution of the City Council, shall be imposed upon the owner. 12.16.130 Sale or disposal after impoundment. The Director may sell or otherwise dispose of any newsrack, together with its contents, and retain the proceeds, on behalf of the City, from any such or other disposition and any moneys contained in the newsrack at the time of its impoundment, provided that either: · . A. Thirty days have elapsed since impoundment occurred, no hearing has been requested within the time permitted, and the owner has failed to pay all impound fees assessed; or B. A hearing and an appeal, if filed, have resulted in a final determination that the newsrack was properly impounded and fees assessed have not been received within 30 days from the date of said final determination. 12.16.140 Impoundment - hearing procedures. A. Any newsrack owner may file a wdtten request with the Director for a headng within the time specified in Section 12.16.090, for the purpose CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 10 of demonstrating that a newsrack should not be impounded, was improperly impounded, or that a violation as specified in the notice of violation has not in fact occurred. B. Notice of Hearing. Within five calendar days from the date on which the request for hearing is received, the Director shall set a hearing date and shall notify the owner by first-class mail of the date, time, and place of such headrig. The hearing shall occur within ten calendar days of the date of mailing the notice. C. Conduct of Hearing. At the time set for the hearing or at the date to which the hearing is continued, the Director shall receive all evidence relevant to the occurrence or non-occurrence of the specified violation(s), the compliance or non-compliance with any or the provisions of this Chapter, and any other relevant information. The hearing need not be .conducted according to technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses. D. Decision after Hearing. Within ten calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Director shall find and determine, from the facts adduced at the hearing, whether the newsrack is in violation of this Chapter. The decision of the Director shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact, a determination of the issues presented and the amount of the impound fee, if any, to be imposed. Thereafter, the Director may order the owner to remove such newsrack, if determined to be in violation of this Chapter, within ten calendar days of the mailing date of the decision. If a notice of appeal is not timely filed during said ten-day period, the Director may thereafter order the newsrack to be impounded without further notice to the owner. E. Notice of Decision. The Director shall send to the owner, by first- class mail, a copy of the decision and order. 12.16.150 Appeals. A. Any newsrack owner may, within ten calendar days of the mailing date of the copy of the Director's decision and order, appeal such decision to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal. If no hearing was timely requested and a newsrack was impounded, then the owner may appeal such impoundment provided a written request for appeal is received by the Director within ten calendar days of such impoundment. B. An appeal shall set forth in writing specifically wherein the appellant believes there was error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Director. The Director shall, within ten calendar days, transmit the appeal, together with a copy of his or her file, decision and order, to the clerk of the City Council, who shall set the matter for hearing. C. The City Council shall, upon receipt of the material specified in the preceding paragraph from the Director, and after a hearing: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 11 1. Approve the decision and order of the Director; 2. Reverse or modify the decision and order, and refer the matter back to the Director; or 3. Where no hearing before the Director was timely requested, sustain the impoundment or impose fees or order the newsrack returned with or without fees being imposed. 12.16.160 Restoration following newsrack removal. In the event an owner removes any newsrack, or has a newsrack removed by the Director following hearing and/or appeal, if any, it shall be such owner's responsibility to restore the site of the newsrack to an undamaged condition. Undamaged condition shall mean a condition which is smooth, free of holes, fasteners, and physical devices of any nature, such that another newsrack may be located on that specific site without further restoration. In the event such newsrack permittee fails to restore the site as required herein, the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be authorized, at its discretion, to restore the site following the expiration of five calendar days prior written notice to the owner stating his or her obligation to perform restoration. The cost of such restoration performed by the City shall be recoverable from the permittee as a debt in a contract action." SECTION 2: Time for compliance. Every owner of a newsrack for which a permit would be required pursuant to this Chapter shall, within 120 days of the effective date of this Ordinance, apply for and obtain a permit for such newsrack or newsracks. Following the expiration of said period, the Director shall be authorized to proceed to enforce the provisions of this Chapter. SECTION 3: Penalties for Violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted or failing to comply with any of their requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof dudng which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 4: Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NEWSRACKS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 1997 Page 12 order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. SECTION 5: Severability. The City Council hereby declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted by rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance or the Chapter hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE; PART III, SECTION IV.A.5 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND SECTION 5.4 (PAGE 5-30) OF THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION ANTENNAS, INCLUDING SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS. A. Recitals. 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 1997, as required by law, and has recommended the adoption of this Ordinance as set forth below. 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on April 17, 1997, as required by law, with respect to the adoption of this Ordinance. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determined that the adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Division 8 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The modifications to Title 17 and various specific and community plans, as set forth herein, are in conformance with the City's General Plan. SECTION 4: Section IV.A.5 of Part III of the Industrial Area Specific Plan is hereby amended by deletion of the words "satellite dish antennas," wherever the same shall appear. SECTION 5: Section 5.4 (Page 5-30) of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan is hereby amended by deletion of the words "satellite dish antennas," wherever the same shall appear. SECTION 6: Section 17.06.020.C.5 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: , The construction and/or placement of silos, antennas not regulated by Chapter 17.28, water tanks, roof or ground- mounted equipment visible from public view, or similar structures and equipment as determined by the City Planner; CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 2 SECTION 7: Section 17.08.060.1.4. of Chapter 17.08 of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby repealed. SECTION 8: A new Chapter 17.28 is hereby added to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chapter 17.28 REGULATION OF TELEVISION. SATELLITE DISH. AND RADIO ANTENNAS IN ALL ZONES Sections: 17.28.010 17.28.020 17.28.030 17.28.040 17.28.050 17.28.060 17.28.070 17.28.080 Purpose. Definitions. Antennas less than 20 square feet in surface area. Antennas 20 square feet or greater in surface area. Screening required. Conditions and restrictions applicable to all antenna installations. Antenna permit application. Antenna placement in non-residential zones. Section 17.28.010 - Purpose. Consistent with applicable federal regulations, including the limited preemption created by the Federal Communications Commission as to local regulation of satellite dish antennas, this Chapter is designed to provide local regulation of television, satellite dish, and radio antennas in order to promote and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the City by minimizing significant visual impacts resulting from, and reducing safety hazards associated with, the size, height, and placement of such antennas. The standards set forth herein are designed to balance the City's concern for public safety and aesthetic interests, with each person's dght to transmit or receive radio and/or television signals without imposing unreasonable limitations on antennas, or preventing the transmission or reception of radio and/or television signals, or imposing unreasonable costs on applicants seeking to install such antennas. Section 17.28.020 - Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, and except where otherwise indicated, the following terms shall be defined as set forth in this subsection: A. "Antenna" shall mean any antenna, together with any associated support structure or related equipment, used for purposes of transmitting or receiving radio, television, and/or satellite broadcast signals, and not otherwise subject to the sole CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 3 regulatory authority of any federal agency or authority. "Antenna" shall not include any antenna used solely for amateur radio or citizen's band radio purposes or equipment for cellular communications, personal communication devices, or similar wireless communication equipment. B. "Antenna Permit" shall mean an approval of a minor development review application as provided for in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.06.020. For purposes of utilizing the minor development review process, the provisions of this Chapter shall prevail where inconsistent with any provision of said Section 17.06.020. C. "City Planner" shall mean the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or a designee thereof. D. "Planning Department" or "Department" shall mean the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. E, "Surface Area" shall mean the sum of that area existing between the outer dimensions of such antenna, as measured in three dimensions. Surface area shall not include surface area of any antenna support structure. Section 17.28.030 - Antennas less than 20 square feet in surface area. A. Any antenna less than 20 square feet in area may be mounted in the rear or side yard, or on the roof of any structure if the rear or side yard prove unsatisfactory, subject to all conditions hereinafter provided. B, Any antenna less than 20 square feet in area may be mounted in the front yard of any residence, subject to conditions hereinafter provided, upon receipt of an antenna permit obtained in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.28.070. Section 17.28.040 - Antennas 20 square feet or greater in surface area. A. Each antenna, 20 square feet or greater in area, shall be installed in the rear yard, except as hereinafter provided. B. In the event overall quality of reception in the rear yard is not at least equal to that received by cable, or other circumstances preclude such installation, a permit may be obtained, in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.28.070, authorizing the antenna to be located in a side yard, on the roof of a structure, or in the front yard, subject to conditions hereinafter imposed. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 4 Section 17.28.050 - Screening required. Ao Each antenna visible to the public which has a surface area exceeding 20 square feet or greater, or which is permitted by this Chapter to be mounted in the front yard, shall be screened to the satisfaction of the City Planner, unless otherwise screened from public view by existing structures, landscaping, or topographical features. If such antenna is to be mounted directly, or through a supporting structure, to the ground, then such screening shall be accomplished through the use of appropriate plants, trees, or shrubbery or a combination of such plants, trees, shrubbery, and wood lattice or other material compatible with the residence or other adjacent structures. Plants, trees, or shrubs to be utilized for screening purposes shall have a minimum container volume of 10 gallons at the time of planting. All such screening shall be sufficiently high so as to screen at least 90 percent or more of the antenna from public view. ao Each antenna with a surface area 20 square feet or greater, which is permitted by this Chapter to be roof mounted, shall be screened with materials compatible with the structure upon which such antenna is mounted and shall be screened to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Such screening shall be sufficiently high so as to screen at least 90 percent of the antenna from public view. Go This Section 17.28.050 shall not apply to satellite dish antennas, 2 meters or less in diameter in commercial or industrial zones, or 1 meter or less in diameter in any other zone. Section 17.28.060 -Conditions and restrictions applicable to all antenna installations. A, The preferred order of placement of any antenna is rear yard first, then side yard, roof, and finally front yard. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the preferred location shall be that location which results in the greatest screening of the antenna from public view by existing landscaping, structural, and/or topographical features. Bo No antenna shall exceed 10 feet in height above the peak roof line of the structure upon which such antenna is mounted or the height of the peak roof line of the closest building or residential structure if such antenna is not to be roof mounted. C. No antenna shall be installed in any required setback, within 5 feet of any property line, or in any other location which would impede emergency access to any portion of the subject property. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 5 D. e. F, O. Section A. No satellite dish antenna shall exceed 10 feet, 6 inches in diameter. Each satellite dish antenna exceeding 5 feet in diameter shall be earth-tone or neutral in color and shall be constructed of a "see- through" mesh or open grid design. Solid surface receive-only satellite dish antennas, such as solid, white fiberglass designs, are prohibited. Nothing herein shall excuse any person from obtaining all permits otherwise required or from complying with any and all applicable local and state codes, laws, and regulations pertaining to the installation of antennas and/or antenna support structures. No more than two, receive-only antennas 20 square feet or greater in surface area, may be installed per residential lot or parcel. 7.28.070 - Antenna permit application. Where a permit is required, or application therefore is authorized, under any provision of this Chapter, each person desiring a permit shall apply to the Planning Department and shall submit a non-refundable processing fee in such amount as set by resolution of the City Council and a completed application on a form provided by the Department containing at minimum, the following: 1. Name, address, and telephone number of the applicant; . The specific location where the applicant proposes to install the antenna, including a detailed description of the antenna design and any supporting structure proposed to be utilized, including size, weight,-and such other information as the Department may require; o A, statement as to why the proposed antenna may not be satisfactorily installed, or will not satisfactorily function, in a preferred area, as prescribed herein; , A description of the screening proposed to be utilized by the applicant, or facts establishing that screening is not required; o A sketch or other drawing, satisfactory to the City Planner, showing: (a) Location of physical features on the subject property; CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 6 B. go D. e. (b) Approximate dimensions (plus or minus 1 foot) of the subject lot and physical features thereon; (c) The specific location where the antenna, and screening if required, are proposed to be installed; (d) Any other physical features in the area of the subject property which applicant feels would adversely affect reception on those areas set forth herein as "preferred;" and (e) The design of the antenna and proposed support structure. o If applying for a permit pursuant to subsection C, below, a statement setting forth what the applicant contends are exceptional circumstances justifying a waiver of any of the requirements of this Chapter. All applicants for an antenna permit may be required to show, to the satisfaction of the City Planner, that circumstances preclude installation in a preferred area, or that reception quality in the preferred area or areas is insufficient, as herein prescribed. Any person aggrieved by any provision of this Chapter because of exceptional circumstances may apply for an antenna permit in accordance with the provisions of this Section. The City Planner shall provide the applicant with a written decision approving, denying, or conditionally approving an antenna permit application within 21 calendar days following submission of a completed application pursuant to this Chapter. The City Planner's decision shall contain findings in support of the decision. The City Planner's written decision shall be final and shall become effective with 10 days following the date of said decision unless, during such 10-day period, an aggrieved applicant files a written appeal with the City Planner. Upon receipt of a written appeal, the City Planner shall cause the matter to be placed on the Planning Commission's agenda for public hearing and consideration by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall decide the appeal, with written findings, within 60 days of submission. The Planning Commission may sustain, reverse, or modify the City Planner's decision and its decision shall be final unless appealed. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, no antenna permit shall be required as to any satellite dish 2 meters or less in diameter in any commercial or industrial zone or 1 meter or less in diameter in any other zone; however, such satellite dish CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 7 antennas 2 meters or less in diameter in commercial or industrial zones shall be subject to the provisions of Section 17.28.060, subsections A, B, C, D, F, and G. Section 17.28.080 - Antenna placement in non-residential zones. Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, all provisions herein, including, but not limited to, permit and screening requirements, shall be fully applicable to placement of antennas in non-residential zones. The preferred order of placement shall be rear setback areas first, then side setback areas, roof, and finally front setback areas. SECTION 9: plan provisions. Preemption of inconsistent Municipal Code, specific plan, and community The provisions of this Ordinance shall preempt and supersede any and all provisions contained in Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and in any specific plan or community plan in effect, as amended from time to time, which are inconsistent herewith, provided, however, that the enactment of this Ordinance shall not be deemed to excuse any violation of any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, including Title 17, or of any provision of any specific plan or community plan, occurring prior to the effective date hereof. SECTION 10: Penalties for violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 11: Civil remedies available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. SECTION 12: Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-01, ISPA 96-04, & SUBAREA 18 AMEND. 96-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 17, 1997 Page 8 SECTION 13: The City Clerk shall certifyto the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 97-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 4.34 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-041-27, 41, AND 47. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 97-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 11, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On Apdl 17, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public hearing on April 17, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 4.34 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and presently contains both developed and vacant land. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The property has been in use as offices since before the City's incorporation; and c. The City's 1981 General Plan designated the property as General Commercial and said land use designation has not changed; and d. The property to the north of the subject site is designated General Commercial and is developed with a commercial center. The property to the west is designated General Industrial and is developed as an industrial complex. The property to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed as the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and single family homes. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed as Cucamonga Elementary School; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 97-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 17, 1997 PAGE 2 e. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and This amendment does promote the goals-and objectives of the Land Use Element; g. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment No. 97-01. 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. ~7 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR SUBTENANT SIGNS WITHIN THE SERVICE STATION CLASSIFICATION. A. Recitals. 1. On the 11th day of March 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public headng, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-17, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 97-01. 2. On the 17th day of April 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 14.20.100 Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones is hereby amended as shown in the Exhibit "A." SECTION 2: The Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 0 N 0 0 L_ 0 0 I 0 N 0 0 , 0 ~ 0 L_ o 0 c:D .,.., · 0 ~ OE 0 .,g '~ ::3 0 CITY OF R_ANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE' TO' FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 7, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Cindy Norris, AICP, Associate Planner/CDBG Coordinator CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL DRAFT CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98. - The review of the Federally required Annual Action Plan ~br fiscal year 1997-98, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on an estimated new fund allocation of $984,000 and prior year reprogrammed funds of $47,090. RECOMMENDATION The City Council conduct a second public hearing and take public testimony regarding the application for funding; and adopt the attached Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan, therein authorizing the Mayor to submit the Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan to HUD for consideration. BACKGROUND Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG) are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cities and counties based on a formula which considers the comrnumty's population, extent of poverty, and age of housing stock. To be eligible for CDBG funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: o The development of viable urban communities including decent housing and a suitable living environment; and The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. In addition, CDBG regulations provide that at least 70 percent of all funds must be directed to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the fiscal year 1997-98, 100 percent benefit low- and moderate-income persons. This year's estimated grant amount of $984,000 represents a $14,000 or 1.4 percent reduction from last year's grant amount. Last year's grant was reduced by 2.5 percent or $26,000 from the previous year. i /-/5 CITT CQL%'CIL STAFF REPORT AN%'UAL ACTION PLAN May 7, 1997 Page ') On March 19, 1997, the City Council conducted a'public hearing to take testimony concerning the communities housing and non-housing community development needs. At that meeting the Council recommended approval of the Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan with modifications to add two additional public service providers; OPARC and the Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy, granting them each $3,000. To accommodate this change, $6,000 was moved from the Calle Vejar and Avenida Leon Street design project. Additionally, since the last meeting, during the course of the City's normal budget process, additional funds were required to cover personnel costs in the CDBG budget. Those funds were also moved from the Calle Vejar and Avertida Leon Design project thereby eliminating it from the 1997- 98 proposed budget. This project will receive funding in the following 1998-99 program year and the delay will not have a significant effect on the overall street improvement component of the CDBG program. Exhibit "A" to this report provides the final list of proposed projects and funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Additionally, Exhibit "B" provides a detailed assessment of the proposed fund reprogramming and carryover amounts. Finally, Exhibit "C" is a copy of the Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan, including the required annual application and certifications. CORRESPONDENCE Notice of availability of the Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published on March 27, 1997 in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and La Voz newspapers as eighth page display ads. Copies of the Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan ,,,,'ere mailed to local City and County, government agencies and the San Bernardino Housing Authoriw. Additionally, copies of the document were made available at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Senior Center, Lions Part Community Center and at the LibraD'. t~raa puller City Planner BB:CN/mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A"- List of Proposals and Funding Recommendations (Table) Exhibit "B"- List of Prior Year Reprogramming and Carry Over Actions Exhibit "C" - Final Draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan -.... m m /-/7 CDBG FUND REPROGRAMMING AND CARRYOVER SUMMARY TABLES NOTE' There are two types of funds reviewed: REPROGRAMMED FUNDS' Funds left in project accounts that were shown as completed in the 1995-96 GPR. These funds must be reprogrammed to other projects. (Indicated at the top of the first table). CARRY-OVER FUNDS: Funds that are left in projects that were not shown as completed on the 1995-96 GPR. Funds left in these accounts are considered carryover - ie for HUD's purposes these funds are sill remaining in the projects where they were originally allocated. (Indicated in the second half of the first table). EXHIBIT "B" ,./q REPROG RAMNIE D FUNDS. FROM.PRIOR YEARS Fiscal ~'ear 90-91 91-92 92-93 93 -94 93-94 94-95 95-96 94-95 95-96 FROM TO (FY 97-98) .