Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/12/17 - Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. December 17, 1997 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo Gutierrez , and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMFNTSIPRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: November 5, 1997 (Williams absent) Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/26/97 and 12/3/97 and Payroll ending 10/30/97 and 11/13/97 for the total amount of $2,638,670.75. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1997. Approval to extend the Office Rental Agreement (CO 92-064) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Professional Baseball Club in the amount of $346.00 per month from January 1,1998, to December 31, 1998. o Approval to extend Quakes Special Baseball Agreement (CO 97- 008) for another year (January 1, 1998 - December 31, 1998). Approval to enter into an agreement with the City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency to provide production and operation technicians to operate the video production system to broadcast City Council meetings in the amount of $300 per meeting. PEG Account: 70-276-501. 9 14 15 16 City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 7. Approval to amend Salary & Benefits Resolution #97-171. RESOLUTION NO. 97-171A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 97-1 71 IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Approval to authorize the execution and signing of Program Supplement No. 021 to local agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 for emergency repair work due to Storm 93-1. RESOLUTION NO. 97-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 021 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08- 5420 FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK DUE TO STORM 93-1 Approval to execute an agreement (CO 97-058) for participation in Public Works Mutual AId Agreement No. 62170. RESOLUTION NO. 97-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT NO. 62170 10. Approval of the submittal of application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for 1997/98 Tire Recycling Grant. RESOLUTION NO. 97-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 1997/98 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT 11. Approval to appropriate $20,750 from Fund 09 - GAS TAX (A/C 09- 4637-7045) for the final lease payment for a 10-wheel dump truck. 12. Approval to appropriate $100,000 from Fund 01-4638-6035 for Development Fee supported plan check Consultant Contract Services for FY 1997/98. 19 20 22 23 24 25 32 34 35 36 City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 13. · Approval of a City policy for placement of banners within the public right-of-way for City and City-sponsored events only. 14. Approval of Map for Tract 14534, located at the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 97-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14534 15. Approval of ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 93-13, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue south of 8th Street, submitted by E & R Rancho Pacific, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 97-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 93-13 (APN: 209-211-10) 16. Approval of ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Conditional Use permit 95-32, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Archibald Avenue at 9777 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Foothill Auto Body, a California General Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 97-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-32, APN: 208- 282-03 AND O4 17. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentalion Cash Deposit for Tract 13565-5 through Tract 13565-10, located north of Wilson Avenue and East of Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation and Richmond American Homes, and release of portions of previously submitted improvement securities and transfer of monumentation cash deposit accepted by City Council on April 19, 1995, from Standard Pacific. 37 39 4O 42 47 49 52 City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 97-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13565-5 THROUGH TRACT 13565-10 AND RELEASING A PORTION OF THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND TRANSFER OF MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 19, 1995 4 55 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADJUST THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES (Continued from November 5, 1997 meeting) RESOLUTION 97-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 96-012 CONSIDERATION OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03 - CASTILLO COMPANY. INC. - A request to amend the Sign Ordinance by modifying regulations to allow for the identification of subtenants of a major or anchor tenant within shopping centers. 56 79 112 City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 ORDINANCE NO. 586 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD REGULATIONS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF SUBTENANTS OF A MAJOR OR ANCHOR TENANT WITHIN SHOPPING CENTERS WITHIN SECTION 14.20.100 PERMITTED SIGNS - COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES 124 G, PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. A RESOLUTION DENYING A TAX! CAB SERVICE PERMIT TO BELL CAB CO, (San Gabriel Transit) {Continued from November 19, 1997 meeting) RESOLUTION NO. 97-183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT DISCUSSION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION UPDATE ON RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME LOCATED AT 9204 APRICOT AVENUE 129 130 132 4. DISCUSSION OF THE ISLE'S HOUSE City Council Agenda December 17, 1997 5. PARK AND RECRI=ATION FACILITIES UPDATE PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE 1, Lions East 2. Lions West 3. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 4. RC Family Sports Center 5. Civic Center 6. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library 7. Stadium 8. Etiwanda Creek Park 9. Heritage and Red Hill Parks 10. Bear Gulch Park So COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. RC Family Sports Center 2. Vietnam Memorial 3. Senior Van Transportation 4. Teen Activities 5. Youth Activities 6. Trips and Tours 7. Senior Citizen Activities/Events 8. Human Services 9. Equestrian Center 10. Community Wide Special Events 139 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 11, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. November 5, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 5, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:18 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Manager; Kathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. David Lau, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was: Councilmember Diane Williams. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a donation to the YMCA by the Rancho Cucamonga Police and Fire Golf Toumament Committee. Danielle Stout, Rita Grant, Jim Curatalo, Jr., and Sam Spagnolo presented Diana Lee-Mitchell, YMCA, a check in the amount of $4,589.19 on behalf of the Fire and Police Departments. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to AI Hudgens of CALTRANS for his assistance with the Route 30 project. No presentation made. B3. Presentation by Heritage Hospital. No presentation made. B4. Presentation of Proclamation regarding Etiwanda Society, George Chaffey, and the establishment of the California Gold Discovery to Statehood Sesquicentennial Commission. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 2 Proclamation presented to Carolyn Hulke of the Etiwanda Historical Society. Megan Banks read information about the Charley Garcia House. B5. Presentation of a Proclamation celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Cucamonga District Host Lions Club. Proclamation presented to Jim Hampton and members of the Lions Club. Jim Hampton stated they will be having a dinner at the Magic Lamp on the 16th and invited the Council to attend. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is very grateful for the Lions Club because of how they have helped him in the past. B6. Presentation by Marcus Solomon. Marcus Solomon stated he had just returned from Thailand where he had gone to teach English to students. He stated he had also gone to Russia to the Goodwill Games. He presented the Council with the City flag they had given him which had been signed by all of his students. B7. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item 8 has a correction because four of the positions were left off the Resolution due to a computer error. He stated item F2 should be removed from the agenda and be continued to December 17. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Bruce Ann Hahn, 5087 Granada Court, displayed a map from Resolution 88-344 regarding the emergency access in Haven View Estates. She mentioned that it stated the residents wanted the levy breached and that this was not true. She stated that Mr. Cristiano was the one that wanted the levy breached. She also mentioned Resolution No. 97-159 shows that lighting district No. 2 and should only show lighting district No. 1. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, indicated this error has been caught and the Resolution has been changed to reflect the correct information. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/8/97 and 10/15/97, and Payroll ending 9/18/97 for the total amount of $1,153,255.44. D2. Approval of Annual Banner Applications. D3. Approval of an application to designate the George Cherbak House (built approximately 1929) a Historic Landmark, located at 9953 Hillside Road - APN: 1074-211-31. Related file: Mills Act Agreement 97- 02. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ, City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK DESIGNATION 97-02, DESIGNATING THE GEORGE CHERBAK HOUSE (BUILT APPROXIMATELY 1929) A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9953 HILLSIDE ROAD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1074-211-31. D4. Approval of request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax (CO 97-052) on the George Cherbak House (built approximately 1929), a Histodc Landmark, located at 9953 Hillside Road - APN: 1074-211-31. Related file: Landmark Designation 97-02. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. D5. Approval of a Resolution adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 1997/98 through 2001/02 and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/98 as required for expenditures of Measure "1" funds. RESOLUTION NO. 97-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 1997/98 THROUGH 2001/02 AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1" FUNDS D6. Approval of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 97- 02, located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive, submitted by Rudolf Wallner. RESOLUTION NO. 97-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-02 RESOLUTION NO. 97-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 97-02 D7. Approval of Resolution to adopt a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 97-053, 97-054 and 97-055) for all City Employee Groups. RESOLUTION NO. 97-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ClTY'S GENERAL EMPLOYEES MEET AND CONFER GROUP, MAINTENANCE MEET AND CONFER GROUP, AND THE SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL MEET AND CONFER GROUP FOR FISCAL YEARS 1997/1998, 1998/1999 AND 1999~2000. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 4 D8. Approval of Salary and Benefits Resolution for Fiscal Year 1997/98 and Rescinding Resolution No. 96-096. RESOLUTION NO. 97-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 96-096 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 D9. Approval of release of Cash Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $9,800.00, for CUP 95- 15, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester. Release: Cash Maintenance Guarantee Bond $9,800.00 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of items 3 and 4. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3: Approval of an application to designate the George Cherbak House (built approximately 1929) a Historic Landmark, located at 9953 Hillside Road -APN: 1074-211-31. Related file: Mills Act Agreement 97-02 DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4: Approval of request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax (CO 97-052) on the George Cherbak House (built approximately 1929), a Historic Landmark, located at 9953 Hillside Road -APN: 1074-211-31. Related file: Landmark Designation 97-02. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he wanted to acknowledge Deborah and Andrew Burger. He stated he wishes there were more people wanting to occupy historic residences in the City. Deborah Burger stated they are working on the house and restoring it. She invited the Council to come and visit them. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to approve items 3 and 4. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Williams absent). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXI CAB SERVICE PERMIT TO BELL CAB CO. (San Gabriel Transit) Councilmember Gutierrez stated he will not be voting on this issue and will be abstaining from the discussions of this matter. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 5 Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander asked if the City is receiving complaints about the taxi cab service. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated he has only received one in the last year. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Scott Schaefer, Bell Cab Company, introduced the drivers and staff of his company. He stated he felt there is a demand in Rancho Cucamonga for another cab company. He stated he did not think the average citizen would know to call the City if they had a complaint. He felt a second permit would help to make services better in the City. He referred to the SAN BAG Comprehensive Plan which was also distributed to the Council. He stated there is proof that there is a need for additional transit to various new businesses in the City, all located locally. He stated he felt they could work with Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, to assist with their community programs. He stated they would like to write an article in the Silver Fox about their services. He stated they would like to provide discounts to the seniors. He felt the existing Dial-A-Cab program was inadequate and felt they could funnel people through a taxi cab to the Metrolink. He stated they have spoken to Rita Grant of the Police Department to be a community partner with the City. He stated they have talked to Marti Higgins to assist in case there is an emergency. He stated they do not feel there is a lack of demand for more cab services. He stated they even have cab drivers that are notary publics. He stated they even do food deliveries for restaurants. He asked that the Council grant them the permit to operate. Duke Perin of Bell Cab home office, presented information about the company. He also told about the services they provide. He told about the program that their drivers go through to be able to drive a cab. He felt there was a need for an additional cab company, but that they do not want to hurt Yellow Cab Company because he wants them to be able to continue servicing in Rancho Cucamonga also. He stated they also have a computerized cab system like Yellow Cab has. Mayor Alexander asked if they have ever been against a cab company coming into an area they were presently serving. Scott Schaefer stated they did in Baldwin Park but they had four cab companies which is not the same case as this is. Mike Abreu of Yellow Cab stated he did not think two cab companies would work in the City. He felt the area would only support a certain number of cabs on the streets. He stated you might have a customer calling two cab companies at the same time and neither of them responding. He stated you would also have cabs racing to beat out the other cab, which is dangerous. He did not agree with the second permit being allowed. Gary Bemis, Villa Del Rey, felt there was a perception that it takes a long time to get a cab in the City because you don't see many ddving around in the City. He felt the second cab company would help the seniors out. Carol McLeon of Yellow Cab stated they always have cabs available in the City to make sure the customers are always served. Timothy Younger, attorney in town and a resident, stated he is not present on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. He felt things have changed in the City. He stated he would like the idea of having a cab company pick up clients on a corporate account and would like to have the choice. He stated he has used Yellow Cab and has no complaint with them, but would also like a choice. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 6 Brian Hunt, Yellow Cab, stated he did not agree that Bell Cab was interested in his welfare because they would be taking business away from him. He stated Classic Cab went out of business because there was not enough business to keep them busy. He stated Bell Cab has a lot of money and has hired consultants to help them. He stated he did not understand why the BIA was involved in this. He stated they do have corporate accounts to service businesses in the City. He talked about the complaints at the airport about Bell Cab. He stated he feels they have a good service in Rancho Cucamonga. He felt the rates would go up if there is more than one company in the City. He asked for the Council to vote no on this matter. Mayor Alexander asked about Dial-A-Cab. Brian Hunt stated he did not think Omnitrans would state they need Bell Cab for this program in the City. He stated their complaints are few regarding the Omnitrans program. Rusty Deton thanked Marcus Solomon for helping her son at one time. She stated she supported Bell Cab because they care about their people. She stated they also wear uniforms. She felt people should have a choice of cab companies. She stated her customers ask when Bell Cab will be coming to Rancho Cucamonga. She asked for the Council to consider their request. Scoff Schaefer, Bell Cab, stated they provide smoke free cabs. He stated their response time is quick and efficient. He encouraged the Council and staff to call Omnitrans about their service. Dennis Bartley stated he drives for Bell Cab. He stated he felt adequate cab drivers were important to help prevent drunk drivers from driving also. Carol McLean stated again she felt Rancho Cucamonga provides good services and does a good job taking care of things. Frank McFadden, Bell Cab Company, stated he works out on the streets with the drivers. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Curatalo stated he felt Yellow Cab has done a great job in the City and felt Bell Cab should be tried for one year and then bring it back for review. Councilmember Biane stated he agreed with Yellow Cab that another company in the City would bring more cab business into the City. He stated there is no proof to him that another company is needed. Mayor Alexander stated he did not think there was a bad service currently in the City. He felt once the new airport operations open, this could be looked at then. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Alexander to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for this application for the next meeting. Motion carried 2-1-1-1 (Curatalo no, Williams absent, Gutierrez abstained). A recess was taken at 902 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:16 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 7 F2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADJUST THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES RESOLUTION 97-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 96-12 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to continue the item to December 17, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent) G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO LOITERING BY MINORS ORDINANCE NO. 584 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.30 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO LOITERING BY MINORS Staff report by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if there are still officers at the high schools. Lt. David Lau of the Police Department, stated there are three this year - one for each high school. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the officers need to ask if they see kids loitering what they are doing. He also felt the loud noise ordinance should be enfomed. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 584 for the November 19, 1997 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). G2. CONSIDERATION OF A NARCOTICS OFFENDER EVICTION REFERRAL Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Jim Markman, City Attorney, stated this not only gives the landlord the authority to evict someone, but would also give the City Attorney the authority to move forward with this process. Mayor Alexander felt this was a good step and felt the subcommittee did a good job. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 8 There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 585. ORDINANCE NO. 585 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO LANDLORDS RENTING PROPERTY UPON WHICH SPECIFIED DRUG AND/OR GANG RELATED ACTIVITIES ARE OCCURRING MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 585 for November 19, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). No items submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF "GUESS WHO" CONCERT Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Councilmember Williams has written comments that she wanted placed in the record on this matter which is before the Council tonight. Staff report presented by Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager. Councilmember Curatalo stated he was concerned for those people that do not have proof of ticket purchase that want a refund. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that the people did get to enjoy most of the concert performance. He stated that normally when a concert is put on there is not any refunds at all and that in this particular case, the people did enjoy 1% hours of the concert. Councilmember Biane stated he would go along with the staff on this. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to offer refunds for a set period of time and that the Sports Advisory Committee come back with their recommendation to the Park and Recreation Commission and then back to the Council to decide the best way to disburse the additional funds. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). 12. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONS Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II. Councilmember Biane stated as part of the subcommittee he would like to hear what the rest of the Council would like to do. City Council Minutes November 5, 1997 Page 9 Mayor Alexander stated he is still hoping to re-open this up and that the previous Planning Commission members will still apply because of their experience. He felt the widest vadety of experienced applicants was important for consideration. He felt one more effort should be made to advertise. Councilmember Curatalo stated he agreed with Mayor Alexander. He felt the current list is very qualified, but felt there should be a larger pool to choose from. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt the Council had in the past agreed on a procedure. He felt there were applicants in the existing pool that should receive the Council's full consideration. He felt the current Planning Commissioners were informed of the process and knew how it would be handled. He stated he does not have a problem to re-open this because that seems to be what the majority of the Council wants. Councilmember Biane referred to Councilmember Williams' memo stating that she wishes the process to re- open. He stated if Councilmember Williams was here he would probably vote not to re-open this, but did not want to complicate the process. He stated he would still like for the new commissioners to be able to take their seats in January. The Council concurred to advertise this two times and give it as much publicity as possible. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn to executive session to discuss Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the Meet and Confer process. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: (.~ Z ~)h, ! II ! II & · · · · · · · ! · · ~.t. I II I I-- I II - · II ,I, II · I-- ! II · ! ~ I I :~' ! II · II · · · II · · · II · · · II & II ! · I ;.'::' I' ii · II · · !1 II II ! · · · i II I 11 I · · I,' ~J II ~ eeeeleleleeeleleeeeeee NN ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 2_ ~I,I ~I~I I~1 ~ ~ I~I I I IWI · d I I ,! · i IWI I~ 3 ImI ! · · · lB ! Id il i I II ! ! · · II · · · II · ! · · · lB · · · II ,I II m · · ! ! · 1 · ! ! · I · · · · · · ! · II · ! ! ! · I II · · · v -r o z I · eeeeeeeeleeleeeeeeleeeeeel LU z ms, ..d ..d dS ,d ,d d d d ,,d d d *d d d dS ud d d ed ud *,d uJ %. k LLJ · I I I IL I 22/09/1997 CITY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA PORT~O~.IO MA~-~'~ SU)~4ARY NOV~MBER 30, 1997 AV~AG~ ---YI]~LD TO MAT~]~TT~--- PERCENT OF AVEP~E DAYS TO 360 3&5 INVESTMEFfS ~ VALU~ PO~TI~5IO TE~M MATURITY ~9UIVALEff ~9~iYAT~ Certificates of De~x~it - Bank ............... $ 8,825,532.20 12.60 390 155 5.971 6.053 Local A~ency Inveetment Fux~s ................ $ 12,137,986.58 17.33 I I 5.627 5.705 Federa/ Agency Issues - Coupc~ ............... $ 48,897,031.25 69.80 1,684 1,216 6.429 6.518 Mortgage Backed Securities ................... $ 192,585.63 0.27 6,530 2,561 8.907 9.031 TOTA~ INVF~TMENTS an~AVERAGES ............. $ 70,053,135.66 100.00% 1,243 875 6.239% 6.326% ============================================================================== CASH Puebook/Checklng Acco~mt e ................... $ 816,985.23 1. 973 2. 000 (not includecl in yield calculatic~s) Accrued Interest at Purchase ................. $ 7,233.90 TOTAL CASH azxc~ PURCHA~]~ XIvi'~c~ST ............. $ 824,219.13 ===: ==================================================================== TOTAL CASH ax~ INVESTMENTS ................. $ 70,877,354.79 ============================================================================== ~ONTH ENDING FISCAL TOTAL EARNINGS NOV]D~BER 30 YEAR TO DATE Current Year $ 365,126.34 $ 1,846,187.91 AVERAG]~ DAILY BALANC~ ~,~z,~'CTI~r~ PATE OF R~ru~ $ 71,204,090.11 $ 71,291,632.37 6.24% 6.18% I certify that t~/s report accurately reflects all City pooled investments is in comformity with the investment Amollcy adopted Augxtst 20, 1997. A co~y of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow li~ui4/ty to meet the next six m~lt]ms estimated ex10e~c~tures. The mc~th-exu~ market va/uem were o~tained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporatio~ prlci~g service. 12/o9/1997 CTTY OF PANCHO CUCAMON~A ZNVESTMENT PORTPOLIO DETAZrR - ZNVESTM~'~';8 NOVJ~qBER 30, 1997 CITY CASH INVESTMENT AV~RAG~ PURC~U~]~ STATED --- FTM--- MATURITY DAYS NUMB]~ TSSU~i~ ~/~C~ DAT~ BOOK VALU~ FAC~ VAbUE ~ VALUB ~AT~ 360 365 DAT~ TO M~T C~RTZFICAT~S OF D~POSIT - BANK 00975 SANMA 05/22/96 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 05/26/98 176 00986 SA.~ 03/05/97 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.830 5.830 5.911 03/05/98 94 00990 SANNA 04/29/97 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 6.240 6.240 6.327 04/29/98 149 00998 SANHA 08/06/97 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.800 5.800 5.881 08/06/98 248 00999 SANWA 09/16/97 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 5.720 5.720 5.799 03/16/98 105 SUBTOTALS an~ AVERAG]~ 8,825,532.20 8,825,532.20 8,825,532.20 8,825,532.20 5.971 6.053 155 LOCAL AGENCY /~IV~STMENT P%]/~)S 0000S LOCAL AGENCY INVST ~ 00804 LOCAL AG]~NCY INVST ~ SOBTOTALS an~ AV]~RAGE~ 12,261,319.91 12,137,986.58 12,137,986.58 12,137,986.58 5.705 5.627 5.705 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.629 5.707 1 12,137,986.58 12,137,986.58 12,137,986.58 5.627 5.705 i FBD~LAG]~NCY ISSUES ~ COUPON 00964 00969 00973 00983 00988 00996 01001 00922 00940 00962 00971 00974 00982 00989 00991 00997 F~DERAL FArM CP~DIT BANK FEDgRAL FARM CliPIT BANK FEDERAL FA~4 CRY)IT BANK F~DERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CI~EDIT BANK FED~J~ FARM CP3~IT BANK FEDERAL FAI~M CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOM~ LOAN BANK FI~DI~J~T., HO!~ LOAN ~ FI~)RP, AL ~ LOAN ~ Ol/16/96 03/05/96 05/20/96 12/23/96 03/27/97 07/17/97 lO/22/97 12/19/94 04/06/95 12/18/95 o3/19/96 o5/21/96 12/3o/96 04/02/97 04/29/97 07/30/97 00957 00967 00968 00994 00995 01000 00947 00959 00981 00984 FEDERAL HOME LOAN VIORTG. CO 11/20/95 FED]~.AL HOM~ LOAN ~. ~ 03/06/96 ~H~ ~~. ~ 02/22/96 ~H~ ~~. ~ 06/25/97 ~H~~. ~ 06/30/97 ~H~ ~~. ~ 10/22/97 ~~TL~ 11/29/95 ~~~ 11/29/96 ~~ ~ ~/1~/96 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,985,000.00 6.030 6.030 6.114 01/16/01 1,142 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,987,500.00 6.165 6.165 6.251 03/05/01 1,190 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,002,187.50 6.500 6.500 6.590 05/20/99 535 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 999,687.50 6.700 6.700 6.793 12/24/01 1,484 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,018,125.00 6.620 6.620 6.712 03/27/02 1,577 1,999,375.00 2,000,000.00 2,011,875.00 6.240 6.247 6.334 07/17/02 1,689 1,995,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,991,875.00 6.350 6.422 6.511 10/22/01 1,421 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,001,250.00 8.030 8.030 8.142 12/19/97 18 942,968.75 1,000,000.00 994,062.50 5.240 7.030 7.127 11/30/98 364 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,982,500.00 6.195 6.195 6.281 12/18/00 1,113 995,212.50 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.880 6.053 6.137 03/19/99 473 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,004,687.50 7.025 7.025 7.123 05/21/01 1,267 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 998,750.00 6.195 6.195 6.281 06/30/00 942 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,010,000.00 6.540 6.540 6.631 04/02/01 1,218 1,000,312.50 1,000,000.00 1,002,187.50 6.518 6.500 6.590 04/21/99 506 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,004,375.00 6.544 6.544 6.635 07/30/02 1,702 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,492,968.75 6.290 6.290 6.377 11/17/00 1,082 1,998,750.00 2,000,000.00 1,983,125.00 5.990 6.005 6.088 03/06/01 1,191 1,985,312.50 2,000,000.00 1,972,500.00 5.695 5.867 5.948 02/16/01 1,173 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,031,875.00 6.630 6.628 6.720 01/24/02 1,515 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,002,187.50 6.450 6.450 6.540 06/30/00 942 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,003,750.00 6.320 6.320 6.408 10/22/02 1,786 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,509,843.75 7.270 7.270 7.371 05/08/00 889 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,986,250.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 11/28/00 1,093 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,988,750.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 11/29/01 1,459 1,980,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,986,250.00 6.160 6.378 6.467 12/14/01 1,474 12/09/1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PM - 3 INVESTMI~T PORTFO~.IO DI/TAIr~ - INVI~TMENTS CTTY NOV]~4B~ 30, 1997 CASH INVESTMENT AVEEAGR PURCHASE STAT~) --- TTM --- NATURITY DAleS ~ ISSUER BALd~NCIg DATE BOOK VALU~ FACE VALU~ MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT FEDERAL AGenCY ISSUES - COUPON 00992 FEDERAL NATL ~ ASSN 05/05/97 SUBTOTALS ;u~dAVERAGES 49,030,364.58 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,044,375.00 48,897,031.25 48,995,937.50 49,000,000.00 7.070 7.070 7.168 05/08/02 1,619 6.429 6.518 1,216 HORTGAG~ BA~ SECURITIES 00071 00203 00002 00069 FEDE~HOHELOANMO]~G. CO 02/23/87 FEDERAL NATLMTGASSN 09/21/87 GO%"'~:t,'~4];~ N~TIONALMORTG A 06/23/86 GOV~R/~gNT 14ATIONALMOHTGA 05/23/86 193,763.18 35,060.58 35,994.84 26,945.24 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 1,492 71,754.94 77,677.88 76,781.38 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 4,657 63,055.31 63,934.41 $0m504.59 8.500 8.621 8.740 05/15/01 1,261 22,714.80 22,269.41 2~500.45 9.000 8.534 8.652 03/15/01 1,200 192,585.63 156m731.66 199,876.54 8.907 9.031 2,561 TOTAL ZNVBSTM~NTS and AVG. $ 70,053,135.66 70,116,187.94 70,310,979.85 70,163,395.32 6.239% 6.326% 875 // 12/09/1997 CITY OF I~,NCHO CUCM, IONCA I~ - INV'g~TNENT PORTFOr-TO D~TA~T.~ - ~ CITY NOV]gMB~B. 30, 1~97 INV~STM~qT AVERAG~ PURCHASE STATED --- YTM --- MATUI~TY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER BALANC~ DAT~ BOOK VAI/~ FACI~ VALU~ MARKET VALUE RAT~ 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHECKII~/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OFAMERICA 782,871.62 2.000 1.973 2.000 00979 BANK OFAMERICA 0.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 00985 BANK OFAMERICA 34,113.61 2.000 1.973 2.000 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 893,110.23 816~985.23 1.973 2.000 Accrued Interest at Purchase 7,233.90 $ 824,219.13 TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS $ 71,204,090.11 70,877,354.79 /Z 12/09/1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA PM - 5 PORTIa)LIO HA~TIIR INVESTMEItT ACTIVITY BY ~ CITY HOV;MBER 1, 1997 - NOVII~LI~ 30, 1997 CASH STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SAT~/MATURITIES TYP~ INVF,~TM~NT # ISSU~ PAT]; DAT~ O~D~POSITS OR WITHDRAWAL~ BALANC~ C]~RTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 8,825,532.20 8,8251532.20 LOCAL A~CY INVESTMENT FUNDS (Mcmthly Summary) 0000S I. OCAL AGENCY INVST lrulND 5.705 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.707 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 1,200,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCg: 500,000.00 11,437,986.58 1,200,000.00 500,000.00 12,137,986.58 CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (Monthly S~mmar~) 00180 BANK OF/M~E]~TCA 2.000 2,983,000.00 00979 BA/{K OF/M~ERICA 2.000 00985 BANK OFAMERICA 2.000 250.00 SUBTOTALS an~ ~NDING BALANC~ 2,983,250.00 BEGINNING BALANC~: 2,813,000.00 646,735.23 2,813,000.00 816,985.23 FEDEP,~LAG~CY ISSUES - COUPON 00960 F~DERALN~TLMTGASSN BEGINNING BALANC~: 5.970 11/05/1997 1,000,000.00 49,897,031.25 48,897,031.25 MORTGAG~BAumJ~JSECURITIP.9 00071 FED]~LHOME ~~. ~. 8.000 00203 ~ ~ ~ ~SN 8.500 00002 ~~ ~TIO~ ~R~ ~SN 8.500 00069 ~~ ~TIO~ ~ ~ 9.000 SOBTOTALS and ENDING BALANC~ BEG~I~NING BA/~2tC;: $ 11/17/97 474.60 11/25/97 608.73 11/12/97 1,178.47 11/04/97 53.45 194,900.89 0.00 2,315.25 192,585.63 71,002,156.14 4,183,250.00 4,315,315.25 70,870,120.89 ====================================================================== CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 12 TO RENEW THE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INCORPORATED (CO 92-064) ALLOWING THE TENANT TO CONTINUE LEASING ADDITIONAL SPACE AT THE SPORTS COMPLEX FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve Amendment No. 12 renewing the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., which will allow for the continued lease of office spaces within the stadium building. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In July 1993, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the lease between the City and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., which allowed for the lease of two additional office spaces within the stadium. This additional lease space included rooms of approximately 157 square feet on the third floor and 189 square feet on the concourse level. A one-year renewable term was established for the lease of additional space at a rate of $1.00 per square foot per month. The attached amendment renews the one-year term of the lease established in the above-mentioned Amendment No. 2. All previously agreed terms remain the same, annual renewal, and lease rate at $1.00 per month. This amendment applies only to the lease space agreed to in the original amendment with the same operation and maintenance responsibilities and does not add additional space. The term of the lease will remain one year renewable to allow the City the ability to sue the additional space as necessary for future programming and City activities. CO 92-064 AMENDMENT NO. 12 TO LEASE This Amendment No. 12 is entered into as of ,1997, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" hereinafter) and VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INCORPORATED, a California Corporation ("TENANT", hereinafter). This Amendment hereby extends the term of the Additional Space designated in Amendment No. 2 to Lease entered into on July 7, 1993, between CITY and TENANT, and previously extended as designated in Amendment No. 5, Amendment No. 9 and Amendment No. 10. Said term to commence on January 1998, and conclude on December 31, 1998. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 11, and each and every term and provision contained therein, shall remain in full force and effect. Wherefore, CITY and TENANT have entered into this Agreement No. 12 as of the date set forth hereinabove. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. BY: Henry E. Stickney, President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Baseball Special Events RECOMMENDATION City Council Consider Approving the Renewal of Valley Baseball Club Inc. Special Baseball Agreement for Calendar Years 1998, and 1999. BACKGROUND Valley Baseball Club Inc. current lease provides them the opportunity to produce Quakes baseball at the stadium. The City and Quakes must approve any request to do a special baseball event at the Epicenter. However, the Quakes cannot modify the City's fees for any special baseball event without City Council approval. The Quakes believe that the stadium was build mainly for baseball and they do baseball very well. Therefore, they want to actively seek college and other baseball events for the Epicenter for another two years. The first year did not bring any increase in the number of special event games to the Epicenter. However, Quakes representatives believe that a minimum of two consecutive years is necessary to successfully book baseball games at the Epicenter. Therefore, the Quakes management team is requesting that City Council grant them a two-year rolling agreement as opposed to the original one year agreement so that they can book events two years out. Theirs is no guarantee that the number of special event baseball games will increase above the current level of two annual games. The Quakes have told us that they will be unable to continue doing any special baseball events including the ones we are a custom too if City Council do not approve this flat fee agreement because producing baseball special events would have become cost prohibitive. Respectfully, s~bm~tted Deputy City Manager /.5 AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO PRODUCTION OF BASEBALL GAMES This Agreement is made and entered into as of the latest date appearing opposite the respective parties' signatures below, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (herein referred to as "City"), and VALLEY BASEBALL, INC., a California Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Valley") concerning the production and presentation of certain baseball games. A. Recitals. (i) Valley is a professional baseball company established for the purposes of producing, presenting and making available to the public baseball games. (ii) City and Valley desire to make available to the public certain baseball games (other than California League games) not governed by the existing Lease between City and Valley originally dates September 16, 1992 ("special games" hereinafter). (iii) Said special games may be produced at City's stadium commonly referred to as the Epicenter (hereinat~er referred to as "Stadium") on the terms and conditions set forth herein. B. A~reement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and Valley as follows: 1. In accordance with the provisions hereof, Valley may produce up to twelve (12) special games at the Stadium during calendar years 1998 and 1999. Valley is aware of the fact that the Stadium is not available for special games on numerous dates which are preserved under separate agreements between City and Valley, as well as other organizations. Valley acknowledges that it has considered City's obligations under said Agreements. Further, dates for special games produced hereunder shall be provided to Valley on a first come first served basis with other persons and organizations seeking to reserve and utilize the Stadium. 2. Valley shall provide at its sole cost and expense all of the following services in connection with each special game to be produced hereunder and shall employ its best professional efforts in doing so: a. The creation of such special games, in consultation with City; b. The hiring training and provision of game day staff including ushers, ticket takers, parking lot personnel and personnel to perform normal game day operations; /5-/ Agreement No. CO 97-008 Production of Baseball Games Page 2 care providers; The coordination of all merchandise sales; The provision and coordination of paramedics and other emergency e. The obtaining of liability and property damage insurance reasonably satisfactory to City's City Manage (or his designee) and City's City Attorney which names City and its elected officials, officers, employees and consultants as additional insureds; f. The obtaining and administration of the performers' contracts and the payment of all fees and advances related thereto; and restroom setups; games; g. The ordering and coordination of all field requirements and concession The supervision of all Clubhouse and dressing room activities; The provision of printing and distribution of tickets for the special j. Provision of concessions food and beverage services; and 3. Valley shall pay to the City within ten (10) days following the occurrence of special games produced hereunder the following dollar amount per the following schedule; Attendance City Flat Actual Sold Tickets Fee Paid 1 000 to 1 499 1 500 to 1 999 2 000 to 2 499 2 500 to 2 999 3 000 to 3 499 3 500 to 3 999 4 000 to 4 499 4 500 to 4 999 5 000 to 5 499 5 500 to 5,999 6 000 and over 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,000 7,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 Agreement No. CO 97-008 Production of Baseball Games Page 3 The above-referenced amounts payable to City are in addition to admissions taxes due and owing to City due to the production of the special games. 4. City's duties and responsibilities hereunder shall be coordinated by City's City Manager or his designated representative. City shall provide at its sole cost and expense all of the following services in connection with each special game to be produced hereunder and shall employ its best professional efforts in doing so: a. The utilization of the Epicenter facility and adjacent parking lots; b. Normal staff maintenance needs as is customary for proper performance of said special games; and c. All utilities and sundry supplies or equipment normally associated for the proper performance of said special games; and d. Security for each event. 5. Valley agrees that it will indemnify, defend and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of Valley's performance of its obligations hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law. 6. Valley at its sole discretion shall be allowed to broadcast over radio, TV, or other broadcasting mechanisms any portion or portions of a special game without permission of City. City will permit the news media access to the Stadium to take interviews or clips of a special game without further charge. consent of City. This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred without prior written 8. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed for all purposes under the laws of the State of California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: Technical StaffinE for City Council MeetinE Video Production RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency to provide technical video production support services for the broadcast of City Council meetings in the amount of $300 per meeting. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As you are aware, the City is currently in the process of implementing a video production system to broadcast City Council meetings. In order to televise the meetings, staff must contract for technical services to operate the video production system. The City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency (SBEDA), who is currently serving as our cable consultant for this project, has agreed to provide the necessary technical video production services for a total of $300 per meeting, or $7,200 on an annual basis. Specifically, SBEDA will provide one (1) Production Operator and one (1) Technical Operator to perform the following responsibilities: system setup and shutdown and camera, tape, audio, switcher, and character generator operations. Should the City desire, SBEDA can also provide, at an additional cost, other video production services on an as needed basis, including videotaping editing, equipment maintenance, videotape duplication or special training. The cost of providing technical video production services will be paid out of the PEG Account, 70-276-501. R~tfully~ ?bmitted, City of ,¢l~n Bernre. dine Economic Development .A~!, ency Tel=eornmunioatioM~ Divmion KCSB, Channel Date: Monday, December 08, 1;J97 This is an agreement between ~i of R.a..n. cho camon a. _ . . - .......... herein refen*ed to as the c~hent, and Channel 3, herein referred to as th~ production facility. The above client has agreed to enter into a contract with the production facility to provide production services for Council meetin,-, r~roduction The production fac.,ility will provide the following services as outlined in the attached production budget estimate. For the above services the client agrees to pay the production facility a sum of ~7~,2 _O0...~r 24. meeUnas . Billa131e on a montl~ly basis Dy the Tel"ecommunications Division, Furthermore, I indemnify and hold harmless the City of San Bernardino, Economic Development Agency, the local cable operators, their employees and agents from any and all claims, known and unknown, adsing out of, or in any way connected with the above uses and representations. Client Dete Frank S. Keller Cable Television Manager Economic Development Agency Telecommunications Division ~in -Cminis~-rator" b:V'M'K::hO cmmcil centract_20.¢oc /7 City of San Bernardino ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tlme~ C. ~telnlmu~ December 8. 1997 .Cwnmme/~ · O~ce of ~ ~~t The C~y ~ San Bema~ino E~nomic ~10~e~ Agenw (SBEDA) is plea~ m p~v~e ~e cry ~ Ran~o Cu~monga ~h Coun~l Meefi~ P~u~on SeNJ~S fo~ ~n~.four (24) mmfin~ (2~ a ~.) For ~,~.~. $BEDA agrees to provide (1) F'mduction Operator and (I) Technical Operator for each meeting. All ~.xp~.n.~_~ ml~ted to the travel to and from the City of Rancho (".ucJ~mnn0n C.~[,n~l Oh;ambers is included in the specified contract amount. In the event, that City of Ranch Cur.,amDnga wishes to have additional meetings staffed by the City of San Bernardino, The City of San Beman:lino guarantees the following rates for a period of one year. (Your c. ontigure~n requires two operator; per meeting.) (1) Production ODerator at $150.00 per meeting. (1) Technical Operator at $150.00 per meeting. The following table specifies the included and excluded job functions for 8BEDA provided staff. Excluded jot) fun~ons are available to The City of Rancho Cucamonga as needed at an altcl~ional COSt, Job func~ns: E~clude~J 'functione: · $yatem setup and shutclown · Camera operations · Ta13e operations · Auaio operations · Switcher ol~erations · Character generator o~ratJons. Videotape editing · Equipment maintenance · Videotaoe duplication · Training Either the City of Ranch Cucamonga or the City of Sen Bemardino E,D.A. may terminate this contract agreement by submitting 30 days written notice. The 88EDA will invoice the City of Rancho Cuc, amon;ta on a monthly basis for se~/ices rendered. Tim McCuloul;ih, Telec, ommuni~dons Technical Coo~inato¢, will ac~ as the oontract administrator on behalf of the SBEDA. He will wo~ directly with designated City of Rancho Cucamonga staff to flmil'Aate this agreement On Behalf of SBEDA: On Behalf of The City of Rancho Cuc~monga; suite 301 · sen Bemard~. California ~40~.1507 , (90~) ,.~4-50~1 · (~00) 232-1267 o FAX (909) 888-~13 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council, City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 97-171A RECOMMENDATION That City Council approve Resolution 97-171A amending Resolution 97-171. BACKGROUND On November 5, 1997 Resolution 97-171 was brought before City Council for approval. At that time several position titles were inadvertently not printed, printed incorrectly, or not assigned to the correct range. Listed here are the existing positions/titles that should be included in the salary resolution. These positions include Records Clerk, Accounts Payable Supervisor, Planning Commission Secretary, Information Systems Specialist, and Sr Information Systems Analyst. The attached Resolution 97-171A amends the previous resolution and includes the listed positions: Records Clerk Accounts Payable Supervisor (delete) Planning Commission Secretary Information Systems Specialist Senior Information Systems Analyst Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Attach. RESOLUTION NO. 97-171A a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 97-171 IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 WHEREAS, salary and benefit policies are necessary for the operation and management of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; Cucamonga, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho California, as follow that the attched positions are amended. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of December, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of December, 1997. Executed this 17th day of December, 1997 Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ~ 0 ~ 0 0 > c 0 0 0 C c c c C .-~ c o T: .-~ 0o o~_ E0 0 c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 021 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420 FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK DUE TO STORM 93-1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the execution and signing of Program Supplement No. 021 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 for emergency repair work due to storm 93-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Approval of this Resolution will complete the documentation necessary for the City's application for Federal Aid for the reimbursement of $70,000. This reimbursement is due to the City for emergency repairs completed by the City at various locations during a 1993 storm. Respectfully submitted, William j( J~OO Neil~7~ City Engineer WJO:MD Attachments: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. q 7- / ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 021 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420 FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK DUE TO STORM 93-1 WHEREAS, the CRy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "Local Agency"), has for its consideration and execution, the Program Supplement No. 021 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 for the emergency repair work at various locations within Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, (hereinafter referred to as "State") processes and monitors Federally funded projects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to payment of federal funds for said projects, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 021; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Authorize the execution of Supplement No. 021 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 for emergency repair work at various locations due to storm 93-1 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. To authorize the City Manager to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the Resolution number and date in the blank of the third block of said Supplement and for the return of the original copies of said Supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the certified copy of this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT NO. 62170. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the execution of an agreement for participation in Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement No. 62170. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1989, the Counties of Orange and Los Angeles entered into a Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement. The purpose of the agreement is to implement procedures of the agencies whenever emergency personnel, equipment and facility assistance is provided fxom one Public Works Department to another. Included in this agreement was the condition that any other qualified public works agency may become a party to the agreement by executing a duplicate copy of the agreement. In 1990, the County of San Bernardino executed, and therefore became a party to, this agreement. By executing and participating in the agreement, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will join other communities in implementing the attached plan that sets forth procedures and responsibilities for the parties whenever emergency assistance is shared. It will be beneficial to the City to have this agreement in place at this time because, in the event of a local emergency, we will be able to share necessary resources with other participating communities. Our ability to respond to emergency situations will be enhanced because the details and decisions related to sharing resources, including liability issues and the coordination of responsibilities among agencies, will already be in place. The attached Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attomey. Respect_fully su, bmitt~.~ Will J~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MD Attachments: Additional Parities to Agreement for Execution Copy of Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement No. 62170 RESOLUTION NO. q 7 -/~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT NO. 62170 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration and execution, the Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement No. 62170 for the emergency repair work at various locations within Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino have entered into said agreement setting forth procedures and responsibilities of the participating parties whenever emergency personnel, equipment, and facility assistance is provided from one party to the other; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enter into said agreement and participate in the plan when a Local Emergency has been declared; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approve the execution of Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement No. 62170. Authorize the Mayor to sign Additional Parities to Agreement and direct the City Clerk to attest said document. PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID ~GREEMENT ORIGINAL This Mutual Aid Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by those parties who have adopted and signed thts Agreement. WHEREAS, the California Office of Emergency Services, the League of California Cities, the County Supervisors Association of California, and the American Public Works Association have expressed a mutual interest in the establishment of a plan to facilitate and encourage public works mutual aid agreements between political subdivisions throughout California; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it would be in their best interests to enter into an agreement that implements that plan and sets forth procedures and the responsibilities of the parties whenever emergency personnel, equipment and facility assistance is provided from one party's Public Works Department to the other; and WHEREAS, no party should be in a position of depleting unreasonably its own resources, facilities, or services providing such mutual aid; and WHEREAS, such an agreement is in accord with the California Emergency Services Act set forth in Title 2, Division 1, Chapter 7 (Section 8550 et seq.) of the Government Code and specifically with Article 14 (Section 8630 et seq.) of the Act. .. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. For this Agreement, the following terms shall be ascribed the following me~t~gs¥' " ao "Coordtnaton" shall mean the person designated by each party to act on behalf of that party on all matters relative to mutual aid, to include but not be limited to requests, responses, and reimbursement. be "Local Emergency" shall mean the actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons or property within the'territorial ltmlts of one of the parties caused by human or natural conditions such as alr pollution, fire, flood, storm, wind, earthquake, explosion, transportation accident, hazard- ous material problem, tsunamt, sudden or severe energy shortage, epidemic, riot or other occurrences, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which occurrences, or the irrrnediate threat thereof, are likely to be beyond the control of the personnel, equipment, or facilities of that party to-this Agreement and which personnel, eqcipment or facilities of the other party are therefore desired to combat. An "Operational Area" for the coordination of public works mutual aid shall normally be a County and all the ]urisdictlons within the County that are parties to this Agreement A different public works opera- tional area may be established by the parties in some unique cases. Coordinators designated by each party shall be designated by Title, Name, Address and Phone Number, and if said Coordinator changes, the other parties of the Agreement shall be notifted in wrttlng as soon as practical after the appointment has been made through the Agreement Coordinator. designated In Paragraph t8 hereinafter. When a Local Emergency has been proclaimed by party's governing body or authorized official, the Coordinator may request assistance. 4. When request for assistance is received, the assisting Coordinator shall promptly advise of the extent of response, provide whatever personnel, equipment, and/or facilities as can be provided without Jeopardizing the safety of.persons or property within their Jurisdiction. No party receivtng.a request for assistance shall be under any obligation to provide assistance or incur any liability for not complying wlth the request~ .. '. 5. When the assisting Coordlnator's personnel, equipment, and/or facil- Ities are no longer required or when assisting Coordinator advises that the resources are required within their own jurisdiction, the requestl.ng Coordinator shall Immediately arrange for the return of those resources. Requesting party shall be responsible for the safekeepino of the resources provided by the assisting party. Requesting Coordinator shall remain in charge of the incident or occurrence and shall provide control and direction to the resources provided by the assisting party. The request may include for providing supervisory personnel to take d~rect charge of the resources under the general direction of the requesting Coordinator. Requesting Coordinator shall make arrange- ments for housing 'and feedtng, assisting personnel, fueling, servicing, and repair of equipment if such support ls requested by assisting Coordinator. Assisting party's personnel shall not be deemed employees of requesting party and vice versa. TEe ~equesti~g p-~-~-Ety-~g'~e'es to--pay all direct, Indirect, administra- tive and contracted costs of assisting party Incurred as a result o[ providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement, based upon standard rates applicable to assisting party's Internal operations. Payment shall be made wJthln sixty (60) days after receipt of a detailed invoice. Requesting party shall not assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary or wages to any offlcer or employee of assisting party. Requesting party shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the assisting party, .its officers, agents, and employees against all lia- bility,' claims, losses, demands or actions for Injury to, er death of, a person or persons, or damages to property arising out of, or alleged to arise out of or in consequence of, this Agreement provided such liability, claims, losses, demands, or actions are claimed to be due to the acts or omissions of the requesting party, its officers, agents, or employees, or employees of the assisting party working under the direction and control of the requesting party when the act or omtsslon of such assisting party employee occurs or ts alleged to occur wlthln the scope of employment under the directlon and contro~ of the requesting party. When mutual a~d ~s provided, the requesting and assisting agencies, will keep account records of the personnel, equipment, and materials provided as required by Federal and State (NOAA) and FEHA guidelines to maxlmlze the possibility of Federal and State disaster reimbursement. Each party shall have access to other party's records for thts purpose. 10. 11. Agreement shall take effect immediately 'upon its execution and shall remain in effect until terminated. Any party may withdraw from agreement without cause upon delivery of sixty {60) days prior written notice to the Agreement Coordinator designated in Paragraph 18 hereinafter. 12. To the extent.that they are inconsistent with this agreement all prior agreements for public works mutual aid between the parties hereto are hereby null ahd void. 13. Requests for' mutual' aid assistance under this Agreement when more than one County is impacted by a disaster, should be channeled ,. through the appropriate Regional State Office of Emergency Services to ensure maximum effectiveness in allocating resources to the highest priority needs. 14. 15. Requests for Public Works assistance from outside of an operational area should be channeled through the authorized emergency management organizations for the requesting and providing parties' operational areas. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association and Judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having Jurisdiction thereof. 16. This Agreement in no way acts to abrogate or walve any inTnunity available under the Tort Claims Act. .17. Initial signatories to this Agreement are: 18. Los Angeles County Orange County The County of Los Angeles shall act as the initial Agreement coordinator of this program for the purpose of: a. Receipt of new members to the Agreement. b. Hainraining a current list of signatory parties and representatives. c. Circulating annually a list of all parties and Representatives to all signatory parties. d. Arranging for amendments to agreement as may be necessary. The party acting as Agreement Coordinator may transfer these responsi- bilities to another party with the consent of that pa~-ty and upon notification of the other parties to the Agreement. 19. All signatory parties agree ~h~t any other qualified public agency or quasi public agency may become a party to this agreement by executing a duplicate copy of this agreement and sending same to the Agreement Coordinator, initially the County of Los Angeles, addressed as follows: The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 Attention:. Disaster Services Coordinator IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their .duly authorized officers on the dates hereinafter indicated. L~' ~-4"'"~-' ~" ' '~'~.. ]~ ~:~-Y.~)+~-OS ANGELES COUNTY Executive Officer-Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ~ " ..... ' DEPUTY CHA[RMA~, BOARD OF SUPERV[SORS ATTEST SICNED AND CERTIFIED TI~T A COPY OF THIS DOC~NT }~S BEEN DELIVERED TO THE'. C~\I~.[AN OF THE BOARD. LINDA D. RUTH j~ CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF OR/uNCE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVED AS TO FORM OeWitt W. Clinton County Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORJR: ADRIAN KLFfPER, COUNTY COUNSEL ORANGE COUNI-Y, CALIFORNIA Deputy R-MCPW ORANGE COUNTY C-~fCU~vf O;f;cr~ PUBLIC ~DRKS MLTI~3AL AID A~Z~~ (NO. 62170) IN WITNESS I~{EREOF, the parities hereto have executed tkis agreement by their duly authorized officers on the dates hereinafter indicmted. m~RS OF ~ AUG 2 7 1990 CIk~K OF THE BOARD OF SUFERX~~ OF SAN B~q~O.D~ CCUNTY, CALII=ORNIA DSP,/I"Y '"' / PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT (NO. 62170) ADDITIONAL PARITIES TO AGREEMENT IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parities hereto have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers on the dates hereinafter indicated. BY William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST Debra J. Adams, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM JAMES L. MARKMAN, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 1997/98 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT RECOMMENDATION: Approval by the City Council to submit an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for a 1997/98 Tire Recycling Grant for the purpose of purchasing and installing resilient surfacing underneath and around play equipment. BACKGROUND: The Public Resources Code Section 42860 et. seq. authorizes the California Integrated Waste Management Board's Tire Recycling Program to expend funds for grants from the California Tire Recycling Management Fund. Grants funded by the Tire Recycling Program are intended to divert tires from disposal in California landfills by promoting recycling and market development activities. The Tire Recycling Grant Program is funded by a $0.25 tire fee that is assessed on tire sales at tire dealers. Eligible grant applicants include California cities, counties and their subdivisions, as well as school districts, which can demonstrate the implementation of a recycling program prior to January, 1997, for at least three of the following materials: Paper, plastic, glass, old corrugated cardboard, aluminum, ferrous metals, newspaper, tires, used oil, and green waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an established recycling program that has operated for a number of years. In 1996, the City submitted its first annual Diversion Report for 1995. At that time, it was reported that the City had achieved the 25% diversion rate goal, as established through Assembly Bill 939, through its curbside recycling program, which includes the collection of paper, glass, plastics and aluminum/tin. Grant funds are available for installation and material costs of rubberized mat surfacing (manufactured from California waste tire rubber) placed underneath and around playground equipment. Pour-in-place projects using a thin layer of synthetic rubber over a tire rubber base are also acceptable. The City is proposing funds in the 1998/99 fiscal year budget for the installation CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TIRE RECYCLING GRANT December 17, 1997 Page 2 of "resilient surfacing" along with equipment modifications in existing play areas. These modifications will provide access to the play equipment in response to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Money received from this grant would offset some of the purchasing and installation costs to provide surfacing in three park play areas: Bear Gulch, Windrows and Coyote Canyon Parks. Eligible applicants may request up to $25,000 under this competitive grant program. In addition, all applicants are required to provide minimum matching funds equaling 50% of the total project cost, and may include funds provided for the cost of ground preparation, materials, and installation. However, playground equipment and in-kind services are not eligible expenses for fulfillment of the matching fund requirement. If successful in receiving the grant award, the City will be notified by April, 1998. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:KE:ls Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 9 7-/'~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 97/98 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted Assembly Bill 1843 (W. Brown, Chapter 974, Statutes of 1989) that provides grants to local governments, businesses and non-profit organizations for the purpose of diverting tires from landfill disposal by fostering new business enterprises and encouraging cooperative local government programs; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies, businesses and non-profit organizations under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board require the applicant to certify by resolution approval of the application before submission of said application to the state; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for development of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga authorizes the submittal of an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for a 97/98 Tire Recycling Grant. The City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary applications, contracts, agreements, amendments and payment requests hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this 17th day of December, 1997. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $20,750.00 FROM FUND 09 - GAS TAX (A/C 09-4637-7045) FOR THE FINAL LEASE PAYMENT FOR A 10-WHEEL DUMP TRUCK RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $20,750.00 from Fund 09 - "Gas Tax" (A/C 09-4637-7045) for the final payment for a 10-wheel dump truck. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City routinely enters into lease/purchase agreements for the purchase of certain vehicles-- typically large vehicles such as street sweepers and dump trucks. This is due to the extent of the expenditure being difficult to absorb in a single year. Earlier this fiscal year the City was invoiced for the final annual payment (due last fiscal year) on a street sweeper. Because the invoice was received late, funds from the current fiscal year were used to make that payment. As such, the funds earmarked for this year's final lease payment for the 1 O-wheel dump track are no longer available. Because funds that were originally budgeted last fiscal year for the sweeper were not spent, we can re-appropriate these funds in this fiscal year without impacting currently budgeted project. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:WCS:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: 'FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $100,000 FOR FUND 01-4638-6035 FOR DEVELOPMENT FEE SUPPORTED PLAN CHECK CONSULTANT CONTRACT SERVICES FOR FY 1997/98 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $100,000 for Fund 01-4638-6035 for development fee supported plan check consultant contract services for FY 1997/98. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The upmm in the economy has increased the level of Engineering plan check section final maps, streets, storm drain, and other public improvements. More and more deelopers are requesting expedited plan check services. Contract services are then considered as an option for the developer. Contract services for plan check consultants are not utilized unless additional fees are paid by a developer and only when a developer requests expedited plan check services. Respectfully subm(tted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA __ STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II APPROVAL OF A CITY POLICY FOR PLACEMENT OF BANNERS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a policy limiting banners and other promotional signs within the public fight-of-way to City and City-sponsored events only. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On rare occasions in the past, the City has allowed non-City organizations to display banners within the right-of-way to promote their not-for-profit events. An example is the recent YWCA Anti- Violence campaign in which the YWCA placed banners promoting their cause on some of the traffic signals and safety lighting at some intersections on Haven Avenue. Although such causes are certainly worthy of attention, the proposed policy will limit these displays to City or City-sponsored events only. The purpose in doing this is to protect the City from having to issue permits, approve locations and messages, and potentially choose among a number of different organizations wanting to promote their causes or events within the City fights-of-way. In addition, limiting these banners to City events precludes staff from being responsible for regulating the amount of time the banners of another organization are installed within our fight-of-way. This policy was reviewed and approved by the Public Works Subcommittee. Respectfully submitted., William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MD Attachment: Proposed Policy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANNERS IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY POLICY POLICY NO.: PAGE 1 OF 1 EFFECTIVE: 12/18/97 REVISED: APPROVED: PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to set uniform standards for the placement of banners within the public right-of-way in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. POLICY: The only banners or other promotional materials that will be allowed within the public right- of-way will be those belonging to the City of Rancho Cucamonga or those related to City- sponsored events. The size, desired locations, and message displayed on the proposed banners must be reviewed by the Public Works Subcommittee and approved by the City Council prior to placement within the City right-of-way. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP FOR TRACT 14534, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 14534 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14534, located at the southeast comer of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 9, 1996, for the division of 9.501 acres into 54 lots. The Developer, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a Califomia Corporation, had submitted an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements and were approved by the City Council on October 1, 1997. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7-/9~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14534 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14534, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation, and consisting of 54 lots located at the southeast comer of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on October 9, 1996, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14534 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by William Lyon Homes, Inc. as developer and approved previously by City Council on October 1, 1997; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14534 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. At'H, ~ ,4~VE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~1~G DI~k~ION T~ACT 1~SBd N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR C.U.P. 93-13, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE SOUTH OF 8TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY E & R RANCHO PACIFIC, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for C.U.P. 93-13. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS C.U.P. 93-13, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue south of 8th Street, is required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions the Developer is required to have the project annexed into the appropriate lighting and landscape maintenance districts. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form has been received from the Developer and is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw Attachments _,2 City of Rancho Cucamonga ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 209-211-10 /~: 8TH ] -- J MINI~'T'ORAGE N VICINITY MAP CUP 93-13 RESOLUTION NO. 9 7-/9 Z/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR C.U.P. 93-13 (APN: 209-211-10) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM " LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 -v 8TH CUP 93-13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~x ~,'~,'~ ~' //5 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: C.U.P. 93-13 (APN: 209-211-10) STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L 9500L 16.000L S1 --- 1' --- S6 ......... * Installed with original development. LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. L3B ...... NUMBER OF LAMPS 22.000L 27.500L Non-Turf S.F. Trees Ea. * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B N/A 1.78 3.56 1.78 1.78 Annexation Date: December 17, 1997 Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-32, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 320 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT 9777 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY FOOTHILL AUTO BODY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. ! and 6. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit 95-32 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the 8th day of May 1996, for the construction of a non-conforming auto body shop located in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Archibald Avenue at 9777 Foothill Boulevard. The Developer, Mr. Rex Shaffer of Foothill Auto Body, a California General Partnership, is submitting a Consent and Waiver to Annexation as required by the project conditions of approval. Copy of said Consent and Waiver to Annexation are available in the City Clerk's office. Res~~p~/~lly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD:sd Attachments VICINITY MAP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT: CUP 95-32 File: h:\exhibit\cup95-32 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-32, APN: 208-282-03 AND 04 WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I 3B AND 6 > .< .< .< FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ~,~ ,~'~'~',' , ~ I ~.1 , . .- ~. ~ ....~- . - ~ : -,-.~ ~; ~ ~. , J.~,,.,..'W=---q~.._-~' ~ ., . I_- .... ~ t~ ~- _.~ -- ., ......I- m. '. , .~: ., -~,.~.~._ -" -~:~1~/~· -~,---I-t x '~'~ ~- .' · ~ ' -: .... 1~ ~-~'J ~/~,,.~ ~"': . ~~.,~ ~. ; .... INIERIM SITE PLAN .__J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT: CUP 95-32 File: h:\exhibR\cup95-32 STREET LIGHTS: EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: C.U.P. 95-32 APN: 208-282-03, -04 Dist. S1 S6 5800L NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16,000L 22.000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Dist. L3B Community Equestrian Trail D.G.S.F. Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B N/A 1.23 2.46 1.23 1.23 Annexation Date: 12/17/97 S/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA __ STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13565-5 THROUGH TRACT 13565-10, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION AND RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES, AND RELEASE OF PORTIONS OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND TRANSFER OF MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 19, 1995, FROM STANDARD PACIFIC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (1) accepting the new Improvement Agreements, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, (2) releasing a portion of the previous Securities and authorizing the Finance Department to transfer to the new agreements the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit and (3) authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said documents. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 13565-5 thru Tract 13565-10, located north of Wilson Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road, was approved by City Council on April 19, 1995. The Tract Maps were recorded on January 11, 1989. Tract 13565-10 has been purchased by Richmond American Homes, who has submitted an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Labor and Monumentation Performance Material Bond Cash Deposit Tract 13565-10 Northerly Swale San Sevaine From Crescenta Way Northerly - LMD San Sevaine from Crescenta Way Northerly- Street $234,277.45 $117,138.73 179,850.00 89,925.00 211,538.25 105,769.13 99,882.20 49,941.10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10 December 17, 1997 Page 2 Standard Pacific will continue to develop Tracts 13565-5 thru 9. Portions of the improvements are already completed therefore, Standard Pacific is substituting the following bonds, Bonds to Be Released: Faithful Labor and Performance Material Bond Monumentation 13565-5 $187,000.00 $ 94,000.00 13565-8 292,000.00 146,000.00 13565-9 174,000.00 87,000.00 13565-10 93,000.00 47,000.00 San Sevaine Road 757,000.00 379,000.00 Crestline Place 593,000.00 297,000.00 $4,300.00 transfer 4,550.00 transfer 4,450.00 transfer 3,900.00 transfer Bonds with New Standard Pacific Agreement: Faithful Labor and Performance Material Bond Monumentmion 13565-5 13565-8 13565-9 San Sevaine from Summit to Crescenta - LMD San Sevaine from Summit to Crescenta- Street $104,227.75 $ 52,113.87 128,637.85 64,318.92 311,140.50 155,570.25 211,538.25 105,769.13 108,050.25 54,025.12 $4,300.00 4,550.00 4,450.00 The above mentioned securities shall provide for adequate development of this area by Standard Pacific and Richmond American. Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The original Improvement Agreement with Standard Pacific approved on April 19, 1995, will remain in place with the following bonds: Faithful Labor and Monumentation Performance Material Bond Cash Deposit 13565-6 13565-7 MWDLandscape Easement $427,000.00 $214,000.00 $4,350.00 149,000.00 75,000.00 4,600.00 488,000.00 244,000.00 --- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10 December 17, 1997 Page 3 The Developer has indicated the improvements for these bonds are substantially complete. He will coordinate with the Engineering Construction Management division for release of these bonds in the near future. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DJ:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 9 7- / ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU TRACT 13565-10 AND RELEASING A PORTION OF THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND TRANSFER OF MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 19, 1995. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, did consider Improvement Agreements, related Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation and Richmond American Homes, as developers, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located north of Wilson Avenue and East of Wardman Bullock Road and release or transfer portions of previously approved Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from Standard Pacific Corporation. WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that (1) said Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation and Richmond American Homes are hereby approved, (2) portions of the previously approved Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from Standard Pacific, are released or transferred as indicated below and (3) the mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. Standard Pacific Improvement Securities to be released and Monumentation Cash Deposit to be transferred: Faithful Labor and Performance Material Bond Monumentation 13565-5 $187,000.00 13565-8 292,000.00 13565-9 174,000.00 13565-10 93,000.00 San Sevaine Road 757,000.00 Crestline Place 593,000.00 $ 94.000.00 146.000.00 87.000.00 47.000.00 379.000.00 297.000.00 $4,300.00 transfer 4,550.00 transfer 4,450.00 transfer 3,900.00 transfer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1997 TO: FROM: BY: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence 1. Temple, Administrative Services Director~/~ Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution which will establish facility fees at the Family Sports Center; establish, adjust or rename certain fees within the Engineering, Fire District, Planning, and Public Safety Sections. This resolution also will incorporate fees already adopted by the Library Board for the new Technical Center. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Fire District has revised its previous format and breaks down existing fees into more clearly defined categories. Additionally, it has increased existing fees based on actual departmental increases and established a new fee category for use of"Newby", the substance sniffing dog. Community Services has added a new category of fees for the Family Sports Center, increased fees associated with hourly rates for facility rentals and per day charges for equipment; and reduced rates on sky box and other facility rentals for non-ticketed events. The definition of Group 3 has been revised to include religious organizations with paid managelnent. Planning has established four new fees; Pre-Application Review, Land Use Verification Report; Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control License); and Trail Easement Vacation. There has been no change to other existing fees. There have been no fee changes within the Engineering Section; however, the title Subordination Agreement has been revised to Standard Agreement/Document Processing m~d a section entitled "Other Fees", has been added to provide for the collection of San Bernardino County fees as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: docmnentary handling fee for filing notice of determination; development review fee; county recording fee; and county printing fee. The Police Department has added a per page fee for citation copies. Attached are matrices which explain fee changes. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temp~ Administrative Services Director Attach. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FEES MATRIX DEPARTMENT FEE CURRENT DESCRIPTION FEE PROPOSED PERCENT EXPLANATION FEE CHANGE Neighborhood & Community Park Lighted Sports Venue Fees Classes Workshops/Programs Beginning 9/94 100% of costs of electrical usage and demand charges as outlined by S.C. Edison Cost Recover Basis No Change 0 Fee range depending upon group category (see Attachment A - listing of definition of group categories) No Change 0 Non Resident Charge $5.00 No Change 0 Facility Rentals Fees structured on a cost-coveting basis and set based upon market rate of similar programs in survey cities. New fees for R.C. Family Sports Center structured on a cost coveting basis and based upon survey of similar programs in survey cities & private industry (see Attachment B). i Fee paid by each non- resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City sponsored classes. Does not apply to one day activities or trips sponsored by the City. Building Rentals Hourly Fee $0-70/hr No Change 0 Fees based upon group category, room size and time of day Kitchen Hourly Fee Other Fees Per Day Charges Community Amphitheater Usage Equestrian Center Fee and Charges Room Rental/Hr Daily Snack Bar/Kitchen Lights $0-15/hr Additional staff charges - $10/hr; Damage/Security Deposit - $200 $5 -40 No Change 0 Fees based upon group category No Change 0 Fees based upon size and type of activity No Change 0 Fees are flat per day charges based upon item (see Attachment C) Rental (fiat fee) $0-95 Sound Monitor- $0-43/hr No Change 0 Based upon group category Annual Shared Storage Fee $0-54/hr $0-7 No Change 0 Based upon group category and time of day No Change 0 Based upon group category 100% of actual No Change 0 energy consumption $0-75 No Change 0 Based upon actual energy consumption Based upon group category Storage No storage No Change 0 Due to limited space provided to available ongoing groups without storage for outside approval of CSD groups is not permitted Epicenter Sports Park Tournament Fees Rental Fees Per Field Deposit Infield Lighting Light Fee Staffing, Equipment and Material Community & Neighborhood Park Leagues & Tournaments Deposit Staffing Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues & Tournaments $120-245 $75 Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost $50 $15/hr $0-140 No 'Change No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Based upon group category. Includes initial field dragging and watering Flat fee applied to total rental fee Based upon actual cost Based upon actual cost When additional City staffing, equipment and material is required for tournaments and/or special events scheduled at the Epicenter Sports Park fields, applicant is required to pay all event-related expenses. Non-refundable deposit required to reserve fields. Deposit applies to final field rental total. Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities applicant is charged an hourly fee for those services. Based upon group category and time frame of activity Drag & Line Bases Snack Bars (City Owned in City Parks) Snack Bars (Non-Profit Groups Bringing in Snack Bar, i.e., Trailers) Storage - Seasonal (City Owned in City Parks) Actual Cost No Change 0 $20-40/field No Change 0 $0/450 No Change 0 $300 No Change 0 Drag and line fees include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. Bases are available only when renting fields for tournaments. Fee based on a per field, per day basis, subject to availability. Based upon group category Seasonal Permit Fee; unless group is participating in City sponsored event $0/75 No Change 0 Seasonal charge R.C. Family Sports Center Rental Rates Basketball Courts (per N/A court; athletic use only) Racquetball Courts (Group Rental per Court) N/A $0-120 Plus $15/hr (2 staff) Cleaning/ Damage Deposit $100 $0-70 Plus $15/hr (2staff) Cleaning/ Damage Deposit $100 100% 100% Fees range depending upon group category and number of hours of usage. Fees based upon survey of comparable facilities (See Attachment D) Fees range depending upon group category and number of hours of usage. Fees based upon survey of comparable facilities (See Attachment E) Epicenter Stadium Complex Fees Stadium Facility Stadium Remal Rate Sky Box Rental Rate Cafe Area Rental Rate Pavilion Area Rental Rate: Covered Pavilion 3rd base side Open Pavilion 1 st base side $1,500/day (ticketed event); $2000/day (non- ticketed event) $50/hr (ticketed event); $50Pnr (non- ticketed event) $50/hr (ticketed event); $50/hr (non- ticketed event) N/A N/A No Change 0 No Change -40% (ticketed event); $30/hr (non- ticketed event) No Change -40% (ticketed event); $30/hr (non- ticketed event) $50/hr (ticketed event); $30/hr (non- ticketed event) $25/hr (ticketed event); $15/hr (non- ticketed event) 100% 100% Market Survey Performed Prior to Facility Opening (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Event Expenses Applicant pays all event related expenses including personnel, equipment, materials & other related costs No Change 0 Market Survey (See Attachment F) Parking !,ot Events Stadium On-Site Events: Rental Rates Lots A,B,C Rental Rates Lots D,E,F $500/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non-Ticketed Events - $670/day $250/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non-Ticketed Events - $335/day No Change No Change 0 Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Expanded Parking Lots: Parking Lot #1 Parking Lot #2 Parking Lot #3 Event Quadrant A-F $500/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non-Ticketed Event - $670/day $250/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non-Ticketed Event - $335/day $1,500/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non-Ticketed Event - $2,000/day $250/day plus 10% of gross ticket sales; Non- Ticketed Event - $335/day No Change No Change No Change No Change 0 0 0 0 Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Event Expenses Parking Rates Baseball Events Concerts & Special Events Parking Lot Events Applicant pays event related expenses including personnel, equipment, materials and other related costs. $2 per car; $15 per bus $3-5 per car; $5-10 VIP car; $15 per bus depending on event No Change 0 No Change 0 No Change 0 Cost Recovery (See Attachment F) Option to charge No Change 0 $2-5 per car Concessions 20% of gross No Change Food & Beverage sales Merchandise & Novelties Miscellaneous Commercial Filming Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) 0 10% non- 100 profit organization utilizing Epicenter 25-35% of gross 20% of gross Percent sales to be sales to be decrease negotiated negotiated; varies 10% for non-profit organization Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Fee lowered to better accommodate non-profit organizations Fee lowered to better accommodate and encourage groups to sell merchandise & novelties. $1,000- $1,000- $3,000/day $4,000/day depending on depending filming on filming requirements plus requirements actual costs for plus actual City services costs for City services 25% Market Survey (See Attachment F) Commercial Filming in Parking Lot Commercial Photograph Audio Broadcast Recording Fee Taping -TV Deposit Additional Move-in Take Down/Move-out Days Tent/Canopy Maintenance Reserve Fee $500-$1,500/day depending on filming requirements plus actual costs for City services $500-$1,500/day depending on filming requirements plus actual costs for City services $300/ performance $500/ performance $1,500/ performance Location credit required $500-$2,500/day depending upon event/rental requirements 50% of daily rental rate $300-$1,000 per event depending upon event/rental requirements $500- 25% $2,000./day depending on filming requirements · plus actual costs for City services $500- 25% $2,000/day depending on filming requirements plus actual costs for City services $300/ 0 performance $500/ 0 performance $1,500/ 0 performance Location credit required $500- 0 $2,500/day depending upon event/rental requirements 50% of daily 0 rental rate $300-$1,000 per event depending upon event/rental requirements Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) Market Survey (See Attachment F) ATTACHMENT "A" Definition of Group Categories Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group 2: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which are located and based in the City whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's information night. Group 3: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which has paid management and are located and based in the City. Group 4: City resident private party activity, City resident employee organizations, City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making, non-resident not-for-profit civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, and profit-making organizations. ATTACHMENT "B" Survey of Sports Programs at ILC. Family Sports Center (Note: Covered under category for classes/workshops/programs) SPORT- FEE PEE WEE BASKETBALL PEE WEE HOCKEY YOU'i~ BASKETBALL YOUTH INDOOR SOCCER YOUTH BASKETBALL OPEN PLAY YOUTH CLASSES YOUTH ILAQUETBALL OPEN PLAY YOUTH WALLYBALL ADULT BASKETBALL ADULT VOLLEYBALL ADULT RAQUETBALL LEAGUES ADULT RAQUETBALL CLASSES ADULT WALLYBALL ADULT BASKETBALL OPEN PLAY ADULT RAQUETBALL OPEN PLAY ONTARIO $27.00 /CHILD I~PLAtN]D CHINO MONTCLAIR FONTAN.fl, CHINO RIALT~ RANCHO HILLS CUCAMONGA $32.00 W/O $20.00 N/A $23.00 :$32.00 $25.00 $27.00 PICT./CHILD /CHILD /CHILD /CHILD /CHILD /CHILD S38.00 W/ (6 PICTJCHILD WEEK) N/A N/A N/A N/A $27.00 $32.00 $20.00/CHlL $25.00 /CHILD $38.00 D /CHILD (6 WEEK) N/A N/A N/A N/A FREE N/A N/A FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $438.00 N/A N/A $277.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $3.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $2.00 N/A N/A $5.00 N/A $505.00;fEAM $180.00/TEAM $27.00 /CHILD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $30.00 0 LESSON) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $25.00 /CHILD N/A FREE N/A SS.p~r hour N/A S523.00ff EAM N/A S25.00 $35.00 (~- I HOUR SESSION S) N/A N/A S5.00 Inn' hour $27/CH1LD $39.50/$49.50 /CHILD $45/ CHILD $1/CHILD $25/CHILD $3/CHILD $25/CHILD $440/TEAM $230/TEAM $25/ADULT $40/ADULT $25/ADULT $3/ADULT S5.00 per hour/player Attachment "B" Survey of Sports Programs at ILC. Family Sports Center Current Fees and Proposed Fees Sport Pee Wee Basketball Pee Wee Hockey Youth Basketball Youth Indoor Soccer Youth Basketball Open Youth Racquetball Class Youth Racquetball - Open Youth Wallyb.all Leagues Adult Basketball League Adult Volleyball League Adult Racquetball Leagues Adult Racquetball Class Adult Wallyball Leagues Adult Basketball - Open Adult Racquetball - Open Activity Discount Pass Fees: Monthly Racquetball Pass Resident Adult $ 35 Youth $14 Old Fee New Fee $27 per player $27 per player $27 per player $27 per player $39.50 - "D", $49.00 -"C- Same n/a $45 per player n/a $1.00 per player n/a $25 per player n/a $3 per player n/a $25 per player $415 per team $440 per team $210 per team $230 per team n/a $25 per player n/a $40 per player n/a $25 per player n/a $3 per player n/a $5 per hr. per player Non-resident $ 40 $19 Basketball passes (limited entry) Resident Youth $ 7.50 (10entries) $11.25 (15 entries) Adult $ 27.50 (10 entries) $37.50(15 entries) Non-resident $12.50 (10 entries) $16.25 (15 entries) $ 32.50 (10 entries) $ 42.50 (15 entries) Annual Racquetball/Basketball Passes Resident Non-resident Adult $210 $240 Youth $170 $200 Family $380 $410 ATTACHMENT "C" FACILITY RENTALS -- PER DAY CHARGES ITEM CURRENT PROPOSED PERCENT EXPLANATION FEE FEE CHANGE Coffee Pot (small) $2 $5 60% Phone Survey Coffee Pot (large) $5 $10 50% Phone Survey Small Stage $10 $20 50% Phone Survey Large Stage $50 $50 0 No Change TV with video player $20 $20 0 No Change Microphone $5 $10 50% Phone Survey Small PA System $40 $40 0 No Change Slide/Overhead Projector $10 $10 0 No Change Piano* $25 $25 0 No Change Professional Lighting Tree or $3/light $40 Varies Cost Recovery Spot Staff for Lighting N/A $10/hr 100% Cost Recovery * The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to the rental cost. ATTACHMENT "D" SURVEY OF BASKETBALL COURTS GYMNASIUM RENTAL RATES Alta Loma High School Custodial Fee: Rental Fee: $31.50/Hour $65.00/First Hour $30.00/Additional Hour Total Rental Fee: $96.50 First Hour $61.50 Each Additional Hour Rancho Cucamonga High School Custodial Fee: $31.50/Hour Rental Fee: $35.50/Hour Alta Loma Elementary School District (Vineyard Junior High School) Rental Fee: $40.00/Hour (includes custodial fee) Etiwanda Elementary School District (Etiwanda/Summit Intermediate Schools) Custodial Fee: $24.00/Hour Rental Fee: $27.00/Hour City of Rialto Rental Fee: Staffing Fee: Security/Cleaning Deposit: $10.00-$70.00/Hour based on group catergory $10.00/Hour $0-$500.00 (Refundable) Attachment "E" Survey of Racquetball Programs at ILC. Family Sports Center Fees Group Rental Open* Member- ship** Group Rental Per Court Marriot- C!aremon. Whittier City of City of Ontario Athletic Family San Carson Club Fitness Dimas Center n/a negotiable rda n/a n/a $5 hr. per player $35 per month n/a $5 hr. per $5 hr. per player player; $$ hr. per player after 5:00p.m. $99 per yr. $14 per $210 per month year n/a negotiable n/a n/a $5 per hr. per player $150 per year per resident; $180 per year per non-res. rl~a City of Montclair n/a $5 hr. per player; $7 per hr. per player after 4:30p.m. n/a r~a Footnotes: * City Program Fee - Youth Racquetball (open) - $3 per player Adult Racquetball (open) - $5 per player **Activity Discount Pass - See Attachment "B" F~ Rental Me~nber. ship ATTACHMENT "B" Survey of Surrounding Cities RE: Sport Facility Marriot- C!aremon. Whittier City of Ontario Athletic Family San Club Fitness Dimas Center $5. hr. per n/a $5. hr. per player player $5. hr. per player; $8. hr. per player after 5.'00p.m. $35. per $99/month $14. per month plus a month one time initiation fee of $50( for an individual $210. per year Rentals/Memberships City of City of Carson Montelair $5. per hr. per player $150. per year per resident; $180. per year per non-res. $5. hr. per player; $7. hr. per player after 4:30p.m. n/a ATTACHMENT "B" SURVEY OF GYMNASIUM RENTAL RATES Alta Loma High School Custodial Fee: Rental Fee: $31.50/Hour $65.00/First Hour $30.00/Additional Hour Total Rental Fee: $96.50 First Hour $61.50 Each Additional Hour Rancho Cucamonga High School Custodial Fee: Fee waived in exchange for use of Epicenter for graduation Rental Fee: $35.50/Hour Alta Loma Elementary School District Remal Fee: $40.00/Hour Etiwanda Elementary School District Rental Fee: $27.00/Hour City of Rialto Rental Fee: Staffing Fee: Security/Cleaning Deposit: $10.00-$70.00/Hour based on group catergory $10.00/Hour $0-$500.00 (Refundable) I: Z z 0 iiiz I.I-Z Z 0 _zo ., zo z I RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7--/ 7~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 96-012 A. Recitals. (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oral or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (iii) (iv) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City, and Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on October 16, 1997; and (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are established: Section 1.0 Building and Safety Fees: 1.0 A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work Fees $1.00 to $1,000.00 $25.00 $1,001.00 to $2,000.00 $25.00 for the first $1,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00. 7¢ $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $217.50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $5.50 for each additional $1,000.00 of fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $ 50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $355.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00. $100,000.00 and over 1.1 Plan Review Fees: $555.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. (a) When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of submittal of plans. (b) (c) Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein. Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein. (d) Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the following schedule: Quantity of Cut and Fill Fee 50 100 yards $ 50.00 101 500 yards 100.00 501 - 1,000 yards 200.00 1,001 - 2,000 yards 250.00 2,001 - 3,000 yards 300.00 3,001 - 4,000 yards 350.00 4,001 - 5,000 yards 400.00 5,001 - 10,000 yards 500.00 10,001 - 50,000 yards 600.00 50,001 -100,000 yards 700.00 100,001 - And up 900.00 The sum of cut and fill yardages shall be used in computing grading permit and plan checking fees. (e) Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.00 per hour for the estimated time of checking revisions. 1.2 Compliance Inspections/Reinspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice ..................................................................................................................... $30.00 1.3 Change of Occupancy: Change of Occupancy Inspection ..........................................................................$50.00 1.4 Relocated Buildings: Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or within the City, shall be $100.00 when located within 25 miles of City offices, plus $2.00 per mile, round trip, when located more than 25 miles from City offices. 1.5 Appeal of Abatement Notice: An appeal of a notice to abate a substandard or dangerous building ............................................................................................................................. $100.00 1.6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary Occupancy: Inspection .............................................................................................................$ 30.00 1.7 Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge four hours) ...................................................................................................... $50.00 per hour 1.8 Inspections for which no permit fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge one-half hour) ......................................................................................................... $50.00 per hour 1.9 Electrical Permit Fees: (a) Permit Issuance: For issuing each permit ................................................................................$15.00 For issuing each supplemental permit ...........................................................$ 4.50 (b) System Fee Schedule: (NOTE: The following are in addition to permit-issuing fee.) New Residential Buildings: The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot .............................................................................................................. $ .035 For new garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential building per square foot ............................. $ .02 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Private Swimming Pools, Spas: For new private residential, permanently installed spas, hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each ............................................................................... $ 30.00 For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Carnivals and Circuses: Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable- type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, each ............................................................................................................$15.00 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, each .................................................................................... $ 4.50 For a system of area and booth lighting, each ..............................................$ 4.50 For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Services: For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each ........................................................................................................... $ 18.50 For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating, each ........................................................................................................... $ 37.50 For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating, each ...........................................................................................................$ 75.00 Temporary Power Service: (c) For a temporaw service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal- mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each ................................ $ 15.00 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each ............................................................................................................. $ 7.50 Unit Fee Schedule: NOTE: The following are in addition to permit issuing fee. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets: For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each .....................$ .75 Additional outlets, each ..................................................................................$ .45 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures: For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices. First 20, each ..............................................................................................................$ .75 Additional fixtures, each ................................................................................$ .45 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each .....................................$ .75 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each ...............................................................................................................$ .75 Residential Appliances: For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall- mounted electric ovens; counter-mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor-operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KVV), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each .......................................... $ 3.00 NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Non-residential Appliances: For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory-wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KVV), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases, drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each ..................... $ 3.00 NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus: For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KVV), kilovolt-amperes (KVA), or kilovolt- amperes-reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each ...........................................................................$ 3.00 Over 1 and not over 10, each .......................................................................$ 7.50 Over 10 and not over 50, each ...................................................................$15.00 Over 50 and not over 100, each .................................................................$ 30.00 Over 100, each ...........................................................................................$ 45.00 NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly-related control equipment. Busways: For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof ......................................................................................................... $ 4.50 NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees: For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each ........................................................................................................... $ 15.00 For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each ............................................................................................ $ 3.00 £¢ 1.10 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors: For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth .............................................................. $ 11.00 NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. Plumbing Permits: (a) Permit Issuance: For the issuance of each permit ....................................................................$ 15.00 For issuing each supplemental permit .........................................................$ 4.50 (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above): For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and backflow protection therefor) .................................... $ 6.00 For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer ...............................$15.00 Rainwater systems --per drain (inside building) ...........................................$ 6.00 For each cesspool (where permitted) .........................................................$ 22.50 For each private sewage disposal system .................................................$ 45.00 For each water heater and/or vent ..............................................................$ 7.50 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps ......... $12.00 For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each ........................................................................................... $ 3.00 For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture ........................................................................................................... $ 3.00 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices therefor ........................................................................................... $ 9.00 For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler system: I to 5 ............................................................................................................$ 7.50 over 5, each .................................................................................................$ 1.50 For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller ....................................................................................$ 7.50 over 2 inches ...............................................................................................$15.00 For each gas piping system of one to four outlets .......................................$ 3.00 For each gas piping system of five or more, per outlet ................................$ 0.75 Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not including gas piping) ......................................................................................................... $10.00 1.11 Mechanical Permits: A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: (a) Permit Issuance: For the issuance of each permit ................................................................$ 15.00 For issuing each supplemental permit ........................................................$ 4.50 (b) Unit Fee Schedule (In addition to issuance fees above): For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h ............................................................................................... $ 9.00 For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ........................................................................................................... $11.00 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent .............................................................................................................. $ 9.00 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater ........................................................................ $ 9.00 For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit ............................................................. $ 4.50 For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code ............................................................................................................. $ 9.00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h .... $ 9.00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1.12 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h ................................................$16.50 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h ................................................................. $ 22.50 For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h .................................................................. $ 33.50 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h .................. $ 56.00 For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto ................................................................................. $ 6.50 Note: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is an integral portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm ................................................$11.00 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type ..................................$ 6.50 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct ......................................$ 4.50 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit ...................................................................... $ 6.50 For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood ................................................................................. $6.50 For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator ................................................................................................... $11.00 For the installation or relocation of each commercial industrial-type incinerator ................................................................................................... $ 45.00 For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code..$ 6.50 Grading Permit Fees: A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Quantity of Cut and Fill 50 cubic yards or less Fee $15.00 9 51 to 100 cubic yards $22.50 101 to 1,000 cubic yards -- $22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards -- $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards -- $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more -- $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1.13 Application for Plan Duplication Application for duplication processing ............................$ 30.00 Section 2.0 Business License Fees Fees for business licenses are found within Title 5 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16, thereof. Section 3.0 City Clerk Fees Municipal Code Supplements to the municipal code will vary in cost and will be billed accordingly. $150.00 Variable Section 4.0 Copying Rates, Media and Subscription Fees: Fee Activity Photocopies Microfilming Microfiche jackets Audio Tape Computer Diskettes Subscriptions: l0 Fee $.25/page* $.25/page* $1.00/plan page $1.00/sheet $10.00/tape $ 5.00 diskette Council Agenda Minutes Planning Commission Agenda Minutes Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda $118.00/yr. $145 O0/yr. $ 43.50/yr. $160.00/yr. $ 9.00/yr. Engineering Plans and Specifications per set cost Mailing Costs (Overnight) for above $Variable $Variable Research Requests- All Departments Time spent beyond 1/2 hour will be billed in increments of 1/4 hr. at: First 1/2 Hour No Charge $ 25.00/Hr. *There will be a minimum charge of $1.00 for 1-3 pages FAX Requests - All Departments A maximum of 6 pages may be requested. If material requested is more than 6 pages, material will be mailed and billed at rate established by this Resolution. No Charge Section 5.0 5.1 Engineering Fees Applications Tentative Parcel Map Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map Appeal Time Extension - Tentative Parcel Map Certificate of Compliance Lot Line Adjustment Amending Parcel Map and Modification of map conditions Reapportionment Map (A two-sheet parcel/tract map; Street Vacation Standard Agreement/Doc. Processing Release of Lien Agreement Fee $2,514.00 $ 225.00 $ 251.00 $ 549.00 $1,190.00 $1,190.00 $1,190.00 $ 600.00 $30.00 for $1,156.00 $ 298.00 $ 298.00 each additional sheet) 5.2 5.3 Certificate of Correction Flood Hazard Letter Bond Substitution Private Street Designation Reimbursement Agreement Storm Drain Street and Utilities Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.) Map and Plan Checking Fees Property Legal Description Map Checking Residential Parcel Maps $ 256.00 $ 314.00 $ 42O.OO $ 495.00 $2,227.00 $2,827.00 $ 751.00 $ 584.00 $1,370 + $180 per Parcel Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps of 10 lots or less Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps over 10 lots Improvement Plans Widening of existing streets Interior Streets 1-2 sheets: 3-5 sheets: 6-10 sheets: 11 or more: Storm Drain Plans - Hydrology Study: Drainage areas up to 150 acres Drainage areas over 150 acres Landscape and irrigation plans for City-maintained areas $2,070.00 $1,720 + $35 per parcel or lot $1.35 per LF + sheet charge for interior streets $1,370 per sheet $2,740 + $1,200 per sheet over 2 sheets $6,340 + $1,095 per sheet over 5 sheets $11,815 + $1,025 per sheet over 10 sheets Same as for interior streets $1,370.00 $2,740.00 $ 400.00 per sheet For maps and plans checking, the fees for rush checking, when approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved ]2 plans will be on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.00. 5.4 Public Works Construction Permit Fee: 5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000; Min. $50 4.5% of Improvement Cost next $75,000 4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000 The improvement cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bond and as approved by the City Engineer. NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under separate resolutions. 5.5 Oversize Loads *Single Permit $15.00 *Repetitive Permit $70 initial fee + $15 per month renewal fee to a maximum of 6 months *Annual Permit $70 peryear *These ~es am based on the provisions ofthe Calibrnia Vehicle Code Section 35795 and Caltrans Fee Schedule. 5.6 Other Fees Collection of San Bernardino County fees, as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: Documentary Handling Fee for Filing Notice of Determination Development Review Fees County Recording Fee County Printing Fee Section 6.0 Fire Protection District Fees (These fees have been adopted by the Fire Board) 6.1 Plans Checking Fees (Includes plan review and two inspections. Does not include fee for any required Fire District Permits.) Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units ..........................................................................................$100.00 Plan Review Fees 1. Single family residence .....................................................................$132.00 2. Single family residential tract, per phase ...........................................$132.00 3. Multi-family residential, per building ....................................................$677.00 6.2 4. Commercial and industrial development, per building ........................$677.00 5. Water plan/underground waster supply approval ...............................$132.00 6. Conditional use perr,~it .........................................................................$132.00 7. Minor development review ...................................................................$132.00 8. Parcel map review ...............................................................................$132.00 9. Tenant improvement: Per hour, one hour minimum .............................$ 87.00 10. Special Events review ..........................................................................$ 87.00 11. Accessory plans review: aisles, access, seating, etc ...........................$ 66.00 12. Alternate Method approval ...................................................................$ 92.00 13. Revision to existing plan (e.g., as-builts, excluding TI plans) ...............$ 92.00 14. New fire sprinkler systems, standpipes or over ten heads ..................$164.00 a. Single family residential sprinkler systems .....................................No Fee 15. Fire sprinkler alteration, ten heads or less ............................................$ 92.00 16. Pre-engineered fire protection systems ..............................................$147.00 17. Fire detection and alarm systems .........................................................$154.00 18. Flammable finishes spray booth (per booth) ........................................$164.00 19. LPG tank installation review (per tank) ................................................$147.00 20. Underground storage tank removal review (per tank) ..........................$147.00 21. Flammable & combustible liquid, tank & piping ....................................$164.00 22. Division consulting fees not otherwise stated (one hour minimum) ......$137.00 23. Failure to keep appoint (one hour minimum) ........................................$ 66.00 24. Microfilm charges - (per page) ..............................................................$ 1.00 25. Minor plan review not requiring a District inspection .............................No Fee C. Inspection Fees (per hour - one hour minimum) 1. Field Inspection required after the initial and follow-up inspection .......$110.00 2. Failure to keep an inspection appointment ............................................$ 66.00 3. Field inspection of self inspection occupancies, failure to comply .........$ 66.00 4. Fire flow test, witness test .....................................................................$ 87.00 5. Unscheduled field inspection or investigation .........................................$ 66.00 6. Same day, short notice inspection .........................................................$ 87.00 Permit Fees (Initial permit and subsequent renewal of permit unless otherwise indicated [e.g. one time only permit activity]) A. Permits 1. General Use Permit ...................................................................................$ 84.00 2. Aerosol products - more than 500 lbs. of level 2 or 3 ................................$131.00 3. Aircraft refueling vehicles ...........................................................................$ 95.00 4. Aircraft repair hangar .................................................................................$ 84.00 5. Automobile wrecking yard ..........................................................................$ 84.00 6. Asbestos removal ......................................................................................$132.00 7. Bowling pin or alley refinishing - involving flammable finishes ...................$ 84.00 8. Candles and open flames in assembly areas ...................................Not permitted 9. Carnivals and fair (see also 6.2E) .............................................................$132.00 10. Cellulose nitrate film ..................................................................................$ 84.00 11. Cellulose nitrate storage - more than 25 lbs ............................................$ 84.00 12. Combustible fiber storage - more than 100 cubic feet .............................$ 84.00 14 13. Combustible material storage - more than 2,500 cubic feet ....................$115.00 14. Compressed gases: a. Corrosive, 200 cubic feet or more .....................................................$ 95.00 b. Flammable, 200 cubic feet or more ..................................................$ 84.00 c. Highly toxic, any amount ..................................................................$ 95.00 d. Inert/simple asphyxiant, 6,000 cubic feet or more ...........................$ 84.00 e. Irritant, 200 cubic feet or more ...........................................................$ 84.00 f. Other health hazards, 650 cubic feet or more ..................................$ 84.00 g. Oxidizing (includes oxygen), 504 cubic feet or more .......................$ 84.00 h. Pyrophoric, any amount ..................................................................$ 95.00 i. Radioactive, any amount ................................................................$115.00 j. Sensitizer, 200 cubic feet or more ....................................................$ 95.00 k. Toxic, any amount ............................................................................$ 95.00 I. Unstable (reactive), any amount .....................................................$132.00 15. Commercial rubbish-handling operations ............................................$ 84.00 16. Cryogens: a Corrosive-inside, over 1 gallon .......................................................$ 95.00 b. Corrosive- outside, over 1 gallon .....................................................$ 95.00 c. Flammable-inside, over 1 gallon ......................................................$ 84.00 d. Flammable-outside, 60 gallons or more ..........................................$ 84.00 e. Highly toxic-inside, over 1 gallon .....................................................$95.00 f. Highly toxic,outside, over 1 gallon ....................................................$ 95.00 g. Nonflammable-inside, 60 gallons or more .......................................$ 95.00 h. Nonflammable-outside, 500 gallons or more ..................................$ 84.00 i. Oxidizer-inside, 50 gallons or more .................................................$ 84.00 j. Oxidizer-outside, 50 gallons or more ...............................................$ 84.00 17. Dry cleaning plants ...............................................................................$132.00 18. Dust-producing operations ..................................................................$ 84.00 19. Explosives or blasting agents: a. Storage, manufacture, process or sell .................................................$ 84.00 b. Use ....................................................................................................$150.00 20. Fire hydrants and water-control valves - use for other purposes ............$ 84.00 21. Fireworks: a. Retail sales ..................................................................................Not permitted b. Aerial displays (see also 6.2E) ...........................................................$ 84.00 22. Flammable or combustible liquids: a. Pipeline, To use, operate, repair or modify a pipeline .....................$132.00 b. Class I liquids, more than 5 gallons inside a building .....................$ 84.00 c. Class I tiquids, more than 10 gallons outside of a building .............$ 84.00 Exceptions to b & c: 1. Storage or use of Class I liquids in vehicle, vessel, aircraft or equipment fuel tanks. 2. Storage or use of paints, oils, varnishes, or similar mixtures for maintenance, painting or similar purposes for less than 30 days. d. Class II or II-A liquids, more than 25 gallons inside a building .......... $ 84.00 e. Class II or III-A liquids, more than 60 gallons outside of a building.$ 84.00 f. To remove Class I or II liquids from an UST by other than normal operation ........................................................................................... $ 95.00 g. Installation, construction, alteration or operation where flammable or combustible liquids are produced, procesed, transported, stored, dispensed or used in any of the following: 23. 24. 25. Tank vehicles ...........................................................................$ 95.00 Equipment ................................................................................$105.00 Tanks, per tank .....................................................................$121.00 Plants ...................................................................................$132.00 Terminals ..............................................................................$132.00 Wells, per well ........................................................................$ 84.00 Fuel-dispensing stations (single and/or multiple pump stations) ........................................................................$ 95.00 Refineries ...............................................................................$132.00 Distilleries ...............................................................................$132.00 h. Installation, alteration, removal, abandon, place temporarily out of service or otherwise dispose of a tank which contained flammable or combustible liquid .............................................................$121.00 i. To change the type of contents in a flammable or combustible liquid ......................................................................................................$132.00 Fruit ripening ...............................................................................................$105.00 Fumigation or themal insecticidal fogging ....................................................$121.00 Hazardous materials: (see also other permit sections) For multiple permits within this Section 25, the fee will be the total of all related permits to a maximum of $400.00 or actual costs, whichever is greater. Carcinogens, 10 lbs. or more .................................................................$132.00 Corrosive liquids, 55 gallons or more ....................................................$ 84.00 Corrosive solids, 500 lbs. or more ..........................................................$ 95.00 Flammable solids, 100 lbs. or more .......................................................$ 95.00 Highly toxic liquids and solids. Any amount ..........................................$ 95.00 Irritant liquids, 55 gallons or more ...........................................................$ 84.00 Irritant solids, 500 lbs. or more ........................................................' .......$84.00 Oxidizing liquids: Class 4, Any amount ..........................................................................$ 84.00 Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ......................................................................$ 84.00 Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ....................................................................$ 84.00 Class 1,500 lbs. or more .....................................................................$ 84.00 i. Oxidizing solids: Class 4, Any amount ............................................................................$ 84.00 Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ......................................................................$ 84.00 Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ....................................................................$ 84.00 Class 1,500 lbs. or more ....................................................................$ 84.00 j. Organic peroxide liquids and solids: Class I, Any amount ............................................................................$ 95.00 Class II, Any amount ..........................................................................$ 95.00 Class III, 10 lbs. or more ...................................................................$ 95.00 Class IV, 20 lbs. or more ...................................................................$ 95.00 k. Other health hazards: Liquids, 55 gallons or more ................................................................$ Solids, 500 lbs. or more .....................................................................$ I. Pyrophoric liquids, Any amount .............................................................$ m Pyrophoric solids, Any amount ...............................................................$ n. Sensitizer liquids, 55 gallons or more .....................................................$ o. Sensitizer solids, 500 lbs. or more .........................................................$ p. Toxic liquids, 10 gallons or more ...........................................................$ 84.00 84.00 95.00 95.00 95.00 9500 95.00 ]6 II. q Toxic solids, 100 lbs. or more .................................................................$ 95.00 r. Unstable (reactive) liquids: Class 4, any amount ...........................................................................$132.00 Class 3, any amount ..........................................................................$132.00 Class 2, 5 gallons or more ................................................................$132.00 Class 1, 10 gallons or more ..............................................................$132.00 s. Unstable (reactive) solids: Class 4, any amount .........................................................................$132.00 Class 3, any amount .........................................................................$132.00 Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ....................................................................$132.00 Class 1, 100 lbs. or more ..................................................................$132.00 t. Water-reactive liquids: Class 3, any amount .........................................................................$ 95.00 Class 2, 5 gallons or more ................................................................$ 95.00 Class 1, 10 gallons or more ..............................................................$ 95.00 u. Water-reactive solids: Class 3, any amount ..........................................................................$ 95.00 Class 2, 50 lbs. or more .....................................................................$ 95.00 Class 1,100 lbs. or more ...................................................................$ 95.00 26. Hazardous production materials - for H-6 occupancies ..............................$132.00 27. High piled combustible storage ..................................................................$105.00 28. Liquefied petroleum bases - store, use, handle or dispense .....................$ 84.00 29. Liquid or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings .............$105.00 30. Lumber yards .............................................................................................$ 84.00 31. Magnesium workings ..................................................................................$121.00 32. Mall, covered (see also 6.211D4) ................................................................$ 84.00 33. Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing stations .......................................................$105.00 34. Open burning .............................................................................................$ 84.00 35. Organic coatings ........................................................................................$132.00 36. Ovens, industrial baking or drying ..............................................................$ 84.00 37. Parade floats ...............................................................................................$ 48.00 38. Places of assembly: a. A-4 Stadiums, reviewing stands and amusement park ........................$ 84.00 b. A-3 occupant load of 50 to 299 without a stage ...................................$ 95.00 c. A-2.1, occupant load of 300 or more without a stage .............................$147.00 d. A-2 occupant load of less than 1000 with a stage ................................$178.00 e. A-1 occupant load of 1000 or more with a stage .................................$225.00 39. Pyrotechnical special effects material (see also 6.2E) ...............................$ 84.00 40. Radioactive materials ..................................................................................$132.00 41. Refrigeration equipment .............................................................................$115.00 42. Repair garages ...........................................................................................$ 84.00 43. Spraying or dipping .....................................................................................$ 84.00 44. Tents, canopies and temporary membrane structures: a. 201 to 400 square feet ..........................................................................$ 84.00 b. 401 to 1500 square feet .......................................................................$110.00 c. 1501 to 15,000 square feet ...................................................................$147.00 d. 15,001 to 30,000 square feet ..............................................................$178.00 e. Over 30,000 square feet ......................................................................$210.00 45. Tire storage ................................................................................................$132.00 46. Welding and cutting operations ..................................................................$ 84.00 Special Services ]7 B. Excessive or malicious false alarms causing response of fire apparatus 1. Response due to "failure to notify" the fire department when working on or testing sprinkler or fire alarm system. $153.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding 1/2 hour minimum. 2. Malicious false alarms. $153 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding with 1/2 hour minimum. 3. Response due to alarm malfunction. $155.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding to all false alarms in excess of 2 false alarms in 30 days with 112 hour minimum. 4. Response to false alarms due to negligence, tampering with the system, construction or modification of the building. $153.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding with 112 hour minimum. 5. Response to false alarm by Battalion Chief and/or Fire Inspector. $50.00 per hour with 112 hour minimum. Response to firesetter incidents (juvenile or adult) and "DUI" callouts: 1. Cost recovery for emergency apparatus responding. $2.50 per minute per piece of equipment. 2.Cost recovery for personnel responding. $0.83 per minute per person. 3. Cost recovery for Battalion Chief or Fire Investigator responding. $0.50 per minute. Response to mitigate extended hazardous chemical and material incidents beyond normal service requires (this includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and aircraft crashes). Hazardous incident, overhead and command, per hour. $273.00 per hour per piece of apparatus Apparatus and crews assigned to the incident, per hour. $170.00 per hour per piece of equipment Specialized resources - HAZMAT crews and equipment. Actual costs Materials and supplies used for the incident. Actual costs Special Activities - Apparatus and crews assigned to activities that require the services, at permittees expense, of one or more standby firefighters. $153.00 per hour per piece of apparatus $ 30.00 per hour, two hour minimum per District employee Accelerant Detection Canine Team - Use of Arson K-9 Team by other agencies. Fire Scene Examinations: Hourly Travel Rate: Mileage (round trip): Administrative reports Mounted Photographs: $50.00 per hour, two hour minimum $25.00 per hour, one hour minimum (to and from search area) $0.35 mile $25.00 per hour $1.50 each Board of Appeals - requiring a special meeting $245.00 Section 7.0 Geo~jraphic Information System Fees REQUEST FEE PARCEL DATABASE: (Digital format) $10,000.00 There are 8 layers included in this database: Lotlines, rights-of-way, ownership, situs addresses, Assessor Parcel Numbers, street names, street centerlines, and assessment districts. Zoning Map 34 X 44" color $30.00 (2 "E" size sheets) Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" b/w $1.00 Plan Map (Vicinity) Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" color $5.00 Plan Map (Vicinity) General Plan Map 34 X 44" color $30.00 (2 "E" size sheets) Flood Plain Map 34 X 44" color $30.00 (2 "E" size sheets) Land Available for Poten- tial Development Report Citywide Report $25.00 Land Available for Poten- tial Development Report Residential Repo~ $15.00 ]9 Land Available for Poten- tial Development Report Com/I nd Report $15.00 Land Available for Poten- tial Development Report Specific Plan Repod $15.00 Land Available for Potential 34 X 44" color Development Citywide (2 "E" size sheets) Special Reports and/or Maps $50.00 Time and Materials with a $500.00 deposit Section 8.0 Library Fees (These fees have been adopted by the Library Board) FINES: Fines are based on item rather than patron. A child borrowing adult materials will be assessed an adult overdue fine. Per Day Maximum Fine Borrowing thresholds Overdue Fine: adult $0.25 Overdue Fine: children $0.10 Overdue Fine: video $1.00 Overdue Fine: CD Rom $2.00 Overdue Fine: magazine $0.10 $10.00 $5.00 $ 5.OO $5.OO $10.00 $10.00 $1.00 FEES FOR RENTAL Charge Loan Period Limit of Items Video Cassette Loan Fee $1.00 Business Video Series $2.00 Best seller videos $2.00 Audio Cassette Fee $0.25 CD Fee $0.25 Best Seller CD $0.50 Read Alongs $0.25 Best Seller Rental Books $1.00 CD Rom Software $2.00 Test/Deposit Books 7 days 4 video titles total per tape 3 days ........ per tape 3 days ........ per tape/S2 max 14 days 4 cassette titles per CD 14 days 4 CD titles per CD 14 days 4 CD titles per cassette 14 days 4 Readalong titles 7 days 4 books/no reserves 7 days 4 titles $20 refundable deposit charge; checks allowed; credit card allowed FEES FOR SERVICES Charge Interlibrary Loan Reserves Marketing Library Card Lost Library Card Collection Fee: Test Monitoring Fee: $2.00 $0.50 $3.OO $2.00 ~rregularcard;$3.00 ~r marketing card $15.00 per account $10.00 pertestsession 20 Access to on-line magazines Single sided disc: $35.00 $0.50 TECHNOLOGYCENTER In-house Computer Rental Printouts Color B&W $3.00 per hour $0.25 $0.15 PHOTOCOPIES Color photocopies $0.25 B & W photocopies Coin $0.15 Debit Card $0.10 Color photocopies $0.50 Microform copies $0.15 FEES FOR RESEARCH/ BUSINESS SERVICES Business Locator Services: $5.00 per business, no charge if business not located Brief Business Profile: $10.00 per business, no charge if not located Each additional profile $6.00 Business Lists on Demand: $0.05 cents per record, $10.00 minimum On line Data Base searches: Cost of online connect time plus $5.00 LOST MATERIALS Cost of Item Processing Fee Books Original Cost $5.00 Media Original Cost $6.00 Paperback Books Original Cost $2.50 Magazines Cover Price $1.50 DAMAGE FEES Charge Bar Code Removed Books: Cover damaged Plastic cover damaged Page torn Compact Discs: Broken Jewel Case Singles Doubles Loss of liner notes Loss of book/pams Video Cassettes: Shell replacement Storage case damage Audio Book Cases Double $2.00 List cost in computer $5.OO $2.OO $1.00 per page List cost in computer $1.50 $3.OO $5.OO $5.OO List cost in computer $5.OO $5.OO $5.OO 2] 4 Storage $6.00 12 Storage $7.00 Cassette boxes $1.00 Section 9.0 - Planning Fees 9.1 Applications Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum 9.2 9.3 set at 3X base fee. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Tentative Tract Map $2,987 $60.00 per d/u $8,961.00 Conditional Use Permit $2,921 $292.00 per acre $8,763.00 Dev/Des Review Res $2,851 $57.00 per d/u $8,553.00 (5 or more) Dev/Des Review - Comm/ Industrial $2,851 Initial Study $225 General Plan Amendment $2,866 Spec/Comm Plan Amend.* $2,866 Dev Distr Amendment* $2,866 $285.00 per acre $8,553.00 $22.00 per acre $ 675.00 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00 *Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment. Applications Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken up front. Application EIR Review - Sensitive Development Agreement Review Mitigation Plan - Complex Annexation Development Agreement New Specific/Community Plan EIR Preparation Other Application Fees Deposit Amount $10,000.00 $5,OOO.OO $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 22 Application Non-Construction CUP Uniform Sign Program Minor Exception Dev/Design Review: 4 du's or less Variance Variance: 4 du's or less Use Determination Preliminary Review Minor Development Review Time Extension Minor Time Extension Sign Permit Hillside Development Review 5 or more du's Hillside Development Review 4 or less du's Temporary Use Permit Temporary Use Model Home EIR Review Only Landmark Application Residential and Small Business Landmark Alteration Residential and Small Business Mills Act Application Residential and Small Business Mitigation Plan (Simple) Mitigation Plan (Complex) $ 435.00 $ 580.00 $ 170.00 $1,027.00 $ 871.00 $ 291.00 $ 315.00 $ 325.00 $ 296.00 $ 549.00 $ 136.00 $ 51.00 $1,462.00 $ 244.00 $ 68.00 $ 219.00 $2,370.00 $ 728.00 No Charge $ 835.00 No Charge $ 724.00 No Charge $ 719.00 See 7.2 9.5 - Appeal Fees Appeal of a City Planner Decision 2.3 62.00 16/ Appeal of a Commission Decision in Connection with an Application Appeal of a Tract Map $ 126.00 $ 251.00 9.6 - Other Fees Pre-application Review (Planning Commission) Entertainment Permit $ 571.00 Home Occupation Permit $ 53.00 Large Family Day Care Permit $ 170.00 Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses) $ 315.00 Recycling Facilities Permit $ 296.00 Status Map Application $ 15.00 Trail Easement Vacation $1190.00 Tree Removal/New Development $ 432.00 Tree Removal/Existing Development $ 72.00 Land Use Verification Report $ 25.00 $ 325.00 NOTE: Planning Division fees for documents, which are individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List Section 10.0 - Recreation Fees Following are current fees for recreation activities and rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered. Definition of classes of fees by groups. Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group 2: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which are located and based in the City whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's information night. Group 3: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, and social organizations which has paid 24 management and are located and based in the City. Group 4: City resident private party activity, City resident employee organizations, City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, and profit-making organizations. Neighborhood and Community Park Lighted Sports Venue Fees Commencing September 1, 1993, each user group shall be charged fees equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the costs of electricity used to provide light to that user group based on the most recent rates published by Southern California Edison (SCE). Commencing September 1, 1994, fees will be charged at one hundred percent (100%). Upon acceptance by the City of new parks in Rancho Cucamonga, a use fee of 100% of the full light costs shall be implemented. This fee shall include electrical usage and demand charges as outlined by Southern California Edison (SCE) rate policies. This use fee will be updated annually or as rate policies by SCE are amended. C lasses/WorkshopslPrograms Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Non-Resident Charge: A $5.00 fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not include one day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. Facility Rentals: Hourly fees for Monday through 5 p.m., Friday use as follows: (Friday, 5 p.m. and later, Saturday, Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. rate.) Building Rentals Hourly Fee GROUP ROOM TIME 1 2 3 4 5 SIZE Small 8am-5pm None $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $17.00 $17.00 $34.00 Small 5pm-8am None $ 8.00 $13.00 $27.00 $27.00 $54.00 Patio at Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center shall be rented only as a small room at 8am-5pm rate. Large 8am-5pm None $ 7.00 $12.00 $30.00 $30.00 $50.00 Large 5pm-8am None $12.00 $17.00 $40.00 $40.00 $70.00 Four hour minimum charge for large room use on Friday and Saturday nights. 25 Kitchen Hourly Fee 0 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 $10.00 $15.00 Other Fees If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.00 per hour for staff time. When a damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.00. Per Day Charges Coffee Pot (small) $ 5.00 Coffee Pot (large) $10.00 Small Stage $20.00 Large Stage $50.00 T.V. W/video player $20.00 Microphone $10.00 Small PA system $40.00 Slide/Overhead Projector $10.00 Piano $25.00 Professional Lighting Tree or Spot $40.00 (Staff for lighting at $1 O/hr.) (The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost.) Community Amphitheater: The following are rental fees for amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for Groups 2 and 3. GROUP USAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stage-fiat fee None $25.00 $40.00 $72.00 $80.00 $95.00 Sound Monitor/hrly None $12.00 $12.00 $30.00 $30.00 $43.00 Equestrian Center Fees and Charges will be as follows: Hourly Room Rental* Small 8am-5pm Small 5pm-8am Daily Snack Bar/** Kitchen Lights*** GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 None $ 4.00 $ 800 $17.00 $17.00 $34.00 None $ 8.00 $13.00 $27.00 $27.00 $54.00 N/C $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 100% ACTUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION 26 Annual Shared N/C $7500 N/A N/A N/A N/A Storage Fee Stora~je: For City Community Centers and Public Facilities, no storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Manager. *Includes use of P.A. System. **A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) ***The small arena will have a coin metered box for electrical cost recovery. Epicenter Stadium Complex Tournament Fees Group I & II Rental Fees Per Field Group III thru VI Field Rental* $120.00 $245.00 Deposit 75.00 75.00 Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost *Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. When additional City staffing, equipment and material is required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Adult Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event-related expenses. Community and Neighborhood Park Leagues & Tournaments A $50.00 non-refundable deposit is required to reserve fields. Said deposit shall apply to final field rental totals. Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $15.00 per hour. The applicant shall meet all comprehensive public liability insurance requirements for usage of facilities and provide additional equipment needed to hold the tournament at their own cost. Softball Field & Soccer Fields ¢Per Field) Organized Leagues & Tournaments Group 1 - 2 None Drag & Line* Groups I-IV Actual Cost Group 3 - 4 $20/2hr & less $35/4hr & less $65/AII day Bases* Group 5 - 6 $50/2hr & less $90/4 hr & less $140/AII day *Drag and Line fees include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. Groups I & II $20.00 per field Groups III & IV $40.00 per field *Bases are available only when renting the fields for a tournament. Fee is based on per field, per day, basis subject to availability by City. 27 Snack Bar: For City-owned snack bars located in City Parks. GROUP USAGE 1 2 3 - 6 Seasonal None $450.00 N/A Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged a fiat $300.00 seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City sponsored event. Storage: For City-owned storage located in City parks GROUP USAGE 1 2 3 - 6 Seasonal None $75.00 N/A R.C. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER Rental Rates Basketball Courts (Per Court-Athletic Use Only) Group 1 Group 2 - 4 Group 5 - 6 None $ 40 (2 hr & less) $ 50 (2hr & less) $ 75 (4 hr & less) $ 90 (4 hr & less) $100 (6 hr & less) $120(6 hr & less) Plus $15 per hour (2 staff) Cleaning/Damage Deposit $100.00 Racquetball Courts (Per Court) Group 1 Group 2- 4 Group 5- 6 None $ 45 (3 hr & less) $ 60 (3 hr & less) $ 75 (6 hr & less) $ 90 (6 hr & less) Plus $15 per hour (2 staff) Cleaning/Damage Deposit $100.00 EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FEES Stadium Facility a. Stadium Rental Rate Ticketed Events* $1,500 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales Non-Ticketed Events $2,000 per day b. Sky Box Rental Rate c. Cafe Area Rental Rate $50.00 per hour $50.00 per hour $30.00 per hour $30.00 per hour 28 Pavillion Area Rental Rate 1. Covered Pavillion 3rd base side 2. Open Pavillion 1st base side e. Event Expenses $50.00 per hour $30.00 per hour $25.00 per hour $15.00 per hour Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parking Lot Events a. Stadium On-Site Lots Ticketed Events* Non-Ticketed Events i. Rental rates for $500.00 per day Parking Lots A, B, C plus 10% of gross ticket sales $670.00 per day Parking Lots D, E, F $250.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $ 335.00 perday b. Expanded Parking Lots i. Parking Lot #1 $500.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $ 670.00 perday ii. Parking Lot #2 $250.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $ 335.00 per day iii, Parking Lot #3 or $1,500.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $2,000 perday Event Quadrant (A-F) $250.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $ 335.00 per day c. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay event-related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parking Rates** a. Baseball Events $2.00 per car; $15.00 per bus b. Concerts and Special Events $3.00 to $5.00 per car; $5.00 to $10.00 VIP per car, $15.00 per bus, depending on event 29 c. Parking Lot Events Concessions Option to charge $2.00 to $5.00 per car a. Food & Beverage 20% of gross sales - 10% for non-profit organizations utilizing the Adult Sports Park b. Merchandise and Novelties Miscellaneous 20% of gross sales to be negotiated -- books, tapes, CD's, programs, T-shirts, etc.; 10% for non-profit organizations. a. Commercial Filming Minimum of $1,000.00 to $4,000.00 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. b. Commercial Filming in Parking Lot Minimum of $500.00 to $2,000.00 per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. c. Commercial Photograph Minimum of $500.00 to $2,000.00 per day, depending on photography requirements, plus actual costs for City services. Audio Broadcast Recording Fee Taping - TV Location Credit Required $ 300.00 per performance $ 500.00 per performance $1,500.00 per performance e. Deposit Minimum of $500.00 to $2,500.00 per day, depending upon event/rental requirements. Additional Move-in Take Down/Move- Out Days 50% of daily event rental rate, Tent/Canopy Main- tenance Reserve Fee Minimum of $300.00 to $1,000.00 per event. depending upon event/rental requirements. * Based on Provisions of Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates apply to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (lot A) delineated in lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. Section 11.0 - Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department Fees Description Fees Fingerprinting $ 10.00 Criminal Reports Traffic Accident Reports Traffic Accident Reports - Mail Criminal History Letters Bicycle License *Special Event Jobs Costs associated with towing and releasing stored or impounded vehicles $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 15.00 $ 3.00 No Charge $ 75.00 **Citation proof of correction Copy of citation or other document, not a report, per page Public Information Clerk - Hourly Station Clerk- Hourly Station Clerk Supervisor - Hourly Secretary - Hourly Secretary II - Hourly Forensic Specialist II - Hourly Community Services Officer- Hourly Deputy Reserve- Hourly Deputy II - Hourly Deputy III - Hourly Sergeant- Hourly Lieutenant- Hourly Captain - Hourly Vehicle Cost - Hourly *There is no fee for special events. 15.00 5.OO 14.00 16.00 18.00 17.00 19.00 35.00 20.00 31.00 57.00 58.00 64.00 74.00 82.00 85.00 However, if security services are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or private security, these fees are separate. **This fee will not apply to persons residing or working within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or citations issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Police. Section 12.0 - Miscellaneous Fees Amendment to tax statements for prepaid assessments Bingo License Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts Dog Licensing See Resolution 81-79 Filming Permits Business License Tax Application Fee (Planning Fees) Basic Fee for each day of filming Investigation Fee Fire Department *per hour for each 3-man piece of equipment Police Department** (See Sheriff Fees) **Number and type of personnel is determined by the station commander after reviewing plans for the event. Home Park Rent Mediation - Filing Fee Home Park Rent Mediation - Appeal Fee Industrial Bond Development Bond Application A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum amount of the proposed bond application and not less than Massage Establishment Application Massage Technician Application Massage Outcall Service Renewal Massage Establishment Appl. Renewal Massage Tech. Application Renewal Massage Outcall Service School Fees - Please refer to Ordinance Nos. 69-C and 74 regarding these fees. Solicitor (Non-profit) identification badge Taxicab Service Application 20.00 50.00 7.5O $ 20.00 $ 129.00 $ 132.50 $ 110.00 per filming day $ 100.00 per Hr.* $ 15.00 $ 300.00 $1,250.00 $ 225.00 $ 178.00 $ 90.00 $ 111.00 $ 90.00 $ 45.00 $ 5.00 each $ 95.OO Taxicab Driver's Permit Application $ 120.00 Taxicab Service Application Renewal $ 45.00 Taxicab Driver's Permit Appl. Renewal $ 60.00 c. Effective Date: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day of November, 1997. Executed this 6th day of November, 1997 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk /// DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03 CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. Consideration of a request to amend the Sign Ordinance by adding regulations to allow for the identification of subtenants of a major or anchor tenant within shopping centers. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval through adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND At its November 12, 1997, meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed regulations for subtenant signs. After receiving public input, the Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment. The Commission concurred that the proposed sign regulations will address a current market trend of placing subtenants (primarily financial institutions) within the major tenant of a shopping center. The new regulations establish that the project Uniform Sign Program may identify subtenants, define a subtenant, establish a minimum floor area for tenants that may identify a subtenant, establish a minimum floor area for subtenants, identify that only one subtenant of a major tenant may be permitted signage, identify that subtenants may have monument sign identification, and require the subtenant to be a manned facility. The purpose of the Uniform Sign Program is to ensure that the design and placement of different types of signs within the shopping center relate to, and are compatible with, the building design and site improvements. City Planner BB:TG:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Ordinance Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 12, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes dated November 12, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution 97-59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 12, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03 - CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. - A request to amend the Sign Ordinance by adding regulations to allow for the identification of subtenants of a major or anchor tenant within shopping centers. BACKGROUND: On October 8, 1997, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 97-19 for the development of a commercial shopping center located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Conditions of approval for the project require submittal of a Uniform Sign Program to establish criteria for the placement of signs throughout the center. To address project needs and a current business trend that places financial institutions within supermarkets, the applicant submitted this request to allow for the placement of subtenant signage for their proposed tenants. Following the final determination on this amendment, the project's Uniform Sign Program will be reviewed by Planning staff. On a related note, the Planning Commission recently approved Sign Ordinance Amendment 97-01 to add regulations that allow for the identification of subtenants within Service Stations. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a request to amend the Sign Ordinance to allow signage for a subtenant of a major or anchor tenant as well to establish specific definitions and design requirements for their placement (see Exhibit "A"). Staff supports a revision to the Sign Ordinance to allow for the identification of subtenants of a major or anchor store. The specific criteria for the size and location of subtenant signs is not included as it will be established through each individual project's Uniform Sign Program. Proposed text changes to allow for the establishment of subtenant sign criteria include: The Uniform Sign Program may establish criteria for the placement of subtenant signs of a major or anchor tenant. A subtenant is defined as a business that is owned or operated by the major or anchor tenant, and/or franchisee or subsidiary of the major or anchor tenant; and whose operation is separate from, unrelated to, and different from the major or anchor tenant. A major or anchor tenant occupying a floor area in excess of 50,000 square feet may provide subtenant signage. 4. A subtenant must occupy a minimum of 400 square feet of floor area. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SOA 97-03 - CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. November 12, 1997 Page 2 5. Only one subtenant of a major or anchor tenant will be permitted signage. 6. The identification of subtenants may be allowed on the monument sign. Only a manned subtenant may be provided signage. Interior or exterior ATM machines are not considered subtenants. Regarding the request to change the monument sign criteria, the Sign Ordinance currently provides what the applicant is requesting. In addition to specific criteria for project identification signs, there are two types of monument signs permitted. Either two 24 square foot monument signs per street frontage, 300 feet apart, or one 48 square foot monument sign for street frontages in excess of 500 feet. Both the Foothill Boulevard and the Vineyard Avenue street frontages of the project site are in excess of 500 feet. Letter sizes are limited to a minimum height of 8-inches without a limit to the specific number of tenants as the number of tenants identified will be determined by the Uniform Sign Program. The remainder of the applicant's request focuses on the establishment of specific definitions and design criteria that are more appropriate for their project's Uniform Sign Program. Their Uniform Sign Program will identify and define on which elevations signs will be permitted, what constitutes a logo, and what tenants will be permitted subtenant signage. Further, the Uniform Sign Program will also define applicable specific design requirements, which must be consistent with all applicable Sign Ordinance requirements ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed sign regulations are categorically exempt per Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment 97-03. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council A-I June 2,1997 Nancy Fong, AICP Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Ddve P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Two proposals for Sign Ordinance Amendment to provide for secondary signage for a sub-tenant of a major or anchor tenant. NWC of Foothill Drive and Vineyard Avenue/97-340-11 Dear Ms. Fong: Enclosed please find our check of $2,866.00 for the Sign Ordinance amendment application fee. We are requesting Sign Ordinance Amendments involving the following two items: The existing sign ordinance does not provide for a sub-tenant sign on a major or anchor tenant front wall (such as a bank sub-tenant in a major chain grocery store). We are proposing such an amendment to the City's Sign Ordinance. Please see the attached Exhibit A for details of our proposal. The existing ordinance only permits the theme name of the shopping center plus two tenants (or three tenants) on the monument sign facing each street. The shopping center plan includes five buildings with the potential to capture approximately one dozen tenants. We are proposing that this monument sign be allowed to identify the theme name and four tenants (or five tenants). We would recommend minimum six inch letters, measured vertically, for the capital letters of the anchor and tenants. With the 'eight line rule" applied to each tenant, the overall sign area would still be limited to 24 square feet. Please see the attached proposed sign drawing for an example sign. If you require additional information or have any question please call Bob Cummins or me at (800) 266-9080. Sincerely, enclosures INFORMAlION IS OUR BUSINESS · Soft,~are · Market · Architedure/Engi~eeHn g · Financial Services Castillo Company. Inc. 2345 E. Univ~rsitt Drive Phoenix, AZ RO. Box 21087 Phoenix, AZ 8~36-!027 Tel 6O2 /1,5' CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 2, 1997 EXHIBIT A A. DEFINITIONS Our proposed amendment would add the following definitions to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance: Front: Building or store frontage facing toward a street; building or store frontage facing toward the shopping center main parking lot; building or store frontage facing toward shopping center' entrance drives. Logo: A graphic symbol representing an activity, use or business; logos shall be registered trademarks or symbols commonly used by the occupant's business and may include graphic designs in addition to lettering. Sub-tenant: occupancy store.) A tenant of an unrelated business located within a major or anchor tenant that has a minimum of 30,000 square feet. (Example: A bank w/thin a grocery B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Where monument signs are located on shopping center or building frontages, for the identification of the businesses within the center, one of the tenant sign spaces may be used for sub-tenant identification. C. SUB-TENANT WALL SIGN DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A financial institution as a sub-tenant to a major or anchor tenant, may be provided a signage area on the building front of the anchor tenant. The sub-tenant shall be permitted a sign area up to 35 square feet, including logo and lettering. The sign may have a maximum logo height of 30" (2'-6") and letter height of 18" (1'-6"). This sign area shall not be deducted from the sum total sign area permitted for the major or anchor tenant. The sub-tenant signage shall be designed and placed as an integral part of the store or building facade in a manner complimentary to the overall design concept of the shopping center. Automated Teller Machine (ATM) signage shall be located on the face of the machine. The area of such signage shall not exceed 12 square feet. The bezel and architectural border shall not be calculated as a component of the sign area unless they contain sign characters, logos, or other signage graphic images. This sign area shall not be deducted from the sum total sign area allowed for the anchor tenant. Words and graphics which instruct persons on the use of the ATM shall not be considered a part of the sign area unless they remain readable beyond the boundaries of the shipping center. //7 i ~L Z d I- Z ILl Z u"lz ~ 0 )- z _ k) Z Z z - ~.,eann~her testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by McNiel, se~ed by Tolstoy, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Parcel Map 15'b31. .M~t;,.,~l carned~,~ following vote: AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY'~ NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried F. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03 - CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. - A request to amend the Sign Ordinance by adding regulations to allow for the identification of subtenants of a major or anchor tenant within shopping centers. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Bethel asked if a hot dog stand of 20 feet x 20 feet could have a sign. Mr. Grahn confirmed that it could. Commissioner Bethel feared that monument signs will then look like those in other cities. Brad Buller, City Planner, pointed out that the size of monument signs is limited and that too many names on a sign makes the sign copy unreadable. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. John Viaming, Castillo Co., Inc. 2345 East University Drive, Phoenix, Arizona, felt it is a good idea to allow subtenant signage on monument signs. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that retail business has changed over the years. He remarked that he would have said it was inappropriate to allow subtenant signage when the original sign ordinance was written; however, he felt it is now appropriate to allow such signage. He suppoded wall signage; but was concerned there may be requests for more monument signage if subtenant signs are allowed. Mr. Buller stated that up to eight names may be placed on a monument sign. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that should allow for subtenants in some centers. Commissioner Macias concurred with Commissioner Tolstoy. Commissioner McNiel agreed with respect to service stations. He observed that separate signs have been allowed for different uses predicated upon separate entrances; i.e., Office Max, Furniture Max, Copy Max. He commented the Commission previously approved a grocery store at the nodhwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with multiple subtenants. He said he could find a bank in a grocery store without having exterior signage. He expressed hesitation regarding starling the process on eternal expansion of subtenants. Commissioner Bethel concurred with Commissioner McNiel. Chairman Barker concurred with Commissioners Tolstoy and Macias. Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 12, 1997 Motion: Moved by Maclea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Sign Ordinance Amendment 97-03. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BARKER, MACIAS, TOLSTOY BETHEL, MCNIEL NONE - carried Commissioner Tolstoy commented that he did not feel a McDonalds sign should be allowed. .~.e Planning Commission recessed from 9:44 p.m. to 9:55 p.m. ' G. APPEAL Ot~TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 97-16- RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE - Aapn peal oNCe City Planneds decision regarding tree replacement for the removal of 10 trees at the Red Hill ~ Club Golf Course, located at 8353 Red Hill Country Club Drive - APN: 207-011-49 and 207-%3, 23, and 35. Brent Le Count, Associate Plar~er, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker invited public clement. E I Lard ' dem r 2, 249DelMarinc, La~.erne, stated he is President of Red Hill Golf Course and he ' t d d J' Port~r, the PGA profess'~who is responsible for overseeing the course. He said h d'd t b r Red~l l ill Golf Course was'T'"a~into account when the ordinance was written. He th h tt h h~, 050 trees andsaid they%are an integral part of the golf course and require management and maintenance. He repoded that i' costs about $1,000 to trim and $2,000 to replace a tree. He pointed out where the trees were ren~ved from and stated they are far removed from adjacent properties. He said the 10 trees were rer~oved because of wind damage, being dead, or growing into the sycamores and oaks. He said the ~nes by the sycamores and oaks were removed in order to enhance the growth of the sycamores an~oaks. He said they budgeted $50,000 for tree management last year and $70,000 this year. He N~d not feel it is appropriate to require them to replace trees on a one-to-one basis because of the ~3.,~ity of trees they have on their 140 acres. He reported they replace trees when they are removed if-'tr~uy ,,;%~n integral part of the playability of the course. He said their golf course architect indicates which~rees should be removed and where new trees should be planted. He asked the Commission t~trelieve them from having to replace the 10 trees and to determine if the ordinance should apply to ~e golf course. He said they may lose 15-20 trees in one windstorm. He said they understand that ~ey would then be required to get a permit to remove the trees and they may be out of business wf~e waiting for that permit. He said if they lose 10 trees, it represents less than 1 percent of their tota'l,,~ees, while removing 1 or 2 trees from an individual home may represent 100 percent. , , Commissioner Bethel asked if the 10 trees were removed for wind damage . Mr. Linder responded that three were removed for wind damage, two to three were taken out because they were growing into the sycamores and oaks, and the others were dead. He stat~td they were not aware they needed a permit when they removed the tree He sas. id there are an addShal 10 to 15 dead trees. He stated they have a bark beetle that h ' fasl en .ate,.. so e,d ,om f, thetrees those trees need to be removed immediately because thebeetl q 'ckles u] yspr., d._. a ,e ,t u,os. rround!ng trees. He asked that they be able to work out something with C't persy nnelra ht erthan going through a tree removal permit process. Planning Commission Minutes "~),~" -7- November 12, 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 97-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE SIGN ORDINANCE WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF SUBTENANTS OF A MAJOR OR ANCHOR TENANT WITHIN SHOPPING CENTERS WITHIN SECTION 14.20.100 PERMITTED SIGNS - COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Castillo Company, Inc., has filed an application for Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 97-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Sign Ordinance Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of November 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducded a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission oF the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 12, 1997, including written and oral staff repods, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. b. The Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. 3. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the proposed amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 97-03 to modify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RE~OLUTION NO. SOA 97-03 - CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. November 12, 1997 Page 2 97-59 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1997. PLANNING COM~ I ~r_. CII..~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA " I, Brad Bullet, Secretaw of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedi~ that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEBS: BARKER, M,~CIA$, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BETHEL, HCNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO..~ <~, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 97-03, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF SUBTENANTS OF A MAJOR OR ANCHOR TENANT WITHIN SHOPPING CENTERS WITHIN SECTION 14.20.100 PERMITTED SIGNS COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES. A. Recitals. 1. On the 12th day of November 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-59, thereby recommending the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 97-03. 2. On the 17th day of December 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 14.20.100 Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones is hereby amended as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 2: The Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and .circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. cO 0 N 0 E E 0 0 0 0 · )- I- z C) LU oo ~E ~-~ 0 N 0 0 0 0 >- Z t- O N 0 E E 0 0 (~ 0 w >- Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION DENYING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERM1T TO BELL CAB CO. On November 5, 1997, the City Council held a public hearing to determine if the public interest, convenience and necessity was met by the issuance of a taxicab service permit to Bell Cab Co. After hearing the testimony, the City Council directed that a resolution denying the permit be prepared for their consideration. Attached for the City Council is the resolution denying the issuance of the permit and making findings in support of that decision. The findings listed in the resolution are as follows: Adequate taxicab service already is being provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. o Permitting an additional company to provide taxicab service in the City of Rancho Cucamonga will create financial difficulties for both providers and thereby depreciate the level of service provided to persons in Rancho Cucamonga who require service. Upon adoption of this resolution, official notice of the denial of the permit will be forwarded to Bell Cab Co. and will conclude the proceedings as outlined in Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Respectfully Submitted, Assistant to the City Manager /dab RESOLUTION NO. q 7-/~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT. A. Recita!.~. (i) Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, an application was filed by BELL CAB COMPANY ("the application" hereinafter) for a permit to operate a taxicab service within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (ii) The application was processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and a duly noticed public heating concerning the application was conducted and concluded on November 5, 1997. B. Resob'tion. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: All of the facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this resolution are lxue and correct. 2. Based upon substantive evidence presented during the above- referenced public hearing, this Council hereby finds and determines as follows: a. Adequate taxicab service already is being provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and b. Permitting an additional company to provide taxicab service in the City of Rancho Cucamonga will create financial difficulties for both providers and thereby depreciate the level of service provided to persons in Rancho Cucamonga who require the service. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above- referenced hearing and the specific findings made in Paragraph 2 above, this Council 1 EXHIBIT "A" hereby finds, determines and concludes that the public interest, convenience and necessity do not justify granting the application and issuing the permit applied for. 4. Based on the findings, determinations and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application. 5. The applicant, BELL CAB COMPANY, hereby is notified that the time during which judicial review of the decision embodied in this Resolution must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Provide a true and correct copy of this Resolution to BELL CAB COMPANY at 1312 West Brook Street, Ontario, California 91762, together with a copy of the certificate of mailing thereof, all by first-class mail, postage prepaid. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 19th day of November, 1997. Mayor I, DEBRA ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ~ day of ,1997, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ~day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ,1997, by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 13/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 'DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner UPDATE ON RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME LOCATED AT 9204 APRICOT AVENUE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City continue to work with the Department of Public Social Services and monitor the progress of the State Group Home Task Force and the residential group home located at 9204 Apricot Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Planning staff, in coordination with the Police Department, has contacted the Department of Public Social Services and notified Ramon Rodriguez, the state representative that oversees the license for the residential group home, located at 9204 Apricot Avenue and other licensed facilities in the City, that the City Council has agendized this matter for their December 17, 1997, meeting. Staff has requested that a representative from the Department of Public Social Services attend, if possible. The City of Claremont has been contacted, per City Council direction, for follow-up information on their efforts regarding residential group homes. According to Ms. Tammy Gates, Management Analyst from the City Manager's office, the Mayor of Claremont chairs a statewide task force on this issue. The task force consists of representatives from cities, counties, State legislators and Assemblymen, and representatives from community care facilities. The task force last met to discuss the issue at the League of California Cities Conference in San Francisco in October. The task force will be forwarding a report with specific recommendations for the Governor's review by January, 1998. Ms. Gates anticipates the task force to reconvene in the spring of 1998. She appreciates our support of Claremont's concerns and will place Rancho Cucamonga on her list to receive future information on the subject. She suggested that Rancho Cucamonga also contact Assemblyman Joe Baca, author of AB323. This Assembly Bill places more accountability on residential care facilities; such as requiring investigation of complaints, additional notification to law enforcement agencies, etc. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME December 17, 1997 Attached is a list of residential care facilities in the City. A map which shows the distribution of residential group homes within the City will be available for Council review at the meeting. City Planner BB:NF:taa Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Definitions Exhibit "B" - List of Residential Care Facilities TERMS DEFINED BY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Residential Elderly Care Facility - provides 24-hour care for adults 60 years of age or older Adult Residential Facility - provides 24-hour care for adults who are 18-59 years old. Group Home - provides 24-hour care for children under 18 years of age who are mentally disordered, developmentally disabled, or physically handicapped and who require special care and supervision as a result of such disabilities. Intermediate Care Facility - provides 24-hour care for people from birth to death who are developmentally disordered or in need of constant nursing~. ~Term defined by the Inland Valley Regional Center. RESIDENTIAL ELDERLY CARE 22733160 Therese's Little Flower 7434 Henbane Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 22521154 Vintage Elite Guest Home 11342 Mt. Abbott Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 1O6159147 Walnut Grove Manor 5572 Amethyst Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 20905113 Wisdom Guest Home 8720 Pasito Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES 20847108 Balsa Home, The 9684 Balsa Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20928115 Bass Family Home 8660 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20134165 Garden Home 9212 Garden Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20723202 Ibanez Care Home 8614 Vinmar Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20870215 Langston House 9656 Langston Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 106139146 M.O. Unity 9388 Valley View Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 20180162 Raymond Community Care Home 8379 Garden Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20705303 Red Hill 7628 Alta Cuesta Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20716133 Rosalin Adult Group Home 8262 Placida Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20929105 Rose Manor 9254 N. Kirkwood Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 106243149 Rose Villa 9204 Apricot Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME 20847108 Balsa Home, The 9684 Balsa Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 107609103 Del Rosario's Small Family Home 10123 Finch Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 106167120 Downtain Home, The 8599 Hillside Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20227105 Field's Comprehensive Youth Sewices Corp. 7062 Napa Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20936164 Giles Home for Boys 9582 Edelweiss Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20235208 Jetton Small Family Home 8806 Holly Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 2O847503 Torres Small Family Home 9566 Balsa Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 107725175 Tres Caminos, Inc. - Marine St. House 7652 Marine Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20192235 Xinia's Family Care Home 11241 Vintage Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 INTERMEDIATE CARE FACILITIES 20175117 Alta Loma House 10366 Alta Loma Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20205517 Beryl House 7119 Beryl Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20827215 Calle House 9429 Calle Vejar Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 107626171 Hermosa House 10277 Monte Vista Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 107629101 Kenyon House 6979 Mesada Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 106168131 Kingston House 5612 Dresden Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 107622105 La Vine House 9939 La Vine Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20876155 Logan House 8271 Onyx Coud Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 20257171 Monte Vista House 9358 Monte Vista Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 107707129 Monterey House 7380 Cartilia Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 20883117 Norwood House 7817 Sauterne Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 107704127 Teak House 7312 TeakWay Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 17, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facilities issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Lions East Community Center: · Clean-up of the Lions East Project is continuing. Contractor is re-installing flooring material, atter which the cabinets will be reinstailed, and the duct work cleaned. Anticipate completion in early January. Lions West Community Center: · The start date for construction of this project is anticipated to be in mid-January, upon the completion of the Lions East Community Center. Once construction begins it is estimated that improvements will require approximately 5 months to complete. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center: · Restroom partitions are scheduled for installation during the month of December. · The expanded parking lot construction project is scheduled for bid - opening on January 6th, with award of the contract anticipated on January 21, 1998. RC Family Sports Center: · Final items are being completed and the Grand Opening is scheduled for Saturday, December 13th, from 12 noon - 4 pm. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 17, 1997 Page 2 Civic Center: · Council Chambers--Electric has been installed for camera. The fabrication of the metal work will be done 12/4, and powder coating will follow. Civic Center--Lighting to celebrate the upcoming holiday season is up! Lights were also installed at the Metrolink station. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library: · Repairs are in progress to the air conditioning unit for the lower level Circulation area. Stadium: · A handrail has been installed at the entrance to the First Base Cafe. Also, painting is in progress on the 3rd floor of the stadium. This shotfid be completed by December 11. · Stadium turf renovation is complete this month and grass is germinating. Etiwanda Creek Park: · Staff is preparing plans to relocate the Pop Warner trailers based on comments received from other City Departments and Pop Warner. · Renovation and replanting of the "meadow area" at Etiwanda Creek Park was completed this month. Old weedy plant material was removed and replaced with a meadow grass mix. The new mix will allow maintenance crews to perform selective weed control in the meadow, resulting in a more appealing area which will attract park patrons as an area to picnic and relax. Heritage and Red Hill Parks: · All buildings were repainted this month. Bear Gulch Park: · The removal of the Bear Gulch tot lot equipment began at the end of this month. The ADA compliant replacement equipment installation will begin in December. Information signs regarding the project have been placed around the site. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE R.C. Family Sports Center: · The grand opening for the R.C. Family Sports Center was held this past Saturday between 12 noon and 4:00 p.m.. The event was co-sponsored by the City, Lewis Homes Management Corporation and Orchard Supply Hardware. Community members were able to participate CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 17, 1997 Page 3 in a tree lighting ceremony and holiday sing along with Alta Loma, Etiwanda and Rancho Cucamonga High School chorales. The afternoon also featured appearances by local mascots, RC Coyote, Slick A. Saurous, McGruff, and Tremor/Aftershock, arts and craft vendors, and children's activities. Demonstrations of various sport activities also took place during the event. Vietnam Memorial: · Staff has spoken with Bill Alexander, VFW Post 8680 representative. Mr. Alexander has sent a letter on December 4th to Mr. DeVitt, the representative for the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall, asking for notification as soon as possible so fundraising, and advertising of the Memorial in the community can begin. To date, Mr. Alexander has not heard back from Mr. DeVitt. Staff will keep the Council apprised of any progress made on this effort. Senior Van Transportation: · Staff has spoken with AI Newman, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Service Club. Due to a death in Mr. Newman's immediate family this project has been put on hold until after the first of the year. Staff will keep the Council apprised of any progress made on this effort. Teen Activities: · On Saturday, December 20, 1997, teens will have the opportunity to join us for the ultimate roller coaster experience with a trip to Magic Mountain. Cost of the trip is $25 per person and includes admission ticket, transportation and chaperones. Upcoming activities include two ski trips (January 19 and February 16) to the slopes of Mountain High in Wrightwood, and a Babysitters Workshop on January 24th in the City Council Chambers. Youth Activities: Two hundred and forty youngsters attended Breakfast with Santa on Saturday, December 6, 1997 at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club donated and prepared a delicious pancake breakfast. The event also included songs, activities and a special visit with Santa. Trips and Tours: · Huntington Harbor "Cruise of Lights" - December 20th, 1997. Beautifully decorated waterfront homes in Huntington Harbor will be on display as we wind our way through the channels. (Trip sold out). /q/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 17, 1997 Page 4 Rose Parade - January 1, 1998. A hassle free trip to view the country's most watched parade. (Trip sold out). Senior Citizen Activities/Events: · Holiday Craft Fair - The annual "crafty seniors" holiday craft sale was held on December 4th at the Senior Center. Unique and creative items were available for all those holiday shoppers who prefer not to shop at the mall. Holiday Event - December 23, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. at the Senior Center featuring Will Donato and the musical group "The Out of Sax". A visit by Santa will be part of the fun and homemade goodies will be served. We hope you can join us at the Senior Center for this fun-filled annual holiday event. New Year Celebration - December 31, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. Join us as we celebrate the coming new year. There will be plenty of non-alcoholic champagne and festivities. Human Services: · The Dr is In Seminars - December 15, 1997 -- 12 noon-2:00 p.m. Topic: Depression: Holiday Blues and You. January 13, 1998 Topic: Foot Problems and Diabetics. Living, Learning and Laughing Seminar - January 14, 1998 -- 10:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m-. Topic: Healthy Cooking and Eating Habits. Food demonstration and recipes too. Agewise Seminars - December 5, 1997 -- 10:30a. m.-12 noon. Topic: How to Bear the Blues. January 2, 1998. Topic: Grandparenting or Grandparents Raising Grandchildren. Elder Law Matters- December 19, 1997 -- 11:00 a.m.-12 noon---Topic: Advantages/Disadvantages of Reverse Mortgage. January 23, 1998. Topic: A Comparison of Long Term Care Insurance Policies. Commodity Distribution - January 5, 1998 -- 1:30 p.m.- 3:30 p.m.. USDA surplus food will be distributed on a first come first served basis to low income residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Proof of income and residency required. Approximately 550 residents participate in this monthly distribution. Equestrian Center: · Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy - December 21, 1997. Benefit show 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. (rescheduled from December 7, 1997). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 17, 1997 Page 5 Community Wide Special Events: · For your information attached is the 1998 Community Services Department Calendar of Special Events. Respectfully submitted, Co~ ~n~ lopme ent Director / ~Z~services Manager RG:SO:KME Attachment Community Servlees Department 1998 Calendar of Events FEBRUARY 12th Senior Event - Valentines Day Event Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am o 11:30 am MARCH 7th & 8th 28th Senior Fine Art/Photography Show Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 5 pm (7th), 1 pm- 4 pm (8th) Senior Talent Showcase (5 Cities) Montclair Community Center APRIL 9th 11th Senior Event - Spring Fling Event Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 11:30 am Children's Musical Concert Epicenter 1p.m. 18th Teen Job Fair Location to be announced 1 pm- 5 pm MAY · · o 3rd 9th 16th Cinco De Mayo Old Town Park 10 am- 4 pm Art in the Park Red Hill Community Park 10 am - 4 pm Step Out for Seniors Red Hill Community Park 9 am - 2 pm JUNE 2nd 6th Playschool Graduation Red Hill Community Park 6 prn - 7:30 pm Open House Lions Park Commtmity Center 9 am - noon ,JULY 2nd 4th 7th - 28th 8th- 29th 9th - 3oth 10th - 31st Senior Event - July 4th Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 11:30 am July 4th Celebration Red Hill Community Park 10 am - 4 pm Movies in the Park Red Hill Community Park (Tuesdays) Dusk Movies in the Park Windrows Park (Wednesdays) Dusk Concerts in the Park Red Hill Community Park (Thursdays) 7 pm - 9 pm Movies in the Park Milliken Park (Fridays) Dusk AUGUST 4th & 11th 5th & 12th Movies in the Park Red Hill Community Park (Tuesdays) Dusk Movies in the Park Windrows Park (Wednesdays) Dusk 6th & 13th Concerts in the Park Red Hill Community Park (Thursdays) 7 pm - 9 pm 7th & 14th Movies in the Park Milliken Park (Fridays) Dusk 27th Senior Event - International Day Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 11:30 am OCTOBER 21st 24th 29th College Fair Location to be announced 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm Pumpkin Carving Workshop Red Hill Community Park (Pre-Registration required) 10 am - noon Senior Event - Halloween Event Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 11:30 am NOVEMBER 7th Founders Day Parade & Celebration Parade - Base Line Rd. between Carnelian and Ramona Celebration - Adult Sports Park Parade - 9:30 am - noon, Celebration 10 am - 4 pm DECEMBER 5th 22nd Breakfast with Santa Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (Pre-Registration required) 8 am & 10 am Senior Event - Holiday Event Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 10 am - 11:30 am Iq? DATE: T~. FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA., STAFF REPORT "" December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Community Foundation Subcommittee RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COMMUNYrY FOUNDATION On December 10, 1997, the subcommittee met with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors to discuss the relationship of the organizations as well as the future of the Foundation. The discussion covered the history of the Foundation leading up to the present. More importantly, the discussion covered the possible future of the Foundation and how it might best benefit the City and its residents. The result of these discussions was that the subcommittee still felt that there is a need for a Foundation whatever that evolution might entail. Considering the Foundation's original mission of supporting cultural, recreational and human service needs of the community it seems that there might be an opportunity to provide better focus to the Foundation as well as a more direct linkage to the City Department most responsible for these functions, Community Services. The end result would be a Foundation that worked in direct support of cultural, recreational and human service programs undertaken by the Community Services Department for the benefit of our residents. This can be accomplished by having the Park and Recreation Commission assume the responsibility of the Foundation since they currently interact with the Community Services Department or we can determine the feasibility of having a Foundation and a Commission work with the Community Services Department. The City's policy has been not to provide staff support for the Foundation. The reasoning was based on a recommendation by a special attorney retained by the Foundation that it would be in the best interests of the Foundation to be as separate as possible. In addition, at the time of the Foundation's original formation there was some concern that the non-profit status could be lost if ties between the organizations were too close. A cursory review of this matter by the accountant for the Foundation and by the City Attorney's Office show that this is not a concern any longer. At this time, the subcommittee is seeking direction from the full City Council to develop a recommendation on adjusting the structure of the Community Foundation in a manner that is in the best interest of the City. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk IDENTIFICATION OF ITEM FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Gutierrez asked if we could please identify for the next meeting to review the Recreational Vehicle (RV) Code. Please bring that up at the appropriate time on the agenda. /dja Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUC.M%,IONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk DECEMBER 17, 1997 AGENDA Redevelopment Agency D.3. Approval to review and accept the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for fiscal year 1997/98. Correction: for fiscal year 1996/97 City Council I. 1. A resolution denying a taxi cab service permit to Bell Cab Co. Comment: Received phone calls this date fi'om Michelle Gray and Mike Hirz stating they are in favor of cab competition in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lVI MORAND DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 17, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk TAXI CAB PERMIT AGENDA ITEM I1 The following individual contacted the City Clerk's office this date to express support of granting the taxi cab permit to Bell Cab Company: Randy Schackman - Sunset Haven Senior Facilities 12-17-1997 P 1 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga find and resolve as follows: There is a house located at the northwest. comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This house is commonly called "The Isle's House" because it was owned for most of the twentieth century by descendents of James C. and Martha E. Isle. o The Isle's House was built by the Chaffey Brothers, George, William and Charles for their mother Ann and sister Emma. Ann and Emma did reside in the house during and after the Chaffey Brothers' founding of Etiwanda, Ontario and Upland. The Isle's House is the only house built by the Chaffey Brothers in these Model Colonies (Etiwanda, Ontario and Upland). The Chaffey Brothers consisted of George who provided the inspiration, leadership and engineering skill, William who provided the agricultural skills and Charles who possessed the management and financial skills. In addition there was Ellswood Chaffey who became Ontario's first physician. The Chaffey Brothers have been determined to be among the most important pioneers of. Southern California. Not only did they develop towns, but they charted a course which was followed over and over again throughout California and beyond. Among the accomplishments of the Chaffey Brothers are (a) ship construction patents, first mutual water company in California, (c) inspiration for the first mumaI telephone company in California, (d) first electric light in Southern California, (e) first hydro-electrically powered light in Western United States, (f) one-time holders of the record for the longest distance telephone call, (g) engineering feats in gathering and delivering water fi'om mountain sources to agricultural lands, (h) founders of a bank which, through many mergers, still exists today, FR©t~ P (i) O) (1) (m) (n) (o) founders and benefactors of Chaffey College, donors of land to many churches and educational facilities in Ontario and Upland, founders of Etiwanda, Ontario, Upland, Renmark in Australia, Mildura in Australia, Man:,anar and involved in the establishment of Mexicali and Calexico, among other cities, chief engineer for the first electric street light system in Los Angeles which thereby became the first major city in the world to be lit excIusively by electricity, builder of the Imperial Canal taking water from the Colorado River through Mexico and back into the Imperial Valley of California enabling it to become a major agricultural reg/on, later refused to be involved in the expansion of the canal, predicting a disastrous flood which did occur in 1905 and recreated the Salton Sea, creating "model colonies" with sound foundations in agriculture, commerce, education and the arts, providing a balanced beginning for many communities still in existence more than 100 years later and still benefiting from the model provided by the Chaffey Brothers. The Isle's House is in the Route 30 Corridor. The planned freeway route goes through the Isle's House. The planned freeway is very important to the transportation needs of the region. It is not economically feasible to route the freeway around the Isle's House. Accordingly, the Isle's House must either be destroyed or moved. While the Rains House is important because it is older and it is tied to the Spanish and Mexican control of the region, and while the Chaffey-Garcia House is older and it is important because George Chaffey and his family resided in it from about 1881 until about 1884, the Isles' House transcends each of these historic landmarks and all other historic landmarks in the region due to its construction by the Chaffey Brothers. It is extremely important to the historic preservation efforts and cultural values of this community that this historic site be 1997 preserved by moving it out of the path of the freeway. It can be moved. It should be moved. Indeed, because it can never be recreated and it belongs to all generations of this community including those still to come, it must be preserved; it must be moved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, having been created at the time the Jarvis-Gann Initiative put strict limits on real property taxes, is a municipality with far more limited tax resources than older cities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has many needs which eatmot all be met with the tax revenues available to the City. The City has been able to accomplish a great deal, particularly with parks, recreation, library and street improvement on a very limited budget. The City also played a major role in saving the Chaffey-Garcia House with only modest expenditures from the City's general funds, primarily by using outside sottrees for the neeessay funding. Due to the major importance of this historic site, the City of Rancho Cucamonga does pledge to do anything and everything it can possibly do or an-ange to have done to move the Isle's House a new location which is appropriate for the safety of the house, makes the house available to the public as an historic structure of great importance and facilitates the preservation of the house. Therefore, it 1. o is resolved as follows: The City of Rancho Cucamonga gives its moral support to reasonable attempts to save the house. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages local residents interested in historic preservation to get involved in the effort to save the house. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is hopeful that private groups including churches, schools, scouts, historic preservation groups, cultural promotion groups and others will become interested in saving the Isle's House and use all reasonable means to save it. 12-17-1997 If, after financial support cannot be located from outside sources, the residents have made a diligent effort to save the house but cannot because of limited resources, and all of the best efforts of all of the interest groups fail despite the tremendous investment of time and energy by their members, it is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve as a backup to other private efforts and, if necessary to commit City owned property and up to Fifty Thousand Doll~.rs of City funds or City arranged funds to move the house out of the pafl~ of destruction, relocat~ it to the best possible site available and secure it from wind, f'tre, rain and vandals by all reasonable means available within the budgeted amount available.