HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/04/14 - Agenda Packet1977
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY
APRIL 14, 1993
7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAHONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CH~fBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
R~NCHO CUC~ONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
III·
IV.
Commissioner Chitiea
Commissioner McNiel
Commissioner Melcher
Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Vallette
Announoamant~
Approval of Minutes
Adjourned Meeting of February 3, 1993
Adjourned Meeting of March 10, 1993
March 24, 1993
V. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected
to be routine and non-controversial. They will be
acted on by the Commission at one time without
discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14410 -
CUNNINGHAM-BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A
request for a residential subdivision and
Design Review of 35 single family lots on 10
acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units Der acre) located 364 feet
south of 19th Street on the east side of Beryl
Street -APN: 202-041-01, 17, 22, and 24.
Related File: Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10.
Public Hearinqs
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
VII ·
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT - A residential
subdivision of 30 single family lots on 10.6
acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units per acre) generally located
on the north side of 19th Street between
Mayberry Avenue and Morocco Street -
APN: 1076-141-01 and 02, 1076-131-01. Staff
recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative
Declaration. Related File: Tree Removal
Permit No. 92-20.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 14331 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT - A subdivision
of 25 acres of land into two parcels in the
Office Park (OP) designation of the Terra Vista
Planned Community, located at the northeast
corner of Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard
- APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration.
De
VARIANCE 93-02 - SCHLOSSER FORGE - A request to
reduce the required number of parking spaces
and to eliminate the requirement for one tree
to be planted every 30 lineal feet of building
in conjunction with a 23,200 square foot
addition to an existing manufacturing building
in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District
(Subarea 9) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located south of Arrow Route, west of
Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-111-17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
93-04 - SCHLOSSER FORGE - A request to
construct a 23,200 square foot addition to an
existing manufacturing building in the Minimum
Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located
south of Arrow Route, west of Rochester Avenue
- APN: 229-111-17. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-03 - FOOTHILL MAR/fETPLACE
PARTNERS - A request to construct approximately
88,000 square feet of retail space within a
previously approved commercial retail center in
the Regional Related Commercial designation
(Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan, located south of Foothill Boulevard, east
of 1-15 - APN: 229-031-41.
EVALUATION AND COMMENT ON PROPERTY ACOUISITION
FOR A NEW HIGH SCHOOL SITE IN ETIWANDA -
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT -
Pursuant to State Law (Public Resources Section
21151.2), the School District requests that the
Planning Commission comment on a proposed 53
acre high school site located at the northeast
corner of Highland and East Avenues -
APN: 225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20.
Director's Reports
H. FISCAL YEAR 1993/94
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ENGINEERING'S
IX. Public Comments
CAPITAL
XI.
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
X. Commission Business
I. TRANSITION OF DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
- Oral Report
J. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - VARIATION IN LOT
SIZES - Oral Report
K. DISCUSSION OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
REVISION WITH REGARD TO BALANCE OF WORK PROGRAM
- Oral Report
Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
April 14, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Steven Ross, Assistant Planner
TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM-BARISIC
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for a residential
subdivision and Design Review of 35 single family lots on 10
acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre) located 364 feet south of 19th Street on the
east side of Beryl Street - APN: 202-041-01, 17, 22, and
24. Related File: Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10.
BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14410 was approved by the Planning
Commission on March 27, 1991 for a period of two years, as allowed by
the Development Code. The approval included the design review for the
homes as well as the subdivision map for the tract. The Tentative Tract
was set to expire on March 27, 1993, but a letter requesting a one-year
time extension was received by the Planning Division before the March
27, 1993 deadline. Time extensions may be granted in 12-month
increments for up to 36 months from the original expiration date.
ANALYSIS:
General: Tentative Tract 14410 is located south of 19th Street
between Beryl Street and the Hellman/Beryl Channel in the Low
Residential zone. Residential areas exist to the west, south, and
east, and a church is located to the north. The approved tract map
proposes 35 single family lots which range in size from 8,000 to
~6,000 square feet. Three 2-story floor plans ranging from 2,100 to
2,500 square feet were also approved for plotting on the lots.
Development Standards: The development standards which apply to Low
Residential Districts have not changed since the project was
approved. Therefore, the project is still consistent with these
standards.
ITEM A
PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM-BARISIC DEV. CORP.
April 14, 1993
Page 2
RECO~4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co~nission approve a
one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 14410 through adoption of
the attached Resolution of Approval.
City Planner
BB:SR:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan/Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations
Resolution No. 91-29, Approving Tentative Tract 14410
Resolution No. 91-30, Approving the Design Review for
Tentative Tract 14410
Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for Tentative
Tract 14410
Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for Design
Review of Tentative Tract 14410
.Cunningham - Barisic Development Corporation
I ~ Fh,x~cr ~Ircct f¥.u~ac ('~£t,r~ia tI:~ (714) fiG4-; ~, .
· ~, '~, i
February 26, 1993
;ITY OF RANCHO
PLANNING
~lAR 0 ~_ 1993
~M
~iSm9~ttll¢)~3
Planning Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Att: Jerry Guaracino
Re: Extension Tentative Tract 14410
Dear Jerry:
Please find this as formal request to extend the above referenced Tentative Tract
Map for a period of not less than one (1) year. Please extend the Tentative
Tract Map under the same conditions of approval stated in the acceptance and
approval of March 27, 1991 by the Planning Commission.
Should you have any questions or require anything additional, please do not
hesitate to call me.
Ve,ry. truly yours,
Mar~. Gerber
Vice'. Presi dent
MG/mm
xHI£/T' "
VAUNT
PLANI~I':'N'O-.. D 'iV/SION £xi-tmrr: "B'~CAI..£: I'q'T,~
jJJJJ
· -t"?" lqq~C)
i
'T'T' /c/q/0
.i
'1
I
~ ~ oNou~u Ol.~t~ 'ON ~
~ ~ o14oueu OI, t~t 'ON ~
t
RESOLUTION NO. 91-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 14410 AND RELATED TREE REMOV~AL PERMIT NO. 90-10,
LOCATED 364 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF
BERYL STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN= 202-041-01, 17, 22, AND 24.
A. Recitals.
(l) Cunningham Barisic Devilolxaent Corporation has filed an
application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14410 as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Tract Map reques~ is referred to as 'the application."
(ii) On the 27th of March 1991, the Planning Com~aission of the City
of Rancho Cut·mings conducted · duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said he·ring on that data.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Risolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc~monga as follows=
1. This Co~mission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, ParC &, of this Resolution are true and correct.
during thi Above-referenced public hearing on ~ch 27, 1991, including
written and oral staff riperrs, together with public testimony, this
(~) The application applies to propez~cy located 364 feet south
of 19th Street on the east side of Beryl Street with i street frontage of 660
feet and lot depth of 660 feet and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the lubeact litl ila church,
the properCy to the iou=h of that litl conllltl of single family relidential,
the property to the init II the Beryl/Hillman channel and relidential, and the
property to the wist il lingle fam£1y relidenti·l~
(c) The application and related Tree Re,~val Permit application
request, contemplatel the re,oval of all 17 existing mature treeIs and
(d) Written input from the affected school diltrictl indicates
insufficient capacity to accommodate itudentl generated from this project.
PLANNING COMMISSION & ~OLUTION NO. 91-29
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
MarCh 27, 1991
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this CO~-~tssion hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That tentative trac~ is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specific planl; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed; and
(d) The design of the subdivision is no~ likely to cause
substantial environmental d~mage and avoidable lnJuL7 to humans and wildlife
or their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems; and
(f) The design of the tentative tract w£11 not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and ce~cif£es that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Env£ronmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cce~nission hereby issues a Neqat£ve
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Coaenission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions, attached hereto and £ncoEporated herein by this reference.
Plannina Dlv£s£on~
Pr£or to recordation of the final map or the issuance
of building poEmits, whichever c~nes first, the
applicant shall consent to, or part£cipete in, the
esteblishneent of a Hello-Ross C~nity Facilities
Distric~ pertaining to the pro3ect site to provide in
conJunc~ion with the applicable school district for
the construction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has
previously established such a Coeeaunity Facilit£es
District, the applicant shall, in the alternative,
consent to the annexation of the project site into
the territory of such existing district prior to the
recordation of the final map or the issuance of
building permits, whichever c~es first.
PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION NO. 91-29
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPetENT CORP.
March 27, 1991
Page 3
Further, it the affected school district has not
formed a Malls-Roes Co~munity Facilities District
within twelve months of the date of approval of the
project and prior to the recordation of the final map
or illuance. of building permits for said project,
this condition shall be deemed null and void.
2e
Tree Removal Plrmit No. 90-10 is hereby approved
subject to replacement pllnting on · one-to-one basis
with Eucalyptus. m&culata (Spotted Gum), minimum 15-
gallon size, in conjunction with slope planting along
the easterly tract boundm~y. Said replacement
planting shall be noted on the landleaps plans.
Pursuant to provisionl of california Public Resources
Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be
operative, vested or final, nor will building permits
be issued or a map recorded~ until (1), the Notice of
Determination (NOD) regarding the associated
environmental action is filed and posted with the
Clerk of thl Board of Supervisors of the County of
San Bernardino7 and (2), any and all requ£red filing
fell allellld pursuant to California Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4, together with any required
handling charges, Ire paid to the County Clerk of the
County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall
provide the Planning Department with a stamped and
conformed copy of the Notice of Determination
together with a rlceil~c showing that all fees have
been paid.
In the event this application is determined exempt
fro~ lUCh filing fees pursuant to the provisi~ns of
the California Fish and G~ Code, or the guidelines
prumulgated thereunder, excap~c for paint of any
r~lr~ hlndlin~ charge for filing i ~lfica~e of
F~ Ex~ption, thi~ condition Ihll~ ~ de~d null
and vo~d.
Bnainoerino Division:
The existing overhead utilities (teleco~munications
and electrical), on the project side of Beryl Strllt,
shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site
north of the proJect'e north boundary to the first
pole south of the project°e south boundary, prior to
public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever
OCCUrl firIt. The developer may request a
reLmbursoment agreement to recover one-half the City
adopted cost for undergrounding from future
development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the
PLANNING COMMISSION . OLUTION NO. 91-29
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
March 27, 1991
Page 4
Landscaping within the "Limited Use Area' for the
project intersections at Beryl Street shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
The portion of the Beryl/Hellm~n channel, including
access reade, within the project bound~ries, shall be
dedicated to the City.
The proper~y within the project boundaries east of
the Beryl/Hellm~n channel access road shall be
labeled a Lot "A.' The developer shall make a good
faith effo~ to deed Lot 'A' to the adjacent property
to the north.
5. The portions of those parcels known am APN= 202-041-
36 ~nd 202-981-23 west of the centerline of the
Be~l/Hellman channel aha11 be incorporated into this
tract by a lot line adjustment to be recorded prior
to the approval of the final m~p. Lots 11 through 14
shall be extended elitefly to include the area west
of the west channel &CClll road.
A request to vacate thl eXClll City itorm drainage
eale~ent Wilt of tht reit Btryl/Hellman channel
approval of the final m~p.
6. The Secret~ to th£1 ~llliOn Ihall ceL~cify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH 1991.
P.~ING~SION OF THE CITY OF PJ~NCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning ~llsion of the City of Rancho
Cuc~monga, do hereby ce~lfy that the fo=ego£ng Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, palled, and adop=~ by ~he Plying CmilliOn of the
City Of Rancho ~c~nga, a~ a =e~lar Ne=ing of =he PLa~ing ~iliion held
on the 27=h day of March 1991, by ~he reliving ~o~e-~o~i~,
AYES=
COMMISSIONERS~ CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES= COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONE~
NONE
I I I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
FOR TRACT NO. 14410 AND RELATED THEE REMOVAL PERMIT NO.
90-10, LOCATED 364 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET ON THE EAST
SIDE OF BERYL STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-
4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-041-01, 17, 22, AND 24.
A. Recitals.
(i) Cunningham Barisic Develolxaent Corporation has filed an
application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14410 as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on M~rch 27, 1991, including. written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) That the proposed project £s consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed design is in Accord with the objectives
of the Development COde ~nd the purposes of the district in which the s£~e Ls
located~ and
(c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of ~he
applicable provisions of the Development Code~ and
(d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, s&fe~¥, or
welfare or materially lnJurioul to props=tie8 or improvement8 in the
PLANNING COMMISSION
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM
March 27, 1991
Page 2
;OLUTION NO. 91-30
BARISiC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Co~miesion hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannine Dlv£sion=
1. Eliminate the double wall condition along the
south proper~y line which ie shown on the
landscape plan.
2. Delete the retaining wall which projects into the
front yard of Lots 23 and 24.
3. A color sample for the stucco cross-lot fencing
shall be submitted for staff review and approval.
The cap detail for the perimeter slumpstone wall
shall match that used on the Victoria Community
walls.
Project signage for the Beryl Street entries shall
be reviewed and approved by staff prior ~o
issuance of building permits.
Recreational vehicle gates shall be installed
adjacent to the garage where setbacks allow (10-
foot or larger side yardi).
All perimeter walls and fencing shall be
constructed per the concel~CUal grading plan and
wall/fence plan.
All landscaping and irrigation along the Beryl
pl~nting, shall be completed per the conceptual
l~ldlcape plan.
Tree R~oval Permit No. 90-10 is hereby approved
subject to replacement planting on a one-to-one
balLS with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum),
minimum 15-gallon size, in conjunction with slope
planting along the easterly tract boundary. Sa£d
replacement planting shall be noted o~ the
landlCape plans.
4. The Secretary to this CoalsEssion shall certify the adoption of
this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION
TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM
March 27, 1991
Page 3
,OLUTION NO. 91-30
BARISIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAR~H 1991.
PLANNING CO~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and ado~fced by the Planning C~lssion of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at & regular meeting o£ the Planning ~o~mission held
on the 27th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-witz
AYES:
COMMISSIONERSz CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS~ NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINQ A TIME EXTENSION
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14410 AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL
PERMIT NO. 90-10, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP LOCATED
364 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL
STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 D~ELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKINQ FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APNz 202-041-01, 17, 22, and 24.
A. Recitals
(i) Cunningham-Barisic Development Corporation has filed an
application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 14410 and related Tree
Removal Permit No. 90-10 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request Is referred
to as "the application."
(ii) On March 27, 1991, this Con, lesion adopted its Resolution
No. 91-29, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 14410 and Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10.
(iii} All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Convission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows~
1. This C~mniesion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Co~mission hereby specifically
finds as follows~
&. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
distressed market climate for development of the project.
b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions
make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time.
c. That strict enforcement of the conditions. of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the
Development Code.
d. That the granting of said -time extension will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TE FOR TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM-BARISIC
April 14, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
i and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for:
Tre~% ADDlicant ExPiration
TT 14410
and
Tree Removal Permit
No. 90-10
Cunningham-Barisic
Development Corp.
March 27, 1994
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. NcNiel, Chairman
ATTEST=
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cuc~monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Con~ission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at · regular meeting of the Planning Co~nission held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSION~St
NOES=
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENTs
COMMISSIONERSz
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14410 AND
RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. 90-10, A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED TRACT MAP LOCATED 364 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET
ON THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE}, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-041-01, 17, 22,
and 24.
A. Recitals
(i) Cunningham-Barisic Develolxoent Corporation has filed an
application for the extension of the Design Review for Tentative Tract
No. 14410 and related Tree Removal Permit No. 90-10 as described in the title
of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time
Extension request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On March 27, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 91-30, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
the Design Review for Tentative Tract No. 14410 and Tree Removal Permit No.
90-10.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Co~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows=
1. This Ccmun~ssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows=
a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
distressed market climate for development of the project.
b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions
make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time.
c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the
Development Code.
d. That the granting of said time extension will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
PLANNING COMMISSION R~SOLUTION NO.
DR FOR TT 14410 - CUNNINGHAM-BARISIC
April 14, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for~
Tract
Design Review for
TT 14410
and
Tree Removal Permit
No. 90-10
ADolicant
Cunningham-Barisic
Development Corp.
ExPiration
March 27, 1994
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY=
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTESTs
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning C _c~__ission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucmmongm, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISEIONERS~
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 14, 1993
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Chair~n and Members of the Planning Co~nission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATI~-E TRACT 15531 - HIX
DEVELOPMENT - A residential subdivision of 30 single family
lots and one lettered lot on 10.6 acres of land in the Low
Residential Development District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) generally located on the north side of 19th Street
between Mayberry Avenue and Morocco Street - APN:
1076-141-01 and 02, 1076-131-01. Related file: Tree Removal
Permit 92-20.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: 2.8 dwelling units per acre.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Future Foothill Freeway right-of-way; Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre)
South - Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
East - Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
West - Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Low Residential
North - Low Residential
South - Low Residential
East - Low Residential
West - Low Residential
Site Characteristics: This rectangular shaped site contains the
H.W. Minor residence, which has been designated as a local Historic
Point of Interest, and several accessory structures associated with
the Alta Loma Egg Ranch and Store. A majority of the site is a
cultivated citrus grove. A windrow of ma~ure Eucalyptus trees runs
north to south along the eastern boundary of the property. The site
slopes from north to south at approximately 4 percent.
ITEM B
PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 15531 - HIX
April 14, 1993
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
General: The applicant is proposing to subdivide this site for the
future development of 29 new single family homes. A separate design
review application will be processed in the future to construct the
29 new homes on this subdivision. One of the lots will contain the
H.W. Minor residence and a new detached garage that emulates the
architectural character of the house. The proposed lots range in
size from 7,223 to 12,935 square feet with an average lot size of
9,761 square feet. In addition, the northern 1.95 acres of the site
has been designated as a lettered lot for the future Foothill
Freeway right-of-way.
This infill tentative map has been designed to take its 19th Street
access from existing locations at Mayberry and Cartilla Avenues.
Two east/west cul-de-sac streets and one east/west through street
(Heather) allows secondary access in compliance with Fire District
requirements for the northern half of the project. All three of
these streets line-up with existing streets east and west of the
site. This street design creates north/south lots that side onto
the contiguous properties.
Neighborhood Meeting: On December 8, 1992, a neighborhood meeting
was held to allow neighbors of the immediate vicinity an opportunity
to comment on the proposal prior to the Planning Commission's public
hearing. No objections to the proposed subdivision design were
voiced by any residents attending this meeting.
Design Review Committee: On December 15, 1992, the Com~nittee
(McNiel, Melcher, Coleman) reviewed the proposal and recommended
approval subject to the following conditions:
.Rather than providing a 90-degree angle for the block wall at
the southwest corner of Lot 29, an angled or curved wall should
be provided as a transition to the wrought iron fencing on Lot
30. This will open up the views to the H.W. Minor house.
Landscaping and wall treatments for 19th Street should be
consistent with the master plan for 19th Street (i.e., stucco
with rock pilasters and retaining walls).
Rock pilasters should be used along Mayberry Avenue from
~9th Street to Heather Street. This will provide a logical
termination of the 19th Street theme wall.
The design of the sound attenuation wall should be considered
with the Design Review application for this subdivision.
All of these items have been incorporated into the attached
Resolution of Approval for the Tentative Tract Map.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 15531 - HIX
April 14, 1993
Page 3
De
Technical Review Committee: On December 16, 1992, the Technical
Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the
recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with
all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee
reviewed and conceptually approved the project at its meeting on
December 15, 1992.
