HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/12/04 - Agenda Packet City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Gutierrez
and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation to Grace Curatalo in appreciation of her service to the City
and the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Presentation of Proclamations in recognition of the "Day of the Horse
2002."
3. Presentation to the City Council from the 4-H Club in recognition of the
Council's support of 4-H Youth Programs.
C..~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D.~. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Warrants, Register 11/13/02 thru 11/25/02, and Payroll 1
ending 11/17/02, for the total amount of $4,328,665.76.
2. Approval of the advertising for the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Phase 1B of 20
Community Facilities District 2001-01 to be funded from Acct. No.
16123035650/1442612-0.
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
2
RESOLUTION NO. 02-307 93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, FOR PHASE lB OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01,
CONSISTING OF STREET, STORM DRAIN,
SEWER, LANDSCAPING AND TRAFFIC
SIGNALS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
3. Approval of a Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area Fees
for the Local Chapter of the California Association of School 27
Transportation Official's School Bus Roadeo to be held on March 15,
2003.
4. Approval of a Bill of Sale between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Verizon California, Inc., for the conveyance of the underground conduit 29
and substructure facilities for Verizon as part of the Lower Hermosa
Avenue Phase II Improvements from 350 feet south of 8th Street to
north of the Metrolink Railroad Tracks north of 8th St.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-308 31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BILL OF SALE
BETWEEN THE CITY AND VERIZON
CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR THE CONVEYANCE
OF THE UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND
SUBSTRUCTURE FACILITIES FOR VERIZON
AS PART OF THE LOWER HERMOSA
AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS FROM
350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH
OF THE METROLINK TRACKS NORTH OF 8TM
STREET
5. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records 32
pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's
Records Retention Schedule and other applicable legal citations.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-309 33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH
ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH
IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE
LEGAL REFERENCES
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
3
6. Approval for authorization to allow Cingular Wireless to perform on-site
testing at the Rancho Cucamonga City Yard for the purpose of 98
reviewing the suitability of the property to install a Wireless Monopalm
Communications Tower.
7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for
Tract 15914, generally located on Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa 99
Avenue, north of Hillside Street, submitted by HER 22, LLC, and
release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement and
improvement Security accepted by City Council on January 3, 2001,
from Cai West Enterprises.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-310 102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 15914 AND
RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY
CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 3, 2001
8. Approval and authorization for a Contract for Renovation of Two (2)
Softball Fields at Red Hill Community Park, with Mariposa Horticultural 103
Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, (CO 02-137) in the amount of
$21,744.00, funded from Acct. No. 1120-305-5650/1222120-0.
9. Approval of a Contract for Relocation Services for the Civic Center
Rotunda Retrofit with Golden Eagle Moving Services, Inc. (CO 02-138), 104
of Upland, in the amount of $2,471.00, funded from Acct. No. 1025-001-
5300.
10. Approval of a Relinquishment Cooperative Agreement to accept control
and maintenance over Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) from Grove 106
Avenue to East Avenue, except that portion bounded by the
southbound 1-15 on-ramp and the northbound 1-15 off-ramp, to be
relinquished by the State of California to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
11. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the City 108
of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District (CO 02-139) for the design and construction of improvements to
the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System.
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
4
RESOLUTION NO. 02-311 '11 '1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND EXECUTING
THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO
THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
12. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Norris Repke, Inc.,
(CO 02-140), in the amount of $99,770 (plus 10% contingency) to 115
provide professional design services for the proposed Carnelian Storm
Drain Improvements from Vivero St. to 19th St. to be funded from Acct.
No. 11123035650/ 1291112-0, and approve an appropriation of
$109,747 to Account No. 11123035650/1291112-0 from the General
City Drainage Fund Balance.
13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Huls 117
Environmental Management, LLC, (CO 02-141) in an amount not to
exceed $44,000 to provide technical assistance in implementing a
commercial waste diversion program, to be funded from Acct. No.
10013135300, and approval of an appropriation of $44,000.00 to Acct.
No. 10013135300 from the Integrated Waste Management fund
balance.
14. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material
Bond, and cancel the Improvement Agreement for DR 00-66, submitted 119
by Pansiri and Surachai Wattanaporn (PSW, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 02-312 121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
CANCELLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, THE RELEASE OF THE
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND THE
RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND MATERIAL
BOND FOR DR 00-66
15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for DR 99-15 and
CUP 99-04, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and 122
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation.
16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tracts 13812 and. 124
14120-1, located on the south side of Summit Avenue, west of
Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Wealth V, LLC.
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
5
17. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements, release the Faithful 126
Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Landscape Improvements for Tract 15866, submitted by
APHRC24, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, located on the
southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-313 128
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15866 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA 129
BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
RESOLUTION NO. 02-314
131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS
AND DETERMINATIONS THAT
MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING
REGULATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 693 ARE REASONABLY
NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL
CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR
TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 693 (second reading) 134
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04,
15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24, 15.28 AND 15.32,
TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002 6
CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2001
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE,
INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, VOLUMES 1 AND 2," 1997 EDITION
INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO;
THE 2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE,
INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM
MECHANICAL CODE," 2000 EDITION; THE
2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE,
INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING
CODE," 2000 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL
APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2001
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE,
INCORPORATING THE "NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE," 1999 EDITION,
INCLUDING THE "UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PROVISIONS FOR
THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE," 1996
EDITION; ALL AS AMENDED BY THE
CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS
COMMISSION AND CONTAINED IN PARTS 2
THROUGH 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CODE OF
REGULATIONS; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR
THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS," 1997 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM
HOUSING CODE," 1997 EDITION; TOGETHER
WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS,
ADDITIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS, INCLUDING
FEES AND PENALTIES
2. CONSIDERATION OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR
HOUSING CHOICE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of 149
the federally required Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice,
which provides an overview of the laws, regulations, or other obstacles
that may affect accessibility to housing.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-315 '15'1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANALYSIS
OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING
CHOICE, A REVIEW OF THE FEDERALLY
REQUIRED ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO
FAIR HOUSING CHOICE, WHICH PROVIDES
AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAWS,
REGULATIONS, OR OTHER OBSTACLES
THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESSIBILITY TO
HOUSING
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
7
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. PRESENTATION ON THE CITY'S SILVER ANNIVERSARY
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE AND SPECIAL EDITION OF THE
GRAPEVINE (Oral)
I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral)
2. REPORT ON LOCAL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH 267
3. PRESENTATION REGARDING MOUNTAIN LIONS FROM A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND GAME (Oral)
4. CONSIDERATION OF FILLING COUNCIL VACANCY (Oral)
J.~. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
City Council Agenda
December 4, 2002
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on November 27, 2002, seventy-two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190624 11/13/2002 A G ELECTRIC CAR SPECIALISTS 1,141.76
AP - 00190625 11/13/2002 ABLETRONICS 18.24
AP- 00190625 11/13/2002 ABLETRONICS 73.29
AP- 00190625 11/13/2002 ABLETRONICS 42.02
AP - 00190625 11/13/2002 ABLETRONICS 105.06
AP - 00190626 11/13/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,088.00
AP - 00190627 11/13/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 46.16
AP- 00190628 11/13/2002 APWA 130.00
AP - 00190629 11/13/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 2,080.52
AP- 00190630 11/13/2002 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES 61.31
AP - 00190631 11/13/2002 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00
AP - 00190631 11/13/2002 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,647.50
AP - 00190632 11/13/2002 AUDIO EDITIONS 17.16
AP - 00190632 11/13/2002 AUDIO EDITIONS 33.74
AP- 00190633 11/13/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 210.00
AP - 00190633 11/13/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 2,549.29
AP - 00190634 11/13/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 19.40
AP - 00190635 11/13/2002 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL 14,508.11
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 62.71
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 696.30
AP- 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 12.57
AP- 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.50
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 1,131.65
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 360.90
AP- 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.59
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP - 00190636 11/13/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.93
AP- 00190637 11/13/2002 BRUCE, INGRID 133.32
AP- 00190638 11/13/2002 BUSINESS PRESS 59.00
AP - 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP- 00190639 11/13/2002 CENTEX HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190640 11/13/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 21.78
AP 00190640 11/13/2002 CERT1FIED AUTO CARE 1,813.76
AP 00190641 11/13/2002 CHAFFEYCOLLEGE 30.00
AP 00190641 11/13/2002 CHAFFEYCOLLEGE 15.00
AP 00190642 11/13/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 82.49
AP 00190643 11/13/2002 COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY 400.83
AP 00190644 11/13/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00190644 11/13/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 220.27
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 529.79
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 322.77
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 219.40
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.28
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 309.37
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 377.18
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: I Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 182.33
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 821.95
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 262.66
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 596.38
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 684.96
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 57.49
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 665.45
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.96
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 228.67
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 176.35
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 204.16
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.18
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 529.43
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 669.51
AP - 00190645 1t/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 56.87
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 484.11
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 504.71
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 747.79
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 664.36
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,998.03
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 125.88
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 266.78
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 563.42
AP - 00190645 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 256.84
AP - 00190646 11/13/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,120.00
AP - 00190647 11/13/2002 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 559.50
AP - 00190648 11/13/2002 DELLHIME, SIG 200.00
AP - 00190649 11/13/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,260.34
AP - 00190650 11/13/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 5,546.50
AP - 00190651 11/13/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 541.13
AP - 00190651 11/13/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 143.09
AP- 00190651 11/13/2002 EWlNG LRRIGATION PRODUCTS 154.99
AP - 00190651 11/13/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 366.60
AP - 00190651 11/13/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 305.01
AP - 00190652 11/13/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.92
AP - 00190652 11/13/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.18
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 429.00
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 429.00
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00
AP - 00190653 11/13/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP- 00190654 11/13/2002 FINSETH, ANITA 33.00
AP - 00190654 11/13/2002 FINSETH, ANITA 5.00
AP - 00190655 11/13/2002 GADABOUT TOURS INC 891.90
AP - 00190656 11/13/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 148.43
AP - 00190657 11/13/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 947.12
AP - 00190658 11/13/2002 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00
AP- 00190659 11/13/2002 GRAINGER, WW 654.32
AP - 00190659 11/13/2002 GRAINGER, WW 145.96
AP - 00190659 l 1/13/2002 GRAINGER, WW 309.29
AP- 00190659 11/13/2002 GRAINGER, WW 28.91
AP - 00190660 11/13/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 230.62
AP - 00190661 11/13/2002 HIRED GUN EXTERMINATING INC 2,152.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00]90662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 31.25
AP - 00190662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 194.24
AP - 00190662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 189.37
AP - 00190662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 257.26
AP - 00190662 11/13/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 54.96
AP - 00190663 11/13/2002 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 334.03
AP - 00190664 11/13/2002 HOME TOWN BUFFET 750.00
AP - 00190665 11/13/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 54.30
AP - 00190665 11/13/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 214.03
AP - 00190665 11/13/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 82.89
AP - 00190666 11/13/2002 IAAM 300.00
AP - 00190667 11/13/2002 ID BURR 242.44
AP - 00190668 11/13/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00190668 11/13/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00190668 11/13/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00190668 11/13/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP- 00190669 11/13/2002 INNOVAX GRAPHIX 5,250.00
AP - 00190670 11/13/2002 INTELLI TECH 79.74
AP - 00190670 11/13/2002 INTELLI TECH 196.90
AP- 00190671 11/13/2002 JIMENEZ, JOSE C 22.00
AP - 00190672 11/13/2002 KAMIN ASSOCIATES INC 126.99
AP - 00190673 11/13/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 740.78
AP- 00190674 11/13/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 7,524.00
AP - 00190675 11/13/2002 KRUSE, JOAN A 1,060.00
AP - 00190676 11/13/2002 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 126.81
AP - 00190677 11/13/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 436.65
AP - 00190677 11/13/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC -22.69
AP - 00190678 11/13/2002 LIE, STITCH 312.48
AP - 00190679 11/13/2002 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 323.14
AP- 00190680 11/13/2002 MAGIC SHOE REPAIR 212.00
AP - 00190681 11/13/2002 MCGRUFF SAFE KIDS 1,704.50
AP - 00190682 11/13/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 830.88
AP - 00190683 11/13/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 91.50
AP- 00190684 11/13/2002 NATIONS RENT 70.04
AP - 00190684 11/13/2002 NATIONS RENT 74.54
AP - 00190684 11/13/2002 NATIONS RENT 61.96
AP - 00190685 11/13/2002 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 7,050.00
AP - 00190686 11/13/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190687 11/13/2002 ODIN METROLOGY 547.73
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 17.94
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 32.04
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 209.53
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.59
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 13.79
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 13.49
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 288.73
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 85.93
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -25.92
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 85.00
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 51.58
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 25.79
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 53.30
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 51.18
User: ahnnsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 370.58
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 81.89
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 100.92
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 267.94
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 24.03
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.18
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.12
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 6.89
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 349.05
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 130.83
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 118.84
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 95.34
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 11.10
AP - 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 435.37
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 48.59
AP- 00190688 11/13/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 21.24
AP 00190689 11/13/2002 PACIFIC UTILITY EQUIPMENT CO 1,671.49
AP 00190690 11/13/2002 PARMA 100.00
AP 00190691 11/13/2002 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 395.58
AP 00190692 11/13/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 132.17
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 375.85
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 144.07
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 240.15
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 28.95
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 223.08
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 126.75
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 276.77
AP 00190693 11/13/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 470.77
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 204.80
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 27.50
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 253.55
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 364.92
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 544.34
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 141.93
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 895.60
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 317.50
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 74.18
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 797.91
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 47.22
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 47.22
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 541.69
AP - 00190693 11/13/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 352.90
AP - 00190694 11/13/2002 R AND R GARAGE DOOR SERVICE 826.50
AP - 00190695 11/13/2002 KALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 101.16
AP - 00190696 11/13/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEE ACTIVITY ] 13,000.00
AP - 00190697 11/13/2002 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 106.03
AP - 00190698 11/13/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 179.67
AP - 00190699 11/13/2~)02 RED WING SHOE STORE 124.56
AP - 00190700 11/13/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 403.25
AP - 00190701 11/13/2002 ROUCH, PETER A 35.00
AP - 00190702 11/13/2002 RUIZ, ERNEST R 49.45
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190703 11/13/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 103.10
AP - 00190704 11/13/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 149,000.00
AP - 00190705 11/13/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 25.00
AP - 00190706 11/13/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00
AP - 00190707 11/13/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 254.29
AP - 00190708 11/13/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 3,368.08
AP - 00190708 11/13/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 4,261.14
AP - 00190708 11/13/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 4,086.83
AP- 00190709 11/13/2002 SCBA 35.00
AP - 00190710 11/13/2002 SCHLACHTER, JUDY 7,000.00
AP - 00190711 11/13/2002 SMART AND FINAL 26.04
AP - 00190711 11/13/2002 SMART AND FINAL 57.39
AP - 00190712 11/13/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 94.97
AP - 00190712 11/13/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 214.34
AP- 00190713 11/13/2002 SOCIALTECH 1NC 250.00
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.80
AP - 00[90716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.00
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.58
AP - 00 i 90716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 164.72
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.17
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP- 00190716 ! 1/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.15
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 14.09
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.94
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.45
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.46
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.37
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.55
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNiA EDISON 14.38
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.36
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
AP 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.80
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.51
User: ahunsber - Ann Htmsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Por/rait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.97
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.34
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.09
AP - 00190716 11/I3/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.76
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.08
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.69
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.73
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 195.60
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,020.53
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.32
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.94
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 399.14
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.18
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 192.93
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.08
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.66
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.80
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.76
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.46
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.11
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.42
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.30
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.54
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 581.78
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,086.29
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.28
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.57
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.97
AP- 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.65
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 210.97
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.45
AP- 00190716 ! 1/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP - 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP ~ 00190716 11/13/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 183.10
AP - 00190717 11/13/2002 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 419.25
AP- 00190718 11/13/2002 STATE NET 275.00
AP - 00190718 11/13/2002 STATE NET 275.00
AP - 00190719 11/13/2002 SUN, THE 80.60
AP - 00190720 11/13/2002 TANGKAM INTERIORS 2,359.50
AP- 00190721 11/13/2002 TARGET 29.33
AP- 00190722 11/13/2002 TARGET 30.70
AP- 00190722 11/13/2002 TARGET 20.19
AP - 00190723 11/13/2002 TOLL BROS INC 700.00
AP - 00190724 11/13/2002 TRAINING NETWORK, THE 164.95
AP - 00190725 11/13/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 3,781.00
AP - 00190726 11/13/2002 TUCKER & SON INC, J G 349.07
AP- 00190727 11/13/2002 U T I 8.00
AP - 00190727 11/t3/2002 UTI 586.18
AP - 00190727 11/13/2002 U T I 50.31
AP - 00190727 11/13/2002 U T I 66.31
AP - 00190727 11/13/2002 U T I 301.86
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190727 11/13/2002 U T I 8.00
AP - 00190728 11/13/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,530.00
AP - 00190728 11/13/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 240.00
AP - 00190729 11/13/2002 UNITED TRAFFIC 355.58
AP - 00190730 11/13/2002 VEND U VENDING 69.70
AP - 00190730 11/13/2002 VEND U VENDING 142.64
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.81
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VEKIZON 23.19
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.24
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 415.50
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 58.76
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 38.90
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VE1LIZON 31.65
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 176.22
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 344.60
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 83.06
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 28.65
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 33.25
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 29.10
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 32.88
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 72.57
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 168.13
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 27.48
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 29.03
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 27.04
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 29.12
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 1,466.09
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 47.95
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 465.92
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 465.92
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 160.73
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 97.08
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 27.69
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 32.37
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 24.65
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 29.18
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 28.11
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 391.93
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 62.46
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 90.85
AP 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 42.63
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 270.18
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
-7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 90.85
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 28.11
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 43.86
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 129.00
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 29.02
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP - 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 1.27
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190732 11/13/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190733 11/13/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 300.49
AP- 00190734 11/13/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00
AP - 00190734 11/13/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00
AP - 00190735 11/13/2002 VILLAGE NURSERIES 156.24
AP - 00190736 11/13/2002 VISTA PAINT 427.89
AP - 00190736 11/13/2002 VISTA PAINT 106.97
AP - 00190737 11/13/2002 WALL STREET JOURNAL 49.50
AP - 00190738 11/13/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 166.55
AP - 00190738 11/13/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 50.02
AP - 00190738 11/13/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 339.46
AP - 00190739 11/13/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 1,060.80
AP- 00190740 11/13/2002 WAXIE 154.02
AP - 00190741 11/13/2002 WEST GROUP 150.85
AP - 00190742 11/13/2002 WESTERN PACIFIC PUMP SALES 519.60
AP- 00190743 11/13/2002 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 1,000.00
AP - 00190744 11/13/2002 WORLDCOM 707.47
AP - 00190745 11/13/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 132.57
AP - 00190746 11/13/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 32.94
AP - 00190747 11/13/2002 YNIQUEZ, TRACY 20.08
AP- 00190749 11/14/2002 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 001190765 11/14/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP- 00190768 11/14/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP - 00190787 11/14/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00
AP - 00t90790 11/14/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 7,697.89
AP- 00190795 11/14/2002 RCPFA 4,149.82
AP - 00190812 11/20/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 283.55
AP - 00190813 11/20/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 154.17
AP - 00190813 11/20/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 70.16
AP- 00190813 11/20/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 59.00
AP- 00190814 11/20/2002 ABLAC 294.06
AP- 00190815 11/20/2002 ABLETRONICS 158.63
AP - 00190817 11/20/2002 AMERICAN FUNDING ALLIANCE 24.81
AP- 00190818 11/20/2002 APHRCK LLC 1,000.00
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 49.64
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 34.87
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 152.04
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 997.84
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 67.24
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 71.80
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 448.35
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 189.05
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 64.26
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 61.50
User: ahimsber - Aim Himsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Re~ister
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 364.50
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 54.33
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 58.09
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 77.56
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 200.00
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 235.86
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 72.37
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 271.50
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 188.50
AP - 00190819 11/20/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 185.78
AP - 00190820 11/20/2002 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 862.50
AP - 00190821 11/20/2002 ASSI SECURITY 301.00
AP- 00190822 11/20/2002 ATHLETICA 1NC 21,650.00
AP - 00190823 11/20/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 825.00
AP - 00190823 11/20/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,550.00
AP - 00190823 11/20/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 112.50
AP - 00190823 11/20/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,957.50
AP - 00190823 11/20/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 825.00
AP - 00190825 11/20/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 35.21
AP - 00190825 11/20/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 25.86
AP - 00190826 11/20/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 2,115.00
AP - 00190826 11/20/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 2,223.00
AP - 00190827 11/20/2002 BILAL, CARINA 128.00
AP - 00190828 11/20/2002 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 3,249.74
AP- 00190829 11/20/2002 BRODART BOOKS 248.42
AP - 00190830 11/20/2002 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO 1NC, MIKE 344,838.70
AP - 00190831 11/20/2002 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1,614.11
AP - 00190832 11/20/2002 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38
AP - 00190834 11/20/2002 CARRIAGE ESTATES II LLC 123.00
AP - 001190835 11/20/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT 1NC. 220.00
AP - 00190836 11/20/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS 1NC 1,307.82
AP - 00190837 11/20/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 167.66
AP - 00190838 11/20/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72
AP - 00190839 11/20/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 1,230.40
AP - 00190839 11/20/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 532.80
AP - 00190840 11/20/2002 CHEVRON USA INC 172.56
AP - 00190842 11/20/2002 CHOSEN ONE ENTERTAINMENT 50.00
AP - 00190843 11/20/2002 CISNEROS, CORY 200.00
AP- 00190843 11/20/2002 CISNEROS, CORY 137.50
AP - 00190843 11/20/2002 CISNEROS, CORY 212.50
AP - 00190844 11/20/2002 CITY RENTALS 58.66
AP - 00190844 11/20/2002 CITY RENTALS 153.74
AP - 00190844 11/20/2002 CITY RENTALS 99.00
AP - 00190846 11/20/2002 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH 450.00
AP- 00190847 11/20/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50
AP - 00190848 11/20/2002 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 60.00
AP - 00190849 11/20/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 339.4I
AP - 00190850 11/20/2002 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 993.38
AP - 00190850 11/20/2002 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 1,000.00
AP - 00190852 11/20/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP - 00190853 11/20/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP- 00190854 11/20/2002 CPRS 125.00
AP- 00190855 11/20/2002 CSUS CIWMB 125.00
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 719.31
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
?
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 952.09
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,249.63
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 150.06
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,490.78
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.94
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 485.50
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 408.25
AP - 00190857 ! 1/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 971.07
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 276.41
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 987.11
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 421.64
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,144.70
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 440.18
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMO'NGA CO WATER DIST 1,100.41
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 20.96
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,104.17
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 57.01
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.94
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,008.02
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 811.65
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 537.23
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 88.11
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 149.36
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 726.52
AP - 00[90857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 158.84
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.60
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 768.13
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 99.67
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 630.89
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.43
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 196.84
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.64
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 561.72
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 951.06
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 809.95
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 430.91
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 94.77
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 99.92
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 592.26
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 307.31
AP 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 153.84
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 576.14
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.59
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 764.63
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.42
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 958.27
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 237.94
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,302.94
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 401.04
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 699.74
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 25.08
AP - 00190857 11/20/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 703.86
AP - 00190858 11/20/2002 D 3 EQUIPMENT 33.31
AP - 00190859 11/20/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 8,775.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
.Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190859 11/20/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 20,160.00
AP - 00190861 11/20/2002 DIAL SCALE CO INC 280.00
AP - 00190862 11/20/2002 DICK, ERIC 320.00
AP - 00190863 11/20/2002 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP - 00190863 11/20/2002 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP- 00190864 11/20/2002 DIRECTV 27.99
AP - 00190866 11/20/2002 EMBEE TECHNOLOGIES 2,760.00
AP - 00190868 11/20/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 410.81
AP - 00190868 11/20/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 136.22
AP - 001190869 11/20/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.99
AP - 00190869 11/20/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.90
AP - 00190869 11/20/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.92
AP - 00190869 11/20/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.62
AP- 00190869 11/20/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.35
AP - 00190870 11/20/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP - 00190870 11/20/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 546.90
AP- 00190870 11/20/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP - 00190870 11/20/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20
AP - 00190871 11/20/2002 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00
AP- 00190873 11/20/2002 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,145.00
AP - 00190874 11/20/2002 GENSEL, TRISHA 39.50
AP - 00190874 11/20/2002 GENSEL, TRISHA 10.50
AP- 00190875 11/20/2002 GRAINGER, WW 17.43
AP - 00190875 11/20/2002 GRAINGER, WW 228.25
AP- 00190875 11/20/2002 GRAINGER, WW 652.56
AP- 00190875 11/20/2002 GRAINGER, WW 128.23
AP - 00190876 11/20/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 260.38
AP - 00190877 11/20/2002 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50
AP - 00190878 1 t/20/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 83.51
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 94.71
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 116.10
AP- 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 253.69
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 167.26
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 201.72
AP- 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 39.16
AP-00190879 11/20/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF THE 145.75
AP-00190879 11/20/2002 HOMEDEPOT/GECF THE 4.91
AP- 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 102.05
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 54.97
AP - 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 105.22
AP- 00190879 11/20/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF THE 57.38
AP - 00190880 11/20/2002 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 398.32
AP - 00190881 11/20/2002 HOOPER, ALISON 750.00
AP - 00190882 11/20/2002 HOTTE, DONALD F 75.00
AP - 00190883 11/20/2002 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00
AP - 00190884 11/20/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 217.22
AP - 0(1190884 11/20/2002 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 61.43
AP - 00190886 11/20/2002 HRS USA 155.94
AP- 011190887 11/20/2002 HUANG, PRUDENCE 3,225.00
AP - 00190888 11/20/2002 HURLEY, ROGER 300.00
AP - 00190889 11/20/2002 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00190891 11/20/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 1,248.18
AP - 00190891 11/20/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 230.16
AP - 00190891 11/20/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 23.56
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190891 11/20/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 264.74
AP - 00190892 11/20/2002 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 940.12
AP - 00190892 11/20/2002 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 1,072.65
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 339.40
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 166.95
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 661.50
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 655.20
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 646.80
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 621.60
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 470.40
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,396.50
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 235.20
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 310.80
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 128.10
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 159.60
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 464.10
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 98.70
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 171.96
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 145.80
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 150.16
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 95.55
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 108.15
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 661.50
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 646.80
AP - 00190893 11/20/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 286.65
AP - 00190894 11/20/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 537.00
AP - 00190895 11/20/2002 JOHNSON, KATHY 3.80
AP - 00190896 11/20/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 2,474.21
AP - 00190897 11/20/2002 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 140.00
AP - 00190897 11/20/2002 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 70.00
AP - 00190899 11/20/2002 LAM, JACK 52.35
AP - 00190901 11/20/2002 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00190901 11/20/2002 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00190901 11/20/2002 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 73.84
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 38.95
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 226.13
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 169.56
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 81.92
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 547.60
AP - 00190903 11/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 57.95
AP - 00190903 1 t/20/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 90.03
AP - 00190904 11/20/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
AP - 00190906 11/20/2002 LUDWIG, CARL 318.50
AP - 00190907 11/20/2002 MANELA, ROSIE 44.17
AP - 00190908 11/20/2002 MARK III 1,000.00
AP - 00190908 11/20/2002 MARK III 2,000.00
AP - 00190908 11/20/2002 MARK III 2,294.00
AP - 00190909 11/20/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 106.75
AP - 00190910 11/20/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 1.79
AP- 00190910 11/20/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190910 11/20/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 33.91
AP - 00190911 11/20/2002 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 36.55
AP - 00190912 11/20/2002 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 40,193.78
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190912 11/20/2002 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 17,059.91
AP ~ 00190912 11/20/2002 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 21.76
AP - 00190913 11/20/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,520.57
AP - 00190914 11/20/2002 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 217.6I
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 235.09
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 71.52
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 132.63
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 51.59
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS - 190.24
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 11.20
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.59
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 266.39
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 74.28
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.98
AP - 00190915 11/20/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 109.08
AP - 00190916 11/20/2002 NATIONA'L DEFERRED 24,550.42
AP- 00190917 11/20/2002 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 103.44
AP - 00190918 11/20/2002 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00
AP - 00190919 11/20/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190919 11/20/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP- 00190919 11/20/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190919 11/20/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190920 11/20/2002 OCHOA, JOSE A 500.00
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 325.94
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -12.89
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.85
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 198.45
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 35.65
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 74.84
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -30.51
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 35.38
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -7.43
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.38
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 27.98
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 64.14
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 94.42
AP - 0(}190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 57.99
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 4.46
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 43.08
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 21.40
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 175.00
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 35.36
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.23
AP - 01)190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.47
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 189.09
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 36.50
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 15.64
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 24.43
AP - 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 14.49
AP- 00190921 11/20/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -20.30
AP - 00190922 11/20/2002 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35
AP- 00190923 11/20/2002 OMNITRANS 17.50
AP - 00190924 11/20/2002 ORCHARD PLAZA THERAPY CLINIC 327.50
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.22
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.77
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 49.12
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 134.82
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.82
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 83.40
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 24.52
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 29.29
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 190.14
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 57.08
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 87.70
AP- 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.18
AP - 001190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 86.12
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 63.52
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 90.41
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.30
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 14.52
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 27.21
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 23.77
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.22
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.57
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 49.62
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 44.31
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.05
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 13.22
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 20.62
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.29
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.72
AP - 00190925 11/20/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 212.99
AP - 00190926 11/20/2002 PACIFIC COMMUNITIES 300.00
AP - 00190927 11/20/2002 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 29.09
AP - 00190928 11/20/2002 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 4,417.75
AP - 00190929 11/20/2002 PACIFICA SALES 455.00
AP- 00190929 11/20/2002 PACIFICA SALES 216.00
AP - 00190930 11/20/2002 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 49,998.93
AP - 00190931 11/20/2002 PEP BOYS 6.45
AP - 00190931 11/20/2002 PEP BOYS 25.83
AP- 00190931 11/20/2002 PEP BOYS 12.29
AP - 00190933 11/20/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 1,749.86
AP - 00190934 11/20/2002 PITNEY BOWES 306.44
AP- 00190935 11/20/2002 PMI 1,341.76
AP - 00190936 11/20/2002 POMONA iNLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 918.00
AP - 00190937 11/20/2002 PROJECT SISTER 911.80
AP - 00190938 11/20/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00190938 11/20/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00190938 11/20/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00190939 11/20/2002 QU1NTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00190940 11/20/2002 R C TEXACO STAR MART 23.55
AP - 00190941 11/20/2002 RANCHO 2002 LLC 46.00
AP - 00190942 11/20/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 2,500.00
AP - 00190942 11/20/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00
AP - 00190942 11/20/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00
AP - 00190943 11/20/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,000.00
AP - 00190943 11/20/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAiT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
/¢
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11 / 13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190944 11/20/2002 REGENCY HOMES INC 250.00
AP - 00190945 11/20/2002 RE1NHARDTSEN, DEBKA 282.50
AP - 00190946 11/20/2002 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00
AP - 00190946 11/20/2002 RI-I TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00
AP - 00190947 11/20/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 81.20
AP- 00190948 11/20/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 58.19
AP - 00190948 11/20/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 152.12
AP - 00190949 11/20/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 95.36
AP - 00190950 11/20/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP - 00190951 11/20/2002 RMA GROUP 9,560.00
AP - 00190952 11/20/2002 RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 1,000.00
AP - 00190953 11/20/2002 SAFETY IMAGES 170.93
AP - 00190953 11/20/2002 SAFETY IMAGES 432.27
AP - 00190954 11/20/2002 SAN BERN AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES 308.70
AP - 00190955 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00
AP - 00i90956 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68
AP - 00190957 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 13,333.34
AP - 00190957 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,040,115.66
AP - 00190957 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 15,320.83
AP - 00190957 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,245,800.89
AP - 00190957 11/20/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 23,704.17
AP - 00190959 11/20/2002 SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF 15.00
AP- 00190960 11/20/2002 SCCCA 30.00
AP- 00190960 11/20/2002 SCCCA 30.00
AP- 00190960 11/20/2002 SCCCA 90.00
AP- 00190960 11/20/2002 SCCCA 30.00
AP- 00190961 11/20/2002 SCLLN INC 250.00
AP - 00190962 11/20/2002 SENSATIONAL BODY SCENTS 23.00
AP - 00190964 11/20/2002 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,327.48
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 19,429.89
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 4,212.90
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 14,992.80
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CAL1F EDISON CO 12,120.96
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,868.67
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 44.24
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 34,772.47
AP - 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 181.47
AP- 00190966 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,727.75
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 456.81
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 9,615.06
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,956.09
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 5,417.39
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 28.87
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 49.55
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 55.43
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 61.66
AP - 00190967 11/20/2002 SO CAL1F EDISON CO 4,714.75
AP- 00190968 l 1/20/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 998.83
AP - 00190968 11/20/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 130.48
AP - 00190968 11/20/2002 SO CAL1F GAS COMPANY 102.20
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.52
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.26
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.85
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.77
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.84
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.00
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.47
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.91
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66
AP - 001190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.83
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.76
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 672.68
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 825.75
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.41
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.20
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.87
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.47
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.08
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.17
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 164.85
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.07
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.93
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.66
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.05
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,733.32
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 220.03
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.58
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.43
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.09
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.83
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.85
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.30
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.48
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.16
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.53
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.85
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.58
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10
AP- 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.60
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190971 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.27
AP - 00190972 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 51.00
AP - 00190973 11/20/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TURFGRASS CNCL 650.00
AP - 00190974 11/20/2002 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 250.00
AP - 00190974 11/20/2002 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 275.00
AP - 00190974 11/20/2002 SPAIN JR, WILLIAM V 275.00
AP - 00190976 11/20/2002 ST PETER AND ST PAUL CHURCH 75.00
AP - 00190976 11/20/2002 ST PETER AND ST PAUL CHURCH 50.00
AP- 00190977 11/20/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10,590.81
AP - 00190978 11/20/2002 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP- 00190979 11/20/2002 STEKICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00190979 11/20/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP- 00190979 11/20/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00190979 11/20/2002 STERICYCLE [NC 52.50
AP - 00190979 11/20/2002 STERICYCLE 1NC 96.98
AP - 00190980 11/20/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00
AP - 00190981 11/20/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 7,012.42
AP - 01)190982 11/20/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 7,063.00
AP - 00190984 11/20/2002 LrNITED PARCEL SERVICE 19.96
AP - 00190985 11/20/2002 UNITED WAY 623.32
AP - 00190986 11/20/2002 UPLAND KINGDOM HALL 1,000.00
AP - 01)190987 11/20/2002 VAN DAELE COMMUNITIES LLC 239.50
AP - 00190989 11/20/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 154.39
AP- 00190989 11/20/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 64.43
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VEKIZON 55.36
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 36.13
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 42.63
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.79
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 176.35
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.86
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 89.46
User: ahtmsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 225.40
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 35.41
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERiZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 27.69
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 29.64
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 27.69
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 43.79
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 22.64
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VE1LIZON 22.64
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 38.12
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 38.12
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 89.46
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 28.65
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 90.83
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 69.94
AP - 00190991 11/20/2002 VEPdZON 67.89
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 23.48
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VEILIZON 60.88
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 40.51
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 27.69
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 125.96
AP- 00190991 11/20/2002 VERIZON 31.30
AP- 00190992 11/20/2002 VERIZON 74.90
AP - 00190993 11/20/2002 VERIZON 1,650.00
AP - 00190994 11/20/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00
AP - 00190995 11/20/2002 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANANGER VPM 500.00
AP - 00190995 11/20/2002 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANANGER VPM 500.00
AP - 01)190997 11/20/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP- 00190998 11/20/2002 WAXIE 224.38
AP- 00190998 11/20/2002 WAXIE 681.36
AP- 00190998 11/20/2002 WAXIE 235.22
AP - 00190998 11/20/2002 WAXIE 685.11
AP- 00190998 11/20/2002 WAXIE 501.85
AP - 00190999 11/20/2002 WEST END YMCA/WEST END KIDS CLUB 3,260.25
AP - 00191000 11/20/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 42,725.00
AP - 00191000 11/20/2002 WlLLDAN ASSOCIATES 2,377.50
AP - 00191001 11/20/2002 WILSON, MANYA 21.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 10,427.98
AP- 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 39.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION -13.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 360.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 90.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION -30.00
AP - 00191002 11/20/2002 XEROX CORPORATION -390.00
AP - 00191003 11/21/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 1,957.35
AP - 00191003 11/21/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 2,146.72
AP - 00191003 11/21/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS 1NC. 2,728.67
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:47:1
/5;
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
11/13/2002 through 11/25/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00191004 11/21/2002 FREDPACKSEN, CHR/STINE 68.50
AP - 00191005 11/21/2002 LUDWIG, CARL 250.00
AP - 00191006 11/21/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 2,500.00
AP - 00191007 11/21/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00
AP - 00191007 11/21/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 200.00
AP - 00191008 11/21/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 222.01
AP - 00191009 11/25/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 928.00
AP - 00191010 11/25/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,032.50
Total for Check ID AP: 3,586,514.03
Total for Entity: 3,586,514.03
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 11/25/200
Report:CK AGENDA_PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porta'ait Layout Time: 10:47:1
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENCI~EI~i~ING DE PAI~T~E N T
DA'I~: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY' Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECt: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE
INVITING BIDS" FOR PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
2001-01 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 15123035650/1442612-0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice
Inviting Bids" for Phase 1B of Community Facilities District 2001-01.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Community Facilities District 2001-01 was formed in August of 2001 to provide for the
construction of the infrastructure relative to Tentative Tract Map 15947 and the regional
mall site. The design package of plans, specification and estimates for the second phase
of construction are substantially complete.
