Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002/06/05 - Agenda Packet
OITY O'F RANCH© G C AM ON GA Rancho Cucar0onga OA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: IsT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. June 5,2002 A.qency, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ............................... Member Grace Curatalo ......................... Member Bob Dutton .............................. Member Jack Lam .........................City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo Dutton__, and Williams__ B.~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamations for the Police Department's Exceptional Services Award Winners. 2. Presentation of Proclamations in recognition of volunteers Betty Linker and Pauline Dean for winning the California Park & Recreation Society District XI Layman Award. 3. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Rancho Cucamonga High School Percussion Ensemble for their Success at the 2002 Winter Guard International Championships. 4. Presentation of Proclamations to youngsters representing schools throughout Rancho Cucamonga in gratitude for their support of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Telethon 2002 and recognizing the participants in this year's Junior Trivia Challenge. 5. Presentation of Proclamations to the co-hosts of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Telethon. C.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. 1. Presentation by Megan Daniels and Katie Hill on their Silver Award Bridge Project for a local park. City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register 5/8/02 through 5/28/02 and Payroll 2 ending 5/9/02 and 5/23/02 for the total amount of $4,414,457.88. 2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 39 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure I, Account No. 11763035850/1022170 and AB 2928 Traffic Congestion Relief, Account Number 11823035650/1022182. RESOLUTION NO. 02-170 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 3. Approval to reject all bids received for the in-roadway warning lights at 46 19th Street (SR30) and Jasper Street as non-responsive to the needs of the City and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for new bids for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th Street and Jasper Street. RESOLUTION NO. 02-171 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHT SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET, FEDERAL AID PROJECT STPLHSR-5420(007)" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval of Resolution to apply for grant funds for the Per Capita 54 Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEtGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 5. Approval of Resolution to apply for grant funds for the Roberti-Z'berg- 57 Harris Urban Open Space Recreation program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. RESOLUTION NO. 02-173 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 6. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 61 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 72 for Tract 13527, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Cervantes Place submitted by General Electric Capital Corporation and Mastercraft- Cucamonga II, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 02-174 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 13527, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-175 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 13527 City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 4 7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 75 Tract Map No. 16263 (Terra Vista Parkway and EIlena West), located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Ellena West, submitted by K B Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 02-176 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY (TERRA VISTA PARKSNAY AND ELLENA WEST) FOR TRACT MAP NO. 16263 8. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement (CO 02-043) for installation of a 81 portion of a master planned storm drain facility in connection with development of Tract 14459 located at Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to London Avenue, submitted by Alta Loma I and II, Joint Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 02-177 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT OF A PORTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN INSTALLED iN LEMON AVENUE 9. Authorization to negotiate a contract for the Community Trail Fencing 86 and PCC Curb along Summit Trail at the south side of Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road west of Beryl Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 11103165650/1087110-0. 10. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 88 execution of the Contract in the amount of $539,203.61 ($490,185.10 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, California Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc. (CO 02-044) for the construction of the Local Street Rehabilitation-Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax 2105/Proposition 111 Funds, Account No. 11703035650/1022176-0, and appropriate $245,000.00 from Measure I fund balance, Acct. No. 11763035650/1022176-0 for the construction of said project. 11. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the 92 execution of a contract in the amount of $68,700.00 (plus a 10% contingency of $6,870.00) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Tobin Construction of Alta Loma (CO 02-045) from Accounts 1120305- 5650 and 1120305-5602 and authorize an additional appropriation of $47,520.00 from Fund 1120305-5602 for the park trash enclosures. City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 5 12. Approval of CCWD Lease Agreement (CO 02-046) for the utilization of 94 existing power pole located on Hydro Plant at Reservoir 6 and the Royer-Nesbit Water Treatment Plant for local radio communications equipment installation. 13. Approval to award a contract to Conrad Business Services, Inc. (CO 02- 101 047) in the amount of $38,080 to perform an inventory and valuation of the City's infrastructure assets in accordance with the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 34 to be funded by the Capital Reserve Fund account number 1025001- 5300. 14. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the 132 execution of the Contract in the amount of $251,900.00 ($229,000.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Nature Tech Landscaping, Inc. (CO 02-048) for the construction of the Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and Hellman Avenue from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard Landscape Improvements, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 11103165650/1320110-0 and Account No. 11103165650/1319110-0. 15. Approval of a License Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Associated Governments 136 (SANBAG) (CO 02-049) for the placement of fiber optic conduit in th Hermosa Ave. under the Metrolink tracks, located nodh of 8 Street at SCRRA Mile Post 40.60. RESOLUTION NO. 02-178 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT IN HERMOSA AVENUE UNDER THE METROLINK TRACKS, LOCATED NORTH OF 8TM STREET AT SCRRA MILE POST 40.60 16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 139 execution of the contract in the amount of $348,627.40 ($316,934.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., (CO 02-050) for the construction of the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1153176-0. 17. Approval of a Cooperation Agreement with the County of San 142 Bernardino for participation in the County's Home Consortium (CO 02- 051). City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 6 18. Approval of an Agreement for Replacement of Overhead with 149 Underground Distribution Facilities between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Southern California Edison Company (CO 02-052) for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements from 350 feet south of 8th Street to north of the Metrolink Railroad Tracks north of 8th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 02-179 151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES ALONG HERMOSA AVENUE AND 8TM STREET 19. Approval to renew a five-year Lease Agreement with the Upland 152 Assistance League for use of their parking lot for Senior Center parking (CO 97-025).. 20. Approval of an agreement representing a partnership between Rancho 159 Cucamonga Public Library and various school districts in support of library services to youngsters (CO 02-053). 21. Approval of a Resolution certifying documents needed to accompany 160 grant application for the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 and approving School District agreements in support thereof. RESOLUTION NO. 02-186 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI.L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS, AND PUBLIC LIBRARY OPERATION 22. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 163 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for CUP 99-49, submitted by Evergreen Devco, Inc., located oh the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Drive. RESOLUTION NO. 02-180 165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-49 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 7 23. Approval to accept street Improvements, release the Faithful 166 Performance Bond (No. SA3911), accept a Maintenance Bond (No. SA3846), and file a Notice of Completion for said Improvements, and retain the Faithful Performance Bond (No. SA3913) provided for construction of a future bus bay for DR 00-31, submitted by Jefferson at Empire Lakes, LP, located on the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 02-181 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-31, EXCLUDING THE FUTURE BUS BAY, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond 170 as a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 00-59, submitted by Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, located on the southeast corner of Eight Street and Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 02-182 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-59 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 173 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 00-73, submitted by Paragon Rochester, LLC, located on Charles Smith Avenue, from south of Sixth Street to terminus of Rochester Court. RESOLUTION NO. 02-183 175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-73 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 26. Approval to accept the installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at Various Locations, Contract No. 01-084 as complete, retain the Performance 176 Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $199,970.85. City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 8 RESOLUTION NO. 02-184 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 01- 084 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval to accept the Heritage Park Tot Lot Renovation project, 179 Contract No. 01-083 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $553,629.76. RESOLUTION NO. 02-185 '181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 01-083 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E.~. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title, Any item can be removed for discussion. NO Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED '182 GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA (CONTINUED FROM MAY '15, 2002) City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 9 RESOLUTION NO. 02-061 184 & 186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLANNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 02-062 188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT 2. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 - CITY 189 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM -APNs: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35 ORDINANCE NO. 682 (first reading) 221 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002- 00231 TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35 City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 10 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items Submitted. I-I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS AND 224 APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,000 FROM FUND 1110316-5650 FOR THE ANNUAL CHURCH OF THE LATTER- DAY SAINTS VOLUNTEER PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON LEMON AVENUE, BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND BERYL STREET, AND AUTHORIZE D & K CONCRETE AND SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS AS SOLE SOURCE PROVIDERS OF CONCRETE AND WASHED STONE, RESPECTIVELY I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) 2. APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF MOBILE HOME ACCORD WITH 225 SYCAMORE VILLA (CO 92-014) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K._:. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda June 5, 2002 11 L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 30, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183032 5/8/2002 A AND K 30 M1N PHOTO LAB INC 4~83 AP - 00183032 5/8/2002 A AND K 30 M1N PHOTO LAB INC 6.01 AP - 00183032 5/8/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB [NC 29.89 AP - 00! 83033 5/8/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO [NC 50.93 AP - 00183034 5/8/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 32.70 AP - 00183034 5/8/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 56.57 AP - 00183034 5/8/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 292.33 AP - 00183034 5/8/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 13.62 AP - 00183035 5/8/2002 ABLAC 294.06 AP - 00183036 5/8/2002 ABLETRONICS 74.94 AP - 00183036 5/8/2002 ABLETRONICS 7.33 AP - 00183037 5/8/2002 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH 2,500.00 AP - 00183037 5/8/2002 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH 52.01 AP - 00183038 5/8/2002 ACOSTA, MICHAEL 45.00 AP - 00183039 5/8/2002 ADAMS, DAVID 57.00 AP - 00183040 5/8/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00 AP - 00183041 5/8/2002 ADT SECURITY SERVICES [NC 297.51 AP - 00183041 5/8/2002 ADT SECURITY SERVICES [NC 160.00 AP - 00183041 5/8/2002 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 297.51 AP - 00183042 5/8/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 428.65 AP - 00183042 5/8/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 41.60 AP - 00183042 5/8/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 470.25 AP - 00183043 5/8/2002 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 38,729.68 AP - 00183044 5/8/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 164.96 AP - 00183045 5/8/2002 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 1,917.95 AP - 00183046 5/8/2002 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 56.57 AP - 00183047 5/8/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 656.67 AP - 00183048 5/8/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 171.00 AP - 00183049 5/8/2002 APPLIED CONCEPTS 2,525.03 AP- 00183050 5/8/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 325.10 AP - 00183051 5/8/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1,322.00 AP - 00183052 5/8/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 195.33 AP ~ 00183053 5/8/2002 BALLOONS TO GO 107.25 AP - 00183054 5/8/2002 BISHOP, AARON 65.45 AP - 00183055 5/8/2002 BLUNK, LAURIE 160.75 AP - 00183056 5/8/2002 BOWERY, ROBERT 110.76 AP - 00183057 5/8/2002 BUTLER JR, EMANUEL 200.00 AP - 00183058 5/8/2002 CAFE JUSTICE 82.75 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 866.03 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 883.35 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 1,280.08 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 732.52 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 783.70 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 444.12 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 1,332.81 AP - 00183059 5/8/2002 CALSENSE 447.16 AP - 00183060 5/8/2002 CASCADDEN, JOHN 25.00 AP - 00183061 5/8/2002 CCPOA 30.00 AP - 00183062 5/8/2002 CEDILLO, CARLOS 45.00 AP - 00183063 5/8/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 252.07 AP - 00183064 5/8/2002 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS 5,739.50 AP - 00183065 5/8/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 21.55 AP - 00183066 5/8/2002 CHANNING BETE COMPANY [NC 345.88 AP - 00183067 5/8/2002 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 48.76 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183068 5/8/2002 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 15.28 AP - 00183069 5/8/2002 CHURCH, PHYLLIS 4,196.00 AP - 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC 51.11 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC 99.72 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 148.27 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 25.99 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC -3.24 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC -2.29 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC -3.24 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 3.88 AP 00183070 5/8/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC 99.72 AP 00183071 5/8/2002 COAST RECREATION 1NC 200.00 AP 00183071 5/8/2002 COAST RECREATION INC 333.44 AP 00183071 5/8/2002 COAST RECREATION INC 400.00 AP 00183072 5/8/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 199.50 AP 00183073 5/8/2002 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES 7,163.00 AP 00183074 5/8/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP 00183075 5/8/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,443.22 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 365.34 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 402.71 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 197.53 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 351.70 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,035.67 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 369.86 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,734.58 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 5,256.80 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 141.89 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 344.92 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 56.81 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 110.76 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 122.91 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.23 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 18.40 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 393.40 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 295.31 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 784.24 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 383.27 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 236.17 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 352.66 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 100.70 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.94 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 137.29 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.80 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 228.21 AP - 00183077. 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 307.70 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 322.18 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 148.38 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 120.56 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.38 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 58.20 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 98.70 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 49.08 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.07 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 05/28/; Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 167.55 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 175.54 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 29.90 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 477.35 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 614.48 AP 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 208.46 AP - 00183077 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 827.61 AP - 00183078 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 840.00 AP - 00183078 5/8/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 910.00 AP - 00183079 5/8/2002 CURATALO, GRACE 100.00 AP - 00183080 5/8/2002 D AND B PROPERTIES LTD 93.19 AP - 00183081 5/8/2002 D AND B VISIONS 780.00 AP - 00183082 5/8/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 161.63 AP - 00183082 5/8/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 518.28 AP - 00183082 5/8/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 635.72 AP - 00183083 5/8/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 430.00 AP - 00183084 5/8/2002 DEMKE, SANDRA 60.00 AP - 00183084 5/8/2002 DEMKE, SANDRA 55.00 AP - 00183085 5/8/2002 DICK, ERIC 330.00 AP - 00183086 5/8/2002 DINGEY THE CLOWN AND FRIENDS 190.00 AP - 00183087 5/8/2002 ELEVEN WESTERN BUILDERS 1,000.00 AP - 00183088 5/8/2002 ESKENAZI, MOISES 60.00 AP - 00183088 5/8/2002 ESKENAZI, MOISES 50.00 AP - 00183089 5/8/2002 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00183090 5/8/2002 FERGUSON CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 AP ~ 00183091 5/8/2002 FERRIN, KELLY 500.00 AP - 00183092 5/8/2002 FILARSKY AND WATT 2,040.00 AP - 00183093 5/8/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 434.70 AP - 00183093 5/8/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP - 00183093 5/8/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 714.00 AP - 00183093 5/8/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP - 00183093 5/8/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 234.00 AP - 00183094 5/8/2002 FITCH, RON 54.00 AP - 00183095 5/8/2002 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING lB 768.00 AP - 00t 83095 5/8/2002 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING IiX 768.00 AP - 00183096 5/8/2002 GIRON, SABINO 10.00 AP - 00183097 5/8/2002 GLENN JR., WILLIE 45.00 AP - 00183098 5/8/2002 GUARDIAN 2,697.36 AP - 00183099 5/8/2002 HAERR, DEBI 10.00 AP - 00183100 5/8/2002 HAROON, MEHNAZ 200.00 AP - 00183101 5/8/2002 HARRIS, SANDRA 40.00 AP - 00183102 5/8/2002 HENNIGAN, JENNIFER 50.00 AP - 00183103 5/8/2002 HO, CHRIS 850.00 AP - 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 65.19 AP - 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 285.53 AP - 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 440.72 AP 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 341.92 AP 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 44.18 AP 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 29.34 AP 00183104 5/8/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 134.18 AP 00183105 5/8/2002 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 98.00 AP - 00183105 5/8/2002 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 196.00 AP - 00183105 5/8/2002 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 238.00 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 05/28/7: Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time', 16:4 q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183106 5/8/2002 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP - 00183107 5/8/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 31.82 AP - 00183107 5/8/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 66.19 AP - 00183107 5/8/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 38.79 AP - 00183108 5/8/2002 HUERTA, MARY 200.00 AP - 00183109 5/8/2002 HUNT, JENNIFER 48.00 AP- 00183110 5/8/2002 HURST, CHERYL 313.50 AP - 00183111 5/8/2002 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 381.56 AP- 00183112 5/8/2002 IAPMA 80.00 AP- 00183113 5/8/2002 IBM CORPORATION 4,672.22 AP- 00183113 5/8/2002 IBM CORPORATION 1,292.50 AP- 00183113 5/8/2002 IBM CORPORATION 364.33 AP - 00183114 5/8/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 140.07 AP - 00183115 5/8/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 575.28 AP - 00183116 5/8/2002 JENSEN, NATALIE 56.00 AP - 00183117 5/8/2002 JOHNSON, RANDY 48.00 AP - 00183118 5/8/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,250.00 AP - 00183119 5/8/2002 KIM, JONG 38.00 AP - 00183120 5/8/2002 KLOPSCHINSKI, LISA 36.00 AP - 00183121 5/8/2002 KONGMEBOHL, BING 27.00 AP - 00183122 5/8/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 650.00 AP - 00183122 5/8/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 500.00 AP - 00183123 5/8/2002 KRUGER, RAY 20.00 AP - 00183124 5/8/2002 LAM, JACK 100.00 AP - 00183125 5/8/2002 LEE, HO 1,000.00 AP - 00183126 5/8/2002 LIL STITCH 2,297.30 AP - 00183126 5/8/2002 LIL STITCH 1,009.22 AP - 00183127 5/8/2002 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 528.00 AP - 00183128 5/8/2002 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 619.40 AP - 00183128 5/8/2002 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 376.91 AP - 00183128 5/8/2002 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 188.45 AP - 00183129 5/8/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00183130 5/8/2002 MAI1 STREET SIGNS 254.29 AP - 00183131 5/8/2002 MALONE, CANDRA 33.00 AP - 00183132 5/8/2002 MARCIA'S VERMICULTIJR~ COMPOST 340.00 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 117.92 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,301.44 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,516.28 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 6,770.02 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,521.73 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,560.77 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,085.52 AP- 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,539.52 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 161.73 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 61.45 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,603.86 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 58.46 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,749.92 AP - 00183133 5/8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IlC 17,768.98 AP - 00183134 5/8/2002 MATT'S HARDWARE 29.51 AP - 00183135 5/8/2002 MCARDLE, TAMMY 63.28 AP - 00183135 5/8/2002 MCARDLE, TAMMY 24.00 AP - 00183135 5/8/2002 MCARDLE, TAMMY 41.00 AP - 00183136 5/8/2002 MCLS 25.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP )0183137 5/8/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 926.65 AP 00183138 5/8/2002 MILLER, MEGHAN 4.25 AP 00183139 5/8/2002 MINUTEMAN PRESS 9,126.42 AP 00183140 5/8/2002 MIRANDA, PADDOCK 36.00 AP 00183141 5/8/2002 MMASC 35.00 AP 00183142 5/8/2002 MMASC 30.00 AP 00183143 5/8/2002 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP [NC 136.48 AP 00183144 5/8/2002 MULLIGAN, SONIA 50.00 AP 00183145 5/8/2002 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 13.85 AP - 00183146 5/8/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS [NC 68.93 AP - 00183147 5/8/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,187.77 AP - 00183148 5/8/2002 NATIONS RENT 21.55 AP - 00183149 5/8/2002 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS/NC 1,352.62 AP - 00183150 5/8/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 184.00 AP - 00183151 5/8/2002 NORWALK, CITY OF 553.79 AP - 00183152 5/8/2002 NOVAKOVICH, GEORGE 30.00 AP- 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 117.75 AP - 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -27.88 AP - 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 30.01 AP - 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 298.28 AP - 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 26.71 AP- 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 85.81 AP- 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 261.25 AP - 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 264.28 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 195.35 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 107.95 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.46 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 38.11 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 252.89 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 242.22 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 275.10 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 80.52 AP 00183153 5/812002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.73 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 173.54 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 51.71 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 14.01 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 79.52 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 44.78 AP 00183153 5/8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 342.62 AP 00183154 5/8/2002 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO 2,000.00 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 43.08 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 149.14 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -47.37 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 284.37 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 19.36 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.42 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 49.48 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 28.12 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10.75 AP 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.54 AP - 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 68.91 AP - 00183155 5/8/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.43 AP - 00183156 5/8/2002 ORTEGA, PHILLIP 45.00 AP - 00183157 5/8/2002 PAIZ, RiCARDO 127.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183158 5/8/2002 PANOSSIAN, ALICE 50.00 AP - 00183159 5/8/2002 PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUADE AND DOUGL/ 2,843.65 AP - 00183160 5/8/2002 PEP BOYS 41.74 AP - 00183161 5/8/2002 PEREZ, CARLOS 1,050.00 AP - 00183162 5/8/2002 PERRY, MARK A 54.00 AP - 00183163 5/8/2002 PERRY, MARK 45.00 AP - 00183164 5/8/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 3,400.00 AP - 00183164 5/8/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 1,243.87 AP - 00183165 5/8/2002 PMI 1,202.30 AP - 00183166 5/8/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 140.00 AP - 00183167 5/8/2002 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 346.6I AP - 00183167 5/8/2002 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 89.02 AP - 00183168 5/8/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 124.39 AP - 00183168 5/8/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 235.26 AP - 00183169 5/8/2002 PROJECT SISTER 388.00 AP - 00183170 5/8/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00183170 5/8/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP- 00183171 5/8/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 17.24 AP - 00183172 5/8/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00183173 5/8/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 140.00 AP ~ 00183174 5/8/2002 RAGAN, JAMES P RPT 300.00 AP - 00183175 5/8/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 62.28 AP - 00183175 5/8/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 36.74 AP - 00183175 5/8/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 64.26 AP - 00183176 5/8/2002 REDINGER, TOM 92.00 AP - 00183177 5/8/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00183178 5/8/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 17.19 AP - 00183179 5/8/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP - 00183179 5/8/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP - 00183179 5/8/2002 RHI CONSULTING 512.00 AP - 00183179 5/8/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP - 00183179 5/8/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP - 00183180 5/8/2002 RHINO LININGS OF RANCHO 180.00 AP - 00183181 5/8/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00183182 5/8/2002 RODRIGUEZ, ALICIA 50.77 AP - 00183183 5/8/2002 ROSAS, LIRIO 47.12 .AP - 00183184 5/8/2002 RUIZ, PEDRO 45.00 AP - 00183185 5/8/2002 RYMAN, CANDY 62.00 AP - 00183186 5/8/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 424.48 AP - 00183186 5/8/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 248.31 AP - 00183187 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68 AP - 00183188 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 200.00 AP - 00183189 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 107,534.85 AP - 00183190 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 271.96 AP - 00183191 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 200.00 AP - 00183192 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 26,834.09 AP - 00183193 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 99,525.00 AP - 00183194 5/8/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 95.90 AP - 00183195 5/8/2002 SAN CLEMENTE, CITY OF 50.00 AP - 00183196 5/8/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 193.95 AP - 00183197 5/8/2002 SANDOVAL, JERRY 45.00 AP - 00183198 5/8/2002 SAUM, ELENA 46.00 AP - 00183198 5/8/2002 SAUM, ELENA 30.00 AP - 00183199 5/8/2002 SCHOLTZ, DEBORAH 41.51 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183200 5/8/2002 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS 7,298.17 AP - 00183201 5/8/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50 AP - 00183202 5/8/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 115.83 AP - 00183203 5/8/2002 SMART AND FINAL t 19.07 AP - 00183203 5/8/2002 SMART AND FINAL 11.56 AP - 00183203 5/8/2002 SMART AND FINAL 46.17 AP - 00183203 5/8/2002 SMART AND FINAL 120.53 AP - 00183203 5/8/2002 SMART AND FINAL 221.75 AP - 00183204 5/8/2002 SMITH BROTHERS GLASS 1,582.05 AP - 00183205 5/8/2002 SMITH MANUFACTURING COMPANY 8,219.00 AP - 00183206 5/8/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 1,580.98 AP - 00183206 5/8/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 476.44 AP - 00183207 5/8/2002 SOPKIN, STEVE 55.00 AP - 00183207 5/8/2002 SOPK1N, STEVE 5.00 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.27 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.64 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.20 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.23 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t2.23 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.99 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.41 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHEILN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.86 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.56 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOILNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.36 AP - 00t 83211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.60 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOP,2qIA EDISON 12.36 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.93 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.70 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.38 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.55 AP - 0018321 l 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.49 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.08 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORaN/A EDISON 12.68 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.63 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time;.., 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.86 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.16 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,037.05 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.42 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.03 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.24 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.58 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,559.01 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,704.84 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,559.63 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 895.03 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.10 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 179.26 AP- 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.91 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.00 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.00 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.07 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.83 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.86 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.84 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.09 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.54 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.77 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 05/28/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:., t 6:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.02 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOR~NIA EDISON 147.47 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.40 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.90 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.55 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.70 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.18 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.23 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.78 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.62 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.86 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.22 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.12 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.78 AP 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.02 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.85 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.23 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.67 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.06 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.12 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183211 5/8/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.54 AP - 00183212 5/8/2002 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 137.50 AP- 00183213 5/8/2002 STATE NET 275.00 AP - 00183214 5/8/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 49.65 AP - 00183215 5/8/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 662.36 AP - 00183216 5/8/2002 STATE OF CALIF 49,319.00 AP - 00183217 5/8/2002 STEVENS, MICHELE 100.00 AP - 00183218 5/8/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00 AP - 00183219 5/8/2002 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 1,400.00 AP - 00183220 5/8/2002 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 3,600.00 AP q 00183221 5/8/2002 TARGET 188.10 AP - 00183221 5/8/2002 TARGET 150.83 AP - 00183221 5/8/2002 TARGET 110.29 AP - 00183221 5/8/2002 TARGET 607.65 AP - 00183221 5/8/2002 TARGET 301.64 AP - 00183222 5/8/2002 TARGET 96.05 AP - 00183223 5/8/2002 TOXGUARD 427.79 AP - 00183224 5/8/2002 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP - 00183225 5/8/2002 TYPECARE 49.50 AP - 00183226 5/8/2002 UNITED RENTALS 123.28 AP - 00183227 5/8/2002 UNITED WAY 628.32 AP - 00183228 5/8/2002 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 1,883.90 AP - 00183229 5/8/2002 USPS/PITNEY BOWES 4,500.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 05/28/;: Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.:,,. 16:4 /O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 371.59 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.28 AP - 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.04 AP 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.69 AP 00183230 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP 00183230 5/8/2002 VEPdZON CALIFORNIA 22.32 AP 00183231 5/8/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,650.00 AP 00183232 5/8/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00 AP 00183233 5/8/2002 VILLALUZ, TED 27.00 AP 00I 83234 5/8/2002 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANANGER VPM 500.00 AP 00183235 5/8/2002 VL SYSTEMS INC 2,525.00 AP 00183236 5/8/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP 00183237 5/8/2002 WE TIP 225.00 AP 00183238 5/8/2002 WESTERN CONTAINER 144.00 AP - 00183239 5/8/2002 WHITE, LARRY 46.00 AP - 00183240 5/8/2002 WHITHORN, LARRY 100.00 AP - 00183241 5/8/2002 WILLIAMS, DIANE 100.00 AP - 00183242 5/8/2002 WITTER, JOANNE 240.00 AP - 00183242 5/8/2002 WITTER, JOANNE 240.00 AP - 00183243 5/8/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89 AP - 00183244 5/8/2002 YEE, LARRY 72.00 AP - 00183245 5/9/2002 SMOKEY MOUNTAIN BBQ 2,855.38 AP - 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,053.15 AP - 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 238.27 AP - 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL -789.87 AP- 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 727.32 AP - 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,408.26 AP - 00183246 5/15/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 637.58 AP- 00183247 5/15/2002 ABERNATHY, KERI 33.00 AP- 00183247 5/15/2002 ABERNATHY, KERI 5.00 AP- 00183248 5/15/2002 ABLETRONICS 42.02 AP - 00183249 5/15/2002 ADAMS, DEBRA 200.00 AP- 00183250 5/15/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00 AP- 00183251 5/15/2002 AMAZON.COMCREDIT 25.75 AP- 00183252 5/15/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 104.96 AP - 00183253 5/15/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.39 AP - 00183253 5/15/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 140.68 AP- 00183254 5/15/2002 ANDERSON, JOAN 20.00 AP- 00183255 5/15/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 1,049.44 AP- 00183256 5/15/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 564.48 AP- 00183257 5/15/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 936.99 AP- 00183257 5/15/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1,970.77 AP- 00183258 5/15/2002 AVIS 177.18 AP - 00183259 5/15/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 440.22 AP - 00183259 5/15/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 299.74 AP - 00183259 5/15/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 374.94 AP - 00183259 5/15/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 499.34 AP - 00183259 5/15/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 237.61 AP- 00183260 5/15/2002 BERKLINE CORP 65.20 AP - 00183261 5/15/2002 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 923.87 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 05/28/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183262 5/15/2002 BISHOP COMPANY 70.75 AP- 00183262 5/15/2002 BISHOP COMPANY 276.94 AP-00183263 5/15/2002 BONNEVILLE, SHIRLEY 40.00 AP-00183263 5/15/2002 BONNEVILLE, SHIRLEY 40.00 AP-00183263 5/15/2002 BONNEVILLE, SHIRLEY 20.00 AP - 00183264 5/15/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE YNC 234.07 AP- 00183264 5/15/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 68.96 AP- 00183265 5/15/2002 BORDNER, MARGIE 300.00 AP- 00183266 5/15/2002 BOWERS, REGINA 80.00 AP-00183267 5/15/2002 BOWERY, ROBERT 15.41 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 248.42 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 121.87 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 384.34 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 20.90 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.38 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 475.55 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68 AP- 00183274 5/I5/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.38 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 19.82 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.56 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 24.57 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.47 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 17.20 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 50.43 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 23.06 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 52.96 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 20.90 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 16.22 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 27.75 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 48.65 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 61.58 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 28.12 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.22 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 64.49 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 43.96 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 9.37 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 41.42 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 112.76 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP - 00183274 5/I5/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.21 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 54.74 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 18.38 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.32 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.70 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 43.05 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 10.63 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.10 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 70.04 User: ahrmsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time:~ 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Cheek No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 80.93 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.32 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 12.57 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 180.21 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 106.57 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 50.21 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 108.55 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 137.63 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.51 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 67.79 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 34.40 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 48.44 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 9.18 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.93 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 7.72 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 123.81 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 24.25 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 21.34 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 30.03 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 107.29 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 14.75 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 62.59 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 10.66 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 48.47 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.71 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 138.67 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.75 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 262.07 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 247.22 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 48.49 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.35 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.90 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 27.58 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.26 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 24.23 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 132.34 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 277.10 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.93 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 19.38 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 60.92 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 67.84 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 34.82 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.93 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.93 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 46.58 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 1,149.92 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.40 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.44 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 35.31 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 38.47 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 89.92 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 344.18 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 05/28/~: Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time( t 16:4 lq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 1,282.83 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 9.20 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 26.16 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 24.88 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 7.76 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 155.22 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35 AP ~00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 13.54 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 37.12 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 45.38 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 22.50 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 114.25 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 21.50 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.21 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 5.16 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.03 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 72.64 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 24.19 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 46.03 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 145.27 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 32.43 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 84.86 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 26.14 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.90 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 28.08 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 30.83 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.64 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.81 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.40 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.63 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 330.46 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.50 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.05 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.10 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.93 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 356.05 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 610.95 · AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 74.47 AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 53.25 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 34.32 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 37.78 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.93 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 32.43 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 64.49 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 108.45 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 264.05 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 132.64 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 37.50 AP 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68 AP- 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.75 AP - 00183274 5/15/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP-00183275 5/15/2002 BRODIE, ELLEN 30.00 AP-00183275 5/15/2002 BRODIE, ELLEN 40.00 AP- 00183276 5/15/2002 CAMPBELL, JANE 40.00 AP - 00183277 5/15/2002 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO 1NC 500.00 AP- 00183278 5/15/2002 CARREON, LISA 150.00 AP-00183279 5/15/2002 CARVALHO, ELMER ' 30.00 AP - 00183280 5/15/2002 CENTRAL SCHOOL PTO 190.98 AP- 00183281 5/15/2002 CENTURION INDUSTRIES INC 34.39 AP - 00183282 5/15/2002 CHIEF NELSON RETIREMENT COMMITTEE FUb 45.00 AP- 00183283 5/15/2002 CHINO, CITY OF 600.00 AP- 00183284 5/15/2002 CLASSROOMDIRECT.COM 232.70 AP-00183285 5/15/2002 CLAVILLE, JERNICA 33.00 AP- 00183285 5/15/2002 CLAVILLE, JERNICA 5.00 AP - 00183286 5/15/2002 CLEAN FUEL CONNECTION INC 2,025.00 AP- 00183287 5/15/2002 CLEAR, CATHY 66.00 AP 00183288 5/15/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 228.95 AP 00183288 5/15/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 11.77 AP 00183288 5/15/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 37.50 AP 00183289 5/15/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 394.37 AP 00183289 5/15/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 1,038.33 AP 00183289 5/15/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 743.48 AP 00183289 5/15/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 323.98 AP 00183290 5/15/2002 CRATES, PATRICIA 20.00 AP 00183291 5/15/2002 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 26.02 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 144.83 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 33.90 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 101.14 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 101.09 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 146.86 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 32.95 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 227.13 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 287.08 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 50.22 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 269.86 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 32.96 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 342.81 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 75.23 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 117.36 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 429.80 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 88.79 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 354.13 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 386.47 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,917.66 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 59.35 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 185.40 AP 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 308.66 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 256.49 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 191.49 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 299.14 AP - 00183292 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 387.49 AP- 00183293 5/15/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,120.00 AP - 00183294 5/15/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 45,080.00 AP-00183295 5/15/2002 DEFORGE, DEBBIE 12.00 AP- 00183296 5/15/2002 DETCO 489.99 AP-00183296 5/15/2002 DETCO 57.65 AP-00183297 5/15/2002 DOUGLASS, DONNA 50.00 AP-00183298 5/15/2002 DURNIE, HELEN 28.00 AP 00183299 5/15/2002 ELEVEN WESTERN BUILDERS 500.00 AP 00183300 5/15/2002 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 2,348.00 AP 00183301 5/15/2002 ESCOBAR, SANTIAGO 35.00 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.63 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.54 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.19 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.52 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.23 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.15 AP 00183302 5/15/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.17 AP 00183303 5/15/2002 FELIPES TAQUERIA 95.00 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 696.00 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 928.00 AP 00183304 5/t5/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 603.50 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 705.08 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 48.75 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 F1NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 87.75 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 F1NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,108.80 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 277.70 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 811.85 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 928.00 AP 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 928.00 AP - 00183304 5/15/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 788.80 AP- 00183305 5/15/2002 FIORE, BECK MARKES 20.00 AP- 00183306 5/15/2002 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS INC 150.00 AP- 00183307 5/15/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 95.99 AP- 00183307 5/15/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 134.77 AP - 00183307 5/15/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 148.43 AP- 00183308 5/15/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 168.00 AP - 00183309 5/15/2002 GIN, CATHERINE 30.00 AP- 00183309 5/15/2002 GIN, CATHERINE 40.00 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDAREGPORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 /7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00183309 5/15/2002 GIN, CATHERINE 40.00 AP 00183310 5/15/2002 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 255.00 AP 00183311 5/15/2002 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 135.00 AP 00183312 5/15/2002 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 AP 00183313 5/15/2002 GRA1NGER, WW 99.33 AP 00183313 5/15/2002 GRAINGER, WW 51.17 AP 00183313 5/15/2002 GRAINGER, WW 218.67 AP 00183313 5/15/2002 GRAINGER, WW 16.95 AP 00183313 5/15/2002 GRAINGER, WW 354.46 AP-00183314 5/15/2002 GRANT, OTHA 40.00 AP- 00183314 5/15/2002 GRANT, OTHA 30.00 AP - 00183315 5/15/2002 GUSTAFSON CONSULTING, DAVID 2,000.00 AP- 00183316 5/15/2002 HAIL~LAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 290.49 AP - 00183317 5/15/2002 HARMONY ARTISTS INC 1,700.00 AP - 00183318 5/15/2002 HARPSTER OF PHILIPSBURG INC 830.50 AP- 00183319 5/15/2002 HARVEY, MARGARET 40.00 AP - 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 144.10 AP- 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 218.37 AP - 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 35.05 AP - 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO -251.22 AP 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO -95.52 AP 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO -32.04 AP 00183320 5/15/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 55.03 AP 00183321 5/15/2002 HILTON PALACIO DEL RIO 558.00 AP 00183322 5/15/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 7.36 AP 00183322 5/15/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, SM 28.26 AP 00183322 5/15/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 217.22 AP 00183323 5/15/2002 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 9,222.16 AP 00183324 5/15/2002 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 163.42 AP 00183325 5/15/2002 ICMA 1,032.00 AP 00183326 5/15/2002 ID BURR 18.64 AP 00183326 5/15/2002 ID BURR 735.39 AP 00183327 5/15/2002 IESAPA 50.00 AP 00183327 5/15/2002 IESAPA 81.00 AP 00183327 5/15/2002 IESAPA 53.00 AP 00183327 5/15/2002 IESAPA 50.00 AP 00183328 5/15/2002 IMAGE COMMUNICATIONS 174.23 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLET1N 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 276.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 276.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60 AP 00183329 5/15/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 276.60 AP- 00183330 5/15/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 180.00 AP - 00183330 5/15/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 111.55 AP - 00183331 5/15/2002 JACKETTI, WANDA 40.00 AP - 00183332 5/15/2002 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 225.00 AP - 00183333 5/15/2002 JASON VANSCOY 500.00 AP - 00183334 5/15/2002 JENNINGS, GINA 60.00 AP - 00183335 5/15/2002 JENSEN, ERiC 174.50 AP - 00183336 5/15/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 2,500.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 05/28/7: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:.~, 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183337 5/15/2002 JONES, NATALIE 220.00 AP-00183338 5/15/2002 JONES, ROBERT 200.00 AP - 00183339 5/15/2002 JUANLI TIAN 250.00 AP- 00183340 5/15/2002 JUAREZ, JENNIFER 40.00 AP- 00183341 5/15/2002 KEITH, BARBARA 270.00 AP- 00183342 5/15/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 50.59 AP - 00183342 5/15/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 34.24 AP - 00183343 5/15/2002 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 98.18 AP- 00183344 5/15/2002 LA VOZ 540.00 AP- 00183345 5/15/2002 LEOLA DELOS SANTOS 250.00 AP-00183346 5/15/2002 LEON, LUIS 57.00 AP- 00183347 5/15/2002 LEONHARDT, EILEEN 20.00 AP-00183348 5/15/2002 LEUCH, LOIS 20.00 AP- 00183349 5/15/2002 LIANG, ANNA 45.00 AP- 00183350 5/15/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 650.00 AP- 00183350 5/15/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 312.48 AP - 00183350 5/15/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 275.00 AP - 00183351 5/15/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 234.77 AP - 00183351 5/15/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 157.31 AP - 00183351 5/15/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 272.66 AP - 00183351 5/15/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 210.38 AP- 00183351 5/15/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 398.70 AP-00183352 5/15/2002 MACDONALD, KAREN 33.00 AP- 00183353 5/15/2002 MAGIC SHOE REPAIR 110.50 AP- 00183353 5/15/2002 MAGIC SHOE REPAIR 421.00 AP-00183354 5/15/2002 MARICIC, MARIA 14.00 AP- 00183355 5/15/2002 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 214.75 AP- 00183356 5/15/2002 MAURICIO, JOHN 56.00 AP- 00183357 5/15/2002 MCLS 25.00 AP- 00183358 5/15/2002 MCVEY, MARCIA 49.00 AP - 00183359 5/15/2002 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 3,733.59 AP - 00183359 5/15/2002 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 311.47 AP - 00183359 5/15/2002 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 311.46 AP- 00183360 5/15/2002 MELLEM, SANDRA 48.64 AP- 00183361 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 216.75 AP- 00183361 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 564.38 AP-00183361 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 216.75 AP- 00183361 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 216.75 AP-00183362 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 6,927.98 AP- 00183362 5/15/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 12,859.46 AP - 00183363 5/15/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00 AP - 00183363 5/15/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 150.00 AP- 00183363 5/15/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 125.00 AP- 00183364 5/15/2002 MINUTEMAN PRESS 199.34 AP- 00183364 5/15/2002 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,753.94 AP - 00183365 5/15/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 32.14 AP - 00183366 5/15/2002 MR TS 24HR TOWING 110.00 AP- 00183367 5/15/2002 MUDD, LENNELL 53.00 AP - 00183368 5/15/2002 MUELLER, ICRISTEN 30.00 AP - 00183369 5/15/2002 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 1,729.60 AP- 00183370 5/15/2002 NAFISSI, BEHROON 255.00 AP - 00183371 5/15/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP- 00183372 5/15/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 235.00 AP - 00183373 5/15/2002 OBA, HARUKO 30.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 05/28/2 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 193.10 AP-00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 63.59 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 88.09 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.48 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 77.28 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 21.47 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.80 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 219.81 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 263.27 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 208.84 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 134.61 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 79.40 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 139.58 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 43.18 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 132.50 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 10.11 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.11 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 46.83 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.10 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 31.16 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 295.65 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.85 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -106.18 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 370.41 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 44.61 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 33.19 AP 00183374 5/15/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 209.74 AP 00183375 5/15/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 187.88 AP 00183375 5/15/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 406.33 AP 00183375 5/15/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 15.97 AP 00183375 5/15/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 532.6l AP 00183375 5/15/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 67.58 AP 00183376 5/15/2002 PAIZ, RICARDO 127.00 AP 00183377 5/15/2002 PANDA DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ~ 10,050.00 AP 00183378 5/15/2002 PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUADE AND DOUGL,t 9,568.74 AP 00183379 5/15/2002 PATTON SALES CORP 15.41 AP 00183380 5/15/2002 PETERMANLUMBER 23.27 AP 00183381 5/15/2002 PHILLIPS, HILDA 30.00 AP 00183381 5/15/2002 PHILLIPS, HILDA 20.00 AP 00183382 5/15/2002 PITASSI, PETER J 4,984.05 AP 00183382 5/15/2002 PITASS1, PETER J 2,990.20 AP 00183383 5/15/2002 PITNEY BOWES 618.00 AP 00183384 5/15/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 70.00 AP 00183385 5/15/2002 POWELL, LEE 73.00 AP 00183386 5/15/2002 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 1.27 AP 00183387 5/15/2002 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 103.04 AP 00183388 5/15/2002 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 93.70 AP 00183389 5/15/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 2,239.19 AP 00183390 5/15/2002 R AND R GARAGE DOORS 1,219.00 AP- 00183391 5/15/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 105.00 AP- 00183392 5/15/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 44.99 AP - 00183393 5/15/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00 AP - 00183394 5/15/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 15.00 AP- 00183395 5/15/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 137.38 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183396 5/15/2002 REDINGER, TOM 54.00 AP- 00183397 5/15/2002 REGULATION COMPLIANCE 1NC 1,960.00 AP - 00183398 5/15/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1,933.03 AP- 00183399 5/15/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP- 00183399 5/15/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00 AP- 00183400 5/15/2002 RIVERSIDEBLUEPR1NT 213.71 AP-00183400 5/15/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 34.26 AP- 00183401 5/15/2002 RODGERS, MONICA 14.00 AP-00183402 5/15/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 298.99 AP- 00183403 5/15/2002 SALAZAR, CLAUDIA 16.50 AP- 00183404 5/15/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP- 00183405 5/15/2002 SANTANA, AUGUSTUS 20.00 AP - 00183406 5/15/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 844.53 AP- 00183406 5/15/2002 SBC/PACIFICBELL 476.41 AP-00183407 5/15/2002 SELKEE, EDITH 40.00 AP- 00183408 5/15/2002 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 218.05 AP - 00183409 5/15/2002 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 327.35 AP - 00183410 5/I5/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 373.89 AP - 00183411 5/15/2002 SIGN SOURCE, THE 107.75 AP- 00183412 5/15/2002 SLJ AUDIO SERVICES 1,200.00 AP - 00183413 5/15/2002 SMART AND FINAL 55.47 AP- 00183413 5/15/2002 SMART AND FINAL 426.08 AP- 00183413 5/15/2002 SMART AND FINAL 79.36 AP- 00183413 5/15/2002 SMART AND FINAL 66.59 AP - 00183413 5/15/2002 SMART AND FINAL 79.56 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 19,429.89 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 181.47 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 46,260.21 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 44.24 AP- 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,727.75 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,868.67 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 12,120.96 AP - 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 4,212.90 AP- 00183414 5/15/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 14,992.80 AP- 00183415 5/15/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 253.49 AP - 00183415 5/15/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,629.16 AP 00183415 5/15/2002 SOCALIFGAS COMPANY 94.15 AP 00183415 5/15/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 212.21 AP 00183416 5/15/2002 SONSATIONALACTIVITIES 750.00 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.49 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.89 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.75 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.64 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.96 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.22 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.78 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 05/28L~ Report: CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 ,2/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.52 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.09 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.88 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.72 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.43 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.31 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.95 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.00 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.37 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.97 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.78 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.81 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.25 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.84 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,680.08 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.54 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,341.88 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.43 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.57 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.23 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.81 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.55 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.18 AP -00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1SON 131.94 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.60 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.73 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.74 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.52 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.47 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.32 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.91 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.30 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06 AP- 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.93 AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.73 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 05/28/.~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name .Amount AP - 00183418 5/15/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP- 00183419 5/15/2002 SPECIALTY CLEANING SYSTEMS 4,100.00 AP - 00183420 5/15/2002 STAGE SYSTEMS 2,700.00 AP- 00183421 5/15/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 364.10 AP-00183422 5/15/2002 TARGET 399.40 AP- 00183423 5/15/2002 TEAM HECTIC CLOTHING 817.50 AP - 00183424 5/15/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 56.00 AP 00183425 5/15/2002 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 7,810.00 AP 00183426 5/15/2002 TOPETE, ESTELLE 48.00 AP 00183427 5/15/2002 TOWNSEND-SCHANTZ, RHONDA 40.00 AP 00183428 5/15/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,800.00 AP 00183428 5/15/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 300.00 AP 00183429 5/15/2002 TRUXIGN 393.72 AP 00183430 5/15/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 480.00 AP 00183430 5/15/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,449.50 AP 00183430 5/15/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 460.00 AP 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.41 AP 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.28 AP 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 32.05 AP 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 64.47 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 99.21 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 55.01 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.13 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 88.17 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 392.87 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.58 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.58 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.58 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.13 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 83.16 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.68 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 206.53 AP-00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 84.47 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.38 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.05 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 34.95 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.02 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.12 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 181.74 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.24 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.27 AP - 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.73 AP -00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZONCALIFORN1A 28.95 AP- 00183431 5/15/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.03 AP- 00183432 5/15/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 48.01 AP - 00183433 5/15/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 324.00 AP - 00183433 5/15/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 156.00 AP - 00183434 5/15/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 1,115.41 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183434 5/15/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 2,039.47 AP- 00183435 5/15/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 351.13 AP 00183436 5/15/2002 WEBB, ROBYN 77.00 AP 00183437 5/15/2002 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 39.24 AP 00183438 5/15/2002 WEST GROUP 129.30 AP 00183439 5/15/2002 WHAT'SPOPIN 200.00 AP 00183440 5/15/2002 WHITE CAP 1,685.16 AP 00183441 5/15/2002 WILLDANASSOCIATES 44,712.50 AP 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 192.67 AP 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 9.36 AP 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 48.05 AP 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 168.63 AP- 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 1,528.37 AP- 00183442 5/15/2002 WORLDCOM 661.09 AP- 00183443 5/15/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP- 00183444 5/15/2002 YEE, LARRY 60.00 AP- 00183445 5/15/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 35.00 AP - 00183446 5/16/2002 ABLAC 16.39 AP-00183448 5/16/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 409.90 AP - 00183448 5/16/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 762.26 AP - 00183448 5/16/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 118.85 AP- 00183448 5/16/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 2,649.92 AP- 00183448 5/16/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 79.59 AP- 00183450 5/16/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP- 00183451 5/16/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP- 00183453 5/16/2002 DICK, ERIC 5.00 AP - 00183456 5/16/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP - 00183457 5/16/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 8,900.31 AP- 00183459 5/16/2002 RCPFA 4,187.33 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 453.89 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 58.33 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 49.89 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 44.04 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 28.63 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 59.49 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 49.20 AP - 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 46.26 AP 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 55.37 AP 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 4,391.60 AP 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 5,940.58 AP 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,388.66 AP 00183462 5/16/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,899.72 AP 00183463 5/16/2002 STANDARD PACIFIC 4,000.00 AP 00183463 5/16/2002 STANDARD PACIFIC 4,200.00 AP 00183463 5/16/2002 STANDARD PACIFIC 4,500.00 AP 00183463 5/16/2002 STANDARD PACIFIC 4,250.00 AP 00183463 5/16/2002 STANDARD PACIFIC 4,150.00 AP 00183464 5/22/2002 4 ACE CONSTRUCTION 29,102.00 AP 00183465 5/22/2002 91 EXPRESS LANES 250.00 AP 00183466 5/22/2002 AANDAAUTOMOTIVE 55.00 AP 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 59.95 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 257.58 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 185.64 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~. 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 13.70 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 13.70 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.08 AP ~ 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 18.54 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 43.38 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE I 1.00 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 100.05 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 21.69 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 21.69 AP - 00183467 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 43.38 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.62 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP- 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 52.98 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.29 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 149.82 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 724.06 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 57.28 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 211.82 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 403.11 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 265.47 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 960.84 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 49.31 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 500.46 AP - 00183468 ,5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,661.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.25 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 312.55 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 498.38 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 47.77 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 213.83 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 313.05 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 108.29 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,254.01 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 60.31 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.93 AP - 00183468 5/22/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 424.09 AP- 00183469 5/22/2002 A JONTUE, ROSEANN 5,347.00 AP - 00183470 5/22/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 376.11 AP - 00183470 5/22/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 49.54 AP - 00183470 5/22/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 74.05 AP - 00183470 5/22/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO [NC 201.21 AP - 00183470 5/22/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 688.81 AP- 00183471 5/22/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 51.72 AP- 00183471 5/22/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 22.08 AP- 00183471 5/22/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 220.63 AP - 00183471 5/22/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 182.27 AP- 00183472 5/22/2002 ABLAC 294.06 AP- 00183473 5/22/2002 ABLETRONICS 13.50 AP - 00183473 5/22/2002 ABLETRONICS 29.77 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 User: ahunsber - Aah Hunsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Yendor Name Amount AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND 2~RUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP - 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 69.99 AP 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 69.99 AP 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP 00183474 5/22/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 49.99 AP 00183475 5/22/2002 AIRGAS WEST 412.69 AP 00183476 5/22/2002 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 4,303.30 AP 00183477 5/22/2002 ALL PHASES PAINTING 2,500.00 AP 00183478 5/22/2002 ALLEN'S BOOTS 107.74 AP 00183479 5/22/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 97.95 AP 00183480 5/22/2002 ALPHAGRAPHICS 279.40 AP 00183481 5/22/2002 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 60.25 AP 00183482 5/22/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 440.09 AP 00183483 5/22/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 29.85 AP 00183484 5/22/2002 AMERI NATIONAL 260.00 AP 00183485 5/22/2002 AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY 400.00 AP 00183486 5/22/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 78.32 AP - 00183486 5/22/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 25.41 AP - 00183486 5/22/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER 1NC 29.09 AP - 00183486 5/22/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 65.11 AP- 00183487 5/22/2002 AMERICAS BODY COMPANY 344.98 AP- 00183487 5/22/2002 AMERICAS BODY COMPANY 1,075.00 AP- 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,080.00 AP - 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,264.00 AP- 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERKA DESIGN GROUP 1,152.00 AP - 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERKA DESIGN GROUP 927.04 AP - 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,008.00 AP - 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 947.50 AP - 00183488 5/22/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,319.12 AP- 00183489 5/22/2002 ARIZONA PIPE LINE 3,215.00 AP - 00183490 5/22/2002 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES 7.54 AP - 00183491 5/22/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 220.00 AP- 00183492 5/22/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 2,103.53 AP- 00183493 5/22/2002 AUTOMATED MAILING SYSTEMS INC 2,000.00 AP - 00183494 5/22/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 387.61 AP - 00183494 5/22/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 15.72 AP- 00183494 5/22/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 27.28 AP - 00183494 5/22/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 50.38 AP- 00183495 5/22/2002 BAKER, DUANE 250.00 AP- 00183496 5/22/2002 BECORE PROMOTIONS INC 2,300.00 AP - 00183497 5/22/2002 BENDER AND CO INC, MATTHEW 5,750.00 AP - 00183498 5/22/2002 BENDER AND CO INC, MATTHEW 3,395.44 AP - 00183499 5/22/2002 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 496.51 AP - 00183499 5/22/2002 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 62.07 AP- 00183500 5/22/2002 BRODART BOOKS 548.12 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report: CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183500 5/22/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 190.80 AP - 00183500 5/22/2002 BRODART BOOKS 170.26 AP - 00183501 5/22/2002 BUCKNAM AND ASSOCIATES 1,112.30 AP- 00183502 5/22/2002 CARRIAGE ESTATES II LLC 1,816.55 AP- 00183503 5/22/2002 CASTILLO, JESSIE 250.00 AP- 00183504 5/22/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 20.47 AP- 00183504 5/22/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 281.23 AP- 00183505 5/22/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 152.58 AP- 00183506 5/22/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 2,141.53 AP- 00183507 5/22/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 988.00 AP- 00183507 5/22/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 480.00 AP - 00183508 5/22/2002 CHEVRON USA INC 109.80 AP- 00183509 5/22/2002 CHILDS WORLD, THE 160.34 AP- 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR1NTERACTIVE LP 1,075.03 AP- 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVE LP 12.76 AP - 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 67.43 AP - 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTEP,.ACTIVE LP 261.01 AP - 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTEIL4.CTIVE LP 12.76 AP- 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,205.53 AP - 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 176.80 AP- 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 263.93 AP ~ 00183510 5/22/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 570.14 AP - 00183511 5/22/2002 CISNEROS, WRAYANNE 40.00 AP- 00183512 5/22/2002 CITY RENTALS 36.98 AP- 00183512 5/22/2002 CITY RENTALS 222.38 AP-00183513 5/22/2002 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 7,848.00 AP- 00183514 5/22/2002 CLOUT 32.00 AP-00183514 5/22/2002 CLOUT 32.00 AP - 00183515 5/22/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 274.14 AP- 00183515 5/22/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 9.82 AP- 00183516 5/22/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 199.50 AP - 00183517 5/22/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 187.49 AP- 00183518 5/22/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP- 00183519 5/22/2002 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES 2,715.80 AP - 00183520 5/22/2002 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 1,019.75 AP - 00183521 5/22/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP ~ 00183522 5/22/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP- 00183523 5/22/2002 CP AND DR 249.00 AP-00183524 5/22/2002 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 77.63 AP- 00183525 5/22/2002 CSTI 350.00 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 94.13 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 251.60 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 307.61 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 577.48 AP- 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 60.63 AP- 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 841.85 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 158.52 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 632.52 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 60.66 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 59.54 AP- 00~83526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 268.81 AP- 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 522.27 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.1 t AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 510.06 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 26 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REGPORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 156.39 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 665.62 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 229.35 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 333.32 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 185.52 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 495.39 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 493.97 AP- 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 520.23 AP - 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 61.56 AP- 00183526 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 490.72 AP - 00183527 5/22/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,717.00 AP - 00183528 5/22/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 6,300.00 AP- 00183529 5/22/2002 D 7 CONSULTING INC 500.00 AP- 00183529 5/22/2002 D 7 CONSULTING INC 500.00 AP- 00183529 5/22/2002 D 7 CONSULTING INC 250.00 AP - 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 229.51 AP- 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 252.14 AP - 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 711.15 AP - 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 646.50 AP - 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 921.27 AP - 00183530 5/22/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 248.91 AP - 00183531 5/22/2002 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 264.50 AP- 00183532 5/22/2002 DICK, ERIC 37.50 AP- 00183532 5/22/2002 DICK, ERIC 37.50 AP- 00183533 5/22/2002 DICK, ERIC 327.50 AP- 00183534 5/22/2002 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 20.05 AP - 00183535 5/22/2002 DURA ART STONE 2,000.00 AP- 00183535 5/22/2002 DURA ART STONE 1,883.15 AP - 00183535 5/22/2002 DURA ART STONE 2,000.00 AP-00183536 5/22/2002 EMERY, KAREN 73.37 AP- 00183537 5/22/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 2,754.89 AP - 00183538 5/22/2002 ESGIL CORPORATION 21,143.03 AP- 00183539 5/22/2002 ETUKUDO, MFON 150.00 AP- 00183540 5/22/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 7.49 AP- 00183540 5/22/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 633.87 AP- 00183540 5/22/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 245.81 AP - 00183540 5/22/2002 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 338.85 AP- 00183540 5/22/2002 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,305.98 AP - 00183540 5/22/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 76.83 AP- 00183541 5/22/2002 EXPLORER UNIT 539 2,050.00 AP- 00183542 5/22/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.26 AP - 00183542 5/22/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.17 AP- 00183542 5/22/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.83 AP- 00183542 5/22/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.91 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 508.73 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 714.00 AP - 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 248.63 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP - 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 970.20 AP- 00183543 5/22/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 253.50 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 27 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00183544 5/22/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 118.53 AP-00183545 5/22/2002 FITCH, RON 27.00 AP- 00183546 5/22/2002 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00 AP - 00183547 5/22/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 97.94 AP- 00183548 5/22/2002 FROSTY'S FOREST FARM 500.00 AP - 00183549 5/22/2002 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,070.00 AP - 00183550 5/22/2002 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 841.74 AP- 00183551 5/22/2002 GAREY, LINDA 48.00 AP- 00183552 5/22/2002 GCS SERVICE 1NC 175.85 AP-00183553 5/22/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 38.79 AP-00183553 5/22/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 5,517.88 AP- 00183553 5/22/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 439.62 AP- 00183553 5/22/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 3,855.75 AP-00183553 5/22/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 284.46 AP- 00183554 5/22/2002 GOMEZ, FABIAN 100.00 AP- 00183555 5/22/2002 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 15.00 AP- 00183556 5/22/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 151.85 AP- 00183556 5/22/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 47.72 AP- 00183556 5/22/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 37.43 AP- 00183556 5/22/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 127.51 AP - 00183556 5/22/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 224.23 AP - 00183557 5/22/2002 HARPER, CHRISTINA 32.00 AP-00183558 5/22/2002 HAWKINS, KAREL 18.90 AP- 00183559 5/22/2002 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 55.76 AP- 00183560 5/22/2002 HENDERSON, LARRY 92.60 AP-00183560 5/22/2002 HENDERSON, LARRY 105.67 AP- 00183561 5/22/2002 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 398.81 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 188.04 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 453.12 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 132.03 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 29.04 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 588.54 AP- 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 91.30 AP - 00183562 5/22/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 31.32 AP- 00183563 5/22/2002 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 107.75 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 199.38 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 154.90 AP - 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 119.07 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 209.29 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 652.91 AP - 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 247.40 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF. THE 161.66 AP- 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 218.99 AP 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 21.44 AP 00183564 5/22/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 332.65 AP 00183564 5/22/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF, THE 73.36 AP 00183564 5/22/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF, THE 20.45 AP 00183565 5/22/2002 HONG, SIMON 200.00 AP 00183566 5/22/2002 HOSE MAN1NC 114.00 AP 00183567 5/22/2002 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP- 00183568 5/22/2002 HURST, CHERYL 313.50 AP- 00183569 5/22/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 54.01 AP- 00183570 5/22/2002 ICBO 120.13 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 28 Current Date: 05/28/7: Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183571 5/22/2002 ICBO 50.00 AP - 00183572 5/22/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 193.25 AP - 00183572 5/22/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 130.66 AP - 00183572 5/22/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 601.73 AP- 00183573 5/22/2002 IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 123,990.42 AP- 00183574 5/22/2002 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INC 68.01 AP - 00183574 5/22/2002 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS ]NC 275.00 AP - 00183575 5/22/2002 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 937.07 AP - 00183575 5/22/2002 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,188.77 AP - 00183576 5/22/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 122.73 AP- 00183576 5/22/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 206.66 AP- 00183576 5/22/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 307.90 AP - 00183576 5/22/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 449.16 AP-00183576 5/22/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 133.50 AP - 00183577 5/22/2002 JOJOLA, DOLORES 53.00 AP - 00183578 5/22/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 244.00 AP- 00183579 5/22/2002 KEITH, BARBARA 75.00 AP- 00183580 5/22/2002 KLAUS AND SONS 160.00 AP- 00183581 5/22/2002 KOBAYASHI AND ASSOCIATES 4,607.50 AP - 00183582 5/22/2002 KOLA 3,800.00 AP- 00183583 5/22/2002 KRUSE, JOAN A 740.00 AP - 00183584 5/22/2002 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 10,989.81 AP - 00183585 5/22/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS 1NC 450.25 AP - 00183585 5/22/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 113.04 AP - 00183585 5/22/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC -44.11 AP- 00183586 5/22/2002 LEE, WARREN 266.00 AP- 00183587 5/22/2002 LEON, LUIS 165.00 AP- 00183588 5/22/2002 LIL STITCH 890.10 AP-00183589 5/22/2002 LILBURNCORPORATION 12,385.22 AP-00183589 5/22/2002 LILBURNCORPORATION 360.00 AP - 00183589 5/22/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 352.00 AP - 00183589 5/22/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 792.00 AP - 00183589 5/22/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 4,664.00 AP - 00183590 5/22/2002 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS 1,151.70 AP - 00183590 5/22/2002 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS 500.00 AP - 00183591 5/22/2002 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 7.49 AP - 00183592 5/22/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES [NC. 608.03 AP - 00183593 5/22/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP- 00183594 5/22/2002 LUCKETT ROOFING CO 750.00 AP - 00183595 5/22/2002 M M A S C 165.00 AP - 00183596 5/22/2002 M S A 270.00 AP - 00183597 5/22/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 790.00 AP - 00183598 5/22/2002 MARK CHRIS INC 20.07 AP- 00183599 5/22/2002 MA1LKLEY, JENNIFER 100.00 AP - 00183600 5/22/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 50.00 AP- 00183600 5/22/2002 MART1NEZUNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00183601 5/22/2002 MARTINEZ, JOELLEN 575.00 AP- 00183602 5/22/2002 MARTINEZ, MARICELA 100.00 AP - 00183603 5/22/2002 MATT'S HARDWARE 11.55 AP- 00183604 5/22/2002 MELLIN, JULIE 48.00 AP - 00183605 5/22/2002 MORITA, DUANE 8,818.00 AP - 00183606 5/22/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 77.55 AP - 00183607 5/22/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW INLAND POOL 38.68 AP - 00183608 5/22/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 50.39 User: ahunsber - Am~ Hunsberger Page: 29 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porn'alt Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183609 5/22/2002 MUSIC TALK 36.00 AP - 00183610 5/22/2002 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 13.85 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 96.01 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 56.35 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 46.30 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 137.15 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.25 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.25 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 64.61 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 49.48 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 118.62 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.29 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 99.23 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -12.82 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 134.25 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -23.71 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2.90 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 498.55 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 343.05 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.46 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.51 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.70 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 73.67 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -20.34 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 85.65 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.50 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 94.78 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 162.58 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1.93 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 66.16 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.76 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.01 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 20.53 AP ~ 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS I6.80 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 88.18 AP - 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.15 AP- 00183611 5/22/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -59.87 AP- 00183612 5/22/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,793.86 AP- 00183613 5/22/2002 NEW READERS PRESS 73.29 AP - 00183614 5/22/2002 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 220.00 AP - 00183614 5/22/2002 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 144.00 AP- 00183615 5/22/2002 NITE AND DAYBEDS ETC 89.95 AP- 00183616 5/22/2002 OCLC INC 72.07 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 24.84 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 67.38 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 113.96 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -48.03 AP - 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -37.50 AP - 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -34.79 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -25.00 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -9.05 AP - 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 61.22 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 368.89 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 53.90 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 30 Current Date: 05/28/', Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -21.83 AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -5.52 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 106.07 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 156.62 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 196.80 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 23.40 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 40.10 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.61 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 74.41 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 16.44 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.93 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 58.34 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.51 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -49.86 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 223.62 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 168.58 AP 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 13.45 AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -18.90 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 43.64 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 180.77 AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 243.23 AP - 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 111.11 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 54.89 AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 202.54 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 244.55 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.69 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 14.79 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 461.75 AP- 00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.67 AP-00183618 5/22/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 96.25 AP - 00183619 5/22/2002 OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF COl 1,955.69 AP - 00183620 5/22/2002 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY 325.19 AP- 00183621 5/22/2002 ONSITE COMPANIES INC 101.45 AP- 00183622 5/22/2002 OPEN APPS 380.00 AP - 00183623 5/22/2002 OP-.ANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE INC 10,265.59 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 29.03 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 317.99 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.42 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 55.59 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 271.91 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.91 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10.82 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 123.83 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.32 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 24.91 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.75 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 125.99 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.37 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 241.28 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 53.86 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 215.49 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.74 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 124.12 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.25 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 31 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Yendor Name Amount AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 40.38 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 96.96 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 136.06 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 366.37 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 101.66 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 198.67 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 134.61 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 33.35 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 437.22 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -6.23 AP ~ 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 12.99 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.62 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 102.30 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 92.30 AP- 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.64 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 39.81 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 96.85 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 245.39 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 59.19 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 22.07 AP - 00183625 5/22/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 43.08 AP-00183626 5/22/2002 OTSUKA, DENNIS I00.00 AP - 00183627 5/22/2002 PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING 500.00 AP - 00183628 5/22/2002 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 49,047.42 AP - 00183629 5/22/2002 PAPER DIRECT INC 70.92 AP- 00183629 5/22/2002 PAPER DIRECT INC 64.93 AP- 00183629 5/22/2002 PAPER DIRECT 1NC 64.93 AP- 00183630 5/22/2002 PARENTING PRESS INC 261.49 AP - 00183631 5/22/2002 PERRY, MAKK A 27.00 AP - 00183631 5/22/2002 PERRY, MARK A 42.00 AP- 00183632 5/22/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 85.87 AP- 00183633 5/22/2002 PHOENIXFOODSERVICES 63.40 AP - 00183634 5/22/2002 PHOTOGRAPHY BY KENNETH 40.00 AP- 00183635 5/22/2002 PLUMMER, SUE 40.00 AP- 00183636 5/22/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 173.60 AP- 00183636 5/22/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 283.23 AP - 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 60.51 AP- 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 55.76 AP- 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 380.37 AP - 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 298.94 AP - 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 336.71 AP - 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 245.26 AP- 00183637 5/22/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 255.10 AP- 00183638 5/22/2002 POP, AC 280.00 AP- 00183639 5/22/2002 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION INC 9.81 AP- 00183640 5/22/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 309.69 AP- 00183640 5/22/2002 PREMIER PERSONNEL 399.60 AP- 00183641 5/22/2002 PRINT TO MAIL 563.96 AP - 00183642 5/22/2002 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 99.37 AP- 00183642 5/22/2002 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 93.70 AP- 00183643 5/22/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP- 00183643 5/22/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00183644 5/22/2002 PSOMAS 2,056.06 AP - 00183645 5/22/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 50.64 User: ahunsber- Ami Hunsberger Page: 32 Current Date: 05/28/2 Report:CK_AGENDAREG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 t~rough 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183646 5/22/2002 QUALITY SUITES HOTEL 445.50 AP - 00183647 5/22/2002 QU1NTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 166.26 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 105.04 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 484.72 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 180.59 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 138.36 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 375.85 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 129.80 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND RAUTOMOTIVE 301.69 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 410.75 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 550.53 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00183648 5/22/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP- 00183649 5/22/2002 R H F INC 25.00 AP-00183650 5/22/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 95.00 AP 00183651 5/22/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 38.30 AP 00183652 5/22/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 80.00 AP 00183652 5/22/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 20.00 AP 00183652 5/22/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00 AP 00183653 5/22/2002 RAPID REPAIR SERVICE 1NC 182.27 AP 00183654 5/22/2002 RBM LOCKANDKEY SERVICE 5.00 AP 00183655 5/22/2002 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 92.70 AP 00183656 5/22/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP 00183657 5/22/2002 REDINGER, TOM 46.00 AP 00183658 5/22/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP 00183659 5/22/2002 RHICONSULTING 1,024.00 AP 00183660 5/22/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 215.80 AP 00183661 5/22/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP 00183662 5/22/2002 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 811.43 AP 00183663 5/22/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 58.50 AP 00183664 5/22/2002 ROLDAN, KIMBERLY 15.00 AP 00183665 5/22/2002 ROTARY CORPORATION 146.36 AP 00183666 5/22/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 314.45 AP - 00183667 5/22/2002 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 315.53 AP - 00183668 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68 AP - 00183669 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 200.00 AP - 00183670 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 76,989.80 AP - 00183670 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 14,193.33 AP - 00183670 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 931,997.87 AP - 00183671 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 264.24 AP- 00183672 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 154.14 AP- 00183672 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 154.14 AP - 00183673 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 210.00 AP - 00183674 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 250.00 AP - 00I 83675 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 50,000.00 AP - 00183676 5/22/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 300.00 AP - 00183677 5/22/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 191.80 AP - 00183677 5/22/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 187.49 AP - 00183677 5/22/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 249.98 AP - 00183678 5/22/2002 SANDOVAL, ERMA 40.00 AP - 00183679 5/22/2002 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 477.88 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 33 Current Date: 05/28/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00183680 5/22/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION [NC 8,537.77 AP 00183681 5/22/2002 SMART AND F1NAL 35.37 AP 00183681 5/22/2002 SMART AND F[NAL 161.37 AP 00183681 5/22/2002 SMART AND F[NAL 22.77 AP 00183681 5/22/2002 SMART AND FINAL 566.94 AP 00183682 5/22/2002 SO CAL FIRE PREVENTION OFFICERS 300.00 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.10 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.79 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 501.82 AP- 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.77 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.71 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 404.69 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.34 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.95 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.85 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 471.65 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 918.09 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.04 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.23 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,219.88 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,309.93 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.65 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.99 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORN1A EDISON 98.40 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.70 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.59 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.38 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.34 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 447.49 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 467.09 AP 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.30 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.99 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.24 AP ~ 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00183684 5/22/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.69 AP - 00183685 5/22/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 49.65 AP - 00183686 5/22/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 5,842.73 AP - 00183687 5/22/2002 STEEVE CITY 25.17 AP - 00183688 5/22/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00 AP- 00183689 5/22/2002 SUNRISE FORD 192.68 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 34 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00183689 5/22/2002 SUNRISE FORD 70.24 AP 00183689 5/22/2002 SUNRISE FORD 19.58 AP 00183689 5/22/2002 SUNRISE FORD 39.40 AP 00183689 5/22/2002 SUNRISE FORD 134.43 AP 00183690 5/22/2002 SURFCONTROLINC 434.93 AP 00183691 5/22/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 250.00 AP 00183692 5/22/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS -306.66 AP 00183692 5/22/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,366.98 AP 00183692 5/22/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS -193.30 AP 00183692 5/22/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 615.73 AP 00183693 5/22/2002 TARGET 311.93 AP - 00183693 5/22/2002 TARGET 55.12 AP 00183693 5/22/2002 TARGET 25.50 AP 00183694 5/22/2002 TEES PLUS 413.40 AP 00183695 5/22/2002 TETRA TECH ASL INC 3,450.00 AP 00183696 5/22/2002 TIDEMARK COMPUTERS SYSTEMS1NC 22,440.02 AP 00183697 5/22/2002 TOMARK SPORTS INC 519.37 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 5,044.48 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 26,650.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 52,718.43 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,297.14 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREENLANDCARE REGIONAL 986.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 11,628.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 20,249.83 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 837.54 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,496.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 466.73 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 59.66 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 7,293.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 10,299.69 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 416.99 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 3,410.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCAREREGIONAL 5,838.00 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 13,823.86 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,005.83 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 47.13 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 14,247.58 AP 00183698 5/22/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,128.00 AP 00183699 5/22/2002 TURNER, DAVID 100.00 AP 00183700 5/22/2002 U S POSTMASTER 4,700.00 AP - 00183701 5/22/2002 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 28.75 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 80.25 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 216.80 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 19.91 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 31.10 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.41 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 70.03 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 19.91 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 586.30 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.41 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 126.20 AP - 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 78.63 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.41 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.38 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 35 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIF1RSTUNIFORM SERVICE 19.91 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIF1RSTUNIFORM SERVICE 541.42 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 125.22 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 155.59 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIF1RSTUNIFORM SERVICE 22.41 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 36.41 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 577.77 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 23.28 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 23.38 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 121.47 AP- 00183702 5/22/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 524.40 AP- 00183703 5/22/2002 UNISTRUT 3,978.04 AP- 00183704 5/22/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 37.18 AP - 00183704 5/22/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 48.79 AP- 00183705 5/22/2002 UNITED TRAFFIC 296.31 AP- 00183705 5/22/2002 UNITED TRAFFIC 215.50 AP- 00183706 5/22/2002 UNITED WAY 628.32 AP - 00183707 5/22/2002 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 11,650.58 AP- 00183708 5/22/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 24,158.48 AP-00183709 5/22/2002 VANTECH 584.41 AP - 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.32 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.59 AP - 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 146.96 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 64.46 AP - 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 59.71 AP-00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 99.40 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.07 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.11 AP-00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.32 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.14 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.71 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.24 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.71 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 26.38 AP- 00183710 5/22/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 22.24 AP - 00183711 5/22/2002 VERMEER CALIFORNIA 190.07 AP- 00183712 5/22/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00 AP- 00183713 5/22/2002 VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI 27.74 AP- 00183714 5/22/2002 VILLEGAS, TONY 300.00 AP-00183715 5/22/2002 VILLEGAS, TONY 300.00 AP- 00183716 5/22/2002 VISTA PA1NT 91.59 AP- 00183717 5/22/2002 VL SYSTEMS [NC 275.00 AP- 00183718 5/22/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00183719 5/22/2002 WAMSLEY, DONNA 9.13 AP - 00183720 5/22/2002 WATER TECHNIQUES 531.43 AP- 00183721 5/22/2002 WEST CONCRETE 250.00 AP - 00183722 5/22/2002 WEST VALLEY MRE LLC 5,369.76 AP- 00183723 5/22/2002 WEST, AMBER 47.82 AP- 00183724 5/22/2002 WILLIAM LYON HOMES INC 7,550.00 AP- 00183724 5/22/2002 WILLIAM LYON HOMES INC 6,300.00 AP - 00183725 5/22/2002 WILSON, BRITT 36.26 AP- 00183725 5/22/2002 WILSON, BRITT 41.00 AP- 00183725 5/22/2002 WILSON, BRITT 7.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 36 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REGPORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/8/2002 through 5/28/2002 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00183725 5/22/2002 WILSON, BRITT 45.00 AP- 00183725 5/22/2002 WILSON, BRITT 24.48 AP- 00183726 5/22/2002 YEE, LARRY 36.00 AP - 00183727 5/22/2002 YOUTH EDUCATIONAL SPORTS INC 600.00 AP - 00183728 5/22/2002 YWCA OF THE WEST END 485.85 AP- 00183729 5/22/2002 ZWlSSLER, JAMES 70.00 AP- 00183746 5/23/2002 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 210.90 AP- 00183792 5/23/2002 4 ACE CONSTRUCTION 9,485.00 AP- 00183794 5/28/2002 GREEN, TRACY 38.00 Total for Check ID AP: 2,978,256.66 Total for Entity: 2,978,256.66 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 37 Current Date: 05/28/5 Report:CK AGENDA PEG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:4 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: WiIham J. O Ne~l, C~ty Englnee BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer(~. SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ,~'EI~TISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1022170 AND AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF ACCOUNT NUMBER 11823035650/1022182 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: The scope of work for Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay for various local streets consists of, but not limited to weed killing and removal, crack sealing, grinding, asphalt overlay and striping. The project will be funded from Measure I and Traffic Congestion Relief funds, Account No. 11763035650/1022170 and 11823035650/1022182. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate is $495,900. Legal advertising is scheduled for June 11, 2002 and June 18, 2002, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday June 25, 2002. Res p/ec~ully submitted, vvillia[~J. O'Neil City E~gineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachments LOCATION MAP I Fu.~'-,~. i~EL.~_~...~i i ........................................................................................................ ~ ~"-" ,.J ~ ~ ~ ,/.,,,~ = ~~.. ~ CI~ 0F RANCH0 CUc~ONOA 2002/0~ PAYMENT REHABIMTATION LOCAL STREET A.C. OVER~YS RESOLUTION NO. O~" / 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND ALrI'HORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEWE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fit~y dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained fi.om the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as mended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or pemaitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered fi.om a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cueamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. Page 5 Dated this 5th day of June, 2002 Publish Dates: June 11, 2002 and June 18, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, this 5th day of June, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the COUNCIL DATE. Executed this 5th day of June, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: June 11, 2002 and June 18, 2002 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N Gl N ~' E DIN G DI~ PAI~ TM E N T $ Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer FROM: James T. Harris, Associate Enginee~L~--- Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~an:~) SUBJECT: REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS AT 19TM STREET (SR30) AND JASPER STREET AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AND AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR NEW BIDS FOR THE IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS AT 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council reject all bids received for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th Street (SR30) and Jasper Street as non-responsive to the needs of the City and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for new bids for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th Street and Jasper Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 21, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's Estimate was $30,000.00. The only bid received $65,680.00, exceeded the Engineer's Estimate. Staff seeks permission to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for new bids at this time. Res~.ctfully submitted, Willi~n')/J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH/RO Attachment ~; HAn-t ~ORN£ 5-r ~ R2 tgTa STREET (sR-3o) SCHOOl- ' R2 6 ~ GALA AV J~PER ~r~: ELEMENTARY ~ ~ ~o~usm~ s,~. SCHOOL 1 ~Sn~ ~HING e~CONS FIGURE "A" BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 14, 2002 IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS AT 19TH STREET (SR30) AND ENGINEERS COST JASPER STREET ESTIMATE L.A. Signal, Inc. UNIT UNIT 'NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. ~ 1 LS bt-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th St. and Jasper St. $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $65,680.00 $65,680.00 TOTALI $30,000.00 $65,680.00 Page 1 RESOLUTION /~/~. OZ-/ ¢/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "IN- ROADWAY WARNING LIGHT SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET, FEDERAL AID PROJECT STPLHSR-5420(007)" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has caused to be prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHT SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 2, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHT SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET" in said City. A pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on June 20, 2002, at 10500 Civic Center Ddve. This meeting is to inform DBE's of subcontracing and material supply opportunities. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for demonstrating reasonable efforts to obtain DBE participation. This meeting will also be used to explain the construction procedures of the work. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the IN- ROADWAY WARNING LIGHT SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TM STREET AND JASPER STREET". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the execution of the contract for this project the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLl_ARS)to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at RESOLUTION NO. Page 5 the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 5th day of June, 2002. Publish Dates: June 11 and June 18, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 5th day of June, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of February, 2002. Executed this 5th day of June, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: June 11 and June 18, 2002 TH *CITY OF ~^NCIIO CETCAI~I 0 N GA Sta Ret: DATE: June 5, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that authorizes staff to apply for grant funds for the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 is intended to revive state stewardship of natural resources by investing in neighborhood parks and state parks, clean water protection and coastal beaches and scenic areas. Under that Act, the Per Capita Program was established to meet the urgent need for safe, open and accessible local park and recreational facilities for increased recreational opportunities that provide positive alternatives to social problems. The Per Capita Program has been allocated $388,000,000 that can only be used for capital outlay. There are no matching requirements under this Program. The Program's Procedural Guidelines states that the $388,000,000 shall be allocated based upon population with the minimum allocation for cities and other eligible agencies being $30,000. Accordingly, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was allocated $1,139,000 based upon its population. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION FOR GRANT FUNDS June 5, 2002 Page 2 The performance pedod for the Per Capita Program is July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2008. Cities and other eligible agencies must have a fully executed Contract with the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation by June 30, 2003. All qualifying projects must be completed with final documentation submitted to the State by March 1, 2008. All grant funds that have not been expended by the cities and other eligible agencies shall revert back to the Bond Act fund and be available for appropriation by the State Legislature for one or more of the categories that the State Legislature determines to be of the highest priority statewide. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 02 - / ~,¢~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Per Capita Grant Program which provides funds to meet the urgent need for safe, open and accessible local park and recreational facilities for increased recreational opportunities that provide positive alternatives to social problems; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of the Applicant to apply for the Per Capita Allocation, and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance funds from the Per Capita Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and 2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the projects; and 3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to Applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of projects. Approved and Adopted on the 5~ day of June, 2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner StJBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that authorizes staff to apply for grant funds for the Robert-Z'Berg-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and : Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: The purpose of the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris (RZH) Urban Open Space and Recreation Program is to fund high priority projects that satisfy the most urgent park and recreational needs in California, with emphasis on unmet needs in the most heavily populated and most economically disadvantaged areas within each jurisdiction. Local governments in urbanized areas, such as Rancho Cucamonga, receive the greatest portion (83%) of the total program funds as block grants that are allocated on the basis of population. The remaining 17% of the available funds from the RZH program are for Need-Basis Grants (competitive, Project-by-Project) for both urbanized and nonurbanized local agencies. Eligible types of projects include acquisition, development/rehabilitation, and special major maintenance. A special major maintenance project means a rehabilitation or refurbishing activity performed on an annual or more infrequent interval, excluding capital improvements and routinized or other regularly scheduled and performed tasks such as grounds mowing, hedge CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION FOR RZH PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS June 5, 2002 Page 2 trimming, garbage removal and watering. Special major maintenance includes activities that will reduce energy requirements to operate recreational lands or facilities. The RZH Program provides $200 million that is intended to supplement, and not to supplant, local expenditures for park and recreation facilities. The allocation for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $365,702. The Program does require a 30°,~ local match utilizing nonstate monies. The Program's performance period is from July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2009. Cities and other eligible agencies must have a fully executed Contract with the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation by June 30, 2004. All eligible projects must be completed with final documentation submitted to the State by March 1, 2009. All grant funds that have not been expended by the City shall revert back to the Bond Act fund and be available for appropriation by the State Legislature for one or more of the categories that the State Legislature determines to be of the highest pdority statewide. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 02 - / '~'..~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 which provides funds for the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Open Space and Recreation Program; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Califomia has enacted the Roberti- Z'Berg-Harris Open Space and Recreation Program, which provides funds to certain political subdivisions of the State of California for acquiring lands and for developing facilities to meet urban recreational needs; and WHEREAS, the Califomia Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of the Applicant to apply for the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris allocation; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance funds from the Roberti- Z'Berg-Hards Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and 2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and · maintain the projects; and Resolution 02- June 5, 2002 3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of projects. Approved and Adopted on the 5~ day of June, 2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council following a roll call vote: Ayes Noes Absent City Clerk R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEDART~IENT DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 13527, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND CERVANTES PLACE SUBMI'I-I'ED BY GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION AND MASTERCRAFT-CUCAMONGA II, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13527, accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 13527, located at the northwest corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 1988, for the division of 88 acres into 252 single family lots. Four previous final maps have recorded: Tract 14379, 14380, 14381 and 14382. This is the fifth and final tract map for the tentative map. The Developer, MasterCraft-Cucamonga II, LLC and General Electric Capital Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $1,714,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 857,200.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13527 June 5, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Willii~m j~O,N ell City Engineer WJO:HM:sc Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~,, ITEM: Tract 13527 ENGINEERING DIVISION ~tg,~D EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. O 2 ' /7 q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 13527, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13527, submitted by Terry Melcher and consisting of 252 lots located at the northwest comer of Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 28, 1988, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 13527 is the fifth of five final maps of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by General Electric Capital Corporation and MasterCraft-Cucamonga 1I, LLC, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 13527 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~) 2 - / 7~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND ? FOR TRACT 13527 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, tins previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property with'm the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 13527 June 5, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as proscribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the T~rritory in mounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is:. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13527, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20 AND THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1885. EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 150 FEET OF SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SAID SECTION 20. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SOUTHERN SURPLUS REALITY CO., BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1973, IN BOOK 8281, PAGE 144, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONDEMNED TO THE SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL D1STRICT BY FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1979, IN BOOK 9785, PAGE 1107, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE NORTH ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTH ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20, NORTH 89 DEG. 25' 31" WEST, 104.06 FEET TO A POINT OF CUSP ON A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1006.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 70 DEG. 05' 48" EAST; THENCE TRAVERSING THE INTERIOR OF SAID NORTH ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: Exhibit "A" continued (1) NORTHERLY 19.59 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEG. 06' 57" TO A NON-TANGENT LINE TO WHICH A RADIAL L1NE BEARS SOUTH 71 DEG. 12' 45" EAST; (2) NORTH 89 DEG. 40' 00" WEST, 130.49 FEET; (3) NORTH 87 DEG. 37' 00" WEST, 331.63 FEET; (4) NORTH 89 DEG. 00' 00" WEST, 280.00 FEET; (5) SOUTH 87 DEG. 30' 00" WEST, 102.14 FEET; (6) SOUTH 89 DEG. 18' 00" WEST, 185.04 FEET; (7) SOUTH 87 DEG. 00' 00" WEST, 91.66 FEET; (8) SOUTH 89 DEG. 30' 00" WEST, 84.32 FEET; (9) SOUTH 07 DEG. 30' 00" EAST, 13.79 FEET SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID sOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 89 DEG. 25' 31" WEST, 49.78 FEET; THENCE TRAVERSING THE INTERIOR OF SAID NORTH V2 OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: (1) NORTH 22 DEG. 00' 00" EAST, 16.08 FEET; (2) sOUTH 89 DEG. 52' 00" WEST, 303.06 FEET; (3) SOUTH 00 DEG. 34' 30" WEST, 11.23 FEET TO SAiD SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89 DEG. 25' 31" WEST, 60.00 FEET; THENCE TRAVERSING THE INTERIOR OF SAID NORTH ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES; (1) NORTH 00 DEG. 34' 30" EAST, 11.61 FEET; (2) SOUTH 88 DEG. 10' 00" WEST, 95.90 FEET; (3) NORTH 89 DEG. 41' 00" WEST, 560.56 FEET; (4) SOUTH 44 DEG. 44' 04" WEST, 7.05 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89 DEG. 25' 31" WEST, 62.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SURPLUS REALTY CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 17, 1973, IN BOOK 8163, PAGE 17, OFFIC1AL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM TRACT NO. 14379, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, cOUNTY OF SAN BEKNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 246, OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 57 TO 61, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM TRACT NO. 14380, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 246 OF MAPS, PAGES(S) 62 TO 67 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM TRACT NO. 14381, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 276 OF MAPS, PAGES(S) 17 TO 21 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM TRACT NO. 14382, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECOI~DED IN BOOK 280 OF MAPS, PAGES(S) 48 TO 52 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXIST~G L~ ~AS: Wilson Avenue ~ontage ~d medi~ e~t of Ce~tes; Etiw~da Avenue frontages; Co~i~ Tr~ ~d leRered lots ~ Tracts 14380 ~d 14381 PROPOSED L~ ~AS: Wilson Avenue ~on~ge ~d me~ west of Ce~tes; Ce~mtes to first ~terior s~eet; one levered lot in Tract 13527 ~d tempor~ basin l~dscaping, inclu~ng Tejas Co~ ~onmge NORTH ~ 1"=400' '4~CITY OF ITEM: Tract 13527 RANCHO CUCAMONGA tq ' ~ TITLE: Assessment Diagram ENOINEERiNO DIVISION EXHIBIT: LIVID 7, SLD 1, SLD 7 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, Community Trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maimenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT ~ANCE DISTRICt NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north &Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 13527 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 .... 9 .......... SLD # 7 -20 ............. Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 7 ...... 46,390 263 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 7 L 7 45 DU 45 45 45 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICF NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 1314 1.00 1314 $307.05 $403,464.00 Family Comm/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $ 3,071.00 TOTAL $406,535.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 35 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $13,817.25 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 ,and 1 l~e 1 Init Tyne l/nit~ 11nit~ Factor I Jnit~ 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Family Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 13527) is: 45 Parcels x I A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $799.65 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" continued S~REE~ LIGHT ~ANCE D~C~ NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessmem 1 ,and 1 l~e 1 lnlt Tyne ! ]nita 1 lnits Fnatnr ! [nit~ 1 Init Revenue Single Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454.00 Family Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 13527) is: 45 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,499.40 Annual Assessment ¢-2 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT 13527 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O"NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALII~ORNIA. That on the 28th day of May, 2002, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of ail of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 28th day of May, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RAN HO C U C A M O N G a ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Slaf:f Re rt DATE: June fi, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND iMPROVEMENT SECURITY (TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, ELLENA WEST) FOR TRACT MAP NO. 16263, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ELLENA WEST, SUBMI-I-rED BY KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the subject agreement and security, ordering and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS Tentative Tract Map No. 16263, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Ellena West, in the Medium High Density District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 13, 2002, for a residential subdivision of 204 townhouse dwellings on 14.6 acres of land. The Tract Map, improvement security for Base Line Road, and the annexation to Street Light and Landscape Maintenance Districts were approved by City Council on May 15 2002. The Developer, KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $33,316.00 Labor and Material Bond: $16,950.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. 75 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16263 June 5,2002 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer VVJO:HM:sc Attachments VICINITY MAP L' ~OJECT II i1 II .... VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 77 RESOLUTION NO. t~),~. - / 7~:~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY (TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ELLENA WEST) FOR TRACT 16263 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16263, submitted by KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc., located on the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Ellena West, being a division of 204 townhouse dwellings on 14.6 acres of land in the Medium High Density District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on March 13, 2002, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16263 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc. as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Maintenance and Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., INC. The legal description of the property is: THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16263, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 15453, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 191 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 26 TO 28, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS, HYDROCARBONS AND KINDRED SUBSTANCES LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS GRANTED TO WESTERN SUPPLY CORP. BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1979, IN BOOK 9772, PAGE 1262, OFFICIAL RECORDS. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 16263 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ............... SLD # 4 ............... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 4 ......... :27 (Ellena West) 19 (T. Vista Pkwy) *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 4 L 4 --- 204 204 204 204 I H E C I Y Y 0 F I~AN Cf1 0 CU CAI~I 0 N GA Staff Report DAI'~: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J, O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 14459 LOCATED IN LEMON AVENUE FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO LONDON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY ALTA LOMA I AND II, JOINT VENTURE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract No. 14459, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and .to cause same to record. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tract No. 14459, the developer, Alta Loma I and II, Joint Venture, was required to install a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility located in Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to London Avenue. The storm drain facilities have been completed by the developer and accepted by the City. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14459- REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT June 6, 2002 Page 2 The developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of said Master Planned Storm Drain Facility. Staff has reviewed and verified the submittal. The amount due the developer is $319,233.00. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sc Attachment EXHIBIT "A" Master Plan Storm Drain Lemon Avenue Reimbursements For Tract No. 14459 Engineering Design/Survey: Charles Abbott Associates, Inc ................................................. $ 2,852.00 Soil Testing: .......................................................... $ 9,400.00 Construction: E & R Construction Co .............................................................. $298,414.00 Other Costs: Processing Fee ......................................................................... $ 2,227.00 Plan Check Fee ........................................................................ _$ 6,340.00 Total Costs .................................................................................................. $319,233.00 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT SUM ................................................................ $319,233.00 EXI--tlBIT "J~" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT }{ASTER PLAN STORH DRAIN FACILITY NO.' IN LEHON AVENUE FROH LONDON AVENUE EAST TO THE ALTA LOHA CHANN~.',n RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT OF A PORTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN INSTALLED IN LEMON AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Alta Loma I and II, Joint Venture, developer, for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility, located in Lemon Avenue from Amhibald Avenue to Lemon Avenue, of Tract No. 14459; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has cornpleted said storm drain installation; and WHEREAS, the developer at the time of issuance of the building permits, has or will receive fee credit from the drainage fees for the amount as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. R ^ N H O C U C ^ M O N G A E N G lin E E R IN G D E PAR TItlE N T Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~,~ SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE a CONTRACT FOR THE COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING AND PCC CURB ALONG SUMMIT AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ALONG HILLSIDE TRAIL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD WEST OF BERYL STREET, 'TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1087110-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to negotiate a contract for the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb along Summit Trail at the south side of Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road west of Beryl Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 11103165650/1087110-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited; however, no bids were received at the May 21, 2002 Bid Opening for the subject project. The Engineer's Estimate was $30,451.00. Pursuant to the Public Contract Code, when no bids are received, City Council may authorize City staff to negotiate a contract. Staff will return to Council with a recommendation regarding the results of negotiation. Re~:~e~?ly submitted, Willia~J~. O'Nefl City Engineer WJO:MP/RO Attachment HILLSIDE& SUMMIT COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING North & South Side of Hillside Road West of Beryl Street South Side of Summit Avenue East of Etlwanda Avenue SITE MAP PROJECT .SITES ~ ..- Heritage. Park ,, L.T= ~'/ Hillside Ave N'~ Wilson Ave N~ To Scale Banyan Street Summit Ave Rt 210 J Highland ~.venue 19th Street ~, ~= = _> = = o ~ -r Q UJ Base Une Road Foothill Boulevard m. prescher 4/11/02 ~-~, ¥/ R A N C h O C U C ^ M O N GA ENGINEERING D E PAR TItlE N T Staff Report DATE: June fi, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engine,,~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tecf:~_jcian~,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $539,203.61 ($490,185.10 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION- SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX 2105 / PROPOSITION 111 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11703035650/1022170- 0, AND APPROPRIATE $240,000.00 FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1022176-0 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $539,203.61 ($490,185.10 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, California Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc., for the construction of the Local Street Rehabilitation-Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax 2105 / Proposition 111 Funds, Account No. 11703035650/1022170-0, and appropriate $240,000.00 from Measure I Fund Balance, Account No. 11763035650/1022176-0 for the construction of said project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 21, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $515,075.00 ($468,249.70 plus 10% contingency). Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-SLURRY SEAL June 5,2002 Page 2 accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachments BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 21, 2002 .4PPARENTLOWBIDDER California Pavement Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Slurry Seal of ENGINEERS COST Maintenance Company, Various Streets ESTIMATE Inc. UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Rubberized Slurry Seal Type II including crack- 1. 485833 SY scaling, protectionofexistingsurveymonumcnts, $0.90 $437,249.7( $0.9575 $465,185.1( manholes, valve covers, etc., restxiping and ~avement markings and pneumatic rolling 2. 1 . LS Traffic Contxol $31,000.00 $31,000.0( $25,000.00 $25,000.0( TOTAL $468,249.7{I $490,185.1{1 Page I LOCATION MAP ~ ,~- . .~/' --( y · ~ ~ ~I0 CI~ OF R~C"0 CUC~ONGA ~ 2001/02 PAYMENT RE~II.TTATI()N~ s~u~ ss~ e~o~ ,.,.,. ~/~ R A N H O C U C A, M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 20, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Dale Catron, City Facilities Supervisor SUI/dtL-T: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $68,700.00 (PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY OF $6,870.00) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TOBIN CONSTRUCTION OF ALTA LOMA FROM ACCOUNTS 1120305-5650 AND 1120305-5602 AND AUTHORIZE AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION OF $47,520.00 FROM FUN[) 1120305-5602 FOR THE PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution ora contract in tlie amount of $68,700.00 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Tobin Construction of Alta Loma from accounts 1120305-5650 and 1120305-5602 and authorize an additional appropriation of $47,520.00 bom fund 1120305-5602 for the Park Trash Enclosures. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Thursday, May 16, 2002 (see attached Bid Summary). The Engineer's estimate for this project was $44,000.00, therefore, staff is requesting additional funding to complete this project. Staff has reviewed all bid documents and found Tobin Construction to be the lowest responsive bidder. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:DC:ju Bid Abstract for Park TraSh Enclosures Name Amount Doc's Bid Bond Tobin Construction 68,700 Yes Yes Jeff Merrick Construction 99,000 Yes Yes R.Fox Construction, Inc. 118,052 Yes Yes KCE Company 118,660 Yes Yes RAN C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT St Reporl: DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CCWD LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE U-rlLIZATION OF EXISTING POWER POLE LOCATED ON HYDRO PLANT AT RESERVOIR 6 AND THE ROYER-NESBIT WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR LOCAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve CCWD agreement (Attached) for the utilization of existing power pole located on Hydro Plant at Reservoir 6 and the Royar-Nesbit Water Treatment Plant for local radio communications equipment installation with an associated annual fee of $1.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This agreement with CCWD will allow access for the installation and maintenance of City-owned radio repeaters at two protected CCWD well sites that are geographically suited for citywide radio communication coverage. Radios are the primary communication device utilized for data transfer between the City's central computer and our Calsense water management irrigation controllers in the field. Local radio is two-way communication by City-owned devices, within a frequency assigned by the FCC. This new local radio technology will eventually eliminate the monthly fees now associated with the contract communications carrier. Local radio is now thc new City Standard in all Developer and City landscape censtruction projects. The city attorney has reviewed and approved this agreement. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WlO:JB:dlw LEASE AGREEMENT LANDLORD: Cucamonga County Water Dislxict Attn: Robert DeLoach 10440 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 TENANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Mayor William Alexander 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 PREMISES: Land Lease (Premises) Existing power pole and Hydro Plant at Reservoir 6 And the Royer-Nesbit Water Treatment Plant TERM OF LEASE: Thirty (30) years COMMENCEMENT DATE OF LEASE: July 1, 2002 COST: $1.00 per year TABLE OF CONTENTS SEL~iiON PAGE 1. PARTIES ......................................................................................................... 3 2. PREMISES LEASED ...................................................................................... 3 3. TERM .............................................................................................................. 3 4. RENT ............................................................................................................... 3 5. HOLDING OVER ........................................................................................... 3 6. USE ................................................................................................................. 4 7. MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................ 4 8. ALTERATIONS ......................................................... 4 9. FIXTURES ...................................................................................................... 4 10. INDEMNITY .................................................................................................. 4 11. CITY'S ACCESS TO PREMISES .................................................................. 5 12. LANDLORD'S ACCESS TO PREMISES ...................................................... 5 13. NOTICES ........................................................................................................ 5 14. INCORPORATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT ............................................ 5 15. WAIVERS ....................................................................................................... 5 16. AMENDMENTS ............................................................................................. 6 17. SUCCESSORS ................................................................................................ 6 18. SEVERABILITY ............................................................................................ 6 19. PROVISIONS ARE COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS ............................ 6 20. LAW ................................................................................................................ 6 21. CAPTIONS, TABLE OF CONTENTS AND COVER PAGE ....................... 6 22. SURVIVAL ..................................................................................................... 6 SIGNATURES ................................................................................................ 6 EXHIBIT "A"--RESERVOIR 6 LOCATED AT THE TOP OF ARCHIBALD ..~. ........................................................................... 7 EXHIBIT "B" ROYER-NESBIT WATER TREATMENT PLANT LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ............ 8 LEASE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES This lease is made between thc Cucamonga County Water District ("LANDLOI~D"), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CITY), who agree as follows: 2. PREMISES LEASED LANDLORD leases to CITY and CITY leases from LANDLORD space on power pole and space in Hydro Plant and other improvements located at LANDLORD'S Reservoir 6 and Royer-Nesbit Water Treatment Plant further depicted and described hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B ("premises") for proposes as described in Section 6 of this Agreement. Refer to Section 11 of this Agreement for provisions regarding CITY'S access to the premises. 3. TERM This lease shall be for a period of thirty (30) years ("initial term"), commencing on July 1, 2002. CITY shall have the first option to lease the premises for three (3) additional 10- year option terms following the end of the initial term. In the event that CITY desires to exercise this option, within ninety (90) days of the end of the initial term, CITY shall notify LANDLORD of its intent to exercise the first ten (10) year option. In the event the CITY desires to exercise the second option, it shall likewise notify LANDLORD within ninety (90) days of the end of the first option term. Similarly, in the event that CITY determines to exercise the third option term, it shall notify LANDLORD within (90) days of the end of the second option. In the event that CITY determines to exercise any option hereunder, all such terms and conditions hereof shall continue throughout such term. CITY may terminate lease with thirty (30) days prior written notice to LANDLORD. LANDLORD may terminate lease with thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. 4. RENT CITY shall pay to LANDLORD the following annual rental payment on each annual anniversary date, commencing when the term commences, continuing during the t,~rm for each site described hereto. July 1 through June 30 - annual payments of $1.00. Rent for any partial year shall be paid for the whole year. All rent shall be paid to LANDLORD at the address to which notices to LANDLORD are given. 5. HOLDING OVER In the event the CITY shall hold over and continue to occupy the premises with the consent of the LANDLORD, expressed or implied, the tenancy shall be deemed to be a tenancy from month-to-month upon the same terms and conditions, including rent, as existed and prevailed at the time of the expiration of the term of this lease. 6. USE CITY shall occupy and use the premises during the term hereof for the purpose of CITY communications, including without limitation a CITY radio and transmittal/reception facility operating in the 453 MHz to 512 MHz band along with a telephone line and modem installed at CITY expense. The CITY may install, repair or replace all necessary utilities subject to approval by LANDLORD. LANDLORD will be responsible for all utility costs. 7. MAINTENANCE CITY at its cost shall maintain the premises in good condition. 8. ALTERATIONS LANDLORD has consented to the anticipated CITY facility on the premises. CITY shall not make any additional structural or exterior improvements or alterations to the premises without LANDLORD'S consent. Any such alterations made may remain on and be surrendered with the premises on expiration or termination of the term unless LANDLORD requests their removal upon termination of the term. All impmw~ments and alterations shall conform to all ordinances, law, fire rules, fire insurance requirements and limitations applicable to the premises. 9. FIXTURES CITY shall have the right during the terms of this lease to install fixtures, and make interior, non-structural improvements or alterations in the premises. All fixtures and improvements shall remain the property of the CITY and may be removed by thc CITY during the term of the lease. Notwithstanding the forgoing, in the event that any improvement to the property is not removed by CITY during the term of the lease, it shall at the end of the term of the lease be turned over to LANDLORD and become LANDLORD'S property. The primary purpose and intent of the parties hereto is that CITY'S equipment and communications facilities (i.e., antennas) be deemed trade fixtures which CITY may alter or remove from the premises without interference from the LANDLORD during the term hereof. 10. INDEMINTY CITY shall indemnify and save LANDLORD from any and all claims and liability, including injury (or death) to any person (including employees of CITY), contamination to premises or adjacent land arising from toxic materials or other contaminant sources, and damage to any property, howsoever arising from CITY'S presence, occupancy, or use of the premises or any improvement thereon. Said indemnification shall include payment of all costs of defense, investigation, and reasonable attorney fees. LANDLORD shall indemnify and save CITY from any and all claims and liability, including injury (or death) to any person (including employees of LANDLORD), contamination to premises or adjacent land arising from toxic materials or other contaminant sources, and damage to any property, howsoever arising from LANDLORD'S presence, occupancy, or use of the premises or any improvement thereon. Said indemnification shall include payment of all costs of defense, investigation, and reasonable attorney fees. If access to the premises is not secured by LANDLORD (or its agents) and daraage or injury of CITY property, employees or agents occurs as a result of this act or omission, LANDLORD shall repair or replace any of CITY's personal property which is a result of this act or omission. If access to the premises is not secured by CITY (or its agents) and damage or injury of LANDLORD's property, employees or agents occurs as a result of this act or omission, CITY shall repair or replace any of LANDORD's personal property which is a result of this act or omission. 11. CITY ACCESS TO PREMISES CITY and its authorized representatives shall have the right of access to the premises through the LANDLORD'S land at all times, using the most direct access roadway. CITY shall provide their own lock for insertion in chain for passage beyond the Re~.~ervoir 6 and Royer-Nesbit Water Treatment Plant gate. 12. LANDLORD'S ACCESS TO PREMISES LANDLORD has the right of access to the premises and shall conduct its activities on the premises in a manner that will cause the lease possible inconvenience, annoyance, or disturbance to CITY. 13. NOTICES Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to giw.' to the other party shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated four (4) calendar days from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this paragraph. LANDLORD'S address: Cucamonga County Water District 10440 Ashford Street P.O. Box 638 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY'S address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 14. INCORPORATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT This lease contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this lease, and no prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any other purpose. 15. WAIVERS No waiver by either party of any provisions of this lease shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by either party of the same or any other provisions. 16. AMENDMENTS No provision of this lease may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto or their respective successor in interest, expressing by its terms an intention to modify this lease. 17. SUCCESSORS This lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. 18. SEVERABILITY If any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article, part or portion of this lease is or shall be invalid for any reason, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder hereof and shall in no way affect or impair the validity of this lease or any other portion thereof. 19. PROVISIONS ARE COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS All provisions, whether covenants or conditions, on the part of either party shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions. LAW This lease shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 21. CAPTIONS, TABLE OF CONTENTS AND COVER PAGE The paragraph captions, table of contents and the cover page of this lease shall have no effect on its interpretations. 22. SURVIVAL The obligations of the parties which, by their nature, continue beyond the term if this lease, will survive the termination of this lease. END OF LEASE TERMS City of Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga County Water District By:. By: Title: Mayor Title: General Manager/CEO Dated: Dated: Attest: Attest: THE CITY OF SlaffReport DA'I'~: June 5, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer SUBJECT: Approval to award a professional services agreement to Conrad Business Services, Inc. (CO 02-047) in the amount of $38,080 to perform an inventory and valuation of the City's infrastructure assets in accordance with the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 34 to be funded by the Capital Reserve Fund account number 1025001-5300. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Conrad Business Services, Inc. to perform an inventory and valuation of the City's infrastructure assets in accordance with the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 34. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), the body that sets accounting standards for governments in the United States, in 1999 approved their Statement Ne. 34. This statement is the most significant change to governmental accounting rules during the last 30 years. The pr. onouncement will make major changes to the content and format of annual financial statements for governments. The new presentation will be more consistent with the rules followed by private enterprise, but most of the previous presentations will also be retained. The City is required to implement this standard for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. One of the major changes to the City's financial statements will be the incorporation of the City's fixed assets into the main financial report. In order to prepare for this reporting requirement, staff previously contracted for a general fixed asset (land, buildings, equipment, etc.) inventory and valuation which has been incorporated into the City's financial records. The next step required to be proactive in preparation for the implementation of this accounting standard is to have an inventory and valuation completed on the City's infrastructure fixed assets (read systems, storm drains, City-owned right-of-way, etc.). Conrad Business Services, Inc. (Conrad) has performed infrastructure inventory and valuation services for several cities throughout Southern California including Temple City, La Quinta and La Palma. Based on the company's extensive experience in this area, staff is recommending contracting with Conrad to perform the City's infrastructure inventory and valuation. The end product of Conrad's work will be a comprehensive report that lists all of the City's infrastructure fixed assets with their respective valuations in both a hard copy and an electronic format. The City will be able to update the inventory (either solely with City staff or with the assistance of Conrad) with future years' data to continue meeting the reporting requirement in the future. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fee for completing the City's infrastructure inventory and valuation is $38,080. Funding has been appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2001/02 Amended Budget in account number 1025001-5300. Respectfully submitted, Tamara L. Layne Finance Officer -2- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this 5th day of June, 2002, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Conrad Business Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). A. Recitals (1) City has heretofore expressed its intent to contract for professional services with respect to assistance with the inventory and valuation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's infrastructore assets. (2) Consultant has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services, a full, true, and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereofi (3) City desires to retain Consultant to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to City, City Council, and staff in the inventory and valuation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's infi'astructure assets. (4) Consultant represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Consultant as follows: B. Agreement 1. Consultant a~rees as follows: (a) Consultant shall forthwith undertake and perform the services in accordance with Exhibits "A" attached hereto, and all in accordance with Federal, State, and City statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. (b) Consultant shall, at Consultant's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other pemons as may, in the opinion of Consultant, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event that any such other persons are retained by Consultant, Consultant hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform such services required heretmder. Consultant further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained hy Consultant except upon the prior written approval of the City. (c) Consultant shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to City. Copies shall be in such nmnbers as are required by City. City may thereafter review and forward to Consultant comments regarding said documents and Consultant shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. City shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by the City. 2. City agrees as follows: (a) To pay Consultant a maximum sum not to exceed $38,080 for the perfom~ance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct or indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to Consultant. Payment to Consultant shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. /03 (b) Payments to Consultant shall be made by City in accordance with the invoices submitted by Consultant, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable amount of time after said invoices are received by City. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 30 days. (c) Consultant agrees that, in no event, shall City be required to pay to Consultant any sum in excess of $38,080 prior to receipt by City of all fmal documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein, in acceptable form and content to City. Final payment shall be made not later than Sixty (60) days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by City. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested in writing by City, and not included in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement. Charges fer additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by City within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by City. 3. City agrees to provide Consultant: (a) Information and assistance as necessary. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which Consultant considers necessary in order to complete the Project. (c) Such information as is generally available from City files applicable to the Project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information fi.om other goveranaental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be Consultant's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 4. Ownership of documents: All documents and other writings of any nature prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of the City and, upon payment for services performed by Consultant, such documents and identified materials shall be delivered to City by Consultant. Consultant may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as Consultant may desire. Any reuse of such documents on any other project without Consultant's prior written consent shall be at City's sole risk. 5. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by City upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to Consultant at least Fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, Consultant shall be compensated at Consultant's applicable hourly rates, as set forth in Exhibit "A", on a pro rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of ten~nination. In no event, however, shall Consultant receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 2(a), above. Consultant shall provide to City any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by Consultant as of the date of termination. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 6. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 6. The below-named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Tamara L. Layne Finance Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Marcus D. Davis Vice President Conrad Business Services, Inc. 1100 Main Street, Suite C Irvine, CA 92614 7. Insurance: Consultant shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. Consultant shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Consultant shall furnish to City a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in car[ying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Consultant shall, prior to commencing work, sign and file with City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700 which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of this Agreement." (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at Consultant's sole cost and expense, Consultant shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of the City and Consultant, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Consultant's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to nny one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. If such insurance includes an aggregate limit, such aggregate shall be no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). (c) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 7(a) and (h) shall name as additional insureds City, its elected officials, officers, employees and designnted agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that: (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and City's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by City; and (3) they may not be canceled except after thirty (30) days notice by insurer to City by first class mail. Consultant shall furnish City with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing insurance. Consultant may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 8. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and save harmless City,, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by Consultant of any and all legal costs and attorney's fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by Consultant of this Agreement, resulting from Consultant's negligent acts, errors or omissinns or other wrongful conduct including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 9. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either whole or in part, by Consultant without the prior written consent of City. 10. Damages: In the event that Consultant fails to submit to City the completed project, together with all documents and supplemental material required hereunder, in public hearing form, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, within the time set forth herein, or as may be extended by written consent of the parties hereto, Consultant shall pay to the City as liquidated damages an amount equal to any and all amounts paid by City to Consultant under the terms of this Agreement, which sum represents a reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto to estimate a fair compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result fi.om such a default in perlbrmance by Consultant, and due to the difficulty which would otherwise occur in establishing actual damages resulting from such default, unless said default is caused by City, or by acts of God, acts of the public enemy, fire, flood, epidemic, or quarantine restrictions. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that Consultant and its employees, officers, and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of the City. 12. Governing; Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorneys' Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attomeys' fees and court costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing, signed by all parties. /o8 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above: CONSULTANT CITY Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSAL FOR GASB 34 INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY AND VALUATION SERVICES Submitted By, CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. 1100 Main Street, Suite C Irvine, California 92614 Contact Person: MARCUS D. DAVIS (949) 474-2020 ext. 223 (949) 263-5520 (fax) mddavis~cbiz.com January4,2002 Information contained herein contains proprietary information and shall not be reproduced In any form unless to assist the responsible individuals in ewtluation of this proposal. 3entury Business Services Conrad Business Services, Inc. ~.100 Main Street, Suite C Irvine, California 926~.4 Phone (949) 474-2020 Fax (949) 263-5520 January 4, 2002 Ms. Tamara Layne Finance Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR GASB 34 INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY AND VALUATION SERVICES Dear Ms. Layne: In response to your request, Conrad Business Services, Inc. would be pleased to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with an inventory and valuation of its infrastructure assets in accordance with the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 34. We believe we would be your best selection for the following reasons which are set forth in greater detail in our proposal: · Conrad Business Services, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Century Business Services, Inc. (CBIZ). Conrad Business Services, Inc. was formed as a Califomia corporation in March 1999 from the consulting portion of the practice of Conrad and Associates, L.L.P., an independently owned CPA firm. Some of the previous experience noted in this proposal prior to the formation of this separate consulting company was gained by Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. In the context of this proposal, the two firms should be viewed as one entity as all employees provide services on behalf of both entities. · During the past thirty-one years, Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. has provided numerous audit and related services to various public agencies. · Conrad Business Services, Inc. recently completed infrastructure valuations in accordance with the requirements of GASB 34 for the cities of Temple City, La Quinta and La Palina. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is currently under performing infrastructure valuations for the Cities. of Santa Aha and Newport Beach. CBIZ is the leading provider of integrated business services and products to Business Amedca. Nasdaq: CBIZ · Ce~tu~ Business Se~ices. InC. · www.cbiz.com / 0 ¢ Ms. Tamara Layne Finance Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga January 4, 2002 Pa__~Two · Conrad Business Services, inc. was recently selected by the City of San Clemente to perform an inventory and valuation of infrastructure assets in accordance with GASB 34. Additionally, we have also been selected as the final candidate for the GASB 34 valuation for the City of N~,tional City. · The professional staff of Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. is highly specialized in governmental "n The finn devotes significant time and resources to continuing professional education aud~t~ .g.. ,... ___t^~ r,,r the County of Orange, County of Los Angeles, State of related to government auulung p~itutm~u x,, -a · California, and the U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the National Science Foundation. · Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. also specializes in local governmental auditing. We currently serve approximately sixty (60) municipal clients in the Southern California area. We currently serve as auditors for thirty-eight (38) cities in California, including the cities of Santa Aha, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Orange, San Bemardino and San Clemente. We also serve ~ auditors for the redevelopment agencies of those cities. In addition, we perform the audits of numerous sewer, water and other special districts and public and private non-profit organizations. · During calendar year 2000, our professional staff performed approximately 102,000 hours of financial and compliance examinations for governmental entities. · We believe our approach is one that recognizes the need for close coordination and communication with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. · Conrad Business Services, Inc. has a pool of personnel that are qualified to perform the work. · This proposal shall remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. ~ · Mr. Marcus D. Davis, Vice President, is authorized to bind our firm in contractual matters with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He is the contact person during the period of proposal evaluation and can be reached at the address on our letterhead or the telephone number below. Our firm thanks the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the opportunity to present our proposal and · qualifications. You may contact me at (949) 474-2020, extension 223. Sincerely, C01~ BUSINESS SERVICES, INC, Marcus D. Davis Vice President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSAL FOR GASB34INFRASTRUCTUREINVENTORYAND VALUATION TABLE OF CONTENT~ _Section Page. Cover Letter 1 Background and Approach 5 Methodologies 8 Work Plan Project Organization and Staffing 11 17 Related Experience 19 Project Schedule 20 Cost of Services III BACKGROUND AND APPROACH Conrad and Associates, L.L.P., an independently owned CPA firm, was formed in Iowa on January l, 1971 by Ronald L. Conrad. Since moving the offices to California over 26 years ago, the firm has become one of the top accounting firms in Orange County. In 2001, the finn was ranked twelfth in size in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal. In March 1999, Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. formed Conrad Business Services, Inc. in order to better provide general financial and management consulting services to its clients. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is dedicated to rendering outstanding professional service of the highest quality. We employ highly qualified individuals and provide them with on-going training and education, contributing to the professional growth and development of each individual. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is a corporation and is located in Irvine, California. We have a staff of sixty-two (62) individuals, including fifty-four (54) professionals. Since its inception, Conrad Business Services, Inc. and Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. have specialized in governmental[ and non-profit accounting, auditing and consulting. For the past thirty-one years, the firm has been performing accounting, audit and consulting services to the private and public sectors, as well as not-for-profit organizations. A breakdown of our finn's personnel by classification is as follows: Number of Classification Personnel President 1 Vice Presidents 7 Managers/Supervisors 19 Seniors 17 Staff 10 Administrative Support .~8 Total personnel 62 The types of services performed by Conrad Business Services, Inc. and Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. include: · GASB 34 infrastructure valuation · Municipal auditing and accounting · Municipal special services including: user fee studies; cost allocation plan',;; management and organizational reviews; budget preparation; performance-based budgeting; outsourcing; transient occupancy tax audits; and recovery auditing. · Non-profit auditing and accounting · Website development · Financial software implementations · Tax and advisory services Conrad Business Services, Inc. / ~ 2- BACKGROUND AND APPROACH (CONTINUED} As part of our commitment to educating cities in the requirements of GASB 34 infrastructure valuation, we have met with the cities of Buena Park, Orange, Highland, Laguna Beach, San Bemardino, Torrance and Lomita to review the tYPes of infrastructure to be valued, as well as discuss the valuation process. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is being recommended by the Cities of Highland and Torrance to perform project management and valuation services for their infrastructure portions of GASB 34. Both cities have elected to internally compile the inventories of infrastructure assets, under our direction. The City of Highland has also elected to have our firm value the assets for the City after they are compiled. These contracts are pending City Council approval. Since Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. was founded, the firm has concentrated its efforts towards gnvemmental audits. Emphasis was placed on acquiring contracts with federal and public agencies in a manner which complimented the capabilities of the professional staff. The various federal agency contracts have provided our firm a diversified opportunity to grow, as well as gain an understanding.of the particular yet different needs of each grantor agency. Our exposure to the different grantor agencies has provided us with an understanding of the agency's audit approach and allowed our firm the opportunity to address their particular needs in a manner consistent with Generally Accepted Governmental Auditing Standards as outlined in Government Auditing Standards - Standards for Audits of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions issued by the Controller General of the United States. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is fully qualified to complete the services described in the Request for Proposal for Valuation of Infrastructure Assets. The key personnel identified in the section entitled Proiect Organization and Staffing (see page 11) have extensive local government experience, from both the consultanl/audit and municipal employee perspectives. We believe that this unique combination of experience enables Conrad Business Services, Inc. to deliver a product to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that will not only accomplish the objectives of this project, but also be user-friendly. The key personnel assigned to the City of San Clemente were also the key personnel for the infrastructure valuations for the Cities of Temple City, La Palina, La Quinta, Newport Beach and Sant~, Ama. Conrad Business Services, Inc. prides itself on our ability to complete projects within prescribed timeframes and on budget. We are of the opinion that if a project is awarded on a fixed fee basis, then there should not be any change orders to the contract. We perform whatever work: is necessary to complete the required project for our stated fixed fee price. Additionally, once Conrad Business Services, Inc. commits to a deadline, we meet that deadline. Based upon the information provided in the request for proposals, Conrad Business Services, Inc. commits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that we will assign all resources necessary to ensure that this project is completed on time and on budget. Our approach to providing infrastructure valuation services is one of a joint effort between Conrad Business Services, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We believe that this partnership will help to set the project up for success. The effort required of the City will be minimal and consist primarily of assigning a project liaison to coordinate meetings with departmenis, and to discuss and resolve outstanding issues. All remaining work to be performed will be conducted and coordinated by Conrad Business Services, Inc. We will keep appropriate City staff informed as to the status of the project through periodic briefings. This will ensure that the project stays on time and on budget. Conrad Business Services, lnc. BACKGROUND AND APPROACH (CONTINUED) Although GASB 34 infrastructure valuation is still new and very few cities have actually completed a valuation, Conrad Business Services, Inc. has experience in performing such a valuation. Additionally, through both Conrad Business .Services, Inc. and Conrad and Associates, L.L.P., we have offered educational seminars to local governments regarding the requirements of GASB 34. Our most recent seminar was held on April 19, 2001. Conrad Business Services, Inc. will continue to stay committed to ensuring its clients and future clients are fully informed as to the requirements of GASB 34, and are prepared to assist with all aspects of implementation, either as a facilitator to the city's implementation, or to provide a turnkey approach. As demonstrated, Conrad Business Services, Inc. has the requisite prior experience to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a valuation and inventory of infrastructure assets. This, cottpled with our ongoing educational program for clients and others, makes Conrad Business Services, Inc. the City's best selection for this project. Our Understanding of the Project We understand that this project will include a complete inventory and valuation of the City's infrastructure assets in accordance with the provisions of GASB 34. Preliminarily, these infrastructure assets include the following networks: Road System Network · Arterial Streets Subsystem · Residential Streets Subsystem · Alleys Subsystem Landscaped Median Subsystem · Bridge Subsystem Street Lighting Subsystem · Traffic Control Subsystem · Curb & Gutter Subsystem · Street Tree Subsystem · Sidewalk Subsystem · Bike TrailsfPaseos/Horse Trail Subsystem Storm drainage Network · Storm Drain Subsystem · Catch Basin Subsystem · Retention Basins Others · City-owned right-of-way · Works of art and historical treasures · Library Conrad Business Services, Inc. 3//¢ BACKGROUND AND APPROACH (CONTINUED) · Walls and Fencing · Monument Signs · Parking Lots ~ · Fiber Optic Network The actual infrastructure assets to be valued, and the level of detail required, will be determined as outlined in the section entitled Work Plan (see page 8). The end product of our work will be a report presented to the City documenting the inventory and valuation of the City's infrastructure assets in accordance with GASB 34. We will work with the City's auditors to ensure the data contained in the report will be both auditable and acceptable. We also understand that the objectives of this engagement include: 1) A review of the various inventories and relevant infrastructure data for each subsystem, works of art, historical treasures, etc. as previously identified; 2) Identification of needed additions to the inventories, useful life expectancy for each infrastructure subsystem, works of art, historical treasures, etc. based on input from City personnel and industry standards; 3) Provide direction and recommendations for developing procedures for maintaining the infrastructure inventory. Conrad Business Services, Inc. ,1~ / 5 METHODOLOGIES Included in this section are the various methodologies available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the City moves forward with its infrastructure inventory and valuation. These methodologies are discussed in detail as follows. Physical Inventory versus Utilizing Existing Records There are two primary approaches to conducting an infrastructure valuation in accordance with the provisions of GASB 34. Those approaches would be to either conduct a complete physical inventory of all infrastructure assets, or to utilize existing records as the basis for the inventory, and estimate the data that is missing. In our experience, a combination of both of these approaches provides the best alternative. The benefit of performing a complete physical inventory of all of the infrastructure assets is that this approach will provide the most accurate information. However, this approach is also the most costly to complete. GASB 34 is broad in its allowances of estimates and judgments in compiling infrastructure data. As such, most governments that have implemented GASB 34 have not chosen this approach as it can represent overkill in relation to the benefit received. This approach would only be recommended if the City had some other need or use for the complete physical inventory. The approach of utilizing existing infrastructure, inventory records from which the inventory will be compiled is by far the most cost effective. Additionally, utilizing this approach also meets the spirit of GASB 34. The disadvantage of this approach is that some of the infrastructure data may not be exact. As long as the City is not using this data for future planning purposes, i.e. budgeting for construction of missing sidewalks based upon this report, then the exactness of the report can be estimated. Our approach is described in detail in the section entitled Work Plan (see page 8). The City will need to make three other decisions as part of their implementation of the infrastructure provisions of GASB 34. Those decisions are: · Whether to depreciate the infrastructure assets, or account for them using the modified approach; · Whether to include all infrastructure assets in the inventory, or only those acquired aRer June 30, 1980; and · Whether to track the assets individually or in networks and subsystems. Depreciation vs. Modified Approach This issue has been the source of much debate between finance departments and public works departments. Most finance departments prefer to depreciate the infrastructure assets, whereas most public works departments would prefer to account for them using the modified approach. Of the five (5) cities we have assisted with their GASB 34 infrastructure valuations, each city has elected to depreciate. This election has been based primarily upon the additional cost required for the modified approach. Conrad Business Services, Inc. /~1/ ~ METHODOLOGIES (CONTINUED) Regardless of whether depreciation or the modified approach is selected, the City still needs to perform an infrastructure valuation. Depreciation is the easiest method to implement. In most cases, cities are akeady set up to depreciate assets, especially if they have water and/or sewer funds in which depreciation is already being calculated. Under this method, the City will need to enter all of its infrastructure assets into its asset management system in order for depreciation to be calculated. There is generally no other work required. Under the modified approach, the City will need to establish a condition level at which it will maintain its infrastructure assets. This initial condition level must be adopted by the City Council. The City will conduct an initial condition assessment to determine whether or not it is in compliance with the established condition level. This initial condition assessment will result in an additiomd cost to the City if the City does not have the capability of performing the assessment in house. Additionally, a condition assessment must be performed every three years to ensure that the City is maintaining its infrastructure assets at the prescribed condition level. This will also result in an additional cost to the City. The modified approach also requires additional disclosures in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. It is acceptable for the City to elect the modified approach for only some of its infrastructure assets. This split in methods is acceptable provided an entire network of assets is tracked similarly. For example, the City may choose to track its streets under the modified approach, and depreciate all other infrastructure assets. Conrad Business Services, Inc. does not endorse one method over the other. Some of the agencies we have assisted have initially adopted the depreciation method, but have indicated they may convert to the modified approach for some of their infrastructure assets. All Assets versus Infrastructure Acquired/Constructed qfter June 30, 1980 In a compromise effort, the GASB allows agencies to only capitalize those infrastructure assets acquired or constructed after June 30, 1980, as opposed to capitalizing all infrastructure assets. The City will need to make a decision regarding this issue early in the implementation. The advantage of only capitalizing those infrastructure assets acquired/constructed after June 30, 1980 is the cost of consultant time will be less. Additionally, fewer assets will need to be tracked for improvements. The disadvantages to this are that in most cases, the City will need to review the asset anyway in order to determine whether it was pre or post-June 30, 1980. Furthermore, as improvements are made, the City will have to analyze whether the item being improved was originally capitalized or not. By capitalizing all assets, this guesswork/analysis will be minimized. One additional factor the City should consider when determining whether to capitalize all assets or only those acquired/constructed after June 30, 1980, is the amount of liabilities being brought onto the Statement of Net Assets. If the City is highly leveraged, and chooses to capitalize only the post-June 30, 1980 infrastructure assets, the Statement of Net Assets may result in a deficit. All of the agencies we have assisted to date have elected to capitalize all assets, just to avoid this potential reporting issue. 6 Conrad Business Services, lnc. / / 7 METHODOLOGIES (CONTINUED) Track Infrastructure Assets Individually versus Networks/Subsystem~ A final decision the City will need to make is whether it will track assets individually in its records, or group the assets into networks and subsystems. Generally, tracking assets individually means at the same level as replacements occur. For example, if the City has broken its streets down inlo segments for its pavement management system, then the City may want to capitalize the streets by those same segments. The rationale being that as replacements/improvements occur, they are generally performed to the segment as a whole. This makes the recordkeeping easier. Some of the larger cities we have assisted have opted to capitalize assets by network or subsystem due to the large volume of individual assets. The difficulty of this election comes with calculating the mount of asset replaced., and thus what amount should be removed from the books. Conrad Business Services, lnc. WORK PLAN In order to provide the City with an example of the manner in which we typically perform a GASB 34 infrastructure inventory and valuation, the following sets forth our proposed work plan, which has proven to be successful in our previous engagements. This work plan would be modified to address the specific issues to be addressed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Task 1: Pro/ect Kick-off- We would meet with appropriate City Finance and Public Works, and other department staff as determined necessary by the City, to discuss the timing of the project, records required and expectations of City staff. Based upon the data provided, we would request that the existing inventory data, be made available to us at the project kick-off. As previously described, the expectations of City staff will be minimal, and only require designation of an overall project liaison with decision-making authority, and designation of a contact for each infrastructure type to answer technical questions that may arise during the course of the project. Our project team is committed to be as minimally disruptive to ongoing City operations as possible. Task 2: Fieldwork - During this stage, we would refine and agree on the major classes of infrastructure assets to be inventoried and valued. We would use the existing records to compile the inventory and determine what data needed for valuation purposes is missing. Our approach to developing an inventory of infrastructure is to first identify all sources of existing inventory records that the City may have. These records often times take the form of a pavement management system, assessor's parcel maps, construction plans, zoning maps, detailed listings maintained by departments responsible for a type of asset, etc. Once we have identified the inventory records, we test the records to ensure they are accurate and complete. This will include random field visits to verify that assets exist and are at the location specified in the records. After we are confident that the records are accurate and complete, we compile the inventory of infrastructure and identify any missing data that is necessary in order for us to value the assets. When existing inventory information is not available, we would create the inventory tl-trough whatever means necessary. This could include working from aerial maps, assessor's parcel maps, or driving the City and physically inspecting the assets. In the City of Temple City, records did not exist for sidewalks. In order to gather the inventory, we drove all streets within the City and documented where sidewalks did and did not exist. We will inquire as to whether the City has actual cost data relative to the infrastructure items. If the City does, we would need to review whatever documentation the City has to support the historical cost. This documentation may include summary spreadsheets, capital projects ledgers, City Council agenda reports, or actual invoices. It has been our experience, however, that the actual cost daxa is generally not available. Other historical information required will include access to the various existing inventory records maintained by the City. Copies are not required at the outset of the project. We will determine which specific documents we plan to use and make copies of just those documents for our files. During this task, we will also coordinate with the City's independent auditors to ensure that the final product will be acceptable from an audit perspective. As Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. audits 8 Conrad Business Services, Inc. / [ ¢ WORK PLAN (CONTINUED) numerous local government clients in Southern California and is recognized as a leader in municipal auditing, we believe our approach will be acceptable by other audit firms. Task 3: Determination qfAssumptions - This task would involve determining and documenting certain assumptions to be made in order to complete the data required for each infrastructure asset for valuation purposes. GASB 34 allows for estimations and assumptions to be made in gathering prior infrastructure data. It has been our experience that due to the age of many of the infrastructure assets, and the condition of records, assumptions are an integral part of the infrastructure valuation process. All assumptions made will be presented to the City's project liaison for approval. At the completion of the project, we will document all assumptions and ask the City to represent that the assumptions are logical and reasonable. Task 4: Valuation of Infrastructure Assets - This task would involve reviewing accourtting records to determine if historical cost data is available. If historical cost data is not available, then vie will estimate historical cost by determining current replacement cost and trending it back to the date of acquisition through the use of indexes. We will establish the current replacement cost by using a combination of recent bids or contract awards for similar projects within the City, and data we have gathered by performing infrastructure valuations for other municipalities. The indexes to be used will include the Construction Cost Index for all constructed assets, and the Consumer Price Index for all purchased assets. In valuing the infrastructure fixed assets, Conrad Business Services, Inc. also appraises the fight-of-way beneath the streets. We believe that this service sets us apart from the other GASB 34 valuation firms. It has been noted by both GASB and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) that land and land rights, although not considered infrastructure, should be recorded on the City's books as capital assets. Easements upon which a street is constructed, although not City-owned, are land rights and should be valued. Conrad Business Services, Inc. values the right-of-way utilizing comparable land sales within and adjacent to the City, which are of a similar zoning. For purposes of valuation, we view the zoning of the adjacent property with the highest and best use to be the zoning of the land and land fights to be valued. As part of this project, we will bring the City into compliance with reporting its right-of-way. Task 5: Preparation o£Draft Report - A draft report would be prepared and submitted to Finance, Public Works, and other departments' staff as required by the City for their review and comment. Task 6: Preparation o£Final Report - Any comments received from Finance, Public Works and other departments' staff on the draft report will be incorporated into the final report. W6 will deliver the final report both in hard copy and electronically, in Excel format. Optional Service - Annual Updates of Inventories - At the City's request, we have provided information regarding Conrad Business Services, Inc. maintaining the infrastructure inventories on an annual basis. As the project progresses, we will keep appropriate City staff informed. This form of regular, on-going communication may take the form of periodic progress meetings, formal written progress reports, email Conrad Business Services, Inc. WORK PLAN (CONTINUED) updates or telephone calls. At our project kick-offmeeting, we will discuss with the City through which method of communication they prefer to be updated. Most of the City involvement typically comes from the Public Works Department. Pnblic Works is generally the keeper of the infrastructure records. We would need a knowledgeable employee to assist us in determining the type of records available, their location and the information tracked. We will also need access to the GIS information. Our staff is fully capable of reading zoning maps, as-built construction plans, and pulling information from public works files, if acceptable to the City. It has been our experience that we will spend approximately one week on-site at the City collecting information at the outset of the project and then will make periodic visits to follow-up and resolve issues as they arise. It is our intention to keep the disruption to City staff to an absolute minimmm. Upon award of contract, Conrad Business Services, Inc. will send a request letter to the I~ty ~dent fying the specific records we would like to be made available to us at the project kick-offmeeting. Typically, these records will include: Pavement Management System reports (in electronic format if possible) · Zoning map · Any maps of the City · Access to assessor's parcel maps · Any master plans, whether completed or in draft form · Existing inventory records, if any Conrad Business Services, Inc. iO~ / PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING Conrad Business Services, Inc. proposes to use the following key personnel on this engagement. City of Rancho Cucamonga Marcus D. Davis, CPA Engagement Manager Carol Jacobs Project Manager Mike Peters R-O-W Appraiser Staff As Assigned See attached r6sum6s of key personnel for individual experience. The staff to be assigned will be primarily responsible for assisting with the compilation of the inventory records. Specific individuals will be assigned at the time the project commences. As illustrated in the section entitled Background and Approach (see page 1), Conrad Business Services, Inc. has a pool of ten (I0) staff employees to assign to this engagement. All staff assigned will be under the direct supervision of the Project Manager. Conrad Business Services, Inc. states that the key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the project, and no person designated as "key" to the project will be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Conrad Business Services, lnc. 11~ 22 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING (CONTINUED) MARCUS D. DA VIS, C.P.A. ROLE ON PROJECT: Mr. Davis will serve as the Engagement Manager on th~s project. He will coordinate all contractual matters with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, provide technical assistance to the project team and will review the final product before it is released. He brings a strong local goverument auditing and accounting background to his engagements. Mr. Davis is a Certified Public Accountant with in excess of 17 years experience in local government accounting and financial reporting. EXPERIENCE: · Vice President, Conrad Business Services, Inc. September 1998 to Present. Mr. Davis currently is a Vice President with the firm. His responsibilities include directing the municipal specialized projects unit of the firm. He has been responsible for assisting municipalities with infrastructure valuation in order to comply with GASB Statement No. 34, transient occupancy tax auditing, outsourcing services to municipalities, user fee studies, cost allocation plans, and other special projects requested by municipalities. Mr. Davis served as the Engagement Manager for the Cities of Temple City, La Palma, La Quinta, Newport Beach and Santa Aha in the valuation of their infrastructure to comply with GASB 34. · Acting Director of Finance, City of Costa Mesa. May 1990 to September 1998. During Mr. Davis' tenure with the City of Costa Mesa, he served as the City's Deputy Treasurer, Assistant Director of Finance and Acting Director of Finance. His responsibilities included directing the efforts of a department of twenty-three (23) employees. Services provided included investments, accounting, accounts payable, payroll, purchasing, budget, billing, accounts receivable, debt collection and central warehouse. Mr. Davis was instrumental in developing an in-house program to calculate city- wide user fees. · Acting, Director of Finance, City of Buena Park. October 1988 to May 1990. Mr. Davis served as the City's Deputy Treasurer and Acting Director of Finance during his tenure with the City of Buena Park. P, esponsibilitics included directing the efforts of thc Finance Department with a staffof fifteen (15) employees. Services provided included investments, accounting, accounts payable, payroll, water billing, purchasing, budget, and management information services. During his tenure with the City, Mr. Davis developed several programs to bring audit-related functions in-house. · Supervisor, Conrad & Associates, L.L.P. September 1984 to October 1958. During this period, Mr. Davis was a Supervisor with the firm. His responsibilities included managing thc.. audits of cities, special districts, nonprofit organizations, and federal and state agencies. Conrad Business Services, Inc. 12 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING (CONTINUED) MARCUS D. DA VIS, C.P.A. (CONTINUED) EDUC~ATION: Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration, with Emphasis in Accounting, 1984 California State University Fullerton PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS: Certified Public Accountant, State of California, Certificate No. 46491E PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants California Society of Certified Public Accountants California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Conrad Business Services, lnc. 13/2¢ PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING (CONTINUED) CAROL JA COBS ROLE ON PROJECT Ms, Jacobs will serve as the Project Manager for this project and will coordinate all conm~unication and work for the City o£Rancho Cucamonga. Ms. Jacobs has in excess of twelve years of local government experience with the City of Costa Mesa in both finance and public works capacities. She currently manages the specialized municipal services practice area with the finn. EXPERIENCE: · Director of Financial Solutions, Conrad Business Services, Inc. October 2000 to Present. Ms. Jacobs currently is the firm's Director of Financial Solutions. She is responsible for the management and development of our specialized municipal services practice area. These services include infrastructure valuation in order to comply with GASB 34, user fee studies, indirect cost allocation plans, performance based-budgeting, fixed asset inventory, outsourcing services to municipalities, grant writing, long range financial plans, and other special projects requested by municipalities. Ms. Jacobs served as thc Project Manager for the Cities of Temple City, La Palina, La Quinta, Newport Beach and Santa Ana in the valuation of their infrastructure to comply with GASB 34. · Budget and Research Officer, City of Costa Mesa. January 1996 to October 2000. During Ms. Jacobs' tenure with the City of Costa Mesa, she served as the City's Budget and Research Officer. Her responsibilities included directing the efforts of Budget and Purchasing. Services provided included budget preparation, long range financial planning, annual update of user fees and indirect cost allocation plans, fixed asset inventory, purchasing, and central warehouse. ]vis. Jacobs was instrumental in developing an in-house program to calculate citywide user fees, indirect cost rates and benefit rates. · Budget Analyst, City of Costa Mesa. August 1994 to January 1996. Ms. Jacobs served as the Budget Analyst for the City. Responsibilities included assisting with the preparation of annual operating and capital improvement budgets. Monitoring of expenditures versus budget and analyzed variances. Preparation of reimbursement claims to the State of California for mandated programs. Calculation of indirect cost rates for use by all departments. Update of citywide user fees and charges. · Management Analyst, City of Costa Mesa. August 1990 to August 1994. Ms. Jacobs served as thc Management Analyst for the City of Costa Mesa in the Public Services Department. Her responsibilities included preparation of the capital improvement program, preparation and reporting of grants from Federal, State and local government agencies, public relations with the community on public works projects. Conrad Business Services, Inc. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING (CONTINUED) CAROL JA COBS (CONTINUED) EDUCATION: Bachelor of A_rts in Communications, 1984 Masters in Public Administration, 1991 California State University Fullerton PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Califomia Society of Municipal Finance Officers Conrad Business Services, Inc. 15/2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING (CONTINUED) MIKE PETERS, MAI ROLE ON PROJECT Mr. Peters will serve as t~e Right-of-Way Appraiser for the project. He has in excess of twenty-six years of real estate valuation and consulting experience. His firm is a subcontractor of Conrad Business · Services, Inc. EXPERIENCE Diversified Realty ~4ppraisal, L.P. 1977 to Present. Mr. Peters is cm-rently the Managhxg Partner with Diversified Realty Appraisal, L.P. His company provides valuation and advisory services for all types of property in California, Arizona and Nevada. Mr. Peters has valued the right-of-way on behalf of Conrad Business Services, Inc. for our infi'astructure valuations for the Cities of Temple City, La Palina, La Quinta, Newport Beach and Santa Aha. EDUCATION AND CREDENTIALS Mr. Peters holds a Masters in Business Administration (MBA) degree flora the University of Southern California and has been a Member of the Appraisal Institute since 1976. He has served on the Institute's National Ethics Committee and Admissions Committee, and is a Member of the International Right-of- Way Association. He is licensed to conduct appraisals in California, Nevada and Arizona. Mr. Peters has also provided litigation support and expert testimony in both Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Conrad Business Services, Inc. 16/2 7 RELATED EXPERIENCE City of Temple City, Francine Maldonado, Financial Services Director, 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780. Telephone: (626) 285-2171 · Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work included right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traffic signals, street lights, bus shelters, sewers and trees. In addition, Conrad Business Services, Inc. created new inventories for sidewalks. The Engagement Manager was Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs the Project Manager and Mike Peters the Right-of-Way Appraiser. The project was completed in January 2001. City of La Quinta, John Falconer, Finance Director, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. Telephone: (760) 777-7055 · Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work included: right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traffic signals, street lights, bus shelters, sewers, retention basins, bike paths and public art. The Engagement Manager was Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs was the Project Manager, Jim Miller the Senior Consultant, and Mike Peters the Right-of-Way Appraiser. The project was completed as of June 30, 2001 and finalized September 2001. This report will be used by the City of La Quinta to convert their Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to GASB 34 compliance as of June 30, 2001. City of La Palma, Robbeyn Bird, Financial Services Manager, 7822 Walker Street, La Palma, CA 90623. Telephone: (714) 690-3323 · Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work included: right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traffic signals, monument signs and storm drains. The Engagement Manager was Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs was the Project Manager, Jim Miller the Senior Consultant, and Mike Peters the Right-of-Way Appraiser. The City's Public Works Department chose to compile the inventory and Conrad Business Services, Inc. verified the inventory and valued the infrastructure assets. The project was completed in December 2001. City of Newport Beach, Dan Matusiewicz, Accounting Manager, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. Telephone: (949) 644-3126. · Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work included: right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traftic signals, street lights, parking meters, libraries, public art, sewers, water system, reservoirs beaches, piers, harbors, groins, bulkheads, moorings, jetties, oil wells and storm drains. The Engagement Manager was Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs was the Project Manager, Jim Miller the Senior Consultant, and Mike Peters the Right- of-Way Appraiser. The project is in progress with a draf~ expected to be .completed during January 2002. Conrad Business Services, Inc. 1// 2~ RELATED EXPERIENCE (CONTINUED') City of Santa Ana, David Borik Accounting Manager and Teri Cable Administrative Services Manager, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. Telephone Numbers: David Borik (714) 647-6961; Teri Cable (714) 647-565& ,, Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work included: right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traffic signals, street lights, libraries, public art, sewers, water system, museums, and storm drains. The Engagement Manager was Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs was the Project Manager, Jim Miller the Senior Consultant, and Mike Peters the Right-of-Way Appraiser. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is working closely with the City's Public Works Department to create the inventories and we will then have full responsibility to complete the valuation and report. The project is in progress with a draft expected to be completed during January 2002. · Conrad Business Services, Inc. also completed an analysis of the modified ~[pproach versus depreciation for the City of Santa Ana. This project involved a high-level analysis of the City's streets, their condition level, calculation of depreciation, and preparation of sample financial statements and footnote disclosures. We presented our report to a department head meeting for their discussion and review of the pros and cons of the modified approach versus depreciation. City of San Clemente, Cherie Fredricks, Finance Manager I00 Avenida Presidio, San Clemente, California 92672 (949) 361-8359 · Citywide infrastructure inventory and valuation back to the date of incorporation. Work will include: right-of-way, streets, medians, bridges, traffic signals, street lights, libraries, public art, sewers, water system, and storm drains. The Engagement Manager is Marc Davis, Carol Jacobs Jim Miller the Project Manager, and Mike Peters the Right-of-Way Appraiser. Conrad Business Services, Inc. is working closely with the City's Public Works Department to create the inventories and we will then have full responsibility to complete the valuation and report. The was awarded in December 2001 with fieldwork to begin January 2002. Conrad Busiaess Services, lnc. 15/,~. ¢ PROJECT SCHEDULE Our proposed timeline for completion of the tasks is as follows. This timeline will be refined in conjunction with the City project liaison to ensure that it allows for all parties to be available, and will not conflict with other previous City commitments. Task Estimated Duration Project kick-off Within two weeks after contxact award. Fieldwork Immediately after project kick-6ff, and lasting approximately five weeks. Determination of assumptions Performed immediately after the completion of fieldwork, and lasting approximately one week. Valuation of infrastructure assets Performed immediately after the assumptions are determined, and lasting approximately two weeks. Preparation of draft report Performed immediately after the valuation of infrastructure assets, and lasting approximately two weeks.. Preparation of final report Performed immediately after receipt of City comments on the draft report, and lasting approximately one week. Update of Inventory Records Estimated to be two to three days per quarter. Based upon our analysis, the total elapsed time to perform the infrastructure valuation services would be approximately eleven weeks. Conrad Business Services, Inc. 19/~ b COST OF SERVICES Conrad Business Services, Inc. will provide GASB 34 infrastructure inventory and valuation services for a fixed fee of $38,080 This fixed fee is inclusive of all travel and out-of-pocket expenses. This fee is broken down into the following tasks, which correspond to those described in the section, entitled Work Plan (see page 8). We will invoice the citY monthly for progress made on the project. A breakdown of the fixed fee by task is as follows: Task Hours Fixed Fee Project Kick-off 8 $ 1,000 Fieldwork 240 21,200 Determination of assumptions 24 2,840 Valuation of infrastructure assets 69 7,340 Preparation of draft report 24 2,840 Preparation of final report 18 2,110 Travel n/a 750 Total fixed fee 383 38~ As requested, Conrad Business Services, Inc. can maintain the infrastructure records for the City on a go forward basis. As the City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to be in a period of growth and expansion, we anticipate that a quarterly review of infrastructure additions and deletions would be preferred. We would perform these quarterly updates for the 2002-03 fiscal year on an hourly basis at our standard hourly rates as identified below, not-to-exceed $2,500 per quarter. Should the scope of the project change, or should additional work be required that is beyond the scope of the RFP and this proposal, Conrad Business Services, Inc. will invoice the City for these additional services at the following hourly rates. No work that is beyond the scope of the RFP or tlfis proposal will be performed without the prior written consent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Classification Hourly Rate Engagement Manager $135 Project Manager 115 R-O-W Appraiser 100 Senior Consultant 95 Senior 85 Staff 75 20 ConradBusinessServices, lnc. /~/ R A N H O C U C A M O N G A N GI I~ I N G I~p^I~TM E N T StaffRe rt DA'T~: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~P' Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tecl'fnician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE 'rilE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $251,900.00 ($229,000.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, NATURE TECH LANDSCAPING, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.11103165650/1320110-0 AND ACCOUNT NO. 11103165650/1319110-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $251,900.00 ($229,000.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Nature Tech Landscaping, Inc., for the construction of the Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Amhibald Avenue, and Hellman from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard Landscape Improvements, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 11103165650/1320110-0 and Account No. 11103165650/1319110-0. BAC KGRO U N D/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 14, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $271,745.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Re~5~'f~ully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 14, 2002 APPARENT LOW BIDDER ARROW ROUTE AND HELLMAN AVENUE LANDSCAPE ENGINEERS COST Nature Tech Mega Ways Enterprises, Inc. IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE Landscaping, Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTEgl NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. ] LS ~learingand Grubbing $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,759.0(] $5,759.00 $22,350.00 $22,350.00 $22,350.00' 2. 165 SF ~onstruct Spandrd $8.00 $1,320.00 $12.00 $1,980.00 $2.70 $445.50 $445.50 3. 8535 SF ;obblestoneHardscape $10.00 $85,350.00 $8.00 $68,280.00 $9.10 $77,668.50 $77,668.50 4. 1194 SF ~" PCC Sidewalk $3.00 $3,582.00 $6.00 $7,164.00 $2.21 $2,638.74 $2,638.74 5. 532 SF PCC Drive approach $8.00 $4,256.00 $8.00 $4,256.00 $2.47 $1,314.04 $1,314.04 6. 85 SF PCC ramp $4.00 $340.00 $8.00 $680.00 $2.21 $'187.85 $187.85 7. I LS ~.u~:omatic Irrigation Systeminc. water, and water m $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $88,159.00 $88,159.00 $86,996.00 $86,996.00 $86,996.00 8. I LS :Soil Preparation, Fine Grading, and Amendments $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,462.38 $4,462.38 $4,462.38 9. 728 EA 5gal~onshrubs-HeavenlyBamboo $16.00 $11,648.00 $12.00 $8,736.00 $14.91 $10,856.60 $10,854.48 10. 474 EA 5 gallon shrubs- Crimson Barbeny $16.00 $7,584.00 $12.00 $5,688.00 $15.56 $7,373.90 $7,375.44 11. 209 EA 5 gallon shrubs- San Jose Juniper $16.00 $3,344.00 $12.00 $2,508.00 $14.73 $3,077.53 $3,078.57 12. 114 EA 15 Gallon Trees- Crape Myrtle $120.00 . $13,680.00 $75.00 $8,550.00 .$75.05 · $8,555.70 $8,555.70 13. 294 LF Concrete Header $9.00 $2,646.00 $10.00 $2,940.00 $8.45 $2,484.30 $2,484.30 14. 35 £A 18"Dia. Boulders $34.00 $1,190.00 $100.00 $3,500.00 $27.79 $972.73 $972.65 15. 37 EA 24" Dia. Boulders $65.00 $2,405.0(] $200.00 $7,400.00 $38.10 $1,409.85 $1,409.70 16. 11 EA 36" Dia. Bouldars $200.00 $2,200.0(] $300.00 $3,300.00 $119.42 $1,313.65 $!,313.62 '17. 140 CY Mulch $30.00 $4,200.0(] $15.00 $2,100.00 $50.14 $7,02Q.00 $7,019.60 18. 1 LS 60 day Maintenance Period $5,000.00 $5,000.0(] $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 '19. I LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.0(] $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,160.00 $4,160.00 $4,160.00 20. I LS Conduit per SCE plan $500.00 $500.0(] $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,430.00 $1,430.00 $1,430.00 TOTAL $271,745.0(3 $229,000.00 $248,357.26 $248,357.07 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 14, 2002 ARROW ROUTE AND HELLMAN AVENUE LANDSCAPE Laird Construction Co., S & M Landscape, Inc. Vido Samarzich, Inc. IMPROVEMENTS Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT I. I ES Clearing and Grubbing $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $57,063.25 $57,063.25 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2. 165 SF Construct Spandrel $19.00 $3,135.00 $13.50 $2,227.50 $13.00 $2,145.00 3. 8535 SF ZobblestoneHardscape $5.20 $44,382.00 $12.10 $103,273.50 $18.00 $153,630.00 4. 1194 SF ~." PCC Sidewalk $4.00 $4,776.00 $3.85 $4,596.90 $6.00 $7,164.00 5. 532 SF ?CC Drive appruach $4.50 $2,394.00 $8.15 $4,335.80 $10.00 $5,320.00 : 6. 85 SF ['CC ramp $20.00 $1,700.00 $9.25 $786.25 $15.00 $1,275.00 7. I LS Automatic lrrigation System inc. water, andwaterm $119,992.00 $119,992.00 $73,500.00 $73,500.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 8. I LS Soil Preparation, Fine Grading, and Amendments $6,500.00 . $6,500.0¢ $3,725.00 $3,725.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 9. 728 EA 5gallonshrubs-HcavcnlyBambco $14.00 $10,192.013 $14.10 $10,264.80 $15.00 $10,920.00 10. 474 EA gallon shrubs - Crimson Barberry $15.00 $7,110.0C $13.75 $6,517.50 $16.00 $7,584.00 11. 209 EA gallon shrubs - San Jose Juniper $!5.00 $3,135.00 $13.50 $2,821.5(3 $16.00 $3,344.00 12. 114 EA 15 Gallon Trees - Crape Myrtle $105.00 $11,970.00 $110.00 $12,540.00 $100.00 .$11,400.00 13 294 LF Concrete Header $10.00 $2,940.00 $15.00 $4,410.0C $12.00 $3,528.012 t4 35 EA 18"Dia. Boulders $20.00 $700.00 $50.00 $1,750.00 $75.00 $2,625.00 15. 37 EA 24" Dia. Boulders $30.00' $1,110.00 $90.00 $3,330.00 $110.00 $4,070.00 16. 11 EA 36" Dia. Boulders $75.00 $825.00 $100.0(1 $1,100.00 $160.00 $1,760.00 17.! 141] CY Mulch $45.00 $6,300.00 $35.013 $4,900.00 $55.00 $7,700.00 18 LS 60 day Maintenance Period $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00! $1,250.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 19 1 LS 'raffle Control $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $1.00 $1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 20 LS Conduit per SCE plan $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 TOTAL $267,161.00 '$298,893.00 $301,465.00 Page 2 VICINITY MAP ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO W/O ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE TO S/O FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION ~lmond ;d~ ~ ~'-~' B~yan -- Route 30 ~ ~. ruder construction) I~d Ay Foothill BI - __ Rt 10 Fre_~ew. ay 4th St L~ ~ EXHIBIT "A" /3~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN 'rilE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG), FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT IN HERMOSA AVENUE UNDER THE METROLINK TRACKS, LOCATED NORTH OF 8TM STREET AT SCRRA MILE POST 40.60 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the License Agreement between the City and SANBAG, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the placement of fiber optic conduit in Hermosa Avenue under the MetroLink tracks located north of 8th Street at SCRRA Mile Post 40.60. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Execution of this agreement and paying the one time fee of $1,000.00 is required prior to constructing the fiber optic conduit under the railroad tracks. The work will be done with the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II improvements. Res~F~-(~tfully submitted, Williah~'J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution License Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 02 - / 7 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG), FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT IN HERMOSA AVENUE UNDER THE METROLINK TRACKS, LOCATED NORTH OF 8TM STREET AT SCRRA MILE POST 40.60 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a License Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG); and WHEREAS, the License Agreement is for the placement of fiber optic conduit in Hermosa Avenue under the Metrolink tracks, located north of 8th Street at SCRRA Mile Post 40.60. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said License Agreement between SANBAG and City for the placement of fiber optic conduit be hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I I 24TH ~NSF RR P P..O J E CT ONTAR, IO CITY LIMIT LOCATION CIT~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,0~R ~.MOSA A~ P~ ~ s/o 8~ ~. ~ N/0 ~0~ ~ S/0 ~ ~. ~CINITY ~P R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DA3'E: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer~-'~3~. Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech~'~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $348,627.40 ($316,934.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SILVIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.11763035650/1153176-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $348,627.40 ($316,934.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., for the construction of the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1153176-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 14, 2002, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $330,724.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, William aPO'Nell Gity Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY {]'O1{ Bll) OlqC, NIN(; MAY 14, 2002 Arrow Route Street Wideniug and Pavement Rehabilitation ENGINEERS COST Silvia Construction, Inc. Gentry Brothers, Inc. from Baker Avenue to Grove Avenue ESTIMATE UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST *,MOUNT COST AMOUNTIAMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1.~ 1 LS .".LEARING AND GRUBBING $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $4,350.00 $4,350.00 $4,350.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.0¢ 2. 1 LS JNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $36,300.00 $36,300.00 $36,300.00 $48,500.00 $48,500.00 3. 1000 TONS 3RUSHEDAGG. BASE (0.50') $30.00 $30,000.00 $22.00~ $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $13.00 $13,000.00 4. 2040 SY CARIABLE COLD PLANE FROM 0' TO 0.12' $1.33 $2,713.2¢ $3.00 $6,120.00 $6,120.00 $3.00 $6,120.00 5. 250¢ TONS ASPHALTRUBBERI-IOTMIX(ARHM} $55.00 $137,500.00 $51.75 $129,375.00 $129,375.00 $56.00 $140,000.00 6. 68£ TONS ~.SPHALTCONC.(R&R)INCL. PAVT. PREP.&CRACKSEAL $45.00 $30,600.00 $47.00 $28,200.00 $31,960.0{] $60.00 $40,800.00 7. 340 SF 'ASPHALT OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $4.00 $1,360.00 $2.45 $833.00 $833.00 $3.00 $1,020.00 8. 12 EA ADJUST TO GRADE (MANHOLES). $200.00 $2,400.00 $231.00 $2,772.00 $2,772.00 $200.00 $2,400.00 9. 20 EA ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER VALVES). $150.00 $3,000.00 $45.00 $900.00 $900.00 $25.00 $500.0O 10. 4 EA ADJUST TO GRADE (WATER METER, PULL BOXES. ETC.) $150.00 $600.00 $145.00 $580.00 $580.00 $25.00 $100.00 ll. 920 LF ;URB AND GUTTER $30.00 $27,600.00 $10.80 $9,936.00 $9,936.00 $15.00 $13,800.00 12. 2300 SF 4'PCCSDWLK&ORVWYSOVERCOMPACTEDNATIVE $3.50 $8,050.00 $1.67 $3,841.00 $3,841.00 $2.50 $5,750.00 13. 1700 SF 6' PCC DRIVEWAYS OVER COMPACTED NATIVE $5.00 $8,500.00 $2.55 $4,335.00 $4,335.00 $3.50 $5,950.0(; 14. 170 SF RIVER WASHED GRANITE COBBLESTONE. $20.00 $3,400.00 $14.80 $2,516.00 $2,516.00 $9.00 $1,530.00 15. 800 SF DRIVEWAY APPROACH; WInTH PER PLAN. $6.O0 $4,800.00 $2.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $3.50 $2,800.00 16. 900 SF P.C.C. CROSSGU17ER $8.00 $7,200.00 $3.30 $2,970.00 $2,970.00 $6.00 $5,400.00 17. 3 EA ACCESS RAMP INCLUDING RETAINING CURB $1,000.O0 $3,000.00 $675.00 $2,025.00 $2,025.0(] $1,100.00 $3,300.00 18. 50 LF CONSTRUCTCONCRETEBLOCKSLOUGHWALL . $50.00 $2,500.00 $70.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.0¢ $60.00 $3,000.00 19. ! LS {EMOVE & RECONST. PORT. OF ROCKWALL TO MATCH E] $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $7,900.00 $7,900.00 $7,900.0C $1,500.00 $1,500.00 20. 3 EA !RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER AND RECONNECT $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,275.00 $3,825.00 $3,825.00 $2,100.00 $6,300.00 21. 3 EA !SEWER CLEANOUT PER CCWD STANDARD DWG. NO. 21 $1,300.0(] $3,900.00 $525.00 $1,575.00 $1,575.00 $800.00 $2,400.00 22. 123 LE r VCP SEWER LATERAL PER CCWD STD. DWG. NO.15 $70.00~ $8,610.0{] $121.00 $14,883.00 $14,883.00 $90.00 $11,070.00 23. 4 EA REMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. MAILBOX INLIKE AND KIND $500.00: $2,000.0£ $195.00 $780.00 $780.00 $200.00 $800.00 24. 2 EA :{ELOCATE EXISTING TREE $400.00 $800.00 $375.00 $750.00 $750.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 25. lO0 LF RELOCATE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE $20.00 $2,000.00 $7.00 $700.00 $700.00 $12.00 $1,200.00 26 12 EA :{EPLACE INDUCTIVE LOOP DETECTORS. $300.00 $3,600.00 $184.00 $2,208.00 $2,208.00 $275.00 $3,300.0{] 27.' LS REMOVE & REPLACE OAMAGED LSCP & ~RR. ~N LIKE & KIN[ $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,100.00 $1; 100.00 $1,100.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.0C 28. LS STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, POST & SIGNING ETC. $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $7,000.00' $7,000.00 29. 2 EA CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION SIGN $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $400.00 $800.00 $800.00 $400.00 $800.00 30. LS RAFRCCONTROL $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Pa~e 1 TOTAL $330,733.20 $313,174.00 $316,934.00 $335,040.00 ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER STREET) 24TH ST 6TH ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP THE C ~ T Y O F R_AN CiI O CU CAYl O N GA Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY'S HOME CONSORTIUM. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Cooperation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the documents. BACKGROUND In 1990, Congress of the United States enacted the Cranston Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act. Title II of the Act created the "HOME" program, which provides funds to state and local government for the acquisition, rehabilitation, end new construction of affordable housing and tenant-based rental assistance programs. The Act allows local governments to form a consortia for the purpose of receiving and administering HOME funds and programs. In July 1995, the City approved a Cooperation Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the purpose of creating a consortium of cities to receive HOME funds, and thereby participating in the County HOME Consortium. In July 1996, the City approved a 3-year extension to the Cooperation Agreement for the period from October 1, 1996, to September 30, 1999. In June 1999, the City approved a 3-year extension to the Cooperation Agreement for the period from October 1,1999, to September 30, 2002. The proposed Cooperation Agreement will run for an additional 3-year period from October 1,2002, to September 30, 2005. ANALYSIS The County of San Bernardino operates a HOME Consortium with various cities in order to increase the allocation received under the Federal HOME program by allowing the population of these cities to be used in the calculation of the County's allocation. Under the terms of this program, and as CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY HOME CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT June 5, 2002 Page 2 identified in the City's Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan, the County will make its HOME programs (e.g., Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP), Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) Program, Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, Multifamily Rental Property Rehabilitation/Refinance Program, and Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Program) available to participating cities. Participation will require a minimum 25 percent funding match contribution from any HOME eligible match source for each project designat6,d to receive HOME funds, however, existing City and Redevelopment Agency programs already in use in Rancho Cucamonga will qualify for that match. There is no cost to the City or the Redevelopment Agency for inclusion in the program. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG:mlg Attachments: Cooperation Agreement SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM This Agreement is made by and between the Cities of Chino Hills, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands and Rialto (hereinafter called "CITIES") and the County of San Bernardino (hereinafter called "COUNTY"). WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 12701 et seq.) and Federal Regulations have been adopted pursuant thereto, (hereinafter called the "ACT"); and, WHEREAS, Title II of the ACT creates the HOME Investment Partnership Program, (hereinafter called "HOME"), that provides funds to states and local governments for the acquisition, refinance, rehabilitation, and new construction of affordable housing and tenant- based rental assistance; and, WHEREAS, the ACT requires local governments to formulate and submit a Consolidated Plan, (hereinafter called "Con-Plan"), as part of the eligibility requirements for HOME funds in. accordance with section 91.215 of the Consolidated Plan final rule; and WHEREAS, funds from Title II are distributed to metropolitan cities, urban counties, states, and consortia of local governments; and, WHEREAS, the ACT allows local governments to form a consortia for the purpose of receiving and administering HOME funds and carrying out purposes of the ACT; and, WHEREAS, the ACT requires that a local government member of an urban county may participate in a Consortium only through the urban county; and, WHEREAS, the ACT requires that a Consortium shall have one member unit of general local government authorized to act in a representative capacity for all members for the purposes of the ACT and to assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the Consortium's HOME Program is carried out in compliance with the ACT, including requirements concerning the Con- Plan. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that: 1. CITIES and COUNTY will cooperate in the forming of the County of San Bernardino HOME Consortium, (hereinafter called the "CONSORTIUM"), for the purpose of undertaking or assisting in undertaking, HOME-eligible housing assistance activities pursuant to Title II of the ACT, including but not limited to acquiring, refinancing, rehabilitating, and constructing affordable housing, and providing tenant-based rental assistance. 2. COUNTY shall act as the representative member of the CONSORTIUM for purposes of the ACT and assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the CONSORTIUM's HOME Program is carded out in compliance with the requirements of the Program, including requirements concerning a Con-Plan. 3. CITIES shall provide to COUNTY, all necessary information and documentation as requested by COUNTY for incorporation into COUNTY's Con-Plan in compliance with Program Requirements. 4. CITIES 'shall have thirty (30) calendar days tO approve the portions of the Con-Plan which pertain to the CITIES before COUNTY submits the final Con-Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). COUNTY shall incorporate CITIES' changes in Con-Plan, if any, provided that they meet HOME Requirements. CITIES shall identify any areas designated for affordable housing activities within their jurisdiction. CITIES shall provide maps and/or detailed descriptions of such areas upon execution of this document. 5. CITIES shall approve each project funded with competitive HOME funds within their city boundaries prior to COUNTY approving funding of such projects, provided that the CITIES' approval or disapproval does not obstruct the implementation of the approved Con-Plan. 6. CITIES shall designate the City Administrator, or his/her designee, as the CITIES' representative to whom all notices and communications from COUNTY shall be directed. COUNTY's duty to notify CITIES shall be complete when the communication is sent to the designated representative. It is the exclusive duty of the designated representative to notify the appropriate individuals and departments within the CITIES. 7. To carry out activities .under this Agreement, COUNTY shall allocate HOME funds received under the ACT to those HOME activities described in the COUNTY's Con-Plan. If necessary to meet HOME Requirements, funds will be realloeated by COUNTY in accordance with such needs, objectives, or strategies as COUNTY shall decide. In preparing such needs, objectives, or strategies, COUNTY shall consult with the CITIES before making its determinations. COUNTY shall fund HOME-eligible projects within CITIES boundaries on a first-come, first-served basis. 8. CITIES shall contribute a minimum 25 percent funding match contribution from any HOME-eligible match source for each project designated to receive HOME funds. 9. COUNTY and CITIES shall comply with all applicable requirements of the ACT and its regulations in utilizing basic grant funds under the ACT and shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with COUNTY certifications required by the ACT. COUNTY and CITIES will comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Execntive Order 11988, the Fair Housing Act, and other applicable federal laws. CITIES agree that HOME funding for activities in, or in support of, CITIES are prohibited if CITIES do not affirmatively further fair housing within their own jurisdictions or impede COUNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification. Each party to this Agreement shall affirmatively further fair housing. 10. CITIES shall provide COUNTY with all information concerning CITIES and the activities CITIES cany out under this Agreement which COUNTY requires to prepare: 1) documents required to be submitted to HUD, 2) annual HOME Performance Report, and 3) such other documents as COUNTY may require to carry out eligible housing activities or meet federal requirements. All information shall be submitted on forms prescribed by COUNTY. In addition, CITIES agree to make available upon request all records concerning the activities carried out under this Agreement for inspection by COUNTY or federal officials during regular business hours. 11. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITIES shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses of any type, and from liability fbr any fines, penalties or damages of any type, resulting from CITIES' performance of this Agreement and caused by any act or omission of CITIES, including failure to comply with any requirement of the ACT or the HOME Program described herein except to the extent that any such claims, suits, actions, losses, or liability arises fiom any act or omission of COUNTY. 12. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall defend, indenmify and hold harmless CITIES, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses of any type, and from liability for all fines, penalties or damages of any type, resulting from COUNTY's performance of this Agreement and caused by any act or omission of COUNTY, including failure to comply with any requirement of the ACT or the HOME Program described herein, except to the extent that any such claims, suits, actions, losses, or liability arises from any act or omission of CITIES. 13. This Agreement shall go into effect immediately upon execution by all signatories to the Agreement and shall continue in full force and in effect until all activities funded under the terms of this Agreement, and any income generated from the expenditure of such funds, are expended and the funded activities are completed. CITIES are included in the CONSORTIUM for a period of three (3) federal fiscal years commencing on October 1, 2002, through September 30, 2005. No CONSORTIUM member may withdraw from the Agreement while the Agreement remains in effect. 14. This Agreement authorizes the COUNTY, as the lead entity, to amend the CONSORTIUM Agreement on behalf of the entire CONSORTIUM to add new members to the CONSORTIUM. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM SIGNATURE PAGE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date Mayor Attest: Date City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Date City Attorney SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM SIGNATURE PAGE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRED AGUIAR Date Chairman, Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD J. RENEfi BAST[AN Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bemardino By: Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ALAN K. MARKS COUNTY COUNSEL By:. Deputy County Counsel Date R A N C H O C U C A M O N G ^ ENGINEERING DE PARTFIENT Sa fRepor DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS FROM 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH OF THE METROLINK RAILROAD TRACKS NORTH OF 8TM STREET RECOMMENDATION: ~ Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agreement for replacement of overhead with underground distribution facilities between the City and Southern California Edison Company and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Project will complete the Lower Hermosa Avenue storm drain, street widening, railroad and utility underground improvements from 350 feet south of 8th Street to north of the Metrolink railroad tracks north of 8ta Street. Southern California Edison Company prepared plans for the placement of the underground conduit to be used for their existing overheads along Hermosa Avenue and 8~h Street, and the plans were made a part of the City's bid package. The agreement covers the work and costs by the City and Southern California Edison in removing the existing overhead lines and placing them in the new underground conduit. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Res@e~tt~,lly submitted, WilliamS. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map Resorution FO 8TH ~T ~ ~u ~TH ~T z 4TPI ST ? I~OJ E CT o,,^~,o CITY LIMIT LOCATION CITY OF EANCH0 CUCAMONGA LO]l~lt ~0~h. A~qq]U'~. PNA~q~ 1T ST. WIDEN, S.D., T.S., UPGRADE E/R TRACKS & UG UTfl,ITIES S/O 8TH ST. TO N/O METROI, JNK TRACKS N/O 8TH ST. VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. (~-//7 ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES ALONG HERMOSA AVENUE AND 8TM STREET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Southern California Edison Company for the replacement of overhead with underground distribution facilities for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Agreement is for the placement of underground conduit and substructures by the City and for the replacement of the overhead with underground electrical facilities by Southern California Edison Company along Hermosa Avenue and 8th Street NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Agreement for the replacement of the overhead with underground distribution facilities be hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /._5/ R A N C H O C U C a M O N G a COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF FIVE YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT WITH 'I'HE UPLAND ASSISTANCE LEAGUE FOR THE USE OF THEIR PARKING LOT FOR SENIOR CENTER PARKING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached lease agreement that renews the City's current five-year lease with the Upland Assistance League for anotller five years. BACKGROUND Five years ago, the City was in need of additional parking space due to continued growth of senior participation at the Senior Center. The City then entered into a five-year agreement with the Upland Assistance League for the daily (M-F) use of their back parking lot. The current agreement will expire June 4, 2002. Senior programs have continued to grow at about 20% per year and even though the City has constructed an additional east parking lot a couple of years ago; there is still need of the Upland Assistance League's parking lot. The Upland Assistance League has agreed to allow the City to use the same parking lot for another five years. The agreement does include some periodic maintenance from city staff that is consistent with the level of maintenance currently provided. FISCAL IMPACT The Upland Assistance League has agreed to keep the lease amount unchanged at $1,200 per year. RespeL.,~ ~~ed, Kevin I lcArdle Community Services Director LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF UPLAND This Lease is made and entered into this 4* day of June, 2002, by and between the ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF UPLAND, a California 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation ("LEAGUE" hereinafter) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("CITY" hereinafter). A. Recitals. (i) LEAGUE owns that certain parcel of real property generally located at the northeasterly comer of Malvem Avenue and Salina Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth at length. Hereinafter in this Lease, said parcel of real property shall be referred to as the "Lot". (ii) The Lot is utilized as a parking area by LEAGUE. (iii) CITY operates a Senior Center on property located to the east of the Lot and desires to utilize the Lot for overflow parking for the Senior Center. (iv) The Lot requires certain physical maintenance and CITY, in conjunction with the making of this Lease, is willing to perform maintenance thereon as described herein. (v) All legal prerequisites to the making of this Lease have occurred. B. Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the LEAGUE and CITY agree as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Lease. 2. LEAGUE hereby leases to CITY, for the use(s) set forth herein, the Lot for a term of five (5) years from June 5, 2002 to June 4, 2007. 3. CITY agrees to pay LEAGUE the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per month as rent for the use of the Lot. Said rent shall be paid on or before the flint working day of each calendar month. 4. CITY shall be permitted to utilize the Lot for parking for employees, guests and users of its Senior Center whenever necessary. Lease Agreement City of Rancho Cucamonga and Assistance League of Upland June, 2002 5. CITY agrees that LEAGUE may utilize the Lot for its activities not in conflict herewith and, further, shall permit the use for LEAGUE events upon not less than seven (7) days written notice given as required hereunder. 6. LEAGUE agrees that, during the days when in use, LEAGUE shall not preclude ingress to or egress, from the Lot except as necessary for improvement, repair or maintenance work thereon. LEAGUE shall give CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice of any anticipated work or improvements to be conducted or caused by LEAGUE in order to minimize disruption of use by CITY. 7. CITY agrees to clean the Lot, as needed, of trash and debris and to semi- annually eradicate weeds thereon. 8. The parties agree that any damage or injury to the LOT caused by the acts or omissions of either party shall be remedied by the responsible party. 9. CITY shall defend, indemnify and save harmless LEAGUE, its officials, officers and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons ,ar property, including the payment by CITY of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of the acts and/or omissions of CITY pursuant to this LEASE. 10. LEAGUE shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by LEAGUE of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of the acts and/or omissions of LEAGUE pursuant to this Lease. 11. A: LEAGUE makes no representation concerning the Lot or that the soil and geology thereof conform to the requirements of CITY. CITY shall not bear the costs of correcting any adverse soil, surface or subsurface conditions on the Lot, whether visible to the naked eye or not, and CITY may terminate this Lease, if in its sole determination, the Lot is not suitable for the use(s) intended by CITY. B. LEAGUE also further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, demands, actions, judgments, causes of action, assessments, penalties, costs and expenses (including without limitation, the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, expert witnesses and accountants) and all foreseeable and unforeseeable consequential damages which might arise or Lease Agreement City of Rancho Cucamonga and Assistance League of Upland June, 2002 be asserted against CITY as a result of a claimed violation of any and all present and future federal, state and local laws (whether under common law, statute, rule, regulation or otherwise), including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C..~..t. 9601 through 9657, inclusive; Transportation of Hazardous Materials and Wastes (HMTA), 49 U.S.C. App..~.~. 1801 through 1813, inclusive; the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. ~.4. 6901 through 6992, inclusive; 40 C.F.R. Parts 260 through 271, inclusive; the California Hazardous Substance Account Act (HSAA), California Health and Safety Code .