Tree Removal: In conjunction with the Tentative Tract Map, the
applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit No. 92-20 for the
removal of the existing Eucalyptus windrow along the eastern
boundary of the project (see Exhibit "B"). In addition, the
applicant is proposing to remove the entire citrus grove on the
property, which is not protected under the City's Tree Preservation
Ordinance. An arborist report was prepared to assess the overall
health, structure, and preservation potential for the 20 protected
trees on the property. The report s-mmarized that the trees are
generally in fair to poor condition. However, the report
recommended that the deodar cedar in front of the Minor House and
7 of the 19 trees in the north/south eucalyptus windrow on-site be
preserved. Since the tentative map is for subdivision purposes only
at this time and none of the 7 trees are within the future public
right-of-way, all of the trees recommended for preservation can
remain in place. For the remaining 12 trees recommended for
removal, staff will recommend replacement planting per Ordinance
No. 276. Conditions of approval pertaining to preservation and
replacement are contained in the attached Resolution of Approval for
the Tentative Tract Map. However, it can be anticipated that
additional removal will be requested at the time of development
because of tree locations which conflict with proposed improvements
(i.e., house pads, walls, driveways).
Historic Preservation Commission: On December 8, 1992, the Historic
Preservation Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the historic significance of the H.W. Minor House and the
Alta Loma Egg Ranch and Store. The Commission recommended that the
house be designated a local historic point of interest and that the
egg ranch structures could be demolished and commemorated through
the placement of placards within the rock wall pilasters near the
intersection of 19th Street and Mayberry Avenue. The City Council
approved this action at their meeting on January 6, 1993.
Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II, the
Environmental Checklist, and found that there could be a significant
noise impact on residents of the project if the proposed Foothill
Freeway is constructed in the future, a~ well as noise impaction
generated by the current traffic flow on 19th Street. An acoustical
analysis recommended that a minimum 6-foot high wall be built along
the 19th Street frontage and a 14-foot wall along the future freeway
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 15531 - HIX
April 14, 1993
Page 4
right-of-way to mitigate future noise problems. Staff has
recommended that the sound mitigation wall be constructed with the
future development of this tract, consistent with the requirements
of other developments in this situation. Therefore, staff has found
that although the project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because of the mitigation measures included in the project design
and conditions of approval. If the Co~nission concurs, then
issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order.
FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public
health or safety or cause nuisance or significant adverse environmental
impacts. In addition, the project's use, subdivision map, and
conceptual plans, together with the conditions of approval, are in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and
City standards.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices were sent to the adjacent property owners within 300
feet of the project site, as well as an expanded notification area. In
addition, a neighborhood meeting was held.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a
mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract 15531 and
related Tree Removal Permit No. 92-20 through adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
BB:SH/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Site Profiles and Sections
Resolution of Approval
C OF '.RA~CiHO~(.~ UCAMONGA
PLANNINe,-. DIVISION
ITEM: ')T
EXHIBIT: SCALE:
PLANI'~INO.-DMSION
· //8 ~n
EXI-EBrr: SCALE:
ITEM:
1'
C . OF ~(2HC~:~UCAMONGA
PLANNI'NC~. DIVISION
F :' L
rl'EM: '"if'
EXI-LI~IT: //C" SCALE:
I
:
I
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 15531, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 30 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS AND ONE LETTERED LOT ON 10.6 ACRES OF LAND IN
THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE), AND RELATED TREE HEMOVAL PERMIT NO. 92-20,
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET,
BETWEEN RAYBERRY AVENUE AND MOROCCO STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-141-01 AND 02
AND 1076-131-01.
A. Recitals.
(i) Hix Development has filed an application for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 15531 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 14th day of April 1993, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City o~ Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Con~nission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on April 14, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the north
side of 19th Street, generally between Mayberry Avenue and Morocco Street with
a 19th Street frontege of 371 feet and lot depth of 824 feet and is presently
improved with an historic house, an egg ranch and store, and chicken coops in
the western portion of the site and curb, gutter, and sidewalks on a majority
of the site'e exterior boundaries (19th Street, Mayberry Avenue, and Morocco
Street) and
(b) The property to the north of ~he subject site is vacant and
designated as future right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway, the property to
the south contains single family residences, and the properties to the east
and west are developed with single family subdivisions; and
PI2%NNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 2
(c) The application contemplates the preservation of the H. W.
Minor House, a local Historic Point of Interest, on one of the 30 lots and
removal of all structures associated with the Alta Loma Egg Ranch and Store,
as directed by the City Council on January 6, 1993~ and
(d) The application contemplates the removal of a cultivated
citrus grove, which is not specifically protected by the City's Tree
Preservation Ordinance, and a majority of a mature Eucalyptus windrow which
will require replacement planting per the Tree Preservation Ordinance~ and
(e) The subdivision configuration meets all health, safety, and
access criteria established by the City's Fire District and Engineering
Division.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, thia Commission hereby finds and
concludes aa follows=
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the Oeneral Plan
and Development Code~ and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan and Development Code~ and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed~ and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife
or their habitat~ and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems~ and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated
Negative Declaration.
5. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 3
Plannin~ Division
1)
Pursuant to provisions of California Public
Resources Code Section 21089(b), this
application shall not be operative, vested or
final, nor will building permits be issued or a
map recorded, until (1) the Notice of
Determination (NOD) regarding the associated
environmental action is filed and posted with
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all
required filing fees assessed pursuant to
California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4,
together with any required handling charges,
are paid to the County Clerk of the County of
San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide
the Planning Department with a stamped and
conformed copy of the NOD together with a
receipt showing that all fees have been paid.
In the event this application is determined
exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the
provisions of the California Fish and Game
Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder,
except for payment of any required handling
charge for filing a Certificate of Fee
Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null
and void.
2)
An angled or curved wall shall be provided as a
transition to the wrought iron fencing at the
intersection of Lots 29 and 30, to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
3)
Landscaping and wall treatment for 19th Street
shall be consistent with the master plan for
19th Street, to the satisfaction of the City
Planner and City Engineer.
4)
Rock pilasters shall be used along Mayberry
Avenue from 19th Street to Heather Street to
provide a logical termination of the
19th Street theme wall. The size and spacing
of the pilasters shall be shown on the detailed
landscape/irrigation plans and be subject to
review and approval of the City Planner prior
to the issuance of building p~_rmits.
5)
The design of the sound attenuation wall shall
be considered with the Design Review
application for this subdivision and
construction made a condition thereof.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 4
6)
Tree Removal Permit No. 92-20 shall be approved
subject to the following conditions in
accordance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Trees 2-5, 7, 8, 10-12, and 14-16 may be
removed as required to construct public
street improvements per the final grading
plan and final map. Replacement planting
of 15-gallon size Eucalyptus maculata
(spotted Gum) spaced at a minimum of 8
feet on center, properly staked and
irrigated, shall be provided along the
east side of the property, outside of any
easements. Replacement planting shall be
deferred until development of the houses
to ensure proper maintenance.
Trees No. 1, 6, 9, 13, and 17-20 shall be
preserved in place per the recon~endations
of the consulting arborist's study. All
protection and pruning measures specified
by the arborist, including fences around
the perimeter drip lines, shall be
administered prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits.
The Planning Division shall conduct an
inspection to verify if these measures are
adequately implemented prior to commencing
grading on the proper~y.
Any wood infested with longhorn borer
beetles shall be chipped, removed, and
buried at a dump site or tarped to the
ground for a minimum of six months,
sealing the tarp edges with soil, to
prevent emerging borer beetles from
reinresting other trees or wood.
Approval of Tree Removal Permit No. 92-20
shall be valid for a period of 90 days,
subject to extension. The 90 days shall
start from the date of final map
recordation or grading permits, whichever
comes first.
The Planning Division (~nd if applicable
Engineering Division) shall be contacted
within 30 days of the planting of the
trees to conduct an inspection.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 5
7)
The following items shall be accomplished to
mitigate the demolition of the Alta Loma Egg
Ranch and Store and the existing detached two-
car garage for the H. W. Minor House~
a)
The historical significance of the Alta
Loma Egg Ranch Store, and related
structures, and the Citrus Grove shall be
documented through the incorporation of a
plaque or similar historic monument (with
text subject to review and approval of the
City Planner) located on a rock pilaster
within the perimeter fencing near the
intersection of 19th Street and Mayberry
Avenue. The design and text for the
plaque shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner and, if applicable,
City Engineer prior to the issuance of
grading permits. Any other necessary
documentation required by the City for the
structures proposed for removal shall be
provided prior to the issuance of
demolition permits.
b~
A new detached garage (two-car or larger)
shall be constructed on Lot 30, to the
satisfaction of the City Planner within
120 days from the issuance of demolition
permits for the existing garage. The
design of the garage shall closely emulate
the architecture of the H. W. Minor house
to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Plans for the new garage shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Planner prior to
the issuance of demolition permits for the
existing garage.
A Minor Exception application shall be filed
for review and approval of the City Planner for
minor streetscape setback reductions required
to preserve the H. W. Minor House in place.
This application shall be approved prior to
recordation of the final map.
Enoineerin~ Division
1)
The existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) on the
project side of 19th Street shall be
undergrounded from the first pole on the west
side of Mayberry Avenue to the first pole
off-site east of the project's east boundary,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 6
prior to public improvement acceptance or
occupancy, whichever occurs first. The
developer may request a reimbursement
to recover one-half the City's adopted cost
undergrounding from future redevelopment al
occurs on the opposite side of the street. If
the developer fails to submit for said
reimbursement agreement within six met of
public improvements being accepted by City,
all rights of the developer to !sement
shall terminate.
2) Existing overhead utilities shall be
removed.
3) Widen Mayberry Avenue to a curb-to-curb
width of 36 feet. existing
pavement as necessary to a proper
crown, to the satisfact of the City
Engineer.
dedication/for Mayberry Avenue
4) Right-of-way to the fao~of the perimeter wall.
shall extend
5) The boundary between~ot A and Lots 1-5 shall
be resolved to the/satisfaction of Cal-Trans
prior to final map ~pproval.
6) Install Master P~an Storm Drain line 4-K in
19th Street frCm Haven Avenue to Cartilla
Avenue, or as~termined by the final drainage
study, and provide lateral local storm drains
as needed, ~ the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. ~e developer shall be eligible for
drainage ~r credit and reimbursement for
permanent ~aster plan facilities in accordance
with Cit~ policy. If the developer fails to
submit ~r said reimbursement agreement within
six m~nths public improvements being
of
accepted by the City, all rights of the
deve~per to reimbursement shall terminate.
7 ) Co~truct a reduced radius turn around in
r~cOCCO Street north of Finch Avenue,
onstruct existing drive approaches as
~ecessary on the east side, and extend the new
/ sidewalk on the west side .to meet existing
/ sidewalk on the east side. If the adjacent
property owner will not agree to reconstruction
of his drive approach and frontage curb and
gutter, the reduced radius cul-de-sac shall be
offset on the west side with the same 25-foot
PI~a_NNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 6
2)
3)
5~
7)
occupancy, whichever occurs first. The
developer may request a reimbursement agreement
to recover one-half the City's adopted cost for
undergrounding from future redevelopment as it
occurs on the opposite side of the street. If
the developer fails to submit for said
reimbursement agreement within six months of
public improvements being accepted by the City,
all rights of the developer to reimbursement
shall terminate. The service to the south side
of 19th Street shall be undergrounded at the
same time as the main line.
Existing overhead utilities on-site shall be
removed.
Widen Mayberry Avenue to a total curb-to-curb
width of 36 feet. Reconstruct existing
pavement as necessary to provide a proper
crown, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
Right-of-way dedication for Mayberry Avenue
shall extend to the face of the perimeter wall.
The boundary between Lot A and Lots 1-5 shall
be resolved to the satisfaction of Cal-Trans
prior to final map approval.
Install Master Plan Storm Drain line 4-K in
19th Street from Haven Avenue to Cartilla
Avenue, or as determined by the final drainage
study, and provide lateral local storm drains
as needed, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for
drainage for credit and reimbursement for
permanent master plan facilities in accordance
with City policy. If the developer fails to
submit for said reimbursement agreement within
six months of public improvements being
accepted by the City, all rights of the
developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
Construct a reduced radius turn around in
Morocco Street north of Finch Avenue,
reconstruct existing drive approaches as
necessary on the east side, and extend the new
sidewalk on the west side to meet existing
sidewalk on the east side. If the adjacent
property owner will not agree to reconstruction
of his drive approach and frontage curb and
gutter, the reduced radius cul-de-sac shall be
offset on the west side with the same 25-foot
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15531 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 1993
Page 7
radius. Provide curb-adjacent sidewalk around
the cul-de-sac bulb, transitioning to property
line-adjacent on the straight section of
street.
s~
Remove the existing 4-foot sidewalk along
19th Street and replace it with 5-foot wide
(minimum) sidewalk adjacent to the proposed low
retaining wall. Measure the 5 feet from the
face of the wall or veneer if required. The
width shall transition from the existing
5 1/2-foot section adjacent to Lot 30, to the
existing 5-foot section at the east project
boundary.
The low retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk
on 19th Street shall have a decorative
treatment to resist graffiti.
10) Label all curb outlets as "private" on the
street improvement plane.
11) The footing for the perimeter wall shall not
encroach into the public landscape easement.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Con~niseion of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning C~mniesion held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following v3~te-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
~8TY OG!
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Those items checked are Conditions of Approval.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 9~-1861, FOR COMPUANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDrrlONS:
A. Time Llmltl
,/
v/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by tm Planning Con~ission, # building permits are
not issued or approved use has not commenced witl~n 24 months tram the date of apgroval.
2. Development/Design Review Shall be al=l~oved ~ to I /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No.
granted subject to the KOlXOVal of
4. The developer shall con~nce, participate in, ~ consummae or cause to be commenced,
participated in,.or consurnmatecI, a Idalfo-Rcos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Profecaon Dtal~t to finance conetnJc~n and/or maintenance ol
a fire station to sewe the dev~. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specifications ol the Rancho Cucamonga Rre Protection District, and shall become the
Districts prOl~rty ufx)n con~. The equipment shal be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the cioveiopar shall comply with all
aliiCable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final real:)
Prior to recordation of the final rnal) or the issuance of bullcling parmits, whichever comes
first. the al:~icant shall con~ent to, or particil)ate in, the establistVl~nt of a Mello-Rcos
Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessaq, school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously eata~ishecl such a Community
Facilities District, the appacant $hait, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building pan~its, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school
district has not formed a Ideifo-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of apl:)roval of the project And I:xior tO the recordation of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
.~/ /
/ /
/ /
SC-2/91 lo1'i2 I~!~°
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicanl and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately _acco_ _ mmoclate any and all school
i~s as a result of this project.
Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affocted water cllstrict that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 deys prior to final map approval In the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of parmits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in a__,',~_~lance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping. sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions ~ontained herein,
Development Code re~u~ions, and
Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Unltom~ Building Code and
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and tho Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
Revised site plans and building elevations incorlx)rating all Conditions of Apl:m:)vaf shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approvaf prior to ismJanco of building permits.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated 1or
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachmant,
building, etc.), or .pdp.r to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approvecl use has commenced, wfiichaver comes first.
Approval of thi~-foquest shall not waive corn with all sections of the Development
Code, all other applicable City O~linances, and ,~l:'plk;:-"l, Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Bullcling Permit ismJanco.
A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
SheriIt's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of buildbig permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, haigl~, and mathod of shielding 8o as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash rocojxacies are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for indivk:Jual units
with all receplacles shielded from public view.
2/91
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet Cily standards. The final design, locations,
and the number of trash reCel~aclas shall be su13~ct to City Planner review and aplxOval
prior to issuance of building permits. -
10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transtonTters, AC condensers, etc., shall
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination o!
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
/ /
,,/ /
/ /
/ /
_J /
/ /
/ /
/
11. Street names shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the aciopted Street Naming Policy pdor to apgroval of the final map.
12. All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan Indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval I;xfor to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to appmvai of street improvemaN and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shell not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals heva been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option ot keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to beards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
__/ /
__/ /
/ /
15. The covenants, conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incoq3~ration of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shell be recorded concurrer~/with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, wfiic~ever _o~3~s__~rs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. All pmto~vays, oben areas, andlandscaping shall be permanently maintaineel bytheproperly
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City, Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted tot City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated tor the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight ~ adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be (xmtalned in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohil:dl the casting of
shadows by vegetat~n, structures, fixfume or any other o0jeot, excapl for utlaty wires and
similar objects, puriuatlt to Development Code .S~.n 17.08.060-G-2.
/ /
/ /
18. Thep~contalnsadesignatedHistorfcal' I~-k.,~..e+-;Theaileshallbedevaiopedand __J /
malntalnedin accordance wilh ~j.,~'~b..;/. ,0o,'.~+ cd~ 1,',~,~$~ ,,~op. No. d~- c {
· Any fu.ber modtficattom to the ~e inc~u~g, but not ~tn~m~ to, extedor a~erations and/or
interior alteralone which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removalof landmark
trees, demolilion, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or stN(~ures, or chang~ to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Conmlssion review and approval.
C. Building Deelgn
1. An aitemative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units... / /
and for heating any swimming ~ or apa, unless othe~ aitema~ive energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools instaBed at the
time of initial develdgmeht shall be sugglamenled vdth ~olar heating. Delalls shell be
included in the building plans and shall be sul~'nitted for City-Planner review and apl:)roval
prior to lhe issuance of building permits.
~ 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgrm:Md with architectural / /
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sul~ect to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
SC-2/91 3of12 ~ I ~
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for .__/ /
City Planner and Building Otflc~l review and sppmvai prior to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other mot mounted edu~ment and/or __/ /
projecttone, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and commJoted to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plane.
D. Perking and Vehicular Accee~ (Indicts cle~ila on IwlMIng !)llnl)
1. All parking lot iendscal~ islands shell have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet lind shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the paddng stab (including
/ /
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be
pmvicied throughout the development to oonneot dwelllngs/untts/bu~dings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
_._/ /
3. All parking spaces shell be double stdped par City startdads and all driveway aisles,
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
/ /
All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in
depth from back of sidewaik.
The Covenants, Conottione and Restrictions sheit restrictthe storage of recmationai vehicles
on this site unless they are the principal soume of trana~rtation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor pa~.ing areas.
/ /
__/ /
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dlstrtct review and agpmvai prior to Issuance of building
permits.
/ /
E. Landscaping (for publfoly mintlined landicll;~ ~ refer to Sectloft N.)
v/ 1. Adetailadlandscap~.a~:lirrigatfonplan, ihcluding slope planting and model horns landscap-
ing in the case of reiidentlal dereton, shall he Frei:wed b~ a ,censed landscape
architect and subn~ted for Cay Planner review and eggravel Fxkxto the issusnce of bulidtng
permits or prior firml rrmp sppmvel in the case of a custom ice sulxlivtdon.
'///' 2. Existingtreasmqu~red~bo~:x~sefvec~inp~aseshat~be~X~te~tec~w~h~rm~otionberrier
in accorclance w#h the Munlcipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The iocatiMt Of those tmas to he prasewed in place and new iocations for transplanted trees
shell be ShOwn onlhe detailad lanclaca~ plans. The alX3iicant I1~1 follow all of the mtx)rlst*s
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods.
.__/ /
/ /
A minimum of trees per gross acre, comlxlsed of the foliowing sizes, shall he provided
within the IXOjeot: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36. inch box or larger,
~ % - 24- incfi box or larger, % - 15-galen, and .~ % - 5 gaBon.
/ /__
4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - ~ /_
24-inch box or larger. _
5. W'dhin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / /_
parking stalls, sufficient to shaOe 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
'/7.
v/ 9.
