Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/12/13 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 13, 2000 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman McNiel Vice Chairman Macias Com. Mannerino Com. Stewart__ Com. Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 8, 2000 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER - A request to develop a 5,130 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food restaurant and a drive-thru self-serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Related file: Variance 00-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of envJronmental impacts for consideration. B. VARIANCE 00-02 - VANTIGER - A request to reduce the required parking setback from 35 feet to 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a 5,130 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food restaurant, and a self-serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 99-50. C. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 SACRED HEART CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches subject 1o a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land use designation (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for churches. Related files: Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45, and Preliminary Application Review 98-12. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USF PERMIT 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Related files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree Removal Permit 00-45. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. V. NEW BUSINESS F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40 - ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLP, - The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial building on 1.72 acres of vacant land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491-79. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-61 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to construct a 49 unit, three story, 39,533 square foot senior housing facility on 1.31 acres in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Salina Street, and MaIvern Avenue - APN 209-041-47. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-02B, I Page 2 Development District Amendment 00-03 and Development Agreement 00-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 00-30 - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION - A courtesy review of the proposed site acquisition of approximately 6 acres of land for an early education center in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 208-291-01 and 07. VII.PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS I. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 7, 2000, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. / Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission December 13, 2000 Hillside ~ Banyan 19th/210 B Foothill I ~, , D c i 4th ~ g F= .c: 'T' '- E and I are CITY-WIDE City of Rancho Cucamonga Boulevard Specific Plan Sub Area 4 //~ ~'t Cl'r~ H.~J_L Foothill CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-- MEMORANDUM DATE: 12-13-00 TO: Brent Le Count ~ ,,~ /6-¢~Lc~ FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer I/~d'h OV~ SUBJECT: CUP 99-50 /?a~.~ 57~ I'~ Delete Engineering Condition No. 9 and change No. 8 and 10 to be No. 10 and 11 respectively. Change No. 7 and add No. 8 and 9 as follows: the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Provide a double row of Crape Myrtle trees spaced 15 to 20 feet along the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue frontages per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center requirements. Replace all London Plane trees shown on plans with Crape Myrtle trees. Note that trees planted in the public right-of-way shall not exceed 24-inch box size and shall have no tree grates. 2) Replace King Palm trees with either Queen Palms or Fan Palms. The Palm tree planting should form a backdrop for the more formally spaced Crape Myrtle trees. 3) Provide substantial tree and shrub planting between the drive-thru lane and the streets to create a dense screen for the drive-thru lane. 4) Slopes shall have a softened, meandering appearance. 5) The two existing Palm trees shall be preserved on-site by incorporation into the project landscaping. 6) Trellis members shall be of substantial size to avoid a spindly appearance. 7) Provide artwork or other decorative vertical feature in the landscape area at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to draw the eye away from the drive-thru car wash opening and provide a strong comer presence to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8) All roof and ground-mounted equipment (including vacuums for car wash customers and Edison transformer box) shall be fully screened from all surrounding property and streets. 9) Planter islands shall have a minimum outside width of 6 feet. F~.ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 4 10) All walls and fences shall either be decorative masonry (both sides) or wrought iron. 11) River rock veneer shall be natural rock rather than an artificial/manufactured product. 12) The temporary ddveway at the southeast comer of the site shall be removed and replaced with appropriate landscaping and ben'ns upon development of the parcel(s) to the east to the satisfaction of the City Planner and the City Engineer. 13) The master plan submitted with the application is conceptual only and is not included in this approval. Engineerin,q Division: 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the opposite sides of the streets to the first pole off-site on the project sides of the streets. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue or Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City - - - adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. Ifthe developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 3) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 4) An in-lieu fee for 1/4 the cost of construction of special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City pdor to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 5) Sidewalks shall cross the ddve approach at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. 6) Construct parkway improvements as an "Activity Center Intersection" as outlined in the Foothill Boulevard Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code and consistent with existing improvements on the southwest comer of the intersection. Provide sidewalk easement if right-of-way  _, does not encompass entire public walkway. , Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 9 master plan and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near , Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 5 __.__.-/ be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard; therefore, the required storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a city easement on and east of the project site. Off-site easements shall be obtained pdor to the issuance of building permits. (.~,,,~ cPrO~t..pentedm on-site detention for all si~off in exceS'~of 0.49 O es. 1[ -'~ The proposed ddve approach on Foothill Boulevard will be allowed on a tempora~ basis until development of adjacent property to the east. Once alternate access becomes available, said approach shall be removed and replaced with "Activity Center" parkway improvements. Provide cash deposit for said removal/replacement. Environmental Mitigation Con~_"~w_.anda/San Sevaine Area 9 master plan and/or Io~,(~,al~storm drai~es iil--F-~thill Boulevard from t~he-exis~g termi,,,~, near - ,/ Com~. I Avenu~ to~ Avenj~e~,. P~o~d,e~h3te'~ Air Ouelity 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with construction vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may var~ depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans F~LANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 6 include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plan~' include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Biological Resources 1) The mature Palm tree shall be preserved on site as shown on the project plan. 2) The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. Hazards 1) All appropriate permits will be obtained pdor to construction and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. Aesthetics 1) The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on the existing residential property to the north using creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light downwards/away from residence. Cultural Resources 1) A histodc commemorative plaque shall be located on the site recognizing the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Histodc Point of InteresL 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman T H E C I T Y O F ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER - A request to develop a 5,130 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food restaurant, and a self-serve drive-thru car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. VARIANCE 00-02 - VANTIGER - A request to reduce the required parking setback from 35 feet to 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a 5,130 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food restaurant, and self-serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North- Existing Single-family Residence; Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. South- Vacant Land; Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center is located to the southwest within the Regional Related Commercial District of Subarea 4. East Existing abandoned Single-family Residence and vacant land; Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. West - Various existing structures and vacant land across Etiwanda Avenue; Community ' Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Community Commercial North - Community Commercial South - Community Commercial East - Community Commercial West - Community Commercial ITEMS A & B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-50, VA 00-02 o VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The 2-acre site is located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and slopes from north to south at approximately 2.5 percent. There is an existing occupied home to the north and an abandoned home on the property to the east. Both homes fall within the Community Commercial District of Subarea 4, which is the same land use district as the subject site. The site was previously occupied by the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, which existed for some time as a designated Historic Landmark. In 1998, the City Council re-designated the station as a Historic Point of Interest; thus, allowing the building to be conditionally demolished. The building was soon thereafter demolished. One of the conditions of approval placed on the re-designation was that the developer provides a historic plaque for the Pearson Station on the site concurrent with the development. The same condition will apply to the subject application. D. Parkinq Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided Service Station No bays 3 + 1/per bay 3 3 Carwash 2.5/carwash 2.5 3 Retail 2,630 1/250 11 11 Fast Food 2,500 1/75 33 42 Total 5,130 50 59 ANALYSIS: A. General: The site falls within the Subarea 4 Activity Center per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The project is designed to match the basic Activity Center frontage improvements that exist at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, in front of the Hollywood Video store. The project includes a dual drive-thru lane that will serve as the fast food restaurant (Wendy's) and the drive-thru carwash. The visual presence of the drive-thru lanes is heavily screened by landscaped berming, Iow walls, and the carwash building. The carwash building is designed with river rock veneer and basic architectural features to match the main service station building. B. Master Plan: The Site Plan shows temporar3/access from Foothill Boulevard. This driveway is located too close to the intersection to meet General Plan circulation design standards and must ultimately be removed. The project includes a master plan for development of the property to the north and east. The master plan provides for ultimate access to the site from the east, thereby permitting the driveway at the southeast corner of the site to be removed. Other than ultimate access provisions, the master plan is conceptual only and is intended to demonstrate development viability of the parcels to the north and east. No action is requested regarding the master plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-50, VA 00-02 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 3 C. Desiqn Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) on June 6, 2000, and the Committee requested that the project be revised and brought back for further review. The project was reviewed again on October 31,2000, and the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) requested a revision to the roof structure connecting the carwash and service station buildings. The project was reviewed once again on November 14, 2000, at which time the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) recommended approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. Please refer to the attached Design Review Action Agendas for further details (Exhibit "1"). D. Technical Review Committee: The G radin9 and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study was completed. In completing the Environmental Checklist, staff noted potential impacts related to Air Quality during grading and construction and during operation of the fuel station. This can be mitigated by following established construction practices outlined by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and compliance with SCAQMD rules and regulations for fuel station operations. Staff also noted potential impacts related to storm water conveyance and the developer will, therefore, be required to install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 9 Master Plan and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue, as wetl as provide for interim on-site water detention. The site contains some mature and healthy trees that may have to be removed to accommodate the project. The only tree proposed for removal is a Walnut tree along the Foothill Boulevard frontage, which is not a heritage tree; therefore, is not protected by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Should any mature heritage trees need to be removed, they shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. The proposed project includes an automotive fueling station with 14 self-service pumps. The storage and dispensing of gasoline poses potential hazards, but gasoline will be stored underground in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to construction and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The project lighting is required to be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on the existing residential property to the north by using creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light downwards/away from the residence. With mitigation, all potential impacts can be reduced to a level of less than significant. If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. VARIANCE: '[he applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the parking setback along Etiwanda Avenue. A 35-foot parking setback is required, but only 25 feet is provided. This is because the applicant is being required to install a right-turn lane for the Etiwanda Avenue driveway. This pushes the Etiwanda Avenue curb line easterly into the site, leaving insufficient room to accommodate the 35-foot parking setback. If the right-turn lane were not required, the project would meet the 35-foot parking setback. Staff is of the opinion that the right-turn lane requirement would justify a Variance request for reduction of the parking setback because without having to provide the right-turn lane, the project would be in compliance with code. Furthermore, provision of substantial landscaping will mitigate the visual impact of the parking area/cars on the Etiwanda Avenue street scene. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-50, VA 00-02 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 99-50 and Variance 00-02, through adoption 0f the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC\ma Attachments: Exhibit"A" Variance Justification Letter Exhibit"B" Site Utilization Map/Master Plan Exhibit"C" Master Plan Exhibit"D" Site Plan Exhibit"E" Grading Plan Exhibit "F" Elevations Exhibit "G"- Landscape Exhibit"H"- Details Exhibit"l" - Design Review Action Agendas dated June 6, October 31, and November 14, 2000 Exhibit "J" - Initial Study Parts I and II Resolution of Approval Approving Conditior~al Use Permit 99-50 Resolution of Approval Approving Variance 00-02 Attachment "A" VARIANCE REQUEST JUSTIFICATION Property: N/E Comer of Etiwanda and Foothill Ave. Development: Shell, Wendy's, Convenience store and Car wash. Requested Variance: Reduction of minimum parking set back along Etiwanda Ave. from 25 ft. to 15 ft. to partially offset loss of usable space on site due to property dedication for bus turn out. Back ground: The necessary property dedication in order to facilitate the widening of both Foothill and Etiwanda Ave. create a rectangular parcel of less than two acres. The additional dedication of property for a bus turn out lane further reduces the usable width of the property. The parking set back requirement along Etiwanda Avenue is 25 ft. This results in a less than desirable usable property width in the area adjacent to the bus turn out lane in the functional center of the site. In order to adhere to a high standard of design, increase the usability of the property and provide for a safer on site circulation a small amount of additional area is necessary. Request: It is requested that a variance be granted to the minimum parking setback requirement along Etiwanda Avenue. It is requested that we be allowed to use a 15-foot minimum setback for the portion of the on site parking that is impacted by the bus turnout lane. Our proposed design calls for an eight-foot landscape separation between the parking and the seven-foot sidewalk for a total setback of 15 feet from the bus turn out lane. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:20 p.m. Brent Le Count June 6, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50- VANTIGER - A request to develop a 5,000 square foot service station (Shell) with drive-thru fast food service (Wendy's) and a self serve car wash on 2.0 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 1100-161-002. Related file: Vadance 00-02. VARIANCE 00-02 - VANTIGER- A request to reduce the required parking setback from 35 feet to 15 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a service station with fast food and self serve car wash on 2.0 acres of land in the Community Commercial Distdct of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue- APN: 1100-161- 002. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 99-50. Desiqn Parameters: The 2-acre site is located at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and slopes from north to south at approximately 2.5 percent. There is an existing occupied home on the properly to the north and there is an abandoned home on the property to the east. Both homes fall within the Community Commercial Distdct of Subarea 4, same land use distdct as the subject site. The carwash is proposed to be located within the north end of the site and has been designed with wing walls at the openings to prevent excessive car wash noise from impacting the occupied residence to the north. The project includes a master plan for retail development of the properties to the north and east. The master plan provides for access to the site from the east thereby permitting the driveway at the southeast comer of the site to exist in a temporary fashion (the driveway is located too close to the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda Avenue intersection to meet General Plan circulation design standards and must ultimately be removed). The site falls within the Subarea 4 Activity Center per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This Activity Center is intended to have a less urban character than the other Subareas and thus landscape and rolling berms are recommended as opposed to hardscape materials. A fast food drive-thru is proposed fronting both Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission Drive-Thru Design Policy calls for a minimum 45-foot setback from the face of curb to the drive-thru lane. The project is proposed to have only a 20- to 35-foot setback to the drive-thru lane. The applicant is providing a sloped area with retaining wall, landscaping, and substantial' trellises to minimize the presence of the drive-thru lane. The building design has a very boxy appearance with blank stucco walls and dver rock accents. The applicant is open to design suggestions but is not willing to vary from the basic building footprint. The site is grossly over- parked with only 43 parking spaces required and 70 spaces are provided. The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to allow substantial reduction of the parking setback along Etiwanda Avenue. The applicant claims that provision of a right turn lane as required by the City squeezes out reom for the setback. Typically, a 15-foot parking setback and 25-foot building setback is required along property lines adjoining residential development. However, the home located to the east of the site has been abandoned for some time and is non-conforming relative to the Community Commercial land use designation for the property. The increased setbacks are therefor not required along the east property line. Backqrcund The site was previously occupied by the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, a Historic Landmark. In 1998, the City Council re-designated the station as a Historic Point of Interest thus allowing the building to be conditionally demolished. The building was soon thereafter demolished. One of the conditions placed on the redesignation was that the developer provide a historic plaque for the Pearson Station on the site with development. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-50 & VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER June 6,2000 Page 2 In May of 1998, the'Planning Commission conducted a Pro-Application Review workshop on developing the site with a service station. The Commission had the following pdmary concerns: 1. The drive-thru lane shall be heavily scroened with berms and landscaping. The drive-thru lane shall be so effectively scroened that it will not be visible from Foothill Boulevard or Etiwanda Avenue. 2. The site functions as a gateway to Etiwanda. Therofor, the architectural design of the building shall incorporate featuros from the Etiwanda area as opposed to Foothill Boulevard/Route 66. The building design appears boxy and needs substantial improvement. 3. Potential conflicts between diesel/large truck use and automobile use of the site should be rosolved. (The current design is gasoline/automobile use only). Staff Comments: The following comments aro intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion rogarding this project: 1. Substantially rovise the building design to provide a high quality architectural statement and better incorporate Etiwanda area architectural themes. This may include expanded use of river rock, wood siding, gabled roofs, "barn" type design featuros and massing, etc. Some examples include the Mobil station at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, and the Arco station located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard in Claromont. Also note-attached excerpts from the Wohl development plans showing croative use of river rock application, massing, and roof styles. Design of the car washbuilding, pump island canopy, and the storage building/trash enclosuro should follow suit. 2. Break up the continuous fiat parapet line with vertical change in plane and/or tile roof elements. Staff is also concerned that the overall parapet height of 15 feet may not be adequate to screen roof-mounted equipment. Restaurants typically have roof equipment that is larger and taller than normal retail buildings, thus necessitating a taller parapet. 3. Project does not comply with 45-foot setback to drive-thru lane per Planning Commission policy. The applicant claims there is insufficient room on-site to accommodate the setback; however, the site is of substantial size and is 27 parking spaces over-parked. While the site may not be large enough to fulfill all ofthe applicant's wishes (such as car wash), the site is large enough to accommodate roasonable development in conformance with the 45-foot drive-thru lane setback. The drive-thru lane is proposed to be scroened by a retaining wall/slope and landscaping. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addrossed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide substantial tree and shrub planting between the drive-thru lane and the stroets. Plants should be layered to croate a dense screen for the drive-thru lane. Sycamore trees shall be included along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Slopes in this area shall have softened, meandedng appearance. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-50 & VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER June 6, 2000 Page 3 1. Provide a heavily landscaped, sloped up area along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage to screen parking area and offset the reduced parking setback. 2. Provide substantial planting within the planter along the north properly line to provide a buffer for the existing home to the north and offset the sparse landscaping elsewhere on- site. 3. Avoid having parking spaces loaded off of the east-west drive aisle (south of the car wash) as this is shown as the ultimate main east-west drive aisle in the Master Plan. 4. Provide a sidewalk connection from Foothill Boulevard to building entrance. 5. Provide decorative driveway paving within southern driveway. While this ddveway is proposed to be temporary, the exact timing of its eventual removal is unknown because there is no pending development application to the east. It should be designed to the same quality as a permanent driveway. 6. The pedestrian/handicapped pathway along the east side of the building is only 30 feet wide between column and wall, which does not meet ADA access standards. Relocate southernmost handicap parking space as near as possible to main building entry. 7. The site contains a large oak tree and two Palm trees. These trees shall be preserved on site, either in-place or re-located. The remaining trees, namely Eucalyptus and Pepper trees may be removed. Their removal will be offset by provision of on-site landscaping. 8. Provide conceptual sign location, size, and materials. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and be brought back for further Committee review. Attachments Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brant Le Count The Committee reviewed the project did not recommend approval. The Committe; requested that it be revised in light of staffs comments and the following additional comments and brought back for further review: 1. The drive-thru aspect of the project is in conflict with the Activity Center theme for the intersection (reduced building setback, pedestrian-friendly streetscape). The Committee is not willing to accept any reduction in the 45-foot drive-thru lane setback requirement. 2. The project appears to be overbuilt, which is resulting in numerous setback encroachments. The Committee noted that there was nothing unusual about the site such as slope or topography, which would create setback problems. 3. The Committee is not willing to support any reduction in the 25-foot building setback from the car wash to the north property line and adjoining single-family home. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-50 & VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER June 6,2000 Page 4 4. The Committee indicated that the building footprint is not being questioned, but that the site planning and architectural design needs to be substantially upgraded. The Committee suggested restudying the pump island configuration, the car wash, and backup dimensions to make more efficient use of the site. The applicant showed the Committee drawings of a Mediterranean style building. The Committee indicated this design was previously rejected by the Planning Commission dudng the Pre-application Review; therefore, would not be supported by the Committee. The Committee directed the applicant to develop an architectural statement consistent with the Etiwanda area. The applicant agreed to substantially modify the building architecture provided the building footprint does not change. The Committee suggested that the applicant visit other projects and work closely with staff. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Brent Le Count October 31, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER A request to develop a 5,130 square foot service station (Shell) with drive-thru fast food service (Wendy's) and a self serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. VARIANCE 00-02 - VANTIGER - A request to reduce the required parking setback from 35 feet to 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a service station with fast food and self serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Backqround: The Design Review Committee considered the project on June 6, 2000 at which time the Committee requested that the project be redesigned and brought back for further review. The Committee had the following comments: 1. The drive-thru aspect of the project is in conflict with the Activity Center theme for the intersection (reduced building setback, pedestrian friendly streetscape). The Committee is not willing to accept any reduction in the 45-foot drive-thru lane setback policy requirement. The project has been redesigned with the drive-thru lane setback 54 feet from the face of curb on Foothill Boulevard and 35 feet from Etiwanda Avenue. The Etiwanda Avenue setback is less than the 45-foot setback because the applicant is being required to install a right-turn lane for the Etiwanda Avenue driveway. This pushes the curb line easterly into the site leaving insufficient room to accommodate the 45-foot drive thru lane setback. If the right-turn lane were not required, the project would meet the 45-foot drive-thru lane setback. Furthermore, the new design includes substantial trellis work supported by river rock covered columns along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage. There is a 23-foot deep landscaped area along this frontage, which provides sufficient room for screening the drive-thru lane with berms and landscaping. 2. The project appears to be overbuilt, which is resulting in numerous setback encroachments. The Committee noted that there was nothing unusual about the site such as slope or topography, which would create setback problems. The project Site Plan has been completely revised to eliminate setback encroachments except for the parking setback along Etiwanda Avenue. A 35-foot parking setback is required but only 25 feet is provided. This is due to the right-turn lane requirement noted under item 1 above. Staff is of the opinion that the right-turn lane requirement would justify a variance request for reduction of the parking and drive thru lane setbacks because without having to provide the right-turn lane the project would be in compliance with code and policy. 3. The Committee is not willing to support any reduction in the 25-foot building setback from the car wash to the north property line and adjoining single family home. The carwash has been relocated to the south side of the service station building and the pump is/and canopy is located 48 feet from the north property line. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-50 & VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER October 31, 2000 Page 2 4. The Committee indicated that the building footprint is not being questioned, but that the site planning and architectural design needs to be substantially upgraded. The Committee suggested restudying the pump island configuration, the car wash, and backup dimensions to make more efficient use of the site. The Committee directed the applicant to develop an architectural statement consistent with the Etiwanda area. The architectural design has been substantially revised to be anything but corporate. The building features substantial use of river rock, Spanish tile roofing, wooden (barn- like) door features, divided light windows, trellises, and traditional roof and parapet forms consistent with the Etiwanda theme. The pump island configuration is completely revised and is set at a 45-degree angle with respect to the site. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has done an exemplary job of meeting the Committees concerns and comments. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion, Major Issues: The applicant has resolved all outstanding major issues: Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide a 3-foot high decorative screen wall around the west and south sides of the drive-thru lane. 2. Provide a better connection between the car wash building and the main service station building. This could be a roof structure or a trellis feature or other design acceptable to the Committee. 3. Provide a double row of Crape Myrtle trees spaced 15 to 20 feet along the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue frontage per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center requirements. Replace all London Plane trees with Crape Myrtles. Note that trees planted in the public right-of*way shall not exceed 24-inch box size and shall have no tree grates. 4. Replace King Palm trees with either Queen Palms or Fan Palms. The Palm tree planting should form a backdrop for the more formally spaced Crape Myrtles. 5. In addition to items 1 and 2 above, provide substantial tree and shrub planting between the drive-thru lane and the streets to create a dense screen for the drive-thru lane. Slopes shall have a softened, meandering appearance. 6. Provide artwork or a gazebo or other decorative feature in the landscape area at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to draw the eye away from the drive-thru car wash opening and provide a strong corner presence consistent with the intent of the Activity Center. 7. The site contains a large Oak tree and two Palm trees. These trees shall be preserved on-site, either in-place or relocated. The remaining trees, namely Eucalyptus and Pepper trees may be removed. Their removal is offset by provision of on-site landscaping. 8. Trellis members shall be of substantial size to avoid a spindly appearance. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-50 & VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER October 31, 2000 Page 3 9. Provide conceptual sign location, size, and materials for Planning Commission review, including the subtenant (restaurant) signs. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All roof and ground-mounted equipment (including vacuums for car wash customers) shall be fully screened from all surrounding property and streets. 2. Planter islands shall have a minimum width of 6 feet. 3. All walls and fences shall either be decorative masonry (both sides) or wrought iron. 4. River rock veneer shall be natural rock rather than an artificial/manufactured product. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval subject to the above comments. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee requested that the project be revised in light of staffs comments with emphasis on providing a revised connecting feature (roof mansard) between the car wash and main service station building and provision of a vertical focal element at the southwest corner of the site. It was determined that removal of the large existing Walnut tree along the Foothill Boulevard frontage is acceptable as it conflicts with necessary improvements and is not a protected heritage tree. The Committee wishes to see the revised design as a consent calendar item. CONSENT CALENDAR 7:00 p.m. Brent Le count November 14, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER A request to develop a 5,130 square foot service station (Shell) with drive-thru fast food service (Wendy's) and a self serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Desi,qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee approved the revised design plans.  ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM c,~o,R, nchoC,c.mo~o (Part I - Initial Study) (909) 477.2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPI. I~A TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the applicalion is complete at the time of submittal: City staff will not be available to perfom3 work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: ~ Information indicated by astedsk (') is not required of non-constroction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. · 1) Providea~u~sca~e(8~1/2x11)c~py~ftheUSGSQuadrantSheet(s)whichinc~udestheproject~ite~andindicatethe site bounda~fes. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the norlh, south, east and west; views in(9 and fr~m the site from the pdmaq/ access points which sen/e the site; and representative views of significant features fr~m the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): · 7) Descdbe any proposed gene~l plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in or~er to fully implement the project: INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 Page 2 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on lopography, soft stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing slructuras on site (including age and condition) and the use of the stnuclures. Attach photographs of S~gnificant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological su~eys, traffic studies): 1 O) I~escdbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Sile all sources of information (books. published reports and oral histoq/): 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that pow affect lhe site (aircraft. roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: INITSTD1,WPD - 4~96 Page 2 12) Descnbe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will msult from the prosed project, Indicate if lhero are proposed phases fordevelopment, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: 13) Desc~be the surr~unding pmperties~ in~~uding inf~n~nati~n ~n p~ants and anima~s and any cu~tura~, hist~dca~. ~r scenic aspects~ Indicate the type of land uae (residential. commen:ial, etc.), inlensily of land uso (one-family. aparfmenl houses, shops, department stores, elc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, selback, rear yard. elc.): 14) 14411 the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the sun'ounding general area of the project? ~ 15) Indicate the type of short-ten-n and long-term noise to be generated, including sourae and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: ..... ' . 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water suppfies) into which the site drains: 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For furiher clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Disldct at 987-259 I. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commeraial/lnd. (gal/day/ac) I '~ ~ O Peak use (gal/min./ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank ~ Sewec If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discha~e to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Atfachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591, a. Residential (gal/day) b. Commercial/Ind, (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS; 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum Iai size: INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 Page 5 21) Anticipated renge of sale pdces and/or re, nts: Sale Pdce(s) $ Rent (per month) $ to 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: _X~ /~[' 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in AttachmerE B: a. Elementa~y: b.. JuniorHigh: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAI~ AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descrfbe type of use(s) and major function(s) ~ndustdal or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses. by type: INITSTD1 .~D - 4/96 Page 6 Timeo, Ma,im,m Shi,,: '~ - '5:06 P.'"I. 2g) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classi§cations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o! the rate o! hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): s ~, , T)~z~, 'IolZ-~.oO0.*~ 30) Estimation o! the number o! worker~ Io be hired thai currenlly reside in the .City: ~'~ (~) ~ ~0 '31) For commercial and industrial uses only. indicate the source, type and amounl of air pollution emissions. (Data should be vetYfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Disthct, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water~ sewer~ fire~ and ~d c~n~m~ agencies serving the pmject been c~ntacted t~ deten~ine their abi~ity t~ previde adequate sen/ice to the proposed project? If so. please indicale their response, INITSTD1.WPO - 4~96 Page 7 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use. storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above, Please list the materials and deac,dbe their use. storage, and/or discha~je on the property, as well as the dales of use. if known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use. storage or dischan3e of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above ? If yea. provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and propoaed melhod of diaposal. The location of auch usea. along with the storage and ahipment araas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented ara Irue and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that addilional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date.' ~~L~ Signature:Title: ~ INITSTD1 .VVPD - 4196 Page 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 2. Related Files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 99-50 Rancho Cucamonqa Travel Center - The proposed project is the construction of the 12,748 square foot Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center. The Travel Center will include a 4,899 square foot convenience store with a drive-thru fast food service, 6,237 square foot gas station canopy, a 945 square foot self serve car wash tunnel, a 217.5 square foot trash enclosure and a 450 square foot storage building. The site is located on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard on a 1.73-acre parcel designated Community Commercial, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Variance 00-02 - Vantiqer - A request for a reduction in the required parking setback from 35 feet to 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a service station with fast food and self serve car wash on two gross acres (1.73 net acres) of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, APN# 1100-161-002. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Barry Vantiger and William Oberhauser 129 North Euclid Avenue Ontario, CA 91762 5. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial 6. Zoning: Community Commercial (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The two-acre site is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The project site is located in the Community Commercial development area of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. There is an existing residence immediately north of the site, and another to the immediate east. Adjacent to the residence on the east is a liquor store with parking directly in front (south) of the house. Across Etiwanda Avenue to the west is a vacant lot and Etiwanda Reality. On the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue is Hollywood Video and Food-4-Less. Directly south and across Foothill Boulevard is vacant land with residences directly south approximately 750 feet from Foothill Boulevard. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Court (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Permits to construct/operate auto fueling station from South Coast Air Quality Management District. Approval of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan by City Office of Emergency Services and San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. Regional Water Quality Control Board permits for underground storage tanks. Caltrans permits to construct street improvements on Foothill Boulevard, a state highway. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities end Service Systems v') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (v') Aesthetics (v') Water (v') Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources ('/) Air Quality (,/) Noise ( ) Recreation (v') Mandatory Findings of Si~]nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier -~ EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Xoroject. ~ Signed:'~ ~~ cy F u on · ~or Planner November 15, 2000 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Impact Potentially Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~g,~,c~nt Impact Less Potentially Unless Than 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal'. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) 0 ('") b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) (,/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) (,/) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') established community? Comments: a-d) The site is currently vacant and is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue and is surrounded by existing commercial uses, to the west and southwest. There are two existing residences adjacent to the site; one along the north boundary and one along the east boundary. Property south of the site is vacant land. The proposed new Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center will be consistent with existing land uses as all surrounding property is designated Community Commercial, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. There are two house located nearby. One to the north and one to the east. Only the house on the north is occupied. The house to the east has been vacant for several years. The applicant has made provisions in landscaping and sound attenuation for the car wash to minimize impacts to the occupied residence to the north. impact Potentially Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~g.~n~ 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) population projections? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 5 I Impact Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than S~gnificant Mitigation Significant NO b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ) (v') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ) ("') housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center will be a automotive fueling station, with fast food and a self-serve car wash. The facility will require 60 full-time/part-time employees with a maximum shift of 18. The addition of these employs will not create a demand for additional housing as approximately 50 to 60 employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. c) Approximately 1.73 acres of the two-acre site are proposed for development. The 12,748 square foot establishment will be constructed in an area designated Community Commercial (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Commercial uses occur to the immediate west and southwest of the site. Property south and across Foothill Boulevard is vacant with existing residences further south. There is one existing residential structure to the north and east of the proposed project site. The residences will remain undisturbed. Therefore the proposed project will not impact the existing residences. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ("') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) (v') ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ('") f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ('"') conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significar~ Impact Incorporated impact Impact i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3.2 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 8 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to recommendations presented in the report and the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The project site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat and is located in a community commercial area adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. Therefore, the site is not susceptible to landslides or mudfiows. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project for level building pads. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading required. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga Soboba association. These soils are excessively drained, readily level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. Runoff is very slow, and hazard of erosion is slight. Included with this soil in mapping are areas of Tujunga gravely loamy sand in scattered tracts 10 to 20 acres in size. Also included are small areas of Delhi fine sand. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. issues and Supporting Information Sources: 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ('/) ( ) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) ("') hazards such as flooding? initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significanl Impact Less Potentially Unless Than SJgnificanl Mitigation Significant NO c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( (v') through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ('/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) (¢') ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? .Comments: a) Development of the project site is expected to result in decreased absorption rates, increased runoff, and drainage pattern changes. The following mitigation measure is required by the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the Travel Center. 1. The applicant shall install a master storm drain from the project site easterly to Etiwanda Creek and construct an interim basin until such time as the regional main line is constructed south of Foothill Boulevard. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure Ill-G/2 "Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed, both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit. h) The automotive fueling station will include underground gasoline storage tanks. Underground storage tanks require permits from and annual monitoring and reporting to the Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region. The RWQCB is responsible for permitting and monitoring underground storage tanks in the region and will require state-of-the-art, lined tanks with build in leak detection systems among other requirements. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 8 f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Impact Potentially Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to (¢') ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (¢') ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( (¢) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( (¢) Comments: a) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~0) will be generated. Any impact to air quality from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. b) With the exception of the single residence to the north, there are no sensitive receptors within ~,4 mile of the project site. The proposed gas station must comply with all applicable SCAQMD regulations for storage and dispensing fuels that will protect the nearby residence from pollutants associated with fuel dispensing. During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces may cause NOx and PM~0 levels to exceed daily significant thresholds. The Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 9 following mitigation measures will ensure impacts will be at less than significant levels. 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed project is to construct an automobile fueling station, and related convenience store. This will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes. Control of objectionable odors associated with fueling stations is accomplished by state of the art pumps and nozzles. The station operator will be responsible for compliance with SCAQMD rules and regulations for operation of an automotive fueling station. Adherence to SCAQMD requirements will ensure that the impact is less than significant. Significant Issues and Supporting information Sources: ~,pa~ Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No tmpact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ) ( ) ( ) ('/) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ('/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ('/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 10 Comments: a) According to a Traffic Analysis performed by O'rourke Engineering for the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center, the project will not have a significant impact on the surrounding traffic network. Additionally, the proposed site access is adequate in its interim and ultimate configuration. The site will generate 284 AM peak hour trips and 293 PM peak hour trips. These trips will not be all new trips, rather non-diverted link trips from the through lanes on Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. b-d) Access to the site is provided by one driveway on Etiwanda Avenue and one driveway on Foothill Boulevard. The driveways will allow full access without impeding the through traffic. Access for emergency vehicles are adequate with two, 40-foot driveways. The project provides the recommended 190 feet of storage for the fast food drive thru lane. The project will make its contribution to the frontage improvements and provide appropriate documentation to Caltrans relative to the driveway on Foothill Boulevard. With these improvements, the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center traffic will be adequately managed and accommodated. e/f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate visitors. No bus turnout has been provided. g) Located approximately six miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. issues and Supporting information Sources: Significant 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) () (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) (,") ( ) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) · eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) ("') City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Page 11 CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Comments: a) The site is currently vacant and is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue within Subarea 4, Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. No natural habitat exists onsite, and the property is not within the Ontario Recovery Unit as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat. Onsite vegetation consists of non-native species. It is unlikely that any DSF will move on to the site due to the lack of natural habitat. b-c) There are two, mature 24-inch trees, a pepper and a eucalyptus, and a 36-inch sycamore located along the south property line. There is also a mature palm tree on site that will be preserved in place according to the site plans. The following mitigation measure must be implemented in conjunction with construction. 9. The mature Palm Tree shall be preserved on-site as shown on the project site plan. Other mature trees proposed for removal shall be replaced with appropriate species and size as required by the City. d) There is no riparian or wet,and habitat on-site. e) The presence of bordering commercial development within the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. issues and Supporting information Sources: 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments,:. a-b) 'The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. .Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 12 issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Potentiafly Un[ess Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) (~') ( ) ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) (v') 0 health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a/C) The proposed project includes an automotive fueling station with 16 self-service pumps. The gasoline will be stored underground in accordance with local, state and federal requirements. 10. All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to construction and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. b) The proposed project includes adequate 40-foot driveways for emergency response vehicles. The site is currently vacant with non-native vegetation. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans. c) The proposed sale of gasoline at the service station will expose people to vapors containing benzene, a known carcinogen. However, due to state-of-the-art equipment currently installed in service stations, these exposures fall below significant thresholds set by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), therefore this is a less than significant impact. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils were observed onsite. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) The project is not within a fire hazard zone. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 13 Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Irnpacl Less Potentially Unless Than 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( (v') ) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ( ) ) ('/) Comments: a-b) The project would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. Noise will be consistent with existing levels, which includes traffic noise from surrounding commercial use and Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. There is one residence directly north of the project site. A Noise Assessment was prepared by EIIwyn Brickson & Associates for the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center. The report recommended the following mitigation measure related to the car wash to accommodate future residential uses adjacent to the Travel Center: 11. Construct a 10-foot high screen wall at each end of the tunnel car wash with a 6-foot high wall on the north property line and an 8-foot wall forty feet from the north wall to the east wall. implementation of these recommendations will decrease impacts from noise to less than significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Impact Less 11, PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government sen/ices in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, and is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the project site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 14 Police Protection - Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the warehouse and related office space will not change current facility operating hours and will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the project site is small, approximately two-acres. Schools - The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools. Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore, construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The project site is surrounded by vacant land, a residence to the north, and other commercial uses. The project will utilize existing facilities within the currently developed vicinity. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-g) The project will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site. Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the project. This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per approved grading and drainage plan. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO ~mpact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) c) Create light or glare? ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) Comments: a) The project site is located within the Community Commercial development area, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and is surrounded by vacant and commercial uses, with a residence directly north and east of the site. The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers Foothill Boulevard the most significant commercial corridor in the City. The street is the major east/west commercial thoroughfare and is an important part of the developing regional business area. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was developed to provide a balanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard. The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with design guidelines set forth in the Specific Plan. For example, construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center will require the continuation of the stone curbing along Etiwanda Avenue. b) The proposed project is located in an area designated Community Commercial and proposed uses will be consistent with the goals and objectives set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The proposed design and exterior elements of the Travel Center will be consistent with design standards set forth in the plan. c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. To ensure that lights will not affect nearby residents, the applicant shall implement the following measure: 12. To minimize effects of light and glare from night lighting of the site, the applicant shall install lights that are directed onto the site and shall be shielded so that light does not spill onto adjacent properties. A lighting plan shall be submitted with site plans during plan check. Issues 'and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Poten flatly Unless Than Signiflcanl Mitigation Significant NO Impact Incorp~'ated Impact Impact 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 16 J Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Incorporated Impac~ b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? (¢') ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) (,/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils. As the site is relatively small, and has been previously disturbed, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. c) The project site is located on Foothill Boulevard (old Route 66) and is the site of an historic gas station that was previously demolished. The Pearson Filling Station and Garage occupied this site for over 65 years. The City will require the following mitigation measure to commemorate the previous use. 13. Provide a commemorative plaque on-site, consistent with the standard City design. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 15. RECREATION. Would the proposah a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') Comments: a) An increase demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely as the proposed Travel Center will be constructed on a two-acre parcel and will employee 60 individuals with a maximum shift of 18 individuals. Additionally, a majority of the employees, 50 to 60, will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. b) The proposed project will not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is zoned Community Commercial and is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 17 development area. The site itself is not suitable for recreational proposes as surrounding property is zoned Community Commercial. The project is regionally small and will have no impacts to recreational facilities. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Significant Mitigation Significant NO impact tncorporated impact impact 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (¢') ( ) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ) ('/) ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ) ( ) ('/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse ~mpacts to biological resources. The vegetation onsite in composed mainly of non-native species. The site does not contain appropriate habitat for any listed endangered or threaten species as indicated in a Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Evaluation Report. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 18 b) The project does not sacrifice long term environmental goals to achieve short term environmental objectives. Short term impacts identified in the Initial Study are related to grading and construction which can be mitigated to less than significant levels. c) The project is part of the inevitable cumulative effect on the environment caused by regional growth in general, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in particular. The site has already been included in the City's General Plan as a commercial site. Therefore approval of the project does not cause a cumulative impact not already considered. d) Development of the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially significant affect to the environment. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Page 19 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (v~) City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (-/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #85020115, certified January 4, 1989) (.~) Acoustical Study of the Proposed Site for a Filling Station and Car Wash, EIIwyn Brickson & Associates March 16, 2000 (v~) Traffic Analysis for the Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center, O'Rourke Engineering February 24, 2000 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the?proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have rev?ed th.e, project plans or~proposaJ,s and/or,t~ereby agree to the proposed r~!tigation m. easure.s !o ,a, vo!a the effects .or'~nitigate_,th~ eff~ct~ to a point where clearly no significant enwronmema~ e~ems , : . /-~/~ .... - . ~ "/ Print ,am~tJe.'/~-~-~,-'',~ ~-'~/v'?TZ'~z'2 C:\WlN N~Profiles\mmunson.006\Desktop~lNSTU DY-PT2.wpd City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-50 Public Review Period Closes: December 13, 2000 Project Name: Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center Project Applicant: Barry Vanfiger and William Oberhauser Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast comer of Efiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Project Description: A request to develop a 5,130 square foot service station with convenience market, drive- thru fast food restaurant and a drive-thru self-serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Related file: Variance 00-02. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid ff~e effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. December 13, 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 5,130 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION WITH CONVENIENCE MARKET, DRIVE-THRU FAST FOOD SERVICE, AND A DRIVE-THRU SELF-SERVE CAR WASH ON 2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 1100-161-002. A. Recitals. 1. Barry Vantiger filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 99-50, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, includin~ wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 200 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 420 feet on Etiwanda, and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a single-family home; the property to the south consists of vacant land and the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the southwest; the property to the east is developed with a single-family home and vacant land; and the property to the west is vacant land; and c. The site was previously occupied by the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, a Histodc Point of Interest that has been demolished, and for which a commemorative plaque will be provided for the station by the developer; and d. The project will provide valuable services to the community and is a convenient location; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 2 e. The project fosters creative and efficient use of the land by combining fuel service, car wash service, and fast food service all on one property; and f. The project design reflects a quality architectural statement which creatively blends traditional building materials such as wood, stucco, tile roofing, arid dver rock consistent with the architectural flavor of the Etiwanda area; and g. The project includes substantially landscaped berms along the street frontages which minimize the visual presence of the drive-thru lanes as viewed from Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and h. The potential environmental impacts related to the project include biological, air quality, hazard potential, light and glare, cultural resources and storm water runoff. These impacts can be adequately mitigated to a level of less than significant through compliance with the recommended environmental mitigation measures referenced herein; and i. The ddveway at the southeast comer of the site does not meet General Plan ddveway separation requirements for intersection policies, but it is intended to be temporary and will be removed with future development of the parcels to the east. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. · That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQ. A guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Provide a double row of Crape Myrtle trees spaced 15 to 20 feet along the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue frontages per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center requirements. Replace all London Plane trees shown on plans with Crape Myrtle trees. Note that trees planted in the public right-of-way shall not exceed 24-inch box size and shall have no tree grates. 2) Replace King Palm trees with either Queen Palms or Fan Palms. The Palm tree planting should form a backdrop for the more formally spaced Crape Myrtle trees. 3) Provide substantial tree and shrub planting between the drive-thru lane and the streets to create a dense screen for the drive-thru lane. 4) Slopes shall have a softened, meandering appearance. 5) The two existing Palm trees shall be preserved on-site by incorporation into the project landscaping. 6) Trellis members shall be of substantial size to avoid a spindly appearance. 7) Provide artwork or other decorative vertical feature in the landscape area at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to draw the eye away from the drive-thru car wash opening and provide a strong corner presence to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8) All roof and ground-mounted equipment (including vacuums for car wash customers and Edison transformer box) shall be fully screened from ail surrounding property and streets. 9) Planter islands shall have a minimum outside width of 6 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 4 10) All walls and fences shall either be decorative masonry (both sides) or wrought iron. 11) River rock veneer shall be natural rock rather than an artificial/manufactured product. 12) The temporary ddveway at the southeast comer of the site shall be removed and replaced with appropriate landscaping and berms upon development of the paroel(s) to the east to the satisfaction of the City Planner and the City Engineer. 13) The master plan submitted with the application is conceptual only and is not included in this approval. Engineering Division: 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the opposite sides of the streets to the first pole off-site on the project sides of the streets. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue or Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 3) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right--of-way. 4) An in-lieu fee for 1/4 the cost of construction of special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Etiwanda Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City pdor to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 5) Sidewalks shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. 6) Construct parkway improvements as an "Activity Center Intersection" as outlined in the Foothill Boulevard Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code and consistent with existing improvements on the southwest comer of the intersection. Provide sidewalk easement if right-of-way does not encompass entire public walkway. 7) Construct EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area 9 master plan and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 5 be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 8) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard; therefore, the required storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a city easement on and east of the project site. Off-site easements shall be obtained pdor to the issuance of building permits. 9) Provide intedm on-site detention for all site runoff in excess of 0.49 cubic feet per second per acre (Q100). Pond depth in said detention areas shall not exceed 12 inches. 10) The proposed ddve approach on Foothill Boulevard will be allowed on a temporary basis until development of adjacent property to the east. Once alternate access becomes available, said approach shall be removed and replaced with "Activity Center" parkway improvements. Provide cash deposit for said removal/replacement. Environmental Mitiqation Water 1) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 9 master plan and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue, Provide intedm on-site detention for all site runoff in excess of .49 cubic feet per second per acre (Q100). Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with construction vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction, 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site dudng such episodes, 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 6 include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Biological Resources 1) The mature Palm tree shall be preserved on site as shown on the project plan. 2) The mature trees shall be replaced with apprepdate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. Hazards 1) All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to construction and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. Aesthetics 1) The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on the existing residential property to the north using creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light downwards/away from residence. Cultural Resources 1) A historic commemorative plaque shall be located on the site recognizing the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Histodc Point of Interest. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lar~ T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 7 ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-50 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program CUP 99-50 December 13, 2000 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. Ail MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Applicant: Barry Vanti.qer and William Oberhauser Initial Study Prepared by: Nancy Fer.quson Date: November 20~ 2000 Water ' Install a master storm drain from the project site easterly to CE BID Review of drainage CIA 2 Etiwanda Creek and construct an interim basin until such report and plans time as the regional mainline is constructed south of Foothill Boulevard. Air Quality ;': · The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing CP C Review of plans NC 2 agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept CP C Review of plans NC 2 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site, Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CP C Review of plans A/C 2 exceed 25 mph to minimize PMlo emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizem (approved by SCAQMD and CP C Review of plans NC 2 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 equipment used on*site based on Iow emission factom and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CP B/C Review of plans NC 2 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction- CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The mature Palm Tree shall be preserved on-site as shown CP B/C landscape plansappr°Veto C/A on the project site plan. Other mature trees proposed for address relocation, removal shall be replaced with appropdate species and size removal and as required by the City replacement. Hazards .. ' All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to construction CP B/C Review permits 2 and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. To minimize effects of light and glare from night lighting of CP/CE B Review of lighting A/C 2/3 the site, the applicant shall install lights thai are directed plan onto the site and shall be shielded so that light does not spill onto adjacent properties. A lighting plan shall he submitted with site plans during plan check. Cultural Resources ~:' ' ' ' Provide a commemorative plague on-site, consistent with CP/CE O Review of plans A/C 2/3 the standard City design. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person '" ' "' ' ""' MonltorlngFmquency ,'! .: . ' MethodofVerlflcatlon ri ' ' i Sanctions , · ; : ', :; 1 - ~ CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 - Revoke CUP FC - Fire Chief or designee COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 SUBJECT: NEW SERVICE STATION APPLICANT: BARRY VANTIGER NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND LOCATION: ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __/ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if ~/ / building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. sc-8.oo ' Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, ~ocations, and /_____ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be /_____ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner / __ including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /__ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured __/ / products. D. Shopping Centers 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) / / shall be subject to separate Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, / / free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3.Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City Planner: Proiect No. CUP 99-50. Completion Date 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. __/ __ 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and __/__ __ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." /__ 7. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an /__ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 8. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza __/ ./ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into /.__ the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main __/ / building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shalt /' contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided __ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / and exits shall be striped per City standards. sc. o.oo 3 ,rE, Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho /. /__ Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 6. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / / parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 7. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more __/ /__ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 8. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily / residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /__ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in __/ / accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within / /__ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking __/ / stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / / tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 / /__ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater /__/ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. so. o-oo 4 Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, specimen size trees, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 12. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 13.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and /.____ approval prior to issuance of building permits. I. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /__ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __/__/__ of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: ~__/__ sc.,o.oo 5 Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy consen/ation calculations, and a soils report. __/ __ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. -- / -- 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 5.Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 99-50). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and __ J prior to issuance of building permits. 4.Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering __/ __ use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code lor required occupancy separation(s). / Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class '%." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. 9. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. __ ./ 10. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. N, Grading 1. Grading of the subject proper~y shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City /.__ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pedorm such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. __ 4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _____/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 6--8 total feet on Foothill Boulevard. __/__./ 5--0 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue. /.__/__ 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. L__/__ 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the __ final map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be __ dedicated to the City. 5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 __ feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the sc- o-oo 7 Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: off-site storm drain construction. P. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements {interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __/__/ Curb & A C S de- Dr ve Street Street Comm Med an B ke -.- StreetName Gutter Pvmt [ walk I Appr. I Lights I Trees I Trail I Island I Trail ulnar Foothill Boulevard x x c x x x a b Etiwanda Avenue x x x x x x b,e,f Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Cobble stone curbs. (f) Right-turn lane. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and /_____ intemonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. sc. oo 6 Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date e. Handicapped access romps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. /___ __ 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 6.A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Foothill Boulevard. Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Existing Foothill Boulevard medians, landscaping, and irrigation. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan: Northeast corner (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center and Etiwanda Specific Plan). R. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. S. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / -/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __/ __ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: Etiwanda Avenue in favor of parcels to north and east. 2. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: Caltrans / / (Foothill Boulevard). 4. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer __/ / shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be: 2,000 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 5, (b) / / (Table). a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shalt be installed, flushed, ~/ /__ and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (Le., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / /__ if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. Project No. CUP 99-50 Completion Date 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. 6. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. 7. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 8. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga __ ___/ Fire Protection District as follows: a. $132 for CCWD Water Plan review/underground water supply. b. $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC, / / UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. V. Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. /.__ sc.4o.oo 44 Project No. CUP 99~50 Completion Date X. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors, if windows are within / / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, / /__ or alarmed. Y. Windows 1. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / ./ 2. Security glazing is recommended on store front windows to resist window smashes and impede /. /__ entry to burglars. Z. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~/ / visibility. 2. All developments shall submit a 8 Y2" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant /_ / developments to the Police Department. AA, Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / / employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / / sc.,o-oo ,2 A-- G ?1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE 00-02 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 25 FEET ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE A SERVICE STATION WITH FAST FOOD AND SELF SERVE CAR WASH ON 2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 1100-161-002. A. Recitals. 1. Barry Vantiger filed an application for the issuance of Variance 00-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vadance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng on December 13, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 200 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 420 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a single-family home; the properly io the south consists of vacant land and the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the southeast; the property to the east is developed with a single-family home and vacant land; and the property to the west is vacant and developed with vadous scattered structures; and c. The site was previously occupied by the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, Historic Point of Interest that has been demolished, and for which a commemorative plaque will be provided for by the developer; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 2 d. The application was filed in conjunction with a request for Conditional Use Permit 99-50 to develop a service station/drive-thru restaurant and car wash; and e. The reduction in the parking setback along Etiwanda Avenue is necessary to accommodate a City requirement to construct a right-turn/deceleration lane into the site. Without this requirement, the project would meet the 35-foot parking setback; and f. The reduction is the parking setback is visually mitigated though the creative use of landscaped berms, which will conceal the parking area; and g. Absolute conformance with the 35-foot setback would unduly limit land area available for developing a reasonably sized pump island, necessary parking, and landscaping; and h. Similar variances have been granted for setbacks off major streets where right- turn/deceleration lanes have been required. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. That stdct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depdve the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. d. That the granting of the Vadance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following condition: a. A combination of shrub row and berms shall be provided along Etiwanda Avenue to screen parking areas from public view. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VAR 00-02 - VANTIGER December 13, 2000 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairman A'C]'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- MEMORANDUM DATE: 12-13-00 TO: Brent Le Count FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CUP 99-56 For Engineering Conditions No. 7, 8, and 9 change their Nos. to 8, 9, and 10 respectively. Also insert the following as Condition No. 7: 7. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for over sizing of drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 4 Enqineedn,q Division 1) Provide reciprocal access easement in favor of the property to the west of the project site. a) The westedy driveway shall be as close to the west property line as possible but at least 200 feet from the curb return for the signalized freeway ramp. We do not want to give the impression cars exiting this ddveway can use the left turn pocket in the median. 2) Retain the existing 53-foot driveway width for the church entrance. 3) Development will be required to install full frontage improvements, per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, as permitted by Caltrans. We assume Caltrans will approve dimensions, which match the existing Foothill Marketplace improvements on the south side, although they may require the plans to be done in metdc. On City Drawing No. 1468, midblock lanes are 14, 12, and 20 feet wide. a) The bus bay west of the main entry shall be located as close to the signalized intersection as possible. Provide a dght rum lane and drive approach for the west driveway. b) Provide additional sidewalk easements allowing the sidewalk to meander even along the dght turn lane. Parkway shall slope 2 percent from the curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk. 4) The proposed gate on the main entrance shall be set back at least 100 feet from the Foothill Boulevard curb. Provide a copy of the recorded easement for maintenance of signal equipment. 5) The Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy requires the installation of a master plan storm drain in Foothill Boulevard between Etiwanda and East Avenues and an intedm basin for said storm drain to discharge into until such time as the Regional mainline channel is constructed south of Foothill Boulevard. However, since this development is an expansion of an existing facility and the increased flows are insignificant, this development may proceed utilizing the existing drainage facility southerly, provided permission is obtained from Foothill Marketplace. 6) Upon installation of drainage facilities to the east, this development shall be responsible to remove existing temporary facilities, which discharge southerly and connect to the new facilities to the east. The extent of this work shall be reviewed in plan check. The developer shall deposit the determined amount to cover all cost of the contemplated improvements. Modify the existing traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Marketplace entrance, as required by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 5 ~,~ Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Foothill Boulevard frontage. /~) Provide raised pavement markers or textured pavement to delineate fo lane stdping within 100 feet of intersection. Environmental M ti.qation Air Quality 1) The areas of the site where raw soil is exposed shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions, 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Biological Resources'. 1) The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. Aesthetics: 1) The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on sun'ounding property and Foothill Boulevard through the use of creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light downwards/away from residence. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-- MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1 I, 2000 TO: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner FROM: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CUP 99-56 - Sacred Heart Church In regard to the subject project which is scheduled for the December 13 Planning Commission meeting, the following Condition of Approval shall be added under Engineering Special Conditions as Number 10 to read as follows: "The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole off site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the actual cost for undergrounding from in-lieu fees already collected from development on the opposite side of the street that included the full frontage of this project. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate". c: Dan Guerra, Dan Guerra & Associates f H C I T Y 0 F 1~ '~N CII 0 Cl~ CAH ©NGA ~ ~*~' ~ Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land use designation (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for churches. Related files; Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45, and Preliminary Application Review 98-12. ~E. NT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 - SACRED HEA~ _ The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Related files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree Removal Permit 00-45. .PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq. North Vacant Land and the 1-15 Freeway; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center; Regional Related Commercial designation, Subarea 4, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan East Varios commercial buildings; Community Commercial designation, Subarea 4, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan West - Vacant Land and the 1-15 Freeway; Regional Commercial designation, Subarea 4, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan ITEMS C & D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 2 B. General Plan Desiqnafions: Project Site - Regional Commercial North Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Regional Commercial East Community Commercial West Regional Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard across from the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center. The main entrance to the site is the shared signalized entry for the shopping center (Marketplace Way). The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the site since 1958. The facilities are arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main sanctuary building, a multi-purpose building, an administration building, classrooms, playgrounds, and three residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a small teen center and garage building both of which will be demolished. While old, neither building has historic status. The existing buildings have an eclectic mix of materials including stucco, precision block, metal roofing, Mission style tile roofing, and asphalt composition shingle roofing. D. Parking. Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number of Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Seats . Ratio Required Provided Church Assembly 1500 seats 1 per 4 seats 375 380 BACKGROUND: The project was reviewed at a Planning Commission workshop on January 13, 1999 (Exhibit "L"). The Commission expressed concem regarding master planned access for the adjacent properties, provision of adequate parking facilities to meet the needs of the church after the expansion, project phasing, air quality, buffering from the 1-15 Freeway, and parking lot screening. The Commission recommended emphasis on campus style development of the site, preservation of as many heritage trees as possible, and'building materials, which are traditional. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant has done an exemplary job of satisfying the concerns of the Commission while meeting the expectations and demands of the church. The church will continue to use the signalized ddveway as their pdmary access to Foothill Boulevard. A new driveway access to Foothill Boulevard is proposed near their westerly property line, which will also provide reciprocal access to the adjoining parcel to the west. The Master Plan has a point of connection to the vacant property to the west. Properties to the east have right-in and right-out access only because of a median island. If these commercially zoned properties to the east were to access through the church property there could be vehicle and pedestrian conflicts; therefore, staff recommends against reciprocal access. Adequate on-site parking is provided. However, because of the large size of the property and existing buildings, about half of the parking spaces are located more than 300 feet away from the sanctuary building. The church proposes to have church visitors drop off family at the main entry and then park. Also, there is a pergola, covered walkway proposed to connect the northern parking area to the sanctuary building. The parking areas are scattered because they will serve the sanctuary as well as the existing school and church administration building at different times. The gate at the main entry allows for turn around movement in front of the gate. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 3 The proposed sanctuary building uses stucco and mission style roofing consistent with the other buildings on-site. The stained glass windows in the existing sanctuary will be installed in the new sanctuary. The existing sanctuary building will be stucco to match the new sanctuary. Also, a long colonnade is proposed along the north side of the church similar to that on the existing multi-purpose building and church administration building. The project will be phased with Phase I to include the main sanctuary building and Phase II to include a small addition to the sanctuary and some additional classroom space. There are two rows of trees along the west edge of the main play area to provide a buffer from the freeway. The Foothill Boulevard frontage is proposed to have densely landscaped berms (double row of trees with 15 to 20- foot spacing) with Iow masonry walls, which will effectively screen parking. B. Land Use Amendment: The site falls within the Regional Commercial designation of Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This land use designation does not allow churches as a permitted or conditionally permitted use. Therefore, this proposes an amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches within the Regional Commercial land use district. Staff is in support of the proposed land use amendment as it would allow the existing Sacred Heart Church and School to remain in it's current location. The Church will be able to efficiently and functionally develop the site to its full potential. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the Regional Commercial land use district in that churches of this size serve a regional context, serving a larger community than the immediate area and taking advantage of the location relative to Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway. C. Heiqht Amendment: The overall building height for the church is proposed to be 50 feet with a 9-foot high crucifix mounted to the roof. The current maximum height limit for towers and campaniles within Subarea 4 is 45 feet. The increased building height (5 feet higher than currently allowed) is not expected to have a negative impact on the surrounding area or the Foothill Boulevard street scene. The amendment applies only to churches in Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan that are not in close proximity to residential areas. Note that the closest residentially zoned proper'b/ is located approximately 350 feet north of the sanctuary building and will not likely be impacted by the minor increase in building height. D. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on October 17, 2000, at which time the Committee requested a restudy of the building height. The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the revised project on November 14, 2000, and recommended approval. Two alternative designs were presented which were lower, yet still did not comply with the 45-foot height limit. The Committee was actually in favor of both the 59-foot high and 50-foot high building designs but the church has decided that it favors the 50-foot high building with the 9-foot crucifix on top. E. Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. F. Tree Removal: The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus windrow along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to accommodate the proposed improvements with the exception of the majority of trees surrounding the existing sanctuary building, which will remain. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 4 G. _Environmental Assessment: The applicant has provided Part I of the Initial Study and staff has completed Part II, the Environmental Checklist. In completing the checklist, staff noted potential impacts related to air quality during construction, tree removal, and light and glare. These potential impacts can be reduced to a level of less than significant through compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct adopted construction practices, replacement of trees with new landscaping for the church, and creative placement and orientation of new lighting. If the Planning Commission concurs, than issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is in order. _CORRESPONDENCE: This tern was advertised as a public hearing in the ~ .Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and not ces were mailed to a property Owners within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Bou evard Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 99-56 and Tree Removal Permit 99-36 and forward recommendation to the City Council for approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated October 25, 1999 Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Existing Conditions Plan Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit"F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Site Sections Exhibit "H" - Building Sections Exhibit "1" - Elevations Exhibit "J" - Roof Plan Exhibit "K" - Illustratives Exhibit %" - Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated January 13, 1999 Exhibit "M" - Design Review Committee Action dated October 17, and November 14, 2000 Exhibit "N" - Initial Study Resolution Recommending Approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Amendment 99-02 Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Conditional Use Permit 99-56 eart Catholic Church 12704 FOOTHILL BLVD. . RANCHO CUCAN~ONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739-9764 PHONE (909) 899-1049 October 25, 1999 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Commission Respected Members: I realize that it has been a considerable time since we had the opportunity, in an informal way, to lay before you for your initial information our plans to redevelop the F6othill Boulevard site of Sacred Heart Church and to let you know of our decision to abandon the proposal to develop the Etiwanda Avenue site. We have been proceeding, slowly but surely, gathering the necessary reports, data and demographic surveys to present our application for a change of land use in order to construct a new church building, seating some 1200 in the first phase (and up to 1500 in a second phase), new school administration and classroom building, and a new assistant priest's residence. You are as aware as we are of the tremendous growth in our city, we are experiencing considerably overcrowding on Sundays (we already use outside seating for 200 to 300 people, with big screen TVs, on a regular basis). Our analysis of the demographic data indicates further growth in general population in the city, which will indicate a growth in Catholic population. Such a large church is necessat3r in order for us to serve the people who wish to worship God here in a comfortable and safe fashion. Concomitant with that growth is a growth in school enrollment, hence the need for more school facilities. Some of our current site is un- (or under-) used at present; we intend to develop the whole site in accordance with the city's landscaping code, to beautify and enhance the local area as one of the city gateways. We shall be demolishing two buildings currently on site: a two bedroom house on Foothill Boulevard, currently occupied by the assistant priest, and the old (and original) building of the first church, the erstwhile wine store. This second building is cm'rently unused, and is closed for any future use. Its loss will not be a problem for us. The land area will become a park area adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. The two bedroom house, on the other hand, is currently occupied by another priest and will need to be replaced by a similar dwelling, as shown on the plans. Originally we had intended to demolish the existing church, but after listening to parishioners (some of whom built it in the 50s) we have decided to keep it, and convert it to use as a social hall. It is nearly 50 years old and in good physical condition and contains many memories for many people of our parish and city. The first mayor of Rancho Cucamonga, for instance, Jim Frost, recently renewed his marriage vows of 25 years in this church. We shall, of course, comply with necessary code for change of use. I hope that you will look favorably upon our application, k is our intention 'to remain as a highly visible part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in our present, historic, location, and to be a part of the development of our city into the next millennium. If there is any way that, fully complying with all legal requirements, the process of CUP application could be expedited so that we may begin construction in the early part of the new year, I shall be very grateful Sincerely' C , ~ Ver~ Rev Steven C. Porter STL VF Pastor & Vicar forane "u~:,~ ~ -, __ -~, ...... . . SiTE PLAN ,.o.,_..,,.... , MASTER LANDSCAPING SUMMARY // ~ ~ .~ ~ V /U COURTYARD ~ C E B T K L C R ~rYPICAL SOUTH ELEVATION / FOOTHILL BLVD WALL SECTION A AA W Z E N L K B T Z TYPICAL WALL SECTION @ NORTH ENTRANCE ~NTRA~E PHOTO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting January 13, 1999 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga.Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Brant Le Count, Associate Planner; Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engineer; Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner;, Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner; Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-12 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - The proposed demolition of an existing church sanctuary and two additional buildings and the construction of a new sanctuary along with the development of a Master Plan for the 10.6 acre site located in the Regional Related Commercial Distdct (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Interstate 15 - APN: 227-211- 24 and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Brad Bullet, City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process. The project architect Ted Woods and Father Porter introduced the project and gave a bdef history on why they are choosing to stay on Foothill Boulevard and not pursue the Etiwanda site. Mr. Woods described the vadous design solutions to the church campus and architecture of the new church building. Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner, reviewed staffs comments, noting staff's support for the use remaining on site and the proposed expansion. She highlighted issues of street access and circulation, architecture, master planning for adjacent properties, and tree preservation. Chairman McNiel stated the architecture is eclectic, but that it is unique and he likes it. He expressed concerns about the sheet metal roof and indicated they should consider a different type of roof material, more resistant to wind. Commissioner Mannedno liked the idea of a campus setting for the site. He noted the side view looks different from the front view. He liked the building. He indicated he would like to see the church stay at its present location and expand. ~; ~ ~ Commissioner Stewart thought there are too many design styles happening on the main church building. She liked the Foothill Boulevard facade shown because it looks "Mission' style. She preferred more of the Mission style architecture with more compatible colors. She felt the east elevation is too high. She encouraged the church to master plan for the lot to the west. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concerns regarding having children attend school on a street as busy as Foothill Boulevard for environmental reasons, but he supported the use. He advised the applicant to work with the neighbor to come up with a good plan for the west parcel. He did not feel that a gas station would be a good use for the vacant lot west of the church site. He thought the building should have some coherence in architecture to look coordinated rather than eclectic. He liked the front of the church, but felt the east elevation has too much roof and the side elevations look industrial. He requested landscaping along Foothill Boulevard to hide cars in the parking lot with a combination of berming, Iow walls, and landscaping. He did not think the sheet metal roof lends itself to a church. He suggested they soften the industrial look on the east side. He commented that the existing church building has a nice flavor. Commissioner Macias felt the church expansion is a great thing for the community. He asked that the applicant address the traffic and circulation comments outlined by staff. He thought it is interesting architecture, but he preferred Mission architecture in the historic winery tradition. He questioned if the existing bell tower is compatible with what is being proposed. He agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy regarding enhanced landscaping and berming to hide cars parked in the parking lot. Father Porter stated the buildings along Foothill Boulevard are brick and cannot be moved. He said the renovated buildings will be stuccoed to match the sanctuary architecture with compatible colors to create a cohesive Catholic flavor and the tower will be renovated to match new building with stucco to match. Mr. Bullet summarized the meeting, noting that the following items are to be addressed when the church submits a development application: 1) Master Plan to show point of ingress and egress for properties to the east and west and allow reciprocal access. 2) Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded sanctuary. 3) Gated intersections will need to be moved. 4) Establish a campus architecture for the site. 5) Where there are heritage trees, preserve where possible. 6) Concern expressed for the standing seam metal roof proposed. Consider an alternative roof material. Provide the City with a phasing plan 81 Air Quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a buffer for children along Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway. 9) Architecture - Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on · it. 10) Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and berming. 11) Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed. PC Adjourned Minutes -2- 0...'~ D ('~2 January 13, 1999 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Brent Le Count October 17, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 -SACRED HEART CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district of Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Desi n Parameters: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard across from the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center. The main entrance to the site is the shared signalized entry for the shopping center (Marketplace Way). The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the site since 1958. The facilities are arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main sanctuary building, a multi-purpose building, an administration building, classrooms and playgrounds, and three residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a small teen center and garage building both of which will be demolished. While old, neither building has historic status. The existing buildings have an eclectic mix of materials including stucco, precision block, metal roofing, mission-style tile roofing, and asphalt composition shingle roofing. Tree Removal: The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus windrow along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to accommodate the proposed improvements with the exception of the majority of trees surrounding the existing sanctuary building, which will remain. Variance: The new sanctuary is proposed with a building height of 50 feet and a 59-foot curving parapet. The maximum building height permitted by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is 35 feet high with 45-foot high towers. The increased building and tower height will require the filing of a Variance application. The increase in height is necessary to accommodate the architectural design preferences of the church for the sanctuary building. The parapet element is 60 feet wide, which staff believes goes well beyond the Code intent to be flexible for "towers, campani es and rotundas. There is nothing unusual about the shape or size of the property and no apparent hardship to justify issuance of the Variance. The applicant will also needs a Variance to allow a 6-foot high wall with a 33-foot setback where a 45-foot building setback along Foothill Boulevard is required. This is necessary to accommodate an existing home on the site, which will be preserved. Variance application has not been submitted yet. Sound Wal!: The site is subiect to excessive noise from the 1-15 Freeway. A noise study was conducted which recommends a 240 foot long, 12-foot high sound wall along the northbound on- ramp for 1-15 Freeway. The off ramp is elevated above the site and the applicant is proposing that the sound wall be located at the top of slope along the off-ramp to maximize sound attenuation. Past experience has shown that Caltrans will not allow sound walls to be built within their right-of- way when other reasonable alternatives are available (i.e., building wall on church property line), if the wall were to be built on the church property, it would have to be as high as 38 feet to effectively attenuate noise. A 12-foot high wall along the off-ramp would obviously be aesthetically preferable to a 38-foot high wall on-site. The applicant has had preliminary meetings with Caltrans and claims that Caltrans is willing to accept the wall along the shoulder; however, two other developer requests have been denied by Caltrans in the last 12 months. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH October 17, 2000 Page 2 P anninq Commission Workshop: The project was reviewed at a Planning Commission workshop in January of 1999 (see attached minutes). The Commission had the following comments/concerns: 1. The Master Plan should show points of ingress and egress for properties to the east and west and allow reciprocal access. The Master Plan has a point of connection to the property to the west. The applicant believes that the property to the east has sufficient access from Foothill Boulevard so it is unnecessary for the church to provide access. Properties to the east have right-in and right-out access only because of median island. If these commemially zoned properties to the east were to access through the church property there could be vehicle and pedestrian conflicts; therefore, staff recommends against reciprocal access. 2. Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded sanctuary. Adequate on-site parking is provided. However, about half of the parking spaces are located more than 300 feet away from the sanctuary building. The church proposes to have church visitors drop off family at the main entry and then park. Also, there is a pergola-covered walkway proposed to connect the northern parking area to the sanctuary building. The parking areas are scattered because they will serve the sanctuary as well as the existing school and church administration at different times. 3. Gated intersections will need to be moved. The gate at the main entry allows for turn around movement in front of the gate. 4. Establish campus architecture for the site. The proposed sanctuary uses stucco and mission style roofing consistent with the other buildings on-site. Also, a long colonnade is proposed along the north side of the church similar to that on the existing multi-purpose building and church administration building. 5. Where there are heritage trees, preserve where possible. Many of the trees are proposed to be removed to accommodate the project. The trees around the north, south, and west sides of the existing sanctuary will be preserved and some of the larger trees in the southeast comer of the site are intended to be relocated on-site. Planning Commission approval of a Tree Removal Permit is necessary to remove or relocate mature trees. 6. Consider an alternative to standing seam metal roofing. The current design has concrete mission-style roof material 7. Provide the City with a Phasing Plan. Phase one will include the main sanctuary building and Phase two will include a small addition to the sanctuary and some additional classroom space. 8. Air quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a buffer for children along Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway. The playground areas have been relocated away from the l-15 Freeway frontage. There are two rows of trees along the west edge of the main play area to provide a buffer from the freeway. The overall plan includes preservation/relocation of 78 existing trees plus planting of 446 new trees. Sound attenuation wall may also assist in improving air quality. 9. Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on architecture. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH October 17, 2000 Page 3 10. Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and berming. The Foothill Boulevard frontage is proposed to have densely landscape ben'ns (double row of trees with 15 to 20-foot spacing) with Iow masonry walls. 11. Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed. The application proposes to stucco the existing sanctuary building to match the new sanctuary. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following items will be the focus of Committee discussion: 1. Although the building design is attractive, it does not meet height limitations of Code. Variances can only be granted where there is something unusual, such as topography t.hat warrants design flexibility. The Committee should discuss whether or not the excessive building height could be justified. The earlier design shown at the Commission Workshop had a lower overall height but was still in excess of code requirements. Elimination of the large parapet-like wall on the south elevation would reduce the building height by 9 feet. ~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Columns for the pergola connecting the northern parking lot to the sanctuary should match those of the sanctuary. 2. Parking lot landscape islands should have the typical oval shape rather than a sharp, crescent shape. The sharply pointed planters leave less room for plants to grow and can result in irrigation over spray onto the parking area. 3. Provide mostly Sycamore trees along the Foot'hill Boulevard frontage with some African Sumac trees mixed in consistent with Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan*** Sycamores and Afdcan Sumacs are Foothill Boulevard theme trees that Caltrans has typically not allowed within the Foothill Boulevard dght of way so they must be shifted on-site. 4. Augment the berm/Iow wall/trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with shrub planting to further screen views of the parking area. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Ali roof and ground mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened. 2. Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting. 3. Trash enclosure should feature overhead shade trellis and mil-up door. 4. Avoid having a double fence condition along the project perimeter. Church should make a good faith effort to work with adjoining property owners to remove existing chain link fence and replace with single fence. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH October 17, 2000 Page 4 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned in light of the above comments and brought back for further review. Attachment Desiqn Review Committee Action.: Members Present: Para Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee requested that the project be revised in light of staff's comments and provided the following additional direction: 1. The excessive building height is an issue. Restudy the building to lower it as much as possible while still meeting the functional necessities of the church. 2. Have the noise consultant analyze the possibility of providing noise mitigation directly along the playground edge. This could be in the form of a combined berm with sound wall on top, The east side of the berm could act as informal stadium seating for the playground. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting January 13, 199~I Chairman McNiel called the Adjoumed Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga.Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullet, City Planner;, Dan James, SeniorCivil Engineer, Brent Le Count, Associate Planner;, Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engineer;, Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner, Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner;, Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner NEW BUSINESS A. PRE.APPLICATION REVIEW 98-12 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - The proposed demolition of an existing church sanctuary and two additional buildings and the construction of a new sanctuary along with the development of a Master Plan for the 10.6 acre site located in the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Interstate 15 - APN: 227-211- 24 and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Brad Bullet, City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process. The project architect Ted Woods and Father Porter introduced the project and gave a brief history on why they are choosing to stay on Foothill Boulevard and not pursue the Etiwanda site. Mr. Woods described the various design solutions to the church campus and architecture of the new church building. Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner, reviewed staff's comments, noting staff's support for the use remaining on site and the proposed expansion. She highlighted issues of street access and circulation, architecture, master planning for adjacent properties, and tree preservation. Chairman McNiel stated the architecture is eclectic, but that it is unique and he likes it. He expressed concerns about the sheet metal roof and indicated they should consider a different type of roof material, more resistant to wind. Commissioner Mannedno liked the idea of a campus setting for the site. He noted the side view _ looks different from the front view. He liked the building. He indicated he would like to see the church stay at its present location and expand. Commissioner Stewart thought there are too many design styles happening on the main church building. She liked the Foothill Boulevard facade shown because it looks 'Mission' style. She preferred more of the Mission style architecture with more compatible colors. She felt the east elevation is too high. She encouraged the church to master plan for the lot to the west. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concoms regarding having children attend school on a sfl'eet as busy as Foothill Boulevard for environmental reasons, but he supported the use. He advised the applicant to work with the neighbor to come up with a good plan for the west parcel. He did not feel that a gas station would be a good use for the vacant lot west of the church site. He thought the building should have some coherence in architecture to look coordinated rather than eclectic. He liked the front of the church, but felt the east elevation has too much roof and the side elevations look industrial. He requested landscaping along Foothill Boulevard to hide cars in the parking lot with a combination of berming, Iow walls, and landscaping. He did not think the sheet metal roof lends itself to a church. He suggested they soften the industrial look on the east side. He commented that the existing church building has a nice flavor. Commissioner Macias felt the church expansion is a great thing for the community. He asked that the applicant address the traffic and circulation comments outlined by staff. He thought it is interesting architecture, but he preferred Mission architecture in the historic winery tradition. He questioned if the existing bell tower is compatible with what is being proposed. He agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy regarding enhanced landscaping and berming to hide cars parked in the parki .rig lot. Father Porter stated the buildings along Foothill Boulevard are brick and cannot be moved. He said the renovated buildings will be stuccoed to match the sanctuary architecture with compatible colors to create a cohesive Catholic flavor and the tower will be renovated to match new building with stuCcO to match. Mr. Buller summarized the meeting, noting that the following items are to be addressed when the church submits a development application: 1) Master Plan to show point of ingress and egress for properties to the east and west and allow reciprocal access. 2) Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded sanctuary. 3) Gated intersections will need to be moved. 4) Establish a campus architecture for the site. 5) Where there are heritage trees, preserve where possible. 6) Concern expressed for the standing seam metal roof proposed. Consider an alternative roof material. Provide the City with a phasing plan Air Quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a buffer for children along Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway. 9) Architecture - Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on 10) Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and berrning. 1 1) Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed. -2' 0,.~ ~ January 13, 1999 PC Adjourned Minutes I EAST ELEVATION ,] ~ ~ · F6OTHILL EOULEVARD FACADE . WlHD lCRIIN ~5~L~ ~T~b~ ""~"'~ NORTH ELEVATION DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:20 p.m. Brent Le Count November 14, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH. - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district of Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Back.qround: The project was reviewed by the Committee on October 17, 2000. The Committee (Stewart and Coleman) had the following comments: 1. The excessive 59-foot building height is an issue. Restudy the building to lower it as much as possible while still meeting the functional necessities of the church. The applicant has provided two alternative designs for the Committee to review. Both show an overall building height of 51 feet (6 feet above the maximum height allowed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) and both have an 8-foot high cross on top. Both alternatives are 8 feet lower than the original proposal. The alternative designs differ slightly in terms of use of materials, subtle massing differences, and cross details. Staff is of the opinion that both alternatives represent a reasonable compromise for building height and achieve a high quality of architectural design. The Committee has the opportunity to pick their preferred alternative. Staff believes that the increase in building height is reasonable given that the church requires certain technical and aesthetic considerations that dictate the building height that are different from the commercial uses now permitted in the area. The applicant is concurrently processing a Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan amendment to allow churches in the Regional Commercial land use designation of Subarea 4. The Specific Plan can also be amended to allow churches to be up to 60 feet high when not located within 300 feet of a residential area (the Sacred Heart Church sanctuary building is approximately 350 feet away from the nearest residential property) subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Have the noise consultant analyze the possibility of providing noise mitigation directly along the playground edge. This could be in the form of a combined berm with sound wall on top. The east side of the berm could act as informal stadium seating for the playground. After further research, Staff has determined that the noise barrier is only necessary to mitigate freeway noise for the playground area, not for the sanctuary building. The playground area is an existing part of the church campus and the future classrooms planned with this application will not increase the number of students at the facility. Normal construction should provide adequate sound attenuation, to comply with city standards for interior noise levels, for the sanctuary and other new buildings. Therefore, it has been determined that sound attenuation is not required for the project in order to address compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the General Plan. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH November 14, 2000 Page 2 Outstandinq Issues: The following issues were identified in the previous comments to the Committee dated October 17, 2000, but remain unresolved. The applicant agreed to the comments. They should be included as conditions of approval for the project. 1. Columns for the pergola connecting the northern parking lot to the sanctuary should match those of the sanctuary. 2. Parking lot landscape islands should have the typical oval shape rather than a sharp, crescent shape. The sharply pointed planters leave tess room for plants to grow and can result in irrigation over spray onto the parking area. 3. Provide mostly Sycamore trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage consistent with Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Sycamores are Foothill Boulevard theme trees that Caltrans has typically not allowed within the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way so they must be shifted on-site. 4. Augment the berm/Iow wall/trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with shrub p~anting to further screen views of the parking area. 5. All roof- and ground-mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened. 6, Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting. 7. Trash enclosure should feature overhead shade trellis and roll-up door, 8. Avoid having a double fence condition along the project perimeter. Church should make a good faith effort to work with adjoining property owners to remove existing chain link fence and replace with single fence. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval subject to the above comments. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee reviewed the revised plans and chose Alternative B. However, the Committee is comfor{able with both the original design and Alternative B and if the applicant so chooses, Both alternatives can proceed to the Planning Commission for review. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. IN~QMPLETE APPLICATIONS Vv;{.L NOT ~E PROCESSED. Pteaae note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the lime of submittal; Ci~ staff will not be available to pedorm work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form-pertain$~ ' : ~,/~:)(~--~--~" ...... .... Project TTlie: Sacred Heart Church & School - Etiwanda ~ Name&Add~ssofpmjectowner(s); The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino 1201 E. Hiqhland Ave. San Sern~Y~--- CA 24 Name & Add~s~ ofdeveloperorp~ject spon~Oc Very Rev. Steven C. Porter Sacred Heart Catholic Church Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 ContactPe~on & Address; Architect, C. Ted Woods Very Rev. Steven C. Porter ~9300 Quercus Lane & Pat Hanse~/Bldg ~o~ittee C Fores~ Falls CA 92339 ~2~ ~o~hill Blv~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Telephone Num~ec /FAX (909) 794-6161 909 899-104 - -- FAX (909) ~99-3229 Name ~ Add~ o[ pe~on p~pa~ng thi~ foe'(if di~e~nt lmm aDo~e): C. Ted Woods Telephone Number:. Information indicated by asterisk [') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otheP, vise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) w~hich includes the project site. and indicate the site bounda~fes. 2] Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views in~ the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and fr~m. the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features frem the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. · . . ' ' site inside Feasibility Study, March 19987 . NOTE: See pho.~o.s_0f exlst~ngc=~ ~.rnard' . Sacred Heart C~urcn, 3) Project Location (descn'~e): ~locese oL ............ ~no. · : D area ~ - ~:t~wanaa/~one ~u, of Rancho Cucamonga, 9/~?9,_su_ ~-~ -~' ~t~on 5.T.1S, R.6.W$'.~$.B. as shown vd. That ortion of tne ~as~ l/~ u~..~--~-~ ~e~ o~ t{ancno ~ucamonga Bi P book 3b a e ~o .~ ~ on the re~co_rd ~of___s~ur_~v?~y~ ~ecor~sPo~ sai~ count~. County or ban o~u~, 4) Assessor's Parcel Numt3ere (attach additional sheet if necessary): see attached site map'with'~list of existing parcel numt~rs. ~ · 5; Gross Site Ama (ac/sq. ft.): Gross = 465,928 sq ft 10.69 acres NetSiteAraa(totalsites~em~usaraaofpub~streets&preposedde~cat~ns): Net = 465,928 sq ft - 17,670 sq ft (area of RDW) = 448,258 sq ft or 10.~8 acres 7) Desctfbe any prcposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if neces,',ary: The City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ · - E i ~ ~ @ Etiwanda Gateway ~ity Entrance Sign 8) Include a desc~fption of all permits which will be necessary from the CiD/of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemrnental agencies in order to fully implement 'the prc]ect: ' · 1. Conditional Use Permit: for continuing, improving and expanding exist Catholic Church and K-8 school. ~ ~ 2. Land use change for existing non-conforming use. ~ 3. Tree rem~val (damaged as per arboristT~s rep°rt attached.) ' t 5.) Building construction permit. 6.) State of california Dept of Transportation. Descrfbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Desc~be any existing structures on site (including age and condition] and the use of'the str~ctures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition. · . · ical and/or h drologic studies, biotic, and aroheological surveys, traftT, c studies): site all sources of ~nfor~nat. ion (~;e., geolog__~ ;~+~n are two spiral bound reports. 1.) Attached with Feasibility Report, March 1998, and an informa_t~.on Re__s.o_~u.r.c~e~ Base· ' --~--~ e of the existing site~ by · lus research at~act~ed, P bul ldln s ana 3.) At the ~uc-~-°-n~g~c~a'~r~ K-8 sc lng of the site is as a parklike campus setting __ ~,,rr~n V Wl llstorlc inks to the Ellenas 4.) The church and school have chosen to stay at their existing site with '' ~tlons o constructing ~ new 's~-~~ school. ~~ ¼,,~ dln~S, drlveway.s~ .si~ 5~£ De im roved across the whole site. The now,prominent existing church and . - named ~re~=d H~earteW~Yc~)lairs 6. ) New main private entrance driveway (to De . . ertv has been taken int_O_C_o_ns~i~d=~e~ra~tion access to the ad acent west ro ---------- eratlon _ turn lane· 7.') The overall plan is to remain, improve, beautify, and expana this '' ~--ac~ lty to accrue -~ r~le use. O] Oe$cdbe ~he known cultural and/or histodcal aspects of the site. Site all sources of infon'nation (books. published ~porfs and oral histoO'): See histor of the site written in bound re crt: information Base Resource Base.) 11] Oescdbe any~ise ~urces and th;ir ~eve~s that n~w ~ffect the site (aircra~% ~adw~y noise~ etc.] and h~w they w~ affect ~P~f°~s"is bounded along the northwest s~d_e_ by freeway 1-15. At peak · -The actual noise level~ h~ _ --- . ~ ~eewav ~enerates nol~ are commuting times, u~ ~ z = nc ed b ~°-r' ~- -i a~l~e~ =f[~- -- tructed. ol If sound levels are too high, a wall may need to be constructed. 12) Describe the p~posed project ~ ~ta#. ~ should provue an adequate desc~n of ~e site ~ te~s of ultimate use which will rosult £~m the prosed pmject. ~d~ate ~ thero am pmposed phases ~r developmen~ the extent of development lo occur with each phase, and the anfic~ated completion of each ~cmment. Attach ad~l~nal sheet(~ ~necessa~: (See attached Feasibility Report.) Also, the overall project renovation and newly constructed buildings will be phased with demolition and construction of new parking lots and site utility improvements first. Next, the school playfield and new classroom building and a new priest's residence will be constructed to be completed in advance of the final phase of constructing the new church. Also the offsite construction or dedicated street widening will be sequenced durin~ the abovle steps as per CalTrans Anticipated completion is by December 25, 2000, pending required city approval process time. 13) Descdbe the surrounding properties, including infon~ation on plants and animals and any cultuml, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential. commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartmen't houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height. frontage, setback, rear ya~, etc.): (See attached Feasibility Report which describes these aspects.) 14) ~# the proposed p~ect change ~e pa~em, scale or character of the sun'ounding gene~l ama of the p~ject? NO. The pattern nf '~e~'i~nal ~°mm~r~i=l ~n~ c~m~uni~y ~°~mer~ial use. already exists and without use compatibility issues arising from the existing Catholic Church. This parklike setting will actually be a welcome relief to the result of too many or too much commercial deve~o in one zone or neighborhood. Page 4 15) Indicate the type of short-len'n and long-term noise to be genecated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. t,%,'hat methods of sound proofing am. proposed? Continuing church and school use not a factor. attached arborist's r.eport Indicale proposed removals and/or replacements o[ mature or scenic trees: (_ See '15)and site tree map.) Basically the design of the site plan follows the ~ 90% of the existing onsite mature trees will remain, other specialty trees such as mature Date Fan Palms and Myrtles · Some American 'Elms and Mulberry trees will be replanted. w~ ocate~ ~ 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: - The site resentl drai ' · 8) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimatesJ. For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County t~ater Disttfct at g87o2591. a. Residential (gal/day) N/A - Peak use (gab'Day) N/A - · h Peak use (gal/miru'acJ 1 5 0 0 - chur /ac b. -~'~m~(gayday k x Sewec If septic tanks are prOposed, attach ..... , ~wa,~e disposal. .. Septic Tan ~ ........ '-~ted daily sewage generation: (See 19) Indicate proposea mernou percolalion tests. If discharge to a sam[aO' Attachment A for usage estfmale$). For further ctadfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. Churc 'h~~ ~udes underground l;. ~J~m~e~*cz~nc~ga~/day/ac) ~0~ includes un~e[9~u~ aban~onea · connection to existing Foothill Blvd. sewer system. 20) Number of residential ~nit$: · , ~.tached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: - (N/A) is church use .41tached (indicate whether units are r~ntal or for sale units): N / A 21) Anticipated ~nge of sale pdces and/or rent$: Sale Pdce(s) $ to $ N / A ,_ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N lA 23) indicateanticipatedhouseholdsizebyunittype: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the pn~ject: Contact the appropriate School Distt~cts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: N / A b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAl. AND INSTIT~,ITTON,4I. PROJECTS 25) Desc~fbe type ~f use(s~ ~nd maj~r functi~n(s) ~f c~mmercia~ industda~ ~r instituti~na~ use$: 1200 - 1500 seat Catholic Church ~ K-8 Catholic church school ~ 26) ~tal~oramaofcomme~al'~dustdal'°r~stitu#°nalusesbyt~e: - ft 8. existing quarters 1,400 1. existing ~~+~ ~ ....... .~ ,'000 10. existing comm center 10,725~ 3. rec~orv 2,575 sq ft . , ~ 50 sq 5. new rectory 2,500 sq ft 12. new school bldg. 7,500 sq 6. existing quarters 1,050 s~~ 7 existing garage* 440 sq ft * to be demolished ~ 27) Indicate hou~ of ope~tion: Church use: Saturday 4 pm - 8 pm School use: Mon-Fri 7 am - 6 pm Sun ay 7 am - 8 pm ----------~ mos per year 28) Number of employees: Total: N/A Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakd~wn ~f anticipa~ed j~b c~assi~cati~ns~ inc~uding wage and sa~a~~ ranges~ as we~~ as an indicati~n ~f the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '3 I) For commercial and industdal uses only, indicate the sou[ce, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distttct, at (818) 572-6283): 32) Have thewater~ sewer~ fire~ and ~d c~ntro~ agencies serving the pmject been c~nta~ed t~ detennine their abi~ity t~ provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Yes, __ The response resulting from the preliminary review by planning commission nd sm sequen zee lngs wi_. cl.y agencles anu epar me.n s ~n__l_c~a~..e;~a p~o=s~t~ respo dedicating and widening Foothill Blvd, along the property frontage, Page 7 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use. storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. A/so note underground storage of any of the above. P/ease list the materials and describe their use. storage, and/or discharge on the proper~y, as well as the dates of use, if known. NO 34) Vi411 the proposed project involve the temporary or long-teen use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes. provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposaL The location of such uses. along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. NO I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and con'ect tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further unde~tand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho C~ucamonga, Date: I ~0 --17 .~ / ~ 7 7 Signature: ~ F '"~~'''~'~. Title: Very Rev. Steven C. Porter INITSTD1 .WPD - 4~96 Pa~e8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 99-56 2. Related Files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree Removal Permit 00-45. 3. Description of Project: The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Sacred Heart Church and School 12704 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Regional Related Commercial 6. Zoning: Regional Related Commemial (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 11-acre site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The project site is located in the Regional Related Commemial area of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Across Foothill Boulevard to the south is the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center with which the Church shares it's main signalized entry (Marketplace Drive). To the west and north lie vacant land and to the east there are several scattered structures used for office and related uses. There is also a makeshift junkyard to the east. The 1-15 Freeway and northbound on-ramp runs along the northwest boundary of the site. The property to the northeast is zoned for residential development. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho. Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Count (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Permits to construct street improvements and storm drain improvements on Foothill Boulevard from Caltrans. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is Potent'ally Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services Ii( ) Population and Housing (x) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems il(./) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources Il(v') Water ( ) Hazards (v') Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources Il(v') Air Quality (v') Noise ( ) Recreation (v') Mandatory Findin~Ts of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (,") I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Brent Le Count, AICP Associate Planner November 15, 2000 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and. Supporting Information Sources: Significant 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) '0 ('/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 3 c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ( ) ( ) (v') vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ( ) ( ) (v') established community? Comments: a-d) The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the site since 1958. The facilities are arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main sanctuary building, a multi- purpose building, an administration building, classrooms and playgrounds, and three residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a small teen center and garage building, both of which will be demolished. While old, neither building has historic status. The new sanctuary will be built to the west of the existing sanctuary, which will be converted to other church uses. The expansion is not expected to conflict with existing or planned uses in the vicinity. The sanctuary building will be located approximately 350 feet from the nearest residentially zoned property. The building height is proposed to exceed code specified limits but this is not expected to have a negative impact on the vicinity due to the commercial nature of the area and the high quality architectural design of the sanctuary. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposak a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The new sanctuary is not expected to attract a substantial number of new residents to the area, The expansion is intended to serve the needs of the existing community. c) The site is already developed with church and school facilities. The new sanctuary will be constructed in an area designated Regional ReJated Commercial (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Commercial uses occur in the immediate vicinity. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~g.~f,:.n, 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fautt rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (¢) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (¢') ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the sit. It is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3.2 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is 8 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to recommendations presented in the report and the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The project site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat and is located in a commercial area adjacent to Foothill Boulevard; therefore, the site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows. f) The topography will be minimally altered to accommodate the project for level foundation but the area where the sanctuary is proposed is already graded and paved for parking. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading required. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga Delhi association. This soil type is indicated to have potential limited bearing capacities. It is standard practice to require a soils analysis prior to issuance of building permits. There is no evidence of soil related structural problems inherent in the on-site buildings. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 5 i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting information Sources: 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ( ) ( ) (¢') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ( ) ('") ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ( ) ( ) ('") groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The site is already developed with church facilities, school facilities, and a parking area. The new sanctuary is proposed in an area now occupied by parking so the increase in hard surface and runoff is therefore negligible. The increased flows can be accommodated utilizing the existing drainage facilities in the area so long as permission can be obtained from the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the south. Proper grading and drainage control per the above mitigation will ensure this potential impact is less than significant. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure Ill-G/2 "Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 6 c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied. h) The project does not entail use of hazardous substances. The only possible impact to ground water would be from irrigation of landscaped areas and runoff from parking areas but this is nominal and not out of the ordinary. There is no anticipated impact. f, g, ~ The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to (x) ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ('/) ( ) ¢) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ('") cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ('/) Comments: a) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During grading, fugitive dust (PMm) will be generated. Any impact to air quality from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 1) The areas of the site where raw soil is exposed shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403, 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 7 b) There are no sensitive receptors within ~,~ mile of the project site other than planned residential land to the northeast and this is 350 feet away from the new sanctuary. Vehicles entering and exiting the site will generate exhaust fumes but this is not unlike other areas in town where commercial uses are near residential. Modern vehicles have sophisticated anti-smog technology that greatly reduces vehicle emissions. During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed sudaces may cause NOx and PM~0 levels to exceed daily significant thresholds. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts will be at less than significant levels. 1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed project is to construct a new church sanctuary building. Nothing associated with the operation is expected to change air movement, moisture levels, or odors. There is no impact. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 6, TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) I~nadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ('/) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ('") e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ('/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 8 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The project will increase traffic trips as the new sanctuary ~s considerably larger than the existing sanctuary. However, the primary traffic will be on Sundays during church services. Omsite traffic circulation is designed to avoid stacking of vehicles entering the site on Foothill Boulevard. The impact is not considered significant. b-d) Access to the site is provided primarily by the existing signalized entry drive shared with the Foothill Marketplace to the south. A second access point is proposed west of the main entry that will serve both the site and the small triangular parcel to the west. The project will make its contribution to the frontage improvements and provide appropriate documentation to Caltrans relative to the driveway on Foothill Boulevard. With these improvements, the project related traffic will be adequately managed and accommodated. e) The project will have a gated entry oft of Foothill Boulevard but there is adequate stacking room behind the gate and provision for turn around without having to go through the gate. Bike lane improvements will be provided along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. f) The church will be dedicating land along the Foothill Boulevard frontage for a deceleration/bus lane. g) Located approximately 6 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) 0 (~') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc,)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 9 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The site has been occupied by the church facilities since 1958. No natural habitat is known to exist onsite and the property is not within the Ontario Recovery Unit, as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat. On-site vegetation consists of non-native species associated with the church's landscaping. It is unlikely that any DSF will move onto the site due to the lack of natural habitat. b-c) The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus windrow along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to accommodate the proposed improvements with the exception of the majority of trees surrounding the existing sanctuary building, which will remain. The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The presence of bordering commercial development within the area including the 1-15 Freeway (a significant barrier) has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the distant past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 8, ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ( ) ( ) (~') plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ( ) ( ) ('/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 CUP 99-56 Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability; however, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 9. HAZARDS, Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a, c) The proposed project does not include the use of any hazardous materials such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation. b) The proposed project includes adequate provisions for emergency response vehicles. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils were observed on-site. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or · illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) The site is not located within a known fire hazard area. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 11 issues and Supporting Information Sources: 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ('/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) Comments: a) The project will increase noise levels since it entails expansion of existing church facilities, thus adding people and traffic to the area. Noise will be consistent with existing levels, which includes traffic noise from the existing church as well as Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway. b) The site is subject to traffic noise from the 1-15 Freeway. The only sensitive receptor is an existing playground near the center of the site. However, this is an existing condition and no increase in student enrollment is proposed as part of the project. Freeway noise reaching the proposed sanctuary building will be mitigated by the walls and windows of the building. The impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 11. PUBLICSERVlCES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on north side of Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga and is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the project site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. Police Protection - Additional police protection is not required as the project proposes an expansion of existing operations. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 12 Schools - The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area; therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact ~ocal schools. Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities; therefore, construction of the project will not adversely impact ~ocal parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The project site is surrounded by vacant land and other commercial uses. The project will utilize existing facilities within the currently developed vicinity. Issues and Supporting information Sources: $ignilicant 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ('") b) Communication systems? ('") c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ('") facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ('~) e) Storm water drainage? ( f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-g) The project will use existing gas, electrical, and communication systems. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. The project may increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the potential for increased runoff from new hardscape proposed, but the increase is nominal because the site is already developed with substantial areas of hardscape. The project may rely on existing storm drain improvements in the area if approval can be obtained from the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the south. This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper storm water drainage per approved grading and drainage plan. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ( ) ( ) (v') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ( ) ( ) ('/) c) Create light or glare? ( ( ) (x) ( ) Comments: a) The project site is located along Foothill Boulevard and will be visible from the 1-15 Freeway. The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers Foothill Boulevard the most significant commercial corridor in the City. The street is the major east/west commercial thoroughfare and is an important part of the developing regional business area. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was developed to provide a balanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard. The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with design guidelines set forth in the Specific Plan. The project is of a very tasteful design with high quality architectural features on all sides. The building will have a high quality appearance as viewed from the 1-15 Freeway. b) The proposed design and exterior elements of the new sanctuary building will be consistent with design standards set forth in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and City-wide design policies. c) The project will create new light and glare because new and upgraded lighting will be installed. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on surrounding property and Foothill Boulevard through the use of creative lighting locations, directing light downwards/away from residence, and opaque screens. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~g,~ic,~t Irr~ect Less 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ( ) ('/) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ( ) (v') c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ( ) ('/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 14 Impac~ Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: $ignilicant d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils. The site has been occupied by the church since 1958 and most of the existing structures will remain in place. Those structures proposed for demolition to accommodate the project are not considered historical resources; therefore, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signlficanl 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely due to the nature of the use (chumh/ religious services) and its not likely to have a growth inducing impact that will lead to long term over demand on parks. b) The proposed project will not affect existing recreational opportunities, as it does not displace land designated for park development. The project will have no impacts to recreational facilities. initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga CUP 99-56 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S~gnificant 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ('") ( ) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection. with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse impacts to biological resources. The vegetation on-site is composed mainly of non-native species associated with church landscaping. The site does not contain appropriate habitat for any listed endangered or threatened species as indicated in a Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Evaluation Report. b) The project does not sacrifice long term environmental goals to achieve short term environmental objectives. Short term impacts identified in the Initial Study are related to grading and construction which can be mitigated to less than significant levels. ~,~. ~) ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 CUP 99-56 c) The project is part of the inevitable cumulative effect on the environment caused by regional growth in general, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific P~an in particular. The site has already been included in the City's General Plan as a commercial site and has been occupied by the church since 1958; therefore approva~ of the project does not cause a cumulative impact not already considered. d) Development of the Sacred Heart Church sanctuary building will not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially significant affect to the environment. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (v') City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EiR (Certified April 6, 1981 ) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that i have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur .~.)~ ~/~,~ ~/~ (~/~-')' ~ ~- Signature: ~ ]~ ~, (~ate: ~, ~/.~ ~ ~ Print Name and Title: ~ ~'. ~ ~'?~C'T~ C,, ~. ~%/~ of Rancho Cucamonga City NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for pubfic review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-56 Public Review Period Closes: December 13, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: Sacred Hearth Chumh and School Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Project Description: The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Chumh with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an addi'donal 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial distdct (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Related files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree Removal Permit 99-36. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Inifial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declarafion was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substanfial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding ara included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents ara available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. December 13, 2000 Date of Determinafion Adopted By PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FBSPA 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH AND SCHOOL December 13, 2000 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as noted on the attached Exhibits "A." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'I-I'EST: Brad Builer, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December, 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 'COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 E. Utility (FB/U). Quasi-public land uses are typically associated with public activities. Quasi-public land uses typically consist of civic functions such a public administrative offices, museums, libraries, and meeting halls/neighborhood centers, Quasi-public activities are also associated with public utility administrative offices and functions. F. Public (FB/P). Public land uses are typically associated with public transportation facilities and rights of way. Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.32.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure ouUined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Development Code. B. Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. Table 17.32.030 - Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMRi MR U !MU CC RRC MR U2 O Antique Shops P P P P P P I pi p p Apparel a) Boutiques P P P P p p P P P ~3) C-enet'st p p p p p p P P Appliance Stores and Repair P P p P P Art, Music, Photographic Studios p p p p p P P p p p4 C and Supply Stores Auto Sewice Stabon C C C C C C C C C Auto Service (including trailers. * motorcycles, boats, campms): a) Sales (with ancillae/repair facitifies) P P p P C 1 Refer to Subarea 4 Sec~on 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). Ali industoal uses and devsiopment standards sbaJI be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pumuant to 17~32.030.D. · Commercial/Office usee maybe located in the RRC dis~ct only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of aHeast 15.000 square feet per site or project, his prov~ion is intended to fac~titate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by targe scale businesses which se~e a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers pdmadly flora the neighborhood or community level. R 17.32-10 ~.~3~- ~) (,~% 6/90 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 030 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC 0 MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC I CC CO LMR MR U MU CC I:~RC MR LI2 O ~) Rentals p p p p p p :) Minor Repair (does not inclu0e major engine work, muffler p p p p p ShObS, painting, body work. upholstery, e~c) ~) Coin-op Washing C C C ~) Automatic Washing C C C C Parts and Supplies P P P P P Bakeries (retail only) P P P P P P P P P P ~arder and Beauty Shops P P P P P P P P P P P p4 p Bed and Breakfast C C C C C C C C C Bicycle Shops P p p p p p p p4 BJueprint and Photocopy Services P P P P P P P P P Book, Gift and Stationery S~ores P P P P P P P P P P P P C ~ther than adult related material) Candy and Confectioneries P p p p p p p p p ~4 Catering Establishments P P P P P P P P P China and Glassware Stores P P p p p p p p4 Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C re.. c c Establishments Cocktail Lounge(bar, lounge, C tavern) including related C C C C C C C C C C C entertainment Commercia~ Recreational: a) ~nooor usessuch as bewling p p p p p p p p p p p and billiards b) Outdoor uses such astennis C C C C C C C C C and basketbal~ Convalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P P P P P P P P P P P Curtain and Drapery Shops P P P P P P P Day Care Centers C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Delicatessens and Specialty Food P P p p p p p p p p4 Stores ~ Pharmacies a) over 10,000square feet p P P P P P b) Pharmacies with orwithout specialty retail under 10,000 C P C P C P P P square feet Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b (footnote 2). Ail ffldusthal uses and development standards shall be as prOvided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. Cornmercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC distdct only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 sq u a~l~ feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by la~ scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers p~rnadly from the neighborhood or community level 17.32-11 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 3arking Facilities (comrnemial Nhere fees am charged) Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and developrc~nt standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pumuaef to 17.32.030.D. CommercietiOffice uses may be loCated in the RRC dtstnct only wdh the concurrent development of one rnajor regionally re a ed anchor bus,ness of at least 15 000 square feet per site or pn3ject. This p~ovision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses whJC~ serve a mad<ef area significantly iarger than tb~3se businesses which draw c=Jstomem pdmadiy from the neighbOmOOd er community level. 17.32-12 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 030 Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall ha as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17 32.030.D. ed to fac. il ta e he development of arge regionally related uses Regionally Related Commemial uses am typified by largeal~lk scale bu:in e°srsPe~jwe~ich se~rv~ a rnadctn area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customem pnmamy ,,, -,~ n~. ~ 17.32-13 6/99 Section 17.32.030 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code ~ Refer to Subarea 4 Sec'don 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan redu[remente pursuant to 17.32.030.0. Commercial/Office uses may be Ioceted in the R RC dlst~ct only wrth t~e concument development of one major reg~o nay re a ed anchor b us~ness of at least 15 000 squa re feet per site o~ project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Reg[ona[ty Retated Commercial uses are ~ypified by large 17.32-14 6/99 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-56, THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING SACRED HEART CHURCH, WITH PHASE ONE CONSISTING OF A NEW 20,000 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY BUILDING AND PHASE TWO CONSISTING OF AN ADDITIONAL 2,200 SQUARE FEET OF SANCTUARY SPACE AND 5,400 SQUARE FEET OF ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE, ON 11 ACRES OF LAND IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 12704 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 24, AND 25 AND 227-221-01 AND 02. A. Recitals. 1. Sacred Heart Church and School filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 99-56, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." The applicant has also filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 99-02. 2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that' all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng on December 13, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 840 feet and lot depth of 900 feet and is presently improved with the existing Sacred Heart Church and School and related facilities; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is the 1-15 Freeway and vacant land, the property to the south consists of the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center, the properly to the east is developed with scattered buildings of vadous uses, and the property to the west is the 1-15 Freeway and vacant land; and c. Expansion of the church facilities on-site provides for efficient use of the land by avoiding abandonment of existing facilities and relocation of the church, consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policy to encourage infill development and upgrading of under-utilized land; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 2 d. The project satisfies a necessary community service in close proximity and conveniently accessible to the community; and e. The architectural design of the new church sanctuary building is of high quality and will enhance the street scene of Foothill Boulevard, which is consistent with the goal of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to provide high quality development with a unifying community design image reflective of community heritage and identity; and f. The project includes rehabilitation of existing facilities including stuccoing over the existing sanctuary to match the new sanctuary, planting of 459 new trees most of which will be 24-inch and 36-inch box size, and parking lot improvements, which will greatly enhance the visual and functional qualities of the campus; and g. The potential environmental impacts related to air quality during construction, tree removal, and light and glare can be mitigated to a level of less than significant by complying with the recommended mitigation measures; and h. The project design includes substantial tree planting and berms along the Foothill Boulevard frontage consistent with the established theme per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and i. The project includes master planned vehicular access to the vacant property to the west consistent with Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan access control policies; and j. The project preserves as many on-site heritage trees as possible consistent with the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to preserve significant environmental resources along the Foothill Corridor. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable prowsions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 3 a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Columns for the pergola connecting the northern parking lot to the sanctuary shall match those of the sanctuary. 2) Parking lot landscape islands shall have the typical oval shape rather than a sharp, crescent shape to provide maximum room for plants to grow and avoid irrigation over spray onto the parking area. 3) Provide mostly Sycamore trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with some African Sumac trees mixed in consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4) Augment the berm/Iow wall/trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with shrub planting to further screen views of the parking area. 5) All roof and ground-mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened. 6) Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting. 7) Trash enclosure shall feature overhead shade trellis and roll-up door. 8) Avoid having a double fence condition along the project perimeter. The Church shall make a good faith effort to work with adjoining property owners to remove existing chain link fence and replace with single fence. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 4 Enqineedn,q Division 1) Provide reciprocal access easement in favor of the property to the west of the project site. a) The westedy ddveway shall be as close to the west property line as possible but at least 200 feet from the curb return for the signalized freeway ramp. We do not want to give the impression cars exiting this ddveway can use the left turn pocket in the median. 2) Retain the existing 53-foot driveway width for the church entrance. 3) Development will be required to install full frontage improvements, per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, as permitted by Caltrans. We assume Caltrans will approve dimensions, which match the existing Foothill Marketplace improvements on the south side, although they may require the plans to be done in metdc. On City Drawing No. 1468, midblock lanes are 14, 12, and 20 feet wide. a) The bus bay west of the main entry shall be located as close to the signalized intersection as possible. Provide a right turn lane and drive approach for the west driveway. b) Provide additional sidewalk easements allowing the sidewalk to meander even along the dght turn lane. Parkway shall slope 2 percent from the curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk. 4) The proposed gate on the main entrance shall be set back at least 100 feet from the Foothill Boulevard curb. Provide a copy of the recorded easement for maintenance of signal equipment. 5) The Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy requires the installation of a master plan storm drain in Foothill Boulevard between Etiwanda and East Avenues and an intedm basin for said storm drain to discharge into until such time as the Regional mainline channel is constructed south of Foothill Boulevard. However, since this development is an expansion of an existing facility and the increased flows are insignificant, this development may proceed utilizing the existing drainage facility southerly, provided permission is obtained from Foothill Marketplace. 6) Upon installation of drainage facilities to the east, this development shall be responsible to remove existing temporary facilities, which discharge southerly and connect to the new facilities to the east. The extent of this work shall be reviewed in plan check. The developer shall deposit the determined amount to cover all cost of the contemplated improvements. 7) Modify the existing traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Marketplace entrance, as required by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 5 8) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Foothill Boulevard frontage. 9) Provide raised pavement markers er textured pavement to delineate lane stdping within 100 feet of intersection. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The areas of the site where raw soil is exposed shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Biological Resources: 1) The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. Aesthetics: 1) The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on sun'ounding property and Foothill Boulevard through the use of creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light downwards/away from residence. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH December 13, 2000 Page 6 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C. ucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-56 - Sacred Heart Church This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature' and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cuoamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\FINAL\CEQA~VlMP Forrn-rev.wpd MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit 99-56 Applicant: Sacred Heart Church Initial Study Prepared by: Brent Le Count Date: December 13, 2000 Air QualitY ' · The use Iow-emissions and high-energy efficiency CP/BP B/C As Necessary A 4 construction equipment. · Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment CP/BP B/C As Necessary A 4 where feasible. · Apply soil stabilizers to exposed raw dirt or to CP B/C As Necessary A 2 inactive construction areas · Sweep Foothill Boulevard of dirt tracked from CP/BO C As Necessary A 4 construction equipment · Suspend grading operations when winds exceed 25 CP/BO B/C As Necessary A 2/4 miles per hour · Plans shall state that construction equipment will be CP/BO B Prior to permits C 2 shut off when not in use BlologJcai Resources · The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate CP D As Necessary A/C 2/3 species of the largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance. Aesthetics · The project lighting shall be designed to avoid CP D As Necessary A/C 2/3 casting glare or undue levels of illumination on surrounding property and Foothill Boulevard through the use of creative lighting locations, directing light downwards/away from residence, and opaque screens Key to Checklist Abbreviations RespOnsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD - Community Development A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map Director CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal 4 - Stop Work Order (Reports/Studies/Plans) PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit 99-56 SUBJECT: New Church APPLICANT: Sacred Heart Church LOCATION: North/south of Foothill Boulevard, east of 1-15 Freeway ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimbuf:se the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2.Approval of Conditional Use Permit 99-56 is granted subject to the approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02. 3. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1.Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. SC-8 0 ' Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Minimum six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter with the exception of the Foothill Boulevard frontage. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 r, D Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4.All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 30% of trees shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15~gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. Ail private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, specimen size trees, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the /. perimeter of this proiect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the /.__ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 12. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval __/__ prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 13. On projects which abut the 1-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the __/__ freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the project. If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way. G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /.____ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. H. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: / / a. Site/Plot Plan; sc-, oo 4 'r9 Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /___/ 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / /___ the City pr[or to permit issuance. 5.The church shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be __/__/ marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 99-56). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition / / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __/__/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 4. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public __/__/ counter). L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering / / use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. /_ / 3. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." /.__/ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A __/__/__ sc-, o0 5 Project No. CUP 99-56 Com[31etion Date 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. __ 6. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. __ 7. Provide method of airborne and impact sound transmission control between dwelling units. __ 8. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. __ / M. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering __ use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2.Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application, 3. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required. / / N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City ___/ / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan, 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State' of California to / perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. _._/__ 4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1.Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 2. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 / / feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. P, Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __ Curb & A.C S de- Dr ye Street Street Comm Med an B ke Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Foothill Boulevard x x c x x x e/f Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) bus bay (f) Class II Bike Lane. sc.,o-0o ' 'r9 6"5 Project No. CUP 99-56 ComDlet[on Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: / a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a consiruction __/ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City __/ / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at ail times with __/__/__ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /.__/__ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__/__ 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in __/__/, accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with /___/__ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 5. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Foothill __/__/__ Boulevard. Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date R. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the __/ issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. S. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, /~____ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __/__ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /.__ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residentia~ projects. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be: __/ x gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 5, (b) (Table). -OR x A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. x For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __/ / and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / / if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch'riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. sc-,o-0o 8 9 Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date 4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final /.__/ inspection. 5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: / / x Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 6. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of /___ __ sprinkler system. 7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: x California Code Regulations Title 24. 8. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: x All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. 9. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: x Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). 10. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be / __ submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 11. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga __ Fire Protection District as follows: x $132 for CCWD Water Plan review/underground water supply. x $677 for New Commercial and industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 12. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC, __/__ __ UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. V. Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. Places of assembly (except churches, schools, and other non-profit organizations). NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. sc- o-oo 9 D Project No. CUP 99-56 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. __/__/__ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with /__/ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / X. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within __/__/__ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. Y. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. Z. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and __/__/ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. __/ / sc- o-oo T H E CITY OF I~ANC HO CU CA,lONG^ Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing materials. BACKGROUND: The proposed Development Code amendment is a directive from the City Council as a esSUlt of a recent appeal regarding the requirement of tile roofing material. The design policy which requires ofing matedal to have a high quality appearance such as tile (fiat concrete or Mission) can be traced back early as 1980 in the City Council and Planning Commission public hearing minutes. This policy is also reflected in many planning documents adopted since 1987, such as the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based on Council's directive, staff has worked with the City Attomey in developing the design guidelines and development standards for roofing materials. On October 25, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary regulations for roofing materials and directed staff to proceed with a code amendment. ANALYSIS: The City Attorney indicated that the City could adopt more stringent building Codes based upon the safety concerns of fire and wind resistance. However, this approach does not necessarily limit or prohibit the types of roofing materials that meet the minimum fire and wind resistance characteristics, which may include composition shingles. The City may also establish design standards including a list of higher-grade roofing materials, which are aesthetically superior based upon the City's ability to enforce the aesthetic standards required for projects. As a result of the City Attorney's opinion, staff prepared design guidelines and development standards for roofing matedal based purely on aesthetic control. They are as follows: A. Add the following criteria to Section 17.08.090D2 of the General Design Guidelines: Use roofing material made of tile, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual quality of the structure. COMMENT: The Design Guidelines of the Residential Section of the Development Code are intended to represent the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The design guidelines are specific criteria that implement the goals and policies stated in the General Plan. The addition of the proposed design criteria sets the tone for establishing acceptable roofing matedal based on aesthetic control in the Site Development Criteria section of the Code. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 00-04 - THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 2 B. Modify Section 17.08.090D4 of the General Design Guidelines as follows: Materials and Colors. Color, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character and enhance the visual quality. COMMENT: Adding the italicized words will further the purpose of aesthetic control as mentioned above. C. Add a new subsection in the Site Development Cdteda, Section 17.080.040, as follows: Roofin,q Materials. Ail new development within residential districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the Design Review Committee, if it is determined by the Design Review Committee that the roof material enhances the building design. Roofing materials for additions and accessory structures shall be governed by Section 17.08.0601f, Special Development Criteria. COMMENT: The above development cdteda is the aesthetic control on roofing material. It is focused and prescriptive as to the acceptable roofing material. As recommended by the City Attomey, the words "imitation thereof" was added to expand the choices of roofing matedal through the design review process. With advances in technology, manufacturers may invent new products, such as tile- like, or slate-like materials that have the same high quality and grade as real ones. The design review process provides a venue for design solutions and the creative use of materials. D. Add a new subsection in Special Development Cdteda, Section 17.08.060, as follows: Roofin.q Materials. All accessory structures, including, but not limited to, second dwelling units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 120 square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses, shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. The pitch of the roof for additions and accessory structures shall be designed to accommodate roof materials made of tile, slate, or an imitation thereof. Where the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition shingles; additions to the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the same materiaL Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers, cabanas, etc., that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or are not subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition singles, it shall be of architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached accessory structures not subject to public view is on the applicant, which shall be submitted for City Planner review PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 00-04 - THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 3 and approval Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses such as barns for keeping of horses or storing of agricultural equipment, may include other roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner. COMMENT: Besides having clear design criteria for roofing material for new development, staff believes that the City should have clear design cdteda for additions and re-roofing. The proposed criteda requiring tile roof for additions and allowing re-roofing with asphalt shingles represents the current practice. Staff added cdteda specifically to address the detached accessory structures because of the high level of building permits for such structures. Detached structures over 120 square feet in area are subject to the tile roofing matedal while detached structures less than 120 square feet are not. This is because detached accessory structures that are less than 120 square feet do not require building permits by the Building Code and are not subject to Planning Division review. The added cdteda will help cladfy and simplify matters for residents. A brief windshield survey of areas within the Equestrian Oveday Distdct shows that there are already existing horse barns or structures over horse corrals that have other roof material such as metal. Therefore, staff recommends adding cdteda for City Planner review of structures for agricultural and equestrian uses on a case-by-case basis. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061.  O_NDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin ~ a-'-~"~-eighth-page advertisement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the adoption of the proposed Ordinance to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF\Is Attachments: Resolution Recommending Approval RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ROOFING MATERIALS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in.iurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DCA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 13, 2000 Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. 00-04 bythe adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04, AMENDING VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ROOFING MATERIALS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 00-04, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 13, 2000 the Planning Commission, after conduddng a duly noticed public hearing and concluding said hearing on that date, adopted Resolution No. recommending approval of said application to the City Council. 3. On the __ day of __ 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public headng on , including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. · This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment No. 00-04 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A.' 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 040 P. Zero Lot Line. The dwelling unit may be placed on one interior side property line with a zero setback, and the dwelling unit setback on the other interior side property line shall be a minimum of 10 feet, excluding the connecting elements such as fences, walls, and trellises. Pools, decks, garden features, and other similar elements shall be permitted within the 10 foot setback area, provided, however, no structure, with the exception of fences or walls, shall be placed within easements required below. Where adjacent Zero Lot Line dwellings are not constructed against a common lot line, the builder or developer must provide for a perpetual wall maintenance easement of five feet in width along the adjacent lot and parallel with such wall. Q. Property Maintenance. Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of alt buildings, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, recreational facilities, and other improvements in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the surrounding area. In addition, multiple family residential developments subject to the DevelopmentJDesign Review process shall maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicable conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Commission. R. Amenities. To enhance the quality of life for multi-family development, additional amenities shall be required as follows: 1. Storaqe Space. Each unit shall be provided with a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior Iockable storage space. The storage space shall be located outside of the dwelling at grade or floor level and easily accessible by the residents. The design of the exterior storage space shall be architecturally integrated and/or compatible to the dwellings. The individual storage space units can be located within the fully enclosed garages designated for that dwelling unit. 2. Laundry Faciliht. Each unit shall be provided with a hook-up for washing machine and clothes dryer in the interior of the dwelling; or common laundry facilities shall be provided and be equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate of one washing machine and clothes dryer per five units. Common laundry facilities should be conveniently located for all residents within the complex. Common laundry facilities can be within freestanding buildings, attached to dwelling units, or within the recreation room. The design of the common laundry facilities shall be architecturally compatible to the dwellings. S. Roofing Materials. All new development within residential districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the Design Review Committee, ff it is determined by the Design Review Committee that the roof material enhances the building design. Roofing materials for additions and accessory structures shall be governed by Section 17.08.0601f, Special Development Criteria. Section '17.08.050 - Absolute Policies The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most cdticai issues associated with residential development. These include assuring neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and protection of the environment and public health. Each project must satisfy all absolute policies before approval can be granted. These policies are used in evaluation of a residential project as described in Section 17.06.030 of this Title. 17.08-26 7/OO Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 060 e. Front yard and corner side yard. No accessory structure or addition shall occupy any portion of a required front yard or corner side yard. B. Patio enclosures. Where required in Tables 17.08.040-B and C, private open space shall maintain a minimum dimension of 12 feet for ground floor units, and 6 feet for upper story units. C. Projections into Yards. 1. Eaves, roof projections, awnings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum distance of 3 feet, provided such appendages are supported only at, or behind, the building setback line. 2. Replacement chimneys, bay windows, balconies, fire escapes, extedor stairs and landings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum distance of 2 feet, provided such features shall be at least 3 feet from a property line. 3. Decks, platforms, uncovered porches, and landing places which do not exceed a height of 48 inches above grade, may project into any front or corner side yard a maximum distance of 6 feet and project into any rear or interior side yard up to the property line. D. Projections Above Heiqht Limits. Flues, chimneys, elevators or other mechanical equipment, television antennas, spires or belltowers, or similar architectural, utility, or mechanical features, may not exceed the height limits in Tables 17.08.040-B and C more than 15 feet, except as provided for in Section 17.08.060-1, Antennas. E. Roofinq Materials. All accessory structures, including, but not limited to, second dwelling units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 120 square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses, shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition singles. The pitch of the roof for additions and accessory structures shall be designed to accommodate roof materials made of tile, slate, or an imitation thereof. Where the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition shingles; additions to the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the same material Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers, cabanas, etc., that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or ara not subject to public view from streets orfrom adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition shingles, it shall be of architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached accessory structures not subject to public view is on the applicant, which shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses such as barns for keeping of horses or storing of agricultural equipment, may include other roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner. F. Equestrian Trails. All new residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area designated by the General Plan shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian purposes, to provide access to the rear of all lots. All non-residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian purposes where it is determined by the 17.08-33 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 090 e. Spacing for right-of-way widths, street sections, street radii, and intersections are to conform to the Street Design Policy available from the Engineering Division. f. Corner lots ara to be wider than interior lots. g. Relate lots and streets to one another to create neighborhoods. h. Relate development to adjacent development ralative to street design and lot pattern. i. Avoid long flag lots, key lots, and lots which side on to the raar of other lots. j. If the tract is bordered or surrounded by undeveloped land, prapare a conceptual subdivision plan for those properties to indicate that logical circulation and drainage can occur. k. Avoid double-frontage lots on interior straets. I. Four-way intersections are generally praferred over offset "'F' type on collector or larger streets. m. Avoid four-way, local-to-local intersections. n. Intersections, including knuckles, are to be perpendicular (radial on curves). o. The maximum length for cul-de-sacs is 600 feet for single-family and 300 feet for multi-family developments. p. Local streets ara to be a minimum of 150 feet apart. q. Align intersections with existing streets or provide adequate spacing between intersections. r. Only use private straets where through traffic is not necessary and whera the private street is gated. s. For private, gated entrances, provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right- of-way. D. Buildinq Desiqn. 1. Desiqn Theme. A recognizable design theme shall be established which is compatible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area (e.g., trees, landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant but that individual structures shall craate and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. 2. Architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roof line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. 17.08-53 6/99 Rancho Cucarnonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 090 Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. In particular, Low-Medium and multi-family residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation of surface treatment and architectural details. The architectural concept should also complement the grading and topography of the site. The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks well thought out design solutions which reflect the best of a particular style, respect the community's heritage, and relate well to their surroundings. The following guidelines should be considered: a. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). b. If the front of a house is sided, then provide siding to the other sides of the house. c. Consider compatibility with surrounding architectural character, including harmonious building style, form, height, size, color, material, and roof line. d. Develop individual expressions within single buildings in harmony with the neighborhood. Refrain from architectural gimmicks that sacrifice the integrity of the streetscape to a single structure. e. Roof lines are critical to the visual impact of a home. Provide roof lines which respond to the general design of other roofs along the street. f. 'Vary roof massing and/or heights on larger buildings. g. Upgrade design treatment of carport structures to reflect the architectural design of the dwelling units. h. Enhance architectural elements exposed to public view. i. Vary roof designs along rear elevations of units backing up to perimeter streets to provide a pleasant and varied streetscape. j. Coordinate exterior building design on all elevations from building-to-building to achieve the same level of design quality. k. On small lot subdivisions, avoid diverse architectural styles. Keep the design statement, materials, and details consistent. The use of mixed, incompatible architectural styles is strongly discouraged. For example, a Cape Cod style is incompatible with a Spanish style. I. Choose colors consistent with the chosen design theme. Avoid "trendy" colors which become quickly outdated. Low-key and earth-tone colors work best for primary colors; use of more vibrant colors should be limited to accents. m. Provide Iockable storage spaces for multiple family units. n. Use 2-car garages with bonus room on some floor plans or off set the third car space to avoid garages which dominate the streetscape. For multi-family projects, garages should be amhitecturally designed to compliment the residences; consider varying the door treatment on multiple garage structures. 17.08-54 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08. 090 o. One-story massing is preferred on corner side yards. p. Shadow patterns created by amhitectural elements such as overhangs, trellises, reveals and recesses, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. q. Avoid identical or similar elevation schemes plotted on adjacent lots or across the street from one another. r. Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots. s. Integrate screens for all roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than as an afterthought. t. Design roof line in conjunction with building mass for consistent composition. u. On hillsides, design the form, mass, and profile of buildings and architectural features so as to compliment the natural topography. v. Use native rock for fieldstone. Other forms of stone may be manufactured products. w. Design chimney stacks with accent materials used on the house, such as brick or stone, except on interior chimneys. x. Use roofing material made of tile, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual quality of the structure. 3. Scale. The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multiple family product type (i.e. apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adJacent to lower density single family areas. All attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family developments shall be one stor~, unless the impact of two-sto~ structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, views, and general compatibility. Buildings should emphasize horizontal as well as vertical appearance. This could be achieved by the use of projections or recessions of stories, balconies, windows and doors, and changes in roof levels and planes. In particular for multiple family product type, buildings over three stories should consider stepping back. 4. Materials and Colors. Colors, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character and enhance the visual quality 5. Siqninq. Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement, sign scale in relationship with building, and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material, and placement. 6. Equipment Screeninq. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible in terms 17.08-55 6/99 TH E C I T Y OF i~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40 - ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC - The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial building on 1.72 acres of vacant land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at the southeast comer of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491-79. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Existing Office/Light Industrial buildings; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) South - Existing Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 8) East Vacant/Public Storage; General Industrial (Subarea 8) West Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - General Industrial North Industrial Park South - General industrial East General industrial West General industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. The individual lot is currently vacant with only native grasses present. No structures or trees exist on the site. The site is located within an area identified as potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. The applicant has submitted a biological survey for the site. The street frontages along both Arrow Route and Utica Avenue are improved with curb and gutter and no sidewalks. Access to the site will be through an existing drive approach on Utica Avenue. ITEr4 F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-40 - ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC December 13, 2000 Page 2 D. Parkin.q Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided Office 2,175 1/250 9 Warehouse 24,410 1/1000(1 st 20,000) 20 1/2000(2nd 20,000) 2 Total: 26,585 31 35 ANALYSIS: A. General: The building has been designed for a single user and will be self sufficient with independent access, parking, and utility services. The building is oriented on an east-west axis, with a building setback of zero along the east property line. The loading dock area will be on the south side of the building and screened from public view. The proposed tilt-up concrete building is designed to be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding area. The proposed building design incorporates two primary building materials: sandblasted and painted concrete. Secondary material spandrel glass is being used to frame the main entrance area at the northwest corner of the building (the area visible from Arrow Route and Utica Avenue). In addition, the north elevation of the building, along Arrow Route, features sandblasted columns and spandrel glass at the northeast comer. A conceptual Master Plan has been submitted to address future development of the vacant site to the east (Exhibit "C"). B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on November 14, 2000, and recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Design Review Committee Action Comments (Exhibit "G"). C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical and Grading Committees have reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to conditions. D. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and found that the property is within an area identified as potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSF). A Habitat Assessment Survey was prepared by a federally certified biologist to assess the soils, vegetation, and species composition on the site. The habitat survey concludes that the site does not currently support optimal DSF habitat, and that the biological characteristics of the site are not consistent with areas occupied by DSF. The soil on the site is loamy and highly disturbed, the vegetation is generally dense and weedy, and most plant species indicative of high quality DSF are absent. In addition, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. conducted a surface soil evaluation of the site on September 18, 2000. Based on the results of the grain size analysis, the near surface soils at the site do not meet the criteria for the Delhi fine Sand as identified by the USDA Soil Survey. The percentage of fines is much greater than the USDA criteria for the Delfi fine sand. Furthermore, the near surface soils at the site are medium dense and lack any evidence of wind blown deposition. Neither of these conditions are considered characteristic PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-40 - ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC December 13, 2000 Page 3 of the Delhi fine Sand. Based on this information, the proposed development of the 2.96-acre site will not likely result in adverse effects to the DSF. No other potentially significant environmental impacts are identified in the Initial Study. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 00-40 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of approval with conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:RZ:mlg Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Location Map Exhibit"B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit"E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit"F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G"- Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated November 14, 2000 Exhibit "H"- Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions Location Map DR 00-40 Arrow Route Project Site parcels -__ Jersey Boulevard N 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles S \ Detailed Site Plan ,rrow & ULica 'artners, LLC II~dtl$~,~ BrI~]d~g 311 Haven Ave. Suite gO0 ancho Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucamonga, California Conceptual Master Plan ,rrow & Utica Partners, LLC l_l-ldusm°alBuilding 1311 Haven Al/~. Suite 200 ~ancho Cucslnga, Ca. Rancho California ,~,.....ou~~,,.f..o~ Conceptual Grading Plan ~dus~'~ Bu~g Arrow & U~ica Partners, LLC ~,~.~.,~ ,..~,~..... ,~,,. fl311 Haven Ave. Bulge 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucamonga, California ~, .... ~ ..... ARROW ROUTE Landscape Plan Arrow & Utica Irldustri~Build g Partners, 8311 Have--ye. Suite 200 Rancho C~onga, Ca. Rancho Cuca~ga, California North West ~ I East ~ Oontlnu~sandblast~da~ant Exterior Elevations and reveal ffzatmznt along th~ entire ~ast ~l~vztion. Arrow & Utica " Partners, LLC ~ g311 Haven Ave. Suite gOO Rancho Cueamonga, Ca. RaHc~o Cucamonga, California ~""~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Rudy Zeledon November 14, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40 - ARROW ROUTE AND UTICA AVENUE PARTNERS, LLC. - The development of a warehouse/office building consisting of 27,018 square feet on 1.72 acres of land in General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491-79. Desiqn Parameters: Arrow Route is designated as a Special Boulevard by the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan. The site is surrounded to the north and south by single-story tilt-up industrial warehouse/office buildings, to the east by vacant lot and a public storage building and to the west by a vacant undeveloped site. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. The individual lot is currently vacant with only native grasses present. No structures or trees exist on-site. The site is located within area identified as potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. The applicant has submitted a biolOgical survey for the site. The street frontages along both Arrow Route and Utica Avenue are improved with curb and gutter and no sidewalks. Access to the site will be through an existing drive approach on Utica Avenue. The project will consist of a 27,018 square foot concrete tilt-up building with an office area (2,175 square feet) and warehouse. The Site Plan and Elevations are very similar to Development Review 00-32, which was recently approved at the southeast corner of 7th and Utica. The building is oriented on an east-west axis, with a building setback of zero along the east property line. A conceptual Master Plan has been submitted to address future development of the vacant site to the east. The building has been designed for single user and will be self sufficient with independent access, parking and utility services. The loading dock area will be on the south side of the building and screened from public view. The proposed tilt-up concrete building is designed to be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding area. The proposed building design incorporates two primary buildings materials such as sandblasted and painted concrete. Spandrel glass is being used as a secondary material to frame the main entrance area at the northwest corner of the building (the area visible from Arrow Route and Utica Avenue). In addition, the north elevation of the building, along Arrow Route, features sandblasted columns and spandrel glass at the northeast corner. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The spandrel glass treatment to the northeast corner of the north elevation should wrap around to the east elevation of the building to provide visual interest along Arrow Route, which is a Special Boulevard and a major arterial street. 2. The sandblasted concrete column element and reveals, along the north elevation, should be continued around to the entire east elevation. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide decorative paving, outside public right-of-way, at driveway entrance. DRC COMMENTS DR 00-40 - ARROW ROUTE & UTICA AVE. PARTNERS, LLC. November 14, 2000 Page 2 2. To maintain a required setback of 5 feet from property line, the proposed trash enclosure location should be moved west 5 feet from property line. In addition a landscape stdp, between the trash enclosure and perimeter wall, should be provided. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to revisions being addressed with staff, prior to Planning Commission. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Rudy Zeledon The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The sandblasted concrete column element and reveals, along the north elevation shall wrap around to the entire east elevation. 2. Provide decorative paving, outside public right-of-way, at driveway entrance. 3. The applicant shall work with staff in toning down the proposed secondary (Mayan, Frazee No. DE 968 and accent colors (Cuprite, Frazee No, DE 965) of the building. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM O, o, RanchoCu.mo gaR,.n,ngO,v,.,on (Part I -Initial Study) (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Appfication Number for the project to which this form pertains: P~ect~tle: [ndustrial Buildinq Name&Addressofp~ectowned~: Arrow & Utica Partners, LLC 8311 Haven Ave., 5te. 200, Rancho Cucam0nga, CA 91730 Name & Address of developer or preject sponso~7 Same as above Contact Person & Address: Peter J. Pitassi, AIA, Architect 8439 White Oak Ave.~ Ste. 105~ Rancho Cucamonqa, CA 91730 Telephone Number:. ( 909 980 - 1361 Name & Address of person prepanng this form (if different from above): Same as above Telephone Numbe/? INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 F '~ '~'~ Page1 Onformation indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-constrection CUP's unless othen, vise requested by stall '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/'2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdma/y access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site, Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (descdbe): Southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue. 4) Assesso/~s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): Parcel I of P.M. 14457 (APN 0209-491-79) '5) Gross Site Area (ac/$q. ft.): 1.237 ac/53,893 sq. ft. 6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of pubfic streets & proposed dedications): Same as above. No dedications are required. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessam/: None 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Grading Permit, Building Permit Descdbe ~e phys~al seffing of~e s~e as # ex~ be~m ~e pmject ~duding ~a~n on topography, s~ s~bility, p~n~ and an~a~, maim tme~ tra~ and ma~, drayage couraes, and scen~ a~ects. Describe any ex~g st~cturas on s~e ~c~ding age and condition) and He use of ~e st~c~ras. A~ pho~g~phs of significant ~aturas desc~e~ In addition, s~ afl soumes of ~a~n ~e., geological anWor hydmlogic s~dies, bio~ and amheological su~eys, ~ffic s~die~: The property is vacant with only weeds present. No strun~,r~ or trees exist on the site. Street improvements for both Arrow Route and Utica Avenue are in place. Single tenant industrial buildings are on the adjacent properties immediately south. The adjacent parcel east of the project's property is vacant, as is the parcel on the west, across Utica Avenue. Due north and northwest, across Arrow Route, are single tenant industrial buildings. Northeast of the site is a multi-tenant industrial/office park. The project site is generally flat, with a 2% slope north to south. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or histodcal aspects of the site. Site all soun:es of infocnation (books, published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historial aspects to this site. 11) Descdbea~no~esou~esand~e~ve~atnowa~ct~es~i~ra~ madwayno~e,e~.)andhow~ willa~ct p~posed uses: Moderat~ traffic noise from steady vehicle use on Arrow Route, as well as Haven Avenue, 1,100 feet west of the site. No impact from either of these traffic services is anticipated. Desc~e~epmposedp~ject~ta~ ~$hou~pmvideanadequa~desc~nof~es~te~sofultima~usewh~h will msu~ from ~e p~sed p~jecL ~dicate ~ ~e~ aM p~posed phases ~r ~velopmen£ ~e extent of ~ve~pment ~ occur with each phase, and ~e anticipa~d comple~n of each ~cmment. A~ additional sheet(s) ~necessa~ A single industrial buildin~ for one tenant on an individual lot at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue. The building will be self sufficient with independent access~ parking, and utility services. A loading dock will be provided, as well as several at-grade loading doors, accessed from the south side of the site. The building is similar to dozens of individual buildings located east of Haven Avenue between Jersey and Arrow. The project will be built in one phase. Desc~e the su~unding pmpe~ies~ ~c~uding ~a~n ~n p~n~ and an~a~ and a~ cu~tu~ h~a~ ~r scen~ a~ects~ Indica~ He type of ~nd use ~s~en~L comme~ etc.), ~ns~ of land use ~ne-~mily, apa~ment houses, shes, d~a~ment s~ms, etc.) and sca~ of ~velopment ~eigh~ ~ntage, se~a~ mar ya~ e~.): All surrounding properties are within the Industrial Specific Plan. Buildings on adjacent properties are at similar size and scale to the proposed project. All adjacent properties a~e industrial use and have landscaped parkways along the street frontage with loading areas/truck access to the rear or side of the buildings. ~ll~epmposedp~je~ ~ange~epa~m, sca~orcha~c~rof~esurmunding ~ne~lamaof~ep~ject? No INiTSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ~ Page4 ~ndicatethe~pe~fsh~te~and~ng~te~n~iset~begene~ted~c~udings~u~eandam~unLH~wwi~esen~e~eve~ a~cta~acentpmpe~esandon-s~euses. Whatme~odsofsoundpmofingampmposed? Warehousing use is proposed~ with no significant noise being produced. No impact to adjacent properties is expected. '1~ ~cate proposed removals an~or mplacemen~ of mature or scen~ trees: No trees exist on the site. Indicateanybo~esofwater~cludingdomest~watersupplie~towh~hthesNedra~s: None 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage eatimates). For further cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/ind. (gal~day~ac) 1 5 0 0 ~ a 1 / d a ~[ / a c Peak use (gal/min/ac) 3 0 0 0 q a l (1856 gal/day) (3712 gal/day) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal __. Septic Tank X Sewen If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfurther cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 98 7-2 591. a. Residential (gal~day) b. Commercial/ind.(gal~day~ac) 2000 gal/day/acre (2474 gal/day) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: INITSTDI.WPD-4/96 ~ ~ Page 5 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale pdces and~or rents: Sale Pdce(s) $ to Rent (per month) 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Distdcts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementaq/: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERClAL~ INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descdbe type ~f use(s) and maj~r functi~n(s) ~f c~mmercia~~ indust#a~ ~r instituti~na~ uses: Warehouse storage with small office for administrative purposes. ~talfloorareaofcomme~ial,~dustdal, orinstitutionalusesbytype: 24,410 sq. ft. Warehouse ~,175 sq. ft. Office INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 ~[~"~ Page6 27) Indicate hours of operation: Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 o.m. 28) Number of employees: Total: Unknown at this time Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Previde breakd~wn ~f anticipatedj~b c~assi~cati~ns~ inc~uding wage and sa~aq/ ranges~ as we~ as an indicati~n ~f the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): This building is speculative and the ultimate owners are unknown, therefore, this question cannot be answered. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Unknown at this time '31) ~rcomme~ialand~dustdaluseson~ ~dica~ ~esou~e,~peandamountofa~pollu~nem~sions. ~a~shouldbe vedfied~u~ ~eSou~ CoastA~QualityManagementD~t#ct, at~1~5~-628~: Individual vehicles only. No onsite stationary sources are anticipated. ALL PROJECTS · 32) Havethewater~sewer~~re~andf~~~dc~ntr~~agenciesservingthepr~jectbeenc~ntactedt~determinetheirabi~ityt~pr~vide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All services are available and in adjacent public streets. INITSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ~1 ~ Page7 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None that we are aware of. 34) Wi~ the ~rep~sed pr~ject inv~ve the temp~ra~/ ~r ~ng-term use~ st~rage ~r dischan:Je ~f hazard~us anci/~r t~xic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment araas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. None that we are aware of. cI hereby certify that the statements fumishe~ibits present the data and infon'nation required for dequate evaluation of this project to the ~st of~y' ability, th~t~fe fac~g,/~tatements, and info/mat/on presented ara true and on'ecl tot he best of my knowledge ~ furt_~er un_ ~nd_th/al/~dditional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation canTmade/~~~monga. Title: A r INITSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ~..z~q Page8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 00-40 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial building on 1.72 acres of vacant land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491-79. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Arrow & Utica Partners, LLC 8311 Haven Avenue, Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial District (Subarea 8), Industrial Area Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North and south of the site are single-story tilt-up industrial warehouse/office buildings, east is a public storage building, and west of the site is undeveloped land. The site was previously rough graded and curb, gutter, and street pavement have been installed. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner (909} 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (,/) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Population and Housing (¢')Biological Resources ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (~') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics (,/) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resoumes (,/) Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Si~]nificance ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (¢') I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: ~ Bu~,~ledon As~sis~nt Planner October 11, 2000 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Impact Significant PotentiallYlmpact ImCect Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Sigmficant No Inco~orated Impact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) (,/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () (v') policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () vicinity? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 3 d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) established community? Comments: a-d) The site is within Subarea 8 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The use as a industrial building is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations for the area. Surrounding land uses are similar in nature. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed; therefore, no impacts will result from the project. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 2. POPULATION AND HO~ Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () (v') population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () (Z') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) (v') housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Operation of the warehouse will include both warehouse and office/clerical positions. The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing, as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. c) The new warehouse will be constructed on a vacant 1.72-acre parcel. The area is designated General industrial and there are no residential structures within the vicinity. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unle&s Than 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V') b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (,/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) (/) h) Expansive soils? ( ) (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) (/) Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site. It is not in an Earthquake Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles northwest. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 12.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Liquefaction could occur at the site if a strong earthquake coincides with an extended period of heavy rains raising the local water table. Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga-Delhi. These soils are relatively stable, but subject to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal and will create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga-Delhi (TD-DG/AR). These soils are excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans, relatively stable, but subject to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow. New structures are required to meet current earthquake standards as required by the Uniform Building Code. The Building and Safety Division will require a soils report for compaction and foundation requirements prior to issuance of building permits. The impact is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) 0 (v') ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns. A final Grading Plan will show how storm water runoff will be handled during both construction and operation. Approval of Grading Plans and conditions applied to the project by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage will make this impact less than significant. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on FEMA maps or Figure III-G/2 "Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area, as the site is not used for groundwater discharge. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially Unless Than 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, fugitive dust (PM~0) will be generated from grading the site. However, the site at 1.72 acres is below the SCAQMD threshold of 3 acres per day of grading that could generate significant PM~o emissions. Nonetheless, dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this site consistent with established grading practices. c-d) The end use of the proposed project, an industrial facility, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes er objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., () () ) (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () (/) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (,/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) () () (/) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ¢".,-, r"' ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 7 Comments: a) The project site is part of the larger Industrial Area Specific Plan area. The project is required to comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, employee/visitor parking on-site, and large truck access. Compliance with Conditions of Approval will ensure that project-related trips are less than significant. b-d) The site is a rectangular parcel with a proposed entry driveway on Utica Avenue. On-site parking is proposed west and south of the building. The building will be accessible to emergency vehicles. e-f) The proposed building will be set back from the street and will not pose a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists. g) The site is located approximately 3 miles from the Ontario Airport; the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Tr~an 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () (v') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ) () () (v') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service identifies the project area soil type as Tujunga- Delhi Sand Soils, which is a type of soil that is associated with the endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF). The site has been rough graded many years ago, which removed native vegetation. LSA Associates (biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct surveys for the DSF) prepared a habitat assessment for the site on August 15, 2000. In summary, the results of the habitat- based survey indicated that the site does not currently support optimal DSF habitat and that the biological characteristics of site are not consistent with areas occupied by the DSF. The soil on the site is loamy and highly disturbed, the vegetation is generally dense and weedy, and most plant species indicative of high quality DSF are absent. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 8 The site is mapped as Delhi series soils, and the USFWS guidelines recommend surveys for such areas. Therefore, Southern California Geotechnical Inc. conducted a surface soil evaluation of the site on September 18, 2000. Based on the results of the grain size analysis, the near surface soils at the site do not meet the criteria for the Delhi fine sand as identified by the USDA Soil Survey. The percentage of fines is much greater then the USDA criteria for the Delft fine sand. Furthermore, the near surface soils at the site are medium dense and lack any evidence of wind blown deposition. Neither of these conditions are considered characteristic of the Delhi fine sand. b-c) The site is currently vacant and undeveloped with dense and weedy vegetation present. No structures or trees exist on the site. The applicant has prepared a preliminary Landscape Plan that includes street trees as required by the Engineering Department. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) Intermittent industrial development in the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (V') plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (v') mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site, like most of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is within a Mineral Resoumes Zone for aggregate material (MRZ-2). However, due to the urbanization of the area, the State Department of Mines and Geology considers the resoume to be unmineable. Therefore, this impact is less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 9 ImoactPotentially ~mpact Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigafion Significant No 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (,/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) ( ) (v') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (,/) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing soumes of () () () (,/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (,/) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a,c,d) During a site visit on October 10, 2000, no evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils were observed. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. b) The project site is located in a developing industrial area where roads are constructed to accommodate planned land uses consistent with the General Plan. The project will not interfere with the flow of traffic on Arrow Route or Utica Avenue. Project plans will be reviewed and approved by City departments to determine adequate access for emergency vehicles. e) The project site is not located in a fire hazard area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ) (V') b) E~(posure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ) (v') Comments: a-b) The proposed project may produce noticeable short-term and operational noise as the site's proposed construction and end use includes truck traffic. The project would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. There are no sensitive receptors in the area and impacts to noise were not considered significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 10 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~..,~y u.~.s Tna. 11. PUBLICSERVlCES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, and is served by Fire Station #174 located at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. The construction of a 27,018 square industrial building is not considered significant. Police protection - Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the industrial building will not change current facility operating hours and will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled because the project site is relatively small, slightly larger than two acres. Schools - The proposed industrial building will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area; therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools. Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area; therefore, construction of the industrial building will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent will the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotBntially UnleSS 331an 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the fo/lowing utilities: a) Power or natural gas? .{~'~)..~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 11 Significant impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than b) Communication systems? ( ) (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution (/) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? (/) e) Storm water drainage? (/) f) Solid waste disposal? ) ) (v') g) Local or regional water supplies? ) ) (v') Comments: a-g) The project will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities. The proposed project will not require major modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) Comments: a) The project site is not located along a scenic highway and is small in size so it will not interfere with views of the mountains or other scenic views. b) The project is a single-story warehouse/office building that will be in character with nearby developments in the area. c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. The impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenlially UnleSS Than 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? t,"-',-'~.0 ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. The site is located in a developing industrial area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the project site. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (,/) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a,b) The proposed project is the construction of a 27,018 square foot industrial building; therefore, there is no impact on recreation. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) LSA Associates conducted a biological survey of the site on August 15, 2000, and Southern California Geotechnical Inc. conducted a surface soil evaluation of the site on September 18, 2000. The site is currently vacant and consists of dense and weedy vegetation. Most of the plant species on the site indicative of high quality DSF habitat are absent. No natural habitat exists on the site, and the property was reviewed and cleared for Delhi sands flower-loving fly habitat. No sensitive species were detected on-site and it is unlikely any will move onto the site due to the lack of natural habitat. b) Because of the size of the project area, slightly more than 1Y2 acres, and the type of use proposed, no short-term impacts were identified. c) The City has planned the General Industrial Area to include a variety of industrial and business park uses. Public services and uti!:ties are available in the area. d) No. significant adverse effects were identified in the Initial Study. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-40 - Utica Partners, LLC Page 14 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): · General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981 ) · Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) · Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 2fO9f and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review 00-40 Public Review Period Closes: December 13, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: Arrow & Utica Partners, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-491-79. Project Description: The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial building on 1.72 acres ofvacant land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: . (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support th is finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. December 13, 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE/OFFICE BUILDING CONSISTING OF 27,018 SQUARE FEET ON 1.72 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND UTICA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: APN: 209-491-79 A. Recitals. 1. Arrow and Utica Partners, LLC has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 00-40 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced meeting on December 13, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the southeast comer of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, with an An'ow Route street frontage of approximately 187 feet and Utica Avenue Street frontage of approximately 259 feet, and is presently improved with curb, and gutter only; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with light industrial/office buildings, the property to the south is developed with two industrial buildings, the properties to the east and west are both vacant; and c. The application contemplates the construction of an industrial warehouse building consisting of a 24,410 square feet warehouse with a 2,175 square foot office area, for a total gross building area of 27,018 square feet; and d. The proposed tilt-up concrete building is designed to be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding area. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and PLANNII~G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-40 ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC December 13, 2000 Page 2 b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. e. That the vacation and re-establishment of inundation areas on-site is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thero under; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations, which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Division 1) The sandblasted concrete column element and reveals along the north elevation shall wrap around to the entire east elevation. 2) Catalog cuts of the proposed outdoor amenities within the outdoor eating/plaza area (benches, tables, etc.) and construction details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, pdor to the issuance of building permits. PLANNINg3 COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-40 ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC December 13, 2000 Page 3 3) The design of the lighting fixtures and their structural support shall be architecturally compatible with the design ofthe building. Freestanding light standards shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the on-site building. 4) The trash enclosure(s) shall be designed in accordance with City Standards and shall be architecturally integrated with the design of the building. 5) The applicant shall work with staff in toning down the proposed secondary (Mayan, Frazee #DE 968) and accent colors (Cuprite, Frazee #DE 965) for the building. The revised color scheme shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 6) Decorative paving shall be provided outside public right-of-way, at driveway entrance. 7) The proposed block wall, along the south property line (between the two adjacent buildings to the south) shall be constructed using a combination of decorative masonry wall and wrought iron subject to City Planner review and approval. En,qineedn,q Division 1) Complete Arrow Route frontage improvements in accordance with the City "Major Arterial" standards as required, including sidewalk, access ramp (a modified ramp design may be necessary), street trees, and one 9500 Lumen HPSV street light. Replace R26(S) "No Stopping" signs as necessary and provide additional traffic stdping and signage as required. 2) Complete Utica Avenue frontage improvements in accordance with the City "Industrial Local Street" standards as required including driveway, curbside drain outlets, sidewalk, access ramp (a modified ramp design may be necessary), street trees, and one 5800 Lumen HPSV street light. Replace R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and R-1 "Stop" sign as necessary and provide additional traffic stdping including stop limit line, stop pavement markings, and other signage as required. 3) Revise Drawing No. 1340 as follows: a) Current standard drawing numbers shall be used. b) Relocate ddve approach on Arrow Route. c) Continue to use designated street trees shown, but add a note requiring 8-foot minimum planting areas. d) Add rockwork along the Arrow Route frontage. PLANNII(IG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-40 ARROW & UTICA PARTNERS, LLC December 13, 2000 Page 4 4) Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 5) Sidewalks shall cross the ddve approach at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. 6) Provide a drainage report for the on-site storm drain. If any inlets will be in sump condition, design shall be Q100. The parkway culvert flow line shall have a 2 percent grade. Provide right-of-encroachment for constructing a temporary inlet/desilting facilities on the adjoining property. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'I-i'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December, 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Development Review 00-40 SUBJECT: 27,018 square foot industrial Warehouse APPLICANT: Arrow & Utica Partners, LLC LOCATION: Southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __ __/ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if / building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ___/ / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan Project No, DR 00-40 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /__ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _~/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4, Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions cf Approval shall be /.__ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved /.__/__ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __/__/__ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commemiaJ and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main __/__/__ building colors. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. sc-, 00 2 Project No. DR 00-40 Completion Date 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances / / and exits shall be striped per City standards. -- 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more __/ / parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 6. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily __/__./ residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 7. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for / / commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in /. / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits er prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within / commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking ~/ / stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 /.__/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be .landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for __/__/__ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas sc- 0-00 3 Project NO. DR 00-40 Completion Date within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wails, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Arrow Route. 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / / perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / / design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 12.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the ~rinciples of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G, Signs 1..The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a pa~ of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. H, Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / / of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: __/__/__ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and-Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and sc- 0-o0 4 Project No. DR 00-40 Completion Date g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) cleady identified on the outside of all plans. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. __ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to __ the City prior to permit issuance. 5.Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/pamel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 6. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: / a. Provide a reduced site plan (8 Va" x 11 ") which indicates the non-buildable easement. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). c. Sample document is available from the Building and Safety Division. K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). /.__ 3. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A /.__ Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. /__ Project No. DR 00-40 Completion Date L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City /. / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /.__/__ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Side- Dr ve Street Street Comm Med an B ke --- Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights T~ee Trail Island Trail ulner Arrow Route ; x ; Utica Avenue Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction __ __/ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and __ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Project No. DR 00-40 CornDletion Date d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with /.__ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / / 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /___/__ accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/____ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on Arrow Route shall conform to the approved street tree concept. .__/___ O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __/ / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /__/ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. SC-10-00 7 ~"~ ~" Project No, DR 00-40 Completion Date P, General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all .~/ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q, General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer .~/_ / shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to ser~e the development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be: /.__/__ 4,500 gallons per minute, Per'97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) (Increase). -OR x A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. x For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __._/ /__ and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be __ submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of the required fire protection system. 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final ____/ inspection. 6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: / x Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of / / sprinkler system. 8. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: /.~/ x All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. x Other: roadway radius required is 50 feet outside and 20 feet inside. 9. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. / / sc. o-oo 8 Project No. DR 00-40 Completion Date 10. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear / / of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements. 11. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of pumhase shall be / / submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 12. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga /.__/__ Fire Protection District as follows: x $132 for CCWD Water Plan review/underground water supply. x $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 13. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFC /. / UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. AFl buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with / / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / S. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doom. If windows are within /.__ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doom shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. /.__ __ T. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _~/ / visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be / / a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucarnonga Police Department. SC-10-00 9 T H E C I T Y 0 F I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-61 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to construct a 49 unit, three story, 39,533 square foot senior housing facility on 1.31 acres in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street - APN: 209-041-47. Related Files: General Plan Amendment00-02B, Development District Amendment 00-03, and Development Agreement 00-02. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Parking lot and neighborhood commemial center; General Commemial South - Cucamonga Elementary School; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Senior Center, single-family houses; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) GC B. General Plan Desiqnations: North - Commercial South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Civic Community and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The site is level with a slight grade to the south and is vacant of any development or uses. Two mature Eucalyptus trees are located along the site boundaries. No unique physical characteristics are evident on the site (Exhibit "B"). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR OO-61 - SOUTHERN CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On September 27, and November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission and City Council, respectively, reviewed and approved General Plan Amendment 00-2B, Development District Amendment 00-03, and Development Agreement 00-02, changing the previous commercial designation of the site to the newly adopted High Residential District with a Senior Housing Overlay. By approving the Development Agreement, the Planning Commission and City Council favored a 25 percent density bonus, allowing a senior apartment complex, totaling 49 units, such as the subject application. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project will include a three-story, 39,533 square foot apartment building consisting of a lobby, corridors, multi-purpose room, office, support spaces, and 48 senior apartments. A manager's apartment will be located on the second floor. The apartment building will have elevator service. The apartment units are one-bedroom units and will consist of 533 square feet of living area. All units will have a kitchen, living and/or dining area, bathroom, storage areas, and private patio areas. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present. Two Eucalyptus trees exist along the east property line and are designated to remain in-place. To the north of the site includes the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and a parking area used by the City for senior parking. To the east of the site is an existing single-family subdivision. South of the site is the Cucamonga Elementary School and a parking area for the Upland Assistance League exists to the west. Site amenities involve outdoor seating benches and game tables, a barbeque grill, a community garden and rose garden, as well as a patio area and outdoor fountain. The building will include a pilaster finish, re- shawn rafter tails, beams, and outriggers, a stone veneer "field ledge," white window frames, and a concrete tile roof. The neighborhood includes a range of architectural styles and older homes. The proposed Craftsman architectural theme is compatible with the area. The buildings incorporate three different building materials such as: stucco finish, siding, and stone finish. The buildings are well articulated with vertical and horizontal changes and recesses to the building planes. Access to the site is provided by two drive-approaches located on Salina Street and Malvern Avenue, respectively. Concerns have been raised regarding through traffic. A traffic impact study has been performed and has revealed that the proposed apartment project will have a minuscule traffic impact on the surrounding area. In addition, the traffic study has also identified that there is no warrant for traffic signals at Malvern or Archibald Avenues. To further address concerns regarding potential traffic impacts, it should be noted that if the project were left as commercially designated property (which was the previous designation), traffic impacts on Malvern Avenue and Salina Street would'potentially increase to commercial levels. These levels would have a much greater negative impact on the surrounding area than the proposed Senior Apartment Project. PLANNIIqG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR OO-61 - SOUTHERN CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 3 B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (Stewart and Coleman) reviewed the project on October 17, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions which have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval. Action comments have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit "F"). C. Technical and Gradinq Review Committees: The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality and noise levels during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: A neighborhood meeting was held on October 9, 2000. One person attended the meeting. Surrounding property owners were notified of the identified meeting, flyers were distributed in both English and Spanish. The resident asked general questions regarding access and increased traffic impacts to the site. The resident expressed concerns regarding the potential impacts of the proposed development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 00-61 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Site Utilization Map · Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit"E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Design Review Report Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions Site Utilization Map Senior Ap~ents Rancho Cucamonga, California ~'""~ Parking Pro.ideal: 3.5 t~* ~'1 ,! '.,~'-'-;_ ..... __,} __ l_J~ I _~__ .... ~.-~ _.. __ __ ~-- ~.~o~,~t~ ~,~o, Detailed Site Plan Senior Ap en ts Rancho Cueamonga, California ~: ll:l~ .:.-:'::.~.2.;.2.y:':. ,..~ ~ L_ ,'.-~ Rancho Cucamonga, California Conceptual La lscape Plan Senior artrnents .................. Rancho Cucamonga, California ................ Re Sawn Rafter 'Fails, Beams, and Oulriggers .......... ~, ..... Re Sawn Rafter 'Fails, Beams, and Outriggers Tube S~eel Accent Grille over Plaster Recess ...... Slone Veneer "Field Ledge" ,' North White Window Frame ~ Unit A First Floor Plan I Bdrm.,1 Bath ~ 8oeo~d ~nd Third floor ~im. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Kirt Coury October 17, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW 00-61 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to construct a 49 unit, three story, 39,533 square foot senior housing facility on 1.31 acres in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acrs), located at the southwest comer of Salina Street, and Malvem Avenue - APN: 209-041-47. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-02B, Development District Amendment 00-03 and Development Agrsement 00-02. Desiqn Parameters: The site is generally flat with a slight slope to the southwest. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present. Two Eucalyptus trses exist along the east property line and ars designated to rsmain in-place. To the north of the site includes the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and a parking arsa used by the City for senior parking. To the east of the site is an existing single-family subdivision. South of the site is the Cucamonga Elementary School. ^ parking area for the Upland Assistance League exists to the northwest. The project will include a three-story, 39,533 square foot apartment building consisting of a lobby, corridors, multi-purpose mom and office. A manager's apartment will be located on the second floor and the building will be served by an elevator and three stairways. Site amenities involve outdoor seating benches and game tables, a barbeque grill, a community garden and rose garden, as well as a patio area and an outdoor fountain. The building will include a pilaster finish, re-shawn rafter tails, beams, and outriggers, a stone veneer "field ledge", white window frames and a concrste tile roof. Staff Comments: The following comments ars intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Replace stucco columns with wood at front lobby entrance of north elevation. Staff feels wood columns will provide mors visibility for lobby. 2. Staff would suggest using a two-tone color scheme, with darker color on base of building, to reduce height of building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to the modifications as recommended above. Desi,qn Review Committee Action: Members Prssent: Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The applicant provided an exhibit that displayed a varying use of colors that was satisfactory to the Committee. The exhibit revealed a darker color along the base of the building, with lighter colors above. The applicant also identified that the use of wood columns would not visually blend with the proposed architecture and the roof structure in fro'nt of the lobby area. The Committee was satisfied with the applicant's proposal and recommend_ed approval of the project without modifications.  ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ~o,...~oOu.mo.ga (Part I - Initial Study) Planning Division (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to~mnfbi3nth~ guidelines; ffi6Ca INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff witl.not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form · pertains: Project Senior Apartments Title: Assistance League of Upland Name & Address of project owne~(s): P.O. Box 927 Up3and, CA 91785 Southern California Housing Development Corp Name&Addressofdeveloperorp~ect ~onso~ 8265 Aspen St., #100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Peter J. Pitassi, AIA, Architect Address: 8439 White Oak Ave., Suite 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 GlO & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Same as contact person. Telephone Number:. (909) 980-136! Infonwation indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-constrUction CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundades. 2) Provide a set of color photogrephs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views int._.~o and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (descitbe): South side of Salina, west of Malvern. The site is south of the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. 4) Assessor=s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 209 - 04 ! - 47 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ~.): 1.5 a c r e s, 65,017 s q · f t. (to centerline of adjacent public streets) *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 1.31 acres, 56,848 sq. ft. ~Desc#bea~prcposed~nemlp~namendmentorzone~angewhichwouldaffect~eprcje~site ~ additional~t necessa~ A GPA and. DDA are pending which would zone the property "H" or 24-30 d.u./ac, with a Senior Housing Overlay District and a 25% density bonus. ~lnclu~ adescdptionofaflpe~ whichwillbenecessa~fmm ~eCi~ofRanchoCucamongaando~er~vemmen~l agencies~o~er~fullyimplement~epmje~ Design Review Approval, Grading Permit, Building Permit, Public Works Permit Desc#be ~e physical seffing of ~e s~e as ~ exits before ~e pmje~ including ~afion on ~p~mphy, soil s~bili~, plan~ and anima~ mature tme~ ~ and roa~ dm~a~ coupes, and scenic a~ects. Descdbe any exis~g s~ums on s~e ~duding a~ and ~ndition) and ~e use of ~e s~ctums. A~ ~otogmphs ~ ~gnificant ~atums descdbe~ ~ addi#o~ s~ afl souses of ~afion ~ e., ~ol~ical an~or hydrologic studies, b~ and a~heological suweys, traffic s~die~: The site is currently vacant. Both Salina and Malvern Streets are fully improved. The site slopes to the southwest and drainage will be via a drainage easement towards Archibald Avenue. The Cucamonga Elementary School is along the south property line. There are two mature Eucalyptus trees along the east property line. They will be retained. 10) Desc/fbe the known cultural and/or histo#cal aspects of the site. Site all sources of informa~fon (books, published reports and oral history): None we are aware of. 11) Descrfbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Normal street and vehicle noise. l~Descdbe~eproposedproject~ Thisshouldprowdeanad~ua~sc#p§onof~es~te~s~uffima~usewhich will ras~ Mm ~e proposed proje~ ~dica~ ~ ~era ara proposed phases for ~velopmen~ ~e ex~nt of ~velopment occurwith ea~ phase, and ~e anticipa~d ~mpletion ~ea~ ~cmmen~ A~ addi~onal ~eet(s) ~necessa~ The project will include a 3 story apartment building consisting of a lobby, corridors, multi-purpose room, office, support spaces, and 48 senior apartments. A manager's apartment will be located on the second floor and the building will be served by an elevator and 3 stairways. All required parking will be onsite. l~Descdbe ~e surrounding prope~ie~ ~cluding ~a§on on plan~ and an~a~ and any cultural, h~dca~ or scen~ a~ec~. ~dica~ ~e ~pe of ~nd use (msiden~ commeroia~ etc.), ~tensi~ of ~nd use (on.family, ~artrnent house~ shes, department s~ros, etc.) and sca~ ~ ~velopment ~eigh~ frontal, se~ack, roar ~ etc.): The north side of the site includes the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and a parking area used by the Cityf~ senior parking. The east side of the site is an existing single family subdivision. The south side of the site is the Cucamonga Elementary School while a parking area for the Upland Assistance League is on the west. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The building will be located along the south and west edges of the site minimizing any impact the project may have visually. Traffic and noise impacts will be minimal. l~dica~ ~etype~sho~4e~ andlon~noise~begenem~cludingsou~ea~amounL How~ll~esenoise~ve~ a~ctadjacentprope~iesandon-siteuses. Whatme~o~ofsoundpreo~gampmposed? Noise associated with construction equipment will be present. during normal working hours. Once complete, no source of objectionable noise will be present. '1 ~ ~dicate preposed remova~ an~or mplacemen~ of maim or scenic trees: No trees will be removed. l~lndica~anybo~esofwater~clu~ngdomes~cwa~rsupp~ ~towh~h~es~ dm~s: Drainage will be accommodated by local storm drains. 18)lndicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfu~ther cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distiict at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal~day) 1 g , 6 0 0 Peak use (gaEDay) 3 9 , 2 0 0 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal~day/ac) Peak use (gal/rain/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank X Sewer. If septic tanks aro proposed, attach pemolation tests. If discharge to a sanitaG' sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cla#fication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987- 2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 9,8 0 0 b. Commereial/lnd. (gal~day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 4 9 Detached (indicate ~ange of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 48 senior rental apartments. 21)Anticipatedrangeofsalep#cesand/orrents: Not yet determined. Sale Pdce(s) $. to $. Rent (per month) $. to $. 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 48 one bedroom, one bath units ! one bedroom, one bath manager's unit. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: One bedroom: one-two people 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: - 0 - b. Junior High: - 0 - c. Senior High - 0 - COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Desctfbe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commemial, indust#al or institutional USES: Total floor area of commemial, industrial, or institutional uses by 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of Total: employees: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that cun'entiy reside in the City: ~31)F~r c~mmercia~ and indust#a~ uses ~n~y~ indicate the s~urce~ type and am~unt ~f air p~~~uti~n emissi~ns~ (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distffct, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All services are available and present at the site. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB=s; radioactive substances; pesticides and heYoicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None we are aware of. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and propoced method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. eo lmreby ce~ti[y that the statements furnished above and in th~e_aff.~-d ~x~its present the data and information required for adequate uation of this project to the best of my ability, t~at/.tk~fac.~,s/, sta~rr~nts,~and information presented am true and correct tot he best y knowledge and belief. I further underetan~e~tan~h~~nfo 'on may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Ra~m~g~/~ //.,/ Title: .~'. ,~.~,~ / ~'-'~: -- City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 00-61 2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 00-02B, Development District Amendment 00-03, and Development Agreement 00-02. 3. Description of Project: A request to construct 49 senior apartment units on a 1.31 acre pamel in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), with a Senior Housing Overlay District; located at the southwest intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street. - APN: 209-041-47. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Southern California Housing Development Corporation 8265 Aspen Street, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: High Residential 6. Zoning: High Residential Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is vacant and is surrounded by existing developments. To the east, is a single family neighborhood; to the south is an elementary school; to the west are office structures, and to the north is the City's Senior Recreation Center. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (x) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resoumes ( ) Public Services (x) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resoumes (x) Utilities and Service Systems II (x) Water ( ) Hazards (x) Aesthetics (x) Air Quality (x) Noise ( ) Cultural Resources (x) Mandatory Findings of Significance (x) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (v') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Associat'e-Pla~ner November 14, 2000 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potemial~yUn~ess Than 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 3 c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") established community? Comments: a-d) The site is now zoned High Residential with a Senior Housing Overly District. On November 1, 2000, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 625 thereby approving Development Agreement 00-02, which provides more specific development controls on the site and allows an increase in the maximum density as provided in the High Residential District, up to 37.4 dwelling units per acre. As part of a High Residential District, the proposed senior apartment project is in the immediate vicinity of existing small commercial endeavors located immediately west, along with single family-residential located to the east, an elementary school located to the south, and a Senior Recreation Center located to the north. Rather than divide an existing community, the proposed project is designed to complement and expand housing opportunities for seniors currently residing within the community. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless T~an 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposah a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will include 48 one- bedroom apartment units for seniors, and one unit reserved for the resident manager. The addition of a limited number of employees will not create a demand for additional housing, as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities and the resident manager will reside on-site. Approximately 49 senior (over age 55) residents will have the opportunity for housing in an independent living environment that will be provided by the development of this project. c) The site is presently void of existing structures. No existing housing is impacted by the proposed development. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless 'man 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) (,,') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (¢') d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) (¢') e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (,,') f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) (,,') conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Rod Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2 miles northerly of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles northerly. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw7.5 earthquakes, is 12 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 14 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e) The site is relatively flat, with a slight grade to the south, and is located on the south side of Salina Street, west of Malvern Avenue. The site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project, as the site is currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading required. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga-Delhi (TD-DG/AR). These soils are excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans, relatively stable, but subject to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow. New structures are required to meet current earthquake standards as required by the Uniform Building Code. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 5 Building and Safety Division will require a soils report for compaction and foundation requirements. The impact is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless ?nan WATER, Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (-/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) (,,') hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) (-/) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) (v') water body? · e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ( ) ( ) (-/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ( ) ( ) (v') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ( ) ( ) (,,') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape proposed on a site which is currently devoid of structures. All runoff will be conveyed to Archibald Avenue (located westerly of the site), which has been designed to handle the flows, and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. b-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 6 f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .o,..,~y uo~s Tna. 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (.,') ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (./) ( ) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ( ) ( ) (v') cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. Sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NOx and PM~0 levels may be exceeded during this phase; however, with implementation of the following mitigation measures, impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels. 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with $CAQMD Rule 403. 2. Salina Street and Malvern Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 7 include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed project is the construction of 49 senior apartment units on 1.31-acres of vacant land within the High Residential District. The end use of the proposed project, intended as a residence for seniors of various income groups, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~e,~y Unless Than 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The City has several existing senior housing projects which have been found to generate less traffic than other uses which could otherwise occupy the site (such as retail, office, or multiple-family residential). Many of the seniors who live in this type of project do not own a vehicle or no longer drive. In addition, the applicant has provided a Traffic Study that has indicated that the project will have no significant impact on the surrounding area. Further, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Lastly, the project is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, and Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 8 35 employee/visitor/resident parking is provided on-site. Sufficient parking is provided in proximity to each building. b-d) The site is an L-shaped parcel with access off of both Salina Street and Malvern Avenue, and an adequate emergency vehicle turn-around area in the front central portion of the site. e-f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided. No bus turnout has been provided. g) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') Comments: a,d,e) The project proposes development within the High Residential District. The surrounding area is developed with the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center to the north, the Cucamonga Elementary School to the south, a parking area for the Upland Assistance League to the west, and a single family subdivision to the east. There is no wetland habitat on or in the vicinity of the site; and because of the development in the area, no wildlife corridors exist. The site is not identified on maps as potential Delhi Flower Loving Fly habitat. b, c) There are two mature Eucalyptus trees along the east property line. In order to protect the integrity of the existing trees, the following mitigation measure is included: All existing trees shall be retained on the site. The existing trees shall be protected during construction as required by City Ordinance. Initial Study for DR 00-61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Wouldthe ~ proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The site is not designated by State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 AND Table IV-1. Therefore there is no impact. ~-~lssues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) response plan or emergency evacuat on plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a,c,d) During a site visit on October 31, 2000, no evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils were observed. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 10 b) The proposed project will provide adequate entries to the site, including driveways on Salina Street and Malvern Avenue, to allow for emergency response assistance and/or evacuation. e) The proposed senior apartment project is located on the south side of Salina Street, west of Malvern Avenue. The site is currently vacant/undeveloped, with two mature trees along the east property line. The two trees will be retained. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans to minimize potential fire hazards. The project will not increase fire hazards within the area. ImpactPotentially Impact Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Untess Than Significant Mitigaaon Significant No 10. NOISE. Wi//the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢) Comments: a, b)The proposed project may produce noticeable project-related noise during construction, especially while classes are in session at the Cucamonga Elementary School. The project would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add senior residents (over age 55), and some additional traffic to the area. The site is designated High Residential and allows the proposed senior apartment project. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed 65 dBA, plus the limits specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall weekly monitor noise levels monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Developer shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the Developer shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The block walls along the south and west property lines shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 11. PUBLICSERVlCES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site, located on the south side of Salina Street west of Malvern Avenue, would be served by a fire station located near the corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, located approximately 1 mile from the project site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project, so no impacts to fire services will occur. Police protection - Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the 49 senior apartments will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Schools - The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to either pay the school impact fees, or obtain an exemption from the District based on the residency of seniors only. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. Parks - The proposed project will result in 49 senior apartments, an increase in population of approximately 49 persons. Many amenities and recreation facilities are also offered on-site for residents; therefore, the project will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public Facilities -The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requirements. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 12 Pot entiaily Impact Signdicant [r~pact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~n,~a,y Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor~oraled Impact 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ('/) b) Communication systems? ( ) ('/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) (v') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) (v') e) Storm water drainage? ('/) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) (v') g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ('/) Comments: a-g) The project will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler, who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill. The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site. Storm drain improvements will be constructed to direct drainage to Archibald Avenue located westerly of the site and will not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer. Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Peter~tially UnleSS Then Significant Mitigation Significant No 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) b)' Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ('/) ( ) Comments: a-b) The project is designed with an L-shaped building including an exterior courtyard. The proposed Spanish Colonial style architecture theme is compatible with the surrounding area. The site will be completely landscaped, and two mature trees will be preserved on-site. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 13 c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards. The impact is not considered significant. Potentially Impact Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P0tentiall¥ Unles~ ~lan 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site is approximately 1.31 acres. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped with two mature eucalyptus trees to remain. In the event that cultural resources are discovered during grading and site construction, the contractor shall contact the property owner and the San Bernardino County Museum for proper recovery or documentation. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially U¢11~ T~an 15.RECREATION. Would the proposafi a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ) (,/) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ) ) (,/) Comments: a) The proposed project will result in 49 senior apartments, an increase ~n population of approximately 49 persons. Many amenities and recreation facilities are also offered on-site for residents; therefore, the project will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. b) The proposed project does not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is located immediately south of the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. All surrounding property is presently developed. initial Study for DR 00-61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Ur~fess Tha, 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) (v') environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse ~mpacts to biological resources. b) The 1.31-acre site could generate fugitive dust during site grading. The contractor will be required to minimize dust generation through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval. Additional mitigation measures presented in Section 5 of this Initial Study will reduce impacts to less than significant. Noise associated with site construction will not result in a significant impact given the small size of the site and the short-term nature of the construction activity. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-61 Page 15 c) Cumulative effects of developing 49 senior apartment units may include some increased traffic within the immediate vicinity; however the impacts are not considered significant as the project is intended for seniors and only a small number of the residents will have their own vehicles. The applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees as established for all new development by the City Council. Such fees are used to make roadway improvements within the area to keep the circulation system at acceptable levels of service. d) Development of the 49 senior apartment units would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly Or indirectly. The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentially significant affect to the environment. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (,") General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981 ) (v') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (v') Environmental Assessment for General Plan Amendment 00-02B, Development District Amendment 00-03, and Development Agreement 00-02, adopted November 2000. (,") Soil Survey of San Bernardino County Southwestern Part, California; USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1972 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this.Initial St~tl.~.v~nd the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans o.~PoS~/o~r h~reby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effect~ mitigate'the e.,ffect~ to}a point where clearly no significant environmental effects ~'rint Name and Titl :~-~z~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The foflowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 2fogf and 2f092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review 00-61 Public Review Period Closes: December 13, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: Southern California Housing Development Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Salina Street, and Malvern Avenue - APN: 209-041-47 Project Description: A request to construct a 49 unit, three story, 39,533 square foot senior housing facility on 1.31 acres in the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre). Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-02B, Development District Amendment 00-63 and Development Agreement 00-02. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is. invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. December 13, 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-61 FOR 49 SENIOR APARTMENTS, ON 1.31 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-041-47. A. Recitals. 1. Southern California Housing Development Corporation filed an application for the approval of Development Review DR 00-61 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of October 2000, the developer conducted a neighborhood meeting for surrounding residents to explain their project and receive input. Residents were notified by fiyers in both English and Spanish. One resident attended the meeting. 3. On the 15th day of November 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing and approved Development Agreement 00-02, through adoption of their Ordinance No. 639, which authorizes the development of a Senior Housing project on the subject property. 4. On the 13th day of December, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heating on December 13, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Malvem Avenue and Salina Street, and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a shopping center, the property to the south is Cucamonga Elementary School, the property to the east is a residential subdivision and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, and a parking area for the Upland Assistance League exists to the west; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-61 - SO. CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 2 c. The application contemplates a senior apartment complex (49 units) on 1.31 acres of land within the High Residential Distdct with a Senior Housing Oveday District; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; a. That the development review is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The development of the proposed project will not cause a significant traffic impact on the surrounding area; and e. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and f. The design of the project will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-61 - SO. CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 3 proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: EnRineedn.q Division 1) Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded pdor to the issuance of building permits 2) Create a private drainage easement from the site to Archibald Avenue in conjunction with LLA 479. Install pdvate drainage facilities therein as determined by a drainage study submitted with the grading plan check. 3) Revise existing street plans for Archibald Avenue to show the curbside drain outlet (Standard 107-0B) for the pdvate drainage facility. 4) Widen the drive approaches on Malvem Avenue and on Salina Street per City Standard No. 101. The minimum commercial ddve approach width is 35 feet at the right-of-way. 5) Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Provide sidewalk easements if necessary. Ddveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 6) Complete all frontage street improvements, including ddve approaches, sidewalk, street trees, and one 5800 lumen HPSV street light at the middle of knuckle. 7) The developer shall file a street vacation application to vacate the rights-of-way through the curve portion to the south and west of the intersection of Salina Street and Malvem Avenue frontages of the property. Right-of-way shall parallel the back of sidewalk, 6 inches back. 8) Provide public sidewalk easement along the east property line between Salina Street and an existing gated entry to Cucamonga Elementary School on the south property line. Relocate the gate and replace fencing as needed to match the relocated sidewalk alignment. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided and maintained by the developer. Revise two existing utility pole anchors and guy wires to provide required clearances above and around the public access sidewalk, to the satisfaction of Southern California Edison. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-61 - SO. CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 4 9) Relocate the existing water vault out of the ddve approach located on Salina Street. 10) The project entrance shall have a minimum of 0.4-foot candles illumination. 11) Provide illuminated entry monument signs at project entrance. 12) Access ramps and cross walks are not allowed in un-protected mid- block conditions. Fire Protection Distdct 1) Design shall include all provisions for a "Low Rise" occupancy as outlines in RDFD Ordinance No. 32. Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources 1) Two existing eucalyptus trees shall be retained on the site or replaced with mature specimens. The existing trees shall be protected dudng construction as required by City Ordinance. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed 65 dBA, plus the limits specified in the Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall monitor noise levels weekly, monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. The Planning Division may require monitoring at other times. Developer shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The block wall along the south and west property lines shall be constructed as early as possible. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil, stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-61 - SO. CA. HOUSING DEV. CORP. December 13, 2000 Page 5 2) Malvem Avenue and Salina Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5) The contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 7) Grading Plans shall include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lam/T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review 00-61 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program DR 00-61 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring affer written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds lot other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Review 00-61 Applicant: Southern California Housinq Corporation Initial Study Prepared by: Kirt A. Coury Date: November 14, 2000 The site shall be treated with water or other soil CP C Review of Plans A/C 2 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and and routine site RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in inspections accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Malvern Avenue and Salina Street shall be swept CP C Review of plans A/C 2 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. ~Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C Review of plans A/C 2 _speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions -from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CP C Review of plans A/C 2 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall select the CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. BiOlogical Resources Two existing eucalyptus trees shall be retained on the CP B/C Review of AJC 2/4 site or replaced with mature specimens. The existing and routine site trees shall be protected during construction as inspections required by City Ordinance.. Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between CP C Routine site A 4 the hours of 8:00p.m. and 6:30a.m. on weekdays, inspections. including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed CP C Routine site A 4 65 dBA, plus the limits specified in Development Code inspections. Section 17.02,120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall weekly monitor noise levels monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. The Planning Division may require monitoring at olher times. Developer shall report their ~findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of comp ance with above noise standards or halted. The block wall along the south and west property lines CP C Routine site A 4 shall be constructed as early as possible, inspections Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of verification Sanctione CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FO - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Development Review 00-61 SUBJECT: Senior Apartments APPLICANT: Southern California Housing Development Corporation LOCATION: Salina Street and Malvern Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/__/ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __/ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code / /__ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and L__/__ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be __ / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry wails, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall / / condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 13. For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 14. For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior Iockable storage space shall be provided. SC-10-00 2 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /.__/__ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts __/___/ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and alt driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 5. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commemial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 pement of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. F, Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape amhitect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: 10% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, 70% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5.All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as sc- o-oo 3 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For muiti-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for __/ / the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / / perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. A~I walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the /.____ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. rls 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior /. / to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. H. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __/__/ of mail boxes. Mu~ti-family residentia~ developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. sc- 0-00 4 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: /.-- a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'IT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /____ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /----- 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to /___ __ the City prior to permit issuance. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /____ Building and Safety Division. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be /__ marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to /. __ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/pamel map recordation and __/__ __ prior to issuance of building permits. 4.Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5.Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). sc- 0-00 6 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering / __ use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). .___/ / 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. __/ /__ 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table _~/ / 5-A. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. ___/ 6. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the __/ construction type shall be V-1 Hour. 7. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __/____ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /.____ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the __/ / time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. /. / 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /. / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __/__./ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comrn Median TB~:~i Other Salina Street b x x x x Malvern Avenue b x x x x Archibald Avenue Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item(e) curb side drain outlet per Standard 107-B. so- 0-oo 6 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights /. on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signa~ conduit, and / / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction /__./ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City __/ / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with /..~/ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. O. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~/ / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.. P, Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / SC-10-00 7 L Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __/__/__ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be: __/__/__ 5,250 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) (Increase). -OR x A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. x For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __/__/__ and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / / if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / / submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of the required fire protection system. 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / / inspection. 6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: __/__/__ x Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. x Other: UBC. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high plied stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 7. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __/__/__ sprinkler system. SC-10-00 8 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date 8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: '/ / x California Code Regulations Title 24. 9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: / / x All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. 10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. / / 11. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. 12. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: / / x Standard Directory in main lobby. 13. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of pumhase shall be / / submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire / / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 15. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga / / Fire Protection District as follows: x $677 for New Commercial and industrial Development (per new building).** **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 16. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, UFO, / / UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained l-foot candle power. / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with / / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / T. Security Hard:ware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.--/---/ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doom. If windows are within / / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. / SC-10-00 9 Project No. DR 00-61 Completion Date Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code, The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or 2475, V. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted /.__ from frame or track in any manner. W, Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. SC-IO-O0 10 THE CiTY OF I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: December 13, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 00-30 - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION - A courtesy review of the proposed site acquisition of approximately 6 acres of land for an early education center in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 208-291-01 and 07. ABSTRACT: Under State law, the Office of the State Architect has the authority to review and approve school facilities. In order "to promote the safety of pupils and comprehensive community planning," the school district is required to solicit a written report from the Planning Commission prior to acquiring the land. The Planning Commission is required to investigate the site and detail its recommendations, in writing, to the school district. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Single family residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) South - Gas Station, Single family residences, and vacant land; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) East - Church campground; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) West - Archibald Avenue and vacant land; Office Professional B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) South -. Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) West - Office C. Site Characteristics: The site is predominantly vacant with one single family house. There are mature trees scattered throughout the property. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 00-09 May 24, 2000 Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Bernardino County Office of Education (SBCOE) is proposing to purchase the property to construct an early education center. The facility will house approximately 72 special education students, between the ages of 3 months to pre- kindergarten. Some children will be transported by bus. This project will relocate the existing Mulberry Early Education Center, presently located at 9521 Business Center Drive in Rancho Cucamonga (SWC Archibald and Arrow Route). The facility will consist of a 14,000 square foot building. There will be no food prepared on the premises. The outdoor playground will provide 75 square feet of playground area per child (same as state requires for private day care facilities). Occasional night time use would be for parental education classes. No weekend use is anticipated. No Site Plan was submitted for the development of the property. ANALYSIS: A. Land Use: The proposed school site is consistent with the General Plan policy to "organize educational, cultural, and recreational activities in close proximity to one another and conveniently accessible to their potential users." Although public schools are not subject to the City's zoning regulations, we would encourage the applicant to follow the spirit of these regulations whenever possible, particularly in architectural and site plan design. The existing home at 9782 Arrow Route will be demolished. B. Circulation: The existing single family residential neighborhood to the north, which consists of 78 homes, has only one point of access: Placer Street. The subdivision was designed to obtain its second point of access to a public street via Malvern Avenue, which presently is a stub street which terminates at the northerly boundary of the proposed early education center site. Malvern Avenue is intended to connect through to Arrow Route. C. S ecial Boulevards: Both street frontages are designated as Special Boulevards by the City's General Plan. Special landscaping features which should be included are: average landscape setback of 45 feet (measured from ultimate curb face), meandering sidewalk, and berming. D. Investiqation: The proposed site acquisition does not require Design Review Committee review or Technical Review Committee review; however, the site acquisition was investigated by the Planning Division. The following comments are offered for the Planning Commission's consideration: 1. Comply with City development standards, including, but not limited to, building, landscape and parking setbacks; landscaping, and height limits. 2. Decorative metal fencing, rather than chain link, should be used to secure the site. 3. School design should be sensitive to the guidelines of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. The school district should coordinate street improvements and access locations with the City Traffic Engineer. Preferred primary access is from Archibald Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 00-09 May 24, 2000 Page 3 5. A Development Review application including, but not limited to, site plans, building elevations, and landscape plans should be submitted to the City for a courtesy review. 6. A neighborhood meeting with surrounding residents and businesses is recommended to obtain their input prior to design. 7. Submit a lot line adjustment (Certificate of Compliance) for merger of the two parcels into one parcel. 8. The tract to the north of this proposed project needs a secondary emergency access to Archibald Avenue or Arrow Route (Malvern Avenue stub). The proposed site plan needs to address this issue prior to any approvals. 9. Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route frontages need to be improved to "Major Street" standards including, but not limited to, street lights, street trees and commercial type drive approach. 10. Sufficient off-street parking is required. No parking will be permitted on either Archibald Avenue or Arrow Route. 11. The frontage along Archibald Avenue is within Flood Zone "A." The developer will be responsible for resolving the issues. 12. There are existing overhead utilities along both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route frontages. They will be required to be undergrounded and/or in lieu fee paid per the City's "existing overhead utility requirements." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide comments which will be forwarded in writing to the school district for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC\Is Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Letter from Applicant's Attorney Early Education Center 1000 0 1000 Feot~~ S BOWIE, ARNESON, '~7ILF.$ & GIANNONE ~ ~)~_~. ~ E~C. ~EsoNBOWIE* 4~0 ~PUS D~ (~) ~ ~DA DE~ 17107 QI0.1 ..~ ~o~slox.~ coa~mo~ November 27, 2000 Mr. Brad Buller, Ci~ Plier ~~ / Ci~ ofR~cho Cucmonga 10500 Civic Center Drive R~cho Cucmonga, CA 91729 Re: Request for Repo~ on the Proposed Acquisition of L~d to be Acquired for the Mulbe~ E~ly Education Center School Site by ~e S= Bem~dino Co=~ Office of Education De~ Mr. Buller: On behalf of the San Bemardino County Office of Education ("SBCOE"), this letter serves as notice of SBCOE's intention to acquire real property for the construction of an early education center ("Mulberry Early Education Center"). Specifically, SBCOE proposes to undertake the acquisition of approximately 6.27 acres located on the north-eastern corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucumonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California ("Project Site"). The Project Site is legally described as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0208-291-7 and 0208-291-1. Site"). The SBCOE plans to construct the Mulberry Early Education Center on the Project Site to serve approximately 72 special education students. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21151.2, the SBCOE is required to give written notice of a proposed acquisition to the planning commission with jurisdiction over the Proposed Project Site, which in this case, is the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Planning Department"). Accordingly, this letter shall serve as such formal notice and request for the Planning Department to investigate the Proposed Project Site and submit a written report to the SBCOE within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter. The report BAW&G/LM/70658 BOWIE, ]IRNESON, WII.ES & GIANNONE Mr. Brad Buller, City Plarmer November 27, 2000 Page 2 should detail the Planning Department's investigation and recommendations concerning the SBCOE's acquisition of the Proposed Project Site. Because the City of Rancho Cucumonga has adopted a General Plan, this letter also serves to advise the Planning Department, pursuant to Government Code Section 65402, that the SBCOE is considering the acquisition of the Project Site for the purposes of constructing an early education center. We further request that the Planning Department report on whether the SBCOE's acquisition of the Proposed Project Site will conform with the adopted general plan as is required pursuant to Government Code Section 65402. t~is additional aspect of the Planning Department's report should include a determination of whether the zoning for the Project Site permits construction of an early education center on the Project Site. To assist the Planning Commission in its investigation, we have enclosed a copy of the Assessor's Map and which shows the location of the Proposed Project Site. We would appreciate your sending your response to this request to the undersigned at our Newport Beach office on or before December 27, 2000. If we do not receive a response by that date, we will understand that the proposed acquisition conforms to the General Plan and zoning classification for the Project Site and that the City has no recommendations regarding the proposed Mulberry Early Education Center. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (949) 851-1300. Very truly yours, BOWIE, ARNESON, WILES & GIANNONE Leonie Mulvihill LM/ad Enclosures cc: Dave Reck (w/o enclosure) BAW&G/LM/706S8 ~._~¢