Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003/03/19 - Agenda Packet
RAN C O N GA 11.050~0 c~,c ~ce nt~r~r ? r,v..e. City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS CITY COUNCIL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. MARCH 19, 2003 A.qenc¥, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting .... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander , Gutierrez__ Howdysheil , Kurth , and Williams__ B.~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Lt. Ron Cochran of the Police Department for his years of service to the community. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation and Commemorative Gavel to current Council Member, and former Rancho Cucamonga Library Board of Trustees President, Robert J. Howdyshell, for his years of service to the library and the community. 3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "American Red Cross Month." C..~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register February 26 through March 10, 2003, 1 and Payroll for the total amount of $4,376,344.84. 2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29 28, 2003. 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for 35 the construction of Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' west, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1407176 (Measure "1" Funds). City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 2 RESOLUTION NO. 03-060 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000+ WEST IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE B~DS 4. Approval to reject all bids received for the construction of the Fisher 42 Drive Street Improvements from East Avenue to Mulberry Street as non-responsive to the needs of the City. 5. Approval of a request from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America for 47 Waiver of Rental Fees for their Scout-O-Rama at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Soccer Fields on April 26 and April 27, 2003. 6. Approval of City Co-Sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All- 51 Star Game at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on June 5th (practice game) and June 10, 2003 (game date). 7. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 56 Report and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2003, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal year 2003/2004 for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 03-061 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 03-062 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 3 8. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 61 Report and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2003, to levy annual assessments for FY 2003/2004 for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 03-063 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7AND8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 03-064 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 9. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming Engineer's Report 66 and setting of public hearing for May 21, 2003, to levy annual assessments for FY 2003/2004 for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 03-065 68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 03-066 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 4 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 71 ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00820, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 03-067 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00820 RESOLUTION NO. 03-068 '/5 A RESOLUTION OF THE C~TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00820 11. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities, 83 ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No. 16116, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., APN: 225-181-04, 06, 07, 08 and 43. RESOLUTION NO. 03-069 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16116, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 03-070 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 16116 12. Approval of an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 95 Ronald and Jane Geary, husband and wife, to acquire street right-of- way (CO 03-016). City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 5 13. Approval of an Amendment to Contract No. 01-018 with Nestor Traffic 9'/ Systems regarding records retention for automated traffic signal violations. 14. Approval of an Agreement with California State University San '10'1 Bernardino (CO 03-017) for participation in the State Work-Study Program. 15. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the '102 execution of the contract in the amount of $498,599.39 ($453,272.17 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Vance Corporation (CO 03-018), for the construction of the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street, to be funded from Measure 'T' Funds, Acct. No. 1176303565011446176-0 ($320,478.64) and Mello-Roos (FS) Funds, Acct. No. 32835165602 ($178,120.75). 16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for CUP 97-19, 107 located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by American Stores Properties, Inc. 17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14509, 109 located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by ICSWH Hermosa, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. 18. Approval to accept the construction of the Community Trail Fencing and '1'1'1 PCC Curb along Summit Trail at south side of Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road, west of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02-058 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $36,218.25. RESOLUTION NO. 03-071 '1'12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING AND PCC CURB ALONG SUMMIT TRAIL AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ALONG HILLSIDE TRAIL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, WEST OF BERYL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 02-058 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 19. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue and 19t~' Street, southwest '1'14 corner, Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-068 as complete, retain the performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $197,301.26. City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 6 RESOLUTION NO. 03-072 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL~FORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 02-068 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 117 Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for the Construction of Park Trash Enclosures. RESOLUTION NO. 03-073 118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL 119 ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-17 - GOUGH - An appeal of the Planning Commission APPROVAL OF A ~EQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 2,945 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION WiTH CONVENIENCE MARKET, DRIVE-THRU CARWASH, AND PUMP ISLAND ON 1-ACRE OF LAND IN THE community Commercial District (Subarea 2), of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-211-12 and 13. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 5, 2003 - REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 2, 2003) City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 7 RESOLUTION NO. 03-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-17, REQUESTING TO CONSTRUCT A 2,945 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION WiTH CONVENIENCE MARKET, DRIVE THRU CARWASH, AND PUMP ISLAND ON 1-ACRE OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SiDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS iN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 207-211-12 AND 13 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN '120 AMENDMENT GPA2.002-00001 - FRAZlER GROUP - A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33, and 50. Related files: Pre- Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002- 00589, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 120 /NMENDMENT DDA2002~0001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the Development District zoning designaUon within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Offk::e and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33, and 50. Related Files: Pre-Appfication Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPP,2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE 120 AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on lhe north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33, and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-000011, and Development Dis~ct Amendment DDA2.002-00001. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental-impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 03-074 166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP PROVISIONS FROM OFFICE TO MIXED USE FOR 7.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207-101-32, 33, AND 50 ORDINANCE NO. 702 (first reading) 176 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM OFFICE TO MIXED USE FOR 7.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-101-32, 33 AND 50 City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 9 ORDINANCE NO. 703 (first reading) 185 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OFFICE USES, OR MEDIUM- HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OFFICE USES WHEN DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.08 AND 17.32 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR 7.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-101-32, 33 AND 50 3. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF 197 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, permitting private school uses within all four subareas and modifying the requirements for public hearing notices within the Foothill Boulevard Districts to a 300-foot radius of proposed projects. ORDINANCE NO. 704 (first reading) 225 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031, AMENDING SECTION 17.32 (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, PERMITTING PRIVATE SCHOOL USES WITHIN ALL FOUR SUBAREAS AND MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES OF THE FOUR SUBAREAS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS TO A 300-FOOT RADIUS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 10 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIFIED 231 GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2002 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CENTRAL PARK RESOLUTION NO. 03-075 232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO FILE FOR THE SPECIFIED GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2002 2. CONSIDERATION OF GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY (CO 03-018) AND THE CITY OF 234 RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PRESENTATION BY THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT REGARDING POSSIBLE ANNEXATION INTO THEIR DISTRICT 2. CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL ON 242 ROCHESTER AVENUE DURING QUAKES BASEBALL GAMES 3. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 245 UPDATE City Council Agenda March 19, 2003 11 4. DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL 256 SUBCOMMITTEES 5. CONSIDERATION TO IMPLEMENT THE UPDATED AGENDA 262 FORMAT J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K...~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 13, 2003, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. T H E C I T Y 0 F I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: March 13, 200~ TO: R~j~z, Councilmember FROM: Pa~l~ster, Deputy City Manager SUB. CT:Warr~ntsarrants ReviewReview fnrfor Council Meet,ng--March' 19, 2003 The City Attorney has had an opportunity to review the Summary of Warrants for the March 19, 2003, Council meeting and has advised that you should abstain from voting on the warrant paid by the Redevelopment Agency to Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $5,772.00. If you have any questions, please give me a call at extension 2003. c: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Debbie Adams, City Clerk: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Tamara Layne, Finance Officer Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor T H E C I T Y 0 F ~AN C H 0 C U CAI~I 0 N GA Memorandum DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Debbie Adams, City Clerk CC: Jack Lam, City Manager Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ann Haworth, Accounting Services Supervisor FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer /~ SUBJECT: Summary of Warrants Issued to Vendors Representing Possible Conflict of Interest for Councilmember Gutierrez - Council Meeting Date: March '19, 2003 Attached for your reference is a summary of warrants by entity that were issued to vendors representing a possible conflict of interest for Councilmember Gutierrez due to his personal business dealings with them. These warrants are included in the Consent Calendar section of each entity's agenda. If you have any questions regarding the attached, please give me a call at extension 2430. Thank you. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 19, 2003 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT Arrowhead Credit Union 194131 2/26/2003 $3,967.39 Arrowhead Credit Union 194423 3/4/2003 $1,696.01 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 194332 2/26/2003 $200.00 Southern Cai Edison 194376 2/26/2003 $31,212.66 Southern Cai Edison 194631 3/5/2003 $57.46 Southern Cai Edison 194634 3/5/2003 $6,037.86 i:financelaccounts payable~council warrant list. xls CITY- 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 19, 2003 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT Arrowhead Credit Union 194423 3/4/2003 $312.50 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 194331 2/26/2003 $5,772.00 i:\finance~accounts payable~council warrant list.xls RDA- 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCILMI::MBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATI:: MARCH 19, 2003 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT ^rrowhead Credit Union 194131 2/26/2003 $203.33 Arrowhead Credit Union 194423 3/4/2003 $820.63 Southern Cai Edison 194376 2/26/2003 $31,212.66 Southern Cai Edison 194634 3/5/2003 $429.76 h~finance~accounts payable~council warrant list. xls FI RE- 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194106 2/26/2003 CLOUT 60.00 AP - 00194107 2/26/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 30.00 AP - 00194107 2/26/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 30.00 AP - 00194110 2/26/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 329.95 AP - 00194110 2/26/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 71.85 AP - 00194111 2/26/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7.54 AP- 00194111 2/26/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 24.19 AP- 00194111 2/26/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 645.65 AP - 00194111 2/26/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 16.16 AP- 00194111 2/26/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12.02 AP- 00194112 2/26/2003 ABLAC 294.06 AP- 00194114 2/26/2003 ACT GIS INC 1,609.09 AP - 00194115 2/26/2003 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 447.00 AP- 00194116 2/26/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 576.00 AP - 00194116 2/26/2003 ADAMSON, RONALD 448.00 AP - 00194117 2/26/2003 AGUiLERA, ANA 62.00 AP - 00194121 2/26/2003 ALLAN HOROWITZ 500.00 AP - 00194122 2/26/2003 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 126.06 AP - 00194123 2/26/2003 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 807.00 AP - 00194124 2/26/2003 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 249.03 AP - 00194125 2/26/2003 AMIN, HEATHER 49.00 AP- 00194126 2/26/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 535.00 AP- 00194126 2/26/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00194126 2/26/2003 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP- 00194127 2/26/2003 APPLIED CONCEPTS 177.25 AP- 00194128 2/26/2003 ARBOR NURSERY INC 432.08 AP- 00194129 2/26/2003 ARCH WIRELESS 398.29 AP - 00194130 2/26/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,080.00 AP- 00194130 2/26/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,152.00 AP - 00194130 2/26/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 864.00 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 339.00 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 75.31 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 161.63 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 31.53 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 27.93 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 254.84 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 85.98 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 213.48 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 66.34 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 147.27 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 21.95 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 50.11 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 38.34 AP- 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWItEAD CREDIT UNION 35.70 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 600.00 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 75.83 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,320.80 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 107.12 AP - 00194131 2/26/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 110.90 AP-00194132 2/26/2003 ASSISECURITY 385.00 AP- 00194132 2/26/2003 ASSISECURITY 895.00 AP - 00194133 2/26/2003 ATTRHIA, MIA 200.00 AP - 00194134 2/26/2003 ALrFBAU CORPORATION 16,280.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~ 12:47:3 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194134 2/26/2003 AUFBAU CORPORATION 15,614.00 AP - 00194135 2/26/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 71.12 AP - 00194135 2/26~2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 142.23 AP - 00194135 2/26/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 27.48 AP - 00194135 2/26/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 147.23 AP - 00194135 2/26/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 105.81 AP 00194139 2/26/2003 BARREDA, AUGIE 123.75 AP 00194140 2/26/2003 BARSTOOLSETC 595.00 AP 00194142 2/26/2003 BEDI, LEENA 55.00 AP 00194143 2/26/2003 BEHAIRY, NIVEIN 96.00 AP 00194144 2/26/2003 BRADY, TRACEY 48.00 AP 00194145 2/26/2003 BRESEE, OLGA JOI 20.00 AP 00194146 2/26/2003 BRODART BOOKS 257.79 AP 00194146 2/26/2003 BRODARTBOOKS 173.42 AP 00194147 2/26/2003 BURKES, MS KRIS 500.00 AP 00194148 2/26/2003 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 118.29 AP 00194149 2/26/2003 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 773.91 AP 00194152 2/26/2003 CALHOUN, LISA 200.00 AP 00194153 2/26/2003 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 105.00 AP 00194154 2/26/2003 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 3.50 AP 00194155 2/26/2003 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' 64,713.68 AP 00194156 2/26/2003 CALSENSE 813.55 AP 00194158 2/26/2003 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 186.88 AP 00194159 2/26/2003 CELSOC 76.00 AP 00194159 2/26/2003 CELSOC 304.00 AP 00194159 2/26/2003 CELSOC 57.00 AP 00194159 2/26/2003 CELSOC 90.44 AP 00194160 2/26/2003 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72 AP 00194161 2/26/2003 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 763.10 AP 00194162 2/26/2003 CHACON, LOKENA 65.00 AP 00194163 2/26/2003 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 285.53 AP 00194163 2/26/2003 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIAL1ES 4,140.83 AP 00194164 2/26/2003 CHEN, YUMING 89.65 AP 00194165 2/26/2003 CHEVRON USA INC 153.19 AP 00194167 2/26/2003 CITY RENTALS 32.54 AP 00194168 2/26/2003 CLAYTON, JANICE 100.00 AP 00194169 2/26/2003 CLOUGHERTY PACKING COMPANY 310.49 AP 00194170 2/26/2003 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 15,773.00 AP 00194173 2/26/2003 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY 319.99 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 980.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 220.82 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 87.00 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 130.36 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 130.36 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 92.57 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 126.96 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 60.35 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 79.50 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 179.30 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 5,457.31 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 180.86 AP- 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00 AP - 00194174 2/26/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00 AP- 00194175 2/26/2003 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50 AP - 00194176 2/26/2003 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 173.48 AP - 00194176 2/26/2003 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 119.49 AP - 00194177 2/26/2003 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 80.00 AP- 00194178 2/26/2003 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES 1,638.30 AP- 00194179 2/26/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP- 00194179 2/26/2003 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP- 00194180 2/26/2003 CPRS SUPERVISORS SECTION 175.00 AP- 00194180 2/26/2003 CPRS SUPERVISORS SECTION 140.00 AP- 00194181 2/26/2003 CRAVALHO, CHAD 250.00 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 312.10 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 476.23 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 493.74 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 55.84 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 613.22 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 260.96 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 131.85 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 79.32 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 56.14 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 137.00 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 78.50 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 125.67 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.08 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 119.85 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 101.16 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 86.53 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.38 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 46.57 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 130.15 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 132.21 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 107.49 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 78.50 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 106.10 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 306.28 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 134.94 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONOA CO WATER DIST 184.74 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 56.14 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC ~ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time' ~ 12:47:3/.) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.99 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 170.32 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 207.04 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 148.69 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 39.36 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 19.93 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 145.60 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 157.96 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 69.37 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 47.60 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 46.57 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 145.60 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 37.30 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 84.47 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 143.54 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 120.88 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 54.81 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 85.50 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 131.18 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 76.23 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 109.19 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 127.06 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 174.44 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 134.27 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 147.66 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 524.64 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 509.19 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 391.77 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 341.30 AP - 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 362.93 AP- 00194183 2/26/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 406.19 AP - 00194184 2/26/2003 CURRAN, TONYA 53.00 AP - 00194186 2/26/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,100.00 AP - 00194186 2/26/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,450.00 AP ~ 00194186 2/26/2003 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 700.00 AP - 00194187 2/26/2003 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 993.02 AP - 00194187 2/26/2003 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 3.57 AP - 00194187 2/26/2003 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 275.35 AP - 00194188 2/26/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 646.50 AP - 00194189 2/26/2003 DAPPER TIRE CO 56.76 AP - 00194190 2/26/2003 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 255.50 AP- 00194191 2/26/2003 DEL MECHANICAL 110.05 AP- 00194192 2/26/2003 DELLHIME, SIGMUND 12.95 AP- 00194193 2/26/2003 DEMCO INC 91.37 AP - 00194194 2/26/2003 DENTAL I-IEALTH SERVICES 179.25 AP - 00194195 2/26/2003 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 17.00 AP - 00194196 2/26/2003 DEUCHAR, PATRICIA 42.00 AP - 00194197 2/26/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 225.28 AP - 00194198 2/26/2003 ELEMENT K JOURNALS 137.00 AP - 00194199 2/26/2003 EMBEE TECHNOLOGIES 239.36 AP - 00194200 2/26/2003 EMP AMERICA INC. 769.14 AP - 00194201 2/26/2003 ESCOTO, YOLANDA 45.00 AP - 00194202 2/26/2003 ESGIL CORPORATION 16,146.64 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, t 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194203 2/26/2003 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 770.00 AP - 00194203 2/26/2003 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,540.00 AP - 00194204 2/26/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.56 AP - 00194205 2/26/2003 FENCE MEDIC 1,158.93 AP - 00194206 2/26/2003 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 255.00 AP ~ 00194207 2/26/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 736.00 AP - 00194208 2/26/2003 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00 AP - 00194210 2/26/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 308.92 AP - 00194210 2/26/2003. FORD OF UPLAND INC 153.14 AP - 00194210 2/26/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 44.13 AP - 00194210 2/26/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC -3.23 AP- 00194211 2/26/2003 FORECAST COMM R/E SVC INC 428.17 AP - 00194212 2/26/2003 FOSTER, SHANDA 48.00 AP - 00194212 2/26/2003 FOSTER, SHANDA 5.00 AP - 00194213 2/26/2003 GARAY, KAREN 90.00 AP - 00194214 2/26/2003 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING IiX 1,296.00 AP - 00194216 2/26/2003 GERALD ROBINSON 500.00 AP - 00194217 2/26/2003 GO-MAN CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 AP - 00194218 2/26/2003 GRAFIUS, AMANDA 55.00 AP - 00194219 2/26/2003 GRAINGER, WW 442.14 AP- 00194221 2/26/2003 HAMILTON, MARK 3.80 AP- 00194222 2/26/2003 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 382.81 AP - 00194223 2/26/2003 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00194224 2/26/2003 HEYDE, DONALD 118.50 AP - 00194225 2/26/2003 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 504.67 AP- 00194226 2/26/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 121.45 AP - 00194226 2/26/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 392.48 AP - 00194226 2/26/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00194226 2/26/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 379.28 AP - 00194226 2/26/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 91.59 AP - 00194227 2/26/2003 HOSE MAN INC 11.59 AP - 00194227 2/26/2003 HOSE MAN INC 104.61 AP - 00194228 2/26/2003 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP - 00194230 2/26/2003 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP - 00194231 2/26/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 136.87 AP - 00194232 2/26/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 53.39 AP - 00194232 2/26/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 53.39 AP- 00194232 2/26/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 31.13 AP- 00194233 2/26/2003 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 102.73 AP ~ 00194234 2/26/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 933.52 AP - 00194234 2/26/2003 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 1,043.02 AP - 00194235 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 39.34 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 676.20 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 339.40 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 468.50 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 339.40 AP - 00194236 2/26/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 468.50 AP - 00194238 2/26/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 254.23 AP - 00194239 2/26/2003 IOUG HEADQUARTERS 375.00 AP - 00194240 2/26/2003 JACKSON HIRSH [NC 72.01 AP - 00194241 2/26/2003 JENSEN TREASURER, MARY LOU 100.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porh'ait Layout Time: ~, 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194242 2/26/2003 JIMENEZ, BILLIE JO 65.00 AP - 00194243 2/26/2003 JOBS AVAILABLE 29.95 AP - 00194244 2/26/2003 JOHNSON, JONIECE 69.00 AP - 00194245 2/26/2003 JOHNSON, WENDYANN 50.00 AP - 00194246 2/26/2003 JON'S FLAGS AND POLES 1,103.36 AP - 00194246 2/26/2003 JON'S FLAGS AND POLES 8.08 AP - 00194247 2/26/2003 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 47,719.85 AP - 00194247 2/26/2003 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 323.47 AP - 00194248 2/26/2003 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 590.27 AP - 00194249 2/26/2003 KAVANAUGH, DYANNA T. 79.00 AP - 00194250 2/26/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 995.88 AP - 00194251 2/26/2003 KIHM, LORRAINE 98.25 AP - 00194253 2/26/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 834.40 AP - 00194254 2/26/2003 L AND L NURSERY SUPPLY 36.00 AP- 00194255 2/26/2003 LAM, JACK 26.35 AP - 00194256 2/26/2003 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,300.00 AP - 00194256 2/26/2003 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,200.00 AP - 00194258 2/26/2003 LlEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,440.00 AP - 00194259 2/26/2003 LILBURN CORPORATION 17,999.14 AP - 00194259 2/26/2003 LILBURN CORPORATION 3,282.50 AP - 00194259 2/26/2003 LILBURN CORPORATION 3,640.00 AP 00194259 2/26/2003 LILBURNCORPORATION 16,597.31 AP 00194260 2/26/2003 LINEAR SYSTEMS 1,291.30 AP 00194262 2/26/2003 LONCAR, PHILIP 123.75 AP 00194263 2/26/2003 LOREEN, JOSEPH 48.00 AP 00194264 2/26/2003 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP 00194266 2/26/2003 LUCKOFF, HANS 31.65 AP 00194267 2/26/2003 LUGOSI, VICTORIA 36.75 AP 00194268 2/26/2003 MAHJOUB, SUSAN 48.00 AP 00194269 2/26/2003 MARIANI, DOUGLAS 200.00 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 119.92 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,796.66 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,840.44 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 17,938.85 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 37.39 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 7,787.96 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 6,885.11 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 1,103.97 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MAR1POSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 117.83 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTUR. AL ENT INC 294.20 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 4,598.59 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTiNC 497.46 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,578.39 AP 00194270 2/26/2003 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 65.85 AP 00194271 2/26/2003 MARKCHRIS INC 809.10 AP 00194272 2/26/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00194272 2/26/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00194272 2/26/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 35.00 AP 00194272 2/26/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00194273 2/26/2003 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 59.44 AP - 00194274 2/26/2003 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 875.36 AP ~ 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 11,402.50 AP - 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 6,840.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 03/11/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porirait Layout Time: ~, 12:47:3 6, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 8,237.50 AP - 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 5,145.00 AP ~ 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 4,945.00 AP - 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 3,467.50 AP - 00194275 2/26/2003 MDS CONSULTING 728.00 AP - 00194277 2/26/2003 MELETZ, MARCIA 40.00 AP - 00194278 2/26/2003 MELLEM, SANDRA 55.50 AP - 00194279 212612003 MEYER, PATRICIA 16.00 AP - 00194280 2/26/2003 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 95.68 AP - 00194280 2/26/2003 MICROAGE COMPLITERMART 72.25 AP - 00194280 2/26/2003 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00194280 2/26/2003 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 216.75 AP - 00194280 2/26/2003 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 313.90 AP - 00194281 2/26/2003 MOBECK, ALICIA 34.00 AP - 00194281 2/26/2003 MOBECK, ALICIA 5.00 AP - 00194282 2/26/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 130.38 AP - 00194282 2/26/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46 AP - 00194284 2/26/2003 MORITA, DUANE 5,443.50 AP - 00194285 2/26/2003 MR TS 24HR TOWING 65.00 AP - 00194285 2/26/2003 MR TS 24HR TOWING 122.00 AP - 00194287 2/26/2003 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85 AP - 00194288 2/26/2003 NALBACH, MARISA 23.00 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 134.34 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 85.83 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 14.27 AP- 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 230.89 AP- 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.41 AP- 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 80.60 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 81.46 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 30.53 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 64.52 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.75 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 54.40 AP- 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 179.71 AP- 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 99.35 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 51.29 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.24 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 50.62 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 443.50 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 168.35 AP - 00194289 2/26/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 98.04 AP - 00194290 2/26/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP - 00194290 2/26/2003 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 68.93 AP - 00194291 2/26/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,574.49 AP - 00194292 2/26/2003 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 139.00 AP - 00194293 2/26/2003 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATI 25.00 AP - 00194294 2/26/2003 NATIONS RENT 56.57 AP - 00194295 2/26/2003 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 12,772.21 AP - 00194296 2/26/2003 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00 AP - 00194297 2/26/2003 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00194299 2/26/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 70.00 AP - 00194300 2/26/2003 NORONA, JORDAN 54.00 AP - 00194302 2/26/2003 OCEAN SYSTEMS 24,527.86 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~n~ 12:47:3 ,/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194303 2/26/2003 OCLC INC 79.70 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 10.60 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 139.16 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 60.82 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 55.47 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 63.99 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 96.24 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 13.95 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 104.26 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 304.33 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 71.44 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 47.35 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 35.60 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 282.46 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 113.07 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 5.32 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 85.27 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 221.90 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 65.13 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 18.91 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 14.83 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 52.69 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 269.36 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 15.61 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 153.13 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 376.22 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.31 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 43.36 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 79.11 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 51.21 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 79.15 AP- 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -99.15 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 31.80 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 30.58 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 37.71 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.15 AP-00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 15.25 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 28.34 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 58.97 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 226.84 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 164.10 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 129.04 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 90.34 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 370.57 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 92.67 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 1.94 AP - 00194306 2/26/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 9.86 AP - 00194307 2/26/2003 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35 AP - 00194308 2/26/2003 OPEN APPS 570.00 AP - 00194309 2/26/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 257.71 AP - 00194310 2/26/2003 PACIFIC VIDEO PRODUCTS 215.50 AP - 00194311 2/26/2003 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 200.57 AP- 00194312 2/26/2003 PARK, SUK 88.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194313 2/26/2003 PATEL, DIPTI 130.00 AP - 00194314 2/26/2003 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 11,035.94 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 199.50 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 2,463.91 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 111.14 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 290.50 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 189.27 AP - 00194315 2/26/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 90.00 AP - 00194316 2/26/2003 PINHEIRO, RAFAEL LEON 70.00 AP- 00194317 2/26/2003 PITNEY BOWES 275.49 AP- 00194317 2/26/2003 PITNEY BOWES 30.95 AP- 00194318 2/26/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,681.54 AP- 00194318 2/26/2003 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 9,923.63 AP- 00194318 2/26/2003 POMADISTRIBUT1NG CO 7,322.42 AP - 00194320 2/26/2003 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00194321 2/26/2003 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 564.27 AP - 00194322 2/26/2003 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,681.30 AP - 00194323 2/26/2003 PRINCIPAL LIFE 65,719.70 AP - 00194323 2/26/2003 PRINCIPAL LIFE 14,758.74 AP - 00194324 2/26/2003 PROJECT SISTER 873.00 AP - 00194325 2/26/2003 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 148.50 AP - 00194326 2/26/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00194326 2/26/2003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00194327 2/26/2003 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 763.74 AP - 00194328 2/26/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 60.34 AP- 00194329 2/26/2003 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP- 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP- 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP- 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 79.41 AP- 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP- 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00194330 2/26/2003 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00194332 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 200.00 AP - 00194333 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDA 31.00 AP - 00194334 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00194334 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00194334 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,000.00 AP - 00194334 2/26/2003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,000.00 AP - 00194335 2/26/2003 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 65.73 AP- 00194336 2/26/2003 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 228.88 AP- 00194336 2/26/2003 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 268.88 AP - 00194337 2/26/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 18.20 AP - 00194337 2/26/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00194338 2/26/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP - 00194339 2/26/2003 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00194340 2/26/2003 RESIDENTUAL FIRE SYSTEMS INC 48.25 AP - 00194341 2/26/2003 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00194342 2/26/2003 RHOADES AND, JESSICA 2,500.00 AP - 00194343 2/26/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 632.15 AP - 00194344 2/26/2003 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~t 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194345 2/26/2003 ROBINSON FERTILIZER COMPANY INC 0.42 AP - 00194346 2/26/2003 ROBINSON FERTILIZER COMPANY INC 1,178.62 AP - 00194346 2/26/2003 ROBINSON FERTILIZER COMPANY INC 278.22 AP - 00194347 2/26/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 244.80 AP - 00194348 2/26/2003 RUBIO, RONDA 2.00 AP - 00194349 2/26/2003 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 201.81 AP - 00194350 2/26/2003 SALAZAR, CHRISTOPHER 45.00 AP - 00194351 2/26/2003 SALOMON, ISABEL 94.00 AP - 00194352 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEIxY 289.68 AP - 00194353 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENr 220.00 AP - 00194355 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 64.00 AP - 00194356 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 13,333.32 AP 00194356 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 23,704.17 AP 00194356 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 16,600.00 AP 00194356 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,023,511.68 AP 00194356 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 15,320.83 AP 00194357 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP 00194357 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP - 00194358 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 793.10 AP- 00194358 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 781.36 AP- 00194358 2/26/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 13.51 AP- 00194359 2/26/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 1,025.78 AP - 00194360 2/26/2003 SANDRIDGE, SUSAN 34.00 AP - 00194360 2/26/2003 SANDRIDGE, SUSAN 5.00 AP-00194361 2/26/2003 SBC/PACIEICBELL 1,331.22 AP - 00194362 2/26/2003 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 285.75 AP - 00194363 2/26/2003 SEALE, NATALIE 40.00 AP- 00194364 2/26/2003 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS 1,717.10 AP - 00194364 2/26/2003 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS 1,717.11 AP- 00194364 2/26/2003 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS 214.42 AP - 00194365 2/26/2003 SHARRA, SUSAN 129.00 AP - 00194366 2/26/2003 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT 484.95 AP - 00194366 2~26~2003 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT 524.41 AP - 00194367 2/26/2003 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT 8,198.30 AP- 00194367 2/26/2003 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT 8,865.52 AP - 00194368 2/26/2003 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP- 00194368 2/26/2003 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 218.50 AP - 00194371 2/26/2003 SMART AND FINAL 27.93 AP - 00194372 2/26/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 886.40 AP - 00194372 2/26/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 372.77 AP - 00194372 2/26/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 206.79 AP - 00194372 2/26/2003 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,109.16 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.33 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.73 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.96 AP ~ 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time,.' s, 12:47:3 / O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.40 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.02 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 236.54 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.94 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.52 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.91 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.73 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP- 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA I~DISON 14.16 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.61 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTI~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.74 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.67 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 420.87 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.73 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.07 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.26 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.43 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.33 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,681.20 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,502.03 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.25 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.: ~ 12:47:3 / / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.29 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.97 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 231.46 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.31 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.83 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.04 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.36 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 ~OUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.74 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.07 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.76 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.83 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26~2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.00 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.57 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.45 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.33 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.00 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.78 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.08 AP -_00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 187.91 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 176.68 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.41 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.46 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.35 AP- 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.59 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.09 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.22 AP- 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.12 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.34 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.75 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.85 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timei,~ 12:47:3 //-. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.45 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.05 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.88 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.72 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHI~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.70 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.79 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.35 AP - 00194376 2/26/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.69 AP - 00194378 2/26/2003 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC 96.55 AP ~ 00194379 2/26/2003 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 122.59 AP - 00194380 2/26/2003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 71.37 AP - 00194381 2/26/2003 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 220.78 AP- 00194382 2/26/2003 STOFA, JOSEPH 21.00 AP- 00194383 2/26/2003 TALWAR, PREETHI 36.75 AP - 00194383 2/26/2003 TALWAR, PREETHI 6.00 AP- 00194384 2/26/2003 TARGET 52.02 AP- 00194384 2/26/2003 TARGET 73.79 AP-00194384 2/26/2003 TARGET 105.71 AP-00194385 2/26/2003 TARGET 8.03 AP - 00194387 2/26/2003 TRAINING NETWORK, THE 40.00 AP - 00194388 2/26/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 5,918.00 AP - 00194388 2/26/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,120.00 AP- 00194389 2/26/2003 TWOMEY, MATTHEW 63.00 AP- 00194391 2/26/2003 UNIQUELY YOURS 136.84 AP - 00194392 2/26/2003 UNITED FILIPPINO ASSOCIATION 200.00 AP - 00194393 2/26/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 16.00 AP- 00194393 2/26/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 21.64 AP- 00194394 2/26/2003 UNITED WAY 596.32 AP- 00194395 2/26/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 6,261.75 AP - 00194395 2/26/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 3,714.50 AP - 00194395 2/26/2003 US GUARDS CO INC 5,646.51 AP- 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.13 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.93 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 23.06 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 55.53 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 49.80 AP- 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 54.85 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 78.55 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time;at 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 tl~ough 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 28.39 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 104.40 AP ~ 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 48.46 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 28.39 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 27.78 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 27.43 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 28.92 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.00 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 27.91 AP-00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 23.17 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.83 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.00 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 32.77 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.25 AP - 00194396 2/26/2003 VERIZON 22.14 AP - 00194397 2/26/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00 AP - 00194397 2/26/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 375.00 AP - 00194398 2/26/2003 VILLALOBOS, PETE 79.00 AP - 00194398 2/26/2003 VILLALOBOS, PETE 21.00 AP - 00194399 2/26/2003 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP ~ 00194400 2/26/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 233.83 AP- 00194400 2/26/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10.17 AP - 00194400 2/26/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 26.25 AP - 00194400 2/26/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 52.53 AP - 00194400 2/26/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.9! AP - 00194401 2/26/2003 WARREN AND CO, CARL 403.40 AP - 00194402 2/26/2003 WATTERS, TRACY 39.50 AP - 00194402 2/26/2003 WATTERS, TRACY !0.50 AP 00194404 2/26/2003 WE]RICK PROPERTIES LIMITED 500.00 AP 00194405 2/26/2003 WESTGROUP 53.88 ' AP 00194405 2/26/2003 WEST GROUP 38.79 AP 00194405 2/26/2003 WEST GROUP 39.86 AP 00194405 2/26/2003 WEST GROUP 38.79 AP 00194406 2/26/2003 WESTERLIN, MERRY 50.00 AP 00194406 2/26/2003 WESTERLIN, MERRY 557.98 AP 00194407 2/26/2003 WESTERN LAWN EQUIPMENT 536.68 AP 00194408 2/26/2003 WILHOIT, KRISTIN 60.00 AP 00194410 2/26/2003 WOLFF, STEVE 57.11 AP- 00194411 2/26/2003 WOOD, DEBRA 5.00 AP - 00194412 2/26/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP- 00194412 2/26/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00194413 2/26/2003 YEE, LARRY 55.00 AP- 00194414 2/26/2003 YWCA OF THE WEST END 458.29 AP- 00194416 2/27/2003 KANESHINA, MATILDA 26.25 AP - 00194417 2/27/2003 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 225.28 AP - 00194418 2/27/2003 MYERS NUART LIGHTING PRODUCTS 8,704.00 . AP - 00194418 2/27/2003 MYERS NUART LIGHTING PRODUCTS 674.56 AP - 00194419 2/27/2003 SMIDERLE, BEA 50.00 AP - 00194420 2/27/2003 U S POSTMASTER 6,800.00 AP - 00194421 2/27/2003 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 108.01 AP - 00194423 3/4/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 360.75 AP - 00194423 3/4/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 49.98 AP - 00194423 3/4/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 15.71 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~:q 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194423 3/4/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 67.04 AP - 00194423 3/4/2003 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 69.40 AP - 00194427 3/5/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 30.00 AP - 00194427 3/5/2003 A 1 SMOG AND REPAIR 30.00 AP - 00194428 3/5/2003 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 78.41 AP - 00194429 3/5/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 113.14 AP - 00194429 3/5/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 48.49 AP - 00194429 3/5/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 35.02 AP - 00194429 3/5/2003 ABC LOCKSMITHS 159.81 AP ~ 00194430 3/5/2003 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00194431 3/5/2003 ABLETRONICS 29.59 AP - 00194432 3/5/2003 ACT GIS INC 13,600.00 AP - 00194433 3/5/2003 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 451.50 AP - 00194435 3/5/2003 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 313.87 AP - 00194436 3/5/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 3,547.50 AP - 00194436 3/5/2003 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 742.50 AP - 00194439 3/5/2003 ALL CITIES TOOLS 143.20 AP - 00194439 3/5/2003 ALL CITIES TOOLS 294.70 AP - 00194439 3/5/2003 ALL CITIES TOOLS 10.67 AP - 00194440 3/5/2003 ALPERTS PRINTING 18.59 AP - 00194441 3/5/2003 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 3,700.00 AP - 00194442 3/5/2003 ALVAREZ, MANUEL 60.00 AP - 00194443 3/5/2003 AMADOR, GILBERT 269.75 AP - 00194444 3/5/2003 AMERICAN RED CROSS 75.00 AP - 00194445 3/5/2003 AMITY MUSIC 200.00 AP - 00194446 3/5/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 455.25 AP - 00194446 3/5/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 397.00 AP - 00194446 3/5/2003 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 60.10 AP - 00194448 3/5/2003 ASSOC OF GOVT ACCOUNTANTS 100.00 AP - 00194449 3/5/2003 AUDIO EDITIONS 17.16 AP - 00194450 3/5/2003 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 555.97 AP ~ 00194451 3/5/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 252.45 AP - 00194451 3/5/2003 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -68.21 AP - 00194453 3/5/2003 BARNES AND NOBLE 80.04 AP - 00194454 3/5/2003 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 67.82 AP - 00194455 3/5/2003 BISHOP COMPANY 731.51 AP - 00194456 3/5/2003 BONHUS, BEN 10.00 AP - 00194457 3/5/2003 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 45.26 AP - 00194457 3/5/2003 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 12.93 AP - 00194458 3/5/2003 BRODART BOOKS 37.50 AP - 00194458 3/5/2003 BRODART BOOKS 464.03 AP - 00194458 3/5/2003 BRODART BOOKS 4.68 AP - 00194458 3/5/2003 BRODART BOOKS 9.37 AP - 00194460 3/5/2003 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38 AP - 00194461 3/5/2003 CALIFORNIA FENCE AND SUPPLY 5,998.27 AP - 00194462 3/5/2003 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 113.25 AP - 00194463 3/5/2003 CALSENSE 166.24 AP - 00194463 3/5/2003 CALSENSE 3,821.42 AP - 00194464 3/5/2003 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIFORNIA (CCAC) 395.00 AP - 00194465 3/5/2003 CITY RENTALS 274.84 AP - 00~94466 3/5/2003 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00194467 3/5/2003 CLAIM JUMPER 200.00 AP - 00194468 3/5/2003 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 140.46 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsbe~-ger Page: 15 Current Date: 03/11/20t2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~:~ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 57.68 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 77.08 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 220.82 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 220.82 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 71.50 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 1,102.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 5,644.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 5,644.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 74.60 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 72.12 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 77.08 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 101.24 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 57.01 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 125.78 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 111.16 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 125.23 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 437.24 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 86.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 167.87 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 69.65 ~P - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 79.50 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 197.24 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 63.02 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 102.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 179.30 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 220.82 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 67.01 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timl~ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 101.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 348.00 AP - 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 1,012.76 AP ~ 00194472 3/5/2003 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 220.82 AP - 00194473 3/5/2003 CONRAD BUSINESS SERVICES INC 3,000.00 AP - 00194475 3/5/2003 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 40.00 AP - 00194476 3/5/2003 COUNTS UNLIMITED 675.00 AP - 00194477 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA 220 LP/DEVELOPMENT ACCT 584.00 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 291.86 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,291.99 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 70.60 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 567.91 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,151.91 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 340.94 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 864.54 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 745.06 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 138.73 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 816.29 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 347.12 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 730.64 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 599.47 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 213.22 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 309.37 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 527.73 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 466.96 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,622.03 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 200.86 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 328.94 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 249.63 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 425.97 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 521.85 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 417.51 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 64.42 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 185.77 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.38 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 188.86 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 97.86 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 120.86 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 53.69 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.30 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 65.02 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 42.36 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 122.94 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 242.42 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 31.26 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 221.82 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.56 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 20.96 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 26.11 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 23.02 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 84.47 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Port~ait Layout Time.~a 12:47:3 /7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 32.29 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 45.54 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 118.46 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.42 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 92.02 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 358.29 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 558.79 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 153.15 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 149.36 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 198.04 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 70.99 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 96.83 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 118.82 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 133.24 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 104.04 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 168.93 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,002.41 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 128.43 AP 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 200.19 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 40.39 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 589.32 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 946.94 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 843.94 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 232.79 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 381.47 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 83.65 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 218.37 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 305.25 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 343.36 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 819.22 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 223.52 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 152.81 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 297.01 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 962.39 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 957.68 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUC .AMONGA CO WATER DIST 115.73 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 349.54 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 302.83 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 23.02 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 24.05 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,023.16 AP - 00194480 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 457.69 AP - 00194481 3/5/2003 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 840.00 AP - 00194482 3/5/2003 D 3 EQUIPMENT 329.46 AP - 00194483 3/5/2003 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 646.50 AP - 00194485 3/5/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 27,151.25 AP - 00194485 3/5/2003 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 14,270.00 AP - 00194487 3/5/2003 DATA QUICK 95.83 AP - 00194488 3/5/2003 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00194489 3/5/2003 DELTA DENTAL 28,471.50 AP - 00194492 3/5/2003 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 147.56 AP - 00194492 3/5/2003 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 145.88 AP - 00194492 3/5/2003 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 115.92 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~:~ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194493 3/5/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 2,258.00 AP - 00194493 3/5/2003 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 0.35 AP - 00194494 3/5/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 112.50 AP - 00194494 3/5/2003 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 112.50 AP - 00194495 3/5/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 17.62 AP - 00194495 3/5/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 102.20 AP - 00194495 3/5/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 213.70 AP - 00194495 3/5/2003 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 904.19 AP - 00194496 3/5/2003 FAIRMONT HOSPITALITY INC. 2,117.22 AP 00194497 3/5/2003 FAUST PRINTING INC 5,681.12 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.21 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.78 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.63 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.32 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 48.72 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.88 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.08 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.41 AP 00194498 3/5/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.39 AP 00194499 3/5/2003 FELIX, ADRIAN 40.00 AP 00194500 3/5/2003 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 695.10 AP 00194501 3/5/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00 AP 00194501 3/5/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP 00194501 3/5/2003 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 736.00 AP 00194502 3/5/2003 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 113.14 AP 00194503 3/5/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 19.99 AP 00194504 3/5/2003 FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 2,070.98 AP 00194505 3/5/2003 FORD OF UPLAND 1NC 107.84 AP 00194505 3/5/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 243.89 AP - 00194505 3/5/2003 FORD OF UPLAND INC 20.32 AP - 00194506 3/5/2003 FRIED, JULIE 53.00 AP - 00194507 3/5/2003 GADABOUT TOURS INC 896.40 AP - 00194507 3/5/2003 GADABOUT TOURS INC 696.40 AP - 00194508 3/5/2003 GARCIA, CANDY 200.00 AP - 00194509 3/5/2003 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING IiX 432.00 AP- 00194510 3/5/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 1,383.51 AP - 00194510 3/5/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 2,088.00 AP - 00194510 3/5/2003 GEOGRAPHICS 406.22 AP - 00194511 3/5/2003 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 AP - 00194512 3/5/2003 GRAINGER, WW 576.55 AP - 00194512 3/5/2003 GRAINGER, WW 54.55 AP - 00194512 3/5/2003 GRAINGER, WW 87.09 AP - 00194513 3/5/2003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 185.17 AP - 00194513 3/512003 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 73.57 AP - 00194514 3/5/2003 GREENBERG, ERIC 600.00 AP - 00194515 3/5/2003 GUARDIAN 2,952.09 AP - 00194516 3/5/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,149.78 AP - 00194516 3/5/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 188.46 AP - 00194516 3/5/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 194.86 AP - 00194516 3/5/2003' HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 212.06 AP - 00194516 3/5/2003 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 331.80 AP - 00194517 3/5/2003 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 210.75 AP - 00194518 3/5/2003 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 125.51 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tirol:q 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/2612003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194518 3/5/2003 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 47.76 AP - 00194519 3/5/2003 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 383.29 AP - 00194520 3/5/2003 HIGHLAND, DARCY 150.00 AP - 00194521 3/5/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 7,047.53 AP - 00194521 3/5/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 2,100.00 AP - 00194521 3/5/2003 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 1,200.00 AP - 00194522 3/5/2003 HINRICHSEN, BARBARA 549.00 AP - 00194523 3/5/2003 HOCKWALD, CLARK 35.00 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 46.34 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 31.25 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 106.37 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 98.06 AP - 00194524 3/5/2003 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00194525 3/5/2003 HOSE MAN INC 97.48 AP - 00194527 3/5/2003 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 217.22 AP - 00194529 3/5/2003 HUNTINGTON, TAMMY 85.00 AP - 00194530 3/5/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 82.54 AP - 00194530 3/5/2003 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 10.52 AP - 00194531 3/5/2003 1BM CORPORATION 50.64 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 860.49 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DLILUX PAINT CENTERS 264.74 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 19.46 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 510.28 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 119.04 AP - 00194532 3/5/2003 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 382.38 AP - 00194534 3/5/2003 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 294.00 AP ~ 00194534 3/5/2003 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 639.00 AP - 00194535 3/5/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 129.37 AP 00194535 3/5/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 345.20 AP 00194535 3/5/2003 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 188.24 AP 00194536 3/5/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 35.01 AP 00194536 3/5/2003 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 35.01 AP 00194538 3/5/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 21.72 AP 00194539 3/5/2003 INTEX PROPERTIES INLAND 314,003.40 AP 00194540 3/5/2003 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 30.00 AP 00194540 3/5/2003 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 30.00 AP 00194541 3/5/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 10,828.00 AP 00194541 3/5/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC -11,560.31 AP 00194541 3/5/2003 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 10,828.00 AP 00194542 3/5/2003 JOHNSON, SHERRELLE 200.00 AP ~ 00194543 3/5/2003 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,268.09 AP - 00194544 3/5/2003 JONES, ALICE 100.00 AP - 00194545 3/5/2003 KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC 1,000.00 AP - 00194546 3/5/2003 KELLEY, KRISTY 28.08 AP - 00194548 3/5/2003 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 145.13 AP - 00194549 3/5/2003 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 93.20 AP - 00194550 3/5/2003 LAM, JACK 100.44 AP - 00194551 3/5/2003 LAMB, BRIDGITTE 40.00 AP - 00194552 3/5/2003 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,075.00 AP - 00194553 3/5/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 63.83 AP - 00194553 3/5/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 135.90 AP - 00194553 3/5/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS 1NC 233.24 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timei __ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount. AP - 00194553 3/5/2003 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 785.07 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 2,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194554 3/5/2003 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00194556 3/5/2003 LIL STITCH 663.74 AP - 00194558 3/5/2003 LONG, ADAM 450.00 AP - 00194559 3/5/2003 LONG, JEFF 250.00 AP - 00194560 3/5/2003 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 495.47 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 103.32 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE~S COMPANIES INC. 311.40 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 27.28 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 382.12 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 19.23 AP - 00194561 3/5/2003 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 9.01 AP - 00194562 3/5/2003 LUPER, VIOLA LUCERO 144.00 AP - 00194563 3/5/2003 LYON COMPANY, WILLIAM 1,000.00 AP - 00194563 3/5/2003 LYON COMPANY, WILLIAM 1,000.00 AP - 00194563 3/5/2003 LYON COMPANY, WILLIAM 1,000.00 AP - 00194564 3/5/2003 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 54.00 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,845.19 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 82.37 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,718.70 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 156.91 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 45.24 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 148.00 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,631.13 AP - 00194565 3/5/2003 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,314.65 AP - 00194567 3/5/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 119.75 AP - 00194567 3/5/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 53.00 AP - 00194567 3/5/2003 MARSHALL PLUMBING 739.60 AP - 00194568 3/5/2003 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00194569 3/5/2003 MCKILLOP, DOREEN 39.50 AP - 00194569 3/5/2003 MCKILLOP, DOREEN 10.50 AP - 00194570 3/5/2003 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 9,000.00 AP - 00194571 3/5/2003 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 1,000.00 AP - 00194572 3/5/2003 MIDWEST TAPE 22.99 AP - 00194573 3/5/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67 AP - 00194573 3/5/2003 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67 AP - 00194574 3/5/2003 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 144.68 AP - 00194575 3/5/2003 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 209.99 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.09 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 287.08 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 85.58 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 22.96 AP - 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS -14.50 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~, 12:47:3 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS -3.88 AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 138.63 AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 20.11 AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 54.92 AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.32 AP 00194576 3/5/2003 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.09 AP 00194577 3/5/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED 8,508.67 AP 00194578 3/5/2003 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOC 70.00 AP 00194579 3/5/2003 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 165.00 AP 00194580 3/5/2003 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 35.00 AP 00194581 3/5/2003 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 35.00 AP 00194582 3/5/2003 NORRIS REPKE INC 17,897.60 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS 1NC 26.00 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 58.15 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 179.21 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 59.42 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 42.12 AP 00194583 3/5/2003 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 58.19 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 618.34 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 5.01 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 93.20 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -5.01 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 49.71 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.68 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 26.52 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 74.84 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 17.68 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 137.08 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 63.81 AP 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 247.05 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 16.46 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -31.63 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 26.63 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 94.50 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 479.13 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 4.47 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 74.84 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 3.85 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 154.39 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 159.92 AP ~ 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 77.03 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 164.05 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT -16.59 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 46.40 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 13.46 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 1,425.81 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 131.02 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 44.45 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 364.67 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 8.64 AP - 00194585 3/5/2003 OFFICE DEPOT 7.38 AP - 00194587 3/5/2003 OPEN APPS 484.52 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 76.84 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tinle:~ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 71.08 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 127.11 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.73 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 37.63 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 38.21 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 22.61 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 119.52 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 53.88 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 95.28 AP - 00194588 3/5/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.29 AP - 00194589 3/5/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 27.45 AP - 00194589 3/5/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 348.23 AP - 00194589 3/5/2003 OWEN ELECTRIC 46.07 AP - 00194590 3/5/2003 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 25.29 AP - 00194591 3/5/2003 PAPER DIRECT INC 41.94 AP - 00194592 3/5/2003 PARSAC 31,849.49 AP - 00194593 3/5/2003 PARSAC 200.00 AP - 00194594 3/5/2003 PATTON SALES CORP 143.02 AP - 00194594 3/5/2003 PATTON SALES CORP 34.44 AP - 00194595 3/5/2003 PAWLOWSKI, MONICA 5.00 AP - 00194595 3/5/2003 PAWLOWSKI, MONICA 53.00 AP - 00194596 3/5/2003 PEP BOYS 11.68 AP - 00194597 3/5/2003 PEREZ, HECTOR 46.00 AP - 00194598 3/5/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 377.77 AP - 00194598 3/5/2003 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 865.97 AP - 00194599 3/5/2003 PINHEIRO, RAFAEL LEON 35.00 AP - 00194600 3/5/2003 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 35.00 AP - 00194601 31512003 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00194603 3/5/2003 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 25.86 AP - 00194605 3/5/2003 R C PHOTOGRAPHY AND ASSOCIATES 355.58 AP - 00194606 3/5/2003 RANGEVIEW INVESTMENTS 1,000.00 AP - 00194607 3/5/2003 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 37.71 AP - 00194608 3/5/2003 RCPFA 4,101.68 AP - 00194609 3/5/2003 RED WING SHOE STORE 146.54 AP - 00194610 3/5/2003 REINHARDT, RITA 576.00 AP - 00194611 3/5/2003 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0.93 AP - 00194613 3~5~2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 5.01 AP - 00194613 3/5/2003 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 5.00 AP - 00194616 3/5/2003 ROMAN, DIANE 38.75 AP ~ 00194617 3/5/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 463.03 AP - 00194617 3/5/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 299.20 AP - 00194617 3/5/2003 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 299.20 AP - 00194618 3/5/2003 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 480.55 AP - 00194618 3/5/2003 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 250.90 AP - 00194619 3/5/2003 RUBIO, MICHELLE 55.00 AP - 00194621 3/5/2003 SAN BERN COUNTY 25.00 AP - 00194622 3/5/2003 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 191.80 AP - 00194623 3/5/2003 SCS SERVICES INC 9,300.00 AP - 00194624 3/5/2003 SIGN SHOP, THE 25.86 AP - 00194625 3/5/2003 SILHANEK, KAREN 18.31 AP - 00194627 3/5/2003 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,153.78 AP - 00194627 3/5/2003 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 522.05 AP - 00194627 3/5/2003 SiMPLOT PARTNERS 258.60 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 03/11/20{2 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timg:~ 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194628 3/5/2003 SMART AND FINAL 61.66 AP - 00194629 3/5/2003 SMITH MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,740.85 AP - 00194630 3/5/2003 SOLTIS 250.00 AP - 00194631 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.46 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.98 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.65 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.83 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 202.92 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.04 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 163.44 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.05 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.10 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON · 13.82 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.77 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.66 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.54 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.74 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.91 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.58 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.14 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.77 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.80 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.34 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 .zq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 426.04 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.83 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.98 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 487.99 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.66 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.34 AP ~ 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.99 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.92 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 308.31 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.07 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 172.41 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.66 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.66 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.34 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.45 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.34 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.51 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTI~ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.52 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.62 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 879.97 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.11 AP ~ 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194634 3/5/2003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00194636 3/5/2003 SPAIN, WILLIAM V. 762.50 AP - 00194637 3/5/2003 SPORT CHALET 302.56 AP - 00194638 3/5/2003 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 340.19 AP - 00194639 3/5/2003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4,763.66 AP - 00194640 3/5/2003 STEP, LING COI~I~EE SERVICE 375.49 AP - 00194641 3/5/2003 SUNRISE FORD 122.68 AP - 00194641 3/5/2003 SUNRISE FORD 49.14 AP - 00194642 3/5/2003 TANNER, O C 226.29 AP - 00194642 3/5/2003 TANNER, O C 226.29 AP - 00194642 3/5/2003 TANNER, O C 180.25 AP - 00194643 3/5/2003 TARGET 16.10 AP - 00194643 3/5/2003 TARGET 61.50 AP - 00194645 3/5/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 12,377.00 AP - 00194645 3/5/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 15,500.00 AP - 00194645 3/5/2003 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 5,275.00 AP - 00194646 3/5/2003 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 8,000.00 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFLI<ST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 126.12 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNI~'IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 627.80 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNII~'IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 566.09 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 142.77 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UN.'mST UNIFORM SERVICE 584.63 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNII~'IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.46 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UN L~'L~ST UNIFORM SERVICE 579.49 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.88 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 95.69 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNL~LRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNL~IRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNiFLRST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.46 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 573.08 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 86.03 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 183.28 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 597.63 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 46.50 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.46 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.46 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 121.22 AP - 00194649 3/5/2003 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP - 00194650 3/5/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 99,906.40 AP - 00194651 3/5/2003 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 45,808.82 AP - 00194652 3/5/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 21.00 AP - 00194652 3/5/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 24.34 AP - 00194652 3/5/2003 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 30.33 AP - 00194654 3/5/2003 VERBERA, PHIL 1,770.00 AP - 00194655 3/5/2003 VERIZON 28.47 AP - 00194655 3/5/2003 VERIZON 119.12 AP - 00194656 3/5/2003 VERMEER CALIFORNIA 58.57 AP - 00194657 3/5/2003 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 450.00 AP - 00194658 3/5/2003 VILLAGE NURSERIES 280.69 AP - 00194659 3/5/2003 VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI 28.80 AP - 00194660 3/5/2003 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,104.33 AP - 00194661 3/5/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 47.43 AP - 00194661 3/5/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 13.08 AP - 00194661 3/5/2003 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 112.91 AP - 00194662 3/5/2003 WARREN AND CO, CARL 73.64 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 26 Current Date: 03/11/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194663 3/5/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 301.10 AP - 00194664 3/5/2003 WATSON, DANIELLE 73.00 AP - 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 281.26 AP - 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 333.29 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXYE 695.47 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 401.94 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 39.07 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 162.89 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE -22.56 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAX1E 727.62 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 834.13 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE -41.69 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAXIE 551.15 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAX1E 106.30 AP 00194665 3/5/2003 WAX1E 36.58 AP 00194666 3/5/2003 WEST CONSTRUCTION INC 500.00 AP 00194667 3/5/2003 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 20.83 AP 00194667 3/5/2003 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 99.04 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 96.69 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 142.23 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 132.33 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 165.99 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 194.37 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 201.96 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 178.20 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 161.70 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 272.91 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRFLLC 216.48 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 90.09 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 48.51 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 112.20 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 95.04 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 106.26 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 158.40 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 104.61 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 192.39 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 178.86 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 184.47 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 187.77 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 200.64 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY. MRF LLC 179.85 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRFLLC 137.94 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 196.68 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRFLLC 12.21 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 154.77 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 160.38 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 150.81 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 163.68 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 197.34 AP 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 175.56 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 173.58 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 90.09 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 67.32 User: ahunsber ~ Ann Hunsberger Page: 27 Current Date: 03/11/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2003 through 3/10/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 83.16 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY IVIRF LLC 98.78 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 89.98 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 30.36 AP - 00194670 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 60.72 AP - 00194671 3/5/2003 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 18,896.04 AP - 00194672 3/5/2003 WEST, AMBER 21.96 AP - 00194673 3/5/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP - 00194673 3/5/2003 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00194674 3/5/2003 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L 899,157.60 AP - 00194675 3/5/2003 YEE, LARRY 42.00 AP - 00194676 3/5/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 1,189.78 AP - 00194676 3/5/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 1,263.91 AP - 00194677 3/6/2003 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REVENUE & TAX ASS 25.00 Total for Check ID AP: 3,637,734.58 Total for Entity: 3,637,734.58 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 28 Current Date: 03/11/20(i Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 12:47:3 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 28, 2003 Par Market Book % of Days to '(TM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 32,775,925.37 32,775,925.37 32,775,925.37 21.67 1 1 1.918 1.945 Certificates of Deposit/Nag - Bank 1,515,000.~0 1,518,302.70 1,515,000.00 1.00 365 179 1.720 1.744 Commercial Paper - Discount 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 19,972,745.83 13.21 39 20 1.259 1.277 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 97,000,000.00 98,090,837.40 96,968,011.25 64.12 1,549 1,217 4.229 4.288 Investments 151,290,925.37 152,385,065.47 151,231,682.45 100.00% 1,002 785 3.311 3.357 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 402,289.90 402,289.90 402.289.90 I 1 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 1,805.56 1,805.56 Subtotal 4o4,o95.46 4o4,095.46 Total Cash and Investments 151,693,215.27 152,789,160.93 151,635,777.91 1,002 785 3.311 3.357 Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year TO Date Currant Year 441,301.12 3,888,441.78 Average Daily Balance 153,673,455.15 150,117,233.48 Effective Rate of Return 3.74% 3.89% I certify that this raport accurately reflects all City pocled investments and is in cemformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pdcing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the pdor month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The pravisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds. Portfolio CiTY CP , un Date: 03/11/2003 - 17:02 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRe~t V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2003 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 32,775,925.37 32,775,925.37 32,775,925.37 1.945 1.018 1 Subtotal and Average 36,258.668.23 32,775,925.37 32,775,925.37 32,T/5,925.37 1.918 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050EM85 1145 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2002 1,515,000.00 1,518,302.70 1,515,000.00 1.720 1.720 179 08/27/2003 Subtotel arid Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,518,302.70 1,515,000.00 1.720 179 Commercial Paper - Discount 36960MQR7 1182 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 02/12/2003 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 14,978,475.00 1.260 1.262 24 05/25/2003 8923E3QB2 1181 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 02/06/2003 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,994,270.83 1.250 1.251 10 03/11/2003 Subtotal and Average 13,196,510.86 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 10,972,745.83 1.259 20 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331LM88 1127 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/07/2002 2,000,000.00 2,094,375.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 5.129 1,528 05/07/2007 31331LU30 1131 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/11/2002 2,000,000.00 2,001,875~00 1,998,000.00 5.180 5.132 1,563 06/11/2007 31331QAHO 1146 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/04/2002 5,000,000.00 5,000,000~00 5,000,000.00 4.450 4.389 1,648 09/04/2007 31331QHR1 1161 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/07/2002 2,500.000.00 2,535,156.25 2,500,000.00 3.450 3.403 1,347 11/07/2006 31331QJV0 1170 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/27/2002 2,000,000.00 2,008,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.206 1,276 08/25/2006 31331QQH3 1177 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2003 5,(X30,000.00 5,031,250.00 5,000,0~0.00 3.200 3.156 1,241 07/24/2006 3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 2,063,750.00 2,000,0~0.00 5.530 5.454 282 12/08/2003 3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1999 1,000,000.00 1,036,562.50 1,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 326 01/21/2004 3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,179,062.50 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 474 06/17/2004 3133MFBP2 1103 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5/'30/2001 2,000,000.00 2,019,375.00 1,999,062.50 5.800 5.731 1,186 05/30/2(X)6 3133MF7E2 1105 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/06/2001 2,000,000.00 2,020,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.750 5.671 1,193 06/06/2006 3133MTDE5 1155 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/28/2002 1,500,000.00 1,50~,281.25 1,500,000.00 3.300 3.255 972 10/28/2005 3133MTCW6 1162 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/15/2002 2,~B0,000.00 2,00~,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.670 3.621 1,263 08/15/2006 3133MV3K7 1179 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/30/2003 2,500,000.00 2,529,687.50 2,500,000.00 3.200 3.157 1,339 10/30/2006 31331V~/7A5 1180 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/3(~2003 3,000,000.00 3,034,687.50 2,~97,187.50 3.180 3.164 1,339 10/30/2006 3133MVES8 1183 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/07/2003 3,000,000.00 3,036.562.50 3,000,000.00 3.200 3.157 1,347 11/07/2(306 3133MVFC2 1184 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/07/2003 2,000,000.00 2,014,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.200 3.156 1,255 08/07/2006 3133MVL8 1185 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/20/2003 6,000,000.00 6,011,250.00 6,000,000.00 3.300 3.256 1,360 11/20/2006 3133MWFG1 1186 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/28/2003 1,500,000.00 1,507,500.00 1,500,000.00 3.275 3.230 1,460 02/28/2007 3133MWFG1 1187 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/28/2003 1,500,000.00 1,507,500.00 1,500,000.00 3.275 3.230 1,460 02/28/2007 312923MQ5 1081 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2001 1,000,000.00 1,001,655.88 1,000,000.00 5.625 5.548 1,115 03/20/2006 312923SM8 1086 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/10/2001 4,000,000.00 4,014,191.90 4,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 1,136 04/10/2006 312925GT1 1122 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/18/2002 3,000,000.00 3,011,657.87 3,000,000.00 5.020 4.951 962 10/18/2005 Po~olio CITY CP Run Date: 03/11/'~003 - 17:~2 PM (PRF_Pk~) SymRept V6.21 Repoff rec. City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2003 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128XOMH9 1169 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG, CORP. 11/27/2002 7,000,000.00 7,035,076.90 7,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 1,367 11/27/2(X)6 3128X0VN6 1178 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 01/28/2003 2,500.000.00 2,515,959.93 2,4~9,375.00 3.150 3.114 1,245 07/28/2006 31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/1991998 2,000,000,00 2,020,419.92 2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 79 05/19/2003 3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN O4/04/2001 4,000,000.00 4,147,500.00 3,994,375.00 5.3~0 5.259 1,124 03/29/2006 3136FOEVV8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN O4/24/2001 3,000,000,00 3,014,062.50 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,143 0~17/2006 3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24~2001 2,000,000.00 2,097,500,00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,180 05/24/2006 3136F1XU9 1123 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2002 4,000,000.00 4,018,750.00 4,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 968 10/24/2005 3136FIYT1 1125 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/25/2002 2,000,000.00 2,009,375.00 2,000,000.00 5,000 4.932 1,151 04/25/2006 3136F2RL4 1163 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/19/2002 4,000,000.00 4,023,750.00 4,000,000.00 4.200 4.142 1,724 11/19/2007 3136F2UM8 1168 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/27/2002 5,0GO,Q00.00 5,026,562.50 5,0GO,000.00 3.550 3.501 1,367 11/27/2006 3136F2ZJ0 1175 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 01/10/2003 2,000,000.00 2,010,625.00 1,998,480.00 3.250 3.225 1,217 06/30/2006 Subtotel and Average 98,142,811~5 97,000,090.00 98,090,837.40 96,968,011.25 4~29 1~17 Federal Agency Issues - Discount Subtotal and A~erage 4,245,402.42 Total and Average 153,673,455.15 151~90,925.37 152,385,065.47 151~31,682.45 3.311 785 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 2003 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page5 Activity By Type February 1, 2003 through February 28, 2003 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Wlthdmwala Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) SYSOO005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 1.945 9,000,000.00 12,500,000.00 Subtotal 36~75,925.37 9,00~,(X~0.00 12,5~0,060.60 32,775,925.37 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 89,835.94 0.00 Subtotal 312,453.~6 89,835.94 0.00 402~89.90 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Subtotal 1,515,0(X).OO 1 ~15,000.00 Commercial Paper - Discount 369601vlQ R7 1182 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 1.260 02/12/2003 14,978,475.(;O O.CO 8923E3QB2 1181 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 1.250 02/06/2003 4,994,270.83 0.00 Subtotal 0.00 19,972,745.83 0.00 19,972,745.83 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331QHL4 1160 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.550 02/1 2/2003 0.00 7,990,400.00 3133MVES8 1183 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.200 02/07/2003 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133MVFC2 1184 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.200 02/07/2003 2,000,0(X).00 0.00 3133MVL8 1185 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.300 02/20/2003 6,000,000.00 0,00 3133MWFG1 1186 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.275 02/28/2003 1,500,000.00 0.00 3133MWFG1 1187 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.275 02/'28/2003 1,500,000.00 0.00 3129242D4 1119 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.750 02/06/2003 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X0GW3 1166 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.150 02~1/~003 0.00 4,000,000.00 3128X0JR1 1167 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.250 02/26/2003 0.00 3,000,000.00 Subtotal 100,958,411.25 14,000,~.8~ 17,~.400.{X~ 96,968,011 ~5 Federal Agency Issues - Discount 313384BP3 1173 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.230 02~7/2003 0.CO 4,995,900.00 313588BU8 1172 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.240 02/12/~003 0.00 6,991,078.89 313588BP9 1176 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.200 02~7/~)03 0.00 1,999,000.00 Subtotal 13,985,978.89 0.00 13,9~5,978.89 0.60 Total 153,047,769.47 43,~62,581.77 44,476,37&89 151,633,972.35 po~lfolio CiTY Date: 03/11/2003 - 17:(~ PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept v6.21 Report Ver. 5,00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended January 31, 2003 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost .Bond Issue PayinR A.qent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.80% $ 257,311.78 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.80% 243,896.04 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.83% 1,573,95 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 502,781.77 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ 0.04 Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 0.80% 583,177.83 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.80% 1,095,570.22 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% 9.32 Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.80% 126,666.63 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,805,424.04 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,308,205.81 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~ i:lfinancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 3/12/2003 3.'33 PM R A N C H 0 C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Report DALE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engine SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000' WEST TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1407176 (MEASURE "1" FUNDS) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' West and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND ! ANALYSIS: The Banyan Street Widening scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, widening the north half of Banyan, excavation, cutting and grading of existing slope, installation of asphalt pavement over aggregate base, saw cutting and removal of existing A.C. pavement, cold planing, crack sealing, rubberized overlay, concrete curb and gutter, concrete sidewalk, street lights, installation of chain link fence along Flood Control right-of-way, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Account No. 11763035650/1407176. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for the Banyan Street Widening is $415,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for Mamh 25, 2003 and April 8, 2003, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 15, 2003. Respe~c~lly submitted, City Engineer .35 RESOLUTION NO. ~),.~" O~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000+- WEST IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000_+ WEST". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 15, 2003, sealed bids or proposals for the "BANYAN STREET WIDENING" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of BANYAN STREET WIDENING." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and RESOLUTION NO. March 19, 2003 Page 2 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he' employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. RESOLUTION NO. March 19, 2003 Page 3 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an RESOLUTION NO. March 19, 2003 Page 4 additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish, a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. in accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). RESOLUTION NO. March 19, 2003 Page 5 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 19th day of March, 2003. Publish Dates: March 25, 2003 and April 8, 2003 VICINITY MAP FONT~ AT&SFRR H.TA ONT, aRJ'O ,-~o F~W^~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA O BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVE. TO 2000' WEST ;// N.T.S. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~GINEI~I~ING D 1~ p A 1~ T ~i'l~ N T DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Membem of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ci~ Manager F~M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jer~ A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~ SU~E~: REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Ci~ Council reject all bids received for the constm~ion of the Fisher Drive Street Improvements from East Avenue to Mulber~ Street as non-responsive to the needs of the Ci~. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Febma~ 25, 2003, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $225,587.00. All bids received significantly exceeded the Engineer's Estimate. Staff will redesign and again request pe~ission to advedise this proje~ for bid. R~cffully submiffed~ ~ City [n~ineer W30:J~D/~O:Is ~chment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 25, 2003 /IPPARENTLOWBIDDER Fisher Drive Street Improvements ENGINEERS COST Laird Construction Co., from East Avenue to Mulberry Street ESTIMATE 4-Con Engineering, Inc. All American Asphalt Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS ClearmgandGmbbing $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $46,906.75 $46,906.75 2. 1 LS Remove GuardRail $675.0(3 $675.00 $750.00 $750.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 3. 8 £A Remove Tree $1,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,030.00 $8,240.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 4. 942 SF Remove PCC Drive at Channel $6.00 $5,652.00 $2.00 $1,884.00 $3.15 $2,967.30 $2.00 $1,884.00 5. 720 SF Remove4" PCC Sidewalk $2.00 $1,440.00 $2.00 $1,440.00 $3.15 $2,268.00 $1.50 $1,080.00 6. 662 CY Excavation(F) $6.00 $3,972.00 $55.00 $36,410.00 $51.60 $34,159.20 $5.00 $3,310.00 7. 1788 CY Fill(F) $4.00 $7,152.00 $7.00 $12,$16.00 $22.30 $39,872.40 $10.00 $17,880.00 8. 1: EA Relocate WM $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $2,120.00 $2,120.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 9. 66£ TON ,~onstruct AC pavement inc. removals $33.00 $21,780.00 $46.00 $30,360.00 $55.30 $36,498.00 $50.00 $33,000.00 I0. 60¢ TON 2onstmct 4" CAB $17.00 $10,200.00 $16.00 $9,600.00 $21.00 $12,600.00 $15.00 $9,000.00 'Type I Decorative Cone Retain Wall w/new 6' CtL t~nce 11. 2673 SF ~yptenl~6B Conc Retain Wall (at channcl) w/ relocated 6, $30.00 $80,190.00 $48.00 $128,304.00 $28.00 $74,844.00 $72.25 $193,124.25 12. 131 LF car ..... t,, $43.00 $5,633.00 $100.00 $13,100.00 $143.00 $18,733.00 $200.00 $26,200.00 13. 2496 LF Construct 8" curb and 24" gut~r inc. transitions and ...... is $13.00 $32,448.00 $13.75 $34,320.00 $19.80 $49,420.80 $10.00 $24,960.00 14. EA Construct 7'Catchbasin $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,250.00 $5,250.00 15. 8 LF Construct 18" CP $120.00 $960.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 $370.00 $2,960.00 $100.00 $800.00 16. 6 LF Construct PCC Mow Cuxb $9.00 $54.00 $20.00 $120.00 $10.30 $61.80 $15.00 $90.00 17. 659 SF Conslxuct Cobblestone Hardscape $I0.00 $6,590.00 $10.00 $6,590.00 $12.90 $8,501.10 $12.50 $8,237.50 18. 2614 SF Constmct4"PCCSidewalk $2.50 $6,535.00 $2.50 $6,535.00 $3.00 $7,842.00 $2.75 $7,188.50 19. 566 SF Construct PCC Drive approach $7.00 $3,962.00 $3.00 $1,698.00 $6.10 $3,452.60 $4.00 $2,264.00 20. 324 SF Constrcut PCC Ramp $6.00 $1,944.00 $3.00 $972.00 $3.05 $988.20 $4.00 $1,296.00 21. 425 LF Install6' Chain Link Fence inc. Removals $12.00 55,100.00 $15.00 $6,375.00 $29.60 $12,580.00 $1.00 $425.00 22. 1 EA Adjust Drop lnlet to Grade $450.00 $450.00 $1,000.00$1,000.00$1,580.00$1,580.00$1,500.001 $1,500.00 23. 1 EA Adjust MHto grade $350.00 $350.0C $350.00 $350.0C $250.00 $250.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 24. I LS PVC Sleeves $1,200.00 $1,200.0C $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 25. 1 LS Conduit system per SCE plan $5,400.00 $5,400.0C $9,000.00 $9,000.0C $7,900.00 $7,900.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 26. 1 LS Traffic Conlxol $1,000.00 $1,000.012 $5,000.012 $5,000.0C $5,130.00 $5,130.00 $6,250.00 $6,250.00 27. 1 LS Storm Water Pollut/on Prevention Plan $8,000.00 $8,000.0C $600.012 $600.012 $6,600.00 $6,600.00 $500.00 $500.00 "~ TOTAL $225,587.012 $338,524.012 $360,768.4~ $416,146.00 BID SUMMARY FOR Bm OPENING FEBRUARY 25, 2003 Fisher Drive Street Improvements Olivas Valdez Inc. E.G.N. Construction, Inc. R.J. Noble Company from East Avenue to Mulberry Street UNIT UNIT Bm 2ORRECTEI UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing and Gmbbing $3,700.00 $3,700.0C $26,500.00 $26,500.00 $26,500.00 $51,000.00 $51,000.00 2. 1 LS Remove GuardRail $1,620.00 $1,620.0(1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3. 8 EA Remove Tree $350.00 $2,800.0C $1,150.00 $9,200.00 $9,200.00 $1,200.00 $9,600.00 4. 942 SF Remove PCC Drive at Channe! $2.05 $1,931.1(1 $1.85 $1,742.70 $1,742.70 $2.50 $2,355.00 5. 720 SF Remove 4" PCC Sidewalk $2.90 $2,088.0C $1.25 $900.00 $900.00 $1.70 $1,224.00 6. 662 CY Excavation(F) $30.50 $20,191.0C $2'6.00 $17,212.00 $17,212.00 $16.00 $10,592.00 7. 1788 CY Fill(F) $27.45 $49,080.6C $9.87 $17,647.56 $17,647.56 $16.00 $28,608.00 8. 1 EA Relocate WM $1,000.00 $1,000.0(1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 9. 660 TON Construct ACPavement inc. removals $75.00 $49,500.0(1 $48.50 $72,010.00 $32,010.00 $46.00 $30,360.00 10. 600 TON Construct4" CAB $25.00 $15,000.0(1 $18.90 $11,340.00 $11,340.00 $28.00 $16,800.00 11. 2673 SF Type l Decorat~ve Conc Retain Wall w/ new 6' C/L tence $50.50 $134,986.5(1 $82.82' $221,377.90 $221,377.86 $80.00 $213,840.00 12. 131 LF Typcbl3ConcRetainWall(atehannel)w/relocated6' $251.90 $32,998.90 $318.00 $41,658.00 $41,658.00 $100.00 $13,100.00 13. 2496 LF Construct 9I) curb and 24" gu~er inc. transitions and r~,~o,,~ $23.20 $57,907.2(1 $12.00 $29,952.00 $29,952.00 $10.00 $24,960.00 14. 1 EA Constxuct 7' Catchbasin $3,500.00 $3,500.0(1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 15. 8 LF Construct 18"CP $354.30 $2,834.4(1 $175.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $370.00 $2,960.00 16. 6 LF Construct PCC Mow Curb $39.00 $234.00 $14.00 $84.00 $84.00 $11.00 $66.00 17. 659 SF Construct CobblestoneHardscape $10.10 $6,655.9(1 $15.00 $9,885.00 $9,885.00 $14.00 $9,226.00 18. 2614 SF Construct 4" PCC SidewaLk $2.55 $6,665.70 $2.41 $6,299.74 $6,299.74 $3.10 $8,103.40 19. 566' SF Construct PCC Drive approach $5.20 $2,943.2(1 $2.95 $1,669.70 $1,669.70 $4.00 $2,264.00 20. 32411 SF ConstxcutPCCRamp $8.90 $2,883.60 $4.00 $1,296.00 $1,296.00 $6.00 $1,944.00 21. 4251 LF Install 6' Chain Link Fence inc. Removals $31.30 $13,302.50 $18.00 $7,650.00 $7,650.00 $30.00 $12,750.00 22. 11 EA AdjustDrop Inlet toGrade $480.00 $480.0(1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 23. 1 EA Adjust MH to grade $375.00 $375.0(1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $800.00 $800.00 24.1 LS PVC Sleeves $3,800.00 $3,800.0(1 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 25. LS Conduit system per SCE plan $8,000.00 $8,000.0(1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 26. LS Traffic Contxol $9,740.00 $9,740.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.01] 27. LS Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TOTAL I $438,817.60 $468,924.60 $468,924.56 $477,052.40 Page 9~ BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 25, 2003 Fisher Drive Street Improvements Vance Corporation from East Avenue to Mulberry Street UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing and Grubbing $28,000.00 $28,000.00 2. 1 LS Remove Guard Rail $1,500.00 $1,500.00 3. 8 EA Remove Tree $1,100.00 $8,800.00 4. 942 SF Remove PCC Drive at Channel $6.00 $5,652.00 5. 720 SF Remove4" PCC Sidewalk $3.00 $2,160.00 6. 662 CY Excavation(F) $11.50 $7,613.00 7. 1788 CY Fill(F) $10.00 $17,880.00 8. I EA Relocate WM $1,200.00 $1,200.00 9. 660 TON Construct AC pavement inc. removals $57.00 $37,620.00 10. 600 TON Construct 4" CAB $21.00 $12,600.00 11. 2673 SF lype l Decorative Conc Retain Wall w/ new 6' C/L t~nce $86.00 $229,878.00 Type §B Cone Kctain Wall (at channel) w/relocated 6' $290.00 $37,990.00 12. 131 LF f'/I fence on tnn Construct S" curb and 24" guacr inc. transitions and $12.00 $29,952.00 13. 2496 LF removals 14. 1 EA Construct 7' Catchbasin $6,000.00 $6,000.00 15. 8 LF Construct 18"CP $200.00 $1,600.00 16 6 LF Construct PCC Mow Curb $11.00 $66.00 1T 659 SF Construct Cobblestone Hardscape $9.00 $5,931.00 18 2614 SF !Construct 4" PCC Sidewalk $6.00 $15,684.00 19. 566 SF Eoustmct PCC Drive approach $5.00 $2,830.00 20 324 SF Eonstrcnt PCC Ramp $6.00 $1,944.00 21 425 LF Install 6' Chain Link Fence inc. Removals $29.00 $12,325.00 22., EA Adjust Drop Inlet to Grade $1,000.00 $1,000.00 23.I EA Adjust Mit to grade $1,000.00 $1,000.00 24.I La PVC Sleeves $800.00 $800.0C 25.i LS Conduit system per SCE plan $9,000.00 $9,000.0fl 26.1 LS traffic Control $5,000.00 $5,000.012 27 LS Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan $3,500.00 $3,500.012 TOTAI. $487,525.012 Page 3 PROJECT LOCATION AlmondRd' "/,'H ~t_:_ ~ iJ ~ ~,:?h ~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~~ Fre~ ~.c.o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / CUCAMONGA CI~ OF ~CHO CUC~MONGA FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM ~T AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET ~ VICINITY MAP I~ A N C H O C U C a M 0 N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES S Repor TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Pauia Pachon, Management Analyst Ill DATE: March 19, 2003 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM OLD BALDY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOR A WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES FOR THEIR SCOUT-O-RAMA AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER AND ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX SOCCER FIELDS ON APRIL 26TM AND 27TM, 2003 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America for a waiver of rental fees for their Scout-O-Rama at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex soccer fields on April 26th and 27th, 2003. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff has recently received a letter of request from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America for waiver of their fees for their upcoming Scout-O-Rama scheduled for the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex on April 26th and 27th. As noted in their letter of request, the Old Baldy Council is a non-profit organization that serves over 10,000 youth in the Inland Empire (approximately 1,500 youngsters from the city of Rancho Cucamonga). The event is a daylong activity where youngsters can highlight their skills to the public. An event of this nature generally draws 3,500 families. The event includes numerous activity and information booths, as well as a sleepover activity for the scouts. In reviewing this request for fee waiver against Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Fee Waiver Policies for the Epicenter, staff has CI~Y COUNCIL OLD BALDY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MARCH ]9, 2003 determined that Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America does meet the criteria required for a waiver of the facility rental fee but does not meet the criteria for a waiver of City service charges. The attached table illustrates the results of staff's review. FISCAL IMPACT Should the City Council approve Old Baldy Council Boy Scout of America's request for waiver of rental fees for their Scout-O-Rama, the total fiscal impact to the City of this action would be $530.00. According to Resolution Number 99-049, Old Baldy Council Boy Scout of America would still be required to pay their direct service charges of $282.71 (public works personnel, facility materials and supplies, lights, etc.), a security damage deposit of $1,000.00, any applicable taxes and provide the City comprehensive public liability insurance coverage in the amount of $1 million dollars. Kevin Mc 'die Commun ' Services Director Attachment I:tCOMMSERVtCouncil&BoardslCityCounciltStaffReports[2OO31MtBaldyScottORama3.19.03. doc -2- Evaluation Tool for Review of Requests for Waiver of Rental Fees and Direct Services Charges for the Epicenter* Requesting Organization: Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America Event Date(s): April 26th and 27th, 2003 Requested Facility: Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex - Soccer Fields Criteria Applicable to Facility Rental Fee Waiver/Reduction Meets Does Not Criteria Meet Criteria Entity conducts substantial business activities within the City of X Rancho Cucamonga. Entity is a properly formed California non-profit organization X holding a current City business license. The event for which the facility is to be used and for fee waiver X ~s requested is: (1) not limited in attendance on the basis of any discriminatory criteria; (2) is not designed or intended to solicit, encourage, to persuade or induce membership into the sponsoring entity or financial support; and (3) is intended and 31anned to appeal to and benefit all residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Criteria Applicable to Waiver of Direct City Service Meets Does Not Charges for Community Special Events: Criteria Meet Criteria That all of the above criteria are met. X That the proposed Community Special Event will provide a X direct and tangible benefit to a program or service offered by the City. That the activity will not unreasonably subject the City to X foreseeable liability. That the sponsoring entity will positively identify and advertise X the event and the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a regional or greater scale and the Community Special Event is of a nature that will convey a positive image for the City. That the event is designed, intended and organized in a X manner that will either result in the substantial patronage of a significant number of businesses located within the City and/or involve participation of numerous community organizations. That the event will offer the citizens of the City of Rancho X Cucamonga opportunities to participate in unique community activities and events that are not otherwise available within the City by or through the City or any other private party. That the event is not in conflict with or similar to any other X event that the City is participating in or assisting in any manner. That the event is not designed or intended to produce or result X in a profit for any involved entity. · Based upon City Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Sen, ice Charge Waiver polk:les for the Epicenter. h~MMSERv~c~unci~&B~ards~ityC~unci~Sta~Rep~rts~2~3~EvaiutionT~MtBa~dyBSA3~ 19.03. don , F~h,27. 2003 3:05PM OLD BALDY COUNCIL BSA No.2719 P. 2/2 February 27, 2003 The Honorable William Alexander Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Dear Nayor Ale~y3nder: The Old Ba!dy Council, Boy Scouts of America will be holding a weekend event at the Epicenter Complex on April 26m and 27~ for our annual Scout-O-Rama. The Old Baldy Council is a 50:~{c)3 non-profit organizaUon that serves over 10,000 youth In the Znland Empire. We currently serve approximately :L,500 youth in the clues of Rancho Cucamonga and Alta Loma. We do have a not-for-profit busirfess I!cense in the dty of Rancho Cqcam, p~ga. The Scout-O-Rama Is a daylong event where the youth highlight their skills to the public. This event draws on the average of 3,500 adults and famiiies and is an excellent vehue for local businesses to advertise through our $cout-O-Rama program, which Is given to each attendee. The event has numerous activity and informatJon booths and enables us to work wroh the community and government organizations to give them an opportunity to share their message with the community. These. organizations include local law enforcement, fire depafb.ents and civic groups among others. Zt a~so allows us to share program ideas with the Scouting units that we serve, and it provides a AJn activity in which our Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, Venturers and Explorers can partJdpate. Since the Old Baldy Council is a non-profit organization we are requesting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga waive all or part of the following lees: Base Rent'(2 soccer fields) $530.00, Maintenance Expenses $282.71 for a total .of $812.71 We appreciate your consideration of this request and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Assistant Scout Executive R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A (~OMMU NIT¥ SERVICES StaffRepor TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III DATE: Mamh 19, 2003 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF CITY CO-SPONSORSHiP OF THE INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN ALL STAR GAME AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER STADIUM ON JUNE 5TM (PRACTICE GAME) AND JUNE 10, 2003 (GAME DAY). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the attached agreement from the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin for a co-sponsorship of the 2003 Ali-Star High School Baseball game on June 10, 2003 (practice game on June 5th) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has participated as a co-sponsor of the annual Ali-Star Game for the past nine years. This event provides an opportunity to bring together 30 of the Inland Valley's premiere high school baseball players to compete at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. Team members are divided on a North/South split with Interstate 10 being the dividing line. Participants come from the following schools: Alta Loma, Ambassador Christian, Ayala, Bonita, Boys Republic, Calvary Baptist, Chaffey, Chino, Claremont, Damien, Diamond Bar, Don Lugo, Eisenhower, Etiwanda, Fontana, Fontana A.B. Miller, Ganesha, Gamy, Jurupa Valley, La Verne Lutheran, Montclair, Nomo, Ontario, Ontario- Christian, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, San Dimas, Upland and Webb. As a collaborative activity between the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Quakes Baseball and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City is requested to, once again, co-sponsor the activity and provide the following: · :. use of the Stadium and parking ama on June 5th (practice) and June 10th (game). o:. provide visitor's and locker room for the game day. · ~. arrange for security at the stadium on game night. CiIY COUNCIL CO-SPONSORSHIP OF DA~LY BULLETIN ALL-STAR GAME MARCH 19, 2003 · **. provide field propping and facility maintenance and clean up of the Stadium. Specific areas of responsibility have also been outlined in the Agroement between the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the Quakes. If approved, the event will be marketed noting the collaboration among the sponsors. Net proceeds from this year's game have been designated for the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Send a Kid to Camp program. The Daily Bulletin's request is a request for a collaborative agreement between the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Quakes Baseball and the City to provide an Ali-Star High School Baseball Game. This roquest is not strictly a waiver of City fees and charges, but rather provides the City with a sponsorship opportunity to be part of an event that benefits both the community as a whole and the youngsters of the Inland Empire. Staff feels this program should be considerod separately from the fee and cost waiver resolution passed by City Council in Mamh 1999. The nine-year history between the City and this event has provided the City with co-sponsorship recognition as well as revenues from concessions and admissions taxes. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that City Council approve the collaboration with the Daily Bulletin and the Quakes to provide the 2003 Inland Valley All Star High School Baseball Game on June 10, 2003, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium and to execute the attached agroement between the Daily Bulletin and the City. FISCAL IMPACT: City expenses of approximately $3,850 for the benefit event would be offset in part by the admissions tax generated by ticket sales and concession revenues of approximately $1,000, received from the event. Kev~ McArdle Community Services Diroctor Attachment ht¢OMMSERV~Council&Boards~Ci~,ouncil~$taffReports~2OO31DailyBulletinAIlStars3.19.03, doc -2- INLAND VALLEY Daily Bulletin ' 2041 fast iour~ Street,, Onta~o, C~ 91764 '(909) 987-6397 · m {909) 989-~977 January 14, 2003 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Paula, The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin is again requesting to form a partnership in presenting the Inland Valley High School All Star Baseball game to recognize young men who will be graduating seniors. The year 2003 marks the tenth year that the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Daily Bulletin .... have formed this partnership to showcase these young men and provide an affordable event for baseball fans and families. Resulting from the success of this game, we did a pilot project in June of 2002 offering an Ali-Star Girls Softball game in partnership with Big League Dreams. This proved successful and will now become part of the Daily Bulletin commitment to the communities that it serves. Note the change on the agreement under "schools eligible for player selection." We have added two new schools; Jurupa Valley and Narco, giving us a total of 30 eligible high schools in the selection processs. As new schools are built and the service area of the Daily Bulletin broadens we will add those high schools to our eligibility list. We are requesting the fees to be waived for the use of the stadium and parking for both the player practice, June 5 and the game, June 10 as well as arrange for the security for the night of the game, use of the visitors locker room, field and stadium maintenance. The City will receive recognition as joint presenter of the game on all print material as well as PSA's night of game. Our ten year relationship in presenting this game has showcased 483 outstanding young baseball players, resulting in scholarships, and even signings of professional contracts for these young men. More than 19,500 families and fans have viewed the game. The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin takes great pride in the success of our partnership over the years and in being one of the presenters of this game. Should you have any questions regarding this request please feel free to contact me at 909- 483-9351. ler Community Relations Manager Seming the Communities of Chine * Chioo Hills · Cluremonl * Diamoad Bm' Fontana · La Veme * Montdail · Ontario · Pomona · Rancho Cucemonga · Rialto ·'San Olmos 2003 All-Star High School Baseball Game Partnership Agreement Proposal: A collaborative agreement between Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide an Inland Va/Icy All-Star High School Baseball Game. Date/Time: Game to be held on Tuesday, June 10, 2003 Gates Open at 5:30, First pitch at 6:30 Ticket Sales: Ticket prices will be $4.00 for green box seats (reserved). $3.00 for red seats and bleachers (festival seating). A special "two for one" coupon offer on general admission tickets, advance sales, will be available to make the event affordable for all. Net proceeds from the game to go to the Daily Bulletin Send A Kid to Camp Program, a not for profit organization. General Site: Only main gate to be open for admission. Players, staff and VIP to park in lot A Quakes dugout to be south team. Visiting dugout to be north team Limited concessionaire opening on the concourse · Terrace seats to be closed unless ticket sales warrant opening. ' Schools eligible for player selection will be: Alta Loma Fontana A.B. Miller Ambassador Christian Ganesha Ayala Gamy Bonita Jurupa Valley Boys Republic La Veme Lutheran Calvary Baptist Montclair Charley Norco Chino Ontario Claremont Ontario-Christian Damien Pomona Diamond Bar Rancho Cucamonga Don Lugo Rialto Eisenhower San Dimas Etiwanda Upland Fontana Webb Teams will be on a North-South split with I-lO being the dividing line. .... Some adjustments may need to be made to make teams even in terms of enrollment. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin will provide: * Player liability release. * Insurance as required by contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. * Electronic and print media notification. * Selection process for the 48 players and 12 coaches. * Four umpires ..... * Reserved and Unreserved ticket sales at Daily Bulletin lobby. * A special sports feature published prior to the game. * Player recognition package for each player and coach. Package will include, hat, commemorative ball, certificate and photo card. * Reception for the players, their parents, and coaches and sponsors. * In-paper advertising to promote the event (approx. value $10,000.) * An advertiser sponsored game program to be sold at the game. * Print unreserved tickets for the game with one advertiser on the back. * Arrange for on site paramedic staffing * Provide for player, event staff and VIP parking pass and signage. * Name recognition of all collaborating partners on printed materials and introduction of the sponsors the night of the game. * Credentials - photo and press. * Pre-game and post-game coverage of the event. * Necessary personnel to staff turnstyles, and sell game night tickets. Request of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: * Waive fees for the use of stadium and parking area on June 5, practice & June 10, 2003, game: "' Ticket sales to be confn-med with the city one week prior to game. If advance stiles exceed 5,000 ' in number, parking will be paid by the Daily Bulletin in an amount not to exceed $3,000. * Provide stadium for player practice on Thursday, June 5. * Visitor locker room for the game. * Arrange for security at the stadium on game night. * Maintenance and clean-up of the stadium. * Prepping the field for practice, pre and post-game. Inland. Valley Daily Bulletin Date Collaboration proposal accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date City of Rancho Cucamonga THE CITY 0 F I~AN Cll 0 Cl] CAM 0 N CA S :ff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 21, 2003, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 21, 2003, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: It is recommended that the assessment rates remain at existing levels for all Landscape Maintenance District for FY 2003/2004. The water conservation efforts implemented within the landscape maintenance districts continue to help keep costs down, allowing the assessment rates to remain at the same levels as the rates for FY 2002/2003. In many of the districts, back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some district, an increase in the amount of landscaped area has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. However, this cost will be offset by corresponding increases in revenue received from new developments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This offsetting mechanism still holds true and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2003/2004 rates: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS Mamh 19, 2003 Page 2 Assessment Rate Landscape Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit LMD # 1 - General City $ 92.21 LMD # 2 - Victoria Planned Community $422.00 LMD # 3A - Hyssop $413.74 LMD # 3B - Commerical/Industrial $352.80 LMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50 LMD # 5 - Tot Lot $113.29 LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community $246.97 LMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $307.05 LMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $151.45 LMD # 9 - Lower Etiwanda $375.91 LMD # 10- Rancho Etiwanda $597.09 Respectfully submitted, William O. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~),.~-~)~'/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OFASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. OZ-(~&~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more Particularly described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 19, 2003 Page 2 No. 10", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Enqineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearinq SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 21,2003, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2003/2004. Landscapinq and Liqhtin.q Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7.: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCA~IONGA DATE: March 19, 2003 ~ Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 21, 2003, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 21, 2003, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts have been increased due to Southern California Edison electric rate increases. In the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY 2003/2004 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2003/2004 rates that are recommended to remain the same as FY 2002/2003 rates. The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 19, 2003 Page 2 Assessment Rate Street Li.qhtinq Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit SLMD # I - Arterial $17.77 SLMD # 2 - General City Local $39.97 SLMD # 3 - Victoria Planned Community $47.15 SLMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned'Community $28.96 SLMD # 5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60 SLMD # 6 - Commemial/Industrial $51.50 SLMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $33.32 SLMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $193.75' *This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. Respectfully submitted, William O. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said reports and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said reports, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the' incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said reports are hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. ~--~' ~ ~f/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenan(~e (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the reports of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, i,s of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the. expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7" and "Map of Street Lighting CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 19, 2003 Page 2 Maintenance District No. 8" indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment districts and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual reports of the City Engineer, which reports indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The reports titled "Annual Engineer's Report" are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said reports is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 21,2003, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2003/2004. Landscaping and Liqhtinq Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G a E NGIN EEI~IIq G DI~PAE!T~IEI~T Staff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 21, 2003, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 21, 2003,to levy the annual assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). It is recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in this district for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 March 19, 2003 Page 2 Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. it is recommended that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $52.00 Less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $182.00 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00 25.01 acres and Larger $1,300.00 Res_~ctfully submitted, ~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~}~-¢,- O~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows:' 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. ~)Z"' ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARKAND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2003/2004 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said district. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement) in connection with said district. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 19, 2003 Page 2 Report of Enqineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2003, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and ail persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2003/2004. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any pretest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll, such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscapinq and Liqhtinq Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. R a N C H O C U C A M O N G A 1~ NGINI~I~OIN G DI~DAI~Tr, II~N t Staff Report DA'rE: March 19, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00820, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND AZUSA COURT, SUBMITTED BY FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2002-00820, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court, in the Empire Lakes Planning Area X, was approved by the City Planner on October 31, 2002. This project is for the construction of a parking lot of 195 parking spaces. The Developer, Fairway Business Centre, LLC, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Cash Bond $14,100.00 Labor and Material Cash Bond: $ 7,000~00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. ?/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00820 March 19, 2003 Page 2 The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments ?2- RANCHO CUCAMONGA ONTARIO CITY OF " . rr~:~u~:~~_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION · SOLUT ON NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI ~IFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00820 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 19, 2003, by Fairway Business Centre, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. ~,~" t~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00820 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIlD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the '°territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2002-00820 March 19, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article xmD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FAIRWAY BUSINESS CENTRE, The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 14 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14647, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 177 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 90 TO 96, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; AND AS AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1995, INSTRUMENT NO. 95-369354, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Assessor's Parcel No. 0209-272-21-0-000 The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXHIBIT "A:Z,~u ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 I Pa r. 15 Par. I · '": ' §J69 Pa~ R ~x~ ~ Porl4 · ~72 AC CITY OF RANCItO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: DRC2002-00820 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 3* ......... SLD#6 --- 3* ......... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L3B ......... 20+8* *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 3.57 7.14 3.57 3.57 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment uhit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and ll~e llnit Tv'ne llnit~ lTnit~ Factnr Ii'nits llnit R~v~nn~ Comm/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00820) is: 3.57 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $1,259.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal'year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l.and Tiaa I/nit Tyne llnit~ lTnil~ Factnr Ilnit~ Ilnit Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Family Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00820) is: 3.57 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $63.44 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Tl~e~ llnit Tvn~ Ilnit~ Tlnit~ F~actnr llnit~ llnit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,fi29.64 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00820) is: 3.57 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $183.50 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E NG IN EEI~ING DE PAI~TMI~N T SttffReport DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY.' Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJEC'F: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 16116, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC., APN: 225-181-04, 06, 07, 08 and 43 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16116, accepting the subject agreements and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract No. 16116, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2002 for the development of 48 single family lots on 37.4 acres on land. The Developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Master Plan Storm Drain: Faithful Performance Bond: $750,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $375,250.00 CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16116 March 19, 2003 Page 2 Off-Site Street Improvements: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,086,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 543,150.00 On-Site Street Improvements: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,241,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 620,750.00 Copies of the agreements, securities, and Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~ William O. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:sc Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI.IFORNIA APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16116, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16116, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. and consisting of 48 single family homes located at the southwest coreer of Banyan Street and East Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 10, 2002 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16116 is the final map of the division of Land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into Improvement Agreements guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreements and said Improvement Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16116 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ .~-' ~ 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ? AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 16116 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIllD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XlIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all o~ the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 16116 March 19, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIilD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvemen!. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Ten-itory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT 16116, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL A:. LOTS 1 AND 8 AND THE EAST ¼ OF LOTS 2 AND 7, BLOCK "E", ACCORDING TO THE PREI.IMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, SAID CORNER BEING IN THE WEST LINE OF EAST AVENUE, 66 FEET WIDE; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 50' 30" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1,138.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG. 09' 21" EAST PARAI J ~F.L TO SAID EAST AVENUE, 145.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 50' 30" EAST 138.39 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID WEST LliNE OF EAST AVENUE, SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 0 DEG. 09' 21" EAST, 145.00 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 09' 21" WEST, 145.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THE WEST ~A OF LOT 7, BLOCK "E", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 170 FEET; THENCE EAST 120 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 170 FEET; THENCE WEST 120 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit "A" continued PARCEL C: LOTS 5 AND 6, AND THE WEST sA OF LOT 7, BLOCK E, ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAI JFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 170 FEET; THENCE EAST 120 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 170 FEET; THENCE WEST 120 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT 11549-1 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 172 OF MAPS, PAGES 30 THROUGH 32, INCLUSIVE. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels witlfin that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD gl)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area Of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: Tract 16116 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 --- 15 ......... SLD # 7 32 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 7 28,472 7946 6847 22 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 7 L Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Noxth Etiwanda): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1454 1.00 1454 $307.05 $446,450.70 Comm~nd. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $ 3,070.50 TOTAL $449,521.20 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16116) is: 37.4 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $11,483.67 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l~and ll~ Unit Tvn~ Unit~ Unit~ Factor Nnit~ Unit R~v~nn~ Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Family Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16116) is: 37.4 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $664.60 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I~nd lT~e Unit Tv'ne I lnits lInlt~ Factor TTnit~ Tlnit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1084 1.00 1084 $33.32 $36,118.88 Comm//nd Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $36,452.08 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16116) is: 37.4 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $1,246.17 Annual Assessment c-2 R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT $ fRepor DATE: March 19, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~'0 FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ,~J~ BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RONALD AND JANE GEARY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, TO ACQUIRE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Ronald and Jane Geary, Husband and Wife, to Acquire Street Right-of-Way from the property located at 6012 East Avenue, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The agreement provides for the acquisition of 16,990 square feet of street right-of-way dedication in order to construct the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23rd Street needed to provide access to the proposed Fire Station No.176. The street improvements are scheduled to begin construction in April. This portion of right-of-way is essential for the completion of the project. Negotiations with the property owner resulted in a mutually agreed upon amount of $10,000 ($0.59 per square foot).. The Geary's have executed the acquisition agreement attached herewith. Respectfully submitted, William'J, O'Nei' '1 - City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map/Agreement to Acquire Right-cf-Way PROJECT ~I~ ONTARIO C,~ LIMIT LOCATION ~ VICINITY MAP ~ T H E C I T Y © F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Stafl Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS (CO 01-018) CONCERNING RECORDS RETENTION Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve this amendment to contract CO 01- 018 with Nestor Traffic Systems. This would be the first amendment to the contract that was originally executed on March 7, 2001. This contract covers the operation of our automated red light enforcement system. This specific amendment modifies the provisions for records retention. Back,qround In 2002, the California State Auditor reviewed Red Light Programs throughout the state. One of the recommendations of that audit report was that all contracts have specific language covering records retention. This amendment addresses that recommendation from the State Auditor. This amendment requires data for citations that do not meet issuance criteria and are discarded to be destroyed 60 days from the date of they ara discarded. Also, all data for citations that are issued and subsequently dismissed shall be destroyed 80 days from the date of dismissal. Page 2 March 19, 2003 APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS (CO 0t-018) CONCERNING RECORDS RETENTION All data associated with citations that are paid, have bail forfeited, or have trials are to be retained for three years from the date of issuance. After this three-year period, this data is to be destroyed within six months of the end of the three-year period. Staff recommends the approval of this amendment. Re.s.~ectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. MUNICIPALITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL VIOLATION VIDEO-MONITORING SYSTEM AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a place of business at 400 Massasoit Ave, Suite 200, East Providence, RI 02914 ("Nestor"), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, having an address of 10500 Civic Center Drive, PO Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (the "City" and together with Nestor, the "Parties" and each singularly a "Party") entered into a Traffic Signal Violation Video- Monitoring System Agreement dated the 7th day of March, 2001 (the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the City desires to modify the Agreement to address retention periods for citation data; The Parties hereby agree to enter into this Addendum Number One ("Addendum One") dated this 19th day of March, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants between the Parties, it is agreed as follows: All citation data (including violator information and video evidence) ("Data") contained in red light citations that do not meet initial issuance criteria, and are subsequently discarded, shall be purged from the electronic database within sixty (60) days from the date of discard. All Data contained in red light citations that are initially issued and later dismissed, either by a reviewing officer, or by the court (unless pending appeal), shall be destroyed within sixty (60) days from the date of dismissal. All Data contained in red light citations in which the citation is paid, bail is forfeited, or after trial, shall be retained for a period of three years from the date of issuance and then destroyed within six (6) months of the end of such three year period. The method of destruction of all citation Data shall be in a manner such that it cannot be reproduced or identified in any physical or electronic form. City or its authorized representative, upon reasonable notice, shall have the right, during normal business hours, to examine and audit any and all records, books, papers, and documents related to the destruction of Data by NTS to the extent City believes necessary to assure verification and compliance. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written. Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. By: Name: Nigel P. Hebborn Title: EVP - Chief Financial Officer City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA By: Name: William J. Alexander Title: Mayor Attest: Name: Debra J. Adams Title: City Clerk T H E C I T Y O F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE WORK-STUDY PROGRAM Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve this agreement with California State University San Bernardino for our participation in their work-study program. BackRround The work-study program provides opportunities for college students to work with the City in a variety of positions with little cost to the City. The work-study program pays for 70% to 100% of the students' salary. The City is responsible for the remaining amount of salary, if any, and a 10% administrative fee charged by the University. This agreement does not obligate the City to hire any students but does provide us with the opportunity to get assistance for a minimal cost. The benefit to the student is the experience they receive as well as the salary that is paid to them from the University. This has the opportunity to help City programs while providing educational opportunities. Staff recommends the approval of this agreement. su , Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager CALIFORNIA STATE WORK-STUDY PROGRAM OFF-CAMPUS AGREEMENT FOR / NON PROFTr Agreement Covering Off-Campus Employer's Participation in the State Work-Study Program. Pursuant to and subject to the provisions of Article 18 (commencing with Section 69950), City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamon~ar CA 91730 (Name & Location of Employer) (hereinafter referred to as the "Employer") and California State University, San Bernardino, a post- secondary educational institution of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as the "Institution") in order to provide for the conduct of the State Work-Study Program as a program of student financial aid, hereby agree to the following previsions. This Agreement becomes effective on the date executed by the Institution. ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS A. The Employer A.qrees: (1) To comply with all program requirements. (2) To the extent the employer is able, to utilize the services of qualified students referred to it by the Institution who are eligible to participate in the State Work-Study Program. (3) To submit to the Institution an Employer Agreement Form, hereinafter called the "Assignment Form," which provides all of the following information: a. The total number of positions available; b. A job description of each available position, including the suggested rate of pay. c. The skills required of the prospective work-study employee; d. The educational benefits provided by the position. (4) To notify the institution within 5 working days of any change affecting the student's employment. The Institution should be notified of a student is not performing satisfactorily or if other adjustments are necessary to effect a better working relationship. (5) That following execution of the Agreement, the employer may interview prospective work-study employees. The institution shall provide the employer and each applicant for the work-study position with adequate information to facilitate a proper placement. I of 5 Io[- 1 (6) Not to discriminate between applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, or subject any applicant to any other discriminatory practices by state or federal law. (7) To ensure that each work-study position meets all of the following conditions: a. The position shall be educationally beneficial or related to a particular career interest of the exploration of career options. b. The work performed by the student shall not be related to the activities of any sectarian organization or to any partisan or nonpartisan political activities. c. The employment of a work-study student shall not displace workers currently employed by the participating employer, or impair existing contracts for services. No position filled by a work-study student shall have been occupied by a regular employee during the current or immediately preceeding 12 months. d. The work-study position shall not violate any applicable collective bargaining agreements, or fill any vacancies due to a labor dispute. e. The student shall be paid at a comparable rate to that paid for comparable positions within the employing organization. If the employing organization has no comparable position, the student shall be paid at a rate comparable to that paid by other organizations in the field for work involving comparable duties and responsibilities. The positions shall be compared on the basis of the nautre of the work performed and the background and skills required for the position, and not upon the employee's part-time or student status. In no event shall the student be paid less than the California minimum wage. f. The hours of employment shall not exceed the hours specified by the institution. The employer shall provide the institution with an accurate account- ing of hours worked and wages earned. g. The total compensation received by the student shall not exceed the total amount authorized by the Institution. h. The employer shall provide the student with reasonable supervision. I. No funds appropriated under this article shall supplant any state, federal, or institutional funds used to support existing paid positions for students in profit or nonprofit organizations. (8) For the purposes of this Agreement, the Employer furthers agrees to: a. Pay directly to employed students their total earned compensation less appropriate deductions as defined on the Assignment Form. b. Claim reimbursement only for wages: 2of5 I01 -Z_, (1) paid to students certified as eligible by the Institution; and (2) that do not represent hours of work in excess of the maximum number of hours subject to reimbursement under this Agreement; or for commission, bonuses, or other special compensation paid the student; or for wages earned or paid but not reported to the Institution by the specified deadlines. (3) for actual hours worked by the student. The State's share of work- study compensation shall not include payment for vacation time, holiday pay, sick leave, union dues, jury duty, etc. ¢. Maintain an accurate record of the hours worked by each student on a form designed by the Institution for that purpose; d. Submit to the Institution's appropriate office, on the appropriate form and within the time limited specified by the Institution, all payroll information required by the Institution; e. Submit to the Institution's appropriate office on or by end of the month, payroll information as required by the Institution for any compensation earned or paid during the month(s) of 7/02 thru 6/03, regardless of the timing of the Employer's regular payroll pedods; f. Make its payroll records for students paid under the State Work-Study Program available to institutional staff, California Student Aid Commission staff or other State of California personnel for audit purposes. g. Provide a written evaluation of the performance of each student on an annual basis or upon termination of employment. B. The Institution aqrees to: (1) Determine the employer's eligibility to participate in the program. (2) Review the work-study positions offered and determine whether they satisfy the program statutes. (3) Screen and refer only eligible students to prospective employers. (4) Notify the Employer of any student who may become ineligible within 5 working days of ineligibility. (S) Review, with the student(s), the terms of the Assignment Form. (6) Negotiate an agreement which specifies the percentage share of student compensation to be paid by the employer and by the California State Work-Study Program, respectively. 3of5 a. For work-study positions with public eduational institutions or nonprofit corpor- ations, the program shall provide no more than 70% of the student's gross compensation. b. For work-study positions with for-profit employers, the program shall provide no more than 50% of the student's gross compensation. 4or5 ARTICLE II - TERMINATION A. This Agreement shall be subject to the availability of funds granted to the Institution for this program. B. This Agreement represents the complete and full agreement between the Institution and Employer with respect to the matters stated herein. Any agreements or promises made which are not reflected in the written terms of this Agreement are and shall be superseded by the terms of this Agreement and shall have no effect on the terms of this Agreement. No amendments or modifications to this Agreement shall be valid unless they are made in writing and are signed by authorized representatives of the Institution and Employers. C. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, without notice, because of, and within sixty (60) days of, a breach of any provisions of this Agreement by the other party. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, without cause, within thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. *Unless earlier terminated as provided herein, this Agreement shall remain in effect until Csame as above). City of Rancho Cucamonga Name of Employing Business (Please ptfnt or type) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Employers Address (Please p#nt or hype) P#nted name of Employer's Representative Signature of Institutional Contracting Officer Kathy Hansen Signature of Employer's Representative Pdnted Name Director of Procurement & Support Services Title of Employer's Representative Title of InstltuEonal Contracting Officer Eml~loyeds State Tax Number Date Date 5of5 [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DA3E: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~'~' Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techr{icianC¢/~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $498,599.39 ($453,272.17 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, VANCE CORPORATION, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1446176-0 ($320,478.64) AND MELLO ROOS (FS) FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 32835165602 ($178,120.75) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $498,599.39 ($453,272.17 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Vance Corporation, for the construction of the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23r~ Street, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1446176-0 ($320,478.64 and Mello Roos (FS) Funds, Account No. 32835165602 ($178,120.75). BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on February 11, 2003, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $541,666.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. (~'=~ffully submitted,, ~. O,Nei,~'~(~ City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 11, 2003 /IpparentLow Bidder ENGINEERS Laird Construction Co., EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE Vance Corporation R.J. Noble Corn ~an~ Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT NC QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOL~T COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT I LS Cleadng and Grubbin~, includin~l removal of rocks 520,000.00 20,000.0~ $55,329.00 $55,329.0( s31,500.00 S31,500.0( $31,50000 $17,388.00 $17,388.0( 2 1980 SF Remove AC pavement indudin~ A.C. berm 51.20 2,376.0( $0.65 $1,287.0( $2.45 $4,851.0( $4,851.00 $1.50 $2,970.0( 3 Ill EA Remove Euca~ptus Tree ~00.00 44,400.0( $280.80 531,168.8( $265.00 $29,415.0( $29,4[5,00 $250.00 $27,750.0( 5 66 EA Reruove Tree Stump $75.00 4,950.0( 586.40 55,702.4( $90.00 $5,940.0( $5,940.00 5100.00 $6,600,0( 6 3 £A Remove Sland Pipe (PCC Cy~nder) 51,000.00 3,000.0( 5130.69 $392.0: 51,000.00 $2,000.0( 53,000.00 5150.00 5450.0( 7. 5990 C¥ Unclasif~d Excava~n s16.00 95.840.0( 54.62 $27.673.8{ $10.00 $59.900.0( $59,900.00 516,50 598,835.0( ~. 2HO TON Crushed Aggregate Base 5~7.00 35,870.0( $11.64 $24,560.4( $11.00 $23,210.0( $23,210.00 $11.50 $24,265.0( 9. ~00 TON AsphaltConcretePavernen! 54o,oo 72,000.0( 536.~a 565,3o4.0( 539.00 570,200.0( 570,200.00 534.75 56~,550.0( ]0. ~40 sY 0.10' Cold Plane 5s.oo 1,120.0( $3.55 $497.0( $11.00 $1,540.0( $1,540.00 $15.00 $2,100.0c 11. 3 EA Adjust Ware' Valve Box & Cover to Finbh Grade 5200.00 600.0( $33.31 $99.93 $63.00 $189.0( $189.00 $150.0( $450.0c I £^ Install Vault for Fire Doubla Detector Check Asserubl'/ 57,s00.00 7,$00.0{ $3,373.92 $3,373.92 $3,300.0c $3,300.00 $3,300.0( $14,100.00 $14,100.00 ~ Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 1 I, 2003 Alliance Streetworks, Mobassaly E.G.N. Construction, Holland-Lowe EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Inc. Engineering, Inc. Inc. Ben's .anphalt, Inc. Construction, Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT OHIT , ~O QT~ UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COSt AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS Cleadn~landGmbbi~,in~ludin~removalo~roeks $62,015.0( 62,015.0( 511,0O0.0O $11,O00.0( $12,8O0.0{ $12,8O0.00 $17,5O0.0~ $17,500.O0 ~44,555.00 $44,$55.O0 2. 198( SF Remove AC pavement including A.C. berm $2.0( 3,960.0( 52.20 $4,356,0( $1.7.~ $3,465.0o $13(] $2,574.0o $3.0(] $5,940.0o 3. Ill EA Re.ye Euca~ptus Tree $40o.0( 51,060.(E $240.00 s26,640.00 $290.0( $32,190.00 5500.0(] $55,500.0o $275.00 $30,525.00 4. EA EerP, ove C~"us TILae $200.0( L20O.0( $10o.00 $600.0( $50.0( $300.00 $230.00 $1,30o.0o $42.00 $252.00 5. 6( EA Remove Tree Stump $150.0( 9,900.0( $100.00 $6,0o0.0~ $90.0( $5,940.0o $175.0~ $11,550.00 $85.0o $5,610.00 6. EA Remove Stand Pipe (PCC C~ltnder) $7~.0( 2,250.0~ 520o.0o $0o0.0¢ s3o0.0( $90o.o0 $5o0.0(] 51,5o0.o0 $1,410.0o $4,230.o0 7 5~ CY Unelasified Excavation 510.00 $9,9~0.00 $13.50 $80,865.0(] $15.0( $89,850.0o $14.5(] $86,855.0o $16.00 $95,840.0o $ 211(] TON Crashed Aggregate Base $11.00 23,210.00 $15.0( $31,650.00 $16.0C $33,7o0.0o $11.25 $23,737.50 $13.75 $29,O12.50 9 1800 TON ~,sphalt Co0orete Pavement S33.o0 59,40o.0O $35.0( $68,40O.o0 $40.6¢ $73,O80.0O $34.0O $61,20O.0o $40.0o $72,0o0.o0 10 140 SY ~).10' Cold Plane S20,00 2,80o.00 $12.0( $1,6o0.00 $22.5(] $3,150.0o $20.00 $2,8o0.o0 $8.95 $1,253.00 II 3 EA ~,diust Water Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $6o0.0o L$o0.0o 540.0( $120.o0 $10o.00 $3o0.o0 $50.0o $150.00 $00.o0 $240.o0 12 F~A ?,onstm~ 28' CE] Inlet with lc<al depression 5s,0o0.00 8,00o.0o 57,80o.0c 57,s0o.0o $s,550.0o $a,550.0o s8,20o.0o $s,20o.0o $8,26s.0o $8,26s.o0 13. EA Jnder Sidewalk Drain $4,o00.o0 4,0o0.o0 51,~00.0c SI,6o0.o0 53,26~.0o 53,26s.o0 $2,9~0.00 S2,950.0o $2,908.0o $2,068.00 14. 1750 LF ~' PCC Curb and 24' Gutter $9.0o 15,750.O $11.2~ $19,687.50 $10.60 $18,550.0O! $9.80 $17,150.0o $9.40 516,450.00 15. 55O SF S' PCC Driveway Approaoh s5.0o 2,750.(3 $3.00 $1,650.0o $2.90 $1,595.~x $3.0o $1,650.0o $4.0o $2,200.00 25. Ls install Charter Underground Conduit (Mat. suplied b~ Char~er) $5,o0o.0o ~,o0o.0( 53,000.0o $3,000.o01 $?,90o.0o $7,900.00 S7,50o.0o $7,500.0( $2,650.0o S2,650.0( Page 2 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING FEBRUARY 11, 2003 ATEK Construction, 4-Con Engineering, EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS All American Asphalt Inc. Gentr~ Brothers, Inc. Ranco Corporation Inc. NO QTY UNIT DESCRJPTION COST AMOUI~q' COST AMOU'r~ COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT ]. ! LS Cleating and Grubbing,indudin~ removal of rocks s27,000.00 27,00o.0( s20,~0o.00 $20,000.e0 $63.~00.00 $63,0eo.e( st 5,00o.00 sls.00o.(x $69,000.00 $6~,000.0( 5. 66 £A Rernove Tree Stump $82.0o $,412.0( $250.0~ $16,50o.o0 $175.0o $i 1,550.0( stoo.oo $6,6{30.00 $80.00 $5,280.0( 6. 3 EA Remove Stand Pipe {PCC Cylinder) $1joo.0o 3,30o.0{ $1,50o.00 $4,500.00 $50.o0 $150.0( $1,0o0.0o $3,0o0.0o' $1,000.00 $3,00o.0( 18. 14( sF PCC Wh0ol Chair Ramp $4.0O $60.0( $12.0O $],680.0O] $5.00 $?O0.0( $3.00 $420.00 S$.0O $700.O0 I'). E^ RelocateFimH],'drant $3,30o.0o . 3,300.0( $3,000.00 $3,000,0( $1,$00.0o $1,50o.0( $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 22. LS Install SCE Stmet~ight Conduit and Materials $15,700,00 l ~,700.0( $6,000.00 $6,000.0( S22,00O.O0 $22,0O0.0( $20,790.0O S20,790.O0 Sl $,00O.0O $1 $,00O.0O =3. La install SCE Unde~lrOund Conduit and Matada~s S=S,(~x~.oo 25,600.0( $24,0O0.00 $24,00O.0( $53,0OO.0O $$3,O00.0( $57,939.0O $$7,939.O0 $~O,(~.00 $60,0OO.00 2s. LS InstalIChartarUnden~roundConduit(Matsupliedb~'Charter) $7,300.00 7,300.0( $6,00o.0o $6,00o.0o $27,00o.(x] $27,000.0( $51,030.00 $51,030.o0 $34,00o.0o $34,Q~0.o0 26. LS Install Ci~/Fiber Optic Conduit i~-=l, pull ropes, vaul~ and pull b $] L200.00 ! 1,200.0( s]2,000.00 $12,000.00 s22,000.0~ s22,000.00 $22,680.00 $22,680.00 $25,Q00.00 29. EA In$lell 2' Domes~c Water Sentice with Meier Box $1,225.0o 1,225.0( $ L00o.o0 $1,0oo.oo $2,00o.~ $2,0o0.0o $2,695.o0 $2,695.00 $1,2o0.0o $1,20o.0o 3o. ]~^ ,stall 6' Fire Hydrant Assem bi'/ $3,120.00 3,120.0( $5,000.00 $$,00o.0o $3,$o0.0~ $3,50o.0o $3,674.o0 $3,674.0o $4,000.00 $4,00o.0o 34. 32 u= Install 6' Schedule 40 Standard Steel Watedine $43.0o 1,376,0{ $55.{)0 $ i,?~0.0o $90.0~ $2,880.00 $39.6~ $1,267.20 $1o0.o0 $3~20o.0o 36I £A Install 6' Vahte and Box Assembi'/ s665.00 c~s.o~ $t,20o.0o $1,20o.oo $?so.o~ $75o.oo sLoso.o~ $~,050.o0 $(~0.o~ $60o.o0 37.I ~A Install Blind Flenge at PJW $110.o0 330.a $$0o.0o sLs0o.0o $20o.0( $(=0().0o $150.0~ $450.~ $4o0.o0 38. LS ;tonm Watar Potlu~n Preven~on Plan (SWPPP) st?,00o.0o 1 ?,00o.04 $5,0o0.0o $5,0o0.0o S1,$0o.0( $L$0o.0o $4,0o0.0( $4,0o0.~ $1,$0o.0~ $1,50o.(3~ 4L Ls Trak Signs, Markem and Barricade ind. removal of existi~ $2,1o0.00 2,1o0.0 sl,?o0.0o S1,700,00 $2,2o0.0( 52,2o0.o0 $2,o00,(x $2,o00.0( $4,000,0( ~4,0o0.0( 42,, EA Constm~on Noff~n Si~n SStO,0o L530.~ $70o.0o s2,10o.0o $650.0( $1,950.o0 s8o0.0( $2,40o.0( $750.0( Page 3 VICINITY MAP EAST AVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN ST, TO NORTH OF 23RD ST, PROJECT LOCATION Almond Rd -- Hillside Rc ~ Av i-- Route 30 Banyan 4and Ay Foothi EXHIBIT "A" R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A [~NGINggI~ING D E PAI~TNENT Staff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BONDS, FOR CUP 97-19, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, SUBMI'I-I'ED BY AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds, for CUP 97-19, located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by American Stores Properties, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: American Stores Properties, Inc. 6565 Knott Avenue Buena Park, CA 90620 Release: Maintenance Bends 6142067 $ 68,528.00 6142067 $ 102,000.00 e.~ectfully submitted, ,~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO RD i E ~// 8LVD N.T.$. CUP'B7619 R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A ENGINEERING DE PARTIqENT DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR Tract 14509, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY ICSWH HERMOSA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14509, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by ICSWH Hermosa, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in n3aterials and workmanship. Developer: ICSWH Hermosa, LLC A California Limited Liability Company 7161 Indiana Avenue Riverside, CA 92404 Release: Maintenance Bond 3DO0078653 $41,470.00 olY submitted, * City Engineer WJO;LRB:Is Attachments A HILLSIDE RAN~rA. N NI(IHLANO :TORIA UPLAND -' BABELINE FONTINA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA 4lb ONTARIO R ^ C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGIN El~t~lff G DE DAI~T~IEN T Staff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Project Manager ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician -~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING AND PCC CURB ALONG SUMMIT TRAIL AT SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ALONG HILLSIDE TRAIL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD WEST OF BERYL, CONTRACT NO. 02-058 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $36,218.25 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the construction of the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb Along Summit Trail at south side of Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road west of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02-058, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $31,810.50 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $36,218.25. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $36,218.25, which included one contract change order resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 13.86%. The original amount approved by Council was $34,991.55 ($31,810.50 plus 10%). Re~-=~ully submitted, · WillJacd J. O'Neil City Engineer /// RESOLUTION NO. 4;:~"~¢/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING AND PCC CURB ALONG SUMMIT TRAIL AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ALONG HILLSIDE TRAIL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD WEST OF BERYL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 02-058 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb along the south side of Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road west of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02- 058, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted .and the City Engineer is authorized to sign.and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. //2- HILLSIDE& SUMMIT COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING North & South Side of Hillside Road West of BerYl Street S°uth Side of Summit Avenue East ~. Eflwande Avenue SITE MAP . PROJECT ~ SITF.~ Wilson Ave Banyan Street Summit Ave : Fit210 l~thstmet i _j -lighland Avenue Base Line Road Boulevard Foothill R a N C h O C U C a M O N G A Staff Report DALE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM.' William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Project Manager ~i~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19Tx STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 02-068 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $197,301.26 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Amhibald Avenue and 19t~ Street, Southwest Corner, Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-068, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $191,750.93 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $19,730.13, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $197,301.26. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $197,301.26, which included four contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 2.89%. The original amount approved by Council was $210,926.49 ($191,751.35 plus 10%). Re~p~.,ct[ully submitted, City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 02- 068 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Southwest Comer, Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-068, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. //._5 ]l~LsoN ~w II ~.~T~ ST GTH 5T ~TH ~T P ROJ E CT ONTARIO C'~ LIMIT LOCATION ~.~: ~.~.~ ~ ~o~ t,~ s~. ~o 100' 8/0 ~0~, ~ 1~ ~. ~0~ ~C~.n l~. TO 150' W/O ~.US~ TH CITY OF I~AN C Il 0 C UCAM O N GA Staff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor SURIECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES RECOMMENDATION The construction of park trash enclosures has been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said project improvement and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $68,700.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, the bids for the construction of park trash enclosures project were received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, Tobin Construction. The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Construction of Park Trash Enclosures by: CONTRACTOR: Robert Tobin dba Tobin Construction 5823 Zapata Place Alta Loma, CA 91737 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape) $68,700.00 Respectfully submitted, Willi~am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JB:dlw Attachment //7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PARK TRASH ENCLOSURES AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for construction of Park Trash Enclosures have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. TH E C ~ T Y OF I~ANCHO CUCAI~ONGA DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-17 - GOUGH - An appeal of the Planning Commission approval of a request to construct a 2,945 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru carwash, and pump island on 1-acre of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2), of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-211-12, and 13. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. BACKGROUND: The City Council continued the public hearing on this item from the March 5, 2003 hearing to provide time for staff and the City's environmental consultant to review and respond to a set of four letters provided by the appellant (Mr. Paul Gough on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Flores - owners and operators of the Mobil service station at Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard) at the March 5th hearing. Staff is requesting a two-week continuance to provide additional time to complete the analysis and response to comments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council continue the public hearing on the appeal of Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-17 and associated revised Mitigated Negative Declaration to April 2, 2003. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing for the March 5, 2003 City Council meeting in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Furthermore, additional notices were sent to new residences to the west of the site beyond the 300-foot radius. On March 5, 2003, the City Council continued the public hearing on this item to March 19, 2003. Should the City Council continue the item to the April 2, 2003 meeting, no further public notice is necessary, as the continuance would be granted in a public forum. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC\Is TH E CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAFIONGA Sti ffR rt DATE: Mamh 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002 00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the Development District zoning designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for 120 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA2001-00001, DDA2002-00001, AND DCA2002-00001- FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 2 the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-000011, and Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001, and issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. ANALYSIS: Approval of these requests will establish a Mixed Use land designation for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), or Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overly District (SHOD), for the property at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel. The applications were initiated originally by the Frazier Group to provide the appropriate land use designation needed by the applicant to develop a senior housing project that would include a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). However, the applicant has since modified their original request and is now asking for a Land Use Amendment strictly as a Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) residential density with no SHOD. The applicant's intention is to now develop a "for sale" townhouse project on the site and not market to seniors only. Staff indicated to the applicant that without a SHOD, the Planning Division would only support a land use change to allow a Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) density. The Planning Commission agreed with staff by recommending approval of a Mixed Use land designation for Office and a Medium Residential density, or Office and a Medium-High Residential density only if a project is developed in conjunction with a SHOD. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Report of January 22 and February 12, 2003, regarding analysis of the proposed applications. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An Initial Study was completed that determined a project designed and developed under a Mixed Use category outlined above could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site grading. The report also identified the potential for long-term traffic noise impacts by exposing residents to traffic noise. The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and the attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impacts to less than significant. Further environmental issues will need to be analyzed when a formal development proposal is submitted in the future for the site. When a specific development project is proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. The applicant will be required to provide appropriate reports/studies to address such concerns. Any significant impacts identified will be mitigated through the City's Development Review process. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA2001-00001, DDA2002-00001, AND DCA2002-00001- FRAZIER GROUP Mamh 19, 2003 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: On March 3, 2003, staff received a letter dated February 25, 2003, from the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) indicating that they did not receive enough information in the Notice of Intent to Adopt Negative Declaration to determine the extent of the potential impact to State transportation facilities. Staff sent a response letter indicating that the 20-day response period had ended; however, staff would forward their concern to the City Council, prior to final approval. More importantly, staff also explained that at this time the applications were for a Land Use Amendment only with no formal project proposed at this time. The 162 multi-family residential units referred to in the Initial Study Part II are based on the potential for a project if developed under a Medium-High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation for a Medium density without the SHOD, the maximum units that could be developed on the site, if approved, would be approximately 101. A new Initial Study will be required in conjunction with a submittal of any formal development application on the site. Caltrans and any other affected agencies will receive the environmental information for their comment prior to any development taking place on the site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:WM:mlg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Reports dated January 22 and February 12, 2003 Draft Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001 Ordinance Adopting Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001 Ordinance Adopting Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 THE CITY OF I~^~ ~:n o Cuc^~o~^ $ Rer,ort DATE: February 12, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00001 - FRAZlER GROUP - A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002 00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the Development District zoning designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow 'for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207- 101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-000011, and Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP February 12,2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The item was continued from January 22, 2003, because of an error in the written description of the location in the legal advertised notification and within the environmental documents. A corrected initial study has been circulated and the project has been re-advertised and re-posted with the correct information. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site to properties to the east, west, and south and up to Red Hill Country Club Drive to the north. A total of 174 notices were mailed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 for a Mixed Use zoning designation to include a 0-100 pement Medium Residential density and 0-100 percent Office designation through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:WM/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - January 22, 2003, Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit "B" - Revised Initial Study dated January 20, 2003 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of GPA DRC2002-00001 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of DDA DRC2002-00001 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of DCA DRC2002-00001 THE CITY OF l~^N CIl O CIJ CAH O N GA st Report DATE: January 22, 2003 TO: Chairman and Membe~ of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buffer, Ci~ Planner BY: Waffen Morelion, Assis~nt Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENE~L P~N AMENDMENT GP~002-00001 - F~IER GROUP - A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from O~ to Mixed Use to allow for O~ce and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land Io~ted on the noah side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cu~monga Channel. The Ci~ will also ~nsider Mixed Use to allow for O~ce and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Appli~tion Review DRC2002-00450, Prelimina~ Review DRC2002-00589, Development District Amendment DDt002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DC~002 00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDt002-00001 - F~IER GROUP - A request to change the Development District zoning designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts from O~ to Mixed Use to allow for O~ and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land lo.ted on the nodh side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cu~monga Channel. The Ci~ will also consider Mixed Use to allow for O~ and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207- 101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Appli~tion Review DRC2002-00450, Prelimina~ Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GP~002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DC~002-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DC~002-00001 - F~IER GROUP - A r~quest to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code to allow for Offi~ and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land Io~ted on the nodh side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cu~monga Channel. The Ci~ will also consider Mixed Use to allow for O~ce and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50. Related Files: Pre-Appli~tion Review DRC2002-00450, Prelimina~ Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GP~002-000011, and Development District Amendment DDt002-00001. Exhibit "A" / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP January 22,2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The project was originally submitted on June 12, 2002, as a Pre-Application Review for 200 market rate senior apartments. On July 29, 2002, the applicant submitted a Preliminary Review based on recommendations of the Planning Commission. Because of the 30 dwelling units per acre requested by the applicant, staff recommended the site be developed with a Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) residential density in conjunction with a senior housing overlay that could allow for a 25 percent density increase. Staff indicated to the applicant that without a senior overlay, the ' Planning Division would only support a land use change to allow a Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) density. The applicant agreed with staff's recommendation. The land use amendment was initiated in the form of a General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, Development Code Amendment, and Development Agreement (SHOD). As a result of the request for Senior Housing Overly District, a City Council Housing Subcommittee meeting was held to discuss the project on October 22, 2002. Based on the Subcommittee's discussion, the applicant has requested to change the original request and process the land use amendment strictly as a Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) residential density with no SHOD. The applicant's intention is to now develop a "for sale" townhouse project on the site and not market to seniors only. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: The application is a request to change the General Plan land use and Development District designations to a Mixed Use category that would permit the development of the subject site as Office and/or Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and/or Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site. The site is presently designated as all Office. The change in land use would essentially provide for a 100 percent residential density bonus to the site. Under a Medium-High Residential component (100 percent of the site) up to 162 units may be permitted. Under a Medium Residential component (100 percent of the site) up to 95 units may be permitted. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Pacific Electric Inland Empire TrailNacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Homes/Trailer Park, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East Vineyard Town Center, Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District) West Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Office North Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East General Commercial West Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes southerly at an average of approximately 4-5 percent; however, the slope on the northeast portion of the site exceeds 25 percent. The site is triangular in shape with several scattered mature trees and a Eucalyptus windrow at the southwest end. A billboard exists on the west end of the site facing Foothill Boulevard eastbound traffic. The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard. The structures have been deemed non-historic. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP January 22,2003 Page 3 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting to change the 7.24-acre site (6.74 acres net) from an Office designation to a Mixed Use designation. The Mixed Use designation is drafted to permit 0-100 percent Office and 0-100 percent Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), or the City will also consider 0-100 percent Office and 0-100 percent Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). As previously indicated, the maximum residential unit count for the site would be 162 or 85 depending on the residential land use classification. The current Office land use designation does not permit residential development on the site. B. Appropriateness of ExistinR Land Use: The site is currently designated as an Office District, which is complementary with existing land uses along Foothill Boulevard. As defined, "the Office District is intended to accommodate professional/administrative office and personal services as opposed to commercial orientated land uses. Typically, uses consist of executive, management, administrative, or cledcal uses including the establishment of branch offices, data processing centers, and the provision of consultation establishments of a professional nature." Currently, the nearest other designated Office Districts along Foothill Boulevard are at the northeast and southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue (approximately :4 miles to the west), and on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Vineyard Avenue and Hellman Avenue (approximately .1 mile to the east). C. Appropriateness of Proposed Land Use: The division of the proposed Mixed Use District is 0-100 percent Office and 0-100 percent Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). From a non-residential standpoint, the potential for the site to be developed 100 percent Office would mean no change in land use or project density. As previously mentioned, the current Office District does not allow residential development, and therefore, the potential for the site to be developed with 100 percent multiple-family residential would allow for a 100 percent residential density bonus (units per acre). The City's General Plan shows the following Land Use Plan Statistical Summary for residential designations (Page 111-19): Current Projected Residential Summary Dwelling units (upper range) % Residential Single-Family Residential / Hillside 254 Very Low (less than 2 du/ac) 7,958 Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) 16,592 Low-Medium (4-8 du/ac) 16,336 Total 41,140 66% Multi-Family Residential Medium (8-14 du/ac) 10,304 Medium-High (14-24 du/ac) 9,024 High (24-30 du/ac) 1,650 Total 20,978 34% Total Residential 62,118 Mixed Use 5,134 Grand Total 67,252 /Z7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP January 22,2003 Page 4 In the 1990s, the City Council adopted a policy to keep a 65 percent single-family and 35 percent multi-family mix of residential development in the City. Though the proposed increase in multi- family housing would not greatly affect the overall mix of residential development, the effect would be reduced with a maximum of 85 units as permitted under a Medium density, rather than 162 units permitted under a Medium-High density. Staff also believes the change in land use from Office to Mixed Use with the potential for Medium-High residential would not be considered similar in terms of land use intensity as Office on the site, nor would it be consistent with residential zoning in the area, which includes Medium density to the south and northeast, and Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the north and west. Staff has indicated to the applicant that the Planning Division would only support a senior apartment project with Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) density, as originally submitted and discussed below, provided the project be developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Oveday District (SHOD). The site satisfies the location requirements of the SHOD by having various services and amenities such as food, shopping, gym, and public transit within walking distance. The site could also be designed to reduce aqy land use compatibility concerns. The potential mix of multiple-family and office uses on the same site may create inherent design difficulties when trying to provide compatible land use relationships. The requirement for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to be submitted in conjunction with any commercial development will provide the avenue to ensure that the appropriate design criteria is used in the approved project plan. If developed at 100 percent multi-family residential, the on-site compatibility concerns would be significantly reduced. D. Alternatives: The alternatives listed for review are the two sets of different land uses that include Medium-High Residential and Office, or Medium Residential and Office being considered in the Mixed Use scenario, and the percent of development of each on the site. If the site is constructed as strictly Medium-High Residential or Medium Residential, the site could be developed as a multi-family housing project as outlined in Item "A" above. The site may also be constructed totally as Office that would be consistent with the site's existing land use. Based on the site's location, staff would recommended a Mixed Use zoning designation to include a 0-100 percent Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) density and 0-100 percent Office. E. Neighborhood Meetin.q: On October 17, 2002, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the proposed project. Five residents from the residential development to the north attended the meeting. The residents were mainly concerned with the grade changes of the project as it relates to their homes to the north. The residents stated they were concerned with protecting their views. The residents were also concerned with noise because of the potential for outdoor activities. One resident thought that the 500-foot boundary in which notices were mailed to'residents should be extended to the north to at least Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant explained in detail the size and scope of the project and indicated that the height of the buildings should not affect the residents' views to the south. The applicant also explained the expected outdoor actives associated with the project, and agreed to work with staff to extend the boundary for future notices mailed to residents beyond 500 feet in the future. The residents were in support of the project as proposed; however, they did not want to see a land use amendment get approved and 200 non-senior apartments get built. The applicant explained that they intended on doing the project as a senior apartment community and that City staff would condition the project so that the only way to get the density bonus to allow 200 units was through a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP Janua~ 22,2003 Page 5 Since the neighborhood meeting was held, the applicant has requested the land use amendment be processed for Medium-High residential density only, with no SHOD or product at this time. Staff would recommend the applicant conduct another neighborhood meeting during the actual project development stage of the site. F. Housinq Subcommittee: On October 22, 2002, the Housing Subcommittee (Paul Biane, William Alexander) met to discuss the project when it included a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). There is no SHOD proposed at this time; however, a synopsis of the meeting has been included for your reference. The City Planner, Brad Buller, introduced the project and explained to the Subcommittee that because of the type of development proposed, staff had recommended the applicant do a land use amendment that would change the current Office zoning of the site to a Mixed Use that would include a SHOD. Mr. Buller explained that under a SHOD, the project would have to meet certain requirements, such as a close proximity to commercial development, public transit, and recreational facilities. This project meets those requirements. Mr. Buller then explained that for this particular project, the applicant is asking that the City offer the following development incentives: · Up to 30 dwelling units per acre · Parking ratio of 1 parking space per unit · Financial assistance of $1.7 million · Relief from building height requirements · Relief from Hillside Development standards to allow 15-foot high retaining walls · Reduction in studio unit sizes from 550 square feet to 440 square feet · Reduction in private open space from 150 square feet for ground floors and 100 square feet for upper floors, to 60 square feet for ground and upper floors for studio and one-bedroom units, and 70 square feet for ground and upper floors for two-bedroom units. The Committee discussed the project and incentives requested. The Committee was mainly concerned with the design of the project as it relates to the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail and residential development to the north. The applicant/architect explained to the Committee that there would be access to the trail at the rear of the site. The applicant also explained in detail the overall design of the proposed buildings, and how they would not affect the views of the residents to the north, except for maybe the tower elements that are higher than the main building. In addition, the applicant explained that the project would have a 360-degree architectural theme, though the north side would not be as elaborate as the south and east sides facing Foothill Boulevard. The Committee was also concerned with the reduction in private open space proposed. The Committee felt that that square footages proposed were just too Iow for private open space, especially for seniors. In addition, the Committee felt that the $1.7 million in financial assistance requested was a concern; however, was prepared to discuss the issue at another time. In all, the Committee was in support of the project and thought the project would be a good fit for the site. However, the Committee felt that the questions in the reduction of private open space and financial incentives would still have to be addressed in the future. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP January 22, 2003 Page 6 G. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and Part II of the Initial Study have been completed and determined that a project designed and developed under a Mixed Use category outlined above could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site grading and drainage during site construction. The report also identified the potential for long-term traffic noise impacts. The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and the attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impact to less than significant. Further environmental issues will need to be analyzed when a formal development proposal is submitted in the future for the site. When a specific development project is proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. The applicant will be required to provide appropriate reports/studies to address such concerns. Any significant impacts identified will be mitigated through the City's Development Review process. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Because of an error in the description at the time this project was advertised and environmental documents were processed, staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue these items to February 12, 2003. A new initial study has been circulated and the project will be re-advertised for the February 12, 2003, Planning Commission meeting. In addition, corrected public hearing notices will be mailed and the property will be re-posted. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:WM/jc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit "B" - Development District Map Exhibit "C" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2002-00001 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2002-00001 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00001 General Plan Land Use Map 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet N ~ I (~' Development District Map Project Site I-oothill Boulevard A .~. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet ~, I N ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ~-..~-~ (Part I - Initial Study) (~o~) ~-~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that if is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the applicaUon is complete at the b'me of submittal; C~ afaff will not be evaitebte to perform work required to pmv/de mi~,lng information, Application Number for the p~ojeot to which this form Exhibit "C" Name & Address of person preparing this form (if diftemnt from above): Telephone Infmmation indicated by este#~k 0 is not required of non-consbucri~ CUP ~ unless o~herwise requested by staff. °1) Provide a full ~...ale (8-f/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quad~aot sheet(s) which includes the projeot eEe, and incllea~ the site boundaK~s. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views ~ the site ~om the north, south, east and we~. features ~ the e~. thelu~e a map enowfng ~.~u.u. ~., ~. .-~.--,- ' W cuc, ' 4) AsSeasor--s Parcel Numbers (aEach add.'one! sheet if *$) Net Site Aree (te~al s/Je a~ze min~ area of public ~Yeets & p~opoeed ded/cafiona): ........ ~--"~t or zone cher~ge which would effec~ the prOjes~ s~te (effeeh addif~nal sheet ?) Desc#be any p~opsse~ gene_.~ p?£ ~.__,~,,~,.,?~_, . ,..~.~ ~' z~._ Page 8)Include a desc~fp#on of all permi~ which vvfll be necessary from the City of Rancho C, ucarnoncJa and other govemmen~bl agenc, Jes in order to fully implement the pmje~: / . _ 9)DesCribe the physical setlfng of the site as it exiSt~ before the proj'ect including infommg~n on topography, s~il ~abi#'ty, plants and animals, matom bees, trails and roads, drainage courseS, and sceni~ aspens. Desclfbe any exis~ng ~ructures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the stnlc~m*. Attach photoomphs of signet, ant features desctfbed. In eddP~Jon, see all ~ou~ces of inferma#on (i.e., geo/og/cal and/or hydmk~., ic studies, biotic and amheological, surveys, traffic, stoaies): O) Desc~be the known cultural and/or historfcal aspects of the site. $ife all sources of infurmatien (beO~, published ~epotts and 1) De=ctfbe any Poise sources and their levels ~at now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) end how they va*Il affect proposed useS: ueE, o~. _,~ ~-A~.~'~ ~.~-~o~o-~ ~AT~-,~A't-4' .. ~ (,~'T,'~.- o I~IU 12~Oe~bethep~Po~ed~r~ec~de~. Tfli~flou~provideanadequm'e~p~onofthe~toinlen~sofu~u~ will re~lt from ~he ~ropo~ pmje~, Indicate if there em propose~ phases for development, the extent of ~evelo~mer~ to ooeur ~ se¢fl pfle~e, and the en~idpaled completion el eaoh In~rwment. A~cfl edcli#onal sheet(a) If ne~sse~y: 13)Descrit~e the su~rouncllng pmperlfes, in;luding intcflnalfon on ple,~ end animela and any cu/tura/, r~eronoa~, or =~,~- aspects. IncEoela the type of land use (residential, commercial~ etc.), intensEY of land uae (one-family. aparlment houseS, shops, deparimen! stores, etc.) and ~cale of developmer~ (height, flontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): 14) W'#I the proposed project change the pa~tem, scale or character of the aurrounding general area of the proje~t~?? 18) Indicate expected amount of water ussge. (~ee ~t A for usage eat/mates). F~r fu~he r cla,;~; ~n, please contact b~e Cuoemang~ County W~t~r Di~lr~:t ,,t g.e. 7~,;.~f . ~D ~/I~ ~', L I, ~ ~ ~ (~y) _ I ~SIDE~AL PR~EC~: ~) Num~ ~ ~n~ ~' ~ .... ~.,,D[ n M~md~',~'~nJAI u=rlRM.eAC. OUNTERUNrTST'D1.WPD 3/00 Page Attached (indicate whether units em rental or for sale un~): 21)An~dpa~ mn~ of se~ p~s en~or mn~: 22) Sped~ number of ~m~ by un~ ~: 23) Indicate anUcipatad houMhold size by unit __ 24)Indicate Ifle expected number of ~chool child~ who will be residing w~in the project: Contact the appropriate School Distitcts es ahown in Attachment B: a. Elementary:_ b. JunlorHigh: c. SeniorHigh_ f ... COMMERClAL~ INDUSTRIAL .AND INSTITUTIONAL pROJECI'S 25) Descdbe type of use(s) and major function(s) of OommercJal, indu~lfal or in~.Ut~Jonal 20) Total floor ama of commem, ial, indusbfal, or in$#f~dfonel uses by type: ~ Page 6 ~.u=,~ ANN~NG~FiNAL~ORM~COUNTERIINIT~ t D1,WPD 3/00 27) indicate hourg of operelfon: 28) Number of Total: employees: Maximum Shift: -- 7iree of Maxireum Shift: 29) Ptotgde breekdovm of ar~Jdpated job clsssificaUons, including wage end salalx renge~, e~ well as an indicaUon of the rote of hire for each classifica~on (e~fach addiUonal sheet if nece~.~ary): 30) Esttreation of the number of worke~ to he hired that currency re~ide in the *31)For ~.~rnmerctal end indu~#al uses only, indicate the source, b/pe and amount of air pollution eml~siot~, (Data should be w~fled through the South Coaat Air Quality Management Dis~, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, ~wer, fire, and flood ~ agencies sewing the project been contaded to determine their abihly to pmvlde adequate service to ~he propo~ed project? If ~o, please indiceta their maponse. i.~.=1 ~,IdldlN~FINA| ~FORM$~COUNTER~INITSTD1.WPD 3/00 Page 7 33) Examples of boz e~lous and/or toxic materials include, but am not lima!ed to I~.;~..s; reo~oacrr~ sues~ances, ~. ~, herbicicles; fuels, oils, solvents, and oiher #ammeble liquids and gases. Also note underglound storage of any of the above. Please li~ the mate~fals and dascn'be their use, storage, and/or discharge on the propertY, es wel/ es the dates Of use, ff known. - 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporaO/ or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardoua and/or materials, including but no~ limlted to those examples listed above? If yea, prow'de en inventory of all such mate#als to be used and pn~oosed method of dispo.~al. The lacation of such usea, ator~cj with ~he storage end shipment ames, ~hall he shown and labeled on th$ application plans. I hereby carboy that the statements furnished above and m the attached exhtbila present the data and ~rrlarme#on required for admTuale evaluation of this preJect to the best of my abii'tb/, that the fac. ts, statorsente, and in~ormaE~on presented are bus end cormCf tot he beet of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that edditiona7 infonnaEon may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cusemollge. Trae: ..,,-.. ^~,~..~,~...~=~Ja.J t,~C~RM.~.OUNTER&INITS'FD1 ,WPD 3/00 Page ATTACHMENT A Water usage Average use per =lay Residential · Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commemial/indu~trlal General Commercial 2000 gal/day/a= Neighbon~ood Commercial 100-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9186 Page i:~PLANNiNG~iNAL~FORM~COUNTEFAINrrSTDI.WPD 3/00 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F RanchoCucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue RanchoCucamonga. CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonge, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Cheft~y High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 i:~LANNING'~FINAL~FORMS'~COUNTEF~JNITSTD1,WPD 3/00 Page 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II h\PLANNING\WARREN\GPA2002-00001_IS-revised.doc BACKGROUND 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001; Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001; Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 2. Related Files: DRC2002-00579 and DRC2002-00450 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea I of the Foothill Boulevard Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33, 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, Development District Amendment DDA2002- 00001, Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDA2002-00001-FRAZIER GROUP - A request to change the Development District zoning designation within Subarea I of the Foothill Boulevard Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site- APN: 207-101-32, 33, 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002-00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP - A request to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code to allow for Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 7.24 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. The City will also consider Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative for the entire site - APN: 207-101-32, 33, 50. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00450, Preliminary Review DRC2002- 00589, General Plan Amendment GPA2002-000011, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Michael Frazier Frazier Group Amhitects 1130 Columbia Street Brea, CA 92821 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 2 5. General Plan Designation: Office 6. Zoning: Office, Subarea 1, Foothill Boulevard Districts 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is vacant and contains mature trees. Surrounding land uses include Foothill Boulevard and single-family homes to the south; Cucamonga Creek flood control channel and Thomas Winery commercial center to the east; vacant land to thewest; and the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ('") ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services Land Use and Planning ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (,Q Population and Housing ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (,Q Aesthetics (,Q Geological Problems (v) Hazards (,') Noise ( ) Recreation 151 Water (,,') Cultural Resources Air Quality ( ) Mandato~ Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared: (,,')I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: ~7~_~_~_F~;~ ~ Warren Morelion (~ Associate Planner January 20, 2003 Iq5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (,") ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) (,/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the (v') (). vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) (,") established community? Comments: a-d) The site is presently designated Office within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The current application includes a request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). The proposed land use change is different from what was originally intended. The north side of Foothill Boulevard is currently planned for a mix of commemial and office. The proposed Mixed Use designation to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential development will have a similar intensity of land use as the currently zoned Office use; however, the proposed land use change will not be compatible with surrounding uses that include single family residential. The proposed Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) density is potentially three times more intense than the 4-8 dwelling units per acre density of the existing single family residential neighborhoods to the north and south. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposah a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) population projections? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ) ( ) ( ) (v') directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ) ( ) ( ) housing? Comments: a-b) The proposed land use change would result in new residents at the site. Based on maximum development allowed under Medium-High Residential (24 dwelling units per acre) a total of 162 apartment/condo units may be developed on-site. An increase in population of 470 people (2.9 persons per dwelling units) could be generated by the proposed land use change. The proposed land use is different from what was originally intended on-site. Since the surrounding area is developed (with the exception of the area to the immediate west) or proposed for development (Pacific Electric Trail is planned to be constructed to the immediate north), the project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. c) The proposed project includes a General Plan land use designation change from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium-High Residential. There are no residential structures on-site. The impact is not considered significant. sign~r, cant Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 3. GEOLOGICPROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (,,") ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (',") ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) (,") ( ) Iq7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 6 Comments: a-c/i)According to Exhibit V-1 of the City's General Plan, the site occurs within the Proposed Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault. Prior to development of the site under either the existing land use designation of Office or the proposed land use designation of Medium-High Residential, the applicant would be required to provide appropriate reports/studies to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d) The project site is not located near a body of water. The Cucamonga Creek Channel borders the site on the east and contains water intermittently, generally during heavy storms, and would not pose a seiche hazard to the site. e-f) Approximately five acres of the site slopes at approximately four pement from north to south, and approximately one acre contains some slopes greater than ten percent and is at an approximately 15 feet higher elevation than the contiguous five acres. No standing or ponding water was observed during a recent visit to the site. A grading plan will be required prior to site development as well as the design of proper drainage and building pad areas. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is the Ramona series. The Ramona series consists of well-drained, gently sloping to moderately steep soils that formed on fans and terraces in granitic alluvium. This series is found in slopes ranging from 2 to 30 percent and is found in elevations ranging from 1,000 to 3,000 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer is brown sandy loam and fine sandy loam about 23 inches thick. These soils are moderately slowly permeable. Prior to issuance of building permits, a soil report would be required by the Building and Safety Division. The impact is considered less than significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of water movements? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) (v') through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) (,,') h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (v') ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) (v') groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Office or under the proposed designation of Mixed Use would result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns. Approximately five acres of the site slopes gently from north to south at an approximate four pement gradient, and approximately one acre of the site contains slopes greater than ten percent. The City Engineer must approve a drainage study, indicating how storm water will be directed to the existing storm drains in the immediate area, prior to issuance of grading permits. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)..Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of five acres or more. The General Construction permit requires recipients to reduce or eliminate non-storm water discharges into storm water systems, and to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Aha Region has issued an area-wide NPDES Storm Water Permit for the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and the incorporated cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region. The City of Rancho Cucamonga then requires implementation of measures for a project to comply with the area-wide permit requirements. The SWPPP will include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction of the project to pollute surface waters. This is a standard condition of approval applicable to this project. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion are less than significant: Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 8 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the grading plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards to show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and post-construction. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will result in a less than significant impact. b) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Office or the proposed land use designation of Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential would not expose people to flood related hazards as the site is outside of the 100-year flood plain. c-e) The project site is located near the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel which borders the site on the east, and contains water intermittently generally during heavy storms. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit. f-i) Development of the site would not involve deep trenches or excavation and therefore would have no impact on the direction or course of groundwater. The project would not come in contact with groundwater Or impact ground water quality. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Impact Less 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (,/) ( ) ( ) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( (v') Comments: a) The change in land use from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential was evaluated using the Urban Emission Model 2001 (URBEMIS 2001) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. The criteda pollutants screened for /5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 9 included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PMm). Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Construction Emissions Though not required, construction emissions were screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures. The proposed area was screened under its existing land use (Office) as shown on Table lA, and then screened under its worse-case maximum proposed land use (Medium-High Residential) as shown in Table lB. Based on a net lot site of 6.74 acres, under the existing land use designation, the site could be developed with a maximum of 73,400 square-foot of office building, and under the proposed land use designation, the site could be developed with a maximum of 162 apartment/condominium units. Table lA- Site Developed Per Proposed Medium-High Residential URBEMIS 2001 Construction Emissions Summary Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~0 Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Demolition 6.72 6.72 Grading 2.98 2.83 41.48 39.41 24.10 6.72 Worker Trips 0.48 0.48 0.68 0.68 1.28 1.28 0.13 0.13 Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02 Mobile Equip. 0.80 0.76 6.88 6.54 0.53 0.50 Arch, Coatings 60,65 57.62 Asphalt 0.29 0.27 Totals 65.54 62.30 49,31 46,90 1.28 1.28 31,50 17,16 SCAQMD Thins. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Table lB - Site Developed Under Existing Office Designation URBEMIS 2001 Construction Emissions Summary Pounds per Day) Source ROG N~)x CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Demolition 6.72 6.72 Grading 3.11 2.96 43.22 41.06 24.20 9.89 Worker Trips 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.27 0.52 0.52 0.05 0.05 Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02 Mobile Equip. 0.80 0.76 6.88 6.54 0.53 0.50 Amh. Coatings 38.43 36.51 Asphalt 0.34 0.32 Totals 43.21 41.07 50.65 48.15 0.52 0.52 31.52 17.18 SCAQMD Thres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No /5/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 10 Generally, construction on a site of this size would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM~o and NOx during grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for NOx under developed conditions (post-construction impacts). Under the proposed and existing land use designations, the default fleet mix was modified to increase passenger vehicles (i.e. automobiles, small trucks, and sport utility vehicles), and decrease diesel trucks and buses. For the proposed land use, default values for painting activities were adjusted to represent an apartment/condo complex, with units to include an exterior front and rear face but with shared side exterior surfaces. Tables lA and lB show project impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During grading activities for the site, fugitive dust (PM~0) would be generated. Since, there are residential units within the vicinity of the site, and since the region is in non-attainment for PM~o, fugitive dust would be mitigated by the following measures: 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4.Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. b) During construction of either an office building or apartment/condo units, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces would increase NOx and PM~0 levels in the area. The nearest sensitive receptors are located south of the site across Foothill Boulevard. There are not schools in the vicinity of the site. The following mitigation measures would ensure impacts to sensitive receptors are less than significant. 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 11 include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in Tables 2A and 2B, post-construction activities (operations phase) would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. If the site were developed under the proposed land use designation of Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential, there would be an associated trip rate of 6.05 trips per day per dwelling unit. Based on a maximum of 162 apartment/condo units, a total of 980 trips per day would be associated with the site. Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Office would have an associated trip rate of 14.26 trips per 1,000 square feet of office building. At this trip rate, an office building of approximately 73,400 square feet would generate approximately 1,047 trips per day. Emissions associated with the proposed land use and the existing Office land use would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for criteria pollutants. Development of the site with 162 apartment/condo units would produce an additional 7.71 pounds of CO per day and an additional 6.49 pounds of ROGs per day. The additional ROGs and CO emissions would still be below SCAQMD thresholds and therefore less than significant. Table 2A - Site Developed Per Proposed Medium-High Residential Post Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Area Soume 5.63 5.63 1.22 1.13 0.52 0.48 0.00 0.00 Mobile Soume 15.13 13.70 16.11 14.58 163.51 148.01 7.19 6.51 , Totals 20.76 19.33 17.33 15.71 164.03 148.49 7.19 6.51 SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Table 2B - Site Developed Under Existing Office Designation Post Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG N0x CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Area Source 0.04 0.04 0.49 0.49 0.20 0.19 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 14.31 12.80 16.81 15.03 157.26 140.59 7.58 6.77 Totals 14.35 12.84 17.30 15.52 157.46 140.78 7.58 6.77 SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No c/d) Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Office or under the proposed designation of Mixed Use would not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 12 Issues'and Supporting Information Sources: Sigrtif~:ant 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (v') ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) (,,') sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) (,,") nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) (,/) ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (v') f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) (v') alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) If the site were developed under the proposed land use designation of Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High R.esidential, there would be an associated trip rate of 6.05 trips per day per dwelling unit. Based on a maximum of 162 apartment/condo units, a total of 980 trips per day would be associated with the site. Development of the site under the existing land use designation of Office would have an associated trip rate of 14.26 trips per 1,000 square feet of office building. At this trip rate, an office building of approximately 73,400 square feet would generate approximately 1,047 trips per day. Therefore development of the site under the proposed land use change would result in a reduced amount of vehicle trips. The impact is less than significant. Conditions of approval prepared by the Engineering Division would adequately address the street improvements necessary to accommodate project traffic. In addition, the applicant would be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the project's frontage along Foothill Boulevard. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. b/c) Site plans would be required at the time of plan submittal and would be evaluated based on requirements of the City's Development Code for safety hazards and design features. The on-site circulation system would be required to meet all current Fire Department standards for emergency access. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 13 d) At the time of plan submittal, the applicant would be required to provide a site plan depicting the location and number of parking spaces. Under the existing land use designation of Office, a total of 294 spaces would be required for a 73,400 square- foot office building (one space per 250 square feet of building). Under the proposed land use designation of Mixed Use, which would allow for Medium-High Residential, a total of 286 spaces of which 216 spaces must be either a garage or carport, would be required for 162 apartment/condo units. (Calculations are based on 54 units having one bedroom, 54 units having two bedrooms, and 54 units having three bedrooms.) Based on the above calculations, the proposed change in land use designation would require eight parking spaces less than the existing Qffice designation plus, at a minimum carport structures. This would not be considered a significant impact. e/f) The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard immediately west of Cucamonga Channel. According to Exhibit 111-7 of the City General Plan, a Class II Bike Lane is planned on Foothill Boulevard. Class II bike lanes are located next to the curb or edge of paved roadways and are a minimum of five feet in width. The cyclist shares the road shoulder with vehicles in a Class II Bike route, which includes signage, special lane lines and other pavement markings. In addition, a Class I Bike Path is planned along the abandoned railroad corridor to the north. Class I Bike Paths are fully separated from vehicles. Development of the site would be in accordance with the Development Code and would not create a hazard to bicyclists or pedestrians. g) Located approximately three miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly of the flight path and would not impact users of aircraft. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signiflcent 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) (v') habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, (~') ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) (,") eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) (v') vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) (v') /55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 14 Comments: a-c) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally the area to the east and south of the site is developed. Based on previous development on-site, and surrounding residential/commemial development and adjacent streets, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. There are a number of mature trees throughout the site, mostly along the east and west property boundaries. Concurrent with the submittal of any development application for the site, a Tree Removal Permit would also be required. d) There are no wetland habitats on the site. e) The site previously contained two commercial buildings that were demolished, and is immediately north of Foothill Boulevard. This development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have traversed the site in the past. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signi~cent 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resoumes in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a/b) The project would be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 and TablelV-1; therefore, there is no impact. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 15 Impact Potentiatly Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Thez~ 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of (v') hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency (,,') response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential (,,') health hazard? d) Exposure of' people to existing sources of (,") potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable (v') brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a,c,d) Development of the site in accordance with its existing designation of Office or under the proposed designation of Mixed Use, would not require the use of hazardous materials. Observations at a recent site visit indicate that the site is kept in a clean matter would no evidence of illegal dumping, discarded 'drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils. b) Once site plans are submitted they will be reviewed to ensure project traffic would not interfere with the flow of traffic along Foothill Boulevard or with evacuation plans or other emergency responses. e) The project site is located along the north side of Foothill Boulevard. The site and areas to the east and south are developed and are within a commercial/residential area. The site is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (-/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (¢') ( ) ( ) 157 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 16 Comments: a) The primary existing noise source in the project area is transportation corridors. Traffic along Foothill Boulevard is the predominant source contributing to the ambient noise level in the area. The project includes a land use designation change from Office to Medium-High Residential. Development of the site under the proposed Medium-High Residential Designation would be compatible with surrounding development. Standard measures contained in the City's Development Code will ensure construction noise will be at less than significant levels. The impact is considered less than significant. b) Development of the site under the proposed designation of Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential and Office would require a Noise Impact Analysis to evaluate the noise impacts associated with the development of apartments/condos. The report shall evaluate long-term traffic noise impacts on-site and any mitigation measures required to reduce long-term noise impacts. The following mitigation measure will ensure noise impacts at the site would be less than significant. 11. Recommendations and/or mitigation measures presented in the noise analysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound barriers and/or building elements designed to reduce interior noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans, Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard immediately west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and is served by a fire station located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue west of Archibald Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes are placed upon project approval. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga G PA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 17 Police Protection -Development of the site would incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services. In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council. Schools - The proposed project includes a land use designation change from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Medium-High Residential and Office. The designation change would include an additional student population not originally intended at the site. Based on a total of 162 apartment/condo units (maximum allowed under proposed Medium-High Residential), a total of 75 students would be generated within the Central School District (0.46 students per dwelling unit), and 32 high school aged students would be generated 'within the Chaffey Joint Unified High School District (0.20 students per dwelling unit). Together elementary/middle and high school aged students would generate a total population of 107 students. The applicant would be required to pay appropriate school impact fees. Public Facilities/Services -Development of the site would incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets. In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (,/) b) Communication systems? (~') c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution (v') facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ("') e) Storm water drainage? ('/) f) Solid waste disposal? (v') g) Local or regional water supplies? (v') Comments: a-g) Development of the site would not require major modification or alterations to the existing utility infrastructure in the immediate area. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 18 Impact Potentially Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signi§canl Mitigation Significant No 13. AESTHETICS, Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ("') ( ) Comments: a-b) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and would be developed in conformance with the landscape and streetscape guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard District. All structures on-site must receive City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee approval prior to project approval. c) Development of the site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. Because of the nature of the existing residential and commercial development surrounding the site, the impacts of light/glare will not be significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant 14. - CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) Although no cultural resources have been observed during previous grading on the site and on surrounding parcels, additional grading on the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources. Since a portion of the site was previously developed with two commercial buildings, the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal and impacts are, therefore, considered to be less than significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 19 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Comments: a) The proposed project includes a land use designation change from Office to Mixed use to allow for Medium-High Residential and Office. The change in land use would incrementally increase the use of existing parks within the Foothill Boulevard Districts; the applicant will be required to pay development impact fees for the proposed apartments/condos. b) The project site is located southerly of the Pacific Electric Trail, a Class I multi-use bicycle and pedestrian trail located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right- of-way, which varies in width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga. Evaluation of site plans will ensure development at the site would not negatively impact the use or enjoyment of the Pacific Electric Trail or any park in City of Rancho Cucamonga. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signilicant 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (~') potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 20 ImpactPotentially Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (,,') ( ) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Currently two commercial building are present on-site. Additionally the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous residential/commercial development and streets, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) The project Site is approximately 7.24 acres in size, and any grading would entail establishing proper drainage and building pads. Development at the site would result in dust and noise, which may be noticeable to existing residents in the immediate area, significant impacts could be avoided through implementation of erosion control and dust suppression measures identified in Sections 4 and 5 of this Initial Study. c) If the proposed land use change were adopted, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The General Plan was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 21 levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. d) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in Section 10 of this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (,,') Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) (~') Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) (,~) United States Fish & Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, Figure 6. September 14. 1997. City of Rancho Cucamong~ Initial Study for GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, DCA2002-00001 Page 22 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I em the applicant for the projeCt described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the prOposed mitigation measures. Further, I ha,~e revised the projeCt plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point ~here clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. ~igna : (~ ~ / ~ ' City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project FileNo.: General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 Review Period Closes: February 12, 2003 Project Name: Project Applicant: Frazier Group Amhitects 1130 Columbia Street Brea, CA 92821 Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel. Project Description: A request to change the General Plan land use designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, the Development District zoning designation within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, and to add a Mixed Use zoning designation description to Sections 17.08.030.F and 17.32 of the Development Code from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and Medium Residential, or Office and Medium High Residential in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) for 7.24 acres of land. - APN: 207-101-32, 33 and 50 FINDING This is to advise that the City o1 Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is Invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. March 19, 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By ]?, ' oo3 HAR 1 7 2003 P.a~h Cucamonga City Council 10~00 Civic Comer Drivo Rancho Cucamo-~.CA 91729 We amag-ln~t &e ~dti-dweJli-$ C-mel~l Plan Amandmm~t GPA2002-00001 - Fmiz~ Credo, D~velopmant Distric~ Amcndmont DDA2002-00001 - Fralzm' Group, Ired Development Code Amendment DCA2002-O0001 - Fraizcr Group and anyd~ing mla~d. The City has already takan Food_hill and mad~ it a vc~r ,mRrie~dly hi~hvmy by ~ i~ u divided Th~ m~a in quesfio~ is the north side of Foothill. west o£th~ Cucamtm~ ~. Them al~ " already signals at C-rove, San Bomardino Road at Sycamore I--; l~dmr, for tho ~-w ms~dm~ial ama ~ the south sid~ of Foothill and a~ V*me~ Mom hou~ rm th~ nmlh side will create · moro traffic problmm because thc~o will bo vehicles comin8 from both the no~th ami ~zth sidm~ of Foothill. Because of the congeslion on Foothill already ffavoling ovm' R~l Hill to avoid tho traffic. Ci~.~ms have ~all~d th~ polic~ to i also soo that the City is a]lowil~g a now m~ltJ-dwclling to bt~i~ o~ tho w~a~" ~i~k'~ Of Vil~a/al' and now you want to craze more trafR~ problem, around the comm'. The City has also allowed mor~ hansing to begin on tho west side of Can~',lian, north of Rmi Hill pulling out of thc ho~sing track am going to cause mom accidm~ts (but I am sum ~h~re will ~ another si~-~ ~t tha~ope-i-_- c~-~ throe Si~-I, betwe~ Foothill m~d Basdine.) ~e al~ very much n~in~ housing (multi or si~gl¢) on th~ north ~ of Foothill; w~t ortho C~e_~.o.~ C~.--eL Them is so much mom lami in other Shr. crcly, Charles and L-~ynda Tccnor 8731 Red Hill County Club Drivo Cuc mon cA ! 7 2003 RESOLUt,ON NO. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP PROVISIONS FROM OFFICE TO MIXED USE FOR 7.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-101-32, 33, AND 50. A. Recitals. 1. The Frazier Group filed an application for General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated Development District Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications and issued Resolution No. 03-18 and Resolution No. 03-19, respectively, recommending to the City Council that Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001 and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 be approved. 2. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-17. 3. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated Development District Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications and issued Resolution No. * and Resolution No. __, respectively, approving the associated Development District Amendment DDA2.002-00001 and Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001. 4. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on March 19, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP Mamh 19, 2003 Page 2 a. The application applies to approximately 7.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and ' b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and is the Vineyard Town Center. The property to the south is designated Medium Residential and developed with a trailer park and single-family homes. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by existing Medium Density residential development and commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. ' That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP Mamh19,2003 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below. Environmental Mitiqation: Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PMlo emissions, in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403. 2) Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMlo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 4 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Noise 1 ) Recommendations and/or mitigation measures presented in the noise analysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound barriem and/or building elements designed to reduce interior noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001 to change the land use designation from Office to Mixed Use for the site identified in this Resolution and shown in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and to add the following text to the General Plan Land Use Element, Section 2.5.5: "The City has identified the following areas for special mixed use consideration: Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonqa Channel Site - This 7.24-acre site is significant within Subarea I of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. At the southern base of "Red Hill," the site is strategically located near the northwest corner Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Like other newly designated Mixed Use districts, this site presents an opportunity to expand commercial office activity, while providing an opportunity for new multi-family development in the City. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0%- 100% 0 -7.24 acres (8-14 dwelling units per acre) * Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres · This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 5 The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the corresponding sections of the Land Use Element." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, and DCA2002-00001 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This precedura designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /?/ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. AIl MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner er responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated cimumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms Of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits. I:~INAL\CEQA'~vlMP Form-rev.wpd 172. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-0001, & DCA2002-0001 Applicant: Frazier Group Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: December 30, 2002 Prior to )ssuanco of grading pemtits, ~he applicant shall prepare a CP/CE B IReviewofplans I C 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention P)an that identities Best Management Practices to be implemented during the pedod the site is I I under Construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. , Air Qual,ity ~': :*'*~'. ,'~ : ~:~,,~. ~;~ c~:* ~, *~ ,~ .,~, . , ~ . ~. ~, The site shall be treated with water or other acil-stabilizing agent CP C Review of plans C (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to ~duce PMIo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Streets a~Jjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of plans C established by the City to reduce PMm emissions associated with 2 vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of plans C 2 25 miles per hour to minimize PMIo emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of plans C 2 be applied to all inacUve construction areas that remain inactive for · 96 hours or more to reduce PMlo emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B Review of plans C 2 used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The eenstrucUon contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. The eenstnJction contractor shall uUlize electric ordean altemaUve fuel CP C Review of plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B Review of plans C 2 plans include a statement that work crews will shutoff equipmeet when not in use. Recommendations and/or miUgation measures presented in the noise CP D Review of plans A/C 3 J--lanalysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound ba~ers and/or building elements designed to reduce intedor noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Respo.~!~!ei~erson~, ' . ~ ~ =~ '~ i ~Monltorl~g~Fre~U~nc~ ,~M~tb~of Yar~lflca~lo~.,!~.~t'.' ~ ~: '" ....... ~ ~ ~:~ ?~'" ~.~-~ :~i~" ;~'~ ........ ~San=lons~ '~ .... ' ~' ~ ~"~ .... CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occu BO - Euilding Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop, Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP General Plan Land Use Map 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet N ORDINANCE NO. ?~, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DDA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM OFFICE TO MIXED USE FOR 7.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-101-32, 33 AND 50. A. Recitals. 1. The Frazier Group filed an application for Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 03-17, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001 be approved. 3. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-18. 4. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. __, approving the associated General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001. 5. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and conducted said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on March 19, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 7.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and /?4 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 2 b. The properly to the north of the subject site is vacant and the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Community Commemial and is the Vineyard Town Center. The prepertyto the south is designated Medium Residential and developed with a trailer park and single-family homes. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by existing medium density residential development and commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below. /'77 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP Mamh 19, 2003 Page 3 Environmental Mitiqation: Water 1 ) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction, Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plan for review and approval bythe City Engineer. Air Quality 1 ) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with South Coast Air Quality' Management District Rule 403. 2) Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing mayvary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA2002-00001 - FRAZiER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 4 Noise 1 ) Recommendations and/or mitigation measures presented in the noise analysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound barriers and/or building elements designed to reduce interior noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001 to change the district from Office to Mixed Use for the site identified in this Ordinance, as shown on Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-00001, and DCA2002-00001 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resoumes Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval ara contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enfomement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identity the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\FINAL\C EQA'~M MP Form-rev.wpd MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART Ill) Project File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-0001, & DCA2002-0001 Applicant: Frazier Group Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: December 30, 2002 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Air Quality The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent CP C Review of plans C 2 (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to_reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of plans C 2 established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction, Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of plans C 2 25 miles per hour to minimize PMi~ emissions from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of plans C 2 be applied to ail inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B Review of plans C 2 used on-s!te based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment w~ll be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or dean alternative fuel CP C Review of plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shal~ ensure that construction-grading CP B Review of plans C 2 plans include a statement that work crews wtil shut off equipment when not in use. Noise ' Recommendations and/or m[figation measures i~resented in the noise CP D Review of plans A/C 3 analysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound barriers and/or building elements designed to reduce interior noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. Key to Checklist Abbreviations RespOnsible Person Monitoring Frequency I ~eth°d of Verification Sanctions COD - Community Development Director or designee A- With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To ConstrucUon B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans} 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP ORDINANCE NO. ?~.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA2002-00001, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OFFICE USES, OR MEDIUM- HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OFFICE USES WHEN DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.08 AND 17.32 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR 7,24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-101-32, 33 AND 50. A. Recitals. 1. The Frazier Group filed an application for Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment applications and issued Resolution No. 03-17 and Resolution No. 03-18, respectively, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001 and Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001 be approved. 3. On January 22, and continued to February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval ofthe application bythe adoption of Resolution No. 03-19. 4. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly, noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment applications and issued Resolution No. and Ordinance , respectively, approving the associated General Plan Amendment GPA2002-00001 and Development District Amendment DDA2002-00001. 5. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and conducted said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as ¢ollows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on Mamh 19, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development by permitting joint development of varying uses already listed in the General Plan; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by allowing the innovative use of existing development standards to expand the range of uses within a development project; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity by mandating the continued use of existing development procedures and standards for Mixed Use districts; and d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives of the Development Code by continuing a policy encouraging quality development through the innovative application of existing design standards. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP Mamh 19, 2003 Page 3 Environmental Miti.qation: Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plan for review and approval bythe City Engineer. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management Board Rule 403. 2) Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMlo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Board and Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA2002-00001 - FRAZIER GROUP March 19, 2003 Page 4 Noise 1 ) Recommendations and/or mitigation measures presented in the noise analysis shall become a part of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the project. If sound barriers and/or building elements designed to reduce interior noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife ' depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DCA2002-00001 to establish a Mixed Use District at the site identified in this Ordinance as shown in attached Exhibit "A," by modifying the text in Sections 17.08 and 17.32 as shown on attached Exhibit "B" and modifying the Subarea 1 Land Use Plan in Section 17.32.080 as shown on attached Exhibit "C." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP ~ 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet N ..~ ' , Section 17.08.030.F.3., Mixed Use Districts, shall be amended to add the following new subsection (new text is in bold): "3. Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonfla Channel site - This 7.24.acrs site is located at the base of "Red Hill" on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres (8-14 dwelling units per acre) * Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to a Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, 17.10, and 17.32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District." · This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). Section 17.32.020.C. Office. 3, Mixed Use, shall be amended to add the following at the end of the section (new text is in bold): The following table specifies the uses and the range of development for the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel: NWC Foothill Boulevard and Cucamon.qa Channel Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres (8-t4 dwellin9 units per acre)* Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres * This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). Section 17.32.080.A. Subarea 1.7.b, Permitted and Conditionally permitted uses, shall be amended to read as follows (new text is in bold): b. Permitted and Conditionally permitted uses: Refer to Table 17.32.030. At the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel, a Mixed Use District allows Medium Residential and/or Office, or Medium-High Residential and/or Office if developed in conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), as provided in Section 17.32.020.C.3. In the Bear Gulch area, along both sides of Foothill Boulevard, a Mixed Use District allows Commercial and/or Medium Residential/Medium-High Residential as provided in Section 17.32.020.C.3 Foothill SC RESIDENTIAL ~ LOW DENB~y RESIDENTIAL ~ OF~E IAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE INDUS~IAL ~ MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ~ LISHT INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ~ REGIONAL"IE~TED COMMERCIAL City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-O0001, and DCA2002-00001 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that ad. opted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the. following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure'conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is vedfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. AIl MMP Reporting Forms for animpact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms 'of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:~FINAL\CEQA'~MP Form-rev.wpd MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Projec~ File No.: GPA2002-00001, DDA2002-0001, & DCA2002-0001 Applicant: Frazier Group Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: December 30, 2002 Air Quality The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent CP C Review of plans C 2 (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review bf plans C 2 established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vaPJ depending upon time of year of,construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of plans C 2 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~0 emissions f~om the site during such episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of plans C 2 be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PU~o emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B Review of plans C 2 used on-sita based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. The cons~fruction centractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel CP C Review of plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible. The ceostmction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B Reviewofplans C 2 plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when Noise- Recommendations and/or mitigation measures presented in the noise CP D Review of plans A/C 3 analysis shall became a part of the Mitigation MonitaHng Plan for the project, if sound barriers and/or building elements designed to reduce ~ i ntedor noise levels are required, then they shall be incorporated into design plans. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Respons ble Person M0nlt0rlngFr~que~ncy MethOd 0f veriflca! on~ * S~,nctlons CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation oi Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittat (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO ' Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP TH CITY OF I~AN C It 0 CIJCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Mike Smith, Planning Technician SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A request to amend Section 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, permitting private school uses within all four subareas and modifying the requirements for public hearing notices within the Foothill Boulevard Districts to a 300-foot radius of proposed projects. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00031 by adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Section 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) of the Development Code currently classifies education related uses into categories that are too narrowly defined and severely limits where these uses may be located in the four subareas of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. Also, the additional public notification requirement for projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the Foothill Boulevard Districts is too burdensome. On December 11, 2002, staff submitted a request to initiate an amendment to Section 17.32 of the Development Code to address these issues. The Planning Commission agreed with staff and directed staff to proceed with the amendment. On February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed this Development Code Amendment proposed by staff. The amendment revises the use regulations table to combine and include the broad range of educational uses under a single heading of "educational services." The amendment also allows educational uses in more zones of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. In addition, the amendment eliminates the subarea-wide notification requirement for projects subject to a Conditional Use Permit review (Exhibit "A"). The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this amendment to the City Council through the adoption of Resolution No. 03-22 (Exhibit "B"). City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 12, 2003 Exhibit"B" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-22 Draft Ordinance approving Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00031 /?7 THE CITY OF I~AN C Il 0 CI~CAMONCA s Repor DATE: February 12, 2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, city'Planner BY: Mike Smith, Planning Technician Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO · CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code permitting pdvate school uses and modifying the public hearing requirements within each of the four subareas of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission hearing on December 11, 2002, staff requested to add private school as a conditionally permitted use in the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The Planning Commission directed staff to process the amendment for their review and recommendation to the City Council. ANALYSIS A. Existinq Use Requlations on Educational Use within Foothill Districts: A review of the land use matrix in the Foothill Districts shows that there are two land use categories on schools, namely "Education Institutional, Parochial, Private (including colleges and universities),' and "Vocational or Business Trade Schools.' These two land use categories are listed as conditionally permitted in the Office (O) zone of Subarea 4 only. The land use matrix also lists "Music, Dance and Martial Arts'Studios,' as conditionally permitted in the Specialty Commemial zone and permitted in the Community Commercial zone in all subareas. Music, dance or martial arts studios are a genre of instructional schools specializing in teaching the arts and sports. Exhibit 'B" includes the current land use matrix. B. Proposed Use Requlations on Educational Use within Foothill Districts: 1. The Wide Variety of Schools: As stated above, the current code limits the types of schools or educational uses to private schools, higher educational facilities, such as colleges, or trade schools, such as secretarial schools. Other types of education fac!lities or services that have programs for tutpdng, apprenticeship, exam preparation, advance academic instruction, special education for at-dsk students, etc., are not addressed in the Code. An example of such an education facility is FXHIRIT 'A' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 12, 2003 Page 2 'Options for Youth,' an educational service geared toward at-risk students. It was the review of 'Options for Youth' that led to the proposed amendment. Other examples are: Sylvan Learning Centers for tutoring or exam preparation, schools specializing in teaching languages, schools specializing in professional and management training, and so forth. Attached is Exhibit 'D' that shows the realm of educational services according to the North Amedcan Industry Classification System issued by United Stated Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2. The Proposed Chanqes and Benefits: Staff believes that expanding school uses will benefit the City as they will help fill up some of the leaseable spaces within existing commemial and office centers and promote businesses along Foothill Boulevard; The various educational facilities will provide valuable services and amenities to our community and its residents. For clarity and ease of use, staff proposes to modify the land use matrix by grouping the school uses under a single heading of · Educational Services' and as shown below and in Exhibit 'C.' The new educational services will be allowed in the Specialty Commemial, Community Commercial, Commercial Office, and Office zones in all four subareas, subject to review and approval by City Planner through the Conditional Use Permit process as listed below: EDUCATIONAL SERVICES · Educational Institutions: Public, Parochial, Private, Colleges and Universities · Instruction, tutoring, counseling, testing, training schools and facilities · Vocational, Technical, Trade, Business, Professional schools · Miscellaneous schools C. Proposed Public Hearin.q Chanqes Within Foothill Districts: This proposed Change is to streamline the notification process. Existing codes require subarea-wide notification for any project that is under the review of a Conditional Use Permit. This requirement is in addition to notifying propert3/owners within 300 feet radius of the applicant's property. For non-construction Conditional Use Permits such as establishing a use in a leased space of an existing developed commercial center, the additional public hearing requirement is burdensome for the applicant. Potential issues such as parking adequacy, noise, and compatibility can be addressed and mitigated during the Conditional Use Permit review. Staff believes that the Public Hearing requirements under Section 17.02.110 are more than adequate in promoting public notification and citizen participation. Under this Public Hearing Section of the Code, besides the typical 300-foot radius for notification, the City Planner will require the posting of the large 4 by 8-foot notification sign on site for development types of projects. The City Planner may further require public notification in an expanded area on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, staff recommends that the language requiring subarea-wide notification be eliminated for areas within Foothill Districts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, with an eighth-page advertisement. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment in accordan, ce with the California E. nvironmental Quality Act. of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 12, 2003 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00031 to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:MS:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity/Location Map Exhibit "B" - Section 17.32,030 - Use Regulations (existing) Exhibit "C" - Section 17,32.030 - Use Regulations (incorporating changes) Exhibit"D"- Educational Services, North American Industry Classification System Exhibit "E" - December 11, 2002 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment DRY1 Proposed Ordinance rtl -- FOOTHILL BOULEVARD _133 ~ DISTRICTS -"l Vicinity Map and ~,, Location Map Detail Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.32.030 shaft be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter 'P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the latter "C,' the use shall be a conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficuity in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Development Code. B. Conditionally Pen'nitted Uses. Conditionally perm~e~ uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commiss]on or City Planner. Projects rsquiring a Conditional U r ' sh I b e..'.dt.o o ,I .~.h EXHIBIT 'B' Table 17.32.030 - Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses Subarea O~e I Subarea Two SubareaThree Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES I SC CC O MR P ,SC CC O MR ~H SCICC CO MR U MU CC ~H MR U~ O Antique Shops P P P P P P P~ P P a) Boutiques P P P P P P P P P b) General P P P P P P P P Appliance Stores and Repair P P P P P Art, Music, Photographic Studios p P P P P P P P P I=4 C and Supply Stores ~,uto Service Station C C C C C C C C C ~,uto Service (including traJlem, motorcycles, boats, campers): p P P P C ]) Sa]es (with ancillary repair · facilities) P P P P P P )) Rentals p p p p p =) Minor Repair (does not include major engine wo~k, muffler C C C shops, painting, body ~ up~x~stmy, eto.) C C C C e) Automat~ Weshing i~ Parts and Supplies P P P P P Bakeries (retail only} P P P P P P P P P P Barber and Beaut-/Shops P P P P P P P P P P P ~ P Bed and Breakfast C C C C C C C C C Bicycle Shopa P P P P P P P 31ueprint and PhotocopY Services P P P P P P P P P ~ Gift and Sta~onery Stores p p p p p p P P P P P P c >ther than adult related material) ~.andy and Confectioneries P P P P P P P P P .'~atering Establishments P P P P P P P P P .~hirm and Glassware Stores P P P P P P P P~ :hdslmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales ~ p p p p (operating on a temporary basis) Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Cleaning and Pressing p p P P P P P P P P P P C Establishmonts Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, ~avem) Inciuding related C C C C C C C C C C C C antertainmont ~ommercial Recreational: ~) Indoor uses such as bowling p p p p p p p p p p p and billiards b) Outdoor uses such as tennis C C C C C C C C C and baskeltmll Convalescent Facil~es & Hospitals P P P P P P P P P P P P P Curtain and DrapeP~ Shops P P P P P P P Day Care Centers C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Delicatessens and Specialty Food p p p p p p p p p Stores D.~-uq Stores and Pharmacies a) Over 10~000 square feet P P P P P P ~) Phafmecies ~ or without specialty retail under 10,000 C P C P C P P P square feet .-'Jectronlcs Sales and Service (TVs, p p p p p p Stereea~ radios~ computers} Subaree One Sub~rea Two I M~H ~ETAIL COMMERCIAL USES 'CC O IMRI P SC CC 0 MR SC CC CO ~L~ MR U MU CC R~R MR LI' 0 =rivate (including colleges and C Jniversitius) · =loot Covedng Shops P P P P P =lorist Shops P ' P P P P P P P P P P P P =ursiture Stores P P P P P P P P -leelth and Athletic Gyms and C P I IC P C P C P P P~ P Neight Reducing Clinics -lobby Shops P P P P P P P ~e Cream Stores and Soda p p p p p p p p p p~ Fountains Janitorial Senaces and Surn~i'~ p p P P I:~ C Jewelry Storus P P P P P P P P Laundry (Serf Service) P P P P P Leather Goods and Luggage Stores P P I I I p p p P P P Ll~'!hr Stor~8 C C C C C C C C Messenger and Wire Services P P P P P P P Mixed Use Public Storage C~ Music, Dance, and Martial Arts C P C P C P P P Newspaper and Magazine Stores P P P P P P P P P P P Nurserius end Garden Supfdy p p p p p ~tores within enclosed area Dffloe, Business Machine and p p p p p P P P P C ~rsputer Component Stores :)ffice Supply Stores P P P P P P P P P P =aint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores P P P P P Peitdng Facilities (commemisl . ~ C where fees are charged) ' Pan~s and Renreatlo~ Faollitlos, I I C )ublic and private Photocopy (Xmox) P P P P P P P Political or Philanthropicill c pu'ollo and private Clube endP Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, ~ C and similar Youth Group Uses Recoil and Taps Stores P P P P P P P P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards C with entertainment end/or C C C C C C C C C C C ~) .incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocldati lounge, P P P P P P P P P P P P bar, entertainment or dancing) c) nsf§, limited to 20 seats p p p p p p p p p p p (including outdoor seating) Wilhout dr;ye-thru P P P P P P P P P Specialty RetaiJ P P/I P P P P P s) Specialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, Mountaineering, Fishing P P P P P P P P P )) General; encornpasslng a p p p p' p variety of sports e~uipment Supermarkets P ~ I 'J P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Tl~ree Sub~ea Four RETAIL COMMERCIALUSES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR SC CC CO R iMR U MU CC 'MR U2. O Swimming Pool Sen, ices and p p p p p Supplies Tailor Shops P P P P P P P P Toy Stores P P P P P P P P Variety Department Stores, Junior C P C P C P P P Department Stores Veterinarv ~domest~c): a) Non-boating P O P C p p P P C Vocational or Business Trade I~' -~-~~ ~_.__ ~.~-..--- __-..~ ~. ~...- __ __ ,. Yarda~le Goods Stores r P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four ENTERTAINMENT AND I~H RcR CULTURAL USES SC CC O :MR P SC CC O !MR SC CC CO RL~ MR U MU CC MR LI~ O ~,.rcades C C C C C C C C a) Indoor Galle~ and A~t Sales P C p P C P P :~) Outdoor Art Exhibits P C P C P C C 3iscotheques C C C C C C C C ~) Dinner Thestor P P P P P C 3) Movie Theater Irmluding p p p p p Multiplex Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVE · USES Sc CC Io .R . SC I C~ O ,~. ~ 'SC CC Oo ~' .. U .,U CC "CR .R .' O Adminis~eflve. Business and p P P P P P P P P P P p4 p Prof~.innfll Offices Banks, Finance ~ and P P P P F P P P P P P P P institutlo~s~ Includlllg drive-film Business and Office Bawices P P P P P P P P P ;.,[e~,~r Decorating Firm~ P P P P P P P P P P P Medical/Dental Offices and Related p P P P P P P P P p4 p Health Clinics 3ptician and Optometrist Sho~ P P P P P' P P P P P' P Realtors and Real Estate Offices P P P P P P P P P P P P" P rravelAgencles P P P P P P P P P P P P' P Subarea One ITransit Facilities IFub"cUt¥"~ta"et~s I I J I I I I I 1 ~ I I f I ~ ~'~ ~ ~'~ I ~ IRESIDENTIALUSES I' Subarea One ISubarea, Two I Subarea Three I, Subarea Four Iscl col o IMRI. Isolccl o I RI "l cl CC IooI I Rl" I ulCCI"oR I RI "=1 Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Tl~ree Subarea Four RESlDE~IALUSES SC CC O MR P SC ~ O MR SC ~ CO R Single-Family Detach~ P P P P Stngl~Family A~ch~ (du~e~ p p p p p p p :flplex, fou~lex) ~ulti-Family Dwellin~ P P P P P P ~ncillaw Residential Us~: ~) H~m facil~ (6 or I~) P P P P P P P 3) ~sEe p~ ~ p p p p p p p facil~ a) A~e~ ~ P P P P P P P 3~ Home ~upa~ P P P P P P P ~ Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four -IO'FELUSES SC CC O MR P SC CC, O MR I~H SC CC CO L~ MR U MU CC ~R MR LI~ O -Iotel/Motet C P -Iotel Facilities (major) P Ancillary Uses: a) Beauty/Barber Shop P b) Cafes P c) Cater~g Sewicea P d) Cocktail Lounge P e) Confereme/C(mvenlfon p Facilltiea 0 Rorist Shops P ;) e~t shc~ P ~) Newspaper/Magazine Stores P Pharma~ea P Restaurants (sit down) P () Tourist information P Travel A~encles P Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.32.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard. Districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter 'P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter NC," the use shall be a conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Development Code. B. Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, ara subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. EXHIBIT 'C' Table 17.32.030- Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses Subarea O~e Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES sc cc o ... sc !M. "." sc cc co u .u %" .. o Antique Shops P P P P P P P~ P P Appa~: a) Boutiques P P P P P P P P P ~) General P P P P P P P P Appliance Stores and Re~alr P P P P P Art, Music, photographic Studios p P P P P P P P , P I=4 C ~nd Supply Stores Auto Service Station C C C C C C C C C ~,uto Sen. ine (including trailers, motorcycles, boats, campers): P P P P C I) Salea (with ancillary repair facilities) 'P P P P P P b) Reetats c) Mionr Repair (does not lodude P P P P P major engine werk, muffler C C C sham, painting, body wo~ upholstap/, etc.) C C C C d) ~ weeh~O s) Automatlo Weehlng ~) Parts and Supplies P P P P P Bake~ios (retail only) P P P P P P P P P P 3arber and Beauty Shops P P P P P P P P P P P I~ P 3ed and Breakfast C C C C C C C C C )icycle Shop~ P P P P P P ? Blueprint and Photocopy Sen'leas P P P P P P P P P Book, Gift and Sfa0onery Stores p P P P P P P P P P P P C (o~er thee adult mlatad mataHaJ) Candy and Confectioneries P P P P P P P P P P~ Catering Establishments P P P P P P P P P ;hina and Glassware Stores P P P P P P P I~ Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots p p p p (opemltng on a ternporary basis) Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C, Cleaning and Preeab~ p P P P P P P P P P P P C Establishments .3ocktall Lounge (bar, lounge, avem) lndudingrefated C C C C C C C C C C C C )ntarfalnment ~ommemial Recreational: a) Indoor uses such as bowflng p p p p p p p p p p p and billiards b) Outdooreseseuci~astennls C C C C C C C C C and basketball Convalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P P P P P P P P P P P Curtain and Drapery Shops P P P P P P P Day Care Centers C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Delicatessens and Specialty Food p p p p p p p p p , 1=4 5-'torea ::)ma Stores and Pharmaciea l) Over 10r000 square faet P P P P P P )) Pharmacies with or without spscia~y mfa~ under 10,000 C P C P C P P P square feet Electronics Sales and Sewlea (TVs, p p p p p p Stereos~ mdios~ computers) Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four . ^..COMME.O,^LUSES CCI O I M"J" CC O SC CC CO M. U MU M. U' O Colleges Un~em[~ )) Ins~n, ~od~, ~unseling, testing,~ining C C CC C C C C C C C C C C ~s a~ ~cil~ B~ln~, a~ P~ ~ Miscellan~s~s ~ C C C ~ ~ C f- Flofl~ Sho~ P P P P P P P P P P P P P FumitumS~ P PI I I P P P P P P Hea~a~A~l~G~ C P~ C , P C P C P P ~ P W~ght R~ing Clin~ Hob~ S~ P P P P P P P ~ I~ Cr~ ~ms ~ ~ p p p p p p p p p ~ Fou~l~ Jan~odal Se~ a~ Suppli~ P P P P ~ ~ Jewel~S~ P :1 I I P P P P P P ~und~ (SeE Se~) P P P P L~uor~o~ C C C C C C C ~essen~er a~ Wire Se~ P I P P P P P ~ ~ix~ Use Publ~ Stom~ ~ ~uaHes a~ C~ete~, C ~e~pa~r a~ ~e~e~!~e S~ P P P P P P P P P P P ~ ~ume~ea a~ Ga~ S~ p p p p p ;~, B~i~ Ma~l~ ~ p p p p p p P P P C Pai~ Gla~ and Wall~r S~ PP ] P P P P Pa~ing Faca~ (~ C ~ere f~s am c~ Pa~ a~ R~ Fac~, C ~1~ a~ p~ Pet S~ P P P P P P P ~ p~ (Xerox) P J P P P P P ~ p~ ~ Philan~} C Pu~ ~ P~m CI~ ~ ~, i~l~ ~A, ~CA, C ~ similar YO~ Group U~ R~ a~ Tape S~ P P P P P P P P P R~reat~l Vehicle Stom~ Ya~ C ~ente~i~or C C C C C C C C C C C ~a ~n~, ~r b) inc~ea~l se~ ~ ~ ~ ~(~a~lll~, P P P P P P P P P P P P ~, ente~l~ or d~) c) ~f~, limE~ ~ ~ ~ p p p p p p p p p p p P (i~ing o~r ~flng) W~o~ d~m P P P P P P P P ~ R~ll P P~ ~ ~ P P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four .~A, L COMM~"O'^LUSES SC CO ~0 .. "SC CC 0 !.. ~" ~C,CC CO .~ M" UMU CC ~"CR M. U~ 0 S ortin Goods Stores: l) Spacialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, Mountaineering, Fishing, P P P P P P P P P etc. )) General; encc~npassing a p p p P P variety of =p-~5 equipment Supermarkets P P P P P Swimming Pool Services and p p p P P tailor Shops P P P P P P P P roy Stores P P P P P P P P Variety Depar~eent Stores, Junic~ C P C p C P P P ~,=~ u~nent Stores ~/eterinarv {domestick ~) Non-boarding P C P C p p P P ° )) Boarding C C C C C C Natch and Clock Repair Stores P P P P P P P P P Carda~le Goods Stores P P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four .?.ULTURALUSES SC CC 0 MR p SC CC 0 MR SCi CC CO MR U MU CC MR ~ 0 Aw~d~ C C C C C C C C Cultural Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor Gallery and A~t Sales P C p P C P P b) Outdoor Art E~ ,;[,;;~ P C P C P C C Discot~q,,~ C C C C C C C C 'heaters: a) Dinner Theeter P P P P P C P S) Movle'l~eater Including p p p P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVE ,sEs sc cc oM. .Sc Cc oM. ~" sc CClco ~M.! ~Mu CC "c" M. ~o Administrative, Business and p P P P P P P P P · p P p4 p ~o~e~;onal Offices Banks, Finance Servlcee and p p p p p p p p p P P P P institutions~ including drive-trim Business and Office Sewlees P P P P P P P P P Interior Decorating Flrr~s P P P P P P P P P P P Vledical/Dental Offices and Related p p p p p p p P P I~ P -teallh Clinics 3p[;~;a,~ and OptOmetrist Shops P P P P P P P P P P' P :~ealtors and Real Estate Offices P P P P P P P P P P P P~ P rravelA~encies P P P P P P P P P P P I~ P IPUBLIC I Subarea One I Subarea Two I Subarea Three I Subarea Four USES lTransit Facilities ~,ub,,cU,,,,~insta,,~.~ I IIIIII II ~1~ ~ I I.~~I ~ Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RESIDENTIAL USES SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 MR SC CC CO R MR O !MU CC MR LIs 0 Single-Family Detached P P P P Single-Family Attached (duplex, p p p p p p p tdplex, fourplex) Multi-Family Dwellings P P P P P. P Ancillary Residential Uses: a) Home-care facilities (6 or less) P P P P P P p ~) On-site private recreal~on p p p p p p p facilities ~,ccessorv Uses: ~.) AcceesoPJ Sb'uotures P P P P P P P ~/ Home Occupa'~,oll P P P P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four HOTEL USES SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 MR /~H SC CC CO L~ MR U MU CC ~R,MR I.~ 0 Hotel/Motel C P Hotel Facilities (major) P Ancillary Uses: a) Beauty/Barber Shop P b) Cafes P ~) Catering Sen~ess P :1) Cocktail Lounge P ~) Conference/Conventk~ p Facilities Flodst Shops P :h) Newspaper/Magazine Stores P i) Pham~ack~ P j) Restaurants (sit dam) P k) Toudst Information P II Travel A~encies P 619 Sector 61--Educational Services The Sector as a Whole · Thc Educational Services sec~' comprises esmbllshmen~s 6aat prowde inslruc~on and in a wide variety of subjects. This instruction and training is provided by specialized estab~, such as schools, colleges, universities, and tr~inm~ centers. These establishm~ts may be pnva~ly owned and op6rated for plofit or not for profit, or flaey may be publicly owned and ope~m:L They may also off~ food and accommodation ser~ic~ to ~ sUut~is. sup~iSe, and direct learning. InsuucUon ~s imps~a m ,,,ver~e s~m - _ . the particular needs of ~he smden~ fc~ ¢~,sm.~e sign Ianguage can re. place v~oai language fc~ teaching smgents commonality of ptoc~ -~,,~ly, labor ~ of inslruc~r~ wi~h ~he tequisi~ subject major I11 Educafloml ~ Industries in the Hducafional Services subsector provide instruction and wainlng in a wide vati~y of subj~s. The insm~ion and training is provided by specialized estab~ suc~ as schools, '1~ subsec~x is su~cU~d according to level and type of edtw~fional services. El~mnuuy and ~o a ~cosni~a ~ of formal ~ of edemion desism~d by ~plomaS, associa~ ~ (including equlval~ c~nifica~), and desr~s. The re~i-i~! indmtry sroup~ a~ ba~d mo~ fl~e type of inslruction or tmlnlng off~a~l and lhe levels a~ not always as formally defmod. 'l~ establishments ate of Um highly specls~i~.ed, msny off~ng insU'uc~ion in a ~ limiu~d subject Wifllin ~ se,~,~, level and types of training 6~at a~ requited of fl~ instructors and ~ vary Esta - ' · ~ud provide ~he op~p,~n~ staff. ~am classified in this subsector if they bo~a manage the ol~rauon - ,. ~111 Elementary and Secondary Schools 61111Elementary and Secondary Schoolsc~ See indmU'y de~piion for 611110 below. ~11110 Elementary and SeCOndary Schoolscia · ' 'llshmen~s ....:~,.a,, engaged in furnishlne academic courses This indusUy comprises esmousnm p--~-~ associated course work that comprise a basic lneparat°ry educafi°n' A basic lxeparat°ry educafi°n U ' - ...... ~:-- M~xican, an4 Un~um ~m~s mausmeS ,m~ Wh~. neimer US n~ CAN al:p~w~, ~e ~s: "~ " 6~ ~or ~e ~: EDU. CATIOI~AL $1~RVI(~S. 621 Cmss-Reference~. -. ~: ..... ~ -~.:":, ': ": E~tablishments p~marily engaged in fun~shing academic, or academic and technical, courses and granting associate degrees,.ccrtificates,.O~ dip~or~as bclow.ti~ ~ bacc~l~ aurea~, ievel~ar~ classified in IndusWy 611210, Juni~ Colleges. 611~1 Business Schools and Computer and Management.Trnlnlng 61141 Business and Secretnrinl SchOols : · $6e indtm~ deacripllon fro, 611410 below. 611410 Business and Secretarlnl Schools · . aad' ~'etari~l and' 5teno~hi¢ skills':Shc~' 'of]er courses, i~ basic otb. ce. at-iii% =such as wold processing. In addillon, these establishments may offer stich classes as oflic~'ma611iile operating, reception, communications, and other sk'!!!s.dcsigned for individuals pursu!-g a clerical or.secre- tusial caleea'. .. . :: Cross.Reference. Establishw~uls pr~'m.~ly engaged'in=-- ~; '.. · ' ' · · Offerlng.acst~i~degr~ (e.g., baccalaureate, gra&tnu~.ievel) in busings education.--are clussifi?d in Industry..611310, .Corteges. Unive~ities, and Profesalonal.Schoois; and · Offering tr*!.i.g in the mnintanance and repair of co--are classified in Industry 611519, Oth~ Technical and ~ Schooi~ 61142 Computer See industry desc~iptioa for 611420 below. 6114120 CGmputer 'rr~lnln_a This industry coraprise~ estebli~hment~ primarily engaged in conducting computer training (cxcapt computer rcl~ir), su~ as comput~ programming* soi~ware packagcs~ computerized systems, co~. u~r alecu~ni~ ~cUnolosy, ~0~pu~ ~0.ns, ~ local ~ n~v~k mcn~ li~tm~o0 ma~ beprOvidedat the estabii~s'~ut'S fa~liues Or at an ofr-~itelocatlon, including Cross-Reference~. EstabE. h,,~-nts primarily ~ngaged in-- * O~eFing Igra{nlng:in tl~, l~slrrt~ll~..alld ~ o~ comptlt~3~-9~ classified in Industry 61151, Technical and .Trade.gchools;.and · ~_.omputer retailing, wholesaling, or Computm' system de. si~onlng ~hat may also .provide comput~ t~i,,ing--arc classified in their appropriate industries. US-~Unit~d States industry only. CAN--United States and Canadian industries am comparable. When n¢ithm* US no~ CAN appea~ Canadian, Mexican, and Unitm:l Sta~s industries am comparable. http://w~vmtis,9ov/nai~ 622 ' NORTH AMERICAN. INDUSTRY CL~S$1FICATION sYSTeM 61143 Professional and Management Development Ttalni~ See indus~ description for. 611430 below. 611430 ProfeSsional and Management Development Training This indusUy c. omprlses establishments p~'narily engaged in off. lng an array of short duratien courses and seminars for,management and-professionel development Training for carla' develop- ment may be provided dlrecdy to individuals or through employers' training prog~ms; and cotwses may be customized or modified to meet the special needs of customers, lust~ctlon may be provided at the establishmcnt*s facilities or at an off-site lOCation, including the clicut~ own facilitiea. Cross-ReferenCes. Establishments primarily engaged.in-- · Advising clients on human resource and training issues without providing the are classified in u.s. IndusU~ 541612, Human Resources and Executive Search Const0tln~ Se~ices; and Offering academic degrees (e.g baccalau~ato, 'graduate lsvel)~are classified in 611310, Collegas, Universities and Professional Schools. 6115 T~'ltnical and Trade Schools 61151 Teehnical and Trade Schoo~ This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in offering..vocational and technical training in a variety of technical subjects and trades. The t~ni~_* 'ot~an !~,is to job-specific c~nilicatinu. Illustrative Examples: Alq,i~atic~ship training Inosrams Omphic am scho~s Aviation and flight ~aining instruction schools Modedn~ ~ ' Electmflic cquipmeet repair uainin8 Track drivin~ scilools Cross-Refcrence~. Estab!,sh-,ents t~,~*,ily engaged ~ · Offing courses in office tax~.~lures and s~ctarial and stenographic ~t~n~--me ¢lsesified in indus~ 61141, Business and Secretarial Schools; · Offering compum' training (except compum' repair)--ate cinss~ed in Industry 61142, Computer Training;, · offering professional and management development training, ate classified in IndusUy 61143, professional and Management Development · ' according to the type of school; http://www.ntl$,9ovlna tc~ EDUCATIONAL SERVIC~ in Industry 48121, Nonscheduled ~r. Txansport~on; and. · Offerlng'registexed nursing ll-ai~ing-,-ar~ classified in IndusUy 61121,:luni~ Colleges Industry 61131, Colleges. Univeraili0s'and Professional Schools. This U.S. indusUy comprises establishments primaHly.engagedin offexln_.g Uainlug in.barbering; halt styhng: or file cosmelic lu2s, such ~s makeup or mlr{n c~s~. The~'schoo]~ provitle job-sl:~t~ · ~ Theso e.qtablishme~ may ot~l' ¥ocatiollal Iramm~_; i~onal {y~m~n~: nlsht.u~{-{-_- are classified in U~. IndusU,y 48121~, Othe~ Nons~ Air Trnnsportng~n. 61151~ Apprenliceship Trn~n{ _,~'m Tnls U.S. indust~ comprises establlshments primarily engai~l m offering app~nnceship prognuns. The, se programs involve applied U~{-in~ as well as couts~ 611~L9 Other Technical and ~ Sehodsm or technical comaes (except coam,~iolo~, and barlxsr, training, aviation and n{_t,h~, t~-~-,.g= ,and ized and lc. ad. to job-speci~ certitlcafio~ ' = Ba~nd{~ s,;~o]s Modeling schools C.~miai-ter repau" U,,{nin~'. Track driving ~ · Offering courses iu office procedures and secretarial and stenographic *l,~ns--ar~ cia.smiled in ,.IndusUy 611410. Business and Secretarial Schoo~ ,. · Offerlng~ci~pu~ tr~{r~,~.,.(except cmnpute~.repaiO~are, classitied in .]ndu~,y 611420, US,,--United States industry only, CAN--United States and Ca,',~inn ~:lusuies m.~ comparable. When neither US nor CAN appears. C--*ai*-; Mexican. ,~md United Stat~,indusuies 611430,'Professional an~l~M~gemc~, l)c~cle~mcnt ar~ ~iin Indfist~ 61 l~ZiO~:ttmioi- Collcg~ ot. tfidust~ 611310, Colleges,'Univer~t:ea See indust~/de,scfivtion f~ 611610 below. ~ ~a (~ ~) ~) Cm:-i~e~. '~~ EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 625 61162 Sports and Recrenfion Instruction See indusU'y description for 611620 below. 611620 Sports and Recrenllon Instruction , This industry comprises establishments, such as camps and schools, primarily engaged in offering instruction in athletic activities to groups of individuals. Overnight and day sports iustraction camps a~e included in this industry. Illustrative Examples: Camps, sports instruction Riding iestm~on academies or schools Chocrle~ling instruction Sports (e.g., ba~ball, basketball, football, golf) Gymnnsde~ insm~-fion ' Swinunin~ insm~ction participating in sporting events) · ~tablishmeeta l~imerily angeged in operetieg ovcmlght rcor~tional camps thet may offer some ethletic instruction in addition to other activities ere classified in U.S. IndusU~ 721214, Rcc~eetion end Yecefion Ounps (except cempgrounds); · Es~ebllsluncnts L~imefily eegnged in operefing sixes and recreation establisluncnts thc also offor ed~lcdc in.ruction m'c cl~sified in Sector ?1, Arts. Entar~inrr~nt, and Recrcf~on; · ' Indepsnden~ (i.e., frcalanc~) arhlc~s engaged in providing sports insmicdon and partlcipat- lng in si~:tator spoiling even~ are classified'in U.S. Indus~y 711219, O~hor Spectator Sporu; end · Off~n~ng acedcmic courts that may also offor ethlcUc msU~cuon ere classified ecoop4m~a 61163 Language Schools See indusUy descril~on for 611630 below. 611630 Lang~_m_~e Schools This industry comprises establi~uneets primarily engaged in offering foreign langnnge instruction (including sign lnngnagn). These establislunants nrc destgned to offer language ~nstrucuon ranging from conversational skills for pe~onal enrichment to intensive H-ninlng c, oors~ for career or educational opportunities. C~ss-Refe~ences. Establishments primarily engaged · Offering acndernic courses that tony also offer language instruction--nre classified accord- ing to type of school; and When neith~ US no~ CAN appears. Canadmn, Mexican, ann t~m~ ~,--~-- ...... http://ww~.nfls~gov/rmlo~ tion and J. nteq~retation Services. 61169 All Other Schools and InstrUction This inclusW comprises establishments primarily engaged in offering instruc~on (¢~cept business, COmputer, m~n,~gement, technical, ~ fine arts~ athletic, and language insUuction). Also excluded from this indusUy.nre academic schools, colleges, and universities. Academic tutori~ se~ices Public speak~ Automobile drivins'sctz~ Speed ,,.-,~;,~_~ ~ Cross-References. Establishments prlmnrily engaged in-- , Offering clemently and secondary school instn~c~ion--axe classified in Indusuy 61111, Bcmcnta~ and Secondary Schools; o. Off~ junior collese insmlctioa-~,m~ classified in IndusUy161121, Junim' ColiC'~s; ·Offcring college, university, and professional school insUuctlon with acadcmic de~rees (e.~, baccalam~te, Srach**~)--are classified in lndusuy 61131, Colleges, Universities and · Offel~g btisJl]css, computer (cxccpt computer repah'), and management s~fled~n In~_.~UY Group 6114, Business Schools and Computc~ and Manascmeat ·arc classified in Industry 6!1~1, Technical ~ Trade School~ · Offc~in~ fine arts insa-uction--arc classified in Industry 61161, ~ Aris Schools; · Off~rin~ spore and rcav. ation insuuction--are classified in lndusu7 61162, Spom~and · Offerln~ langua~ instruction--are classified in Industry 6116~, Langua~ Schools. 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutorin~s dardized exami~a~ons and/or acadcmic mtonn8 //lu~t~at/ve Acade~c mto~n8 se~vlces Lcarningc~nte~ offerinS sv. mcd~al College board preparation cent. s Professional examination review instruction. US--United Statr. s industry only. CAN--Unitext States and.Ca~, adian '.mdustfi.es are coml~_,_l,e_- When neither US.nor CAN appea~ ~anadian, Mexican, and Umted Sta~s mdusmes am comparao~. · http-.//www,ntis,gov/nal~s EDUCATIONAL SERVI~.~ 62/ 611692 Automobile Driving Schoolsm 'fhls U.S. industry compr~.s estal~lishment~ prlmm'ily engaged in offering automobile driving Cw~-Refere~_ e-~. Establisl~ments prlmn~y engaged in offering ~r~ck nnd bus ddvlng instmc6on nrc clas.sifie~l, in U.S. lndusuy 611519, Other Technical and Trnde SchoolS. 611699 All Other MEcellnneous ~hools and lnstructionm nnd sutomob~¢ drlVin~ insm~on~. Also e~cluded from th~ indusUy are acedemic schools, colleges, · Offe~ng junin~ ~ol~g~ imm~ion---nre classified in lndu~y 611210, Junint Colleges; (e.g., bnccnln~_*_~'~ gredun~)--nre cln.~ified in IndusUy 611310, Coilage~ Univer~ili~ ~fied in lndusuy Group 6114, Busln~ss Schools and Comlmt~ and l~'nn%mm~nt Trninln~ nrc classified in ~ndustry 61151, Technical nmi Trade $c. ho~ · Offering fine nrt~ insuuc~on---n~ classified in Indumy 611610, ~ A~ $choo~ · Offering sports nnd recreation insut~i~nre classified in lndust~ 611620, Sl~tS nnd · Off~rlng language ins~-uction---a~ classified in lndusUy 611630,.Language Schools; · offering exnm F~mttion and ~ serviees---~e ~ed in U.S. Induslry 611691, Whea neiflm' US nm' CAN ~ ~ :~n~u~n, Meyacan, aaa um~u o,-,~ ,,~ -~-- httD://v~vw.nfls,9ov/nalo~ · 62~ NORTH AMERICAN:INDUSTRY<3.~SSIFICATION SYSTEM · Offering auwmobile driving insuuction~are classified in U;S~.'lndusUy 611692, Autom~ bile Driving Sc. boole. 6117 Educational Support Ser~ces 61171 Educational Support Services S~ indusUy descril~on fo~ 611710 below. 611710 Ed6Ca onal Supp°rt Services This indus~ comprises estab!ishments primarily cngagexl in providing nonln*tmcfiona] Cross-Reference~. Establ~shn~nts primarily engaged in-- . Provldlng job training for l he unemployed, und~mployed, phys~cally disabled, and pe~ms who haw a job market disadvantage becaus~ of lack of education or job classified in Industry 624310. Voca~onal Rehabilitation Sm'vices; and · Conducting research and analyses in cogmilve devdopmeat~ar~ classified in Indus~ 541720. Research and Development in the $o~ial Scima~s and Humanities. US-=-Un~ted States industry only. CAN--United States nnd Canadlnn indus~es nrc comparable. When neither US nor CAN rippers, Canadian, Mexican, and United States industries ar~ comparable. htt p..//www;ntls~g ovin sic. .22/ RESOLUTION NO. 03-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17,32, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, PERMI'I=rlNG PRIVATE SCHOOL USES AND MODIFYING THE PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS WITHIN EACH OF THE FOUR SUBAREAS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00031, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of February 2003, the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. · All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have oc, curmd. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning commission during the above-referenced public headng on February 12, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located'along Foothill Boulevard within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and b. The application contemplates modif~jing the land use regulations table applicable to the Foothill Boulevard Districts to incorporate a single category for educational services which will include a variety of educational institutions, vocational/trade schools, and facilities providing tuto~ng, mentoring, and counseling services; and c. The application cbntemplates allowing educational services in all non-residential zones located within the Foothill Boulevard Districts subject to a Conditional Use Permit review and approval by the City Planner; and d. The application also contemplates eliminating the subarea-wide public hearing requirement for any project within the Foothill Boulevard Districts that is under the review of a Conditional Use Permit. These projects will continue to require notification of the owners of properties located within 300 feet of the subject property; and EXHIBIT 'B' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 03-22 DCA DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 12, 2003 Page 2. e. Additional notification procedures may required for development related projects, as deemed necessary by the City Planner;, and f. The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and with related development. The amendment will offer eY, panded site/location opportunities for educational services; and b. The proposed amendment, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. This amendment allows staff to better assist the public in finding suitable locations for these educational services and streamlines the notification process; and c. The application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and 4. The Planning commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based on substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-00031, as shown in the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2003. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ L~rry T.~Vl~Niel~, Chairman A3-1'EST: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 03-22 DCA DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 12, 2003 Page 3 I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularty introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February 2003, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MAClAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00031, AMENDING SECTION 17.32 (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERMITTING PRIVATE SCHOOL USES WITHIN ALL FOUR SUBAREAS AND MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES OF THE FOUR SUBAREAS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS TO A 300-FOOT RADIUS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. A. Recitals. 1. On February 12, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 03-22, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On March 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public.hearing on the amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Division 6 Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: Section 17.32.030- Use Regulations in the Foothill Boulevard Districts, of the Development Code hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as written below: "B. Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. "; and Table 17.32.030 - Use Regulations Table for the Foothill Boulevard Districts, of the Development Code hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in Exhibit "A." SECTION 5.' If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA DRC2003-00031 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 19, 2003 Page 2 Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Table 17.32.030- Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four oooo. .c MR U MU CC MR LI2 O ADosrel: Antique Shops P P PIP I' P P P' P P a) Boutiques P P PIP I P P P P P b) General P P P ~ P I P P P P Appliance Stores and Repair P /P ! P P P Art, Music, Photographic Studios P P PlIPP P P P P F~ C and Supply Stores ~,uto Service Station C C J C ;~ C C C C C Auto Service (including trailers, / Sales (wi~ ancillary repair facilities) P P P P P P )) Rentals c) Minor Repair (does not include P P P P P major engine work, muffler ~ C C shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) C C C del Coin-op Washing Automatic Washing ~) Parts and Supplias P fP / P P P Bakedes (retail only) P P P( P~ P P P P P P Barber and Bceut~ Shops P ' P P P JP ~ P P P P P P" P Bad and Breakfast C C C / /C C C C C C 3icycle Shops P P P /P j f P P P P~ 31ueprint and Photocopy Services " P /P I ! P P " P P Book, Gift and Stationery Stores P|PI' ' /' P P P P P P c other than adult related material) P P P Candy and Confectioneries P P P IP I Catering Establ~shmenta P P P[P I ! P P P P P Chinaand GlasswamStores P P PIP I / P P P P~ Chrislmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots ! / (operating oll a temporar~ basis) P I~I Ic P P Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C ~ocktail Louogo {bar, Iounga, Commor~i~l ~ooraational: and billiards r Convalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P ; p p p Curtain and Drapery Shops P P P ::)ay Cam Centem C C C C C C C 3elicatessens and Sbacialty Food p p p p p~ ~,toms Druq Stores and Pharmacies Over 10,000 square feet P P P b) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 C P P P square feet Electronics Saias and Service (TVs, Stereos, mdios~ computers) P P P EXHIBIT 'A' SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR SC MR U MU CC RcR MR Educational Services: ,) Public, Paroch,al, Private, CCC C CCC,,,CCC C CCC C Cofleges Universities I I I counseling, testing, training /11 c) Vocational, Technical, Trade, C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Business, and Professional · Schools ~ Miscellaneousschools CCC C CCC~C CC CC C C C armere' Markets ~ P P/ / ~P. P P =umiture Stores P P P P , , P PIi P P -lardware Stores P Pl/ P P P -taallh and Athletic Gyms and C P C P C P C P P ~ P Weight Reducing Clinics Hobby Shops P P P P P P P Ice Crearo Stores and Soda p p p p p p p p Fountains Janitorial Services and Supplies P P P P ~ C Jewalry Stores P P P P P P P Laundry (Self Service) P P P P P Leather Goods and Luggage Stores P P P P P P P Libredes and Museums, public and C ~rivate _icluorStores C C C C C C C C Vlessenger and Wire Services P P P P P P P Vlixsd Use Public Storage C~ vlortuaries and Cemeteries C Music, Dance, and Martial Aris C P C P C P P P Studios Newspepsr and Magazine Stores P P P P P P P P P P P P~ Nurseries and Garden Supply p p p p p ;toms within enclosed area Office, Business Machine and P P P P P P P P P c Computer component stores office supply stores P P P P P P P P P Paint, Glaesr and wallpaper Stores P P P P P ~here fees are charged) C =arks and Recreation Fac~ities, C )ublic and @riva~ =et Shops P P P P P P P Photocopy (Xerox) P P P P P P P Political or Philanthropic C Headquarters PubJic and Private Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, C and sirollar Youth Group Uses Record and Tape Stores P P P P P P P P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards C =lestaumnts (sit down): l) with entertatement and/or C C C C C C C C C C C cocktail lounge, bar )} incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, P P P P P P P P P P P P bar, ente~ainment or dancing) c) cafe, liroited to 20 seats p p p p p p p p p p p p (including outdoor seating) :i) Fast Food: With drive-thru C C C C C C Without drive-thru P P P P P P P P Specialty Retail P P P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES so co o ~MR F SC CC O MR ~H SC CO CO ~ MR U MU CC %R MR L,2 O Sportinq Goods Stores: a) Specialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, Mountaineering, Fishing, P P p p p p p p p etc. b) General; encompassing a p p p p p variety of sports equipment Supermarkets P P P P P Swimming Pool .Se~'~.ee and p p p p p Supplies Tailor Shops P P P P P P P P Toy Stores P P P P P P P P Variety.Department Stores, Junior C P C P C P P P Department Stores Veterinarv ~domestic): a) Non-boarding P C P C P P P P C )) Boarding C C C C C C Natch and Clock Repair Stores P p p p p p p p p r'arda~e Goods Stores P P p p p ENTERTAINMENT AND I Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four CULTURAL USESISC CC O MR P SC CC O MR I~H SC CC CO LMR MR U I MU CC ~R MR LI~ O Arcades C C C C C C C C Cultural Artist Exhibits: 3) Indoor Gallery and Art Sales P C P P C P P ~) Outdoor Art Exhibits P C P C P C C ::)iscotheclues C C C C C C C C [heaters: a) Dinner Theater P P P P P C P B) Movie Theater including p p p p p Multiplex OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVE Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four I MR USES SC cc o. sc cc o I MR ~" sc cc co ~ MR U MU CC "C" MR ',~ O ~,dministratJve, Business and p p p p p p p p p p p p~ p =mfessioeal Offices 3anks, Finance Sen/ices and p p p p p p p p p p p p p nstitutions, including drive-thru Business and Office Services P P P P P P P P p Intador Decorating Fim3s P P P P P P p p p p p · Medical/Dental Offices and Related p P P P P P P P P p4 p Health Clinics Optician and Optometrist Shops P P P p p p p p p p' p Realtors and Real Estate Offices P P P P P P I P P P P P I:~ P Travel Ac~lencies P P P P P PI P P P P P P' P ilPublic Utiiit~ Installations I Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RESIDENTIAL USES I MH LM SC CC O MR P SC CC O !MR "1~' SC CC CO R ~MR U MU CC '~' MR LI2 O Single-Family Detached P P P P Single-Fatally Attached (duplex, p p p p p p p triplex, fourplex) Mutti-Family Dwetlings P P P P P P Ancillary Residential Uses: a) Home-care facilities (6 or less) P P p p P P p b) On-site private recreation p p p p p p p facilities Accessorv Uses: a) Accessory Structures P P P P P P P b/ Horee Occupation P P P P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four HOTEL USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR ~H SC CC CO ~ MR U MU CC RcR'MR LI2 O -{otel/Motel C P -totel Facilities (major) P ~ncillarv Uses: ~) Beauty/Barber Shop P >) Cafes P c) Catering Services P d) Cocktail Lounge P e) Conference/Convention p Facilities 0 Florist Shops P ;) Gift Shops P h) Newspaper/Magazine Stores P Phan~naoles P Restaumnts (sit down) P 0 Toudst Info,'nation P Travel Ac~lencies P r~ a N C H O C U C A M 0 N G a I-NGINEERING DIVISION StaffRelx DATE: March 19, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuira-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIFIED GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2002 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CENTRAL PARK. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the application for the Specified Grant Program under the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002 for the development of Central Park. BACKGROUND Due to the generous support and efforts of State Senator Jim Brulte, the Central Park Project has been designated for $9,335,000 under the 2002 Resources Bond Act, AB 716, Specified Grant Program, as a part of the Proposition 40 State Park Bond Act approved by California voters in March 2002. Up to 25% of the grant amount can be utilized for project planning, appraisals, negotiations and non-construction costs. Central Park, located on the northwest comer of Base Line Road at Milliken Avenue, is 103 acres in size. Incorporating the design of the original Master Plan for the Park, Phase One will consist of a 50,000 square foot community facility that will include a Senior Center and a Community Center, parking to accommodate the facility, as well as 10 - 20 acres of park and open space. It is anticipated that Phase One of Central Park will be completed in November 2004. ~ Kev~ VlcArdl ~;~¥Engineer Com~ n~nity Services Director Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~)~.~' ¢~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO FILE FOR THE SPECIFIED GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CAUFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2002 WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have approved a grant from the program shown above, and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of the Applicant to apply for the funds; and WHEREAS, the Grantee will enter into a contract with the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: 1. Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance from the Specified Grant Program under the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002 and 2. Certified that Applicant understand the assurances and certification in the application form; and 3. Certified that ApPlicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and 4. Certified that Grantee has reviewed and understands the General Provisions contained in the Project Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 5. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of project. Resolution No. Page 2 PASSED, APPROVEO, andADOPTEDthis19hday ofMarch, 2003. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 19th day of March, 2003. T H E C ~ T Y 0 F I~A N CII 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: March 19th, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION That the Council approve the attached agreement between the California State Library and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, accepting the sum of $7,752,688 and agreeing to the conditions of the grant award. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In June of 2002, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library applied for California Public Library Construction bond act funds in the amount of $7,752,688 for the project to be called the Victoria Gardens Library. On December 2, 2002, the California Public Library Construction and Renovation Board ranked the Victoria Gardens Project as "Outstanding" and voted to award funds to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The funds awarded represent 65% of the costs for constructing the library portion of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project, including land value, site development, construction, and the purchase of furnishings, fixtures and equipment to open the new facility. The conditions of the grant award are as follows: 1 ) The City agrees to conform to the requirements of the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, and the regulations implementing the Act. Page 2 Error! No text of specified style in document. Error! No text of specified style in document. 2) Grant payments are made payable on a reimbursement basis. 3) The State will withhold 10% from each payment request, which shall be paid to the City upon the completion of the project and termination of the agreement. 4) Expenditures and project of the Project are subject to audit and examination by the California Department of Finance during the Project and for a period of five years after the final payment has been made. With the approval of this agreement, reimbursement for monies already expended on the project can begin this fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT: The approval of this agreement will make possible the reimbursement to the City of $7,752,688 by the close of the contract on December 31,2005. Respectfully submitted, Library Director GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GRANT AWARD NO: 1030 SECTION 1. THE PARTIES The parties of this Grant Award Agreement are the California State Library (State), the grantor, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the grantee. SECTION 2. THE GRANT As authorized by the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, with the approval of the California Public Library Construction and Renovation Board, the State hereby grants the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Grantee), the sum of $7,752,688 for the purpose of constructing the public library described in Grantee's Public Library Project Application Proposal No. 1030, which proposal is hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. SECTION 3. TERMS OF AGREEMENT A. This agreement is effective upon its execution by both parties and expires on January 30, 2006. B. Prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement, State may extend the term of this Agreement, by written amendment hereto, if State, in its sole discretion, determines such extension is necessary. SECTION 4. GRANT AWARD CONDITION A. in all aspects of administration, implementation, and construction of its public library project, Grantee shall conform to the requirements of the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 (Act), the regulations implementing the Act, and shall expend grant funds in accordance with the Act and applicable regulations. B. Grantee shall construct the library proposed in its Public Library Project Application Proposal No. 1030. SECTION 5. GRANT PAYMENTS A. Grantee shall submit to the State required financial and program performance reports satisfactory to the State Detailing Grantee's expenditure of Grant funds. B. Grant payments shall be payable on a reimbursement basis. C. Payments shall be made no more frequent{y than on a monthly basis. Payment requests shall be made only for eligible project costs. Payment requrests shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the State Librarian, and sent to:Bond Act Fiscal OfficerCalifornia State Library1029 J Street, Suite 400Sacramento, CA 95814916-445-9592 D. In the event that the funding provided is greater than the cost of Project, Grantee shall return the portion of funding which exceeds the cost of the Project to the State. SECTION 6. PAYMENT RETENTION State shall withhold 10% from each payment request, which shall be paid to the Grantee when all of the following have been completed: A. All eligible project costs have been expended; and all required financial and performance reports concerning the Project have been submitted. B. Grantee certifies, by providing a compliance letter from the local building official, that the building has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, including installation of book stacks. C. Grantee shows evidence that the building title has been accepted by Grantee; and, D. All eligible cost issues, identified under interim or final audits performed by The California Department of Finance (DOF), have been resolved. SECTION 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF PAYMENT State may at any time during the term of this Agreement, suspend or terminate payment to Grantee, in whole or in part, in the event of any of the following occurrences: 2 A. If Grantee has made or makes any material misrepresentation with respect to information or statements furnished to the State required by this Agreement. B. If there is any litigation with respect to the performance by Grantee of any of its obligations under this Agreement, which may materially jeopardize or adversely affect the undertaking of, or carrying out of, the purposes of this Agreement. C. If Grantee fails to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. D. If Grantee applies for, or consents to, or acquiesces in the appointment of a receiver, trustee, liquidator or custodian for all or part of its property; or if Grantee files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or petition or an answer seeking liquidation or reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code or any other law related to bankruptcy or insolvency or relief of debtors. SECTION 8. STATE'S RIGHT TO AUDIT A. Grantee shall maintain, by generally accepted accounting principles applicable for local government, a complete record of all financial transactions related to this Agreement. The accounting standards used shall be those promulgated by the Government Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board in effect during the term of this Agreement. B. In determining whether Grant funds are expended for intended purposes as prescribed under this Agreement, the entire Project, including the progress of the Project and Grant fund expenditures, are subject to audit and examination by the California Department of Finance (DOF) during the Project and for a period of five years after the final payment has been made, or for such longer period, if any, as is required by DOF. C. Grantee agrees that the California State Library and DOF auditors or representatives, upon reasonable advance notice to Grantee, shall have access and the right to audit, examine, and made excerpts or transcripts of or from records. Records include contracts, subcontracts, invoices, receipts, payrolls and personnel information, conditions of employment, documents of change orders, budget change requests, indirect costs allocation plan, and all other data or financial records relating to matters covered under this Agreement. D. Grantee further agrees that such right of State to examine or audit shall continue for five (5) years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, or for such longer period, if any, as is required by applicable law. Grantee shall preserve and make available its records (i) until the expiration of five (5) years from the date of expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement, or (ii) for such longer period, if any, as is required by DOF. SECTION 9. INELIGIBLE COSTS, OFFSETAND RESTITUTION A. Ineligible costs may be identified through audits, Grantee monitoring or other sources of information that become available to State. B. Ineligible costs shall also include expended costs concluded to be ineligible during The California Department of Finance's interim or final audits of grant fund expenditures. Further, the ineligible costs may be applied to offset subsequent payments to Grantee required under this Agreement. In the event that ineligible costs exceed subsequent payments, Grantee shall repay the excess to State within ninety (90) days unless otherwise extended by the State. C. Without limiting any other contractual remedies available to State for breach of this Agreement, Grantee agrees to make restitution to State for any cost incurred by Grantee and paid with bond funds that are not allowable under applicable State statutes, rules, regulations, policies and procedures, or the terms of this Agreement. SECTION 10. FUNDING CONTINGENCY Funding of this agreement is contingent upon availability of funding through the sale of General Obligation Bonds and/or General Fund loans requested by State. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any law or additional restrictions, limitations, or conditions enacted by the Legislature that may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner. This contingency will remain in effect during the entire term of the Agreement, including any extension to the term agreed upon by State and Grantee. SECTION 11. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES If Grantee and State cannot agree on disposition of State Building Code (California Code of Regulations, Part 1, Title 24) matters during any reviews by State, State and Grantee may submit such matters to The Division of State Architect (DSA), California Department of General Services, for determination. Both State and Grantee should accept the DSA determination as final disposition of such matters. SECTION 12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Grantee shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of federal, state, and local governments in carrying out its obligations under this agreement. SECTION 13. WAIVER Grantee agrees that waiver by the State of any breach or violation of the terms or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other term or condition contained herein or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or any other term or condition. SECTION 14. SEVERABILITY If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement, or the Application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall to any extent be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of this Agreement, or the Application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. SECTION 15. PRIOR AGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS This Agreement, including all Exhibits attached hereto, represents the entire Agreement of the parties as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by a written amendment duly executed by the parties to this Agreement. SECTION 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. The headings of the sections and subsections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience only. They do not constitute a part of this Agreement and shall not be used in its construction. B. Where this Agreement refers to State and no officer of the State is named, the State Librarian or his or her designee(s) shall have the authority to act on State's behalf. SECTION 17. AUTHORITY AND STATUS OF GRANTEE A. Grantee represents and warrants that the individual who executes this Agreement is duly authorized to do so by Grantee. B. Grantee warrants that it will possess all the necessary licenses and/or permits required by any governmental agency in order to carry out the purpose contemplated herein. APPROVED AS TO FORM CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY STATE LIBRARIAN OF CALIFORNIA DR. KEVIN STARR DATE GRANTEE AGENCY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES St fReport DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE DURING QUAKES BASEBALL GAMES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council provide staff with the direction to keep Rochester Avenue open to through traffic during all weekday and weekend Quakes baseball games, except during those games where attendance is expected to exceed 5,000 fans. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS When the Epicenter first opened and the Quakes began playing baseball games at the Stadium, the City Council approved a policy in which Rochester Avenue would be closed to through traffic during all Quakes games. This policy worked well during the initial seasons when attendance at the games often reached capacity levels. Following a number of refinements over the years relating to the layout and location of traffic control devices, through traffic is controlled as follows during street closure periods: Northbound traffic on Rochester is controlled at Arrow Route. Southbound traffic from Foothill Boulevard is controlled south of the Masi Center at Sebastian. This ensures that access to Masi Plaza is maintained at all times during Quakes games. In July 2000, the City Council took action to open Rochester Avenue to through traffic during weekday ballgames. This action was based on the lessening attendance at weekday games to an average crowd less than 1,500 fans and also on complaints received from nearby businesses and residents who expressed their inconvenience with the street closure. When this policy change was being considered in 2000 staff had discussions with representatives from the Quakes regarding this proposal. The team agreed with the opening of Rochester during weekday games but were opposed to opening the street on weekend game days. This opposition was based on the significantly larger attendance they were experiencing on weekends which caused fans to park in the east parking lot across Rochester Avenue. The Quakes expressed their concern for fan safety and inconvenience in crossing the street. CLOSURE OF ROCHESTER A VENUE March 19, 2003 Page 2 Following the 2000 season, and through 2002, staff and the team have agreed that the weekday opening worked well for both fans and the public. During these discussions in July 2000 and at subsequent times since then, the City Council has expressed interest in opening the street for all games, including weekdays and weekends, in the future. Staff was directed to monitor attendance and traffic patterns on Quakes game days and to pursue potential options for keeping the street open during all but the most highly attended.games. In recent months, Councilmembers have expressed their continuing interest in opening the street during the 2003 season. During last year's season, City staff monitored attendance and traffic considerations on game days and held discussions regarding issues associated with the opening of Rochester on weekends. The following is a brief summary of those staff discussions. ISSUES FAVORING THE STREET OPENING Crowds at the games have continued to lessen on weekends at the Stadium, although attendance is still fairly strong and typically in the 2,000 - 3,000 range. There are four to eight games per season, such as opening day, Fourth of July, and special events where the crowd is near capacity. However, most weekend games are in the smaller range with a limited number of cars parking in the east parking lot. Opening the street will make travel more convenient for local residents and business owners with a limited impact to Quakes fans. CONCERNS ABOUT OPENING ROCHESTER While crowds have decreased on weekend days there are still hundreds of fans who park across Rochester who need to safely cross the street before and after the game. There are, however, signalized intersections and crosswalks which provide an appropriate path. Staff has held more discussion regarding the issue of traffic control on Rochester if the street were open to through traffic. Since the Quakes collect parking fees when cars enter either of the parking lots on the east or west, this results in cars backing up on Rochester at times in both the northbound and southbound directions. This traffic queuing could potentially cause conflict with through traffic. Particular attention would need to be paid to that span of time during each weekend game when fans entering the stadium lots are diverted from entering into the west parking lots and re-directed into the east lot. This will require a temporary stopping of through traffic, resetting the traffic control devices on the street, and re-directing the vehicle queuing. If a decision is made to open Rochester, staff and the Police Department will work with the Quakes to minimize these impacts by moving fee paying operations deeper into the Stadium lots and developing revised traffic control plans. On those days with large crowds of 5,000 fans or more, staff collectively feels that opening the street would present significant traffic control challenges and should therefore be avoided. The other issue associated with opening Rochester involves the relationship between the Quakes and their fans. The team has consistently stated that they are opposed to opening the street for weekend games when fans are parking in the east lot. Their concern relates to the safety and convenience of their fans. CLOSURE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE March 19, 2003 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no significant cost difference to the City under either Rochester scenario. ted, Community Services Director ~Fd~ Professional Baseball Club Ranch° Cucam°n ga ~q~l~r~r~ ~ March 13, 2003 Debra Adams REOEI' City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Ddve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ,~l ! ¥ Ut~ RANCHO Dear Ms. Adams, I would like to request that the agenda item on the closure of Rochester Avenue on the March 19 City Council meeting be postponed. The reason for my request is that there are specific issues that we would like to address in a meeting with the full council or with the Safety Subcommittee. These issues have not been addressed at this time and I do not think that a City Council meeting is the appropriate forum to discuss them. Thank you in advance for this request and you may contact me at 909-481-5000 x201 or at pfilip~one~rcquakes.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Pat Filip~o~ General Manager Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Professional Baseball Club · 8408 RochesterAve · P.O. Box 4139 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Administration (909) 481-5000 · Ticket Office (909) 481-5252 · Fax (909) 481-5005 · www. RCQuakes.com R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES DA'ffi: March 1 @, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the Gi~ Gouncil dack kam, ~lG~, Gi~ Manager ~: Kovin Mc~rOlo, ~ommuni~ So.ices Director Joe O'Neil, Ci~ Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Eme~, Senior Park Planner ~: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE BACKGROUNQ in accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facili~ issues, programs, projects and events, this repo~ is provided to highlight pe~inent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Communi~ Se~ices Depa~ment and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Day Creek Park (Previously Rancho Etiwanda Park): Park construction has been delayed due to recent wind and rains. Tennis cou~ completion now delayed due to discrepancy in the cou~ grades. Concrete crews are continuing fla~ork installation, Developer currently anticipates completion of the park by August 2003. South Etiwanda Park: · The architect is working on the ~nceptual plan. Central Park: Construction documents are being prepared by the architect. Staff is reviewing 50% progress submiEal. A first plan check submi~al is due to the Ci~ on April 8m. East Bell Park: Construction has been delayed due to recent wind and rains. Tot Lot equipment is being installed. Landscape restoration is in progress. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update Mamh 19, 2003 Ralph M, Lewis Park: · The City is manufacturing signs regarding rules and regulations for disk golf course. B, COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · Golden Follies Senior Talent Showcase, Saturday, March 29, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. The cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Montclair, Ontario, Chino and Upland will all participate in the annual Golden Follies Senior Talent Showcase at Montclair Senior Citizens Center. Representing Rancho Cucamonga will be our own singing cowboy, Vern Acree as well as several dancers from our Line Dance Class. Tickets will be sold at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center for $2.00 each. Refreshments and door prizes are included in the price of admission. · Senior Citizens Fine Art Show, Saturday, April 5, 2003 from 10:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. The Senior Center is now accepting registrations for the Annual Senior Citizens Fine Art Show. This Fine Art Show is a non-juried art competition featuring artwork made of the following media: oil/acrylic, watercolor/pastel, mixed media, sculpture, photography, graphite and a new category, fiber arts. Staff is working closely with the Upland Art Association to make this year's Art Show the best ever. The art show will feature demonstrations, entertainment, refreshments, and an awards ceremony. Registrations will be accepted through March 31. Human Services: · Senior Companion Proqram - The Senior Companion Program provides information on services to adults 55 years of age and older. Their volunteers help find transportation for shopping and doctors appointments, reading to the visually impaired, and most importantly being a friend and companion. For assistance please call 593-7511. · Department of A.qin.q and Adult Services - Is available the first Monday of each month from 11:30 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. to answer questions on various issues, such as housing, filing forms and other senior related services. No appointment necessary. · Free Income Tax Service - Free Federal and State income tax assistance is provided by AARP and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This service is offered on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. at the Senior Center. The tax consultants are AARP volunteers and have passed the IRS and State exams. No appointments are necessary. Tax filers will be assisted on a first come, first served basis. This tax service will be provided through April 10, 2003. · Inland Fair Housinq Mediation Board - The Inland Fair Housing Mediation Board can assist in providing information and mediation for such services as applying for ADA certification, problems with the local transit system, counseling for reverse mortgages and many other housing issues. For assistance please call 984-2254 or (800)-321-0911. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 Trips and Tours: · Roy Roqers and Dale Evans Museum, March 22, 2003. Enjoy family photos dating back to Roy and Dale's childhood, colorful costumes, saddles, memorabilia from the silver screen and television and much more at this one of a kind museum. · Dr. Phil and Paramount Studio Tour, April 9, 2003. Travel to Hollywood with us to see a live taping of Dr. Phil and a tour of the Paramount Studios. · Federal Reserve Bank Tour, April 16, 2003. During this informative tour you'll see millions of dollars shredded before your eyes and millions more in highly secured vaults. Volunteer Services: · The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the month of January year 2003: Month: January 2003 YEAR TO DATE #of # of Volunteers # of Hours ~ Value Volunteers # of Hours $ Value ~,dmin 6 28 392 6 28 392 Sports 49 2,712 37,968 49 2,712 37,968 Sr & Human 59 328 4,592 59 328 4,592 Services Special 7 14 196 7 14 196 Events Youth 25 365 5,110 25 365 5,110 Programs Teens: · The table below summarizes teen proqram participation for the month of February 2003: Program Attendance / Month -February 2003 Teen Center 597 Homework Room 38 TRAC - Babysitting 20 TRAC members babysat 57 youngsters TRAC - Monthly meetings 65 Spruce Skate Park 500 · Teen Center. The Teen Center hosted a teen Valentine Day Dance on Saturday February 15, 2003. The dance was held at the Family Sports Center and 420 teens attended. This dance gave youth a chance to interact with other youth from their school on a social level. Our local schools do not have many dances through out the school year, so this dance provides teens an opportunity to have fun in a safe supervised area. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 · The Teen Center Homework Room. Teens are coming to the homework room to do their Internet research for their school projects. The homework room was not used as much as usual by teens this month due to the teens beginning their new semester. · The annual Career Expo will be held on Thursday March 20, 2003, at the RC Family Sports Center. We currently have over 60 businesses registered to participate in the Career Expo. Staff anticipates over 3,000 students with their parent will attend this informative activity. · TRAC teens participate in our monthly meetings. TRAC teens are meeting every month to discuss programs and events they would like to see the City offer to teens in the community. · The Spruce Park Skate Park staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to promote safe skating by handing out donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing their proper gear. · A free Teen Babysitters Workshop was offered to teens on Saturday February 1,2003. This workshop addresses all the information a teen would need to be a responsible babysitter. Our police and fire department along with a representative from San Antonio Community Hospital provided teen's with safety tips on the proper way to handle emergencies as well as information on how to make a home safe for the children they are babysitting. Eight of our TRAC members assisted staff with the 71 participants attending this workshop. · The RCSK8 Crew Skate Club for 10 - 16 years olds meets the first Thursday of each month at the Spruce Park Skate facility. This club allows teens to share their needs with staff about the skate park and allows staff to answer any questions the skaters might have about safety gear. Eight to fifteen youth a month attend this monthly meeting. Youth Activities: · Our Playschool Classes are filling up quickly for our winter session. Currently we have over 3,800 youngsters attending classes at our four locations. Staff had to add additional classes this session to accommodate the need. · On March 15, 2003, a St. Patrick's Day Celebration will take place at Ralph M. Lewis Park. The celebration hours are 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. This festive day will include: live entertainment, D.J., food and craft vendors, children's crafts, carnival type games and an inflatable bouncer. This event sponsored by the Lewis Apartment Communities. City staff is helping to organize the event and funds donated to the Community Foundation in memory of Ralph M. Lewis are being utilized in accordance with Ralph Lewis' request to provide a Terra Vista community celebration. As this event had not taken place at the time this report was prepared, staff will update the Council in their April monthly update repot1 on the success of this activity. · The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a popular neighborhood event. The program served over 593 youth during the month of February. The Mobile Recreation Unit had 1rental for the month of February at the Lewis Evergreen Apartment Complex and served 30 Lewis apartment participants. The Recreation Unit is going to the following park sites during winter/spring: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 Weekday Park Location Program Time ~.~=~ll.~-.',e~.~3.~~-~- ~4' Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30-5:00 pm Tuesday Old Town Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Wednesday Hermosa Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm c~"~°~"~"~*~ Thursday Mountain View Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Friday Windrows Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Grants: · The Teen Connection Staff visited all the local high school campus in February and interacted with over 1,500 students. The numbers are little lower for the month of February due to a couple weeks of high winds causing cancellation of our program on the school campus. The table below illustrates students served during the month of February. Weekday High School Students Served February Monday Los Oso High School 300 Tuesday Etiwanda High School 200 -~'I~ Wednesday SchooIRanch° Cucamonga High 600 ~. Thursday Alta Loma High School 400 ~ ~ · Youth Enrichment Services (YES) attendance is increasing at both the Mulberry Learning Center and the Lions East Center. Location / Site February Attendance Mulberry Learning FACTS Center 269 participants & 359 phone calls Lions East FACTS Center 1881 participants & 199 phone calls Car Seat Safety Checks 66 safety checks Special Interest Classes 131 participants Recreation Classes: · Recreation Classes enrollment for the is high for the winter season. Currently we have over 1,964 participants registered into our 288 contract classes for the winter session. Youth Sports: · The next Sports Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 9th at the Civic Center. The Fall/Winter allocation requests are due at this meeting for the 2003 fall season (August 1, 2003-January 31, 2004). In addition, the Committee will discuss the possibility of fees for field/lights for youth sports groups. · The table on the next page summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 Activity if of Age/Gender if Teams Participants Pee Wee Basketball 200 3-5/boys & girls 20 Pee Wee Soccer 340 3-5/boys & girls 34 Youth Basketball 960 6-15/boys & girls 122 Youth Roller Hockey 153 6-15/boys & girls 17 Youth Track and Field 80 6-15/boys & girls N/A Youth Basketball Camp 60 6-12/boys & girls 60 RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity if of Participants Adult Basketball 1,045 Youth Basketball 1,493 Adult Racquetball 501 Youth Racquetball 113 Adult Volleyball 47 Youth Volleyball 35 Jazzercise 1,214 · The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity # of Participants Age/Gender I if Teams Adult Racquetball 26 Adult/Males[ N/A Adult Basketball (full court) 60 Adult/Males 6 Adult Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 12 Adult Sports: · Four (4) adult softball tournaments will take place at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex during the month of March 2003. · Twenty-seven (27) adults are participating in our tennis leaques this winter. · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity if of Participants if Teams Gender Softball 2,368 148 Males/Females Soccer 848 53 Males/Females Flag Footba 140 14 Males .25b City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update Mamh 19, 2003 Sports Trips: · The Sports Division is offering the community the opportunity to spend the day attending games of some of our local professional sports teams. Future sports trips include the Los Angeles Clippers vs. Toronto Rapters game on March 16th and Los Angeles Kings vs. Boston Bruins game on March 22nd. Cost for each trip is approximately $35.00 per person and includes game ticket and transportation. Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport leaques. For the reporting period, 9 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 188,767 participants and spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times. Community Wide Special Events: · Kids Fest - Due to budget cuts, we will not be having a Kids Fest event this year. · Cinco de Mayo - North Town Housing Development Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department are proud to sponsor Cinco de Mayo for the community. The event will be held at Old Town Park on May 3, 2003, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. The event will include entertainment, food booths, face painting and game booths and other activities for youngsters. · Silver Anniversary - Community Services staff is coordinating the sales of Silver Anniversary T-shirts and Cookbooks. The Commemorative Pins and Calendars were very popular items during the holidays. We are currently planning our exciting Anniversary Celebration for May 10th, at the Epicenter. LeAnn Rimes (American Music and Academy of Country Music Award Winner) and community entertainment, fireworks and a Taste of Rancho Cucamonga will be the star attractions of our celebration of the City's 25th Anniversary. · Event Plannin.q - Staff is currently creating and programming other upcoming events for 2003, including the Fourth of July Celebration, Concerts in the Park and Movies in the Park Series, Founders Day and the Community Foundation's Founder's Night Gala. Performing and Cultural Arts: · ie:ARTS -On February 24th the Inland Empire Arts Alliance forged ahead with volunteer appointments to the group's Steering Committee. Amber Tiedgen (Recording Secretary), Carolyn Grossberg (Correspondence Secretary), Scott Grossberg (Legal Advisor), Ed Tiedgen (Arts Calendar) join Co-Chairpersons Susan Sluka (Cultural Arts Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga) and Jim Ruester (City of San Bernardino) in the effort to formalize and chart the future of the Arts Alliance. A subcommittee, Arts for Schools, was also formed with representatives from the Alta Loma School District, Riverside/Inland Empire Philharmonic, Starlight Productions and also includes Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. An article highlighting the City's efforts in initiating the Arts Alliance ran in City News on February 21st. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 · "Once Upon a Mattress" - Broadway comes to Rancho Cucamonga in the form of a delightful fairy tale titled "Once Upon a Mattress", the City's 4th Community Theatre Production. The 55-member cast is in the final weeks of rehearsal preparing for the April 4tn opening at Alta Loma High School Theatre. To date, twenty-five parents have signed on to volunteer for a variety of duties from selling ads in the program to handling set changes and backstage crew work, providing a valuable and passionate workforce for the production. The musical, which opened on Broadway in 1959 with a young Carol Burnett, then revived in 1996 with Sarah Jessica Parker, is the comical retelling of the Princess and the Pea fairy ' tale. The Community Theatre Program has received a $6,000 sponsorship from Banner Mattress & Simmon's Beauty Rest - a clever tie-in with mattresses in the focus. This production is sure to please even the grumpiest theatre-goer with it's humorous storyline involving an overbearing Queen, a timid Prince, a mute King, a subservient Wizard, a dancing Jester and a crooning Minstrel, not to mention the ever-rambunctious Princess Winnifred, the Woebegone! With modest ticket prices of $8 for adults and $6 for children, the entire family can enjoy a fun and fanciful night at the theatre! · RC Performance Troupe Beqins a Strin.q of Sprinq Performances - After meeting weekly since September the 20 member RC Performance Troupe is ready to strut their stuffi Their first public performance will be held Saturday, March 8th at the Casa Volente Mob e Home Park. The group of twenty youngsters, ages 8 to 16, have learned a variety of musical numbers, in song and dance, and are ready to hit the RC Circuit. Future performances will include the Children's Fund Duck Race, the City's Volunteer Banquet, and the City's Silver Anniversary Event on May 10th. The program will end the 3-quarter commitment with a cabaret-style performance at Lions West in early June. The troupe is available to perform for civic, school, service club and other community events. · Cultural Center Theater Company Recruitment Continues - The City's Cultural Arts and Cultural Center representatives met a second time with the Los Angeles based children's theatre company, Open Window, in the continuing effort to establish the a local theatre company to hold residency in the future Cultural Arts Center. The Group prepared a visual presentation on a "simulated" production of a major musical, offering City representatives their perspective, detail and capability to produce major stage musicals as well as small non- musical productions for families and youth. The Cultural Center Team members present at the meeting were pleased with the overall presentation and will invite Open Window for a third meeting to discuss a possible residency at the Cultural Arts Center. Parks and Facilities: · The table below and on the next page provides information on park/special use facility reservations for the month of February 2003: Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed of Rentals Red Hill 970 19 21 78 Community Park Picnic Shelters Heritage Community 315 9 9 35 Park Picnic Shelters City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed of Rentals Hermosa Park Picnic 170 6 6 24 Shelter Milliken Park Picnic 325 6 6 27 Shelter Coyote Canyon Park 0 0 0 0 Picnic Shelter Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0 Amphitheater 0 0 0 0 Equestrian Center 1,125 6 6 20 Total 3,875 46 48 184 · Not available due to pending Civic Center construction projecL Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usa.qe for the months of March and April 2003 is shown in the table below: Group Date Event/Time Frame Alta Loma Riding Club March 6th Board Meeting/'7:30p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club Mamh 16t~ Play Day/9:00a.m.-3:00p.m. 4-H Club March 17th General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club March 18t" General Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club April 3r~ Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p.m. Citizen's Patrol April 5t~ Training Day/8:00a.m.-5:00p.m. Rising Stars of April 12tn Easter Show/7:00a.m.-5:00p.m. Equestrian Therapy Alta Loma Riding Club April 15th General Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p.m 4-H Club April 21st General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:00p.m. Rising Stars of April 27tn Special Olympics/7:00a.m.-5:00p.m. Equestrian Therapy Facilities: · Lions West Community Center had over 6,000 people enter their doors during their 589 hours of operation in February. 4,600 people enter through Lion's East Community Center's doors during their 480 hours of operating time for the same timeframe. · Facilities - Staff is meeting quarterly with users of the equestrian center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next.meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will be on March 20th. At that meeting the following agenda items will be discussed/acted upon: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 · Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. · Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. · Update on the Central Park project. · Update on the Cultural Center project. · Review of proposed design for Victoria Arbors Park. · Guidelines for snack bar facilities at City parks. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed at the Community Foundation's March 11th, 2003 meeting: · Update on Cultural Center project. · Community Foundation Strategic Planning Session #6 --- Board Development, Fund Development Training and Development of a Fund Development Plan. · Discussion regarding plans for the 2003 Founder's Gala to be held November 1, 2003. · The Community Foundation and the Library Foundation have agreed to collaborate in their fundraising efforts for the Cultural Arts Center. They are working with a consultant for board development and fund development training. A joint workshop will be held at the Civic Center on Saturday, March 22, 2003. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · Staff is near completion of a 5-minute Epicenter marketinq video of the facility. This piece will provide potential users/renters of the facility with an up close look at all of the amenities that the facility has to offer. Copies of the video will be available in both CD and VHS format and will also be loading onto the Epicenter's website. · Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the Epicenter: · Christian Coalition - Day of Prayer- March 16, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Abundant Living Church - Easter Services - April 20, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium and Softball Field. · Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Bike Safety Clinic - May 3, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area. · Community Services Department - Silver Anniversary Celebration - May 10, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - High School All Stars Game - June 10, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Rancho Cucamonga High School - 2003 Graduation Ceremony - June 11, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Vons/Safeway - Celebrity/CEO Softball Tournament- September 27, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Grape Harvest Festival- October 2- 5, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 19, 2003 "-J'o e O'Neil ector City Engineer h[COMMSERt6Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffReportst2OO3tupdate3.19.03, doc T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Mayor and Membersof~ City Council FROM: Jack Lam, City Manaa~ BY: Pamela S. Easter, Depu~ City Manager SUBJECT: Ratifications of Assignments to City Council Subcommittees and Outside Organizations This memorandum provides a summary of discussion of Council assignments to Council subcommittees and outside organizations. The resulting list of subcommittees and organizations as well as Council member assignments is attached. Please note that the Cable Television Subcommittee has been renamed to Telecommunications Committee, with the area of responsibility broadened to include wireless communications, the Internet, fiber optics, etc. Staff recommends Council give final consideration to this assignment list and ratify it. Cc: Department Heads City of Rancho Cucamonga Recommended City Council Subcommittees and Appointments March 2003 City Council Subcommittees Thc following are committees on which two Council members serve to consider assigned areas of City programs/functions, provide feedback to staff and make recommendations to the full City Council on policy matters and Commission/Foundation appointments. These committees meet on an as needed basis throughout the year. Telecommunications Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Cable television franchises, wireless communications, fiber optics, Internet, and oversight to RECTO -3. Committee members: Howdyshell and Kurth Community Services Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Park and Recreation Commission and Community Foundation appointments, Quake Stadium usage, construction of park and recreation facilities, and programs. Committee members: Gutierrez and Kurth Cultural Arts Facility Ad Hoc Committee Area of responsibility: Design and construction related to the Cultural Arts Facility. Committee members: Howdyshell and Williams Fire District Personnel Committee Area of responsibility: Review employment eligibility lists prior to certification and other related personnel matters, in accordance with Fire Department Rules and Regulations. Committee members: Howdyshell and Kurth Housing Set Aside Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Reviews affordable housing needs and develops strategy and programs for Redevelopment Agency set-aside money. Committee members: Alexander and Kurth City Council Subcommittees Page two Library Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Library and Library Foundation programs and services as well as Library Board of Trustees and Library Foundation appointments. Committee members: Alexander and Howdyshell Gutierrez (Alternate) Planning/Historic Preservation Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Planning/Historic Preservation Commission appointments and Rails to Trails Plan implementation. Committee members: Alexander and Williams Public Safety Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Public Safety issues, including police, fire, and emergency preparedness programs and facilities, etc. Committee members: Gutierrez and Kurth Public Works Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Traffic and public works projects. Committee members: Howdyshell and Williams Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee Area of responsibility: Marketing of the City, review of Redevelopment Agency marketing budget, and Foothill Boulevard Task Force. Committee members: Gutierrez and Williams Mobile home Accord Review committee Area of responsibility: Provides liaison for the City's Mobile Home Accord. The Accord is a contract between the owners of the City's mobile home parks and the City, which addresses rent stabilization for the mobile home parks. Committee members: Kurth and Howdyshell Appointments to Community Organizations and Regional Agencies These appointments involve Council members representing the City to community organizations and regional agencies. Several of these have a designation of both a Delegate and an Alternate. City Selection Committee Area of Responsibility: The City Selection Committee is made up of all Mayors in San Bemardino County. Its purpose is to select elected representatives to various bodies that include: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and the Air Quality Management District. (AQMD). The regular meeting of the Committee is held on the last working day of April of every even numbered year at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bemardino in conjunction with SANBAG agenda businesses starting at 9:30 a.m. and as needed. Delegate: Alexander North Etiwanda Preserve Area of responsibility: Responsible for overseeing use and conservation of the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve. This committee includes representatives from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County Board of Supervisors, State Department ofFish and Game, U.S. Department ofFish and Wildlife as well as at-large representatives of adjacent property owners. Delegate: Alexander through mid-2003/Gutierrez mid - 2003 and after Omnitrans Area of responsibility: Omnitrans is a Joint Powers Agency that coordinates the public transit services of its member cities in San Bemardino County. Delegate: Alexander Alternate: Williams Route 210 Freeway Ad Hoc Task Force Area of responsibility: Provides public forum for discussions of items related to Route 210 Freeway. Delegates: Alexander and Williams Alternate: Kurth Appointments to Community Organizations and Regional Agencies Page two Route 210 Freeway Corridor Design Joint Powers Authority Area of responsibility: Addresses Route 210 Freeway items for San Bemardino and Los Angeles Counties Delegate: Williams Alternate: Kurth Chamber of Commerce Area of responsibility: Provides liaison between the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating projects and items of mutual interest. Delegate: Kurth Inland Empire Division, League of California Cities: Legislative Task Force Area of responsibility: The Legislative Task Force of the Inland Empire Division works to share information and support on cities' legislative interests. Delegate: Williams San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Area of Responsibility: The San Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is the regional transportation planning authority and Council of Governments for San Bemardino County. The City participates in SANBAG through a Joint Powers Agreement. Meets the first Wednesday of every month at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bemardino at 9:30 a.m. Delegate: Alexander (Current Vice Chair, assumes Chair in June 2003) Alternate: Williams The City's Delegate to the SANBAG Board of Directors may be appointed by the Board to also serve on intercounty agency boards, such as Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and Metrolink. In this role, Mayor Alexander serves as a SANBAG representative to the following agencies: Appointments to Community Organizations and Regional Agencies Page three · SCAG Regional Council: Metropolitan Planning Organization for six counties, including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bemardino, Riverside, Venture, and Imperial. SCAG is mandated by the federal government to research and develop plans for transportation, growth management, hazardous waste management, and air quality.) Mayor Alexander's SCAG committee assignments include the Executive Committee, Administration Committee, and Community, Economic and Human Development (CEHD) Committee. Mayor Alexander is currently serving as Chair of the CEHD Committee. · Metrolink Board of Directors: Metrolink Board is responsible for managing Southern Califomia's commuter rail system. Mayor Alexander is currently serving as Chair, for a two-year term. He also serves on the Executive Committee and Planning and Development Committee. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~[~ -' STAFF REPORT DATE: March 19, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra Adams, CMC, City Clerk/Records Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO IMPLEMENT THE UPDATED AGENDA FORMAT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached updated agenda format to be implemented beginning April 2, 2003. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In our efforts to update the agenda format and better assist the public, we have proposed various changes to the City Council Agenda for the CounciFs consideration. These changes are as follows: 1. Our agenda cover includes current City graphics 2. An Information Sheet has been added to the front of the agenda which will assist the public with guidelines for addressing the City Council, how to access the -complete agenda packet, broadcasting information, and Americans with Disabilities Act information 3. A Council Communications section has been added 4. The agenda format itself has been modified for easier reading These changes are also consistent with current agenda formats of most cities. The attached revised agenda format is being submitted to you for your approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, '~"~'~'Debra d. (/~I~ m s, C~CMC~ rldRe co rd s Manager (Attachments as noted) THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS [] City Council [] Redevelopment Agency [] Fire Protection District REGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesdays ~- 7:00 p.m. MARCH 19, 2003 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William d. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert d. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald d. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager dames L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debts d. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting .... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". Them is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3. Meetings are rebroadcast on the following Wednesday at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday Of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency And the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at: http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE 1 RANCHO (~UCAMONGA 1. Roll Call: Alexander ~, Gutierrez~, Howdyshell~, Ku~h~, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/P~SENTATIONS II 1. 2. C. PUBLIC COMMU~CATIONS II This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I This is fha tima and pla~a for repo~s to b~ maria by m~mb~rs of fha Gity council on mattars not on tha agenda. lh~ followinfl ~on~ont Calendar it*m* aro ~xp*eted to b~ routino and non-~ontrowr~ial, lh~ will b~ ~,t~d upon by th~ Council at OhO tim~ without di,~u~ion. ~n~ item may be r~mowd by a Goun~ilmomb~r or mombor of th~ audi~nco for di~u,~ion. 2. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE 2 RANCHO CU~AMONGA F. CONSENT ORDINANCES I The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. 2. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. 2. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. 2. I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I The following items do not leoally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. ]. 2. ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE 3 cR~C.O IJ~AMONGA IIJ. CouNciL BUSINESS II The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. 2. K. IDENTIFICATIONS OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. IIL. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 31, 2002, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.