Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003/02/05 - Agenda Packet
Cl'TYC)F RAN C H'~G. ~C~M O N G A , > f--~: .~ ~ , ~ '" '10500 divic: Center. Drive Rancho Cucamonga, GA g1730 . Oily Office: (g0g) 477-2700 AGENDAS - CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. FEBRUARY 5, 2003 ARency, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular. City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 I All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Alexander ., Gutierrez Howdyshell__ Kurth , and Williams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: January 1, 2003 January 6, 2003 (Special Joint Meeting) January 15, 2003 January 16, 2003 (Special Meeting) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register January 8, 2003 through January 24, 2003, and Payroll ending January 24, 2003, for the total amount of $2,462,502.75. 3. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records 31 pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 03-015 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES .~ City Council Agenda r~ February 5, 2003 2 4. Approval of a Resolution urging the California Legislature to reject the :3§ Governor's proposed shift of local Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues and honor their 1998 commitment to keep cities and counties whole by "backfilling" VLF revenues. RESOLUTION NO. 03-016 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO REJECT THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED SHIFT OF LOCAL VLF REVENUES 5. Approval of a single source vendor selection, Delta Microlmaging, Inc., 39 for the purpose of converting microfilm to digital images and scanning Building and Safety~ Division plans in the amount not to exceed $50,000.00 from Acct. No. 1016301-5300. 6. Approval of a piggyback contract for the purchase of gasoline and 40 diesel fuel for Fleet Maintenance and the Police Department from Poma Distributing Company, Inc., of San Bernardino, in an annual amount not to exceed $169,000.00, funded from Funds 1001-317-5255 and 1001- 317-5256 and an annual amount not to exceed $143,000.00, funded from Fund 1001-701-5255. 7. Approval of annual agreement with NEC, BNS Company (CO 03-002) 41 to provide a Citywide Telephone Maintenance Agreement, piggybacking off of a competitively bid, fast open contracts utilization services (FOCUS) from the County of Merced, California, for the first annual amount of $65,000, plus an estimated 10% annual increase from Acct. No. 1001-205-5300, ending Fiscal Year 2007/2008. 8. Approval of a Resolution to accept control and maintenance over portions of Highland Avenue/19th Street between the City's west city 4:3 limits and Etiwanda Avenue, the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Marbella Drive, Alta Loma Drive from Revere Avenue to Haven Avenue, portions of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue, and portions of Summit Avenue and Cherry Avenue, to be relinquished by the State of California. City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 3 RESOLUTION NO. 03-017 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFQRNIA, APPROVING ACCEPTING CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER PORTIONS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/19TM STREET BETWEEN THE CITY'S WEST CITY LIMITS AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, THE INTERSECTION OF LEMON AVENUE AND MARBELLA DRIVE, ALTA LOMA DRIVE FROM REVERE AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, PORTIONS OF CHICKASAW ROAD AND EAST AVENUE, AND PORTIONS OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND CHERRY AVENUE, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND WAIVE THE STANDARD 90-DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENT 9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, 56 Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DRC2001-00772 (Tract 10246), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hillside Road, submitted by Prestige Homes, L.P., and release of previously-submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit accepted by the City Council on October 18, 1989, from J.C.R. Development Company Padnership. RESOLUTION NO. 03-018 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 18, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 03-019 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 4 10. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape 68 Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15732, located at the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Dorset Street, submitted by W.F. Construction, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 03-020 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 15732 RESOLUTION NO. 03-021 72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15732 11. Approval of Map for Parcel Map 15790, located on the east side of the 80 southern terminus of Hyssop Drive, east of the 1-15 Freeway, submitted by Erin Madison, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 03-022 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15790 12. Approval of a Cooperative Agreement between the San Bemardino County Transportation Authority/San Bernardino Associated 84 Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 03- 003) for the Carnelian Street Storm Drain Improvements, authorization to appropriate $3,200,000 from Fund Balance into Acct. No. 1112303- 5650/1450112-0 and authorization to receive the related reimbursement into Acct. No. 1112000-4745 (Intergovernmental Reimbursement). RESOLUTION NO. 03-023 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY/SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE CARNELIAN STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 5 13. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 88 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2001-00345, submitted by The Gardens, located at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 03-024 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00345 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETIGN FOR THE WORK 14. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13759, 91 located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, submitted by Forecast Group, L.P. 15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14207, located on Wilson Avenue, west of Beryl and south of Heritage Park, submitted by H & W Concordia R-28, LLC. 16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 95 15155, located on the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and White Oak Avenue, submitted by Master Development Corporation. 17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 15282, submitted by S & D Rancho Cucamonga California, LTD, a Texas Limited Partnership, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Aspen and Spruce Streets. RESOLUTION NO. 03-025 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15282 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15526, 100 located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View, submitted by Lewis Development Company. 19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15726, 102 located on the south side of Lemon Avenue at Phillips Way, submitted by DPCD Rancho 45/Ltd. 20. Approvals to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Playground Sand 104 Replacement at Various City Parks. City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 6 RESOLUTION NO. 03-026 '105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 21. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 441-000-470 in 106 the amount of $163,600.00 for the Wilson Avenue Landscape Improvements from San Sevaine Road to Cherry Avenue, Contract No. 01-048. 22. Approval to accept the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety 108 Lighting at the intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, Contract No. 02-032 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $24,245.00. RESOLUTION NO. 03-027 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE, CONTRACT NO, 02-032 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 23. Approval to accept the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, Contract 111 No. 02-033 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $34,333.08. RESOLUTION NO. 03-028 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AND LA ViNE/LA GRANDE STREETS, CONTRACT NO, 02-033 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 7 24. Approval to accept the Adult Sports Park and Parking Lot 114 Improvements Project as complete, authorize release of the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, authorize the City Engineer to release the Labor and Material Bond and release the 10% retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion by the County Recorder, approve the final contact amount of $202,460.00, less 10% retention, and approve change order no. 1 to International Pavement Solutions, to be funded from Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1209-190-0 ($10,000.00) and Acct. No. 1025001-5602 ($18,000.00) and authorize final payment after 30 days. RESOLUTION NO. 03-029 116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ADULT SPORTS PARK AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTRACT NO. 02-100) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion, 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts). ORDINANCE NO. 697 (second reading) 117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 8 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to 1) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street, and 2) change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low- Medium Residential for a 9-acre parcel, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related files: Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT15724 and SUBTT16157. ORDINANCE NO. 698 (second reading) 120 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002- 00533, A REQUEST TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE "D" BETWEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE "E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND CHURCH STREET; AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES 123 PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 02-023 RESOLUTION NO. 03-030 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 02-023 City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 9 2. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNITY 179 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (TO BE CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 19, 2003) RESOLUTION NO. 03-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01, ESTABLISHING TWO IMPROVEMENT AREA THEREIN, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN EACH IMPROVEMENT AREA, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION WITH EACH IMPROVEMENT AREA AND TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 03-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACiLiTIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 DECLARING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN EACH OF IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2 OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 AND ORDERING SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF EACH IMPROVEMENT AREA WITHIN THE DISTRICT PROPOSITIONS RELATING TO THE RESPECTIVE IMPROVEMENT AREA RESOLUTION NO. 03-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01, CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE FEBRUARY 5, 2003 SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ELECTIONS City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 I0 ORDINANCE NO. 699 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN EACH OF IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2 OF SUCH DISTRICT G.~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING 180 TO MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES ORDINANCE NO. 700 (first reading) 181 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 183 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING GRAFFITI PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL ORDINANCE NO. 701 (first reading) 185 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING GRAFFITI PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 11 H._:. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION'S 187 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOUR NEW APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOUNDATION I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE REGARDING MOUNTAIN LION INCIDENTS (Oral) 2. UPDATE ON TREE PRESERVATION 188 3. REPORT ON ILLEGAL DUMPING 195 4. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) 5. PRESENTATION OF A LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES "LOCAL 197 COALITION" PROGRAM AND CONSIDERATION OF A RELATED RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT/LABOR MISSION STATEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 03-034 '198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING AND ENDORSING THE PROPOSED MISSION STATEMENT OF A COALITION BETWEEN ORGANIZED LABOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS BEING CREATED AS PART OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES GRASSROOTS NETWORK J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items wilt not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. City Council Agenda I February 5, 2003 12 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 30, 2003, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. January 1,2003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq Due to the holiday, the meeting was cancelled. All items of business were scheduled to be discussed at the January 15, 2003 regular meeting. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * January 6, 2003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Joint Meetin.q A. CALL TO ORDER A special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City Council was held on Monday, January 6, 2003, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present were Agencymembers, Financing Authoritymembers and Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell (arrived at 6:08 p.m.), Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This item was moved ahead of the item of business listed on the agenda. No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM OF BUSINESS B1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS CONCERNING TAX ALLOCATION BOND Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the amount is optimistic or calculated. Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director, stated it is optimistic. She identified the use for some of the funding. Councilmember Kurth asked if there was any down side to doing this. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated no. Councilmember Howdyshell arrived at 6:08 p.m. Jack Lam, City Manager, summarized for Councilmember Howdyshell what had just been discussed prior to his arriving. Redevelopment Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Minutes January 6, 2003 Page 2 Mayor Alexander pointed out there was no one in the audience to speak on this item. RESOLUTION NO. RA03-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE BORROWING OF FUNDS FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE AGENCY'S RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTINS RELATING THERETO MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to approve Resolution No. RA03-001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. PFA03-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE LENDING OF FUNDS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO THE AGENCY'S RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTIONS RELATING THERETO MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. PFA03-001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 03-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INCURRENCE OF DEBT BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to approve Resolution No. 03-001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * January 15, 2003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special closed session on Wednesday, January 15, 2003, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM President Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a), TO DISCUSS EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V INTEX PROPERTIES INLAND EMPIRE, L.P., ET AL, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RCV 058755. -CITY C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS No one was present to comment on the closed session items. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:05 p.m. E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 5:48 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 15, 2003, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:16 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; James Frost, City Treasurer; James Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Melissa Morales, Sr. Administrative Secretary; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst I~1; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATiONS BI. Presentation to Congressman Joe Baca in appreciation of his leadership and friendship to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as our Congressman in the United States House of Representatives. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Congressman Baca thanking him for all he has done for Rancho Cucamonga. / Congressman Baca stated it has been a pleasure serving the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Johnny Rojo, Manager of Home Town Buffet in Rancho Cucamonga, for continuous support of community services programs. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Johnny Rojo and was assisted by Bill Pallotto, Youth Recreation Supervisor. B3. Presentation to the City Council and staff by Gwyn Frost on behalf of Head Start recognizing their support of the "Spark of Love and "Adopt-a-Family" volunteer programs during the holiday season. Gwyn Frost and other Head Start staff presented certificates to the City thanking them for their support. B4. Presentation to the Mayor and City Council of the first City "Bikeway and Trails" pocket folded maps. Pamela Stewart and others from the Trails Advisory Committee, made the presentation of the maps to the Council. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 3 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. John Lyons stated he wanted to talk about Rex Gutierrez because he had made a threat against him in the past. He stated this had an impact on his family and his neighbors. He felt the District Attorney should prosecute him. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he contacted Chaffey High School and they are not checking I.D.'s as Mr. Lyons had previously stated. He apologized to him and hoped that these things could be put behind the City and they could move on. C2. Gwyn Frost stated she wanted to talk about Sweeten Hall on San Bernardino Road and Hellman. She indicated it was the first school in Rancho Cucamonga and told about it. She felt there was a lot of beautiful history in this building. C3. Ron Byers, 9979 Manzanita, stated there is a mountain lion attacking animals in his neighborhood. He stated people are afraid to let their children out after dark. He stated it was confirmed that two dogs were attacked by the mountain lion and felt there are probably others. It had also killed a pet on Carrari. He felt something should be done before it kills a human being. He indicated he was told by Department of Fish and Game that they cannot do anything until it attacks a human being. He asked for the City Council to do something to help them. C4. Dave and Pam Gurillo wanted to voice their concern over the illegal dumping [~eing done on Etiwanda Avenue. He talked about an incident that had occurred over the Christmas holiday. He asked that the piles be removed. He talked about fining people that are leaving the debris and asked for increased Sheriff's Department patrol. He thanked Code Enforcement staff and also Captain Pete Ortiz for contacting him in the past. C5. Leslie Grimes felt politics is perception. She stated she questions every time she sees three Councilmembers together. She stated she wants to protect her neighborhood from the Colonies project. She stated she hopes that other cities care about their neighboring cities' concerns. She talked about the recent appointment of Dan Richard to the Fish and Game Commission, which made by Supervisor Paul Biane. She stated again this is perception. C6. Tom Marreck stated he lives in the mountain lion area and felt the Department of Fish and Game is not informing them proper~.y. He talked about the attacks on his neighbors pet and did not feel the Department of Fish and Game are helping them. He asked the Council to help them and take this seriously. Councilmember Gutierrez stated they would be happy to get information from the Department of Fish and Game and bring back a report at the next Council meeting. Mayor Alexander stated the Council will not wait until someone gets killed and will take action. C7. Jim Frost showed a picture of County Service Area 50. He felt Rex Whitney's employment date should be when he started with CSA 50. He continued to talk about former employees that started with the City, i.e., Harry Empey and Beverly Authelet and all of the work they did for the City. C8. Melanie Ingram stated she was glad the City already has a CERT program. She stated she encouraged further noise testing of the freeway. She did not feel Upland cares and would not want a sound wall to block a proposed development. She felt Caltrans should expand their noise testing. She added the Recall Rancho effort was alive and well. City Council Minutes January 15,2003 Page 4 Item I1 was discussed at this time. The minutes will remain in agenda order. D. CONSENT CALENDAR James Markman, City Attorney, there was a change in the law that effective January 1, 2003, anyone abstaining from a vote has to say why and leave the room while discussion is taking place and while the vote is taking place. He stated Agencymember Gutierrez will be abstaining from voting on warrants 191669 and 191899 to the Chambers of Commerce which is an advertiser in the newspaper he owned DI. Approval of Minutes: November 25, 2002 (Special Meeting) December 4, 2002 December 18, 2002 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register December 11, 2002, through January 7, 2003, and Payroll beginning December 6, 2002, through January 4, 2003, for the total amount of $7,622,381.91. D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of December 31, 2002. D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1446176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 03-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET" IN SAiD CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS DS. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Fisher Drive Street Improvements from East Avenue to Mulberry Street, to be funded from previously deposited developer payment placed in Trust Acct. No. 18820002314. RESOLUTION NO. 03-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval to accept a donation of two (2) electric carts from the GEMCar Company. D7. Approval of a Free Angels-Quakes Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho Epicenter Stadium on January 25, 2003. D8. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $6,000 to Acct. No. 11763035650/1448176-0 from the Measure I Fund balance to purchase Right-of-Way from County of San Bemardino, pay for County Flood Control District inspection fees and reproduction costs related to the Milliken Avenue/Wilson Avenue Extension ProJect, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/144/176-0. City Council Minutes Janua~ 15,2003 Page 5 D9. Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Kimley-Horn and Associates for the Design of Traffic Signal Interconnect System on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue in an amount of $15,000, and approval of an appropriation of $15,000 to Acct. No. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0 from the Transportation Fund balance. D10. Approval of a four (4) month Time Extension to Designate Cherry Lane as a Private Street, thereby exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code. RESOLUTION NO. 03-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) MONTHS TIME EXTENSION TO DESIGNATE CHERRY LANE A PRIVATE STREET, FOR COMPLIANCE OF THE CONDITIONS PER CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 02-215, DATED JULY 17, 2002 D11. Approval of a request to summarily vacate excess street right-of-way along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Avenue and extending south of the cul-de-sac terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, V-189 -APN: 229-263-68 and 229-321-21. RESOLUTION NO. 03-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVE., SOUTH OF SAN MARINO AVE. AND EXTENDING SOUTH OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE D12. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract SUBTT15724 - KB Home - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 1ct for the development of 78 single-family detached condominiums and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue'and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. Related file: Development Review DRC2001-00381. RESOLUTION NO. 03-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15724, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 9.05 ACRES OF LAND INTO 1 LOT FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, AND 1 LETTERED LOT FOR INGRESS/EGRESS, IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-831-32 City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 6 D13. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2001-00381 - KB Home - The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings on 9.05 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue -APN: 1077-831-32. Related file: Tentative Tract 15724 RESOLUTION NO. 03-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA V~STA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-831-32 D14. Approval for authorization to allow Verizon Wireless to perform on-site testing at the Epicenter for the purpose of reviewing the suitability of the property to install a wireless monopalm communication tower. D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District for DR 00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between LaGrande Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Northtown Housing Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 03-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-60 RESOLUTION NO. 03-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR DR 00-60 D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRCDR00-79, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 03-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRCDR00-79 City Council Minutes January15,2003 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 03-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRCDR00-79 D17 Approval to release Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities (future bus bay installation on 6 Street) for DR 00-31, ocated at the northwest corner of Mdl~ken Avenue and 6 Street, submitted by JPI Lifestyle Apartment Communities. RESOLUTION NO. 03-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES (FUTURE BUS BAY INSTALLATION ON 6TH STREET) FOR DR 00-31 D18. Approval to accept construction of the Church Street Right Turn Lane from Haven Avenue to 500' west, Contract No. 02-024 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $50,042.52. RESOLUTION NO. 03-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CHURCH STREET RIGHT TURN LANE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO 500' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 02-024, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D19. Approval to accept the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements at the BNSF and SCRRA Railroad Crossings, Contract No. 02-067, as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approval the final contract amount of $254,868.28. RESOLUTION NO. 03-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE BNSF AND SCRRA RAILROAD CROSSINGS, CONTRACT NO. 02- 067, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of the warrants as identified above. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Williams not present for vote). Councilmember Williams returned at 10:15 p·m. Agencymember Gutierrez left the room for the next vote. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve warrants 191669 and 191899. Motion carried 4-0-0-1 (Gutierrez abstained). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORO~NANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 695. ORDINANCE NO. 695 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 695. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts). Staff report presented by Allen Warren, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 697. ORDINANCE NO. 697 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Kurth to waive full reading and set second reading of ordinance No. 697 for the February 5, 2003 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00535 - KB H©ME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATIGN - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to 1 ) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street, and 2) change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential for a 9-acre parcel, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related files: Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT15724 and SUBTT16157. Staff report presented by Debra Meier, Contract Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Jerry Cockoroft, KB Homes, stated they have worked with staff and agree with all of the findings associated with this project. He felt the project is consistent with the uses around it. Chris Kriner, Lewis Operating Corporation, congratulated staff and felt this was a good project. Councilmember Kurth inquired if the modification of the trail changed the aesthetics of the project. Mr. Kriner stated there will be more landscape installed due to the moving of the trail. Dave Stuckey, 11098 Clover Dale Court, did not feel the developer should be able to change a planned community whenever they want to. He did not agree with this plan and felt all KB Homes wants to do is make a greater profit margin. He asked that the Council make a decision that was fair to everyone. Mayor Alexander asked if there are alley systems. Debra Meier, Contract Planner, stated in the true sense there would not be. She stated they are private streets and showed a plan and explained how it would be laid out. She also referred to the staff report that includes a list of the amenities. Councilmember Williams asked the selling price of these homes. Jerry Cockoroft, KB Homes, stated between $200,000 and $250,000. He stated the homeowner's association fee is approximately $100 per month. Councilmember Gutierrez thought "0" lot line was something the Planning Commission was against. Mayor Alexander commented on the "0" lot line design and felt it was a terrible idea. He didn't know why the Planning Commission approved this. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated Terra Vista is a planned community that has a whole wide range of housing types. He stated it is defined in this plan to provide for "0" lot line development to be used. He stated they had left the market place for awhile, but now are starting to come back. He felt the association can help with some of the issues pertaining to the "0" lot line. Mr. Cockoroft stated the homeowner's association will assist with these issues that they are very involved with these matters. He stated that Euclid Management will be doing this for this project. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 10 Councilmember Gutierrez stated Terra Vista is a very unique development. He stated he sympathizes with the people that like more of a single family development. He stated he was surprised about the "0" lot line. Mayor Alexander inquired about the availability of parking. Brad Builer, City Planner, stated typically in a Terra Vista project, they exceed the City's codes in garage space and extra parking for visitors as well. Mr. Stuckey felt less than 50% of people use their garage for storing vehicles. Councilmember Williams felt the homeowner's association will help with the parking situation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 698. ORDINANCE NO. 698 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533, A REQUEST TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE D BETWEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND CHURCH STREET; AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05- ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 698 for the February 5, 2003 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. REPORT ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY NOISE City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 11 Staff report was presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. He stated Caltrans has agreed to another noise study along the freeway corridor. He stated staff will work with them to figure out the extend of the problem. He stated it will start around the first of February and the City should have results around the first of April. He stated it would include the north side of the freeway between Hermosa west of Beryl, Lemon east of Haven and Etiwanda to the 115 Freeway. On the south side of the freeway, it would include Milliken to Rochester. He stated all comments will be taken into consideration when completing this study. He stated Caltrans will be assisting with this study. He suggested the report be brought back to the Route 30 Task Force once it is completed and that once they have reviewed it, it come back to the Council at that time. Mayor Alexander stated he would open this item up for discussion at both the Route 30 Task Force meeting and the City Council meeting. Councilmember Williams suggested that a workshop be set to discuss this and felt maps should be displayed of the freeway corridor. Councilmember Howdyshell asked when will there be some mitigation if the results are what we think they will be. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it depends on the mitigation. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: David Burchfield, 9801 Caldera, stated the area of concern is Highland along Hermosa to Beryl. He suggested the linear park issue be pushed forward. He felt segment 3 should have a sound wall. He gave a power point presentation to explain his position. Ray and Terri Harton, 6573 Vianza, stated she is concerned about her kids' safety at the school bus stop. She felt a sound wall will help the safety of the children from those coming off of the freeway. Paul Capitelli, Day Creek and Etiwanda area, stated he has a petition he would like to submit to the City Engineer. He stated there is no sound wall in his area and asked that this be studied. He asked for the Council to help them. Sandra Walked, Antler Peak Coud - north, side of the freeway, stated they have a sound wall but that it is not helping. She stated there are two walls in this area and wonders who will clean the weeds around them. She stated there are two doors for the sound wall and wonders why they are there. She stated the freeway keeps getting louder and louder as more people travel it. George Simmons, Carriage Estates, stated there is debris that is not getting cleaned up along the Day Creek on and off ramp. He did not feel people should have to look at the freeway, see the lights or hear the noise. A man, did not give his name, stated from Beryl to Hellman there is a five foot fence and that he is concerned about the safety of the kids. Thomas Wilson, Citation Homes, felt the freeway was dangerous from Woodruff to Day Creek. He felt something should be done about this. He stated he would like truck traffic restricted north of Foothill. Joel Ferris, 6418 Cambridge, stated he liked the idea of a workshop. He stated he is concerned about Caltrans doing anything on the study. He suggested maybe the City should do its on study. He wondered why one side of the freeway has a sound wall and the other side does not. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 12 Mayor Alexander stated all of these questions will be answered. Mr. Ferris felt the workshop should occur before the study stads. Paul Jacobson, 6542 Autumn Glenn, stated his neighbors want the sound wall up on the freeway where it belongs. He felt the people have waited long enough. Joe Aguilar, 11651 Brandisi Court, felt the Council should make the commitment to get the money in place to have the sound walls built. Mark Bridgeford, 6659 Fresno - south side of the freeway near 19th Street, stated they have a sound wall and that they still hear the freeway noise. He stated they would like to have the noise checked out even though they already have a sound wall. George Gastro, 6525 DeAnza Place, stated he is not sleeping at night because of the freeway noise. He felt he could not sell his house because of the freeway. He stated he is not getting any assistance from the builder on problems he is having with this house. Bob Emery, 9220 Highland, stated all he has now is a chain link fence stating the freeway is still noisy and dirty in his area. Dora Mangold, 9170 Highland, stated she would like the City to help get the sound wall built. She stated they do not want to wait until April and wanted it done now. John Carlton, 9235 Cottonwood - between Hellman and Beryl, stated the freeway noise is deafening. He suggested that all of the people each pay $30/foot for a wall. He stated they need something done. Steve Desephano, 10838 Sonora, stated he went out and replaced all of his windows, but that he still hears the freeway noise loud and clear. He stated he is now ready to put a waterfall in his yard to get rid of the freeway noise. Sara Chisum, 6432 Klusman, stated even though the freeway helps her commute, she hates the noise. Kenny Harper, 10979 Marbella - east of Haven, north of the freeway, stated the noise is very bad on his street and in his area. He stated he wants to sell his home because of this problem. He hoped that the City and Caltrans will help them. Royce Hacker, 9210 Old Ranch Road, asked why the access gates at the top of the freeway can't stay locked. He stated the wind blows them open. Leslie Grimes stated some of her neighbors have a dirt berm and that it is not helping. She stated she is afraid all of the dirt might get washed away if it rains very much. She felt the storm drain in her area allows the noise to travel upward. She hopes that the Campus area will also be looked at. She felt the City should keep the 2 ½ acres instead of letting Upland have it in case we need to create a buffer. Shawn Henderson, 11633 Traviso, felt the freeway has no design element. Brenda Lewsky, between Rochester and Milliken, stated the longer the freeway is open the more noise it will create. She stated truckers are honking their horns at 3:00 a.m. and that this is disturbing them. She stated she cannot open her windows for fresh air and will have to run her air conditioning system more this summer and that will be costly to her. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 13 Steven Keel, Caltrans Rep, stated they have heard a lot of issues tonight and are glad to hear people's views. He stated they would like to show people how they do sound readings through a workshop so the people are informed. He stated they will look into the unlocked access gate issue. He stated they are currently designing the landscaping and that it will be in place in a couple of years. He stated they want to educate people and assist the City. Councilmember Kurth asked if there is anything that can be done to assist people now instead of making them wait. He stated he can't imagine hew this is for some of these people. He hoped the results of the study could be done sooner than April. Mayor Alexander suggested the workshop be done through the Route 30 Task Force and that this could be televised on Channel 3 so everyone could see it. He felt the construction problems brought up should be looked at by the City. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he put this on the agenda because there are so many people impacted. He felt this Council wants to do something about this. He felt this was a beginning. He wanted to try to help the quality of life for everyone. Brad Guth, 6524 Autumn Glenn, felt sound studies are great, but wanted to have the Council come to his home to hear the noise. He stated the freeway is very loud and that he can't enjoy his patio. Tony Luca stated sometimes you can't take the sound readings if there is wind er rain and that this might delay things. Ceuncilmember Williams asked if the City can check to see what insulation and windows are being put in the homes and if these are really acceptable. She felt possibly something better should be required to be put in. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Building Official would be the one to address these issues and that he would work with him to be sure the proper matffrials are being installed in the new homes. Councilrnember Williams felt possibly the City should require something better than what is currently approved for installation in the new homes. A recess was taken at 10:02 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 10:14 p.m. with all Councilmembers present (Williams returned at 10:15 p.m.) .12. CONSIDERATION OF BATTERY BACK-UP POWER AT CITY TRAFFIC SIGNALS Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez felt there should be something in the Grapevine telling people what they should do if a signal light goes out. Councilmember Williams suggested something go on Channel 3 also so that people are aware what to do if there is a flashing light. Councilmember Kudh asked if there was anything else the City can do to reduce the liability. James Markman, City Attorney, felt the City was already taking the right approach. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 14 ACTION: Report received and filed. 13. PRESENTATION AND REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FOR THE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND MEASURE ON THE MARCH 2003 BALLOT (Oral) A power point presentation was given by Francisco Oaxaca. Mayor Alexander felt this presentation should be shown on television several times. Councilmember Williams asked what the cost would be to each resident. Mr. Oaxaca stated it is $108 per year. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Kurth to support the measure for Central School District. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 14. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) Councilmember Williams stated last Tuesday she, Councilmember Howdyshell and City Manager Jack Lam met with Assemblyman Dutton and Senator Brulte asking them to fight for City's to keep their revenues. She continued to talk about the possible revenues the State could take away from cities. She stated she would like a way to get information out to the citizens about this and to discuss it at the next meeting. 15. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE ACTION: Report. received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Williams brought up the mountain lion problem that a report should come back for the next meeting. J2. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if Planning Department could give a repod on the City's tree policy and how they are approved and preserved. J3. Councilmember Williams stated a report should come back on the illegal dumping on Etiwanda. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes January 15, 2003 Page 15 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * January 16, 2003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, January 16, 2003 in the Training Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 9:45 by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Staff present were: Jack Lam, City Manager and Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager. B COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. C ITEM OF BUSINESS C1. ANNUAL TEAM BUILDING/GOALS MAINTENANCE WORKSHOP The City Council met for the annual team building/goals maintenance workshop. (A copy is on file in the City Clerk's office.) The meeting recessed at 11:30 a.m. and reconvened at 2:00 p.m. D. ADJOURNMENT The workshop adjourned at 4:50 p.m. and would be continued to a future date to complete the workshop. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * .~T H E C: I T Y 0 F I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: February 4, 2003 TO: Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember FROM: Pamela S. Easter, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Review of Warrants for February 5, 2003 Council Meeting I wanted to confirm our telephone conversation on Monday, February 3 regarding the Warrant Register for the upcoming February 5 Council meeting. After reviewing the warrants that will be on the Warrant Register with the list of vendors that you provided, there do not appear to be any warrants from which you need to abstain at this meeting. This has been reviewed with the City Attorney. If I can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Cc: Debbie Adams, City Clerk Jack Lam, City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Tamara Layne, Finance Officer Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor T H E C I T Y 0 F ~ANCIiO C ~CAMON CA Memorandum DATE: January 30, 2003 TO: ~ Debbie Adams, City Clerk ~ CC: Jack Lam, City Manager Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ SUBJECT: Summary of Warrants Issued to Vendors Representing Possible Conflict of Interest for Councilmember Gutierrez - Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2003 Attached for your reference is a summary of warrants by entity that were issued to vendors representing a possible conflict of interest for Councilmember Gutierrez due to his personal business dealings with them. These warrants are included in the Consent Calendar section of each entity's agenda. If you have any questions regarding the attached, please give me a call at extension 2430. Thank you. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY $, 2003 VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT Arrowhead Credit Union 192605 1/15/2003 $1,714.52 So Calif Edison 192837 1/15/2003 $22,376.20 Southern California Edison 192838 1/15/2003 $102,802.84 Southern Cai Edison 192541 1/8/2003 $9,379.03 Southern Cai Edison 192544 1/8/2003 $110,835.00 Southern Cai Edison 192842 1/15/2003 $6,891.26 Southern Cai Edison 193060 1/22/2003 $12,993.73 Stark, Ron* 193062 1/22/2003 $286.14 *Overpayment of candidate filing fees for November 5, 2002 election. kfinance~accounts payable~council warrant list, xls CITY-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY S, 2003 VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT NONE i:V~nance~accounts payable~council warrant list. xls F~ DA-1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192332 1/8/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,461.72 AP - 00192333 1/8/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 188.35 AP - 00192333 1/8/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 99.50 AP - 00192334 1/8/2003 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00192335 1/8/2003 ABLETRONICS 40.00 AP - 00192335 1/8/2003 ABLETRONICS 132.32 AP - 00192335 1/8/2003 ABLETRONICS 225.38 AP - 00192335 1/8/2003 ABLETRONICS 7.56 AP - 00192336 1/8/2003 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT INC 431.43 AP - 00192337 1/8/2003 ACCIDENT RESEARCH AND BIOMECHANICS IN 1,582.00 AP - 00192338 I/8/2003 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 297.51 AP - 00192339 1/8/2003 ADVANCED ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS 1,500.00 AP - 00192340 1/8/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 4,125.00 AP - 00192340 1/8/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 660.00 AP - 00192342 1/8/2003 AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTER LLC 1,000.00 AP - 00192344 1/8/2003 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 21.00 AP - 00192345 1/8/2003 ALWAYS BALLOONS 100.00 AP - 00192346 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 248.84 AP - 00192346 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 224.84 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 60.81 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 17.10 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 48.90 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 25.95 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 27.04 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 40.33 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 40.93 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 42.54 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT -18.33 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 71.83 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 5.99 AP - 00192347 1/8/2003 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 23.80 AP - 00192348 1/8/2003 AMERICAN PIPE AND SUPPLY 104.06 AP ~ 00192348 1/8/2003 AMERICAN PIPE AND SUPPLY 40.96 AP - 00192349 1/8/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00192349 1/8/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP - 00192349 1/8/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 535.00 AP - 00192350 1/8/2003 ARBOR NURSERY INC 441.78 AP - 00192351 1/8/2003 ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST 24.95 AP - 00192352 1/8/2003 ASH MUSIC STORES, SAM 134.09 AP - 00192354 1/8/2003 AT AND T 36.67 AP - 00192355 1/8/2003 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.58 AP - 00192356 1/8/2003 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 3,089.49 AP - 00192357 1/8/2003 AUTO SPECIALISTS 140.00 AP - 00192358 1/8/2003 AZZARA'S GOURMET CATERING 302.02 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 47.08 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 185.00 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 19.40 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 158.63 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 0.68 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 156.58 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 20.97 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 57.50 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 47.08 AP - 00192359 1/8/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 185.00 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192360 1/8/2003 BARRETT DC, MARK R 80.00 AP - 00192361 1/8/2003 BARSTOOLS ETC 775.00 AP - 00192362 1/8/2003 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 21.09 AP - 00192364 1/8/2003 BOGDANOFF, MICHAEL 100.00 AP - 00192365 1/8/2003 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 611.00 AP - 00192366 1/8/2003 BUSINESS WEEK 29.97 AP - 00192368 1/8/2003 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38 AP - 00192369 1/8/2003 CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 550.00 AP - 00192370 1/8/2003 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 105.00 AP - 00192371 1/8/2003 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 14.25 AP - 00192372 1/8/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 50.78 AP - 00192372 1/8/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 55.65 AP - 00192372 1/8/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 8.35 AP - 00192373 1/8/2003 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 1,605.27 AP - 00192373 1/8/2003 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 541.86 AP - 00192376 1/8/2003 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00192377 1/8/2003 COAST RECREATION INC 417.13 AP - 00192379 1/8/2003 CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES INC 6,500.00 AP - 00192380 1/8/2003 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 40.00 AP - 00192380 1/8/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP - 00192380 1/8/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00 AP - 00192380 I/8/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00 AP - 00192380 1/8/2003 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 10.00 AP - 00192381 1/8/2003 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES 1,018.20 AP - 00192382 1/8/2003 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 73.59 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 26.84 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 350.21 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 18.40 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 68.20 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 186.44 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 613.22 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 196.61 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 300.77 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 66.96 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.33 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.62 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 117.77 AP ~ 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.80 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 175.47 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 245.33 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 478.05 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 252.75 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 268.17 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 993.01 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 107.47 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 236.24 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,906.12 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 48.63 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.42 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 46.57 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.42 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 121.91 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.41 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 176.50 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layom Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 64.08 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 43.48 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 101.98 AP ~ 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 55.84 AP - 00192384 · 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 34.21 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 38.47 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 21.99 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST ' 23.02 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 25.08 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.18 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 194.01 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 66.96 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 25.08 AP - 00192384 1/8/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 66.14 AP - 00192385 1/8/2003 CYBERTEK COLLEGE 509.00 AP - 00192385 1/8/2003 CYBERTEK COLLEGE 186.00 AP - 00192386 1/8/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 192.88 AP - 00192387 1/8/2003 DALY, JASON 40.47 AP - 00192388 1/8/2003 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00192389 1/8/2003 DELTA DENTAL 31,036.50 AP - 00192390 1/8/2003 DEMCO [NC 65.05 AP - 00192390 1/8/2003 DEMCO INC 71.48 AP - 00192391 1/8/2003 DFM ASSOCIATES 42.90 AP - 00192392 1/8/2003 DOSS TENNIS COURTS 2,860.00 AP - 00192394 1/8/2003 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 188.57 AP - 00192394 1/8/2003 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 112.50 AP - 00192396 1/8/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 628.89 AP - 00192396 1/8/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 400.08 AP - 00192397 1/8/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 2,514.84 AP - 00192398 1/8/2003 ESP[NO'S COP SHOP INC 179.05 AP - 00192398 1/8/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 112.50 AP - 00192398 1/8/2003 ESP[NO'S COP SHOP INC 179.05 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EW[NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 38.27 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 317.30 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 153.11 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2.06 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EW[NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 24.46 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 450.78 AP - 00192399 1/8/2003 EW12qG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 145.00 AP - 00192400 1/8/2003 EWING, THOMAS E 140.00 AP - 00192401 1/8/2003 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 1,111.44 AP - 00192403 1/8/2003 FIELDS, JUSTIN 173.00 AP - 00192404 1/8/2003 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 153.00 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 542.80 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 668.25 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 120.00 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 633.49 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,320.00 AP - 00192405 1/8/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 300.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192407 1/8/2003 FIRE SPRINKER SYSTEMS 97.50 AP - 00192408 1/8/2003 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 79.74 AP - 00192409 1/8/2003 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00 AP - 00192412 1/8/2003 GALE GROUP,THE 148.44 AP - 00192412 1/8/2003 GALE GROUP,THE 53.16 AP - 00192413 1/8/2003 GIANT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER 125.12 AP - 00192414 1/8/2003 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 AP - 00192415 1/8/2003 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATI 705.00 AP - 00192416 1/8/2003 GRAINGER, WW 333.23 AP - 00192417 1/8/2003 GRALNIK, GREGORY 73.00 AP - 00192418 1/8/2003 GRANDMA SUSIE CLOWN 75.00 AP - 00192419 1/8/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 83.55 AP - 00192420 1/8/2003 HAINES AND COMPANY INC 270.60 AP - 00192421 1/8/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 2,100.00 AP - 00192422 1/8/2003 HOCKWALD, CLARK 70.00 AP - 00192423 1/8/2003 HOLGUIN, MICHAEL 73.00 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 212.27 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 289.83 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 290.65 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 45.00 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 45.00 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 761.26 AP - 00192424 1/8/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 56.86 AP - 00192427 1/8/2003 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP - 00192429 1/8/2003 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 550.4t AP - 00192430 1/8/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 255.31 AP - 00192432 1/8/2003 IIMC 495.00 AP - 00192433 1/8/2003 INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH ADVERTISINO 400.41 AP - 00192435 1/8/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 761.36 AP - 00192435 1/8/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 854.58 AP - 00192436 1/8/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.10 AP - 00192437 1/8/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 57.29 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH 1,263.20 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH 71.12 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH -1,900.71 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH '1,900.71 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH -686.25 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH -71.12 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 1NTELLI TECH 196.90 AP - 00192439 1/8/2003 INTELLI TECH 323.25 AP - 00192440 1/8/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 361.72 AP - 00192440 1/8/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 112.49 AP - 00192440 1/8/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 155.05 AP - 00192440 1/8/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 432.85 AP - 00192441 1/8/2003 JCC DEVELOPMENT 2,500.00 AP 00192442 1/8/2003 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,250.00 AP 00192443 1/8/2003 JUAREZ, GUS R 73.00 AP 00192444 1/8/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1NC 2,148.13 AP 00192445 1/8/2003 KELLY, KRISTY 80.64 AP 00192447 1/8/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 580.00 AP 00192448 1/8/2003 LAM, JACK 26.60 AP 00192449 1/8/2003 LANCE SOLLAND LUNGHARD 3,662.03 AP - 00192450 1/8/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 106.16 AP - 00192450 1/8/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 56.54 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192451 1/8/2003 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 175.00 AP - 00192452 1/8/2003 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 168.00 AP - 00192453 1/8/2003 LEON, LUIS 20.00 AP - 00192455 1/8/2003 L1FESTLYE LANDSCAPES 500.00 AP - 00192456 1/8/2003 LIL STITCH 263.45 AP - 00192458 1/8/2003 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 233.04 AP - 00192459 1/8/2003 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 198.02 AP - 00192460 1/8/2003 MAHMOND, A. ALY 146.00 AP - 00192461 1/8/2003 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 73.00 AP - 00192462 1/8/2003 MARDINI, GEORGE 46.00 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 478.00 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,349.83 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 241.84 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MAiL1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,095.65 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06 AP - 00192463 1/8/2003 MARiPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 125.94 AP - 00192464 1/8/2003 MARK CHRIS 1NC 27.93 AP - 00192465 1/8/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00192465 1/8/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00192465 I/8/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00192466 1/8/2003 MATT'S HARDWARE 20.10 AP - 00192467 1/8/2003 MCGOOK1N, KELLI 500.00 AP - 00192468 1/8/2003 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 518.99 AP - 00192468 1/8/2003 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 219.19 AP - 00192468 1/8/2003 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 16.06 AP - 00192468 1/8/2003 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 134.10 AP - 00192469 1/8/2003 MCSI 8,822.60 AP - 00192471 1/8/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 133.94 AP - 00192471 1/8/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 73.96 AP - 00192472 1/8/2003 MIGLORiNI, ERNIE 54.00 AP - 00192473 1/8/2003 MMASC 50.00 AP - 00192474 1/8/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46 AP - 00192474 1/8/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 130.38 AP - 00192475 1/8/2003 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 144.68 AP - 00192476 1/8/2003 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 13.49 AP - 00192476 1/8/2003 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 76.49 AP - 00192477 1/8/2003 MR TS 24HR TOWING 65.00 AP - 00192477 1/8/2003 MR TS 24HR TOWING 65.00 AP - 00192478 1/8/2003 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP - 00192479 1/8/2003 MULLIN, SHEPPARD 203.83 AP - 00192480 1/8/2003 MYERS, JEFF 249.67 AP - 00192480 1/8/2003 MYERS, JEFF 27.03 AP - 00192480 1/8/2003 MYERS, JEFF 34.72 AP - 00192481 1/8/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 51.83 AP - 00192481 1/8/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 46.95 AP 00192481 1/8/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 84.05 AP 00192481 1/8/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 82.04 AP 00192482 1/8/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP 00192482 1/8/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP 00192482 1/8/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP 00192482 1/8/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP - 00192483 1/8/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 7,447.69 AP - 00192484 1/8/2003 NATIONS RENT 56.57 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK2AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192484 1/8/2003 NATIONS RENT 297.58 AP - 00192484 1/8/2003 NATIONS RENT 100.59 AP - 00192485 1/8/2003 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 13,937.40 AP - 00192486 1/8/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00192486 1/8/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00192487 1/8/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 205.00 AP - 00192488 1/8/2003 NIKPOUR, SHIRIN 54.00 AP - 00192489 1/8/2003 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 588.75 AP - 00192489 1/8/2003 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 105.25 AP - 00192489 1/8/2003 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO -89.88 AP - 00192490 1/8/2003 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 100.00 AP - 00192491 1/8/2003 OCLC INC 56.78 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 20.71 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.08 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 38.46 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 468.71 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.83 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 5.24 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 30.04 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 83.29 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 12.16 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 22.85 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 230.70 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 58.21 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 299.17 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 15.97 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 197.75 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.37 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 59.89 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 10.60 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 136.79 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 33.62 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 966.52 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 23.54 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 4.64 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 5.18 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 19.48 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 280.13 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 26.16 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 15.83 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 51.87 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 103.69 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -8.59 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 23.62 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.86 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 8.09 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 110.83 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 40.24 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 25.92 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 115.16 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 24.49 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 29.11 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 23.61 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 6.63 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 01/28/20u Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 0~9:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 66.78 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT ~10.13 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 1.87 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 19.02 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.66 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 14.03 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 36.13 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 338.83 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 57.54 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -37.06 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -28.44 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 74.73 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 140.06 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 393.91 AP - 00192493 1/8/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 27.14 AP - 00192494 1/8/2003 OMNITRANS 46.50 AP - 00192495 1/8/2003 OPEN APPS 720.00 AP - 00192496 1/8/2003 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE [NC 6,486.94 AP - 00192498 1/8/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION [NC -59.15 AP - 00192498 1/8/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 32.82 AP - 00192498 1/8/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 115.86 AP - 00192498 1/8/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 403.34 AP - 00192499 1/8/2003 PAPER DIRECT [NC 139.90 AP - 00192500 1/8/2003 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 282.26 AP - 00192502 1/8/2003 PEREZ, CARLOS 1,876.04 AP - 00192503 1/8/2003 PEREZ, HECTOR 27.00 AP - 00192504 1/8/2003 PETERMAN LUMBER 98.32 AP - 00192504 1/8/2003 PETERMAN LUMBER 226.01 AP - 00192504 1/8/2003 PETERMAN LUMBER 435.09 AP - 00192504 1/8/2003 PETERMAN LUMBER 107.75 AP - 00192505 1/8/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 362.50 AP - 00192505 I/8/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE [NC 1,800.00 AP - 00192505 1/8/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE [NC 786.18 AP - 00192505 1/8/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE [NC 60.00 AP - 00192505 1/8/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 377.77 AP - 00192506 1/8/2003 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 414.02 AP - 00192507 1/8/2003 PINCOTT, JOHN 368.00 AP - 00192508 1/8/2003 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 3,811.31 AP - 00192509 1/8/2003 PJ BODY SHOP 1,437.27 AP - 00192510 1/8/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,430.69 AP - 00192510 1/8/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 6,930.06 AP - 00192511 1/8/2003 POMONA [NLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR* 783.00 AP - 00192513 1/8/2003 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 125.00 AP - 00192514 1/8/2003 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 112.93 AP - 00192515 1/8/2003 PROSHOT PRODUCTS 27.42 AP - 00192516 1/8/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVE1LALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00192516 1/8/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00192518 1/8/2003 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 213.88 AP - 00192519 1/8/2003 RCPFA 4,145.41 AP - 00192520 1/8/2003 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 6.42 AP - 00192521 1/8/2003 REDINGER, TOM 40.00 ~ AP - 00192522 1/8/2003 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 260.00 AP - 00192523 l/8/2003 RICHARD AVENT 1,000.00 AP - 00192524 1/8/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 146.24 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192524 1/8/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 84.05 AP - 00192525 1/8/2003 RMA GROUP 427.00 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 716.10 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 919.00 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 231.20 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES 1NC 272.00 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00 AP - 00192526 1/8/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 716.10 AP - 00192527 1/8/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,065.00 AP - 00192529 1/8/2003 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 35.00 AP - 00192530 1/8/2003 SAN BERNARD1NO, COUNTY OF 96.35 AP - 00192531 1/8/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 566.77 AP - 00192531 1/8/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 624.95 AP - 00192532 1/8/2003 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 21.54 AP - 00192532 1/8/2003 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 21.90 AP - 00192533 1/8/2003 SCHOLASTIC INC 498.25 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 495.00 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 295.00 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 1,018.24 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 336.26 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 395.00 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 495.00 AP - 00192534 1/8/2003 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 395.00 AP - 00192536 1/8/2003 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,276.19 AP - 00192537 1/8/2003 SIR SPEEDY 207.46 AP - 00192541 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,379.03 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.11 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.31 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 210.20 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.67 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.15 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.83 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.51 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.72 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.78 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.37 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.32 AP -'00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.63 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.48 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.41 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.68 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.14 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.42 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 0~.~9:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,991.63 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.48 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.49 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.56 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.25 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 260.89 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.70 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 232.21 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.53 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.51 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 226.93 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.85 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.35 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,228.74 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58,571.29 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,839.89 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 741.00 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29,294.48 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,529.68 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,643.21 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.85 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.19 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 562.32 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 212.74 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 203.99 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.02 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.54 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.98 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.28 AP ~ 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.67 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.87 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 276.03 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.60 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.85 AP - 00192544 t/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.67 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 222.84 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.04 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.49 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.79 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.18 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.01 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.39 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t3.53 AP - 00192544 1/8/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.78 AP - 00192546 1/8/2003 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 499.27 AP - 00192546 1/8/2003 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 189.39 AP - 00192547 1/8/2003 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 331.11 AP - 00192549 1/8/2003 STEPHEN COOPERAGE, B 90.51 AP - 00192550 1/8/2003 STEVES TOWING 112.50 AP - 00192551 1/8/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 975.00 AP - 00192551 1/8/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 125.00 AP - 00192551 1/8/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH 1NC 125.00 AP - 00192551 1/8/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH 1NC 125.00 AP - 00192552 1/8/2003 TANNER, O C 5,174.26 AP - 00192553 1/8/2003 TARGET 66.78 AP ~ 00192554 1/8/2003 THE GARDENS LLC 1,000.00 AP - 00192555 1/8/2003 TOBIN, RENEE 17.32 AP - 00192557 1/8/2003 TRUJILLO, ROSEANN 41.00 AP - 00192558 1/8/2003 TUASON, LOLITA 17.00 AP - 00192559 1/8/2003 U S ENVIRO NET SERVICES 5,967.00 AP - 00192560 1/8/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,737.00 AP - 00192560 1/8/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 480.00 AP - 00192560 1/8/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 1,288.00 AP - 00192560 1/8/2003 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 140.00 AP - 00192561 1/8/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00192561 1/8/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 132.73 AP - 00192561 1/8/2003 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 175.73 AP - 00192561 1/8/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00192561 1/8/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 566.09 AP ~ 00192561 1/8/2003 LrNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00192562 1/8/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR PJ 48,057.54 AP - 00192563 1/8/2003 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 500.00 AP - 00192564 1/8/2003 UNITED TRAFFIC 1,777.88 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.10 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 35.78 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 28.67 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.10 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 34.54 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.10 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.10 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 36.98 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 133.91 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 32.17 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 28.83 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.71 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 31.71 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 27.10 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 22.64 AP - 00192565 1/8/2003 VERIZON 22.31 AP - 00192566 1/8/2003 VISTA PAINT 248.77 AP - 00192567 1/8/2003 VULCAN CALMAT ASPHALT 661.09 AP - 00192568 1/8/2003 WAA 200.00 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REGPORTILAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192569 1/8/2003 WALKER, KENNETH A 54.00 AP - 00192570 1/8/2003 WATERS, MARTHA 25.92 AP - 00192571 1/8/2003 WEST GROUP 120.68 AP - 00192572 1/8/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP - 00192573 1/8/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 254.40 AP - 00192574 1/8/2003 YEE, LARRY 151.00 AP - 00192575 1/8/2003 YOUNAN, MEDHAT 73.00 AP - 00192576 1/8/2003 ZWISSLER, JAMES 184.00 AP - 00192577 1/9/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,024.00 AP - 00192578 1/9/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 4,019.25 AP - 00192578 1/9/2003 US GUARDS CO 1NC 2,173.50 AP - 00192578 1/9/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 5,422.25 AP - 00192578 1/9/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 1,932.00 AP - 00192579 1/9/2003 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 648.00 AP - 00192580 1/9/2003 LOPEZ, CLARA 700.00 AP - 00192581 1/9/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 90.40 AP - 00192581 1/9/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 842.71 AP - 00192581 1/9/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 122.76 AP - 00192582 1/9/2003 MYERS TIRE 249.67 AP - 00192583 1/9/2003 MYERS, JEFF 27.03 AP - 00192583 1/9/2003 MYERS, JEFF 34.72 AP - 00192584 1/15/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 432.19 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 679.95 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 2,482.26 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.58 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.46 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 76.89 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 29.48 AP- 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 447.92 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 968.08 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 535.12 AP- 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.25 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 334.83 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 47.40 AP - 00192586 1/15/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.80 AP - 00192587 1/15/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 23.47 AP - 00192587 1/15/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO ][NC -48.49 AP - 00192587 1/15/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 85.63 AP-00192588 1/15/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 25.32' AP- 00192588 1/15/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,155.96 AP-00192589 1/15/2003 ABLAC 294.06 AP- 00192590 1/15/2003 ABLETRONICS 90.00 AP- 00192591 1/15/2003 ACT GIS INC 10,617.06 AP- 00192593 1/15/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 256.00 AP-00192593 1/15/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,024.00 AP- 00192595 1/15/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,980.00 AP - 00192595 1/15/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,485.00 AP- 00192597 1/15/2003 ALLAWAY, SEAN 62.00 AP- 00192598 1/15/2003 ALPERTS PRINTING 1,177.83 AP- 00192599 1/15/2003 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 195.00 AP- 00192600 1/15/2003 AMERICAN PIPE AND SUPPLY 1,077.06 AP- 00192602 1/15/2003 ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE INC 248.00 AP- 00192604 1/15/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,025.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192604 1/15/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 720.00 AP- 00192605 1/15/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 187.45 AP- 00192605 1/15/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,092.62 AP - 00192605 1/15/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 400.00 AP- 00192605 1/15/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 34.45 AP - 00192606 1/15/2003 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2,495.30 AP- 00192607 1/15/2003 ASHTON, LYNN 62.00 AP-00192608 1/15/2003 ASSI SECURITY 210.00 AP- 00192608 1/15/2003 ASSI SECURITY 930.00 AP-00192609 1/15/2003 AUTO SPECIALISTS 140.00 AP - 00192610 1/15/2003 AYALA AND SONS INC, GILBERT 5,004.25 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 180.46 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 17.46 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 14.32 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 155.10 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 35.92 AP - 00192611 1/15/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 184.32 AP- 00192613 1/15/2003 BARKED&AUGIE 61.88 AP- 00192615 1/15/2003 BBC AUDIOBOOKS AMERICA 78.13 AP- 00192618 1/15/2003 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 184.63 AP - 00192618 1/15/2003 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 157.50 AP-00192619 1/15/2003 BISHOP COMPANY 11.68 AP - 00192622 1/15/2003 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38 AP - 00192623 1/15/2003 CAL WESTERN PAINT 2,020.31 AP - 00192625 1/15/2003 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 337.00 AP-00192626 1/15/2003 CALSENSE 1,910.71 AP- 00192628 1/15/2003 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS 1NC 452.55 AP - 00192629 1/15/2003 CENTRAL DIVISION ) 167.66 AP-00192630 1/15/2003 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72 AP - 00192631 1/15/2003 CHEVRON USA INC 129.52 AP - 00192632 1/15/2003 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO ]NC -34.72 AP- 00192632 1/15/2003 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 34.72 AP- 00192632 1/15/2003 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 219.19 AP - 00192632 1/15/2003 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 143.17 AP- 00192633 1/15/2003 CITY RENTALS 32.00 AP-00192633 1/15/2003 CITY RENTALS 99.00 AP-00192634 1/15/2003 CLOUT 40.00 AP - 00192634 1/15/2003 CLOUT 60.00 AP - 00192635 1/15/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 98.18 AP - 00192635 1/15/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 9.98 AP- 00192635 1/15/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 29.22 AP - 00192635 1/15/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 55.75 AP- 00192636 1/15/2003 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50 AP - 00192637 1/15/2003 CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES INC 6,700.00 AP - 00192638 1/15/2003 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 362.04 AP - 00192638 1/15/2003 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 11.20 AP - 00192638 1/15/2003 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 372.69 AP - 00192639 1/15/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00 AP - 00192640 1/15/2003 CORTEZ, MELINDA 34.00 AP - 00192640 1/15/2003 CORTEZ, MEL1NDA 1.00 AP - 00192642 1/15/2003 COUNTS UNLIMITED 320.00 AP- 00192644 1/15/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00192645 1/15/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.29 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 12.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name .Amount AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 369.78 AP- 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,167.85 AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 832.25 AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 88.80 AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 104.04 AP- 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 362.93 AP - 00192646 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 74.72 AP - 00192647 1/15/2003 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,190.00 AP- 00192649 1/15/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 362.04 AP - 00192650 1/15/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 975.00 AP- 00192651 1/15/2003 DAPPERTIRE CO 113.23 AP- 00192652 1/15/2003 DE LOS REYES, MAR/LOU 62.00 AP- 00192653 1/15/2003 DELTAMICRO1MAGING INC 4,386.39 AP - 00192655 1/15/2003 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 13,407.82 AP- 00192656 1/15/2003 DIETER/CH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 39.90 AP - 00192656 1/15/2003 DIETER/CH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 8.91 AP- 00192660 1/15/2003 DUNCAN, TOM 10.00 AP - 00192661 1/15/2003 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 3,395.46 AP- 00192661 1/15/2003 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 3,395.46 AP - 00192662 1/15/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,297.31 AP- 00192662 1/15/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 423.70 AP - 00192663 1/15/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 6,749.94 AP- 00192664 1/15/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 2,780.45 AP- 00192665 1/15/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP 1NC 16.16 AP- 00192665 1/15/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 171.30 AP- 00192665 1/15/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP 1NC 179.05 AP- 00192665 1/15/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP 1NC 179.05 AP- 00192666 1/15/2003 ESR/INC 156.00 AP-00192666 1/15/2003 ESR/INC 22,257.00 AP- 00192667 1/15/2003 ESR/INC 200.00 AP- 00192667 1/15/2003 ESR/INC 200.00 AP- 00192668 1/15/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 419.22 AP - 00192669 1/15/2003 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 200.42 AP - 00192670 1/15/2003 EW1NG, THOMAS E 1,000.00 AP- 00192670 1/15/2003 EW1NG, THOMAS E 70.00 AP- 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.27 AP- 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 51.97 AP - 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 171.18 AP- 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.94 AP- 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.50 AP- 00192672 1/15/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.30 AP- 00192673 1/15/2003 FIELDS, JUSTIN 73.00 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 546.90 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.20 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 360.00 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 752.40 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 554.40 AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 484.50 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP- 00192674 1/I5/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 336.38 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 01/28/200 09:38:4 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 444.15 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 506.00 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 552.00 AP- 00192674 1/15/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00 AP-00192675 1/15/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 220.46 AP-00192676 1/15/2003 FLEETGLASS 247.28 AP-00192676 1/15/2003 FLEETGLASS 68.00 AP- 00192677 1/15/2003 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00 AP- 00192678 1/15/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 86.15 AP- 00192678 1/15/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 32.15 AP - 00192679 1/15/2003 FORD PRINTING AND MAILING INC 978.84 AP-00192680 1/15/2003 FORTUNE 17.26 AP- 00192681 1/15/2003 FRANKLIN COVEY CO 17.20 AP-00192683 1/15/2003 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 1,395.00 AP- 00192684 1/15/2003 FULLMERCONSTRUCTION 8,187.10 AP-00192684 1/15/2003 FULLMERCONSTRUCTION 82.70 AP - 00192685 1/15/2003 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 5,882.63 AP-00192687 1/15/2003 GARCIA, VIVIAN 25.56 AP- 00192687 1/15/2003 GARCIA, VIVIAN 25.92 AP-00192688 1/15/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 413.76 AP- 00192688 1/15/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 5,096.58 AP-00192688 1/15/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 775.80 AP- 00192689 1/15/2003 GRAINGER, WW 316.56 AP - 00192690 1/15/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 256.44 AP- 00192690 1/15/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 357.46 AP - 00192690 1/15/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 168.40 AP- 00192691 1/15/2003 HAAKEREQUIPMENT CO 243.81 AP - 00192691 1/15/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 450.21 AP-00192692 1/15/2003 HALE, EVELYN 62.00 AP- 00192693 1/15/2003 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 362.48 AP- 00192694 1/15/2003 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP- 00192696 1/15/2003 HERTZ 193.95 AP- 00192697 1/15/2003 HOCKWALD, CLARK 35.00 AP-00192698 1/15/2003 HOLGUIN, MICHAEL 54.00 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 494.37 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 353.15 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 917.22 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 189.37 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLL1DAY ROCK CO INC 380.90 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.42 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 46.34 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,033.08 AP- 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 135.00 AP - 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 28.28 AP- 00192699 1/15/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 130.99 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 184.45 AP - 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 88.93 AP - 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 72.73 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF t49.79 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 145.87 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 217.78 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 133.89 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOMEDEPOT/GECF 24.29 AP - 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 21.50 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOMEDEPOT/GECF 59.92 AP-00192700 1/15/2003 HOMEDEPOT/GECF 43.07 AP- 00192700 1/15/2003 HOMEDEPOT/GECF 51.30 AP - 00192700 1/15/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 214.78 AP- 00192701 1/15/2003 HOSE MAN INC 48.46 AP- 00192701 1/15/2003 HOSE MAN INC 4.19 AP- 00192701 1/15/2003 HOSE MAN INC 19.79 AP- 00192701 1/15/2003 HOSE MAN INC 39.79 AP- 00192704 1/15/2003 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 217.22 AP-00192705 1/15/2003 HUANG, PRUDENCE 1,650.00 AP-00192706 1/15/2003 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP - 00192707 1/15/2003 HUTCHINGS COURT REPORTERS, LLC 379.80 AP- 00192708 1/15/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 23.37 AP-00192709 1/15/2003 IAEI 90.00 AP-00192710 1/15/2003 IBM CORPORATION 379.03 AP-00192710 1/15/2003 IBM CORPORATION 417.38 AP-00192710 1/15/2003 IBM CORPORATION 171.19 AP - 00192711 1/15/2003 ICMA 1,340.00 AP - 00192711 1/15/2003 ICMA 84.93 AP - 00192714 1/15/2003 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 393.00 AP - 00192714 1/15/2003 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 1,775.00 AP - 00192714 1/15/2003 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 73.38 AP - 00192715 1/15/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 1,101.74 AP - 00192715 1/15/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 1,249.30 AP - 00192716 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 160.80 AP - 00192717 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 135.45 AP- 00192717 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 452.50 AP - 00192717 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 96.75 AP- 00192717 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 452.50 AP- 00192718 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 363.80 AP - 00192718 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 231.84 AP - 00192718 1/15/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 214.40 AP- 00192719 1/15/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 25.86 AP- 00192722 1/15/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 54.90 AP- 00192722 1/15/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 114.04 AP - 00192723 1/15/2003 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 150.00 AP - 00192724 1/15/2003 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION 25.00 AP- 00192725 1/15/2003 J.G. TUCKER AND SONS INC. 399.25 AP - 00192726 1/15/2003 J.M. FARNAN CO INC 1,000.00 AP - 00192727 1/15/2003 JOBS AVAILABLE 347.76 AP- 00192728 1/15/2003 JORGENSEN, SHIRLEY 163.00 AP - 00192729 1/15/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 356.78 AP - 00192729 1/15/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC t04.49 AP-00192730 1/15/2003 KING, BRENDA 124.86 AP - 00192733 1/15/2003 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATION 627.11 AP - 00192734 1/15/2003 LAM, JACK 26.58 AP- 00192735 1/15/2003 LASTING IMPRESSIONS PRINTING CO 510.73 AP - 00192737 1/15/2003 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 105.00 AP - 00192738 1/15/2003 LEFF, ROY A 124.00 AP - 00192739 1/15/2003 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 135.00 AP - 00192741 1/15/2003 LONCAR, PHILIP 61.88 AP - 00192742 1/15/2003 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 261.10 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 th_rough 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192744 1/15/2003 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 387.98 AP- 00192745 1/15/2003 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP-00192747 1/15/2003 LYONS, LANI 12.00 AP-00192747 1/15/2003 LYONS, LANI 5.00 AP- 00192748 1/15/2003 MAHMOND, A. ALY I00.00 AP-00192749 1/15/2003 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 100.00 AP - 00192750 1/15/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,740.00 AP ~ 00192750 1/15/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 2,526.40 AP- 00192751 1/15/2003 MARK CHRIS INC 184.34 AP- 00192751 1/15/2003 MARKCHRIS INC 341.68 AP - 00192752 1/15/2003 MARSHALL AND MCKNIGHT TOWING INC 100.00 AP- 00192753 1/15/2003 MARTINEZUNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00192753 1/15/2003 MART1NEZUNION SERVICE 35.00 AP- 00192753 1/15/2003 MARTINEZUNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00192753 1/15/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00192753 1/15/2003 MARTINEZUNION SERVICE 45.00 AP- 00192753 1/15/2003 MARTINEZUNION SERVICE 45.00 AP-00192754 1/15/2003 MARVAC 83.30 AP - 00192755 1/15/2003 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 48.39 AP-00192756 1/15/2003 MATT'S HARDWARE 21.17 AP-00192757 1/15/2003 McCLINTONMATERIALS 248.53 AP-00192758 1/15/2003 MCFARLIN, BILL 85.00 AP-00192759 1/15/2003 MCSI 0.03 AP- 00192760 1/15/2003 MCSI 409.42 AP-00192761 1/15/2003 MDS CONSULTING 8,337.50 AP- 00192763 1/15/2003 MELLEM, SANDRA 37.00 AP - 00192764 1/15/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP- 00192764 1/15/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 112.95 AP- 00192765 1/15/2003 MIGLOR1NI, ERNIE 73.00 AP- 00192766 1/15/2003 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 192.00 AP- 00192768 1/15/2003 MMASC 200.00 AP- 00192769 1/15/2003 MOBILE MINI 1NC 85.67 AP- 00192769 1/15/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67 AP-00192770 1/15/2003 MYERSTIRE 86.79 AP - 00192771 1/15/2003 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85 AP- 00192772 t/15/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 171.32 AP- 00192772 1/15/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 143.24 AP- 00192772 1/15/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.81 AP- 00192772 1/15/2003 NAPAAUTO PARTS 9.81 AP- 00192772 1/15/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 80.98 AP - 00192773 1/15/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP- 00192774 1/15/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 44,552.95 AP-00192775 1/15/2003 NATIONS RENT 37.72 AP- 00192775 1/15/2003 NATIONS RENT 13.47 AP - 00192777 1/15/2003 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 13,160.00 AP- 00192778 1/15/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 35.00 AP- 00192779 1/I5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 47.92 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 62.84 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 6.99 AP - 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 34.11 AP - 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 38.49 AP - 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 186.26 AP - 00192779 1/15/2003 . OFFICE DEPOT 264.22 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 45.26 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 0/9:38:4 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendo~ Name Amount AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 31.36 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 235.74 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 657.23 AP - 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 12.43 AP ~ 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 74.19 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 79.43 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 249.26 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 56.25 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 78.05 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 113.60 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 63.18 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 31.24 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 93.38 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 56.46 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 59.93 AP-00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 69.18 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 80.11 AP- 00192779 1/15/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.23 AP - 00192780 1/15/2003 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTKAL 77.35 AP-00192781 1/15/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 8.25 AP- 00192782 1/15/2003 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 50,975.97 AP-00192785 1/15/2003 PEREZ, HECTOR 73.00 AP-00192786 1/15/2003 PETERMANLUMBER 233.87 AP - 00192787 1/15/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,238.92 AP- 00192787 1/15/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE [NC 506.21 AP- 00192787 1/15/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 120.53 AP - 00192787 1/15/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 264.10 AP- 00192788 1/15/2003 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 544.98 AP - 00192788 1/15/2003 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 815.58 AP- 00192790 1/15/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,435.35 AP- 00192790 1/15/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 6,937.34 AP-00192791 1/15/2003 PORAC 260.00 AP- 00192792 1/15/2003 POWERPLUS 40.00 AP- 00192792 1/15/2003 POWERPLUS 40.00 AP- 00192793 1/15/2003 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION [NC 63.23 AP - 00192794 1/15/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVEKALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00192794 1/15/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP- 00192794 1/15/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP- 00192796 1/15/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 34.48 AP - 00192796 1/15/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 92.67 AP-00192797 1/15/2003 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 164.42 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 161.38 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 230.03 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP- 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND RAUTOMOTIVE 30.00 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 72.24 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 29.98 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE 717.60 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 402.27 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 421.04 AP 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 285.99 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 01/28/20o Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 /7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 353.86 AP- 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 240.03 AP - 00192798 1/15/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 232.52 AP- 00192799 1/15/2003 RANCHO 2002 LLC 4,284.38 AP - 00192800 1/15/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 2,000.00 AP - 00192801 1/15/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00192804 1/15/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 17.56 AP- 00192804 1/15/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 12.77 AP- 00192804 1/15/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 35.00 AP- 00192805 1/15/2003 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 107.67 AP - 00192806 1/15/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 127.31 AP- 00192806 1/15/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP-00192808 1/15/2003 REED, JOHN 1,375.00 AP-00192809 1/15/2003 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP-00192810 1/15/2003 RHTECHNOLOGY 992.00 AP - 00192810 1/15/2003 RH TECHNOLOGY 768.00 AP - 00192810 1/15/2003 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00 AP - 00192811 t/15/2003 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,065.78 AP- 00192812 1/15/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 21.33 AP- 00192812 1/15/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 23.92 AP ~ 00192813 1/15/2003 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP- 00192814 1/15/2003 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 135.00 AP- 00192815 1/15/2003 ROSS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION, RON 8,242.88 AP- 00192816 1/15/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 258.40 AP- 00192816 1/15/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00 AP- 00192816 1/15/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00 AP- 00192816 1/15/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 149.60 AP- 00192816 1/15/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00 AP - 00192817 1/15/2003 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 125.58 AP - 00192817 1/15/2003 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 55.44 AP- 00192818 1/15/2003 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 146.67 AP ~ 00192819 1/15/2003 SALMON, LENNIE 200.00 AP - 00192821 1/15/2003 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 75.80 AP - 00192822 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00 AP - 00192823 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68 AP - 00192824 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP - 00192825 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 84.91 AP- 00192825 1/15/2003 SANBERN COUNTY 590.52 AP- 00192826 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,825.00 AP - 00192826 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,535.00 AP- 00192827 1/15/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP-00192828 1/15/2003 SBC/PACIFICBELL 55.07 AP-00192828 1/15/2003 SBC/PACIFICBELL 55.07 AP 00192828 1/15/2003 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 1,329.16 AP 00192828 1/15/2003 SBC/PACIFICBELL 32.68 AP 00192829 1/15/2003 SCHOLASTIC INC 1,001.75 AP 00192829 1/15/2003 SCHOLASTIC INC 66.21 AP 00192830 1/15/2003 SERRANO, IRENE 2.00 AP 00192831 1/15/2003 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 1,807.43 AP 00192832 1/15/2003 SIMMONS, ARLENE 230.00 AP - 00192833 1/15/2003 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP - 00192833 1/15/2003 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 218.50 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00192834 1/15/2003 SIRSPEEDY 2,042.62 AP - 00192836 1/15/2003 SMART AND FINAL 33.17 AP - 00192836 1/15/2003 SMART AND FINAL 42.62 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALiF EDISON CO 489.78 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 9,602.87 AP - 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 58.00 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,956.09 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 28.87 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,826.63 AP- 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 49.55 AP - 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 67.57 AP - 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 60.62 AP - 00192837 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 6,236.22 AP - 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 19,429.89 AP- 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 14,992.80 AP - 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,727.75 / AP-00192838 1/15/2003 SO CAL1F EDISON CO 2,868.67 AP- 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 181.47 AP- 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 46,224.16 AP- 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 44.24 AP 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIFEDISON CO 4,212.90 AP 00192838 1/15/2003 SO CALIF EDISON CO 12,120.96 AP 00192839 1/15/2003 SOCALIFGAS COMPANY 430.83 AP 00192839 1/15/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,331.04 AP 00192839 1/15/2003 SOCALIF GAS COMPANY 403.99 AP 00192839 1/15/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 580.99 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.54 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.22 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.65 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.65 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.90 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.51 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.33 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.11 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.78 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.23 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,712.13 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.76 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.22 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.06 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 192.34 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.08 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.52 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.27 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.13 AP - 00192842 I/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.44 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.91 User: ahtmsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 lq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.02 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.11 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.51 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.19 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.13 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.45 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.77 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.86 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.14 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.78 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.62 AP- 00192842 1/I5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 338.84 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.95 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.20 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.32 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. 13.82 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.20 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.72 AP 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 208.19 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.12 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.22 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.01 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP - 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP- 00192842 1/15/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.39 AP - 00192843 1/15/2003 STADIUM SELF STORAGE 525.00 AP - 00192844 1/15/2003 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 548.17 AP - 00192844 1/15/2003 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 255.37 AP - 00192844 1/I5/2003 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 1,595.87 AP- 00192844 1/15/2003 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 68.59 AP - 00192844 1/15/2003 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 741.47 AP - 00192845 1/15/2003 STATE NET 275.00 AP - 00192846 1/15/2003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 71.37 AP- 00192847 1/15/2003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6,412.76 AP - 00192848 1/15/2003 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00192849 1/15/2003 STERICYCLE INC 490.