Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/11/08 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 2000 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel Vice Chairman Macias __ Com. Mannerino__ Com. Stewart__ Com. Tolstoy__ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS II1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Adjourned Meeting September 13, 2000 Adjourned Meeting October 11, 2000 October 25, 2000 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USF PERMIT 00-31- LEGENDS BURGER,~ - The development of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru on 1.25 acre of land in Office Professional District, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN: 207~031-29. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Wireless Ordinance, Chapter 17.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, to allow the development of major wireless communication facilities within 300 feet of a residential structure or residential district. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A review of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report and the consideration of approving the Statement of Findings and Overriding Consideration for the proposed project known as Victoria Arbors Village. D. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors village on approximately 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the ' north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31, 33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25; and 227-211 - 40. 1. Change the Land Use for approximately 232.8 acres of land from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre), Community Facilities, Regional Related Office/Commercial, Office Professional, and Park to Mixed Use. 2. Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. 3.Amend the land use, various graphics, and text for the Victoria Community Plan. 4. Change the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 27 acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan generally located at the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street; change the zoning from Office Professional to Mixed Use; and consider retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-04. Page 2 E. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the name of Victoria Lakes village to Victoria Arbors village within the Victoria Planned Community. Related file: General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. V. NEW BUSINESS F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-28 - GATX III/IV The development of two industrial warehouse/distribution buildings (Building Ill - 449,370 square feet Building IV - 468,410 square feet) totaling 917,780 square feet within the Catellus Master Plan on 44 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at the northeast and northwest corners of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related file: Pre-Application Review 00-04 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS G. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT,C; H. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 2, 2000, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 3 Vicinity Map ' Planning Commission November 8, 2000 Influence Banyan 19th/210 Fwy ~ C,D,E % Foothill Arrow ~ 4th City of Rancho Cucamon~a B = CI~IDE Victoria Planned Community ~ N WED O1:51 ?~1 ?. 002/008 Mk~haei Gl. RademaKer President November 8~ 2000 The City o~ R~r~ C:ucemonga ~ ~g ~ p~ ~ m ~t ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~t to a ~cfl ~g ~t. We wo~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rec~ ~t ~ ~ ~t we ~ ~t a~i~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, I w~ ~ to ~w my ~ome ~mew~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~e of a ~ve ~ ~t ~y ~.~ not ~y ~ ~ but ~a ~d~g a~Tn~ ~ S:~ ~ ~ e~g p~l~ ~ way ~ w~ K ~ c~d ~ ~ey ~d ~e~. Commerda~ Brokerage · Residential Real Estate · Property Management · J42~ W. Footflnl BJvd,, l~ulte 200. Upland, ~difornia Office: 901N~1-44~6 w-,~,,w, rng tsar'ices .corn NO¥-gs-200i W~D 01/51 PM ..................... P. 00~/008 I anti.stand tl~ C-~s per. eprOm that ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e~ed ~ wo~ Be core,mm ~ ~ m~ ~, but not to ~ u~ ~ ~ ~omo~. ~t ~ ~ ~ o~ o~ ~ ~ ~o~g ~ ~ ~ a~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ot ~d~ed ~ ~ J~ 5~ ~8 ~sJn ~ ~ blo~ out ~ ~y not ~ ~ ~ ~j~ Page $ Also L~ proposed ou~de eat~ ~ea aga.~ cme~tef ~t ~y ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~p~ ~d~ ~om ~ ~ ~oI ~ p~k ~ ~t ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ se~t~ d~U~. ~e& ~a~ ~ ~t ~te~ ~ peop~ ~ ~ve ~ge ~e~o~ automob~ ~ ~ot ~ ~ ~e ~ly c~ about ~ po~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~t ~ a p~p~ f~ ~ ~ed upon ~ ~0~ ~ We ~ ~y ~s~g ~ be ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g~ ~ ~ B, ~ough ~ ~ ~w c~ ~ ~b~d s~e ~ed p~, we ~ w~d ~ ~ ~g ~mm~ not to ~ a ~ ~e p~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ o~bot ~ v~ ~ ~ pot~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ z~ o~ ~ ~ ~ o~ by ~ ~ to note, that the xeCilXOC~ paxki~ does not ~ezt~ them ~ ~g of ~ ~g ~ md~ ~ o~ but ~bybo~. ~e ~ ~ yet ~ ~ ~y w~ ou~ ~ ~p~ p~ ~ ~ pub~ ~ ~mple~ ~po~ ~P~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~n~u~ m ~ may ~u~ eqm~t ~ u~s ~ou~ ~y sm~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~g m ~ate ~ge ~ to ~ ~ge ~d cmph~y ~ye out ~ ~o. 5.5, ~ ~ s~o~g ~ s~, E~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ b~ ~d ~ ov~ ~y ~ ~ ~ o~a ~d ~ fo~ ~ ~d m ~ o~o~ way so ~ ~ ~ up~ but ~ m~y ~ ~ com~Iy ~ 5~, I b~ ~ ~y s~ ~t ~y work ~ ~ s~t ~ ~ b~ a~ov~ U~ s~ 5.6, ~ s~ pang ~ ~ d~d ~a~ ~ s~e~ to x~g ~ ~o~ ~ by ~ a~ p~ ~. U~ 5.~ ~o~g ~ ~ ~ ~ e~n~ m ~ b~ w~ at ~ ~t ~s ~ m'~ ~ b~ of ~ ~d md~ co~ ~ o~ ~b~8 a ~ ~-~ c~, ~ a b~ ~ ~ ~od ~. to ?o~y ~ a ~ ~ o~ c~ ~ ~o~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~0¥-(~8-2000 WH) 0i:52 ?~1 ?. 006/008 Michael G. Ra~ ~k~ MC~/pb cc N~rr~ ~rowell THE C I T Y OF I~AN CH 0 ClJCAH ONC, A StaffRe rt DATE: November 8, 2000 TO: Chairman and Membem of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-31 LEGENDS BURGERS - The development of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru on 1.25 acre of land in Office Professional District, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN: 207-031-29. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Existing retail shopping center; Neighborhood Commercial South - Existing office development; Office Professional District East Villa Del Rey senior housing complex; Office Professional District West Existing McDonalds drive thru restaurant; Office Professional District B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Office Professional North Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Office Professional West - Neighborhood Commemial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is located within the existing The Exchange Business Center. The site is the last undeveloped parcel along Base Line Road of the approved Master Plan, under Development Review 79-24. The pad currently contains grass and is surrounded by parking stalls and landscape planters, which will not be removed with the proposed construction. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk exist along the street frontage. Vehicular access to the site exists along Carnelian Street and Base Line Road. The project site is approximately 10 feet below street level. The site slopes north to south at approximately 7 percent. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 00-31 - LEGENDS BURGERS November 8, 2000 Page 2 D. Parkinq Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided Legends Burgers 3,671 1/75 49 Outdoor seating area 824 1/75 11 42 Exchange Building 64,620 1/200 323 359 McDonalds 3,410 1/75 45 31 Total 428 432 * · All parking spaces within the center are available via a reciprocal parking agreement (Declaration of Mutual Grants of Easements recorded January 5, 1988). ANALYSIS A. General: The building design incorporates some of the basic amhitectural features that are established within The Exchange office/professional center, such as Spanish tile roof, tower elements, wood lattice treatment, and tile accents. The restaurant is designed to capture the 1950s dinner style and feel, particularly the interior design. The drive-thru lane will wrap around the north and west sides of the building. The outdoor eating area is proposed at the northeast corner of the building. Access to the site will be available from three existing driveway approaches, two on the Base Line Road frontage and one on Carnelian Street. The project represents a minor modification to The Exchange office/professional center's master plan, which include a restaurant at this location without a drive-thru. However, the project meets the basic intent of the Drive-thru Design Policy, in that it is located 200 feet from any residential district, has compatible architectural style with the surrounding uses within the center, and the drive-thru lane and parking respect the 45-foot setback from street frontage. B. Desi.qn Review Committee: The project was considered by the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) on October 3, 2000, at which time the Committee requested that the project be revised and brought back for further review. At the time, the building design featured an abstract assemblage of geometric forms, black and white "checkerboard" tile wainscot, and stainless steel cornice around the dining area. The project was substantially redesigned to incorporate some of the architectural features of the buildings within The Exchange office/professional center. The revised design was considered by the Design Review Committee (Stewart, Coleman) on October 17, 2000, and the Committee recommended approval with conditions (Exhibit "F"). C. Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to the Conditions of Approval outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, were prepared. Staff has determined that the project will not result in substantial impact to the environment. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 00-31 - LEGENDS BURGERS November 8, 2000 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 00-31 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:RZ:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit"D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations/Floor Plan Exhibit"F" - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated October 3 and October 17, 2000 Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Part,1 and 2 Resolution of Approval with Conditions Location Map CUP 00-31 Baseline Road ° ! ~ ~ Project Site ~ ~ Bu,ldi.g footprints -~ parcels [- N S F~TS (t'~) / DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Rudy Zeledon October 3, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-31- LEGENDS RESTAURANT -The development of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru, on 1.25-acre of land in Office Professional District, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN: 207-031-29. Desiqn Parameters: The project site is located within the existing The Exchange, which contains a Spanish style (tile roof, amhed colonnade) two-story multiple tenant office building and McDonalds restaurant with a drive-thru. The site is located on the last undeveloped parcel along Base Line Road of the approved Master Plan, under Development Review 79-24. The pad currently contains grass and is surrounded by parking stalls and landscape planters, which will not be removed with the proposed construction. Ourb, gutter, and sidewalk exist along the street frontage. Vehicular access to the site exists along Carnelian Street and Base Line Road. The project site is approximately 10 feet below street level. The site slopes north to south at approximately 7 percent. To the east is Villa Del Rey senior housing. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be on the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Architectural Style: The futuristic, angular shaped building design is a flashback to the drive- thru restaurants of the 1960s, when Americans were caught up in the 'space race' and fascinated with the future, and fast food restaurant chains emerged. The architectural design features an abstract assemblage of geometric forms; black and white 'checkerboard' tile wainscot, and stainless steel comice around dining area. Staff supports the use of "signature architecture;' however, the Planning Commission's Drive-thru Policies encourage drive-thru facilities within a Master Plan to have an architectural style consistent with the theme established within the center. If the Committee supports the proposed style, staff suggests that a second primary exterior wall material be added. The newest building to be built within the complex is the McDonalds restaurant, located on the northwest comer of the site. The McDonalds restaurant is stylistically different; however, includes some major design features of the main building of The Exchange, such as Spanish tile roof, stucco exterior, and wood lattice treatment. 2. Color: The proposed color scheme should be toned down to avoid the sharp contrast in colors. The white and blue colors were used on Cowboy Burgers but were not received well by the Planning Commission. For example, softer earth tone colors should be utilized and compatible with the color scheme used within the center. In addition, the checkerboard pattern wainscoting treatment should be changed to incorporate one color to compliment the building. The McDonalds color scheme is different from The Exchange's tan stucco and brown trim. 3. Site Plan: To minimize conflicts with vehicles exiting the drive-thru and vehicles trying to park in the parking island east (see Exhibit 'A'). Requires reconstruction of existing parking. See also Major Issue #5. DRC COMMENTS CUP 00-31 - LEGENDS RESTAURANT October 3, 2000 Page 2 4. Drive-Thru Screeninq: These alternatives would improve screening: Alternative #1 - Provide Iow decorative screen wall between drive-thru lane. Pro: Simplest and most cost effective solution. Con: Does not provide room for landscaping. Alternative ~2 - Widen the landscape to accommodate trees and shrubs (18 inches proposed). To accomplish this the existing parking bay to the east of this pad would have to be flipped as shown in Exhibit "B" to shift the building footprint easterly. Pro: Provides maximum landscape screening and shade opportunities. Con: Expensive reconstruction of parking. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Special paving should be introduced where pedestrians cross ddve aisles. 2. Provide a sidewalk connection from Base Line Road sidewalk to the entrance of the building. 3. Signs will be a challenge because the site sits so far below Base Line Road. The sweeping fin projecting 35 feet in the air on the north elevation appears to be intended for wall signs. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the project be revised in terms of the above comments and brought to the Design Review Committee for review. Attachments: Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, and Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Rudy Zeledon The Committee reviewed the project and did not recommend approval. The Committee did not oppose to the use of "signature amhitecture;" however, they opposed the proposed style of building. The Committee expressed their concerns with the proposed angular shape and color scheme of the building. The Committee recommended that abstract assemblage of geometric forms, black and white "checkerboard" tile wainscote, and stainless steel cornice around dining area, should be toned down. The Committee directed the applicant to continue to work with staff on resolving the major issues presented at the meeting. The applicant agreed to address secondary issues, which included special paving at pedestrian crossings, possible sidewalk connection from Base Line Road to the building and building signage. The applicant was directed to revise the project and return to Design Review Committee at a time and date to be set. 40/47 EXISTING OIrF1C[ BUILDCNO /~/~ , £XIb'T1NG ~~UILDI~ ,,¢_/¢ :, DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:30 p.m. Rudy Zeledon October 17, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-31- LEGENDS BURGERS -The development of a 3,871 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru, on 1.25-acre of land in Office Professional District, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN: 207-031-29. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Rudy Zeledon The project was considered by the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) on October 3, 2000, at which time the Committee requested that the project be revised and brought back for further review. At that time, the building design featured an abstract assemblage of geometric forms, black and white "checkerboard" tile wainscot, and stainless steel cornice around dining area. The project was walked on to the Design Committee Review by staff on October 17, 2000. The project was substantially redesigned to incorporate some of the architectural features of the buildings within the Exchange office/professional center. The Design Review Committee (Stewart, Coleman) recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to minimize conflicts with vehicles exiting the drive-thru and vehicles trying to park in the parking island east of the building. All proposals shall be subject City Planner review and approval. 2. Special paving shall be introduced where pedestrians cross drive aisles. 3. A combination of a Iow decorative wall and dense landscaping shall be incorporated around the west leg of the drive-thru, to provide additional drive-thru screening. 4. The applicant shall work with staff in providing a sidewalk connection from Base Line Road to the entrance of the building. All proposals shall be subject City Planner review and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) P/ann/ng (909) 477-2750 The purpose'Of this. form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project s° that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines;the Califomia Environmental Quality Act; and the City=s Rules and Procedures to .Implement CEQA~. It is important that the information requested in this application be INCOMPLETE APPLICA TIONS WlLL NOT BE PROCES.~Fn Please note that il is the msponsibili~y of the applicant to ensum that the application is complete at the Ume of submiJlal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project fo which this form perlains: Project Title: Legends Burgers Name & Address of project owner(s): Peter K. Vagenas and James Kefallinos 1645 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91730 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Address: Chartes Joseph Associates, Chuck Bucluet 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number: 909-481-1822 Name & Address of pereon preparing this form (if different from above): Same as above Information indicated by astedsk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff. ) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 1 ~) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color phofogcaphs which show representative views iqto the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site.- Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Southside of Baseline Road, East of Camelian Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 4) A~see, e,e~sAssessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if 0207-031-000 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): . 1.25 Acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): .gg Acres- 43,138 s.~ 7)Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet ff necessary: Conditional Use Permit Only $)lnclude a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Conditional Use Permit Only 9) Descdbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Descdbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features descdbed. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The proposed project will be constructed on an existing building pad located in the Exchange Office Center. lO)Describe the known cultural ancYor hisfo~cal aspects of the site. Site all sources of infoffnation (books, published reports and orel history): There are no cuitural or histodcal aspects known at this site. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Existing Roadway noise from Baseline Road that will have affect on proposed use. 12)Descdbe the proposed project in detait. This should provide an adequate descfip§on of the site in terms of ul#mate use which will result froro the prosed projecL Indicate if there are preposed phases for developroent, the extent of developroent to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each incroeroent. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessaG,: The proposed project will be a Legends Burgers restaurant comprised of 3,§71 s.[ Ist floor-dining and kitchen and 1,286 s.f. 2~ floor-storage building having a convenience drive-through lane. 13)Describe the surrounding properties, including infon~aUon on plants and aniroals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, coromercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-faroily, apa~troent houses, shops, deparknent stores, etc.) and scale of deveieproent (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Sun'ounding land uses to the project site are: Nortb-neighborhood commercial; West-neighborhood commercial; South- office professional; East-office professional/senior roulti-faroiiy. 14) Will the proposed project change the paitem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The project will provide an additional restaurant option for sunounding businesses and the rootoring public. 15)Indicate the b/pe of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amounL How will ~hese noise levels affect adjacent propertles and on.sile usas. What methoda of saund praofing ara praposad? Short-term noise will be generated from the site that will meet afl applicable noise mitigation and CNEL standards. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of matura or scenic trees: N/A 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: N/A 18)Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Atiachment A for usege aah'mates). For further cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Waler District at 987-2591. a. Residenh~l (gal/day) N/A Peak use (gal/Day) N/A b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 1500 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 3000 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank. x.._._ Sewec ff septic tanks ara proposed, a~tach percolation tests, ff discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Counb/ Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) N/A b. Commeraial,,lnd. (gaYday/ac) 1500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of rasidential units: Detached (indicale range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rantal orfor saie units): N/A 21)Anticipated range of sale pdces and/or rants: Sale Price(s) $__ N/A to $, Rent (per month) $.__ N/A to $ 22) Specify number of pedmoms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within ff~e project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: N/A b. Junior High: N/A c. Senior High N/A COMMERCIALI INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT.=; 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of oommercial, industrial or institutional uses: Sit down restaurant with convenience drive-through. 26) Total floor ama of commemial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 3,071 s.f. Ist floor dining and kitchen; 1,286 s.f. 2~ floor storage 27) Indicate hours of operation: Open 7 days a week 7 A.M, to 11P.M. 28) Number of empioyees: Total: 15 Maximum Shift: 7 Time of Maximum Shift: 8 Hours 2g)Pmvide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salaG' ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 2 Management $2,000.00 monthly 7 Cooks/Kitchen Staff $ 7.50 perhour 6 Waitress/Cashier $6.50 perhour 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 10 *31)For commereial and indusbfal uses only, indicate the source, ~ype and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be vedfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? ff so, please indicate theirresponse. Agencies contacted have indicted their abilily to provide adequate service to the proposed project. 33)1n the known history of this pm per~y, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic maiedals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB=s; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note unde~graund storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the plopefty, as well as the dates of use, if known. None 34) Will the proposed pmject involve the tempore~y or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and p~oposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits pmsent the data and informab'on required for adequate evaluation of this preject to the best of my ablllly, that the facts, sfatements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of ray knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be reade by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Auqu~t 15. 2000-- Signature: __~ Title: President City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 00-31 2. Related Files: 3. Description of Project: The development of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru, on 1.25-acre of land in Office Professional District, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street. APN: 207-031-29. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Legend Burgers 1645 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 5. General Plan Designation: Office. 6. Zoning: Office Professional. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located on the last undeveloped parcel along Base Line Road at The Exchange, an existing master planned office complex, under Development Review 79-24. The pad currently contains grass and is surrounded by parking stalls and landscape planters, which will not be removed with the proposed construction. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk exist along the street frontage. Vehicular access to the site exists via two driveways each along Carnelian Street and Base Line Road. The project site is approximately 8 feet below street level. The site slopes north to south at approximately 7 percent. To the east is Villa Del Rey senior housing. McDonalds and Carls Jr. fast food restaurants exist to the west and across the street, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rudy Zeledon (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (V') Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (v~) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resoumes (v~) Aesthetics (v~) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources (,'") A r Quality ('/') Noise ( ) Recreation ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (,/) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: ~~' ~ud,~don, Assistant Planner ctt)bedcl'6, 2000 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poteatiall¥ Unless man 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal'. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( (v') b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or (,,') policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the (v') vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an (v') established community? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 3 Comments: a-d) The project site is located within the Exchange Business Complex. The site is the last undeveloped parcel along Base Line Road of the approved Master Plan under Development Review 79-24. The area is designated Office Professional and is located on the southeast corner of Carnelian Street and Base Line Road. The proposed restaurant would be consistent with existing and permitted land uses within the Office Professional District. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~..~y u.,.~ ~ 2. POPULATION AND ~ Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ) (¢') population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ) (v') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Operation of the restaurant will include 15 full-time employees. The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing, as they will likely reside within the City or surrounding communities. c) Approximately 1.25 acres are proposed for development. The restaurant will be constructed on a parcel within the existing Exchange Business Complex, zoned Office Professional. There are no residential structures within the vicinity. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ,=.,.,,~y Unless incorporated ~mpact 3. GEOLOG~CPRO~ Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (./) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Tttan e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) (v') f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) (,/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) (v') h) Expansive soils? ( ) ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ) (,/') Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Rod Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 miles northwest of the site and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles northwest. These faults are capable of producing Mw 6.0 and 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Aisc, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw7.5 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 12.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Liquefaction could occur at the site if a strong earthquake coincided with an extended period of heavy rains raising the local water table. Soils type on-site and in the vicinity is Ramona-Arlington. These soils are relatively stable but subject to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal. Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f-h) Soils type on-site and in the vicinity is Ramona-Arlington, These soils are relatively stable, The project site is located within an established office center. The pad currently contains grass, which is maintained once a week. Runoff will be conveyed to existing facilities and the hazard of erosion is slight i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~.ti~,y u,,~ 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ( ) ( ) (v') of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ( ) ( ) (,,,) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ( ) ( ) (v') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The absorption rate will be altered because of the pawng and hardscape proposed. All runoff will be conveyed to existing drainage facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. No other improvements beyond the master plan of drainage are necessary to accommodate the project. The impact is not considered significant. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated (Zone X) on The Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed, prior to issuance of a grading permit. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area, as the site is not used for groundwater discharge. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) 0 (v') c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from grading the site. However, the site is too small (1.25 acres) to generate significant PM~o contamination that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds. Nonetheless, dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this site consistent with established grading practices. c-d) The proposed project is to construct a 3,671 square foot fast food drive-thru restaurant for public use on 1.25 acres of vacant land. Adequate parking and landscaping will be provided in accordance with the City's Development Code. Minimal emissions will be generated from the cooking of food. The restaurant will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: p~.,,,,~y u,~, 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,.") Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) alternative transportation (e.g.. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ( ) (v') Comments: a-b) The project site is located within The Exchange, a master planned Office Complex. The vacant pad was original approved for a restaurant use. Vehicle trips will increase slightly because of the intended use; however, the on-site circulation design and existing roadway improvements will accommodate the increase in traffic. Therefore the traffic impacts will be less than significant. c-f) Ingress and egress will be from Base Line Road and Carnelian Street. The proposed restaurant is flanked to the west and east by existing driveways from Base Line Road. The entry is set back from the main drive aisle intersection so that visitors to the site will not conflict with vehicles in the drive aisles. The proposed project includes on-site parking and a fast food drive-thru. g) Located approximately 4 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~y u,~,, 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ( ) (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ( ) (v') eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) (,,-) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 8 Comments: a) The site is located within The Exchange Office Complex. The pad currently consists of grass that is maintained once a week. No natural habitat exists on-site, and the property is not within the Ontario Recovery Unit, as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving FEy (DSF) habitat. b-c) The site contains grass and has no native vegetation on-site. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) Surrounding residential and commercial development in the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pot~.al~ u,~, ~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal'. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) There is no known resources that would be a future value to the region and the residents of the state, Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 9 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Thar~ b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a,c,d)The vacant site is located within The Exchange Office Complex. There is no evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. b) The project will not interfere with the flow of traffic on Base Line Road or Carnelian Street. Project plans will be reviewed and approved by City departments to determine adequate access for emergency vehicles. e) The project is not located in a high fire hazard area and is located within a shopping center. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~...~,y un,.~ ~. 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-b) The project would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. Noise will be consistent with existing levels, which includes traffic on Base Line Road and Carnelian Street and surrounding commercial use. There are no sensitive receptors in the area and impacts to noise were not considered significant. The Villa Del Rey senior housing is approximately 250 feet to the east. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 10 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Then 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Street, and is served by a fire station #171, which is located on the northeast corner of Amethyst Street and 19th Street, approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. The addition of a 3,671square foot restaurant is not considered significant. Police protection - Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the restaurant will not change current facility operating hours and will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled because the project site is relatively small, slightly larger than I acre. Schools - The proposed restaurant building will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools. .Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Operation of the restaurant will require 15 full-time employees that will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore, construction of a restaurant will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent will the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 11 S~gniflcant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po,.,,~a,y Unisys Than 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) b) Commun cation systems? ( ) (,/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) (v~) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) (,,,) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (./) f) So id waste disposal'~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) ' (,/) Comments: a-g) The project will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. The proposed project will not require major modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems. / Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scen c vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) Comments: a) The project site is located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Street, which are not considered scenic corridors by the City or the County of San Bemardino. b) The proposed project is part of The Exchange Office Complex and is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Standards. The proposed design and exterior elements of the restaurant will be consistent with design standards set forth in the Master Plan and City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Guideline Policies. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 12 c) The project will create new light and glare because the pad is currently vacant; however, there are numerous existing light standards throughout The Exchange parking lot which surrounds subject property. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. The impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless ~Le~an 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) As the site is relatively small and located within an established business center, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources; Pa~,~,y UnleSS T~an 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is not likely, as the proposed restaurant will require a total of 15 full-time employees. A majority of these employees will likely reside within the City or surrounding communities. b) The proposed project will not affect existing recreational opportunity. The site is bordered by residential development to the east and south. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .~..,~y Unless T~lan 16.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ,' ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ( ). (v') environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located within the Exchange Business Complex. The vacant pad contains grass that is maintained once a week. There is no habitat suitable for rare or endangered species and there are no locally protected species on site. The site has no wetland and is cut off by development to the north, east, and west, so it cannot serve as a wildlife corridor. b) The site is too small, slightly larger than 1 acre, and would not generate significant amounts of criteria air pollutants during site grading. No short-term impacts will result from the proposed project. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 00-31- Legends Burgers Page 14 c) The cumulative effects of the proposed project may include incremental increased traffic within the immediate vicinity; however, the impacts are not considered significant. The applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees at time of development. Fees are used to make roadway improvements within the area to keep the circulation system at acceptable levels of service. d) Development of a 3,671 square foot restaurant would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentially significant affect to the environment. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (v') City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981 ) (v')Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (v') CEQA Air Quality Handbook, South Coast Air Quality Management District, November 29, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Condifiona Use Permit 00-31 Public Review Period Closes: November 8, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: Legend Burgers, % Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Camelian Street. APN: 207-031-29. Project Description: The development of a 3,671 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru, on 1.25-acre of land in Office Professional District. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to dete~Tnine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. if adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is inv/ted to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. November 8, 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-31, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 3,671 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU AND A 824 SQUARE FOOT OUTDOOR EATING AREA ON 1.25 ACRE OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-031-29. A. Recitals. 1. Legends Burgers filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 00-31, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of November 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staffreports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Base Line Road east of Carnelian Street, with a street frontage of 191 feet and lot depth of approximately 260 feet, which is presently improved with turf, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveway approaches along both street frontages; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a retail shopping center with a drive- thru restaurant, the property to the south consists of an office/professional center, the property to the east consists of the Villa Del Rey senior housing complex, and the property to the west is commercial/retail and; c. The application contemplates the construction of a restaurant with a drive-thru and outdoor eating area; and d. The site is a freestanding, individually owned parcel within The Exchange office/professional complex; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 00-31 - LEGEND BURGERS November 8, 2000 Page 2 e. The proposed restaurant use will support the pdmary office use of The Exchange office/professional complex and reduce vehicle tdps accordingly; and f. The project meets the basic intent of the Drive-thru Design Policy, in that it is located 200 feet from any residential district, has compatible architectural style with the sun'ounding uses within the center, and the drive-thru lane and parking respect the 45-foot setback from street frontage. g. The parking spaces within The Exchange office/professional complex are available to the proposed restaurant via a reciprocal parking agreement (Declaration of Mutual Grants of Easements recorded January 5, 1988); and h. The project, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, complies with all minimum City development standards; and i. The proposed use is consistent with General Plan objective to provide commercial facilities to meet the service needs of the Community, which are conveniently accessible. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 00-31 - LEGEND BURGERS November 8, 2000 Page 3 depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin,q Division 1) A combination of a Iow decorative wall and dense landscaping shall be incorporated around the west leg of the drive-thru, to provide additional drive-thru screening. 2) All roof and ground-mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened. 3) Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting. 4) Trash enclosure shall feature overhead shade trellis and roll-up door. 5) The applicant shall work with staff to minimize potential conflicts with vehicles exiting the drive-thru and vehicles trying to park in the parking island east of the building. All proposals shall be subject City Planner review and approval. 6) Special paving shall be introduced where pedestrians cross ddve aisles. 7) Provide a trellis element to the blank wall at the northwest corner of the building. 8) All signs proposed for the building shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by the City Planner, prior to installation. En,qineerin.q Division 1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Base Line Road shall be paid to the City, pdor to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2) All missing public improvements along Base Line Road shall be installed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Revise existing City Drawing No. 325 to reflect the said public improvements, including but PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 00-31 - LEGEND BURGERS November 8, 2000 Page 4 not limited to, one 16,000 lumens HPSV street light, and street trees, and protect or replace traffic signage and striping as needed. 3) Provide a copy of CC&Rs to confirm that reciprocal access to all parcels are ensured. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit 00-31 SUBJECT: 3,671 Square foot drive-thru restaurant APPLICANT: Legends Burgers Restaurant LOCATION: South side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees; for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __ __ / Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmentJDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Project No. CUP 00-31 Completion Date 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Shopping Centers 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City / Planner: -- -- -- a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). / b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doom and to / include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / d. Roll-up doors. / e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to / be hidden from view. project No. CUP 00-31 CornDleUon Date 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." 5. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 6.The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. 'It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 7.The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or proiections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 2.For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a Project No. CUP 00-31 Completion Date 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0~5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more m vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. Ail private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced withir 30 days from the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line Road. 9.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Project No. CUP 00-31 Completion Date H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. __/ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /.__/ of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: /.__/ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / / Amhitect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to __/__./ the City prior to permit issuance. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the __/__/__ Building and Safety Division. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be /.__/__ marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. sc-goo Project Nc. CUP 00~31 Completion Date 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commemial or industrial development or addition / / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shalt provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and / / prior to issuance of building permits. 4.Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public /.__ counter). L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bemardino Environmental / / Health Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City .__/ / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & I A.C. I Side-I Drive I Street I Street J comm I Median I Bike J Other ] Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Base Line Road x x (e) Project No. CUP 00-31 Completion Date Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) protect or replace traffic signal and striping. 2. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. O. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ___/ / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. ___/ / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the .~/ / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /~/ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be: /.~/ 2,000 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 5, (b) (Table). -OR A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Projc=ct No. CUP 00-31 Comoletion Date 2. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final /. / inspection. -- 3. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: / / x Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 4. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / / x All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. 5. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be /.__/ submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 6. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga __/ / Fire Protection District as follows: x $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 7. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC, /. / UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. -- -- S, Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. Places of assembly (except churches, schools, and other non-profit organizations). ___/ / b. Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). Storage of readily _._/ / combustible material. c. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). ~__/__ NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. ~__/ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. sc.6-oo 6 Project No. CUP 00-31 Completion Date 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/ / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / U. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within ~__/__ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. / / V, Windows 1. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / / W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. X, Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed, Instructing management and / / employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488, / / THE CITY OF I~AN C 11 0 CUCAHONGA DATE: November 8, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner BY: Mike Smith, Planning Technician SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Wireless Ordinance, Chapter 17.26 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, to allow the development of major wireless communication facilities within 300 feet of a residential structure or residential district. BACKGROUND: The Rancho Cucamonga Development: Code defines a wireless communication facility as a facility that is used for the reception and transmission of cellular personal phone services and/or data radio communications. Typically, these facilities consist of a pole, antenna array, and base transceiver equipment. The Development Code separates wireless communication facilities into two types: major and minor. These two types of facilities are defined in Section 17.26.020 (see Exhibit "A"). The primary element that differentiates a major facility from a minor facility is the overall height of the pole. Poles that exceed the maximum height requirement of the surrounding zone are classified as major facilities. In general, minor facilities may be located in all zones, including residential zones, provided they meet the development criteria set forth in Section 17.26.030 through 17.26.050 (Exhibit "A"). However, major wireless facilities are limited to sites that are at least 500 feet from a residential structure, residential district, or other major wireles~ facility. The purpose of this requirement is to limit the negative visual impact such a facility would have on the surrounding neighborhoods. ANALYSIS: Clear, uninterrupted wireless communication service is dependent on adequate coverage. Vadous factors, including topography, the presence of tall structures, and the distance between facilities, can affect the quality and the strength of the communication signal. Therefore, most wireless companies will locate and construct their facilities according to the need to overceme these limitations. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 8, 2000 Page 2 Because of the 500-foot minimum distance requirement, most of the City west of Haven Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard, and the majority of the Etiwanda areas, would be "off-limits" to facility siting (see Exhibit "B"). Thus, locations where cellular services would be needed most, such as major streets, commercial areas, and the new Foothill Freeway (SR-30), would have limited coverage. Facilities that do not exceed the height requirement of the surrounding zone may be located within 500 feet of residences. However, the number of these shorter, minor communication facilities would need to be greater to achieve the same level of coverage as a taller, major communication facility. Furthermore, the aesthetic impact of these minor facilities on the surrounding neighborhoods would increase. Most wireless communication providers are able to disguise their facilities in a manner that is unobtrusive. Generally, these providers are willing to work with staff in designing facilities that blend into their surroundings to minimize their visual presence. Designs that mimic trees work especially well when other living trees are in the vicinity. Staff believes that reducing the distance requirement from 500 feet to 300 feet will mutually benefit the wireless companies and the City. The locations where a major facility may be located will increase to include "pockets" where their presence will have limited visual impact (Exhibit "C"). The proposed change is indicated on the attached excerpt, Section 17.26.030(A)(5) of the Development Code (Exhibit "D"). This amendment will continue to protect the interest of the City's residents while allowing the wireless communication companies to provide adequate service. All major wireless facilities will continue to be subject to the Conditional Use Permit process and review by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 00-03 to the City Council. City Planner BB:MS\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Development Code Section 17.26.020 through 17.26.050 Exhibit "B" - Major Wireless Communication Facility Exclusion Zones at 500 feet and 300 feet Exhibit "C" - Potential Major Wireless Locations with 300-foot Distance Buffer Exhibit "D"- Development Code Section 17.26.30(A)(5) with Amendment Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment 00-03 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.26. Ol 0 & 17. 26.020 CHAPTER 17.26 Wireless Communications Facilities Section 17.26.010 - Purpose A. The purpose of these regulations and guidelines is to regulate the establishment of wireless communication facilities and thereby protect the public health, safety, general welfare, and quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga, while preserving the rights of wireless communications providers. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found and determined that these regulations and guidelines for wireless communication facilities are necessary to attain these goals. These regulations are intended to supersede applicable provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code pertaining to communication facilities, and to establish flexible guidelines for the govemanco of wireless communication facilities which recognize the unique land use distribution, topography, and aesthetic charectedsfics of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Wireless communications facilities are prohibited in the City of Rancho Cucamonga except as otherwise provided herein. Section 17.26.020 - Definitions Unless otherwise stated, the following definitions pertain to this Chapter: A ANTENNA: means a device used in wireless communications which radiates and/or receives commercial cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio signals. "Antenna" shall not include any satellite dish antenna or any antenna utilized fo[ amateur radio, citizens band radio, television, AM/FM, or shortwave radio reception purposes. B BUILDING-MOUNTED: means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a building, or to the side of another structure such as a water tank, church steeple, freestanding sign, utility tower, light pole, or similar structure, but not to include the roof of any structure. C CELLULAR: means an analog or digital wireless communication technology that is based on a system of interconnected neighboring cell sites. CO-LOCATED: means the locating of wireless communications equipment from more than one provider on a single wireless communication facility. G GROUND-MOUNTED: means mounted to a pole, monopole, tower, or other freestanding structure specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna. M MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communication facility that is ground- or roof-mounted or mounted in or on any public property including the public right- of-way. MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communication facility that is stealth in design and does not exceed the height limit of the district in which it is.located, or bui;ding-, facade-, or wall-mounted and does not exceed the height of the parapet wall or roof line 17.26-1 10/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.26.020 & 17.26.030 of the building. A roof-mounted facility which is screened by a solid material on all four sides and does not exceed the maximum height of the district shall be considered a minor wireless communication facility. MONOPOLE: means a structure composed of a single spire, pole, or tower used to support antennas or related equipment. MOUNTED: means attached or supported. : . P PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICF' means digital Iow-power, high-frequency commercial wireless radio communication technology that has the capacity for multiple communications services and the routing of calls to individuals, regardless of location. R ROOF-MOUNTED: means mounted above the eave line of a building. S STEALTH FACILITY: means any ~3mmunication facility which is designed to blend into the surrounding environment, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, and shall include and mean any concealed antenna. T TEMPORARY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communication facility that is kept pcrtable or mobile and deployed while a permanent facility is under construction. W WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACIMTY: means a facility consisting of any commercial antenna, monopole, microwave dish, and/or other related equipment necessary to the transmissioh and/or reception of cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio communications, and which has been granted a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, or a Wireless Registration Number by the California Public Utilities Commission, or otherwise provides wireless communications services to the public. Section 17.26.030 - Development Criteria for All Wireless Communication Facilities. A. Screeninq and Site Se ection Guidelines, 1. Stealth facilities and concealed antennas are preferred. 2. Wireless communications facilities shall be located where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. Where insufficient screening exists, applicants shall provide screening satisfactory to the City Planner, or as otherwise required herein. 3. Ground-mounted wireless communication.facilities shall be located only in close proximity to existing above-ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility poles (which.are not scheduled for removal or undergrounding for at least 18 months after the date of~ application), light poles, trees of comparable heights, and in areas where they will not detract from the appearance of the City. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference: a. Co-located with other major wireless communication facilities. 17.26-2 10/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.26. 030 b. On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, or utility facilities. c. On existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles. d. In industrial districts. e. In commercial districts. f. In residential districts (minor wireless communications facilities only). 5. Major wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 500 feet of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within 500 feet of any existing, legally established major wireless communication facility except as follows: a. When co-located on the, same building, structure, or wireless facility. b. The facility replaces or modifies an existing facility for purposes of co-location. For the purposes of this Chapter, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to in!ervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the nearest property line of any residential land use, or to the nearest point of another major wireless communication facility. B. Development Requirements. 1. As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall be required to provide written documentation demonstrating good faith efforts in locating facilities in accordance with the Site Selection Guidelines (order of preference). 2. Wireless communication facilities shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other required seals or legally required signage. 3. All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless communication facility shall be located within a building, enclosure, or underground vault that complies with the development standards of the district in which the accessory equipment is located, subject to City approval. If the equipment is permitted to be located above ground, it shall be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and include sufficient landscaping to screen the structure from view. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be subdued colors and non-reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and colors. 5. All screening for building-mounted facilities shall be compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and/or materials of the building. 6. Monopoles and antennas shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimensions than is necessary for the proper functioning of the wireless communications 17.26-3 10/99 Rancho Cucamonga DeVelopment Code Sections 17.26.040 - 17.26.070 facility. The applicant shall provide documentation satisfactory to the City Planner establishing compliance with this subsection. -~ Section 17,26,040 - Approval of Minor Wireless Communication Facilities. Minor wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner pursuant to Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review procedures of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. In considering applications for minor wireless communication facilities, the City Planner shall be guided by both the provisions of Section 17.06.020 and this Chapter. However, in the event of any inconsistency in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17,020.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. ~ Section 17,26,050 - Approval of Major Wireless Communication Facilities, Major wireless communication facilities sh~,ll be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In considering applications for major wireless communications facilities, the Planning Commission shall be guided by the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and this Chapter. However, in the event of any inconsistencies in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed in writing within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 17.26.051 - Deployment of Temporary Facility. A temporary wireless communication facility may be deployed subject to approval by the City Planner and the following: : 1. A permanent wireless communication facility has been approved for the property in question. 2. The temporary facility was approved as part of the conditional use permit or minor development review. 3. The facility is deployed for no more than 6 months, provided that two extensions may be granted by the City Planner; however, the total period shall not exceed one year. Section 17,26,060 - Height Criteria for Major Wireless Communications Facilities. No wireless Communications facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable district unless the facility is utilized by two or more wireless communication providers pursuant to a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may consider approval of facilities proposed to exceed the maximum height limit subject to the review and a>proval of a conditional use permit application pursuant to Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 17.26,070 - Conditional Use Permit Required. Each major wireless communication facility for which an application is made during the term of this Chapter must first receive final approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As a condition of issuance of a conditional use permit for a facility utilizing the public right-of-way, an applicant may be required to enter into a franchise agreement with the City. 17.26-4 10/99 Major Wireless Communication Faml~t7 E~clus~on Zones atouu' and 3~0' 8TH . ~ 6TH EXHIBIT 'B' ' ,, Amendment 00-03 Proposed 300' Buffer Potential Major Wireless Facility Sites HILLSIDE following Development Code amendment 1. Beryl Park 2. Heritage Park 3. Stater Bros. Center 4. Hermosa Park BANYAN 5. Haven Village Shopping Ctr. 6. Chaffey College 7. Terra Vista Village 8. Vineyards Marketplace 9. Windrows Park 10. SCE Utility Corridor 11. Vintage Park 12. Central Park Plaza 13. Milliken Park BASE LINE 44. coyote cyn Park 15. RC Central Park (prop.) 16. Etiwanda Creek Park 17. Rancho Terrace t t8. Foothill Wllage t t9. Thomas Winery '} 20. Albertson's Ctr FOOTHILL 24. Red Hill Park . 22. Sunrise Ctr 23. Old City Hall 24. Alta Loma Square ARROW i 25. ~ctoria ~,ege t 26. Victoria Lakes Park (prop.) 8TH ~ ~ ...... ~ Note: Potential sites on school campuses are not named. ~ 300' Buffer ~ Schools campuses ~ Major Roeds/Highways 4T~ ,',, ,, Sphere of Influence Bounda~ ~ ~',,,~ C~ty Boundary ~ Flood Control Zones EXI-I IT 'C' = Utilitycorfldor ~ Residential Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.26.030 b. On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, or utility facilities. c. On existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles. d. In industrial districts. e. In commemial districts. f. In residential districts (minor wireless communications facilities only). ior wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within.~,580 feet of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within~5~ eet of any existing, legally established major wireless communication facility except a~ follows: a. When co-located on the same building, structure, or wireless facility. b. The facility replaces or modifies an existing facility for purposes of co-location. For the purposes of this Chapter, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the nearest property line of any residential land use, or to the · nearest point of another major wireless communication facility. B. Development Re(;uirements. 1. As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall be required to provide written documentation demonstrating good faith efforts in locating facilities in accordance with the Site Selection Guidelines (order of preference). 2. Wireless communicetion facilities shall not bear any signs or edvertising devices other than certification, warning, or other required seals or legally required signage. 3. All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wiretess communication facility shall be located within a building, enclosure~ or underground vault that complies with the development standards of the district in which the accessory equipment is located, subject to City appl=0val. If the equipment is permitted to be located above ground, it shall be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and inctude sufficient landscaping to screen the structure fi.om view. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be subdued colors and non-reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and colors. :; ;.~" ,~ ,. · ,. · .~-'· 5..--"-Ali screening for building-mounted facilities shall be compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and/or materials of the building. 6. Monopoles and antennas shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimensions than is necessary for the proper functioning of the wireless communications 17.26-3 10/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.26.040- 17.26.070 facility. The applicant shall provide documentation satisfactory to the City Planner establishing compliance with this subsection. Section 17.26.040. Approval of Minor Wireless Communication Facilities. Minor wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner pursuant to Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review procedures of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. In considering applications for minor wireless communication facilities, the City Planner shall be guided by both the provisions of Section 17.06.020 and this Chapter. However, in the event of any inconsistency in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.020.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section '17.26.050 - Approval of Major Wireless Communication Facilities. Major wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In considering applications for major wireless communications facilities, the Planning Commission shall .be guided by the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and this Chapter. However, in the event of any inconsistencies in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed in writing within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section '17.26.051 - Deployment of Temporary Facility. A temporary wireless communication facility may be deployed subject to approval by the City Planner and the following: ~ 1. A permanent wireless communication facility has been approved for the property in question. 2. Th~ temporary facility was approved as part of the conditional use permit or minor development review. I 3. The facility is deployed for no more than 6 months, provided that two extensions may be granted by the City Planner; however, the total period shall not exceed one year. Section 17.26.060 - Height Criteria for Major Wireless Communications Facilities. No wireless communications facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable district unless the facility is utilized by two or more wireless communication providers pursuant to a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may consider approval of facilities proposed to exceed the maximum height limit subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit application pursuant to Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 17.26.070 -Conditional Use Permit Required. Each major wireless communication facility for which an application is made during the {erm of this Chapter must first receive final approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As a condition of issuance of a conditional use permit for a facility utilizing the public right-of-way, an applicant may be required to enter into a franchise agreement with the City. 17.26-4 10/99 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE WIRELESS ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES WITHIN 300 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code Amendment 00-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of November 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that; all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public heating on November 8, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to preper~j located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and b. The application contemplates reducing the minimum distance from a residential structure, residential district, or another major wireless communication facility that a major wireless communication facility may be located; and c. The minimum distance will be changed from the existing 500 feet to a proposed 300 feet; and d. The proposed amendment applies only to major wireless communication facilities as defined in the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dudng the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DCA 00-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 8, 2000 Page 2 a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and with related development. The amendment will offer greater siting opportunities for major wireless communication facilities; and b. The proposed amendment, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The amendment allows for improved service coverage within the City in a manner which is less obtrusive and visually obstructive to the community; and c. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based on substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 00-03 as shown in Exhibit "A" of the staff report. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ]~AN ClIO CUCAI'IONGA DATE: November 8, 2000 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission F-RO~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMEN ~ CO. - A review of the previously certified Environmental impact Report and the consideration of approving the Statement of Findings and Overriding Consideration for the proposed project known as Victoria Arbors village. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this hearing is to determine that the Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) covers the proposed project; and to forward a recommendation to approve the Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations to the City Council for the approval of the proposed project. BACKGROUND: In January of 1998, the applicant submitted multiple land use amendments to the City. Because there were substantial changes to the land use, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required. The EIR was completed and processed according to California Environmental Quality Act (CECA). In July of 1999, with the Planning Commission recommendations, the City Council certified the EIR to be complete and adequate. The related proposed land use amendments were not approved because the Planning Commission was still reviewing them. At the time, the City was also taking on a Citywide General Plan Update. In September of 1999, the applicant requested putting his land use applications on hold indefinitely sensing that the Planning Commission and the City Council would not be supportive of the proposed changes. The General Plan Update is well on its way and a preferred land use plan has been established for the area of the applicant's proposal. The applicant attended the General Plan Subcommittee meetings and understands the direction the City is heading towards with respect to land use in the project area. As a result, the applicant requested reconsideration of their application. The review and approval of the land use amendments necessitates the review and approval of the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Is Proposed Proiect Covered by the Certified EIR: As mentioned before, the EIR was certified by the City Council on July 7, 2000. To ensure that the Certified EIR will provide environmental clearances, staff compared the proposed project with the one described in the EIR along with the five alternatives that were considered. Staff determined that the proposed project is similar and rated better when compared to the one considered by the EIR. The proposed project has addressed some of the Land Use impacts, the Park and Recreation impacts, and Aesthetic and Visual impacts identified in the EIR. The other significant environmental impacts still apply and are listed and discussed in the attached May 26, 1999, Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit "C"). The significant impacts are: Traffic and Cimulatio,n, Noise, Air Quality, Biological Resources, School, Police and Fire Resources, and Geologic. B. Summary of Si.qnificant Impacts and Mitiqation: The Certified EIR contained a section that described and summarized the significant impacts resulting with the proposed project and the mitigation measures required to reduce the level of significance for each impact to an acceptable level (Exhibit "D"). C. Unavoidable Impacts: According to the EIR, all impacts except for long-term air quality impacts, will be reduced to insignificant levels with mitigation measures. The EIR found that emissions for carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for daily operations by a large margin. Even with implementation of mitigation, air quality impacts cannot be reduced to insignificant levels. The City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, State law provides that the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. A Statement of Facts and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Exhibit "F") have been prepared for Planning Commission review. D. Mitiqation Monitorinq Pro.qram (MMP): In compliance with CEQA, the City prepared a monitoring program (Exhibit "E"). The MMP is a reporting program, which identifies each adopted mitigation or required change in the project design that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three, 4- by 8-foot public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet around the project site. In addition, key community representatives and residents of the Victoria Planned Community and the Etiwanda Community have been mailed notices of this pubic hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the attached Statement of Facts and Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the proposed Victoria Arbors project. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF'~Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Area Map Exhibit "B"-City Council Resolution No. 99-148, Certifying EIR Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 26, 1999 Exhibit "D" - Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Exhibit "E"- Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit "F" - Statements of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations Resolution Recommending Adoption of Statements of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations to the City Council ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROJECT AREA SPRR ' LM LM'~ LM ~. (ESP} ~ OP !SP) LL LEGEND H= High Residential LM = Low-Medium Residential M = Medium Residential MH = Medium-High Residential MU = Mixed Use OS = Open Space RC = Regional Center RR = Regional Related Commercial VC = Village Commercial ~.~.Project boundary for EIR Village boundary EXHIBIT 'A' (~ ~ N~ RESOLUTION NO. 99-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AS HAVING BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) A. RECITALS. 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) consisting of that document entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01" has been presented to this Council for the Council's consideration of the General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. 2. The public comment period for the EIR was duly and lawfully closed on May 17, 1999, following due notices to the public and all applicable public agencies. 3. On May 26, 1999, the Planning Coromission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the certification of. the EIR. 4. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaroonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the certification of the EIR. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby fo~:nd, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the GPA 98-02 above-referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff ¥CPA 98-01 reports, together with public testiroony, and the consideration of the contents of ESPA 98-01 the Final EIR, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Exhibit "B'.' Resolution No. 99-148 Page 2 a. The Final EIR prepared for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01 has been completed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") with the State and City Guidelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations and, b. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council and that the Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR pdor to the Council consideration of the proposed project. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7~ day of July, 1999. AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None William J. Alexaper, Mayor / ATTEST: Debra J. Ada~ I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7~ day of July, 1999. Executed this 8~' day of July, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. . ~ ~ ~:~ Debra J. Adams,~,l~C, City Clerk Resolution CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: May 26, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner Duane Morita, Contract Planner Lynn Calvert-Hayes, Environmental Consultant SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors Village on 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street, future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek Channel - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and 36; 222-201-33; 227-161-33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. (A) Land Use changes for the following areas: Subarea 1: Subarea la - from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facilities to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7.67 acres of land, generally located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of the winery; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities. Subarea lb - from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Park, and School for approximately 57.40 acres of land, generally located east of futura Day Creek Boulevard and 600 feet south of Base Line Road; and the consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities for the northeast side of the subarea, immediately east of the winery. Subarea lc - from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) GPA 98-02 to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 21.13 VCPA 98-01 acres of land for the area generally located south of Base Line Road and ESPA 98-01 east of future Victoria Park Lane; and consideration of retaining the Low-Medium Residential designation. Exhibit "C" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 2 Subarea ld- from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Regional Related Office/Commercial, and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 39.45 acres of land, generally located on the north side of future Church Street and east of future Day Creek Boulevard; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea le - from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 13.76 acres of lan, d, generally located north of future Church Street, west of future Victoria Loop Street; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea 2 - from Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 53 acres of land, generally located on the west side of future Day Creek Boulevard, north and south of future Church Street; and consideration of retaining the Regional Related Office/Commercial designation. Subarea 3- Re-align the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 26 acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue; and a request to change the land use designation from Office to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan with an Office designation or a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). (B) Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. (C) Amend various graphics and text for the Victoria Community Plan. (D) Consideration by the City of altemative sites for Park and School within the project area of the Victoria Community Plan. (E) Modify the permitted and conditionally permitted uses and various development and design standards for Regional Related Office/Commercial, Regional Center, and Community Facilities of the Victoria Community Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to re-align the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by re-designating approximately 26 acres of land, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue to the Victoria Community Plan; and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and retaining the land use designation of Office; and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Victoda Community Plan Amendment 98-01. ABSTRACT: This is a public headng for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as part of the required 45-day public review period after a Notice of Completion and Availability for Public Review of the Draft EIR was advertised in the newspaper. For this headng, the Planning Commission should review the report, receive public comments, conclude the public headng, discuss, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding EIR certification. BACKGROUND: The applicant, American Beauty Development Co., first contacted the City in July of 1997 and informed staff of their property ownership of Victoda Lakes. As a result of reviewing their preliminary development concepts, staff determined that the proposed changes in land use, circulation, open space, and park were significant and would require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and multiple land use amendment applications. In January of 1998, the applicant formally submitted their General Plan, Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment applications. After selecting LSA, Inc. as the City's consultant, preparation of the EIR commenced in Apdl of 1998. The Draft EIR was completed last December and circulated for public review. Because additional land use impacts and feasible land use alternatives were identified, the land use and altematives sections of the Draft EIR were revised and re-circulated on Apdl 1, 1999 with the public review pedod ending on May 17, 1999. ANALYSIS: A. Purpose of an EIR: The purpose of the Environmental Impact Report is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. Contents of the EIR become a planning tool for the Planning Commission and the City Council to use in determining the appropriate and the best land use arrangement for the project area and for the entire City. According to the State Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), once the EIR is completed, the City is required to make the determination of certifying the EIR within one year. Staff would like to stress that the certification of an EIR would only mean that the EIR is adequate and in compliance with CEQA. The certification of an EIR does not mean or imply support or approval of the proposed project. The proposed project must be reviewed on its own medts. The Draft Final EIR consolidates the first and the re-circulated draft EIR's into one document, is listed as Exhibit "A" and is a separate document from the staff report. B. EIR Process for GPA 98-01, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01: The EIR has been processed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 4 1. Notice of Preparation (NOP): A NOP for the EIR was prepared by the City and distributed on Apd127, 1998. The NOP, describing the proposed applications and land use amendments and issues to be addressed, was distributed to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, and other interested parties for a 30-day review pedod. The objective for distributing the NOP is to identify and determine the full range and scope of environmental issues of concern so that these issues could be fully evaluated in the EIR. Comments received dudng the NOP process have been addressed in the applicable sections of the EIR. 2. Public Scopinq MeetinR: The City held a noticed Public Scoping Meeting at the City on May 12, 1998. Responsible agencies, property owners within 1,000 feet around the project site, and key community representatives were invited to attend the meeting. Besides membem of staff, consultants, and applicant, a total of 12 residents attended the meeting. Four of the residents were high school students, who attended the meeting for a school project. The remainder attendees were from the residential area west of the Day Creek Channel and east of Rochester Avenue. The intent of the Public Scoping Meeting was to receive public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as related to the project and environment. The three pdmary issues raised by the attendees at the meeting were parkland, school, and traffic impacts. 3. Draft EIR Circulation, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Availability: The Draft EIR was completed on December 18, 1998, and circulated according to CEQA requirements with the 45-day public review pedod ending on February 9, 1999. The Notice of Availability for public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on December 18, 1998. A copy of the Draft EIR was made available to the public at the City Planning Division and Library. Atotal of five agencies provided wdtten comments on the Draft EIR. They are: Southern California Association of Governments; Governor's Office of Planning and Research; State Department of Conservation; California Department of Transportation (District 8); and South Coast Air Quality District. No comments were received from the general public. Our consultant, LSA, prepared responses to each environmental-related comment received, which are included in the Draft Final EIR. 4. Re-circulated Draft EIR, Revised Notice of Completion, and Revised Notice of Availability: Dudng the 45-day public review pedod for the Draft EIR, based on discussions at the workshops with the Planning Commission and the applicant, there were additional land use issues and impacts identified that needed further analysis. As a result, the land use, the alternatives, and the biological resources sections of the Draft EIR were revised. According to CEQA, the proposed revisions necessitated the re- circulation of those revised sections of the Draft EIR. The following summarizes the changes: · The Land Use section was revised to better discuss the project's land use compatibility with the adjacent Filippi Winery located on Base Line Road, the Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist Temple located on Etiwanda Avenue, and the future planned regional commercial center south of Church Street. Additional mitigation was provided to reduce the project's impacts on land use compatibility. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 5 · The Alternatives section was revised to better discuss the reasons those particular 'alternatives were evaluated in the Draft EIR. Also discussed was the reason an alternative location to the proposed project was not evaluated in the document. A new Alternative 5 was also added which included a Special Overlay District in the area of the historic winery property to provide better buffering between future residential and commercial uses west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Church Street. · The Biology section was revised to analyze the impacts associated with retaining the 0.97-acre wetland on site. The applicant has obtained a Nationwide 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which allows retention of 0.97 acres of wetland onsite. · The Sumr~ary of Impact section was revised to correct typographical errors that were made with the Draft EIR. New land use and biological mitigation measures were also included. The revised Draft EIR was completed and re-circulated on April 1, 1999, according to CEQA requirements with the 45-day public review period ending on May 17, 1999. A Notice of Completion of the Revised Draft EIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse and the Notice of Availability for public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 1, 1999. A total of five agencies provided written comments on the re-circulated Draft EIR, including. Southem California Association of Governments; Governor's Office of Planning and Research; California Department of Conservation; California Department of Transportation (District 8); and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. No comments were received from the general public. Again, our consultant has prepared responses to each environmental-related comment received, which are included in the Draft Final EIR. 5. Miti.qation Monitorinq Proqram (MMP): In compliance with CEQA, the City has prepared a monitoring program as shown in Exhibit "D." The MMP is a reporting program which identifies each adopted mitigation or required change in the project design that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure. 6. Statement of Facts and Findin.qs: CEQA states that the City cannot approve any project for which an EIR was prepared which identifies one or more significant effects unless certain findings are made and statement of facts are considered. A Statement of Facts and Findings has been prepared for this project as shown in Exhibit "E." 7. Statement of Overridinq Consideration= If significant unavoidable environmental impacts ...... result with a project, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for this project as shown in Exhibit "F." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98~01 May 26, 1999 Page 6 C. Summary of Si.qnificant Impacts and Miti.qation: This section describes and summarizes potentially significant impacts resulting with the proposed project and those mitigation measures being recommended to reduce the level of significance for each impact as shown in Exhibit "C.'~ 1. Land Use: Impacts: The proposed residential project is incompatible with surrounding commercial land uses including the Filippi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple, the future regional mall, and the adjacent 1-15 freeway. Mitiqation: The EIR finds that implementation of noise and aesthetic mitigation measures, however, can reduce any potential incompatibility to an insignificant level. Examples of mitigation measures are: 8-foot high sound walls and/or earthem berms, 20-foot wide parkway landscape buffers, additional 25-foot setbacks from the property boundaries for dwellings, etc., The detailed description of the mitigation is listed in Exhibit "C." The EIR finds that the mitigation measures can provide the buffedng between the incompatible land uses. Impacts: The project conflicts with the land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoda Community Plan, which shows 26 acres of lakes open space on site. . Mitiqation: The EIR, however, finds that implementation of public services and aesthetic mitigation measures can reduce any potential conflict to an insignificant level. The detailed description of the mitigation is as listed in Exhibit "C." Impact: The project creates a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and creates a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan. Miti.qation: Again, the EIR finds that implementation of air quality, noise, public services, and aesthetic mitigation measures as listed in Exhibit "C" can reduce any potential impact to an insignificant level. Staff Comment: Although the EIR finds that there are mitigation measures that can reduce the negative impacts and provide the buffedng between incompatible land uses, staff believes that the approach is contrary to the goals and objectives of the General Plan, which states that land use shall be organized to avoid creating conflicts and nuisances. In analyzing the land use amendments, which will be reviewed and considered by the Commission at the June 9, 1999, meeting, staff believes that the current plan for the project site is far supedor environmentally and fiscally than the proposed plan (project), where a Statement of Overriding Considerations would not be needed. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 7 2. Traffic and Circulation: impact: The project will have an increase in traffic. A Traffic Study was prepared, which concludes that the following key intersections and freeway interchanges are impacted, which need improvements: · Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard · Victoda Park Lane/Base Line Road · Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue · Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street · Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road · Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue · Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route · Etiwanda Avenue/San Bemardino Avenue · East Avenue/Base Line Road · Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road · 1-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road · SR-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue · SR-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue · 1-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue · 1-10 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue · 1-15 Northbound - Jurupa Avenue to Sierra Avenue · 1-15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue Mitiqation: The applicant will contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's Traffic Fee Program for backbone infrastructure and will contribute on a fair-share basis to traffic mitigation determined by the City Engineer for those roadways and segments that will be directly affected by the proposed project. In addition, prior to apProval of any tract map, a traffic study will be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic resulting with the particular tract map will cause any of the affected intersections to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If this occurs, the traffic study will determine required improvements, phasing of improvements, and funding sources. Based on the mitigation, the traffic impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels. 3. Air Quality: Impact: The short and long term air quality impacts as a result of the proposed project will exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Mitiqation: The EIR finds that the impacts coming from the grading and construction activities can be mitigated to insignificant levels. However, the emissions from increased vehicular trips, even with mitigation measures, will continue to exceed SCAQMD. This PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 8 is considered an unavoidable adverse impact of the project. This issue will be further discussed in Section D of the report. 4. Noise: Impact:'The Noise Study that was prepared for the Draft EIR finds that noise will be generated from grading and construction activities as well as from increased traffic generation. Mitiqation: The EIR finds that Implementation of mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "C "will reduce impact to a level of insignificance. 5. Schools: Impact: The project area is within the Etiwanda School Distdct and Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Schools within the two districts are at or above cepacity. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts. The total number of students generated by the project is based on the number of dwelling units for each land use category multiplied by the student generation rates from both school districts. The increased number of new students estimated for each of the two school districts are 597 students for K-Grade 5; 265 students for Grades 6-8; and 274 students for Grades 9-12. A total of 1,136 new students will be generated with the project. Miti.qation: Beceuse the proposed project includes a new 10-acre school site, the EIR finds that it will help to accommodate students in K-Grade 5. To further reduce the impact to a less than signiflcent level, the EIR requires that the applicent execute an agreement with the two districts to provide adequate mitigation and participate in the school districts' Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts for alternative methods to finance the mitigation of school impacts. 6. Parks and Recreation: Impact: The residential portion of the proposed project will increase the demand for parklands within the Victoda Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. The project should provide 18.43 acres of parkland for its areas within the Victoda Community Plan and an additional 2.25 acres of parkland for its areas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan; for a total of 20.68 acres of parkland. As proposed, the project will only provide a total of 13.8 acres of active recreational facilities, thus, resulting in a deficiency of 6.98 acres which is a potentially significent impact to park facilities. MitiRation: To mitigate the impact to an insignificant level, the EIR finds that the applicant shall be responsible for the 20.68 acres of parkland by dedication or by fee. Further, a mitigation listed in the EIR requires the applicant to design and construct a park. Impact: The project will increase the demands for active recreational facilities including trails. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 9 Miti.qation: To mitigate the impacts, the EIR finds that future development proposals must provide additional acreage for trails to meet City needs. In addition, the applicant shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, the community trails within the Victoda Community Plan, and the 25-foot parkway on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard including the multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Compliance with these recommended mitigation measures reduces park and recreational impacts to levels of insignificance. 7. Police and Fire Protection: Impact: Future development within the project area will place considerable demand on law enforcement ~nd fire protection services. Miti.qation: The impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level by forming and/or joining the Law Enforcement and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts to pay for and provide services to the project area. 8. Aesthetics/Visual: Impact: The project will replace 19 acres of proposed lakes and open space, resulting in a loss of planned open space, and alteration of existing and futura public views and view corridors. .. Mitiqation: The EIR finds that the applicant should account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within the residential area. The focal point should include open space trail system linkages to the winer,/site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corddor incorporating such features as fountains, large gazebos, public art, public furniture, and/or increase open space/trails systems. The EIR finds that with these mitigation measures, impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels. Impact: New light and glare will also be created with the project. Miti.qation: The City's Design Review process will be the mechanism to ensure excessive light and/or glare is not created by futura development. 9. Biolo.ical Resources: Impact: The project will diminish habitat for wildlife or plants consuming 181.2 acres of alluvial fan coastal sage scrub. Mitiqation: Even though the project will substantially diminish habitat for wildlife and plants, the EIR finds that the potential impact is insignificant in this case because the quality of the alluvial fan coastal sage scrub is poor, and rare, threatened or endangered species were not observed on site. The EIR did not recommend mitigation for the loss of the habitat. However, the EIR finds that the cumulative impact is considered to be significant and recommends that the applicant participate in an off-site mitigation bank PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 10 to provide compensation for the loss of the habitat but with a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Staff Comments: According to the Intedm Review Guidelines contained in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)for the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the City is the lead agency which retains the discretion to make the determination whether a project within the MSHCP area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning. In this case, staff concurs with the findings of the EIR that the impact is insignificant because of the poor quality of the alluvial fan coastal sage habitat and that there were no rare, threatened or endangered species sighted. Presently, there are tremendous development pressures in the City and the project area is aJready surrounded by development. However, within the City's sphere of influence is the North Etiwanda area, which contains better to pristine quality alluvial fan coastal sage scrub habitats. Therefore, the long term preservation planning of the habitats is not precluded. Based on this analysis, staff determines that the cumulative impact is insignificant and does not warrant mitigation. Impact: The proposed project contains 4.1 acres of man-made wetlands. The applicant processed and received a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to remove 3 acres with the agreement of preserving 0.97 acres on site and participating in off-site mitigation bank for the loss of 0.4 acres. Retention may have an impact on the City's ability to maintain the wetland and improve or divert flows in the drainage system to the north. Additionally, retention of the wetland may increase the presence of vectors. Miti.qation: If the City chooses to eliminate the onsite wetland, .an Individual 404 permit must first be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 10. Cultural Resources: There are no known historic human burials and/or cultural materials present on site. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered, ground disturbing activities will be redirected and a qualified archaeologist will be retained to evaluate the find. If human remains are encountered, the San Bemardino County Coroner must be notified. If human remains are considered prehistoric, the Native Amedcan Hedtage Commission will be notified. 11. Geologic: Staff and consultant did not list geology as an impact because the project site is not within a Fault Zone or subject to liquefaction according to the City's General Plan, However, the California Division of Mines and Geology responded to the Draft EIR stating that the site is subject to significant ground motion and recommended that more stringent design standards for structures, especially schools, be applied. Staff has acknowledged this issue and will place a condition of approval for any proposed development within the project site requiring a geotechnical study on liquefaction and ground motion to be conducted by a registered engineering geologist and submitted to the City for review. Staff has forwarded the comments from the Division of Mines and Geology to the City's Building and Safety Division and Etiwanda School District. Staff will be contacting the State geologist to obtain information and supporting documents for our upcoming General Plan Study. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 11 D. Unavoidable Impacts: According to the EIR, all impacts except for long-term air quality impacts, will be reduced to insignificant levels with mitigation measures. The EIR finds that emissions for carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for daily operations by a large margin. Even with implementation of mitigation, air quality impacts cannot be reduced to insignificant levels. As discussed previously, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. A Statement of Facts and Findings (Exhibit "E") and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Exhibit "F") has been prepared for Planning Commission review. E. Alternatives Considered: As required by CEQA, a total of five alternatives were evaluated, including No Project/No Development; Existing Victoda Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan; Low Medium Density Residential; School/Park; and Increased Regional Retail/Special Use Zone alternatives. 1. Alternative 1 - No ProiectJNo Development Alternative Under this alternative, the project site will remain in its existing vacant condition. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project will be .avoided, especially the proposed project's impacts on air quality. 2. Alternative 2 - Existino Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan This alternative assumes the project site will be developed according to plans of the Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. Under the Victoria Lakes Village Plan of the Victoda Community Plan, the project site is designated for higher residential densities. The character of the lakes was to be formed by the unique relationship of the residential, commercial, and recreational land uses surrounding a system of three terraced lakes. Under this alternative, the areas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan would be developed Office/Professional. This alternative would result in greater impacts to air quality; noise; traffic; and police, fire, and school services because a greater number of dwelling units and land use intensity would be provided. However, this alternative would have less incompatible land uses and would require less land use mitigation. This alternative would reduce aesthetic impacts by providing more open space acreage in the form of a tiered lake feature from Base Line Road to Church Street. 3. Alternative 3 - Low Medium Density Residential Alternative This alternative would develop the project site as Low-Medium Density Residential (4 to 8 units per acre) north of Church Street, south of Base Line Road, between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoda Loop. The Office/Professional designation would be eliminated and replaced with Low-Medium Density Residential. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 12 With exception of impacts to public services, this alternative would result in impacts at the same levels or less than the proposed project. Unavoidable significant air quality impacts would continue to result with this alternative. Increased burden on police, fire, and school services would result. 4. Alternative 4 - School/Park Alternative This alternative would develop a school and park next to the winery, south of Base Line Road and west of Victoria Loop. An open space corridor would extend from the wetland area west of Victoria Loop south to Church Street. Proposed land uses west of Etiwanda and north of Church Street would remain Office/Professional; areas between Victoria Loop on the west, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, Base Line to the north and Church Street oa the south would be designated Low-Medium. An Office/Professional buffer adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue would be provided. With exception of impacts to public services, this alternative would result in impacts at the same levels or less than the proposed project. Unavoidable significant air quality impacts would continue to result with this alternative. Increased burden on police and fire services would result. This altemative would provide an aesthetic benefit by providing a view shed corridor south through the park/school site from Base Line Road. 5. Alternative 5 - Increased Reqional Retail/Special Use Zone. This "new" alternative was discussed in the re-circulated Draft EIR. This altemative proposes to retain 51.8 acres of the area between Day Creek Boulevard and the SCE easement as Regional Related Office Commercial. Medium-High and High Density Residential uses would be integrated with commercial uses through a master planned development. Approximately 15 acres along the northern perimeter of the site adjacent to the winery, would allow residential, commercial, and community uses within a Mixed Use Zone. Areas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, currently designated Office Park would be converted to Low Medium Residential. The areas south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Loop would allow Iow intensity, "soft-retail" (Iow noise, Iow traffic commercial) uses; 19.7 acres would be converted from Low Density Residential to Low Medium Residential. This alternative would create traffic, noise, and air quality impacts at levels greater than the proposed project. Development of the 51.8 acres would generate greater impacts related to police, park, and school services. Other impacts would be the same between this alternative and the proposed project. F. Planninq Commission Workshops: During the public review period for the Draft EIR, the Planning Commission held a total of four workshops to understand and familiarize themselves with the different components of the project. These workshops serve to provide direction and guidance to the applicant and staff regarding environmental and land use and design issues within the project. Key community representatives of the Victoria and Etiwanda communities were invited to the workshops. These workshops in no case serve as a public hearing for the project. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page13 G. Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff concluded that the EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. Again, staff would like to reiterate that determining the EIR is adequate does not mean or imply support or approval of the proposed project. However, before the proposed project can be approved, a Statement of Overriding Considerations would need to be adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4 by 8 feet public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000 feet around the project site. Also, key community representatives and residents of the Victoda Planned community and Etiwanda Community have been sent notices of this pubic headng. RECOMMENDATION: Staff.recommends that the Planning Commission review the report, conduct the hearing to receive public input and conclude the public headng. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the EIR is adequate for certification and forward that recommendation to the City Council. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Draft Final EIR (document transmitted separately) Exhibit "B" - Project Area Exhibit "C" - Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Exhibit "D" - Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit "E" - Statement of Findings and Facts Exhibit "F" - Statement of Overriding Considerations Resolution Recommending the adequacy of the EIR to the City Council GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS. AND MITIGATION Exhibit "D" Table I.A- Environmental Summary of the Victoria Arbors Village Project Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.1 Land Use hnpact 4.1.1 The proposed project consisting of single family There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections Mitigated to below a level of residentialwouldbeinconflictwithsurroundingcommercialland ofthisEIR. Mhigation measures outlined in sections 4.4 (Noise) significance. uses and adjacent 1-15. The proposed project would create an and zk6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as follows: area. This incompatibility between the proposed residential am the 1-15 and planned commercial is a potentially significant Noise impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for implementation of mitigation measures in the noise and aesthetic review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units sections of the document. proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between ~ future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of the centefline of Base Line Road between ~'~ Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; '~ Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of the centefline of Church Street between futun Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue: Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and ,. Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orienta- tion, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 5120199( A :\T A B LE I_A_fa l. wpd) 1-8 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.1 (continued) Aesthetics 4.6.1C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development h'om thc view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscap- mg should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by thc future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Thc City Planning Depa~ment shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. Thc Design Review process for commercial establishment and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare ~mpects shall result from thc proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Impact 4.1.2 The proposed project conflicts with the adopted land There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections ~ Mitigated to below a level of use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public ~ significance. in the Victoria Community Plan. This incompatibility between Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit these concepts of the Victoria Lakes Village is a potentially land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant follows: level with implementation of mitigation measures in the public services and aesthetics sections of the document. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 5/20/99(A:~TABLEI_A_fnl.wpd) 1-9 , Ina Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.2 (continued) 4.5.2(1)B. At thc time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall deterr~ne whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, thc area shall be designated on thc tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Comrmssion review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. ~ 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek · Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base ~/~ Line Road south to terminate at the adult City's Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the ~ time development plans are submitted for review and for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- yard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing ~ systerm in the Etiwanda Nord~ Specific Plan , and shall connect the tesidemial areas north and south of Base Line to the regional co~al areas adjacent to Intestate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. 5120199(A:\TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1 - J. 0 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.2 (continued) Aesthetics 4.6.1C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new devclopmant from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the sarisfaction of tN City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Impact 4.1.3 The proposed project calls for the elimination of the There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections Mitigated to below a level of 19 acres of lake open space, disrupting the physical arrangement of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public significance. of the Victoria Community Plan and espocially the Victoria Lakes Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit Village. The elimination of the 19 acres of lakes and open space land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as of the adopted Victoria Village Specific Plan is a potentially !follows: significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation measures in the public Public Services services and aesthetic sections of the document. Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongn to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 5/20/99(A:~TABLE l_A_fnl, wpd) 1-1 1 Ina Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.3 (continued) 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall detelxnine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. ~'~ 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek ~ Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base j Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- yard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing wail systems in the Efiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect ~e residential areas nn~th and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. 5/20199(A:\TABLEI_A_fuLwpd) 1-12 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.3 (continued) Aesthetics 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ trails systems. 4,6.3A, Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community '% Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include \ the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied ~ allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the ~'~ viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project con'idor. 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria Pan Il of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to. hddress new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with Iow-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Impact 4.1.4 The proposed project would create a residential There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections Mitigated to below a level of "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, creating a potentially of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections, 4.3 (Air significance. significant impact, but that would be reduced to less than signifi. QualitY), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for cant level with implementation of mitigation measures, those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigation measures are as follows: 5/20/99(AATAB LE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-13 Ink Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) Air Quality 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel- powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage fi&sharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transporta- tion of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-14 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use hnpact 4.1.4 (contimmd) b. During construction, water tracks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust fi.om leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 1: miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is com- pleted, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immedi- ately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days sh~ll be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. ~,~ e. Tracks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or fi'om the site shall be tarped from the ~ point of origin. ~ Noise C~ 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street betwee~ Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boule- yard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boule- yard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orienta- tion, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 5120/99(A:WABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1 - 1 5 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) 4.6.1B. Noise wails aiong future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visuai enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on thc road side of the sound wail. ~rhis requirement shall be attached as a condition of approvai by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard Etlwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establis[ I regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park ~.~ and recreationai land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or ~ by dedication. 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreationai purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shail be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shail be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shail be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shail be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shail design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shail be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shail be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposais adjacent to "future" Day 5120199(A:~TABLEI_A_ful.wpd) 1-16 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement thc design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community flail system within the Victoria Community Plan. Aesthetics 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that thi condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare ~mpacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective reaterials are minimized. 5/20/99(A:~TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-17 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Impact 4.1.5 The proposed project would also create a "sand- There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections Mitigated to below a level of wich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections, 4.3 (Air significance. within the Victoria Community Plan, creating a potential signifi- Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aasthetics) for cant impact, but that would be reduced to less than significant thosemeasurasthatalsobenefitlandusecompatibilityoftheproject. level with implementation of mitigation measures. Those mitigation measures are as follows: Air Quality 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction ContractOr shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the (~ manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel- ~ ~owered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where ~X0 feasible. ~, 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May tlxrough October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The' Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways.. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 43.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transporta- tion of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. 5/20199(A:\TABLEI_A_fnl. wpd) 1-18 I~A Assodates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all area~ of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust flora leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. Afier clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shal~ be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees axe necessary. If' the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 5120199(AATABLE I _A_fnl.wpd) 1 - 19 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on thc east side of"future" Day Creek Boulevard shall bc 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to tern~nate at the City's adult spor~s complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by thc City at the time development plans arc submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. Thc specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Efiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas noah and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15.. 4 5 2(2)B The developer shall follow and implement the design, concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system ! within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Noise 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194 feet of the cnnterline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Efiwanda Avenue; · Within 211 feet of the cnnterline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. 5/20/99(A:\TAB LE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-20 I LLq Assxiates, Issues/Impacts Mitigut%n Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use lmpue~' 4.1.5 (continued) Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orieota- tion. building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4.4.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Comdors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Da~ Creek Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Aesthetics ~ 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in ~-),,} height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists ~ traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached ~ a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development fi-om the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the vtew corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE t _A_fnLwpd) 1-21 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commcrclal establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare ~mpacts shall result from the proposed project, Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; usc of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. I 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include ,the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. Impact 4.1.6 The proposed project would be incompatible with 4.1.6A Lots within the Victoria Arbors Village project with Mitigated to below a level of existing land uses such as the Fillipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu backwards that abut upon commercial or office/prufessional uses significance. Temple and a future regional mall, and would create potential shall be set back 60 feet from the common properly line. Homes on significant impacts. These impacts would be reduced to less than lots whose side yards abut commercial or office/profession uses shall significant level with implementation of mitigation measures, be set back 30 feet from the common property line. 4.1.6B The number of windows which look onto commercial or office/prufessional uses shall be minimized. Windows which look upon these uses shall be double paned. Window insulation shall be sufficient to ensure interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. 4.1.6C An 8-fuot slump block wall shall be constructed along the common property line which separates the residential and non- residential use. The base of the wall shall be planted with a 16-fuot wide buffer (8 feet of landscaping on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4.1.6D The CC &Rs for any residential unit abutting upon a non- residential use shall disclose the presence of the adjacent non- residential use and, to the extent possible describe the potential nuisances which might be generated by the non-residential use. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE I _A_fnl.wpd) i -22 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance ~and Use Impact 4.1.6 (¢u,,l;,,.,~d) 4.1.6E No residential or non-residential use shall generate noise, odors, or unnecessa~ light, glare or shadow beyond the property line of said use. 4.1.6F A 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear yard buffer shall be provided on the north side of Church Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Landscaping materials shall contain a variety ofspecias used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare from potential commercial uses south of Church Street The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. ! 4.2 Traffic Impact 4.2.1. Fifteen intersections are forecast to exceed the 4.2.1A. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in Mitigated to below a level of minimum LOS standards under 2015 background plus project accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee progrnm fur backbone significance. conditions in one or both peak hours. These are: infrastrncture (Transportation Department Impact Fee OrdinanceNo. i Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard 445) as the project's fair share contribution to additional circulation ~'~ Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard ~mprovements identified as necessary to maintain an acceptable level ~ Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Applicant shall Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road make a fair share contribution to traffic mitigations as determined by Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue 'the City Engineer. The additional circulation improvements shall Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street consist of the following: = Etiwanda Avenue/Ba~e Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue ° Haven AvenuefFoothill Boulevard - By 2015, the adthtion of Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard a northbound right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue ' Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the E~st Avenue/Base Line Road addition of a third eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a third westbound Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road through lane and a northbound right turn lane. 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road I-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard- By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right mm lane. Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of an eastbound fight turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. 5/20/99(A:WA BLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-23 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Traffic Impact 4.2.1 (continued) Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a northbound fight turn lane and a southbound fight turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street - By 2015, signalization. · Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Roafl - By 2015, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. · Etiwaufla Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue - By project opening, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a northbound left turn lane, a northbound fight turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, ~southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound fight turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound fight turn lane. · Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound f~ce right turn lane, and a southbound through lane. · Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opening, the addition of a northbound through By 2015, further improve- lane. merits include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third northbound through lane, a southbound through lane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. · Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a third northbound through lane and a third south- bound through lane. · East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition of a northbound left turn lane, an eastbound fight turn lane, and a westbound fight turn lane. · Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road -' By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound fight turn lane, and an eastbound right turn lane. 1-24 5/20/99(A:\TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Traffic Impact 4,2.1 (Continued) ' I'15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road. By project opening, the addition of a westbound frcc right turn lane and a second westbound left mm lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second southbound right mm lane. · I'15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound left, conversion of the northbound right turn lane to a free right turn lane and the addition of a second northbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound right turn lane and a third westbound through lane,. 4.2.1B. Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (i.e., local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and implementation of these improvements, the following mitigation measure or condition of approval is recommended: · Prior to the approval of any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic from the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. Impact 4.2.2. The proposed project will contribute to deficien- 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to the cost of Mitigated to below a level of cies along the following freeway sections: providing the following freeway lane additions: significance. SR-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue SR-30 Eastbound SR-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue LA County Line to 1-15 - addition of two lanes 1-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citms Avenue 1-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane l-I 0 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue I-15 Northbound - Jumpa Avenue to Sierra Avenue · SR-30 Westbound 1-15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue LA County line to 1-15 - addition of two lane I-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane 5/20/99(A:kTABLEI_A_fnl.wpd) 1-25 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Traffic Impact 4.2.2 (Continued) 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition of four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addition of two lanes Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addition of three lanes Milliken Avenue to I- 15 - addition of four lanes 1-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes ~. 1-10 Westbound LA County line to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes Milliken Avenue to I-15 - addition of three lanes I-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Northbound Jumpa Avenue to I- 10 - addition of one lane I~ 10 to Cherry Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jumpa Avenue - addition of one lane 4.3 Air Quality Short-term Construction-related Impacts Refer to mitigation measure 4.3.1 below. Mitigated to below a level of significance. Impact Summary: Air quality impacts may occur during the site ~reparation including grading and equipment exhaust as it is used onsite. Major sources of emissions during this phase include :xhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading and filling. NOx and PMI0 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis during construction; however, with implementation of mitigation measures impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE l_A_fnl.wpd) 1-26 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Air Quality (continued) Grading and Construction Emissions Impact 4.3.1. Peak grading and construction emissions would 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction Mitigated to below a level of exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresh- equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high significance. °Ids for thecriteriapollutantofNOx, whichis2.5 tonsperquarter energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that and PM10, which is 150 pounds per day. Emissions of other construction grading plans include a statement that all construction criteria pollutants would be below the standards. This is a equipment 'will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less- anufacturer s spec ficatmns. than-significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utiliz~ electric or diesel- powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage fidesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. 5/20/99(AATABLEI _A_fnl.wpd) 1-27 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Air Quality hnpact 4.3.1 (continued) a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or Mitigated to below a level of transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler significance. systems shall be used to provant dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust fi.om leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tavped from the point of origin. 4.3.1H The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as ~ossible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. Long-Term Regional Air Quality Impacts Impact Summary: Long-term air emission impacts are those Refer to mitigation measures 4.3.2 and 4.3.3. associated with any change in permanent usage of the project site. Stationm3, sources include any onsite emissions and emissions at the power plant associated with the electrical requirements of the project. Mobile source emissions result from vehicle trips associated with the proposed project. 1-28 5/20/99(A:~TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Impact 4.3.2. The long-term occupancy of the proposed develop- 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of the California I See below. merit of homes and retail commercial uses would consume natura Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission gas and electricity. On-site stationary sources (i.e., energy regardingenergyconservationstandards. Theprojectapplicantshall consumption) emissions would be below the emission thresholds Incorporate the following in ballding plans: established by thc South Coast Air Quality Management District except for NOx emissions. This is a significant long-term impact · Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; of the proposed project. Solar or low-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; Refrigerator with vacuum power insalatisn; Douhie-palned glass or window treatment for energy ('~ conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and ~ Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. '4~. Impact 4.3.3, Vehicular trips associated with the proposed 14.3.3A. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as Operational emissions of the proposed ~ project would produce emissions that would exceed the South preferential parking for vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy for transit project would result in total emissions of Coast Air Quality Management District dally thresholds for the Passorvanpoollng/carpooling, flextime work schedule, hikeracks 2,0341bs./dayofCO, 1531bs./day of criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx. This is a significant lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the ROC, 326 lbs./day of NOx, 36 lbs./day of impact. Even after implementation of the mitigation measures design of the commercial land uses. SOx, and 47 lbs./day of PM~0. Emission identified, it is not guaranteed that the emissions would be levels of CO, ROC, and NOx would ex- reduced to below the thresholds. Therefore, it would remain a 4.3.3B. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the ceed the SCAQMD threshold for long- significant impact, electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical term operations. Even after implementa- charges for EV cars and/or optic-fibers for home offices. If feasible tion the mitigation measures identi fled, it install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's is not guaran teed that the emissions direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. would be reduced to below the thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on air qual- 4.3.3C. Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) ity during daily operations would remain for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s) significant and the City must adopt a such as park and ride lots, Metrolink stations, and commercial Statement of Overriding Considerations. centers. 4.3.3.D. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. 4.3.3.E. The developer shall install trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 5120/99(A:\TABLEI_A_fnl.wpd) ! -29 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.4 Noise Impact 4.4.1: Noise levels fi.om grading and other construction 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the Mitigated to below a level of activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA at the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or significance. closest residences to the northeast of the project site north of Base mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent, Line Road or to the east of Etiwanda Avenue for very limited with manufacturers standards. times when construction occurs near them. Construction-related noise impacts would be potentially significant; however, with 4.4.1B. Theprojectcontractorshallplaceallstadonaryconstruction implementation of mitigation measures identified, the impact equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive would be reduced to less than significant, receptors to the east of the site. 4.4.1C. The construction contractor shall locate ~quipment staging tn areas that wilt create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction~ 4.4.1D. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 ~.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and mblic holidays. Impact4.4.2: Increasesinnoisclevelscouldresultfrompruject- 4.4.2. Noise studias shall be required to be submitted to the City for Mitigated to below a level of related traffic on access roads leading to the project alte. Project- reviewandapprovalpriortofinalmapapprovalforrasidentialunits significance. related long-term vehicular trip increases would be 45,487 dally, proposed within the following areas: The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than 2 dBA, exceptalongChurchStreetbetwcenRochesterAvanueand · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard, where the increase would be 4.7 future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; dBA but no sensitive uses exist currently. No significant traffic · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between noise impacts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; proposed on-site residential uses would potentially be exposed to · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between traffic noise levels exceeding the 60 dBA Ldn standard Rochaster Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; recommendedforresidentialuses. Implementationofmitigation ° Within194feetofthccenterlineofChurchStreetbetweenfuture measures would be required to reduce such an impact to less than Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; significant. ° Within211 feetofthecenterlineoffutureDayCreekBoulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard, 1-30 5/20/99(A:\TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Noise (continued) Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or ., mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4.5 Public Services Schools Impact 4.5.1. As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms 4.5.1A. The developer shall be required to execute an agreement Mitigated to below a level of °fthe Etiwanda and Chaffey School Districts, bothdistricts have with Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Unified High School significance. urged and continue to urge the City not to approve development District to provide adequate mitigation. Such an ~.greement shall b~ applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve executed Prior to Planning Commission approval for any residential the developmentproject. Future developmentwillganeratemore project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actua students for the already impacted school districts and is implementation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedication considered significant. Schoolmitigation plans wouldbeenacted of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permits are ~ between the Etiwanda School District/Chaffey Joint Union High obtained. School District and the project developer providing for a per dwellingunitfeeratefortheresidentialportionoftheprojectsite. 4.5.1B. In the event that the developer declines to execute a Implementation of this mitigation would ~duce impacts on mitigation agreement, the City shall require full mitigation as a schools to a less-than-significant level, condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities district for school facilities. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some oftbe special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Parks and Recreation hnpact4.5.2(l). Theresidentialportionoftheproposedproject 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be anbject to Ordinance No. 105set Mitigated to below a level of would increase the demand for active recreation facilities within by the City Council oftbe City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish significance, the Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. For regulationsfordedicationofland, paymentoffees, orboth, forpark the Victoria Community Plan area, the proposed project must and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The provide 18.43 acres of parkland, and for the Etiwanda Specific developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland either by fee or Plan, an additional 2.25 antes for a total of 20.68 acres of parkland by dedication. 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI_A_fnI.wpd) 1-31 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Public Services, Parks & Recreation Impact 4.5.2(1) (continued) is required for the proposed project. Currently, the proposed 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor project has only provided for a total of 8.62 acres of active subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation recreationalfacilitiescausingadeficiencyof20.68acresofactive Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for recreation which is a significant impact to park facilities. To 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are mitigate this shortage of active recreation, future development necessary. IftheCitydesimsdedication, theareashallbedesignated proposalsmustprovideadditionalacreagetomeettherecmational on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan needs of this community. Implementation of the mitigation will amendment indicating the location of any park ahall be processed reduce impacts on parks to a less-than-significant level, subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parks and dedication or fee. Impact 4.5.2(2). The residential and commercial areas proposed 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "futura" Day Creek Mitigated to below a level of significance. would increase the demand for active recreational facilities Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. To mitigate Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. the potential impacts to trails and to also implement the City's Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the Master Plan of Trails, future development proposals must provide time development plans are submitted for review and approval for additional acreage for trails to meet the need within the City. any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Implementation of the mitigation to provide trails per the City's Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Master Plan of Trails will reduce impacts on trail systems and Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to recreation to less -than-significant levels, connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Intemate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system, within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. 5/20/99(A:~TABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-32 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance police Impact 4.5.3. The proposed project will result in a potentially 4.$.3A. As stated in the General Requirements and Approvals for Mitigated to below a level of significance. significant impact as an increase in demand for police services, the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver An additional five police personnel would be required for the form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities proposed residantial and commemial development. Mitigation of District shall be filed with City Engineering prior to final map this impact would require that the City exact fees bom the approval or the issuance of building permits, whicheveroccurs first developer through an existing assessment district or form one to for any projects within the project area between Base Line Road and gain the necessary funds for the additional police personnel 1-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. needed. Fir~e Impact 4.5.4. Impacts of the proposed project on fire service for 4.5.4A. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community Mitigated to below a level of significance. the City of Rancho Cucamonga are potentially significant. Bosed Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. on the standard response time threshold of five minutes, and the project's location relative to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is 4.5.4B. The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler systems anticipated to fall within the five-minute response time criteria, in commercial, industrial, and multi-faxmly residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual Impact 4.6.1. The proposed project would replace 19 acres of 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Mitigated to below a level of significance. lakes and open space, for increased residential and commercial Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in uses, causing a substantial loss of planned open space. This height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists would significantly alter existing and future public views and traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this view corridors. This is a significant impact, but would be reduced condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan to a less-than-significant level with implementation of mitigation amendments. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI_A_fnI.wpd) 1-33 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of thc project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the axea of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner, Impact 4.6.2. New light and glare would be created by the 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments Mitigated to below a level of significance. addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare previously proposed as a utility co~idor. The most significant impacts shall result fi.om the proposed project. Specific issues to be glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end :valuated at the time of design review shall include the following: of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking ~roposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to that may be lit at night and that would be visible from roadways reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; usc of shielding on such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. minimized. This is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic measures, benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commemial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, ~ublic art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ trails systems. Impact 4.6.3. Thc project could conflict with policies of the 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of Mitigated to below a level of City's General Plan Community Design Element and recommen- viewshcdsandplantpaletteplansshownintheVictoriaCommunity significance. dations found in the Victoria Community Plan. This is a porch- Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard tially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less-than- Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include significant level with implementation of mitigation reeasures, the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 1-34 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 _A_fnl.wpd) Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be implemented. 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria Part 1I of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along ~e site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west COlXidors, the City shall designate meas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. 4.7 Biological Resources Impact 4.7.1 The proposed project would result in the loss of No mitigation is required. )otential habitat for rare, threatened, or endangered species, however, no rare threatened, or endangered species were detected on the site. The loss of potential, but unoccupied, habitat for such species is not considered to be a significant impact and no mitigation is required, Impact 4.7.2 The proposed project would interfere with local No mitigation'is required. wildlife movement patterns, this is not considered to be a signifi- cant impact and no mitigation is required, Impact4.7.3 The proposed project would substantially diminish 4-7.3A Minimize the amount ofcoastal sage scrub hist as the result Mitigated to below a level ofsignificance habitat for wildlife or plants; this impact is considered to be of devehipment (i.e., preserve the majority of the habitat on site) significant, through project and construction redesign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those areas of coastal sage scrab impacted. 5/20199(A:WABLEI_A_fnl. wpd) 1-35 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.7 Biological Resources (Continued) 4.7.3B Restore (to ensure no-net-loss of acreage and quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these habitats from elsewhere on site. 4.7.3C Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team Arundo) to ~rovide compensation for the loss of 0.4 acre of mixed willow series. 4.7.3D Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to )rovide substitute resources for the coastal sage scrub that would be lost tluough project construction. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location tffat would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoining thc North Etiwanda Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on thc project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Impact 4.7.4 The proposed project proposes to acre mitigation 0.97 No is of wetland on site. The retention may have a significant impact on the City's ability to maintain the wetland and could increase the presence of vectors. Impact4.7.STheproposedprojectproposestoretain0.97acreof 4.7.SAIftheCitydesirastoaliminatetheretentionofthewetlandon Mitigated to below a level of significance. wetland on site, The retention may have a significant impact on site, an individual 404 permit shall be obtained from the Corps by the City's ability to improve or divert flows in the drainage the applicant. MitigationrequiredbytheCorpsmayincludecmation system north of the proposed project area. or enhancement of off-site wetland habitat at a ratio of at least 1:1 and as high ~s 3:1 (i.e., 3 acres created for each acre impacted). Provisions of the permit shall be adhered to prior to the issuance of grading permits for the area which contains the wetland. 4.8 Cultural Resources Impact 4.8.1. The potential for historic human burials and/or 4.8.1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course Mitigated to below a level of cultural materials may be present in the project area. This is a of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find significance. >otentially significant impact but would be reduced to a level hould be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be below significance with implementation of Mitigation Measure evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. 4.8.1. If human rearalns are encountered, the San Bemardino County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours. If the coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but prehistoric,, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendent (MLD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial. 1-36 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 _A_fnl.wpd) GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP) Exhibit "E" APPENDIX G MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN This mitigation monitoring plan has been prepared for use in implementing mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Arbors Vil- lage project. This program has been prepared in compliance with the State law to ensure compliance with mitigation measures adopted for the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code, Paragraph 201081.6), effective January 1, 1989, requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those conditions of approval placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some in- stances, one action, such as plan review, may be used to verify ~mplementation of several conditions of approval. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based on recommenda- tions by those responsible for the program. If changes are made, new monitor- ing compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VtCTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE I I l ~ Mitigation Measures Reporting Process ~ Party Initials ~D USE Remar~ There are mitigation measures ~lated to land use in other Refer to individual Refer to individual Pl~ning Dept. sections of ~is EIR. Refer to mitigation measures out- Monitoring and Report- Milestones for Imple- . lined in sections 4.2 (Traffic), 4.3 (Air Quali~), 4.4 ing Processes Mitiga- mentation of Mitiga- (Noise), 4.5 (Public So,ices), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for tion Measures under: tion Measures under: those measures that also benefit land use compatibili~ of ~he proj~t. F~ffic Air QualiW Air Quali~ Noise Noise Public Se~ices Public Se~ices Aesthetics Aesthetics [.I.6A Lo~ within thc Victoda Arbo~ Village project The developer sha{[ P~or to the issuance Planning Dept. with bac~ards that abut upon co~crcial or of- submit to thc Ci~ for of building ~iB. rice/professional uses shall be set back 60 feet from the ~eview and approval co--on propc~ line. Homes on lots whose side yards firing plans for those abut co~crcial or office/profession uses shall bc set homes ~at will abut Building Dept. back 30 feet from the co--on propc~ line. co~ercial ancot of- rice professional exist- ing and pla~ed uses. EIR~IITMON,FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks 4.1.6B The number of windows which look onto com- Thc developer shall sub- Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. mercial or office/professional uses shall be minimized, mit to the City for re- building permits for Windows which look upon these uses shall bc double view and approval residential lots that paned. Window insulation shall bc sufficient to ensure building plans that mini- abut commercial interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. mizc windows for those and/or office eom- residential units that mercial zoned areas. Building Dept. look onto conunemial and/or office profes- sional existing and ~tanned uses. LAND USE (Continued) 4.L6C An 8-foot slump block wall shall be constructed The developer shall Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. along the common property line which separates the resi- I submit to the City for building permits for dential and non-residential use. The base of the wall shall I review and approval residential lots that be planted with a 16-foot wide buffer (8 feet of landscap- I landscaping and build- abut commercial ing on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall lng plans for those resi- and/or office com- be reviewed and approved by the Planning D rector, dent a un ts that abut memial zoned areas. ~commercial and/or of- fice professional exist- ing and planned uses. 4.1.6D The CC &Rs for any residential unit abutting The developer shall sub- Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. upon a non-residential use shall disclose the presence of mit to the City a copy of the first certificate of the adjacent non-residential use and, to the extent possible the CC &Rs for all resi- occupancy for any describe the potential nuisances which might be generated :lential development that residential unit for by the non-residential use. ibuts existing and any tract that abuts alanned non-residential existing and planned ases. non-residential land USES. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-3 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks I.I.6E No residential or non-residential use shall gener. The applicant shall sub~ Priorto of building Planning Dept. ate noise, odors, or unnecessary light, glare or shadow mit a lighting plan for ~errnits for any eom- beyond the property line of said use. any commercial build- meroial building. lng. 4.1.6F A 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear The applicant shall sub- Prior to issuance of Planning 1Sept. yard buffer shall be provided on the noHh side ofChurch rnit to the City for re. buildingpermitsfor Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Day Creek Boule- view and approval a any unit north of vard. Landscaping materials shall contain a variety of landscaping plan for Church Street be- species used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare areas that will require a tween Etiwanda Ave. from potential commercial uses south of Church Street 20- to 25-foot rear yard nue and Day Creek Engineering The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by buffer. Boulevard. the Planning Director. Dept. TRAFFIC ~ ~ ~ ~ 4/28~RG83 I\Finall EIR\MITMON.FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks ~.2.1A. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic Payment of traffic fees Applicant shall make City Engineer ['cc in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee pro- to the City by thc devel- a fair share contfibu- ram for backbone infrastructure (Transportation Depart- oper. tion to traffic ~nent Impact Fcc Ordinance No. 445) as the project's fair mitigations as deter- 5hare contribution to additional circulation improvements mined by thc City identified as necessary to maintain an acceptable level of Engineer. service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Appli- :ant shall make a fair share contribution to traffic ~nitigations as determined by the City Engineer. These ~dditional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: 1. Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right mm lane. 2. Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By pro- ject opening, the addition of a third eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a third westbound through lane and a northbound right tarn lane. 3. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a west- bound free right turn lane. 4. Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road - By pro- ject opening, the addition of an eastbound fight turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. 5. Etlwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, thc addition of a northbound right turn lane and a southbound fight turn lane. 6. EIiwanda AvenueNIctorla Street - By 2015, signalization. 4/28/99(R:\CRG831\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-'-, MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FtNAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party lnltlal~ Date TRAFFIC (Continued) Remarks 7. Etlwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - By 201 $, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. 8. Etiwandn Avenue/Church Street-Miller Ave- nue - By project opening, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition ora northbound left turn lane, a north- bound right turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound right mm lane. ~. Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound free fight turn lane, and a south- bound through lane. 10. Etlw~nda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opemng, the addition ora northbound through lane. By 2015, funbor improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third northbound through lane, a southbound through Fane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. 11. Etlwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, thc addition of a third northbound through lane and a third southbound through lane. 12. East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition ora northbound left turn lane, an east- bound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. _EIR\MITMON.FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Reromrks TRAFFIC (Continued) 13. Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound let~ turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound right tum lane, and an eastbound right tarn lane. 14. !-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition ora westbound free right tam lane and a second westbound left tam lane. By 2015, further improvements in- clude the addition of a second southbound right tam lane. 15. 1-15 Norlhbound Ramps/Base Line Road - B' project opening, the addition of a second east- bound left, .~,i.~ ;1(,, conversion of the north- bound right tam lane to a free right tam lane and the addition of a second northbound left tam lane. By 2015, further improvements in- clude the addition ora second northbound right tam lane and a third westbound through lane. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-7 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date FRAFFIC (Continued) Remarks 4.2.1B. Circulation improvements have been identified to A traffic study shall be Prior to the approval Engineering achieve standards levels of service (i.e., local jurisdiction prepared by the devel- of any tract map. Dept. and/or SANBAG} at study area intersections. To address opcr and submitted to the timing, funding, and implementation of these ira- the City for review and ~rovements, the following mitigation measure or condi- approval. tion of approval is recommended: Prior to the approval of any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether [ the incremental increase in traffic from the tract \,,_~ map area causes any of the intersect ons under investigation to result in unsatisfactory leve s of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, I~...~ this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to rhe developer shall Prior to approval of Engineering the cost of providing the following freeway lane addi- provide evidence to the Final Tract Map. tions: Dept. City of compliance with the Congestion Manage- SR-30 Eastbound ment Agency. LA County Line to 1-15 - addition of two lanes l- 15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane SR-30 Westbound LA County line to 1-15 - addition of two lane I- 15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane _EIR\MITMON.FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL [MPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks TRAFFIC (Continued) 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition of four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addi- tion of two lanes Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addi- tion of three lanes Milliken Avenue to I-15 - addition of four lanes I-I 5 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-10 Westbound LA County line to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes Milliken Avenue to I-15 - addition of three lanes 1-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes - 1-15 Northbound Jurupa Avenue to I-I 0 - addition of one lane bi0 to Cherry Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jurupa Avenue - addition of one lane 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-9 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks AIR QUALITY 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the con- Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & ~tmction equipment used onsitc based on low emission to thc City proof that the Safety Dept. factom and high energy efficiency. The Construction mitigation listed is in- grading permits. Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans eluded in the construe- include a statement that all construction equipment will be tion documents with the tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufac- developer's contractor. Applicant shall turer's specifications, pay for mitiga- f~ tion monitor ~ hired by City. ('~ 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & ~) or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. engines where feasible, mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Applicant shall tion documents with the pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & construction grading plans include a statement that work to the City proof that th{ grading permits. Safety Dept. crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During mitigation listed is in- smog season (May through October), the overall length of eluded in thc construe- Applicant shall the construction per/od should be extended, thereby de- tion documents with the pay for mitiga- creasing the size of the ama prepared each day, to mini- developer's contractor, tion monitor mize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. hired by City. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the con- struction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be re- mitigation listed is in- rained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways, eluded in the construe- Applicant shall tion documents with the pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. EIR\MITMON.FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL lMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Renmrks AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3,1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the con- to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dcpt, struction crew. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Applicantshall tion documents with the pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. 4.3.1F. The dcveloper shall install bicycle trails per the Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. City's General Bikeways Plan. to the City for review any grading permits. and approval a bicycle trails plan. Planning Dept. Field inspections dur- ing grading. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by fol- lowing the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earthmovlng, excavation, Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building& or transportation of cut or fill materials, water to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent mitigation listed is in- dust from leaving the site and to create a crast after eluded in the construe- each day's activities cease, tion documents with the developer's contractor. 4/28/99{R:\CRG831 ~FinalI_EIR\MITMON,FIN) G- 11 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date AIR QUALITY (Continued) Remarks b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler sys- Applicant shall submit Field inspections dur- Applicant shall terns shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle to the City proof that the lng grading, pay for mitiga- movement damp enough to prevent dust from leav- mitigation listed is in- lion monitor lng the site. At a minimum, this would include cluded in the construe- hired by City. wetting down such areas in thc later morning and lion documents with the after work is completed for the day, and whenever developer's contractor. Prior to issuance of Building & wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. grading permits. Safety Dept. ~ Field inspections dur- Applicant shall  ing grading, pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or cxcava- Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & tion is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil mitigation listed is in- until the area is paved or otherwise developed so cluded in the construe- Field inspections dur. Applicant shall that dust generation will not occur, tion documents with the ing grading, pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to to thc City proof that thl grading permits. Safety Dept. prevent dust generation, mitigation listed is in- eluded in the construe- Field inspections dur- Applicant shall lion documents with the lng grading, pay for mitiga- :ieveloper's contractor, lion monitor hired by City. EIR~MITMON. FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks AIR QUALITY (Continued) e. Tracks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & and/or construction debris to or from thc site shall to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. be tatpcd from the point of origin, mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- Field inspections dur- Applicant shall tion documents with the ing grading, pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. 4.3.1H The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, to the City proof that the building permits. Safety Dept. ~vater-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or mitigation listed is in- spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as eluded in the construe- high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or man- tion documents with the aal coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, developer's contractor. trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of the Cal- iforaia Code of Regulations established by the Energy Applicant shall prepare Prior to issuance of Building & Commission regarding energy conservation standards, and submit building building permits. Safety Dept. The project applicant shall incorporate the following in dans and landscaping building plans: ~lans to the City for re- view and approval that City's Engineer- Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to contain the listed mitiga- ing Dept. building; tion. Solar or Iow-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation; Double-pained glass or window treatment for energy conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. 4/28/99(RSCRG831\FinaH_E1R\MITMON.FIN) G-13 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3.3A. Usc of transportation demand measures (TDM) The applicant shall pre- Prior to issuance of Building & such as preferential parking for van pooling/car pooling, ~are and submit to the building permits. Safety Dept. subsidy for transit pass or van pooling/car pooling, flex- Eity for review and ap- time work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and ,royal development Planning I~cpt. onsitc cafeteria shal~ be incorporated in the design of the )lans that incorporate commercial land uses. the listed TDM mca- SUreS, (~ 4.3.4B. The project proponent shall determine with the The applicant shall sub- Prior to issuance of a Planning Dept. City and thc c ectrical purveyor ~f it is feasib c to pre-wire mit to the City written certificate of occu- \ houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fi- evidence that he/she has pancy. ~ bers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges consulted with the elee- ~'~ and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction trical purveyor and the ~rior to Certificate of Occupancy. City. 4.3.4C. Install EV charges or electrical fuel sta- The developer shall pre- Prior to issuance of Building & tions/natural gas for community wide use at key commer- ,are and submit to the building permits for Safety Dept. cial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, City for review and ap- any commercial Metrolink Station, and commercial centers. ,royal building plans ~uilding. that incorporate the miti- ation. Field inspections Building & )riot to issuance ora Safety Dept. certificate of occu- pancy. Planning Dept. 4.3.4D. The developer shall contract with a mitigation The developer shall Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. monitor to assure compliance and implementation with submit to the City evi- grading permits. ~he mitigation monitoring program. &nee that the developer has contracted with a mitigation monitor to Implement the mitiga- tion monitoring pro- [ram. MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks NOISE 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on- Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & site, the project contractors shall equip all construction to the City proof that the ~rading permits. Safety Dept. equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and mitigation listed is in- maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers eluded in the construe- Applicant'shall standards, tion documents with the pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. 4.4.1B. The project contractor shall place all stationary Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Field inspections dur- ion documents with the lng grading. Building & developer's contractor. Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. 4.4.1C. The construction contractor shall locate equip- Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & ment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. between construction-related noise sources and noise sen- mitigation listed is in- sitive receptors to the east of the site during all project eluded in the construe- Applicant shall construction, tion documents with the .pay for mitiga- developer's contractor, tion monitor hired by City. 4.4.1D. During all project site construction, the construe- Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Prior to issuance tion contractor shall limit all construction-related activi- to the City proof that the grading permits, r)f grading per- ties that would result in high noise levels to between the mitigation listed is in- mits. hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Satur- eluded in the construe- day, unless such construction activities do not result in tion documents with the Applicant shall noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of developer's contractor, pay for mitiga- the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and tion monitor public holidays, hired by City. 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITM ON. FIN ) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date NOISE (Continued) Remarks 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to bc submitted to The applicant shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. the City for review and approval prior to final map ap- mit noise studies to the Final Tract Map. ~roval for residential units proposed within the following City for review and ap- areas: Applican~hall ,royal for residential pay for mitiga- anits within the listed lion monitor Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road be. areas. tween future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park hired by City. Lane; Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road be- tween Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Chureh Street be- tween Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boule- yard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street be- tween furore Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Ave- nue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boule- vard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation _s~all be provided. MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks PUBLIC SERVICES Schools 4.5.1A. Thc developer shall be required to execute an The developer shall sub- Prior to thc issuance Building & agreement with Etiwanda School District and Chaffey mit to the City a copy of of building permits Safety Dept. Unified High School District to provide adequate mitiga- t school mitigation plan for any residential tion. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Plan- executed between the unit. ning Commission approval for any residential project developer and thc within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual imple- Etiwanda School Dis- ~ mentation of thc agreement by payment the of fees, dcdi- tricL cation of sites or other mitigation will take place as build- ~ lng permits are obtained. ~ Thc developer shall sub- Prior to the issuance Building& mit to the City a copy of of building permits ~afcty Dept. ~,~ a school mitigation plan for any residential executed between the unit. developer and the Chaffey Unified High School District. 4.5.1B. In the event that the developer declines to execute If a mitigation agree- Prior to Planning Planning Dept. a mitigation agreement, the City shall require full mitiga- ment is not executed, the Commission ap- lion as a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be :leveloper shall form a ~roval for any resi- aecomplishedbymeansofarequirementtuformaMello- Mello-RoosCommunity Jentialunit. Roos Community Facilities district for school facilities. Facilities District. n order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G- 17 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ]MPAGT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigatlgn Measures Reporting Process Milestones Pa~ ty Initials Date Remarks Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance The developer shall exe- Prior to approva~ of Planning Dept. No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho cute an agreement with the Final Tract Map. Uucamnnga to estabhsh regulat nns for dedication of land, the City to dedicate payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land ir )arkland or pay in lieu subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is fees as determined by Parks & Recre- responsible for 24.76 acres of parkland either by fee or by the City's Park and Rec. ation Dept. dedication, reation Commission. 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a The City Park and Rec- At the time of filing a Parks & Recre- minor subdivision plat for approval, thc City Park and reation Commission ~entative tract map or ation Dept. ~ Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedica- ~hall determine whether ~ minor subdivision ~,, lion of property for 24.76 acres of park and recreationa~ dedication of pmperty plat for approval· purposes or in lieu of fees arc necessary. If the City dc- for 24.76 acres of park ('~ ~ires dedication, the area shall be designated on thc tenta- and recreational pur- :~ve tract map when submitted and a General Plan amend- ~oses or in lieu of fees merit indicating the location of any park shall be pro- are necessary. cessed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. The developer shall sub-· At the time of filing ~ Planning Dept. m~t an application for a tentative tract map or General Plan Amend- a minor subdivision ment for the location of plat for approval. any park. 4.$.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it the developer shall el- Prior to issuance of Building & shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions ~h ' ' · er execute a dedication building permits. Safety Dept. of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the agreement with the City game shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance or pay established fees. 3f building permits. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. RG83 I\FinaII_EIR\MITMON.FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks PUBLIC SERVICES (Continued) 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of"future" Day The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. Creek Boulevard shall be widened by 20 to 25 feet to mit to the City for re- any development ~rovide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to view and approval a plans adjacent to Da Parks & Recre- terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific trails plan fur the park- Creek Boulevard. ttionDept. design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the way on the east side of time development plans are submitted for review and Day Creek Boulevard approval for any development proposals adjacent to "Pa- incorporating the stated ture" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie mitigation. ff'~ in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan de- sign. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned · and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adja- ~ cent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and corn- mit for review and ap- any development munity trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. ~roval a detailed design, dans. Parks & Recre- and trails plan in accor: ation Dept. dance with the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. within the proposed project's linear park system connect- mit for review and ap- any development ing existing trails to the regional center within the Victo- ~roval the trails plan for flans. ria Community Plan area. the project in accor- dance with the Victoria Parks & Recre- Community Plan. ation Dept. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR~MITMON.F[N) G- 19 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Police Remarks 4.5.3A. As stated in the General Requirements and Ap- l'he developer shall sign Prior to final map Engineering ,rovals for the Police Department for the City, a signed a consent and waiver approval within the Dept. consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law En- form to join and/or form project area between foreement Community Facilities District shall be filed the Law Enforcement Base Line Road & I- ~vith City Engineering prior to final map approva or the Community Facilities 15. ~ssuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for District. A copy of the any projects within the project area between Base Line signed form shall be Road and I- 15. Formation costs shall be borne by the de- submitted to the City's ~ veloper. Engineering Depart- I mont. ~,~ Fir__g ~ 4.5.4A. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Corn- The developer shall join Prior to issuance of Fire Dept. rnunity Facilities District to provide fire protection set- a Mello-Roos Commu- building permits. vices to the site. mty Facilities District for fire protection. Building & Safety Dept. 4.5.4B. The developer shall install automated fire sprin- The developer shall Prior to issuance of Fire Dept. kler systems in commercial, industrial, and multi-family submit to the City for building permits. residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga review and approval Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho ~uilding plans that in- Building & Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. elude automated fire sprinkler systems, gafety Dept. AESTHETIC/VISUAL ~ ~ ~ L6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted mit to the City for re- any development to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the view and approval de- ,lans for structures mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Plan- velopment plans for ~vithin 100 feet from ning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied structures within 100 Day Creek Boule- Building & ~rior to building plan approvals, feet from Day Creek yard. Safety Dept. Boulevard MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more mit to the City for re- any development than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for view and approval de- bordering future Day these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adc- velopment plans for Creek Boulevard., quate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the noise walls along Day Etiwanda Avenue sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a con- Creek Boulevard. and Church Street. dition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4.6. lC. Landscape requirements shall be established for The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of City Planner the far southem end of the project site to screen new de- mit to the City for re- any development velopment from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking view and approval land- dans for develop- north. However, this landscaping should also allow views scape plans for any de- ment adjacent and in City Engineer north towards the mountains, using the view corridor pro- velopment in the area of the vicinity of 1-15. vided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda 1-15. Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such Parks & Recre- landscaping as a condition of approval for any develop- ation Dept. merit in the area ofl-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review pmcess for commercial es- The developer shall sub- Prior to development Planning Dept. tablishments and public places shall ensure that no signifi- mit to the City for re- plan approval by the cant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed view and approval de- City's Design Re- ,roject. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of de- velopment plans that view Committee. sign review shall include the following: proposed exterior indicate the type and lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible location of exterior lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exte- lighting. riot lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed amhitectuml materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinaII_EIRWIITMON.FIN) G-21 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept. aesthetic benefit of thc lakes by providing a new focal mit for review and ap- development plans point concept within residential area to be submitted for provat by the City's De- b ' ' y the C ty s Design Design Review, The focal point concept could include an sign Review Committee Review Committee. open space trail system linkage to thc winery site and a new focal point con- commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, cept within thc residen- and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, tim area. public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ ('~ trails systems. "~ 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protec- The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of Planning Dept,  tion of view sheds and plant palette plans shown in thc mit to the City for re- development plans Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along view and approval land- b ' ' ' y the C~ty s Design future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and scape plans for major Review Committee. Church Street. Such provisions may include the follow- intersections along Day ing: building setbacks within the project site; varied al- Creek Boulevard, Vieto- [owable heights with lower heights nearest thc inter- ria Park Lane, and :hanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to corn- Church Street. plement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at thc time of developing condi- tions of approval for any projects within thc proposed pro- ect corridor. 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the implement mitigation Prior to issuance of Planning Dept, City's Community Design Element, recommended mitiga- ~tnder 4.6.1 building permits. tion measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be imple- mented. EIR~IITMON. FIN) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the The City shall amend Prior to approval of Planning Dept. Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately the Community Design tentative tract map. following project approval to address new uses proposed Criteria Part II of the as part of the project. However, as part of this amend- Victoria Community ment, some requirements shall be included to reduce vi- Plan per the stated miti- sual impacts of new development by inclusion of land- gation. scaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and a ong roadways to screen new ~levclopmcnt from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is lanted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree ~f visual open space on the project site. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ¢.7.3A Minimize the amount of coastal sage scrub lost as Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. ~.he result of development (i.e., preserve the majority of development plans to grading permits. ~he habitat on site) through project and construction rede- the City that preserve sign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those coastal sage scrub areas of coastal sage scrub impacted, onsite. OR Applicant shall submit to the City proof that participation in an off- site mitigation bank is or will occur. 4/28/99(R:\CRG831\Finall_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G~23 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible ~ ~ Mitigation Measures Report'ng Process Milestones Party Remarks BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Continued) ~ ~ . ~ Applicant shall have a ~ restoration plan pre- aared by a qualified res- toration biologist and submitted to the City for review and approval. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of 1..7.3B Restore (to ensure no-net-loss of acreage and to the City proof that last Certificate of alarming Dept. \ quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or participation in an off- Occupancy on the abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these site mitigation bank is or last residential unit. 'x",,3 habitats from elsewhere on site. will occur. Applicant shall submit ?flor to issuance of to the City proof that grading permits. Planning Dept. 4.7.3C Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team aarticipation in an off- Amndo) to provide compensation for the loss of 0.4 acre site mitigation bank is or of mixed willow series, will occur. Prior to issuance of 1.7.3D Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site last Certificate of ?lanning Dept. lands to provide substitute resources for the coastal sage Occupancy on the scrub that would be lost through project construction, last residential unit. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location that would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoining the North Etiwanda Prior to issuance of Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on the last Certificate of Planning Dept. project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Occupancy on the last residential unit. MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date Remarks BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Continued) 4.7.5A If the City desires to eliminate the retention of the The applicant shall ap- Prior to issuance of Building Dept. ~vetland on site, an individual 404 permit shall bc ob- ply for an individual 404 any grading permits rained from the Corps by thc applicant. Mitigation re- ~ermit for the U.S. for the area contain- ~luired by the Coups may include creation or enhancement Army Co~ps of Engi- mg the wetland. ~f off-site wetland habitat at a ratio of at least 1:1 and as neers. A copy of the high as 3:1 (Lc., 3 acres created for each acre impacted), executed permit shall be Planning Dept. Provisions of the permit shall be adhered to prior to the submitted to the City for issuance of grading permits for the area which contains its files. the wetland. CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.8.1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during The applicant shall pm- Prior to issuance of Building Dept. the course of the project, ground disturbing activities in vide evidence that the any grading permit. the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the ha- language in the mitiga- tare and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified tion has been incorpo- Planning Dept. archaeologist, rated in the contractor's construction plans. If human remains are encountered, the San Beruardino County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours. If the coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but pre- historic, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendent (MLD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinaII_EIR~IITMON.FIN) G-25 GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 STATEMENTS OF FACTS AND FINDINGS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Exhibit "F" C ~'7~ Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Effects from the Victoria Arbors Village (GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01) (SCH #98041137) I. INTRODUCTION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("this Council") in approving the Victoria Arbors Village project, makes the findings described below and adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations presented at the end of the Findings. The "project" under CEQA for purposes of the City's discretionary action is the approval of the Victoria Arbors Village project. The prior project was identified as the Victoria Arbors Village. This Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse Number (SCI-I) 98041137 (the "1999 Final EIR") on July 7, 1999 but did not approve the project or adopt thc findings and statement of overriding considerations. The'Victoria Arbors Village is a modification to a project previously analyzed in the 1999 Final EIR. On 2000, the Council approved an addendum to the 1999 Final EIR. Because the City did not approve the Victoria Arbors Village project, no change in on-site zoning occmred. Zoning for the project site is that which existed prior to preparation of the Final EIR. Subsequent to the 1999 certification of the Final EIR, an application was made to the City for an amendment to the City's General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Etiwanda Specific Plan to reflect requested changes in land use designations from residential and regional retail uses to mixed uses. Although the proposed project includes the rezoning of property from residential and regional commercial uses to a "mixed use" designation, the City has established underlying land uses which will guide development within the limits of the project site. These Findings are based upon the entire record before this Council, including the Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") prepared for the Project and the addendum ("Addendum") which augments the 1999 Final EIR for the Project. The EIR were prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). II PROJECT SUMMARY A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of approximately 291.71 acres. Of the total, the applicant, American Beauty Development Corporation, has proposed multiple land use amendments to approximately 232.8 acres within the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In addition, amendments to the circulation and open space elements of the Victoria Community Plan would be required. The proposed land use amendments would result in the conversion of 64.3 acres of multifamily to single family residential; 58.76 acres of regional related office commercial to single family residential, medium density residential and high density residential; 18.74 acres of open space and lakes to Mixed Use in the Victoria Community Plan area Approximately 26 acres of office/professional is proposed to be converted to Mixed Use in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This 26 acres within the Etiwanda Specific Plan is proposed 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKI4\FINDINGS#2.WPD) I to be annexed into te Victoria Community Plan area as a result of the approval of the Victoria Arbors Village project. B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES · To provide a compact, inwardly-oriented community thematically tied to the historic winery and viticulture. · To provide housing types and locations that is conducive to the family orientation of the village. · To provide a mix of housing types oriented around a centrally located neighborhood school and park. · To provide regional and village-scale trails and walkways with linear parks that will link the village to the adjoining comr0unity and commercial facilities to the south. · To provide enhanced open space features and resting places to reinforce the village's connection to the regional trail system and adjoining uses. · To restore a wetland area on site by designating the area a wetland park. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted environmental re~,iew for the approval of the Victoria Arbors Village project as follows: A Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study identifying the scope of environmental issues, were distributed to the State Clearinghouse, Responsible Agencies, and Community Representatives and organizations on April 27, 1998, and notice was provided through publication on April 27, 1998 in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Newspaper. A total of 17 comment letters were received. Copies of those comment letters are included in Appendix A of the Dra~ EIR (under separate cover). Relevant com- ments received in response to the NOP/Initial Study were incorporated into the Dr~ EIR. · The Draft EIR was distributed for public review on December 18, 1998, for a 45-day review period with the comment period expiring on February 9, 1999. Five comment letters were received at the close of the public comment period. The specific and general responses to comments are in the Recirculated Draft EIR Appendix A. · A Notice of Completion (NOC) was sent with the Dra~ EIR to the State Clearinghouse on December 17, 1999, and notice was provided on December 26, 1998 in the following newspaper of general and/or regional circulation: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Newspaper 10/30/00(C:\WINNTxTemporary lnternet Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 2 Subsequent to the public circulation on the Draft EIR, changes to the analysis in the land use section and biological section of the EIR and the addition of an alternative necessitated the recirculation of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was recireulated for public review on March 30, 1999, for a 45-day review period with the comment period expiring on May 17, 1999. Five comment letters were received at the close of the public comment period. The specific and general responses to comments are in the Final EIR Appendix G. · A Notice of Completion (NOC) was sent with the Recireulated Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse on March 29, 1999, and notice was provided on April 12, 1999 in the following newspaper of general and/or regional circulation: - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Newspaper - The Final EIR was dislributed for a 10-day notification period beginning on May 12, 1999. - The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Project and raft`recommendations on February 24, 1999, March 10, 1999 and May 26, 1999. Following public testimony, and staff`recommendations, the Commission recommended to the City Council that the EIR is adequate and should be certified but did not recommend that the Council adopt these Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and approve the Project. - On July 7, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the staff recommendations. Following public testimony and staffrecommendations, the Council certified the EIR but did not adopt the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and did not approve the Project. - The City, in order to approve the Victoria Arbors Village project to provide for development of the project, conducted further environmental review in an Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR. - On November 8, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public heating on the Victoria Arbors Village project and recommended the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council approve adoption of the Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR and approve adoption of the ordinance approving the GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01. On , the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public hearing on the Victoria Arbors Village project approving the adoption of the Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR and approving the adoption of the ordinance approving the GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01. A. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT FINDING The City &Rancho Cucamonga retained LSA Associates, Inc. to prepare Draft EIR, Recirculated Dratt EIR, the 1999 Final EIR, and the Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR. All the four environmental documents were prepared under the direction and supervision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department, Planning Division. 10/30/00(C:\WlNNTxTemporary Interact Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 3 Finding: The environmental documentation reflects the City's independent judgment. The City has exercised its independent judgment in accordance with Public Resources Code, Section 21082.1(c)(3) in retaining its own environmental consultant, directing the consultant in preparation of the Draft EIR, Recirculated Drat~ EIR, the 1999 Final EIR, and the Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR as well as reviewing, analyzing, and revising material prepared by the consultant. B. FINDING ON THE 1999 EIR AND ADDENDUM Finding: The pr°p°sed changes to the Victoria Arbors Village as set forth in the initial Study/Addendum are only minor technical changes or additions to thc 1999 Final EIR to adequately make the 1999 Final EIR apply to the Project. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, an Addendum to the 1999 Final EIR is thc ' · Project. required environmental documentation for thc City's consideration of thc C. GENERAL FINDING ON MITIGATION MEASURES The City has determined that in preparing the conditions of approval for the Victoria Arbors Village Project, the City incorporated the mitigation measures recommended in the 1999 Final EIR. In the event that the conditions of approval do not use the exact wording of the mitigation measures recommended in the 1999 Final EIR, in each such instance, the adopted conditions of approval are intended to be identical or substantially similar to the recommended mitigation measure. Any minor revisions were made for the purpose of improving clarity or to better define the intended purpose Findings: Unless specifically stated to the contrary in these fmdings, it is the City's intent to adopt all mitigation measures recommended by the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum. If a measure has, through error, been omitted from the Conditions of Approval or from these Findings, and that measure is not specifically reflected in these Findings, that measure shall be deemed to be adopted pursuant to this paragraph. In addition, unless specifically stated to the contrary in these Findings, all Conditions of Approval relocating or rewording mitigation measures recommended in the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are intended to be substantially similar to the mitigation measures as worded in the 1999 Final EIR and are found to be equally effective in avoiding or lessening the identified environmental impact. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS City staff reports, the 1999 Final EIR, and Addendum, written and oral testimony at all relevant public meetings or heatings, and these Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and other information in the administrative record serve as the basis for the City's environmental determination. The detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures for thc Victoria 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tempora~ lnternet Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 4 Arbors Village Project are presented in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR, Recimulated Draft EIR and within the Addendum. Responses to comments and any revisions or omissions to the Recirculated and Draft EIR are provided in Appendix Gofthe 1999 Final EIR. The EIR evaluated eight major environmental categories (land use, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, aesthetics/visual, biological resources, public services, and cultural resources) for potential significant adverse impacts, including cumulative impacts. Both project-specific and cumulative impacts were evaluated. Of these eight environmental-categories, the City concurs with the conclusions in the EIR that the issues and subissues discussed below can be mitigated below a significant impact threshold and for those issues which cannot be mitigated below a level of significance, overriding considerations exist which make impacts acceptable. In addition to the eight major environmental categories addressed in the EIP,, seven other major categories were found to be nonsignificant in the Initial Study prepared for the Victoria Arbors Village project. The City concurs with the conclusions on these categories as outlined in the Initial Study (Appendix A of the Draft EIR) and finds that no significant impacts have been identified as to those categories identified in the Initial Study and no further analysis is requited. In addition the City prepared an Addendum to the EIR to addresspotential impacts which may result from the development of the Victoria Arbors Village site as a mixed use development. A. IMPACTS IDENI'IIqED IN THE EIR AS LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT REQUIRING NO MITIGATION The following issues were identified in the Initial Study (Appendix A of the Draft EIR) as having the potential to cause significant impact and were carried forward to the EIR for detailed evaluation. These issues were found in the EIR as having no potential to cause significant impact and therefore require no project-specific mitigation. In the following presentation, each resource issue is identified and the potential for significant adverse environmental effects is discussed. 1. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. Habitat for Endangered Species Potentially Significant Impact: Potential loss of habitat for rare, threatened or endangered species. Finding: Potential impacts of the proposed project on the loss of potential habitat for rare, threatened or endangered species is discussed in Section 4.7 in the EIR. The loss of potential, but unoccupied, habitat for such species is not considered to be a significant impact and no mitigation is required. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: Focused surveys were conducted for the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and the California gnatcatcher. The results of the surveys determined that the San Bemardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and the California gnatcatcher are absent from the project site. Construction of the proposed project would result in the loss of potential, but unoccupied, habitat for these species. The habitat loss is not considered 10/30/00(C:\WINNTXTemporat3' Interact Files\OLK 14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 5 to be a significant impact and no mitigation is required. b. Wildlife Movement Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project would interfere with local wildlife movement patterns. Finding: Potential impacts of the proposed project on local wildlife movement is discussed in Section 4.7 in the EIR. The analysis concluded that there would be no impact on wildlife movement and no mitigation is required. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The project site may have potential to be a habitat linkage joining undeveloped lands to the south and north. However, under existing conditions, it is reasonable to conclude that the project site is not a functioning habitat linkage or wildlife movement corridor. Several issues (restoration of off-site habitat, management and ownership of involved lands, and passageways for wildlife to cross existing roadways) would have to be resolved in order for the site to function as a habitat linkage. Under existing conditions, the proposed project would not substantially interfere with the movement of a resident or migratory wildlife species, therefore, project impacts to wildlife movement are not considered to be significant and no mitigation is required. B. POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT PACTS WHICH CAN BE MITIGATED BELOW A LEVEL OF SIGNIIqCANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following issues fi.om the environmental categories analyzed by the 1999 Final EIR, Dra~ EIR, and Recirculated Drat~ EIR; Land Use, Traffic and Circulation, Air Quality, and Biological/Open Space Resources, Aesthetics, Public Services, and Cultural Resources were found to be potentially significant, but can be mitigated to a less than significant level, with the imposition of mitigation measures. The City finds that all potentially significant impacts of the project listed below can and will be mitigated, reduced or avoided by imposition of the mitigation measures, and these mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted by thc City. Specific findings of the City for each category of such impacts are set forth in detail below. Public Resources Code Section 21081states that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. B. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. 10/30/00(C:\WINNTxTemporary Interact Files\OLK14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 6 C. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR. The City hereby finds, pursuant to Section 21081 that the following potential environmental impacts can and will be mitigated to below a level of significance, based upon the implementation of the mitigation measures in the 1999 Final EIR, Drafl EIR, Recimulated Draft EIR, and Addendum. Each mitigation measure discussed in this section of the findings is assigned a code letter correlating it with the environmental category used in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan included in the EIR, and adopted by the City to provide for the enforcement of such mitigation measures. 1. LAND USE a. Land Use Conflicts Between Existing and Planned Land Uses Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of single family residential would bc in conflict with surrounding commercial land uses and adjacent 1-15. The proposed project would create an incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this area. This incompatibility between the proposed residential and the I- 15 and planned commercial is a potentially significant impact. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project impacts on land use conflicts between existing and proposed land uses are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that any conflicts between existing and planned land uses are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. Noise 4. 4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the CiO/for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda ,~venue ; · Within 66feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester ,4venue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda ~tvenue ; 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tcmpora~ Interact Files\OLK 14kFINDINGS#2.WPD) 7 · Within 211feet of the centerline offuture Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269feet of the centerline offuture Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided Aesthetics 4. 6. lB Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8feet tqll to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure "for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. Th!s requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prtor to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4. 6. lC Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4. 6.2A The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized Facts and Analysis in Snpport of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that land use compatibility will be obtained through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.4 (Noise) and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. b. Land Use Incompatibility With the Adopted Victoria Lakes Village 10/30/00(C:\WINN'rxTcmporary lntcrnct Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 8 Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project conflicts with the adopted land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan. This incompatibility between these concepts of the Victoria Lakes Village is a potentially significant impact. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project impacts on conflicts with the adopted land use,-open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that any conflicts with the adopted land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to belo~v a level of significance. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20. 68 acres of parkland by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(1)B At the time offiling a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shah be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D The developer shah design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shah be 25feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shah tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shah connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tcmpora~ Interact Files\OLKI4WINDINGS#2.WPD) 9 4. 5.2(2)B The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's h'near park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Aesthetics 4. 6. lC Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4. 6.2A The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the conflicts with the adopted 'land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that land use conflicts will be avoided through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. c. Loss of 19-acres of Lake and Open Space Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project calls for the elimination of the 19 acres of lake open space, disrupting the physical arrangement of thc Victoria Community Plan and especially the Victoria Lakes Village. The elimination of the 19 acres of lakes and open space of the adopted Victoria Village Specific Plan is a potentially significant impact. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project impacts on the elimination of the 19 acres of lakes and open space of the adopted Victoria Village Specific Plan are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that the ProJect's ~mpacts on the lakes and open space are lessened or avoided and that no I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTempora~ Interact Files\OLKI 4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) ] 0 significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment o f fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland by fee or by dedication. 4. 5.2(1)B At the time o filling p tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)~1 The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plar~ 4.5.2(2)C The developer shall provide a system of trails within the propased project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Aesthetics 4.6.2B The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point I 0/30/00(C:\WINNT~Temporary lnternet Files\OLK 14~INDINGS#2.WPD) 11 concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/trails systems. 4. 6. 3,4 Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings,, and, landscaping to complement the viewshed These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the propased project corridor. 4.6.3C The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately follow~ng project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the elimination of 19 acres of'lake open space have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that the elimination of the 19 acres of lake open space will be mitigated through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. d. Residential Island within the Etiwanda Specific Plan Potentially Significant Impact:The proposed project would create a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, creating a potentially significant impact. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project creating a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that any conflicts with the adopted land use or the Etiwanda Specific Plan are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 10/30/00(C:\W1NNT~Tempora~ Interact Files\OLK14\FINDINGS#2.WPD) 12 Air Qualitv 4. 3. IA. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1.D The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4. 3. IF The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately oy pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. 10/30/00(C:\WlNN~Temporary lntemet Files\OLKI4kFINDINGS#2.WPD) ! 3 Noise 4.2.2 N~ise studies shaH be required t~ be submitted t~ the City f~r review and appr~val pri~r t~ final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194fee, t of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within211feetofthecenterlineoffutureDayCreekBoulevardbetweenBaseLineRoad and Church Street; and · Within 269feet of the centerline o f future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4. 6. lB Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shah be no more than 8feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure "for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the roadside of the sound wall. This requirement shah be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development barderingfuture Day Creek Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20. 68 acres of parkland by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(1.)B At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20. 68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shah be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan I 0/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tcmporary lntemet Filcs\OLK 14',FINDINGS#2.WPD) l 4 amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D The deve(oper shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4. 5.2(2)A The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The tkail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Aesthetics 4.6.1A New buildings within lOO feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4. 6.1C Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area ofi-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4. 6.2A The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized I 0/30/00(C:\WlNNTxTemporary Internet Files\OLK 14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 15 Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding:The potential impacts pertaining to the creation of a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less- than-significant through implementation of thc mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that the planned character of the area will be obtained through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics). e. "Sandwich" Effect of Residential Zones Between Commercial Zones Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project would also create a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan, creating a potential significant impact. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project creating a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that impacts associated with sandwiching residential zones between commercial zones in the Victoria Community Plan are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. Air Quality 4. 3. IA. The Construction Contractor shah select the construction equtpment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shah utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period shouM be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4. 3.1.D The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shah be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTcmporary Interact Filcs\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 16 4. 3.1E The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4. 3.1F The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4. 3.1G Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include, wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland by fee or by dedication. 4. 5.2(1)B At the time o filling a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 0/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Tcmporary lntemet Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 17 4.5.2(1)D The developer shah design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 aCres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)21 The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shah be 25feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shah tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shah be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4. 5.2(2)B The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plar~ 4.5.2(2)C The developer shaH'provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Noise 4.4.2 N~ise studies shaH be required t~ be submitted t~ the City f~r review and appr~va~ pri~r t~ final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; : · Within 378feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 211feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269feet of the centerline offuture Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shah be provided. 4. 6. lB Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and 10/30/00(C:\WlNNTxTcmporary Interact Files\OLK14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 1 8 should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Aesthetics 4.6. IA New bui~dt)~gs within lOO feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4. 6. lB Noise wails along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda A venue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement sftall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4.6. lC Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of l-15. The landscape design shall, be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4. 6. 2A The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the groun& and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. 4. 6. 3A Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the creation of a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less- 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Filcs\OLK 14WIND1NGS#2.WPD) 19 than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that the planned character of the area will be obtained through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics). f. Proposed Project is Incompatible with the Fillipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple and a Future Regional Mall Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project would be incompatible with existing land uses such as the Fillipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple and a future regional mall, and would create potential significant impacts. Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project being incompatible with existing land uses such as the F~lipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple and a future regional mall are discussed in Section 4.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that any land use incompatibilities are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.1.6.4 Lots within the Victoria Arbors Village project with backyards that abut upon commercial or office/professional uses shall be set back 60feet from the common property line. Homes on lots whose side yards abut commercial or office/profession uses shall be set back 30feet from the common property line. 4.1.6B The number of windows which look onto commercial or office/professional uses shall be minimized Windows which look upon these uses shall be double paned. Window insulation shall be sufficient to ensure interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. 4.1.6C .4n 8~f~~t s~ump b~~ck wa~~ sha~~ be c~nslructed a~~ng the c~mm~n pr~perty ~ine which separates the residential and non-residential use. The base of the wall shall be planted with a l 6-foot wide buffer (8feet of landscaping on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director 4.1.6D The CC&Rs for any residential unit abutting upon a non-residential use shall disclose the presence of the adjacent non-residential use and, to the extent possible describe the potential nuisances which might be generated by the non-residential use. 4. I. 6E No residential or non-residential use shall generate noise, odors, or unnecessary light, glare or shadow beyond the property line of said use. 4.1.6F .4 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear yard buffer shall be provided on the north side of Church Street between Etiwanda .4venue and Day Creek Boulevard Landscaping materials shall contain a variety of species used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare from potential I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTempora~ Interact Files\OLK 14~INDINGS#2.WPD) 20 commercial uses south of Church Street The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the creation of an incompatibility of the proposed project with the Fillipi Winery and the Nichiren Shoshu Temple have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation &the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that an incompatibility of land uses will not occur. 2. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION a. Roadway Constru~:tion and Improvement Potentially Significant Impact:Fifteen intersections are forecast to exceed the minimum LOS standards under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours. These are: Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue · Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue/San Bemardino Avenue · East Avenue/Base Line Road Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road · I- 15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road I-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project impacts on LOS at fifteen intersections are discussed in Section 4.2 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that impacts associated with LOS at intersections are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level &significance. 4.2. IA The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee t~rogram for backbone infrastructure (Transportation Department Impact Fee Ordinance No. 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKl 4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 21 445) as the project's fuir share contribution to additional circulation improvements identified as necessary to maintain an acceptable level of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Applicant shall make a fair share contribution to traffic mitigations as determined by the City Engineer. The additional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: · Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane. Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a third eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a third westbound through lane and a northbound right turn lane. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane. Victoria Parl~ Lane/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of an eastbound right turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition ora southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, the addition ora northbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane. · Etiwanda A venue/Victoria Street - By 2015, signalization. Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue - By project opening, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a northbound left turn lane, a northbound right turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Etiwanda /tvenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound free right turn lane, and a southbound through lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opening, the addition of a northbound through lane. By 2O l 5, further improvements include the addition ofa second northbound left turn lane, a third northbound through Jane, a southbound through lane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a third ~orthbound through lane and a third southbound through lane. East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition ora northbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. $0/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 22 Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road - Byproject opening, the addition o. fa second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition ora second northbound left turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound right turn lane, and an eastbound right turn lane. · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition ora second southbound right turn lane. 1-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound left, conversion of the northbound right turn lane to a free right turn lane and the addition ora second northbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition ora second northbound right turn lane and a third westbound through lane. 4. 2. lB Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (i. e., local jurisdiction and/or ~ANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and implementation of these improvements, the -following mitigation measure or condition of approval is recommended: Prior to the approval o,f any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic from the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing o,f the improvement, and the funding source. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to fifteen intersections exceeding the CMP LOS standard under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. The mitigation measures will enable the City to implement its traffic fee program to fund off-site traffic improvements made as a result of the project. The traffic fee program is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic mitigation measures in the vicinity of the project. b. Freeway Deficiencies Potentially SignificantImpact: The proposed project will contribute to deficiencies along the following freeway sections: B. SR-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue C. SR-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue D. I-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue E. I-10 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue 10/30/00(C:\WINNTXTemporary lnternet Files\OLKI4~FIND1NGS#2.WPD) 23 F. I- 15 Northbound - Jurupa Avenue to Sierra A~,enue G. I- 15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue Finding: Issues associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project impacts on freeway segments are discussed in Section 4.2 of the 1999 Final EIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures stated below will ensure that impacts associated with implementation of the Project on freeway segments are lessened or avoided and that no significant impacts remain. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance 4.2.2 The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to the cost of providing the following freeway lane additions: SR-30 Eastbound LA County Lme to 1-15 -additton of two lanes 1-15 to Alder Avenue -addition of one lane SR-30 Westbound LA County line to 1-15 - addition of two lane 1-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition o f four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addition of two lanes Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addition of three lanes Milliken Avenue to 1-15 - addition of four lanes 1-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-10 Westbound LA County line to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes Milliken Avenue to 1-15 - addition of three lanes 1-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Northbound Jurupa Avenue to 1-10 - addition of one lane 1-10 to Cherry Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jurupa Avenue - addition of one lane Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project pertaining to deficiencies along the freeway section of SR-30 between Jurupa Avenue and Sierra Avenue. On 1-10 there are deficiencies along the freeway section 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Filcs\OLK 14~FllqDINGS#2.WPD) 24 between LA County line to Citrus Avenue and freeway sections of 1-15 between Jurupa Avenue and Sierra Avenue. The traffic impacts within the segments listed have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. The mitigation measures described below will enable the City to collect fees on a fair share basis for freeway lane additions. The traffic fee program is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic mitigation measures in the vicinity of the project. 3. AIR QUALITY a. Grading and Construction Emissions Potentially Significant Impacts: Peak grading and construction emissions would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for the criteria pollutant of NOx, which is 2.5 tons per quarter and PMI0, which is 150 pounds per day. Emissions of other criteria pollutants would be below the standards. This is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with implementation of m itigation measures. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and PM10 during construction are discussed in Section 4.] of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that air quality emissions during construction of the Project have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of thc mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance 4.3.1.4 The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period shouM be extended thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 10/30/00(C:\WINNlhTemporary Imemet Files\OLKI4\FINDINGS#2.WPD) 2:5 4. 3. ID The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4. 3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During cons~uction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. .drier clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. : Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts peak*aining to the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and PMI0 during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. b. Volatile Organic Compound Emissions During Construction Potentially Significant Impact: Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions associated with architectural coatings are not calculated because there is no sufficient information available for emissions produced by the painting of residential and commercial facilities. VOCs produced during construction may be a potentially significant impact. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to VOC emissions during construction are discussed in Section 4.3 &the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that air quality emissions during construction of the Project have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant I 0/30/00(C:\WlNNTxTemporary Interact Files\OLK 14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 26 through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance 4.3.1H The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 4. NOISE a. Construction-related Noise Potentially Significant Impacts: Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA at the closest residences to the northeast of the project site north of Base Line Road or to the east of Etiwanda Avenue for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction-related noise impacts would be potentially significant. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to construction related noise are discussed in Section 4.4 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that noise during construction of the Project has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.4. IA During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 4. 4. lB The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. 4. 4. lC. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. 10/30/O0(C:\WINNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKI4\FINDINGS#2.WPD) 27 C 4.4.1D During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit aH construction- related activities that wouM result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to noise levels from grading and other construction activities on nearby residences have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. b. Long-term Noise Potentially Significant Impacts: Increases in noise levels could result from project-related traffic on access roads leading to the project site. Project-related long-term vehicular trip increases would be 45,487 daily. The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than 2 dBA, except along Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard, where the increase would be 4.7 dBA but no sensitive uses exist currently. No significant traffic noise impacts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would potentially be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the 60 dBA Ldn standard recommended:for residential uses. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to long-term noise are discussed in Section 4.4 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the long-term increase in noise of the Project has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.4.2 N~ise studies sha~~ be required t~ be submitted t~ the City f~r review and appr~va~ pri~r t~ ~na~ map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within211feetofthecenterlineoffutureDayCreekBoulevardbetweenBaseLineRoad and Church Street; and 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tempora~ lntcrnct Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 28 · Within 269feet of the centerline offuture Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Facts and Analysis in Snpport of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to exposing on-site residential uses to noise levels exceeding standards along area roadways have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 5. PUBLIC SERVICES Schools a. Generation of Additional Stndents Potentially Significant Impact: As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Etiwanda and Chaffey School Distzicts, both districts have urged and continue to urge the City not to approve development applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development project. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School DistrictYChaffey Joint Union High School District and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to generating additional students are discussed in Section 4.5.1 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on schools has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.5.1A The developer shall be required to execute an agreement with Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Unified High School District to provide adequate mitigation. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Planning Commission approval for any residential project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual implementation of the agreement by the payment offees, dedication of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permits are obtained. 4.5.1B In the event that the developer declines to execute a mitigation agreement, the City shall require full mitigation as a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello-Roas Community Facilities district for school facilities. In order to 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tcmporary Interact Filcs\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 29 reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding:The Project's impact on schools has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. Parks and Recreation a. Increase Demand for Active Recreation Facilities Potentially Significant Impact: The residential portion of the proposed project would increase the demand for active recreation facilities within the Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. For the Victoria Community Plan area, the proposed project must provide 22.41 acres of parkland, and for the Etiwanda Specific Plan, an additional 2.35 acres for a total of 20.68 acres of parkland is required for the proposed project. Currently, the proposed project has only provided for a total of 8.62 acres of active recreational facilities causing a deficiency of 20.68 acres of active recreation which is a significant impact to park facilities. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the Project causing a deficiency in active recreation are discussed in Section 4.5.2 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on active recreation has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less- than-significant through implementation of the mitigatio~ measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.5.2(1)4. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 24. 76 acres of parkland either by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2.(1)B At the time of. filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of propertyfor 24. 76 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu off ecs are necessary, lf the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding:The proposed project's impact on parks has been I 0/30/00(C:\WINNT~Temporary Internet Filcs\OLK 14kF1NDINGS#2.WPD) 30 eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. b. Increase Demand for Trail Facilities Potentially Significant Impact: The residential and commercial areas proposed would increase the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the Project increasing the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City are discussed in Section 4.5.2 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on active recreational facilities and trail use has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-~an-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.5.2(2).q. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shah be widened by 20 to 25feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shaH tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shah be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B The developer shah follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4. 5.2(2)C The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts of the proposed project on trails have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. To mitigate the potential impacts to trails and to also implement the City's Master Plan of Trails, future development proposals must provide additional acreage for trails to meet the need within the City. 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary lnternet Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 31 Police a. Increase Demand for Police Services Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in a potentially significant impact as an increase in demand for police services. An additional five police personnel would be required for the proposed residential and commercial development. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the Project increasing the demand for police services are discussed in Section 4.$.3 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on police services has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less- than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within thc 1999 Final EIR, The following mitigation meSsure from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum is still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.5.3.4 .4s stated in the General Requirements and .4pprovals for the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shah be filed with City Engineering prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for any projects within the project area between Base Line Road and l-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts of the proposed project on police services have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. Fire a. Increase Demand for Fire Services Potentially Significant Impact: Impacts of the proposed project on fire service for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are potentially significant. Based on the standard response time threshold of five minutes, and the project's location relative to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is anticipated to fall within the five-minute response time criteria. Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to the Project increasing the demand for fire services are discussed in Section 4.5.4 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on fire services has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 10/30/00(C:\WINNTxTemporary Internet Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 32 4.5.4.4 The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. 4. 5.4B The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler systems in commercial, industrial, and multi- family residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts of the proposed project on fire services have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 6. AESTHETICS a. Loss of Planned Open Space Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project would replace 19 acres of lakes and open space, for increased residential and commercial uses, causing a substantial loss of planned open space. This would significantly alter existing and future public views and view corridors. Finding: The potential impacts of the Project on aesthetics re discussed in Section 4.6 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on aesthetics has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.6.1,4 New buildings within lOO feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1B Noise walls alongfuture Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure "for these Scenic Corridors, and shouM be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4. 6. lC Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area o fl- 15. 10/30/00(C:\WINNTXTemporary Intemet Files\OLKI4WINDINGS#2.WPD) 33 Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential visual impacts of the proposed project have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. b. Light and Glare Potentially Significant Impact: New light and glare would be created by the addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area previously proposed as a utility corridor. The most significant glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking that may be lit at night and that would be visible from roadways such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. Finding: The potential impacts of the Project on light and glare are discussed in Section 4.6 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on light and glare have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.6.2,~ TheDesignReviewpr~cessf~rc~mmercia~establishmentsandpub~icp~acessha~~ensurethatn~ significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized 4.6.2B The developer shah account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/trails systems. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential visual impacts of the proposed project by the introduction of additional light and glare into the project area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. c. Conflicts with City's Design Policies Potentially Significant Impact: The project could conflict with policies of the City's General Plan 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Temporary lnternet Files\OLKI4WINDINGS#2.WPD) 34 Community Design Element and recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan. Finding: The potential conflict of the Project with the policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan are discussed in Section 4.6 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's conflicts with the policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.6.3A Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setback~ within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 4.6.3B To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City 's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4. 6.1 shall also be implemented 4.6.3C The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. 4. 6.3D The parkway on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard shall be widened by 20 to 25feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Roadsouth to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to future Day Creek Boulevard The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shah be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding:The potential conflict of the proposed project with the policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLK 14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 35 y, _ I// design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. Loss of Plant Communities and Wildlife Habitat Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project would substantially diminish habitat for wildlife or plants; this impact is considered to be significant. Finding: The Project's impacts on diminishing habitat for wildlife or plants arc discussed in Section 4.7 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on wildlife and plant habitat have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measures from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum are still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.7.3A Minimize the amount of coastal sage scrub lost as the result of development (i.e., preserve the majority of the habitat on site) through project and construction redesign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those areas of coastal sage scrub impacted. 4. 7.3B Restore (to ensure no-net-lass of acreage and quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these habitats from elsewhere on site. 4. 7.3C Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team Arundo) to pro~,ide compensation for the loss of O. 4 acre of mixed willow series. 4. 7.3D Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide substitute resources for the coastal sage scrub that wouM be lost through project construction. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location that would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoining the North Etiwanda Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on the project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to diminishing habitat for wildlife or plants have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. b. Wetlands Habitat Potentially Significant Impact: The proposed project proposes to retain 0.97 acre of wetland on site. The retention may have a significant impact on the City's ability to improve or divert flows in the drainage system north of the proposed project area. Finding: The Project's impacts on wetlands are discussed in Section 4.7 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 10/30/00(C:\W INNTXTe mpora~y Internet Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 3 6 C 1999 Final EIR determined that the Project's impacts on wetlands have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measure from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum is still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.7.5A ~ftheCitydesirest~e~iminatetheretenti~n~fthewet~and~nsite~anindividual4~4permitshallbe obtained.from the Corps by the applicant. Mitigation required by the Corps may include creation or enhancement of off-site wetland habitat at a ratio o fat least 1:1 and as high as 3:1 (i. e., 3 acres created for each acre impacted). Provisions of the permit shall be adhered to prior to the issuance of grading permits for the area which contains the wetland Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts on wetlands have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 8. CULTURAL RESOURCES a. Historic Human Burials and Cultural Materials Potentially Significant Impact: The potential for historic human burials and/or cultural materials may be present in the project area. Finding: The potential for the Project to disturb historic human burials and/or cultural materials during construction on the Project site is discussed in Section 4.8 of the 1999 Final EIR. The 1999 Final EIP, determined that the Project's impacts on historic human burials and/or cultural materials have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures described within the 1999 Final EIR. The following mitigation measure from the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum is still applicable and will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.8.1 In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If human remains are encountered, the San Bernardino County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours. If the coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendent (MZD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The potential impacts pertaining to disturbance of human remains during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the 1999 Final EIR. 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKI4WINDINGS#2.WPD) 37 C-.l/3 C. IMPACTS ANALYZED IN THE FINAL EIR, DRAFT EIR, RECIRCULATED DRAFT EIR AND ADDENDUM AND DETERMINED TO BE SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE. With the implementation of all available and feasible mitigation measures recommended in the 1999 Final EIR, Draft EIR, Recirculated Drat~ EIR, and Addendum the following adverse impacts &the proposed Project stated below are considered to be significant and unavoidable, both individually and cumulatively, based upon information in the EIR and Addendum, in the record, and based upon testimony provided during the public hearings on this project. These impacts are considered significant and unavoidable despite the mitigation measures which are imposed and which will reduce impacts to the extent feasible. 1. AIR QUALITY a. Increased Vehicle Emissions Significant Unavoidable Impact: Vehicular trips associated with the Victoria Arbors Village Project - would produce emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx. Finding: Issues associated with the Project's impact on air quality are discussed in Section 4.3 &the SEIR. Implementation &the mitigation measures identified in the 1999 Final EIR would not reduce the criteria pollutant emissions for CO, ROC, and NOx associated with vehicle emissions of the proposed project to a less than significant level. This air quality impact would remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation. This impact is overridden by the project benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations The following measures from the 1999 Final EIR and are still applicable, but will not mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. 4.3.3.4. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as' preferential parking for vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or vanpooling/ carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. 4.3.3B. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic-fibers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 4.3.3C. Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, Metrolink stations, and commercial centers. 4.3.3. D. The developer shah contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTempor ary Internet Files\OLK 14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 3 8 Facts in Support of the Finding: Although emissions of these criteria pollutants would be 11 percent less than those associated with the original development plan analyzed in 1999, mobile source emissions associated with the Victoria Arbors Village project would exceed daily thresholds established by SCAQMD (550 ppd CO, 75 ppd ROC, and 100 ppd NOx), and is an impact which remains significant and unavoidable. IV PROJECT ALTERNATIVES For purposes of analyzing potential environmental impacts, the Section 6 of the Draft EIR and Reeirculated Draft EIR evaluated the proposed project and four alternatives. The four alternatives evaluated are the No Project Alternative (as required by CEQA), Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan, Low Medium Density Residential, and School/Park Alternatives. These Statement of Facts and ~:indings address the proposed project as the alternative to be considered for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to staff's recommendation. Characteristics of the preferred alternative are provided herein. The following is a brief description of the alternatives considered, see Section 6.0 of the 1999 Final EIR for more detail. Environmentally Superior Alternative The No ProjeeffNo Development Alternative is an Environmentally: Superior Alternative since no development would occur on the project site. Unlike the proposed project or the project alternatives, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not increase demand for public services, increase traffic volumes, circulation, air emissions, and noise levels (associated with construction and operation of additional land uses), cause the additional need for recreational facilities, or increase potential impacts to biological or cultural resources, land use incompatibilities, and aesthetics that may otherwise result from development of the project site. Significant short-term construction emissions would be eliminated, and significant unavoidable long-term CO, ROC, and NOx emissions would be reduced with the No Project/No Development Alternative. As required by CEQA (Section 15126(d)(4), if the No ProjeeffNo Development Alternative is selected as the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. Among the alternatives considered, there was not an alternative to the proposed project that would contain a development scenario that would not have a significant adverse impact on air quality. Even after mitigation is implemented, the Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative, the Low-Medium Alternative, and the School/Park Alternative would continue to have unavoidable adverse impacts on air quality. Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative has the least damaging environmental impacts on aesthetics with the inclusion of lakes and associated open space. Of the viable alternatives, the School and Park Alternative would result in a slight increase in daily and peak hour vehicle trips and contaminant emissions but when compared with the proposed project all other impacts are generally considered the same. There would, however, be an increase in the available open space with this 10/30/00(C:\WINNTxTemporary Intemet Files\OLKI4kFINDINGS#2.WPD) 39 alternative by providing an open space trail system from the winery through the adjacent park south to Church Street. This would result in less impacts on open space than for the proposed project. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative. If the site is to contain the lakes and open space area proposed in the Victoria Lakes Village, the City would have to provide long-term maintenance of the area. The cost to maintain the lakes and open space may cause an additional burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for the open space and lakes is not certain. Low-Medium Density Alternative provided a more logical land use alternative to the impacts associated with increase noise and potential incompatibility issues of locating office commercial uses (OP) adjacent to single family residences (LM). This alternative would require changing OP to LM in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Loop. However, there still exists the potential impacts of noise and increases pollutants by locating LM adjacent to the I-15 Corridor in the area of Church Street. This is also an impact of the p~'oposed project. Through the analysis in Section 4.0 of the 1999 Final EIR and the alternatives analysis in this section, it was determined that the proposed project is the environmentally superior alternative. As discussed above none of the alternatives with the exception of the No Build/No Development Alternative reduces the long-term impacts on air quality. With implementation of proposed mitigation, the p.roposed project's impacts on land use, traffic, noise, aesthetics, parks, open space, schools, police, biological resources and cultural resources have been reduced to levels of less than significant. No Project Alternative Under the No Project/No Development Alternative, the project site would remain in its existing vacant condition. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project would be avoided, especially the proposed project's impacts on air quality which remain significant aider mitigation. Evaluation of the No Project ~4lternative The No Project/No Development Alternative would reduce and/or eliminate all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed project. In particular, significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx), would not occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in impacts Ly eliminating opportunities to provide housing and meet the goals of the City's General Plan Housing Element. Finding: The No Project/No Development Alternative was rejected as an alternative because it would fail to meet three important objectives of the project and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The first objective is to preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City and provide a variety of housing types for various income levels; the second objective is to protect the neighborhood quality and residential nature of the neighborhood to the east; the third objective is to provide infill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community 10/30/00(C:\WINNTxTemporary lnternet Files\OLK14~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 40 Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative This alternative suggests that the project site be developed under the approved plans of the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Under the Victoria Lakes Village Plan of thc Victoria Community Plan, the proposed project is designated for higher residential densities. The character of the lakes was to be formed by the unique relationship of thc residential, commercial, and recreational land uses surrounding a system of three terraced lakes that are designated as the village open space. Under this alternative, the 25.48 acres residing in the Etiwanda Specific Plan of thc proposed project would remain Office/Professional as designated in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Evaluation of the Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan .4lternative The Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative would reduce but not eliminate all pote,ntially significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed project. In particular, significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for daily operations by a large margin would still occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in potentially greater impacts to air quality, noise and traffic because the approved Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plans in this area propose a greater number of dwelling units and intensity of land use. This alternative would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire but especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students generated by the proposed project. The approved Victoria Community Plan does not provide for a school site and would have a significant adverse impact on elementary schools in the area. This alternative would reduce the aesthetic impacts (open space) of the proposed project by providing more open space acreage in the form ora tiered lake feature from Base Line Road south to Church Street. This linear feature would include active park space and a trails system. The proposed project includes a trails system that is in conformance with the requirements of the Victoria Community Plan. This trail would tie the trail system north of Base Line Road to trails planned south of Church Street and west to Day Creek Channel. The proposed project also includes a 7.1-acre active community park adjacent to a 10.6-acre school site. Both the proposed project and this alternative lack the required park space needed to meet the needs of the planned increase in population. Mitigation would be required of both the proposed project and this alternative to reduce impacts to parks to less than significant. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of The Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative. If the site is to contain the lakes and open space area proposed in the Victoria Lakes Village, the City would have to provide long-term maintenance of the area. The cost to maintain the lakes and open space may cause an additional burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for the open space and lakes is not certain. 10/30/00(C:\W1NNT~Tempo rary Intcrnet Filcs\OLK 14L!elN DINGS# 2.WPD) 41 Finding: The Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative was rejected as an alternative because the significant unavoidable impacts of the Victoria Arbors Village Project on air quality would not be avoided nor substantially lessened with development of this alternative. Low-Medium Density Residential Alternative Under the Low-Medium alternative, the project site would be developed to have low-medium density residential north of Church Street, south of Base Line Road, between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Loop. This land use category allows for low medium density single family residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) which is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment opportunities, and thoroughfares. The Office Professional designation would be eliminated and replaced with the Low- Medium designation (Figure 6.1). The Iow-medium density residential is the most common use in the proposed project and the addition of this use along Etiwanda Avenue would be compatible with what is proposed. Evaluation of the £ow-Medium Density/llternative With the exception of potential impacts to public services, impacts associated with the Low-Medium Density Residential Alternative are either the same/similar or less of a potential impact than those stated in the proposed project. Significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin, would still occur with this alternative. Although this alternative would slightly increase the number of vehicle trips ~o/from the areas in question, this increase would not be considered significant. Potentially greater impacts to public services would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire, and especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students generated by the proposed project. Adherence to mitigation measures stated in the proposed project will reduce impacts to public services to a less than significant level. Finding: The Low-Medium Density Residential Alternative was rejected as an alternative because the significant unavoidable impacts of the Victoria Arbors Village Project on air quality would not be avoided nor substantially lessened with development of this alternative. This alternative would also increase impacts to public services and schools. School/Park Alternative Under the School/Park Alternative the school and park would be located adjacent to the winery, south of Base Line Road and west of Victoria Loop. There would also be an open space corridor that would extend from the wetland area west of Victoria Loop south to Church Street. This alternative would promote an open space feel between the winery and the park and could possibly tie the historic theme of the winery with the park. Proposed land uses west of Etiwanda and north of Church Street would remain Office Professional (OP) and Low-Medium (LM) (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) for the remaining areas between Victoria Loop on I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTcmporary Interact Files\OLK 14WINDINGS#2.WPD) 42 the west, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, Base Line to the north and Church Street on the south. This area is all within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This alternative proposes to leave an OP buffer adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue that includes and Nichiren Shoshu Temple and the existing residential property on the northwest corner of Church Street and Etiwanda. Evaluation of the School/Park ~llternative With the exception of potential impacts to public services, impacts associated with the School/Parks Alternative are either the same/similar or less ora potential impact than those stated in the proposed project. Significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin would still occur with this alternative. Although this alternative would slightly increase the number of vehicle trips to/from the areas in question, this increase would not be considered significant. Potentially greater impacts to public services would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire, and especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students generated by the proposed project as does this alternative. Adherence to mitigation measures stated in the proposed project will reduce impacts to public services to a less than significant level. This alternative would have a beneficial impact on aesthetics by providing a view shed corridor south through the park and school site from travelers on Base Line Road. The location of the park adjacent to the winery may also provide opportunities for activities including historic preservation and vineyard related ~xperience to occur. However, locating a park in the central portion of the project site can provide for a neighborhood connection to surrounding residential development. Finding: The School/Parks Alternative was rejected as an alternative because the significant unavoidable impacts of the Victoria Arbors Village Project on air quality would not be avoided nor substantially lessened with development of this alternative. This alternative would also increase impacts to public services and schools. Alternative Site to the Victoria Arbors Village Project An alternative site was not considered because the Victoria Arbors Village Project is simply modifying the existing, entitled project; therefore, relocating the proposed project to another site is impossible. An alternative site would not accomplish the objectives of the proposed project that is to amend the original approved plan and was, therefore, rejected from further consideration. VI. PROJECT BENEFITS The benefits from the approving the Victoria Arbors Village Project are related to the establishment of a residential and commercial planned development that will provide a new, high quality residential community 10/30/00(C:\WINNT~Tempora~, lnternet Files\OLK 14\FINDINGS#2.WPD) 43 within the City. The benefits of the Victoria Arbors VillageProject will result in a well-designed urban type development that provides for some major backbone infrastructure that would not be made available to the community without this Project's development. The following benefits will occur as a result of project implementation. 1. All feasible mitigation has been proposed to reduce or avoid potentially significant impacts identified in the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum, and no additional feasible mitigation is available to further reduce all potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance. 2. The adoption of the Victoria Arbors Village project is necessary to provide for the orderly growth and development of the area by providing policies, regulations, and guidelines that will guide further development in a manner consistent with the policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the desires of the community, and ensure provision of infrastructure improvements that are necessary to provide for adequate circulation, delivery of utilities, control of drainage, and disposal of wastewater. 3. The Victoria Arbors Village project is necessary for the City to adequately control and regulate orderly development and help ensure that new development is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 4. The Victoria Arbors Village project provides a circulation system which incorporates bicycle, pedestrian, and automotive considerations resulting in a balanced transportation system within the project area. The trails will connect the residential neighborhoods with the commercial regional areas within the community. VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations with respect to the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum, specificallyincreased local and regional air pollutant emissions from future development. This section of findings specifically addresses the requirements of Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, which require the Icad agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable significant impacts and to determine whether the impacts are acceptably overridden by the project benefits. The City finds that the previously stated major project benefits, see Section V and VI above, of the Victoria Arbors Village Project, outweigh the unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts noted above. Each of the separate benefits of the proposed development to be governed by the planned development cited in Section V above, is hereby determined to bo, in itself and independent of the other project benefits, a basis for overriding all unavoidable environmental impacts identified in the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum and in these findings. The City's findings set forth in the preceding sections have identified all of the adverse environmental impacts and the feasible mitigation measures which can reduce impacts to less than significant levels where feasible, or to the lowest feasible levels where significant impacts remain. The findings have also analyzed four altematives to determine whether there are reasonable or feasible alternatives to the proposed action or whether they might reduce or eliminate the significant adverse impacts of the proposed Project. The 1999 Final EIR and Addendum 10/30/00(C:\Wl3qNTxTemporary lnternet Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 44 present evidence that implementing the development of the Victoria Arbors Village Project will cause significant adveme impacts, which cannot be substantially mitigated to nonsignificant levels. These significant impacts have been outlined above and the City makes the following finding: Finding: Having considered the unavoidable adveme impacts of the Victoria Arbom Village Project to construct the planned development, the City hereby determines that all feasible mitigation has been adopted to reduce or avoid the potentially significant impacts identified in the 1999 Final EIR and Addendum, and that no additional feasible mitigation is available to further reduce significant impacts. Further, the City fmds that economic, social, and other considerations of the Victoria Arbors Village Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts described above. The reasons for accepting these remaining unmitigated impacts are described below. In making this finding, the City has balanced the benefits oftheVictoria Arbors Village Project as developed against its unavoidable environmental impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those risks. Furthermore, the City has considered the alternatives to the project, and makes the following finding: Finding: Feasible alternatives to the Victoria Arbors Village Project which are capable of reducing identified impacts have been considered and rejected because the alternatives offer a reduced level of benefit when compared to the Victoria Arbors Village Project. The City further finds that the Victoria Arbors Village Project's benefits are substantial and override each unavoidable impact of the project, as follows: 1) Findings Regarding Air Quality Impacts Construction activities occurring in th Victoria Arbors Village Project area, including mass grading, will result in short-term increases in air emissions that exceed applicable thresholds of the SCAQMD, despite the imposition of mitigation measures. Short-term increases in air emissions from construction can be mitigated but are not entirely avoidable, as construction activities within this region will continue to provide necessary and vital housing. This impact is overridden by the new housing and jobs provided by the Victoria Arbors Village Project. The impacts from the Victoria Arbors Village Project on air quality will increase local and regional pollutants despite the imposition of several mitigation measures and implementation of Best Available Control Technology. Increases in local and regional pollutants are not entirely avoidable, as development activities within this region will continue to provide necessary and vital housing. This impact is also overridden by the new housing and jobs provided by the Victoria Arbors Village Project. VIII. ADOPTION OF A MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM FOR TH]g CEQA MITIGATION MEASURES 10/30/00(C:\WlNNT~Temporary Interact Files\OLKI4~FINDINGS#2.WPD) 45 Section 21081.6 of the Public Resoumes Code requires the City adopt a monitoring plan regarding the changes in the project and mitigation measures imposed to lessen or avoid significant effects on the environment. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP), included as Appendix H in the 1999 Final EIR, is adopted by the City as modified, because it fulfills the CEQA mitigation monitoring requirements: 1. The MMP is designed to ensure compliance with the changes in the pmj~t and mitigation measures imposed on the project during project implementation; and 2. Measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements or other measures. I 0/30/00(C:\WINNTxTcmpora~ Intcrnct Filcs\OLK 14~F1NDINGS#2.WPD) 46 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PRIOR TO CONSIDERATIONS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) consisting of that document entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01" has been certified bythe City Council on July 7, 2000, by Resolution No. 99-148, as completed in compliance with CEQA. 2. Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section 21089, a Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bemardino on July 13, 1999. 3. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to review and consider the information contained in the Certified EIR, the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, prior to the Planning Commission consideration of the proposed project entitled "General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01 ." 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports of November 8, 2000, together with public testimony, and the consideration of the contents of the Certified EIR, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga take the following action: a. Review and consider the information contained in the Certified Final EIR prior to Planning Commission consideration of the proposed project. b. Adopt a Statement of Facts and Findings for the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and ~B" respectively, based on the following findings: 1) The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final EIR. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 & ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY November 8, 2000 Page 2 2) The Final EIR identified all significant environmental impacts of the project and there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. 3) All significant impacts identified in the Final EIR as a result of the project have been mitigated, avoided, or reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are incorporated herein by the reference. 4) The Final EIR considered a reasonable range of alternatives to the project. Potential mitigation or project alternatives have been incorporated into the project to reduce the impacts. 5) The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered. Except for the one identified unavoidable impact described in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR, mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. 6) The unavoidable significant impact of the project as identified in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR is outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. 3. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lany T. McNiel, Chairman A'I-I'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the November 8, 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01. A. Recitals. 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) consisting of that document entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01" has been certified bythe City Council on July 7, 2000, by Resolution No. 99-148, as completed in compliance with CEQA. 2. Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section 21089, a Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bemardino on July 13, 1999. 3. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to review and consider the information contained in the Certified EIR, the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, prior to the Planning Commission consideration of the proposed project entitled "General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01 and Eitwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01". 4. On , 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to review and consider the information contained in the Certified EIR, the Statement of Facts and Findings, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, prior to the City Council consideration of the proposed project entitled "General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01'. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that a:: of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on ,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and the consideration of the contents of the Certified EIR, this Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga takes the following action: a. Adopt a Statement of Facts and Findings for the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "B," respectively, based on the following findings: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS FOR OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 November 8, 2000 Page 2 1 ) The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final EIR. 2) The Final EIR identified all significant environmental impacts of the project and there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. 3) All significant impacts identified in the Final EIR as a result of the project have been mitigated, avoided, or reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. · These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are incorporated herein by this reference. 4) The Final EIR has considered a reasonable range of alternatives to the project. Potential mitigation or project alternatives have been incorporated into the project to reduce the impacts. 5) The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered. With the exception of one identified unavoidable impact described in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR, mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. 6) The unavoidable significant impact of the project as identified in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR is outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. 3. The Secretary of the City Council to this shall certi~ to the adoption of this Resolution. THE CITY OF I~AN C IlO CUCAHONGA DATE: November 8, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors village on approximately 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31,33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11,12, ,20, 22, 23, and 25; and 227-211-40. 1. Change the Land Use for approximately 232.8 acres of land from Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre), Community Facilities, Regional Related Office/Commercial, and Park to Mixed Use. 2. Amend the Cireulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. 3. Amend the land use, various graphics, and text for the Victoria Community Plan. 4. Change the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 27 acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan generally located at the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street; change the zoning from Office Professional to Mixed Use; and consider retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-04. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, AND ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV. CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND: In January of 1998, the applicant submitted multiple land use amendments to the City. Because there were substantial changes to the land use, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required. The EIR was completed and processed according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In July of 1999, with the Planning Commission recommendations, the City Council certified the EIR to be complete and adequate; however, did not approve the land use amendment. With regards to the proposed land use changes, the City Council raised the issue of the appropriate land use for a large land area generally bounded by Base Line Road, 1-15 Freeway, Day Creek Channel, and Foothill Boulevard. The land area in question included the proposed project area. In particular, the City was concerned with the transition of density from residential areas to the regional mall site and the appropriate land uses surrounding the historic winery. The reasons for the concerns were that there was a strong sentiment to preserve the existing winery and the City was in the process of updating the General Plan. Both the Planning Commission and the City Council felt uncomfortable in reviewing and taking action on the proposed land use changes without the completed General Plan Update. Sensing that the Planning Commission and the City Council would not support the proposed land use changes, the applicant requested putting his land use applications on hold indefinitely. With the City's General Plan Update steadily progressing, and with anticipation of a future regional center proposal from Forest City Development Company, the applicant requested reactivation of the proposed land use amendments. ANALYSIS: A. General Plan Amendment 98-02: 1. Relationship of Proposed Amendment with the City's General Plan Update: The proposed amendment is within a major land use study area for the General Plan Update generally bounded by Base Line Road, Etiwanda Avenue, Day Creek Channel, and Foothill Boulevard, as shown in Exhibit "B." The applicant has attended a series of General Plan Task Fome meetings and now understands the direction the City is heading in for the land use for this special study area. In addition, the proponent has been working with Forest City Development Company in jointly molding the development concept for the residential village in relation to the future regional center. The land use concept proposed by the General Plan Task Force is Mixed Use. The applicant feels that their proposed project is consistent with the concept advocated by the General Plan Task Force. 2. Amend the Land Use Desiqnation to Mixed Use: The land use concept proposed is Mixed Use. The current General Plan has provisions for this land use designation. Exhibit "F" shows the Mixed Use boundary for the proposed project. The remaining areas that are "not-a-part" within the entire village will be subject to separate General Plan and Victoria Plan Amendments or the citywide General Plan Amendment slated tentatively for early 2001. A proposed Mixed Use land use designation will allow the zoning to establish a range of residential uses from Low to High density, a mix of commercial, community, and civic uses, and a mixed use of commercial with residential above. Staff Comments: Staff believes that the proposed Mixed Use is consistent with the direction of the City's General Plan Update. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, AND I:SPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV. CO. November 8, 2000 Page 3 3. Amend the Circulation, and Park and Recreation Elements of the General Plan: Because the development concept includes the extension of a central spine street, Victoria Park Lane, the Circulation Element needs to be amended to reflect that. The development concept also includes a 7.5-acre park and a 10~acre school. The Park and Recreation Element needs to be amended to reflect the changes. Exhibit "G" shows the changes to the two elements. B. Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01: 1. Land Use Concept. The proposed land use concept is a Mixed Use zone consistent with the above proposed land use designation. The proposed Mixed Use zone will allow a range of residential uses from Low to High density, a mix of commercial, community, and civic uses, and a mixed use of commercial with residential above. Based on the applicant's proposal, the core of the village, which is bounded by Base Line Road, Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Channel, and Etiwanda Avenue, can be divided into three main neighborhoods in land use arrangement. Between Base Line Road and the future Church Street is a more single-family oriented neighborhood. Between Day Creek Boulevard and Day Creek Channel, south of the future Church Street, is a neighborhood with a mix of multi-family residential and commercial uses. The last neighborhood is the regional center. Staff Comments: Staff believes that the proposed Mixed Use zone is consistent with the direction of the City's General Plan Update. By requiring a Master Plan, the final arrangement and pattern of residential land use densities, commercial, and civic/community uses, and the necessary buffering of incompatible land uses will be refined. A Condition of Approval requiring a Master Plan prior to the first residential development has been placed in the proposed ordinance. Another Condition of Approval requires setting up design criteria on the arrangement of residential land use with proper transition of residential density where higher density, such as condominiums and apartments, will be placed adjacent to or mixed with commercial uses. For the commercial-oriented land uses, including the regional center, a separate Master Plan will be required at the time of development. The Design Review Committee/Planning Commission will have the opportunity to review the Master Plan through a series of workshops. 2. Villaqe Concept. The purpose of a village concept is to establish a distinctive character of a village by describing its looks, features, and design. With the outgoing lakes concept, the applicant has had to find a substitute distinctive character. Because there is community sentiment to preserve the existing winery located at Base Line Road, the applicant is attempting to capture this, and create a winery theme and use it as the essence of the entire village. By describing the design and architectural elements typically found in wineries or wine countries, the applicant hopes to establish a winery character for the residential development. According to the applicant, those described elements will be expanded in the future Master Plan design guidelines for the residential neighborhoods. The village features a school; park; demonstration vineyards around the winery as a buffer; multiple greenways, paseos and trails linking residential neighborhoods to the school, park, and regional trails, such as along Day Creek Boulevard; and a strong north/south central spine PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, AND ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV. CO. November 8, 2000 Page 4 street from the winery south to the heart of the regional center terminating at a village green or square. Graphics or pictures depicting the essence of the central spine street are shown in the plan. Staff Comments: The current Victoria Lakes village is unique in design using the lakes as a strong central unifying element for the entire village. However, the winery- flavor village concept proposed by the applicant merits support. Following are Conditions of Approval that the applicant must address at the time of Master Plan submittal: a. Add language in the residential portion of the village that requires lots under 5,500 square feet to have innovation in subdivision design and housing products. Add references that exhibits of innovative housing products are to be shown in the future Master Plan and shall be followed. At the October 25, 2000, Planning Commission workshop, the applicant provided examples of housing products that de-emphasized the garages, as shown in Exhibit "J." The Planning Commission accepted them in concept and directed the applicant to follow through with the Master Plan, which shall be submitted for review. b. Demonstrate how the buffering vineyards south of the winery facility can be privately maintained without burdening City's resources. c. Provide a strong pedestrian/paseo/trail (30 to 50 feet wide) connection between Victoria Park Lane, at Base Line Road and Victoria Loop Road, to the central spine street. Provide a special treatment for the intersection of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road to redirect the primary pedestrian paseo to the newly created central spine. d. The central spine street shall be the extension of Victoria Park Lane and resume the planned community concept in its street width (133 to 180 feet) and trail continuation. This central spine street serves as the focal point of the residential portion of the village and connects to the future regional center through an open space village green and square. This central spine street shall have the following elements: reduce street pavement as deemed safe by the City Engineer; provide a Class I bike path to one side of the widened parkway; and provide a centralized theme of amenities in the median island, such as, but not limited to, the arbors with showcase of grape varieties, pedestrian friendly street furniture, water elements, display of art pieces, a minimum width of 40 feet for the medium island, etc. e. Provide a strong vertical element/landmark, for example a tall clock tower, at the village green. f. Within City maintained areas, demonstration vineyards, viticulture and/or agricultural displays, and landscaping are discouraged. Instead, the grove imagery of citrus or other orchard crops can be promoted through formal ornamental tree plantings. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, AND ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV. CO. November 8, 2000 Page 5 g. Provide a master plan of greenways and paseos for the neighborhood west of Day Creek Boulevard, south of future Church Street. 3. School and Park: The location of a school was considered previously and accepted by the Etiwanda School District. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the park site and accepted the location at their October 19, 2000, meeting. The graphics showing the design of the park is for illustration only, and is subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and approval. 4. Open Space: The Victoria Lakes village has 19 acres of open space in the form of three tier lakes. The proposed Victoria Arbors village for the residential portion of the village has a total of 9.5 acres of open space in the form of greenways, paseos, an extension of Victoria Park Lane, and demonstration vineyards. Because the development concept for the village includes a large village green and square within the commercial regional center, the open space total for this village will increase to similar size acreage. 5. Additional Staff Comments on Text and Graphics of the Community Plan Chanqes: Staff has additional comments as marked on the document, as shown in Exhibit "D." The applicant agreed to revise the text and graphics to address staff comments. A Condition of Approval is placed in the attached Resolution requiring that the final version of the pertinent pages, including graphics, statistics, and sections of the Community Plan incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval. C. Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01: The applicant proposes to move 27 acres located at the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street from the Etiwanda Specific Plan to the Victoria Community Plan and to change the land use from Office Professional to Mixed Use. Staff Comments: The proposed Mixed Use zone is consistent with the direction of the City's General Plan Update. The General Plan Task Force did not provide directions on whether boundaries between the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Victoria Community Plan should be changed or maintained. However, it is evident from the General Plan Task Force discussion that a change in the land use to Mixed Use would not negate the special development and design standards currently existing in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has added language to ensure that d3velopment projects within 150 feet along Etiwanda Avenue will use the development and design standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The language also mentioned that the houses will be architecturally plotted fronting on Etiwanda Avenue. Therefore, staff recommends that the 27 acres be moved to the Victoria Community Plan and not be retained in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOPS: The Planning Commission conducted two workshops on October 11, and 25, 2000, to review the proposed changes. The Commission supported the proposed change in the land use and the development concept but directed the applicant to address concerns regarding providing exceptional design for housing products under 5,500 square feet. Attached are draft copies of the workshops minutes (Exhibit '1"). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 98-02, VCPA 98~0t, AND ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEV. CO. November 8, 2000 Page 6 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4 by 8-foot public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet around the project site. In addition, key community representatives and residents of the Victoria Planned Community and the Etiwanda Community have been sent notices of this pubic hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed changes to the General Plan, the Victoria Community Plan, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. If the Commission concurs, then a recommendation of approval will be forwarded to the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, Brad Buller, City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Current Victoria Lakes Village Exhibit "B" - General Plan Special Study Area Development Applications Exhibit "C" - Excerpts of Victoria Community Plan That Need Changes Exhibit "D"- Proposed Changes to Victoria Community Plan Exhibit "E" - Current Land Use for Victoria Lakes Exhibit "F" - Proposed Land Use for Victoria Arbors Exhibit "G"- Circulation and Park and Recreation Elements Exhibit "H"- Illustrative Concept Plans. Exhibit "1" - Draft Minutes October 11, and 25, 2000, Planning Commission Workshops Exhibit "J" - Illustrations of Housing Products Design Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 98-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01 Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01 ~~-- VICTORIA ~KES :[:., ~/ COMMUNITY PLAN .. ~,, ..o~ Victoria VCPA 98-01 / ESPA 98-01 A Rann~ ~mmun~ / ~ ~o Cu~monga , ,~ Exhibit "A" ' . ~ .... SPECIAL STUDY AREA / "Mu .LI LEGEND .. ;::;: H = High Residential LM = Low-Medium Residential MU = Mixed Use OP = Office Park RC = Regional Center RR = Regional Related Commercial 'o_,' Special Study Area ~ ~erican Beau~ Land Use Change ~ General Plan Update or Developer Land Use Change PA 98-02 ~PA 98-01 VUI~I~ Area i will be a residential village called Vic:oria Groves and will contain a multi-use open space which will use the exis~fng"~p~r gre~ $~ove'on the-old .fa.tm fas. irs.theme .... Area 2 will be a residential village called Victoria Vineyards and its thematic character will be genera:ed by an active use park in its center with combined school and communi=~ faci!it~, / I Area 3 will become a residen:ia! village called Victoria ~ ~ Windrows. Its central open space will be a more passive .i_~'. park with a small lake as its focus. The design of =his park will extend and reflect the existing E~iwan~a characte: with a plan=lng ~esign =ha= utilizes =he existing windrows an~ p~ Area 4, Victoria Lakes, will be a unique multi-use .. inc!u~ing a ser~es of lakes, each surroun~ed.~ a successi:n . ~ of land uses from residen~ia! ~o office ~o co~ercia!, cu~ina=ing in a Regional Shopping Center a= Foo=hi!! amd =h~ Devote Freeway. ~GPA 98-02 VCPA 98-01 fixhibit "C" ,, Dq / Victoria Linear Park will connect each of the Villages' central open spaces and¢ in ~urn, connect the residential pot%ions of the community together. The park will have a rustic, natural feeling: informal tree masses and naturalized shrubs and grasses, meandering pedestrian an~ bicycle :rails will run the entire length, providing a framework for community activity. O CRY. ATE A RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYST=M THAT ENCOURAGES PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND EQUESTRIAN CIRCULATION A system of trails will weave throughout the community, connecting residential areas to one another, and to the community open space system. The trails will connect the community wi~h the regional open space and trail system along Day Creek and Deer Creek. The trail system will take various forms: sometimes along roads, between different land uses, through residential areas, or within open space corridors. It is a system which is adapted to its particular location yet ties together as an uninterrupted connecting system. The diagram shows conceptually how the open space and trail system will work to accomplish this. G CREATE AN OVERALL LANDSCAPED URBAN ENVIRONMENT WHICH IS · PERCEIVED AND USED AS A SPECIAL PLACE BY THE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF VICTORIA, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND THE R~mION. The special landscape quality of Victoria will be created by using %he'established local landscape vocabular~ throughout the new community. The windrow style of planting - trees with a vertical growing habit that are planted in a closely spaced linear pattern .- will be found throughout Victoria as Special Boulevards, adjacent to utility corridors, and weaving through residential areas as part of the trail system. The naturalized landscape character of Victoria · Linear Park is an extension and enrichment of the rustic quality that pervades the planning area. The lake system is a dramatic new element which will reinforce the connection between the residential and commercial land uses, and will provide an exciting, effective urban focus for Victoria. '~'HE VICTORIA COMMUNITY LAND USE PLAN On the following pages is the land use plan for the planning area. On this diagram, the integrative open space elements that unify the residential and commercial uses. of each village have been illustrated. Victoria Groves, Victoria Vineyards and Victoria Windrows each have a multi-use community facility as the central village amenity. Victoria Linear Park links these open spaces together and provide one continuous pedestrian and bicycle trail system for the entire community. At the terminus of Victoria Linear Park, adjacent t~o Victoria Lakes, is a larg~ community recreation facility. A lake overloo~ at this loc~tion will allow views znto the heart of the regional center. connection to the regional center is provided by the public pedestrian and bicycle trails of Victoria Linear Park, which follow the lake edge into the regional center. 'The residential areas at--the central community ~ the trail system. __ The focus of urban activity is the regional shopping center. The lake system actually comes into th~ heart of the shaped center, creating an active exciting place for people with a mix of civic, community and commercial activities along the lake edge. Surrounding the regional center will be related commercial businesses, offices and some residences. Within each Village, a convenient neighborhood shopping center will serve the everyday needs of Village residents. The goal is to provide a balance of commercial activities within Victoria and Rancho Cucaalonga ~hat encourage a more interesting and diverse city and promotes the conservation of energy and natural, resources by placing these facilities close to the people who will be using them. ~ ~__ PROPOSED FWY ; ' * LM M BASELINE ri,- COMMUNITY PLAN Victoria A Planned Community in Rancho Cucamonga LAND USE ~EGEND RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL CF Community Facility RC Regional Center RR Regional Related O~celCommercJa~ VC Village Commer~al · ,r,..oU.t.e.~,,',.egco.',,'.,.,',ty. REVISED DATE 04/15/98 PROPOSED FWY HIGHLAND .INE ER COMMUNITY PLAN Victoria A Planned Commu.~ify in Rancho Cuca~o_.'~',~a. 'HILL RESIDENTIAL LM Low-medium 4-8 DUIA h MH Medium-High 14-24 DUIA i H High 24-$0 DUIA' : COMMERCIAL RC Regional CCh[er --REVISEDDATE 04/15/98 )l{,,.t9 vc .I T}IE VI?.?~GE OF VICT~I~IA LAKES A IINIQU~ WATER-~LATED U1RBAN COM)~UNITY The character of Victoria Lakes is formed by the unique relationship of the residential, commercial and recreational land uses surrounding the lakes which become the village's central open space. The intent is to create a high quality, water related community, with an active, people-oriented water edge that serves the'residents of the Victoria Lakes Village, the entire community of Victoria, and the City. of Rancho Cucamonga in general. VILLAGE The most gracious entrance to residentimm portions of the Village is on Victoria Park Lane at Baseline. North of Baseline, Victoria Linear Park's landscape character and design is similar throughout its entire length. South of Baseline, however, Victoria Park Lane takes on a more formal character, with regularly spaced trees. Victoria Park Lane terminates at a large circular pedestrian plaza at the north end of North Victoria Lake. Victoria Park Lane terminates at a large circular pedestrian plaza at the north end of North Victoria Lake. There will be a lake overlook at this point, a destination where pedestrians and bicyclists can gather and look across the open vista created by the lakes and lakes' edges. A conceptual plan of the pedestrian plaza is shown below: [1] This circular pedestrian plaza shall be softened to reduce the impact of the amount of hardscape. PEDESTRIAN PLAZA TM~: VIL~G~ The Village edges are ~.he railroad =racks on '.he Nor=h, Etiwanda Avenue on =he Eas=, the Devote Freeway on =he Southeast and Day Creek on the Wes=. The e~ge tread'hen= for Etiwanda Avenue and =he railroad tracks have been discussed previously. The proposed treat, men= Of the Day C=eek right- of-way and the adjoining Sou=hem California Edison corridor is shown in below. Because of the excel!eh= v~sibility of the southern half of the Village from the Devote Freeway, most of the land adjacent ~:~ ~he freeway will be occupied by the regional shopping center and relate~ con~ercial facilities. This serves the needs of =he major depart, men= stores for freeway visibility and access, and the needs of the residential community for buffering from the freeway. Da3 Cr=k / 5 C E PUBLIC PAR/~ AT NORTH VICTORIA LAKE Along the western edge of North Victoria Lake, a public park facility will be located. This park will serve the entire community and provide uses compatible with the character of the lake. Lake edges will be public to provide maximum access to this special park. A conceptual plan of the park and lake is shown on page 76a. REGIONAL RELATED USES ON LAKE EDGE The regional related uses adjacent to South Victoria Lake would be compatible with both the residential community to the north and the regional center to the south. Some commercial activity, such as restaurants, etc., would be appropriate in this area. Additional residential uses, should they be necessary, would also be appropriate on the lake. edge. TRAILS FOLLOW LAKE SYS~M INTO HEART OF THE REGIONAL CENTER [3'] The park and trail system of Victoria Park Lane shall continue around both sides of all three lakes down to Miller Avenue where it is expected to cross Miller and continue into the regional center.' The quality of the edge, that is, whether it appears as a natural lake edge or an urban water edge may vary. [3] However, the lower lake edge shall be designed with a more urban water edge, such as bulk-heads. The Natural Lake Edge cross- section shows a typical eight-foot trail and edge condition at the lake in the residential areas along North Victoria Lake. A cross section depicting a portion of the trail system that connects the lake area to Victoria Loop Road between the residential areas east of the lakes is shown on page 76a. 76 {~EVISED DATE PARK / LAKE CONCEPT TRAIL SECTION (See Page 77) -~,-~, \ ~ ~ /. ....... "'~ / ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT PLAN ','-'..: .~2';' ~~,~., ' ~ t ' "' ' ":" '/ ' VICTORIA LAKES SOUTH ~,~.. AND REGIONAL CENTER Victoria ~ ~,~:t~ ~ A Planned Commumty "~:~:' ~ in Rancho Cucamonga ~-. ~~ :.. . . _. Namra! £,:lfje. P~ESIDENTIAL LAND USE IN VICTORIA LAKES The residential.land uses of this village will be consistent with the character of the place that is being proposed. Residential densities will range from Low-Medium to Medium-High in this village. The Low-Medium residential (LM) designation allows from 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Medium-High Density residential land use category (M~) includes housing products in a range of 14 to 24 dwellings per acre. Because of their location on the lake edge these dwellings will be of quality character and highly desirable, matching their unique setting. 78 ~, RR H / ~ AVENUE ,,, . '~,~ i RR RR RR 'Ii VICTORIA LAKES RR LAND USE I.;GEND ,r / COMMUNITY' PLAN · ' ~' Victoria , ~- A Planned Community ,'~ .~' in Rancho Cucamonga ____ ..-- ~q REGIONAL CENT~ IS URBAN FOCUS FOR VICTORIA The regional center will be the commercial focus of Victoria and of the region (which extends beyond the City of Rancho Cucamonga to include western San Bernardino County). It is important that this center fulfill its role as the active terminus of the community-wide open space system, and as an outstanding regional commercial facility. The array of department stores and commercial activities that typically fill a regional center will be a great credit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, both in the image it creates for the city, and in the revenue it provides through sales taxes collected by the regional center merchants. The pedestrian plaza and trail system that connects the center to the community will make this development a unique place that will function as the civic plaza for Rancho Cucamonga, and where many public functions can occur. On the following page is an illustrative diagram showing the character of the center's north entry that will make this place exciting, people-oriented and active. This entry to the regional center is conceptually designed to function in concert with the entry to the Regional Related uses directly north across Miller Avenue. The potential for two specialty restaurants at this location would include water features flanking their entry. The trail system will have direct, convenient access to the center from the expected specialty restaurant uses. 80 DEPT. STORE 6 DEPT. STORE 5 F~TUR MALL ~ S.HOP$ r~V~FD DATE TYPICAL REGIONAL RELATED LAND USES The category called Regional Related Commercial and Office use includes those activities that typically orient themselves to a regional center, but, for various reasons, do not need to be contained within the center itself. Below is a conceptual diagram that shows how these various uses may fit into a coherent pattern. The illustration is not to be construed as a specifically proposed plan at this time. , I; PUBI~IC TRANSPORT ANDMASS TRANSIT Victoria will accommodate several levels of public transportation. At a local level, mini-bus service on Victoria Park Lane could provide efficient community access to the regional center and related commercial and office uses from the residential villages. City-wide bus service on arterial roads will assure adequate connections to city services and facilities. Should rapid transit facilities be built within the existing railroad right-of-way, the plan proposes a possible location for a rapid transit station at Baseline and Day Creek Boulevard. COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Victoria Community plan wi!! provide community facilities to meet community needS. These facilities will be convenient to village residents an~. will minimize dependence on facilities outside the community~ pARKS ~ND OPEN SPACE Parks and open space have been integrated in=o the community to form the character and identity of each individual village, as well as Victoria as a whole. This will be accomplished by locating park and community facilities at the center of each village, connecting the residen=ial areas to the central facilities via an extensive trail system, an~ then connecting each village open space by Victoria Linear Park. Village Parks in residential areas will be large enough to accommodate facilities for use by all village residents. Placing parks next to school playgrounds and facilities will also maximize efficient use of community open space. The lake system will serve as the open space for the re- side'rial, commercial and o:iice spa¢=~ Lha~ surround them, and as-~n--'l-n=ergra:ive open space ei~men~ for all of_ Victoria. This is assured by the public lake edge, which will be accessible ~o all, and ~he sequence of land uses on the lake which will create an exciting transition from the residential land uses to the north, and the regional commercial center a: the southern terminus. In addition to the open space provided by Village parks, Victoria Linear Park, an~ the victoria Lakes open space that is part of the flood control or Southern California Zdison will serve many community needs. Where appropriate, regional t. rail connections can be made through the Day Creek 97 or Deer Creek flood ccntr:i channel riGht-of-ways. Edison corridors can provide !and for agricultural uses such ~ turf farms, nurseries, orchards, or community Gardens. Flood control !and and pu~!ic utility corridors wi!! otherwise remain in a natural condition, providing habitat and refuge for native wildlife. SCHOOLS Schools have been planned for Victoria to complement and reinforce the open space system. They will he located close to the village parks in the residential neighborhoods, and access by foot or bicycle via the trail system is assured. Joint use of school facilities for broad con~munity needs will be encouraged to make the schools a hub of activity for village activities. CHURCHES In addition to the several sites that exist within, the core planning area, this Plan has proposed several new si'.es. They are indicated on the Land Use .:lan. Other arrangements are also encouraged for religious groups including: a. Shared facilities at local schools. Though this is not a suitable permanent solution, it can serve temporary needs. 3. Sho.=ping centers or adjacent to shopping centers, including Village Ccrmmercial, Regional Related and Regional Center, are permissible locations for churches. They can share use of the commercial uses parking during the off-hours of Sunday morning. c. Condominium churches per.mi: joint use church complexes and a reduced land cost for church groups. Such innovative uses and plans are encouraged within the ?!armed Community. CONSerVATION Of RE~OU~CE$ Wi=n&n the Planned Community many elements have been struc=ure~ to provide for ~he conservation of resources. The following discussion suma~arizes how this is accomplished. USE WATER FOP, PLANT MATERIALS WHERE THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS MOST water will be conserved whereve= possible by u~ing low maintenance or drought tole=att plant material. For example, Victoria Parkway will have a rustic, naturalized character created by informal plantings of trees, shrubs and grasses. This %aracter exists now and is a conscious way of exten~im% the naturalized landscape to create a strong ¢c-_~unity identity. Allo~ing ~he grasses and shrubs to establish a naturalized character will preclude ~he necessity cf wats=lng =hess plants heavily in ~e clryer mon=hs and will lows= future maintenance costs. Conserving water in naturalized areas will allow the use of water where i= will be most effec=ive for intense community use, such as in ~he parks and lakes. The parks, therefore, will have some lawn areas which wi!l accommodate the many · uses t. hat require a well main=ained lawn. ALAKE SYSTEM CAN SAVE WATER ~ A ~roperly installed and well maintaine~ lake system also conserves water in several important ways. Firs=, fo: lakes of ~he size proposed in ~his plan, t. be ac=ual wa=er use on a year to year basis is about the same o: less as for an equivalent amount of carefully =ul=ured open space. They will actually use less water than an equivalent amount of !an~ in ~he same place used as a golf course. Second, a properly designed lake will minimize percolation of water into the ground water table, so that actual net losses will only be due to evaporation. Third, the lake system could use recycled water, should it become available. The lake system is not used as a conveyance for project storm flows. During storm conditions, North and Central Victoria Lake inflows from direct precipitation over. the water surfaces.and the surrounding lake edges can overflow and spill into South Victoria Lake from which flows are directed to Day Creek. Finally, a body of water of the size proposed by this plan will have a greater impact as a u~e environmental amenity than an ec$/ivalent amount of well irrigated ! open space, and at the same time could result in a net water savings. In the case of Rancho Cucamonga, a lake solution is the most resourceful way to develop an interesting and viable community center. EXTENSIVE TRAIL SYSTEM ENCOURAGES USE OF BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS Trail systems work best where they connect the community residents to the places they use most. The trail system in victoria is extensive'and will provide the connection that will be most useful to its residents. Direct access is provided to local parks and schools, to village commercial centers, to regional trails and open space, and to other villages. On a regional level, connections will be made to the community's major commercial centers, to the developing industrial center and to neighboring Terra Vista. A Community Trail is planned along t-he north side of Miller Avenue that will connect the village to the greenway trail in Terra Vista. This system will encourage bicycles and pedestrians thereby reducing automobile traffic and improving air quality. 100 STATISTICAL SUMMARY STATISTICAL SUMMARY PLAN EVOLVES THROUGH TIME The purpose of this section is to explain how residential density and the amount of acreage devoted to the land uses proposed can work together to make the Victoria Community Plan-m-reality. As the plan is presented here, the optimum residential yield is 8,255 dwelling units, or approximately residential dwelling units per acre within the planned community. SUMMAP'OFLAND USE ACREAGE The following acreage~ represent the proportions devoted to each land use as shown on the Land Use Plan. These calculations are based on planimeter readings and are  subject to correc=ions based on an accurate su=vey. ~ l. Commercial Acres Regional Center (including lakes within Regional Center area only) !00 Regional Related Commercial Village Commercial Centers 35 2. Community ?acilities Sohools 40 3. Parks, Lakes and Community Trails Village Parks (The Groves, The Vineyards, The Windrows, including lake in Windrows Park) 40 Lakes and Lake Edges (Village of Vio=oria Lakes only, not including lakes in ~ Regional Center area) 20 Vic:::ia Linear~ ~:-'...~ (not including paved area cf Victoria Parkway) 35 Community Trails 5 4. Unimproved O~en $oace Southern California Edison Corridors 170 '~ay Crack'Channel; ?lood Control Basin .., !25 Southern Pacific Right-Of-Way 25 Roads Milliken, Highland,Baseline, Foothill, Day Creek Boulevard and paved area of Victoria Parkway (pavement width) 120 7. Residential Land Uses 955 Land Within Planning Area Not A Par= of Planned Ccmunity 280 ~ · To=al Planning Area Acreage 2150 AP~R©ACH TO RESIDENTIAL DENSITY The Land Use Plan for Victoria contains six different kinds of reside~tia! land use designations. As described in the plan, ea :esiden=ia! land use designation will con=ain a variety cz housing types at various densities that are ccmpatib!e wi=h tha~ land use designation. Generally, the types of housing produc~s allowed within a given land use area wi!! be in a specific density range. These density ranges are summarized in '.he foi'-'owing chart: RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RANGES Low Density Single Family attached and detached 2-4 Dwelling homes on large lots, or clustered to Units Per maximize the effective use of open space Adjusted Gross Acre Low Medium Density Single family attached and detached 4-8 du/A homes on lots varying from 3000 SF to 7200 SF Medium Density Attached single family homes, ~-'14 du/A including duplexes, fourplex/ condominiums, townhomes (front and rear loaded) and condominiums. Detached homes may be possible at 'the lower end of the density range. Medium Hi?h Density Mul:ifamily homes with common open 14-24 du/A space Ei~.h Density Mul~:ifamily homes; .typica!ly a 3 story 24-30 du/A building with covered and uncovered parking THE OPTIMUM YIELD CONCEPT Although a density range is a useful tool in determining the upper and lower guantity of residential units proposed for any lan~ use, it is misleading to use as the precise guide in determining the actual number of dwelling uni{s within any specific village or !and use category when both the ci=y and its developers must commit a cetain level of expenditure to implement the plan. Therefore, the method of dealing with densit~ in this plan is based upon a realistic understanding of units which are necessary to provide the amenities described, the infrastructure needed, and the demands of the housing market. This number of units, or optimum yield, has been established for each village as an optimum number of units for that area based on the residential and community uses within that village. This planning approach provides density control, allows future flexibility, and establishes a realistic allowance for planning infra-structures. The key is to provide enough units of housing to assure housing needs can be met from local employment growth at prices locally employed workers can afford. A REALISTIC APPROACH TO RESID~'NTIAL D,F_N$1 i--f Several reasons point to the optimum yield approach: First, simply using the density range as a multiplier for each respective land use acreage produces a numerical range of dwelling units that is artifioa!ly skewed on both high and low ends. The high end number of dwelling units assumes that %very land use'category could be developed at the maxL~um density'allowable. This does not reflect the intention of The Wi!lia~ Lyon Company nor market needs which must be met over a long period of time. initially, lower density will be needed mos=, but as =he area ma=utes, =he majority of housing required to meet the City's needs will have to be met by attached housing. The low number of dwelling units is also unrealistic in that it .would force prices too high, and thereby not. allow the developer to mee~ the need for housing generated by the expanding local employment base. The optimum yield approach proposes an optimum number of units based on a sound understanding of what could reasonably be built on this site, retaining benefits both for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the developers over a long period of time. This assumes a balance between short and long term needs for housing: in the short term, a majority of detached houses; in the long term, a majority of attached ownership houses. The optimum yield allows for adequate infrastructure planning and commitments to open space and recreational facilities. Other amenities and necessities can be properly sized and space allocated. Second, there are actual housing types that yield specific residential densities within the density range of each land use category which are most realistic. For example, category "LM", single family residential, includes products that yield from 4.5 du/acre to 6.8 du/aore. In determining the expected yield of dwelling units, these different products have been allocated throughout the "LM", category land use areas to provide a mix which represents today's best understanding of present and future market demand, and to provide the mixture of housing opportunities specified in the Rancho Cucamonga proposed General Plan. summarized as follows: ~~ Residential Persons Per Dwelling Popula=ion Category ~ousehold Units Pro~ection "L" Low Density 3.4 450 1530 "LM" Low Medium Density 3.4 2120 7208 Medium Density 2.5 2395 5985 "M~" Medi~ High Density 1.5 1945 2917 High Density 1.5 1150 1725 Totals 8255 20,021 111 Non-native ornamentals that are drought tole=an= will also be used. Acacia (Acacia spp.), Olive (Olea eu=c.~ea}, Eucalyptus (Eucal.v?=us spp.) and Pines (Pinus spp.) a.'e some of the plat. ts that are suggested for use within Victoria. Palms (Wasnino.=onia spp., Phoenix spp.) also contribute to the existing landscape character, are drought resistant, and will he used in Victoria. WINDROW STYLE PLANTING Linear plantings of tall, upright species of trees will be found throughout Victoria and will.make a major contribution to ~he urban design quality. Al=hough =he Blue Gu~ (Eucal.v?=us ~lobu!us) is the traditional windrow tree in California, many other trees can he used to create =he same landscape character. Eucalyptus, Silk oaks {Grevillea robusta) and Lombardy Poplars (Populus ni~ra 'italioa') are several of the many species that could be used in Victoria in areas designated for ~he windrow style planting. Among the areas that will have this treaUnent are: arterial road edges, along =rails =hroughou= residential areas, adjacent to the SCE corridors =o screen views of the transmission towers, or along %he ~lood control or railroad right-of-way. The design concept is to borrow f=~n the exis=ing landscape vocabulary a s=rong element ~.hat can be spread throughout Victoria to provide co"~uni=y identity and character. .~~Y HIERARCHY The Entry H~erarchy Plan on the following pages shows the locations where a special landscape =rea=men= should mark an entry into Victoria. Generally, =zees and other plants should be the dominant elements of these en=r~ statements. Large conspicuous monuments and signs -are no= appropriate for these permanent entry t:ea~men=s, though temporary signs may be necessary during development, and are permit=ed. : L / / $ P P..R. ... / J l ~:~t;~,.~. ENTRY HIERAFIC:HY ~L. AN I FGEND: %.j Major Community Entry Major Residential Entry Special Entry Minor Community Entry Minor Commercial Entry T,,~ E~j/-/~ Plum. ,sh,~ r~ PLANT PALETTE PLAN LEGEND WINDROW STYLE m.,.~N'r'~G ROAD EDGES ~,,,~ T~¢ S~ t~l ~k~ ~ ~~ P~S & SCHOOLS TYPICAL EDGE CONDITIONS~ Section at Residential Land Uses Section at Commercial Land Usee DAY CREEK BOULEVARD / :' I '...'"---'-': / / % ~e .eeo · · · ; .....,.... · . / I l~ · · . / STANDARD ROAD CROSS-SECTIONS REFERENCE PLAN I m REGIONAL CIRCULATION D~j C~/c ~/~y~ ~=, ,MILLER & VICTORIA LOOP oooooETIWANDA & VICTORIA STREET · "..- LOCAL RESIDENTIAL ROADS ~ VICTORIA PARK LANE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT OCTOBER Z~ :ZOO0 Submitted to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. GPA 98-02 VCPA 98-01 ESPA 98-01 Prepared by Exhibit "D" PDS WEST 31271 Paseo Sereno San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 (949) 489-3181 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT This Community Plan Amendment document changes specific text and graphics, making the Victoria Community Plan consistent with the current project, Victoria Arbors. This document changes the name of the Village of Victoria Lakes to the Village of Victoria Arbors. The changes are ordered by page number of the original Victoria Community Plan document. This is the first Administrative Draft of the amendment text for the City's review, and contains all of the proposed text changes, subject to the City's request for additions or further changes. Many of the required changes to the document graphics have also been made and included. The remainder will be submitted at a later date, as the design evolves. Questions regarding this amendment document should be addressed to Bob Lacoss, PDS We t~./~49~489-,3.~1. A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AMENDMENTS TO VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN Page 26 -Area 4 Area 4, Victoria Arbors, will be a unique, multi-use community which features a linear boulevard/pedestrian way that ties a historic winery to a centrally~located school/park to new downtown with a town square and village green. Page 27 Graphic-An Interrelated Community of Villages- Create new description. ~ HighlanO Avenue VICTORIA ~ VICTORIA GROVES . WINDROWS VICTORIA V~EY~S .... community facilities I north VICTORIA I Interrelated Communi ~ mixed use village ~cmatically tied to iu historic ~nc~. Thc of vmag~ msidmtial ~nion odmtcd around ~nion f~uscd on a Regioml Page 28 - Text- Section C 1 C. CREATE A COMMUNITY-WIDE OPEN SPACE SYSTEM - A "LINEAR PARK" - THAT TIES THE VILLAGES TOGETHER AND CONNECTS TO THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CITY AND COUNTY OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS. Victoria Linear Park will connect each of the Villages' central open spaces and, in turn, connect the residential portions of the community together. In most of the villages, the park will have a rustic, natural feeling: informal tree masses and naturalized shrubs and grasses, meandering pedestrian and bicycle trails will run the entire length, providing a framework for community activity. .The open-space system will terminate in Victoria Arbors whose key element is a landscaped boulevard spine which connects a historic vineyard, centrally-located park/school site, and regional downtown with a main street, village green and central town square. Page 28 - Graphic - Victoria Linear Park Drawing - Change to match submittal <,3 A linear park with pedestrian and bicycle paths connecting community facilities. Character of park ,.,aries over its length. Connects to Regional Trail. ictoria Linear Park Page 29 - Graphics - Change Community Trail System to match submittaL D. CREATE A RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM THAT ENCOURAGES PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND EQUESTRIAN CIRCULATION A system oft'rials will weave throughout the community, connecting residential areas to one another, and to the community open space system. The trials will connect the community with the regional open space and trail system along Day Creek and Deer Creek. north CHURCH ST. SYSTEM The trail system will take various forms: sometimes along roads, between different land uses, through residential areas, or within open space corridors. It is a system which is adapted to its particular location, yet ties together as an uninterrupted connecting system. The above diagram shows conceptually how the open space and trail system will work to accomplish this. Page 31 - Local Circulation Plan - Change to match current submittal north Local Circulation ARRO~ HIGHWAY Page 34 - Text - Section G G. CREATE AN OVERALL LANDSCAPED URBAN ENVIRONMENT WHICH IS PERCEIVED AND USED AS A SPECIAL PLACE BY THE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF VICTORIA, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND THE REGION. The special landscape quality of Victoria will be created by using the established vocabulary throughout the new community. The windrow style of planting - trees with a vertical growing habit that are planted in a closely spaced, linear pattern ~ will be found throughout Victoria as "special boulevards", adjacent to utility corridors, and weaving through residential areas as part of the trail system. The naturalized landscape character of Victoria Linear Park is an extension and enrichment of the rustic quality that pervades the planning area. The landscaped boulevard/pedestrian spine in Victoria Arbors is an important new element of the plan that provides the connection between the residential areas and the school/park with the new downtown to the south and the historic winery to the north. Page 37- The Victoria Community Land Use Plan - Revise description THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY LAND USE PLAN On the following pages is the land use plan for the planning area. On this diagram, the integrative open space elements which unify the residential and commercial uses of each village have been illustrated. Victoria Groves, Victoria Vineyards and Victoria Windrows each have a multi-use community facility as the central village amenity. Victoria Linear Park links these open spaces together and provides one continuous pedestr/an and bicycle trail system for the entire community. The terminus of Victoria Linear Park is in the Village of Victoria Arbors, where it connects to a landscaped boulevard/pedestrian spine, which in turn connects the historic winery to the park/school site and ends as a Village Green and Town Square within thc new downtown. This central activity and transportation spine will provide multiple connections. The primary connection is from the restored winery to the downtown. Secondary connections include: residential to residential neight)orhoods: xesidential to the park/school site; and residential to the commercial and regional downtown. As the spine,,a.~r boulevard enters the mixed use area at[offices, restaurants and civic uses 't bec°mes ~~5~z~he linear park then ends at the Town Square~e of the ~-~en~p~-ce corridor, located within th,. new downtown. Access to this open space corridor is provided by a series ofpedestria, trails and is complemented with accented intersections and crosswalks. Page 37- Regional Shopping Square - Change to Regional Downtown and modify description REGIONAL DOWNTOWN The focus of urban activity within the Victoria Community is the regional retail center within Victoria Arbors - an open-air downtown mall surrounded by civic, commercial and residential uses. This downtown will feature retail uses of regional and community interest in the form of a Main Street with a Town Square at the base of the Village Green. This open-air mall and downtown area will feature enhanced pedestrian amenities, pocket parks, a central transportation node, and potentially, a shuttle system from parking lots to "Main Street" and from Main Street to the winery and residential and park uses along the boulevard/pedestrian spine. Surrounding the regional center will be related mixed uses of commercial businesses, offices and residential uses of varying densities. This hierarchy of uses will provide a balance of commemial activities within Victoria and Rancho Cucamonga that encourage a more interesting and diverse city and promote the conservation of energy and natural resources by placing facilities close to people who will be using them. At the time the first development plan is submitted for commercial mixed use or residential mixed use, a Master Plan of development standards and design guidelines shall be established. Page 39 - Graphic - Replace with new Community Plan graphic / -~"'r ........ ~1/ .. ~ Pages 73-100- The Village of Victoria Lal~es- Rename Victoria Arbors; Revise all text, Revise all graphics; all to reflect the newly submitted plan& VICTORIA ARBORS THE VILLAGE OF VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE CONCEPT The Village of Victoria Arbors is multi-use community thematically tied to its historic winery and containing a centrally located neighborhood school/park and an adjacent regional retail downtown. The historic winery at the north of the community will provide the village with its thematic identity, with a "vineyard buffer" that both separates and connects the winery with the village. The village will incorporate landscape references to the viticulture history and incorporate element that mirror "wine country" character in it.,;, streetscapes and entries and will use street names evoking "wine country" and the area's rich agricultural heritage. The design, architecture and choice of materials should work to enforce this theme of "wine country." This character is evoked not only in Rancho Cucamonga's history but in other wine regions, including Napa and Sonoma Valleys, and those of France and other parts of Europe. These areas should be a source of inspiration in design and development of Victoria Arbors. The use of vines on building walls and trellises is encouraged. The use of smooth, hand-trowelled-finish stucco, and stone as building wall material is appropriate. Stone, including cobble, field and quarry, should be included in exterior wall design, alone or in combination with smooth stucco finish. Wrought iron is an appropriate material for use in walls and fencing, gates, trim and balustrades. To solidify the identity of Victoria Arbors, all residential architecture shall incorporate either or both a porch and trellis. These two architectural elements will become an architectural icon for this village. Trellises will be a part of entry monumentatiom street fumiture; and pedestrian ways. Trellises can take many forms including long shaded walkways, building appurtenances, sculptural accents and gazebos. Architectural styles appropriate for residential uses in this village include Monterey, Craftsman, Bungalow and other traditional toms typical of ae:rar/an and viticulture areas. No barrel tile roofing material will be allowed. No Santa Barbara style architecture will be allowed. A Master Plan will be required as part of the first Tentative Map submittal, in compliance with the General Plan and Development Code, which will include more detailed desigu guidelines and exemplary photographs. The residential portion of the village will have a mix of housing types and will b,. oriented around an elementary school, an adjacent neighborhood park, with a multi- purpose building shared with the school, an amphitheater and plaza, and a small wetland.~; park. Victoria Arbors will transition in hierarchy of intensity from the winery and it.,, buffer; to single family residential focussed around the school/park; to multi family residential and mixed commercial/civic/office use; to the regional retail focus: the new down town. The area to the west of Day Creek Boulevard will transition southerly from single family residential to multi-fami? ho,.~sin~all fronted alom,. e Master Plan shall include a dev~ L- concept s~ow~ng a transition of residential land uses and transition ofint_ensity ft,,~ The parcel of land north of Church Street, abutting Etiwanda Avenue is de-annexed from the Etiwanda Specific Plan and becomes part of the Victoria Community Plan. A strip of land, 150 fl. in depth, adjacent to Etiwanda Ave., will be developed with large comparable to those existing on Etiwanda Ave. The homes on these lots will face Et~wanda, but will be accessed fi.om the Victoria Arbors residential area behind th_~___~ Th~s strip of land and its lots will continue to be su~ect to all provisions, developme-'~'-~x] requirements, and design guidelines in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In this way, the integrity of the Etiwanda Specific Plan will be maintained, since Etiwanda Avenue formy the western most visual edge of the Specific Plan area. 10 A generous system of both regional and village-scale trails and walkways with ereenwavs with a central boulevard/pedestrian spine, will provide easy access to the community, the retail area, and recreation/open-space amenities within the village. The ~eenwavs will also provide residents and visitors with pedestrian-scale amenities such as benches, picnic tables and trash receptacles. This trail system will link the village to the adjoining community and a potential shuttle system which will take customers from parking to "Main Street." and could also provide access fi.om the turnaround near the winery to residential neighborhoods and the park, and to the regional downtown. A central transportation node is also planned for the regional downtown to provide access fi.om within and outside of the Village. VILLAGE ENTRIES The major access points to Victoria Arbors will contain large setbacks and generously landscaped entry statements with ties to regional trails (see "Trails and Entry Plan" on following page). The most dramatic entry will be at the northeast comer of the village where Victoria Park Lane enters the community at Base Line Road ("special entry"). Here, the generously landscaped lane will be continued with a thirty-eight foot wide lineal parkway along the west side of Victoria Loop. Within one block, views of the park and wetlands area open to the right as motorists, bicyclists or pedestrians have the option of accessing the park and continuing on to the Day Creek Reg/onal Trail or continuing south along Victoria Loop. Other key intersections in the village are: · maior community entry at Day Creek Blvd. and Base Line Road · residential entry at Day Creek Blvd. and Church St. 11 · residential entry at Church Street and Victoria Loop · residential entries alon:4 Victoria Loop and Day Creek Blvd. at their collectors · commercial entries along Victoria Loop and Day Creek Blvd. At the new downtown entries At these entries, the pedestrian parkways widen to contain village entry signage, restinl,. areas and enhanced landscaping. (Note: Graphics will be provided on entry desitin). (Insert Graphic - Entry Plan) :.., --.'J/" //T~ILS & ZNTRY PLAN / I~1/~ / I! /~ / - ....... ~"'~"~ I ~ /// ~ ~ ~ Da~ Greek Blvd. Scenic & R~croational " / Southorn Pacific R.R.R.O.W (Rails to · ~ / Tmils Program) ~ ~ ! ~ ..................................................................... , --~ / ,,' - - Day Greek Channel Trail VILLAGE EDGES The village edges along Base Line Road, Da,/Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Loop and Foothill Boulevard will feature specially-landscaped linear parkways which provide visual continuity, pedestrian amenities and buffers to adjoining residential uses. Landscaping along Day Creek Boulevard will be consistent with the DaF Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreational Corridor Master Plan. (Insert graphic) ...... The key intersections of Base Line Rd. and Day Creek Blvd., will be consistent with Community Entrance B in the DaF Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreational Corridor Master Plan. HISTORIC WINERY Fundamental to the identity of Victoria Arbors is the historic winery located in the northern portion of the village on Base Line Road. The tradition of viticulture in Cucamonga Valley dates back to the mid-1800s with the introduction of Spanish grapes first grown at the San Gabriel Mission. By the turn of the century, there were forty-five Existing Joseph Fillipi Winery Building wineries in the valley, and the Ellena Brothers founded the subiect winery (in Victoria Arbors) in 1917. After 1934, production was changed to wine vinegar sold under the brand name Regina, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared the site a historic '~ is now home to Joseph Fillipi Winery and Vineyards which operates a tasting room, store~ard and wine production. The~' the only two remaining wineries o~ Valley, and, as such, represents a strong cul~sual base upon~sidential Existing Joseph Fillipi Winery and Vineyards Tasting Room and Store Victoria Arbors will use the viticulture theme in its village identity, including street names, signage, streetscape and monument landscaping. The winery is tied to Victoria Arbors by a boulevard with a wide pedestrian island terminating in a formally landscaped turnaround with water feature. This pedestrian island ~i~ontain demonstration vineyards and viticulture/agriculture displays and landscaping, as well as a trail and rest areas with benches and a gazebo. However, the major entrance to the winery is located on Base Line Rd., in order to prevent disruption and inconvenience to nearby residents. 15 With a demonstration vineyard, a store, tasting room, wine production and a strone visual presence, the winery will be the thematic focal point for the village. It is possible in th~: future that historic homes, machinery and products related to the history of the area and its viticulture may be moved onto the winery site. PUBLIC PARK AND WETLANDS AREA A key amenity in the Village of Victoria Arbors is its centrally located neighborhood park and wetlands park area adjacent to the school site. The seven and a half acre park i~ Illustration of Neighborhood Park, Wetlands and Elementary School (Illustration only; Final design may differ) 16 D~)~) course/circuit, picnic ~ay area and parking for at least thirty-five cars. It wi.~ll.~glY~ the elementary school's multi-purpose building. J An added feature will be a restored wetland park, situated as a diagonal spine into the park, potentially containing trails, walkways and educational exhibits. The wetlands will contain examples of flora and fauna typical to the region and kept secure by an open, wrou~ht-iron fence. Due to its location along the regional trail network, the park and wetlands area will serve residents from adioining areas as well as from Victoria Arbors. Those traveling north or south along Victoria Loop/Park Lane or east or west through the village will pass directly by the park, and many will be drawn in. The recreational amenities of the park include both active and passive uses and therefore appeal to alt ages. DOWNTOWN OPEN SPACE The landscaped boulevard/pedestrian island becomes a Village Green as it leaves the single family residential area and enters the mixed use area of attached residential, retail and civic uses. The Village Green is a wider linear park containing recreational uses as well as trails and street furniture. This Green terminates in Downtown at a Town Center. The Town Center is the most urban of the public spaces in the Village, and will be a hardscaped gathering area for the community and for shoppers visiting downtown. 17 D ~0 ~--] In addition, there will be several pocket parks in the downtown area, at intersections and in pedestrian circulation "eddies." These small green spaces will provide rest areas and serve to soften the shopping environment. TRAIL SYSTEM A key element to the Village of Victoria Arbors is its extensive trail system, oriented both to the region and to the village itself. The entire trail system, described earlier, serve~ three major purposes: ,, links Victoria Arbors to surrounding communities, regional trails and proposed commercial uses surrounds and buffers the village with linear parkways containing walkways, pedestrian amenities and theme landscaping 18 Base Line Road Use WINERY 9.46 AC. Single Family glixed Use Single Family 4-6/Acre 4-6/Acre Single Family 4-6/Acre Mixed Use Single Family 4-8/Acre 'Single Family 4-10/Acre ~/~ ~ Single FamilY4.6/Acre Mixed Single Fatr~ly 4-10/Acre . Mediam High II II Il ~ The Village of Commercial Commercial Victoria Arbors Foothill Blvd. ~ Illustrative Concept Plan provides convenient access to the villaee's park. school, wetlands area and winer'F as well as a direct connection to the new downtown area The Victoria Park Lane Community Trail enters the village at Base Line Road and continues south along Victoria Loop until connecting to the park/school/wetlands site. From here it continues west, meeting the landscaped boulevard/pedestrian spine of the village. Users of the tr/al can continue west crossing the spine and through a small residential nei~_.hborhood to link up with the Day Creek Blvd. Scenic/Recreational Corridor trail system; or travel south along the spine to the regional downtown mall; or travel north a short distance to the historic winery. The DaF Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreational Corridor with its regional trail system continues north of Base Line Road, past the Foothill Freeway connection to the Etiwana~ North Trail System. It continues south past Foothill Boulevard to Jack Benny Drive to ,q trail connecting to the Epicenter Stadium and adult sports park. .~'..:,- ~.-. ~; *- .... , ~ .... , ~ ........... Int~a]lg, the ~ai] ~d walkway s~stem provides convenient and safe access to the school and park sites with widened sidewalks provided along fe~er s~eets. Internal street partes with their many cul-de-sacs provide that children can walk to ~e school and park on a trail s~stem with minimal street crossings. ]n addition, al several impo~t DTO intersections, pedestrian walkwavs are provided through blocks to link to the regional trail system. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE IN VICTORIA ARBOR S There will be a mix of housing types provided in Victoria. This single-family housing is oriented around the school and park sites and is consistent with the family nature of the village and adiacent residential areas to the west, north and east. Multi family housing wilt provide a transitional use between the single family residential and commercial and civic uses. Multi Family residential will be provided west of Day Creek Boulevard, which will be fronted along the Boulevard by mixed use. This mix of housing types will provide more choices to future residents and is consistent with planned and adjacent uses. The following residential land use densities are planned: · L - low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) · LM - low-medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) · MH - medium-high (14-24 dwelling units per acre) · H - high (24-30 dwelling units per acre) TRANSITION OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ~--~~/~~ Residential density will transition from the more rural area around the winery and vineyards to the north, to smaller and attached homes near the new downtown in the south. Due to the more rural character and a family orientation, low-medium densiW housing will be the most common use in the north half of the village. The extensive use of cul-de- sacs will provide safe public space for children and necessitate some variation in lot sizes and configuration. A row of large 14,000 square foot lots will front on Etiwanda Avenue to conform to other large lots that exist along this rural street. All homes which back onto major arterial and secondary highways will be buffered with a landscaped slop~ easement and wall. Medium and medium-high residential uses will occur in the residential mixed use area adjacent to the down town. This area will include attached residential, retail, office and civic uses. It will create an exciting, urban living environment that will form a symbiotic: relationship with the downtown, extending activities into the evenings. Additional medium~high density and possibly high density senior housing will occur west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Chureh Street, behind a strip of mixed use area. This strip of mixed uses may include attached residential and/or retail uses. A Master Plan must be prepared as part of the first development plan submittals for -mea-:"-'m 2na_ medium high residential uses and mixed retail/office/residential uses. Thi.~ o~arS~:lrdPeln;~al~ ial~2nI~;~de; ;edt~lse~eP?ent (~ use)co~ REGIONAL CENTER IS URBAN FOCUS FOR VICTORIA The new downtown will be the commercial focus of Victoria and of the region, extending beyond the City of Rancho Cucamonga to include western San Bernadino County. It is important that this center fulfill its role as the active terminus of the community-wide open space system and as an outstanding reg/onal com~_merf4al~fa_cility' To accomplish these goals, the regional center will be designed as ~f-oo~er~-!*_h a downtown, Main Street concept. An array of department stores~ civic uses will be complemented with attractive public spaces includin~~illage Cireen which culminates in an urban square - the Town Square. This combination of gather/ng/recreating spaces and the trail system which connects the regional center to the community will make this downtown a unique place that will function as the focus of the Village of Victoria Arbors and the retail heart of Rancho Cucamonga The regional center will be surrounded by civic, mixed use and multi-family residential uses which will serve to support the retail uses. Furthermore, the open space corridor - in the form of the village's landscaped boulevard/pedestrian way - will conveniently draw both village residents and visitors from outside Victoria Arbors - into the heart of the downtown. Once there, visitors will enjoy a great variety of activities from shopping to eating to strolling to relaxing. The open 2ir 7.:a,, ,~,~,~ l,,,ai,, oL, eet will provide a lively street scene with both regional and specialty retail and commercial/office uses complemented with restaurants and service commercial. Pedestrian-friendly amenities along the downtown streets will include pocket parks, outdoor restaurants, benches, accented paving and specialized landscaping. PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND MASS TRANSIT The Village of Victoria Arbors will accommodate several levels of public transportation. A shuttle system could operate within the retail area taking visitors from parking facilities located in peripheral areas of the commercial center to the ~a.~his same shuttle could operate along/he north/south vill.ag,~e_,p~an way/boulevard, going from the winery to the park and to tb~-~'~,i*, c,,~,~.t .Mv~ ~ea This local public transit would serve residents of Victoria Arbors as well as provide a direct physical connection of the winery to the new downtown. In addition, this regional downtown will contain a central trans~ortalicm no~de,--f-ar vublic buses to se~e not only t~he Villa~,e~buLals~o the reeion. ,~ *= COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Victoria Community Plan will provide specific facilities to meet community needs. These facilities will be convenient to village residents and will minimize dependence on facilities outside the community. These facilities include schools, parks, trails and community-serving retail in village commercial centers and the new downtown area. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Parks and open space have been integrated into the community to form the character and identity of each individual village, as well as Victoria as a whole. This will be accomplished by locating park and community facilities at the center of each village, connecting the residential areas to the central facilities via an extensive trail system, and then connecting each village open space through the Victoria Linear Park. Village parks in residential areas will be large enough to accommodate facilities for use by all village residents. Placing parks next to school playgrounds and facilities will also maximize efficient use of community open space. There is a wide variety of open spaces in the Village of Victoria Arbors. In addition to the extensive trails and parkways described earlier, the village has a 7.5 acre neighborhood park, a 1.5 acre restored wetland park, a demonstration vineyard/buffer area between the restored winery and residential area, and a prominent, north/south open space corridor that extends from the winery into the heart of the downtown mall. This greenway consists of an extensively landscaped boulevard with a wide median strip with a trail that extends from the formal turnaround near the winery to the beginning of the mixed use area near the reg/onal downto, wn~.~,is point and continuing south, the corridor becomes a Village Green fa cuv~r~l ndscaped spine with internal pathways and park uses - and terminates in an urban square - the Town Square, located on the downtown Main Street. With this variety of open space and park amenities, the Village of Victoria Arbors provides many recreational opportunities for both residents and visitors. The park, adjacent to the landscaped boulevard, will be easily accessible to nearby residents but is also located along the regional trail system. The adjoining wetlands park is also along the regional trail system from Victoria Park Loop. More urban public space can be found w~tmn me a,~,,,,,~,,,n, -~ ....,_r M2.. '.':!~.. its Town Square and pocket parks located alon~ the main commercial streets. SCHOOLS Schools have been planned for Victoria to complement and reinforce the open space system. They will be located close to the village parks in residential neighborhoods, and access by foot or bicycle via the trail system is assured. Joint use of school facilities for broad community needs will be encouraged to make the schools a hub of activity for village activities. These goals are thoroughly implemented in Victoria Arbors. The ten-acre elementary school is adiacent to the park and accessible by car, bus, shuttle, bicycle or on foot. The school is just off the regional trail system which enters the village from the north at Victor/a Park Loop and is directly adioining the trail which runs east from the boulevard/open space corridor. The school's central location within the village and its inclusion in a central open space with a park and restored wetlands site give it ;~ prominent and efficient location with unique recreational and educational opportunities. CHURCHES Churches can be accommodated in the Village of Victoria Arbors in the following ways: a. Shared facilities at local schools. Though this is not a suitable permanent solution, it can serve temporary needs. b. The regional retail area and mixed use areas of the plan, are permissible locations for churches. They can share use of commercial parking during off-hours. c. Condominium churches permit joint use church complexes and a reduced land cost for church groups. Such innovative use and plans are encouraged within the villages. CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES Within the Villages of the Victoria Community Plan, many elements have been structured to provide for the conservation of resources. This will be accomplished in the following ways. USE WATER FOR PLANT MATERIALS WHERE THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS MOST Water will be conserved wherever possible by using low maintenance or drought tolerant plant material. Conserving water in naturalized areas will allow the use of water where it will be most needed for more intense community use, such as in parks and water features. The parks and schools, therefore, will have some extensive lawn areas which require require regular watering. EXTENSIVE TRAIL SYSTEM ENCOURAGES USE OF BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS Trail systems work best where they connect the community residents to the places they use most. The trial system in Victoria is extensive and will provide the connections that provide the best options for residents and visitors. Direct access is provided to local parks and schools, to village commercial centers, to regional trails and open space and to other villages. On a regional level, connections will be made to the community's major commercial centers, to the developing industrial center and to neighboring Terra Vista. The Village of Victoria Arbors provides pedestrians and bicyclists an array of choice~ that do not necessitate use ora car. In addition to the regional trail system that enters thc village from the north at Victoria Park ~edestrians and bicyclists can travel along the median strip of the landscaped boulevard as they move south towards the downtown commercial area. Once arriving at the mixed use area, the pedestrian pathways continue through the Village Green and terminate at the downtown mall area in a Town Square. The extensive system of inter-village trails and walkways also provide access to the park, school and wetlands park. A shuttle system is possible for inter-village travel, going from the turnaround near the winery, accessing the school and park, and ending within the downtown regional mall area. The shuttle system would be coordinated with a parking facility in the new downtown so that people can leave their vehicles and use the village transit. This interconnected trail system combined with a shuttle will reduce automobile traffic and improve air quality. Page 105, 111 - Statistical Summary - Revised to reflect current submittal SUMMARY OF LAND USE ACREAGE The following acreage figures represent the proportions devoted to each land use as shown on the Land Use Plan. These calculations are based on current plans and are subject to corrections based on more refined data as it is available, LAND USE ACREAGE TABLE I. Commercial Current Acres Ammended ,4eres Regional Center 100 97 Regional Related Commemial 200 82 Village Commercial Centers 35 35 Mixed Use - Commercial/Civic 0 44 Winery 0 15 2. Community Facilities Current Acres Ammended Acres Schools 40 50 3. Parks, Lakes and Community Trails Current Acres Ammended Acres Village Parks (The Groves, The Vineyards, The Windrows, including lake in Windrows Park,and Victoria Arbors Neighborhood Park) 40 42.5 Village Parks in Victoria Arbors (Including Wetlands Park, Winery Buffer, Regional Trails, and Greenways - not including any open space in the Regional Center 20 9.5 Victoria Linear Park (not including paved area of Victoria Parkway 35 36.5 Community Trails (not including Victoria Arbors) 5 5 4. Unimproved Open Space CurrentAcres AmmendedAcres Day Creek Channel; Flood Control Basin; 125 125 Southern Pacific Right-of-way 25 25 Southern California Edison (West ofDaycreek Blvd) 85 85 Southern California Edison (East of Daycreek Blvd) 85 0 5. Roads Cttrrent Acres Ammended Acres Milliken, Highland, Baseline, Foothill, Day Creek Boulevard and Paved area Of Victor/a Parkway (pavement width) 120 120 6. Residential Land Uses 955 I ,270 (Including Mixed Use Residential in Victoria Arbors Total Planned Community 1,870 1,993.5 Land within Planning Area Not a Part of Planned Community 280 164.5 Total Planning Area Acreage 2,130 2,158 APPROACH TO RESIDENTIAL DENSITY The Land Use Plan fbr Victoria Contains six different kinds of residential land use designation. As described in the plan, each residential land use designation will contain a variety of housing types at various densities that are compatible with that land use designation. Generally, the types of housing products allowed within a given land use area will be in a specific density range. These density ranges are summarized in the following chart: RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RANGES Low Density Single Family attached and detached homes on 2-4 Dwelling units per large lots, or clustered to maximize the effective Adjusted Gross Acre use of open space Medium DensitF Single family attached and detached homes on lots 4-8 du/A varying from 3,000 SF to 7,200 SF Medium DensitF Attached single family homes, including duplexes, 8-14 du/A fourplex/condominiums, townhomes (fi'ont and rear loaded) and condominiums. Detached homes may be possible at the lower end of the density range. High Densi~ Multifamily homes; typically a 3 story building with 24-30 du/A covered and uncovered parking THE OPTIMUM YIELD CONCEPT Although a density range is a useful tool in determining the upper and lower quantity of residential units proposed for any land use, it is misleading to use as the precise guide in determining the actual number of dwelling units within any specific village or land use category when both the City and its developers must commit a certain level of expenditures to implement the plan. Therefore, the method of dealing with density in this plan is based upon a realistic understanding of units which are necessary to provide the amenities described, the infrastructure needed, and the demands of the housing market. This number of units. Or optimum yield, has been established for each village as an optimum number of units for that area based on the residential and community uses within that village. This planning approach provides density control, allows future flexibility, and establishes a realistic allowance for planning infrastructure. The key is to provide enough units of housing to assure housing needs can be met from local employment growth at prices locally employed workers can afford. A REALISTIC APPROACH TO RESIDENTIAL DENSITY Several reasons point to the optimum yield approach: First, simply using the density range as a multiplier for each respective land use acreage produces a numerical range of dwelling units that is artificially skewed on both high and Iow ends. The high end numbers of dwelling units assumes that every land use category could be developed at the maximum density allowable. This does not reflect the intention of the developer nor market needs which must be met over a long period of time. Initially, lower density will be needed most, but as the area matures, much of the housing required to meet the City's needs will have to be met by attached housing. The low number of dwelling units is also unrealistic in that it would force prices too high, and thereby not allow the developer to meet the need for housing generated by the expanding local employment base. The optimum yield approach proposes an optimum number of units based on a sound understanding of what could reasonably be built on this site, retaining benefits both for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the developcrs over a long period of time. This assumes a balance between short and long term needs for housing: In the short term, a majority of detached houses; in the long term, a majority of attached ownership houses. The optimum yield allows for adequate infrastructure planning and commitments to open space and recreational facilities. Other amenities and necessities can be properly sized and space allocated. Second, there are actual housing types that yield specific residential densities within the density range of each land use category which are most realistic. For example, category "LM", single family residential, includes products that yield from 4.5 du/acre to 6.8 du/acre. In determining the expected yield of dwelling units, these different products have been allocated throughout the "LM", category land use areas to provide a mix which represents today's best understanding of present and future market demand, and to provide the mixture of housing opportunities specified in the Rancho Cucamonga Proposed General Plan. HOW THE OPTIMUM YIELD METHOD WORKS Using the system outlined above, a specific number of dwelling units has been established for each of the Villages and for the total community. Those numbers are shown on the Density Distribution Plan. Developing the indicated number of units for each Village makes possible the amount of open space and other amenities indicated by the Land Use Plan and in the Land Use Acreage Summary. OPTIMUM YIELD BY LAND USE The optimum yield according to each land use is listed in the following chart: Land Use/Density Range Acres Optintal [?eld "L" Low Density 2-4 du/A 297 832 Units "LM" Low Medium Densi .ty 4-8 du/A 616 3,511 Units "M" Medium Density 8-14 du/A 199 2,184 Units "MH" Medium High Density -14-24 du/a 126 2,457 Units "H" High Density 24-30 du/A 32 920 Units TOTALS 1,270 9,909 Units OPTIMUM YIELD AS A PLANNING TOOL The optimum yield can be used as a planning tool by the City and the developers to determine the need and size of infrastructure, schools, community facilities, and public utilities. It can be used as the basis for projecting furore population. Using an optimum yield of 8,047 dwelling units allocated in the manner described in this plan, the future population of Victoria can be summarized as follows: 32 Residential Persons Per Dwelling Population CategorF Household Units Proiections "L" Low Density 3.4 832 2,829 "LM' Low Medium Density 3.4 3,511 11,937 "M" Medium Density 1.5 2,189 3,284 "MH" Medium High Density 1.5 2,457 3,686 "H" High Density 1.5 920 1 ~380 TOTALS 9,909 23,116 Page 151 - Text- Entry Hierarchy ENTRY HIERARCHY The Entry Hierarchy Plan (To be Revised) on the following pages shows the locations where a special landscape treatment should mark an entry into Victoria. Generally, trees and other plants should be the dominant elements of these entry statements. Large conspicuous monuments and signs are not appropriate for these permanent entry treatments, though temporary signs may be necessary during development, and are permitted. Page 152 - 153 - Graphics- Change Victoria Arbors portion of the 2''a Entry Hierarchy Platt. Use legend fi'om Ist Plan & Combine with Trails Plan (See Page 12) Page 154- Graphics - Redraw Plant Palette Plan. Page 155- Graphics - Change Victoria Arbors portion of the Plant Palette Plan. Page 157- Graphics- Change Typical Edge Conditions section for Day Creek Boulevard to be consi~ent with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreational Corridor Master Plan Page 242 - Graphics - Redraw Standard Road Cross-Sections Reference Plan & Legend Page 243 - Graphics - Change Victoria Arbom Portion of the Standard Road Cross Section Reference Plan 34 EXISTING LAND USE FOR VICTORIA LAKES LM LM NE LM ~ (ESP) ~ ESP) --OOTH ILL LEGEND CF = Community Facility H= High Residential LM = Low-Medium Residential M = Medium Residential MH = Medium-High Residential MU = Mixed Use OP = Office Park OS = Open Space RC = Regional Center RR = Regional Related Commercial VC = Village Commercial ,~ Project boundary Village boundary -~PA 98-02 /CPA 98-01 ;SPA 98-01 & --XHIBIT 'E' ~ PROPOSED LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS 'SPRR ~ LM bM (ESP) ~ MU (~ .;I-I 0 LL LEGEND -=i'i~ H= High Residential · LM = Low-Medium Residential ~' M = Medium Residential MH = Medium-High Residential MU = Mixed Use ,~: i:~ OS = Open Space ~' :: RC = Regional Center ~ii: RR = Regional Related Commercial ARR ~ VC = Village Commercial ,./~.. Project boundary Village boundary -~PA 98-02 /CPA 98-01 =-SPA 98-01 --XHIBIT 'F' 3 .... : ' CIRCULATION PLAN ~ i COLLECTOR J .,.. .......... , ,. .' .... ~ /-~ i [ ~!- ~ . .... · J I [ , i MAJOR ARTERIAL [ . .. '__l, I i' MAJOR DIVIDED J I .............................. '=~ ARTERIAL .......... PROPOSED INTERCHANGE ~ ' , ' ~ I ''" ' ~ ~ FRE~AY INTERCHANGE -'"h --~ .~ ~ ::: : ........ / ~' J ~TE.SECTION FOR ........ '~ ........ '.,,i,,. ~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD ........... mk ~ ~.-" ~ l ~ '"' ' ' "- ~ SPECIAL DESIGN " ~ J L---.] SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE ........., ............ ............... ' ~, ~ . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 98-02 VCPA 98-01 ESPA 98-01 Exhibit "Gl" __ III- 6 i ' · ,"-". ......... -, ......... ~ ..... -'T_ ...... :_'. . -- -- --.. · ! i ! ~ I ~'' -~2,..~,Z*~..,.,,, ,,,~.~.. ..................... · .q '- i ~ ' ,, . ', I PARKS AND ,! ? L ? 'i' ' ' .. .... -- ',' ,, I RECREATION PLAN · ' "'" "-'~ A ~ i ~ .'"-"" ~ ' ' , ' I i ~!" " I I' "' ",~ '"" ''~ ~l ~ ParKs · . . ,:! ,';~1 '" . : .... ~x':cl"- '- , ~ PROPOSED PARKS ..... ~ ,] · ' '- . EXISTING PARKS ' ~i , ~ ; "~ I~'7 i" ' - '", FLOATING DESIGNATION ,' /;x; ,,\ ~s ; ' ',. '. ',' ~ ~: I ~ I SCHOOLS* ~ , ~ EXISTING SCHOOLS / ~ PROPOSED SCHOOLS I~'-- ~ ~" : '- ,' ~ SPECIAL USE FACILITY ~ - " " PARKS GPA 98-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VCPA 98-01 ....... ESPA 98-01 ~ .~,~. '"'~ Exhibit "G2" Mixed Uae ~ NAP ~ Single Family ~ ~ 4-6/Acre ............. Temple PrOl~V0. VCPA 98-01 ~-~..~:~ ESPA 98-01 '"' ' ~"-'"' '~ ' ' -'- ~ ~1~~~ Exhibit "H" Regional Master Plan ~-~.~ PDS Wes~t Concept F- 10-25-00 Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting October 11, 2000 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:15 p.m. The meeting was moved from the Council Chamber to the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner; Brad Bullet, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - An overview of the land use and village concept for a proposed project known as the Victoria Arbors Village on approximately 420 acres in the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Day Creek Channel to the west, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south- APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31, 33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31,33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25; and 227-211- 40. Brad Buller, City Planner, gave an overview of the purpose of the workshop. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. John Morfisette, American Beauty Development Co., explained to the Commission the different levels of entitlements that they hoped to achieve. He then turned it over to Bob Lacoss for a design presentation. Bob Lacoss, PDS West, described the village concept to the Commission. Chairman McNiel opened the meeting for discussion. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the grades are taken up by the project. He also asked whether the wetland could be eliminated. Mr. Morhsette responded that the grading issue was still not resolved and will be addressed with the submission of the Tentative Maps. He also noted that the Corps of Engineer may consider removal if it could be demonstrated that avoidance of removing the wetland was found to be impractical. Commissioner Tolstoy thought the wetland might not be good for the neighborhood. He also felt there should be a trail along Chumh Street. Mr. Bullet stated that one aspect of the workshop was to look at the imagery of product types prepared by the applicant and provide feedback. He said another aspect was to look at the central spine street and the winery buffer and maintenance issues of the open space elements as proposed. Joey Filippi, Filippi Winery, indicated that he agreed with the winery buffedng shown on the concept and how it connects with the central spine street. Commissioner Macias responded that the maintenance of the vineyards within the winery buffeting area must be practical for the City. He suggested that the City, the applicant, and Filippi Winerywork together to balance the need for buffedng and the maintenance cost. Commissioner Mannerino believed that vineyards around the winery were appropriate but was against having vineyards along the paseos of the central spine street. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that vineyards should not be within the paseos of the central spine street and that the City should not have to maintain vineyards in any park setting. Chairman McNiel agreed. Mr. Bullet then requested discussion on residential uses. Commissioner Mannedno stated that he would like to see the central spine street straight. He indicated that the proposed Mixed Use must include a definition of the uses allowed. He said he would like to see that the paseo along the central spine street tell the winery stories. He thought that Church Street should connect to Etiwanda Avenue. Commissioner Stewart agreed with Commissioner Mannedno regarding the opportunity to tell the history of wine making along the central spine street. She stated that the pictures and the imageries of the housing products must be real in terms of the level of amhitectural elements and details provided to the products. She stressed the need for sufficient parking to be provided for people to visit the paseos along the spine street. Commissioner Macias expressed the need for quality of amenities within the village and the need to preserve the winery. He agreed with the comments made by Commissioners Mannedno and Stewart. Chairman McNiel expressed his concerns with small lots (5 to 6,000 square feet) and the garage- scape that typically come with that size of lots. He suggested that the residential village should look at innovative lot design such as wide and shallow lots. He reminded the applicant that the village must have an up-scale design to it. The Consensus of the Commission was to review additional information on lots and housing products at the October 25 meeting. PC Adjourned Minutes -2- '~)(~ October 11, 2000 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting October 25, 2000 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel ABSENT: Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner; Bred Bullet, City Planner; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Nancy Fong, Senior Planne~, Debra Meier, Contract Planner; Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer OLD BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA 'SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - An overview of the land use and village concept for a proposed project known as the Victoria Arbors Village on approximately 420 acres in the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Day Creek Channel to the west, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south -APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31, 33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25; and 227-211- 40. Brad Bullet, City Planner, gave a recap of the October 11, 2000, workshop. John Morrisette, American Beauty Development Co., stated that they had taken the Commission's comments to heart and increased the width of the smallest lots from 50 to 53 feet. He then turned it over to Bob Lacoss for design presentation. Bob Lacoss, PDS West, described the seven alternatives of plotting houses, an example of a residential block with the alternative house plotting, and a typical street-scene with the house design. Mr. Bullet clarified to the Commission that the applicant was looking for a consensus on supporting a Mixed Use zoning, and the concept of the residential lot pattern as shown in the illustrative concept plan. He stated that the next level of review by the Commission was the Master Plan, which would have details of the subdivision and the housing products design. Mr. Morrisette clarified to the Commission that they would be coming back with a Development Agreement and would like to have a flexibility of the density range of 5 to 10 units per acre for the planning area at the northeast comer of Future Victoria Loop Road and Church Street. Chairman McNiel opened the meeting for discussion. Chairman McNiel opened the meeting for discussion. Commissioner Mannedno liked the concepts of the seven house plotting alternatives. He raised a concern regarding shared garage walls. Commissioner Macias agreed that he too liked the concept of the house plotting but said he would be looking for the details to be reviewed at the Master Plan level. He supported the Mixed Use zone. Chairman McNiel liked the concept as well and the mix of 5,300 square foot lots with the larger ones. He expressed concerns regarding increasing the density range to 5 to 10 units per acre. Mr. Buller summarized the conceptual support from the Commissioners present for the altematives presented. He noted that the concepts presented would next be seen in greater detail with the Master Plan and/or the Development Agreement for the project. PC Adjourned Minutes -2- ~ ~ October 25, 2000 ALTERNATIVE t ALTERNATIVE 2 ALTERNATIVE 3 I L -, ,--- GPA 98-02 ...... ~_..,. VCPA 98-01 //~LTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 4 ALTERNATIVE S ESPA 98-01 BUILDING CONCEPTS Exhibit "d" VictofiaArbors- Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Arbors Rancho Cucamonga ,~.pDs._.W_es.t. Alternative Building concepts on 53ft. X lOO ft. Lots Building Alternatives Area 7 - .55 ft. X 100' Lots ~'ictoria Arbors - Rancho Cucamonga UCAMONGA 220 LP- 16380 Venmra Blvd., Suite 401- Enc ino, CA 91436 ~ (4~ ~ PDS West RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW-MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment 98-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the City. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption c' this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said properly is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoria Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and is undeveloped. c. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "A," modifying the Circulation Element to extend Victoria Park Lane, and modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "B" to the proposed City Council resolution. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 98-02 as shown in the attached City Council resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 3 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW- MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND MAKING CHANGES TO THE CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment 98-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the city. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 7. On 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial, and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The properly to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoda Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and is undeveloped. c. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exh b t A, mod fy ng the C rculat~on E ement to extend V~ctona Park Lane, and modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 98-02 subject to the condition set forth below. Planninq Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sote expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for the Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PROPOSED LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS NE ~ LM LM 'Mi LM ~: (ESP) u~ MU ~,H FOOTH LL LEGEND · .. H= High Residential ~i:~ LM = Low-Medium Residential ,~!!i M = Medium Residential ~ MH = Medium-High Residential ~iO~S MU = Mixed Use OS = Open Space ~. RC = Regional Center ~ RR = Regional Related Commercial · ': VC = Village Commercial ,,~,, Project boundary Village boundary .~ PA 98-02 /CPA 98-01 :-SPA 98-01 --XHIBIT 'A' ...... ~ ..... ~ ~ Figure III- 3 I ~ ~ ' CIRCULATION PLAN '-] '. ....... i ; i , ..o.w, i; .y' i COLLECTOR :. ~ :::::: ....... d~ MAJOR ARTERIAL / ' * ..... . ' -~- Z.' ~.-i.__ ~ \: ~ -.Z MAJOR DIVIDED , , ......... ~ · EXISTING INTERCHANGE -~ .......... 'i1' ..... 'i~ ...... O PROPOSED INTERCHANGE ' '--': ' ~ ~ (~) FREBWAY INTERCHANGE ~ ~ ~C:: -- ~°l h~l~l~ ~ _~: = ~ :~4,-- FR£EWAY TO FREEW&Y, NO LOCAL ACCIESS -,-/ .' II GRADE SEPARATION : :: - o ! INTERSECTION FOR ........... r.{ ~ ~ "~ ~-- SPECIAL BOULEVARD : ~ SPECIAL DESIGN ._~ " ~ [--~----] SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE : !i  ,,. i ~ VCPA 98-0 -- -- ESPA 98-0 ~__~ hibit C,TY oP RA.C.O CUCAMONGA ~ ~ EX "B" II1-~ i ? ......... ~ ........... ~ i-'~' ................ ~'.- ~o~o,. ................. ~ , ......... , · , .~- ,, ~ PARKS AND .... · ,, ...... R£CR£ATION .- '-. , ',, PLAN " ' A A,, .... .. .-~--.--.-.~,, ~.. -. ,,.~ _... ', ;; i PARKS ~, ' -- "~" -=-~'~- ..... -~ I ~ PROPOSED PARKS ;4 ........ ,.- .:! .. . r ....., --I..m EX~ST~.G PARKS / "~ ,' ~ ' ~ L~ FLOATING DESIGNATION · ,.\ ..: ~ ; ,~j ~ '. .,. .: , , ...... I ~ I I SCHOOLS* ' , ~ EXISTING SCHOOLS " ' ~ PROPOSED SCHOOLS ;-' '. / ~ SPECIAL USE FACILITY __~ " PARKS " I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 CHANGING THE ZONING FROM LOW-MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 205.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VARIOUS CHANGES TO THE TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 20, 22, AND 23; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. Amedcan Beauty Development Co. filed an application for Victoda Community Plan Amendment 98-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the city. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said headng on that date. 7. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng on November 8, 2000, including wdtten and oral staffreports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 a. The application applies to approximately 205.8 acres of land, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoda Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The properly to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial, and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoda Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and is undeveloped. c. The applicant contemplates changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" of the City Council Ordinance, and modify vadous text and graphics of the Victoria Community Plan as shown as shown as Exhibit "D" in the staff report. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoda Community Amendment 98-01, changing the land use as shown in Exhibit "A" of the attached City Council Ordinance, various text and graphics changes to the Victoda Community Plan as shown in Exhibit "D" in the staff report and the Conditions of Approval for Victoda Community Plan as shown in the attached City Council Ordinance. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 CHANGING THE ZONING FROM LOW-MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 205.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND APPROVING VARIOUS CHANGES TO THE TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 20, 22, AND 23; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for Victoda Community Plan Amendment 98-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the city. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said headng on that date. 7. On ,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 98-01 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on ,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 205.8 acres of land, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial, and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoda Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses The property to the south is designated Regional Centerand is undeveloped. c. The applicant contemplates changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and modifying various text and graphics of the Victoria Community Plan as shown in Exhibit "D" in the staff report. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Victoda Community Amendment 98-01, changing the land use as shown in and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and amending various text and graphics as shown in Exhibit "D" on the staff report and with conditions as follows: Planninq Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, offices, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2) A Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to or at the time of the submittal of a first residential development. 3) The Master Plan shall include development and design cdteria on the arrangement of residential land use and the proper transition of residential density where higher density, such as condominiums and apartments, will be placed adjacent to or mixed with commercial uses. 4) Add language in the residential portion of the village that require lots under 5,500 square feet to have innovation in subdivision design and housing products. Add references that exhibits of innovative housing products are to be shown in the future Master Plan and shall be followed. 5) Demonstrate how the buffering vineyards south of the winery facility can be privately maintained without burdening City's resources. 6) Provide a strong pedestrian/paseo/trail (30 to 50 feet wide) connection between Victoria Park Lane, at Base Line Road and Victoria Loop Road, to the central spine street. Provide a special treatment for the intersection of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road to redirect the primary pedestrian paseo to the newly created central spine. 7) The central spine street shall be the extension of Victoria Park Lane and resume the planned community concept in its street width (133 to 180 feet) and trail continuation. This central spine street serves as the focal point of the residential portion of the village and connects to the future regional center through an open space village green and square. This central spine street shall have the following elements: reduce CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 4 street pavement as deemed safe by the City Engineer; provide a Class I bike path to one side of the widened parkway; and provide a centralized theme of amenities in the median island, such as, but not limited to, the arbors with a showcase of grape varieties, pedestrian friendly street furniture, water elements, display of art pieces, a minimum width of 40 feet for the medium island, etc. 8) Provide a strong vertical element]landmark, for example, a tall clock tower, at the village green. 9) Within City maintained areas, demonstration vineyards, viticulture and/or agriculture displays, and landscaping is discouraged. Instead, the grove imagery of citrus or other orchard crops can be promoted through formal ornamental tree plantings. 10) Provide a master plan of greenways and paseos for the neighborhood west of Day Creek Boulevard south of future Church Street. 11) The Victoda Community Plan shall be revised according to Exhibit "D" of the staff report, incorporating all Conditions of Approval. The final version of the pertinent pages including statistics, graphics, and sections of the Community Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to or at the time of first residential submittal. Environmental Mitiqation 1 ) Summary of Impacts and Mitigation contained in the Final EIR entitled "Final EIR for GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01" shall apply. 2) Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in the Final EIR entitled "Final EIR for GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 and ESPA 98-01" shall apply. EnRineedng 1) The local circulation plan south of Foothill Boulevard is wrong. It shall be corrected. 2) Church Street offset at Victoria Loop Road has not been approved. Need more detailed studies to resolve Church Street alignment. 3) Collector street designations shall be determined upon submittal of development applications. 4) The street configurations may need realignments for circulation purposes. The right-of-way and curb widths along with the realignments shall be approved by the City Engineer. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 5 5) Circulation and street design shall meet the City criteria and approval by the City Engineer. 6) The various intersection designs shall meet the City criteria and approval by the City Engineer. 7) Provide pedestrian bridges/signals for greenbelt crossings where appropriate. 8) Increase the School/Park area to enlarge the parking lot area for numerous activities, thus reducing street parking and increasing traffic flow. 9) The use of village entdes shall be consistent with the rest of the Victoda Planned Community. If there are no village entries north of Base Line Road, there shall not be any village entries south of Base Line Road. 10) With the many unknowns yet to be determined with the "mall," the concepts presented with this amendment are considered preliminary and should be subject to more detailed analysis, as concepts are refined. Graphics depicting specific design elements, such as vineyards and gazebos, should be omitted until such details are finalized. 11) All City maintained landscaping should conform to Public Works Standards including the maintenance-reducing strategies adopted by City Council, which requires the use of rockscape. 12) Landscaping along major streets such as Base Line Road, Day Creek Boulevard, and Church Street/Miller Avenue should incorporate established beautification themes. 5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. PROPOSED LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS 'SPRR NE ~ LM LM LM ~ (ESP) ~ MU 0 LL LEGEND ~:::::" H= High Residential ~i!7! LM = Low-Medium Residential ~!;~: M = Medium Residential MH = Medium-High Residential MU = Mixed Use .:~ :: ::i i OS = Open Space ~i';i RC = Regional Center · :::: RR = Regional Related Commercial ~:~': VC = Village Commercial ~_ Project boundary o~'Village boundary ~PA 98-02 fCPA 98-01 !SPA 98-01 ".XHIBIT 'l' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-171-11, 12 AND 25. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Amendment 98-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the City. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public headng and concluded said headng on that date. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public heating on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 27 acres of land, located at the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Office Professional; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential and Office Professional, and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with a temple. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium and Medium-High Residential, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with an office building. The property to the south is designated Regional Related Office/Commercial and is undeveloped. c. The applicant contemplates changing the subject site to Mixed Use. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01, amending the land use from Office Professional to Mixed Use, subject to the conditions as shown in the attached City Council Ordinance. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November8,2000 Page 3 A'iq'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-171-11, 12 AND 25. A. Recitals. 1. Amedcan Beauty Development Co. filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Amendment 98-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the city. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said headng on that date. 7. On ., 2000, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucemonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on 2000, including written and oral staff repot[s, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 2 a. The application applies to approximately 27 acres of land, located at the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential and Office Professional, and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with a temple. The property to the west is designated Low -Medium and Medium-High Residential, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with office building. The property to the south is designated Regional Related Office/Commercial and is undeveloped. c. The applicant contemplates changing the subject site to Mixed Use. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01, changing the land use from Office Professional to Mixed Use, subject to the following conditions: Planninq Division 1 ) A Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to or at the time of submittal of the first residential development. 2) The Master Plan shall show lot design that complies with the development and design standards contained in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. ,~,,) ~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 3 3) Provide illustrations of plotting of housing products for lots along Etiwanda Avenue. Environmental Mitiqation 1 ) Summary of Impacts and Mitigation contained in the Final EIR entitled "Final EIR for GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01" shall apply. 2) Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in the Final EIR entitled "Final EIR for GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01" shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __ DAY OF 2000. THE CITY OF I~ANCHO Cl]CAHONGA SmffRe r DATE: November 8, 2000 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the name of Victoria Lakes village to Victoria Arbors village within the Victoria Community Plan. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment from American Beauty Development Company to change the design direction of a major portion of this village requires that we consider changing the name of the entire village. American Beauty proposes eliminating the lakes aspect of the project and introducing elements that will reflect our vintner heritage. Staff believes that this new concept will be a positive image for the entire village and would support the change in name and the new design direction. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A change in name for a village within a planned community is not a project; therefore, not subject to environmental review per section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Victoria Lakes/Arbors Village Boundary Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council Proposed Ordinance ITEM E VICTORIA LAKES/VICTORIA ARBORS LM LM NE LM ~- (ESP) '~ OP .~H 0 FOOTH LL LEGEND H= High Residential LM = Low-Medium Residential M = Medium Residential MH = Medium-High Residential MU = Mixed Use OS = Open Space RC = Regional Center RR = Regional Related Commercial VC = Village Commercial ~/~. Project boundary Village boundary VCPA 00-04 EXHIBIT 'A' ~-- ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE NAME OF VICTORIA LAKES VILLAGE TO VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE WITHIN VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 8,, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 8, 2000 Page 2 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoda Community Plan Amendment No. 00-04. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: LarTy T. McNiel. Chairman ATTEST: Bred Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY pLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE NAME OF VICTORIA LAKES VILLAGE TO VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE WITHIN VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Distdct Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On November ~, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 00- , recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. 3. On ,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded sand hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on ,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Victoda Community Plan Amendment No. 00-04. 5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. RECEIVED: 11- 6- O; 5:2tPM; 760 431 9624 => R CUCAIJONGA COM DEV; ~2 11/08/00 17:26 FA,[ 760 431 9624 US FISH ~ND WILDLIFE ~002/003 ~ United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological 'Services Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office -~730 Loker Avenue 'Crc,l: Carlsbn~, Cnlifor~t 92008 Brent Le Count Associate. Planner City ofP~ncho Cucamonga ~OV "" 8 2000 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Ncgalive Declaration for Development Review 00-28 - OATX rll/IV city 0fRancho Cue~monga, San Bernsrdino County, California Dear Mr. Le Count: This letter provides our commems on the above-referenced Negative Declaration, received in our office on October 20, 2000, for 917,780 a proposed industrial warehou~e/dls~bution center totaling square fe~ on 44 acr~ of ahandoned v~eyards located on the nord~.~t and northwest comers of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. We are COncerned about the potential impacts of the proposed project to the endan§ered De[hi San~ flower-lovinl~ fly (Rhat~hiomida~. t*rminat~ abdorninalis. SF ) ~ the endan§e~ed Sa~ B~'mardJno kangaroo rat (Dit~odorny~ merriami parvus, "$BKR"), both of which are known ~o occur in close proximity to the project~ The continued development of thc Day Creek alluvial fan may also preclude efforts to mate a viable r~m~t¢ system. . We provide Comments in keeping with our a§enc¥'s mission to work '~vith others to conserve, protect, and ea~hance fish, wildlife, antt plants and their habitatz for the conlinuing benefit o£the Amca-ican people." We also administer the Endangea~d Species AM of 1973, as amended (ACt). Section 9 of*he Act prohibits the '~ake" (e.g., harm, hara~raent, pursuit, injury, kill) of federally listed wildlife. "Harm"' is further defined to include habitat modification or degradation where it kills or injures wildlife by impairing essential behavioral patterr~ including breed/ng, feeding, or sheltering. Take incidental to otherwise lawful ~ctiviti~s can be anthohzed under section 7 (F~eral consultat/ons) and section 10 (habita~ COnservation plans) of the Act. Potential impacts to biological resourc~ ~I thc project site are not adequately addressed in the Initial S~udy. The project may result in take of£¢derallyli~tcd wildlife. SBKR are known to occur in th~ vicinity of the proposed project. 'Ihough the site i~ outside tl~ Ontario Recovery Unit fur thc DSF, it i~ adjacent to mapped Dell~i soils. area~ within the past few ycar~. DSF b~ve been obaervcd within vineyard SBKR have also been lmown to utilize dls~mrb~d are~s. Protocol ~urvcys for the DSF and trapping for the SBKP, should be conducted by a permitted biologist to determine whether take authorization und~ thc Act is needed Ibr either or both of the~e federzlly listed species. RECEIVED: 11- 8- O; 5:21PM; 760 431 9624 => R CUCAMONGA COM DEr; #3 11/08/00 17:27 FAX 760 431 9624 US FISH AND WILDLIFE [~003/003~ Br~nt Le Comat 2 Approval of nearly I million square feet o£industrial warehouses on 44 acres of open space should require the preparation of an environmental impact report (ERR) under the California Environmental QuaJ. ity Act (CEQA). The loss o~44 acres ofpotentially restorable open space is a conMdex~able conltibution to the already significant curllulafive loss of habitat in the area. CEQA also requires that an EIR be prepal~d for an), proj~--t that would reduce the number o~ restrict the range of any endangered species. Thc project could reduce the numbers and restrict the range of the DSF and the SBY~R now and in the futtz3-Te. I)~ to urban, industrial, and agricultural developnacnt, these species have d~c]ined throughout southwestern San Bernardino Cotmq,. The cumulative loss of suitable habitat is already a significant impact under the California Environmental Quality Act We urge the City to addzess these inlpacts to biological resources by requiting avoidance measures or mitigation for the cumuiat~vely considerable loss o£these resources. We recommend that cmnulative impacts be addressed through thc Valley Wide Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, as outlined in the 1995 Memorandmn o£Unde~standing among us, the California Department offish and Game, and 15 loealjurisdictions, including the City. In the interim, we recommend the City require project proponents to mitigate onsite or offsite in a biologically viable manne~ to preserve or restore open, ruderal, and vacant land used by sensitive species. We recomnaeuud acquisition, at a 3:1 ratio, of mitigation land contiguous with existing habitat a_teas for DSF, SBIC. R, and other species a~ a/~propriate. Under thc Interim Project Review Guidelines in attachrnefit F o£th¢ NJOld, each local lead agency agreed to considor and determine whether the project could preclude viability of biological resources. A long term preservation planuing or impact the st~elllcnt summ.afizing these deternlJnations and the rationale be, hind them would £acilitate ot:r review. We appreciate tile opporttmRy to provide commellts on the proposed project. Since the proposed project could result' in take oftecleraliy listed species, we request that these issues be resolved prior to l."tnal project a~oproval. We ate available to work with you and the project proponent to resolve the federally listed and other sensitive species issues on the project site. If you have any questions, please COntact Doug McPherson of'this office at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, Assistant Field Supervisor 1-6-0]-NFTA-1139.1 cc: CD-FG, Chino Hills, CA (Attn: Glenn BIack/Rob~ MaloncOt Rames) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning, CA (Attn: Larry Henderson) T HE CITY OF I~A N C tlO CUCA~ONGA Staff Report DATE: November 8, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-28- GATX Ill/IV - The development of two industrial warehouse/distribution buildings (Building III - 449,370 square feet, Building IV - 468,410 square feet) totaling 917,780 square feet within the Catellus Master Plan on 44 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at the northeast and northwest comers of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related File: Pre-Application Review 00-04. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. BACKGROUND: Pre-Application Review: The project was subject to a ~e-Application Review Workshop with the Planning Commission on March 22, 2000 (minutes attached - Exhibit "N"). The Commission supported the concept and had the following comments: 1. The Commission is willing to accept truck loading on the south side of Building III given strong seasonal winds. However, screening of the loading area from Arrow Route is of utmost importance. Screen walls shall be architectural. 2. Building IV should have substantial wall articulation and variation; especially along the east elevation given it's length. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Existing Industrial Buildings (GATX I and II and Carpenter Technology); General Industrial (Subarea 8) Industrial Area Specific Plan South- Existing Industrial Buildings; Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) Industrial Area Specific Plan East - Parking Area for Quakes Stadium; General Industrial (Subarea 8) Industrial Area Specific Plan West - Existing Industrial Buildings (BHP Steel); General Industrial (Subarea 8) Industrial Area Specific Plan ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 2 C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the east and west sides of Milliken Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route. To the north lie the existing GATX distribution buildings and the Carpenter Technology building. The two proposed buildings represent build out of the southern (General Industrial) portion of the Catellus Master Plan. The sites slope from north to south at approximately 2 to 3 pement. The easterly site contains a remnant of a temporary golf driving range. Both sites have been cleared and received stockpiled dirt from adjacent construction activity. E. Parkin.q Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota.qe Ratio Required Provided Building III Warehouse 449,370 1/1000 1st 20K 132 209 1/2000 2nd 20K 1/4000 above 40K Building IV Warehouse 468,410 1/1000 1st 20K 137 295 1/2000 2nd 20K 1/4000 above 40K Note that no office area is included in the above parking calculations. The buildings are speculative in nature and it is not certain how much office area will be needed. In both cases, there is substantial excess parking, which can accommodate office area. ANALYSIS: A. Genera!: The project is within the Catellus Master Plan, which was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 1999. The buildings have the same basic architectural flair as the existing GATX I and II Buildings to the north on the east side of Milliken Avenue. A semi-circular Palm tree planting is proposed to provide an entry statement at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route to be consistent with the Catellus Master Plan. Building III will be located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue and will have the truck-loading area on the south side of the building fronting Arrow Route. Architectural screen walls, 14 feet in height, are proposed along the Arrow Route frontage to screen loading. While the ideal location for the loading from an aesthetic perspective, would be on the north side of the building, that area is subject to high seasonal winds. Building IV will be located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. Loading will be located along the west side of the building and thus screened by the building and a 14-foot high screen wall relative to Arrow Route. There is an off-site rail line along the west property line. The project has been designed so that, with minor modifications, rail PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-28 - GATX Ill/IV November 8, 2000 Page 3 service could be utilized for the building, but the developer's preferred plan does not utilize the rail line. B. Desi.qn Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on October 3, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions. Refer to the attached Design Review Committee Action Agenda (Exhibit "O") for further details. C. Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached resolution of approval D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant and Part II (the Environmental Checklist) was completed by staff. In completing the environmental checklist, staff noted potential impacts related to traffic and air quality. With the mitigation measures adopted for the Catellus Master Plan and those recommended for the subject project, any potential impacts are reduced to a level of non-significance. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 00-28 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map/Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Building III Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Building III Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Building'Ill Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan Building III Exhibit"F" - Elevations Building III Exhibit "G" - Line of Sight Analysis Building III Exhibit "H" - Site Plan Building IV Exhibit"l" - Grading Plan Building IV Exhibit"J" - Landscape Plan Building IV Exhibit "K" - Floor Plan Building IV Exhibit"L" - Elevations Building IV Exhibit "M" - Line of Sight Analysis Building IV Exhibit "N" - Pre-Application Review Minutes March 22, 2000 Exhibit "O" - Design Review Action Agenda, October 3, 2000 Exhibit"P" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions . _ '.._ " ' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ,Ic~ss TO :~ ~ .s' BUILDING AREA [~ .~ ~ B~D~OAREa ~a~.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ ~cone,~ CORPORATE PARK ,' ............... ARROW ~OOTE ........... ~ project information site plan keYn~.tes . . tabulations vicinity map / site legend .... ~ BUILDING Ill ~'"~ ..... : ......... III 1449K; Industrial Facility : .......... ' ......... Catellus Development Corporation CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN .... ~,,m- ,~,. - .................................................... hill plnckert architects, Inc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ CORPORATI: PARK ":- ") I CONCEPT GRADING PLAN GATX BUILDING 3 BUILDING ; ~ ~E~ A 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BUILOING AREA '449,370 $.F. :.: o Catellus Development Corporation FLOOR PLAN hill plnckert erchitects, Inc. , BUILDING III 449Ki Industrial Facility Catellus Oevelopment Corporation hill plnckert architects, Inc. m m ......... · '"'',"".' ..... & - li ~, ' ~" qlrI' .: , - -. :'' ';~.''' m , ' ,'.': ''i ......... ' '~'' I-'1 ~'1 . . ~" ' ~ -- " ' "~ _ ' ' ' ~ ......... ' :2:___L " ' '...- ' ' ' - ' ~ ....... " o ....... BUILDING III ~ ........ III ~449K~ Industrial Facility ('~ T E l, l~ I~ S I)z~ILol,~Exrl'o~Po~Tmo~~8~11U5 Development Corporation ELEVAnONS .......... hill pin ~t t~ Inc, ................................................................. ckert ~rc ec ,, .......... $~ $ECT~ON ~2MOON~LL Y A~RO$$ ARR@W ROIITE e EASTERN pR~RTy £~ fl 'OV~T~ 'O~'~~T · EX"AUST F,~,* III 1449Ki Industrial Facility SEE ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS STUDIES FOR (, :~ '~ ~ [, ~, ~ ~ ~,o~('~,,,~,~,,,~ C~Ilus Development Corporation SITE SECTIONS hill plnckert architects, Inc. . vicinity map project information  :'':r~ .... : ~ ~ ............... site plan keynotes ~:- ~ .... =: tabulations ~:' ?~"~ ................ '~'~ ' ' " BUILDING AREA :' ~ " ~ 468,4i0 S F. ~-: ~" ~'""'~ site legend ......... : ~'" :¢ ~ ': ~ BUILDING IV ., ~s- ..- -,~: ,.~--: :468K Industrial Facility ~:~ :', ARROW :~2ROUTE , ~'~,~*('o~,,~o~Catellus Development Corporation CONCEPTO L Sir PLAN ....................... hill plnckert architects Inc . j .: .... : .......... .- _ ................................. ? _ ....... CORPORATE J '; ' '- :-- ~ C + D CONCEPT GRADING i~ ::' ~:~ ;;;-~.~..',,i --.,.,£;~;'~J"-- ~ ~]. ~:'L~;'.~ ~.~ .~j'.~'~: ~ BUILDING , , ~ ~ · ~.' .... "~ ,.~ . A~ ' r--~-~-' ~.2_y~ ,~ ' ~ ". ~ ~- 2 3 4 ~ 6 7 ~ 9 10 11 ~2 15 13 17 18 19 20 21 2-2 23 24 a .... ; .... ~. ........ ..................................... ~468K~ F ciliiy , . , ....................................... ~'r ~ L L ~" S Industrial a ........................ C~tellus Development Corporation~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .................. ENLARGEA SOUTHEAST OFFICEr, B ~ ..... - .... ~ BUILDING IV a .................... .,, ................ velopm orporation ELEVATIONS c ....... ...... hffi pinckert architecls, Inc. BUILDING IV Industrial Facility Oeve..~ment Corporation pinckert architects, Inc. {' .~ 1' l': l, l, ii X :468Ki Industrial Facility Catellus Development Corporation SCREEN WALL & WROUGHT IRON FENCE ELEVATIONS hill pinckert architects, Inc. .o. ,,o,,E o~.,:,: ,,~o.,,..o. o. .oo. ~ BUILDING IV ,o=~~T .~o:.,,,o~. III !468KI Industrial Facility III~['IOI:U[XT{'OI~I~IR~?IO'( Catellus Development Corporation Slr~ $ECrIO~$ .... fiBI pinckerl architects, Inc. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting March 22, 2000 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:50 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: John Mannerino, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: Rich Macias STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civl Engineer;, Brent Le Count, Associate Planner NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 00-04 - GATX - Review of conceptual plans for two industrial buildings (436,971 square feet and 468,394 square feet) within the Catellus Master Plan area at the northeast and northwest comers of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route in General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the purpose of the Pre-Application Review process. Pamela Steele, Hogle~lreland, introduced the project and stated that the orientation for the GATX building at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route is being revised with loading on the south side to avoid having the dock doors exposed to high winds. She oriented the Commissioners to the graphics that had been submitted. Dennis Hill, HilI-Pinkhert Architects, reviewed the proposed design. He said the intent is to screen the loading area from Arrow Route with very high decorative tilt up concrete walls with an architectural theme to match the building. He indicated the building would also have architectural enhancements, especially that part of the building wall that would be visible above the screen walls. He stated that they intend to align the driveways with existing driveways on the south side of Arrow Route. Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, reviewed staff's concerns. He stated the Site Plan and Grading Plan are inconsistent and both have good and bad points. · The Grading Plan shows free-standing screen walls north of the ddveway entrances to the loading area. Staff is in favor of this design because it blocks views through the ddveway opening into the loading area. · The Site Plan shows new driveways on the north side of Arrow Route lining up with existing driveways on the south side, which is the most desirable driveway orientation. The primary issue, however, is to ensure that views into the loading area are sufficiently screened. The plans submitted show sight lines cut perpendicular into the site from the street frontage but the actual views of the site will be from the east and west as motorists approach the site. In these cases, the sight lines are more shallow and intrude into the loading area. Sufficiently detailed sight line analysis will be necessary. The Frito Lay project at 4th Street and Archibald Avenue demonstrates that loading areas can be screened. · GATX Building IV at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route has very long frontage on Milliken. Substantial architectural enhancement will be necessary to provide visual interest and variation. · The driveway at the southwest corner of the site will have to be relocated easterly away from the railroad track intersection at Arrow Route or changed to right-in/right-out only. · Truck circulation at the north end of the site appears ovedy circuitous and should be simplified to avoid trucks driving over planters, etc. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that locating the loading docks on the south side of the building makes sense due to the seasonal high winds. He concurred that Frito Lay serves as a good example of screening. He thought the design details regarding architectural enhancement and ensuring high enough screen walls can be resolved through the Design Review process. Commissioner Stewart indicated that she is confident that the screening method will work, thereby allowing loading to be located on the south side of the building. Commissioner Mannerino agreed that the logical location for loading would be on the south side of the building. Chairman McNiel asked for clarification of the east-west trending walls shown on the.Grading Plan but not on the Site Plan. Dennis Hill responded that the walls were originally intended to screen the loading area views through the driveway openings; however, the walls were abandoned because it was decided that they wou!d cause very difficult truck maneuvering and limit the area available for loading. Chairman McNiel stated that locating the loading docks on the south side of the building makes sense given our high winds out of the northeast. He strongly suggested that the north elevation of the building have the same level of architectural detail and enhancement as on the GATX I building at Milliken Avenue and Millennium Court. He said particular attention should be paid to sight lines into the loading area from Arrow Route to make sure screen walls are high enough. He indicated GATX Building IV at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route should have substantial articulation and variation, especially along east elevation given it's length. He stated that screen walls should have a high level of surface enhancement for both projects. Mr. Buller summarized the Commission's comments: the overall concept of having loading on the south side of the building is feasible if adequate screening can be provided, the screening solution should be effective in terms of view blockage, and architectural enhancement is necessary. PC Adjourned Minutes -2- March 22, 2000 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Brent Le Count October 3, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEVV 00-28 - GATX - The development of two industrial warehouse/distribution buildings (Building III - 449,370 square feet, Building IV - 468,410 square feet) totaling 917,780 square feet within the Catellus Master Plan on 44 acres of land in Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located at the northeast and northwest corners of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. APN: 229~011-25, 31, and 32 Desiqn Parameters: The Catellus Master Plan was approved bythe Planning Commission on April 28, 1999. The buildings have the same basic architectural flair as the existing GATX I and II buildings to the north on the east side of Milliken Avenue. The proposed buildings represent build out of the southem portion of the Catellus Master Plan from Century Way/Millennium Court south to Arrow Route. A Semi-circular palm tree planting is proposed to provide an entry statement at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route to be consistent with the Catellus Master Plan, Building III will be located at the northeast comer of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue and will have it's truck-loading area on the south side of the building fronting Arrow Route. Fourteen-foot high amhitectural screen walls are proposed along the Arrow Route frontage to screen loading. While the ideal location for the loading from an aesthetic perspective would be on the north side of the building, that area is subject to high seasonal winds. Building IV will be located on the northwest comer of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. Loading will be located along the west side of the building and thus screened by the building and a fourteen-foot high screen wall relative to Arrow Route, There is an off-site rail line along the west property line. The project has been designed so that, with minor modifications, rail service could be utilized for the building, but the developer's preferred plan does not utilize the rail line. The main truck entry points to the site are at the southwest corner of the site off Arrow Route, and off the cul-de-sac bulb for Century Court at the north end of the site, The truck movement established by the northern entry is awkward and angular and will likely lead to trucks driving over landscaped areas. There is a drive aisle proposed along the south side of the building connecting the southwest comer driveway to the parking area along the east side of the building. Ideally, the drive aisle would be eliminated and replaced with landscaping, but fire truck access is necessary along the south side of the building, Pre-Application Review: The project was subject to a Pre-Application Review Workshop with the Planning Commission on March 22, 2000 (see attached minutes), The Commission had the following comments: 1. The Commission is willing to accept truck loading on the south side of Building III given strong seasonal winds. However, screening of the loading area from Arrow Route is of utmost importance. Screen walls shall be architectural. 2. Building IV should have substantial wall articulation and variation; especially along the east elevation given it's length. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. The applicant has resolved all major issues with staff. DRC COMMENTS DR 00-28 - GATX October 3, 2000 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Building IV - Provide screen walls around two northernmost outdoor employee eating areas to shield from winds and traffic noise, and to provide a greater sense of privacy. 2. Provide 2' to 4' parapet wall returns where parapets extend above the main roofline. The intent is to avoid a "fin" like appearance for the raised parapets. The GATX I and II buildings do not have these parapet returns and the new buildings would benefit by them. This was required for the Scripto-Tokai building north of GATX I. 3. Relocate wrought iron fencing to west property line for Building IV site if Public Utilities Commission will allow this close to rail spur. Obtain written verification how close to rail spur landscaping can be planted and what kind (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All roof and ground mounted equipment shall be fully screened from surrounding preperbj and streets. All roof-mounted vents shall be "low-prefile" type. 2. Provide tables, chairs, and shade for the employee eating areas. 3. Exterior lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare on adjacent property and streets. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved subject to the above comments. Desi,qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brant Le Count The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to staff's comments and the following additional comment: 1. The Committee is in favor of removing the landscape strip along the west property line so long as the southerly 200 feet of it remains intact. · ' ~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ~o,R.~oCu~m~a~,0n~,n~o~. (Part I - Initial Study) (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the citY of the basic components of the Proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. " · ' ' .' '. :,'¥ ' '~"' i::~:.~.'-'i::'--' ~'~:~i~i-~.*~ :', .~: i.>:..:.:.: /:.,.'~:. - - . INCOMPLETE APPLICATION$ WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to peffonw work required to provide missing infonmation, Application Nu'mber for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: GATX III and Catellus IV. Name & Address of project owner(s): Catellus Develo[m~nt Corporation 3990 Westerly Place, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name & Address of developer or projecl sponsor Contact Pe~on & Address: Pamela Steele Hoc~le-Ireland, Inc. 4200 'Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone Number 909-787-9222 Name E Address of person prepadng this form (if different from above); Scott Wilkeson 4200 Latham S~-~t, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone Number 909-787-9222 "¢' INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 · /~.~ Pagel Infonmation i~dicated by astedsk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless othe~vise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrent Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which se~--ee the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Buildin~ III: Northeast corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue Building IV: Northwest corner of Arrow Route and Mi]liken Avenue 4) Assessods Parcel Numbers (a~tach additional sheet if necessary): 229-011-32~ 31 ~, 25 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. fl.): GATX III: 21.05 Acres / 917,367 square feet Cate]],~TV: 22.53 Acres / 981,267 square feet '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus ama of public streets & proposed dedications): GATX III: 21.05 Acres Catellus%/V: 22.53 Acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Gradings: Building, DeveloI~nent Review Approval and update to Cat~11,,~ Master Plan INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 9) Descdbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including infonmation on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and reads, dcainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (includin~j age and condition) and the use of the strectures. Attach photographs of significant features descdbed. In addition, site ali sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and a~cheological sun/eys, traffic studies): GATX III: The proposed site is mostly flat with berms alon~ the south and soutb~-,st corner of the property. The site drains frc~ north to south. There is sc~e c~ras:: located on the south of the property. No amlm~ls were seen on-site at time of :. evaluation. There are no existing structures on site. The only scenic aspect is that of partially blocked view (by GATX I) of the San Gabriel Mountains to the n~,,th. Catellus IV: The site exists as an abandoned grape vineyard on a relatively flat lot, sloping gradually frc~ north to south. The soil is fine and sand~. A rabbit and two sqUirrels were seen on site. Along the south property line exists a drainage swale. There is a dirt road running along the west propoert¥ line para]]el to the railroad tracks. There are no ~w!sting structures on site. The only scenlc aspect is that of the San Gabriel Mountain~ to the north. 10) Descdbe the known culturel and/or histodcal aspects of the site. Site all sources of informafion (books, published reports and oral history): No ~now~ cultural or h~stor±ca~ aspects 11) Desc#be any n~ise s~urces and their ~eve~s that n~w a~ect the site (airoreft' readway n~ise~ etc~) and h~w they wi~~ a~ect proposed uses: Normal traffic along Arrow Route and M~]]~an Avenue which are adjacent to the site and are the current noise source for the sites. 12) Descdbe the proposed pmject in detail. This should provide an adequate descdption of the site in terrns of ultimate use which will result from the prosed project. Indicate if there am pmposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: See Attached Project Description 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoffcal, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): GATX III: North of the project site is GATX II currently under construction. To the east'.2is the Quake Stadium Sports C~,~lex. To the south is the Trammel-Crow Property across Arrow Route. And to the w~st is Calm]]us ~i]~n~ IV across Milliken Avenue. Catellus IV: North of the project site is Carpenter Technology. To the east across Milliken is GATX I, II, III. South of the project across Arrow Route is the KOT Warehouse.and to the w~st ate three Industrial Warehouse B~.ildings. 14) Wi~~ the pr~p~sed pr~~e~t c~ange the pattem~ sca~e ~r character ~~ the surr~unding genera~ area ~f the pre~ect? The proposed project will not change the pattern. Scale or character of the-~ surroundin9 9eneral area. The proposed pro~ect is keepin~ with the Industrial Specific Plan and the approved Catellus Master Plan. 15) Indicate the type of sho~t.tem] and long.term noise to be generated, including soume and amount. How will these noise levels affect ad. jacent pmperties and on.site uses. What methods of sound proofing ara pmposed? An increase in noise and vibration frcm construction eqUipment may be evident in the immediate vicinity durin~ the construction phase of the project. Noise and vibration will not be evident upon cc~pletion. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: No mature or scenic trees on site. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: No bodies of water present on site. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For furlher cladflcab'on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal~day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal~day~ac). 65,370 gal/day Peak use (gaYmid/ac)., 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank X Sewer. If septic tanks are preposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sew'age system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See AttachmentA forusage estimates). Forfu~thercladfication, please contact the Cucemonga County WaterDistrict at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal~day) b. Commercial/ind. (gal~day/ac) 87¢ 1 60 gal/day RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot aize and maximum lot size: N/A INITSTD1.WPO - 4/96 - .age, Attached(indicatewhetherunitsaremntalorforsaleunits): N/A 21) Anticipated range of sale pdces and/orrents: Sale P~fce(s] Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specifynumberofbedroomsbyunittype:_N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: ~of~ bt~.ldin~s will serve as distribution warehouses. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industdal, or institutional uses by type: GAT)( III: 436,971 s~,~re feet of warehouse of that approximately 3 to 4 thousand scab,are feet of future office Catellus IV: 468,394 square feet of warehouse of that approximately 3 to 4 thousand square feet of future office ,NiTSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ' t~- .~'3 Page6 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift:. 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City; °31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of airpollution emissions. (Data should be vedfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ~missic~s associated with truck and vehicle traffic for this use. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the pmposed project? If soo please indicate their rasponse, C~CWD has reviewed the Master Plan regarding provisions of ~-~r_r aDx~ wm~r. With Lhe development of the Master Plan and first phase sew~_r and water infrastructure is being installed additionally.. The off-site Improvement ,Plan for the Master Plan eddz~ss drainage. INITSTD1 .WPD - 4196 ~ ~_~ Page7 33) ~n ~he kn~wn hi$t~ry ~f this property' ha~ there been any use~ st~rage~ ~r discharge ~f haza~d~us and/~rt~xic mateda~a? Examples of haza~lous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB'a; radioactive subatances; pesticides and herbicides; [uel$, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the mate~als and descn*be their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use. if known. No known use or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materi~ls.. 34) t4flll the proposed project involve the t emporaq, or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materfals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of afl such rnatedals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and ahipment areas, shafl be shown and labeled on the application plans. N/A I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to *the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are tme and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: '*/-,~..00 Signature: ~ Title: Principal INITSTD1.VVPD - 4/96 ' //~ ~-' Page8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 00-28 2. Related Files: Development Review 99-11 Catellus Master Plan Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park 3. Description of Project: The development of two industrial warehouse/distribution buildings (Building III - 449,370 square feet, Building IV - 468,410 square feet) totaling 917,780 square feet within the Catellus Master Plan on 44 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast and northwest corners of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. APN: 229-011-25, 31, and $2. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: GATX Corporation c/o Pamela Steele Hogle-lreland, Inc. 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 8) Industrial Area Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The area north of the site has been developed with similar buildings (GATX Buildings I and II) and an industrial building (Carpenter Technology). East of the site is the Quakes Stadium minor league baseball stadium. South of the site across Arrow Route are existing industrial buildings and new industrial buildings under construction (Trammel Crow). To the west is the BHP Steel Building. The site has been scarified and used for depositing of earth material and debris from construction of the GATX I and II buildings. The easterly site also contains a remnant of a golf driving range. The existing ground gently slopes from north to south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page ? ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (v') Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (v') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics I1(v') Water () Hazards Il('/') Air Quality ( ) Noise ('"') Cultural Resources (v') Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (v') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Brent Le Count, AICP Associate Planner October 9, 2000 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~n~,~, U.~,~ ~ 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) (./) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) (,,~) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) (,/) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (v*) established community? .Comments: a-d) The proposed project was designed to conform to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 8) and the Catellus Master Plan. No increase in building density or plan amendment is proposed. The proposed industrial buildings will house warehousing of products and will be consistent with other warehouse uses in the area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~.,,,~y u,~ ~ 2. POPULATION AND HOUS~IG. Would the proposah a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( (v~) housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed project is expected to bring new employees Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX III/IV Page 4 into the area. The City's current housing stock could adequately provide for the small housing market demand provided by this project. c) The site is currently void of any structures. No existing housing is located on-site or within the general vicinity of the site. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless ~ 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLIEvlS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) (,/) b) Seismic ground shaking? (v') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (,/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) (,/) e) Landslides or muclflows? ( ) (,/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) (v') conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) . ( ) (v') i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles northerly. These faults are capable of producing Mw 6.0 and 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to an Mw 7.5 earthquake, is 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to an Mw 8.2 earthquake, is 15 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Liquefaction could occur at the site if a strong earthquake coincided with an extended period of heavy rains raising the local water table. The site is otherwise located on stable soils. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat so landsliding or mudflows are not likely to occur. f) The site is relatively flat. Proposed grading will be necessary to create the building pad and provide the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 5 g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga-Delhi. These soils are excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. They are relatively stable but are subject to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow. The Building and Safety Division will require a soils report prior to issuance of building permits. The impact is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Uales~ ~ 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) 0 (v') ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) (v') of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ) ) (~') water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ) ) (,/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage pattern. The Catellus Master Plan included provisions for storm water diversion and collection. The existing storm drain in Milliken Avenue will be extended in conjunction with the street improvements. Connections will be required from the on- site storm drain system to the Milliken Avenue Storm drain. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX III/IV Page 6 b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless 'lllan $. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (,/') ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (v') ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) (¢') cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? . ( ) ( ) ( (,,,) Comments: a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from grading the site. Sources of emissions during this phase also include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NOx and PM10 levels may be exceeded during this phase; however with implementation of the following mitigation measures, impacts will be reduces to less-than-significant levels. 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX III/IV Page 7 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed warehousing development will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~o.~y un~ ~.~ 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (v') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) (v') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) (,,') nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, biCyCle racks)? g) Ra .or air'traffic impacts? , ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) Comments.'. a) The Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) prepared for the project master plan (DR 99-11) identified traffic impacts at six locations which will result in an unacceptable level of service unless mitigated. These six locations have been improved, such as widening of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, in conjunction with earlier GATX projects as part of the overall Catellus master plan. The project site is part of the larger Industrial Area Specific Plan area. The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 8 improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. In addition, the project is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, employee/visitor parking on-site, and large truck access. Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that project- related trips are less than significant. b-d) The project has been designed to meet the requirements for parking and emergency access. e-f) The project development will include the construction of street improvements that will permit safe movement for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. g) Located 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~r~,~y 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, .( eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( (v') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The site is an abandoned vineyard and is currently vacant with some scarification and soil dumping. No natural habitat exists on-site, and the property is not within the Ontario Recovery Unit as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat. On-site vegetation is sparse and consists of non-native species. It is unlikely that any DSFLF will move onto the site due to the lack of natural habitat. b-c) There are no trees on the site. The existing vineyard will be removed during clearing grubbing in preparation for project construction. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 9 d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) Industrial development along Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route, and Foothill Boulevard has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pote~iallyUn~ess Than SJlgr~Car~t MitigationSignificant No 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resoume Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability; however, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) (,,') ( ) ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing soumes of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') potential health hazards? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX III/IV Page 10 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless ThL~ e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a, c) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses other than prior vineyard cultivation and a golf driving range. There is no evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. b) The proposed project is part of the Catellus Master Plan for the 140-acre Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. The City's police and fire departments, responsible for responding to emergencies, have approved internal roads and points of ingress/egress to the Corporate Park. d) The site is currently vacant and was used in the past as part of a vineyard and a golf driving range. No existing health hazards have been identified. e) The proposed project will not result in increased fire hazard in an area with excessive flammable vegetation. The surrounding area is a quickly developing industrial master plan. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unl~s ~ 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-b) The proposed site will not produce any noticeable long-term noise impacts, as the site's proposed warehousing use is commensurate with other industrial uses in the area and must be operated in conformance with the performance standards established by the City for Subarea 7. The temporary increase in noise during construction, or increased roadway noise by additional vehicle trips, is not considered significant because there are no nearby sensitive receptors. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ) ( ) ( ) (,~) b) Police protection? ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Schools? ) ( ) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site will be served by a fire station located near Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, within 1 mile of the project site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. Police Protection - The proposed project will incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council. Schools - The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the' project area. Therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools. Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Therefore, the project will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent will the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~,~y u~ ~, 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following uti#'ties: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (.,~) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX III/IV Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than C) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ( ) ( ) (~') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ( ) ( ) (,/) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) Comments: a-g) The project will use existing gas, electrical, and communication systems. The current City contracted hauler will provide solid waste disposal. Currently municipal solid waste from the City is taken to San Bernardino, Riverside, or Orange County landfills for disposal, depending on the hauler. The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site. Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the project. This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~o~a~y u,~ Th~ 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,~) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") Comments: a-b) The site lies within Subarea 8 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which is intended for general industrial development of the type proposed. The site will be landscaped along the street frontages as well as throughout the site. A total of 17 percent landscape coverage of the net lot area is proposed and 30 percent of the required trees used in the parking lot are 24-inch box as required in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (11-33.6.). c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. The impact is not considered significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Iii/IV Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiaJly Unless 14.CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Disturb Paleontological resoumes? ( ) (v~) b) Disturb amhaeological resoumes? ( ) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? (v') ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) (v') which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) (,,~) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) Although no cultural resources have been observed on-site, grading of the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources. The site and adjacent and surrounding areas have been disturbed, so the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal and impacts are considered less than significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pote~aJly Unless ~ 15.RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ( ) ( ) (,~) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ( ) ( ) (~) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely, as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities, where recreational facilities are planned to support the population. b) The proposed project will not affect existing recreational opportunities, as the site is located on Arrow Route within an area designated General Industrial. Surrounding property is completely developed. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 14 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pote~ltia~ly UnleSs Than 16.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ) ) (,/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse ~mpacts to biological resources. The vegetation on-site is sparse and composed mainly of non-native species. The site does not contain appropriate habitat for any listed endangered or threatened species and is outside of the Ontario Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. b) The 44-acre site could generate significant amounts of fugitive dust during site grading. The contractor will be required to minimize dust generation through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval. Additional mitigation measures presented within the initial study will reduce impacts to less than Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-28 GATX Ill/IV Page 15 significant. Noise associated with site construction will not result in an impact, as there are no sensitive receptors within the area. c) Cumulative effects of the industrial buildings totaling 917,780 square feet may include increased traffic within the immediate vicinity. However, the impacts are not considered significant as the site plan includes set backs to mitigate potential back up into the street, and the applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees established for development within the Industrial Area Specific Plan area. Fees are used to make roadway improvements with the area to keep the cimulation system at acceptable levels of service. d) The proposed project of 44-acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is located in an industrial area along Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route within an approved master plan EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): · General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) · Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) ·Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981 ) · DR 99-11 Catellus Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration (adopted April 28, 1999) 909781G~14 HDGLE - IRELAND 4~2 P~4 OCT 18 'l~ 14:52 Jnitial, Study for DR' 00-28 GATx IIL/IV~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Page 16 APPUCANT CERTIFICA'I1ON I ce~y that ! am the applicant for ~e project described in th~$ ~nJlial Study. I acknowJedge that I I~ave read this Initial Study an~ the propose~ mJ~alion measures. Further, I have re~se~ ~ project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the propor,~ mitigation measures to aVO~d the effect~ or m/figate the effects to a pOin~ Where clearly no significen! would occur. environmental effects City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review 00-28 Public Review Period Closes: November 8, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: GATX Corporation, % Pamela Steele, Hogle-lreland, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast and northwest cornem of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue. APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Project Description: The development of two industrial warehouse/distrib~on buildings (Building III- 449,370 square feet, Building IV- 468,410 square feet) totaling 917,780 square feet within the Catellus Master Plan on 44 acres of land in the General industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that them is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The initial Study identified potentiatiy significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) Them is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. if adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents am available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. November 8, 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 00~28, THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION BUILDINGS (BUILDING III - 449,370 SQUARE FEET, BUILDING IV - 468,410 SQUARE FEET) TOTALING 917,780 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE CATELLUS MASTER PLAN ON 44 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF MILLIKEN AVENUE ANDARROW ROUTE IN THE (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-25, 31, AND 32. A. Recitals. 1. On the 22nd day of March 2000, the Planning Commission conducted a Pre-Application Review 00-04, a review of the conceptual development plans for this project. 2. On the 28th day of Apdl 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved Development Review 99-11, the Catellus Master Plan. 3. Hogle-lreland has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 00-28 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 4. On the 8th day of November 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on November 8, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properties located at the northwest and northeast comers of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route with a total street frontage of 2,360 feet on Arrow Route and 2,000 feet on Milliken Avenue and lot depth of 560 to 700 feet. The sites slope from north to south at approximately 2 to 3 percent. The easterly site contains a remnant ora temporary golf driving range. Both sites have been cleared and received stockpiled dirt from adjacent construction activity; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with the GATX I and II warehouse buildings, the property to the south consists of industrial buildings, the property to the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 2 east is developed with parking for the Quakes Stadium, and the property to the west is occupied by BHP Steel; and c. The project is part of a Master Plan for which a Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared in order to determine whether the project will cause an increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance. This will reduce traffic related impacts to a less than significant level; and d. The project will utilize a truck loading area fronting Arrow Route, which will be screened behind a 14-foot high screen wall; and e. Storm drain improvements necessary to accommodate the project are not in excess of that provided by the master plan of storm drainage; and f. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and g. The project will provide warehousing and distribution facilities of substantial size conveniently located relative to the industrial area and regional circulation routes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin,q Division 1) Provide screen walls around two northernmost outdoor employee eating areas for Building IV to shield from winds and traffic noise, and to provide a greater sense of privacy. The employee eating areas may be combined. 2) Provide 2-foot to 4-foot parapet wall returns where parapets extend above the main roofline on both buildings. The intent is to avoid a "fin" like appearance for the raised parapets. 3) Relocate wrought iron fencing to west property line for Building IV site if Public Utilities Commission will allow this close to rail spur. Obtain written verification of how close to rail spur landscaping can be planted and what kind (trees, shrubs, ground cover), prior to issuance of permits. 4) It is acceptable to remove the landscape strip along the west property line so long as the southerly 200 feet of it remains intact. 5) All equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened from view of sun'ounding properties and public rights-of-way. This includes vantage points from the north of the sites, which are of a higher elevation than the sites. All roof-mounted vents shall be "low- profile" type. 6) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for the employee eating areas. 7) Exterior lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare on adjacent property and streets. 8) Maximize height of berms along the Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route frontages to screen parking and loading areas from the street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 4 9) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as viewed from adjacent properties and streets. 10) No chain link fencing is permitted on either site. 11) Provide significant, heavily landscaped, meandering berrns within landscape setbacks along the street frontages to completely screen parking areas from view of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route. 12) Provide very dense landscaping in front of both buildings and screen walls to screen truck loading area behind. 13) Signs shall be posted on the driveways off Milliken Avenue precluding truck access. The only truck access shall be from Arrow Route or Century Way. 14) Security gates and associated fencing fronting Milliken Avenue, Century Way, and Arrow Route shall be opaque to fully screen truck loading areas from view of Milliken Avenue. The gates shall be automatically operated so that they are open a minimum amount of time. 15) Truck parking spaces shall be a minimum of 14 feet wide by 50 feet deep. 16) Provide dense tree planting along the east property line of the Building III site to augment screening of truck loading/circulation from Quakes Stadium site. 17) Relocate the pump house enclosure on the east side of Building IV to an area less visually prominent relative to Milliken Avenue. Engineedn¢l Division 1) The revised master plan included in the project submittal is not part of this approval. 2) Parcels 10 and 12 of Parcel Map 15295 shall be merged, or a lot line adjustment processed, pdor to the issuance of building permits for Building IV. 3) Process a relinquishment of vehicular access rights, dedicated on Parcel Map 15295, for the approved driveway locations on Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route. 4) Both the Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue driveways for Building IV (west side of Milliken Avenue, north side of Arrow Route) shall have minimum 150-foot dght turn lanes plus a 60-foot taper. Arrow Route drive approach shall align with an existing ddveway on the south side of the street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 5 5) Arrow Route driveways for Building III shall align with approved driveways on the south side of the street that are existing or under construction. 6) Milliken driveways shall be posted "no truck access." Post P,26 or R26(S) signs as required by the City Engineer. 7) Sidewalk shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. On Arrow Route, standard 6-foot curb-adjacent sidewalk can be used along the bus bay and/or right turn lane west of Milliken Avenue. Special pavers shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 9) Revise Drawing 1705 to add the new drive approaches, dght turn lanes, sidewalk, street trees, signage, and pdvate storm drain connections. 10) Ddve approach on Century Court shall not encroach on the recently installed curbside drain outlet for Development Review 99-60. 11) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for Q100 and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches in automobile parking areas (18 inches in truck parking areas). 12) Manholes shall be provided at each junction between public and private storm drain systems along Arrow Route, where inlets are not visible from the public street. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-28 - GATX III/IV November 8, 2000 Page 6 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cerlify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DR 00-28 - GATX Ill/IV This Mitigation Monitoring Program MMP has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enfomement of the MME. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits. I:~FINAL\CEQA'~IMP Form-rev.wpd MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DR 00-28 Applicant: Hoqle-lrland ! Scripto-Tokai Initial Study Prepared by: Brent Le Count Date: November 8, 2000 The site shall be treated with water or BO C IMPROMPTU A 3, 4 other soil stabilizing agent (approved INSPECTIONS by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMlo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route shall be swept to reduce PMlo CE C IMPROMPTU A 3,4 emissions associated with vehicle INSPECTIONS tracking of soil off-site. Grading operations shall be CE/BO C WHEN WIND suspended when wind speeds SPEEDS A 3, 4 exceed 25 mph to minimize PMlo EXCEED25 emissions from the site during such MPH episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by CF/BO C IMPROMPTU A 3, 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be INSPECTIONS applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall CP/BO B/C PLAN CHECK/ A, C 2, 3, 4 select the construction equipment IMPROMPTU used on-site based on Iow emission INSPECTIONS factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel CP/BO C IMPROMPTU A 3, 4 powered equipment where feasible. INSPECTIONS The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP/BO C PLAN CHECK C 2 plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~'~ M~ntorlngFrequencv .~ .... iM~V~i;iflcati~ ~,~:''¥' i: ~ .... ~ ~"~ ~ ' ~' ResponSible pm;SOn CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-sita Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP h\PLANNING\FINAL\CEQA'WIMCH KLST,WPD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Development Review 00-28 SUBJECT: Two new industrial buildings APPLICANT: Gatz/Hogle-lreland LOCATION: North side of Arrow Route, both sides of Milliken Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /.__/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard ___/ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _.__/ / use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __/ / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions .__/ / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Project No. DR 00-28 Completion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /.__ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~__ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, /.__ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts ._._/.~/ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _~ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances / / and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / / Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way, 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commemial and office facilities with 25 or more / / parking stalls. Designate two pement or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motomycle parking area shall be provided for commemial and office facilities with 25 or more / / parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and muitifamily /_~/ residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. sc- oo 2 Project No. DR 00-28 Compl.etion Date Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 8. Carpooi and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for /__/ commercial, off[ce, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _._/ / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects shall be specimen size trees - 24- / / inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / / tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 /_ / slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater __/ / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / / in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / / perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval / / prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of __/ / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Project No. DR 00-28 Completion Date F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /.__/__ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. G. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /.__/__ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, , FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: __/ / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and.size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /.__ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /.__/__ 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / / the City prior to permit issuance. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / / Building and Safety Division. I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DR 00-28). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National SC-l 00 Project No. DR 00-28 Completion Date Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition / / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and /___/ prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /.__/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 6. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: /.~/ a. Provide a reduced site plan (8 ~" x 11 ") which indicates the non-buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). c. Sample document is available from the Building and Safety Division. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering __ __./ use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). __/__./ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC'Table 5-A. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A __/__./ 5. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. / / 8. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. __/__./ K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City /.__/ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __/__/ perform such work. 3. ^ geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the /.~/ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / Project No. DR 00-28 Completion Date 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /.__/__ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 / / feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Arrow Route x c x ' e Century Court x x x Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item(e) right turn lane per Standard 119. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commemial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Milliken Avenue. SC-lO-O0 ~ ~.- 6 Proiect No. DR 00-28 Completion Date O, Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each pamei including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, /_____ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /. / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /~ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. ^ letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one __/ / parcel prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer / / shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be: / / 8,000 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 5, (b) (Table). -OR x A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. x For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, / / and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / / if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final /.__/__ inspection. sc., 00 7 Project No, DR 00-28 Comoletion Date 6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: /.__/ x Per Rancho Cucamonga Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of / / sprinkler system. 8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: __/ ./ x California Code Regulations Title 24. 9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: ~__ x All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. 10. A~I trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 /.__ inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. 11. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of pumhase shall be /.__ submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 12. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire / / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 13. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety /.__/ Division for the proper form letter. 14. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga /.~/ Fire Protection District as follows: x $132 for CCWD Water Plan review/underground water supply. x $677 for New Commemial and Industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 15. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC, / / UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described / / '- below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or properly. b. High piled combustible stock. /.__/ NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS Project No. DR 00-28 Comoletion Date BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with __/ / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. /_~/ T. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within /. / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. /. / 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, /_~/ or alarmed. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police /___ __ with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or 2475. V. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /.____ visibility. W. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and /.____ employees on the operation of the alarm system will redbce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / / THE CITY OF I~AN CI~ 0 CUCA~ONGA DATF~ November 8, 2000 T~. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND: The term for Commissioner Tolstoy expired in July 2000. The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the second Wednesday of the month at 6:00 p.m. preceding the regular Planning Commission meeting. CURRENT MEMBERSHIP: For your information, the current Trails Advisory Committee appointments are as follows (expired term shown in boldface): Member Term Expires Appointment Pamela Stewart July 2001 Planning Commission (1999) Peter Tolstoy July 2000 Planning Commission (1986) Patricia Carlson July 2002 Park & Recreation Commission (2000) Martin Dickey July 2001 Park & Recreation Commission (1999) Sue Rabone April 2001 Equestrian Member At Large (1997) Vacant Bicycling Member At Large RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission appoint a representative to serve until July 2002. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:DC:gs ITEM G