Phase lB construction will include the following:
· Day Creek Boulevard from Church Street to Foothill Boulevard
· Church Street from Day Creek Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue
· South side of Base Line Road from Day Creek Boulevard to Victoria Park Lane
· Main distribution/collection system for water and sewer
· Day Creek Boulevard storm drain from south of Church Street to Day Creek Channel
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, PHASE 1 B
December 4, 2002
Page 2
· Victoria Garden Lane storm drain from Chumh Street to Day Creek Boulevard
· Arbor Way north of Church Street
· Sewer main in Victoria Gardens Lane, from Church Street to Day Creek Boulevard
· Landscaping and irrigation for Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Park
Lane and Base Line Road
submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:MEP:Is
VICINITY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01
EXHIBIT A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR PHASE lB OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01,
CONSISTING OF STREET, STORM DRAIN, SEWER,
LANDSCAPING AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS, IN SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001-01, which said advertisement shall be substantially
in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEAI.F.D BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga
will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or
before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 18, 2003, sealed bids or proposals for "PHASE
lB OF COMMLrN1TY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT 2001-01".
pREVAII.ING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
RESOLUTION NO.
December 4, 2002
Page 2
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
· mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship,
RESOLUTION NO.
December 4, 2002
Page 3
San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day
during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight
(8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said
bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him,
and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond
shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between
the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all
applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including
RESOLUTION NO.
December 4, 2002
Page 4
but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000
et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjuD', that the information being provided is true and
correct.
The work is to be done 'in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Copies of the plans and specifications will be made available at the office of
the City Engineer. They will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
payment of $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non
refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non
reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and
overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor
may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia.
Dated this 4th day of December, 2002.
Publish Dates: December 24, 2002 and December 31, 2002
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 4th day of December 2002.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
DATE: December 4, 2002
SUBJECT: Approval of Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area Fees for
the Local Chapter of the California Association of School Transportation
Official's School Bus Roadeo to be held on March 15, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached request from the
California Association of School Transportation Officials (CASTO) to conduct a School
Bus Roadeo on March 15, 2003 (move-in date is March 14, 2003), at the Epicenter
Special Event Area.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
CASTO, Chapter 1 is a non-profit organization that has used the Rancho Cucamonga
Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot for the past four years to conduct its local Roadeo in
preparation for the State Championship Roadeo sponsored by the State Department of
Education. The statewide event normally occurs in late April, early May each year.
CASTO, Chapter 1 consists of school transportation directors, mechanics, driver
instructors and school bus drivers from the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.
The purpose of the local Roadeo is to provide participants with an opportunity to
practice their school bus driving and maneuvering skills. There normally are between
75-80 school bus drivers who participate in the Roadeo. The course for the Roadeo is
set up during the late afternoon of March 14th. The Roadeo will be a morning to mid-
afternoon event, ending at approximately 3:00 p.m. on the afternoon of March 15, 2003.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve this request based upon the following
criteria: the historical association between this activity and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, CASTO's affiliation with the State Department of Education, its attention to
CIIY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF r~EQUEST FOR W~VER OF EPICENTER EXPANDED PARKING LOT FEES FOR THE LOCAL
CHAPTER OF THE CASTO's SCHOOL BUS r~OADEO TO BE HELD ON MARCH ] 5, 2003
the public safety requirements for school bus drivers and the public service it provides
members of our community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
CASTO is requesting that the City Council waive the base rental of $3,000. In years
past there has been no maintenance costs associated with this event. It is anticipated
that there would be no maintenance expenses again this year, CASTO would be
required to provide comprehensive public liability insurance coverage in the amount of
$1 million dollars for the event.
Community Services Director
h~MM$ER~AC~ur~i~&B~ards~Ci~y~u~i~$taffRep~rt~2tCA$T~S~h~Bu~R~ade~12~4.~2.d~c
-2-
R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N GA
III
~ N G INI~EI~ IN G D E DAI~T ~IE N T
Staff Report
December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A BILL OF SALE BETWEEN THE CiTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF
THE UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE FACILITIES FOR
VERIZON AS PART OF THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE I1
IMPROVEMENTS FROM 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH OF THE
METROLINK RAILROAD TRACKS NORTH OF 8TM STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Bill of Sale
between the City and Verizon California, Inc., and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the City
Engineer to sign the Bill of Sale, for the conveyance of the underground conduit and substructure
facilities for Verizon as part of the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements from 350 feet
south of 8"~ Street to north of the Metorlink Railroad Tracks north of 8~ Street.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS:
The City's project to install conduit in conjunction with the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II project
is nearing completion. Verizon has a requirement that the City convey to them the rights to their
portion of the conduits before they will install their lines in the conduit. The attached Bill of Sale will
convey those rights to Verizon and relieve the City of any future maintenance responsibility for
those conduits and related facilities.
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:Is
Attachments: Vicini~ Map/Resolution
24T~ CT
BNSFP-.R.
GTH ~T
4TH ST
LOCATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
s/o OTH ST. TO N/O Jfn'ROLUqK TRt~ ~q/O 8TH ST
VICINITY MAP
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
BILL OF SALE BETWEEN THE CITY AND VERIZON
CALIFORNIA INC. FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF THE
UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE
FACILITIES FOR VERIZON AS PART OF THE LOWER
HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS FROM
350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH OF THE
METROLINK TRACKS NORTH OF 8TM STREET
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its
consideration a Bill of Sale between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Verizon
California Inc. for the conveyance of the underground conduit and substructure facilities
for Verizon as part of the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements from 350 feet
south of 8th Street to north of the Metrolink tracks north of 8th Street; and
WHEREAS, the Bill of Sale will transfer title of the facilities over to Verizon.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves that said Bill of Sale be hereby approved and the City
Engineer is hereby authorized to sign the Bill of Sale on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator %
SUBJECT: Destruction of City Records
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution
authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government
Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other
applicable legal citations.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required
retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final
disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by
the Department representatives, the Department Heads and the City Attorney.
DMY
(Attachments as noted)
Resolution No. 02-*** Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 02-*~(~ ~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO
LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER
APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the following
departments and divisions have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal,
State and local statutes;
City Council City Clerk
Administration Admin Svcs/Admin
Personnel Admin Svcs/Treasury
Engineering/Traffic/Design Engineering/Admin
Finance Community Services
Business Licensing Risk Management
M.I.S. Building & Safety
Facilities Maint/Yard Planning
Library G.I.S. / Special Districts
and
WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer
required for public or private purposes:
WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage
space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records
Management Policy; and
WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been
approved for destruction by the City Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION '1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy
those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Resolution No. 02-*** Page 2
SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in
full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular
meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of December, 2002.
Executed this 5th day of December, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Resolution No. 02-*** Page 3
EXHIBIT 'A'
Records Destruction Authorizations for the foilov, ing
Departments / Divisions
City Council
Administration
City Clerk
Finance
Personnel
Admin Svcs/Treasury
Admin Svcs/Admin
G.I.S. / Special Districts
Business Licensing
Risk Management
M.I.S.
Facilities Maint./Yard
Planning
Building & Safety
Community Services
Engineering/Admin
Engineering/Traffic Design
Library
.Notification Number 10/21/2002
~". Destruction Notification Report
117 15~05:29
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4110 CITY CO~CIL
Bill to Name: 4110
Records Coordinator: ;~=le~==~w~ Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2005
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Archive 2294 7011.1 MayOr and CoUncil Correspondence 01/01/1997 12/31/1998 12/31/2002 09-01-02 2
Box Contents: Mayor/Council Corresp 1997 & 1998
E = Excluded
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out -- 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 1
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date Donna Kendrena, Exec. Ass't. Date Jack Lam, City Manager ~ Date Ji~Markman, City Attorney
Page I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: City Manager (4122) Requestor: Donna Kendrena
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have been stored in the Administration Department and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the semi-annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records /
Record Title Code from Records Retention Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.2 - Policies & Precedents All that were superseded in calendar year 2000
11300.3 - United Way Campaign Calendar year 1999
12050.1 - Cable TV & Radio (general) Calendar year 1999
12060.1 - Ambulance Service Operating Permits All that expired in 1991
13010.7 - Monthly Crime Reports Calendar year 2000
15010.1 - Inter-Governmental Agencies All where the City Official's term as a representative to
the applicable agency ended in 2000
2060. l - Annual reports of agencies and organizations All dated prior to 1/1/2001
(other than City &Rancho Cucamonga)
7012.1 - Council/Commission Contact Forms Calendar year 1998
Department Approval x..City 3~torney Approy'41 (if required)
Signature Date Signatu~ / Date
Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
118 Destruction Notification Report
15:19=22
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4122 CITY MANAGER
Rill to Name: 4122
Records Coordinator: KENDRENA, DONNA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2015
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETL~RN TKE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Archive 1896 1020.4 Newspaper Articles 01/01/1997 01/03/1999 01/03/2002 V3-02-03 2
E = Excluded
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 1
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date Duane Baker, Asst. to City Mgr Date Jack Lam, City Manager Date Ji~a~kman, City Attorney
Page I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Personnel (at~'~ Requestor: Chris Pittenger
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
5020.5 - Salary & Classification Surveys All that became inactive prior to January, 2001
5030.3 - Job Descriptions All that were superseded prior to January, 2001
Departm~e.e.~ A~ x~ftorney Ap/pro~/~ (if required)
Signature Date ~ignamre~.~~. ~ D'ate
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
119 Destruction Notification Report
15~20:53
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4124 PERSONNEL
Bill to Name: 4124
Records Coordinator: Chris Pittenger Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2411
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo Justifying the hold.
RETUP-N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Shred 2020 5010.2 Individual Personnel Folders 01/01/1996 12/31/1997 12/31/2002 13-02-02 3
Box Contents: Inactive Employee Files '96, '97 (A-M)
.~[] Shred 2021 5010.2 Individual Personnel Folders 01/01/1996 12/31/1997 12/31/2002 13-02-02 1
Box Contents: Inactive Employee Files '96, '97 (N-Z)
E = Excluded
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out ~ 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date Chris Pitten~ar, Personnel Svc Date Larry Temple, Date J~ar~man, City Attorney
Page I
120 Destruction Notification Report
15:29=33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name: 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator: MORRISON, PAT Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2579
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RET%rR~ THE LIST TO T~LE RECOPd)S DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space~
J~' ~ Shre/d 1927 2050.2 Dept'l. Budget Working Papers 01/01/1987 12/31/1996 **HOLD** 12/31/1998 12-02-02 4
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 11/04/1999 TO: Ingrid Bruce
Box Contents: SCE Invoices 1987 - 1996
FOLDER Description
1 SCE Invoices / Cost Allocation Reports 1988-1996 01/01/1988 01/30/1998 Dept'l. Budget Working Pa
2 ***** SOX IS FULL ***** 01/01/1987 12/31/1996 Dept'l. Budget Working Pa
Sh~ ' 772~--~ 4012.1 District Files - by District # 07/01/1990 07/30/1990 **HOLD** 07/30/2000 10-02-03 6
B0x0
HOLD
*~FRDL~_* Pl~on this box Date: 07/15/1999 TO: Ingrid Bruce
Box Contents: SLD 1-8 (Payments - 1990/91)
FOLDER Description
1 SLD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 FY 90/91 1ST & 2ND PAYMENTS 07/01/1990 07/30/1991 District Files - by Distr
D S~ ~~012.1 District Files - by District # 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 **HOLD** 12/31/2000 03-01-01
*
HOLD~ pl~e on this box Date: 07/19/1999 To: Ingrid Bruce
Date fn~d Bru~, Spcl Dist Superv Date Larry Tample,6~Ad~ Svcs Dir Date ~m'Markman, City Attorney
Page I
Notification Number
120 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
15:29:33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name: 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator: MORRISOM, PAT Mall Code: Phons: (909)477-2700 ext:2579
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECOP. DS DIVISION BY NO%rEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Box Contents: Tax rolls-various Districts 85/86-89/90
FOLDER Description
1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TAX ROLLS 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files - by Distr
2 TAX YEAR 1985/86 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
3 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 ( SLD1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
4 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 ( SLD2 01/01/1989 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
5 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 ( SLD3 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
6 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT MO. 1 ( SLD4 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
7 L~NDSCAPE MAINTAINANCE DISTRICT NO.1 LMD1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
8 LANDSCAPE MAINTAINANCE DISTRICT NO.1 LMD2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
9 LANDSCAPE MAINTAINANCE DISTRICT NO.1 LMD4 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
10 LANDSCAPE MAINTAINANCE DISTRICT NO.1 LMDS 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
11 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1 ( AD 82-1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
12 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 ( AD 84-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
13 PARK DISTRICT 85 PD ( PD 85 ) 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
14 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84-1 CFD 84-1 ) 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
15 TAX YEAR 87/88 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
16 SLD 1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
17 SLD 2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
18 SLD 3 01/01/1988 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
19 SLD 4 01/01/1989 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
20 SLD 5 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
21 LMD 3 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
Date -f~r~Eruce, ~/pcl Dist Superv Date Larry Temple,~m Svcs Dir Date Ji~ Markman, City Attorney
Page 2
Notification Number
120 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
15:29:33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name: 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator: MORRISON, PAT Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2579
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RBTu~,N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
22 AD 82-1R 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files - by Distr
23 AD 82-1R 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
24 AD 84-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
25 AD 86-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
86 CFD 84-1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
27 TAX YEAR 1986/87 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
28 SLD 1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
29 SLD 2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
30 SLD 3 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
31 SLD 4 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
32 LMD 1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
33 LMD 2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
34 LMD 4 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
35 LMD 5 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
36 PD 85 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
37 AD 82-1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
38 AD 84-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
39 TAX Y~2LR 1989/90 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
40 SLD 1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
41 SLD 2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
42 SLD 3 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
43 SLD 4 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
Page 3
Notification Number 10/21/2002
120 Destruction Notification Report
15=29=33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name= 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator= MORRISON, PAT Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=2579
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
48 SLD 6 01/01/1989 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
46 LMD 1 01/01/1985 12/81/1990 District Files by Distr
47 LMD 2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
48 L~D 3 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
49 LMD 5 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
50 LMD 6 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
51 PD 85 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
52 AD 82-1R 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
53 AD 84-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
54 AD 86-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
55 CFD 84-1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
56 CFD 88-1 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
57 CFD 88-2 01/01/1985 12/31/1990 District Files by Distr
-~O~*~-'Bl~d on this box Date: 08/12/2002 TO: Ingrid Bruce
I//1~/1~ I( ~ ~../~ Itlllql~ I ' I~11~to~ I
Date I~ Bruce~/Sp~l Dist Sup~rv Date Lar~ T~ple,(~ Svcs Dir Date Jim, Matin, City Attorney
Page
Notification Number
120 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
15:29:33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name: 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator: MORRISON, PAT Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext,2579
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH hox you authorize to
he destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of BACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECOP. DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Box Contents: SLD Files 1-8
FOLDER Description
i ***** SOX IS FULL ***** 01/01/1977 12/31/1991 District Files - by Distr
[]~~.~ %[ J - by 9 01/01/1977 12/31/1991 **HOLD** 12/31/2001 12-02-03 4
4012.1
District
~ S~a-- ~ \~,/4012.1 District Files - by District # 01/01/1977 12/31/1991 **HOLD** 12/31/2001 12-02-03 3
*~J~l~ced on this box Date: 08/12/2002 To: Ingrid Bruce
BOX Contents: Landscape Districts 1-3
FOLDER Description
1 ***** BOX IS FULL ***** 01/01/1977 12/31/1991 District Files - by Distr
Date Ing~id~ruce, S~ Dist Superv Date Larry Temple,C-~A~m Svcs Dir Date J~ Markman, City Attorney
Page 5
Notification ~umber 10/21/2002
120 Destruction Notification Report
15:29:33
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Bill to Name: 4131 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Records Coordinator: MORRISON, PAT Nail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2579
!The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
~/~ ~hred 729 4012.1 District Files - by District # 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 07/30/2002 10-03-03 6
~TM BOX Contents: SLD 1-8, LMD 1-4 (Payments 1991/92)
--FOLDER Description
i 1ST AND 2ND PAYMENTS 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
2 SLD 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, AND 8 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
3 LMD 1,2,3A,3B AND 4 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
· Shred 730 4012.1 District Files - by District # 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 07/30/2002 10-03-03 5
x Contents: Payments 1991/92 - Various
LDER Description
1 1ST AND 2ND PAYEMENTS 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
2 PD 85 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
3 AD 82-1R, 84-2, AND 86-2 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
4 CFD 84-1, 88-1, AND 88-2D+L 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
5 LMD 5,6,7, AND 8 07/01/1991 07/30/1992 District Files - by Distr
Date IngzZ{d Bru~, Spcl Dist Superv Date Larry T~pl~ Dir ' Date Jt Markman, City A~torney
Page 6
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 6
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Admin Services/Treasury (4140) Requestor: Sandy Ramirez
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
4030.9 - Wire Transfer Confirmations Calendar year 2000
7040.5 - Finance Vault Key Log Calendar year 2000
Department Approval ~'(~ty)t~r~ney ApprO[va~/~ required~ /
Signature - (~ate Signature ~-~-~_~W' Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Admin Services/Admin (4150) Requestor: Pam Mara
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual AdVantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (MoP/r)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
12050.5 - Mail Processing Calendar year 2000
C~kty At~rney Apprlva~ required) /
S'~gnature ~ ~ Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification ~,mher 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
121 15=45:53
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4150 ~DMIN SBRVICES/ADMIN
Bill to Name: 4150
Records Coordinator= MARA, PAM Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=2402
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
R~Tu~.N THE LIST TO T~E RECOP. DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
lO S~red 2501 9010.6 Meet and Confer 01/01/1995 12/31/1997 12/31/2002 02-01-01 4
E = Excluded
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elglbile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted ~ 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 1
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Page I
REQUEST FOR RECORDS
Department: (3rq[w-,_ ~(.~ Date:
Requested By/Title: ~)(?~-~ ~ 0,~c~ Phone Ext:
Request Approved By (Departmental Records Coordinator):
Record Subject Title & Description:
(NOTE: Refer to your Department Inventory to determine the Box Number and Record
Center location of your file.)
Box Number: r-~.--~Ol Record Center Space: 0c-)- -~I -0 ) - ~
Records Given to: f~6~v-~ ~ ~ Date:
Expected Return Date: Actual Return Date:
~ Record~_b~ D~te:
(..- · )
Page I of 1
Young, Diane
From: Rivera. George
Sent: Monday. November 18, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Young. Diane
Cc: Victorino Valerie
Subject: RE: Destruction of box 2301
Please consider this as our request to remove from Box #2301 and retain beyond the approved retention period
the Becker and Bell study materials and correspondence. These records are being used occasionally as a
reference when doing salary surveys with our comparison cities.
Thank you for your assistance and we apologize for any inconvenience.
George S. Rivera
..... Original Message .....
From: Young, Diane
Sent-' Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:42 AM
To; Rivera, George
Cc.' Victorino Valerie
Subject; FW: Destruction of box 2301
Importance.' High
2nd request .....
..... Original Message .....
From: Young, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:35 AM
To: Rivera, George
Cc-' Victorino Valerie
Subject: RE: Destruction of box 2301
Hi George -
Please prepare a memo to me requesting that these records be removed from Box
#2502 and returned to the Department, specifying the reason that they need to be held
beyond the approved retention period. I will need that as part of the permanent record.
Thx -
Diane
..... Original Message .....
From: Victorino Valerie
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Young, Diane
Subject: Destruction of box 2301
Good morning Diane. I spoke with George and he needs to continue to refer to the Becket & Bell study
materials and correspondence. We would like to keep it indefinitely, but the rest of the box is not needed.
Please refer to him if you have any other questions! Thanks, Valerie
11/18/2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Finance (4151) Requestor: Tamara Layne
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
4011.6 - Master Chart of Accounts All that have been superseded prior to 1/1/2001
4030.7 - Dept. Sign-off List for Payroll Calendar year 2000
i~o equired)
Department Approval rney Appr~0'~/r
Signature ~ W t Date Date
Council Approval Date ! Resolution it Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
122 15:54:32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Acco%u%ts Payable 07/01/1995 12/31/1995 12/31/2002 07-06-03 2
Shred 2336 4010.1
Box Contents: Demand Warrant Register (7/95-12/95)
Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 03/19/1997 08/20/1997 08/20/2002 03-02-03 3
Shred 2161 4030.6
Box Contents: A/P Canceled Checks
FOLDER Description
1 Check #'s 114700 thru 119399 03/19/1997 08/20/1997 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA
2 Dated 3/19/1997 thru 8/20/1997 03/19/1997 08/20/1997 cancelled Checks {Non-RDA
Shred 2351 4030.6 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 03/20/1~97 11/18/1997 11/13/2002 03-03-03 5
Box Contents: Payroll Canceled Checks (3/97 - 11/97)
FOLDER Description
1 Check Numbers 119900 125599 03/20/1997 11/13/1997 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA
hred 1395 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Flles 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 07/08/2002 06-03-01 2
Date Tamara Layne,~nc~ Officer Date Larry T e Date ~ Markman, City Attorney
Page i
NotificationNumber 10/21/2002
122 Destruction Notification Report
15:54:32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMA~A Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RRTu~N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code {Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
FOLDER Description
1 DAILY CASH RECEIPTS 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
2 DATED: 06-16-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
3 06-17-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
4 06-21-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
5 06-22-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
6 06-23-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
7 06-24-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
8 06-28-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
9 06-29-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
10 06-30-93 06/18/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
11 07-01-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
12 07-06-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
13 07-07-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
14 07-08-93 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
15 RECEIPT # 4767 THRU 5595 06/16/1993 07/08/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
red 1396 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 07/12/1993 08/12/1999 08/12/2002 06-03-01 3
FOLDER Description
1 DAILY CASE RECEIPTS 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
2 DATED: 07-12-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
~ 3 07-13-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
Date Tam~Layne, Finance Officer Date Larry T Date ~ Markman, City Attorney
Page 2
Notification Number
122 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
15:54:32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYRE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo Justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
4 07-14-93 07/.12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
5 07-15-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
6 07~19-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
7 07-20-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
8 07-21-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
9 07-22-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
10 07-26-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
11 07-27-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
12 07-28-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
13 07-29-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
14 08-02-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
15 08-03-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
16 08-04-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
17 08-05-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
18 08-09-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
19 08~10-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
20 08-11-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
21 08-12-93 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
22 RECEIPT # 5896 THRU 6819 07/12/1993 08/12/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
Shred 1397 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 08/16/1893 09/14/1993 09/14/2002 06-03-01 4
Date Tama~ayne, Finance Officer Date Larry ~e~ple/A~m Svce Dir Date JiM l~arkman, City Attorney
Page 2
Notification Number 10/21/2002
122 Destruction Notification Report
15:54=32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name= 4151
Records Coordinator= LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code= Phone= {909)477-2700 ext=2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your inltials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
R~TU~N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
FOLDER Description
1 DAILY CASH RECEIPTS 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
2 DATED 08-16-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
3 08-17-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
4 08-18-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
5 08-19-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
6 08-23-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
7 08-24-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
8 08-25-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
9 08-26-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
10 08-30-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
11 08-31-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
12 09-01-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
13 09-02-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
14 09-07-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
15 09-08-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
16 09-09-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
17 09-10-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
18 09-14-93 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
~ 08/16/1993 09/14/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
RECEIPT
6820
THRU
7915
hred 1398 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 10/28/2002 06-03-01 5
Date T~ Layne, Finance Officer Date Larry Temple, q%&]af Svcs Dir Date ' ~ Markma~, City Attorney
Page 4
Notification Number 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
122 15=54:32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name= 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mall Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETurN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents} Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
FOLDER Description
1 DAILY CASH RECEIPTS 09/18/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
2 DATED: 9-15-93 09/15/1983 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
3 9-16-93 09/15/1893 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
4 9-20-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
5 9-21-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
6 9-22-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
7 9-23-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
8 9-27-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
9 9-28-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
10 9-29-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
11 9-30-93 09/15/1893 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
12 10-04-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
13 10-05-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
14 10-06-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
15 10-07-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
16 10-11-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
17 10-12-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
18 10-12-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
19 10-13-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
20 10-14-93 08/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
~ 21 10-18-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / ReV
22 10-19-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
23 10-20-93
Officer Date Larry Temple,6~%~n Svcs Dir J,ate ~Markman, City Attorney
Tam~ Layne,
Finance
Date
Page 5
NotlficationNumber
122 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
15:54=32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name= 4151
Records Coordinator= LAYNE, TAMA~A Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETuy~N THR LIST TO THE RECOP~DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
24 10-21-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Eev
25 10-2S-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
26 10-26-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
27 10-27-93 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
28 10-28-99 09/15/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
29 RECEIPT 7916 THRU 9415 09/19/1993 10/28/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
~Shred 1399 4020.3 Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue Files 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 12/07/2002 06-03-01 6
FOLDER Description
1 DAILY CASH RECEIPTS 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
2 DATED 11-01-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
3 11-02-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
4 11-03-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts Rev
5 11-04-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
6 11-08-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
7 11-09-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
8 11-10-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
9 11-15-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
10 11-16-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
11 11-17-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
12 11-18-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
Date T~ayne, Finance Officer Date Larry Temple, ~ Svcs Dir ' Date J~ Markman, City Attorney
Page 6
Notification Number 10/21/2002
122 Destruction Notification Report
15:54:32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINltNCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYITE, TAMAR3% Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
R~Tu~N THE LIST TO THE RECOP, DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
13 11-22-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
14 11-23-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
15 11-24-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1995 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
16 11-29-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
17 11-30-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
18 12-01-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
19 12-02-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
20 12-06-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
21 12-07-93 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
22 RECEIPT 9416 THRU 10554 11/01/1993 12/07/1993 Daily Cash Receipts / Rev
Shred 2710 4030.7 Dept. Sign-off List for Payroll 07/01/2000 12/31/2000 12/31/2002 14-02-02 8
BOX Contents: Payroll Sign-off Regis (7/00 - 12/2000)
Shred 2373 4041.3 State R Fed'l Qtrly Payroll Reports 09/01/1996 10/51/1997 10/31/2002 07-06-01 11
BOX Contents: Payroll Qtrly Taxes (9/96 - 12/96)
¥
Date Tam~Layne, Finance Officer Date Larry Temple,~-A~m Svcs Dir Date J~l Markman, City Attorney
Page 7
Notification Number 10/21/2002
122 Destruction Notification Report
15:54=32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
hred 2425 4041.3 State & Fed'l Qtrly Payroll Reports 09/01/1997 12/31/1997 12/31/2002 17-02-01 11
Box Contents: Payroll Qtrly Taxes (9/1997 - 12/1997)
Shred 2153 4040.9 Time Cards 04/27/1997 07/06/1397 07/06/2002 03-01-02 5
BOX Contents: Payroll Time Cards 4/27/97 - 7/6/97
hred 2152 4040.9 Time Cards 07/20/1997 09/28/1997 09/28/2002 03-01-02 6
Box Contents: Payroll Time Cards 7/20/97 - 9/28/97
Shred 2151 4040.9 Time Cards 10/12/1997 12/07/1997 12/07/2002 08-03-03 3
Box Contents: Payroll Time Cards 10/12/97 - 12/7/97
Shred 2414 4041.2 Vacation & Sick Leave Reports 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/31/2002 16-02-02 12
Box Contents: Vacation/Sick Leave Report (7/98-12/98)
' Dat~ T~ Layne, Finance Officer Date Larry ir
Page 8
Notification Number 10/21/2002
122 Destruction Notification Report
15:54~32
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4151 FINANCE
Bill to Name: 4151
Records Coordinator: LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2430
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUP~N THE LIST TO THE RECOP~DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X} Code Box Nkn~ber Code (Box Contents} Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
hred4041.2 Vacation Sick 01/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/31/2002 13-02-02 10
2453
&
Leave
Reports
Sox Contents: Workers Comp Report (Jan-Dec 1998)
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted -- 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department -- 16
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date Tau~ Layne, Finance Officer Date Larry Temple;--A-dm Svcs Dir Date ' J~ Markman,-City Attorney
Page 9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destxuction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destxoy listed records tmtil notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Business Licensing (4152) Requestor: Dawn Bates
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
1020.5 - Accounts Registers All that were superseded prior to January, 2001
1020.6 - Renewal Registers Calendar year 2000
12060.4 - Taxicab Operations Files All that became inactive prior to January, 2001
4020.6 - License and Permit Accounts All that became inactive prior to January, 2001
4020.7 - Massage Permits / Permit Fees All that became inactive prior to January, 2001
Deparfm:nt Approval J~~~ 0)l~l~'v/ City Attorney Approval ~(~ required)
Signature ~_~j / D~e
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Risk Management (4154) Requestor: George Rivera
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of'
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
5080.3 - Pre-Empl. Physicals (non-hires) All thru calendar year 2000
5100.5 - Motor Vehicle Reports (MVR's) All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2003
ig/ artinent Approval // '~}~ ~q// C~ttorney Appr _°vga(if required)/
~u~e~/~ Date Signat~e ~ '
Council Approval Date / Resolution ~ Des~oyed by:
Signature Date
Notification N%umber 10/21/2002
123 Destruction Notification Report
16=17=45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
41S4 RISK F~%NAGEMENT
Bill to Name= 4154
Records Coordinator= Joe Sanchez Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext:2420
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box N%unber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
'~/~hred 1388 7040.6 Claims Against the City 01/01/1992 12/31/199S 12/31/2002 06-02-03 2
FOLDBR Description
I ACOSTA DARLENE 95-S4 01/01/1992 12/31/1999 Claims Against the City
2 ACOSTA EDWARD 96-02 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
3 AREL~%NO RBRB 95-53 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
4 ARCENEAUX CHRISTINA 96-15 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
5 ASKEW DENNIS & BRIDGET 95-56 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 claims Against the City
6 BARTOLOTTO PAULINE 95-08 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
7 BERHAGEN ROBERT 95-48 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
8 BLUM CARLOS 94-01 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Clalms Against the City
9 BOPKO C~RIS 95-03 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
10 BOEHM HERBERT 94-33 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
11 BORDER MICHAEL 95-30 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
12 BORDER MICHAEL 95-37 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
13 BRUCE S~/qDY 95-10 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
14 BURFdA~/~D M~RIL~I~ 95-17 01/01/1992 12/31/1999 Claims Against the City
15 BURNS WES LEE 93-72 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
16 CALZADA ANGEL 95-06 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
17 CAMPBELL SCOTT 95-62 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
18 CASTANEDA ROCAEL 95-31 01/01/1992 12/31/1999 Claims Against the City
19 CASTEEL RICH,.RD 93-29 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
20 COOPER STACY 95-07 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
21 GRAIG JEFFREY 93-57
22 CROSS VICT~ORIA 95-18 01/01/1992 12/31/19~aims Against the City
D~te Geor~e~ivera, Adm Svcs Mgr Date Larry Temple,~Adm Svcs Dir i orney
Page i
Notification Number 10/21/2002
123 Destruction Notification Report
16:17:45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4154 RISK MANAGEMENT
Bill to Name: 4154
Records Coordinator: Joe Sanchez Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2420
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
R~TU~U~ THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box N%unber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
23 DCA CABLE COMPl~NY 92-51 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
24 DIETZ MELISSA 95-40 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
25 DURAN JERRY 95-36 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
26 FAULKNER TIM WRIST 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
27 FEOLE DOMINICK 91-19 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
28 FIRE DEPT REQUESTS FOR PHYSICAL 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
29 THE GAS CO 95-26 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
30 GASKILL BITT 95-44 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
31 GOLF LE~URNING CENTER 94-74 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
~.32 GRIFFIN SRIRR'L 95-23 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
33 HENRY RODGER & ANGELA 95-45 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
34 HERNANDEZ NAT}~N 95-55 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
35 HOWARD CLIFT 95-09 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
36 HYDROTECN WATER TRUCK SUIT 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
37 SODNICK RUTH 95-70 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
38 KENNEDY TYLER 95-42 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
39 J. MURP-~Y CONSTRUCTION 92-38 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 claims Against the City
40 JONES OSBORN 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
41 SIMS MICHAEL & PATRICIA 92-53 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
42 KORGA~ RANDALL 95-20 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
43 LEMKAU ROBERT & CINDY 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
44 LEMKAU ROBERT & CINDY 95-04 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
Page 2
Notification Number 10/21/2002
123 Destruction Notification Report
16=17:45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4154 RISK MANAGEMENT
Bill to Name: 4154
Records Coordinator: Joe Sanchez Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2420
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo Justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code {Box Contents} Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
45 LEWIS DEVELOPMENT 93-06 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
46 LYONS FAMILY 95-14 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
47 MASON JOAN & BOB 95-72 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
FOLDER Description
i BE MCMURRAY 95-51 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
2 MCFARLAND NINA 95-01 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
3 MELLARD RUTH 94-49 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 claims Against the City
4 MID CENTURY INS 92-22 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
5 CROSS REF FARMERS INS 92-19 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
6 MONTEZ ROBERT 93-49 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
7 MORENO RITA 95-60 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
8 MORRIS BILLY 95-13 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
9 MUNIZ VICTOR 95-68 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
10 OLSEN JUDY 95-34 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
11 PETERSON TALMADGE 90-24 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
12 PREFERRED RISK GROUP 95-73 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
13 RAMOS CERISTINE 95-35 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
14 RANSDELL DENISE 95-50 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
D~te Geo~j~ Rivera, Adm Sv~s Mgr Date Larry Temple, ir Date
Page 3
Notification Number 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
123 16:17:45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4154 RISK F~%NA~EMENT
Bill to Name: 4154
Records Coordinator: Joe Sanchez Mail Code: Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext:2420
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACR box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUP~ THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
16 CONSTRUCTION 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
17 SANTOS EUSTOLIA 95-27 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
18 SCHMIDT JOHN 95-52 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
19 SCHRADER BRIAN 93-47 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
20 SECORE EDWARD 92-32 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
21 SMITH BRUCE 95-69 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
22 SO. CALIF GAS 93-50 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
23 SOUZA CHADLER DEBORA 93-71 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
24 TENENBAUM BEVERLY 95-29 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
25 TORREZ JOHN 95-61 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
26 WOLD FP~NCES 95-33 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
27 WOLSKI EDMUND 93-64 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
28 WREN LOIS 95-41 01/01/1992 12/31/1995 Claims Against the City
hred 1383 7030.4 Non-Ltabili~y Cases 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 **HOLD** 12/31/2002 06-02-03 4
/ BOX ON HOLD / BOX RECORD TITLE #7030.4 ON HOLD / FO~DER #1 RECORD TITLE #7030.4 ON HOLD /
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 02/19/1999 TO: conversion record
Date Ge/~ge Rivera, Adm'Svcs Mgr Date Larry Temple, Date
Page 4
Notification Number 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
123 16:17:45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4154 RISK MANAGEMENT
Bill to Name: 4154
Records Coordinator: Joe Sanchez Hail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2420
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initlals next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETIY~N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
FOLDER Description
1 AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA/qY 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
2 BARMAKIAN COMPANYE COMPANY 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
3 BARMAKIAN COMPANY 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
4 BALRYMPLE JOHN A. 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
5 GONZALES, YON C~L~ 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
6 HFA ASSOCIATES 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
7 KETNER, MARY FRANCES 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
8 O. & B. EQUIPMENT 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
9 PSOMAS AND ASSOCIATES 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
10 FOREST PRESERVATION OF SOUTREP, N CALIFOHNIA 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
11 SAN BERNARDINO SAGE FRIENDS 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
12 DAVID ALLEN JAMES, SR., AND LEEONA KLIPPSTEIN 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
13 SMITHS FOOD KING 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
14 TERAN MARIO 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
15 YOUNG RICHARD CAL-DUCT, INC 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Non-Liability Cases
Page 4
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 1
Elglbile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
V
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: G.I.S. (4160) Requestor: Ingrid Bruce
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 2000
/~artment Approval ~At~orney Appr~v~(if. requ}red~
Dat/e// Signature ~ ' ~ate/
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual desm~ction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: M.I.S. (4161) Requestor: Robert Bowery
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records
Record Title Code fi.om Records Retention / Documents 0Vlo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - General Correspondence All thru calendar year 2000
14041.0 - Service/Help Desk Requests All that became inactive/resolved prior to 1/1/2001
2040.3 - Hardware/Soft:ware Acquisition Requests All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2001
2040.4 - Hardware Inventory All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2001
2040.5 - Software Inventory All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2001
2050.2 - Dept'l Bhdget Working Papers All thru calendar year 2000
5010.0 - Nightly Systems Backups All thru 10/31/2002 (to be reused)
5010.1 - Monthly Systems Backups All thru calendar year 2000 (to be reused)
5010.2 - Year-end System Backups All thru calendar year 2000 (to be mused)
5010.8 - Network Config. Maps/Plans All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2001
Department Approval ~CCty Attorney Approval~f required)
Signature J Date Signature ~_____~(,/ Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual deslruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Facilities Maint/Yard (4245) Requestor: Sandra Mellem
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Re~ords Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
RecordscheduleTitlewhenCOdeapplicable) from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
1020.1 - General Correspondence ] Calendar year 2000
14041.1 - Vehicle Operators Daily Checklist Calendar year 2000
14041.2 - Employee Daily Activity Sheets Calendar year 2000
16010.8 - Pesticide Application Forms Calendar year 1999
16010.9 - Monthly Pesticide Use Reports Calendar year 1999
6010.4 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 2000
6060.3 - Equipt. Maintenance Records All that became inactive prior to January, 2001
~ Attg/rney Apprqg,~fl/~f required)'
Signature Signature ~lJ Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
124 Destruction Notification Report
16=31=01
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4245 FACILITIES MAINT/YARD
Bill to Name: 4245
Records Coordinator: Mellem, Sandra Mall Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4104
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
[] Shred 2305 14041.0 Service Order Requests 05/01/1997 07/31/1997 07/31/2002 09-02-02 6
Box Contents: Service Order Requests (5/97 - 7/97)
] Shred 2306 14041.0 Service Order Requests 08/01/1997 10/31/1997 10/31/2002 09-02-02 3
Box Contents: Service Order Requests (8/97 - 10/97)
] Shred 2307 14041.0 Service Order Requests 11/01/1997 12/31/1997 12/31/2002 09-02-02 4
Box Contents: Service Order Requests (11/97 - 12/97)
E = Excluded
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Blgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 3
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
!
Page i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Planning (4333) Requestor: Brad Buller
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers All dated thru calendar year 2000
$021 .~mc uccup,~tluii ?~,mlrs -~//o-~-'/ All-datc~--rl~io~lt'u 12/3 i/2002 (to be transferred
Department Approval City A / orney Approval
! Irate Signature __
Council Approval Date ! Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
116 Destruction Notification Report
16=58=39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PLANNING DIVISION
Bill to Name= 4333
Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code= Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext=4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold,
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECOP, DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
hred 1894 1020.1 Sen'l Correspondence 01/02/1997 12/29/1997 **HOLD** 12/29/1999 05-03-02 2
/ BOX ON HOLD /
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 11/08/2000 To: Gail Sanchez
] Shred 2092 1020.1 Gen'l Correspondence 0~ %.~ 01/01/1998 12/31/1998 **HOLD** 12/31/2000 04-03-01 1
/ BOX ON HOLD /
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 08/02/2001 TO: Gaii Sanchez
Box Contents: Chron Correspondence - 1998
~ Shred 2261 1020.1 ~en'l Correspondence ~/~ 01/01/1999 06/30/1999 **HOLD** 06/30/2001 07-01-01 6
/ BOX ON HOLD /
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 08/02/2001 To: Gail Sanchez
Box Contents: Gen'l Correspond (1/99 - 6/99)
~ Shred 2262 1020.1 Sen'l Correspondence O~ ,~ 07/01/1999 12/31/1999 **HO~D** 12/31/2001 07-01-01 5
/ BOX ON SOLD /
~ *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 08/12/2002 To: Gail Sanchez
I
Notification Number 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
116 16:58:39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PLANNING DIVISION
Bill to Name: 4333
Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Hark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
Box Contents: Oen'l Correspond (7/99 - 12/99)
] Shred 2601 1020.1 Oen'l Correspondence ~/ 01/01/2000 06/30/2000 **HOLD** 06/30/2002 02-01-01 2
/ BOX ON HOLD /
*HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 08/12/2002 TO: Gall Sanchez
BOX Contents: Gen'l Corresp (1/2000 - 6/2000)
] Shred 2598 1020.1 Gen'l Correspondence ~ ~ 07/01/2000 12/31/2000 12/31/2002 02-01-01 1
BOX Contents: Gen'l Corresp (7/2000 - 12/2000)
General Plans & Amendments 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 **HOLD** 03/31/1996 0
Archive 2576 2030.3
/ BOX RECORD TITLE #2030.3 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 REC0PJ) TITLE #2030.3 ON HOLD /
Box Contents: Gen'l Plan Amends
FOLDER Description
I Potential "OP" GPA "86" 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment
2 GPA 91-01A (Planning Network); GPA 91-02B; GPA 91-03A - M; 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment
~ 3 GPA 91-04A (Air Quality); GPA 92-01 (City of RC); GPA 92-02A-5; 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment
-~ 4 GPA 93-01A (Wheatley) 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & ~endment
I /{? l ' I
Date IBrad~'er,~q~y Planner Date J~ Mark~nan, City Attorney
Page 2
Notification Number 10/21/2002
116 Destruction Notification Report
16=58=39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PI~%NNINO DIVISION
Bill to Name: 4333
Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUaR THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
5 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment
can/Recyc 2042 7010.2 Planning Co~isson Agendas 01/08/1997 12/24/1997 12/24/2002 13-01-01 2
BOX Contents: Planning Com~ission Agendas (1997)
FOLDER Description
1 *** Scanned November, 1999 *** 01/08/1997 12/24/1997 Planning Commisson Agenda
can/Recyc 2597 2030.5 Specific Plans R C~mnunity Plans 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 **HOLD** 11/30/2002 11-01-01 1
/ BOX RECORD TITLE #2030.5 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TITLE #2010.5 ON HOLD /
Box Contents: Specific Plans (various)
POLDER Description
1 VCPA (Streamlining) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
2 VCPA 91-03 (A - M) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
3 VCPA 91-02 (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
4 VCPA 91-01 (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
5 VCPA 90-02 (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
6 VCPA 90-01 (Jim Moffett) (Also see: CUP 90-06) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
~ 7 VCPA 98-04 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
Date ~rad B~er, ~ Planner Date J~ ~arkman, City Attorney
Page 3
Notification Number 10/21/2002
116 Destruction Notification Report
16=58=39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PLANNING DIVISION
Bill to Name= 4333
Records Coordinator= SA/~CHEZ, GAIL Mail Code~ Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUI~N THE LIST TO THE RECOP, DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
8 TVCPA 95-01 (N/W Foothill & Rochester) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
9 TVCPA 94-02 (Streamlining) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
10 TVPC 94-01 (Western Land Properties) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
ll TVCPA 91-02 (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
12 TVCPA 91-01 (City Of Rancho C~/camonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
13 TVCPA 90-01 (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
14 TVCPA 89-01 (Western Properties) 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
15 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 11/01/1988 11/30/1998 Specific Plans & Communit
can/Recyc 2731 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR's) 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 06-02-01 2
Box Contents: ~R'S (1999)
FOLDER Description
1 MDR 99-32; MDR 99-33 (90' tower); MDR 99-34; MDR 99-35; 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
2 MDR 99-37; MDR 99-38 (Road Wheel Testing); MDR 99-39; MDR 99-40; 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
3 MDR 99-41 (Dispensers ARCO); MDR 99-44 (Asstd. Living Conversion); 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
4 MDR 99-45; MDR 99-48 (Pac Bell Wireless); MDR 99-49 (Barton Plaza) 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
5 MDR 99-50; MDR 99-51; MDR 99-53 (Exterior Elevator) 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
6 *** Scanned Oct, 2002 *** 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
Page 4
Notification Number 10/21/2002
116 Destruction Notification Report
16:58:39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PLANNING DIVISION
Bill to Name: 4333
Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code= Phones (909)477-2700 ext:4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUI~N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Neme Dates On Destroy
Code Box Nuznber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
can/Recyc 2613 10021.7 Variances & Minor Exceptions 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 09/30/2002 06-03-02 6
BOX Contents: Variances (multiple years)
FOLDER Description
i VAR 91-10 (Rancho San Antonio); VAR 91-12 {S/W Design Group); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
2 VA 91-09 (Tract 14116); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Bxcepti
3 VAR 92-01 (David Hernandez); VA 92-02 (Silva); VAR 92-03 {Wenning); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
4 VAR 92-04 (Thomas Board); VAR 92-05 (Longwell Invest); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
5 VAR 92-06 (Greg Dorst); VAR 92-07 (G & D Construction); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
6 VAR 93-01 (Sharfi); VAR 93-02 (Schlosser Forge); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
7 VAR 93-04 (Richard Nero); VAR 93-05 (Thomas Winery); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Except1
8 VAR 93-06 (E & R Rancho Pacific); VAR 93-07 (Elana Riedel); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Except1
9 VlLR 93-08 {Flores); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
10 VAR 94-02 (0rtiz); VAR 94-04 (Campos); VAR 94-05 (Matreyek); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Except1
11 VAR 94-06 (Gelmini); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Bxcepti
12 VA 95-01 (Mester); VA 95-02 (BHP Steel); VAR 95-03 (Gonzales); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
13 VA 95-06 (Campos); 06/01/1991 09/39/2000 Variances & Minor Bxcepti
14 VAR 96-03 (Max Williams); VA 96-04 (Flatten); VA 96-05 (Park Place); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
15 VA 96-06 (Stewart); VA 96-07 (Diversified); VAR 96-08 (Lagness); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
16 VAR 96-09 (Jehovah Witnesses); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
17 VAR 97-01 (Chavin); VA 97-02 (Bill Angel); VA 97-04 (Gasparrelli); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 variances & Minor Excepti
18 VA 98-01 (Hunt); VA 98-02 (Charles Joseph ASSOC); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Sxcepti
~ 19 VAR 98-03 (Airtouch Monopole); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Except1
20 VAR 99-01 (Amethyst Estates); VAR 99-04 (San Pedro Sign CO); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
Ii 'Mar n, City ttorney
ad 3/ , Plan.er Date J
Page 5
Notification N~m~er 10/21/2002
Destruction Notification Report
116 16~58=39
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4333 PLANNING DIVISION
Bill to Name= 4333
Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone= (909)477-2700 ext:4327
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? / / Location Space#
21 VAR 99-09 (Clifford); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
22 V~ 00-01 (Forecast); VA 00-03 (Lee); VA 00-05 {Fieldstone); 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 variances & Minor Excepti
23 VAR 00-08 (Pacific Bell Wireless) 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
24 *** Scar~ned Oct, 2002 *** 06/01/1991 09/30/2000 Variances & Minor Excepti
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 7
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out -- 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted =
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department --
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Page 5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Building & Safety (4373) Requestor: Linda Courtne¥
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records
have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's Automated Records
Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage
computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records /
Record Title Code from Records Retention Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
3020.3 - Utilities Release Log Calendar year 2000
3020.4 - Inspection Statistical Summaries Calendar year 1992
3030.1 - Applications for Temporary Utilities Calendar year 2000
3030.3 - Complaints & Inspection Requests All that became inactive or were resolved in 2000
3030.4 - Applications for Plan Duplication Calendar year 2000
3030.5 - Misc. Applications Calendar year 2000
8021.1 - Plan Ck/Bldg Permit Expiration or Exten- Calendar year 1999
sion letters (Recheck Letters)
8040.4 - Soil, Percolation & Hydrology studies All thru calendar year 2000 (after scanning)
8040.5 - Grading Certifications All thru calendar year 2000 (after scanning)
8040.6 - Calculations, supporting documents All thru calendar year 2000 (after scanning)
8050.1 - Code Violation Correspondence All that became inactive or were resolved in 1999
8050.2 - Code Modification Forms All thru calendar year 2000 (after scanning)
8050.3 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
8050.4 - Structure Abatement Notices All that became inactive or were resolved in 1999
8070.3 - Bldg. Inspection Reports & Files All that became inactive in 1999
8070.4 - Daily Inspection Records Calendar year 2000
Depa~e~ Appr9va~? O[~ty Atlorney Approv~/~if required)
S~tu{e __ __x..>(j 'Date
/
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number 10/21/2002
125 Destruction Notification Report
17:14:19 ·
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4373 BUILDING & SAFETY DIV
Bill to Name: 4373
Records Coordinator: COURTNEY, LINDA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4227
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUI~N THE LIST TO TH~ RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Scan/Recyc 2171 8020.1 Construction Permits 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2002 12-02-02 2
Box Contents: Building Permits 1/00-3/00 (A-L)
FOLDER Description
1 Building Permits (A-L), includes plans 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 Construction Permits
2 *** Scanned May, 2000 *** 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 Construction Permits
~Scan/Recyc 2172 8020.1 Construction Permits 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2002 12-03-03 5
BOX Contents: Building Permits (1/00-3/00) (M-Z,Tracts)
FOLDER Description
1 M thru Z & Tracts (including plans) 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 Construction Permits
2 *** Scanned June, 2000 *** 01/01/2000 03/31/2000 Construction Permits
Scan/Recyc2192 8020.1 Construction Permits 04/01/2000 06/30/2000
06/30/2002
06-02-01
8
Box Contents: Bldg Perm/ts 4/2000 - 6/2000
FOLDER Description
1 A thru K {includes plans) 04/01/2000 06/30/2000 Construction Permits
2 *** Scanned July, 2000 *** 04/01/2000 06/30/2000 Construction Permits
I I? ° I
{
Pa~e I
Notification Number 10/21/2002
125 Destruction Notification Report
17:14:19
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4373 BUILDIN~ & SAFETY DIV
Bill to Name: 4373
Records Coordinator: COURTNEY, LINDA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4227
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Mold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
[
~Scan/Recyc 2193 8020.1 Construction Permits 04/01/2000 06/30/2000 06/30/2002 06-02-01 5
Box Contents: Bldg Permits 6/2000 - 6/2000
FOLDER Description
I L thru Z, Tracts (includes plans) 04/01/2000 06/30/2000 Construction Permits
2 *** Scanned July, 2000 *** 04/01/2000 06/30/2000 Construction Permits
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 4
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excludin~ boxes selected for exception )
Date ~oh~o~s, Acting Bldg O~f"l Date ~Merk~n, City Attornsy
Pege 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Community Services (4532) Requestor: Melissa Morales
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - Dept'l. General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
1020.3 - Programs Calendar year 1998
1020.4 - Projects All that completed/terminated prior to 1/1/1999
1020.5 - Special Events Calendar year 1998
14010.6 - Scholarship Applications Calendar year 2000
14020.3 - Recreation Class Schedule Calendar year 2000 (1 original sent to Archives)
16010.7 - Use of City Facilities Calendar year 2000
2050.2 - Dept'l. Budget Working Papers Calendar year 2000
5030.5 - Volunteer Applicationg / Reports All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2001
7010.3 -Advisory Council Agendas Calendar year 2000 (to be scanned, then recycled)
7012.9 - Audio Tapes Calendar year 2000 (to be reused)
.m e~/ff~oval xCi~ Attorney Approya~f required)
Date Signature _~' Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number
126 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
17:18:25
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES
Bill to Name: 4532
Records Coordinator: MORALES, MELISSA Mall Code: Phone: (909)477-2760 ext:2103
~ The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initlals next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RBTu~/q THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
~ Shred 2274 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 05/24/2000 07/05/2000 07/05/2002 07-05-01 2
~ Box Contents: Regist Deposits 5/00 - 7/00
] Shred 2219 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/2000 08/31/2000 08/31/2002 10-02-02 5
~ Box Contents: Sun~ner 2000 Deposits, receipts
S~red 2221 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/2000 08/31/2000 08/31/2002 10-02-01 1
BOX Contents: Sun, er 2000 Registration Forms
] Shred 2659 14010.2 Registration Foms & 06/01/2000
Receipts
08/31/2000
08/31/2002
07-05-02
2
B
ox Contents: Regist Forms, Receipts (6/2000 - 8/2000)
FOLDER Description
1 Summer 2000 Season (6/2000 - 8/2000) 06/01/2000 08/31/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
] Shred 2272 14010.2 Regis.tration Forms & Receipts 07/06/2000 10/13/2000 10/13/2002 07-05-01 4
Date Melissa Morales, Sr. A~n Sec Date Kev~n Mc~le, Co~ Svcs Dir Date J~ Matin, City Attorney
~ Page I
Notification Number
126 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
17:18:25
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES
Bill to Name= 4532
Records Coordinator= MORALES, MELISSA Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2760 ext:2103
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
R~'i'uKN THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
Box Contents: Resist Deposits 7/00 - 10/00
] Shred 2658 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 11/30/2002 07-05-02 3
Box Contents= Regist Forms, Receipts {8/2000-11/2000)
~'FOLDER Description
1 Fall 2000 Season (8/2000 - 11/2000) 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 11/30/2002 07-04-01 5
Shred
2663
14010.2
~ BOX Contents: Regist Forms, Receipts (8/2000-11/2000)
FOLDER Description
1 Fall 2000 Season (8/2000 - 11/2000) 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
~ Shred 2665 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 11/30/2002 07-04-02 3
~_ Sox Contents: Regist Forms, Receipts {8/2000-11/2000)
FOLDER Description
I Fall 2000 Season (8/2000 - 11/2000) 08/01/2000 11/30/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
~-~.
Date Melissa Morales, Sr. ~mqn Sec Date Kevin M~lr~le, Comm Svcs Dir Date J~Markman, City Attorney
Page 2
Noti£ication Number 10/21/2002
126 Destruction Notification Report
17:18:25
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES
Bill to Name: 4532
Records Coordinator: MORALES, MELISSA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2760 ext:2103
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETUR/~ THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
~ Shred 2666 14010.2 For~s 06/01/2000 11/30/2000 03-03-02 3
Registration
11/30/2002
Box Contents: Regist deposits/receipts (6/00 - 11/00)
1 Summer & Fall 2000 registration deposits & receipts 06/01/2000 11/30/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
Shred 2278 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 05/30/2000 12/14/2000 12/14/2002 07-05-03 3
~ Box Contents: Regist Forms & Deposits 10/00 - 12/00
] Shred 2279 14010.2 Registration Forms a Receipts 08/21/2000 12/14/2000 12/14/2002 07-05-03 1
BOX Contents: Regist Forms 8/00 - 12/00
~ Shred 2667 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 01/01/2000 12/31/2000 12/31/2002 03-08-02 1
~ Box Contents: Regist forms, deposits/rec (2000)
FOLDER Description
i Regist forms, receipts, deposits for classes/programs/activities 01/01/2000 12/31/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
2 including Playschool for the calendar year 2000 01/01/2000 12/31/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
m~ Date
Date Melissa Morales, Sr. Admin Sec Date Kevln M~ Svcs Dir J Markman, City Attorney
Page 3
Notification Number
126 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
17=18:25
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4532 COMMDI~ITY SERVICES
Bill to Name= 4532
Records Coordinator= MORALES, M~LISSA Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2760 ext=2103
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RI~'l'um, N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
~ Registration Forms & Receipts 01/01/2000 12/31/2000 12/31/2002 04-03-01 5
Shred
2668
14010.2
Box Contents: Registration deposits (2000)
~ FOLDER Description
1 Registration deposits for classes/programs/trips (2000) 01/01/2000 12/31/2000 Registration Forms & Rece
Ellgible Boxes on Hold = 0
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 13
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date Melissa Morales, Sr. Admin Sec Date evi Svce Dir Date Ji~Markman, City Attorney
P age 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Library (4533) Requestor: Vivian Garcia
I have inspected the following records/documents and reconunend/request that they be destroyed.
These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, are not listed in the
City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested
outside the scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
11300.1 - Donation records Calendar year 1998
11800.2 - Public Services & Relations Calendar year 1998
11801.0 - Public Inquiries & Complaints Calendar year 1998
4012.3 - Revenue Files Calendar year 2000
4020.5 - Grants All that have been completed and audited prior
to 1/1/1994
5030.0 - Library Board Agendas All thru calendar year 2001 (after scanning)
5030.5 - Volunteer Program records All that became inactive prior to 1/1/1998
7041.1 - Fines Collected Calendar year 1998
Department Approval Ci~ f.orney A~pT~I
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual deslmction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Engineering (Admin) (Dept 4637) Requestor: Diane Whyte
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that theybe destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not listed in the City's
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
/1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
q 1101.8 - Street Vacations All that were approved prior to 1/1/2001
~/I 1700.9 - Flood Plain (FEMA) All that were superseded prior to 1/1/1993
2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 2000
4010.3 - Assessment Districts All that were approved thru 12/31/2002 (to be
transferred to the Special Districts Division)
Department Approva? City ~ttorney Approval
Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by:
Signature Date
Notification Number
127 Destruction Notification Report 10/21/2002
17:33=05
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN
Bill to Name: 4637
Records Coordinator: W~YT~, DIAITE Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4013
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETURN TH~ LIST TO THE RECOP, DS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
/Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending
Hold?
12/31/2002
Location
Space#
n/Recyc 2614 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR's) 01/01/1989 12/31/1999 **HOLD** 12/31/2001 0
BOX RECORD TITLE #10020.8 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TITLE #10020.8 ON HOLD /
OX Contents: MDR's & DR's
FOLDER Description
1 MDR 93-29; DR 89-09; DR 96-27; DH 97-30, 97-35, 97-38, 97-44; 01/01/1989 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
2 DR 98-07, 98-11, 98-23, 98-24, 98-25, 98-26, 98-27, 98-28, 98-34; 01/01/1989 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
3 DR 99-02, 99-03, 99-07, 99-26, 99-29, 99-44, 99-50 01/01/1989 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
4 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 01/01/1989 12/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen
CB~~/Recyc 2579 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR's) 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 **HOLD** 07/31/2002 06-03-03 1
BOX RECORD TITLE #10020.8 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TITLE %10020.8 ON HOLD /
x Contents: DR~S (2/1990 - 7/2000)
FOLDER Description
1 DR 90-05, DR 90-12 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
2 DR 91-03 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
3 DR 92-11 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
4 DS 93-03, DR 93-05, DR 93-20 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
5 DR 94-14 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
6 DR 95-02, DR 95-17, DR 95-29, DR 95-30, DR 95-33 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
7 DR 96-02, DE 96-08, DR 96-10, DR 96-11, DR 96-13 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
8 DR 96-16, DR 96-26, DR 96-28, DR 96-33 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
Page i
Notification Number 10/21/2002
127 Destruction Notification Report
17:33:06
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Records Management Division
4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN
Bill to Name: 4637
Records Coordinator= WHYTE, DIAAIE Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4013
The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2002. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to
be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide
a memo justifying the hold.
RETU-~N THE LIST TO THE RECORDS DIVISION BY NOVEMBER 6, 2002.
Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy
(X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2002 Location Space#
9 DR 97-09, DR 97-09, DR 97-13, DR 97-14, 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
10 DR 97-16, DR 97-24, DR 97-31, DR 97-49 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
11 DR 98-14, DR 98-16, DR 98-18, DR 98-22 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
12 DR 99-30, DR 99-74 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
13 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 02/01/1990 07/31/2000 Subdivisions & Developmen
Eligible Boxes on Hold = 2
Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0
Elgibile Boxes Excepted ~ 0
Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 0
( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or
checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception )
Date City Engr Date O'~e~i~,l City Engineer Date ~ Markman, City Attorney
Page I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval and Authorization
To Destroy Paper Records and]or Documents
(To be processed with the Dec., 2002 semi-annual destruction. Sign, date and return to the Records Division by
November 6, 2002. Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted.)
Department: Engineering (Traffic/Design) (Dept 4639) Requestor: Sue Cooper
I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These
records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not hsted ~n the C~ty
Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the
scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process.
Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of
Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr)
Schedule when applicable)
1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 2000
11100.4 - Streets & Highways Master Plan All that were superseded prior.to 1/1(2001 (to be
transferred to City archives - Larry Henderson)
-11411.0 - Speed Zone Studies All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2001
11610.2 - Street Maps All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2001 (to be
transferred to City archives - Larry Henderson)
11610.3 - Signal System Maps All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2001
11620.1 - Traffic Signal Maintenance Calendar year 1999
2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 2000
All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000
-7030.8 -Traffic Counts
8020.4 - Overload Permits All that were expired/completed/terminated prior
to 1/1/2001
8060.2 - Multi-year projections for Cap Improve. Calendar year 2000
/.Depaxrtment Approval /? ~ttorney Ap~al~
tu~ Signat~~ Date
Council Approval Date / Resolution ~ Destroyed by:
Signature Date
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~NGIN EE I~IN G D~DAI~TMENT
· pATE: November 6, 2002
TO: Diane Young, Records Coordinator
FROM: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Records
Item #11411.0 - Speed Zone Studies and Items #7030.8 -Traffic counts are both valid
for a period of five (5) years. After they are more than 5 years old, they become
obsolete and should be purged. Therefore, speed zone studies and traffic counts done
before January 1, 1998 should be purged.
If you have any questions, piease call me at extension 4051.
C: Diane Whyte, Sr. Admin. Secretary
1106young
T H E CITY OF
l~A N C H 0 C IJ CAM 0 N G A
StaffRe rt
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW CINGULAR WIRELESS TO
PERFORM ON-SITE TESTING AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY YARD
FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING THE SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY
TO INSTALL A WIRELESS MONOPALM COMMUNICATION TOWER.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign these
Agreements to allow Cingular Wireless to perform the on-site tests.
BACKGROUND: SBA Network Services, Inc., on behalf of Cingular Wireless, has been
negotiating a Lease Hold Agreement with City staff for the placement of one monopalm wireless
communication facility at the City Yard. Prior to finalizing the Lease Hold Agreement with the
City, SBA Network Services, Inc., on behalf of Cingular Wireless, would like to determine the
suitability of the site by performing tests, such as soil samples. The City Attorney has
developed an Access License and Indemnity Agreement (attached) to allow wireless carriers
and their consultant team onto the site to perform these tests, while ensuring that the City's
interests are concurrently protected.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DG/jc
Attachment: Access License and Indemnity Agreement
R ^ N C h O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT
SlaffReport
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 15914, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
BIRDSONG PLACE, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF
HILLSIDE STREET, SUBMITTED BY EHR 22, LLC, AND RELEASE OF
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY
COUNCIL ON JANUARY 3, 2001 FROM CALWEST ENTERPRISES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the New
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security and releasing the previous
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to sign the new agreement and security.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Monumentation Cash
Deposit for Tract 15914, generally located on Bi rdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue,
north of Hillside Street, were approved by City Council on January 3, 2001.
The property has been purchased by EHR 22, LLC who has submitted an agreement
and security to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following
amounts'.
Faithful Performance CASH $47,000.00
Labor and Material CASH: $23,500.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,850.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 15914
December 4, 2002
Page 2
Copies of the new agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JS:sc
Attachment
TRACT 15914
9 LOTS
VICINITY MAP I '~'~.'~;~',~, ~
RESOLUTION NO. 0.,}" ,~//0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 15914 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON JANUARY 3, 2001
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did consider an
Improvement Agreement, and related Security, submitted by EHR 22, LLC, as developer,
for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue,
North of Hillside Street and release of the previously approved Improvement Agreement
and Improvement Security for Cai West Enterprises.
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Said Improvement Agreement and Security submitted by EHR 22, LLC, are
hereby approved.
2. The previously approved Improvement Agreement and Security for Cai West
Enterprises are released.
3. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement and
Security on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest thereto.
TH E CITY OF
I~AN CIIO C U CAH O N GA
TO:. Mayor, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager
DATE: December 4, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF A CONTRACT FOR
RENOVATION OF TWO (2) SOFTBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL
COMMUNITY PARK, WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL
ENTERPRISES, INC., OF IRVv~INDALE, CALIFORNIA, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $21,744.00, FUNDED FROM FUND 1120-305-
5650/1222120-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the award of a contract for
renovation of two (2) softball fields at Red Hill Community Park, per the bid received
to Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California, for a total not to
exceed $21,744.00 ($19,766.96, plus a 10% contingency), funded from fund 1120-
305-5650/1222120-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Engineering Department provided specifications to Purchasing for the renovation
of two (2) softball fields at Red Hill Community Park. Purchasing prepared a Request
for Bid (RFB) and mailed it to six (6) vendors. Four (4) vendors downloaded the RFB
from the City's website. Seven (7) vendors attended the vendor's pre-bid conference.
Five (5) bids were received. After analysis of the bids by Engineering and Purchasing
staff, it has been determined that the award should be made to the lowest, most
responsive and responsible vendor, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., that most
closely meets the specifications as required by the Engineering Department.
Respectfully submitted,
W~am J. O'Neil ' /
City Engineer
T H E C ~ T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR A CONTRACT FOR
RELOCATION SERVICES FOR THE CIVIC CENTER ROTUNDA
RETROFIT, WITH GOLDEN EAGLE MOVING SERVICES INC., OF
UPLAND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,471.00, FUNDED FROM FUND 1025-
001-5300
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract with Golden Eagle
Moving Services, of Upland, for the relocation services that will be needed for the
Public Counter Staff during the Civic Center Rotunda Retrofit. The amount will not
exceed $2,371.00 ($2,246.00, plus a 10% contingency) and will be funded from
account 1025-001-5300.
Back.qround
In order to accommodate the construction necessary for the seismic retrofit of the
Civic Center it will be necessary to vacate the central rotunda. To accommodate the
public, the City will lease a modular office and locate it next to the Civic Center in the
north employee parking lot. Relocation services will be needed to move the Public
Counter Staff to the temporary building.
A Request For Proposal (RFP) was sent to five (5) relocation services vendors for
the Police Department Renovation and Civic Center Rotunda Retrofit projects. Four
(4) vendors attended the pre-proposal conference. Four responses to the RFP were
received. After analysis of the proposals by Purchasing and Administration staff, it
was determined that three of the responses were unresponsive to the requirements
and requests of the RFP. One responsive and responsible proposal was received
from Golden Eagle Moving Services inc., of Upland. It is recommended to award
Page 2
December 4, 2002
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR A CONTRACT FOR RELOCATION SERVICES FOR
THE CIVIC CENTER ROTUNDA RETROFIT, WITH GOLDEN EAGLE MOVING SERVICES INC.,
OF UPLAND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,471.00, FUNDED FROM FUND 1025-001-5300
the contract for relocation services to Golden Eagle Moving Services. The Civic
Center Rotunda Retrofit total will not exceed $2,371.00 ($2,246.00, plus a 10%
contingency) and will be funded from account 1025-001-5300.
It is recommended that the City Council approve this lease and installation as well as
the necessary appropriation.
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RELINQUISHMENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TO ACCEPT CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD (STATE ROUTE 66) FROM GROVE AVENUE TO EAST
AVENUE, EXCEPT THAT PORTION BOUNDED BY THE SOUTHBOUND
· 1-15 ON-RAMP AND THE NORTHBOUND i-15 OFF-RAMP, TO BE
RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
approve a Relinquishment Cooperative Agreement accepting control and maintenance
over Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) from Grove Avenue to East Avenue, except
that portion bounded by the Southbound 1-15 on-ramp and the northbound 1-15 off-
ramp, by the State of California to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) has been designated as a State Highway for many
years, and is currently under the jurisdiction of the State of California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans). However, it has become apparent that local residents and
businesses would be better served if Foothill Boulevard were under the jurisdiction of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On November 7, 2001, the City Council approved a resolution directing City staff to
initiate negotiations with Caltrans for the relinquishment of Foothill Boulevard. On
August 26, 2002, SB 246 was approved by the State Legislature. SB 246 authorized
Caltrans officials to negotiate with City staff for the relinquishment of Foothill Boulevard.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RELINQUISHMENT OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (STATE ROUTE 66)
December 4, 2002
Page 2
Caltrans has offered to make a lump sum payment to the City in the amount of
$500,000 to satisfy the State's obligation to place Foothill Boulevard in a good state of
repair. City staff is in agreement with this amount, and recommends that the City
Council approve the Relinquishment Cooperative Agreement offered by Caltrans. If the
Relinquishment Cooperative Agreement is approved by City Council, Caltrans staff will
take this agreement to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for final
approval. Caltrans staff estimates that they can take this agreement to the CTC in either
January or February, 2003. The City will assume ownership of Foothill Boulevard
immediately after the adoption, filing and recording of the Resolution of Relinquishment
by the CTC.
The portion of Foothill Boulevard to be relinquished to the City is that portion between
Grove Avenue and East Avenue, except for that portion between the 1-15 Southbound
on-ramp and the Northbound off-ramp. See Attachment "A".
Respectfully submitted,
Williah'c'J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:JAG
Attachment
THE C I I~ Y O F
]~AN Ctl 0 C U CAM 0 N GA
$ ffReport
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
ETIWANDNSAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute a cooperative agreement
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District for design and construction of improvements to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine
Mainline Drainage System.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
For development to occur in the EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area, drainage improvements
on a massive scale would be required. The County Flood Control District along with the
cities of Ontario, Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga agreed upon drainage
improvements needed for the area. They are as shown on Exhibit "A", Regional
Mainline Drainage Map for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area.
In February of 1989, the City adopted the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan
Drainage Report. Subsequently, in August of 1989 the City adopted a resolution
establishing a drainage fee in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area for Regional Mainline
Drainage facilities.
The project is a joint project involving the San Bernardino County Flood Control District
and the cities of Ontario, Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga. The total cost of the
improvements is approximately $120 million, and it is to be funded from a federal grant,
federal loan, San Bernardino County Flood Control and the cities of Ontario, Fontana
and Rancho Cucamonga. Since the Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage system is a
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
December 4, 2002
Page 2
District facility, the cities have agreed to let the District be the lead agency in carrying
out the improvements.
Since 1989 the City has collected Regional Mainline Drainage fees and since the
District is ready to design and construct the improvements, the City is willing to transfer
these fees and subsequent fees to the District. Fees already collected and on deposit
with the City will be transferred to the District for each District contract for design and
construction within 30 days after award of contract. Future fees collected by the City
will be deposited with the District on an annual basis beginning one year after execution
of this agreement. The City's Obligation for contribution of assessment funding towards
the project will terminate in the year 2019, the year the District pays off a federal loan in
the amount of 19.1 million dollars. The project is scheduled to be completed in
approximately 10 years.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:MO:sc
Attachment
Dcb~ D~,u & B~UEA
RESOLUTION NO. (~.~ - 5 / /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
EXECUTING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
TO 'THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CITY) and the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District (DISTRICT) are desirous of proceeding with the
improvements of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System, hereinafter
referred to as PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, funding for PROJECT is to be provided from a federal grant, federal
loan, DISTRICT, CITY, and the cities of Ontario and Fontana; and
WHEREAS, the existing Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage system is a DISTRICT
operated and maintained system; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT, through its Director, is in agreement with the cities of
Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana and Ontario that DISTRICT should be the lead agency in
carrying out the improvement project; and
WHEREAS, CITY, recognizing the need for drainage improvements in the
EtiwandaJSan Sevaine area if future development was to occur, adopted the
Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage Report on February 2, 1989; and
WHEREAS, on August 16, 1989, CITY adopted a resolution establishing a
drainage fee in the EtiwandaJSan Sevaine area for Regional Mainline Drainage facilities
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown on Exhibit "A", Regional Mainline Drainage
Facilities Map, dated January 9, 1990; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is ready to begin design for the construction of
PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, CITY has accumulated Regional Mainline Drainage fees and desires
to transfer these fees and subsequent fees to DISTRICT for design and construction of
PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration and execution, the Cooperative Agreement between the CITY and
RESOLUTION NO.
ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
December 4, 2002
Page 2
DISTRICT for the design and construction of improvements to the Etiwanda/San
Sevaine Mainline Drainage System; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Authorize the execution of the Cooperative Agreement between the CITY
and DISTRICT for the design and construction of improvements to the
Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System.
2. To authorize the Mayor to sign said Agreement and direct the City Clerk to
attach a certified copy of this Resolution, and for the return of the original
copies of said supplement to DISTRICT along with the certified copy of
this Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO.
ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
December 4, 2002
Page 3
the return of the original copies of said supplement to DISTRICT along
with the certified copy of this Resolution.
R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A
I~ N G I N E E l~l N C D E PAI~TM ~ N T
StaffReIx)rt
DA'I~: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam,'AICP, City Manager
~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer[~/~j
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NORRIS
REPKE, iNC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $99,770 (PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY) TO
PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE PROPOSED
CARNELIAN STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM VIVERO STREET TO 19TM
STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11123035650/1291112-0, AND
APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF $109,747 TO ACCOUNT NO.
11123035650/1291112-0 FROM THE GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE FUND
BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Norris
Repke, Inc., to provide professional design services for the proposed Carnelian Storm Drain
Improvements from Vivero Street to 19th Street, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement
and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has approved funding a loan of $3.2 million
for the construction of the Carnelian Storm Drain; however, the improvements must be completed in
the summer of 2003. A proposal was requested and has been received from the consultant. It was
reviewed by staff and found to meet the needs of the City.
Willi~. °"TNei,
city Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachment
//5
Almond Rd
Hillside Rd
Banyan S
F ree__w_~ay_. ~ PROJECT LOCATION
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
THE CITY 0 F
I~AN C H 0 CIICAH ON GA
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Huls
Environmental Management, LLC., in the amount not to exceed
$44,000.00 to provide technical assistance in implementing a
commercial waste diversion program, to be funded from Acct No.
10013135300, and approval of an appropriation of $44,000.00 to Acct.
No. 10013135300 from the Integrated Waste Management fund
balance.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement
with Huls Environmental Management, LLC., in the amount not to exceed $44,000.00 to
provide technical assistance in implementing a commercial waste diversion program, to
be funded from Acct No. 10013135300, and approval of an appropriation of $44,000.00
to Acct. No. 10013135300 from the Integrated Waste Management fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In 1989, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939), forming the
California Integrated Waste Management Board (ClWMB). AB 939 required all
municipalities to divert waste from disposal, including a requirement that 50% waste
diversion be reach by January 1, 2000
In order to meet the mandated 50% diversion rate, the City developed a very successful
residential recycling program along with an extensive public outreach and education
program. As a result, the City was able to achieve a 45% diversion rate in 1999.
In July 2002, the City was notified that its 2000 diversion rate had fallen to 35%. In
response, the City filed for a time extension for compliance that was granted in
I17
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Entering into a Professional Services Agreement
with Huls Environmental Management, LLC
December 4, 2002
Page 2
August 2002, until December 31, 2003. In addition, the City contracted with Huls
Environmental Management, LLC to perform a comprehensive review of the City's
Solid Waste Management Program.
The analysis revealed the reason for the diversion drop was two-fold, first disposal
tonnage increase significantly in the commercial sectors (21,000 tons since 1998),
and second the base year adjustment from 1999 to 2000 was fiat as a result of
inaccuracies in the Waste Board's diversion rate formula. The Waste Board formula
actually shows waste tonnage going down! This is contrary to the actual situation!
It is recommended that City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with
Huls Environmental Management, LLC in the amount not to exceed $44,000.00 to
provide technical assistance in implementing a commercial waste diversion program, to
be funded from Acct No. 10013135300, and approval of an appropriation of $44,000.00
to Acct. No. 10013135300 from the Integrated Waste Management fund balance.
City Engineer
W JO:MT
Attachment
THE CITY OF
~AN CH 0 (~U CAH 0 N GA
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
,Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND, AND CANCEL THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DR 00-66, SUBMI'I-FED BY
PANSIRI AND SURACHAI WA'I-I'ANAPORN, (P.S.W., INC.)
RECOMMENDATION:
This development will not be continued to completion. The Building Permit, PMT2001-
01633 is expired. The owner, P.S.W., Incorporated, has provided written notice of their
intention to cancel the project. It is recommended that the City cancel the Improvement
Agreement for the public improvements and release the Faithful Performance Bond and
Labor and Materialmen Bond for the proposed improvements for DR 00-66.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
DR 00-66, located on the southeast corner of 6th Street and Rochester Court, in the
Industrial District (Subarea 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the
Planning Commission on February 26, 2001. The Developer, P.S.W. Incorporated, has
decided not to continue with the development. The development is for a 26,895 square
foot industrial building on 1.55 acres of land. No clearing., gra. ding or other construction
activities have taken place on the site. The site remains m the same undeveloped
condition, exactly as it was prior to starting the development review process.
Developer: P.S.W., Incorporated
14250 Central Avenue, #A, B, C
Chino, CA 91710
Release: Faithful Performance Bond M104857 $46,100.00
Labor and Materialmen Bond M104857 $23,050.00
Res. pec~ully submitted,
Willi~(J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:MB:sc
Attachment /
of' DROO~6~
EAST'
N
City of Rancho Cucamonl;la'
DR 00-66
R SO'UT,O, .0. ..3/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
CANCELLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
THE RELEASE OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
AND THE RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND MATERIALMEN
BOND FOR DR 00-66
WHEREAS, the building permits for DR 00-66 have expired: and
WHEREAS, written notification from the Developer advising of their intention to
cancel the project has been received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the notification is hereby accepted and the City
Engineer and City Clerk are authorized to cancel the Improvement Agreement, release
the Faithful Performance Bond, and release the Labor and Materialmen Bond.
R A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS, FOR DR 99-15 AND
CUP 99-04, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CATELLUS
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the
Maintenance Guarantee Bonds, for DR 99-15 and CUP 99-04, located on the southeast
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Catellus Development
Corporation.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements
remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Catellus Development Corporation
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Re§peet¥1y submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N G ^
ENGINEERING DEPARTr, IE NT
St tf:f Report
DA'IE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACTS 13812
AND 14120-1, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE,
WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WEALTH V, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, Letter of Credit LG210069, for Tracts 13812 and 14120-1, located on the
south side of Summit Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Wealth V, LLC.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Wealth V, LLC
1028 Westminster Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803
Ros~ly submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
CITY OF rrEt~ Tract 13812
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~TrL~:Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT:
/~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
l~ N GIN E ERIN G ~ E PAR TIll E N T
Staff Report
DA'iE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJEC'D: ACCEPT LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15866,
SUBMITTED BY APHRC24, LLC A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE
DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required landscape improvements for Tract 15866 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to
file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and
accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15866, located on the southeast corner of Milliken
Avenue and Vintage Drive, the applicant was required to complete landscape improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: APHRC24, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
1131 West Sixth Street
Ontado, CA 91762
Release: Faithful Performance Bond BE2616429 $187,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond BE2616429 $ 18,700.00
Rgsp~'c~u Ily supmitted,
City Engineer
QTY OF CITY OF
RANCHO FONTANA
CUCAMONGA N'
OF BERIq [R~INO u..'r.~:.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
gl,~G]]~'TI~,]~G DW/8[OI~ ~'1/,~ ~._.~
RESO'UT,ONNO. 02
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15866 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15866,
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bemardino County.
T H E C I I Y 0 F
I~ANCIIO CIJ C^HONGA
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Allen D. Brock, CBO, Plan Check Manager
SUBJ~-"r: ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing and second reading for
Ordinance No. 693, adopting the 2001 Edition of the California Building Standards
Code, and adopt the accompanying Resolution making express findings of need for
local modifications.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting of November 6, 2002, a public hearing was conducted
and first reading was held for Ordinance 693, adopting the 2001 Edition of the
California Building Standards Code. As part of the process, and satisfying Section
17958.7 of the State Health and Safety Code, local modifications to the code may
only become effective if the City Council makes express findings of need due to
climatic, geologic or topographic conditions.
The accompanying Resolution will fulfill this requirement and must subsequently be
filed with both the Building Standards Commission and State Department of Housing
and Community Development to complete the process.
It should be noted, as part of this years code adoption process the Building and
Safety Division took the same approach as in the 1999 adoption of reducing
previous cod(~ amendments. The intent of this continued effort is to produce a
uniform set of codes that contain only a minimal amount of local modifications.
These modifications are identified and detailed within the accompanying Resolution
and affect only two technical areas within the building code.
The first area of technical modification is within the roofing chapter and provides for
a higher level of fire resistance of roof coverings due to our warm, dry, intense
Page 2
December 4, 2002
ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
winds. The other area of modification is for the control of erosion and protection of
adjacent property during grading operations due to our naturally sloping, rocky
terrain and high wind potential. All other aspects of the code, with the exception of
minimal administration items, remain intact.
SUMMARY
Holding second reading of Ordinance No. 693, adoption of the accompanying
Resolution and forwarding copies to the appropriate State agencies will complete the
code adoption process, and continue our goal of developing a uniform set of codes
and construction standards consistent with our neighboring jurisdictions.
Respectfully submitted,
Allen D. Brock, CBO
Plan Check Manager
ADB:adb
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO
THE CITY'S BUILDING REGULATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 693 ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY
BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR
TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS
A. RECITALS.
(i) California Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and
17958.7 allow a city to make such modifications to the
requirements of the regulations adopted pursuant to Health
and Safety Code Section 17922 as it determines to be
reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological
or topographical conditions;
(ii) Prior to making the modifications permitted under Section
17956.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, this
Council is required to make an express finding that such
modifications or changes are needed in accordance with
California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
find and determine as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, ofthis Resolution.
2. ~l'his Council does hereby expressly find and determine that the
amendments set forth in Ordinance No. 693, as are more fully described
below, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or
topographic conditions. This express finding is supported by and based
upon the following specific findings and determinations.
/3/
Resolution No. 02-XX
Page 2
(a) Geoloqical:
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is primarily located in an alluvial
fan formed from erosion of the San Gabriel Mountains, said
alluvial fan consisting largely of rocky, granular, and highly
erodible soil formations.
2. A unique geological condition exists within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in that two active earthquake faults are present,
which create the potential for severe seismic damage and fire
hazards. There is potential also for damage to roadways and
impairment of access for fire equipment to respond to
emergencies in the event of a severe earthquake.
(b) Tol~o~lral~hical:
1. The topography of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is generally
that of a gently sloping inclined plane which projects from the
base of the San Gabriel Mountains, at an elevation in excess of
2,400 feet above sea level, in a southerly direction where the
elevation is appro)dmately 1,400 feet lower. Natural slopes of 8
percent or greater generally occur in the northem third of the City.
In many cases, slopes in the foothills exceed 40 percent. There
are also locations where steeper topography occurs in the
southern portion of the City. All of these topographical conditions
have created slower response times of emergency vehicles into
the high growth areas, due to the extraordinary uphill slope of the
land.
2. Adverse topographical conditions exist within certain pads of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga that give rise to excessive flooding.
Flood control facilities in these areas are not adequate to handle
the water flow that occurs during major rains. Some of the
streets are actually designed and used for flood control purposes,
thus making fire and emergency access difficult during flood
conditions.
As a consequence, streets within the City are impaired during
such flood conditions and such flooding causes physical damage
to the streets and the accumulation of debris, all of which hinder
the access of fire equipment to respond to fire emergencies.
(c) Climate:
1. Extreme high winds, commonly referred to as Santa Aha winds,
are generated from the desert and reach the basin through
Devore Pass and first contact highly developed areas within City
boundaries at velocities, sometimes in excess of 80 mph.
Resolution No. 02-XX
Page 3
2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is located in a piedmont area of
the San Gabriel Mountains, said location characterized by a
warm and dry climate,
3. The above weather conditions, coupled with flammable
vegetation in the City results in wild land fires, which draw
existing fire fighting forces from structure protection duties for
extended periods of time. This results in extended response
times to structure fires when such personnel and equipment are
committed to non-structural protection,
4. The California Building Code is adopted on a statewide basis
without specific consideration for the above stated geologic,
topographic and climatic conditions.
3. Based upon the forgoing described climatic, geographical and
topographical conditions, the City Council further §nds as follows:
(a) Modifications of Table 15-A, of the California Building Code, 2001 Edition,
are necessary due to local climatic and topographic conditions of warm, dry,
intense winds tending to propagate and extend fires into surrounding
structures and grasslands, and to make access for fire fighting apparatus
difficult. These modifications are further justified based on the conditions
described in Section B.2. (b) and (c) abo~e.
(b) Additions of Appendix Sections 3307.2 and 3307.3 of the Califomia Building
Code, 2001 Edition, are necessary due to geological conditions of rocky,
granular soils which subject cut and fill slopes to rapid erosion. These
modifications are further justified based on the conditions described in
Section B.2. (a) above.
4. The City Clerk shall, and hereby is directed to, forthwith upon the
adoption of this Resolution, file a certified copy of this Resolution,
together with a certified copy of Ordinance No. 693 with the California
Building Standards Commission as required by Section 17958.7 of the
California Health and Safety Code.
§, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
ORDINANCE NO. 693
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS
15.04, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24, 15.28 .aND 15.32, OF TITLE 15,
BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE,
INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1
AND 2", 1997 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO;
THE 2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, INCORPORATING
THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE", 2000 EDITION; THE 2001
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, INCORPORATING THE
"UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE", 2000 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL
APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2001 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL
CODE, INCORPORATING THE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE",
1999 EDITION, INCLUDING THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE PROVISIONS FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE",
1996 EDITION; ALL AS AMENDED BY THE CALIFORNIA
BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION AND CONTAINED IN
PARTS 2 THROUGH 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CODE OF
REGULATIONS; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT
OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS", 1997 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM
HOUSING CODE", 1997 EDITION; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS, ADDITIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS,
INCLUDING FEES AND PENALTIES.
A. RECITALS.
(i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California
Government Code authorizes the adoption, by reference of the Codes
specified in the title of the Ordinance.
(ii) At least one copy of each of said Codes certified as full, true and correct
copies thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have
been filed in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions
of Government Code Section 50022.6.
(iii) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by California Government Code
Section 50022.3, has been conducted and concluded prior to the adopt[on
of this Ordinance.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption ofthis ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
find, determine and ordain as follows:
Ordinance No. 693
Page 2 of 16
SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 2: Chapters 15.04, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24, 15.28 and 15.32
of Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,
entitled Buildings and Construction, of the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga are hereby amended as provided
for herein, provided that said amendments shall not apply to
or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective
date of this Ordinance and provided further that the Uniform
Codes as previously adopted herein by reference and
amended by Ordinance No. 603 of this City shall continue to
be applicable to construction for which permits have been
issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3: Chapter 15.04 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15.04
CODES ADOPTION
Section:
15.04.010 Codes adoption.
15.04.010 Codes adoption.
2001 California Building Code, incorporating the "Uniform Building Code, Volumes 1
and 2", 1997 Edition, including all appendices thereto; the 2001 California
Mechanical Code, incorporating the "Uniform Mechanical Code", 2000 Edition; the
2001 California Plumbing Code, incorporating the "Uniform Plumbing Code", 2000
Edition, including all appendices thereto; the 2001 California Electrical Code,
incorporating the" National Electrical Code ", 1999 Edition, including the "Uniform
Administrative Code Provisions for the National Electrical Code", 1996 Edition; the
"Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Building", 1997 Edition; and the
"Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition; are hereby adopted in their entirety as the
Building and Construction Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, together
with the amendments, deletions, additions, and exceptions set forth in Chapters
15.04, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24, 15.28 and 15.32 below"
SECTION 4: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
Ordinance No. 693
Page 3 of 16
"CHAPTER 15.12
BUILDING CODE
Sections:
15.12.005 Section 105.1 Amended - General.
15.12.010 Section 106.2 Amended - Work exempt from permit.
15.12.020 Section 107.2 Amended - Permit fees.
15.12.030 Section 107.3 Amended - Plan review fees.
15.12.040 Section 107.5.2 Amended - Investigation fees.
15.12.050 Section 108.9 Added - Repeated inspections.
15.12.060 Table 1-A Deleted - Building permit fees.
15.t2.070 Table 15-AAmended - Minimum roof classes.
15.12.080 Appendix Chaptem Deleted.
15.12.090 Appendix Section 3306.2 Amended - Exempted work.
15.12.100 Appendix Section 3307.1 Amended - General.
15.12.110 Appendix Section 3307.2 Added - Protection of adjacent property.
15.12.120 Appendix Section 3307.3 Added - Temporary erosion control.
15.12.130 Appendix Section 3309.3 Deleted - Grading design.
15.12.140 Appendix Section 3309.8 Deleted - Regular grading requirements.
15.12.150 Appendix Section 3309.9 Amended -Issuance.
15.12.160 Appendix Section 3310 Amended - Grading fees.
15.12.170 Appendix Section 3310.2 Deleted- Plan review fees.
15.12.180 Appendix Section 3310.3 Deleted- Grading permit fees.
15.12.190 Appendix Table A-33-A Deleted - Grading plan review fees.
15.12.200 Appendix Table A-33-B Deleted - Grading permit fees.
15.12.005 Section 105.1 Amended - General.
Section 105.1 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
105.1. General.
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determination made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation of this code, there
shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of 3 members and 2
alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining
to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The Building
Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as Secretary to said Board but
shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The Board shall adopt rules of
procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in
writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building Official.
Ordinance No. 693
Page 4 of 16
15.12.010 Section 106.2 Amended - Work exempt from permit.
Section 106.2 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
106.2. Work Exempt from Permit.
A building permit shall not be required for the following:
1. One-story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage sheds,
playhouses, and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120
square feet (11.15m).
2. Wood, chain-link, plastic, metal or similar fences not over 6 feet in height above
the lowest adjacent grade.
3. Oil derricks.
4. Movable cases, counters and Partitions not over 5 feet 9 inches (1753 mm) high.
5. Retaining walls and masonry fences not over 3 feet in height above the lowest
adjacent grade, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II, or III-A
liquids.
6. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000
gallons (18,927L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed
2:1.
7. Platforms, walks and driveways not more than 30 inches (762mm) above grade
and not over any basement or story below.
8. Painting, papering and similar finish work.
9. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery.
10. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group R Division 3, and Group
U Occupancies when projecting not more than 54 inches (1372mm).
11. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R, Division 3 Occupancy in
which the pool walls are entirely above the adjacent grade and if the capacity
does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18 927L).
Unless otherwise exempted, separate plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits
wilJ be required for the above-exempted items.
Exemption from the permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant
authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of
this code or any other ~aws or ordinances of this jurisdiction.
/3?
Ordinance No. 693
Page 5 of 16
15.12.020 Section 107.2 Amended - Permit fees.
Section 107.2 of the Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
107.2. Permit Fees.
The fee for each permit shall be as established by Resolution of the City Council.
The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall
be made by the building official. The value to be used in computing the building
permit and buiiding plan review fees shall be the total value of all construction work
for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical,
plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any
other permanent equipment.
5.12.030 Section 107.3 Amended - Plan review fees.
Section 107.3 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
107.3. Plan Review Fees.
When submittal documents are required by Section 106.3.2, a plan review fee shall
be paid at the time of submitting the submittal documents for plan review. Said plan
review fee shall be as set forth by Resolution of the City Council.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review, an
additional plan review fee shall be charged.
The plan review fees specified in this section are separate fees from the permit fees
specified in Section 107.2 and are in addition to the permit fges.
When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to require additional
plan review or when the project involves deferred submittal items as defined in
Section 106.3.4.2, an additional plan redew fee shall be charged.
15.12.040 Section 107.5.2 Amended - Investigation fees.
Section 107.5.2 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
107.5.2. Investiqation Fees.
An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a
permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the
amount of the permit fee required by this code. The payment of such investigation
fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this
code nor from any penalty prescribed by law.
Ordinance No. 693
Page 6 of 16
15.12.050 Section 108.9 Added - Repeated inspections.
Section 108.9 of the Building Code is herebyadded to road as follows:
108.9. Repeated Reinspections.
In the event that, as related to any one or two family dwelling or any multiple family
building for which a building permit has been issued, and a second reinspection has
been performed in accordance with section 108.8, and further reinspection is
determined by the building official to be necessary to achieve the performance of
accepted construction practices related thereto; or in the event that second
roinspections have been required throe or more times within any project, the building
official shall require posting of a cash deposit to be drawn upon to cover costs of
providing inspection and/or reinspection of the dwelling units(s), or project, on a full
time basis. Further, all inspections for the dwelling units(s), or project shall be
suspended until such time as the deposit is received and judged by the building
official to be sufficient to complete inspection of the work remaining.
The estimated costs of providing this increased level of inspection shall be
determined by the building official in accordance with a Resolution of the City
Council establishing hourly charges. Additionally, the deposit shall be based upon a
reasonable determination of the time necessary to complete the entire building or
project which the dwelling unit or units or multiple-~miiy building is a part.
The expenses incurred by the City in providing additional inspections shall be
deducted from the deposit posted and any remaining balance shall be returned to
the depositor upon completion of the dwelling unit(s) or project. Upon determination
by the building official that the original deposit is insufficient for any remaining
inspection costs an additional cash deposit shall be provided for completion of all
anticipated inspections.
For the purpose of this subsection a "project" is two or more residential buildings
being constructed under separate building permits within or upon an individual tract
map, parcel map or parcel.
5.12.060 Table I-A Deleted - Building permit fees.
Table 1-A-Building Permit Fees of the Building Code is herobydeleted.
15.12.070 Table 15-AAmended - Minimum roof classes.
Table 15-A-Minimum Roof Classes of the Building Code is hereby amended to road as follows:
Ordinance No. 693
Page 7 of 16
TABLE 15-A-
MINIMUM ROOF CLASSES
OCCUPANCY I TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION I
F.R. F.R. One-hour N One-hour N H.T. One-hour N
A-1 B B ..............
A) 2-2.1 B B B -- B -- B B --
A-3 B B B B B B B B B
A-4 B B B B B B B B B
B B B B B B B B B B
E B B B B B B B B B
F B B B B B B B B B
H-1 A A A A ..........
H) 2-3-4-5-6-7 A B B B B B B B B
I) 1.1-1.2-2 A B B -- B -- B B --
I-3 A B B -- B .... B --
M B B B B B B B B B
R-1 B B B B B B B B B
R-3 B B B B B B B B B
S-1, S-3 B B B B B B B B B
S-2, S-5 B B B B B B B B B
S-4 B B B B ..........
U B B B B B B B B B
A -- Class A Roofing.
B -- Class B Roofing.
F.R. -- Fire Resistive.
H.T. -- Heavy Timber.
N -- No Requirements for Fire Resistance, ]/~/~
Ordinance No. 693
Page 8 of 16
15.12.080 Appendix chapters deleted.
Appendix Chapters 3, 3A, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21,23, 30, 31 - Divisions I and II, and
34 of the Building Code are herebydeleted.
15.12.090 Appendix Section 3306.2 Amended - Exempted work.
Appendix Section 3306.2 of the Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3306.2. Exempted Work.
A grading permit is not required for the following:
1. When approved by the Building Official, grading in an isolated, self-contained
area if there is no danger to private or public property.
2. An excavation below finished grade for basements and footings of a building,
retaining wall or other structure authorized by a valid building permit. This shall
not ~xempt any fill made with the material from such excavation or exempt any
excavation having an unsupported height greater than 5 feet (1524mm) after the
completion of such structure.
3. Cemetery graves.
4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other regulations.
5. Excavations for wells or tunnels or utilities.
6. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing or stockpiling of reck, sand, gravel,
aggregate or clay where established and provided for by law, provided such
operations do not affect the lateral support or increase the stresses in or
pressure upon any adjacent or contiguous property.
7. Exploratory excavations under the direction of soil engineers or engineering
geologists.
8. An excavation that (1) is less than 2 feet (610mm) in depth or (2) does not create
a cut slope greater than 5 feet (1524mm) in height and steeper than 1 unit
vertical in 2 units horizontal.
9. A fill less than 1 foot (305mm) in depth and placed on natural terrain with a slope
flatter than 1 unit vertical in 5 units horizontal (20% slope), or less than 3 feet
(914mm) in depth, not intended to support structures, that does not ex;eed 50
cubic yards (38.3m) on anyone lot and does not obstruct a drainage course.
Exemption from the permit requirements of this chapter shall not be deemed to grant
authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of
this chapter or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction.
Ordinance No. 693
Page 9 of 16
15.12.100 Appendix Section 3307.1 Amended - General.
Appendix Section 3307.1 of the Building Code is herabyamended to read as follows:
3307.1. General.
Whenever the building official determines that any existing excavation or
embankment or fill on private property has become a hazard to life and limb, or
endangers property, or adversely affects the safety, use or stability of a public way or
drainage channel, the owner of the property upon which the excavation or fill is
located, or other person or agent in control of said property, upon receipt of notice in
writing from the building official, shall within the period specified therein repair or
eliminate such excavation or embankment to eliminate the hazard and to be in
conformance with the requirements of this code.
15.12.110 Appendix Section 3307.2 -Added - Protection of adJacent property.
Appendix Section 3307.2 of the Building Code is hereby added to read as follows:
3307.2. Protection of Adiacent Property.
During grading operations, the permittee shall be responsible br the prevention of
damage to adjacent property and no person shall excavate on land sufficiently close
to the property line to endanger any adjoining public street, a sidewalk, alley, or other
public or private property without supporting and protecting such property from
settling, cracking, or other damage v,hich might result.
15.12.120 Appendix Section 3307.3 Added - Temporary erosion control.
Appendix Section 3307.3 of the Building Code is herebyadded to read as follows:
3307.3. Temporary Erosion Control.
The permittee shall put into effect and maintain all precautionary measures
necessary to protect adjacent watercourses and public or private property from
damage by erosion, flooding, and deposition of mud or debris origination from the
site.
15.12.130 Appendix Section 3309.3 Deleted - Grading designation.
· Appendix Section 3309.3 of the Building Code is herebydeleted.
15.12.140 Appendix Section 3309.8 Deleted - Regulargrading requirements.
Appendix Section 3309.8 of the Building Code is hereby deleted.
Ordinance No. 693
Page 10 of 16
15.12,150 Appendix Section 3309.9 Amended - Issuance.
Appendix Section 3309.9 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
3309.9. Issuance.
The provisions of Section 106.4 are applicable to grading permits. The building
official may require that grading operations and project designs be modified if delays
occur which incur weather-generated problems not considered at the time the permit
was issued.
15.12.160 Appendix Section 3310 Amended - Grading fees.
Appendix Section 3310 of the Building Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
3310. Gradinq Fees
The fee for each grading plan review and grading permit shall be as established by
Resolution of the City Council.
15.12.170 Appendix Section 3310.2 Deleted - Plan ~view fees.
Appendix Section 3310.2 of the Building Code is heraby deleted.
15.12,180 Appendix Section 3310.3 Deleted- Grading permit fees.
Appendix Section 3310.3 of the Building Code is herebydeleted.
15.12.190 Appendix Table A-33-A Deleted - Grading plan review fees.
Appendix Table A-33-A Grading Plan Review Fees of the Building Code is herebydeleted.
15.12.200 Appendix Table A-33-B Deleted - Grading permit fees.
Appendix Table A-33-B Grading Permit Fees of the Building Code is hereby deleted."
SECTION 5: Chapter 15.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15.16
MECHANICAL CODE
Sections:
15.16.010 Section 110.1 .,N~ended - General.
15.16.020 Section 115.2 Amended - Permit fees.
15.16.030 Section 115.3 Amended - Plan review fees.
15.16.040 Table 1-1 Deleted - Mechanical permit fees. , __
/
Ordinance No. 693
Page 11 of 16
15.16.010 Section 110.1 Amended-General.
Section 110.1 of the Mechanical Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
110.1. General.
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determination made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation of this code, there
shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of 3 members and 2
alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining
to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The Building
Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as Secretary to said Board but
shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The Board shall adopt rules of
procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in
writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building Official.
15.16.020 Section 115.2 Amended - Permit fees.
Section 115.2 of the Mechanical Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
115.2. Permit Fees.
The fee for each permit shall be as established by Resolution of the City Council.
15.16.030 Section 1t5.3 Amended - Plan review fees.
Section 115.3 of the Mechanical Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
115.3. Plan Review Fees.
When Section 115.2 requires submittal documents, a plan review fee shall be paid at
the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall
be as set forth by Resolution of the City Council.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review, an
additional plan review fee shall be charged.
15.16.040 Table 1-1 Deleted - Mechanical permit fees.
Table 1-1-Mechanical Permit Fees of the Mechanical Code is hereby deleted."
SECTION 6: Chapter 15.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15.20
PLUMBING CODE
Ordinance No. 693
Page 12 of 16
Sections:
15.20.010 Section 103.4.1 ,N~ended - Permit fees.
15.20.020 Section 103.4.2 Amended - Plan review fees.
15.20.030 Table 1-1 Deleted - Plumbing permit fees.
15.20.010 Section 103.4.1 Amended - Permit fees.
Section 103.4.1 of the Plumbing Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
103.4.1. Permit Fees.
The fee for each permit shall be as established by Resolution of the City Council.
15.20.020 Section 103.4.2 Amended - Plan review fees.
Section 103.4.2 of the Plumbing Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
103.4.2. Plan Review Fees..
When a plan or other data is required to be submitted by 103.2.2, a plan review fee
shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan
review fee shall be as set forth by Resolution of the City Council.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional review, an
additional review fee shall be charged.
15.20.030 Table 1-1 Deleted - Plumbing permit fees.
Table 1-1 Plumbing Permit Fees of the Plumbing Code is herebydeleted."
SECTION 7: Chapter 15.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15.24
ELECTRICAL CODE
Sections:
1524.010 Section 203.1 Amended- General.
15.24.020 Section 304.1 Amended - Permit fees.
15.24.030 Section 304.2 Amended - Plan review fees.
15.24.040 Table 3-A Deleted - Electrical permit fees.
Ordinance No. 693
Page 13 of 16
15.24.010 Section 203,1 Amended - General.
Section 203.1 of the Electrical Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
203.1. General.
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determination made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation ofthis code, there
shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of 3 members and 2
alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining
to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The Building
Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as Secratary to said Board but
shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The Board shall adopt rules of
procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in
writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building Official.
15.24.020 Section 304.1 Amended - Permit fees.
Section 304.1 of the Electrical Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
304.1. Permit Fees.
The fee for each permit shall be as established by Resolution of the City Council.
15.24.030 Section 304,2 Amended - Plan review fees.
Section 304.2 of the Electrical Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
304.2. Plan Review Fees.
When Section 302.2 requires submittal documents, a plan review fee shall be paid at
the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall
be as set forth by Resolution of the City Council.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional review, an
additional plan review fee shall be charged.
15.24.040 Table 3-A Deleted - Electrical permit fees.
Table 3-A Electrical Permit Fees of the Electrical Code is hereby deleted."
SECTION 8: Chapter 15.28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15.28
CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
Ordinance No. 693
Page 14 of 16
Sections:
15.28.010 Section 205.1 A~nended - General.
15.28.010 Section 205.1 Amended - General.
Section 205.1 of the Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read
as follows:
205.1. General.
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determination made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation of this code, there
shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of 3 members and 2
alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters
pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction.
The Building Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as Secretary to
said Board but shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The Board shall
adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions
and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building Official."
SECTION 9: Chapter 15.28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, as follows:
"CHAPTER 15,32
HOUSING CODE
Sections:
15.32.010 Section 203.1 Amended - General,
15.32.010 Section 203.1 Amended - General.
Section 203.1 of the Housing Code is herebyamended to read as follows:
203.1. General.
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determination made by
the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation ofthis code, there
shall be and is hereby created a Housing Advisory and Appeals Board consisting of
3 members and 2 alternates who are qualified by experience and training to pass
upon matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the
jurisdiction. The Building Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as
Secretary to said Board but shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The
Board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all
decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building
Official. Appeals to the Board shall be processed in accordance with the provisions
contained in Section 1201 of this code. Copies of all rules of procedure adopted by
the Board shall be delivered to the Building Official, who shall make them accessible
to the public."
Ordinance No. 693
Page 15 of 16
SECTION 10: It shall be unlawful for any person, firm partnership, or corporation to
violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements
of this Ordinance or the Codes adopted hereby. Any person, firm,
partnership, or corporation ~iolating any provision of this Ordinance
or the Codes adopted hereby or failing to comply with any of its
requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000'°°) or by imprisonment not exceeding six
(6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person,
firm, partnership or corporation shall be deemed guilty of separate
offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which
any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Codes
adopted hereby is committed, continued or permitted by such person,
firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable
therefore as provided in this Ordinance.
SECTION 11: The violation of anyof the provisions of this Ordinance orthe Codes
adopted hereby shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by
the City through civil process by means of restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided
by law for the abatement of such nuisances.
SECTION 12: The City Council hereby declares that should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance or the Code hereby
adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs,
sentences and words of this Ordinance and the Codes hereby
adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 13: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at
least once in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
TH E CITY OF
I~AN C H 0 CU CAi~I 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: December 4, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING
CHOICE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, which provides an overview of the
laws, regulations, or other obstacles that may affect accessibility to housing.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony
regarding the Analysis of Impediments (Al) to Fair Housing Choice, and adopt the Al thereby
authorizing the Mayor to submit the report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) for their consideration.
BACKGROUND: As a condition to receiving Community Development Block G rant (CDBG) funding
HUD requires the City to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing as required bythe Code of
Federal Regulations (24 CFR 570.601(a)(1)). This certification specifically requires the City "to
assume the responsibility of fair housing planning by conducting an analysis to identify impediments
to fair housing choice within its jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any
impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis."
To address this requirement the City has prepared an Al that provides (1) a comprehensive review
of the City's laws, regulations, administrative policies, procedures, and practices; (2) an assessment'
how those laws, etc., affect location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and (3) an assessment
of conditions affecting fair housing choice in both the public and private sector. The City previously
prepared the Al in 1991, and updated the Al in 1996.
ANALYSIS: The City contracted with Cotton/Bridges/Associates for preparation of the
comprehensive update of the Al. The scope of the analysis and format used in preparation of the Al
adheres to the recommendations contained in the 1998 Fair Housing Planning Guide developed by
HUD. The Al is structured into six sections and includes the Introduction, Community Profile,
Mortgage Lending Practices, Current Fair Housing Profile, Public Policies, and Conclusion and
Actions.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE
December 4, 2002
Page 2
· Chapter 1 - Introduction. This chapter defines "fair housing" and explains the purpose of the
report.
· Chapter 2 - Community Profile. This chapter analyzes the demographic profile, income
distribution, housing stock characteristics, and access to public transportation. This chapter
details the various characteristics that may affect the ability of households with similar income
levels, in the same housing market, to have a like range of housing choices.
· Chapter 3- Mort.qaqe Lendinq Practices. This chapter reviews the lending practices of financial
institutions and the access of minorities and all income groups to obtain home loan financing.
· Chapter 4 - Current Fair Housinq Profile. This chapter provides an overview of the institutional
structure of the housing industry in governing fair housing practices to its members Including fair
housing services available to City residents and recent fair housing complaints, violations, and
suits to determines trends in the City.
· Chapter 5 - Public Policies. This chapter evaluates policies that may affect the pattern of
housing development, availability of housing choices, as well as access to housing. This
includes an evaluation of the General Plan Housing Element and Land Use Element,
Development Code, and CDBG Consolidated Plan to evaluate potential impacts to fair housing
choice and affordable housing development.
· Chapter 6 - Conclusion and Actions. This chapter identifies common problems and barriers to
fair housing. Building on the previous analysis, the chapter outlines actions to address
impediments to fair housing choice.
Notice of the availability of the Al was published on November 4, 2002. The document was made
available for a 30-day public review period. The review period terminates with the City Council
action. As of the writing of this report, no comments regarding the Al have been received.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:TG:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, September 2002
Resolution
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR
HOUSING CHOICE, A REVIEW OF THE FEDERALLY REQUIRED
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE, WHICH
PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAWS, REGULATIONS, OR OTHER
OBSTACLES THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESSIBILITY TO HOUSING.
A. Recitals.
1. The City prepared an Analysis of Impediments (Al) to Fair Housing Choice as described
in the title of this Resolution.
2. On the 4th day of December 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Al and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 4, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. As a condition to receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the Cityto certify that it will
affirmatively further fair housing as required by the Code of Federal Regulations (24 CFR
570.601 (a)(1)); and
b. This certification specifically requires the City "to assume the responsibility of fair
housing planning by conducting an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within its
jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through
that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis"; and
c. The City has prepared an Al that provides (1) a comprehensive review of the City's
laws, regulations, administrative policies, procedures, and practices; (2) an assessment how those
laws, etc., affect location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and (3) an assessment of
conditions affecting fair housing choice in both the public and private sector.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE
December 4, 2002
Page 2
a. The Al is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, Development Code,
and Consolidated Plan; and
b. The City to certifies that it will affirmatively further fair housing as required by the
Code of Federal Regulations (24 CFR 570.601(a)(1)); and
c. This City assumed the responsibility of fair housing planning by conducting an
analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within its jurisdiction, will take appropriate
actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and will
maintain records reflecting the analysis.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this
Council hereby approves the Al and authorizes the Mayor to submit the report to the HUD for their
consideration.
]
]
]
]
]
I
I
!
I
I City of Rancho Cucamonga
i Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
I
I September 2002
I
I City of Rancho Cucamonga
, I Planning Department
10S00 Civic Center Drive
I Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
I
!
I
I Consultant to City:
Cotton/Bridges/Associates
i 747 E. Green Street, Suite #300
Pasadena, CA 91101
I
I
I
8006.00
I
I
!
I
I City of Rancho Cucamonga
I Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice
I
I Table of Contents
Section Page
I 1. Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1
I 1.1 Overview of the City ................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Fair Housing Defined .................................................................. 1-2
1.3 Purpose of the Report ................................................................. 1-3
I 1.4 Organization of Report ............................................................... 1-4
1.5 Report Preparation and Data Sources ......................................... 1
i 1.6 Public Participation ..................................................................... 1-5
2. Jurisdictional Background Data ................................................ 2-1
I 2.1 Demographic Profile ..................................................................
2.2 Household Characteristics ........................................................... 2-9
I 2.3 Income Profile .......................................................................... 2-15
2.4 Housing Profile ......................................................................... 2-19
2.5 Affordable Housing ................................................................... 2-31
I 2.6 Licensed Community Care Facilities .......................................... 2-34
2.7 Accessibility of Public Transit .................................................... 2-39
I
I
Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga Page i-1
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
3. Mortgage Lending Practices ....................................................... 3-1
3.1 Background ................................................................................. 3-1
3.2 Conventional Home ,Loans ..........................................................
3.3 Government-Backed Home Loans ............................................... 3-8
3.4 Lending by Census Tract ........................................................ '....3-10
3.5 Predatory Lending and Housing Fraud ....................................... 3-11
4. Current Fair Housing Profile ...................................................... 4-1
4.1 Fair Housing Practices in the Ownership Housing Market ........... 4-1
4.2 Fair Housing Practices in the Rental Housing Market ................... 4-8
4.2 Fair Housing Services ................................................................. 4-11
4.4 Observations by Public and Private Agencies ............................. 4-1 7
4.4 Hate Crimes .............................................................................. 4-19
" 5. Public Policies ............................................................................ 5-1
5.1 Local Municipal, Building~ Occupancy, Health and Safety Codes5-2
5.2 Public Policies ............................................................................. 5-8
5.3 Moratoriums/Growth Management ........................................... 5-1 1
5.4 Development Fees/Assessments ................................................. 5-1 1
5.5 Community Representation ....................................................... 5-12
6. Conclusions and Adions .................................................................... 6-1
6.1 Potential Impediments ................................................................. 6-1
6.2 Actions .................................................................................... ,...6-4
Appendix A - 2000 HMDA Data
Appendix B- Public Notice
Page i-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Table of Contents
i List of Tables
Table Page
I 2-1 Population Growth Trends by City ................................. '...., ......... 2-2
2-2 Age Characteristics and Trends ................................................... 23
I 2-3 Race and Ethnicity 2-4
2.4 Household Characteristics .............. ........................................... 2-10
2-5 Homeless Service Providers ...................................................... 2-14
I 2-6 Income byTenure ..................................................................... 2-17
2-7 Income by Tenure and Race .................... ~ ................................ 2-18
I 2-8 Income by Household Type ...................................................... 2-18
2-9 Housing Growth ....................................................................... 2-19
2-10 Housing Tenure ....................................................................... 2-20
I 2-11 Housing Stock Mix .................................................................... 2-21
2,12 Unit Size ................................................................................... 2-21
2-13Single-Family and Condominium Home Sales ........................... 2-24
I 2-14'Rental Rates ..............................................................................
2-25
2-15 Housing Affordability -San Bemardino County ........................ .. 2-26
i 2-16 Prevalence of Housing Cost Burden ........................................ '.. 2-28
2-17 Section 8 Voucher Holders by Race/Ethnicity ............................ 2-32
2-18 Assisted Housing ....................................................................... 2-33
I 2-19 Licensed Care Community Facilities ............... : .......................... 2-34
2-20 Major Employers ........................................................................ 2-42
I 3-1 Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications
by Race of Applicant ................................................................... 3-3
i 3-2 Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications
by Income of Applicant ....................... ........................................ 3-4
3-3 Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications
by Race of Applicant ................................................................... 3-5
I 3-4 Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications
by Income of Applicant ............................................................... 3-6
I 3-5 Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications
by Lending Institution ................................................................. 3-7
3-6 Comparison of Conventional and Government Backed Home
Purchase ..................................................................................... 3-9
I 3-7 Comparison of Conventional and Government Backed Home
Improvement .............................................................................. 3-9
I 3-8 Comparison of Conventional Home Purchase by Census Tract. 3-11
!
I
,~nalysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, Choice I
4-1 Typical Examples of Fair Housing Complaints .................... ' ........ 4-14
4-2 Fair Housing Complaints ........................................................... 4-15 I
4-3 Fair Housing Complaints by Race/Ethnicity ................................ 4-16
4-4 Landlord/Tenant Services ........................................................... 4-16 I
4-5 Landlord/Tenant Services by Race and Ethnicity ........................ 4-17
5-1 Residential Development Districts and Development Standards..5-3 I
5-2 Mixed use Opportunities ......................................
List of Figures I
Figure Page I
2-1 Location of Concentrations of Hispanic Residents ....................... 2-6 !
2-2 Location of Concentrations of African American Residents 2-7
2-3 Location of Concentrations of Asian Residents ............................. 2-8
2-4 Median Income ......................................................................... 2-15 I
2-5 Low and Moderate Income Areas .............................................. 2-16
2-6 Median Home Price-Rancho Cucamonga and Surrounding
Communities ............................................................................. 2-23 I
2-7 Housing Age .............................................................................. 2-28
2-8 Affordable Housing Projects ...................................................... 2-35 I
2-9 Transit Access to Community Care Facilities .............................. 2-37
2-10 Transit Access to Community Facilities ...................................... 2-43
2-11 Transit Access to Major Employers ............................................. 2-45 !
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 1-4 City °f Ranch° Cucam°nga I ~ I
I
I
i
I
!
I Chapter 1
I Introduction
I
1.1 Overview of the City
I
lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga,
i located in the western portion of San
Bemardino County, is within close
proximity to Orange, Riverside, and
I Los Angeles counties. Much of the
City's recent housing and
employment growth is attributable to
I this unique location in the region.
i Since its incorporation in 1977, Rancho Cucamonga has developed into a
major urban and employment center for the region. Fueled by growing
employment opportunities as well as easy access to regional transportation
I routes, the City population more than doubled between 1980 and 1990.
The population further increased an additional 26% between 1990 and
2000, gaining more than 26,000 new residents and constructing more
I than 5,700 additional housing units. Along with this new growth, the
community has become more racially and ethnically diverse, with
increases in Hispanic, Black, and Asian populations over the past decade.
I Today, Hispanic residents make up almost 28% of the City population.
i As one of the five most rapidly growing subregional employment centers
within southern California, Rancho Cucamonga gained 12,816 jobs
between 1991 and 1998. This growth in the job market and modest
I increase in housing construction has attracted many new families to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1-1
I
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
City. However, escalating real estate prices have meant that many lower
income
households
are priced out of the market, particularly for newly
created units.
. Much of the City's new housing growth has occurred in the southe, m and I
central portions of the community. The Northtown and Southwest'
Cucamonga neighborhoods, which are part of the historic fabric of the m
city, contain much of the community's older housing stock. The City has
~ focused significant efforts in improving the quality of life in the older
neighborhoods.
However, balancing limited resources between~ I
improvement of the older neighborhoods and development of new
housing to accommodate the populat~ion growth has become an
increasingly challenging act. Overall, housing in the City is in good
condition as less than 12% of the housing stock was constructed before
1970. I
'~ With rapid growth, continuous diversification in demographics and
associated needs, increasing competition for limited housing resources, the m
potential for conflicts among different groups and fair housing concerns
·
arise. With increasing competition, the range of housing choices available
·
for
different
groups may also suffer. This report presents a demographic
profile of the community, assesses the extent of housing needs of specific
groups, and evaluates the availability of a range of housing choices for the
residents. The report also contains an analysis of the conditions in the
private market and public sector that may limit the availability of a range of
housing choices or impede a person's fair access to housing. I
1.2 Fair Housing Defined
~ Equal access to housing is fundamental to each person in meeting essential I
] [ needs and pursuing personal, educational, employment, or other goals.
,~,~L,~t~,~'G Recognizing this fundamental right, the federal and State of California
oppo~ru~rnr governments have both established fair housing as a right protected by law. I
:
Fair housing is a condition in which individuals of similar income levels
in the same housing market have a like range of choice available to
them regardless of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex,
disability, marital status, familial status, source of income, or any other
arbitrary factor.
I
Page 1-2 City of Rancho CucamongaIt/ I
I
i Introduction
i The Federal fair housing laws prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental,
lease or negotiation for real property based on: race, color, religion, sex,
national origin, familial status, and disability. The California fair housing
I laws are built upon the federal laws and add marital status, ancestry,
source of income, and "any arbitrary discrimination" as the, protected
categories under the laws.
i The fair housing equation must be balanced on both sides. On the one
hand, equal access to housing and on the other hand, the availability of a
I range of housing choice. Many factors in the public and private domains
impede equal access to housing or fair housing choice. Impediments to
I fair housing choice are:
[] Any actions, omissions, or decisions taken because of race, color,
I ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial
status, source of income, or any other arbitrary factor which restrict
housing choices or the availability of housing choices; or
I
[] Any actions, omissions, or decisions which have the effect of restricting
i housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis of
race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital
status, familial status, source of income, or any other arbitrary factor.
I To affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity, a community must
work to remove or mitigate impediments to fair housing choice. The City
I of Ranch Cucamonga is dedicated to providing fair housing opportunities
to all of its residents, and ensuring that all applicable laws are complied
with throughout the City.
I
I 1.3 Purpose of Report
This Analysis of Impediments (Al) to Fair Housing Choice provides an
I overview of laws, regulations, conditions or other possible obstacles that
may affect an individual's or a household's access to housing in Rancho
I Cucamonga. The Al involves:
~ A comprehensive review of Rancho Cucamonga's laws, regulations, and
I administrative policies, procedures, and practices;
t~ An assessment of how those laws affect the location, availability, and
I accessibility housing;
of
and
I City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1-3 / ~ (~
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
~ An assessment of conditions, both public and private, affecting fair
housing choice.
The scope of analysis and the format used for this Al adh,ere to
recommendations contained in the 1998 Fair Housing Planning Guide
developed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD).
1.4 Organization of Report
The Al is divided into six chapters as described below:
Chapter 1: Introduction defines "fair housing~ and explains the
purpose of the report.
Chapter 2: Community Profile presents the demographic, housin~
and income characteristics in Rancho Cucamonga. Major
employers and transportation access to job centers are identified.
The relationships among these variables are discussed.
Chapter 3: Mortgage Lending Practices analyses private activities
that may impede fair housing in Rancho Cucamonga.
Chapter 4: Public Policies evaluates private activities that may
impede fair housing choice in Rancho Cucamonga.
Chapter 5: Assessment of Fair Housing Practices evaluates the
fair housing services available to residents and identifies fair housing
complaints and violations in Rancho Cucamonga.
Chapter 6: Findings, Recommendations, and Actions provides
conclusions and recommendations about fair housing in Rancho
Cucamonga.
A signature page that includes the signature of the Mayor of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and a statement certifying that the Al represents
Rancho Cucamonga's official conclusions regarding impediments to fair
housing choice and the actions necessary to address identified
impediments is provided at the end of this report.
Page 1-4 City of Rancho Cucamonga/~3
i Introduction
1.5 Report Preparation and Data Sources
This report, prepared through a collaborative effort between City staff and
I Cotton/Bridges/Associates under contract to the of Rancho
City
Cucamonga, is funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
i administrative funds.
The following data sources were used to complete this Al. Sources of
I specific information are identified in the text, tables, and figures.
.~I 1980, 1990, and 2000 Census
i [] 2000-2004 Rancho Cucamonga Consolidated Plan
[] City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
[] City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Code
I City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element
[] California Department of Finance (DOF) Population & Housing
i Estimates
[] San Bemardino County Housing Authority, Section 8 and Public
Housing data
I gl Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data regarding lending
patterns in 2000 ' ~
~ Dataquick housing sales activity data
I ~1 Surveys of fair housing owners association, rental
agencies,
apartment
advertisements, and social services providers
I'
1.6 Public Participation
I
Approximately 40 public and private agencies either directly or indirectly
i involved with fair housing issues in Rancho Cucamonga were contacted
during the course of research for the Al, including non-profit fair housing
services providers, local housing and social services providers, financial
I institutions, residential developers, and County government agencies.
Two fair housing workshops were conducted on May 22, 2002 for the Al,
I after a direct mailing was sent to approximately 60 agencies. For those
agencies that were unable to attend the workshop, direct outreach was
provided via phone interviews. At the workshop, the Inland Fair Housing
I and Mediation Board (IFHMB) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department provided input and discussed fair housing issues and
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1-5
I
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
impediments. Appropriate input from these agencies has been
incorporated in the Al. I
The Draft Al was available for public review for a period of 30 days.
Copies of the document were made available through the Cit',/of .Rancho I
Cucamonga's Planning Department, Redevelopment A§ency, Chamber of
Commerce, and at the Rancho Cucamon§a Public Library. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
?a§e 1-6 City of P. ancho C,,camon§a ~/I
I
I
i
I
i
I Chapter 2
I CommuniO/Profile
I This chapter' of the Al analyzes the demographic
profile, income distribution, housing stock
I characteristics, and access to public transportation in
Rancho Cucamonga. The location of community
facilities, such as group homes, in relation to Iow and
I moderate-income areas is also analyzed. By assessing
this information, the development of housing patterns
I within the City, in relation to race/ethnicity, income,
and other characteristics can be determined. This
chapter details the various characteristics that may affect the ability of
I' households with similar income levels, in the same housing market, to
have a like range of housing choice.
I
2.1 Demographic Profile
I Examination of demographic characteristics provides some insight
regarding the need for and extent of equal access to housing in a
I community. Factors such as population growth, age characteristics, and
race/ethnicity all help determine a community's housing needs and play a
i role in exploring potential impediments to fair housing choice.
I
I
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
2.1.1 Population Growth
According the 2000 Census, 127,743 people were living in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, representing a 26-percent increase from the 1990
Census population of 101,409 (Table 2-1). Over the past two d~ecades,
the City had been growing faster than the County average and the
neighboring communities, other than Fontana.
Table 2-1: Population Growth Trends
Change Change
Jurisdiction 1980 1990 1980-1990 2000 1990-2000
Fontana 37,111 87,535 +135.9% 128,929 +47.3%
Ontario 88,820 133,179 +49.9% 158,007 +18.6%
Rancho Cucamonga 55,250 101,409 +83.6% 127,743 +26.0%
San Bernardino 118,794 164,164 +38.2% 185,401 +12.9%
Upland 47,647 63,374 +33.0% 68,393 +7.9%
County of San Bernardino 895,016 1,418,380 +58.5% 1,709,434 +20.5%
Source: 198o, 1990, 2000 Census.
2.1.2 Age Distribution
Housing demand is affected by the age characteristics of a community.
Traditionally, young adults prefer apartments, condominiums, and smaller
single-family units that are affordable. Middle-age adults typically prefer
larger homes as they begin to raise families. However, as children leave
home, seniors often prefer smaller, moderate-cost condominiums, and
single-family units with less extensive maintenance needs.
Overall, the median age in the City increased from 29.7 years to 32.2
years, surpassing the County median age of 30.3 years and indicating a
generally aging community (Table 2-2). The largest age groups in the
community continue to be the young adults age 24-44 (33 percent) and
children 5 to 14 years of age (18 percent). This su~ests that Rancho
Cucamonga remains an attractive community for young families and new
homebuyers. However, young families comprised a smaller proportion of
households in 2000 than in 1990, potentially indicating a housing market
that may not be affordable to young families. Older adults ages 45-59
have increased rather significantly in the past ten years. Numerically, this
group almost doubled between 1990 and 2000, sugesting a housing
market that is catered to mature families.
Page 2-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Communily Profile
I The proportion of young adults between 20 and 24 years old has
decreased slightly. This group typically consists of students, recent
I graduates from college, or people who have just entered the job market.
Affordable housing and employment opportunities are needed to retain or
attract this age group to the City.
I Approximately 6 percent of the City population in 2000 (7,788 residents)
was over the age of 65 years; the proportion of elderly residents increased
I gradually over past ten years.
the
i Table 2-2: Age Characteristics and Trends
1990 2000
Age Groups Persons Percent Persons Percent
I Under 5, years 9,423 9.0% 8,900 7.0%
5-14 18,019 17.8% 22,604 17.7%
I 15-19 7,463 7.4% 10,639 8.3%
20-24 7,155 7.1% 8,622 6.7%
i 25-44 39,562 39.0% 42,406 33.2%
I 45-54 9,532 ~ ~ 9.4% 18,391 14.4%
55-59 2,820 2.8% 5,174 4.1%
I 2,310 2.3% 3,219 2.5%
60-64
65-74 3,354 3.3% 4,515 3.5%
I 75-84 1,439 1.4% 2,583 2.0%
85 and over 332 0.3% 690 0.5%
Median 29.7 32.2
I Source: 1990 and 2000 Census.
I 2.1.3 Race and Ethnicity
Rancho Cucamonga, like most communities throughout Southern
I California, has experienced gradual changes in the race and ethnic
composition of its population. According to the Census, White residents
comprise the largest racial/ethnic group in the City, followed by Hispanic
I residents. However, the proportion of White residents has declined
substantially since 1990 from 69 percent to 55 percent as the City
I experienced corresponding increases in residents of other racial and ethnic
backgrounds. The growing ethnic and racial diversity of Rancho
Cucamonga closely mirrors that of San Bernardino County, which has also
!
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-3
Analysis of Imperilments to Fair Housing Choice
experienced an increased proportion of minority residents and a
decreased
proportion of Whites over the past ten years.
Table 2-3: Race and Ethnicity
1990 2000
Race/Ethnicity Persons Percent County Persons Percent County
White 69,546 68.6% 60.8% 70,028 54.8% 44.0%
Hispanic 20,298 20.0% 26.7% 35,491 27.8% 39.2%
Black 5,725 5.6% 7.7% 9,789 7.7% 8.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander 5,260 2.2% 3.9% 7,761 6.0% 4.8%
Native American 424 0.4% 0.7% 405 0.3% 0.6%
All Other* 156 0.2% 0.2% 4,269 3.3% 2.7%
Total 101,409 100% 100% 127,743 100% 100%
*The
2000
Census
has
expanded the 'Other' category to include individuals of more than one race or ethnicity.
Source: U.S. Census 1990, 2000
Minority Population
Concentrations
of
A concentration is defined as any tract with above County average for'a
racial/ethnic group. A high concentration is defined as any tract with at
least twice the County average for a racial/ethnic group. Concentrations
are determined by comparing the tract level percentage of Hispanic
residents (39.2 percent), percentage of Black residents (8.8 percent), and
(4.8 percent) for Asian residents with the Countywide average for that
group. Of the 13 census tracts in Rancho Cucamonga, 8 had minority
concentrations above the County average. Of these tracts, none are
considered to be Iow-moderate income.
Hispanic residents are primarily concentrated between Route 66 (Foothill
Blvd.) and the 10 Freeway. Of the two census tracts with concentrated
Hispanic populations, neither is considered a Iow-moderate income tract,
indicating that the concentrations are not income related (Figure 2-1).
Black residents are concentrated in similar areas as the Hispanic residents
(Figure 2-2). In contrast, Asian residents are concentrated in six contiguous
tracts all located above Foothill Blvd. between East Ave. and Amethyst St.
Page 2-4 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Communi~/ Profile
Degree of Housing Segregation
Demographic and social policy researchers have used the Index of
Dissimilarity as a measure of the degree of racial segregation. The index
measures the proportion of persons in one group who would have to move
(into one census tract with larger proportions of another group) to give
every tract the same racial makeup. An index of 1.0 indicates total
segregation and an index of 0 indicates total integration.
Based on 2000 Census tract level data, the Index of Dissimilarity in
comparison to Whites was 0.20 for Hispanics, 0.25 for Blacks, and 0.22
for Asians. These figures indicate that within the City, the different
racial/ethnic groups are fairly integrated.
,,
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-5
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
16th St ~_L~ B; seline :d ~ BaselineA~
~4th St ' ~ ~ ~ = 4th St ~ ~ San Bemardinc ~.
~u~: 1990, 2~0 U.S. Census
Legend
.... Ci~ Bounda~ ~ Hispanic Household Concen~ation
Census Tra~ Bounda~ (2000) His~nic hou~ld ~ea~r ~an
Census Block Group Bounda~ (2000)
~ Census Tra~ Number (2000) ~ Hispanic Household High Concen~ation
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~iles [o~tion and Concen~ation
~ o o.s ~ ~.s 2 o~ Hispanics
ci~ of Rancho Cu~monga ~ge 2-6
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
,.-I
ONTARIO
IN'I~L AIRPORT
Source: 1990, 2000 U.S. Census
Legend
.... City Boundary ~ African American Household Concentration
Census Tract Boundary (2000) African American househoki ~rea~er ~han
LO~ Angeles County Average (8.79%-17.58%)
Census Block Group Boundary (2000)
~ Census Tract Number (2000) ~ African American Household High Concentration
African American household ~reater than twice
Los Angeles County Average (17.58% and above)
..~ o. ,.2's°°, 5,ooo, ,,5oo, ,o.ooo,~t ~=igure 2-2
~ ~ , , , ,Mil~ Location and Concentration
~r 0 0.5 ~ ~.s 2 of African American
city of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-7
Source: 1990, 2000 U.S. Censu~
Legend I
.... City Boundary ~ Asian/Pacific Islander Household Concentration
Census Tract Boundary (2000) ,Mian/Pacific [slander household greater than
Lo~ Angeles County Average (4.83%-9.66%)
Census Block Group Boundary (2000) I
m Census Tract Number (2000) / Asian/Pacific Islander Household High Concentration
,~ian/Pacific Islander household greater than twice
~ ~ I , I i Miles Location and
Concentration
.~r o o.s ~ ~.s 2 of Asian/Pacific Islander
Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page2-. m
I
i Community Profile
I 2.2 Household Characteristics
A household is defined as all persons occupying a
I housing unit. Families are a subset of households, and
include all persons living together who are related by
i blood, marriage, or adoption. Single households
include persons living alone in housing units, but do
not include persons in group quarters such as
I convalescent homes or dormitories. Other households
are unrelated people living together, such as
roommates.
I This section describes various household characteristics that may aff'ect
access to housing, such as household type and size, income level, and the
I presence of persons with special needs.
I 2.2.1 Household Composition and Size
According to the 2000 Census, 40,863 households resided in Rancho
Among percent were family
Cucamonga.
these
households,
78
households. Among all families,' 34 percent had children under age 1§,
and 26 percent were families without children. "Non-families", which
include single persons and other households, comprised about 22 percent
of the total households in Rancho Cucamonga. The proportion of families
I. with children decreased and this group also experienced the smallest
growth, consistent with the decreased proportion of young families in the
City. "Other~ families, which include single parents with children, are the
I fastest growing category of families since 1990, with a 58-percent increase.
The average household size remained stable, increasing from 3.01 to 3.04.
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-9
i
I
,~nalysls of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
Table 2-4: Household Characteristics
1990 2000
Household Type Households Percent Households Percent Percent Change
Households 33,635 100% .40,863 100% 21.5%
Families 26,160 77.8% 31,827 77.9% 21.7%
Married with Children 13,481 40.1% 13,925 34.1% 3.3%
Married No Children 8,101 24.1% 10,684 26.1% 31.9%
Other Families 4,578 13.6% 7,218 17.7% 57.7%
Non-Families 7,467 22.2% 9,036 22.1% 21.0%
Singles 5,425 16.1% 6,861 16.8% 26.5%
Other 2,042 6.1% 2,169 5.3% 6.2%
Average Household Size 3.01 3.04.
Source: 1990 and 2000 Census.
The following discussion highlights particular characteristics that may affect
individual household's access to 'housing in the community.
Large Households
Large households are defined as hmJing five or more members. Many
large households are families with two or more children, and/or with
extended family members such as grandparents. Large households are a
special needs group because the availability of adequately sized, affordable
housing units is often limited. In order to save for basic necessities such as
food, clothing and medical care, Iow and moderate income large
households typically reside in smaller units, resulting in overcrowding.
Furthermore, families with children, especially those who are renters, may
face discrimination or differential treatment in the housing market. For
example, some landlords may charge such families a higher rent or security
deposit than they normally would, limit the number of children in a
complex or confine them to a specific Iocatign, or choose not to rent to
families with children altogether.
The 2000 Census reported 6,770 ho'useholds in Rancho Cucamonga with
five or more members, an increase of 1,622 from 1990. Of these
households 1,519 (22 percent) were renters and 5,251 (78 percent) were
owners.
Affordability may often be an issue for large households, which tend to be
lower income and pay a higher portion of the income on housing or live in
Page 2-10 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Profile
Overcrowded conditions. Compared to other households, Iow and
moderate-income families are more impacted by high housing costs. In
Rancho Cucamonga, 33 percent of Iow and moderate-income small
families and almost 41 percent of large families had a housing cost burden
in 1990.~ This high incidence of cost burden has contributed to a situation
where 36 percent of Iow and moderate-income large renter families lived
in overcrowded conditions. With the increase in families and escalating
housing costs in recent years, the extent of overcrowding has persisted. In
1990, 5.5 percent of the households were overcrowded. In 2000,
overcrowding to 7.5 percent
increased
of
all
households.
Single-Parent Households
Single-parent households often require special consideration and
assistance as a result of their greater need for affordable housing and
accessible day care, health care, and other supportive services. Because of
their relatively lower income and higher living expenses, single-parent
households have limited opportunities for finding affordable, decent, and
safe housing. Single-parent households, especially single mothers, may
also be discriminated against in the rental housing market. At times,
landlords may be concerned about the ability of such households to make
regular rent payments and therefore, may require more stringent credit
checks for women.
In 2000, an estimated 3,229 female-headed family households with
children under age 18 lived in the City, representing approximately 8
percent of all households. Although less prevalent, 1,105 households (3
percent) in Rancho Cucamonga were composed of male-headed families
with children under 18. Single-parent families with children are a
age
particularly vulnerable group because they must balance the needs of their
children with work responsibilities. As a result of their traditionally lower
income levels, female-headed households are particularly impacted by
poverty. In 2000, 1,574 families were estimated as living below the
poverty level, 41% of which were represented by female-householders
with no husband present and children under 18.
~ A household paying more than 30% of its gross household income is considered to have a housing cost
burden.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-11
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Disabled Persons
In 2000,. Rancho Cucamonga was home to an estimated 17,292 disabled
persons (13.5 percent of the population).. Disabilities are defined as
mental, physical or health conditions that last over six months. Although
no current comparison of disability with income, household size, or
race/ethnicity is available, a substantial portion of disabled persons
statewide earn lower incomes, particularly if the disability prevents them
from working. Census data from 1997 indicates that persons with
disabilities
earn less than $32,000 a year, with a majority earning below
$25,000. Furthermore, persons with self-care and mobility limitations may
require special housing design features such as wheelchair ramps, holding
bars, special bathroom designs, wider doors, and other design features.
Persons with disabilities may be discriminated against in the housing
market because of their need for wheelchairs, home modifications to
improve accessibility, or other forms of assistance. More common
examples of discrimination, against persons with physical and/or other
limitations include: refusing to rent to a person in a wheelchair for fear a
unit might be damaged; and prohibiting service/guide dogs of disabled
applicants because of a no-pet policy. ~
Persons with HIV/AIDS
·
Persons with HIV/AIDS sometimes face biases and misunderstanding about
their illness that affect their access to housing. Such persons may also be
targets for hate crimes. According to the San Bernardino County Public
Health Department, 132 HIV/AIDS cases 'were reported for Rancho
Cucamonga and 3,137 cases for all of San Bernardino County from 1983
through August 7, 2002. Following is the ethnic breakdown of the cases
reported in Rancho Cucamonga: 50 percent White residents, 27 percent II
Hispanics, 19 percent Black, 3 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, and 2
I
percent Native American/Alaskan. San Bemardino County's ethnic break
down is the same (27 percent) for Hispanic residents, 46 percent for White II
residents, 24 percent for Black ,residents, and I percent for both
Asian/Pacific Islander and Native American/Alaskan residents.
Two facilities in the West [nd service area provide assistance to persons
with AIDS or Symptomatic HIV Disease. lhe Foothill AIDS Proiect
provides life care services including medical care, food assistance, group
counseling, transportation, and in-house services. They do not, however,
provide housing assistance. The Inland AIDS Project (lAP) provides case I
Page 2-12 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
I
i Community Profile
management as well as shelter assistance. Clients who are homeless are
I appropriate community-based resources, provides a
referred
to
lAP
also
residential AIDS shelter where residents receive home health, social and
i mental health services from community providers. The Residential AIDS
Shelter is a group residence under Contract with the State Office on AIDS
to provide housing and food to homeless persons with AIDS or
I Symptomatic HIV disease. The facility has eight beds available, lAP works
closely with hospital discharge planners to ensure that persons with
AIDS/HIV who are returning to the community receive appropriate
I supportive housing in order to homelessness.
prevent
Homeless Persons
I
Homeless persons often have a difficult time finding housing. For those
I who have gone through a transitional housing or other assistance program,
not only is the availability of affordable housing an issue, but some
landlords may be unwilling to rent to someone who was formerly
I homeless. These difficulties may be even greater for homeless families that
need larger affordable units to accommodate children.
I used in the formulation Consolidated Plan
Surveys
of,the
City's
2000-2004
identified between 25 and 156 homeless in the City at any one time, with
i a majority being Hispanic males.
The San 8ernardino County Homeless Coalition conducted a survey of
I. homeless service providers in the West End of the County in March of
2001. While none of the providers responded was located in Rancho
Cucamonga, the results indicated 695 persons (including 268 children)
were assisted by service providers in nearby cities (Ontario, Upland, and
Pomona). In addition, the Transitional Assistance Department in Ontario
reported serving 516 families.
Table 2-5 lists several local and regional homeless service providers in the
area that provide housing, supportive services and food and clothing to
residents in need. The City currently provides assistance to a variety of
organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term
I shelter.
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-13
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
2-5: Homeless Service Providers - Rancho Cucamonga and Surrounding Areas
Table
Target
Name Address Beds Population Services
Pomona Valley 635 South Taylor 17 Single men, Emergency shelter, transitional
Council of Churches Ave. women and housing 6mo-lyr, permanent
Ontario, CA 91761 families housing, day shelter, food,
counseling, preventative
assistance, outreach
House of Ruth P.O. Box 457 20 Battered 30- day emergency Shelter,
Claremont, CA women and transitional housing, day
91711. children shelter, food, counseling
preventative assistance,
outreach
Foothill Family 167 N. 3rd Ave. and 8 units Families/ 90- day transitional housing,
Shelter 230 & 238 N. San 32 beds women with 'vouchers preventative
Antonio Ave. children assistance, counseling,
Upland, CA 91786 outreach
Salvation Army 845 Kingman St. 70 Men, Vouchers, food, preventative
San Bernardino women, and assistance
children
S.B. County 590 N. Sierra Way 60 Homeless Emergency Shelter, transitional
Homeless Mentally San Bernardino who are housing
III Program CA 92402 mentally ill
Source: City of Rancho Cucarnonga 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan San Bernardino County Social Service Directory
Recognizing Discrimination
Housing discrimination is rarely blatant. Often, many people may not be
aware of their fair housing rights, and may not even know that their rights
are being violated. Below are some examples that are indicative of
discrimination, which special needs groups might encounter when looking
for housing.
-~-] "We don't have any services available for people in wheelchairs."
:-~- '~'our children wont have anyone to play with here."
~'] "1 would love to have you as a tenant but you have a seeing-eye dog
and we have a strict 'No Pets' policy."
:-; "There isnt anybody else here ~,ho speaks Spanish so you might feel
uncomfortable living here."
['~- "We don't have any units in your price range."
['; "We dont make loans in the area where the house you are buying is
located."
Page 2-14 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Profile
2.3 Income Profile
Household income is the most important factor affecting housing
opportunity, determining a household's ability to balance housing costs
with basic necessities of life. While economic factors that affect housing
choices are not fair housing issues per se, the relationships among
Figure2-4: Median Household Income household income, household
type, race/ethnicity, and other
$70, ooo factors often create misconceptions
and biases that raise fair housing
$60,000
concerns.
$50,000
$40,00o According to the 2000 Census,
$3o, ooo Rancho Cucar~onga residents
earned a median household
$2o, ooo. income of $60,931, the highest in
$1o, ooo. the area and 32 percent more than
$o they earned in 1990 and 45
Rancho Ontario Upland Fontana San County percent more than th~ County
Cucamonga Bernardino median of $42,066.
In analyzing the income distribution, households are grouped into different
income in relation to the County Median Family Income (MFI) and
groups
adjusted for household size. The five categories are:
~1 Extremely Low Income (0-30 percent of County MFI)
[] Low Income (31-50 percent of County MFI)
[] Moderate Income (51-80 percent of County MFI)
~ Middle Income (81-95 percent of County MFI)
~] Upper Income (>95 percent of County MFI)
Two census tracts in the City had more than 5,1 percent Iow and
moderate-income households in 1990 (Figure 2-5). (Income data by
census not yet
tract
is
available).
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-15
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
,"1
Wilson Ave SL ~
Foothill Blvd ~ ~ ~ ~
trow H Arrow Rt ~ ~ trow Rt
m ~ --
4thSt ~ ~ ~ ! [ I 4th St :~ ~ San Bemardlno ~ve
Holt BIw t,
I ONq ARIO
Mi! tion 8 ~ It~t~l. AIRPORT I
Source: 1000~ 2000 U.S. Census
[e§end I
.... Ci~ Boundary I [-ow Moderate
Income Areas (1090)
Census lract Boundary (2000) I[ow and Moderate Income
-- Census Block Group Boundary (2000) Concentration isdefined as ·
any census blockgroup with
I
m Census Tract Number (2000) morethan 33.07% Iowand
moderate income population)
_;~. o 2,500 s,ooo 7,soo 1o,ooo Figure 2-..5 ·
m m: , , , F~t Low and ~4oderate
1
~r o o.s : :.$ ~ Income Concent:ration$
Cit7 of Rancho Cucamon§a Pa§e 2-16 ~
1
Communi~ Profile
Within Rancho Cucamonga, income levels vary depending on a number of
household characteristics including: tenure, race/ethnicity of householder,
and household type.
Income by Tenure and Household Type
In general, most people living in Rancho Cucamonga earned 95 percent or
more ($47,786+ annually) of the County MFI (Table 2-6). However,
income differences by tenure (owner versus renter) were apparent among
groups (Table 2-7). Comparing percentage renters to
certain
ethnic
the
of
owners across ethnicity while controlling for income status, the majority of
Black households rented rather than owned their homes, while the
majority of Asian households tended to own.
In Rancho Cucamonga, household income varies greatly by household
type. According to the CHAS data, small families and senior households
comprised the majority of the lower and moderate-income households.
"Other" households consist of non-senior living alone or unrelated
persons
persons living together, such as students and roommates. One quarter of
all "other" households in the community earned Iow and moderate
incomes. Households with lower,. and particularly extremely Iow incomes,
are more likely to be at risk of spending a significant portion of the
incomes on housing or live in overcrowded conditions.
Table 2-6: Income Distribution by Tenure
Percent of
County
Income Group MFI Income Threshold Total Renters Owners
Extremely Low 0-30% $0- $15,090 4.6% 8.8% 2.8%
Low 31-50% $15,593- $25,150 5.8% 10.6% 3.9%
Moderate 51-80% $25,653- $40,240 10.8% 18.4%; 7.5%
Middle 81-95% $40,743- $47,785 6.5% 9.3% 5.3%
Upper 95+% $47,786+ 72.4% 52.9% 80.6%
Total 100% 100% 100%
*Note: San Bernardino County re ion Median Family Income (MFI) is $50 300 based on Department of
Housing and Community Development and federal Department of Housing and Urban Development
standards 2002.
Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 1999 based on the Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS) databook development by HUD in 1993.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Pa§e 2-17
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
Table 2-7: Household Income by Tenure and Race I
Rac Ethn city 10-30% 131-50% 151-80% 181-95% I 9s+%
White I
Renter 51.3% 45.8% 44.5% 40.0% I 19.8%
I
Owner 48.7% . 54.2% 55.5% 60.0% 80.2% I
Black
Owner 22.5% 38.8% 16.6% 31.5% 83.4%
Hispanic~ I
Renter 62.6% I 55.0% -58.2% 42:8% 21.2%
Owner 37.4%I 45.0% 43.8% 57.2% 78.8% ~
·
Native American
Renter I 70:4% 0'0% 32'0%138'5% 34'6%' I
Owner 29.6% 100.0% 68.0% 61.5% 65.4%
Asian
·
Renter 30.8% i 39.0% 17.4% 12.2% I 11.6% I
Owner 69.2% 61.0% 82.6% 87.8%I 88.4%
Other I
Owner 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 73.7%
Source: CH,~ Database, 1993.
Table 2-8: Income by Household Type I
Extremely Low Low Moderate Total Low/Mod
Household Type (0-30%) (31-50%) (51-80%) Income m ,
I
Seniors (62 and over) 30.3% 31.6% 21.4% 26.0%
Small Related (2-4) 39.0% 36.4% 40.9% 39.3% ~
I
Large Related (5+) 8.8% 12.7% 18.7% 14.9%
All Other Households 21.9% ! 19.4% 19.0% 19.7%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% m
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) database, 1993.
I
I
I
Page 2-18 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
I
i Community Profile
2.4 Housing Profile
A discussion of fair housing choice must be preceded by an assessment of
I the housing market in question. This section provides an overview of the
characteristics of the local and regional housing markets.
I
A typical single-family home in A muki-family apartment complex Typical town horn~ in Rancho
I Rancho Cucamonga in Rancho CucamonRa Cucamon~a
A housing unit is defined as a house, an apartment, or a single room,
I occupied as a separate living quarter or, if vacant, intended for occupancy
as a separate living quarter. Separate living quarters are those in which the
occupants live separately from any other persons in the building and which
I have direct access from the outside of the building or through a common
hall. ' '
I 2.4.1 Housing Growth
I. Rancho Cucamonga is one of the fastest growing communities in the
County, gaining 26,334 residents, an increase of around 25 percent, over
the past decade. Over the same time period, the housing stock increased
I by 16 percent to 42,134 units in 2000 (Table 2-9).
i Table 2-9: Housing Growth
]urisdiction 1990 2000 % Change
Fontana 29,383 35,908 22.2%
I Ontario 42,536 45,182 6.2%
Rancho Cucamonga 36,367 42,134 15.9%
I San Bernardino 58,804 63,535 8%
Upland 24,496 25,467 4%
I San Bernardino County 542,332 601,369 10.9%
Source: 1990 and 2000 Census.
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-19
"
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
During the 1990s, housing production in Rancho Cucamonga outpaced
the growth experienced by the County as well as many nearby
commu.nities. According to SCAG, Rancho Cucamonga's growth potential
should continue through the next decade, but at a much slower rate than
present.
2.4.2 Tenure
The tenure distribution (owner versus renter) of a community's ho~Jsing
stock influences several aspects of the local housing market. Residential
mobility is influenced by tenure, with ownership housing evidencing a
much lower turnover rate than rental housing. Housing cost burden is
generally more' prevalent among renters than among owners. .Tenure'
preferences are primarily related to household income, composition, and
age of the householder.
Table 2-10: Housing Tenure [ While there has been some
2000 growth in the housing stock,
1990 the tenure composition within
Tenure Number % Number % the City remained relatively
Total Occupied 33,635 92.0% 40,863 97.0% constant At the same time,
Owner Occupied 23,638 70.3% 28,702 7012% the occupancy rate in the City
Renter Occupied 9,997 29.7% 12,161 29.8% increased, indicating a tight
Vacancy Rate 3.6%owner I 2% owner housing market. Local and
10.5 renter 4.1% renter regional economic growth has
Source: 1990 and 2000 Census led to an influx of new
residents into the community
and a corresponding high demand for new homes, resulting in a high
occupancy rate. According to the.2000 Census, 97 percent of the units
were occupied and vacancy rate was 1.2 percent among ownership
housing and 4.1 percent among rental housing, lower than the industry
standard of 2-3 percent for ownership housing and 5-6 percent for rental
housing.
2.4.3 Housing Type ,
Slight changes have occurred within the composition of the housing stock
in Rancho Cucamonga over the past decade. Single-family detached units
continue to comprise the majority of the housing stock, with the
proportion of these homes increasing from 67 percent to 69 percent.
While increasing in numbers,single-family attached homes and multi-
Page 2-20 City °f Ranch° Cucam°nga ~ ~//
I
i Community Profile
family housing decreased in proportional share of the housing stock. The
I mobile home stock shrank in both numbers and in proportion.
I Table 2-11: Housing Stock Mix: 1990 and 2000
1990 2OOO
Housing Type No. of Units % of Total No. of Units % of Total
I Single-Family Detached 24,527 67.4% 29,286 69.4%
Single-Family Attached 2,238 6.2% 2,538 6.0%
I Total Single-Family 26,765 73.6% 31,824
75.4*/.
Multi-Family 2-4 Units 1,266 3.5% 1,798 4.3%
i Multi-Family 5+ Units 6,810 18.7% 7,232 17.1%
Total Multi-Family 8,076 22.2% 9,030 21.4%
Mobile Homes & Other 1,526 4.2% 1,375 3.2%
I Total Units 36,367 100% 42,229 100%
Note: Figures for the housing stock mix in 2000 are :)rovided by the 2000 Census saff ~le dateset and do not,
total to 42,134 units (100% count) due to weightings used.
I Source: 1990 and 2000 Census.
I Table 2-12: Unit Size According to the 2000 Census, over half of the units
Rooms Total Percentage in Rancho Cucamonga"had six or more rooms, the
size of a b/pica! three-bedroom unit. Considering
I that 6,770 large households resided in the City, the
1
730
1.7%
2 1,909 4.5% housing stock should include an adequate supply of
i 3 3,725 8.8% large units to accommodate the needs of larger
4 4,749 11.2% households (in numeric terms). However, since
5 7,799 18.5% overall growth of the City and the region has pushed
I 6 19.2% real estate prices to increasingly higher grounds,
8,110
7 7,297 17.3% finding affordable housing of adequate size may be a
challenging task for many households, particularly
I 8 4,600 10.9% those of lower and moderate incomes.
9+ 3,310 7.8%
Total 42,229 100%
I Median 5.8
Note: Figures for the housing stock mix
I in 2000 are provided by the 2000
Census sample dateset and do not total
to 42,134 units (100% count) due to
weightings used.
I Source: 2000 Census
Although there is an adequate supply of
larger homes in Ranch Cucamonga,
I finding housing that is affordable may be
a barrier for some larRer households.
I Ci~/of ~ncho Cucamonga ,age 2-2i ~~
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
2.4.4 Overcrowding
Overcrowding occurs when housing costs are so high (relative to income)
that families have to reside in small units or double- up to devote income
to other basic needs such as food and' medical care. Overcrowding also
tends to result in increased traffic, deterioration of homes, and may lead to
a shortage of on-site parking in a particular area. Maintaining a reasonable
level of occupancy and alleviating overcrowding is an important
contributor to quality of life.
Generally speaking, Rancho Cucamonga does not have a serious
overcrowding problem. In 2000, overcrowding affected approximately
3,052 (7.5 percent) of the households. Overcrowding typically varies with'
tenure, with a higher proportion of renter:households: than owner-
households experiencing overcrowded conditions.
2.4.5 Housing Cost and Affordability
Housing problems are directly related to the cost of housing in a
community. If housing costs are high relative to household income, a
correspondingly high prevalence of housing problems occurs. This section
evaluates the affordability of the housing stock in Rancho Cucamonga to
Iow and moderate- income households. An emphasis must be made that
housing affordability alone is not necessarily a fair housing issue. Only
when housing affordability issues interact with other factors covered under
the
fair
housing laws, such as household type, composition, and
race/ethnicity that fair housing concerns may arise.
Owner-Occupied Housing
Rancho Cucamonga is situated within close proximity to Orange, Los
Angeles, and Riverside Counties. Housing in Rancho Cucamonga is
moderately priced. According to information from the California
Association of Realtors, the median home price in Rancho Cucamonga in
the last quarter of 2001 was $212,750, 33 percent higher than the median
home price of $142,000 in San Bernardino County. In comparison, home
prices in Rancho Cucamonga were 40 percent lower than the Orange
County median price of $298,000, and 8 percent lower than the Los
Angeles County median of $231,500, but were 20 percent higher than the
median price in the surrounding County of Riverside ($170,000).
Page 2-22 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Community Profile
I
The median home price in Rancho Cucamonga is the second highest
I among neighboring communities, with UPland containing the most
expensive housing stock. Ontario and Fontana had noticeably lower home
i sales prices, while the City of San Bernardino had the lowest home prices
in the area (Figure 2-6). Between the first and last quarters of 2001, home
prices increased in Rancho Cucamonga and in all deighboring
I communities, with Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana exhibiting the largest
increase.
I Figure 2-6: Median Home Sale Prices
$250,000
I $200,000
I $150,000
$100,000
I $50,000
$-
I Rancho Ontario Upland Fontana San County
Cucarr~nga Bernardino
I Reflecting the City's strong real estate market, over 2,012 single-family
homes sales were recorded in Rancho Cucamonga from 2001 to the
beginning of March 2002. The price for homes ranged from a median
I price of $189,000 to more than $950,000 depending on size, amenities,
and location. The average home price in the City was $209,699 with a
median recorded price of $212,750 (Table 2-13). Almost 82 percent of all
I single-family home sales in the community were comprised of three- and
four-bedroom units.
I Though fewer in sales (201 units), condominiums represent an alternative
source of lower cost ownership opportunities in Rancho Cucamonga.
I Median prices for condominiums ranged from $72,500 for a one-bedroom
unit to $164,500 for a four-bedroom unit. The majority of condominiums
sold in 2001 were two- and three-bedroom units.
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-23
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Table 2-13: Single-Family and Condominium Home Sales
Type Bedrooms Units Price Range Average Median
1 10 $56,000 - $190,000 $99,600 $70,500
2 285 $45,000- $610,000 $138,210 $129,000
3 998 $49,500- $600,000 $196,483 $185,000 ~
Homes
4 658 $49,000- $639,000 $249,700 $235,000
5 57 $18,000- $950,000 $333,498 $325,000
6+ 4 $298,000-$628,500 $531,625 $600,000
Total -- 2,012 $18,000-$950,000 $209,699 $189,000
1 2 $70,000-$75,000 $72,500 $72,500
2 116 $75,909-$215,000 $125,762 $125,000
Condos
3 77 $115,000-$227,000 $157,255 $153,500
4 6 $130,000-$180,000 $161,667 $164,500
Total 201 $70,000-$227,000 $138,369 $135,000
Source: Data~ JJCk (2001)
Renter-Occupied Housing
Information on rental rates in Ran~h~) Cucamonga was obtained from a
surveyed conducted by the City in 2000 and a review of advertisements in
the Daily Bulletin over a four-week period in 2002 (March 3 - March 24,
2002). In 2000, the City conducted a survey 38 multi-family complexes
totaling 8,260 units. Rental rates were generally higher than those
advertised for rents in 2002. However, these rates represented the rental
rates for all units in a complex, regardless Of availability.
In 2002, as part of the Al development, rental
advertisements were reviewed. The majority of rental
advertisements (approximately 80 ads over 4 weeks)
were for single-family homes (51 percent) followed by
apartment rentals (36 percent), and condos/town-
homes (13 perc. ent). Rental prices for apartments
ranged from $650 for a one-bedroom apartment up to
$975 for a two-bedroom apartment. The median
price for an apartment rental was $795 (Table 2-14).
The majority of apartment units advertised for rent were one- and two-
bedroom units, without any advertisements for three bedrooms or larger.
Most single-family home rentals were three- and four-bedroom homes
Page 2~24 City °' Ranch° Cucam°nga I ~
i Communily Profile
renting in significantly higher prices than apartment units. The median
I advertised rent for all single-family homes was $1,300, with rental prices
ranging from $685 to $2,250. Condos/Town-homes ranged from $1,095
i to $1,535, depending on unit size, with a median price of $1,150. No
mobile home was advertised for rents during the four-week period
surveyed for Rancho Cucamonga or any other surrounding city. '
I Table 2-14: Rental Rates
i Apartments Condos/Townhomes Single-Family
#of Bedrooms 2000 2002 2002 2002
Bachelor $600 - $650
I ! One $710 - $850 $650 - $920 -- $685
Two $820 - $1,245 $795 - $975 $1,095 - $1,100 $975 - $1,300
I Three $850 - $1,475 -- $1200 - $1,535 $950 - $1,775
Four ...... $1,100 - $2,200
Five ..... $2,250
I Median -- $795 $1,150 $1,300
Sources: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2000-2004 Housing Element and the Inland Valley Oailey Bulletin,
i 03/03/02-03/24/02
Housing Affordability
I Housing affordability can be inferred by
comparing the cost of housing in Rancho
I Cucamonga with the maximum housing
' costs affordable to households of different
income levels. This information can
I provide a picture can
of
who
afford
what
size and type of housing, as well as
indicate the type of households that
' would likely experience overcrowding or
burden on housing cost.
I The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducts
annual household income surveys for the Riverside-San Bernardino
I metropolitan area. These income are adjusted for differences in
surveys
the size of a family. HUD uses these income levels to determine the
maximum amount that a household can pay for housing and their
I eligibility for federal housing assistance. Estimates of affordable housing
costs based on the Federal standard of no more than 30 percent of the
I gross household income are presented in Table 2-15.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-25
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Table 2-15: Housing Affordability- San Bernardino County 2002
inc0meGroup Inc°me Levels I H°uslngC°sts I MaximumAff°rdable Price
Income Payment Utilities Taxes & Ins. Home Rental
Very Low
One Person $17,600I $440 $50 $200[ $30,193 $390
Small Family $22,650 $566 $100 $200 $42,309 $466
Large Family $27,150 $679 $150 $200 $52,241 $529
Low
One Person I $28,150 $704 $50 $200 $72,140 $654
r
Small Family $36,200 $905 $100 $200 $96,140 $805
Large Family $43,450 $1,086 $150 $200 $116,996 $936
Moderate
One Person $42,250 $1,056 $50 $200 $128,120 I $1,006
Small Family $54,300 $1,358 $100 $200 $168,046~ $1,258
Large Family $65,200 $1,630 $150 $200 $203,403 $1,480
Notations:
1. Small Family -- 3 persons; Large Families -- 5 or more persons
2. Utility costs for renters assumed at $50J$100/$150 per month 1
3. Monthly affordable rent based on payments of no more than 30% of household income
4. Property taxes and insurance based on averages for the region
5. Calculation of affordable home sales prices based on a down payment of 10%, annual interest rate of 7.5%,
30- year mortgage, and monthly payment of gross household income
Moderate Income: Typically, moderate-income households in the
Riverside-San Bemardino area can afford the median price of one and
two-bedroom single-family homes and most condominium units in Rancho
Cucamonga. However, based on sales data, larger families are unable to
afford the price of larger single-family homes and condominiums in the
community. In terms of the rental market, depending on family size,
moderate-income households are able to afford rents of up to $1,480 per
month. With the exception of a few large homes, the rental prices of all
and most condos/town-homes and single-family rentals in
apartments
Rancho Cucamonga are within this affordability level.
Lower Income: Lower income households have fewer housing options in
the community. With a median home price of $212,750, lower income
households typically cannot afford to own homes in the City. Only a
limited number of older, smaller units may be affordable to this group.
With rental rates ranging from $650-$975 for an apartment and $685-
$2,250 for single-family homes, most Iow- income households can barely
Page 2-26 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Community Profile
I
afford to rent apartments, and generally cannot afford single-family homes
I or condos/town-homes in Rancho Cucamonga.
i As for very Iow income households, most cannot afford to rent'either
apartments or condos/town-homes or single-family homes in Rancho
Cucamonga without experiencing a burden on housing cost. Specifically,
I large households with-very Iow incomes are disproportionately impacted
by housing problems.
I Cost Burden
Housln§
i State and federal standards establish that a household is experiencing a
burdening housing cost if it spends more than 30 percent of its gross
income on housing. Cost burden typically occurs when housing costs
I increase faster than income.
Expanding regional economic opportunities coupled with the escalating i
I home prices in Orange and Los Angeles Counties have led people to
many
seek homes in more affordable areas. As the City absorbs the increasing
regional demand for housing from Orange and Los Angeles Counties,
I home values in Rancho Cucamonga have escalated beyond the growth in
household income and housing cost burden has become a rising issue
i among lower and moderate-income households in the City. While
housing affordability in itself is not a fair housing issue, to the extent l~at
housing cost burden is disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable
I members of a community, particularly those with special needs, the
question of access to a range of housing choices arises.
I According to the 2000 Census, 35 of the
approximately
percent
owners
and 3§ percent of the renters in Rancho Cucamonga had a housing cost
i burden. The prevalence of housing cost burden varies significantly by
income, household type and size. Based on the 1990 Census, a
considerably higher proportion of Iow and moderate-income senior
I households (83 percent) had housing cost burden compared to all
households in the community (39 percent) and all senior households (40
percent) (see Table 2-16).
I Renters of all family types generally experienced cost burden more than
owner households. However, seniors that rented their homes were
I particularly vulnerable, with 75 percent being burdened by high cost of
housing.
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-27
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
I
Table 2-16: Prevalence of Housing Cost Burden I
Owner Renter Low/Mod Income
Family Type All Households Households Households Households I
Total 39% 37% 43% 41%
Seniors 40% 32% 75% 83%
Small Families 37% ' 35% 41% 33% I
Large Families 41% 40% 45% 41%
· . Others 42% 45% 39% 44% I
Source: Comprehensive Housin§Affordability Strategy database, 2001.
2.4.6 Housing Condition I
Housing age is an important indicator of housing condition within a I
community. Housing is subject to gradual deterioration over time.
Deteriorating housing can depress neighboring property values, discourage
reinvestment, and eventually impact the quality of life in a neighborhood. I
Figure 2-7: Housing Age I
4o%.
35%' I
30%-
25%- I
20%-
15%-
o%~ i
1939 or 1940-59 1960-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-Mar 00
Earlier
I
A general rule in the housing industry is that structures o der than 30 years
typically begin to show signs of deterioration and require major I
reinvestments to maintain quality. Although much of the housing stock in
Rancho Cucamonga was constructed within the last 20 years, the
community has about 13 percent of the housing stock that is 30 years and I
older.
I
Page 2-28 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Communily Prof'de
While the housing stock is relatively new, some areas have concentrations
of housing built prior to 1940. The areas also tend to have a higher
concentration of lower-income households. The City estimated about 11
percent of Iow- and moderate-income renter units and 4 percent of the
Iow- and moderate income owner-occupied units to be substandard.
The City facilitates owner and rental housing rehabilitation and improves
neighborhood conditions through the following programs:
[] Home Improvement Grant: Eligible applicants may receive grants ,of
up to $7,500 or deferred loans of up to $30,000 for improvements on
a single-family home or mobile home.
[] Deferred Payment Loan: Senior citizens,- very Iow-income households,
and persons with disabilities may receive a zero interest loan of up to
$30,000. Consideration may also be given to other Iow-income
households who do not fall within one of the categories above. No
monthly payment is required and the full amount of the loan must be
repaid upon sale or transfer of ownership of the home.
[] Oldtimer's Foundation: The City contracts with the Oldtimer's
Foundation to provide assistance for minor or emergency home
repairs. A maximum grant of up to $100 per visit, with a maximum of
two visits, is available to eligible Iow-income and senior homeowners.
Home repairs permitted include minor plumbing, electrical, carpent~,
and roof repairs.
[] Count/ HOME Consortium: the City participates in the County's
HOME program, which provides funding for Iow interest loans to
acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental property in exchange for
affordable rental units. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation
efforts, a maximum up to $25,000 per
with
of
unit
[] Redevelopment Agency: The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency has also entered into public/private partnerships with the
Southern California Housing Development Corporation ("SCHDC")
and Northtown Housing Development Corporation ("NHDC~) to
purchase and restrict units as affordable for at least 30 years. An
acquisition and rehabilitation program is available to the Northtown
neighborhood, where NHDC purchases and rehabilitates homes,
target
and then sells/rents them to Iow-income households. New homes are
also constructed in the target areas as part of an infill program.
City of Rancho Cucamon§a Pa§e2-29 i 9
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
2.4.7 Code Enforcement
The City maintains a comprehensive Property Maintenance Ordinance
that sets minimum standards to address the maintenance of private
property and prevent unsafe and unsightly conditions within the City. The
City's Code Enforcement program is reactive, based on citizen complaints.
According to Code Enforcement staff, residential properties that need
improvement or rehabilitation are generally scattered throughout the
community.
Code Enforcement is also addressed through the rehabilitation program.
At the time assistance is given, any violation will also be addressed. In
conjunction with inspecting and noticing propere/ owners regarding a
violation, City Code Enforcement staff generally advises property owners to
contact the City for information on the various rehabilitation programs
available.
,age 2-3o City of Rancho Cucamonga
Comrnuni~, Profile
2.5 Affordable Housing
The availability and location of public and assisted housing may be a fair
housing concern. If such housing is concentrated in one area of a
community, a household seeking affordable housing is limited .to choices
within that area. In addition, public/assisted housing and Section 8
assistance should be accessible to lower income households regardless of
race, ethnicity, or disability.
2.5.1 Section 8 Rental Assistance
The San Bernardino County Housing Authority ($BCHA) administers the
Section § Housing Assistance Payment Program for the City and maintains
several, small, scattered public housing units. The primary objective of
5BCHA is to provide affordable housing for extremely Iow income families
within San Bemardino County. The Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment ,
Program provides rental subsidies to Iow income (50 percent of the County '
MFI) households that spend more than 50 percent of their gross income on
housing costs. The Program pays the difference between the excess of 30
percent of the recipient's monthly income and the federally approved Fair
Market Rent (FMR).
Section 8 rental assistance is issued vouchers. The voucher
typically
as
system allows the voucher holder to choose housing that rents at levels
higher than the FMRs but up to the SBCHA-established payment standard.
The voucher holders must make up the difference between the FMR and
the actual rents. The intent of the voucher system is to provide greater
mobility and location choices for the recipients. However, the escalating
rents have made vouchers a not-so-attractive offer to most landlords. It
has become increasing difficult for many voucher holders to find places
where the vouchers may be accepted.
According SBCHA, 157 Section 8 recipients were residing in Rancho
Cucamonga. Of these, 78 were elderly households. Among all recipients,
the majority were White (33 percent) and Black (31 percent), with another
20 percent being Hispanic residents and 6 percent being Asian (Table 2-
17).
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-31
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice !
In comparision to the overall ethnic I
Table 2-17: Section 8 Voucher makeup of the City, Hispanic households
Holders by Race/Ethnicity are slighly underrepresented among
Number of Section 8 recipients and African American I
Race/Ethnicity Households Percent residents are overreprsented. Th'is may'
White 52 33% indicate that additonal outreach and I
Hispanic 30 19% education is necessary to increase
Black 48 31% participation among Hispanic residents.
Asian 9 6% AS of March 2002, over 15,000 applicants, !
Other 18 11% were on the Countywide Section 8 waiting
list. The 'average waiting period ranges I
Total 157 100% from three to five years, depending on
Source: San Bemardino Housing Authority, 2002. waiting list preferences identified below.
Preferences I
For the distribution of Section 8 assistance, the Housing Authority has I
established two preferences:
1) Residents who live and/or work in the County of San Bernardino; I
and
2) Households that contribute to meeting the income level goals !
established by the Housing Authority of San Bemardino
2.5.2 Public and Assisted Housing I
Apartment projects can receive assistance from a variety of sources to
ensure that rents are affordable to Iow- and moderate-income households. I
In exchange for public assistance, property owners are required to reserve
all or a portion of the units at affordable rents. The length of affordability I
control depends upon the funding program used. A number of apartment
complexes in Rancho Cucamonga have project-based rental assistance for
Iow-income households. Eleven senior and family affordable developments I
totaling over 2,527 apartment units are located in the City (Table 2-18).
Among the 2,527 units, 906 are set aside as housing affordable to lower
and moderate income households. However, 703 of these units may I
convert to market rate housing starting in 2005 as various affordability
covenants and agreements begin to expire. I
In addition, SBCHA currently operates 16 scattered public housing.units in
Rancho Cucamonga. Most of these units are single-family homes and !
Pa§e 2-32 City of Rancho Cucamonga / ~ .~ !
Community Profile
include two one-bedroom units, four two-bedroom units,' three three-
bedroom units, and seven four-bedroom units. Although the public
housing units are considered in good condition, due to the older age of the
units, lead based paint is a concern. SBCHA intends to pursue an
aggressive program to abate or manage all lead based paint hazards that
may exist. SBCHA does not anticipate the loss of any Of these iJnits in the
foreseeable future.
The assisted and public housing
projects are generally well spread out
(Figure 2-8). While five assisted
housing projects are located in Iow and
moderate-income areas, the majority
of assisted and public housing units are
located outside of these areas.
SoCal Housing in partnership with the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and the '
Redevelopment Agency and'
acquired
rehabilitated Rancho Verde Village. This
development combines over 100 quality
affordable one- and two-bedroom units
w/th rnarke~ rate housing.
Table 2-18: Assisted Housing
Project Name Type of Assistance Assisted Units Total Units Type
Alta Park Apartments Housing Review Bond 79 396 Family
Don Miguel 221 (D)(4) 40 200 Family
Evergreen Apartments Housing Review Bond 79 393 Family
Heritage Park Senior Housing Overlay 163 233 Senior
Mountain View Housing Review Bond 54 270 Family
Park~iew Apartments Housing Review Bond 30 152 Family
Pepperwood RDA Set Aside Funds 46 230 Family
Rancho Verde Village RDA Set Aside Funds 104 240 Family
Rudolph Hendrickson Senior Housing Overlay 168 1
68
Senior
Sycamore Terrance Housing Review Bond 26 128 Family
Woodhaven Manor CHFA Revenue Bonds 117 117 Family
Total Units 906 2,527
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-33
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
2.6 Licensed Community Care Facilities I
Persons with special needs such as the elderly and those with disabilities
must
also
have
access to ~housing in a community. Community care I
facilities provide a supportive housing environment to persons with,special .
needs in a group situation. Restrictions that prevent this type of facilities ·
from locating in a community impede the equal access to adequate
I
housing for the special needs groups.
According to the State of California Departm,ent of Social Services' I
Community Care Licensing Division, 19 licensed community care facilities
are located in Rancho Cucamonga (Table 2-19). The capacity of these
facilities ranges from as few as 2 to as many as 145 beds. The largest
·
proportion of beds (251) is for residential elderly care. Several facilities
accommodate persons with developmental disabilities. Care for non- I
. ambulatory persons is offered primarily at residential facilities for the
elderly. While the distribution of community care facilities tends to be II
concentrated in the eastern portion of the community, the majority are
located outside of Iow and moderate income areas (Figure 2-9).
·
Table 2-19: Licensed Communit, Care Facilities
Type of Disability
Develop- I
Facility Type Facilities Capacity mental Non-Ambulatory
Adult Day Care 2 90 90 2
Adult Residential 6 31 22 0
Group Home 2 10 0 0
·
Residential- Elderly 9 251 0 77 I
Small Family Home 2 10 4 0
Total 19 392 116 79
Source: State of California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensir , Division, 2001
I
I
I
I
Page 2-34 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
[]
ONT,4~IO
IJ~L AIRPORT
Source: 1990, 2000 U.S. Cerlsus
Legend Assisted Units
.... City Boundary ~ Family ~ Low Moderate
Census Tract Boundary (2000) Scattered Public Housing Income Areas (1990)
(Low and Moderate Income
-- Census Block Group Boundary (2000) O Senior Concentration isdefined as
any census blockgroup with
m Census Tract Number (2000) morethan 33.07~ low and
moderate income population)
HH,2'$00, $,000,17,500, , ~0,0001Feer, Mil~ ~---~ ~) ~) AffordableFigure 2-8
~/' 0 o.5 ~ ~.5 2 Housing Projects
city of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-35
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice !
Figure 2-8
Affordable Housing Projects I
(Back page)
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2-36 City of Rancho Cucamonga DO/ I
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
. , I_ l limn ///
-- 16~St '1 ~ ] B[sellne6d ~[ s - ~ BnsellneA~
legend Omnitrans Route Names
.... Ci~ Bounda~ ~ ~aff~-On~rio
Census Tra~ 8ounda~ (2~0) ~ Fonmna-On~rio-Pomona Communi~ ~re Facilities
-- CensusBl~kGmup~unda~(2~0) ~ ~ino-On~fio-Upiand ~ ~AulTOay~m
~ Census Tra~ Numar (2~0) ~ Fon~na-F~ill-Montclair ~ Adult R~idenfial
~ Low M~erate ~ ~n~na~haffey ~ R~idential Eldedy
In.me ~e~ (~990)
(L~ond~ml~ ~ IndZanaHill-Mon~ctair-Chaffey ~ CmupHome
~m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mon~l~ir-On~rio-Ran~o Cu~mon~ ~ Small Family
~ ~n ~.o~ a~ ~ Fon~na-Coun~llage-On~o
~ Montclair-On~rio-~n 8emardino
o 2,~ ~,~ ~,s~ ~o,~ Figure 2-9
H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~**t Transit Access to Communi~
lq ~ I I I i Mil~
~ o o.s ~ ~.s 2 · Care Facilities
Ci~ of Rancho Cu~monga Page 2-37
I
Anal)~sis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice !
Figure 2-9
Transit Access to Community Care Facilities I
(Back page)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2-38 City of Rancho Cucamon§a
I
I Communi~/Profile
2.7 ^ccessibili of Public Transit
!
Public transit plays an important role
I in analyzing access to housing. Public
transit should link lower income
persons, who are often transit
I dependent, to maior employers
where job opportunities may be
i available, lhe lack of an integral
relationship between public transit,
employment opportunities, and
I affordable housing may impede fair housing choice because persons who
depend on public transit will have limited choices regarding places to live.
I Further, and disabled are much transit-
many
elderly
persons
very
dependent. Specifically, many rely on public transit to visit doctors, go
i shoppin~ or attend activities offered at communi~/facilities. Housing for
the elderly and disabled should be located near transit routes, or
alternative transit should be made available for persons with special needs.
I This section discusses the accessibility of public transit to major employers,
shopping centers, community and medical facilities from lower income
areas and housing for persons with special needs.
I
2.7.1 Public Transit
I Public transportation in Rancho Cucamonga and surrounding communities
is provided by Omnitrans, the public transit agency that serves San
I Bernardino County. As shown on Figure 2-8, nine transit routes serve
Rancho Cucamonga (60, 61, 63, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, and 90) and link the
City with the surrounding communities of Fontana, Upland, and Ontario.
I ~ Route 60 serves the central and eastern Rancho Cucamonga. This
route provides a link to Chaffey College, Alta Loma High School, to the
I City of Ontario and Ontario International Airport.
I ~ Route 61 travels along the southern border of Rancho Cucamonga east
to west between the cities of Pomona, Montclair; Ontario, Rancho
Cucamonga and Ontario.
I ~- Route 63 travels north to south just outside the western boundary of
Rancho Cucamonga. Route 63 provides a link between San Antonio
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-39
i
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Community Hospital in Upland, Ontario Civic Center, Ontario High
School and Chino.
I:.] Route 66 travels east to west along the central portion of the
community, providing links betWeen the cities of Montclair, Upland,
Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Fontana. This bus route servii:es the
San Antonio Hospital in Upland, the Montclair transit center, the
Rancho San Antonio Medical Center, the Epicenter Stadium and the
community of Fontana.
~.~- Route 67 provides a direct link betWeen the ,South Fontana Transit
Center and Fontana and Chaffey Colle§e in Rancho Cucamonga. This
bus line travels through the central northeastern portion of the
community along Baseline road and Haven Avenue.
[] Route 68 passes through western Rancho Cucamonga traveling north
to south. This bus line provides a link betWeen Rancho Cucamonga,
Ontario and Montclair. This line provides service to Chaffey College,
Rancho Cucamonga Justice Center, and Kaiser Clinic.
:"- Route 70 travels between the cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario
and Montclair. This bus line provides service to the Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, the post office, the Ontario Mills Mall and
the Montclair Civic Center.
[] Route 71 provides service east to west near the southern border of
Rancho Cucamonga and to Montclair and Ontario. Route 71 offers
service e to the Montclair Transit Center, Montclair Plaza and the City
of Ontario.
:.'- Route 90 travels near the southern border of Rancho Cucamonga, east
to west. This bus line provides service to the cities of Montclair,
Ontario, and San Bernardino.
All Omnitrans buses are equipped with lifts/ramps to board wheel chairs,
scooters, orthopedic strollers or other mobility devices. Fairs are reduced
for senior and disabled individuals with identification. Omnitrans also
offers Access, a public transportation service for persons who are physically
or cognitively unable to use regular bus service. Access provides curb-to-
curb service to complement the Omnitrans fixed bus system. The Access
service area is defined at up to % of a mile on either side of an existing bus
Pa§e 2-40 City °f Ranch° Cucam°nga 90~/~
Community Profile
route. Service is available on the same day and times that routes in the
area are operating.
Other Transportation Services
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has teamed with the Rancho Cucamonga
Family YMCA to provide a free transportation program for Rancho
Cucamonga seniors. Each day a 15-passenger para-transit bus provides two
round trips to and from the Senior Center
A subsidized transportation service called Dial-A-Cab is also available for
senior and disabled residents using local taxis. Individuals pay $0.85 for
the first 2.5 miles of your trip. In order to use this service, persons must
have an Omnitrans Senior/Disability Card. .'
Current transportation services available to assist disabled persons in
Rancho Cucamonga include: the Riverside Transit Agency Special
Transportation service and Rancho Cucamonga Dial-a-Ride program,
which provides disabled and senior residents curb-to-curb transit access.
The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center also offers transportation
assistance. .
2.7.2 Community Facilities
Many lower income, elderly, and disabled persons depend on public
transit to reach community facilities, such as hospitals/clinics, community
centers, public libraries, and shopping centers. Figure 2-10 overlays transit
routes in the community with these community facilities. As shown, most
community including, libraries, community centers,
of
the
facilities
Hospitals, and police and fire stations identified are located along or within
walking distance from Omnitrans bus routes. In addition, the majority of
shopping centers within Rancho Cucamonga are also located within easy
access to public transit.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2-41
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
2.7.3 Major Employers
A number of large businesses,
institutions, and agencies that
provide both local and regional
employment opportunities are
located in Rancho Cucamonga.
Major employers in Rancho
Cucamonga include Frito-Lay Inc.
(below), Barrett Business Services, Built in 1970, the Rancho Cucamonga Fffto-Lay
Heritage Hospital, and Coca-Cola manufactuffng site is one of two reg/ona/
operation facilities in Southern california. With
Bottling Co, among others (Table 2- approximately 700 employees, the site is the
20). Most major employers in world's leading producer of convenient foods
Rancho Cucamonga are located including Doritos, Fritos, and Tortilla Chips.
the southern portion of the
along
community. Most of the employment centers are located along or near
transit routes. However, access to a number of businesses located along
Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue requires private transportation
(Figure 2-11).
Table 2-20: Major Employers
Number of
of Business Employees Location
Business
Type
Barrett Business Services Employment Agency 1800 8645 Haven Ave.
Penske Logistics Tracking Internet Development Consulting 700 11559 Jersey Blvd.
Frito-Lay Inc. Food Products 700 9535 Archibald Ave.
Mac Frugal's Bargain Close Variety Stores 600 12434 4~ St.
Out
RMP Merit Automobile Manufacturers 520 12250 4~ St.
Heritage Hospital Hospital 420 10841 White oak Ave,
B---radshaw International Furniture Dealers 350 9409 Buffalo Ave.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Bottlers 325 10670 6~h St.
Schlosser Forge Company Aircraft Component~ 300 11711 Arrow Rte.
Safetrans Systems Railroad Equipment 300 10655 7~ St.
Parts Automobile Parts 300 12250 4~' St.
RPM
Replacement
Source: Info USA 2001.
Pa§e 2-42 City of Rancho Cucamon§a
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
[]
Source: 1990, 2000 U.S. Census; Omnitrans
Legend Community Facilities
.... City Boundary [] Assistant League of Upland [] City Hall
Census Tract Boundary (2000) [] RC Family/Sports Center [] Winery
-- Census Block Group Boundary (2000) [] YMCA a Senior Center
I Census Tract Number (2000) [] Park/Community Center [] Shopping Centers
Transit [] Public Library [] Chaffey College
~ Omnitrans Route Names [] Hospital [] University of La Veme
[] Fire Station [] Airport
.~ 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 [] Police Station Figure 2-10
~ ~ ~ , , Feet Transit Accessibility to
~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~Miles Community Facilities
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice .... I
Figure 2-10
Transit Access to Community Facilities I
(Back page)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2-44 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST
!
I ,~St ~, ~ I RLeline,:d ~ I : / ~ / BaselineA~ I
J ~,
l, f ~ r ~ ~[~-- - ~ -
I /Mi ,ion ~i
j L~end Omnltrans Route Nam~
.... ~ Bounda~
Cents Tra~ Bounda~ (20~) ~ Chaffey-On~rio ~ills Employment Centers
~ Fon~na-On~rio-~mona
~ ~n~s BI~ G~p B~nda~ (2~0) ~ Chino-On.rio-Upland ~e
~ Cents Tra~ Numar (2~)
~ ~n~na-F~ill-~on~lair ~ ~ to 249
~ L~ ~erate
Income Are~ (1990) ~ Fon~na-Chaffey ~ 250 to 499
(L~ a~ ~e I~e ~ Indiana HilL~ontclair-Chaff~
~ ~n 33.0~ a~ O 1 ~ to 4999
~ ~ ~, Figure 2-11
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~il~ Transit Access to
~ 0 0.~ ~ ~.s ~ Major Employe~
Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Anal?sis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
I
Figure 2-11
Transit Access to Major Employers I
(Back page)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2-46 City of Rancho Cucamonga
&// I
I
I
I
I
I
I Chapter 3
I Mortgage Lending Practices
I
A key aspect of fair housing choice is
j equal access to financing for the purchase ~
or improvement of a home. This chapter
reviews the lending practices of financial
institutions and the access minorities and
all income groups have to home loans.
I
3.1 Background
I'
In the past, financial institutions did not always employ fair lending
practices. Credit market distortions and other activities such as redlining~
prevented some groups from equal access to credit. The passage of the
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in 1977 was designed to improve
access to credit for all members of the community.
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) is intended to encourage
regulated financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of entire
communities, including Iow and moderate income neighborhoods.
Depending on the type of institution and total assets, a lender may be
examined by different supervising agencies for its CRA performance.
The word #redlinin~ refers to the practice whereby a lender provides unequal access to credit or
unequal credit terms to a person because of their race, creed, color or national odgin or other
characteristic(s) of the residents of the area in which the applicant resides or will reside.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3-1
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
In tandem with the CRA, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act' (HMD^)
requires lending institutions to make annual public disclosures of their
home mortgage lending activity. Under HMDA, lenders are required to
disclose information on the disposition of home loan applications and on
the race or national origin, gender, and annual income of loan applicants.
Detailed 2000 HMDA data for conventional and government-backed
home purchase and home improvement loans in Rancho Cucamonga
were examined. HMDA data provides some insights regarding the lending
patterns that exist in a community. However, the HMDA data is only an
indicator of potential problems; it cannot be used to conclude definite
redlining or discrimination.
3.2 Conventional Home Loans
3.2.1 Conventional Home Purchase Loans
Race of Applicants
As discussed in Chapter 2 of this report, homeownership is typically
affordable to households with higher incomes. Reflective of the household
income characteristics in Rancho Cucamonga, proportionally more White
households are homeowners (see Table 2-7). In 2000, Whites comprised
the majority (47 percent) of applicants for conventional home loans in the
City. Hispanics trailed as a distant second largest ethnic group at 16
percent, followed by Asians (7 percent) and Blacks applicants (6 percent).
In comparison to the overall ethnic and racial composition of the City,
Hispanic households are underrepresented in the ownership housing
market.
When compared to countywide levels, conventional home mortgage loan
applications in Rancho Cucamonga had slightly higher rates of approval.
Approximately 69 percent of all conventional home mortgage applications
were approved in the City, compared to 66 percent in San Bemardino
County. Correspondingly, the denial rate in Rancho Cucamonga was 16
percent, compared to the 20 percent County denial rate.
Approval and denial rates within Rancho Cucamonga varied among
different racial/ethnic groups. Native Americans, who represent less than 1
percent of the City population, had the highest approval rate with 86
Page 3-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mortgage Lending Practices
per~enL White applicants followed with a modest approval rate at 75
_ per_cent, while Black, Hispanic, and Asian applicants had lower loan
approval rates (62 percent, 65 percent, and 66 percent, respectively).
Conversely, the denial rates for both Hispanic (20 percent) and Black (22
percent) applicants were higher than'that for other racial/ethnic groups in
Rancho Cucamonga by at least 5 percentage points.
Table 3-1: Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications by
Race of Applicant
Withdrawn or
Total Approved Denied Closed
% of % of % of % of
Race # Total # Total # Total # Total
Native American 22 0% 19 86% 2 9% I 5%
Asian 401 7% 264 66% 59 15% 78 19%
Black 335 6% 207 62% 73 22% 55 16%
Hispanic, 906 16% 586 65% 177 20% 143 16%
White 2,600 47% 1,937 75% 354 14% 309 12%
Joint 259 5% 193 75% 32 12% 34 13%
Other 114 2% 82 '72% 13 11% 19 17%
Not Available 927 17% 564 61% 193 21% 170 18%
Total 5,564 100% 3,852 69% 903 16% 809 15%
joint applications can be of different radal/ethnic backgrounds; however, HMDA data doe~
not provide a means of identifying the racial/ethnic backgrounds of joint applicants.
Source: HMDA data tabulated~using Peertrax software by the Centrax Group, 2000.
Income of Applicants
Generally, applicant income and credit history are the primary factors in
determining conventional loan approvals. In Rancho Cucamonga, the
largest proportion (4,036) all applications came from households with an
income of greater than 120 percent of MFI. An inverse relationship
typically existed between denial rates and the income of applicants, with
the denial rate lowest for households with an income of greater than 120
percent of MFI and highest for households with an income of less than 50
percent of MFI (Table 3-2).
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
'[able 3-2: Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications by
Income of Applicant
Withdrawn or
Applicant Total Approved Denied Closed
Income % of % of % of % of
(% of MFI) # Total # Total # Total # Total
,:50% 68 1% 38 56% 22 32% 8 12%
50% to <80% 313 6% 197 63% 81 26% 35 11%
80% to <100% 428 8% 274 64% 102 24% 52 12%
100% to <120% 527 9% 335 64% 106 20% 86 16%
>=120% 4,036 73% 2896 72% 568 14% .572 14%
Not Available 192 4% 112 58% 24 13% 56 29%
Total 5,564 100% 3852 69% 903 16% 809 15%
Source: HMDA data tabulated using Peert~ax software by the Centrax Group, 2000.
3.2.2 Conventional Home Improvement Loans
Race of Applicants
In 2000, 1,316 households applied for conventional loans from private
lending institutions .for home repairs and improvements (see Table 3-3).
The largest racial/ethnic group was White applicants (31 percent),
reflective of the homeownership pattern in the City. Only 11 percent
were Hispanic, and other races each accounted for less than 3 percent. At
35 percent, the overall level of home improvement loan denials was much
higher than that for conventional home purchase loans (20 percent).2 Due
to the relatively small number of applications from Native American, Asian,
and Black residents, an accurate level of approvals and denials is difficult
to determine. Moreover, racial data was unavailable for nearly half of all
home improvement applications. Accounting for 31 percent of the loan
applications, White applicants had an approval rate of 65 percent.
Hispanic applicants had a lower approval rate (56 percent) than White
applicants. Blacks and Asians who represented the same proportion of
applicants (2 percent) had significantly different approval ratings, with the
Asian applicant approval rate of 68 percent compared to the approval rate
of Blacks at 47 percent.
Many homeowners, who already have mortgage loans, may find it hard to qualify for home
improvement loans due to the high debt-to-income ratio.
Page 3-4 City °f Ranch° Cucam°nga C~/~
Mortgage Lending Practices
Table 3-3: Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications
by Race of Applicant
Withdrawn or
Total Approved Denied Closed
% of % of % of % of
Race # Total # Total # Total # Total
Native American 4 0% I 25% 3 75% 0 0%
Asian 28 2% 19 68% 8 29% I 4%
Black 30 2% 14 47% 15 50% 1 3%
Hispanic 151 12% 84 56% 58 38% 9 6%
415 32% 268 65% 123 30% 24 6%
White
Joint 50 4% 36 72% -14 28% 0 0%
Other 11 1% 8 73% 3 27% 0 0%
Not Available 627 48% 345 55% 238 38% 44 7%
Total 1,316 100% 775 49% 462 35% 79 6%
Note: Applicants who filed joint applications can be of different racial/ethnic bad, zounds; however, HMDA data does
not provide a means of identifying the racial/ethnic backgrounds of joint applicants.
Source: HMDA data tabulated using Peertrax software by the Centrax Group, 2000.
Income of Applicants
Similar to home purchase financing, home improvement loan applications
were fi~ed primarily by households earning over 120 percent of the Coun~
MFI. Approximately 70 percent of these applications were filed by upper-
income households (>120 percent MI:l), while only 6 percent were from
lower-income households (<g0 percent MFI). Several reasons may
explain this phenomenon. Lower income homeowners would most likely
incur too high an income-to-debt ratio with the mortgage loan to qualify
for additional financing. Also, home improvement may not be a priori~
as other items such as food, clothing, and
for
Iow-income
households
other bills.
City of Rancho Cucamon§a Pa§e 3-5
,~nalysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Table 3-4: Disposition of Conventional Home Improvement Loan Applications by
Income of Applicant: 2000 '
~ Withdrawn or
Applicant Total Approved Denied CIose~,
Income % of % of % of % of
(% of MFI) # Total # Total # Total # Total
<50% 20 2% 8 40% 9 45% 3 15%
50% to <80% 80 6% 34, 43% 43 54% 3 4%
130% to <100% 84 6% 41 49% 42 .50% I 1%
100%to <120% 152 12% 77 51% ' 66 43% 9 6%
1
20%
91
7
70% 603 66% 260 28% 54 6%
Not Available 63 5% 12 19% 42 67% 9 14%
Total 1,316 100% 775 59% 462 35% 79 6%
Source: HMDA data tabulated usin Peertrax software by ~e Centzax Group, 2000.
3.2.3 Conventional Financing by Lender
In 2000, the top ten mortgage lenders received over 44 percent of the
conventional home mortgage loan applications in Rancho Cucamonga.
Among these top lenders, North American had the highest approval rate
(89%), followed closely by Wells Fargo (85 percent), Washington Mutual
and Greenpoint (each with 80 percent). Two major lenders exhibited very
Iow denial rates: Kaufman and Broad (1 percent), and North American (5
percent). Of particular note, almost half (46 percent) of applications to
Kaufman and Broad were withdrawn or closed. In contrast, only one
percent of the applications were withdrawn or closed for Greenpoint.
Based on a search in the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
databases, none of the major lenders active in Rancho Cucamonga
received a CRA rating of "Needs to Improve" or "Substantial
Noncompliance."
Page 3-6 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mortgage Lending Practices
Table 3-5: Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications by
Lending Institution
Withdrawn or
Total Approved Denied C!osed
~ithdr'l,
Market Approval Denial Closed
Lender # Share # Rate # Rate # Rate
World Savings Bank 529 9.5% 369 70% 54 10% 109 21%
First Franklin Financial 421 7.5% 248 59% 79 19% 94 22%
Countrywide 270 4.8% 208 77% 20 7% 42 16%
Kaufman & Broad 260 4.6% 139 53% 2 1% I 119 46%
Washington Mutual 205 3.6% 164 80% -21 10% 20 10%
iNorth American 203 3.6% 180 89% 10 5% 13 6%
Wells Fargo 194 3.4% 165 85% 17 9% 12 6%
Greenpoint Mortgage 157 2.8% 126 80% 29 18% 2 1%
Bank of America 133 2.3% 93 70% 28 21% 12 9%
Chase Manhattan 127 2.2% 87 69% 36 28% 4 3%
5,564 100% 3,852 69% 903 16% 809 15%
Total
Market
Source: HMDA data tabulated using Peerh'ax soft, rare by the Centrax Group, 2000.
Homebuyer Assistance Programs
A common obstacle for first-time homebuyers in achieving
homeownership is not having enough savings to make a down payment.
Among the top four lenders - World Savings Bank, First Franklin,
Countrywide, and Kaufman and Broad - three offer special mortgage
programs that allow first-time homebuyers to contribute three percent or
less for down payment.
First Franklin offers a zero-down payment program for homebuyers with
high credit scores. The maximum loan amount is up to $500,000 for this
program and a maximum debt ratio of 50 percent is allowed for first-time
homebuyers.
Countrywide also offers a variety of down payment assistance programs,
including the "House America 95 Percent LTV Program." This program
provides Iow and moderate-income with loan
buyers
a
mortgage
op~on
with 5 percent down payment, more flexible debt ratios and terms ranging
from 15 to 30 years.
(:lb/of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3-7
,~alysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Although World Savings Bank does not have a program specifically
targeted to first-time homebuyers; the company offers a number of flexible
financing, Iow-interest and Iow or zero downpayment options for
homebuyers. The "100 Percent Home Loan# program allows households
that have enough income to afford a home loan but have not saved up for
a downpayment to finance the entire home purchase. Under this loan
program, World Savings Bank will lend the entire purchase price with no
downpayment required. Instead, the program requires collateral for 10
percent of the home purchase price from a third party such as a family.
member.
Kaufman & Broad is somewhat unique, because they build and finance the
buyer's house. They have Homebuyers Club iri San Bemardino/Riverside
County (and others as well) that consults with and provides free credit
repores to potential buyers. As brokers they offer various types of loans,
with CHF^ as a specific First-time Buyer program.
3.3 Government-Backed Home Loans
3.3.1 Home Purchase Loans
Government-backed financing represents an alternative to conventional
financing. Sources of government-backed financing include the Federal
Housing Administration (FHA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA),
and the Rural Housing Services/Farm Service Agency (RHS/FSA).
Government-backed home mortgage loans had higher approval and lower
denial rates, compared to conventional loans. However, conventional
loans comprised the majority (78 percent) of all applications, with
government-backed loan applications making up the remaining 22 percent
(Table 3-6).
Pag~ 3-8 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
I Mortgage Lending Practices
I Table 3-6: Comparison of Conventional and Government-Backed
Home Purchase Loan Applications
I Conventional Government-Backed
# of % of # of % of
I Disposition Applications Total Applications Total
Loans Approved 3,852 69% 1,250 80%
Denied 903
I Closed, Withdrawn 809 15% 194 12,%
Total 5,564 100% 1,567 100%
I Source: HMDA data tabulated using Peertrax software by the Centrax Group, 2000.
3.3.2 Home Improvement Loans
I As was the case for home purchase loans, homeowners in Rancho
Cucamonga relied more heavily on conventional rather than government-
I backed sources of financing for homeimprovement loans. Approximately
92 percent of all home improvement loan applications were for
i conventional loans, compared to 8 percent for government-backed loans
(Table 3-7). In contrast to home purchase applications, conventional
home improvement loans had significantly higher approval rates and
I correspondingly lower denial rates than government-backed loans.
i Table 3-7: Comparison of Conventional and Government-Backed
Home Improvement Loan Applications
Conventional Government-Backed
I # of % of # of % of
Disposition Applications Total Applications Total
Loans Approved 775 59% 41 38%
I Denied 309 35% 62 57%
Closed, Withdrawn 79 6% 5
I Total 1,316 100% 108 100%
Source: HMOA data tabulated usin Peertrax software by the Ceqtrax Group, 2000.
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3-9
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
3.4 Lending by Census Tract
To identify potential geographic differences in mortgage lending activities,
an analysis of the HMDA data was conducted by census tract. Based on
estimates of tract median income, HMDA data categorizes the, census.
tracts into the following income level:
[] Low Income - <50 percent of County MFI
-"; Moderate Income - 50-80 percent of County MFI
[] Middle Income - 80-120 percent of County MF.I
[] Upper Income - >120 percent of County MFI
The most current HMDA data available is for_2000 based on the 1990
census tract boundaries (refer to Figure 2-5 for 1990 census tract
boundaries). No census tract in Rancho Cucamonga was classified as Iow-
income tract by HMDA in 2000.
The majority applications for conventional home purchase loans in Rancho
Cucamonga originated from upper income census tracts, which accounted
for 73 percent of all applications. This analysis further reveals that Census
Tract 20.01 accounted for nearly half (49 percent) of all applications for
conventional home purchase loans in 2000. A total of 2,718 applications
for conventional home purchase loans were recorded for Tract 20.01, 61
percent of these applications were approved and 15 percent were denied.
Of the four middle-income tracts in the City, three tracts - 22.02, 13.02,
and 21.00 had comparatively fewer applications and significantly lower
loan approval rates. In particular, Census Tract 22.02, which makes up
only 3 percent of all applications, had the highest denial rate (40 percent)
and lowest approval rate (42 percent). While this area is not considered to
be in the Iow and moderate income area, concentrations of Hispanic and
Black populations are found in this tract, as is Tract 13.02.
Combined, tracts with more than 50 percent minority populations
accounted for only 9 percent of all home purchase loan applications, while
tracts with 20 to 50 percent minority population accounted for 91 percent
of the applications. The average denial rate (30 percent) in areas of high
minority concentration was double that in areas of lower minority
concentration (15 percent).
Page 3-10 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
I Mortgage Lending Practices
I Table 3-8: Comparison of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications by
Census Tract
I Total Approved Denied
% % of % of % of~
Tract Minority Income Number Total Number Total Number Total
I 8.12 20-50% Upper 113 2% 61 54% 24 21%
13.02 50-80% Middle 291 5% 161 55% 69 24%
I 20.01 '20-50%. Upper 2,718 49% 1,665 61% 414
15%
20.02 20-50% Upper 312 6% 219 70% 34 11%
i 20.03 20-50% Upper 301 5% 213 71% 38 13%
20.04 20-50% Upper 136 2% 92 68% 17 13%
20.05 20-50% Upper 458 8% 298 65% 70 15%
I 20.06 20-50% Middle 551 10% 340 62% 56 10%
21.00 20-50% Middle 500 9% 274 55% 108 22%
I 22.02 50-80% Middle 184 3% 77 42% 73 40%
Total 5,564 100% 3,400 61% 903 16%
Note: the census tzacts used for this analysis are based on the 1990 Census.
I
I Predatory Lending and Housing Fraud
The inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, along with many others in
I the industry have begun to raise concerns regarding predatory lending by
financial institutions and housing fraud by Realtors.
I 3.5.1 Predatory Lending
I Predatory lending involves abusive loan
practices
usually
targeting
minority
homeowners or those with less-than-perfect credit histories. These
i predatory practices include high fees, hidden costs, unnecessary insurance
requirements, and larger repayments due in later years. One of the most
common predatory practices is placing borrowers into higher interest rate
I loans than called for by their credit status. Although the borrowers may be
eligible for a loan in the "prime~ market, they are directed into more
expensive and higher fee loans in the "subprime~ market.
I Predatory lending is a growing fair housing issue. Predatory lenders who
i discriminate get some scrutiny under the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which
'City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3-11
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice ~ '
requires equal treatment in terms and conditions of housing opportunities
regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, family status,
and
credit
or disability. This applies to loan originators as well as the.secondary
market. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1972 requires equal
treatment in 10an terms and availability of credit for all of the above
categories, as well as age, sex, and marital status. Lenders that are
engaging in predatory lending would be in violation of these acts, if they
target Black, Hispanic or elderly households to buy higher priced and
unequal loan products; treat loans for protected classes differently than
those of comparably credit-worthy Whites; or have policies or practices.
that have a disproportionate effect on the protected classes. Examples of
fair lending violations include giving a Black borrower a higher-cost loan
than a White borrower with a comparable credit rating, or buying such a
loan in the secondary market.
3.5.2 Housing Fraud
·
In 2000, HUD began an initiative to address fraud in programs
administered by the federal agency, lhe "Housing Fraud Initiative"
investigation involved the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal
Revenue Service and U.S. Attorney's Office, and uncovered over $110
million in fraud involving three types of schemes:
[] Originating fraudulent ~oans that allowed unqualified borrowers to
obtain mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration;
[] A scam in which real estate professionals obtain mortgages in the
names of fictitious borrowers; and
[] Equity skimming, in which an owner sells a property to a so-called
"straw buyer~ at an inflated price. The straw buyer then defaults, but
the seller has already profited.
An example of equity skimming is when a person buys a $100,000 HUD
foreclosed home and resells it for $200,000 to a buyer who does not exist,
but is made "real" through false or forged documents. This person makes
a $100,000 profit from the fraudulent loan, money that should have been
awarded to deserving HUD applicants.
HUD targeted Southern California first under the program, to a large
extent, because the default rate in the seven Southern California counties
Page 3-12 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Mortgage Lending Practices'
I
is 50 percent higher than the national rate. In particular, the Inland
I Empire, consisting of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, is known to
have. the highest concentration of FHA foreclosures. A search on
I foreclosure data indicated that the City.of Rancho Cucamonga had few
incidences of bank or HUD foreclosures.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3-13
I
i
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
I
I
I
I
I
This page is intentionally blank. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pa§e 3-14 Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga
Chapter 4
Current Fair Housing Profile
This chapter provides an overview of the institutional structure of the
housing industry in governing fair housing practices of its members. Fair
housing services available to Rancho Cucamonga residents and recent fair
housing complaints, violations, and suits to determine trends in the City
are also assessed.
4.1 Fair Housing Practices in the Ownership
Housing Market
4.1.1 Homeownership Process
One of the main challenges in owning a home versus renting a home is the
process. Buying a house takes considerably more time and effort than
finding a home to rent. The major legal and financial implications
surrounding the process also' intimidate potential buyers. Typically, people
are overwhelmed by the unique terminology, number of steps required,
and financial considerations involved. The process is costly and fair
housing issues may surface at anytime during this process.
Advertising
The first thing a potential buyer is likely to do when they consider buying
a home is search advertisements either in magazines, newspapers, or the
Internet to get a feel for what the market offers. Language in advertising
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-1
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
-
has recently become an issue within the maim of real estate.
Advertisements
cannot
include
discriminatory references such as the use of
words describing:
~ Current or potential residents
· "] Neighbors or the neighborhood in racial or ethnic terms
~'~ Adults preferred
· J Perfect for empty nesters
~'] Conveniently located by a Catholic Church
· '-; Ideal for married couples without kids
Even the use of models in ads has been questioned, based on the idea that
it appears to appeal to a certain race. Additionally, selecting media or
locations for advertising that deny information on listings to certain
segments of the housing market may also be considered discriminatory.
Even if an agent does not intend to discriminate in an ad, it would still be
considered a violation to suggest to a reader whether or not a protected
class is preferred. Recent litigation has also set precedence for violations in
advertisements that hold publishers, newspapers, Multiple Listing Services,
real estate agents, and brokers accountable for discriminatory ads. ,M a
reminder
tO
choose
words
carefully, the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) now
prompts a fair housing message when a new listing is being added.
Lending
Initially, buyers must find a lender that will qualify them for a loan. This
part of the process entails an application, credit check, ability to repay,
amount eligible for, choosing the type and terms of the loan, etc.
Applicants are requested to provide a lot of sensitive information including
their gender, ethnicity, income level, age, and familial status. Most of this
information is used for reporting purposes required of lenders by the
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act (HMDA); however it does not guarantee that individual loan officers or
underwriters will not misuse the information.
A report on mortgage lending discrimination by the Urban Land Institute
illustrates four basic stages in which discrimination can occur -
advertising/outreach, pre-application inquiries, loan approval/denial and
terms/ conditions, and loan administration. A number of different
individuals take part in the various stages of this process and any of them
may potentially discriminate.
Page 4-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Current Fair Housing Profile
Real Estate Agents
Finding a realtor is normally the next step, which can be done by looking
in newspapers, searching the Internet, and primarily through referrals. The
agent will find the home that fits their needs, desires and budget based on
the amount they are qualified for by the lending institution.
Realtors may act as agents of discrimination. Some unintentionally or
possibly intentionally may steer the potentially buyer to particular
neighborhoods by encouraging the buyer to look into certain areas; others
may simply choose to show the buyer all choices available.
However, the California Association of Realtors (CAR) has included
language on many of their forms 'disclosing fair housing laws to those
involved. Many Realtor Associations also host Fair
Housing
trainings/'
seminars to educate their members on the provisions and liabilities of Fair
Housing Law. The Equal Opportunity Housing Symbol is also located on
all forms reminder.
as
a
Sellers
A seller may not want to sell his/her house to certain purchasers or may
want to accept offers only from a preferred group. The Residential Listing
Agreement and Seller's Advisory forms that seller's must sign to disclose
their understanding of Fair Housing Law and practice of
nondiscrimination.
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs)
In the past, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) were used to
exclude certain groups such as minorities from equal access to housing in a
community. Today, the California Department of Real Estate reviews
CC&Rs for all subdivisions of five or more lots, or condominiums of five or
more units. This review is authorized by the Subdivided Lands Act and
mandated by the Business Professions Code, Section 11000. The review
includes a wide range of issues, including compliance with fair housing
The review must be completed and approved before the Department of
Real [state will issue a final subdivision public report, lhis report is
required before a real estate broker can sell the units, and each
prospective buyer must be issued a copy of the report. If the CC&Rs are
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-3
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
not approved, the Department of Real Estate will issue a "deficiency
notice", requiring the real estate broker to revise the CC&Rs. I
Communities with old subdivisions or condominium developments may ·
still contain CC&R that do not comply with the fair housing law. However,
provisions in the CC&R that violate the fair housing law a're not'
enforceable. I
Insurance
I
Insurance agents are provided with underwriting guidelines for the
companies they work for to determine whether or not a company will sell ·
insurance to a particular applicant. Currently, underwriting guidelines are
not public information; however, consumers have begun to .seek access to
these underwriting guidelines in order to learn if certain companies have
discriminatory policies. Some states are being more responsive than others
to this demand and have recently begun to require companies file their
underwriting guidelines with the state department of insurance, which
would then make the information public. Texas is one state that has
mandated this reporting and its office has made some significant findings
regarding discriminatory insurance underwriting guidelines. I
Many insurance companies have applied strict guidelines, such as not ·
insuring older homes that disproportionately affects lower income and
minority families that can only afford to buy in older neighborhoods. The
California Department of Insurance (CDI) survey found that less than one
percent of the homeowners insurance available in California is currently
offered free from tight restrictions. CDI has also found that.many urban
areas are underserved by insurance agencies. I
The California Organized Investment Network (COIN) is a collaboration of
the California Department of Insurance, the insurance industry, I
community economic development organizations, and community
advocates. This collaboration was formed in 1996 at the request of the II
insurance industry as an alternative to state legislation that would have
required insurance companies to invest in underserved communities,
similar to the federal Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that applies to
the banking industry. COIN is a voluntary program that facilitates
insurance industry investments, which provide profitable returns to
investors
and
economic/social benefits to underserved communities. I
I
Page 4-4 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Current Fair Housing Profile
The California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan was
I by Legislature in 1968 and riots of the
created
the
after
the
brush
fires
1960's made it difficult for some people to purchase fire insurance due to
i hazards beyond their control. The FAIR Plan is designed to make property
insurance more readily available to people who have difficulty obtaining it
from private insurers because their property is considered "high risk."
I 4.1.2 National Association of Realtors
I On December 6, 1996, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and the National Association of Realtors (NAR)
i entered into a Fair Housing Partnership. The partnership requires HUD
and NAR to develop a Model Affirmative Fair Housing Action Plan for use
· by members of NAR to satisfy HUD's Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing
I regulationS,
The NAR has developed a Fair Housing Program to provide resources and
I guidance to Realtors in services for all
ensuring
equal
professional
people.
The term "Realtor~ identifies a licensed professional in real estate who is a
i member of the NAR. Not all licensed real estate brokers and salespersons
are members of the NAR. However, for those Realtors who are members
of NAR, they must pledge to conduct business in keeping with the spirit
I and letter of the Code of Ethics. Specifically, Article 10 of the Code of
Ethics obligates Realtors to affirmatively further fair housing as follows:
I Realtors shall not deny equal professional services to any
person for reasons of race, color, religion, sex, handicap,
familial status, or national origin. Realtors shall not be parties
I any plan or agreement against a person or
tO
tO
discriminate
persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap,
i familial status, or national origin. (Amended 1/90)
Realtors, in their real estate employment practices, shall not
I discriminate against any person or persons on the basis of
race, co/or, religion, sex, handicap, familia/status, or national
origin. (Amended 1/00)
I Article 10 is a firm statement of support for equal opportunity in housing.
In accordance with Article 10, Code of Ethics, each Realtor is required to
I sign the following pledge per the H U D-NAR agreement.
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-5
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
I agree to:
[] Provide equal professional service without regard to race, color, religion,
sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of any prospective
client, customer, or of the residents of any community.
[] Keep informed about fair housing law and practices, improving my ~
clients' and customers' opportunities and my business.I,
~,¢, Develop advertising that indicates that everyone is welcome and no one.
is excluded, expanding my client's and customer's opportunities to see,
buy, or lease property.
[] Inform my clients and customers about their rights and .responsibilities
under the fair housing laws by providing brochures and other
information.
[] Document my efforts to provide professional service, which will assist
me in becoming a more responsive and successful Realtor.
[] Refuse to tolerate non-compliance.
[] Learn about those who are different from me, and celebrate those
differences.
[] Take a positive approach to fair housing practices and aspire to follow
the spirit as well as the letter of the law.
[] Develop and implement fair housing practices for my firm to carry out
the spirit of this declaration.
Diversity Certification
The NAR has created a diversity certification,
"At Home with Diversity: One America" to be
granted to licensed real estate professionals who
meet eligibility requirements and complete the
NAR "At Home with Diversity" course. The
certification will signal to customers that the real
estate professional has been trained on working with diversity in today's
real estate markets. The coursework provides valuable business planning
tools to assist real estate professionals in reaching out and marketing to a
Page 4..6 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
I Current Fair Housing Profile
diverse housing market.. The NAR course focuses on diversity awareness,
I cross-cultural skills, and developing a business diversity In
building
plan.
July 1,999, the NAR Diversity Program received the HUD "Best Practices"
i award.
4.! .3 California Association of Realtors (CAR)
I CAR has recently created the position, Equal Opportunity/Cultural
Diversity Coordinator. In addition, the CAR conducted a survey of Realtors
I regarding cultural diversity issues and concems. CAR has three meetings
per year, and these meetings include sessions on fair housing issues.
i. Current outreach efforts in the Southern California area are directed to
underserved communities and state-licensed brokers and sales persons
who are not members of the CAR.
I Inland Valleys Association of Realtors (IVAR)
I The Inland Valleys Association of Realtors
_ A
serves Realtors in Rancho Cucamonga as .~,,~ ~
part of San Bemardino County, which
I includes 19 other cities. The Association
has over 3,300 members.
I The Association provides continuing education to members including
courses on the topics of ethics, trust funds, fair housing, and real estate
I. agency. Realtors with fair housing questions, or who are in need of
additional information, are usually referred to the California Association of
Realtors. Potential violations of fair housing law are referred to Inland Fair
I and Mediation Board. The Inland Association of Realtors
Housing
Valleys
also provides resource information and a multiple listing service.
I 4.1.4 California Department of Real Estate (DRE)
I The California Department of Real Estate (DRE) is the licensing authority
for real estate brokers and salespersons. As noted earlier, not all licensed
brokers and salespersons are members of the National or California
J Association of Realtors.
DRE has adopted education requirements that include courses in ethics
and in fair housing. In order to renew a real estate license, each licensee is
required to complete 45 hours of continuing education courses, including
three hours in each of the four mandated areas: agency, ethics, trust fund,
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-7
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
and fair'housing. The fair housing course contains information that will
enable an agent to identify and a~oid any discriminatory practices when
providing real estate services to clients.
4.2 Fair Housing Practices in the Rental
Housing Market'
4.2.1 lheApartment Rental'Process
While the process of renting an apartment may be less expensive and
burdensome up front than the homebuying process, it may still be just as.
time consuming and potential renters may face discrimination during
various stages of the rental process.
Advertising
Like finding a home to purchase, the main sources of information are the
classified advertisements in local newspapers, word of mouth, signs,
apartment guides, the Internet, and apartment brokers. The same types of
discriminatory language previously described under the Homeownership
Process (Section 5.1.1) may be used by landlords or apartment managers
to exclude "undesirable elements."
Viewing the Unit
Viewing the unit is the most obvious place where the potential renters may
encounter discrimination because landlords or managers may discriminate
based on race or disability, or judge on appearance whether a potential
renter is reliable or may violate any of the rules. For example, if a student
is wearing a T-shirt with a heavy metal band on the front design, a landlord
may be suspect of the potential for loud music to be played.
Credit Check
Landlords may ask the potential renters to provide credit references, lists of
previous addresses and landlords, and employment history/salary. The
criteria for tenant selection, if any, are typically not known to those seeking
to rent. Many landlords often use credit history as an excuse when trying
to exclude certain groups.
Page 4-8 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Current Fair Housing Profile
The Lease
I
Most apartments are rented under either a lease agreement or a month-to-
I month rental agreement. A lease is good from a tenant's point of view for
two reasons: the tenant is assured the right to live there for a specific
period of time and the tenant has an established rent during that period.
I Most other provisions of a lease protect the landlord. Information a lease
or rental agreement includes the rental rate, required deposit, length of
i occupancy, apartment rules, and termination requirements.
In a tight housing market where the landlord can financially afford to
i choose tenants tends to offer shorter lease terms. In this case, a landlord
may simply ask the "not-so-desirable" tenant to leave with a 30-day Notice
to Vacate. Shorter lease terms also allow the landlord to raise rent more
I frequently.
Typically, the lease or rental agreement is standard for all units within the
I same building. However, the enforcement of the rules contained in the
lease or agreement may not be standard for all tenants. A landlord may
choose strict enforcement of the rules for certain tenants based on arbitrary
I factors, such as race, presence of c. hildren, or disability. Since the recent
escalation of housing prices throughout California, complaints regarding
i tenant harassment through strict enforcement of lease agreements as a
means of evicting tenants have increased.
I, Initial Payment and Security Deposit
An initial payment consisting of first and last months' rent, as well as a
I security deposit are typically required.
To
deter
"less-than-desirable"
tenants, a landlord may ask for an initial payment or security deposit
i higher than for others. Tenants may also face differential treatment when
vacating the units. The landlord may choose to return a smaller portion of
the security deposit to some tenants, claiming excessive wear and tear.
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamon§a Pa§e 4-9
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
4.2.2 Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire
(AAGIE)
Located in Upland, the Apartment A~sociation of the Greater Inland
Empire serves the area east of the 605 Freeway including the East San
Gabriel Valley, San Bemardino County, Riverside County and the
Coachella Valley. The Association has over 800 members and publishes a
monthly newsletter AGGIE that provides information to apartment owners
and managers. The Association provides a number of services including
forms, referrals to vendors, educational courses and workshops including
the Certificate in Residential Management (CRM) course, and special
Lunch Club thalf provides information on a variety of topics including fair
housing. Free legal services are also provided to members and new'
members receive an information packet regarding landlord responsibilities
and other information related to apartment ownership and management
including fair housing.
The Certificate in Residential Management (CRM) Course is an educational
series of classes designed by the California Apartment Association and
offered throughout the year by AAGIE. The classes provide apartment
owners, managers, and other interested individuals with information on a
variety of topics, including fair housing and ethics. The Certificate in
Residential Management course topics include:
r.] Introduction to Property Management
l~J Intermediate Property Management
[] Ethics in the Rental Housing Industry
-~'] The Essentials of Fair Housing
~r] Liability Issues Related to Maintenance
[] Drug and Crime-Free Housing
:'~- Navigating the Legal Maze
['~ Ending the Tenancy: What You Need to Know
[] Money Management in Rental Housing
For fair housing questions or concerns, AGGIE provides information over
the phone as well as referrals, if necessary. The Executive Director, who
has over ten years of experience, handles most fair housing questions from
apartment owners, managers and landlords. For more complex issues, the
Association refers its members to the local fair housing agency or to an
attorney.
~a§e 4-10 Clty of Rancho Cucamon§a
I
Current Fair Housing Profile
I
4.2.3 San Bernardino County Housing Authority
I The San Bernardino County Housing Authority
oversees the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program and
I manages public housing units in Rancho Cucamonga ~'..~
and surrounding cities. Section 8 recipients receive a
I briefing packet that nc udes information about fair
housing issues, including how to file a complaint. The
Housing Authority has forms that can be sent directly to HUD concerning
I claims of discrimination. The Authority has not received
'Housing
any
formal complaints from residents in Rancho Cucamonga.
I
4.3 Fair Housing Services
I
lypically, fair housing services include the investigation and resolution of
i housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing/testing, and
education and outreach including the dissemination of fair housing
information such as written material, workshops, and seminars.
I landlord/tenant counseling services involves informing landlords and
tenants of their rights and respohsibilities under the California Civil Code
and mediating conflicts between tenants and landlords.
I This section provides an overview of current fair housing services in
i Rancho Cucamonga.
i 4.3.1 Inland Fair Housing Mediation Board (IFHMB)
The City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Inland Fair Housing and
I Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing and landlord/tenant
services. Fair Housing education is a major component of IFHMB's
program with a goal of providing the knowledge of fair housing to all
I partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided
through radio programming~ mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web
I site (http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html). Enforcement is
provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB or related
enforcement agency. And finally, testing is used as a tool to gather
I evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to
accomplish the objectives identified in the City's Fair Housing Analysis by
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-11
,4nal~sis of Impediment~ to Fair Housing Choice
providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal
referral of fair housing issues within the community.
Training~ Education, and Outreach
,~ part of it~ services to the City, IFHMB has been actively
involved in outreach activities in Rancho Cucamonga,
including the provision of informational materials,
brochures, newsletters, and. referrals relating to fair
housing. IFHMB 'also provides a number of workshops,
presentations, and seminars to community organizations.
Recent presentations were given to staff and volunteers at
the Foothill Family Shelter, the Inland Empire Regional.
Opportunity Counseling Program, at City Hall for staff, and
throughout other locations in Ranch Cucamonga. Fair
housing radio programs and public service announcements are broadcast
regularly on local radio and television stations in both English and Spanish.
Recently, a bilingual TV broadcast was provided on Channel 24 (KVCR).
The IFHMB also provides mediation issues regarding ADA compliance in
transportation services. ~ ~
In conjunction with National Fair Housing Month celebrated each April,
IFHMB organizes a community presentation and workshop to discuss fair
housing issues. For April 2002, IFHMB organized the workshop as a mock
trial to educate city/county staff and officials, apartment owners and
managers, public/nonprofit agencies, among others the issues facing
persons with disabilities. The event was attended by 180 participants.
IFHMB also conducts a Certified Residential Manager's (CRM) Course
through the Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire (AAGIE)
and mails a Fair Housing Quarterly Newsletters to over 300 rental property
owners in the City. Additional literature is disseminated to Rancho
Cucamonga public agencies and community groups (over 2,000
brochures/flyers in any typical year).
Page 4-12 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Current Fair Housing Profile
Fair Housing Complaints and Testing
I
HUD's Fair Housing initiative Program (FHIP) provides funding to qualified
i fair housing agencies to conduct testing on alleged discrimination cases.
Funding is provided to agencies for a two-year period and is awarded on a
competitive basis.
I IEHMB conducted a test in Rancho Cucamonga, in which lending
discrimination involving race occurred.
I
4.3.2 [air Housing Complaints, Violations, and Suits
I IFHMB works in partnership with HUD and the State Department of [air
Employment and Housing (DF[H). 'After a person calls in for a complaint,
I an interview takes place, documentation is obtained and issues are
discussed to decide on the course to proceed. Mediation/conciliation is
offered as a viable alternative to litigation. If the mediation/conciliation is
I successful, the is closed after a brief case follow-up. If the
case
mediation/conciliation is unsuccessful, the case is then referred to DFEH or
i HUD. If during case development further investigation is deemed
necessary, testing may be performed. Once the investigation is
completed, the complainant is advised of the alternatives available in
I proceeding with the complaint, which include: mediation/conciliation,
administrative filing with HUD or DFEH, referral for consideration to the
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Housing and Civil
I Enforcement Section, or referral to a private attorney for possible litigation.
Once the complaint has been referred, IFHM8 monitors the case to its
final outcome. Table 4-1 presents some cases that illustrate the typical
I handled and the available for their
complaints
in
the
region
options
resolution.
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-13
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
lable 4-1: lypical Examples of [air Housing Complaints in the Region
Complaint Case Description Action and Resolution
The initiator feels she is being IFHMB, contacted the management company
Disability
discriminated against because of her and explained that a full time caretaker is not a
disability. She is mentally disabled and resident and does not enjoy the benefits of a
recently had a child. The initiator tenant. The caretaker should not be made to
needed a caretaker and she informed quali~ for the apartment as if she were a tenant.
management and had her mother come IFHMB also explained that the tenant is
and live with her as a full time responsible for the conduct of their caretaker
caretaker. Management responded and that all rules and regulations should be~
with a 3 day perform or quit notice to followed. The management company did allow
remove the unauthorized resident, the initiator the reasonable accommodation of
IFHMB advised the initiator that she having a live-in caretaker, and the initiator was
needed to have a letter from her advised of their right to file a complaint with the
doctor, which verified that she required Department of Housing .. and Urban
a caretaker because of the disability. Development (HUD), Department of Fair
Initiator requested that IFHMB contact Employment and Housing (DFEH), Department
the management company to help of Jusfice(DOJ)oraprivateattomey.
resolve this issue.
The initiator feels she may be being The initiator was advised of her right to
Race
discriminated against because of her conciliation or filing a complaint with the
race. She has recently been given a Department of Housing and Urban
rent increase. The initiator explains that Development (HUD), Department of Fair
all prior rent increases were given to her Employment and Housing (DFEH), Department
inwriting, advising of the amount of the of Justice (DOJ) or a private attorney. The
increase and information regarding the initiator stated she will consider filing and will
market rate. This last increase was not call IFHMB if further assistance is needed.
in writing and the initiator has found
out that she is presently paying market
rate. The initiator has requested an
explanation in writing as to how
management raises their rents.
Management has advised they cannot
~ruvide that information in writing.
fbmilialStatus Initiator feels she was discriminated IFHMB explained to initiator that a 55+ park
against because of her familial status, can require that all residents be 5.5 years of age
She and her family have been staying or older, initiator was advised that she should
with her seventy year old mother in a m/ to vacate the premises within the allotted
5.5+ mobile homepark. They beganto time to avoid problems for her mother.
receive notices that her mother was in Explained that the initiator and her mother may
violation of the park rules and that be evicted for not complying with the rules and
100% of the park is 55 years old or rel~ulations of the park. IFHM8 provided the
older and that the initiator must leave initiator with information on Iow income
the premises in order for her mother to housing. Initiator will try to move as soon as
mmain atthepark. ~essible and will contact IFH/vtg if further
assistance is needed.
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board: February 2001
Page 4-14 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Current Fair Housing Profile
Based on records provided by IFHMB, the number of Rancho Cucamonga
households that received counseling fluctuates. For Fiscal Year 2001-
2002, IFHMB reported an average of one to two complaints a month. For
FY 2000-2001, a total of 67 households were assisted (Table 4-2). General
complaints, which receive over the phone counseling/referral, are reported
separately from cases that are actually conciliated. The number of
complaints received since 1997 continued to decrease yearly by rather
significant numbers.
With regard to discrimination categories, most complainants consistently
claim discrimination based on race and color, national origin, familial
status, and disability more so than other categories. Between 1997 and
1999, the majority of complaints were filed by White and Black
households; however, this trend shifted to include an increasing number of
Hispanics at the beginning of FY 1999-2000 (Table 4-3).