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192850 1/15/2003 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 310.61 AP- 00192850 1/15/2003 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 408.81 AP- 00192851 1/15/2003 STOFA, JOSEPH 24.00 AP - 00192852 1/15/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 531.61 AP-00192853 1/15/2003 SUNRISE FORD 69.43 AP-00192853 1/15/2003 SUNRISE FORD 46.45 AP- 00192853 1/15/2003 SUNRISE FORD -24.46 AP - 00192854 1/15/2003 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 825.36 AP- 00192855 1/15/2003 TECOTZKY, RALPH 71.53 AP-00192856 1/15/2003 TERMINIXINTERNATIONAL 67.00 AP - 00192856 1/15/2003 TERM1NIX INTERNATIONAL 56.00 AP - 00192856 1/15/2003 TERM1NIX INTERNATIONAL 162.00 AP - 00192857 1/15/2003 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 6.00 AP-00192857 1/15/2003 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 22.20 AP-00192857 1/15/2003 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 158.04 AP- 00192857 1/15/2003 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 8.00 AP-00192858 1/15/2003 TREADWAYGRAPHICS 159.00 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 3,914.50 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCAREREGIONAL 4,475.22 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,225.60 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 14,601.98 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,547.54 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 20,653.20 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 5,575.50 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 474.66 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 184.55 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 12,421.74 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 10,373.00 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,000.41 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 11,930.60 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 14,261.29 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 47.93 AP - 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 56,757.83 AP- 00192859 1/15/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 4,548.00 AP- 00192860 1/15/2003 U T I 219.85 AP - 00192860 1/15/2003 U T I 131.85 AP - 00192861 1/15/2003 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 287.50 AP - 00t92862 1/15/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 113.20 AP - 00192862 1/15/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORIVl SERVICE 567.39 AP- 00192862 1/15/2003 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP- 00192862 1/15/2003 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00192863 1/15/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 47,682.27 AP - 00192865 1/15/2003 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 258.53 AP- 00192865 1/15/2003 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 332.22 AP- 00192866 1/15/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 31.38 AP- 00192866 1/15/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 19.86 AP- 00192867 1/15/2003 UNITED TRAFFIC 56.03 AP- 00192868 1/15/2003 UNITED WAY 620.32 AP - 00192869 1/15/2003 VAN DYK, JOHN G 62.00 AP - 00192869 1/15/2003 VAN DYK, JOHN G 5.00 AP - 00192870 1/15/2003 VARGAS, CYBILL 34.00 AP - 00192871 1/15/2003 VEND U VENDING 228.46 AP - 00192872 1/15/2003 VERBERA, PHIL 1,560.00 AP - 00192873 1/15/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4,335.01 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192873 1/15/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 2,090.53 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 22.24 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 401.59 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 37.08 AP - 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 41.71 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 466.48 AP - 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 1,280.54 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 27.49 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 58.94 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 34.12 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 319.21 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 29.14 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 147.45 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 36.98 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 29.80 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 27.71 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.88 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 129.01 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP - 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 90.90 AP-00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 179.68 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 28.67 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 28.67 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 33.11 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 28.67 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 466.48 AP- 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 531.91 AP - 00192875 1/15/2003 VERIZON 61.99 AP - 00192876 1/15/2003 VERIZON 1,650.00 AP- 00192877 1/15/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00 AP- 00192878 1/15/2003 VILLAGOMEZ, CHAP, LEI 30.66 AP - 00192879 1/15/2003 VISTA PAINT 855.79 AP- 00192879 1/15/2003 VISTA PAINT 97.21 AP- 00192880 1/15/2003 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00192881 1/15/2003 WALKER, KENNETH A 73.00 AP- 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 165.88 AP - 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 54.48 User: ahunsber - Aim Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 381.28 AP - 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 317.16 AP - 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 188.35 AP- 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 54.94 AP - 00192882 1/15/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 275.61 AP - 00192883 1/15/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 357.75 AP- 00192883 1/15/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 12.80 AP - 00192883 1/15/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 206.38 AP - 00192883 1/15/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 591.92 AP-00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 1,022.08 AP-00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 8.75 AP- 00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 385.23 AP-00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 69.36 AP- 00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 237.44 AP- 00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 822.75 AP-00192884 1/15/2003 WAXIE 126.80 AP- 00192885 1/15/2003 WAY SERVICE COMPANY 1,000.00 AP - 00192886 1/15/2003 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER 808.40 AP - 00192887 1/15/2003 WILLEY & ASSOC DBA LASER LINE 136.89 AP- 00192888 1/15/2003 WORLDCOM 704.26 AP-00192890 1/15/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89 AP- 00192890 1/15/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP- 00192890 1/15/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 32.94 AP-00192890 1/15/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP- 00192890 1/15/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP-00192891 1/15/2003 YEE, LARRY 57.00 AP-00192892 1/15/2003 YOUNAN, MEDHAT 100.00 AP - 00192893 1/15/2003 YWCA OF THE WEST END 449.05 AP- 00192894 1/16/2003 HUBBARD, MONICA J 85.00 AP- 00192895 1/16/2003 KORANDACONSTRUCTION 2,315.00 AP- 00192896 1/16/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 4,950.00 AP-00192897 1/16/2003 KORANDACONSTRUCTION 7,509.60 AP- 00192898 1/16/2003 KORANDACONSTRUCTION 7,194.00 AP-00192899 1/16/2003 KORANDACONSTRUCTION 836.00 AP- 00192900 1/16/2003 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 227.40 AP- 00192901 1/16/2003 CDW GOVERNMENT 1NC. 483.82 AP- 00192901 1/16/2003 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 967.62 AP - 00192901 1/16/2003 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 1,451.43 AP - 00192902 1/16/2003 JAMESCO 431.00 AP- 00192902 1/16/2003 JAMESCO 107.75 AP - 00192903 1/22/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 38.25 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 334.83 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 47.40 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 34.25 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 968.08 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 29.48 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.46 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.58 AP- 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 76.89 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 447.92 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 535.12 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 679.95 AP - 00192904 1/22/2003 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.80 User: ahnnsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC ~ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00192905 1/22/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 22.63 AP-00192906 1/22/2003 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00192907 1/22/2003 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT [NC 474.10 AP - 00192908 1/22/2003 ABSOLUTE COURT REPORTING 1,066.07 AP - 00192908 1/22/2003 ABSOLUTE COURT REPORTING 1,494.33 AP- 00192910 1/22/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 2,887.50 AP- 00192911 1/22/2003 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 1,365.00 AP - 00192913 1/22/2003 ALTA LOMA CHARTER L1NES 601.50 AP- 00192914 1/22/2003 ARCHITER/LADESIGN GROUP 360.00 AP - 00192914 1/22/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,008.00 AP- 00192916 ~ 1/22/2003 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 2,050.25 AP-00192916 1/22/2003 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 5,089.75 AP- 00192917 1/22/2003 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 AP - 00192917 1/22/2003 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,989.07 AP-00192918 1/22/2003 AUFBAU CORPORATION 15,355.00 AP- 00192918 1/22/2003 AUFBAU CORPORATION 14,652.00 AP- 00192920 1/22/2003 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 2,482.26 AP- 00192921 1/22/2003 B AND K'ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 140.14 AP-00192923 1/22/2003 BROCK, ALLEN 25.00 AP- 00192925 1/22/2003 CALSENSE 161.54 AP- 00192925 1/22/2003 CALSENSE 7,486.60 AP - 00192926 1/22/2003 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS 4,095.00 AP - 00192926 1/22/2003 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS 5,078.00 AP - 00192927 1/22/2003 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 86.20 AP- 00192927 1/22/2003 CHAMPION AWARDSAND SPECIALIES 1,370.58 AP-00192928 1/22/2003 CHARTER MEDIA 1,552.00 AP- 00192928 1/22/2003 CHARTER MEDIA 672.00 AP- 00192929 1/22/2003 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 86.15 AP - 00192930 1/22/2003 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP- 00192931 1/22/2003 CLAREMONT CAMERA AND VIDEO 1NC 252.11 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 559.37 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 87.92 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 500.03 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 1,000.10 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 224.31 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 500.03 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 112.51 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 112.51 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 500.03 AP - 00192932 1/22/2003 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 112.51 AP 00192933 1/22/2003 COSOI, MARIUS 73.00 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 83.35 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 385.59 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 141.82 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 859.39 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 69.02 AP 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 37.44 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 72.32 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 91.89 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 195.62 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.18 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 236.91 AP ~ 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 305.92 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 42.45 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 254.42 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 173.05 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 143.18 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 236.91 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 365.66 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 139.06 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 227.64 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 211.16 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 292.49 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 97.61 AP ~ 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 237.97 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 40.53 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 38.33 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 119.49 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 19.93 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 458.36 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 32.29 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 519.49 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 592.03 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 218.73 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 420.61 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 208.43 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 270.23 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 406.19 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 201.22 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,552.58 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 380.44 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 398.98 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 213.58 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 556.57 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 122.94 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 72.36 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 395.89 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 37.30 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 336.15 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.97 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 372.20 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 560.61 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 348.51 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 489.25 AP - 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 40.44 AP- 00192935 1/22/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 362.84 AP-00192936 1/22/2003 CURATALO, GRACE 286.14 AP- 00192937 1/22/2003 D AND B VISIONS 100.00 AP - 00192940 1/22/2003 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP- 00192941 1/22/2003 DIRECTV 27.99 AP - 00192942 1/22/2003 DIVERSIFIED REPAIR & CONSTRUCTION 5,571.00 AP- 00192943 1/22/2003 EGGERS~BOB 316.00 AP- 00192944 1/22/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,519.28 AP - 00192946 1/22/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,815.00 AP - 00192946 1/22/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 2,793.61 AP - 00192946 1/22/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 517.43 AP - 00192946 1/22/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 784.88 AP- 00192946 1/22/2003 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 304.73 User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192947 1/22/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 112.50 AP- 00192948 1/22/2003 ESR][NC 13,784.89 AP - 00192948 1/22/2003 ESR] [NC 325.49 AP - 00192949 1/22/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 48.49 AP- 00192950 1/22/2003 EWING, THOMAS E 70.00 AP-00192951 1/22/2003 EXPER]AN 62.00 AP-00192952 1/22/2003 FIELDS, JUSTIN 73.00 AP- 00192953 1/22/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.20 AP- 00192953 1/22/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00 AP- 00192953 1/22/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 314.50 AP- 00192953 1/22/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 552.00 AP- 00192953 1/22/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 546.90 AP- 00192954 1/22/2003 FINGERPRINT EQUIPMENT LABS INC. 413.54 AP- 00192955 1/22/2003 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 461.98 AP- 00192956 1/22/2003 GADABOUT TOURS INC 200.00 AP - 00192957 1/22/2003 GENTOSIBUILDERS 1,000.00 AP- 00192958 1/22/2003 GOFF, FRED 73.00 AP - 00192959 1/22/2003 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 78.24 AP - 00192960 1/22/2003 GRAINGER, WW 697.52 AP-00192961 1/22/2003 GRALNIK, GREGORY 54.00 AP - 00192962 1/22/2003 GRANLIBAKKEN MANAGEMENT COMPANY L~I 1,165.00 AP-00192963 1/22/2003 GROSSBERG, DAV1D 286.14 AP-00192964 1/22/2003 GUTIERREZ, REX 286.14 AP- 00192965 1/22/2003 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 365.01 AP - 00192966 1/22/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 11,406.17 AP - 00192966 1/22/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 1,200.00 AP- 00192967 1/22/2003 HMC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC. 225.00 AP-00192968 1/22/2003 HOCKWALD, CLARK 170.00 AP- 00192969 1/22/2003 HOLGUIN, MICHAEL 54.00 AP - 00192970 1/22/2003 HOME DEPOT/GECF 75.28 AP- 00192972 1/22/2003 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP- 00192975 1/22/2003 HUEY, KEV[N 286.14 AP - 00192976 1/22/2003 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 1,050.00 AP-00192977 1/22/2003 IBM CORPORATION 417.38 AP-00192978 1/22/2003 IBM CORPORATION 612.47 AP-00192979 1/22/2003 ICBO 45.00 AP - 00192980 1/22/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00192980 1/22/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00192980 1/22/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00192980 1/22/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP- 00192981 1/22/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 125.15 AP- 00192982 1/22/2003 INTELLITECH 196.90 AP - 00192984 1/22/2003 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 700.00 AP- 00192985 1/22/2003 IRELAND SOUND SYSTEMS 370.54 AP ~ 00192986 1/22/2003 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 357.00 AP 00192987 1/22/2003 IRR]GATIONASSOCIATION 25.00 AP 00192988 1/22/2003 J J KELLER AND ASSOC [NC 64.15 AP 00192989 1/22/2003 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 262.46 AP 00192990 1/22/2003 JCC DEVELOPMENT 628.00 AP 00192991 1/22/2003 JIMENEZ, JOSE C 225.00 AP 00192992 1/22/2003 JUAREZ, GUS R 100.00 AP 00192993 1/22/2003 KB HOME 3.00 AP - 00192994 1/22/2003 KCE COMPANY 69,700.00 AP- 00192994 1/22/2003 KCE COMPANY 18,320.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 26 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192996 1/22/2003 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 5,254.50 AP - 00192997 1/22/2003 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS TECHNICAL COMMI 300.00 AP- 00192998 1/22/2003 LEFF, ROY A 135.00 AP - 00192999 1/22/2003 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 92.07 AP- 00193000 1/22/2003 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 350.00 AP - 00193002 1/22/2003 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 465.82 AP - 00193004 1/22/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 163.76 AP - 00193005 1/22/2003 MARK CHRIS INC 83.31 AP - 00193005 1/22/2003 MARK CHRIS I-NC 27.55 AP - 00193005 1/22/2003 MARK CHRIS 1NC 40.92 AP - 00193006 1/22/2003 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT 2,500.00 AP - 00193007 1/22/2003 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT 2,500.00 AP - 00193008 1/22/2003 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT 500.00 AP - 00193009 1/22/2003 MARTINDALE, MARIE 150.00 AP - 00193011 1/22/2003 MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY 1,300.00 AP - 00193011 1/22/2003 MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY 1,350.00 AP - 00193012 1/22/2003 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 1,411.20 AP-00193013 1/22/2003 MOATAKEF, DAVID 54.00 AP - 00193014 1/22/2003 MR TS 24HR TOWING 127.50 AP- 00193015 1/22/2003 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP - 00193018 1/22/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP- 00193019 1/22/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 7,466.24 AP- 00193020 1/22/2003 NATIONS RENT 104.41 AP-00193021 1/22/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 35.00 AP - 00193022 1/22/2003 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 296.28 AP- 00193023 1/22/2003 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 70.00 AP - 00193024 1/22/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 109.29 AP- 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 31.32 AP-00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 44.84 AP-00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 105.17 AP- 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 238.23 AP- 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 31.32 AP-00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 25.92 AP - 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 78.23 AP-00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 195.37 AP 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.86 AP 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 3.19 AP 00193025 1/22/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.44 AP 00193026 1/22/2003 OMNITRANS 460.00 AP 00193027 1/22/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 76.70 AP 00193027 1/22/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 430.00 AP 00193027 1/22/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 1,000.00 AP-00193027 1/22/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 2,558.90 AP - 00193029 1/22/2003 PC WORLD 19.97 AP - 00193030 1/22/2003 PINHEIRO, KAFAEL LEON 40.00 AP - 00193031 1/22/2003 POINTS OF LIGHT FOLrNDATION, THE 30.25 AP- 00193032 1/22/2003 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 60.00 AP - 00193033 1/22/2003 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 86.93 AP- 00193033 1/22/2003 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 54.80 AP - 00193035 1/22/2003 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 226.88 AP - 00193036 1/22/2003 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS 28.88 a AP - 00193036 1/22/2003 PAGAN COMMUNICATIONS 129.00 AP - 00193037 1/22/2003 RCPFA 4,101.68 AP- 00193038 1/22/2003 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 256.34 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 27 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00193039 1/22/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 43.26 AP- 00193039 1/22/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 48.58 AP - 00193039 1/22/2003 ILEXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 689.60 AP - 00193039 1/22/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 173.05 AP - 00193040 1/22/2003 Pd-I TECHNOLOGY 768.00 AP- 00193041 1/22/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 93.74 AP- 00193041 1/22/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 39.44 AP - 00193042 1/22/2003 RMA GROUP 284.00 AP - 00193043 1/22/2003 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 52.50 AP - 00193045 1/22/2003 ROOMS TO GO [NC 39.90 AP - 00193046 1/22/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 317.15 AP - 00193046 1/22/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES [NC 299.20 AP - 00193047 1/22/2003 S W R C B 6,250.00 AP - 00193048 1/22/2003 SAFFRON CATERING & EVENT SERVICES 208.01 AP- 00193049 1/22/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 99,525.00 AP- 00193050 1/22/2003 SANBERN COUNTY 13.00 AP- 00193051 1/22/2003 SCCCA 60.00 AP - 00193052 1/22/2003 SIERRA SPRINGS 396.00 AP-00193052 1/22/2003 SIERRA SPRINGS 269.55 AP- 00193053 1/22/2003 SIGN SHOP, THE 720.63 AP- 00193055 1/22/2003 SIRSPEEDY 1,680.90 AP - 00193057 1/22/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 287.56 AP-00193058 1/22/2003 SONSATIONALACTIVITIES 200.00 AP 00193058 1/22/2003 SONSATIONALACTIVITIES 200.00 AP 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.48 AP 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.80 AP 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.35 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.97 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.04 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.08 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 230.65 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.86 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.63 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.32 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.28 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 191.41 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.98 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.37 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.86 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.22 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 401.40 AP-00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 287.30 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 266.08 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,951.84 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,558.46 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 261.47 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 285.52 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.70 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 28 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REGPORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.25 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.82 AP - 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFOP-.NIA EDISON 13.53 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00193060 1/22/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00193061 1/22/2003 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 2,604.32 AP-00193062 1/22/2003 STARK, RON 286.14 AP - 00193063 1/22/2003 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 44.00 AP - 00193064 1/22/2003 STETKEVICH, OP,~ST 40.00 AP - 00193065 1/22/2003 SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE 137.00 AP - 00193066 1/22/2003 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 1,200.00 AP- 00193067 1/22/2003 SUNRISE FORD 537.57 AP - 00193068 1/22/2003 SURE SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 95.00 AP- 00193069 1/22/2003 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,507.57 AP- 00193070 1/22/2003 TARGET 124.72 AP- 00193074 1/22/2003 TOTALPLAN 1,201.41 AP- 00193075 1/22/2003 TOXGUARD 358.10 AP - 00193076 1/22/2003 TRAINING NETWORK, THE 80.90 AP- 00193077 1/22/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCAREREGIONAL 4,418.00 AP - 00193077 1/22/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 3,905.00 AP - 00193077 1/22/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,840.00 AP - 00193078 1/22/2003 U S BANK TRUST 2,600.00 AP - 00193079 1/22/2003 U T I 114.31 AP- 00193079 1/22/2003 U T I 137.54 AP - 00193081 1/22/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 47,160.57 AP- 00193083 1/22/2003 VERIZONWIRELESS 87.76 AP- 00193083 1/22/2003 VERIZONWIRELESS 201.80 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 35.50 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.46 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 35.50 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 27.06 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.59 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.59 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON / 89.59 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 5.56 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 54.85 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 40.51 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 35.50 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 110.09 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 27.16 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERiZON 89.47 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.59 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 27.71 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 27.71 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.59 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 90.91 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 35.43 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 29 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/8/2003 through 1/24/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 89.47 AP-00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 31.89 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP - 00193084 1/22/2003 VERIZON 26.86 AP-00193085 1/22/2003 VERIZON 30.51 AP - 00193086 1/22/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00 AP - 00193087 1/22/2003 VILLALUZ, TED 73.00 AP - 00193088 1/22/2003 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANANGER VPM 500.00 AP-00193089 1/22/2003 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 1,185.40 AP- 00193089 1/22/2003 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 523.10 AP- 00193090 1/22/2003 WAXIE 332.79 AP- 00193090 1/22/2003 WAXIE 978.64 AP- 00193091 1/22/2003 WELLS FARGO BANK 4,600.00 AP - 00193093 1/22/2003 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 441.78 AP- 00193094 1/22/2003 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY,THE 5,050.00 AP-00193095 1/22/2003 WILLIAMS, DIANE 286.14 AP- 00193096 1/22/2003 WOMEN 1N LEISURE SERVICES 48.00 AP - 00193097 1/22/2003 WON DOOR CORPORATION 75.00 AP- 00193097 1/22/2003 WONDOOR CORPORATION 266.50 AP-00193098 1/22/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 90.00 AP - 00193099 1/22/2003 YEE, LARRY 292.00 AP - 00193100 1/22/2003 YWCA OF THE WEST END 488.57 AP- 00193101 1/22/2003 ZEE MEDICALINC 75.79 AP- 00193103 1/22/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 4,118.74 AP - 00193104 1/22/2003 GWYNN, CHRIS 3,500.00 AP - 00193105 1/22/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEE ACTMTY ] 1,100.00 Total for Check ID AP: 1,718,785.77 Total for Entity: 1,718,785.77 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 30 Current Date: 01/28/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:38:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator ~ SUBJECT: Destruction of City Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representatives, the Department Head and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) Resolution No. 03-~ Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the Personnel Division have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 03-*** Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2003 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day of February, 2003. Executed this 6th day of February, 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 03-*** Page 3 EXHIBIT 'A' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Personnel Requestor: Chris Pittenger I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and, as such, arc not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the semi-annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fi'om Records Retention Records / Documents CMo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 5090.3 - Personnel Recruitments All that were completed prior to January, 2000 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature Date ~/S~ignature Date Council Approval Date / Resolution # Destroyed by: Signature Date T H E C I T ¥ 0 ~ I~A N C Ii 0 C U C A M 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II1-~' SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution urging the California Legislature to reject the Governor's proposed shift of local Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues and honor their 1998 commitment to keep cities and counties whole by "backfilling" VLF revenues. Back.qround Since 1935, cities and counties have received the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) in lieu of locally collected property taxes on vehicles. In 1948, the VLF rate was set at 2% of the value of the vehicle. In 1986, California voters, by an 81.8% margin, passed Proposition 47, constitutionally dedicating the proceeds of VLF to fund local government services. The VLF remained at the 2% rate for 44 years until 1998 when, in a strong economic period for the State, the Legislature approved a phased reduction in the amount of VLF paid by vehicle owners. As a result, vehicle owners now pay a VLF rate that is 67.5% lower. At the time that the VLF was reduced, the Legislature pledged to keep local government whole by "backfilling" the revenue losses to cities and counties with State's funds. Due to the State's current fiscal crisis, the Governor is proposing to eliminate this "backfill" to local government. If approved by the Legislature, this would deal a devastating blow to local government. Rancho Cucamonga would lose $2.5 million in the current fiscal year and $5.5 million next year. These amounts represent 16% of the discretionary funds in the City's general fund. Losing that much in revenues would require severe cuts to services and programs that are essential to our community, the most important of which is public safety. The Legislature is now considering the Governor's budget proposals, including the VLF takeaway. The League of California Cities is requesting that cities adopt a resolution urging that the Legislature reject the Governor's VLF proposal that abandon's the 1998 commitment to backfill our VLF revenues. The proposed resolution states that cities and counties are dependent on VLF revenues to provide critical services and the Governor's proposal will unfairly require cities and counties to bear a disproportionate share of the State's budget pain. February 5, 2003 Staff Report: Approval of Vehicle License Fee Resolution Page 2 Recommendation Approve the attached Resolution urging the California Legislature to reject the Governor's proposed shift of local Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues and honor their commitment to keep cities whole by "backfilling" revenues after the VLF was decreased by the State in 1998. Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III RESOLUTION NO. ~.~' ~///~ A RESOLUTION URGING THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO REJECT THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED SHIFT OF LOCAL VLF REVENUES WHEREAS, prior to 1935, cities and counties collected property taxes on motor vehicles to fund essential local public health and safety services; and WHEREAS, in 1935, the Legislature first enacted the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Act, replacing the property tax on vehicles with a 1.75 percent fee charged against the value of the motor vehicle; and, WHEREAS, in 1948, the rate of the VLF was increased to 2 percent of the value of the vehicle; and, WHEREAS, in 1986, the voters voted overwhelmingly to constitutionally dedicate the proceeds of the VLF to fund city and county services; and, WHEREAS, in 1998, a period of strong economic growth, the Legislature approved the use of a portion of the rapidly growing state General Fund to reduce the VLF payments of vehicle owners. This amount, known as the "offset", grew in future years to a 67.5 percent offset against the amount owed. The amount paid to local governments in lieu of the reduced VLF payment is known as the "VLF backfill"; and, WHEREAS, at the time that the State decreased the VLF rate, the Legislature promised to continue to make cities and counties whole by "backfilling" their VLF revenue losses with State funds; and, WHEREAS, VLF and backfill revenues constitute 15 to 25 percent of typical city and county general purpose revenues. On average, more than 60 percent of city general fund spending and more than half of county general funds go to front line law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, and health care programs; and, WHEREAS, revenues derived from the VLF and backfill are of critical importance in funding vital local public health and safety services; and, WHEREAS, any failure by the Legislature to maintain the VLF backfill will cause widespread disruption in local government services essential to the well-being of California citizens and their cities and counties; and, WHEREAS, Governor Davis'. proposal to divert $4 biilion in local VLF backfill payments over the next 17 months fails to honor the 1998 commitment and is a direct assault on local services that will be felt by every California resident; and, WHEREAS, shifting $4.2 billion in locally controlled revenues for local services is neither equitable nor fair. No state program or department has been asked to shoulder such a disproportionate share of the budget pain. These cuts come on top of the nearly $5 billion each year that is transferred from local services to fund state obligations. Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby respectfully urges the California State Legislature to reject the Governor's proposed shift of Local Vehicle License Fee Revenues and honor the 1998 commitment made to keep cities and counties whole by "backfilling" VLF revenues. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ,2003. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the __ day of ,2003. Executed this day of ,2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk TH E CITY 0 F ~AN C ~I 0 C ~I CAM 0 N GA Memorandum TO: ' Mayor and Members of the City Council ]ack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra 3. Adams, CMC, City Clerk/Records Manage DATE: February 5, 2003 SUIL1E~I': REMOVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM D5 Please remove item D5 from the Consent Calendar in order to obtain additional information for Council's consideration. Staff will be placing the item on a future agenda. /dja T H E C I T Y 0 F [ I I~AN C H 0 ClJ CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk BY: Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II SUBJECT: APPROVE SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONVERTING MICROFILM TO DIGITAL IMAGES AND SCANNING BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION PLANS, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000.00 FROM ACCOUNT 101-6301-5300. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve single source vendor, Delta Microlmaging, Inc., for the purpose of converting microfilm to digital images and for scanning Building and Safety Division plans. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City uses LaserFiche as our electronic document imaging system. It is required that the vendor complete the template indexing on the converted images, and it is important that the vendor selected use LaserFiche as well. Delta Microlmaging, Inc., submitted lower cost proposals than other vendors. After reviewing sample selections of converted images, and since the work produced is consistently of good quality, it is recommended Delta Microlmaging, Inc., be used on a regular basis. Scanning, conversion and customer service are outstanding. Respectfully Submitted, City Clerk THE C J T Y 0 F ]~ANCIIO C UCAI, IONCA staff Report TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager DATE: February 5, 2003 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PIGGYBACK CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FROM POMA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., OF SAN BERNARDINO, IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ~i169,000.00, FUNDED FROM FUNDS 1001-317-5255 AND 1001-3t7-5256 AND AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $143,000.00 FUNDED FROM FUND 1001-701-5255 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of a piggyback contract for the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuel for Fleet Maintenance and the Police Department, with an option to renew foran additional two years, to Poma Distributing, of San Bemardino, in an annual amount not to exceed $169,000.00, funded from funds 1001-317-5255 and 1001-317- 5256 and an annual amount not to exceed $143,000.00 funded from fund 1001-701-5255. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Purchasing determined it was time to review the current procurements for gasoline and diesel fuels. After research and analysis, it has been determined that an offer from Poma Distributing Company, Inc. to piggyback on San Bemardino County's contract RFP-8, dated October 10, 2002, is the most advantageous opportunity for the City. No other vendor was able to offer a comparable contract for a piggyback opportunity. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director T H C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SlaffReport DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor William J. Alexander, Members of City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF YEARLY AGREEMENT WITH NEC, BNS COMPANY TO PROVIDE A CITYWlDE TELEPHONE MAINTENANCE, AGREEMENT PIGGYBACKING OFF OF A COMPETITIVELY BID, FAST OPEN CONTRACTS UTILIZATION SERVICES (FOCUS), FROM THE COUNTY OF MERCED, CALIFORNIA FOR THE FIRST YEARLY AMOUNT OF $65,000 PLUS AN ESTIMATED 10% YEARLY INCREASE FROM ACCOUNT 1001-205-5300 ENDING FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the piggyback agreement with NEC, BNS for yearly maintenance and modifications for the City's telephone system in the first yearly amount $65,000 ($55,000 base maintenance plus $10,000 for various adds moves and changes) plus an incremental yearly adjustment from account 1001-205-5300 for a five-year period ending in fiscal year 2007/2008. BACKGROUND NEC, BNS is the current maintenance company providing service to the City's telephone system. Earlier this year, the current telephone vendor agreement was terminated. Because of the immediate need for daily service of the City's telephone network, NEC, BNS was contracted to take over the current maintenance contract to ensure continuation of service for the City's telephone campus environment. After assessment of the transition to our account, their continued reliability, and current technical knowledge of our network, the City has assessed a piggyback opportunity to continue the maintenance agreement with NEC, BNS. Page 2 NEC BNS Staff Report This opportunity also includes a variety of Cisco products and various associated equipment and services possibly needed for future projects for the City's communication needs. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director TH E CiTY OF ]~ANCHO CUCAHONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Uanage~~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer~,~ BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: crrY COUNCIL AGENDA FrEM D-8; APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER PORTIONS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/19TM STREET BETWEEN THE CITY'S WEST CITY LIMITS AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, THE INTERSECTION OF LEMON AVENUE AND MARBELLA DRIVE, ALTA LOMA DRIVE FROM REVERE AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, PORTIONS OF CHICKASAW ROAD AND EAST AVENUE, AND PORTIONS OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND CHERRY AVENUE, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This item needs to be removed from the City Council Agenda because Caltrans had to change a right-of-way map. By having to change the right-of-way map, Caltrans had to pull this from the February 26, 2003 CTC Agenda. This will come back to the City Council at a later date. WJO:JO:dlw THE CITY O F ]~AN CII 0 CU CAM 0 N GA DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER PORTIONS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/19TM STREET BETWEEN THE CITY'S WEST CITY LIMITS AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, THE INTERSECTION OF LEMON AVENUE AND MARBELLA DRIVE, ALTA LOMA DRIVE FROM REVERE AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, PORTIONS OF CHICKASAW ROAD AND EAST AVENUE, AND PORTIONS OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND CHERRY AVENUE, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, approve accepting control and maintenance over portions of Highland Avenue/19th Street between the City's west city limits and Etiwanda Avenue, the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Marbella Drive, Alta Loma Drive from Revere Avenue to Haven Avenue, portions of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue, and portions of Summit Avenue and Cherry Avenue, to be relinquished by the State of California, and waive the standard 90-day notice requirement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Anticipating construction and/or reconstruction of streets within the City by Caltrans due to freeway construction, the City and Caltrans entered into an agreement on March 4, 1998, whereby the City agreed to accept title to these roads upon relinquishment thereof to the City by Caltrans, provided the roads were constructed according to approved plans. These street relinquishments are shown on the attached State of California Right-of- Way Maps numbered Request No. 437-S, sheets 1 through 5, No. 440-S, sheets 1 and 2, and No. 432-S, sheets 1 through 3. Map 437-S covers Highland/19th Street from the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET RELINQUISHMENTS February 5, 2003 Page 2 City's west city limits to Etiwanda Avenue, the reconstructed intersection of Lemon Avenue and Marbella Drive, and Alta Loma Drive from Revere Avenue to Haven Avenue. Alta Loma Drive was constructed as an extension of Highland Avenue from Revere to Haven leading into the shopping center on the north side of the freeway. Map 432-S shows a portion of Summit Avenue reconstructed during the freeway work east of Cherry Avenue, and a portion of Cherry Avenue reconstructed south of Summit Avenue. Map 440-S shows reconstructed portions of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue at their intersection. Caltrans has agreed to relinquish to the City these portions of streets within the City if we accept control and maintenance thereof. Since these roadways are in "the state of good repair", it is recommended they be accepted by the City and to expedite these relinquishments, it is recommended the 90-day notice be waived. If Council approves this resolution, Caltrans will make every effort to agendize these relinquishments for the next California Transportation Commission on February 26, 2003. Respectfully submitted, ' Willi~r~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WHO:MO:sc Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~) ~-~)/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ACCEPTING CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OVER PORTIONS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/19TM STREET BETWEEN THE CITY'S WEST CITY LIMITS AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, THE INTERSECTION OF LEMON AVENUE AND MARBELLA DRIVE, ALTA LOMA DRIVE FROM REVERE AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, PORTIONS OF CHICKASAW ROAD AND EAST AVENUE, AND PORTIONS OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND CHERRY AVENUE, TO BE RELINQUISHED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND TO WAIVE THE STANDARD 90-DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENT WHEREAS, by Freeway Agreement No. 98-010, dated March 4, 1998, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CITY) and the State of California, Department of Transportation (STATE), and by Resolution No. 98-039, dated March 4, 1998, the City agreed to accept title to frontage roads and reconstructed City streets upon relinquishment thereof to said City by the State of California; and WHEREAS, STATE desires to relinquish portions of Highland Avenue/19th Street between the City's west city limits and Etiwanda Avenue, the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Marbella Drive, Alta Loma Drive from Revere Avenue to Haven Avenue, portions of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue, and portions of Summit Avenue and Cherry Avenue; and WHEREAS, said relinquishments are as shown on State of California Right-of-Way Maps numbered 437-S, sheets 1 through 5; 432-S, sheets 1 through 3; and 440-S, sheets 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to accept control and maintenance of said roads; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to waive its 90-day notice requirement and agrees to accept title to said roads upon relinquishment thereof to said City by the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approve by resolution acceptance of control; and maintenance of portions of Highland Avenue/19th Street between the City's west city limits and Etiwanda Avenue, the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Marbella Drive, Alta Loma Drive from Revere Avenue to Haven Avenue, portions of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue, and portions of Summit Avenue and Cherry Avenue 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign said Resolution and direct the City Clerk to attest the same. STATE OF CAL IFORNl& RIGHT OF WAY MAPS OF STATE HIGHWAY IN SAN ~ERNARDINO COUNTY ALON~ HIGHLAND AVENUE AND 19TH STREET. BETWEEN RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY LIMITS AND ETIWANDA AVENUE. ( ~~.. ALONG ALTA LOMA DRIVE BETWEEN REVERE AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE AND AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARBELLA DRIVE AND LEMON AVENUE. ~'~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO c~Y or ,~,c,o CUCA~ SEE SEE SEE DET~I ~ 'JO `m DETAIL "D"~ DETAIL "B" ~HEET 3 ~ , SHEETi2 ~ -SHEET 2 . DETAIL "E"-- SHEET 4 T I N VICINITY MAP OF PROPOSED RELINQUISHMENT TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA \, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Gu **' X . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DETAIL "A" ~i~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ]__. -~- ,._~ ~_.a,~'. -. ~ '~g.g~-~--~-~-~- .... ~.~;~,~,.I~ ~X~'~X~X~X~XXX DETAIL "C" FOR TNE ~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DETAIL "~" COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD~NO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RELINQUISHMENT FOR THE CITY OF HANCHO CUOAMONGA DETAIL "E" PROPOSED RELINGUISHMENT FOR ?NE CIIY OF RANCHO OUCAMONGA T. J N. '~'s[¢T,~7 ~.z9 O.~.i~. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~/~,_~.~_c,z_ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO BETAIL "F" PROPOSED RELINQUISHMENT ~OR THE OIlY OP RANCHO OUCAMONGA OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAPS OF SECTION 23 STATE HIGHWAY ~SEEsD.~T'L~"^" IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ALONG VARIOUS ~ cZ~L~Aw~ ~ i~.,~,~;~"~'~J~;~ ,,~. PORTIONS OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND CHERRY AVENUE. ~'/~S~T SEE oET,,~ ,,~,,~ sm cou,T~ · SHEET ~ X ~ g/ CiTY OF FONTANA t i } SECTION 26 SECTmON 25 ~ ' [[ V VICINITY MAP OF P.OPOGED v ~ RELINQUISHMENT TO THE CITY SECTION 34 % OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRACT MAP NO, 14276-2 TRACT MAP ND. DETAIL "A" RANCNO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1',-6o' " IL "B" PROPO$1=O RELINQOISflMENT TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RIGHT OF WAY MAPS OF . . · ' ............ STATE HIGHWAY G.~TG ~ IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ALONG CHICKASAW ROAO, / . I S[CT*~ ze j C I TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INO RELINQUISHMENT TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO : ~,~,t~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~:~:' . DETAIL "A" PROPOSED RELINGUI~HMENT ~_ FOR THE CITY ~. -~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A [~NGIN EEI~IN G DEPAI~TI~EN T Staff Report DATE: February fi, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND HILLSIDE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY PRESTIGE HOMES, L.P., AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 18, 1989, FROM J.C.R. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the new Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, releasing the previous Improvement Agreement and Securities and authorizing the Finance Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Map, Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 10246, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Hillside Road, was approved by the City Council on May 20, 1987. This project is for the construction of 15 lots on 7.5 acres of land.. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00772 February 5, 2003 Page 2 The property has been purchased by Prestige Homes, L.P., who is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $388,900.00 Labor and Material Bond: $194,450.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit: $ 3,150.00 The above-mentioned securities shall replace the securities submitted by the previous developer, J.C.R. Development Company Partnership, and accepted by City Council on October 18, 1989. By process of this agreement, Prestige Homes, L.P., as new developer, has responsibility of the project. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachments ,51TE !~ ' 7 " WILSON ,,~,¥'E ]> N CITY OF rr~: ~~~~~*~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. ~"~ - ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING · IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 18, 1989 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on Febmary 5, 2003, by Prestige Homes, L.P., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Hillside Road and release of the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for J.C.R. Development Company Partnership; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, TI-IEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI:t~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from J.C.R. Development Company Partnership are released. RESOLUTION NO. ~),,~ ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIlD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the '°Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Tenftory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) February 5, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Tenitory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Tendtory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: PRESTIGE HOMES, L.P. The legal description of the Property is: LOTS 1 Tltl~OUGH 15 OF TRACT 10246, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP FII .ED IN BOOK 199, PAGES 60 AND 61 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 LMID HILLSIDE ROAD Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but ~ather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 7 ............ SLD # 2 7 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 1 7581 ...... 78 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel S 1 S 2 L 1 15 15 15 15 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7573 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Multi- Parcel 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 Family Comm/Ind Parcel 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $972,907.71 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property - DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) is: 15 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $1,383.15 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per ~ssessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. i (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and Il'se lInit Tyne llnit~ Ilnit~ Factnr ITnit~ Il'nit Rev~nu~ Single Family Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Family Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property - DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) is: 15 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $266.55 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l~and ll~e llnit Tyne llnit~ I lnits Factor 1 lnit~ llnit Revenue Single Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00 Family The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property - DRC2001-00772 (TRACT 10246) is: 15 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $599.55 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT $ Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15732, LOCATED.AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CENTER AVENUE AND DORSET STREET, SUBMITTED BY W.F. CONSTRUCTION, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15732, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the City Clerk and the City Engineer to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15732, located at the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Dorset Street, in the Industrial District (Subarea 17) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 27, 2002, for the division of 2.71 acres into three parcels. The Developer, W.F. Construction, Inc., previously submitted (City Council July 17, 2002) an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $11,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 5,650.00 These bonds were included with the agreement and security for DRC2002-00570 approved by City Council on July 17, 2002. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PM 15732 February 5, 2003 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MNB:sc Attachments N.T.S. City of Rancho CucamonRa RESOLUnON NO. $- t9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 15732 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15732, submitted by W.F. Construction, Inc. and consisting of three parcels, located at the southeast comer of Center Avenue and Dorset Street, being a division of Tract 11428, Lot 11, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 27, 2002, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15732 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map No. 15732 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 7/ RESOLUTION NO. 0,~ - ~,'~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15732 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also pmvide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions,, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIlD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all oftbe procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PM 154732 February 5, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: THE FOX FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 12, 1999 AND THE WILKINS FAMll .Y TRUST DATED DECEMBER 7, 1999 The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15732, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LOT 11 OF TRACT NO. 11428, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 158 OF MAPS, PAGES 19, 20 AND 21, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B S?RE~T LI~O___HT?__O. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND I_£~£ND ST. I (Dr~C~oo)-oos7o) I l I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTil COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (DRC~OOI-OOY7~ STATE OF CALIFO~IA _ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that am maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on corrmaercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit "B" continues Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: PM 15732 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 ............... SLD#6 6 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 3B --- ...... 17 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B N/A 3.01 6.02 3.01 3.01 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commerci al/Indus trial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment· Assessment Assessment l.and ll.~e llnit Tyne U'nit~ ll.nit~ Factor I l.nit~ Il'nil' R evenne Comm/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15732) is: 2.71 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U.: $956.09 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l.and line Ii'nil Tyne 1 lnita Unita Factnr Nnit~ Ilnit Revenue · Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15732) is: 2.71 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $96.31 Annual Assessment c-1 Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l .and Tlge lInit Tyne Ilnit~ lTnit~ Factor l~nits Il'nit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15732) is: 2.71 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $139.29 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ NGINI]I~I~IN C DEP^D"t~ENT Staff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP FOR PARCEL MAP 15790, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF HYSSOP DRIVE, EAST OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY, SUBMITTED BY ERIN MADISON, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 15790 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15790, located on the east side of the southern terminus of Hyssop Drive, east of the 1-15 Freeway, in Subarea 14 of the General Industrial District, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 8, 2002, for the division of 2.3 acres into two parcels. The Developer, Erin Madison, Inc., submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $16,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 8,400.00 Monumentation Security (Cash) $ 2,500.00 The Developer also submitted signed Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6. City Council approved the Agreement and Improvement Security and ordered the annexations to the Maintenance Districts on September 4, 2002. This was included as CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 15790 February 5, 2003 Page 2 part of the approval of the Development Review No. DRC2001-00719 on Parcels 1 and 2 of this Parcel Map. C.C. & R's have been approved by the City Attorney. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:sc Attachments ' '~ ' VICINITY MAP PARCEL ~AP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i-'~ RESOLUTION NO. (~),~- ~, 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15790 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15790, submitted by Erin Madison, Inc., and consisting of two parcels, located on the east side of the southern terminus of Hyssop Drive, east of the 1-15 Freeway, being a division of 2.3 acres into two parcels in the Subarea 14 of the General Industrial District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on the 8th day of May, 2002, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15790 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by Erin Madison, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Parcel Map No. 15790 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ ~ G I N I~I~I~IN G D ~ PA~ TI~I~N T DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY /SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE CARNELIAN STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $3,200,000 FROM FUND BALANCE INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1112303- 5650/1450112-0 AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE THE RELATED REIMBURSEMENT INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1112000-4745 (INTERGOVERNMENTAL REIMBURSEMENT) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Cooperative Agreement between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority/San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cueamonga, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the Carnelian Street Storm Drain Improvements, and appropriate $3,200,000 from fund balance into account no. 1112303-5650/1450112-0 and authorization to receive the related reimbursement into account no. 1112000-4745 (intergovernmental reimbursement). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Carnelian Street Storm Drain Improvements from the existing storm drain just north of Cucamonga Creek Channel to the newly installed storm drain by SANBAG for the Route 210/30 Freeway just south of 19th Street is necessary to mitigate an existing inadequacy in the outlet structures for the SANBAG installed portion which protects the 210 freeway. Also, the improvements will greatly reduce surface flow along Carnelian Street. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Cooperative Agreement-Carnelian Street Storm Drain February 5, 2003 Page 2 It is essential that the storm drain improvements be constructed prior to the winter of 2003/2004 in order to limit the liability exposure of Caltrans. Plus, the storm drain improvements will eliminate the need for SANBAG to spend approximately $150,000 in "throw-away" improvements. The Cooperative Agreement states that the City will pay the contractor progress payments for the work from City funds, then the City will bill SANBAG for that amount up to $3,200,000, then the City will reimburse SANBAG yearly 50% of the General City drainage funds collected the past year until the total amount advanced by SANBAG is repaid. A copy of the Cooperative Agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Willi~_m.~. O'Neil . City Efigineer WJO:JAD:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution (Cooperative Agreement) ONTARIO CI~ LIMIT ~ROJ~CT LOCATION ~0~ ~ ~RO~ VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. ~)~- ~),'~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY /SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE CARNELIAN STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Cooperative Agreement between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority/San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Carnelian Street Storm Drain Improvements from the existing storm drain just north of Cucamonga Creek Channel to the newly installed storm drain by SANBAG for the Route 210/30 Freeway just south of 19th Street; and WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement covers the funding and reimbursement of funding for the construction of the storm drain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Cooperative Agreement be hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Cooperative Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A $ Repo DATE: February 5, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECI': ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR iMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00345, SUBMI'i-I'ED BY THE GARDENS, LOCATED AT 7576 ETIWANDA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2001-00345 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2001-00345, located at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: The Gardens 7576 Etiwanda Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Release: Faithful Performance Bond DRC2001-00345 $34,500.00 Accept: 10%Warranty Bond B34228670 $ 3,450.00 .~,espeqtfully submitted, ' Vl~JJia~n J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~)~,~- ~),~ Zj/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00345 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00345, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. R A C H O C U C A M O N ~, A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DA3E: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer)g SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 13759, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SUBMITTED BY FORECAST GROUP, L.P. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 13759, located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, submitted by Forecast Group, L.P. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: Maintenance Bond: 025072 $132,600.00 (Overland Homes, LLC) Developer: Forecast Group, L.P. 10670 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Respectfully submitted, Will~m O. O'Noil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is 9/ R A N H O C U C A M O N G A E NGIN EI~I~INC DI~DAI~TFII~N~ Staff Rel:x rt DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 14207, LOCATED ON WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF BERYL AND SOUTH OF HERITAGE PARK, SUBMITTED BY H & W CONCORDIA R-28, LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14207, located on Wilson Avenue, west of Beryl and south of Heritage Park, submitted by H & W Concordia R-28, LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: H & W Concordia R-28, LLC 1131 West Sixth Street Ontario, CA 91762 Respectfully submitted, - City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments ,4 ~-.J ~ L -1 ',.ll~-~ll* II IL_Ii'--Ii,h%, ~F__ ·' 1-210 ,,J ~L~-~moL !~ II , -win _._ '~ ~TN 5T R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: .RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR PARCEL MAP 15155, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 15155, located on the northwest comer of Jersey Boulevard and White Oak Avenue, submitted by Master Development Corporation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Master Development Corporation 3991 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 215 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Resl;~tully submitted, Will~Nei~l"~-'Z''~? City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department PARCEL MAP 15155 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND WHITE OAK AVENUE ARROW ROUT ~ ~ · JERSEY BL'V~. ~ ME"ffiOMNK ~ClNITY MAP NORTH R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E NO IN E E,RI N G D E PAR T~IE N T StalWart DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer'~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15282, SUBMITTED BY S & D RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN ASPEN AND SPRUCE STREETS RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Pamel Map 15282 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materialmen Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15282, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between Aspen and Spruce Streets, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance and Labor and Materialmen Bonds. Developer: S & D Rancho Cucamonga California, LTD, a Texas Limited Partnership 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1120 Addison, TX 75001 Release; Faithful Performance Bond 815591S $82,000.00 Labor and Materialmen Bond 815591S $41,000.00 ,Respec~tfully submitted, · w~ffian)/J. O"N eil ---- CP~Ehgineer PROJECT SiTE ~,~ RED OAK ST UR ~ ""' CIVIC CENTER DRIYE , ARROW ROUTE VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ClrTY OF ~ STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1'm~'~. ',/~Clk~VT¥ ~^P RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15282 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 15282, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A C H O C U C A M O N G A 1~ N G I N EI~I~I N G D E PAl2 T~ E N T DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 15526, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15526, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View, submitted by Lewis Development Company. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Lewis Development Company 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Respectfully submitted, Willi 'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is VICINITY MAP TRACT 15526 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ ~ ~Tr~~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff:Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 15726, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE AT PHILLIPS WAY, SUBMITTED BY DPCD RANCHO 45/LTD RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15726, located on the south side of Lemon Avenue at Phillips Way, submitted by DPCD Rancho 45/Ltd. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: DPCD Rancho45/Ltd 8300 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Respectfully submitted, William J. 0 Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department TRACT 15726 BANYON ~. LEMON AVE. h lffrH CT LOCATION NORTH THE CITY OF ]~^g Cfi 0 C U C^ H 0 N GA DATE: February 5, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECr: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AND FII.E A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS RECOMMENDATION The sand replacement project at various city parks has been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said project improvement and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $97,800.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, the bids for the Playground Sand Replacement at Various City Parks project were received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, K C E Company. The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Playground Sand Replacement at Various City Parks by: CONTRACTOR: K C E Company 1846 Woodlawn Street Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape) $97,800.00 R~spectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JB:ju Attachment SO rION r O. O.Y' A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Playground Sand Replacement at Various City Parks have been completed to the-satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I~ a N C h O C U C A M O N G a ~i~CINEI~!~IN C DEPAI~T~IEi~T $ affReport DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering T~chnician'~[¢ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 441-000-470 IN THE AMOUNT OF $163,600.00, FOR THE WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-048 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 441-000-470 in the amount of $163,600.00 for the Wilson Avenue Landscape Improvements from San Sevaine Road to Cherry Avenue, Contract No. 01-048. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the landscape improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: DMS Landscape Services 234 E. Foothill Blvd. Azusa, CA 91702 R e ,~ae'-~ Ily submitted, Willia~/J. O' N-'eil City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is Attachments · VICINITY MAP WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE PROJECT --~ LOCATION ~. ~ ~ ~.~,~ ~i ~ .~...~ . ~.~ .=._ construction) 19th S hl~d Ay Base EXHIBIT "A" R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DA~E: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer,,..}~.....- Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~an ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 02-032 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $24,245.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, Contract No. 02-032, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $24,245.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $2,424.50, 35 days after acceptance. Aisc, approve the final contract amount of $24,245.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $24,245.00, which included no contract change orders. The original amount approved by Council was $26,669.50 ($24,245.00 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:J'FH/RO:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. (~) ,,~° ~)~' 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BANYAN STREET AND FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 02- 032 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, Contract No. 02-032, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPAR?MENT StaffRe rt DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FFK3fvl: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer~.~. Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~an~ SUI~IECT: ACCEPT THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 02-033 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $34,333.08 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, Contract No. 02-033, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Pedormance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $33,737.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $3,433.31, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $34,333.08. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $34,333.08, which included one contract change order resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 1.77%. The original amount approved by Council was $37,110.70 ($33,737.00 plus 10%). City Engineer WJO:dTH/FtO:Is Attachments /// Figure "A" Carnelian, LaVine and LaGrande Traffic Signal Project ~°~ RESOLUTION NO. ~),.'1'- ~).~ ~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 02-033 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, Contract No. 02-033, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. StaffRelmrt DATE: February 5, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Associate Engineer SUBJECt: ACCEPT THE ADULT SPORTS PARK AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AS COMPLETE, AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AU'rHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO RELEASE THE LABOR MATERIAL BOND AND RELEASE THE 10% RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER RECORDING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION BY THE COUNTY RECORDER, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $202,460.00 LESS 10% RETENTION; AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 TO INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1120305-5650/1209-120-0 ($10,000.00) AND ACCOUNT NO. 1025001-5602 ($18,000.00) AND AUTHORIZE, FINAL PAYMENT AFI'ER 30 DAYS. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Adult Sports Park and Parking Lot improvements project, as complete, authorized release of the Faithful Performance Bond, authorized the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, authorize the City Engineer to release the Labor Material bond and release the 10% retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion by the County Recorder, approve the final contract amount of $202,460.00 less 10% retention; and approve Change Order Number 1, to International Pavement Solutions, to be funded from Account No. 1120305-5650/1209-120-0 ($10,000.00) and Account No.1025001-5602 ($18,000.00) and authorize Final Payment after 30 days. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action on July 7, 2002, bids were solicited, received and opened on August 13, 2002, for the subject project. During construction it was discovered that retaining wall footings for the ADA ramps for the softball fields could not be constructed in tiered fashion as originally contemplated due to the height of the walls relative to the width of the footings and the proximity of the "switch back" ramps all within a confined space. This necessitated extending the depth of the retaining walls and footings and as a result an increase in the quantity of soil to be CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ADULT SPORTS PARK AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS February 5, 2003 Page 2 excavated for the wall footings. Other ancillary changes included the removal of two trees whose root systems were to close to the retaining wall excavations, the addition of drainage grates to better control runoff and the removal of additional pavement in the parking areas to better match up with the new ADA sidewalk ramps. Credits to the contract resulting in savings of nearly $24,000.00 include the substitution of matching handrail/fencing in place of decorative metal fencing and the elimination of some asphalt removals. The net increase is well with the approved budgeted amount for the project. Re/spec[fully submitted, Will/dm J. O'Neil City Engineer WdO:DB RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ADULT SPORTS PARK AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTRACT NO. 02- 100) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, 'the construction of public improvements for the Adult Sports Park and Parking Lot Improvements (Contract No. 02-100), has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO._~7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMI'I-~'ED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 02-124, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On January 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds ~hat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on January 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council herebyspecifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City, primarily on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway and a small area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the information provided in Part I and II of the Initial Study for this application that did not find any significant environmental impacts would result from the application proposal. c. 'Fhis amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development by being located in the General Commercial General Plan land use designation which specifies a "wide range of community commercial and regionally-oriented businesses" within the land use designation; and CII'Y COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 15, 2003 Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by complying with the intent of the Regional Related Commercial designation by providing complementary uses and development standards; and e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as evidenced by the environmental analysis in Part I and II of the Initial Study for this application which determined that no significant impacts would results from this application; and f. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code by protecting and promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare through the City's environmental and design review procedures as provided in the Initial Study and application report analysis; and g. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the Regional Related Commercial designation is an accepted zone within the General Commercial General Plan land use designation and the Mixed Use Public Storage use advances the intent of the zone by adding to the wide-range of commercial activities. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission and City Council during the public hearings, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 4: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures (additions in bold print), to allow subject to a conditional use permit, Mixed Use Public Storage in Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, by amending Table 17.32.030 and adding footnote #5, as written below: //4 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Janua~ 15,2003 Page 3 IRETAILCOMMERCIAL USES I Subarea One I Subarea Two I Subarea Three I Subarea Four Mixed Use Public Storage lac ° "" P jsc cc ° M" 'jsc cc °° M" u MUlCC OI I Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b (footnote 2). 2 All industrial usus and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. 3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. 4 Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. Thfs provision is intended b3 facilitate the development of large, regionally relateq uses. Regionally Relateq Commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significanlty larger than these businesses which drew customers primarily from the neighborhood or co~'nmuni~ level. $ Public Storage may be located In the RRC district only within an enclosed building. No outdoor storage is permitted. The public storage use may occupy a portion of an existing retail building provided the building is at least $1),000 square feet, · the public storage use does not occupy the first 160 foot depth of storefront leasable arse~ and the public storage use does not occupy more than 5g percent of the ground floor of the building. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision er legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533, A REQUEST TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE D BETWEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND CHURCH STREET; AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. KB HOME and Lewis Operating Corp. jointly filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred tO as "the application." ' 2. On the 23rd day of October 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 15th day of January 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing on January 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property within Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002o00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. January 15,2003 Page 2 a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, this Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in.compliance with lhe California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQ^ guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of this Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the facts associated with the proposed project, no significant adveme environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, this Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to this Council during the public hearing, the Council hereby rebuts the.presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. 12-1. ~ " LAND USE AMENDMENT ~ MAJOR GREENWA¥ i SYSTEM m, eeee MMOR GREENWA ~;~ MMOR GREENWAY R~ISED T~IL ALIGNMENT ' Park and Greenway System ~,~*.D THE CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAHONCA Staff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Pumhasing Manager SUBJECT: 2003 AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution, which will establish and/or adjust certain fees City Clerk, Community Services, and Planning. Any fee model is based on a comparison of use, participation and attendance reflective of actual cost. It is analyzed and updated annually. Please see summary schedule for new fees and services. Other fees and services remain unchanged. Also, fee changes and additions are noted in blue, deletions are notes in red for your review. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachment H:\Comp Fee Study\COMP FEE SCH STAFF RRT 2003.doc RESOLUTION NO. 03-}~C~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPART- MENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 03-XXX A. RECITALS. ' (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oral or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (iii) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on Monday, January 27, 2003 (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are established: SECTION 1: BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES 1.0 Buildinq Permit Fees A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work Fees $1 .oo to $1,000.°° ................................ $25.® $1,001.OOto$2,000.® .......................... $25.oo for the first $1,000.00 plus $2.o0 for each additional $100.oo or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.°° Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 2 of 51 Total Valuation of Work Fees $2,001.o0to$25,000.o0 ........................ $45.® for the first $2,000.® plus $7.s° for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.® $25,001.o0to$50,000.o0 ...................... $217.o0 for the first $25,000.® plus $5.o0 for each additional $1,000.® of fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.®. $50,001.o0to$100,000.o0 .................... $355.00 for the first $50,000.® plus $4.® for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.o0. $100,001.°° and over ........................... $555.o0 for the first $100,000.o0 plus $2.o0 for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof. 1.1 Plan Review Fees (a) When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of plan submittal. (b) Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein. (c) Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein. (d) Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the following schedule: Resolution No. 02-023 Page 3 of 51 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 100 yards .................. $50.® 101 500 yards ............... $100.® 501 1,000 yards ............... $200.oo 1,001 2,000 yards ............... $250.00 2,001 3,000 yards ............... $300.oo 3,001 4,000 yards ............... $350.® 4,001 5,000 yards ............... $400.® 5,001 10,000 yards ............... $500.® 10,001 50,000 yards ............... $600.® 50,00 100,000 yards ............... $700.00 100,001 yards and up ............... $900.® The sum of Cut and Fill Yardage shall be used in computing Grading Permit and Plan Checking Fees. (e) Repetitive plan ol~eoKing of production tract homes that have been previously plan checked and approved under adopted codes may have the plan check fees reduced by 50% (fifty pement). This will only apply to plans when the Design Architect submits a letter with his/her wet stamp and signature certifying that plans are identical to the previously approved plans. The new plans shall be wet stamped with a signature of the Design Architect. (f) Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.® per hour for the estimated time of checking revisions. 1 .._~2Compliance Inspections/Re-inspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice ................................................................................... $30.oo 1,3 Change of Occupancy Change of Occupancy Inspection ........................................................ $50.00 1.4 Relocated Buildings Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or within the City shall be $100.0o when located within 25 miles of~City offices, plus $2.® per mile, round trip, when located more than 25 miles from City offices. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 4 of 51 1 .._~5Appeal of Abatement Notice An appeal of a Notice to Abate a substandard or dangerous - build ng ......................................................... $100® 1.6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary Occupancy nspect on ......................................... $30 ® 1.7 Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours (Minimum charge, four hours) .................................................. $50.® hourly 1._~8 Inspections for Which No Permit Fee Is Specifically Indicated (Minimum charge, one-half hour) ............................................. $50.oo hourly 1..~9 Electrical Permit Fees (a) Permit Issuance For issuing each permit ..................................................... $15.® For issuing each supplemental ' 50 permit ................................ $ 4. (b) System Fee Schedule NOTE: The fo/lowing are in addition to permit - issuing fee. New Residential Buildings: The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot ......................................................... $ .035 For new garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential building per square foot .................................... $ .02 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the Unit Fee Schedule. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 5 of 51 Private Swimming Pools, Spas: For new private residential, permanently installed spas, hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch cimuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each ............................ $30.® For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNiT FEE SCHEDULE. Carnivals and Circuses: Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, Each ................................................................................... $15.® For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, Each ..................................................................................... $4.5o For a system of area and booth lighting, each .................... $4.5o For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Services: For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each ....................................................... $18.5o For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 · 50 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating, each ...........................$37. For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating, each ...................................................................................... $75.® Temporary Power Service: For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each ........................................ $15.o0 Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 6 of 51 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each ................................................................. $7.5o (c) Unit Fee Schedule: NOTE: The fo/lowing are in addition to permit issuing fee. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets: For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each ..................................... $ .75 Additional outlets, each ....................................................... $ .45 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures: For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices. First 20, each ........................................................ $ .75 Additional fixtures, each ...................................................... $ .45 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each .......... $ .75 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each.... $ .75 Residential Appliances: For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter- mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor- operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each ...................................................................................... $3.°° NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 7 of 51 Non-Residential Appliances: For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory- wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases, drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each .......... $3.® NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus: For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or · baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt- amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each ................................................. $3.® Over I and not over 10, each .............................................. $7.00 Over 10 and not over 50, each .......................................... $15.® Over 50 and not over 100, each ........................................ $30.® Over 100, each .................................................................. $45.00 NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Busways: For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof ................................................................. $4.00 NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees: For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch c;rcuit, each .............................. $15. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 8 of 51 For additional branch cimuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each ............................ $3.® Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors: For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth ................................................................... $1 1 .o0 NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more sen/ices, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. 1.10 Plumbin,q Permits (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $1 5.00 For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.50 (b).Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above) For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and back protection therefore) .................................................... $6.® For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer ....... $15.® Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) ..................$6.® For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ $22.5o For each private sewage disposal system ........................ $45.50 For each water heater and/or vent ...................................... $7.~° For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps .................$1 2.® For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each ................................ $3.o0 For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture ........................................................................... $3.o0 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including back flow protection devices therefore ................ $9.0o For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler system: 1 to 5 ....; ............................................................. $7.5o Over 5, each ....................................................... $1.5o Resolution No. 02-023 Page 9 of 51 For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller .......................................... $7.00 Over 2 inches ................................................... $1 5.00 For each gas piping system of one to four outlets .............. $3.00 For each gas piping system of five or more, per outlet ...... $ .75 Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not including gas piping) ................................................... $1 0.00 1.11 Mechanical Permits A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $1 5.00 For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.~° (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fees above) For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h ....................................................................... $9.oo For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ................................................................................... $1 1.00 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent ....................................................................... $9,oo For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater ................................................................................... $9.o0 For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit ................................................................... $4,s° For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code ........................................ $9,00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h ..................................................................................... $9'°° Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 10 of 51 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h ....................... $16.5o For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h ............................ $22.5o For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h ........... $33.5o For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h ................. $56.® For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto ................................................................................. $6.5o NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is an integral portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm ....................... $11 .oo For each evaporative cooler other than portable type ........ $6.5o For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct ............ $4.~° For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit ................................................................................ $6.5o For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood ..................................................................................... $6.5o For the installation or relocation of each domestic~ type incinerator .................................................................. $11.00 For the installation or relocation of each commercial industrial-type incinerator ................................................... $45.® For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code ........................................................... ~ .......................... $6.5o Resolution No. 02-023 Page 11 of 51 1.12 Permit Fees A fee for each Grading Permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 cubic yards or less ........................ $15.00 51 to 100 cubic yards ......................... $22.~° 101 to 1,000 cubic yards .................... $22.00 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.~° for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards .............. $117.0o for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to l00,000cubicyards ..........$198.0o for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.~° for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 12 of 51 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 100,001 cubic yards or more ............. $562.5° for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.~° for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1.13 Application for Plan Duplication Application for duplication processing .................................................. $50.~ SECTION 2: BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Fees for Business Licenses are found within Title 5 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16, thereof. SECTION 3: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES 3.1 Municipal Code Municipal Code .................................................................................. $150.® Supplements to the Municipal Code will vary in cost and will be billed accordingly ....................................................................... ........................................................................... Amount Variable Binder- Printed Hardcover for Municipal code .............................. $50.® (Additional covers) 3.2 Passport- Miscellaneous Application Processing Fee ................................. $30.® per application Photos ............................................................... $12.® per set of two photos Resolution No. 02-023 Page 13 of 51 SECTION 4: COPYING RATES~ MEDIA AND SUBSCRIPTION FEES ALI DEPARTMENTS Fee Activity Fees Photocopies ....................................... $ .25 per page* Campaign and Economic Interest Statement Retrieval Fee .............................. $5.® per request Campaign and Economic Interest Statement Retrieval Fee .............................. $ .10 per request Microfilming ........................................ $ .25 per page* Map~Plan Reproductions $3.® per sheet/per plan page Microfiche Jackets ............................. $1.00 per sheet Audio Tape ......................................... $1 0.00 per tape Video Tape ......................................... $1 0.00 per tape Computer Diskettes ........................... $1 0.00 per diskette Compact Disc ..................................... $10.® per disc Subscriptions Fees Council Agenda .................................. $1 18.® per year Minutes ............................................... $145.00 per year Planning Commission Agenda .......... $ 43.50 per year Minutes ............................................... $160.® per year Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda ............................................... $ 9.® per year Engineering Plans and Specifications per set cost ......................................... Amount Variable Mailing Costs for the above (overnight) ......................................... Amount Variable Map/Plan Reproductions ...................$3.® per sheet FAX Requests - ALL DEPARTMENTS A maximum of 6 pages may be requested .............................. No Fee** *There will be a minimum charge of $1.°° for 1-3 pages ** If material requested is more than 6 pages, material will be mailed and billed at rate established by this Resolution. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 14 of 51 SECTION 5: ENGINEERING FEES 5.1 Applications Fees Certificate of Compliance ................... $1,1 90.® Lot Dne Adjustment ........................... $1,1 90. Amending Map ................................... $1,1 90.00 Reapportionment Map ....................... $600.® A two-sheet ParceJ/Tract Map; $~0.~ for each eddltlonal sheet Street Vacation .................................. $1,156.00 Standard Agreement/Doc. · 00 Processing ......................................... $298. Release of Lien Agreement ............... $298.00 Certificate of Correction ..................... $256.® Flood Hazard Letter ........................... $314.® Bond ' ' 00 Substitution ............................... $420. Private Street Designation ................. $495.® Reimbursement Agreement Storm ' oo Dra~n ........................................ $2,227. Street ' ' ' 00 and Ubhtles .............................. $2,827. Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.) ......................................... $751.0o 5.._~.2 Map and Plan Checking Fees Fees Property Legal Description ................ $584.® Map Checking Residential Parcel Map ...................... $1,370.00 + $180.® per Parcel Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps of 10 lots or less ........... $2,070.® Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps over 10 lots ................... $1,720.00 + $35.® per Parcel or Lot Resolution No. 02-023 Page 15 of 51 5.~3 Improvement Plans Fees Widening of Existing Streets .............. $1.3s per LF + sheet Charge for Interior Streets Interior Streets Fees OO 1-2 Sheets: ......................................... $1,370. per sheet 3-5 Sheets: ......................................... $2,740.00 + $1,200.oo per sheet over 2 sheets 6-10 Sheets: ....................................... $6,340.°° + $1,095.°° per sheet over 5 sheets 11 or More: ......................................... $11,815.0o + $1,025.o0 per sheet over 10 sheets Storm Drain Plans .............................. Same as for Interior Streets Hydroloqy Study Fees Drainage Areas up to 150 Acres ....... $1,370.oo Drainage Areas over 150 Acres ........ $2,740.oo Landscape and Irrigation Plans for City-Maintained Areas .................. $400.oo per sheet For map and plan checking, the fees for rush checking, when approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved plans will be on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.oo. 5.~4 Public Works Construction Permit Fee 5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000.oo, minimum $50? 4.5% of Improvement Cost for next $75,000.00 4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000.oo The Improvement Cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bond and as approved by the City Engineer. A refundable deposit is also required. NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under separate resolutions. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 16 of 51 5.5 Oversize Loads Fees Single Permit* .................................... $15.00 Repetitive Permit*. ............................. $70.00 initial fee + $15.0o per month renewal fee to a maximum of 6 months Annual Permit*. .................................. $70.0o per year * These feesare based on the provisions of the California Vehicle Code Section 35795 and CalTrans Fee Schedule. 5.6 Other Fees Collection of San Bernardino County fees, as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: # Documentary Handling Fee for Filing Notice of Determination # Development Review Fees # County Recording Fee # County Printing Fee .SECTION 6: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Fire Board 6.1 Plans Checkin.q Fees Includes Plan Review and two Inspections. Does NOT include Fee for any required Fire District Permits. A. Start-Up Fee for Commercial, Industrial or Multi-family Dwelling Units, paid prior to TRC.....$82.00 B. Plan Review Fees 1. Single Family Residence ................................................. $132.00 2. Single Family Residential Tract, per Phase .................... $132.00 3. Multi-Family Residential, per Building ............................. $677.0o 4. Commercial and Industrial Development, per Building...$677.00 5. Water Plan/Underground Water Supply ......................... $132.00 6. Conditional Use Permit .................................................... $132.0o 7. Minor Development Review ............................................. $132.00 8. Parcel Map Review .......................................................... $132.00 9. Tenant Improvement; per hour, one hour minimum .......... $87.00 1 0. Special Events Review ...................................................... $87.0o 1 1. Accessory Plans Review: Aisles, Access, Seating, Etc .............................................. $66.00 Resolution No. 02-023 Page 17 of 51 12. Alternate Method Approval ................................................ $92.o0 13. Revision to existing Plan (e.g., As-Builts, Excluding TI Plans) .................................. $92.® 14. New Fire Sprinkler Systems, · 00 Standpipes or over ten heads .......................................... $164. 15. Fire Sprinkler Alteration, ten heads or less ....................... $92.® 16. Pre-Engineered Fire Protection Systems ........................ $147.o0 17. Fire Detection and Alarm Systems .................................. $154.o0 18. Flammable Finishes Spray Booth, per booth .................. $164.® 19. LPG Tank Installation Review, per tank ..........................$147.o0 Underground Storage Tank Removal Review, per tank ............................................................................ $147.o0 21. Flammable & Combustible Liquid, Tank & Piping ........... $147.® 22. Failure to keep Appointment, one hour minimum ............. $66.® 23. Microfilm Charges, per page ............. : ................................. $1 .o0 24. Minor Plan Review not requiring a District Inspection.... No Fee C. Inspection Fees Per hour, one hour minimum 1. Field Inspection required after the Initial · 00 and Follow-Up Inspection ................................................ $110. 2. Failure to keep an Inspection Appointment ....................... $66.o0 3. Field Inspection of Self-Inspection Occupancies, Failure to Comply ............................................................... $66.® · 00 4. Fire Flow Test, W~tness Test ............................................. $87. 5. Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation .................. $66.® 6. Same Day, Short Notice Inspection .................................. $87.® 6.._g2 I. Permit Fees [Initial Permit and subsequent renewal of Permit unless otherwise indicated (e.g. one time only Permit activity)] A.Permits · 00 1. General Use Permit ........................................................... $82. 2. Access Control ................................................................ No Fee 3. Aerosol Products (more than 500 lbs. of Level 2 or 3) ...$131 .o0 4.Aircraft Refueling Vehicles ............................................................................................ $95.o0 5.Aircraft Repair Hangar ............................................................................................ $84.o0 6. Automobile Wrecking Yard ................................................ $82.® 7. Asbestos Removal ........................................................... $132.® 8. Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing involving Flammable F~n~shes ........................................................... $82. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 18 of 51 9. Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas..... NOT PERMITTED 1 0. Carnivals and Fairs (see also 6.2E) ................................ $132.00 11. Cellulose Nitrate Film ......................................................... $82.® 12. Cellulose Nitrate Storage, more than 25 lbs ..................... $84.® 13. Combustible Fiber Storage, more than 100 cubic feet ...... $82.® 14. Combustible Material Storage, more than 2,500 cubic feet .............................................. $115.0o 15. Compressed Gases: a. Corrosive, 200 cubic feet or more .................................$95.00 b. Flammable, 200 cubic feet or more .............................. $84.00 c. Highly Toxic, any amount .............................................. $95.00 d. Inert/Simple Asphyxiant, 6,000 cubic feet or more ....... $85.® e. Irritant, 200 cubic feet or more ...................................... $84.® f. Other Health Hazards, 650 cubic feet or more ............. $84.® g. Oxidizing (includes Oxygen), 504 cubic feet or more...$84.00 h. Pyrephoric, any amount ................................................ $95.® i. Radioactive, anyamount ............................................... $98.® j. Sensitizer, 200 cubic feet or more ................................ $95.00 k. Toxic, any amount ......................................................... $95.® I. Unstable (Reactive), any amount ................................ $132.00 16. Commercial Rubbish-Handling Operations ....................... $84.00 17. Cryogens: a. Corrosive -- Inside, over 1 gallon .................................. $95.00 b. Corrosive -- Outside, over 1 gallon .............................. $95.® c. Flammable -- Inside, over 1 gallon ................................ $84.00 d. Flammable -- Outside, 60 gallons or more ................... $84.0o e. Highly toxic -- Inside, over 1 gallon ............................... $95.00 f. Highly toxic -- Outside, over 1 gallon ............................ $95.00 g. Nonflammable -- Inside, 60 gallons or more ................. $95.00 h. Nonflammable -- Outside, 500 gallons or more ............ $84.® i. Oxidize -- Inside, 50 gallons or more ............................ $84.® j. Oxidizer -- Outside, 50 gallons or more ........................ $84.® 18. Dry Cleaning Plants ......................................................... $132.® 19. Dust-Producing Operations ............................................... $84.® 20. Explosives or Blasting Agents: a. Storage, Manufacture, Process or Sell ........................ $84.® b. Use ............................................................................. $150.00 21. Fire Hydrants and Water-Control Valves, use for other purposes ...................................................... $ 84.® 22. Fire Protection Systems and Equipment, per building... No Fee /qJ Resolution No. 02-023 Page 19 of 51 23. Fireworks: a. Retail Sales ...................................................... NOT PERMITTED b. Aerial Displays (see also 6.2E) .................................... $84.® 24. Flammable or Combustible Liquids: a. Pipeline, to Use, Operate, Repair or modify a Pipeline ....................................... $132.® b. Class I Liquids, more than 5 gallons Inside a Building ......................... $84.o0 c. Class I Liquids, more than 10 gallons Outside a Building ....................$84.® Exceptions to b. & c.: 1. Storage or use of Class I Liquids in Vehicle, Vessel, Aircraft or Equipment Fuel Tanks. 2. Storage or use of Paints, Oils, Varnishes, or Similar Mixtures for Maintenance, Painting or Similar Purposes for less than 30 days. d. Class II or II-A Liquids, more than 25 Gallons Inside a Building ...................... $ 84.® · e. Class II or IlI-A Liquids, more than 60 gallons Outside of a Building ............... $ 84.® f. To remove Class I or II Liquids from an UST by other than Normal Operation ........... $ 95.® g. Installation, Construction, Alteration or Operation where Flammable or Combustible Liquids are Produced, Processed, Transported, Stored, Dispensed or Used in any of the following: Tank Vehicles ........................................................ $95.°° Equipment ............................................................ $105.® Tanks, per tank .................................................... $121.0o Plants ................................................................... $132.o0 Terminals ............................................................. $132.® 'Wells, per well ....................................................... $ 84.o0 Fuel Dispensing Stations (Single and/or Uultil~le Pump Stations) ........................................ $ 95.~ Refineries ............................................................. $132. Distilleries ............................................................. $132.o0 h. Installation, Alteration, Removal, Abandon, Place Temporarily out of Service or otherwise Dispose of a tank which contained Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® i. To change the type of contents in a Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® 25. Fruit Ripening ................................................................... $105.® 26. Fumigation or Thermal insecticidal Fogging ................... $121.0o Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 20 of 51 27. Hazardous Materials: (see also other Permit Sections) For multiple Permits within this Section 25, the Fee will be the total of all related Permits to a maximum of $400.00 or Actual Costs, whichever is greater. a. Caminogens, 10 lbs. or more .................................... $132.® b. Corrosive Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................... $84.® c. Corrosive Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® d. Flammable Solids, 100 lbs. or more ............................ $95.® e. Highly Toxic Liquids and Solids, any amount .............. $95.® f. Irritant Liquids, 55 gallons or more .............................. $84.® g. Irritant Solids, 500 Pbs. or more .................................... $84.® h. Oxidizing Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.00 i. Oxidizing Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more.....~ ......................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.oo Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.00 j. Organic Peroxide Liquids and Solids: Class 1, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, any amount .................................................... $95.00 Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 4, 20 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® k. Other Health Hazards: Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................................... $84.® Solids, 500 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.00 I. Pyrophoric Liquids, anyamount ........ ; ......................... $95.® m. Pyrephoric Solids, any amount .................................... $95.® n. Sensitizer Liquids, 55 gallons or more ........................ $95.® o. Sensitizer Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® p. Toxic Liquids, 10 gallons or more ................................ $95.® q. Toxic Solids, 100 lbs. or more ..................................... $95.® r. Unstable (Reactive) Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132.00 Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.00 Class 2, 5 gallons or more ......................................... $132.0o Class 1, 10 gallons or more ....................................... $132.oo Resolution No. 02-023 Page 21 of 51 s. Unstable (Reactive) Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132.00 Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.°° Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................. $132-°° Class 1,100 lbs. or more ........................................... $132.o0 t. Water-Reactive Liquids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.00 Class 2, 5 gallons or more ........................................... $95.oo Class 1, 10 gallons or more ......................................... $95,oo u. Water-Reactive Solids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.oo Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.oo Class 1,100 lbs. or more ............................................. $95.o0 28. Hazardous Production Materials for H-60ccupancies...$132.00 29. High Piled Combustible Storage ........................................ $99.00 30.Liquefied Petroleum Gases; Store, Use, Handle or Dispense ........................................ $84-oo 31.Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles I oo or Equ pment n Assembly Buildings ............................... $ 05. 32. Lumber Yards ......................................................... $84.o0 33. Magnesium Workings ...................................................... $121.00 34. Mall, Covered (see also 6.211D4) ....................................... $84.oo 35. Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Stations ......................... $100.® 36 Open Burning ............................................. No Fee 37. Organic Coatings ............................................................. $132.00 38.Ovens: Industrial Baking or Drying ................................... $84.oo 39. Pallet Storage ...; ................................................................ $84'°° 40. Places of Assembly: a. A-4 Stadiums, Reviewing Stands and Amusement Park .................... $84.oo b. A-3 Occupant Load of 50 to 299 without a Stage ....... $95.oo c. A-2.1, Occupant Load of 300 or more without a Stage ................................. $147.oo d. A-2 Occupant Load of less than 1000 with a Stage .................................. $169.°° e. A-1 Occupant Load of 1000 or more with a Stage .................................... $225.oo 41. Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (See also 6.2E) .................................................................. $84.oo 42. Radioactive Materials ...................................................... $132.00 43. Refrigeration Equipment .................................................. $115.oo .. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 22 of 51 44. Repair Garages .................................................................. $84.® 45. Spraying or Dipping ........................................................... $84.® 46. Tents, Canopies and Temporary Membrane Structures: a. 201 to 400 square feet ................................................. $84.® b. 401 to 1500 square feet ............................................. $110.® c. 1501 to 15,000 square feet ........................................ $147.® d. 15,001 to 30,000 square feet ..................................... $178.® e. Over 30,000 square feet ............................................ $210.® 47. Tire Storage ..................................................................... $132.® 48. Welding and Cutting Operations ....................................... $ 84.® II. Special Services A. Excessive or Malicious False Alarms causing Response of Fire Apparatus. 1. Response due to "Failure to Notify" the Fire Department when working on or testing Sprinkler or Fire Alarm System. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 2. Malicious False Alarms. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 3. Response Due to Alarm Malfunction. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding to all False Alarms In excess of two (2) False Alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour, minimum charge, 4. Response to False Alarms due to negligence, tampering with the system, construction or modification of the building. $153.°° per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 5. Response to False Alarm by Battalion Chief and/or Fire Inspector. $50.00 per hour with 1/2 hour, minimum charge, C. Response to Fire Setter Incidents (Juvenile or Adult) and E;DUI[] Callouts: Resolution No. 02-023 Page 23 of 51 1. Cost Recovery for Emergency Apparatus responding. $2,s° per minute per piece of Equipment, 2. Cost Recovery for Personnel responding. $ ,83 per minute per Person, 3. Cost Recovery for Battalion Chief or Fire investigator responding. $ .45 per minute. D. Response to mitigate Extended Hazardous Chemical and Material Incidents beyond Normal Service requires (this includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and aimraft crashes). 1. Hazardous Incident, Overhead and Command, per hour. $273.00 per hour per piece of Apparatus 2. Apparatus and Crews assigned to the Incident, per hour. $170.00 per hour per piece of Equipment 3. Specialized Resources - HAZMAT Crews and Equipment. Actual Costs 4. Materials and Supplies used for the Incident. Actual Costs E. Special Activities - Apparatus and Crews assigned to activities that require the services, at Permittees expense, of one or more standby Firefighters. $153.000 per hour per piece of Apparatus $ 30.00 per hour, two-hour minimum per District employee, two-hour minimum charge. F. Accelerant Detection Canine Team, Use of Arson K-9 Team by other Agencies. Fire Scene Examinations: $50.00 per hour, two-hour minimum charge Hourly Travel Rate: $25.00 per hour, one-hour minimum, to and from Search Area Mileage, round trip ................................................. $ .35 mile Administrative Reports ............................... $25.00 per hour Mounted Photographs .......................................... $1 .so each G. Board of Appeals Requiring a Special Meeting ..................................... $245.00 Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 24 of 51 SECTION 7: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FEES Request Fees GIS Data, Digital Format .................... $37.® per hour plus costs of material(s) Plots .............................................. $30.oo CD ROMS ..................................... $1 .oo Diskettes ....................................... $ .30 ZIP Disc ........................................ $10.oo JAZ Disc ....................................... $90.oo 4mm Tape .................................... $29.00 Zoning Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.oo Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" B/W Plan Map (Vicinity) ...... $1 .oo Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" Color Plan Map (Vicinity) .....$5.® General Plan Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.0o Flood Plain Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............. $30.oo Request Fees Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide ....... $25.oo Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Residential...$15.oo Land Available for Potential Development Report- Commercial/Industrial ....................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report- Specific Plan ...................................... $15.o0 Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide 34 X 44" Color, 2 "E" Size Sheets .............................. $50.o0 Special Reports and/or Maps ............ Time and Materials + $500.o0 Deposit Resolution No. 02-023 Page 25 of 51 SECTION 8: LIBRARY FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Library Board of Trustees Fines Fines are based on item rather than patron. For example: A child borrowing adult materials will be assessed an adult overdue fine. Overdue Fine Per Item: Fine Borrowing Thresholds Per Day Maximum 00 00 Adult ............... $ .25 ..................... $1 0 ..................... $5. · 00 Chddren .......... $ .10 ..................... $ 5 ...................... $5.® 00 00 Video .............. $1 ....................... $10 ..................... - ....... Best Seller 00 00 Videos ............ $2 ....................... $1 0 ..................... - ....... DVD ................ $2.00 ...................... $1 0.00 .................... - ....... CD/ROM 00 00 Software ......... $2 ....................... $1 0 ..................... - ....... Magazine ........$ .10 ..................... $1 .oo ..................... . ....... Rental Fees Per Item: Loan Per Item Rental Fee Period Type Limit · 00 V~deo .............. $1 ....................... 7 days ................... 8 video titles, total Business Series Video .............. $2.® ...................... 3 days ................... 8 video titles, total Best Seller Videos ............ $2.00 ...................... 3 days ................... 8 video titles, total DVD ................ $2.oo ......... : ............ 7 days ................... 4 DVD titles, total Best Seller 0o 4 DVD ................ $2 ....................... 3 days ................... DVD titles, total Audio Cassette ......... $ .25/cassette ....... 1 4 days ................. 4 audio cassette titles $2.oo max. CD .................. $ .25 ..................... 14 days ................. 4 CD titles Best Seller CD .................. $ .50 ..................... 14 days ................. 4 CD titles Read Alongs...$ .25/cassette ....... 14 days ................. 4 Read Along titles Best Seller Rental Books..$1 ....................... 7 days ................... 4 books/No Reserves CD/ROM 00 Software ......... $2 ....................... 7 days ................... 4 CD/ROM titles Test/Deposit / Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 26 of 51 Books ............. $20.® Refundable Deposit Charged - Checks Allowed; Credit Card Allowed Fees for Services: Interlibrary Loan ................................. $2.® Reserves ............................................ $ .50 Marketing Library Card ...................... $3.o0 Lost Library Card ............................... $2.® for regular card $3.® for marketing card Collection Fee .................................... $15.® per account Test Monitoring Fee ........................... $10.00 per test session Temporary Card ................................. $ .50 Technology Center: Fee In-house Computer Rental .................$3.® per hour Technology Classes Fe.__~e Internet Basic Searching .................... $15.oo per class Internet Intermediate Searching ........ $15.c° per class Internet Advanced Searching ............ $15.00 per class Printouts: Fee Color ................................................... $ .30 B/W ..................................................... $ .10 Photocopies: Fee Color Photocopies .............................. $ .75 B/VV Photocopies: Coin .................................................... $ .15 Debit Card .......................................... $ .10 Microform Copies ............................... $ .15 Resolution No. 02-023 Page 27 of 51 Research/Business Services: Fee Business Locator Services ................$5.® per business, no charge if business is not located Brief Business Profile ......................... $1 0.00 per business, no charge if business is not located Each additional profile, $6.® Business Lists on Demand ................ $ .05~cents per record, $10.~ minimum On line Data Base Searches ............. Cost of Online Connect Time + $5.00 Lost Materials: Item Item Cost Processin.q Fee Books ............. Odginal Cost .............. + $5.00 Media .............. Original Cost .............. + $6.® Paperback Books ............. O#ginal Cost .............. + $2.~° Magazines ...... $3.® ............................ + $1.00 Dama,qed Materials: Type of Damaqe/Loss Processinq Fee Bar Code Removed ........................... $2.00 Book(s) .............................................. List Cost in Computer Cover Damaged ........................... $5.® Plastic Cover Damaged ............... $2.® Page Torn .................................... $1.00 per page Compact Disc(s) ............................... List Cost in Computer Broken Jewel Case: Singles .......................................... $1 .~o Doubles ........................................ $3.00 Loss of Liner Notes ............................ $5.® Loss of Book/Pamphlets .................... $5.® Video Cassette(s) ............................. List Cost in Computer Shell Replacement ....................... $5.00 Storage Case Damage ................ $5.00 Audio Book(s) ................................. List Cost in Computer Double Case ................................ $5.® 4 Storage Case ............................ $6.® 12 Storage Case ..........................$7.® Cassette Boxes ............................ $1.00 SECTION 9: Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 28 of 51 PLANNING FEES 9.1 Applications Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum set at three times the base fee. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Tentative Tract Map O0 O0 O0 ........................ $2,987 ................ $60. per d/u ....... $8,961. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Conditional Use Permit ........................ $2,921.00 ............... $292.® per acre ...$8,763.00 Development/Design Review- Residential (5 or more) ........................ $2,851.00 ............... $57.® per d/u .......$8,553.® Development/Design Review- Commercial/Industrial ........................ $2,851.00 ............... $285.00 per acre ...$8,553.00 Initial Study .,~ ~ .... ~ ........................ $~25.® .................. ,~=.~. p~ ~.~ ~ .....,~u ~ ~. ........................ $1,000.® ............... $150.® per acre ...$2,500.® General Plan Amendment ........................ $2,866.® ............... $287.00 per acre ...$8,598.00 Specific/Commercial Plan Amendment. * 00 00 ........................ $2,866 ................ $287. per acre ...$8,598.® Development District Amendment* ........................ $2,866.® ............... $287.® per acre ...$8,598.® · Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment. 9.2 Applications Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken up front. Application Deposit Amount EIR Review - Sensitive ....................................... $10,000.00 Development Agreement Review ......................... $5,000.® Mitigation Plan - Complex ..................................... $1,000.® Resolution No. 02-023 Page 29 of 51 Annexation ............................................................ $2,000.® Development Agreement ...................................... $2,000.® New Specific/Community Plan ........................... $10,000.oo EIR Preparation .................................................... $5,000.® Challenge to Environmental Studies ................ $5,000.® 9.3 Other Application Fees Application Fee Dev/Design Review: 4 du's or less ............................................... $1,027.® EIR Review Only ......................................... $2,370.® Hillside Development Review 5 or more du s ............................................. $1,462. Hillside Development Review 4 or less du's .................................................. $244.® Landmark Application .................................... $728.® Residential and Small Business ............. No Fee Landmark Alteration ....................................... $835.® Residential and Small Business ............. No lee Mills Act Application ....................................... $724.oo Residential and Small Business ............. No Fee Minor Development Review ........................... $296.® Minor Exception ............................................. $170.® Minor Time Extension .................................... $136.® Mitigation Plan (Complex) .......................... (See 9.2) Mitigation Plan (Simple) ................................. $719.® Non-Construction CUP .................................. $435.® This is what their matrix indicates on ~"~ On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit on sign current fee. It was NN~ ..$500.00 (refundable deposit) not on your original resolution 002-023 Off-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit on sign ..$500.00 (refundable deposit) Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 30 of 51 Preliminary Review ........................................ $325.® Sign Permit' ....................................................... $51.00 Temporary Use Permit ..................................... $68.® I This is what their ~ matrix indicates Temporary Use Permit Model Home ............. $219.00 on current fee. Temporary Use Hermit Model Home .................... (refundable deposit) $2,000.® Temporary Use Permit Model Home ..... Restoration Deposit.....$5,000.® (refundabte deposit) Tentative Parcel Map .................................. $2,514.® Time ' 00 Extension .............................................. $549. Uniform Sign Program ................................... $580.® Use Determination ......................................... $31 5.00 Va dance ......................................................... $871.00 Variance: 4 du's or less .................................................. $291.00 9.4 Appeal Fees Application Fee Appeal of a City Planner Decision ........... $62.® Appeal of a Commission Decision in (~onnection with an Application ............$126.® Appeal of a Tract Map ............................. $251.00 or Parcel Map 9..._~5 Other Fees Application Fej Pre-application Review (Planning Commission) ............................ $325.® Entertainment Permit ............................... $571 fie Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit ......... $571 Home Occupation Permit ......................... $53.® Large Family Day Care Permit ................ $170.® Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses) ............................................................ . ...... $315.o0 Resolution No. 02-023 Page 31 of 51 Recycling Facilities Permit ....................... $296.oo Status Map Application ............................ $15.G° Trail Easement Vacation .......................... $1,190.oo Tree Removal/New Development ............ $432.o0 Tree Removal/Existing Development .................................................................. $72.oo Land Use Verification Report ................... $25.o0 NOT£:Planning Division Fees for documents, which are individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List. SECTION 10: RECREATION FEES Following are current fees for recreation activities and rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered. Definition of classes of fees by groups. GROUP 1; City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co- sponsored events; other governmental agencies, including public schools serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. GROUP 2; Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which are located and based in the City whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's information night. GROUP 3: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations and churches which have paid management and are located and based in the City. GROUP 4: City resident private party activity; City resident employee organizations; City resident political candidate use for fund reisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. GROUP 5'. City resident commemial, business, profit-making, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. GROUP 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making organizations and churches. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 32 of 51 Neighborhood and Community Park Li.qhted Sports Venue Fees All Rancho Cucamonga based youth sports organizations which are recreation in nature and meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Classes/Workshops/Proqrams Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Non-Resident Charge A $5.00 fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not include one-day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. Facility Rentals Hourly fees for Monday through 5 p.m., Friday use as follows: Fdday, 5 p.m. and later, Saturday, Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. rate. Buildin.q Rentals (Hourly) GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME I 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.00 $8.o0 $25.0o $30.0o $30.o0 Small 5pm-8am & None $12.o0 $12.® $35.0o $40.0o $40.oo Weekends NOTE: Patio at Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center shall be rented only as a small room at 8am-5pm rate. * F---'-';- Two hour minimum charge for large room use on Friday, ~..'.d Saturday and Sunday nights. GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME I · 2 3 4 5 6 Large* 8am-5pm None $12.® $12.0o $40.00 $45.00 $45.0o Large* 5pm-8am & None $20.® $20.0o $50.00 $55.o0 $55.oo Weekends * F_~'..'r- Two hour minimum charge for large room use on Friday, c.'.d Saturday and Sunday nights. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 33 of 51 NOTE: All non-profit community based youth organizations are permitted one free board or membership meeting per month. Room use for registration purposes is also free of charge. Groups who require room use beyond the above criteria are charged the group 2 and 3 building rental houdy fees. Facility Decoratin,q Discount Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations. Kitchen (Hourly) GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $5.00 $5.00 $1 0.00 $1 0.00 $1 5.00 Lions West~ Ceramic Room Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 No hourly fee $50.® $75.® Materials Actual costs Actual cost Actual cost Staff $1 0.00 $1 0.® $1 0.® Cancellation Fee: A cancellation fee for all room rentals shall be assessed as follows: · 14 or more calendar days notice - full refund of all fees · 7-13 working days notice - 50% refund of all fees · 1-6 working days notice - 25% refund of all fees · No notice (no shows) - refund of damage/security deposit only. Overtime Fee: For rentals that go over in time from their rental contract a fee will be assessed equal to staff cost plus rental fee to be calculated at a rate of time-and-a-half. pther Fees: If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.oo per hour for staff time. When a damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. Atthe discretion ofthe Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to eventJrental requirements and the City' s liability exposure Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 34 of 51 Per Day Fees Rental Item Fee Coffee Pot (small) .............................. $5.°° Coffee Pot (large) ............................... $15.oo Copy Service ...................................... $ .05 per page Flip Chart/Easel ................................. $20.o0 Microphone ........................................ $10.® PA System (small) ............................. $40,® Piano* (see Note:) .............................. $25.oo Podium With PA .................................. $40.oo Rental Item Fete Projector/Overhead ............................ $10.oo Projector/Slide .................................... $20.0o Stage (large) ...................................... $50.® Stage (small) ...................................... $20.oo TV. with Video Player ........................ $20.o0 White Board with Easel ...................... $10.oo * The piano Is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost. COMMUNITY AMPHITHEATER The following are rental fees for Amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for Groups 2 and 3. Community Amphitheater Fees GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Stage (Flat Fee) None $25.® $25.® $72.® $80.® $95.oo Staff: Sound Monitor None $10.® $10.® $10.® $10.oo $10.oo (Hourly) Resolution No. 02-023 Page 35 of 51 Equestrian Center Fees - Room Rental (Hourly) * Fees and Charges will be as follows: GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME I 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.00 $8.® $25.00 $30.® $30.oo Small 5pm-8am None $12.® $12.oo $35.® $40.00 $40.oo Daily Snack Bar ** None $5.® $5.00 $10.® $10.00 $15.00 Kitchen GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Annual Shared Storage Fee N/C $75.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Equestrian Center Lights *** 100% Actual Energy Consumption * Includes use of P.A. System. ** A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) *** The small arena will have a coin-metered box for electrical cost recovery. Storage For City Community Centem and Public Facilities, no storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Director. Some City parks may be reserved for use. Rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: Picnic Shelter (Hourly) GROUP SHELTER SIZE I 2 3 4 5 6 Small None $3.® $3.® $5.® $8.® $8.® Large None $5.® $5.0o $8.® $12.® $12.0o Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 36 of 51 Lions West Park Area (Hourly) I 2 3 4 5 6 .Nc.~c $5.~ $5.® $8~.~ $I 2.(~ $! 2.~ Civic Center Courtyard (Hourly) Rental of the Civic Center Courtyard provides renter with use of the Rains Conference Room and the restrooms, c=d c=c st=fl mcmbc;. If addlt!c=c! For each City staff member is-required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour per staff member. When damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. At the discretion of the Community Service Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to the event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. The following are rental fees for the Civic Center Courtyard: GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $20.00 $20.® $50.® $55.® $55.® Street Banner Display Fees Installation/Removal ........................... $75.® per banner Administrative Fee ............................. $50.® If the City becomes involved in creation and preparation of the banner NOTE:Applicant is still responsible for the actual cost of banner (payable in advance). Mobile Recreation Unit Rental Three hours minimal rental $250.00 Each additional hour $50.00/hour Staffing charge Minimum of 2 staff @$10/hr for 30 or less participants Additional staffing will be required for parties over 30 at ratio of 1 staff member per 15 participants. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 37 of 51 Mobile Lift Fees Lift Service ......................................... $300.® Plus the cost of 2-Staff Members for the full time frame of the event. ($10.00 hourly per Staff Member.) NOTE:Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and return the equipment. EPICENTER TOURNAMENT AND LEAGUE FEES Rental Fees (Per Field) .GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 Field Rental* 2 Hours and Less $35.00 $100.® GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 4 Hours and Less $70.00 $200.00 All Day $140.® $265.® Deposit $250.® $400.® Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost * Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event- related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community and Neighborhood Park Leaques and Tournaments Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.® per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 38 of 51 Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues and Tournaments* GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4 ** GROUP 5-6 ** 2 Hours and Less None $20.® $50.® 4 Hours and Less None $35.® $90.oo All Day None $85.® $160.oo * A $5.°° non-resident fee will be assessed per non-resident team per tournament. All other rental fees are still applicable. ** A $200.°° refundable security, damage, cleaning, performance deposit is required. Applicant is required to pay ail event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary .Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-6 Drag and Line* Actual Cost * Drag and Line fees Include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. GROUP1-3 GROUP4-6 Bases* $20.o0 $40.® *Basesare aveilableon~when rentlngthefieldsfora ~urnament. Fee~ basedonperfield, perda~ bas~ subject~ availabilltybyClty. Snack Bar For City-Owned snack bars located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 Seasonal None $450.® N/A Other non-profit groups brin.~ging in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged a flat $300.'~ seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City-Sponsored event. Storaqe For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 Seasonal None $75.°° N/A Resolution No. 02-023 Page 39 of 51 R.C. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER RENTAL FEES -- Athletic Use ONLY Basketball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 2 Houm and Less None $40.® $50.® 4 Hours and Less None $75.® $90.00 6 Hours and Less None $100.® $120.00 GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.® (Hourly) Refundable None $200.00 $200.00 Cleaning/Damage Deposit Racquetball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 3 Hours and Less None $45.® $60.® 6 Hours and Less None $75.00 $90.o0 Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.o0 (Hourly) Refundable None $200.® $200.00 Cleaning/Damage Deposit R.C. Sports Center Teen Center Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 Rental Fee: 2 Hour Minimum None $40.® $50.00 Staff: I Staff, 1-30 Persons None $10.0o $10.0o (Hourly) 2 Staff, 30 + Persons None $20.00 $20.oo (Hourly) Refundable None $200.00 $200.® Cleaning/Damage Deposit EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FEES Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 40 of 51 Stadium Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium Rental $1,500.® per day $2,000.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events b. Sky Box Rental Rate $50.00 per hour $50.00 per hour c. Cafe3 Area Rental Rate $50.® per hour $50.® per hour d. Pavilion Area Rental Rate i. Covered Pavilion $50.® per hour $30.® per hour 3rd Base side ii. Open Pavilion $25.® per hour $15.® per hour 1 st Base side e. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parkinq Lot Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium On-Site Lots i. Rental rates for $500.00 per day $670.o0 per day Parking Lots plus 10% of gross A, B, C ticket sales ii. Rental rates for $250.® per day $ 335.00 per day Parking Lots plus 10% of gross D, E, F ticket sale b. Expanded Parking Lots i. Parking Lot #1 $500.~ $250.00 per day $670.00 per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales ii. Parking Lot #2 $250.(~ $500.00 per day $335.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales iii. Parking Lot #3 $1,500.® per day $2,000.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales OR Resolution No. 02-023 Page 41 of 51 iii. Event Quadrant $250.°° per day $335.00 per day A-F plus 10% of gross ticket sales c. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay event-related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parkinq Fees ** a. Baseball Events Option to charge: $2.® per car; $15.® per bus b. Concerts and Option to charge: $3.oo to $5.® per car; $5.® to Special Events $10.00 VIP per car; $15.oo per bus, depending on event c. Parking Lot Events Option to charge: $2.® to $5.® per car Concessions * a. Food and Beverage 20% of gross sales 10% for non-profit organizations b. Merchandise and 20% of gross sales to be negotiated Novelties (.Books, Novelties, 10% for non-profit organizations Tapes, CD's, Programs, T-Shirts, etc.) Miscellaneous a. Commercial Filming Minimum of $1,000.00 to $4,000.0o per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services b. Commercial Filming Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, in Parking Lot depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services c. Commercial Photograph Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, depending on photography requirements, plus actual costs for City services d. Location Credit Required e. Deposit Minimum of $500.00 to $2,500.® per day, depending upon event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. f. Additional Move-in/ 50% of daily event rental rate Move-Out Days* Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 42 of 51 g. Tent/Canopy Maintenance Minimum of $300.® to $1,000.00 per event Reserve Fee depending upon event/rental requirements. * Based upon the event proposed, the fees shown may be subject to negotiation. * Based on Provisions of Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates apply to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. SECTION 11: RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT FEES Description Fete Fingerprinting ..................................... $1 0.00 per card Criminal Reports ................................ $20.® Traffic Accident Reports .................... $20.00 Traffic Accident Reports - Mail ..........$20.0o Criminal History Letters ..................... $1 5.oo Bicycle License .................................. $3.® Special Event Jobs *. ......................... No FEE Costs Associated with Towing and Releasing Stored or Impounded Vehicles .......... $75.® Repossession Vehicle Release Fee..$15.00 Citation Proof of Correction ** ........... $15.® Copy of citation or other document - Not A Report ...................................... $5.® Deputy Reserve ................................. $31.00 hourly Deputy II ............................................. $57.27 hourly Sergeant ............................................. $64. hourly * There is no fee for special events. However, if security services are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or private security, these fees are separate. ** This fee will not apply to persons residing or working within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or citations issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Police. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 43 of 51 SECTION 12: MISCELLANEOUS FEES Description Fee Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts ........................ $7.so Amendment to Tax Statements for Prepaid Assessments ................. $20.® Description Fete Bingo License ................................... $50.® Industrial Bond Development Bond Application ............................... A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum amount of the proposed bond application and not less than $1,250.00 Dog Licensing .................................... (See Resolution 81-79) Filming Permits: (Note Fire and Police Department Fees) Application Fee (See Planning and Recreation Fees) ....................................................... $129.5o Basic Fee for each day of filming ..$132.5o Business License Tax ........................ $20.o0 Investigation Fee ................................ $110.00 per filming day Fire Department ................................. $100. per hour Massage Establishment Application .$225.0o Renewal ............................................. $111.00 Massage Outcall Service ..................$90.o0 Renewal ............................................. $45.® Massage Technician Application ...... $178.® Renewal ............................................. $90.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Appeal Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code)...$300.oo Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Filing Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code)_.$15.o0 Resolution No. 03-XXX Page 44 of 51 Police Department**. ....................... (See Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department Fees) School Fees ...................................... (See Ordinance Nos. 69-0 and Ordinance No. 74 regarding these fees) Description Fee Solicitor, Non-profit, Identification Badge ........................... $5.oo each Taxicab Driver's Permit Application ..$120.® Renewal ............................................. $60.® Taxicab Service Application .............. $95.oo Renewal ............................................. $45.® *Per Hour for each 3-man piece of equipment. Note Police and Fire Department Fees ** Number end type of personnel Is determined by the Station Commander after reviewing plans for the event Resolution No. 02-023 Page 45 of 51 C. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January 2002. AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on this 16t~ day of January 2002. Executed this 17th day of January 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 02-023 Page 46 of 51 FEE STUDY SECTION 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSEDE FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Passports Application Processing E~ $15.® N/A NEWFEE Fee for the City of Set by Rancho Cucamonga Federal Government Passports Set of 2" X 2" ~ $12.® N/A NEW FEE Polaroid Color Comparable to what ID Photos other cities charge Resolution No. 02-023 Page 47 of 51 FEE STUDY SECTION 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Binder, Printed O $50?o N/A Cost of binder, Municipal Code Hardcover for hardcover, purchased Municipal Code from vendor (Additional covers) Passports Application Processing $15.® $30.® N/A Set by Fee to the City of per application per application Federal/State Rancho Cucamonga Government (Effective as of i . August 19, 2002) Resolution No. 02-023 Page 48 of 51 FEE STUDY SECTION 4 - COPYING RATES, MEDIA AND SUBSCRIPTION FEES - ALL DEPARTMENTS SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Copying Rates Campaign and $. 10 $ .10 N/A Set by Economic Interest per page per page Federal/State Statement Document Government * Copy Fee Copying Rates Campaign and N/A $5?0 N/A Set by Economic Interest Federal/State Statement Document Government * Retrieval Fee Copying Rates Microfilm per $3.o0 N/A N/A Microfilm per Plan Page Plan Page equivalent to Map/Plan Reproductions Cost clarification Copying Rates Computer Diskettes $5.oo $10.o0 N/A Comparable to copy per diskette per diskette fee of other media Copying Rates Compact Disc $5.0o $10.o0 N/A Comparable to copy (Previouslyincluded per disc per disc fee of other media under computer diskettes) Clarification and differentiation from computer diskette * EXCERPT: 81008. CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE (a) Copies shall be provided at a charge not to exceed ten cents ($0.10) per page. In addition, the filing officer may charge a retrieval fee not to exceed five dollars ($5) per request for copies of reports and statements which are five or more years old. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 49 of 51 Community Services Fee Matrix Service Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Percent Change Explanation Building Footnote No change in fee N/A ~ Footnote change to lower the minimum hour rental Rentals structure. Just ' from 4 hours to a 2 hour minimum. Change is (Hourly) requires that rental be more consistent with what surrounding a minimum of 2 communities are doing. Sunday was added to hours, address the increase demand for rental on a day when our facilities are normally closed. Building Rentals Cancellation $0 Varies 100% increase Rental groups are waiting until the last minute to (Hourly) Fee cancel their reservations which impacts facility availability for other renters Building Rentals Overtime Fee $0 Varies 100% increase Renters do not always honor their rental contract (Hourly) of when their use of the facility will be completed. This impacts other renters as well causing staff to have work beyond the hours they were scheduled. Per Day Fees Professional $40 $0 100% decrease Item is no longer available therefore we proposing Lighting Tree to eliminate this fee. or Spot Per Day Fees Staff for $10/hr $0 100% decrease Service is no longer available therefore proposing Lighting to eliminate this fee. Lions West Park , Varies $0 100% decrease Rentals of this park area are not occurring Area (Hourly) therefore, fee is not necessary. Civic Center No change in fee N/A Language change only to clarify facilities provided Courtyard and the fact the staff fee is per person whether staff is a Community Sercies staff member, Engineering staff member or both Mobile Recreation Rental $0 $250/3hr '100% increase Allows for cost recovery for rental of mobile recreation unit. Unit minimum Minimum time of rental required to insure proper $50/each programming to provide quality service. additional Hour. Mobile Recreation Staff with rental $0 $10/staff/hr. 100% increase Minimum of two staff is required for party of 30. Staff ratio for rental over 30 participant level is I staffto 15 Unit participants. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 50 of 51 Community Services Fee- Matrix Service Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Percent Change Explanation Epicenter Multi-field discount $695 $0 100% decrease The multi-field discount did not Tournament the 3 & increase field reservations, League Fees therefore we are proposing to eliminate this fee Epicenter Stadium Expanded Parking $500 $250 50% decrease Fee was incorrectly stated in the Complex Fees lot gl past. Rates for Parking lot gl and Epicenter-Parking #2 were switched in the past. lot Events Epicenter Stadium Expanded Parking $250 $500 100% increase Fee was incorrectly stated in the Complex Fees lot #2 past. Rates for parking Lot gl and Epicenter-Parking #2 were switched in the past Lot Events Epicenter Stadium Concessions No change in fees N/A Added a footnote that provides Complex Fees Additional Move- option/authority to staff to infM0ve-out days negotiate certain items for large- scale community events. Resolution No. 02-023 Page 51 of 51 FEE STUDY SECTION 9 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Applications Initial Study $225.00 plus $22.00 $1,000 Plus $150 per 270% Increase due to SECTION 9.1 per acre, max $675 acre, max $2,500 complexity of special studies required Applications Challenge to 00. $5,000.00 N/A To protect City's SECTION 9.2 Environmental Studies resources in the event of costly environmental challenges Other Application Temporary Use Permit $2000.00 $5,000.00 (refundable 150% Increase in cost to cover Fees Model Home (refundable deposit) deposit) increased demolition & SECTION 9.3 Restoration Deposit construction costs Other Application On-Site Subdivision $500.00 $500.00 (refundable 0% Fees currently collected; Fees sign cash deposit on (refundable deposit) deposit) fee established in 1979, SECTION 9.3 sign inadvertently dropped from fee schedule in 1994 Other Application Off-Site Subdivision $500.00 $500.00 (refundable 0% Fees currently collected; Fees sign cash deposit on (refundable deposit) deposit) fee established in 1979, SECTION 9.3 sign inadvertently dropped from fee schedule in 1994 BLANK PAGES 175- 178 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I~._E D EVE L O P ~I E N T AGENCY Memorandum DATE: January 28, 2003 TO.' Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FORMATION OF CFD 2003-01 The City, with the cooperation of property owners, has been working towards the formation of Community Facilities District 2003-01 (CFD). The CFD is a financing mechanism that will provide the funds to construct public improvements in the area between Foothill Boulevard and future Church Street, and between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The CFD will also benefit several other public agencies including Cai Trans (Foothill Boulevard), Cucamonga County Water District (water and sewer lines), and the Chaffey Joint Union High School and Etiwanda Elementary School Districts (school impact fees). Because of the benefit to these other public agencies, a Joint Construction and Financing Agreement must be adopted by each organization prior to the City Council taking action of the CFD. The Etiwanda Elementary School District recently informed the City they are canceling their meeting in late January when the Agreement was scheduled to be approved. The school district has indicated the Agreement will be rescheduled for a meeting in early February, but not before the City Council's proposed CFD public hearing date on February 5, 2003. Therefore, the City Attorney has advised staff that the City Council public hearing for the proposed CFD will need to be continued. Staff requests the City Council continue the public hearing that was scheduled for February 5, 2003 on the proposed CFD. Staff recommends the Mayor open the public hearing so the Council can hear testimony from individuals that will not be able to attend the February 19th meeting. Following any public comment, staff requests the City Council continue the public hearing to February 19, 2003. If you should have any questions regarding the continuation of the public hearing for CFD 2003-01 please contact me. T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SlaffReport DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.18 REGARDING MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendment to Chapter 9.18 of the Municipal Code making it a violation for urinating or defecating in public. Background Staff has received a request from the Police Department asking us to research with the City Attorney's Office an ordinance making it a violation for someone to urinate or defecate in public. No current statute exists that the Police can use to cite individuals conducting this behavior. The attached ordinance amendment is the result of that research. This type of behavior out in public is abhorrent and poses health risks to the general public. This amendment will provide the Police an enforcement tool to use when they witness this activity. It is recommended that the City Council adopt this amendment. Re~.~ectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 9.18 (Miscellaneous Offenses) of Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new section as follows: "9.18.014 Public urination and defecation prohibited. No person shall urinate or defecate in or upon any public street, sidewalk, alley, park, public building or publicly maintained facility, or in any place open to the public or exposed to public view, except in a toilet, urinal or other receptacle provided in any restroom, bathroom or other facility designed for the sanitary disposal of human waste. This section shall not apply to any person who cannot comply due to disability, age, or a medical condition substantiated by a physician." Section 2. Penalties for violations. Anyperson violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.18.020, "Penalties for violation of chapter." Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or mom sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2002. Mayor 1 I, DEBBIE ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on day of 2002, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Debbie Adams City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga 11231/0001/709521.1 2 T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.24 REGARDING GRAFFITI PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendment to Chapter 8.24 of the Municipal Code pertaining to graffiti prohibition and removal. The attached amendment adds some new and more specific definitions particularly to cover new types of graffiti implements. This amendment also changes some language regarding parent liability for graffiti by their child. The changes reflect changes in the law that have occurred over the past ten years and make our ordinance consistent with state codes. Background Staff has received a request from the Police Department asking us to add some new graffiti implements to our ordinance that were not considered to be graffiti implements ten years ago. Specifically, we have added a section covering glass- etching chemicals. In addition we have taken this opportunity to refine the definitions in the existing ordinance. While conducting this review of the graffiti ordinance, the City Attorney's Office also suggested changing Section 8.24.100. This section held parents and guardians financially liable for the graffiti vandalism caused by their minor children. The proposed amendment still holds parents liable but the language is adjusted to make it consistent with changes in state laws that have taken place since 1993. Page 2 February 5, 2003 CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.24 REGARDING GRAFFITI PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL As this amendment will assist the Police Department in combating graffiti and will make our ordinance consistent with state law, it is recommended that the City Council adopt this amendment. R~,sl~ectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING GRAFFITI PROHIBITION AND REMOVAL The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 8.24.020 (Definitions) o£Chapter 8.24 (Graffiti Prohibition and Removal) o£Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "8.24.020 Definitions. "Aerosol paint container" means any aerosol container which is adapted or made for the purpose of spraying paint or other substance capable of defacing proper~y. "Code enforcement officer" means the city manager or his or her duly authorized representative(s). "Etching substance" means any type of liquid, cream or paste product used to permanently etch glass. Ingredients o£such etching substances may include, but are not limited to, mm~onioJsodium bifluorides and sulfuric acid. "Felt tip marker" means any tipped style marker or similar implement with a tip which is at least one-eighth (1/8) of one inch in width at its broadest width. "Graffiti" means any inscription, word, figure, picture, painting, design, or other defacement that is written, marked, etched, scratched, sprayed, drawn, painted, engraved, pasted, or otherwise affixed to or on any surface, to the extent the same was not authorized in advance by the owner thereo£, or despite advance authorization, is otherwise deemed by the code enforcement officer to be a public nuisance. "Graffiti implement" means an aerosol paint container, a felt tip marker, paint stick or graffiti stick, etching substance, or any other device containing any solution or substance capable of scarring or leaving a visible mark at least one- eighth (1/8) of one inch in width upon any surface. "Paint stick" or "graffiti stick" means any device containing a solid form of paint, chalk, wax, epoxy, or other similar substance capable of being applied to a surface by pressure, and upon application, of leaving a mark at least one-eighth (1/8) of one inch in width." 11231/0001/689642.1 Section 2. Section 8.24.100 (Penalties and Civil Liability of Parents) of Chapter 8.24 (Graffiti Prohibition and Removal) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by replacing subparagraph D with the following text to read as follows: "D. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714.1(b), any parent or legal guardian having custody and control of a minor shall be jointly and severally liable with the minor for any damages resulting from any willful misconduct of the minor which results in the defacement of property by graffiti, and for all attorneys fees and court costs incurred in connection with the civil prosecution of any claim for damages or reimbursement, not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000)." Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or mom sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ., 2002. Mayor I, , City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on day of ., 2002, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the __ day of , 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAINED: ATTEST: City Clerk 11231/0001/689642.1 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COM~IUNIT¥ SERVICES Slaff Report DATE: February 5, 2003 TO-' Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNFTY FOUNDATION'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOUR NEVV APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION: To approve the recommendation of the Community Foundation to appoint Bruce Bowne, Jo Dutton, David Parker and Stan Phelps to the Community Foundation. BACKGROUND: The Community Foundation Board of Directors is in the midst of its Board expansion and development process. Over the past two to three months, the Board has recommended two new members - Michael Arreguin and Timothy Younger who were appointed by the City Council in November of 2002. During the past month the Board of Directors has had discussions with additional prospective members and in separate actions at their January 14th and January 25th meetings took action to recommend four additional members - Bruce Bowne, Jo Dutton, David Parker and Stan Phelps to the Board. Resp~c,,tfully submitted, K6~in McArdt~ - Community Services Director KM/mam T H E. C I T Y 0 F 1;! A N C I1 0 CIiCAHONGA DATE: February 5, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Builer, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: TREE PRESERVATION BACKGROUND: Since 1979 the City of Rancho Cucamonga has had an Ordinance requiring the preservation of healthy trees, including those on private property. The attached handout from the Planning Division briefly explains key provisions of the Ordinance. Also attached is a summary of the history of tree preservation in Rancho Cucamonga. No changes have been made to the Ordinance or the review process since 1986. The last review of the Ordinance occurred in 1991 by a subcommittee of the Environmental Management Commission; however, no changes wbre made. ANALYSIS: Councilman Gutierrez requested this report in response to concerns regarding tree removals in the Etiwanda community where much of the recent development is occurring. The Etiwanda Specific Plan adopted in 1983, calls for preservation of select Eucalyptus windrows and replacement of others with new windrows. Replacement planting is done with a different variety of Eucalyptus tree that is better suited to a residential neighborhood. The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance was amended in 1984 to be consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan policies. Recent tree removals are consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The most frequent questions about tree preservation in Rancho Cucamonga concern the ubiquitous windrows. These windrows are 'Blue Gum' Eucalyptus, which are noted for branch drop, toppling, fire hazard and victim to Borer Beetles and Lerp Psyllid infestation. Most windrows on private property are stressed from lack of proper care (watering, trimming), which exacerbates these problems. Arborists have testified to the City Council that although this particular tree species was an appropriate choice for their original purpose as a windbreak to protect agricultural crops, 'Blue Gum' Eucalyptus trees are poorly suited to development, particularly in proximity to homes. The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance acknowledges this fact by requiring selective windrow preservation and expansion of the windrow system by planting the more appropriate 'Spotted Gum' Eucalyptus species. City Planner Attachments: Trees Handout History of Tree Preservation in Rancho Cucamonga Trees Why are trees protected? Engineering Division con determine whether a tree The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance recognizes behind a sidewalk is a City street tree. For further trees as a valuable natural resource that helps define information about maintenance of street trees, contact the community's character; hence, are worthy of the City Yard at (909) 477-2730. preservation. Trees provide scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade and maintain temperate climate, Can I remove a tree? provide wind buffer, and act as a filter to remove pollution from air. Removal or relocotion of a heritage tree, including those on private property, requires a permit. "Remove" includes any act which will couse a heritage tree to die, What trees are protected? including, but not limited to, acts which inflict damage All "heritage trees" are protected under the City's upon root systems, bark or other parts of tree by fire, ordinance, including those on private property, applicotionoftoxicsubstances, operationofequipment "Heritage trees" means any tree, shrub or plant that or machinery; improper watering; changing natural meets at least one of the following criteria: grade of land by excovation or filling the drip line area around the trunk; or by attachment of signs or artificial 1. Ail eucolyptus windrows; or material piercing the bark of the tree by means of nails, 2. All woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and spikes or other piercing objects. having a single trunk circumference of 15 inches or more, as measured 24 inches from ground level; or DO I need a permit? 3. Multi-trunk tree(s) having a total circumference of 30 inches or more, as measured 24 inches from Yes, removal of heritage trees requires a permit. ground level; or Contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2710 to 4. A stand of trees the nature of which makes each obtain permits prior to removal. Submittal of complete dependent upon the others for survival; or information, including plot plan and photographs will 5. Any other tree as may be deemed historicolly or expedite your permit processing. The Tree Removal culturally significant by the city planner because of Permit application available from the Planning Division size, condition, Iocotion, or aesthetic qualities, lists submittal requirements. For more information about valid reasons for removal and procedures, see Exemptions: Fruit or nut bearing trees, trees in public reverse side of this handout. right-of-way where their removal or relocation is necessary to obtain adequate line-of-sight for motodsts as required by City Engineer, trees which City Engineer has determined will damage existing public improvements, and trees which require maintenance or removal to protect existing electrical power or communication lines or other utility property. What about street trees? Trees within the public right of way are City street trees. Sometimes, particularly where sidewalk is curb adjacent, the street tree may be located behind the sidewalk within a special easement. The Planning or h~PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERWREES.dOC Page1 January 21,2003~ (~ ~ Why can trees be removed? What if tree is dead? The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance lists reasons Healthy trees may appear dead, even when they are whytrees may be considered for removal, such as poor not, such as deciduous trees that lose their leaves in health, weak structure, danger of collapse, damage to winter. The best way to determine the health of a tree is improvements, etc. In reviewing a Tree Removal Permit to contact a professional arborist to inspect tree. Like request, staff must also consider the necessity to people, trees may be injured or sick, such as damaged remove a tree in order to construct improvements, the by fire, insect infestation, or fungus, yet with proper care number of trees in neighborhood, whether the trees are and time return to good health. Again, the services of required to be saved by any plan, condition of approval, an arborist can determine treatment methods. If an or designation as an historic landmark. The Ordinance arborist has determined that the tree is dead, then it states that removal is the last resort. Redesigning may be removed without a permit. planned home improvements to save trees in place is preferred. If design change is infeasible, then relocation ofthetreebytransplantingisthepreferredaltemativeto What about emergencies? removal. An arborist can advise on the feasibility of The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance allows the relocation. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct or City Planner to determine if a tree is in a dangerous Can I pru ne my tree? condition requiring emergency action to remove without a permit. Maintenance of heritage trees on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. Heritage trees may be pruned. Improper pruning can damage or kill More Information trees; therefore, care should be used. The Forest The complete Tree Preservation Ordinance isavailable Service has an excellent web site, complete with online at the City's website: illustrations, devoted to how to prune a tree: http:/hwvw.ci.rancho-cucmamonga.ca.us http:/hNww, na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/howtos/ht_prune/prun Follow the Municipal Code link to Title 19, Chapter 001.htm. Copies are also available from the Planning 19.08. Printed copies of the Municipal Code are also Division. available at the City Library and City Hall. Tree Removal Permit Procedures 1. Is removal request in conjunction with a development application? If NO, then go to question 2. If Yes, follow permit process in Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.070.B.) briefly discussed below. At least 10 days notice to adjoining property owners is required before City can make a decision on permit request. 2. Are more than 5 trees or 50 linear feet of windrow being removed? If No, follow simplified permit process in Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.070.A.). If Yes, follow permit process in Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.070.B.). At least 10 days notice to adjoining property owners is required before City can make a decision on permit request. Where request involves a development application, such as a Tentative Tract Map, Parcel Map, CUP or Development Review, then the Tree Removal Permit request shall be considered by the Planning Commission concurrontly with the development application. h~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER\TREES.dcc Page ~, January 21, 2003 HISTORY OF TREE PRESERVATION IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1978: ORDINANCE #37 1 st Effort 1980: TREE PRESERVATION REPORT Policy Options 1983: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 1986: AMENDMENTS · Development Review Process · Homeowner Applications (5/50' or less) · Heritage Trees · Landmarks · Blue Gum Replacement Policy · Strengthen Fines 1988: BORER BEETLE 1991' ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION 2000: LERP PSYLLID i ,rl l CURRENT TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE INTENT: · NATURALRESOURCE · PROTECTION FROM INDISCRIMINATE CUTTI NG/REMOVAL · PRIVATE PROPERTY · "REASONABLE ECONOMIC ENJOYMENT" · EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS Protect Selected Windrows Supplement Through New Plantings (Spotted Gum) APPLIES TO: · HERITAGE TREES: 1. EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS 2. 15' HEIGHT/15" CIRCUMFERENCE 3. MULTI-TRUNK TREES 30" CIRCUMFERENCE 4. STAND OF TREES DEPENDENT ON EACH OTHER 5. ANY OTHER SIGNIFICANT TREES (HISTORIC LANDMARKS) EXCEPTIONS: · FRUIT/NUT BEARING TREES · LANDSCAPE NURSERIES/FARMS · TREES IN R.O.W. WHERE LINE-OF-SIGHT NEEDED · DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TREE REMOVAL PERMITS: · HISTORICAL LANDMARKS - H.P.C. · DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVALS Concurrent Review Discretionary Approvals Arborist Reports Planning Commission Hearings Conditions/Replacement · HOMEOWNERS (5 TREES/50' OR LESS) Simplified Process REPLACEMENT POLICY: · EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS Grid Pattern Spotted Gum · OTHER HERITAGE TREES Relocation Replacement With Specimen Size lq3 PROTECTION: · CARE · FILLS & CUTS · FENCES, ETC. · WATERING VIOLATIONS: MISDEMEANOR Mountain Lion/Coyote Attacks-Siting9s ® ~V~o~;~tai~'~ L, io¢~ attacks: CO~FIRFaED ® ~¢~ou~tai~a Lio~'~ attack: NOT CO~FtRFCED BUT LIKELY ® Coyote attacks: CONFIRiV[ED I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ U 1 LD I N G AND c~AF E TY $ Revor DATE: January 28, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Trang Huynh, Building and Safe~ Official BY: Mark D. Salazar, Code Enforcement Supe~isor ~: ILLEGAL DUMPING ON NORTH ETIWANDA AVENUE SUMMARY: On December 26, 2002, Code Enforcement received a citizen's request to address items dumped at the north end of Etiwanda Avenue. Additionally, Code Enforcement received a copy of an anonymous letter advising "Etiwanda residents" of the dumping concern and to contact the City for assistance. Code Enforcement inspected the area and discovered items dumped on the City's streets and on the County's land north and east of Etiwanda Avenue. Code Enforcement contacted Public Works to remove the items from the street locations and San Bernardino County Weed Abatement to remove the items from the County's land surrounding the area. Although the reported items have been addressed, dumping still occurs due to easy access into remote locations of the County's land. County Weed Abatement will continue to monitor these locations as an on-going concern and abate the items during regular weed abatement cycles. Code Enforcement's case has been resolved. The Building and Safety Department is working with the Engineering Department to consider options on limiting access into the County's land from City streets. BACKGROUND: On December 24, 2002 at 5:15 p.m., police dispatch received an anonymous call regarding a "white male driving a white 2001 Ford pick-up and dumping items at Etiwanda Avenue and North Rim Way". Deputies responded within 30 minutes and contacted a male person on the 5500 block of Sage Brush Court. The person advised the deputies that he picks up trash and leaves it in piles for the City to pick up at a later time. He indicated to the deputies that he would write a letter to the City. The deputies cleared the call as "necessary action taken". On December 26, 2002, Code Enfomement received a citizen's request to address items dumped at the "top of Etiwanda near Ridgeview Estates". Additionally, the City Manager's Office received an anonymous letter (which later was revealed as generated by the same concerned citizen) advising "Etiwanda residents" of the dumping concern and to contact the City for assistance. The letter was delivered to Code Enfomement for follow-up. The letter indicated that the author and his wife walk along the County and City areas of north Etiwanda Avenue and pick up trash along the way. Apparently, they dump the collected trash on Etiwanda Avenue at Wilson Avenue for Public Works to pick up on a regular basis. In the letter, the author indicated that he was contacted on December 24, 2002 by Rancho Cucamonga deputies after an area resident contacted the police department for this activity. No arrest was made, but the author was apparently inspired to draft a letter to the surrounding area residents. Code Enforcement immediately responded to the area and discovered items dumped on the City's street at Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue. Additional dumping was discovered on a County dirt road east of the location and north of Etiwanda Avenue where the City's street ends. Code Enforcement contacted Public Works to remove the items from the street locations and the work was completed on the same day. San Bernardino County Weed Abatement was notified for the removal of the items from the County's land. San Bernardino County Weed Abatement inspected the County land and advised that they had already mailed notices to several of the landholders regarding the weed abatement and trash debris. They stated that they would mail "ten day" notices to the remaining landholders who were not already notified to abate the trash. Code Enforcement notified the reporting party of the action taken. It was at this time that the reporting party identified himself as the author of the anonymous letter. Code Enforcement volunteered to remain as a liaison with County Weed Abatement until the concern resolved. The caller was grateful for this action. On January 21, 2003, Code Enforcement re-inspected the County land area and discovered the dumped items had been removed. San Bernardino County Weed Abatement advised that they had removed 14 dump truck loads of debris weighing 28,880 pounds (over 14 tons) and one truckload containing 45 automotive tires from the County land area. Additionally, County Weed Abatement reported that several area residents and joggers expressed their gratitude for the clean-up. County Weed Abatement advised that they would continue to monitor the area and that any further dumping would be removed during normal weed abatement cycles (generally, twice annually). Code Enforcement notified the reporting party and closed the case. The Building and Safety Department is currently working with the Engineering Department to consider all possible options to limit public access on the dirt roads which annex the County territory. -2- 1% T H E C I T Y 0 F l~A N C H 0 C U CA N 0 N C.A Staff Report DAT~: February 5, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II1'"~/~ SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolutiori Supporting and Endorsing the Proposed Mission Statement of a coalition between organized labor and local governments being created as part of the League of California Cities Grassroots Movement Back.qround Last year the League of California Cities implemented a grassroots movement to increase the effectiveness of member cities' joint efforts to protect local control for cities through advocacy and education. The Network consists of individual coordinators/regional representatives assigned to field offices in different regions of the State. The number one priority of the grassroots network is to work to protect local revenues by forming coalitions to support legislation that benefits all cities. One such coalition, LOCAL, was formed fast year to coordinate the efforts of cities, counties, and special districts in protecting local revenues and services. LOCAL, which is an acronym for "Leave Our Community Assets Local" has been successful in recruiting business, public safety, seniors, and public health groups to join local officials in highlighting the impacts of state budget cuts to local services. Rancho Cucamonga community representatives on the LOCAL Coalition include Fire Chief Dennis Michael representing public safety and Pauline Dean representing the senior community. For some time the grassroots coordinators have been working to bring labor leaders into the LOCAL coalition. The League/Labor group has met several times and has agreed to a proposed mission statement. The League is requesting that all member cities support and endorse the mission statement included in the attached resolution. Recommendation Approve the attached Resolution supporting and endorsing the proposed Mission Statement of the coalition between organized labor and local governments being created as part of the League of California Cities Grassroots Movement. Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III RESOLUT,O..O. OS- Y A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AND ENDORSING THE PROPOSED MISSION STATEMENT OF A COALITION BETWEEN ORGANIZED LABOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS BEING CREATED AS PART OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES GRASSROOTS NETWORK WHEREAS, in 2001, the member cities of the League of California Cities approved the creation of a Grassroots Network; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Grassroots Network is to increase the effectiveness of cities' joint efforts to protect local control and reduce the likelihood of city revenues being taken away by the State; and, WHEREAS, the League joined forces with the California State Association of Counties and the California Special Districts Association in a coalition to coordinate their efforts in protecting local services. Called LOCAL (Leave Our Community Assets Local), the coalition provides a framework for united actions by local government units; and, WHEREAS, the LOCAL Coalition has successfully enlisted groups including business, public health, public safety, seniors and others to join local officials in highlighting the ramifications of state budget cuts to local services; and, WHEREAS, the Inland Empire Division of the League of California Cities has been meeting with leaders of local organized labor organizations to enlist their support of the LOCAL Coalition's efforts to protect local government for the benefit of both cities and labor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby endorses and supports the following proposed Mission Statement of the local government/labor coalition being created as part of the League of California Cities Grassroots Network: Organized Labor and Local Govemments agree to work together with other advocates to lobby California State Government to protect local government services and revenues, and jobs with fair wages and benefits. Together we recognize the importance of maintaining local revenue streams to preserve and create good paying jobs and promote economic growth while continuing to provide basic services and protect the quality of life for our communities. As partners, we will remain united to support issues of mutual interest. Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ., 2003. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the __ day of ,2003. Executed this __ day of ., 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk