Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002/04/17 - Agenda Packet
CITY RANC ONGA 105q0 Cly~c-~Center~Dnve Rar,cho Cucamonga, GA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1ST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. APRIL 17, 2002 A,qency, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ............................... Member Grace Curatalo ......................... Member Bob Dutton .............................. Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Nieeting ...................... Council Chambers City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives ail such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander ., Biane , Curatalo__., Dutton__, and Williams__ B..~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamations to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Youth Basketball Girls Division "B" and "C" for winning the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation (SCMAF) Championships. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April as Child Abuse Prevention Month. 3. A presentation to the City Council by the California Association of School Transportation Officials (CASTO) thanking the Council for their support of CASTO's School Bus Roadeo held annually at the Epicenter Special Event Area. 4. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of the Coca Cola Bottling Company's 100th Anniversary. 5. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "National Infant Immunization Week," April 14 - 20, 2002, and the month of May 2002 as "Toddler Immunization Month." C..~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D.~. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register March 27 through April 3, 2002, and Payroll ending March 24, 2002 for the total amount of $3,244,213.12. City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 2 2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 24 31,2002. 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 30 Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, southwest corner, Landscape Improvements, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 11103165650/1318110-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-115 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 38 Construction of Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Street, to be funded from Account No. 11763035650/1153176 (Measure I). RESOLUTION NO. 02-116 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 45 Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and Heliman Avenue from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard Landscape Improvements, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account Nos. 11103165650/1319110-0 and 11103165650/1320110-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-117 48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROYEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 53 Phase lA of CFD 01-01, to be funded from Account No. 16123035650/1442612-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-118 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA FOR PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 7. Approval to authorize the advertisin~ of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 57 Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase I (4"' to 350' south of 8th) Completion of the Street Widening and AC Surface Course Paving; and Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase 2 (350' south of 8th to north of Railroad) Storm Drain, Street Widening, Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting, Utility Underground and Railroad Grade Crossing Improvements, to be funded from Redevelopment Agency Funds, Account No. 26408015602. RESOLUTION NO. 02-119 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TH TO 350' SOUTH OF 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' SOUTH OF 8TM TO NORTH OF RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 8. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 65 Park Trash Enclosures in the amount of $44,000.00, funded from Account Nos. 1120305-5650/1240-120-0, 1120305-5650/1241-120-0 & 1120305-5602. RESOLUTION NO. 02-120 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 9. Approval of Change Order No. 2 to CH2MHILL, Inc., for the preparation 70 of a Project Study Report at Arrow Route and the 1-15 Freeway, and appropriate $12,000 from fund balance 1124, to Account No. 1124-303- 5650/1248124-0. 10. Approval of a Resolution to accept control and maintenance over 73 Highland Avenue between East Avenue and Mulberry Street, to be relinquished by the State of California. RESOLUTION NO. 02-121 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ACCEPTING CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND MULBERRY STREET, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11. Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement (CO 02-029) to DPDG Fund 77 I, LLC, for Construction of Wilson Avenue Crossing of Deer Creek Channel for Tract 13851 in accordance with Resolution No. 88-208, and approval to appropriate $522,273.93 from Fund 22 -"Transportation Development." RESOLUTION NO. 02-122 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WILSON AVENUE CROSSING OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 13851 12. Approval of an Application for Grant Funds for a potential Walking 83 Trail/Open Space Project from the State of California Land and Water Conservation Fund Program. RESOLUTION NO. 02-123 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR A POTENTIAL WALKING TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 5 13. Approval for the purchase of computer replacement roll-out items under 86 the annual Downstreaming Program as approved in the budget, to include: Thirteen (13) Hewlett Packard 4100DTN Laser Jet printers with envelope feeders and on-site support packs and fifteen (15) Omnibook XE3 notebooks with on-site support packs from MicroAge Computermart of Diamond Bar in the amount of $66,631.52, funded from Fund 1714-001-5605, and transfer appropriation of $10,942.01 from Fund 1714-001-5605 to 1714-001-5300 for support pack Maintenance Agreements. 14. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement (CO 02-030) for 88 Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities for DRCDR00-76, located on the north side of 6th Street west of Cleveland Avenue, submitted by Riverside Commercial Investors, URA-018. RESOLUTION NO. 02-124 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 6TM STREET WEST OF CLEVELAND AVENUE 15. Approval of an Improvement Agreement (CO 02-031), Improvement 104 Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2001-00275, located on the east side of Helms Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street, submitted by Albert and Betty Gutierrez, Trustee of the Gutierrez Family Trust, dated February 26, 1997. RESOLUTION NO. 02-125 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2001-00275 RESOLUTION NO. 02-126 108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00275 City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 6 16. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the 116 execution of the Contract in the amount of $26,669.50 ($24,245.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal (CO 02- 032), for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development funds, Account No. 11243035650, and appropriate funds from Fund 124, Transportation Systems Development fund balance to Account No. 11243035650. 17. Approval to accept bids and award and authorize the execution of the 119 Contract (CO 02-033) in the amount of $37,110.70 ($33,737,00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal, for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Carnelian Street and LaVine/LaGrande Streets, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development funds, Account No. 11243035650/1281124-0, and appropriate an additional $12,200.00 from Fund 124, Transportation Systems Development fund balance to Account No. 11243035650/1281124-0. 18. Approval of an Agreement (CO 02-034) for the City to acquire an Off- 122 Site Easement Security and Deposit for Tentative Parcel Map 15665, located north of 6th Street, east of Day Creek Channel, submitted by Paragon Santa Anita LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 02-127 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15665, FROM PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 19. Approval to release Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds 125 and accept replacement Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Improvements for Tracts 15711-1 and -2, submitted by RC Homes, LLC, located north and south of Miller Avenue, between East and Etiwanda Avenues. E.~. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No items Submitted. City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED 128 GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 20, 2002 - TO BE CONTINUED TO MAY 15, 2002) RESOLUTION NO. 02-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES (FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 02-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT G.~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REVISE EXEMPTIONS 129 APPLICABLE TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 681 (first reading) 131 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING EXEMPTIONS APPLICABLE TO REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE City Council Agenda April 17, 2002 H.~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. L. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public inpuL 1. TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A review of the '133 request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across local feeder trails where they intersect public streets - APN: 1089-081-01 through 14 and 1089-071-01 through 22. 2. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 194 UPDATE 3. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SISTER 203 CITIES TASK FORCE 4. MOBILE HOME PARK ACCORD UPDATE (Oral) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 11, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Cheek Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181206 3/27/2002 3M COMPANY 620.00 AP - 00181207 3/27/2002 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 444.20 AP-00181208 3/27/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 22.63 AP- 00181209 3/27/2002 ABLAC 294.06 AP- 00181210 3/27/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 286.67 AP- 00181211 3/27/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,216.00 AP- 00181212 3/27/2002 AGA 52.00 AP- 00181213 3/27/2002 ALCORN, RICHARD 193.94 AP- 00181214 3/27/2002 ALEXETERTECHNOLOGIES LLC 1,160.00 AP- 00181214 3/27/2002 ALEXETER TECHNOLOGIES LLC 25.00 AP - 00181215 3/27/2002 ALL WELDING 578.37 AP 00181216 3/27/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 216.51 AP 00181217 3/27/2002 ALPHAGRAPHICS 336.42 AP 00181218 3/27/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 3,500.00 AP 00181219 3/27/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 262.60 AP 00181220 3/27/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 802.89 AP 00181220 3/27/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,842.50 AP 00181220 3/27/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 168.00 AP 00181220 3/27/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 648.00 AP 00181220 3/27/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 648.00 AP 00181221 3/27/2002 ARNOLD, VIVIAN 200.00 AP 00181222 3/27/2002 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 85.23 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 417.00 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 208.50 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 72.94 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 46.65 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 291.03 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,767.94 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 137.76 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 65.00 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 57.20 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 220.39 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 35.54 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 24.04 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 456.33 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 69.29 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CKEDIT UNION 560.00 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 630.84 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION -6.00 AP 00181223 3/27/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 77.67 AP 00181224 3/27/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 590.00 AP 00181224 3/27/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 350.00 AP 00181225 3/27/2002 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 66.81 AP 00181226 3/27/2002 BOGUSKI, REGINA 94.00 AP 00181227 3/27/2002 BROCK, ALLEN 72.51 AP 00181228 3/27/2002 BROWN, MARY 22.00 AP 00181229 3/27/2002 BRUCE, INGRID 155.34 AP 00181230 3/27/2002 BUILD1NG NEWS 145.60 AP 00181231 3/27/2002 CAMPBELL, JOSH 25.00 AP 00181232 3/27/2002 CANIZARES, CHRISTINA 30.00 AP 00181233 3/27/2002 CARLTON OAKS GOLF COURSE 250.16 AP - 00181234 3/27/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 21.55 AP- 00181235 3/27/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 1,000.00 AP - 00181235 3/27/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 480.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00181236 3/27/2002 CHAVEZ, JESUS 107.00 AP-00181237 3/27/2002 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 2,160.00 AP - 00181238 3/27/2002 CLAREMONT CAMERA AND VIDEO INC 495.54 AP- 00181239 3/27/2002 CODE 3 INC 60.31 AP - 00181240 3/27/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 62.38 AP - 00181240 3/27/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 81.46 AP ~ 00181240 3/27/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 33.34 AP - 00181240 3/27/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 10.70 AP - 00181241 3/27/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 199.50 AP- 00181242 3/27/2002 CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES ]NC 1,000.00 AP - 00181243 3/27/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 1,108.53 AP - 00181243 3/27/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 743.48 AP- 00181244 3/27/2002 CORPORATE PRINTERS 522.45 AP - 00181245 3/27/2002 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 8,750.00 AP- 00181246 3/27/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP- 00181247 3/27/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP- 00181248 3/27/2002 CPRS DISTRICT XI 35.00 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 206.44 AP- 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 367.17 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 409.03 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 86.61 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.18 AP- 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 129.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 175.68 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 329.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 128.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 145.59 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 162.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 255.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,322.02 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 198.82 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 139.92 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 747.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 101.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 456.61 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 132.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 196.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 168.18 AP- 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 117.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 176.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 307.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 196.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 129.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 92.68 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 347.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 423.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 121.18 AP - 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 145.59 AP- 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 383.18 AP- 00181249 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 171.18 AP- 00181250 3/27/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,050.00 AP-00181251 3/27/2002 DARE AMERICA 285.00 AP- 00181252 3/27/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 1,515.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 04/09/] Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181253 3/27/2002 DE LA MOP, A, MARIO 120.00 AP- 00181254 3/27/2002 DICK, ERIC 330.00 AP- 00181255 3/27/2002 DICK, ERIC 300.00 AP-00181256 3/27/2002 DIRECTV 27.99 AP-00181256 3/27/2002 DIRECTV 29.39 AP-00181257 3/27/2002 DUFFY, RICK 308.00 AP- 00181258 3/27/2002 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 272.30 AP- 00181259 3/27/2002 DUNN, LESLIE 48.00 AP- 00181260 3/27/2002 ESCOBAR, SANTIAGO 70.00 AP - 00181261 3/27/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 60.29 AP - 00181261 3/27/2002 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 247.78 AP - 00181262 3/27/2002 FATLAND, SANDRA 28.00 AP- 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.49 AP- 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 216.00 AP - 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CO1LP 45.72 AP - 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.84 AP- 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.35 AP- 00181263 3/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.35 AP- 00181264 3/27/2002 FELIPES TAQUERIA 321.63 AP - 00181265 3/27/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 744.72 AP- 00181266 3/27/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 405.90 AP - 00181266 3/27/2002 F[NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP - 00181266 3/27/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 56.70 AP - 00181267 3/27/2002 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS CO 75.00 AP- 00181268 3/27/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 424.27 AP- 00181269 3/27/2002 FLENOY, ANGELIKA 30.00 AP-00181270 3/27/2002 FRANCH1NO, KELLY 55.00 AP- 00181271 3/27/2002 FREEMAN, DEBORAH 33.00 AP- 00181272 3/27/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 150.00 AP- 00181273 3/27/2002 GILLILAND, SOPHI 57.00 AP - 00181274 3/27/2002 GWYNN, JOANN 500.00 AP- 00181275 3/27/2002 HAMBELTON, JIMME 83.00 AP- 00181276 3/27/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 613.86 AP - 00181277 3/27/2002 HAZ-MAT RESPONSE TECHNOLOGIES INC 317.50 AP- 00181278 3/27/2002 HEFFELF1NGER, AMY 42.95 AP- 00181279 3/27/2002 HELTON, JUDITH 225.00 AP- 00181280 3/27/2002 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 561.73 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 169.33 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 10.72 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 14.93 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 20.00 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 259.96 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF. THE 190.77 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 154.66 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF. THE -154.08 AP- 00181281 3/27/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF. THE 42.93 AP - 00181282 3/27/2002 HOSE MAN INC 8.19 AP - 00181282 3/27/2002 HOSE MAN INC 41.12 AP- 00181283 3/27/2002 HUNT, JENNIFER 259.00 AP- 00181284 3/27/2002 HURST, CHERYL 313.50 AP- 00181285 3/27/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 8.63 AP- 00181285 3/27/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 38.84 AP- 00181285 3/27/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 409.41 AP- 00181286 3/27/2002 IBM CORPORATION 838.99 User: ahnnsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181286 3/27/2002 IBM CORPORATION 364.33 AP- 00181286 3/27/2002 IBM CORPORATION 236.93 AP- 00181286 3/27/2002 IBM CORPORATION 473.86 AP-00181286 3/27/2002 IBM CORPORATION 710.80 AP- 00181287 3/27/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 415.38 AP- 00181287 3/27/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 257.95 AP-00181288 3/27/2002 IDBURR 308.90 AP- 00181289 3/27/2002 IDEA ART 80.58 AP-00181290 3/27/2002 IEMA 21.00 AP- 00181291 3/27/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 70.34 AP- 00181292 3/27/2002 INGERSOLL RAND 37,043.10 AP - 00181293 3/27/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 1,065.00 AP - 00181293 3/27/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 193.00 AP- 00181293 3/27/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 1,777.00 AP - 00181294 3/27/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 52.58 AP- 00181295 3/27/2002 INTELLI TECH 860.92 AP- 00181295 3/27/2002 INTELLI TECH 538.75 AP - 00181296 3/27/2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING I 84.47 AP - 00181297 3/27/2002 J D C INC 96,084.90 AP- 00181298 3/27/2002 J MCLOUGHLIN ENG CO 48,903.94 AP- 00181298 3/27/2002 J MCLOUGHLIN ENG CO 24,581.96 AP-00181299 3/27/2002 JOHNS TRAILERS 5,024.00 AP - 00181300 3/27/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 250.00 AP- 00181301 3/27/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 43,915.88 AP- 00181301 3/27/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 634.78 AP - 00181302 3/27/2002 KAUFMAN AND BROAD 1,000.00 AP-00181303 3/27/2002 KB HOME 500.00 AP - 00181304 3/27/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 8.05 AP- 00181305 3/27/2002 KERREY, JULES 560.00 AP- 00181305 3/27/2002 KERREY, JULES 140.00 AP- 00181305 3/27/2002 KERREY, JULES 420.00 AP- 00181306 3/27/2002 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 119.51 AP- 00181307 3/27/2002 KOLA 3,800.00 AP- 00181308 3/27/2002 KONGMEBOHL, B1NG 46.00 AP- 00181309 3/27/2002 LAM, JACK 30.88 AP- 00181310 3/27/2002 LAM, JACK 360.08 AP 00181311 3/27/2002 LANDRY, KENNETH 55.00 AP 00181312 3/27/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 203.70 AP 00181313 3/27/2002 LOS ANGELES TIMES 38.80 AP 00181314 3/27/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP 00181315 3/27/2002 LUS LIGHTHOUSEINC 457.08 AP 00181316 3/27/2002 MADAHAR, DEEPTI 12.00 AP 00181317 3/27/2002 MAKSHANOFF, WILLIAMN 69.35 AP 00181318 3/27/2002 MARRIOTT SUITES DOWNTOWN 777.00 AP 00181319 3/27/2002 MARRIOTT SUITES DOWNTOWN 777.00 AP 00181320 3/27/2002 MARRIOTT SUITES DOWNTOWN 777.00 AP 00181321 3/27/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 694.00 AP 00181322 3/27/2002 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN CO 61.57 AP 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 50.00 AP - 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 35.00 AP- 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00181323 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 04/09/,~ Report:CKAGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 ¥ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181324 3/27/2002 MARTINEZ, SUSAN 50.00 AP- 00181325 3/27/2002 MC ELROY, DIANE 96.00 AP- 00181326 3/27/2002 MIGHTY MOVERS TRAILERS [NC 1,199.94 AP - 00181327 3/27/2002 MILLENNIUM BILTMORE HOTEL 468.54 AP- 00181328 3/27/2002 MILLENNIUM BILTMORE HOTEL 468.54 AP- 00181329 3/27/2002 MILLER, BETTY 27.70 AP- 00181330 3/27/2002 MIRAMAR COLLEGE 72.00 AP- 00181331 3/27/2002 MOBILE MINI [NC 130.38 AP- 00181331 3/27/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46 AP- 00181332 3/27/2002 MOORE, DAVE 200.00 AP-00181333 3/27/2002 MORITA, DUANE 8,145.00 AP - 00181334 3/27/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 237.05 AP - 00181334 3/27/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 9.16 AP - 00181334 3/27/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 537.75 AP - 00181335 3/27/2002 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 13.85 AP- 00181336 3/27/2002 NAFA 415.00 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 137.45 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -6.34 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.40 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1.82 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.42 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPAAUTO PARTS 5.58 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPAAUTO PARTS 6.42 AP- 00181337 3/27/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.59 AP-00181338 3/27/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 23,960.03 AP- 00181339 3/27/2002 NATIONS RENT 158.43 AP- 00181339 3/27/2002 NATIONS RENT 43.10 AP- 00181340 3/27/2002 NBSGOVERNMENTFINANCE GROUP 8,862.44 AP- 00181341 3/27/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 227.00 AP - 00181342 3/27/2002 NOBLE COMPANY, R J 19,073.54 AP- 00181343 3/27/2002 NOBLE COMPANY, R J 2,574.54 AP-00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 198.53 AP- 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 177.75 AP - 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 253.71 AP- 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -4.96 AP- 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 616.18 AP- 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 89.35 AP- 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 22.24 AP - 00181344 3/27/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 99.00 AP - 00181345 3/27/2002 OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF COl 1,286.18 AP- 00181346 3/27/2002 ONTARIO, CITY OF 23,775.75 AP - 00181347 3/27/2002 OPUS WEST CONSTRUTION CORP 1,000.00 AP - 00181347 3/27/2002 OPUS WEST CONSTRUTION CO1LP 1,000.00 AP 00181348 3/27/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 1,477.28 AP 00181349 3/27/2002 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 1,592.55 AP 00181349 3/27/2002 PACIFIC PLUMB[NG SPECIALTIES 34.55 AP 00181350 3/27/2002 PAIZ, RICARDO 76.00 AP 00181351 3/27/2002 PATTON SALES CORP 46.61 AP 00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 84.26 AP 00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 372.33 AP 00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 452.35 AP - 00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 88.21 AP - 00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 486.11 AP-00181352 3/27/2002 PETERMANLUMBER 628.05 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181353 3/27/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 75.00 AP - 00181353 3/27/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 811.78 AP- 00181353 3/27/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 84.68 AP-00181354 3/27/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 100.00 AP- 00181355 3/27/2002 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION INC 135.55 AP- 00181355 3/27/2002 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION INC 65.19 AP - 00181355 3/27/2002 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 9.81 AP- 00181356 3/27/2002 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 101.89 AP-00181357 3/27/2002 PRIMA 55.00 AP- 00181358 3/27/2002 PROACTIVE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION 980.00 AP ~ 00181358 ~3/27/2002 PROACTIVE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION 980.00 AP-00181359 3/27/2002 PROJECT SISTER 349.20 AP- 00181360 3/27/2002 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 93.70 AP - 00181361 3/27/2002 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CA ' 22,461.25 AP- 00181362 3/27/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00181363 3/27/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 308.97 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F 1NC 50.00 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F 1NC 98.48 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F INC 107.92 AP - 00181364 3/27/2002 R H F 1NC 50.00 AP 00181364 3/27/2002 RH FINC 50.00 AP 00181365 3/27/2002 R.W.B. PARTY PROPS INC 867.39 AP 00181366 3/27/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 140.00 AP 00181367 3/27/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 14.99 AP 00181368 3/27/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 300.00 AP 00181369 3/27/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA '500.00 AP 00181369 3/27/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,000.00 AP 00181370 3/27/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIBRARY FOUNDATIO~ 4,205.00 AP 00181371 3/27/2002 RANCHO MINI STORAGE 95.00 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 81.51 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 274.56 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 229.89 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 300.00 AP 00181372 3/27/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 431.33 AP 00181373 3/27/2002 REDINGER, TOM 172.00 AP 00181374 3/27/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP-00181375 3/27/2002 RHICONSULTING 1,024.00 AP- 00181376 3/27/2002 RIVAS, MIGUEL 100.00 AP- 00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 54.31 AP-00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRiNT 40.41 AP- 00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 173.91 AP- 00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 87.28 AP- 00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 87.08 AP- 00181377 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 96.98 AP - 00181378 3/27/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP- 00181379 3/27/2002 RMA GROUP 2,077.00 AP-00181379 3/27/2002 RMA GROUP 652.00 AP- 00181380 3/27/2002 ROCKHURST COLLEGE 390.00 AP - 00181381 3/27/2002 ROCKHURST COLLEGE 395.00 AP- 00181381 3/27/2002 ROCKHURSTCOLLEGE 395.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount. AP- 00181382 3/27/2002 RODRIGUEZ, ALICIA 250.00 AP- 00181383 3/27/2002 gOTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 340.00 AP- 00181383 3/27/2002 gOTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00 AP- 00181384 3/27/2002 ROYCE DIGITAL SYSTEMS 1NC 600.00 AP- 00181385 3/27/2002 S B AND O INC 504.00 AP- 00181386 3/27/2002 S C A C E O 60.00 AP- 00181387' 3/27/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 252.94 AP - 00181388 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 200.00 AP - 00181389 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68 AP - 00181390 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRIC 1,500.00 AP- 00181391 3/27/2002 SANBERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 10,416.67 AP- 00181391 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 40,480.00 AP- 00181391 3/27/2002 SANBERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 14,193.33 AP - 00181391 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 958,091.00 AP- 00181392 3/27/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 2,886.23 AP- 00181393 3/27/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 38.80 AP- 00181393 3/27/2002 SBC/PACIFICBELL 950.08 AP- 00181393 3/27/2002 SBC/PACIFICBELL 38.80 AP- 00181393 3/27/2002 SBC/PACIFICBELL 3,284.97 AP - 00181394 3/27/2002 SCIORT1NO, NICOLAS 70.00 AP - 00181395 3/27/2002 SENSATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS 5,458.00 AP- 00181396 3/27/2002 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES 339.95 AP- 00181397 3/27/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 12,484.24 AP- 00181398 3/27/2002 SIRSPEEDY 153.19 AP- 00181399 3/27/2002 SKILLE, STEVE 71.00 AP ~ 00181400 3/27/2002 SMARTAND FINAL 32.93 AP - 00181400 3/27/2002 SMART AND FINAL 252.64 AP- 00181400 3/27/2002 SMART AND FINAL 116.55 AP- 00181401 3/27/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 713.61 AP- 00181401 3/27/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 266.02 AP - 00181401 3/27/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 156.48 AP- 00181402 3/27/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 30.35 AP- 00181402 3/27/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 295.24 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.88 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.17 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.34 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.39 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.98 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.33 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.51 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 User: ahnnsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.08 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.12 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.77 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.60 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.97 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.71 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.12 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.28 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.39 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.94 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.61 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.27 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.83 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,260.51 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.15 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.43 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.26 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.14 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 172.52 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.48 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.54 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.46 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.40 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.65 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.28 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.87 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I 1.23 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.18 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.29 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.01 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP ~ 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.18 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.32 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.11 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.37 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOP-~IA EDISON 12.67 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.34 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.41 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.58 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.77 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.23 AP - 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.25 AP- 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.84 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.45 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.26 AP 00181406 3/27/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00181407 3/27/2002 SPECIALTY CLEAN1NG SYSTEMS 900.00 AP 00181408 3/27/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 49.65 AP 00181409 3/27/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1,376.00 AP 00181410 3/27/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98 AP 00181410 3/27/2002 STERICYCLEINC 96.98 AP 00181410 3/27/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98 AP 00181410 3/27/2002 STERICYCLE [NC 96.98 AP- 00181411 3/27/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00 AP - 00181412 3/27/2002 STUFFLEBEAN, DAVID 50.00 AP- 00181413 3/27/2002 SUNRISE FORD 48.07 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 04/09/7: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00181413 3/27/2002 SUNRISE FORD 123.81 AP - 00181413 3/27/2002 SUNRISE FORD 48.07 AP- 00181414 3/27/2002 SWEETS CLEAN SWEEP 9,300.00 AP-00181415 3/27/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 661.83 AP- 00181415 3/27/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,424.18 AP- 00181415 3/27/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,780.52 AP- 00181416 3/27/2002 TANNER, O C 192.58 AP-00181417 3/27/2002 TARGET 20.29 AP-00181417 3/27/2002 TARGET 96.10 AP-00181418 3/27/2002 TELEWORKS 3,050.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 89.00 AP-00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIXINTERNATIONAL 67.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 52.00 AP-00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIXINTERNATIONAL 135.00 AP - 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIXINTERNATIONAL 56.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 42.00 AP- 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 125.00 AP - 00181419 3/27/2002 TERM1NIX INTERNATIONAL 30.00 AP - 00181419 3/27/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 40.00 AP- 00181420 3/27/2002 THOMAS, JOHN 240.00 AP- 00181421 3/27/2002 TRANSOFT SOLUTIONS INC 375.00 AP - 00181422 3/27/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE KEGIONAL 13,567.00 AP- 00181423 3/27/2002 U CREGENTS 35.00 AP - 00181424 3/27/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 320.00 AP - 00181424 3/27/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,542.00 AP- 00181424 3/27/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 320.00 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 213.43 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 169.33 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 728.68 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 69.13 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 36.41 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 40.80 AP- 00181425 3/27/2002 UNIF1RSTUNIFORM SERVICE 19.91 AP-00181426 3/27/2002 UNIQUE CREATIONS 26.25 AP- 00181427 3/27/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 28.25 AP-00181428 3/27/2002 UNITED WAY 653.32 AP - 00181429 3/27/2002 UNITED WAY 20.00 AP-00181430 3/27/2002 USPS/PITNEYBOWES 4,500.00 AP 00181431 3/27/2002 VARNEY, CHUCK 19.00 AP 00181431 3/27/2002 VARNEY, CHUCK 2.50 AP 00181431 3/27/2002 VARNEY, CHUCK 21.00 AP 00181432 3/27/2002 VDO NORTH AMERICA 8,900.00 AP 00181432 3/27/2002 VDO NORTH AMERICA 915.79 AP 00181432 3/27/2002 VDO NORTH AMERICA 3,200.00 AP 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.65 AP 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.55 AP 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.24 AP 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.10 AP 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 38.75 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 107.43 AP - 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.46 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.10 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porh-ait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 107.43 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.47 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.67 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.60 AP-00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 53.78 AP-00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 87.82 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.08 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.28 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 65.84 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 53.17 AP - 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.06 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VEILIZON CALIFORNIA 419.07 AP-00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 38.75 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.46 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.27 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.72 AP- 00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 26.45 AP-00181433 3/27/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.32 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 131.63 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 12.06 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 19.88 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 26.37 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 26.37 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 26.37 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 58.96 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 47.95 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 82.02 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 70.20 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 16.72 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 16.72 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 28.44 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VEKIZON WIRELESS 27.51 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 44.75 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 36.14 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 71.97 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 48.14 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 99.08 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 71.72 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 39.43 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 48.10 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 117.91 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 207.71 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.68 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 24.66 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.08 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.57 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 23.39 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 47.30 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 74.50 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 74.95 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 27.51 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.68 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.75 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 60.40 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.68 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 54.18 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 30.08 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 24.66 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 74.95 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 66.44 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 31.76 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.08 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 101.94 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 26.38 AP - 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.90 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 22.90 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.08 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 16.72 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 27.37 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 732.78 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 45.17 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 11.30 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.39 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 31.35 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 79.24 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 70.69 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.12 AP-00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 16.72 AP ~00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 26.37 AP- 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.33 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 16.72 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.36 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 139.64 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VEPdZON WIRELESS 26.37 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 74.95 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWlRELESS 16.72 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 83.41 AP 00181436 3/27/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 38.82 AP 00181437 3/27/2002 VERMEERCALIFORNIA 25,831.45 AP 00181438 3/27/2002 VILLAGOMEZ, CHAP, LEI 27.74 AP 00181439 3/27/2002 VISTAPA1NT 89.71 AP 00181440 3/27/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP 00181441 3/27/2002 VOSS, CAROLYNN 64.24 AP 00181442 3/27/2002 VULCAN CALMAT ASPHALT 432.39 AP- 00181443 3/27/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 191.44 AP- 00181443 3/27/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 63.19 AP-00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE 38.70 AP - 00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE 310.10 AP- 00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE 298.67 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 17:4 /2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE 358.81 AP - 00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE t41.77 AP- 00181444 3/27/2002 WAXIE 51.63 AP- 00181445 3/27/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 3,781.80 AP - 00181445 3/27/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 51.12 AP - 00181445 3/27/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 3,160.08 AP- 00181446 3/27/2002 WEST, AMBER 34.67 AP- 00181447 3/27/2002 WHITE CAP 106.46 AP- 00181448 3/27/2002 WHITE, LARRY 70.00 AP- 00181449 3/27/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 33,055.00 AP- 00181450 3/27/2002 WILLIAMS, DIANE 53.63 AP - 00181451 3/27/2002 X PECT FIRST AID AND SAFETY 79.52 AP-00181452 3/27/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89 AP- 00181452 3/27/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 1,131.38 AP-00181452 3/27/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 9,917.25 AP-00181452 3/27/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 166.47 AP-00181453 3/27/2002 YEE, LARRY 104.00 AP- 00181454 3/27/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 146.00 AP - 00181455 3/28/2002 IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 185,321.79 AP- 00181455 3/28/2002 IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 1,344.66 AP ~ 00181455 3/28/2002 IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 245.00 AP- 00181456 3/28/2002 JENK]NS, TIFFANY 343.93 AP- 00181467 3/28/2002 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 210.90 AP- 00181493 3/28/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,720.40 AP 00181510 3/28/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00 AP 00181514 4/3/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB ]NC 13.98 AP 00181514 4/3/2002 A AND K 30 M]N PHOTO LAB ]NC 5.95 AP 00181515 4/3/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12.93 AP 00181516 4/3/2002 AGENG1NEERINGINC 559.96 AP 00181516 4/3/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 311.55 AP 00181516 4/3/2002 AG ENGINEERING ]NC 559.96 AP 00181517 4/3/2002 ALL CITIES ENTERPRISES 425.00 AP 00181518 4/3/2002 ALTIMA TECHNOLOGIES INC 199.00 AP 00181519 4/3/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 315.55 AP 00181519 4/3/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 121.04 AP - 00181520 4/3/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 45.58 AP - 00181520 4/3/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 121.90 AP - 00181521 4/3/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 7,502.00 AP - 00181522 4/3/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 1,153.32 AP - 00181523 4/3/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,022.68 AP - 00181524 4/3/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,020.00 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 81.63 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 216.58 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 149.95 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 233.81 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 109.91 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 18.97 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 143.30 AP - 00181525 4/3/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 41.07 AP - 00181526 4/3/2002 BARKATT AMERICAN INC 3,000.00 AP - 00181527 4/3/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,008.00 AP - 00181528 4/3/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 495.48 AP - 00~81528 4/3/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE ]NC 410.57 AP - 00181528 4/3/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 10.78 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 04/09/,~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181529 4/3/2002 BOSE, RATHINDRA 213.80 AP - 00181530 4/3/2002 BOWERY, ROBERT 400.00 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.35 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.67 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 101.99 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.38 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 208.93 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 86.52 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP ~ 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 55.12 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP ~ 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.75 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 43.48 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.82 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.82 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 701.38 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 63.97 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS. 4.67 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 584.54 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 23.39 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 46.77 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 115.34 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 2,129.19 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 533.32 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 1,720.36 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.27 AP - 00~81533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 39.81 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 72.60 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 302.68 User: ahrmsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 35.51 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.91 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.64 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 17.41 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 12.25 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 267.04 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.01 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 147.53 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 27.11 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.55 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.96 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 83.63 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 94.60 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 8.99 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 7.73 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 119.46 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.87 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 48.47 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 17.45 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 26.18 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.96 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 17.41 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 361.93 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.10 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.26 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 45.16 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.05 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.55 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 28.22 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.65 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 60.59 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 144.57 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.88 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 35.72 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 10.41 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 30.72 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 80.92 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.22 AP 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 85.78 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00181533 4/3/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.67 AP - 00181534 4/3/2002 BUTLER JR, EMANUEL 250.00 AP - 00181534 4/3/2002 BUTLER JR, EMANUEL 250.00 AP - 00181535 4/3/2002 BYRD AND ASSOCIATES INC R M 2,000.00 AP - 00181535 4/3/2002 BYRD AND ASSOCIATES INC R M 4,000.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 04/09/2 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlrait Layout Time: 17:4' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181536 4/3/2002 CAL POLY 295.00 AP- 00181537 4/3/2002 CALAA 50.00 AP - 00181538 4/3/2002 CALSENSE 382.38 AP - 00181539 4/3/2002 CASTO 250.00 AP - 00181540 4/3/2002 CATRON, DALE B 56.14 AP - 00181541 4/3/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 140.29 AP - 00181541 4/3/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 520.17 AP - 00181542 4/3/2002 CENTEX HOMES 600.00 AP - 00181543 4/3/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS [NC 2,886.08 AP - 00181544 4/3/2002 CHARTER. MEDIA 288.00 AP - 00181545 4/3/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 79.05 AP - 00181545 4/3/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 205.38 AP - 00181545 4/3/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 146.60 AP - 00181546 4/3/2002 CLEAN FUEL CONNECTION INC 11,631.10 AP - 00181547 4/3/2002 CMTA 2002 CONFERENCE 305.00 AP - 00181548 4/3/2002 COFFMAN, JUDY 20.00 AP - 00181549 4/3/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 65.51 AP - 00181549 4/3/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 155.16 AP - 00181550 4/3/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP - 00181550 4/3/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP - 00181550 4/3/2002 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 10.00 AP - 00181551 4/3/2002 CORREIA, BOBBY 186.60 AP - 00181552 4/3/2002 CPRS DISTRICT XI 259.00 AP - 00181553 4/3/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,877.92 AP - 00181553 4/3/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 614.17 AP- 00181554 4/3/2002 DAPPER TIRE CO 2,376.88 AP - 00181555 4/3/2002 DE LA MOP. A, MARLO 70.00 AP - 00181556 4/3/2002 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 35.00 AP - 00181557 4/3/2002 DINOTO, JOSEPH 400.00 AP - 00181558 4/3/2002 DPDG FUND I LLC 100,000.00 AP - 00181559 4/3/2002 DPDG FUND III, LLC 1,800.00 AP - 00181560 4/3/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 275.84 AP - 00181560 4/3/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 232.74 AP - 00181560 4/3/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 306.01 AP 00181561 4/3/2002 ELITE TOWING 50.00 AP 00181562 4/3/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 747.41 AP 00181562 4/3/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 791.29 AP 00181562 4/3/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 603.00 AP 00181563 4/3/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 9,003.31 AP 00181564 4/3/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 2,754.89 AP 00181565 4/3/2002 ESCOBAR, SANTIAGO 70.00 AP 00181566 4/3/2002 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00 AP 00181566 4/3/2002 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 385.00 AP 00181567 4/3/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 340.69 AP 00181567 4/3/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 28.82 AP 00181567 4/3/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 29.72 AP 00181568 4/3/2002 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 511.81 AP 00181568 4/3/2002 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 28.00 AP 00181569 4/3/2002 EXCLUSIVELY VOLVO VOLKSWAGEN SUBAR/ 33.67 AP - 00181570 4/3/2002 FAIRFIELD DEV 1,800.00 AP - 00181571 4/3/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.77 AP - 00181572 4/3/2002 FELIPES TAQUERIA 128.65 AP - 00181573 4/3/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 247.17 AP - 00181573 4/3/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND [NC 17.24 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: t6 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CKAGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181573 4/3/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 371.35 AP - 00181574 4/3/2002 FERGUSON CONSTRUCTION 5,000.00 AP - 00181575 4/3/2002 FIELDSTONE COMMUNITIES [NC 1,200.00 AP - 00181576 4/3/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 341.00 AP - 00181577 4/3/2002 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS [NC 607.25 AP - 00181578 4/3/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 695.77 AP - 00181579 4/3/2002 FLIPSIDE CHURCH 200.00 AP - 00181580 4/3/2002 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 326.20 AP - 00181581 4/3/2002 FORECAST 600.00 AP - 00181582 4/3/2002 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 800.00 AP - 00181583 4/3/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 135.24 AP - 00181583 4/3/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 95.99 AP - 00181584 4/3/2002 GOAL SPORING GOODS [NC 841.37 AP - 00181585 4/3/2002 GRAINGER, WW 78.12 AP - 00181585 4/3/2002 GRAINGER, WW 565.13 AP - 00181585 4/3/2002 GRAINGER, WW 14.98 AP- 00181586 4/3/2002 GROLIER PUBLISH[NG CO INC 121.12 AP - 00181587 4/3/2002 GUARDIAN 2,895.00 AP - 00181588 4/3/2002 GWYNN, JOANN 58.40 AP- 00181589 4/3/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,624.66 AP - 00181590 4/3/2002 HAMMETT'S 12.38 AP - 00181591 4/3/2002 HAMOUDI, MUNTHER 100.00 AP- 00181592 4/3/2002 HAVEN BUILD1NG MATERIALS 7.42 AP - 00181593 4/3/2002 HOLIDAY INN VENTURA BEACH 462.00 AP - 00181594 4/3/2002 HOME BUYERS CONNECTION 5.63 AP - 00181595 4/3/2002 HORTON INC, D R 1,200.00 AP - 00181596 4/3/2002 HOSE MAN INC 23.89 AP - 00181597 4/3/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 80.93 AP - 00181598 4/3/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 61.74 AP - 00181598 4/3/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 256.46 AP - 00181598 4/3/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 79.79 AP - 00181599 4/3/2002 ID BURR 662.60 AP - 00181599 4/3/2002 ID BURR 88.62 AP - 00181599 4/3/2002 ID BURR 337.90 AP - 00181599 4/3/2002 ID BURR 60.00 AP - 00181599 4/3/2002 ID BURR 21.50 AP - 00181600 4/3/2002 IIMC 205.00 AP - 00181600 4/3/2002 IIMC 90.00 AP - 00181601 4/3/2002 [NDUSTR/AL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 52.00 AP - 00181602 4/3/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 206.07 AP - 00181603 4/3/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 174.55 AP - 00181604 4/3/2002 INTELLI TECH 5,831.43 AP - 00181604 4/3/2002 INTELLI TECH 1,196.03 AP - 00181605 4/3/2002 1NTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 150.00 AP - 00181606 4/3/2002 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 96.53 AP - 00181607 4/3/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 20,962.50 AP - 00181608 4/3/2002 JPI WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION 1,800.00 AP - 00181609 4/3/2002 K B HOMES 7,600.00 AP - 00181610 4/3/2002 KAMRANI, JOSEPH 400.00 AP - 00181611 4/3/2002 KAPCO 605.85 AP - 00181612 4/3/2002 KC PR[NTING & GRAPHICS [NC 533.36 AP - 00181613 4/3/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 396.52 AP - 00181613 4/3/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 73.22 AP - 00181614 4/3/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 841.90 User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 /7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181614 4/3/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 815.40 AP - 00181614 4/3/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 530.90 AP - 00181615 4/3/2002 LA INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF CHKIST 20.00 AP - 00181616 4/3/2002 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 500.00 AP - 00181616 4/3/2002 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 453.61 AP - 00181617 4/3/2002 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,500.00 AP- 00181618 4/3/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 435.14 AP - 00181619 4/3/2002 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 30.00 AP - 00181620 4/3/2002 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 174.00 AP - 00181621 4/3/2002 LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION 3,600.00 AP - 00181622 4/3/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 10,123.72 AP ~ 00181623 4/3/2002 LINEAR SYSTEMS 335.96 AP - 00181624 4/3/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 95.00 AP - 00181625 4/3/2002 LONGS DRUGS 15.71 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 31.74 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 48.06 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 24.03 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 12.01 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 39.68 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 9.53 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 86.59 AP - 00181626 4/3/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 25.11 AP - 00181627 4/3/2002 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 140.08 AP - 00181628 4/3/2002 M S A 175.00 AP - 00181629 4/3/2002 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 274.00 AP - 00181630 4/3/2002 MAURY, TERI 81.82 AP - 00181631 4/3/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 64.63 AP - 00181631 4/3/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 75.39 AP - 00181631 4/3/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 78.63 AP - 00181632 4/3/2002 MOULDINGS AND MILLWORK 20.04 AP - 00181632 4/3/2002 MOULDINGS AND MILLWORK 67.56 AP - 00181633 4/3/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 40.00 AP ~ 00181634 4/3/2002 NAHMMA 150.00 AP - 00181635 4/3/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 141.38 AP - 00181635 4/3/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 49.77 AP - 00181635 4/3/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 65.49 AP - 00181636 4/3/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP - 00181637 4/3/2002 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 129.00 AP - 00181638 4/3/2002 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP 195.00 AP - 00181639 4/3/2002 NATIONS RENT 2L55 AP - 00181640 4/3/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 971.38 AP - 00181641 4/3/2002 N1KPOUR, MOHAMMED 70.00 AP - 00181642 4/3/2002 NUNEZ, IRMA 200.00 AP - 00181643 4/3/2002 OCLC INC 89.01 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 145.54 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 26.15 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.84 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 15.55 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 28.15 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 202.59 AP 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 74.46 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 25.00 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 78.77 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 63.79 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP ~ 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 140.08 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 65.88 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 175.10 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.71 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 11.92 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.13 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 34.20 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 34.20 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 26.16 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.85 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 47.51 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 43.27 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.88 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 220.34 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.49 AP - 00181645 4/3/20'02 OFFICE DEPOT -10.64 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 683.86 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 10.64 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 36.71 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -7.24 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 1.05 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 137.66 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.68 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 253.04 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 106.81 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 44.77 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 27.62 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 55.21 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 21.23 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 49.86 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 146.49 AP ~ 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 177.09 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 284.17 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 74.67 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -36.65 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 212.31 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.14 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 34.19 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 1,286.82 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 336.94 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 6.92 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -26.65 AP - 00181645 4/3/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 32.21 AP - 00181646 4/3/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 86.19 AP - 00181646 4/3/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 0.35 AP - 00181646 4/3/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.52 AP - 00181646 4/3/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15.88 AP - 00181647 4/3/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 32.41 AP - 00181648 4/3/2002 PACIFIC COMMUNITIES 200.00 AP - 00181649 4/3/2002 PAIZ, RICARDO 76.00 AP - 00181650 4/3/2002 PARMA 100.00 AP - 00181651 4/3/2002 PARSAC 1,317.00 AP - 00181652 4/3/2002 PATTON SALES CORP 7.53 AP - 00181653 4/3/2002 PEP BOYS 53.79 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181654 4/3/2002 PEREZ, HECTOR 70.00 AP - 00181655 4/3/2002 PHONG, LORRAINE 400.00 AP 00181656 4/3/2002 PIPELINE PLUMBINGINC 1,000.00 AP 00181657 4/3/2002 PLANNING CENTER, THE 822.25 AP 00181658 4/3/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 57.00 AP 00181659 4/3/2002 POWELL, LEE 100.00 AP 00181660 4/3/2002 PREMIER HOMES 100.00 AP 00181661 4/3/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 1,198.80 AP 00181661 4/3/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 1,198.80 AP 00181662 4/3/2002 PROVANTAGE AUTO INC 2,500.00 AP 00181663 4/3/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP 00181664 4/3/2002 PYRO SPECTACULARSINC 9,084.00 AP 00181665 4/3/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 66.81 AP 00181666 4/3/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 127.00 AP 00181667 4/3/2002 RAINBOW BOOK COMPANY 1,751.59 AP 00181668 4/3/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 19.23 AP - 00181668 4/3/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 103.60 AP - 00181669 4/3/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 19.40 AP - 00181669 4/3/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 1.89 AP - 00181669 4/3/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 4.36 AP - 00181669 4/3/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 41.70 AP - 00181669 4/3/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 32.33 AP - 00181670 4/3/2002 REDINGER, TOM 227.00 AP - 00181671 4/3/2002 REGIS CONTRATORS L.P. 1,800.00 AP - 00181672 4/3/2002 RHOADS, ANNA 25.00 AP - 00181673 4/3/2002 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES 300.00 AP - 00181674 4/3/2002 RICHMOND AMEKICAN HOMES 118.13 AP - 00181675 4/3/2002 RIDGELINE ROOFING 9,325.00 AP - 00181676 4/3/2002 RIVAS, MIGUEL 73.00 AP - 00181677 4/3/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 54.31 AP - 00181677 4/3/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 87.28 AP - 00181677 4/3/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 173.91 AP - 00181677 4/3/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 40.41 AP - 00181677 4/3/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 87.08 AP - 00181678 4/3/2002 RMA GROUP 1,307.50 AP - 00181679 4/3/2002 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 1,440.82 AP- 00181679 4/3/2002 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 1,931.60 AP - 00181679 4/3/2002 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 4,595.39 AP - 00181680 4/3/2002 RP WAGES INC 1,400.00 AP - 00181681 4/3/2002 RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 400.00 AP - 00181682 4/3/2002 S AND S WORLDWIDE 882.75 AP - 00181683 4/3/2002 S B AND O INC 1,600.00 AP - 00181683 4/3/2002 S B AND O INC 20.00 AP - 00181684 4/3/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 203.85 AP - 00181684 4/3/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 407.70 AP - 00181685 4/3/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 184,150.00 AP - 00181686 4/3/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 24,272.46 AP - 00181687 4/3/2002 SANCHEZ, JOE 110.12 AP - 00181688 4/3/2002 SCIORTINO, NICOLAS 70.00 AP - 00181689 4/3/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 138.00 AP - 00181690 4/3/2002 SIERRA SPRINGS 113.66 AP - 00181691 4/3/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 178.49 AP - 00181691 4/3/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 75.00 AP - 00181691 4/3/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 5,705.12 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181691 4/3/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE 1NC 736.39 AP - 00181691 4/3/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE 1NC 75.00 AP - 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 144.27 AP - 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 45.65 AP - 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 67.76 AP - 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 471.93 AP 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 15.93 AP 00181692 4/3/2002 SMART AND FINAL 79.96 AP 00181693 4/3/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 1,873.53 AP 00181694 4/3/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 479.49 AP 00181694 4/3/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 29.92 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.29 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.94 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.97 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.80 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.54 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.00 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.09 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.03 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 21.21 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.61 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.93 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 228.68 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOR2qIA EDISON 12.10 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.32 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.50 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.91 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 12.78 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.91 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.75 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.37 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.46 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.14 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.80 Ap - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.19 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOR]qlA EDISON 86.90 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.21 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOR2qIA EDISON 12.23 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.34 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.07 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.71 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.34 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 174.59 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.50 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.36 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 822.40 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 184.46 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.20 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00181696 4/3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00181697 4/3/2002 SOUTHWEST SCHOOL AND OFFICE SUPPLY 40.95 AP 00181697 4/3/2002 SOUTHWEST SCHOOL AND OFFICE SUPPLY 167.61 AP 00181698 4/3/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1,350.00 AP 00181698 4/3/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2,336.00 AP 00181698 4/3/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1,376.00 AP 00181699 4/3/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98 AP 00181700 4/3/2002 STERL1NG TRUCK EQUIPMENT 562.17 AP 00181700 4/3/2002 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 22.68 AP 00181701 4/3/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,404.19 AP 00181702 4/3/2002 TANNER, O C 184.11 AP 00181702 4/3/2002 TANNER, OC 80.43 AP 00181703 4/3/2002 TARGET S?ECIALTY PRODUCTS 6,440.00 AP 00181703 4/3/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,405.92 AP 00181704 4/3/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 56.00 AP 00181704 4/3/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 400.00 AP 00181704 4/3/2002 TERMINIX INTER_NATIONAL 40.00 AP 00181704 4/3/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 162.00 AP 00181705 4/3/2002 TOMARK SPORTSINC 197.51 AP 00181705 4/3/2002 TOMARK SPORTSINC 93.20 AP 00181706 4/3/2002 TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES 200.00 AP 00181707 4/3/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCAILE REGIONAL 1,835.00 AP 00181707 4/3/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 635.00 AP 00181707 4/3/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 962.50 AP 00181707 4/3/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE REGIONAL 5,055.00 AP 00181708 4/3/2002 UCLA EXTENSION 240.00 AP 00181709 4/3/2002 UMODEN, BLESSING 200.00 AP 00181710 4/3/2002 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 287.50 AP 00181710 4/3/2002 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 258.75 AP 00181711 4/3/2002 UNIQUE CREATIONS 461.17 AP 00181712 4/3/2002 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 602.76 AP 00181712 4/3/2002 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 287.62 AP 00181713 4/3/2002 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE 14,780.00 AP 00181714 4/3/2002 VALENCIA, JOANN 168.00 AP 00181715 4/3/2002 VASQUEZ SR, RUBEN 54.00 AP 00181716 4/3/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 59.81 AP 00181717 4/3/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 926.06 AP - 00181718 4/3/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 206.76 AP- 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 511.79 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 243.06 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 04/09/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 17:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/27/2002 through 4/3/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 454.70 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 380.29 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 125.00 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 827.41 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 180.29 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 9.20 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 1,840.43 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 753.33 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 521.51 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 117.66 AP - 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 239.74 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 749.71 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 84.35 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 217.39 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 62.20 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 159.42 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 70.57 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 40.90 AP 00181719 4/3/2002 WAXIE 343.54 AP 00181720 4/3/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 2,300.00 AP 00181720 4/3/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 2,300.00 AP 00181721 4/3/2002 WHITE CAP 198.28 AP 00181721 4/3/2002 WHITE CAP 411.63 AP 00181722 4/3/2002 WILL, LINDA 40.00 AP 00181722 4/3/2002 WILL, LINDA 5.00 AP 00181723 4/3/2002 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 200.00 AP 00181724 4/3/2002 X PECT FIRST AID AND SAFETY 68.21 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 83.94 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 281.61 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 166.47 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 9,917.25 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP 00181725 4/3/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP 00181726 4/3/2002 YEE, LARRY 98.00 AP 00181727 4/3/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 70.00 Total for Check ID AP: 2,487,088.49 Total for Entity: 2,487,088.49 User: ahnnsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 04/09/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:4 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2002 Par Market Book % of Days to Y3'M Y'FM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 36,863,823.79 96,863,823.79 36,863,823.79 26.44 I 1 2.926 2.9~/ Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,515,225.43 1,515,000.00 1.09 180 57 1.950 1.977 F~deral Agency Issues - Coupon 101,100,000.00 101,782,512.92 101,041,181.25 72.47 1,649 1,185 5.473 5.550 Investments 139,478,823.79 140,161,562.14 139,420,005.04 100.00% 1,197 860 4.762 4.828 Cash Passbook/Checking 373,543.67 373,543.67 373,543.67 I 1 0.493 0.500 (not includsd in y~eld calculations) Total Cash and Investments 139,852,367.46 140,535,105.81 139,793,548.71 1,197 860 4.762 4.828 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 574,661.18 5,377,050.14 Average Daily Balance 141,095,694.11 135,256,092.36 Effective Rate of Return 4.80% 5.30% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govem the management of these funds. Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2002 Local Agency Investment Funds Certificates of Deposit/Neg, - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2002 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1~98 2,000,000.00 2,064,185.79 2,000,000.C~ 6A25 6.041 413 05/19/~003 31364KPT1 1065 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0~2000 3.000,000.{x} 3,030,937.50 3,000,000.00 7,875 7.767 1,162 06/06/2005 Po~olio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash March 31, 2002 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Market Value Rook Value Rata Moody's 360 Maturity Cash Accounts C0180 RANK OF AMERICA 373,543.67 373,543.67 373,543.67 0.500 0.493 1 Cash Subtotal and Average Balance 1,369~37.46 373,543.67 373,543.67 373,543.67 1 Total Cash end Investments 141,095,694.11 139,852,367.46 140,535,105.81 139,793,548.71 4.762 860 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 5 Investment Activity By Type March t, 2002 through March 31, 2002 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Sa~esfldaturifles Ending CUSIP Investment a Issuer Bahmce Rate Date or Oeposlta o~ Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.007 7,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 Subtotal 31,363,823.79 7,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 00,863,823.79 Savings/Miscellaneous ~ccounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 0.00 1,028,003.58 Subtotal 1,402,427.25 0.00 1,028,883.58 373,543.67 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Sank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 6~620 03~27/2CO2 0.00 2,000,000.00 312923MJ1 1082 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 5.700 03/21/2002 0.00 4,000,000.00 Subtotal 107,041,181.25 0.00 6,(X)O~000.00 101,041,181.25 Total 141,322,432.29 7,000,000.00 8,528,883.58 139,793,548,71 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended February 28, 2002 Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Payln;I Aqent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment Distdct No g3-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.50% $ 257,311.00 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.78 Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.50% 242,822.00 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.19 Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.50% 8~,889.00 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 585,022.97 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.50% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.04 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.50% 583,969.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.59 Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.50% 1,097,057.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.79 Redemption Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/111999 N/A* 1.50% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First Arnetican Treasury Obligation 3~2~2000 NIA* 1.50% 160.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.61 Residual Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.50% 217,017.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.73 $ 1,898,205.76 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,483,228.73 * Not~: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. 3/18/'2oo2 2:17 PM i:VinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ ~ G IN ~ E 1~ 1 N G D E PAI~TH E N T Slaff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer 7~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1316110-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Archibald Avenue and 19~h Street, Southwest Corner, Landscape Improvements, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project will install landscaping and irrigation in the parkway, and between the wall and th sidewalk, along the west side of Archibald Avenue from 19 Street to 100 feet south of Mignonette Street, and in the parkway along the south side of 19th Street from Archibald Avenue to 150 feet west of Klusman Avenue. Upon completion of the project, and acceptance by the City Council, the new landscaped area will be maintained out of General Fund. The project will be funded from Beautification funds,. Account No. 11103165650/1318110-0. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $246,100, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of $1,000 for construction survey, $1,000 for soils and material testing, and $300 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 23 and April 30, CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT lc)TM & Archibald Landscape Improvements-Notice Inviting Bids April 17, 2002 Page 2 2002, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully ~ ~ William J. O'Nq~il~/ City Engineer WJO:JAO:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution .Z/ 24TH ~T DNS~Jt 6TH 5T ~ RESOLUTION NO. O~~ 1]5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE 1NVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 2 similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can' show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained fi:om the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 4 work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses; in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class "C27" license (Landscaping Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Cotmter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS,, may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of Apr/l, 2002 Publish Dates: April 23 and April 30, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this th 17 dayofApril, 2002. William j. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA j. ADAMS, CITy CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of April, 2002. Executed this 17th day of April, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 23 and April 30, 2002 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DA'IF.: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engine~'iIx SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1153176 (MEASURE I) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Street and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planing, crack sealing, rubberized overlay, asphalt paving, installation of certain concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Account No. 11763035650/1153176. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation is $330,730. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 23, 2002 and April 30, 2002, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002. Re~.~trully submitted, Willi(~[F'J. O'Neil City Engineer LEH:Ieh Attachments ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STREET) .4 :ii ~ 2¢TH ST 6TH ST ,~ ..... 4,TH~ST,, PROd'RC'P SPPR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. OO~ ~ //& A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER S$~L~T" 1N SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT 'REHABILITATION, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STJ~i~i~, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the" ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STP,~F~" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 2 the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 4 work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class "C12" license (Earthwork and Paving Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the fight to reject any or all bids. q3 RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for" ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER S~'~T" may be directed to: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4066. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of April, 2002 Publish Dates: April 23 and April 30, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of April, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of April, 2002. Executed this 17th day of April, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 23 and April 30, 2002 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO'S. 11103165650/1319110-0 AND 11103165650/1320110-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and Hellman Avenue from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project will install Landscaping and irrigation in the parkway along the north side of Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and in the parkway along the east side of Hellman Avenue from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard. Upon completion of the project, and acceptance by the City Council, the new landscaped area will be maintained out of General Fund. The project will be funded from Beautification funds, Account No. 11103165650/1319110-0 and 11103165650/1320110-0. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $268,422, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Arrow-Hellman Landscape - Notice Inviting Bids April 17, 2002 Page 2 of $1,000 for construction survey, $1,000 for soils and material testing, and $300 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for Apdl 23 and April 30, 2002, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, Williarfl J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution VICINITY MAP ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION Almond Rd -- _~ Hillside Rd Banyan $ -' Route 30 ~) Iland Ay EXHIBIT "A" ~47 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEiVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cueamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE 1NVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GiVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVEbRJE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the ARROW ROUTE FROM RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 2 HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS". PREVAILiNG WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or qq RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 3 D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 4 to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class "C27" license (Landscaping Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FiVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 5 In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS" may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477- 2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of April, 2002 Publish Dates: April 23 and April 30, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of April, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of April, 2002. Executed this 17th day of April, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A ENGINEERING DIVISION $1aff Repor DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING FOR THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR PHASE lA OF CFD 01-01 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 16123035650/1442612-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Phase lA of CFD 01-01. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Community Facilities District 2001-01 was formed in August of 2001 to provide for the construction of the infrastructure relative to Tentative Tract Map 15947 and the regional mall site. The design package of plans, specifications and estimates for the first phase of construction are substantially complete. Phase lA construction will include the following: · Day Creek Boulevard from Base Line Road to Chumh Street · Church Street from Day Creek Boulevard to the existing terminus west of Rochester Avenue · South side of Base Line Road from Day Creek Channel to the west edge of the winery property · Main storm drain system from the outlet at Victoria Park Lane, south of Base Line Road, to the Day Creek Channel · Main distribution/collection system for water and sewer CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD 01-01 - Notice Inviting Bids April 17, 2002 Page 2 The remaining improvements, to be constructed as a part of CFD 01-01, Phase lB, will have construction documents ready to advertise later this year. ~ully submitted,. City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2001-01 EXHIBIT A 55' RESOLUTION NO. O 2. - ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEWE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 18, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for "PHASE 1A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PHASE lA.OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work ora similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to joumeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contr/butions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division o f Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty ofperj ury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Copies of the plans and specifications will be made available at the office of the City Engineer. They will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Dated this 17th day of April, 2002. Publish Dates: May 9 and May 23, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of April, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA ENGINEERING D E PART'tEN T Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 26408015602 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the4tCitY(h Council approve the plans and specifications for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase I to 350' S/o 8m) completion of the street widening and AC surface course paving; and Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase 2 (350' S/o 8th to N/o Railroad) storm drain, street widening, traffic signal & safety lighting, utility underground and railroad grade crossing improvements, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project will complete the Lower Hermosa Avenue project extending from 4t' Street to north of the Metrolink Railroad tracks north of 8m Street. it includes street widening, final paving, storm drain, undergrounding of existing overhead utilities, signals at 6th and 8t' Streets, upgrade of the railroad crossing, and installation of perimeter walls for the properties on the south side of 8t' Street. The project will be funded from Redevelopment Agency Funds, Account No. 26408015602. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. 5-7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Lower Hermosa - Notice Inviting Bids April 17, 2002 Page 2 The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $1,782,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of $10,000 for construction survey, $5,000 for soils and material testing, $406,000 for the railroad grade crossing work, $36,000 for Verizon to underground telephone facilities, $107,000 for Southern California Edison to underground electrical facilities and $1,000 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 23 and April 30, 2002, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitte,d, City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution PROJECT ~ O~TA~IO Gl~ LIMIT LOCATION ~~ CITY 0F RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ L0~R ~RMOSA A~NUE P~SE 1 & 2 S~EET, STORM D~N, UT~ U/G & R/R IMPR0~MENTS 4TH STREET T0 N/0 ~0~ T~CKS N/0 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. 0 ~-- tt/q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the folloxving words and figures, to xvit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GWEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. Apldl 17, 2002 Page 2 SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UT1LITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than filly dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 3 A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 4 The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure tO enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is tree and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE RESOLUTION NO. April 17, 2002 Page 5 DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 (4TM TO 350' S/O 8TM) COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING AND AC SURFACE COURSE PAVING; AND LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 2 (350' S/O 8TM TO N/O RAILROAD) STORM DRAIN, STREET WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING, UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS" may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of April, 2002 Publish Dates: April 23 and April 30, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of April, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor E N O I N E E R I N O D E PA R T M E N T Sti f Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor SUBJleCT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,000.00 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 1120305- 5650/1240-120-0, 1120305-5650/1241-120-0 & 1120305-5602 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Park Trash Enclosures and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Due to increased public usage of the parks, staff identified a need for expansion and addition of the trash enclosures in several existing parks. A budget request was made and the funds were allocated. This project will provide needed additional space for refuse and materials in Red Hill, Heritage, Milliken Parks and at the Epicenter maintenance building. Engineer's estimate for this project is $44,000.00. Res~lly submitted, City Engineer W JO:DC:sim RESOLUTION NO. (~) 2 '- / ~ O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, thc City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and arc hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thc City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON MAY 16, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for "PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES" in said City. Bids will bc publicly opened and read in the office of thc City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "BID FOR PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES". A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at thc Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at thc Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with thc provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than thc general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which thc public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages Resolution No. Page 3 for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are .making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Resolution No. Page 4 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. · The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "Class B" (General Building Contractor). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Resolution No. Page 5 The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is tree and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES may be directed to: Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4090 By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of April 2002. ADVERTISE ON: 04/23/02 04/30/02 THE CITY OF I~AN Cfi 0 C~ CAI'I 0 N GA SlaffReport DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJFL-T: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO CH2MHILL, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PROJECT STUDY REPORT AT ARROW ROUTE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, AND APPROPRIATE $12,000 FROM FUND BALANCE 1124, TO ACCOUNT NO. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve change order No. 2 to CH2MHILL, Inc. for the preparation of a project study report at Arrow Route and the 1-15 Freeway, and appropriate $12,000 from Fund Balance 1124, to account No. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On November 15, 2000, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $149,983 to CH2MHILL, Inc. for the preparation of a project study report to determine the configuration of a future freeway interchange needed at 6th Street and the I-15 Freeway. On September 19, 2001, the City Council approved Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $91,000. Change Order No. 1 was necessary in order to convert the study from a PSR to a PSR/PDS format. Also, the emphasis of the study shifted from a new freeway interchange located at 6t~ Street to Arrow Route. Change Order No. 2 is necessary because Caltrans staff requested the analysis of a new freeway interchange concept. This new concept will eliminate the southbound 1-15 Freeway off-ramp for Arrow Route. Southbound 1-15 Freeway traffic wishing to exit at Arrow Route will now exit at Foothill Boulevard, then travel south on a frontage road to Arrow Route. This alternative will eliminate the need for one bridge structure and will minimize the amount of right-of-way required. This alternative will cost over $4 million less than the next most preferred design alternative. This new altemative is shown on the attached Figure "A". CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO CH1MHILL, 1NC. April 17, 2001 Page 2 This project was begun in November of 2000. In February of 2002, Caltrans staff requested that a new design alternative be analyzed. This request came after the fmal report had been submitted for signature. In the opinion of City staff, a change order in this instance is justified. Respectfully Submitted-, Wi~i~am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAG:dlw Attachment 7/ T H E C I T Y 0 F l~AN CH 0 CU CAH 0 N C.A S Repo DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND MULBERRY STREET, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, approve accepting control and maintenance over Highland Avenue, between East Avenue and Mulberry Street, to be relinquished by the State of California. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Anticipating construction and/or reconstruction of streets within the City by Caltrans, the City and Caltrans entered into an agreement on March 4, 1998, whereby the City agreed to accept title to these frontage roads upon relinquishment thereof to the City by Caltrans, provided the roads were constructed according to approved plans. During construction of the Route 30/210 freeway interchange with 1-15, portions of Highland Avenue between East Avenue and 1-15 were taken by the freeway ramps leaving Highland Avenue from East Avenue to Mulberry Street. During construction of this reach of the freeway, Ryland Homes contributed in-lieu funds for the improvement of Highland Avenue, and Caltrans is contributing funds for landscaping of the north parkway of Highland Avenue. In order to bring Highland Avenue up to City standards other improvements such as widening and curb and gutter on t~e north side and signalization of the intersection of Highland Avenue and East Avenue are required. CiTY COUNCIL staff REPORT RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHLAND April 17, 2002 Page 2 Caltrans has agreed to relinquish this portion of Highland Avenue to the City if we accept control and maintenance. Caltrans has recently paved Highland Avenue, except where Etiwanda channel crosses the read. This area will be improved with the City's construction plan utilizing developer in-lieu funds. To expedite this relinquishment, it is recommended the 90-day notice be waived since staff feels the road is in a satisfactory condition, considering developer in-lieu funds and Caltrans' landscaping commitment. Respectfully submitted, William J O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MO:sc Attachment HIGHLAND VICTORIA 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 I 1.2 Miles , I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP HIGHLAND AVENUE EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET _75' RESOLUTION NO. ~)~ - ! 2- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ACCEPTING CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND MULBERRY STREET, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, by Freeway Way Agreement No. 98-010, dated March 4, 1998, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CITY) and the State of California, Department of Transportation (STATE), and by Resolution No. 98-039, dated March 4, 1998, the City agreed to accept title to frontage roads and reconstructed City streets upon relinquishment thereof to said City by the State of California; and WHEREAS, STATE desires to relinquish Highland Avenue between East Avenue and Mulberry Street to CITY; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to accept control and maintenance of said street; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to waive its 90-day notice requirement and agrees to accept title to said roads upon relinquishment thereof to said City by the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approve by resolution acceptance of control and maintenance over portions of Highland Avenue, between East Avenue and Mulberry Street, to be relinquished by STATE and accept title to those portions being relinquished as identified on the attached map. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign said Resolution and direct the City Clerk to attest the same. T H E C I ~ Y 0 F Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O2qeil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer b-IJIIIEC~: APPROVAL OF A REIMBURSEMENT TO DPDG FUND I, LLC FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WILSON AVENUE CROSSING OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL FOR TRACT 13851 IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 88-208 AND APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $522,273.93 FROM FUND 22-"TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT" RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $522,273.93 ~om F. und 2.2.- "Transportation Development"for a reimbursement to DPDG Fund I, LLC in conJunCtion with the development of Tract 13851. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval, Tract 13851 was required to construct Wilson Avenue crossing of Deer Creek Channel and the design of the crossing structure shall provide, for separati%n of vehicular and Community Trail traffic. The construction cost is eligible for rmmburse.ment trom the Transportation Development Fee fund (formally the Systems Fee. fu~, ~d)., .,A. r.e.s_o.!.ut~on to that effect was approved by the City Council on April 4, 1990 (copy attachea ~xmmt "U").. The work has been completed by the Developer, DPDG Fund I, LLC and accepted by the City. Also, the Developer has submitted itemized cost information, which has been reviewed and approved by City Staff. The total cost of the facility was $626,586.98. The Developer has received a credit against building permits of $104,313.05 leaving $522,273.93 left to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Development Fund. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Wilham J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments 77 RESOLUTION NO. OZ-' [Z 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROViNG A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WILSON AVENUE CROSSiNG OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 13851 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by DPDG Fund I, LLC, the Developer, for construction of Wilson Avenue crossing of Deer Creek Channel, in conjunction with the development of Tract 13851 located north of Wilson Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel; and WHEREAS, the Developer, at the Developer's expense, has completed the construction of Wilson Avenue crossing of Deer Creek Channel. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto. N CITY OF ITEM: ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGI1N'~.RRING DIVISION EXPrmlT:_.~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC~,~ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT OF TRACT NO. 138§1 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13851, consisting of 6I lots, submitted by Pacific International Development, Incorporated, Subdivider, located north of Wilson Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamenga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map-Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement Supplement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cuCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement Supplement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Agreement Supplement is accepted as being an addendum to the previously approved and executed agreement, dated January 3, 1990, subject to approval of said Supplement as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the Systems Development Fee for the project site shall be credited to the cost of the Wilson Avenue Crossing Structure Facility of Deer Creek Channel and the Developer ~hall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of said fee and that Systems Development Fees be used for said eligible reimbursements; and that said fee credit and eligible reimbursement both be and the same are approved, subject to approval as to procedure, form and content thereof by the City Attorney. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. 90-'14e Page 2 ATTE ST: D~bra J. Ad~(~s, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanlonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of April, 1990. Executed this 5th day of April, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. D~bra J, Ada~, City Clerk DPDG Fund 1, LLC 10621 Civic Center Drive, 2~d Floor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 481-1150 BRIDGE REIMBURSEMENT TRACT 13851 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Original Contract 561,191.00 Change Orders 13,256.50 Schedule A 574,447.50 574,447.50 Civil Engineer and Other Consultants 52,139.48 SchedUle B 52,139.48 52,139.48 626,586.98 Less: Transportation Fees (1) ($1,710.05 x 61 homes) (104,3t3.05) REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTED $ 522,273.93 (1) See attached letter dated March 24, 1999 T H E C I T Y 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAHONCA SmffReport DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: ,APPROVAl_ OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR A POTENTIAL WALKING TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND GRANT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that authorizes staff to submit the grant application for funds for a potential walking trail/open space project from the State of Califomia Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant Program. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: The City is interested in applying for a $300,000 grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program (LWCF) for a walking trail/open space development project that would be located in Central Park. The project would provide an outdoor recreational amenity that would complement other natural and historical elements featured in the park, as well as, any construction of future facilities. The walking trail/open space project is consistent with both the recreational element of the City's General Plan and the master plan for Central Park. The Land and Water Conservation Fund Program provides matching grants for acquisition and development of facilities that provide for or support outdoor recreation. The program, which is administered nationally by the National Park Service, became effective in January 1965, was initially authorized for a 25-year period, and has been extended for another 25 years to January 2015. Under the provisions of the California Outdoor Recreation Resources Plan Act of 1967, the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT WALKING TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION April 17, 2002 Page 2 State Liaison Officer, who is the Director of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, administers the expenditure of funds allocated to California. Funds for the program are derived from federal recreation fees, sales of federal surplus real property, the federal motorboat fuels tax and the Outer Continental Shelf mineral receipts. The State's allocation for this year is expected to be approximately $13 million. Of that amount, about $8 million will be awarded on a competitive basis to local jurisdictions. The local agencies' share of the funds is divided on the basis of population between northern California (40%) and southern California (60%). Projects are ranked using the priority rating system found in the Open Project Selection Process, and funded starting with the highest ranked projects, until the available funds are exhausted. Re~spe~ully submitted, Williadn J. O'Neil City Engineer P. ESOLtrrIO NO. 02 -/2 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR A POTENTIAL WALKING TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized the establishment of a Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant-In-Aid Program, providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for administration of the program in the state, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing application by the local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications and the availability of local matching funds prior to submission of said applications to the state; and WI-IEREAS, the proposed Walking Trail/Open Space Project is consistent with the Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Resources Plan: California Outdoor Recreation Plan - 1994; and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY: 1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance; and 2. Certifies that said agency has matching funds from the following source(s): and can finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will be reimbursed; and 3. Certifies that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent of the city to conduct all negotiations and execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, billing statements, and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Approved and Adopted on the 17th day of April, 2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk TH E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROMm. Eawrence I. T~mple, AdminiStrative S~rvices Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Pumhasing Manager DATE: April 17, 2002 I~J~IECI~. .~UTHORIZATION FOR THE FuRCHASE OF' COMPUTER REPLACEMENT ROLL-OUT ITEMS UNDER THE ANNUAL DOWNSTREA1VIING PROGRAM AS APPROVED IN THE BUDGET~ TO INCLUDE: THIRTEEN (13) HEWLETT PACKARD 4100DTN LASER,lET PRINTERS WITH ENVELOPE FEEDERS AND ON-SITE' ~UFFORT PACKS AND I~'II~"I'EEN-(I5) OIVINIBOOK~ XE3 NOTEBOOKS WITH ON-SITE SUPPORT PACKS FROM MICROAGE COMPUTERMART~ OF DIAMOND BARt IN THE AMOUNT OF $66~631.52~ FUNDED FROM FUND 1714-001-5605 AND TRANSFER APPROPRIATION OF ~;10~942.01 FROM FUND 1714-001-5605 TO 1714-001-5300 FOR SUPPORT PACK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the City Council authorize the pumhase of computer replacement roll- out items under the annual downstreaming program, as approved in the budget. These pumhases include: Thirteen (13) Hewlett Packard 4100DTN Laser Jet Pdnters with envelope feeders and on-site support packs and fifteen (15) Omnibook XE3 Notebooks with on-site support packs from MicreAge Computermart, of Diamond Bar, in the amount of $66,631.52, funded from fund 1714-001-5605 and transfer apprepdation of $10,942.01 from fund 1714- 001-5605 to 1714-001-5300 for support pack maintenance agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of these computer replacement roll-out items under the annual downstreaming program as identified in the fiscal year 2001Y2002 budget document under account 1714-001-5605, as an equipment replacement purchase. The Information Systems Division provided specifications to Purchasing for the Hewlett Packard products and support packs. Purchasing prepared a Request for Bid and mailed it to thirteen (13) vendors. In addition, twenty-one vendors downloaded the Request for Bid from the'City's website, making a total of thirty-four (34) responses. After analysis of the bids by the Information Systems Manager, and Pumhasing Staff, it has been determined that MicroAge Computermart, of Diamond Bar is the lowest, most responsive and responsible vendor that meets the specifications required by the Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A F,,NGINEEDING DE PADT~II~NT Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY': Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES FOR DRCDRO0-76, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 6TM STREET WEST OF CLEVELAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL INVESTORS, URA-018 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the north side of 6t~ Street west of Cleveland Avenue, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS: The Developer, Riverside Commercial Investors, has completed the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities fronting his project, DRCDR00-76, as required by the project conditions of approval. He is now requesting a reimbursement agreement to recover a pro rata share of the undergrounding costs from the adjacent properties directly benefiting from the undergrounding, which is consistent with City policy. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the undergrounding cost data supplied by the Developer and the distribution of the costs to the benefit parcels as contained in the reimbursement agreement. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. One of the benefit parcels, 210-082-42, as shown in the Reimbursement Agreement exhibits, is across the street from the Developer. This benefit parcel has previously CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-76 April 17, 2002 Page 2 contributed fees (DRCDR00-70) to the City in-lieu of undergrounding the overhead utilities specifically a portion performed by this Developer. A portion of this pre-paid fee will now reimburse the Developer, thereby deferring much of URA-018 immediately. The properties affected by the agreement were notified by mail 10 days prior to tonight's Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MB:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. (~2--/2~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 6TM STREET WEST OF CLEVELAND AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Riverside Commercial Investors, as developer for DRCDR00-76, for the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities on the north side of 6th Street west of Cleveland Avenue (URA-018); and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said utility undergrounding;and WHEREAS, the owner of the adjoining properties will share in the expense of the utility undergrounding as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAlL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES FOR Project: DRCDR00-76 File: URA-018 This Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,20 , by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Riverside Commercial Investors (hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER") for the undergreunding of the overhead utility lines associated with the project of DEVELOPER. A. Recitals. (i) DEVELOPER has heretofore processed certain approvals and/or entitlements for the development and construction of a project within the CITY. (ii) As a material condition of said approval of the project of DEVELOPER, the DEVELOPER was required to underground existing overhead utilities associated with DEVELOPER's project. Said condition and map of undergrounding indicating affected parcels is set forth in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" respectively, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. (iii) The DEVELOPER has at DEVELOPER'S expense, furnished all labor, equipment, and materials, and has paid all costs incident to the undergrounding of utilities as described in Exhibit "A". (iv) The DEVELOPER has submitted to the City Engineer verification of completion and approval of utility undergrounding from the appropriate public utilities. (v) Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 8%96, when a specific condition of development approval requires the undergrounding Of existing overhead utility lines and the removal of related supporting poles, if any, adjacent to and within the limits of the development, it is the policy of CITY to, where feasible, attempt to collect and reimburse fees for undergmunding from those adjacent parcels benefitting directly from such undergrounding activity at the time said adjacent parcels themselves are subdivided or developed. (vi) The parcel or parcels adjacent to the project of DEVELOPER which are directly benefitted by the utility undergrounding activity of DEVELOPER are shown on Exhibit "C" and set forth in a list attached hereto as Exhibit "D" both incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter, said parcel or parcels are referred to as the "Benefit Parcel(s)"). (vii) The Benefit Parcel(s) adjacent to the project of the Developer, which have contributed fees to the City in the past in lieu of undergrounding of overhead utilities specifically for the undergrounding work performed by the Developer, and/or Benefit Parcel(s) categorically exempt from undergrounding requirements as stipulated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, are set forth in a description attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter, said parcel or parcels are referred to as the "Exempt Parcel(s)"). (viii) CITY is willing, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, to collect a fee or charge from the Benefit Pareel(s) to reimburse DEVELOPER for utility undergrounding as provided in this Agreement. The funds to be reimbursed to the Developer by each "Benefit Parcel" are summarized in Exhibit "F", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. (ix) Ten (10) days prior to the approval and execution of this Agreement, CITY has provided notice, to those persons, firms, corporations or associations owning an interest in the Benefit Parcel(s), of the CITY's intent to enter into ihis Agreement. B. . Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and DEVELOPER as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Agreement. 2. CITY agrees to reimburse DEVELOPER any utility undergrounding fees, as provided in this Agreement, collected from any person, firm, corporation or association, their successors or assigns, owning -2- an interest in the Benefit Parcel(s) (Exhibit "C"). 3. DEVELOPER is eligible for reimbursement of fees and charges from the Benefit Parcel(s) for the undergrounding activities as follows: a. When the condition of undergrounding (Exhibit 'A") requires utility undergroanding of lines only on the DEVELOPER's project side of the street, the DEVELOPER is eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of such utility undergrotmding from the Benefit Parcel(s) on the opposite side of the street from the Developer's project boundary and reimbursement of the full cost of required tmdergrounding beyond the Developer's project boundary (one-half to be collected fi.om the Benefit Parcel(s) on each side of the street) upon the subdivision or development (other than a single family residence) of the Benefit Parcel(s). b. When the Condition of undergrounding requires DEVELOPER to underground utilities on both sides of the street, the DEVELOPER is eligible for reimbursement in a total equivalent to one-half the total undergrounding on both sides of the street. 4. DEVELOPER is entitled to such eligible reimbursement of fees or charges collected following the date of this Agreement from the Benefit Parcel(s) in an amount based on and/or equal to the lesser of the two total amounts as follows: a. The actual cost incurred to complete the utility undergrounding (together with interest' from the date of this Agreement at the rate often percent (10%) per annam, simple interesO. DEVELOPER shall provide the City Engineer a cost breakdown and accounting of all such utility undergrounding costs in a form satisfactory to the City Engineer. b. The amount of the CITY approved in-lieu fee for utility undergrounding (as applied to DEVELOPER's eligible undergrounding activity) in effect at the time of collection from the Benefit Parcel(s). 5. Developer is entitled to such eligible reimbursement of fees or charges collected by the City from the Exempt Parcel(s) or Benefit Parcel(s) prior to the date of this Agreement in an amount based on and/or equal to the lesser of the two total amounts as follows: a. The actual cost incurred to complete the utility undergrounding. b. The undergrounding in-lieu fee collected by the City. 6. The reimbursement of the fees and charges as set forth in this Agreement shall be paid to DEVELOPER from time to time as fees are collected from the Benefit Parcel(s) as such parcel(s) are subdivided or developed (other than a single family residence). Reimbursement fees or charges have been pro-rated between the Benefit Parcel(s) based on the linear foot frontage of such Parcel facing DEVELOPER's project and shall be collected in such pro-rated amount as each such Parcel is subdivided or developed. However, all right of reimbursement shall cease twenty (20) years after the date of this Agreement, whether or not the reimbursement amount provided in this Agreement has been delivered or partially delivered to DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER may assign any and all rights to reimbursement under this Agreement by providing a written, verified, notice to the CITY. Such assignment shall only be effective with respect to a reimbursement fee collected more than thirty (30) days following the receipt of such written, verified notice of one or more persons, finns, corporations or associations holding the rights to the reimbursement provided in this Agreement, the CITY may deliver any reimbursement to any one such persons, etc., and such reimbursement shall be deemed received by all. 8. Any notice or reimbursement funds collected pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided to DEVELOPER at the address as follows: Riverside Commercial Investors The Loring Building 3685 Main Street, Suite 220 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 788-6100 9. If, within sixty (60) days after collection of such reimbursement fees or costs, the CITY has not been able to contact DEVELOPER at the address provided in paragraph 9, above, or has not been notified by DEVELOPER or their assignees of a new address to deliver such funds, such right to reimbursement, in whole, or in part, shall be deemed waived, and any funds so collected shall be put into an -4- account of CITY for the development of public improvements of C1TY. 10. If the fee or charge established by this Agreement is hereinafter declared invalid or unenforceable by preemptive legislation or a court of competent jurisdiction, all of DEVELOPER's rights to reimbursement shall cease and terminate. Nothing herein shall be construed as a warranty by CITY that it will be able, legally or otherwise, to collect on account of DEVELOPER the reimbursement fees as provided herein, nor shall this Agreement establish an obligation upon CITY to expend funds in litigation with respect to the collection of such fees. CITY's only obligation in this Agreement is the attempt to collect such fees and charges, without litigation, and to make reimbursement to DEVELOPER out of those fees and charges actually collected. 11. This Agreement contains the entire terms and conditions between CITY and DEVELOPER with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement cannot be modified except by an Agreement in writing, approved by CITY and DEVELOPER. 12. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER Sign Date Type Name Title -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: Mayor Date ATTEST: APPROVED Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Attorney -6- PER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-27, DATED MARCH 14,2001, ENGINEERING SPECIAL CONDITIONS, NO. ONE (1) READS AS FOLLOWS: The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole off site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The development across the street, fronting 6t~ Street along the south side, has paid a fee to the City for the undergrounding of these overhead utilities. This developer (Development Review 00-76) may request reimbursement for one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding along his project frontage. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Item: URA-018, DRCDR00-76 Title: Map of Undergrounding Exhibit: "A" -7- q7 TTEM: UR,K- 18) N/5 (oTM w~ CLEVELAND TITLE: I"AAP oF !.~NOERF~P,O~,~DIN(~ <~ ~09- '~'//- 17 DRCDR O0-Tb R09-~II-,~ 8 ~.10- 08t- SO BENEFIT PARCEL ROSTER APN: 209-411-17 Proper~y Address: 9229, 9239, 9269 and 9269 Unit #2 6th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Owner: Voit Cal Partners I & II, LLC Mailing Address: 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1150 Irvine, CA 92614 Frontage: 128.35 Feet Reimbursement Estimate: 128.35 x $213.00 x 0.5 = $13,669.27 Reimbursement Actual: 128.35 x $211.23 x 0.5 = $13,555.69 APN: 209-411-28 Property Address: 10860 6th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Owner: Wohl / Empire Lakes, LLC Mailing Address: 2402 Michelson Drive, Suite 170 Irvine, CA 92612 Frontage: 101.67 Feet Reimbursement Estimate: 101.67 x $213.00 x 0.5 = $10,827.86 Reimbursement Actual: 101.67 x $211.23 x 0.5 = $10,737.88 ITEM: URA-18 TITLE: LIST OF BENEFIT PARCELS EXHIBIT: "D" EXEMPT PARCEL ROSTER APN: 210-082-42 Property Address: 10901 W. 6th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Owner: Fowler - Flanagan Partners, LLC Mailing Address: F & F Simon Rancho Tech, LLC 23201 Lake Center Drive, Suite 201 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Alternate Mailing Address: F & F Simon Rancho Tech, LLC 80 Sir Frances Drake Blvd., Suite 3B Larkspur, CA 94939 Frontage: 638 Feet Reimbursement Estimate: 638 x $213.00 x 0.5 = $67,947.00 Reimbursement Actual: 638 x $211.23 x 0.5 = $67,382.37 ITEM: URA-018 TITLE: LIST OF EXEMPT PARCELS EXHIBIT: "E" PROJECT: DRCDR00-76 AFFECTED UTILITIES: Electrical, Telecommunications DATE OF AGREEMENT: EXPIRATION DATE OF AGREEMENT: EXHIBIT "F" Reimbursement Schedule Based on Actual Costs I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Reimbursement Reimbursement Cost @ Time of Reimbursement Based on City Lesser of Assessor's Reimbursement Cost Including Approved In- Columns Date Date Parcel No. Agreement Interest * Lieu of Fee * III or IV Received ** Reimbursed Z~-ftl-2~ $10:737. 8~ ~/~gzV. g~ * See Section B.5.a and B.5.b of the Reimbursement Agreement. **All rights of reimbursement shall cease Twenty Years m°rer the date of this agreement Exhibit "F" C:\My Proj ects\drO0-76Reimb.doc distugco.wpd Distribution of Undergroundin~ Cost Total Cost of undergrounding b~.vetzr, c~ P,,~,~oectn, z',wt.r~-oas-: 4 / ~ 7CD'~, ~'¥ [.~p~7'F~F~. ~7.~_~ ~I~P.t:M 1, 9..002.. Total linear R. of undergrounding Cost per ~ear foot of Cost per linear foot of fxontage to undergrounding(F~o,v r,~'-~ -' q'o?.9~ Contributing Undergrounding Estimate * Parcel ^.~.~. ,2~9-~t][''.~ [o1.~? 0o~.6'1,~,2~.~2. =.~ ~o~'~?,~ A.P.N. ^.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N A.P.N. ^.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N. ^.P.N. A.P.N. * The actual amount of the reimbursement will be detennined at the time of payment as stipulated in Sections B.5.a and B.5.b of the Reimbursement Agreement. REV 3-19-91 lo3 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A DATE: Apd117, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00275, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELMS AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND 9TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY ALBERT AND BETTY GUTIERREZ, TRUSTEE OF THE GUTIERREZ FAMILY TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 26, 1997 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2001-00275, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2001-00275, located on the east side of Helms Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street, in the Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 24, 2001. This project is for the development of a 29,300 square foot industrial building on 2.06 acres of land. The Developer, Albert and Betty Gutierrez, Trustee of the Gutierrez Family Trust, dated February 26, 1997, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $20,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $10,000.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00275 April 17, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MNB:sc Attachments N.T.S -- PROJ£C T L OCA T/O/V FO0 THIL L BL VD At~t~OW ROUTE 9 TH 76 STR~C~cT METROLINK 6 TH STREET City of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTIONNO. 02- 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2001-00275 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Albert and Betty Gutierrez, Trustee of the Gutierrez Family Trust, dated February 26, 1997, as developer, for the improvement of public fight-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Helms Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRC2001-00275; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. (~2-/2~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00275 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvemems"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consem and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00275 Apfil17,2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment aga'mst the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in mounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory fi.om the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: ALBERT AND BETTY GUTIERREZ, TRUSTEE OF THE GUTIERREZ FAMILY TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 26, 1997 The legal description of the Property is: The South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township I South, Range 7 West, San Bemardino Base and Meridian, being a portion of the Southeast quarter, said Section 10 marked "SACHAE", as shown on map of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown by Map on file in Book 4, Page(s) 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, California. Excepting therefrom the Westerly 732.00 feet, the Easterly 175.00 feet, the Northerly 213.64 feet and the Southerly 238.72 feet of said South half. The West line of said parcel coincides with the East right of way line of Helms Avenue, as set forth in the instrument recorded July 19, 1967 in Book 6858, Page 482 of Official Records. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. ^-i /10 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 AR R OW F~O'J. TF' I..-E. GF__.M D ~ o .~ NEW 5800 L.L[M~N HPSV .< 5TRF..-F.T LIG HI ~ .-o DRCZOOI-OOZ7'$ 9~" 5TREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~Or~T~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. Thc various landscape sites that arc maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within thc Metrolink Station and 22.g7 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including thc stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on artcri,al streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or conunercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thcreoQ on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: DRC2001-00275 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # I ............... SLD # 6 1 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 3B ......... * · Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B N/A 2.06 4.12 2.06 2.06 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and ll~e llnil Tyne []nits I lnit~ Faetnr ~' Jnil~; lJnit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2063.86 1.0 2063.86 $352.80 $728,129.81 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00275) is: 2.06 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $726.77 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and llse I Jnit Tvne 1 Initn l lnits Factor [ lnitn llnit Revemm Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00275) is: 2.06 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $73.21 Annual Assessment c-i //q/ Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and ll~e [lnit Tyne I/nits I lnit~ Faetnr llnit~ [Init Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00275) is: 2.06 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $105.88 Annual Assessment //5 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ NCI[~I~I~I~ G Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O2'qeil, City Engineer BY: James T. Hams, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,669.50 ($24,245.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, NEW WEST SIGNAL, FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650 AND APPROPRIATE $27,000.00 FROM FUND 124, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $26,669.50 ($24,245.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, New West Signal, for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development funds, Account No. ! 1243035650 and appropriate $27,000.00 from Fund 124, Transportation Systems Development fund balance to Account No. 11243035650. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 2, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $30,000.00. Staff has reviewed ali bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Re spect ful~v~fl~nitt e d, City Engini~''~ WJO:JTH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 2, 2002 MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET ENGINEERS COST Broadband Powering Pete & Sons AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE ESTIMATE New West Signal Services, Inc. Construction UNIT[ BID UNITI UNIT[ UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at Banyan Street $30~000.00 1. 1 LS and FredericksburgAvenue $30~000.00 $24~245.00 $24?245.00 $26~503.00 $26,503.00 $28~765.00 $28~765.00 I I TOTAL I $30~000.011 $24~245.011 I $26~$03.00 $28~765.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 2, 2002 MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE NAME NAME NAME NAME UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT 1~10 QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at Banyan Slxeet 1. I LS and Fredericksburg Avenue I TOTAL '"'- Page 1 Figure "A" Traffic Signal Modification Project R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ ~CINE EE!ING DIIDAI~T~ENT SlaffReport , DATE: April 17, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. Oqqeil, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~: ACCEPT BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,110.70 ($33,737.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, NEW WEST SIGNAL, FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1281124-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $12,200.00 FROM FUND 124, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1281124-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $37,110.70 ($33,737.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal, for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development funds, Account No. 11243035650/1281124-0 and appropriate an additional $12,200.00 from Fund 124, Transportation Systems Development fund balance to Account No. 11243035650/1281124-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 2, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $20,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. The two lowest bids were within $10,000.00 of each other and are therefore considered representative of the current costs to construct traffic signal modifications at the subject intersections. A third bid was considered to be too high indicating a lack of knowledge of the intersections and lack of experience in working in Rancho Cucamonga. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. City Engineer WJO:JTH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 2, 2002 MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN ENGINEERS COST Broadband Powering Pete & Sons STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS ESTIMATE New West Signal Services Inc. Construction UNIT BID UNIT UNIT I UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COSTI AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at Carnelian 1. 1 LS Street andLa Vine/La Grande Streets $20~000.00 $20~000.00 $33~737.00 $33~737.00 $43,960.00 $43,960.00 $61~234.00 $61:234.0C I I TOTAL I $20?000.00 I $33,73"/.00 I $43?960.00 $61~234.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 2, 2002 MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARNELIAN CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS NAME NAME NAME NAME UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at Carnelian 1. 1 LS Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets I I I I ~ I TOTA~ I I ~ Page 1 Figure "A" Carnelian, LaVine and LaGrande Traffic Signal Project T H E C I T Y 0 F I~ANCll 0 ClJ CAIq 0 N C,A DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE CITY TO ACQUIRE AN OFF-SITE EASEMENT, SECURITY AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15665, LOCATED NORTH OF 6TM STREET, EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL, SUBMITTED BY PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving an Acquisition Agreement, Security and Deposit, and also authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS The Developer is required to install extension of Santa Anita Avenue, located north of 6th Street with this tentative parcel map. Said extension is composed of a 66-foot wide public street easement from 6th Street to the northerly boundary of north edge of adjacent SCE property and owned by neither the Developer nor the City. The Developer has made a good faith effort to acquire an easement for installation of the improvements, but has been unable to do so. The City is authorized by State law to acquire by eminent domain that property necessary for streets, highways and related purposes. The Developer has signed the agreement and submitted the appropriate deposit and security for acquisition. This agreement allocates costs and responsibilities towards obtaining said properties. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachment /2Z FOOTHILL ARROW ROUTE ~OC~4TIO~' ~-rH ~4TH SlP6ET N CITY OF ~: ~ ~T~, ~-/~/$~'~---,~-- RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'rrr[.~.: ~~ ENGIN~.k~.ING DIVISION ~XI4TRIT: ~ /2~ RESOLUTION NO. ~) 2 - / 2_ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15665 FROM PARAGON SANTA ANITA LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the Developer, Paragon Santa Anita LLC, has been conditioned to acquire rights-of-way for Santa Anita Avenue, north of 6th Street, across the SCE and MWD corridors, prior to final map approval; and WHEREAS, for the Developer to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to recording of the final map of said development said Developer has offered the Acquisition Agreement, submitted herewith, for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient security and deposit. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. That said Acquisition Agreement be and the same hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Acquisition Agreement on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest hereto; and 2. That said Acquisition Agreement is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. /z¢ ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DIVISION Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIAL BONDS AND ACCEPT REPLACEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIAL BONDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND-2, SUBMI'I-rED BY RC HOMES, LLC, LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF MILLER AVENUE, BETVVEEN EAST AND ETIWANDA AVENUES RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for improvements for Tracts 15711-1 and -2, and accept replacement Faithful Performance Bond and Material and Labor Bonds for Tracts 15711~1 and -2. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tracts 15711-1 and -2, located north and south of Miller Avenue, between East and Etiwanda Avenues, the applicant is required to required to complete street improvements. The applicant is replacing the bonds currently accepted by City Council and is requesting that the City Council accept replacement bonds. It is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and Labor and Material Bonds and accept the new Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds. Developer: Pacific Communities RC Homes, LLC 1000 Dove Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bonds Labor and Material Bonds Tract 15711-1 SD00084195 $2,945,000.00 $1,472,500.00 Tract 15711-2 SD00084196 $2,156,000.00 $1,078,000.00 Tract15711-1 &-2 SD00084197 $ 620,500.00 $ 310,250.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Tracts 15711-1 and-2 April 17, 2002 Page 2 Accept: Faithful Performance Bonds Labor and Material Bonds Tract 15711-1 BE2616305 $1,300,000.00 $1,472,500.00 Tract 15711-2 BE2616306 $1,700,000.00 $1,078,000.00 Tract15711-1 &-2 BE2616307 $ 620,500.00 $ 310,250.00 Respectfully submitted, wi~tia/m J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments iJILLBIDE HILLSIDE WILBON BANYAN fllBHLAND UPLAND BABELI#E FONTANA THE cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOI~A 4Ih -'*-** ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA Per City Council direction, staff and the BIA will hold a workshop on this issue on April 29, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall. Staff will re-agendize the item during the month of May. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:dlw Attachments R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REVISE EXEMPTIONS APPLICABLE TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Public Works Subcommittee's recommendation to amend Section 12.08 of the Municipal Code in order to revise exemptions applicable to public improvements required as a condition of approval for development applications. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: One of this City Council's goals has been a review of Ordinance 58 to determine how it could be made less burdensome to businesses seeking to expand their existing operations in our city. Ordinance 58 requires the construction of public improvements such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, street paving or widening, street lights and drainage structures. The City Council approved the proposed revisions and directed the City Attorney to draft revisions to Ordinance 58 including increasing the current thresholds for building addition exemptions and adding new exemptions regarding sidewalk construction and street light installation. Per the approval of the Public Works Subcommittee and the direction of the City Council, the amendments to the existing ordinance include the following: · Increasing the exemption threshold for commercial/office building additions from 500 square feet to 2,500 square feet · Increasing the exemption threshold for industrial building additions from 1,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REPORT ON ORDINANCE 58 APRIL 17, 2002 PAGE 2 · Addition of a sidewalk construction exemption for cases where required construction will create unnecessary hardship, inconsistency with existing improvements or be contrary to prudent engineering practices · Addition of a street light construction exemption for additions creating less than 500 lineal feet in additional street frontage In addition to approving the changes in this ordinance, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the Utilities Undergrounding Resolution and consider limiting its applicability to new construction only, thereby eliminating the requirement for undergrounding utilities for any building additions. Additionally, Councilmember Dutton directed staff to review the potential for using a sliding scale type of formula to try to make the cost of required public improvements directly proportionate to the cost of the .proposed building addition. It was decided by the Public Works Subcommittee that this type of process would be difficult to administer because of the inability of staff to verify the developers' cost to expand and the developers' cost to install improvements. This method could also make each application a moving target and result in inequities among projects. The Subcommittee determined that the proposed revisions to the existing ordinance will achieve Council goals in as clear and equitable a way as possible. The proposed revisions to Ordinance 58 will ease the financial burden on our local businesses and promote commercial and industrial expansion within our community. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:d O IN CE NO $/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING EXEMPTIONS APPLICABLE TO REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 12.08.045 of Chapter 12.08 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection "C" to read as follows: "C. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 12.08.040, the construction of a sidewalk will not be required where such construction will not be consistent with existing improvements or prudent engineering practices, or where to do so would cause unnecessary hardship as determined by the City Engineer. In determining whether an unnecessary hardship exists, the City Engineer shall take into account the relevant cost of sidewalk construction compared to the value of the proposed, private construction, as well as any other circumstances creating the unnecessary hardship. Nothing in this Section 12.08.045 shall excuse any failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act." Section 2. Section 12.08.050 of Chapter 12.08 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.08.050 Construction of public improvements - Exceptions. The provisions of Section 12.08.050 shall not apply to the following: A. Alterations which do not intensify the use of the building or structure or generate a greater hazard to public health and safety as determined by the City Engineer; B. Maintenance and/or reconstruction of a building or structure provided the total cost does not exceed fifty percent of the fair market value of the existing building or structure; C. Any addition or cumulative additions, within a sixty-month period, to an existing single-family residence, provided such addition or additions do not exceed a total area of 650 square feet; D. Any addition or cumulative additions, within a sixty-month period, to an existing commercial and/or office building totaling less than 2,500 square feet or to an existing industrial building totaling less than 10,000 square feet. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply if such addition or additions constitute more than fifty percent of the gross floor area of the existing building; E. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio covers, swimming pools, spas and similar structures accessory to a single-family residence; and 11231.0001\672610.1 F. Construction of accessory structures to a commercial/industrial/ office building, e.g., structural covers on existing outdoor storage, fuel pump building, carport structures over existing parking stalls and similar structures; provided such accessory structures do not intensify the use of the building or property. "Notwithstanding the foregoing, any addition or cumulative additions within a sixty-month period, to an existing single-family residence, commercial and/or office building, or industrial building creating additional street frontage less than 500 lineal feet, shall, upon approval of the City Engineer, be exempt from the requirement to install street lighting." Section 3. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. 11231.0001\672610.1 132- T H E CiTY OF I~AN Cfi 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: April 17, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AiCP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A review of the request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across Local Feeder Trails where they intersect with public streets - APN: 1089-081-01 through 14, and 1089-071-01 through 22. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) for the Belmont Equestrian Estates no._~t be amended to allow local feeder trails to be gated off. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the request on February 18, and 27, 2002. The Committee viewed the issues raised by the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates as a crime prevention problem for which gating off trails is not an appropriate solution. If the claims made by the residents, including children stealing construction materials from the backyard of a home enclosed by a 6-foot masonry wall are true, it is unclear how the installation of 6-foot high wrought iron gates across trail entrances will impact crime, vandalism or trespassing. The more appropriate solution to the problem is to utilize Police services including the Neighborhood Watch Program. Note that the Police Department held a Neighborhood Watch meeting with homeowners within the Tract in June of 2001. Since that time, the Police have not heard from any of the homeowners within the Tract wishing to implement a Neighborhood Watch. The Planning Commission reviewed the request on March 27, 2002 and upheld the recommendation of the Trails Advisory Committee. The Commission noted that the CC&R's were signed by the homeowners, prior to moving into their homes thereby acknowledging the existence of the local feeder trails as easements for the enjoyment of others. The Commission also reiterated the Trails Advisory Committee's stance that the matter is'more related to crime prevention and better solved by the homeowners making the effort to utilize Police services and notifying the administration of the Junior High school if school kids are causing any problems. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15915- BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES April17,2002 Page 2 Gating off the trails does not appear to solve any of the issues brought up by the homeowners. Furthermore, the City already allows the entrances to Local Feeder Trails to be gated with City approved gate design. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further details. Note that the report is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and contains it's own set of lettered exhibits, including the original report to the Trails Advisory Committee and a detailed chronology of events. CORRESPONDENCE: This is not a public hearing item, though as a courtesy, notices were mailed to the individual homeowners within the Belmont Equestrian Estates. Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 27, 2002 Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Minutes Dated March 27, 2002 THE CiTY OF ~ANCHO CLICAHONC, A S d:fRe x DATE: March 27, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across Local Feeder Trails where they intersect with public streets - APN: 1089-081-01 through 14, and 1089-071-01 through 22. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant wishes to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow Local Feeder Trails to be gated off. While not included in the request, this would also necessitate amendments to the Conditions of Approval for the tract, the General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan, the Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: This request was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on February 13, and 27, 2002. Refer to Exhibit "A" of this report for the history of this request. The Committee views the issues raised by the residents of Tract 15915 as a crime prevention problem, not a trail/gating problem. If the claims made by the residents, including children stealing construction materials from the backyard of a home enclosed by a 6-foot masonry wall are true, it is unclear how the installation of 6-foot high wrought iron gates across trail entrances will impact crime, vandalism, or trespassing. The more appropriate solution to the problem is to utilize Police services including the Neighborhood Watch Program. Note that the Police Department held a Neighborhood Watch meeting with homeowners within the tract in June of 2001. Since that time, the Police have not heard from any of the homeowners within the tract wishing to implement the Neighborhood Watch Program. Please refer to the attached Trails Advisory Committee staff report and action agenda for further details. Note that the Trails Advisory Committee report of February 13, 2002, contains its own set of exhibits. RECOMMENDATION: The Trails Advisory Committee recommends that the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 not be amended and that any gates installed within the tract shall meet the City's approved gate with step-thru design per Standard Drawing 1006-C. After the Commission hears testimony and deliberates on the item, the decision will be recorded as a minute action. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 15915- BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES March 27, 2002 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: This is not a public hearing item, though as a courtesy, notices were mailed to the individual homeowners within the Belmont Equestrian Estates. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Trails Committee Comment Sheet Dated February 13, 2002 Exhibit "B" - Trails Committee Action Agenda Dated February 27, 2002 Exhibit "C" - Petition by Belmont Equestrian Estates Residents Exhibit "D" - Excerpt from Preliminary Title Repor[ Regarding Private Easements TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET February 13, 2002 II. NEW BUSINESS B. TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across Local Feeder Trails at the intersection with public streets. APN: 1089-081-01 through 14, and 1089-071-01 through 22. BACKGROUND: Woodside Homes constructed the Belmont Equestrian Estates project located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Victoria Street. The tract is within the Very Low Residential Zone (1/2-acre lots) and subject to the provisions of the Equestrian Overlay District and was, therefore, required to install Local Feeder Trails and Community Equestrian Trails. The tract lies at the intersection of the planned north-south Community Trail extending northerly to connect with Wilson Avenue and the planned east-west Community Trail in the abandoned rail corridor as part of the Rails-to-Trails program. During construction, Woodside Homes installed several wrought iron gates across the entrances to private equestrian trails within the tract at the request of homeowners and in violation of the CC&Rs and the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Evidently, the homeowners were concerned that without the gates there would be insufficient security because the general public would use the private trails that go across their rear yards. The gates installed by Woodside Homes did not match the City standard design for equestrian trail gates insofar as no step-through or step-over provisions were included. Therefore, the rider of a horse would have had to dismount to open the gate (assuming it is unlocked) in order to use a trail. Prior to completing the project, Woodside Homes removed all of the substandard gates per staff direction with the exception of three gates. One gate is located at the northeast corner of Lot I (David and Angela Lowhee) at the intersection of George Court and Grape Place, and a second at the north corner of Lot 4 where it intersects the Community Equestrian Trail along the west tract boundary. These two gates were retrofitted with a City-approved modified horse step-over to allow unimpeded access for horses. The third gate is located at the northeast corner of Lot 32 (Bob and Brynda Fryan) on the south side of Saddleridge Drive just west o1 Etiwanda Avenue (Exhibit "K"). The Fryans installed this gate and, therefore, Woodside Homes could not remove it. The Fryans received a notice of violation from the City's Code Enforcement Division in Spring of 2001. The Fryans responded by addressing the City Council during oral communications. Planning staff was directed to attempt resolution of the matter to avoid further Code Enforcement proceedings. For several months, Planning Division staff attempted to negotiate either removal of the gate or installation of a step-over to allow unimpeded horse access to the trail with the Fryans. The Fryans requested several delays to ascertain whether open trails within the tract would in fact lead to problems and whether start of the school year at the junior high school on Etiwanda Avenue would result in students passing through the trails and causing problems. Staff inspected the trails on a weekly basis during the months of discussions with the Fryans and on no occasion found evidence "A" TRAILS AGENDA TT 15915- BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES February 13, 2002 Page 2 of any vandalism other than some construction debris in one trail that was related to a remodeling of one of the homes in the tract. In October of 2001, the Fryans stated that regardless of the lack of problems with any of the trails in the tract, they had no intention of removing their gate. The matter was brought before the City Prosecutor in late October 2001, and the Prosecutor agreed to delay making a final decision 0~ the case to allow the Fryans one month to attempt to amend the Development Code to allow for installation of gates across horse trails. The request before the Trails Advisory Committee is the Fryans' first step towards this attempt. The Fryans have removed the westerly half of their trail gate, but wish to re-install it. Please note the attached chronology of events dated November 8, 2001, (Exhibit "F") for further details. ANALYSIS: The applicant has maintained that the reason for their request is to prevent school children and potential miscreants from entering the trail and somehow harming their property. They also claim that Local Feeder Trails are private and that, therefore, they are free to construct gates across the trail. All of the trails within the tract, other than the easterly most trail traversing Fryans' property, are open or have step-throughs installed. Staff has inspected the site on multiple occasions over the past several months and has never found any evidence of trail vandalism, trespassing, graffiti, or any other supposed problems claimed by the applicant. The trails have been consistently maintained in a pristine condition. This has continued to be the case even for the trail traversing the Fryans' property after they eliminated half of their illegally installed gate to conform to City requirements. According to Police records, there have been seven calls for service in the past six months within the Belmont Equestrian Estates. All seven calls were false alarms from a single residence. The applicant is correct to a degree in that Local Feeder Trails are private property as opposed to public. However, there are specific trail easements that are recorded over the land to allow for unimpeded, continuous access to the trails for the purpose of accessing rear yards where horses are kept and to allow all owners within the tract to access the pubic Community Trail system. It appears that the homeowners within the tract deny the existence or validity of these easements. All property ownership is simply a bundle of property rights, and the Local Feeder Trail easements are part of that bundle that apply to all owners within a tract; they are not exclusive to the individual properties that they traverse. The applicant claims that the easement over their property is not a Local Feeder Trail because the City has violated the Municipal Code by building a drive approach across the trail. As shown in Exhibit "K," the drive approach has been installed within the public right-of-way, not the private trail. This is required per Condition 1 lb of Tract 15915. The applicant is apparently referencing Development Code Section 17.08.080.6.4, regarding prohibition of construction of structures within or across trails (Exhibit "G"). This does not pertain to drive approaches in the public right-of-way, but to those constructed within trails by private property owners to ensure safe passage of horses. TRAILS AGENDA TT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES February 13, 2002 Page 3 While not included in the requested modification to Belmont Equestrian Estates Tract CC&R's, the request for gating Local Feeder Trails will require an amendment to Development Code Section 17.08.070G-4, which states, "construction of any structure within or across the trail easement, including walls and fences, gates, planters, sidewalks, drive approaches, or similar structure, or installation of any vegetation, irrigation system, device, or obstacles of any kind are prohibited." If this section of the Code were to be amended, it would apply to the entire City, not just the Belmont Estates tract. The request will also require an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan (within which the subject tract lies) that requires the implementation of a "continuous system of...equestrian trails consisting of...privately maintained Feeder Trails." The Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan amendments necessary to accommodate the applicant's request would be contrary to the intent of the General Plan and Trails Implementation Plan to provide unimpeded, continuous and convenient access to the Community Trail System. Therefore, these documents would also have to be amended to accommodate the applicant's request. The request violates the Conditions of Approval for Tract 15915 and associated Development Review 99-01. Therefore, in addition to the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan amendments mentioned above, the homeowners would have to process a Condition Modification for the tract and associated development review subject to review by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. Staff sees no justification for amending the Conditions of Approval for the tract related to trail improvements, as this would conflict with applicable rules as described above and there is no evidence that any problems exists to be mitigated by such a modification. The Trails Implementation Plan has a provision for trail abandonment. To abandon a trail within a tract, 100 percent of the homeowners within the tract must approve. The Trails Advisory Committee then considers the requested abandonment and a recommendation is forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration at a public hearing. If the Planning Commission approves the requested trail abandonment, the homeowners then must prapara an amended Final Tract Map for consideration by the City Council and ultimately recordation. Staff does not support abandonment of trails within the tract as the Equestrian Overlay District provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan apply to the site (Exhibit "H"), and there is no justification for special treatment of this tract as opposed to other development subject to the Equestrian District provisions. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Committee discuss the proposal, keeping in mind that the Belmont Equestrian Estates tract is not an isolated island of development. It fits into the overall community, including the elaborate Community and Regional trail system that is a key component of the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and enj.oyed by many thousands of residents. The requested gating off of Local Trails requires modifications to overall City requirements that would apply citywide, thereby, undermining years of consistent effort at creating the trails network. Even if the tract could be treated individually to quell the homeowner's concerns, this would set a precedent that could be used by others in the community to argue for additional horse trail gating, again undermining the community-wide trail system. There are already provisions in the regulations that TRAILS AGENDA TT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES February 13, 2002 Page 4 allow for gating off of trails so long as a step-though is provided to allow unimpeded equestrian access. This has proven to be a reasonable and safe method for securing vehicle control of Local Feeder Trails throughout the City's history. Finally, there is no evidence to validate any of the security concerns raised by the applicant. Therefore, staff is unable to discern any value either to the Belmont Equestrian Estates or the City at large to gating off Local Feeder Trails. Staff Planner: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Applicant's letter dated January 16, 2002 Exhibit "B" Letter to City Council (no date) Exhibit "C" Letter to City Prosecutor dated November 19, 2001 Exhibit "D" Excerpts from CC&R's for Tract 15915 Exhibit "E" Location Map Exhibit "F" Chronology dated November 8, 2001 Exhibit "G" Development Code Excerpt Exhibit "H" Etiwanda Specific Plan Excerpt Exhibit "1" Conditions for Tract 15915 Exhibit "J" Step-through Detail Exhibit "K" Photos /¥0 Robert & Brynda Fryan 7055 Isle Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91739 (909) 463-0939 January 16, 2002 City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTN: Brad Bullet 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Buller: As requested, I am sending to you the demand in writing in order to be.placed on the Trails Advisory Committee agenda on February 13,2002. We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. Thank you again for assisting us in our efforts. Sincerely, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIlA Brynda Fryan JAN 16 211 Belmont Equestrian Estates Representative RECEIVED - PLANNINll cc: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner Trail Advisory Committee Brent Le Count lq/ Mr. Mayor and council, My name is Brynda Fryan and I reside at 7055 Isle Ct. Rancho Cucamonga. I am representing myself and the majority of the Belmont estates homeowners. The issue we are addressing is the right to erect fences across our private equestrian access. I live in lot 32 and have already, with the permission of Doug Norton the housing superintendent, put gates up. I was sited by a municipal code stating that: Construction of any structure within or across the trail easement, including walls and fences, gates, planters, sidewalks, drive approaches, or similar structures, etc. are prohibited. (RCMC 17.08.070G.4) First, let me point out that this private access is not a "local feeder trail." If it wore a feeder trail then the city would already be in violation of the municipal · code due to the drive approach in front of every access. However, if you read our CC&R they clearly state that Said easement is for private equestrian purposes No where does it refer to the easement as a community feeder trail. Therefore, one can only denote from the action taken by code enforcement that they are trying to enforce a municipal code on a private access thus changing said access to a public access. I also feel that by allowing the city to use my land it would eventually change my easement from private to prescriptive and thus causing adverse possession of my land. I would only be willing to let the city take over this easement if they are willing to take on the liability, maintenance, and taxes that I am now required to abide by. That would require the city to buy the property and reassess the access as a feeder trail instead of a private equestrian access. Knowing full well that the city would not be willing to do this, I feel that it is within my rights as a private homeowner to fence and or gate said properties in order to protect and secure our families and properties. Therefore, all I am asking for tonight is to be placed on the agenda so that myself and all parties of this action will be in attendance. LAW OFFICES OF FRED J. KNEZ 0 a uc ° 18493 Halter Lane P. O. BOX 70090 ~1 ~' ~ RIVERSIDE, CA 92513 o DLik~\ ~,h: 1~o9~ ?o~.ts32 ?,~'%rcN~'D Fax: 1~o9~ VIA FACSIMILE/909-477-2847 ORIGINAL BY MAIL November 19, 2001 Cynthia W. Blayloek Deputy City Prosecutor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 4807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: My clients: Brenda & Bob Fryan Dear Ms. Blaylock: As you know from our meeting on October 30, 2001, I represent Bob & Brenda Fryan with regard to their dispute with the City of Rancho Cucamonga concerning the easement referenced in your of October 16, 2001. By your letter of October 16, 2001, and the statements made at the aforementioned meeting, you have threatened criminal action against Mr. & M_~. Fryan unless they remove what you describe in your letter of October 16, 2001, as a "structure" which you claim is, "across a trail easement" and constitutes a "unsafe and/or non passable obstruction" on their property: 7055 Isle Court. At the meeting of October 30, 2001, you agreed to a thirty day extension before initiating any criminal action. Since that time, Mr. & Mrs. Fryan have tried to work with the City to reach a reasonable compromise regarding this dispute. However, the City has refused to even allow Mr. & Mrs. Fryan to even appear before the City Council regarding this matter. Since an informal resolution does not appear possible at this juncture, Mr. & Mrs. Fryan have taken down the "structure" (gate) on their properW at 7055 Isle Court under protest and with a reservation of all rights. Mr. & Mm. Fryan dispute the action of the City and contend that the City is violating their rights. As you know fxom our meeting on October 30t~, no one in the Belmont neighborhood own horses; ~,,~[,utFere are no barns, horse corals: and the residences are all landscaped. Mr. & Mrs. Fryan have tr '*C'° Cynthia W. Blaylock November 19, 2001 Page Two previously submitted a Petition to the City by the residents of the Belmont neighborhood clearly expressing their opposition to the actions of the City. All of the Title documents to the Fryan property clearly indicate that the easement in question is a private easement, not a public easement. The Belmont neighborhood is not a gated enmmunity. Therefore, the action of the City constitutes a conversion of the easement fi'om a private easement to a public easement. By forcing the Fryans and others in the neighborhood to take down their gates, the City is converting the easement to. a public easement for use by anyone. Yet, the City has not agreed to be responsible for maintenance of the easement or assume liability for any damage to the . property of the residents. It is our position that during the pendency of this dispute and until a final resolution, the City is responsible for maintenance of the easement and is also responsible for any personal injury or property damage resulting from access to the easement by the public at large. Sincerely, FJK/mlk co: Bob & Brenda Fryan co: Bill Alexander, Mayor cc: Larry Henderson, Planner c~ Recorded Jn Off 'al Record., County o~ "~ "' -~: .... '"" ." .""~ ~'~.~'s~ "' San Ber~rdl~, ~rry ~lklr, Rearer ,. _.-m '" D°c No. 2 289615 First erim'T/tleB R~cho S~ta M~ CA 92698 ~ ~ ~ DE~ON OF CO~N~S, CO~I~ONS ~ ~~0~ AU6 2 2 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 36, ~c~v~ of~ No. I~91S, ~ ~ ~ a Su~ ~, md ~ ~ ~ ~e ~efit of~ ~ of~e p~. ARI~CLE I 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise expressly provided, thc following words and phrases when mod hcr~in have the following spocUied m~anin~. · l.l City. City means thc C/ly of Rancho Cucamonga, Cai/fora/., and i~ various departm~mts, divisions, employees and repreacntative$. Close of Escrow means the date on which a deed is Recorded conveying a Lot. 1.3 County. County means the County of San Bcmardino in the State of California, and its various dep~,lmcn~ divisions, employees and reprasentalive$. / dT/~ TITLE CO, AS AN ACCOMMODATION ONLY, IT Hie; NOT BI[EN EXAMINED AS TO ITS EXECUT/ON OF. ~ ?O ?TS I ~FEET t..mON TITLK..~. 4.2 ~tut~~. Each wall Or fence which is built ss a part of the ori~nal construction of tM Residences upon thc Properties and wMch borders an equcslrian ~ (as depicted in ~h¢ Recorded subdivision map) (an "Equestrian Fence") shall be maintained and repaired by the Ova. er of tho Lot on which the Equestrian Fence is situated. Except as otherwise allowed by S~ction 4.4 of this Declaration, such maintenance and repair shall msintnln and r~tore the Equestrian Fence to an ~pearanen that is substantially simil~r to its original design. 4.3 . ~. Each Owne~ grants en easement to the public for an Equestrian Trail over that portion of Owner's Lot as depicted in the Recorded subdivision map. Bach Owncr is rasponsl'bl~ to keep the Equestrian Trail easement over that Owner's Lot in a safe and passable msnnor which does not dc~ac~ from the usc or appearance of the trail and in a manner censistcnt with thc following standards: · · 4.3.1 Scrap lumber, junl~ tr~,~h; storag~ or debris is ~,oMbimt; 4.~.2 Abandoned, discarded, or trouped ob.~e~ or / equipment, such as automobile, automo6.vo pm*m, ~lm'e., ·: stoves, refrigerators, cans, cove,,era, or similar items, are. ~!.~ prolu'bit~l; ". ~'. "* ";:' 4.3.3 Trail m~mcc m~l prol~r grade ~ be continun~dy excessive ~ rock~, m~n$ of pot hole~, remo .~d ofwced~ mf~lllng of ruts caused by mosion or otbet dismrbenc,~. Tim trail surface shall be continuously maintained with sur~_ eln_a matmq, als 4.3.4 .Ccmsmmtion 0fany structure withh~ or aaross tho trail easement, including walls and fence~, gate~ plentm% sidownfl% chive sploroaches or ~qmilar structures, or installation of any vcgeta~on or irrigation systam or d~.vico or obstacles of any ia,~d are proln'bited; 4.3.5 Trail fence~ and gate~ shall bo k~pt in good repair at all times, including rcplucing damaged members end maintaining plumb. This sbnl!'not preclude the prope~y owner frcan r~placing the e0dsting m61 fence with another fence or wall material. 4.~.6 Drainage swales, curb and gur~r, or similar drainage slructur~s, slmL1 bo k~t clean end free of dobzis, trash, soil, vegetation, or othm' material in a mannor that p=~iiilts pzopm' 8 4.4 W/dj and Fen¢in£ Replacement. In thc event any Owner chooses to erect a wall or fence that entirely replaces any of the fences and walls that orlg/nally constructed, thc r~laccment wall or fence shall meet thc following 4.4.1 In the case of thc cqucstr/an-typ¢ fencing bordering an ]~ques~an Trail, thc original fence m~y be r~placed only with a fence of substantially the same equestriaa-typo design~ An Owner may construct an add/~onal fence or wail/x~/d¢ the eque~aian fence, pwvid~ such additional f~nce or wall is constructed of wrought-iron or wrought-aluminum materials or m~ry block, and prov/ded that such wall or fence/s ~milar/n dedgn to otlm' ofig/nal construct/on in tho Properties. Ifa masom'y block wall/s con.~ucted, the wall shall be a split.-faced des/gn and should be ~milar/n color, type and com~uct/on to the masonry and dd~ard block walls orighally constra~/n the and cons/st~nt with plans and specifications attached as E~rhibR gA". Any wrought-/ton or wrought-ab~m[num £e~ng shall be condstent with the phn~ and sp~c/ficati~ns an-thai as Exhflflt "B". The add/fional wall or lento shall b~ c~mmw~ twalw /nches (12") in.~de thc equestr/au fenc~ lin~. The ~placeme~t wall .,.: or f~ac~ mu~t not block tho.F, qu~i~a Trail easement. The ..... -:.. tho ~luestrian Trail that is. tea foot (10') in width. Rzgardl~s of any additional wall or £eaeX ~fizat is constnv~ on a Lot, oath ::: Owner .nhAll remain respons~lo unde~ this Doclarafion to that gortion of tho Equestrian Trail that i~ on tho Owner's Lot. 4.42 /a tho case ora sid~ feac~ or wall, any replacement must bo SUbstantially similar in design to original construction and marlo of wood (con~i~mt with tho pl,,-~ specifications in Exhibit "C"), or mu~t bo of masonry block construction as described in 4.4.1. /fa sidzyant feacz or wall i~ a Party Wall, thea both Owners must agr~ regarai,~g tho grop0~t imgrovomeat. 4.4.3 In tho case of tho wrought-iron fotura fencing that is orig~nallyconstructod in tho Pwpe~ies, aay t~,placement mu~t bo · substantially similar in design to ori~/nAl.oonstraction and marlo of · wrought iron (consisteat with Exla~lt "B~), or must bo of masomy block constru~on as de. sca'bed in 4.4.1. VICTORIA Modifmd ¢~mte I..oc~io -- Modified ~te I..e~dlon ~. JESSIE .EF ~E I.omtion Future Reglo~ml Trail Community Troll Psrcels.shp TRACT 15915 LOCATION MAP 200 0 200 400 Feet T H E C I T Y 0 F l ~ANCItO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: November 8, 2001 TO:. Brad Buller, City Planner FROM: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Bob and Brynda Fyran Horse Trail Gate Issue Chronology Spdng 2001- Bob and Brynda Fryan install a wrought iron gate across the opening to the private equestrian trail traversing the rear of their lot at the northeast comer of Lot 32 of Tract 15915 (7055 Isle Court). The gate has a lock mechanism but has been unlocked on the occasions staff has tded it. Soon thereafter, W0odside Homes installs several similar wrought iron gates across the entrances to pdvate equestrian trails within the tract at the request of homeowners. Evidently, the homeowners were concerned that without the gates there would be insufficient security and the general public and potential miscreants would use the pdvate trails that go across their rear yards. April 2, 2001 - Code Enforcement notifies Bob and Brynda Fryan that the gate they've installed violates Code Section 17.08.070 (G). May 3, 2001 - The Fryan's come to the Planning counter and talk with Brent Le Count who explains that while their trail is private it is an easement over their property for the enjoyment of all property owners within the. tract. He reminds the Fyrans that they own a home within an equestrian community and that they are required to allow unimpeded access to equestrians. He provides them with a step thru detail. May 7, 2001 - Bob Fryan tells Code Enforcement that he will not remove or modify his gate, that he and the City will have to agree to disagree and that he'll see us in court. May 22, 2001 - Staff not/fes Woodside Homes in wrffing that the gates will have to be removed or mod/fed to allow step thru provisions. June 6, 2001 - Brynda Fryan speaks before the City Council on the issue. Brad Buller is directed by Council to work with the Fryana to resolve the matter. June 7, 2001 - Planning staff notify Code Enforcement to put the case on hold until further notice and that Planning will work with Fryans to resolve the matter. June 19, 2001 - Staff reminds Woodside Homes that gates must be removed or mod/fed. Iq? Page 2. November 8, 2001 Bob and Brynda Fyran Horse Trail Gate Issue Chronology July 12, 2001 - Brad Buller meets with homeowners within the Belmont Estates Tract at Bob' and Brynda Fryan's home to discuss the horse trail gating matter. Brad explains the City requirement for unimpeded access to horse trails, that while the trials are private they are meant to be used by every homeowner in the tract, and that to his knowledge there has been only one court case challenging the existence and function of pdvatehorse trails in the City and it was turned down. Brad suggests a compromise in which the gates remain in place but a 42-inch wide, 14-inch high step thru/over is cut into each gate to allow unimpeded access to the trails by equestrian users. Brad tells the homeowners they can also install "No Trespassing" or "Private Property" signs on the gates, July 19, 2001 - Woodside Homes refuses to install the gate step thrus and states they will either leave the gates in place or tear them out. Staff has Woodside remove the gates but requests that they make provisions for homeowners to keep the gates in case they wish to modify them and re-install them later on. July 24, 2001 - Woodside Hom~s removes all of the gates from private horse trails with the exception of the gate installed by Fryan and the gates along the south tract boundary separating the trails from the abandoned railroad right of way. David and Angela Lowhee modify two gates with step thrus (those on the east and west ends of the northern most private trail) and re-install them consistent with staff direction. Staff discusses the matter with Bob Fryan, he requests that we wait one month to see how things work out with the modified Lowhee gate. August 22, 2001- 8taft contacts Angela Lowhee to see if the step-over has led to any problems, and according to Angela it had not. Bob and Brynda Ftyan are unavailable to discuss the matter but staff talks with Bob Fryan Jr. who states they are adamant about keeping the gate installed as is regardless of Lowee's experience. September 4, 2001 - Mr. Fryan said that he is not ready to make a decision until school starts. He wants to wait until the end of September to see if school kids cause problems with Lowhee's trail. Staff agrees to contact Mr. Fryan at the end of September. October 1, 2001 - Bob Fryan states that he does not intend to remove or modify his gate in any way, that there is greffifi on other trail fences in the tract, that he had found 45 empty beer cans piled up on one trail, and that several linear feet of trail fencing had been removed by Junior High School kids on another trail. Staff visited the site within an hour of the discussion with Mr. Fryan and found all of the trails to be in pristine condition with the exception of one private treil that had a pile of lumber in it related to construction of a home remodel in the tract. Staff contacted David Lowhee who stated that there have been no problems with the trail and gate step thru, even with school in session. Early October 2001 - Staff notifies Code Enforcement that Fryan has refused to cooperate with staff's request for gate modification and that the Code Enforcement precess should proceed. October 30, 2001 - The matter is brought before the City Prosecutor. It is agreed that the Fryans take one month so see if they can convince the City Council to change the code requirements related to horse trail access. Page 3 November 8, 2001 Bob and Brynda Fyran Horse Trail Gate Issue Chronology November 7, 2001 - Brynda Fryan tells Brad Buller that she is willing to tear out half of her gate now and in the future seek a code amendment to allow private equestrian trails to be gated off. h\brent\tracts\woodsidechmn.mem Rancho Cucamonffa Development Code Section 17.08.070 2. Recreational vehicle parking'shall only be permitted within an enclosed garage, carport, or a similar structure, or if.outdoors, in an authorized off-street paved parkingarea. All other parking or ~torage shall be prohlbit~d. 3. Authorized parking areas. Authorized outdoor parking areas shall' be limited to the locations and conditions described below: a. Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored in side or rear yard areas, provided that such areas are screened from view from the street, public right-of-way, and adjacent properties by a legally constructed fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least 5 feet in height; b. Recreationai vehicle parking areas within side and rear yards shall be limited to 5 percent of the total lot area or 500 square feet, whichever is greater, unless construCted pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review; · c. Recreational vehicle may also be parked within public view in authorized parking areas within the front yard, or comer side yard abutting a street, for temporary periods of time not to exceed 48 hours, except as noted in paragraph d below. d. Time limits established in paragraph c may be waived for a specific property when all of the following c~nditions can be demonstrated: (1) Current owner, or resident has resided on said property since prior to December 31, 1991; and (2) Current owner or resident has owned a recreational vehicle since prior to December 31, 1991, while residing on the property;, and (3) Property in question cannot reasonably accommodate recreational vehicle storage in the side or rear yard; and (4) Recreational vehicle may only be parked or stored on a paved surfaco located between the driveway and the nearest side property line; and (5) Property in question is NOT located within the Planned Communities of Caryn, Term Vista, or Victoria. 4. Parkinq area maintenance. All parking areas within public view from the street, public ~ght-of-way, or adjacent properties shall be surfaced with a permanent paving material. Such areas shall be maintained in good usable condition, free of potholes and broken sections to prevent the accumulation of mud, dust, and weeds, and shall be kept free of debds, dirt, and other loose materials. 5. Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an infraction. {~ Trail Maintenance. Ail local feeder trails shall be maintained by the proper~ Local Feeder owner in a safe and passable manner which does not detract from the use or appearance of the trail and in a manner consistent with the following standards: 1. Scrap lumber, junk, trash, storage, or debris is prohibited. /: Rancho Cucamon~a Development .Code Section 17.08.080 *~ 2. Abandoned discarded, or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles~automotive parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, can.s; containem, or similar items, are prohibited. 3. Trail surface and pro~)er grade shall be Continuously maintained for safety and 'ridability, including removal of excessive size rocks, filling o.f pot holes, removal of weeds, and ' refilling of rots caused by erosion or other disturbances. The trail surface shall be continuously maintained with surfacing material consistent with City Standards, ) of any within or across the trail easement, including walls structura ConslnJction and fences, gates,' planters, sidewalks, drive approaches or similar structures, or installation of any vegetation or irrigation system or device or Obstacles of any kind are prohibited. 5.Vegetation shall be kept cleared from encroaching intO the trail to a height of 10 feet and to the full width of the trail. 6, Trail fences and gates shall be kept in good repair at all times, including replacing . damaged members and maintaining plumb. This shall not preclude the property owner from replacing the existing trail fence with another fence or wall material. 7. Drainage swales, curb and gutter, or similar drainage structures, shall be kept clean and free of debris, trash, soil, vegetation, or other material in a manner that permits proper drainage. Section 17,08,080 - Performance Standards ~' A. intent. The intent of this section is to protect properties in all residential disfi'icts and the health ""~"~ and safety of pemons from environmental nuisances and hazards and to provide a pleasing environment in keeping with the nature of the residential character. The performance standards set maximum tolerance limits on adverse environmental effects created by any use or development of land. B. Administration and Measurement. The standards of this section shall be enforced by the City Planner. Upon discovery of any apparent violation of these standards, the City Planner shell investigate using such instruments as may be necessary. If a violation is found to exist, the violation shall be abated as a nuisance as prescribed in the Municipal Code. C. Exemetions. The following sources of nuisances are exempt from the provisions of this section. 1. Emergency equipment, vehicles and devices. 2. Temporary construction, maintenance, or demolition activities between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., except Sundays and National holidays. D. Noise. No operation or activity shall cause any source of sound at any location or allow the creation of noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the Ambient Base noise levels to exceed the following standards, and as contained in Section 17.02.120. 17 riP,-43 3/01 /7.3 £ancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08.090 Proper grading techniques that are sensitive to natural conditions must be utilized for reasons of public safety, maintenance, aesthetics, and environmental protecfion: The following guidelines are suggested. a. Minimize the amount of site grading needed for development and utility construction through proper site planning. b. Grade land and landscape in workable increments to avoid exposing vast expanses of bared earth at any given time to minimize soil erosion. c. Development in the foothills should relate to the slope in order to preserve the integrity of the hillside and minimize disruption of natural ground form. Adapt all structures in such areas to natural ground form through the use of split pads, built- up foundations, stepped footings, stem walls, etc. d. In hillside areas, development to be designed to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer views to residents. e. Roadway alignments and gradients to be designed and located to avoid excessive grading and to reflect the existing land forms. f. Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend in with the existing terrain and present a more natural appearance. Establish proper soil management techniques to reduce the adveme effects (i.e., erosion) of grading. h. Provide driveways with a maximum slope of 15 percent. i. Provide an 18-foot area in front of the garage that does not exceed 5 percent. Minimize slopes between lots to preserve privacy. Where slopes cannot be minimized, mitigate concerns through other means, i.e., landscaping, fencing, etc. k. Minimize disruption of existing natural features, such as trees and other significant vegetation, natural ground forms, rock outcroppings, water, and views. I. Undulate berms to screen parking areas. 10. Fire Safety. Development should be designed in accordance with Fire District requirements for two points of safe and ready access. Areas designated as high fire hazard areas should minimize fuel buildup around residences through greenbelts or cultivated fuel breaks. 11. Trensitlon of Density. The site plan should consider compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods through providing proper transition of density, particularly on infill sites adjacent to lower densities. Comparable densities, open space buffer zones, increased setbacks, and architectural compatibility are encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper transition of density. Clustering units can provide large open space areas as a buffer. ( The of Rancho Cucamonga places significant emphasis on the development Trails.. City of regional, community, and local feeder trails. The General Plan establishes a trail system to provide an interconnected network of trails linking to parks, shopping, and 17.08-50 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.090 employment centers with residential areas. To this end, the following guidelines should be considered: a. All new developments are to be designed in accordance with the Master Plan of Trails and adopted trail standards. b. Maintain trails on natural surfaces (i.e., no grading) and locate along natural features whenever possible. c. Consider existing bicycling, pedestrian, and equestrian access and traditional travel routes through the property, particularly, routes to schools. d. Within the Equestrian/Rural Area, provide trail connections through easements in order to connect disconnected trails and for needed access to recreation activities. e. Provide local feeder trails on the rear of residential lots for equestrian access and related equestrian service access within the Equestrian/Rural Area. f. Provide a means of public access to regional trails within subdivisions. g. Within subdivisions, provide an intemal loop trail system of local feeder Irails. · h. Plot houses to provide reasonable rear yard opportunity for the keeping of homes and other animals within the Equestrian/Rural Area. i.Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard of all residential lots within the Equestrian/Rural Area. J. Grade access fn3m the corral area to the trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. ,,,, ~ 13. Street Deslan. Vary street pattern to reduce streetscape monotony. Curvllinear streets, cul-de-sacs, front yard landscaping, and single-loaded streets are encouraged to provide streetscape variety and visual interest, particularly in the Low-Medium District. 14. House Plottino. Clustering houses around common space, zero lot line, reverse plotting, angling house to the strset, and side entnj garages may be permitted If they provide streetscape variety and visual interest particularly in the Low-Medium District. 15. Multi-Family DeveloDment. Well thought-out site planning is crucial in the development of successful projects. In addition to other standards outlined in the Development Cede, the following should be considered: a. Relate the location'of site uses with adjoining properties to avoid possible conflicts and take advantage of mutual potentials. b. Consider sharing curb cuts with adjoining properties. c. Buildings which are skewed in relationship to each other can create a variety of view orientations and streetscepe interests. d. Provide adequate common open space, including recreational facilities, tot lots, and large open lawn areas. 17.08-51 6/99 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 The proposed use or project meets the intent of the CS/OL District and will enhance the visual and historical character of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings. .405 Parking: Off-street parking shall be provided as prescribed in the Development Code, and as follows: (a) All parking areas shall be located behind required street setback lines. (b) All parking areas shall be screened from Etiwanda Avenue by carefully designed walls, fences, berming, shrubs, trees and other landscape elements consistent with the design character of Etiwanda Avenue. (c) All parking areas and lighting shall be carefully buffered from adjacent residential uses. .406 Signs: No sign, outdoor advertising, structure, or display of any type shall be permitted, except as prescribed in the residential section of the Sign Ordinance, and except that the following signs may be approved in conjunction with a Conditional Use: (a) Wall or attached signs, limit of two per building, one per use. (b) total sign area not to exceed 1/3 square feet for 1 linear foot of building frontage, butno more than 20 square feet total, per building or 12 square feet per any one sign. (c) All signs shall be designed to enhance the visual quality of the structures. Intedor illuminated signs shall not be permitted. .501 Purpose: In addition to meeting the provisions of Chapter 3, the purpose of the EQ/OL District is to provide the opportunity for keeping horses for personal use in residential areas. .,,~ .502 EQ/OL District Boundaries: EQ/OL District provisions shall apply to all residential properties located north of Route 30, and to all residential properties abutting a Community Equestrian Trail. .503 Equestrian Uses Permitted: Keeping of homes in conjunction with a residential use, subject to the limitations of this article. As used in the EQ/OL District, "keeping of homes' shall mean and include maintaining, grazing, riding, leading, exercising, tying, hitching, stabling, and allowing to run at large. When Master Planned and developed under Optional. "tv" ( Etiwanda Specific P/an Part II, Chapter 5 Development Standards, an equestrian-oriented residential project may include accessory equestrian uses such as riding rinks and academies, and feed and tack stores, and the like. .504 Keeping of Horses in Projects Developed under Basic Development Standards: Minimum Lot Size: 20,000 sq. ft. No more than one horse/10,000 sq. ft. of lot ama up to a total of six horses. .505 Keeping of Horses in Projects Developed under Optional Development Standards: Up to one horse/10,000 sq. ft. of t0tal proiect area, provided however, that no horees may be kept on individual lots smaller than 20,000 sq. fL .505 Feeder Trails: Feeder Trail easements shall be required as a condition of trsct map apprsval or development review, to provide access to each lot or site intended for equestrian use. As a minimum, each development, including non-residential uses should provide at least one connection across the project site, with the intention of providing a contiguous system of Feeder Trail easements, in accordance with Article 5.33.300. .507 Fenced Enclosurs: Enclosure used to confine horees shall maintain a height of a least 5 feet and shall be of such construction as to preclude the escape of horses. .508 Setbacks: The location of corrals, fenced enclosures, barns, stables, stalls, and similar enclosures used to confine horses shall conform to all street setback requirements. Such enclosurss shall be kept minimum 70 feet away from rssidences on adjoining lots. .600 sS/eL - Special Studies Overlay District .601 Pumose It is the purpose of the Special Studies Oveday Distdct to implement provisions of the City's General Plan Public Health and Safety Element relative to seismic safety requirements mandated by the Alquist-Pdolo Act. .602 Special Studies Overlay Distdct Boundaries The provisions of this article shall apply to all land identified in F!gure 5-4. .603 Special Provisions All development within the Special Studies Overlay District shall be subject to the provisions of the Alquist-Pdolo Special Studies Act. 5-24 4/96 Project No. ~1' 15915 Completion Date C. Bite Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __/____ site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions o~ Approval shall be / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for I consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. If no centralized trash receptacles ara provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all raceptacles shielded from public view. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction office City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the I I adopted Street Naming Policy pdor fo approval of the final map. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. )A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and pdor to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., pdvate equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch Iodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement; however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians orhay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimumddveapproach. Entrance may be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. Completion Date c. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official. d. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feel 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine __/____ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessify of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&R's. 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs firsL A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public no§ce requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 16. Six-foot decorative bloc~( walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall / condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. 17. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / / support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two %-inch lag belts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 18. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealanL / / 19. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to __1 maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 20. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. /__ 21. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. ---/m D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping / / in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits or pdor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ..._./~/ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The PRNATE LOCAL FE. EDER .' TRAIL POSTTO CHNN GATEOPEN~~§, .~ ~.: SPUT RAIL GATE WITH STEP THROUGH ~' I '~. / I r SOIL SURFACE RAOIUS OF 6' · . · ' · . ,, · ~'-BLOCK WALL . '- ' ' ";~" ' '. 4._~- .4...~,..~' ¢ , ~PRm. ~' ~H. SIR£ffF , Pm ciTY oF R.C. I§' METAL PLATE TO BLOCK WALL BLOCK WALl. 5 2. HINGE CREATED BY WELDING CROSS MEIWBERS TO A 3' GAI.VANIZED STEEL PIPE SLEEVE WITH CAP SLIPPED OVER 2 1/2' UPRIGHT GATE POST. · ' 3. SINK POSTS 40'. GATE SHALL NOT SW1NO INTO PUBUC R.O.W. 4. CHAIN SHNJ. BE 5/8" X 1 3/4' X 1 1/4' MIlD STEEL AT 18' LONG. .5. LOCK SHALL BE PROV1DED BY THE CI1Y. 5. SEE TRAIL NOTES STD. NO. 1001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~'.~.~/8~C~' ~ '(a/~p~R TR , CALIFORNIA · i/,./)Tzd/ '# AIL: 15' V ,HICL . cA'r Sm , ACC .SS 006-C ~I~Y.~,E:t~... 5 ~ '/~T~'I USE: WITH STANDARD SPE:(,n'IC~r;0iI[S FOR PUBUC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?'~ ,~ ,,..~.~..~ TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2002, @ 6:00 PM TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA I. ROLL CALL: X Carlson X Stewart A Clopton X Tolstoy X Buller X Dickey (Alternate) X Jarek __ Mannerino (Alternate) X __ Mitchell Zupke (Alternate) I1. OLD BUSINESS A. TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across local feeder trails at the intersection with public streets. APN: 1089-081-01 through 14, and 1089-071-01 through 22. (Continued to February 27, 2002). ACTION: The Committee views the issues raised by the residents of Tract 15915 as a crime prevention problem, not a trail/gating problem. If the claims made by the residents, including children stealing construction materials from the backyard of a home enclosed by a 6-foot masonry wall are true, it is unclear how installation of 6-foot high wrought iron gates across trail entrances will impact crime, vandalism, or trespassing. The more appropriate solution to the problem is to utilize Police services, including the Neighborhood Watch Program. The Committee recommends that the CC&R's for Tract 15915 not be amended and that any gates installed within the tract shall meet the current gate with step-thru design per Standard Drawing 1006-C. III. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. iT¥ OF RANCHO CUCAMONG - F£~ Z 3 2002 Thc collective owners of these properties purchased ~om Belmont Equestrian Estates petition ~e fi~t to ke~ ~e ~51~_ PLANNING · c~ private ~ails. ~csc gates ensure scc~ against Potential pe~etrators, hcludhg those who would v~dalize the trails ~Wor drop ~h. ~ese fences provide safeW for o~ers ~d peace of mhd~) for~e homeo~.~ 2 ~~'~'~~/~~ ~ 23) ~~ * ~' ~_,, ~* ~' 2s) 9) 29) ]o) ~'1~ 3o) 11) ~~ ~ ~/~ ~) ~ 37) 38) ~ 39) We, the residems of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bernadino, Ca. I~~_~n in agreement of this demand. We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, fntt~.; ,(. ~a~3/4.,am in agreemem of this demand. Signed ~ lot ~ /~-7~ ~~ ~-~- We, the residems of the Belmom Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. i _,? t /_t am in agreement of this demand. Signed lot We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cueamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~; e~/~g/~OeTm, am in agreement of this demand. Signed ~. lot We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are reqhesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bema[tino, Ca. I, ,,Jo14~, #oo~,, ]-t~'-/,am in agreemem of this demand. lot /0- We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian EstateS, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bernadino, Ca. I, ~-~ /'~,,~(~n in agreement of this demand. / / Signed .~/./~)-~ lot /~ /7/ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I~greement of this demand. Signed lot /5-- /7,2 We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I,~/0~/~/, am in agreement of this demand. Signed~ lot / -f 173 We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga~ county of San Bemardino, Ca. I, ff~;c~**g//~at~,'~ o am in agreement of this demand. Lot [~ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. ~s-/1(, ~/¥,_~/~50,d, am in agreement of thls..demand. ///' . si dL - · ' 175 We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height Private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I?~;,.~,~L~-, am in agreement of this demand. Signed lot We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San . Bemadino, Ca. I,c?ZTro~ , am in agreement of this demand. Signed ~ lot ~,~/ /77 We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~ C<~ ,mia in agreement of this demand. ~-~ ~ ~ Signed ~~,~.4 ~,~-..--.~ lot 2. 2.. We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~[d e~rl '%q_~, am in agreement of this demand. lot We, the residents of the Belmom Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ?4~va ~d~rn~itn agreement of this demand. /. <. We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I,~,~ Cr>zo¢o, am in agreement 0fthis demand. lot 7/23c We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do.this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~/~4z//~w~ in agreement of this demand. // , - Signed ~ lot '~b'~ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences.. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~4~/~D]~?_. , am in agreement of this demand. Signed ~ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho CucamOnga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, .~.C)~' , am in agreement of this demand. Signed We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I, ~t~l I~. ~[~[ am in agreement of this demand. Signedlot ~ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I. ~ 4~~ in agreement of this demand. Signed ~~~ lot ~ ~ t We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the Openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bernadino, Ca. , am in agreement of this demand. lot ~ We, the residents of the Belmont Equestrian Estates, are requesting the right to be able to erect across the openings of our "private equestrian accesses" as stated in our land title, full height private gated fences. We would like to do this by amending the CC&R's for tract 15915 in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, county of San Bemadino, Ca. I,~xVx~O~am in agreement of thi~ Signed lot / . · CITY OF ~ANCH© m,m~.~ONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEE ! 3 P~AR~N F~ILy ~U~ ~DO~ER)' R~O~ ~U6U~ I1, RECEI~~I~G N~: ~AID ~eUM~T W~ ~O~D~D ~ NO ~A~ D~ON, {4. T~ O~'S C~CAT~ OF T~CT MAP NO. I Sgl{ RE~, iN '~ H~Y A~ D~DICAT} TO ~B ~ O} RAN~o ~MON~ ~R P~C STO~ D~IN ~EM~ ~ ~OWN ON ~ ~ ~ VEHI~ ~O~31EO~ THROU~ THE P~ATE ~UE~N E~S ~ ~ 12 THROU~ ~7 IN~U3~ ~ 15. /. Pu~s~, .~e ~o~ o. ~e ~ o~ ~ ~. . ~ ~ ~R ~K HBR~A~ ~RT FOR~ SP~IFIC p~ A~ INdiAL PUR~. ~ ~O~ ON ~ MAP O~ ~ ~A~, AN ~T ~ T~ H~IN~ I~ ~O~ S~ PL~ AND INC~ (A~l ~ ~,)~ ~Y AND P~N A~ p~. · ' xN/B/r "Z) " George Bettors, 275 Canterbury Court, Upland, thanked everyone, especially Donald Granger, · assistance in processing the project. Imed Morris 200 South Palatino Drive, Alhambra, stated he has known the amhitect time and all of his product is good. He said he built two projects in Alhambra and the houses before they were finished. There were no additional public comments. Commissioner Tolstoy observed that the trail will be in ye ~ terrain. He asked if water bars will be put in the trail. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner uirement in the steeper graded sections. Chairman McNiel stated at the Design Review Committee level and it was virtually flawless. He thougl and the architect did a great job and it will be a good project. Motion: Moved by '1 seconded by Stewart to adopt the resolution approving Development Review DRCDR Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: ABS~.' NONE - carried B. TRACT 15915 - BELMONT EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - A request by Brynda Fryan as a representative of the Belmont Equestrian Estates to amend the CC&Rs for Tract 15915 to allow full height private gates across local feeder trails where they intersect public streets - APN: 1089-081-01 through 14 and 1089-071-01 through 22. Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and indicated a letter from a resident on Spencer Court had been received supporting the request to gate the trail. Chairman McNiel invited public comment. Brynda Fryan, 7055 Isle Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they have been trying to resolve the matter since last May. She said she researched how the City came up with a community trail system and spoke to a Phillip Martinez, who used to work between the Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, and Upland areas in the Planning Division. She stated he explained that 20 years ago Rancho Cucamonga's idea for the future was to establish a community area that would have a wholesome environment and allow equestrian privileges through the City via trails that would interconnect between the different divisions of the City. She indicated he said the main idea was to have certain areas with Iow density population and certain areas with high density population. She stated hers is the only tract on that side of Etiwanda Avenue that is Iow density with a ~ acre or more and all the rest of the homes around her area are high density with about 7,500 square foot lots. She indicated she told Mr. Martinez the City did not continue to incorporate an equestrian feel for the City with the smaller lots. She said Mr. Martinez commented that houses generate more taxes and the City turned Y2 acre lots into 1,4 acres lots because the need for taxes increases as communities become larger. She stated she understands that and she also understands how the City wants to have trails go through the City and she felt that is beautiful; however, she felt that her area does not allow for that to happen. Ms. Fryan said there are only 36 homes in their community that could possibly have horses and she had signatures from most of the homeowners in that community stating that they are not going to own horses. She commented that the residents feel Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 27, 2002 that leaving the feeder trails open allows for anyone to go up and down the trails including motorcyclists and vagrants and they had been told that the gates on the south side of their tract will be removed once the Rails-to-Trails trail is in place. She said that Mr. Martinez explained that about 20 years ago the Rails-to-Trails was going to try to bring the trolley car back in but that has now been outvoted. She commented their homes are worth between $500,000 to $750,000 and there has been graffiti. She acknowledged that the information given her by Mr. Le Count said there had not been any graffiti, but she maintained there has been a lot of graffiti on the walls. She said there has been a theft in the neighborhood and damage to the community trail. She reported she has walked some of the other feeder trails and in those cases the only way to access from Point A to Point B was by using the feeder trails but they did not allow any cam to use those trails. She said all of the trails for her tract have an actual drive approach which would easily allow car access thereby making it easy for someone to open the gate, drive down the trail, and steal from houses. She stated their trails begin and end with a full community trail on the eastern side, which allows equestrian users to traverse from Point A to Point B. She thought that makes their homes distinct. She indicated the homeowners feel there is no real reason for anyone other than homeowners to access their trails. She believed that gating off the trails would provide more secudty for themselves and their children. She said several neighbors commented that the City is more intent on the appearance of an equestrian look rather than actually fulfil ling what the equestrian dream was in the beginning. Ken Douglas, 6047 Indigo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the Fryans ara talking about a specific number of brand new houses. He felt the first person moving into a house should not be allowed to decide the history of what will happen on that house. He said that by putting gates on the horse trails, future owners could not have horses because the homes become non-horse property and are not horse friendly. He felt the issue of motorcycles on the trails is a City-wide issue and observed the gate approved by the City was designed specifically to address that problem because it has a step-through. He pointed out that cyclists would have to stop upon reaching the gate and lift their motorcycle over the step-through. With respect to ddveway approaches for the horse trails, he thought they were designed that way to allow access for feed trucks, veterinary trucks, or the homeowner's personal pick up truck to service the home property. He said the City allowed gate would also stop such use as well. He noted that the trails were designed for use by school children and pedestrians as well as for equestrian uses. He believed other housing tracts will be going around this housing tract in the future; therefore, they will not be the only horse property in the area. Carol Douglas, 6047 Indigo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she is the City liaison for the Alta Loma Riding Club. She said that if the City chooses to rule in favor of the Belmont Estates, it will be satisfying the wishes of a few while sacrificing the plans of the whole community. She observed that approving the request would necessitate changes to major City documents including the General Plan, Trails Implementation Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Development Code, and the Municipal Code. She believed they are trying to address a neighborhood security issue in a manner that will affect all residents in the City. She felt the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents have not used basic tools available to correct security issues. She stated the issue can and should be addressed by calling the Police to report crimes, calling the City's graffiti hotline for graffiti removal, and starting a Neighborhood Watch program to promote safety and security. She noted the residents have complained repeatedly of children doing mischief on their way to or from schools. She suggested the residents work with the administration of the local schools to resolve those problems. She thought they also should address parents when they can determine the parents of the children involved. She indicated she spoke with Dan Waters, a Crime Analyst in the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, and he said the crime statistics in the City do not show a higher crime rate in homes along horse trails. She stated that other homeowners in the equestrian area have occasionally experienced sim ilar problems but they have resolved them successfully through means other than erecting gates. She asked the City to encourage the residents to address their problems through the same resources available to everyone in the community. She observed that at the Trails Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 27, 2002 Committee Meeting, the residents spoke of the trails as being private easements. She stated they are dedicated trail easements that are designated as local feeder trails, also known as private feeder trails or private trail easements. She said they are designed for the use of residents in the entire tract, not just those homes adjacent to each easement. She noted the City's General Plan states that local feeder trails provide access to the rear of lots within the rural overlay, provide connections to regional and community trails, and also provide "logical riding loops within subdivisions." She said the easements are not isolated parcels, but are like pieces of a puzzle that combine with other pieces to make the whole City's trail system. She observed the gate that has been installed denies access to other residents within the tract and takes away the possibility of logical riding loops within the tract. She felt removal of the trail would damage the integrity of the system. She reported she discussed the issue with many residents in her own neighborhood including many residents who do not own horses. She said she found that the residents like to use the trails as they were intended and do not want them gated as they like the atmosphere the trails create. She stated they use the trails in a manner consistent with the Trails Implementation Plan, which states, "Local feeder trails are primarily intended for equestrian use although they are commonly used by homeowners for morning and evening walks and may also be used by children as a path to school." Ms. Douglas observed the City has a standard gate, Standard Engineering Plan 1008C. She asked that the standard gate be used if the Commission determines that a gate would solve the issue because it would allow the access intended for the trails. She observed that the City addressed the matter in 1988 when Thomas Morrow blocked off his trail easement. She said the court decided in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in Case No. RCV45178. She noted the case was appealed and the courts upheld the original decision. She asked that the City not put the wishes of a few residents over the rules and regulations of a whole community. She requested that the City deny the request. Carl Becker, 8586 Thoroughbred, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is equine liaison officer for the Sheriff's Department Citizen Patrol. He indicated they depend on use of the trails to patrol the back areas of houses. He said if they are denied access, they will not be able to properly patrol. He noted they could get into areas where vehicles cannot go and they provide a service to the community. Courtney Douglass, 6047 Indigo Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she is a member of the Alta Loma Riding Club and the President of the local Rancho Rebels 4H Club and is involved in a horse project offered by 4H. She said the horse project uses the City's trails for organized trail rides. She stated that people from other cities come to Rancho Cuc~monga to use the trails. She wanted to keep the trails open by using the City standard gate or some other compromise. There were no additional public comments. Commissioner Mannedno believed the item is a non-issue. He read an excerpt from the CC&Rs for the tract recorded on August 22, 2000, which indicated that each owner grants an easement to the public over the portion of their lot depicted on the recorded subdivision map and that owner is responsible to keep the trail easement in a safe and passable manner and prohibiting the construction of any structure within or across the trail easement including walls, fences, and gates. He stated that the CC&Rs were recorded two years ago and now the residents want to take the dedication back. He felt they should have considered that before buying the property. Commissioner Stewart stated that legal issue was at the core of what the Trails Committee argued. She wished the manner could be resolved in a harmonious manner satisfactory to everyone, but she did not think that was possible. She noted an alternative step-through gate design was offered, which was approved by the City and used successfully in other places. She was not sure why the Fryans do not want to use it and noted it was used in other portions of that tract. She felt it was a first step Jn trying to resolve the problems that the residents have indicated exist. She noted that there is no documentation of the problems and there are no calls for service on the Police logs. She Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 27, 2002 /¢2 said that if there are problems that are not being reported, then no one can help. She said there are community oriented policing projects to address problems. She felt the request is a legal issue and the City should not change the different plans that are unique to the City and have laid the foundation. She said the change would impact 130,000 other citizens and she did not feel it should be done. Chairman McNiel stated he is not a "horse" person, but he lives in an equestrian community and he supports the equestrian trails that help define the community. He felt approving this request would be the first step in the demise of what the City has put together to make it an open an acceptance oriented community. He asked what action was needed by the Planning Commission. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission had before it a recommendation from the Trails Committee. He indicated the Fryans originally approached the City Council as a result of Code Enfomement action on their property and the City Council asked that staff work with the Fryans in an attempt to address the issue. He said the matter could not be resolved and the Fryans went back to the City Council, at which time the Council directed the issue be reviewed by the Trails Committee and the Planning Commission prior to going back to City Council. He indicated that minute action of the Commission's recommendation would be forwarded to the City Council. Commissioner Tolstoy noted that the Trails Committee listened to several hours of testimony, deliberated, and unanimously decided to recommend denial of the request. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Stewart, to concur with the Trails Committee in recommending denial of the request to allow full height private gates across local feeder trails where they intersect public streets. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded C. CONSIDERATION Of SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT- CHAF ASSOCIATES - A request to initiate an amendment to allow Public Storage as a within Planning Area VIII of the Empire Lakes project. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel asked if a project has been proposed with respect site being used. Mr. Coleman responded there is a developer interested in age facility on a portion of Planning Area VIII. Chairman McNiel invited public comment. Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, felt the ~ i~ence for the nearby apartment projects. He noted his client will be submitting a Plan Amendment concurrent with an application for a public storage facility that will ~ City's requirements with respect to design and the Empire Lakes area. He said to answer any questions. Chuck ~perties, 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, #440, Ontado, noted that in was a master plan creating 9 separate lots ranging from 1 ~/2 acres to 31/2 )king 6th Street to 5th Street and Milliken Avenue. He observed that all Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 27, 2002 PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered toprotest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered toprotest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding home trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. 0 x'w 7 o-~,~g_ / PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmom Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived fxom our existing trail system. C l~ .ql7 5o PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding home trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change~ s allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derive~ ~om our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered toprotest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. ]/ PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. ~e~bel~e in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail syst ? PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered toprotest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing roles regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered toprotest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION Tl~e signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. (Please sign legibly:) (Please print your address:) PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. PETITION Tl~e signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of the Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to ,gate their equestrian trail easements. Those signing this petition support our City's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. (Please sign legibly:) (Please print your address:) PETITION The signatures presented below have been gathered to protest the request of th~ Belmont Equestrian Estate residents to change their CC&R's allowing them to.,gate their equestrian trail easements. Those sig.ning this petition support our Ci~ty's existing rules regarding horse trails as set forth in our General Plan, the Trails Implementation Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. We believe in the benefit and pleasure derived from our existing trail system. ly:) (Please print your address:) ~:] al/ri ~,,~-/ ?~ t~-~''-, I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FFiOM: Ke¥in McArOle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner DATE: April 17, 2002 SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation · facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the P'ark Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A, PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Ralph M. Lewis Park: · The maintenance period is proceeding well· Lewis is anticipating a grand opening celebration on May 11. Heritage Park: · Construction of the tot lot is proceeding well. The play equipment is being installed, followed by the resilient surfacing material. Barring inclement weather that would slow construction, it is anticipated that the tot lot will be completed by the end of April. Rancho Etiwanda Park: · Construction of the park is underway. The sewer and storm drain system have been installed and the contractor is starting construction of the restroom building. B, COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE CITY COUNCIL PARKS, REC[~EATION FACIUTIES AND COMMUNI~' SERVICES UPDATE APRIL ] 7, 2002 Seniors: · Senior Citizens Fine Art Show, Saturday, April 6.. Fifty-four (54) entries were received for the show and over 200 community members visited the Center to view the outstanding artwork. · Sprinq Flin.q, Thursday, April 18, 10:00 a.m. Come to the Senior Center and help celebrate the annual spring event with musical entertainment, refreshments and games. An Easter Bonnet Parade will follow. This event is co-sponsored with the V.I.P. Club. · The V.I.P. Club will hold their annual Parking Lot Sale at the Senior Center on Saturday, April 27, 2002, from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Lots of bargains and hidden treasures can be found. This is a fund raising event for the V.I.P. Club. Come out and support it. · Cinco de May Celebration, Friday, May 3, 2002. Come and enjoy a morning of Mexican fun. Traditional refreshments will be served. Entertainment will be provided by dancers from a local elementary school as well as Mexican singers. · Mother's / Grandmother's Day Brunch, Saturday, May 11th, 11:00 a.m. For ail the Moms and Grandmothers alone on Mother's Day, come join the Senior Center for a special brunch, and be honored on this occasion. A light brunch will be served and entertainment will be provided. Pre-registration required. · Senior Advisory Committe~ will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, April 22nd, 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Human Services: · Fibromyalqia Workshop - The Arthritis Foundation will offer a 7-week self-help course for people with Fibromyalgia. The class is designed to teach people how to take a more active role in their health care. This course will offer information on pain control, relaxation, exercise, fatigue and depression. Sessions will be held from April 2nd through May 14, 2002. There is a $15.00 material fee. Registration is required. · Personal Safety/Self-Defense Class for Seniors, April 2 and 9, 2002, 10:00 a.m. Project Sister Sexual Assault Crisis and Prevention Services is offering a safety awareness class to both male and female seniors. Participants will learn how to develop assertiveness skills, learn self- defense moves/techniques and reduce the risk for becoming a victim of crime. Registration is required. · Mana.qin.q Your Health, April 5t~ to May 31, 2002. The San Bernardino County Public Health nurses will present a free six-week workshop on Managing Your Health. They will go over information regarding muscle relaxation, identifying health problems and goal setting. Registration is required. The Doctor Is In - Dr. Harvey Cohen, M.D. will provide a free lecture on Uncontrolled Diabetes and the Insulin Pump. May 21, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. Registration is required. -2- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FAClUTIES AND COMMUNI1Y SERVICES UPDATE APRIL 17, 2002 Trips and Tours: · California Strawberry Festival, May 18, 2002. The delicious heart-shaped fruit of Oxnard is ripe and the 19t~ Annual California Strawberry Festival is ready to tempt the taste buds of Southern Californians everywhere. One of the nation's most popular weekend celebrations pays tasty tribute to the luscious fruit garnered from the City's bountiful 6,600 berry acres. Presented by the California Strawberry Festival Committee, the multi-faceted event serves up a menu of delectable strawberry delights from strawberry pizza and strawberry shortcake to chocolate dipped strawberries and more. The event also includes non-stop entertainment and participatory activities for berry lovers of all ages. · Downtown Disney, June 8, 2002. We'll get you there then you're on your own to enjoy one of Disney's newest attractions. Tucked between Disneyland and California Adventure, Downtown Disney offers fabulous food, great entertainment and shops galore featuring the "World of Disney" store; the second largest collection of Disney merchandise. · Catalina, August 17, 2002. Come to Southern California's Island paradise! After a short cruise to the island you have the opportunity to stroll around at your leisure. Enjoy shopping, dining, snorkeling and a variety of tours. · Solvanq, September 21, 2002. Danish Days in Solvang! Step into this quaint Danish village and enjoy all the sights, sounds and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at your leisure to explore the Scandinavian import shops and bakeries of Solvang. Volunteer Services: · The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usage for the month of February and year to date. "MONTH: February 2002 YEAR TO DATE # of # of Hours $ Value # of # of Hours $ Value Volunteers Volunteers Administration 5 15 $210 10 30 $420 Sports 426 3,109 $43,526 856 5,835 $81,690 Senior and 55 248 $3,472 112 504 $7,056 Human Services Special 7 14 $196 14 28 $392 Events Youth 66 3,135 $43,890 113 3,351 $46,914 Pro~lrams Total 559 6,521 $91,294 1,105 9,748 $136,472 *Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour. Teens: · Teen Center - During the month of March 2002, 720 teens participated in activities at the -3- CI1Y COUNCIL PARKS, r~ECREATION FACILI:rlES AND COMMUNIW SD?VICES UPDATE APRIL 17, 2002 Teen Center. Due to the spring break holiday, we anticipate that during the month of April this number will increase to over 800 youngsters. · The Teen Center Homework Room is being used everyday. Approximately 250 youngsters have used the computers in the room to complete their homework. Staff is currently developing a tutoring program to assist the teens. Staff feels this type of assistance will be well received by the teens. · The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC), TRAC's twice-monthly babysitting service Night on the Town is going very strong and is usually at capacity. This program continues to grow in popularity and attendance. During the month of Mamh, 90 children were taken care by our young TRAC volunteers. TRAC volunteers participated at our Annual Kids Fest on Saturday, March 30th. Over 15 TRAC youngsters assisted staff in selling hot dogs, cotton candy, popcorn and sodas to over 3,000 community members at the event. · The Teen Workshop Series - Future workshops include: Parent/Teen Communication Workshop that is scheduled for April 27, 2002. Our annual Career Expo held on March 31st had over 2,000 youth in attendance. For the first time high school teachers offered extra credit for youngsters who attended the Career Expo. · The Spruce Park Skate Facility is being used on a daily basis, weather permitting. Staff has been making appearances at the skate facility on a weekly basis checking to ensure that safety equipment is being worn by the youngsters using the facility. Since staff has been visiting the skate facility on a regular basis and giving out free chips or sodas to youngsters wearing the proper skate gear, staff is noticing more youth wearing the appropriate safety gear while skating. With an extra hour of daylight beginning in early April we anticipate that our usage figures will increase over the nearly 5,000 youngsters that used the facility in April. Our next skate park demonstration and safety clinic will be held on Saturday, May 11th. The event will run from 11:00 a.m. until 1:30 p.m. We anticipate that over 800 youngsters and their families will attend the event. A.J. Jackson will serve as the Master of Ceremony and skaters Willy Santos, Daniel Hany and Brian Patch will pedorm. Join us for an awesome display of tricks and talent from professional and amateur skate teams. Youth Activities: · Playschool - Enrollment is close to 600 children. Staff is preparing for the summer version of Playschool, Play Camp. · The Mobile Recreation Program Fun on the Run is going strong. The program served over 500 youth for the month during March. ~ ~ 6th the Mobile Recreation Unit visited the Lewis Homes Evergreen Apartment Complex. Nearly 30 youngsters participated in fun activities. The Unit will continue to visit the Complex on the first Saturday of each month. On April 30th staff will be celebrating the Mobile Recreation program's first anniversary at the -4- /¢7 CiTY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACIU1]ES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE APRIL 17, 2002 Old Town Park site visit. Special activities and give-a-way items will be a part of the celebration. The schedule for the Mobile Recreation Unit continues as follows: through the end of the school year - Monday - Bear Gulch Park, Tuesday - Old Town Park, Wednesday - Hermosa Park, Thursday - Mountain View Park, Friday - Windrows Park. Youth Events: · Over 3,000 community members attended our spring event, Kids Fest on March 30t~ at Red Hill Park. It was a great event just to celebrate being a kid! Youngsters and their parents enjoyed the best fun zone around with a mega slide, moon bouncers, game booths, hands-on-crafts, obstacle courses, visits from Peter Cottontail and free bags of candy for thb youngsters. Grants: · The Teen Connection program continues to operate on the local high school campuses. Staff is being well received on campus by the students, teachers and administrators. The program operates during school lunch hours on the following days: Tuesdays - Etiwanda High School; Wednesdays - Rancho Cucamonga High School; and Thursdays - Alta Loma High School. · Youth Enrichment Services (YES) - Staff has submitted a Request Funding Proposal (RFP) to the Children and Families Commission for San Bernardino County for continued funding for the next two years (July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2004) for our highly successful YES program. New to this proposal, is a collaboration with the Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA, to offer a new element to the YES Program, a monthly Prime Time Families First activity that will be available to participants from the Y's child care program. Through a collaborative effort with the Commission and a number of other agencies the YES Program will be participating in a Health and Safety Fair at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center on Saturday April 20, 2002, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Families will be able to come to this event and learn everything there is to know about young children, ages 0 to 5 and find out what services/programs are available in the community to assist them. · California Children and Families Commission - Staff is in the process of preparing a grant proposal to the Commission in response to an RFP for a community-based organization grant program that will raise general awareness and educate new and expectant parents and caregivers of children prenatal to age 5 about how they can make the most of a child's early years. Contract Classes: · Contract classes started up for spring on April 1, 2002. Eight new classes for are being offered: Scrape Booking for youngsters and adults, Card Making for Busy Moms, Creative Balloon Decorating, Balloon Animals, Stamp Therapy, Film and TV Acting Workshop and Tae Kwon Do a self defense class. -5- Ci1Y COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACIUTIES AND COMMUNI1Y SERVICES UPDATE APRIL '] 7, 2002 Youth Sports: · The Sports Advisory Committee met on April 11, 2002. Field request materials for fall/winter 2002 (August 1 through January 31,2003) were due at this meeting. · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 360 3-5/boys & girls 36 Roller Hockey 175 6-15/boys & girls N/A Basketball Camp 60 6-12/boys & girls N/A Track and Field Program 120 6-13/boys & girls N/A Track and Field Meet 175 6-15/boys & girls N/A Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit organized youth sport lea.ques. For the reporting period, 10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 377,534 participants and spectators enjoying our parks. RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 1,046 Youth Basketball 1,059 Adult Racquetball 433 Youth Racquetball 59 Adult Wallyball 14 Youth Wallyball 1 Adult Volleyball 49 Youth Volleyball 21 Jazzercise N/A · The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: I Activity # Participants Age/Gende~ # Teams Basketball- Full Court 80 Adult/Males 8 Basketball 3-on-3 30 Adult/Males 6 Adult Racquetball 16 Adult/Males N/A -6- CI~Y COUNCIL PAEKS, r~EC[~EATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SE[~VICES UPDATE APRIL '17, 2002 Adult Sports: · Thirty-three adult males participated in tennis lea.ques during the reporting period. · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for men and women for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,640 165 Male/Female Flag Football 80 8 Male Soccer 640 40 Male/Female · Three adult softball tournament are scheduled for the month of April 2002 and four are scheduled for the month of May, 2002, (3 adult and one youth) at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex. Community Wide Special Events: · Staff is busy gearing up for our sprinqtime special events that are just around the corner. Our first community wide special event of the year is Cinco de Mayo that is co-sponsored with Northtown Housing and Development Corporation. This event will be held on May 4th from 12- noon until 5:00 p.m. at Old Town Park. The event will be filled with entertaining performances, great food and lots of fun for the whole family. Cultural and Performing Arts: · Sprinq Production - The Sound of Music- The Community theatre production of The Sound of Music presented at Alta Loma High School opened on April 12th with an evening performance. Shows will continue on April 13, 14, 19, 20 & 21. Parents and volunteers participated by assisting with program ad sales, production photos, t-shirt creation and sales, stage crew, backstage supervision and concession sales. The show is in cooperation with the Alta Loma High School. Professional sets and costumes will be rented from the Theatre Company in Upland. The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and SBC Pacific Bell are both sponsors of this wonderful children's production. We have contracted with Charter Media for a series of 30-second commercials on cable TV during the run and the week prior to The Sound of Music production. The commercial will be generic in content, featuring actors and directors from the current show. This format will be used for future performing arts events and productions. · Summer Production: The Pa~ama Game- The summer production has now been selected. The classic 1954 Broadway musical The Pajama Game will be the City's 3rd community theatre production and will once again feature a cast of youth ranging in age from 8 -20. The artistic staff from The Sound of Music, Barbara Hinrichsen and Don Cloud, have agreed to direct the summer musical, with both having experience directing The Pajama Game with youth performers in the past. The show is slated to be presented at the Alta Loma High School -7- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACIUTIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE APRIL 17, 2002 Theater on the two weekends from July 26th through August 4, 2002. Auditions will be held June 1st and 2nd, Performing Arts Classes: · The sprin.q contract class session began on April 1st and offers the ongoing programs: Talent Connection and Vocal Expression and Performance. All classes are offered at Lions West Community Center. New classes and workshops in the pedorming and visual arts are expected to be added to the summer roster of classes. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides information on park reservations for the month of March 2002: Shelter Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed Rentals Red Hill 1,807 39 45 164 Community Park Heritage Community 152 4 4 16 Park Hermosa Park 350 12 13 54 Coyote Canyon Park 270 8 9 31 Civic Center 0 0 0 0 Courtyard* Amphitheater 1,400 2 2 7 Equestrian Center 170 4 4 22 Total 4,149 69 77 294 *No rentals due to scheduled construction. Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usa.qe for the month of April 2002 is shown in the table below. Group Date Event~l'ime Frame Alta Loma Riding Club April 4~n Board Meeting/7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. 4-H Club April 13~h Horsemastership Testing/7:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m. 4-H Club April 15m General MeetingP':00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club April 16m General Meeting/6:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club April 21st Schooling Show/8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. Citizen's Patrol April 27n Sensitivity Training/8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Park and Recreation Commission: · At the Commission's regular April 18, 2002, meeting the following items will be discussed/acted upon: >. Senior Advisory Committee update. -8- CiTY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACIUTES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE APRIL 17, 2002 Sports Advisory Committee update. Status on legislative efforts for the Senior Center Project. Update on proposed Performing Arts Center. Discussion regarding potential future skate facilities within the community. Approval of request to cancel May 27th Senior Advisory Committee meeting due to the Memorial Day holiday. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Foundation's April 9, 2002 regular meeting: > Consideration of a request for funding from the Etiwanda Historical Society. > Update on the proposal for the Cultural Arts Center. > Board Development, Strategic Planning and Fund Raising Development Process - Session #1 Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · The following activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period: > Abundant Living Family Chumh - Easter Services - Epicenter Stadium - March 30 and 31,2002. · Staff is working with the following organizations for future/tentative bookings at the Epicenter: American Cancer Society - Relay for Life - Epicenter Adult Sports Complex Soccer Fields - April 20 and 21,2002. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes - Post Game Friendship Rally- Epicenter Stadium - May 5, 2002. Rancho Cucamonga ACE Softball - Closing Ceremonies- Epicenter Stadium - June 1,2002. Daily Bulletin - Inland Valley All Stars Game - Epicenter Stadium - June 3 and 4, 2002. > Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremonies - Epicenter Stadium - June 12, 2002. > Mt. High Entertainment -Concert Series - Epicenter Stadium - spring/summer 2002 (Tentative). ~rd~ ~r~ Kevh, Comr~ unity Services Director I:l¢OMMS£R~lOoun¢il&Board$1CityCoun¢il[$taffRoporf$l~OO£1updat~. 17.0£.doc -9- T H C I I Y 0 V l~AN ClIO CUCAM ONGA SmffRepo TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SISTER CITIES TASK FORCE Back.qround The City Council has expressed an interest in establishing a sister city relationship. To facilitate that, a Sister Cites Task Force, composed of Mayor Pro Tern Diane Williams, and Council Member Bob Dutton, was formed, and solve problems together through reciprocal cultural, educational, municipal, business, professional and technical exchanges and projects. The Rancho Cucamonga Task Force ("Task Force"), over time, has been given myriad materials on sister cities including basic information on sister cities (purpose, goal, formation, funding, etc.) and information on specific cities in Australia, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, and China. After studying the information provided to them over the months, the Task Force requested staff to organize a community meeting to determine the community's interest/support if the City were to create a Sister Cities Program. One of the major tenets of having a sister city relationship is community support. In our research of cities that have sister cities, we found that the sister city relationships were run by community groups/associations. The cities played an administrative role, and to serve as the formal entity/infrastructure to allow the formation of a sister city relationship. City officials also serve in ceremonial roles (e.g. presenting plaques at council meetings, holding receptions, etc.). The community is the real backbone of running a sister city program. In addition, they must be willing to commit time, talent, and resources, including financial, to develop long-term relationships with their foreign counterparts. The cities we polled budgeted very small amounts of money for their sister city programs (e.g. $2,000-3,000 range). The community groups/organizations/agencies were invited to a meeting on April 2® to gauge their interest in a sister city program and are listed on the following page. The Page 2 April 17, 2002 CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SISTER CITIES TASK FORCE groups that participated are underlined, while those that called or expressed interest in the meeting, but were unable to attend, have an asterisk. 1. Community Foundation 2. Etiwanda Historical Society 3. YMCA* 4. Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce* 5. Alta Loma School District* 6. Central School District* 7. CucamonRa School District 8. Etiwanda School District 9. Charley Joint Union High School District* 10. Kiwanis of Rancho Cucamonga* 11.Community Lions Club* 12. Rancho Cucamonga Woman's Club 13. Rancho Grande Kiwanis 14. Rotary Club of Rancho CucamonRa 15. Soroptimist International of Baldy View 16.Sunset Rotary Club 17.Abundant Living Family Church 18. Hillside Community Church 19.Saint Peter & Paul Catholic Church In addition, a representative from Chaffey Community College, as well as Task Force Member Bob Dutton, attended the meeting. Those in attendance at the community meeting were briefed on sister cities in general and what our City has done to date including the formation of the Sister Cities Task Force and research into cities in Australia, Canada, China, Mexico, and New Zealand. The following points summarize the input we received from the meeting: · Those in attendance appeared very supportive of the concept of a Sister City Program. · The Sister City Program should be mutually beneficial to both cities. · The Sister City Program should broaden our cultural awareness. · The Sister City Program appeared to be consistent with the goals, beliefs, or programs of some of the groups present at the meeting (e.g. Chaffey College has a cultural diversity program). · The Sister City Program should provide fulfillment to those who participate in both cities which in turn will make Rancho Cucamonga a better community. The Page 3 April 17, 2002 CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SISTER CITIES TASK FORCE fulfillment would be the "life change" in people who see the results of their efforts to help those in a foreign city. · There was generally consensus among the group that the countries the City should focus on include: Australia, New Zealand, and Mexico. One representative felt that the City should focus solely on Mexico. A representative from Central School District, who was unable to attend the meeting, expressed her interest in China. · All of those in attendance indicated their willingness to participate and attend any future community meetings. The representatives were encouraged to report back to their boards, leaders, etc. to confirm their willingness to participate. · There was consensus among the group that the focus of any Sister City Program should not focus on only one interest, but instead several (e.g. economic, academic, spiritual, cultural, etc.) · The participants were asked to report back to us if their respective organizations have any current relationships with foreign cities (e.g. foreign cities that may have a Rotary or Kiwanis Club, or some other social or economic relationship). The community information was presented to the Task Force at their April 10, 2002 meeting along with some additional research including the identification of more cities in Mexico for potential sister city relationships. Recommendation The Task Force recommends that the City Council form an ad hoc group, as recommended by Sister Cities International, to proceed to more involved levels of research, solidify community support/commitment; and, to make a recommendation based on their research to the City Council at a future date. The research and work of the ad hoc group would include making recommendations to the City Council on: identifying the overall program objectives; selecting a sister city; incorporating the program; identifying building membership; designing a budget; and generating publicity. The Task Force further recommends using the community groups previously invited to the April 2nd meeting as the basis for that ad hoc group. In addition, it is being recommended that Chaffey Community College, Shepherd of the Hills Church, and Task Force Members Dutton and Williams be included in the group. Staff was contacted about 6 months ago by a Dr. Houston who expressed a great interest in sister cities (she has been involved in San Bernardino's sister city program and attended the Sister Cities Conference last year). It is also recommended that Dr. Houston and other select individuals/groups, as deemed appropriate by the City Council, be invited to participate in the ad hoc group.