~,I. 25300 through 25395,, inclusive; the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA), California Health and Safety Code 25100 through 25249, inclusive; the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act,, California Water Code 4.~ 13000 through 13999.16, inclusive; and the Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA), California Health and Safety Code ~..~. 24280 through 24299.7, inclusive, all as the same may be amended from time to time, relating to the environment or to any hazardous substance, activity or material connected with the condition of the Property arising out of LEAGUE'S activities or ownership of the Lot occurring prior to CITY'S use hereunder. 12. This Lease may only be amended in writing duly executed by the authorized officer(s) of the respective parties. 13. Upon the conclusion of the term hereof, CITY shall have the option to extend this Lease for successive five (5) year terms with a rental adjustment not to exceed the percentage increase, if any, in the cost of living computed as set forth in & ~14. Said option(s) to renew shall be exercised in writing, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the initial term or successor term, if any, hereunder in the manner set forth herein for notice,,;. 14. Commencing with each new term hereunder, CITY shall pay as additional rent an amount computed in accordance with the following provisions: A. LEAGUE shall compute the increase, if any, of the cost of living during the preceding term based upon the Consumer Price Index for the San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area (1982=100), hereinafter called Ythe Index", published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The Index number indicated in the column entitled YAll Items" for the fifty-ninth (59th) month of each term 3 /55 Lease Agreement City of Rancho Cucamonga and Assistance League of Upland June, 2002 hereunder shall be the ¥current Index number" and the corresponding Index number for the first (lst) month of each term hereunder, shall be the base Index number. The current Index number shall be divided by the base Index number, then the resulting fraction shall be multiplied by the basis rent payable hereunder and the resulting amount shall be the increase required to be determined hereunder. B. If publication of the Index shall be discontinued, the parties shall' accept comparable statistics for the cost of living in the San Bemardino Metropolitan Statistical Area as shall then be computed and published by an agency of the United States, or if none, by a respected financial periodical selected by the parties, or if they cannot agree, by arbitration. The matter shall be submitted for decision to the American Arbitration Association in :accordance with the then roles of said Association and the decision of the arbitrators shall be binding upon the parties. The cost of said arbitration shall be borne by the non-prevailing party. 15. Any and all notices, statements and written communications between the parties hereto shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (4811 hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth below: City of Rancho Cucamonga Assistance League of Upland Attention: City Manager Attention: President Post Office Box 807 Post Office Box 927 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Upland, CA 91785 16. This Lease contains the entire agreement between the parties. No promise, representation, warranty, or covenant not included in this Lease has been or is relied on by either party. Each party has relied on its own examination of this Lease, the counsel of its own advisors, and the warranties, representations, and covenants in the Lease itself. The failure or refusal of either party to inspect the Lot or improvements, to read the Lease or other documents or to obtain legal or other advice relevant to this transaction constitutes a waiver of any objection, contention, or claim that might have been based on such reading, inspection, or advice. 4 /5(o Lease Agreement City of Rancho Cucamonga and Assistance League of Upland June, 2002 WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into the Lease as of the date first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation By: By: ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF UPLAND, a California 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation APPROVED AS TO FORM James L. Markman City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Site M~p: R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~UBLIC LI BRAR¥ Memorandum DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT REPRESENTING A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY AND VARIOUS SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN SUPPORT OF LIBRARY SERVICES TO YOUNGSTERS RECOMMENDATION That the Council approve the attached agreement outlining a parmership between the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library and the following School Districts: Alta Loma School District Central School district Cucamonga School District Etiwanda School District BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The attached agreement outlines areas of partnership and mutual cooperation between the School Districts representing the K-12 grades serving the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This agreement will better position the City in respect to the application process currently underway by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library to qualify for California Public Library Construction bond act funds. The application encourages the submittal of a partnership agreement, binding only in the event that the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library receives a grant. The partnership involves programming support, consideration of joint purchasing, promotion of library programs and events and other areas of cooperation. FISCAL IMPACT: No . Respectfully submitted, Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director /5¢ PUBLIC LI BRARY Memorandum DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SUPPORT OF LIBRARY GRANT APPLICATION RECOMMENDATION That the Council approve a resolution certifying their support of an application for a l~ant award from the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 to be submitted on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library will be applying for California Public Library Construction bond act funds on June 14th, 2002 for the project to be called the Victoria Gardens Library. The application requires the submittal of a Resolution, binding only in the event that the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library receives a grant. Staff believes the project has merit and can be competitive in the state-wide grant process. Staff will work hard to present the best application for consideration in this highly competitive arena. Respectfully submitted, Deborah Kaye Clark Library Director RESOLUTION NO. 02-186 _~¢.,¢}0~--,()~¢~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS, AND PUBLIC LIBRARY OPERATION WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is applying for funding for the new library facility under the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, WHEREAS, the Library Bond Act regulations require the City Council to certify and approve all elements of the Project application being submitted for funding, WHEREAS, the City understands that they have to certify all aspects of the application, and pass a resolution to that effect, WHEREAS, all these certifications and approvals must be done before the application can be submitted and considered for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (a) makes a commitment to provide the local matching fund amount identified in the project budget, as required by Education Code section 19995(a), including and identifying the amounts to be credited to local matching funds pursuant to section 19995(c) and (d) in the amount of $4,174,524; (b) makes a commitment to provide supplemental funds necessary to complete the project at the level stated in the project budget, in the amount of $14,846,963; (c) certifies that the local matching and supplemental funds specified will be available when needed to meet cash flow requirements for the project; · (d) certifies the accuracy and truthfulness of all information submitted in the Application Form and the required supporting documents; (e) certifies the project budget as stated in the application in the amount of $26,774,175; (f) makes a commitment to operate the completed facility and provide public library direct service, unless the public library shall be operated in whol,e by a jurisdiction other than the applicant; (g) and makes the commitment that the facility shall be dedicated to public library direct service use for a period of 40 years following the completion of the project, regardless of any operating agreements the applicant may have with other jurisdictions or parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to the above commitments, conditional upon receiving a full grant award from the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2002 RESOLUTION 'NO. 02-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS, AND PUBLIC LIBRARY OPERATION WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is applying for funding for tile new library facility under the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, WHEREAS, the Library Bond Act regulations require the City Council to certify and approve all elements of the Project application being submitted for funding, WHEREAS, the City understands that they have to certify all aspects of the application, and pass a resolution to that effect, WHEREAS, all these certifications and approvals must be done before the application can be submitted and considered for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (a) makes a commitment to provide the local matching fund amount identified in the project budget, as required by Education Code section 19995(a), including and identifying the amounts to be credited to local matching funds pursuant to section 19995(c) and (d) in the amount of $3,700,000; (b) makes a commitment to provide supplemental funds necessary to complete the project at the level stated in the project budget, in the amount of $15,544,000; (c) certifies that the local matching and supplemental funds specified will be available when needed to meet cash flow requirements for the project; (d) certifies the accuracy and truthfulness of all information submitted in the Application Form and the required supporting documents; (e) certifies the project budget as stated in the application in the amount of $21,9'16,390; (f) makes a commitment to operate the completed facility and provide public library direct service, unless the public library shall be operated in whole by a jurisdiction other than the applicant; (g) and makes the commitment that the facility shall be dedicated to public library direct service use for a period of 40 years following the completion of the project, regardless of any operating agreements the applicant may have with other jurisdictions or parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to the above commitments, conditional upon receiving a full grant award from the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2002 R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA Staff Report DA'~: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-49, SUBMITTED BY EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC., LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ALTA LOMA DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for CUP 99-49 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 99-49, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Ddve, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Councii release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Evergreen Devco, Inc. 2920 East Camelback Road, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ Release: Faithful Performance Bond SSB 322527 $48,400.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond SSB 322527 $ 4,840.00 Resp~o~u~ly submitted, Williarr~i/.. 0 Nell City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-49 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 99-49, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT STREET IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (NUMBER SA 3911), ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND (NUMBER SA3846) AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (NUMBER 3913) PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FUTURE BUS BAY FOR DR 00-31, SUBMITTED BY JEFFERSON AT EMPIRE LAKES, L.P., LOCATED ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF SIXTH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 00-31 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 00-31, located northwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements and construct a bus bay. The street improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond, accept the Maintenance Bond and retain the Faithful Performance Bond for the bus bay. Developer: Jefferson at Empire Lakes, L.P. 8910 University Center Lane, Suite 150 San Diego, CA 92122 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: DR 00-31 June 5, 2002 Page 2 Release: Faithful Performance Bond SA3911 $255,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond SA3846 $ 62,630.00 Retain: Faithful Performance Bond SA3913 $ 52,330.00 ResPectfully submitted, Willia~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~)2-' ~/' ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-31, EXCLUDING THE FUTURE BUS BAY, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 00-31, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A ~ N GIN E E l~ I N C L) E pAI,~'I' Staf:f Report DA'IE: .June 5, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AS A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-59, SUBMITTED BY OPUS WEST CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EIGHTH STREET AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 00-59 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 00-59, located on the southeast corner of Eighth Street and Rochester Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council retain the existing Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond. Developer: Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation 3030 Main Street, Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92614 Faithful Performance Bond: #92921148 $207,800.00 Res/p..ect~ully submitted, Willia~J. O'Neil "( CC City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. O2. - / ~2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-59 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 00-59, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /72-, R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A StaffR ort DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-73, SUBMITTED BY PARAGON ROCHESTER, LLC, LOCATED ON CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, FROM SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET TO TERMINUS OF ROCHESTER COURT RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 00-73 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 00-73, located on Charles Smith Avenue, from south of Sixth Street to terminus of Rochester Court, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Paragon Rochester, LLC 319 East Palm, Second Floor Placentia, CA 92870 Release: Faithful Performance Bond BCZ1690990 $78,232.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond BCZ1699582 $10,000.00 Re~c-'tfully submitted, Williai~3/J. O'Neil City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 02- / 8.,.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-73 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 00-73, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /75 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT StaffRepo DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Project Manager '~/~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 01-084 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $199,970.85 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the Installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at Various Locations, Contract No. 01-084, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $164,110.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $199,970.85. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is ' $199,970.85, which included six contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 21.93%. In addition to some minor changes such as realignment due to conflicting utilities, the more significant changes included adding some pull boxes, upgrading some pull boxes and upgrading the 12-strand cable to 96-strand in some areas to facilitate the City's future needs. The original amount approved by Council was $180,412.00 ($164,011.00 plus 10%). Respecff~,y submitted, WJO:MP/RO:Is Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS LOCATION &VICINTY MAP Base Line Road LIBRARY ~) ~ ~ 1'-~ FIRE STATION San Be ~ardino Road ~. Foothill Boulevard Cl~ HALLi ~ ~1 ~rrow Hi~hwa~ SENIOR 9th Street' CENTER YARD -- -- Indicates Fiber Optic Cabling Route RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 01-084 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at Various Locations, Contract No. 01-084, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~NGINEEI~I~G D~PAI~TI~NT S g:f Report DA3E: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 01-083 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $553,629.76 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the Hedtage Park Tot Lot Renovation Project, Contract No. 01-083, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $520,635.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $55,362.98, 35 days after acceptance. Aisc, approve the final contract amount of $553,629.76. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $553,629.76, which included two contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 6.37%. The original amount approved by Council was $572,534.60 ($520,486.00 plus 10%). WJO:KME/RO:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. O2- /~.~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 01-083 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Heritage Park Tot Lot Renovation Project, Contract No. 01-083, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RAN C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O~eil, City Engineer BY: Wait Stickney, Associate Engineer SUIIJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GENERAL. CITY LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve a resolution adopting the updated General City Master Plan of Drainage Report, and that City Council approve one of the two resolutions presented establishing an updated drainage improvement fee for all development within the Generai City Locai Drainage Area. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The General City Local Drainage Area of the City encompasses that area generally west of Deer Creek Channel. It is intended to address any area of the City that is outside a master planned development such as Victoria or Terra Vista, or not included in an drainage assessment district, or outside the Etiwanda area that due to its unique drainage requirements has its own master plan. The Master Plan of Drainage performs three objectives. First it identifies those areas of the City where nonexistent drainage improvements are necessary. That necessity is based on a need to protect the City from flooding. Secondly, it addresses a need to provide drainage improvements to accommodate future development. And third, it identifies facilities needed to relieve existing streets and drainage facilities that are overtaxed. In 1985 the City revised its General City Drainage Fee to $5,000 per acre. Since that time the fee has remained unchanged. Recently the City reviewed and updated its master plan study for the Generai City area and based on the adjustment of proposed drainage facilities sizes and locations, as well as CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE FEES June 5, 2002 Page 2 the update of the cost of installing those facilities, has calculated an updated fee amount of $15,300 per acre. This amount represents a fair share amount for development in the General City drainage area. The drainage fee is the developers fair share cost of the General City drainage improvements. The resolution provides this fee will be adjusted on an annual basis according to the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles. Staff has presented the City Council two options of implementing a drainage fee increase. One option is to phase in an increase by raising the fee from the current $5,000 to $8,500 on September 1, 2002, then bringing the fee to'the calculated amount of $15,300 on January 1, 2003. The second option would not phase any increase, but rather raise the fee to the $15,300 amount on September 1, 2002. In either option annual review and adjustment would commence on January 1, 2004. Respectfully submitted, ,. City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw Attachments JUN-~5-2002 17:~5 MEAD INU~ST~TS 425 454 G264 P.02 MEAD .......... INVESTMENTS ~ -- 12015 NE B~ S~reet, Suite #5 Bellevue, WA gBO0$ Tel (425) 455-54.58 Juno 5, 2002 Fax (425) 454-6264 Council Members City of Rancho Cueamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cu"~mo.nga, GA 91729-0507 p~: Increase of Drainage F==s Dem' Council Members, We havc bean commercial properly owners in thc City of Rancho Cuc~ nonga for over 10 years. We=have owned a variety of both buildings and land. We ~hi~lc 'ery highly of the city and will con, hue to invest in your community. We have been taken offguard by your recent resolution to increase ctra aage fees in an area that we own 20 acres and undersUmd a vote might occur on this re .olution at tonight's coundl meeting. We were not notified of this issue until figt: before ),our workshOp was to be held on April 29m, 20(}2. Because we live in WaS ingten the mail ' our most rccent did not get to us.in tim= so as w= co=Id pardciI~t~ ~n that worI~0~. ~ l~acr ~ith reF;~rds to tonight's m~fing <fid not g~ to us unfi! Mond=y ~ ff tMs w=~k I~h~g mailed onMay 25~ yet written on May 23ra and once again we will be xnable to be there on such short notice. Where as we do not openly appose the action being considered we fee] very strongly that any increase in/ees should not occttr for at least six moxnth's from toni Jar's meeting in order for tax paying property owners such as ourselves to factor the fa ~ to any plays we have for the property. We currently have a variety ofcomraitments th t were negotiated before our knowledge of this aclion an6 to increase fees prior to the si nonths would greatly impact us. We a/so feel very strongly that any increase be pha .d in over time. Pan of our concern also relateS to the accounting of these fees since x~ pay into a fund. We have not been given any aecom~ing of the fund, the proposed pro. :ts and the antlclpat0ed needs of the fund. We strongly urge you to wait six months before raising the fee so th~ issu~ .tan be resolved.. Thanks you for your consideration Since~ly, Clinton T. Mead TOT(:~ P. O2 blanchard * hamilton telephone 626-449-506B tel·fax 626-449-B037 To: Cler~and CityManagerofthe From: Lonnie C. Blanchar~ III City ~f Rancho Cucamonga Fnx: 909-477-2846 Pages: $ (includlno corel Phone: Date: 6105102 Re: Objebtion to Resolution8 02-062 CC; and dl2-062 ............. · Comment, si Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with your directions to me, I am sending the attached la :er for presentatiori to the Mayor and City Council fo'r the headng of the abow referenced r!natter~ that is scheduled for thts~evenino at 7:00 pm. As i understand It, by faxing this to you, it shall be considered part of the p~ )lic testimony reilated to the~e matters, Ploase call rbe if you have any question~ or comments. Respectfully, Lonnie C. Blanchard III 500 c~llfornlll lerri,"e, piIede.a, ¢,~llfornl. 911~05 JUN--05--02 11C~9 AM ~LA~CHAR~ 626 449 5068 P.02 Confidentiality Statement ThL~ m~ ~$ im',~nded ~ly ~ ~s use of the individug~ o~ e~tl~y to ',.;,~l~h II ~ pddre~.4~d snd r~, eortta!n InformaU~ that ~prhQe~ed, ~On?mden~l ar~ ~erll~t fTO~ d~r.;k:~ure under ~l:~l~abl? law.. If the re~r toleph~rm and ret~m ~he o~lnal message to ~ at the above address v~a ~e US Pm~lal Scm'ice. / / blanchar~ · hamilton page 2 ~512002 blan(:hnrd · hamilton mttorneyl at law tonnle G, blenGhilrd Ill talephDne e26-.~4g-508B filofax eZ6-44g-5057 cellular $01-61,:g-SS51 e-mill lo n nlec bile nc h er d Illl~min.corn June 5, 2002 Honorable Mayor a~d City Council Members City of Rancho Cud~monga 10500 Civic Center! Drive P.O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamong'~, CA 91729 ViA Facsimile to City Clerk's Office at (909) 477-2846 and by Hand Delivdry to the City Council Meeting to be Held on June 5, 20~)2 Re: ObJectl 3n to Resolutions 02-081 and 02-062 of the City Cou~n¢il of the City ¢ f Rancho Cucsmonga, Adopting the Updated Gene~l City Master Plan of Drainage Report and U.p. dated Drainage Improverne~ It Fees For All Development Within the General City LeGal Drain iga Area Dear Ladies and G, intlemen: I represent Steven ?rihisztal, who is the owner of approximately 4.16 acres of proper~y in the City bf Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), parcel numbers: 021 ~9 - 171- 39 and 0209 * !171- 40 ("Prihisztal's Property"). Pr~h~sztal s Property{ ~s ~ncluded ~n and ~dent~hed as part of Acreage y he City Council in its r~port entitled "General City Area Drainage Fees Adjustrr ant - 2001' (the "Report"} I am writing on behalf of Mr. Prihisztal Io object to the adjustment of fees th, ~t are contained in the Re,or1 (the" Fee Adjustments"). In this regard, I have spa ten with the City Clerk's{Office and have been advised that: (i) this objection m~ y be submitted in writing ~to the City Clerk's Office by facsimile or by submission )y hand delivery at the[City Coundl's Meeting, to be held on June 5, 2002; an{I (ii) written objection m~y be considered public testimony in lieu of someone ac ually speaking for Mr. Prlhisztal at the City Council Meeting. 500 callfornl, terrece~ pesadenl, callfornl. 91t0 For the reasons se forth below, Mr. Prihisztal respectfully objects to the F~ Adjustments, which will result in his having to pay a fee equal to $15,300.0~ per acre (already well above the Report's estimated costs associated with the d?velopment - seelsection 3 of this letter), because the methodology usedlby the C~ty Council as set forth in the Report to determine the Fee Adjustments (tl~e "Fee Estimating M~thodology"), does not comport with requisite legal stand~rds. 1. The Law Re, quires that Fees Imposed on Developers Be Reaso~ able. California G~vernment Code, Section 66001 ("Mitigation Fee Act"), tares, in relevant p~rt, as fellows: "...Fee as a bondition of approval; agency requirements (a) In any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition! of approval of a development project by a local agency on or after JanL ~ary 1, 1989, the local agency shall do all of the followin (1) Identil y, the purpose of the fee. (2) Identil ~, the use to which the fee is to be put. If th.e use is finar cing public fac ilities, the facilities shall be identified. That ~dentification may, but need ~ot, be made by reference to a capital improvement pla ~ as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general dr speci!ic plan requirements, or may be made in other p Jblic documen :s that ;dentify the public facilities for wh. ich the fee is ch ~rged. (3) Deter nine how them Is a reasonable relationship betwee 1 the fee's uss and the type of development project on which the ee Is Imposed (4) Deter~ nine how there Is a reasonable relationship between th ~ need for the pu olic facility and the type of development project on whic i the fee is im osed..." [Emphasis added,] When deterr~ining whether or not fe.e.s charged to land developers a legally permi~ssible, there are a long hne of cases that have int~erpret~ ~d, the Fee Mitigatic~n Act and related statutes, including the Subdivismn M~ p Act, and their res~3ectlve predecessors and progeny. From K{~lber[v. The City of Upland, 155 CaI.App.2d 631 (1958), whi¢ held that fee provisions must not be fun,d rai?ing methods for purposes of meeting the luture needs of an entire c~ly, but must, instead, "...be reasonably r~quired by the type and use of the subdivision..." at iss[ (Kelber, at 6~8), to Bixel v. City of Los.AngeleS, 216 Cal.App.3d 120 (1989,), whic~ set forth the standard by which fees are held to be permissible d~nder California and United States law, the courts have learly and consistently held that: "...[t]h~e fee must not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the servic/~ fc)r which the fee is charged, and the ba~is for deterrn ning blanchard · ha[milton paae 2 2002 JUN--05--02 1i ~4~ AM ~LANCHAR~ ~26 449 5068 P.05 the amount of the fee allocated to the developer must bear a air and reasonable relation to the developer's benefit from the fe )..." Bixel,~at 1218. 2. The Fee Es mating Methodology Lacks Evidence to Suggest th at the Fee to be C larged to Prlhlaztal's Property Is Reasonably Relate to the Aotual t oat of the Particular Burden to the City that Will Be Created by he Development of I=rlhleztal's Property. It is evide ~t from an anal/sis of the Fee Estimating Methodology that, it is at bas, very crude and ir precise. The Methodology first breaks down the "9,159 94 Fee Appllca le Acreage" into "10 Watershed Areas." The Watershe J Areas rang~ in size from 244.80 acres to 2,550,5 acres. The Metho~tology then crudely estimates the drainage costs of each of the 10 Watersh ed Areas, adds :he drainage costs of all 10 Watershed Areas together End, divides the total of the drainage cost by the 9,159.94 F ~e then,, crudel, Apphcable ,~ ;reage. In doing so, there is absolutely no assurance at any particul~ r property owner Is not paying amounts unreasonably disproportiol, ate to the land that such property owner owns. Prihisztal's I~ roperty is in Watershed Area IV and Mr. Prihisztat own~ a total of appr ximately 4.16 acres. Given this ,Methodology, he has n ~ assurance ti at he is not significantly overpaying for lhe drainage co,, ts that are heir allocated to his undeveloped acreage. 3. The $15,301~,00 Fee Per Acre Unduly Burdens Watershed Area Il L By the City~--s oW ~ estimates, the total drainage costs for Watershed Are ~ IV are $12,068 731.88. Based upon a total of 890,42 Fee Applicable Acreage, th~ City's estimate of cost per acre is $13,554.20. As a re~ ~ult, the propos~ d fee of $15,300.00 Is $1,745.80 per acrs more than' he estimated ¢ ~st. Because of this, it appears that the owners of Wati ~rshed Area IV will I e charg?d at least $1.55 million dollars more than wha the City believe., the drainage costs of Watershed Area IV will actually t ~, On Its face, Pri i;sztel's Property estimated fee la disproportionate 'o Mr. Prihlsztel's ,~stlmatad usa. 4. The Storm I~rain Cost Estimates of Watershed Area IV Appear Be "'Swag" Estimates. The following are examples: s. 26 OL~t Of the 33 RCP (Reinforced Concrete Pipe) Units Ich Serve as the Foundation of the Storm Drain Costs Are Adml Itedly "Interpolations" and Are Not Based on Any Hi ~rd Data: According to the Report, the foundation of the Storm D 'sin Cost, stimate methodology is the "R.C.P. Unit Cost Breakdo~ vn." In the matrix of RCP Unit Coal;, there are a total of 33 RCP szes listed Yet only 7 of the estimates are based on data as opp0 md to "interI ;)lation." This is clearly admitted by the City in tile foil; ~'ing blanchard · h milton page 3 6,~/2002 language of Note (b) of the RCP Unit Cost Breakdown: "...U ~ble to toc~te unit prices for all RCP sizes, so us,ed, unit prices for located RCP size and interpolated the remaining prices..." ,~ a result[ the cost estimates of 26 out of the 33 price estimates ~ re simpl~, guesses. b. The ~emalnlng 7 RCP Price Estimates Which Are Based LJpon Data ~_re Baaed Upon Data Which la Between 6 and 8 Ye; rs Old, iThe fact that the only hard data that is used, is potentk ly stale,lis clearly admitted by the City in the following language 3f Note (a) of the RCP Unit Cost Breakdown; ",..Unit Prices for RCP'$ obtained from bid summaries of 19S4, 1995 and 1996 pro jet, ts..." c. The '~ RCP Unit Price Estimates Do Not Properly Take Iht Acco Jnt Quantity Differences: The following language of r eta (c) of the RCP Unit Cost Breakdown clearly shows that the Cty did not u= ,e a reasonable methodology for taking into account pri, iing differ, ~ntials resulting from different quantities of RCP require~t for the p~ operties: "...Tried to unit price quantities in excess of 4 ~)0 L.F, t-ut in case of 54" and 60" RCP had to settle for less.,." '~'he meth( ,dology results in a "one price fits alt" approach to pricin ;;I of all quanl ties of linear feet of RCP installed. In Watershed Area IV, the N )de to Node linear foot calculations vary from 280 feet ~ 1550 feet. Surely, the quantity pricing discounts for both 280 feet nd 1550 .'eat cannot be the same. d. The ,~ term Drain Estimates in Watershed Area IV Are Be: ed On "Rou 1d-Number Estimates" of the Length of RCP Requlr ~d, With i aspect to all of the 890.42 Fee Applicable Acres in War ~rshed Area V, every single "length" estimate used in the cost catcu ation is a "r 3und-number" ending in a "0." Certainly, there must be distar cea in Watershed Area IV that do not end in 10-foot increr lents. Because these estimates are all based on distar ces in 10-fo; ~t estimates, one can have little confidence about the o~ er-all accur ~cy of the cost estimates. 5. Trapezoidal Channel Costs Estimates Also Appear to Be Based On Cost Estlm; tea "Out of Thin Air." All Trapezoidal Channel Costs in the Report appe ~r to be based on a price of "$500.00" ,per cubic yard. '1 he Report fails 1 ~ explain where this "$500.00" per cubic yard figure cor les from. in sh(~rt, the number appears just to come "out of thin air." 6. Reinforced ;onerete Box Cost Estimates Also Appear to Be Be pad On "Out of"hln Air" Cost Estimates. All Reinforced Concrete B Costs in the :~eport appear to be based on a pries of "$500.00" per ~ blanchard., h~mllton page 4 /2002 ~ JUN--05--02 11:41 AM ~LANCHARD G2G 449 50G0 P.O? yard. The Repod fails to explain where this "$500.00" per cubic yal figure come~ from. Again, the number appears just to come "out of qin air," MoreoVer, the fact that the Trapezoidal Channels costs, are ex~ ctly the same as[Reinfomed Concrete Boxes costs further calls ~nto que: Ition the credibility of the cost estimates. 7. The Fee Applicable Acreage Calculations Appear to Be "Swag" Estimates. ~or each of the 10 Watershed Areas, the Report estime that 20% of ~,ach acre will not be subject to the burden of drainage. In doing so, the Report does not state why or how it has made this assumption. In fact, the Report simply states: "...Assume that 20% of area zoned f ~r development will be used for street improvements, vi .rious easements, ;tc.,,," As a result, this estimating methodology appear ~ to be nothing rr ore than a guess and clearly does not in any way take I '~to account any differences that exist property-to-property or area-to-ar{ a. 8. The Cost E~tlmatlng Methodologies for the RCP's, the Trapazoi !al Channels e~d the Reinforced Concrete Boxes Each Crudely Es' mate "Other Co?Is" to be 25% of the Calculated Estimates, In each ~ the cost estima!i~g methodologies, 25% is simply added for "other cost.' This is in ad :ition to a 10% "Construction Contingency" on both the calculated c, st and the 25% for other costs. These types of "round. number" or' )ut of thin air" estimates do not and cannot provide a p~ )arty owner with ~ ~y type of credible assurance that it is paying amounts reasonably ~ elated to the actual costs of the improvements caused ' the developmen: of its property, 9, The Cost E~tlmatee, Which Comprise the Fee Estimating Methodology Are Too Imprecise to Credibly Comport with the Requlremer~ts of the Law. For the reasons set forth above, it is e~ lent from, the Cit~ Council's .R. eport that the Fee Estimating Methodology~ when subjected tolcloser scrutiny, simply does not conform to the legal standards required by law. California courts, taking the!r lead from t United.State~ Suprem~ Court decisions in Nollan v, Cahforn a Coa~l al Comm~ssiont 483 U,S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard 5i2 !, 374 (1994), I~ave given close scrutiny to the methodologies used by governmental agencies to determine.the ,reasonableness of th.e. fees charged, in c~rder to "....serve the leglsiahve purpose of protecting developers f¢om disproportionate and excessive fees,.." Ehrlich v. C tv of Culver, 12 C~al,4~h 854 (1996), at 867. In fact, the Ehrlich court has s:ated that: "... Wher~ such exactions are imposed...on an ~nd~wdual and discretior ary basis, we conclude that the heightened standard judicial s( rutiny of Nollan and Dolan is triggered... blancherd · h ,milton page 5 ~/2002 One of th s central promises of the takings clause is that truly pul burdens, viii be publicly borne. Where the regulatory land use pc var of local gev, ~rnment is deployed against individual property owners through tle use of conditional permit exactions, the Nollan test 3s to secure th at promise by assuring that the monopoly power over developn =ant permits is not illegitimately exploited by imposing condition ~ that lack any logical affinity to the public impact of th~ particular land use. The essential nexus test is, in short, a "meal s- ends" eq~ lation, intended to limit the government's bargaining m( ,bility in imposi~ Ig permit conditions on individual property owners - wh ~ther they con ist of possessory dedications or the exaction of cash payment - that, because they appear to lack any evident conne ~.tion to the pu ~lic impact of the proposed land use, mayconceal an illegitima ie demand - may, in other words, amount to 'out and eL t extortior i' (Nollan, supra, 483 U,S. at p. 837) $.Ct. at p. 3149)...' Ehrlich, it 876. 10.The Level e I' Scrutiny to Be Applied. In sum, the law requires the City Council's Fee Estimating Methodology to "...mak,e. s .o. me sort of individualize :1 determina!ion that the required dedication is related b ~th in nature and Extent to the ,mpact of the proposed development..." at 880. The law requires the that "...the local government demonsh de a factually sue lainable proportionality between the effects of a propoe d land use an(la given exaction as one which furthers the assurance., implicit in thl* Nollan test that the condition at issue is more than theoretically or even plausibly related to legitimate regulatory ends.. Id, _Conclusion Because the Report fails to justify that the Adjustment Fees are Iogi~ ~lly and proportionatel related to the nature and extent of the impact of the pr( 3osed development, Mr. rihisztal objects to the proposed Fee Adjustments and respectfully reque= s that the City Council disapprove the assessment of ti" fees in their present fern ~ and magnitude. Res~ec..~ ly, Lonnie C. Blanch~ III blnnohnrd · h milton page 6 12002 Mrs. Catherine V. Bridge 650 W. Harrison Avenue Claremont, CA 91711 June 3, 2002 Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Increase in drainage fee. Dear Mayor Alexander and Members of the City Council, I am concerned about the sudden three hundred percent increase in the fees levied by the City to cover costs of drainage for new construction in Rancho Cucamonga. The fee increase is too extreme and too sudden. They will have a chilling effect on development, will encourage higher density development, or artificially inflate home prices. The steady development ora spectrum of housing over the past few years has mitigated the impact of recession on Rancho Cucamonga. Any of these effects of the drainage fee increase may have a negative financial impact on the City. I encourage the City to pursue alternative means to cover the costs of drainage, gauge the drainage fee increase, and institute an assessment and appeal procedure as part of the review process for approval of development plans. Sincerely, Catherine V. Bridge ' OPTI-ON RESOLUTION NO. 10 2 - (~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLANNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A. Recitals. 1. Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code contains those provisions pertaining to the establishment of the drainage plan for the City and the designation of seven local drainage areas. 2. Pursuant to Section 13.08.030, as a condition of development approval the City shall require the payment of a fee for the purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from the local drainage areas. 3. Pursuant to the terms of Section 13.08.040, the fees required to be paid by said Chapter 13.08 shall be set by a resolution of the City Council. 4. It is the desire of this Council to implement the fees related to those local drainage areas not otherwise exempted under the terms of Chapter 13.08. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. ii. For the purpose of establishing fees for the purpose of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from those local drainage areas as established in Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby adopts the fee schedule as follows: 1. Victoria Planned Community .......................... $0 2. Terra Vista Planned Community Area .............$0 3. The Caryn Planned Community Area .............. $0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. General City Drainage Fee June 5, 2002 Page 2 4. EtiwandaAreaA See Chapter 13.09 ofthe Municipal Code 5. Efiwanda Area B See Chapter 13.09 of the Municipal Code 6. Assessment District Areas ............................... $0 7. The General City Area a. Prior to 09/01/02 ........................... $5,000 b. 09/01/02 to 12/31/02 ..................... $8,500 c. On or after 01/01/03 .................... $15,300 Commencing 01/01/04, the General City Area fee amount will be reviewed annually with the estimated construction costs increased by the applicable Engineering News Record Index (November 2001 = 7228). Building permits issued within the Barton Development Agreement Area of the General City Area will have a fee of $0. OPTION 2 RESOLUTION NO. ~ 2- ~ (_o / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLANNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A. Recitals. 1. Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code contains those provisions pertaining to the establishment of the drainage plan for the City , and the designation of seven local drainage areas. 2. Pursuant to Section 13.08.030, as a condition of development approval the City shall require the payment of a fee for the purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from the local drainage areas. 3. Pursuant to the terms of Section 13.08.040, the fees required to be paid by said Chapter 13.08 shall be set by a resolution of the City Council. 4. It is the desire of this Council to implement the fees related to those local drainage areas not otherwise exempted under the terms of Chapter 13.08. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. ii. For the purpose of establishing fees for the purpose of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from those local drainage areas as established in Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby adopts the fee schedule as follows: 1. Victoria Planned Community .......................... $0 2. Terra Vista Planned Community Area .............$0 3. The Caryn Planned Community Area .............. $0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE FEES June 5, 2002 Page 2 4. Etiwanda Area A See Chapter 13.09 of the Municipal Code 5. Etiwanda Area B See Chapter 13.09 of the Municipal Code 6. Assessment District Areas ............................... $0 7. The General City Area a. Prior to 09/01/02 ........................... $5,000 b. On or after 09/01/02 .................... $15,300 Commencing 01/01/04, the General City Area fee amount will be reviewed annually with the estimated construction costs increased by the applicable Engineering News Record Index (November 2001 = 7228). Building permits issued within the Barton Development Agreement Area of the General City Area will have a fee of $0. RESOLUTION NO. 02" O ~-O 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED GENERAL CITY AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that the public health and safety require that adequate flood control and drainage facilities accompany additional land development; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the General City Area Master Plan of Drainage Report; and WHEREAS, minor alferations of a technical nature have occurred since that adoption which have warranted a need for the City Council to adopt an updated version of that plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council adopts the updated General City Area Master Plan of Drainage Report. SECTION 2: That the City Engineer may make minor modifications of a technical nature to said Plan and Policy upon more detailed reviews of the physical characteristics and hydrology/hydraulic analyses within the General City Area. TH E C T Y OF I~flN C II 0 CUCA~IONGA Staff Report DATF_~ June 5, 2002 T~. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FFE)t~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan land use designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street as Phase One of the General Plan Consistency Program - APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres on Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The amendment represents Phase One of the General Plan Consistency Program whereby various conflicts between General Plan Land Use designations and Development Districts/Specific Plan designations will be resolved to ensure consistency with the General Plan as recently updated in October of 2001. In this case, the 7-acre site on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street has historically been designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) by the General Plan but Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This discrepancy was discovered during processing of the Etiwanda Apartment project surrounding the 7-acre site to the north, west, and south. The Low-Medium Residential designation sits as an island surrounded by the higher density Medium Residential designation. The Planning CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESPA DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 5,2002 Page2 Commission is of the opinion that the amendment would not only provide consistency with the General Plan, but it would also ensure greater land use cohesion and compatibility by eliminating the need for specialized buffering between areas of differing densities. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Staff completed Part I of the Initial Study and Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Considering this is a land use amendment only, without an associated physical development project, and because of the relatively small size of the site (only 7 acres), and the nominal increase in the potential number of residences, no potential environmental impacts were found. If the City Council concurs then issuance of a Negative Declaration by City Council would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all preperty owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 24, 2002 Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Minutes dated April 24, 2002 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution 02-42 Draft Ordinance of Approval THE CITY OF I~^N C I1 0 CUC^PlONG^ DATE: April 24, 2002 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission F-ROt,/t Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the land use district designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Chumh Street as Phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program - APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Requested Action: Amend the Land Use Map of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for a 7-acre site on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue roughly midway between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to be consistent with the General Plan. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan South Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan East Multi-family housing under construction; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan West Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) / / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ESPA DRC2002-00231 -.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 2002 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is occupied by eight single-family homes built well before the City's incorporation. There are several Eucalyptus trees on-site that appear to be remnant windrows. The site is relatively flat, sloping gently from the northwest to the southeast. ANALYSIS: A. General: The amendment represents Phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program whereby various conflicts between General Plan Land Use designations and Development Districts/Specific Plan designations will be resolved to ensure consistency with the General Plan as recently updated in October of 2001, In this case, the 7-acre site on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street has historically been designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) by the General Plan but Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This discrepancy was discovered during processing of the Etiwanda Apartment project surrounding the 7-acre site to the north, west, and south, The Low-Medium Residential designation sits as an island surrounded by the higher density Medium Residential designation, The amendment would not only provide consistency with the General Plan, it also ensures greater land use cohesion and compatibility by eliminating the need for specialized buffering between areas of differing densities. B. Environmental Assessment: Staff completed Part I of the Initial Study and Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Considering this is a land use amendment only, without an associated physical development project, and because' of the relatively small size of the site (only 7 acres), and the nominal increase in the potential number of residences, no potential environmental impacts were found. If the Planning Commission concurs then a recommendation for certification of a Negative Declaration by City Council would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulleti0 newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION_: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2002-00231 be approved with issuance of a Negative Declaration through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Land Use Map Exhibit "B" Initial Study Draft Resolution Recommending Approval LM>M %,~ RRC 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Miles , , ~ ~EXHIBIT "A" - LAND USE MAP ~'~~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) C~y of Ratio Cucammga (9(~) 47/-[q'~0 Please note tbet lt is t~e mRx~sibll~ of t~e ap~ to ensure that INCOMPLETE APPUCA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. be available to pertonn wo~ required to ptovfde the application is complete at the time ~i' submit~l; City ~aff will not . Application Number for ~ project to'whlcl) thla fomt · , Name & Address of project Name & Address ofperson pmpa#ng this form ('~ different from above): Telephone NumbeF. Information indicated by asteri~ 0 is not required of ~con.~-u~on CUPs unless ~ mquea'ed by staff.. _ '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet,s) which includes ~he project a~e, end Ind~ale the 2) Pmvfde a ,set of color photogmphs which show mpmsentaM wews ~n~ the site from the north, .. views into and fmrn the site from ~he pdrnary ecse~ points w~.lc~, serve ~ site; and mpresentaM views ~ ~ featu~--from the ~te. Include a map ~howing location of eacti pnmograpn. ' * . · 3) pmjent Lose~n (desC~fbe]:.'* ' .... 4) Aseessor.~ Parcel Nu~nbera (at~Va eddtifonel ahe~t if ~ ~ * , ,i , ~ · .. nece~muy): '6) Net Site Ama (totel slte slze mlnus area of publlc ~treet~ & PtoPOSed dedlceE~ne). ~ ~4'~. ~ 7) Desc~fbe any pm~ general plan amendment ~r z°ne change which would affect the project ~ (a~ta~a ~ddi~onel sheet ifnecessery: ...................... . 8) Include a descripfon of all permits which v~71 be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in o~ler to fully implemen~ ~he project: 9) Describe the physical seffing or,he site as it exists before the project including infon~ation on topography, soil stabllity, ~ and animals, mature bees, bail~ and roads, drainage cou~e~ and scenic aspec~ Desctfbe any exi.~ng sbuctures on stye (including age and condi#on) and the use of 8~e sin~ures. Aitach photographs of signillcant leah,ms de~ctfbed. In addison, site all so~ces of informal~n (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studl~ biotic and archeological surveys, traf~c studies): ¢O,~t-~ .~J~~ ~-~ '~r~.~' d,a~~'~'. " I:~,LANNING~INALIFORMb-'~C, OUNTER~I NITS'rD1 .WPD ~ =~ = 11) Desc#be any noise sources and their levels that now. effect the proposed useS: r Thls should pmvfde an edequate desctfp~on of lfle site in tenns °f uftfmate u~e ~ " 12) Desctfbe the proposed project in deteil.lndicate if U~ere are proposed phases for developmen~ the extent of development will result from the p~Oposed project. . occur w/th each phase, and the an#ctpated completion of each increment. Attach add/flonal sheet(s) if nece-~-~e-rY:. t3)DescSbe Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, err. i, tn~,,~,,~*~, sho~ deparbnent stores, et~ ) and scale of development (heigh~ frontage, seiba~ rear yard, , ~~ect a~ nge the Paffem, scale or character of the surrounding general'area of Ute plojec~ ' ~ .. affect adjacent properges and on-site use$. What methods of sound proofing am pmposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals end/or mp/acements of mature or scen/c beea: , 17) Indicate any bodies of water (induing dome~c water supprtes) into which the site drain&' a. R~ (g~Y) 20) Numar Attached (indicate whether units am rental or for sale units): Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per mordh) $ to 22) Specify number of bedrcen~ by unit type: .~.~ 23) Indicate anticipated household afze by unit · '* 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who Mil be residing within the pmjecC Contact {he appropriaM School b. JuniorHl~n:_ c Senior~ COMMERCIAL; INO~T~IA£ AND INSTtTU7'IONAL~PROJECT~. 2~) ~u~esS~.. be type of u~end majorfunctlon(s) o~ commemtal, Industrial or institutional · . X'x .. ' ' e hour; of opere~n: Number of Totsl: emplo~.~ Maximum Shi~ T~ne of Maximum Shifc ~lassifica~ions, including wage end salarX ranges, as well as an of him for each c addi~elal sheet ff necessa~): 30) Es~fmalten of tl~ e hired ~ currently reside in 1he' · 31]For comme~tsl ~ ~ at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32)Have ~he water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ab;7/fy to/xot,fde edequate sen,ioe te the proposed pmject? ' ff so, Ptease indicste ff~elr msP°nse' ~1~ Iht tm known history of this properly, has Ihem been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic m..a.~n'als?~ 33)Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals ~nclude, but are not limited to PCB.,~; radioactive substances; pesucmes a herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Pleaze list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the properly, as well as the dates of use, if 34) Will the'proposed project involve the temporao, or Iong~tetm use, storage or discharge of hazardous ancYor toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory Of all such maten'ala ~0 be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment amaa, ;shall be . shown and labeled on the application plar~ I hereby cerUfy Umt the statement~ furnished above andin Ihe attached exhtT~ts present Ifle data and infonnation required for adequate evaluaUon of this project to the best o~ my ablSb/, U~at the fac~ statements, and informauon presented am hue and correct tot he best · of my Imowledge and belief. I further unde~tand that additional info. ne#on may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluaifon can be made by I~e City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: ~ Signature: ~ Title: ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Etiwanda Specific Plan DRC2002-00231 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No. 16257, Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 (Etiwanda Apartments Project - Forecast Corporation). 3. Description of Project: A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan land use designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Chumh Street as phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program - APNs: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation:. Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 6. Existing Zoning: Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site contains 8 single-family detached homes and is surrounded by vacant land planned for the recently approved 368-unit "Etiwanda Apartments" project by Forecast Corporation. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Count Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: State Water Resoumes Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. i( ) Pop.u .' .... ' ( ) Energy end Mineral Res ( ) Aesthetics n ( )Lendl rces I~( ) Geological i-'roD~ems ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources I~ I1( ) Water ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation U ( ) Air Quality Mandato Findin s of Si nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: ~'~.~--~ ~ Brent Le Count, AICP Associate Planner April 2, 2002 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. U~less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (v) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (") vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") established community? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 3 Comments: a-d) The proposed amendment is necessary to make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medium Residential. All of the surrounding property is designated Medium Residential and the site therefore appears as an island of Low-Medium Residential. Issues and Supportinglnformation Sources: . I Iml~t I I~'~~ I 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () ('/) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (~') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () ('~) housing? Comments: a-c) Redesignating the site to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) will allow for potentially more occupants of a future project but the increase is nominal (42 more individuals if developed at the absolute top of the density range). Furthermore the General Plan already designates the site as Medium Residential. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ( ) ('~) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ( ) ('/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ( ) ('/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 4 Comments: a-b) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.8 miles north. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (Mw) 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 9.0 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhedng to the City grading standards and the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. c) In the absence of shallow groundwater, the site is not considered susceptible to soil liquefaction. d) The site is not located near a body of water; therefore, the proposed development will not expose people to a seiche hazard. e) The site is relatively flat; therefore, there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. Future grading to accommodate a project will be minimal to even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f-h) Soil type at the site and in the vicinity is Tujunga association (TvB). The Tujunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium. A soils report will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Standard grading practice includes watering of exposed/graded surfaces to control dust. The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) ( or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ('/) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) water body? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~, ~=~ e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ( ) ( ) ('~) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ( ) ( ) (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?. ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) A Preliminary Drainage Study was prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates for the Etiwanda Apartments project surrounding the site to the north, south, and west. The site drains southerly to Foothill Boulevard, through the Foothill Market Place, and ultimately to the Day Creek Channel. The City's Master Plan of Drainage proposed is to redirect this area easterly to the EtiwandeJSan Sevaine Channel. Interim conditions do not allow additional flows to the facility until downstream regional facilities are completed. In addition, the property is not physically capable of draining to the basin. A Final Drainage Report prepared for Tract 15711 (located north of the project site) in September 1997, provides for the redirection of the undeveloped runoff from this area, with mitigation detention occurring in Basin No. 6 to account for this increased undeveloped flow. The report suggests on-site detention of the incremental developed runoff from this area to occur as a potential option. A final Drainage Study will be required with routine processing of future development project on the site. b) Based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM, 1984) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is located within a "Flood Hazard Zone C." This zone is defined by FEMA as an area of minimal flooding. c-e) Whether or not the proposed land use amendment is approved, future grading on-site to accommodate a project could exceed 5 acres, as the total site area is 7 acres. This will require the applicant of such a future project to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the 'State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A future project would also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or storm water conveyance channels. BMPs would include, but are not limited to, street sweeping of paved roads during construction and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 6 during the rainy season. A final Grading Plan will be prepared for any future projects on the site in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of Grading Plans and conditions applied to the project by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP, will make this impact less than significant. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area, as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ u~ 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standards or contribute to ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (z) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (") Comments: a-d) The proposed land use amendment does not include an associated construction project. Development of the site in conformance with either the Low-Medium or Medium Residential districts will require analysis to ensure compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. Since there is no physical project associated with this request, no such analysis can yet be made. Furthermore, the site is relatively small, only 7 acres, and projects that can be accommodated on such a small site do not usually result in significant air quality restrictions, alter air movement, or affect temperature. There are no known sensitive receptors in the vicinity, and development of the site with residential uses is unlikely to generat.e pollutants or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '~ ~.co,~ I ~.= I ~.~=t i 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION- Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ) ( (~') b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ) ( (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () (~') nearby uses? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a) Roadways that will be utilized by a future development on the site include Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The eight single-family residences on site generate minimal traffic. Existing intersections in the vicinity of the site currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D capacity or better. The site is so small that a future development project would have traffic generation levels below the San Bernardino County Association of Governments threshold of 250 peak hour trips and therefore not require a Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA). The applicant for a future development project will be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the project's frontage along Etiwanda Boulevard. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. b-f) There is no physical project proposed so it is impossible to analyze traffic circulation design, etc. The site has approximately 500 feet of frontage on Etiwanda Avenue, which provides sufficient opportunity for adequate street access. g) Located approximately 7 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") ' habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) ( ) ("') Eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () ('~) Eucalyptus grove, Sage Scrub habitat, etc.)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 8 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ~,a~, d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and () () () (~') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is NOT within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The site contains 8 residential units. The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses and eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. b-c) The site contains several mature Eucalyptus trees that would need to be removed to accommodate future development of the site. However, this would be necessary whether the site remains in the current Low-Medium Residential distdct or is changed to the Medium Residential. In any case. no development project is associated with this amendment, and therefore there is no impact. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The 1-15 Freeway borders the site along the west and northwest. The site falls within an area of town that is rapidly being developed with new apartments and single-family homes. This development has eliminated any wildlife corridom that may have occurred in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ,,~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation. () () () ('") plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (") mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) Any future project on the site will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 9 c) The site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 Zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. · Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u~o=o. · .o 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (~') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an Emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) Response Plan or Emergency Evacuation Plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~') health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (~') potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () ('~) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes were observed during a site visit. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Past and current uses at and near the site include vineyard and residential development. Demolition of residential structures to accommodate a future project will be done in accordance with applicable City regulations. There is no actual development proposal associated with this amendment; however, changing the district from Low-Medium Residential to Medium Residential will not increase potential health hazards, fire hazards, or cause exposure of people to health hazards. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u.,.~ inco~ed ~ n~ I 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ) ( ) ( ) (") b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a-b) There is no development project associated with this amendment that would increase existing noise levels or expose people to severe noise levels. Development of a future project on site would generate construction noise and Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 10 expose people to traffic noise from Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway, but this would be the case regardless of whether the site were developed under the Low- Medium or Medium Residential districts. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: · 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard. and approximately 2 miles northwest of the site. The Foothill Fire District is responsible for evaluating any future projects on the site through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. Police Protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department. Residential development is routinely required to include standard security devices, such as street lighting and locks on all windows and doors. Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the area. A standard Condition of Approval on future development projects will require the payment of school impact fees. Parks. - The slight increase in potential population associated with the proposed amendment (42 more people if developed at maximum density) will have nominal affect on parks and any impact will be mitigated by payment of park fees at the established rate. Public Facilities - The site is so small that future residential development would not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets. The proposed amendment makes the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medium Residential. Any future development would be required to construct all necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to offset the incremental increase in traffic. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002~00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ( ) ( ) b) Communication systems? ( ( ) ( ) (~') c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) (~') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ) . ( ) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ) ( ) ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-g) The land area of the site is so small that the increase in allowable density anticipated by the proposed amendment will have a negligible impact on utilities and services. Any future development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u~ 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effec~ ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( )* (~') Comments: a-c) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway. Future development projects will be required to undergo the City's Development Review process, which includes exhausting design review of building design, grading, and landscaping to ensure quality aesthetics. Any development project will increase light and glare as new lighting will be necessary, but the increase due to the proposed amendment would be nominal. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pot~ u~ M~gat~ S~ No 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Disturb paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Disturb amhaeological resoumes? ( ( ) ( ) (~') c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ( ) ( ) (v) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ( ) ( ) (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. The' site is located in a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the project site. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ~ .o 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") Comments: a-b) The subject amendment would result in a maximum of 42 more dwelling units than could currently be developed. The City's park fees are based upon which residential district a site falls within, so any future development would be subject to appropriate fees for the Medium Residential District. Surrounding and adjacent land are also designated residential or commercial and are either currently developed, being developed, or proposed for development. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: u.~., 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE, a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have () () () (~') the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one, which occurs, in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts () () () ('~) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ()) () (~') environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a-d) The amendment does not have a physical project associated with it, so assessment of all potential impacts cannot be undertaken until a project is proposed. The amendment is necessary to make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medium Residential. The site is relatively small, only 7 acres, so the increase in households that would result in re-districting the site from Low-Medium to Medium residential would be nominal. For the most part, impacts associated with development of the site under Medium Residential requirements are indistinguishable from that associated with development of the site under Low-Medium Residential requirements. The amendment will foster compatibility of land uses, as the site is an island of Low- Medium Residential surrounded by Medium Residential. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 - Forecast Corporation Page 14 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analyses. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): · Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (Certified 1983) · Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) · Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (Adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) · United States Fish and Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997. · Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR (Adopted October 2001, State Clearinghouse No. 2000061027) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting April 24, 2002 Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:11 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Para Stewart ABSENT: Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner;, Dan Coleman, Principal Planne~, Kirt Coury, Associate Planner;, Craig Fox, Deputy City Attomey; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Brent Le Count, Associate L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannerino, carried 3-0-2 (McNiel, Tolstoy absent), to approve the minutes of April 10, 2002. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the land use district designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street as Phase One of the General Plan COnsistency program - APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35. Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing. There were no comments, and he closed the hearing. Commissioner Mannerino felt it is an appropriate amendment in light of the update to the General Plan. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Stewart, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution recommending approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2002-00231. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY - carried B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH - The phased development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related File: Variance DRC2001-00~.~. C. VARIANCE DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH - A request to allow a 10-foot high parking lot retaining wall and a 15-foot high parking lot retaining wall, where a maximum 6-foot high wall is permitted, and increase building height to 45-feet, where 35-feet is the permitted maximum building height, for a proposed church in the Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921- 36. Related File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439. Kirt Coury presented the staff report and indicated that staff was recommending a condition be added to the resolution to require completion of the north side curb and gutter of Calle del Prado with the development of the gymnasium or the education building. He noted that two letters had been sent by nearby residents raising questions and concerns regarding landscaping, drainage, color and height of the building, and the wall on the eastern side. Mr. Coury explained that the trees in question will be a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees to provide some year-round screening. He said the color of the facility is a beige, which should blend in with the neighborhood as 8 of the 10 homes along Vineyard are beige. Regarding the height, he explained that the sanctuary is set back from Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado and is designed to be terraced into the hill. He observed that one of the residents to the east was now asking for a block wall instead of a wrought iron wall that was requested at the neighborhood meeting. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, explainedlhat the storm drain facility in Vineyard Avenue was designed and developed in the mid 1980s and was designed to accommodate development of this site. Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing. Dr. Chris Esteves, Lifeway Church, 213 East Tenth Street, Pomona, stated is the Senior Pastor for the chumh. He said they spent many years looking for a church in Rancho Cucamonga because many of their congregants live here. He explained they had community meetings with the surrounding residents prior to purchasing the site. He noted the residents raised concerns about the placement of the buildings and the church worked with the residents. He felt they have established good relations with the neighbors and come up with a good plan that accommodates the needs of the church and lessens impacts on the residents. He believed the church will benefit the community. He reported that they proposed a block wall, but at a neighborhood meeting, the son-in-law of a resident to the east asked for a wrought iron fence. He indicated they are not opposed to constructing a block wall there. Roger Sharp, 6513 Peridot, Rancho Cucemonga, stated he was speaking on behalf of Ruth Haas, the property owner to the east. He said she preferred a 6-foot block wall for privacy reasons. He indicated they support development of the church as they feel it will help with the coyote problems. Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 24, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. 02-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. DRC2002-00231 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 2002 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby speclficelly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on Apdl 24, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City;, and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment is necessary to resolve conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-42 ESPA DRC2002-00231- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 2002 ....... Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. DRC2002-00231 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rich Macias, Vice Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-42 ESPA DRC2002-00231- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 2002 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, SecretaP/of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of April 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MAClAS, MANNERINO, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35. A. Recitals. 1. In October of 2001, the City Council adopted the 2001 General Plan Update, and recognizing that there are various areas within the City that have development districts that differ from the land use districts of the General Plan, a General Plan Consistency Program was established. 2. On April 24, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval. 3. On June 5, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 5, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; c. The surrounding land area is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); d. This amendment is necessary to establish consistency with the Land Use Policies and Designations of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ESPA DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 5, 2002 Page 2 f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council-during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. The 7-acre site is surrounded by Medium Residential Land Use designation and the surrounding property has been approved for an apartment project in the same district; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates the site as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) so the amendment will make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2002-00231, a request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 7 acres of land located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as shown in the Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. SITE LM>M RRC L AND US MAP o 0.1 0.2 0.3 Miles , ~ N R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~NCINgEI~ING D~PAI~TMENT Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, A1CP FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst I SUBJECr: APPROVE PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,000 FROM FUND 1110316-5650, FOR THE ANNUAL CHURCH OF THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS VOLUNTEER PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON LEMON AVENUE, BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND BERYL STREET AND AUTHORIZE D & K CONCRETE AND SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS AS SOLE SOURCE PROVIDERS OF CONCRETE AND WASHED STONE RESPECTIVELY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of supplies and materials and appropriate funds in the amount of $44,000 from Account No. 1110316-5650 for the annual Church of the Latter-Day Saints volunteer parkway improvement project on Lemon Avenue, between Carnelian Street and Beryl Street and authorize D & K Concrete and San Antonio Materials as sole source providers of concrete and washed stone respectively. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS For the past 3 years, city staff has partnered with the local LDS Church to complete various parkway/landscape projects throughout the city. These projects have been very successful and have beautified several areas in need of improvement, such as the landscape area on the west side of Haven, between Base Line and Church. The volunteers provide the labor for the completion of these projects as a community service project, which is timed to coincide with their annual Pioneer Days celebration. This year, the project will be completed on Saturday, July 27, 2002. Specifically, they will be installing the concrete and rock within the areas designed for cobble hardscape on Lemon Avenue betwean Carnelian and Beryl. The city provides staff support, traffic control and materials. The sole source designations for concrete and washed stone are for the only reliable suppliers of these two materials. Prior experience with the low bid concrete supplier for the Haven Avenue volunteer project proved near disastrous when the supplier failed to fulfill its commitment to supply concrete in a timely manner causing significant delay to the project and angering five hundred volunteers. The washed stone supplier, San Antonio Materials of Upland, is the. only local supplier of large quantities of quality stone capable of delivering the material to the work site. Respe~uJ.!y submitted, ~" William"J</O Nell City Engineer WJO:JU T H E C I T Y O F I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 5, 2002 TO: Meyor end Members of the City Council Jeck Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SEVEN YEAR EXTENSION OF THE MOBILE HOME ACCORD WITH SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a seven-year extension of the mobile home accord with the Sycamore Villa mobile home park. The terms of the accord will be identical and the appendices listing amenities offered in each park will be updated to reflect current conditions in the parks. In addition, per the agreement between the residents and the owners, an additional $4.00 per month may be added on top of the base rent allowed under the accord. BACKGROUND The mobile home accord was put into place over ten years ago as a way to provide stability to mobile home park rents. The accord was last renewed five years ago. Staff has met with representatives of the park owners and residents in negotiating this extension. With the exception of Sycamore Villa, all of the mobile home park owners and resident agreed to the extension. We are now ready to recommend the extension of the accord for this park. The outstanding issues for this park had to do with the amount the owners were allowed to raise the rent. After holding a series of meetings with the residents in the park, the owners were able to reach agreement with the residents on the issue of rent. This agreement allows for the owners to raise the rent an additional $4.00 per month each year for the term of the accord. In exchange for this, the owner has agreed to certain improvements in the park as well as regular meetings with the residents to discuss items of concern. Some of the items the owner has agreed to are the installation of a play area, barbecues and annual tree trimming. In addition the owner has agreed to meet with the residents every two months. Page 2 June 5, 2002 CONSIDERATION OF SEVEN YEAR EXTENSION OF THE MOBILE HOME ACCORD WITH SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK The owners and residents of this park should be commended for coming together to address their mutual concerns. The agreement is in keeping with the direction of the Mobile Home Subcommittee and approval by the full City Council is recommended. ~..~ectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager