The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-236 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 02-236 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PER DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321 - AMENDING THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, TO ELIMINATE MISSION PARK DRIVE EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 209-263-68 A. RECITALS. 1. Oltman's Investment Company filed an application to amend the Development Code, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 22, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to initiate an amendment to delete Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial Park and General Industrial Districts (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively) and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing that recommended approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2002-0321 recommending to the City Council that the said Development Code Amendment be approved. 4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Code Amendment is included as a part of the attached draft Ordinance. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the environmental determination prepared for said project, DRC2002-00321 Development Code Amendment. Related Project: DRC2001-00718 — Development Review. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby specifically finds that the Amendment for "the application" and each and every term and provision contained herein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. i Resolution No. 02-236 Page 2 of 8 3. This Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Development Code to permit the elimination of Mission Park Drive, east of Buffalo Avenue, as described in "the application" — DRC2002-00321 and as specified in the attached draft Ordinance. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 215`day of August 2002. AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None William J. exander, Mayor ATTE:T: Kat iiLScott, OepuT ty City Clerk I, KATHRYN L. SCOTT, DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucarronga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approv=d and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 21" day of August 2002. Executed this 22nd day of August 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. i ' KK Kathiiyn L. ott, Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 02-236 Page 3 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. 60 / AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, TO AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF MISSION PARK DRIVE EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE BY AMENDING SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURES 17.30.080-0 AND 17.30.080-N OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. On May 22, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly"noticed public hearing.nn a request to initiate an application to amend the Development.Code to delete Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial Park and General Industrial District (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively). The Planning Commission moved to direct staff to process said amendment to the Development Code. 2. Oltman's Investment Company filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00321 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as"the application. 3. On July 10, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 02-65, recommending to the City Council that the Development Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00321 be approved. 4. On August 21, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. approving the Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00321. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 232 ReS011tlon No. 02-236 Page �- of 8 OFAINANCE NO. DF.C2002-00321 August 21, 2002 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 21, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring Program, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water a minimum of twice per day, or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily z39 Resolution No. 02-236 Page 5 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00321 August 21, 2002 Page 3 to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. This will result in a minimum reduction of 68 percent of PM10 emissions during grading. 2) Public roads used for access to the site (Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue) shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. The site access haul road will be watered a minimum of twice daily. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. This will result in approximately three percent reduction of PM10 emissions. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Emissions reduction no quantifiable. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. This will result in five percent reductions of ROG, NOx, andPM10 emissions. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) The construction contractor shall use low VOC asphalt during the asphalt paving portions of the project. Trak 1) To mitigate the impacted intersections to LOS D or better, the applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. These include but are not limited to widening roadways to their full 2yD Resolution No. 02-236 Page f of 8 DRDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00321 4ugust 21, 2002 'age 4 width to add additional lanes, restriping existing roads to add additional lanes, signalizing intersections, or other improvements identified by the City Engineer. Noise 1) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered significant as the project is consistent with the Development Code, General Industrial/industrial Park zoned area with no sensitive receptors in the area. 2) The proposed project is the development of one industrial building with loading areas. The development will remain consistent with surrounding land uses, zoned as General Industrial/Industrial Park. The project development would generate approximately 727 trips/day, creating no significant increase in noise caused by traffic in the area, and not predicted to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this impact is considered less than significant c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reported and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00321 to amend the street circulation within the Industrial Development District, Subareas 12 and 13, eliminating the extension of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue by amending Figures 17.30.080-0 and 17.30.080-N of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code as shown in Exhibit"A" and Exhibit"B"to this Ordinance. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. 2 yl Resolution No. 02-236 Page 7 of 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-N Revised 4/1/92 f PAISSIota - PARK pRIVE r o. Yi 1 d 5.ta. xabare 'a PROP05 E D Mspinn- iate s .. PORTION a - OF STREET TO [3E EL1M(NATEC -ptCiJI nON TAILs/ROUTES — 120'RAM' 0000 Pedestrian .i.—fieCieeks 8 ChOWAW 1w P-0LW-1* slayde ��. 88'or 1086 RO.W.. Regional {. Paric1 w3 fie GYS:r�h RAIL SERVICE F.4tas ♦-1 _ Bridge ��w- Spsclai Shwtacape/_ Lstdscapi g Proposed - Access Polls � 0 400r BOOT 1600' tnw efts shown may not be pimintly Owned nor Is the wretlM ales speclt.7tw depictim of as"Is an Note: Paroel Inas and lot conflW-4tlons igkatim of a gmj6Ctad fusee need that mey be ars shown as approximation only. -adjusted over has as the City develops, 'r ,( 4F�� 17.30-98 6j�'I Resolution No. 02-236 Page 8 of 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-0 CNCULATION �� LIl1lJ UL7[TU V - ,m R.O.W. R.,Ia.d 411le2. . - 100'R.O.W. W OR LESS R.O.W. a RAIL SERVICE W F h TTTTT EXISTING = il-1"1"1"1"1PROPOSED TRAIS/ROUTES 0000 PEDESTRIAN 00 9 0 a" ( S=(] REGIONAL MUhiSE �3�� 7th SPECIAL STREEFSCJWE/ LANDSCAPING POWER LINE/ UTLITY EASEMENT .r"'O� amts i CIA MELS l_J BRIDGE O 1�1 14 ACCESS POINTS PROPOSE D ® I PORTION PARK OF 5TRF.E 0 FIRE STATIONPARK N TO 13 F- ® pRtvE SHERIFF STATION ELIMINATE lO Note: parcel lines and lot configurations are r' shown as approximations only. I The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the location site specific. The depiction of a site is an Indication of a projected More need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. 0 400, 800' 1600, A5X,41 It 101 1, 17.30-101 6t2- 113