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less then
2:1 slope, shell be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with al:q0mpdate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by thl~ section shall include a permanent Irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or ierger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger
size shrub p~r each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-galion or larger size tree per each 250 sq. if. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall Include a pemtanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
For single family residential development, all slope planting and inigalion shall be continu-
ously maintained in a heaithy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing o~cupanoy for those units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in setlelactory
10. For multHamily residential and non-residenfiat development, proptie/owners are respon-
sible for the continual maintenance of all landacaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and delxls and maintained In a heallhy and b'Mving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11
· Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or
. This requirement shall be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimater IOade~ays, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be
included in the requiMtl ~ plans and shall be subleof to City Planner review and
approval and conglinat~J for oonalstency with any pad;way landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape realurea such as mounding, aluvlal rock, specimen size trees, meander-
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, le required along
/. /
/ /_
/ / _
/ /
/ /
__/ /
,/ /
./
SC-2/9t
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this pmjeof area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
..// 15. All walls shell be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated w~ the Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and sul~ated for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building parmits. These cdteria shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree species. -
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall he designed to consewe water through the principles o!
Xerlecape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Ranct~o Cucamonga Municipal Code.
/____/
./ /
F. S~na
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a pert of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shell
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Directory monument sign(s) shall be provide(I for apartment, condominium, or townhomes
prior to occupency and shall require separate al~iCation and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmentat
The developer shall provide each pmspecttva buyer writlen notice of the Fourth Street Rock
Cmshar project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner. I~tor to accepting a
cash deposit on any propeW.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten notice of the City Adepted
Special Stt~ies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
v// 4.
The developer shall provide each proapective buyer wdtten notice of the Foothill Freeway
project in a standam format as determeed by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
A final acoustical report shall be submitted 1or City Planner review and apl:xoval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the buik:lklg matef~al~ and construction techniques provided,
and if appropriate. verify the adequa~ of the mltlgatlon measures. The bulk:ling plans will be
checked for conformance with the mlti~n measures contained in the final refx)rt.
H. Other Agencle~
,,~/ 1. Emergertcyseco 'ndaty'a~cem shall be provide(l in _a,'c~dancewlthRanchoCucemongaFire
Protection District Standards.
v/ 2. EmergencyaccessshallbelOmVlded, malntenancelreeandciear, a minlmumof261estwide
at all times during cortstrt~ctio~ in a(xxm:tance with Rancho Cucemonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
Prior to issuance ol bullcling permits for combustiloM construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pmlaction Dlatrtct that tompomry water supply for
fire protection is evallabie, pending completion of reduired fire protection system.
The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Sewice to determire ire appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ovemeacl
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. 'l'ne final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be sul~ect to City Planner review and approval prior
. to the issuance of building pem~lt$.
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
.__/ /
/ /
For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all
supportive information, shall be o~ained from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Ol~iciat prior to tha issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANTS BHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
~. Site Development
~' 1. The applicant shall cornply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plum~ng Code, National Electric Code, and all other app#cable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adolfion Ordinance and
appl~.a3le handouts.
4.
Prior to i~uance of building permits for · new residential ctwelllng unit(s) or major addition
to existing unif(s), the a13plicant shall pay development fees at the eetabRshed rate. Such fees
may inclucle, but are not limited to: City Beeutifir. atlon Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
Prior to Issuance of building permRs for a new cormnerctal or inclustdal development or
addition to an existing development, the applicant shal pay deveiofxnent lees at the
estatglehed rate. Such fees may inclucia, but are not limited to: Systeme Deveiolxnsnt Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/pamal ~ recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Exlatlng Structurtl
1. Provide co,'~pllance with the Uniform Building Code for the pmpe~t' line clearances
2. Existing buildings shall be male to comply with corr~t building K zoning regulations for
the intended use or the building shall be demolisl~d.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be remove, filled and/or ~ to coh-~ly with the
Uniform Plurreing Cole and Uniform Building Code.
4. Underground on-site: 'UOlitle~ are to be Iocate(I arid showft on building plans sut~nittad for
building permit al:q~tton.
K. Gracllng
Grading of the sul~ect ~ shall be in ac~:xl~'dance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading standard, and aCe~l~ad grading I:Xacti~$. The final grading plan shall be in
subetantiaf eor~ormance with the al=;xovad grading plan.
A soils ~ ~ be preparad by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
perlorm such work.
The deveiofxnent is located within the soil erosion conlrol boundaries; a Soil Disturbance
Permit is required. Please toniact San Bernardino County D~artmenl of,a, grtcuRure at (714)
387-2111 for permit N~ication. Documenlation of such ~ shallbe submittad tothe City
prior to the issuance ol rough grading pem~t.
4. A geological report shall be I~epared by a qualitlad engineer or geologist and sul~nitle~t at
the time of application for grading plan check.
v'/5. The final grading plans shall be completed and al:~:~oved prior to issuance o! building permits.
/ /
.._ff /
/ /
/, /
__] /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /__
/ /
/ /
/ /__
/ /__
6. AS a custom-lit subdivision, the following requirements shall 13e met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing con~letion of all on-site
drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcms to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division prior to final map al~roval and I:X'ior to the issuance of grading permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto
or over aliacent Darcels, are to be clelineetal and racor~<l to the satisfaction of the
Building and Safety Division I~Or to Iseuence of grading and building permits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for clewateftng and protecting the subdivided
pro~rtle$, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon
any Darnel that may be su~act to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a Darnel
relative to which a bullcling permit i~ requested.
Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety
Division for alxxoval prior to i~uance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremantat or co111:)osite
e. All Slope I~ank$ in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded witl~ native grasses
or planted with ground cover for erosion control ~ com13~tion of grading or some other
aitemetive method of emilon control shall be co. Ol~tld to the set.action of the Building
Official. In acldltion a I:)efmanant irrigation system ~ be I~m~cled. This requirement
does not release the ai~licant/developer from commence with the slope planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code.
/ /
__J /
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING ONISION, ('714) B~8-1882, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L Decllcatlon end Vehicular Ac~
V'/ 1. Rignts-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior ~ streets,
community trails, pul:)lic Dasoos, public landscape arell, street treee, aml public drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Pdvate easements for nofi-t3u131ic
facilities (cmss-iot (:Iraimage, local feecIm' iraill, Itc.) ~ be reelrvecl as shown on the p~ans
and/or tentative map.
V~ 2. Dedication shall be made of the folowing dgh~-of-way on the berimete~ street~
(measured from atreet centefllne):
to eetor, Hotocco
total feet On
3. An irre~K>ca131e offer of be<~cation for .foot wt~ roadway easement shall be macle
for all Drivafe stmetl or drivel.
V'/ 4. Non-vehicular accese shall be dedicated totheCltylorthlfollowingarlets: ~?'J~/~'~.
SC-2/gt
RacilxOCal access easements shall be pmvid~ ertsufthg access to all parcels t)y CC&Rs
or 0y deeBs an<l Shall be recon:led concurrlntly with the map Or p~or to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involvecl.
8of I2
6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot ctrainage shall be provK:led and shall t3e delineated
or noted on the final map.
7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the
neigNx)dng lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language:
'Z/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the rqht to prohibit the
construction of (residential) buildings (or other struc~ras) within those areas designated
on the ~ as t)uiicli~ restr~tion areas.'
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot t. hrough the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on
the final map.
9. Easements for public sidewaits and/or street trees placed outside the pul~lc right-of-way
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach oreo pdvate property.
10. Additional street rigN-of-way shall be dedicated along ~ tum leas, to provide a minimum
of 7 feet measured from the face of cumt If cure erllacem ~Xwa~ is ~ along the right
turn lane, a parallel illeat tree maintenance easemorn $MII be IXOVtdld.
1. The developer shall make a good flail effort to IccUre the required off-~e property interests
nacassar/to (~'tstnJct the required pl~io Impmvementt and I he/she should fail to clo so,
the developer shal, at least 120 dlyl I:XIOr to Sulomittal Of the final map fo~ apFoval. enter
into an agreement to comp~te the impmverMm pu,~uam to Government Code Section
66462 at such ttme as the CRy aoquire$ the peDpeily inteftl~ required for the improvements.
Such agramere shall provide tot payrowe by Ihe ~ of all (x)~ incurred by the City
to acquire the off-site property intlmstl required in conMclJon with the m, tbdivision. Secunty
for a portion of theas costs shall be in the form of a ~ cl~ in the amount given in an
appraisal report oblained by the tier, at dives cost. The Ip~ shall have
M. Street Improvement8
V/ 1.. All pubic iml~oveml~l$ (intldor areels, dmiMge flCtlllll, ~ommur~y trait paseos,
la'~ m, ~tc.) ~ on It~ iXa~ .xl/~' I~111v~ mal~ ~111~ ¢onetmcted to
City $tlrldl~11. II"111d0r ~ i,(~ovl,,.I.1111111 IncIIgll, ~ Irt ~ lifi~lOd tO, CUe anti
gutter, AC pavemare, ~dve al~, ~dewakt mre~ li~, and ~trem tmet
2. AminimumolD6-foolwidlpiv. m,m. wilhth140doo(widlded:: 'idrigtl-of-wiyshallbe
constfuclld for all Itll-II=liott ~rNtt
3. Construct ~t felowlng padmeier ~trNI Improvements thclm:llng, !xJt not Iimlted to:
/__
/ /
--_/ /
/ /
---/ /
_.J /
/ /
/ /
ST~E:~[' NAM~ CUrB & &C. ~iDI~DI~V~ ~
.-rocce v' V' v' v"
COMM. ~ OTHER
~ ~ .
SC-2/91 9oft2 ~ <~L/
r
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will I:)e determined during plan check. (C} If so manyed, side-
wak shall be curvilinear per $TD. 304. (d) If so, manYed, an in-lieu of construct, ion fee shall
4. Improvement plans and constnJction:
Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis-
tareel Civil Engineer, shall be m. JbmiRecl to and apgmvlcl by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the ~alMfaction of the City Engineer and
the City Attorney guaranteeing cornpinion of me gulxio and/or pdvate street improve-
manIs, prior to final map apereval or the Mluance o~ building permits, whichever occurs
first.
__/ /
Prior to any work being pellOnned in public dghl-of-wly, feel ~ be paid and a
construction petra# shall be olXalnecl litre !he ely Engin~M'l Otlicl in addition to any
other permits required.
__/ /
c. Pavernenl striping, rnerking, traffic, street name lignlng, and irtemonnect conduit
shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City ErSt.
do
Signal conduit with pull boxes shin Ix installed on any new eonatnJctWn or reconstruction ._../...
of major, secondary or collictor streets which intersectw#h other major, secondary or
collecto¢ streets fo~ luture traffic ~igrmlt Pull boxee M be IXm~l on Ix~ sides of the
street al 3 feet out$ibe of BCR, ECR or any Mher k)oMionl approved t)y the City Engineer.
(1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 union 0thMWtll specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized Keel with pugro e.
Wheel M ramIx $h~11 be ir~llled o~ al lout exnet M imor/4clk)ne per City
Standaras or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. ExMling C#y roam mquktng canstraction Ihal remain open to tralfic at all times with ---/
adequatedetoumdudngmnatn~:aon. AatreMck)ejIIpmmllmaybe required. Acash
bernsit snal belm)videcl tocove, memet M grading mdpav~ng, which sheJibe
refunded upon complebon o/the conatruclJon to ~e ~' "~l.'tkm ol the City Engineer.
g. CMtClnb-';d~fiOwllhlJlno(GrOl~$~TNI. UndMlidewllkdminl SlYall be
irmaled t~ CJy sm~m~, e~ k~r ~ fan~ly ~.
h. Ha/X:IIMI) IGGell finN) deltgn ~haJl be II speciaed by tht Cly Enoineer.
i. StmetnmnesehalbeaPlXOVed~theC~Plannerpmrtoa,emiaalfmfimplancheck. --/
5. StrN! b,etOVi.,.I.d pins ;w City Stlrtdsgli/oral pftval atroMstaibel)~vicled for
review and approval I:~/tM Clly EnginN~. Phoztoany wo~belngper~,,jrlonthe
vale streets, feel M be plid and constm~ion petalill Ihll be W horn the City
Engineers Office in ack:lition to any other pennils required. _
6. Sireel lrles, a minimum ot 1S-gallon size m lal~M, ihMI be instaled per Cty St~Ylan:t$ in
accordance with tM City's street tree program.
7. Intersection line of site =esigns shall be reviewecl by the City Engineer for conlormance w~th '
adopte~ pol~-y. / /
/ /
Off colleC~)f of ~'l~f ~lfeets, lines of sight Shall 10e plotted 1of all project intersections,
including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outs~le the lines of sight.
LanclsC~l}ing and other obstructions within the lines of sight snail be approved t)y the City
Engineer.
b. Local residential s~reet intersections stroll have their noticeability imlxoved, usually by
moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on eac.~ side away from the street an~ placed in a street
tree easement.
/ /
8. A permit shall be oblained from CALTFIANS for any wod< within the loftowing dgN-ol-way:
ed. L,,o'r"A
/ /
9. All ~ imlxovements on the folk)wing streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the ---/ t
issuance of building permits:
N. PuDIic MIIrltlnlnct Arlll
V/' 1. A separme set of landscape and irrigation pL11ns per Engineering PuI=ilc Works Standards
shall be subtaMed to trm City Engineer for review and ~prc)val p~or to final n~o approval
or ism,rance ~4 bullcling permits, whichever occurs first. The logowing lindlclt)e prat(ways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into trm
Landsape Maintenance District:
J 2. A signed conser~ and waiver form to ioln and/or form the al:~l~ll~ale ~pe and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final rn~o approval or issuance of building
permits whichever _oc~__,rs fir~. ~m~tion costs ~ ~ ~ ~ tl~ c~vaioF.:r.
3. All ra<luir~lpu~iclandscapit~ Indtrdg~tion lyltlml Ihlllbt~onlinuo~mly m~intll~t~:l by the
developer until accepted ~ the City.
4. Parkway ImPoil ;%c'.r~3 on tf~ Ioilowing str#t(S) atmll (:~o~n to trm rtlult~ ol the respecUve
"'"" "'": Iq't
__/ /
/ /
O. Drainage and Fkxxl Control
The pmje¢l (or podlotto thereof) is located ~dthin a Flood H/z~rd Zone: therefore, flood
protection m#iur# Ihlll be provided u ceftilled I)y I ~l~;itl;,id Civil Engineer
ap oved by the ¢11y EnglnNr.
It shall be t~ develo0ef'$ rllponlibillty to ~ Ifm currenl FIRM
designatio~ removed from thl ~ area. Tht dlvMcplr'l ~ II~Jl We
of Map Revision (CLOMR) shill I~ ol~linld from FEMA ~ to finll ~ IDIX~vll or
=suance ol ~ik~Ing pem~s, wf~.,hev~ occurs fir~. A Letl~et M~p Rev~io~ (LOMR) s~a~l
be issued by FEMA ~ to o~cupancy or impmvlmenl accepllnct, wf~chever o~curs first.
A final drainage study shall be submitted to and apl:lwoved IDy the CNy Engineer prior to final .
map appeoval or the issuance of builcling pem-,its, whichever occurs fi~. All ~lrainage
facilities sl~aH I:)e installed as requifed by t~ Cily Engineer.
4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is requirecl for work within its rigl~t-of-way.
5. Trees am prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public ston'n drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
6. Pubitc storm drain easements shall be grade<l to convey overflows in trte event of a
blockage in a sun'q:) catch basin on the public street.
P. Ytlllti~a
V/ 1. Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanita~/sewerage system, water,
gas, electric power, telephone, and cabe TV (all underground) in a~lance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
__/ /.
/ /
.~/ /
V/ 2. The developer shall be responsible tor the ratocatiOn of existing utilities as nocessa~/. .~/ /
3. Water and sower plans shall be besigned and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cuclrv~nga Fire Protection District.
and the Environmental Health Department of tha County of Son Bernardino. A letter of
compliance from tha CCWD is re(Mired I~or to final map apGM~vai or issuance of IMrmit$,
whichaver _-~'~-Jm first.
O. Genarll Requlr~mentl Ind Al~rovai8
1. The SoDarata parcels contained within the i:wojoct boundaries shall be legally coml3inod into -'-/ /
one parcel p~or to issuance of I:)uilcling permits.
2. An easement tot a joim use driveway shall be provided IMor to finai map aOI3mval or / /
issuance of I:milcJing permits, wl~ict~ver _oco__,m first, for:
3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit stroll be posted ~ the City covering the
estimated cost of aOpodioning the ~nt~ under AS#samara District
among tha newly created parcels.
4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Mister Plan
Drainage Foes $1~it be paid ~ to final ~ aGN~ovai or I:wtor to building IMrmit issuance it
no rrla~ is irrvoIved.
$. Permits shall be olXainod from the folowing agencies for work wilttin their dg~-of-way: ~ /
6. A signad ~ IItd wilvl~ form to join Ind/or fom~ the Law Erdorcom~ftt COnVTljnity
Facilitlal ~ 8hail be Illed with the City Engineer pd0r to final ~ I~l)rovll or the
issuance el I~uikllng pem~, whichever occur~ first. Formation ~ shall be ~ Oy the
Devaio0er.
7. Prior to finalization ol any develo~'.,4~,it phase. sutfi~iem improvemere plan~ snail be com-
pleted beyond tl~ pha# boumlarlas to alsure #comla~/acc#s aml drainage protection to
t~e satisfaction of me C,y Engineer. Phase Ix~umla~ms ~al ce~re~x~x! fo lot lines shown
on me approved tentalive map.
__/ /
2/91
12 of' 12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
Apr11 I4, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~tssion
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engtneer
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14331 - LEWIS
OEVELOPM[NT - R subdivision of g5 acres of land into two parcels tn
the Office Park (OP) designation of the Terra Vista Planned
Community, located at the northeast corner of Spruce Avenue and
Foothtll Boulevard - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends
tssuance of a Negattve Declaration.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown
on Exhib(( "B"
B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 3.95 acres
Parcel 2 - 21.10 acres
Total 25.05 acres
¢. Existing Zoning:
Office Park, Terra Vista Planned Co.m.unity
D. Surrounding Land Use:
North - Vacant, approved tentative tract and park
South - Vacant
East - Vacant
West - Terra Vista Town Center
E. Surrounding General Plan and Developmmnt Code Designations:
North - Medium Residential, Terra Vista Planned Comunity
South - Industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Specific Plan
East - Mixed Use, Terra Vista Planned Con~u~ity
West - Co,,m,dnity Con~ercial, Terra Vista Planned Co,unity
ITEM
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14331
April 14, lg93
Page 2
Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes to the south at 2-3
percent with a central sump. Street improvements are in place on three
of the perimeter streets: Foothill Boulevard, Spruce Avenue, and Church
Street. Elm Avenue has been dedicated, but not improved.
ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to separate Parcel 1 for sale to
a company interested in pursuing development of a two restaurant site, as
indicated on the Master Plan (Exhibit "C"). The master plan was reviewed by
staff in July of 1992, at which time the Planning Division informed the
applicant it was sufficient for use as an exhibit with the parcel map.
Development Review will be required prior to development of either parcel or
further subdivision of Parcel 2. As part of the sales agreement, Lewis
Development intends to construct the required reciprocal access and drainage
devices within the easement on Parcel 2. Frontage parkway improvements will
be installed upon development of each parcel.
Elm Avenue will be completed between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street upon
development or further subdivision of Parcel 2. The right-of-way for Elm
Avenue has already been dedicated, including an additional 6 feet on the west
side for trail purposes as specified in the Terra Vista Community Plan.
Discussions are currently in progress regarding the question of park credit
for the various trails. Development of Parcel 2 shall comply with the Terra
Vista Park Implementation Plan, as it is finally resolved.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study.
Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial
Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of
this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate.
CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding
property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at
the site has also been completed.
RECOF~tENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all
input and elements of the Tentative Parcel )lap 14331. If after such
consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the
attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be
appropriate.
Respectful ly submitted,
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ':BAM:ly
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map
Exhibit "C" - Master Plan
Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14331, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN= 1077-421-58
AND 63
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 14331, submitted by Lewis
Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, state of California, identified as APN(s) 1077-421-58 and 63,
located at the northeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 1993, the Planning Conmmission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1= That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or public
health problems or have adverse effects on abutting
properties.
SECTION 2: This Co-,~tsaion finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970~ and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3= Tentative Parcel Map Number 14331 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditionl=
Enaineerina
Upon development of Parcel 1, inst~11 access within the easement
on Parcel 2, including a drive approach on Spruce Avenue and a
drive approach with a right turn lane on Foothill Boulevard.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14331
April 14, 1993
Page 2
The centerline of the reciprocal ingress/egress easement shall
align with the existing driveway on the west side of Spruce
Avenue.
When Elm Avenue street improvements are completed upon
develo~xaent of Parcel 2, install a traffic signal at the
Elm/Foothill intersection.
Comply with the Terra Vista Park Implementation Plan when the
Elm Avenue street improvements are completed upon develolxnent of
Parcel 2.
Buildina and Safetv
Provide a reciprocal drainage easement on Parcel 1, in favor of
Parcel 2, for construction of a private storm drain as shown on
the preliminary grading and drainage plan.
20
Prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, submit a grading plan
for the development of Parcel i or Parcel 2 separately. Show
the limits of grading, proposed drainage devices, required
easements, etc.
Prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, provide an
improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the
Developer and the City for all drainage improvements indicated
on the grading plan as approved by the Building Official.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTESTs
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Com~ission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following vote-to-wits
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOESs COMMISSIONERS=
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 14, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
VARIANCE 93-02 - SCHLOSSER FORGE - A request to reduce the required
number of parking spaces and to eliminate the requirement for one
tree to be planted every 30 lineal feet of building in conjunction
with a 23,200 square foot addition to an existing manufacturing
building in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea
9) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow
Route, west of Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-111-17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-04 - SCHLOSSER
FORGE - A request to construct a 23,200 square foot addition to an
existing manufacturing building in the Minimum Impact Heavy
Industrial District (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located south of Arrow Route, west of Rochester Avenue
APN: 229-111-17. Staff reco~ends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
BACKGROUND: When the City first entertained the idea of updating the
Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) in 1986, Schlosser Forge was concerned that
modifications to the ISP would not allow them to expand their business in the
future. Schlosser Forge's operation creates noise and vibration as part of
the manufacturing of "0" rings that might affect adjacent properties,
resulting in limitations on their business. In order to allow Schlosser Forge
to expand their business consistent with current operations, the City entered
into a 40-year Development Agreement with Schlosser Forge that would allow
them to expand their facilities in accordance with the 1981 ISP requirements
for Subarea 9. Two other metal buildings were subsequently approved and
constructed along Arrow Route.
ANALYSIS:
General: The applicant is proposing to construct a 23,200 square foot
addition to an existing metal manufacturing building. The addition will
be located towards the middle of the site in an area presently being used
for parking. The addition will be designed to match the existing
building.
Design Review Co~mittee: The Design Review Co~ittee (Melcher, Vallette,
'Coleman) reviewed the proposal and recommended approval of the addition as
submitted by the applicant. The Committee felt that changing the design
to conform to current standards would draw attention to the building
rather than blending in with the complex. Additionally, the Committee
ITEMS D & E
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 93-02 & DR 93-04 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 2
believed the intent of the Development Agreement was to allow the
applicant to construct new facilities consistent with existing metal
buildings.
Parking Variance - A total of 75 parking spaces will be eliminated with
the building addition, bringing the total number of parking spaces on-site
to 151. This number represents 326 fewer parking spaces than required by
the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP). This total reduction, however, is not
being requested with this Variance application. But rather, the reduction
has occurred over the past 5 years with parking variance approvals in 1987
and 1991. The reduction requested at this time is for the elimination of
the 75 parking spaces and the 46 parking spaces that would be required for
the building addition.
Because of the special type of machinery used by the applicant, the
business is not labor intensive and is a unique facility when compared to
other industrial companies in the City. As noted in the applicant's
letter (see Exhibit "D"), Schlosser Forge employs a total of 174 people
spread over 3 shifts. With the largest shift (days) having 129 employees,
the 151 parking spaces will be adequate to serve the company's needs.
D. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Office 16,500 1/250 66
Manufacturing 194,940 1/500 389
Warehouse 21,600 1/1000 22
Total 477 151
Landscape Variance - Under the ISP requirements, one tree is required to
be planted for every 30 lineal foot of building. With the addition, the
applicant is not proposing any landscaping, consistent with the existing
building. The landscaping would also hinder the on-site manuevering of
fork lifts and other equipment used in the business operation. In this
instance, the building addition is located towards the central portion of
the site. The addition is situated behind the heavily landscaped
streetscape and employee lunch park. Thus, visual impact from the
streetscape will be minimal. Also, the reduction in tree planting does
not imply a reduction in the minimum landscape area. With the streetscape
and lunch park, the site meets the landscape requirement for the Minimum
Impact Heavy Industrial designation.
Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist
and found no significant environmental impacts as a result of the building
addition. Therefore, the Planning Co~nission should issue a Negative
Declaration for the project.
PLANNING COM~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 93-02 & DR 93-04 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 3
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: State Law, as well as the City Development Code, give the
Planning Commission the authority to approve a variance from certain
development standards only when special circumstances apply to the project.
Also, variances may also be granted when strict enforcement of the Development
Code would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of the Ordinance.
In this case, the special type of machinery used is not labor intensive and is
a unique facility as compared to other industrial companies in the City.
Building use and design are unique in that landings are necessary on all sides
for forklift operations. The design solution effectively utilizes l0 percent
of the net site area in landscaping along the streetscape and the lunch park
to mitigate any adverse visual effects. Consequently, the plan is consistent
with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and strict interpretation
of the Code would result in unnecessary hardship. In addition, the granting
of this Variance would not be construed as a granting of a special privilege
and is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ends that the Planning Commission approve
Variance 93-02 and Development Review 93-04 through adoption of the attached
Resolutions and issue a Negative Declaration for the project.
City'Planner
BB:SM:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Elevations
Exhibit "D" - Letter from Applicant
Resolution of Approval for Variance 93-02
Resolution of Approval for Development Review 93-04
SCHLOSSER FORGE COMPANY
11711 ARROW ROUTE
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
[714} 987-4760
February 18, 1993
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Parking Variance for Construction of 160 ft.
Extension to Manufacturing Building #4
We presently have 226 marked full size parking spaces. On any
morning you will find about 105 spaces occupied, and 121 spaces
vacant. At shift change (3:00 p.m.) you will find about 119
spaces occupied, and 107 spaces vacant. We presently employ 129
people on day shift, 37 on swing, and 8 on graveyard, for a total
of 174 people. Due to improvements in efficiency we do not
expect that the proposed manufacturing building extension will
affect this number for several years.
Parking requirements per the city industrial specific plan are as
follows:
REQ,D
BUILDING USE SQ. FT. FORMULA SPACES
Bldg. #1 Mfg.
2 Mfg.
3 Whse.
4 Mfg.
5 Mfg.
6 Mfg.
Office Admin.
Proposed
Extension Mfg.
36700
68.040
21600
29000
24 000
14 000
16 500
1:500 73
1:500 136
1:1000 22
1:500 56
1:500 48
1:500 28
1:250 66
23,200 1:500 46
TOTAL 475
Construction of the extension to Building #4 will eliminate 75
spaces, resulting in a grand total of 151 marked spaces. We feel
that this number of parking spaces is adequate, and will serve us
several more years. Also, we would like to maintain our standard
space of 9' x 19' for all parking, as our policy is to allow
employees to park nearest to their work assignment, regardless of
the size of their cars.
In evaluating this request for a variance keep in mind that we
have several acres of existing paved surface, and have never had
a need for offsite parking. Should the unforeseen need ever
arise for more parking, we would simply mark off more spaces, as
our policy is never to require employees to park off the
premises. If necessary, we will pave portions of the undeveloped
land (approximately 3.5 acres). We also have available a 10 acre
undeveloped lot adjacent to and south of us.
Si. ncerely yours~,
/~e~e~ ~P. Schlosser
AJR:JPS: lus
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 93-02, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
PARKING SPACES AND TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR ONE
TREE TO BE PLANTED FOR EVERY 30 LINEAL FEET OF BUILDINGt
IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 23,200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN
EXISTING MANUFACTURING BUILDING IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 9) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED SOUTH OF ARROW
ROUTE, WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-111-17.
A. Recitals.
(i) Schlosser Forge has filed an application for the issuance of
Variance No. 93-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the
application."
(ii) On the 14th day of April 1993, the Planning Cc~m~ission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is h~reby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth An the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on April 14, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located south of Arrow
Route and west of Rochester Avenue and is presently developed with a
manufacturing complex~ and
(b) The property to the north is developed with an animal
shelter and is designated for industrial uses. ~The property to the south and
west are presently vacant and are designated for industrial uses. The
property to the east is developed with an industrial complex and is designated
for industrial uses~ and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 93-02 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 2
(c) The type of machinery used within the development is less
labor intensive than typical manufacturing operations within the industrial
area; and
(d) The total number of people employed for all shifts is 174
with the largest shift being 129 people. In that 151 parking spaces will be
provided, adequate parking will exist; and
(e) The deletion of the requirement for one tree to be planted
for every 30 lineal feet of building will not reduce the required landscape
area for the site; and
(f) The building is located towards the center of the site and
will be screened from the street by the streetscape and lunch park; and
(g) The tree planting will inhibit maneuvering of on-site
equipment, thereby disrupting the business operation.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.
(b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of
the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same
district.
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same district.
(d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other
properties classified in the same district.
(e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approvel the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 93-02 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED TBIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST=
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following vote-to-wit=
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES= COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT=
COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 93-04, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 23,200 SQUARE
FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING MANUFACTURING BUILDING IN
THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION
(SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN=
229-111-17.
A. Recitals.
(i) Schlosser Forge has filed an application for the approval of
Development Review No. 93-04 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 14th day of April 1993, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows=
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set' forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on April 14, 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spmcifically finds as follows=
(a) The application applies to property located south of Arrow
Route and west of Rochester Avenue and is presently developed with a
manufacturing complex consisting primarily of pre-engineered metal buildings~
and
(b) The property to the north is developed with an animal
shelter and is designated for industrial uses. The property to the south and
west are presently vacant and are designated for industrial uses. The
property to the east is developed with an industrial complex and is designated
for industrial uses~ and
(c) The project, with approval of the variance, will comply
with all minimum development standards of the 1981 Industrial Area Specific
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as provided for in the Development
Agreement between the applicant and the City~ and
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT /
REVIEW NO. 93-04, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 23,200 SQUARE /
FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING MANUFACTURING BUILDING IN
THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION
(SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED/
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF ROCHESTER/
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN/
229-111-17.
A. Recitals.
(i) Schlosser Forge has filed an application/for the approval of
Development Review No. 93-04 as described in the tit~ of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Develo~ent Review request is
referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 14th day of April 1993, the.Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on April 14, 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, this Co~!ssion hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located south of Arrow
Route and west of Rochester Avenue and is presently developed with a
manufacturing complex co~sisting primarily of pre-engineered metal buildings;
and
(b) The property to the north is developed with an animal
shelter and is designated for industrial usea. The property to the south and
west are presently vacant and are designated for industrial uses. The
property to the ea~t is developed with an industrial complex and is designated
for industrial uses; and
(c) The project, with approval of the variance, will comply
with all min.imum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-04 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 2
(d) The development of a 23,200 square foot manufacturing
building addition is consistent with the Heavy Industrial designation of the
General Plan; and
(e) The project is consistent with the provisions of the
existing development agreement on the property.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Conunission
during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows~
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of
the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannino Division
l)
Pursuant to provisions of California Public
Resources Code Section 21089(b), this
application shall not be operative, vested or
final, nor will building permits be issued or a
map recorded, until (1), the Notice of
Determination (NOD} regarding the associated
environmental action is filed and posted with
the Clerk of the Board of S~pervisors of the
County of San Bernardino; and (2), any and
required filing fees assessed pursuant to
California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4,
together with any required handling charges,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-04 - SCHLOSSER FORGE
April 14, 1993
Page 3
are paid to the County Clerk of the County of
San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide
the Planning Department with a stamped and
conformed copy of the Notice of Determination
together with a receipt showing that all fees
have been paid.
In the event this application is determined
exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the
provisions of the California Fish and Game
Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder,
except for payment of any required handling
charge for filing a Certificate of Fee
Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null
and void.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY=
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST=
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Convission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of April 1993, by the following vote-to-wit~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#:
SUBJECT: ~/~ ~.~ ~/~
AP~ICANT:
LOCATION:
~ose items c~ ~ ~E~m of ~val.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 98~1861, FOR COMPUANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. Time Umlto ~ ~.~-
v/ 1. Ai:~:~val shall expire, unless extended by the Plennlng Commission, if building permits are --/ /
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of al:~mval.
2. Development/Design Review shell be a13proved I:,tor to / I / /
¥/ 3. Approval of Ts,dativa Tca, J. No. ~-d"~' is granted subject to the approval of / /
4. The developer shall commonce, participate in, andconsummate or cause to be commenced.
participated in, or consummated. a Mello-Flco8 Community Facilities District (CFD} for the
Ranclx) Cucamonga Fire Profaction Distrtct to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to serve the develdG)me~. The station shait be located, designed. and built to
all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and shall become the
Distriot's proporty upon conq:)letion. The equil~)menl shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all
appficabie laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map _oc~__,rs.
SC - 2/9 i
5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / /
first, the al~)licant Shall consent to, or participate in, the ostaJMishmant of a Meilo-Roos
Community Facilities District lot the conetructJon and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the a13Gdicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation ot the
project site into the territory of Such existing District prior to tl~ recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further. if the affected school
district has not lotmeal a Meifo-Rcos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final mal:) or issuance
of building permits for said I:XOjact, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
in. acts as a result of this project.
Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to sae~e the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Suc~ letter must have been issued ~ the water
district wit bin 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, exte~r materials and colors, land~g, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
/,'V'Z::Y,,z,.~/-/~'.,~/.. Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
¢,
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction o! the City Planner.
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to
occupancy.
Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions ol Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits.
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any parmits (suci~ as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map a13pmval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commer~ed, whichever comes first.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections ol the Development
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and al:~ Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
A detailed on-site lighting plan shell be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
Shariff's Department (989-6~11) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and metlxx:l of shielding so as not to adversely
affecl adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash mceptaclas are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units
with all receptacles ~ielded from pu131ic view.
SC - 2/91
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standerde. The final design, locations,
and the nun~er of trash receptacles shall be su13iect to City_Planner review and al~roval
prior to issuance of building parmits.
10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination o!
concrete or masonry walls, barming, ancL/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner. '~:~ I~
2
Com'¢¢~.o~ Dim:
/ /
/ /
/ /
.-J /
___J /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
11. Street names shell be submitted 1or City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the adopied Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
·. 12. All building num13ers and individual units shell be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval priorto approval and reoordationof the Final Tract Map and prior
to appmvalof street improvement and grading plans. Developer shell upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restn~tions (CC&Rs) shell not prohioit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing Io hoards of directors or horneowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Re.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Arllclas of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. All pad<ways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acoeptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shell be sul~'t~ittad for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the puq:Jose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlighl across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system· The easements may be containtKI in a Declaration of Restrictions for
the subdivision which shall be reco~lad concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes flint. The easements shall pl'ohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excopl for utility wires and
similar Objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a dealgrtated Hlato~,al Landmj~ The site sitall be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Histoleic Landram1< Alteration Permit No.
· Any further modifications to the ~e including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect tbe exterior of tbe buildings or structures, removal ot landmark
trees, demolition, reiccation, reconstruction of I=ulldings or almctures, or changes to the site,
shall require a rnoditication tO the Hieto~c Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commlssiott review and approval.
C. Building Deaign
SC-2/91
An alternative energy system is required to provkle domestic hot water for all dwelling units
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming I~ols installed at the
time of initial development shall be suppMmentad with sola[ heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted tor City Planner review and approval
prior 1o the issuance of building permits.
All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural
treatment, detailing and increasad delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner
review and al:~roval pdor to issuance of building permits.
3
__/ /
_._/ /
_.J /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /__
D. Parking
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be subm~ted lot
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
and Vehicular Acce~ (Indicate demila on building plane)
1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12.inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
Textured peclestdan pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/reoreational uses.
3. All parking spaces shall be cioubla striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.
4. All units Shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are lass than 18 feet in
depth from back of sidewalk.
o
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and
Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building
pennifs.
E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained lanclm:ape are~, refer to Section N.)
A detailed landecapa and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap-
ing in the case of residetotal devetopmem, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and submitted for C~ Planner review and approval pdorto the issuance of building
permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot sulxllvlsion.
o
Existing trees required to be preeewed In place shall be I:m~ected with a construction barrier
in accorclance with the Munlctpal Code Section 19.08.110, and so nofedontbegrading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicanl shall follow all of the artx)dst's
recommendations regan:ling preservation, transplanting and trimming methods.
A minimum of trees par gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch I:x~x or larger,
__ % - 24- inch bax or larger, % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon,
A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees -
24-incfi box or larger. _
Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree tor every three
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
Com~eUon Dam:
__/ /
.__J /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
._J /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
SC - 2/91
4
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
true per 30 linear feet of building.
All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this sec!lon shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to oc_~apancy.
AII private slopes in excess of 5 feet, butlassthan8 feet invertlcalheightandot2:1 orgreater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and apProl:xlate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. if. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu-
ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the deveicper until each individual unit
is soldartdoccupledbythebuyer. Priorto mleasingoccupancyforthoseunits, aninspecticn
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they am in satisfactory
10. For multi-family residential and non-rasidemial development, property owners are respon-
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contig~Jous
planted areas within the public rignt-of-way. All landscaped areas shell be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or
· This rsquimmant shall be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, iandsca~ng, and sidewalks shall be
.included in the required lan~ plans and shall be subiect to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landacaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape lealures such as mounding, alluvial rock, si:~!cimen size trees, meander-
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is reduired along
CompLcuo~ Di~:
__/ /
/
/ /
__/
/ /
/ /
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and
al::~"oval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural
growth ct~aracteristics of the selected tree Aoecias.
__ 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of
XedSCal:~ as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancfio Cucamonga Municipal Code.
/ /
/ /
/ /
2/91
F. S~n~
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a pa~l of this approval.
Any signs propossd for this development shall com01y with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes
prior to occupancy and shall require separate aDplication and al~roval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of me Fourth Street Rock
Crasher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any properly.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault. in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each pm~oective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway
project in a stanclard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accelXing a cash
deposit on any property.
A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final repro1 shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to balow 45 CNEL, the building mate~ais and construction tachniques provided,
and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation meesums. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencl~
Emergency secondary access shall be provided in - -a~on:lancewith Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District Slandarde.
Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
Prior to issuance of building permits for cont~ustibM construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucarnonga Rm Prataction District that temporary water supply for
fire protection is available, ;ending complation of required lire protection system.
4. The al:~icam shall contact ~ U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. MuitHamity residential developments shell provide a sulld overtmad
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead shucture shall be sublact to City Ptannar review and approval prior
to the issuance of building I:)effT~itS.
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptal3ility, including all
supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Pennifs. and prior to issuance of building permits.
.
SC - 2/91
APPLIGANT~ SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 089-18~3, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
· Site Development
v/ 1. The applicant shatl comply with the latest edopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other apf)licat31e codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at tfie time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption On:finance and
ap91icabla bandouts.
Prior to iesuanoe of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition
to existing unit(s), the ~ shall pay develdpment lees at the established rate. Such lees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beeutlfication Fee, Pad< Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
Pdor to issuance of bullcling permRs for a new commercial or industrial development or
addRion to an existing cleveiopment, the apltgicant shall pay development lees at the
esta1311shed rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Chectdng Fees.
4. Street addresses shall be provided bythe Building Official, altertract/parcel map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structurll
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Builtling Code for the propedy line claarances
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
K. Grading
Existing buildings shall be made to cx)rnl~y with (x)rrect building and zoning regulations for
the intended use or the building sMII be demolished.
Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, fiEed and/or capped to comply with the
Uniform Plurnbing Code and Uniform Building Code.
Unclergrouml on-site utililles are to be located and show~ on building plans submiRed lot
building pema application.
Grading of the subloci ~ shall be in accordance w#h Ihe Un#o,Tn Building Code, City
Grading Standard, and ac~gte4 grading practi~et The final grading plan shall be in
A soils repod shall be I~'epared by a qua#tied engineer licensed ~ the State of California to
perform such wMk.
The develofxnent is located within the soil erosion control I=oundmles; a Soil Disturbance
Permit is required. Pleaee contact San Blmall:llno Courtly I~ll~ 11~,~., d of Ag~:=uiture at (714)
387-2111 for permit application. DocumMltatlon of such petra# ~ be submitted to the City
,pdor to the issuance o! rough grading permil. _
A geological report shall be Ixel:)ared by a qua#lied engineer or geologist and SUI~TtiRed at
the time of al~lication for grading plan che~.
SC - 2/91
o
The final grading plans shall be comiCted and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
?
Proicct No. '.Z~
__/ /
/ /
__/ /
._J /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
._.J /
__/ /
6. As a custom-lot subd~ision, the following requirements shall be met:
Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site
drainage facilities nscessaW for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading parmits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto
or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to lhe satisfaction of the
Building and Safety Division prior to Issuerice of grading and building parmits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided
properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building patmils for construction upon
any parcel tha! may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a pamel
relative to which a building pam'~it is requested.
Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety
Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis.)
All siopa banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses
or planted with ground cover tor erosion control upon completion of grading or some other
aitemative methnd of erosion control shall be compleled to the satlef~tion of the Building
Official. In add#ion a permanent Irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement
does not release the apl:Mioant/developer from comiCante with the sio~e planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code.
Collier, on Date:
/ /
.__/ /
/ /
_.J /
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 9~-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
t_ O~cll~tlon mini V~hloulmr ~
Rights-of-way and easements shag be dadioaed to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails, public peseos, public lends, ape areas, street trees, and public drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Pdv~te easements for non-public
facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be rese~ as shown on the plans
ancVor tentative map.
Dedication $1~11 be ftmcle of the following rtgN$-of-w~y on ~e perim~er sireels
(measured from stM centedine):
totaJ feet on AZ~v,~/~ ,4 /~/'/4,~'~'~'/~/~/,~4/~
total feet on
tofal feet on
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for
for all prtvm streets or d~ves.
-foot wide ro~dwly easement shall be made
/ /
SC - 2/91
5. Reciprocal a~cess easemeres shah be provided ensurtng access to all I:mrcele by CC&Rs
or by deeds and shall be recorclecl concurrently w#h ~1~ map or prior to ~he issuance of
building parmits, where no rn~p is involved.
6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated
or noted on the final map.
7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the
naightx)ring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain tbe following language:
'YWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the
constnJc#on of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated
on the map as building restriction areas.'
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lit through the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on
the final map.
9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of.way
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto pdvete property.
10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right
turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
11. The developer shall make a goocl faith effort to acquire the required off-site properly ~terests
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and If he/she should fall to do so,
the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the impmvemants pursuant to Govemmant Code Section
66462 at such time as the City acquires the property imerest~ required forthe improvements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City
to a~uire the off-site property interests required in connectionwith the subdivision. Security
for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at devefopa~s cost. The appraiser shall have
been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
M. Street Improvement~
o
All public impmvemants (interior streets, drainage facitilles, community trails, paseos,
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plato and/or tentative map shall be constructed to
City Standards. Interior street impmveman~ 8heit Include, but are not limited to, curb and
gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, siclewalcs, street ligl~, and street trees.
A minimum of 26- foot wide pavemarl, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated flgtl-of-way shall be
constnJcted for all hall-section streets.
__/ /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
._/ /
STR~E:T NAM~ CURB & A.C. SIDE: DRIVE =i'~E:~'T =~t~.,~ COMM. k~.,D[A~ OTHE:R
OLri,-F.;R PVMT WAJ,K Au~<. LJOi.rt~ ~ TRAIt, ~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 14, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~ission
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-03 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE PARTNERS - A
request to construct approximately 88,000 square feet of retail
space within a previously approved commercial retail center in the
Regional Related Commercial designation (Subarea 4) of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, located south of Foothill Boulevard, east
of 1-15 - APN: 229-031-41.
ABSTRACT: This item is the detailed review of the western phase for the
Foothill Marketplace shopping center.
BACKGROUND: On August 21, 1991, the City Council approved the Master Plan for
Foothill Marketplace, a 62-acre commercial center, and the site plan and
building elevations for Price Club. Conditions of Approval required various
it~m~ to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Comission prior to the
issuance of building permits. These items include architectural details to
establish the theme for the center, phasing of the development, integral
public art, and a uniform sign program.
Leading up to and following approval, the Planning Co~ission conducted a
number of workshops to review architectural details for the center. These
elements included the cornice treatment, wainscoat treatment, transitional
tower designs, hardscape treatment, pre-cast bollards and plant pots, etc.
Some of these elements were found to be favorable by the Commission but other
items remained outstanding. At that time, the applicant did not have many of
the proposed tenants signed for the other phases of the project. As a result,
the applicant decided to wait until further commitments had been obtained
before preceding with the conceptual plans for future phases.
On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the plans for the
131,451 square foot Wal-Mart building. This building proposed many of the
elements previously considered by the Commission (i.e., cornice, wainscoat,
etc.). Both Price Club and Wal-Mart are now open for business. On
February 24, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the plans for
approximately 161,000 square feet of retail space within the eastern phase.
The approval included one major tenant, three intermediate tenants, and
in-line shop buildings connecting the major and intermediate tenants.
ITEM F
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 93-03 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS
April 14, 1993
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
General: The applicant is now proposing to develop the majority of the
western phase of Foothill Marketplace. The application consists of two
major tenants (33,000 and 36,000 square feet) and 20,590 square feet of
shop building space connecting the major tenants. The majority of the
parking area will be constructed with the application. Only the small
areas adjacent to the free-standing pads will remain undeveloped until
construction of the pad buildings.
Planning Co~ission Workshop/Design Review Co~nittee: On February 10,
1993, the Planning Co~mission conducted a special workshop to review the
design of the western phase of Foothill Marketplace. Because it was not
certain if Circuit City would be occupying the pad identified on the
plans, discussion regarding the design of the building was deferred until
a specific design submittal is pursued by the applicant. Therefore, the
main focus of the Commission centered on the site plan, specifically,
parking allocation and circulation. The Commission was initially
concerned about the large number of parking spaces provided at the rear of
the Sports Chalet. After discussing the issue, the Commission determined
that because of the unusual site configuration, the parking was acceptable
provided the landscaping in the rear area was limited to groundcover, low
shrubs, and trees to allow visibility into the area.
In considering the original circulation pattern, (see Exhibit "B"), the
Commission felt that the terminus of the collector road provided awkward
turning movements and should be re-evaluated. The applicant provided a
revised parking layout (see Exhibit "C") that was reviewed by the Design
Review Committee. The Committee (Melcher, Vallette, Coleman) expressed
concern about the angled aisles connecting to the collector road. They
suggested the applicant explore other options to minimize the potential
conflicts. In re-considering the parking layout, however, the applicant
and staff feel that the design offers desirable features. Orienting the
drive aisles towards the major tenant (i.e., Sports Chalet) is preferable
to maintain clear pedestrian access to the business. The continuation of
the collector road provides a better terminus at the buildings by curving
across the storefronts. Additionally, the angled aisles proposed are
similar to those used in front of Montgomery Wards at Town Center and
other smaller centers. For these reasons, staff has included this
circulation pattern for the Commission's consideration. If the Commission
determines that the design is not acceptable, staff recommends that the
parking lot design be referred to the Design Review Committee for
additional study.
Other issues discussed by the Commission during the workshop included:
The use of decorative paving, landscaping, decorative light fixtures,
and a focal element at Pad 10 provides a sufficient connection from
Wal-Mart.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 93-03 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS
April 14, 1993
Page 3
The loading space location for Circuit City will be discussed in more
detail when the design for Circuit City is finalized and submitted
for review.
3. Minor variation should be provided in the storefront design. The
variation could include angles being provided at the double doors.
The tower element at the southwest corner of Sports Chalet be
completed and returned similar to other towers approved in the
center.
5. The simple cornice design should be replaced with the pre-cast
element.
6. The arches within the arcade area should be designed to rest on a
column.
These comments have been incorporated into the plans or into the Resolution as
conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Development Review 93-03 through adoption of the attached Resolution.
BB:SM:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Overall Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Original Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Revised Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Roof/Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval
Z
~,'
F~
o~0
0~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 93-03, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY
88,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE WITHIN A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER IN THE REGIONAL RELATED
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION (SUBA~EA 4} OF THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, EAST OF 1-15, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN= 229-031-41.
A. Recitals.
(i) Foothill Marketplace Partners has filed an application for the
approval of Development Review No. 93-03 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 14th day of April 1993, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on April 14, 1993, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application
Foothill Boulevard and east of 1-15.
and
applies to property located south of
The property is presently rough graded;
(b) The property to the north is designated for commercial use
and is developed with a church. The property to the south is designated for
industrial use and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for
commercial use and is developed with a Wal-Mart facility. The property to the
west is designated for and developed with a freeway; and
(c) The development of the retail_buildings is consistent with
the Regional Related Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-03 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE
April 14, 1993
Page 2
(d) The application, with the attached Conditions of Approval,
will comply with all applicable standards of the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan and the Development Code.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives
of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of
the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby finds a Negative
Declaration was issued on August 21, 1991.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannino Commission
1)
All applicable conditions contained in Resolution
Nos. 91-86A and 91-87, approving the Conditional Use
Permit 90-37 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724,
shall apply.
2) Decorative paving, landscaping, decorative light
fixtures, and a focal element shall be provided as a
connection between Wal-Mart and the western phase.
The final plans shall be revised and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
3) The tower element at the southwest corner of Sports
Chalet shall be completed and returned similar to
other towers approved in the center. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to the issuance of building permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 93-03 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE
April 14, 1993
Page 3
4)
The pre-cast cornice element shall be used in all
locations instead of the simple cornice design. The
final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
5)
The arches within the arcade area shall be designed
to rest on a column. The final plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to
the issuance of building permits.
6)
Landscaping within the southwest parking area shall
be limited to trees, groundcover, and low shrubs
subject to review and approval by the City Planner
prior to building permit issuance.
7)
If Circuit City is not developed concurrently with
the balance of the western phase, decorative fencing
shall be provided to section off the pad area from
the balance of the site. The final design shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to
the issuance of building permits for any building
within the western phase.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of April 1993 , by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES=
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOC^T,ON:
Those items checked are Conditions of .a~:xoval.
APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 98~.1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. Time Llmlte ca~,,a~m
1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are .--J /.-
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months lrom the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shell be approved prior to / / / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted sul~ect to the approval of / /
SC - 2/91.
4. The deveioper shall commenoe, pe~tlcipate In, and consummate or cause to be commenced,
pa~licipated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) 1or the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection ~ to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to sswe the develol=ment. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
District's propo~ty upon cornplelk)n. The equi!3ment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map
5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/ /
first, the aP131icant shell consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos
Community Facilities District lot the construction and maintenance of necessan/school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, conse_nt to the annexation of the
project site into the territo~/of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance o! building permits, whichever comes lirst. Further, if the affected school
district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deerned null and void.
Co,nuie,'im'm D~e:
This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
impacts as a result of this project.
o
Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to linal map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
_._/ /
B. Site Development
The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
irmlude site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, tha conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and ,~ip/~//Z~
~U~P'~ Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
/ /
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction ot the C~y Planner.
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of ApWoval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits.
,/
All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (~ucfi as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lit subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichaver comes first.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Devaiopment
Code, all other applicable Cily On~nances, and applicat~ Community Plans or Spacific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
Sbertlf's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent propenias.
__/ /
/ /
8. If no centralized trash recelXaClas are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units
with all racel~acias shielded from public view.
2/91
~
Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations,
and the number of trash receptacles shall be sut~act to Cllyplanner review and approval
prior to issuance of building parmits.
10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall
be ficated out ol public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, barming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
2FI
11. Street names shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the adopied Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building numt~ers and individual units shall be identitlsd in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shell upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14.
The Covenants, Conditions and Rest~tions (CC&Rs) shell not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in sul:<livlsions shall have the ol~ion ot keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to Ix)an:Is of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incoq)oration of the
Homeowners' Association are sul:~ect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shell be recorded concurtenth/with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whicfiever _oc~__,rs first. A recorded copy shell be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. Allparkways, open areas, andlandacaping shell be permanently maintaineq by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptabla to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shell be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements Shell be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adlacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system· The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions tor
the sutX:llvision which shell be recorded concurrently with the recordation ol the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting o!
shadows by vegetation, stnJcturse, fixturse or any other object, excepl lot utility wires and
similar o~s, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060.G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shell be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmad< Aleration Permit No.
· Any further moditicatione to the site includittg, but not limited to, exte~or alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buMings or structures, ramoval of landmark
trees, demolition, reiocatiott, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission rev~ and ar~xoval.
C. Bull~llng
1.
SC - 2/9 ]
Design
An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternaive energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented w-tiff solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment su~act to City Planner
review and aiNuroyal prior to issuance of building permits.
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
___/ /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted 1or
City Planner and Building Official review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits.
4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shell be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constnJcted to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Acceee (Indicate dillill on building plane)
v/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shell have a minimum outside dimension of 6 leet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including CUlt)).
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement armas circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwelling~unitWbulldtnga with open spaces~
plazas/recTeational uses.
All parking spaces shall be double striped par City standards and all driveway aisles,
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standerda.
All units shall be provided with garage door openers ff driveways are less than 18 teat in
depth from back of sidewalk.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shell restrict the storage of recreational vehicles
on thiS site unless they are the principal source of transpo~latibn lor the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor pa~',ing areas.
Plans for any security gates shell be ajbmitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approvall:xtor to issuance of building
permits.
E. Landscaping (for publicly maintithed lindacape areal, refer to Section N.)
v/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and rn(xlei home landscap-
ing in the case of residential develol3ment, Shall be preper~ by a lioenMcl lancisca13e
architect and submitted for Cly Planner review and al~)roval pdorto the issuance of building
permits or prior final map a131:lroveJ in the caee of e cullom IM lutxtivieion.
Existing trees required to be preeewed in place shall Ix IX(Xecled with a constlUCtion barrier
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those tre~ to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detaile I landecapa plans. The applVAnt shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming mathode.
A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided
within the project: %. 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gaJlon, and ~ % - 5 gallon.
A minimum of ~Z) % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees -
24-inch box or larger.
Within parking lots, trees shell be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
Proi~;t No.: ~,~
Com~lc~c~ Date:
__J /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
__J /
_J /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
__/ /
/
SC - 2/9 1 4
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreater slope, but less than
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
Allprivate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 orgreater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their ap13eerance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or large r
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and apPmphete ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shell include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shell be continu-
ously rnaJntalned in a healthy and thriving condition by the develofier until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing cocupancy for those units, an inspection
shell be conducled by the Planning Division to datermine that they are in satisfactory
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property ownera are respun-
sibte for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way, NI landscaped areas shell be kelX free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condRion, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11
· Front yard landscaping shell be required per the Developmare Code and/or
· Thia requiremaN shall be in addffion to the required
street trees and slope planling.
12. The final design of the perimater parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shell be
included in the required lanc~ plan~ and shall be sut~ to City Planner review and
aP13roval and coo~linated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, sl:~.,imen size trees, meander-
ing sidewalks (with horizohtal change), arid blterlslllad LI~, is roquirocl along
Com~e~oe Dam:
/. /
_..J /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /__
/ /
,,/
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be instalisd within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
15. All walls shell be provided with decorative treatment. ff located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with tim Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance criteria shell be developed and subre#ted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. These cr#erla shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree sl~acias.
~ 17. Landsca13ing and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the princi131es of
Xeriscape as defined in ChalXar 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mun'~pal Code.
/ /
/ /
/ /
SC - 2/91
F. $1gnl
/
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shell be submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Directory monument sign(s) shell be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhemes
prior to occupancy and shall require separate al~lication and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building palmits.
G. Environmental
The developer shell provide eash prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock
Crusher project in a standard fom~at as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted
Special S!udies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway
project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to acceding a cash
deposit on any property.
A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building parmits. The final report shell discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building matedale and construction technlquas provided,
and if appro~tate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencle~
V/ 1.. Emergency secondary access sl~all be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District Standards.
v'/ 2.
v/ 4.
Emergency access shell be provided, maintenance lree axl clear, a minimum o126 feet wide
at all limes during construction in accordance with Ranclx) Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shell be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District thet tempora~ water supply for
fire protection is available, pending completion of re(Nir~ fire protection system.
The applicant shell contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the aPlXOpriate type and
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ove~ead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final Iocatic~ of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building pain,its. _
Proiect
/ /
._./ /
/ /
/ /
___/ /
__/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all
supportive information, shell be oblained from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environrnenfal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
.. Site Development
1. The applicant shall cornply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plumbing ~, National Electric Code, and all other aliicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applicable handouts.
,/
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelHng unit(s) or major a0clifion
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the establlsbed rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Pink Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees.
o
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or Industrial development or
addition to an existing development, the aliicant shell pay deveiopment fees at the
estat~tished rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Chectdng Fees.
4. Street addresses sitall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcol map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structure.
/ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the propew line clearances
considering use, area, and fire-ree~ivene~s of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shell be ~ to coml:dy with correct building and zoning regulations for
the intended use orthe building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities ahall be removed, filled and/or ca~ to com;ly with the
Uniform Plumping Code anl:l Uniform Building Co~e.
4. Undergmuncl on-site ulilllal Irl tO be lOtalii and ~ Oil build#lg plans ;ul~m~ed for
building permit apl~ication.
K. Grading
V/ 1.
,/
Grading ot the ~ub/~ pro~ shall be in acoordance wfih the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accel;lad grading practices. The Iinal grading plan shall be in
sul~landal con~ormanm wilh the aplxoved grading plan.
2. A soils relx~t shell be prepared by a qualified engineer llcer'-,~ed by the State of California to
perform such
3. The development is located within the soil erosion conlrol boundaries; a Soil Diatu~bance
Pen,nit is required. Please contact San Bemarcllno Courtly Depattme~ of Agriculture at (714)
387-2111 for pem~t application. Documentation of such perm[t shall be sul~mitted to the City
pmr to the issuance o! rough gr ing perre#. _
__ 4. A geological refx)rt shall be IXepared by a qualitiad englneer or geologist and submitte(I at
the time of al~lication for grading plan check.
5. The final grading plans shall be com;leted and alNxoved prior to issuance of building permits.
/ /
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
,x
/ ,,. L__
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 14, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Brad Buller, City Planner
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
EVALUATION AND COMMENT ON PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR A NEW HIGH
SCHOOL SITE IN ETIWANDA - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
- Pursuant to State Law (Public Resources Section 21151.2), the
School District requests that the Planning Commission comment on a
proposed 53 acre high school site, located at the northeast corner
of Highland and East Avenues - APN: 225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and
20.
ABSTRACT: This report provides general information about the proposed high
school site and identifies the major concerns and potential problems with the
site. The Commission will be asked to make recommendations to the Chaffey
Joint Union High School District at the Commission's April 28, 1993 meeting.
BACKGROUND: On March 31, 1993, the Planning Division received written
notification from Chaffey Joint Union High School District of its intent to
acquire a site in Etiwanda for a future high school. State Law (Public
Resources Section 21151.2) requires school districts to notify the Planning
Commission before acquiring property for a new school site. The City does not
have jurisdiction over approval or denial of the site selection, but the
Planning Commission is authorized to submit recommendations to the school
district for its consideration. Such recomx~endations should be made within 30
days. Following receipt of the City's recommendation, the final decision on
the acquisition is made by the school district governing board.
The most recent development proposal for this site was for a 122 unit single
family subdivision (Tentative' Tract No. 14550), which was withdrawn by the
applicant early in 1991.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
ae
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North- Single family residences, vacant land, Etiwanda Specific Plan;
Very Low Residential
South- Vacant land, Future Route 30 Freeway; Very Low Residential
East - Vacant land, Etiwanda Specific Plan; Very Low Residential and
Open Space
West - Single family residences, telephone substation, vacant land,
East Avenue and Etiwanda Specific Plan; Very Low Residential
ITEM G j
PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT
CHAFFEY HIGH SCHOOL
April 14, 1993
Page 2
General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Very Low Residential
North -Very Low Residential
South -Freeway
East -Very Low Residential and Flood Control
West -Very Low Residential
Site Characteristics: The site consists of over 53 acres bordering the
north side of the future Route 30 Freeway. It is roughly divided in half
with the western portion relatively flat with about a 2 percent downward
gradient toward the south. The eastern portion which is within the
Etiwanda Creek flood plain, is about 8 feet lower in elevation than the
western portion, and slopes gently towards the southeast. Vegetation
consists predominately of native grasses with three significant Eucalyptus
windrows on the western portion, and alluvial fan scrub plant association
in the eastern portion.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS: Because of the recent notification date and rather short
review period, this report contains only brief initial comments in those areas
which have been completed as of the agenda packet preparation. The more
specific comments will be presented at the April 28, 1993 meeting.
Conformance with the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan - The
proposed school use is not in conformance with the General Plan nor
Etiwanda Specific Plan. Both documents identify location of existing and
proposed schools in the area. The General Plan Technical Update was
adopted in 1988 and amended in 1991 with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan
and reflects the proposed locations of schools within the community, as
was provided by the various school districts at that time. The high
school district had not previously indicated to the City the need for a
high school at this site nor in the general area. The use of this site
for a major school facility raises significant questions which were
obviously not considered during the 1988 or 1991 General Plan Amendments.
B. Site Constraints - The site presents numerous problems to development
which include the following:
The eastern portion (near half) of the site is within the Etiwanda Creek
flood plain and the western portion is governed by the Etiwanda/San
Sevaine Drainage Policy. This site should be reviewed for storm drainage,
fire hazard, scrub/sage habitat and endangered species issues which are
typical of this type of land form.
Route 30 Freeway plans will present potential impacts to the development
of the site. Frontage roads and overpass design will affect site
development and impacts to the site from freeway traffic (noise and
pollution) must be addressed.
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
CHAFFEY HIGH SCHOOL
April 14, 1993
Page 3
Land Use Compatibility - The site is bordered on three sides by vacant
single family residential land. High schools and their associated
activities can present impacts to the surrounding area that one does not
generally expect from elementary and middle schools. These impacts
include, but are not limited to:
Increased vehicular traffic and parking demands due to student
drivers and attendance at school activities.
Increased noise and lighting glare due to after school activities
(athletic events, band practices, etc.)
In addition, the relatively close proximity of this site to other high
schools does not appear to balance high school campuses within our
community. Evaluation of potential impacts of having two high schools
within a 1/2 mile of each other needs to be addressed.
RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to continue the detailed analysis in the areas
listed in this report, and with any other issues of concern to the Planning
Comission, for presentation at the April 28, 1993 meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:AW:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - School District Notification, March 30, 1993
Exhibit "B" - General Plan Land Use Map, Etiwanda
Exhibit "C" - Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map
?
Chaffey Joint Union High.Schoo! District
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO~ ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT BOARD MEMBERS ~
Dean E Smother~ INSTRUCTION Kathy E. Kinley ~
· Betle B. Harrison Birt C, Martin '~
Raymond J. Sarrio
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ...... ~rr.!o ~
PERSONNEl. unanes J. una.ey
Donald E. Culp Michael J. Wolf
March 30, 1993
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Charley Joint Union High School District is considering
the purchase of a 53 acre parcel of land at the northeast
corner of Highland and East Avenue, to be used for a
future high school site. Public Resources Code Section
21151.2 requires that we solicit comments from the
Planning Commission regarding this use of the site, A
site plan draft is attached for your convenience.
We would appreciate yo6r review and comments by May 1,
1993. A copy must be included in our application for
approval by the California Department of Education.
Thank you for your' assistance.
Sincerely,
Susan B. Sundell, Ed.D.
Director, Business Services
Art&client
Exhibit 'A'
SCHOOLS: ALTA LOMA · CHAFFEY ADULT EDUCATION · CHAFFEY · ETIWANDA * MONTCLAIR · ONTARIO · RANCHO CUCAMONGA.!_VAJ. I EY VIEW
.i~ ~. --~i,~..,.,:.k......, .....;,;.. ,.~ ... ~::~ .--~-~-~ .... ~~:~_-~-
~::::" "-~ ...............................:... ' - . .... :: ::::::: O ~_.~__.'
· ~ -o %--~ ......... : ::::;;:::;;;::::.,, ~-. --.--._~__---._~_.~. ~ ..............
.__.....~. ~;~ ,-~::::::;: ~ .... ~.~~ ::: .~_~____~___.~.:::::::::::: i~_Z_Z~_~
..,, .... : r.,..~ · · · ." ........ . .... : · ..... . .... ~..,_--~..,.--~.~. .....................
.....t~-~:::.:::::::"~!.. '.':.:!!!iii .':::':.------=-=-=-~!iii :r
..... ~ · . ............. . ..... · .... .:::::: ._-__---_--_.~ ...........::::.::: :.: %%-..:
, ,~.::: :::::: :...~-"'- ......' :: i:'~ iiiii i ..........-.= ..................i:.';~___
· _ ..... . .,,,~44a .. . -.'-' '~_~ ........~- - -
..... ~-~ '"- t-v~ · ~ ~' I a,-,,-~,,.---'~· ',, .....
' .... -' "" .... '" ....'---'
'" · · · I 1 i ..... · ~ ......
..... . : ......
.... ; ~/ / ~::::::::: -'~Z~-:.,: ;\~;:;:; .....:-Z~-.'
~ ' ' ' · h ::::::::::: ......~-'----~ .............. 4'-'"-"'
-, ·, ~1 ¢. ...... . ...........-=.-..:~ ......
· .. ~! ~ ...,.~,¢ :::::::::::.~ ,. . :.. -
~ ....I~,... I ....- ...........---, ....
'"-.- I ~" ' . .......... ~-- ....
--':'" I~11 IIII I ~- :::::::::::;..x:
~i..2: ~,~~1~-/I ...............~ .~_.-2.~._...~__-___~~ __~__:___~;_.-./,
.'. :-' ~~.# ~ ~~, I · J',-i ~ .........::: ::' -,..~4.~.-_-~-z----z-.-
:~::::::::I :::i:::::::: ....... .~, ~il'I~II~ ~. ,-;~¥_~'~'w~ .- ~.~.~.,.~,.,/~
,o-' :: :.'::
........... :-.:..:..;::.;:: ,,ooo,o,, --,, ~-
· ~'.' ........................ m--.--. ~' .~.i: .... //¢
· ========================= ,,,,,,,, ' ' ~ ~I.'.'.'.'.'.
.... .:1::...:::: , - .,~
',:~I--i..~:::::::: ~ ,,:::::::::: .......... ...%~.~.~.~.~.~ I~~//~
~".'.[,~ -~&~A4~ ~''" ........., ~,,,,-,u,_ ,.,,,~1
[".~]i:~' ~ ~:.;L"$';';v.'.'-"°:'.il!!!!11tt!111111!~l [~//,~''
C~ OF ~CHO CUC~ONGA
1-14 OU~AG
~ MAlTIN iq~N ~
figure
5-1
ITEM:Pmm~ High School Site - Etiw~nd~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~----
Trrl.!=.: Edwanda Sl~Cific PIm M,~
C4-' r~ EX]4THIT: "C" SCALE:
Date: April 14, 1993
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
To:
Planning Commissioners
From: Joe O'Nefi, City Engineer
Mike Ollvter, Senior Civil Engineer
SubJect~ Fiscal Year 1993/94 Englneermg's Capital Improvement Projects
Attached is the Executive Summary of Engineering Department's FY 1993/94 Capital
Improvement Projects Budget. The summary outhnes the capital projects, the funded
activity, the budgeted amount for each project, and the funding source{s}. The projects
are categorized by the funded activity of each project. Those activities being:
Design .............................................These projects generally have their initial funding
in this year. The majority of the design of these
projects will occur during this year.
Complete Design .............................Funding for design usually occurred in the
previous year. These projects are of such a priority
that as soon as funds become available, whether
through the normal accumulation of typical
funding sources or through special grants, these
projects will be ready to construct.
Design & Construction ...................These projects will be designed and constructed,
either in their entirety or the initial portions of
the project, within the fiscal.
Construction ...................................Design is complete or construction was
c6mmenced in a previous year for these projects.
Construction Administration ....... This funding can also be considered as "clean-up"
work on a project. The construction has been
completed, or funding for construction occurred in
the previous year, and only funds for work such as
soil testing, survey work, or special inspection is
required.
Reimbursements .............................These are programs for which developers,who have
agreements with the City, will be reimbursed for
their costs associated with the construction of City
master planned facilities.
Right-of-Way Acquisition .............. This funds only the acquisition of right-of-way.
Usually design is complete and construction
{which is programmed for funding in a subsequent
year) can not commence until this activity is
completed.
Study ...............................................These are special studies which are usually not
directly related to a construction project.
Also included is a breakdown of the funding sources an~i the percent allocation to the
capital budget with a similar breakdown by project activity and project type. Lastly is
an exhibit identifying capital project location.
ITEM H
One consequence of the reduction of development within the City is a corresponding
decline in the amount of development fees which the City takes in. Beautification.
Transportation, General City Drainage and Etiwanda Drainage Fees have in the past
been used to fund Engineering's capital projects. These fees have declined to a fraction
of what was being received during the mid '80's. However, to help offset this reduction is
an increase in gas tax revenues resulting from the passage of State Proposition 111 and
the County's Measure I. Measure I is a major source of funds for the improvement of
Haven Avenue.
A second reduction to the Clty's capital funding sources is to the Clty's Transportation
Development Act (TDA) Article 8 allocation. This fund has primarily been used to fund
new signal installation. It has been cut significantly due to the Omnitrans/Cities
funding agreement. This agreement pe~'~lts Omnitrans to appropriate TDA Article 8
money as needed with the remainder being allocated to the Cities. Omnitrans will be
replacing older buses in addition to purchasing new buses to accommodate its
expansion policies. While we do not anticipate any revenue from this source in this. or
subsequent years, the City is carrying over from prior years a retained fund balance of
TDA Article 8 monies which will go towards the installation of traffic signals in
various locations throughout the City.
WJO/ws
attachments
Fiscal Year 1993/94
Capital Improvement
Projects
Executive Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~COMI~U'NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEEl~1~IG/PUBLIC WORKS/MAINTENANCE
Projects By Activity
- Construction Admin.(O.04%)
P.~mburs~nen~02%)
Right-of-Way AcquisitionO
D~ign & Cornstraction(S7.0%)
StudiO0.1%)
Salaries and Operatiom(S.STo)
De~ign(O.~%)
Complet~ Design(0.1%)
Projects By Type
Traffic(4.7'/.)
Salaries and Opet'ations(5.5%)
t~ P~ms(oa%)
RatL, oad~O~%)
Funding Sources
CDBC,(0~%)
Assessment District(l.6%)
Rule 20A & Trust Accts.(20.9%)
RDA0~.8% )
SB 140(2.6%)
M~asur~ I(20.7%)
Fundirtg Sources
IST~(17.~)
O~r Agencies(1.3%)
Special Gnn~(0.8%)
Gas Tax(4.2%)
Prop. 111(7.0%)
TDA A~
TDA ~ ~(o.4%)
£tiw~mda Drainage(0.1%)
B~autifimtion(0.4%)
General Cid/Drah~age(0$%)
Project~ by Activity
Duisn
CompleU De~fn Slg,0G0
DmiSn & Coremlotion S11,997,730
Co~f~uct*~ S5,300,,S80
Commaion Adm~ $9,000
RJsht. c~-W~y Acquisition
Sdmbl ind OpeutJcxu S1,LS5,430
To~l
Projec'~ by Type
lvbme~ 1~
T,~f'~.
S236,~00
S28:L140
S120,f~0
S18,248,1S0
S~87,~20
Sl,lS~A30
S:2LO~ ~K~S40
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 14, 1993
TO~/~~irman and Members of the Planning Commission
F~~Brad Buller, City Planner
~Y: -- Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: TRANSITION OF DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
This memo is intended to facilitate Commission discussion on this item
by providing copies of existing standards and guidelines for proper
transition of density. As you can see from the attached excerpts from
the Development Code and planned community texts, there is a wealth of
regulation addressing this important site planning issue.
Two approaches are evident: 1) definitive, objective standards, such as
increased setback and height restrictions at property line, and 2)
general "good neighbor" policy statements regarding the need for
"harmony" between land uses of differing intensity (i.e., height density
next to lower density).
BB:DC:sp
Attachments
4. That standard street widths be established as follows:
Density Range Street Pavement Width
Section 17.08.050
Conditions
Up to 2 du/ae
2-8 du/ae
36-foot standard;
reduced width may be
allowed subject to
Design/Technical Review(a)
Reduced width requires
availability of suffi-
cient visitor parking
plus minimum on-site
spaces as required by
the Development Code.
36 foot standard;
reduced width may be
allowed subject to
Design/Technical Review(a)
Reduced width requires
availability of suffi-
cient visitor parking
plus minimum on-site
spaces as required by
the Development Code.
8 + du/ae 28 feet minimum Parking subject to Code
and Design/Teehnieal
Review to insure adequate
visitor parking.
(a) Reduced pavement width may be allowed where innovative site planning techniques
such as semi-detached or atteehed houses, clustering, zero lot line, and skewed house
plotting provide streetscape variety and visual interest, increases lot usability, or where
necessary to preserve rural character, significant natural features, historic landmarks or
to minimize eut and fill grading in hillside areas.
O. Zero Lot Line. The dwelling unit may be placed on one interior side property line
with a zero (0) setback, and the dwelling unit setback on the other interior side
property line shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet, excluding the connecting
elements such as fences, W~11~ and trellL,,es. Pools, deeks, garden features, and
other similar elements shalt be permitted within the ten (10) foot setback area,
provided, however, no structure, with the exeeptien of fences or w~il.% shall be
placed within easements required below. Where adjacent Zero Lot Line dwellings
are not constructed against a oommon lot line, the buLlder or developer must
provide for a perpetual wall maintenance easement of five feet in width along the
adjacent lot and parallel with such WAll.
The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most critical issues associated with ~..
residential development. These include assuring neighborhood eompatibillty,
compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and
protection of the environment and public health. Each projeet must satisfy all ahsolute
policies before approval can be granted. These policies are used in evaluation of a /
-79-3- Revie-
Section 17.08.050
A. Plans & Policies
The Project is consistent with the adopted General Plan, Land Use Plan,
Development Code, and all applicable Specific Plans.
2. The Project is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Trails.
3. The Project is consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan.
4. The Project is consistent with the adopted Circulation Plan.
Neighborhood Compatibility -~~,/~~~"- ........
1. The Project is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment
of the site and neighborhood relative to architectural design; scale, bulk,
density and unit size; identity and neighborhood character; building
orientation and setback; grading~ and visual integrity.
2. The conflicts that are presumed to exist between the proposed development
and surrounding land uses as described in Table 17.08.050-1~ pertaining to
"Land Use Conflicts", have bee_qn effectively mitigated in the2r_ojeet design.
3. The Project is designed so that the additional traffic generated does not
have significant adverse impact on surrounding development.
Section 17.08.050
The Project contains streamside woodland associations, identified as a
significant natural re~ouroe in Figure IV-2 of the Generel Plan, and site
investigations have been completed, and mitigetion measures proposed
(ineludin~ clustering) to mitigate impacts upon riparian community.
The Project is located on a site or contains a structure or other feature
which is designated as a historic landmark, and @rovision has been made for
preservation of said landmark in accordance with the Historic Preservation
Ordinance.
The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Hillside Residential, or
is a hillside condition (defined as having netural slopes 8 percent or greater),
and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding
capacity and site develo9ment constraints, and the pro9osed density is no
greater than two units per net buildable acre.
The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Open Space, and
development has been concentrated to preserve o9en space, and the proposed
density is no greater than an average density of one unit per 40 acres.
The Project promotes energy efficiency through the use of energy efficient
building design (e.g., south facing windows, energy conserving building
materials and appliances, etc.) and site planning (e.g., east-west aligned
units, landsoaping for solar access, etc.).
8. The Project contains trees protected by the Rancho Cueamonga Municipal
Code that are worthy of preservation; an &pplieation for a tree removal
permit and report have been submitted and healthy trees are preserved
/~.. _.~through proper site plannin~ and gredin~ techniques. xist~
F. Land Use Conflicts ~
The matrix in Table 17.08.090-F indicates the conflicts that are presumed to e
between land uses. The types of mitigation measures listed in the following sections
are the design tools that should be employed either separately or in combination to
mitigate existing or potential land use conflicts. The Abscluta Policies require that
such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design.
1. Land Use Conflict Mitigation Measures
(a)
Open Space setbacks. By providing an open space buffer between
confUrring land uses eonfUets ran often be avoided. The width of the
buffer required wiU de9end on the severity of conflict and the extent
of landscaping. To work effectively, the ownership, use, and
maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined.
/.
(b)
Landscaping and Tcpo~rephie Changes. As part of an open space
buffer or as a treatment of land immediately edjaeent to buildings,
lander.ping ran be used to reduce eonfUets.
(c) Dense plantings of evergreens ran provide a visual buffer.
(1)
(2)
Sensitive landscaping can ~oftan the sharp visual contrast
between two abutting land uses by subduing the differences in
architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition
rather than a harsh edge between uses,
Dense growth of plants can be visuaUy appealing but also can
be used to discourage unwanted and unsafe pedestrian or
bicycle access between land uses,
-82- "rev£sed 3/8/90"
Section 17.08.050
/
(d)
(3) Landscaping ean be used in combination with other mitigation~
measures, such as reducing the width of open space buffer
required and soften the visual conflict ereated by safety and
security fences. (
(4) Recontouring of the land can alter views, subdue sounds,
reduce glare, change the sense of proximity, and channel
pedestrian travel.
Orientation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses and the
apparent or functional proximity ean be very different depending on
the orientation of buildings and activities in the two land uses.
(1)
The buildings themselves ran cause a buffer to be created by
effectively turning their backs on each other -- orienting
views, access and principal activities away from the other land
use. Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous and
unaesthetie "no-mans" land is not created in the process.
(2) Alternately, the intervening spae~ can be eliminated
altogether if the two buildings share a common back wall.
'(3) plan
An entire site be oriented so that the activities and~
functions are aligned hierarehieally ~ placing those least\
compatible furthest from the common boundary between land{
uses and those most compatible near that boundary (i.e., single/
story adjacent to single story).
(e)
Barriers and Alleviation. It may be appropriate and necessary to use
physical barriers to p~event the undesirable attributes of one land use
from affecting the people and activities in the edjaeent land use.
(1) Fences, walls and betres can prevent the passsge of people into
areas that would be unsafe or insecure.
(2) Light and noise can also be mitigated through physical barriers
such 8~ fences, wAiI-~, berms, screens and landscaping.
(f) Architectural Coml)atibility. In addition to the architectural
oonsid~ations involved in mitigation through orientation, the
archit~tural design of buildings can redue~ conflict and promote
compatibility.
Materials, colors, scale, and prominence of buildings in
adjacent land uses can be coordinated so there is a gradual
transition from one land use to another rather than a sharp and
displeasing contrast. Purely aesthetic details that are "tacked"
onto a building to cover up land use conflicts, however, will
cause more harm than good.
(2)
The architectural compatibility should rise from a total
consideration of the function of each land use and the function
of the space between them.
-83-
Section 17.08.050
Circulation. Streets and [:~kir~ are_as ~an .often. serv~e to. redue~e
eertaln t~pes of land use conflicts., ?epar. a~on o! eonflietir~ ~ses
with a street or parkin~ area can promae a o~z~er.
TABLK l?.00.090-e - LAND USE CONPLICTB
Land Use Conflicts
Land Uses
Active Pecreation
Pesidential
Low Density
Moderate
Density
High Density
Institutional
C)ffioe/Business
Commercial
industrial
Radroad
Parking LOtS
AirDart and
Flight Patterns
CoJiec tar Street
Artenol Street
~ Types Of Conflicts,
· > ~ ,- ~l/ noise, odor. ight.
~'~ ~> ~ O~' -->' ~x"~aesthetics
~:;.~C~g < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ access
~~ ~ o o - ~safety
-84'
O~.:{r~noe No. 465
Pa~2
b) Title 17 of ~ Rancho ~-~n~a Municipal C~de is hex~by
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 17.~.~0E, ~ ~le
17.~.~0(E) - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~
e) Ti~e 17 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~ .~ ~ ~
~ f) TiUe 17 of ~ ~ O~ ~6i~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 17.08.050~(3) - ~1~
~ ~ si~ p~ ~1 ~ ~i~ ~ ~t ~ ~viti~ ~
al~ ~io~ ~o the effect/re da~e of this 0xx~ina~_~. ~he ap~ shall
include the ~ ~~ as allow~ by Sectk~ 17.02.100 of the Developmant
passage at l~t c~oe in the Inland Valley Dailv re,lime,n, a newspaper of
general ciroulation publishe~ in the City of Ontario, California,. and
TABLE 17.0~.040 - B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
¢I~R = NOT REG~RtO) VL L LM
LOT AREA: A~E 225~ 8OOO 8000
MINIMUM NET RAGE
MINIMUM NET 2OO0~ 7200 5000
NUMBER OF DWELLING UNIT~ (A)
(PERMH ~D PER AGRE)
MINIMUM ~ UH~ ~: (~
S~ ;~LY A~A~ED ~D
~ACH~ D~ING
MULTIP~ FAMILY D~IN~ (J)
E~ICIENCY~D~
~E BEDR~
~O BEDR~
I HR~ OR ~RE B~R~
LOT ~E~
MINIMUM WID~ (~ RE~IRED
F~ ~AC~
MINIMUM CORNER ~OT WID~
MINIMUM ~P'z H
MINIMUM FR~A~
(~ FR~ PR~E~ LI~
MINIMUM F~G LOT FR~A~
(~ FR~ PR~ER~ LtN~
FR~ Y~D ~
CORNER SIDE YARD
iNTERIOR SIDE YARD
M MH H
3AC 3AC
(L)
3AC 3AC 3AC
(L) (L)
UPTO2 UPTO4 UPTO6 UP TO 11 UPTO 19 UP TO 27
1,OOO $Q. FT, REGARDL.E~8 OF Dlul MiCT
S50 ~.FT. REGARDLE~ OF DISTRICT
650 SQ.t- I. REGARDLE~ OF DISTRICT
800 SQ.~- i, REGARDLES~ OF DISTRICT
950 SO.i- ~. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT
90 AVG. 65 AVG. 50 AVG. N/R N/R N/R
VARY ~. 10 VARY.*/-
100 70 50 N/R I~R N/R
150 100 90
50 40 30 100 100 100
3O 2O 2O 50 5O 50
42 AVG. 37 AVQ. 32 AVQ. 37 AVQ.
VARY.~.5 VARY.~'-~ VARY,/-~ VARY
27 27 22 27
10/15 5/10 5/10 10
AT INTERIOR SITE BOUNDARY 30/5 20/5 15/5 15/5 15/5
DWELLING UNIT/ACCESSORY (D) (D)
-- XHIBIT" A-"I"
-7O
TABLE 17.0~.040 - B
(N~ ,, NOT lIEQUIllED)
RE91DENTIAL BUILDING
BEPARATION8
HEIGHT LIMITATION~
LOT COVERAGE ( It4301~UY % )
BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Continued)
VL
REQUIRED PER SECTION
H
(fi (fi (~
Olin ~PACE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
(QROUND FLOOR/UPPER STORY UNr~
COMMON OPEN SPACE (A)
(MINIMUM %)
USABLE OPEN SPACE (A)
(PRIVATE AND COMMON)
RECREATION ARF. A/FACII.rrY
~.AND~.,APING
AMENn'IES
(G)
N/R
35Y,, 35% 35'/.
REQUIRED PER SECTIC~ 17.0~.040-H
FE(:~IIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-G
REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-R
IB~K~M~IW)TO1XIN?YFI~t~I)NRGIff~MIlIID .iUlJEGTTO A~XD'I' :t*LUlEF'Si~iMT .TNEF, LMMiI~(~ili, NI~ONk~Y
~ A ~11EAl'ER I~AT10 QIr ~ QII ~ (I) ISDIICX~Id ~ WHEN A ~EYIEU~IqdG!~T ~ ~A~ OEIIGN
EXHIBIT" AZ"
TABLE 17.1~.040 - C olrnONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(WR · NOT REQUIRED) L Ul M
(eROS~ SAC SAC ~
'LOT ~ VARIA; K~N VAR~T~
(MINMUM N~ A~ RE~I~ (I) ~I~D
kU~~ ~ (~)
(~ll I~ ~R AGR~ UPS4
Sl~ F~ILY A~ACHED ~O
D~HED O~NG
MUL~ FA~Y D~ (K)
E~IE~Y~DIO ~
~E B~R~ ~R
~R~ OR M~E ~DR~ ~R
LOT DIME~
MINIMUM ~O~ (~ REQUIR~ (I) VAR~
FR~ ~C~ RE~I~
MINIMUM ~P ~ H
VARIA"noN
REQUIRED
, ua, C~S: {I)
LOCAL STREET
PRIVA I r. ~ I .EET OR DRIVt:WAY
CORNER SIDE YARD
IN i cRIOR SIDE YARD
i l I = BOUNDARY
IT/ACCESSORY
H
SAC SAC
SAC SAC
UPTOI UPTO 14 UP TO 24 UPTO 30
1,000 SQ.FT. (G) REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT
550 SQ.FT. REGARDLES~ OF DISTRICT
650 SQ.i- I. REGARDLEI~ OF DISTRICT
800 ~.i- i. REGARDLES,?, OF DISTRICT
950 ~3.t- i. REGAROLES~ OF DISTRICT
VAR~hON .~-OUII~=D IN
SINGLE FAMILY REVI~
N/R N/R
N/R N/R
42 AV(~ (I) 42 AVG. 42 AV(~. 47 AVG.
VARY+/-5 VARY.~'-5 VARY+/-5 VARY+l-5
32 AVG. 15 AVG. 5 $ 5
VARY~-5 VARY,/-5
(E) (E) (E)
17 10 5 N/R N/R
(E} (E)
5/lO (i) lo N~
(~ (O,H)
20/5 15/5 20/5 20/5
(o) (o)
20/5
TABLE 17J~.040 - C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Continued)
RESIDE. NTIAL BUILDIJQ
SEPARATK)N~
L LM M I MN I H
25 REQUIRED PER SECTION
OTHER
HEIGHT UMITA'rloI~
OIL~N ~AC~ REGUIRED
10 10
35 35
RE(~JIR.ED PER SECTION 17.0~)40-E
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
(GROUND FLOOR/UPPER
STORY uNrr)
COMMON OPEN SPACE (A)
(MINIMUM %)
35% 35% 35%
USAELE OPEN SPACE (A)
(PRIVATE AND COMMON)
RECREATION AREA/FACILITY
N/R REQUIRED =ER SECTION 17.08.040-H
(F) REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-G
FRONT YARD L&NDSC&PINQ
REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-F
ENERQY CONSERVATION
N/R REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-1
AImNrTE8 ~
N/R I REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-R
A. EX~LANDt~yFQRIE~111~ ANDNql~NDIdHLLIMARFBAIIHNJ. IEDEI~ONli~
IL~AGITY FAGTOR C;QIITAI~ N lESTION 1 ?~4M0.040 - !.
B. A~ I~r. AIURED luRQM ~ ULTIM&I~ C~I IIAGE ON PUI~ AIO PfWATE ITREE~ RLL'ER TC) TABLE 17J4~l~d0 · O ~ ~
H. ZSROLOTLMEDW~,L.!IC~PBqM1T'/ED!q, MMMHTTOIr~r10N17,M. MQ.P.
L REFIATOTJIBLE 17.M. MO-C.1 ,M~DT.MBLE 17M0.010.G.2.
K.
THE TOT&L MUM~ CX; UNiT6 ~4M.L AJq~t.Y: TEN (1 0) PERCENT F. QR EI~J~TUOIO AN~ Tt41RTY FN~ (~6) I~ F~ ~
BEDROOM OR UP TO'II41~TYFN~('~ PERGENT C4~MIIE. D. Su~To AGONDITK~qk~.U~. PERMIT .THEP%N~NIdG C~Mki~K:~N t~Y
AJ~ A GREATER RATIO O~ EFRGE/dGY OR ~ (1) BEDROOM UWT~ WHEN A DEW E~Q41~ NNOVATNE
O(JAUTE8 AND A IAI. NdGE MDC CX: UNn S;~.S AND TYPE8.
L IdHIJ. SlDEAREA~, HEiOHT$~4AU. lEUMIl~DTOl~IRTY(~O)FEETA.q~PEGFIEDlIK-GTi~Nl?24.0?0-D.1 .
EXHIBIT"
Gertarm1 Design GuMdines
A. Intone. T~e tntont of ~he gMdel~nes ts to assist l~e develope~ in unde~n~ng and
co~i~ng wire t~e Ct~s s~lndards for bufid~ng and Mto deign. The guidelines
based u~on corn aunt~y design goals as expmsed tn ~e Genes1 Plln, end eKourege
~e o~ I~ h~lOMO~ apelike of s~c~s and p~p~ along w~
es~eMd fl~, ~ is ~g~, ll~Ki~ng, pa~ng aNas, a~ s~e~. T~
guidelines estobl~sh a Mgh stondl~d for deign qualt~y but ar~ flexible enough
allow ~n4t~1dual expms~on and tlag~naldve soluUons.
B. A.ppltcaMltt~. The provisions of Ufis secUon shill apply to all developmen~ within
ill ~eS~en~al dtsO~S, unless o~erwtse s~e~fied heNa~ Any addt~on,
rmmodeltng, ~1ocaUon or ¢oes~cUon rmq~f~ng a bu41Q~ng pe~mtt width any
~s~den~al dtstrfct sulkier m O.evelopmen~/Oes~gn Review pu~sdnt to Chapter
17.06 s~all ad~ to t~ese g~deltnes vhe~e Ippl~¢ll)le.
C. Stto Plan Design
(' 2. B~dtn~ O~enCaUon. Placement of ~ t)ufldtngs sh&ll l)e done tn a mar~ne~-
/' compa~)le w~cn GA'rouncltng exisClng and planned uses and I)uflc~ngs. The
~ seC~)ack f?'oal s12~eCs and acUacenc properties should mlato Co the scale o~ ~e
posed I)~lldfng. Larger )ut'l ngs mo,'e semack arma for a t)a~ance
e
Access/Circulation. The access and circulation should be designed to provide
a sere and e~,,~ent system for vehicles and pealasians. Points of access
shall comply with cJ?.y access regulaUons and shall not confitct wtth other
planned or existing access points. Two potnts of access shall be provided for
all but the smallest residential developments. The ¢~rculaClon system should
be des(gnarl to reduce conflicts between vehicular and perlesly-Jan traffic,
mtntmtze tipacts on adjacent properties, combine access where possible, and
provide adequate maneuve-lng ames. Curvilinear sbmets are encouraged
whefiever posdble. Vehicular and pedestrian t~mffic shall be separated, to the
extent possible, throu~ the use of a continuous system of public and private
'Par~tn.~ Areas. Pa~ktng areas should be designed to mtntmtze visual
~m-upaon or ~e overall ~t deign.' Pl~tng Imas should be ~ened
~m s~e~ ~ugh combine~o~ of moun~ng, 11n~a~ng, low p~e walls
end gqde ~pe~o~, The dedgn of pl~ng
n~, glad, a~ tnc~e~ tn ~m~e~ ~t~ ~mp~m. T~s can be
eccompl~d ~u~ ~und wa~s, ~ng wJ~ ~nces or hedges, ~es, and
~pa?e~on Of pe~tng spies end ~ve~e~
(a)
Site Design: Openness, ~duced structure mass and convenience of
use should be chlrecter~sCl¢s of pa~tng area dedgn as Implemented
by the foll(~wtng:
Parking ireas (open end covered) shall be designed to provide
parking Spaces conveniently located to the units they are
Long, unbroken lines of Opl)osing gareges/carpor'cs on each
stale of a drive aisle should be avoided. This l~pe of design
resultsin e "constricted alley" a~loSp)re.
Free stend~ng garages/ca,ports should be located not to
MSrupt the primary view of residential structures.
Views to landscaped a~eas should be maintained at the ends of
delve aisles. Vistas should not be obscured by facing garages
or carports.
Planter b~e&ks and Special paving should be included along t. he
parking aisles. These features add tnt~rest$ng patterns to the
driveway/parkway area rhythm.
$ec ~:ion 3.7.08.090
Zn o~e~ Co open up more of the per, trig area Co ac~acent
landscaped areas rind reduce tJle "41lay# effect along the dr'iv·
atsle, offset facing SereS·s/carl)ores 4re encouraged on
lengrJ~y d~lve aisles.
(b)
A~cMtoc~Jre: Garage Ind c&rl)or~ slzuc~JreS should ex. htbt~ designs
wntch ere compatible, supportive and fully integrated into the
overall arcldtocCurel theme es implemented through the following
prov~sion~
Long s~ruc:ures present cltfficultles tn keeling pr~porq:Jons
4pproprfato with tJe o~lgtn&l design Intont on ~he main
s'cructures, end ~herefore, the gireg~cerport sO-uc~ures
should J)e liltrid to ~-].2 cars.
Recogrdze garage doors as an eleatent, of design rhythm and
use to creato varying patterns. £x~lndve use o¢ single wtdCh
garage doors should be eva~ded. The perception of, Increased
denstt~ can result from · periring am· wtth l·rge numbers of
g·rlge doors, An overly repetitious pa~lwrn of doors can be
monotonous ·rid should be ·votded.
"Fltms3~, "s'dck-l~ke" cerpor~ designs wMch port]!y an add-
on, non.permanent.perception Ire ot desSreble charecW'is~cs
of m perktng ·re·. $ubstanCl·! design elements should be
tntogretod Into We s~ructure to convey · more permanent
concept for We C·rport~
e S'I~iII u..-t91 skiuld kl dillned II ·11 (d~·l pt & 14
· ~.~. mu~ ~ ~ M~, ~ ~r ~
8~ ~ ~~ ~h I ~M ~ ~ ~m two or
m ~ ~ ~Jgw ~ i dngi d~llng unfi. For
( 6. Lan~ci~n~O~n ~aCe. Ll~ca~ng I~ o~n 9ICES I~t be de~gn~
/ 4n.~r p~.or ~t d~gn I~ emile We ~ng d~gn, enha~e~
% p~nc wews a~ ~4cls and ~de b~f~ a~ ~n~Q~ whe~ needed,
Fencing/Screening. Fences and walls are discoutraged unless needed ~or a
specl,,c screening or sefe~y purpose. ¥here they ire needed, color, macada1
end vsr~it~on of the ver~c·l and horizontal i)lenes ire needed to blend ~t~
the SIt~ and bugdins design. The use of any fencing or w·11s should ~e
cons~s~lnt wtth the or·rill design theme.
/~2, Architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with
. surrounding ~,h-r~_eter, including harmonious building style, form. size, color,
material and eoo~ line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable
from one another and have separate entrenoes. Shadow patterns created by
architectural elements suoh as overhangs, projection or recession of stories,
balconies, reveals, and awnings oontribute to a building's oharaeter while
aiding in elimate control. £urther, changes in the roof level or planes provide
architectural interest. In particular, Low-Medium density and multi-family
eesidontlal de~ele~meat should be designed with upgraded architecture
through increased delineation of surface treatment and architectural
details. The architectural coneopt should also complement the ~ading and
topo~'_ aphy of the site .....
· ' Scale. The mass and scala
open sprees, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and
overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale.
Multiple family product type (i.e.,.epertmant, condominium, townhouse) is
discouraged immediately adjacent to lower density single family areas. All
attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family developments
shall be one story, unless the tinpeet
one-story neighborhood is tully mitigated with amp. basis on privacy, views,
.and general eompatibility.~ t~,m~ should e.,gr- -: boobmetal as well~e
~ ot ateelm, beleenle~, ~ end daee~, end elmales in root leve~
aria platore. k partJeular for m-ltlple fatally prod~ tlSm, buikltn~ ove~
three stories abould oomidar m:eppin~ Imek.
Materials end Colors. Colors, textures and materials shall be coordinated to
achieve total compatibility of design. The I~lte!~l]l end eoloel ohoram should
complement tim I~ ehlraeter.
Si~,ninf. Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate
signing. Provisions .for sign plaeemantl sign scale in relationship with building
and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While
providing the mo~t effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with
the building and site design relative to color, material and placement.
£~uipment Sereeninff. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building,
or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be
architecturally ebroperi. hie .in terms of material, color, shape, and size. The
screening design shall blend with the building design. Where individual
equipment ts provided, a continuous screen is desirable.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS { continued }
4.
Medium Density Residentl~ {" M" Land Use Plan Designation ):
Land designated as Medium Density Residential is intended for residential
development that ranges from 8 to 14 dwell_tr~ units per adjusted gross acre.
The following regulations are applicable for these areas:
Use Permitted: detached or attached residential dwellings not
exceeding fourteen dwellings per adjusted gross acre. including . but
not limited to:
1..Single family dwellings - attached or detached . including. but not
limited to townhouses. triplexes. fourplexes. and condominiums.
2. Cluster housing.
3. Community facilities. page 241
Site Development Standards:
1. Cluster housing.
{a} Bufiding site area: 3 acr~ minimum.
{b} Bufiding site coverage : As permitted by required setbacks
and private open space
(c) Building sethacks : See building setback diagrams on the
following page for typical setbacks.
{d) Building separation : The standards from the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code shall apply.
{e] Buffdrag height: 40 feet maximum.
(f) Bufiding site width and depth : As permitted by required
Transition of density : The site plan should consider
compatibility with surrounding neighborhood through
provtd .L~g proper transit. ion of density. particularly on inffil
sites adjacent to lower aensities. Comparable densities. open
space buffer zones, increased setbacks and architectural
compatibfiity are encouraged along common boundaries to
prov}.d.e .proper transition of density. Clustering of units can
prov~ae large open space areas as a buffer.
All cluster housing development and mu~ti-farnl~yy
development within the Planned Community area faust
comply with the Design Guidelines as outlined in the
Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code.
1Ol
I~ID~ D~"VF-J~PMENT ~TANDARDS { continued }
High Density l~side~l !" H" Land Use Plan DesignaUon
Land designated as High Density Residential is inten~ied for residential
develo__pm.en.t that rand.es from 24 to 30 dwe!lt~ umts per adjusted ~ross
acre. ~rne tollowing re~ulatiorm are applicable for ~cee areas:
a Use Permitted: '
· 1. Multiple-family dwellings . including, but not limited to ,
· apartment proJect~. condomsmum projects. and cooperative
a~ proJtcts.
2. ,dk~_~aor~ bmldin~s. structures and uses wher~ related and
l,,~c~to a per~tt~ net.
~. ~ommunR~ facilitl~. pa~ 24! .
tx Site Development Standards:
1. Bufidlng site area: 3 acres miniteltim.
2. Building site coyernie: 60
3. Butl .~ setbacks: See building setback 81~.m-am. on the following
4. Butl .din~ separation.: The standards from the Rancho ¢ucamonga
t~eiopment Code sriau apply.
5. Bulldi~ height: 50 feet mnJtlmmn. _
.///~c. Transition of density: The site plan should consider compattbtll~
w. ith surrounding net~hborho~__. t_h_~ough provldin~ proper try_ itlon of
a_enslty ...pa_rtic~ilarly on tnilll sites_adjacent to lower densities.
~o.mpara.oie tlensittes. open space uuuer zones. increased setbacks
~anct .m'cl~ite~.tural c_ompattbiilty are encou _ra~ed alon~g common
oo.u?~iartce to. p.rovtcle proper tmrmttton of_density. Clustering of
open spe,.' u a ner.
d. ..All cluster housing development and multi-family development' within
me.Plon. n. ed ~untty area muwt c~,mply with the Demgn Guidelines as
oumnea in the Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga
--~_~Development Code. -
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ( continued )
5. Medium High Density Residential ( "MH"'Land Use Plan Designation ):
Land designated ~s Medium High Densit,/Residential housing is intended for
re_sident. la~ development that ranges t'rom 14 to 24 dwelling units per
adjusted gr~s acre. The following reguhations are applicable for these areas:
a Use Permitted:
I. Multiple-f~nfiy dwellings , including. but not limited to .
apartment projects. condominium projects. and cooperative
apartment projects.
2. Accessory buffclings, structures and uses where related and
Incidental to a permitted use.
3. Commumty facilities, page 241
h Site Development Standards:
1. Building site ~rea: 3 acres minimum.
2. Buil _d!~g setbacks: See building setback dia~arns on the following
page for typical setbacks.
3. Bugcling separatmn: The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code shall apply.
4. Building height: 40 feet maximum. ~ ........... ~_
~ c. TransiUon o~ density: The site plan should consider compaUbfiity
/'with surroundtr~ neighborhood through ~ proper transition of
~denslty. partlcularl)/ on thrill sites adjacent to lower densities.
Comparable densities, open space bu~e/zones, increased setbacks
~, and architectural compatibility are encouraged alota:g common.
/ boundaries to prm, ide proper transition of density. Clustering o!
units can provide large open space areas as a buffer.
~ d. ..All cluster housing development and multi-family development within
7 me Planned Community area must comply with the Design Guidelines as
i~._ o__utl~ed in the R~_ldential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga
- ~ veveiopment Code. ~- ~ - ~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:: /~April 14, 1993
TO:~C~an and Members of the Planning Commission
FR~/~/~"~ad Buller, City Planner
B? ~ Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
UBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - VARIATION IN LOT $~ZES
Currently, the Development Code mandates variety in lot size in new
subdivisions by requiring an average lot size 1,000 square feet greater
(500 square feet under Option Standards) than the minimum lot size in the
Low-Medium Residential District. The average could be raised. Lot size
variety is also indirectly encouraged by using curvilinear streets and
cul-de-sacs. However, if the lot width does not vary, then increasing the
average lot size will not impact the streetscape appearance. Lot width
could be amended to require an average greater than the current minimum.
Copies of the Development Code and planned community regulations are
attached.
BB:Df;:gs
Attachments
TABLE 17.~1.040 - B BA~C DEVELOPMENT STANDARD~
(NM · NOT NIQUIIID)
~ (L)
NUeMER OF DW=U. INQ UN.a (A)
(PERMi, ir.u FER ACRE)
81NGI..E FAMILYATTACHED AND
MULTIPI. E FAMILY DWI=~ING8 (J)
EFFIC~=I~Yt81UDIO
I HREE OR MORE BEDROOM~
MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIuIH
H
UPTO2 UPTO4 uP'roe UPTO11 UPTOle UPTO27
1,000 8Q. FT. ~ OF DliTRIGT'
~ AVe. M AV(i. M) AVe.
VNW~. 10 VAiW~- i VARY~- i
IDF. Pirl
CORN~;R ~ YARD
N/R
100
I/i J ~11OR ~)E YARO
REAR YARD
ATINiI=RIOR ~ll: BOUNDARY
( DWELJJdG UNIT/AC. CE~,K)nY
'to0
42 AVO. 37 AV~ ~ AVe. 3/AVe.
VNW~-I VARY,if4 VARY*/4 VA.qY
E.XI-HBIT" Al"
tables, for development o~ a Lov-~dit~ ResidontieJ. product.
TABLE 17.08.0&0-C!
LC~-~DIUH C:ENT~R PLOT PROI~JCT
OPTIONAL DKvmr-oPI~NT STANDARO~
previou~
Ninim,.m Vtdtb
(at required front
setback)
~0
Setback~:
Front Yard Average
Front Yard
25
20
Interior Side Yard
Rear Yard 15
Projects say also be fiXed under t. he Loe-Nnditm Innovative Product Optional
Development Standards provided they meet the £ollovin$ o~Jectivee for
~nnovation:
1. Provide hish design quality t, hrou~hout the project; and
2. Provide creative deat~n solutions which address the criticel concerns of
neiahborhood compatibility. density transition, and denise quality; and
3. Promote an attractive streetscape and diecourase monotonous streets
dominated by asphalt/concrete, ~arasea, and cars; and
4. Create well-dectsned space, particularly usable yard space.
-77-2- (9/7/88)
TABLE 17,08.0a0-C2 LCS/-I~DIUH INNOVATIVE PRODUCT
OPTIONAL DEVELOPHENT STANDARD~
~.~ Mtnim,~ Net Averase a,000
~ini~tm Net 3.500
Lot Ofu~eneione: ~
Setbacks:
Minis,,-, ~idth
(at required
front set back)
Front Yard Hinia,~
Interior Side Yard
Rear Yard
~5
20
0/10
-77-3-
(9/7/88)
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued)
3.
Low-Median Density Residential ('%M" Land Use Plan designation):
Land designated as Lov-Medi,~ Density Residential is intended for
residential development that has a range of four to eight dwellings per
adjusted gross acre. The following regulations are applicable to these
areas:
a. Uses Permitted: detached or attached residential dwellings not
exceeding eight dwellings per adjusted gross acre, including. but not
limited to:
Single family attached dwellings.
Single family attached dwellings, including. but not limited to.
duplexes and triplexes.
Cluster Housing.
(4) "Zero lot llne" homes.
Community Facilities as specified on page 241.
Accessory Uses Permitted: any of the following uses and structures.
Garages and carports, in compliance with the site development
standards provided herein.
(2) Fences, walls. and trellises.
(3) Swi~=ing pools with a minim,~ 5 foot high fence enclosing pool.
Ce
{4) Accessory uses and structures necessary or customarily
incidential to a principal use as permitted by the Rancho
Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance.
Site Development Standards:
(1) Single FamLly~Center Plot_ dwellings
(a) Bud area: ~ ~ ~'~'~'~ ~
~,000 sq. ft. rainimp., ~,~00 ~ f~
~ ~erage. ~ ~ ~ ~
(b) Building site width: 50 feet minimum. It is intended that
site widths will vary according to lot sime.
Building site coverage: varies according to lot size. see
typical lot plans. pp. 214 - 223.
(d) Building setbacks: varies ac~cording to lot size. see
typical lot plans and table.
(e) Building height: 35 feet maximum.
212
(2} Cluster housing.
(a) Building site area: 2 acres minim~.
(b) Building site coverage: 50~ maximum.
Building setbacks: See diagrams for typical building
setbacks, pp. 214- 223.
(d) Building separation: See diagrm for typical building
separation distances, pp. 214- 223.
(e) Building height: 35 feet, maximum.
(f) Building site width and depth: As permitted by required
setbacks.
Private open space: 300 sq. ft. minimum.
(3) Innovative housing.
Building site area: 3,500
a~erage. ~
(b) Building e{ce coverage: As ~m~cted ~ r~uired secbac~
and private o~n s~ce.
(c) Building setbacks: See diagrams for typical building
setbacks, pp. 21&- 223.
(d) Building height: 35 feet maximtn.
(e) Building site width and depth: As permitted by required
setbacks.
(f) Private open space: 700 sq. ft. minimum.
The above site development standards apply to projects which are deemed
innovative. Innovation in single family development means providing creative
design solutions which address the critical concerns of neighborhood
compatibility. density transition. and design quali~y. Innovative projects are
characterized by an attractive streetscape which is not monotonous, nor is the
street scene dominated by asphalt/concrete. garages. and cars. Innovative
design means finding creative ways to create wall-designed space. particularly
usable yard space.
2~3
RF.~ID~ DL'VELOPM~NT STANDARDS { continued
4.
}
Medium Density Residential {" M" Land Use Plan Desiwmtion }:
Land designated as Medium Density Residential is intended for residential
deve.lop. ment that .ranges from 8 to 14 ~ ..liana umts per adjusted gross acre.
tne zouowtr~ regulations are applicable mr mese areas:
a Use Permitted: detached or attached residential dwellings not
exceeding fourteen dwellin~ per adjusted gro~ acre, includin~ . but
not limited to:
1. Single family dweilin~ - attached or detached, including, but not
ttmtted to townlmuses. ~ fourp! __,?~__. and comtmmmums.
2. Clusm' housm~.
3. Commumty facilities, ~ 241
Site Development Standa~s:
I. Cluster housm~
{a} Bulklln~ site a~n: 3
nu~ ~:
{dl Bu~d~ ~t~ : ~e-s~s f~m the ~ncho
Cu~ ~ ~ ~ a~.
{~ ~uHd~ site ~ ~ de~: ~ ~ed ~ ~qu~d
~T.--
{[} ~~n ~ de~ : ~e ~e ~ ~ould consider
e~.~~ with su~u~l~ ~rh~d throuRh
~-~m~ -~f. ~ ~~.open
· .: prmm~ prop~ lranmtmn ~ dem~/_Cl~erl~ o~ units can
..... {hi ~= cluster housm[ d~elo~me~ and multi-family
d~lo~ment wRhm the P~ed C~umty ~n must
'~;'~ c~iy ~th the DenOn Oul~ ~ ou~d tn the
-~,.: · P~i~t'el ~n ~ ~ ~ C~~ ~pment
{b} Bulld~ site eoveraJe: An per.fitted by requtrt~i ~etbacks
and private open space.
Idl _ __BuOdlnl ~: 9ee ~ tettlt. k dlajnn~ on me
~ p~e fo~ typical ,_t~-~.
(el Bulldlnl hellit: 3~ feet ..... ~ .......
(fl B~. a~te width and depth: )4 permitted by required
(I) Private open spruce: 800 Jj. Ft. mlp. lm,,~
The above site development standards apply to projects _w. htch are de.creed
solutions which addre~ the i~ltteai con. rim o~'net~..bortmod comi~_ttl~ltty. denJay
streetscape wnteh ts not ~_-.~otonoul, nOT iS the street aeene oo.~ted bye_
,/
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
S I N G LEFA M I L Y
/~ Single family residential development should promote an attractive streetscape tl~rough architectural and site ' ' -.
planning design elements that create vadety and interest. Housing tracts characterized by repititious street '~
scenes of nearly identical two-story houses built at the minimum setback lines are not desirable. Generally, it ,.~
requires the use of a combination of des~Tn concepts or solutions to achieve the goal of creating varied, ,j
interesting and attractive streetscapes. · ~, ~ ~ ~
~ Excession repetition of single family homes with near identical floorplans and elevations is discouraged.
Floorplans and elevations should be varied as follows:
Number of Single Minimum Number of Minimum Number of
Family Dwellings' Floorplans* Elevations / Floorplan**
5-10 3 2
11-20 4 3
21-40 5 3
41-60 6 4
61-80 7 4
81-100 8 4
Over 100 1 Additonal For
Each 40 DU's Over 100
* The following may be counted as additional floorplans:
Reverse footprints.
Alternate orientation of 90 degrees or greater.
Alternate garage orientation (i.e., side entry or detached).
Reverse footprints shall not count as additional elevations. Variations in the
following design elements which create a significant difference in streetscape
appearance shall count as additional elevations:
1. Plans with different architectural styles.
2. Plans with changes in massing and scale.
3. Plans with roof ridges running in different directions.
_~ 4. ..... Plans wi~significant changes in roof pitch appropriate to the style.
ize and lot width variations are encouraged in order to provide designers with opportunities to
ignificant variations in house orientations that balances livable open space with mass. For example,
ot creates oppoprtunity for greater ~va~ration between homes and accomodates side entry garages.
Significant variations in setback and footprint orientation are encouraged.
[~ House size and mass should be proportional to the lot size and lot dimensions. Houses which project a
two-story volume straight up at the minimum setbacks on small lots are inappropriate.
Two-story houses on comer lots should have extra deep setbacks. · ·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · PLANNING DIVISION
March 3, 1993
~ PLANNING
FISCAL FEAR 1993-95
PROGRAM ITEM YEAR STATUS WKS
PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING:
1. Development Processing Services 93/95
2. Public Information Services 93/95
3. Hillside Development Ordinance Amend. 93/94
4. Adult Business Amendment 93/94
5. GIS/MIS Computer Systems 93/95
6. Shopping Center Parking Amendment 93/94
7. Design Awards Program 93/94
8. Commercial Security Plan 93/94
9. Recycling Collection Ordinance 93/94
10. Trail Implementation 93/95
Ongoing
Ongoing
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
Ongoing
~btotal
315
105
10
4
10
4
4
5
5
10
472
PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF
1. Development Code Update 93/95 on hold
2. Foothill Streetscape Specs. 93/95 on hold
3. Senior Housing Location/Design (Support) 93/95 On hold
4. Sign Ordinance Amendment 93/95 on hold
5. Animal Care Facilities Amendment 93/95 On hold
6. Multi-Family Standards 93/95 on hold
7. Regional Mall 93/95 On hold
8. Foothill/I-15 Fwy Beautification (Support) 93/95 On hold
9. Art in Public Places (Support) 93/95 On hold
10. Housing Mix/Quality Amendment 93/95 On hold
11. Design Criteria Guidebook (Support) 93/95 On hold
12. Central Park (Support) 93/95 On hold
13. CEQA updates/Monitoring Program (Support) 93/95 On hold
14. Tree ordinance Update 93/95 On hold
15. Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan (Support) 93/95 On hold
16. Special Projects 93/95 Ongoing
42
5
1
10
2
10
20
1
2
10
4
5
5
5
5
80
S~btotal 2O7
679
March 3, 1993
ADVANCE t'LANNING
WOrK PI~OGI~AM .~U~IMAI~Y
FISCAL FEAR 1993-95
PROGRAM ITEM YEAR STATUS
WKS
PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING:
1. Community Development Block Grant 93/95
2. Inter-governmental Relations 93/95
3. General Plan Land Use Amendments 93/95
4. Geographic Information System 93/95
5. Sphere of Influence Annexation Strategy 93/95
6. Historic Preservation Program 93/95
7. Air Quality Element Implementation 93/95
8. Land Use & Demographic Data Base 93/95
9. Housing Element Amendment (RDA Strategy) 93/95
10. Economic Development Activities 93/95
11. Community Profile update 93/95
12. Senior Housing Activities Monitoring 93/95
13. Etiwanda North Specific Plan/Monitoring 93/95
14. Design Guide Book 93/95
15. County Planning Referrals 93/95
16. Street Name Changes 93/95
17. Commuter Rail 93/95
18. Special Projects 93/95
19. Counter Duties 93/95
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
In progress
On hold
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
On hold
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
New
Subtotal
223
13
22
5
3
97
12
5
3
5
6
12
2
5
5
6
12
30
38
504
NEW OR CONTINUED PROGRAMS WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF:
1. City Source Reduction & Recycling 93/95 Ongoing
Element (Support & Implement.)
2. Density Bonuses & Housing Incentives 93/95 On hold
3. Advance Planning Data System Module 93/95 On hold
4. Senior Housing (SHOD) Site Location 93/95 On hold
& Design Criteria Study/Ordinance
5. CEQA Guidelines Update/Mitigation 93/95 On hold
Monitoring Program
Subtotal
10
12
44
8
6
8O
PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF:
1. Antenna Regulation Study 93/95
2. Strategic Planning Program 93/95
3. Vacant Land Use Inventory Map 93/95
4. Water & Sewer Defic. Study (Support) 93/95
5. old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan 93/95
On hold
On hold
On hold
On hold
On hold
2
6
7
2
20
Subtotal
37
621
March 3, 1993
HISTORIC PRESERVAT I 0~
WOrK PI~0GRAM SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 1993-95
PROGRAM ITEM YEAR STATUS
WKS
PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING:
1. Historic Properties Inventory List updates 93/95
2. Landmark Desig./Alter. Applic. Process 93/95
3. Mills Act Contract Processing/Monitoring 93/95
4. Public Information Processing Requests 93/95
5. Staff Training and Project Assistance 93/95
6. Oral History Program 93/95
7. Archives Program 93/95
8. URMB Mitigation Funding & Administration 93/95
9. Historic Building Rehabilition Program 93/95
10. 01d Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan 93/95
11. Redevelopment Agency Re-Use Projects 93/95
12. Public Counter Assistance 93/95
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
On hold
Ongoing
On hold
Ongoing
Ongoing
On hold
On hold
NEW
Subtotal
12.0
10.0
4.4
15.8
6.2
11.0
12.0
4.4
7.4
22.0
9.0
12.6
126-8
NEW OR CONTINUED PROGRAMS WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF
1. Route 30 Review/Monitoring 93/95
2. Landmark Plaque Implementation 93/95
3. Certified Local Government Program 93/95
4. Etiwanda & Foothill SP Review/Update 93/95
5. Long-Term Outreach Projects: Brochure, 93/95
Exhibit, Slide Show
6. Archaeological Map Update/Review 93/95
Ongoing
On hold
on hold
on hold
On hold
On hold
Subtotal
1.5
3.5
4.0
8.0
6.0
3.0
26-0
PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF
1. Heritage Walkway 93/95
2. HPC ordinance Update 93/95
3. North Town Survey Update 93/95
4. Historic Agricultural Land Preservation 93/95
Program
On hold 4.5
On hold 4.0
On hold 18.0
On hold 10.0
~ubtotal 36.5
TOTAL 189-3