HomeMy WebLinkAbout143 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 143
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY P.C. 80-01 LOCATED
SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held various public
hearings on the Victoria Planned Community beginning on September 16,
1980 and culminating with April 2, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public
hearing on the Victoria Planned Community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed
the land use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, design
criteria, regulations, implementation sections of the Planned Community
text for Victoria; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed
the land use plan map for Victoria and required subsequent changes to
that map as a result of that review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division Staff is directed to amend the
Official Zoning map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to indicate the
subject property as "PC"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft Environmental
Impact Report on the Victoria Planned Community relative to its impacts
and recommends certification to the City Council.
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby certify the Draft EIR as
complete and final statement of the environmental effects of the proposed
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
City Council does hereby adopt P.C. 80-01, Victoria Planned Community,
subject to the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution
No. 81-37 adopted April 2, 1981 attached hereto as reference, and as
amended by the City Council on May 20, 1981.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Citv Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Philliy D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
v Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 81-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VICTORIA PLANNED COM-
MUNITY P.C. 80-01 TO BE LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGH-
LAND AVENUE GENERALLY NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULE-
VARD AND GENERALLY WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission had held various public
hearings on the Victoria Planned Community beginning on September
16, 1980 and culminating with April 2, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the land
use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, design cri-
teria, regulations, implementation sections of the Planned Community
text for Victoria; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the land use
plan map for Victoria and required subsequent changes to that map as
a result of that review; and
WHEREAS, duly advertised public hearings were held relative
to the Planning Commission review of the Victoria Planned Community
No. 80-01; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Draft
Environmental Impact Report on the Victoria Planned Community relative
to its impacts and recommends certification to the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approval of Victoria Planned
Community No. 80-01, subject to the following conditions:
GENERAL
1. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within
the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community shall
not exceed 8255 dwelling units except as allowed in
condition 07.
2. All reference to Planned Community Area shall be
eliminated to the satisfaction of the City Planner
throughout the text of the Victoria Planned Community.
3. The Planned Community text shall be revised to incorporate
all conditions of approval where appropriate and to pro-
vide revisions in organization of the text from page
171 to the end of the text to •the satisfaction of the
City Planner.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 2
4. Definitions shall be added or deleted to the appendix
A to coincide with the additions and/or deletions that
have occurred as a result of the revisions in the reg-
ulations section to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
5. Recreation vehicle storage shall be provided within each
residential land use category of low, low-medium, medium,
for 25% of the lots or units contained within those
units within the Victoria Planned Community. RV storage
shall be provided on the site of each development or
within the boundaries of the Planned Community as a
private recreation vehicle storage lot. Percentage shall
be reviewed on an annual basis and may be modified by
the Planning Commission.
6. Recreation vehicle storage shall not be permitted in
the medium-high or high land use category and shall
be restricted by CC&R's, subject to review and approval
of the City Attorney.
7. Affordable housing shall be provided in accordance with
the revised regulations text, page 225.
8. All tentative tracts shall be reviewed by the Design
Review Committee prior to consideration by the Planning
Commission and shall comply with Ordinance 86 Growth
Management.
9. Forty-five days after City Council consideration for
approval of the Victoria Planned Community, a revised
text incorporating all of the changes and organizational
changes necessary shall be submitted to the City Planner
for review and comment prior to a final draft text being
reprinted for redistribution to the City Council , the
City Clerk, the Planning Commission and Staff.
10. On page 248, local residential streets show a minimum
10-foot setback, an additional "15-foot typical" setback
shall be added.
11. Page 250, section 4B4 shall be the same as section 5B3a
and b on page 251, i.e. instead of a building separation
of a 10-foot minimum, building separation would be (a)
35 feet in height or less, 10-foot minimum, or (b)
buildings greater than 35 feet, 15-foot minimum.
12. Page 253, the word provision should be added after No.
1 General. On No. 2, the minimum lot width shall be
150 feet. No. 3, the maximum height shall be indicated
at 65 feet with a conditional use permit for any heights
greater than 65 feet.
13. Page 234, No. 1 after General, add provision.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 3
14. P 233, No. 3 & 4 should be revised to read:
In order to provide flexibility in the development of the
Victoria Planned Community, over the 10-15 year life of
the Plan, a maximum of 20% variation in the optimum yield
may be allowable.
Any and all variations shall be reviewed and approved by
the Design Review Committee.
The variation in the number of dwelling units within one
village may require corresponding decreases in one or
more of the other villages to insure that the total
number of units do not exceed 8255 within the Planned
Community boundary.
LAND USE
1. The development process and regional demand for the
Regional Related area shall be periodically reviewed to
determine the continued viability of the amount of acreage
proposed. This review shall not be more than three years
apart and begin after the opening of the Regional Center.
2. Prior to consideration of specific designs for the Regional
Center a focused E.I.R. shall be prepared on the issuance
of traffic, aesthetics and long and short term impacts of
the proposed project.
3. The Village Commercial Shopping Center proposed at the
northeast corner of Milliken and Base Line Road shall be
eliminated and replaced with medium-high Land Use.
4. Prior to the approval of any tract within any of the
villages containing proposed school facilities the School
District involved must consent in writing to the need and
location for school facility. Additionally, the sites
reserved for schools shall be sufficient in size for the
needs of the school district. This does not preclude
meeting any requirements of the currently adopted Growth
Management Ordinance.
CIRCULATION
1. Rochester Avenue shall be continued from Base Line to
Highland.
2. Highland Avenue shall be constructed at a 64-foot curb to
curb section to accommodate 5 lanes of traffic, specific
alignment, and design shall be to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 4
3. At the time of development at the intersections of Highland
Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and at the intersection of
Highland Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard plans shall be
prepared by the applicant coordinating the frontage road
design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans.
4. Should any of the streets that cross the Pacific Electric
rail tracts (i.e. Milliken, Rochester, Day Creek) require
grade separation, the applicant shall be required to pre-
pare preliminary design studies to determine configuration
and right-of-way requirements to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
5. The applicant shall prepare a detailed traffic analysis
detailing the circulation elements such as street location,
freeway interchange, street size, etc. , for the regional
shopping center and the regional related areas. Such
analysis shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and may be included in the Focused EIR for
the Regional Center.
6. Precise alignment studies and rights-of-way limits will
be required to be prepared by the applicant, including
but not limited to, Victoria Parkway, local collectors,
etc. , to be concurrent with the consideration of approval
of any tentative tract maps involving significant alignment
features of any unprecised street to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
7. Street standards shall confonform to those of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga or as may be amended to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer (Victoria Parkway shall be exempt
from standard street requirements subject to the approval
of the City Planner and City Engineer.
PARKS/OPEN SPACE
1. The lakes are approved in concept only. Further detailed
studies shall be submitted to the City prior to any
tentative tract approvals for a village that contains
a lake. The detailed studies shall indicate the con-
struction techniques of the lake, the details of main-
tenance of the lake, and cost estimates for maintenance.
2. The City shall approve the selection of a lake consultant
to be hired by and paid for by the applicant for the lakes
proposed in Victoria Parkway and the two proposed public
lakes, exclusive of the lakes contained within the
regional area.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 5
3. Park credit for paseos, village parks, Victoria Parkway
and the two northernmost Lakes excluding the Lake in the
regional center, shall be credited 100% towards park in
lieu fees at the time of building permit issuance.
4. Each park area within each village shall be dedicated
to the City in a complete form including, but not limited
to, installed parking areas, seeded play areas, irrigation
and restrooms prior to the construction of greater than
200 dwelling units of the lots within the village. Park
design shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of
Commur"i Services and consistent with the Victoria Plan-
ned Conio:lunities and reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission.
5. Concession stands shall be studied to determine the
economic feasibility; the economic feasibility study
shall be prepared by the applicant or their consultants
and submitted to and approved by the Department of Community
Services and Planning Division prior to the construction
of any concession stands being located on or about the
lake edge.
6. The equestrian trail continued within Victoria Parkway
shall begin at Deer Creek and terminate at the Pacific
Electric right-of-way. Specific design of the trail
shall be subject to City review. Equestrian fences,
grading, soil samples, may be required.
7. Maintenance of dedicated areas shall be by citywide
maintenance district.
INFRASTRUCTURE
1. The developer shall participate through financial contri-
butions and/or construction of storm drain facilities
within the Day Creek and that drainage area in accordance
with a to-be-adopted master plan for Day Creek. Development
will be allowed to take place within the drainage area
so long as flood protection is provided by the developer
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or the
San Bernardino Flood Control District.
2. Prior to any substantial development in any of the four
villages, a solution for sewage treatment shall be
selected by the City and/or the Cucamonga County Water
District.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 6
3. Adequate fire protection through either expansion
of Fire Station No. 3 or the addition of another fire
station or the relocation of the existing fire station
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Foothill
Fire District.
RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANNING
1. Page 184, add the word minimum in the setbacks paragraph
under "garage".
2. Page 185, the paragraph setbacks under side yard, add
the words "each side". The new phrase would read
"side yard: 5-foot minimum each side."
3. Page 186, directly under the graphic, the words variable
height fence by developer on Victoria Parkway property
line should indicate that fence height shall not exceed
5 feet from the highest finished grade.
4. Under setbacks garage, add the words "requires garage door
openers" after 5-8 feet and add the word "minimum" after
18 feet.
5. Under side yard indicate 5-foot for each side yard rather
than 10 feet between buildings.
6. On page 187 indicate in parantheses under the graphic
after the phrase developer to provide fencing on corner
lots and adjacent to community trail system "(see page
189)".
7. Under setbacks, garage, add the words "requires garage
door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. Also, indicate what
width sidewalks and location of said sidewalks.
8. Page 188, indication of minimum parking requirements may
require a change in the Rancho Cuamonga Parking Ordinance.
Should the ordinance not change, the indication of minimum
parking standard shall be amended to be consistent with
current code requirements. Also there is no indication
of the kinds of sidewalks or location of sidewalks.
9. Page 188 under setbacks garage, add "requires garage door
openers" after 5 to 8 feet.
10. Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add
the words "5-foot maximum" so the phrase will read,
"5-foot maximum back yard fence adjacent to trail by
developer.
Resolution No. 81-37
Page 7
11. Page 190 under garage setback, add "requires garage door
openers" after 5 to 8 feet and add the words "or sidewalk"
after curb so the phrase will read garage setback: 5
to 8 feet (requires garage door openers) from back of
curb or sidewalk. The indication under garage setback
of the parking requirement is in excess of what current
code requirements are and shall indicate code requirements.
12. Page 193 under the graphic indicates minimum of one covered
parking space per dwelling, additional spaces as specified
in Part III. This requirement is different from the
existing parking code and shall be consistent code
requirements.
13. Under the graphic there is an indication where sound
attenuation walls are required they may not be needed to
be continuous but may work satisfactorily when broken
or staggared. The words "however, in all cases these
must be consistent with the adopted Noise Ordinance" shall
be added.
14. Page 196 under the first graphic, the words "automatic
garage door openers required" shall be added after 5
to 8 feet.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 2nd day of April , 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: