The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001/09/19 - Agenda Packet - Agenda C~TY OF RANCHO.~CUCAMONGA -. '" - < , 10500 Civic €emler Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS r REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL ,-- REGULAR MEETINGS: 1ST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 Aaencv. Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander.................... Mayor Diane Williams............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane............................... Member Grace Curatalo......................... Member Bob Dutton.............................. Member Jack Lam......................... City Manager James L. Markman.............City Attorney Debra J. Adams..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting......Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting......................Council Chambers ~ City Council Agenda .' ,,' ,. i _ _ September 19, 2001 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander_, Curatalo _' Dutton Biane -' and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Certificates & Savings Bonds to the "2001 Earth Day Essay & Poster Contest Winners and Teachers." 2. Presentation of a Proclamation to the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution, recognizing "Constitution Week." 3. Presentation of Proclamation to Stater Bros. Markets in commemoration of their 65th Anniversary serving Southern California. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: July 10, 2001 (Special Meeting - Blane & Curatalo absent) August 30, 2001 (Special Meeting - Biane & Curatalo absent) September 5, 2001 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/29/01 and 9/5/01 and Payroll ending 8/26/01 for the total amount of $2,040,656.98. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31.2001. 1 17 ~ City Council Agenda . . September 19, 2001 2 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "FY 2001/2001 Bus Bay Improvements at Various Locations", to be funded from Account Nos. 11052085650/1238105-0 and 12143035650/ 1293214-0. 23 RESOLUTION NO. 01-201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FY 2001/2002 BYS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 26 5. Approval of Notice of Partiai Assignment of Development Agreement No. 00-02 from Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC to MBK Homes Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation, Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., a California Corporation, and Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., a Colorado Corporation. 31 6. Approval of Parcel Map 15651, located at the terminus of Rochester Court and on the west side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of 6th Street, submitted by Paragon Rochester, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. 46 RESOLUTION NO. 01-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15651 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15651) 49 7. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map No. 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway. 50 RESOLUTION NO. 01-203 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15492 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT 53 ~ ~ City Council Agenda September 19, 2001 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01-204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 TRACT MAP NUMBER 15492 54 8. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 & 6 for DR 00-59, located at the southwest corner of 8th Sl. and Rochester Ave., east of Buffalo Ave., submitted by Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 01-205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY DR 00-59 RESOLUTION NO. 01-206 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-59 61 64 65 9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 00-31, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street, submitted by Peter K. Vagenas and James Kefallinos. RESOLUTION NO. 01-207 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 00-31 RESOLUTION NO. 01-208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 00-31 73 76 77 ~ City Council Agenda T September 19, 2001 4 10. Approval to summarily vacate and authorize the signing of a Grant Deed for releasing the excess portions of Miller Avenue west of the intersection of 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue as required by Church Gardens -APN: 227-211-07, 28, and 43 (V-182) RESOLUTION NO. 01-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A GRANT DEED FOR RELEASING THE EXCESS PORTIONS OF MILLER AVENUE WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 1-15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (V-18) APN: 227-221-07, 28, AND 43 85 86 11. Approval of a request to summarily vacate the unpaved 7'h Street (20th Street) between Hermosa Avenue and Deer Creek Channel, V-181, by Paragon Development Corporation. 92 RESOLUTION NO. 01-210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF UNUSED 7TH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL 96 12. Approval to authorize the execution of Program Supplement No. 003-M to the Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420 (CO 01- 081) covering In-Roadway Warning Lights Installation at 19th Street and Jasper Street. 13. Approval to initiate formation proceedings for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 for Tracts 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 and 15902, located north of State Route 30 between Day Creek Channel and Hanley Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. 99 101 RESOLUTION NO. 01-211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS APPROVED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA 104 ~ City Council Agenda ./ September 19, 2001 5 CONSTITUTION; AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH RESOLUTION NO. 01-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT T THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF THE DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION RESOLUTION NO. 01-213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS 106 108 14. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 99-10, submitted by evergreen Devco, Inc., (Walgreen's), located n the southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets. 111 RESOLUTION NO. ~ 0\ - d. \ l:J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE F COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 113 fiiA l1@J City Council Agenda September 19, 2001 5 CONSTITUTION; AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH RESOLUTION NO. 01-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT T THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF THE DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION RESOLUTION NO. 01-213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS 106 108 14. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 99-10, submitted by evergreen Devco, Inc., (Walgreen's), located n the southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets. 111 RESOLUTION NO. 01-214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE F COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 113 ~' ',' i. . . T City Council Agenda September 19, 2001 6 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION - JOSEPH AND J. L. WALKER - An application to desiqnate the Krvsto Ranch House and propertv as a Historic Landmark and a request to file a Notice of Exemption under the CEQA Guidelines per Article 19, Section 15308, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 5, 2001) RESOLUTION NO. 01-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00369, DESIGNATING THE KRYSTO RANCH A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 201-152-15 114 146 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04 - HOGLE/IRELAND. INC - A request to amend the circulation element of the General Plan to eliminate a portion of 7'h Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17. 150 152 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC - A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Development District, Subarea 5 to eliminate a potion of 7'h Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17, 30, and 31. 152 --- ~" ,,' "/" . /" . . City Council Agenda September 19, 2001 7 RESOLUTION NO. 01-214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE ORDINANCE NO. 670 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 176 179 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE CITY'S E-GOVERNMENT PLAN (ORAL) 2. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY'S ANNUAL REPORT (ORAL) ~ City Council Agenda '.' '- T September 19, 2001 8 h COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE ON CABLE TELEVISION UPGRADE (ORAL) 2. PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 182 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 13, 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. July 10, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIUPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special/Adiourned MeetinQ A. CALL TO ORDER A special/adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, July 10, 2001 in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting convened at 7:05 p.m. Present were Council members: Bob Dutton (arrived at 7:20 p.m.), Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Planning Commissioners: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Pamela Stewart, Peter Tolstoy and Chairman Larry McNiel. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Brent LeCount, Associate Planner; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent were: Councilmembers Paul Biane and Grace Curatalo ****** B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF DRAFT MASTER PLAN FOR VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT - The detailed review of a master plan for a 2.3 million square foot open air mixed use mall development including retail, office, specialty commercial, restaurant, civic, and entertainment uses as well as approximately 600 multi-family dwelling units on 175 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the 1-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west and Foothill boulevard to the south - APN: 227-161-35,35, and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36: 227-211-24, 39, and 40 to 43. Related Files: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and General Plan Amendment 01-22. Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director, stated tonight the developer for the regional center wanted to give a presentation on the latest plan for this project. She stated the design review process would start in September. She stated they want to allow for the Council and Commission to give input, advice and guidance on the proposed plan. She introduced the President of Forest City Development, Brian Jones. Brian Jones, Forest City Development, stated they have looked all over the United States for ideas for the regional mall. He stated this mall would be the largest in the western United States. He talked about what would make this center special so that it would attract businesses to it. He stated after being at the ICSC conference, he feels they will get the tenants they want. He stated they hope to start construction in 2003 and open in 2004. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 Page 2 Frank Fuller, Field, Paoli Architects, talked about the design of the regional center. He stated they are trying to make it unique to Rancho Cucamonga. He continued to present the model of the mall. He also referred to the proposed mall master plan which was distributed to the Council and Commission and is on file in the City Clerk's office. He also referred to large drawings that were on display. ... Councilmember Dutton arrived at 7:20 p.m. The City Council was officially called to order at this time. ... David Bergston of SWA gave a power point presentation. He talked about the landscaping design proposed for the project. He commented on the water elements as well. Frank Fuller continued to talk about the plan. He taiked about the landmarks through the regional center and what they would do for the project. He stated all of the elements that have been talked about are in the draft master plan that the Council and Planning Commission have been given. ... A recess was taken at 7:45 p.m. for the Council only to convene on another item (see special meeting agenda of 7/10/01). The City Council and Planning Commission reconvened at 7:48 p.m. ... Brian Jones referred to the housing element and stated it is a very important part of the proposed center. He stated Forest City will manage the center to make sure it is a safe piace. He felt this center would be a regional draw. Councilmember Dutton asked what the timeframe is. Brian Jones stated they would break ground in 2003 and open in 2004. Mayor Alexander asked how the water element would work in the plan. Brian Jones stated the water would be put in various strategic locations. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about the phasing for the project. Brian Jones stated the first phase would include 800,000 square feet. He stated the second phase would start within approximately three years. Council member Dutton asked what would be included in the first phase. Brian Jones stated there would be 3 department stores consisting of 400,000 square feet and then there would be another 400,000 square feet of other retail stores including landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the residential part would start right away. Randall Lewis, Lewis Retail, stated it would start as quickly as the mall started. Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director, stated American Beauty wants to start their residential before the end of this year. Mayor Alexander asked about the possibility of a hotel. Brian Jones stated right now there are no definite plans, but that there is definitely some interest out there. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 Page 3 Commissioner McNiel asked if they have done an outdoor mall like this before. Brian Jones stated not like this particular one that is as large as this. He stated they have built outdoor malls about 25 years ago, but this is a breakthrough as far as its size. Frank Fuller talked about other outdoor malls and how successful they have been. Commissioner McNiel asked where they are in their calculations for parking. Brian Jones stated there are 4,500 stalls for 1.2 million square feet. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested they need to rethink their plan on compact parking spaces. Councilmember Williams stated she thinks everyone wants to be reassured that there are movie screens in the center. Brian Jones stated they have a mutual interest and felt they are very important to the center. Councilmember Williams wants people to feel safe in their own community through being at the center. Commissioner Tolstoy felt it should be a place where people can come and do other things other than just shop. He felt it should be a place where they can eat and gather as a family. He asked when the complete build-out would be. Colm Macken stated about 5 years. Commissioner Tolstoy wanted to make sure a variety of materials would be used on the exteriors of the buildings. He talked about Rodeo Drive II and how wonderful that is. David Bergston stated he felt there was already some of this planned for the regional center. Sandra Quilty asked if there would be on-street parking allowed. Frank Fuller stated yes. Sandra Quilty felt covered parking would be very important. She asked about public works, police and other emergency services for the center. Brian Jones stated all of the tenants pay to maintain the landscaping, streets, etc. Victor Grgas stated the City will have their own security as well as the mall security. Jim Pugh, City View, asked who would control all of the events that would take place at the regionai center. Brian Jones stated they would bring people in for the events and that all of the streets within the center are private. Commissioner Tolstoy talked about New Orleans and a parade he saw that was so great. Brian Jones stated he wishes they could have an event every week. Gino Filippi stated he is grateful to have been a part of the plan for the center and asked to have the City's heritage included in the plan, i.e. grape vineyards. City Council/Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 Page 4 Jim Frost asked what they are doing to keep everyone's views from being blocked. Frank Fulier felt that views would not be blocked. Adam Eventov, Press Enterprise, asked what they were doing for the Mom and Pop storeowners. Brian Jones stated they have talked about creating a pavilion where they would put in incubator retail for new businesses. He stated this is a program they would like to start here. '* '* * * * '* C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. ****** D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved by Planning Commission: September 12, 2001 Approved by City Council: . August 30, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special MeetinQ A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, August 30, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m.. Present were Councilmembers: Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III: Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer; Diane Whyte, Sr. Admin. Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent were Councilmembers: Paul Biane and Grace Curatalo. ****** B. ITEM OF BUSINESS 81. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPALLY OWNED UTILITY Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Councii were: Cheryl Karns-Avant, Regional Manager, Edison Company, read a statement into the record which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Bill Daneen, resident, wanted to know why this is so pressing. Mayor Alexander asked Mr. O'Neil to explain this. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the urgency is for the City to be in a position where they can take advantage of becoming a municipally owned utility should the opportunity arise. Mayor Alexander asked if there was legislation about cities becoming municipal utilities. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there is a possibility of a deadline being imposed and that is why the City wants to go ahead with this Resolution so they can have it in place if it becomes necessary. He stated the City is not going into the power business, but this allows the City to exercise all of its options if necessary. Councilmember Dutton inquired if by forming this would it give the City the capability to build its own power plant and then be able to provide power to the City's facilities. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated that is a possibility depending on what happens in Sacramento. City Council Minutes August 30, 2001 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CREATION AND OPERATION OF A MUNICIPALLY OWNED UTLlTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING VARIOUS UTILITY SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING THE TAKIG OF CERTAIN OTHER ACTION IN CONNECTION THEREWITH MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to approve Resolution No. 01-193. Motion carried unanimously 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). *1t**1t* C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. ****** D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: . September 5, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, September 5, 2001, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager: Craig Fox, Assistant Cit Attorney; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. ****** B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD NORTH AND SOUTH OF BANYAN AVENUE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD (APN: 0225-161-45, 0225-101-34 AND -42) OWNED BY INTEX PROPERTIES: NEGOTIATING PARTIES, WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, AND DAN JAMES, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER - INTEX PROPERTIES- CC ... The following emergency item was added by a unanimous 5-0 vote. ... B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, HILLSIDE SAPPHIRE VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PER GOVENRMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9- CC ****** C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS No one was present to comment on the closed session items. ****** D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:35 p.m. ****** City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 2 E. RECESS The Council adjourned at 6:45 p.m. No action was taken in closed session. ********************** CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ReQular MeetinQ A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, September 5, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney; Kevin McArdle: Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Shonda Bello, Planning Aide; Alan Brock, Plan Check Manager/Building; Bob Bowery, Information Systems Manager; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist: Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager: Joan Kruse, Contract Employee; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. ****** B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Chad Eyerly as the World Soap Box Derby Champion. Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, presented a certificate on behalf of Sheriff Gary Penrod. Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation to Chad Eyerly congratulating him on his accomplishment. Chad Eyerly wanted to thank his parents for their support and thank his Dad for helping with his car. He hoped to do this again next year and move up to the next division. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to the following Little League Divisions for the District 21 Championships: . 9-10 Division - Vineyard Little League . Major Division - Vineyard Little League . Junior Division - Alta Loma Little League . Senior Division - Alta Loma Little League . Big League - Rancho Cucamonga Little League City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 3 Mayor Alexander called Doug Morris to the front to help with the presentations. Certificates and a Proclamation were presented. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation to the following Little League Divisions for the Sectional 7 Championships: . Junior Division - Alta Loma Little League . Senior Division - Alta Loma Little League . Big League - Rancho Cucamonga Little League Mayor Alexander called Doug Morris to the front to assist with the presentations. Certificates and a Proclamation were presented. ****** C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Mrs. William Appel, 9640 Carrari, wanted to talk to the Council about the water that the community is drinking at their homes. She had samples to show the poor quality of the water showing it had a lot of sand in it. She had dirty water filters that the also displayed to the Council. She felt something should be done about the condition of the drinking water in the City. Mayor Alexander stated the City Manager should contact Bob DeLoche of CCWD about Mrs. Appel's concerns. He added he did not think it was possible to have water without some small amount of sand in it. C2. John Lyons, Etiwanda, stated he likes CCWD water better than any other water he drinks. He talked about the fire in Glacier National Park and felt the area was not being taken care of. ****** D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, requested item 16 be removed from the agenda and stated it would return at a future meeting. D1. Approval of Minutes: August 1, 2001 August 15, 2001 August 15, 2001 (Dutton absent) (Special Workshop) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/08/01 through 8/22/01 and Payroll ending 8/16/01 for the total amount of $6,366,409.84. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase I Utility Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4th Street to approximately 350 feet south of 8th Street, to be funded from RDA Account No. 26408015602. RESOLUTION NO. 01-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS FROM 4TH STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 350 SOUTH OF 8TH STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 4 D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Marine Avenue from Humboldt Avenue to 26th Street and 26th Street from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue, to be funded by AB 2928 Traffic Congestion Relief (Fund 128). RESOLUTION NO. 01-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MARINE AVENUE FROM HUMBOLDT AVENUE TO 26TH STREET AND 26TH STREET FROM CENTER AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Request for approval to appropriate funds received from the Children and Families Commission for San Bernardino County for a grant for year two funding in the amount of $230,601 for the continuation and expansion of the Youth Enrichment Services (YES) program. (Account No. 1-252-00-4740). D6. Approval of Street Banner Applications and Schedules for Calendar Year 2001/2002. D7. Approval of Voting Recommendations for League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions. D8. Approve Change Order No. 1 To Ch2mhill, Inc. for the preparation of a Project StUdy Report at Arrow Route and the 1-15 Freeway, and appropriate $91,000 from Fund Balance 1124, to Account No. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0. D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map No. 15278, located on the southwest corner of London Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by P.K.T. Properties, LLC RESOLUTION NO. 01-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15278 RESOLUTION NO. 01-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15278 D10. Approval Parcel Map 15579, located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Buffalo Avenue, submitted by the Price Company, a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 01-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15579 City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 5 D11. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Project and University Elementary School (CO 01-074) located at the northwest corner of Summit and Bluegrass (formerly Hanley) Avenues, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda, 685LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 01-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT AND THE UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS D12. Approval of and authorization to execute an agreement with J.D.C. Inc., of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (CO 01-075) for the Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Maintenance Agreement funded from Account 1-001-316-5300 in the amount of $250,000.00. D13. Approval to appropriate $73,794 from prior year's reserves into Account No. 1001302-5300 to fund contract Development Review Services to be provided by Employment Services Incorporated (CO 01-076). D14. Approval accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $172,755.00 ($157,050.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting (CO 01-077), for the Construction of Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive, to be funded from Transportation System Development and SB 325 funds, Account Nos. 11243035650/1253124-0 and 11803035650/1237180-0, and appropriate $43,000.00 to Account No. 11243035650/1253124-0 (Transportation Systems Development). D15. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $71,784.90 ($65,259.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Grigolla & Sons Construction Co., Inc. (CO 01-078), for Construction of the Access Ramp Improvements generally located on Hermosa and Lemon Avenue, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1150176-0. D16. Approval to purchase computer hardware and software for the Citywide Downstream Program upgrade and replacement, from Unitek Technology, Inc. (CO 01-079) as the lowest responsible bidder in the amount of $289,801.73 from account 1714001-5605 as approved in the FY 2001/2002 budget. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA. D17. Approval to accept the Almond Trail Drainage Improvements from Beryl Street to 1400 west, Contract No. 01-047 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the Final Contract amount of $104,528.82. RESOLUTION NO. 01-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ALMOND TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FROM BERYL STREET TO 1400 FEET WEST, CONTRACT NO. 01-047, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 6 D18. Approval to accept the Arrow Route Cross Gutter Removal and Drainage Improvements and Hellman Avenue Drainage Improvements, Contract No. 01-028 as complete, approval to appropriate $12,139.13 from Measure I Fund Balance to Account No. 11763035650/1264176-0, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the Final Contract amount of $134,391.33. RESOLUTION NO. 01-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARROW ROUTE CROSS GUTTER REMOVAL AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND HELLMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 01- 028 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item D16. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ****** E. CONSENT ORDINANCES E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00263 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request to amend a portion of the Victoria Community Plan from Medium and Medium High Residential (8-14 and 14-24 dwelling units per acre, respectively) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-691-01 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 668. ORDINANCE NO. 668 (second readingl AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00263, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM AND MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (8-14 AND14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, RESPECTIVELY) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 20.15 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-691-01 MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 668. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO FLOOD DAMAGE PROTECTION TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 669. City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 669 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 669. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ****** F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION - JOSEPH AND J. L. WALKER - An application to designate the Krysto Ranch House and property as a Historic Landmark and a request to file a Notice of Exemption under the CEQA Guidelines per Article 19, Section 15308, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. He added that staff has not received any correspondence in opposition to the designation. He also recognized Shonda Bello who had worked on this and stated she is leaving the City to go to school to study historic preservation. Council member Biane asked what is the benefit of making this a historic landmark designation. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated it is an honorary designation of the property to acknowledge that it has historical significance to the community. There are certain protections so that any exterior modifications for that landmark require Historic Preservation Commission review, which is an additional process to make modifications. It also allows them to apply for several things, I.e., a CUP for a low intensity commercial use which is defined as bed and breakfast stand, flower shop or that kind if thing with low activity. He stated granting a CUP is not a given thing either. He said the other benefit is you do quality to request the City Council grant a property tax reduction contract which is pretty typical in our community. He added this could reduce the property taxes by about 50%. Mayor Alexander stated some of the Council has received letters about what kind of activities are taking place at this location. He felt it should be looked at very carefully as to what kind of use is allowed at this location. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated he has talked to people with these same types of concerns. He stated he has told people if there is a code violation to let our Code Enforcement Division know. Councilmember Williams asked if an application is filed for a CUP would this go to the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yes. He stated if the owner does not like the decision, the matter could be appealable to the City Council. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Bob Pasma, 6009 Burgandy, stated he would like to state his position on this matter. He felt the owners want this to be an historic landmark for personal and business purposes, not for the purpose of preserving history in the City. He felt history is very important, but did not feel this building was something to be called an historic landmark. He felt the owners want to make this a commercial building. He felt a landmark designation should be declined. City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 8 Sheldon & Bonnie Clark, 6027 Burgandy, stated Mr. Pasma addressed their concerns very well. They told about meeting the Walker's and the plans they had for the house. Mrs. Clark stated after talking to them she realized what this would do to their neighborhood and that it concerns them. She felt this property has already been used for a wedding site. Lisa Cascadden stated she has also talked to the Walker's and was told they plan to use this as a wedding chapel and banquet facility. She stated she is concerned about the bridle trail possibly being closed. She stated she was concerned about traffic, trash, noise and foot traffic this would create for their neighborhood. Mrs. Nuzam, 9719 Manzanita, stated she does not have a problem with this being made an historic landmark, but did not agree with the CUP. She stated they had talked to a worker at the property and was told the backyard was going to be a parking lot for a bridal hall. Chris Warner, 5987 Burgandy, stated she was told the owners plan to make this property a wedding business. She asked that this not be approved. Bruce Perry, 9764 Golden, stated he has concerns and agrees with his neighbors. He felt it would probably get the designation, but that they have problems with the idea of the bridal business for this property. He asked that the CUP be denied. Craig Welch, 9715 Sun Flower, felt it was no longer historical because now it is a residence. He felt an environmental impact report should be done before they do anything with this. James Deagalara, stated he submitted a letter to the Planning Commission and wanted it to be part of the record. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated it is in the agenda packet, pages 178 - 180. Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney, stated it would be part of the record because it is part of the agenda packet. Mr. Deagalara stated the thrust of his input to the Council is that he feels the categorical exemption is wrong according to the law. He felt based on the knowledge, the testimony presented, of the intended use of this property to be a wedding banquet hall which would have traffic and noise, he felt it should be taken out of the realm of a categorical exemption. He felt even though they haven't made an actual application to develop a bridal hall, he felt because of the apparent forseeability, apparent knowledge that this will lead to a subsequent application, they should not do a categorical exemption. He felt the Planning staff has had conversations with the applicant and that they have stated their intentions to them. He felt it was unfortunate that the Walker's were not present tonight so they could be asked what they plan to do with the property. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Council member Williams asked if they could approve the landmark designation because of its value, but without the categorical exemption. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated it is the City Attorney's office that recommended it be done this way. Councilmember Williams asked if an EIR would be done. Larry Henderson, Principal Pianner, stated yes. City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 9 Councilmember Williams wanted to be sure that an EIR is done and that it is considered as part of the CUP. She felt anything more than a garage should require an EIR. Council member Dutton stated he opposes the historic landmark designation being used to get something approved for a commercial use. He said he could not approve the item tonight or wait until the Walker's are present to state what their intentions are. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed with Councilmember Dutton and felt the Walker's should know about the CEQA requirements. Councilmember Curatalo agreed with all of the people that were present and stated she shares their feelings and concerns. Councilmember Biane stated he was concerned about the two families living in this house. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated two families can co-habitate in one home. He stated staff does not know if they are violating building codes unless they are invited in to do an inspection. He stated they have heard from the owners a lot of possible uses they are considering for the property. He felt it would be a good idea to look at some of the properties that have alternative uses for historical structures and see if those have been relatively good neighbors. Councilmember Biane stated he would go on record that he opposes commercial use on this particular property . Councilmember Williams stated she agrees, but felt the owners should be present before a decision is made. She stated she would like to know if there are any business license applications for this property. Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney, asked the Mayor to reopen the hearing before the item is continued. Mayor Alexander opened the public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 01-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00369, DESIGNATING THE KRYSTO RANCH A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-152-15 MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing to September 19, 2001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ****** G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. ****** H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted. ****** City Council Minutes September 5, 2001 Page 10 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT DOBBIN LO TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to appoint Dobbin Lo. Motion carried unanimously 5- O. 12. INTRODUCTION TO THE CITY'S INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN (ORAL) Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced the item and turned the presentation over to Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, introduced the core team (City staff) for the project. She also introduced the DeLoitte Touche team (consultant) which would give a power point presentation. ACTION: Report received and filed. ......"'*** J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. ...*.. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC J1. Councilmember Williams wanted to be sure the cable boxes update would be on the next agenda. J2. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like information on the water issue brought up and felt it should be looked into. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they would do a memo to the Council about what staff finds out. ****** L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: . \ .-- ~ CITY OF RC HAS (PROD) 08/29/01 C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4,54 PM --req' CGONZALE--leg GL JL--loc, FINANCE---job, 51566 #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id CKREG- -- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs ReI To Note ========== ============ ============================= ======== ---------- ---- ---- ----------------------- ---------- ---- ---- ----------------------- AP00172718 004149 ACCESS RATING AND INFORMATION 08/29/01 277.02 MW OH AP00172719 004013 ACCESS TO FREEDOM 08/29/01 4,992.00 MW OH AP00172720 003785 ACTION ART 08/29/01 925.58 MW OH AP00172721 004156 ADVANTAGE PERFORMANCE DISTRIB 08/29/01 7.57 MW OH AP00172722 005509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 08/29/01 2,890.93 MW OH AP00172723 000496 ALEXANDER, WILLIAM J 08/29/01 52.09 MW OH AP00172724 000017 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 08/29/01 80.46 MW OH AP00172725 004153 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 08/29/01 23.80 MW OH AP00172726 003265 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 08/29/01 385.00 MW OH AP00172727 004146 AMERI NATIONAL 08/29/01 164.00 MW OH AP00172728 004146 AMERI NATIONAL 08/29/01 350.00 MW OH APa0172729 004146 AMERI NATIONAL 08/29/01 164.00 MW OH AP00172730 002283 AMS PLANNING RESEARCH CORP 08/29/01 4,300.00 MW OH AP00172731 002341 ARCHIBALD FLOWERS 08/29/01 236.80 MW OH AP00172732 004160 ARCO STEEL INC 08/29/01 46.00 MW OH AP00172733 001291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 08/29/01 472 . 00 MW OH AP00172734 004165 ARMENDARIZ, SEAN 08/29/01 70.00 MW OH AP00172735 000667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 08/29/01 1,498.48 MW OH AP00172736 004151 B AND F FINANCIAL AND MANAGEM 08/29/01 5.00 MW OH AP00172737 004166 BABB, TAMARA 08/29/01 40.00 MW OH AP00172738 004754 BADGE A MINIT 08/29/01 149.95 MW OH AP00172739 004161 BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER INC 08/29/01 23.00 MW OH AP00172740 004159 BEAUTYFIRST 08/29/01 23.01 MW OH AP00172741 004163 BERKHOEL, RENEE 08/29/01 16.50 MW OH AP00172742 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 08/29/01 172.68 MW OH h C H E C K REG 1ST E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 51566 #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id 08/29/01 req: CGONZALE--leg .. CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) WED, AVG 29, 2001, 4:54 PM Page 2 CKREGu - ReI To Note ===================================== Check Amount Type Subs ------ --- -- ------ --- -- 252.29 MW OH Date 08/29/01 Payee Name -------- ------- BLAZING ID =r==== Payee 004162 004143 Check APOOl72743 AP00172744 ----- STEEL INC INDUSTRIAL OH OH MW MW 00 600.00 245 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 ELLW ASSOCIATES BRICKSON BUCKHAVE, BURNS INTERNATIONAL MIKE AND 004145 APOOl72745 OH MW 05 6,343 SECURITY 004410 APOOl72746 OH MW 51. 79 08/29/01 INDUSTRIES C E 004157 AP00172747 08/29/01 CAGLES APPLIANCE 005156 AP00172748 OH MW 677 . 63 OH OH MW MW 00 17.20 1,310 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 #643 OF eMS CARLS JR RESTAURANT CERTIFIED AUTO CARE CARE AP00172749 004144 004154 APOOl72750 OH MW 1,390.65 AP00172751 000266 OH MW 1.77.38 08/29/01 GOODS INC CHICKS SPORTING 000713 APOOl72752 OH MW 77.36 08/29/01 INC CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO AP00172753 000073 OH MW 50 282 08/29/01 CITY RENTALS 000074 APOOl72754 OH MW 23.50 08/29/01 13 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT 022139 AP00172755 OH MW 3,239.00 08/29/01 SOLUTIONS CLASS SOFTWARE 004537 APOOl72756 OH MW 13,261. 83 08/29/01 CLASSIC STITCH EMBROIDERY CO 006197 AP00172757 OH MW 328.35 08/29/01 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 006215 APOOl72758 OH MW 00 30,988 08/29/01 INC COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES AP00172759 006464 OH MW 552 . 12 11 08/29/01 COMPUTER SERVICE CO AP00172760 000130 OH MW 40.00 08/29/01 DAN COPP CRUSHING 006709 APOOl72761 OH MW 00 140 08/29/01 CPRS AP00172762 001437 OH MW 281. 88 08/29/01 HEIGHTS CRESCENT 004148 APOOl72763 Void OH OH VM MW 0.00 53,886.66 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 Continued Stub CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST D AND Void COlITINU AP00172765 000085 APOOl72 764 VOID OH OH MW MW 4,039.17 92,403.00 08/29/01 K CONCRETE COMPANY DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES AP00172766 000239 000105 APOOl72767 ~ CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4 CHECK REGISTER #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id C H E C K REG I S T E R GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 51566 08/29/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg Page 3 CKREG- -- To Note Check Amount Type Subs ReI ------------- -- -- ------------- -- -- 91.78 MW OH Date 08/29/01 54 PM Check Payee 1D Payee Name =====: ============ ======================- AP00172768 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO -=============================== OH MW 52.64 08/29/01 INC DAY TIMERS 000347 APOOl72769 OH MW 980.95 08/29/01 INC DEMeo 004366 AP00172770 OH MW 256.23 08/29/01 DETCO AP00172771 a00107 OH MW 55.00 08/29/01 KRISTINA DIAZ AP00172772 004167 OH MW 1,992.00 08/29/01 TOM DINELEY AP00172773 005968 OH MW 11,430.00 08/29/01 LANDSCAPE SERVICES DMS AP00172774 003307 OH MW 600.00 3 08/29/01 INC E G N CONSTRUCTION AP00172775 003297 OH MW 924.07 08/29/01 GRAPHICS EIGHTH AVENUE 003364 AP00172776 OH MW 63.00 08/29/01 EL CHICANO 006444 AP00172777 OH MW 134.00 2 08/29/01 FLOOR COVERING EMPIRE 005937 AP00172778 OH MW 634.55 1 08/29/01 SERVICE EMPIRE MOBILE HOME 005137 AP00172779 OH MW 22,856.57 08/29/01 INC EPIXTECH AP00172780 004436 OH MW 63,980.35 08/29/01 ESGIL CORPORATION AP00172781 002349 OH MW 122.35 08/29/01 IRRIGATION PRODUCTS EWING AP00172782 000229 OH MW 61 94 08/29/01 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES AP00172783 004914 08/29/01 FASTENAL COMPANY AP00172784 005917 OH MW 373.37 OH MW 182.85 08/29/01 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP00172785 000123 OH MW 3 50.62 3 08/29/01 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES AP00172786 006556 OH MW 795.00 08/29/01 FLUORESCO LIGHTING AP00172787 006440 OH MW 390.00 08/29/01 FOOTHILL SELF STORAGE AP00172788 002485 OH MW 243.04 08/29/01 THE GALE GROUP AP00172789 004540 OH MW 300.00 08/29/01 GUSTAVO GIL AP00172790 003357 OH OH MW MW 52 1,124.25 299 08/29/01 08/29/01 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING ww GRAINGER AP00172791 005955 AP00172792 000650 'w C H E C K REG I S T E R GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 51566 08/29/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4: Page 4 CKREG--- CHECK REGISTER #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id Payee 10 Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs ReI To Note ~=========== ============================= ======== ============= ==== == ====== 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 08/29/01 45.15 MW OH 54 PM Check ---------- ---------- APOOl72793 OH MW 771.46 22.00 08/29/01 08/29/01 BEVERAGE COMPANY HARALAMBOS HERNANDEZ 005699 AP00172794 OH MW MICHAEL 004106 APOOl72795 08/29/01 INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 000158 AP00172796 OH MW 3,631.40 OH MW 447.46 08/29/01 IBM CORPORATION AP00172797 004254 OH MW 864.00 08/29/01 INFANT FAMILY SERVICES PROGRA 006689 AP00172798 in Check DB Payee Name different OH OH MW MW 77 .40 1,250.00 430.00 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 LAW OFFICES SUPPLY AND MAYER AND JOHNSTONE JONES KLAUS 002386 005283 AP00172799 APOOl72800 OH MW SONS AP00172801 005295 OH MW 425.00 08/29/01 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION AP00172802 004982 OH OH MW MW os 190.00 118,981. 53 24,678 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 CONSTRUCTION CO JARRED LAMPE LANDSCAPE LAIRD 000193 AP00172804 001664 APOOl72803 OH MW INC WEST 000321 APOOl72805 OH MW 110.00 08/29/01 PRODUCTIONS LITTLE BEAR 005274 APOOl72806 OH MW 30.00 08/29/01 SHERYL LIZASUAIN AP00172807 004112 OH MW 39.10 08/29/01 LONGS DRUGS 001455 APOOl72808 OH MW 352.07 08/29/01 BTL CO COLA ANGELES COCA LOS 005662 APOOl72809 OH MW 2.374.08 08/29/01 INC LOWE'S COMPANIES AP00172810 001008 OH MW 75.00 08/29/01 CHANH LY AP00172811 004117 OH MW 610.03 08/29/01 WORLDCOM I M C OH MW 24.00 - 08/29/01 MARIA OH MW 84.84 08/29/01 INC OH MW 53.00 08/29/01 AR OH OH MW MW 250.00 100.00 08/29/01 08/29/01 IRA CARNIE MASTERS 001062 APOOl72812 AP00172813 004115 AP00172814 000072 AP00172815 004727 003665 AP00172817 004120 .J:::. APOOl72 816 08/29/01 --req CGONZALE--leg CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4: Page 5 CKREG-- - C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 51566 #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id To Note ReI Check Amount Type Subs ------------- ---- ---- ------------- ---- ---- 22.00 MW OH Date 08/29/01 54 PM Payee Name ------ -- ------ -- MATNEY JAN ID Payee 004107 Check ---------- ---------- AP00172818 ---------------- --------------- ============== OH MW 58 59 08/29/01 HARDWARE MATT'S 003871 AP00172819 OH OH MW MW 64 413.25 354 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 3019 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART MICROAGE COMPUTERMART INC MICHAELS STORES 002198 006170 AP001?2820 AP00172821 OH MW 1,833.39 006214 APOOI72822 OH MW 906.55 08/29/01 MIDWEST TAPE 005852 APOOI72823 OH MW 1,033.34 08/29/01 INC ELEC COMMUN AND MOTOROLA 001171 APOOI72824 OH MW 60 303 08/29/01 MIRRa AND MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS 001020 AP00172825 OH MW 13.85 08/29/01 WHITE BARBARA N M A DUES C/O 001332 APOOI72826 OH MW 105.95 08/29/01 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 032343 APOOI72827 OH MW 03 24,863 08/29/01 NATIONAL DEFERRED 000744 AP00172828 OH MW 139.00 08/29/01 NOTARY ASSOCIATION NATIONAL AP00172829 000593 OH MW 460.17 08/29/01 OFFICE DEPOT AP00172830 000523 Payee Name different in Check DB OH MW 2,340.13 08/29/01 HARDWARE SUPPLY ORCHARD AP00172831 005461 OH MW 00 370 08/29/01 OTT, LAURA 004904 AP00172832 OH MW 1,233.40 08/29/01 OWEN ELECTRIC 000235 AP001?2833 OH MW 391. 52 08/29/01 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES AP00172834 005343 OH MW 57 148 08/29/01 INC PARTSMASTER 005409 AP00172835 OH MW 00 300 08/29/01 SHANE PAYNTER 004104 AP00172836 OH MW 864.20 08/29/01 PETERMAN LUMBER AP00172837 006205 OH MW 1,755.58 08/29/01 SERVICE ROAD PETES 004267 APOOI72838 OH MW 472.15 08/29/01 LOST KINGDOM PHAROAHS 030812 AP00172839 OH MW 1,325.00 08/29/01 POWER PLUS AP00172840 003775 OH OH MW MW 78,072.75 15.40 08/29/01 08/29/01 PRINCIPAL LIFE OVERALL SUPPLY PRUDENTIAL 003286 AP00172842 000065 ~ AP00172841 C H E C K REG I S T E R GL JL--Ioc, FlNANCE---job, 51566 08/29/01 CGONZALE - -1 eg IFAS (PROD) 2001 4: CITY OF RC WED AUG 29 Page 6 CKREGu - ------ ------ CHECK REGISTER #S043-----prog: CK20Q <1.37>--report id To Note ReI Type Sub B --. -- --, -- MW OH Check Amount ============== 81.61 OH OH MW MW 475.00 10.97 Date ======== 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 - - req 54 PM RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RANCHO MINI STORAGE RANCHO MOBILE RANCHO SCREEN Payee ID Payee Name ============ ============================= 000264 Check ---------- ---------- AP00172B43 & SERVICE AUTO AP00172844 000207 AP00172845 004122 OH MW 79.01 EMERa PRINT AND AP00172846 006058 OH OH OH MW MW MW 80.00 30.37 300.00 300.00 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 GLENN BOARDWEAR ENTERTAINMENT ENTERTAINMENT RAPOZA RED E RHYTHM 004123 004124 006518 APOOl72847 APOOl72848 APOOl72849 OH MW RHYTHM 006518 AP00172850 OH MW 84.59 08/29/01 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 000276 AP001728S1 OH MW 24.00 08/29/01 MONICA ROGERS 003341 APOOl72852 OH OH MW MW 180.00 000.00 46.00 2 08/29/01 08/29/01 08/29/01 S C ACE 0 SANBAG SANTANA AP00172853 004438 AP00172854 004125 OH MW LUCY 003233 APOOl72855 OH MW 25.00 08/29/01 SCWMF AP00172856 000253 OH MW 252.00 08/29/01 CAL SENECHAL 003896 AP00172857 OH MW 56.44 08/29/01 SIR SPEEDY 000692 APOOl72858 OH MW 855.00 2 08/29/01 SLJ AUDIO SERVICES 003283 AP00172859 OH MW 1,368.09 78.35 08/29/01 08/29/01 SMART AND FINAL S FORKLIFT 001327 APOOl72860 OH MW RON SERVICE SMITH AP00172861 004126 OH MW 22.00 08/29/01 ERIC SNEDAKER AP00172862 004129 OH MW 606.39 08/29/01 GAS COMPANY SO CALIF SORRELL, 000319 APOOl72863 OH MW 340.00 08/29/01 JODI AP00172864 012532 Void OH VM 0.00 08/29/01 Continued Stub VOID.CONTlNU Void APOOl72865 Void Void OH OH VM VM 0.00 0.00 08/29/01 08/29/01 Continued Stub Continued Stub Void VOID.CONTlNU Void VOID. CONTlNU APOOl72866 APOOl72867 ~ 08/29/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4 Page 7 CKREG- n C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 51566 #S043-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id 54 PM --------- -------- To Note ReI Type Subs -- -- -- -- MW OH Check Amount ------------- ------------- 7,740.52 Date ------- ------- 08/29/01 08/29/01 Payee Name ------ ------ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPORT CHALET TEAM DIVISION ID Payee 001432 Check AP00172868 OH MW MW 96 22 004284 APOO1.72869 OH 2,700.00 08/29/01 STAGE SYSTEMS 004015 AP00172870 OH MW MW 02 145 08/29/01 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE AP00172871 004132 OH 84.00 08/29/01 SENINAR STREET TREE AP00172872 003607 OH MW 27.00 08/29/01 THIEM MECH CO INC I T.M.C 004133 APODl72873 OH MW 294.43 08/29/01 TARGET AP00172874 002344 OH MW 26.40 08/29/01 IN TAYLOR CONTRACTING SERVICE AP00172875 004134 OH MW 88 37 08/29/01 TCM LLC AP00172876 002234 OH MW 60.00 08/29/01 RHONDA TOWNSEND-SCHANTZ AP00172877 004136 OH MW 60.00 08/29/01 LOURDES TRAVAREZ AP00172878 004135 OH MW 15.00 08/29/01 TURF FEED CO AP00172879 004137 OH MW 4.000.00 08/29/01 PARCEL SERVICE UNITED AP00172880 001226 OH MW 64.53 08/29/01 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE AP00172881 001226 OH MW 955.68 08/29/01 INC UNITEK TECHNOLOGY AP00172882 006004 Void OH VM 0.00 08/29/01 Continued Stub VOID.CONTlNU Void AP00172883 Payee Name different in Check DB OH MW 877.20 5 08/29/01 CALIFORNIA VERIZON AP00172S84 000137 Void OH VM 0.00 08/29/01 Continued stub VOID.CONTlNU Void AP00172885 Void OH VM 0.00 08/29/01 Continued stub Void VOID.CONTlNU AP00172886 OH MW 4,096.59 08/29/01 VERIZON WIRELESS AP00172887 006661 OH MW 876.86 08/29/01 ARV ASSISTED DEL REY VILLA 004138 AP00172888 OH MW 65.00 08/29/01 SHERRYE WALLACE AP00172889 004140 OH MW 266.26 08/29/01 MANAGEMENT WASTE AP00172890 004002 OH OH MW MW 28.31 18.28 08/29/01 08/29/01 WEST END DRAPERY SERVICE SUPPLY WEST END MATERIAL AP00172891 004141 AP00172892 006181 ....,J CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 08/29/01 C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, AUG 29, 2001, 4:54 PM --req: CGONZALEhleg GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 51566 #S043-----prog: CK200 <1..37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs ReI To Note ========== ============ ============================= ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ======================= APOO172893 001809 I WESTERN CHAPTER ISA 08/29/01 75.00 MW OH GRAND TOT A L S: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 7 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Machine Written 666,845.34 Number of Checks Processed 169 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 GRAND TOT A L 666,845.34 cO 09/05/01 req: CGONZALE--leg CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) WED, SEP 05 2001, 3,49 Page 1 CKREG -- - C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id To Note ------------------------ ------------------------- Amount Type Subs ReI Check Date ------- ------- 09/05/01 Payee Name ----------------------------- ----------------------------- A AND A AUTOMOTIVE PM ID Check Payee ---------- ----- ---------- ----- APQ0172967 006451 OH MW 91.65 OH MW 687.25 09/05/01 INC RENTALS CO EQUIPMENT AA APQ0172968 000001 OH MW 36.64 09/05/01 CO EQUIPMENT RENTALS AA 090100 AP00172969 OH MW 100.00 09/05/01 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES AP00172970 006271 OH OH MW MW 508.56 297.60 2 09/05/01 09/05/01 09/05/01 ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLETRONICS ACTION BUSINESS 002732 AP00172972 000007 AP00172973 000013 AP00172971 OH MW 145.46 MACHINES OH MW 1,184.00 09/05/01 RONALD ADAMSON AP00172974 006309 OH MW 3,135.00 09/05/01 INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING AP00172975 005231 OH MW 88.70 09/05/01 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 005509 APOOl72976 OH MW 60.89 09/05/01 CORPORATI AMERICA AIR LIQUIDE 021700 APOOl72977 OH MW 20.00 09/05/01 SAMIR ALI AP00172978 004212 OH MW 65.27 09/05/01 ALPHAGRAPHICS AP00172979 000973 OH MW 700.00 3 09/05/01 PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC ALTA LOMA 005650 APOOl72980 OH MW 340.00 09/05/01 NATIONAL AMERI 004146 AP00172981 OH MW 866.23 3 09/05/01 INC AMS AP00172982 005206 OH MW 1.526.14 09/05/01 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AP00172983 002693 OH MW 00 14 09/05/01 ANNABELLE AQUINO AP00172984 004209 OH MW 341. 85 09/05/01 INC NURSERY ARBOR 000024 APOOl72985 Payee Name different in Check DB OH MW 00 354 09/05/01 ARCH WIRELESS AP00172986 001823 OH MW 1,152.00 09/05/01 DES IGN GROUP ARCH I TERRA 005807 APOOl72987 OH MW 1,070.00 09/05/01 SECURITY ASSI 006255 APOOl72988 OH MW 6,795.00 09/05/01 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 000026 AP00172989 OH OH MW MW 599.84 319.02 09/05/01 09/05/01 INC ASSOCIATED POWER AW DIRECT 001402 AP00172991 005347 APOOl72990 ~ 09/05/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg OF RC IFAS (PROD) SEP 05 2001 3,49 CITY WED: Page 2 CKREG - -- id 37>--report C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1 To Note Type Subs ReI OH Check Amount ------------- ------------- 147.25 Date ------- ------- 09/05/01 PM Payee ID Payee Name ------------ ---- ---- ------------ ---- ---- 004215 AZAM SHAISTA Check ---------- ---------- AP00172992 --------------------------- --------------------------- MW OH MW 00 114 09/05/01 INC BEACHLER ENTERPRISES 004202 APOOl72993 OH MW 100.00 09/05/01 PAUL BlANE 004454 AP00172994 OH MW .40 1,238 09/05/01 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 001746 AP00172995 OH MW 27.00 09/05/01 MARGIE BORDNER 004699 AP00172996 OH MW 125.00 09/05/01 ELIZA BOYMOUSHAKIAN 004204 APOOl72997 OH MW 133.00 09/05/01 JENNA BRAWLEY 004210 AP00172998 OH MW 70.73 09/05/01 INGRID BRUCE 002209 AP00172999 OH MW 946.73 09/05/01 CALSENSE 001223 AP00173000 OH MW 00 36 09/05/01 CASHIER CDFA AP00173001 004203 OR MW 44.52 09/05/01 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 000947 AP00173002 OR MW 94.00 09/05/01 CRISTINA CHERTKOW 004213 AP00173003 OH MW 51 506 09/05/01 CITY RENTALS 000074 AP00173004 OH MW 12,880.00 09/05/01 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 003140 APOOl73005 OH MW 100.00 09/05/01 DEBORAH CLARK 004279 AP00173006 OH MW 171,355.00 09/05/01 CLARY CORPORATION 002841 AP00173007 OH MW 00 65 09/05/01 JANICE CLAYTON 004654 AP00173008 OR MW 90.50 09/05/01 MINDY CONN 004216 AP00173009 OH MW 047.07 6 09/05/01 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 000085 AP00173010 OR MW 2.323.68 09/05/01 K CONCRETE COMPANY AND D 000239 AP00173011 OH MW 309.49 09/05/01 DAPPER TIRE CO 00247S AP00173012 Payee Name different in Check DB OH MW 52.50 09/05/01 CARE CENTER DEER CREEK CAR 001290 AP00173013 OH MW 300.00 09/05/01 DOUGLAS DILL AP00173014 003355 OH OH MW MW 25.00 100.00 09/05/01 09/05/01 DISTRICT XI aOB DUTTON 004219 005889 AP00173015 AP00173016 - \) 09/05/01 --req' CGONZALE--leg IFAS (PROD) 2001 3,49 PM CIT>: OF RC WED SEP 05 Page 3 CKREG- -- To Note -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- 37>--report id C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1 Amount Type Subs ReI Check Payee Name Date ----------------------------- ------- ----------------------------- ------- EARTHWORKS 09/05/01 ID Payee 003131 Check ---------- ---------- AP00173017 OH MW 00 462 OH MW 3,000.00 09/05/01 KODAK CO EASTMAN 000439 AP00173018 OH MW 78 595 09/05/01 INC EPIXTECH AP00173019 004436 OH MW 00 540 1 09/05/01 SCHOOL DISTRICT ETIWANDA 003806 AP00173020 OH MW 00 65 09/05/01 SANDRA FATLAND AP00173021 004817 OH MW 8,283.70 09/05/01 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 006556 AP00173022 OH MW 55.00 09/05/01 MARIELLA FLORES 004191 AP001?3023 OH MW 50 90 09/05/01 GINA FRESCAS 004187 AP00173024 OH MW 50 3 09/05/01 JACQUELINE FUENTES 004190 AP00173025 OH MW 63 368 09/05/01 GALE GROUP,THE 004540 AP00173026 OH MW 23.75 09/05/01 VIVIAN GARCIA AP00173027 003356 OH MW 00 65 09/05/01 RITA GRANT AP0017302B 004014 OH MW 67 255 09/05/01 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 003827 APOD173029 OH MW 2,937.46 09/05/01 GUARDIAN AP00173030 004486 OH MW 54 612 09/05/01 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 005699 AP00173031 OH MW 00 1,000 09/05/01 R E INC HARRINGTON 001855 AP00173032 OH MW 02 30 09/05/01 CHRISTOPHER HARRIS 004173 AP00173033 09/05/01 JAMES T HARRIS 005129 AP00173034 OH MW 00 350 OH MW 90 739 09/05/01 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 000462 AP00173035 OH MW 1,000.00 09/05/01 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH AP00173036 004845 OH MW 35 18,176 09/05/01 HOLIDAY PRINTING 004150 APOOl73037 OH MW 37 1,829 09/05/01 INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 000158 AP00173038 OH MW 00 1,200 09/05/01 INC HOME SAFE 004172 AP00173039 OH OH MW MW 50 10,147.46 85 09/05/01 09/05/01 AN JANET HOPPERS DRAFTING FURNITURE HONAKER 032384 AP00173041 001377 AP00173040 - - 09/05/01 --reg: CGONZALE--leg IFAS (PROD) 2001 3:49 CITi' OF RC WED, SEP 05 Page 4 CKREG- -- Check Amount Type Subs ReI To Note ====== ====================================== 37>--report id E R CHECK REGISTER 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1 C H E C K REG I S T GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: Payee Name Date ----------------------------- ------- ----------------------------- ------- HURST KIMBERLY 09/05/01 PM ID Payee 004180 Check ---------- ---------- AP00173042 OH MW 133.00 OH MW 906.45 09/05/01 INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 000495 AP00173043 OH MW 85 169 09/05/01 ID BURR 004188 APOOl73044 OH MW .58 2,806 09/05/01 INSIGHT 090925 AP00173045 OH MW 989.22 09/05/01 TECH INTELLI AP00173046 002432 OH MW 173.99 09/05/01 BATTERIES INTERSTATE 090933 AP00173047 OH MW 150.00 09/05/01 AND SAND INTRAVAIA ROCK AP00173048 003452 OH MW 23,617.00 09/05/01 INC INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS 002507 AP00173049 OH MW 299.99 09/05/01 IRON AGE CORPORATION 001471 AP00173050 OH MW 167.43 09/05/01 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY AP001730S1 002386 OH MW 7.00 09/05/01 STEPHANIE JOSEPH 000459 AP00173052 OH MW 179.63 09/05/01 KAPCO 005654 AP00173053 OH MW 02 64 09/05/01 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 002220 APOOl73054 OH MW 86 118 09/05/01 DONNA KENDRENA 002867 AP00173055 OH MW 660.00 09/05/01 JOAN A KRUSE 006516 AP00173056 OH MW 30 870 09/05/01 INN QUINTA LA 004199 AP00173057 OH MW 193.40 09/05/01 INN QUINTA LA AP00173058 004199 OH MW 696.67 09/05/01 INC LAIDLAW TRANSIT 004242 AP00173059 MW 00 24,255 09/05/01 CONSTRUCTION CO LAIRD AP00173060 000193 OH OH MW 100.00 09/05/01 09/05/01 09/05/01 JACK LAM, LAMPE LANDSCAPE 002633 AP00173061 OH MW 00 370 JARRED AP00173062 001664 OH MW 4,830.74 INC WEST 000321 AP00173063 OH MW 156.95 09/05/01 LIL STITCH 001005 AP00173064 OH OH MW MW 12,139.68 830.00 1 09/05/01 09/05/01 CORPORATION LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS LILBURN 005884 005274 AP00173065 AP00173066 - N Page 5 CKREG -- - 37>--report id C H E C K REG 1ST E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1 09/05/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg PM IFAS (PROD) 2001 3:49 CITY. OF RC WED SEP 05 To Note Type Subs Rel Amount Check Date ------- ------- 09/05/01 Payee Name ID Check Payee ----- ----- ----- ----- AP00173067 002587 ========================== OH MW 280.00 1 GEORGE LUTTERMAN OH MW 47.00 09/05/01 TIFFANY LY AP00173068 004181 OH MW 92 1,155 09/05/01 WORLDCOM I M C AP00173069 001062 OH MW 49.50 09/05/01 ANN-MARIE MAMARIL AP00173070 003925 OH MW 478.50 09/05/01 INN AT RIV MARRIOTT RESIDENCE AP00173071 004174 OH MW 00 53 09/05/01 MARSHALL PLUMBING 004727 AP00173072 Payee Name different in Check DB OH MW 00 45 09/05/01 UNION SERVICE MARTINEZ 000250 AP00173073 OH MW 94 116 09/05/01 MDS CONSULTING 003360 AP00173074 OH MW 00 1,370 09/05/01 MERANT AP00173075 006752 OH MW 13 618 09/05/01 3019 INC MICHAELS STORES 002198 AP00173076 OH MW 31 950 09/05/01 MICROSOFT TECHNET 006730 AP00173077 OH MW 560.77 09/05/01 MIDWEST TAPE 005852 AP00173078 OH MW 00 663 09/05/01 COMPANY MIJAC ALARM 000749 AP00173079 OH MW 61 1,068 09/05/01 INC MOBILE MINI 003860 AP00173080 OH MW 84 269 09/05/01 INC MOBILE STORAGE GROUP AP00173081 004374 OH MW 187.00 09/05/01 MARGIE MOLINO AP00173082 004183 OH MW 17 5 09/05/01 MELISSA MORALES 007183 AP00173083 OH MW 14.00 09/05/01 LAURA MORRILL 004184 AP00173084 OH MW 56.62 09/05/01 PATRICIA MORRISON AP00173085 005488 OH MW 140.00 09/05/01 LANI MUEGO 004185 AP00173086 OH MW 744.93 09/05/01 NAPA AUTO PARTS 00224S AP00173087 OH MW 25.00 09/05/01 FOUNDATION NATIONAL ARBOR DAY AP00173088 002545 OH MW 115 . 58 09/05/01 RENT NATIONS 006687 AP00173089 OH OH MW MW 00 60.05 3,000 09/05/01 09/05/01 NORRIS REPKE INC INC OCLC 000712 004853 AP00173090 APOOI73091 <:1 Page 6 CKREG - -- 09/05/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg C H E C K REG 1ST E R CHECK REGISTER GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 52284 #S048-----prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id To Note ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ReI Check Amount Type Subs ------------- ---- -- ------------- ---- -- 5.779.05 MW OH PM Payee Name Date ----------------------------- -------- ----------------------------- -------- OFFICE DEPOT 09/05/01 IFAS (PROD) 2001 3,49 ID Payee 000523 CIT\: OF RC WED, SEP 05 Check ---------- ---------- AP00173092 OH MW 75.80 09/05/01 ORIENTAL TRADING 001824 AP00173093 OH MW 213 . 90 09/05/01 OWEN ELECTRIC 000235 APOOl73094 OH MW 4--;433.41 09/05/01 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 005343 AP0017309S OH MW 90 139 09/05/01 INC PAPER DIRECT 004223 AP00173096 OH MW 29 12,071 09/05/01 AND PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUADE AP00173097 006755 OH MW 10 308 09/05/01 INC PARTSMASTER AP00173098 005409 OH MW 00 4,000 09/05/01 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENAN AP00173099 002821 OH MW 769.48 09/05/01 LUMBER PETERMAN AP00173100 006205 OH MW 40 1.340 09/05/01 SERVICE PETES ROAD 004267 AP00173101 OH MW 85 91 09/05/01 KAWASAKI POMONA VALLEY 001049 AP00173102 OH MW 00 28 09/05/01 SHANNON POWELL 031986 AP00173103 OH MW 700.00 09/05/01 INC SYSTEMS QUADRANT 002176 AP00173104 OH MW 1,575.85 09/05/01 CO POWERPLAN R D 0 EQUIPMENT AP00173105 000345 OH MW 360.00 2 09/05/01 INC R J M DESIGN GROUP 001038 AP00173106 OH MW 81 1,869 09/05/01 CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL REXEL 005914 AP00173107 OH MW 00 8,880 09/05/01 CONSULTING RHI 000443 AP00173108 OH MW 14.418.49 09/05/01 GERSHON AND RICHARDS WATSON 005618 AP00173109 OH MW 00 58 09/05/01 RAUL P ROBLES SR 000626 AP00173110 OH MW 41.58 09/05/01 ROTARY CORPORATION AP00173111 000016 OH MW 50 3 09/05/01 DAVID RYAN 004193 AP00173112 OH OH MW MW 508.37 624.00 19,625.00 09/05/01 COUNTY ASSESSORS OFF 09/05/01 COUNTY 09/05/01 IMAGES BERN BERN SAFETY SAN SAN 003756 001298 AP00173113 AP00173114 Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB OH OH MW MW 50 373 23 09/05/01 BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN 000150 AP00173116 005338 - ~ AP00173115 09/05/01 --req: CGONZALE--leg IFAS (PROD) 2001 3:49 CITy:. OF RC WED SEP 05 Page 7 CKREG--- Rei To Note -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- 37>--report id REGISTER CK200 <1 E R CHECK 52284 #S048-----prog Check Amount Type Subs ------------- --. -- ------------- --. -- 2,347.80 MW OH C H E C K REG I S T GL JL--loc: FlNANCE---job: Date -------- -------- 09/05/01 Name ----------------------- ----------------------- DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC PM Payee ID Check Payee ---------- ----- ---------- ----- APOOl7311? 000132 SAN OH MW 00 1,824 09/05/01 SCMAF AP00173118 031120 OH MW 126.00 09/05/01 PHYLLIS SCOTT 011780 AP00173119 OH MW 4,266.30 09/05/01 INC SYSTEM SEAL FURNITURE AND 001105 AP00173120 OH MW 50 58 09/05/01 CAL SENECHAL AP00173121 003896 OH MW 2,008.77 09/05/01 CHARTER AND SHALlMAR TOURS 004253 AP00173122 OH MW 3.60 09/05/01 RITA SHARP 003967 AP001?3123 OH MW 00 258 09/05/01 SPRINGS SIERRA 006252 AP00173124 OH MW 89 128 3 09/05/01 FINAL AND SMART 001327 AP001?3125 OH MW 40.00 MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC F 09/05/01 CALIF SO 000135 AP00173126 OH MW 378.19 09/05/01 SOFT CHOICE CORP 001825 AP00173127 Void OH VM 00 o 09/05/01 Continued Stub Void VOID.CONTlNU AP00173128 OH MW 127,483.10 09/05/01 CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN 001432 AP00173129 OH MW 100.00 09/05/01 SELF STORAGE STADIUM AP00173130 006343 OH MW 26.00 09/05/01 STAGE DIRECTIONS 001734 AP00173131 OH MW 409.35 09/05/01 INC STERICYCLE 005281 AP00173132 OH MW 52 144 09/05/01 FORD SUNRISE TANDD AP00173133 004733 09/05/01 INSTALLATIONS 005410 AP00173134 OH MW 83 325 OH MW 86 39 09/05/01 TCM LLC 002234 AP00173135 OH MW 31,787.50 09/05/01 REGIONAL LANDCARE TRUGREEN 003388 AP00173136 OH MW 4,655.19 09/05/01 SERVICE UNIFORM UNIFIRST 003437 AP00173137 Name different in Check DB Payee OH MW 182.00 09/05/01 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 000137 AP00173138 OH MW 5,707.10 09/05/01 NURSERIES VILLAGE 003721 AP00173139 OH OH MW MW 42.00 89 1,119 09/05/01 09/05/01 ROSA VILLANUEVA VISTA PAINT AP00173140 004195 001103 AP00173141 ......... ~ ., CITiI. OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/05/01 C H E C K REG I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, SEP 05, 2001, 3,49 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg GL JL--loc: FINANCE -- - j ob, 52284 #S048-----prog' CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG -- - Check Payee 10. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs ReI To Note ---------- ------ ------------------------ = -------- ---------- ---- ---- ------ -------------- _u ---------- ------ ------------------------ -------- ---------- ---- ---- ------ -------------- APOO173142 000213 WAXIE 09/05/01 2,351.45 MW OH APOO173143 006727 WEST END 09/05/01 38.80 MW OH APOO173144 004196 WILLIAMS, VALENCIA 09/05/01 13.00 MW OH 09/05/01 - APOO173145 004220 WILSON, BRITT 100.00 MW OH APOO173146 004197 WODETZHI, SUZANN 09/05/01 18.00 MW OH APOO173147 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 09/05/01 4,180.48 MW OH GRAND TOT A L S, Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 1 Total Void Hand written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Machine Written 664,061. 64 Number of Checks Processed 180 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed 0 GRAND TOT A L 664,061. 64 --- '\\' City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary 2001 August 31 YTM 365 Equlv. 4.502 3.447 5.912 6.485 8.333 5.608 YTM 360 Equlv. 4.440 3.400 5.831 6.396 8.219 5.531 Days to Maturity 89 .388 52 22 1,059 Term 19 ,715 731 5,426 1,336 %01 Portfolio 20. 77.17 1.51 0.00 100,00% 17 5 Book Value 26,647,908.83 1,515,000.00 01,945,231.25 1,995,937.50 458.83 132,104,536.41 Market Value 26,647,908.83 1,514,942.43 03,626,894.06 2,024,375.00 467.68 133,814,588.00 p., Value 26,647,908.83 1,515,000.00 102,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 462.15 132,163,370.98 Investments Local Agency Investment Funds Certificates of OepositINeg. ~ Bank Federal Agency Issues. Coupon Treasury Securities. Coupon Mortgage Backed Securities Investments 2.000 .973 676,322.77 5,347.50 691,670.27 132,796,206.68 5.608 5.531 1,059 1,336 132,839,693.75 August 31 Month Ending 629,917.92 134,317,298.19 5.52% Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase Subtotal Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings Current Year 5,347.50 691,670.27 134,506,258.27 Fiscal Year To Date 1,263,938.42 133,235,115.15 5.58% 676,322.77 676,322.77 Average Dally Balance Effective Rate of Return I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 4, 2000. A copy Of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures, The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govem the management ,. 01 CJ /-v Portfolio CITY CP VS.02f SymRept (PRF _PM1 PM 09:19 Run Date: 0911212001 - '-1 Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31. 2001 Maturity Date YTM Days to 360 Maturity Stated Rate Moody's Purchase Date Average Balance Issuer Investment" CUSIP LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUNO - - Subtotal and Average 26,978.941.09 Bank BANK OF AMERICA ~btotal and Average Issues ~ Coupon 00988 00996 01004 Book Value Market Value Par Value Funds Local Agency Investment 00005 4.440 1 --- 4.440 1 .400 3.400 69 --- 3.400 88 4.502 26,647,908.83 26.647,908.83 26,647,908.83 26,647,908.83 26,647,908.63 26.647,908.83 08/0212001 Deposlt/Neg. 1 Certificates of 08050EZF5 1/29/2001 207 03127/2002 319 07/17/2002 492 01106/2003 ,241 01/24/2005 492 628 872 387 ,020 1,031 542 ,353 .241 .732 ,739 ,747 ,787 ,827 .661 .682 ,682 ,710 ,318 04/11/2005 ,710 05/08/2006 ,710 0510812006 ,717 05115/2006 ,382 06/14/2005 ,781 07/1812006 0110612003 1210812003 01/21/2004 09/23/2002 06117/2004 08/28/2004 02125/2003 0511612005 01/24/2005 05130/2006 06108/2006 06/14/2006 07/24/2008 02114/2006 0312012006 03121/2006 04110/2006 0510812006 6.529 6.162 6.135 5.652 5.444 5.868 5.868 5.624 5.512 5.696 6.145 5.454 5.435 5.676 8.265 6.428 6.910 7.850 5.707 5.731 5.671 5.9n 5.728 5.918 5.548 5.622 5.435 5.444 3 6.620 6.240 6.220 5.730 5.520 5.950 5.950 5.600 5.560 5.750 8.230 5.530 5.510 5.755 6.230 6.480 7.000 7.890 5.760 5.800 5.750 6.060 5.800 6.000 5.625 5.700 5.510 5.520 ,515,000.00 1.515,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,999,375.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,991,250.00 2,997,000.00 1,997,812.50 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,984,531.25 1,996,875.00 1,999,687.50 1,994,375.00 2,997,187.50 1,999,062.50 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,999,375.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 ,514,942.43 1,514,942.43 2,036,415.71 2.044,763.79 2,061,027.83 2,047,500.00 2,004,375.00 2,008,750.00 2,008,750.00 2,019,375.00 3.038,437.50 2,027,500.00 1,033,125.00 2,059,375.00 1,030,000.00 3,068,437.50 3,149,062.50 2,048,750.00 2,033,750.00 2,061,250.00 3,075,000.00 2,042,500.00 2,043,125.00 2,014,375.00 2,029,375.00 2,015,373.84 1,012,951.97 4,010,367.43 4,042,283.94 8,049,577.63 ,515,000.00 1,515,000,00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000.000.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000.000.00 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000.000.00 6,000,000.00 03127/1997 07/17/1997 01/0611998 01/24/2001 04/11/2001 05108/2001 05108/2001 05124/2001 06114/2001 07118/2001 01/06/1998 12/0811998 01/21/1999 03/23/1999 06/17/1999 06128/1999 02/2512000 0512512000 01/24/2001 05130/200 1 061061200 1 06114/2001 07/24/2001 02/14/2001 03/20/2001 03/21/2001 04110/2001 05108/200 1 1.515.000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME lOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME lOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEOERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 075 1087 1095 1097 1100 07 109 01003 01035 01038 01043 01050 01053 059 082 076 103 105 108 110 1078 1081 1082 1086 098 Federal Agency 31331RAA3 31331RDXO 31331RMAO 31331H6E2 31331lFFO 31331lGR3 31331lGR3 31331lHD3 31331LKE7 31331LMPO 3133M2U$4 3133M6NE4 3133M75D4 3133M86L3 3133M94J8 3133M96K3 3133MARK7 3133MBHV2 3133MCX34 3133MFBP2 3133MF7E2 3133MFGAO 3133MGBV7 312923GH2 312923MQ5 312923MJ1 312923SM8 312923284 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF _PM2) SymRept V5.02f 0911212001 - 09:19 Run Date: - oQ Page 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31. 2001 Maturity Date Days to Maturity YTM 380 Stated Rat. Purchase Date Average Balance 5.457 5.632 5.918 5.685 1,768 --- 5.831 1,368 6.396 152 --- 6.396 152 .000 8.219 122 --- 8.219 122 05109/2006 05130/2006 625 05119/2003 06106/2005 08/0512004 0211212004 03129/2006 04111/2006 ,689 04/17/2006 ,689 04/17/2006 ,726 05124/2006 ,738 0610512006 0710512006 ,711 ,732 ,374 ,069 694 ,670 ,683 5.622 5.918 6.041 7.767 5.553 5.374 5.259 5.573 5.680 Moody's 5.700 6.000 6.125 7.675 5.625 5.450 5.300 5.650 5.750 5.510 5.710 6.000 5.750 Book Value 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,999,375.00 3,000,000.00 3,994,375.00 2,000,000.00 1,999,200.00 2,997,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Market Value 5.013,304.90 3,012,305.60 2,070,083.92 3,098,437.50 4,075,000.00 3,026,250.00 4,041,250.00 2,019,375.00 2,021,875.00 3,044,062.50 2,049,375.00 2,012,500.00 2,027,500.00 103,626.894.06 Par Value 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 102,000,000.00 05109/2001 05130/2001 05119/1998 0610612000 0210512001 03/0512001 041041200 1 04/11/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 0512412001 0610512001 07/1812001 Issuer FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEOERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEOERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEOERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NA TL MTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 102,331,904.84 Invesbnent # Coupon 101 104 108 098 102 01018 1065 1077 1079 1085 088 091 092 CUSIP Federal Agency Issues 312923ZY4 312923H99 31364FG96 31364KPT1 31364KR36 31359MGV9 3136FOAL6 3136FODW9 3136FOEVO 3136FOEW8 3136FOLU4 3136FOMC3 3136FORV6 ,998,750.00 101,945,231.25 ,995,937.50 ,995,937,50 2,024,375.00 2,024,375.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 01/31/2000 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average Coupon 058 Treasury Securities 9128275X6 01131/2002 6.375 462.15 462.15 02123/1987 ,995,937.50 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. Subtotal and Average 615.31 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401WW7 00071 01101/2002 Portfolio CITY CP SymRept V5.02f 1,059 PM (PRF _PM2) 5.531 6 458.63 458.83 132,104,536.41 467.68 467.88 133,814,588,00 32,163.370.98 132,820,398.53 Total Investments and Average 09:19 Run Oate: 0911212001 - ~ Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash August 31. 2001 YTM Days to 380 Maturity Moody's Stated Rate Book Value Market Value Par Value Purchase Date Average Balance Issuer Investment . CUSIP .973 2.000 1,059 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF _PM2) SymRept VS.02f 5.531 676,322.77 676,322.77 15,347.50 691,670.27 132,796,208.68 676,322.77 676.322.n 15,347.50 691,670.27 134,506,258.27 Cash Accounts 676,322.77 878,322.n at Purchase 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Cash Subtotal and Average Balance 1,496,699.66 132,839,693.75 Accrued Interest Subtotal 134,317,296.16 Total Cash and Investments 09:19 Run Date: 0911212001 N c::> Page 5 Ending Balance - - - 26,647,908.83 - 678,322.77 - 1.515,000.00 - 101.945,231.25 - 1.995.937.50 - 458.83 - 132.780,859.18 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF _PM3) SymRept V5.02f SalesIMaturitles or WIthdrawals 2,800,000.00 2.800,000.00 847,929.45 847,929.45 1,515,000.00 0.00 1,515,000.00 1,997,812.50 1,997,812.50 346.49 348.49 7,161,088.44 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type August 1, 2001 through August 31, 2001 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases CUSIP Investment. Issuer Balance Rat. Oat. or Deposits - - - Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 4.502 3,500,000.00 Subtotal 25.947,908.83 3,500,000.00 - SavingS/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2.000 0.00 Subtotal 1,524,252.22 0.00 - Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050ERHO 1070 BANK OF AMERICA 6.820 0810212001 0.00 06050EZF5 1111 BANK OF AMERICA 3.400 0810212001 1,515,000.00 Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 - Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 312902E96 1072 FEOERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 7.050 08107/2001 0.00 Subtotal 103,943,043.75 0.00 - Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 1,995,937.50 - Mortgage Backed Securities 313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 08/1512001 0.00 Subtotal 805.32 0.00 - Total 134,926,947.62 5,015,000.00 Nun Dale: 0911212001 .09:19 - Cost Yield Value 3.40% $ 257,311.00 N/A 0.78 3.40% 248,032.00 N/A 0.12 3.40% 8,014.00 N/A 399.00 $ 511,758.90 3.40% $ N/A 3.40% 611,537.00 N/A 0.07 3.40% 1,148,846.00 N/A 0.29 3.40% N/A 3.40% 76,061.00 N/A 0.36 3.40% 195,773.00 N/A 0.28 $ 2,032,218.00 $ 2,543,974.90 8/15/01 1 ;37 PM Maturity Date City of Rancho Cueamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31, 2001 Purchase Date Trustee and/or Pay ina Aaent N/A' N/A N/A' N/A N/A N/A NIAll' N/A N/A* N/A NIN N/A NIN N/A NIN N/A N/A' N/A 8/4/97 N/A 8/4/97 N/A 8/4/97 N/A 7/1/99 N/A 7/1/99 N/A 7/1/99 N/A 7/1/99 N/A 3/2100 N/A 1/16/01 N/A Investl11Qnt FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation Cash FirstAmerican Treasury Obli9ation Cash First American Treasury Obligation Cash First American Treasury Obli9ation Cash FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation Cash FirstAmerican Treasury Obli9ation Cash First American Treasury Obligation Cash First American Treasury Obligation Cash First American Treasury Obligation Cash ~~~J)-.Mnt N~mQ Redemption Fund Expense Fund Sub Resrv. Fund Sr. Resrv. Fund Imprvmnt Fund Imprvmnt Fund Reserve Fund Reserve Fund Redemp. Fund Redemp. Fund Revenue Fund Residual Fund US Bank US Bank Bond Issue Assessment District No 93- Masi Plaza PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series 999 B (Subord) 999 A (Sr) & TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. VinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls ~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA k,'"W.;,:.t:''w.i{i:?ilC\'''.\' ,,<,":",:i"" ,;.."Y)v;'.Fjj>M,<,'UjJji ,:.....,. ",:,,'<<:"'..Y"', . 'J ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO's. 11052085650/1238105-0 AND 12143035650/1293214-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the FY 2001/2002 Bus Bay Improvements at various locations, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUNDIANAL YSIS: The project will construct bus bays on the east and west side of Haven Avenue south of Lemon Avenue, and on the north side of Arrow Route west of Red Oak Street, construct a retaining curb for pedestrian safety along the back of sidewalk at the existing bus bay landing at the east side of Vineyard Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard, and construct a sidewalk landing for the existing bus stop on the east side of Red Oak Street north of Arrow Route. The project will be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant funds (Account No.11052085650/1238105-0) and Pedestrian Grant Article 3 funds (Account No. 12143035650/1293214-0. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $110,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $3,000 estimated for construction survey, and $1,000 estimated for soils and 23 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS September 19, 2001 Page 2 material testing. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 25, 2001 and October 2, 2001, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 16, 2001, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, ~.~ Ihv \f--William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:ls Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution 2'1 LEMON AVE BUS BAYS Faa ou 0 > > '" z :i! :; <'J 8TH 5T 24TH 5T BN5F RR >- 'Q ou NTS : GTH 5T I 1 ~ 4TH 5T :i! ONTARIO CITY LIMIT ARROW BUS BAY VINEYARD * RED OAK BUS PAD RETAINING CURB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. 0 J- 2. Of A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 16, 2001, sealed bids or proposals for the "FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the FY 2001/2002 BUS BAY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of 2(P RESOLUTION NO. September 19,2001 Page 2 per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the gO days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. ;2.1 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2001 Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an 2ft RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2001 Page 4 additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at 29 RESOLUTION NO. September 19, 2001 Page 5 the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of September, 2001 Publish Dates: September 25 and October 2, 2001 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 19th day of September, 2001. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of September, 2001 Executed this 19th day of September, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: September 25 and October 2, 2001 .30 THE I C I T Y o F RANCDO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT No. 00-02 FROM RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC TO MBK HOMES LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, STANDARD PACIFIC CORP., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AND RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION - The development agreement was approved by the City Council on August 16, 2000, for property generally located north of SR-30, east of Day Creek Channel, west of Hanley Avenue, and south of the westerly prolongation of 25th Street. RECOMMENDATION: The City Attomey and the Planning Division staff have reviewed the proposed transfer request and recommend that the City Council consent to the transfer. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and UCP, Inc. (Owner and Developer) entered into a development agreement for the construction and development of a residential development with up to two commercial areas. Section 1 C (Assignment) of the Development Agreement requires the property owner to notify the City, no less than sixty (60) days before any such transfer, in the event the development agreement is assigned (transferred) to a third party (any person, partnership, joint venture, finn or cooperation) (See Exhibit "C"). Further, the notice of the transfer shall also contain all material terms and information regarding the contemplated transfer. On August 14, 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division and City Attomey received a letter and related materials from the property owner declaring its intent to partially transfer the Development Agreement to five separate merchant builders (Standard Pacific, Lennar Homes, MBK, KB Homes, and Richmond American Homes) (See Exhibit "B"). 3/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DA 00-02 - PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT September 19,2001 Page 2 The purpose of this request is to allow the master developer (Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC) to sell portions of the project to various merchant builders. The merchant builders in return will be responsible for the construction of certain improvements within the portion purchased by them. The master developer will remain responsible for the construction of the backbone infrastructure (i.e. Construction of Day Creek Boulevard, Wilson Avenue, Blue Grass Street and Banyan Street). Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SS\ls Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Developer's Attorney letter requesting consent Transfer of the Development Agreement Exhibit "C" - Pages 3 and 4 of Development Agreement 00-02 .32 I I I I I I I I I Ie I -------- I- ....:. == = A."!;. IX. 'i'7 y ~ -~,V \ .x/ / "/. ~<$} t - I-- ,-y~,--.'~ ~LI.'Fr': .'.'-'1 r-..OFl.lfl V'n'r'll 'liT ')ULITTiJ; [~ nlnlLT\ ~ . J. . \'JUson Avel1ue '> . '~+~'." .' J 1"L7I-1 H~ I'-,.HI-I"-:. ... .. i"-f r:.J:::jH-l . -t ~ f-:- . ~~". . '.' .' f'-,I L..::J cerl'" . -;.1'- V TI ':1'"" 'T :1. nIT lor T.T '" .' .'. II.tJl/.l'l,lf /',.. i.:..HI.IHITT I '. 'TTI JrTrrr-\'i:-rTnUl,l:;),J I . .1 II'--JI /11 '.. f'., LI ~nm~U1L 11 I T . ;1. J+ti rT.. ?I."=', Le..., . :;::J;;?,. ;.-,-'r-r ~ IE:: " ,..", J II. '1>.1.1...'-' I..,..... .... ,.' ./' rJ7 . . -.'"'" . . I' . ':1 I . .) ~ .. . .... ,T II' IITT/ILlI ',,51:; ....... ". .... IJlTTTT _II" '::,I'I.f' I::.:r TI:III: 'lIT' :.n-llt/II. f.-'i=-Flf-- ,. . ..' . .....,. NAP '''l'T['I"'n'''r. .1l' . j:'. r:l 'T - ~ ... 1: 0 " .. .; '. m A <:: )+.}~~iiii . .I,:ii ,..,..~t~~'.t"',.., ." -~~~ ~.~:'.~~~~. '-~'.' 1\.:Jt.lrL,., '1.-. ,rl ".: ";:': '; ,', ,:: ..',*, " ..Uti." ~"I';"L......:. I.' _.f,: ; .' "':. .... ..' ". .t;::: .' .' . ,i[.IT-lTl' '.-~ .. . f,-'r e!;llni '.1= IL:rm. '.,r,,"0 ~.m NAP '11.1-1 t).W. LLIlli ~ ~ 'A " ~r .;.. I:..~:;:.> *Ii . ,~~~:. ~~',;,:~""r~": ~~".,...... 4;~;;~'~:!; ~.;~~.:.. '. BY: A,I,LARp ENGINEERING C,v,1 fngmoerlng - lAnd PIOttning IUGI CIlIfIY Awnul Fonlono, Collfomkl 'WI (Ioe) 0"-5011 rlllll (000) MI~5014 / Summil Avenuo LEGEND D II ~\Y'\' ". "~'.' "",::", SINGLE FAMILY (7.200 SF = MINIMUM LOT SIZE) PUBUC (PARK & ELEM. SCHOOL) COMMERCIAL RANCHO ETIWANDA ADOPTED UNIVERSITY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ..33- Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC 5109 E. La Palma Avenue, Suite D Anaheim, CA 92807 Telephone: (714) 693-6700 Facsimile: (714) 693-6731 August 14, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 20 2001 RECEIVED - PLANNING Via Certified Mail To: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Community Development Director Re: Notice of Partial Assignments of Development Agreement Project: Rancho Etiwanda Project Owner: Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC Development Agreement, between Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC (as successor-in-interest to D.C.P. Incorporated) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, dated November 29, 2000, and recorded on December 22, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000472811 (the "Development Agreement") The purpose of this letter is to advise the City, pursuant to Section 1.C. of the Development Agreement, that Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC (as successor-in-interest to D.C.P. Incorporated) ("Seller") intends to sell portions of the Rancho Etiwanda Project to each of the following builders or their permitted assignees: (i) MBK Homes Ltd., a California limited partnership, (ii) Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation, (iii) Standard Pacific Corp., a Delaware corporation, (iv) KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc., a California corporation, and (v) Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., a Colorado corporation (collectively, the "Buyers," and individually a "Buyer"). In connection with each sale transaction, Seller will be partially assigning certain of Seller's rights and obligations under the Development Agreement to the respective Buyer. For your information, enclosed herewith is the form of the Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement which Seller and the Buyers have agreed on in connection with each such sale transaction. l'{? II ~tf Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLc, a Delaware limited liability company By: Q~ ~t -- Its: cc: City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon One Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Attention: James Markman, Esq. c35 Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: [Buyer] Attention: (Space above this line for Recorder's use only) PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Rancho Etiwanda) This PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT (the "Partial Assignment") is made on this day of and between RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC, a Delaware limited ("Assignor"), and , a ("Assignee"). DEVELOPMENT ,2001, by liability company RECITALS -------- A. Assignor is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, commonly known as the Rancho Etiwanda Project and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Rancho Etiwanda Project"). B. Assignor and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (the "City") are parties to that certain Development Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2000, and recorded on December 22, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000472811 (the "Development Agreement"), which Development Agreement contains certain rights, duties and obligations relating to the development of the Rancho Etiwanda Project. C. Assignor is currently under contract to sell a portion of the Rancho Etiwanda Project to Assignee pursuant to the terms of that certain Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated , 2001 between Assignor, as "Seller", and Assignee, as "Buyer," as may be amended from time to time (collectively, the "Purchase Agreement"), which portion of the Rancho Etiwanda Project is particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"). Page I ..3~ D. Pursuant to the tenns of the Purchase Agreement, Assignor has agreed to assign to Assignee certain of its rights and interests under the Development Agreement, to the extent the Development Agreement relates to the Property. In addition, Assignor and Assignee have agreed that Assignor shall delegate to Assignee certain of the obligations of Assignor under the Development Agreement, which obligations shall be assumed by Assignee, and that those obligations not delegated and assumed by Assignee pursuant to this Partial Assignment shall remain the obligations of Assignor, as set forth herein. Accordingly, Assignor desires to assign and delegate certain rights and obligations under the Development Agreement to Assignee and Assignee desires to accept such assignment and assume certain obligations under the Development Agreement, as provided below in this Partial Assignment. E. The purpose of this Partial Assignment is to set forth the tenns and provisions agreed upon between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the assignment of certain rights and interests and the delegation of certain obligations of Assignor under the Development Agreement, to the extent the Development Agreement relates to the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing Recitals, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: I. Partial Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns, conveys and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor's rights and interests under the Development Agreement to the extent such rights and interests relate to the Property or the development thereof and Assignee hereby accepts such assignment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Assignor shall retain all rights and interests under the Development Agreement relating to the obtaining of "Reimbursements" (as that tenn is defined in the Purchase Agreement) and all rights and interests relating to the obtaining of public financing, including the right to any and all proceeds from such public financing, as more fully set forth in the Purchase Agreement. 2. Delegation of Obligations. Assignor hereby delegates to Assignee certain obligations of Assignor as the "Property Owner" under the Development Agreement, consisting of (a) any obligations relating to the construction of physical improvements on the Property, (b) the obligation of cooperation under Section I.D. of the Development Agreement as it relates to the Property or the development of the Property, (c) the development obligations under Section 2.A. of the Development Agreement, to the extent applicable to the Property, (d) the obligation of the Property Owner to comply with rules, regulations, laws and policies in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.B. of the Development Agreement, to the extent applicable to the Property, (e) the obligation to pay fees pursuant to Section 2.H. of the Development Agreement, to the extent applicable to the Property or improvements constructed on the Property, (f) the obligation to apply for and obtain pennits in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.1. of the Development Agreement, to the extent applicable to the Property, (g) the obligation to pay attorneys' fees in any action in which Assignee is a party pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.C. of the Development Agreement, and (h) the obligations set forth in the miscellaneous provisions of the Development Agreement (Section 5 of the Development Agreement), to the Page 2 37 extent applicable to the Property or to Assignee by reason of its ownership of the Property, all of which obligations are hereby assumed by Assignee; provided, however, that Assignor shall retain the remaining obligations under the Development Agreement not previously assigned to and assumed by any successor or assign of Assignor, including the obligations relating to the formation and obtaining of public financing. Assignee acknowledges that the formation and obtaining of any such public financing will result in assessments against the Property, and the owner or owners of the Property or portions thereof shall be responsible for the payment of such assessments first accruing after the close of escrow under the Purchase Agreement, as more fully set forth in the Purchase Agreement. 3. Amendment to Development Agreement. Assignor and Assignee agree that any amendment to the Development Agreement requiring the approval of the "Property Owner" that affects the Property shall require the approval in writing of both Assignor and Assignee. Assignor shall have the right to amend the Development Agreement without the approval of Assignee if the amendment does not modifY the Development Agreement as it affects the Property. 4. Contingency. The parties hereby agree that the effectiveness of this Partial Assignment is contingent upon the completion of the sale of the Property to Assignee pursuant to the provisions of the Purchase Agreement. In the event the Close of Escrow under the Purchase Agreement does not occur, the parties agree that this Partial Assignment shall be of no force or effect whatsoever. 5. Miscellaneous. 5.1 Interpretation; Governing Law. This Partial Assignment shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as prepared by both parties hereto. This Partial Assignment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any action hereunder shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California. 5.2 Attorneys' and Other Fees. In the event of any dispute between the parties hereto or institution of any action or proceeding to interpret or enforce the provisions of this Partial Assignment, or arising out of the subject matter of this Partial Assignment or the transaction contemplated hereby, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable expenses, attorneys' fees and costs, including professional or expert consultation or testimony fees, both at trial and on any appeal and in any administrative proceeding. 5.3 Authority. Each of the parties hereto represents and warrants to the other that the person or persons executing this Partial Assignment on behalf of such party is or are authorized to execute and deliver this Partial Assignment and that this Partial Assignment shall be binding upon such party. 5.4 Further Assurances. Assignor and Assignee each agree to do such further acts and things and to execute and deliver such additional agreements and instruments as the Page 3 ~~ other may reasonably request to consummate, evidence, confirm or more fully implement the agreements of the parties as contained herein. 5.5 Execution in Counterparts. This Partial Assignment may be executed in several counterparts, and all so executed shall constitute one agreement between the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Partial Assignment to be effective as of the date of the satisfaction of the contingency set forth in Paragraph 4 above. "Assignor" RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Its: "Assignee" a By: Its: By: Its: Page 4 .gq Exhibit "A" to PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description Of Rancho Etiwanda Proiect 1D Exhibit "B" to PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description Of Property If/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ) On ,2001, before me, the undersigned, a notary public, personally appeared_ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in hislher authorized capacity, and that by hislher signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public Name (Typed or Printed) (Notarial Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ) On ,2001, before me, the undersigned, a notary public, personally appeared_ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in hislher authorized capacity, and that by hislher signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public Name (Typed or Printed) (Notarial Seal) 12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ) On ,2001, before me, the undersigned, a notary public, personally appeared_ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in hislher authorized capacity, and that by hislher signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public Name (Typed or Printed) (Notarial Seal) tf3 e ( , e I I {. ,. , Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Effectiveness ofDevelooment Alrreement Notwithstanding the effective date of the Enacting Ordinance, this Development Agreement shall only become operative and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall only arise, if all of the following have occurred before March 01, 2001, unless that date is mutually extended in writing by Property Owner and the CITY: (i) The Project Site has been annexed to the CITY and said annexation is fina1 as to any and all administrative actions, and is not then subject to judicial challenge; and (ii) The Parties have perfoxmed all of their respective obligations under the Settlement and Pre-Annexation Agreement B. Term The texm of this Development Agreement shall commence on the effective date of the enacting Ordinance and shall extend for a period often (10) years thereafter (the "Term''), unless this Development Agreement is terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Development Agreement, including, without limitation, the extensions provided below and any extension attributable to the ''force majeure" circumstances described in Section 2D5 hereof or by mutual written consent of the Parties. Following the expiration of the Tenn, this Development Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that such termination shall not affect any right or duty arising from project entitlements granted prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Development Agreement and the structures that are developed in accordance with this Development Agreement and the use of those structures shall continue to be governed by this Development Agreement for purposes of ensuring, for land use purposes, that those structures continue to be legal conforming structures and that those uses continue to be legal conforming uses. <:. Assi~t Subject to the terms of this Development Agreement, Property Owner shall have the right to convey, assign, sell, lease, sublease, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise transfer (for purposes of this Development Agreement, "Transfer") the Project Site, in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development Agreement, and to the extent of each such Transfer, the transferor sba11 be relieved of its legal duty to perfoxm such obligations under this Development Agreement at the time of the Transfer, except to the extent Property Owner is in Defanlt, as defined in Section 3<: hereof, of any of the terms of this Development Agreement when the Transfer occurs. Ifall or a portion of the Project Site is Transferred and there is noncompliance by the transferee owner with respect to any term and condition of this Development Agreement, or by the transferor with respect to any portion of the Project Site not sold or Transferred, such noncompliance shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement by that transferee or transferor, as applicable, but shall not be deemed to be a breach hereunder against other persons then owning or holding any interest in any other portion of the Project Site and not themselves in breach under this Development Agreement. Any alleged breach shall be governed by the provisions of Section 3<: hereof. In no event shall the reservation or dedication of a portion of the Project Site to a public agency cause a transfer of duties and obligations under this Development Agreement to such public agency unless specifica1Iy stated to be the case in this Development Agreement, any of the exlnbits attached to this Development Agreement, the instrument of conveyance used for such reservation or dedication, or other form of agreement with such public agency. e,' C 1/ 0I:veI0pmat ~ 4-24-OO.cd - 3- 1tf . I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I . f ~. , Property Owner shall notify the CITY not less than sixty (60) days before any such Transfer, and such notice shall contain all material information regarding the contemplated Transfer, including but not limited to the identity of the transferee, and the material terms of such contemplated Transfer. D. Amendment of Al!reement This Development Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of the Parties in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary in this Development Agreemen~ the Parties may enter into one or more implementing agreements, as set forth below, to clarify the intended application or inteIpretation of this Development Agreemen~ without amending this Development Agreement Property Owner and the CITY acknowledge that the provisions of this Development Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between Property Owner and the CITY and that, in the course of the development of the Project Site, it may be necessary to supplement this Development Agreement to address the details of the Parties' respective performance and obligations, and to otherwise effectuate the pmposes of this Development Agreement and the intent of the Parties. If and when, from time to time, the Parties find that it is necessary or appropriate to clarify the application or interpretation of this Development Agreemen~ without amending the Development Agreement, the Parties may do so through one or more implementing agreements (the "Implementing Agreement"), which shall be executed by the Community Development Director of CITY (the "Community Development Director") and by an authorized representative of Property Owner. After execution, each Implementing Agreement shall be attached as an addendum and become a part of this Development Agreement, and may be further changed or supplemented from time to time as necessary. Such Implementing Agreement shall not require the approval of the City Council of the CITY and shall only be executed by the Community Development Director (on behalf of the CITY), if the Conununity Development Director has detennined that such implementing agreements are not materially inconsistent with this Development Agreemen~ and the applicable ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies of the CITY in effect at the time of execution of this Development Agreement Any changes to this Development Agreement which would impose additional obligations on the CITY beyond those which would be deemed to arise under a reasonable interpretation of this Development Agreement, or which would pmport to change land use designations applicable to the Project Site under the Revised UniveIllity Project Entitlements, shall be considered "material" and require amendment of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Section 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF TIIE PROJECf A. Land Use Entitlements The land use entitlements approved by the County are depicted on Ex1nbit ''B''. The Parties acknowledge that, without being obligated to do so, Property Owner plans to develop the Project Site in substantial conformity with the Revised University Project Entitlements as amended by this Development Agreement. During the Term, the permitted uses for the Projec~ or any portion thereof, the density and intensity of use, zoning, maximum height and size of proposed buildings, building and yard setback requirements, provisions for reservations or dedications, design and performance standards and other teImS and conditions of development of the Revised University Projec~ shall be those set forth in the Revised University Project Entitlements as amended by this Development Agreement. The specific terms of this Development Agreement shall supercede and be controlling over any conflict and/or inconsistency with the Revised University Project Entitlements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the total number oflots in the approved tracts total 685 lots and that lots may be shifted between tracts without increasing the overall number of lots and be in substantial conformity with the Revised University Project Entitlements as amended by this Development Agreement The CITY Planner shall exercise his reasonable discretion to review transfeIll of lots between tracts and make the determination of substantial compliance. Other certain specific modifications of the Revised University Project Entitlements to which the Parties agree are set forth below. All Exlubits attached hereto constitute material provisions of the Development Agreemen~ and are incotpOrated herein. I)nrcJapn1CIIlJ.areemclll4024-00.ed Jf5 -4- RAN C HOC U C A M 0 N G A lli.~ ,_,,=w~_ = ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 15651, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF ROCHESTER COURT AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY PARAGON ROCHESTER LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 15651 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15651 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 8, 2001, for the division of 7.08 acres of land into two parcels in the Industrial District (Subarea 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the terminus of Rochester Court and on the west side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of 6th Street. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Respectfully submitted, lLttv ~ Wic.llliaEm~: O'Neil Ity nglneer WJO:MB:sc Attachments '1ft; Vicin~W, Map i j I . ' , , , , I I , . , , . . II . .. I t t ,W i , I I\ ,; ~ / il /l/i~ II;~!' ,j I '1 1/ I' /, I 'i I : I ,,/' \..1': ' / i L-----..-l j : '--__l._.-LJ;,. ~ _~---=.-=-. ~J _ -::" ..._-=--=t_~~~Jt i "j t~Y~ !=~I uJ. '~fJ '^, ' . 1f" III r tJAY-ttJ, L' ,~7?> : " I "" I . ,! I. !' )', -- /~t1' . "--J' j L d- i ,.,' L_JI ~ [~l '-1 ; I. C-----T" / IL~~ :' )",1""1,-1'_ i ,. Il --r'" I". !I,' Lc.; jilL i ! I, I /'/1 ! ' .~ /1 , I I I',' i V )--' lli ' i ' . I' , ( . LJ ,j i" '=;<\"*P"l'\]5{;5r--:~ Ii I 1"/' Iii IlJ~;NO~1 f------i \\-. -L, (l ~ Ii i I! If I \\ Ii, ,'!\r 1_ (( ---i Jb M I I! I I I '---<I r ~ H' --j!' I ~-iJi 1 ~. : I '-iII i I----.::Tlirr-] , ~ - ", I: .- 'I I " ", II i : :i------! ~ j! - 1" i f--~--ii Ii: - . \;jl' ~ i i ~J'ss16N~/ ~ Ii' ! 1 i! /j ! i H Ii It ~TH F::----~ I : i~ , il ,J . I / I' } ,! I"'T'i ' i j !i I' 'f J=d-i I , " LJ Iml . I I' i I /--' I , I i r- ;i): I ;: I i II?::..! I! r, --<I ii Ii It II ,I Ii 1\ ---I! !\-----i' \\ Ii \\- !i ': 1: \ ii l' \ Ii _. / , , /'----~ ....--~ , I I / .' I [ ill ;! i /~' ! Iii,' \ ..LL._l__ -=-~ .-::-,:-=--...i-~ _ _= ~= = =t = -TI~T ! H! ~ ~.:~;. i-J' , ! d i! :f I',~ 'I ',:1., It I" j II u i!.---- 'I ------'---, '..--1' 'I' l Ii i _.JJ !..: .' it 'I II ! ! ; i i t I I r1 I I 1 i I !' I Ii! lh! -:]--- I'll il 11:,--. I - III! II ,1,,-- , " " - -li " II 11 ii H . ,i -1: iI !j Ii il II l! lill I,i- l'li ,I:' 'I :i, ~ \,' ii! i H . l: f ilLLLJ :; ,i ~L City of Rancho Cucamonga Ii Ii p j< I i I I , ~ I tf1~ 5~~OeTAlI.'A'\_ ;' ...., SIXTH sr.( SIXTH I ~-_._-~-~i.~ \ 1'i'1 '-+/ '. I! i; lleT "All' )O'!;'), TAG~24145~ ,24;9_~ or Sl-lE:ET 1'0" lP I. TAG 'ClTYeNll.1LCL1U..' ,...nlU',"",IlUIfI1~" !l SIXTH ~!XT~.!~. STREE~ <!'oul'_ -':),a.... ::!:Z'R\.. "'~I!:: :tJ""lli w! I . '" ' G ~ DETAIL "A" ICALe1'. l'-O' 8660 PARCEL MAP NO. 15651 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EEINQ A DNIION OF A P'ClfmON OF LOr" UN' OF AOCtEEI1at AS PER l't.AT RECOIlED N BDCIC eOFMN'8, PAtE. FECClfI)8 OF UN EIIWIDt<<) COMl'Y, STATE (II CM.FaNA MARC DALE ASSOCIATES, INC. MARC A. DALE R.C.E. 24645 JULY 2001 1.08 A~E:S CROSS 6.68 ACRES NET TWO (2) PARCELS PARceL 7, PM PMB 10'80&111 'M. lIfI.'I' Lue Ol"ltQ.1, 1'./11. IHO,PWD lallOW &'LT LUle 01' PCL 7, luo, PlIlIlItOJtOl.I1 ~YLlHC!o.-PCL', '.....Il&O,MIOIIllUI PARceL 6, PM 16&0 PMe 10/10.1.81 , . ..; I " ,'.:' : I~ ~ i " I ~i z ou' >I~ '" .~ ElL '"". "'I~.o lJ). CE!~ ":il~l~ ~I'~~~ u. . , . \>'. , ~ I ' , , .. , . 1'S 'I,a ',- ~:~ :ij , ," ~~ :~ ., I .' ~It-, ....1 .,j..~1 ':J/ . _h ; -----" , )' WIDe OCD. ~It HI6HW"T AHl) ItI:l..ATI:O PUllPOieI tN ""VOIl OI"THl!:CITTOl'lWlCHOCUCAlolONGA I"!It OllCUll;eNT IlI:CCMOI:O JUNe \ 1001 AS IMITll!tO. 100l1l11411a,O.1l w:::,:Itff 1 1591866 $.F. ----~~~~--~~~~----- ----"-n'jQ--c--4&i.i sotJ2' (411.1II') ti'if IN snt55' (J (I2IUJ', [1211.411') NAIL' Rc;e14..S I'LTLlNelPPCLI,P.ll 1!50,PMlICIItIOUl cu~.ae.1AC: oeo. I"CIlllIlllHWAT ANOIl!LATl!OPUIlfIOal!IIH'...vall 01" THfClTT OP'ltf.NCIfOCUCAWONlIA PfIlDDOJMfNTeC;O/lIleOJlN!L ZCICII A' INln.No.I00101147I1,O.l. '?~39 2 131,167 S.P. .".". "'WIDf DllAllWlf weMet.lT nlll!IlMP'ITOP'''.....Cm.1 'J ....". CJ {"arms" ....,.". -" e\.TLINll!OP'W\.TltlZM..OI' LOT~TltACTCII"IlOCHelTtlI: ex;. OP'IUlI'I, P'. 10 I'fll DeeD :.co:~egl!=c~...l:! ~:~ ~~ce:'~ Clf'S4NleIlIWttlINQCOUfolTY. 1"0. 2' I"'T.... ~WOOtl'lICEl1CIl ACCe'Teo .... swu ~Clll"OltLOT". {....V) ~ I ! W'l.T LINe OP' LOT ~. TItACTCIf'AOl)le,Tel Illr:.CII"........,P.20 " ~ II , I I '"' ii ~' f., , J_m P'O ... , W &TAWPeO I Ice 11411 ~II'MNO. n' 5" "" "''',w,,~, - I: I'D .,.ioWIT...Ml"eO l'iI ~ce 114ft I'e~ CL Tf! NOn:HIfIIIS.'.... ~' NO. "121,""1l 111167-10 1 SAN MARINO ST. -j.ei",,*,Hil.-tiiii-- Ift.TLIN!:CII"PCL\P.ll 11121, P'IIIII IlIm-1O t.. -/1244.17')- - -(H U"4,'IIl'"[j (12H.1f) 1411'42'ID"( v ... ~' fA '" ~ OIOZO " ,,. - - ~ GRAPHIC S - .. '" .....---W'LTUNeOI"I'tL..P.M. aaa. Pte IOIeOUl f60.lXl') "----+- I l!STM.IlT INTl!1t. 01 PORTION OF LOT )1 ACC~eO"'INW'l.Y COII:IteIl I'OIl LOT)I. II TRACT 0" ROCHeSTeR ell:. I 0" t.lAP9 I P. 20 ~~ ,..:~ U , ~ a=-ri":l ~i&'i' "'"I . ou. . G.,~t old ....' I-~\ ;, u~r . Q' ""I - ~;, j ? ~~I !i 0'" . 0"1 ,It ~. "'~a:.. ..J, 1.-.s.I$}yJ, -~...... m /HDICATrS RECORD P(Il PAl 11222. PIIS 129/51~60 MlICAltSRCCOROPERPU8550.PllBgo/iO-" PARceL ~ PM PNe12J1!7-60 MONUMENT NOTES . IHDlCAltS flJUND IICWU.W[NT AS SIlO.. o lNOICAltS SCT 1-'" TAGCED "Rcr24645" .0. INOICAlESsnlltlWUWfHT AS ..... ~L"'OMCUIlII,l.SoUU O.Cl1R.YOl'W'LTPIIOLOHS"'TlCIHOP /fLY LINfClf'1'CL\ I"W&lllll,IUfl7-1O W\.T Life 01' PC!. ,"P.w. "222,,"11I&121167-10 8ASIS OF BEARINGS 1I1f BCARlHGS SHOIW HEREON.w: SASDl ON 1HE SEARlNGN 00'10' 52" [ Of 1}j[ a:Nl[RUHE or ROO/CSltR A'o(NlJ[, NOW CHAAlE.S SWl1l-I A~NU[, AS PER PARCEllltAP NO. 11222, PUB 129/57-60. --t: ~ RESOLUTION NO. OI-2~Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15651 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15651) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15651, submitted by paragon Rochester LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and consisting of two parcels, located at the terminus of Rochester Court and on the west side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of 6th Street, being a division of7.08 acres of land, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 8, 2001; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 15651 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 15651 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. t(9 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MiiL"'" ""'~*" a =.~~~ ._~ "'"'''''' "">><r'-"""""""',y,.... ,,~",),. .,""'''''''~.'''''''''''''." ~e ,~ _~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15492, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY KB HOMES G LOS ANGELES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map No. 15492, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District NO.4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, in the Low Medium Residential District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 10, 2001, for a residential subdivision of 139 single-family lots on 33.3 acres of land. The Developer, KB Homes G Los Angeles, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit: $1,715,000.00 $ 857,500.00 $ 2,750.00 so CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15492 September 19, 2001 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sc Attachments ~/ oJ ~ --- :=J . VICINITY MAP BASE UNE ROAO . [ III ::0 Z III ~ PROJECT SITE m III :t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :a ~ [ FOOTHILL BOU ~RD I( .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO . STATE OF CALIFORNIA g ~ . ;. a j:::j I ---- Sd- RESOLUTION NO. t) / - 2 tJ3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15492 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND MONUMENT ATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15492, submitted by KB Homes G Los Angeles, located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, being a division of139 single-family lots on 33.3 acres ofland in the Low Medium Residential District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 10, 200 I, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15492 is the final map of the division ofland approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by KB Homes G Los Angeles as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Maintenance and Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Tract Map No. 15492 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ..s3 RESOLUTION NO. 0 J.. 261 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 FOR TRACT 15492 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cali fomi a, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No.4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation ofterritory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and S'/ RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15492 September 19,2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIUD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. ss Exhibit A Identification ofthe Owner and Description ofthe Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: KAUFMAN & BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15492, BEING A SUBDIVISION F THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15453, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 191 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES(S) 26, 27 AND 28, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. A-I s~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 (fERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): Landscape Maintenance District No.4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to e associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway Park, Spruce Park and La Mission Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD # I) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. SIREEf llGHf MAINTENANCE DISfRICT NO. 4 (IERRA VlSfAPLANNED COMMUNITY): Street Light Maintenance District No.4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven A venue, south of Base Line Road, . north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester A venue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. B-1 t:S7 Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15492 Street Lights SLD # 1 SLD # 4 Landscaping L2 5800L 40 Community Trail DGSF "Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU 139 9500L Turf SF 2,865 S I 139 B-2 Number of Lamps 16,OOOL 5 Non-Turf SF 52,778 S4 139 22,OOOL I 27,500L Trees EA 322 L2 139 sg Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) will not be increased in fiscal year 2000/0 I. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No.4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): #of Assessment #of Rate Per Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 1788 1.0 1788 $252.50 $ 451,470.00 Family Multi- Unit 2499 1.0 2499 $222.00 $ 554,778.00 Family Commercial Acre 199.45 1.0 199.45 $382.99 $ 76,387.36 TOTAL $1,082,635.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15492) is: 139 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $28.96 Rate Per A.U. = $4,025.44 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15492) is: 139 Units x I A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $2,470 Annual Assessment C -I .$9 Exhibit "C" continued STREETLIGlIT"MAlNTENANCEDISIRICTNO.4 (fERRA VISfA PLANNED COMMUNl1Y): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $28.96 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Ty.pe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Multi- Unit 2,499.00 .05 1,249.50 $28.96 $36,186.00 Family Single Parcel 1,786.00 1.00 1,786.00 $28.96 $51,723.00 Family Commercial Acre 199.45 2.00 398.90 $28.96 $11,552.00 TOTAL $99,461.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (rR 15492) is: 139 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $28.96 Rate Per A.U. = $4,025.44 Annual Assessment C-2 ~o I'~'H_ ~_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- ,;/\Ff+"""'J,,",~"'- m;;;,w""" ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-59, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 8rn STREET AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY OPUS WEST CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-59, located at the southwest corner of 8th Street and Rochester Avenue, east of Buffalo Avenue, in the Industrial District (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2001, for the division of 15.55 acres into two lots. The Developer, Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $207,800.00 $103,900.00 (PI CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 00-59 - OPUS WEST CORPORATION September 19, 2001 Page 2 The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~~ -::fw William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:sc Attachments ~2 .~ . .'~ Vicinity Ma~ 6TH $T~ .' '-,.-':.. . 4TH, . . . . ~... BERHAffOfNO FRWY ',0; ".- . ~ OR. .," )" I. ...- -- " ~ of Rancho Cucamon~ . ,II) , -- ~ Q I .~ t,3 RESOLUTION NO. 01-2lJ.5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-59 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of 8th Street and Rochester Avenue, east of Buffalo A venue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 00-59; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: I. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. (p'-f RESOLUTION NO. 6/- 2 tJ/tJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DR 00-59 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cali fomi a, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and fe,5 RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-59 September 19, 2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article xmD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby fmds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. ~, Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: OPUS WEST CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THE LAND REFERRED TO IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 502 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED ON JULY 11,2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20010275698 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 0229-251-34. PARCEL 2: PARCEL B OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 502 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED ON JULY 11,2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20010275698 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 0229-262-06. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I t.7 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 I . +- . . I I . , I I I~ ~. 50' Iso' . I i , I i . I i . I i , ~ a!i , a!, ..:\ OIl' 4\ , ~I . ~ I . , so~t, ~~\ -.. ..._~..__..-----!.I' . '. ROOIE51ER AVDIUE -- ---------- S. . I . I i , I i i i , I . l ---"-CH>>ii1S 0 '-"5iiffii"--' ,-- '---rT~l'l-ii---_~Vi. ""- S'l ' .s....:..-.___ . , . I I I t.. ". ,\:~ .N'\, .!\ "', I.'~~ I \\~ '\:.~ .~ III :.~'~~ ~ "'- i I I I 1\1 I I I I 0 . I l'l' ~~:.-;n ~ I . . ,lD.~ l1\...- .2- . -I ~ I 11.1'-1 . 0 ml'- I'- I~ '""lJ) Oll'- "<it I::; ,., '. IIII') l'l I "'......... ~ l'l l.. ~\:l:t: . . ci 1. I 9 ""In 0 OZ'lt I ~ ~ 0 z ~L) ~~ ~ .::511: r"" z~ b... ::E...J '1 0 .'. 0.:.0, t'l 'It . Oll ...Jl1\'1 hl. 1/1 U--,ol . ~hl ,I ~ PARCEL ~~ tOl 'A' .<( I b ~D.. I ...I . - ~ I I - I LEGEND ~T~IGHT ' 5600 L HP.5V. ~ , .51: LIGHT i'J500 L HP.sV I . I I i I I I I i . , AVENU ' l--rr-- - . I. . . ., I . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHE~T A-2- .. . ... ,: fl -l . W 0 U Z .. . ~ S . ~ 111 '. dI m 1\1 .... hi U 0: <( D.. o z ~ I\. -ll. 1 z DR 00-59 0' . blJ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the CommerciallIndustrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD # I) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 If/I Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 200112002) For Project: DR 00-59 Street Lights SLD # I SLD # 6 5800L 10 Landscaping L3B Community Trail DGSF 9500L 2 Number of Lamps 16,000L 22,000L Turf SF Non-Turf SF *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU or Acres S I S6 B-2 27,500L Trees EA 50 L3B 7D Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (AD.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2000/01. summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance ( Commercialllndustrial): The following table District No. 38 #of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units 1 Jnits Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1849.01 1.0 1849.Q] $352.80 $652,330.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-59) 16.43 Acres x 1 A.D. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per AV. = $5,796.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.V.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): #of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use llnit Type Units 1 Jnit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 FaIl)i1y Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-59) is: 16.43 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per AU. = $584.10 Annual Assessment C -I 7/ Exhibit "c" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.V.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (Commercialllndustrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units lJnit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue Commllnd Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-59) is: 16.43 Acres x I AV. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per AU. = $844.50 Annual Assessment C-2 12. RANCHO CUCAMONGA m.",4:iiiili' - "^ ~MlMmtl!>J'" ="""'=."i"""'"~ pn"q;",=""",~~~<._ ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B. AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 00-31, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY PETER K. VAGENAS AND JAMES KEFALLlNOS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 00-31, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS CUP 00-31, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street, in the Office Professional District, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2000. This project is for the construction of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant and an 824 square foot outdoor eating area on 1.25 acres of land. The Developers. Peter K. Vagenas and James Kefallionos, are submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Cash Deposit: Labor and Material Cash Deposit: $3,400.00 $1,700.00 73 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 00-31 September 19, 2001 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:V'N:sc Attachments 7Lf 1/9 TII ST. k "5 .... t 8AS2: LINE ~ ~ ~SlT.€ ~ CUP tJtJ - 3/ ~ v + rOt2T#/LL BL.V.o. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGlNEERING DIVIBION .. + ~ ," ~ :'J .~ ~ -t ~ N ITEM: CUP 00-31 TITLE: VICINITY MAP 75 RESOLUTION NO. () I -2 tJ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 00-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 19,2001, by Peter K. Vagenas and James Kefallinos as Developers, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as CUP 00-31; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: I. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 7~ RESOLUTION NO. 0/- 2 tJ 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 00-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 ofthe "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article xmD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and 77 RESOLUTION NO. CUP 00-31 September 19,2001 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article )CIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost ofthe proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 7rg Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: PETER K. V AGENAS AND JAMES KEF ALLINOS The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4869, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 49 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 46 AND 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I CUP 00-31 79 eN/181T A-I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 P 00-.3/ .. .. ~~ ~. ~I>> .....lJ"' . V\ 7.25 AC 1$3 .93 7. ".7' .ST~EcT TJeEES ST~EeT LIGHT li'OAO . , '" .. ~ ~ 1.83 AC. M,{. ~ ;;- 25z (10.67 AC. Mil) I I Ir . I . - - - - "7*~.7T f - - -= ... 2 64. I Et4~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I .: s:. !ti, A NORTII ~l) Jd/p 411-3/ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000nOOl LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercialllndustrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRlAL): Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 CUP 00-31 <6/ Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 200112002) For Project: CUP 00-31 Street Lights SLD#1 SLD # 6 5800L Landscaping L3B Community Trail DGSF *One street light installed with original project. Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres 1 1.25 S 1 2.5 B-2 Number of Lamps 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 2* Turf SF Non-Turf SF S6 1.25 27,500L Trees EA 2 L3B 1.25 CUP 00-31 <ll Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3D (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2000/01. summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance (Commercialllndustrial) : The following table District No. 3B # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor lInits Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1849.oI 1.0 1849.01 $352.80 $652,330.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 00-31) is: 1.25 Acres x 1 AU. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per AU. = $441.00 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (AU.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use I Tn it Type lJnits IInits Factor Units IInit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 00-31) is: 1.25 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $44.43 Annual Assessment C-l CUP 00-31 <33 Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.6 (Commercialllndustrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land IT <e 1 Jnit Type ITnits I Jnlt~ Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 00-31) is: 1.25 Acres x I AU. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per AU. = $64.25 Annual Assessment C-2 CUP 00-31 <gtj f',;;lr,_z.",,""'eW.'r.~" RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ "" <r..,,,'.,........,.,.'''' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO SUMMARILY VACATE AND AUTHORIZE THE SIGNING OF A GRANT DEED FOR RELEASING THE EXCESS PORTIONS OF MILLER AVENUE WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 1-15 FREEWAY AND ETIWANDA AVENUE AS REQUESTED BY CHURCH GARDENS - APN: 227-211-07,28, AND 43 (V-182) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation and authorizing the signing of a grant deed for releasing the excess portions of Miller Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A portion of Miller Avenue was vacated on February 18, 1998, per City Council Resolution No. 98-023 when the City caused Miller Avenue to be realigned following the installation of the 1-15 Freeway. During technical plan check for the American Beauty Parcel Map 15641, it was determined that two small strips of land, 986 square feet and 1,814 square feet, were unaccounted for in the realignment of Miller Avenue. Church Gardens is requesting the vacation of these two small parcels, which are too small to develop on their own and have no real value to the City. Upon vacation of the property, the excess land will become a part ofthe adjacent property currently owned by Church Gardens. On September 12, 2001, the Planning Commission found that said vacations conform to the General Plan and recommended that the vacations occur. Respectfully submitted, ~~ -(1'" William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:sc Attachment <g.5 RESOLUTION NO. O/-2tJCj A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A GRANT DEED FOR RELEASING THE EXCESS PORTIONS OF MILLER AVENUE WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 1-15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (V-182) APN: 227-211-07,28, AND 43 WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess street easements per the description in attached Exhibits "A" and "B" are unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council found by all evidence submitted that the excess easements for Miller Avenue were created in fee to the City and requires a grant deed for releasing the property to the adjacent property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the excess street easements as described in the legal descriptions which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street easements no longer constitute a public easement. SECTION 3: That the City Engineer shall sign the grant deed to release the property to the adjacent property owners. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. <tG. . . ] I 'I' . I 1m S rn: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGtNEERING ntvIsION ,,~ ,<",<V ~"?- ~0 ~<<; ~ ITEM: Miller Avenue Vacation TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: "A" <g7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR "ASSESSORS;SPARCEL 43" THAT pORTION OF VACATED MILLER AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER RESOLUTION NO. 98-023, RECORDED MARCH 4, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19980077876 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 OF THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 412 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED MARCH 4, . 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1998077877 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID coUNTY, SAID EASTERLY LINE IS DESCRIBED IN SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AS HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S 00004'41''W33.00 . FEET. CONTAINS 1,814 SQUARE ~T = 0.042 ACRES :exHIBIT ''E'' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION: . . A~ c-:ft; ;;;4. ;HAMBECK, P.L.S. 6217 UCENSE EXPIRES 3/31/02 3j,z/ZeJo/ DATE. f{I I I I I Number Delta Radius Length Tangent I _ _ Cl 0513'40-.1402.00' 127.B"83.., , ~ ~~ '- -/~__---- _---:~=- MILL-ER_~YEN_UE -J ~ f') .r* ~ Cl I f') [ J * . N89.55'19-.rw2.------~ ~ 123.92' 7 UNE DESCRIBED AS .COURSE NO.1" IN BOOK 8050, PG. 116 O.R. '1"=10( I' , wi =:>' 'Zl w, ~I , <t:1 .0. ZI <t: ..5' ~I .W' I , I , I EXHIBIT "B". . TANGENT DATA SOUTHEASTERLY PROLQNGA TlON OF SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF MILLER AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 84-046252 O.R. . Number 11 L2 Bearing NOOl>4'41"E . NOOl>4'41"E Distance 33.00 31.27 CURVE DATA / cERTIFICATE: of" / coMPLIANcE NO. 412 BLOC}< INS/. NO. OB-rJT1Brr, OR. ~ A<V~ h<l;-4' '?- ..~~ PARCEL 1 H)(H LO-r -J fTJ\;V ANDJ-\ COLONY LANDS .j~ IJ r>?j? /1 'J..ID" ...;......J .:.-...J j' * INDICATES PORTION OF VACATED MILLER AVENUE PER 19980077876 O.R. I .~~e~,~~~In~~ 2m N Qiln 0tIl ()Ml, SJe :m.Smla ..... CA !ll1I:fi-401). ~ ..~ JOB NO. 99097-003 DA TE OF PREP ARA TION: 03 12 01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR "PYRAMID" THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 OF BLOCK "X" OF ETlW ANDA COLONY LANDS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTIlWESTERL Y TERMINUS OF "COURSE NO.1" IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 8050, PAGE 116 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID "COURSE NO. 1" HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 850 37' 41" W 275.02 FEET, SAID NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF VACATED MILLER AVENUE AS PER RESOLUTION NO. 98-023, RECORDED MARCH 4, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19980077876 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S 89055'19" E 123.92 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MILLER AVENUE AS DESCRIBED IN AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-046252 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1402.00 FEET, A LINE RADIAL TO SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEARS S 110 37' 33" W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 103.72 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE PROLONGATION THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40 14' 27" TO A POINT ON SAID "COURSE NO.1"; THENCE N 850 37' 41" W 226.85 FEET ALONG SAID COURSE TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND WAS RELINQUISHED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 9532. PAGE 1648 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINS 986 SQUARE FEET = 0.023 ACRES EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER MY SU'rVISION' A~ r: ~ S~~ECK, P.L.S. 6217 LICENSE EXPIRES 3/31/02 7}O/o' DATE qD EXHIBIT "B" .. . TANGENT DATA ., , , J CURVE DATA ' --. "'-- Number Delta Rodius Length Tangent' I ~ \ --- Cl 04'14'27w 1402.00' 103.72' 51.88' ~ '__ I ~ _ ~ _ -:-=- MILLER_-.AVEN_UEJ n ~ 11 Sl1'37'33.V(JRAQ} . , ~ N8 ~~.,!5' Cl y~lINE DESCRIBED ~ ,'lW=.10 53741 W 275.02' I .COURSE NO. lw ~~~ I . S07'23'15-W I BOOK 8050, PG, 116 VACATED MILLER AVE. (RADY- O.R. I PER 19980077876 / , O.R. .W PARCE:L1 :=>. cERT1FlCATE OF /SLOC}< jj)(jj 'I~' COMPLIANCE NO. 412 ~ > I' 08-~~~O.R / " LOT -J <( / ^'<v I .../ ^'~<(, /,~~0 . o. , ~<<J . f-r J VV J-\NDA ~ I " COLONY~i LJ-\NDS . w' Jl\i r> ?/?/l . I yj..ll..D~ ~ ~ '.l I I I I SOUTHEASTERL Y PROLONGATION OF SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MILLER AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 84-046252 O.R. Number 11 L2 l3 Bearing NOO'04'41.E NOO'04'41.E NB9'55'19.W Distance 33.00' 31.27' 123.92' -... Hall & N>reman, InC. . _.. .. CMI Engineemg , Plantlirog , Surveying , P\IbIic. WorIcs 2W N GdBl am ()Mt, !u8 :ro,SPa ". rA !l27l&401I ' 714/ffiHlilO DATE OF PREP ARA TION: 03 12 01 CJ; JOB NO. 99097...:..00~ THE t'~' ~ ~" RANClIO C I T Y 0 F ~ 'li\'l:\WJE\" ~-~ CUCAMONGA Staff Report DAlE: 10: FROM: BY: SUBIECf: September 19, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF A REQUEST 10 SUMMARILY VACATE 1HE 7111 SIRFET (2OllI SlREEI) BEIWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND DEFR CREEK CHANNEL (APPROXIMATELY 660 FEEf WNG)BYPARAGONDEVFLOPMENTCDRPORATICN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of unused portion of 7th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Deer Creek Channel and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: DR 01-03, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Sharon Circle, was approved by the City Planner on July 12, 2001. One of the conditions of approval is that the Developer must submit a request for the vacation of 7th Street bounded on the north side of the project. Seventh Street is an unpaved street, not been used, approximately 660 feet long. It has a right-of way of 74 feet (30 feet south of the centerline and 44 feet north of the centerline). The vacation is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code since it is not reflected in the circulation element. On September 12, 2001, the Planning Commission found, by minute action, the vacation is consistent with the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, JL:i, ~ + William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:sd Attachments Letter from Paragon development corporation Vicinity Map Exhibit "A" Legal Description , q2.. /{' ~M II Kim Berit Snyder Chief Executive Officer July 17, 2001 PAR AGO N DEVElOPMENT CORP. Mr. Henry Murakoshi Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~' 'il' :l REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT "'ND INVESTMENTS ,',': ..' I,. t, '1 319 EAST PALM DRIVE PLACENTIA CA '.12870 PHONE (7141 986.2444 FAX (714) 986'2445 , , ". RE: Request for Street Vacation 7'0 Street, East of Hermosa Design Review 01-03 WWW.r...RAGONOlvCORr.COM Dear Henry: Thank you for your assistance with regard to the procedures for securing a street vacation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga adjacent to our development project. We have recently received design review approval for DR 01-03 in which completing the street vacation of a portion of 7'" Street (old 20'" Street) adjacent to or property is required. Kindly accept this formal request to prepare a staff report and commence with the street vacation procedure, To facilitate your efforts, I have enclosed the following items: 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) 6.) 7.) 8.) 9.) , Assessor's parcel map identifying the subject area to be vacated. Historic legal research verifying that the land area to be vacated should revert to the current owners of the property. . Current title policy of our site verifying ownership and vesting. Aerial photograph identifying the property in question. Verification of design review approval of DR 01-03 wherein the condition to vacate this component of the street is highlighted. . Exhibit delineating the section of old 20'" Street (7'" Street) to be vacated. Sub-Mea 5 Circulation plan showing no 7'" Street continuation between Hermosa and Center. Figure 111-3 Circulation plan showing no 7'" Street continuation between Hermosa and Center. Exhibit from CCWD regarding their former Loti (now owned by Rancho Pacific). The northerly 44' ofTwentietb Street (7'" Street) reverts to them The southerly 30' reverts to us. I appreciate your assistance and look forward to working with you on this engineering matter. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact either me or my civil engineer, Bob Bell at 714-637-8100. Best regards, 7 End! cc: Bob Bell (RB Engineering) 93 VICINITY MAP 8 th 5 E[T lIi, 'j I) N . PROJECT 51 cj <: "i (}, <: :"C a ::c "'>:: ~ U 0:: Lw C) ~ ::r: 0 ~ ,y.. 0 G:' <..J 6 th 5 EU ----~ ->--.'.. . ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CfLj EXHIBIT A ;! APN 209-231-10 (Rancho Pacific Prop) . Par. North Cucamon M. B. 13/15 .@:" l!Ii'i ' ill'." I I ~ r- l,-20th. - '( ~ ;q If" --------~- ... -.. .;. t , " . .... :"t '00 ~_ _ _ ...-: ~ _ - - "- ,:t,.. _ . . -' . - '- .... ..: I.: . . .. t .: @ I. ~. ..... ~ ..~ ;~, ~ - .Q 10. . :U2.AC PROPOSED DRCDR01-03 ~ ,. ,....- @ .0"(; r - ~ :2:. ~ I I. '" 1 1 4---1 . . , 8. @) 4.S8AC .,!;&A. 15051 . ~ IRA. Pm,- -! - ;;;;;2'015 ~ @} ot. @ 1.S351C 1.5I.AC ff'~ ~,' ,. 511~ C:RCL-E i' I r '-. . . a,,,. .~ '~ ... .~ ' I . , , . - ~if~1~~. ~~' Gt k'~~ I I I +4 ~ ~ If ~~. ~. Par. 4 (is) .. ! Pur. 3 (23). CITYOFRANCHOCUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA. CfS RESOLUTION NO. OJ-2ft) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ,SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OFUNUSED 7lH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of a street and highway as excess right-of-way hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said portions of streets are no longer required for street or highway purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION I: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating said portions of street as shown on May V-181 marked Exhibit "A", on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2. The subject vacation shall be subjectto the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess right-of- way no longer constitutes portions of said street. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. 9(P SHEET 1 OF 2 City of Rancho CucaMonga Vacation of Seventh Street Being 0. portion of the Map of North CucaMonga, In the City of Rancho CucaMonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded In Book 4, Page 8 of Maps, records of said County described as follows. That portion of Seventh Street (forMerly Twentieth Street), 74,00 feet wide, bounded on the \oIest by 0. line parallel with and 44.00 feet Easterly of the centerline of HerMosa Avenue (forMerly Turner Avenue), and bounded on the East by the Easterly line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right-of-way as established per InstruMent No, 82-202093 recorded October 5, 1982, In Official Records, records of said County. Reserving therefroM 0. non-exclusive easeMent In favor of CucaMonga County \010. ter District for sewer purposes described as follows. A 20.00 foot wide strip of land lying 10.00 feet on each side of the centerline of the above- described portion of Seventh Street (forMerly Twentieth Street), bounded on the \oIest by 0. line parallel with and 44.00 feet Easterly of the centerline of HerMosa Avenue (forMerly Turner Avenue), and bounded on the East by the Easterly line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right-of-way as established per InstruMent No. 82-202093 recorded OctOber 5, 1982, In Official Records, records of said County. Also reserving therefrOM 0. non-exclusive easeMent In favor of CucaMonga County \010. ter District for waterline purposes described as follows' A 10,00 foot wide strip of land lying 5.00 feet on each side of 0. line, said line being 15.00 feet Northerly of and parallel with the centerline of the above- descrlloed portion of Seventh Street (forMerly Twentieth Street), Ioounded on the \oIest Ioy 0. line parallel with o.nd 44.00 feet Eo.sterly of the centerline of HerMosa Avenue (forMerly Turner Avenue), and Ioounded on the East by the Easterly line of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right-of-way as established per InstrUMent No. 82-202093 recorded October 5, 1982, In Official Records, records of said County, See Exhllolt 'A' attached hereto and by this reference Made 0. part hereof, R.B. ENGINEERING 3198 N. ASHWOOD STREET ORANGE C,4" 92865 PHONE (714) 637-8100 / Cf' MARK P. PFEILER L.S. 5959 DATE LICENSE EXPIRES 12-31-04 W ::l LL~ 0< W< ZI/1 :JO >-:2 ...Jet: _ w WI I 88' 44' 44' wo :J::> Z~ ~<' <(ffi Z 0:: j2 <(>- '~ffi I :2 15 ~~' 44' 40' 84' POR. BLOCK 76 'to ~ EXHIBIT · A. w.' S SCALE: 1.= 1 00' LOT 1 TR. NO. 7866 M.B. 104/3 .".. "'- 2 ~~a b '" 660' t If: 0'~#~A " II SEVENTH SHEET 2 OF 2 STREET (FORMERLY 20TH STREET) \. I \ I \ I l~ o 8 ~ BLOCK 77 NORTH CUCAMONGA M.B. 4/8 CD tl OF 20.00' WIDE EASEMENT FOR SEWER PURPOSES TO BE RESERVED IN VACATION DOCUMENT. Q) tl OF 10.00' WIDE EASEMENT FOR WATERLINE PURPOSES TO BE RESERVED IN VACATION OOCUMENT. L.EQEND W$~ INDICATES AREA TO BE VACATED MARK . PfEILER LICENSE EXPIRES 12- DATE R.a eIOINEERINO 3198 N. ASHWOOD STREET ORANGE CA 92865 PHONE (714) 637-81 0 >->- 1--< ~3: 01 ULL 00 z,l ~r5 <- zO:: ffi5 <ng: zz <a 1/1 (.) N ~ ~ 3:0 '-~ 0:: . U . w 00:: cj - . '" ~8l . N CIlo '" N LL' o~ I.U . ZO::: :Jo >-0:: :-'w T \. ~ ~ I < ~ I '-" W :J ~ <( Q ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA L!":,,'!"'" 'J' ;:,.i; ,',,"/;:j,:.,.;cY<' ''J'',/.,H<' , ;.J fNCINllRINC DlDARTMlNT StaffReJrn DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer James T. Harris, Associate Engineer, Project Manager ~ AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUP~~ENT NO. 003-M TO THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420 COVERING IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS INSTALLATION AT 19TH STREET AND JASPER STREET RECOMMENDATION: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: It is recommended that the City Council approve the execution of Program Supplement No. 003-M to Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The In-Roadway Warning Lights project at 19th Street and Jasper Street qualifies for Federal Hazard Elimination Safety funding. The funds are administered by the Department of Transportation Design and Local Programs and, therefore, the City must execute a supplement to the existing Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420. Respectfully submitted, ~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer ~ WJO:JTH:ls Attachment: Vicinity Map qq :.s. < Jt l j a Ui NO SCALE HAlfTHORNE ST RZ Co2 < SPEtD c: % = w UIolIT g.. po: 45 g.. w < en rn < $= ...... ~ 19TH STREET (SR-3D) ~ \J ~. EXIST SCHOOL . RZ CROSSWALK t; SPUD Iii Z UI.IIT CALA AV toO ... 45 < .., - g.. lol a z f- a:: ... t.l PROJEGr LOCATIO~ ILUIILTON ST LEGEND: ill EXIST ROADSIOE SICN JASPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ( 'I ~ EXIST ROADSIDE SICN 1I0UNTED ON' EXIST CANTILEVER FlASHINC BEACONS FIGURE "A" {lJb RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SiaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 19, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer INITIATION OF FORMATION PROCEEDINGS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 FOR TRACTS 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROUTE 30 BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND HANLEY AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685,LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions initiating and declaring its intent to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 10, approving the Assessment Engineer's Report and setting the date of the public hearing for October 3, 2001. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tracts 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 and 15902 comprise the "University" portion of the previously proposed "University/Crest" development. The University/Crest Project Planned Development was previously subject to land use entitlements resulting from the County of San Bernardino's approval in 1991 of PUD No. W121-49. On October 26, 1999, the County approved revisions to the University/Crest PD, including separating the University portion of the University/Crest PD from the Crest portion. Subsequent to City-initiated litigation regarding the project that challenged the proper review of environmental impacts and lack. of conformity with the City's land use and zoning laws, the City and Property Owner resolved their differences and memorialized such in a Settlement, Pre-Annexation and Tolling Agreement, dated June 27,2000. As a condition of entering into the Settlement and Pre-Annexation Agreement, the City and Property Owner agreed to enter into a Development Agreement that was ultimately executed on September 6, 2000, via the City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 621. jO/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT INTENTION OF FORMATION PROCEEDINGS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 0 SEPTEMBER 19,2001 PAGE 2 One provision of the Development Agreement requires the formation of the necessary Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts for the Revised University Project development, subsequently renamed the Rancho Eitwanda development. The parties involved agreed that the LMD's must be established no later than the recordation of the final tract map. As it had been previously determined that existing landscape maintenance districts could not accommodate the amount of publicly maintained landscaping required of the Rancho Etiwanda development, the Property Owner, in preparation of the recordation of associated tract maps, has petitioned the City Council to form Landscape Maintenance District NO.1 O. The boundary of proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 generally encompasses the area north of State Route 30, between Day Creek Channel and Hanley Avenue, extending northerly to the city limits. The exact boundary is detailed on the accompanying exhibit. The District will be formed with Tracts 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 and 15902. Additional tracts within this district boundary will be annexed at the time of recordation. The Assessment Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 is on file in the City Clerk's office. Assessment ballots will be mailed September 20, 2001. The proposed public hearing date is October 3, 2001. Respectfully Submitted, ~M William J. O'Neil -foY City Engineer WJO:rl /DL- B 9 ~ ~ l!lil !Ii i ~ o o '" ~l LM[~ 1 Banyal 51 B Exhibit A - / ~ # ----- 23/1 St 1\ ::~~f~ II~\ ,. "I WlsonAve lR 14496 ?I <1: -1Jj '" W h,,- Ili III I r== ~~. PlI!k -;::;: JOmtt Ave 74' lIT c:r T I I mal EEEBB '=III :ili 1.~ <: ...... r HnhlandAve =11111 -< s ~ I o mHI '-- I dt Proposed Boundaries of Landscape rvlaintenance District No. 10 - - - - - - - - - I N + /D3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. OJ-2It A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 200112002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE Xlll 0 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION; AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby proposes to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of land within such district to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 3 hereof for the fiscal year commencing July I, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") and as provided by Article XlII 0 of the California Constitution. Section 2. The general location and boundaries of the district (the "District") are shown on maps on file in the office of the City Clerk, are incorporated herein by reference, and open to public inspection. The designation of the Assessment District is as follows: Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10. Section 3. The proposed improvements may be briefly described as follows: the operation, maintenance and servicing of ornamental structures, landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, drainage devices and drywells located in public places within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, /~tf Resolution No. September 19, 2001 Page 2 spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal oftrimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of the ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities, and water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities: Section 4. The City Council hereby designates MuniFinancial, a Willdan Company as the Engineer for the purposes of these proceedings and orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk a written report in accordance with Article XIII 0, Section 4 of the California Constitution and Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the Act for Fiscal Year 200112002 commencing July 1, 2001and ending June 30, 2002. Such Report shall refer to the District by its distinctive designation. Section 5. Lots or parcels within the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local or regional governmental entity, the State of California or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of September, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: William J. Alexander Mayor ATTEST: Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk Approved as to form: James Markman, City Attorney /b5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. DhJ../d.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARlL Y APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 200112002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIll 0 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section I. The City Council, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") and as provided by Article XIll 0 of the California Constitution, by its previous Resolution No. initiated proceedings for the approval of the formation of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (the "Assessment District"), as described on maps of the Assessment District on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within such District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 and ordered the Engineer, MuniFinancial, a Willdan Company, to prepare and file a written report in accordance with Article XIll 0, Section 4 of the California Constitution and Article 4 of Chapter I of the Act. Section 2. The Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council such report entitled "Engineer's Report, City Of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10" (the "Report") which pertains to the Assessment District. Section 3. The City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Report, and the Report is hereby approved as filed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of September, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: /{)fc Resolution No. September 19, 2001 Page 2 ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Approved as to form: James Markman, City Attorney ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor //)7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 0/...213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 200112002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII 0 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section I. By its previous Resolution No. , the City Council initiated proceedings pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (the "Act") and as provided by Article XIII 0 of the California Constitution, for the approval of the formation of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10, (the "Assessment District") described on maps on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within such Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 and ordered the Engineer, MuniFinancial, a Willdan company, to prepare and file a written report in accordance with Article XIII 0, Section 4 of the California Constitution and Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act. The Engineer has prepared and filed a written report (the "Report") with the City Clerk, which pertains to the Assessment District, and by previous resolution, the City Council approved the Engineer's Report. Section 2. The City Council hereby (I) finds that the public interest and convenience requires and (2) declares its intention to order the approval for the formation and to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within such District for that portion of the fiscal year commencing July 1,2001 and ending June 30, 2002 to pay the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 3. If the assessments proposed by this resolution are approved by the property owners pursuant to a mailed ballot election conducted in accordance with Article XIII 0 of the California Constitution, the City Council in subsequent fiscal years may thereafter impose the assessment at any rate or amount that is less than or equal to the amount authorized for Fiscal Year 2001/2002, increased each year based upon the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for the San Bernardino-Anaheim- Riverside Area ("CP1"), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, or its successor without conducting another mailed ballot election. The Engineer shall compute the percentage of difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage I~g Resolution No. September 19, 2001 Page 2 for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of L!lbor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer. shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Section 3. The proposed improvements may be briefly described as follows: the operation, maintenance and servicing of ornamental structures, landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, drainage devices and drywells located in public places within the boundaries of the District. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the irrigation and operation of the ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities, and water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. Section 4. The general location and boundaries of the District are shown on maps on file in the office of the City Clerk, are incorporated herein by reference, and open to public inspection. The designation of the Assessment District is as follows: Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No.1 O. Section 5. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report, on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Section 6. Notice is hereby given that Wednesday, the 3m day of October, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729, is the time and place fixed for a public hearing by the City Council on the question of the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 against lots and parcels of land within the District. At the hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. Procedures of the City applicable to the completion, return and tabulation of the ballots required pursuant to Article XlII 0, Section 4 of the California Constitution are on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the public hearing as set forth in Section 6 in accordance with law. 1~9 Resolution No. September 19, 2001 Page 3 Section 8. The City Council hereby designates William J. O'Neil, telephone number (909) 477-2740, to answer inquiries regarding the hearing, protest proceedings, and procedural or technical matters. Section 9. Lots or parcels within the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local or regional governmental agency, the State of California or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of September, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABST AlN: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Approved as to form: James Markman, City Attorney lib RANCHO ><; . c U C A M 0 N G A ;'0\S ,.">.:,")ti?,,,"',/>dif.,;.'ni.>l,,;';....., ",..,..., ,...~.,J:.:\.; )((;)')';';;';';:1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DAlE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer ,f6 BY: SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-10, SUBMITTED BY EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. (WALGREEN'S), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for CUP 99-10, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 99-10, located on the southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. . Developer: Evergreen Devco, Inc. (Walgreen's) 2920 East Camelback Road Phoenix, AZ 85016 Release: Accept: Faithful Performance Bond Maintenance Bond 88B-296930 88B-322666 $9,000.00 $ 900.00 Respectfully submitted, ftJ.. ~ ...J... . William J. O'Neil V""- City Engineer 11/ 0-' .. J 191M ST. PR~""'e.!> ST. 1...~"1"'>. 'Z EA. ~ .. z !of u rTTTTTTl .. NORTII pt.lo SCAL.E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt'\10NGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~ TITLE:~ EXHIBIT: A A_? RESOLUTION NO. ~Jdf! 0\ -"d- \5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 99-10, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. //3 THE CITY OF I ' , . . ':; 7- ,"'...':Y"'.~.. < ~ ;~'fiiTi:;<>;;:ft~.-. RANCUO CUCAMONGA ".....'..""....y:''(.:_,"...;-...'- ',J Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Shonda Bello, Planning Aide SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION - J.L. WALKER - An application to designate the Krysto Ranch House and property as a Historic Landmark, and a request to file a Notice of Exemption under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Historic Landmark Designation for the Krysto Ranch, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue, as unanimously recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission on August 8, 2001, and file a Notice of Exemption per the CEQA Guidelines. BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS: This item was continued from the City Council meeting of September 5, 2001, in order for the applicant to be present for questions. This structure is significant both historically and architecturally. It is also connected with some of the most prominent residents of the loamosalAlta Loma Community. The original owners were Dr. Theodore Krysto (Krystopovitch) and his family. Dr. Krysto served as Minister of Agriculture for Czar Nicholas II, and while serving in this position, he came to learn of a brewing revolution. With this knowledge, and at the suggestion of Captain Peter Demens, Dr. Krysto moved his family to loamosa. The Krysto family home was built by Ted, one of the Krysto's sons, around 1912. The home remains as it was originally constructed. Ted is also responsible for many of the homes in the Alta Loma Community. He is also credited with such buildings as the Alta Loma Fire Hall and Alta Loma Honor Roll, which are both Historic Landmarks, and are both located on Amethyst Avenue. IIi( CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER September 19, 2001 Page 2 The Vai brothers, James and John (Giovanni), purchased the 144-acre Alta Loma winery, as well as Bonded Winery NO.1 by silent bid in 1930. This purchase allowed the Vai brothers to own all methods of production for their wine tonic, which was bottled under the Padre label. The Vai brothers continued to live on the property at 5917 Archibald Avenue until the mid 1950s. The site follows a 7-8 percent grade, and comprises only 1.78 acres of the original 144-acre site. Very Low density housing (1-2 dwellings per acre) immediately surround the subject site. The home retains its setting due to the large setback from Archibald Avenue to the west, as well as a fieldstone wall ranging in height from 6 to 18 inches. This house incorporates prominent details from the Arts and Crafts Movement, especially the Prairie and Monterey Styles, as well as masonry construction that was popular in the early 1900s. STAFF CONTACT: Staff has received several phone calls from residents inquiring as to the significance of a home becoming a Historic Designated Landmark. They also voiced concerns regarding the potential commercial use of the property, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. During the Historic Preservation Commission meeting, a representative from the law offices of James De Aguilera (representing Citizens for Responsible Planning and Neighborhood Preservation, an unincorporated association) presented testimony in opposition to the Historic Landmark Designation (The Project) request. The attorney's representative submitted a letter (Exhibit "C") requesting The Commission to deny the project because the environmental determination (categorical exemption) was not appropriate for this project. The representative claimed that because a conditional use permit application was pending, an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared in order to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It was noted that no Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted. Under CEQA the decision making body (City Council) should make a determination based on the information presented before them during the public hearing. The information and the project presented before this City Council is only a Historic Landmark Designation. Therefore, the Categorical Exemption recommended by City staff is the appropriate environmental document for the Historic Landmark Designation. To date, staff has received no application for a Conditional Use Permit. Please see the attached letter from the applicant (Exhibit "D"), which indicates they are currently not applying for a Conditional Use Permit. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared, and is attached for reference, as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. 115 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER September 19,2001 Page 3 BB:LHlls Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report, dated August 8,2001 Exhibit"B" - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes, dated August 8, 2001 Exhibit"C" - Citizens for Responsible Planning and Neighborhood Preservation letter, dated August 2, 2001 Exhibit"D" - Letters from applicant, dated August 15, and September 5, 2001 Exhibit"E" - Letters from neighbors opposing the project Exhibit "F" - Notice of Exemption Resolution of Approval lib . . THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA l'iNiiI\',_ Staff Report DATE: August 8, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Shonda Bello, City Planning Aide SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER - An application to designate the Krysto Rancho House and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15. BACKGROUND: A. Historical Sianificance: The land and structure known as the "Krysto Ranch," located at 5917 Archibald Avenue, has been connected with not only some of the most prominent residents of the 10mosalAlta Loma Community, but also with one of the biggest mysteries to take place in the Alta Loma Community (Exhibit "A"). Dr. Theodore Krysto (Kystopovitch), a man of noble birth and friend to Czar Nicholas II, was responsible for moving the Krysto family to the loamosa area. While serving as Czar's Minister of Agriculture, Dr. Krysto heard rumors of a brewing revolution. With this threat looming, Dr. Krysto moved his family to Hawaii. After some time (exact dates not known), and at the suggestion of Captain Demens, the Krysto's once again moved, this time to loamosa. The family purchased a ranch south of Captain Demens's property on the east side of Archibald Avenue, where Dr. Krysto, his wife, and seven children lived from 1886 to about 1925. Ted, one of the Krysto's son's, was a well-known carpenter and builder. He is responsible for such buildings as the Alta Loma Fire Hall and Alta Loma Honor Roll, which are both located on Amethyst Avenue. Ted Krysto is also responsible for many of the homes in the Alta Loma Community, including the family home he built for his parents on the Krysto Ranch about 1912 (Exhibit "C"). '11 Aside from being linked to a family of noble birth and outstanding community involvement, this home also played a role in one of the biggest mysteries to take place in Alta Loma. The mystery is set during the Prohibition and Gangster Eras. The 18th Amendment to the Constitution and the Volstead Act made the importing, exporting, transportation, selling, II 1/1 . . HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER August 8, 2001 Page 2 and manufacturing of intoxicating liquor illegal; however, alcohol used for "medicinal" and/or "sacramental" purposes were excluded from this Amendment. With these "loopholes" left open, the time was right for an explosive increase in crime, especially organized crime and mysterious disappearances. Frank Baumgarteker, owner of Western Grape Products, and his partner Robert Demateis purchased the 144-acre ranch in Alta Loma, as well as a ranch in Ontario and a winery located on 8th Street (now known as the Biane Winery). Frank, his wife Mary, and their son Herbert moved into the Alta Loma Ranch. Mr. Baumgarteker commuted between Los Angeles and the 144-acre Alta Loma ranch every week. He would conduct business in Los Angeles and return home to Alta Loma to spend the weekend with his wife and son. During one of these trips, Mr. Baumgarteker disappeared, and was later reported to be a victim of foul play. After Mr. Baumgarteker's disappearance, the companies and properties were auctioned off. The Vai brothers, James and John (Giovanni) purchased the site and associated businesses through a silent bid, and continued to live at 5917 Archibald Avenue until the mid 1950s. (For additional information, see Exhibit "A.") B. Site Characteristics: The site follows a 7-8 percent grade, and comprises only 1.78 acres of the original 144-acre site. Very Low density housing units (1-2 dwelling per acre) immediately surround the subject site. The home retains its setting due to the large setback from Archibald Avenue to the west, as well as a wall ranging in height from 6 to 18 inches. ANALYSIS: A. General: The house located at 5917 Archibald Avenue is square in plan, is a two-story wood and fieldstone structure resting on a raised basement. In addition, a secondary structure is located to the northeast. The foundation and first floor exterior walls are constructed of fieldstone, and the second story is sheathed with wide clapboard siding. The roof is low-pitched gable with widely overhanging eves. A second story balcony is present along the south side of the structure, which is cantilevered and covered by principal roof. A wood shingle roof caps the main unit. The front steps are constructed of poured concrete and flanked by fieldstone retaining walls that are approximately 2 feet tall. The front windows are of casement design with hinge openers. The six-paneled wooden front door is of classical design, topped with a rectangular transom, and is recessed from the wall. Decorative entablature (cornice frieze and architrave), and architrave trip are flush with the exterior wall. A fieldstone chimney is centered on the west elevation. The secondary structure is one story, located to the northeast of the main unit, and is rectangular in plan. The exterior walls are constructed of fieldstone, casement windows are present, and the roof is low-pitched gable, capped with wood shake roof. Eucalyptus trees on the west property line border the property. These trees served as windbreaks, which protected the structure and vineyards during windstorms, as well as serving as property boundaries. The trees act as a reminder of agricultural history of the 1/<1 . . HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER August 8, 2001 Page 3 10mosalAlta Loma Community. The integrity of the house is intact, with no architectural changes visible. This house incorporates prominent details from the Arts and Crafts Movement, especially the Prairie and Monterey Styles, as well as masonry construction that was popular in the early 1900s. B. Landmark Desianation: The subject site and structure certainly qualify for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical, cultural, architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the "Facts for Finding" section. The requested designation area includes the subject lot, residence, and rows of Eucalyptus trees along Archibald Avenue. C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 1.d of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Sianificance: Findina 1: FacVs: FacVs: Findina 2: FacVs: Findina 3: FacVs: Findina 4: FacVs: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. The property identifies a historic period of the early 1900s when a large number of Russians emigrated from Russia due to civil and political unrest. The property identifies with the Prohibition Era. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common but is now rare. The residence retains the architectural character of the Arts and Crafts Movement, especially the Prairie Style. There is evidence of masonry construction that was popular in the early 1900s. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. The landmark eligible property is approximately 88 years old. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important, and/or a local personality. The property was owned by Dr. Krysto, a prominent member of the Alta Loma Community. 1/1 . . HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369-J.L. WALKER August 8, 2001 Page 4 Fact/s: Findino 5: Fact/s: Fact/s: The property was owned by Frank Baumgarteker, a well-known businessman from Los Angeles. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. The residence and rows of Eucalyptus trees are reminiscent of the wine industry and ranching that was once a common business and use for land. The residence identifies a period of time when it was fashionable for the state's wealthy to own and live in "the country," as well as own a house in "the city." B. Historic Architectural and Enoineerino Sionificance: Findino 1: Fact/s: Findino 2: Fact/s: The construction materials and/or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual, significant, and/or uniquely effective. The engineering methods such as the second story balcony, which is cantilevered and covered by principal roof is unusual and uniquely effective in keeping the character of the structure. The fieldstone facing is a unique material, and is not usually found in architecture and engineering of today's homes. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, and/or its details and materials are beautiful and/or unusual. The fieldstone facing, as well as the Arts and Crall Movement designs are beautiful. They are not common in the homes of today. c. Neiohborhood and Geooraohic Settino: Findino 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The immediate vicinity of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road exhibits three other historical resources; the Demens Tolstoy House, the Grandma Issak House, and the Toews House to the north. The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of architectural, trends throughout the Alta Loma area in the early 1900s, and historical continuity of the neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Fact/s: IZD . . HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER August 8, 2001 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission adopt the attached Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation DRC2001-00369, and recommend approval by the City Council for Landmark Designation. Respectfully Submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SB/jc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Mysterious Disappearance Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Photograph of residence Exhibit "D" - Photograph of rock wall Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation DRC2001-00369 /2/ . . "MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE" The 18th Amendment to the Constitution and the Volstead Act made the importing and exporting, transportation, selling, and manufacturing of intoxicating liquor illegal; however, alcohol used for "medicinal" and/or "sacramental" purposes was excluded from this Amendment. With these "loopholes" left open, the time was right for an explosive increase in crime, especially organized crime. According to Clifford Walker, author of One Eve Closed, the Other Red, Frank Baumgarteker owned Union Motor Transport Company, as well as half ownership of Western Grape Products, Bonded Winery NO.1. Western Grape Products was capable of producing $50,000 per day. Baumgartekers's business partner was Robert Demateis, son of a respectable Italian winemaker. The elder Demateis owned San Gabriel Winery, and along with Segundo Guasti, planted hundreds of acres of grapes in the San Gabriel and San Bernardino valleys. Unfortunately, the younger Demateis did not follow in his father's honorable footsteps. It is said that he "would rather make 50 cents illegally than one dollar legally," As a favor to his elder friend, Mr. Baumgarteker took Robert on as a junior partner in Western Grape Products, a decision that may have had a hand in his own disappearance. After Mr. Baumgarketeker took Robert on as a partner, alcohol and wine strangely came up short, and back doors of storage rooms were found pried open. The Cucamonga Winery, also part of the purchase of Western Grape Products, was one of only a few California wineries licensed and bonded by the Federal Government to produce alcoholic beverages. As a federally bonded winery, it was under constant government scrutiny. This license and bonding by the Federal Government is yet another reason this business was highly desirable. In addition to producing wine, they also sold 5.gallon cans of grape syrup with the directions, "Do not open or add water, or it will ferment and cause wine." It was common for Mr. Baumgarteker to spend the weekend with his family in Alta Loma, and then travel to Los Angeles where the headquarters of his businesses were located for the week. It was during one of these trips to Los Angeles that Mr. Baumgarteker disappeared. Prior to this trip to Los Angeles, three known mafia men, Jack Dragna, Joe Ardizoone, and Eddie Rollings were known to have visited the winery. These men were known members of the Los Angeles Branch of the La Cosa Nostra Italian Mafia. At the time, Dragna was the "Don" (head of the family) and Ardizzone was the "Under boss" (second in command) of the Los Angeles Family. These men told Mr. Baumgarteker to relinquish control of Bonded Winery No. 1 and be a rich man, or be eliminated. He kept this threat from his wife, Mary Quint Baumgarteker; however, she knew something was wrong. When she questioned him, he told her of the threat and gave her the names of the men that visited him, and told her that should he not return home after one of his trips to give their names to Buran Fitts, the Los Angeles District Attorney. The Los Angeles Times, dated November 28, 1930, Clifford Walker's book, One Eve Closed. the Other Red, and James Hofer's Master's Thesis, Cucamonaa Wines and Vines all report the same sequence of events. EXHIBIT "A" /22 . . MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE - EXHIBIT "A" August 8, 2001 Page 2 On Monday, November 25,1929, Mr. Baumgarteker traveled to Los Angeles for a meeting with his business partner, Robert Demateis, and Attorney Walter Haas. At this meeting, which took place at Hoffman's Cafe on 7th Street in downtown Los Angeles, a contract was discussed that would allow Demateis to remove 40,000 gallons of wine from the Cucamonga Winery to a local wine tonic establishment. After the luncheon meeting, Mr. Baumgarteker bid his business associates goodbye, and headed for his car, a dark purple Cadillac Phaeton that was parked on a Los Angeles street a few blocks away. That was the last sighting of Mr. Baumgarteker or his car. The car was later found in San Diego covered in red dust, similar to that found in the Julian area. Friends of the merchant disclosed to police that bootleggers had attempted several times to approach Mr. Baumgarteker. It was intimated that efforts might have been made to frighten him into disposing of wine to them. It is also interesting that the Vai Brothers, James and John (Giovanni) purchased the Federally Bonded Winery, the 144-acre Alta Loma Ranch, and the 400,000 gallons of wine stored at the winery by silent bid, approximately 1 year after Mr. Baumgarteker's disappearance. This purchase allowed the Vai Brothers to own all methods of production for their wine tonic, which they bottled under the Padre label. According to the book written by Clifford Walker, the Vai brothers were "on the fringe of gangster," and were not the most reputable or even the highest bidders, yet they were authorized to buy the winery. According to newspaper articles of the period, it was decided that Mr. Baumgarteker was "taken for a ride" by gangsters who had been angered by Mr. Baumgarteker's refusal to participate in a liquor racket. As cited in the Los Angeles Times Newspaper dated November 30, 1930, a skeleton was found in the Mojave Desert. Though severely decayed when found, the skeleton was slight of stature, and also had a few wisps of hair and remnants of clothing that indicated it was the body of Mr. Baumgarteker. The Vai Brothers continued to live at the residence and run the Padre Winery until the mid-1950s. The winery continued operating under the management of Cesare Vai, a nephew of the Vai brothers, under the new name Cucamonga Vineyard Company until the 1970s. According to Walker's book, the rest of the story is unwritten and unpublished. One newspaper reporter, who allegedly worked for the Los Angeles Times, continued to push for answers and published his findings in the paper. This reporter was killed when a bomb exploded on his front porch. The name of the newspaper reporter has not yet been located, due to the format of newspaper articles at that time. 1.23 . . 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE-300' RADIUS MAP - , '. ~ 'I I ' I ' U L t-' 'I ... .. I ~... I .1 >1 I ----~~~ ", ( '" ,', ) 1 I ' i I 1__._1 c::: -,....-----. -- ,. ..; _:~-.--,.--"-' ~-.:"'--.--~---~l ~ L---.-.---t~--.....-"--. 1--------1\-----1 t ' - .. ... .::j __L____ . ~..L'__'I .. . . I ! \ f-_.___~ 1 .~..T,,,_____-:-- ,.... .. ..... I '---.---...-..----.....- . I , , ;' -I L I c/.I -'--"-', I ' , z . _,,' } ,'I ,",:_"', . -----r- -,' - ,.! "/ l--.-_ i COTTONWOOD g c.....:~----'" r-~---i--~-1 \ i ! f 1 ".- .,' .'. '.)' /< .-.--1 r .---c-T. .- a:: ~ t 1 ' I I I ,- ., '1..1~.. - -- ________~__1 ,I I / i / "'" I. .. ai ~. ------ , ~ Ed' I 'I ,!! '.. I ~ ..J ,I 'f! /. .>,. . ---.--- _~___. - ------- ,--.----.----'-----!!. ! I .' .. ~ . 1 I I > I / T' -:.!. / / .. \ .... "---..----+--.. I ! / )\, ..'...'/,/. ,/ ., '\_____-----1 .'-,. II 11 -- ['7-----' l---------------1 I ' /,. '. J - , I I / I I <c.--_______ '. I , , o'. 1/' , ~' . I L J;../ ! " \ i L__. __ I, . . I ---~. L_____j --- -~i -- --; - ) . /._ \1", I \ 'J -1 ~..-;- .--- -(MA~--~NITA:. - I i J, J ! I ,,' r ..---1 .! ... /) '. I' I .. /.--./ '. -., - h ------..1 1 I i '\ ' ,<.I :1 " ", / . -:-..~..,,-,~. . ,/' '. '<', - I, l ' J I ''i \ - ._.1. - . _l"l . \ I i : / -~/~", ._ I j/" ' .~. ''--'--______ I I ' I" / ~(u<. / ..... \r 1 l__ ___.L____ _L___-"-- __ J / -' /~~. ",,, /./ .~\ '.. 1_ MANZANITA__ - r" ; I,,, ------~..~--- ----.-r-. - - J ... 1 . r- I 1 ' r - ./. " " ... ;.;:--:"':--~... ,... . I I. '/ . / . ;" ./ . / ... . I. I . . -",,/ /.. .... .. . J. . . -.... .. I .1 . , E ,_", ' ,I "./; . ,I ______-, , 1 ' .; v ,,/,. "--1.. ..' I I I. />,/ / \ ,Ii> .... . .... ... ..=1..... "___,__~L_:__L I I I ' .' ,._.1 --, /.. _~___."~J ...---_..---.- . ., ~=--~r-~~~~-.~--j //. /\ __--\ \ - . ~~OL6!..,,(. . .. ......... ........ .......1 . .... ..... ........\\ . I ) , ,,---- I. ... ~--~~ 1.________-__ -.. ' I \ '. I '-------c--:- 'I r.. .. ..'-'. .\ I' ../ ", \/ . .\' . /.... . . I ..----.~... .. I' ." \'. 'I. '. -~. ....,.,- . - ..-{ 1 --, \\ ,..>[~------j I l ,~"~."_.,J [~-.. .1.. I I . / \ -'-'-"'--~-- ", i "l ".' t :>.. -.-..,.,.--....:....., -"-,- '. -- .. I I., " I .. . .I------------~-\ ..L.-.;L.--?~__._--\ i--__.--.-----)--~---::~:.J--~-- -~~---- ~/ .----':::.\. <-___, ,[..... .. \ . / I... I i I I ' ./-... -..... (----------- / i-------~ 1 I ., , k'.' .'/>(;'<. .. I'. , I ~.--.--------~.--.--.~.."---I I I J 1 I -.../- ...'IQQ.f'.'. . .---. I. r I ,_.. ,./., , '.! 1 . I i I i ~'.., /.,' J".>,.,,- ..''.. -I L."__.".' _~._~_-,____._I )_, ' . _' ,..---~~-1 ____+__~ ,',::. ''7'>~ / . / .,}.......... "'<.J "'I.. +-.1 ...1 Z;I'----------~.-. -----------I,J . I T, - I >- . . ...-<.,.../ 'I' . ./.."-- ~ 1....1 I r ill -- - . '>- :I> ,.Ic, I. ,> --------'--, 0, C_~_ --~- X . /7 1.-..----...-'00 ., '0. I...J' Z __ . / / !j; I , I ;;:: L_______'_..I_~____'_-J m I.A' \ I I . / /. ()'~---------:1 >1 .. . i=i\ .....1. \-.. J I . / ~ - , . I! . - . im -,~------~ co ;' "', .-----' a:: " /. , ."-.-.-- -----..-. .1 z ., I '.O.C ^ .-- -i ' . , - ------, " :l . m l..---.-J ... \ r"---"f.---------~j _________J B' //-1.. .110 . I 1----.------..---1'. , I I I "" I - I ' . ! i: 'LI.",I i '," I 'I i '.--.-. __..___L____c~.___.. - I I <./ .. ... 1 I' ..., ...rH '-,.___-'_.,. ",. .. .1 If" ..' .. !'-------- I--~--- Jl SH1 AlE ,---.- I 'r--"-- , - . ~1 'i. .1' , . I I / ill , !. ( . , !' I ' I ' ~ ~ ,.. . tI ,.. . -r - 0'_ - 2800 Fee~ N 2400 2000 1200 800 - N -..c::. o . . "e" - ~Exhibit . . "D" -Exhibit N ~ . . DRAFT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 8, 2001 Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: John Mannerino STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer; Salvador Salazar; Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Secretary; Shonda Bello, Planning Aide; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Debra Meier, Contract Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner ***** ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made at this time. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Macias, carried -4-0-1 (Mannerino absent), to approve the minutes of July 25, 2001. ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS A. LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - JOSEPH AND J. L. WALKER - An application to designate the Krysto Ranch House and property as a Historic Landmark. located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15. Shonda Bello, Planning Aide gave the staff report. Chairman McNiel asked if there were any comments or questions on the report. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that Ms. Bello did an exceptional job on researching the \ , historical information for the report. 8 II /Z7 . . DRAFT Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing and explained that the item before the Commission is a Landmark Designation for the purpose of preserving the historical integrity of the structure and that no other applications have been submitted for the property to date. Annette DeBellefaille, P.O. Box 1853, Lake Arrowhead, stated she was speaking on behalf of the Citizens for Responsible Planning and Neighborhood Preservation, also represented by the law offices of James D. Aguilera. She presented a sealed letter from James D. Aguilera to the Secretary for the record. Ms. DeBellefaille then reviewed the concerns noted in the letter including Mr. Aguilera's contention that the City staff is fully aware of the applicants intenT to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of using the property commercially. She noted the Very Low Residential zoning and that designated historical structures can be used for "other than" residential purposes, SUbject to a Conditional Use Permit. She indicated that City staff is helping the owners "jump start" a commercial property to get around a residential use. She contended that the CEQA categorical exemption does not apply because of the City's prior knowledge of the applicant's intent to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a non-residential use. She added that neighbors have complained about noise, traffic and parking associated with receptions held on the property. She stated that their association educates elected officials about CEQA requirements to ensure the statute is followed and supports historic preservation and seeks to avoid encroachment of noncompatable uses into residential neighborhoods. She claimed that an EIR is required now and asked that the Historic Landmark Designation be declined for the time being until Mr. Aguilera's letter is reviewed and that the issue be discussed with the City's legal counsel. Hearing no further comment, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the matter of the Landmark Designation is sent to the City Council as a recommendation and that City Council will make the final determination. He added that the Code requires findings with respect to that designation, which are found both in the staff report and resolution regarding the history, architecture and prior use of the structure. He added that the Historic Preservation Commission only makes a determination as to whether the structure meets those criteria and that iffuture applications are made, then those applications will be considered at that time. He explained that the applicant is not required to submit all applications at one time and that staff is not aware of other applications at this time and no other applications have been submitted. He noted that the property does qualify for the exemption for the Landmark Designation action under the CEQA guidelines. He added that if and when applications for an alternate use are submitted, then the use will have to be independently analyzed for CEQA. Chairman McNiel asked of the Designated Historic Landmarks in the City, how many are used for commercial purposes. HPC Minutes -2- August 8, 2001 Il~ - . . Ms. Bello responded that 6 or 7 of the 65 sites are used commercially, approximately 10 percent. Chairman McNiel stated that based upon his experience, the designation of a property as a Historic Landmark does not necessarily mean it will then be approved for a commercial use. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that until project applications are received, the only matter before the Commission is the Landmark Designation and that staff has explained the meaning of the designation to the applicant and that they are aware that altemate uses are available under that designation, but that is considered a separate matter. He added that the Commission would pursue the designation status because of the facts presented, but that any other uses for the property will be within the purview of the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing and concurred that because of the history and data provided about the property, it certainly qualifies for Landmark Designation. Commissioner Tolstoy added that when the owners of the DemensfTolstoy house requested a commercial use they were turned down and that the Landmark Designation does not guarantee approval for another use. Brad Buller explained that if any applications for other uses are received, the surrounding residents to the property will be noticed and the meetings will be open to the public. He added that a neighborhood meeting would also be held and that staff, the Commission, and the City Council cares about the concerns of the residents surrounding the property and that public input is vital. He noted that because of the agricultural heritage of the City, structures like this one are often found scattered around in residential neighborhoods. Kevin Ennis emphasized that the action is a recommendation and that City Council makes the final action. Brad Buller added what a pleasure it has been to have Shonda Bello working with us as a Planning Aide. She has been an asset to the Planning Division, especially with her work on historical issues. Motion: Moved by Macias, seconded by Stewart, carried - 4-0-1 (Mannerino absent), to approve the recommendation for the "Krysto House" as a Historic Landmark and for the item to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ***** DIRECTOR'S REPORTS B. ANNUAL UPDATE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES - Oral report. Shonda Bello, Planning Aide gave a Power Point presentation highlighting the activities of the Historic Planning Commission this past year. HPC Minutes -3- August 8, 2001 l20q . . Commissioner Tolstoy voiced his appreciation for her work on historical projects and asked who would take her place when she leaves for school. Chairman McNiel echoed appreciation for her hard work and invited her to return when she finishes school. ***** PUBLIC COMMENTS No additional comments were made at this time. ***** ADJOURNMENT The Historic Preservation Commission adjoumed to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary HPC Minutes -4- August 8, 2001 J3D . games (])~ilera . COUNSELOR AND ATTORNEY AT LAW 2068 ORANGE TREE LANE I SUITE 218 I REDLAND~~~~\2374 I (909) 307-5750 I FACSIMILE (909) 307-5755 Honorable Historic Preservation Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga clo City Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 08 2001 RECEIVED - PLANNING Re: APN: 201-152-15 Dear Honorable Historic Preservation Commission: This office represents Citizens for Responsible Planning and Neighborhood Preservation, an unincorporated association. I have been asked to review and comment on the proposed Historical Landmark Designation for the property located at 5917 Archibald Avenue, the "Krysto Rancho House". 1 have been advised by your planning staff that the designation of the property (structure) as an historic landmark is an initial step to consider permitting the property. pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit, to be used for weddings, wedding receptions, and banquets; activities other than residential uses. The planning staff advised me that the property owner has told the City that this is their intention. See ~ declaration which is attached hereto. This property is located in the Very Low Density residential zoning district. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code at section 17.08.020 describes this District as intended for "Very Low Density Single Family Residential Uses". Development Code Section 17.08.030 E.7 entitled "Uses Within Recognized Historical Structures", however, permits designated historical structures to be used for "other than residential", subject to use of the Conditional Use Permit. I understand that the planning staff has recommended approval (or use of a) Categorical Exemption as a method of complying with the California Environmental Quality Act 21000 et seq., for this historical landmark designation. It is our opinion and position that the Categorical Exemption does not apply under these circumstances because the City has knowledge that the historic landmark designation is a first step that will lead to the application for Conditional USe Permit to use the property for non-residential purposes. \\ ~~ Already, I am informed, the ownerS are using the property for non-residential activities such as receptions causing noise, traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. Because the environmental impacts are "foreseeable" the categorical exemption does not apply. The Association supports historic preservation but also seeks to avoid the encroachment of /3/ .. . . Honorable Historic Preservation Commission . Page two August 2, 2001 noncompatable uses into residential neighborhoods. Most importantly, the Association's goal is to educate elected officials to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and to ensure that the statute is followed. We are requesting that the Categorical Exemption not be approved and that an Environmental Impact Report be required at this "earliest stage in the proceedings". We are also requesting "reasonable assurances" that the City's custom and practice of using the Historic Landmark Designation in this manner as a means of facilitating the encroachment of non-residential uses into residential neighborhoods will stop. Thank you in advance for your consideration. S F JAMES DeAGUlLERA JD/sep /32 ....... . . 1 JAMES DeAGUILERA, ESQ. #166315 2 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES DeAGUILERA 2068 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 218 3 Redlands, California 92374 Telephone: (909) 307-5750 4 Fax: (909) 307-5755 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO In re the Matter of: Historic Landmark Designation of Property Located at 5917 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "Krysto Ranch House") ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATION OF AITORNEY JAMES DeAGUILERA 16 1. I, James DeAguilera, declare that I am an attorney at law, licensed to practice before 17 courts of the State of California, and am the attorney of record for Citizens for Responsible 18 Planning and Neighborhood Preservation, an unincorporated association herein. I have 19 personal knowledge of the matters stated herein, and, if called as a witness, I could and would 20 competently testify thereto. 21 2. On Wednesday, August 1, 2001, at approximately 10:00 a.m., I spoke to City of 22 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Aide, Shonda Bello, by telephone call placed from my law office 23 in Redlands, California regarding the Notice of Public Hearing, Rancho Cucamonga Historic 24 Preservation Commission related to historic landmark designation DRC2oo1-oo369, Joseph and 25 J.L. Walker, to designate the Krysto Ranch House as an historic landmark. 26 3. Planning Aide, Shonda Bello advised me that the property owner(s) had spoken 27 to the Planning Department staff regarding their interest and intentions to use the property for 28 DECLARATION OF JAMES DeAGUll.ERA Raocbo\raDCbo.dcc /33 - t,. .-..; . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 weddings, wedding receptions and banquets. 4. Planning Aide, Shonda Bello further advised me that the Planning staff had advised or instructed the property owner(s) that they should apply for the Historic Landmark Preservation before applying for a Conditional Use Permit to use the property for weddings, wedding receptions andlor banquets. 5. At approximately 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 2,2001, I met with Planning Aide, Shonda, Bellq and Planning Assistant, Emily Wilmer, at City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. Planning Assistant Emily Wilmer advised me that it is common practice for the Planning Staff to advise property ownerS who want to use residential property that has historical significance for non-residential purposes to apply for historic landmark status for the property before applying for a Conditional Use Permit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this ;; nD day of August, 2001 a LAW FFI ES DeAGUlLERA DECLARATION OF JAMES DeAGUlLERA RaDCbo\raacbo.dec 134 2 2 11t:l,.;t:.LVt:U: 0- !O' I; I! :U"I'lMj ..... 11 vUvI'lMVI~UI'l vUM l.ll::V j ,,! FROM : . FRX NO. : . Dec. 14 2000 12:25PM P1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AU6 15 2001/ RECEIVED - PLANNING August 15, 2001 To; Larry Henderson AICP Principal Planner F."om: .Joseph & Linda JL Walker Subject: Landmark Designation DRC2001-o0369 Dear Sir, My husband and I are happy, that our bome is being considered for Landmark Designation. We hope that it does become a Designated Historical Landmark. Also at this time w.e are Dot applying for a conditional use permit. The history of our borne is fascinating, and we hope to learn more about it. Si,Dcerel~ A-~ ~ ~. "-', L _---.---'/ ~JL {.I./Q c' / '-.---------.---- \,l ~ D 135 .t .. t;:; v.u I 12.. , 'T' t-.. RECEIVED: 9- 5- 1; ~:o'rM; ~~ n ~U~~MVN~~ wUM U~Yi ~~ FROM : FRX NO. : Jan. 134 20131 134: 1BPM P2 . September 05, 2001 To: Mr. Larry lJeuden.eu Principal City Planner From: Mr. & Mrs. Joseph A. Walker !'i917 Archibald Ave. Alta 1.oma Subject: City Council Meeting September S. 2001 Dear City Council, We are unable to attend the Meeting Wednesday Sept.. S. 2001 at 7:00 p.m. However, we undentand there il nothing required of .O(UI _bis evening, in order for Y011 to make a po8itive determination. . We want to reiterate our full support and encouragement uf Landmark DesignatioD. Sincerely, I j)) .. ,t'.ptj i-r-' Jose~ ~ & Linda JL Walker ~a/lr~ c___----~~, ~c:.JZ~~- I b&' . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . ~ .' SEP 04 2001 RECEIVED - PLANNING August 30, 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Planning Division RE: LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION-JOSEPH AND J,L. WALKER-Krysto Ranch House located at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15 We object to the above address being designated as a Historic Landmark and/ or obtaining any type of license, to conduct any type of business. This property is basically in the middle of our quiet, residential, 'Iz acre, horse property. These homes were built in the late 70's and early 80's as city approved residential, horse property tract homes with bridle trails. Historic and business activities will gready change the climate of our neighborhood and threaten our homes. We feel this is an invasion of our privacy. We live in a residential neighborhood that should stay residential. The house in question has already been having celebrations (or conducting business??) of some sort without a business license. We have seen part of the bridle trail cheaply flagged with multi-color flags and a homemade wood tripod that says with a cardboard sign "no trespassing" clearly in view of all driving on Archibald Ave. In addition they have claimed 7 '12 feet of our historically established bridle trail. Guests/customers have parked in this area in conjunction with what is probably the Krysto Ranch Houses' property. Guests/customers pulling out of this parking area are pulling out unsafely onto Archibald Avenue, at the base of the right turn only lane for Cottonwood St., into a blind area since this parking lot is located to the north east of the house property. Guests/customers have already parked on Archibald Ave. in the turning lane for Cottonwood St. Does this mean any tenant can claim their 7 '/2 feet and bridle trail no longer exists?? This bridle trail is part of the master plan of this approved tract which has increased value because it is "horse property". E 1~7 Ii- .' The neighborhood is well aware of the master plan the owners of this property have to conduct an "elaborate special event business". This will greatly disrupt the tranquillity of our neighborhood. With all of these customers, comes a lot of traffic, congestion and noise. Liquor licenses bring many problems that a residential owner should not have to face. We feel this "Historical Landmark/Business" could cost us in many ways and we feel the City should be liable for any costs we may incur if this "Historical Landmark/Business" is approved. We work all week and feel we should be able to peacefully enjoy our homes, pools and yards without interruption of the public or this business' customers. Again this neighborhood has been home for a lot of residents for many years. We have a great monetary investment in our homes and they provide us our refuge. Our bridle trails are unique to our properties and offer what many tract areas in the city cannot. We demand that an environment impact report be done immediately without granting Historical Landmark to this facility at this time. We hope our "elected officials" will protect our rights as property owners and not be influenced by business trespassing on our rights. Respectfully submitted, Cmp~~~ ~d~~ Deborah S. Thompson /311 SEP-04-01 TUE 01:45 PM,JOEL*CASCA I 08/26/01 Mayor William Alexander Members of Council Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mayor Alexander: I My name is Shawn Stone and I live at 9728 ~unflower Street: My wife R~~~~t~ :;:!':~~~~~~;~:)~X concerned about future plans by the resident, at 5917 Archibald Ave., ~'u~~,tJieit:';'~,.~~>}~~t~(if~~:":'i'!)': rccently s.ubmitted hi~torical I~~mark des.ignati~n request as ~ s.teppi~~ ~~?J}f~MXt~.,':i:i,'ttj}~;L~~~F:;'.~ commercial USe pe~lt. Co~cll1S to conSider this l~dI?ark .deslgnatIO~ r.79~le~. ~~ the :~\~f;~~~t~,~.:~.,,<, September 5th co~nctl II'l;eetmg. My north property line IS adJ.acent to this ~r.ol?~ ~.' ~~::'i;!,~Jt;... ::fi'<; sepm:atcd .bY a bndle trail. ~ur ~nc~~ ~th the above-mentioned p:?petlY,i~; ~t. }vltf: <. j~l:1J~\,('r~':: \ the hlstoncaI landmark deslgnatton, tf It IS used solely for that purpp~~,: put~\th. t!:}.El .": ..,,~:;L.N;f1f~ "."J, owner's intent to obtain a commercial use ~ennit ~hou1d the desigtlliU?tl be~Wi~~: ft: 1~..:!}~~1~~10,~:\~' no,:,", common knowle~ge among all t~e ~esldents In the ~a as ~o the 1~fe!1:tt~p.:s.~[!l1e ..:~/~!tpi~~r;B;'Jt:. ; reSident at 5917 Archibald Ave. The mdicated plan ofusmg their proPerty.;~;~'~~~es~. 3.;:~'?~~~~', ;;;:~.; for weddings and parties i~ strongly objected to ~y all residents, in our afe~,:~:;~f.:have.~, :/i~\2:~?t );:1.;:.. al~eady had to tolerate their prcsumed non-penmtted use of their proPerty'f~tJ~~.9::WtltIe,~.'ff/~~j~l;;Vi:~:: With large groups of people. . " .;:;,;.;'r:;l:i':,::,...,"~MJ\, .:d:~. ~;'1. ,<.~ ,,:""'i ~~, ~;'1~\"~V':..'.1 \,' t"'~";' 'J r~ ",\."'.1\:': '"}..' c'~~'({'l~:"".s~ '. It,." " '''';,,',''~':'.Lr.','~;. :,~:.t-::r.'~T' f.ff::" \:,.'~ As a homeowner ~ho will be higbly impacted by the future pl~s, bo~. finah~,jWt1: '," .;.~:~'tt~;tt..;<~~/ . (property devaluatIOn) and suffe~ a negative Impac! on our quahty of !.!~e~, ~t~<~r~n~y, ;":::fi~it~:i~t',"Ji~'. hope that..~y attempt ~y the reSident at ~917 Arch:ba!d Ave., to ~btaIDJll.Wr,e)1Ut. ';fji"%.~;}~ .;-:'t\;,: . opporturutles to use thiS properlY for their already indicated purposes Wit,Y:.~~~ ~~,\:-:;;$.41;;J~;~::V-;. GRANTED. ., .""'-;"'.,... &,/;,>;:.",.!(.t,.. '." , " :.r~)i.~l;;'~~;':;', ~ \~,,:~ tit:r~ljt:,~';~~::' . ....~Ij.:,"~k...1, -""'.:r.:l,.1.':y';~1 ~~"f.~~: We purchased our property in 1984. We submitted plans to build our drel!i;%8~e\pn t!1i~'l~ln$.;: ~(::1'~', property. Our home was built and what we quickly learned was not only.?~;~twr':":<;~~}\;~:~~~;'(' only own our dre~ home but also we now are part of the grea,te~~ neigh?9~M,~~Jtinp~::~~Wi1?:~t:;!np Alta Lorna. Our ne~~borhood has been a. safe have~ for us to raISf; ~o ~jlllf!t~~r;r!t:~e /i~~!/.~l~:,':;f.(:'" are many other famll1es who have moved roto our nelghborbood hopmg t9..pav.e the same ~.J(,.~~.l'~,.'~~~" quality of life we have enjoyed for so many years. It is only falr they be \l.ij~~{~~ tq:dC?, 's.~;;~~~!~~~~<:;f' . without the fear of having to compete with loud bands, weddings, alcohol C~Q~\J~~~,?:It;:~~}ll;~hl~~~': . and parkmg problems. '.. .', .,~.;~ ~;;.. i'. :r!.;.;.~,!/!!j(:;;"l'r~ ,\!,; , ~""Io~~"': "~', JI. t,A; "1""'" ~it 'f' '...~.J :J./~' s. ~-;.,~~: ~'~f~ l!: ,~1' ,I , . '. \ ';~ \ ,~,~~:-::~.tr.i.~\~'l'~ ~;~J~ a-.~~~~ ',~ -~:..'. ': ..~ '~'., '~" I -~.51'~/~-R",v, . . '" .'.~ ,';':~':~:...-I'~:'(~,,: "';t--41J;J;'io.........-!.. ; I' . -k-~..~l:.; ,:' ':~?':.J:t.:..;:..~~~,~~,.<f~.;; . " ":~1 1.... . ")/ ~ "''''^' 'f'" 'J \u , ,,",: :~~fr.,',~, ..... ~~..r.;'..;~!Tf"'.f.:t::~~'~,. ~" .':!:/i'lr~~ .,,<.':~,I 'a~~\\";~~'~~f" . ..,; ,."')';; . ,'.;.of' \ "','''' f; ,";':: .,,*,.~!tt:.~\~...,. ' , '''''i' ,~.. I':'" .. "':-'1 ...r) '-I~. ";1" . " ,....1 ,~.. .,.'.~. ;-::'11I"'4.:'7 "'.\~:1'),t ~-.l'.~' , ... :}'V::',~{1 (.,;: ~:.~~~::":~:{.tf'\:~~' . - >,~.:t:t1..~,c" , '-~I r'~" . I' ~;\ ,,"~"#~I"""l!t'~" . ,,:~,'.r.., ~; ~',.;:'..... . ' , ">"\Y":~';f.,~~l'''':'.:-: ~>-fS:.~:~}:..,l;-:,t';:::',: " . .,' ,....~. J' ~','. ""l:>~~t~.A~!"" .~_.\ ',' ~ ~.(.':i;-:':'. ,'; '':-f:','4'''ti~'~, ,( ~L:.' . ,. ~'.~ ,~"'!... .t'r. ..~~.ill,,,~.>t~, I. o . ':1 : ,.~~..~..'\ <', "'" \k.~'I'''';';'~''''~:) '~'\"i': , . '1'.j ".~'!:-:l,..,.~;- ":~~~~,i-~'~Il~,~ ~"" '.;'~" ~:,';\~;.;"~:.""'1:~ <,.,.\:J.....,~\~'t <( ';" : ,,- " oI~,oI;~'.I~~."~'''' ~'..aj "-~ ' ,.~ ,':'::,'"~,,,~~ll {.V;':'::;f~I;,'~t ,....r;...... We built our home with the intention ofliving in it for many years. . Out paA't~t~l~~":' ~:':t~f;j.i~!l~(i~~;': was chosen partly because of the unobstructed northem view, including 'ih,~ pii4A!\~~.A~~.ri~t~k::i: ~; beauty of the residence at 5917 Archibald Ave. . . . ...;!. .3}.'~\";'>;~.:';)U~"i,;~<~"i:;~." " l'l!' i. {,~.,,', , .../.',~ \ ~11\'<'~r~~c ,,~. ... i "S ;";:1 .. I ..;"S\~.j.' ~~~ ~~....'" -=- ~ ' .' 1'\j.~/.~:t"1"." ....1. ~4':'~\".!:"l',.r. 'Ii~.: The peace and serenity of the surrounding neighborhood was the ll).ain re~~'if\Y,ii:p,o, s~...tfk;r*~;~.jr'i{i;.\ ." b t fth. 'ghb h d R 'd . I . hb h ol.,r...'fi''''''.... ,.,I,...;ilt'1~ f. ec~~e a p~anen part 0 IS ~el or 0.0. esl entia n,~g . o~ QO~.1'!9dPr.',;,\./ /" ,'J\~:::'.'\<4t;:.~,: . far~'llhes to. enJor on a regular ba.sls and not I~tended for co~erctlll.u~age;:l,~RV.J~~t:':"iit,t~i~~~~:~;::~:~i.. bUlld a resld~hal development In ~ excluslvcly cOD?merclal ~se a:ea fUl~~,g9 ,~~~e~t.,;;'fi~1tt'-~{:~.:... to have to be mvaded by co~ercIal property usage In our resIdentially Z6Ii~9.!1;!~.~,\~e;,;.v'!f.;t.{..(~~~~ ,~,~ ,'.. seventccn years ofpeacefullivmg. . , ;:, -,;~.;~;;::..,.:>._;,;,:.~::~}~:,,, ,~;,:. ,'h' ;.J,'''-_~''; '1':', <~i':,>~,~,,'f1~_! dlJ . . " "'\\ " J":, ~ 8"f~' 1 f '{.'''' {(, . I open!y extend the offering for you Mayor and any of the C01:lIlcilM~b~~:r~~W bi.: .:~;(.t~~~'~r~;J' our neIghborhood, my home, and see firsthand what a negative impact.tp.e:p:!"9~qs.e.dPl!lI\S:;"1~;~~';~'" by the resi~ent at 5917 Archibald ,,":ould hav~ dircc~ly on 0;u neighb()rh9<?q.tt~~i~ ,ap4. I "i::A;:,ilt'.r~k '~.. . thank you In advance for your consIderation lito thiS very Important matleT~::1fH~.'~o.~'~,f.':;,in~1..1l"~ ~_'.: happen to you ' , .... :,,,, ,.,"'*: : ..~, "i~"')"~' '1"'" . -\ ~ ,,;.. , ,\ ," . . I. '" ,t.:'l, ~'~1 " ,.. 1:.. 'I~ ~i' \ ~. ,~~ .~"'i" ~,., ~, ~ ..:t'l~,tl" ':. <~~.f,;;,",ql~"'~1" . . '._' ~.; ~I~~-:~ : ';' -::v:.:.i;."'t~;"i'.~1..~ ; ,~;",' SIncerely , ;'.' '~',~) '.1 '11 ;.",;: \ (f\.!i 'i" " ,,':.-...., ~ ...",,', ".\~~".~c':~;;t".t':. "~~",,'" -,\'''' ..,:,. ,~;l ;V.,'~;<t,':'l~~',,' ;f;.i.~~ ffi'~~ ~. ,,"~"'~~':.i.'i"';..?..l,,~~ ^'~~';;1:t." '";:-: ~ ,.1\'; ::,.."t,..~. ~.., . ~~?, ~ .'::"':, ." -', . ,.r;:f!'\('" '"'J' it!.:., ",~...':.'t.;.t;:\:It!.\~...... ',' "....".~;,:,...._..\!.'.~:,li'~"..:..,iJ .. r,";.';.';.~': '.:.~t-:..,,~1}:l>' ~',~- ,'" ,; ... (I;/r" ,I." . ^ ':t,..,../,t';. ~. .' It""': Shawn. andReneStone ,:,..".,':.'?'.:;:...' '. { .'~;P";r' "'.'-',' ' q. , ,..,.,.", ...f':h>J."'!~,.,~"" ; ,-...' r', ...,~ :\' ~ ' ~ '"r~"I.:' .1l~GJ..(' <! fl 97~8 .sunflower Street .; .' ",.., .'1',."" .' : f':", ,,';." ',,1 "', . /~' .:..:~~.:;rr.,,"'~~;~~~\\~~' .'{" 'V;: Rancho Cucamonga .'~' ',,, ,,,", ,,,., .-',.-"-""".\'''' ,,,,,,,. ~.'~r:. ~,'.. .."<\~I,,:t:'~.h~J.. "~: I' 909-980-8778 '. '.J.., ."N{. "';" 't";~l'.~~:'~\' "". '. J ~r .'~~~ .;: l..4"_'t 'l+.ci'~' 'I"'" . " ,~'{~7. ~ .,.M.~,."I'~ll.}6-' I ..... ,.,' .",. ~. ~ ,'!.',,'! '......i!~ ~'~'>~;y;{~~~'" " .. l<'.P .{~~.~ ~;-;:'t;'~i:;,St~~]~l,i~~~' 11 -,;,,~X!"""',.">I' ~."{",,,~;r. '''~j'' " ~:, .:~~ ::)::. :.: c,.~<:~~~"f;,~tf:t;~~,~:t:":" . '.. ",~, . "ii' "r'..l.~I$: t ,~.'. ",..,~ rl,l':".,~'" A'ltx'" j~:o/i~ .,- l' 1 .~" "I"""'M .. \. .". "-l!~, ,", ~i ' . . ,.' '1,..J~'J': "';. , ",~f~.I:{:'i!."'tl.I~':':":;,, .) "~;.:;; ....\ '.",..'-, . rf1i!'!--. '....'I' ,; ", ,.c;.......'t ~'.... ";l( ,rJ:;'~ . .~~':~,...- . .' ,r.. " ;.~ ~ ~l .J.....I.-]_,~~~j~~ Jf, "''''kJ ( ~ "~.,,:'~':'..-;'lr """~'!.;__:"";~A"'l." ," ~~ .t\".:\h;',;~'J~."', ,'."..:~'j>~Jo., ;./,.!' ':...,!i-'\'. : r.. .' '. ;:'~:~~r:' 'l~,\,"i'_~.{t""~}r,jt'- JI~" ~ f...."~~~ :/".\ 'F ':f,~~~ ::,.-..Il.:"l ~'e~' '" I, _ ~~"-:' ,~.. ' ~;;'-71t~:>,; l! '. ~ . ,. '.;... ..,','." ""';("'1t' .~ ,'. ,.'r' );. ,I:',';! I . , ..';'~~"" ?'.i.~F. ,'.c.t'l ,'. .;: '~tlj ;~~'~:!:. '~::t,,~71:};Y"\i' ;-:... ;~. . " '~.l ,. ,.) ~.; .> ,"J.,. .. , , ." '.'1l.j.-L-,...: ~ ',i,r "l" qr. '-, R. ' :';' '~::'f.t:~,~"~l'~~~";?t~~~:i; r:".:~!,'. . ." I h',1 . "" '\-~j "':it "._ (le.." F. , .... .I,' 4 ;,'. '~~'.." ".: y r ,>, ,1-< '.:'~r:~~,' ,:<,..,., , . I ~ Hi" . 1. . .~. ~ 4~J''>t ... Q'I, . '." "'f' "\}',"l' .,,,~..lI'. \ ''il'l'.~ I~"> ' . ,. J,'. .' . ~', '.~~;.:;(;:.. '1;\f 0(,.,' " ',' " I.<~:.t. ~ 4:~~.(-;.t"it;~.'.J;7t-.~, ' .' " ,'t,t ' ..;, ~. ~....,'....,." Ii .::(..,..::-':I:f ';<0'. ' r . '._~'J o!:...(,.''':''''''' '~!~!~ ;::1!1~'~ '~~/~.J~' -'" '.r ,': " ../ .,.1. .!.l'-,",-f'~i:~"'-"''' '. " .~l':: "" ",\"~tl, "'J ~"'It:t ~ '';':';;'' ", 'i-".' .." ,..~~:;pI."^~;..~,., .l t>, J', . ",,1"'< ..~" -~.... ". ~ .'. ,." ~ I>.t~~, "',',l,."IJ:.';:.,-:'j";'~', ,{ '~J . '., ",,,'.',-" ",."t\.,-;'l0l~tf .~~ , .. .j "-. ...." ',~..,~ ...lr......... ~ ,~:'\' .'- '!.'.',t'~':I~..c"'~)."":vi;~ .~. , . ~ J'I I., ' "'. ',,-. '~I"./.( .~"',)" t ;:\.... .' ~""F,"~"'''' :-;"\ ~~~r,'.'l.,."]l .' ,';. .:~ :& t . ~.;. p..(, . .{,.~.ilfl!"tJ1"" 'h '. ". ~'-:':'~::!3~~1.~.- .:~y-:;4~.::'\s."':';~'~i.~I['~~ . .-. ._'...~1]" ,I, 't""",.,~'li ~:,;l\f l.i <,,~ ' :- ':.... .'i~ '0',t',~' '~~'t...~;'l-":'';'\f.~- ~1':'" . - :, .f",. . ,", "$I','_..)o-il..l~:t " '" , . "'~'.,-'?;';'"l:;.l...\" .;,*~I~J, <;/,-.:::.':", , ',/1 '1' I'l. ....' . ".'J '$." ~).~ I~~ ,,:... .';" ,,',' ":~~J'~ ~:"... /l~ .~t~:'~;~,:~~1F~, t'~t. : , ., 1 :':h,:;t=:'~ ~ ~;:f~~j;l~ ~.e~'~~~,~,.V"i ( ',':~ :~,i:{~:l;1\!:"~'~~':~~'r.7SY!.{'~':1.r.? ,>'~" ~t:>. 7.~'t', .- :.d>t'4J"'l:.~1~:'f'~!;i-l' , ""J' '1_' ~f.., , . ' _7('~, ,.~ '" l"'-~ I ._>,~ ....~,,,.';:.. ' ;:, ;"':~.~<ll ., {_' , ",' 'ilJ'~ l/'/y'" '.1-'';;',)'1 ,""l;;,~~'.~ l'p.' ~ ...I.'..t....,./ ~.;tr .t1-'..'~t.J'~ <'~,. ,', :~.' 'M"'l'-' .d.':";; 'ql._ '~..,) Ji::',;" :3 ' .-':1"( ,;.t;;' .,' ':,,'t~j~:',~\j':..li 'i;?,' . , ,/,:~:,~~:..\.;>'~~' :...~.1.::.~~~{!-~~r.;?J..- , ' ~"" "M''(€l'''' ;\,I;...'l~1Joj~~&~,_"" ':-':J;:~~~~~;ir.;:,: '::;~j.; '/ if () From: JOEL CASCADDEN To: Donna Date: 9/4/101 Time: 10:16:24 8/23/01 Mayor William Alexander Members of Council Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mayor Alexander: My name is Joel Cascadden and 1 live at 9729 Sunflower Street. My wife Lisa and 1 are concerned about a potential commercial project being considered within our neighborhood. Council is to consider historical landmark status at the September 5th council meeting for a house located at 5917 Archibald. This house is just north of our home. Our concern is not with the possible landmark status but with what the owners are hoping to use the property for. The owners have clearly indicated they plan to use this property as a business for weddings and parties. In fact the owners have already had parties with large groups of people. As a homeowner 1 find this highly inappropriate. Our neighborhood is a safe and quiet place for raising families and backyard barbecues, not banqnets, loud bands, weddings and parking problems. The idea of having a business in our neighborhood is simply unthinkable. Lisa and I hope that you, Mayor Alexander, and the Council Members agree. Residential neighborhoods are for kids on bikes not overflow parking and wandering business patrons. Please take time from your busy schedules and drive down our clean streets and see the families out in their yards. Stop and talk to us. Lisa and I thank you for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely, Joel and Lisa Cascadden 9729 Sunflower Street Rancho Cucamonga 909-980-0726 Page2of2 11./1 , Robert Fasma 6009 Burgundy Avenue AltaLoma, CA 91737 980-5874 A~lgust 20, 2001 Mayor Alexander P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 , ,.; ::;.&;j_.:.. 'J..;(:"~ ..l'il ~~ . -,~ ,~'~..~:~"~r.tl,~;.~~, ~,.tJ',....'!-~ '-1:'1t.",. . . :..:. ;.',.' ~'';''' ~...t;t.~"! '~'.~ .' .1~';;Fa~/';'~""';~~'_:'",\,tf" ':",..... .- . .,~:... ~ ifr-u.:.4~.:r,~~~ ~~~'.. . '. .~,~'~k';O"~1:~ .~it""'~""~-ntt'4 ~r.: , " . ~.r.;,...,.., 1 "'''';t ,.'.' f?',PI' ,,' l'l' I, '::",, "~(;':~(~~:::.....'.~.if'? {""'~ , ",I. ~'.I ,.l,....c ..~~)!;:~:.t j(:..~, . ." '. .'", ... .~"""'...I1'Ff ~ . :' :~<:~'~:.:.(~~~;~~!:"~ ;~~~'i 'h{f , I ".1-.-., . ~ ~ . />: {"'I.. \ ' . . . ~{~~.~ ~'\~T:",,"1'X~.~' 1J:f~~q' , . h,' ~;u, 't ...~r. '. . :l' . ; - f~~ ~ ,~.~'.j ~~~, "'5~~':~, 'l':'~~ . .~. ,~-","':"':;', ~\. '"$:j1....' ~r'.~. , '~.~ ('7....,.. '..r.~ ~ .,.;r. ., . ;' I., ~. >J....:~.t ~..'"$ ,'"'r ~")', I~~'" ., 1,..'1; I' .,~, .-.'.~X ,.r11'";;<1 (~ ';~l.$" " ,". ..~~~~f ''';'''''i','' '4-1.k~i!; ~~j~'l Dear Mayor Alexander: .: . ,".. (i~:"" (iU,~"..i.. ..:, ~,; '*I;,.:~ '.:: "F:~.4:l~;I~";~~~lr"";~I';?~~:;~':' .~.. ',,:;'"1', '~'-~'-''4.,!...~}.1.~.; 1'<. J. am writin? you to cxpress my concern over a .sil~ation that will affect ~he c?d1~i(91~i.~-*~~M-:t~Eft";::~:', live, my nClghborhood and my home. An applicatlo~ for landmark deslgnatlo~ .h~?~~.~~.~grl1~~~7\~~:i~~: . for for the Krysto Ranch House located at 5917 Archibald Avenue. ' ..::...,r':,..'~':~;"'. ;;::r\~,.~,!~~1'~ , "~ ."1'''' ", ..;. e, ..,~~"'~,(.'" ,. '.-1: J'Yf.'l:':""- ".~-'"~r;';"'~/~ .~ .r,' My concern is the apparent intcnded future use of this property as a weddiWi >>,~~htlW ~~>~~)~iiii~~~ _;~:1. banqu,et facility.. It.is, apparently, also com~on knowledge among so~e merrib€t$~bf.~~j*;:<' ;'.::,~f.~~~~ . Planmng CommiSSion or D~artrnent. 1, With a large number ofm,y neighbors, attended iliii-\ ._,,,,,,,~',.;[\t: .:;.r." Public Hearing on August 8 at which the recommendation to the City ,i:J~.~~!l.i~:~esi~ .~?;,. >.~..;.t' Krysto Ranch House as an historic sit.e was voted on and pas~e<;" ~t the tin:1~~f..~ i*~~;$.~;~~i~!t~:r: were, told that the purpose of th~ he~mg was only for determl~mg If the pto~em: .~~.. #II:' :;'~)}'~f;;;~~(;f::!;: , .. reqUl~ements fO,r landmark ~~slgnatlOn. AI~o s!ated was that If~e p^opertY;~M~;'!;!,~r.~~.f<t~1~i~~~~i.f*;~:: weddmg recepttons, a conditional use permit Will have to be applied for atid.l~Sclf.~~:?:NSl? ,~t\:,~~:~t~f:'~~" was ~e understandi~g t~at landmark de$i~nation did no.t guarantee anautorria~.o2.~~.~~\~i~~;U:\><~;;:~h~;nV . permit, and that applicatIOn for a use pcrmlt would reqUire the nOfllJal proces~:,<.:~ ',~~'~.t',.':')';::;;;~;1f~';;1~1~:ti}i, ' : ':; .;' ';; ).:;':~~' ~-':. ";: ~ ";~..y....'..;5l:,\;1i'/' ,It>.;:,~ ". . ".' ;..\....;r.}',.'.i. ,"1 '0' ':~ ~'f .oI....~~~)Jt..:.'.I.V What is of additional concern to my neighbors and me is that f\l(1t that it ap'pe~sJIi~\ 1)11;11e'Clty'~,!'~~tl~i effort to cre~te more /an1mark designations, it ~ay b.e as.sistingthe own;rs iW~~t~~~ft~.rt t~.~}~:WV~h~';~:' . create a busI~ess enteqmse on the property. ThiS action IS ~O! o/lly Ullfalr t?)t~:~9,~~~,,\tErt;r.~~t~.. may also be Jllegal. From what I have been told, laws pertalnmg to the envlrqX!m~~fa,IP.l.'Qtec;Jlqij'-~!.t;&r;i~" . of hist~ri~ landmarks ~eql\ire an e.nvironmental study to be performed prior to Its~:g~:1~3~1!'i!~~~11~!: when Its Intended use IS for a bUSiness. , " '/i~: ~:~}f~~A~;~1~'~~%1%1fi.t~f~fi"~,:" . ...~ I.I~~,,,,~d,. . \\t'-'~~~i;f!f~'J\" J ~ appreci~te the fact t~at rumors, inaccurate informatio.n, and ~yst~i1a c~~:~.tr~l~'p~o.bJ.ciJ~;1.~~H\,:(;~'g::: that 1~ actuahty do not eXist. V0at.J reque:t of you, .a~ a city offiCial, I~ fOf Y,~~i~;W~: t~~;::V~t11r:t:;~1. . Pl~nnmg Depw:nnent to dctermme If there ~s any validity ?r trllt\l. to them I1~V!M}$<?)'(~e.?ge.?f;~;~~:~it;Il;, . thiS property'~ ~ntended futur~ use as a busmess. Ifthere IS, requlr~ the en~I~Q~~r!~}plP'''~H~~'h~~~';t\(. study or conditional use permit be filed for prior to the property bemg desigl\ate~1if.,g!ft,?r~;:lr;;J!!~ i!rt1'.: landmark . '. ....'.'.:'f<:('.~j~<i,<.,':.<jl:J. ~(.,..:? . , ':.'.::: ,:';.~;~3r$~:?{~'~.~/~~~~€~j~~~. ~)S:~': "', .1'~ ':.~J!,<IJ'{i'~.(!i<~"'~'.:I.,.~f:,~.,~;,., . ., .,_ ..>1...' l..'(' ,,''''~''k I....'),. ,,';..' , , .:. \::~"'~~'~~"J~ :'I-.";~ ,;'. t~.,qil~'!A,>' '.. ::::~f)~~:t~k~~{;~~:J~~~J~rl'-"' . . ."~' '''''i''','!,'''' t~"';\, '"',' 1J:i(.;;:J';,}, r"J. ", .; ::'d~}~~\>::~\::~'.~';f~ . ..': - '.-.'> .. '.1:' ....,u.' . /lIZ" /{:;~JJli~:;. :;:'",<;:~:~,. ,.<i,~~i>J~: . I ~....,.... -_--'__,__, --'- -, _...- -~_...- .......... - . . . ," '" ~;I' ~ '" '~.' '.' ' 1,~,".'~""_'I"~ ..;,....,( '):J. " . f.~ c' .. . . ".,.'(l': '.,"". -;'''''~$~t;f?, :k';':::' ' ,q,\' I..'~ f ,:,. J . "",;;( ,1.i.~{1'f'. . -;.':."'t';~' :. . "';i.-}.1rft :1'''''~.;..,1, '.~f'.,.F 'J\;i'" ? _........ '. ,Y .!t ~ "j'l' ':i:-!~'~'~(ol ~n.~ , : ;.,.:';'.: ~ t>l~, "IJy,f,."Jt~~f,,!'1 ,,~~ ,;~. ""'f"'!~":":i..0"'~".:~1'1~' ~.,.. .' ',;'" ",...;t'''''~;r. I .!h' d::'fi ' . \,."~, .,\ .' ~. ';;}'....~..'~..r:-~) I V'{.~,> II~: ~',:;:;:'~;.~r'.~1f..,.,:I;'.~~~: +~..~~;:~: .. ,....~.....". '~l!1~rfJ.~Wil,.y,'t~~' The major issue at hand is the intended future use of this property as a busin~~i.~:1Kf~,f~~4~~(i;5R:~i':'r' has been clearly expressed by the owners to some of the neighbors. It has ats~J?~\?fHn\l1;rttOn~f1,'h<li';~'~;'t' by their son, and by a tractor operator who was grading some of lhc propertYJ?i~J.pi~,~~':::';'~;~~i(~1;~;~ '';~:~' . . -.;.r_,.I~." ""("~~i _.tlf, understood to be a future parking lot. :'. :'~'f;il"i;:';~ffi~~~"!f~F ';;i~: , , -,. - .' _...". ,or. u 3:" 1'''!:!J' " !J"l' :~.\t.'i: .~' I'" :":':"f'"..;~\;.'J.': ,,1<.::1: I am extremely oppo~ed to the use .ofthis property ~s a business due to die n~g~,l~~f,~,Y.ect, i~W\~:0~~'ts ):~: / have on the commumty and my nClghborhood. I, hke most of the members Q(th~,P!"ty ~~~,S\ti;~~th7:~': " grew up in, and continue to Jive in the Inland Valley area. My family ~1?ved !<;l,YW~w 1~} 9.~9;~11jt{~t~. I grew up In Upland and graduated from Cal Poly Pomona. I am mamed ~d lj~yc:<JR.\lr Y91,1Og!~~IJ~ ~'i~~~(~;: ' boys. My wife and I .d~cided to li~e in the I~ss.crowded and, quiet com~tlnitt~f.t}!~P~~J}ji,~f~fW))'\" have many other famlhes. We enJoy the qUIte, peaceful envIronment this ar,ea !n0.9\.VJl for.':,~~,};:{t(,~. streets in the community are not crowded or congested. I work in Irvine and ~hBq:~'(6.:Comip1~('~1;'1>,;t:'Ti' ":.f.,l' -~ 1.....\f..1 iJ1j.,,~, " f: \:.. . (one ho~r plus each wa.y) rather than have my family live in Orange County d~~ f{iff.,.~;/," ~~~V'>'#.t'~; f.<~r: congestIon that area enJoys. ," ~'. ,,'~:~ \";,:~ '~:'~;'1.tl~~?iittt ,.!-."~ . ~ ,.l "rJ ,-, '~1" '~ . /~ : .....t.r:.J:h.I~~ "J '~1 .:1;.., . .11.~, -ri ',,'1!-. ~..>}':' J. ~l " Y- . r.~... ~ -~"r ,'. .t. .'. oil .." ~ :f" Allowing the Krysto House to become a business would result in increaseq tt,iiffl~.!~fh~.\"'~{[,;::~~:1~~~~6: surrounding are,a. The safety of my family and other chil~ren is also a e~nt~rq)~ffic;. o~:iuJ~;;j:j4~,itJ.:t, . d?es ~ot have SIdewalks, m~ boys, as well as the other nelghborhoodchtld~~n,'pI~Yi'~~ f'~,~~il,'j;i~r'~'.,' blkes 10 the ~treets. Increasmg t,raffic on ow: street, as well as the ,surroun4tng;,~~~,~t~;Y?):l ~'.. ,.::;1~~1tif;.;~:' ..: threat to th~lr ~afety, The questionable sobnety of some of the dnvers follow1.P,~.ff~~f~~.~~:~f,:ttM..t~~.. . banquets WIll also be a concern. . . .:. .,.:;',';,;,;.'))Ii.';:'." ',:":,.n"'Y'~:hP.:: It;.;., . . I, ,~lf ':rH';"}~;,:{1~>.1 ,:. "1..:.'3;}:r.t~t fl;:':~;,~~~~;,," The immediatc ncighbors will suffer due to the noise, which is common to th~fu'~Jifhi ?(m,~W:';f~~i}\~'." wedc;ling reC<:ptions an9 banquets. My wife and I enjoy sitting outside ~nd tal~i)'lg tOfllch'otber, ':"{,:.,;.~l . and our neighbors on the quiet days and evenings of Alta Lorna, this Wilrlj~r~ihe ~'tfts,!'.'li;>;~.:~;';;~ there are frequent parties held at this location. There have already ~en' a'r\ll1i~r .QfJe~cm~!' ,; I':;;' \i" at this location. They mayor may not have been for commercial reasons, bJ,t9~~~4,M.the_';';}.;;::~::'?~;!~;~~:" . limited number there have been, the noise was apparent, as well as the trash h~~.,~~~~4~~.~~~~:~~~~&~..-' of the partygocrs. ' . ...' "..,.."".; " - .-'.('"'. "'I"'~'I!'{ . , .,. '")~ ,"\.". ''';-''''" I: , . ."~ '~"'~:1'.' _"......l.;~~"i.b..;,.... ::' ,\ In tal~~g to Shondra i~ the Historical Commission ~epa~el)t. s?e i~dieat~~)~~~i~f;~P~~tB~fi:l i;' ~~; - . a eondltl?nal use penn.l~ would go up before a commltt~e ~nor to It bemg PO~~iQ,:~ 1I}ei -,,":: \~~i~~J~;t~, . commuruty. If the petition was deemed too controverSIal, It could be deehne<l.'llt ~~ ~o~tie~~ii~~.~;:;t " with no further action required. I hope that the consideration of turning this ~~N~*!5f..into al::~~2~t:{.;~~~:J;., business would be determined to be too controversial and declined immediate.l,Y;! ti~ 1;i;i;r,;:.,6.~),.:::\!~!;.t:;'if'," , \'1' e:;\, 'r::''\~t' ;'.:'~..J1:,:o; ~f.:;..f.~~ )~r" I would th.jn~ that the inte~est of the community and neighborh~od would tak~;A~e~~ff~n.~: ~~~~tli~~,~t:};,~:: the finan~lallOterest ~r galD of ~ne property owner. I ~annot thInk of one behl;ftt:k.~t,Ii~ i>iJ_\1::~J1~~1~~~f\' eommunlty that a bUSiness at thIS locatIOn would provIde, : ~ :,:'. ;~'~~~~.:W';:::~~~;J"~rJi'.! .~-~:\.. . ,.' .~;.(" .t\ '".". .:..'?i. ~ ;;_~~' '" ,. .',"'.';'''-. 'J.e,;" "t""~'rJ' " I understand the il~portance and value. of preserving historical plllces o~ sig~i~4~~~~J~ o+<tK~f~ f fA:. help preserve the hIstory and commul1lty of Rancho Cucamonga. The IronY O,(thIS, s~~atiQn IS~k~: '..,: l.."tt:, !h~t th~ city may be paying the price to p.reserve i.ts history, ,:hile ~estr.oYlng ~~~:-ifiY:fO~wff~~i~~{~ : It IS trying to preserve. Your understanding of thIS problem, mVestlgatlon and ji,i~~,:a~,n5.~,,:.::'!~!1).~f.n. ' would be appreciated. :::i,':.~1~~~f;~;~iti":~;~~t;}::, . '. """".,"'.:.:' ,.,., N(1.''''.~''''l:lJl'!'.W. . ~ ~. '~''''l~'$,:~;~' ::~ . -:'..y:.)=", j~' ,.... i.'.~'':..r ~ . ""J."/I""-'/' , ,".\p~'.;.' ':iof ,( ,.."". ~:-. " ,: ',' ~..q.;..~.;.:.::~.'~~~.;~ ~~~~, ;..r.-;.l.~ ' ~.. . ,. .;~..., .', .~. ,...... .'" ..~f..,.'.. .M"Ii~ {.....>. ~', .. .' (i~gi~rl~f{;t,';:;L ?~~~,~ ."""j:"p~'i/.Z~'~,; .: . .:'..~5]~;.F::::~.'>"'.'.,~r: 1 \, I,~""'~-"< '.;' ..... ....1M. ..~, . .... 't"",!, " .......""'-I'~'....:r.~,.~'V ~, ~ . ~ - . - u , ... -. --. .---...........- -=. ..." . _,.::.~. ~i'lp:~~VH );.'.J.v;~~""f.~ ~ ...- . ~rt41" . ..").:)-tt....}J"1', .NI:"~,.tJ\<,;:.t' .~_ ~<.~:5":;'''''~"'' . ,- ,- . ;,~/". v:),\,~, ~;:'" ;:~'..'ri t~~1': " ,..,.~'~~~..,...ry!...j~ (~\~~:-tl "'-.' , ;...../l.':.IL-'>.'..:,'v-:;..l.I':.~('1<~."if .' '~.~l'i',"., ..~:.'t(. 'I 1#' ,~' ~~, '" I\~' r ,'<..J.",v.: -1'1""'1 ~ ~ ~ '. ::' :~'A;:n~~;~;':~~t~L'~~i';,~,,~ t~:::,;~<. , , '\~"'l \. r. "I'.v.. !. l~ 'if~' i:~,.., . :- ,.I'::,~~~~j");t:.".:.~\;q~};.\t. I hope I have conveyed my concerns for the affect this will have on bOth lj1y~i~~~~kih~~~f.~~~;~:~~l~~;; community. I will be ?n a business trip for the next two weeks. I look forw#d..\~WW~;9':~;~~f~~~'~'~;~ . pcrsonally about this sItuation when I return. .: . "!:':.)",":,!~,.c<6.'i:"t*"~~ !;;:~.. , . .1 'il'" .', ,,' J.\(,~ ",~,<o\:~.-,. '~" . :.,. J" .J,'{;':"'I ~ ~~ r'_"'\f.'o1'I.I'~".oJ..:',I.t" . .\~, .'0 :~~~:~~~~r' ,";;tJ,1, 'S"'l,'l:~.~ ~.~.,. i}/~~.),..;.:;,'~"~~'~: ~~~~"<.~ }J,i..) " '"(r l'"r'~\"'i' ,'" ',~~: "J~ <" ~;.'~:r,:' J~;~ " ~,~:n :r~"!f~;''f. ~"f.', ~~i ~, . . , .. '(J'{;f."', .:::t...,~, ~,:" r.~":I."l-l:.:t "~' \7.A.,,, ~/.. ',':f~"';,i1:q', :l1,"B1<< ~,r-t'''' ~":'l'$;~~f~ ...~"', ;''r,~~.~~.:tt.!,.:,:,i . ... ...~. ,~" (~f'"'i:~ ,\,.<1\'<, .t :I,f.:\: " " ;'....;.;''''... ./.. .,{. o;~"'.r J;.f J;Ji '\1.1,;'.. ,'~\:-;,Jh~...:..'-i. ':!::;'~'!:~:.t~tJ-;";:t[ ~ 1",..,I{f.' <TJr..\~ ",""~,tl~:ntll'''~: J ~J~ ti. ~'.~ 1t~'1,...~r,~'''':~\~2J1~,"p~ ,', :' ~~~t.;f~;,\~< i :~.:<:,t1\~;'~~,l~~/~j~,\I'. " ..' '., ~\~,~..:., .,!:..;.t\":1..:;',~:.r.:.Jt1t':..;""": ~ .-<I"'-J'~,"iI'" .;....p.. ~!",,,i'.l: 7~ '. .'''l.'t,(.,.~,...,,:'':lr,?,~''<;;'..:k ..~rt. ~ ", . -:. ~.1" ~r, <H....~~.:.~,'\ :"'~" "h.'t' ~.t: .: ", ,;::~;... .{;~.,,',r.i'+~~j:~[t~}ta."~'~'~' . ". i\,.,)).!:,:.t." ~ . '. . ",;"~"""71f;1',~,,,,,;'t, ",. . >' '.."fJ.~,'~~:' ..:-v.'d"~"'i~.,f,"l~'~~r.:. ".~,,:" ',~'\:"~""'I;':.;{:"'~~ :~~~'j~~:!~ : 'v'~ 1 ,,,,~,,"". ..)i;t:'>il~'~,6'~'" ~., ., . f',' ~'. "","!lil '~.~... ,,>~ ' "" , '.. ~..~ i}.~,.~ :~~""'o. ~..~~~~'d,ti/. , , 'I"t' .1}....).\':". '.-rf.,' l:""~"-~~~. 1Y. <. ::::1.f~.;t~t~'~'~;~~;~~\:~'~IJ i'i;.~i~~: ' ,', ,''1'..../.,::;.,'.:<.\',':''1 ?,~..1 J1' '(,J'\., . l"-'i~" .!:'~:')4'l,')' : ";.,r,,.. \:::~,/_. "r.:.''t'~.:''l':'~l.,~,~b'''(<?-l~ v<l\",ri. .'. ".. ;,~,',,~.r ., ""'('~"''\jfl1.!1i'~l' !.~. ., ')':" ~'~"';i'%' ,J :"'"b w~{t;:~;~:....:1"t,' , """"N''''~ .1"'/'('\1 ~'\.;. .r,i' "', ~".,.,."'~ ",~".l'J:"'''' ..' ~....,...:~ ~ " ," ;,.Ij,:f \ "ll J.1,",,~,;.'~i :~'~~...\:\'.. . ~l" ~ ',} -'~I,,,,' "' .. ' i "~I'" . ~ .' ,<;'- ~ '_' "l~~.l'5t.., 'i; '\: , I, :~-<',~ .~~,;,)\.. ., ....\1 " 'ci';:: )it .: ' ,r"<:i'-/} .~.r, . ..::; '::\I.~"~' ~'I..:tit~;";;' " .'.' '":::': "\~,~':" \4'~~.iI:~Io"\y:t ~,~~. , ',' ," ..~ }." -,,~,.It ' [" 'l ':',.' 'l~(,=..:f:~:.~...~ .':..~o:(~.~ ~:f'r,.~, . ." "".,...'~'. ' \,:~~,~,,"~;-... ~', "-'/' "": 1;'1,\~,,1.:'< ,'~~;i~ i";i..' ~l,.1i: "'l<'~ ",,~I~~l;. ','~,"" "}'ft< ~~J"'-' ,;" . '.' >~~~ ...:.:;?-%{.~' ~:; ~.\'~';;lIX~ ,,~, '~"I'.'" " ~f"':'...h~\\ '(~~~~':.[:"" .;t~.1 ~'j . ' ,.~:y", . ~... . . !"'.'i'~ .:~":.;,.,~,.\-" '.'....1i.~;,".:::--:. ,~' ~!t' ',.~,~:,~;:~~~.q~~ : ',:~:"~"~'::;;"'.' ~~,l':_~~f:::. , ,.t,~~. ,\I."I"~'.\~ ~,'. ;"~'t'W~'C"~"'~"tI":l,", , :\ -:.:' '\.,i:~ J.':,.,'. '..; \Vi.~~')~":.~';~J:i '; 't, ' " .. ,.~-" ,,- . ,,'.... "<j; ,~~''';1. .:' ~S ~\'.~Ioi,l~ II ':'..y~:t\ '...~l~f ~~/~:r "I"~ ~\'1 " ~.~t"1,!i:~..'!r ',\, ~"I'; ;.:.(~}~1~~~ ~ ~ ',' ;~~(:f~~~ ~:~ fr~: :... .(i,,,,..,.. ""''''l^~1 ;.,t.,,,. : \'),,~~:~J~' :..,,; :'<i,:-">." ;::4t, I"~r : \, .,:;.r:.~~t~~\M'~~ ~,li;.l',i.) :~,J'5'..~:f51J.. c . '. .'~ ! 'fl' "~"\.';s '.-'" '''-'Sf' l.l\ , "J' t \t:, "'~!";S~'r.,lj'M'j, '. '. " '~:.'(J,;'.r.,'" :,~.;~~_ ;'il~:~=!.f..'~'~"c : .~:' " ,I ..'~ ~::,,:;I'I~>.Vj"lli' ~'I '~ ~. ,t, ".... ",,~~~;,.r. ~:;'7 .}"'''-~'' ." ,,' i"l'~ ~""'lh.~.:A<'i.''''''''~ri'. .. ,1..,~.,,:,;"".< >~. "'>l'."~f:~ ~ .", """,',. .,,.h t..,.~, .I"~'~V . , ,'" .~': ~ fl"J_ ,'-f J.. <'r~ ~. i .'1'..... ';" ~l~. \l'''~ ',.',_,. ;is,~:~' rl~: , ~:l;::;',\.. i. ~~r, .;"'~; ~~I"1 ,1-1..:,;'1 . '" ~~ 'J;!'t..1j,~F."'J.)'~ 'li";:~:1: ~ '~-.,\!-~" ;\'~.r~.~~:'11':"". ""~~I'2,",. .. ..,~....l~'" ,..~."..~";"~} >(:- e.) '~..~ ,: :~~~;~~.:!~,'". .:t~~~''"V'~J~~' t":o;(, .' '<~1' .,,\~. ',' ~:'l-, ...r"R!r (;..1''' , ,,;.~,J~.\~,'.;;:;,i.:~,t'i-"~'!.:ili-"~~~. ...~~' " ".', < .' Ai ,'">i< ,.~ .,,' - . ,:,,:,:,," '>"'J.:~, ...~'~ "'rf~ ';If . (..; , '.' .-; I 'l..~ ""I!"~:"'.~ -l<.::'r,;,"'" . < c .; '-',\ ':" :'<' ~rl.f";''''tt.-''~;!=''k".::'.;( .,' . ~, ,. !,J \, l:. ~', .~./f_'...'~'i.~'" '",!!, ,- ~. ~)l'" ':- ;:'::;. '1:~~::~t~;'~):'*f.:'. ~"~;' . .' ".~.., '~'i ',~~ ,..'~ ; ':""':t,.~,,,,,,"".{;':~~t.,:,,, i . ,.,1. ~ <. , .... - -,.' 'I" ~ ..~ i . .- "'. '[;..~..,,~~ ... ~ r "', i'..;;':;" ,,"'0; , ':.P':!"c.....,;. ~.(~.,:~~,"~lc(t~ ,~~~, ';'.\ - " ~, . t~:'~..,_ 4 !f'~~;j ;:!: . " ~""'.;lf:".;"'';''.l,"..:'.;)~'i'''f:~'' (\t, .' ,'~~>~.);: ')",!.~..~~':.~.':Q~:~ ~:~' . 'l.i~'-:"I;"':, ','} ....'i',:N:>~.1J;...~ ;.~ \~ '. <.'."/)'.' "1'"t'''''f~R)'''"'' . ;.:.;: .~, ~~::;":'" ",,'(/ .F;'~':;'= :1':' ~~' :.' ,'.' -; ;1'-'/",>."...:. "~' ::~,,,..~~~t '. /. ~.;- " ' ,~~': ..~~r; ;-. " >...~..! J:..?'tJ ~...'..~ .. . 'r 'it \" ,; ':......;.:~ ':, J"" '( 11:' \ 'J ',' ~".,l'; ;.;.r'-::;~'.~~"~."I~" /.'. , .::.,,~t{..',," ':"~~~~I'~_-l;')i":J. f~" ~\:, , . I" 'r....' , Tl~..,.,~ ~.'";:l. .," ... ,K"" '<;,... ',,\' ,~,1~.1".'. '" -'.Ij" ...',..'" ';.\~:. ~~',i':':i:..~.';: ~. ,~~_ : '. .:~,;.,~.. ...~".-:{,~, ..""~" .~) ".~.:. ,) i~,r12:~~~~::='>:j:;~.: "J.')dL1 ~;~~:~. ~"". ..:1.':"'({.J.~: ...:.~v., 77 ..~. /,;~;>l}Jf~f:~~.1.;. ~\~'1:~.'~'~~~.~~H.. .,.:i.~;' .... SinCerely, VJ-1 rP~ Robert Pasma Resident, Homeowncr, Taxpayer and Concemed Citizen NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of San Bernardino 385 N. Arrowhead, 2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Project Title: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 Project Location - Specific: Located at 5917 Archibald Avenue Project Location - City: Rancho Cucamonga Project Location - County: San Bernardino Description of Project: A request to designate the Krysto Rancho House and property as a Historic Landrnark. Narne of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Rancho Cucamonga Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Rancho Cucarnonga Exempt Status (Check one) X Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); _ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c) Reasons Why Project is Exempt: Exempt under CEQA, per Article 1 g, Section 15308 as a Historic Landmark. Lead Agency Contact Person: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner Area CodefTelephone/Extension: (909) 477-2750 If Filed by Applicant 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: Date: September 19. 2001 Title: EXHIBIT "F" 1'15 ~, ~ ,. Robert Pasma 6009 Burgundy Avenue Alta Loma, CA 91737 Daytime: (949) 855-8050 Ext. 2243 Evening: (909) 980-5874 RECEI YED CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~ ADMINISTR'~'''''.! cc Bill Alexander Diane Williams Paul Biane Bob Dutton Grace Curatalo Brad Buller September 10, 2001 SEP 1 72001 7,8,9,10,11,1<: Larry Henderson P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Henderson, I want to follow-up last Wednesday night's City Council meeting concerning the Krysto House. Hopefully, at the next council meeting, a final resolution can be decided. I can understand your frustration with the difficulty in getting the landmark designation completed. I realize that you and your staff have put in many hours of research and work for this landmark designation. Please understand that it is not my intention, or, I believe, that of the other people of the community, to stop the creation of historic landmarks in the city; only to prevent the establishment of a business in a residential area and the eroding of the community. As you pointed out, there must be a Conditional Use Permit approved for any business to be located at this residence. To the best of your knowledge, there has not been and there is currently no activity to do so and what you have heard has only been hearsay or rumors. Based on the comments and testimony of the residents, I think it must be clear that the Walker family has had and does have intentions of turning this residence into a business. You should be able to understand the actions of the community, as a result of the information provided at the meeting. It is rather frustrating and upsetting that the Walkers were not at the City Council meeting on Wednesday night in order to answer some ofthe Council Members' questions. The Walkers made this request for the landmark designation; one would think it was important enough for them to attend this meeting. We are all busy and have other obligations. Some of the residents present on Wednesday night were schoolteachers. Even with the turmoil of the first day of school, they made the effort to attend. Other residents took time off work or missed classes in order to attend the meeting. This was the night. I don't think they forgot; it has been posted in their front yard for two weeks. , \ r""- ,.. The Walkers were rather conspicuous by their absence. It would appear that the Walkers were avoiding this meeting; which would only build the case that they are, unfortunately, attempting to use this residence as a business. This is both unfair to your staff, the City Council, and the residents of the community. This situation has created quite a problem for the community, the Walkers, the City Council, and your department. I would think that some actions should be taken to avoid this type of problem in the future. You may not believe there is a problem; however, when SO citizens attend a city council meeting to express their concerns, this could be recognized as a problem. The City's policy concerning landmarks should be reviewed. Some restrictions or requirements surrounding the use of landmarks should be investigated. A Conditional Use Permit or other permit should be required at the time of the landmark designation, if a business is the ultimate intended use of the property. This would at least eliminate the appearance of collusion between the City and a business. Additionally, it should be determined if the Walkers were either promised or believed that obtaining the landmark designation would simplify placing a business at this residence. This should also be addressed, if true. 1 realize the City would like to encourage property owners to apply for landmark designations, not discourage them with new rules. Adding additional restrictions may even reduce the number of applicants. However, to be fair to the community and the property owners, I think this should be investigated. Again, please understand that it is the protection of our neighborhood and community that I am concerned about, not the blocking of a landmark and all the hard work your department has done. I believe that if your neighborhood were faced with the same situation as mine, you and the members of the City Council would react in the same marmer. Sincerely, ~2+-_ Robert Pasma. . , r (eljJrJs, Y-05~fe-"'~.J M ~je Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak to you tonight. My name is Bob Pasma. I live at 6009 Burgandy Ave, with my wife and four sons. for !ftf/ f S T!:-- ) ;200 I 'i I have written to all the council members in regards to the historic designation of the Krysto house. I would also like to thank the Mayor for his return phone call; I appreciate his attention in this matter. Tonight I would like to reiterate and to clarify my position in case some of you may have not received my letter. What is being decided tonight is the designation of the Krysto House as a historic landmark. What I believe the purpose of a landmark designation is to preserve the historic heritage of a community. What you have heard, or will be hearing tonight, is the true purpose of this landmark designation is probably more to promote a business and the personnel gain of one individual, than it is about preserving the Historic Heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. Location of a business at this location would be detrimental to the neighborhood and surrounding community. It would result in increased traffic, noise and a signifant change, in an area that is zoned low-density housing. My neighborhood is in the community of northwest Rancho Cucamonga. This is a community, which The City Rancho Cucamonga is fostering and I believe is trying to preserve. Many of the people in my neighborhood have dedicated their lives and careers to the community. In my immediate neighborhood there are teachers, a vice principal, a fireman, a policeman, a law enforcement officer, and a minister. My family attends Hillside Community Church. I am the Cub Master for Pack 628 and also a den leader. Don down the street is also a Den leader. These 'are families that are concerned about their homes and their community. This is a quiet neighborhood; families care and lookout for each other, children safely play together in the streets. This is a neighborhood of homes, not houses. This neighborhood is just a snapshot of a larger community, called Rancho Cucamonga. This is what is important to preserve. I understand the importance of preservation of landmarks to preserve the heritage of a community. As I discussed with the Mayor, My family has just 17 · returned from a 41 day vacation. (A vacation ofa lifetime) We visited many historical places on this trip: Gettysburg, Little Bighorn, The Prairie Museum in Colby Kansas, The Dalton Gang Hideout, The Ingles Home in Kansas, The Ingles Home in South Dakota, Washington DC, as weIl as many many other historic places. AIl these places had significance and left a lasting impression on my family. What would have not been as significant for my family, would be to have visited a historic landmark, only to view a restaurant, a shoe store, or in this case a Wedding Hall. What is important is the preservation of the heritage and a community, not the preservation of a structure. I know that what is being presented tonight is the designation of the Historic Landmark, and not a business. As stated by the planning commission, a conditional use permit will have to be applied for and granted if a business is to be at this residence. Also stated was granting Historic designation does not guarantee a conditional use permit. This action by this homeowner appears to be a very calculated and devious effort to turn this residence into a business. I work in Irvine. You have probably read about the turmoil surrounding the use of the El Toro Marine base as a commercial airport. The residence of Orange County have voted down the use ofEl Toro as a commercial airport, however there are members of the Orange County Board of Supervisors as weIl as some private interest groups are stilI trying to establish an airport at this location against the wiIl of the people. I am not trying to equate the possible landmark designation as the same as the instaIlation of an airport. But only to point out that in today's world of politics, lawyers, and backroom deals, there is a distrust of the system. At this time, I would request that this landmark designation be declined, until such time, as it is clearly established that the main motivation for the historic designation is for the Preservation of the Historic Heritage and Community of Rancho Cue among a and not for the personnel gain of one individual. Thank you very much for you time. ~ J. H. BUILDERS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. 9-19-01 THIS IS A LETTER IN REGARDS TO MY lNVOL VEMENT IN THE PROJECT OF 5917 ARCHIBALD AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 1 UNDERSTAND THAT MY NAME HAS BEEN USED IN REFERENCE TO TIIE PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE CITY MEETINGS. I GOT lNVOL VED THROUGH A FRIEND OF MINE AT CHURCH, JOHN WHO I PLAYED BASEBALL WITH. HE TOLD ME HIS INLAWS HAD PURCHASED AN OLD HISTORIC HOME ON A COUPLE OF ACRES AND TIIEY NEEDED SOME WORK DONE. WHEN I WENT TO MEET JOE AND lL. WALKER TIIEY IMPRESSED ME AS BEING VERY FRlENDL Y AND OPEN PEOPLE. J.t. SHOWED ME HER HOME > AND WAS AMAZED AS A BUILDER, WHAT HAD BEEN DONE WITH THIS OLD HOME AND THE HISTORY AND STORIES TOLD OVER THE YEARS. WHEN TIIEY TOLD ME OF THEIR BUSINESS BEING OF WEDDING'S, RECEPTIONS AND CATERING I WAS VERY IMPRESSED. J.L. TOLD ME SHE WOULD LOVE TO POSSffiL Y TURN THIS HOME INTO A BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC HOME FOR WEDDINGS AND RECEPTIONS AND IT SOUNDED LIKE A GREAT IDEA. SO SHE CALLED TIIE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF R.C. AND TIIEY WERE BEHIND HER 100%. TIIE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ALSO SAID THAT TIIE SIZE OF TIIE LOT AND THE SET BACKS WERE ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH POSSffiL Y PUTTING , A RECEPTION HALL IN TIIE REAR OF 'fHIi PROPERTY IF THEY MET ALL TIIE CRITERIA OF TIIE CITY. lL. HAD A DREAM OF MAKING THIS OLD RUN DOWN AREA,INTO A BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC HOME WITH A RECEPTION HALL,FOR SMALL CLASSY WEDDINGS. BUT FROM TIIE INFORMATION I AM GETTING THIS DREAM HAS BECOME A NIGHTMARE. I PERSONALLY HAVE NOT BEEN frIVOL 'lED IN ANYTHING FOR OVER A YEAR;AND FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND TIIE WALKERS ARE TRYING TO MAKE TIIE HOME HISTORIC WITH NO INTENTIONS OF BUILDING ANYTHING IN TIIE REAR OF TIIE HOME/AT THIS TIME. ONE THING I DO KNOW IS THE WALKERS ARE GOOD HEARTED PEOPLE/ THAT HAVE BEEN THROWN INTO AN ARENA OF CITY HALL TO BE DISGRACED, TALKED DOWN TO AND ACCUSED OF DOING SOMETHING WRONG. NEIGHBORS, CITY COUNSEL MEMBERS, LOCAL PAPER WRITERS AND FRIENDS, I ASK YOU HOW IS WRONG lO HAVE A DREAM. NOW MAYBE TIIE WALKERS PICKED THE WRONG NEIGHBORHOOD TO HAVE A DREAM IN,BUT DON'T FAULT THEM FOR THAT. 1656 W. 9th St.. St.. E. Uplalld, California 91786 Bus. Lie #493488. Office: (909) 946-8569. Fax: (909) 931-27/7 .~.. ~.. J.Il. BUILDERS '. " . .' ,".. :. ISN'T 'THAT WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT, WH:ERE A PERSON CAN COME OUT OF THE GUTTER AND MAKE SOMETHING FOR THEMSELVES OR PEOPLE CAN COME FROM OTHERS COUNTRIES, START A BUSINESS AND NOT BE .rtJDGED. .. . . . IN THE. OLD DAYS IFA PERSON HAD A PROBLEM WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR THEY WOuLD KNOCK ON THE DOOR AND TALK ABOUT IT AND COME TO REASONABLE AGREEMENT. I WISH SOME NEIGHBORS WOULD KNOCK ON JOE ANDJ.L.'S DOOR AND REALIZE THEY WOULD WELCOME YOU WITH OPEN ARMS:. ..: ... .. . . .. .. .. . THE WALKERS NEVER TRIED TO lllDE ANY OF THEIR INTENTIONS WITH UIEIR.HOME,AND I OPENLY TALKED WITH SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS ABOUT \VlIAT W AS GOING ON. THE CITY WAS BEIllND THEM_ r i Ii _ ~. WITH ALL THE DEVASTATION BACK EAST OUR COUNTRY IS COMING TOGETHER MORE THAN EVER IN THESE TOUGH TIMES. IT WOULD BE NICE TO SEE US GET BACK TO OUR ROOTS OF LOVE THY NEIGHBOR INSTEAD OF A CITY HALL CIRCUS OF ATTORNEYS, PUT DOWNS, . , . UNTRUST AND BACKST ABBING. . . . . . THE WALKERS WOULD NEVER KNOWINGLY DO ANYTIllNG TO UPSET. . THEIR NEIGHBORS. THIS IS THEIR HOME AND :rHEY PLAN TO STAY THERE AWHILE AND WANT A GOOD REPOUR WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AND FRIENDS. I: _ ~ ... 'f ,. AI!!!Jr ...~ ~~ . BOTTOM LINE IHOPE ALL WORKS OUT FOR THE BEST, SOMEONE NEEDS . TO TAKE THE FrRST STEP AND GET RID OF THE LAWYERS AND GET BACK · TO THE ROOTS OF AMERICA. 1656 W. 9th St., Ste. E. Upland, California 91786 . Bus. Lic#493488.. Office: (909) 946-8569. Fax:.(909) 931-2717 RESOLUTION NO. 0/- 2 l>O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00369 DESIGNATING THE KRYSTO RANCH A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-152-15. A. Recitals. 1. Joseph and J.L. Walker filed an application for a Historic Landmark Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 8, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On September 5, and continued to September 19, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 1.78 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 5917 Archibald Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on September 5, and September 19, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Sianificance: Findina 1: The proposed Historic Landmark is particularly representative of a historic period, type. style, region, or way of life. FacUs: The residence identifies a historic period of the early 1900s when a large number of Russians emigrated from Russia due to civil and political unrest. FacUs: The residence identifies with the Prohibition Era and organized crime. 14{P - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. HISTORIC lANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER September 19, 2001 Page 2 Findinq 2: The proposed Historic landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common but is now rare. Factls: The residence retains the architectural character of the Arts and Crafts Movement, especially the Prairie Style. There is evidence of masonry construction that was popular in the early 1900s. Findinq 3: The proposed Historic landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Factls: The Historic landmark eligible residence is approximately 88 years old. Findinq 4: The proposed Historic landmark was connected with someone renowned or important, and/or a local personality. Factls: Dr. Krysto, a prominent member of the Alta loma Community, owned the property. Factls: The properly was owned by Frank Baumgarteker, a well-known businessman from Los Angeles. Findinq 5: The proposed Historic landmark is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. Factls: The residence and rows of Eucalyptus trees are reminiscent of the wine industry and ranching that was once a common business and land use. Factls: The residence identifies a period of time when it was considered fashionable for the state's wealthy to own and live in a home in "the country:' as well as own a house in "the city." b. Historic Architectural and Enqineerinq Siqnificance: Findinq 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual, significant, andlor uniquely effective. Factls: The engineering methods such as the second story balcony, which is cantilevered and covered by principal roof is unusual and uniquely effective in keeping the character of the structure. The fieldstone facing is a unique material and is not usually found in architecture and engineering of today's homes. IJ/7 - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER September 19, 2001 Page 3 Findina 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful andlor unusual. Factls: The fieldstone facing, as well as the Arts and Craft Movement designs are beautiful, and are not common in today's homes. c. Neiahborhood and Geoaraohic Settina: Findina 1: The proposed Historic Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Factls: The immediate vicinity of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road exhibits three other historical resources: The Demens Tolstoy House, the Grandma Issak House, and the Towes House to the north. The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of architectural trends throughout the Alta Lorna area in the early 1900s, and historical continuity of the neighborhood. 4. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on September 5, and September 19, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to the Council policy regarding Historic Landmark Designation, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: 5. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 19th day of September, 2001, the Landmark Application. . 7. The Council authorizes the Mayor to certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: William J. Alexander, Mayor /q~ - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 - J.L. WALKER September 19, 2001 Page 4 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, Debra Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: /'11 - o F -1< - ".;;;.c.;;,"F....;;: '.<:'.1i":-:.;.o.;z~9"o,);::~':..,>,.t .-''''''''','..ic;;; ;- RANClIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Project Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements the City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non- residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The Project/Planning Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is approximately 7,700 acres. Total project/planning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres. A Draft Environmental Impact Report and Findings of Overriding Considerations have been prepared for this Project and a final determination will be made by the City COlincil at a later date which will be separately noticed. IS!) - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 19, 2001 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission was unable to take action on this item for two reasons. First, we have not received formal notification of our Housing Element certification from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), although we have received verbal indications of acceptance following receipt of our third set of comments from the State HCD staff. Secondly, we have recently received a request from the staff of SAN BAG, Traffic and Transportation Section, regarding the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis that meets the requirements of the County Congestion Management Plan. After the resolution of these issues, this item will be re-advertised for the City Council on a later date. Respectfully submitted, - Brad Buller City Planner BB:LH\ls /5/ - THE CITY OF fi",i>.ijji_J<lw.fa,=~.- _]1m~ J~., w...",;S!h'ilibY_~l!~_ RANCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 19, 2001 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Engineer FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. - A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE. APN: 209-211-17, 30, AND 31 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05 - HOGLEIIRELAND, INC. - A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5 TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE. APN: 209- 211-17,30, AND 31 RECOMMENDATION On June 13, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 00-04 and Development Code Amendment No. 00-05 and approved issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which required imposing the following mitigation measures on related development: If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said General Plan amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be re~uired to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for yt Street west of the railroad spur. /52. - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 00-04 & DCA 00-05 HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Description of Proiect: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 00-65 - Hermosa Distribution Center - The proposed project, which received Planning Commission approval on June 27, 2001, is the construction of a new 405,970 square foot concrete tilt-up industrial building on 19.24 acres of vacant land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue north of 6th Street. The proposed warehouse will be used for storage and distribution. Site development will occur in one phase. General Motors Corporation is the identified tenant of the facility. Use of the warehouse will be consistent with permitted uses set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 5, General Industrial. The project will require the Amendments to the Circulation Element of the General Plan and Amendment to the Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Area Districts, to eliminate the proposed continuation of th Street from its current terminus (east of Archibald) to Hermosa Avenue. B. Surroundiml Land Uses and Setting: The 19.24-acre site is located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 6th and th Streets. It is bounded on the north by vacant land followed by the Biane Brothers Winery and on the south by two General Industrial buildings. The site is bordered on the west by an existing railroad spur followed by vacant land and a multi-tenant industrial complex. The east side of Hermosa is currently vacant, but another industrial project is under review across the street. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Staff reviewed Part I of the Initial Study completed by the applicant, and staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential impacts related to traffic congestion. A Congestion Management ProgramlTraffic Impact Analysis (CMPITIA) was prepared to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMPITIA concluded that the project will not result in traffic congestion at the study area intersections. The mitigation measures for the project require the following condition: If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code Amendment, that the elimination of this portion of th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for th Street west of the railroad spur. 153 - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 00-04 & DCA 00-05 HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 3 BACKGROUND AND CONCLUSION A Traffic Impact Analysis (dated December 2000) was prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. to determine potential circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of the ih Street extension to Hermosa Avenue. The analysis considered impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions in the year 2020 at the build-out of the General Plan circulation system without the ih Street extension. The analysis examined evening peak hour levels of service for existing conditions, existing plus project, Year 2020 and Year 2020 plus project conditions for the following intersections: Archibald Avenue/8th Street, Archibald Avenue/6th Street, Hermosa Avenue/8th Street, and Hermosa Avenue/6th Street. The Traffic Impact Analysis concluded that the project would not create any significant impacts at any of the previously listed intersections. A memo dated March 29, 2001, from LSA to the applicant, indicated that there is an expected decrease in the number of daily trips from what was projected in the December 2000 traffic study. Based on the recent warehousing/distribution trend in development within the project vicinity, an overall reduction in traffic generation has occurred within the project area as distribution land uses, as compared to industrial land uses, have lower trip rates. LSA concluded that not only will the proposed project not have an impact on existinglprojected traffic within the area as previously thought, but will actually have less traffic then previously projected and an overall improved condition compared to the December 2000 Traffic Study. The elimination of ih Street along the north boundary of this development would compromise the ability of the adjacent property to the north (APN 209-211-17) to be subdivided in the future. Subarea 5 allows a minimum lot size of one acre. The adjacent parcel contains 14.2 acres, but only 300 feet of frontage on Hermosa Avenue. The applicant has provided a letter from the owner of the north boundary property. In this letter (attached), the owners state they have no objections to the elimination of ih Street as proposed by the applicant and also no objection to leaving only 300 feet of frontage along Hermosa Avenue. Right-of-way for ih Street has already been dedicated for a distance of 1,280 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The currently installed segment exceeds the City's 600-foot limitation on cul-de-sac lengths and was designed (Drawing 907) to be extended to Hermosa Avenue. If elimination of the planned street extension is approved, the existing portion of ih Street shall be retrofitted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Chief. I~L/ - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 00-04 & DCA 00-05 HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE These items have been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the property site. ACTION If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation and staffs analysis, and believes the proposed land use is preferable to existing General Plan and Development Code requirements, then it would be appropriate for the City Council to approve General Plan Amendment No. 00-04 through adoption of the attached ordinance and approve Development Code Amendment No. 00-05 through adoption of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, -r- ~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:sc Attachments: Resolution No. 01-55, Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-56, Planning Commission Figure 11I-3 of General Plan (Exhibit "A") Figure 17.30.080-G of Development Code (Exhibit "B") Aerial Photo Specific Plan Amendment Site Plan Letter from north property owner Ordinance for GPA 00-04 Resolution for DCA 00-05 /55 - RESOLUTION NO. 01-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. Hogle/Ireland, Inc. has filed an application for General Plan AmendmentNo. 00-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjed General Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and conctuded said hearing on that day. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and 150 - f PLANNING COMMISSIO" RESOLUTION NO. 01-55 GPA 00-04 - 2000 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE June 13, 2001 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together will all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring Program Qttached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain' significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed below as conditions of approval. 1) If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said General Plan amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminuS for 7th Street west of the railroad spur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 00-04 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1S-7 - PLANNING COMMISSId.. .{ESOLUTION NO. 01-55 GPA 00-04 - 2000 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE June 13, 2001 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: rryT. ATTEST, ~ ~rad Buller, tary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:. MACIAS I~S - City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 00-04, Development Code Amendment 00-05, and Development Review 00-65 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1 . Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Fonn will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /&9 - Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicantto post any necessary funds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 1:\FINAlICEOAIMMP Form-rev.wpd /~D 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 -, ~ , I :IPLANNINGIFINAlIPLNGCOMMlENVOOClOROO-65MMPChklsl.doc ~ ~ - COD - Community Development CP - City Planner or designee CE - City Engineer or designee BO- PO- FC- Key to Checklist Building Official or designee Police Capteln or designee Fire Chief or designee B. Prior To Construotlon C . Throughout Conslruotlon o - On Completion E - Operating B C o - 00_ Inspection - OIher Agoncy Penn" I Approval . Plan Chect< Separate Subml\lal (Reports I Studl.. Withhold Recordation of Anal Map 2 - Withhold Gredlng or Building Permll 3 . Withhold Certificate of Occupancy Plans) 4 - Stop Wori< Order 5 ~ Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 - Revoke CUP - , '. RESOLUTION NO. 01-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT O~S, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE A. Recitals. 1. Hogle/Ireland, Inc. has filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-05, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application.' 2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that day. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined - and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. Code; and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development j(P3 - PLANNING COMMISSIc.. . RESOLUTION NO. 01-56 DCA 00-05 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. June 13, 2001 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together will all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring Program, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and further, this Commission has revieWed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Dedaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all Significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are . listed below as conditions of approval. 1} If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for 7th Street west of the railroad spur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d} of TiUe 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. 00-05 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. jiP'! - PLANNING COMMISSld,. RESOLUTION NO. 01-56 DCA 00-05 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. June 13, 2001 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NONE MACIAS' , . ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: j(P5 - ., City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 00-04, Development Code Amendment 00-05, and Development Review 00-65 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1 . Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring . progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 . A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /(P(p - .~ " Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The.project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants anellor pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\FINALICEOAIMMP Form.rev.wpd jiP1 I III) (INITIAL STUDY PART nc. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST HQ Applicant: DR 00-65 Project File No,: 2 AlC Review of plans Date: Debra Meill[ The site shall be treeted with water or other soli stabilizing agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM" emission. in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. nitial Study Prepared by: 2 AlC Review of plans C CP Hermosa Avenues shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM" emisslcns associated with vehicle traCking of soil off~site. The site access haul will be watered a minimum of twice dally. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 2 AlC Revlew of plans C CP Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 2 AlC Review of plans C CP Chemical soli stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD end RWQCB) shal be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or mors to reduce PM,o emissions. 2 2 AlC AlC Review of pions Review of plans BIC BlC CP CP , 5 miles per hour on Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy effic;ency. All construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Vehicle speeds will be restricted to less than unpaved portions of the site. 2 C Review of plans B CPICE Contractor shall utilize electric or clean attematlve fuel powered equipment where feasible. 2 C Review of plans B CP shu10ff that work crews w11! Grading plans shall include a statement equipment when not in use, 2 '-. ~ ~ 2 C C Review of plans Review of pions B CP The contractor will implement ride-share incentives and other programs to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership rate. II the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination 01 thIs portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-aI-way lor ond construct a cul.de-sac terminus lor 7" Street west of the railroad spur. I 1.Wlthl 2 . Withhold Grading or Building Perml 3 . Withhold Certlflcata of Occupancy A . On-site Inspection B . Other Agency Permit! Approval C - Plan Check o - Separate Submittal Stop Work Order Retain Deposit or Bonds Revoke CUP Plans) -H- 6 Studies! (Reports CP - City Planner or designee To Construction CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction BO - Building OffIcial or designee o - On CompleUon PO . Police Captain or designee E - Operating FC - Fire Chle' or designee I :IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMIENVOOClDROO-65MMPChkist.doc ........ ~ ~ I Figure 11I-3 CIRCULATION PLAN PROPOSED R.D.W. LOCATION COLLECTOR -------- SECONDARY ------ MAJOR ARTERIAL ......... MAJOR DIVIDED -- -- ARTERIAL . . EXISTING INTERCHANGE o PROPOSED INTERCHANGE FREEWAY INTERCHANGE FREEWAY TO FR!I!WAY. NO LOCAL ACCESS II GRADE SEPARATION . INTERSECTION FOR POSSIBLE WIDENING - SPECIAL BOULEVARD :=;;;g SPECIAL DESIGN /;;'''''','',1 SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE r-''''-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'l r'-, ;'-'''''-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'00: .-.-.-.....-.-..... ! .... L_-' ! ! ..-.-...- '''~ r-.., I I ._._.~o, '"UU.....o....-.-.-....-.-.....-.-. , i i .-._...~. -.-, ..-l Iii ! I ..-.: ' , ; I ~------ ; ,..I ----. ! .1 l . . r ! ~ -- ! ~ ! 1 ! . ' ,\ __ i \ : , . \ ! = .... _00". ~_.. ......+ 'I ---t.. I I \ It.. "', ,.......-____ I . I .. " ___... I V---t y "r--"--"'-- , I l. ---=r I ..----- /- ----, . . i{' a ! I ! . A I I ~~ ." , , . I I ~ ' " ------, i , ~ w,_ ....." '-' = .... ....Un. ( ~~ CuR'-"" ~Rb ~'1' Cull" ~ ,...A b \..otprr.L t!n\lt~1t. L 10,000 ...t(Q....~~'1 L ;lO,C(:)\) PRDrosED PORTION-OF 7I!!~STREETTO . BE (cuqTNATE.D. . . __..J ... 'oothln "',ow - .-, AI> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA II EXHIBIT ... .- i . ! . l: I i . I . . I ! . ... \ , 6th' ......... ~ ~ - I?ROPD5ED PORTION OF yJ:il STREtT TO BE E.LlMINATE:.D FIQURE 17.30.060- G ~[1J~~~~ ~ Revised 411/92 CIRCULATION TRAILS/ROUTES LJ 12O'1\0.W. o 0 0 0 PalESTRIAN n !lRIDGE 100' R.o.W. . . . IIIC"/CLE -+ ACCESS POIfTS 88' OR lESS A.O.W. <}CO REGIONAL MULTHlSI; OOPAAK ~ ~ F'- SPECIAL STREETSCAPEJ LANDSCAPIlG RAIL. SERVICE <S>_STATION U'TUTY EASEMENT I IIIII1 EXlSTlNG I'OWERUNE 111111111 PIlOPOSEo .. ____ CREEKS & CHANNELS o FIRE STATION @ coo' 000' 1000' EXHIBIT 1&8" 0 Note: P.rcet line. .nd lot conngur.tions .re shown 85 approximations only. lThe .Ite. .hown mIIy not be currently owned nor Is the location sIte specific. The depiction of II site Is en Indication of B projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. /1/ - ,.. r "$ _L 'I ~ '. , , "" , ' , .. - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SITE PLAN I ."",....-----'-1-.......... ".. I......... ./ VACANT I INDUSTRIAL ". / OEV. OIST.: Q . I DElI. OIST.: Q / I ril I __ ~__lt~5 -r I I I ~: I " ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ : , I ,--...1 i CI) ll)' ~ I VACANT ~ ~ I DElI. OIST.: GI ~I V) \ - VACANT , I OEV. OIST.: CI I I --------r- . , 'SUBJECT INOl/ST8IAl I OEV. OIST.: . CI " f I '. I .~ -~--------'_____~____J~ PROI'ERTY NY.~": I~ r--------l-- VACANT I,.. "r----r- DEV. OIST.: Q '-:I _ ~..:: ~ I INOU5T1fAL c::i ~ ~ I DEV. 015"4: Q c::i:S: \ r I I I J "t- \ W I ~ VACANT I / \ I Q;: \f) DEV. OIST.: GI I / ~ it ----------1 ./ "- 't- INDUSTRIAL I ~ "'" _.Jlf~SLL-L _ ".. I I I I FlIlURE RIGHT-OF-WA I' IN QUESl10N I '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .A SUBAREA SOl/NOARY liNE RADIUS LIMIT liNE - - - - - - SCALE: ,-= .100' - 2-15-201 1,00PM FROM 714 258 468" . 7- 1 2-2I!l0 " 57'PH F1UA 714 268 4683 OCCI.DENTAL lune S, 2000 Herb.Me<Id Mead Investments P.o. Box 3946 ~, WA 98009 '.' ' . ReI ,.,. street Ellmll11Iltion Dear Herb: As you knoW, we are requesting the city of Rancho CUQlmonga ellmin11te the 7'" Street requiremec\t betWeen our propertIeS. FoI; city purposes, ple<ase conftrm that you agn!l! with the- eDmln3t1on of ..,... Street by sIgnItfg and yeturnlng this letter. ...... OC:oPBrll'AL SGJ) IWII....,."...,. hilt: (I. T..__lWffModtl 92'nIJ ,..........a-- "14n,,...c'lIt Tdt-.wa: lI4ru....m P 2 P.4 J7Lf - . 08/02/2001 16:18 FAX 949 622 1951 OPI'S wEST Jal002 OPUI We. CDrpDnUD. . OPUs. Suite80ll 2020 Main Street Irvin.. Ca6fomia 92614 949-522.1950 Fax949-6Z2.1951 August 2, 2001 Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 RE: Seventh Street Extension at Hermosa Avenue Oear Brad: Opus West Corporation has recently opened escrow to purchase approximately 20 acres of land along Hermosa Avenue, north of Sixth Street, for the purpose of developing an approximate 410,000 sq. ft. build-to-suit distribution facility for a Fortune 500 company. In the event the City moves forward with the extension of Seventh Street, it would involve the taking of a portion of the south side of this property. which would significantly impact the proposed development, and result in our client looking elsewhere to develop their facility. For your reference, the Assessor's Parcel Numbers for the approximately 20-acre site are A.P ,N, 0209- 211-13, -16 and -17. The current ownership of this property is Seventh Street. LtC. Opus West Corporation and our client hope that the City will not move forward with any plans to extend Seventh Street in this area, so that we may move forward with the development of the facility within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This client is very interested in Rancho Cucamonga because of the clean. safe environment, many area amenities, its strategic location, and this particular site has rail service. The client must have rail service, and it has become increasingly more difficult to find larger industrial-zoned parcels with active rail service available. Our client is a well-known national corporation that is desirous of a long-term lease commitment within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On behalf of Opus West Corporation, I thank you in advance for your consideration to our planned development. I understand the ownership to the south has a similar issue If you need any addWonal information from me, please feel free to give me a call at 949-622-3453. yours, . Halverson or, Real Estate Development CBHlcfe Cc: Paul Marshall, OWC Archirects. Contractors. Developers Opus West Corporafion is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Comganies Atlanta. Austin. Chicago. Columoos. Dallas. Denvec. Ft. Lauderdale. Houston, Ind;anapolis. Kansas City, Miami. Milwaukee MlMeapolis. Orange County. Orlando. Pensaco~. Philadelphia. Phoenbl. Portland. Sacramento. San francisco. Seattle. Tampa. Washington. O.C /15 - RESOLUTION NO. D/-21'-/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE A. Recitals. 1. Hoglellreland, Inc. has filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that day. 3. On the 19th day of September 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public' hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that day. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located with the City; and b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. t'lIP - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DCA 00-05 - HOGLEIIRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed below as conditions of approval. 1) If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of ih Street is justified, this 111 - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DCA 00-05 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 3 developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for ih Street west of the railroad spur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment No. 00-05 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. l11 ORDINANCE NO. 6 70 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. Hoglellreland, Inc. has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 00-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above- referenced General Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 01-55, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment No. 00-04. 3. On the 19th 'day of September 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that day, 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properly located with the City; and b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. /11 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. GPA 00-04 - HOGLEIIRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This ordinance does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This ordinance does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral 'reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed below as conditions of approval. 1) If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said General Plan amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this , "., /C[l) - CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. GPA 00-04 - HOGLE/lRELAND, INC. September 19, 2001 Page 3 developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) ofTitle 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 00-04 by the adoption of the attached City Council Resolution. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance I~I - RANCHO CUCAMONGA COIOIUNITY SERVICES Staff Report DAlE: TO: September 19, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update BACKGROUND In. accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues. programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Hermosa Park: . The new play equipment for the tot lot ADA improvement project has been ordered. Four to six weeks will be required for the manufacturing and shipping of the equipment. Installation of the equipment is anticipated to occur by the end of September. Ralph M. Lewis Park: . Construction of the park is proceeding well. The contractor is currently working on installation of the irrigation system, as well as the hardscape, including concrete walks and planter walls. Heritage Park: . Bid opening is scheduled for September 11, 2001. Council award is anticipated to occur on October 3"'. /~2- I""'" CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19, 200 1 Red Hill Park: . Park crews installed new goal posts on both soccer fields. This completes the soccer field renovation project. . The Community Services Department storage building footings and block work is underway. Miscellaneous: . On Saturday, July 28th, approximately 200 volunteers planted 38 24-inch box trees, 202 5-gallon shrubs, spread 40 cubic yards of mulch, and placed 17 tons of cobblestone into 17 cubic yards of mortar as part of the San Bernardino Road re-Iandscaping project. . Installation of the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations is proceeding. Red Hill Park, 9th Street Corporate Yard and the Civic Center sites are complete. Trenching is currently occurring at Milliken Park. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: . A grand Hosoitalitv BBa Dinner and Game Show will be offered to regulars and new visitors of the Senior Center on Wednesday, September 19th, at 5:00 p.m. This speCial event is provided free to all participants. . The annual V.I.P. Picnic will be held at Red Hill Park on Thursday, September 20th, at 10:00 a.m. . The Autumn Leaves Fashion Show will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday, October 20, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. The program will be highlighted by new fall and winter fashions modeled by several of the Center's seniors. A light salad lunch and entertainment will also be provided. Don't miss this spectacular event that is co-sponsored by the VIP Club as a fundraiser. Tickets are $5 per person. . The Senior Halloween Soooktacular will be held at the Senior Center on October 24, 2001. at 10:00 a.m. Seniors are invited to come in costume. There will be prizes and games for the mature ghosts and goblins. There will also be plenty of food, entertainment and scary fun. This event is co-sponsored by the VIP Club. . Flu Clinic and Health Fair - The Senior Center has teamed up with San Antonio Community Hospital and San Bernardino County Department of Public Health for the Center's Annual Flu Clinic and Health Fair, to be held at the Senior Center on Saturday, November 3, 2001. San Antonio Community Hospital will administer the flu shot clinic. This free event was originally scheduled for October 13th, but the availability of vaccine was delayed for the second consecutive year because of a national shortage. The Health Fair will feature 25 - 30 vendors with demonstrations, health screenings and display booths to inform the publiC on various senior health and social service items. -2- 1~3 - CITY COUNCIL PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19. 2001 . The next regular meeting of the Senior Advisorv Committee will be held on Monday, September 24, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Discussion topics will include: (1) Presentation on the "Safe Return Program", (2) Update on the Senior Center Action Plan, (3) report on the Conference on Aging, (4) Senior Health Fair and Flu Shot Clinic, (5) Veterans' Day Tribute and (6) information on the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. Human Services: . Beat the Heal, September 17th, 10:00 a.m. The Visiting Nurses Association will sponsor a free lecture on how to stay cool and avoid afflictions such as heat exhaustion, rashes and dehydration. . Bereavement Suooort GrouD - West End Family Counseling Services will sponsor a free six- week support group for those suffering loss. This service will begin on September 19th, at 10:00 a.m. Pre-registration is required. . Dr. Cohen in the Eveninc - Provides free health related lectures on topics of interest on every third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. Walk-ins are welcome. On September 19th, Dr. Cohen will speak on Urinary Incontinence. . Prevention Plus - will offer low cost screenings for stroke, vascular disease and osteoporosis, as well as EKG testing, on September 28th, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Pre-registration is required. . The Doctor Is In - Dr. Cohen will provide free health related lectures every third Tuesday of the month at 12:00 noon. Upcoming lectures include, Medication Interactions on September 18th and High Blood Pressure, on October 16th. Walk-ins are welcome. . Elder Abuse Presentation - The Office of the District Attorney will be offering a free presentation on elder abuse. The topics included in the presentation will be: theft or embezzlement of property, mental suffering and various types of abuse. Pre-registration will be required. This program will take place on October 5, 2001, from 9:00 until 1 0:00 a.m. . HICAP WorkshoD - A 2-hour workshop will be offered by the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program on October 29th from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :00 a.m. This free presentation will cover topics such as Supplemental Insurances and Medi-Care and HMO's. Registration is required. . Safe Return Procram - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center is now a registration site for The Alzheimer's Association Safe Return program. Safe Return is a nation wide identification support and registration program working at the community level. The program provides assistance whether a person becomes lost locally or far from home, 24 hours, every day. Registration is $40.00, which includes an identification bracelet and monthly newsletter. Trips and Tours: . Santa Barbara Harvest Moon Festival - September 22. Join us as we wander through beautiful Oak Park for one of the many fantastic festivals in Santa Barbara. You'll enjoy enterlainment, fabulous food, crafts, fresh produce and shopping. -3- j'ltf CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 . Desert Hills Premium Outlets ICabazonl and Oak Glen - October 6. This is your chance to get some early holiday shopping done. The Cabazon outlets include scores of stores featuring clothing, luggage, house wares, home furnishings, specialty items and food. We'll stop at Oak Glen on the way home for some additional shopping in apple country. . Oktoberfest in Aloine Village - October 24. Let's go to the home of the Oktoberfest - Alpine Village. Enjoy great entertainment, lunch (on us), shopping (on your own), and a bakery and deli. . Nethercutt Collection - November 3. Join us for a 2-hour guided tour of this unique collection of "functional fine art," including classic automobiles, antique furniture and musical instruments. Appropriate dress required (no shorts). No flash photography. On the way home we'll stop at the Farmer's Market for some shopping. Volunteer Services: . The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usaae for the month of July and year-to-date. MONTH: JULY 2001 YEAR TO DATE #of # of Hours #of # of Hours Volunteers $ Value Volunteers $ Value Admin 5 15 210 30 65 910 Sports 266 1,506 21,084 1,514 20,765 290,710 Sr & Human 62 448.5 6,279 476 1,736.5 24,311 Services Special 47 214 2,996 133 558 7,812 Events Youth 13 94 1,316 107 807 10,178 Programs 393 2,278 31,885 2,265 23,947 334,131 'DoIlar vaJua baseel on $14.00 par hour. Teens: . Teen Recreation Activitv Club - TRAC volunteers had a busy summer schedule of staffing snack bars, exciting field trips and many opportunities to earn volunteer hours. TRAC teens earned free trips by getting involved with the TRAC summer snack bars and joined in the excitement of making a difference in their community. TRAC teens were busy all summer selling snacks at Alta Loma High School swimming pool Movies in the Park and Concerts in the Park series. There were over 658 TRAC teens volunteering for the month of August. Eight hundred and -4- /~5 CITY COUNCIL PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19. 200 1 twenty-five (825) community residents were served by the TRAC teens at the Alta Loma High School swimming pool this summer. · The Teen Learnino Center (TLC) gave 31 teens an opportunity to volunteer working at different City summer program sites to gain on-the-job-skills. . The Teen Center expanded its hours of operation during the summer months. The summer hours were Monday through Thursday from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and on Friday from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Over 1,200 teens enjoyed the Teen Center throughout the summer months. The fall hours for the Teen Center are: Monday through Thursday from 2:30 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. and Friday from 2:30 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. . Coming up teen events include: October 6th -- Knott's Berry Scary Farm, Annual College Fair -- October 18th and Halloween Dance -- October 27th. · Teens had the opportunity to join us as we visited a wide variety of fun filled places this summer. We offered teen field trios to Knott's Berry Farm (33 teens attended), Balboa Beach (15 teens attended), Universal Studios (29 teens attended), Magic Mountain (48 teens attended), Huntington Beach (15 teens attended), Pharaoh's Lost Kingdom (35 teens attended), Disneyland (26 teens attended) and for the grand trip, a week long summer camping trip to Campland on the Bay at Mission Bay (21 teens attended). . Skate Facility - The skate facility at Spruce Avenue Park has been very busy the month of August. Over 2,525 youth enjoyed our skate facility during the month. The next skate safety demonstration will be held November 3, 2001. Youth: · The Fun on the Run mobile recreation unit was out at our community parks this summer. The program served over 900 youth during the month of August. The summer hours for the morning program were 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon, Monday through Friday at the following locations: Monday, Lions Park, Tuesday, Mountain View Park, Wednesday, Beryl West Park, Thursday, Golden Oak Park and Friday Victoria Groves Park. The summer aftemoon hours were 1 :00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday at the following locations: Monday, Bear Gulch Park, Tuesday, Coyote Canyon Park, Wednesday, Hermosa Park, Thursday, Old Town Park and Friday, Windrows Park. The program was well received and appreciated by the community. The Mobile Recreation program also entertained over 250 youngsters at the Route 30 Freeway grand opening. · Summer Camo Cucamonga - Camp Cucamonga was offered at Alia Lorna High School, through August 24th, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Campers had the opportunity to play games and sport activities, make art and craft projects, swim at the pool on twice each week and go on weekly field trips. Camp Cucamonga provided positive summertime activities to 42 campers each week throughout the summer. · Summer Kids Exolorers - Our summertime Kids Explorers program was offered at Vineyard Junior High School through August 24th. This half-day program entertained over 48 youth each -5- !<liP CiTY COUNCIL PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19. 200 1 week. Youngsters were given an opportunity to participate on Monday and Wednesday's or Tuesday and Thursday's. Participants explored a variety of activities each week centered on a different theme. . The Plavschool program starts its fall session Dn September 10, 2001, with over 480 young children, ages 1-5, registered in the program's classes. Youth Enrichment Services (YES) Grant: . The number of YES program participants is growing everyday. The program offers many different types of familv classes for parents with young children ages 0 to 5 years old. This summer parents were given an opportunity to participant in many free classes pertaining to youth such as: Accountability Concepts (35 adults attended), Computer Classes (30 - 35 participants), Earthquake Ready Class (12 participants), Home Crime Prevention (6 participants), Car Seat Safety Class (6 participants), Car Seat Safety Check (110 participants) and Coupon Savings Class (60 participants). · Parents have also been given an opportunity to participate at our Family Assistance. Comouter. Training. and Services (FACTS) Center. The FACTS Center allows parents to learn and access the Internet to assist them in becoming a better parent. We teach parents how to access different programs available on the Internet so they can provide more opportunities for their children and families. The FACTS Center also gives parents an opportunity to learn to read and write better through our Family Literacy Program. Statistics on the usage of our FACTS Center for the summer months are: 400 visitors in June, 600 visitors in July and 700 visitors in August. . The YES Program is currently preparing to open its second location at the City's Lion East Community Center. Youth Sports: . The next meeting of the Soorts Advisory Committee will be on October 10, 2001. Field request material for the Spring/Summer 2002 (February 1-July 31, 2002) will be due at this meeting. . The table below summarizes vouth soorts activities for the reporting period: # Particl ants 375 165 760 60 161 irls # Teams 38 12 68 6 19 Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates soort fields for non-orofit organized vouth soort leaaues. For the reporting period, 12 sport groups utilized 18 city parks and had 60,964 participants and 101,470 spectators. -6- 1<?7 CITY COUNCIL PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19. 2001 RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides droo-in/ooen olav participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activi Adult Basketball Youth Basketball Adult Ra uetball Youth Ra uetball Adult Volle ball Youth Volle ball Jazzercise # Partlci ants 501 556 512 45 14 8 1,129 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult soorts activities for men and women for the reporting periOd: Activi # Partici ants # Teams Gender Softball 2,560 160 Male/Female Fla Football 60 8 Male Soccer 672 42 Male/Female Tennis 28 n/A Male/Female · Three adult softball tournaments will be held during the month of September at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex. Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy: · Workshoos/Productions - The Vocal Expression and Performance class, Television Commercial workshops and Multi-Media Aft class have just ended their summer 2001 session. During the summer a total of 44 community members participated in our programs. Classes for the fall session have just begun. Currently we have 41 participants enrolled. · Over 1,300 community members came out to support the City's first children's musical, Annie. The professional youth theater production was a first rate. quality show that gave youngsters, ages 8-18, the opportunity to showcase their singing, dancing and acting talents. Show dates were on August 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12 at the Alta Loma High School Auditorium. Our young and talented youth put on a terrific show that received standing ovations. It was a wonderful experience for all those involved. Community Wide Special Events: · The City of Rancho Cucamonga's farmers market, Harvest Tuesdavs has been doing wonderfully. The fun happens every Tuesday evening from 5:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. through September 25, 2001 at the Orchard Plaza Parking lot on Foothill and Vineyard. Join us at the market and check out the fresh fruits and veggies, entertainment, Kids Groove and quality hand made crafts! -7- / tj<J CiTY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 · Over 7,000 residents came out to enjoy our free Movies in the Park series. This summer's lineup for movies included: Dinosaur, Chicken Run, 102 Dalmatians, The Kid. The Road to EI Dorado and the Tigger Movie. Movies were held at Milliken Park on Monday evenings, Windrows Park on Wednesday evenings and Red Hill Park on Friday evenings from July 9th through August 17, 2001. . Concerts in the Park were held on Thursday evenings beginning July 12th through August 30th at the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. Eight thousand (8,OOO) community members enjoyed our lineup of talent that was filled with great music for all to enjoy. This year's schedule included: The Silverados (top 40/country music); Upstream (reggae and calypso music); Head First (classic rock); Ramon & the L.A Band (Oldies and Motown sounds); Raging Sun (jazz/blues music); Reno Jones (R&B and jazz sounds); Marshal Law (country/rock tunes); and the series ended with The Answer (classic rock music). These free concerts had the crowds up dancing and enjoying our beautiful Rancho Cucamonga summer nightsl Parks and Facilities: · Park monitors continue to offer a great service to the residents. They are out 7 -days a week to make sure all is well and safe in our local parks. The weather has made it ideal for more and more residents to enjoy our local parks. · The table below provides information on Dark reservations for the month of August 2001 : Shelter Location Attendance # of Applications Number of Hours of Use Processed Rentals Red Hill 5,415 51 Resident 58 339 Communitv Park 7 Non-Resident Heritage Community 175. 3 Resident 4 15 Park 1 Non-Resident Hermosa Park O. o Resident 0 0 o Non-Resident Coyote Canyon Park 370 6 Resident 8 37 2 Non-Resident Civic Center O. o Resident 0 0 CourtYard o Non-Resident Red Hill 1,200 3 Resident 3 15 Amohitheater o Non-Resident Total 7,160 63 Resident 71 406 8 Non-Resident .. No rentals dUB to scheduled construction. Heritage Park Equestrian Center: . Eauestrian Center usage for the months of September/October 2001 is shown in the table on the following page: -8- 'rr! CITY COUNCil PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19. 200 1 Grou Alta Loma Ridin Club Alta Loma Ridin Club 4-H Club Alta Loma Ridin Club 4-H/POA Horse Show Alta Ridin Club Risin Stars E uestrian 4-H Club Alta Loma Ridin Club Alta Loma Ridin Club 4-H Club Date Se tember 6 Se tember 16 Se tember 17 Se tember 18 Se tember 30 October 4 October 6 October 15 October 16 October 21 s October 27 Park and Recreation Commission: .m. · The next meetino of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, September 20, 2001. At this meeting the Commission is scheduled to discuss: ~ Discussion regarding noise/pollution issues associated with use of leaf blowers in City parks. ~ Discussion regarding Commission's participation in the Founder's Day Parade. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: . The following items were discussed at the Foundation's September 11, 2001, meeting: ~ Discussion regarding Founder's Gala 2001. ~ Review of prioritized action steps/board member assignments and approval of a timeline for their completion. Rancho Cucamon9a Epicenter: · The following activities took olace at the Epicenter during the reporting period: ~ Keyzone Enterprises - Japanese Baseball Uniform Catalog Photo Shoot - Epicenter Stadium - August 30/31, 2001. ~ Marz Network - Still Photo Shoot for Stock Film - Epicenter Stadium - September 8, 2001. ~ A YSO - Picture Day - Epicenter Soccer Fields - September 8, 2001. . Staff is working with representatives from the following organizations for future activities at the Epicenter: - 9- fCf!) . .... -- - .............. ~ - ./ -,.. L.. " :'.... ~ ---- - -- ,/ .... ~ ..... ... - #411 City of RCl ncho CucCl mongCl E-Government Overview ~ ~;::::.... .-, - ,... - - / ..# "~...~ "'-.'- ..... - - / :- r/ nt? E-Government IS the use of technology to enh~nce the ~ccess, ~nd delivery oF, government services to benefit citizens, businesses, ~nd employees. - me , E-Govern -- s wh~t - / - ,/ . ~ .. I:J . ~ Discuss "..1. 'lE! Edit ~ Print !Ell. Ma~ o History 'L!J Favorite1 ~ Search hlml t!elp G) Home 1001, W Refresh F ~vor~es r~ Stop ~oew ... Forward .t;di1 . file ..;... B.ck . ] Agdress irs.uslreas,gov/prodlfOfms_pubs/lndex ~ hltp://www - - .- - . t's always a good idea to stay in shape And the same holds true when t comes to tax forms and publications. When you're armed with the correct Instructions, the right forms and all the pertinent publications, your filing problems will be a lot less taxing. Exercise all your options in this section. And when Ap,,1 the 15th rolls around - which is - you'll be in fine form and Privac Please Revtew Our Securi VersJon Other Stuff About Forms and Publications leX! On CliCk for Download Current Year Forms and Publications ..:J - - 25 AM 11 -r-:"iit Internet ~MicfO$01t Ph... ,({"'~)~1iII Mielo. !Sjtnbo, ~ Forms And... ~ D~t~er ASSI$l..1 ~ Microsoft Po = ;~ Done ;flSt.,t LliJ ADSM Sche. - ,/ ...... -...... .. -- ~ " -- ........ ,/ ~..... ~ ,.# How is E-Government being used now? Down[oC1d TC1X Forms MC1ke C1ppointment C1t DMV - ~ ~jew Fi!vOf~es 1001$ ljelp III - - - ~ ~ . 'f3 [1) G) ~ w 0 [8. ~ ~ . .~ Sack FOlvl,lerd Slop Rehesh Home Search Favorites HistOfY Ma~ Print Ed< Discuss - - ------ . - - --- ~ AQdressl@] http://wwwdmv.cagov .:.J - c>i;o - ~ "- ,. d . - _.. -- - - --......=: . - - .~ ~ C.\I.I FOK:\'L\ r " r. Co 0 I U l";"-- III l;,UIUIl..NI .-. IIOMrr,cr l~ ~@}~ I "- .. ~ TIps for Mature Drivers - . ..... T. fll~x g. '~ 'our ~ What'. III.. }POWER~ ~ .----- r SearCh 1"' I . formation about ~duced Vehicle ensa Fee . SII our Fraud an jentltv Then Infl atlon Center .:J -. - .. _. - .. . f' - - - - :-Iftlllnte<nel ;~ Done -;'IlSla'II.~ ADSM Sche. ~ Disbllef ASSISl ~ Mic.osoft Po. IiS!Ilnbo, . Micro ~Mic.osolt Ph. r- ....-.-- -!!J Deparlme. :([ ~l2Ji!ZIll:19AM - -..... - --. ... ""..... ",....--. ~ .... ..... '.1- How is E-Government being used now? - Down[oqd Tqx Forms - Mqke qppointment qt DMV - Bqil you rselF out! - - - - ~ -- ," ~ .. -f';;',- I~ Discuss .~ 'l~ Edit ~ . ."",- ~,- "EO ~ .. P,;nt ___L_._~ _ ~ .~. .Mal '.' 1 J -"--" d H~tOf)l -,"-'-- . - '''''!!"",-,-~". ::::'J{ ':-:-::: ~w Search .F:avofi.te~, -----,--.,..-.-. ---- asp 'l~Fi.e .Edit VieW F~vorites Tools .- :,_7'" . """"'-- 'C.,' _ '~-:_:.,:.~e, :~.~~ _ ~,.. ,=: 'l' ..... o.r;>, l' : V.J . .....". ~ ."-.!::..J . I; . _.e.~ ..~Il;>'!ati!',.. Slop IR~~e~h_ " irJ~~~D~ h1~s:/lsecure. coIOlat"sp~n~s.c~m:paf~ic/~o~~t. Help """'A L.JJ Home - of 3 1 -- ~- --..- --- Information, Step - Customer - ne Parking Ticket Payment - On e omepage H . City SEARCH allow w Please enter the customer Information requested below. Providing an e-mail address the Cltv to send Immediate confIrmatIOn that payment was received. of a Your Privacy IS Important to us confidence and will not be re- A1llntormatlon with an 5 required to process payments the Information submitted on this form w be kept in strict distributed .'11"''' N."'il .r~Sl N.",e .WSl Add....s:s .C:t"j' . COLORADO lZl4!.ll .SI4Le ...:J G Inter,..~t ~--' --- ... g.~~riU3~~1 ",~ 01 Colol ado 5 p... -- !JCily to; ...... - --',,",~-'- -- ~ ------, '=~ ....... '!JOy 01 CoIorodo SP'inll$.. ~~ - -- .~~(i~ier Assistant 3.01 ~ .Z;pCOdil ....~-..,...:l.M " .. .P~~w_ -- ~ Done .. ~ s";;'11 \.if AOSM Schedule, - ,. - -- J' '41 what does this potentially mean to the City of Rancho Cucamonga? - ......: "~~ ~~ ...... -~ '" ,,;, It provides the opportu n ity For the City to continue to broaden the way that we provide services to oUr community, l~}) ~~:::::... -~. - -- ....... -...... . - -.,~ ~ ~ ~ ......~ -- ~ -- '..1 what are we currently doing area of E-Government? - . - / - ,/ he nt . I --- - ~ _III .nd A @ Rehesh .@J http://wwwlnstderancho.com/ - - -- ~ --- "-- - --- ,;... S.cl. ~ Discuss !i1 Ed. ~ P"nt If::). Mail ~ E!J 0 Search FavOfites: HistOfY ----~-~-_._- --- A IcLJ Home (~ Slop ----" .. Forwa:d j;dil fie J . . lA~dJess de'f'tRANCHO " '" l< ~ 0111(0. $~oes 81 Nside RANCHO is an award-wlnnmg sIte selection tool that displays maps, photographs, aerials and details on available sites. Click on the site finder to perform custom querles and calculate sIte-specific demographics to refine your search '*w In';'Jnn_~1 Sites RANCHO CUCAt.lONGA'S prime loeatlon outstanding qualil1 Of life and robust business climate have made It a hot spot in Calrfornia's $1 trillion economy. according to the l'Vall Street Journal ..:J ,illnterncl - -- ,q~(iji!Il-' - 2:00PM Crowned by majestic mountams and serviced by three major freeways and an international airport, Rancho Cucamonga is conveniently located thirty. seven mIles east of the Cil1 of Los Angeles. - -- -r-~ I I Silt! ~ El!m EmilI Em lED Em t," :@] Done :~St"lllaADS... I )j,Distille..1 !SiIlnbo,...II~IN.i... E1Telnel.1 @]Micro...lliMicro...1 R~all Ie , I RANCHO ~ .. IB Discuss ~ ~ p,Wlt Ed, ~. Mail G History tiJ Favorites @ ~ I ,t\ Slop Horne Seafch -~,-_..__. SO. 82.3/webpacllheroc. html !11 Refresh .. Forward f;dit file ~ B~ [ Agdress .1 ~2Go _.........~- -' ~ the left browser's back and rorward Use the ROC's buttons Instead the menu on Please Note Do not use your buttons to navigate through the ROC (j from ~ hltp://2091 an option Select ..:.l 2:05PM 1 riD Inler~ r -----:--- d. '-!'~l9JiiI .[ r PowerPoint r BO.1 ~Mic,o'ol 209.150. B2.1 Telnet B.1 Mi.. \II ebPAC !.l Oyni. Microsoft Outlook .~ \IIebPAC; webpac ;~St.,tl ~Inbo' , ~ ~ "'- 19TH eC BAS YA~ , A '.e f~e u , ICTOOl.,-g,. ~ - ~ o. Ir.Hll",n Je " \ .p ~. "I _. ~ eH \ \ .:J 1216PM ,.; ~ ~! ~ ' ~I > - < - = ,.,nt S1 - .~J ~ <lfH ST - - f1~' eF . - , z .0( ;; ::;: - ,:, , ~. ~I :;(1 ~ <- '" " ~Mrcroso ).Aclobal.l ~Telnel ~RCR._ ~ Inbox ;t8 Disl~Ol ~- - :!tl s~'111i.l ADSM " M RCPARK.CO Coyote Canyon Park 10987 Terra Vista Parkway ... . FOljN5fd @J http://www .- - ------ ~ :,. Back JAll<bess . ..:J 2:17PM Home. fVabJe Parks ..:.J ~'ese1\l'8ble parks I . _ Key Facilities rID java' ptne"""",'~rklaC_COyolehtm'.500.500) i I r~ Intemet :1151.111 ~ 5u. ~Distkl ~lnbo><...1 [JAmaul ).Acrobul ~Telnet.' ~Micro.lliMrclO..lI~cov_._ ~ ~~i!ll Contact Us. .. . ...'-" . , " . . , . ~ b ..~.. &-...~. Picnic tables BBQ Play area Ball field Exercise course Equestrian access Wiodow I Print . . . . . . se c ::.W2:. Jill .j:J . ~ "1>.'.t3 r:i'l ~ Back ~~~_ _ _Sl~ H~.___ }~.ddress I@J http://www.ci.r;;;;.-cucamOnga.:..dus/rndeK02.htm ~.~,._- -- --., _._~.~.- .~ . - - .}" ~~.'~"-III'(-~,~\II)I;;,,~":, . ~~ ~... ~ . \~ '- .~,. _ ,I _ _/ ~.im" - - .. -' . . ,tr. -' . ~ Discuss ~ Eod ~ PrU1t re. Mea o History W FaVOl'ites ~ Search [iJ Rehesh f:di Eae J Contents - Search - RiiEiaoieS . Preface The electronIC verSion of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code was created June, 2000 For more recent provisions, please contact the c Ity . Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shing Company. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed In any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 2000 Book Pub Copyright Preface TI E. I I shed by BPe -:J 9:33 AM Book Publishing Company 201 Westlake Avenue North Seettle VIA 98109 206-343-5700 Ii r~ Intemel 1-i.~lYJiiZI Pub Title FINANCE -:J t]Aancho Web TItle 4 (Reserved) ~MicfOsofl Power? . ;Air Distillet A..istent , >II,} "'-._'I:r... Community Profile What's New City Hall City Directory Visitor Info Job Opportunities ~Qgr;x:'un~y Calendar ~ DOne i_ Ste'll ~ ADSM Scheduler ~ .11I , ..1 ~ ~ - ~ ~I '1.=J o i$cu$s ~ .[f,1 Edit .~ P,Wlt -----... -- ~ Mail 6'~ History ;:':'." ill F aVOf~e$ ----~. . ~ Se~ch . . _.:.1 _.~ III Internet _ ---- --... ---..... q, ~l2Ii!II 3:37 PM - .-:...:;.:- = ~ "It:" ~ . , " - QJ ExplOlW>g . 3.. Job OpporluniUes The following posiUon(s) are currently open in the CIl\! of Rancho Cucamonga. For more information on the City-'s recrUItment and selectIon process, please refer to our Employment Policy Statement. For any questions or to receive an applicaUon, please call the CIl\! of Rancho Cucamonga Personnel Department at (909) 477.2700 or request an application via email. (You may download an employment application if you have the Adobe Acrobat Reader.) RECREATION LEADER (REGISTRATION) Closing date is August 30,2001 PLANNING AIDE Position is open until filled GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN Closing date is August 30,2001 ---- ~""'1!l'-: .__-_ ..:t::o__~ ,.~.. _J...__"",!,"!,.ejio~ .."..". ~DO(le_ _ . _ _ ~ - -- - -- -- - . _u. __ ,- Y:: -'-:;- =- :;;:;:;: :~ Starl/ tifADSM Sche'. ... D;;!iIIeI Assi;t. iJciIYd"Colora~lI~ !~t_e:s a.o:) ~ Microsoft Ph. I fie ~diI , . "'. ....~. .~ - ,,, is::"' jf lA~~~i~ ~UP_: Ilww~_ci.,~ncho~cuca~~~~~ca_ ~~iOb-~'~__ - -- - -w- lools Ii eIp -."" .', )1] . .GJ Refre$h Home -. -- - ---.- FSVOl~es ';:' ::":.:":.::. . rt) Slop -~ ..- VieW -. .. rar#ar~. '-'.. '--,-~- - - ~ - - ~ '-*' of the Rqncho (ucqmongq E-Govern ment eFFort: .....-....... ....... ......~..... ...... - ." -- f/ GOqlS ment Develop q short term stl-qtegy For implementing qdditionq[ E-Govern services q nd prog rq ms. v - - [ ty v - -- ~ - - , ,'" nvolved? . I ...... ~........... ... ~ ...... " 'AI;!I be 1 whu vv - - / - J/ stClFF teClm, employees Cl mCl nClgement Community Focus [ nternet/ n d City G ro up 1 ,> ....'\ Committee net ntrCl I City ....'\ nology Committee/ In novCltion City I nFormCltion Tech Deloitte Touche G rou ps ....'\ <.'\ - - - -- - .... - ..# " II n ....... --:-- ......... ~ .....~ ...... lIThe PIa - - / - ,/ nt. me E-Govern n o pC1 rties II cC1te C1 Edu " E- II II n process n the City. . I nventory existing C1nd Government projects ...' ot other cities. II best prC1ctices II Survey ...' Sol cit nput fl'om City depC1t'tments C1nd commun ty groups on possible sel'vices. - - . - ...' - Cjs --. ............. .... ":::::-..... -- ~...... .~ .. , " st or desil-ed proiects ,c " necessCjry to impl Cj..J vve ent. . I - - " -. ,'" " Develop f'eso 1I rces tize proiects. . I or . I PI' " tor n plCj Develop Cj phCjsed 0-2 yeCjr implementCjtion " Determ i ne the longer I'Cj nge projects thCjt sholl Id be i ncorporCjted into the Cit/ s long tel'm ntormCjtion Technology MCjster plCjn -- " - ~j1I ~. ~=- ~, ....... -...... .. - ........~ ". ~ - ~ ~ ....... '4#- So whC1t wi [ this C111 meC1n?.. - -- - /- ,/ Cl '\\1'/..- ------"'g.; ~ -",4'7 _ '---"" - -- :----... //", .,,'-. - - ~ - ......~ - / -- ". -- -- ~ 1/ --- - .,..., E-Government to the rescue! - '~....~ ~ ---.-- . " ....... " " t. ? Ques Ions..., - - - / -... I' VlcrORIA GARDENS MAIL BLOOMS IN RANmo CUCAMONGA \'1,1110,1 (;,mkn.._ a ~'Ifll pro,"-'l1 ot FOI\"1 Cay 1k.'\'l'lopnwnt ,md [.("",i.. Inn'\lnlt'nl (~>Il1r;In\', lJ.( ,,-twd\lhl 1<1 ol1<:n m 211>1. I' ,1.111'\I to IlI.'lul111' Rancho CULlllll.n~a\ on\ l~'\\nl"\\11 "!In" pn'I....I'.:<:I ]1;.,1([,', IJ millllm "[IWe f,.~ ofll:n.JIf prO~'l1 ",ill "fkr;1 rm.\lllfl' "I ft):i,,1tI1 .md nl'l,l.:hhorhmd f,'(:.lIl 'IIH\'\, rl"\!:'llIranl\, L!k...lifl',I~Il' ,inti t'nl,'11.1;n!lwn11N."\ llo.~,btoa"', pro- fl"'llIn:il otllu",/Iou\in).:. rilil ;md ('uJllJrJIIJ",... It ill till oUllhi.. :'If1U/Ul).: n,'\\ ~'11111).: I'arb. rbl~I' .mti P:'I'>t'l" Ipl'lblri.m \\:.llkv.;I~,II];IH' 11(\'0 mrorpor,Hl..u mlo rht, pbn. Addll\llll:.11 O[ll"f\'p:'ICl" \\'111 prol'id,' :'In'a' IIII' lill" (Hfl'4anl pfl'lo(fal1unin).: of l'I11l11ll1lnll) I'll'I11... 'lIrh :'1\ .11111<[1It' elf ,hOlI'_ ~k.1I!k!tm om,. hohlby fl'iI'hr,HIOI1\ loll' \'llrkl'lb, 10ral'..dll~II 'pOn'Ofl\1 l'\I'm, Jnd numl'/'llll' (llhl'l Jdl\itit", th/lll.lj.(h the YI';I(, 'Im;Ij.(I',ofLlllllhl"1\ I11d(I\\.,hl'PPll1g whill' \lrollmg UI1\\n lhl' rl't;lll :1\l"nllt" 1r1';IW II,illll' ()llradllJllI1JI downlown ,hoppllllo: III it, tll'Ylby,- I'~pkllm'd Bn:m ,h,m'" PR"idl.nt lit !'f'll"t l:ity Ik:\"dlpml.nt Calif1Ifl1t:I, Inr "Tlll'\'itl,'n.l C;lrJl"r\'C\!'lllml'f wI!] l.x(l.:nl'OU" J ,hopPIllJ( .Itn~>>-phl'rl' Ihall' 11111ikt' .mYlhinj.( Ilffl'fl'.j in lhl' lnbnd FmpuI' nOl\ A 1,lnl'l\" of ;lrclutl'llurl' and ,lR't.i.....JI"l\.', ;1 \Iidl' r,m!-w of nil'f.-h.mdl'l.' Illil-rinK" lu,hh- bnd,rarN.:d p.lrk- :md p.N~" ,1Ilt!:1 brJ(t' [1];11,1- \11,'n: huilding \'Illoria (;.mll'n, 10 prOlldt' tlll' utI''' R"llk.nt" 1IIIh ..hoppm!! lIpponllnitll',-;lnd.1 \\holl' In! n~)rl' TIll' multl'lI"-' projl'd wiJlmdudl' fill' m:l~lr dt'[1:1n' f11l'nt ..tnR' :mdlllf tl'rl:lIIl, (Oll'f (fIU/H.! "lIWl' In'l! and 1'i1l 'PC:ltdtl rl't.lik-r, ('ij~).i~~f "-j\l:Irl' f(,l"o \Ihidl will lkl\\ n'llor, ffom rhf<lllJ(hollt thl' region C.Ilt11hinl'u \lllh (( 11l1l111"fli:11 olli( I". hlltel, multl.f.lIllil\' rl"I\kntJ:d, U\K ,lilt! l'ntl'n,linnwnt 1l'l1\I('" \'irrori:1 (;:in.k'll' i, '1'110 1"l\'nlr1ll' the rl'l:lil ;md blJ,illl'" ]'".::11 romt 01 It1\' l'ntul' 1\I"t \Ill Ikrn;mlino \';t1Il'\, , 1 GENfRU FU~O EXI'ENlll1llRES FISf.AL YEAR100l/l001 ManningS% Sl,016,m Mainltnan~t 111% Sldll3,IOO BUi1dinjt&s.I(et)'i"\1~ Sl,OJ'I,J'IO . F.nltinttnnl& '. l'ul'>li~Wor \~ S,l,7119,1l20 - Community Sm;m5% S2112,110 ruhlk Sa(rr)'JN 515,08.I,JIO Grnml!\t-r\"i,n21% SR.m,lJO Othrr'lw. S2,m,81lO t;ENfRU FU~[l R[VENUES FISC.Al YEAR 100111001 T.I\I" S~% SZl,,186,'180 I Charges for !\t-rvi~r~ '101I 53570,740 YOUR CITY SERVICES SU5 POlICE '99S\\omOffims . ,12 Grnrral Emplo}rrs oVolun1rerProj:Iam\ Rrler.'C' Olfkrr~ Citiunra1rol Explolrl5.'ou1s . SolurionOrit'mrd PolicingUni1 PlOgram Orirnlrd Policing Tram Bicvdr Enforcrmrm Tram . Crim'r Prrvrlllion Unit .St:hooIRr~outctOmccn . DARE Program SIO.l0 ilK!: (S9.2Z nol fundrd u'llh Gmrr.J Fundi) . Dail)'Slaffing: 5 FirrEnginrs, I TruckCompan)" I Hral)" Rr'irur Unn . Total Emrrf(rn()'Rrspon\tSraff: 21 Cap1Jim, 21 Enginrrn, 11 Firrlijthlm Jlmpt'ltor\,JBmllionChirfs 16 Adminimatiw &- Mainlrnamr SuIT . Emrlgrn~y Rrlpon~ Ratr: ~JO!a\\ilhin5minulr~ SI..!'J CO~IMU~lrY sntvrcr\ '258.~aw'lufde\'rloprdpalklalld '12parh(216.11.lC!rsl . 2 ,[It'dal ulr fa,-jlilin: CUt:alllung.l/Dt'mrnl Cltek Trail Rnt and R.lnt:ho Cu~al11onga F.pi~rnlrt Stadiul11/Spom Compb (1I,58~ 'talsladium,Jlijthrrdw/rballfidds, llighlrdba".,ballfidd,2Jighlrd~onrr fiddl,2rolltrhotkr~' rinh,luppon fadlilif\-~I,banrs) . 9j aITrs of parkland OJrrtll1l~' undrr (00' muoion. Coml'lr1illn-ll'intrl 200112002. '2communi1\'crnler~:liom East Coml11unit\,'Crmrt(ll,J84s.f.)Jnd !.ionl \libt COll1~unir\' Cemrl 00.000 d.1 '1 Ifnior ,rmrr: Ran<hoCu(.lll1,mg.l !\t-nilJr Crnler (JO,g~O d.) . I 'l'uIU (t11ler: R.C. Family Spom Crnrrr (NOII':lhtTl'rnCr11ltrillowrdimidrof lhl' R.C. Famil~' SJ'H'lfI Crntrr.) (ROOD ~.f.) SLlO AUM1~I"ilRAl[()r--< . [';lr'i bills,m~Ool!:tl II'cordl,a[[()unring, insurantr,\'lIIrrlrlrrlillns SILlS A~IM:\I.CO~lR01 . Colleos 'itra)" animaI~"hrhrf'j thrm J.i,rnsl'\& Pmnih9% Sl1l02.J20 Imrr~o\rmmrmalI7"11 51,1711,g50 u~ of Mnnl'Y & Prol'm)' J% Finl'l& Forf,'irs 1% 51.072.720 S~8tl180 SUI! COMMU~lrY UnlIOJ',\IF.NT . Indudl'~ Pl.lnning, Building ami Safl'IY, and Engineering. Major proklls la~1 ~'ur include: . ~lai"r upd'ITI' l<l lhr Cily'sGnrrral I~Jn, indlldingdrtaill'dnct'd~aw:"nlt'ntflJt 1\llicr,Firr,Lihrar.',l1ldConmrunir\,s..'rvi,(\, . Implrmrmrd a r~mpull'rizrd pl'm;it u,llkinjtlYltem. . P~(ifi{ Elwrir Inland [mpi~ Trail: Atlrd allhrlradagl'nr"',inr()IJ~la!ioll\\'ith5.tn &rnardmoA\\ll{iat('d GlI\'C'rnrnentl and fi\rolh\'r d1ir~, roprrpall' a MaSIn Plan for1hr (lln\'l'r~ion of a formrr r.lil (orridur imoamuhi'purposrlrgionaltrai1. 'SU('I'~lfulJ\'annrHdo\rr500amlofland . Thr Arbor~: Malin Plan for lhl' dl'\'doprnrntllr ,IOOacrrlofmixrdul\', . Appro\alandnlO\lfunionofl.lI\1r',homr il11l'rlJ\'fmrm(1'1l11'!. . RouteIl6:ViluallmpfOl'rml'ntl'lanpnwid, inj(a unique itll'nrilY' for Fou1hill lIuull'\'dfd, . Fi!\t Timr lIom{huyrl Program: HLoJlll\innNol'emht'r 1'I'll! S5,.\911,12 in Mnrljtagr LOJllSa~(lfIl/I/OI S54URII in Aj(rm)' A\\hlanle .1\ of 11I1/01 SI.22 l'lJlUIClJlIRARY (n"lIimdrd 1i'liI, Gmcr,11 rum/.) . 1~2,1fl5 bo.~)h. I'ideos, 1M)... CD ROM... tll. . Open 7 day\ prr.....erk . 8 (hildrro's ~h,t)'!imr'i, lotlrllrr, plr...hllol and ...h'Mll al:l', ~ days fJrh \lrrk. ''111nlllledal,lhd\rSMII'S\ihlr2~htl\jf'j . Kidlmooilrl'illrinjtnrighl,urh(MHlwhIK,ls and parh .....ilh S,0110 b.K,k~ fm kidl, . Trlhnoluj(\ CeOlel \lirh II PC's. . Rudinj(Tut(lring for Younj(ltr!"; 710 Il . Rdfrrn'fJbu~ints'i infurmalion sl'rvke~ . Aduh and Family litrlJI-Y proi:tam\ . Trl'hnoloj(\' Cl.i,~\f()f.llla~(\ Sto~ MAIr--<lE",^~C1)I'LJIIl IC \l;'OR!I:\ '-l.Jinrain\: . ~f\Omilrl ofroad.....,l). 'R5mibuf'lUrmdtain 'll,OOOrt!:ulat()ry,lfam{~i!:m . 70,000 rrrr, 'J7.Sa(ulllr2Jmibof{qurmianrrail, . .12 mib of ['ve fendni: fOllhe lrail \)'~lr111. . 51J \'fhidr~ (111/1rxN 1(d./lTI,pl,hp~ 12 },,<n''I trM,L,/.(<n'Jwn,tnt,ll<mlifMlfmrrtI.7J/WII<jMIr- mmluilllll,-hi/Jrlluon"'O'/m"l,aJph.11JroIIm.10 l,adrn,15/prrmofmrJilr<jlllpmmllll,-h4.lPIIJ. mmml.ttWrs,(}.JinJ<r.t>J) 'U\lJfthallfidds . 2J I"Llk pIJ~g",und" 18 park rf't/Ooms . 10 Lill' f.lcihlin (Crf'I,Cmtrr, SI<ldlll"', Am",,J SiIr//t7: Lie',rs f~'I, Lill~' It'NI, l.ibw'/. ,'imillr u.s1t1,Film,/YSpmt,rflllrr,r.olf""illt\j,d, Mt[",bnkSlall,m) 'F.ldlilirS.lndm.linlenanrrltaffmaimains 91l~ d()()n. J'I~ plumbing Ii~rurr\, 1~ I p;irk and paseobrn,hrs, OVtI ZOOfilr flIingubhm,1l7,~85~.f.offl(lorlilf,and appTllximJldy55.000ligh1 fixturrs 'lhrTrailsalldAppliuli(JIl'iC1\'wprol'irlrs \lrrdrnnrrol,frniliulion,fungkidl'.hl'rbi. (id\' applita!ion~ to 15~ ,1(rl'~ oflurf d'Y.....idc - - - 1-210 (ROUfE 30) UPDATE-- 11 BRIlX;,"~ DOWN, 2 TO Go I\rin~ sern'd by d new frcrwa~' is a boon to any com- munity. but RJllCho is a major residrnl Jlong Ihis n('\lest southt'fn California east-IIest routl'. Sapphirr. Carnelian, Anhih,tld. [)a\' CTrek, HeUman, ~til1iken, RocheSltr, EtiwJnda, EaSI. Hermosa and l!Jwn-dt'\'cn of RJl1[ho CUfall\onga's IJ bridges for the nrw 1-210 Fretw'l}' hJI'l' bt'en {omplt,ted. The two Tl."maining, at !kryl and Amethyst, shuuld ht, complel!,' St'ptrmlll'T 2002. just in time for the frrt"way opening at the end oflhal YC,lf. Tht' 1-]5/210 inrl'fl'hJngl'opens late this SUllIllIt'f. TIle 1-210 was unfunded until \'Olm in San Bernardino County p;lssed Mt'aslltt.I,J half (fill SJII'S tal for IUl1Sportatiol1 in 1989. The 182 miles 1-2]0 prke tag is $1. [ billinn and onn' ..umpletrd. the freeway \\-illlonnrCl Roule 66 in b Verne with ]-215 in San lkrnardino. P(lI'UL\R METIlOLlNK SER\1CE GETS A BIGGER STATIO:\' Triplr the parking and a longer p]atfurm lIillprovide for expansion of pup' ular Mctrolink Savicr al the Rancho Cucamonga station. Especially wrlrome new fealures indudr more parkin! for disabled per~om and four e!rnril \'chi.. e charging ~tJ. lions. The S2.~ million dollal prict tag is bring paid bl' Rancho pending rrimbursr- mrmfromfeJeralandslall'SOUnes. NEW SrollM DRAIN SUPPORTS EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL Eco:\'mllc BASE A new ~torm drain from Dl'l'r Cft't,k Ch'lIlnclanuChurrh Street south Jlongllermosa to Foothi1l is LOmplele. The IIrrmo\a ~torm drain (rom Chufl'h 10 iu~t north of Ba~eline is undt'fwJY. Together lhr~e t.....o ph.l~t.S will ruS1 SID.] million. drri\'ed from both the San lkrnardino Countv Flood Control Distrid and lhf Ranlho Cucamonga Rede\'e1opmenl Agenc}'. anu the projfrlwill Sllppor1 indu~lrialde\'elllpmcntwhichwillcrratemorellJ(a] i()h~. When funding hrromes avai]abk Pha\t' J from Ba~e1ine 10 thc/\hal.omaChannrlnorthoflllthStrrflwillbeginul'sign. RANCIIO GUARDS AGAI:\'ST ENERGY CRISIS TRAFFIC J\.\IS Don't look for Rancho on the latc night nrwswhrn rulling h]alkoulssnatltraffic.turningsignJledinlCfSerliominlofour way ~tops. The Rancho Ci~' Council has rtSponut'd 10 lhe energ~' (fhi~ b)" allowing S700,OOO 10 m'alr a ballc'T}" ba< k. upsys1emlhalwi1lkrrplhrlighlsworking,lIldurivm safr. Thrinstallalionrequirfdnolon]yabauerys)'Stemhul also the convmion ofsignal]amps 10 the I.EDtyprof lamp. As well as Rancho's own 9~ signals. the Cil}' is also installingthes}"StrmsontheJOsjgna]sthe~tatl'ownswith. in lhr city. TRIED SmlE FUN O~ TIlE RUN YET? If ~O, maylx- ~'ou're one of tht fun~t'l'ker~ who tried out Ramho's nt'W rnubile reat'Jliull l'Unn'pIIJ\1 spring or summrr. "The idea brhind Fun on the Run is to bring reae,llioll 1l! .....hm' the II('0pll' are. imlead of the mher \lay around:' commented I'au]a PaduJn, Communit}' St'rvkes ~pokt'sp('rwn. "We rnhamed the r{'SOUf,es of Ranlho's parks by hrinl!:inga rmt',llion s1JIT pwun with JlI ]8' trail. er full of gamt's, mf,s, dnd fun to aTrd parks. A.s wdl as having d grl'alliml'. kith PMlid/l<ltt.t! in facili. Tated ,lttivifirs that art' posilh'l' and build ~df nl('('m," exp ,[inl,d P,ldlllt1. """"'- During tltr school ~l'Jr ,hl' program ran from 2:30 p.m. 10 S p.m. ;ll ~~. Bear Gukh, ~liJlikt'n, !lemMJ, Old lllwn. Jnd Windrows p;lrh. , Summer t'xh:ndl'd Ibo\(' huur~ tu nwroin!: ,md aftt'rllllun \llifh al 10 srp' . aratl' locations induding !.ions. Mour1l.lin Vil'w. Ik'rvl. Gohkn Oak, .,:'".. Vkloria GrO\'l's. &:ar Gukh, lit-rows;!, Old li)wn, and '\x'illlJruW\ parks. U Til find uUI whl'n FUll 1I11 thl' Run.....ill IUltlt. ttlyuur park. Ing nn to , ~ www.ci.ran(ho-ru(;JnJOn!:a.(a.usur(;IIl~n27ljtl. RANCHO LI~\DS 1:-\ E-SEllVICES An a~tullishing 85% (If Ramho humr\ ha\'t wmpUlrr\ .....ith intl'l1WI autss. \\1lrn RandlU di\1.II~'rH'd il.....a,shvnwtoonlinl'rt.!:ularsinJanu,u},20Q(),lhr City was aln';ldy un ibwaYl0hJvingullt'uf!:uv. rrnmt'nt's bt'st web sill'S, In fat1. intNnational m<lpping wflwMl' gi,1Il1 [SRI. b,lwd in Rrlllal1ds. ga\'l' Rancho a lhird pbtr worldwidt, for bt:st USt' of Us M,lP Objt'c1\ suflw;Ht' fur m~idt'r.u1iIHl.(ul1I. "Imidl'randlO.wm 'thinks' jusllikr sunll'ont. sfaTthing fur an illdu~trial nr rl'tail bu~il1t.ss lu(aliull: expl.linl'd Projw Managl'r Kalhy Wahlmom. ~[)o YOU want to buy land. a building fur Irase, maybl' a huilding for sale? Yilll can starth thaI way.lle)w hi~~ 11J.ll's anolhn ....a)' lU st'arth.Dors illlt'cd 10 lit. t!o'ir 10 a frrellay. have rail sfrvke: C!ilk un thl' map. 1.lIom in or out. 'lake a lonk .11 who {Jwm it alld wholo (()ntatl.~ Thl' lIt'bsill' usn a st.arthahlf dat,lhasf wuplt.d with Geugr.lphiIJllnfilrnl;llilln Systrm ((;ISj mallS ofloGllions that arl' linkrd lOgt'lhl'r. ~'lhl'wt.bsilt.haslt't!loa stron~parrnl'rshir II-ith lht'arl'J'srl'JI t'SWlt. wmmuniw." nmlinued Wahhlrum. "h's in lhl'ir intereSTs 10 leT U~ know whals a\'ail;lblt' so we Ian ,uti- \;lll' tlu'prnpenyon lhl'wl'hsitt'. \X'e'vral\omadl' il llluvenit'ntfor thl'm1Udothal onliue: Conn'niemt' is the goal hi'hind ~evrral of Ramho's (il}' wt'bsiTC ft'.1lUrrs;l\ wrII. 'IOtlay you tan luok up t'lItmainmt.nl and rt.tTfalion optiun\. downluad rl'gi\trJlinn furm~ fur dassl's and sp<.ms. find UUI ahuut juh oppurtunilin. ,lI1d aL'lns building permit and businl'ss IiIt'nM' applifaliuns onlil1l'. And it's R.1ntho's 1:0,11 to allow }'ou to me them and P,IY online in lhl' lint Yl'ar ur two, 'lhl' s,lml' ~Ot.s fur lihwy (ards. rwl'aliun a(ljvitin and 16 otht'r forms and app!itatinns from joh app[irations to filming pt'fmilS ;lnd grading u'rrilkalillns. lht' websilt' has alllhl' slJnd.lrd cit~' informatillll lilll. Iikr 11ll'l'ling sthedult-s. agendas. ,md minUles. lists uf cilY dt'p,trtmt'nlS. and J wmmunity L'alendM. 'Ihr Iibw}''s ....Thsi!t. is a H/7 \'irtual1ihrarl' of 12 miljur Ibl,lhasl's induding husil1l'sS infortlwiun. hioguphies. and sud,ll issul's featuring Ihe ful lexl uf m;l!:atint. and journal mides. Tht. lihraf')' ,llsu u/Jl'l'\ It'lhnolog\'ILlS\l's 10 prmnutewmpu1t'rlitt'f;lI}' and Ihl'rr arr ~O fret. puhlic a((es\ tt'rmin.lb .1, wdl ,IS 0 penlium lluwl'red inlernl'lartess worhlatio!lS;lvailahleal $J pt'r hour. Rallthukids onlinl' is a fun to111pt.m'nl lifdlt' lily's ....t.bsitl. wherl' city staff treated wntt.nllhill indudt'S gall1t'S. fun falls alloul Ranlho. kids' bel informalion aboul1M'" ,1 dlv like Rantho works. and a hi,Wtit" timdint' frum tht'limt. o(t';Lrly Klliv!" ,\mnil'Jlh lhruugh 10 Rantho's imorpuratiun 23 ~l'ars agu. Vbil Rallthu\ sitt'S <II \\'W\\,d.f;lmlllHUGlmtl1l~a,la.II'. Ranthukids llnlil1l' is undt'r thl' ~intl'radivt' lity Silt'SM bunon. Buth insidt'rantho.tllll1 ;lIld lhl' 1ihr.Jr~ (www.npl.hh.cJ.us) tJll Jhooc J{{!'Sst'd din'lll\. Wll.ll do!"s lht. fUllJrt:lwld fur t',st'rvin's in Ralltho~ SUl11fliml'in lhl' next \"CarllT Iwo.residt'nl\....Jntin~ tuhuild;l \(1I111l addilitm and dfwluper~ nmslruning a hllusillg Irad may hulh hI' ahlt. to di,d up Ihrir pl'Tmil aPI,!ita!iun unlin~ and ITJlk il lhruu~h thl' approval sptt'm. lht. firs! Slt.p W.I~ wmpklt'd 1,1Sl ~l'ar whl'n lluildillj.: and Saft'IY \It'lll livl' wilh a ne\l pt'rmll lratkltlj: ~~\t{'111 cll1l'd lidl'll1.llk in NowmIIt'T.ful1ll\lrdhylllanninj:inmidh'bruaryandf.ngim'ninginJUIl{'. The rnuhs: "We slarted in mid.Nuvemher brtausl' Ihill'S u~uall\' a ~I(j\l lime fur us. hUI lasl Novl'mlwr and Dl'(('1l1bt.'t \lenl Hal\" and \Ie isslIt.d un'r IljOO pt'mlils ~hl'n \If nUfm.ll1y pnll't'\s ahuu! ~OO: wml1lt'nwd projrtl manager Bill MakshonolT. Nut ~l'ar. look for ulhl't r-setvin's from Ramho CUl'amonga. RAl'iCIIO RI~\[)s-- LIBRARY'S LITERACY PROGRA~IS RECIPE 1'011 SrCCESS 11\ !1t'\TI Inll bll'~llr lUll ~nlln. fur lhal IIlJlIft-lo lrMn or improve' f!;;u!ing and ',HitinF "kilk Thrn' IilfraCf progrAm\ run hy lhl" RJl1lhn CUGlmonga I'uhlill.ihw) hdp wnuld-hl' rt'Jdm. from Illddlwlu,ldulh.rnNerlhc\killlhalwi1loprnuptht'worldof It'arnillgl<>ftlll'l11. ~Tht'Tt. ar... J (!IUrlt. nf imllllTIJn1lhing\ to remember ;lhclllllita. dtf First (If ;111. not hring ;lhlr lo r('.td (an IX' J (~..dr in J Llmily." npLlinnll.ihw) Oirc.lnr Dt'!lIIlJh Clark. "A pm'nl who dur,n', [l'''U ncver in1rn.!lIIt'\ hi, or hn dtHd toOtwh dnd lhnt' are no hnllh in the home. nIl' lhild prohahly uut-,n'[ grl J lihw} Gird, uo{'\n'tgoln,lory tinw. and j,ht,.hind wht'n hem ,he ,larb SthlK1L nUl (.Ill kad 10 Ill\\' 'l'Ife'lt'!'m Jnd frustration. So now the (hild J\'oid, 11';lding ;lnd tilt' I'yde pt"fprlIlJtr~ itwlf. Tht. Ramho CU(,lmlln~J [luhlit' l.ihrilH' \llUl1\UrS a Jilt'raty pro~rJm for adull, and JI\u offers thosl' ;lduh Ir.lrlll'rs du.' opportunity to partidp;Jtl' in bmilil's fur l.iter,lf)." Aduh litt.wy i\ vuluJltnr hased ....ht.re a trained tlltufwOrk\....ithtlwh,<Irnt'rt....unightsawl.(.kfnrt....ohuurs.Familin for Litl'fJl~' offers Illunthlv \luntimes and craft acli\'itil'-s to thildrt'n who afl' hH' ~T;l[S old nr und~'r. Familin are a[so ahle to grl fn'c lhildrrn\h(~>handp.lTt.nhafl';\hlrlnlakrll.lfenting....urhh(fps. l.ilt"fJl)'programmingdonn't qup....ithJiveYfMolds.hol\nrr. the lihwy .1Isu supports tht'."hl)ol 'y\tl'm.with re,uling tutorin.g. C:hildrt'n Ill't....wn 7 ;ll1d 12 arerhglhlt.lo pM1mpalt'1ll Balk luBaslls. BJlk 10 B;l\it\ hq:.1l1 wilh ;1 Lihrar\' SI'niitrs and TrthnuJogy progr.lI11 granl. \'(1(' h.ts'l' four 1\'lIrht.uiun\ t~al have sprda[ sof""arr fur improving rt'ading;llld JJ1alll skills as 1\t'llas I'oluntn'rs who tutor rradint:. 'lhl' idt';J is tn hdp dlildren ;lllain thl'ir gr.lIll' Il'vel for rt'Jding.~ dntfillt'd Clark. 'Ihe program is popular with tt'alht'n and prup<lHl \101\ art' l\'1J;11l~' fil1t.d ....dJ In ;ldl',Jllttofe;lIhnt.....ws\iul1. OIT CLERK OPE1'iS PASSPORT OFFICE If forrign It.lvel is parI of your plans. you'll Ill'td a valid pas~f~)rl. \'(1;11 used 10 be J minimum of IWO errands, ont to gtt photos followrd by a llrk to tilt' rt'gional passport officI' is now a handy singlr SlOp al tht Ran,hu CU(;lmonga Cit}' (Ierk's Ollitf. Srrvilt' IH-gim Sep'ember.J.2001. 110m: Monda)'-Thursday, 1/ a.m. to J p.m. or by i.ppninlmrnr (909) 4n2700 C,ml:PhOIOS:$J2.Passpor1Agt'ncy:S4S,ProcessingFff:S1S AVAIlABLE Au. WEEK L01'iG: A NEW BEST FIUE1'iD TUl){UlefOT\\ords,lhat'sIhr.....ayshrhtrSlaffdtsHihflhl.dnpilt1d( illslhalJrt' ius! .....ailing for a new hornr with you. The Rancho CUIJllwnga Animal Shther lorated at ]1780 Arrow Roote next 10 lht Epirtl11Cf is open \'('eekd,l\'s II a.m,tu 6 p.m. and 7 p.m. on Wrdnrsdays and ]1 a.m. 105 p.m. Salurda".lt1JSunday. FRml R\Il5 TO TRAIL~ Once the route ofSOU1bern Califurnia's fanlOus n'd GIl'S, tbe Pacitle Electric Inland Empire Trail will rt'surrrdtbe former rail line to ,I new form of intercity Traffic-walking. run. ning, bk...ding. or borseba(k riding. Working together, The ciTin of Claremont, Momdair, Upland. Rancho Cueamonga. Fomana and Riaho bave mJ~ter plannrd a 21.mile wrridor along the fonnrt rail line who~e rigbt of way was migned to tbe San Bernafllino Associated Go...ernmems in 19l11. TogeThrr, under a Joim POWt'fS Agreement, the SJme entities are work. ingtoraisetbegrantmoniestobuildil. At ~5 fret wide, the corridor ('an arcommodate fumre transit USt'!i in addition to a planned 11.foot";demulripurpo~hJrdsurfaee\l;thl"ft'ofoot\\idecrushrdgrmlshouIdt'fS on each side. \'Iihm pmengm enjoyed the open air and grtlm and \1tleyards of the Inland Empire as they traveled fwm SalllaMonica as fJf as Rrdlands, fulure rrail UsefS will enjoy wn\'en ient,UH'SSto puhlir facilitit'!i and in somt cases ewn shopping as the\'exptore thl" trail and its history. Want to pmicipatr1 Call Principal Planner Dan tolrmJn at (ll09) 477-2750. FOOTIIILI. Focusr~~ 01'i FmlJRE, E~IIlRACES PAST Amt'tica's first transwntinental highway, Route bb was wnstruw,d in ]926 and linked communities as di\'elSe as Chicago and Santa Monica, \XlnollJ Jnd Oklahuma Cit.... Ranrho's 6 miles of Routr bb. Foothill Buu]evard, is the heart of the citv still, pr~ucing $557 million a war in Taxable salrs or 72% of RandlU's total ret,lil sa(l.'s. The FOOThill rom Group was formed last yw by city staff, the Chambt't of Commerce, and kH:al businesses to examine bull' tv reinfutrr Foothill's idl'ntit\, as ash~ppingdeslinationwhilrimprovingtht retJil l.'n\'ironment and ae\lheti[solthr corrtdor. Over the lasT eigbt months the focus ~roup and Urban n('Si~n Studios have rome up with (On,ept~ 10 tie ~ome of the morl.' di\PiHJTl" dements of FOOlhilllOgt'tht'r anJ give it a ~tronger ~ense of place throuJ;:h a unified and unique \trrt'tscapr. ']he con. cepts include elemrnts which forus on Foothill~ Rontl.' IIh heritagl.', thl.' farlor that makes Foothill truly unique. Rancho wil1likdy undertake some of tbe milepo\t features at the ri~ht major intersections and otht'r JSpt'cls oftbe nt'w \trt't'tsrapt' \\'iIlheimpleml.'ntl.'dasapattofde\'e1opingne\\'pmkmalongtlwcorridur. FYI I Co,reo to Move Choosing to 5tay in Rancho whtn it rxpands, Cosl(O will mo\'r from itsrurrem 10c;l.Iion al Foolhilland thrl.15 to Fourth and thrl.15. The storr will rxpandlo lSO,OOOsquartft'tland hopt's to caplUre a larger shart' oftbe r egion- .11 markrt \\iilh ils inCl'rasrd frrewa}' rxpusurr and proximit), to Ontario "-!ills, History of Aha Lorna 10 be Re.issued The original author of Iht' History of Aha Loma has Turned Tbt' copyrighT for The publica lion om 10 the City of Rancho Cucamon~a whi.h will he re.issuing Ihe publication later this yrat. Thr 100+ pJge book .....ilI be reprinted in an 8 x 10" formaT and will be for ~ale fOl $35 at City Hall. Procccds willbl.'nefltthrLibraryScholarsbip Foundation. l.oI.IC[ C~II\ for Strvlrr '18.5.'>8 r~rI I Ctlmr\ Repon~d J.5,lli ['JrllI CrimnRqlOnrd b,7.Ii Rrporhl'lkrn ]U'l~ Traffir Collililln\ Rrporll'd 1.8U Puntle WORK~ Enwrgt'nlV Call OU1S 'Slfrrll(llAfhrll 120 . F.lcililirl (r~lll) 380 Equipmmlm.timrfl.1Ilfr\lullhfl) 1.170 Slll'.1 Swrrr.ing (rurb milfl) 11239 fhitJM{'4,'s.6flfbu_.,JJojdtlmJ Strm~TM.1intm..uu(..u/fIm) 1.050 Graftiu Rrmol.d('itllflmj 3&00 Jl,510ljmmltfiJ l'roo.''ljl'i~t.~~t.RJjl1(:-trlfhn.) R~in D.~fil ClrJn-Up (1'~ldl) s..ho.dCros.\II:i1k.1I 1.~f1~h (lolimr-d (1.1,) Vid.olmp<'rurm ofSlnrmDrain\l1in.arfr~t) Sigll\Rt'pJlrrd Signshl\IJIlt'(1 TrJffi'lrgt'ndlf,Jilltl'd(d.) SlOlll\ Dr~im r ~~nrd "",hN-,mJ,I7,'s(Kl1ldt.wJ StnrmlJr.linlll\\pt'urd id~j,I>.uI~' 7li6 Sidl'w~lk Rrp~lfI'd h.f.) ]2,7&2 Curh Rrp,urrd (\.f.) 1.'118 Drill"\\J\' Arrmadll'\ Rrp.lil'l'd (Ul 2,m \'('hrrlrhair TamI'l (s.f.) 2~8 Pothulrlrrp,mrd fl,1Mh/j 1.'lJ2 A\phahRamping 580 A\ph,llt U\'t'r!JH (d.) 1O,~87 '-\'qm...hrf'!l1o....d\aOOfl1Mifl(d) 3J.9Q8 ct.W1)A\phalt rrpair\(I.f.l 17,];2 Wind dr~rh d.~nrd up ~8 Inad\ Park;llft';lg.mmud >~,O(l() Trrrlprullt'd 5,~M Slumplrrmo\'.d U3 lrm pl~J1lrd '1.14 n.rl Rrp,lIf\ . Srhrdulrd/Cnmpl.lrd . Ullllhrdul.dICompl.trd l'nm1l;lmffn1n~Iinlt.'!I.ullf'l'f\it:'i l1.rlr.rufiranonimpeou>ns Saf.tj.in\[It'(tionlforfl.f1 GaU"n\lIffurldi\prn\.11 22.600 ]2,&00 3A~O J\5 12,m HZ m "" H QO 76A7] COMMUNIIY DrVf.UWMf.NT l'l~nning All Prrmil Applk,ll1Un, SilrPlanRrl'I.....\ COlldllinUdl U\.Pernlll\ SuNJi\'i\i"n\ In-Ilomr Ru\inr\s Pamih Trrr Rrmol',ll Prrmill Si~n [\-Imit\ fluilding&S~ffly![nginwing [\-Inm,I"ued 11,IIlRr\,ir....\ hllprltiun\ Fir\l Tim./I"m.buy.r Pmgum Lodn~ ~il](. Novrmber [4'18 ~5 S5.~91.132iu~lung.lg.1.oan\alofM/01 S5.w.J~6inAgrru:yA\'\hlarncd.'ofblII01 10.743 J.m 2H2~ m ~ ~]~ - ANIMAL CONTROl. Dop~h.hmd Cdlllhrhmd Orher \hdler~d Dop adoPlrdirclurn.d 10 olin., Cmadopt~dircturncdloo....ner Orhrradopledir.lurn.dtuo....ncl Arloptionralrfordog\ Adopnon ral. for C~l\ 2,U2 I.m " 1.IJ77 H9 . 5ll.1niO 25M, 80 " I.lURARY Li~rm'Vi\il\ 411.000 \t'\\'~,ks.,XIros.DV[}'.idrlrd 25,000 h.m\burrowed h80,027 R.gi\lmdBorrowm 115,000 Rrf.r.nr.Qu.lnunl 95.350 Slorytim.Villtor\ Il553 Technololil' Crnt.rViwors 10,000 Vlllull1rrr'Houn 8,032 Dorwionv'LibraTI'Foundarion $1>0,000 CMwnomlFnmcb ~ the Librdl)' S85,OOO ADMINISTRATIVE SER\'ICUi '" lIu,inc\\ I.ic.n\. Divilion BUlin.l\ L.iccm.\-Rrnrllall ;,~7J flU\m.11 Lit.nll'-Nrll Apphcall1\ 1.155 Fin~m.Divilion A((OUnl\ Pa\a~I.Ch.rh PmollChc;h C~lh Rrttipl\-Citl' 1I~1I Ca\h Rrrripl\-Of(Sil~ P.rwnnrl Divi\ion ."pplir~nofl\Rmil'rd I.~IO Rwuilm.nt\ 105 Orallntrr\.irlll '10 NumbrrofApplicdnt\lntm.i......d 713 N.w 1I1'.I-Full-Time 2'1 N.....llir.l- ParT.Timr [&2 l'Imh~\ingDivilion PUflhdll' Ordm lllUrd Rrqurm for Proro\.ll\ (non.l'ublll\\'m I) 14,687 7,St.5 1t766 53.no ~.ooO "" III " JII 311,J J' 11 FIRE !kl(lJU OthrrEm.rgrncy FirM AUlnlMulII.JAid TOTAL O\TRAIJ. CAll STAn.."CS Em.rg.ncy M.dir~1 Srrvic.si9,l3'1t Firr4.b4~ TOTAl. CU15. 8,751 COMMUNIlY SERVICES Sprci~1 hcnh P~rticip,uion ~lh of Jul)' 4.Soo Mo~i.~ in the l'~rk 2,500 CooctrbinthrP,lrkNighlof~tlf,il: 2,000 Park Opel1in~1 1.000 Foundt'J'~ I)~v P.lf".wr/C.Irbr.UXKl 11.000 Tn~LJgbbllg'&llolidayCraftFair 3,000 GUJsliCrlrbr,llinll 2,000 l\id\F.sl 3,S00 CinrllD. Ma\o bOO H.lf\nlTl,~'..Ly\FJl11lmM,uX{,[ 7,000 TOTAL 44,'100 Volunl.~f\: lkp~rtmrmdl Volunl.m HuursnfSC'n-'ic. Dullar Value Trip\&Tolln: D~)" TnI'I Mulri-DJ}.Trips TOldl Panicipaml TOl~1 Rf\l'IlU~ ConlrdclCluln: Clams Offrrrd (300 prf quarrrr) 1.200 particip.1l11\ 9.70~ J\:nn.R.sidrnl P~rTidpanll 1,5]9 TOlal R.\'rnu~ $.168,178 Partn.rshipl; IkparrmrnlJ1Pmnrr\hipl !)ollarValu. EpiHnlrr: R.nlall O,l\'~ of Rrnldl Ani\.ill' Da;, of QUdhl Ba\.ball P.rformin~Am: Clm.s('I) \l:'llfhhupI(~) TOTAL 1.025 17,m S23'l.708 12 [011 OJ' $58,000 .106 Sb.15,'J'I7 P~nicip~lilln J[[ 72 J8J 7 Srniou: P~f1i,jp~tion Sprdal h.nl\13~l 5.100 LUlllh lim. ~Irdl PfIlgram H.517 (22,9/icmwr8J1l)(2I,6(l')"(",,(",,~"') Clas\.s, Worhhops, Srminm 911,965 Srnior Trausportalion Proj;ram 7,]10 TOTAL li5,&92 T.rnl: TernCent.r- AftrrSdJ(KlIlFridJyr\ipnnn'P"ill 9,lIOO Spedal EWnll (5) ~97 \l'orhbl>r\l~) 150 Collrgrf;nr 2.1>00 CurrrFair liDO Tern l..arningCrmrr ,1.1 1rtllllnn~t1UJ^..-ti\m,am(lRAC) 1,3]5 TRIIC 1I,1~~'\iltill~ Prllgram 7811 Tr.nTrips/Cdmp . . 300 Sk.ltrPml\m.nsn-,1lJJfl,,,<Vt't)'Clinic\ I~ .Lhj~1hr;'!~" CdIt/j'II)(J) ~,~OO R~d Ri~bl>n \\:'r.k Prrl.nl~lion (l4,w.Joj}{"i'f) TOTAL YOUlb: Summ.r Da~' CampI ~Io~il~ Rruunon (5y,,~.k\) (Fr~rrrttkf\Jm) Specialhrnll P1~r\('hl~)1 Pla~'l(h'H)1 GradUJlion Pla;'Camp ('II"'''IfflI''''~'~1.IOil'''l'd''') lorAI. P~rti(ip~tiun I.~OO 22,075 rmicip~lil>n 3250 955 J.'i(l 28,142 100 100 .IU97 " '" 72 Spm1\: P~rlirip~li"n Yomh Spoml'tlJgr~11l1 !J'ftrrl'~."",wjrAJ1.MJurlrd, _"'lI<lhrofhh~h_)/fJ,.u,.fi'lljltllN4. )lr>MlJ,Iv..JduJ..,.'1frf,M.fi.Ui 302,577 i\duhSpl)m~ro~rams (l(J((tr.w!Ij"UlfL<<ft"I/NllIm~lI) 214,MMh YGuthSporh'Prngraml (htlHI1tJif1i11ldJ<<((T) q70,124 RC Famih' Sport Cemrr (Oprrrrtr,:/o.lJtI~.J1.mJ'''''fI/(tb.,J) .10,Ofl{J Aqwtit~t..amtos....imProgr;lm 7S.J12 TOTAL ],595,qO~ lIum~n S.rviu\; P~ni{ip~liun rnrorl1l~liondndRrfm,11 2,000 no ShorClinir lIOO !.wurrSrri~~j'rhhnl1\ 1.718 CummodilY 1>'\lfi~Ul1nn 5.737 IOTA!. ]0,26.'i STAn.."c'i 8Y TYPE OF FIRE FirrlExplo~ion.m Mobil.Sll1Ktur.! ---- Proprrly.741l1l 5.183 2,669 ~O& 19J 8,751 R.fus. 18.47'11 V~grwion 181JIlIl AUlnlMunul AidH3011 TOTAt rlRtS' 406 1.0\'1 STAnmcs TOTAl. 52,682.289 V.hidf 27.831/t [MFJH;t:NCY M UllCAI. Sf R\'ICf.S CAtL COMI'ARI.ms Balk lif~ SllppOfl 27.511'fa Orh.r2.N Ad~'an<rtl lif.SupJlUf1\ 701~~ _ RANCHO MAKF_S Tol' TEN SAFEST CAlJFOR:\lA Cmf"S One the oflen safest clties in the sIJIt' and amongthc lop 25 cities om 100,000 nationwide, Ranlho meets its ~oJh for puhlic ~Jfl"Y for OOlh police and fire Sl'n'icl's. Crimt has drnppt.d an Jvcrage of 5% per yearovtr (he pas! five yeats and the I\llirl.' Depmmenl colllinues tu support sunrssful {Time redurlion pruj:tams sluh as Nt.jghhurhood \\?at[h Jlld child saft'r}' proW,lms in(!udi.n~ hkyde Sarl'!)', pmonal s;lft.ty. and fin!:t'rprintin~. E.ld, yl'af rnur~' than 350 \'olunteeN m Rancho s NClghhorholld Wakh groups coml' 1(~t'lht'r for ;1 h<Hhenlt spollsOIed Jultul)' with the Fill' Department as a !\;JlillJlal Night OUI ,dehtation. Ran,hu wnlinucs to rw:ivt an annual $.175,000 fedt'Tally fum!t'd COPS gIant lu support (Ot1IJl1U' nity.urifnrrd pnlicing dT(lrl~ induding nr..... p.llrol offiens. In 2000-200], Ramho ;uldt'd 5 ne..... p;llrnl prr~onrlfl !O il~ ro\ler. Snmfo'\{I'S IJ~\RN CONSEQlJE'imS OF DRUNK DllIVll"G En'ry]5 Minutt's i\ tht' Il;llllt'uf a progr,lnllhal i~ a grim hut dTntivf H'mindt'r of the d,lmage (Jused hy tlrunk drivers. Named afler thl" frt'qm'ru)' nf drunk driving fata1ilit'~ in thf U.S., E\"rrv 15 Minll1t'~ is hfld iU1nuall" at IIJH' uf Karllhn\ thrrehighs(hook ' The \l'nior dd\S pJrlicip,ltn in a ~imlll,lt('d fillill drunk driving a('cidt'n1. Student -"i('limN- aft' (arrit'd a.....ay hy ~tut[l'nh .....ho hrcoml" amhulant'r atlendanh fllr lIlt'day. nil" -drunk (Iri~'l'T" is arrestrd and hnokfd. -\X~1nn~r\" givr th('i'r aWHJl1h. "Families and frirnds~ arr informed ahollt rht' faralit), AhnutlO sTudents rak(' un rules for thr Mlivit\, and the rr~l ufthe ~rninr da~~ ....atches. Tht' pmidpants.Hr hllll~rd in an ,ma'hnrrl and ((lun~ded about .....hat for ~omr, i~ an up~elling rxpt'rit'n('('. Tht'la~r qrp is an assembly .....hrre thr p;H1iciparing Sllldent~ sprak 10 thr da~~matr~ ahoul lhrir rxprril:na', FIRE U-\SncR PIAN CWSE TO Cmll'UTE hIl'Uc\IENl~\'1l0:'\ Thr o(K'ning (If Ranchu CU(alllonga\ nr\\-' firf m.lintt'n;(J1(t' facility adjil\'t'nt to Firl' Station 174 nn Jrrsry brings Ranrho thn'r qllarrm of rhr way toward wmplrtion of its ~1.ls1t'r ['Ian dr~'e1oprd in lhr farl)' Ilj1;lO~. That pl,(J1 ralll'd for lhr acquisition of land fur thrrr f,\CHilin and th(' ton~truttiol1 of two ne.... firr stations, lhr maintfniln('(' facility, and Ihr rrlofatinl1l1f a r('mpuran' ~l.llion hou~t'd in mudular buildings on Ba"irlint'.' . A bond is\ue in the rarly J91;lO"iP,lid fotthrrdo{'alionandlhr Jml'~' parfrlthillhuusl'sbllthoor ofthrnrll sJarion~and thebrandnrll'firemaintenanrefacilit)", .Wl'ill'tjuirrda largl'ruuurhp.lr(rl10 accommodate bolh thr mlion and thr mainlenan(l' f;Kility. T1w "il;ltion has a Jraining dril ro....rr and, the maintrnancrfMility hasallthrrquipml'nt n('(rs"iJryfur U"itusllppurtllllru.....nfirrwr\,itrand IIherr it's a win.win ~ilualion. to ~l'rvilf fire t'quipnwnI fTUrn Jwighburing juri~didions: nphtillt'd Firr Chirf[)('nni~ Midl'lel. What's nrxt for R,l11dlU\ Firl' Dl'pattnll'nr: "\1:'1' are innrgotialiononthrproprrtyforaswinllinthrnoTth. ('ast st'tluf orthr (it\' nnll,M(onlinUt'd Midlad. "l1l1"ft' hashrtnmollrywllt:f1t'dtufundtht'\winnfTUma"ipt'. nal tax di~lrill sincr IlJl\Y, Today, rhm'\ ahout S2,I mil. [illntohllild and t,tjllipa slatinn lhal will hl' (omplrl(' in th('II'intrrof200UOOrlnaddition.lhrDl'p;rrllnt'ntha~ rt'r('nrly tompl(,tt'd a Slralt'!:ir Phm,]sp.lttofllll'llpd,ltt' of Illl' City\ Gt'l1l'f.III'LLn lutH'LIlly ulllkrway. , - T H E c T v o F 12 A N c Ii o c u c A M o N G A PRESS RELEASE CONTACT: Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, City Manager's Office PHONE: FAX: (909) 477-2700, Ext. 2008 (909) 477-2846 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 19, 2001 Rancho Cucamonga, California - The first edition of the Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report for fiscal year 2000-2001 has arrived! In order to provide wide access to the information in the Annual Report, the City has made the document available in a number of ways. First, the Annual Report is inserted in the Fall 2001, edition of The Grapevine, which was recently mailed to all residents. Second, the Annual Report has been posted to the City's website (www.ci.rancho_cucamonga.ca.us)forthosewithInternetaccess.In addition, the Annual Report is available at City Hall and at the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. As a part of the City's ongoing community information program, the City is pleased to present this first Annual Report-a look back at the last fiscal year and a look ahead at what is next. City staff has worked hard to provide useful and interesting information about the City. We hope that our comn'mnity will enjoy the Annual Report. To best serve our customers' interests with future editions-the City would like to get input on the current edition. Please contact Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II by E-Mail at kthomas@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us or via phone at (909) 477-2700, Extension, 2008. For Further Information - Should you have further questions or inquiries about the Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report please contact Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, at (909) 477-2700, Extension, 2008. ### Mayor William J, Alexander Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams Jack Lam, AICP City Manager Councilmember Paul Biane Council member Bob Dutton Council member Grace Curatolo 10500 Civic Center Drive' P. O. Box 807 . Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 . (909) 477-2700 . FAX (909) 477-2849 www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us ')';-9 .~ . . . Forms and Applications Page 1 of2 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2000-2001 Annual Report Please note that you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to read or print these files. (The Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded at no charge.) . RC 2000-2001 Annual Report We welcome your comments on the City's 2000-2001 Annual Report. Please email Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, City Manager's Office or call (909) 477- 2700 x 2008. http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/rcannual.htm 9118/01 CITY COUNCil PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 19.2001 ~ ProVantage - Used Car Sale - Epicenter Special Event Area - September 20-24, 2001. ~ Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Grape Harvest Festival - Epicenter Special Event Area - October 3-8, 2001. ~ Vons - Corporate/Celebrity Game- Epicenter Stadium - October 20, 2001. Respectfully submitted, p~~ tJr' Kevin McArdle Community Services Director u~ Joe O'Neil + City Engineer - 10- ,q/