Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout143 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 143 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY P.C. 80-01 LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held various public hearings on the Victoria Planned Community beginning on September 16, 1980 and culminating with April 2, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing on the Victoria Planned Community; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed the land use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, design criteria, regulations, implementation sections of the Planned Community text for Victoria; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed the land use plan map for Victoria and required subsequent changes to that map as a result of that review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Division Staff is directed to amend the Official Zoning map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to indicate the subject property as "PC"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Victoria Planned Community relative to its impacts and recommends certification to the City Council. WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby certify the Draft EIR as complete and final statement of the environmental effects of the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Council does hereby adopt P.C. 80-01, Victoria Planned Community, subject to the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution No. 81-37 adopted April 2, 1981 attached hereto as reference, and as amended by the City Council on May 20, 1981. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Citv Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981. AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: None Philliy D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: v Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 81-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VICTORIA PLANNED COM- MUNITY P.C. 80-01 TO BE LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGH- LAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULE- VARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission had held various public hearings on the Victoria Planned Community beginning on September 16, 1980 and culminating with April 2, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the land use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, design cri- teria, regulations, implementation sections of the Planned Community text for Victoria; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the land use plan map for Victoria and required subsequent changes to that map as a result of that review; and WHEREAS, duly advertised public hearings were held relative to the Planning Commission review of the Victoria Planned Community No. 80-01; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Victoria Planned Community relative to its impacts and recommends certification to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approval of Victoria Planned Community No. 80-01, subject to the following conditions: GENERAL 1. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community shall not exceed 8255 dwelling units except as allowed in condition 07. 2. All reference to Planned Community Area shall be eliminated to the satisfaction of the City Planner throughout the text of the Victoria Planned Community. 3. The Planned Community text shall be revised to incorporate all conditions of approval where appropriate and to pro- vide revisions in organization of the text from page 171 to the end of the text to •the satisfaction of the City Planner. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 2 4. Definitions shall be added or deleted to the appendix A to coincide with the additions and/or deletions that have occurred as a result of the revisions in the reg- ulations section to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5. Recreation vehicle storage shall be provided within each residential land use category of low, low-medium, medium, for 25% of the lots or units contained within those units within the Victoria Planned Community. RV storage shall be provided on the site of each development or within the boundaries of the Planned Community as a private recreation vehicle storage lot. Percentage shall be reviewed on an annual basis and may be modified by the Planning Commission. 6. Recreation vehicle storage shall not be permitted in the medium-high or high land use category and shall be restricted by CC&R's, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 7. Affordable housing shall be provided in accordance with the revised regulations text, page 225. 8. All tentative tracts shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to consideration by the Planning Commission and shall comply with Ordinance 86 Growth Management. 9. Forty-five days after City Council consideration for approval of the Victoria Planned Community, a revised text incorporating all of the changes and organizational changes necessary shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and comment prior to a final draft text being reprinted for redistribution to the City Council , the City Clerk, the Planning Commission and Staff. 10. On page 248, local residential streets show a minimum 10-foot setback, an additional "15-foot typical" setback shall be added. 11. Page 250, section 4B4 shall be the same as section 5B3a and b on page 251, i.e. instead of a building separation of a 10-foot minimum, building separation would be (a) 35 feet in height or less, 10-foot minimum, or (b) buildings greater than 35 feet, 15-foot minimum. 12. Page 253, the word provision should be added after No. 1 General. On No. 2, the minimum lot width shall be 150 feet. No. 3, the maximum height shall be indicated at 65 feet with a conditional use permit for any heights greater than 65 feet. 13. Page 234, No. 1 after General, add provision. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 3 14. P 233, No. 3 & 4 should be revised to read: In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria Planned Community, over the 10-15 year life of the Plan, a maximum of 20% variation in the optimum yield may be allowable. Any and all variations shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. The variation in the number of dwelling units within one village may require corresponding decreases in one or more of the other villages to insure that the total number of units do not exceed 8255 within the Planned Community boundary. LAND USE 1. The development process and regional demand for the Regional Related area shall be periodically reviewed to determine the continued viability of the amount of acreage proposed. This review shall not be more than three years apart and begin after the opening of the Regional Center. 2. Prior to consideration of specific designs for the Regional Center a focused E.I.R. shall be prepared on the issuance of traffic, aesthetics and long and short term impacts of the proposed project. 3. The Village Commercial Shopping Center proposed at the northeast corner of Milliken and Base Line Road shall be eliminated and replaced with medium-high Land Use. 4. Prior to the approval of any tract within any of the villages containing proposed school facilities the School District involved must consent in writing to the need and location for school facility. Additionally, the sites reserved for schools shall be sufficient in size for the needs of the school district. This does not preclude meeting any requirements of the currently adopted Growth Management Ordinance. CIRCULATION 1. Rochester Avenue shall be continued from Base Line to Highland. 2. Highland Avenue shall be constructed at a 64-foot curb to curb section to accommodate 5 lanes of traffic, specific alignment, and design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 4 3. At the time of development at the intersections of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard plans shall be prepared by the applicant coordinating the frontage road design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. 4. Should any of the streets that cross the Pacific Electric rail tracts (i.e. Milliken, Rochester, Day Creek) require grade separation, the applicant shall be required to pre- pare preliminary design studies to determine configuration and right-of-way requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The applicant shall prepare a detailed traffic analysis detailing the circulation elements such as street location, freeway interchange, street size, etc. , for the regional shopping center and the regional related areas. Such analysis shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and may be included in the Focused EIR for the Regional Center. 6. Precise alignment studies and rights-of-way limits will be required to be prepared by the applicant, including but not limited to, Victoria Parkway, local collectors, etc. , to be concurrent with the consideration of approval of any tentative tract maps involving significant alignment features of any unprecised street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. Street standards shall confonform to those of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or as may be amended to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (Victoria Parkway shall be exempt from standard street requirements subject to the approval of the City Planner and City Engineer. PARKS/OPEN SPACE 1. The lakes are approved in concept only. Further detailed studies shall be submitted to the City prior to any tentative tract approvals for a village that contains a lake. The detailed studies shall indicate the con- struction techniques of the lake, the details of main- tenance of the lake, and cost estimates for maintenance. 2. The City shall approve the selection of a lake consultant to be hired by and paid for by the applicant for the lakes proposed in Victoria Parkway and the two proposed public lakes, exclusive of the lakes contained within the regional area. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 5 3. Park credit for paseos, village parks, Victoria Parkway and the two northernmost Lakes excluding the Lake in the regional center, shall be credited 100% towards park in lieu fees at the time of building permit issuance. 4. Each park area within each village shall be dedicated to the City in a complete form including, but not limited to, installed parking areas, seeded play areas, irrigation and restrooms prior to the construction of greater than 200 dwelling units of the lots within the village. Park design shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Commur"i Services and consistent with the Victoria Plan- ned Conio:lunities and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 5. Concession stands shall be studied to determine the economic feasibility; the economic feasibility study shall be prepared by the applicant or their consultants and submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Services and Planning Division prior to the construction of any concession stands being located on or about the lake edge. 6. The equestrian trail continued within Victoria Parkway shall begin at Deer Creek and terminate at the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Specific design of the trail shall be subject to City review. Equestrian fences, grading, soil samples, may be required. 7. Maintenance of dedicated areas shall be by citywide maintenance district. INFRASTRUCTURE 1. The developer shall participate through financial contri- butions and/or construction of storm drain facilities within the Day Creek and that drainage area in accordance with a to-be-adopted master plan for Day Creek. Development will be allowed to take place within the drainage area so long as flood protection is provided by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or the San Bernardino Flood Control District. 2. Prior to any substantial development in any of the four villages, a solution for sewage treatment shall be selected by the City and/or the Cucamonga County Water District. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 6 3. Adequate fire protection through either expansion of Fire Station No. 3 or the addition of another fire station or the relocation of the existing fire station shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire District. RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANNING 1. Page 184, add the word minimum in the setbacks paragraph under "garage". 2. Page 185, the paragraph setbacks under side yard, add the words "each side". The new phrase would read "side yard: 5-foot minimum each side." 3. Page 186, directly under the graphic, the words variable height fence by developer on Victoria Parkway property line should indicate that fence height shall not exceed 5 feet from the highest finished grade. 4. Under setbacks garage, add the words "requires garage door openers" after 5-8 feet and add the word "minimum" after 18 feet. 5. Under side yard indicate 5-foot for each side yard rather than 10 feet between buildings. 6. On page 187 indicate in parantheses under the graphic after the phrase developer to provide fencing on corner lots and adjacent to community trail system "(see page 189)". 7. Under setbacks, garage, add the words "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. Also, indicate what width sidewalks and location of said sidewalks. 8. Page 188, indication of minimum parking requirements may require a change in the Rancho Cuamonga Parking Ordinance. Should the ordinance not change, the indication of minimum parking standard shall be amended to be consistent with current code requirements. Also there is no indication of the kinds of sidewalks or location of sidewalks. 9. Page 188 under setbacks garage, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. 10. Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add the words "5-foot maximum" so the phrase will read, "5-foot maximum back yard fence adjacent to trail by developer. Resolution No. 81-37 Page 7 11. Page 190 under garage setback, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet and add the words "or sidewalk" after curb so the phrase will read garage setback: 5 to 8 feet (requires garage door openers) from back of curb or sidewalk. The indication under garage setback of the parking requirement is in excess of what current code requirements are and shall indicate code requirements. 12. Page 193 under the graphic indicates minimum of one covered parking space per dwelling, additional spaces as specified in Part III. This requirement is different from the existing parking code and shall be consistent code requirements. 13. Under the graphic there is an indication where sound attenuation walls are required they may not be needed to be continuous but may work satisfactorily when broken or staggared. The words "however, in all cases these must be consistent with the adopted Noise Ordinance" shall be added. 14. Page 196 under the first graphic, the words "automatic garage door openers required" shall be added after 5 to 8 feet. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2nd day of April , 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: