Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002/03/20 - Agenda Packet
OI'TY OF AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. MARCH 20, 2002 Ac~encv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ............................... Member Grace Curatalo ......................... Member Bob Dutton .............................. Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander ., Biane __., Curatalo__., Dutton , and Williams__ B.~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation on Measure I by Darren Kettle, Director of 1 Intergovernmental/Legislative Affairs, San Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). 2. Presentation of a Plaque to SBC Pacific Bell for their generous donation to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of Red Cross Month. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D..~. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: March 6, 2002 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/27/02 and 3/6/02, and Payroll 3 ending 2/24/02 for the total amount of $2,142,794,20. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 22 28, 2002. 4. Approval to authorize the advedising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 28 Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvements, funded from Account No. 1120305-5650/1116-120-0. City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 2 RESOLUTION NO. 02-073 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COYOTE CANYON LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval of Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records 33 pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 02-074 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES 6. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience and Necessity, DRC2002-00128 - COSTCO WHOLESALE, for the 37 issuance of a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage License for Off Premises Liquor Sales, at a proposed Costco Wholesale in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at 11800 4th Street (on the north side of 4th Street adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway) APN: 229-263-69. RESOLUTION NO. 02-075 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 21 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR OFF PREMISE LIQUOR SALES AT A PROPOSED COSTCO WHOLESALE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12) LOCATED AT 11800 4TM STREET (ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TM STREET ADJACENT TO THE 1-15) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 229-263-69 7. Approval of an application for California Beverage Container Recycling 44 and Litter Reduction Annual Payment by the California Department of Conservation Division of Recycling. City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02-076 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING 8. Approval for design of the Rochester Avenue Landscaping at Route 30 Project and appropriate $24,332.00 ($22,120.00 plus 10% contingency) 47 from Account No. 1103165650/1330110 (Beautification Fund). 9. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate Excess Street Right-of-Way 50 at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street, V-183 -APN: 209-041-47 RESOLUTION NO. 02-077 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE KNUCKLE INTERSECTION OF MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET 10. Approval to amend Professional Services Agreement CO 01-099 with 55 Geographics and approve a budget appropriation of $15,000 to the Non-departmental General Overhead City Account #1001001-5300 for professional services for the Rancho Cucamonga Reporter quarterly insert in The Grapevine. 11. Approval of Map and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 5'/ 15666, located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 02-078 6:3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15666 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT 12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 64 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 14494-1, located on the north side of Banyan Street between the SCE Corridor and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by US Homes Corporation. City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 4 RESOLUTION NO. 02-079 67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14494-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-080 68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14494-1 13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and '/5 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 14497, located on the west side of Bluegrass Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 02-081 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14497, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-082 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14497 14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 86 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 14498, located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 02-083 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14498, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 5 RESOLUTION NO. 02-084 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14498 15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 97 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 14523, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by MBK Homes LTD. RESOLUTION NO. 02-085 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14523, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-086 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14523 16. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 108 and 7 for Tract Map 14523-1, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC RESOLUTION NO. 02-087 111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14523-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-088 112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14523-1 City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 6 17. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 119 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 15838, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC and Standard Pacific Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 02-089 122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15838, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-090 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15838 18. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 130 Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 15902, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 02-091 133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15902, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-092 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15902 19. Approval to award and execute the Landscape and Irrigation 141 Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMD) No. 9 and No. 10 to Truegreen Landcare, Branch 6169, of Ontario, California (CO 02-018) in the amount of $9,399.07, to be funded from Account Nos. 1139303-5300 (LMD 9) and 1140303-5300 (LMD 10). City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 7 20. Approval cfa Street Frontage Reimbursement Agreement (CO 02-019) 144 for Construction of Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) from Bluegrass Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue (approximately 2645 feet) in connection with development of Tract 13812, submitted by Panda Development, SRA-26. RESOLUTION NO. 02-093 14'/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-26) EXECUTED ON MARCH 20, 2002, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF BANYAN STREET (FORMERLY SUMMIT AVENUE) FROM BLUEGRASS AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE 21. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates (CO 02-020) for the design of Traffic Signal Interconnect 148 System and to provide traffic signal coordination plans on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue in the amount of $112,000 and authorization of 10% contingency, to be funded from Account No. 112430356501248124. 22. Approval to accept Improvement, release the Faithful Performance 151 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 99-55, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga II, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 02-094 153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-55 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 23. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for 154 Improvements for DR 00-76, submitted by Khosro Khaloghli, located on the north side of Sixth Street, west of Cleveland. RESOLUTION NO. 02-095 156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-76 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 8 24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance '157 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 15350, submitted by General Dynamics Properties, Inc., on the southwest corner of Milliken Ave. and Sixth St. RESOLUTION NO. 02-096 '159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15350 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 25. Approval of release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tracts 15727- '160 1, -2, -3, -4, -5, located north of Fourth Street, between Hellman and Archibald Avenues, submitted by Cornerpointe 85, LLC. 26. Approval to accept the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase I Utility 162 Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4th Street to approximately 350 feet south of 8th Street, Contract No. 01-089, as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $570,791.84. RESOLUTION NO. 02-097 '164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE I UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS FROM 4TM STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 01-089 AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK th 27. Approval to accept the 6 Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Hellman 165 Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 01-101 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $190,735.44. RESOLUTION NO. 02-098 '16'/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-101, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 9 28. Approval to accept the Construction of the Foothill Boulevard Median 168 Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project, Contract No. 00-014 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $7,815,506.91. RESOLUTION NO. 02-099 170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 00-014, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 29. Approval to accept the Construction of the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II, Contract No. 00-096 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a 171 Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $1,679,188.13. RESOLUTION NO. 02-100 173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE METROLINK STATION EXPANSION, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 00-096, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 30. Approval to accept the Construction of the Red Hill park Storage 174 Building and Storage Shed and the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Bid Alternate No. 2 (Buildings A & B), Contract No. 01-055 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $142,093.00. RESOLUTION NO. 02-101 176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RED HILL PARK STORAGE BUILDING AND STORAGE SHED AND THE HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BID ALTERNATE NO. 2 (BUILDINGS A & B), CONTRACT NO. 01-055, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 10 31. Approval to accept the Construction of Banyan Street Right Turn Lane 177 west of Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 01-100 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $62,478.26. RESOLUTION NO. 02-102 179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-100, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 32. Approval to accept the Construction of the Civic Center East Parking 180 Lot Expansion, Contract No. 01-070 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $528,956.77. RESOLUTION NO. 02-103 182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION, CONTRACT NO. 01-070, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 33. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's '183 Repods and setting of Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to Levy the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 02-104 '185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 11 RESOLUTION NO. 02-105 188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. 34. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and setting of Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to Levy and 189 Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 02-106 '191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 02-107 193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. 35. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 194 Reports and setting the Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to Levy and Annual Assessments for Fiscal year 2002/2003 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 12 RESOLUTION NO. 02-108 196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 02-109 199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN AND AMETHYST AVENUE ORDINANCE NO. 680 (second reading) 200 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 13 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - 202 FORECAST CORPORATION - The appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to subdivide 24.2 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 and a portion of 17. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 6, 2002) CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION The appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to construct 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8- 14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04-, 05-, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 and a portion of 17. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DR2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 6, 2002) RESOLUTION NO. 02-071 374 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227- 211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17 City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 14 RESOLUTION NO. 02-072 377 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2001-00557 TO CONSTRUCT 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND ~N THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17 2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED 380 GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA RESOLUTION NO. 02-061 382 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES (FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 02-062 385 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT City Council Agenda March 20, 2002 15 G.~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 386 UPDATE J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 14, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 6, 2002 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 6, 2002 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II1: Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor; Julie Ungashick; Management Analyst I; Brad Buller, City Planner; Kirt Coury, Associate Planner; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst II; Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Fire Explorer presentation to the City Council and Fire Chief Dennis Michael in appreciation for all the support they have given to the Exploring Organization. Greg Shull made the presentation to Chief Michael and the City Council. B2. Presentation of an Energy Conservation Rebate Check from Southern California Edison (SCE) to the City Council for retrofit work done in the City. Elva Rubacalva with Southern California Edison made the presentation of the check to the City Council. B3. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Public Works Maintenance Manager and City Facility Supervisor on behalf of the Public Works Staff who worked to promote energy conservation as a part of the retrofit project. Mayor Alexander presented certificates to Dave Blevins and Dale Catron with certificates also presented which would be forwarded to the public works staff. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. John Lyons congratulated Bob Dutton and Paul Biane on their election victory of March 5, 2002. He added he had gone to the new DMV office and reported it went very well. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is requested that item 6 be removed from the agenda and would return at a future meeting. DI. Approval of Minutes: February 20, 2002 February 21,2002 (Adjourned Meeting) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/23/02 and 2/20/02 and Payroll ending 2/24/02 for the total amount of $3,229,609.09. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, to be funded from Account No. 11243035650/XXXX124-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, to be funded from Account No. 11243035650/XXXX124-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with ABS Consulting {CO 02-010) for architectural, engineering, design and bid services for seismic upgrades of the Civic Center, and approval of a budget appropriation of $187,500 to be funded from Capital Facilities Repair Account No. 1025-001-5300. D6. Approval of a Resolution adopting the updated General City Master Plan of Drainage Report and approval of a Resolution establishing an Updated Drainage Improvement Fees for all development within the General City Local Drainage Area. REMOVED FROM AGENDA. TO RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING. RESOLUTION NO. 02-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES (FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT D7. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for DR 00-61, located on the south and west sides of the Knuckle Intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street, submitted by Southern California Housing Development Corporation and Malvern Housing Partners, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 02-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-61 RESOLUTION NO. 02-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 FOR DR 00-61 DS. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract 16021, located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, submitted by Crestwood Corporation, a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 02-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16021, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 02-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16021 D9. Approval to accept the Bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $2,271,522.00 ($2,065,020.00, plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Mike Bubalo Construction Co., Inc. (CO 02-013), for Construction of the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' north of Church Street to 500' north of Base Line Road, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1301176-0, Drainage Funds, Acct. No. 11123035650/1292112-0, AD 84-2 Funds, Acct. No. 16043035300, and AD 86-2 Funds, Acct. No. 16063035300. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER BIANE. D10. Approval of a Contract Amendment with JDC, Inc. for the "City Wide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement (CO 01-075). City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 4 Dll. Approval of the Construction and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (CO 02-014), for the proposed widening improvements to the Etiwanda Avenue At-Grade Railroad Crossing, located south of Whittram Avenue, designated as CPUCCrossing No. 101 SG-44.10 and U.S. Department of Transportation No. 026151P. RESOLUTION NO. 02-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY (SCRRA), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ETIWANDA AVENUE AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, LOCATED SOUTH OF WHITTRAM AVENUE, DESIGNATED AS CPUC CROSSING NO. 101 SG-44.10 AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NO. 026151P D12. Approval of the Construction and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (CO 02-015), for the proposed widening improvements to the Hermosa Avenue At-Grade Railroad Crossing, located south of th 8 Street, designated as CPUC Crossing No. 101 SG-40.60 and U.S. Department of Transportation No. 026160N. RESOLUTION NO. 02-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY (SCRRA), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HERMOSA AVENUE AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, LOCATED SOUTH OF 8TM STREET, DESIGNATED AS CPUC CROSSING NO. 101 SG-40.60 AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NO. 026160N D13. Approval of an Underground Communication Facilities Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Verizon California, Inc. (CO 02-016) for the Lower Hermosa Avenue-Phase 2, Storm Drain, Street Widening and Utility Underground Improvements from 350 feet south of 8th Street to north of the Metrolink Railroad Tracks. RESOLUTION NO. 02-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND FACILITIES FOR THE LOWER HERMOSA, PHASE 2, STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING AND UTILITY UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS FROM 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH OF THE METROLINK RAILROAD TRACKS City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 5 D14. Approval of a Cooperative Agreement with the County of San Bernardino (CO 02-017) relating to the provision of First Time Homebuyer Programs. D15. Approval to execute an Addendum to the Epicenter Rental Contract with the Rancho Cucamonga High School for Waiver of Rental Fees associated with Graduation Ceremonies at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter in exchange for City use of the Rancho Cucamonga High School's Gymnasium for the City's Youth Basketball Program for 2003 and 2004. D16. Approval to release the Labor and Material Bond for Tract 13812, submitted by Wealth V, LLC, located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues. D17. Approval to accept the construction of the Lower Hermosa Storm Drain and Street Widening- Phase I, Contract No. 00-078, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 02-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LOWER HERMOSA STORM DRAIN AND STREET WIDENING, PHASE 1, CONTRACT NO. 00-078 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items D6 and D9. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM 9. Approval to accept the Bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $2,271,522.00 ($2,065,020.00, plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Mike Bubalo Construction Co., Inc. (CO 02-013), for Construction of the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' north of Church Street to 500' north of Base Line Road, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Acct. No. 1176303565011301176-0, Drainage Funds, Acct. No. 11123035650/'1292112-0, AD 84-2 Funds, Acct. No. 16043035300, and AD 86-2 Funds, Acct. No. 16063035300. Councilmember Diane inquired about the design of the project with Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, answering his questions. MOTION: Moved by Diane, seconded by Williams to approve item D9. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El'. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02 (CO 02-012) - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. - A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed review of a master plan for a project known as Victoria Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of approximately 2.45 million square foot retail, office, and civic uses as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land. The project site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 Freeway to the east, and the future Day Creek Boulevard to the west. APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201- 30, 33, 35 and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 thru 43. Related files: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, Tentative Parcer Map 15716. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Center to Mixed Use and modifying various text sections and graphics in the Community Plan to accommodate the proposed project known as the Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 Freeway to the east, and the future Day Creek Boulevard to the west. APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35 and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 thru 43. Related files: Development Agreement 01-02, Tentative Parcel Map 15716. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance Nos. 678 and 679. ORDINANCE NO. 678 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 01-02, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VICTORIA GARDENS-C, LLC. INCLUDING A MASTER PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING APPROXIMATELY 2.45 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, OFFICE, AND CIVIC USES AS WELL AS 600 MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND. THE PROJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY AND THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, 1-15 TO THE EAST, AND FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35 and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 thru 43 ORDINANCE NO. 679 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM REGIONAL CENTER TO MIXED USE AND MODIFYING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS IN THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED PROJECT KNOWN AS VICTORIA GARDENS ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, 1-15 FREEWAY TO THE EAST, AND FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 678 and 679. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page '7 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION -The appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to subdivide 24.2 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 and a portion of 17. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - The appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to construct 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04-, 05-, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 and a portion of 17. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DR2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff report presented by Kid Court, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander stated he has heard that there has been conversation between the parties to try to resolve this and added he felt there has to be "give and take" between everyone. He asked if all involved would consider a continuance to see if they can work things out. The appellants stated they are willing to do this. Councilmember Williams asked if the developer is willing to continue the matter. Forecast Corporation stated they are not willing to continue this. Councilmember Williams stated their comments and attitude concern her. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Danny Sandoval, Chervill Street, felt this project would affect everyone's financial investment by lowering their property values. He felt the developers should be required to acquire their properties before they get the final approval for this development. He stated if the developer is unwilling to offer a reasonable price so they can relocate before construction, he felt they should be required to meet certain conditions of approval to protect them. He stated these conditions are: 1) change the zoning to match surrounding medium density zoning so they are no longer surrounded on three and-a-half sides by medium density; 2) require a fifteen foot easement on Forecast property at the south side of Chervill at Etiwanda Avenue to widen Chervill Street to meet fire access standards and to allow proper ingress and egress from their surrounding properties to accommodate traffic of a future higher density development; 3) according to California State law they need to have a large enough easement on the west end of Chervill Street for proper turn around of service vehicles, emergency vehicles, guests, etc. For safety reasons, building a wall that blocks their access to this easement would force vehicles to back up the entire length of the 700' road out onto Etiwanda Avenue. He stated they request the City require the developer to set the perimeter block wall back 30' from its proposed location at the west end of Chervill Street to allow for safe and adequate turn-around. He stated they would go through the courts to get this if necessary; and 4) He added at the public hearing of January 23, 2002, it was agreed upon by the Planning Commission and Mr. Previty that all utilities would be stubbed out to a maximum density of fourteen units per acre at Forecast expense with no need for reimbursement by the residents or the City at both the Southern portion of their properties City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page $ and the Northwestern corner of their adjacent properties where they showed just water and sewer. He stated after reading the Resolution and hearing information tonight, he felt this was not the case. He stated he did not feel that was the intention of the Planning Commission. He felt this should be postponed so they can talk to all the City Council members. He felt their rights should be protected. Don Glover felt it was the City Council's duty to look into this before today. He stated he does not agree with having to share his driveway with 340 apartments. He added he would not accept $250,000 for his house offered by Mr. Previty. Wes LeNier representing himself and Gall Timm, stated he concurred with everything his neighbors stated. He felt more conversation was needed to get this resolved. He felt Forecast should give up about fifteen feet of easement for the driveways. He also stated there are Redtail Hawks n the Eucalyptus Trees by them. Mr. Previty stated if the Council wants them to continue this for two weeks, he will do that. He stated are willing to continue this for two more weeks. He stated he is sorry he was short with Councilmember Williams. Councilmember Williams stated if they own all of the property it would be less of a headache and hoped they realize there is a cost to do this. Mayor Alexander stated the residents should have known more about this. He hoped this would get continued. He stated the developer has worked very hard on this, but understands what the property owners are saying also. Councilmember Biane stated he hoped they can talk about this further over the next couple weeks and resolve things. Councilmember Dutton stated he has been out to the project site and talked to the property owners. He stated he hoped they can come to some agreement by continuing this matter, but isn't sure it will be productive if it is continued. He stated his thought was if the concern is that people are getting paid fair compensation, it was suggested by one of the property owners that the Eminent Domain process be used to acquire the property. He stated this way the City would be in control of making sure there is a fair and impartial appraisal done on the property. He stated at least the property owners would know they got a fair deal. Councilmember Williams inquired about the condemnation process. James Markman, City Attorney, stated first there would have to be a public purpose to even commence a condemnation proceeding. He stated the City can't make an offer to buy a piece of property in eminent domain until an appraisal has been done on the property. He added that would have to be an appraiser that the City would choose that would be MAI and very qualified to come up with a fair market value number. He stated the Council would have to review his work and establish the fair market value based on the appraisal, and then make an offer to that property owner for no less than that fair market value number. He stated the owner could agree or not agree and negotiate or not negotiate. If that is not successful, then the Council would have to set a necessity hearing to proceed the condemnation and show the need for public necessity of taking the property. He stated if that failed there would be a legal proceeding for a court or jury trial to settle this. Councilmember Dutton suggested that staff get the Council the costs for all of the condemnation process in case they can't come up with an agreement. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he has heard the property closest to Etiwanda does not want to sell. Councilmember Williams felt staff should have direct conversation with the property owner. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page 9 Councilmember Curatalo stated she hopes this can be continued for two weeks so things can be worked out. RESOLUTION NO. 02-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17 RESOLUTION NO. 02-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2001-00557 TO CONSTRUCT 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing for March 20, 2002, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center complex located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS Gl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN AND AMETHYST AVENUE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Biane stated he felt Wilson was 45 mph. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they are making this consistent with the study. Councilmember Dutton asked if it can all be made the same speed limit. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they it must conform with the results of the study. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated if a ticket is given, the speed limit posted would have to conform to the study in order for it to hold up. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page t0 Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 680. ORDINANCE NO. 680 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading for March 20, 2002. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS HI. PRESENTATION ON THE CITY'S FIRST EDITION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPORTER COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER. (Oral) Staff report presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst I1. ACTION: Report received and filed. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. UPDATE ON LEGISLATIVE ISSUES (Oral) Update given by Councilmember Williams informing the Council about the League of California Cities Legislative Task Force. Mayor Alexander stated Councilmember Williams was elected to serve her third term on the LAFCO Board. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were submitted. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC KI. Brian Brock, 11863 Lazio, inquired about the sound walls for the Fieldstone project. He stated he was wondering about the results of the study that took place. He asked that this be placed on the next Council agenda. Mayor Alexander suggested they go to the next Route 30 Task Force meeting and that they can make a recommendation to Caltrans if necessary. City Council Minutes March 6, 2002 Page Councilmember Williams asked if Joe O'Neil could look into the study being done. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated SANBAG's study was done, but that there was an independent study also being done and he did not have that study yet. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * Working for the City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County's half-cent transportation sales tax Measure I Revenue, llOne of the mast critical elements of any oily or local community is adequate transpor- The First 10 Years ration routes. Without local revenue like Measure I, we lose our ability to assure Local Streets, Roads Only proper transportation and road maintenance.~ --B///A/exen#er,~eyer I~ember, SANSAG Soerd of D/rectors · 1990-91: $846,793 Adopted by San 8ernardino County voters in 1989, Measure I is a major source of revenue for · 1991-92: $824,556 transportation improvements in lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga. This 20-year half-cent sales tax has provided more than $14 million for Rancho Cucamonga's streels and roads during lhe first 10 years. · 1992-93: $887,223 Local officials make decisions about the allocation of these funds. Additional Measure I funds -- a total of $406 million - have been pooled by all of the cities and · 1993-94: $845,989 unincorporated areas in the valley region of San 8ernardino County. These pooled funds support · 1994-95: $983,946 freeway improvements, Metrolink trains, Omnitrans subsidies for elderly and disabled riders, major streets that serve as transportation arteries, ridesharing programs, landscaping and Iraffic manage- · 1995-96:$1,009,849 ment. Measure I clearly is working for lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga! · 1996-97: $1,192,564 · 997-98:s3,323,3s7 Rancho Cucamonga projects: A decade in review · 1998-99:$1,556,775 ~ easure I funds received each year by · Railroad crossing at Haven Avenue and Santa · 1999-00:$2,573,819 Mthe City of Rancho Cucamonga are Fe Railroad, ~991-1993 ($J90,275) ldesignated for local streets and roads. · Modifications to insection at Archibald Avenue Total: $14,044,871 Some of these projecls include: and 4th Street, ~996-1999 ($275,679) · Construction of Day Creek 8oulevard, 1997- · Pavement rehabilitation of Sapphire Avenue, Figures include interest income 2000 ($1,211,354) 2000 ($208,160) · Pavement rehabilitation, citywide, 1995-2000 · Widening, rehabilitation and paving of ($917,020) Hermosa Avenue, 1996-1998 ($203,497) · Widening and rehabilitation of 191h Street, · Coordination and improvements to traffic 1993-1997 ($1,009,160) signal s, citywide, 1996-1998 (SI 61,970) · Widening, new paving and storm drain · Improvements to Carnelian Streel, San improvements to Haven Avenue, 1991-2000 Bernardino Road to Baseline, 1994-1997 ($997,706) ($124,718) · Bridge widening and median island construe- · Widening nnd rehabilitation of Jersey Avenue, SAI IBAG lion on Foolhill Boulevard, 2000 ($907,677) 1996-1998 ($127,481) · Improvements to Baseline and Milliken Avenue, 1992 ($332,579) ?/ease see reverse s/de for information abaut www. sanbag.ca.gov projects funded b? pooled /~easure / revenue. San Bernardlno Associated Governments · 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardlno, CA 92401 · (909) 884-8276 City of Rancho Cucarnonga · 10500 Civic Center Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2740 · www. cLrancho-cucamonga.ca.us Highlights of Measure I Expenditures Page 2 SB Volley pools funds to support regional projects Measure I Revenue, The First 10 Years C ities and unincorporated regions in the valley funds allows these communities to maximize their portion of San Bernardino Counly -- all areas resources. Projects include freeways, Metrolink, SB Valley Pooled Projects except the deserts and mountains -- combine most Omnitrans, major streets, and traffic management/ · Freeways: $269,878,700 of their Measure I funds for transportation projects environmental efforts, such as congeslion relief, · Major Slreels: $58,678,057 that benefit all of the valley communities. Pooling landscaping and clean fuels. · Metrolink: $39,101,886 ...... · Omnitrans: $29,313,802 · Traffic management/ · Freeway improvement projects environmental: $9,788,086 As the Inland Empire continues to grow, so does the State Route 60 between the Los Angeles County line and Total: $406,760,53 I need for efficient freeway systems. Measure ~ is the Interstate 15. This was completed Jn 1997. Iocalfundingsourceforbuildingnewfreewaysand · 8uildingthenewStateRoute71inChinoandChino · Omnitranssupport widening existing routes. In most cases, Caltrans Hills, which transformed a two-lane highway to eight Measure I provides discounts serves as a partner for these construction projects, lanes of efficient freeway. State Route 71 opened to The largest freeway project funded by Measure I is traffic in 1997. to elderly and disabled Omnitrans the construction of Slate Route 210, also known asthe · Constructing 9.9 miles of carpool lanes on Interstate riders. Passengers on fixed roates Foothill Freeway, which will cover 28.2 miles between 10 through MonlctaJr and Ontario, which was finished in receive a five-cent fare reduction, La Verne and San Bemardino. About 23 mi~es of the new 2000. and those using Yucaipa's Dial-a- Ride service receive a 25-cent freeway are in San Bernardino County. A six-mile discount. A large portion of the portion of State Route 210 opened in August 2001 in Coming soon ... Measure I funds also subsidize Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. An additional 14 miles Upcoming Measure I projects are the construction of is under construction now Jn Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, a 3.7-mile truck-climbing lane on Interstate 10 between fares and operating expenses for the curbside Access service for Claremont and La Verne and will be complete in fall Redlands and Yucaipa;the widening of 2.5 miles of disabled users. 2002. Construction on portions east of Fontana through Interstate 10 in downtown Redlands;the widening of six Rialto and San Bernardino will begin in early 2003. miles of Interstate 215 in downtown San Berrmrdino; end Other major projects have included: environmental analysis for the widening of four miles of · Arterial streets · Widening and ad4Jng carpool lanes10 I0 miles of interstate 215 in Colton and Grand Terrace. Arterial streets are those that function as maior thoroughfares · MetrolJnktrainservice · Traffic management/environmental °r"arteries"f°rtheregi°n' Measure I funds support needed The passage of Measure I in 1989 laid the tracks enhance ment activities widening and bridge improve- for the Metrolink commuter rail service. Metrolink Measure I supports several programs to manage merits on these streets. serves San Bernardino County and Southern California traffic and improve the local environment. These Examples of streets improved by providing reliable, fast, cleon transportation to include a countywide Congeslion Management by Measure I are: Beryl, Milliken jobs and entertainment centers. Program to track and reduce freeway and street and Haven in Rancho Cucamonga; Measure I funded lhe purchase of railroad right-of- congestion,traffic forecasting and development ofRiverside and Easton in RJaJto; way, track rights, station construdion, track andnon-potable water sources to irrigate freeway Benson, Campus and Mountain Jn signal improvements and locomotive and passenger landscaping. To improve air quality, Measure I also Upland; Pepper in Colton; Sierra in cars. Ongoing operational costs are funded by fares, funds traffic signal synchronization planning for the Fontana; Euclid in Chino; Baseline The San 8ernardino-Los Angeles line opened in network of major arterial streets, rideshare in Highland;Butterfield in Chino October ! 992, and the Inland Empfre-Orange County incentives and clean fuel vehicle programs. Hills; Monte Vista in MontdaJr; line began operating in Odober 1995. and E Street Jn San Bernardino. CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND-NCE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180053 006451 A ~ A AUTOMOTIVE 02/27/02 390.05 ~FW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180054 004635 A ~ K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 02/27/02 5.95 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180055 007014 A G SOD FARMS INC 02/27/02 449.08 954 OH AP00180056 000797 A Hg%RLEQUIN COSTUME 02/27/02 172.53 ~ OH AP00180057 000001 A3% EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 02/27/02 53.59 ~W OH AP00180058 006937 ACCELA 02/27/02 350.00 ~ OH AP00180059 004347 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO ;%ND TRUCK 02/27/02 423.61 5TW OH AP00180060 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 02/27/02 1,056.00 ~{W OS AP00180061 021700 AIR LIQUIDE D24ERICA CORPORATI 02/27/02 125.26 MW OH AP00180062 021790 ALCORN, RIC~L~RD 02/27/02 207.40 Nf6 OH AP00180063 006199 ALL ~4ERICAN ASPN3~LT 02/27/02 8,676.00 ~4W OH AP00180064 005673 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 02/27/02 221.67 ~ OH AP00180065 000017 DJ~TA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 02/27/02 143.00 NfW OH AP00180066 005409 ~34ERICA-N PLUMBING PARTSMASTER 02/27/02 22.63 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180067 006715 AMERIC~ TRAINING RECOURCE IN 02/27/02 427.59 MW OH AP00180068 001366 D~4ERICAS BODY COMPANY 02/27/02 1,396.73 MW OH AP00180069 002693 { ;~qTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 02/27/02 187.39 N~ OH AP00180070 000024 ARBOR NURSERY INC 02/27/02 996.69 MW OH AP00180071 002299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES 02/27/02 143.09 MW OH AP00180072 000310 ARROW TRUCK BODIES ~ EQUIPM 02/27/02 402.02 5TW OH AP00180073 000667 ARROWHE~ CREDIT b~NION 02/27/02 5,468.04 ~5~ OH AP00180074 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 02/27/02 2,060.75 MW OH AP00180075 006115 AUFBAU CORPORATION 02/27/02 16,100.00 MW OH AP00180076 001135 AUTO SPECIALISTS 02/27/02 1,123.45 HW OH AP00180077 006747 B Ai~D R AUTO SERVICE 02/27/02 252.81 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER page WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~dgcE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREGq Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180078 090201 B~{IA HOTEL 0~/27/02 527.10 F~ OH AP00180079 007026 BARBER INC 02/27/02 1,000.00 ~ OH AP00180080 000033 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDW~RE 02/27/02 124.02 ~ OB AP00180081 007012 BELL ENTERPRISES 02/27/02 195.20 MW OH AP00180082 007015 BILLBOARD DIRECTORIES 02/27/02 184.78 ~ OH AP00180083 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 02/27/02 1,461.09 MW OH AP00180084 007013 BONIFACIO, ROSARIO 02/27/02 200.00 MW OH AP00180085 003863 BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER 02/27/02 388.12 MW OH AP00180086 005341 BUCKNAM ~ ASSOCIATES 02/27/02 3,278.19 MW OH AP00180087 005746 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 02/27/02 7,626.14 MW OH AP00180088 006545 CAFE JUSTICE 02/27/02 72.00 MW OH AP00180089 006713 CALIFOP~NIA OVERNIGHT 02/27/02 19.00 MW OH AP00180090 001223 CALSENSE 02/27/02 607.57 MW OH AP00180091 007027 CCPOA SUZJ%ArNE THO~%S VICRIE C 02/27/02 297.00 MW OH AP00180092 004949 CLOL~T 02/27/02 64.00 MW OH AP00180093 006215 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 02/27/02 193.73 MW OH AP00180094 004211 COAST RECREATION INC 02/27/02 597.22 MW OH AP00180095 021959 COM~3NITY BAPTIST CHURCH 02/27/02 450.00 MW OH AP00180096 001421 COMPLETE COACH WORKS 02/27/02 19,060.19 MW OH AP00180097 001328 CONCD-NNON, S~L~RI 02/27/02 199.50 MW OH AP00180098 006709 COPP CRUSHING CORP, D~ 02/27/02 20.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180099 000930 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 02/27/02 996.69 MW OH AP00180100 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 02/27/02 200.00 MW OH AP00180101 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 02/27/02 118.50 MW OH AP00180102 001409 CPSRPTC 02/27/02 337.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loe: FINANCE---job: 77197 #E080 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180103 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180104 000085 CUCA~ONGA CO WATER DIET 02/27/02 10,008.74 MW OH AP00180105 005896 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 02/27/02 770.00 MW OH AP00180106 005596 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 02/27/02 420.00 MW OH AP00180107 006852 CUETO, TONYA 02/27/02 10.00 MW OH AP00180108 002512 D A R E AMERICA 02/27/02 508.28 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180109 000105 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 02/27/02 3,565.00 MW OH AP001801t0 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 02/27/02 91.99 MW OH AP00180111 005063 DE LA MORA, ~ARIO 02/27/02 38.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180112 001290 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 02/27/02 21.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180113 007021 DEMARCO, DEBRA 02/27/02 14.00 MW OH APO0180114 004844 DICK, ERIC 02/27/02 332.50 MW OH AP00180115 000839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 02/27/02 202.66 MW OH AP00180116 007009 DOUGLAS LEATHER ~ SPORTING 02/27/02 1,780.03 MW OH AP00180117 003297 E G N CONSTRUCTION INC 02/27/02 56,230.43 MW OH AP00180118 004468 ESCOBAR, SA/gTIAGO 02/27/02 35.00 MW OR AP00180119 005567 EXPRESS OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS 02/27/02 2,636.14 MW OH AP00180120 000124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLA~-D INC 02/27/02 2,006.73 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180121 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 02/27/02 4,646.61 MW OH AP00180122 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 02/27/02 416.99 MW OH AP00180123 003088 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS INC 02/27/02 2,318.43 MW OH AP00180124 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 02/27/02 614.50 MW OH AP00180125 002840 FORD OF UPLAND INC 02/27/02 380.82 ~{W OH AP00180126 001082 FRANKLIN COVEY CO 02/27/02 94.17 MW OH AP00180127 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 02/27/02 148.43 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND/gCE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180128 000263 GATEWAY 02/27/02 23.00 MW OH AP00180129 000139 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 02/27/02 124.64 5TW OH AP00180130 000650 GRAINGER, WW 02/27/02 893.79 MW OH AP00180131 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 02/27/02 110.21 MW OH AP00180132 041328 GWYNN, JOANN 02/27/02 300.00 MW OR AP00180133 004845 HILLSIDE COMMLINITY CHURCH 02/27/02 1,000.00 ~K~ OH AP00180134 004928 HOCKEY WEST 02/27/02 309.82 ~ OH AP00180135 002255 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 02/27/02 91.59 MW OH AP00180136 001234 BOSE 9L~N INC 02/27/02 7.31 MW OH AP00180137 003634 HOUSE OF RUTH 02/27/02 633.00 ~5~ OH AP00180138 000161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 02/27/02 39.80 MW OW AP00180139 001325 HURST, CHERYL 02/27/02 313.50 5~W OE Payee Name different in Cheek DB AP00180140 000495 BYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 02/27/02 698.22 N~g OH AP00180141 005647 IAEI 02/27/02 60.00 MW OH AP00180142 003276 ICI DULUX PAIATf CENTERS 02/27/02 554.81 ~ OH AP00180143 006918 I~L~GINB THAT 02/27/02 1,250.00 MW OH AP00180144 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBb~FION GROUP 02/27/02 269.95 MW OH AP00180145 006710 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE ~ SERVI 02/27/02 309.46 MW OH AP00180146 000122 INL~/~D VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 02/27/02 1,144.20 5TW OH AP00180147 002315 INLAA!D WHOLESALE NqJRSERY 02/27/02 212.58 MW OH AP00180148 002432 INTELLI TBCH 02/27/02 150.85 MW OH AP00180149 001291 IRON MOUNTAIN OEDP 02/27/02 550.23 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180150 005616 ISA 02/27/02 200.00 MW OH AP00180151 007018 IVES, RONALD 02/27/02 91.45 MW OH AP00180152 002033 J MCLOUGHLIN ENG CO 02/27/02 14,202.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 5 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180153 006919 JONES-WESLEY, DARCELLE 02/27/02 659.38 MW OH AP00180154 007019 KIDS CONSORTIL~M 02/27/02 25~95 MW OH AP00180155 005059 KINKOS COPIES 02/27/02 50.00 ~K~ OH AP00180156 004755 LARSON,' KIRK 02/27/02 30.98 MW OH AP00180157 001865 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK IN 02/27/02 295.00 MW OH AP00180158 007024 LEE'S PLUMBING SERVICE 02/27/02 465.50 MW OH AP00180159 091222 LOPd~AN EDUCATION SERVICES 02/27/02 309.00 MW OH AP00180160 005662 LOS A/~OELES COCA CO~% BTL CO 02/27/02 265.61 MW OH AP00180161 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 02/27/02 251.00 ~ OH AP00180162 005413 LUCKOFF, ~ANS 02/27/02 31.65 ~W OH AP00180163 003156 LUS LIGRTHOUSE INC 02/27/02 809.72 MW OH AP00180164 000549 ~RIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 02/27/02 11,405.72 N54 OH AP00180165 003871 ~u~TT'S ~L~P, DWARE 02/27/02 95.26 MW OH AP00180166 006170 MICROAGE COMPL~rER~4ART 02/27/02 841.36 ~4W OH AP00180167 001020 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS D~ND MIRRO 02/27/02 549.60 ~ OH AP00180168 005269 ~3LBERRY EARLY LEARNING 02/27/02 300.00 MW OH AP00180169 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 02/27/02 13.85 MW OH AP00180170 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 02/27/02 772.18 MW OH APO0180171 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 02/27/02 23,291.97 MW OH AP00180172 002361 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 02/27/02 425.00 MW OH AP00180173 004527 NIKPOUR, MOF3%MMED 02/27/02 70.00 MW OH AP00180174 002582 NOBLE COMPS%NY, R J 02/27/02 169,087.36 MW OH AP00180175 005314 NRPA 02/27/02 70.00 ~W OH AP00180176 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 02/27/02 3,331.61 MW OH AP00180177 005461 ORCHARD SUPPLY ~ARDWARE 02/27/02 960.29 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND/qCE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CNREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180178 006245 ORTIZ LIFT SERVICE 02/27/02 263.75 AP00180179 002921 P A P A 02/27/02 220.00 MW AP00180180 007017 P A/qD C ELECTRIC 02/27/02 3,800.00 MW OH AP00180181 091606 PALM SPRINGS RIVIERA RESORT 02/27/02 732.70 MW AP00180182 004529 PARSAC 02/27/02 50.00 MW AP00180183 006755 PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUADE D~qD 02/27/02 7,487.80 MW OH AP00180184 005720 PERVO PAINT CO 02/27/02 1,580.53 MW AP00180185 006205 PETEPdV~N LL~4BER 02/27/02 13.91 MW AP00180186 004267 PETES RO~9 SERVICE INC 02/27/02 2,560.77 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180187 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 02/27/02 1,391.20 MW AP00180188 006681 POMONA INI~ND VALLEY CO%~CIL 02/27/02 715.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180189 000758 PP~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 02/27/02 198.10 MW OH AP00150190 003444 PROJECT SISTER 02/27/02 46.56 MW OH AP00180191 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 02/27/02 286.77 MW AP00180192 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 02/27/02 14.00 MW OH AP00180193 005899 QUALITY OHE ENGRAVING 02/27/02 32.33 MW AP00180194 001323 QUINTANA, ZITA 02/27/02 193.00 MW AP00180195 000345 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO POWERPI~AN 02/27/02 363.62 MW OH AP00180196 002705 R H F INC 02/27/02 148.83 MW AP00180197 005876 RAD%rLESCU, DAN 02/27/02 70.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180198 011824 P3%ILS TO TP~AILS CONSERVANCY 02/27/02 25.00 AP00180199 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 02/27/02 59~07 MW OH AP00180200 005174 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 02/27/02 1,500.00 5fW OH AP00180201 001324 REINq{APdDTSEN, DEBRA 02/27/02 282.50 MW OH AP00180202 005618 RIC~APdDS WATSON D~N-D GERSHON 02/27/02 13,962.59 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--lo¢: FINkNCE---job: 97197 ~S080 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180203 011898 RIVERA, GEORGE 02/27/02 163.88 MW OH AP00180204 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 02/27/02 226.00 MW OH AP00180205 000626 ROBLES SR, RAUL p 02/27/02 219.00 ~4 OH AP00180206 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMPD~NIES INC 02/27/02 172.99 MW OH AP00180207 006117 S B AND O INC 02/27/02 2,918.00 MW OH AP00180208 004628 S R CONSULT~figTS 02/27/02 1,422.06 MW OH AP00180209 002196 S~S CLUB ~MBERSHIP 02/27/02 45.00 MW OH AP00180210 001298 SM BERN COUNTy ASSESSORS OFF 02/27/02 165.00 MW OH AP00180211 001590 S~N BERN COLTNTY CHILD SUPPORT 02/27/02 200.00 MW OH AP00180212 001590 S~N BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 02/27/02 289.68 MW OH AP00180213 000132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 02/27/02 767.18 MW OH AP00180214 001441 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 02/27/02 1,103.71 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180215 006905 SCOLLON PRODUCTIONS INC 02/27/02 2,810.00 MW OH AP00180216 006909 SILVER LEGACY RESORT ~ CASI 02/27/02 196.29 MW OH AP00180217 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180218 VOID.CONTI~J Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180219 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180220 VOID.CONTIN~J Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 %~4 OH Void AP00180221 001432 SOUTHERi~ CALIFOR/gIA EDISON 02/27/02 15,406.53 MW OH AP00180222 004663 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 02/27/02 138.67 ~fW OH AP00180223 004176 STATE BO/M{D OF EQUALIZATION 02/27/02 938.43 MW OH AP00180224 001335 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FR/tNCHISE 02/27/02 49.65 ~5W OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180225 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUATDA 02/27/02 708.33 MW OH AP00180226 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNqDA 02/27/02 846.28 MW OH AP00180227 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOLggDA 02/27/02 455.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 8 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180228 005281 STERICYCLE INC 02/27/02 949.10 MW OH AP00180229 004132 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 02/27/02 68.25 MW OH AP00180230 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 02/27/02 25.00 MW OH AP00180231 000836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 02/27/02 3,984.76 MW OH AP00180232 002344 TARGET 02/27/02 62.46 ~W OR AP00180233 007011 TEACHING&LEARNING COMPANY 02/27/02 19.95 MW OH AP00180234 003942 TER~INIX INTEP~NATIONAL 02/27/02 134.00 MW OH AP00180235 005506 THOMSEN LANDSCAPE 02/27/02 63,188.10 MW OH AP00180236 002584 TIME WARNER TELECOM 02/27/02 1,250.00 MW OH AP00180237 003388 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 02/27/02 117,255.95 MW OE AP00180238 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 02/27/02 2,630.50 MW OH AP00180239 004788 UNDERGROLrND SVC ALERT OF SO C 02/27/02 258.75 MW OE AP00180240 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 02/27/02 1,786.58 MW OH AP00180241 003912 UNIQUE CREATIONS 02/27/02 309.78 MW OH AP00180242 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 02/27/02 29.11 MW OH AP00180243 000919 UNITED WAY 02/27/02 632.32 MW OH AP00180244 006004 ~/NITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 02/27/02 2,384.51 MW OH AP00180245 006571 URBAN CROSSROADS INC 02/27/02 755.00 MW OH AP00180246 000350 US POSTMASTER 02/27/02 125.00 MW OH AP00180247 007022 VELASQUEZ, JOHN 02/27/02 82~00 MW OH AP00180248 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180249 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 02/27/02 6,066.57 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00150250 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180251 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 02/27/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180252 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/27/02 4,360.72 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 02/27/02 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER page 9 WED, FEB 27, 2002, 6:03 PM --req: KFINCRER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND/~CE---job: 77197 #S080 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180253 006883 VIRTUAL PROJECT Fk~N~i~GER VPM 02/27/02 2,000.00 MW OH AP00180254 001103 VISTA PAINT 02/27/02 605.50 MW OH AP00180255 001329 VOLM, LIZA 02/27/02 112.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180256 000213 WD~XIE 02/27/02 599.62 MW OH AP00180257 005649 WORMD;~qL, AMY 02/27/02 100.00 MW OH AP00180258 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 02/27/02 227.36 MW OH AP00180259 004624 YEE, LARRY 02/27/02 51.00 MW OH AP00180260 002021 YORK INDUSTRIES 02/27/02 474.10 MW OH AP00180261 004405 YWCA OF THE WEST END 02/27/02 798.03 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 8 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 680,867.95 Number of Checks Processed: 201 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 680,867.95 CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 1 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 ~S057 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--o Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180332 000001 AA EQUIPMENT RENTAJ~S CO INC 03/06/0~ 389.25 MW OH AP00180333 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 03/06/02 871.78 MW OH AP00180334 000007 ABLETRONICS 03/06/02 496.90 MW O~ AP00180335 000014 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 03/06/02 434.00 MW OH AP00180336 006309 ADA24SON, RONALD 03/06/02 1,184.00 MW OH AP00180337 000~11 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 03/06/02 297.51 MW OH AP00180338 005679 ADV~CED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 03/06/02 534.69 MW OH AP00180339 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 03/06/02 3,750.00 MW OH AP00180340 005509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 03/06/02 206.75 MW OH AP00180341 021700 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORPORATI 03/06/02 15.71 MW OH AP00180342 000496 ALEXANDER, WILLIA34 J 03/06/02 100.00 MW OH AP00180343 000496 ALEXANDER, WILLIA/4 J 03/06/02 122.27 MW OH AP00180344 007046 ALI, SELMA 03/06/02 72.00 MW OH AP00180345 003448 ALL WELDING 03/06/02 134.00 MW OH AP00180346 006354 D~4AZON.COM CREDIT 03/06/02 79.27 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180347 006354 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 03/06/02 129.93 MW OH Payee Name different in Cheek DB AP00180348 004450 /~MERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 03/06/02 185.00 MW OH AP00180349 000492 AMERICAN PLAN/~ING ASSOCIATION 03/06/02 1,212.00 MW OH AP00180350 002283 A~MS PLANNING RESEARCH CORP 03/06/02 324.78 MW OH AP00180351 002693 D~4TECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 03/06/02 4,810.72 MW OH AP00180352 007044 ANAYA, MONICA 03/06/02 26.40 MW OH AP00180353 000310 ARROW TRUCK BODIES /LND EQUIPM 03/06/02 402.02 MW OH AP00180354 000667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT Ui~ION 03/06/02 45.85 MW OH AP00180355 005478 ASSE 03/06/02 790.00 MW OH AP00180356 005681 AUSTIN, DENETTE 03/06/02 1,000.00 MW OH AR CITY OF RC IFAE (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180357 004102 B D/qD K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 03/06/02 570.98 MW OH AP00180358 007047 BEACH, LISSA 03/06/02 20.00 MW OH AP00180359 006600 BERN MARIEE PROMOTIONAL PRODU 03/06/02 3,393.94 MW OH AP00180360 004407 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 03/06/02 140.00 MW OH AP00180361 004454 BIA-NE, PAUL 03/06/02 100.00 MW OH AP00180362 000041 BISHOP COMPLY 03/06/02 655.26 MW OH AP00180363 006990 BUP~qETT, STEVE 03/06/02 100.00 MW OE AP00180364 002161 BUSINESS A-ND LEG~J~ REPORTS IN 03/06/02 215.92 MW OH AP00180365 002161 BUSINESS ~ LEGAL REPORTS IN 03/06/02 270.17 MW OH AP00180366 002602 BUTLER JR, EgUkNUEL 03/06/02 300.00 MW OH AP00180367 005131 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURE 03/06/02 170.00 MW OH AP00180368 007045 CANFIELD, CHRIS 03/06/02 84.00 MW OH AP00180369 001061 CHAMPION AWARDS A/qD SPECIALIE 03/06/02 94.82 MW OH AP00180370 003140 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 03/06/02 3,276.00 MW OH AP00180371 006464 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 03/06/02 15,744.00 MW OH AP00180372 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180373 000130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 03/06/02 23,690.63 9E4 OH AP00180374 001420 CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES 03/06/02 4,630.00 MW OH AP00180375 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180376 VOID.CONTINWJ Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180377 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 03/06/02 30,942.88 MW OH AP00180378 005596 CUC~4ONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 03/06/02 1,540.00 MW OH AP00180379 000239 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANy 03/06/02 2,807.99 MW OH AP00180380 007048 DAACA, RACHELLE 03/06/02 32.00 MW OH AP00180381 000105 DD/~ GUEREA AND ASSOCIATES 03/06/02 21,288.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pave 3 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180382 005063 DE LA MORA, MARIO 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180383 005809 DIETERICH POST COMPD~NY 03/06/02 427.42 MW OH AP00180384 004634 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORA 03/06/02 300.67 MW OH AP00180385 004205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC 03/06/02 58.95 MW OH AP00180386 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 03/06/02 56.03 MW OH AP00180387 005937 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 03/06/02 49.50 MW OH AP00180388 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 03/06/02 2,838.57 MW OH AP00180389 004436 EPIXTECH INC 03/06/02 425.32 MW OH AP00180390 004468 ESCOBAR, S~IAGO 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH AP00180391 000229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 03/06/02 559.42 MW OH AP00180392 007049 FARLOW, FRAN 03/06/02 31.00 MW OH AP00180393 005917 FASTENAL COMP/%NY 03/06/02 98.05 MW OH AP00180394 007050 FENN, BRENDA 03/06/02 5.00 MW OH AP00180395 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 03/06/02 9,275.04 MW OH AP00180396 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 03/06/02 103.44 MW OH AP00180397 007051 FLEMING, ARLENE 03/06/02 62.00 MW OH AP00180398 006440 FLUORESCO LIGHTING 03/06/02 843.44 MW OH AP00180399 007052 GABEL, SANDRA 03/06/02 24.00 MW OH AP00180400 006232 GADABOUT TOURS INC 03/06/02 1,223.60 ~W OH AP00180401 004540 GDJ~E GROUP,THE 03/06/02 148.43 MW OR AP00180402 005288 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING ~ S 03/06/02 2,435.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180403 001152 GCS SERVICE INC 03/06/02 351.76 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180404 005928 GE SUPPLY 03/06/02 1,397.50 MW OH AP00180405 003270 GENEP3LL NETWORKS CORP 03/06/02 251.25 MW OH AP00180406 005787 GOLDN WEST SURPLUS 03/06/02 1,203.82 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAB (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... prog: CH200 <l.37>--report id: CHREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180407 000650 GRAINGER, WW 03/06/02 587.19 MW OH AP00180408 004486 GUARDI~ 03/06/02 2,904.56 ~ OH AP00180409 007053 GUSTIS, COLLEEN 03/06/02 200.00 MW OH AP00180410 004525 HAAKBR EQUIPMENT CO 03/06/02 675.37 MW OH AP00180411 004777 HADLEY, PHYLLIS 03/06/02 62.00 MW OH AP00180412 005699 HARALDJ4BOS BEVERAGE COMPA~Ny 03/06/02 425.94 ~K~ OH AP00180413 001244 ~L~VEN BUILDING ~L~TERIALS 03/06/02 7.42 ~K~ OH AP00180414 000462 HCS CL~LER STEEL CO 03/06/02 38.17 ~ OH AP00180415 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 03/06/02 4,763.14 MW OH AP00180416 001234 HOSE ~ INC 03/06/02 72.61 MW OH AP00180417 007029 HL~V~4EL, KAREN 03/06/02 110.00 MW OH AP00180418 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 190.78 ~4W OH AP00180419 001358 HYATT Pd~GENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 381.56 MW OH AP00180420 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 572.34 MW OH AP00180421 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 190.78 9D~ OH AP00180422 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 190.78 MW OH AP00180423 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 03/06/02 572.34 MW OH AP00180424 007030 HYATT REGENCY PHOENIX 03/06/02 1,300.01 MW OH AP00180425 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 03/06/02 684.62 MW OH AP00180426 005675 ICBO S~ DIEGO C~L~PTER 03/06/02 50.00 MW OH AP00180427 000167 ICBO 03/06/02 60.00 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180428 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CHAffERS 03/06/02 1,964.97 ~ OH AP00180429 004878 IE~ 03/06/02 25.00 ~ OH AP0018043Q 006710 INDUSTRI~J~ ~L~RDWARE ~ SBRVI 03/06/02 481.59 954 OH AP00180431 000092 INL/LNqD VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 03/06/02 156.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 WED, ~ULR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req~ KFINCHER--leg~ GL JL--loc: FIN~gCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Cheek ~nount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180432 005193 IN=fERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 03/06/02 78.50 ~ OH AP00180433 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 03/06/02 46.28 MW OH AP00180434 003452 IN~RAVAIA ROCK ~AgD S~ND 03/06/02 557.75 MW OH AP00180435 002507 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 03/06/02 14,782.00 MW OH AP00180436 002462 J D C INC 03/06/02 17,292.30 MW OH AP00180437 091003 J J KELLER ~2gD ASSOC INC 03/06/02 252.09 MW OH AP00180438 001941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON 03/06/02 25,034.59 MW OH AP00180439 000175 JOBS AVAILABLE 03/06/02 198.72 MW OH AP00180440 007031 JOHNSON, KIRK 03/06/02 46.00 MW OH AP00180441 005283 JONES A~rD MAYER, LAW OFFICES 03/06/02 2,500.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180442 007032 JOR/DAN, MICHELLE 03/06/02 65.45 ~4W OH AP00180443 000179 KAISER FOUN~DATION HF2~LTH PLAN 03/06/02 44,191.00 FS~ OH AP00180444 006938 F~NDA~3~R, AI~4 03/06/02 200.00 ~W OH AP00180445 000149 KING, LD 03/06/02 1,624.50 ~ OH AP00180446 007033 KOEHLER, MIC}{AEL 03/06/02 81.00 ~ OH AP00180447 006516 KRUSE, JOD~N A 03/06/02 940.00 ~ OH AP00180448 001075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 03/06/02 20.81 ~ OH AP00180449 004217 I~DNER COATINGS INC 03/06/02 1,855.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180450 002633 I~4, JACK 03/06/02 131.48 MW OH AP00180451 000195 LD2gCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 03/06/02 1,500.00 ~K~ OH AP00180452 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 03/06/02 772.33 ~K~ OH AP00180453 001005 LIL STITCH 03/06/02 801.74 ~K~ OH AP00180454 000200 LOS ~GELES TIMES 03/06/02 105.60 ~4 OH AP00180455 007034 LOTICH, MELISSA 03/06/02 36.00 ~ OH AP00180456 003156 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 03/06/02 1,763.44 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CEECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, ~ 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Mount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180457 006891 ~ULqMOND, MOH~4ED 03/06/02 73.00 MW OH AP00180458 000549 ~U~RIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 03/06/02 25,901.63 MW OH AP00180459 000072 ~RK CHRIS INC 03/06/02 209.91 MW OH AP00180460 005207 ~U~RSHALL CAVENDISH CORP 03/06/02 113.53 ~ OH Payee Name different in Cheek DB AP00180461 004727 ~ARSRALL PLU~4BING 03/06/02 284.00 MW OH AP00180462 005560 ~RVAC 03/06/02 97.19 5TW OH AP00180463 005375 5~%STER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 03/06/02 3,775.00 MW OH AP00180464 007038 MCKAY, LJ~URA 03/06/02 40.00 ~4W OR AP00180465 001025 MCMASTER C3%RR SUPPLY COMPANY 03/06/02 1,082.17 MW OH AP00180466 000602 MEYER, PAT 03/06/02 15.00 MW OH AP00180467 006170 MICROAGE COMPUTER~4ART 03/06/02 3,824.88 MW OB AP00180468 004164 MIDDLESEX OFFICE SUPPLY INC 03/06/02 379.99 ~5~ OR AP00180469 004374 MOBILE BTORkGE GROUP INC 03/06/02 151.17 ~ OH AP00180470 002248 NAPA ALamO PARTS 03/06/02 914.92 ~4W OH AP00180471 002837 AL~TIONAL CONSTRUCTION P~ENTALS 03/06/02 128~46 MW OR Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180472 006687 NATIONS RENT 03/06/02 88.89 5TW OH AP00180473 004527 NIRPOUR, MOHAMMED 03/06/02 170.00 MW OR AP00180474 VOID.CONTI~ Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180475 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 03/06/02 2,767.37 MW OE AP00180476 005403 OFFICE NU~X 03/06/02 74.25 MW OR AP00180477 007056 OLYMPIC RESORT HOTEL ~ SPA 03/06/02 113.85 MW OR AP00180478 000224 OR~/qGE CO~TY STRIPING SERVIC 03/06/02 2,058.65 MW OH AP00180479 004904 OTT, L~UR3% 03/06/02 487.00 MW OH AP00180480 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 03/06/02 6,015.42 MW OH AP00180481 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP D2qD IRRIGATION 03/06/02 60.25 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, ~R 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIAL~i~CE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~J~ount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180482 005343 PACIFIC PLL~BING SPECIALTIES 03/06/02 309.71 MW OH AP00180483 005452 PACIFIC L~fILITY EQUIPMEN~ CO 03/06/02 25.15 ~ OH AP00180484 006287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFOR/qIA 03/06/02 41,410.44 NS~ OH AP00180485 007054 P~NATTOM CONSTRUCTION 03/06/02 19.72 MW OE AP00180486 000818 PAP~GON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 03/06/02 50.86 ~5~ OH AP00180487 004529 PARSAC 03/06/02 553.00 MW OH AP00180488 004656 PEREZ, HECTOR 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH AP00180489 007055 PERRY, FORREST 03/06/02 62.00 ~ OS AP00180490 006206 PI~NNING CENTER, THE 03/06/02 3,102.02 ~5~ OH AP00180491 000791 PMI 03/06/02 1,180.44 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180492 000758 PR~XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 03/06/02 58.59 MW OH AP00180493 003286 PRINCIPAL LIFE 03/06/02 81,133.72 ~ OH AP00180494 000251 R ~ R AUTOMOTIVE 03/06/02 316.31 MW OH AP00180495 005876 P~%DULESCU, DAN 03/06/02 140.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180496 007016 P~AINING ROSE INC 03/06/02 315.01 ~ OH AP00180497 000264 R3%LPHS GROCERY COMPLY 03/06/02 98.72 ~ OH AP00180498 000070 P~%NCHO CUC~4ONOA C~L%MBER OF C 03/06/02 100.00 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180499 SPD PJ~NCHO CUC~%MONGA POLICE DEPT 03/06/02 154.14 MW' OH AP00180500 000443 P~qI CONSULTING 03/06/02 1,024.00 ~5~ OH AP00180501 006979 ROSSI, RENZO 03/06/02 100.00 ~ OE AP00180502 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMP~NIES INC 03/06/02 340.00 ~5~ OH AP00180503 004628 S R CONSULT~qTS 03/06/02 80,375.00 ~K~ OH AP00180504 000305 S3~N BEP~N COL~Ty FLOOD CON=fROL 03/06/02 553.40 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180505 000300 SAN BEP~N CO~TY 03/06/02 3,560.00 ~4 OH AP00180506 000446 SM BERN CO%~gTY 03/06/02 12,093.18 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DE CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E O I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180507 000261 SAN BERN COb/~TY 03/06/02 45,982.49 ~W OH AP00180508 000150 SAN BER/~ COUNTY 03/06/02 30,027.23 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180509 001089 SA/~ BERNARDINO, CITY OF 03/06/02 1,170.00 MW OH AP00180510 006604 SCHNEIDER, DA/~IEL 03/06/02 55.12 MW OH AP00180911 004980 SCIORTINO, NICOLAS 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH AP00180512 005627 SCOTT, KATHy 03/06/02 72.95 MW OH AP00180513 003896 SENECHAL, CAL 03/06/02 346.50 MW OH AP00180514 006252 SIERRA SPRINGS 03/06/02 132.00 MW OH AP00180515 001327 SMART ~ FINAL 03/06/02 487.47 MW OH AP00180516 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 03/06/02 797.12 MW OH AP00180517 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180518 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH . Void AP00180519 VOID.CON~EINU Void - Continued Stub 03/06/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00180520 001432 SOUTHEP~N CALIFORNIA EDISON 03/06/02 60,548.06 MW OH AP00180521 000745 SOUTHWEST CONCRETE PRODUCTS 03/06/02 86.60 MW OH AP00180522 005722 SPECTRA COMPD~NY 03/06/02 1,669.00 MW OH AP00180523 007039 STA~HE, ROXA/qNE 03/06/02 110.00 MW OH AP00180524 007040 STARK, RITA 03/06/02 36.00 MW OH AP00180525 005144 STATE NET 03/06/02 275.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180526 003017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 03/06/02 1,687.00 MW OH AP00180527 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 03/06/02 5,721.57 MW OH AP00180528 006355 SUNGARD BI TECN INC 03/06/02 3,600.00 MW OH AP00180529 002344 TARGET 03/06/02 256.40 MW OH AP00180530 007041 TATUM, LATOYA 03/06/02 50.00 MW OH AP00180531 003942 TERMINIX INTER/~ATIONAL 03/06/02 554.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~aount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00180932 003204 TOGO'S 03/06/02 54.29 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180533 003388 TRUGREEN LD=NDCARE REGIONAL 03/06/02 31,714.00 ~5~ OH AP00180534 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 03/06/02 2,401.00 MW OH AP00180535 004788 UNDERGROb-ND SVC ALERT OF SO C 03/06/02 287.50 ~ OH AP00180536 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 03/06/02 116.15 MW OH AP00180537 012198 VALLE, CAROLYN 03/06/02 40.00 MW OH AP00180538 004623 VASQUEZ SR, RUBEN 03/06/02 100.00 MW OH AP00180539 000358 VEND U VENDING 03/06/02 78.86 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180540 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 03/06/02 540.24 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00180541 003742 VIGIIJ%NCE, TEP~RENCE 03/06/02 120.00 MW OH AP00180542 006616 VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI 03/06/02 28.47 MW OH AP00180543 001103 VISTA PAINT 03/06/02 104.13 ~ OH AP00180544 004002 WASTE MA/qAGEMENT 03/06/02 228.49 MW OR AP00180545 000213 WA2fIE 03/06/02 3,264.49 MW OH AP00180546 001522 WE TIP 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH AP00180547 007042 WELLS, NIKKI 03/06/02 55.00 MW OH AP00180548 002681 WILLI~%MS, DIANE 03/06/02 100.00 ~ OH AP00180549 006960 WINDSHIELDS OF CUC/~4ONGA 03/06/02 193.25 MW OH AP00180550 006118 WORLD BOOK SCHOOL Di~D LIBRARY 03/06/02 1,717.85 MW OR AP00180551 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 03/06/02 2,095.10 MW OH AP00180552 004624 YEE, LARRY 03/06/02 76.00 MW OH AP00180553 004955 ZWISSLER, JAJ~ES 03/06/02 70.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 03/06/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 10 WED, MAR 06, 2002, 4:51 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND/qCE---job: 78169 #S057 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 7 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 754,695.63 Number of Checks Processed: 215 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T 0 T A L 754,695.63 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 28, 2002 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Porl/olio Term Maturity 360 Equiv, 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 31,363,823.79 31,363,823.79 31,363,823.79 22.42 I 1 2.926 2.967 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,515,638 72 1,515,000.00 1.08 180 88 1.950 1.977 Federal Agency Issues ~ Coupon 107,100,(300.00 108,806,291,28 107,041,181.25 76.50 1,659 1,204 5.499 5.575 Investments 139,978,823.79 141,685,753.79 139,920,005.04 100.00% 1,271 922 4.884 4.98? Cash Passbook/Checking 1,402,427.25 1,402,427.25 1,402,427.25 I 1 0.493 0.500 (r~ot included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 141,381,251.04 143,088,181.04 141,322,432.29 1,271 922 4.884 a o;~ Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 582,361.75 4,802,388.96 Average Daily Balance 140,903,819.00 134,511,122.59 Effective Rate of Return 5.39% 5.36% I cadity that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official investment Policy. The provisions of the individual pond documents Portfolio CiTY CP un Oate: 03/12/2002.13:59 PM VS.02f (PRF_PM1) SymRept City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page2 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2002 Average Purchase Stated YTM Dayst~ Maturity CUSIP Investment ii Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value B=ok Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 31,363,823.79 31,363,823.79 31,363,823.79 2.967 2.926 1 Subtotal and Average 27,120,966.65 31,363~}23.79 31,363,823.79 31,363,823.79 2.926 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0E050EB38 1116 BANK OF AMERICA 11/29/2001 1,515,000.00 1,515,638.72 1,515,000.00 1.950 1.950 88 05/28/2002 Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,638.72 1,515,600.(]0 1.950 88 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/'27/1997 2,000,000.00 2,006,625.98 2,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 26 05/27/2002 31331RDX0 00996 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 2,CO0,000.00 2,031,953.74 1,999,375.00 6.240 6.162 138 07/17/2002 3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/05/1998 2,000,000.00 2,067,735.90 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 311 01/06/2003 31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,060,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.730 5.652 1,060 01/24/2005 31331LHD3 1100 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00 1,991,250.00 5.600 5.624 1,536 05/15/2006 31331LKE7 1107 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06~14/2001 3,000,000.00 3,030.937.50 2,997,000.00 5.560 5.512 1,201 06/14/2005 31331LMP0 1109 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/18/2001 2,000,00000 2,628,125.00 1,997,812.50 5.750 5.696 1,600 07/15/2006 31331LSG4 1112 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/29/2001 5,000,000.00 4,996,875~00 5,000,000.00 4.125 4.068 1,155 04/29/2005 31331LT61 1115 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/28/2001 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 1,368 11/28/2005 31331LB23 1120 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02~)1/2C~2 3,000,000.00 3,000,937.50 3,000,000.00 4.600 4.537 1,433 02~)1/20~6 3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/06/1998 1,000,000.00 1,033,437.50 1,000,0CO.00 6.230 6.145 311 01/06/2003 3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 2,080,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.530 5.454 647 12/08/2003 3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1~9g 1,000,000.00 1,040,937.50 1,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 691 01/21/2004 3133M86L3 01043 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/20/1999 3,000,0~0.00 3,062,812.50 3,000,000.00 5.755 5.676 206 09/20/2002 3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,176,250.00 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 839 06/17/2004 3133Mg6K3 01053 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/1999 2,000,000.00 2,029,375.00 1,996,875.00 6.480 6.428 850 06~5/2004 3133MSHV2 1062 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05~5/2000 2,000,000.00 2,025,000.00 1,994,375.00 7.890 7.850 1,172 05/15/2005 3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,091,875.00 2,997,187.50 5.760 5.707 1,060 01/24/2005 3133MFBP2 1103 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05~30/2001 2,000,000.00 21063,750.00 1,999,062.50 5.800 5.731 1,551 05~0/2006 3133MF7E2 1105 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/06/2001 2,000,000.00 2,063,750.00 2,000,000.00 5.750 5671 1,558 06/06/2006 3133MGBV7 1110 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,029,375.00 1,999,375.00 5.800 5.728 1,606 07/24/2006 3133MJL81 1114 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/20/2001 3,100,000.00 3,102,906.25 3,098,450.00 4.250 4.207 1,176 05/20/2005 3133MKU88 1117 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/15/2002 2,000,000.00 2,007,500.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,232 07/15/2005 312923MO5 10~1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 00/20/2001 1 ,O00,000.OO 1,022,890.93 1,000,000.00 5.625 5.548 1,480 03/20/2006 312923MJ1 1082 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 00/21/2001 4,000,000.00 4,007,467.65 4,000,000.00 5.700 5.622 1,481 03/21/2006 312923SM8 1066 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/10/2001 4,000,000.00 4,0~4,091.80 4,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 1,501 04/10/2006 312923ZB4 1096 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/08/2001 6,000,000.00 6,098,777.16 6,000,CO0.CO 5.520 5.444 1,52g 05/08/2006 312923ZY4 1098 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/09/2001 5,000,000.00 5,031,354.53 5,000,000.00 5.700 5.622 1,530 05~9/2006 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2002 Average Purchase Stated Y'rM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Market Value Book Value Rats Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 312924SH7 1113 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/14/2001 3,000,000.00 2,963,900.76 2,997,187.50 4.150 4.118 1,354 11/14/2005 3129242D4 1119 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/06/2002 3,000.000.00 3,010,454.87 3,000.(X)0.00 4~750 4.685 1,438 02/06/2006 31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,086,881.71 2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 444 05/19/2003 31364KPT1 1065 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/06/2000 3,000,000.00 3,046,87500 3,000,000.00 7.875 7.767 1,193 06/06/2005 31364KR36 1077 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/05/2001 4,000,000.00 4,062.5~0.00 3,999,375.00 5,625 5.553 888 08~5/2004 3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04/2001 4,000,000.00 4,111,250.00 3,994,375.00 5.300 5.259 1,489 3136FODW9 1088 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/11/2001 2,000,000.00 2,008,125.00 2,0CO,000.00 5.650 5.573 1,502 04/11/20~6 3136FOEV0 1091 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 2,0~0,000.00 2,010,000.00 1,999,200.00 5.750 5.~80 1,508 04/17/2006 3136FOEW8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 3,CX]0,0O0.00 3,083,437.50 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,508 04/17/2006 3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.~O 2,080,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,545 05/24/2006 3136FORV6 1108 FEDERAL NATL M'r'G ASSN 07/18/2001 2,000,000.CO 2,025,625.00 1,998,750.00 5.750 5.685 1,587 07/05/2006 3136F1FF2 1118 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 01/23/2002 2,000,000.00 2,025,625.00 2,000,00000 5,000 4.932 1,424 01/23/2006 Subtotal and Average 110,326,627.68 107.100,000.00 108,866,291.28 107,041,181.25 5.499 1,204 Total Investments and Average 138,962,594.33 139,978,823.79 141,685,753.79 139,920,005.04 4.884 9~2 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 2002 A~erage Purchase Stated Y'I'M Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Cash Accounts 00180 BANK OF AM;RICA 1,402,427.25 1,4~2,427.25 1,402~427.25 0.~00 0.493 1 Cash Subtotal and Average Balance 1,941,224.67 1,402,427.25 1,402,427.25 1,402,427.25 1 Total Cash and Investments 140,903,819.00 141,381,251.04 143,088,181.04 141 ~t22,432.29 4.884 922 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 5 Investment Activity By Type February 1, 2002 through February 28, 2002 Beginning St~ed Transaction Purchases Sales/MbturlUes Ending CUSIP In~mstment # Issuer Balance Rata Data or Depo~lta or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.967 9,700,000.00 7,500,000.00 Subtotal 29,163,823.79 9,700,0~0.00 7,500,000.00 31,363,823.79 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (MonthlySummar~) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 0.Go 558,752.88 Subtotal 1,961,180.13 0.00 558,752.88 1,402,427.25 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. ~ Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331LB23 1120 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.600 02/01/2002 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133MARK7 1059 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 7.000 02/25/2002 0.O0 1 ,~99,687.50 312923GH2 1078 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 6.000 02/14/2002 0.O0 2,000,000.00 312924204 1119 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.750 02/06/2002 3,000,000.00 0.00 31359MGV9 1079 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 5.450 02/12/2002 0.00 3,000,000.00 Subtotal 10~,040,868.75 6,060,000.00 6,999,687.50 107,041,181.25 Total 140,680,872.67 15,700,000.00 15, ~------------------~ 8,440.38 141,322,432.29 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended January 31, 2002 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavina A~3ent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank tmprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.60% $ 257,311.00 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.78 Reserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.60% 242,520.00 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasu~j Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.60% 6,448.00 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.67 $ 506,280.45 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds sedes US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.60% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.04 1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Rasrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.60% 583,248.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.18 Sr. Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 NIA* 1.60% 1,095,702.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.50 Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.60% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 1.60% 160.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.30 Residual Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.60% 216,749.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.71 $ 1,895,860.73 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,402,14t.18 Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquida~l upon demand. ~ i:lfinance~Cash with Fiscal Agents.xl$ 2/1972002 4:24 PM R A N H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I I~1 E E R I N G. D E P A R TM E N T Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Superintendent SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR COYOTE CANYON LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1120305- 5650/1116-120-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvements and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project will add landscape improvements to the southern border of the Park. Due to irrigation inefficiencies, foot traffic from the adjacent housing and heavy shade, pa. st plantings have not thrived. The new design addresses these issues and will provide a pleasing landscape, which compliments the existing surroundings. This project was carried-over from the previous year in order to have landscape and irrigation design corrections made to the original drawings. The architect has completed the design corrections and Staff has approved the plans and specifications. Engineer's estimate for this project is $80,000. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JB:ju 2? RESOLUTION NO. 0 7.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COYOTE CANYON LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvements". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON APRIL 16, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for "Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvements" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BID FOR COYOTE CANYON LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS". Please purchase and/or direct requests for plans and specs regarding the "Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvements" project to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Counter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cueamonga, California, 91730-3801. A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at Coyote Canyon Park, 10987 Terra Vista Parkway, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders r~ay present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be Resolution No. Page 2 documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work ora similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. Page 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "Class B" (General Building Contractor). In accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. Page 4 the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and roles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right tn reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for COYOTE CANYON LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS may be directed to: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent 9153 Ninth Street Rancho Cncamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4180 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of March 2002. ADVERTISE ON: March 26, 2002 and April 2, 2002 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator 00~ SUBJECT: Destruction of City Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction request have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representative, the Department Head and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Planning Requestor: Brad Buller Date: Febma_n/12,2002 I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center so are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage-generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fi.om Records Retention Records / Documents (lVlo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 2030.4 - Community Dev. Block Grants All that were expired/completed/terminated prior to 1/1/1997 4020.5 - Grants (other than CDBG) All that became inactive prior to 1/1/1997 Depa~nt A~ City Attorney Approvld (if required) J Signa~,~ V Date fSignature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date RESOLUTION NO. 02-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the Planning Department have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 02-*** Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of March, 2002. Executed this 21st day of March, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk THE CITY OF I2ANCHO ClICA~IONGA DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Christina Wilson, Planning Aide SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2002-00128 - COSTCO WHOLESALE - CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY (PCN) FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 21 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE, FOR OFF-PREMISE LIQUOR SALES AT A PROPOSED COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE, IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED AT 11800 4TH STREET (ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET ADJACENT TO THE 1-15 FREEWAY): APN: 229-263-69 RECOMMENDATION Approve the determination of the "Public Convenience or Necessity" through the adoption of the attached Resolution and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. ANALYSIS A. Back.qround: In the Summer of 2000, Costco Wholesale applied for a Conditional Use Permit (DRCCUP00-34) to relocate their current business operations from Foothill Boulevard, (just east of the 1-15 Freeway), to the north side of 4th Street, (just west of the 1-15 Freeway). Their application was formally approved by the Planning Commission on March 28th, 2001, and to date the construction on the shell of the new facility is almost complete. Because the Census Tract (21.0) to which they are relocating is currently over its Alcoholic Beverage Control established limit of nineteen (19) liquor licenses, Costco Wholesale must first be granted a letter of Public Convenience Or Necessity by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to obtain a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage License. B. Requirements from Department of Alcohol Beveraqe Control: The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the different types of licenses in each Census Tract. The limits ara calculated from the ratio of liquor licenses to the population of the Census Tract. According to the Alcohol Beverage Control staff, there are nineteen (19) licenses allowed within Census Tract 21.0, twenty-five (25) currently existing, and four (4) applications pending. When a Census Tract limit has been reached, additional liquor licenses can be issued only if the City determines that the license would serve the public's convenience or necessity as required by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Council, has the greatest latitude, based on local conditions and determinations. CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00128 - COSTCO WHOLESALE MARCH 20, 2002 Page 2 C. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: The following are facts that support the requested "Public Convenience or Necessity:" 1. The site is located directly adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway and 4th Street, a major thoroughfare. 2. The site is not located close to sensitive users such as day care facilities, elementary schools or high schools. No comments have been received from the Police Department, and the site is not located in a high crime area. 3. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south consists of the Ontario Mills commercial/entertainment center in the City of Ontario, the property to the east is the 1-15 Freeway, and the property to the west is currently under construction. 4. The site is zoned for and the applicant has obtained a Conditional Use Permit for this type of wholesale/retail discount store including the off-premise sale of liquor. 5. Rancho Cucamonga residents currently do not have another business of a wholesale nature in the immediate area, and would be afforded more shopping opportunities for personal and convenience items and services. CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds the issuance of a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage License for Off-Premise Liquor sales would not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution. City Planner BB:CW/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated February 20, 2002 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Census Tract and Location Map Draft Resolution of Approval 0350 Santa Monlca Blvd.. Ste. 220. Los Anffeles. CA 90025 Telephone: g00-222-5777 Fax: 310-$53-309~ Wednesday, February 20, 2002 City of Rancho Cucamonga Con~mmity Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Costco Wholesale Corporation - 11800 4t~ Street, Rancho Cucanaonga, California 91739 To Whom It May Concern: Costco Wholesale Corporation recently has reade application with the state for a type 21 Liquor · license. This application is pending the approval of Public Convenience & Necessity by the local governing body. Enclosed you will find documentation for the finding of PCN by the city and a check for the mount of $315.00. If you have any further questions or need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at: 1-800-222-5777 ext. 19. All of your help is appreciated and please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. itot License Specialists Cig, OF RANCHo COCAI,tONGA RECEIVED. PLANNIIIIEi STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) - I certify that I know Or have satisfactory evidence that RICHARD J. OLIN is the person who appeared before me and is a Vice President/Assistant Secretary of Costco Wholesale Corporation, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~ ~.,~y_.. .......... :¢' °... Notary Public, in and for th ..--..~-'... ~,~o~ ~ -.:~ -. ~ .~**: 07,~ ~ Washington, residing at Renton My commission expires 02/19/05 PROJECT DATA REGIONAE MAP VICINI~ MAP ~Z~~~ ~ ....... ~: ,' ....... ~0,01 21:0 RESOLUTION NO. O~ - (~ "7,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 21 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR OFF PREMISE LIQUOR SALES AT A PROPOSED COSTCO WHOLESALE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED AT 11800 4TH STREET (ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET ADJACENT TO THE 1-15) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 229- 263-69. A. Recitals. 1. Costco Wholesale filed an application for a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage License for off- premise liquor sales from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 20th day of Mamh 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on March 20, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The location is directly adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway on 4th Street, and is suited for this type of business. b. The site is not close to sensitive users such as elementary and high schools. No comments have been received from the Police Department, and the site is not located in a high crime area. c. Rancho Cucamonga residents currently do not have another business of a wholesale nature in the immediate area, and would be afforded more shopping opportunities for personal and convenience items and services. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council concludes that the off-premise sale of liquor will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this council hereby determines that the issuance of a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage License for Off- Premise liquor sales at Costco Wholesale would serve public convenience or necessity. 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ N G I N E l~l~l N G Dl~ PAl~ TH g NT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the application for the California Beverage Container Recycling and Liter Reduction Annual Payment by the California Department of Conservation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 14581(a)(4)A) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling (Division) is required to distribute total of $10,5000,000 to eligible cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities. Each city may receive a minimum of $5,000 or an amount calculated by the Division, per capita based, whichever is greater. The per capita amount calculated by the Division, is based upon the population of the incorporated areas of the city, as stated in the Annual Demographic Report submitted to the Governor by the Department of Finance. The eligible participant must provide a description of an activity(les) that meet one or more of the following criteria do: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RECYCLING AND/OR LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL GRANT March 20, 2002 Page 2 · The activity has a primary emphasis on collection and recycling of beverage containers at large venues, public areas, residential communities or schools; · The activity has a primary emphasis on public education promoting beverage container recycling and/or litter prevention; or · The activity has a primary emphasis on beverage container litter prevention and/or abatement in public places including community clean-up projects or related activities involving the recycling of beverage containers· The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been allocated $37,634 for FY 2002/2003 and $37,634 for FY 2003/2004 to do programs related to "Recycling and/or Litter Reduction Activities". We are proposing the following for these funds. · Purchase recycling bins for parks and facilities that have vending machines and/or snack bar that sell beverage containers. · We will use some of the funds to do public education on cable and in the newspaper with emphasis on recycling beverage containers in the recycle bin(s) at the curb or at city parks and facilities. · Work on school programs to get as many schools as we can. We are also planning on doing school outreach through assemblies and poster contests. This would help to expand our recycling efforts. Respectfully submitted, Wiil~m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw Attachment /-/5 RESOLUTION NO. O 2 ~ O 7& A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIl, OF TI~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TI~ APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DMSION OF RECYCLING WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and fitter cleanup activities; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the program; and WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a) (4)(E) of the California Beverage Container and Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the due date and time in order to request funds f~om the Department of Conservatinn's Division of Recycling. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request Form to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The City Engineer, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cueamonga all necessary forms hereto for the purposes of securing payments and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the Section 14581 (a) (4) (A) of the California Beverage Container and Litter Reduction Act and provide information regarding this program to the Division upon request. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate EngineerU~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR DESIGN OF THE ROCHESTER AVENUE LANDSCAPING AT ROUTE 30 PROJECT AND TO APPROPRIATE $24,332.00 ($22,120.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1103165650/1339110 (BEAUTIFICATION FUND) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $24,3320.00 from Account No. 1103165650/1339110 (Beautification Fund) for the design of Rochester Avenue landscaping at Route 30 Project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project is a combination of 2 separate projects. The first project involves the east side of Rochester Avenue north of the Route 30 Freeway. The second project is comprised of the west side of Rochester Avenue north of Route 30 Freeway and the east side of Rochester Avenue south of Highland Avenue. These projects were combined to ensure that the landscaping on both sides of Rochester Avenue north of Route 30 have a uniform appearance. Another reason is that it is cheaper to landscape one large combined project rather than landscape multiple small projects. As a background to the first project, the developers of Tract 13835 were required to install landscaping, irrigation and hardscape along east side of Rochester Avenue between the Route 30 Freeway and Vintage Drive as a condition of the development. At that time however, it was unknown how the Route 30 Freeway construction work would affect Rochester Avenue. As a result, the developer was permitted to deposit in-lieu fees to the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Rochester Avenue Landscaping at Route 30 Project March 20, 2002 Page 2 City. Now that the Route 30 Freeway at Rochester Avenue has been completed, the City now plans to install the landscaping, irrigation and hardscape. As a background to the second project, the Route 30 Freeway work lowered Rochester Avenue by 5 vertical feet and resulted in the destruction of the existing landscaping, irrigation systems and hardscape on the west side of Rochester Avenue north of Route 30 and the east side of Rochester Avenue south of Highland Avenue. San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has agreed to pay for the replacement of landscaping, irrigation and hardscape that were destroyed by the Route 30 Freeway work. The City has received and approved a proposal from the Architerra Design Group, Inc. to design the landscaping, irrigation and hardscape for the earlier mentioned portions of Rochester Avenue. The appropriation of $24,3320.00 from Account No. 1103165650/1339110 (Beautification Fund)would fund the Consultant's design work as part of CO 98-021. SANBAG will reimburse the City for SANBAG's share of the design work. That amount comes out to $12,826.00 ($11,660.00 plus 10% contingency). Respectfully submitted, ~. O'Nei~ City Engineer WJO:WS '~ ROUTE a0 ~ VINTAGE DR. HIGHLAND - AVE. SAN BERNARDINO ROCHESTER AVE. LANDSCAPING .. AT ROUTE 30 PROJECT title; Ct'o'"' M° %;"' A e.~--.~'-.'..;~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA B' . '""' ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION N ~-c~._.J~ VICINITY MAP page T H E C I T Y 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffRepor DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE KNUCKLE INTERSECTION OF MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET, V-183 - APN: 209-041-47 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of excess street right-of-way at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 00-61, a request for development of 49 senior apartments, on 1.31 acres of land in the High Residential District with Senior Housing Overlay District. One of the conditions for the approval of DR 00-61 is to vacate excess right-of-way along the project frontage with Malvern Avenue and Salina Street. The vacated excess right- of-way will be incorporated into the project and maintained by the property owner. On January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission determined that said vacation is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur. Respectfully submitted, VVilliam J. 0 Neil City Engineer W JO:MB:sc Attachment Vicinity Map - City of Rancho Cucamonga EXHIBIT RESOLUTION NO. (~) ~7~ - ~) "7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE KNUCKLE INTERSECTION OF MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Cod e, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess right-of-way at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street; and WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess right-of-way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating excess right-of-way at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B". SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. EXHIBIT "A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET TO BE VACATED That portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township I South, Range 7 West, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as shown on the map of Cncamon~ Lands recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of Tract No. 5347 as per map recorded in Book 66, Pages 11 and 12 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County with the southerly line of Salina Street, 60.00 feet wide; thence along said southerly line of Salina Street South 89°42'11" West 133.83 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 69 feet, said curve also being tangent to the westerly line of Malvem Avenue, 66.00 feet wide, as conveyed to the County of San Bemardino by deed recorded May 3, 1960, in Book 5127, Page 402 of Official Records of said County, said beginning of tangent curve'is the True Point of Beginning fbr this description; thence continuing along said southerly line of Salina Street South 89°42'11" West 69.20 feet to the intersection with the westerly line of said Malvern Avenue; thence along said westerly line of Malvem Avenue North 00o07'52" West 69.20 feet to the end of the above-mentioned curve having a radius of 69 feet; thence southerly, southeasterly and easterly along said curve through a central angle of 90°09'57", an arc length of 108.58 feet to the Tree Point of Beginning. Containing 1,029 square feet (0.024 acres) The above described real property is shown on exhibit "B" attached herewith and by this reference made a part here of. Prepared under my supervision. Lor~ C. ~hillips, Date PLS 3173 _._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION doc-01/07/02-26v I ' EXHIBIT "B" ~r/~ LOREN C. PH~LII~ ,,,~..o~- c~ 6' ~- N89'50'52~/ PL 129.84' -~, .~.~, 33' i-,m u' SCALE: 1 "=50' ' , R=69.00' b ~ , DELTA=90'09'57" TAN=69.20' 03(::) . ~ SALINA ~ ~ AREA TO o BE N89'4.2'11 "E ~ 69.20' ~ N89'42'1 I"E __ SOUTHRLY LINE OF ~ SAUNA STREET i TRUEPOINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF BEGINNING -- WESTERLY LINE TR. NO. 534-7- 19' SIDEWALK EASEMENT LOREN C. PHILLIPS, DATE (P~iva~.e) S89'42'59"E 332.91' LEGEND PREPARED BY DENOTES VACATION OF R-O-W BY C~TY TO OWNER. LOREN PHILMPS ~ ASSOCIATES ...... EASEMENT LINE 22652 GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. SUITE 250 I I DIAMOND' BAR, CA. 91765 I ~ (909) 396-9636 ZXHIBr[ MAP FOR I ~-'/..~.-~~ I .,G -or-wA VA O. J TH E C I T Y OF I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst II DATE: March 20, 2002 SUBJECT: Quarterly Newsletter Insert Design Contract RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council amend the Professional Services Agreement (CO 01-099) between the City and Geographics communications firm, and approve a budget appropriation of $15,000 to the Non-departmental General Overhead City Account #1001001-5300 for professional design services for the summer edition of the Rancho Cucamonga Reporter, quarterly newsletter insert in The Grapevine. ANALYSIS: As the City would like to add value to its current quarterly publication, The Grapevine, the creation of a more focused quarterly newsletter was undertaken as an integral part of our community information program. The pilot edition of the newsletter was published for Spring 2002, covering stories of core interest to the community, as well as useful City information for our residents. Staff continues to recommended Geographics to undertake the newsletter due to past successful use of this communications firm for the pilot edition and similar publications, such as the City's Annual Report and Redevelopment Agency's Vision's newsletter. Geographics has had experience in developing similar types of community information documents for a number of public agencies including the cities of Chino, Colton, Covina, Fontana, Fullerton, Glendale, Hesperia, Huntington Beach, Indio, Montclair, Moreno Valley, Norco, Riverside, and West Covina; as well as the County of San Bernardino. The cost of the summer edition is approximately $14,922 and includes design and coordination of copy writing, photography, layout, up to two rounds of revisions, prepress preparation, and insert printing of 55,000 copies. The recommended process and costs of the design services are similar to those used to produce the pilot edition of the Rancho Cucamonga Reporter and the FY 2000-2001 Annual Report, Respectfully submitted, Management Analyst II City Manager's Office R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I~NGINI~I~DIN~ D ~ P^I~T~I[N~f StaffR ort DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP 15666, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WESTERN LA'ID PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 15666 and accepting the monumentation cash deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 15666, located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Milliken Avenue, in the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2001. This project is for the subdivision into 2 parcels on 2.35 acres of land. The Developer, Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership, is submitting a monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the setting of the monuments in the following amounts: Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,500.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPQRT PARCEL MAP 15666 March 20, 2002 Page 2 The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments / II ~1 II N CITY OF IT~M:~~~~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr~.~.:~ ENGIN~.k'~tING DIVISION ~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.. ENGINEERING DIVISION OFFICIAL RECEIPT · 'i 13650 / ~ i'/ PHONE: ENGINEERING FEES: Plan Check Public Work Inspection Fee map Contract Bid Document street Overload/Wideload Permit storm drain Standard Drawings legal description Bid Packet hydrology landscape misc Lot Line Adjustment _ TRUSTS (Refundable): Tentative Parcel Map -"g,~=a~"Monumentation Initial Study 70-404 St Improvement Attach estimate Parcel Map 70-405 Constr Permit Tentative Map Ext 70-438 Maintenance Improv Agree Ext Retention Basin Merger 70-276426 Public Works Street Vacation Reapportionment 33-3901-8520 TOTAL AD (Copy to Assess Revenue) IN-LIEU FEES: Location Amount ~Median Island 79 92.5 9~77 Utili~ Undergrounding r ~3901-7250 St Light Energy Deposit Miscellaneous Comments: ENGINEERING FEES: Plan Check Public Work Inspection Fee map Conlxact Bid Document street Overload/Wideload Permit storm drain Standard Drawings legal description Bid Packet hydrology landscape misc Lot Line Adjustment . TRUSTS(Refundable): Tentative Parcel Map - ~4tag4l~'Monumentation Initial Study 70-404 St Improvement ARach estimate Parcel Map 70-405 Constr Permit Tentative Map Ext 70-438 Maintenance Improv Agree Ext Retention Basin Merger 70-276-426 Public Works /~6~/" ~;~g~ati°n ,~, gd) O T Inspect Deposit Reapportionment 33-3901-8520 TOTAL AD (Copy to Assess Revenue) t/ 1N-LIEU FEES: Location Amount -, ......... Utility Undergrounding __-3901-7250 St Light Energy Deposit Miscellaneous Comments: CITy OV m,,NCHO CVCA~ON(;. 'I 3 6 5 0 ~ ENGINEE~NG DIVISION OFFIC~L ~CEIPT PHONE: ENGINEERING FEES: Plan Check Public Work Inspection Fee map Contxact Bid Document street Overload/Wideload Permit storm drain Standard Drawings legal description Bid Packet hydrology landscape misc Lot Line Adjustment TRUSTS (RefundabLe): Tentative Parcel Map - '"4~=~9~Monumentation Initial Study 70-404 St Improvement Atlach estimate Parcel Map 70-405 Constr Permit Tentative Map Ext 70-438 Maintenance Improv Agree Ext Retention Basin Merger 70-276-426 Public Works Stre~et Vacation · O T Inspect Deposit Reapportionment 33-3901-8520 TOTAL AD (Copy to Assess Revenue) IN-LIEU FEES: Location Amount Median Island ..... 6 0~,77 Utility Undergrounding __-3901-7250 St Light Energy Deposit Miscellaneous Comments: ~Z RESOLUTION NO. O.~ - ~ 7 g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15666 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15666, submitted by Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership, and consisting of a subdivision of 2.35 acres of land into 2 parcels, located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Milliken Avenue in the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Community Plan was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August g, 2001; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15666 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Monumentation Cash Deposit by Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved; and that said Parcel Map No. 15666 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. R a N C H O C U C a M O N G a E NGINI~I~DING DEPAI~T~I~NT SlaffRewrt DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14494-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN THE SCE CORRIDOR AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMI'UFED BY US HOME CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14494-1 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14494-1 is located on the north side of Banyan Street between the SCE Corridor and Day Creek Boulevard, excluding a not-a-part parcel owned by others (Intex) at the northwest corner of Day Creek/Banyan Street intersection. Tract 14494-1 is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the whole development. Tract 14494-1 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 18 acres into 63 lots. The Developer, US Home Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $515,900.00 Labor and Material Bond: $257,950.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 5,550.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 14494-1 US HOME CORPORATION March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:sc Attachments BOUNDARY OF ANN[XATION NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract /qt./gq_/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tn'LE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity M~p~ RESOLUTION NO. 0 ~ - 0 7q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14494-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14494, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated, as part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 63 lots located on the north side Banyan Street between the SCE Corridor and Day Creek Boulevard, was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No.14494-1 is the first of two final maps of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by US Home Corporation as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14494-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14494-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREASi notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Tendtory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14494-1 - US HOME CORPORATION March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: US HOME CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: See Attached Exhibit "A-8" and "B-8" A- 1 TR 14494-1 70 EXHIBIT "A-8" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 8 THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B. & M., IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89°25'52" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 240.01 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 240.00 FEET OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE NORTH 00°23'58" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID WEST HALF, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00"23'58" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 915.68 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 89~24'03" WEST, 1077.59 FEET, TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'31" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 623.05 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 89"25'38' WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 658.22 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00"20'45" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 292.08 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE NORTH 89°25'52" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 417.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 18.21 AC RES. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B-$" ATTACHED HEREVVITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. EXHIBIT 'B-8' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 {NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 14494-1 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # I 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD #7 +24 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B - 1 TR 14497 7_5 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 ,~nd I l~e I Init Tyne t )'nitn 1 lnitn Faetnr I lnitn I Init R evemm Single Family Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Family Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14494-1) is: 50 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $888.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l ~and t lse I Init Tyne l lnlt~ I Jnit~ gnatnr l lnlt~ [ lnlt Revenue Single Family Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 I 0 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14494-1) is: 50 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,666.00 Annual Assessment C - 1 TR 14494-1 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Slaff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14497, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLUEGRASS AVENUE BETWEEN BANYAN STREET AND WILSON AVENUE, SUBMI'I-]'ED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14497 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKG ROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14497, located on the west side of Bluegrass Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement Dated November 29, 2000 for the whole development. Tract 14497 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 21 acres into 73 lots. The Developer, Standard Pacific Corp., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts~-- Faithful Performance Bond $848,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $424,300.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 6,050.00 7S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 14497 - STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments ,., BOUNDARY OF ANNE')CATION NORTH ~'~ NTS CITY OF rrEM: Tract RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGiNEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity M.~ RESOLUTION NO. 0,~ -~) ~.t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14497, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14497, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 73 lots located on the west side Bluegrass Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No.14497 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific Corp. as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14497 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. O ~ - 0 7Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERINO THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14497 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID') establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, a!l of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14497 - STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Standard Pacific Corp. The legal description of the Property is: See attached Exhibit "A" on sheet A-2. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereofi A-1 TR14497 <~l EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION TO LIGHTING DISTRICT (FUTURE TRACT 14497) THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 6 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 518 RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020045227 ON JANUARY 30, 2002, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE GENERAL NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6 AS HAVING A BEARING AND A DISTANCE OF "SOUTH 89°24'(~3" EAST 294.89 FEET"; THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 142.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 149.16 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE FROM SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 01°47'07" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'17'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 4.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°55'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 39.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 150.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88036'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°31'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 84.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.08 FEET; THENCE NORT~ 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57'. WEST, A DISTANCE OF 255.02 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89°42'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 372.65 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 6. CONTAINING 20.84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ~ PREPARED UNDER THE S~RVISION OF: GARY W. DO)~ICH, P.L.S, 4693 'DATE/ LICENSE EXPIRES 9-30-2003 [xp. 9-30-03 G:\525\101LEGALS~14497.DOC ~/I~J~FI~C~ o BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: lract I~ ~NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENG~EE~GDIVISION ~. ~ EX.BIT: Vicinity~a~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with 'the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 14497 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD #7 +30 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B-I TR 14497 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Thc rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. Thc following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 ~and 1 l~e I Init Tyne I lnit~ I lnit~ gaetnr 1 )'nits t Init Revenue Single Family Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14497) is: 50 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $888.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I .and 1 l~e ! Init Tyne { lnit~ ! lnit~ Faetnr l Jnits I Init Revenue Single Family Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14497) is: 50 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,666.00 Annual Assessment C-1 TR 14497 ~5 R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14498, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND BLUEGRASS AVENUE, SUBMI'I-rED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14498 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14498, located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Blue Grass Avenue, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement Dated November 29, 2000 for the whole development. Tract 14498 is.a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 17 acres into 50 lots. The homebuilder, Standard Pacific Corp., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $687,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $343.650.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,900.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 14498- RANCHO ETIWANDA 785, LLC. March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer and owner, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION CITY OF rr[~M: Tract RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI*L[~: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. 0~'-~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14498, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14498, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 50 lots located on the southwest comer of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14498 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific Corp. as builder; and WHEREAS, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, as Developer, submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14498 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. Oo~ - ~ ~/7/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTA1N TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14498 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID') establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to few assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the lew of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly ~vaived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14498 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Temtory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC The legal description of the Property is: See attached Exhibit "A" on sheet A-2. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A- I TR 14498 qz EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION TO LIGHTING DISTRICT (FUTURE TRACT 14498) THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 5 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 518 RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020045227 ON JANUARY 30, 2002, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY TERMINU~ OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE GENERAL SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID pARCEL 5 AS HAVING A BEARING AND A DISTANCE OF "SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST 294.89 FEET"; THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 219.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00'35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A'DISTANCE OF 52.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57.. EAST, A DISTANCE OF 355.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 324.65 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 5. CONTAINING 16.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LICENSE EXPIRES 9-30-2003 L.S. 4695 Exp, 9-30-03 q BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH 1~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: lract I~ ~NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLe: Rancho Etiwanda ENG~EE~G DIVISION EX.BIT: Vicinity ~ap/ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 14498 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD #7 +30 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B - 1 TR 14498 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I .and 1 l~e ! Init Tyne l lnit~ ! lDit~ Factor 1 lnit~ 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Family Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commemial Acm 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14498) is: 50 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $888.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I .and 1 l~e 1 lnlt Tyne t lnits 1 lnit~ Factor l lnlts l lnlt Revenue Single Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Family Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14498) is: 50 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,666.00 Annual Assessment C-1 TR 14498 R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A E NGINEER~NG DEPARTIflENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14523-1, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BANYAN STREET AND WILSON AVENUE, SUBMI'I-FED BY MBK HOMES LTD. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14523 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14523, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the whole development. Tract 14523 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 14 acres into 48 lots. The homebuilder, MBK Homes LTD, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $478,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: $239,200.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,850.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 14523 - MBK HOMES LTD March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Will~im J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:sc Attachments BOUNOARY OF ANNE'XATION NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF I~r[~M: Tract I~/.~.~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~rIT[U: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity 1Vl_~p~ RESOLUTION NO. (~)~ - O (~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14523, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14523, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 48 lettered and I numbered lots located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Street, was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14523 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by MBK Homes LTD as developer; and WHEREAS, aforesaid Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14523 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. /Ob RESOLUTION NO. 00~ - ~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14523 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14523 - MBK HOMES LTD March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Ten'itory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Ter(.itory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. /OX Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: MBK HOMES LTD The legal description of the Property is: See Attached Exhibits "A-4" and "B-4/7". A-I TR 14523 /~)~_~ EXHIBIT "A-4" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 4 THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S. BB. & M, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89024'03" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 240.04 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 240.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00°23'58" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 821.12 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 89*24'03" EAST, 479.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00035'57" EAST, 7.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89024'03" EAST, 253.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°19'43" EAST, 70.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89024'03'. EAST, 276.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'31'' EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 590.63 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 89°24'03'' WEST, 193.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°55'03" WEST, 83.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°22'15" WEST, 83~01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89024"03" WEST, 189.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89024'03" WEST, 529.46 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 240.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 00023'58" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 582.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 14.48 ACRES. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B~/7" ATFACHED HEREWITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING EXP. 06130104 P' EXHIBIT "B-4/7' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL O£SCRIPTION ~ 2O 19 1 ~..~.o~t so fY;/'°''' I I 14.47 ~-~ N~22'15~ ~.0~' ~.25' P~7 ~ I ~9'24'03~ ~P~ 7 SCALE: 1"=300' Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. Thc sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 14523 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # I 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD #7 +18 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B- 1 TR 14523 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I ,and 11~e l Init Tyne l lnlt~ I Tnit~ Factor 11nlt~ 1 Init Revenn¢ Single Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Family Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14523) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $422.25 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I .and 1 ]~e I Init Tyne I lnit~ 1 lnits Factnr [/nits Il'nit Revenn¢ Single Family Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Comm/lnd Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14523) is: 25 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $833.00 Annual Assessment C- 1 TR 14523 /07 R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA ENGINEERING D E PART,lENT SlaffReport DATE: March 20, 2002 T~ Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14523-1, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14523-1 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14523-1, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the whole development. Tract 14523-1 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 7 acres into 25 lots. The homebuilder, US Home Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond. $172,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 86,100.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 3,700.00 CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 14523-1 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer and Owner, Rancho Etiwanda 685 LLC, are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William O. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:sc Attachments BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract Iq5~$- I RANCHO CUCAMONGA T[TL[~: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. 0 6~ -- 0 ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14523-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14523, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated, as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 25 numbered and lettered lots located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14523-1 is the first of two final maps of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by US Home Corporation as builder; and WHEREAS, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC as Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14523-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. Od- 098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT 14523-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions ofAxticle 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and I/2, RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14523-1 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy ofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. /13 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner o£the Property is: RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC The legal description of the Property is: See Attached Exhibits "A-7" and "B-4/7" A-I TR 14523-1 EXHIBIT "A-7" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 7 THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S. BB. & M, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 240.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 240.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00~23'58~ EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 1701.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, 1077.59 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE NORTH 00°17'31'. WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 299.41 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 89°24'03' WEST, 193.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°55'03.. WEST, 83.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°22'15" WEST, $3.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24~03" WEST, 189.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03. WEST, 529.46 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 240.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00°23'58'. EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 297.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 7.44 ACRES. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B-4f'/" AI-i'ACHED HEREVVITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING MARK WARE, PLS 5820 ' DATE EXP. 06~30~04 Z.. //5 EXHIBIT 'B-4/7' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION I so r',(; I L~ PARCEL 4 5820 I P~4 N~'24'OJ~ P~7 SCALE: 1 "=500' //C Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 14523-1 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 67* 22* SLD #7 11' SLD #7 +9 * Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B- 1 TR 14523-1 //7 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Thc rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I ~and l I~e I Init Tyne I lnit~ 1 lnits Factnr 1 lnits 1 Init revemm Single Family Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14523-1) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $422.25 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l ,and 1 l~e ! Init Tyne l lnits 1 lnits Factnr [ ~nits I ~nit Revenue Single Family Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14523-1) is: 25 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $833.00 Annual Assessment C-1 TR 14523~1 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTiViE N T Stllff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 15838, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BANYAN STREET AND WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC AND STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 15838 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Map 18838, located at the east side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the whole development. Tract 15838 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 15 acres into 49 lots. The Developers, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC and Standard Pacific Corp., are submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $539,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $269,600.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,850.00 //q CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 15838 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developers are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Willibj~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments · j BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION ~ NO~T. 1~ NT~ CITY OF ITEM: Tract /~'~3~:~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITlE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. ~-O~q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15838, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 15838, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated as developer, as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement Project and consisting of 49 lots located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15838 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific Corp. as developer; and WHEREAS, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC and Standard Pacific Corp, as Developers, submit for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15838 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ c~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15838 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XII1D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and /Z3 RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15838 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. /zq Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner o£the Property is: RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC AND STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. The legal description of the Property is: See attached Exhibit A on sheet A-2. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A- 1 TR 15838 /25 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION TO LIGHTING DISTRICT (FUTURE TRACT 15838) THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 5 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 518 RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020045227 ON JANUARY 30, 2002, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE GENERAL SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5 AS HAVING A BEARING AND A DISTANCE OF "SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST 294.89 FEET"; THENCE SOUTH 89024'03'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 219.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°35'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03.. WEST, A DISTANCE OF 52.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00035'57'. EAST, A DISTANCE OF 355.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 89024'03'. EAST, A DISTANCE OF 324.65 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 5. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 6 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE GENERAL NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6 AS HAVING A BEARING AND A DISTANCE OF "SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST 294.89 FEEl"'; THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 142.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 149.16 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE FROM SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 01"47'07" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°17'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 4.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°55'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 39.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 150.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°36'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00035'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01031'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 84.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°24'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00035'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 255.02 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LiNE OF SAID PARCEL 6, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89°42'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 372.65 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 14.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. w. P.L.S. 4593 DATE LICENSE E~(PIRES 9-30-2003 ~ 7 ~A~y~~ ~,, BOUND~Y OF ANN[~TION NORTH ~ NTS ~ . Iq~9~,l~q~ CITY OF ~T~M: ~ract ~ ~NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENG~EE~G DIVISION ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within thc North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15838 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD #7 +19 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B - 1 TR 15838 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 ,and 1 l~e 1 Init Tyne 1 lnit~ 1 lnit~ Factor I Initg 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Family Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15838) is: 49 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $870.73 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and 1 l~e 1 Init Tyne 1 lnit~ I lnit~ Factor 1 lnit~ 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Family Comm/lnd Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15838) is: 49 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,632.68 Annual Assessment C- 1 TR 15838 I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: Mamh 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lath, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 15902, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, SUBMI'I-I-ED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 15902 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 15902, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, is in the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Project that was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the whole development. Tract 15902 is a part of the subject Development Agreement and Rancho Etiwanda Project and is for the division of 7 acres into 25 lots. The homebuilder, US Home Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $220,700.00 Labor and Material Bond: $110,350.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 3,650.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP 15902 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC March 20, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer and Owner, Rancho Etiwanda 685 LLC, are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH ~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract ~NCHO CUCAMONGA T~TL~: Rancho Etiwanda ENG~EE~GDIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map I SO UTIO O. oq / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15902, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 15902, submitted by U.C.P. Incorporated, as a part of the Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Development Agreement/Project and consisting of 25 lots located at the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 6, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15902 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by US Home Corporation as builder; and WHEREAS, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC as Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15902 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~)~- (~ q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT 15902 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and /2¥ RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15902 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC March 20, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNC1L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC The legal description of the Property is: See Attached Exhibits "A-11" and "B-10/11" 15902 EXHIBIT "A-11" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 11 THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B. & M, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00°02'19, WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF, 40.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID EAST HALF, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT IN BOOK 7291, PAGE 516 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°02'19, WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 986.44 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, SOUTH 89°57'41'' EAST, 14.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19°49'48, EAST, 25.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86°44'51" EAST, 172.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 817.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 54.20 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°48'03'' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE SOUTH 89°27'06" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 80.59 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WESTERLY 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'19" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 948.90 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF SAID EAST HALF; THENCE NORTH 89025'52" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 330.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 7.24 ACRES. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B-10/11" ATFACHED HEREWITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALI ARD ENGINEERING MP~RK WARE, PLS 5820 EXP. 06/30/04 EXHIBIT 'B-lO/lr SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to thc City-wide district. Thc sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Ligh.t Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of thc City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15902 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD ti 1 67* 22* SLD #7 11 * SLD # 7 +11 · Installed with Rancho Etiwanda backbone improvements B- I TR 15902 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and 1 l~e l Init Tyne t lnit~ 1 lnit~ Factor I lnit~ 1 Init Revenne Single Family Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15902) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $833.00 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and 11~e l Init Tyne 1 lnitn 1 lnita Factor 11nits 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Family Comm/lnd Acm 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15902) is: 25 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $442.25 Annual Assessment C - I TR 15902 I~ A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DIVISION Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor SIJBJECr: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAiNTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAiNTENANCE DISTRICTS (LMD) NO. 9 AND NO. 10 TO TRUGREEN LANDCARE, BRANCH 6169, OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, iN THE AMOUNT OF $9,399.07 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 1139303-5300 (LMD 9) AND 1140303-5300 (LMD 10) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the award and authorize the execution of the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMD) No. 9 and No. 10 to the lowest responsible bidder, TruGreen LandCare, Branch 6169, of Ontario, California in the an~ount of $9,399.07, to be funded from account number 1139303-5300 for FY 01/02 and amounts to be appropriated for FY 02/03 in LMD No's 9 and 10, account numbers 1139303-5300 and 1140303-5300, respectively. It is further recommended that the City Council approve the issuance of a purchase order to fund the landscape maintenance of LMD 9 for the remainder of FY 01/02 and the issuance of a purchase order during FY 02/03 to fund the continuing landscape maintenance of LMD 9 and other areas of LMDs 9 and 10 as they are built and accepted by the City for maintenance. The contract is for the period May 22, 2002 through June 30, 2003 and is renegotiable on a year-to-year basis beginning July 1, 2003. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Council has approved the formation of LMDs 9 and 10. Tracts in those two LMDs are being built. No tracts in either LMD have been accepted with landscaped sites to be maintained by the City. It is possible that a tract in LMD 9 will be accepted in late April 2002. Other tracts in both LMDs 9 and 10 are anticipated to be accepted in both LMDs during FY 02/03. A contract for landscape and irrigation maintenance should be in effect when that first tract is accepted. Therefore, a Request for Bid was issued by the Engineering Section. Bids were received and opened on /ql Approval to Award LMD 9 and 10 Landscape Maint. Contract March 20, 2002 Page Two February 14, 2002 and subsequently, the bids were evaluated by the Maintenance Section. The bid submitted by TruGreen LandCare was the lowest responsible bid. TruGreen LandCare is the current landscape and irrigation maintenance contractor for LMDs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and has provided generally satisfactory service with deficiencies being expeditiously corrected. A bid summary is attached. Staff has reviewed the seven bids that were received and evaluated the three lowest. The three lowest are from TruGreen LandCare, Branch 6169, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises and Soltis. Each of those is complete and in accordance with the Request for Bid. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachment Iq2 BID SUMMARY FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 AND 10 MARCH 2002 BIDDER NAME BID AMOUNT TruGreen LandCare* $ 9,399.07 Mariposa Horticultural $12,308.76 Soltis $14,098.70 CLS Landscape Management $17,445.24 Azteca Landscape $19,225.44 DMS Landscape $ 30,892.00 Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. $ 71,205.48 *Apparent Low Responsive Bidder R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A NGINEEDING DIVI&ION StaffR port DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Engineer FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET (FORMERLY SUMMIT AVENUE) FROM BLUEGRASS AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE (APPROXIMATELY 2645 FEET) IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 13812, SUBMITTED BY PANDA DEVELOPMENT, SRA-26 RECOMMENDA'RON It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the street frontage Reimbursement Agreement for construction of Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) from Bluegrass Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue (approximately 2645 feet), and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tract 13812, Panda Development and Construction Corp., the developer, was required to construct Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) from Bluegrass Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue (approximately 2645 feet), The above-required street improvements has been completed by the developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer has submitted an itemized statement to the City to be reimbursed by future developers for construction costs of said street improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SRA-26 , March 20, 2002 Page 2 Staff has reviewed the statement for construction costs submitted and the City has established the sum of $116.70 per foot reimbursement for a full street section or the sum of $58.35 per foot reimbursement for a half-street section for Banyan Street from future developers per the terms specified in the Reimbursement Agreement. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JS:sc Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 02- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET FRONTAGE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-26) EXECUTED ON MARCH 20, 2002, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF BANYAN STREET (FORMERLY SUMMIT AVENUE) FROM BLUEGRASS AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a street frontage Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Panda Development, as developer of Tract 13812 for the installation of Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) from Bluegrass Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue- SRA-26; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said street improvements; and WHEREAS, the developer request reimbursement from future development for the portion of street improvements beyond the limits of his development as entitled to per the conditions of his development by means of said Reimbursement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said reimbursement agreement be and same is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said reimbursement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. /,/q R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager(-"~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer~/~ SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D-21 APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION PLANS ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM BENSON AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,000 AND AUTHORIZATION OF 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 112430356501248124. Item D-21 of the City Council Agenda, the account number should be changed as follows: From: 1124-303-5650/1248124 To: 1124-303-565011290124 WJO:dlw r~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ ~ G I NI~I~ D I N G DI~ DA I~ T FI~ N ¥ Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO' Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jori A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION PLANS ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM BENSON AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,000 AND AUTHORIZATION OF 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 112430356501248124. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve, award, and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates for the design of traffic signal interconnect system, and to provide traffic signal coordination plans on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue in the amount of $112,000, and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded from Account No. 112430356501248124. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In September of 2001, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland were awarded a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant in the amount of $100,000 for a joint signal timing and synchronization project on Base line Road. This project will develop new signal timing and coordination plans for 26 traffic signals on Base Line Road beginning at Benson Avenue at the west end to Etiwanda Avenue at the east end. Eight (8) of these signals are located in the City of Upland and eighteen (18) signaJs are located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION PLANS ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM BENSON AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,000 AND AUTHORIZATION OF 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 112430356501248124. March 20, 2002 Page 2 This project will also prepare plans, specifications and cost estimate for the installation of a traffic signal interconnect system beginning at Alta Cuesta in the west to Milliken Avenue in the east. All construction work is being done in the City of Rancho Cucamonga only. No construction work is being done in the City of Upland. Also, in November of 2001, the City received a grant from the San Manuel Indians in the amount of $100,000 for traffic congestion improvements. These funds will be used to pay for a portion of this project. City staff received proposals from 4 qualified engineering consultants. The consultant selection committee consisted of representatives from SANBAG, and the Cities of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga. After carefully reviewing the proposals, the selection committee recommended Kimley-Horn and Associates as the most qualified and responsive firm. The Professional Services Agreement has been reviewed by and is acceptable to the City Attorney. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:jag Attachments 1 0 I 2 3 Miles N S PROJECT LOCATION .... :LLS :.:: i0 VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-55, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA II, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 99-55 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 99-55, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Rancho Cucamonga II, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation Release: Faithful Performance Bond $58,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 5,800.00 Respectfully submitted, ,~ Williarh,_pf O Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-55 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 99-55, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~L~GiN E EI~IN G L) E PA D T~IE ~ T Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-76, SUBMITTED BY KHOSRO KHALOGHLI, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, WEST OF CLEVELAND RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 00-76 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 00-76, located on the north side of Sixth Street, west of Cleveland, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain the existing Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond. Developer: Khosro Khaloghli Retain: Faithful Performance Bond 817744S $138,114.00 Respectfully submitted,~ Willi~'~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ RESOLUTION NO. ~)o'~- ~)q~' A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-76 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OFA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 00-76, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R^ C h 0 C UCA MO DA]E: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15350, SUBMITTED BY GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES, INC., LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND SIXTH STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 15350 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15350, located the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: General Dynamics Properties, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond 814222S $693,100.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond 814222S $ 69,310.00 Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is 8th I STREET ~ 6th '~ STREET STREET VICINITY MAP N.T.S. CITY OF . ttm~: t~i{~C~Z 1~/?/~0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 33'rr.~._ I//C/Af/ TY' I~t~ KNGINRE~RrNG DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. O~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15350 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 15350, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ]~NGINgl~I~ING D ~ D A 1:2q~ PIE N ~f Staff Report DALE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACTS 15727-1, - 2, -3, -4, -5, LOCATED NORTH OF FOURTH STREET, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY CORNERPOINTE 85, LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tracts 15727-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, located north of Fourth street, between Hellman and Archibald Avenues, submitted by Cornerpointe 85, LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Cornerpointe 85, LLC 24005 Ventura Blvd. Calabasas, CA 91302 Respectfully submitte, d, Willi~ O. 0 Neil City Engineer WJO:/~B:Is Attachment 1~.1-11 L~ 1'|' "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NO. 1 STREET LI6HTIN6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1" = 400' STATE OF CALIFORNIA Tract 15727 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Dyer, Project Manager ,~© Richard Oaxaca, EngineeringrTechnician~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE I UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS FROM 4TM STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 01-089 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $570,791.84 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase 1 Utility Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4th Street to.Approximately 350 Feet South of 8th Street, Contract No. 01-089, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $554,281.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $57,079.18, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $570,791.84. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $570,791.84, which included three contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 2.98%. The original amount approved by Council was $609,709.10 ($554,281.00 plus 10%). Respa ~c~ully submitted., City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is /$Z 24TH ~T aTH ST ~ NTS ? tEOJ E CT o.T^~,o ~,= ,,~,= LOCATION CITY OF- RANCHO CUCAMONGA LO~ER HERMOSA AVENUE-PHASE 1 UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS 4TH STREET TO 350' S/0 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. (~ -~q ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS FROM 4TM STREET TO.APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 01-089 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OFA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase 1 Utility Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4t~ Street to Approximately 350 feet south of 8th Street, Contract No. 01-089, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N C- A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Dyer, Project Manager ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering ~'echnician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-101 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $190,735.44 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the 6~h Street Rehabilitation from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 01-101, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $184,424.10 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have bean received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $19,073.54, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $190,735.44. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $190,735.44, which included two contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 3.42%. The original amount approved by Council was $202,866.51 ($184,424.10 plus 10%). Re s, pec:,C'u Ily submitted, Will~a'm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:ls Attachments bT. 5T ~ NTS Z ONTARJO CITY LIMIT ?P-,.OJECT LOCATION cITy OF. RANCHO CUCAM0'NGA 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. 0~-(~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-101 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 01-101, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lucinda Hackett, Project Manage~. Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec'W~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK BRIDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 00-014 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $7,615,506.91 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project, Contract No. 00-014 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Per[ormance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $7,036,520.25 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $781,550.69, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $7,815,506.91. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $7,815,506.91, which included forty-three contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 11.07%. The original amount approved by Council was $7,740,172.28 ($7,036,520.25 plus 10%). Resp~.cJf~lly submitted; Willia~Y'& O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP P.r. oject _.4 S~te · .' ..... ' ,~, 6TH ST Z ~ [12 : ...... ~ .si FOOTHII.I, BLVD. AND HERMOSA AVE. b-~'Ol~ DPddN ILND MR. nlAN n~ROYRU~ITS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 00-014 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OFA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project, Contract No. 00-014, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PA R~f ~l E N T Staf:f Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FROM: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE METROLINK STATION EXPANSION, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 00-096 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,679,188.13 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II, Contract No. 00-096, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Per-[ormance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,605,971.75 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $81,408.11, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,679,188.13. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $1,679,188.13, which included sixteen contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 0.67%. The original amount approved by Council was $1,766,568.93 ($1,605,971.75 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, Willi~J. O'Nei~ City Engineer WJO:WS/RO:Is Attachments iilllJlllllillJlillilliliiliiliillllillllilli~/ ~11111ilIIII1t!I!11111111111111111111111111~ I I TEMPORARY III P~I~ING ~ ~ N.T.~. ~ .. . :: G~ERA~ DYNAMI~ · PROP~ , X-. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE METROLINK STATION EXPANSION, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 00-096 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING CFA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II, Contract No. 00- 096, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~NGINEEDING DEDADTHENT Staff Report DALE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer~'~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RED HILL PARK STORAGE BUILDING AND STORAGE SHED AND THE HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BID ALTERNATE NO. 2 (BUILDINGS A & B), CONTRACT NO. 01-055 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $142,093.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the Red Hill Park Storage Building and Storage Shed and the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Bid Alternate No. 2 (Buildings A & B), Contract No. 01-055, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $142,093.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $14,209.31, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $142,093.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $142,093.00, which included no contract change orders resulting in no change in the original contract amount. The original amount approved by Council was $156,302.30 ($142,093.00 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:WS/RO:Is Attachments /7¢ ALMOND ST. ,, = ~ ~ ~ -- RED HI~ COMMUN~ ~NE R~ ~ PARK (BUILDINGS "A' & 'B') ~.T.~ · - RED HILL PA~ STOOGE BUILDING AND STOOGE SHED PROJECT c.~- ":¥~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A w, ~,- VICINITY MAP L_ ~ ~w page . RESOLUTION NO. (-~ -/~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RED HILL STORAGE BUILDING AND STORAGE SHED AND THE HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, BID ALTERNATE NO. 2 (BUILDINGS A & B), CONTRACT NO. 01- 055 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Red Hill Park Storage Building and Storage Shed and the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Bid Alternate No. 2 (Buildings A & B), Contract No. 01- 055, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRoport DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni'bian-)~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-100 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $62,478.26 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of Banyan Street Right Turn Lane west of Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 01-100, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $63,619.50 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $6,247.83, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $62,478.26. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $62,478.26, which included three contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of minus 1.79%. The original amount approved by Council was $69,981.45 ($63,619.50 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments /77 F'I~.OJECT ON NTS 4TH 51 ONTAP-..IO CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-100 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Banyan Street Right Turn Lane west of Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 01-100, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. SlaffR ort DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Maria Perez, Assistant Engineer ,v~c~° Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION, CONTRACT NO. 01-070 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $526,956.77 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the Civic Center East Parking Lot Expansion, Contract No. 01-070, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $506,819.60 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $52,895.68, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $528,956.77. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $528,956.77, which included nine contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 4.37%. The original amount approved by Council was $557,501.56 ($506,819.60 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO;MP/RO:Is Attachments ?OOTHILL Bb ~::~..:.-:~!~., ~., co--FOOTHILL BI ITl / _CiViC CENTER. ." PBOJECT:CIVIC CENTER PABKING CITY OF LOT, EXPANSION RANCHO CUCAMONGA UMITS: APN 208-352-72 ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: VICINITY MAP /3/ RESOLUTION NO. (.~-/b~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION, CONTRACT NO. 01-070 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Civic Center East Parking Lot Expansion, Contract No. 01-170, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. T H E C I T Y 0 F ~AN CH 0 C tl CAFI 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Ndl, City Engineer BY: Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer A~,~ SUR1ECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 15, 2002, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS It is recommended that assessment rates remain at existing levels for all Landscape Maintenance Districts for FY 2002/2003. The water conservation efforts implemented within the landscape maintenance districts continue to help keep costs down, allowing the assessment rates to remain at the same levels as the rates for FY 2001/02. In many of the districts, back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some districts, an increase in the amount of landscaped area has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. However, this cost will be offset by corresponding increases in revenue received from new developments in the district. In past years, any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This offsetting mechanism still holds tree and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2002/2003 rates: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 20, 2002 Page 2 Landscape Maintenance District Assessment Rate per Assessment Unit LMD #1 - General City $92.21 LMD #2 - Victoria Planned Community $422.00 LMD #3A - Hyssop $413.74 LMD #3B - Commercial/Industrial $352.80 LMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50 LMD #5 - Tot Lot $113.29 LMD #6 - Caryn Planned Community $246.97 LMD #7 - North Etiwanda $307.05 LMD #8 - South Etiwanda $151.45 LMD #9 Lower Etiwanda $375.91 LMD #10 - Rancho Etiwanda $597.09 Respectfully submitt_ ed, Wil[iffn J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:RL:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. Oo~-/~) ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS iNTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHiN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, g, 9, AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPiNG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights- of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10." Description of Assessment Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 20, 2002 Page 2 No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 10", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Heating SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carded out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2002/2003. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 20, 2002 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City.Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. /b S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which as been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the subsequent proceedings. T HE CITY OF ~^NCHO CUCAMONGA S Repo t DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer // SUBJFA~: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 15, 2002, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts £or Fiscal Year 2002/2003. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts have been increased due to Southern Cali£omia Edison electric rate increases. In the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY 2002/2003 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2002/2003 rates which are recommended to remain the same as FY 2001/02 rates. The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 20, 2001 Page 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District Assessment Rate per Assessment Unit SLMD # 1 - Arterial $17.77 SLMD #2 - General City Local $39.97 SLMD #3 - Victoria' Planned Community $47.15 SLMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96 SLMD #5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60 SLMD #6 - Commercial/Industrial $51.40 SLMD #7 - North Etiwanda $33.32 SLMD #8 - South Etiwanda $193.75' *This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. Respectfully ~ubmitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:RL:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 0o~-/'~:~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights- of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of lq/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 20,2002 Page 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2002/2003. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. lqZ RESOLUTION NO. DO~ -/0 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGiNEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ? AND 8. NO iNCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which as been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the subsequent proceedings. Iq3 ~ H E CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer A~/ ~: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 15, 2002, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 15, 2002, to levy the annual assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is a 42-acre facility and is located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The district boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions, giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the assessment rates in /99' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT March 20, 2002 Page 2 PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $52.00 Less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3.50 $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $182.00 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00 25.01 acres and larger $1,300.00 Resp~tfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:RL:dlw Attachments /95 RESOLUTION NO. Oo~ -/~) g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS iNTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHiN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRJCT (PD-gS), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common park purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision' of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement) in connection with said district. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)." Description of Assessment Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD- 85), indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT March 20, 2002 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and mom particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. . approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2002/2003. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll, such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 1 77 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT March 20, 2002 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. Od- / ~) ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and flied with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which as been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2002/2003 for the subsequent proceedings. ORDINANCE NO. 6g 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Sectjrn 5.'1, (1978).. Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Name of Street and Limit~ Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph) 1. Wilson Avenue - Carnelian Street NP 40 to Hellman Avenue 2. Wilson Avenue - Hellman Avenue NP 40 to Amethyst Avenue (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and .2.00 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE Page 2 (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 3. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ' AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ~and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga h~ld on the Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk THE CITY OF I~AN CliO CIJ CA~ION GA Staff Report DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ACIP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB']-1'16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - The '., appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve a request to subdivide 24.2 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29, and a portion of 17. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001- 00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve a request to construct 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29, and a portion of 17. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-1'16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council continue the appeal of the project for two weeks to the April 3, 2002, meeting to allow the appellants and the developer additional time to settle unresolved project issues. BACKGROUND: Neighborhood meetings were conducted on November 20, 2001, and January 17, 2002. Subsequently, the project was reviewed by the advisory committees. The project was redesigned based upon recommendations of the Design Review Committee. The Planning Commission CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUB-i-]'16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION March 20, 2002 Page 2 conducted a public hearing to consider Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-r16257, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 on January 9, 2002, and continued the item to the January 23, 2002, meeting. Eight residents cited their concerns about the project, which included traffic and blocked access to their properties, design and site layout of the project, and fire safety concerns. The subject appeal was filed in a timely fashion by six petitioners on January 31, 2002. The appeal was considered and reviewed by the City Council at the March 6, 2002 meeting. A continuance was requested by the appellants and developer for two weeks to allow additional time and opportunity of the referenced parties to settle unresolved project issues. Staff has contacted both the developer and the property owners to coordinate a meeting to identify all issues and factual information, however, as of the writing of this report (March 14, 2002), there continues to be conflicts in scheduling of time and location of such a meeting. Staff will continue to contact said parties in an effort to coordinate a meeting prior to the scheduled City Council hearing. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:KC:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - City Council Staff Report dated March 6, 2002 Exhibit "B" - Appellants' Letters dated January 31, 2002 Exhibit "C" - Chronological time line of project events Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 23, 2002 Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Resolution 02-17 Exhibit "F" - Planning Commission Resolution 02-18 Exhibit "G" - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 23, 2002 Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 Draff Resolution to Deny Appeal for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 THE CITY OF I~ANCQO CI~CA~ONCA DATE: March 6, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AClP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB']-r16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve a request to subdivide 24.2 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29, and a portion of 17. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001- 00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve a request to construct 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29, and a portion of 17. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUB'1-]'16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal filed in opposition to the project, thus upholding the decision of the Planning Commission approving the Conditional Use Permit application. BACKGROUND: Neighborhood meetings were conducted on November 20, 2001, and January 17, 2002. Subsequently, the project was reviewed by the advisory committees. The project was redesigned based upon recommendations of the Design Review Committee. The Planning Commission CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUB'I-r16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION March 6, 2002 Page 2 conducted a public hearing to consider Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 on January 9, 2002, and continued the item to the January 23, 2002, meeting (Exhibit "F"). Eight residents cited their concerns about the project, which included traffic and blocked access to their properties, design and site layout of the project, and fire safety concerns. The subject appeal was filed in a timely fashion by six petitioners on January 31, 2002 (Exhibit "A"). ANALYSIS: The appellants pose the following points in their appeal: January 31, 2002 Letter from Don Glover 1. The residents surrounded by the proposed project were not satisfactorily involved in the City review process. Response: The City followed established practice by mailing hearing notices, posting the property, and publishing a legal advertisement in the local newspaper. In addition, residents were given the additional opportunity of participating in various neighborhood meetings after the application was deemed complete for processing (Exhibit "B"). Neighborhood meetings are not required by ordinance. The City's ordinance provides primary opportunity for public comment through the duly noticed public hearing of the Planning Commission. 2. The environmental study with subsequent Negative Declaration did not involve input from the affected property owners. In addition, No written response was provided to issues identified in a January 9, 2002, letter of concern. Response: Neither CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) nor the City's Environmental Guidelines require written response to comments on proposed Negative Declarations. A neighborhood meeting was conducted before th~ Draft Initial Study was circulated for public comment prior to the scheduled Planning Commission meeting. No written comments were provided by the public until January 9, 2002 (the date of the original public hearing). The adopted initial study addresses the environmental issues identified by the CEQA Guidelines, and is compliant with said Guidelines. A Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was provided to the public 20 days prior to the public hearing, above and beyond the single method required, by 1) publication in newspaper, 2) posting on site, and 3) mailing to residents. Lastly, at the January 23 Planning Commission meeting, the environmental concerns and issues identified by the adjacent property owners were discussed and addressed in the written staff report and during the public hearing process (Exhibit "F"). 3. Concerns raised in a letter dated January 8, 2002, regarding access, grading, utilities, aesthetics and prescriptive easements were not addressed at the January 23, 2002, Planning Commission Meeting. Response: All of the concerns identified in the January 8, 2002, meeting were responded to in the written staff report to the Planning Commission. Regarding alleged "prescriptive easement" rights; staff consistently informed residents that the burden of proof is theirs. Despite repeated requests, no evidence was submitted indicating a court decision establishing prescriptive easements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION Mamh 6,2002 Page 3 4. Issues identified in a letter dated January 23, 2002, to the Planning Commission were not addressed. Response: There was considerable overlap of issues in the letters received. Again, no evidence was ever submitted by residents to substantiate that this project will create environmental effects that warrant mitigation. One of the key decisions in the CEQA process is determining whether a project will have a significant effect. In short, determining significant effect requires careful judgment based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data and based on information in the record. To date, no factual data has been provided to support such claims. 5. Resolution No. 02-18 imposing conditions on the developer in regard to utilities is in error. Response: The condition regarding utilities for the adjacent lots, as written in Resolution 02-18, was read aloud and approved by the Planning Commission at their January 23, 2002, meeting. This condition reads "The applicant shall provide underground utility connections to the lots surrounded by the proposed project subject to City Planner review and approval." The minutes reflect the discussion between the Commissioners and the developer in which the developer agreed to provide the utility connections. January 31, 2002 Letter from Other Residents 1. Resolutions imposing conditions on the developer in regard to utilities are in error. Response: The condition regarding utilities for the adjacent lots, as written in Resolution 02-18, was read aloud and approved by the Planning Commission at the January 23, 2002, meeting. This condition reads, "The applicant shall provide underground utility connections to the lots surrounded by the proposed project subject to City Planner review and approval." The minutes reflect the discussion between the Commissioners and the developer in which the developer agreed to provide the utility connections. 2. Issue regarding ingress and egress of an existing dirt road for property owners along Chervil Street, as well as emergency access and proper turn-around area. Response: Residents of a private dirt road, Chervil Street, have made no improvements to their access. After visiting the street, Fire Marshal Ralph Crane, told the Planning Commission that the street is not wide enough for fire trucks, nor have the trees been trimmed to allow access. The Fire Marshal also stated that the proposed project would eliminate a fire hazard (open grassy fields) around residences, and provide ample fire hydrants for water supply. The proposed development will not change Chervil Street in any way, except to extend certain utilities or storm drains. The residents have the ability to provide an access "turn-around" within their own properties. Specifically, there is sufficient room for turn-around on the south side of Chervil Street (the rear yard of APN 227-211-23). ClTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION Mamh 6,2002 Page 4 3. Concerns of developing an apartment project to surround existing single-family residences. Response: The property for the proposed project has been designated for Multi-Family (8-14 dwelling units per acre) since the 1981 General Plan adoption. The 1981 General Plan designated the properties owned by the petitioners at 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The recent General Plan Update amended the designation of the petitioners' properties to 8-14 dwelling units per acre so that all of the properties in this block have the same General Plan Designation of 8-14 dwelling units per acre. 4. Statement regarding that it would have been beneficial to have further negotiations between the developer and the surrounding residents. Response: Two neighborhood meetings were conducted. In addition, the developer met with the residents at least two times prior to the Planning Commission review and approval. Acceptable terms between the developer and the residents could not be reached. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appellants' Letters dated January 31, 2002 Exhibit "B" - Chronological time line of project events Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 23, 2002 Exhibit "D"- Planning Commission Resolution 02-17 Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Resolution 02-18 Exhibit "F" - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 23, 2002 Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 TO: City Clerk, City of eancho Cucamonga City Council, city of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Don Olover OF ~J/V 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Cftc. RE: Appea!.~f.t~.e_ Following: (~1) DRC 2OO1-TOO557 (Forecast Homes - Etiwanda Gardens) (2) SUB?T 16257 (Forecast Homes - Efiwanda.Gardens) DATE: January 31, 2002' Dear Sirs & Madams: I hereby appeal the vote of approval by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 'al their meetin8 on January 23, 2002 in regard to DRC 2001- 00557 and SUBTT 16257 (Forecast Homes - Etiwanda Gardens). The reasons for the appeal include, among olher reasons that will be presented to the City Council, the following:. (1) The residents surrouhded by the above referenced project, said project beln8 referred to as the 'Donut Hole~ project by city staff, failed to satisfactorily involve the affected homeowners In the city review process as has been previously done for other proiects, thus violatin8 well established City practices. The only meetings that were noticed were on or about November 2!, 2001, January 17, 2002 and January 23, 2002. The affected homeowners were not made aware of technical review or design review meetings or provided with sufficient information in e timely manner by city staff. (2) The environmental study by the city consultant, with subsequent negative declaration, did not involve any input from the affected 'Donut Hole' homeowners orthe surrounding community. The Ci~ failed to respond to Trace Glover's questions, ~ssues and disagreement as outlined in her letter of January 9, 2002, to the Plannin8 Commission. It is our understandln8 that State law requires that the City address these questions° issues and concerns, point by point, and in writing. Additionally~..we understand that City policy has historically solicited input from the comrnu~!ty prior to startir,8 the study; this was completely ignored here. ' Ci~ Cler~ City of Rancho Cuc~mon~a~ Cily Council, C~ of Ra~ C~ Jan~ 31, 2~ P~ 2 (3) T~e Don Glover & ~ Rusling letter of Janua~ g, 2~2 to ~ Planni~ Commission was ~ the most parl ign~ed. Issues ~ access, 8radin& utilities, aesthetics, were left unans~red. Issues oF pres~lpti~. e~sements ~th ~o lhe CI~ and t~ '~nut Hole' ho~ners ~ brushed aside ~ eot being relevant wilho~ any legal ju~lflcati~ ~ law ciled by the Ci~ A~n~. (4) The ~Uer of ~anua~ 23, 2~2 to the Plannin8 Commission by Gloat most other affected residents was complelely ~8~ed. This lefler Cen[ered on Che~il Sl~eet and lhe need to provide adequale easemen~ and to the residenls. Additionally, The entire issue of ~ that is, mitigating the ~verse impact to our homes caus~ by ~is devaluer, is completely ignored. This pro~t ~s ~ an 'as of ri~t' develop~nl, but . instead, necessit=led di~retl~a~ approvals by the Plannin8 Commissi~s. As s~h, lhe Planning Commission had full auth~ Io i~ose CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL on this proj~t as to ~ol~t t~ h~rs. (5) Most regrettab~, the resolution imposi~ ~ndltions.~ the devest in r~a~ to utilities is IN ERROR. A revlew d the m~tin8 tran~Hpts will show that the Hannin8 Commissi~ intended that all uliliti~ be provi~d Io t~ homeownes so as to provi~ for maximum a~Ument ~nsity, about 65 units in total, ~ ~e homeo~er Iols if they were de, loped and lhat the utilities ~uld be provided at the west end of ~e~il and the ~Sl of t~ Glover e~sement (not stoppin8 at Eliwanda). In s~, ~ 'Donut Hole" hom~wners are being 'wall~-in' and f~tten by the Ci~. We will no loner be pa~ of the communi~. We can~ use the sidewal~ or streets of this de~lopment. No Ci~ easements h~ been required thrmgh conditions of approval like ot~r pro, ts. We req~st thai ~e C!~ Council send this project back to the Plannin8 Co~ission and in~ the ~m~wners. Please ~ nol abandon usl · P.S. Further information shall be provid~ ~ February 4, 2~2. TO: City of Rancho Cueamonga Planning Coramlssion__ 12820 Ch~fl S~ Ran~ . R~st to Ap~al ~e J~ 23, 2002 ~ of F~ Deve!0Pmem at Etiw~~ We ~ a~ve ~ home 0~ would like to appeal ~e d~i~..~e by ~ RC P~ Co--sion ~ approved me pmp~ F~ee~t Ap~t ' ' · e PI~ Co~ss~n ~ ~ develo~r lj~y ~evifi world be immll~ to ~ ~ of 14 ~ ~r a~ at Fo~t " so~m ~ion ofo~ nei~bo~ pmp~ies ~ ~ ~-wes~ eom~ of o~ adjacem pro~ies, howev~g ~ re~e~ ~ ~ol~on NO. 02-1 0248 ~s w~ not cl~ m~ n~ de~ s~ .... ~ssm over ~ e~ d~ ~ th~ ~ ~n m pubic ~ f~ sev~l 5~ (~ ~ 18 y~) ~ ~ e~ss ~ ~s~ for the pwp~ o~ ~n, ~ pubgc ut~ ~d ~ee ~m~. We ~e Wo~d cut ~ss to t~ ro~ offma~ng it irascible wOmd, going ~ ~' b~ up ~e entke le~ ora 700' mad oa ~ . Eti~ Ave, e~ ~ alte~te ~y m e~ d~ng ~ em~e~y or othe~i~ block~ ro~ due ~ ~y ~n of mad co~ No. ~ ! of 2 would like to demand that the developer be required to research the possibility ora set-back of that wall to allow adequate space to turn vehicles around at thc very least or consider the possibility of leavil~ the entire road as_is for thorough ingress and egress. Another concern raised is the ~rrow entry to Chervil StreeL The ProPerty on the South-eastern portion of Chervil street is owned by the Forecast Development. A]thouglg this property is not currency being developed, it should be noted that in a master Plan for this community it would be beneficial for the~e to be at least a 15' setback onto the Forecast property of the proposed future perin-~ter wall to .allow adequate space to widen Chervil Street to min. 30' at the Etiwanda entrance to Chervil a~l on to the end. Furthermore, leaving 9 sin&lc family residential homes completely surr°~' by 368 unit lwo-stoO- apartment complex just doesn't make sense in terms'Of master planning a cohesive community. We are diligent in mque.~ the conditions of approval that we are for the sake 0fretaining real-estate value in our homes for future development ofour land since the propoa.-d zoning c/iange would be raised to suslain up to 14 units per acre. These..rejuests do little to alleviate our concerns as people being ~ubjected to.living in a font,ess' of apartments but hopefully these conditions will l~elp protect om'' · "' ' investmems. It would make more sense to either deveJop the sutr0i~fi,4]ng land to confiarm to the existin& land use o£single family homes, .~eg~'dless of potential to cOm~orm to the proposed developmenL To leave'9'h6roes' ': ' " surrounded by 368 apartments is not smart planning. It seems tl~at fuRher .... consideration should be given to ma~er-plannlng thl, COi:Oi),,mily before Forecast break~ groia~ on th~.e development Finally., Planning Commission members referred ~ 'it would have been bencti¢ial" had there been further ~:gotiations between the developer and ua the residents at neighborhood meetings. However, l~e.projeot was approved deSPite the ~ippareat need for further discussion for us to come ~o better terr~. We would like the opportunity to see the developer modify the' final approval of this project. Therefore, we request an appeal approval of this project to.The City Council of gane-ho C-~cam-onga- ResPectfully subrnilted by the above named property 0wt,.rs. · .... Page2 CHRONOLOGY FILING DESCRIPTION/ACTIVITY FILING DATE Reviewed for completeness by. Planning & Engineering Divisions September 11, 2001 Application filed for second round process and review October 16, 2001 Deemed complete for processing November 1, 2001 Reviewed by Grading Review Committee November 20, 2001 Applicant conducted first Neighborhood Meeting November 20, 2001 Reviewed by Design Review Committee as consent calendar item December 4, 2001 Public Hearing Notices mailed out for January 9, 2002 P.O. Meeting December 20, 2001 Planning Commission Public Hearing/Environmental Consideration January 9, 2002 Item continued to next Planning Commission Public Hearing January 9, 2002 Planning Commission Public Hearing Review and Approval January 23, 2002 Public Hearing Notices mailed out for March 6, 2002 City Council Hearing February 21, 2002 City Council Appeal Public Hearing March 6, 2002 C I T Y OF Staff Report DATE: January 23, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB'I-r16257 - FORECAST CORPORAT ON - A request to subdiv de 26.7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Res dential District (8-14 dwe lng units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from January 9, 2002) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001- 00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from January 9, 2002) BACKGROUND: The proposed project was continued from the January 9, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to conduct a second public neighborhood meeting on January 17, 2002, (the original neighborhood meeting was held on November 20, 2001) with the adjacent property owners to address identified issues and concerns noted to date. The continuance was requested by both the applicant and the surrounding residents. Attached are letters of correspondence received to date regarding issues and concams relating tO the proposed project (Exhibit "A"). Additionally, attached is a letter dated January 17, 2002, by the applicant 'Forecast Homes' noting an amendment to the project to delete the 2.5-acre parcel fronting Etiwanda Avenue (APN: 227-211-17) from the application (Exhibit "B"). Removal of this parcel will eliminate two buildings (one Building Type B, and one Building Type C) resulting in a reduction of ,, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT 16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 2 26 apartment units from the proposed project. The revised project area is 24.2 acres and the revised total number of apartments is 342 units, Revised plans will be provided at the January 23, 2002, Planning Commission Meeting. ANALYSIS: In their January 9 letter, Mr. Don Glover (7954 Etiwanda) and Mr. Joe Rusling (12837 Chervil Street) request that additional conditions of approval be imposed to address 10 issues. Staff' believes that the deletion of the 2.5-acre parcel from the proposed project resolves many of these issues. 1. Utilities to Glover and Rusling Lots -The residents believe they have utility easement and possibly prescriptive rights for certain utilities lines; however, no copies of the alleged easements or legal documents establishing prescriptive rights have been submitted. With the deletion of the 2.5-acre parcel, the proposed project will not alter any existing utilities serving the surrounding residents. No condition is recommended. 2, Access to Sidewalks - The project is proposed to be developed under the Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires one 10-20 foot wide continuous on-site greenway easement across the project site for the express purpose to "link private common areas with public areas, such as streets or community trails" and to "provide connections to existing or planned greenways located on adjacent property." There are numerous sidewalk connections through the proposed project. Although there are no existing greenways on surrounding properties, it is reasonable to assume that development of the surrounding properties at a similar density would also require a greenway. A condition of approval has been added to the resolution. 3. Easement on Entry Road and Streets "A' and "B" - With the deletion of the 2.5 acre parcel, which contains the existing access easement for Mr. Glover, the proposed project will not alter the existing access via dirt roads to either parcel. Mr. Rusling's lot takes access from Chervil Street, which is a pdvate street that is not being altered by this development. No condition is recommended. 4. Elimination of Masonry Barriers Along Streets "A" and "B" - The residents want the block wall changed to a wrought iron fence. A condition of approval has been added to the resolution. 5. Access Easements Along Streets "A' and "B' - Same as #3. 6. Electric Gates Eliminated - The proposed prOject is a gated development. Again, with the deletion of the 2.5 acre parcel, which contains the existing access easement for Mr. Glover, the proposed project will not alter the existing access via dirt roads to either parcel. Mr. Rusling's lot takes access from Chervil Street, which is a private street that is not being altered by this development. No condition is recommended. 7. Landscape Screening - Residents desire "heavy landscape screening" around their lots for pdvacy. The project design includes the desired extensive landscaping, in particular trees. Per the City's standards, the project is required to plant 45 trees per gross acre, including 20 percent in large "box" sizes. This condition was already recommended as Planning Division Standard Condition F.2. in the CUP resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUB'C1'16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST HOMES January 23,2002 Page 3 8. Construction Access - Residents desire construction access through the proposed project in the future. See 9. Existing Utilities for Single Family Homes - Same as #1. Residents want this developer to connect their existing homes to his utility and telephone system. Again, with the deletion of the 2.5 acre parcel, the proposed project will not alter existing utility service to the existing homes. No condition is recommended. 10. Trash & MaiIRelocation - Residents want easement for trash and pick-up. Again, with the deletion of the 2.5-acre parcel, the proposed project will not alter existing trash or mail access. No condition is recommended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC/jjc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letters of Correspondence Exhibit "B" - Letter from Forecast Homes dated January 17, 2002 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 9, 2002 Draft Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTI'16257 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 ~ . ~'~¥ OFRA~iCNo CUCAMONGA · " TO: Brad Bullet, City Planner JAN 03 City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED. PLANNING FROM: Don Olover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Joe Ruslin8 12837 Che~il Street, Re,ho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartmems - Impa~ On O~ Homestead Properties January 2, 2002 Dear Sir:. . We are two contiguous home owners whose properties wou!d be surrounded on three sides by the proposed Etiwanda Apartments, a project by Forecast Homes. ........... ,- a--t 22 (a,,,,roximatelv 2 acres) and Don Glover's property is .Joe Kust,n8 s .prvp=,. ~.,~ ~,__, -..r-~.~........ ,~,.. attached County Assessor's Map. lot 23 (approximately rz acreal e~ a,~,w,, ..,. ...... Also note the proposed Etiwanda Apartments development shown on the map. we were invited, alon8 with other neighbors, to a meeting held by Forecast Homes at City Hall on November 20, 2000. Forecast Homes presented their plan and asked if we had any questions. We were frankly shocked. We expressed our concern about access to our properties, how we would 8et water & 8es from Eflwande Avenue to our properties and expressed our 8eneral concern a .b~. ut a proposed eight foot high wall towering over our properties alon8 the property hnes of the proposed development. Additionally, there was also nothing in the plans that indicated what the Impact would be of surface water drainage on or over our properties from the proposed development. Ahhough the plans showed some form of access to our properties, the developer ' questioned our right to a county easement to our properties, stating that the easement was .'his easement". Also, there was no discussion of how we would . access our properties while the project was being developed. all in all the meeting gave us no assurances that our properties would not be.. affected. ~,c~ditionally, the city representative that was present ,,,cl very little and did not advise us about our rights. the next meeting we had was on December 27, 2OOI with th (Glovef & RustJin8~ were there along with four of the six properly owners along Chervil Street, It quickly became apparent that the sole purpose of the. meetin8 was for Forecast to buy us out However, in our opinion, Forecast wes lookm8 to buy our properties at below market value. Don Glover asked the dave oper for la~d sale compar~bles, b~t the developer said it was not relevant. We have subsequently received a lener from City Hall that there will be a Planning Board meeting on January g, 2002 in regard Io the approyal of the project. Frankly, this was a great surprise to us. We were surprised that It has 8otten this far without any input from us, the people most affected. We do not believe that the developer or the city have adequately provided us wilh the information necessary for us to respond. So, we request that you postpone any deliberation In re~erd to Etlw~nda Gardens on your scheduled January 9, 2002 meetin8. Also, in order for us to adequately evaluate the impact on our houses, we request thal you provide us with the foliowin8 information needed bY our plannln~ consultant: i. The complete submittal set for Etiwande Gardens, including all conceprual grading and utility plans. 2. A copy of the city's negative declaration in regard to the project. 3. Forecast's application and all staff reports in regard to the property. 4. If available· transcripts of design review meetings between Forecast and the city. We believe the negative declaration on this pro~ect was premature and that the city did not provide us with the information needed to respond. The city of Rancho Cucam. onga has a reputation for respecting the property righrS of all property owners, not lust bi8 developers. Don Glover's family has owned its land for over 100 years and Joe Ruslin8 has also been a Ion8 time resident, Again, we request that this project not go fonvard until we are adequately and faldy informed and that we have an adequate and fair opportuni~ to respond. We need assurances from the oily that our property rights wdl be protected through conditions placed on this development, If It Is approved. As a first step, we look forward to meeting, with you and being provided with the above requested information. Please call Don Glover at 9Og-221Lg465 if you have ' any questions. Sincerely,, L' ' · Don Glover r'oe eushn TO:. Brad Btdler,' C~y Platme~ City of Pomcho ~ Tiros l~miel Sandoval & ~ Sandoval 12820 Chervil SWeet, Rancho Cucama~a On the County of San Berimrdino Assessso~'s Map, Boek 227, Pa~ 21 please see fl~ Owners of Lot # 32 and Lot #33. C_rail Tiros is the Property Owner of Lot #34. Daniel Sandowal and Aumitn Sandoval are the Prepen'y Owner~ of Lot #35. january 6, 2002 We are a emcerned c~nmunity of home owners v~no ere seeking to poettx~e the public hearing Sanuary 9th to allow us adequate tlme to research and presmt o~ concerns to ~e city. Fir~ ofalt, two of · ~e nixie m~ti~med property own~s were n~ infon~ed of~ mee~n$ until Donte! ,~mdov~ ~t~ oth~ not prepared to respond. As a °~nmunitywe have discussed the imF~ct lhat ~l~is devel°pment w°uld ha~ Acts of Crime W°Uld be mere likel~ to°ccar due t° the Increased P~ ttmt w°uld result fi'mn this dcvelopmmt, regardless ofthe "upscale" designation ofthes~ npartment buildings. (As consulted by an experienced Poliee Officer this is a known tinct.) · ' Difficulty to Improve this community would result if the block wall proposed by the development were to be put in place before property owners hav~ time to ~ mgldng the followin~ erosim of exi.~ng fond. v~ installation of a sev~- s~em in ~he future may n~ be ~'ble at~r surr°rndm-° development ts eemple~d. · ~. Upgrade ofwnter lines nnd public utilities f0~ these Pr°Pe~ez may n°t be passibl~ sm'otm4;n~ ~-vdopmmt is e~mpleted. v~ Aesthetic issues such a,s, loss of mo~mtain view, tm'al nnture ofihe sm-rotmdlng proart'y, and incrensed noise nnd Irafflc due to the apartment development.' e' ' Construction of a block wall arotmd o~r properties, especially along the existing dirt road should lhe developer choose to purchase Lot #22 and Lot #23 leavin~ lhe other properties, would limit the ability for vehicles to turn nround on ~r road, would result in a potential fire hazard should future construc~on m our road be required sin~e there would be no a~ess by As property owners we feel llke our concerns have not been given ~he forum to be addressed and resolved. All meetings to this point with the developers or thc city have been primarily focused c~l il~erm~g ils ' whnt is plnnned to go in around us rather than seriously considering our concerns. We have attempted to point out some of'our concerns but to our knowledge these issues have not been i',~ally recorded ncr given any nttention towards resolving these potential problems t~nt could result due to the devel,~ent · · We res~ requesi that the scheduled public hearing be postponed until we have been ~iven adequate time and council to f~mally address, research, and ev~tually resolve ot~ concerns. According to the Notice of Public Hearing received by the Sandoval's the final slatement alarms us to the possibility ~hat only those is,m~s raised at lhe i~bH¢ hearln8 would be s~ject to cl~allenge in a court of law. Also in concernment with the above raised need to postpone the public hearing to allow time and comagl TO: City PI;~nnTfi8 Commission· City of RanCho Cucamonga 04,,7. FROM: Don Glover ' ~'~p~,. 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga . Joe Ruslin8 " 12837 Chevil Street, Rancho ~camonga..""~'O, ~' SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments - Addlhonal COnditions of Approval January 9, 2002 Dear Members of the City Planning Commission: We are the homeowners on lots 22 (Ruslin8) and 23 (GIover) that will be surrounded on three sides by the above referenced project. ' Detailed plans and related staff reports were not made aVailable'to us until January 8, 2002, just one .day before this meeting. We were not notified about or invited to any . design review or technical review Committee yari.ngs.. The only official city .m. eeting'that . occurred was on November 20, 2OO1; no technical mf0~'mati°n was made avadable to us at that meeting. The only other meeting was one held by the developer on November 20, 2000 at City Hall to "unveil" his preliminary scheme. Although 'open to questions', no background information was volunteered by the developer. The city representative present did not advise us of our rights. Additionally, we believe this project was not adequately posted. The city Planner advised us on January 8, 2002 that there was a public posting on Chervil Street. Frankly, this posting, although it may have been there, was not visible to us. No posting was made near the entry road to our property on Etiwanda. 'Additionally, there should have been a posting on each of the legal parcels comprising this development, especially the ones adjacent to our property. How would we know which parcels the postin8 applies to? Don Glover and neighborhood friends met with the city planner and the Project planner on Tuesday evening, January 8, 2002; the meeting was at our request. Don asked that additional "conditions of approval" be applied to the proposed development to protect. our utility and access rights, as well as to ensure that our properties can be feasibly redeveloped in the future if we decide to move from our homes due to the great adverse impact the development will have on our quality of life. The city planner did not make any commitments, but requested that we do a conceptual site plan, embodyin8 our proposed conditions for this planning commission meeting, today, January 9, 2002. Regrettably' the twenty-four hours available to us was not sufficient to meet his reqUest. Pn~e 1 of 3 Proposed Additional Conditions of Approval (1) Utilities to Donut Lots - Lot 23 (Glover) and Lot 22 (Ruslin_~). We understand that we have both a legal easement and possibly prescriptive rights for certain utility lines to our properties through the proposed project. We request that the city condition the developer to provide easements to any future development on our properties to enable such development to "plug-into" the proposed project's water, gas; drainage & sewer lines, as well as telephone & cable conduits. The infrastructure should be upsized if necessary to accommodate at least 32 apartment units as shown On the developer's .conceptual plan for the development of our lots. We want these utility access rights from streets A & B 'as labeled by..us for clarity on the attached site plan~ ('2) Access to SideWalks, · We want access easements to sidewalks on streets "A" & "B", as well as all ~idewalks leading out of the development to Foothill .Boulevard or Chervil Street. This can also be possible in the form of a public easement to the city. Access to theSe sidewalks or roads via pedestrians should be allowed'at any reasonable location from our properties. (3) Easement on Entry Road and Streets "A" & 'B", . ' We want access easements to the entry road from Etiwanda AvenUe (generally shown were our existing easement lies) as well as easements to use streets 'A' & mB'. This Can be.accomplished also by giving the city a public easement over these areas. Emergency easement access to any future connection by the project to Chervil Street should also be given. (4) Elimination of Masonry. Barriers Alon_ Streets 'fA" g ,B",' : The eight foot masonry walls should be eliminated on these streets and replaced With aesthetically pleasing six foot wrought iron fencing. Also, a four foot landscape buffer should be provided between the property lines and the fence on the side of the donut home lots. The city has required this elsewhere. (5) Access Easements AlonI~ Streets '~A" g 'B", : ' ~ ' We require two access easements onto Street mA" and one onto street. 'B'. as shown on the.. attac.hed, . plan. Again, we believe, we may already, have "pres~ri. ptive easement . r~ghts along the roads bordering the property hnes on two s~des of our homes. Again, we request that the city require public easements onto these roads. Similarly, we want the right .to have full driveways handling any level of development on our properties connectin8 to these streets. (B) Electric Gates Eliminated, Consistent with our legal and prescriptive easement rights, there should not be any electric gates along the access road from Etiwanda Avenue or along Streets 'A' & 'B,. Page 2 of 3 (7) Landscape $creenin~_~ Heavy landscape screening should be required fOr the buildings surrounding our property to allow us privacy. The city has required this elsewhere. (8) Construction ACCess. . A specific condition should be imposed on the project allowing for construction access in the event the donut properties are developed. (9) Existing Utilities for Single Family Homes. The developer should be required to connect our existing homes on lots 22 and 23 directly to his utility and telephone system. The current connections to £tiwanda Avenue will likely be disturbed during construction anyway. Adequate provisions for utility meters should be made also. (10) Trash & Mail Relocation, A condition for an easement for trash pick-up and also'mail pick-up should be included for donut lots 22 and 23. Conclusion~ : : These proposed conditions should be considered by the planning commission before any vote is taken on this project. ~ The staff report briefly touches on easement rights but is sketchy at best and pr°posed no clear conditions. We request thata meeting be set up with the city planner, city engineer, water district, the developer and us to work out an agreement. Sincerely, Do'~f~l~ver Joe/R~Jsling. Page 3 of 3. TO: Jack Lam, ~ y anager Brad Buller, City Planner Jim Markman, City Attorney CiTY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ROM: Don & Tr~y GloVer J~N ] ~ ~. 7954 Eriwanda Avenue. Rancho Cuc~m~nga Joe Ruslln8 R£C£1V£o . PLANNINg 12837 Chevil Street, Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Request for Public Hearing on Environmental Issues Regardin8 the Etiwanda Ape.r trnents Project (The "Donut Project') Dear Sirs; Tracy Glover submitted the attached letter comment;n8 on the Negative Declaration prepared by the City Consultant in regard to the above referenced project. This was to be presented at the Planning Commission meetin8 of January 9 on this proje~ but this project was puJled from the agenda.. .. As can be seen from the attached letter, we believe the ne8ative declaration was premalure and that the consultant's review of the issues is woefully incomplete. Furlfiermora, because of the impact that the above development, referred to by clly staff as the 'Donut Project', has on our homes and o.~' neighbors lying In the .':whole of ~he do, ut', · public hearing s~ould haw been held with the oily consultant to soiled! questions and comments and to outline the scope of the environmental analysis. This .was not.done. In her letter, TraCY has prepared comments and raised questions about the clly's environmental consultanrs reporT. These questions shodld be addressed In wrltln8 before anyrhln8 else h~ppens on this project. Additionally, a public meeting or forum should be held to br'ef and sol,tlr questions and comments from o'ur ne 8hbors; these questions and comments should then also be answered in wl'itJrl~. It is our understanding that state law required a public meeting and public input on projects of rh~J magnitude be[ora lhey ere approved end that the publl¢ Is efitJtled to have their questions and comments answered in writin8. : Therefore, we believe that any Plannl~ Commission vote at the newly reschedUled meetin8 of .lanuaty 23, 2002 Is greatly premature. At best, this meetin,~ should be a publicly noticed meeting on the consu~tanrs environmental reporl in which t-he public can'ask questions and make commentS. This should be followed by follow-up meetings In which rha consultant addresses the community's concerns and subsequently answers these concerns in writing. On a related matter, we understand that the city arranged to have a meetin8 room available .to Mr. Previrl (Forecast) and we and our neighbor, in the 'donut hoJe' presumably so that Mr. Previti.can make another bid for our homes. The city should know that in a previous 'gr,'up meeting" In Mr. Prevltl's o[flce a few weeks ago, Mr. Previti appeared desirous of negotiatln8 with us and our fellow ne ghbors of the "donut hole" as a group. As we remember, he s.aldhe had only one million dollars to buy our houses and that we and our neighbors shou d dectde among ourselves how to split it up. It appeared to us as f Mr. Pre¥1ti wes throwin~ a bone onto the middle of his conference table and expecting us and our neighbors to fight over it like a pack of wild dogs. This was quite· humiliatin8 to us, although We hope to believe that this was eot Mr. Previti's intent. In this regard, we think it was a very bad idea that the city provide city facilities :to facilitate Forecast's "group negotiation" On Wednesday night, such action by the city can only be mistakenly interpreted by the community ?hat the city is involved in the 'bOne throwing" or, tossing crumbs 1O the "donut hole' homeowners, as well. Therefore, and for your Information, we have informed Forecast that we will only negotiate with him in private and not with our neighbors (or city staff.present and that we believe that our other neighbors should ge! the same courtesy of "confldentiality'~ that we seek). n conclusion, we th nk the city was preViously movln8 Ioo quickly or~ this project up until its planned January 9, 2002 Planning Camm ssion meet n8. Fortunate y0 this item wes pulled from ~'he agenda at the January 9 meetin8 and the planned final vole of approval did not occur, We: request that more public hearings and mee!ings and or forums will be held Io Insure that any final vote by the Planning Commission is fa,r and reasonable to all parties. Finally, you should knOw that Don Glover;s family has owned his homeslte for over 100 years and Joe Ruslin8 has lived in his home for many Ion8 Years. Don Glove' .. cc: City planning Commission Pa~e 2 TO: Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Tracy Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Project: Etiwanda Apartments/DRC 2OO1-00557 Initial Study: Proposed Negative Declaration January 9, 2002 Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am greatly disturbed by the recommended negative declaration proposed by staff for the above referenced project. I believe that the city's Contract Environmental Analyst overlooked several key issues: Issue 1. Land Use Planning. (a) The consultant maintains that there is Uno impact" in regard to issue 1 (Land Use & Planning) on the Environmental Checklist. Specifically, no impact is recorded for the following items: (b) conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. (c) be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity. (d) disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. In regard to item (b), the project does conflict with an established city planning policy that projects should not be distorted and piecemeal. The city should have required that the "hole in the donut" be acquired before this disjointed development be approved. In regard to item (c), this project is not compatible with existing land uses in that it virtually surrounds nine residential homes on eight lots. My home (lot 23) and my neighbor Joe Rusling (lot 22), are surrounded on three sides by this development. In regard to item (d), t evelopment will significantly ~d,s tn or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The continuity of single family homes along Etiwanda Avenue is being disrupted by placing this high-density development between our single family homes and the single family homes to the north on Etiwanda Avenue, some of which are historic. Additionally, the perceived access to our homes from Etiwanda Avenue is virtually eliminated, forcing residents to drive through a high density apartment complex with no indication from Etiwanda that there are privately owned homes surrounded by this development. The consultant views this issue in terms of building height compatibility, rather than as a density and access issue. Issue 3: Geological Problems. The consultant maintains that there is no impact in regard to item (e), landslides and mudflows, and a potentially significant impact for item (f), erosion, change in topography, etc., unless mitigated. In regard to item e (landslides or mudflows) we believe that possible impacts may result to lots 20.and 23 (the hole in the donut) because it appears that these lots are at a lower level than the proposed development. Regardless, there is no evidence of any engineering study addressing this impact on any of the residential lots. In regard to item f.(erosion, change in topography, etc) the consultant makes no reference to the impact on the "donut lotsn and how any potential impact would be mitigated. Issue 4: Water. Again, the consultant failed to consider the impact on the ~donut propertiesu in regard to all issues here. Because of the possible adverse impact in regard to the "donut propertiesu, the applicant should prepare a storm drainage study to the engineering division addressing the impacts on the above referenced property and the overall area before this project is approved. We understood that this is the standard policy for large scale proiects. The environmental consultant should have this study available before making any findings here. Issue 6: Transportation/Circulation. The consultant did not address the transportation and circulation issues on the "donut properties". In particular, the consultant states that there is no impact in regard to item (c), "inadequate emergency access or access to nearby usesn. However, there is no discussion about emergency access/egress plans for the "donut properties~. Additionally, the consultant maintains that there is no impact in regard to item (e) "hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists". Specifically, the Udonut properties" are Uwalled-in" along the property their lines with no access to sidewalks or surrounding internal streets (except disputed limited easements). Issue 13: Aesthetics. The consultant says there is no impact in regard to the above. I disagree. (I) the architectural character of the development is not consistent with the architectural character of the "donut properties". (2) My property, and the others, is being surrounded by an eight-foot high block wall, right on the property line, with no landscape setbacks as often is required by the city so as to aesthetically protect adjacent properties affected. Issues Not Addressed by Consultant. The consultant did not address the following: a) Economic Impact. The Economic Impact on the Value of Donut Homes surrounded by Development was not addressed. How much will the value of the homes go down? b) Impact of Construction On UDonut Homesu. In particular, 1) interrupted access to donut homes, 2) breakage of existing utilities to homes, 3) construction site hazard protection during grading & excavation, 4) security, 5)interruption of mail delivery, 6) mitigation measures for dust and noise, and 7)interim drainage measures to protect donut homes from water drainage, during grading operations. c) Existin~ Utilities to onut Homes . Can these utilities be integrated into proposed development at a later date, if any of these properties are redeveloped? Can future development on the donut lots "plug into" the proposed development's utility system as to facilitate the permissible level of apartment development? d) Alternative Buildin~ Plan Consistent with Surroundin~ Single Family, One-Sto~ Homes. - Impact of one-story development vs. two-sto~ development not addressed. Also, sinsle family homes are bein8 eliminated, discourasin8 the traditional home ownership pattern for the area. Was condominium development, rather than rental housin~ investisated as a better way to provide for the needs of the community? e) Legal Issues. Outstandin8 issues remain unaddressed about both existin8 easements and ~prescriptive easements." ~y family and my neishbor, Joe Ruslin~ believe that we have possible prescriptive easement rishts that the city may not have taken nto consideration. My Conclusions: This initial study is woefully inadequate. It does not address the above stated issues raised. A negative declaration is far to premature here. I request that no vote be taken on this project until the following occurs: 1. The city consultant addresses these issues in writin8. 2. The affected property owners have a public meeting with the city, consultant and developer in regard to the above. 3. Proper mitigation measures are put in place to protect the 'donut properties~ surrounded by this development. I understand via my conversations with legal & environmental consultants that the city must, by law, address in writin8 our questions and responses to the city environmental consultant's report, before you vote on this project. Additionally, we must also insist on a public forum on these issues before any action is taken. Sincerely, ~ ~,I.,.,. CONCEPTUAL , MASTER PLAN )' ETIWANDA AVE.t FORECAST HOMES Jan~uu'y 16, 2002 IDon Olover 7954 Etiwanda AventM Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 R~: FORECAST HOME,~ £'FIWA~I)A APART~Ni~ ]~ROJECF. ~. OIo~: On ~hgf of Fo~st Hom~ I ~o~d like ~o ~ you f~ yo~ ~ll~s ~ resol~ ~ iss~s ~olvin~ o~ pro~scd a~t development. Ho~v~, I f~ ~at Forc~st ~ ~ g~-~ ~e a c~ncd cffon m a~g yo~ pro~, ~d bye p~scn~ ~ we ~c prep~ to offer. At ~ ~e, we ~e ~ble ~ ~ nego~ ~ ac~isi~on of yo~ pro~; ~ I fc~l. we ~11 ~ ~s~Hy ~lvc &e dis~W be~een whal we ~ wil~ ~o off~ ~d yo~ ~ pdt, We ~lcome yo~ ~ ~]vc~nl ~ ~ici~tion i~ ~c ~velopment pr~s, as w~ ~v, ~hed~ a Co~F Mcct~, 2~u~ 17~ Tg-Co~fi~ Roem, C~ of ~ho Cuc~on~ for such p~o~ I app~cie~ yo~ ~ ~ acgve ~t~ in ~s m~. .qinccrcly, Ji~" vi.'i Area M~ager Forccas~ Home~ 3536 Coa¢om~ Srree{ Suite 100 · Ontazlo, CA 91764 · Phone 909.~.83.7320' F~x 909.9~0.1169 www. fofTc s~t homes.cam Kirt Coury, Associate Planner Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Undersigned Neighbors Surrounded by the "Donut Project~£~?£/[/£ PROJECT: Etiwanda Apartments RE: January 17, 2002 Meeting Forecast Homes at City Hall We, the undersigned, strongly object to the above referenced meeting. We understand that the purpose of.the meeting, according to the city, is for the "developer and residents to work out their differences" and that a "city representative will be available to answer technical questions". This meeting has no agenda and was not publicly noticed. If this meeting was intended to be another meelin8 between Forecast (the developer) and the affected residents of the ~donut project' for the purpose of allowing Forecast to "collectivelyn negotiate with our fellow neighbors over the acquisition of our homes, we strongly object. We insist on our right to individual "confidentiality' in any negotiation and refuse to be pitted against our neighbors in dividing up the limited total amount Forecast may be willing to pay. However, if the purpose of the meetin8 was to work out a "deal" with the developer as to how he should develop his property, we likewise object because this would be usurpin8 the authority of the plannin8 commission and the "right of the public to know". In either case. please be advised that the undersigned in good conscience can not attend the January_ 17. 2002 meeting. However, we da request that the city hold additional public meetings ancVor public forums on the following: (1) Whether this project is the appropriate design f..or the nei8hborhood, includin8 the Issues of apartments vs. the benefit of home ownership (like a one-story condominium development); Page 1, or'2 (2) The proposed negative declaration by the city consultant on this project {we believe the current study and determination is woefully inadequate and public environmental study "scoping" meetings with the city consultant are necessary); and, (3) "conditions of approval~ thai may be placed on this project to protect to protect our quality of life if we elect to remain or, if we are forced to move out, protect the development potential of our properties. We appreciate your understanding in these matters and hope you will consider the above requests. ~ - ' ~ddress Address Name ,~d~lress Name Address Page 2 of 2 TO: Brad Bullet, Cily Planner DATE: January 16, 2002 Jack Lam, City Manaser Jim Markman, City Attorney City of Rancho Cucam°nsa FR: Don Glover - 7gS4 Etlwanda Ave, Rancho Cucamon~,a Joe Ruslln8 - 12837 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonsa _,,~t ~ PROJECT: Eitwanda Apartments - Forecasl Homes~u',' ' RE: January 17, 2002 Meetin8 Dear Sirs: I received a let?er In my mall box on January 15, 2003 in resard to the above referenced meeting. Kirt Coury, Associate Planner with the City, called me the evenln8 of January 15, 2002 to remind me about the meetin8. He said the purpose of the meetin8 wes for the developer and the residents surrounded on three sides of this development {referred to as the 'donut hole' proje~) to "work out their differences' and that 'a city representative would be there to answer lechnical questions First, if this is a meetin8 for Previti to nesotiate for the purchase of elaht houses in a 'collective" settln8 with all the affected 'donut hole' residents present, es he has previously attempted to do, then this is hishly unacceplable to us. As we pointed out to all of you In our letter of January 15, 2002 (copy enclosed), we believe that It is our ril~ht, as well as that of the other hole" homeowners) ro have 'confidentially' in any ne&,otlatlons with Mr. I~eviti. As a side nora, we did send a le~ler ro Mr. Prevlll on January 15, 2002 requestin~ to nesotJate with him for lhe purchase of our properlies with the condition o~ confldenliality; Mr. PrevJtJ ~urned down our offer tn his letter dated January 16, 2002. Our leller Io Mr. PrevitJ and his loller of response to us is atlached. Second, if the purpose of this mee~in8 is for ~he develope~ (Forecasr) and the "donut hole~ homeowners to privately hammer out or nesotlete conditions of approval amor~ ourselves, then we think this Is hi&,hly unusual. Our understanding, Is that I1' Is for the Plannin8 Commission, attar receipt of written recommendations from the plannJn8 staff, to decide on the merits of approvln8 this Project' and what condition of approvals should be placed on this Project. A "city staff representative standln8 by to answer technical questions': while the developer and the 'donut hole~ residents 'resolve our differences sounds like a "back room" deal; we would assume that ~ Plannin8 Commissioners would strongly disapprove of such back rotan agreements that usurp their authorJty: In any event, we have already wrirlen e letter to the Ple.~n~n8 Commiss:on, dated January g, 2002, outlinin8 the conditions of approval thal we believe should be imposed on this Proiec! before its approval. Tl~at letter was intended to. be read at the Plannln8 Commission's January g, 2002 meeting; but this Project was pulled from the agenda so we delivered the letter ?he next day to The Planning Department. As of the wri:in8 of this letter, we have no~ received any response from the City regarding our letter dated January 9, 2002. In conclusion, this January 17, 2002 meetin8 appears to have no agenda. We can oni¥ assume that the purpose for Jt Js either 1) to facilitate Forecast's ability to negotiate 'collectively' with the ~donut hole~ homeowners without our respective rights to °ccnfident~allty" or 2) to "work out a back room agreement between the developer and the 'donut hole" homeowners Jn reg,~rd to conditions of approval. Again, this we believe is tantamount to back room negotiations that usurp the authority ot' the Planning Commission and the right of the public to know. In either case, we feel that it would be inappropriate ro~ us to ~ttend this ill advised private meeting being held at City Hall. However, we would be quite happy to attend a publicly noticed meetin8 for design review and technical review meetings where we can voice our concerns and present oul c,~se for our ~prol~osed conditions of approval~ (es outlined Jr~ the Don Glover & Joe Ruslin~ lette~ of January 9, 2002) m representatives of the Planning Commission; the developer would presumably have ~he same opportunity.here to present ~is case, Secondly, we again urge the City to hold e pub c m~et n~ or forum on the e~Vlronmental survey & Proposecl Negative declaration ~or the Froject by the ~:ity consultant; as stared in Trecy Glover's letter of January g, 2002 on the p~:~P°sed n?~atlve declaration, we believe thai serious issues remain unansweredand must oe a'ddressed In separate public hearings before fhJs project can be voted on by the Planning Commission. Finally, v~ are ready Io meet with Staff or participate in a public forum to clarify our letters teg.~rdln8 'conditions of approval" and file proposed Negative Deciarallon. We will aisci;be ~,~1~;~, ~o :lebate the developer in. this regard if ~he city so desires, in a public forum that is publicly noticed. Please call Don O!over at ~0~.463-6081 if you have any questions. ~on ~wer ~ Rusl;¢~ RE' MHtln8 of JAnu~ 17. Deer Jimmy: Thenk you for your invitation f~ a Broup meetin8 on Thursday, Janu~ 17. Hoover. Don is oul o~ to~. ~ & Don can m~t with ~u pdwtely the followi~ wee~ the ~ek of Janua~ 20, in lhe e~ning. HooVer, ~ want any n~otlatt~s rtsardin8 ~e acquisition of our pr~erty to be strictly confidential in resard 1o the substence of our m~tln~ any terms discussed and the pe~le involved i~ the n~oflaflons. J~ & D~, ancot our r ......ntative ~11 meat w th you to consider the sale of ou~ joint prope~tes as a ~8e. If this Is acceptable to you, please let ~ ~ efa t~me and ~eting pl~e for ~ ~ek of Janua~ 20 we do ~t want lo meat al if ~u agr~ fo ou,' ~eslm ~ confidentiality, p~a~ initial or s~n ~is time you wllh to mit I ho~e yOU Ufid~'~r~ meetinss. Althoush ~ are sure ~ was net your ntent, i~ appeared to us end ~r nelShb~l thal you ~r~ ~hrowln8 a be~ ~ ~ teb~e with · o~ millien ~llar price ta8 and ~pe~ us and cur ne',ghbors ~ fl~h~ o~ it li~ wild ~. Rememb~ ~t you did ~y at our m~tin& ~r~ ~ to ~e~ a~ lna~ u~deas~and our cor~cern for confidentiality I1~ a~y negotiations - not just for ~u~ f,-x ~r nelshbors, as well. Sl~erely. TO: Jack Lam, C!h.~a~,. r C',~t~- ~..~l~ry, lS, Brad Buller, City Planner Jim Marian, Cit? c~y of ~a~cho FROM: i~on & Tracy G~owr 7~54 ~tlwand~ A~-en~, ~a~cho C~an,~nga J~ Rus~ing SUBJECT: Request for Public Head~:8 on ~n~[roumental Issues R~ardln8 tha gtiwan~ Apartments Proj~t ~he 'Don~ Deer Sirs: Tra~ Glover submitted the attached letter commentJn8 on the Negative ~cl~al~on prepared by the City Consultant in ~8erd to lhe eb~e referenced proj~. This was Io be presen~ at ~he PlannJn8 Commission ~lng of Janua~ g on this project but this proj~t was pulled from ~ agenda. As can be seen from the attached letter, ~ belie~ ~ negative ~clarat~ was ~emamre ~nd that t~ consultant's review of the issues Is woefully I~omplete. Fur~herm~e, because of ~he impact that the ~ve developmenL re~erred to by cl~ staff as the '~ut Pro,ct', has on our homes and our nelgh~rs lying In ~he 'whole of the donut', a public hearing should b~ held ~v~tJt ~he city co~su~ant to solicll q~st~on~ and comments and 'm b~Jttm ~ sco~ of ~he environmental analysis, This was ~t ~. In he~ fe~er, Tracy has prepared ~mments a~ raised questions ebou~ the cittas envJronr, qentel consuItant'~ ~porl Tht.,~ e,u~s s~c~:.ld be address~ In wrlli~ en~hin8 else h~ppens on th~s ~ ~r~t. A~d;r~on~;;y,, pubiic meet,n8 or ~e,ru~t, ,h~ld be held te bdef =nd solici~ queslJons and commen~ from our r,~ig~rs; the~ q~stions and carn~,en~s shou~ ~en al~ be answe~d in ~t~n8. It is our underst~ndin8 that state I~w required, public meeting and public input on p~oj~s of ~h~s magnitude ~fore they are approved and that the public is entitled to haw t~,~r questions · nd ¢~ents answered In writin8. T~erefc, re, we ~lleve 1hat any Planning Commission vote at t~ newly rescheduled meetin8 of J~nua~ 23, 2~2 ts greatly premature. At best, ~i~ ~iin8 sh~ be ~ publicly ~ting on lhe consultants environmental rep~ ~n ~h~ t~e p~lic can ,~k questions ~ ...... Th~s ~ ........ ........... ,,~,,,a. s,~o~d be ~llowea oy Io IOW-Up meellngs In which ~he consultant ,~ddres~s the communit~s co~erns and subsequently answers these concerto in ~itin~, On e related mat~c:, we u~'~'r~a~ ;~.~, the city ~rr~e~ to h,~,~ ~-~ml~e~tti~,8 ro~>m eveiJab~ fo Mr. Previti (Forecast) ~d we a~d ouF ne:~'~s in fire 'donut hdc' presurneb~- so that Mr. ~eviti can make ~,,~r bid f~ ~,r h~. ~'he ~tv should k~, the~ in ~ ~re~6~ "grip meeting" In Mr~ Pr~vi=i's ~ffi¢=, f~,~ wee~s ~go, ~, P~'evit~ ap~at~ ~.~sl~us :~f negotiating with us =nd ~r fellow ~eig~=~':~ of the "~::~ut hoi~~ as = gr~. As k~;e r~en~ber, he said h= had only one m~llton du~lars to buy our ~uses m~d =h=t we ~d ~r ~ighbe~ s~ould d~de among our~lves..ow~ ,4, ,~.l.t--~." ,~-~-,.. It ap~red. . :'o us as .f ~r ~e¢~t~ w~s throwin8 a b~e onto the middle of his c~nf=re~ce ',~>ie e~ e~ne<t}~ us e~J ~r ~;e~h~ori :o Fight o~r it lik~ a pack of wild d:=~s. Th~= was quite hum~:tin~ to u~.. ~lthough we ho~ tc~ ~,el'=~e that th.s was ~ot Mr, Pre~i's init, at. In this r~ard, we ~h~ ~ w-e~ a ve~ b,d ~J~ that ?~e ':~- · := ' ' ' Forecasrs "Doup ne~tiet~on' on Wed~sdey night; such action by the city can only be mistakenly ~nterpF~t~ by the communi~ that the city is Involved In f~ "bone throwing' ~, tossin~ ¢rc~Al~ ?c, the 'd~ut ho~" Kom~v~nets, ~ well. Theref~e, and f~ your information, we have informed Fore, st that we will only negotiate with him In private and not with ~r ~ei~hb~s (or oily staff present and that we be~e~ ~,t our ol~ neighb~s should ~f fha same c~rtesy of "confidentially' that ~ see~. In conclusion, we think the city was previously movin~ t~ qulck~ on this proj~t up until its planned Janua~ 9, 2~2 Plannin~ Commission ~eetl~. Fortunately, this item was pull~ from the e~de et the Jenugry 9 meetin~ end t~ planned final vote of approval did ~t ~cur. We Fequest that more public hearings nnd ~etings and or f~ums will be held to ins~e that any f~ne[ vote by the Plannin~ Commission Is fei, end reasonable to all patios. Finally, you should know fhet ~n Giver's family h~ owed his ~site for o~ ~ ~ers ~n~ Joe Rus!in~ h~s li~ in his ~e for many ~n~ years. Sincerely, Tracy Glover Joe Rb.~ IIl',g cc: Cit.~' P!nnnir~g Page 2 0~'2 JAN-l?-02 68:29~ FROI/~-FORECA~I/E$ $OC~I. 90048373Sl T-lOg P.O1/OI F-'411 FORECAST HOMES Iaaua~ 17, 200? ~ eom3, 10500 Civic Cemer Dr. P.O. Box 807 ~o Cuc~ong~ ~ 91729 , WJ'ruo~w~ OFP~c~No. 227-211-017 ~M O~c~ Ptc~G~ ~ ~ SUB 1G~, ~. Co~, ~ a ~ of co~, 1 wo~ lie m m~ ~ og~i~ sub.don q~sgo~ pl~ c~ ~ ~ 90~ 1-81 ~. 3536 Concouts S~eelc Su~ze 100 * Ontu~:~, CA 91764 · Phone 909.483.7320 - Fnx 909.980.1169 THE CITY OF [~A N C ]~ O CIJCAMONCA Report DA[E: January 9, 2002 T~. Chairman and Members of the Planning*Commission FROI~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26.7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Oveday District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distdct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Oveday District, and Etiwanda Avenue Oveday Distdct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard- APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 13.8 dwelling units per acre B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - 1-15 Freeway South - Community Commercial East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per'acre)/Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West 1-15 Freeway PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST HOMES January 9,2002 Page 2 C, General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - 1-15 Freeway South - Community Commercial East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre West 1-15 Freeway D. Site Characteristics: The property is generally flat, sloping downward to the south and east. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present, Eight existing single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed project, E. Parkin~ Calculations: Multi-Family/Condominium Residential Type Number Parking Number of Number of .of Use of Units Ratio Spaces Spaces Required Provided One Bedroom 158 1.50/unit 237 Two Bedroom 188 1.80/unit 339 Three Bedroom 22 2.00/unit 44 Guest Parking 0.2S/unit 92 Total 712 719 ANALYSIS: A. General: The project is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, which requires a Conditional Use Permit to develop except for single-family homes. The project density of 13.8 dwelling units per acre is essentially at the top of the density range for this zone; therefore, transition of density to adjoining single-family homes is critical. The Site Plan has been designed to create transitions through building orientation and setbacks to the identified single-family residences. The project includes a total of 41 apartment buildings comprised of four building types. In addition, two recreation buildings with one office/leasing building are included in the proposed project. The proposed buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue have enhanced elevations and the building masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing. There are 19 two-story apartment buildings proposed along the freeway corddor at the north and west project perimeter. The buildings are plotted to assist with the mitigation of freeway noise. Single- story garage structures per~orm as a good buffer and Iow building mass transition along the south property line, adjacent to the commercial property. A substantial recreation/open space corddor is provided within the development, which will include both active and passive recreation facilities. Active recreation uses include a community pool and spa, several tot lots, half court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, barbecue areas, and exercise facilities within the recreation building. The buildings will include a stucco finish, painted wood knee braces, ledge-stone battered walls, and a concrete fiat tile roof. The project perimeter will involve 6-foot high tubular steel fencing and split face masonry wall. Fencing along Etiwanda Avenue will include tubular steel fencing with decorative native stone pilasters. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUB'I-r16257 & DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST HOMES January9,2002 Page 3 B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project on November 20, and December 4, 2001. At the December 4, 2001, meeting, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project, subject to the applicant's providing stone wainscot treatment on all sides of the buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue. It should be noted that the applicant has provided the wainscot treatment to the front and side elevations, but not to the rear. The applicant met with the City Planner on January 2, 2002, to consider other options to resolve the matter. Action comments from the Design Review Committee have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit I). The City Planner will continue to work with the applicant end hopes to bring a recommended solution to the Planning Commission on the use of native rock on the buildings facing Etiwanda Avenue. C. GradinR Review and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on November 20, 2001. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on November 21, 2001. Both Committees recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval. D. Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567: Several mature trees exist throughout the project site. The only other plant materials are annual and perennial weeds and grasses. Several of the mature trees that occur on-site must be removed to allow for the proposed construction. The trees are subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 276. The impact is not considered significant due to the project design which includes planting numerous box size trees E. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on November 20, 2001. Twelve people attended the meeting, which included property owners of the single-family residences, located on the inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the project site. The residents asked questions and raised concerns regarding traffic, access, drainage, maintaining a single-family quality of life and neighborhood in the middle of an apartment project, and the potential negative impacts to the property values of the single- family homes. The developer presented the project regarding site design, building orientation, parking, access and landscaping to address several of the identified concems. The nearest building to the L-shaped property is 32 feet from their common property line. F. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study has been prepared. Staff determined that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact through short-term air quality impacts during site preparation such as grading and equipment exhaust. Staff also determined that there may be noise impacts to future residents within the subject development resulting from traffic along the 1-15 freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, as well as biological impacts resulting from on-site tree removal. A noise study was prepared which identified noise attenuation measures. The project design clevedy uses buildings along the west boundary as the sound attenuation barrier;, hence, no sound wall is necessary along the 115 Freeway. Special sound attenuation design will be necessary for those units facing Etiwanda Avenue. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality and predicted future noise impacts to a less than significant impact and trees are required to be replaced pursuant to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 276. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners · within a 300-foot radius of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST HOMES January9,2002 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet · City Planner BB:KC~Is Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Location Map Exhibit "B"- Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C"- Tentative Tract Map 16257 Exhibit "D"- Site Plan Exhibit "E"- Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "G"- Elevations Exhibit "H"- Floor Plans Exhibit "1" -Design Review Committee Minutes, Dated November 20, and December 4, 2001 Exhibit "J" - Environmental Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 LOCATION MAP SUB'nH 62571DRC2001..00557 ~0'~0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 4800 Feet IIIIIIII I ' I ~ CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, SITE UTILIZATION CAMINO RE~L II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16257 DETAFt,ED SITE PLAN ETIWANDA APARTlvIENTS -.~.,.,~."'~' APPLICATION FOR CITY OF P.~NCHO CUCAMONOA, CA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW & FORECAST GROUP TF-~ITATIVE MAP ~ .. .. ...... .l.. ~. ,, , ~ ~ ',', . · . . .. ~ /// /' ? // / / CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, CONCEPTUAL GRADIN(~ PLAN ~.~.. ~" ~ ~ SOUTHERLY PORTION ~ ~ DET~ SHEET 4ASTER PLAlq ETIWANDA .,,,. ~*wo,~A.~ ETIWANDA APARTMENTS//2 (~...... '~m"*' ETIWA~DA APAR~$ FRONT ELEVATION LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION I~'RONT I!LL~ATION FRONT ELEVATION LEFr I~.RVATION C. tI. IFO~.V~,~ ~V~.~OW RIGHT ELEVATION 0~ ET~WA~D^~P~RTMENT~ · · - ~ FR. ONT ELEVATION ~.~~ REAR. ELEVATION ~ & RIGHT ELEVATION c:~ ET1WANDA APARTMENTS ' ~ LEAg[NG BIIf[.f)ING CLUBI-IOUgR ADULT (2OMIts,? (~ENTE~R. ~ ET1WANDA APARTMENTS ~ 1t2 m .Cl. ~. ETIWAND^ APARTMENTS ' ~ ETI'WANDA APARTMENT8 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS SECOND FLOOR ...... : ........ ~' ..... LOFt LEV~ ~ ~TiWA_NDA ~~S ~ FRONT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION , , ~: r I // '~'/~ ~ [ ~' / /,,~ " x,, 5-CAR GARAGE W/H.C. ACCESS 4-CAR GARAGE W/MAINTE~IANcE FRONT 1~ .~/AT1ON FRONT ELEVATION 10-CAR GARAGE S-CAR GARAGE ETIW~FDA AP~R'TMENT~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 11:00 a.m. Kirt CouP/ November 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTI' 16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium ReSidential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 0g, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the ' Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Dis~ct, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 0g, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUB'iq' 16257, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Pem-~t DRC2001-00567. Desiqn Parameters: The site is located between Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard. The lot is generally fiat, sloping downward to the south and east. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present. Eight existing single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped properly at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed project. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development. To the west and north iS the 1-15 Freeway. To the east across Efiwanda Avenue, is the approved, but not yet built, Camino Real Apartments by this same developer. The project density of-13.8 dwelling units Per acrei~'is essentially at the top o[ the density range for this zone;therefore, transition of densily to adjoining single,family homes is critical..-Site Plan has been designed to create transitions through building orientation and setbacks to b'3e,identified single- family residences. The project will include a total of 41 apartment buildings comprised of four ~ bbilding lypes. In a. ddition~ there Will also be two recreation buildings wilh one office/leasing bui!dlng. The proposed bud ngs fronting Etiwanda Avenue :have,enhanced elevaflons~and;~ bU Idirtg masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing. 'There are 19 two- story apartment buildings proposed along =the freeway corridor at the nor;th and wast ~proJect perimeter. The buildings are intended to assist with the mitigation of freeway n0tse., Single-stet7 garage structures perform as a good buffer and Iow building mass transition ,along the south property line, adjacent to the commerdal property. The project will require a Variance to allow for the increase in the wall height up to 25 feet for sound attenuation along the 1-15 Freeway. A substantial racreat{.on/open space corridor is provided within the d.evelopme?t~ which wiJl include both active and passive recreation facilities. Active recreatiori Lfses inblba~=a.~m~uditY pool and spa; several tot lots. half court basketball, grass volleyball c~rt, ho~rseshoe p~ barbecue areas, and exercise facilities within the recreation buildings. Th6 j~)roP0'~d bbildir~s Will includ~ '~ stu~ finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, and a concrete flat tile roof. The projeqt perimeter Will involve 6-foot high tubular steel fencing and a masonry wall. Fencing along Etiwanda Avenue'will lnclude 6-fo0t high tubula~ steel [en~ng ~ith deco~ve masonry pila, stem. DRC COMMENTS TT SUBTT16257 AND DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION November 20, 2001 Page 2 Requlations: the Etiwanda Specific Plan only allows the proposed density under the Optional Development Standards. The key requirement is a minimum of 30 percent common open space. The project site's· frontage, within 200 feet of the street centedine, is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Oveday District. The Oveday District is intended "to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings." The key requirement is for multi-family structures to be designed "to present an:image of large Single-family structures." River rock is encouraged as a design element. A minimum of 15 recreational amenities is required based upon the total number of units. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues,: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Roof style and materials of the apartment buildings and garage structures should match. 2. Incorporate design elements of the proposed buildings into the architecture of the garage structures (i.e., gable roof element, stucco finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, etc.). 3.. All walls and fences shall be of decorative mate~l. 4. Two of the proposed elevations should incorporate decorative materials other than wood siding to provide variation in the buildings. For example, Buildings B and D could Include stacked stone or real river rock trealment. 6. '~ '.:The decorative perimeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large decomlive masonry pilasters (I.e,-real river rock or stacked stone) in ils design. The pilasters shall be · develoPedat,a minimum of 30:~inchessquarad;. Pohcy Issues. The following ~ltams are a. matter, of. Planning Comm~ssion POlicy and should be incoi'porated into the project design without,discussion: 1. Vary the mil-Up garage door designs to avoid monotony. Suggest pairing together doors wtlh Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to the modifications as recommended above. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Member Present Pa~ 8~wart, Nancy Fong ' The Committee reviewed the pr6j a :and re mmer{a6d ~e apPlicant ~ke all major and policy issue revisions, with the exception of the fourth identified major Issue. The revision should incorporate decorative material other than wood siding and could include stacked stone or real river rock treatment on the four buildings along Etiwanda Avenue as well as the leasing/clubhouse building. The applicant agreed to make the necessary revisions and bring back the revised elevations and sample materials. The Committee asked to see the project on Consent Calendar at the next Design Review Committee meeting. · .~.. ~ CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS~t 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury December 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAl. USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distdct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda horth of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUB'FI' 16257, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Para Stewart Staff Planner:. Nancy Fong for Kirt CouPJ The applicant was not present at the meeting with the revised colored elevations. The Committee reviewed the faxed 8 1/2 by 11 elevations showing the addition of stacked stones enrichment to . Buildings B and C. The Committee recommended that the stacked stones be used as a wainscot for all sides of the buildings and to bring the stacked stones up to the level of the cornice treatment and as marked on the faxed elevations. If the applicant disagreed with the Committee's recommendations, the project should be referred back to Committee as a regular item for discussion prior to Planning Commission review. ~i~, ENVIRONMENTAL ; ~' ~' '~¥ INFORMATION FORM c~o,..~c,.,.~ (Part I -' Initial Study) ~nning D~ (909) 4~ I~laellneS I~0 ~leme INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED, Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to pedorm work required to provide missitlg information. Applicab'on Number for the project to which this form pertains: Name & Address of developer or project spon~oc 75. Telephone 7 / InfurmaUon indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non.construc#on CUP.~s unless otherwise requested by staff. 'I) Provide a full scale (8-I/2 x f 1) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the ~ bounda~te& 2) Provide s set of color photographs which show repmsentaUve views into the site from the north, ~, east and we~ views into and from the site from the p#mery access points which senra the site; and repmsentetive views of significant features from the site. Include · map showing IocaUon of each photograph. *5) Gmss Site Arae (ac/sq. fL ): -~,~ Net Site Ama (total site size minus ares of public s~eete & proposed dedications): 7)Describe any propose~ general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (affach addi#onal sheet ff necessa~y: / ~-~m ANNiN~FiNAL~FORMS~COUNTER~INITSTDI.WPD 3/00 Page 2 " 8) include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmental agencies in order to fully implement the preject: / 9)Describe the physical seffing of the site as it 'exists before the project including informs§on on topography, soil stablTfly, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, end scenic aspects. Descdbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structure& Attach photographs of significant~ feature's' described. In addffJon, site all souYces of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological sunrays, baltic studies): ,,~ xt,,,,t t.l.,. ,~,..,.-4-.~, ~l."["e. '"~'"'~,~.,.¢ ' '" ~ 1 O) Descdbe the known cuttuml ancYor historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): 11)Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the Site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: 12)Describe the prcposedpreject in detail. This shouldprovide an adequate deacdp§on of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from (he prop. osed prejecL Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development fo occur with each phase, and the anticipated compietion of each incremenL' Attach additional sheet(s) ff necessary: 13)Describe the surrounding prope~ss, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, hisfotfcal, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (msidentlal, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height. frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): I I ' f 4) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? 15) Indicate the type of short-term and icng-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How w~ll these noise levels affect adjacent properb'es and on-$ite use$. What rnethoda of seund proofing ara proposed? · 16)lndicatepmposedmmovalsand/orraplacementeofm~tureorscenictmes: ~¥'~1 '~'-~V~o~--~ 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the si~ drains: 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Affachment A for usage es~mates). For fud~her ctatffica~;, please contecf the Cucamonge County Wator Diabfct st §87-25~f. a. Residen#al (gaYday) ~ ~ ~'~ ~ 0 0 Peek use (gaYDay) b. CommelciaYlnd. (gal~day/ac), Peak use (gal/roi.n/ac) / 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. __ Septic Tank JSewer. If septic tenk8 ere proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitety sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generaticu~: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfurther clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Disbfct at 987- 2591. e. Residential(gel~day) -~ ~ 0 b. Commen:ial/Ind. (gaYday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: · ' 20) Number of residential unlt~' Detached (indicate range of paroel sizes, minimum lot ~Jze and maximum lot size: 21)Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rants: Sale Prfce(s) $. ' to $ Rent (per month) $ ~ o ~ to $ /' ~ ~'~-'-' 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit lype: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit fype: 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contacf the appropde~e Scho~ Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary. b. Junior High: __ SeniorHigh COMMERClAL~ INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT~ 25) Desc#be type of use(s) and major func~on($) of commercial, ~.,~1=1 ~,I~IMIId~,I='INAI ~FORMS~,OUNTER~JNITSTDI.V~=,D 3/00 Page 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of Total: employees: Maximum Shift.* Time of Maximum ShifE 29)Provide breakdown ¥ ranges, aa well as an indicaUon of the r~te of hire for each classification 30) Estimation of the. to be ' reside in the '31)Fo~ ~, typ~ of air polluttor, (Data ahould be h CoastAir ¢ ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, aewer, conbol agencies aerving b~e project been contacted to determine ~heir ability to provide adequate sen/ica to the If ~o, please indicate their reapon~e. ~tPLANNING~FINAL~ORMStCOUNTER~JNITSTD1.WPD 3/00 Page 7 33 In the known history of this propeK[y, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic roate~fals? ~ Exaroples of hazardous and/or toxic roatsdals include, but are not liroited to PCB. s; radioactive substances; pesticides end herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flaroroable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the roater~als and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, ff known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the teropora~y or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not liroited to those exaroples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such roatedals to be used and proposed roethod of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be ahown and labeled on the application plan& I hereby ce~ify that the statements furoisbed above and in the a~teched exhibifs present the da~a and infarma~:~n required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of roy knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information roay be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the C~. of Rancho Cucamonge. ,~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DRC 2001-00557 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No. 16257, DRC 2001-00567 and DRC 2001-0566 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 2001- 00557-The project is the development and design review of plans for Tentative Trect Map No. 16257, and the construction of 368 multi-family units in buildings ranging frem one to three stories in height. The site is approximately 26.7 acres in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project also requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Tree Removal Permit. The project site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. All proposed developments within the overlay district are subject to the issuance of a CUP with the exception of single-family residences. The Tree Removal Permit will allow the removal of onsite trees that meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees. Currently there are three single-family residences onsite. The proposed project includes the removal of these residences. The site is located southeast of the elevated 1-15 Freeway, appreximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN Nos.227-21-003, 004, 005, 009, 010, 017, 020 and 029). 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Forecast Corporefion 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. Zoning: Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is bordered on the west and north by the 1-15 Freeway. The freeway is elevated threugh this section and runs southwest to northeast at an approximate 45° angle to the site. The area south of the site is vacant followed by a realty office, a liquor store, single-family residences and a church (located near the southwest corner of the site). The site surreunds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences. These are not a part of the project and will remain in place. The project includes a perimeter wall around the existing residents. There are three single-family residences that occur onsite that will be removed to allow for site development. The westernmost portion of the site is currently clear of residential structures and will allow full access to the northern/southern portion of the site. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: State Water Resoumes Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' or 'Less Than Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ) Land Use and Planning ('/) Transportation/Circulation ~ (v') Biological Resources (v) Public Services ) Population and Housing ( ) Energy and Mineral Resoumes (,~') Utilities and Sen/ice Systems I v') Geological Problems (v') Aesthetics (v') Water (v') Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources (~') Air Quality (v') Noise (~') Mandatory Findings of Significance (v') Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluatior~: I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Natalie P. Patty //~/ ' Contract Environmental Analy'~t December 18, 2001 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ,o~t~/ ur,~ I 'man I I Signi~cant Uiligatl~l I Sigflili~att I NO I 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) vicinity?. d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') established community? Comments: a-b) The project site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and is bordered on the west/northwest by the 1-15 within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The project site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District and therefore is subject to a CUP and all special design requirements contained in Part II, Chapter 5, Section .304 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site is within the Medium Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per area). The applicant has proposed a tract map showing 13.8 dwelling units per acre on a net site area of 26.7 acres. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the project. c-d) The nearest residence is located 40 feet from a proposed building with a proposed height of 32 feet. Standard two-story homes have heights ranging from 25 to 35 feet. The proposed development will be compatible with existing residences in the vicinity as the building are sufficiently setback from the existing residences and do not exceed the maximum height requirements of a two-story single-family home. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~,~ u.~ 2. POPULATION ~ ~ Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) (.,-) population projections? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u,~ ~ I~c~qx~ated I In~act I ImpactI b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) directly or indirectly (e,g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) housing? Comments: a-b) The project includes the construction of 368 apartments on approximately 26.7 acres of land designated as Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per area) located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 100 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed. Therefore, the project will not result in a change in population projections. The proposed project will not require the exl~ansion of any major infrastructure as the area surrounding the site is development with scattered single-family residences, with commemial development along Foothill Boulevard. c) The project site includes three existing single-family residences. These residences will be removed to allow site development. The site surrounds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences. These eight residences are not apart of the project and will remain in place. The three residential structures that Occur onsite will be removed and replaced with 368 dwelling units. The impact is considered less than significant. Issues and Suppo[ting Informat on Sources: ! [ s~mc~t I M~gat~ No I ~m~oar~ I Inco~ed Iml~ 3. · GE~ ~ Would the proposal resu~ in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) FauU rapture? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (~) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (~) ( ) d) Seiche haza~s? ( ) ( ) ( ) (z) e) Landslides or mu~lo~? ( ) ( ) ( ) ~ Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) (~) ( ) ( ) conditions from ex~vation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) h) E~ansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: ~ u,~,. ~ i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) .Comments: a-b) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.8 miles north. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (Mw) 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 9.0 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhedng to the City grading standards and the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. c) In the absence of shallow groundwater, the project site is not considered susceptible to soil liquefaction. d) The 26.7-acre site is not located near a body of water. Therefore the proposed development will not expose people to a seiche hazard. e) The site is relatively flat, therefore there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. Grading will be minimal and will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) Based on a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared for the site by Converse Consultants in August 2001, the project site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the findings and conclusions presented in the report are considered in the development of the site. As discussed in the report, the upper three to four feet of alluvial soils are not considered suitable for supporting structures or additional fills. However, typically, during grading, these soils can be over excavated and compacted to meet or exceed foundation requirements. The following mitigation measures, as contained in the report, will ensure impacts to development of the site are less than significant. 1. Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils. Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnical report. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. g/h) Based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Converse Consultants in August 2001, two representative samples from the top layer of Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 7 alluvial deposit were tested to evaluate expansion index (El) in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1997) Standard 18-2. The value of the measured El is 0. This value of El indicates that the site soils have very low expansion potential. As discussed in the report, the average shrinkage factor for the upper five feet of alluvial soils is estimated to be 2 to 16 percent. Subsidence will depend on the construction methods including type of equipment utilized. For estimation purposes, ground subsidence may be taken as 0.20 feet. Subsidence may occur in the City relative to groundwater withdrawals, if groundwater drawn down is done at varying rates in the Cucamonga groundwater basin. However, to date this phenomenon has not occurred anywhere in the City and is unlikely to occur due to the consistent groundwater management practices of the various water agencies. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant. Soil type at the site and in the vicinity is Tujunga association (TvB). The Tujunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium. Soils are present at slopes of zero to nine percent in elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet. Vegetation present with these soils is thin strands of chamise, some large sagebrush, and annual grasses. Runoff is slow to very slow. The hazard of water erosion is slight, but the soil will blow if left unprotected. The hazard of soil blowing is moderate to high on bare soil. The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. s~acant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~,,~y L~.. ~ Imi~ot Inco~o*'at ed mpact mpact 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) (~') ( ) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) (,") ( ) ( ) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any' ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction . ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 8 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a-b) Based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM, 1984) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is located within a "Flood Hazard Zone C." This zone is defined by FEMA as an area of minimal flooding. As described in the Preliminary Drainage Study prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates the project site drains southerly to Foothill Boulevard, through the Foothill Market Place, and ultimately to the Day Creek Channel. The City's Master Plan of Drainage proposed to redirect this area easterly to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel. Interim conditions do not allow additional flows to the facility until downstream regional facilities are completed. In addition, the property is not physically capable of draining to the basin. A Final Drainage Report prepared for Tract 15711 (located north of the project site) in September 1997, provides for the redirection of the undeveloped runoff from this area, with mitigation detention occurring in Basin No. 6 to account for this increased undeveloped flow. The report suggests onsite detention of the incremental developed runoff from this area to occur as a potential option. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits: 3. The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stormwater will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's storm drain system. c-e) Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control .Board (SWRCB). The project will also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved reads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 9 A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant. f-i) The project will not intedere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Additionally, groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings (maximum explored depth of 50 feet) taken for the preparation of the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, prepared by Converse Consultants. Based on available information depth to groundwater is greater than 400 feet below the project site. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (,') ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (,') ( ) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. The cdteda pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO~), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM~o). Though not required, construction emissions ara screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed project, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks. The proposed project operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM~o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the project contribution to regional emission of criteda pollutants. Initial Study for .City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 10 Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM~0 and NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx. Tables 1 and 2 show project impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) will be generated. Additionally, painting activities will increase ROG levels. The model simulates all of the units being painted at the same time (worst case) and shows that combined ROG during construction to exceed the 75 pounds per day threshold by 1.68 pounds. However, it is likely that painting activities will be spaced out and will not occur at the same time. If painting activities do occur simultaneously Mitigation Measure No. 11 will ensure emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds. And since, there are existing residential units within the vicinity of the site, and since the region is in non-attainment for PM~0, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures: 5. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 6. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7. Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 8. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 9. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. During operation exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site will increase CO levels in the area. As shown in Table 2, operation activities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Based on a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Kunzman Associates in October 2001, the project will generate approximately 2,466 daily trips. Total AM peak hour trips would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour trips would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacity or 'better at intersections in the vicinity. Traffic associated with the project was projected to occur in the area as the area is designated Medium Residential and is expected to generate related traffic trips. Emissions essociated with these vehicle trips are below SCAOMD thresholds (Table 2). Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 11 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary 'Pounds per Day) Source ROG N(~x " CO PM~0 Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Demolition 16.80 16.80 Grading 4.67 4.67 53.22 50.56 25.36 10.99 Worker Trips 1.09 1.09 1.54 1.54 2.91 2.91 0.29 0.29 Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02 Mobile Equip. 3.12 2.96 28.80 27.36 2.23 2.12 Arch. Coatings 69.72 66.23 Asphalt 1.70 1.62 Totals 80.64 76.68 83.83 79.73 2.91 2.91 44.70 13.42 SCAQMDThres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significance Yes Yes No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions 'Pounds per Day) Source ROG N(~x " CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Area Source 0.06 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 10.16 10.16 20.29 20.29 90.46 90.46 5.16 5.16 Totals 10.22 10.16 21.10 20.29 90.78 90.46 5.16 5.16 SCAQMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significance No No No No No No No No b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NOx and PM~0 levels in the area. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to existing residential units located a minimum of 40 feet from proposed construction activities, are at less than significant levels. 10. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 11. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 12. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 12 c-d) The proposed project is the construction of 368 apartment units on a 26.7-acre lot with demolition of three existing residential units in accordance with the City code. The end use of the proposed project, Medium residential, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (~') ( ) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a) A traffic study was prepared for the project by Kunzman Associates in October 2001. The study contains documentation of existing traffic conditions, traffic generated by the proiect, distribution of the project traffic to roads outside the project, and an analysis of future traffic conditions. The following is a summary of the traffic study prepared for the project. Roadways that will be utilized by the development include Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Currently the project site is vacant with the exception of three single-family residences that generate minimal traffic. Existing intersections in the vicinity of the site currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D capacity or better. Once constructed, the project would generate approximately 2,466 daily trips. Total AM peak hour trips would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour trips would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacity or better at intersections in the vicinity. These traffic generation levels are below the San Bemardino County Association of Governments threshold of 250 peak hour trips to require a Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA). The following mitigation measures contained in the traffic study will ensure impacts to traffic and roads in the vicinity are at less than significant leve;s: Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 13 13. Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access. 14. Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-sections as adjacent development occurs. 15. Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in conjunction with development. 16. Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility. 17. Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials. The applicant will be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the project's frontage along Etiwanda Boulevard~ The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair sham of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. b-c) Project design will not result in the creation of hazardous traffic conditions or create dangerous intemections. The proposed project includes two full access points from Foothill Boulevard. The southernmost access point is the main gated entrance and includes a 22-foot entrance and a 20-foot exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two. The second gated entrance is located approximately 700 feet north of the main entrance and includes both a 20-foot entrance and exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two. Both entrances will provide adequate points of ingress/egress and are accessible by emergency vehicles. d) The proposed project must provide a total of 712 parking spaces. The site plan includes 719 parking spaces. e-f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and them is adequate parking along streets. No bus turnout has been provided. g) Located approximately seven miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to usem or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, 'animals, and birds)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 14 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Unl~,~ b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) (,,') ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The 26.7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area. The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. b-c) According to the Arborist Report prepared by Jim Borer, Certified Arborist for the project site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees. There are 72 eucalyptus of various specimens and types, ten Italian cypress, one fan palm, one fruitless mulberry, and two California peppers. In general the eucalyptus trees are quite mature and are in declining condition with 13 dead specimens. Many of the other specimens are under going structural decline. One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused it to defoliate and therefore decline. The eucalyptus trees vary in condition between extremely mature specimens and smaller specimens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees. Trees in both categories are in decline. Based on the proposed site development plan that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen trees on site are expected to be affected. Up to 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate construction. As stated in the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation. Ornamental trees onsite, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress trees are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite. However none of these 11 trees are individually mature or distinct in either form or character and it would not be considered a significant impact if the trees were removed. The applicant has applied for the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all associated fees. The impact is not considered significant as a majority of the trees are in declining condition and the project design indicates that they will be replaced with 120, 36-inch box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 15 d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The 1-15 Freeway borders the site along the west and northwest. The site is immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. Scattered single-family residences occur near and on the site. This development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. issues and Supporting Information Sources: I '~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) inefficient manner?. c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resoume Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u,~ I Irn~act Inco~o~t~d I Irnpict I I~o~t I 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference wJth an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) health hazard? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 16 = I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: d) Exposure of people to existing soumes of ( ) ( ) ( ) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes were observed during a site visit. Several piles of non-hazardous debris were observed onsite and will be removed pdor to grading. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Past and current uses at and near the site include vineyard and residential development. Demolition of residential structures shall be done in accordance with applicable City regulations. The proposed project will not expose people or the environment to hazardous materials. b) Two 50-foot driveways along Etiwanda Avenue will provide adequate access for emergency vehicles for the 26.7-acre site. Fire hose locations will be approved per the Fire Department. All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate turn radii for emergency vehicles. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed onsite. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) Development of the sites will remove dry vegetation and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vicinity. The site is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u~,, T~~ 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (v) ( ) ( ) Comments: a) The proposed project consists of 368 units in four building ranging in height between one and three stories. The single and two-story buildings will house conventional apartments, while the building with three stories will include loft style apartments on the third floor. The project would increase noise levels on-site and in the vicinity because the site is currently vacant. The site surrounds an existing Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 17 neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences that are not a part of the project, and that will remain in place. Construction activities are short-term and related elevated noise levels will cease once construction is complete. Implementation of the City's standard regulations on construction noise will ensure impacts to these residential units are at less than significant levels. These include limiting hours of construction to day-time hours Monday through Friday, Project-related increases in noise associated with developing a vacant site with 368 multi-family units will be consistent with the City's General Plan Noise Element for multi-family projects. The project is not anticipated to generate other than residential noise (i.e., children playing, vehicles entering and exiting, landscape maintenance, etc.) Construction noise can be mitigated through adherence to the City's requirements for restricting noise including delimiting the hours and days when construction can occur. Also the placement of stockpile areas and equipment storage away from the existing residences adjacent to the project site. These conditions of project approval are adequate so that no additional mitigation measures are required. b) The 368 apartment units will be sited immediately east of the elevated 1-15 freeway and west of Etiwanda Avenue. Traffic along freeways and highways can be a significant source of noise. The City's General Plan indicates noise levels exceeding 65 dBA along the 115 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. The project site is located 550 feet from Foothill Boulevard which is also subject to noise levelS exceeding 65 dBA. Environmental noise is normally measured using a special frequency-dependent rating scale because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) compensates for this discrepancy by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. A-weighting de-emphasizes the very Iow and very high frequencies of sound in a manner similar to the human ear. The result is a decibel corrected for the variation in frequency response of the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels. In general, people can perceive a three-dBA difference in noise levels; a difference of 10 dBA is perceived as being twice as loud; 20 dB higher four times as loud; and so forth. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud). Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time, and different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this variability. The most useful noise descriptors measure time-averaged noise levels representing various times of the day as sensitivity to noise increases/decreases (sensitivity to noise increases during evening and night-time hours). The following are definitions of the terminology commonly used to describe noise and noise related impacts. CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) - The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour period, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00 p.m. and before 7:00 a.m. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 18 dB(A) (A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level) - The sound pressure level, in decibels, as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very Iow and very high frequency components of the sound, placing greater emphasis on those frequencies within the sensitivity range of the human ear. Ldn (Day-Night Noise Level) - The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day obtained by adding ten decibels to the hourly noise levels measured during the night (from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). In this way Ldn takes into account the lower tolerance of people for noise during nighttime periods. Leq (Equivalent Energy Level) - The sound level corresponding to a steady- state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period, typically 1, 8 or 24 hours. Lu,~ (Maximum Sound Level) - A statistical value that represents the highest maximum sound level reading during a given period. A traffic noise study report was prepared for the proposed 368-unit project using both City and State of California noise standards. The City's Noise Element requires that where exceeded, the exterior noise adjacent to residential uses must be mitigated to 65 CNEL for outside living areas and that interior noise from exterior noise sources be mitigated to 45 CNEL for indoor living areas. In addition, the state's criteria for implementing surface traffic noise controls from the Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) established by the Federal Highway Administration are 65 dBA leq for exterior residential areas and 52 dBA leq for interior areas. Under state regulations, highway traffic noise must be mitigated when the predicted noise levels "approach or exceed the NAC or when predicted noise levels substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels and it is reasonable and feasible to mitigate. For the noise study, two sound level monitoring systems were used at two sites within the project boundary over a 24-hour period. In addition, short-term noise measurements were taken at three locations to assist in defining the traffic noise propagation on-site. Both the monitoring results and the noise prediction model show that noise due to current traffic on the 1-15 freeway exceeds 65 CNEL at the freeway right-of-way property line. Predictions show that traffic noise due to Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue does not exceed 65 CNEL at the respective property lines. According to traffic information provided by the City, future traffic noise from both Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 freeway will increase, while traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard will remain essentially the same. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 19 For project apartments along the westerly property lines closest to the 1-15 freeway, no "outdoor living areas' are planned for either the sides or the rear of these buildings. They have been designed to serve as 31-foot high by 61 feet long noise barriers for the interior buildings on-site. Without these buildings to act as sound barriers for the 1-15 traffic, noise would be approximately 65 CNEL 1,236 feet from the centerline of the freeway. With the noise mitigation provided by these buildings, freeway traffic noise would not exceed 65 CNEL in the outdoor living areas past the noise barrier apartments, except for the central portion of the freeway right-of-way where no barrier buildings are planned. For the patios and balconies with a full or partial view of the 1-15 freeway through the unmitigated central right-of-way portion of the project, mitigation must be built into the project to reduce noise levels to 65 CNEL or less. Likewise, for units along Etiwanda Avenue, traffic noise at the front of the buildings will be a combination of unmitigated traffic noise from Etiwanda and mitigated 1-15 traffic noise, which would be approximately 65 CNEL 116 feet from the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue. Since Etiwanda Avenue traffic noise would exceed the City's noise standards, the following mitigation is required to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below. 18. A seven-foot high, 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the 1-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City. As described in the noise analysis, the worst-case exterior noise exposure would occur at the second floor of the buildings nearest to the freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. The overall noise levels at the roadway facing sides of the front line apartments would be approximately 75 CNEL along the freeway and 69 CNEL along Etiwanda Avenue. An outdoor-to-indoor noise reduction of 30 dB and 26 dB, respectively, will be required to comply with the 45 CNEL interior noise level target. The following mitigation measure will ensure interior noise 'levels at within City standards. 19. An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation for the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 20. First floor apartment windows in buildings walls that would have a full or partial view of either the 1-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 20 21. Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the 1-15 freeway or Etiwanda, will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~,~ u.,~, ~ 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (,') ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) Comments: The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies the project ama as one of the highest intensities within the Etiwanda planning ama. The area is planned to contain one of the higher land use intensities. Appropriate conditions of approval will be placed on the project prior to development. a-e) Fire Protection - The project site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is located on Baseline Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, 'and approximately two miles northwest of the site. The Foothill Fire District is responsible for evaluating the project through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Police protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department. The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors. Since a portion of the site contains existing residential units, with commercial development occurring less than 550 feet south of the project site, the area is currently patrol and will not required additional police protection. Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the project area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 21 Parks - The proposed project will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units. Facilities will include a Main Recreational Building, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center. Additional amenities include: a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities. Since the project provided several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than significant. b) Public facilities - The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area Medium Residential with projected future traffic after development. The project includes improvements along Etiwanda Avenue right-of-way. Additionally, the proponent will be required to construct all other necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (,~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-g) The proposed project will include the construction of 368 dwelling units. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. The area, as discussed within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, is scheduled to include one of the higher relative land use intensities within the planning area. Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. e) The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. A Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 22 Preliminary Drainage Report prepared for the project by Dan Guerra & Associates indicated that existing Basin Number 6 be excavated to accommodate additional capacity. This will allow development to occur, not increase runoff to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel and eliminate the adversity associated with onsite detention. Drainage Plans will be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for City Engineer review and approval. See Section 4, Water for a discussion of Best Management Practices. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,;) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) Comments.'. a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway. The area is designated Medium Residential development within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project will blend with current and proposed surrounding development. The project site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. With the exception of single-family residences, all other proposed development within the oveday district is subject to the issuance of the CUP. In addition to applying for a CUP, it is the intent of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue by requiring special setbacks, traditional architectural styles, and landscaping to be consistent with the streetscape theme for Etiwanda Avenue. The proposed project includes aesthetically pleasing elevations with large open space area and the replacement of declining trees with 1,202 new trees. c) The project will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant. However, the site has been identified as a residential site so new light will not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other residential development in the area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u,~, 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 23 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~t s I,,~p~~ IM"~au~ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resoumes. The site is located in a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the project site. Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: ~ 'r~ s?.,m~a=~m~ Mm~,on s~r.:~t ~ 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) regional parks, or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) Comments: a) The proposed project will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units. Recreational facilities will include a Main Recreational Building, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center. Additional amenities include: a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities. Since the project provides several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than significant. b) The proposed project will be constructed on land that contains three existing residential units, and is designated Medium Residential. Surrounding and adjacent land are also designated residential or commercial and are either currently developed, being developed or proposed for development. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557. Page 24 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) (,") ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ('~) 0 are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,' and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) (v) ( ) ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The 26.7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area. The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. According to the Arborist Report prepared for the project site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees. There are 72 eucalyptus of various specimens and types, ten Italian Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 25 cypress, one fan palm, one fruitless mulberry, and two California peppers. In general the eucalyptus are quite mature and are in declining condition and 13 specimens are dead. Many of the other specimens are under going structural decline. One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused it to defoliate and therefore decline. The eucalyptus trees vary in condition between extremely mature specimens and smaller specimens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees. Trees in both categories are in decline. Based on the proposed site development that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen trees on site are expected to be grossly impacted. Therefore 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate construction. As stated within the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation. Ornamental trees onsits, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite. However none of these 11 trees are individually mature or distinct in either from or character and it would not be considered a significant impact if the trees were removed. The developer has acquired the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all associated fees. The impact is not considered significant as a majority of the trees are in declining condition and the project design indicates they will be replaced with 120, 36-inch box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite. b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality and noise with development of the project site. The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activities. However, the impacts will cease once construction activities are completed. Implementation of'mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant. c) The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification, of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of 368 apartments would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce impacts to less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 26 Additionally. impacts resulting from air quality ara short-term and will cease once construction activities ara completed. A noise study was prepared for the project to identify traffic noise levels at the project site. The report indicated that the 1-15 Freeway would be the dominate noise impact for the area. The noise model in conjunction with the onsite noise measurements indicated that the building face for the first row of apartments along the freeway would be exposed to noise levels as high as 79.2 CNEL, and that the entire site experiences noise levels greater than 65 CNEL. The first row of apartments along Etiwanda Avenue would be exposed to a maximum traffic noise level of about 67.2 CNEL. The exterior living areas in the project must comply with the City's 65 CNEL. Mitigation measure contained in the report are preliminary and are contained in this Initial Study. A final report shall be preparad to finalize findings and measures prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the proiect must comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL. As previously stated, the first row of buildings along the 1-15 will experience noise levels as high as 79.3 CNEL. This will requira outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 34.2 dB to achieve the indoor noise standard. This is a substantial level of noise reduction to achieve. Windows facing the freeway should be small and will need to be upgraded with a high noise rating. The exact rating of window will depend on the size and other elements. A final noise analysis must be prepared to address the interior noise levels prior to the issuance of buildings permits. The second row of buildings along 1-15 will experience noise levels as high as 73 CNEL This will require outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 28 dB. High noise rating windows will be required for these units. The rating of window depends on size and other elements.'The first row of buildings will experience noise levels of about 67 CNEL A noise reduction of 22 dB will meet the City's standards. Window and other buildings upgrades will not likely be requirad for these units. · Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): · Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (Certified 1983) · Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) · Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) · United States Fish & Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.//~ ~J~ ~~Date o~ /////0 Signature: ~.. ~" Print Name and Title: / '~-- RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, and 29. A. Recitals. 1. Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map S UBTT16257 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 9 and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. . Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue, and an apprexJmate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. Eight existing single-family residences, not a part of the proposed project, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site. The 1-15 Freeway borderS the property on the north and west. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development. To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved for a 272 multi-family residential development; and c. The application contemplates a condominium subdivision of one lot for 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land within the Medium Residential District, Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Efiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 2 d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above. referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 3 Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin,q Division: 1) Provide a greenway connection in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 5.33.400. 2) Construct a 6-foot decorative wrought iron fence along project boundary adjoining the following parcels: APN: 227-211-22 and 23. 3)Walls shall comply with setback requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan. En,qineerin,q Division: 1) construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Arterial" and Etiwanda Specific Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, street trees, a.c. pavement, traffic signs, and striping: a)Provide a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from the north project boundary to Miller Avenue. b) Provide separate right-turn lanes at both project entrances. The right tum lane south of Garcia Drive can be combined with a school bus bay per City Standards. 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service. 3) An in-lieu' fee as contribution to the futura undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map approval. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage facilities in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to the existing tem3inus south of Tract 15711-1. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. This area is subject to the pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 - FORECASTCORPORATION Janua~ 23,2002 Page 4 modified fee adopted March 21, 2001. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5) Install local storm drain facilities as needed from the project site to Foothill Boulevard. Install manhole at public/private junction. 6) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for Q100. Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches. 7) Provide an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos. 227-211-17, 227-211-22, and 227-211-23. 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No. 6. 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-wide detention basin. The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.). The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, which shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 10) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard. The required storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a City easement north of the Caltrans right-of-way. Off-site easements shall be obtained prior to Final Map approval. Environmental Miticotion: Geologic 1) Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils. Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineerin a final geotechnical reporL 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stormwater will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's storm drain system. 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 5 Air Quality 1) Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3) Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 5) Chemical soil stabilizerS (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hourS or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factorS and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Transpo~ation 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access. 2) Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-sections as adjacent development occurS. 3) Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in conjunction with development. 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility. 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 6 Noise 1) Seven-foot high 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the 1-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the canterline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City. 2) An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation of the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 3) First floor apartment windows in building walls that would have a full or partial view of either the 1-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. 4) Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the 1-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall carti~ to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUB'1-1'16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION Janua~23, 2002 Page 7 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUB'l-r16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and th& procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program TT SUB'I-1'16257 & CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible Citydepartment also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Derision shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Applicant: Forecast Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Natalie P. Patty Date: December 18, 2001 Sits grading shall include removal and reoompaction of surface soils. CE S Review of Plans C 2 Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnical report. Pdor te issuance of grading pormits for the project, a final grading plan CP/CE B Review of Plans D 2 shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how CP/CE B ReviewofPlans D 2 stormwater will be conveyed across the site and directed into the Ciys storm drain s~stem. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicent shall identify BMPs CE B Review of Plans C 2 to be implemented dudng the pedod the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period orS0 da~s. CP C Review of Plans A 2 The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agenl CP C Review of Plans A 2 (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance t~Jth SCAQMD Rule 403. Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established CP C Review of Plans A 2 by the Ci[y to reduce PM 10 emissions associated with vehicle ~racking of soil off-site. Timing may vap/depending upon time of year of consl~ucfion. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of Plans A 2 25mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of Plans A 2 be applied to all inactive constmcfion areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP C Review of Plans A 2 used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all conslmction equipment will be ~uned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Maintain a high level of sen, ice along arterials by resthcting parking PO C Review of Plans A 2 and controlling roadway access. Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross- CE C Reviewof Plans A 2 sections as adjacent development occum. Construct all streets bordering the project to ulfirnaf~ half-section CE C Review of Plans A 2 widths in conjunction v, ith development. Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height CP D Review of Plans A 3 within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility install a STOP sign on site egress mad~ay to adjacent arterials. CP D Review of Plans A 3 Seven-foot high, 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion CP D Review of Plans A 3 resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be instatied at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the 1-15 freewaay and within 140 feet of the osntedine of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or papal view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the BO D Review of Plans A 3 design to provide ventilation for the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. First floor apartment windows in building walls that would have a full ~ BO D Review of Ptans A 3 partial view of either the I-f 5 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acousticatiyrated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. Buildings nearest the rosdways that have a full or partial view of either BO D Review of Ptans A 3 the 1-15 fl'eeway or Efiw'anda Avenue will require the placement of acousticatiy rated exterior dcors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shati be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance ofbuilding permits for the affected buildings. Checklist Abbreviations Re~ible pe~ Meth~d of Verification CDD - ~mmuni~ Developmant Dim~or o~ d~ign~ A - ~ Ea~ New ~velopment A - ~-site Inspe~on 1 - Wilhold Re~rdafion of ~nal Map CP - Ci~ Planner or desion~ B - P~or To ~ns~on B - ~er Agenw Pe~it / ~pmval 2 - Wilhold Grading or Bu~]ding Pe~it CE - Ci~ Engin~r ~ ~=~;~,,ee C - ~mugh~t ~ns~on C - Plan Che~ 3 - Wilhold Ce~ifi~te of ~pancy BO - Building ~dal ~ designee D - ~ ~mplefion D - Separate Submi~l (Re~ / S~dt~ I Plans) 4 - Stop Wo~ ~er PO - Poli~ Cap.in or d~ign~ E - ~emflng 5 - Re~in ~posit or Bonds FC - Rm Chief or d~lgnee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTI'16257 SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements comoletion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court casts and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 16257 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557. 3. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Project No. SUaTT16257 Completion Date 2. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 5. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 6. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association ara subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. D. Landscaping 1. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debds and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 2. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 3. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda Avenue E. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be raquirad to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance Project No. SUBTT16257 Completion Date and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOP, COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F; General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: __ __/__ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. __ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. __ __/__ 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workem' Compensation coverage to __/__ the City prior to permit issuance. G. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable cedes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to / existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tractJparcel map recordation and / prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3 2 5 Project No. SUBTT16257 ComDletion Date 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 6.Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. H, New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. 7. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the / construction type shall be V-1 Hour. 8. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour / fire-resistive construction. I. Grading 1. Grading of the subJect property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and appreved prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (999) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1.Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Eitwanda Avenue Project No. SUBTT16257 Completion Date 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Etiwanda Avenue 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final pamel map. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within futura rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the __ final map. 6. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 __ /__ feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 7. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-sita property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain. K. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: ICurb& A.C. Side- Drive Stnmt Street Comm Maclan Bke Etiwanda Avenue I (f)~lxl~l~ ~ Notes: (a) Median island includes ~andscaping and irrigation on meter~ (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilineer per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Project No. SUBTT16257 Cornolefion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified, e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__ 4. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: 1-15 Freeway L. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. M. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Ail drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the __/____ property from adjacent areas. N. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __/____ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Project No. SUBTT16257 Completion Date 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. __ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. O. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage __ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: Cai __ Trans. 3. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all __ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATrACHED PROTECTION STRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVlEVV~: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: SUBTT16257/DRC2001-00557 PROJECT NAME: Forecast Group DATE: December 18, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for 386 Unit Apartments APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schiro OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/Group A, Division 3 Uses FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling units LOCATION: N/O of Foothill W/O Etiwanda FD REVIEW BY Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kirt Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the project as submitted. These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire Distdct requirements for the proposed project. Changes in the project may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements. Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review. Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed. All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued. Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance. A. Community Facilities Districts 1. This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. 3. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-B, as amended. 4. When any portion ot~cility or building is located in excess of~-feet from a fire hydrant located on a pubhc street on-site f re--- hydrants and ma'ns capable of supplying~e required fire flow shall be provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight. 5. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 6. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 7. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 8. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground. 10. Required Note: If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the building permit: a. Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system. A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b. For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance. 11. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. C. Water Availability 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s). 2. All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 3. Required Note: Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District. 4. Prior to the issuanc~a building permit, the applicant shall su~ plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fire Construction Services for review arid approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 6. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. E. Fire Access 1. Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from approved fire district vehicle access. The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building. 2. Fire District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes. 3. Residential: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes. All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards. 4. Residential & Commercial: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. All proposed fire apparatus tumarounds shall be cleady marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 5. The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire Distdct access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet. The minimum vertical cleerence is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet. 6. All portions of the facility or any portion of the extedor wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the extedor of the building. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to extedor building openings. 7. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pdor to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordedng ~ information. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain bhe Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across required Fire District access roadways/driveways. 9. Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch. Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Preemption Device. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordedng information. 10. The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. This condition applies when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists. 11. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles. 12. A building or site directory shall be required, as noted below: Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site. 13. A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following: Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards. 14. Dead-end Fire Distric~lcess roadways in excess of 150-feet sha[~ provided with approved provisions for the tuming around of fire apparatus. This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District. 15. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access - Fire Lanes" standard. 16. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all raquired fire lanes. 17. New buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated dudng periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public sb'eet an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. 18. In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings. The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. Combustible Consb'uction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. (~. Architectural Building Plans 1. Prior to approval of a site developmentJuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District. Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prier to submittal. H. Fire Alarm System 1. An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. 3. Pdor to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are required. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services. 4. Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. I. Fire District Fees Due 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows: * $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Prival~lre Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground W~Supply $677 (per new building) for Multi-family Residential Development *Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. J. Hazard Control Permits 1. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property. b. Operate a place of public assembly. c. To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire district access roadway. This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response. d. Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet. e. Operate dust-producing processes and operations. f. Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use). g. Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons). h. Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy). K. Hazardous Materials - Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1. The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bemardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance. They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year, 3. All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated. 4. Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (11) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount. 5. Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount. 6. Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T.P.Q.). Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355. 7. Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title Ill. Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities. There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements. To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202. Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies. Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement; however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1. Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory. 8. Any business that h s radioactive material that is listed in ~ix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR. 9. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance. 10. Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing, stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner. 11. The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan - New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department. In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs. L. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA sPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDAAVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29. A. Recitals. 1. Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject conditional use permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue, and an approximate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. Eight existing single-family residences, not a part of the proposed project, are located on an inverted L-shaped preperty at the central portion of the site. The 1-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development. To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved for a 272 multi-family residential development; and c. The application contemplates the development of 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land within the Medium Residential District, Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557- FORECAST CORPORATION Janua~ 23,2002 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The conditional use permit is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The development of the proposed project will not cause a significant traffic impact on the surrounding area; and e. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable inju~j to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and f. The design of the project will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and' Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the proJect, which are listed as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the infom~ation provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin.q Division: 1) Provide a greenway connection in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 5.33.400. 2) Construct a decorative wrought iron fence or wall along the interior project boundary, subject to City Planner review and approval. 3) Walls shall comply with setback requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan. 5) The roll-up garage door designs shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 6) Architectural enhancements through the use of native fiver rock shall be provided to the buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue, subject to City Planner review approval. 7) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the interior project perimeter adjacent to the existing single-family residences a~ the central portion of the site, to reduce the visual impact of the proposed buildings on the surrounding neighbors, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8) The decorative perimeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large native stone pilasters in its design. The stone pilasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared and subject to City Planner approval. 9) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 shall apply. 10) Lighting shall be required to provide a minimum 1-foot candlepower. Freestanding light standards shall not exceed 15 feet in height. Security lighting fixtures shall not project above the fascia or roofline of the building. All lighting shall be shielded to confine light spread within the site boundaries. 11) The final sidewalk locations and trash enclosura location immediately adjacent to the existing single-family homes along Chervil Street shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 12) The applicant shall provide underground utility connections to the lots surrounded by the proposed project subject to City Planner review and approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 4 Enqineering Division: 1) Construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Arterial" and Etiwanda Specific Plan Standards, including cobbie curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, street trees, a.c. pavement, traffic signs, and striping: a) Provide a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from the north project boundary to Miller Avenue. b) Provide separate right turn lanes at both project entrances. The right turn lane south of Garcia Drive can be combined with a school bus bay per City Standards. 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service. 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map approval. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount. times the length of the project frontage. 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage facilities in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. This area is subject to the modified fee adopted March 21, 2001. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5) Install local storm drain facilities as needed from the project site to Foothill Boulevard. Install manhole at public/private junction. 6) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for Qt00. Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches. 7) Provide an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos. 227-211-22 and 227-211-23. 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No. 6. 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-wide detention basin. The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.). The PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 2:~ 2002 Page 5 fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, which shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 10) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard. The required storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a City easement north of the Caltrans right-of-way. Off-site easements shall be obtained prior to Final Map approval. Environmental MitiRation: Geologic 1) Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils. Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineerin a final geotechnical report. 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how storm water will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's store1 drain system. 2) Pdor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the pedod the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. Air Qualfly 1) Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3) Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time .of year of construction. 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION Janua~ 23,2002 Page 6 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Transporta§on 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access. 2) Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-seotions as adjacent development occurs. 3) Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in conjunction with development. 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility. 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials. Noise 1) Seven-foot high 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the 1-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submJffed to the City. 2) An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation of the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 3) First floor apartment windows in buildings walls that would have a full or partial view of either the 1-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. PLANNING COMMISSION RESO~.UTION NO. 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 7 4) Buildings nearest the ro;~dways that ha~'e a full or partial view of either the 1-15 Freeway dr Etiwanda Avenue, Will require the placemen.t of acoustically rated exterior doore. The final design and rating of the ' · doore and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission sha certify to the. adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO cuCAMONGA L,,/ La~f T. M~Ni~I, Chairman I, 8r~d Bullet, Secr~t,ary of ths Planning Commission of the Cit~ of Rancho ~ucamong~, do heml~ certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of jan. uary 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MAC[AS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEVVART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-r16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are. implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of appreval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program TT SUB'I-1'16257 & CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible Citydepartment also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Devision shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. _These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Applicant: Forecast Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Natalie P. Patty Date: December 18, 2001 Site grading shaft include removal and mcompacfion of surface soils. CE B Review of Plans C 2 Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnical report. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan CP/CE B Review of Plans D 2 shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. wat~ 'r~e applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how CP/CE B Review of Plans D 2 stormwatar will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's storm drain system. Pdor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs CE B Review of Plans C 2 to be implemented during the period the site is under construction, BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of S0 days, CP C Review of Plans A 2 The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabili',ing agent CP C Review of Plans A 2 (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance vith SCAQMD Rule 403. Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established CP C Review of Plans A 2 by the City to reduce PM 10 emissions associated with vehicle fraddng of soil off-sito, Timing may vary depondlng upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shaft be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of Plans A 2 25mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of Plans A 2 be applied to all inactive constmcfion areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP C Review of Plans A 2 used on-sita based on Iow emissice factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans inciude a statament that all constmc~ion equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The construction con,actor shati utilize elecMc or dean altsmalJve rue CP C Review of Plans A 2 powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B/C Review of Plans A/C 2 plans include a statement that work crews will shut offequipment when not in use. Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking PO C Review of Plans A 2 and controlling roadway access. Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross- CE C ReviewofPlans A 2 sections as adjacent development occurs. Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section CE C Review of Plans A 2 widths in conjunction with development. Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 Inches in height CP D Review of Plans A 3 within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility Install a STOP sign on site egress roed~ay to adjacent arterials. CP D Review of Plans A 3 Seven-fcot high, 5/8-Inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion CP D Review of Plans A 3 resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the 1-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the eanterline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or parUal view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the BO D Review of Plans A 3 design to provide ventilation for the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. Firet fleer apartment windows in building walls that would have a full or BO D Review of Plans A 3 parUal view of either the 1-15 freeway or Etwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior fo issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either BO D Review of Plans A 3 the 1-15 freeway or EtJwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance ofbuilding permits for the affected buildings. Ke~ Re~P°~ibie PerS°~ M°~it°rl~ ~quen~~ : ~d Of ~/erlflCatl~ $';n~fi°ns CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A- On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC ~ Rte Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comolet~on Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign pregrem, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptscle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 11. Ail building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / including proper illumination. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 13. Ail parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Project No,DRC2001-00557 Completion Date 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall ____/__ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing wails/ fences along the project's perimeter. 16. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. ___/__ 17. For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 18.For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior Iockable storage space shall be provided. 19. For residential development, recreation areaJfacility shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 20. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured ____ products. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts __ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall __ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided __ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. Ail parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, __ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5.Ail units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth __ from back of sidewalk. 6. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 7. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-araund space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date 8. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. F, Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pdor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4.Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:'1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-cJallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda .Avenue Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date 10.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the __ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of __/__ __ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 13. On projects which abut the 1-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the ! freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the project, if final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way. 14. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear / feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). G. signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior / to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. H. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Pict Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 4.Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but ara not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4,Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m, Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Project No. DRC2001~00557 Completion Date 6. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department / /__ for approval. L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances considering / /__ use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). __/____ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. __/____ 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table __/____ 5-A. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. 7. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour. 8.Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to / perform such work. 3.A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4..The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Etiwanda Avenue. Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all pamels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final pamel map. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 6. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 7. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City pdor to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to:_Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain. O. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Medan Bke -.- Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. SC-I 1-01 8 Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d, Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / /__ 4. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: 1-15 / /__ Freeway. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. Q, Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the / property from adjacent areas. R, Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required, 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __/__ Project No. DRC2001-00557 Comoletion Date 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs frsrst. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final pamel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional. and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: Cai Trsans. 3. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. U. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch Single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doorrs. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. Ail garage or rolling doorsrs shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 4. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. V. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. SC-11-01 10 Project No. DRC2001-00557 Completion Date W. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted / from frame or track in any manner. 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or / prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. X. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / visibility, 2. At the entrances of commemial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of / project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. 3. All developments shall submit a 8 %" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant __/__ __ developments to the Police Department. Y. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-01 11 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00557/SUB'I-1'16257 PROJECT NAME: Forecast Group DATE: December 18, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for 386 Unit Apartments APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schim OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/Group A, Division 3 Uses FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling units LOCATION: N/O of Foothill W/O Etiwanda FD REVIEW BY Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kirt Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the project as submitted. These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District requirements for the proposed project. Changes in the project may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements. Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review. Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed. All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued. Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance. A. Community Facilities Districts 1. This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. a. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. 3. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix iii-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Iii-B, as amended. 4. When any portion of a facility or building is located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight. 5. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 6. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 7. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 8. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground. 10. Required Note: If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the building permit: a. Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system. A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b. For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance. 11. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Marl(ers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. Co Water Availability 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate flra flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s). 2. All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 3. Required Note: Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 6. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. E. Fire Access 1. Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from approved fire district vehicle access. The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building. 2. Fire District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated tire lanes. 3. Residential: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tractJparcel map, the applicent shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and tire lanes. All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards. 4. Residential & Commercial: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. Ali proposed tire apparatus tumarounds shall be dearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when othen,vise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in tire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 5. The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shail be 20 feet. 6. All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the tire apparatus access road to exterior building openings. 7. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across required Fire District access roadways/driveways. 9. Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch. Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Pre-emption Device. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 10. The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. This condition applies when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists. 11. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles. 12. A building or site directory shall be required, as noted below: Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site. 13. A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following: Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained flee and dear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards. 14. Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District. 15. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access- Fire Lanes" standard. 16. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. 17. New buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet fi.om the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. 18. In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings. The Fire District shall review, and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. Combustible Consb'uction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distdct on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. G. ,N'chitecturel Building Plans 1. Prior to approval of a site development/use permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District. Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal. H. Fire Alarm System 1. An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. 3. Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are required. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services. 4. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. I. Fire District Fees Due 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows: * $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new building) for Multi-family Residential Development · Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. J. Hazard Control Permits 1. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property. b. Operate a place of public assembly. c. To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire district access roadway. This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response. d. Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet. e. Operate dust-producing processes and operations. f. Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use). g. Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons). h. Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy). K, Hazardous Materials - Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1. The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bemardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-304'1 for forms and assistance. They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year. 3. All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated. 4. Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (11) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount. 5. Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount. 6. Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T.P.Q.). Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355. 7. Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III. Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities. There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements. To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202. Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies. Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement; however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1. Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory. 8. Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR. 9. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance. 10. Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner. 11. The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan - New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bemardino County Fire Department. In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs. L, Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved pdor to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 113 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acres) of the. Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street and approximately 300 feet north of the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street. APN: 225-101-.44. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14523-1, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14494, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTr15902. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that staff was requesting that Item B be pulled from the Consent Calendar. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Stewart, to adopt Items A and C of the Consent Calendar. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY - carried B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675 Debra Meier, Contract Planner, presented the staff report and indicated staff was suggesting three minor revisions to the resolution to increase the wall height to 8 feet along the project perimeter and to clarify the conditions regarding the wall along the south boundary and the security lighting. Chairman McNiel invited public comment. Joe Carroll, Copart, Inc., 2176 The Alameda, San Jose, concurred with the changes. He stated he has the opportunity to fly around the counfly and he felt it had been a real pleasure to work with Rancho Cucamonga, particularly Ms. Meier. There were no additional Public comments. Chairman McNiel stated the developer had been very cooperative. He supported the project. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Development Review DRC2001-00675 with modifications suggested by staff. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY - carried PUBLIC HEARINGS D. '~ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB'Iq'16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26.7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 23, 2002 "G'" E.' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Dist~ct, and Etiwanda Avenue Oveday District within the Efiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTI'16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Kirt Coury, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and indicated a new site utilization map, site map, conceptual grading plan, and landscape plan were placed in front of the Commissioners. Chairman McNiel asked if staff had met with the surrounding residents with respect to the issues brought forth. Mr. Coury responded affirmatively. He said he met with several at the Planning counter, spoke with them on the telephone, and met with them at the neighborhood meeting. Chairman McNiel asked how many attended the neighborhood meeting. Mr. Coury replied approximately 10 residents attended the first meeting on November 20, 2001, and approximately 12 attended the meeting on JanuapJ 17, 2002. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Jimmy Previfi, Forecast Homes, 10670 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they read the staff report and were willing to accept all conditions. Chairman McNiel noted Mr. previty met with the neighbors and asked if they were working to resolution on the issues raised by the neighbors. Mr. previti felt they were. Brad Buller, City Planner, noted that several issues were raised at the neighborhood meeting including one issue regarding fire safety. He reported that fire staff met with homeowners on the property earlier in the day and a representative of the Fire District was available to respond. He said staff had tried to be available and had encouraged them to question such things as sewer locations and capacities or direction on whether a new system might have to be built if the residents wish to develop their properties in the future. He indicated staff suggested the residents work directly with Cucamonga County Water District. He said that one of the questions asked by the residents concemed the street improvements being done and what the drive access will be like when the street improvements are done and when the proposed project is done. Dan Guerra, Dan Guerm and Associates, 10271 B Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, observed that at the neighborhood meeting, residents asked questions relative to the improvements currently being constructed on Etiwanda Avenue by another development project. He said that project is across the street and his firm happens to be the consultants on that project as well. He said they had not specifically answered those questions at the neighborhood meeting, but itwas indicated that · the plans are available at City Hall. He stated that Efiwanda Avenue is currently being widened and the Etiwanda frontage across the current residents' properties is not being widened at the present time.· He said the existing rock and rubble curb is being replaced with an asphalt berm in the same location and asphalt driveways are being installed onto the existing access driveways on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, including Chervil Streat to improve the situation.. Mr. Buller pointed out that the residents questioned the southerly drive ecc~_ ss location on Etiwancla Avenue. He said the residents wondered if the access could or should be moved. He reported that Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 23, 2002 '- the Design Review Committee was aware that this driveway access was aligned with the apartment project across the street. He said staff again looked at the access, and believes that it is better to have the driveways aligned than to have them offset. Mr. Coury noted that the wall along the northwest property line would be a minimum of 8 feet and a maximum of 10 feet including a 2-foot retaining wall. He said there may be a maximum of 14-foot high walls in some areas with an 8-foot exposed wall and a 6-foot retaining wall because of the grade difference. He stated that at the first neighborhood meeting two property owners indicated they did not want an 8-foct wall and the developer indicated a willingness to use wrought iron fencing. He commented the neighbors accepted that solution at the first neighborhood meeting; however, they indicated at the January 17 meeting they may prefer the block wall. Den Glover, 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he owns the lot south of Chervil Street with two houses and has lived there for 23 years and his family owned the property for over 100 years. He said he received a flyer fora neighborhood meeting and was told they would be building apartments adjacent to his lot. He agreed the apartments are beautiful but said he will be driving through an apartment complex to get to his driveway. He did not feel that was right. He felt he would be landlocked if the project were approved and his property would not be of value to anyone except Forecast. He said he would have walls completely sun'ounding him. He commented that he was told prior to the latest neighborhood meeting that the 2-3~ acre parcel would not be d~veloped and he had assumed that meant the entry would be moved. He said he has reoon:ls to show there is an easement that was dedicated in 1921 and rededicated in 1964 for ingress and egress to his property and his neighbor's property. He stated that.10 cars currently use that easement and he objected to now having to share that read with 346 apartment dwellers. He felt that traffic is definitely impacted. He said that there will be a great visual impact as the area is currently open fields. He commented that it is now quiet except for noise from the freeWay, which puts him to sleep. He asked that the developer stub out infrastructure utilities (gas, water, etc.) so his land will be worth something. He said they were told at the neighborhood meeting that water and sewar would be stubbed in. He stated he asked about electric, gas, cable, and telephone and the developer responded they would not stub out for those. He acknowledged that the developer was trying to work with the residents but felt that the situation was benefiting Forecast Homes and not his lifestyle. He said that the developer has asked to move his (Mr. Glover's) 20-foot easement to Chervil Street and said the developer had suggested giving him property along his easterly propert3~ line, but he would then have to do a u-turn to get into his garage. He thought the project would then have to go back through Design Review. He asked if Chervil Street would then become a public street. He inquired if the developerwould be required to bring in all utilities. He commented that the 2Y=-acre parcel will eventually be built when the zoning is changed from Low Medium to Medium. Mr. Glover said his way of life is being affeote(~. He requested the project be denied, Juanita Sandoval, 12820 Cliervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she lives in the house at the west end of Chervil Street and will be surrounded on two sides by the proposed apartment development. She objected to the apartments because it .will interfere with her mountain view, afternoon breezes, privacy, and lack of traffic. She said migratory birds visit the mature trees surrounding her property. She believed there had been no environmental specialist to determine if the development will adversely impact the survival of the birds. She asked if the birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Act and asked if the California Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife Service had reviewed and approved the environmental documents. She objected to the loss of her rural atmosphere. She noted an 8-foot block wall is proposed to be located approximately 5 feet from her home. She said she lives in a single-story house and a two-story apartment building is proposed to be located approximately 30 feet from her property line and the apartments will be at a higher elevation. She objected to the apartments having windows that would have a view into her backyard and bedroom windows. She acknowledged that the developer has indicated he will provide landscaping to provide privacy and she asked that they be required to do so. She was also concerned that there will be a sidewalk adjacent to the wall that borders his backyard. She felt that would encourage graffiti and vandalism to the wall and grant easy access to climbing over the wall; Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 23, 2002 -. She preferred that the sidewalk be removed and landscaping such as thorny vines be planted to grow on the wall to deter wall climbing. She expressed concerns about the safety of her children. She said that Chervil Street is a private dirt road that varies from 15 feet to 25 feet wide and has little traffic. She stated the proposed block wall will abruptly dead-end Chervil Street on the west end. She reported that trash trucks currently use the dirt mad to turn around safely rather than backing down the road. She said she currently has an alternate escape route but the proposed development will block off that exit. She felt that large vehicles such as trash trucks will be forced to back up the entire length of the dirt road. She said she contacted Burtec and was told they did not have an official comment but the route supervisor feared they may not be able to staff their trucks with only one person if they have to back up onto Etiwanda Avenue. She said that pedestrians and bicyclists use the dirt road as well and they would be endangered if the trash trucks back out. She was concerned that the dirt road they have been able to use for the last 6 years would no longer be available as an alternate escape route in case of fire or earthquake. She said that at the January 17 neighborhood meeting, they asked the developer to grant an access easement to allow trucks to safely turnaround and he responded it was not his responsibility to give up any of his land. She felt they may have a prescriptive easement and asked that the City make the developer grant access to the property for a cul-de-sac to remain in its pre-existing location. She felt that would solve many safety and traffic concams. She was appalled the City would allow a zoning change to support apartment units adjacent to land where only single-family homes exist. She felt her investment in her home will be lost once the apartments are built. She thought single-family homes or single story condominiums should be built. She asked that the project not be approved until the developer addresses the problems created with respect to privacy, safety, and the investments of the existing homeowners. Daniel Sandoval, 12820 Chervil Street, presented a list of requested conditions including: t) require developer to bring in water mains to support the City code for minimum fire hydrant spacing for residential districts, 2) allow existing cul-de-sac to remain at the west end of Chervil Street through prescriptive easement rights, 3) require developer to grant sewer access at each existing property or at the west end of Chervil Street to the proposed maximum density of 14 units per acre to avoid more costly installation in the future, 4) require developer to grant land along the southeastem portion of Chervil Street and to pave and widen Chervil Street to 26 feet, 5) remove sidewalk bordering the wall along his property line, 6) require trash disposal dumpsters be located away from his property to avoid odor or debris from going onto his property, 7) require locations and coverings of lights to prevent visible glare and lighting from affecting his property, and 8) require sufficient landscaping to provide privacy screening and prevent graffiti and vandalism and discourage people from climbing the wall. He thought the Etiwanda Specific Plan requires logical phasing of facilitias such as sewers and water in order to minimize the cost of sen/ica to an area. He said that Cucamonga County Water District felt it would be logical to require the developer to provide access points for sewer and water access for fire hydrants to the adjacent properties to avoid possibly having to install a pumping station at a later time. He showed some pictures of the current dirt road turmaround and the proposed location of the wall. He thought the mad does not currently confon~ to the 14 foot 6 inch height access for emergency access and noted the road is only 15 feet wide in some areas. Joe Rusling, 12839 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the staff report indicates he has access to Chervil Street and that resolves some of the issues. He did not think Chervil Street is a street, but is instead his neighbor's driveway and he did not feel he or Mr. GIover have any legal ~ght . to use it. He said he does not currently use Chervil Street because he uses the easement that has been in place since 1921. He observed that the City has never developed Chervil Street as a street He noted that many of the issues raised by residents were considered resolved by the deletion of the 2~-acre parcel from this development. He felt that was irrelevant because the parcel' will be developed as soon as the zoning is changed. Wesley La Nier, 12830 Chervil Street, stated he would like to second everything that his neighbors said. He noted that reports showed there should be no problems with flooding. He said Chervil Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 23, 2002 -. Street has a 10-foot rise near Etiwanda Avenue and then drops back down. He feared that debris would be carried down and back up at the wall at the west end of Chervil, clogging up the drainage and cause flooding. He indicated that his house closed escrow the day before his first meeting with Forecast and the escrow papers stated his house was in a Low Medium area. He felt changing the zoning to Medium will result in an increase in crime. He stated he was concemed about the change to his way of life. He said that pairs of Red Tail Hawks and Kestrel Hawks use the area for feeding. He stated the United States Postal Service moved their mailboxes to a turnout that is about 75 feet off Etiwanda Avenue because of the current widening of Etiwanda Avenue. He said the mail boxes did not indicate where the mailboxes will ultimately be located, but said they would not be placed back on Etiwanda Avenue because of traffic issues. He felt their property values would decrease or stagnate. He submitted a letter signed by four homeowners requesting that the project be retermd back for further evaluation. It asked that the developer be required to dedicate land to allow the widening of Chervil Street and allow the City to provide utility services. The letter also stated their belief that the environmental review of the process was not adequate and asked that the project not be approved until such time as public meetings are held to discuss whether apartments are appropriate of if the project should be a condominium development. They also asked for further environmental review and consideration of conditions of approval to protect the current residents' way of life or protect their development potential. He said it is currently a nice, quiet place to live and that children play in the street and that will no longer be possible. Tracy Glover, 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the utilities for her property and the Rusling property are undergrounded where the proposed driveway will be located. She said that if they have a water or gas leak, they did not know how they would get to the pipes. She noted their water meters are currently on Etiwanda Avenue on Forecast's property and she questioned where they would be moved. She did not like the prospect of having to drive through an apartment complex to reach her home and felt it would interfere with her ability to sell her home. She said they would be virtually landlocked; particularly once the 2s,/=-acre parcel is developed. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel asked staff to respond to some of the comments raised. Mr. Buller reported that there was no zone change before the Commission tonight. He said the property has had the current zoning of Medium and Low Medium for quite some time and the single- family homes have always had the multi-family zoning surrounding them since the adoption of the Etiwanda SpeCific Plan in the early 19805. He stated there had been a neighborhood meeting in an attempt to address some of the issues raised by the neighbors and the applicant has indicated a willingness to address some of the issues. He observed that some of the issues raised this evening were new requests, such as the removal of the sidewalk along the Sandoval property. He said staff could handle the site design issues such as the intense landscaping request, relocation of the sidewalk and trash receptacles, etc. Regarding the issue of prascriptiVe rights, he commented that the Commission does not sit as a court on that decision. He said there has been no evidence presented to the City that concludes that they have easement rights over Forecast property. He stated the commission may still consider the actions or requests of the homeowners. He noted the developer has indicated a willingness to consider providing a pedestrian gate for emergency exit into the apartment project. He said the developer had also indicated a willingness to consider a turn- around at the end of Chervil Street, but staff pointed out there is sufficient reom on the existing properties without going onto the applicant's property. He said all parties involved could solve the problem with cooperation or on their own. He remarked that a representative of the Fire District was there and had indicated to staff that the proposed project benefits the fire safety elements of the existing homes. He said there is currently a surrounding field that may or may not be maintained and the Fire District had indicated the project could create a firebreak around the existing homes. VVith respect to the trash trucks and safety equipment coming up the private street, he said the maintenance of the private street is the responsibility of the homeowners and they need to repair potholes or widen the street if necessary. He indicated staff does not believe it should be the Planning commission Minutes -6- January 23, 2002 .. obligation of the developer to pave Chervil or mn new utility lines. He believed the Glover and Rustling properties have electrical service off Chervil Street, so he felt there must be some utility access easements in place. 'He noted the applicant agreed to run the other services along the most southerly properly line. He said he could not respond to the postal delive~ comment other than to state the Post Office will provide postal service to the residents. He was not sure why the mailboxes were moved because Etiwanda Avenue is not being widened in that location, but merely replacing one curb with another curb. He said the Fire District staff personnel were available to answer questions with respect to the existing homes. He noted the Fire District' indicated the current dirt road is probably not the best maintained for serviceability. Mr. Buller stated it is a private drive and is the responsibility of the private property owners. With respect to the 23~ acres, he noted the residents were correct that the applicant is not proposing a change or development on that parcel tonight and the Commission therefore had no action before them on that parcel. He said the cu~Tent resolution is conditioned to require sidewalk and street improvements along the front of that parcel be consistent with respect to curb and gutter and sidewalk. Mr. Bullet said staff believes the environmental documentation presented to the Commission is sufficient under the environmental requirements and shows there are no significant impacts that would require the City to deem the project infeasible or unapprovable, He said staff believes the driveway is of sufficient capacity to serve the vehicle trip generations onto Etiwanda Avenue. He noted the applicants do not want their new driveway tom up for future utility access, therefore, they will provide the ability for the parcels which are not a part of this project to get access without having to tear up the improvements, Chairman McNiel asked if it would cover all utilities including telephone. Mr. Bullet believed the applicant has indicated he would include all utilities, Chairman McNiel felt the potential alteretion of the sidewalk, potential relocation of dumpstere, and light covetings for glare could be handled by staff. Mr. Buller suggested a condition be added that the landscaping and sidewalk and trash enclosure locations adjacent to the existing homes along Chervil Street be subject to City Planner review and approval. He said he would be sure the properly owners are notified of that decision. Chairman McNiel asked if that would include the property-adjacent landscaping. Mr. Buller responded affirmatively. Commissioner Stewart suggested that Fire Distdct personnel respond to the residents' comments. Ralph Cra ne, Fire Marshal, stated he visited the site eadier in the day after being contacted by the residents along Chervil Street. He said the support of the Fire District is a standard conceptual support. He observed them are a lot of places in the District that am existing non-conforming: and any time those areas can enhance their existing water supply or access, it is a benef~ to the emergency services that can be provided. He said he directed the questions related to fire hydrants to Cucamonga County Water District, as they are the proper agency to address hydrant issues and water supply issues with the individual property owners. He also noted that several suggestions were made to the property owners regarding things they could do immediately to improve the Fire District's ability to respond rapidly and those suggestions am not dependent upon the project itself. He said that includes putting addresses on the existing homes that don't have addresses on them, removing the limbs on some of the trees that may block access, and grading the road to allow for faster response. He stated that the Fire District definitely feels sprinklemd residences ara a lower fire dsk than a grassy vineyard left to grow. He said the Fire District has no issues that have not been satisfied on the project being proposed; but they do have concerns with the existing residences, which were addressed to those owners. Planning Commission Minutes -7- January 23, 2002 .. Commissioner Mannerino stated this is one of the areas of the City that is in transition. He said it is difficult because Etiwanda continues to be the more rural part of the City and it is now changing as the whole City has changed. He said he has reminded people on several occasions that he used to shoot rabbits where City Hall now sits. He thought it may have been better if there had been another meeting between the developer and the residents on Chervil Street; however, he felt the primary thrust of the problem is that the current residents do not want apartments and medium density structures around their homes. He observed that that the area is zoned for that use and has been so zoned for at least 20 years. He said that anyone who buys the property will build the maximum number of units that it is zoned for because that is how you make money in real estate. He felt that if this developer does not build, it will be another developer and it will be high density housing around the current residents because that is how the area is zoned. He saw nothing that would negate a Negative Declaration with the conditions that were being imposed. He felt there was some more detail that may be worked out such as site changes and landscaping and he urged the developer to continue his dialogue to adjust the tract and make it more palatable to the residents and he thought Mr. Previty will do so. Commissioner Mannerino felt it is a project which complies with the standards and he noted that even some of the residents have commented that it is nice looking. He supported the project with adjacent landscaping and the additional conditions proposed by Mr. Buller. Commissioner Stewart concun'ed with Commissioner Mannerino. She also felt the project could have benefited from another neighborhood meeting to iron out some of the things. She was comfortable with the fire and safety issues that the Fire District discussed. She said the bottom line is that the property is zoned Medium and that is how it will be developed. She supported the project with the additional suggested conditions to address the identified issues subject to City Planner approval. Commissioner Macias stated the land use designation has been that way for a long time and withstood public scrutiny during the recently approved General Plan. It said it is unfortunate that there are often homeowners stuck in this kind of a situation. He agreed with Commissioner Mannerino that this is a time of change and this is an area that has been struck for change. Taken as a whole, he felt the project benefits the City as a whole. He noted there are going to be some losers, and that is because of the change and movement that the City is going in. He supported the project. Mr. Buller observed that Planning Condition 7 of the Conditional Use Permit resolution already provides that additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the interior project perimeter adjacent to the existing single-family residences subject to City Planner approval. He felt the minutes will reflect that the intent is to screen out the visibility from the upstairs windows of the project's buildings into the neighbors' properties. He said staffwill be looking forevergreen trees and shrubs to do that. He stated staff would also be looking for the type of plant materials that would deter people from wanting to get close to the block wall from the apartment side to reduce the potential for graffiti. He suggested adding a condition regarding lighting to limit free-standing lights to a maximum of 15 feet, prohibit security lighting fixtures from projecting above the fascia or roofline, and shield all lighting to confine light spread within the project boundaries. He also suggested adding a condition that final sidewalk locations and the trash enclosure location immediately adjacent to Chervil Street be subject to City Planner review' and approval. He asked if the Commissioners wished to add a condition with respect to utility connections, noting that the applicant had gone on record that they will do it because it will benefit the project. Commissioner Mannerino stated that Jf the applicant had indicated a willingness to do it, a condition should be added. Mr. Bullet suggested the applicant respond. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 23, 2002 · . Mr. Previty said they did not necessarily agree to stub to each residence. He said the concern of the residents was that they felt their zoning would be changing in the near future to conform to the General Plan and they thought the Forecast project would prevent them from developing as a multi- family project in the future. He agreed to stub the utilities at a common point on the south property line of Mr. Glover and Mr. Rusling's preperty. He noted that properties, along Chervil Street can access from Etiwanda Avenue and said he would even go so far as to stub for additional water and sewer lines for them because of the high spot in the read for Chervil Street. He was agreeable to any condition that would reflect that agreement. Mr. Buller suggested inserting a condition that the applicant shall provide underground utility connections to the lots surrounded by the proposed project pursuant to an agreement between the owners of this project and the interior lots. He suggested that the agreement provide that the applicant would be reimbursed for the portion of the cost of the utility connections that would represent the benefit pro-rata share provided to the lots surrounded by the project. He said that way the project proponent and the residents would have to determine where the best point is and the cost. Mr. Previty said he was not proposing that he be reimbursed. Chairman McNiel felt the wise thing to do would be to put the stubs in where they need to be. Mr. Buller suggested the condition then read that the applicant shalJ provide connections to the lots. Chairman McNiel thought it should be tO the property lines. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, asked if the Commission was speaking only of water and sewer, Chairman McNJel stated he was thinking all utilities. commissioner Stewart agreed. commissioner Mannerino stated they were talking about water, sewer, gas, and electric. commissioner Stewart agreed. Chairman McNiel added telephone and cable. Mr. Previty said they would be amenable to such a condition assuming that the regulating agencies are agreeable. Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing. He noted that there had been a discussion regarding the wall and noted the applicant agreed to provide either view fencing ora block wall. He asked that staff clarify which the homeowners would prefer. Mr. Buller suggested modifying Planning condition 2 to provide for either a wrought iron fence or wall subject to City Planner review and approval. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 with modifications to clarify the lighting requirements and provide for City Planner approval of the wall, sidewalk and trash enclosure locations, and underground utility connections. Motion carrfed by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 23, 2002 ', AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY - carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY pLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUB'I-r15716- FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. -A public hearing to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approving the Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the proposed project known as Victoria Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land. The project site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan and is generally bounded by future Church Street to the north,Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171- 22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43. G. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01.-02 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC.- A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed review of a master plan for a project known as Victoria Gardens, a mixed-use development consisting of appreximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses, as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land. The project site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201- 30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43. Related files: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716. H. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA coMMuNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC.- A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Center to Mixed Use and modifying various text sections and graphics in the community Plan to accommodate the proposed project known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west- APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43. Related files: Development Agreement 01-02 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716. I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUB'I-r15716 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC.- A request to subdivide approximately 147acres of land into 97 parcels and 39 lettered lots (private and public streets) to accommodate the proposed project known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, 1-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN: 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23; and 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36. Related files: Development Agreement 01-02 and Victoda community Plan Amendment 01-O1. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report with respect to the Environmental Impact Report and indicated the latest version of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan was in front of the commissioners as well as pages to indicate that the Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard and EtJwanda Avenue/San Bemardino Avenue (4th Street) intersections would be switched from the unavoidable impacts section to be mitigated. Planning Commission Minutes -10- January 23, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. (~c~-- ~ ~'// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17. A. Recitals. 1. Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 20, 2001 and January 17, 2002, the applicant conducted neighborhood meetings, which was attended by 8 and 9 residents, respectively. 3. On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng and approved the application. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this Council. 5. On March 6, and continued to Mamh 20, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on Mamh 6, and March 20, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 02-17 and 02-18, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and an approximate depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION Mamh 20, 2002 Page 2 b. Eight existing single-family detached residences, not a part of the proposed project, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site which take access from Etiwanda Avenue via dirt roads. The I-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development. To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved for a 272 multi-family residential development, and c. The application contemplates a condominium subdivision of one lot for the development of 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. e. On April 6, 1981, the City Council adopted a General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which included a land use designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for the subject property and the surrounding neighborhood. f. According to the Fire Marshal cf the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct the proposed project will benefit the community by eliminating a fire hazard (grass fields) and install a water supply and fire hydrant system. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the tentative tract is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or the habitat; and e. The design of the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3, above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to all conditions of approval contained in the Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 02-17 and 02-18, attached hereto. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION March 20, 2002 Page 3 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Forecast Corporation that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the previsions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Forecast Corporation at the address identified in City records. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2001-00557 TO CONSTRUCT 340 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, 29 AND A PORTION OF 17. A. Recitals. 1. Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. DRC2001-00557, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 20, 2001 and January 17, 2002, the applicant conducted neighborhood meetings, which was attended by eight and nine residents respectively. 3. On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and approved the application. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this Council. 5. On March 6, and March 20, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on March 6, and March 20, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 02-17 and 02-18, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and an approximate depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION Mamh 20, 2002 Page 2 b. Eight existing single-family detached residences, not a part of the proposed project, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site which take access from Etiwanda Avenue via dirt roads. The 1-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commemial development. To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved for a 272 multi-family residential development, and c. The application applies to the development of 340 apartments on 24.2 acres of land within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. e. On April 6, 1981, the City Council adopted a General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which included a land use designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for the subject property and the surrounding neighborhood. f. According to the Fire Marshal of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District the proposed project will benefit the community by eliminating a fire hazard (grass fields) and install a water supply and fire hydrant system. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare er materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The development of the proposed project will not cause a significant traffic impact on the surrounding area; and e. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or the habitat; and f. The design of the project will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3, above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to all conditions of approval contained in the Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 02-17 and 02-18, attached hereto. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION March 20, 2002 Page 3 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Forecast Corporation that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Forecast Corporation at the address identified in City records. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve a resolution adopting the updated General City Master Plan of Drainage Report, and that City Council approve a resolution establishing an updated drainage improvement fee for all development within the General City Local Drainage Area. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The General City Local Drainage Area of the City encompasses that area generally west of Deer Creek Channel. It is intended to address any area of the City that is outside a master planned development such as Victoria or Terra Vista, or not included in an drainage assessment district, or outside the Etiwanda area that due to its unique drainage requirements has its own master plan. The Master Plan of Drainage performs three objectives. First it identifies those areas of the City where nonexistent drainage improvements are necessary. That necessity is based on a need to protect the City from flooding. Secondly, it addresses a need to provide drainage improvements to accommodate future development. And third, it identifies facilities needed to relieve existing streets and drainage facilities that are overtaxed. In 1985 the City revised its General City Drainage Fee to $5,000 per acre. Since that time the fee has remained unchanged. Recently the City reviewed and updated its master plan study for the General City area and based on the adjustment of proposed drainage facilities sizes and locations, as well as the update of the cost of installing those facilities, has calculated an updated fee amount of $15,300 per acre. This amount represents a fair share amount for development in the General City drainage area. The drainage fee is the developers fair share cost of the General City drainage improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE March 20, 2002 Page 2 The resolution provides this fee will be adjusted on an annual basis according to the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles. Respectfully submitted, William-.:J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:dlw Attachments RE OLU ,ON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES (FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Ordinance No. 286 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging a General City Area Drainage Improvement Fee; and WHEREAS, a master plan of drainage study, and subsequent updates to said study, of the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in the General City Local Drainage Area, along with an analysis of the need for new development was conducted, and said study set forth the relationship between new development, the needed facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements. The update to said study,, entitled "General City Area Master Plan of Drainage", was prepared by DGA, is dated 2001, and was adopted on March 20, 2002; and WHEREAS, the "Updated General City Master Plan of Drainage Report" and the "General City Area Drainage Fees Adjustment - 2001", was available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. The purpose of this fee is to finance drainage facilities to reduce the impacts of flooding caused by new development, within the General City Local Drainage Area; B. The drainage fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in the "General City Area Master Plan of Drainage"; C. There is a need in this described impact area for drainage facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed, but new development has not contributed its fair share towards these facility costs and said facilities have been called for in or are consistent with the City's Public Health and Safety Element of its General Plan; D. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts on development for which the corresponding fee is charged, and, also there is a RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in the study referred to above; E. The cost estimates set forth in the "General City Area Drainage Fees Adjustment-2001" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: 1. Definitions. For purposes of this resolution: (a) "Benefit area" is that property which is generally tributary to that particular drainage facility. (b) "Net area" is the net of the area of the entire parcel, after exclusion of the area of all public street and highway rights-of-way and public lands, with respect to which a Building Permit is issued. 2. A drainage improvement fee shall be assessed upon approval of a tentative map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel.map, director reviews, site approval, location and development plan, conditional use permit, or the issuance of a building permit for development in the General City Local Drainage Area and shall be paid either prior to the recording of a subdivision map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, in the benefit area depicted and described in the "General City Area Master Plan of Drainage". When fees are collected upon the issuance of a building permit, the amount of the fee and the area for which the fee shall be considered paid shall be determined by the Building Official. When fees are collected prior to the recording of a final or parcel map, the amount of the fee and the area for which the fee shall be considered paid shall be determined by the City Engineer. In either case, the Building Official or the City Engineer shall determine if the development lies within this benefit area, the type of development and the corresponding fee to be charged in accordance with this resolution. 3. Fee. The fee structure shall apply to all development in the benefit area and shall equal $15,300.00 per net acre. 4. Funds. Fees collected shall be placed into a separate fund designated for the construction of the applicable drainage facility. 5. Use of Fee. The fee shall be solely used to pay (1) for the described public facilities to be constructed by the City; (2) for reimbursing the City for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City; or (3) to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 the "General City Area Master Plan of Drainage", where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects. 6. Fee Review. The City Council shall review and adjust this fee to determine whether the fee amounts are reasonable related to the impacts of developments whether the described public facilities are still needed. This fee shall be adjusted on January 1 of each year by the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles of January I of that year in proportion to a base index of 7228 (November 12, 2001). RESOLUTION NO. ~)~:~ -' ~ ~,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that the public health and safety require that adequate flood control and drainage facilities accompany additional land development; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the General City Area Master Plan of Drainage Report; and WHEREAS, minor alterations of a technical nature have occurred since that adoption which have warranted a need for the City Council to adopt an updated version of that plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council adopts the updated General City Area Master Plan of Drainage Report. SECTION 2: That the City Engineer may make minor modifications of a technical nature to said Plan and Policy upon more detailed reviews of the physical characteristics and hydrology/hydraulic analyses within the General City Area. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~O~UI~TY $ fRe r TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner DATE: March 20, 2002 SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Ralph M. Lewis Park: · Construction of the park is complete. The maintenance period is proceeding well. Lewis is anticipating a grand opening celebration on May 11,2002. Heritage Park: · Construction of the tot lot is proceeding well. The interior walls and irrigation system have been completed and the play equipment is being installed. Barring inclement weather, that would slow construction, it is anticipated that the tot lot will be completed by the end of April. Rancho Etiwanda Park: · Construction has begun and the contractor is continuing to grade the site and is completing the installation of the sewer and storm drain systems. CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 West Beryl Park: · After weeks of negotiation with SANBAG regarding the damage along the south property line of the Park due to the freeway construction, the City received a check from Yeager Construction, in the amount of $17,250.00, to cover the repairs. Windrows Park: · The 13th Annual Arbor Day Celebration was held at the park on March 11~. After the award presentation, two 3r~ grade classes from Windrows Elementary School planted four Camphor trees in the park adjacent to the school. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: · Golden Follies Senior Talent Showcase, Saturday, March 23, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. The cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Montclair, Ontario, Chino and Upland will all participate in the annual Golden Follies Senior Talent Showcase at Montclair Senior Citizens Center. Representing Rancho Cucamonga will be our own singing cowboy, Vern Acree, the singing duo of Larry Williams and Geraldine Homart and several dancers from our Line Dance Class. Tickets for this fun-filled event will be sold at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center for $2.00 each. Refreshments and door prizes are included in the pdce of admission. · Senior Citizens Fine Art Show, Saturday, April 6. The Senior Center is now accepting registrations for the Annual Senior Citizens Fine Art Show. This Fine Art Show is a no.n- juried art competition featuring artwork made of the following media: oil/acrylic, watercolodpastel, mixed media, sculpture, photography and graphite. Staff is working closely with the Upland Art Association to make this year's Art Show the best ever. The Art Show will feature demonstrations, entertainment, refreshments and an awards ceremony. Registrations will be accepted through April 1 · Spring Fling, Thursday, April 18, 10:00 a.m. Come to the Senior Center and help celebrate the annual spdng event with musical entertainment, refreshments and games. A Spring Bonnet Parade will follow the formal program. This event is co-sponsored with the V.I.P. Club. · Tax Assistance - Once again this year trained AARP tax-preparers will be available at the Senior Center to help residents prepare their tax forms. Assistance will be available on Tuesday and Friday afternoons from noon until 4:00 p.m. through April 12, 2002. Reservations are required for this popular free service. · Members of the Senior Advisory Committee will hold the Senior Legislative Election at the Senior Center on March 12, 2002. The Senior Legislative is made up of 40 Senior Senators and 80 Senior Assembly members, elected as non-partisan representatives of the elderly in their area. Elections are held every two years. -2- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 · The next meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee will be held on Monday, March 25, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Currently the two major issues that the Committee is addressing is funding for a new senior center and the planning of a Conference on Aging. Trips and Tours: · Solvang, March 20, 2002. Step into this quaint Danish village and enjoy all the sights, sounds, and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at your leisure and explore the Scandinavian import shops and bakeries of Solvang. · Carlsbad Flower Fields, April 30, 2002. Nestled high on the hillside overlooking the Pacific Ocean, the flower fields at Carlsbad Ranch bloom annually into a 50-acre rainbow of bright ranunculus flowers. We'll take a guided tour with a wagon ride through the fields. You can shop, have lunch (on your own) or mine for gemstones; there's something for everybody. · California Strawberry Festival, May 18, 2002. The delicious heart-shaped fruit of Oxnard is ripe and the 19th Annual California Strawberry Festival is ready to tempt the taste buds of Southern Californians everywhere. One of the nation's most popular weekend celebrations pays tasty tribute to the luscious fruit garnered from the City's bountiful 6,600 berry acres. Presented by the California Strawberry Festival Committee, this multi-faceted event serves up a menu of delectable strawberry delights from strawberry pizza and shortcake to chocolate dipped strawberries and much more. Along with the great food there will be non- stop entertainment and participatory activities for berry lovers of all ages. · Downtown Disney, June 8, 2002. We'll get you there then you're on your own to enjoy one of Disney's newest attractions. Tucked between Disneyland and California Adventure, Downtown Disney offers fabulous food, great entertainment and shops galore featuring the "VVorld of Disney" store - the second largest collection of Disney merchandise. Human Services: · Senior Safety, Mamh 26, 2002, 10:00 a.m. Project Sister Sexual Assault Crisis & Prevention Service's will present a frae workshop on Senior Safety. They will cover issues on how to increase awareness and personal safety as well as what one can do to improve the secudty of your home. Registration required. · Managina Your Health - San Bernardino County Public Health Nurses will present a free six-week workshop on Managing Your Health. They will cover areas in muscle relaxation, identifying health problems and goal setting. This series will run from March 22"d through May 31, 2002, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Registration is required. · Fibromyalgia Workshop - The Arthritis Foundation will offer a 7-week self-help course for individuals who suffer from Fibromyalgia. The class is designed to teach people how to take a more active role in their health care. It will offer information on pain control, relaxation, exercise, fatigue and depression. Sessions will be held at the Center from April 2nd through May 14, 2002. Registration is required. · Personal Safety/Self-Defense Class for Seniors, April 2 & 9, 2002, 10:00 a.m. Project Sister Sexual Assault Crisis & Prevention Services will offer safety awareness to both male and -3- CiTY COUNCI[ PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 female seniors. Participants will learn how to develop assertiveness skill, learn self-defense techniques and reduce the risk for becoming a victim of crime. Registration required. · Senior Job Counseling - The Senior Employment Program, sponsored by the Department of Aging and Adult Services, will offer free job counseling, on-site recruitment and 20 hours a week paid training to seniors, ages 55 and older. This senior is available every second and fourth Thursday of the month at the Senior Center from 9:00 a.m. until 12-noon. Volunteer Services: · The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usage for the month of January and year to date. MONTH: January 2002 YEAR TO DATE # of # of Hours $ Value # of # of Hours $ Value :Volunteers Volunteers Administration 5 15 $210 5 15 $210 Sports 430 2,726 $38,164 430 2,726 $38,164 Senior and 57 256 $3,584 57 256 $3,584 Human Services Special 7 14 $196 7 14 $196 Events Youth 47 216 $3,024 47 216 $3,024 Programs Total 546 3,227 $45,178 546 3,227 $45,178 *Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour. Teens: · Teen Center - Dudng the month of February 2002, 520 teens participated in activities at the Teen Center. We anticipate that during the month of March this number will increase to over 600 youngsters. · The Teen Center Homework Room is being used everyday. Approximately 230 - 250 youngsters have used the computers in the room to complete their homework. Staff is currantly developing a tutoring program to assist the teens. Staff feels this type of assistance will be well received by the teens. · Teen Spring Break Trip - Teens will be going on a spring field trip to Scandia -4- Cll~ COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE5 UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 Amusement Park on Wednesday April 3, 2002, from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Staff anticipates that over 60 youth will attend this fun spring activity. · The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC), TRAC's twice-monthly babysitting service Night on the Town is going very strong and is usually at capacity. This program continues to grow in popularity and attendance. During the month of February 90 youngsters were taken care by our young TRAC volunteers. Over 40 TRAC teens participate in our monthly meetings. · The Teen Workshop Series - Future workshops include: the annual Career Expo on March 21, (anticipated attendance is 700 youth) and a Parent/Teen Communication Workshop that is scheduled for April 27, 2002. · The Spruce Park Skate Facility is being used on a daily basis, weather permitting. Staff has been making appearances at the skate facility on a weekly basis checking to ensure that safety equipment is being worn by the youngsters using the facility. The Community Services Department and the Police Department offered a safety awareness class to youth who were ticketed for not using proper safety gear at the facility. Youth that attended the two-hour class would have their ticket suspended by the court and would not have to pay a fine. Staff continues to work with the Police Department in developing a safety outreach program for skate boarders. It's estimated that 4,700 youngsters utilized the skate facility from mid-February through the end of March. Youth Activities: · Plavschool enrollment is up; 2 new Letter Learners classes were added this session. We have approximately 620 children registered in the City's Playschool program. · The Mobile Recreation Program Fun on the Run is going strong. The program served over 620 youth for the month of mid-February to the end of March. Staff is developing and implementing a fee-based rental program for the public/businesses. The schedule for the Mobile Recreation Unit is as follows: Monday - Bear Gulch Park, Tuesday - Old Town Park, Wednesday - Hermosa Park, Thursday - Mountain View Park, Friday - Windrows Park. Youth Events: · Kids Fest - March 30, 2002 - A great event just to celebrate being a kid! We'll have the best fun zone around with a mega slide, moon bouncers, game booths, hands-on-crafts, obstacle courses, visits from Peter Cottontail and free bags of candy for the youngsters (while supplies last). The event runs from 10:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. at Red Hill Community Park. Grants: · Our new program, Teen Connection is operating on the local high school campuses. Staff is being well received on campus by the students, teachers and administrators. The program operates during school lunch hours on the following days: Tuesdays - -5- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 Etiwanda High School; Wednesdays - Rancho Cucamonga High School; and Thursdays - Alta Loma High School. · Youth Enrichment Services (YES) - Staff has submitted a Request Funding Proposal (RFP) to the Children and Families Commission for San Bernardino County for continued funding for the next two years (July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2004) for this highly successful program. New to this proposal, is a collaboration with the Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA, to offer a new element to the YES Program, a monthly Prime Time Families First activity that will be available to participants from the Y's child care program. Through a collaborative effort with the Commission and a number of other agencies the YES Program will be participating in a Health and Safety Fair at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center on Saturday April 20, 2002, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Families will be able to come to this event and learn everything there is to know about young children, ages 0 to 5 and find out what services/programs are available in the community to assist them. Youth Sports: · The next meeting Df the Sports Advisory Committee is scheduled for Apdl 11, 2002. Field request materials for fall/winter 2002 (August 1 through January 31, 2003) are due at this meeting. · The table below summarizes vouth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 400 3-5/boys & girls 40 Roller Hockey 153 6-13/boys & girls 16 Basketball 950 6-15/boys & girls 122 Track and Field 100 6-13/boys & girls N/A Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates soort fields for non-profit oraanized vouth sport leagues. For the reporting pedod, 11 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 188,767 participants and spectators enjoying our parks. RC Family Sports Center: · The table below and on the next page provides dromin/oDen Dlav participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 1,089 Youth Basketball 1,191 Adult Racquetball 517 Youth Racquetball 41 -6- CiI~' COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 Activity # Participants Adult Volleyball 96 Youth Volleyball 49 Jazzercise 1,149 · The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity I # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Basketball 110 Adult/Males 11 Basketba 3-on-3 30 Adult/Males 6 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for men and women for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,304 144 Male/Female Flag Football 100 10 Male Tennis 28 N/A Male/Female Soccer 644 46 Male/Female · Four adult softball tournaments are scheduled for the month of March and three for the month of April 2002, at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex. Community Wide Special Events: · Staff is busy gearing up for our springtime special events that are just around the corner. Our first community wide special event of the year is Cinco de Mayo that is co-sponsored with Northtown Housing and Development Corporation. This event will be held in early May at Old Town Park. Cultural and Performing Arts: · Rehearsals for The Sound of Music are now underway and the cast is gearing up for the April 12th opening. The cast consists of 70 youth ranging in age from 4 to 20. The City will present eight performances over two weekends at Alta Loma High School Auditorium running from April 12th through April 21st. Approximately 40 parents have volunteered their services to participate in such activities as: stage crew, publicity, program ad sales, make-up and wardrobe, concession sales and opening and closing night parties. · A summer production is in the early stages of planning, with performance dates at Alta Loma High School still pending confirmation (anticipated timeframe is the end of July/beginning of August). A show has not yet been selected, but with such a tremendous response to The Sound of Music auditions, staff is looking at shows that will provide more featured roles for the wealth of talented youth in our community. -7- CilY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILIllES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 · An Audition Workshop will be scheduled prior to the summer production audition dates (early June) to prepare those interested in theatre for a winning audition. Performing Arts Classes: · A new session of classes is now underway, offering the ongoing, existing programs: Talent Connection and Vocal Expression and Performance. All classes are offered at Lions West Community Center. New classes and workshops in the performing and visual arts are expected to be added to the summer roster of activities. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides information on park reservations for the month of February 2002: Shelter Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed Rentals Red Hill 922 18 20 77 Community Park Heritage Community 0 0 0 0 Park* Hermosa Park 180 6 8 19 Coyote Canyon Park 84 2 3 9 Civic Center 200 1 1 13 Courtyard Total 1,386 27 32 118 * No rentals due to scheduled construction. Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · E(~uestrian Center usage for the months of March 2002 is shown in the table below. Group Date Event/Time Frame Alta Loma Riding Club March 7t~ Board Meeting/7:30-9:30 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club March 17t~ Play Day/8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. 4-H Club March 18t~ General Meeting/7:00-9:00 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club March 19t~ General Meeting/6:30-9:30 p.m. Rising Stars of Equestrian March 23ru Disabled Easter Show/8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Therapy (RSET) Park and Recreation Commission: · At the Commission's regular March 21, 2002, meeting the following items will be discussed/acted upon: ~' Senior Advisory Committee update. > Sports Advisory Committee update. -8- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 Status on legislative efforts for the Senior Center Project. Update on programming and two-year goals for the Cultural Arts Program. Update and status of the Proposition 40 - State Parks Bond Act. Status of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating to equestrian facilities. > Review of a proposed schedule for the review of the Recreation Needs Systems Analysis. > Review of plans for the proposed Napa project. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Foundation's March 12, 2002 regular meeting: Review and consideration of a beard development, strategic planning and funding raising development process and selection of a consultant to lead the process. > Review of existing fundraising samples of theater organizations. > Update on the proposed Performing Arts Center. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · The following activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period: ProVantage Cars Inc - Used Car Sale - Epicenter Special Event Area - February 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2002. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes and Hispanic Lifestyle Magazine - Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Mega Mixer- Epicenter Stadium - February 28, 2002. > Rancho Cucemonga ACE Softball - Opening Ceremonies - Epicenter Stadium - March 2, 2002. > California Association of School Transportation Officials - School Bus Roadeo - Epicenter Special Event Area - March 16 and 17, 2002. · Staff is working with the following organizations for future/tentative bookings at the Epicenter: > Abundant Living Family Church - Easter Services - Epicenter Stadium - March 30 and 31, 2002. > American Cancer Society - Relay for Life - Epicenter Adult Sports Complex Soccer Fields - April 20 and 21, 2002. > Rancho Cucamonga Quakes - Post Game Friendship Rally- Epicenter Stadium - May 5, 2002. > Rancho Cucemonga ACE Softball - Closing Ceremonies- Epicenter Stadium - June 1, 2002. -9- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE MARCH 20, 2002 Daily Bulletin - Inland Valley All Stars Game - Epicenter Stadium - June 3 and 4, 2002. Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremonies- Epicenter Stadium- June 12, 2002. Mt. High Entertainment -Concert Series - Epicenter Stadium - spring/summer 2002 (Tentative). ed, Community Services Director City Engineer hiCOMMSERV~Council&BoardsICityCouncilIStaffReports~.OO21update3.20.O2, doc -10-