,,
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-.1 :~
Table 4-2: Fai~ Housing'Complaints duly 1, 1997-June 30, 2001) - ·
1997/98 1998/99' . ' . 1999~000 2000/01
To~l C0mplainb 271 . 126 ~ 67
~t~o~ ~s~ ~slsted ~ ~s~ ~sist~ ~s~ ~sisted ~sist~
~ce & Color ~4 52 8 25 4 ~ 26
Na~onal O~n I 3 7 1 1. 3 30 ~4
Familial 5a~s 5 16 2 8 1 4 6
~Gender 3 6 2. . 4 .' 0 0 0'
Religion 2~ 6 0 0 0 0 0
~u~e of Income 0 0 0 0' 1 4 2
Fami~ S~ms & Source of Income 0 0 - 0 ~ 0 0 0 5
Familial S~tus & Di~bi~i~ 0 0 '* 0 0 0 0 3
Di~bili~ & Sexual Orien~fion 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2
Di~bili~ & 5ource of Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
To~l C~ Beneficiaries 30 95 20 56 14 69 67
Souse: Inland Fair Housing and M~ia~on Board ~nual Re~ 2~2001,
Page ~16 Ci~ of ~ncho Cucamon~
I
Current Fair Housing Profile
I
I Table 4-3: Fair Housing Complaints by Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01
White 21 14 17 18
I Hispanic 8 6 24 18
Asian 0 2 0 0
Black 19 t 3 11 31
I Other 2 I 8 0
Female HH* 13 9 6 20
Total 50 36 60 67
I *Not included in tOtal
Source: Inland Fair Housin§ and Mediation Board Annual Repo~ 2000-2001.
I 4.3.3 Tenant/Landlord Disputes
In addition to fair housing complaints, Rancho Cucamonga residents
I receive assistance from IFHMB for tenant/landlord dispute resolution
services. Between July 2000 and June 2001, IFHMB handled 145
I complaints or requests for assistance. Of these persons, approximately 52
percent were White, 26 percent were Hispanic, 17 percent were Black,
and 3 percent was Asian. In addition, female-headed households filed 43
I percent of the total complaints. The complaints received by IFHMB were
related to rights and responsibilities' and deposits (Tables 4°4 and 4-5).
I Table 4-4: Landlord/Tenant Services (July 1, 2000-June 30, 2001)
Issues Number of Disputes/Cases
Evi~ons 28
I Rishts and Responsibilities 46
Deposits 31
i Repairs ,, 26
Rent Increases 13
Total 144*
i Income Levels
Low 62
Low/Moderate 32
Moderate + 51
I To121 145
*Total is 144 instead of 145, because ol~ 1 mobile home case, which was omitted.
Source: Inland Fair Housin§ and Mediation Board Annual Report, 2000-2001.
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-1 /
"
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Table 4-5: Landlord/Tenant Services by Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01
White 158 211 97 76
Hispanic 50 101 49 38
Asian 5 14 0 4
Black 93 51 33 25
Other 10 ' 18 2 2
Female HH* 92 46 59 62
Total 271 395 181 145
*Not included in total
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Boaffl Annual Report, 2000-2001.
Throughout California, many communities are facing the same issues -
rising rental rates and increasing evictions by landlords. One muSt make
the distinction though, that tenant/landlord disputes are not fair housing
issues per se. Only when the disputes are caused on the basis of race,
color, national origin, ancestry, religion, gender, disability, marital status, or
famd~al status do d~sputes become fa r hous ng ss es. Often, disputes over
evictions are based on econbmic factors, which are not protected under
the fair housing laws. However, given that many Black and Hispanic
households in Rancho Cucamonga are lower income renters, these groups
are disproportionately affected by th~ economics in the rental housing
market. The fair housing issue rests on the adequate supply of affordable
housing for lower income households, particularly for renters.
4.4 Observations by Public and Private
Agencies
Many public and private agencies contacted during the course of research
for this Al are directly or indirectly involved with fair housing issues in
Rancho Cucamonga. Phone interviews were conducted with many of
these agencies. Additional input was provided through a fair housing
workshop.
Approximately 60 public and private agencies were contacted and invited
to attend a fair housing consultation workshop on May 22, 2002, located
at Rancho Cucamonga Council Chambers. Representatives from the Fair
Housing Council of Riverside County and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department attended the workshop and
Page 4-18 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Current Fair Housing Profile
I
provided input on fair housing issues in the City. Commen~s from these
I agencies are categorized and paraphrased below.
i Language Cultural Issues
[] Many Hispanic persons cannot speak English and hav~ difficulty
I communicating.
[] Perception that real estate agents are unwilling to talk with Hispanic
I households because of language barriers or the perception of lower
income levels.
I Lending
I [] Many lending institutions have offices in centralized locations, not
easily accessible by residents in certain neighborhoods.
I [] Some lenders have more strict underwriting criteria that impact
borrowers.
I [] Testing of lending outreach efforts is minimal.
i Real Estate
[] While Realtors are required by the DRE to attend fair housing trainings,
I the classes are taught from a Realtor's perspective, which may bias the
course contenL
I [] Some Realtors are targeting certain groups in the community to
purchase properties at a higher price than market value. Individuals
who have a language barrier or do not understand the home buying
I process are particularly vulnerable.
i [] Requirement by some Realtors for potential homebuyers to obtain pre-
approved certificates prior to showing a for-sale property makes fair
housing testing difficult.
I [] Some real estate agents require home purchasers to use a specific
lender as a requirement to complete the sales transaction.
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4-19
I
"
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housings. Choice
4.5 Hate Crimes '
To a certain degree, hate crimes are an indicator of the environmental
context of discrimination. Hate crimes are crimes that are committed
because of a bias against race, religion, disability, ethnicity, or sexual
orientation. These crimes should be reported to police or sheriff's
department. On the other hand, a hate incident is an action or behavior
that is motivated by hate, but is protected by the First Amendment right to
freedom of expression. Examples of hate incidents can include name
calling, epithets, distribution of hate material in public places, and the
display of offensive hate-motivated material on one's property. The
freedom guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, such as the freedom of
speech, allows hateful rhetoric as long as it does. not interfere with the civil'
rights of others. Only when these incidents escalate " can they be
considered an actual crime.
In an attempt to determine the scope and nature of hate crimes, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting Program
collects statistics on these incidents. According to the FBI, hate crimes
rarely take place in the City. Between 1996 and 2000, six hate crimes
were committed in Rancho Cucamonga, three cases based on race, two
cases on religion, and one case on ethnicity. Hate crimes do not appear to
be a significant issue in Rancho Cucamonga.
Services available to victims include certain rights under the California
Constitution's Victim's Bill of Rights (i.e. information about the prosecution
of the perpetrator, right to present a victim impact statement at the time of
sentencing), and restitution for any loss, damage, or injury incurred.
Pa§e 4-20 City °' Ranch° Cucam°n§~:~ ~./,~/
Current Fair Housing Profile
I
I
I
I
I
I
I This page is intentionally blank.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4.-21
Chapter 5
Public Polides
Public policies may affect the pattern of housing development, availability
of housing choices, as well as access to housing. This chapter of the Al
reviews the various policies that may impact housing choices in Rancho
Cucamonga.
The City's Housing Element, Development Code, Consolidated Plan, Land
Use Element and other documents were reviewed to evaluate the
following potential impediments to fair housin§ choice and affordable
housin§ development:
~I Local municipal, building~ occupancy, health, and safety codes.
[] Public policies and building approvals that add to the cost of housing
development.
[] Moratoriums or §rowth mana§ement plans.
~ Residential development fees.
[] Administrative policies affecting housing activities.
~- Policies that restrict housing or community development resources for
areas of minorib/concentration, or policies that inhibit employment of
minorities or individuals with disabilities.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5-1
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
~.~- Interdepartmental coordination between local agencies that provide
housing or community development resources to areas of minority
concentration or to individuals with disabilities.
[,1 Availability and siting of public transportation and social services for
persons with disabilities.
~.]1 Community representation on planning and municipal boards and
commissions.
5'1 Local Municipal, Building, Occupancy,,
Health and Safety' Codes
5.1.1 Development Code
Higher density housing reduces land cost on a per unit basis and thus
facilitates the development of affordable housing. Restrictive municipal
codes that require unusually large lot and building size can substantially
increase housing costs and can impede housing production.
Each of the land use designations set forth in the City's General Plan
corresponds to one or more of the zoning districts established in the
Development Code. The density requirements specified the Development
Code adhere to the General Plan Land Use Element Policies (Table 5-1 ).
The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Code provide for
a variety of residential zones, lot sizes and density levels to facilitate a
diverse mix of housing types. The General Plan and Development Code
establish six residential categories including Very Low (VL), Low (L), Low
Medium (LM), Medium (M), Medium High (MH), and High (H). Densities
in these categories range from 0.1 to 27 units per acre (Table 5-1). The
General Plan also permits residential development in two of the designated
opens space categories: Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS).
Page 5-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
'Public Policies
Table 5-1: Residential Development Districts Development
and
Standards
Maximum Maximum Minimum Lot
Residential District Density 2 Height Size (Net) Typical Residential Type
Single-family homes on one-
Ve~/Low Residential (VL) 2 du/acre 35 ft m 20,000 half acre lots or larger.
Single family homes in a mom
Low (L) 4 du/acre 35 ft 7,200 traditional subdivision design.
Single-family detached units
along with other housing
Low Medium (L~) 8 du/acm 35 ft 5,000 such as zero lot line units
duplexes and townhomes.
Permits a range
wide
ot
residential types includin§
Medium (M) 14 du/acre 35 fi: 3 acre single-family detached units
attached units, mobile homes
and townhomes.
Characterized by
du/acre 40 ft. 3 acre condominiums and apamnent
Medium-High
(MH)
24
buildings.
Apartment buildings and
High (H) 30 du/acre 40 ft. 3 acre up to
condominium
of
stories in height.
Dependent Dependent upon Guide and stimulate mixed.
Mixed Use 14 du/acre upon Specific Specific Plan use development in special
Plan opportunity areas in the city.
Downhill Lots: Vades; subjectto Maintain the natural characte~
30 ft. hillside iof sensitive areas in the Sphere
Hillside Residential (HR) 2 du/acre Uphill lots: 15development of Influence. Limited single-
family development i.~
ft. regulations.
Protect natural landforms and
areas of open space and
Site by site Site by site basis recreational use. A limited
Open Space/Recreation 1 du/lO acres basis
(OS) amount of single-famil)
residential uses is permitted.
Sources: Rancho Cucamon ~a Zoning Ordinance
Notes:
1. 30 f~ in hillside areas
2. Under Optional Development Standards
3. Includes standards such as slope/capadty factors and environmental studies.
Due to environmental impacts and regulations, the Hillside Residential
designation permits residential units up to 2 dwelling units per acre subject
to building standards and regulations contained in the Hillside
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5-3
Analysis of Impedlments to Fair Housing Choice
Development Ordinance. The Open Space designation is intended to
protect environmentally sensitive land; therefore, the use regulations,
development standards are intended to provide Iow intensity
development. Single-family detached units are permitted not to exceed an
average of one dwelling unit per 10 acres.
The Development Code provides for a wide range of housing types,
including mobile homes, factory-built housing, guest homes, mixed-use
housing, second dwelling units, group care facilities and senior housing.
Development standards such as density, height, setback, and parking are
also specified in the Development Code. State legislation mandates the
inclusion of mobile/home factory built housing in a city's land use policy.
The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code permits mobile homes and'
factory built housing by right in all residential cal~egories.
Requirements for residential development are also contained within two
Community Plans (Terra Vista and Victoria) and in two Specific Plans
(Etiwanda and Etiwanda North). A third Community Plan (Caryn) was
incorporated into the Development Code along with a commercial and
industrial plan. The zoning categories and densities within each of these
plans are generally consistent with~ the General Plan and Development
Code. However, the development standards contained in these plans
have been tailored to meet the specific needs required within each plan.
For example within the Terra Vista and Victoria community plans, more
flexible standards such as cluster development regulations are permitted
within the plans.
Mixed Use
The General Plan also identifies several mixed use designations within the
City as areas of potential residential development. These mixed-use areas
are designated as five Specific Plans and one community plan (Terra Vista).
The zoning categories and densities within each of these plans are
with the General Plan and Development Code but
generally
consistent
also provide more flexible standards, tailored to meet the unique needs of
the project and any physical or environmental constraints. With the
exception of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, the mixed-use designations
are located along Foothill Boulevard, a major commercial corridor that
transverses the community from east to west.
Page 5-4 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
s Public Policies
I
I Table 5-2: Mixed-Use Opportunities
Residential
I Specific Plan Acreage Range Density Examples of Residential Use
Regional Center 109-185 acres 14/du/acm Condominiums, apartments, and
attached and detached single- '
family dwellings
I Town Center I~ode 8-10 acres 14 du/acre Condominiums and apartments
at Foothill and
Haven
I Foothill Boulevard 15- 22.5 14 du/acre Condominiums, apartments, home
acres
between Archibald studios and lofts.
and Hellman
I Western Gateway 16.5 to 27.5 acres 14 du/acre Condominiums and apartments
Terre Vista 6.5 @ 24-30 du/acre or Up. to 24 Condominiums and apar'cments
8.1 @ 14-24 du/acre du/acre
I Industrial -Specific 25- 50 acres Up to Condominiums and apartments
Plan Sub-Area 18 27.75
du/acre
I Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element. 2002.
Housing for Persons with Special Needs
I The Development Code also contains provisions to facilitate development
of housing for special needs groups. These include:
I [] Community Care Facilities: The Lanterman Developmental
Disabilities Services Act (Sections 5115 and 5116) of the California
I Welfare and Institutions Code declares that mentally physically
and
disabled persons are entitled to live in normal residential surroundings.
I The use of property for the care of six or fewer disabled persons is a
residential use for the purpose of zoning. A State-authorized, certified
or licensed family care home, foster home, or a group home serving six
I or fewer disabled persons or dependent and neglected children on a
24-hour-a-day basis is considered a residential use that is permitted in
all residential zones for single-family dwellings. No local agenw can
I impose stricter municipal or building safety
and
standards
on
these
homes.
I The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code permits day care and 24-
hour group care facilities for 6 or fewer persons in all residential zones.
I Day care and 24-hour group care facilities for 7 or more persons are
permitted in all residential zones subject to the approval of a
conditional use permit.
I
City of Rancho Cucamon§a Page 5-5
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
~.~I Second Units: Second units are attached or detached dwelling units
that provide complete independent living facilities for one or more
persons including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking
and sanitation. Second units are permitted on single-family lots in the
Very Low, Low and Low-Medium'residential districts, subject to a
conditional use permit.
H Density Bonuses: The California' Government Code Section 65915, as
amended, requires that a local government grant a density bonus of at
least 25 percent and an additional incentive, or financially equivalent
incentive(s) to a housing developer who agrees to construct at least: 1)
20 percent of the units for Iow income households (50-80 percent
MFI); 2) 10 percent of the units for very Iow income households (0-50.
percent MFI); or 3) 50 percent of the units for senior citizens. The City
uses density bonus provisions governed by State law.
I:.:I Senior Housing Overlay District: To facilitate the construction of
affordable rental housing to meet the needs of senior residents, the
Senior Housing Overlay District has been implemented as part of the
Development Code. The District provides for various development
incentives, including reduction o.f 9n-site parking, density bonuses, and
fee waivers or deductions.
Parking Requirements
The City adopted the following parking standards:
:.~- Single-Family Detached Dwellings (conventional): 2 parking spaces
within a garage
r-~- Studio: 1.3 off-street parking spaces per unit of which I space shall be in a garage or carport
:'~' One bedroom: 1.5 off-street parking spaces per unit of which I space
shall be in a garage or carport
[.'~' Two bedrooms: 1.8 off-street parking spaces per unit of which 1 space
shall be in a garage or carport
['] Three or more bedrooms: 2 off-street parking spaces per unit of
which 2 spaces shall be shall be in a garage or carport
Page 5-6 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Public Policies
~ Four or more bedrooms: 2.3 off-street parking spaces per unit of
I which two spaces shall be in ~ garage or carport.
i Condominium Conversion Ordinance
The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code includes a condominium
I conversion ordinance which establishes a maximum annual limit, defined
as no more than one-half the number of multi-family rental dwellings
added to the City housing stock during the preceding year, for the number
I of multi-family rental units that may be converted to ownership type. T~he
purpose of the ordinance is to:
I 1) Encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing in the
community and a variety of choices of tenure, type, price, and location
I of housing;
2) Maintain and encourage the supply of affordable housing, both'
I ownership and rental, for Iow and moderate income persons; and
3) Promote the residential stability and quality of the community by
I developing neighborhood identity, discouraging displacement of
residents, and facilitating affordable homeownership opportunities and
i rental opportunities for the community.
5.1.2 Building Codes
I The City has adopted the State Uniform Building Code, Mechanical,
Plumbing, Housing and Abatement for Dangerous Building Codes. These
I codes are considered to be the minimum necessary to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare. No local amendment has either been initiated
i or approved that directly affects housing standards or processes.
!
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5-7
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
5.2 Public Policies
5.2.1 General Plan Land Use Element
The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element sets forth the'
City's policies for guiding local development. These policies, together with
existing zoning, establish the amount and distribution of land to be
allocated for various uses throughout the City. The residential land use
categories identified in the General Plan are outlined in Table 5-1.
5.2.2 General Plan Housing Element
The Housing Element is the only element of-the General Plan that is
required to be reviewed by the State. An important component of the
State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)
approval of any housing element includes a determination that the local
jurisdiction's policies do not unduly constrain the maintenance,
improvement, and development of housing for all income levels. The
2000-2004 Housing Element identifies the following goals:
1. Allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of
housing types, maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental
units, and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to
accommodate expected new household formations.
2. Provide housing opportunities that meet the needs of all economic
segments of the community including very Iow, Iow, and moderate-
income households and special needs groups.
3. Promote equal housing opportunities for all economic segments of the
community regardless of race, sex, or religion.
4. Provide quality residential environments which contribute to a well-
functioning community by ensuring residential development which is
not only attractive in design, but which functions to protect the public
safety and welfare, and provide benefits to the community.
5. Conserve and improve the existing housing stock, including structures
of historic significance, and eliminate the causes and spread of blight
by encouraging the investment of public and private funds in housing
rehabilitation and public improvements.
Page 5-8 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Public Policies
6. Provide opportunities so that 30 percent of the persons employed in
the City, may live in the City.
7. Require energy efficiency in all residential developments.
8. Where possible, eliminate governmental constraints.
9. As required by state law, periodically update the housing element,
including evaluation of its in attainment its goal,
effectiveness
of
objectives, policies and programs.
Programs and objectives included in the 2000-2004 Housing Element to
implement these housing goals are: '
~ Homeownership Opportunities: To expand homeownership
opportunities for households interested in purchasing their first home,
the City/Redevelopment Agency has established a number of first time
homebuyer programs.
The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency sponsors a First Time
Homebuyer Program that provides a silent second loan to bridge the
difference between the first mortgage a buyer can qualify for and the
cost to purchase a home. The maximum loan amount is 10 percent of
the purchase price or up to a maximum of $16,000. The loan is
forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 30 years. A free
homebuyer counseling service is also offered to resolve credit, debt,
and savings issues to enable applicants to better qualify for a home
loan.
The Agency also participates in a 34-city California Cities Home
Ownership Authority (CCHOA) program. This program assists
homebuyers who do not meet the normal requirement for
conventional mortgage financing and do not typically qualify for home
ownership assistance programs. CCHOA provides equity for down
payment and settlement costs and permits lease periods to be used to
establish or reestablish the lease-purchaser's credit reputation.
~I Housing Rehabilitation: The City of Rancho Cucamonga implements
a Home Improvement Program supported by CDBG funds. This
program offers three avenues to assist with repairs and improvements
for households with incomes at 80 percent or less of MFh
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5-9
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
1) Home Improvement Grant: Eligible households may receive up to
a $7,500 grant for home improvement and repairs.
2) Deferred Payment Loan: Senior citizens, Iow income households,
and disabled individuals may receive a no-interest loan of up to
$30,000 for substantial home repairs. The full amount of th~ loans '
with the sale or transfer of ownership of the home.
must
be
repaid
3) Emergency Grant: Grants of up to $7,500 are available to fund
emergency repairs that constitute an immediate health or safety,
hazard.
Additional assistance for minor emergency home repairs for eliJerly or
Iow income households is provided through the Oldtimers Foundation.
This program provides a grant of up to $100 per visit, with up to two
visits, to fund to include minor emergency repairs such plumbing,
electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs.
-'-'- Preservation of Existing and Future Affordable Housing: The Ranc~ho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency works with the Northtown
Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) to implement an
acquisition and rehabilitation program in the North:own target
neighborhood where NHDC purchases homes and rehabilitates homes
and then sells or rents the homes to low-income households.
The City also continues to implement a Condominium Conversion
Ordinance that provides protection to tenants of apartment units
proposed for conversion to condominium ownership.
~] Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities: The City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Redevelopment Agency continue to work with a
number of providers of affordable rental housing in the community.
Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHCD) has
acquired and rehabilitated over 1,000 apartment units in the City, and
maintains these units at rates affordable to Iow income households.
As part of the City's recently adopted 2000-2004 Housing Element and
Redevelopment Agency Housing Production Plan, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga is exploring the development of several new affordable
housing programs. One of these programs will investigate the feasibility
of establishing an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone using the City's
existing Senior Housing Overlay Zone as a model.
Page 5-10 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
Public Policies
I The City will also investigate establishing a Mixed-Use overlay zone to
facilitate the development of affordable housing. The overlay zone will
i introduce residential units above ground level into commercial and
industrial districts where design opportunities exi~ The mixed-use
overlay zone may be combined with the Affordable Housin'g Overlay
m Zone.
The State HCD has found the 2000-2004 Rancho Cucamon~ Housing
m Element in compliance with State laM. This compliance status affirms that
the City has evaluated its public policies as potential constraints to the
maintenance, improvement, and development of housing and has
m adequately addressed all potential constraints through housing policies and
programs.
m
$.3 MOratoriums/Growth Management
I
Rancho Cucamonga does not have building moratoriums or growth
m management plans that limit housing construction.
I 5.4 Development Fees/Assessments
m The development fees charged for a multi-family or single-family
residential project by the City are comparable to fees charged by other
cities in the region and do not pose a significant constraint upon
m development. In addition, the City offers reduced fees or modified
development standards for projects that provide units affordable for senior
and lower income households. The State MCD did not identify
m development fees as constraints to housing development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5-11
I
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
5.5 Community Representation I
The Planning Commission makes decisions on various land use matters,
such as subdivisions, variances, conditional use permits. The Commission I
also makes recommendations to the City Council regarding General Plan .
and zone changes, new ordinances, and other matters of public interest. I
Some basic goals of the Planning Commission are:
· '-] Implement the General Plan policies '1
[,] Protect natural environment
I],] Protect community identity
-~'] Promote attractive and technically sound development I
~1 Preserve historic and cultural resource
Decisions are reached through a public hearing process, making it I
~. important for community residents to attend meetings to address those
issues which are of particular concern. I
The Planning Commission is comprised of five residents of the City. Each
Planning Commission member is appointed by the City Council for a four- I
year term. The Planning Commission is presently composed of four men
and one woman. The City policies for selecting Planning Commission
members are not discriminatory. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 5-12 City of Rancho Cucamonga
Chapter 6
Conclusions and Actions
This previous chapters identify common
problems and barriers to fair housing in
Rancho Cucamonga. Building upon the
previous analysis, the City outlines its actions
to address impediments to the fair housing in
th is chapter.
6.1 Potential Impediments
The following is a list of key potential impediments that may exist in
Rancho Cucamonga.
Housing and Household Characteristics
~l The population of Rancho Cucamonga has experienced significant
changes in regards to race and ethnicity. From 1990 to 2000, the
proportion of Hispanic residents increased from 20 percent to 28
percent, while the proportion of White residents decreased from 69
percent to 55 percent. Reflective of this change, the proportion of fair
housing complaints filed by Hispanic persons has increased.
~1 Compared to other neighboring communities, housing prices within
Rancho Cucamonga are relatively affordable. The median price for a
single-family home sold in Rancho Cucamonga in 2001 was $212,750.
The median price for condominium unit was $135,000. Thus, most of
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6-1
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
the moderate-income households can afford many of the smaller
single-family homes and most of the condominiums available on the
market. However, affordable housing opportunities remain limited for
lower income households. Furthermore, downpayment and closing
costs may be obstacles to such households in ac,hieving
homeownership.
[] As is the case in most Southern California communities, Iow and
moderate-income households are disproportionately affected by the
problems of housing cost burden and overcrowding.
·Almost 83 percent of lower income households have a high housing
cost burden.
· Lower income large families are particular susceptible to
overcrowding. Approximately 41 percent of Iow- moderate income
large families live in overcrowded conditions,
Access to Financing
~'~- While conventional home financing is generally available to Rancho
Cucamonga residents, the majority of home purchase loan applications
originated from upper income households. Lower income
were
households filed fewer applications and had higher denial rates and
lower approval rates than upper income households.
[': Black, Hispanic, and Asian applicants for home purchase loans had
noticeably lower approval rates than White applicants.
I:.~- Hispanic and Black households had noticeably lower approval rates for home improvement loans than White and Asian households.
[] Approval rates differ significantly by lender. Among the top ten lenders
in the City, the discrepancy in approval rates was 36 percentage
active
points in 2000.
;'3 A large proportion of applications among several top lenders were
closed or withdrawn.
[] Most lending is provided by mortgage companies that do not operate
local offices.
Page 6-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Conclusions and Actions
[] Use of govemment-backed financing is limited.
I
[] Predatory lending appears to be a rising concern in many communities
i but proof of predatory lending is difficult to obtain.
Fair Housing Complaints and Services
I ~l The largest proportion of fair housing complaints relates to race,
i national origin, familial status, and disability.
~ Due to language barriers, Hispanic residents may have difficulty
I communicating with real estate agents, home loan lenders, and code
enforcement personnel.
I [] The Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) conducted one
test regarding race in Rancho Cucamonga in 2001 to investigate,
i validity of complaints. The testing concluded racial discrimination.
[] Fair housing training workshops for realtors are provided from a
i realtor's perspective. Contents of the workshops may not facilitate an
understanding between tenants and landlords, and between realtors
and potential buyers.
I -'~ Testing on lending and the homebuying process are difficult.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6-3
I ~/
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice I
6.2 Actions I
While the Al identifies a number of potential issues, certain issues are
beyond the ability of a local jurisdiction to address, such as those related to m
lending practices. The actions identified below represent those that,can be .
feasibly addressed by the City. I
Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Housing affordability alone is not necessarily ~a fair housing issue.'
However, when housing affordability issues interact with other factors
covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, m
and race/ethnicity, fair housing concerns may-arise. Moreover, the fair
housing equation has two sides. One the one side is the ~vailability of a ·
range of housing choices and on the other side is equal access to those
,. choices. Therefore, a community must ensure that it has a range of
housing choices to meet the various needs of all income segments in the
community.
Action 1: The City will continue to provide homeownership opportunities I
in the community by promoting the First-Time Homebuyer Program. The
mm
City will focus outreach efforts towards lower income households, ·
particularly to Black, Hispanic, and A~ian households, since they have
m
moFe difficulty obtaining financing. Specifically the City will provide
advertisements and workshops in both Spanish 'and English to inform m
residents about th is program.
m
Time Frame: Ongoing m
Action 2: The City will continue to facilitate the development of housing
for all income groups within the community. The City will focus on m
facilitating affordable housing development through a combination of
financial and regulatory assistance. Specifically, the City will work to [
provide affordable housing throughout the community, avoiding an over-
impaction of specific neighborhoods.
Time Frame: Ongoing m
I
I
Page 6-4 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Conclusions and Actions
Action 3: The City will develop a monitoring system of the R~development
I Agency's lending practices Homebuyer Program, as
for
the
First
Time
this
program is not subject to HMDA.
I Time Frame: By 2003
I Rehabilitation Assistance
i Action 4: The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for
owner-occupied and investor-owned single-family housing in the
community. Existing programs include the Home Improvement Grant,
I Deferred Payment Loan Program, and the Emergency Home improvement
Grant.' The City .will ensure that information about these programs be
provided in the City's brochures, advertisements, and website in both
I English and Spanish.
Time Frame: Ongoing
I
Action 5: The City will ensure that Spanish speaking staff is available to
I assist residents in the City regarding code enforcement, housing
rehabilitation, and other housing services.
I Time Frame: Ongoing
Adion 6: The City will continue to rehabilitate substandard multi-family
I housing in the community.
i Time Frame: Ongoing
Access to Information
I Action- 7: The City will work to expand its website to provide additional
links to housing services and resources, such as a link to the fair housing
I service provider and a link to the Fannie Mae Foundation which offers free
guides and resources for first-time home buyers in both English and
i Spanish.
Time Frame: By 2003
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6-5
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Public Policies and Programs
Action 8: The City will provide developers with federal fair housing guide
information regarding accessibility requirements as part of the land use
entitlement process. In addition, the City may consider incorporating
accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement process.
Time Frame: By 2003
Action 9: The City will continue to pursue affordable housing,
development programs identified in the 2000-2004 Housing Element. To
the extent feasible, the City 'will. facilitate the development of housing
affordable to lower and moderate income households according to the
Regional Housing Needs Allocation identified in 'the Housing Element.
Time Frame: By 2004
Outreach to Lenders
Action 10: The City will work with local lenders and government
institutions to provide outreach to lower income residents about
government-backed financing. The City will encourage local lenders to
provide information in both English and Spanish.
Time Frame: By 2003
Action 11: The City will encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to
hold homebuying workshops in Rancho Cucamonga by local lending
institutions. These workshops should be held in both English and Spanish.
Time Frame: Workshops will be conducted on an annual basis
Action 12: The City will explore regional effort to study predatory lending
issues and support state and federal initiatives to address predatory lending
practices.
Time Frame: Discuss with the fair housing service provider a
regional study of predatory lending in 2002 and
ongoing support of anti-predatory lending initiatives
Page 6-6 City of Rancho Cucamonga
I
i Conclusions and Actions
I Fair Housing Services
I Action 13: The fair housing service provider will continue to conduct fair
housing workshops for residents, apartment owners, and property
managers. The City will encourage the fair housing service provider to
I coordinate with the real estate associations regarding fair housing training.
i Time Frame: Provide training at least once a year
HMDA Monitoring
I Action 14: The fair housing service pro,~ider will monitor complaints
regarding unfair lending, and assess lending patterns 'using the Home
I Mortgage Disclosure Act Data (HMDA) and other data sources.
i Time Frame: Monitor HMDA and other data on an annual basis
Action 15: The City will work with the fair housing service provider to
I ensure that an increased number of fair housing tests be performed in the
City. '~
I Time Frame: Testing to be conducted periodically
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6-7
I
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice i
I
I
I
I
I
This page is intentionally blank. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 6-8 City of Rancho Cucamonga
T H C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: December 18, 2002
TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: Job Creation Status
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In response to questions posed regarding job creation and job development in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, staff has prepared a brief report summarizing these
activities, as well as information related to projected employment.
General Business Growth
During the past three years, more than 1,600 new businesses began operation in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including approximately 176 engineering/
manufacturing firms. As a result of a growing business base, employment figures in
the City have almost doubled since 1991 (growing from 24,670 in 1991 to 47,205 in
2001). Additionally, during this same time period, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
has outpaced the inland Empire every year with regard to job creation. The only
exception was in 2000, when the City and Inland Empire figures were the same.1
· 10-Year Average Job Growth (1991-2001) = 2,250 jobs per year
· 3-Year Average Job Growth (1999-2001) = 3,240 jobs per year
The additional job growth has also increased annual payroll figures for Rancho
Cucamonga-based businesses. Currently, that amount exceeds $1.4 billion
annually. The manufacturing sector provides the highest payroll numbers, and the
largest overall payroll increase within a 10-year period. These manufacturing jobs
include many highly skilled technical positions, where the average pay scale is
~ Source: California Employment Development Department
Page 2
approximately $38,000 per year. Construction and distribution sectors have also
provided high payroll gains over the same ten-year period, where employees in
Rancho Cucamonga earn average salaries of $38,600 and $37,300, respectively.
· 10.Year Average Payroll Growth (1991-2001) -- $88 million per year
· 3-Year Average Payroll Growth (1999-2001) = $134 million per year
In the last year, many major corporations have recently located in Rancho
Cucamonga, and have brought (or will be bringing) additional jobs to the City.
These include...
· ARS National Services, Inc. 230 jobs
· Mercury Insurance Services 700-1000 jobs (est.)
· General Motors Corporation 200 jobs
Several other companies have located and/or expanded their existing operations in
the past year due to positive economic growth, and could potentially require
additional personnel to meet their needs. Some of these companies include...
· Schwarz Paper Company new 189,960 sq. ft. facility
· Sunny Designs new 140,239 sq. ft. facility
· United Parcel Service new 53,000 sq. ft. facility
· EPD Wearnes new 47,200 sq. ft. facility
· Delta Pride new 43,000 sq. ft. facility
· Huttig Building Products additional 43,800 sq. ft.
It should also be noted that even though retail activity accounted for over $1 billion in
taxable sales in 2000, only about 20 percent of afl jobs in Rancho Cucamonga are
retail positions. And although some retail positions pay entry-level salaries, wages
for these jobs can vary greatly. This is especially true for managers of larger stores
who can potentially exceed an annual salary of $100,000 depending on a company's
compensation structure, quota requirements, bonuses, etc. The growth in retail
outlets nationwide is also expected to grow in the coming years, and will create
openings for both new and experienced managers. The trend toward keeping stores
open longer may result in larger managerial staffs to provide supervision during the
additional hours.2 In addition to salary, some larger chains also offer pad-time and
2 Source: California Employment Development Department Labor Market Occupational Guide
Page 3
full time retail employees medical insurance, sick leave, employee discounts, and
other benefits, thus increasing their overall compensation level.
Anticipated Business Growth
A major impact on future job creation in Rancho Cucamonga will be the opening of
the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall. This project is expected to provide up to 3,000
permanent and part-time jobs for local area residents, at all levels. And although the
Mall will boost the number of retail jobs in the community, it is anticipated that the
City will also see an influx of new jobs in other business sectors as well. According
to regional economist John Husing, there are many factors that will influence both
industrial and office employment growth over the next several years in Rancho
Cucamonga.
Industrial Growth:
Due to its advantageous location and availability of space, Rancho Cucamonga is
well positioned to develop additional facilities that will house new manufacturing and
distribution facilities, and provide expansion opportunities for existing companies.
A Rancho Cucamonga location for these business sectors means...
· Availability: New space with 34-40 foot ceilings, 440 amps, high-speed fiber
optics, modern fire suppression systems, wide streets and turning radiuses.
Labor: Employers can take advantage of the City and region's large, skilled
labor pool.
· Location: A strategic location along the new 1-210 freeway through
Pasadena, the 1-15 through Cajon Pass and 1-10 through Banning Pass.
These are the ground access routes linking Southern California to the rest of
the U.S.
· Transportation: Outstanding logistics infrastructure including Ontario
International Airport with its FedEx service and UPS Western Regional
Headquarters, with direct cargo flights to China; Burlington Northern Santa
Fe's intermodal yard in San Bernardino; rail-served sites throughout the city;
and the cross-docks of major LTL trucking firms.
With industrial land quickly developing in Southern California, Rancho Cucamonga
offers:
· A healthy supply of available industrial acreage plus 4 million square feet of
available space from its 26.5 million square foot inventory.
· Average monthly lease rate of $0.36 a square foot, with 250,000 square feet
leasing for $1.09 million a year. That is far below older space in the sub-
Page 4
markets of Los Angeles ($1.29-$2.04 million) or Orange ($1.62-$1.92 million)
counties.
Office Growth:
Looking long term, Rancho Cucamonga's office market is well positioned to capture
professional, technical, and corporate office operations now that thousands of highly
educated workers are migrating to the area due to the Inland Empire's booming
upscale housing market. Rancho Cucamonga is the preferred alternative for these
workers, as evidenced by the purchase of new 3,000-6,000 square foot homes that
are selling for far less than coastal homes (example: Orange County's $512,750
median).
Rancho Cucamonga is attracting the talented professionals needed to maintain a
stable workfome, and offers site advantages that will continue to generate interest by
companies, and provide additional opportunities for growth in the office/professional
sector. Decision-makers are motivated by several factors, including...
· Skilled workforce: Forty-six percent (46%) of the city's 1990-2000 workforce
gain were managers and professionals. Some of these skilled workers will
work for less to stop commuting, creating an incentive for their employers to
join them.
· Loqistics: With the failure of El Toro airport project, combined with flight
restrictions facing LAX, the office market will be aided as Ontario
International Airport becomes Southern California's second major air
gateway.
· Vacant parcels: Rancho Cucamonga already offers a wide range of well-
located undeveloped office sites, plus 233,740 square feet of available space
from its 1.9 million square foot inventory.
· Lower lease rates: The city's average monthly class "A" lease rate is $1.78 a
square foot, with 10,000 square feet leasing for approximately $213,500 a
year. On the new 1-210 freeway, the San Gabriel Valley ($2.02/foot) is
$28,900 higher and Pasadena-Burbank-Glendale ($2.41/foot) is $75,700
higher.
The benefits that Rancho Cucamonga can provide to companies seeking a
preferable corporate, engineering, or manufacturing/distribution address include its
logistical advantages, as well a stable, well-trained workforce. These business-
related incentives, in concert with a community that provides its residents with an
outstanding quality of life, will continue to generate interest in all business sectors.
Page 5
As a result of these new companies moving to Rancho Cucamonga, it is anticipated
that the City will realize a broader business base, and a diverse increase in
employment opportunities. To this end, the Redevelopment Agency has focused on
business attraction and retention projects and programs that will continue to facilitate
business growth in Rancho Cucamonga. These efforts include activities such as
business outreach and assistance programs, marketing, and infrastructure
improvements. Currently, among its many tasks, the Agency is in the process of
updating its Economic Development Strategic Plan, which will provide further
strategies and implementation measures for economic growth in the years to come.
Respectfully submitted,
Lin~a Daniel~TM
Redevelopment Director