Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/03/10 - Agenda Packet.~.o~.~ ][977 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY MARCH 10, 1993 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA III · IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea __ Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Vallette Announcements Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meeting of February 10, 1993 February 24, 1993 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. Ao TIME EXTENSION FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 10035 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK - A request for the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for Lots 1 through 21 of a previously approved tract consisting of 38 single family lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN: 207-631-01 through 11 and 207-641-01 through 10. Related file Variance 89-12. So Co Do TIME EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE 89-12 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK - A request to allow reduced front yard setbacks on 8 lots, a reduced minimum average front yard setback for all lots, height extensions above 35 feet on 3 lots, and a reduced accessory structure setback on Lot 2, for a previously approved tract map consisting of 38 single family lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN: 207-631-01 through 23 and 207-641-01 through 15. Related file Design Review for Tract 10035. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request for a 3-lot subdivision and design review of 115 condominium units on 10.27 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-201-44. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request for a residential subdivision and design review of 36 condominium units on 3.56 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street - APN: 1077-332-26. VI. New Business VII. VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-05 - K & K GOLFING - A request to construct a golf training facility, consisting of a driving range, putting green, chipping area, clubhouse, and maintenance building, within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-24. Public comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Commission Business TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES - A discussion of Public Safety Commission Resolution No. 93-001. G. DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - Oral report IX. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP _! -- :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ! H~ ~ I:::::::: :::::::::::::: ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::;: ;I · ======================================= I % I::::;:-::~, ' ~ E ~ . .,,~.~,:, ;,.... ,.,,,,,,..,,. ........,,,, ..., .............,, ..,,;,, ..........~ ..~,,~_ CiTY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 10, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Bullet, City Planner Steven Hayes, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 10035 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK - A request for the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for Lots 1 through 21 of a previously approved tract consisting of 38 single family lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN: 207-631-01 through 11 and 207-641-01 through 10. Related file: Variance 89-12. TIME EXT=NSION FOR VARIANCE 89-12 - PACIFIC FIP~T BANK - A request to allow reduced front yard setbacks on 8 lots, a reduced minimum average front yard setback for all lots, height extensions above 35 feet on 3 lots, and a reduced accessory structure setback on Lot 2, for a previously approved tract map consisting of 38 single family lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN: 207-631-01 through 23 and 207-641-01 through 15. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 10035 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1981. Since that time, the Planning Commission approved the site plans and building elevations for all the lots within this tract. Lots 36, 37, and 38 were approved by the Planning Commission ~n May 28, 1986, and the remaining 35 lots were approved by the Planning Comm4ssion on January 28, 1987. Subsequently, the property on the south side of Camino Predera (Lots I through 21) was sold and a new applicant received Design Review approval for a new site plan and building elevations on January 24, 1990. The proposed time extension would grant the current owner his second one-year extension to January 24, 1994. The Development Code Section 17.02.100 allows three possible time extensions in twelve-month increments not to exceed a total of five years from the original date of approval for all projects approved by the Planning Co~m%ission. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension request and has compared the proposal with the current development criteria as outlined in the Development Code. Of particular concern in staff's analysis is the issue of conformance with the current Hillside Development Standards. At the time this Design Review was approved, the City had not yet adopted its Hillside Regulations; hence, the project was not subject to specific technical requirements within the current Hillside Ordinance. However, the applicant made every .effort to design the residences to meet the purpose and intent of the ITEMS A & B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR DR FOR TRACT 10035 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK March 10, 1993 Page 2 Hillside Ordinance. Specifically, units were designed to use interior walls as retaining walls in order to minimize the grading necessary on each lot and "inverted plans" (i.e., living area on top floors and bedrooms below) were proposed to take further advantage of viewshed opportunities. Finally, garages were given a "floating" designation in order to minimize the obtrusiveness in the streetscape and to reduce the blockage of views to the valley floor below (refer to Exhibit "L"). In conjunction with the Design Review request, the applicant also obtained approval of a variance to allow reduced front yard setbacks on 8 of the 21 lots, an overall reduction of the required minimum average front setback for all lots, an extension above the required height limits on 3 lots, and a reduced accessory structure setback on 1 lot for the general purposes of reducing the apparent height of structures and opening viewsheds to the lower elevations (refer to Exhibit "K"). To summarize, staff has determined that the project still meets the basic standards for development in the Low Residential District and the general purposes and intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance. The Planning Co~ission concurred and granted a time extension one year ago. RECOmmENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve one-year Time Extensions for the Design Review for Lots 1 through 21 of Tract 10035 and Variance No. 89-12 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. City Planner BB:SH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit #F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Exhibit "L" Exhibit "M" Vicinity Map Site Plan Individual Lot Site Plans Conceptual Landscape Plan Site Features Map Slope Zone Analysis Floor Plans Detailed Typical Building Elevations Building Elevations Typical Sections General Variance Justifications General Tract Information Letter from Applicant Resolutions of Approval Nos. 90-15, 90-15A, and 90-16 Resolution of Approval for the DR for Tract 10035 Time Extension Resolution of Approval for VAR 89-12 Time Extension CITY OF rm. x t.. z~ ~,/~ Z~ /a~.a RANCI--K) CUCAMONGA wn ~:' ~c,,./,//,,,?- ,,,,r,~ I / / LOW~ ~ ENTRY LEVEL LOWER LEVEL A B ,l ? £NTRY I ~ LL ' I '~..-'u ENTRY LEVEL LOWE~ LEVEL ~ B '1' LOWER LEVEL EMT~Y ~ LOWER LEVEL .~ - BUILDING SECT[ON A ENTRY LEVEL LOWER LEVEL A BUlL~NG SECTION LOWER LEVEL B ENTRY LEVEL LOWER A ENTRY LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOVV'!~I ~ I · ENTRY LEVFJ_ 9 j.j ENTRY LEVEL AT ROW LOWEr:! LEVEL 134,91 T 2,~18 SQ. FT. I ~ ,,lO~ N(~ leo14 LOWER LEVEL 1520 .~~i.~-~7~ ,,',~.,-"~ ~L,._~I. ~ - .~ .- ~ " . JGI NO: 88014 EAST ~ KVAT!ON PLAN I (~) LOT 3 PLAN 2 LOT 1~ N~H ELEVATION J® SOUTH FI FVATION WEST ELEVATION PLAN 3 LOT 1 SOUTH ELEVATION · IL©'T 7i] PlLAI~ ¢ SECTION UNIT I .=. SEC'I1ON UNIT 2 SECTION UNIT 3 VARIANOE JUSTIFICATION The Arbors on Redhill is a very real attempt to design hillside adaptable housing utilizing standard plans plotted as though each lot were to receive a custom home. Indeed, much of the adaptive design features are taken from the vocabulary of custom homes and are rarely found i~ production housing. The attached project description and plane discuss and illustrate the extreme variety of site conditions found among the 21 lots. Most critical of all site features is the very steep drop in elevation in the 2S~ front setback experienced by half the lots. In these cases, a 50~ slope condition exists which makes it impossible to meet both setback and height restrictions. Our analysis indicate the following lots require variances in order to be properly developed. Lot 2: Reduce front setback to allow side entry garage. Lot 3: Permit exception to height limit. Allow l0~ front setback. Lots 4, 5, 6, 9, 14 & 15: Permit exception to height limit. Allow 5' front setback. Lo~e ? & 8: Allow 5' front setback. These lots are 10 of the 1! that exhibit the steep d~op off from the street. In addition, several of these lots have narrow frontage (Lots 2 through 7), which forces the house further back on the lot which exacerbates the height problem. Several of these lots (2, S and ~4) also exhibit severe cross slope conditions which also intensifies the height problems. Every effort has been made to adapt the architecture to the hillside on each of these lots. The minimum split from garage to entry level is the maximum is 9'. On Lot 2, a detached side entry garage has been employed to further reduce the street impact of garages and place the residence on the most appropriate port/on of the lot. Even when a 5~ setback is requested, the residence Is much further back and drops down the hill from 5' to 9~. The City Engineer has expressed support for the 5' setback as opposed to a 10' setback which is felt would encourage apron parking w~th the resulting blockage of the public sidewalk. Only on Lot 3 have we used a 10' setback. There the severe cross slope requires a minimum of 10~ to warp the driveway apron. At a 20~ setback, the floor of the garage would be 25' out of grade. The 10~ setback ~s necessary to alleviate the impacts of the cross slope and the extremely steep downslope (60~ in the setback area). EXHIBIT:"/f- "SCALE: Placing the garages and residences 25' back (or more with a 5' variation in setback) will result in either a much greater split from garage to entry which will make the homes unmarketmbls or they will rise such further out of grade at the rear with the resulting skirt walls becoming objectionable. SUMMARY The severity of the downhill slope conditions on the subject lots, combined with different lot geometries (frontages vary from 62' to 80' and cross slope conditions all create the required findings for th~ granting of a variance. None of the resulting plottings will be objectionable, none will create a nuisance and all will be compatible with both other lots in this development as well as with adjacent properties. Without the granting of the variances, these lots beome virtually undevelopable. TH~ ARBORS ON R~DHTLL PROJRCT DESCRIPT'rON THE SITE The site is a series of 21 lots of record zoned "L" (Low Residential District) with a minimum lot area of 7,200 s.f. and a maximum density of 4 du/ac. There are no corner lots, flag lots or other restricted access lot configurations. The 21 lots are all hillside lots in a downhill setting with extraordinary offsite view capture possibilities. The 21 lots are part of a larger 38 lot subdivision which has been partially developed by various other entities. The remaining 17 lots are all uphill lots on the north side of Camino Predera and are not a part of this development proposal. The site is a generally south facing slope of Redhi// stretching for 1,600' along the south side of Camino Predera. All 21 lots front Camino Predate and are contiguous to one another. Lot i is The highest and most westerly at elevation 1,365 with lot 21 being the lowest and most easterly at elevation 1,274. Perhaps the most noteworthy feature of the site is the extreme variation in individual lot characteristics. In order to ~ully understand the planning and design parameters inherent in the diversity of lot characteristics we conducted several overall as well a~ Individual site analyses. The results are summarized below: Individual sites vary in frontage width from a minimum of 62' to a maximum of 109' 10 lots are approximately 80' wide and another 6 are approximately 65' wide. E/even lots drop 12' or more within the first 25' (which Is also the approximate front setback line). This represents a 50~ slope condition on half The lots. 13 lots have more than 70~ of their site area in slopes 20~ or greater. Two more lots meet this criteria if shallow areas near the /owest part of the lot are discounted due to inaccessibility from The street. D. Lots 1, 2, 3, 13 end 14 also exhibit moderate to severe cross slope conditions ranging from 9~ to 26~. Four lots (10, 11, 12 and 13) are impacted by a knoll that was left intact during the tract grading process which rises as much as 9' above curb grade just inside The front property line of The subject lots. Access to each lot will always be located on The lower side of the knoll but some grading is inevitable. To the extent possible, the shape of The knoll will be left intact or ragreded To appear natural. CITY OF'i: '-I~:' ':N" ~/'~?""~-4C"~CAM O a GA PL '.':~( 'NIHG" 'D ":: '~ION EXHIB rr:"L - / SCALE: The site in general en~o¥s extraordinary view capture potential, particularly from the upper portion of each lot. The lower one drops on the lots, the closer one gets to adverse conditions presented by the adjacent service road and railroad. Additionally, adjacent and on-site trees block view capture on the lower portion of some lots. SUMMARY The 2! lots exhibit extreme diversity in their combination of specific attributes in these categories: (1) Lot frontage Cross slope (3) Extremely steep setbacks (4) Lot area devoted to 20~ or greater slopes Land form diversity (knolls, cross slope. undulations, plateaus) The result is the necessity to view each lot as a distinct site and locate the home accordingly, i.e., each lot ~s custom designed to receive the house designed for it. THE PRODUCT Early in the design process several critical decisions were made based upon the site analysis and marketing criteria. First, three plans were determined to meet both market demand and site conditions. Second, the unit plans were each specified as "inverted plans" with living areas on the upper level and bedrooms below. This provides easiest access from the garage to living levels, assures generous volume ceilings in living areas and maximizes view capture opportunities. Third, garage to living level elevation changes were to be designed to accommodate a variety of topographic conditions and not to exceed 8'. Plan ! has a 6.5! split from garage down to the entry. Plan 2 has · detached garage which can "f/oat" with tops changes. Plan 3 has an attached garage that has seven split conditions from 1.5' to 9'. In addition to providing for topographically adaptable designs, garages have been turned 90 degrees to the street where possible which provides minimum visual impact, adds apron parking area and creates architectural variety. Plotting has taken place to respect the topography by canting the dwelling with respect to the street and placing it parallel to the natural contours. CITY O F"~ ~'~ .'~"'O.:..:11C~CAMO N G A PL'.:~:NI NG'D"i-~ION EXHIBIT: [_-2" SCALE: On a number of lots the topography is so steep that front setbacks were reduced to 5f to keep the garage and dwelling as close to natural grade as possible, There are conditions where the dwelling sits at grade on the uphill side and is several feet out of grade at the rear or downhill side. Variances are required for this reduction in front setbacks and requests for such accompany this application. Lot 3 exhibits such a severe combination of cross slope and very steep downslope conditions that a 10' setback has been utilized. Height limits are also challenged by the steepest lots where even with a 5~ setback the garage cannot be constructed without violating the 35' limit. For these lots a variance is also requested. UNIT DESIGNS The three unit plane are all designed for the move-up market of mature families who can make use of well zoned interior space, ample private outdoor living area, oversized two and three car garages, formal living and dining rooms complemented by large kitchens with nooks end family rooms. Virtually every living area of each home, Including bedrooms are vlew oriented, a design criteria which resulted in wide, shallow footprints that stretch across each lot parallel with the natural contours. PLAN ! (plotted on 4 lots) $ bedroom, 2 1/2 bath, formal living/dining, /e/and kitchen, nook and family room. 2,548 s.f. living area, 759 s.f. decks (additional patio areas provided as site conditions allow), attached garage (6 1/2~ downhill split}. PLAN 2 [plotted on 8 lots) 3 bedroom, bedroom 4/retreat, 3 1/2 bath, sunken living, raised dining, island kitchen, nook and family room. 2,891 e.f. living area, ?52 s.f. decks, (mdditional decks/patios as site conditions allow), detached ga=age. PLAN 3 (plotted on 9 lots) 4 bedroom, 3 1/2 bath, formal den, raised dining, formal living room, island kitchen, nook and family, 3,169 s.f. living area, 715 $.f. decks and screen porch, front court at ante/den, attached garage [splits from ! 1/2e to 9~). 9449 Balboa Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92123 (619) 492-9000 Ianuary 22, 1993 RECEIVE FEB 0 4 I~13 City o_f RanCho Cucamon Planning DivisiO~ Mr. Steve Hayes Engineering-Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Design Review, Tract 10035, Lots 1 - 21 Dear Steve: As discussed, enclosed herewith is a check in the amount of $549.00, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This letter with check should be considered our request to extend Design Review approval of the subject lots to Jamtory 24, 1994. Once the extension process is complete, please send me a copy of the executed agreement. Thank you for your assistance and should you have any questions, please call me at (619) 492-9000. Yours truly, Ed W'flliams Vice'President cc: Gary Gillinger Jim Clegem Memker FDIC EQUAL OPPORTUNITY LENDER RESOLUTION NO. 90-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR TRACT NO. 10035, LOTS I THROUGH 21, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 38 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207-631-01 through 11 and 207-641-01 through 10 A. Recital s. (i) CALPROP CORPORATION has filed an application for the approval of the Design Review of lots 1-21 of Tract No. 10035 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On January 24, 1990, the Planning Cmm~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (tii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of th& facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 24, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Conmission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COI~4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-15 TR 10035 DR - CALPROP January 24, 1990 Page 2 Planning Division: 1) 2) 3) Return walls and combination retaining/block walls shall be designed in such a way as not to be an obtrusive element in the overall conceptual architectural and landscape design of the project. All garage elevations facing streets shall be upgraded to include architectural detail that is consistent with the high level of architectural detail presented on the proposed residences. The deck underlay for the driveway on Lot 2 shall incorporate exterior elements provided on the Lot 2 residence. 4) 5) 6) All pertinent conditions from the previous tract approval contained in Resolution No. 81-34 shall apply. All pertinent conditions from the two previous design review approvals, within Resolution Nos. 86-76 and 87-11 shall apply. Approval of this Design Review is contingent upon approval of the related Variance No. 89-12. 7) 8) A revised color board, which incorporates more muted color samples for the accent features (i.e., chimney caps, guardrails) shall be reviewed by the City Planner. Landscaping shall be planted as to soften the appearance of all retaining walls and escarpments and reduce the steep appearance of the slope as seen from Foothill Boulevard. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Design Review Conmittee on a consent calendar basis prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: 1) It appears (by scaling) that part of the structure on lot 21 encroaches onto the City storm drain easement. The encroaching portion of the structure shall be removed from the easement or a request to vacate a portion of the easement shall be filed and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2) All driveways shall be a maximum of 24 feet wide per City Standard No. 305. 3) Those driveways subject to potential drainage overflow shall have a street overflow deflector curb confomtng to City Standard No. 316 as determined in the plan check process. PLANNING CO!¢qISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-15 TR 10035 DR - CALPROP January 24, 1990 Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PL.~NNING C~SION OFTHE CITY O~ RANCHOCUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Co~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamoega, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COI¢qISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COIIqISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COI¢4ISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 90-15A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCU~, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR TP~ACT NO. 10035, LOTS 1 THROUGH 21, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 38 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-631-01 THROUGH 11 AND 207-641-01 THROUGH 10 A. Recitals. {i) On January 24, lg90, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-15, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, the Design Review of Lots 1-21 of Tract No. 10035 as described in the title of this resolution. (ii) On September 13, 19g0 a request was filed by Warkentin Wraight for Calprop to modify the condition of approval requiring that driveways not exceed 24 feet in width. (iii) On December 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the .Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing on December 12, lggO, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That it is necessary to exceed 24 feet for the width of the driveways on some of the lots due to the steep terrain of the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-15A TR 10035 - CALPROP DECEMBER 12, 1990 PAGE 2 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies Resolution No. 90-15 by adding Planning Division Condition No. (9) and changing Engineering Division Condition No. (2) to read as follows: Planninq Division (9) For all driveways that exceed 24 feet in width, decorative paving materials (i.e., colored textured concrete, brick banding) shall be utilized to break up large expanses of concrete, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Enqineerinq Division (2) The width of all driveways shall be the minimum necessary to provide convenient access to the garages as approved by the City Planner and City Engineer. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMJ~I~SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ / Larr~iel, Chairman t ATTEST: ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-15A TR 10035 - CALPROP DECEMBER 12, 1990 PAGE 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon§a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannin9 Commission held on the 12th day of December 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL. MELCHER. T()LSTOY. VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 90-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 89-12, A REQUEST TO ALLOW REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACKS ON 8 LOTS, A REDUCED MINIMUM AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR ALL LOTS, HEIGHT EXTENSIONS ABOVE 35 FEET ON 3 LOTS, AND A REDUCED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK ON LOT 2, FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 38 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207-631-01 through 23 and 207-641-01 through 15. A. Recitals. (i) CALPROP CORPORATION has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 89-12 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application". {ii) On January 24, 19g0, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 24, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: {a) The application applies to property located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon with a street frontage of 1585.91 feet and lot depths ranging from 117.51 feet to 305.84 feet and is presently improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant commercial land; the property to the east is a railroad and vacant; and the property to the west is multi-family residential; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-16 VA 89-12 - CALPROP January 24, 1990 Page 2 (c) Reduced front yard setbacks aesthetically pleasing atmosphere than extended elevation of houses, facing Foothill Boulevard; and would provide a more stem walls on the rear (d) Due to the excessive slope on the front portion of many lots, driveway construction with a slope of more than twenty (20) percent for extended distances would exist if the houses were constructed at or behind the required front property lines; and (e) The property has the following unusual topographic characteristics: (1) Eleven lots drop 12 feet or more within the first 25 feet {which is also the approximate front setback line) which represents a 50 percent slope gradient; and (2) Thirteen lots have more than 70 percent of their site area in slopes with a 20 percent or steeper gradient; and (3) Five of the lots exhibit cross slope conditions ranging from g percent to 25 percent. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant for special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-16 VA 89-12 - CALPROP January 24, 1990 Page 3 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLANNING CO. SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission ,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW OF TRACT NO. 10035, LOTS 1 THROUGH 21, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 38 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-631-01 THROUGH 11 AND 207-641-01 THROUGH 10. A. Recitals (i) Pacific First Bank has filed an application for the extension of the Design Review for Lots i through 21 of Tract No. 10035 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 24, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-15, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, the Design Review of Lots 1 through 21 of Tract No. 10035. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TE FOR DR FOR TRACT 10035 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK March 10, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract Design Review for Tract 10035 (Lots 1-21) ADDlicant Expiration Pacific First Bank January 24, 1994 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE NO. 89-12, ALLOWING REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACKS ON 8 LOTS, A REDUCED MINIMUM AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR ALL LOTS, HEIGHT EXTENSIONS ABOVE 35 FEET ON 3 LOTS, AND A REDUCED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK ON LOT 2, FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 38 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-631-01 THROUGH 23 AND 207-641-01 THROUGH 15. A. Recitals (i) Pacific First Bank has filed an application for the extension of Variance No. 89-12 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 24, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-16, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Variance No. 89-12. (iii) On January 23, 1993, the applicant filed a request for a 12- month time extension. (iv) On March 10, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved variance is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan and Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TE FOR VAR 89-12 - PACIFIC FIRST BANK March 10, 1993 Page 2 b. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. c. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. d. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Variance ADDlicant Expiration 89-12 Pacific First Bank January 24, 1994 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 10, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Bullet, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE T~ACT 14055 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request for a 3-lot subdivision and design review of 115 condominium units on 10.27 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling ~nits per acre), located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-201-44. BACF~ROUND: Tract 14055 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 1989. A one-year time extension was granted extending the map and related Design Review to February 8, 1992. An additional one-year time extension was approved by the Planning Comm4ssion on January 22, 1992, extending the Tract and Design Review approval to February 8, 1993. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time extension to expire on February 8, 1994. Provisions of the Development Code allow for time extensions in twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. This would be the final time extension permitted. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets basic development standards of the Medium Residential District. The provisions of Ordinance No. 465, the new Multi-Family Development Standards, do not apply to time extension requests. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Development Code, or the character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming; and The granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements within the vicinity. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR TT 14055 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC March 10, 1993 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the time extension request for Tentative Tract 14055 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB:BN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Resolution No. 89-26 Exhibit "G" - Resolution No. 89-26A Exhibit "H" - Resolution No. 89-27 Resolution of Approval January 7, 1993 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Tentative Tract 14055 Dear Brad: VIA FACSIMILE 987-6499 We are requesting a one year time extension to the tentative map on tract number 14055 located on the north side of Arrow Route east of Baker Avenue. With the current economic climate as it is, obtaining a construction loan is virtually impossible. The funding sources which are available are at rates which make the project infeasible at this time. I am enclosing a check for $549.00 for the time extension application fee. I would appreciate your assistance in this matter, and look forward to our next contact. Sincerely, Diversified Pacific Development Corporation Jeffrey, ~. ~-"'"""~ Burum Vice President JSB:maj 190 N. Arrowhead Ave., Suite E · Rialto, CA 92376 · Tel. (714! 873-1492 · FAX (714) 873-9661 rid II Illllll I Ill I1111 l tl i111 Ill IIIII Ill II I Ill I IIII Ill II jill Ill I1'1 I1' '111 IIIII I IIIr II1'11 II lull II III HIll III IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIII 111111 IIIII PLAN ;NTN"~~ D'/I~SION TITLE: ~01L,~IIdA !~.~,~/. EXHIBIT: ~'1 SCALE: ~.. ~. :~..~,.. ~ .-, ITEM:'rT 14o~J.~' 't'lMF- ~"r'. C~ OF '~CH."~:.':~UC~ONGA ' :~":;Y":':~"::;':"~ ~ a~:~-~ SCALE: .. L:~ . . .... Ill l ql Illll I II Ii 111 II ii ii a'i il'ii ii8 ii ifil [ii ill It l ill till t IlllOffr TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 4 crrY ExI4mIT: ~-~- SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 89-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COI~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14055, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 115 TOWNHOUSE UNITS ON 10.27 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207-201-32 AND 12 A. Recitals. (i) Avaness Industries has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14055 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 8th of February, 1989, the ~anntng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resol uti on. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This C~isston hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 8, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) l~e application applies to property located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue with a street frontage of 132 feet along Arrow Highway and 198 feet along Baker Avenue and is presently vacant, except for two unimproved dirt roads; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is in the Low-Medium Residential District and is developed with a mobile home park, the property to the south of that site consists of older single family residences in the Medium Residential District, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is Baker Avenue, with single family residences beyond in the Medium Density Residential District. PLANNING COI~ISISON RESOLUTION NO. 89-26 TT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Conmission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific pl aris; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the. proposed subdivision. 4. This Conmission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Conmission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the.attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Tentative Tract 14055 Some type of interim access between the mobile home park to the northeast and Arrow Highway and/or Baker Avenue shall be provided at all times during grading and construction of the project. Prior to occupancy, automatic sliding gates shall be installed at the two access points into the mobile home park and gate keys, cards or some other appropriate device shall be issued to residents of the mobile home park only. Access shall be restricted for residents of the proposed project through the PLANNING COt~ISISON RESOLUTION NO. 89-26 TT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 3 mobile home park. The CC&Rs of the townhouse project shall require the consistent maintenance of the gates. Any necessary repairs shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association and shall be so noted in the CC&Rs. All operational costs shall be borne by the Homeowners' Association of the townhouse project and shall be so noted in the CC&Rs. Any walls within the proposed project which are to be greater than 6 feet in height, but 8 feet in height or less, shall require a Minor Exception prior to issuance of permits. Grading, construction, and the servicing and maintenance of construction equipment shall not occur on Saturdays or Sundays and shall not occur between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays. Any unresolved property line conflicts shall be resolved prior to issuance of building permits. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecmunication and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. The following reimbursements shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Map. Arrow Route - For the construction of all street improvements along the property frontage, including the cost for undergrounding the overhead utilities; and b. Baker Avenue - For the construction of all street improvements along the property frontage. Access shall be provided through this project in favor of the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northeast to the satisfaction of the mobile home park owner. It is not the intent that this be reciprocal access to allow traffic flow from this tract to or through the project to the north. The access shall be resolved and the existing blanket easement quit claimed prior to the issuance of any permits or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first. The access as shown on the Tentative Map is acceptable to the City. In order to maintain two means of access for the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northwest, an additional driveway or emergency only access shall be provided onto Baker Avenue within the mobile home park frontage. This condition shall be waived if the access is not agreeable to the mobile home park owners. PLANNING COI~4ISISON RESOLUTION NO. 89-26 TT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 4 e The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the access easements granted by the tract map to the residents of the mobile home park to the northeast. The terms of this easement shall be noted in the ¢C&Rs of the Homeowners' Association of the townhouse project. 10. Site directory (monument) sign(s) shall be provided prior to occupancy at each vehicular entrance to the project in conformance with the Sign Ordinance. 11. Permanent dust control measures shall be required and shall include, bot not be limited to, the provision of sprinklers, soil binders, and cover crops. The above noted provisions shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989. PLANNING CO ~fISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST a 1 e~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cam~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES.' COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CO~NISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14055, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 115 UNITS ON 10.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN= 207-201-32 AND 12. A. Recitals. (i) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 89-26, approving Tentative Tract 14055, a one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes, consisting of 115 units. (ii} On September 13, 1990, a modification request was filed by Modern Corporation to change the map from a one-lot subdivision to a three-lot subdivision for financing purposes. (iii) On December 12, 1990, and continued to February 13, March 13, and March 27, 1991, the Plan~ing C~tssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on March 27, 1991. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adol~cion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc~onga ae followsc 1. This Co~miasion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as (a) The application applies to property located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue with a street frontage of 132 feet along Arrow Highway and 198 feet along Baker Avenue and is presently vacant, except for two unimproved dirt roads~ and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is in the Low-Medium Residential District and is developed with a mobile home park, the proper~y to the south of the site consists of older single family residences in the Medium Residential District, the property to the east is vacant with a designation of Medium Residential, and the property to the west is Baker Avenue, with single family residences beyond in the Medium Residential District. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A TT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code~ and (b) The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract are consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code~ and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed~ and (d) The design of the subdivision is not. likely to cause substantial envirorunental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat~ and (e) The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problmms~ and (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the p~oject has been reviewed and considered in cmapliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, that a Negative Declaration was issued on February 9, 1989. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Co..-..Lssion hereby modifies the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Division 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Resolution No. 89-26 shall apply, except as may bemodified herein. 2) Each phase shall maintain two points of access. The loop driveway shall be completely constructed with Phase 2. Construction shall be in accordance with the phasing plan. In particular, the main (westerly} recreation area and pool shall be constructed with Phase I. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A TT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 3 4) Automatic sliding gates shall be installed at the two access points into the mobile home park and gate keys, cards, or some other appropriate device shall be issued to the residents of the Mobile Home Park on1¥. This shall be completed with Phase I. 5) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever co. es first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello- Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the construction end maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a co~mun£ty Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has no~ formed a Mello-Roos Coe~unity Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Further, should the District and the developer reach an agreement prior to recordation of the map, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Installation of landscaping and irrigation in the parkway along Arrow (between sidewalk and curb) shall be completed with Phase I. Enaineerino 1) A reciprocal easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to recordation of the Final Map in favor of the properties to the west on Arrow Route. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-26A TT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION March 27, 1991 Page 4 If the project is constructed in phases, the first phase shall construct: a) the drive aisle connecting from Baker Avenue to Arrow Route to provide two means of access~ b) the drive aisle connecting to the two access points into the mobile home park~ and c) the automatic sliding gates for the two access points into the mobile home park. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTBD THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING CO~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Co~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Convission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENTs COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 89-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO~ISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14055 LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207-201-32 AND 12 A. Recitals. (i) Avaness Industries has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14055 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On February 8, 1989, the ~anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) have occurred. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comtsston hereby specifically finds that all qf the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Comnission during the above-referenced meeting on February 8, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Coalssion hereby specifically finds as follows:. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 2 89-27 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Baker Avenue and Arrow Highway frontages and the side elevation of the unit at the Baker Avenue entry shall be upgraded to be consistent with the level of detail provided on all front elevations. Upgrading shall include multi-paned windows, fascia trim, etc. The Arrow Highway entry shall be significantly upgraded with some type of decorative treatment similar to that provided at the Baker Avenue entry. Some type of low planter wall may be incorporated. The wall along the Baker Avenue frontage shall not be six feet in height, but three feet instead. Wrought iron, up to three feet in height, may be used on top, if desired for security purposes. The wall shall be stucco, painted to match the exterior of the existing units and shall be upgraded with a decorative cap and/or some type of tile detail. 4. The second sidewalk along Baker Avenue, within the interior of the project, shall be deleted. Additional trees shall be provided along the Arrow Highway frontage. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANO AOOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989. PLANNING CO/~ISSION OF THE CII'Y~ OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST :~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES February 8, 1989 Page 3 89-27 I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the ~anntng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COfftISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14055, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, A 3-LOT SUBDIVISION OF 115 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 10.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-201-44. A. Recitals (i) Diversified Pacific has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 14055 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as 'the application." (ii) On February 8, 1989, this Commission adopted its Resolutions No. 89-26 and 89-27, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14055 and Design Review for Tentative Tract 14055. (iii) On March 27, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 89-26A, thereby modifying certain conditions of approval for Tentative Tract No. 14055. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts met forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent Development Code. approval of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TE FOR TT 14055 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC March 10, 1993 Page 2 d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract TT 14055 Design Review for TT 14055 ADDlicant Diversified Pacific Diversified Pacific Expiration February 8, 1994 February 8, 1994 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TM DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST= Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, st a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth day of March 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 10, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request for a residential subdivision and design review of 36 condominium units on 3.56 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling ~units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street - APN: 1077-332-26. BACKGROUND: Tract 14875 was approved by the Planning Comission on January 9, 1991, with a two year time limit. The applicant is currently requesting a one year time extension to expire on January 9, 1994. Provisions of the Development Code allow for time extensions in twelve month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. The applicant may request two additional time extensions to extend the map until January 9, 1996. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets the basic development standards of the Medium Residential District. The provisions of Ordinance No. 465, the new multi-family Development Standards, do not apply to time extension requests. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Development Code, or the character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming; and The granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14875 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC March 10, 1993 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension request for Tentative Tract 14875 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB:BN:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "H" - Master Plan Exhibit "I" - Resolution 91-03 Exhibit "J" - Resolution 91-04 Resolution of Approval January 7, 1993 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 VIA FACSIMIL~ 98%6499 RE: Tentative Tract 14875 Dear Brad: We are requesting a one year time extension to the tentative map on tract number 14875 located at the southeast comer of Church and Archi'bald Avenues. With the current economic climate as it is, obtaining a construction loan is virtually impossible. The funding sources which are available are at rates which make the project infeasible at this time. I am enclosing a check for $549.00 for the time extension application fee. I would appreciate your assistance in this matter, and look forward to our next contact. Sincerely, Diversified Pacific Development Corporation Jeflrey S. Bu~' Vice President JSB:maj 190 N. Arrowhead Ave., Suite E · Rialto, CA 92376 · Tel. (714t 873-1492 · FAX (714~ 873-9~061 ~0 oO ~© ~© r~o RESOLUTION NO. 91-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14875, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 36 TOWN HOME UNITS ON 3.56 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, A PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT {8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-332-26. A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi Dalmau Architects has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14875 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the gth of January 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street with an Archibald Avenue street frontage of 250 feet and a Church Street frontage of 613 feet; (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site contains single family homes, the. property to the east contains a single family home and condominium units, the property to the south contains apartments; and {c) The project, with recommended conditions of approval, tomplies witq all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho ucamonga; ano PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-03 TENTA?IVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 2 (d) The application contemplates the development of a 36 unit condominium complex, proposing a density of 10.11 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the proposed Medium Residential land use designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: {a) The tentative tract will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division: (1) Approval is granted contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 90-01B and Development District Amendment 90-02, a change in density from Office/Professional to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-03 TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January g, 1991 Page 3 (2) (3) (4) (6) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establ i s hment of a Mel 1 o-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. If the developer and all affected school districts reach a private agreement, this condition shall be deemed null and void. A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels within the residences below 45 CNEL. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. A sound barrier as required by the acoustical analysis, shall be installed adjacent to the units fronting Archibald Avenue. The final design of the barrier shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Landscaping along the east side of Archibald Avenue shall conform to the Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions shall require regular cleaning of the clear sound attenuation barrier. The Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-03 TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 4 (7) Chapter 1706 of the State Statutes of lggO requires the payment of a fee of $1,250 or $1,275 for every Negative Declaration and $850 or $875 for every Environmental Impact Report, unless otherwise exempted. These funds are payable to the County Clerk or State Office of Planning and Research, and are ultimately forwarded on to the State Department of Fish and Game. The fee shall be payable by the applicant directly thereto; and this application shall not be operative or vested, nor will building permits be issued or the map recorded until the applicant furnishes proof to the City that the fee has been paid. Enqineering Division: {1) An i n- 1 i eu fee as cont ri buti on to future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities {telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map of issuance or building permits, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the portion of project frontage from the project's easterly boundary to the terminus pole on the east side of Archibald Avenue. (2) (3) Landscaping within "Limited Use Areas" for all project driveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. The following drainage improvements shall be constructed per the project's drainage report or as otherwise required by the City Engineer as justified by a final drainage report: A catch basin shall be constructed on the south side of Stafford Way adjacent to the existing detention basin. Also, a connector pipe shall be installed between the catch basin and the outlet structure. be The existing inlet/outlet structure located in the detention basin shall be removed and upgraded. A 6-inch high concrete curb shall be constructed on the easterly right-of-way line of Archibald Avenue. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-03 TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January g, lggl Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS gTH DAY OF JANUARY lggl. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTiEST: d B~ry I,/Srad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the gth day of January 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: CORMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA RESOLUTION NO. 91-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14875, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 36 TOWN HOME UNITS ON 3.56 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, A PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-332-26. A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi Oalmau Architects has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14875 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January g, lggl, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this CommissiOn during the above-referenced meeting on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design will be in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-04 TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 2 3. Based 1 and 2 above, this and every condition attached hereto and upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs Commission hereby approves the application subject to each set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, incorporated herein by this reference. (1) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 14875 shall apply. (2) Landscape and Irrigation Plan identifying all proposed landscape improvements shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (3) Interlocking pavers shall be used at the entry way and pedestrian connections. Material samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (4) Design of the perimeter walls, retaining walls, and sound attenuation barriers shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS gTH DAY OF JANUARY 1991. PLANNING2MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: _ , ~Larr. McN~ ATTE/~~ I, ~rad Bull e'r, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the gth day of January lggl, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14875 AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 36 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 3.56 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-332-26. A. Recitals (i) Diversified Pacific has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 14875 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 9, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution Nos. 91-03 and 91-04 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14875 and Design Review for Tentative Tract 14875. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14875 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC March 10, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract ADDlicant Expiration TT 14875 Diversified Pacific January 9, 1994 Design Review for Diversified Pacific January 9, 1994 TT 14875 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY .' Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth day of March 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS= ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 10, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-05 - K & K GOLFING - A request to construct a golf training facility, consisting of a driving range, putting green, chipping area, clubhouse, and maintenance building, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-24. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Detention Basin; Terra Vista Planned Community South - East - West - (Hospital and Related Facilities) Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial) Sports Complex and Animal Shelter; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Commercial South - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with two detention facilities in the southern portion to handle the water entering the site from the north. The southeast detention facility consists of a large earthen berm and concrete spillway adjacent to Arrow Route. This is the location proposed for the golf facility. A smaller detention facility is located to the west. The balance of the site is vacant. ITEM E pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations: Type Square of Use Footage Driving Range Retail 2,000 Number of Parking Spaces Ratio Required 1 space 100 per tee 1 space/ 8 250 sq. ft. Number of Spaces Provided 100 9 TOTAL 108 109 ANALYSIS: ae General: The applicant is proposing to develop a golf training facility on a small portion (25 acres) of the larger 146-acre paFcel bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north and Arrow Route on the south. The applicant is proposing to provide 100 tee areas from which to hit. A putting green is proposed for the southwest portion of the site. A chipping area is proposed for the southeast portion to practice sand shots. A 2,000 square foot clubhouse will contain a pro shop and a small kitchen/eating area. A separate 900 square foot building will house the maintenance equipment. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Vallette, Coleman) reviewed the plans and recommended revisions be provided to address the following concerns: The clubhouse design was not acceptable. The applicant should work with staff to explore alternatives to address the following items. The revised plans should be resubmitted for additional Committee review. a. A roof should be provided. Variation should be provided in the building planes. A possible solution could be attaching the maintenance building to the clubhouse. c. Elements/details consistent with the animal shelter should be considered. d. Combining the maintenance building with the clubhouse. The height of the fencing along the east property line should be re-evaluated to assure that stray golf balls do not enter the adjacent Sports Complex. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 3 De 3. The applicant should provide netting material color samples for review. 4e The poles and netting along the east property line should be located to avoid conflict with the trees on the adjacent property. Because of the applicant's concerns about off-site improvements, the Committee agreed to schedule the item for Planning Co~ission consideration. The applicant indicated a willingness to revise the project design. If the design issues are not resolved prior to the Commission meeting, a condition of approval will be placed on the project requiring the design issues to be resolved prior to the issuance of building permits. Technical Review Committee: On February 17, 1993, the Technical Review Committee considered the application and provided the applicant with a list of recommended conditions of approval. Among these conditions are the requirements for street improvements including the following: Arrow Route - The widening across the entire frontage of the legal parcel (roughly 2,560 feet) and storm drain installation from the east property line to Milliken Avenue. 2e Foothill Boulevard - The widening across the entire frontage of the legal parcel (roughly 2,170 feet) and the installation of the landscaped median from Orchard Street to the next median opening to the east. 3. Milliken Avenue - Construction of the street, full width, and related storm drain improvements. While these requirements may seem extensive considering the size of the area and frontage being developed, they are consistent with City ordinances and policies. The Municipal Code requires the installation of improvements along all street frontages of a parcel on which development is proposed. Therefore, these improvements are required even though the golf facility is only occupying a portion of the larger legal parcel. In reviewing the Municipal Code section, staff believes that relief from this condition can only be granted by the City Council. Therefore, the applicant would have to appeal any decision of the Planning Co~nission. Staff recommends, however, that the Planning Commission discuss the issue and, if appropriate, provide a reco~nendation to the City Council. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Initial Study and determined that the project will not result in any adverse environmental impacts. If the Planning Con~nission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recom~ends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 93-05 through adoption of the attached Resolution and issue a Negative Declaration. BB:SM/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plans Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhitit "E" - Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval [~l--W 0 0 0 - 00~,~ - (~~ 0 , D ~'~ ' Project: x',x' x~ ~.- CITY OF AMONGA Title: ~-"' ,.- '~..~- ~-,. P~ r,~ON Exhibit: ~'-/ Date: :L__j".'r oo :~..-? .. · ::.-..~'~...~..~ CITY OF R ..AI~,~ .~'.~UCAMONGA Project: Title: ,"?>~"/ ....,'"-' Exhibit: ~-'/ Date: Project: /?'~"~' "- Exhibit: ~'~ ~-Date: HISTORY OF PROJECT Rancho Valley Golf Center was initiated to fill a void in the recreational golf facilities now available to the residents of Rancho Cucaminga and surrounding communities. The principals conducted a personal survey of more than !00 friends and associates who reside in Rancho Cucamon§a to determine the support for the a project. The results were unamiously in favor of such a project. The search for an appropriate site was very time consuming, as most land owners/developere were not interested in land leases for long periods of time. The Cattelus group, after much discussion finally offered a site on 4th street in the city of Ontario. The principals convinced the Cattelus group that their site adjacent to the new baseball stadium would be better suited for this project. Now the site in Rancho Cucamonga next to the new stadium is the location for the new Golf Learning Center. -- RECEIVED ._ OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION MAR 03 lgg3 THE PRINCIPALS BILL KAUFMAN -Resident of Rancho Cucamonga for seven years. Married with an eleven year old girl and twin boys 8 years old. Owns a business located in Rancho Cucamonga employing 60 people. Coachs two coccer teams and one Little League team yearly. Sponsor at least five youth sports teams annually. Support Rancho Cucamonga schools with sizeable paper donations. President of Oeeccreek Homeowners Assoc. HAROLD KNELLER- Resident of Rancho Cucamonga for fifteen yeare. Married with one grown child. Has coached Little League teams. Sponsors at !east three youth sports teams annually. Board of Directors of Deercreek Homeowners Assoc. BENEFITS TO THE CITY & COMMUNITY A. The city will be the home of a 25 acre recreational facility for the whole community to enjoy. For ages 5 to 100 both male and female. B. The facility will supply jobs for approx. I I people. C. There will be up to $1.2mm in yearly revenue as a tax base for the city. D. The project will provide a beauitful backdrop to the visitore of the new baseball stadium. E. As part of the project the holding basin and dam on Arrow Hwy. which is always covered with graffiti will be removed and replaced with trees and schrubs. F. Rancho Valley Golf Center will provide to the various local sports and charitable groups a means to raise revenue for their needs. G. The presence of a facility that will be open up to 16 houre daily with lights will hopefully help to reduce the defacing of property, such as the new wails surrounding the Baseball stadium that are now coverod with graffiti. HELP WE ARE REQUESTING FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA This project is being funded with the principals personal savings as well as loans that the principals have secured. The lease that we have agreed upon only garantees us five years in this site, with a possible extension for another five years. We are fully prepared to improve the areas that are directly associated with the project, but we are not financially able to budget for improvements to the entire parcel owned by Cattelus 6roup. It was a very difficult job to convince the Cattelus Group to enter into the agreement for the Rancho Cucamonga land as it does not yield them much revenue versus the value of the land. They have made it very clear to us that it will not be possible for the upper management of Cattelus to agree to spend funds on our project to improve the entire site. They have agreed to incur the expense of hooking up to the storm drain if we fill in the retention basin, and that is all they will do. Our project covers only 14~ of the total paroel with g5% of that being a grass and water range. Our project is contemplating a maximum of 3000 ft of building and one acre of parking. We feel that all of the improvements that we are required to make will be torn up after our lease expires. We are requesting that the city allow us to improve 600 feet of Arrow HWg.o with asphalt curbs end gutters, utilize · septic system instead ef extending the sewer line, end not be required to ~)erferm any ef the ether elfsite iml~V&,,&nts that were requested bg city engineering. The bottom line to this project is that K&K 6olf has no leverage with the Cattelus group to have them assist in offsite improvements. K&K 6olf has a specific budget to install this project based on a five gear return. We feel the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its residents will benefit greatly from the project as outlined above with no apparent negative impact. We are asking for your assistance in making this project a reality. Bill Kaufmi~'~~ ' Harold Kneller -- ~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-05, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GOLF TRAINING FACILITY, CONSISTING OF A DRIVING RANGE, PUTTING GREEN, CHIPPING AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-24 A. Recitals. (i) K & K Golfing has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 93-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 10th day of March 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 10, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue with street frontages of 2,560 feet along Foothill Boulevard and 2,170 feet along Arrow Route, and is presently improved with detention basins, the balance of the site is Vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a detention basin, the property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is vacant, and the properties to the east and west are designated for industrial uses and contain a sports complex/animal shelter and a manufacturing building, respectively; and c. The development of the golf training facility is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Industrial designation of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 2 d. The application, together with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to'each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The height of the fencing along the east property line shall be designed to assure that stray golf balls do not enter the adjacent property. Information to demonstrate the safety of the fence height shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2) The final net color shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The poles and netting along the east property line shall be located to avoid conflict with the trees at maturity on the adjacent property. The final location shall be reviewed and approved by PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 3 the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The clubhouse design shall be revised and submitted for additional Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. The plans shall consider the following: a) A roof. b) Variation in the building planes. c) Elements/details consistent with the animal shelter. d) Combining the maintenance building with the clubhouse. The poles and netting shall be properly maintained at all times. Landscaping shall be provided within the streetscape setback area to match the established theme for Arrow Route. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 4 En~ineerina Division Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed as follows, subject to modification by and approval of Caltrans: a) b) c) 1) d) Street improvements on the south side, from west of Milliken Avenue to the east project boundary, including full pavement width, curb and gutter, and street lights. A landscaped median from Orchard Avenue to the next easterly median break, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If Caltrans does not approve a single segment of median, fees as contribution in-lieu of construction will be required in conformance with Condition No. 2. Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median as required by the City Engineer. Transitions to existing pavement east of the east project boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. 2) 3) e) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement for permanent improvements required north of the centerline from future development as it occurs on the north side of the street. f) The developer shall reimburse one-half the cost of the construction of the existing landscaped median segment from the west property line to Orchard Avenue. If Caltrans does not allow construction of the median island within Foothill Boulevard, then a fee as contribution in-lieu of construction for one-half the cost of the construction, including landscaping and irrigation, shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. A fee as contribution in-lieu of construction of one-half of the intersection pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March lO, 1993 Page 5 4) Modify the traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue as needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Install traffic signal at the intersection of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. "No Parking/Stopping" signs shall be posted on all public street frontages. Complete the Master Planned Storm Drain Line 17a in Arrow Route from its existing terminus fronting the subject parcel adjacent to the east to Milliken Avenue. Construct the local storm drain extension north in Milliken Avenue as required by the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the Master Planned portion of the facilities and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. 8) Provide a drainage study to determine flows reaching the site from the north. Construct protection from those flows on site or install the Foothill Master Plan Storm Drain according to the Terra Vista Master Plan from east of Milliken Avenue to the existing storm drain at Rochester Avenue as determined by the City Engineer. 9) Improve the railroad crossing on Arrow Route at the westerly property line as required by the City Engineer. 10) Provide additional dedication at the intersections of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard as required by the City Engineer. 11) A fee as contribution to one-half the cost of undergrounding utilities on the south side of Arrow Route at the west side of the parcel. 12) The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of the improvements determined by the City Engineer to be in conformance with Ordinance No. 445. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-05 - K & K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 6 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiet, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth day of March 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISIOH, (714) 9~.1861, FOR COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWIHG CONDrTIONS: A. Time Llmltl c-.,~e~x, d 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---/ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Deveiopment/Dealgn Review shell be approved prior to I I / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the apl:toval of / / SC - 2/91 4. Thedeveiopershellcommence, participatetn, andconsummateorcausstobecommenced, ---/ / participated in, or consummated, a MMIO-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Profeclfon District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the dt. vaiop,,~,4. The station shall be Ioc Ired, design~l, and built to all spacitications of the Rancho Cucal/x)nga Fire Protection District, and Shall become the District's pmg~rty upon compie~on. The eduipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shell comply with all ;q'~3tica~M laws and regulatio~. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time ~ion of the final map 5. Prior to recordation of the final map of the issuance of building parmits, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shell cormant to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Dist~ct for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school elistrict has previously estal~ished such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, conssnt to the annexation of the project site into the territop/of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building promits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not tonTmCl a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and I~ior to the reo3n~ation of the final map or issuance of building permits 1or said I:XOjeCt, this cofx:lition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waned it the City receives notice that the applicant and all atlected school districts have entered in{o an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community DevelopmeN. Such Miter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in tha case of sulxlivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. / / B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Deveioprnent Code regulations, and ~/~ ~,,~,-, ~/ Specific Plan and Planned Community. / / 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be cornplated to the satialactlon of the City Planner. / / 4. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshait's regulations have been complied with. Prior to _o,~__,pancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for co.,pllance prior to Revised site plans and building elevations incoqx)rsting all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, .building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot sulxlivision, or · approved use has commencod, whichaver comes first. o Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all eections of the Development Code, all other applicable Cily Orclinanoes, and arpl!:-"'.s Community Plato or Spacitic Plans in effect at the time of Building Perrail issuance. A detailed on-alta lighting plan shall be reviewed and appm~ by the City Planner and Shariff's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building pannits. S~ch plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, haigh~, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adlacent propodlas. / / _..J / / / 10. If no centralized trash mceptaclas are provided, all trash pick-up shall be tot individual units with all recel:Xacles shielded from pul~lic view. Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City stendard~. The final design, locations, and the num13er of trash receptacles shall be sul~ject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as trenslormers, AC condensers, etc., Shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination ol concrete or masonry walls, barming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. /, 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopied Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identtlied in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail (Irawings, shall be submitted ior City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract MaD and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade anti construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shell not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the Ol~ion of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards ot directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Horneowners' Association are sul:)~ct to the approval ot the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shell be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance ot building permits, whichever ocours first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shell be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means ex:x~le to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements st~l be dedk'.ated for the puq3oss of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adlacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision whic~ shall pe recorded concurrently with ~ recordation ot the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easemania shall pn~ibit the casting ot .shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excelX for utility wires an(i similar ol~s, pursuant to Dovalop.~d Code ,Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Histmtcal Landmink. The site sl~11 be developed and maihtalnad in accon:iance with the Historic Landmark Aiteratldn Permit No. · Any further modificatione to the sile including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations wNch affect the exterior of the buildings or stnJcfures, removal ot landma~ trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or chenges to the site, she# require a modification to the Historic Landmad~ Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commition review and C. Building 1. sc-2/9] De~lgn An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless othor alternative M~rgy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial deveiopmeht ~ be supplemented wilfi solar heating. Details shell be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation ot sudace treatment su~eot to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance ot building permits. 3 o1' 12 E(~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / . 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shell be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. / / / / D. Pa~ing and Vehicular Accoso (indicate d~tstl~ on bulMIng plans) v'/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shell heve a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the paddng stall (including cu~o). / / Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shell be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with ogen spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shell be striped per City standards. / / 4. All units Shell be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. / / The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall rest~otthe storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of tranapo~tion for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any secvrity gates shell be submltteq for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct review and apgmval Ixior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained lan4~:~ amee, refer to Section N.) 1..A detalied landscape and irrigatibn plan, lncluding sic9e Planting and modelhome iandscap- ing in the case of residential develogment, shall be I;Xegared by a licensed landecape architect and submitted for City Planner review and aR~oval ;xio~to the issuance of building permits or prior final ~ al:~:~;wal in the case of a custom lot sulxtivlaion. __/ / 2. Existing treas required to bo pmsMved in l:~Ke shall be l:XOteoted with a oonstmotion barrier ~ . in acco~ance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so r~ed on the grading Plans. The iccation of those tre~ to be preeewed in place and new locationa for transplanted trees shell be shown on the cietailad landKape plana. The alXXicant Nmll follow all of the art~orist's recommendations re~fCIk't~ pg'~w~ltibn, transl::danting and tdmming methoo~. A minimum of trees per gross acre, cornl~sed of the following sizes, shaft be provided within the IXOjeCt: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon. and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of 54) % of trees planted within the project shah be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shell fie ;danted at a rate of one 15-galion tree for eve~/ three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. / / / / __/ / SC - 2/9 ! o Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All ixivate slope banks 5 leer or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thdvlng condition by the developer until each individual unit is soldandoccupleclbythebuyer. Priorto releasing _oc_~__,panoyforttx)sounit$,aninspectlon shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multHamily residential ~ non-residential development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the put34ic right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and delve and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11 · Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Devalol~nent Code and/or · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planling. 12. The final design of the perimeter pehcways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be ' included in the requirecl lan~ ~ anti Nlall be I~ to City Planner review and approval and coo~linatad for c~)ns~ency with any padtway landec-Fing planwhich may be required by the Engineerthg Divleio~. 13. Special landacape fealurel suc~ as mounding, alluvial rock, a~n size trees, meander- ing sidewalks ~hodzontal ct~mge), and inteneillad lar~, i~ required along ,~-/-~..,~ 14. Landscaping and inigation ~ysterm required to ba installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of tl~ pmjact area strait be continuously maintained by tha developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design $1~lt ba coonJinated wifh the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be develol:~:l and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bullcling permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth ~aractertstk=s of the selected tree species. __ 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the pdnciplas of Xeriacape as defined in Chaplet 19.16 of tt~ Ranctto Cucamenga Municipal Code. Cow~cuon D~: / / / / / / / / __/ / / / __/ / / / .__/ / / / / / / / SC - 2/9 [ F. Signa The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance ot building parmits. G. Environmental / / / / The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as dete~minad by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a atandard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report Shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL the building materlal~ and conatruction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measuras. The building plans will he checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. / /,B H. Other Agencle~ 1. ' Ernsrgency secondmy access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standarde. 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance Iree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times during conatmction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance ol building parmits for combuatibie construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dtatric~ that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of reunited fire protection system. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to datmmine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-famity rasldential developments shall provide a solid ovamead structure for mail boxes with adequate ligtling. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sul~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building peri,its. __/ / __/ / __/ / For projects using septic tank facilities, written cortltication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Semardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFP..I¥ DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: · Site Development v/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Co~e, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and al:~licable handouts. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major acldifion to existing unit(s), the apG)ilcant shall pay deveio0ment fees at the estabashed rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Foe, Pafi~ Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building parmits for a ~ comnlorclaJ or Industrial development or addition to an existing development, the al:q:dicant shall pay development fees at the estatdished rate. Such lees may include, ~ are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Foes. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, alter tract/percal map recordation and prior to issuance of building parmits. J. Existing Structuroo 1. Provide co,,tpliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-reeistlvaness of existing buiJdlnge. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to cornply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shell be removed, filed and/or ~ to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4.: Underground on-Me utilities are to be Jocated and showfi on building plans suDmitted for building permit 81:~iicAtion. __/ / / / / / / / / / K. Gredlng 1. Grading of the sul~ect I~ shall be in acoordanco with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and ac~q:Jled grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in sul~-lantial cofi~ormanco with the aGq~wed grading plan. 2. A soils relx)fi shell be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to 3. The deveiol~mont is located within the soil erosion control boundarMs; a Soil Disturbance Permit is required. Please contact San B~narclino CoLinly I~nt of Agrtcuiture at (714) 387-2111 for penTtlt apl~iCstton. Docurnanlalfon of such permit shall be ~ubmitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological reporl shell be ~olMrod by a'quallllad engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of al~lication for grading plan chacO. v// 5. The final grading plans shall be coml~leted and approved IMor to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/9 [ 6. As a cusfom-lit subclivislon, the 1011owing requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary tor dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prlor to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage wafer that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, am to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the sulxlivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be sul~ect to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slipe banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other aftemetive method of erosion control ~ be completed to the ~tlsfactlin of the Building Official. In acldition a permanent intgatlin system shall be Ixovicied. This requirement clias not release the al~31icant/develiper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Develifxnent Code. No.: ~ ~'~-~ Co~[~tion Dat~: / / ,/ / _..Y / / / APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNI$1ON, (714) 088-18~2, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication ~ VeNcul~r &cceaa 1. Rights-of-way and easements shell be dedicated to the City tor all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public ~ areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or temative map. I=dvate easements for non-public ' facilities (croas-lit drainage, local fee<let trails, etc.) ~ be rasewa<t as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the foaowing rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): totaf feet on 3. An irmvocableolferofdedicaUonfor for all private streets or drives. / / -foo~ wile roadway easement shall be made ---/ / 4. Non-vehicular access shell be dedicated to the City for the following streets: SC-2/9! 5. Reciprocal access easements shell be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shail be recorded conourref~/with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no miKo is involved. / / 6. Private drainage easements 1orcross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map, 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'bl/ile hereby dad/cate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to l~oh/bit the constn~ct/on of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restrict/on areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of.way shell be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. .__/ / 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way __J shell be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicaed along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If cu~ adlacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. / / 11. The developer shell make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests __/ necessary to construct the required public improvements, and it he/she should fait to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submiltal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the imlxovement$ pumuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the propeffy i~eraa~ required forthe im13mvements. Such agreement shell provide for paymenl by the davelol:~ of all coi[i incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the mJbdivlalon. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash depoall in the amount given in an aplxalsal report obtained by the daveicier, at develope~'a co~t. The aplXalser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the a!~raisal. / / / / M. Street Improvement. 1 .' All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, __/ landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street im13mvement$ shall include, but are not limited to, cu~ and gutter, AC pavement. cl~ve approaches, sidewalks, street IigN~, and strae~ trees. 2. A minimum of 26- toot wide pavement, within a 40 -fool wide dedicated right.of-way shall be constructed for all hall-section streets. v'~ 3. Construct the following pratmeter street Improvements including, but not limited to: SC - 2/9 I. 9of 12 ~? Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) It so marked, side- walk shell be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction tee shall be provided for thls. item.('/~..4/'-/'~ 4. In'~vement plans and construction: Slreet improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and al~mved by the City Engineer. Security shell be posted and an agreement executed 1o the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the bub#c and/or p~ate street Improve- merits, prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. ,/ bo Prior to any work being pedormed in bublic fight-of-way, fees shall be peld and a construction permit shell be ol:~iined from the City Englneer'$ Office in addition to any other parmits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shell be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. do Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be irmtalled on any new c~netruction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which irlersact with other maior, secondary or collector streets for future ~&;;,ic signals. Pull boxes shem be placed on both siclos of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other Iocatio~ Koproved by the City Engineer. (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specilMd by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel w#h pullrope. e. Wheel chair raml~ shall be Installed on all four comers of intersections par City StandarOs or as clirecta<] by the City Engineer. Existing Cily made requiring construction ~11 remain open to traffic at all times with adequatedetoumdurlnggxxmtruction. A~treelcloasrepam~ maybe required. Acash deposit Shall be I:WOvkJed to ~3over the ~ of grading am:l paving, which shall be refunded upon coml~Uon of the con~truction to the satiMactiort of the CRy Engineer. g. Concefi~aied drainlge flows ~ nol ~ sidewalkS. Under $1de~'ai~ drains shall be installed to CRy Stan~tam~, excelX for singe famay lots. h. Handicap acce~ ramp design shall be as specified by the Cl~ Engineer. i. Street nemes sheJl be approved by the City Planner prtor to submittal for first plan check. Street irrq3mvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provida<i for review and N)lXOVal by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being periorated on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permils shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other pan~its requir~l. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed par City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. No.: C,,;~=t¢~.o~ ._./ / / / _._/ / / / / / __J / / / / / / / ,/ / sc- 2/9t ,/ 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by th~ City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. ~;~On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- ciosest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be oblalned from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: i~/~ ,1/ .P, tv~. 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: / /__ / / _..J / / / / / N. Public Maintenance AiI~ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape peri(ways, medians, paeeos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintena.~nc~.~ District: 4v . /vl 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Slate Landscape and Ughting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final ~ aplxovalor issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public isndaca~ng and intgation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4.~ Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conlon~ to the results of tr~ respective Beaut#ication Master Plan: / / / / O. Drainage and Flood Control The project (or portion~ thereof) is iocaled within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, liood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by It~e City Engineer. It shall be the deveiopar's raslx~nsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The deve~'s engineer shall IXePere all necassaty reports, plans, and hydroioglc/hydrauifc celculation~. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be ol~tained from FEMA ~ to final ~ al:~xoval or issuance of building permits, whichever _oc~__,rs first. A Letter ol Map Rev~ion (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or irn~ovement acceptance, whichever occurs first. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map al:~xoval or the issuance of building parmits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC - 2/9t / I 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for won~ within itsright-of-way. ./ 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk, / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded lo convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including senitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be pa3vided as required. 2, The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necossary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucarncnga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Deperlment of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final mep ap13rovai or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. / / / / .__J / / / / / Q. General Requlrement~ and Al~roval~ 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel 13dor to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shell be provided prior to final map apl;xoval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: ./ 3. Prior to approval of the final map a defx~it shell be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of a!:~x~dionlng the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4..'Etiwand~San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map apl:xovai or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shell be oblained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: 6. A signed consenf and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilitie~ Di~'k;I shall be filed with the City Engineer I;xior to final map al:q3rovai or the issuance of building permits, whichever _o~__,rs first. Formation costs shell be home by the Developer. 7. Prior to finaiizafion of any devaiof:m~enf phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure saconda~/access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundahes shall conespond to lot lines shown on the ap13mved tentalive map. / / / / / / / / SC - 2/91 DATE: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 17, 1993 Planning Commission Brad Bullet, City Planner MEMORANDUM Public Safety Commission Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City ManaX~~ PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION RESOLUTION PSC 93-001 - ON-SITE TRAFFIC CONTROL At the February 2, 1993 meeting of the Public Safety Commission the attached resolution was passed. This resolution concerns traffic control measures used on-site in commercial centers and used at the entry/exit points between commercial centers and the public roadway. This resolution is respectfully transmitted to the Planning Commission for its' consideration as they review site plans for commercial centers. Should there be any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Commission Chairman George Yankovich or Assistant to the City Manager Duane Baker at extension 2006. PSC/DAB/dab cc: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer ITEM F RESOLUTION NO. PSC 93-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING FINDINGS MADE IN RELATION TO ON SITE TRAFFIC CONTROL WHEREAS, the issue of on site traffic controls in commercial centers has been discussed at a public hearing of the Public Safety Commission; and WHEREAS, the safety of motorists and pedestrians is a concern of the Commission; and WHEREAS, it is easier for motorists to recognize traffic control devices like signs and striping when it is similar to traffic control devices used in the public right-of-way and for which they have been conditioned to recognize; and WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that on site traffic controls have an effect on traffic safety on the public streets particularly as those on site controls are used at the entrances and exits to commercial centers. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Public Safety Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. That striping used to control traffic in commercial centers should be consistent in [rattern and color with striping standards used in the public right-of-way. 2. That traffic signs used in commercial centers should be consistent in size and shape and color with those used in the public right-of-way. 3. That stop signs consistent in size, shape and color with City standards be installed at the exits of commercial centers, and that this should also apply to currently existing commercial centers that are presently undergoing or will be undergoing any renovation or repairs. 4. That the above referenced findings be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration in reviewing on site plans. Resolution No. PSC 93-001 Page 2 5. That the Planning Commission consider the above findings as it places conditions on commercial projects in the City. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 2nd day of February, 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Amodt, Glass, Ketally, Sieber, and Yankovich None Curatalo and West B George Yankovich, (2hairman J ATrEST: ..~- Jack Lam, Secretary I, JACK LAM, SECRETARY of the Public Safety Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Public Safety Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said Public Safety Commission held on the 2nd day of February, 1993. Executed this 3rd day of February, 1993, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Public Safety Commission 8 January 5, 1993 ~ ~ ~ehesl, l~e ;~ olr~rl~ at th~ ~ehnnl nnrl h~'~ not out there 'v%- th~y'r~ so seeing what the rest of the parents are seeing. Chaimtan even concerned direct staff to do another there is going to be a Commissioner West know about would also like to the school crossing guard that children that a letter should be sent to the and requesting that count and into educating the off. find out if they are He would also like to with some updated numbers and if Stork School, Sheriffs and PTA to let attend. Commissioner West stated that she are not interested in moving the the parents on where the Yankovich asked if that could be added to the letter and since fills will ju, L I.e a direc*;,,- tt~ ¢taf{~ no E3. Review of the possibility of putting stop signs at commercial property exits onto public streets - recommendation to Planning Commission. (Oral Regmrt) Chairman Yankovich gave the report stating that there is no policy regarding the exits from commercial property onto public streets, therefore some exits have no signs or limit lines and some do, but they're all different. He also added that he had visited with Planning Commissioner Larry McNiel many of the commercial areas, and Commissioner McNiel agreed that something should be done. Chairman Yankovich would like the Public Safety Corbanission to make a recommendation to the Planning Commission in the form of a policy for new commercial property areas which would include any retro-fit in the City so that it will become a requirement. Commissioner Sieber said that he felt that conformity would be good idea. Commissioner West asked why a recommendation from the Public Safety Commission was necessary since the Planning Commissioners have also visited the commercial areas and have agreed that the situation should be addressed. Chairman Yankovich answered that it is because he brought it up and it hasn't been discussed with the Planning Commission as a group, and because he would like to make a recommendation from Public Safety Commission not just from himself. DR FT IrOR [)ISCU$$10N F~URPOSES ONLY Public Safety Commission 9 January 5, 1993 Chairman Yankovich stated that the Planning Commission would appreciate the Public Safety Commission becoming more involved with the new developments in this way. That Commissioner Curatalo and himself have on several occasions attended a Planning Commission meeting to review a possible safety problem· Duane Baker, Assistant to City Manager stated that there were two ways to accomplish this effort; one, by making a motion now and being as specific as possible in the wording or two, by directing staff to draw up a resolution to be brought back to the Commission for their approval and presentation to the Plazning Commission. Sgt. Paul Kellner, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department asked if this resolution would cover enforcement and Chairman Yankovich answered no, that it would be written with the intent of developing style and conformity. Paul Rougeath Traffic Engineer questioned whether the intent is to require stop signs at all exits or to require uniformity. Sgt. Kellner, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department stated that a stop sign would probably be a great deterrent and save property damage. Commissioner Sieber asked if there was a concern about the public becoming immune to the stop sign and Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer said that it is always a concern with any traffic control device and it is particularly important with stop signs because they are so important when they're used properly. Over use encourages disrespect and people tend to ignore them. However, Mr. Rougeau agreed that uniformity is very important and that a general policy would be best and he would like the opportunity to review the resolution that is written and work with both Commissions on it. Chais'man Yankovich requested that he and staff work together in writing the resolution to come back in February, and all Commksioners agreed. (O q Chairman Yankovich stated tna~ ~..--r~tly th~:4~ast6p~sign east bound on Victoria Park Lane at Rochester some of the~..caxstance ~,,.'.:"~, south is obscured by trees planted in the parkway. Sout~%.,~clh downhill from Highland and L~,', r~ive and just before you · get to V~x,.a Park Lane there's a dip in the street. The east side of th~ l,.~7-*ction is c' :~%~JiF~ecause t~e street is not complete yet, and prooamy wm DRAI:T FOR' 11~11SCUSS!ON PURPOSES ONLY Public Safety Commission February 2, 1993 ~_~I~: Movecl by xmrkuvi,.1 ..... eadcd L: Cd,oo ,,, aFp, uve the ~vlmut 1, l~as presented. Motion carried 5-0-2 (Curatalo and West absent). The J; 1993, rm~were continued to March 2, 1993, due to lack of quorum. E.~~ ****** MMISSION BUSINESS - El. Report on traffic for a crossirtg Street (Continued from 1-$.93). !report Hellman Avenue at La Grande by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. Mr. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer stated on whose property the flood remove a portion of the wall. the property and greatly suggested that he would by memo of when this can the sight the Maintenance can be performed. has been made with the property owner and he is agreeable with our request to in keeping with the appearance of at the intersection. He notify the Commission Chairman public opened the meeting for public comments. were closed. no response, agreed that this was good news and would appreciate an E2. Resolution to be presented to Planning Commission regarding the commercial proper13, exits onto public streets. Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager stated that the resolution was prepared with all of the Commission's concerns and is ready for their direction. Commissioner Amodt stated that the item had been discussed in length at prior meetings and he felt that the Resolution covered everything as discussed. Commissioner Glass had one question regarding the present commercial property exits, and why they were not required to retro-fit. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer stated that the only time the City has the ability to require anything like that is if there is an application for a permit. Public Safety Commission February 2, 1993 MOTION: Moved by Yankovich, seconded by Glass that Resolution PSC 93-001, be Approved and presented to the Planning Commission at their next meeting. Motion carried 5-0-2 (Curatalo and West absent). Status upd~ate on rnoIo etadhr. Jerry looked During the photo radar demonstration, understanding that Deputy City Manager briefly stated that the Public Safety item about six months ago along with a number of other speed tigation, several Judges expressed concerns that they could as evidence in court. At that point the Sheriffs was canceled by the vendor. Mr. Pulwood feelings have not changed. a set up a that it is his Chairman Yankovich stated intention, it was brought completely shelved. there has been some it was unfinished and ei this item without needs to be finished or Commissioner Sieber said that due to and Commissioner Ketaily concurred. the item should be dropped, Commissioner Glass stated that especially and that this item was brought up as a process was broken down by not a d~cision. He understands that issue is not complete until all could not support it. As far the Council's opinion completely used and is are covered and financial issue is concerned it this makes for a hanging issue have speed problems He is more concerned that the the item and then making the City of Pasadena. The the Judges say that they investigated and is not acceptable. Chairman is necessary agreed 100% with Commissioner Glass, that a a decision. investigation Sieber said that the initial question was not appropriate, it be dropped or possibly shelved again for another six months. He added :he of it is impractical since the local bench will not support it, but possibly at a :r ,,,igh, b~ ,,,,,,,. ....