-Iccount Description Une. rpended Fiscal ,-Iccount Description Number Funds Year Number 9042 Vinmar $335.00 97-98 9500 Tapia Via 9043 Sierra Madre $11.00 9500 Tapia Via 9044 Calavcras $19.00 9500 Taloia Via 9116 Chaffey Garcia 5595.00 8189 HIP 9121 Vin/Sm Water $7,274.00 9500 Tapia Via 9123 Lcdig House $1,949.00 8 189 HIP 9134 Sierra Mad Con $225.00 9500 Tapia Via 9329 Vinmar $11.986.00 9500 Tapia Via 9213 HOPE S832.00 92 ! 3 HOPE 9331 Calaveras $2,722.00 9500 Tapia Via 8185 Admin $3,758.00 8185 Admin 9115 Calav/Ar-9th $536.00 9500 Tapia Via 9105 Senior Cntr $7,884.00 RCSC Parking 8187 Fair Housing $160.00 8187 Fair Housing 9213 HOPE $2.680.00 9213 HOPE Addtl grant $1.000.00 8185 Admin 8185 Administration $5.123.00 8185 Admin Reprogrammed Funds 5335.00 $ I 1.00 519.00 5595.00 57.274.00 $1.949.00 5225.00 $ I 1.986.00 $832.00 $2,722.00 $3,758.00 $536.00 $7,884.00 $160.00 52,680.00 $1.000.00 5;5.123.00 $47,089.00 FUNDS CARRIED- FORIVARD FROM PRIOR: YEAR ALLOC2.~.TIONS ~ DONOT HAVE TO: BE, REPROGR.$M~IE-D 9106 Wheelchair $1.533.00 9106 Wheelchair 8189 Home Impr $2,144.00 8189 HIP 9315 Lions W 570,230.00 9315 Lions W 9106 Wheelchair $322X)0 9106 Wheelchair 9107 Sidewalk Gr 53,280.00 9107 Sidewalk G 9315 Lions W $228,520.00 9315 Lions W 8189 Home Imp 520.854.00 8189 HIP 9045 Graffiti Remov $2,200.00 9045 Graffiti Removal 9500 Tapia Via $15,700.00 9500 Tapia Via 8187 Fair Housing $1.966.00 8187 Fair Housing 9213 HOPE 52,685 00 9213 HOPE 9503 Boys & Girls $6,000.00 9503 YMCA 9215 Oldtimers $13.00 9215 Oldtimers 51,533.00 52.144.00 $70.230.00 5322.00 $3.280.00 5228.520.00 520.854.00 52.20000 515,700.00 5; 1.966.00 52.685.00 56.00000 $13.00 9105 9315 950l 9620 9500 9617 Home Improvement RCSC [mprovmts Lions W Lions E Lions LS and Parking Tapia Via Ranchefta Des S20,000.00 $t0,000,00 $203.219O0 $50,000.00 $29,350.00 $91,244.00 $10,000.00 I S769,260.00 [1 3189 9105 9315 9501 9620 9500 9617 Home Impr RCSC lmpro~t Lions W Lions E Lions Ls and Parking Tapia Via Ranchefta Des $20,000.00 $10,000.00 5203.219.00 $50,000.00 529,350.00 $91,244.00 $10,000.00 S769,260.00 FINAL DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Draft March 27, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 2 RESOURCES AVAILABLE ............................................. 2 · Federal Resources ................................................. 2 · Other Resources .................................................. 3 · Leveraging and Matching Funds ...................................... 4 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ....................................... 5 · Affordable Housing ................................................ 5 · Homeless ....................................................... 13 · Homeless Annual Plan ............................................. 14 · Special Needs ................................................... 14 · Special Needs Annual Plan ......................................... 15 · Non-Housing Community Development Needs .......................... 16 OTHER ACTIONS ................................................... 25 · Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs ............................ 25 · Actions to Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing ....................... 25 · Actions to Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing ....................... 25 · Actions to Reduce Lead-Based Paint Hazard ........................... 25 · Actions to Reduce Poverty .......................................... 26 · Actions to Develop Institutional Structure and Enhance Coordination ........................................... 26 · Public Housing Improvements ....................................... 26 · Other Activities ................................................... 27 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ........ : .................................... 28 LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS APPENDIX Certifications Exhibit A - Executive Summary: Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Exhibit B - Maps: Points of Interest, Low-Moderate Areas, Minority Concentrations, Unemployment, and Proposed Projects Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga $F-424 APPLICATION t=OR I=EDE~,L A,5515 I'ANCI= Program: 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Application: 2. DATE SUBMITTED: Applicant Identifier: 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE: State Identifier: 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY: Federal Identifier: 5. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Legal Name: Organizational Unit: Address: County: Contact person: Telephone Number: 6. EMPLOYER ID NUMBER: 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: If revision: N 05/16/97 b-97-MC-06-0556 // // City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA San Bernardino Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner (909) 989-1861 95-213002 C C Preapplication: 91729 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development 10. CATALOG OF DOMESTIC FEDERAL ASSISTANCE NUMBER:14218 Title: Community Development Block Grant 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: Housing Rehabilitation; Sidewalks and Street Improvements; Handicap Accessability Improvements; Publlic Services, Homeless Outreach, Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Mediation, Graffiti Removal, YVVCA, House of Ruth, Foothill Family Shelters 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT: Citywide 13. PROPOSED PROJECT Start Date: 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS: Applicant: 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: Project: Federal: 984000 Applicant: 0 State: 0 Local: ' '0 Other: 0 Program Income: 0 TOTAL: 984000 07/01/97 35 35 End Date: 06/30/98 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS? C / / Page I of 2. SF-424 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Program:CDSG 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? 18. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT: Authorized Representative: Title: Telephone Numbers: Date Signed: William J Alexander Mayor (909) 989-1861 05/07/97 Page 2 of 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga INTRODUCTION In this submission for Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Annual Plan will provide a plan of investment and outline activities expected to be undertaken in order to address the priority needs and local objectives identified by the City and determine goals for individuals and households to be served. RESOURCES AVAILABLE Federal Resources 1. Community Development Block Grant Community Development Block Grant funds are the primary source of Federal Funds available to the City during the coming year. The City's grant allocation available for this year is expected to be $984,000, which is $14,000 less than in 1996-97. The City does not expect to receive any additional program income during the 1997-98 program year. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates over 5,000 Section 8 housing units and has developed, or is in the process of developing, approximately 151 affordable units. The Agency currently owns 16 single family homes in Rancho Cucamonga and rents them to qualified households at affordable rents. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority would include funds for the Section 8 CertificateNoucher Program as well as Comprehensive Grant Improvement Funds. County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development The County receives Federal funds to implement a HOME Consortium. The City joined the County consortium in July 1995. Based on an approximate distribution of the HOME funds, utilizing the CDBG formula, the City's share of funds will be approximately $263,746 of the County's total allocation of $3,365,000. The programs offered are on a first come first serve basis and therefore, it is possible that program benefits to residents of one community may exceed those indicated in the allocated amounts. Page 2 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Other Resources The Redevelopment Agency State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20 percent of tax increment revenue for increasing and improving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. Between July 1, 1994 and June 30, 1999, approximately $23. million dollars will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. Tax increment revenue for 1997-1998 is expected to be $5,082,930. However, it should be noted, that the Agency's tax increment has already been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is actually very little un-obligated funding available for Fiscal Year 1997-98. In July of 1996, the Agency approved in concept, the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) and Northtown Housing Development Corporation, located within the City for affordable housing purposes. This amended all prior pledge agreements and proceeds are used as replacement financing for both agencies. On September 1, 1996, the Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $37.66 million were sold. The total pledge amount from the bond proceeds is 3.6 million annually, combined for both Northtown Housing Development Corporation and Southern California Housing Development Corporation. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with the SCHDC in which $783,333 will be provided annually for five years. Beginning year 6, if the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set- Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $433,333 will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will be available for any Agency housing program. o In addition, the Agency negotiated a pledge agreement through the year 2025 with NHDC in which 1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996 and again on December 30, 1996. Additionally, 5 million in net bond proceeds were paid to NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the North Town neighborhood which includes continuing development of infill housing on vacant lots, acquisition and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing, and the completion of Las Casitas apartments. In addition, the annual pledge amount will be 1.4 million through the year 2025. Page 3 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga .5'7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Leveraging and Matching Funds The primary source of fund leveraging will occur in conjunction with activities carried out through the Redevelopment Agency with 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. This is accomplished through public/private partnerships With non-profit housing development corporations such as the North Town Development Corporation and the Southern California Housing Development Corporation. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME Funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits. Page 4 _ . Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonca Activities to be Undertaken Affordable Housing Objective I - Conservation of the City's existing single-family and multi-family affordable housing stock. Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity: This activity will include not only the acquisition of restricted at-risk units but also those which have not previously been restricted. Lead Agency: The Southern California Housing Development Corporation, with funding assistance by the Redevelopment Agency, will participate in acquisition of these units. Geographic Location: Will primarily occur in the Redevelopment target area; however, units may be acquired citywide. Resources: See discussion under "Redevelopment Agency" resources on page 3. Accomplishments and Time Frame: None further. A total of five complexes, 1,378 total units with 572 held as affordable, have been acquired or assisted using Redevelopment funds, far exceeding annual and five-year goal expectations. The five complexes include: The Pepperwood Apartments (46 of 230 units); Sycamore Springs Apartments (96 of 240 units); Mountainside Apartments (192 of 384 units); Monterey Village Apartments (112 of 224 units); and Rancho Verde Village Apartments (126 of 300 units). Program 1.2: Acquisition and substantial rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. Activity: This program is part of the Northtown Housing Development Corporation's (NHDC), First Time Homebuyer Program. The First Time Homebuyer program provides newly constructed and acquired and rehabilitated single family homes for low- and moderate- income homebuyers. A total of seven homes were acquired and rehabilitated in FY 1996. One additional home is in the process of being rehabilitated. This program functions as part of a larger First Time Homebuyer program and will be reported under Objective 4. Page 5 Community Development Blocl< Grant Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Lead Agency: The Northtown Housing Development Corporation. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Savings of America. See discussion under "Redevelopment Agency" resources on page 3. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The remaining infill home that is being rehabilitated will be either sold or leased for two years to a household with an income between 45 and 60 percent of the area median, (see Objective 4, Program 4.3). As a note: It has been found that this activity is generally more expensive and less cost effective than constructing new homes and therefore, may be used less frequently. Objective 2 -Improve access to affordable housing for all low/moderate income households, with emphasis on production of larger (3+ bedroom) rental units. Program 2.1: New construction of affordable multi-family units. Activity: Construction of a 159 unit affordable senior housing community, Villa Pacifica, that is scheduled to begin construction in 1997 and should be completed in 1998. All units to be held affordable at 50 percent of the median or below. There will be 128 one-bedroom units and 31 two-bedroom units. Lead Agency: Prairie Pacific Development and Orange Housing Development Corporation. Orange Housing is managing the construction and finance, and will act as property managers once occupied. Geographic Location: 4.85 net acres at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. Resources: A total of $3,090,000 in tax increment funds have been pledged as "gap" financing for this project. In addition the Agency is issuing $7 million tax-exempt bonds for the applicant. (The Agency 'will not incur the debt). Additionally, the property is currently owned by the Redevelopment Agency and will be deeded over to the developer for one dollar once the project has been completed. The property is valued at $1,350,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Begin construction in 1997 and project to be completed in 1998. Page 6 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Activity: Complete construction of the 14 one- and two-bedroom rental unit complex, Las Casitas, that are held for small families and seniors. Completion is anticipated in June 1997. NHDC proposes to restrict 7 of the units to households earning 45 percent of the area median income and the remaining 7 to households earning 60 percent of the area median. Lead Agency: Northtown Housing Development Corporation. Resources: See discussion under "Redevelopment Agency" resources on page 3. Accomplishments and Time Frames: It is anticipated that the project will be completed by June 1997 and then rented out in the following fiscal year. NHDC proposes to restrict 7 units to households earning 45 percent of the area median and the remaining 7 to households earning 60 percent of the area median. Program 2.2: Construction of single family infill development in low/moderate income neighborhoods. Activity: This is part of the Northtown Housing Development Corporation's First Time Homebuyer program which provides newly-constructed and acquired and rehabilitated single-family homes for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. NHDC completed the first phase of new construction consisting of 12 homes in March 1996. NHDC has acquired an additional 13 infill lots for an anticipated Phase II of new home construction. Lead Agency: Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the City Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: As this activity functions through the neighborhood non-profit, Northtown Housing Development Corporation, the activity is focused in this target neighborhood. Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set Aside Funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Savings. See discussion under "Redevelopment Agency" resources on page 3. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete construction on 13 new infill homes by June 30, 1998. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3) Page 7 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamoncja Objective 3 - Provide direct renter assistance to extremely low and low-income households in order to obtain or retain permanent housing. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section $ and public housing assistance. Activity: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City in order to apply for Federal funds for additional Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers or public housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications in the future. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Geographic Location: Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers may be located citywide. Single family public housing units are scattered throughout the City. Resources: Federal Housing and Urban Development Funds. Accomplishments and Timeframe: Continue support of at least 166 Section 8 applicants and 16 public housing applications on an annual basis. Program 3.2: Consider providing additional direct tenant assistance through participation in the County of San Bernardino's HOME Consortium. Activity: Direct tenant assistance is offered through the HOME Consortium. As the City is a participating member of the consortium, this activity is now available to eligible residents. The County has designed the program to provide assistance not only to those who meet Federal Preferences, but especially to those who met a "special need." Therefore, the County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. The City will work with the County to publicize this program to residents. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino. Geographic Location: Benefits of the program would be available to all eligible residents. Page 8 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Resources: Federal HOME funds through the County of San Bernardino Consortium. Approximately 1 percent of funds are allocated to this program, or $3,135. Accomplishments and Time Frame: At least one household from Rancho Cucamonga should be assisted through the rental assistance program and at least five assisted through the security deposit program by June 30, 1998. Objective 4 - Increase housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income home ownership, particularly through first-time home buyer assistance. Program 4.1: Administer First-Time Home buyer Program-City Sponsored Activity: The Redevelopment Agency is administering a first-time home buyer program using down payment Assistance Loans. The loan is ten percent (10%) of the purchase price up to a $16,000.00 maximum. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for thirty (30) years. Lead Agency: Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: Eligibility for this program would be citywide. Resources: Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set Aside Funds. $300,000. Accomplishments and Timeframe: By June 30, 1997, the goal is to assist 20 first-time home buyers in the purchase of a new home. Program 4.2: Administer a First Time Homebuyer program through the HOME Consortium. Activity: The County of San Bernardino operates a Home ownership Assistance program in which households earing less than 80 percent of the median income may receive assistance in the purchase of a first home. The City is taking every step to publicize this program to residents. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Community Economic and Development Department. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: Federal HOME funds. The City's approximate allocation is $78,379. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 4 households receive assistance by June 30, 1998. Page 9 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 4.3: Northtown Housing Development Corporation First Time Homebuyer Program. Activity: NHDC's First Time Homebuyer Program provides newly-constructed and acquired and rehabilitated single-family homes for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. NHDC plans to complete Phase II of the project which will involve the construction of 13 new homes on infill lots as well as the rehabilitation of one home. The homes are typically either sold to income-eligible homebuyers earning up to 80 percent of the area median. Or have been leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning between 45 percent and 60 percent of the area median income. At the end of two years, the tenant will be offered an option to purchase if they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for a first mortgage in an affordable amount from Home Savings or another lender. Lead Agency: Northtown Housing Development Corporation. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: As discussed in sections above, the NHDC has received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goal of their affordable housing programs. See discussion under "Redevelopment Agency" resources on page 3. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The completion and leasing or selling of 14 homes to first time homebuyers with incomes between 45 percent and 60 percent of the median income. Objective 5 - Rehabilitation of the City's existing housing stock with emphasis on owner-occupied housing. Program 5.1: Moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low. low- and moderate-income homeowners. Activity: City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning: less than 80 percent of the area median income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $25,000 and grants of up to $5,000, including emergency repair grants. As a note, the City runs this as a full service program. The City not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowners. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done for customer service reasons and ensures efficient and consistent results. Page 1.0 Community Development Block Grant Annual Act/on Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: The program is available to eligible applicants citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funding, $264,858 with $2,544 reprogrammed from funds remaining in the Ledig House project (FY 92-93) and Chaffey Garcia House (FY 91-92). An additional $42,998 is estimated to be carried forward from prior year funds for a total available fund of $310,400 Accomplishments and Timeframe: Provide assistance to 35 households with incomes below 80 percent of the area median by June 30, 1998. Program 5.2: Consider implementation of a rental rehabilitation program. Activity: This is a program is available to residents or local projects through the San Bernardino County HOME Consortium. HOME funds are available for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to low and very-low income residents. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program would be available citywide. Resources: Federal funds through the County HOME Consortium. The City's estimated available allocation is $142,670. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units proposed to be assisted during the 1997-98 fiscal year. However, the City will work with the County to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. Objective 6 - Improvement of the living conditions for extremely low and low-income households. Program 6.1: Continue to support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to enable improvement in living conditions for public housing residents. Page 11 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Activity: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: San Bernardino County Housing Authority. Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal Comprehensive Grant Funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Improvements to the existing public housing units. Page 12 Community Development Blocl~ Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Homeless Objective 1 - Develop a Comprehensive Homeless Assistance Program to assist homeless individuals, families, and persons with special needs, and those at-risk of homelessness. Program 1.1: Continue the support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity: City currently provides assistance to a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short term shelter assistance. The City will continue to address priority needs but will continue to evaluate the possibility of providing transitional shelter assistance. The agencies currently funded include: Homeless Outreach Educations and Programs (HOPE) The agency's offices are located at 213 N. Fern, Ontario, CA. This agency provides assistance to persons who are or are at-risk of homelessness. A variety of services are provided including advocacy, education, shelter voucher, and referrals. Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunger Program (SOVA) The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. The program offers economically disadvantaged residents a five-day supply of food (15 meals total) for all members of a household. In addition advocacy and referral services are provided. House of Ruth Domestic Violence Shelter and Services The main offices are located in Claremont, CA. The mailing address is P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. The House of Ruth offers shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. Foothill Family Shelter Located at 167 North Third Avenue and at 230 and 238 N. San Antonio Avenue in Upland. Provides a 90-day transitional shelter to homeless families with children. Support services are provided to these families to enable them to obtain independent and permanent living situations. Page 13 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits derived from this program occur citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block. Grant Funding HOPE, $6,197; West End Hunger Program (SOVA), $7,000; House of Ruth, $7,600; Foothill Family Shelter, $3,000. ($3,512 for the HOPE program are reprogrammed from prior years (FYS 93-94 & 94-95) and $2,685 is estimated to be carried forward from prior years 95-96). Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 1998, the City will assist homeless or near homeless individuals or families through support of organizations including: Homeless Outreach and Educations (HOPE)- 241 Persons West End Hunger Program (SOVA) - 1,101 Persons House of Ruth - 113 Persons Foothill Family Shelter- 4 families Homeless Annual Plan As discussed in the Consolidated Plan, the City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that will provide a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or who are at-risk of hometessness. Included in these activities would be emergency shelter and shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referrals. Additionally, the City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as an additional means of assisting those who are at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. !t will be encouraged that additional assistance be provided to those agencies that provide longer term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. Special Needs Objective 1 - Provide necessary rehabilitation services to special needs populations with emphasis on assisting the elderly and frail elderly. Program 1.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low- and moderate-income seniors. Page 14 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Gucamonga Activity: The City currently funds the Old-timers Foundation, which is an agency that provides minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low and moderate income residents and senior citizens. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, with a cost of up to $100 per visit and with the allowance for a one-time material charge of up to $250 for emergency situations. In addition to household repairs, the Old-timers Foundation also constructs exterior handicap ramps for disabled residents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program are available to residents citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Old-timers Foundation, $8,013 ($13 will be carried forward from FY 95-96). Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 1998, the Old-timers Foundation will assist at least 50 low- and moderate-income households in the City. Objective 2 - Provide support when possible to service providers assisting special needs populations. Program 2.1: Provide support to special need services in areas where there is significant under-served needs. Activity: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of; physical fitness and well, recreational and educational development, mental health and emotional well-being. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9161 Base Line Road. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds, $3,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 1998 to have assisted 500 persons through these activities. -'. Special Needs Annual Plan Objectives 1 and 2 stated above identify actions the City intends to take over the next year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless but have special needs. Page t5 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan C/ty of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Non-Housing Community Development Needs Objective 1 - Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities in order to enhance living environments and improve the quality of life in low/moderate income neighborhoods and for lower income individuals, seniors, and handicapped. Program 1.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure improvements and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity: Construction of Tapia Via Avenue from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Avenue: This is an expansion to the original Southwest Cucamonga improvement project. Improvements will involve street reconstruction, addition of curbs, gutters, street trees, and streetlights. Work will significantly improve drainage to the south side of the street. As there has been significant resident concerns with this project, the City has and will continue to work with the residents to ensure that the project design is acceptable to them. The biggest question has been wether or not to install sidewalks. Residents were previously opposed and registered their opposition with HUD. Since that time, a majority of residents, through petition, have indicated that they would in fact like sidewalks. The City will request a final determination in writing from residents regarding this issue. Design of infrastructure improvements to Monte Vista Street. from Archibald Avenue to Amethyst Avenue. The City conducted a special survey to qualify this area. Funding will allow for design of infrastructure improvements including street reconstruction, curbs, gutters, streetlights, sidewalks, drive approaches, ramps for the disabled, replacement walls and fences, driveways and landscaping. Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods. The repair of existing sidewalks that have settled by grinding and/or concrete placement. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division. Geographic Location: One. project is located in the Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhood Census Tract 21, Block Group 2, Tapia Via construction. Monte Vista Street, between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue, is located in a larger area which is not a qualified target area, CT20.05 BG1. However, based on staff survey of the area, this street was qualified as a target area and received confirmation from HUD of this on May 24, 1995. Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT21, BG 2,3,6 &7; CT 20.01, BG 4. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funding. Page i6 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Tapia Via Construction, $253,117 total with $123,065 in new grant funds and $23,108 in reprogrammed funds from prior year street projects ($365 from FY 90-91; $7,499 from FY 92-93; $14,798 from FY 93-94; and 536 from FY 94-95) $106,944 carried forward from prior years; Monte Vista design, $25,970; sidewalk grinding, $20,680 ($3,280 carried forward from FY 95-96 for a total of $23,960). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 1998, completion of construction or design improvements for Tapia Via Avenue and Monte Vista Street. Approximately 3,900 Square feet of sidewalk to be replaced. Program 1.2 - Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Parking Facilities Design and Construction. Activity: Will involve the design and construction of improvements to the east side of the Senior Center and the vacant lot to the east of the Center. This project will entail full street improvements to the vacant parcel for Arrow Highway and Alpine Street. These improvements are needed to increase on-site parking and to reduce local street parking caused by some Center events. Improvements will include installation of a street light, parking lights, curbs, gutters, drive approach, undersidewalk drain, pavement, street trees, irrigation and landscaping. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, APN: 209-041,17 and 45, 9791 Arrow Route. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant, $156,196 with $7,884 reprogrammed from FY 94-95 Senior Center Project for a total of $164,080. Program 1.3 - Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Landscape and Irrigation Project. Activity: The project will include the addition of a new meter, as well as replacement landscape material and irrigation equipment throughout the entire site, (excluding the new expansion area). This is necessary as the existing irrigation system is inadequate and much of the existing landscaping has died. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Page 17 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, APN: 209-041-17 and 45, 9791 Arrow Route. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant; $29,050. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete the design for the new irrigation system and landscaping by June 30, 1998. Program 1.4 - Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Expansion and Renovation. Activity: This year will fund the design for this project. To provide a better functioning facility the following modifications are proposed: 1) Remodeling the Mission Room to add a small stage and storage area; 2) Enclosure of the west patio to create a climate controlled solarium and the addition of an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvern; and 3) Modifications including an entry corridor and windows to the northeast side of the building to allow public access from the new parking lot and to provide visual security to the building. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, APN: 209-041-17 and 45, 9791 Arrow Highway. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant, $40,310. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete the design for the proposed improvements by June 30, 1998. Program 1.5 - Assistance League Parking Lot Improvements. Activity: To make available 40 parking spaces which are currently surplus and owned by the Assistance League of Upland. The parking lot was previously owned by the Chino Basin Water District. The project includes removal of brush, installing a secondary fence with a moveable gate, relocation of security system and striping the lot. The project would benefit both the Senior Center and the Assistance league, the latter whose primary function is in assisting low income individuals with a thrift store and possibly low cost medical/dental services. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: 8555 Archibald Avenue, APN: 209-041-47. Page 18 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant; $7,550. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Completion of all parking improvements by June 30, 1998. Objective 2 - Continue to fund local and public service agencies that function to improve the quality of life for lower income persons and those with special needs. Program 2.1 - Fund public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories, including youth-at-risk, fair housing. landlord/tenant counseling. food distribution. and battered women's shelter as well as job development and recreation opportunities for the disabled. Activity: The City will continue to utilize its resources to fund public service agencies, including: YWCA Y-Teen and YW-Pact Programs Programs to assist junior high and high school aged girls. The programs are offered at the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School and at Alta Loma High School. The Y-Teen program provides junior high aged girls with a weekly after school club type environment in which many at-risk and health-threatening behaviors are addressed. The YW-Pact is a program to empower teens and teen parents who in turn share this information and counsel other teens. Fair Housing The City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Drive, Ontario, CA 91762, to provide public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Landlord Tenant Mediation The City contracts with Inland Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762, to provide landlord/tenant dispute mediation services as well as to provide information and referrals to City residents. Page 19 Community Development Bloc/( Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga 7¢ City of Rancho Cucamonga Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunger Program (SOVA) The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 6.35 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. The program offers economically disadvantaged residents a 5-day supply of food (15 meals total) for all members of the household. In addition, advocacy and referral services are provided. House of Ruth Domestic Violence Shelter and Services The main offices are located in Claremont, California. The mailing address is P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. The House of Ruth offers shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children's programs. YMCA- West End Kids Club An after school recreational program offered to students from low-income families attending Bear Gulch school or who live in the immediate area. The program provides the kids with a safe and fun environment after school while participating in a variety of positive activities. In addition, the kids are also introduced to the YMCA's character development curriculum which teaches caring, respect, honesty, and responsibility. YMCA- Northtown/Your Own Club This program is offered to middle school aged kids in the Northtown neighborhood as an after school activity. The program will generally be run from the Old Town Park but will locate at Villa Del Norte Community Center in inclement weather. The program seeks to promote the development of responsible, capable youth through structured after school alternatives. The program is designed to foster self-reliance, awareness, confidence and respect. Additionally, the program seeks to instill core values as well as cooperation and respect for others. · . ©PARC - Woodshop and Yard Crew Programs This program provides vocational training, experience and economic support to adults with developmental disabilities through two programs. As part of the yard crew program 6 Rancho Cucamonga residents would be taught skills necessary to be part of a yard crew. Page 20 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamon~Ta 7'/ City of Rancho Cucamonga They would then take employment with local businesses. An additional 8 Rancho Cucamonga residents would be taught wood working skills. This service will be provided by the Association for Retarded Citizens, Ontario Pomona (OPARC), located at 8939 Vernon Avenue, Suite L, Montclair, CA 91763. Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy This program provides therapy and recreation to disabled individuals in a broad range of age groups. Opportunities for disabled individuals to participate in horseback riding, which has particular and therapeutic value in the total rehabilitative process. Funds will be used for instructor training at conferences and tuition assistance. It is estimated that 105 Rancho Cucamonga residents will receive assistance. This service is provided by the Rising Starts of Equestrian Therapy, located at 8401 Bella Vista and Heritage Park. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefit from these programs will be provided to residents citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funding. YWCA, $7,000 Fair Housing, $10,344 with ($160 reprogrammed from FY 94-95 and $1,966 carried forward from FY 95-96 for a total of $12,470) Landlord/Tenant Mediation, $10,062 West End Hunger Program (repeat) (SOVA), $7,000 House of Ruth, $7,600 YMCA - West End Kids club, (A total of $6,000 will be carried forward from FY 95-96) YMCA Northtown/YOC, $5,000 OPARC, $3,000 Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy (RESET), $3,000 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By.June 30, 1998, the following numbers of individuals and households will have received assistance: Fair Housing - 50 Persons Landlord/Tenant- 315 Households YWCA - Y-Teen - 40; YW-PACT - 65 House of Ruth - West End Hunger Program (SOVA) - 1,800 Persons YMCA - West End Kids Club - 85 Persons Page 21 Community Development Block Grant Annual Act/on Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga ?S City of Rancho Cucamonga YMCA- Northtown/YOC - 28 Students OPARC- 14 Persons RSET - 105 Objective 3 - Ensure accessibility to all public facilities and structures. Program 3.1 - Provide complete handicap improvements to the Lions Center Facility. Activity: Lions West is the City's primary community center. Handicap improvements required to bring Lions West into conformance with ADA requirements are extensive and involve widening rooms and hallways, constructing a new handicap accessible entrance, as well as new hardware. Improvements to Lions West have been intended for several years and funds have been allocated each year toward completion of this work. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division. Geographic Location: The Lions Park Community Center is located at 9161 Base Line Road. However, as this is the main community center for the City, improvements will benefit handicapped residents citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds; Lions West, $75,581. Estimated total funds available on July 1, 1997, $577,550. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 1998, for Lions West - to have completed all design work and begun construction of improvements to the structure. Program 3.2 - Installation of handicap ramps at all curb returns. Activity: This program has been underway for several years and provides handicap accessible improvements to all inadequate curb returns in the City in order to make all streets accessible to handicapped individuals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division. Geographic Location: All curb returns throughout the City. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds; Wheelchair Ramps, $19,175 with $1,855 carried forward from FYs 94-95 & 95-96, for a total available of $21,030. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The addition of handicap ramps at. all curb returns within the City approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing. Page 22 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Objective 4 - Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to implement the City's CDBG Program and the provisions of the Consolidated Plan. Program 4.1: Continue to fund necessary planning and administrative activities each year. Activity: Includes research and analysis with regard to completion of program applications, performance reports, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, housing documents and the like. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefits of the program are eligible citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funding, $129,719 with reprogramming from FYS 94-95 & 95-96 of $9,881 for a total of $139,600. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Completion of all administration and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. Additionally, work to ensure functioning capability of the IDIS system. Objective 5 - To revitalize and upgrade housing conditions; prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences; and eliminate conditions detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare. Program 5.1 - Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and Code Enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Activity: The City currently funds a Home Rehabilitation program in which, through the course of that activity, the improvements mentioned above would be completed. Therefore, a separate activity or program will not be developed. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of the Home Improvement Program are available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There will be no accomplishments listed separately as improvements will occur for residents eligible for the Home Improvement Program. Page 23 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 5.2- Continue to fund a Graffiti Removal Program. Activity: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents of graffiti as quickly as possible. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including Census Tract 21, Block Groups 2, 3, 6, and 7 and Census Tract 20.01, Block Group 4. Also, the Monte Vista Target neighborhood may become eligible during the year. Resources: Community Development Block Grant Funding; Graffiti Removal, $24,840. With $2,200 in prior year funds carried forward total available will be $27,040. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The removal of approximately 14,999 square feet of graffiti by June 30, 1998. Objective 6 - The alleviation of physical and related economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization. Program 6.1 - Review and Evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Activity: Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. The City has formed a task force to review the planning and land use issues along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Approximately six miles of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete an analysis of Foothill Boulevard with recommendations regarding revitalization and land use by June 30, 1998. Page 24 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan C/ty of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga OTHER ACTIONS Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs was a lack of available resources. However, this is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to do all three by forming public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME Funds in order to better leverage available funding. Actions to Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing The majority of the Objectives and Actions identified as part of this plan are specifically aimed at increasing or maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. Actions to Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or ameliorated. All of the regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. Actions to Reduce Lead-Based Paint Hazard In conjunction with the Community Development Block Grant Program, the City will continue to implement current Federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG Funds, all owners and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. !n addition, units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of 7, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the Redevelopment Agency also follow the same guidelines as those used for the CDBG Home Improvement Program. Page 25 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Actions to Reduce Poverty Generally, the City has relatively little control over the many factors which may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City toward this end would be the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving funding from the City. Additionally, most of the activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. Additionally, the City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing will hopefully increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. Actions to Develop Institutional Structure and Enhance Coordination The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this end is the increasing expertise of staff and the Council which in turn will increase efficiency and effectiveness. An additional activity would be to increase contact and coordination among internal City Departments. The City shall continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. Public Housing Improvements Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority in that the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the CHAS and now the Comprehensive Plan. · Monitoring Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that Federal funds are being spent in a manner consistent with the National Objectives of the CDBG program and that programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines the basic monitoring requirements that are followed in implementation of the CDBG program: Page .26 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Standards Utilized for Review · Is the program meeting intended objectives? Is the agency capable of tracking/documenting necessary benefit information and is it capable of carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with Federal requirements? · Is appropriate documentation submitted correctly in a timely manner? Monitoring Procedures CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS All construction projects are expected to comply with Federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity requirements required by various Federal and state laws. To ensure this end, the CDBG staff has developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines in detail the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. Additionally, the CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, pre-construction meetings, and on-going project inspections, including review of weekly payroll documents. SUBRECIPIENT AGENCIES All subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which the scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. Agencies must submit detailed information regarding number and type of individuals benefitted with City CDBG funds on a monthly basis. Additional quarterly summation reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in the past quarter. Finally, the City conducts an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. Other Activities Generally, other activities funded through the CDBG program that do not fall under the above headings, are required to provide adequate documentation to ensure that appropriate eligible individuals are benefitting from the program and that all appropriate Federal procurement regulations are being followed. This is generally accomplished through the provision of monthly activity reports and through continual review of activities with the CDBG Coordinator. Page 27 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Fair Housing The City has contracted with the Inland Mediation Board since 1984 to provide education and enforcement of State and Federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. Having Inland Mediation Board administer, the City's Fair Housing Program assures that there are no impediments to fair housing choices in the program. In addition, affirmative outreach to program applicants most likely to experience impediments to fair housing choices at the hands of private individuals is assured, since the Inland Mediation Board routinely targets its fair housing program outreach programs to such persons. Recently, Inland Mediation Board conducted an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A summary of the analysis is attached as Exhibit "A." CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a truly representative and useful Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps toward ensuring adequate public participation were taken: A quarter page display ad providing notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published on October 25 and 26, 1996, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and La Voz newspapers. The notice was also posted on the local cable TV channel for approximately a month. Copies of the notice were also mailed to approximately 78 households and organizations. A notice of public hearing regarding the preliminary selection of projects and to accept views of citizens on housing and community development was published as an eight page display ad on February 16, 1997, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, La Voz and La Opinion newspapers. Copies of the notice were mailed to approximately 78 individuals and organizations. The public hearing was held on March 19, 1997. Individuals representing 7 public service agencies spoke to the Council. At that meeting, the council recommended that two additional public service providers receive funding, OPARC and Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy. Finally, a public notice regarding the availability of the final draft consolidated Annual Action Plan for review and notice of the final public hearing was published on March 27, 1997 as an eight page display ad in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and La Voz newspapers. Letters indicating document availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino and the Housing Authority Page 28 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga of San Bernardino County. Copies of the notice were mailed to approximately 20 individuals and organizations. Copies of the plan were made available for review at the City Hall, the City Library, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and at the Lion's Center. The public hearing was held on May 7, 1997. Page 29 Community Development Blocl( Grant Annual Act/on Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga §ooo~ooo§ ~ ~ 0 '- 0 n...I o o o ZZ z~rn 9E o.- 1~.0 co.--'- o o o~'~ ZZZu30 >-Z ~ 0 o 0"' ..jz >.. Z Z ,.o (..) o .ILl ~3 ::3 0 ~ ~ 0 Z ILl ~z .ILl ZZZu30 , z ~.lJJ eoo~°O >- Z Z u~ 't' c:~j co -..--- o lq... n Z Z Z~(.) a.o n oo~. o 'z'~ 0 (3 ~oz .UJ ~- 0 (:3 o. o o. z &E · T-~ 0 0 i,m 0 0 ~. 0 o o o~°'~ ZZZ~O u. 0 ~ U.I 'r r~ O. ~ I-- n o o o ILl ZZZ~m ~- O n. 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ o ~. ~. z -t,, ~ 0 ZZZ~O (..) cO n,' n ILl .LLI o o Z Z Z~n (.> 0 ~ ~ 0 o o o~-'~ ZZZ~O <~ 0 /// APPENDIX CERTIPICAT[O.WS :%J'f'u'madvely Further Fair IIou_sing --The jurisdic~iun will affl,,.-mafively fUF'l~e,: fair huus:_ng, means i: ,vii! conduct an analysi~ of hnpcdi.m:a;~ to fair hou$in~ choice within h., jurisdic:ion ,.ake '~ ~,",,, appropfia[e acfiens ~o overcome the effec~ of any hmpzdJmenr. s ide::dfi-~.d t~---ough [ha~ ana!}'s}s, and maintain records r~f]~cfing r.,hac am~.lysis and actions 'm '&it r~gard. Anti-cUsplacement and Relocadon Plan - it ,.,,'ill comply wkh ~.e ac,'lu~skJon and relec~rion requirements of ~n~ Umfo~n Re!ocat~on A~s:mnc~ mud R~a! Prop~r~y Acqu~i~on Policies Act of 1970, n~p..m~nnno r~gulatio~ z~ ~9 CFR ~ ~' ' " ~-, and ~c has in ~c[ .. fo]!ov,,~g a r~sid~n~ia! anfidisolacem~nt ~nd r~toca:ion ass~smnc~ ~;an rgaulzed under s=c~ion ~ 04(d) ~f ~:h~ Housing and Co~upJ~' Development Act of I97~, ~ ~nd~d, in comn~cfion with any acfivky ~sfmt~d wkh fiar, Cin~ und.~r :h~ CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace - I: will or wfil continue to prcvid~ a drag-fr:e wcrk.~lac.~ by' Pub!isb;ng a $umm~ru neti~'ing ~mploy=es *&a~ dn~ unla~al ~,~ac~:, d~ri~ution. dispersing, possession, or use of a control!~d ~b~c¢ is prohibk~d in uh¢ gr~:ee'~ wor'~lace and ~:~zing ~he acticp~ n~[ will be ~<=n ~gairj~ ,mployees for viola:ion of such prohibition; E~stab!ishing an ongoLn. g drag-free awareness pro~mm ~o inform ¢mploye~s about - .~ ~';, dmn~rs of d~_,g abuse in the T~-~ ~,-~'=~'~ :o![cv of mzin:aknh~ ~ dmg-f:~e '" -" -:' z~e ~e~:i~s ~z~ may be '~os~d u~on cmploye~s for dr~g abuse violadcns occu~'mg · g:ven a [: a requirement. that each employee :o be engaged in n~,e perfonv. ance of :h.~. gra= be copy of ~he statgmenr required by pm-a~.zph t' cmpio'/men~ under dze gmn:, nh~ employee vdH - - (a) Abide by dae :erms of h~e sta:emen:; ,_zd ~) employer Ln wri:.;n~ of his or her conviction for a · .-:r-~..- ag-mcv in wrkZ_~ ~4:hin ten ca:e::da, davs ~ter ~,~;,.; .... ; ~ ,,,..~.,~ off;~' ,~r O~h~r designee on who~ ~-: ac;?,'im' ~h~ convicted emnl,~}'~e was ~;'o~.d~ uni=~s ~clud~ i~e identification number(s) of-~,' affected ~) R~quiri:lg such ~.mp!o~,'e~ to parzi,zipz:¢ sa. isfac:orily in a d..-.'g abus~ assisr. a.,.,ce reha~ilkadon progr:m~ approved for suzla pu.moses by a F~.de::t, $.:ate, or local I=..w enfor~;'..~en~, or od~er zppropriat-~ agency; Making a good fakh _,:~ ...... n...~.o.. paragraphs I, '~, ". 4, 5 and 6. .-knti-Lobb],ing -- To tb.,,.' best of d:~ jufisdizdon's k:'.o'.vlcdge. and b~-iiaf: No Federal appropriazed iznds have been ..-,aid or will be paid, by or on be~'~;f of person for k'-.fiucncing or azemp~iag m inn..,;.?:'- an officer or amp!o':'e Member of Congress, an officer or empIoy~ of Congress. or an ~mp!o,,,'¢~ of a Member of Congt'~as in co.:m¢c.-.ion ,:,'i~h a:: aw:~ding of an',,' Federal con~ract, d~e ma:4ng of a.n)-Federal grant, :b.e making of any F'~d~.ral loan. dee en~=~fing into of ..my coop~mdv~ exz=nsion. continuation, renewal. amendment., or modification of aay Fed.~ral con~ac~, gram, loan. or coopera:iv= agr-~emenz; If any fun&s o~i'4r ~an F-.'der~d appropria:ed fur.ds have b~,n paid or will be ~aid to :my person · for in..-'lu~n:ing or aa-~r'zp:Lug ~o k,.fluanc. e a'~ officer or em.:loyze of a:v a*,'ncv .-, M._.mbcr of Congress, ~n ameer or ,.m~..o,,,,. of Congress, or a.n m."noloyee of a ..Xfembcr of Coni,'-r~s L2 termeorion wi:h ~',.is F-~der~ zon.:ra:.'., grant, ioan, or zooeer~d,,'e ag:~.m. ent, i~ will cornplea_~ .,-o,m m R:~o~ Lobbvizg ' L"t azcordz,.ce with gild ~" .uo ....5[mud:'.rd Fo~,-m-LLL 'Disclosu ~'- , i:s insn'uzn.3ns; and It ~'fil rezui~ :'::az d,-- I,,n~n~e-- of maragraoh ~ ,~'~ ~ of gnb and-lobbying · (u.clu,.:--, ,_4 subcom. rac~. knclud~c in th. a-~'ard docun',:nu for all. subawards at all .'.i-'_rs '"' subgran~s, and zonerazes under granr. s. ioa;,z, and coo:,-:.ra:ive agre~z-.e.-,.~s) subr-zcim!er,..'.s shall c~r:ifv and disciose Authority of Jurisd.iaion - The cor'.soli~:-~d plan is au:~.oriz~-d und=r So?- and local law (~ applicable) and :'m~ juHsdiczicn .possess--s ,-".~ !.~gat aumorir/co carc.' out the p:'ograms for wL;ch i: is se~.'..-~,.mg f,.mding, in a...~.o. d_n,,. '~,'i.-& a:o! fzab!~- H UD regu!az;.or.~. Consistency ~i~:h plan -- T'rt~ .b..._,-using ac~vir. ies :o be. u::dermk~n ',;,'i:h CDBG, HOME. ESG, ?_~.d HOPWA fund~ ~: co~is:-~n~ '.~'i.'_'.'~ th~ sara:ecSc ~i,,~ Section 3 -- rr will ~'n,:-~.-~iv ,":°:, $~ccion ~' of d",-~ mcus:m.z ant Urban "~ .... ' imntgmeunng re_,-uizUo::s a.'. 24 C.b'R Fart. 135. //,-/ SpedCc CDBG C~mi~cafion~ ComraunJty D.evelopment Plan - ITs ¢onsolida:~d h..;._.,.,,~ and comn',.unky d:','~!o.mn~nc :o!.,~l ': .... ~,~- com~.unkv d:ve!e.:m:n: and ho '.uaing ::¢~ds and rpecifi:s both shorr-re,,'m and 1o,~-~.nn corrznuni%' d~veloomem cbjecfivea than provide dec:n~ housing, expand economic oppo~anifi~ prima:ily for p~rso~ of io'~ and mod~ra~= incem~. (S~ C~ 24 5~0.2 and CFR 24 Following a Plan - it is following a curtam consolida::d plan (or Compreher~ive Housing '1' . ,~ ,t Affor~b;,!% S~m;~gy) :ha: has oe~n approved by MUD. Use of Funds - it: has complied wi:h ~he following cri~.:ria: Maximum Feasible Pri9ritv. With r~sp~c: ;o '~"~': ":*' ,v~.,.~ exoec:~d :o be assis~ wi~ CDBG ~nds, {: '~;q~- ~hat k has d~,op,d iu At:ion . so m az:ivifi:s which henri: low ad nod=rate hxzom= f~fi!ies or aid in ~e pr~v~mion or =lin~ion of slum~ or bligh:. Th~ Action Plan ~y also ~nclude acdviti~ ce~fi~ arc d:sign~d m m~:~ o~har co~uni;y developmen n~ds hav~g a pa~icular because :x~:ing condido~ posa a sario,~ and L~mediag, co~%mu~j:y, ~nd o~er ~anaiat r~ources are no~ available); O:'::'a!l ~:aefi.:. Th~ ao~,,.e,,,~. use of CDBG funds including scot'ion 108 _.ma.,ra:,.mad Ioa~ durhg program year(s) !99Ja., [qq 7 (a .period specified by the g'r. mnr=e consisling of c.n.~, two, or .:hrte sp~.cific com~ecu.tiv¢ program years), shall .principally benefit persons of low and modern:: intern~_ in a manner that :nsures fig~: z,: !:as~ 70 ?erainc of ,~1: amour.: is ~:.mend:d for aztivitits nha: beneft: such persons dm-ing ,2-.= d:signa,::d period; as~ted ~dnh CDBG ~nds inz!uding S~z:ion 108 loan gu~'anm=d Dands by canning any ~our.; agah~ proTeme$ o'*~ and occupi~a by persor~ of low and m~ra~: incore:, inc!ud~ng any fee ~--=-'~ or assessman: re:d- as z condition of obt~-Zng access to such Ftow~:-:r, if CDBG funds are used :o pay :h~ pro..porz. iom of a fee or asses~-rr..en~ tlnat ~.~ capkal ces:s of public im~rovem~na (~siaM in pan wid~ CDBG ~nds) onher ~*~,,~ sour:es, an ~sessment or ~,,a.5. may b~ made :o :he publ{c hmprovem:r,u fim~n~d by a sou::~ o,&er ~nm~ CDBG 7Sae iurisdicfion will not arc. era:,: to r~.cov-_r aW ~:iml zos,:~ of public ',~, ?- · -,,*- wi'da CDBG f,?nds, including Section I08, m~ss CDBG funds are used to pay [qe. - 7 "'; '~ of D,O~.O..,0.. ;~','~.',' sou:ess. L"l uhis *"s" an ~sessm. ent or :i,zrga mav be ma~" agai..',a: the :,ro.:.er'./ :m~m.._ by a sourca case of pmpcrt!~s own:d and occ. u,oied by mod~_..'a:e-;n¢ome (no' ~,"'.': ...... "fa?2Ii,:s an '-'""-~--" , be made --ir~'c 'h,. pror;.,~17"./for Dubtic l~iP~'0v:111:111.i azse$.~.-r'.~-Et Or ,..,,-.:=~. may a~a , ." . . . ' _ source oth,.:r :i-.an CDBG funds if :he jurisdiction cemif,:es ,:ha: 1: lack. s CDBG Oar. ds to Excesa-ive Force -- i~ has adapcad and i~ --nforzing: CompLi~mce With Anti-discrimination laws -- ::e -~r_,,~ w:i: b¢ conducted a:d a&micJs:e:~ci in confo:~ity wi:h fitie Vt of Cne Civil Rig'n~ .&ca of 196:(:2 L:SC 2000d), :he Fab Ho~ing A.c~ (42 USC 3601-3619). and ' ~ .... ;~'= '~" CompLiance with Laws - 2 ,,~.":2 comply' '~'kh appi{cabl¢ laws. .o · . S pec','fic HOME panisipa'ing ju~dicrion's co,.~oltd~,.d elton for exo&nd~ng {he summir, affordzb~iN', and Eligible Activities :,red Costs - it is u.qing and wH! use HOME funds :'or described in ~"' ' ' ~ CFR ~ 92.205 through 92.209 and 5nat ~r ~s nor using =rid will met ~e ~OME mn~ for prohibited acrivi:i~, as d~scribed in t 92.2!4. Appropriate Financial .~sismnce - helots ,r~,-~.-.,;.,i..,, ,nv ~,n.J$ ro ', .~rojec: ir will ev,~u, :, ~ne HOME f~ds in :ombinanon wire orh:: ~'=der~d ~s~znc~ fi~an is n=ce~mp' :o provid~ affor.!zblg hous~g; Tk!~ / //7 4PPEN~IX TO CF. RTiFICATION5 r:N'£T?,: ".'-T':CN$ ~'%'"-'-'~ ....... r'] , ,,;,m ,,L'C.- , ~... ',,_=:,.',l.xv LOBB :'x'G D~ FREE ...... ;" '- for m~'~=,~ or en~arLng in~o ~is capsaction :m. pos~d by s~cnon !352, :it!~ x, U $. Cod~ .~v person who"" to a -iv5 penaiD' of no~ less than SlO,000 and no~ mor¢ d~an SlO0,000 for each such, faiiura. B. Dru_~-Fre= V,"ork~lace Certification placed when d,,: agency awards :&e grin'-.:. If i: is Ia~-'_r d::.-~,-m.Lnid that :.inc gntn=e= '.<nowKngiy r~ndered a fah~ c.'r:ification. or o.::her',v{s: vio!a~.:s r.h¢ requirements of fi'i~ Drug-Free Work-plat_ A¢:, HUD, in addison to any or.i',.~:r rz:nedies avai!zbl~ ~o ~he Federal GovsrnmsnL may ~ake action aud':.oriz~d uz,'2~r t.".:: D.,-ug-Fre~ We,"k'place AcL Work.nlac¢s under gran[s, for gr. am..%-,s orJ".=r zl.".,.a.,-,. ~dividua~, ae~d not be iden~:ifi...-d on :h~ d'.e gr=-r.~ aaatica:ior,.. If ~h-- ........ = ..... or u.r, on a',:'~-rd. ;.-' r/t-.r: ~s no p.,-, '.-',,:'--, ' .... . . .. gr:-m.:~.e .must keea ~ue identiq.., ::f d~e ',,vork..-pia:~.(s) on ~te Ln i.:s office ""'~ ,':'_,,_'<= dqe i.-.fo..,-madon ;' ' ' : <-.,,.ify all known v.o,,~p;a~:s ~,...-;~.;. .. .t. t ~ · ',"~ .,-~.S V ~, ,,o-.: ~_ vvo..-:<-c. jl:.~ r.%uir,,.m:nzs. 'WorL.-piac= id-.:".:i:%atio..-,..s mu~: mctud= r2,.e ac:ua! add:~.ss of buildLugs (or o.zrrs of buildings) or or.,h.~r sires whet: .,,,o;.x und-:r due gr-,_-.z: ',~:ee Ca..-egorisal descriadons may h-~ used r- =, ..!~ ',-=h~cl~ of a ~,.--~ . ~ -.~ .,~. ~-~., ma~s .:ransit au~-.oN? or St=.:-. highw=_y d:par'nr,,,=nr '*'i'd!a i..n ageration. Scat=- :m?!oy~es in ;ach loca! ..... ?~] ."~-~.' '- . ' ,~,,-,-.~.,..'.:_.~ Ori'.!C-~, ,~-'~-:fO:W'f'.~r$ l~. co,uc.-'r~ h.aJ!s or radio ', -i ,, .::,,.a,.,o,~). . . perfo=~c~ of the gram. ~he gmn~ sh21! info,m ~he agency of :~- T!,.e gr.,~-,.:~e m:?' inset: 2-: .:i-.e s=a.:-_ ::o,.'i.'3ed b-:low :h, sir-_(s) for :he .~:rfo..'m.,':anc.~ of work done ~,~ -- ....-'~., " - ... ,...,.-.....,.Iv.. ':,,'t:;'. [~.e ..s,-,egiZlc gza,':: : ',2 ~ansho Cucamong~ Ci:y Hail ~'0500 C~vic Cen~ar Dr Rancho Cu¢~mo~g~. C~ 91730 · ' n ~ The cer[ifica,don wkh r~$.ard [o u~e dmJz-ff~e ='~-.-.'~-~ is r~quire~ by ~: CFR ~ ~.,, i~. . of term~ in the Nonprocuremon: Su$p~nsio.n and and Drug-Free NVork~l~:c :ore_room r~i~ ~pply :o ~hls "Con~rollod subs'~nc~." means a conu-o!led subs,rance ,:n Sch~.dules I rJ~reugh V ef dne Cont~otI:d Sub$m?.~s A:: (2! U.S.C. 8!2) amd as fur-d-~:r d:t~.n~d b?' :egu!a:ien (21 CFR !308. ! ! through 1308. !~); "Cenvic:ien" m.:ans a .~inc.'in~ of ~i!t r:-,-n,-;;-~, ~ $ie,',. of nolo :on~...ndcrc) or im~,9~i:io~~. o:' sen:eric=. or be,..h, by any judi:i'-.d body :barged ,:~'inh '~.e respo.nsibilip' :o de;e,,-nine vio[a[io~ of [he Star= crimJ~ dru'~ 'Cr4_mina! drug sm.'.u~e' meav_s a Federa! or non-Federal c,n',?_Lnal d,s..,~ ..o,,, d,-%?-~mg ,,so, . invo[vin_~ the, -~, -'a,,- ....: t-;' ~.; - ' ' "Employee" me'a~ ~e e..,np!o>'ee of a gr=_ntee direc:.!y engaged performance of ~'or'.< under a gran:, ~clc '~g: (i) All involvement b ~i~ifl~v.: co nhe 7~:~'--~ of ~e g~n~; ~mpor~' petsmtso! and co~a[~nu ~"no ~r~ direcdy ~--:~-~ ~crfo~g~c~ of work under i~e grant =~d ~'ho = ~ . payroU. ~s d=~nk~on ~oes no~ inc:.ud~ workers no~ on One ~mte: (e.g.. volunteers. ~, - T~ir~rli~[; ' '~"~ '~ ' . EXHIBIT A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING A literature search was conducted in several areas; housing discrimination, City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element, the Grantee Performance Report 1994-1995, Federal and State fair housing laws, area demographics, national, State and local housing policies, public housing, 1990 census data, historical racial housing problems in renting and real estate purchases, zoning and discrimination correlation. Surveys were used to accumulate the data base. These surveys were formulated to gather information on housing discrimination, fair housing knowledge, quality of the present housing, and other information which could help housing policy makers to identify problem areas. 1. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data was requested from eight lenders. 2. Eight lenders showed activity within the City. . Individual interviews were completed with tenants, property management and owners, and realtors. o Additional information and statistical data was contributed by CDBG City staff, County of San Bernardino Housing Authority, California Department of Fair Employment and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Fair Housing Division. FINDINGS The data compilation identified the following major findings: Discrimination Issues · lack of understanding fair housing laws/differential treatment; · unequal terms/differential treatment; · buyer refusal; · lenders HMDA data tracking; and · tracking lender's housing loans. Housing Issues affordable housing (both rental and for purchase); · neighborhood safety; · housing and rental deterioration in neighborhoods; · transportation; and · good schools. FAIR HOUSING ACTION PLAN The following plan of action outlines strategies reflecting the survey findings. Workable objectives have been identified in Rancho Cucamonga's Impediments to Fair Housing. Fair Housing The City's contracted Fair Housing provider needs to intensify efforts in the following areas: 1. To educate rental property owners and managers to their responsibilities under the fair housing laws: · educational courses · newsletters · workshops 2. Target the renting population through an on-going fair housing educational program: public workshops high school students/parents group adult education . Monitor lending practices of major lenders under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment commitment to improve the City's housing. 4. Accomplish media outreach by: feature articles and paid ads in local newspapers; radio announcements used for public spots; regular periodic radio programs in Spanish; and provide information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews provided in certain communities. , Network with both Federal and State Fair Housing Departments and other related services to assist the complainant. 6. Network with the Association of Realtors and the Apartment Rental Owners Association as technical advisor. 7. Mediate/reconcile complaints of discrimination. 8. Assist complainants in filing charges with enforcement agencies. . Promote April as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry, and the general public. 10. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising which is written in such a way as to discriminate against certain groups in housing. 11. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of any local housing related plan. 12. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bernardino Housing Authority for the Section 8 certificate and voucher program. CITY PROGRAM The City retains the responsibility of establishing the direction, providing a yearly monitor and evaluating the performance of these various functions. Maintenance and preservation of housing rehabilitation of the City's substandard housing. · Aggressive marketing of rehabilitation money to rental and home owners. · Housing taskforce to identify areas needing property revitalization. 0 0 Z 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ U ._ U o ~ I o o u o o '~ o i' 0 U - . -, o o o U ,..ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA % Unemployment By Bk~-~ Group .. Oto 2 ~'~ 2to 4 LJ 4to 6 ~ 6to 8 ii~ 8to ~C33 MAP 3 - Entire community showing low-rood (51%) areas outlined and unemployment Upland Orrtano ~oum ~ak~y.-Wn9htwood % (Black+Hisp+Asian/Pac0 By Block Grou~ '~' 0to 3D =20to 40 ~40to ~ t~ ,~ to 80 MAP 4 - Entire communiW showing low-rood {51%) areas outlined and minority concentration CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Proposed Projects . % Unemployment i By Block Group i '"':~ :. :- Oto 2 ; . ' BI 2to 4 ~ 4to · 6to ~ 8 to ~00 · MAP ~ - CDB~ p~oposecl p~o~ects with % ~nemp~oyment by b~ock g~o~p a~d ~ow-moci area To: From: Date: Subject: Memorandum City Manager's Office Mayor and Members of txhe~ity Council Jack Lam, City Manager ¥ _ April 23, 1997 Mobile Substation/Command Post Background. Consistent with the City's goal of providing proactive law enforcement, creative crime prevention measures, and promoting greater community participation in public safety programs, it is proposed that the City acquire a "mobile substation." This mobile substation would be fully equipped to function as a mobile office. Crime prevention activities can be taken directly into the community and special neighborhood programs can be conducted from the vehicle as well. The vehicle would be equipped with communications and other special emergency equipment so that in times of emergencies or conduct of special programs, it can function as a command center. Both Police and Fire communications equipment is to be included. Past neighborhood programs and other emergencies have shown the need for such a useful dual purpose vehicle. It's multi-purpose capabilities will mean that the vehicle will not sit idle "waiting for an emergency," but be well utilized as a complement to the traditional fixed substation. The development and acquisition of the mobile substation is another creative approach to strengthening the community oriented policing program in Rancho Cucamonga and provide an effective emergency and special operations command center during times of emergencies. Recommendation. Authorize the acquisition of a mobile substation/command center vehicle utilizing asset seizure fun& not to exceed $100,000. /'d '7 FROM.' A~ay -, 199.' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT · I,4 CK LAM, CITY MANAGER CITY OF RANCHO C U(_;4JVI()NGA RODNEY H. HOOPS, CHIEF OF POLICE RANCHO C UCAMONGA POLICE DEPAR Ig/ZENT 1977 SUBJECT: MOBILE COMMAND POST/SUBSTATION 7'he City o.f Rancho Cucamonga is recognized both nationally and in Southern California as a leader among communities. This has been achieved through progressive and innovative planning which has allowed the City to remain a model for others. As the City continues to grow, there becomes more of a need, on a daily basis, to consider current and future public safety needs. Rancho Cucamonga has long maintained its status as a safe place to "live and work". [n order to maintain our level of public safety service, it is necessary to be proactive in our approach in providing a visible and available service to the citizens. It is also necessary to have the means and equipment available to address major public safety incidents which occur in the City, as recently experienced with the major fire at the north end of Etiwanda Avenue. Therefore, it is proposed that the City purchase a vehicle that can serve as a combination mobile "commandpost/substation". In the event of a major incident, the unit can serve as a combination command and dispatch center, coupled with an area of the unit which wouM be available as a mobile office. /Wany other cities or jurisdictions currently have mobile command posts which are generally only used for thatpurpose. The construction of "our" unit would also allow for the vehicle to be utilized as a mobile substation. The design wouM allow Crime Prevention Officers to use the vehicle in neighborhoods, shopping centers, or at community functions (i.e.; Grape Harvest Festival) as a highly visible tool which directly takes the City's '?gublic safety message" to its citizens. The information regarding the specifications for the command center has been provided to the Purchasing Department (see attached), and we have been advised that they are ready to proceed with the bid process, pending City Council approval of the project. The cost of the command center and related equipment is expected to be approximately $100, 000 and will be fimded utilizing asset seizure monies. Pending your approval of the project, it is requested that the item be placed on the City Council ,4genda on the earliest possible date. RH/JH/ih ; t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 7, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, ACP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director CONSIDERATION OF RESOI,UT!ON NO. 97- *** SUPPORTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT FOR PD-85R RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution supporting the continuation of the annual assessment for the operation and maintenance of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks. BACKGROUND: PD-85R, includes Red Hill and Heritage Parks. PD-85 was formed July 1, 1985 by City Council action for the purpose of funding construction and maintenance and operation costs of Red Hill Park's 44 acres and Heritage Park's 40 acres. PD-85 is self-supporting in that all of the funds collected are used to retire the bonds used to construct the parks and for all annual operational and maintenance expenses at these parks. These assessments have been stable since 1993. Proposition 218 now requires the existing property owners to ratify the existing rates for maintenance through an election prior to July 1, 1997. The vote to ratify the existing maintenance portion of $31.00 of the total assessment amount of $52.00 per year per single family residence, will be before property owners on June 26, 1997. The approximate 25,000 property owners will be receiving a ballot in the mail with a detailed explanation of the ballot, the voting process, the dollar amounts involved, and the date to rerum the ballot. The majority of those ballots returned by property owners will determine if the annual operational funds can still be collected through the District to maintain these parks. The ballots will then be tabulated at the June 26, 1997 public hearing conducted by the City Council. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P-85R May 7, 1997 Page #2 CONCLUSION; It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution supporting the continuation of the annual assessment for the operation and maintenance of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks. Respect, fully sub~mitted, Ricx Gomez /~ Cor~rnum~ Devo~pment Director P. Cl/js Attachments: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 97-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORT NG THE CONTINUATION OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF RED HILL AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARKS (PD-85-R) WHEREAS, PD-85-R was formed on July 1, 1985 by City Council for the purpose of funding the construction and maintenance and operation costs of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park; and WHEREAS, PD-85-R is self-supporting in which all the funds collected are used to retire the bonds which helped to construct the community parks and support all annual operational and maintenance expenses incurred at the parks; and WHEREAS, Proposition 218 requires that the existing property owners ratify the existing rates for maintenance and operation of the parks prior to July 1, 1997; and WHEREAS, the vote to ratify the existing maintenance portion of $31.00 of the total assessment amount of $52.00 per year per single family residence will be before property owners on June 26, 1997; and WHEREAS, the majority of the ballots returned by property owners will determine the continuation of the existing assessment for the continued annual operation and maintenance services for Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City or Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves its support for the continuation of the assessment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park (PD-85-R). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 7, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Count4,1 Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CONSENT ORDINANCES For your information, Consent Ordinance Nos. 569, 570 and 571 are again on the agenda to repeat the second. The reason for this is because there was an error in the publication of the Ordinances after the second reading had occurred the first time. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.