Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/06/27 - Agenda Packet JUNE 27, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES Agenda 2 - 5 A Development Review DRCDR00-65 6 - 67 B Entertainment Permit DRC2001-00083 68 - 92 C Tentative Tract 16113 93- 152 D Tentative Tract 16114 153 - 212 E Use Determination DRC2001-00191 213 - 222 F Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 01-01 223 - 229 G Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan 230 + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JUNE 27, 2001 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel __ Vice Chairman Macias __ Com. Mannerino__ Com. Stewart Com. Tolstoy__ I1. ANNOUNCEMENTS II1. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-65 HOGLE-IRELAND - A request to construct a 393,880 square foot industrial building on 22.15 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located west of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street - APN: 209-211-30, 31, and a portion of 17. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 00-04 and Development Code Amendment 00-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 00-04 and Development Code Amendment 00-05. B. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2001-00083 - RIPTIDE - A request to allow entertainment consisting of a D. J., dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant with bar and billiard hall in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at 6620 Carnelian Street - APN: 201-811-56, 59, 60, and 61. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUB'I-F16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 17.2 acres of land into 23 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN: 225- 122-06, 49 and 50. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001- 00288. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUB'I-r16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 15 acres of land into 21 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, nor[h of 23rd Street - APN: 225-131-16. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS E. USE DETERMINATION DRC2001-00191 - TOP WEST END, INC. - A request allow a tow service and impound yard in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at 8370 Vineyard Avenue - APN 207-271-51 and 52. F. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A request to initiate an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow the transfer of density and/or open space to non-contiguous pamels when using the Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3). G. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS H. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. Page2 THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2001-00276 (NATIVE BUILDING CORPORATION) AND PRE-A PPLICA TION RE VIE W DRC2001-003909 I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 21, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting Der Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission June 27, 2001 Hillside Banyan 19th/210 3aseline FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Arrow 4th City of Rancho Cucamonga ~1~ CITY HALL ~Etiwanda Specific Plan boundary 'Foothill Boulevard THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND - A request to construct a 393,880 square foot industrial building on 22.15 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located west of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street - APN: 209-211-30, 31 and a portion of 17. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-04 and Development Code Amendment 00-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 00-04 and Development Code Amendment 00-05. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Related Files Backqround: On June 13, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed the General Plan and Development Code Amendments potion of the project, regarding the elimination of 7th Street extension along the north portion of the property to Hermosa Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the portion of 7th Street along the north boundary of the subject site should be abandoned. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin.q: No~h - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 5) South - Vacant and Industrial Buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 5) East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 5) West - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 4) C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South- General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General industrial ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSIOn STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27,2001 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site contains two vacant and adjacent rectangular shaped parcels totaling 22.15 acres. There is no significant vegetation on the site. The site is currently cultivated as a vineyard. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. Vacant industrially designated land surrounds the entire site. E. Parking. Calculations: Number of Number. of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided Building "A" 19,675 1/250 79 Office 374,205 1/1000 (1st 20,000) 20 1/2001 (2nd 20,000) 10 1/4000 (above 40,000) 84 Total 193 231 In addition to the above parking requirements, one semi-trailer parking space is required for eaoh dock-high door. The project is in conformance with this required ratio of truck stalls. ANALYSIS: The proposed building is designed to house a single industrial warehouse tenant (General Motors). The primary building design and 19,675 square foot office portion of the building will front Hermosa Avenue. The loading area is oriented towards the south and faces Hermosa Avenue and staff will condition that the loading area be screened with an 8-foot high solid screen wall. The buildings incorporate two primary building materials and features extensive glazing in the office portions. The office portion of the building is well articulated with strong vertical and horizontal changes and recess to the building plane that are carried throughout and on all side of the buildings. Additionally, the public patio areas are designed to be accessible to the office entryways of the facilities without conflicting with on-site traffic maneuvering areas. The color variation of the building is silver chime, and white, with cavalier blue accent squares, on a primarily concrete tilt-up fa(~ad~. There is also a vertical sandblast concrete element along with blue reflective colored glazing accents to help create contrast. A. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, and Henderson) reviewed the project on February 6, and May 15, 2001, and recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission (Exhibit "E"). B. Technical and Gradinq Review Committee,~' The Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. C. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the initial Study, and found that there could be a significant adverse, environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation. Such impacts would be caused by grading and equipment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the, short-term air quality impact to a less than significant impact. Staff also determined that there PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27,2001 Page 3 might be potential impacts related to traffic congestion. A congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) was prepared to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projection for the adopted land use. The CMP/TI^ concluded that the project will not result in traffic congestion at the study intersections. The mitigation measures for the project require the following improvement: if the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code Amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for the construction of a cul-de-sac terminus for 7th Street west of the railroad spur. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC00-65 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations and Walls Exhibit"C"- Screening Details Exhibit"D"- Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 15, 2001 Exhibit"F" Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions i:- ........... ~ : .......................... [ I I I 40'IBA~S I I -._ ..... , ...... ~UCK YARD Ra~o Raj Company overall site plan HPA, INC. elevatione HPA, INC. elevations HPA, INC. · m~b, Vine, & Ground Cover pale~e HPA INC PRELIMINARY ~NDSCAPE P~N - - ~'~ ,~ ..... ~,~,~-~:,~.,~ -.~ GENE~L MOTORS CO'OPTION ~DUST~AL FACILITY~ = ~ = ~ ~NCHO ~IL COMPANY C~ OF ~NCHO CUC~ONGA- CALIFO~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Doug Fenn May 15, 2001 ii ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND (General Motors Corporation Industrial Facility) - A request to construct a 393,880 square foot industrial building on 22.15 acres of land in General Industrial Distdct (Subarea 5) of the industrial Area Specific Plan, located west of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street - APN: 209~211-30 and 31. Backqround: The project was approved bythe Design Review Committee on February6, 2001, with all issues being resolved at the meeting. However, at the Technical Review Committee meeting, the Engineering Department had a concern regarding the proposed deletion of 7th Street right-of-way. The applicant has meet with the Engineering Department representatives and the Public Works Committee over several meetings to address the initial issue of the deletion of 7th Street fight-of- way. The outcome is that the 7th Street right-of-way could be deleted along with the following changes: a smaller building with enhanced landscaping areas, water features, and decorative entryways with the possibility of a future building to the north of the proposed project.' Desiqn Parameters: The site contains two vacant and adjacent rectangular shaped parcels that total 22.15 acres. A stand of mature Eucalyptus trees along Hermosa Avenue were removed as a result of the City's Capital Improvement program to install a underground storm drain system along Hermosa Avenue. There is no significant vegetation on the site. The site is currently cultivated as a vineyard. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. The vacant industrially designated land surrounds the entire site. The proposed building is designed to house a single industrial warehouse tenant. The primary building design and 19,675 square foot office portion of the building will front Hermosa Avenue. The loading area face is odented towards the south and does face Hermosa Avenue and staff will condition that the loading area be screened with an 8-foot high solid screen wall. The buildings incorporate two pdmary building materials, however, more sandblasted concrete could be used (northeast comer of the building). The office portion of the buildings is well articulated with strong vertical and horizontals changes and recess to the building plane that are carded throughout and on all side of the buildings. Additionally, the public patio areas are designed to be accessible to the office entryways of the facilities without conflicting with on-site traffic maneuvering areas. The color variation of the building is silver chime, white, and cavalier blue accent squares, color scheme on a primarily concrete tilt-up far.~ade. There is also vertical sandblast concrete element along with blue reflective colored glazing accents to help create contrast. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be on the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Provide 360 degree sandblasted concrete along the building, and provide additional spandrel glass similar to the eadier submittal. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide pedestrian plaza screen wall (in addition to the landscaping), minimum 3 feet high, around outdoor employee eating areas. Aa, DRC COMMENTS DR DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND May 15, 2001 Page 2 2. Provide an 8-foot high wrought iron fence along the south property line. 3. Provide details have the wall and/or fencing, and a detail of the water tank and pump house, and should be architecturally compatible with the building. 4. Provide details of the outdoor furniture that will be used in the employees eating areas and gazebo areas. ~: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and shoulCr be ncorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. No exterior downspouts shall be visible from the adjacent right-of-ways. Staff Recommendation: Staff reCommends that the Design Review Committee approve the pro, iect subject to the modifications as reCommend above. .Desiqn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Para Stewart, Larry Henderson Staff Planner: Doug Fenn Applicant addressed all major and seCondary items that where referenced in the staff report and the Design Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM O o,.an oCucam gap, onningOi . n (Part I - Initial Study) (90g) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to pedorm work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Henno~ Dis~ibuti~ C~tez Name & Address of project owner(s): Rancho Rail OD~yt LLC. 1622 Edinger Avenue, Suite G Tustin, CA 92780 Name&Addre$$ofdeveloperorprejectsponsoc. Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 4200 Lath. am Street~ Sui[e 9 Rivers~de~ CA 92501 Contact Person & Address: ~im Bashamt Hoc~le-Irelandt Inc. 4200 Latham Street., Suite B Rivers~de~ CA 92501 Telephone Number: 909-787-9222 Name & Address of person propadng this form (if different from above): Number:. Infon'nafi'on /~d/~ated by aatedsk (') ia not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by sta~.. °1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundadea. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of sign~ficant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (descdbe): West side of Hermosa Avenue, north of 6th Street, and south -of 7th Street AssessoKs Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 4) 209-211'30 & 31 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.):. Site area is 19.25 acres (835,335 square feet) '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proi~osed dedications): I q . 91 ~ c re_s 7) Descdbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: · The project wilt require an Amendment ~.o the~'~irculatio~n Element of the General Plan and a Specific Plan Amendment for the Industr;al Area Specific Plan to have the continuation of 7th Street along the north property line eliminated. Additionally, an application for a Lot Line Adjustment will be submitted. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: The ~roject will require grading, builR~ng, and Develo~-~L Review 'ap~oval. INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 · A~.- Page2 9) Descr~be the physica~ setting ~f the site as it exists bef~m the pr~ject inc~uding inf~~rnati~n ~n t~p~graphy~ s~i~ siabi~ity~ p~ants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Descrfbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, sile all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, b£otic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The existin~ site is vacant land made up of Cc~pact dirt and~sparce ground shrubs. The site is relatively; flat with a slight slope from North to South. There are mature eucalYPtus trees on the site at the ~t of the property line along Hermosa Avenue. No animals, trails, roads, drainage courses, or scenic aspects present at the time of site visit and documentation. There are no existing structures on the ~perty. The site is cuL~letely surrounded by industrial uses and vacant land. 10) De scrfbe the known cultural and/or histodcal aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): No known cultm:al o= histo=ical aspects. 1 I) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Normal traffic alon~ Hermosa Avenue is adjacent to the site and is the current noise source for the project site. iNITSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ' /'~ l '"~ Page3 12) Descdbe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate descdption of the site in terms of ultimaie use which w#1result from the prosed projecL Indicate if there am proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. A~tach additional sheet(s) ff neceasary: See attached Project Description 13) Desc~bethesurr~undingpropertie$~inc~udinginf~nwati~n~np~antsandanima~sandanycu~tura~hist~ca~rscenicaspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear ya~c/, etc.): Immediately north and east of the site is vacant land. To the South and West are multi-tenant industrial ccr~o]~Y~ with a vacant parcel on the southeast c~ of the site. South across 6th Street is the Cabot In~,,~trial ~u~ect and further North is the Biane B~os. Winery. 14) Wi~~ the prop~sed project chan~e the pattem~ ~ca~e ~r chamcter ~f the surr~unding genere~ ~rea ~f the pr~ject? No, the proposed pro~ect will not have a significant im~ ~t on the ~attern, scale, or character of the su~zo,,nd%nq area since it will conform to the Indu~Lzlal Ar.~n Specific Plan desiqn quidelines. INITSTDI.WPD - 4/96 ' A~-~ Page4 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long.tem~ noise to be generated, including source and amounL How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of $ound pmofing are proposed? An increase in noise and vibration resultin9 fr~ construction ~H~ent may be evident durinq the construction ~ha~ of the pro3ect. Lon$ ~ noise will not exist once construction is c~plete. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None of the existing perimeter trees will be removed as a result of this ~ro~ect. Exis~n~ tree l~n~ alnng Hermosa Avenue are anticipated ..to be removed as a result of the City's Capital Improvement proqram to widen the p,hlic right-of-way. 17) Indicateanybodiesofwater(includingdomesticwatersupplie$)intowhichthesitedreins: No bodies of water present on site. ;) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For fu~ther cladfication, please conlact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 1 500 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 3000 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. .... Septic Tank X Sewer. ff septic tanks ara praposed, attach percolation tests, ff discha~rje to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfu~ther cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residenlial (gal/day) b. Commercial/ind. (gal/day/ac) 2000 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of pamel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 ' A~ Page5 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N /A 21) Anticipated range of sale pdces and/or rents: Sale Pdce(s) ~ to $. Rent (per month) $ to 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:, N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL~ INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT~ 25) Desc#be type ~f use(s) and maj~r functi~n(s) ~f c~mmercia~~ industda~ ~r instituti~na~ uses:~ Receivin~ warehousin~r and clistributi~ of ~oods. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: The proposed building will total 456,274 s~,~e feet with approximately 20,000 square feet of that area utilized for office s~ace. The exact office square footage will be detm~m~n~ when the tenant is identified. INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 ' ~ ~ Page6 27) Indicate hours of operation; Proposed project is s~eculative,hours of operation cannot be identified at this time. · 28) Nureberofemployees: Total: N/A Maxireum Shift: N/A Time of Maxireure Shift: N/A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wag~ and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of i~ire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): Speculative buildin9 is proposed. Tenant not identified at this time. 30) Estimation of the nureber of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: N/A ~'31J F~r c~mmercia~ and industda~ uses ~n~y~ indicate the s~uree~ type and am~unt ~f airp~~~uti~n erei$si~ns~ (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Dist#ct, at (818) 572-6283): Em/ssions associated wit_h Lruck and vehlcle ~affic for Ut/s use, ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water~ sewer~ ~rs~ and ~~~d c~ntr~~ agencies serving the pmject been c~ntacted t~ determine their abi~ity t~ pmvide adequate service to the pmposed pmject? If so, please indicate their msponse. The Cucamonga County Water District was contacted and verified water and sewer lines exist to adequately service the site. City Fire and w]ood Control agencies were contacted by phone and gave confirmation that the proposed project could be adequately serviced. INfTSTOI.WPD - 4/96 A~,% Pacle 7 33) In the known history of this property, has them been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials ? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but am not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pes~cides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable tiquids and gases. Also note undergmund storage of any oflhe above. Please list the maledals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the p~operty, as well as the dates of use, if known. No known use or discharge of harzardous and/or toxic materials. The site consists of two vacant parcels. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use. storage or discharge of hazardous and'or toxic matertals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such mate#als to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment araas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No temporary or [ong-term use, storage, or discharge of harzardous and/or toxic materials will occur on the proposed property. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information raquirad for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented am true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucalwonga. ' Date: 09/21/00 Signatu~ /~/~/~J~ Title: .S~o~' ~te 'P~ct Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 00-65, General Plan Amendment 00-04, and Development Code Amendment 00-05 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: A request to amend the Cimulation Element of the General Plan and to amend the Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Area Districts, to eliminate the proposed continuation of 7th Street from its current terminus (east of Archibald) to Hermosa Avenue. In addition, the project also includes the .construction of a new 393,880 square-foot concrete tilt-up industrial building on 22.15 acres of vacant land located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 6th and 7th Street. The proposed warehouse will be used for storage and distribution. Site development will occur in one phase. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Hogle-lreland, Inc. 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 5) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 22.15-acre site is located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 6th and 7th Street. It is bounded on the east by Hermosa Avenue followed by vacant land, on the north by vacant land followed by the Biane Brothers Winery, and on the southeast by vacant land. To the south following 6th Street is a multi-tenant industrial complex (Cabot Industrial project). The site is bordered on the west by an existing railroad spur followed by vacant land and a multi-tenant industrial complex. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Doug Fenn (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamcnga DR 00-65 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is 'Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ~I Land Use and Planning (v') Transportation/Circulation Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Public Services (¢') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (¢') Water (v') Hazards (¢') Aesthetics (v') A/r Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Mandato~/Findings of Significance ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (,") I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1} has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated.' An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: ancy Ferguson ~,~c~ Senior Planner Date: May 15, 2001 /~'~0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact,' "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal'. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (-") vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) established community? Comments: a-d) The proposed project was designed in accordance with the Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Districts, guidelines for development in Subarea 5. The project site is located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue north of 6th Street, which has a General Plan designation of General Industrial. The designation allows for manufacturing and warehousing activities. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no land use impacts will result from the project. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associates to determine potential impacts associated with the elimination of the continuation of 7th Street to Hermosa Avenue. This street right-of-way is on the General Plan Circulation Element map but is currently not improved. The report concluded that the proposed project will not impact intersections in the immediate vicinity. Future traffic will be required to utilize either 6th or 8th Street to continue through to Hermosa Avenue. However, this is not a significant impact as both streets provide appropriate traffic flow-through in the area. A detailed discussion of the Traffic Impact Analysis is included in Section 6 of the Initial Study. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 2. POPULA3]ONANDHOUSIN~ Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) population projections? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information1 Sources: b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) housing? .Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area since there is an exiting pool of construction labor in the region The number of people to .be employed by future tenants is currently unknown. However, 'new employees will not likely create a demand for additional housing as it is anticipated that a majority of the workers to be hired currently reside in the City or surrounding communities. c) The proposed project will be constructed on a total of 22.15 gross acres of vacant land. The development of the project site will not impact existing or planned housing within the area as the site is designated Subarea 5, General Industrial, and is not proposed for residential development. Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: P~.,~/ u,,.. ~ . ~mpa~ 3. GL'uLOC~C ~ Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (¢-) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, includ ng liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (.,.) e) Landslides or mudfiows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (...) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 5 Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 1 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles northwest. These faults are both capable of producing ~ 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to ~ 7.5 earthquakes is 13.5 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M,, 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The project site is not located near a body of water. The Deer Creek Channel, located 1/8 mile east of the site, contains water intermittently, generally during heavy storms and would not present a seiche hazard. e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal and will even-out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the Building Official prior to commencement of grading. f-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga Soboba association. These soils are excessively-drained, readily level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. Runoff is very slow, and hazard of erosion is slight. Included with this soil in mapping are areas of Tujunga gravelly loamy sand in scattered tracts 10 to 20 acres in size. Also included are small areas of Delhi fine sand. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ( ) (v') ( ) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ( ) ( of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of sudace water in any ( ) ( ) ( water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( (,/) of water movements? Initial Study for DR 00-65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 lIssues and SuppOrting InfOrmation sources: f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through intemeption of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ,Comments: a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns as the vacant land will be developed with a large industrial building and related hardscape. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage will make this impact less than significant. b) A small portion of the site, consisting of approximately 140 feet of the eastemmost site boundary is located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure. III-G/2 "Flood Hazards' in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR. The remainder of the site is located outside of the 100-year and 500-year flood zones. The City has adopted standards for flood protection related to minimum building elevations and flood proofing. Drainage and flood protection facilities will be provided for the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The City is designing a storm drain construction project that will eventually eliminate flooding along Hermosa Avenue. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed, prior to issuance of a grading permit. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 7 Issues and Supporting information Sources: ~,o~y Ur~ess Than 5. /UR QUALITY. Would the proposal'. a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (,/) ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) ( cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) Comments: a) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~0) will be generated. Any impact to air quality from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 1. The site shall be treated with water a minimum of twice per day, or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMlo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. This will result in a minimum reduction of 68 percent of PM~o emissions during grading. 2. Hermosa Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. The site access haul road will be watered a minimum of t~vice daily. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. This will result in approximately 3 percent reduction of PM~o emissions. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. Emissions reduction not quantifiable. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5. Vehicle speeds will be restricted to less than 15 miles per hour on unpaved portions of the site. This will reduce PM~0 emissions by 70 percent. To ensure potential air quality impacts from construction and operation of the project are compatible with regional air quality regulations, the project was screened using the URBEMIS7G emissions model. Default values were used where project specific information was unavailable. The project is the construction of a warehouse/distribution facility. The operational mobile source emissions were Initial Study for DR 00-65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 calculated using the projected vehicle types and trips per d ~ study, ay from the project traffic TABLE 1 URBEMISTG Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG ~~ Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. ~ 1.97 1.97 21.82 20.73 21.82 7.6;3 ~ 1.36 1.36 1.92 1.92 3.~ 3.64 0.37 0.37 ~ 2.17 2.17 1.65 1.65 ~ 0.10 0.10 59.62 56.~ .... ~ 437 ~ ~DTh ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ To~Is 69.49 66.41 25.39 24.30 3.~ 3.~ 22.29 8.10 ~nEi res. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 cance No No No No No No ~ TABLE ~ URBE~ISTG Operaaons Emissions Summa~ (Pounds per Day) Source ROG ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~O, CO ~ Mit. Unm~ Mit. Unm~ Mit. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mit. Stat. Soume 0.29 0.29 2.63 2.63 1.74 1.73 0.01 0.01 ource 29.~ 29.~ 33.92 33.92 190.50 190.50 11.42 11.42 · 5.30 5.0 SCAQMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 ~ 150 15~- ~n~i~nce No No No No ~ No ~ No N~ No~ b) There are no sensitNe receptom in the vicini~ of the project site. During construction exhaust emissions from constru~on vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed su~aces may cause NO, and PM~0 levels to exceed dally significant thresholds. The following mitigation measures will ensure impa~s will be at less than significant levels. 1. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. will result in 5 percent reductions of ROG, NO,, and P~0 emissions. Initial Study for DR 00-65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page .q 2. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 4. The contractor will implement ride-share incentives and other programs to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership rate. c-d) The proposed project is to construct a 393,880 square foot concrete tilt-up industrial building, on 22.15 acres of industrial land and provide adequate parking and landscaping in accordance with the City Development Code. The end use of the proposed project, storage and distribution will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~,~ 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (~-) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( .sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or mncompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) (v') ( ) 0 nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-s te or off-site~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) ( f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, b cycle racks)? g) Rail or air traff c impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a) The proposed project is located within the alignment of the future 7th Street from its current terminus to Hermosa Avenue. Currently, 7th Street provides access to local industrial uses and terminates east of Archibald Avenue. The City's General Plan shows 7th Street as a proposed Collector that will extend from its current terminus to Hermosa Avenue. Local access to the project site and surrounding area is now provided via Archibald Avenue, Hermosa Avenue, 8th Street, and 6th Street. Initial Study for DR 00-65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associate~, Inc. to determine potential circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of the 7th Sti'eet extension to Hermosa Avenue. The analysis considered impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions in the year 2020 at the build- out of the General Plan circulation system without the 7th Street extension. ']'he analysis examined evening peak hour levels of service for existing conditions, existing plus project, Year 2020 and Year 2020 plus project conditions for the following intersections: Archibald Avenue/8th Street, Archibald Avenue/6th Street, Hermosa Avenue/Sth Street, and Hermosa Avenue/o"th Street. The analysis indicated that three of the four intersections currently operate at satisfactory Levels of Service (LOS). Minimum acceptable level of service for intersections in city limits is LOS D. The intersection of Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street currently operates at LOS E. Traffic volumes without the project at thiis intersection warrant a traffic signal. With the addition of the proposed project, three of the four intersections would operate with satisfactory levels of service (LOS D or better). With the proposed project, the intersection of Hermosa Avenue/6th Street, would operate at LOS F in the evening peak hour. With installation of a traffic signal, this intersection would operate at LOS B in existing PM peak hour traffic and with proposed project implementation. With the addition of project traffic to the Year 2020 condition and implementation of the traffic signal at Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street, the remaining intersections would operate at satisfactory levels of service. The Traffic Impact Analysis concluded that the project would not create any significant impacts at any of the previously listed intersections. Currently, the. intersection of Hermosa Avenue/6th Street operates at unsatisfactory levels of service. With the exception of this intersection, implementation of the City's General Plan Circulation Plan minus the 7th Street extension, the remaining three intersections will operate at satisfactory levels of service. Examination of the existing development and future traffic conditions indicate that the extension of 7th Street between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue would only serve as access to adjacent industrial uses. Without the extension of 7th Street, traffic to and from future land uses in the area would use 6th or 8th Street for access. Based on the analysis of future year conditions, elimination of the 7th Street extension would not result in any significant impacts to the intersections in the project vicinity. The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation including traffic signals and additional traffic lanes on local roadways. These funds will be used for a City widening project along Hermosa Avenue, which will include installation of the traffic signal at the Hermosa Avenue/6th Street intersection. In addition, the project is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, employee/visitor parking on-site, and large truck access. Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that project-related trips are less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 11 A memo dated Mamh 29, 2001 from LSA to the applicant, indicated that there is an expected decrease in the number of daily trips from what was projected in the December 2000 traffic study. Based on the recent warehousing/distribution trend in development within the project vicinity, an overall reduction in traffic generation has occurred within the project area as distribution land uses as compared to industrial land uses have lower tdp rates. Based on research documented in "Truck Trip Generations Characteristics of Nonresidential Land Uses,' ITE Journal, July 1994, trip rates, commonly referred to as "Fontana rates," were developed by City of Fontana Public Works Department staff. The rate developed for general industrial uses was 3.62 daily tdps per 1,000 square feet. The rate developed for warehousing and distribution facilities was 1.57 daily trips per thousand square feet. Based on these tdp rates, a change of land use from general industrial to warehousing/distribution would result in a decrease in the number of daily trip generated. LSA concluded that not only will the proposed project not have an impact on existing/projected traffic within the area as previously thought, but will actually have less traffic then previously projected and an overall improved condition compared to the December 2000 Traffic Study. b, d) The site is a rectangular pamel with one 50-foot driveway and one 35-foot driveway on Hermosa Avenue. There is an entry set back designed for each driveway to allow for flow through truck traffic and to eliminate the stacking of vehicles into the streets. c) The elimination of 7th Street along the north boundary of this development would compromise the ability of the adjacent property to the north (APN 209-211-17) to be subdivided in the future. Subarea 5 allows a minimum lot size of I acre. The adjacent parcel contains 14.2 acres, but only 300 feet of frontage on Hermosa Avenue. Right-of-way for 7th Street has already been dedicated for a distance of 1,280 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The currently installed segment exceeds the City's 600-foot limitation on cul-de-sac lengths and was designed (Drawing 907) to be extended to Hermosa Avenue. If elimination of the planned street extension is approved, the existing portion of 7th Street shall be retrofitted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Chief. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts will be at less than significant levels. 1. If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for 7th Street west of the railroad spur. e-f) According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the Multi-Purpose trail does not cross at any point within the project area and therefore is not impacted. g) Located 3.0 miles north of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~,,~ u,,,, ~ 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) 0 ( ) (v') eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') Comments: a) The site is not within the Ontado Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower- Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. b-c) The proposed project will be constructed on a total of 22.15 acres of land. The site is vacant with minimal to no native plant species due to either grading or weed abatement activities. A windrow of eucalyptus trees occurs along the east boundary of the site adjacent to Hermosa Avenue. None of the existing trees will be removed as a result of the proposed project. d) There is no dparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) Intermittent industrial development to the south and west of the site has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pu~a~tlaJZy IJniess Tha. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') inefficient manner? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~,~y Ur~ess Tha~l C) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resoume Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resour, ces due to urbanization. Issues and Suppoding Information Soumes: 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing soumes of ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a, c) During a site visit, no evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils were observed. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. No impacts were identified. b) A 50-foot driveway and a 35-foot driveway will provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. Fire hose locations will be approved per Fire Department. All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate turn radius for emergency vehicles. d) No additional impacts related to potential exposure of existing sources of hazardous materials have been identified. No mitigation measures are proposed. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 14 e) The site is located in an industrial area and is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 10. NOISE, Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a-b) With the exception of existing industrial buildings to the west and winery to the north, no sensitive receptors occur within the vicinity of the project site. The proposed site will not produce any'noise not acceptable in the Industrial Area. Noise will be consistent with existing levels in the vicinity, which includes truck traffic and noise from the nearby railroad line. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ T~. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue north of 6th Street in Rancho Cucamonga, and is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately 3.5 mile northeast of the project site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. Police Protection - The proposed project will be constructed on 22.15 acres of land. The area is relatively small and will not increase the patrol area, as most surrounding properties are developed with industrial uses and currently patrolled. Schools - The proposed project will generate new job opportunities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a housing rich community since incorporation. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 15 Development of industrial uses will allow the City to reach a jobs/housing balance by providing jobs for the local population. Jobs created by this and other similar projects will likely draw employees from within the City or surrounding communities; therefore, the effect on school districts will be less than significant. Parks - The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a housing rich community since incorporation. Development of industrial uses will allow the City to reach a jobs/housing balance by providing jobs for the local population. Jobs created by this and other similar projects will likely draw employees from within the City or surrounding communities; therefore, the effect on parks will be less than significant. Public facilities - Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, implementation of the proposed project will not impact existing intersections within the project vicinity. Currently the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street operates at unsatisfactory levels of service; however, this is not attributable to the project. LOS at this intersection curr.ently warrants a traffic signal. The applicant of this project will pay a fair-share of the cost of local road improvements, through the City's Transportation Development Fee. As indicated in the Traffic Analysis, elimination of the 7th Street extension would not result in any significant impacts to the intersections in the project vicinity. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .~,,~ u~ ~ t ~ra~ ~ml~ct ~mpact 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-g) The proposed industrial building will include the construction of a 393,880 square foot concrete tilt-up industrial building on 22.15 acres of vacant land. The facility will utilize existing systems and utilities and therefore will not require new systems or alterations to existing utilities. The appropriate agencies serving the project area were contacted by the applicant and can provide service for the proposed 393,880 square foot industrial building. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 16 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 13, AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/.) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) Comments: a-b) The surrounding area includes vacant and developed land with industrial, light manufacturing, and warehousing. The proposed industrial building will blend with existing surroundings. Landscaping will be in accordance will approved plans and will buffer site activity. In addition, an 8-foot decorative concrete tilt-up screen wall will be installed at the entrance to the truck loading area located on the southeast corner of the site. The wall will obscure public views of the trucks, loading areas and dock doors from Hermosa Avenue. c) Development of the site will create a new light soume as the site is currently vacant. A lighting plan must be approved prior to issuance of building permits. The impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Affect historical or cultural resoumes? ) ( ) ( ) (,~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ) ( ) ( ) (v') which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) No impacts to cultural resources will result from implementation of the project as the, site is vacant and existing development on adjacent land has not revealed the presence of cultural resources. No mitigation measure are proposed or required. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 17 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~.~ u.,m th,. 15, RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks ~s not likely as the proposed warehouse will likely employ local residents. b) The project would not affect existing recreational opportunities as the property surrounding the project area is part' of the Industrial Specific Plan area and is intermediately developed. Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: ~/ u.~. ~ 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 1R Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ..~..~.,y u,,~ T~.. c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) (,,') ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human .beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse impacts to biological resources. The site is currently vacant with minimal to no vegetation and does not .contain appropriate habitat for any listed endangered or threaten species. The site Js outside of the Ontario Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. Likewise, the site does not contain cultural or histodc resources. b) Grading could cause emissions of criteria pollutants above SCAQMD thresholds. Mitigation measures identified in Section 5 of this Initial Study would reduce these to less than signiticant. c) Cumulative effects of the 393,880 square foot industrial building and elimination of the 7th Street extension would not result in any significant impacts to traffic as indicated in the Traffic impact Analysis performed by LSA Associates. The report concluded that existing traffic volumes at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street warrant a traffic signal. The intersection currently operates at LOS D. Impiementation of the project in conjunction with future traffic growth would cause the intersection to operate at LOS F during PM peak hours. A traffic signal is warranted without the project's contribution. Implementation of a traffic signal would bring LOS at the intersection to B. The site plan includes setbacks to prevent stacking in the street, and the applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees established for development within the Industrial Specific Plan Area. Fees are used to make roadway improvements, including traffic signals, within the area to keep the circuJation system at acceptable levels of service. d) Development of the 393,880 square foot industrial building would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentiaJly significant affect to the environment. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-65 Page 19 EARLIER ANALYSES ~ Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamenga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (,/) City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (Certified August 19, 1981 ) (v') City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR (Certified January 4, 1989) (v~) Traffic Impact Analysis - Hermosa Distribution Center, LSA Associates, Inc., December 2000. A3q- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamo~ga DR 00-65 Page 20 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ,. I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised *the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant environmental effects would occur. City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 00-04, Development Code Amendment 00-05, and Development Review 00-65 Public Review Period Closes: June 27, 2001 Project Name: Hermosa Distribution Center Project Applicant: Hogle-lreland Project Location (also see attached map): West side of Hermosa Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets- APN: 209-211-30 and 31 and the southerly portion of 17. Project Description: A request to amend the Cimulation Element of the General Plan and to eliminate the proposed continuation of 7th Street from its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. Additionally the project also includes the construction of a new 393,880 square foot industrial building. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. if adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. June 27, 2001 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELQPMENT REVIEW DRCDR0~65 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 393,880 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL~WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 22.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5), LOCATED WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND NORTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-211 30, 31 AND A PORTION OF 17. A. Recitals. 1. Hogle-lreland Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRCDR00-65 for the development of a 393,880 square foot industrial building on 22.15 acres of land within the General Industrial District. 2. On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on June 27, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of §th Street; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant. The property to the east is Hermosa Avenue and vacant and industrial development. The property to the west is vacant. The property to the south is vacant and developed with industrial users; and c. The application contemplates the construction of one 393,880 square foot industrial warehouse building; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27, 2001 Page 2 a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; an~ b. The design or improvements of the proposed project is consistent with the Development Code, and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and c. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and d. The proposed project is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Plannin,q Division 1) Berms shall be provided along Hermosa Avenue, which undulate and have an average height of 3 feet (maximum slope not to exceed 3.5:1). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27, 2001 Page 3 2) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as vie,~ed from adjacent properties and street. 3) No chain link fencing is permitted. Chain link fence shown on plans along west property line will be replaced with same type of wrought iron pilaster fence that is depicted along the south property line. 4) Provide significant landscaping within landscape setbacks along the street frontages. 5) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for outdoor employee eating areas. 6) Truck parking spaces shall be a minimum of 14 feet wide by 50 feet deep. En.qineedn.q Division 1) If the Planning Commission and ultimately the City Council determine, through the approval process for General Plan Amendment (GPA 00-04) and Development Code Amendment (DCA 00-05), that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a terminus for 7th Street west of the railroad spur to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Chief. 2) Obtain and provide proof of permission from the property(s) owner(s) to the south to grade and remove fill from against the building(s) (see Grading Plan and Section "C"). An alternate solution would be to maintain the existing grade against the building and construct a straight slope to the back of the curb. If the option per current Section "C" is taken, flows along the south property line between the buildings and back of curb need to be conveyed to Hermosa Avenue. 3) Diverting and concentrating off-site flows from the north onto the railroad easement will require approval from the railroad company. An alternative solution would be to accept intedm flows onto the project site and convey them to Hermosa Avenue. 4) The minimum rate of slope for a concentrated flow in a PCC gutter is 0.5 percent. 5) On-site improvements, drive approaches, storm drain, etc., shall join with street grades and street drain laterals at locations and elevations shown on the approved Capital Improvement Project Plans or as-built conditions of the completed project. See Lower Hermosa Strom Drain and Street Widening Phase I, Drawing No. 1735. 6) Hermosa Avenue frontage is currently being widened and improved by a City project in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards. Project all newly completed and other existing facilities including, but PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27, 2001 Page 4 not limited to, curb and gutter, street pavement, and storm drain lines. Protect or replace existing R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs along Hermosa Avenue frontage. Protect and or provide additional traffic striping and signage as required. 7) Construct the following street improvements along Hermosa Avenue frontage including, but no limited to, properbj line adjacent sidewalk, drive approaches, and street trees (see attached Street Tree Requirement Form). Provide additional traffic striping and signage as required. 8) Revise Street Improvement Drawing No. 1735, including all appropriate sheets, to reflect site frontage improvements in the parkway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Show grading, sidewalk, drive approaches, street trees, traffic signage and striping, etc. 9) Hermosa Avenue parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along the entire frontage. Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. 10) A final drainage study shall determine both intedm and ultimate developed flows anticipated across the north property line (as well as site developed flows). Size facilities accordingly. 11) On-site storm drains shall be privately maintained to their connection points on the mainline (existing street junction structures). Pdvate storm drains with sump catch basins shall be designed to handle Q100. Provide secondary ove~ow routes for all sump catch basins. In sump catch basin conditions, the maximum ponding for on-site storm drains at Q100 shall be 12 inches in automobile travel parking areas and 18 inches in truck travel and parking areas. 12) Drainage easement shall be provided in favor of the property to the north. 13) Obtain and provide proof of permission from the Cucamonga County Water District to construct ddveway improvements over their easement. 14) Process a Lot Line Adjustment or obtain an off-site easement for the north drive approach. Either way, an easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided, prior to the issuance of building permits. 15) Obtain an off-site easement to install the portion of the railroad spur through the property to the north of the project site, prior to issuance of building permits. 16) Both the north and south driveways on Hermosa Avenue shall align with drive approaches on the opposite side of the street. These across- the-street ddve approaches are proposed on another project currently being processed through the City, reference project Development Review 01-03. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27,2001 Page 5 Fire Safety Division · 1) This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. 2) Pdor to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. Special Fire Conditions 1) The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet. The minimum inside turn radius is 20 feet. The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet. 2) Amend site access to accommodate Fire Distdct emergency vehicle access. Environmental Mitiqation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Hermosa Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) Vehicle speeds will be restricted to less than 15 miles per hour on unpaved portion of the site. 6) Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-65 - HOGLE-IRELAND June 27, 2001 Page 6 7) The contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel-[5owered equipment where feasible. 8) Grading Plans shall include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) The contractor will implement rife-share incentives and other programs to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle alder ship rate. Traffic 1) if the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code Amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of- way and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for 7th Street west of the railroad spur. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'I-I'EST: L. J. Henderson, Acting Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A% City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 00-04, Development Code Amendment 00-05, and Development Review 00-65 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance: The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Cit~ staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiting the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. ]'he project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until al/mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the, responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:~FINA/.~CEQAWlMP Form-rev,wpd Au q- MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DR 00-65 Applicant: Ho.qle-lreland, Inc. Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meier Date: May 15, 2001 The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent) CP C Review of plans A/C 2 approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Hermosa Avenues shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of plans A/C 2 established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. The site access haul will be watered a minimum of twice daily. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2 25 mph to minimize PMlo emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of plans A/C 2 be applied to a~l inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Vehicle speeds will be restricted to less than 15 miles per hour on CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 unpaved portions of the site. Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on Iow CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 emission factors and high-energy efficiency. All construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 equipment where feasible. Grading plans shall include a statement that work crews will shut off CP B Review of plans C 2~ equipment when not in use. The contractor will implement ride-share incentives and other CP B Review of plans C 2 programs to achieve a 1.5 average vehicle ridership rate. If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said CP B Review of plans C 2 Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for 7~' Street west of the railroad spur. Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval CE - City Engineer or designee -- C - Th rough"~'~"-~ut Construction C- Plan Check ~ 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D * On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating ~ 4 - Stop Work Order FC - Fire Chief or designee ~ 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 - Revoke CUP I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOM M\ENVDOC',D R00~65MM PChklst.doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRCDR00-65 SUBJECT: Industrial Warehouse Building APPLICANT: Hogle-lreland LOCATION: West of Hermosa Avenue north of 6th Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations Project No. DRCDR00-65 C._ompletion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachm, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of ti / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (47?-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding so as not to advemely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Ail ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / including proper illumination. 13. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Building Design 1. Ail roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / / building colors. Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date E, Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts __ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall __ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more __ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 6. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commemial, office, industrial, and multifamily / /__ residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five pement of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 7. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for ! / commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If -- covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. F. Trip Reduction 1. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and single- / /__ family developments of 500 or more units. 2. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. / 3. Shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or / / bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commercial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms Projec[ No._DRCDR00-65 C~ornpletion Date G, Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pecmits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 / / slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover, in addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering / sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Hermosa Avenue 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 13. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear / / feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). sc.o,.,,, ,, A63 Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date H, Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City PJanner in the amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. I, Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:. J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1.Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Hermosa Avenue. K. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc,) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: rc.r & I ,.c I Sido- I B.. I Street I Street I Comm I Median I Bike -.- I Street Name Gutter Pvrr't walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail uther Hermosa Avenue x x x Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. sc.o4.o, , Project No. DRCDR00-6~ C.__om pletion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / adequate detours during construction. Street or line closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with ,! / adopted policy, On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. L. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shaJl be borne by the developer, M. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. N. Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing Utilities as necessary. / _/ Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __/__ __ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / Approval of the fina~ parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. O. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one / parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2.An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: north drive approach. 3.Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: CCWD, MWD. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, {909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Community Facilities Districts 1. This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. Q. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1.Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. 3.Fire District standards require the use of listed and approved fire hydrants on private fire main and hydrant systems. 4.Fire hydrants shall be installed on a 6-inch riser with at least one 4-inch and two 2-1/2-inch outlets. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet minimum standards 5. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 4,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-B, as amended. 6. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 7. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division. Project No. DRCDR00-65 Co.__mpletion Date 8. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be / conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water' District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 9. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan / submitted for review and approval. Include main size. --- --- 10. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, __/ specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground. 11. Required Note: If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance / of the building permit: a.Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system. A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b.For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance. 12. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective / pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucemonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. R. Water Availability 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire __ __/ flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucemonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. S. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire / / sprinkler system. -- 2. Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system requires Fire District approval, and a permit. NO WORK is permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 3. All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an __/ / occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (FP5), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. 5.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire District. 6. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date · T. Fire Access 1. Commercial: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading __/____ permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District emergency access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of e~ery structure on-site. 2. Residential & Commercial: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and __/__ __ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. All proposed fire apparatus tumareunds shall be cleady marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 3. Ail portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within__/____ 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to extedor building openings. 4. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be __/__ __ submitted pdor to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's __/__ approval of the construction of any gate across required Fire District access roadways/driveways. 6. Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system. Vehicle access __/__ __ gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. Additionally for vehicle access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device will be required to open the gate. The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 7. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches __/__ __ from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles. 8. A note shall be placed on all plans which cleady indicates the following: Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from __/__ __ the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access - Fire Lanes" standard. 10. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents sh~ll contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. 11. New buildings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on __/__ __ contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated dudng periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Project No._DRCDR00-65~ Co.__mpletion Dat~ U. Combustible Construction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operation, al before any combustible material is placed on-site. V. Building Use Letter 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for the form. W. Architectural Building Plans 1. Prior to approval of a site development/use permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District. Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal. X. Fire Alarm System 1. An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard. 2.Prior to issuance of a building perrnit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be ! / tested and accepted by the Fire Dist,'Jct. Y. Fees 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga / Fire District as follows:** -- / ~x $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection ~ $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply x $677 (per new building) for New Commemial and industrial Development **Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinkJers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. Z. Hazard Control Permits 1. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described / / below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to llfe or property. b. High piled combustible storage. / / SC-04-01 10 j~ Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date AA. Hazardous Materials ~ 1. Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a / hazardous m~terial in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year. 2. All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated. / 3. Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (11) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, / regardless of amount. 4. Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of / amount. 5. Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the / threshold planning quantity (T.P.Q.). Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355. See Appendix B of this guide for an alphabetical list of EHS's. 6. Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), / also known as SARA Title II1. Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities. There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements. To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202. Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies. Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement; however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory II, submission rather than a certification statement each March 1. Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory. 7. Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR. 8. If the facitity is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. Califemia Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance. 9. Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required te submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner. 10. The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Ptan - New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bemardino County Fire Department. In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs. SC-04-01 11 Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date BB. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances rD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. NOTE: A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a Califomia Registered Professional Civil Engineer. CC. Other Requirements/Comments 1.NOTE: Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire District comments and/or conditions. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: DD. Security Lighting 1.All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. EE. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doom. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doom shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 4.All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. FF.Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. GG. Windows 1.All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. sc 4 1 ,2 Project No. DRCDR00-65 Completion Date 3. Security glazing is recommended on store front windows to resist window smashes and impede __ entry to burglars. 4. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy / evacuation in case of fire. HH, Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be / a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 3. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. 4. All developments shall submit a 8 W' x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant / /__ developments to the Police Department. II. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. AJarrn companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. __1__1 A,b?_ TH E C I T Y OF I~AN C IlO CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Membem of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2001-00083 - RIPTIDE - A request to allow entertainment consisting of a DJ, dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant with bar and billiard hall in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at 6620 Carnelian Street- APN: 201-811-56, 59, 60, and 61. BACKGROUND: In response to a complaint, the Planning Division did a routine check of the ~stablishment in 2000, and confirmed that entertainment activities were taking place on-site without an approved Entertainment Permit. Staff informed the owners of the establishment that they would need an Entertainment Permit to continue such activities. Subsequently, the applicant filed the subject Entertainment Permit. .ANALYSIS: A. ~round: In order to analyze the proposed project, it is important for the Planning Commission to look at the history of the site. The original establishment, The Boar's Head, opened in 1978 (Conditional Use Permit 78-03) as a restaurant with related bar and musical entertainment. From 1982 to 1983, the Conditional Use Permit was modified at least three times. Since then, the establishment was sold to become Stratton's, Sam's Place, and then Riptide. Sam's Place was originally managed under Conditional Use Permit 78-03 conditions for a restaurant with full bar and Entertainment Permit 91-02, which allowed a singer and guitarist. Because of nuisance problems and noncompliance with conditions of approval, those two permits were brought before the Planning Commission and City Council for review between November 1993, and October 1994. At the conclusion of this process on October 5, 1994, the applicant, Mr. Sam Pellegrino, relinquished Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 91-02. The applicant; however, continued his restaurant business, including the serving of beer and wine, which was permitted by right. On April 25, 1995, the applicant expanded his business by taking over the vacant unit to the east of his restaurant and by obtaining a new Conditional Use Permit (CUP 95-07) to operate a billiard hall. A total of 6 coin operated games and 10 pool tables were approved. On December 13, 1995, the applicant requested another Conditional Use Permit (CUP 95-26) to serve hard liquor in conjunction with the existing restaurant and an Entertainment Permit (EP 95-01) consisting of a disc jockey and a live band. Because of the potential problems that had arisen in the past with the bar and adjacent single-family development, the Planning Commission approved staff's recommendation to deny the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit. On February 7, 1996, the applicant appealed the denial of the Conditional ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00083-RIPTIDE June 27,2001 Page 2 Use Permit only to the City Council. On December 13, 1996, the City Council allowed the applicant a full service bar with the condition that the Conditional Use Permit be reviewed in six months. No Entertainment Permit was approved at that time. On September 4, 1996, a six- month review was conducted and staff determined that the applicant was in compliance with all conditions of approval. In March of 1997, the City Planner approved the transfer of Conditional Use Permit 95-26 to Tom Oescher and Craig A. Vercnoke with the understanding that all conditions of approval from the previous bar applied to them with change of ownemhip. The new establishment, Riptide, is a restaurant with a bar and a billiard and amusement arcade only. There is no Entertainment Permit approved for the site at this time. B. General: The applicant is proposing an entertainment permit that would allow a DJ, dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with the existing restaurant and billiard hall. The DJ and dancing is proposed Monday through Sunday from 8:00 p,m. to 12:00 p.m. The acoustical entertainment is proposed Monday through Sunday from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m, The acoustical entertainment is proposed to be one non-amplified instrument and one singer. On occasions an additional person may accompany the singer. The entertainment currently proposed is significantly different from what staff recommended denial of in 1995. In 1995, the applicant proposed a live band Friday through Sunday and a DJ with dancing Monday through Saturday. The hours for entertainment for both were between 9:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Riptide is currently a full service restaurant with bar that serves beer, wine, and liquor. A jukebox provides entertainment nightly. The hours of operation are Monday through Fdday from 2:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. and Saturday and Sunday from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. The applicant is not planning to change the establishment's current hours of operation with approval of the proposed permit. The number of employees that work during business hours is approximately 9. The applicant intends to hire 2 to 3 additional security personnel during peak hours of operation. C. Neighborhood Compatibility: The Commemial Section of the Development Code states that the intent of a neighborhood commercial district is to have uses that are compatible to, and harmonious with, the character of the surrounding residential development. The intent is to implement one of the goals of the General Plan, which is to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. The restaurant with bar is located within a commercial center that consists of a mixture of retail shops, karate studio, hair salon, dental office, another restaurant, bank, cleaners, and office uses. The addition of the proposed Entertainment Permit may, as it has in the past, adversely affec~ surrounding businesses and adjacent residences. In reviewing previously approved Conditional Use Permits and Entertainment Permits for the location, staff has identified a number of nuisance problems associated with the location in the past, such as loud music, noise and loitering activities in the parking lot, etc. Limitations and restrictions can be placed on the business to mitigate, reduce, or help alleviate problems; however, so far the City has experienced an ineffectiveness with conditions placed on the previous permits for the same site. Therefore, staff questions the appropriateness of allowing the Entertainment Permit as proposed because of the proximity of the single-family residential development to the west. However, staff believes that with new management practices that conform with all conditions of approval, and with reasonable hours of operation that include limiting entertainment to no later than 10:00 p.m, Sunday though 'Thursday and 11:00 p.m, on Friday and Saturday, the surrounding business and adjacent residences to the west will not be impacted as a result of the proposed entertainment. The permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission in six months for review of compliance with all conditions of approval. pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00083- RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 Page 3 . D. SecuriW: Riptide currently has 3 security personnel that work at the premise dudng peak business hours (inside building and in parking area). The applicant intends on hiring 2 to 3 additional security guards. One of the new security guards will be a licensed uniform guard that will be stationed near the dance floor consistent with the City's Entertainment Permit ordinance requirement. The Rancho Plaza commercial center itself does not provide secudty personnel. Pomona First Federal Bank has one security guard that is on duty during bank business hours only. E. Crime and Code Enforcement Statistics: Because of the concern over land use compatibility and the establishment's past history, staff requested a list of police calls received in the last year (May 5, 2000 - May 14, 2001 ) from Riptide. There were a total of thirty-two calls for service at this address over the past year. Five of these calls for service were between 8:00 p.m, and 12:00 p.m,, when entertainment is proposed. Nineteen of these calls for service occurred between 12:00 p.m., and 3:00 a.m. (bar closes at 2:00 a.m.). Staff has also put together a list of Code Enforcement complaints since August 1999, including live entertainment without a permit. Attached are the lists of calls and complaints, see (Exhibits "H" and "1"). F. Environmental Assessment: The application is exempt per Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Dally BulletiQ newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Entertainment Permit DRC2001-00083 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:WM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Photos Exhibit "E" - Applicant Letter dated May 8, 2001 Exhibit "F" - Business Description Exhibit "G" - List of Tenants Exhibit "H" - Police Call History Exhibit "1" - List of Code Enfomement Complaints Resolution of Approval .ENTERTAINMENT DRC 2001-00083 PERMIT RIPTIDE BAR 6620 Carnelian Street 30 FWY ~o~c~,~, 480 Feet /~ ~ Location Map N 0 Storage 0 Storage 0 Storage °o 0 0 0 0 0 DJ Table .~ 0 0 Platform 0 C~lerOffi~ Table ~3 0 Proposed Entertainment Riptide's request for an entertainment license is for the purpose of improving profitability and increasing the present customer base. This request, when approved, will be implemented in two ways. The first is a Disc Jockey playing dance music nightly (Monday - Sunday) from 8 p.m. to 12 p.m. Such dancing will be permitted only on the dance floor inside the establishment. The second is to provide acoustic entertainment daily (Monday - Sunday) from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. We are planning for one non-amplified instrument and one singer. (It may be that the singer will accompany himJherself or it may be one singing and one accompanying.) This is intended to provide light entertainment while patrons have a late lunch/early dinner with cocktails. There will be no cover charge at any time during this entertainment. Security Considerations In accordance with the applicable regulations, Riptide will have a duly licensed and uniformed security guard in attendance on the premises at all times dancing is permitted. In addition, Riptide will have their own staff of at least four uniformed security personnel at all exits and entrances and for monitoring the outside premises at all times during such entertainment. I Doug Gorgen approve of the entertainment being requested by Riptide. The application process requires the following additional information. 1. Current & proposed business. Riptide is a full-service bar offering beer, wine, and liquor. Full food service is available throughout the day and early evening. Music is provided nightly by a jukebox. With the approval of this permit, the only change will be in the music which will be provided by a variety of local bands and singing groups. 2. How long has business been in operation As a bar, there has been a business here for about 18 years. The original operation was the "Boar's Head." That was followed by "Stratton's." After they closed, Sam Pellegrino opened "Sam's Place." Riptide, as an entity, opened in March, 1997, with the name being legally changed in August, 1997. 3. Was there a previous permit at the proposed location Talking to patron's who have been here for the past 7 or 8 years, we believe there has never been an live entertainment license, here. Sam Pellegrino, owner of "Sam's Place" applied for a live entertainment license but was unsuccessful. 4. Current days and hours of operation. Riptide is presently open during the following hours: M-F 2 p.m. to 2 a.m. S-S 12 m - 2 a.m. We are not planning to change the hours of operation when the license for live entertainment is approved. 5. Number of employees that are or will be working during non- business hours. We currently have three employees working before opening. There are two cleaning people who work from about 8 a.m. until 11 am. There is'also one manager who works from about 9 a.m. until opening (either 12 m or 2 p.m.) Depending on the night, there are two or three employees working after hours. It usually requires about an hour after hours to clean and close the establishment. 6. The number of employees that will increase as a result of the proposed project. We intend to add 2-3 security people on the late night shifts. We feel the. current number of bartenders, waitresses, and managerial staff will be sufficient. 7. Maximum number of patrons that are allowed on the premises during peak hours of operation; We currently are licensed for 181 patrons. We have, over the past several months been adding secure tables and stools which will increase the capacity. However, we have not yet applied for such a change. 8. Is there currently security for the entire shopping center. No. We provide security each night and the bank has a security guard during business hours. The shopping center, itself, however has no other security. LIST OF TENANTS Rancho Plaza Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 CENTER NAME ADDRESS TYPE OF USE SQ. FOOT HR OF OPE~L~TION TandyCorporation 6612 Carnelian Ave Electronic Store 2100 M-Sat: 9AM-SPM Vacant 6622 Carnelian Ave. 900 Carnelian Family Dentistry 6626 Carnelian Ave. Dentistry 1500 M-TH: 9AM-6PM Fri.: 8AM-1PM Jim Dandy Cleaners 6630 Carnelian Ave. Cleaners 2230 M-F: 7AM-6:30PM Sat: 9AM-SPM Mountain View Inland Pool 6632 Carnelian Ave. Pool Maint. & Supplies 1020 M-Sat: 9AM-SPM Sun: 10AM-3PM Lighthouse Trading Post 6634 Carnelian Ave. Financing Co. 1080 T-Sat: 10AM-SPM Red Dragon Karate 6638 Carnelian Ave. Karate Studio 1200 M-F 12PM-SPM Sat: 8AM-2PM GMAC Property Unlimited 6642 Carnelian Ave. Real Estate 2100 M~F 8:2 Hairtique 6650/6654 Carnelian Ave. Hair Salon 1830 M-Sun: IlAM-7PM Edward Jones 6652 Carnelian Ave. Investment Securities 750 M-F: 8AM-SPM Sat: 12P1VI-3PM Swift Orchids 6658 Carnelian Ave. 1020 T-TH 10AM-6PM F 9AM-6PM Sat: 9AM-SPM Sun: 12P/H-4PM Ritz Camera 6660 Carnelian Ave. Camera & Film Shop 1101 M-F: 9AM.-6PM Sat: 9:30AM-SPM PFF Bank 6644 Carnelian Ave. Bank & Trust M-F 9AM-SPM Sat: 9AM-IPM Jack Restaurant 8678 19t~ Ave. Family Restaurant M-Sun: 6AM-1 IPM CALL HISTORY RIPTIDE From 05/01/2000 Thru 05/14/2001 Dat~ / 'rime initial call typefinal call t~3e incident # location: dispo: repc~t number 05/13/2000 15:36:32 242R ' INC INCIDENT/MISC. LAW ENF CALL RC001340154 6620 CARNELIAN ST ReportTo Fellcw 110004967 05/28/2000 02:02:10 415S , PC.,415 SUBJECT DISTURBANCE RC001490031 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Necessa~j Action Taken 06/17/2000 01:14:48 415F PC415 FIGHT RC001690020 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC t,~---~,¥ Action Taken 06/20/2000 00:04:59 XPAT XPAT EXTRA PATROL RC001720002 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC N,=~=,~ y AcfJ(m Taken 07/08/200001:08:10 CCODES ' CCODES COUNTYCODES RC001900013 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC N.~------,yActi~nTaken 08/06/2000 00:51:44 INC INC INCIDENT/MISC. LAW ENF CALL RC002190014 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC N~'~?y Action Taken 08/24/2000 00:30:34 PEDCK PEDuK PEDESTRIAN CHECK RC002370006 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC An'est 09/20/2000 23:54:48 415F PC647F DRUNK IN PUBLIC RC002640261 6620 CARNELIAN ST Arrest 110010142 10/25/2000 16:49:27 TRUVCC pC488 TRU ~'t= I I Y THEFT REPORT RC002990199 co620 CARNELIAN ST Rep(~t TO Fallow 110011621 11115/200011:57:57 COUNTR ' PC242 ASSAULT RC003210100 6620 CARNELIAN ST Report To Fdlow 110012519 12/22/200001:19:.59 FD PC459 TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT RC003570008 6620 CARNELIAN ST Report To Fdlcw 110013901 01/21/'2001 01:40:12 415 PC415 DISTURBANCE RC0t0210022 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Unl~ 03/03/2001 02:48:56 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC010620040 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC False Alarm 04/13/2001 22:16:16 415S PC647F DRUNK IN PUBLIC RC011030258 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Report To Follow 110104141 04/21/2001 22:45:04 AREACK AREACK AREA CHECK REQUESTED RC011110214 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Cancelled 04/22/200101:54:02 415F PC415 FIGHT RC011120018 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC C-~ On Arflval e:\cedlogs~tegs2000.mdb. Business Detail.business select Page 1 of I Tuesday, May 15, 2001 CODE ENFORCEMENT STATISTICS 8~99 - PRESENT DATE REPORT ACTION 08/04/1999 Report of DJ without entertainment permit Owner states there is no entertainment/DJ plays music only 11/01/1999 Smoking is being allowed in bar Non -smoking letter mailed to owners 11/29/1999 Letter sent from Planning Division regarding resident complaining about nuisance problems 04/18/2000 Business continues to have live. entertainment Determined they are in violation 04/20/2000 Letter sent to owners letting them know they are in violation 04/25/2000 Owners called to say they are in compliance with City 07/11/2000 Graffiti on roof 07/12/2000 Graffiti on roof correction notice 07/28/2000 All graffiti has been removed 08/03/2000 Graffiti on roof 08/08/2000 Graffiti has been removed 08/08/2000 Graffiti is back 08/08/2000 Graffiti has already been removed RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. DRC2001-00083, A REQUEST TO ALLOW ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF A DJ, DANCING, AND LIVE ACOUSTIC ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND BILLIARD HALL, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 201-811-56, 59, 60, AND 61. A. Recitals. 1. Tomas Oeschger of Riptide filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. DRC2001-00083, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 3. On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on June 27, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a commercial shopping center; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is the future Route 210 Freeway, the properties to the south and east are commercial shopping centers, and the property to the west is existing single-family development; and c. The proposed request is to allow entertainment consisting of a DJ, dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant and billiard hall. The hours of operation for the DJ and dancing are Monday through Sunday from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. The proposed hours for the acoustical entertainment are Monday through Sunday from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The current hours of operation for the establishment are Monday through Friday 2:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00083- RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 Page2 d. West of the commercial center are single-family homes. In the past, the hornes have been adversely impacted by nuisance problems associated with the previous restaurant with bar and Entertainment Permit in the same location. The problems included loud music and noise and loitering within the parking lot in the late evening and early morning hours. e. Because of the nuisance problems and noncompliance with conditions of approval by the previous owner, the City conducted a revocation hearing in 1991 and 1994. On October 5, 1994, the previous owner relinquished his Entertainment Permit. f. The City received one complaint in 1997 and one in 1999 from residents concerned about the excess noise as a result of a DJ and dancing at the subject location. g. The nature of the business will have the potential for nuisance problems such as loud music, loud noise, and loitering activities with the parking lot in late evening and early morning hours. These types of nuisance problems could adversely impact the adjacent single-family residences. However, staff believes that if the applicant conforms to all conditions of approval, and with reasonable hours of entertainment, the surrounding business and adjacent residences to the west will not be impacted. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner;, and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent single family residences; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00083- RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) This approval is only for an entertainment permit that would allow a DJ, dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant and billiard hall. Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 2) The days and hours of operation for entertainment shall be limited to DJ and dancing Sunday through Thursday 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Fdday and Saturday 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. The acoustical entertainment is limited to Monday through Sunday from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The acoustical entertainment is limited to one non-amplified instrument and one singer. On occasions an additional person may accompany the singer. Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permit. 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. 4) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building. 5) When entertainment is being conducted, doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 6) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 60 dB during the hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 7) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be for "Fire Exit Only." 8) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to, noise, loitering, parking or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 9) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 10)This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00083- RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 Page 4 11) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed secudty guard from a reputable secudty firm shall be required to be on the premises from 8:00 p.m. until the parking lot is cleared after the conclusion of any entertainment. The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance. 12) This permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission in six months for review of compliance with conditions of approval. 13) The applicant shall post and enforce "employee parking only" in parking area directly adjacent to the residential development to the west. Fire Distdct/BuildinR & Safety Division 1) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairman ATTEST: L. J. Henderson, Acting Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: June 17, 2001 Planning Division CI~ OF RANCHo OUCAMoNGA 10500 Civic Center Drive V. O. Box 807 doff/2 0 2001 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 RECEIVED. PLANNIN~ Subject:Entertainment permit DRC2001-00083 - Riptide The purpose of this letter is to confirm our opposition for the proposed action to allow entertainment consisting of D. J., dancing, and live acoustical entertainment in conjunction with the existing bar and billiard hall. The operation of this type of business adjacent to a residential area just doesn't match what the city says that it would like Rancho Cucamonga to be as a community. Rancho Cucamonga is advertised as a "family values" type city and it is a good place to live. This type of activity is contrary to this goal. Over the years the uncontrolled noise and disturbances caused by the patron activity associated with this business has been very annoying. Although several ideas have been put fourth to mange the noise, and commotion in the parking lot, none have been implemented for any length of time. Most have not been implemented at all. An apparent, if not obvious defiance of the cities attempts to integrate this business into the neighborhood. As homeowners we would like to be able to enjoy the privacy and quiet that one ordinarily expects to have when they buy a home. However, many evenings this it is not possible because of the activities going on in the parking lot during the hours of operation and after closing. This Includes lowed shouting, racing vehicle engines, squealing tires, beer bottles thrown over the wall, are all very disturbing. In the war,ii summer months, considerable activity is carried on with doors open, and patrons acting obnoxious out doors throughout operating hours. Those of us that have to get up early in the morning to start our commute to work every day, would like to be able to get a good night's sleep. This means going to bed early and being able to sleep through the night without the disturbances that are constantly going on in the parking lot. We have made significant investments in our homes and we would like to be able to enloy the full benefits of those investments. Also, we do not wish to suffer a loss of resale value because of the activities of this business. Lets' keep residential areas residential, and keep business areas for businesses. Thank you once again for dealing with this very sensitive matter. 6611 Topaz Alta Loma, Ca 91701 CARNELIAN C~ TOPAZ AMBERWOOD TH E C I T Y OF i~AN CII 0 CUCAFIONGA Staff Report DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Kirt A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 17.2 acres of land into 23 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN: 225-122-06, 49, and 50. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00288. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 1.34 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North- Metropolitan Water District Easement; Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan. South- One single-family home; Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan West- Cucamonga County Water District, Water Treatment Plant; Very Low Residential ' (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per ~cre) North- Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre) East - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) West- Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The 17.2-acre site is currently vacant, and gradually slopes from north to south, at approximately 6 percent. Along the northerly property line is an 85-foot Metropolitan Water District right-of-way land easement, and a single-family home exists to the south. Vacant residential land exists to the east, and the Cucamonga County ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 2 Water District Water Treatment Plant exists to the west. A Community Trail is required along the west property line. There are Eucalyptus windrows throughout the site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The current proposal is for a subdivision only; no home plans ara yet provided. The project complies with the Etiwanda Specific Plan requirement for a minimum lot size of 20,000square feet and a minimum average lot size of 25,000 square l[eet (25,938 square feet average is proposed). The project site is also located within the Equestrian Overlay District and local feeder trail access is proposed to the rear of all lots. B. Desi.qn Review Committee: The Committee members (McNeil, Stewart, and Coleman), reviewed the project on December 5, 2000, and recommended approval (Exhibit "D"). C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on December 6, 2000. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Gradinq Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on December5, and 19, 2000, and January 16, 2001. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on December 13, 2000, and recommended approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval (Exhibit "E"). F. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study has been completed (Exhibit "F"). Staff determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality and biological resources because of tree removal. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality impacts to a less than significant impact, and to require tree replacement. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. It should be noted that a biological resource survey of the site was conducte,r~ in January 2001. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles including the San Diego horned lizard, orange-throated whiptail, and the coastal California gnatcatcher. This site occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the US Soil Conservation Service soils map for the area. Further, there were no indications of remnant nest from previous nesting vertebrate species. Protocol sur~/eys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were negative in that no gnatcatchers were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site. The site does not include occupied habitat. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27,2001 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 161'13 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:KC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Grading Plan Exhibit "D" Design Review Committee Action dated December 5, 2000 Exhibit "E" Trails Review Committee Action dated December 13, 2000 Exhibit "F" Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions ; LOCATION MAP PROJECT SITE TT16113 24TH STREET ,/'X./' City Boundary i ~ ..... [ .......... All Parcels ! .1 ~ Major Streets (centerlines) LU '"':'":'- ..... UJ ~'/ ............. ~> .//? N 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 Mil~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coup/ December 5, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 17.2 acres of land into 23 lots for the purpose of single family home construction in the Estate Residential Distdct (.1-1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the west side of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN: 225-122- 06, 49, and 50. Desi n Parameters: The site is currently vacant and gradually slopes from north to south at approximately 5-6 percent. Along the northerly property line is an 85-foot wide Metropolitan Water District right-of-way. To the south is existing single-family residence. East of the project area is East Avenue, and to the west is vacant land and Metropolitan Water Disthct property. A 20-foot public Community Trail is required along the west project boundary, and 15-foot pdvate local feeder trail easements are required for access to the rear of each lot. No homes are proposed at this time. The project is subject to the Very Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a minimum average lot size of 25,000 square feet. The site contains no hedtage trees or Eucalyptus windrows. .Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Major Issues: The following broad issues will be the focus of the Committee's discussion regarding this project: 1. Restudy lot layout and corral locations. The majodty of lots may be difficult or impossible to build homes on because house footprint would violate Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from corral ai'eas. This includes Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21 (see attached). Second: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 2. Relocate corral area on Lot 21 from within the slope to a fiat area. Policy Issues: The following item is a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-226 requires access ramps from the trail easements to the corral areas. Maximum slope gradient of 5:1 and a minimum 10-foot width. No ramps are shown. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the project be revised and retum to Design Review Committee. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee recommended approval subject to working with trails issues and details with staff. TRAILS AGENDA December 13, 2000 Page 6 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16113- SAKF ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 17.2 acres of land into 23 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Estate Residential Distdct (.1-1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Io~.ated 'on the west sk~e of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN: 225-122-06, 49 and 50. ANALYSIS: The project will construct a public Community Trail (equestrian) end a Class I Bike Path along their frontage and within the MWD pipeline corridor, which is between the subdivision and Wilson Avenue. The project will also construct a striped Class II Bike I~ane on the shoulder of East Avenue. The proposed trail layout includes a local feeder trail to the rear of each lot and a desirable confinuous~loop around the perimeter of the subdivision. The project is located within the Equestrian/Rural Oveday; hence, is required to provide local feeder trails (private equestrian easements)which provide access to the rear of each lot. The average lot size of 25,938 square feet is large enough 'for horse keeping. There are numerous instances in'the proposed tract where the side yard of one lot adjoins the rear yard-of another lot, which creates challenges for horse keeping. Horses cannot be kept any closer than 70 feet from a neighbor's home. There are 15 lots affected. · RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the following issues be addressed: 1. Re-study lot layout and corral locations. Most lots may be difficult or impossible to build homes on because house footprint Would violate Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from COrral areas. This includes Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21 (see Exhibits "A" and "B"). 2. Relocate the corral on Lot 21 from within slope to a fiat area. 3. Provide access ramps to corrals, and show on Grading Plan, with a maximum slope gradient of 5:1 and a minimum 10-foot width per Planning Commission Resolution 88-226. Staff Planner: Kirt Coury, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibits "A" and "B" Corral Location Conflicts ACTION: The applicant presented a revised layout addressing the above referenced issues that was satisfactory to the Committee. The revised' layout identified the corrected trails and corrals issues previously referenced as items 1, 2, and 3. Staff provided a "corral area radius map" shaded to demonstrate how future pad development could accommodate the Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from corral areas on adjacent properties. The Committee was satisfied with the applicant's proposal and recommended .approval of the project subject to the presented modifications and subject to staff review of revised layout. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM c o,R,nc oCucamo , . (Part I - Initial Study) Planning Division (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of. the proposed project so that the City 'may review the project p"muant~i{0 city p~iicies, ordinances and guidelines;, the California Environmental Quality Act; and;the City~'~ Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. Itis important that the information.'requested in this application be provided in full. ' . " INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the msponsibili¢., of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform wc,'x required to provide missing information. Application Number f~r the project to which this form pertains: P~ect Nevada Development Par[ners 7'~-7~'/~/. /~//~ 2625 N. Green Valley Parkway ~275 Name & Address of p~ject owners): Henders'on, NV 89014 Name&Addressofd~.,el~erorp~ect Yianni - Michaelides sponsoc 1205 East 9th Street ~J-47 Upland, CA 91786 Contact Person & Sake Engineers, Inc. (Sam Akbarpour, P.E.~ Address: 400. S. Ramona Ave. Ste. 202 Corona, CA 928'79 I-%PI AI, JNING%FINAI \F£~MS\COUNTER\INITSTDI.WPD 3/00 Page I Name & Address of peraon prepa/fng this fon'n ~f different from above): Telephone Numbec ..... (909) 279-4041; (909) 2'79-2830 fax information indicated by asterisk (°) is not required of non-cor=truction CUP-s unles~ otherwise requested by staf~ '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundades. 2) Provide a set of colo~photogra~hs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3)' Project Location (descdbe): 300' South of w±lson Ave on East Ave. 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessaG'): 225 122-06, 225-122-49, 225-122-50 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 7) Descdbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet · if necessary: No Zone change proposed 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental * agencies in order to fully implement the project: 9)Describe the physical se~'ng of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage coupes, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condiEon) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addison, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological aurveys, traffic studies): E×isting site currently is vacant and site has an approximate slope of 5 - 6% toward south.' Along northerly oroperty line is an 85' wide MWD right of way. And along easterly is East Ave., which is a dirt road and southerly existing dirt road to existing residence and westerly to vacant land. Prelimary soil.~ renort has been completed for this site and geological and archeological survey will be done in the next few weeks. lO)Describe the known cultural and/or histerical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and omi history): To the best of our knowledge there is no historical aspect to this site. h\PLANNINGkFINAL\FORMS~COUNTER~INITSTD1 .WPD 3/00 Page 3 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (airoraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect · proposed uses: No no~se effect. 12)Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequaie description of the site in terms of ultimate uss which will result from the proposed project. Indicate ff there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: With development of 17.2 acres ~nd 23 lots, this project will be in one phase of single· family residents. As a result of this development, portions of East Ave. will De improved and existing water system will be extended to the site for domestic water. 13)Describe the surrounding properties, including info'nation on plants and animals and any cultural, histortcal, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North - MWD Easement South - One single family and vacant ~ _ ~ Av~..~ Dirt Road West - Vacant Land 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding generel area of the project? ~a 2'.-~j~ ~ ~n compliance with Etiwanda specific plan h~PLANNING~FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTD1 .WPD 3/00 Page4 1~ Indica~ ~e ~pe of s~fl~e~ and ~ng4e~ noi~ ~ ~ gene~te~ ~duc~ng s~me ~d amounL How ~11 ~ese no~e ~ve~ · affectadjacentpmpe~esandon-sEeuses. Whatme~sofsoundpmo~gampmposed? Proposed Development consists of 23 lots Which does not generate any significant noise. Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or acenic Eees: ~dica~anybodiesof~r~c~dingdomes~ watersupp#e~ ~towh~hthes~edra~s: Site is currently draining south toward the East Etiwanda Creek and conveyed flow will be dischared to same creek via a storm drain system. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dist#ct at 987-2591. a. Residential (~,~l/day) 6 0 0 Peak use (gal/Day) 1 2 0 0 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal~day~ac) Peak use (gal/rain/ac) 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal.__xx Septic Tank -- Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage esb'mates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987- 2591. a. Residential (gal~day) b. CommerciaJ/Ind. (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20)'Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of paroel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: 23 units, from 32600 s.f. to 20,000 s.f. h\PLANNING\FINAL~FORMS\COUNTER~INITSTD1.WPD 3/00 Pa(~e 5 · Attached (indicate whetherunits are rentalorforsale units): Sale 21)Anticipated cange of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $. to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 4 bedroom to 5 bedroom' 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit t~pe: 4 to 5 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the approprfate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTT~ 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: I:\PLANNING\FINAL~FORMS\COUNTER~INITSTD1.VVPD 3/00 Page 6 · .~.. . 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of Total: employees: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salaty ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessao,): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currenUy reside in the · City: commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of sir pollution emissions. (Data should be ye#fled through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTeJ 32)Have~ewa~csewecfim, andflood~ntmlagenciesse~ing~epmje~beencon~cted~ ~termine~eirability~previde a~a~se~ice~ ~epreposedproje~? ffso, p~ase~dica~ ~e~re~onse. ~ater is available Sewer: septic system Fire: proposed fire system F!~ Etiwanda Creek h~PLANNING~FINAL%FORMS%COUNTER\INITSTDi.VVPD 3/00 Page 7 33 In the known history of this pmpe~y, has them been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? · )Examples of haza~clou$ and/or toxic matedals include, but am not limited to PCB=s; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the rnatedals and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mate/fa/s, including but. not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such mate/fals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. I hereby celery that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informa~on required for adequate evalua#on of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Title: ,~.~,~. Paae 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: TT 16113 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No. 16114 and No. 16115 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map 16113 - The development review of Tentative Tract Map No. 16113, a residential subdivision of 23 single family lots, on approximately 17-acres in the Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue (also known as 24th Street) and East Avenue and approximately 500 feet noah of 23rd Street (APN No. 225-122-06, 49, and 50). 4, Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Sake Engineers, Inc. 400 South Ramona-Avenue, Suite 202 Corona, CA 92879 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. Zoning: Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7, Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located near the southwest corner of Wilson and East Avenues and resembles two, nearly square shapes, slightly off-set north/south from one another by a few hundred feet. The site borders a Metropolitan Water District (MWD) right-of-way easement by Wilson Avenue on the noah. The site is bordered on the south by an area designated Estate Residential District (0.1-1 dwelling units per acre). Scattered residences occur in this area (south of the project site and slightly north of 23rd Street). The area to the north is vacant land. The property to the east following East Avenue is currently vacant and is the subject Tentative Tract Map 16114 which is in process concurrently with this project. The project site is vacant with no existing structures. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: California Department of Fish and Game Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on 'the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (v') Transpo~lation/Circulation (v') Public Services ~1 ( ) Population and Housing (¢') Biological Resources (,") Utilities and Service Systems II ('") Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (,/) Aesthetics ]j(v') Water (,/) Hazards ( )Cultural Resources II(v') Air Quality (,/) Noise (v') Recreation (,/) Mandatory Findings of Si,gnificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (,,') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed.'~(~J~ ~,~ I~ ~lancy ~eygus'o~ ~ Senior P~ject M~n~ger May 25, 2001 ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 PaRe 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P~ent~,y 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (") policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) established community? Comments: a-d) The project site is located near the southwest corner of Wilson and East avenues within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The area is designated Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre). The applicant has proposed a subdivision of approximately 17 acres into 23 single-family lots (1.3 units per acre) with lot sizes averaging approximately 25,938 square feet. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the project. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~0~rn=,.tu,~ 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) (~') population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) (") directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ('") housing? Comments: a-b) The project consists of the subdivision of 17 acres of land into 23 single-family lots designated as Very Low Density Residential (0.1-2 dwelling units per area) located Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 4 immediately west of East Avenue and approximately 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed. Therefore, the project will not result in a change in population projections. The Cucamonga County Water District confirmed they have the ability to provide adequate sewer and water service for the project. c) The project site is currently vacant. Land immediately east of the site is currently vacant and is the site of Tentative Tract Map No. 16114 and No. 16115 other proposed single-family residential subdivisions, land north of Wilson Avenue is vacant, and land south of the site includes scattered single-family residences. No impacts will result, as existing housing will not be displaced. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 3. GEOLOGIC PROBI..I~IS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (-') b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) (~') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) (~') ( ) d) Seiche hazards? (~') e) Landslides or mudflows? ('") f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil (,") conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ("') h) Expansive soils? (~') i) Unique geologic or physical features? ('") Comments: a-b) As part of the Preliminary Soil Investigation performed by SID Geotechnical, Inc. in March 2000, a computer search of all known Quaternary major faults within a 50-mile radius was conducted. Results of the search identified 26 faults occurring within 50 miles of the site. Five of the 26 faults identified occur less than ten miles from the site and include the Cucamonga, Glen Helen/Lytle Creek, San Andreas, San Jose, and Sierra Madre/San Fernando faults. The Cucamonga Fault, located approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the site is capable of producing a maximum credible earthquake (MCE) of 7.0. The California Division of Mines and Geology defines the MCE as the maximum earthquake that appears capable of occurring under the presently-known tectonic framework. The Glen Helen/Lytle Creek fault occurs six miles northeast of the site and has a MCE of 7.0. The San Andreas Fault located nine miles east of the site, has a MCE of 8.0, and the San Jose and Sierra Madre faults, located eight miles north and northwest of the site, have MCEs of 6.7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 5 and 7.3, respectively. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is not located within a City-adopted Special Study Zone; however, the Red Hill Fault located .5 miles to the nodhwest is capable of a MCE of 6.5. c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subject to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude. Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on ground water depths within the area (approximately 200 feet below surface grade), the Preliminary Soils Investigation concluded that the potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely. Adhering to the City grading standards, the Uniform Building Code, and recommendations presented in the Preliminary Soils Investigation will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. The nearest bodies of water are the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) reservoir located approximately one- forth mile southwest of the site and East Etiwanda Creek located approximately three-fourths of a mile northeast of the site. Given the distance and confinement of these water bodies, development of the project site will not expose people or structures to any potential impacts. The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan. e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal. Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. f-h) The General Plan indicates the Tujunga-Soboha soil association for the site which has only slight erosion potential and runoff potential is slow to very slow. Soils are suitable for residential development. Recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soil Investigation, prepared by SID Geotechnical, Inc., will ensure appropriate grading and compaction of the site. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Untess Than 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any (,") water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction (v) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either (,") through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (~') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (~') i) Substantial reduction in the amount of (~') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. The developer will be required to channel the surface runoff from the project to existing storm drains to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant. b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the project site is outside of the 100-year flood plain. c-e) East Etiwanda Creek is located approximately three-fourths of a mile northeast of the site. As a condition of project approval, the applicant must prepare a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed. A final report will be required prior to issuance of grading permits or final map recordation. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUr~iass Tharl 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( (~') ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( (¢') ( ) ( ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 7 issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than C) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (") cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a-b) Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM~0 and NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx. Development of 23 homes represents only a fraction of the total emissions of NOx in the county. Based on Table 6-2 "Screening Table for Operation - Daily Thresholds of Potential Significance for Air Quality" in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the proposed project does not have the potential to exceed the daily emissions significance thresholds. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Sensitive receptors in the area include residences approximately one-eighth of a mile south and an intermediate school located one- fourth of a mile southeast of the site. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~0) will be generated. Any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. b) During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces may cause NO× and PM~0 levels to exceed daily significance thresholds. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high.energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction and grading plans Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 8 include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed project is the subdivision of 17 acres of land into 23 single-family lots, averaging approximately 1.3 units per acre, in accordance with the Etiwan,rla Specific Plan. The end use of the proposed project, Very Low Density Residential (0.1-2 dwelling units per acre), will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,. ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ( ) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) alternative transpodation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a) The proposed subdivision will generate approximately 220 weekday vehicle trips and 435 weekend (Saturday and Sunday) vehicle trips as indicated in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-5-A-1 "Average Trip Generation Rates." East Avenue is unimproved (unpaved) between 23~ Street and Wilson Avenue, and Wilson Avenue is unpaved between Etiwanda and Summit avenues. Development of the proposed project will require improvements to portions of Wilson and East Avenue. The proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area Very Low Density Residential with a Community Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 9 Commercial designation at the southeast corner of Wilson and East Avenues. The project proponent will be required to construct the necessary street improvements and as contained in the conditions of approval for the project, pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. b-d) Access to the site will be provided by a proposed street into the subdivision from East Avenue. The proposed access will allow full access without impeding the through traffic. Access for emergency vehicles will be adequate with all on-site streets to have 50-foot widths. eft) The proposed tract development will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists as adequate points of ingress/egress will be provided and adequate parking will be provided along streets. No bus turnouts are proposed. g) Located approximately seven and a half miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. I Impact Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSs Then 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~) Comments: a) A biological resources survey of the site was conducted in January 2001. This survey was conducted by a biologist walking a series of transects as prescribed by the resource agencies. The primary objective of this survey was to evaluate the site's potential to support special-status wildlife species including the Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Raphiomidas abdominalis terminatus), western burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia hypugea), mountain plover ( Charadrius montanus), and San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvilleO and to gene~-ally evaluate habitat suitability for other potentially occurring sensitive wildlife species based on Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 10 existing conditions. General plant and wildlife species present at the site were identified and recorded to assess the overall habitat value. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles including the San Diego horned lizard, orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hype~thrus) and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Poliptila californica californica). The site occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the LiS Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area. Survey Results The topography of the site is relatively flat, and gravelly, rocky sands characterize the soil. There was a considerable amount of trash and debris scattered across the site. Overall, approximately half the site was covered with vegetation. Veqetation Three primary vegetation communities characterize the site. The 17-acre site includes five to six acres of Riversidian sage scrub interspersed with a number of eucalyptus windrows with ruderal vegetation (weeds). Within the sage scrub area, native California buckwheat was the dominant species. Other species include native California sagebrush, California croton, brittlebrush and a small patch of buckthorn. Non-native species present include brome grasses, mustard, and Jimson weed. Vegetation in this portion of the site averaged 80 percent coverage. The remaining approximately 12 acres is highly disturbed and is characterized by less than 20 percent vegetative cover. The majority of the vegetation in this area of the site consists of non-native brome grasses and mustard. Wildlife Little nesting habitat is available for locally occurring native bird species. The eucalyptus trees provide roosting and limited nesting for locally occurring birds of prey. Wildlife observed on the project site consisted of common birds and rodents as well as red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and American kestrel (Falco sparverius). There was no indications of remnant nest from previous nesting seasons and no evidence that the site is suitable to support any special status vertebrate species. The site does not support open areas consistent with habitats required by the mountain plover. No burrowing owls or evidence of their presence on site were observed or detected during the survey. This species is not known to occur in the project vicinity. The evaluation of on-site habitat for the orange-throated whiptail concluded that there is Iow potential for this species to occur on site. Likewise, habitat conditions on the project site are not conducive to the San Diego horned lizard. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 11 Because the project site suppods five to six acres of scrub habitat, focussed surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were conducted by a biologist holding an individual Section 10(a) Endangered Species Recovery Permit issued by USFVVS. Following USFWS survey protocols for the species a series of six individual surveys were conducted between March 16 and April 30. All potential habitat areas were systematically surveyed along random transects. Calling points for the bird were separated by approximately 50 meters or as needed. No gnatcatchers were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site during the protocol surveys. The site is considered unoccupied. b-c) Eucalyptus windrows occur in a grid-like pattern throughout the site, outside the Riversidian sage scrub area. These are mature and range from ten feet to over 40 feet in height. The trees would be removed by grading and development of the site which requires review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit. As mitigation, windrow replacement is required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan and City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The biologist conducting the surveys in January and May determined that surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Development includes residential development to the east, a park and school to the south, and development of Wilson and East avenues (although unpaved and without infrastructure). Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ( ) ( ) (,") plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ( ) ( ) (,") inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ( ) ( ) (~') mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ- 2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 12 available resources due to urbanization. Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate extractien resource area (Figure IV-2, General Plan). Impacl Potentially Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: Poteniially Unless Than 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) (~') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) (/) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ) ( ) (~') potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ) ( ) (~') brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a/c/d) Based on the current state of the site (vacant with minimal human disturbance), it is not likely that the site has been used for commercial or industrial purposes. The Preliminary Soil Investigation prepared by SID Geotechnical, Inc., indicated that minor amounts of household debris were noted on-site. Given the nature of this waste, it is unlikely it will present a health hazard. b) Improvement of Wilson and East avenues will include appropriate lighting, curbs and sidewalks to ensure standard emergency response times and efficient evacuation of residents in the event of an emergency. Additionally all streets, adjacent and within the proposed development, will have widths of 50 feet to provide adequate emergency-vehicle clearance. e) The site is approximately 50 percent covered by vegetation including sage scrub, and related plants. This vegetation provides fuel for potential wildfires. The Etiwanda area and the entire area north of the City limits are more susceptible to fires than any other area within the City due to the presence of fire-prone vegetation, less convenient access by fire fighting equipment, lack of water service and inadequate water pressure. Development of the proposed project would remove vegetation from the site, improve Wilson and East avenues with paved, 50-foot wide accesses, extend water service and provide adequate fire suppression equipment within the area. These improvements will reduce fire hazards within the area. However, the project is still subject to special wild land/urban hazard conditions due to its proximity to Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 13 undeveloped areas. As a condition of tract map approval, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District will require the preparation of a fuel modification/vegetation management plan for the site. The plan must be approved by the District prior to recordation of the final tract map. Signi§cant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than 10. NOISE- Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ( ) (~') ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ( ) (~') ( ) Comments: a) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered significant as the project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the corresponding land use designation. b) The proposed project is the development of 23 single-family lots immediately west of East Avenue and 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue. The extension of infrastructure and utilities in the area may generate additional residential development north of the project site, increasing travel on Wilson and East Avenues. This additional travel may increase ambient noise levels at the proposed site. However, based on the Very Low Density Residential designation and large lot sizes (averaging 25,938 square feet), future traffic noise in the area is not expected to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this impact is considered less than significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS 'than 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ('/) ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 14 Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The project site is located immediately west of East Avenue and 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is a U.S. Forest Service fire station located on Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Victoria Street, approximately one mile southwest of the site. The US Forest Service is not part of 911 dispatch for fires; however, they will assist the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District upon request, but not usually for structural fires; therefore, the closest fire station that would typically respond would be located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard approximately three miles southwest of the project site. The District is responsible for evaluating the project through the Ciys. Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Police Protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department. The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors. Additional police protection is not required as the addition of 23 single family residential homes will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the project site is small, approximately 17 acres. Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this condition, impacts to the School Districts are considered to be less than significant. Parks - The proposed 23 single family lots will not generate a substantial number of new people to the area. Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, the new residential community will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area as Very Low Density Residential with suspected future traffic after development. The project proponent will be required to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially Ur~leSS Then 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (/) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Comments: a-g) The proposed subdivision will include the development of 23 single-family lots. Development of the lots will require extension of existing utilities available in the immediate area. Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area (school/park and residents located southeast and south of the site, respectively), are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. Waste will be disposed of at the County of San Bernardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. A Drainage Report will be required to address projected storm flows and proposed storm drain construction (see issue 4 above). Drainage Plans must be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for Building Official review and approval. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polenlielly Unless Than 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 16 Comments: a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor. '['he area is designated Very Low Density Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. c) The project will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant. However, the site has been identified as an area to include residences under the Etiwan,da Specific Plan. New light will be typical of a small residential neighborhood and would not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other future residential development in the area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than 14, CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (,,') d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) (,') which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) (,~) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. Additionally, the site is located in a developing area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) Comments: a) The developer of the project will be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval. The impact is not considered significant. City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Page 17 Tentative Tract Map 16113 b) The proposed project will be constructed on vacant land, which is designated Very Low Density Residential. With the exception of the southeast corner of Wilson and East Avenues, designated Community Commercial, the area surrounding the project site is designated residential and is vacant, developed or proposed for development. Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 16. MANDATORY FINDINGs OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) ('") ( ) to achieve shod-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) ('") () are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) (v) ( ) ( environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) A biological resources survey of the site was conducted in January 2001. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles including the San Diego horned lizard, orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperthrus) and the coastal California gnatcatcher Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Page 18 (Poliptila californica californica). The site occurs outside the Delhi sands flower- loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the US Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area. Three primary vegetation communities characterize the 17-acre site including five, to six acres of Riversidian sage scrub interspersed with a number of eucalyptus windrows with ruderal vegetation (weeds). Within the sage scrub area, native California buckwheat was the dominant species. Other species include native Califomia sagebrush, California croton, brittlebrush and a small patch of buckthorn. Non-native species present include brome grasses, mustard, and Jimson weed. Vegetation in this portion of the site averaged 80 percent coverage. The remaining approximately 12 acres is highly disturbed and is characterized by less than 20 percent vegetative cover. The majority of the vegetation in this area of the site consists of non-native brome grasses and mustard. Little nesting habitat is available for locally occurring native bird species. The eucalyptus trees provide roosting and limited nesting for locally occurring birds of prey. Wildlife observed on the project site consisted of common birds and rodents as well as red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and American kestrel (Faico sparverius). There was no indications of remnant nest from previous nesting seasons and no evidence that the site is suitable to support any special status vedebrate species. Protocol surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were negative in that no gnatcatchers were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site. The site does not include occupied habitat. The site does not suppod open areas consistent with habitats required by the mountain plover. No burrowing owls or evidence of their presence on site were observed or detected during the survey. This species is not known to occur in the project vicinity. The evaluation of on-site habitat for the orange-throated whiptail concluded that there is Iow potential for this species to occur on site. Likewise, habitat conditions on the project site are not conducive to the San Diego horned lizard. b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality with development of the project site. The shod-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activities. However, the impacts will cease once construction activities are completed. Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant. c) Cumulative effects of residential development in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area were identified in a previous environmental document (see Earlier Analysis section below). Appropriate analysis and mitigation measures were developed prior to the implementation of the Specific Plan. No additional mitigation measures beyond those presented in the Specific Plan and this Initial Study are required. d ) Development of 23 single-family lots would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce impacts to less than significant. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and will cease once construction activities are completed. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16113 Pa,qe 19 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FRO.M FAX NO. : 17026551781 3u~. la 2~01 09:39AM P3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16~ 13 Page 20 EARLIER ANALYSES ~arlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program I:IR, or other GI:QA process, one or more e~eets have been adequately analyzed in an earlier E~R or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c){3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following eadler document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are availabie for review in the City of Rancho CuCamcmga, Planning Division offices. 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): Etiwanda Spe~3ific Plan EIR (Cen ed 9e3) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR - City'of Rancho Cu~amonga (Certified January 4, 1989) (,~) General Plan EIR- City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certir~-~l January 4, 1981) Archeslogical Study Summary of Results of Focussed USFW8 Protocol Surveys for Coastal California Gnatcatcher on Traof Numbers 16113 and 16114, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Beman:lino County, Califomle, May 17, 2001, (v') Results of a Special Status WildFire Species Habitat Based Evaluation cm Tract Numbers 16113 and 16114, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, January 15. 2001. APPLICR.N~. CERTIFICATION, I CERI ~t- Y TJ-LA.T I A.M ~ I -~'F_. APPLICANT FOR TI.iE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN' THIS IN! STLrD¥. I ACKNOWLI ~]E TI.IRT I I. LA_VE READ TI-IIS INITIAL STLrDy ,aND THE PROlaOSED MJTJOATION M.~J~Uk ELS. ~Fl..1~ I I-'].~V~ R.~VI~F~) ~ PROJF, C~ PLANS OR PROPOSAL8 AND/OR I [ERF_~¥ AGREE TO ~ PROI:'OSLJD Mn ~OATION _ME, ASURES TO AVOID THE 151"F£C'I~ OR MITIOATE TI"IE I~F.e-.e.;CI'S TO A POINT WI-IER.E ~¥ NO SIONIFICANT ENVIRO NMIgNTAL E~'F~CTS WOULD OCCUR.. PrlntNamea~lTitle: ~0~ ~x-'F~-tO j /~Pf'~-~c/W'7- ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The foflowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tenta~e Tract SUBTT16113 Public Review Period Closes: June 27, 2001 Project Name: Project Applicant: Sake Engineers, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN: 225-122-06, 49 and 50. Related tie: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00288. Project Description: TENTATiVETRACTSUBTT16113-SAKEENGINEERING-Arequesttosubdivide17.2 acres of land into 23 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avo'~] the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. if adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The preject file and all related documents am available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. June 27 2001 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16113, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 23 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 17.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, 300 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-122-06, 49, AND 50. A. Recitals. 1. Sake Engineering filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 16113, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on June 27, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to property located on the west side of East Avenue with a street frontage of approximately 432 feet on East Avenue and a lot depth of 1,280 feet and is presently vacant; and b) The property to the north of the subject site is a vacant Metropolitan Water District Easement, the property to the south is predominately vacant with one single-family home, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is the Cucamonga County Water District, Water Treatment Plant; and c) The project is designed in conformance with the Very Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d) The site contains several large Eucalyptus windrows, which will be removed and replaced with new Eucalyptus windrows in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan windrow preservation requirements; and e) The design of the project, including roadway alignment, trails, and grading will provide efficient use of land to accommodate single-family homes. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b) The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e) The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired bythe public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study preparad therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; furthermore, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b) Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources, or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California code of Regulations. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below, and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ~Plannin.q Division: 1) Provide a concrete textured finish at all mid-block trail crossings. 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00288 is hereby approved subject to tree replacement. 3) The developer shall construct gated local feeder trail entrances consistent with the "Feeder Trail 20-foot to 15-foot Transition: Vehicle Gate with Side Access" Standard Drawing 1006-B. En ineen'n Division: 1) Wilson Avenue shall be improved as follows: a) Between the east and west tract boundaries, the south one-half of the road, shall be fully improved in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" (88-foot right-of-way) standards and Figure 5-32 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The north one-half of the road shall be 18 feet of pavement. Median island breaks will not be allowed on Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. Developer shall pay a fee for future median landscaping. Final signing and stdping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. b) Wilson Avenue from the eastefiy tract boundary to East Avenue shall be constructed with the median island curbs and 18 feet of pavement on both sides of the median. Fee credit will be given for the curbs, 14 feet of pavement on each side of the median, and the East Avenue/Wilson Avenue intersection. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off-site improvements other than the "backbone" portion from future development to the east. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, ail fights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. c) Wilson Avenue from the westerly tract boundary to Etiwanda Avenue to be 36 feet of pavement. Final signing and striping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. Fee credit shall be given for the ultimate permanent portions (14 feet north and south of the ultimate median). d) A County permit shall be required for improvements outside the City limits. If the County does not agree to issue a permit, developer shall furnish 36-foot width of improvements with no medians all within the City limits. The developer shall construct PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 4 the ultimate curbs and gutters on the south side along the whole length of the project's frontage. The developer will also pay a fee for the cost of future construction and landscaping of the median. 2) East Avenue shall be improved as follows: a) The west one-half of East Avenue shall be improved full width, in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" (88-foot right-of-way) standards and Figure 5-28 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, between the north and south tract boundaries fronting East Avenue. The east one-half of said East Avenue to be 18 feet of pavement. Final signing and striping to be determined bythe City Traffic Engineer. b) East Avenue from the northerly tract boundary to Wilson Avenue and from the southerly tract boundary to Summit Avenue to be 36 feet of pavement. Final signing and stdping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. Provide AC berm as needed to control drainage. No Fee credit and reimbursement will be given for the full amount of the 26 feet. c) The East Avenue/Wilson Avenue intersection including curb returns along with the portion crossing Metropolitan Water Distdct is eligible for fee credits. d) Provide a continuous all weather surface walking path on the west side of East Avenue from Summit to Wilson Avenues. 3) .The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs ~n excess of, the required Transportation Development Fee for permanent "backbone" improvements on Wilson and East Avenues and across the Metropolitan Water District property, in conformance with City policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off-site improvements other than the "backbone" portion from future development of adjacent properties. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Provide R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs along the Wilson and East Avenue frontages and provide additional traffic stdping and signage, as required. 5) All internal streets to be improved to City "Local Residential Street" (36~foot curb-to-curb) standards. All 50-foot rights-of-way, per Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-15, are acceptable. Provide a 5-foot sidewalk easement on one side of the street. 6) Future driveways on comer lots shall be located the maximum distance allowed by the lot size from the intersection's "beginning of curb return" ¢__ %© PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 5 (BCR), to minimize conflicts between vehicles turning right and those backing out of driveways. 7) In addition to hydrology and hydraulics for storm drains, the final drainage report shall address the need to provide flood protection walls and other measures at the northerly boundary for the possibility of runoff or breakout from the existing Wilson Avenue dirt swale. The Summit School Floor Prevention Plan, on file in the office of the City Engineer, noted the breakout issue and it shall be addressed with this project. Off-site flows diverted by said facilities shall not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. Environmental Miti,qation: Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upontimeofyearofconstruction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment wilt be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not in use. Bioloqical Resources 1) Existing Eucalyptus windrows shall be preserved or replaced per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: L. J. Henderson, Acting Secretary I, Bred Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16113 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1'. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appr°priate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff,s is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no'further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits. I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CEQA~MMp FORM.WPD MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TT 16113, Applicant: SAKE ENGINEERING Initial Study Prepared by: Nancy Fer.quson Date: MAY 25, 2001 The site shall be treated with water or other soil CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. Contractor shall select the construction equipment CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high- energy efficiency. All construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel CP C Review of plans. A/C 2 powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that CP/CE B Review of plans. C work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2 Windrows removed to accommodate the project shall CP C As necessary C/A be replaced with new windrows of equivalent linear 2,3,4 footage. Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-s[ta Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - P~ior To Construction -- B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee ~hout Construction C - Plan Check ~ 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating FC - Fire Chief or designee ~ 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 - Revoke CUP H:~ENV~T~'16113.MMCHKLST.DOC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Tentative Tract Map 16113 SUBJECT: 23 Lot Subdivision APPLICANT: Sake Engineering LOCATION: West side of East Avenue, 300 feet south of Wilson Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Project No. SUBTT16113 Com;)lefion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with / / all receptacles shielded from public view. 8. Ail ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry wails, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 10. Ail building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / including proper illumination. 11. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch Iodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement; however developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. c. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d.Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. e. For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. SC-04-01 2 ~, ~.-~(~ Project No.~UBTT16113 .Completion Date 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 14. Six-foot decorative block wails shall be constructed along the interior boundary/residential side of the identified local feeder trail and include a minimum 10-foot equestrian access gate. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, ail contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 15. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Y~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 16. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 17.Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 18. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. D, Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. fi. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. fi. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Project No. SUBTT16113 Completion Date 5. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously / maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). E. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. F, Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Project No. SUBTT16113 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: --/-- -- a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f, Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 4,Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e,, SUBTT16113). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3.Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tractJparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. Project No. SUBTT16113 Comolet~on Date 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written cedification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5.Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of '8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). 2. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in ------ ', substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be praparad by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /__ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: '~' K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from __/__ street centerline): 51 total feet on Wilson Avenue / 44 total feet on East Avenue 25 total feet on "Local" Streets / 2. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / 3. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for / approved openings: Wilson and East Avenues. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / noted on the final map. SC-04-01 6 C ~) ~ Project No. SUB'I-r 16113 Completion Date 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be / dedicated to the City. 7. ~The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests __ necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. L. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped ____ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: ! Street Name Curb & A.C S de- DHve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other iGatterl Pvmt i walk [Appr. lLlghts[Trees[ Trail [ Island ITrailI Wilson Avenue x x x x x x x X East Avenue x x x x x I Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights// on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction __/__/__ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and __/ /__ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. sc 4 , 7 C_ Project No. SUBTT16113 Completion Date d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and intemonnect wiring. Pull boxes shaJl be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: East Avenue parkways and Wilson Avenue median and parkway including Community Trail. 2.Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City. 5.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan East and Wilson Avenues; Etiwanda Specific Plan. Project No. SUB3-1'16113 Corneletion Date N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone "D" designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4.Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 5. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 6.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 7.Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: San Bemardino County Flood Control District/School District/City, as applicable. 3. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to buJlding permit issuance if no map is involved. Project No, SUB'I-r16113 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Community Facilities Districts 1. This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. R. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. 3. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 1,750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-B, as amended. 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 5. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. 6. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. S. Water Availability 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. T. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. U. Fire Access 1. Residential: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes. Ail roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards. 2. Residential & Commercial: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire Disthct in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and l0 Project No. SUBTT16113 Completion Date indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. All proposed fire apparatus tumareunds shall be dearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain previsions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 3. The minimum width for a Fire District access read or fire lane is 26 feet. The minimum inside turn __/__ __ radius is 20 feet. The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet. 4. Ail portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within / 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved mute around the exterior of the building. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access read to exterior building openings. 5. A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following: Emergency access, a / minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards. 6. Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire District standards. Dead-end roadways / shall not exceed 600 feet in length. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval fi-om ! the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access - Fire Lanes" standard. 8. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance / with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. 9. New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. / V. Hazard Notification - Fire (State Law) 1. For projects located in the State Responsibility Areas (SPA), or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) known as the "Special Fire Protection Area" by the Fire District State Law requires notification. Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall place a note on the map stating the project is located within the State Responsibility Area or the "Special Fire Protection Area," as appropriate, due to wildland exposure. The note is subject to the approval of the Fire District and is based on SRA/VHFHSZ maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2. Special Fire Protection Area Development: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant __/__ __ shall meet all requirements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fire Hazard Sevedty Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SPA). This may include increased street widths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire sprinklers, etc., contained in the Fire Safety Oveday District Standards. SC-04-01 11 ~ ~1'"~ Project No. SUBTT16113 Completion Date W. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for all Maps and Plans) 1. This project is located in a designated high fire hazard area based on proximity to or exposure urban wildland interface. Mitigation measures are required. 2.Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. 3. Prior to the issuance of any precise grading permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to final on-site inspection. 5. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/h~;,~rd reduction plan shall be installed. The Fire District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas. Further, the installed fuel modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District. The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subject to (annual) triennial inspections. 6. Phased projects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District. X. Combustible Construction Letter 1. Required Note: Pdor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. Y. Fees 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucemonga Fire District as follows:** x $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection X $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) "Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. Z. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electhcal and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. NOTE: A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for Project No. SUB3-1'16113 Completion Date existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer. AA. Other Requirements/Comments 1. NOTE: Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire District comments and/or conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-69 SUBTT16113 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 5 (BCR), to minimize conflicts between vehicles turning right and those backing out of driveways. 7) In addition to hydrology and hydraulics for storm drains, the final drainage report shall address the need to provide flood protection walls and other measures at the northerly boundary for the possibility of runoff or breakout from the existing Wilson Avenue dirt swale. The Summit School Floor Prevention Plan, on file in the office of the City Engineer, noted the breakout issue and it shall be addressed with this project. Off-site flows diverted by said facilities shall not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 8) Street "D" stub to the south shall be designed to be the beginning of a cul-de-sac starting approximately 60 feet north of the south tract boundary or as approved by the City - ~ Engineer. Environmental Miti.qation: Air C~uality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMm emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not in use. Biological Resources 1) Existing Eucalyptus windrows shall be preserved or replaced per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. C Y/ THE CITY OF I~AN C Il 0 CIJCA~ONGA StaffRepo DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Kid A. Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 15 acres of land into 21 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential Distdct (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, north of 23rd Street - APN: 225-130-16. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Proiect Density: 1.4 dwelling units per acre. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Neighborhood Commercial, and Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Etiwanda Creek Park, Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Open Space, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan General Plan Desi.qnations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial and Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Park East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) Site Characteristics: The 15-acre site is currently vacant, and gradually slopes from the north to south, at approximately 5 to 6 percent. The project site is surrounded by vacant land to the north, east, and west. South of the site is the existing Etiwanda Creek Park. A Community Trail is ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27,2001 Page 2 required along the east property line. Local feeder trails are required for access to the rear of each lot. ANALYSIS: General: The current proposal is for a subdivision only, no home plans are yet provided. The Etiwanda Specific Plan requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and a minimum average lot size of 25,000 square feet (25,515 square feet average is proposed). The project site is also located within the Equestrian Overlay District. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee members (McNeil, Stewart, and Coleman), reviewed the project on December 5, 2000, and recommended approval. Action comments have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit "D"). Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on December 6, 2000. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. Gradinq Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on December 5 and 19, 2000, and January 16, 2001. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on December 13, 2000, and recommended approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval (Exhibit "E"). Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study has been completed (Exhibit "F"). Staff determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality levels dudng site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality impacts to a less than significant impact. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. A biological resources survey of the site was conducted in January 2001. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles, including the San Diego homed lizard, orange-throated whiptail, and the coastal California gnatcatcher. This site occurs outside the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the U.S. Soil Conservation Service soils map for the area. Further, no gnatcatchers or other endangered or sensitive species were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site during the protocol surveys. Therefore, no further consideration of biological resources is required. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 3-1'16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission a~)prove Tentative Tract 16114 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitt.e~d Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map · Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Design Review Action dated December 5, 2000 Exhibit "E" - Trails Review Action dated December 13, 2000 Exhibit "F" - Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16114 Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Tract 16114 LOCATION MAP 24TH STREET ~ TT16114 ::::~ i ] All Parcels ~ i I ~V Major Streets (centerlines) , ', ...,:. ~ ... N 0.3 0.6 0.9 Miles DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury December 5, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 15 acres of land into 21 lots for the purpose of single family'home construction in the Estate Residential District (.1-1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the east side of East Avenue, north of 23rd Street - APN: 225-131-16. Desiqn Parameters: The site is currently vacant and gradually slopes from north to south at approximately 5-6 percent. Along the north and east property lines is vacant/undeveloped land. To the south is Park. West of the project area is East Avenue. A 20-foot public Community Trail is required along the east project boundary, and 15-foot pdvate local feeder trail easements are required for access to the rear of each lot. No homes are proposed at this time. The project is subject to the Very Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a minimum average lot size of 25,000 square feet. The site contains no hedtage trees or Eucalyptus windrows. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be the focus of the Committee's discussion regarding this project: 1. Study lot layout and corral locations. Some lots may be difficult or impossible to build homes on because house footprint would violate Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from corral areas. This includes Lots 1,2, 4, 6, and 10 (see attached). 2. The developer is proposing an Alternate Lot Configuration at the north end of "B" Street as shown on Grading Plan. Staff does not support this concept because it does not provide secondary access for this tract or for future residential development to the north. Policy Issues: The following item is a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-226 requires access ramps from the trail easements to the corral areas. Maximum slope gradient of 5:1 and a minimum 10-foot width. No ramps are shown. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the project be revised and retum to Design Review Committee. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Para Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee recommended approval subject to working the trails issues and details with staff. TRAILS AGENDA· " - December 13, 2000 Page 7 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16114- SAKI- ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 15 acres of land into 21 lots for the purpose of single-fami y home construction in the Estate Residential District (. 1-1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, north of23rd Street-APN: 225-131-16. .ANALYSIS: The project is bounded to the south by Etiwanda Creek Park and flood control land to the east. The project will construct a public Community Trail .(equestrian) along the r easterly boundaryand a stdped Class II Bike Lane on the shoulder of East Avenue: The proposed trail layout includes a local feeder trail to the rear of each lot and a desirable continuous loop around the perimeter of the subdivision. The project is located within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay; hence, is required to provide local feeder trails (private equestrian easements) which provide access to the rear of each lot. The average lot size of 25,523 square feet is large enough for horae keeping. There are numerous instances in the proposed tract where the side yard of one lot adjoins the rear yard of another lot, Which creates challenges for horae keeping. Horees cannot be kept any closer than 70 feet from a neighbor's home. There are five lots affected. The applicant proposes a combination emergency access road and local feeder trail along the northerly tract boundary because two points of access are required for the subdivision. The Fire Protection District and Planning Division staff has indicated that such a joint use is not feasible, pdmadly because of the pavement, which is unsuitable for horaes. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the following issues be addressed: 1. Re-study lot layout and corral locations. Some lots may be difficult or impossible to build homes on because house footprint would violate Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from corral areas. This includes Lots 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10 (see Exhibit "A,). 2. Relocate fire emergency access road to avoid shared use with equestrian 3. Provide, and show on Grading Plan, access ramps to cerrals with'a maximum slope gradient of 5:1 and a minimum 10-foot width per Planning Commission Resolution 88-226. Staff Planner: Kirt Coury, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Corral Location Conflicts ACTION: The applicant presented a revised layout addressing the above referenced issues that was satisfactory to the Committee. The revised layout identified the corrected trails and corrals issues previously referenced asitems 1, TRAILS AGENDA '- December 13, 2000 ' Page 8 2, and 3. staff provided a "corral area radius map" shaded to demonstrate how future pad development could accommodate the Development Code requirement of a 70-foot setback from corral areas on adjacent properties. Staff further identified that the project'was conditioned by the Fire Divisior~ to ~prinkler future buildings in lieu of the proposed emergency access road along the north property line. The Committee was satisfied with the applicant's proposal and recommended approval of the project subject to the presented modifications and subject to staff review of revised layout. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Cl o,R.n oC co. g (Part I - Initial Study) Planning Division ~ (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform· the City' of the basic components of:the proposed project so that the City may review the project pu~ua'rit to Ci~:policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California EnvirOnmentaI QUality A~t; and theCity~ Rules andProcedures to Implement CEQA. It is important fhat t~: informlati0n requestedin this'application be 3rovided in full. i= INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibilfty of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be avaaable to perZon'n work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this fonm pertains: Project Nevada Development Partners 7'TZ'~.,,~. Title: --'" ",~ 2625 N. Green Valley Parkway #275 Name & Address of project owner(s).- Henderson, NV 89014 Name & Address of developer orproject Yianni Michelides sponsor' 1205 East 9th Street #J-47 Upland, CA 91786 ContactPe~on& SaKe Engineers Inc. (Sam Akbarpour) Address: 400 S. Ramona Ave. #202 Corona, CA 92879 (909) 279-4041 Fax: (909) 279-2830 Name & Address of per, on preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number: Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff · 1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundades. 2) Provide a set of colorphotographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the prmary access points which se~e-e the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each. photograph. 3) Project Location (descrbe): BOO' South of Wilson Ave. on East Ave. 4) ASSeSSorEs Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 2 2 5 1 3 O- 1 6 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: No zone change proposed· 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessa/y from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project; ~De$cdbe He phys~al se~hg of He $~ as # exits be~m He prnje~ ~uding ~rma~n on t~mphy, $o# stabile, plan~ and an~a~, matu~ tme~ ~ and ma~ d~age coupes, and s~nic aspens. Desc#~ a~ ex~g st~cturos on s~e · ~uding age and ~nditio~ and he use of ~e s~um$. A~ photogmph$ of s~n~nt ~a~ms described. ~ add~on, s~ afl sources of ~n'na~n ~.e., geological an~or hydrn~gic studie~ b~c and arnheol~al $u~eys, traffic stu~e~: Existing site currently ~s vacant~ and has an approximate slope of 5-6% towards south; there is no trails or drainage courses throughout the site. Alon9 the Northerly property isa vacant lot; Easterly - vacant land~ Westerly - East Ave.; Southerly - Dirt Rd. & 23rd St. Preliminary soils report has be~n done for the project, and Geological and Archeological survey will be done in the next few weeks. 1~ Desc~e He ~own c~uml an~or h~al as~ct$ of ~e s~e. Site afl sources of ~afion ~k$, pub~hed mpo~ and omi h~: To the best of our knowledge, there is no historical aspects to ~his site. I:\PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTF:~,U~J~T~'rr-,-~ ~^~Dr~ ~,n~ 11)Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (ai~raft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: No noise e~fect. 12) Descdbe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate descdption of the site in terms of ul§mate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there am proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: With development of 15 AC~ and 21 lots, this project will .be in one phase of Sinqle Family Resident, a-d as a result of this development, portions of East Ave. & 23rd. St. will be improved and the existing water system will be extended to the site for domestic water. 13)Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North - Vacant South - 23rd Street East - Vacant West - East Avenue 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? Proposed project is in compliance with Etiwanda Specific Plan. h\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTD1 VVP~ ~/,'3n l~lndicate~etype °fsh°~te~and~ng'~no~to~genem~cludingsoumeanda~-nount. How~ll~ese ~e~ve~ a~ctadjacentpropediesandon-siteuses. Wi~atme~odsofaoundproo~gampmposed? Proposed development consists of 21 lots, which does not generate any significant noise. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: l~dica~a~b~iesofwater~cludingdomes§cwa~rsupplie~intowhich~esitedrei~: ~he site ~s currently draining south toward the east Et~wanda Creek~ and conveyed flow will be discharged to the same creek via storm drain system. 18)Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucarnonga Counh/ Water District at 987-2591. a. Residenb~l (gal/day) 6 0 0 Peak use (gal/Day), 1 2 0 0 b. Commemial/lnd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/rain/ac) _, 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. X Septic Tank Sewer. ff ~eptic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitaG, sewage system is proposed indic'-------ate expecte~ daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucaroor~ga County Water Dist#ct at 987- 2591. a. Residential (gal/day) b. Commercial/ind. (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: 21 un~ts ~rom 32056 S.F. to 20000 S.F. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\CO[JNTI:~\i~T~Tr~ ~^~m '>,nn Attached (indicate whether units ara rantal or for sale units): Sa1¢ 21)Anticipated range of sale p#ces and/or rents: Sale Pdce(s) $. to Rent (per month) 22)Specifynumberofbedmomsbyunittype: 4 f;O 5 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 4 ~-o 5 24)Indicate the expected number of school childran who will be rasiding wfthin the project: Contact the approphate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descdbe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Total floor araa of commercial, industtfal, or institutional uses by type: I:\PLAN NING~FINAL\FORMS~COUNTERUNIT,~Tr3'I t.~,~r~ 27) Indicate hou~ of operation: 28) Number of Total: employees: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift.. 29)Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of wonders to be hired that currently r~side in the City: *31)For commercial and industdal use$ only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be vedfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 3~Havethewa~r.~we~fira, andfloodcontrolagendesse~ingtheprojectbeen ~n~ed~ ~rm~ethe~abili~p~vide a~qua~serwce~ ~epreposedproject? ffso, p~ase~dicate~e~ra~onse. Water . is available Sewer = Septic System Fire = Proposed fire system Flood = Etiwanda Creek h\PLANNING\FINAL~ORMS\COUNTER\INITSTD1.WPD 3/00 ~._o -, 3$)/n,_ the known history of this property, has there been any use, s~orage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? ~xamples of hazardous and/or toxic mate#als include, but are not limited to PCB =s; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, so/vents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and desc#be their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known, Not to our knowledge_ 34) V~II the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No I hereby ce~fy that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate eamlUa~ion of this project to the beat of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are troe and correct tot he best y knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate aluabbn can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Tit/e: ~? ~ , ~ ~ ,~,~(~ - h\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER~INITSTD 1 wPr) City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART BACKGROUND 1. Project File: 3-1' 16114 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No. 16113 and No 16115 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map 16114 - The development review of Tentative Tract Map No. 16114, a residential subdivision of 21 single family lots, on approximately 15 acres in the Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project site is located on the southeast corner of East Avenue and 23~ Street (APN No.225-131-16). 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Sake Engineers, Inc. 400 South Ramona Avenue, Suite 202 Corona, CA 92879 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. Zoning: Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units pet acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 15-acre site is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and 23rd Street, and is rectangular in shape. Etiwanda Creek Park is located south of the site south of 23"~ Street. Single-family homes are located west of East Avenue. East of the site is undeveloped land but is the site of Tentative Tract Map No. 16115, another single-family residential subdivision. North of the site is undeveloped land, south of Wilson Avenue (approximately 700 feet north of the site). The project site is undeveloped with no existing structures. The site is directly southeast of the site of Tentative Tract Map 16113 which is being processed concurrently with this tentative tract map. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (v') Transportation/Circulation ( ) Population and Housing (¢') Biological Resources (,") P'ublic Services (v') Utilities and Service Systems (,,') Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (v') Aesthetics (v') Water (¢') Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources (,/) A r Qua ty (v') Noise (,,') Mandatory Findings of Significance (,") Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COUI~D NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (~') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. ed.' ~(,,~~ Sign Nan(~y ~ergus~J3~ ~ S eniOr,,~roject~la nag e r May 25, 2001 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality A~:t Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (~-) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) (~,) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( (.,) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( (,,-) established community? Comments: a-d) The project site is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and 23rd Street (unpaved roads) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The area is designated Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre). The applicant has proposed a subdivision of approximately 15 acres into 21 single-family lots (1.4 units per acre) with lot sizes averaging approximately 25,515 square feet. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the project. Signi§cent Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentJally Unlsss Than 2. POPULA'IION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (~-) directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( (,,-) housing? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 4 · Comments: a-b) The project consists of the subdivision of 15 acres of land into 21 single-family lots designated as Very Low Density Residential (0.1-2 dwelling units per area) and is located on the northeast corner of East Avenue and 23rd Street, and is approximately 700 feet south of Wilson Avenue. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed. Therefore, the project will not result in a change in population projections. The Cucamonga County Water District confirmed they have the ability 1o provide adequate sewer and water service for the project. c) The project site is currently undeveloped. The site immediately east to the east is undeveloped but is the site of Tentative Tract Map No. 16115 another proposed single-family subdivision. Properties north of the site are undeveloped between the project site and Wilson Avenue. West of the site, west of East Avenue is developed with scattered single family residences. Properties south of the site, south of 23rd Street include the Etiwanda Creek Park. No impacts will result, as no existing housing will be displaced. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentiarly Unless Than 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) (~') b) Seismic ground shaking? (~') ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (v) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil (~') conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) (~') h) Expansive soils? ( ) (,") i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) (~') Comments: a-b) As part of the Preliminary Soil Investigation performed by SID Geotechnical, Inc. in March 2000, a computer search of all known Quaternary major faults within a 50-mile radius was conducted. Results of the search identified 26 faults occurring within 50 miles of the site. Five of the 26 faults identified occur less than ten miles from the site and include the Cucamonga, Glen Helen/Lytle Creek, San Andreas, San Jose, and Sierra Madre/San Fernando faults. The Cucamonga Fault, which is located approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the site, is capable of producing .a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 5 maximum credible earthquake (MCE) of 7.0. The California Division of Mines and Geology (DMG) defines the MCE as the maximum earthquake that appears capable of occurring under the presently-known tectonic framework. The Glen Helen/Lytle Creek fault occurs six miles northeast of the site and has a MCE of 7.0. The San Andreas Fault located nine miles east of the site, has a MCE of 8.0, and the San Jose and Sierra Madre faults, each located approximately eight miles north and northwest of the site, have MCEs of 6.7 and 7.3, respectively. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is not located within a City adopted Special Study Zone; however, the Red Hill Fault is located .5 miles to the northwest and is capable of a MCE of 6.5. c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subject to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude. Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on ground water depths within the area (approximately 200 feet below surface grade), the Preliminary Soils Investigation concluded that the potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely. Adhedng to the City grading standards, the Uniform Building Code, and recommendations presented in the Preliminary Soils Investigation will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. The nearest bodies of water are the Cucamonga County Water Distdct (CCWD) reservoir located approximately one- forth mile southwest of the site and the East Etiwanda Creek located approximately three-fourths of a mile northeast of the site. Given the dist'ance and confinement of these water bodies, development of the project site will not expose people or structures to any potential seiche impacts. The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan. e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal. Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. g-h) The General Plan indicates the Tujunga-Soboba soil association for the site which has only slight erosion potential and runoff potential is slow to very slow. Soils are suitable for residential development. Recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soil Investigation, prepared by SID Geotechnical, Inc., will ensure appropriate grading and compaction of the site. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. The developer will be required to channel the surface runoff from the project to existing storm drains to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant. b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the project site is outside of the 100-year flood plain. c-e) East Etiwanda Creek is located approximately % mile east of the site. As a condition of project approval the applicant must prepare a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed off-site. A final report will be required prior to issuance of grading permits or final map recordation. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 7 Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (~') ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (,,-) ( ) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.) Comments: a-b) Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM~0 and'NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx. Development of 21 homes represents only a fraction of the total emissions of NOx in the county. Based on Table 6-2 "Screening Table for Operation - Daily Thresholds of Potential Significance for Air Quality" within the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the proposed project does not have the potential to exceed the daily emissions significance thresholds. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Sensitive receptors in the area include residences to the immediate east following East Avenue and an intermediate school located one-fourth of a mile south of the site. During grading, fugitive dust (PM10) will be generated. Any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1o emissions. b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces may cause NOx and PM~0 levels to exceed daily significant thresholds. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 8 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed project is the subdivision of 15 acres of land into 21 single-family units, averaging approximately 1.4 units per acre, in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The end use of the proposed project, Very Low Density Residential (0.1-2 dwelling units per acre), will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Impacl ' SlgnificantP°tentia~lYlmpact Less Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (~') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) ( ) (-') nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page g Comments: a) The proposed subdivision will generate approximately 200 weekday vehicle trips and 398 weekend (Saturday and Sunday) vehicle trips as indicated in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-5-A-1 "Average Trip Generation Rates." East Avenue is unimproved (unpaved) between 23'd Street and Wilson Avenue, and Wilson Avenue is unpaved between Etiwanda and Summit avenues. Development of the proposed project will require improvements to portions of Wilson and East avenues. The proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area Very Low Density Residential with a Community Commercial designation at the southeast corner of Wilson and East avenues. The project proponent will be required to construct the necessary street improvements as contained in the conditions of approval for the project, and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. b-d) Access to the site will be provided by a proposed street into the subdivision from East Avenue. The proposed street .will allow full access without impeding the through traffic on East Avenue. Access for emergency vehicles will be adequate with on-site streets to have 50-foot widths and cul-de-sacs having 60-foot widths. e/f) The new development will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists as adequate points of ingress/egress will be provided and adequate parking will be provided along streets. No bus turnouts are proposed. g) Located approximately seven and a half miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially U~lless Than 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ) ( ) ( ) (,~) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ) ( ) (v) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~-) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 10 Comments: a) A biological resources survey of the site was conducted in January 2001. This survey was conducted by a biologist walking a series of transects as prescribed by the resource agencies. The primary objective of this survey was to evaluate the site's potential to support special-status wildlife species including the Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Raphiomidas abdominalis terminatus), western burrowing owl ( Speotyto cunicularia hypugea), mountain plover ( Charadrius montanus), and San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei) and to generally evaluate habitat suitability for other potentially occurring sensitive wildlife species based on existing conditions. General plant and wildlife species present at the site were identified and recorded to assess the overall habitat value. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles including the San Diego horned lizard, orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperthrus) and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Poliptila californica californica). The site occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the US Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area. Survey Results The project site is primarily characterized as a disturbed vacant lot dominated by California buckwheat and plant species consistent with regular human/mechanical disturbance. Several dirt roads traverse the site and sheep grazing is a common practice. The site is also littered with household trash and debris. Overall vegetative cover is approximately 75 percent across the site. The site is a portion of an alluvial fan and is relatively flat to gently sloping with gravelly, rocky sands characterizing the soils. Veqetation Native California buckwheat is the dominant plant species on site, interspersed with native California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), California croton, California broom (Lotus scoparius), brittlebrush (Encilia farinosa), and telegraph weed. Non- native species present include brome grasses (Bromus spp.) and mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). Though native plant species were dominant and covered approximately 70 percent of the site, vegetation was sparse and the plants that were present were grazed by sheep. Wildlife Little nesting habitat is available for locally occurring native bird species. The eucalyptus trees located on Tentative Tract Map No. 16113, immediately northwest of the project site provide some roosting and limited nesting for locally occurring birds of prey. However, there were no indications of remnant nest from previous nesting seasons and no evidence that the site is suitable to support any special status vertebrate species. Likewise, on the project site, there was a lack of nesting and roosting opportunities due to the lack of trees on-site. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 11 The site does not support open areas consistent with habitats required by the mountain plover. No burrowing owls or evidence of their presence on site were observed or detected during the survey. This species is not known to occur in the project vicinity. The evaluation of on-site habitat for the orange-throated whiptail concluded that there is Iow potential for this species to occur on site. Likewise, habitat conditions on the project site are not conducive to the San Diego homed lizard. Because the nearby site of Tentative Tract Map No. 16113 supports five to six acres of scrub habitat, focussed surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were conducted by a biologist holding an individual Section 10(a) Endangered Species Recovery Permit issued by USFWS. Following USFWS survey protocols for the species a series of six individual surveys were conducted between March 16 and April 30. All potential habitat areas were systematically surveyed along random transects. Calling points for the bird were separated by approximately 50 meters or as needed. No gnatcatchers were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site during the protocol surveys. Therefore, no further consideration of biological resources is required. b-c) There are no existing trees on-site. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The biologist conducting the surveys in January and May determined that surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Development includes residential development to the east, a park and school to the south, and development of Wilson and East avenues (although unpaved and without infrastructure). Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially Unless Than 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (~-) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) nefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 12 c) The project site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ- 2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate extraction resource area (Figure IV-2, General Plan). Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: Polentially U~lless Than 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (-') health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (~) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a/c/d) Based on the current state of the site (undeveloped with minimal human disturbance), it is not likely that the site has been used for commercial or industrial purposes. The Preliminary Soil Investigation prepared by SlD Geotechnical, Inc., indicated that minor amounts of household debris were noted on-site. Given the natural of this waste, it is unlikely it will present a health hazard. b) Improvement of Wilson and East Avenues will include appropriate lighting, curbs and sidewalks to ensure standard emergency response times and efficient evacuation of residents in the event of an emergency. Additionally all streets, adjacent and within the proposed development, will have widths from 50 to 60 feet to provide adequate emergency-vehicle clearance. e) Approximately 70 percent of the site is covered be vegetation although it is sparse and the plants that were present were grazed by sheep. This vegetation provides fuel for potential wildfires. The Etiwanda area and the entire area noah of the City limits are more susceptible to fires than any other area within the City due to the presence of fire-prone vegetation, less convenient access by fire fighting equipment, lack of water service and inadequate water pressure. Development of the proposed project would remove vegetation from the site, construct paved 50- to 60-foot internal wide roads, extend water service and Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 13 provide adequate fire suppression equipment within the area. These improvements will reduce fire hazards within the area. However, the project is still subject to special wild land/urban hazard conditions due to its proximity to undeveloped areas. As a condition of tract map approval, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District will require the preparation of a fuel modification/vegetation management plan for the site. The plan must be approved by the Distdct prior to recordation of the final tract map. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (,,-) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) 0 ('") ( ) Comments: a) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered significant as the project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the corresponding land use designation. b) The proposed project is the development of 21 single family lots immediately east of East Avenue, north of 23r~ Street and approximately 700 feet south of Wilson Avenue. The extension of infrastructure and utilities in the area may increase travel on Wilson and East avenues. This additional travel may increase ambient noise levels at the proposed site. However, based on the Very Low Density Residential designation and large lot sizes (averaging 25,515 square feet), future traffic noise in the area is not expected to exceed City noise limits. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiarly Unrsss Than 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (,,,) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) (~.) ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 14 Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The project site is located immediately east of East Avenue, north of 23r~ Street and 700 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is U.S. Forest Service fire station located on Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Victoria Street, approximately one mile southwest of the site. The US Forest Service is not part of 911 dispatch for fires; however, they will assist the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District upon request, but not usually for structural fires; therefore, the closest fire station that would typically respond would be located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard approximately three miles southwest of the project site. The Foothill Fire District is responsible for evaluating the project through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Police Protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department. =l'he proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors. Additional police protection is not required as the addition of 21 single family residential homes will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the project site is small, approximately 15 acres. Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this condition, impacts to the School Districts are considered to be less than significant. Parks - Proposed 21 single family homes will not generate a substantial number of new people to the area. Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, the new residential community will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area as Very Low Density Residential with suspected future traffic after development. The project proponent will be required to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially Unless Than 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.) b) Commun cation systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (,,) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.) Comments: a-g) The proposed subdivision will include the development of 21 single-family lots. Development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area (school/park and residents located south and east of the site, respectively), are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. Waste will be disposed of at the County of San Bemardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. A Drainage Report will be required to address projected storm flows and proposed storm drain construction (se Issue 4 above). Drainage Plans will be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for City Engineer review and approval. Therefore mitigation is not required. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ote,t~,v Unless Thar~ 13.AESTHETICS. Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (..) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (.~) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~.) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 16 Comments: a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway'view corridor. The area is designated Very Low Density Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. c) The project will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant. However, the site has been identified as an area to include residences as under the Etiwanda Specific Plan. New light will be typical of a small residential neighborhood and would not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other future residential development in the area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polenlially Unless Then 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would theproposah a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') b) Disturb archaeological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (-') the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. Additionally, the site is located in a developing area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially UnleSS Than t 5. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) (,~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (-') Comments: a) The developer of the project will be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval, The impact is not considered significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 17 b) The proposed project will be constructed on vacant land, which is designated Very Low Density Residential. With the exception of the southeast corner of Wilson and East Avenues and the area south of the site, designated Community Commercial (CC) and Park (P) respectively, the remaining area surrounding the project site is designated residential and is vacant, developed or proposed for development. Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( (,,,) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustainin, g levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential (,,,) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ('") 0 are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) (,,-) ( ) ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) A biological resources survey of the site was conducted in January 2001. This survey was conducted by a biologist walking a series of transects as prescribed by the resource agencies. The primary objective of this survey was to evaluate the site's potential to support special-status wildlife species including the Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Raphiomidas abdominalis terminatus), western burrowing owl Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 18 (Speotyto cunicularia hypugea), mountain plover ( Charadrius montanus), and San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvilleO and to,generally evaluate habitat suitability for other potentially occurring sensitive wildlife species based on existing conditions. General plant and wildlife species present at the site were identified and recorded to assess the overall habitat value. A review of the literature showed that a number of special status wildlife species have been identified as occurring within a large area encompassing the Cucamonga Peak and Devore USGS quadrangles including the San Diego homed lizard, orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperthrus) and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Poliptila californica californica). The site occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the US Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area. The project site is primarily characterized as a disturbed vacant lot dominated by California buckwheat and plant species consistent with regular human/mechanical disturbance. Several dirt roads traverse the site and sheep grazing is a common practice. The site is also littered with household trash and debris. Overall vegetative cover is approximately 75 percent across the site. The site is a portion of an alluvial fan and is relatively flat to gently sloping with gravelly, rocky sands characterizing the soils. Native California buckwheat is the dominant plant species on site, interspersed with native California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), California croton, California broom (Lotus scoparius), brittlebrush (Encilia farinosa), and telegraph weed. Non-native species present include brome grasses (Bromus spp.) and mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). Though native plant species were dominant and covered approximately 70 percent of the site, vegetation was sparse and the plants that were present were grazed by sheep. Little nesting habitat is available for locally occurring native bird species. The eucalyptus trees located on Tentative Tract Map No. 16113, immediately northwest of the project site provide some roosting and limited nesting for locally occurring birds of prey. However, there were no indications of remnant nest from previous nesting seasons and no evidence that the site is suitable to support any special status vertebrate species. Likewise, on the project site, there was a lack of nesting and roosting opportunities due to the lack of trees on-site. The site does not support open areas consistent with habitats required by the mountain plover. No burrowing owls or evidence of their presence on site were observed or detected during the survey. This species is not known to occur in the project vicinity. The evaluation of on-site habitat for the orange-throated whiptail concluded that there is Iow potential for this species to occur on site. Likewise, habitat conditions on the project site are not conducive to the San Diego horned lizard. Because the nearby site of Tentative Tract Map No. 16113 supports five to six acres of scrub habitat, focussed surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were conducted by a biologist holding an individual Section 10(a) Endangered Species Recovery Permit issued by USFWS. Following USFVVS survey protocols for the species a series of six individual surveys were conducted between March 16 and Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16114 Page 19 April 30. All potential habitat areas were systematically surveyed along random transects. Calling points for the bird were separated by approximately 50 meters or as needed. No gnatcatchers were observed or detected on or adjacent to the project site during the protocol surveys. Therefore, no further consideration of biological resources is required. b) The Initial Study identified shod-term impacts to air quality with development of the project site. The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activities. However, the impacts will cease once construction activities are completed. Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant. c) Cumulative effects of residential development in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area were identified in a previous environmental document. Appropriate analysis and mitigation measures were developed prior to the implementation of the Specific Plan. No additional mitigation measures beyond those presented in the specific plan and this Initial Study are required. d) Development of 21 single-family residences would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce impacts to less than significant. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and will cease once construction activities are completed. FI~OM : FAX NO, ; 1TO~6551-~B1 Ju~, 1~ ~01 Og;~AM P2 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16 [ 14 Page 20 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may rm used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR 0;' Negative Doctaration per Section 15063(c){3)(D). The effects ident~ed above for this project were within the scope of and aOequate~y analyzed in the following earr~er document(s) pursuant to applicable legal ~(~l'dS, arid ~;h effe~ the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for m~,iew in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 1050D Civic Center Drive (chec~ all that apply): Etiwand~ Specfr~c Plan (Ce~fied 1983) (vi Master Environmental Assessment and Genera] Plan EIR - C~ of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified January 4, 1989) (viGeneral Plan EIR - City of Rancho Cucamonga (Cedified January 4, 1981) (v') AmheologicaJ Study (~') Summary of Results of Focussed USFWS Protocol Surveys for Coastal California Gnatcatcher on Tract Numbers 16113 and 16114, CH of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, May 17, 2001 Results of a Special Status Wild0fe Species Habitat Based Evaluation on Tract NumbeTs 16113 and 16114, City of Rancho Cucamonge, San Ben, mrdino County, California, January 15, 2001. APPLICANT ~:~,B.TII~ CATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM rite APPLICANT FOR THE PROJECT D~SCRIBED IN THIS INITIAL STUDY. I ACKNOWLI)OE THAT I HAVE READ TH'iS INITIAL STUDY AND ~ PROPOSED MITIOATION MEASU1/flS. FURTHI~I~ I HAVE I~'VISED THE PRO.Wr_,CT PLANS OR PROPOSALS AND,~R ~ IEREBY AG'RI~E TO ~ PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURF~ TO AVOID THE EFFECTS O~ MITIOATE THE F.~I-'ECTS TO A POINT ~rI--~RE C~Y NO SlGNIF/CANT ENVTRO ~MENTAL EI--~ECT~ WOULD OCCUIL City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract SUBTT16114 Public Review Period Closes: June 27, 2001 Project Name: Project Applicant: Sake Engineem, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the east side of East Avenue, north of 23rd Street- APN: 225-131-16. Project Description: A request to subdivide 15 acres of land into 21 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acm) of the Efiwanda Specific Plan. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that them is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public mviewwould avoid the effects or mi~gate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) Them is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents ara available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. June 27, 2001 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE (~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16114, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 21 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF 23RD STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-130-16. A. Recitals. 1. Sake Engineering filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map 16114 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on June 27, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the east side of East Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 594 feet on East Avenue and a lot depth of 1,064 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north, east, and west of the subject site is vacant, and the property to the south is the existing Etiwanda Creek Park, and c. The project is designed in conformance with the Very Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d. The design of the project, including roadway alignment, trails, and grading will provide efficient use of land to accommodate single-family homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3-1'16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 2 a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, De~'elopment Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial.environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; furthermore, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources, or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below, and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 3 Plannin,q Division: ,. 1) Provide a concrete textured finish at all mid-block trail crossings. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed 65 dBA, plus the limits specified in the Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall monitor weekly noise levels as specified in the Development Code Section 17.02.120. The Planning Division may require monitoring at other times. Developer shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The developer shall construct gated local feeder trail entrances consistent with the "Feeder Trail 20-foot to 15-foot Transition: Vehicle Gate with Side Access" Standard Drawing 1006-B. En.qineerln,q Division: 1) East Avenue shall be improved as follows: a) Between the north and south tract boundaries, the east one-half of the road shall be improved full width, in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" (88-foot R/VV) standards and Figure 5-28 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The west one-half of the road shall be 18 feet of pavement. Final signing and stdping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. b) Provide a continuous all weather sudace walking path on.the east side of East Avenue from Summit to Wilson c) East Avenue from the northerly tract boundary to Wilson Avenue and from the southerly tract boundary to Summit Avenue is to be 36 feet of AC pavement. Final signing and striping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. Provide AC berm as needed to control drainage. 2) Wilson Avenue between East and Etiwanda Avenues shall be improved with 36 feet of pavement. Final signing and stdping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the required Transportation Development Fee for permanent "backbone" improvements on Wilson Avenue, including the 14 feet of permanent pavement on either side of the ultimate median, in conformance with City policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off-site improvements other than the "backbone" portion (and if applicable one-half the cost of the Wilson Avenue median island PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. '1-]'16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 4 landscaping) from future development of the adjacent properties. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements being accepted by the City, all fights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3) The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the required Transportation Development Fee for permanent "backbone" improvements on East Avenue and across the MWD property, in conformance with City policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent off-site improvements other than the "backbone" portion from future development of adjacent properties. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all fights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Provide R26(s) "NO STOPPING" s!gns along the East Avenue frontage and provide additional traffic striping and signage, as required. 5) All intemal streets to be improved to City "Local Residential Street" (36- foot curb to curb) standards. 50-foot fights-of-way, per Etiwanda Specific Plan, Figure 5-15, are acceptable. Provide a 5-foot sidewalk easement on one side of the street. 6) Future driveways on comer lots shall be located the maximum distance allowed bythe lot size from the intersection's "beginning of curb return" (BCR), to minimize conflicts between vehicles turning fight and those backing out of driveways. 7) In addition to hydrology and hydraulics for storm drains and basins, the final drainage report, shall address the need to provide flood protection walls and other measures at the northerly boundary for the possibility of runoff or breakout from the existing Wilson Avenue dirt swale. The Summit School Flood Prevention Plan, on file in the office of the City Engineer, noted the breakout issue and it shall be addressed with this project. Off-site flows diverted by said facilities shall not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 8) Construct Area 6 Master Plan Strom Drain facilities in Summit Avenue from the southerly projection of the east tract boundary to the Upper Etiwanda Regional Mainline Channel and/or Intedm Master Basin No. 4, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities (not intedm basins) and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, in accordance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all fights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a) If San Bemardino County Flood Control Distdct (SBCFCD) agrees to an alternate location for the storm drain connection to the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 5 regional mainline channel, the City will accept that in lie. u of the line in Summit Avenue. An interim basin will still be required. b) Only facilities serving 80 acres or more will be eligible for drainage fee credits. 9) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drain. The cost of local storm drains shall be home by this development. a) All sump catch basins shall be designed to handle Q100. b) Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain Q25 within the tops of street curbs (Q50 at sumps), Q100 within rights-of-way, and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q100. c) If SBCFCD does not agree to an alternate location for the storm drain connection to the regiohal mainline channel, developer will need to install local facilities across the City park and Etiwanda School Distdct property. d) Any required over sizing of the local storm drain system due to off-site drainage areas, will be eligible for reimbursement agreements from other developers of those off-site drainage areas, but not from the City. 10) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Interim Master Basin No. 4 as follows, justified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. a) Provide an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed tributary area. b) Install sufficient capacity to mitigate the increased runofffrom this development with an outlet system capable of handling the ultimate basin design (entire tributary area) with a minimum amount of modification as incremental development occurs. c) Provide an easement to the City for the portion of the property containing the initial basin and an irrevocable offer of dedication for the remainder of the ultimate basin design. d) An assessment distdct shall be formed for maintenance of the detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attomey, guaranteeing private maintenance of the facility. The maintenance agreement shall provide the City with the right of access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allow the City to assess those costs to the developer. Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property. e) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 'I-r16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 6 related facilities (outlet, etc.) from future developments using the basin. If the developer fails to submit said reimbdrSement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 11) The drainage issues shall be resolved, to the satisfaction of all involved agencies, pdor to recordation of the Final Map as follows: a) A final drainage study shall be prepared. In addition to the design and sizing of the drainage facilities for the project, the alignment needs to be designated. b) The developer, at his sole expense and effort, shall acquire all easements necessary to accommodate ultimate, local, and/or interim facilities. In the event the developer is not able to acquire the necessary off-site right-or-way, the Final Map shall be disapproved per Chapter 4, Article 1, and Section 66473 of the Subdivision Map ACt. 12) Summit school is anticipating the installation of a local drainage facility along their east border, which will be sized to receive flows from Tentative Tract 16114. Tentative Tract 16114 shall be responsible to contribute its fair share cost, based upon tributary gross acres, to the School District prior to recordation of the final map. Environmental Miti,qation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction-grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. -I-r16114 - SAKE ENGINEERING June 27, 2001 Page 7 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean al,temative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not in use. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: L. J. Henderson, Acting Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16114 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.' 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is vedfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring altar wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after 'project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessa~j funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TT 16114 Applicant: Sake En.qineers, Inc. Initial Study Prepared by: . Nancy Ferquson Date: May 25, 2001 The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent) CP C Review of plans A/C 2 approved by SCAQMD and RWQCR) daily to reduce PM~o emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by CP C Review of plans A/C 2 the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. ~ming may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such CP C Review of plans A/C 2 episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB} shall ~)be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for CP C Review of plans A/C 2 · 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. ~Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on Iow emission factom and high-energy efficiency. All construction CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 when not in use. Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies I Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP I:\PLANNIN G\FINAL\CEQA\M MC HKLST.WPD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16114 SUBJECT: 21-LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: SAKE ENGINEERING LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF 23RD STREET ALL OF .THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. SC-04-01 I D['~ Project NO.'CT16114 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,~or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 7. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed / / control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shalr upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjuncfion with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with / two-mil, 4-inch Iodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement; however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as / veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. c. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a / distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d.Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. e. For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural OveHay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 8. Ail parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of ail lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. SC-04-01 2 b~ Project No. TT16114 Completion Date 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the interior boundary/residential side of __/____ the identified local feeder trail and include a minimum 10-foot wide equestrian access gate. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. ,~ 11. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Y=-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds· Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 12. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / 13. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to / maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 14. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. 15. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom Pot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 __/__ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. Ail private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting· 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. ~7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 3 Project No.TT16114. C__qr'npletion [)ate 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the / design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 9. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear / feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). E. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / / of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes arid the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: / / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and 9.Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TI' #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. SC-04-01 4 b~)'~ Project No. TT16114 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. __/____ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / the City prior to permit issuance. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5.Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). 2. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3.A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. Project No..TT16114 Co[npletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / street centerline): 44 total feet on East Avenue. / 2. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / 3. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for / approved openings: East Avenue. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be / dedicated to the City. L. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gbtter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be __/ constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / Street Name Curb & A.C, Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other East Avenue x x x x x Wilson Avenue / x / x / x/ / x / x I / / // Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights __/ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map apprevaJ or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. SC~4~1 6 ~ Project No. TT16114 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ~ d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2)Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or I~,ne closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Community Trail. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3.All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4.Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan East Avenue and Wilson Avenue: Etiwanda Specific Plan. Project No. TT16114 Completion [)ate N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. A permit fi-om the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its / / right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured / / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a / / sump catch basin on the public street. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __/ / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of apl other residential projects. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2.Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: San Bernardino County (north half of Wilson Avenue) and SBCFCD. 3. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. SC-04-01 8 D~[~O Project No. TT16114 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION i~LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: Q, Community Facilities Districts . 1. This project is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. R. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. 3. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 1,750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-B, as amended. 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering'any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 5.Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. 6. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucemonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. S, Water Availability 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. T. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 2.Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system requires Fire District approval, and a permit. NO WORK is permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 3.All structures which do not meet Fire District Access Requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Projecl No,'13'16114 Cornpletion Date 4. Required Note: Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commemial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section "E" - Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any ;;utomatic fire sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire District permit. 6. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire District. U. Fire Access 1. Residential: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tractJparcel map, the applicant shall obtair __/ approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes. All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards. 2. Residential & Commemial: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and / obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional vieW, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow Fine. Ail proposed fire apparatus tumarounds shall be cleady marked when a dead-end ~treet exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 3. The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet. The minimum inside turn / / radius is 20 feet. The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet. 4. A note shall be placed on all plans which cleady indicates the following: Emergency access, a / minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distdct Standards. 5. Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire District standards. Dead-end roadways / shall not exceed 600 feet in length. 6. Amend site access to accommodate Fire District emergency vehicle access or provide automatic fire sprinkler system for each structure. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access - Fire Lanes" standard. 8. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. SC-04-01 10 .~) ~;) Project No.~r-16114 Completion Date 9. New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting __/ / background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry, V. Hazard Notification - Fire (State Law) 1. For projects located in the State Responsibility Areas (SPA), or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity / /__ Zone (VHFHSZ) known as the "Special Fire Protection Area" by the Fire District State Law requires notification. Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall place a note on the map stating the project is located within the State Responsibility Area or the "Special Fire Protection Area," as appropriate, due to wildland exposure. The note is subject to the approval of the Fire District and is based on SP, A/VHFHSZ maps produced by the Califomia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2. Special Fire Protection Area Development: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant __1__/ shall meet all requirements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SPA). This may include increased street widths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire sprinklers, etc., contained in the Fire Safety Overlay District Standards. W. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for all Maps and Plans) 1. This project is located in a designated high fire hazard area based on proximity to or exposure urban __/ / wildland interface. Mitigation measures are required. 2. Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading perm[t, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District / / approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. 3. Prior to the issuance of any precise grading permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of __/__ a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hn:,ard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to final on-site inspection. 5. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed. The Fire Distdct shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas. Further, the installed fuel modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District. The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel medification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subject to (annual) triennial inspections. 6.Phased projects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District. X. Combustible Construction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. SC-04-01 11 Completion [)ate Y. Fees 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows:** a. $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection " b. $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) **Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. Z. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Cedes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. NOTE: A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being propose~ will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer. AA. Other Requirements/Comments 1. NOTE: Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire District comments and/or conditions. THE C [ T Y OF ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION DRC2001-00191 - TOP WEST END, INC. - A request to allow a tow service and impound yard in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at 8370 Vineyard Avenue. APN: 207-271-51 and 052. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Self-Storage/General Industrial Subarea 1 South - Cucamonga Creek Channel and vacant land/General Industrial Subarea 1 East - Vacant land/General Industrial Subarea 2 West - Cucamonga Creek Channel and vacant land/General Industrial Subarea i B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site at 8370 Vineyard Avenue is that of the former egg ranch that has recently been remodeled and converted to an auto/body repair facility. Dudng the review of Minor Development Review 97-21, parking of the proposed facilitywas an issue, as parking is proposed both within a portion of the Flood Control Property along Cucamonga Creek and within a portion of the future expansion of Vineyard Avenue. The San Bemardino County Flood Control Distdct has entered into a lease agreement with the property owner; however, the parking spaces along Vineyard Avenue are considered temporary and are not included in the overall parking calculations for the auto/body facility. A total of 43 parking spaces were delineated on the approved plan, excluding the 15 spaces along Vineyard Avenue. The auto/body shop requires 27 spaces per the requirements of the Development Code (see Section D); therefore, there are 16 spaces available for the proposed tow use. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UDDRC2001-00191 - TOP WEST END, INC. June 27,2001 Page 2 D. Parkinq Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota.qe Ratios Required Provided AUTO BODY SHOP Retail 2,400 1/250 SF 10 Office 1,500 1/250 SF 6 Service Bays 4 bays 2 bays + 3 11 TOTAL 27 43 TOP WEST END TOWING Tow Service (Office) 6 spaces 6 6 Towing Yard N/A 10 TOTAL 16 BOTH BUSINESSES 43 ANALYSIS: Top West End, Inc. would like to establish an office within the same building, and towing service on the same site as the auto/body facility. The applicant has indicated that much of the towing service is done in conjunction with the auto/body shop. However, Top West End, Inc. desires this location as an impound yard in order to gain additional towing contracts with the City Police Department and the local section of the Califomia Highway Patrol. The Development Code defines impound yards as Heavy Wholesale, Storage and Distribution, which are permitted only in the Heavy Industrial Districts. Previously, the Planning Commission made a Use Determination that a tow service with an impound yard can be considered as an interim use in the General Industrial District. Several such businesses have since been approved by a conditional use permit for up to 5 years. The difference in this case is that the tow service is not being requested as an intedm use. The applicant indicated that they would like to be able to park a maximum of 20 vehicles on-site at any one time; however, only 16 spaces are available based on the approved plan. The location of the parking area is shown on Exhibit "B" (all parking is located west of the existing building), screening view of the vehicles from Vineyard Avenue. A large percentage of the vehicles that are towed to the site will be repaired at the body shop rather than simply being impounded. Based on the circumstances that are peculiar to this site, including the cooperative operation between the auto/body repair and the towing service, and that 16 parking spaces indicated on the approved plan ara in excess of the required parking for the auto/body facility, staff can support the tow service at this location with a maximum of 16 spaces devoted to the towing service operation. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UDDRC2001-00191 -TOP WEST END, INC. June 27, 2001 Page 3 Staff could support the tow service, with the approval of a conditional use permit, for an operation that would dispatch tow trucks with the pdmary purpose of bdnging vehicles to the site that will be repaired at the body shop. No long-term impound yard would be allowed at this site. Top West End, Inc. has other facilities located in Ontado, Glen Avon, Oak Hills, and Chino, to which the vehicles needing long-term impounding will be directed. The application for the conditional use permit shall indicate the required parking for both uses, providing the required 27 spaces for the auto/body facility. The Minor Development Review Site Plan was approved showing 43 parking spaces, which would leave 16 spaces for use by the tow service. A revised Parking and Sthping Plan, along with a site visit to confirm accuracy, may be considered dudng the review of the conditional use permit. All stored vehicles, including the tow trucks for both businesses, must be completely screened from Vineyard Avenue and Ninth Street. RECOMMEND_.ATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider ~hat the proposed operation by Top West End, Inc. be allowed through the review and approval of a conditional use permit to operate a towing service in cooperation with the on-site auto/body shop within the General Industrial District, located at 8370 Vineyard Avenue, given the site specific conditions and operational characteristics of the proposed operation as analyzed herein, and the fact that the applicant will not conduct a standard long-term vehicle impound yard at this location. Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letters from Top West End, Inc. dated Apdl 11,2001, and May 3, 2001 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval for Use Determination DR02001-00191 WEST END, INC. 24HR. Towing&Fi oowr¥ April 11, 2001 city of cho Cucamo ga Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Application for Similar Use Section 17.02.040, B Dear City Commissioner, This letter comes to you with regards to the above referenced section number and shall serve as our written explanation for our application for Similar Use. We are an automotive towing company who is looking to accept a tow service agreement with the California Highway Patrol (CH1o) and the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department. A condition to accepting the agreement, we would have to strategically house a satellite office of our towing operation in Rancho Cucarnoaga. We have located 8730 Vineyard Avenue, a location which is the southwest comer of Vineyard Avenue and 9* Street. We have found this location to be ideal for our needs for it gives tls a direct route to Interstate 10. This route would allow us to respond efficiently and expeditiously to highway related CHP requests, a requirement that must bo met in order to comply with a tow service agreement. Currently, the aforementioned location has a determined use for "Automotive Fleet Storage." Hence, we would like to apply for determination of similar use for the aforementioned location~ Therefore, the following is our declaration of the business activities that would operate from the location 8730 Vineyard Avenue: Fleet Storage: none; Automotive Storage: vehicles stored or impounded by authority ora police agency would be placed at this location which has indoor storage capabilities; and Administration: this location would house at least one employee during normal business hours, Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 p.m. for the purpose of releasing vehicles fi.om impound in addition · CORPORATE OFFICE: P.O. BOX 3865 [3 ONTARIO, CA 91761 [] (909) 360-3510 [3 FAX (909) 360-3459 ~-~/~1~/~--- ~ /" 9649 EELLEGRAVE AVENUE ~30LE" AVON, CA 92509 5900 MARIPOSA ROAD [] OAK HILLS, CA 92345 12061 PIPELINE AVENUE [] CHINO, CA91710 Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga April 11, 2001 to providing general administrative services. Should you find the above noted declaration need any further explanation, please do not hesitate to contact us immediately and we would be happy to set up a time to meet on behalf of this request. I personally can be reached Monday through Friday between 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. at (909) 360-3510. I look forward to and anticipate your timely response. Sincerely, TOP We~End, Inc. __ Robert Watson President/Owner WEST END, INC. May 3, 2001 O~TY OF RANCHO GOC/~O~6A 10 2001 ~. De~ Mei~ RECENED ' PLANNING Co~ Developmem D~t Ci~ of~eho ~emo~a 10500 Ci~c C~ter ~ve ~cho Cucmong~ CA 91730 Re: DRC2001-00191 - USE DE~A~ON De~ ~. Meier, We ~e ~ receipt of you le~er dated Ap~ 26, 2001 ~d we apprec~te yo~ ~e~ re~ to o~ ~p~cation for u~ dete~tion. In re~ to yo~ reque~ for additio~ ~o~tion ~ rester to the t~ ofbusMess operation for wMch we wo~d ~e ~e ~c~, ~e foHo~g should give you a ~Rer e~tion ofo~ b~Mess: nm~r ofveMeles t~t woMd ~ brought to 8370 VMey~d Ave. woMd ~ ~ e~t~ two (2) ~ ~ day; the ~ nm~r ofveMcles ~at woMd ~ stored on site would ~ ~ est~t~ ~en~ ~ve~cles; shoed ~y ve~cle towed by o~ comply ~t~ the ~ of 8~70 V~ey~d Ave. t~t ~ ~ n~d of~dy work or automotive rep~, ~t ve~cle ~en ~ ~ ~o~d m ~e ~oremention~ location w~e a~t~g those se~ces; for yo~ ~omtio~ TOP West End To~ ~t~ t~ o~er y~ds ~d w~e tho~ y~ds ~e not ~ ~e gene~ hc~ of the ~oremention~ locmio~ ~e ~jo~ ofve~cles tow~ for r~om o~r ~ tr~c co.ion d~es or rep~, those ve~cles ~ ~ ~en m one ofo~ o~er ~ee y~ds. CORPORATE OFFICE: p.O. BOX 3865 [] ONTARIO, CA 91761 [3 (909) 360-3510 [] FAX (909) 360-3459 9649 BELLEGRAVE AVENUE [~ GLEN AVON, CA 92509 5900 MARIPOSA ROAD [3 OAK HILLS, CA 92345 12061 PIPELINE AVENUE [3 CHINO, CA 91710 Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga May 3, 2001 We hope that the above explanation assists you in furthering your understanding of our daily operation- Again, please do not hesitate to contact or write our office with any questions. Sincerely, TOP West End, Inc. Robert Watson RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USE DETERMINATION DRC2001-00191, DETERMINING THAT A TOW SERVICE IS CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1), LOCATED AT 8370 VINEYARD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207-271-51 and 052. A. Recitals. 1. Top West End, Inc. filed for the approval of Use Determination DRC2001-00191, as described in the title Of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on June 27, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application contemplates a towing service in conjunction with the operation of an existing auto/body repair facility located in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1); and b. The towing service would act as an ancillary use to the auto/body repair facility, which is a permitted use within the General Industrial District; and c. The function of the tow service can be conducted using 16 available parking spaces within the rear of the existing building in order to eliminate views of parked cars from Vineyard Avenue; and d. The applicant is not proposing a long term impound yard; and e. In order to further regulate the operation of the towing service, a conditional use permit would be required to establish the operation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UDDRC2001-00191- TOPWEST END, INC June 27, 2001 Page2 3. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced meeting and upon specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The use in question will be operated as an ancillary use with the auto/body repair facility, which is a permitted use in the General Industrial Distdct (Subarea 1); and b. The tow service will be approved as an ancillary use to the auto/body facility through the approval of a conditional use permit; and c. The tow service in question meets the purpose and intent of the General Industrial District and is subject to all other development standards within the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby determines that tow service, without long-term impound yard, can be considered as an ancillary use to the existing auto/body facility located at 8370 Vineyard Avenue, and will be conditionally permitted at this location given the site specific characteristics of both the existing and proposed operations, and the Industrial Districts of the Development Code. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: L. J. Henderson, Acting Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: T H E C I T Y O F IIIII RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Contrect Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A request to initiate an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow the transfer of density and/or open space to non-contiguous parcels when using the Optional Development Standards (Figure 5~3). Related Files: Tentative Tract 16195 and Pre-Application Review DRC2001-00090. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a pre-Application Review Workshop on March 14, 2001, to discuss the basic concept of the density and open space transfer concept, specifically related to the project proposed by Colorado Pacific Communities. Approximately 45 acres will be used for residential development (using the Optional Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), and 13 acres, located approximately 2,050 feet to the south along Etiwanda Avenue, will be used for open space; and in this case, rather than remaining as pdvate common open space, it will become a City park. The Commission agreed that such a concept had medt and encoureged the applicant to proceed with a development review application. Colorado Pacific Communities has since submitted a Tentative Tract Map and Development Agreement that are necessary steps in the implementation of the proposed project. On May 22, 2001, staff received a letter from Colorado Pacific Communities requesting that the Planning Commission consider initiating an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3) to allow the transfer of open space and density to non-contiguous parcels within the Specific Plan area as another step in allowing their project to move forward. In addition, it would then allow the Planning Commission to consider other requests for transferring density and/or open space within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, where the goals of the Specific Plan can be fulfilled. ANALYSIS: Colorado Pacific Communities has submitted Tentative Tract 16195. Along with the Tract Map, the Planning Commission will consider a Conceptual Landscape Master Plan, a Development Agreement, and a Tree Removal Permit, along with this Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment. This project (which was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on June 5, 2001 ) includes the concept of utilizing two non-contiguous parcels within the context of the whole project ITEM .F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ESPA 01-01 - COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES June 27,2001 Page 2 description in order to analyze the land use consistency of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, along with the provisions of open space requirements of the Optional Development Standards of the Specific Plan. This particular project consists of a subdivision of 139 single-family lots on a 45.28-acre parcel within the Very Low Residential District, and 13.25 acres of open space in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. All residential development is proposed on the 45.28-acre parcel, located near the southeast comer of Highland Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, and all the required open space, per the optional development standards, is provided on the 13.25-acre parcel, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Victoda Avenue. Currently, the Etiwanda Specific Plan has no provisions to allow for the transferring of density and/or open space as proposed by this project. By amending textual provisions of the Optional Development Standards, it would be possible to not only allow this project to proceed, but consider other similar requests in the future. The basic premise is that there will be a public benefit to this type of transfer process that will be considered on a case-by-case basis. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission agree to have staff initiate an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Optional Development Standards (figure 5-3) that will run concurrently with the proposed Tentative Tract Map 16195 and Development Agreement, which has been submitted by Colorado Pacific Communities. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's letter dated May 22, 2001. Exhibit "8" - Etiwanda Specific Plan Optional Development Standards Figure 5-3 Exhibit "C"- Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated March 14, 2001 PACIFI¢ May 22,2001 Ms. Debra Meier Senior Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic C~ntcr Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment Dear Dcbra: In order to facilitate the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 16195, and any ancillary entitlements, I am requesting that the City of Rancho Cueamonga initiate the necessary land-use and other textual amendments to the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which would allow for transfer of Development Densities and required park and open space requirements between non- contiguous parcels within the Specific Plan. Because of the area-wide public policy implications of the amendment which are greater than just a single parcel, I request that the City Planning Commission direct staffto begin the Specific Plan amendment process in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map No 16195 as soon as possible to be able to have these items on the Commissions' meeting in June 2001. Again, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES Danny Brose cc: Rick (3omez, FORMA Per Hemholm, Hall & Foreman Colorado Paciflc.Com munities, LLC · 18800 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92612 o (949) 474-7999 / (949) 474-8258 Fax Etiwanda Specific Plan Pa~t II, Chapter.~5 OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Fig 5-3 Min. Site Area 5 AC 5 AC Number of DU's ;,,:; p;t0~;'.;: Upto 2* (in square feet) ~:'.;~'~¢~D~ per DU f~; ,~r:~ ~:~ per DU ~O0.:upS~ rS. Common Open Spa~ . 25% 30% along private stree~ 25' 5 '-: · at interior site bounda~ 30' 20' Residential Building Separations: side to side 30' 15' other (fiont to side, etc.) 30' (half ~mbined building height) On-site Gmenways (Minimum one connexion across pmje~ site per section 5.33.300) · Note: In order to quali~ for open space credit, common open space areas shall be designed to be visually open to the e~ent possible and shall not be fenced with solid view~bst~cUng fencing for more than 50% of their pedphe~, · Gross Acreage may be ~nsidered for densi~ ~lculations in the ER and VL Distd~s only. CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting March 14, 2001 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart ABSENT: Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Debra Meier, Contract Planner NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW (DRC2001-00090)- COLORADO PACIFIC COMMUNITIES - A concept plan for a single family residential development using optional development standards of the Very Low (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) and Low Density (up to 4 dwelling units per acre) Land Use Districts of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located east of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Highland Avenue-APN: 227-051-01,04-06, 09, and 28 and 227-121-16 and 49. The Workshop commenced at 7:20 p.m. with Commissioners McNeil, Mannedno, Macias and Stewart present, and Commissioner Tolstoy absent. Debra Meier, Contract Planner, made opening statements regarding the project concept that the applicant was proposing as it was explained in the staff Memo dated Mamh 7, 2001. The Applicants Gene Shehe, Rick Gomez, Danny Brose, and Per Hemholm were introduced. Mr. Shehe of FORMA explained additional components of the project proposal on behalf of the applicant, including the aspect of paseo trails within the development with future connection to the park sites, and the potential re-alignment of Highland Avenue to East Avenue. Brad Buller, City Planner, commented that The Kemp House, located on Highland Avenue, which is within the general boundaries of the project site, could potentially be relocated onto the proposed park site. The Commissioners collectively favored this idea since there are other histodc structures within the same block of Etiwanda Avenue. The Commissioners were also intrigued with the basic overall concept of the proposed project, however, they questioned the benefit of such a proposal to the community and to the Etiwanda area. Mr. Buller explained that the Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies a "floating" neighborhood park designation within this block between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue. He suggested as an alternative to the typical 5-acre neighborhood park, the applicants explore alternatives that could provide active open space land not only for the specific project neighborhood, but also the possibility of providing active open space within the Etiwanda Community that is located in close proximity to two schools, the historic depot, and the Rails-to-Trails corridor. He noted that the applicants have considered using the Optional Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, in conjunction with City standard park requirements, to create this concept being considered at the meeting. The Commissioners had several technical questions about the future development that staff had not had the opportunity to explore with the applicant. They commented that specific design proposals have not yet been reviewed or analyzed by staff, other than in general terms, such as 'the realignment of Highland Avenue and the trail connections from the proposed development to the proposed park site. Chairman McNiel agreed that the concept had merit and encouraged the applicant to continue to refine the proposal and work with staff through the Design Review process. He added that many questions would addressed in future Design Review and Planning Commission meetings. The Commissioners were particularly interested in fostering the histodc home collection along Etiwanda Avenue that has evolved in the last few years. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary PC Adjoumed Minutes -2- March 14, 2001 dlJl'l-26-2001( TIlE ) 12: 47 909 453 0551 P. O01 June 26, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dona Smerck ]32]5 Highland Avenue JUN 2 6 20111 Etiwanda, CA 91739 RECEIVED - PLANNING Attn: Gaff Sanchcz, Sec~retary Rancho Cucamong~ Pla~ming Commission Rancho Cueamonga, CA 91 ? 30 Dear Plsnning Commission: I understand there is an item scheduled for the Planning Commission ^~enda for the June 27, 2001 meeting to amend the Efiwanda Specific Plan and allow for the Iransfer of density. As I am unable to attend the June 27~ meeting, ! would h'ke to state for the ~cord that as a homeowner in the Etiwanda area of Rancho Cueamonga I am in opposition to the proposed amendment (#01-01) to the Efiwanda Specific Plan which would allow for the transfer of density and/or open space to non-contiguous parcels. If any additional information is required, please contact me at (909) $99-2451, extension 126. Sincerely, Dona M. Smerek THE CITY OF i~ANCHO CUCAI'IONGA Staff Report DATE: June 27, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong. AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 86 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ABSTRACT: This is an informational item. The purpose is to introduce to the Planning Commission the draft design concept of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City adopted the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in 1987. A requirement of that Plan was to develop a Design Specification Plan for the Corridor. Last year, after several meetings and a field tour of the corridor, the Foothill Boulevard and Economic Development Task Fome made a recommendation to visually enhance it with street furniture and elements that unify the streetscape, promote cohesiveness, and preserve Historic Route 86. The Task Fome then directed staff to proceed with preparing a Design Specification Plan for Foothill Boulevard to achieve that goal. Staff has hired a consultant, Urban Design Studio, to prepare the Plan. Prior to preparing the Plan, staff obtained community input from Foothill Boulevard businesses through the Chamber of Commeme and properly owners, and the Foothill Focus Group that consisted of members of City staff and key business representatives. It is through community input that the Design Specification Plan evolved to be called Visual Improvement Plan. The draft design concept includes the eight Activity Centers as listed in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, a simulated Archibald Avenue intersection design with visual improvement, a vocabulary of street furniture, and Route 66 icons and art. On May 16, 2001, the Task Force reviewed the design concept and provided feedback to the consultant, who is currently working on revising the design to address its concerns. Staff is expecting the consultant to finalize the draft design for the two gateways at Grove and East Avenues very soon. Attached are draft minutes of the May 16, 2001 Task Force meeting. A goal of the Plan is to have enough specifications and details, for a designer to use in preparing construction plans. Another goal is for our consultant to investigate potential funding resources for installing the improvements to existing and improved sites. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN June 27, 2001 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and consider, and/or provide comments to staff. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF/jc Attachments: Draft Minutes of May 16, 2001, Task Force Meeting Draft Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (Provided under separate cover) (DRAFT) May 16, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meetinq - 4:00 P.M. A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Economic Development Task Fome was held on Wednesday, May 16, 2001, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Task Force Membem Present: Vice-Mayor Diane Williams, Council Member Paul Biane, and Planning Commissioner Para Stewart Task Fome Member Absent: Planning Commission Chairman Larry McNiel Staff Present: Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. Consultant Present; Bob Kleckner, Urban Design Studio. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1. REVIEW OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VIUSAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the purpose of the meeting was to present the design concept to members of the Task Force and obtain general direction from them. Bob Klekner, Urban Design Studio, gave an overview of the design concept for unifying the streetscape of Foothill Boulevard/Route 66. The Task Fome liked the design concept, which will provide a united character for the Boulevard; however, the Task Force raised the following issues and asked the consultant to address them: · The durability of the proposed pavers at the intersections. Other materials should be considered. · Consider the use of a different color instead of the proposed "brown" for streetlights and street light poles. · Provide unit cost for street furniture for review. · The Route 66 logo imprinted on street surface may create confusion for motorists. Consider reducing the size, changing the actual logo, and the location. · Banners must take into consideration of winds in the City. The Task Fome directed the Consultant to address the above items and bring them back for their review. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None. E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjoumed at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner ............ "':'~ Foofhi~ 8ou eYe, rd- H~s~oHc ~ou~e 66 ~," '~'" Foo~h~ Boulev¢~rd , H~s~or~c Route 66