Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/07/28 - Agenda Packet © 1977 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JULY 28, 1993 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA III. IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Vallette Announcements Approval of Minutes July 14, 1993 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. Ao TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-42 - (HUGHES INVESTMENTS) WILLIAM LYON CO. - A request for a time extension for the development of an integrated shopping center including 13 commercial buildings totaling 318,283 square feet and a service station/car wash building totaling 2,300 square feet on 31.13 acres of land with Phase I development consisting of 5 buildings totaling 267,960 square feet on approximately 22 acres in the Regional Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 13808 - (HUGHES INVESTMENTS) WILLIAM LYON CO. - A request for a time extension for a subdivision of 31.13 acres of land into 16 parcels in the Regional Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY - A residential subdivision of 68 single family lots on 53.05 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the north and south sides of Summit Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225-111-22 and 225-171-02, 08, 11, and 16. Related application: Tree Removal Permit 91-21. D. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13280 - PREMIER - The design review for building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 145 single family lots on 23.9 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the north side of Base Line Road between Ellena East and Ellena West - APN: 227-081-06. Related Application: Minor Exception 93-06. E. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU - A request for a time extension for a residential subdivision and design review of 30 single family lots on 23.45 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located north of Manzanita Drive, east of Beryl Street, and west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 1062-111-03 through 06, 1061-761-03, and 1062-061-01 and 02. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 91-28. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15172 - JERRY COCHRAN - Time extension for the development of a 20-unit condominium complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APN: 207-251-22. Related file: Development Review 88-03. VII. VIII. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. Ge FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-01 - SEELEY - A request to amend the Specific Plan by adding Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics as a conditional use in the Specialty Commercial District within Subareas 1, 2, and 3, and Pharmacies, with or without specialty retail, under 10,000 square feet as a permitted use in the Community Commercial District within Subareas 1, 2, and 3. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 93-19. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-19 - SEELEY - A request to establish a health club facility with incidental services such as child care and tanning in a leased space of 15,730 square feet within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 201-101-25. Related File: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 93-01. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Commission Business I. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN - (Oral report) IX. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ..... July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-42 - (HUGHES INVESTMENTS) WILLIAM LYON CO. - A request for a time extension for the development of an integrated shopping center including 13 commercial buildings totaling 318,283 square feet and a service station/car wash building totaling 2,300 square feet on 31.13 acres of land with Phase I development consisting of 5 buildings totaling 267,960 square feet on approximately 22 acres in the Regional Related Office/Conunercial District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 90-42 was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1991. Approval was specifically granted for Phase I development, which included the two primary tenants (Home Depot and K-Mart), the in-line shops between and adjacent to the two primary tenants, and Shop Building 4, adjacent to the main entrance to the project (see Exhibit "B-2" for the phasing plan). In addition, a master plan was condiagonally approved for the balance of the site that included a restaurant, service station, and six commercial pads. (Since the original approval date a Carl's Jr. fast food restaurant was conceptually approved on the restaurant pad, as shown in Exhibit "L".) The master planned areas will require future consideration by the Commission as development is proposed. The proposed time extension would grant the current owner his first one-year extension to July ~0, 1994. The Development Code Section 17.02.100(B) allows three possible time extensions in twelve-month increments not to exceed a total of five years from the original date for all projects approved by the Planning Comm%ission. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension request and has compared the proposal with the current development criteria as outlined in the Development Code and Victoria Community Plan. Staff found that this project, as originally approved, complies with all revisions to the Development Code and Victoria Community Plan that have occurred over the past two years. These changes include the elimination of compact parking spaces in favor of the "one size fits all" standard parking space, requirements for bicycle storage facilities within the project, and the changes to parking ratios for shopping centers. Therefore, staff has determined that this project still meets all IT~ A PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 28, 1993 Page 2 applicable development criteria within the Regional Related Office/Commercial District of the Victoria Community Plan and other applicable Development Code regulations. RECO~4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year time extension for Conditional Use Permit 90-42 through adoption of the attached Resolution. City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Exhibit "H" - Exhibit "I" - Exhibit "J" - Exhibit "K" - Exhibit "L" - Exhibit "M" - Resolution of Site Utilization Site Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Architectural Rendering Building Elevations Building Sections Landscape/Hardscape Details Architectural Details/Sections Site Sections Street Striping Plan Revised Site Plan for Carl's Jr. Letter from Applicant Approval with Conditions "Y ~F r~NCHO-.,'CtJCAMONGA rl'EM: C~o ci, o_~.:< ., _ ~A-NNIN'G' DIIrlSiON EXI"IIIIIT: /,~ SCALE: ~ " CITY OF R~'NCHO.,'CUCAMONGA ITEM: PLANNING' DIVISION / / ~-Y O~ I~'NC'HO,.CUCAMONGA LANNING' DI~/~SION ',Ii CITY OF RANC'HO-.:CUCAMONGA PLANNING' DfVISION (,'~NT PALETTE ITY OF I~NCI'~O. CUCAMONGA ~LANNIN'G DIVISION EXHIBIT:"C-D'" S C. ALE: PLANNING' DI3/ISION C~~.' OF KA'N'CI~O..CUCAMONGA PLANNING' DIVISION ~q ~TY OF RANCHo.cUCAMONGA PLA.NNII~qG' DI~/~SION .b · [ i1[11 II ~ ':!::I[ ill:l Ill : ll~lll = Ill II l,, g O~ '"1 TY .OF I~NCI-~O....CUCAMONGA LANNING' DI~rlSION ~ OF "I'~'NC'~O'-'-C'UCAMONGA ~L.'~C' ~W',S~ON r / _'ITY OF RA'NCZ-~O...'CUCAMONGA PLANNING' DITv"IS ION rFE~: £ u,'° ~o-,-e~ EXHIB IT~' fi~-/6" SCALE: The Ti.,berr'G.,,® Kenlinslnce"' himfly. Bollard CycLoop"~~' ~- Bollard CycLoops are domed top 4-1/2" round Ab ~ n~ Schedule 40 steel posts with one, two or three integral loops providing for the attachment of one bicycle per loop. Bollards can be ordered for mounting by direct embedment or for surface applications. A removable mount is also available for seasonal use or special applications, Color and finish options are the same as offered on Original CycLoops, Bollard CycLoops height above-grabe is three feet. Standard mounting is by direct embedment unless otherwise noted. Options are indicated by suffixes used with the model number, Color-coating is indicated by -C followed by the specified color, pedestal (surface) mount is indicated by galvanized finish. is indicated by ..G, and the removable version is indicated by -R. TY OF RAN'CFIO.,'CUCAMONGA PLAN N'G' DFV"LSION ITEM: CuP ~'o-q2, EXHIBIT:'~.~- ? SCALE: LANNI~G. DIMISION I'I'EM: C(/P EXHIBIT:'~- ,,~'~SCALE: / A35' HUGHES/PURCELL A REAL ESTATE SERVICES COMPANY July 7, 1993 "RECEIVED -- ~ ~IvISION JUl. 08/gg3 Mr. Steven Hayes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cuc,~onga, California Dear Steven: 91729 Conditional Use Permit 90-42 Victoria Courtyard As a follow up to our conversation, enclosed please find our check in the amount of $549 representing the fee for extending the ~bove referenced Conditional Use Petmir which expires July 10, 1993. We are hereby respectfully requesting that the Conditional Use Pe~it approvals be extended for two years to enable us to complete the project. As everyone is acutely aware, the reason the project has been delayed is due to poor economic conditions, the lack of constriction financing and the current financial situation of The William Lyon Company which has inhibited the construction of the offsite improvements necessary for this project to go forward. AS you are aware, a great deal of time, effort and money has been spent on the project, not only by ourselves but by both the planning and engineering staff at the city. We are hopeful that these efforts will be rewarded by the completion of Victoria Cou~Lyard in the near future and we look forward to continuing to work with the city to that end. / Best regards ,/~/ JBP/nyc P.O. BOX 8700 · NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92658-8700 PHONE (? 14} 759-95:31 FACSIMILE (? 14) 759-9255 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEP~MIT 90-42, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER INCLUDING 13 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 318,283 SQUAI~E FEET AND A SERVICE STATION/CAR WASH BUILDING TOTALING 2,300 SQUARE FEET ON 31.13 ACRES OF LAND WITH PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 5 BUILDINGS TOTALING 267,960 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES IN THE REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, W~ST OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, AND 28. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100(B) and the Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described Conditional Use Permit on July 10, 1991. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: (a) That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. (b) That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. (c) That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. (d) That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Project ADDlicant Expiration CUP 90-42 Hughes Investments/ William Lyon Co. July 10, 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-42 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 28, 1993 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Betty A. Miller, Project Engineer TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 13808 - (HUGHES INVESTMENTS) WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INCORPORATED - A subdivision of 31.13 acres of land into 16 parc~s in the Regional Related Office/C~,,,ercial District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19, and 28. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 13808 as shown on Exhibit "C" was initially approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, lggl, for an initial two year period until July 10, 1993. On March 17, 1993~the limits of the off-site improvements were adjusted by the City Council, as allowed for in condition number 2 of the original approval. The applicant is now requesting the first of a possible three one-year time extensions. The letter of request (Exhibit "A") is attached for your reference. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Dement of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located, that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. The granting of an extension should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Cmmnission adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map 13808. The new expiration date would be July 10, 1994. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TPM 13808 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC. July 28, 1993 Page 2 Respectful 1 y submitted, Senior Civil Engineer DJ: BM:dl w Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Request Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Map Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-109 and City Council Res~ution No. 93-049 Time Extension Res~ution of Approval 4490 VON KARMAN. P.O. BOX 7520. NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92658-7520 ,, (714) 833-3600 ,, FAX (714) 476-8604 June 8, 1993 Mr. Dan James Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Ranclio Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: Tentative Parcel Map #13808 Extension Dear Mr. James: I am hereby requesting that the approval of Tentative Parcel Map #13808 be extended for an additional 12 month& Enclosed is a check in the amount of $549.00 to cover the City~ fee for proce.~sing this extension request. I wouM appreciate notification as to when this request will be placed on the Planning Commission ~ agenda. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you need any nr~ditional information, please call me at (714) 476.5415. Sincerely, l~ce President rrEm P~,~'~J- tW~P ISttO~ TrrLv.., ,/ t'x"'rE~ OF RFOI~t: e'r · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~4 ~ VI/';AIIT¥ MFtP RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13808, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808, submitted by Hughes Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 16 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 229-021-10, 15, 19 & 28, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Future Day Creek Boulevard; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. .- 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4o That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13808 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following special Conditions: Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 2 with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino~ and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Provide necessary right-of-way and conatruct Foothill Boulevard full width from Rochester Avenue to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping thall be constructed along the south side of the street from the centerline of Day Creek Channel to the centerline of the Southern California Edison Corridor on the east aide of Day Creek Boulevard and may be deferred for the remaining portion of the street until development of the adjacent property. The limits of the off-site improvements may be reduced if approved by the City Council. Provide necessary right-of-way and construct Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way full width from Foothill Boulevard to Rochester Avenue. The median island shall extend from Foothill Boulevard to the north side of the most southerly project driveway. The street curb-to-curb width shall be increased by 2 feet (from 64 to 66 feet) to accommodate the median within the Pioneer Way portion of the street. Sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property for the portion west of the centerline of Day Creek Channel. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Develotxnent Fees for the portion of the improvement on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemented size and length or capacity over that needed for the impact of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 3 development in conformance with City Policy. In addition the developer may request a reiaLbursement agreement to recover the cost of off-site street improvements from future development of the adjacent property for non-backbone improvements. 5. construct drainage facilities as follows: 8o 10. All facilities within Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from Day Creek Channel to north of Foothill Boulevard as necessary to serve and protect the site; and Reconstruct the existing channel parallel to the Freeway as necessary, am approved by the City Engineer. Acquire easements and construct interim drainage facilities as determined necessary in the final drainage study to protect the site from flows from the north or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Construct traffic signals at the intersections of Foothill Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with Pioneer Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for fee credit against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fees for construction of the traffic signals beyond those needed to mitigate the impacts of the development in conformance with City ~olicy. Construct a traffic signal at the project's main entrance on Day Creek Boulevard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to approval of Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the 1-15 Freeway right-of-way to the center of Day Creek Channel. A temporary easement for a Foothill Boulevard detour for the Day Creek Project shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 4 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. within this easement cannot be constructed until the construction of the Bridge on Foothill Boulevard is complete. Landscaping within the area of concern for all project intersections and driveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. Construct drainage facilities within Pioneer Way as determined necessary by a Final Drainage Study approved by the City Engineer considering the area bounded by Pioneer Way, Rochester Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Channel. The maintenance of the parkway on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard/Pioneer Way from the east side of the Edison Corridor to Foothill Boulevard including Lot "A# shall be the responsibility of the shopping center. Lot #A# shall be included in Parcel 11 or some other method shall be provided to guarantee the perpetual maintenance and ownership of Lot "A" as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Approval from Southern California Edison shall be provided for the construction of the service driveway within their easement or provide proof to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney that the driveway can be legally constructed. The service driveway on Foothill Boulevard shall be 35 feet in width as measured at the right-of-way line. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 5 17. 18. 19. 20. developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: a. Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard Medians. b. Foothill Boulevard and Pioneer Way parkways adjacent to the Edison Corridors. Parkway landscaping on Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan. 21. Reciprocal parking shall be provided by CC&Rs. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMM~SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 TENT. P.M. 13808 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS July 10, 1991 Page 6 I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA RESOI/II~ONNO. 93-049 A RESOIJ3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE u±'L~ OF RANCHO CJCAMC~A, CALIFORNIA, APPRDVINGAP4DQUESTFORAD3USIM~T TO GOND±T~ON$ OF ~ FOR TfI~TAT/VE P~MAP 13808 AND C.U.P. 90-42 IN THE VICTORIA ~ ~, ~SOUTHOFFOOTfnT~.BOULEVARDANDWESTOFDAY ~ BOULEVARD - APN 229-021-10, 15, 19 AND 28 A. Recitals (i) Hughes ~ b~ filed an application f~r Tentative Parcel Map 13808 ar~ C.U.P. 90-42 as described i~ the title of this Re_~_ lution. Hereinafter in the Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map and C.U.P. reguest is referred to as the "Application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, the Plannin~ c~,=dssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduce~ a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and, following tb~ conclusic~ of said public b~a~ring, adopted Re~-olutio~ls NO. 91-108 and 91-109 thereby cc~litic~ally approving said Ap91ication. (iii) Hughes Inve~U~nts b~ suk~itted a request for adjustment to said coDditions as authorized by said conditions. (iv) Said request is for adjustment to the following cor~tions: Provide neoessary right-of-way and construct Foothill Boulevard full width fz~ Rocb~=ter Avenue to Route 15. Sidewalk and parkway landscapirg shall be const~,_ct_-d along the south side of the street f~, the centerline of Day Creek ~ to the centerline of the Southern Califu~,-~a Edison Corridor on the east side of Day ~-~ek Boulevard and may be deferred f~r the r~ainin~ portion of the street until devel~m~nt of the adjacent property. The limits of the off-sit~ imurovements may be reduced if ap~-oved by the City Council. (v) The adjustment being proposed Provide neoessary right-of-way and oonstruct a) b) c) Foothill Boulevard as follows: on the south side from the centerline of Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Cr~-k Boulevard (including curb return at the southeast corner of the intersection). Street pavin~, curb andgutteronthesouthside frc~DayCreek Boule~ardeasterlytoP~ute 15. Sidewalk ar~ parkway lar~pirg on the south side fr~ Day Creek Boulevard easterly to the centerline of the Southern California f~iscn Corridor. Resolution No. 93-049 Page2 A lar~caped m~d_ian from the centerline of Day Creek Channel -~-~cerly to Route 15. e) Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median frum Day Creek Channel ~-~-~rly to Route 15. (vi) On Marc~ 17, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu~monga conducted a duly noticed hearing on the Application and request and concluded said hearing on that date. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of tb~ Resolution have occurred. B. ~-~olution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. TD~m Council hereby specifically fir~ that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of tb4~ ~olution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sukstantial evidence preser~ to tb~ Oouncil during the above-referenced Mar~h 17, 1993, hearing, includirg written staff re,oz,, ar~ the uu~Cuents of Plannir~ CU,~Lm.iS~ion l~01u~i~ NO. 91-108 a~d 91- 109, this Council hereby specifically fir~-~ as follows: (a) ~he Application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard ar~ Day Creek Boulevard. The parcel is presently vacant; and (b) Apuroval of said request for adjustment to said condition is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City for develc~a~ent alc~g Foothill Boulevard. Council. hereby fir~-~ and concludes as follows: (a) ~lat the request to adjust said conditions under Ergineerirg Division Plannirg C~,dssion ~-~olutio~s NO. 91-108 and 91-109 be approved and modified as follows: ~£ovide neoessary right-of-way and co~ct Foothill Bcule%-~rd as follows:. a) on the south side fz~m~ the centerline of Day ~-6~_k (~3nnel ~cerly to Day Creek Boulevard. b) Street paving, curb and gutter on the south side f~ Day Creek Boulevard ~-~cerly to Rotfee 15. Resolution No. 93-049 c) Sidewalk and parkway landscaping on the south side from Day Creek Boulevard ~cerly to the centerline of the Southern California m4~.~on Corridor. d) A landscaped median frum the centerline of Day Cr~k Chan~el ea rly to 15. e) Tn/rty-two feet of pave~er~ on the nc~-th side of the median from Day Creek Channel ~o~ly to R~ute 15. 4. The city Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamo~ga, is hereby ~ected to: (a) certify to the adoption of tb~-~ Resolution, and (b) fcx~hwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Hu~b~s Inve~U~e~ts at the address identified in city r z Us. PASS~I), APPROVED, a~d ADOFleD this 17th day of M~rch, 1993. Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams I, DEBRA J. AE~MS, CITY ~.F~K of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoin~ Resolution was duly pessed, approved, and adop~d by the City Council of the City of Rancb~ ~, California, at a re~ulermeeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of March, 1993. Executed this 18th day of Ma~h, 1993, at P~ncho Cucamonga, California. Resolution No. 93-049 Page 4 !1 31TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~r~G D~%~S~ON ~ VI!'~NITY II II Resolution No. 93-049 Page 5 CITY OF RAMCNO CUCAMOlIGA - EMGIMEERIII6 DIVISION VICTORIA PLANNED C~111TY VICTORIA LN~$ N~A STREET IIE~ROVE]Exr lMPLE)E~IrrATlOll POLICY Proposed Developments sha]] construct street Improvements as follows: ~ A. Streets adjacent to or requtred of proJKtS shall be constructed full wid~ to include curb on bot~ sides of the street. B. Streets shall be extended {full wtdth) off-stte to an exlsttng public street(s) tn order ~o provide t~o separate mean of access. The Developer shall be eltgtble for retmbursewnt of ~he cost of off-site ~mprovments from future Development of the adjacent p~opert¥ upon its development. O. Projects wJthtn ~he Areas sho~m on ~he nmp belo~ (left) shall construct the specific street segments designated belo~ (right): L£$ENO, Area Boundary Area N~mee Base Ltne Rd. - Day Creek Channel ~o Day Creek Blvd. Day Creek Blvd. - Base L~n~ Rd, to Footht11 Blvd. Church St. - Rochester Ave. to D~Y Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd. - ~ay Creek Channel to Etiwanda Ave. Day Creek Blvd. - Sm as Area X. Hlller Ave. -Oay Creek Blvd. 1:o [ttwanda Ave. Miller Ave. - Same as Area 2. Day Cree~ Blvd. - Smm as Area t. Foothill Blvd. -Oay Creek Blvd. to Rte. t5 Church St. - S~me Is Area X. Church St. - $~ml as AJ'EI X. Day CrHk Blvd.- Sum as Area ~. rootht11 Blvdo - Rochester Ave. to Day Creek Blvd. Foothill Blvd. - Rochester Ave. to Rte. ~S. Day Creek Blvd. - Foot~t11 Blvd. southerly through curve. Bullet Way - Day Creek Blvd. curve to Rochester. Resolution No. 93-049 Page 6 VIA OVERNIGHT January 20, 1993 RECEIVED JAN 2 1 1993 City oi Rancl'x~ Cuca~ooga Planning Division Mr. Brad Buller CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA 10500 Clvic Center Drive Rancho Cuc~onga, California 91729 VICTORIA COURTTARD Tentative Parcel Map PM 13808 Parcel Map Conditions per Conditional Use Pezmit 90-42 Approved July 10, 1991 Dea~ ]~'ad~ As a follow up to our meeting last w~ek, ~ are requesting a reduction in the offsite improveants required by the above Conditional Use Pe~Ltt and Tentative Parcel Map as approv~ by the Planning Co---{ssion on July 10, 1991. I have provided a coI;Y of the conditions which relates to the im~rove~ents on Foothill Boulevard that states *The ll~Lts of the offsite /~prov'x~ents may be reduced as approved by the City Council" Now that Com~unity Facilities District 91-1 is on hold indefinitely, w~ are requesting redevelopment assistance to construct t_he offsi=es which w~re condi=ions of appzo,al for Ten:a~ive P~el ~ 13808. ~ such, ~fore ~ ~e a fo~l of co~=ion ~ ~11 as the ams~ia=~ com:s. I have enclosed for ~ur information and review a copy of a blue line drawing prepared b~ Charchol/"~n and Associates which depicts th~ l~m~s of cons~-uction on Foothill Boulevard per Jack Charchol's discussions with Shintu Bose. It is our understanding tha~ :he scope of improvements w~ are requesting would be consio=ent with other projects approved af:er Victoria Courtyard such as the Masi project, Foothill NA~ketplacm, the hotel project at Rochester and Foothill and the recently approved S m/the Poodking project. Resolution No. 93-049 Page 7 Mr. Brad Buller January 20, 1993 Page Two I understand' that you will be :aking our request as soon as possible to the public works subcc---~ttee to get a reading as to their thoughts prior to proceeding :o the City Council. As you know, w~ are on a very tight time line and are trying to keep Fm-r~, Home Depot, Circuit City and Carl's tied together so the project will happen. Should you have any questions regarding the enclesedplease let me know, I would appreciate if you w~uld let me know after you have had a chance to talk to =he public works subc~....~ittee as to their thoughts. I would also like to know if public notice is requiredprior to being heardby=he City Council. I would appreciate your efforts. Best regards, JBP/nl~: HU~S INVESTMENTS Enclosure cc ~ Linda Daniels ShinCu Bose Bryan~.~atiu Jack Charchol RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13808, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-10, 15, 19 AND 28 A. Recitals (i) William Lyon Homes, Incorporated, has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Parcel Map 13808 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 91-109, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Parcel Map 13808 and issued a Negative Declaration. (iii) On March 17, 1993, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 93-049, thereby adjusting one condition of approval. (iv) On June 8, 1993, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month Time Extension. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and (c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13808 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC. July 28, 1993 PAGE 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Parcel MaD ADDlicant Expiration 13808 William Lyon Homes, Inc. July 10, 1994 (Hughes Investments) 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Steven Ross, Assistant Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY - A residential subdivision of 68 single family lots on 53.05 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the north and south sides of Summit Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225-111-22 and 225-171-02, 08, 11, and 16. Related application: Tree Removal Permit 91-21. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 14120 was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on June 26, 1991. The applicant is requesting the first one-year time extension of the Tentative Tract in order to allow additional time to record the final map and secure building permits. The Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452.6, allows for up to thirty-six months of extension from the original expiration date. Extensions may be granted in twelve-month increments. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension request and has compared the proposal with current development criteria prescribed by the Etiwanda specific Plan and the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff has determined that the project meets the basic standards for devel¢~ment in the Very Low Residential District. Tree Removal Permit No. 91-21 was approved with the original approval of the Tentative Tract. The permit allows the removal and replacement of most of the site's 496 trees. The new trees will be planted in the windrows style required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Approval of the time extension request will automatically extend the approval for the Tree Removal Permit. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Co~m%ission must make the following findings in order to approve this application: There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan or Development Code or Etiwanda Specific Plan or the character of the area in which this project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. That the granting of an extension would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IT]~ C PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHT COMPANY July 28, 1993 Page HECO~4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 14120 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully suhnitted, BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter From Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Tree Location Map Exhibit "E" - Tree Replacement Plan Resolution No. 91-83 Resolution of Approval Etiwanda Height Development Corporation 153 Diamond St. # A, Arcadia, CA 91006 TEL: (818) 447-7633 FAX: (8-18)~445~636 June 21, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department ATTN: Mr. Steve Hayes 10500 Civic Center Drive P. 0,, Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: 'Tentative Map Extension, Dem' Mr. Hayes: Our tentative map for track 14120 is due to expke soon. However, due to the current economic condition, our final map application will not be able to be ready to file with the planning department until later days. Therefore, we hereby requesting an extension on the tentative map for the track 14120. Enclose is a check m an amount of $549.® for the filing fee. Please process this for the extension of our tentative map for track 14120. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, vice-president SC:kc encl. check cri"~ PLAN:igINO.. D' j~$ION EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: Z RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14120 AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 91-21, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 68 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 53.05 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF SUMMIT AVENUE, 1,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-111-22 AND 225-171-02, 08, 11, AND 16. A. Recitals. (i) Etiwanda Heights Development Company has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14120 as described in the title of this R~solution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map re~est is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north and south sides of Summit Avenue, 1,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 950 feet and a lot depth of 610 feet on the north side of Summit Avenue and a street frontage of 659 feet and a lot depth of 2,638 feet on the south side of Summit Avenue. (b) The property to the north is vacant, the property to the south is the freeway right-of-way, the property to the east contains single family homes and vacant property, and the property to the west is vacant (Tract 13812 is located directly to the west and has been graded but construction of units has not yet begun). PL4%NNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 2 (c) The proposal to develop 68 single family lots on 53.05 acres of land is consistent with the Very Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannine Division 1) The block wall proposed along Vintage Drive and Summit Avenue shall be designed to be compatible with Tract 13812 directly to the west. The wall shall include native stone pilasters with a pre-cast concrete cap and a split-face block wall with a split-face block cap. The mortar color shall match the block color and shall be flush with the block face. Pilasters shall be designed 24 inches square PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 3 2) 3) 4) 5) and shall be spaced a maximum of 40 feet on center. The wall shall be provided on both sides of Summit Avenue and both sides of Vintage Drive. The design of the wall shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Material samples for the block wall shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. A sound attenuation wall, as required by the acoustical analysis shall be installed along the south tract boundary and shall be designed consistent with the sound attenuation wall to be provided with Tract 13812. The final design and location of the wall shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce noise levels within the residences below 45 CNEL. The report shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Tree Removal Permit No. 91-21 is hereby approved for the removal of all trees, including stumps, on the project site except for those trees described below: Tree # in Tract Arborist Report Lot ~ A2 54 A16 52 B21 49 B78 61 C32, C34, C60 43 C51 63 D5 39 D7, D8 38 D18 36 E3 68 F30 23 F32 24 F33 25 G101 21 G102, G104, G106 27 G107 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 4 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) Tree Removal Permit No. 91-21 shall be valid for a period of 90 days, subject to extension by the City Planner. The 90 days shall start from the date of issuance of rough grading permits. New on-site windrow planting shall be provided at a rate of 50 lineal feet per acre. Based on a project of 53.05 acres, a minimum of 2,653 lineal feet of on-site Eucalyptus windrow shall be provided. The location of required on-site windrows shall be in accordance with Exhibit "F" of the June 26, 1991 Planning Commission Staff Report. On-site windrow plantings shall consist of Eucalyptus maculata in 5-gallon size planted 8 feet on center. On-site windrows shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan and shall be subject to Design Review consent calendar review and approval prior to building permit issuance. New planting shall be completed prior to occupancy. Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near preserved trees so that no damage occurs to such trees. In accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08, all construction shall preserve and protect the health of trees to remain, and new trees planted to replace those removed . Prior to accepting a deposit on the property, the developer shall require each prospective buyer to sign a written notice of any existing windrows or trees required by these conditions to be preserved in place. Said disclosure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation. NO construction, including utilities, that disrupts the root system shall be permitted. As a guideline, no trenching, or other construction activity should occur within 15 feet of the tree trunk. The applicant shall follow arborist's recommendations preservation, including but not monthly watering. all of the regarding limited to, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 5 12 ) The two north/south Local Feeder trails south of Summit Avenue shall be connected to the Community Trail along Summit Avenue per City Standard Drawing No. 1007. 13) Trail fencing shall not be installed at the outside portion of trails abutting existing or proposed trails in order to prevent "split trails," such as along the westerly tract boundary. 14) Local Feeder trails shall be left open at connections with streets and constructed with drive approaches for equestrian service access. 15) Houses shall be setback a minimum distance of 10 feet from trails occurring at side yards. 16) All Community and Local Feeder trails shall be constructed concurrently with the street improvements. 17) Heavy broom finish concrete crossings shall be provided where trails cross public streets. The crossings shall be shown on the street improvement plans and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to approval of the Final Map. En~ineerina Division 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of the east project boundary to the first pole off-site west of the west project boundary. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. 2) Summit Avenue shall be constructed full width, including street lights but excluding off-site parkway improvements, from the intersection with Bluegrass (Hanley) Avenue easterly to the intersection with Etiwanda Avenue with Phase I development. The developer of Tract 13812 is preparing to construct these street PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 6 4) improvements subject to a reimbursement agreement to be established upon completion of the improvements. Therefore, the following shall apply: al A written release shall be obtained from Watt Inland Empire indicating that all developer-to-developer reimbursement obligations have been met prior to Final Map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first; and b) The developer shall duplicate the bonding for Summit Avenue, with the addition of parkway improvements across the project frontage; and Summit Avenue shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the release of any project occupancies; and If this developer completes the improvements of Summit Avenue, he may request a reimbursement agreement from adjacent development. Construct sufficient portions of the approved street system within Tract 13812 to provide two means of access to all portions of the tentative tract, including but not limited to, Colt Drive, Golden Trails Avenue, Vintage Drive, Show Horse Way, Rodeo Drive, and the temporary access across the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way. Streets shall be constructed full width, including street lights. Off-site parkway improvements may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement from future development for all off-site improvements. Bluegrass (Hanley) Avenue and "F" Street shall be constructed full width, including street lights. Bluegrass shall be constructed to collector street standards (44 feet wide). Off-site parkway improvements may be deferred until development (redevelopment) of the adjacent properties. The developer may request reimbursement agreements, from future development, for improvements on the off-site side of the respective centerlines. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 7 5) 6) 7) B) 9) lO) An easement for Bluegrass Avenue over the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) fee property shall be obtained prior to Final Map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The MWD fee property shall be identified to their satisfaction on the Final Map and the improvement plans shall conform to MWD guidelines. Construct portions of the Etiwanda Master Plan System 5 Storm Drains located in Summit and Etiwanda Avenues and install concrete lining in the existing dirt channel north of Highland Avenue, as justified by the final drainage study and approved by the City Engineer. Applicable standard drainage fees for portions of the site within Area 5 shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. Provide sufficient catch basins at the Bump in Summit Avenue, near the "F" Street intersection, to minimize the possibility of overflows due to catch basin blockage, or relocate the Bump, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All local trail crossings of collector streets shall occur at intersections, as follows: On Summit Avenue, trail crossings shall occur at the intersections on the south side only, aligned with breaks in the Community Trail; and b) On Vintage Drive, the only crossing shall occur at the intersection with "B" Street. Provide special coverings (bolted on neoprene, plywood, etc.) for all storm drain manholes located in local trails, as approved by the City Engineer and Trails Committee. A certificate shall be placed on the Final Map indicating that Lots 5, 6, 15, and 16 shall remain undeveloped until such time as the desilting facilities for Streets "G" and "H" are no longer required, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING CO~LMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHTS COMPANY June 26, 1991 Page 8 11) The dimensions of Lot "A" shall be approved by Caltrans prior to Final Map approval. If Lot "A" is reduced in width, Lots 55 through 58 shall be lengthened by the same amount. 12) Building permits for Lots 55-58 shall be withheld until such time as a final determination is made by Caltrans for the north property line of the freeway right-of-way. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. PLANNING COF~4ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTES/ra~etary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSTAIN:: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS SUBJECT: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (714) 98~-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limltl f 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ~ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Deveiopment/l::)asign Review shell be approved prior to / / ~ / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted sub,act to the approval of __/ / f 4. The developer shell commonoe, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced. / / participated in, or consummated, a Melfo-Rco$ Cornmunity Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specitications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Distfict's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its neede. In any building of a station, the developer shall cornply with all alc~icalcde laws arid reguietions. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. / 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes __/ / first. the applicant shall consent to, or particlp~e in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District tot the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the ap~nt shall, in the alternative, consant to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing Distriot prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building pormits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Fscili~ies District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the ~ion of the final map or issuance of I:Xlilding permits for said project, this condition shell be deemed null and void. SC - 2/91 I of 12 Comt~¢t~on D~: This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building benmits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water diatrict within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of parmits in the case of all other residential projects. / / B. Site Development f 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading Oll file i11 the P~;,ing ~jnlik~,~t~..)nditlons contalnsd herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Planam~d- lal~nned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / __/ / 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntllsuchtimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand __/ / State Fire Marsheirs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoqaorating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building panmits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, inigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this re(Nest shall no~ waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable C#y Ordinances, and rrpitc-'-L~ Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approvecl by the City Planner and --J / Sheritf's Departmeht (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, k=catlon, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptaclas are pmvldeq, alltrashpld<-upshall be for individual units .__/ / with all receptacles shielded from public view. SC - 2/9l 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meat C#y standan:Is. The finaldesign, locations, ~ / and the number of trash reoeplacies shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounte¢l utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC conder'Mrs, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination o! concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2 of 12 / / 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adepted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual un~s shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and aPl:~roval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all Irails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A resorded copy shall be provided to lha City Engineer. / / / / / / 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanar~ly maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shell be submittad for City Planner and City Engineer review and aPl:a'oval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shell be dedicated for tha purposa of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shell have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions tot the subdivision which shell be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final mapor issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.080-G-2. / / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shell be developed and maintained in _acco__rdance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modltications to the site including, but not limited to, exte~or alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or stnJcturas, or chenges to the site, shell require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design An aitemative energy system is required to provide cionmstic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shell be su131:)lamented with solar heating. Details shell be included in the building plans and shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / SC-2/91 All dwellings shell heve the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance ot building permits. / 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. D. Parking All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be amhitecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. and Vehicular Acce~ (Indicate detllie on building plane) 1. All parking lit landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 leet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/reoreational uses. Commotion Date: / / / / / / / / 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped par City standards and all driveway aisles, __/ entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be pmvided with garage door openars it driveways are less than181eet in -.-J . depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ---/ on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and --J Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval I~lir to issuance of building permits. E. I ~ndocalc)l~ (for publicly malntllned lindecape irma, refer to ~1on N.) / 1. A detailed landscape and irrigalin plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential devalopmant, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and arN)nwal I~forto the issuance of building parmits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom li~ subdiviMon. 2. Existingtreeer~<Niredt~be~reserved~n~la(~esh~itbe~r~tectedwithac~nstmcti~nbar~er _._/ in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so holed on the grading plans. The location of those treee to be pleawed in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed lanciscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the aft)orist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methode. 3. A minimumof treee per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be prcvicled / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~% - 5 gallin. 4. A minimum of .% of trees planled within the I~OjeCt shall be specimen size trees - __/ 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within perking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 2/91 4orr 12 ,,.-- SC - 2/91 o Trees shell be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. Com~c[~o~ Disc: / / 7. AIIprJvateslopebanks51eetorlessinverlicalheightandof5:1 orgreaterslope,butlessthan / / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover lot erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AIIprivatesiopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof2:1orgreater ---/ / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-galion or larger size tree per each 150 sq. It. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope bertks in excess of 8 feet in verticat height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-galion or larger size tree per each 250 sq. It. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the deveiopar prior to g. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing ocoulMncy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners am respen- --/ / sitde for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public rtght-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. F~t ya,trt~[a~:le~[~lli~f~shell be required per the Development Code and Ior ~'~U0~ __/ / stre t~;~(';treee ,~ld sTb~ planting. . This requiremerit shall be in add,ion to ,he required 12. The final design of the perimeter pe~ways, wal~, iandecaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be ~ to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rook, specimen size trees, meander- / / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public rtght-of-way on the pertmeter of this project area shell be continuously maintained by the daveloper. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. ff located in public maintenance areas, the dasign shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval IMor to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth charectedstics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of Xertscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 5 of 12 __/ / / / / / F. Signs "l'T~e signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval Dy the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Directo~ monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and al~mval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building portoifs. G. Environmental J3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each pmspoctive buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accapfing a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final raport shall dlsoass the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if apfiroprtate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measuras. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencle~ /'~ 1. Emergency secondary _~.~'e__ssshallbeprovidedinaccordancewlthRanchoCucamongaFire Protection District Standan:is. f 2. EmergencyaccassshallbelXOVlded, maintenencafreeandciaar, a minimumof261eetwide at all times during conathalon in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. f 3. f 4. Prior to issuance of building permits for coml~uatibM construction, evidence shall be submittad to the Rancbo Cucomonga Fire Profeofion Diat~fot that ternl:~ra~7 water supl~ for fire protection is avaiial~le, pending completion of required fire prolection system. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Sefvt~ to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments sitall provide a soM overfiead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. o For projects using septic tank facllitias, wn~ten certification of accolXabllity, including all supl:~rtive information, shall be oblained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official I:~or to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building pen'nits. Comair;on Date: __/ / / /. __/ / __/ / __J / / / _.J / / / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR 'OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 1. The applioant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other appiicat)le codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. J 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing u nit(s), the appilcant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fee s may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or Industrial development or addition to an existing development, the al:~lioant shall pay development lees at the established rate. Such lees may include, bul are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shell be pmvidod by the Building Official, altertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structuree K. Gracllng f 2. f 4. SC - 2/91 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shell be mede to comply with co~ect building and zoning regulations for the intendeel use or the building shall be demolished. Existing sewage dislx~sel facilities shell be removed, filled and/or ~ to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans supmitted for building permit al~#cation. Grading ol the sub~lcl pmpe~y shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and ~ed grading practi~e$. The final grading plan shell be in substantial mnformanoe wilh the al~ grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualilied engineer licensed by the State of Calitomia to perform such work. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Distu~oance Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County De~a£unent of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit al~ication. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City I~ior to the issuance or rou~ grading pem~. A geological report shell be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The final grading plans shall be cornl:)leted and approved priorto issuance of building permits. / / / / __/ / / / / / / / ._/ / __/ / / / __/ / / / / 6. AS a custom-lot sul:x:livislon, the following requirements s~all ~e met: a. Surety shall be IX)sled and an agreement executed guaranteeing comDlelion of all on-site clrainage facilities necessary for clewatenng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Buik:iir~ and Safety Division pnor to final mad a,o13roval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. A~propdate easements for safe disposal of clrainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be (:lelineatad and recorOecl to the satisfaction of the Bui~ing and Safety Division I~ior to issuance of grading and building pen'r~ls. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for clewataring and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a I~Jilding pen'nit is requested. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitlad to the Bulk:ling and Safety Division for a,c~roval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or coml:x)site basis.) e. All slope panks in excess of 5 feet in vertical heigN shall be seeded with native grasses or plantecl with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of graalng or some other aitemative metho~ of erosion control shell pe coml~atad to the ~atlsfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irngation system s~tall De 13~vicied. This requirement Ooes not release the ac~icanUdeveloper from compaance with the slope planting requiremants of Section 17.08.040 I of the Deveio;x~ent Co~. / / / / / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 9~-1~2, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. D~llCatlon am] Vehicular Acce~a RigNs-of-way and easements shall De cledicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, puOlic paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, aml public 0rainage facilities es Shown or1 the I~ns an~/or tsntative ml~. Private elsemil'Is for non-public facilities (c,-oss-loI clrainage, local fe~ier trails, Itc.) litIll De raservecl as shown on the plans an(For tentative mal~. Dedication shell be made of ~ following fiO~ts-of-wey on the perimeter streets (rneasurecl from street ceNlttine): ! Iotal leer on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wi~ roaclwey oasement shall De ma~e for all I:)rwale streets or O~ives. 4. Non-vehicular access sl~all De cledicated to !l~ City lot tf~ following streets: ) 5. ReciDrocal access easements shall t)e proviciecl ensuring access to all garcels by CC&R$ or by claeOS am3 shall De recon:led concurmntly w~)~_: t~ ~ or Dno¢ to the issuance ot I~u~lcling Dermits, where no ma13 is ~nvolved. / .. / V~ .. 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage snail be prov~ed and sr~all be delineated or noted on the final map. The final real:) shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: , 'IAA/e hereby cledicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the nght to prohibit the construct/on of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas des~gnatec/ on the map as t~uiiding restr/ct/on areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shell be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public ngnt-ot-way sl~all be dedicated to the Cit~ wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum o1~ 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required 13ublic improvements, and it he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 clays 13dot to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the 13ro13erty interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site properly interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secunty for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash de13osit in the amount given in an ap13raisal report obtained by the develot3er, at developer's cost. The alN3raiser shall have been approved by the City pncr to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All 13ubtiC improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscapad areas, etc.) stx~vn on the I~ans and/or tentative real;) shall be consmJcted to City Slandar~s. Interior street im13rovarnonts shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutlet, AC pavement, clrive a1313roaches, sidewalks, street ligllts, anti street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- loot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated rig~-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct We following perimeter street irnl:)mvements including, but not limited to: ./ / / / / / / / / / / STI~E'T NAM£ CU'R~ & A.C. SIDE:; DRW~ STRE;~"'T ~ COMM. ME;DIAN OTHER Gb~ [~.,R ~ WAI.J( APPR. I.,IGI'[TS Tt~F.,S TRAIl. ISLAND Notes: (a) Median island includes landscapm<j and irrigation on meter (DI Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be cletermmecl during plan check. (c) If So marked, s<le- walk shall be curvilinear Der $TD. 304. (d) If So marked, an in-lieu of construction fee sf~all be provided for this item. Improvement plans and constnJction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and al:~mved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the salistaction of the C~ Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ot the pul:)#c an(t/or private street improve- ments, prior to final map apl:)roval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in bublic right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be o~ained from the City Engineer's Office in acldition to any other permits re<Nirecl. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic. street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations apl~OVed by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) AJI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City · ' Stanclarcls or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads re~luidng constnJction shall remain open to tfaffk~ ~t all times with adeduate detours during construction. A street closure ben'nit may be feduired. A cash cleposR shall be l:xovi~leCl to cover the co~t of gr~li~g ~ paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satiNaction ot the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows ~all not cross siclewal~. Under sidewak drains shall be installed to City Standarcls, excelX for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as s~oecified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to subm~al for first plan check. 5. Street iml:~'ovemant ptans per City Standarcls for all private streets shall be provided tor review an(:l approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pn. vine streets. fees shall be paid an~ consthJctlon parTnits $1~il be ol:)tairt~ from the City Engineers Office in acidilion to any other permits requireel. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Stanclarcls in ac_~:~_rclance with the City's street tree program. / / ___/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /_ S,~ - 2/9t loot ~2 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be rev~ewec~ t3y the C~ty Engineer for conformance adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of SK:J~ shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, s~jns, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, us~Jally by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A D.ermit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be oberatlonally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: / / / / N. Public Maintenance Area~ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, f ~ak.,.[, I~aaaas, aaaa...s~fs, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropdats Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with Ihe City Engineer pdor to final map alN:)roval or issuance of building permits whict~ever occurs first. Formation costs shall be home by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautificat~on Master Plan: / / / / /__ / / O. Drainage 1. and FIo<x~ Control The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be I:xovided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the curtent FIRM Zone desk nation removed from the pmjecl area. The cleveioper's engineer shall prepare all necessa~/reperts, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA p~or to final rn&o approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter ot Map Revision (LOMR) shall be iSSUed by FEMA prior to occupency or improvement acceptance, whichever oocurs first. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map al~roval or the issuance of building permits, whichaver occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. / / / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control Oistr~ct is required for work wrt13m ~tS ngr~t-of-way ~ 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain bide measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. V~ 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey dyedlows in tl~e event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P, Utilities V~ 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the reidcation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemarctino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map al:~roval or issuance ol pen'nits, whichever occurs first. / / / / / / Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use clriveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to a,o¢~roval of the final map a dedosit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of a,ol:)ortioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created pamela. 4. Eftwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, anti Master Plan Drainage Fees shall_be paid prior to final rna13 approval or prior. to building parrnit issuance if 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their rigN-of-way: A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Comrnunity Facilities Dietn¢l sl~all be filed with tha City Engineer I:mor to final real3 apl~'oval or the issuance of building pern'dts, whichever occurs first. Formalion costs shall be Ix)me by the Deveiopar. Prior to finalization ol any develo13ment phase, suff~ent ime~rovement 13lane shall be com- pleted beyoncl Ihe I~ase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage 13rotection to the sat~sfaclion of tha City Engineer. Phase boundabes Shall corresgond to lot lines stx)wn on the al~roved tentative map. / /__ / / 219! RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14120, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF SUMMIT AVENUE, 1,300 FEET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-111-22 AND 225-171-02, 08, 11, AND 16. A. Recitals (i) Etiwanda Height Development Corporation has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 14120 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request: is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 26, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 91-.83, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14120. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14120 - ETIWANDA HEIGHT DEV. CORP. July 28, 1993 Page 2 e. That there have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan or Development Code or Etiwanda Specific Plan or the characteristics of the area in which this project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract ADDlicant Expiration 14120 Btiwanda Height June 26, 1994 Development Corp. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Steven Ross, Assistant Planner DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13280 - PREMIER - The design review for building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 145 single family lots on 23.9 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the north side of Base Line Road between Ellena East and Ellena West - APN: 227-081-06. Related Application: Minor Exception 93-06. BACKGROUND: Prior to Premier's application for a Design Review for Tract 13280, the Lusk Company had an approved Design Review application to build homes on these lots, but that application was allowed to expire when the tract was sold to Premier. The Planning Com~nission may recall the discussion regarding a time extension for the Lusk application last year. The Commission was primarily concerned with the massing of the two-story homes on the lots resulting from the 5-foot side yards, as well as the number of three-car garages. The Co~nission suggested that the overall bulk of the homes be reduced to create a better streetscape by reducing the amount of paving and number~of garage doors in front. The introduction of a single story plan was also urged by the Co~nission. The time extension was approved. ANALYSIS: General: Tract 13280 is located in the Vineyards South area of the Victoria Planned Co,unity. It consists of 145 lots which range in size from 4,000 to 9,000 square feet. The average lot size is 5,165 square feet and typical lot dimensions are 45 by 90 feet. The property has been graded and walls and landscaping have been installed around the perimeter. The utilities, curbs, and gutters are also in place, but the streets have not been paved. Required property line setbacks are 5 feet on the sides, 20 feet in front and ~5 feet in the rear. RV access has been provided on 28 percent of the lots. Although current development standards require a combined 15-foot side yard setback, 5-foot setbacks are permitted for this tract, since it was approved prior to the revised standards and was designed and approved with a unit prototype utilizing 5-foot setbacks (see Exhibit "C"). IT]~ D PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13280 - PREMIER July 28, 1993 Page 2 In preparing their development package for submittal, Premier worked closely with staff to address the Commission's previous concerns with the Lusk Design Review proposal. The applicant has introduced a single story plan to help vary the massing of the homes throughout the project and to provide variety to the streetscape. In addition, the homes have been designed to break up the massing as much as possible to create a visually stimulating streetscape. The applicant has submitted Minor Exception 93-06 requesting a reduction in the required 15-foot rear yard area for 7 lots within the tract. Most of the lots requiring Minor Exceptions could not accommodate any of the available house plans. In the remaining cases, the encroachment is necessary to maintain an adequate unit mix throughout the tract, or to provide the best usable yard area, or to achieve the architectural variety that the Planning Commission has stated it desired. The proposed rear yard setbacks range from ~3.5 to 14.93, and the average rear yard setback for the 7 lots would be 14.16 feet. Be Design Review Committee: At its meeting on June ~, ~993, the Design Review Committee (Melcher, Chitiea, Coleman) recommended approval' of the project subject to the following condition: Stucco window surrounds should be provided on all side and rear elevations, rather than the wood trim proposed on some elevations, to minimize the required maintenance. In addition, the Design Review Committee reviewed the proposed Minor Exception and recommended that the City Planner approve the request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tract 13280 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. City Planner BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Product Prototype Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Floor Plans Resolution of Approval with Conditions CITY OF": ~;N'C~O.."'CUCAMONGA PL :ANNINC;' DIVISION ~r---$' ~1". wo~o WALL. Wl i I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13280, CONSISTING OF 145 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 23.9 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN ELLENA EAST AND ELLENA WEST IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-081-06. A. Recitals. (i) The Premier Group Incorporated has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13280 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 1, 1993, the Design Review Committee reviewed the application and recommended approval. (iii) On July 28, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. .. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 28, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13280 - PREMIER July 28, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Plannin~ Division 1) All conditions of Resolution No. 87-217 approving Tentative Tract 13280 shall apply. 2) Corner side yard slopes shall be landscaped and irrigated between sidewalks and walls to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) Stucco window surrounds shall be provided on all side and rear elevations, rather than the wood trim proposed on some elevations, to minimize the required maintenance. 4) The City Planner shall approve Minor Exception 93-06 as recommended by the Design Review Committee. The approval of the Minor Exception shall run with the approval of this Design Review. En~ineerin~ Division l) Kenyon Way shall be constructed full width from Ellena East to the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, including the railroad crossing. 2) The drive approach on Lot 18 shall be relocated southerly as far as possible, given the setback requirements, to reduce conflicts between backing vehicles and blind right-turn movements. 3) Landscaping between the back of sidewalk and the perimeter wall west of Altari Place and east of Fermo Place shall be reviewed for line of sight concerns and modified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) Install special intersection approaching signs on Ellena 400 feet in advance of Fermo Place and Altari Place, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13280 - PREMIER July 28, 1993 Page 3 5) Ellena Park, at the northeast corner of Ellena East and Kenyon Way, shall be installed per approved Drawing No. 1409 prior to issuance of the 200th building permit within Victoria Vineyards South, as specified in Planning Commission Resolution No. 81-37, Parks/Open Space Item No. 4. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST:: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, {714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limas 1. Approval shell expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. Deveiopment/Design Review 8hell he approved prior to / / Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of SC-2/9l The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Idelio-Roos ComntJnity Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its need~. In any building of a station, the developer shell comply with all applicable laws and regulation8. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. Prior to recordation of the final map orthe issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shell consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Malio-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance ol building pan'nits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Melk)-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months trom the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shell be deemed null and void. ~,~i~ so.: OR. Comt~,e'~on Dsle: This cond#ion shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permifs when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Deveiopmant. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or priorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colore, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and ~J~.U,c~wt, Fl'am~ ~.~m,e,~i~ Planned Community. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until sucfi time as all Un~orm Building Code and State fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to _oc_~__,pancy, plans shall be su13mitted to the Rancho Cucemonga Fire Protection ~ and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for cempllance prior to 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. AI! site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lit subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive ;orn~ with all sections of the Development Code, all other rrPl!Cvbla City O~inances, and al;plt: LIs Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect st the time of Building Permit iseuanoe. / / / / _._/ / A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Sheritf's Department (989-6611) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adiacent properties. / / ~ 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are providad, all trash plc~-up shall be for individual units with all receplacles shielded from public view. / / SC-2/9! Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City starKlards. The final design, licetlins, and the number of trash recelDtaole~ shall be sul:)~ to City Planner review and aPlXOVal I:~or to issuance of boilding permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility al:~urtenances such as tranMormers, AC condensers, etc., shall be liceted out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the acio~ad Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. V,//12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. / / / / 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. __/ / 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in sulxlivlslons shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recordad concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever _oco_,rs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the propew owner, homeowners' association, or other means a(~:)table to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submittad for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be cladicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be reco~lad concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting ot shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excapl for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. / / / / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The ~e shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further moditloations to the site including, but not lim~ad to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or sUuctures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and tot heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be sulX)lemanted with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building parmits. SC-2/91 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surlane treatment sul~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. / / 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official rev'mw and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and conatmcted to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehloular AccII~ (indicate ;letaiM on building pilnl) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including cu~o). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/t~ildings with open spaces/ plazas/racreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, enlrancss, and exits shell be sfriped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Rsstriotions shell restdct the atorage of reoreational vehiclas on this site unless they are the principal source of tran~x~rtation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dist~ct review and approval prior to i_-~_~ance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly malntaln~l tamilcape areas, refer to Section N.) / 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building parmits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom io~ sulxtNislon. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so notad on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscspe plans. The ap~linant ~ follow all of the ad~orist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming metbeds. A minimum of trees pargross acre, compdsed of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 1S-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50/0 of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. / / / / / / / / _._/ / / / / / / / __/ / SC - 2/9 1 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent lo and along structures at a rate o! one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 leet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. if. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree par each 250 sq. if. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory De.',': / / / / / / 10. For multi-family residential and ncmmsidentlal development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be ke~ free from weeds and debris and maintainacl in a heaRhy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Arty damaged, deacl, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. / / 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the padmater parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plane and shall be md3~act to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any pa~way landscaping plan which may be requimcl by the Engineering Division. __/ / / 13~~pecla~landecapafeaturessuchasm~unc~ing~a~iuvla~r~ck~~pecimensizetrees~meander- __/ ing s. jdewalks (with .horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be instailod within the public right-of-way on / / the perimeter of this pfojact area shall be continuously maintaina~l by the developer. ~ 15. AII walis shall be provided wlth decorative treatment. lflocated in publlo maintenance areas, / / the design Shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria Shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping ancl irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of Xeriscapa as defined in Chapler 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mun'~pal Code. / / SC - 2/91 F. Slgna The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmentat The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. o The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice ol the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any propeW. .A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the ~ssuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies I-'"~1. EmergoncY secondary access she# be provided in a__,?,LY'cl_ ance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolection District S~andarcis. I,,//2. Emergency access shallbe provided, maintenance Ires and clear, a minimum of 26 test wide at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pencling completion of r~:luired fire protection system. / / / / / / / / v'""//4. The ;#:~ilicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the approprime type and ___/ location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall I:)mvlde a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sut~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 2/91 For projects using septic tank facilities, written cert#ication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be oblained from the Sen Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building penTtits. / / APPLICANTS SHAll CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ,. Site Development ~ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Un#orm Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautiticatlon Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industHai development or addition to an existing development, the ap~icant shall pay development tees at the establishad rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures K. Grading Provide co,,,pllance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-reeistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shall be male to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, fllkKI and/or capped to co, r~;y with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans sutm~ted for building permit application. Grading of the subject property shall be in acerdance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and acceded grading practices. The linal grading plan shall be in substantial oon~ormance with the apl~OVad grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomla to perform such work. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Distu~oance Permit is required. Please contact San Berrmr~llno Courtly Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit app#cation. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan chacO. The final grading plans shall be cornplated and aPlXOVed pdorfo issuance of building permits. SC-2/91 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / __/ / / / / / / / 6. As. a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guarameeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities nacessa~/!or dewatering all parcels to the satistactlon of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. bo Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delinaatad and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division I:xtor to issuance of grading and building permits. __/ / On-site drainage improvements, nacessar/for dewatering and protecting the sulxlivlded properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building parmits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. __/ / Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submittad to the Building and Safety Division for aIN3roval prior to issuance of building and grading parmits. (This may be on an incmmantal or composite basis.) e. All siopa banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or soma other a#ernative medxx:l of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be IXOVided. This requirement does not release the applicant/devafoder from compliance with the slope planting requirements of ~j7~l of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 9~-1~62, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDrrlONS: L. Dedicet~on and Vehicular Rights-of-way and easements shell be dedicatad to the City for afl interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landacape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans anti,or temative map. Private oasemehts for non-public facilities (~-oss-lot drainage, local feeder trails, atc.) shall be resenmd as shown on the plans ancl/or tentative map. Dedication shall be made of the foiowing dONs-of-way on the padmeter streets (measured from street centerline): / / ._J / to~al feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocabie offer of dedication for for all private atmets or drives. -foot wide roadway easement shall be mede -.--/ / 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: / / sc- 2/9t Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrerab/with the map or prior to the issuance of builofng parmits, where no map is involved. __/ / DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU - A request for a time extension for a residential subdivision and design review of 30 single family lots on 23.45 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located north of Manzanita Drive, east of Beryl Street, and west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 1062-111-03 through 06, 1061-761-03, and 1062-061-01 and 02. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 91-28. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13951 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1991 and is due to expire on August 14, 1993. Provisions of the Development Code allow for Tentative Tract time extensions in twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time extension to expire on August 14, 1994. Additional time extensions may be requested extending the Tentative Tract Map until August 14, 1996. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets the basic development standards of the Very Low Residential District. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 13951 and the Design Review thereof through adoption of the attached Resolution. BB :BN: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Exhibit "H" - Exhibit "I" - Exhibit "J" - Exhibit "K" - Resolution of Letter from Applicant Site Utilization Map Tentative Tract Map Detailed Site Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Equestrian Overlay Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Tree Locations Building Elevations Resolution No. 91-114 Resolution No. 91-115 Approval ITI~4 E NEW WORLD MANAGEMENT INC. J U: :' 2 Z :- June 11, 199~ Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract 13951 Dear Mr. Buller: This letter is a request for extension for Tract 13951. The Tentative Tract was approved in August of 1991. As Project Manager for the Wilson Court Project (Tract 13951) we had altered the original plans to take into consideration the concerns and objections of the surrounding residents. After overwhelming approval by the neighboring residents and, subsequently, the Planning Commission, we began to plan for the completing steps for the project. Unfortunately area economic problems caused delays in several key points of the project. In anticipation of the upcoming two year mark, ~ ask for an extension of the time to continue with the project. Enclosed please find the extension fee of $549.00. If there are any questions or problems, please contact me at (818)457-21354 (direct dial). I thank you in advance for your cooperation. Project Manager / Wilson Cou/ ~ect- Tract 13951 1611 S. Garfield Ave., Alhambra, CA 91801 1818) 4,.5 ?-2300/~",~ --t CIT~ ITEM: EXHIBIT: ~'o~. SCALE: EXHmlT: ~ SCALE: v~] '--~ EXl-iiBrr: ~. SCALE: -?D'-6TREET ...... / WALL EX~mlT: r'~'i SCALE: J ITEM: EX'I-IIRIT: J~ SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 91-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13951. A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 30 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 23.45 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE, EAST OF BERYL STREET, AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1062-111-03 THROUGH 06, 1061-61-03, AND 1062-061-01 AND 02 A. Recitals. (i) George Chou has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13951 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 14th of August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 14, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located east of Beryl Street., west of Hellman Avenue, and on either side of the proposed Wilson Avenue extension with a street frontage of 420 feet on Hellman Avenue and 670 feet on Beryl Street and a street frontage of 1,300 feet along the proposed Wilson Avenue and is presently vacant. (b) The property to the north of the subject site is developed with an existing church facility, the property to the south of the site consists of existing single family residences, the property to the east is vacant but approved for single family residential (Tract 13930), and the property to the west is existing single family residential to the south of proposed Wilson Avenue and vacant but approved for single family residential (Tract 14207) to the north of proposed Wilson Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 2 91-114 (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of 30 single family units on 23.45 acres of land is consistent with the Very Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and (e) The proposal, with the Community Trail along Wilson Avenue is in compliance with the Master Plan of trails and the objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District; and (f) The vacation of an existing offer of dedication for Mustang Road and its replacement with Wilson Avenue is consistent with the General Plan; and (g) The subject site has 77 heritage trees, 49 of which the applicant has proposed to remove. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-114 TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. En~ineerin~ Division: The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole off-site (north and south) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. In addition, an in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length of the project frontage. 21 The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Beryl Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole off-site (north and south) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 3) Construct Community Trails on the south side of Wilson Avenue and on the east side of Beryl Street. 4) Sidewalks shall be constructed on one side of the interior public streets as follows= a) North side of Wilson Avenue, b) North side of "D" Street, West side of "B" Street, south of Wilson Avenue d) East side of "B" Street, north of Wilson Avenue, and e) South side of "C" Street PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-114 TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 4 5) 6) 7) S) 9) 10) Both a standard parkway with street trees and sidewalks and local trail within Lot "A" adjacent to the parkway shall be provided on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Beryl Street and the west boundary of Lot 17. Provide a 12-foot parkway, trail surfacing and fencing, and a ground cover buffer between the two, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. Provide a separate irrigation system for interim City maintenance which can be turned over to the adjacent property owner upon development. The developer shall grant Lot "A" to the owner of APN 1061-761-01 to the north. A lot line adjustment to merge Lot "A" with APN 1061-761- 01 shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the Final Map. Construct "B" Street along the east tract boundary south of Wilson Avenue full width, including street lights. Off-site parkway improvements on the east side of that street may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement for improvements east of the centerline of "B" Street from future development on the adjacent properties. Beryl Street shall be widened to 22 feet measured from the centerline from the project's north boundary to Manzanita Avenue. The developer may request reimbursement agreements for off-site improvements from future redevelopment as it occurs south of the south project boundary. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee for the middle 38 feet of Wilson Avenue and for the ultimate intersection geometrics at Wilson/Beryl and Wilson/Hellman in conformance with Ordinance NO. 445. If the easterly leg of the Wilson/Hellman and/or the westerly leg of the wilson/Beryl intersection exists or is under construction upon Final Map approval, the developer shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 5 91-114 11) 12) 13) 14) install adequate traffic signalization and/or signage to make Wilson Avenue the through street, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. There shall be no cross gutters across Wilson Avenue. Provide an intersection drain in Hellman Avenue and a lateral to the storm drain in Beryl Street. Construct Master Plan Storm Drain line 2F as follows: a) If a plan check for Tentative Tract 14207 has been initiated to divert Master Plan flows from a line 2E to line 2F, then line 2F shall be upsized to accommodate the additional tributary area and line 2F shall be installed in Beryl Street from Sunflower Street to Wilson Avenue, then east on Wilson Avenue, then north along the west project boundary to connect with the existing 48-inch RCP near the north project boundary. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits and reimbursements for the cost of the portion designated a City Master Plan facility in accordance with the City's Storm Drain Master Plan policy. b) Otherwise, line 2F shall be installed in Beryl Street from Manzanita Drive to Wilson Avenue, then east on Wilson Avenue, then north along the west project boundary to connect with the existing 48-inch RCP near the north project boundary. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits and reimbursements for the cost of the portion designated a City Master Plan facility in accordance with the City's Storm Drain Master Plan policy. Storm drainage facility plans, including the spillway and overflow route design, shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. The existing storm drainage facilities north of the project site shall be inspected by the City prior to approval of the storm drain plans. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 6 91-114 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) Unnecessary structures shall be removed and facilities which do not meet City Standards shall be replaced. Provisions shall be made to accept drainage from all areas currently draining to the existing earth channel along the west project boundary. Right-of-entry easements shall be obtained for the construction of off-site drainage facilities prior to Grading Permit issuance. Provide a flood wall on the south side of Wilson Avenue opposite the overflow path for the public storm drain north of Wilson Avenue. Provide an overflow path within the public storm drain easement and private trail easement along the west tract boundary north of Wilson Avenue to conduct Q100 overflows in the event of blockage of the pipe inlet north of Lot 12. The existing San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) easement within and south of Wilson Avenue shall be purchased from the SBCFCD prior to Final Map approval. The portion of that easement north of Wilson Avenue shall be reduced to what is necessary for a pipe system, as follows, prior to Final Map approval: a) The easement to be retained shall be purchased from FCD and deeded to the City; b) The surplus easement on-site shall be purchased from FCD; ¢) The surplus easement on the property to the west shall be purchased from FCD and deeded to the underlying property owner; and d) SBCFCD and the City shall enter into an agreement regarding the operation and maintenance of the storm drain between Demens Basin No. 2 and Wilson Avenue. Driveways on corner Lots 3, 7, 8, 21, and 26 shall be located as far from the intersection as possible to reduce conflicts with traffic turning right. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 7 91-114 21) All drive approaches for local trails shall be located on local streets. 22) All trail crossings of public streets shall be located at intersections. Plannin~ Division: 1) The equestrian trail in the north west section of the tract shall include a public overflow easement which shall be maintained by the City in the event of an actual overflow occurrence. 2) A step-through detail shall be provided at the intersection of the community trail and the local equestrian trail to Lots 18 and 22. 3) A standard gate (Detail 1008A) shall be provided from Lots 24 and 25 to the adjacent community trail. 4) Sections P-P and Q-Q shall accurately reflect the community trail standard of a 5-foot parkway, 12-foot trail and 3-foot landscaped area. 5) The area on the north side of the "C" Street cul-de-sac between Lots 5 and 8 shall be left open to allow equestrian access between the local trails for these two lots. In addition, a disclosure statement shall be provided to the buyer of Lot 5 indicating that this area is to remain open and shall not be landscaped or blocked off in any way. 6) A textured, standard trail crossing shall be provided across Beryl Street on both the north and south sides of Wilson Avenue. A similar crossing shall also be provided across Wilson Avenue on the east side of Beryl Street. 7) The local trail at the northwest corner of Lot 24 shall be eliminated since a local trail directly adjacent to a Community Trail is undesirable. Rather, a standard gate from Lots 23 and 24 to the Community Trail shall be provided. s) The southerly tier of lots shall be provided with a perimeter wall along the south boundary and local trail fencing along the north of the trail. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 8 91-114 9) 10) 11) 12) Any manhole covers located within private local trail easements shall be either buried underground or covered with wood or neoprene for equestrian safety. Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello- Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. Tree Removal Permit No. 91-28 is hereby approved subject to the following: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 9 91-114 a~ The Coast Live Oak tree shall be preserved in place in accordance with the recommendations of the arborist's report of February 27, 1989, which include filling the Demens Creek channel with sandy loam or loamy sand, removal of deadwood by an arborist, and removal of the treehouse. The applicant shall retain an arborist who shall conduct periodic on-site inspections to supervise the preservation of the Oak tree. The arborist shall review the grading plans prior to issuance of permits and shall report their findings and recommendations to the Planning Division. Further, the arborist shall re-inspect the health and condition of the Oak tree prior to issuance of any grading or building permits and one year after completion of the tract and shall prepare a report to the Planning Division of their findings and recommendations. b~ The following 28 trees shall be preserved in place or transplanted in accordance with the recommendations of the arborist's report of February 27, 1989: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 29, 36, 37, 38, 44, 54, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, and 77. c) Trees to be preserved in place shall be enclosed with a construction barrier as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and clearly stated on any grading plans. dl Infested wood shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for minimum six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinresting other trees or wood. e) The windrows within the site (45 trees) shall be removed and replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8 feet on center. The location of replacement trees shall follow the existing alignment, whenever possible, and shall be shown on the final landscape plan, which is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 10 91-114 13) 14) f) The four remaining trees proposed for removal shall be replaced with the largest grown nursery stock available and their location shall be shown on the final Landscape Plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Right-of-entry shall be obtained for the tree preservation work associated with the Oak tree prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Prior to the issuance of any permits and prior to the removal of any trees, a biologist or ornithologist shall be retained by the applicant. The consultant shall verify the location of the birds and their nesting patterns and prepare a report indicating the impacts this project will have on the birds' habitat. Mitigation measures and a monitoring program shall be developed to address this issue. The applicant shall bear the full cost of this condition of approval. 15) A decorative masonry wall shall be located along the east side of "B" Street subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and City Planner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT": '~T I ~ ~::~ ~'l su EoT. lot Those items c~ aro ~ns of ~val. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PI~,NNING DIVISION , (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Llmltl Com~o~ DIne ~'1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, it building permits are ---/ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review Shall be approved prior to / / / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / / 4. The developer shall comrnsnca, partictpatein, andconsummateorcausetobecornmenced, ~ / participated in, or consummated, a Metio-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction anchor maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specilications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's proparty upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map o~curs. V/ 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annaxatlon of the project site into the territoq~ of such existing District prior to the racordatlon of the final map or the issuance of building parmits, whichever comes lirst. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the Iinal map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC. 2/9! I o1' 12 J~ A~C) Corette-on This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of sulxlivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. / / B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on tile in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations°and $~s¢ifis ~ae -r~aneod Co=munity. / / 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ~ / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the salistaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Cede and / / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to oc_/~_,pancy, plans shall be submitted to the Ranoho Cucamonga Fire Protection D~ and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to i~_~ance of building parmits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case o! a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not wane compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicat)M Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. / / / / / / A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Departmenl (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propenles. If no centralized trash rscaptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Trash raceptacla(s) are required and shall meat City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / / 2/9] 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berling, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2of12 / / 11. Street names shall be submitted Ior City Planner review and approval in accordance with ..__/ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, .~/ / including proper illumination. ~ple~on Date: 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to beards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shell be permanently maintained bythe properly owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shell be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior Io issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shell be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall heve the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or un~s for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the.subdivision which shell be reconded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. / / __./ / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shell be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmad< Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site inciuding, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or stmcturas, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or stnJctures, or chengas to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmad< Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. / / C. Building Design An alternative energy system is required Io provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shell be included in the building plane and shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / ,~C - 2/91 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / / 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered lrom adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the panking stall (including cud3). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped par City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from pack of sidewalk. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shell restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor pa~ing areas. Compicuon Da~: / / / / __J / / / / / / / ~ / 6. Plans for any security gates shell be submitted for the C~ Planner, City Engineer, and ~ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping(for publicly mintsinN landscape smss, refer to Section N.) V/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / / ing in the case of restdentlal development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and appn3vel pdor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. ~/~ 2. Existing trees required t~ be preserved in place she~ be pr~tected with a constructi~n bar~er ~ / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.' The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. A minimumof trees par gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shell be provided / / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, ____ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~% - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees- 24-inch box or larger. ~ 5. Within pa~king lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the pa~ing area at solar noon on August 21. / / / / 2/91 4 of 12 ///8. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less Ihan 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. AIIprivatesiopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightando12:1 orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing o _~'~_ Jpancy for these units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- sibie for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as weft as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kepl free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertitizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter pari~veys, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required lar~ plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any pad,way landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as rnounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and Intensified iandecaplng, is required along ¥ ~ 15. 16. 14. Landscaping and imgetion systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the cieveioper. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If ioc~ted in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Tt---,~e criteria shall encourage the natural growth ~aracteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapler 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Complcu.~n Dam: / / / / / / / / / / __/ / __/ / / / / / / / / / SC. 2/91 5 o1' 12 ~'q~O F. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part ol t his approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separale application and approval by the Planning Division prior 1o installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice o! the Fourth Streel Roc~ Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written nottoe of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. ~ 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted tor City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of inferior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construofion techniques provided, and if abpropdate, verify lhe adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures confained in the final report. H. Other Agencies V/' 1. Emergency secondary access shallbe provided in accordance with Ranche Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standards. Emergency access shall be provided, mainfenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 leer wide at all limes dudng conetraction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicanf shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residenfial deveiopmenfs shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. SC - 2/9! o For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino Counfy Department of Environmenfal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) g89-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development V// 1. The a,oplicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal C,o~e, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safely Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and japplicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development lees at the established rate. Such fees may include, t~ut are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing doveiopment, the applicant shell pay development fees at the established rate. Such tees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Exlatlng Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the proparty line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shell be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disl~sal facilities shell be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the Uniform Plurnt~ing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans suDmitted for building permit application. K. Grading Grading o! the subiect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, Cily Grading Standards, and accelXed grading practices. The final grading plan Shell be in substantial conformance with the al:N:~oved grading plan. A soils reparf shell be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State ot California to perform such work. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County DepartmeN of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The final grading plans shall be coml~latad and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 2/91 / / / / / / / / .~/ / , / / / / ._.J / / / J / ,/ / 6. As a custom-lit subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing cornpletlin of all on-site clrainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safely Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Buik:ling and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slipe banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other aitemative mathod of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement ok>es not release the applicant/deveioper from (xm~pliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. / /, __/ / / / / / '*"oUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714)~8-18~2, FOR COMPLIANCE ,1-1 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. D~llcatlon and Vehicular Acce~ V/' 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscal~ areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. I~vlte easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feetfar lmils, Itc.) ~ be r#erved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. V/ 2. Dedication shall be made of the lo,owing rights-of-way on the perimeter streets ~ / (measured from street centerfine): total feet on total feet on SC * 2/91 3. An irrevocableofferofcledicationfor for all private streets or drives. -fOOt wide roaOway easement $haJl Ix made / / 4. Non-vehicular access shall be cled~.,~ed to the City for Ihe following streets: / __ 5. Recipmcalaccesseasements shallbeprovide~lonsuringasceestoallparcols I~/ CC&Rs __'__ __ or by ~lee~s and shall be roco~ed concurrently with the map or p¢~or to the issuance of buik:ling permits, where no map is involved. ~dvate drainage e~sernents for cross-lot clrainage shall I~ Fo¥ided and shall be c~elineatecl ~ or noted on the final map. / /-- 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a I O-foot minimum buildir)g restriction area on the neighbering lot adjoining the zero Iol line wall and contain the lollowing language: / "l/We hereby declicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the rfght to prohibit the construction of (res/clential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restr/ct/on areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public ngnt-ol-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. / / 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along dght turn lanes. to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of cures. ff cu(o adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provldecl. __/ / 11. The clevelopar shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests __J ' / necassar~ to construct the reduired public improvements, and If he/She should fail to do so, the deveiopar shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as t he City acquires the properly interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the clevetol=er of all costs incun'ed by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the sul~livtsion. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the fon~ of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the clever, at cleveloper's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved t)y the City prior to commencement of the alX)reisal. M. Street Irnpr0vement~ 1. All public iml~ovement$ (tntehor streets, clrainage factlillas, community trails, pasoos, __/ landscaped areas, etc.) $~own on t~ plans ancl~or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, ~ are not limited to, cu(o and gutter, AC pavement. alllye appmacttes, siclewaks, street lig~l, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, w~hin a 4O -foM wide dedicated/tghl-of-way shall be constructed for all hal/-section streets. / / 3. ConstnJCt Ihe following Ixrlrneter street improvements including, I=ut not limited to: __/ / STREET NAME CURB & A.C. ~DE: DR/VE ~ ~ COMM. M~DIAI~ OTHER GUTTER PVMT WALK APPR. I. JOH'I~ ~ TRAIl., ~ S~ - 2/91 9of12 ~)~ Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. {d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by Ihe City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the C~ Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance Of building permits, whichever occurs first. bo Prior to any work being performed in public right.of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction ot the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruct ion of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for tuture traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other I~,,ations apgroved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) AJl pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othen~ise specified by tha City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullroge. e.-' Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of tntemections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing C~ made reduidng construction sha# remain opan to traffic at all times with ededuate detours during construction. A street clo~urs pormit may be re~irad. A cash delimit shall be pn~vided to cover the corn of grading and paving, wh~ shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cmH sidewalks. Under sidewak drains shall be instait~ to City Standards, excegl for single family lots. h. Handicap LC-Ce__ss ramp design shall be as specified by the Cl~ Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner I:~ior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans par City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. P~r to any work being padorated on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and constnJction parmils shall be ol~ain~l from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other parmits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or la~gar, shall be installed par City Standards in accordance with tha City's street tree program. / / / / / / __/ / ___/ / / / / /__ / / / / SC - 2/91 10o~' 12 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with actopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sign shall be plotled for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: Dab /__ /__ / / / / 9. All pUblic improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: / / N. Public Maintenance Areal ~ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards sitall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Lancl~apo Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join anti, or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with lhe City Engineer I:~or to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be home by the devaiopar. 3. AKreduired public landscaping and irrigation systems 8hallbe continuously maintained by the developer until accepled by the City. 4. Pariwvay landscaping on the following street(s) sha# conform to the rasuits of the respective Beautification Master Plan: / / / / O. Drainage anal Ftood Control ~ 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. V'/' 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The cleve ,'s engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and t'M:lmlo~raullc calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be oDt~ined Imm FEMA prim' to final map approval or issuance of building parmits, whichever o~curs first. A letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acoeplance, whichever occurs first A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to tina, map approval or tha issuance of building permits, whichever occurs lirst. A, Jl drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. / / .~C - 2/91 l! of 12 4. A permit from the Count/Flood COntrol District is required for work within i~s right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. / /__ / / P. Utilities V'/ 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standan:Is. Easements shall be provided as required. [a~ 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / X,,~ 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ~ ./ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Depa[lment of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance o! permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Reclulrement~ anti Approvals 1.The separate parcels contained wRhin the project boundaries shall be legally combined into / · / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. __ 2. An easement for a joint use driveway sitall be provided prior to final map approval or .--/ . / issuance of building permits, wlNichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District arnon0 the newly created parcels. 4. Eftwanda/San Sevaina Area Regional Mainlb'm, Seoorglary Regional, and Master Plan .~/ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance ff no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for wo,lt within lheir right-of-way: __/ / 6.A s~;nad consent and waiver 1orm to ~ and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be flied with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of builcllng permits, whichever _oc~__,rs firit. Foml~ion costs shall be IDOlTIe by the Developer. Prior to finaiization of any development phase, suff'~ent improvement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage proreckon to the satisfaction of the Cily Engineer. Phase bounclaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the apl~oved tentalive map. / / / 2/91 12of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 91-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13951, A RESIDENTICaL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 30 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 23.45 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE, EAST OF BERYL STREET, AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1062-111-03 through 06, 1061-761-03, and 1062-061-01 and 02. A. Recitals. (i) George Chou has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13951 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 14, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 14, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and /? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 2 91-115 3. Based i and 2 above, this and every condition attached hereto and That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs Commission hereby approves the application subject to each set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, incorporated herein by this reference. Plannina Division: 1) Chimneys shall receive detail that will provide variation between the four unit types. 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) S) 9) Multi-pane windows shall be utilized at the sides and rear of residences where large amounts of glass are not currently proposed, especially the large windows on the right elevation of Plan 2 and the windows on the left elevation of Plan 1. The half round window detail at the right elevation of Plan 2 shall be removed. The arch detail in the gables of the left elevation of Plan i and the rear elevation of Plan 3 shall be removed. Reveals shall continue across elevations where possible. Roof tile with more tonal variation shall be used. The 45 degree angle at the roof corners of Plan 3 and 4 shall be replaced with 90 degree corners. The 5-foot wall setback from the back of sidewalk on Manzanita Drive shall be dimensioned on the site plan and shall be drawn at a corresponding scaled distance of 5 feet from the back of sidewalk. Walls at the corner side yards on the east end of Wilson Avenue shall return to the sides of houses. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13951 - CHOU August 14, 1991 Page 3 91-115 10) Landscaping on Wilson to Hellman and Beryl shall emulate landscaping on adjacent tracts. 11) The design of the Wilson parkways shall utilize the approved street trees. 12) The Manzanita Drive parkway shall incorporate approved trees or an approved alternate street tree which ties in with existing trees. 13) All pertinent conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 13951 shall apply. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEAt MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Those items che~ are ~ffio~ of ~val. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (714) 988-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Llmltl ~ ]~= V/1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---J / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of ap9reval. 2. Development/Design Review slall be al~3roved prior to / / __/ / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of ~ / 4. The deveioper shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Idello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to sewe the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all spacitications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time rscon:lation of the final map V// 5. Prior to recordation of the final; or the issuance of bulk:ling permits, whichever comes. __/ / first, the applicant shall coneent to, or participate in, the eata131ishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distdct lot the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the al~nt shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building pain,its, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not ton'ned a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months lrom the date of apOroval of the pmjecl and prior to the rscordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said pro~cl, this condition shell be deemed null and void. I of 12 2/9! ,/ This condition shall be waned if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pmjeots. P~,-.~ h'o/'T T I'"'~'::T.:..'c" J C.o~oic t~cm Dat~: __/ / B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and $~ee#le ~ae a~ 4~aeM~ Ce,m.-nwnity. / / 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as a, Un~orm Building Code and State Fire Marshalrs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to J 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoq3orating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review .and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape irrigation, and street irnpmvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (sucfi as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map al:~Xoval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive ~ompllance with all sections of the Development Code, all other aliiCable City Ordinances, and applt~.-~'le Community Plans or Specitic Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. A detailed on-alte lighting ~ shall be reviewed and app'oved I~/ the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. If no centralized trash receptaclas are provided, all trash pic~.up shall be for individual units with all recel~aCieS shielded In)m public view. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the num13er of trash rece~acies shall be sub~lct Io City Planner review and aPl~'oval prior to issuance of building permits. / / SC - 2/91 10. All ground-mounted utility amunenances Suc~ as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located OUt of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landec;koing to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ,/ 11. street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. Compteuo~ Da~ 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted Ior City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&RS) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the __/ / Homeowners' Association are subiect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney, They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the propeW owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City, Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements Shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easemahts may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of lhe final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excepl for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. / / / / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No, · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or intedor alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, ralocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or ctmnges to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. / / C. Building Design An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and afficiancy. NI swimming I:X~Ols installed at the time of initial development shall be suppMmanted with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / SC - 2/91 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sul~act to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / / 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association si~all be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be inctuded in building plans. D. Parking an(I Vehicular Accese (indicate dataill on bulkling planl) 1. All parking iot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including cud3). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buiidings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. o All parking speces shall be double striped par City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from pack of sidewalk. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circ~latibn aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any security gates shell be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. E. Landscaplng.(for publicly maintained lamt~c. ape areal, refer to Sectlo~ N.) 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of resiclentlal development, shall be Ix~arad by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and al~3~wel pdor to the issuance of building pan'nits or prior final map alN:xoval in the case of a custom lot sulxlivtslon. Y 2. Existing trees required to be prosewed in place shell be I:~OteCted with a construction pamer in acco rdance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of tho~ tre~ to be preserved in place and new localions for transplanted trees shall t)e shown onthe cletatled lanclscape plans. The aPl~c, anl shallfollow all of the arborlsrs recommendations regarding presswatlon, transplanting and trimming methods. A minimum of trees per gross acre, coml:~'ised of the following sizes, shall be provided withirt the I:~jact: % - 48- inc~ box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gaaon, and % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of .% of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inc~ box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for eve~/ three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50*/, of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. / / / / / / __/ / __/ / / / / / __/ / ._Y / __/ / / / / / 2/91 4 of 12 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. V/// 7. A~~pr~vates~~pebanks5feet~r~essin~ertica~heigh~and~f5:1~rgreaters~~pe~but~essthan / / 2:1 slope, shell be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall inclu(~e a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. ///8. AII private siopes in excess of S feet, butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof2:1orgreater ~ / siope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their ap13earance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and al~ropriate ground cover. In acldition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. if. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is soidandoccupiedbythebuyer. Prlortoreleasingoccupancyforthoseunlts, aninspectlon shall be conckJCted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the pul:dic rlgnt-of-way. All landscapacl areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any clamaged, deed, cliseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. / ! Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requiremere shell be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimater parie~ays, wa~s, iandsca;ing, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans ~ shall be sul~ect to City Planner review and a;lxoval and coorclinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan whiCh may be required by the Engineering Division. · [.]. __./ / 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, rneander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and inlensffiacl landscaping, i~ recNired along / 14. Landscaping and inigation systems required to be installad within tbe pubtic right-of-wayon / / the perimeter of this project area she# be continuously mamatried tW the developer. V/' 15. All walis shall be provicled with clecorative treatment. Ifiocated in l:xJblic maintenance areas,. // the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. ~16. Tree maintenance criteria ~hall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / / apc)mval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growlh ct~aracteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the pdncil;:des of / / Xedscape as defined in ChaFXer 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC - 2/9 ~ 5 of F. Signs The signs indicated on the submitte~ plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation ol any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each proepective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report Shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shell discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if aPl~ate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agenclel~ V/f 1. Emergency secondary acceas shell be provided in a__~'~:!_ ance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standards. SC - 2/91 Emergency access shell be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all limas during construction in a(x:x)rdance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for con~ustible construction, evidence shell be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Rre Protection D~rict that temporary water supply for fire pmtactldn is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shal contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ovemead struclure for mail boxes with adequate ligNing. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be su~act to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pen'nits. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shell be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Otlicial prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. / /__ / / / / / / / / _._/ / / / / / __/ / / / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR t"**~MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. ~lte Develol~nent 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- / / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. ~//2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing unit(s), the a!~icant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial develol~'nent or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development lees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures o Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building s .hell be demolished. Ex'tst!ng sewage dls;osal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capp~ to comply with the Uniform Plumping Cocle and Uniform Building Code. K. Gredlng V//2. Undengmund on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit ai:~tion. Grading of the sul::~ect property shall be in accordance wtlh the Uniform Building Code, C~ Grading Standards, and acx=e13ted gredi~ practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance wilh the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a Qualified engineer ilceneed by the State of California to The deveioprnent is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil DistuFoance Permit is required. Piease contact San Bernardino Courly Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit apt~cation. Documerlation of such permi~ shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading perrnil. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified en neer geok gist and mi~ed at the time of al~lication for grading plan check. The final grading plans shall be compieted and approved pt~or to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/91 / / __/ / / / / / __/ / / .,J / / 6. As a custom-lit subdivislin, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be pasted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completlin of all on-site clrainage facilities necessary !or dewatering all parcels to tlNe satisfaction of fine Building end Safety Division prior to final map a~prcval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. /-kopropriate easements for safe dispasal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be Clelineated and raco~ed to the satisfaction of the E~uilding and Safety Division prior to issuance of gracIlng and building permits. / / c. On-sits drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subclivlded propetites, are to be installed prior to i_t~_,ance of building permits for construction upan any parcel that may be su~act to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. / / Final grading plans for each parcsl are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for alx)roval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or compo~e pasis.) __./ / e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical heigN shall be seeclad with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control ut:x)n completion of gracing or some other alternative matlx)d of erosion control II~al I)1 com~atlcI to trio satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system mall be ix~)vtlecl. This requirement does not release the apl~icant/deveicper from c~T~ance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.0401 of the Doveiolxnt~ Code. APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) ~18-1l~2, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Aceale V/ ~. RigNs-of-way and easements sl~all be clacic, ated to the Cily fix ~11 interior public streets, community trails, public pasees, ~ ~ ames, mmet trees, and ~ drainage facilities as shown on the I~lnl IncFor tlr~ map. I~t elllmln~l lot non-p~olic facililies (cro~$-iot drainage, local res<tar trial, ITC.) litIN be rllewt;I I~ Ihewn on the plans and/or tentative map. V'/ 2. De<lication shall be ~ of !he following rlgtll-of-wly o~1 ~ I~lt Streets (measured from street centmane): __/ / total feet on to4al feet or, 2/9! 3. An i,Tevocat~ offer of dedication foc for all private at[lots or drives. -fool wkla madway eaaement slla. be ma~e / / 4. Non-vehicular local8 shill b~ de(:J[c~ed to 1he CIy lot Ifil ~ Itllltl: 5. ReciproCal access eesemems snarl be pmvidecl eg~urthg access to all parris by CC&Rs / or tzy Oeecis and shall be recon:lacl concurmntty wiU1 ~ ~ or pdoc to the issuance of 8 or 12 V// 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall I:)e provicted and shall be clelineated or noted on the final map. ~ 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum buiioing restriction area on the neighix)ring 10f adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga the rigl?t to prohibit tl~e construction of (resiclential) buildings (or ott)er structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas.' ~// 8. A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each io! to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. All existing easements lying within future rignts-ol-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public rignt-of-way shall be cledicatecl to the City wherever they encroach onto I:.ivate property. 10. Aclclitlonal street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes. to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curt:)s. If cull:) adjacent sidewalk is used along the rignt turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shell be proviclecl. 11. The clevelopar shell make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site proparty interests necassan/to construct the required public improvements, ancl it he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 clays prior to sulxnlttal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the intlxc)vements I~muant to Government Code Section 66462 at sucl~ time as the City acquires the pmpe/ty interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shell provide for payment by the developer of all costs inCUlTed by the City to acquire lhe off-sile property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secure/ for a portion of these costs Shall be in the form of a cASh (:foposit in the amount given in an aplxaisat report oblalned by the develoMir, at clevalofm!'$ cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Impmv'ement. 1. All pu131ic intl~ovements (intelfor streets, drainage facMles, communtly trails, paseos, landecapKI areas, etc.) shown on It~ planl and/or tentalive map shall Ix conatnJcted to City Standarcls. Interior street iml:xovementl shall incAide, I~t am nM limited to, cue anti gutter, AC pavement. cl~ve aplxoache,, aldewab, street ighll, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide Pevement, within · 40 4o(X wide dedicated fighi-of-way shall be constnJcted for all hal!-14ctkm streets. 3. Construct Ihe foiowing pertmeter street Improvements Inck. dng, but not limited to: / / / / ._./ / / '/ __J / / / STREET NAM~ CURB & A.C. ~D~' Di~/E ~ ~ COMM. ~ OTHER GI.,"T'I~R PVMT WAlK APP!t UOH'/~ ~ TRAIl, I~.,,N~D Notes: (a) Median island inclucles landscaping and iragallon on meter, (b) Pavement reconstruction anti overlays will be cletermine0 cluring plan cl~eck. (c) If So marked, s~e- walk shall be curvilinear per STD, 304, (cI) if So marked, an in-lieu of construction fee s~all be providecl for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lignts, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be suDmittecl to and approved by the City Engineer. Security sitall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ot the puDiic and/or pdvste street improve. ments, prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whiotmver occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit sr',all be oDtained from the City Engineer'$ Office in actcgtion to any other permits reduirm:~. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interc~nnect conduit sl~it be installed to the satisfaction of ~ City Engineer. CL Signal conduit with pull boxes shell be installed on any new conatmction or reconstruction of major, secondary or colisclor streets wtdch intersect with ofher major, secondary or collector streets for/uture traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be ptaoed on both sicSes of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any olher Iocatlon~ approved by the City Engineer. (1) AJI pull boxes shall be NO. 6 unless ofheMi~e ~oeclliecl by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e.. * Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all Iour ~omer~ of intemectiorm per City Standarcis or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing C~ roads reClUiring oomtruclio~ shal remain open to traffic at all times with adequate cletolJrl during ()ofiat~clton. A M clolum ~ may I~ requiracl. A CaSh clepo~ shal be praytried mmvorthe(matof~radinglndpavthg, which shalbe rofunded upon completion of lbe conatnx~k)n to Ibe I ~e lion of the Oily Engineer. g. Concemratederainageftowsat~lnotcm~sidmmb. Under~wakclmim shait be installed to City Standan~, except for ~ family ~ Handicap access ramp design shall be as ~mcifle¢l by the City Engineer. i. Street nm~es ~'mll be ~pprov~l by tbe City Plmmer p~r to submlt~l for firat plan check. 5. Street improvement I~ns per Clly StandatoM for all private attoeta shall be provided for review and aplxOval by the C~/Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on tbe pri- vate streets, fees shal be paid and cormmmion pem~ ~ be ol~ained from tbe City Engineer's Office in a~lltion to any other permltl required. 6. Straelt trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or largor, shall be inatalle¢l per City Standards in a__~_rclance with the City's street tree program. / / / / / / / / / / _..J / __J / / /__ I 1 / t 2/91 10of' 12 Intersection line of site deserts shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance w~n aOopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections. including driveways. Walls, s~gns, and slopes shall be located outside the lines o! sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residehtial street ihtersections shall have their noticeability improved, usualty by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. / / / / 8. A permit shall be obtained Irom CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: ~ / 9. All public im0rovements on the following streets shall be ol:mrattonally complete pdor to the issuance of building permits: / / N. Public Maintenance Ama~ V/ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: . 2. A signed coneant and waiver form to join and/or form the aplxoprlate Landscabe and Lighting Districts shall be filed with lhe City Engineer prior to tinal map al:qxovalor issuance of building permits whichever _oc~_jrs first. Formation cost~ shall be home by the developer. 3. All reduired public land~,,aptng and In, lgetion systems Shall be oontinuaJsl,/maintained by the developer until accepted by ~e City. 4. PadMay lan~ on tha lollowing ~met($) ~ oonlon'n to the results of the respective Beautilication Ma~ar Plan: / / O. Drainage and Flo~I Control V/' 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located witl~in a Flood Hazan:l Zone; !l~refore, flood protection meaaums ~ be ~ as oartitled by a rig~ta,'r.d Civil Engineer and V// 2. It shall be the deveioi3er's resl:3oneibi~ty tO have the current FIRM Zone ~ designation ran~ved from the project area. The develo13ees engineer Shall prepare all necessary repo~l~, plane, and ~d~t~g!¢/t~/~raull¢ caloulatlone. A Conditional Letter of Ma13 Revision (CLOMR) shall be o0lained from FEMA ~ to final map al:qi3mval or issuance of building permils, whichever oocum fi~t. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, wfiio13ever oc.x~rs first 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to fina, map a130roval or ~ issuance of building permits. whichaver occurs litst. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by tha City Engineer. / SC - 2/91 t l of 12 V;/4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work w~thin ~ts rKJht-ol-way. ~// 5. Trees are prohibited within $ feet of the outside diameter of any publiC storm drain pipe measured Irom the outer edge el a mature tree trunk. V/ 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey eveallows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities V'/' 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone. and calm 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water DistrOt (CCWD), Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection DistrOt, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemarclino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichaver occurs first. / / / / / / / / __/ / Q. General ReClUiremento lnd AIN)rovlI8 1. The separme parcels contained within the project Ix)undarles shall be Jogally comiCned into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use cldveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits. whichever _o,'~__,rs first, Ior: 3. Prior to approval of the final map i dOlX)Sit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of a131=ortiofiing the a~essmems undor Assossment ~ among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwancla/San Sevaina Area Regional Maininc, Secondary Regional, and Master PMn Drainage Fees shall be paid I:N'ior to final ma~ approval or plier to J)uildi/~ pIIIlllit JSSLJanco It no rna~ is involved. 5. Permits shall be olXai/wcl from the lollowing agencies lor work within their right-of-way: / / _./ / 6.A signed Gom4nl and walve~ Iorm to Join and/or lonTt the Law Entorooment Community Facilities Diitrffit shall Ix filed with the City Engineer prior to final meG) al:qXovai or the Developer. Prior to linalizltion of any clevaloGb,~m,~t phial, SUfficient improvement plan8 shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage pmtocben to the satisfaction of the Cily Engineer. Phase Ix)undlrles shall (x,,,611~ond to lot lines shown on the ~ tentative real). 2/91 12of 12 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13951, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP LOCATED NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE, EAST OF BERYL STREET, AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1062-111-03 THROUGH 06; 1061-761-03; 1062-061-01 AND 02. A. Recitals (i) New World Management, Inc. has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 13951 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 14, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution Nos. 91-114 and 91-115 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 13951 and the associated Design Review. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent Development Code. approval of the d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNIHG COf94ISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13951 - CHOU July 2~3, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract ADDlicant Expiration TT 13951 and Design Review Thereof New World August 14, 1994 Management, Inc. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPRO%r~D ~ND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PL/~NNING COF~4ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST:: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15172 - JERRY COCHRAN - Time extension for the development of a 20-unit condominium complex on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APN: 207-251-22. Related File: DR 88-03 BACKGROUND: On August 17, 1988, the City Council approved Development Review 88-03 for the development of a 20-unit apartment project. The approval established, subject to certain conditions, the Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations for the project. Additionally, a one- year time extension was approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, ~990, subject to the applicant agreeing to establish or participate in a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for school facilities. Subsequently, the applicant decided to pursue a "for-sale product" as opposed to rental units. As a result, the applicant filed this Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes which was approved by the Planning Comission on July 10, ~991, with a two-year time limit. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time extension to expire on July 10, 1994. Provisions of the Development Code allow for time extensions in twelve month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. The applicant may request two additional time extensions to extend the map until July 10, 1996. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets the Basic Development Standards of the Medium-High Residential District. The provisions of Ordinance No. 465 (i.e., the new Multi-Family Development Standards) do not apply to time extension requests. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: That there have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Development Code, or the character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to beoome inconsistent or non-conforming; and ITEM F PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR TT 15172 - JERRY COCHRAN July 28, 1993 Page 2 That the granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Time Extension for Tentative Tract 15~72 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Planning Commission Resolution No. 9~-99 City Council Resolution 88-505 Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-117 Resolution of Approval JW. ENGINEERING, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER JW May 28, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 TRACT NO. 15172 Enclosed is a check in the amount of $540.00 to extend the approval of the above refezenced project. We are requestinG a one year extension for this tract. This will allow the necessary time required to obtain approvals that have expired. I would appreciate your processing this request as soon as possible. I f you requi re undersigned. JW Engineering additional information please contact the 140.31 guraext JUN 0 ') 1~B3 9g "C" Strut, Suite ~ · Upland, ~11fomla 917~ · ~14) ~ NINTH ~ STREET CHAFFEE '" STREET ,i' MAIN STREET  , , PROJECT ~ SITE k ~ EIGHTH STRE / ~--,~ ~ ~ CITY ITEM: /~ /..~'/7,~" TITLE: 6'/,,~' ~/"J/-/,~,~,r/,~v' EXHIBIT: .,~-Z. SCALE: ITEM: .~' /~'~'~ TrrLE: EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: F~ r ITEM: .~' EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: CITY OF CAMONGA PLANI~~~ION i ."'.'.~.>,, ., ITEM: ~' Trl~ -~-: ~~,~ EXHIBIT: ZP SCALE: CiTY ITEM: TrrL,E: EXHIBIT: SCALE: oo RESOLUTION NO. 91-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA/~IFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15172 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20-UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-251-22. A. Recitals. (i) Jerry N. Cochran has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15172 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 10th of July 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, east, and west is designated for residential uses. The property to the north and east is developed with single family residences. The property to the west is developed with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated for railroad purposes and residential uses and developed with railroad tracks operated by Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and is vacant; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-99 TT 15172 - JERRY N. COCHRAN July 10, 1991 Page 2 (d) The development of 20 apartments on 1.08 acres of land is consistent with the Medium-High Residential land use designation of the Development Code and the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Division 1} All applicable conditions contained in Resolution Nos. 88-117 and 90-106 shall apply. 21 Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-99 TT 15172 - JERRY N. COCHRAN July 10, 1991 Page 3 3) Property Maintenance: Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of all buildings, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, recreational facilities, and other improvements in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the surrounding areas. In addition, Multiple Family Residential Developments subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain site improvements in compliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval imposed by the Planning Commission. 4) Visitor Parking: Visitor parking shall be clearly delineated through proper signage to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Signage may include, but is not limited to: individually labeling each parking stall with the words "Visitor Parking" on the pavement surface, free-standing signs designating the stalls as visitor parking, and directory signs guiding visitors to the visitor parking area. En~ineerin~ Division 1) Construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue. The developer is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of construction of the off-site improvements upon development or redevelopment of the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage basis (minus street dedication) for the benefited properties. 2) Landscaping to cover the entire parkway area along the west side of Sierra Madre Avenue from the block wall to the curb shall be provided. The landscaping shall be maintained by the Condominium Owners' Association. 3) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed and an easement provided to convey flows from Sierra Madre Avenue through the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) A 15-foot easement for the future master planned storm drain shall be dedicated along the south property line of the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-99 TT 15172 - JERRY N. COCHRAN July 10, 1991 Page 4 5) The storm drain easements shall be accessible by City vehicles. Landscaping within the easements shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6) An easement over the internal drive aisles shall be provided to the City to ensure access for City maintenance vehicles to the City storm drain easements. 7) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication lines), within the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad easement, shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project site. s) Main Street abutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn-around (18-foot radius) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 1991. PLANNING COMM~SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad. Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) ~8~-18~1, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits 1. Al~roval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted sub~sct to the approval of 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate orcause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolection District to finance construction and/or maintenance ot a fire station to serve the deveioprnant. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of !ha Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The eduipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all ap~icable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation ol the final map ocours. Prior to recordation of the final map or tim issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the astablishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary School facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District. the ap131icant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to tha recordation of the final map or tt~e issuance ol building permits, whichever comes lirst. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recx)rdation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. / / / / sc-2/9~ ior12 P/~) v/ 6~ This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all artected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this proiect. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, wrltlen certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to linal map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. C .~m pi¢ u~.m D~te / / B. She Development V/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans. architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. ,/ m / Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitled for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parmits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other al:~icable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building PenTtit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and apl:)coved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method ot shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. / ,1 / / / / / / ,/ 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be tor individual units with all receptacles shielde~l from public view. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and tl~e number of trash receptacles Shall be sul:)~Ct to City Planner review and ap13roval pnor to issuance of building permits. ~ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out ol public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / / / / S4:~ - 2/9l 2 or i2 ~-'1 "~ J 11. Street names shall be submitted lor City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units sl~all be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. I / 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval ot street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. / J 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping ol said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option ol keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to beards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles o! Incorporation ol the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prk~r to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to Ihe City Engineer. 16. All part<ways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof ol this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ~",&,c/..c/Cv,~;' ~ ,A~4,~'~,,~y ~ 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated !or the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions 1or the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the linal map or issuance of permits, whichever comas first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shaOows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, excep~ Ior utility wires and sirrtilar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. / /__ / / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landma~ Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal o! landma~ trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. / / C. Building Design An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and lot heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial developrnent shall be suPl:)Mmented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance ol building permits. / All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surlace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance o! building pen'nits. ,/ ,/ D. Parking ,/ ,/ ,/ Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to Ihe satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. / /. and Vehicular Access (Indlcete details on I~ulldlng plans) 1. All parking ldl landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). / /__ 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ----/ / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, _.._/ / . entrances, and exits shall be stdped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers ff driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. ~ 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publlch/maintained landscape areas, reMr to Section N.) ,// 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case ot residential development, shatl be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lit sulxlivision. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ac_~o_ rdance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The epplicant shall folliw all of Ihe arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. ,/ ,/ Aminimumof ,.,K'~) treespergrossacre,comprisedoftheloliowingsizes, shall be provided within the projecl: ~ %. 48- inch box or larger, .'F' % - 36- inch box or larger, ~ % - 24- inch box or larger, 7~ % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon. A minimum of ,.,4',~ % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees- 24-incfi box or larger. Within parking tits, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gation tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% ol the parking area at solar noon on August 21. / / 54:: * 2/9 ! v/ 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to ancl along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less titan 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation sy~em to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. AIIprivateslopesinexcessofSfeel, butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof 2:1 orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. if. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. ot slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and Ihrtving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, propeW owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenarme of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shell be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant matedal shall be repieced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requirement shell be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design o! the perimeter parkways, walls, larldscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans am shall be subject to City Planner review and aporoval and coordinated for consistency with any pa~way landsca,oing plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscaloe features such as mounding, alluvial rock, si~ecimen size trees, meander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensillad landeceping, is required along Com~icu~m / / / / / / / / / / / / 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area sitall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submiaed for City Planner review and approval Drior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shell encourage the natural growth ct~aracterisfics of the selected tree apecies. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of Xensca,oe as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Munici13al Code. / / / / / / 5C-2/9t §o1'12 ~"'~,~ F. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only anc~ not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pnor to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance ol building permits. G. Environmenial 3o The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as dstermmed by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone lot the Red Hill Fault, in a standard formal as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final repen shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if a,ol~ro13date, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/ 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standards. v/' 2. Ernergencyaccessshallbeprovided, mainfenance free and clear, a minimumof26feetwlde at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending coml:)letion of required fire protection system. The ap;)licanf shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine Iha appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Muiti-lamily resldenfial deveio13ments shall provide a solid ove~ead structure for mail boxes with adequate lignting. The linal location of the mail boxes and the design of the overtread structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / / / / / / .__/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be oblained from tha San Bernardino County Department of Environmenfal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Pen'nits, and prior Io issuance of building permits. / /.l APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest a(X)pted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Cocle, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. S~Jch lees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautitication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing developmeN, the applicant shall pay development tees at the established rate. Such lees may include, ~ are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, alter tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. d. Existing Slructure~ ,/ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations Ior the intended use or the building shall be demolisl'~d. 3. Existing sewage disposal lacilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the Uniform Pluml)ing Code and Uniform Building Code, 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and slx3~wn on building plans supmiffed 10r building permit ap131ication. K. Gracllng Grading of the subject proparty shall be in ac_co_rdance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standarcls, and accel~ed grading practices. The linal grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The developmenf is located within the soil erosion control poundaries; a Soil Distud3ance Permit is required. Please contact San Berna~ino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of sucfi permit shall be submiffed to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. ,/ A geological report shall be prepared by a quailtied engineer or geologist and submiffed at the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and a,oproved prior to issuance of building parmits. 2/91 /, / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 6. As, a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Salety Division prior to final map approval and prior to !he issuance of grading permits. b. ,N3propdate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-sile drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed pnor to iss~Jance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted lo the Building and Safety Division for approval prior Io issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an increroental or composite basis.) e. All Slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical heignt shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control Ul:X3n completion ol grading or some other alternative mat hod of erosion control shall be completed IO the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation systero shall be provided. This requirement Ooes not release the al:~)licantJdeveloper troro compliance with the slope planting requiramants of Section 17.08.040 1 of lhe Development Code. / / __J / / / / / ~_PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Acceee ,/ Rignts-of.way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans an(I/or tentative map. Dedication shall be roade of the following rigNs-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): i/A/~'/.4~/.~ total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 2/91 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for for all private streets or drives. -foot wide roadway easement shall be roade / / Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensudng access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recon:led concurrently with Ihe map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. / / / ,/ 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provi(~ed and shall be delineated or noted on the final map, 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a I O-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rignts-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public rignt-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private propeW. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face o! curbs. if curb edjac, ent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11 · The developer shell make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessan/to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submitlal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreernent to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires tho property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incun'ed by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash del:x3sit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by Ihe City prior to commencement ol the appraisal. M. Street Improv~rnentl All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, pasoos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all hall-section streets. Construct the following pedmet®r street improvements including, but not limited to: / / / / / / / / / / ClJ3~B & &C. SIDE DRI!/~ S'I'R~['T =iz't~.:[ COMM. M~DIAN OTHER OU'~"ER PVM'T WAU(. APPR. [JGH'1~ TE~Y.~ TRAIL ISLAND ,/ v/ ./ / S~-2/9[ Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be delermined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (el) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. v/' 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval orthe issuance of buitding permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, tees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained Irom the City EngineeKs Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. do Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which intemect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othen~ise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3.inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City '* Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain oben to traffic at all times with adequate detours quring construction. A street closure pen'nit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satislaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewak drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Slreet names shall be appn3ved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans par City Standards for all private streets Shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work tming pedormed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from tbe City Enginaer's Office in acidition to any other permits required. __ 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. / / / /__ / / / /____ / / / sc- 2/91 10 of 12 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plottecl for all project intersections, including driveways, Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines o! sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the lollowing right-of-way: / / / / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the issuance of building permits: /_ / N. Public Maintenance Area~ 1. A separate set ol landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed info the Landscape Maintenance District: / 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: / / / / O. Drainage and FIo~l Control The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, 11oed protection measures sl'mll be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone desKjnation removed from the project area. The developeKs engineer shall pre13are all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA I:~or to final map ap13roval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter o! Ma13 Revision (LOMR) shatl be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and a,oproved by the City Engineer prior to final map apDroval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. / / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for worl< within ~ts right-of-way. y/ 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outsMe diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. v/ 6. Public stonm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Util~ Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. / / /__ v/ 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __.J /.__ v/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance Imm the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance ol permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into '--/ / one parcel prior to issuance of building parmits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or / / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. / / 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan ~ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentalive map. / / RESOLUTION NO. 88-505 A RESOLUTION OF T~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO OJ CAMDNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A DEV~-,-OPMENT REVIEW. NUMBER 88-03, TO PERMIT A 20-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM- HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET A. Recitals (i) Alan Smith. on behalf of the A.E. Smith C~mpany. has filed an application for approval of Development Review 88-03 described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereafter, in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the Development Review". (ii) On June 22, 1988, the Planning C~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Development Review, and roll,in8 the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 88-117 thereby approving the Development Review. (iii) The appllcant has filed a timely appeal of the approval represented in said Resolution No. 88-117 on the basis of two (2) Conditions contained in said Resolution. The Conditions appealed are described as follows: The requirement to obtain off--site dedication and construct street improvements (Condition No. 1 - Engineering Division). be The requirement to pay an in-lieu fee for the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (Condition No. 6 - EngineerinS Division). (iv) On August 3, 1988. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc-~onga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the Development Review and, on said date. concluded the public hearing. (v) oc cuffed. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution hawe B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found. determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of R~pcho Cucamonga as follows: Resolution No. 88-505 Page 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby f~_nds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Enviro~nental Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated negative Declaration issued on June 22, 1988. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced August 3, 1988, hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced June 22, 1988, Planning Canmission meeting and the contents of Planning Canmission Resolution No. 88-117 this Council specifically finds as follows: The Development Review applies to property. located at the terminuses of Main Street and Sierra Madre Avenue (APN 207-251-22) within the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre); The property to the north, west and south of the subject site is within the Medium-High Residential Development District and is currently developed with single family homes and apaz~nent units to the north and west, respectively, with the A.T. & S.F. railroad and vacant land to the south; The Development Review contamplates the development of a 20-unlt apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land; The requirements of Planning C~-~ssion Resolution No. 88-117 (Condition No. i - Engineering Division) that the Developer obtain off-site dedications and construct street improvements and (Condition No. 6 - Engineering Division) pay an in-lieu fee for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities remain an important and necessary condition; and ee The Development as specified will not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Flan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and wou/d not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the i,,,ediate vicinity of the subject site. ~. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearinS and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1. 2 and 3 above. this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: The Development Review is consistent with the Genera/ Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cuc~monsa; Resolution No. 88-505 Page 3 The design or improvements of the Development Review is consistent with the Geners/ Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; The subject site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; The design of the proposed development is cause substantial enviror~ental damage or to humans or wildlife or their habitat; not 1Lkely to evoidable injury The development is not likely to cause serious health problems; and The design of the development will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large. now of record, for access through or use of the proper~y within the proposed development. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Development Review subject to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Cc~mission as Resolution No. 88-117 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A"). 6. The Council hereby provides notice to Alan Smith of the A.E. Smith Company that the time within which judlciel review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civi/ Procedure Section 1094.5. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Hall. Re~urn Receipt Requested. to Alan Smith at his address as per City records. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPi'~u this 17th day of August, 1988. Stout, King, Wright AYES: Brown, NOES: None ABSENT: Buquet Dennis L~ Stout, Mayor Resolution No. 88-505 Page 4 Beverly/A. Authelet, City I, BEV~Y A. AUTHELET, CIT~ CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C~lifoznia, do hereb~ certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly pas~sed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of August, 1988. Executed this California. 18th day of August. 1988 at Rancho Cucamonga, .. Beverly A. Authele~, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 88-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-03, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET - APN: 207-251-22 A. Recitals. (i) Alan Smith has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 88-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street and is presently vacant; and {b) The property to the north, east, and west is designated for residential uses. The property to the north and east is developed with single family residences. The property to the west is developed with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated and developed with railroad tracks operated by A.T. & S.F.; and (c) complies with all Cucamonga; and The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, minimum development standards of the City of Rancho (d) The development of 20 apartments on 1.08 acres of land is consistent with the Medium-High Residential land use designation of the Development Code and the General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) A spa/jacuzzi shall be provided. The location, size, and design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. (2) The roof "eyebrows" on the rear elevation of the garage shall be enlarged to be more in scale with the building or shall be eliminated. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (3) The following items shall be incorporated into the final landscape plans which are subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 3 (a) Accent treatment shall be provided at the entry off Sierra Madre Avenue. (b) Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the site boundaries, particularly the north and east boundaries. (c) A sample of the texturized pavement material shall be submitted. (d) A decorative block wall shall be provided along the south property lines. A wrought iron fence with decorative block pilasters or a decorative block wall shall be required along the north property line. In addition, the existing walls on the east and west shall be upgraded to provide a decorative treatment, such as stucco with a decorative cap. (e) The limits of any easements and their restrictions on landscaping shall be clearly delineated on the plans. (4) A final acoustical analysis shall be provided to address potential noise impacts from the A.T. & S.F. Railroad and any necessary mitigation for exterior and interior noise levels. The analysis shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division (1) The developer shall obtain the necessary right-of- way and construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the west side and shall cover the entire parkway from the block wall to the curb. The developer is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of construction of the off-site improvements upon development or redevelopment of the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage basis {minus street dedication) for the benefited properties. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 4 (2) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed and an easement provided to convey flows from Sierra Madre Avenue through the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) A 15 foot easement for the future master planned storm drain shall be dedicated along the south property line of the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (4) The storm drain easements shall be accessible by City vehicles. Landscaping within the easements shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (5) An easement over the internal drive aisles shall be provided to the City to ensure access for City maintenance vehicles to the City storm drain easements. (6) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication lines) within the A.T. & S.F. Railroad easement shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project site. (7) Main Street abutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn around {18 foot radius) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING~O~ISSION OF TNE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA LarFy PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22rid day of June, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15172, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20-UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TMEREOF - APN: 207-251-22 A. Recitals (i) Jerry Cochran has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 15152 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 91-99 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 15172. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the Conditions of Approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent' of the Development Code. d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TE FOR TT 15172 - JERRY COCHRAN July 28, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract ADDlicant Expiration 15172 Jerry Cochran July 10, 1994 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the. 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-01 - SEELEY - A request to amend the Specific Plan by adding Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics as a conditional use in the Specialty Commercial District within Subareas 1, 2, and 3, and Pharmacies, with or without specialty retail, under 10,000 square feet as a permitted use in the Community Co~ercial District within Subareas 1, 2, and 3. (Related File: CUP 93-19.) BACKGROUND: At it's meeting on June 9, 1993, the Commission considered a request from the applicant to add health clubs as a conditional use in the Thomas Winery Plaza. The applicant proposes to lease the space vacated by Irvine Ranch Market and establish a health club (see letter from the applicant and the related Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit 93-19). The Commission determined that this type of land use can be an appropriate one in the Specialty Comercial District. The Commission directed the applicant to submit an application for an amendment to the Specific Plan so that staff can further analyze the merits of adding the proposed land use. On June ~'15, 1993, the City received both the Specific Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit applications. Staff took this opportunity to expand the amendment application to include the addition of Pharmacies under 10,000 square feet to the Community Commercial District. ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Amendments Add "Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics" to the Specialty Commercial District - Subareas 1, 2, and 3. In reviewing the land uses within the Specialty Comercial District, staff found that the category of Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios is conditionally permitted while the category of Health and Athletic Gyms and Reducing Clinics is not allowed. In comparing these two land use categories, staff found that their purpose is similar in nature, that is, physical fitness. Their operational characteristics are also similar in that they: 1) involve physical activity, and 2) have similar peak hours which is early morning, late afternoon, evenings, and weekends. Staff believes that adding this land use category as a conditional use will broaden the range of businesses in the Specialty Commercial District. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FSPA 93-01 - CARDIO-FIT July 28, 1993 Page 2 2e Add "Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 square feet" to the Community Commercial District - Subareas 1, 2, and 3. This proposed amendment is a housekeeping item. It came about because of' a request from a pharmacy, with under 10,000 square feet, who would like to locate in the Foothill Village which is zoned Community Commercial. When the Specific Plan was first adopted in September of 1987, Drug Stores and Pharmacies were permitted in the Community Commercial District but not in the Specialty Commercial District. This land use category allows businesses that range from small pharmacies to large national chain drug stores. In April of 1990, this category was amended by creating two sub-categories: Drug Stores and Pharmacies over 10,000 square feet and Pharmacies, with or without specialty retail, under 10,000 square feet. The sub-category of Pharmacies under 10,000 square feet was then added to the Specialty Commercial District as a conditional use with the intent of broadening the range of uses in this district. Staff believes that it was not the intent to restrict the smaller pharmacies in a Community Commercial District. Further, this sub-category is shown as permitted in Subarea 4 (see Exhibit "C"). Therefore, staff recommends that the sub-category of Pharmacies, with or without specialty retail, under 10,000 square feet be added back to the Community Commercial District as a permitted use. Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment of adding land uses to the Specific Plan is not subject to environmental assessment as staff determined that i~: is not a "project" since the action will not result in a physical change in the environment directly or ultimately. Refer to Public Resources Code Section 2~065 (CEQA Section 15378). CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution Recommending Approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-0~ to the City Council. BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Letter of Request from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Addition of Proposed Land Uses to Summary Table Exhibit "B" - Addition of Proposed Land Uses to Subareas l, 2, & 3 Exhibit "C" - Page IV-9.57 of Subarea 4 Resolution Recommending Approval Resolution of Approval (City Council) CARDIO FlY SPORTS CLUBS 7945 D-I Vineyawl. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 (909) 9T6-1777 June 8. 1993 CiB' of Ra~cho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 RE: Health Club FaciliB' 7945 Vineyard Ave., Suite D-1 Chairman and Members of' the Planning Conunission Cardio Fit Sports Clubs xvould like to present to the Chairman and Merabers of' the Plalming Commission of the Planning Commission our proposal for the addition of a health club hcilitx, in the Thomas Winery Plaza. The nature of our bnsiness is to provide health and fitness to the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, with a convenient location located in the Thomas Winery, Plaza in the area designated D-1 previously occupied by the Ranch Market The health and fitness business will generate a high volume of foot traffic tbr the center which will increase the amount of tax dollars generated for the Ci .ty. Our health club will also draw residents t~om nearby Alta Loma and may stimulate other merchants to lease within the center. Our societ'v is continuing to place great emphasis on a more healthy lit~slyle. More and more people are interested in a convenient facili~' in which to work out. CARDIO FIT SPORT CLUBS are providing the venue for them to attain their goals. We will provide cardiovascular equipment. circuit training machines, weights, aerobics, basketball. full locker roo~n facility, personal trainers and child care. Our primat3..' interest is to provide a positive influence for the Cid' of Rancho Cucamonga. We understand that according to the Foothill Plan, a health club is not permitted in the Thomas ~'iners.- Plaza. However, a dance studio and martial arts studio have been permitted to operate within the center and the health club business is very similar in nature. We at Cardio Fit Sports Clubs would like the Commission to review our request and consider amending the Foothill Plan and adding our facility, to the Thomas Winery Plaza. We t~el our health club facility will bring a positive influence to Thomas Winery Center and, of course, the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If you have any questions, please contact me. Steve Seeley SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITrED (X~ AND CONDITIONALl Y PERMn'TED (0~ USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES iii~i~!~i SuParea onei!iiiii!ii!! SuDarea Two iiiiiiiiliiiii SuDarea Three iiiiiiiiii:iSuDarea Four bakerlee. (re:ell cr'v: be." ar,c .~reaK',;c: b'¢.:~e ~ ,.er,-Ir: ar, c Phc:oc..'l:'. $er,,:.:es 13:ok GI': anc S:a:lonar;. , ~'-e- '.far acul: 'eJa:?,". ma:e-lal' ~X~ ~X XXX X Xx# XX xX XX x~ L~r.c, at,: ?3r,',?r-.l;)r, arleS .' a:er i.,,~ J' ,e..:aJ: I ic-~me-t~ , :l'~ca aria GlasBwareStore,~ ':~.'~:.'.'~ a". 'ree Sales Lc:: ,' ,.c:'~ra:lr,.; or a :am:era-', DasI$: CnUl'cncc -"¢.Ck:all L¢l.r. ge (car.lour. ge.:avern: I-,: IucIr.g reia:eC Cammere lal Pe,:"e~-: Icr ant t. lllar:~ Co-.'ale~ce;". I acl I'.ler. ape GCO O 0 C' 0 . (,' C ::. &'. C, D ~' C S t" D D C ~, ::, D S' x L'.a', C*,-eCe'te-':. ': ". ,", *" 0 C. C'. :'~ellca'.e.".c. em: arc Spo.:lal'.', Fccc (_Dr.g 5'.ores ape Pharmacies (~ a: over IO.O:,Osc ': (,,, C: :)na-mach;s wl:r'cr' I V-9.4 a SUMMARY TABI P OF PERMITTED (X) AND CONDrnONALLY PERMITrED ¢0) USES lETAlL COMMERCIAL USES (CONT.) Farmers Markets Floor Covering Shops Florist Stores Furniture Stores Health and Athletic Gyms and Reduclna CIIl~cs Hobby Shops Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X Janitorial Services and Supplies Jewelry Stores Laundry (Self Service) Leather Goods and Luggage Stores X Liquor Stores 0 Messenger and Wire Services Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studio Newspaper and 19agazlne Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores Paint, Glass an~ Wallpaper Stores et Shops Photocopy Record and Tape Stores Restaurants (slt down): a) With entertainment and/or serving oi' alcoholic beverages D) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail bar, entertainment or dancing) c) Care, limited to 20 seats (Including outOdor seating) d) Fast FooO: with drive-thru Shoe S:orec. 5a.e arc Pepal' Special: ~ Re:all Sportmr. bede'.. :' '.cre,. a) 5oeclal:, . eerln~ I I:r,rc. b) General el'ccmDas51rc a varle::. c' c0¢-::: eC,.l~,m.2r' SwimruthZ p ~~..'. ~ X x x i:i!iiiiiii~; x x x :ii:~.::!i~i!i:: x x x X X ?:~:~:~:!:!:i: X Subarea On~iii.lj.i. Subarea Two ililililiiiiii Subarea Three CC 0 MR P i!ii~!!!i!iSCCC 0 MRMHRiliiiiiliiiiiiSCCCCOLMRMR U MU X 0 X ~:~:!:!:! XX X X X X ~i~ X x !?x x XX X x xx dO ioo X 0 X X XX XX 0 0 Subarea Four RRC MR Lt X X X X X X X X 0 X 0 X Xe* x x 0 0 0 X X 0 X X X 0 % % X ~ X x X 0 0 X X X X 0 0 ~ x ,vlsed: 4/18/90 IV-g.4 b Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a temporary basis Churches SC CC 0 MR P X 0 0 0 Cleaning and Pressing Establishments Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment X X O O O Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O O b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X Day Care Centers O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X or without spe- ., [ cialt~y retail under 10,000 sq ft O ~ ~'aly rt el ta___.~ i under 110,000 sq~ Farmers Markets " X O O Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X H Ith a d Athl te'ea n ~c G~ X Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soc~a Fountains X X Janitorial Services and Supplies Revise~: 4/1 8/90 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use S C C C Candy and Confectioneries X X Catering Establishments X China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a temporary Basis X Churchas O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment O O O Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O O b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Centers O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X tail under 10,000 sq ft O Farmers Markets X Floor Covering Shops X IV-9.26 Revise¢l: 4/18/90 O MHR MR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATIOI~I SUBAREA TWO Retail Commercial Um- Continued Land Use Florist Shops Furniture Stores Hardware Stores SC CC 0 MHR X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 0 X X 0 X X X X Hobby Shops Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains Janitorial Services and Supplies Jewel ry Stores Laundry (Self Service) Leathor Coods and Luggage Stores Liquor Stores Messenger and Wire Services Music, dance, end martial arts studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores Nurserlea and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores Paint, (:;lass, and Wallpaper Stores Pet Shops Photocopy (Xerox) Record and Tape Stores X X X X X X X X X Revised: 4/18/90 IV-9.27 ;letall Commercial Uses * Continued Land Use SC CC CO LMR MRR U MU rug Stores and Pharmacies: "~',~ a) over 10.000 sq ft X ~/ b) pharmacies with or without spe- ., ~) cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft 0 X X X X X X X X Farmers Markets Floor Covering Shops Florist Shops Furniture Stores Hardware Stores H ealt~ an~and Weight Reduci linics ~ X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X X Janitorial Services and Supplies X Jewelry Stores X X Laundry' (self Service) X Leather Goods and Luggaage Stores X X Liquor Stores O O Messenger and Wire Service X X Music. Dance, and Martial Arts Studios O X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X X Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area X Office. Business Machine and Computer Component Stores X X Paint. Glass. and Wallpaper Stores X Pet Shops X X X O X Revised: 4/18/90 IV.9.44 ~ ~/~ · · ommec · Uses - Continued Land Use CC RRC MR LI'' Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a Temporary Basis X Churches O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment O O Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Centers O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X' ~,- Drug Stores and Pharmacies: ~ a) over 10,000 sq ft X X ~ b)' pharmacies with or without spe- ~/ cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft X X Farmers Markets X X Floor Covering Shops X X Florist Shops X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X X' Hobby Shops X X' Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 93-01 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING "HEALTH AND ATHLETIC GYMS AND WEIGHT REDUCING CLINICS" AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS l, 2, AND 3, AND ADDING "PHARMACIES, WITH OR WITHOUT SPECIALTY RETAIL, UNDER 10,000 SQUARE FEET" AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1, 2, AND 3, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Cardio-Fit has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On July 28, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ~. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 28, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and (b) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and (c) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSPA 93-01 - CARDIO-FIT July 28, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (b) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Sections 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of July 1993, of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01, as shown on the attached proposed City Council Resolution. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-01, ADDING "HEALTH AND ATHLETIC GYMS AND WEIGHT REDUCING CLINICS" AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1, 2, AND 3, AND ADDING "PHARMACIES, WITH OR WITHOUT SPECIALTY RETAIL, UNDER 10,000 SQUARE FEET" AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREA 1, 2, AND 3, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Cardio-Fit has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On July 28, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and recommended approval of the application to the City Council. (iii) On August 18, ~993, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 25, 1993, including written. and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and (b) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and (c) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FSPA 93-01 - CARDIO-FIT August 18, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (b) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Genera]. Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01, as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B. SUMMARY TABI ;: OF PERMITTED (XI AND CONDiTIONALl Y PERMITtED IO) USES RETAIL COtlrlERCIAL USES Antique Shops Apparel a) Boutiques D) General Appliance Stores anci Repair Art, MUSIC, and Photographic C:,.~.': ancl Supply Stores Bar~er anO Beauty Sho~s Clueprint ane P~otocopy Se~ ces 8oo~, Gift ana Stationary Stores (other than aoult re ateo materlal)~:=~=~ CanOy ano Confectionaries Catering EstaDIIshments China ano Glassware Stores Christmas Tree Sales Lots (oPeratlng on a temporary Dasls) Churches Cleanlncl anO Presslno Establishment., Cocktail Lounge (Darolounge,tavern) Inclucllng relatec~ entertainment Commercial Recreation: a) Incloot uses such as Dowling ancl Pillarels D) Outcloor uses such as tennis anO basketball Convalescent Facilities anO Hospitals Curtain anO Drapery ShoPs SuParea Oneli.li::il SuDare..~ Two iii::i!i::i::ii:, . Subarea Tnree~ i::iiih::{:::SuDarea Four :: ,:..: .~ :::::.::::~:._ ~ : ......: ............... ........ ..,:...,, ,. :::::::::::::.. :: .':';:' ..-.:. X X X X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X Day Care Centers 0 0 0 ~:~. Delicatessens anO 5Declaity Foocl ::~:.,.: ,,.~ Stores ~ X x :~'.~r~: X (..D~bg ~tores ano Pharmacies a) over I0,000 s~, rL x D) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail unc~er I 0,000 - so. ft 0 Y~ 0 Revlsec~: 4/1 8/go 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 X X 0 0 0 0 X X~ X X X x~ IV-g.4 a SUMMARY TAB;; OF PERMITTED IXI AND CONDITIONA; ~ Y PERMH ;,-O (0~ USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES iiiii!iiiiiiii Sul~area oneli[ii[ii[:i Subarea Two ili[~iii~111ii Subarea Three iiii~ii[i[iiSuDarea Four ............. ~:~ .............. ~ x x Farmers ~arke~s a~ x ~[~[~ x ~%~% x Floor Covering Shops X [~][ X ~]~[[~ X ............. XX Furniture Stores ~ X x ~[~[~:~[f x x .. ......... ~[~[~[~[~ x x HOWDy S~ODS ~f~: Ice Cream Stores an¢ Soaa Fountains ~:iii!~!i=[ X X aa~ X X X X Janitorial Services ancl SUDDIles iii/:ii~ii X iiiiii~ X ~!!!~!~ X Llouor Stores ............ 0 0 if.f.~i~i!i~i 0 0 Messenger ancl Wire Services Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Stucllo NewsPaper anO Magazine Stores Nurseries ana 6aroen Supply Stores within enclosecl area Office, Business Machine ancl Computer Component Stores Palnt, Glass ancl Wallpaper Stores Pet Shops Photocob¥ X x X x 0 X X X X x X x x X X X X X X X X Recorcl ancl Tape Stores X X Restaurants (sit clown): a) With entertainment ancl/or serving of alcoholic beverages 0 0 0 D) Incloental serving of beer ana wine (without a cocktail Ioun¢ bar, entertainment or aanclng) X x 0 c) Care, Ilmltea to 20 seats (Inclucllng outaoor seating) x cl) Fast Foocl: with orlve-thru without clrlve-thru x x X X 0 0 X X it x x X Shoe Stores, Sale ancl Repair Specialty Retail Shorting Goocls Stores: a) SPecialty; backpaCklngo tennis, skilrig, Mountain- eering, Fishing, etc. b) General; encompassing a variety of sports equipment Supermarkets 5wtmmlncl Pool Subbiles X x X 0 0 X X X X 0 0 0 x X 0 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 X x x x x x x X X X X X X 0 0 X X 0 0 X X X 0 0 0 0 X X X X 0 0 X X X# X X X X X X X X X# X X* X X 0 0 X X X X 0 0 0 0 X X 0 X X X X X X X X Revlsea: 4/18/90 I V-9.4 b ..Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a temporary basis Churches SC CC O MR X O O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball X X O O O O O O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals Curtain and Drapery Shops Day Care Centers Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X O X Drug Store~: a) over 10,000 sq ft X b) .pharmacies with or without spe- ~r~ etail under 10,000 sq~ Farmers Markets " X O O Floor Covering Shops Florist Shops X X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X H Ith d Athl t'ca ae~ ms~ X Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X Janitorial Services and Supplies Rewsech 4/18/90 IV-9.12 ~ 1 '~ P SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 3--o f Retail Comm®rclel Uses- Continued Land Use S C C C Candy and Confectioneries X X Catering Establishments X China ancl Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a temporary Basis Churches Cleaning and Pressing Establishments Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals Curtain and Drapery Shops Day Care Centers X X 0 X 0 0 0 X Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X O O O O O O X O O X Dr gu Stores and Pharmacies: a) over ~00.00 s_,., .. . X ~ b) hp arma¢'es w~ it orwh ithout spe- ¥ ~,/ ~tail uncler 10,000 sq ft 0 /~ X Farmers Markets X Floor Covering Shops O MHR MR O O O O O O O Revisecl: 4/18190 SUB. AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO Rel~il ComMercial Uses - Continued Land Use Florist Shops Furniture Stores Hardware Stores SC CC X X X X X 0 MHR X X X X X X X X X X X 0 0 X X 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hobby Shops Ice Crelm Stores and Soda Fountains Janitorial Services end Supplies Jewelry Stores Laundry (Self Service) Leather Goods and Luggage Stores Liquor Stores Messenger and Wire Services Music, dance, and mertlal arts studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed ArM Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores Paint, Glass, and Wallpeper Stores Pet Shops Photocopy (Xerox) Record and Tapa Stores Revised: 4/18/90 Retail Commercial Uaea - Continued Land Use SC CC CO LMR MRR U a) over 10,000 sq tt X ~/ b) pharmacies with or without spa- ./ /) ci Itya retail ndu er 10,000 sq ft O 7~ Farmers Markets Floor Covering Shops Florist Shops Furniture Stores Hardware Stores X X X X X X X X H ealthan~~ I and Weight Reducin g ~~"~ Clinics ~ X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X X Janitorial Services and Supplies X Jewelry Stores X X Laundry..(self Service) X Leather Goods and Luggaage Stores X X Liquor Stores O O Messenger and Wire Service X X Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios O X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X X Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area X Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores X X Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores X Pet Shops X X MU X X X X Revised: 4/18/90 IV-9.44 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 28, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-19 - SEELEY - A request to establish a health club facility with incidental services such as child care and tanning in a leased space of 15,730 square feet within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Specialty Con~nercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue APN: 201-101-25. (Related File: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 93-01.) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The site is developed with a 101,192 square foot specialty commercial center. It contains an Historic Landmark, Thomas Winery and Still Buildings, at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. The site is serviced by three streets namely Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, and San Bernardino Road. Surrounding Land Use: North - Single family residences and vacant land S0~th - Liquor store, fast foot restaurant, and vacant land East - Shopping center West - Vacant land (future Smith's Food shopping center) C. Parking Calculations: N~mher of Type Square Parking Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Congaercial Center 101,192 4.5/1,000 455 10/1,000 34 TOTAL 489 Nnm~er of Spaces Provided 525 The 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet is based on the recent revision to the Parking section of the Development Code. This flat rate assumes less than 15 percent restaurant users and less than 10 percent office users. The percentage of restaurant users in this shopping center is at 18.8. This 3.8 percent (3,381 square feet) difference requires additional parking at a ratio of 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet. ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-19 - SEELEY July 28, 1993 Page 2 ANALYSIS: General: Related to this application is Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01 for adding the land use category of Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics as a conditional use to the Specialty Commercial District. Once the Commission has considered the amendment and recommended approval to the City Council, then this application can be reviewed. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit will be valid upon approval of the amendment by the City Council. Staff has tentatively scheduled the Specific Plan Amendment for the August 18, 1993, City Council meeting. Be Proposed Health Club: The applicant proposes to establish a health club in the Thomas Winery Plaza. The business will take over the 12,030 square foot space vacated by the Irvine Farmers Market as well as an additional 3,700 square foot tenant space adjacent to it. The total leased space for the business is 15,730 square feet. The health club has a full range of physical fitness facilities (i.e., weights, exercise machines, aerobics, and basketball) and incidental services such as child care and tanning. The daily hours of operation are 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. The number of employees and management staff on duty ranges from 5 to 8. According to the applicant, the estimated maximum membership will be between 1,500 and 2,000 and at any given time the number of members using the health club will range from 45 to 60. Compatibility: A consideration in reviewing this application is the compatibility of its use to the surrounding uses and businesses. Since Thomas Winery Plaza is a specialty commercial center, most of the businesses in the center are single-purpose type retail, service stores, and restaurants. At present, the vacancy rate in the center is high, and the adding of a ~5,730 square foot health club will provide a sizable anchor. The West Coast Performing Arts Studio (CUP 90-44) is located on the second floor of Building F as shown in Exhibit "B." Since the hours of operation for this business are mainly in the morning and afternoon and the clientele are mostly children, staff does not see any conflict between the proposed health club and the studio. Staff believes that the proposed health club would not be incompatible with the surrounding uses. Code Compliance: The floor plan, as shown in Exhibit "C," indicates an aerobic exercise area. Staff is concerned with the potential noise and vibration generated by the use of a sound system and dancing. A condition of approval is included in the resolution to require sound attenuation along the southerly separation wall. According to the applicant, child care services are provided to their patrons only between the hours of 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 8 a.m. to 12 noon on Saturday. Staff is concerned with the safety and security of the proposed outdoor play area as it is located on the loading platform. A condition of approval is included in the resolution to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 9:3-19 - SEELEY July 128, 1993 Page 3 require the submittal of detailed plans of the outdoor play area for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Fire District has reviewed the proposed floor plan and found it to be acceptable in concept. However, detailed plans must be submitted for review and approval to ensure complete Code compliance. Conditions of approval have been included to require plan submittal prior to the issuance of building permits and the tenant improvement work must be completed and inspected by City and Fire District staff prior to occupancy. Environmental Assessment/Correspondence: This application is exempt per Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act. This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and notices have been mailed to the surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Con~nission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 93-19 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu] City Planner BB:NF,~jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from the Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval July 1.5, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civi~ Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Health Club Facility 7945 Vineyard Ave., Suite D-1 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission The daily hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., Saturday and Sunday from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. The staff will consist of one manager, four counselors, one receptionist, one child care attendant and one aerobics instructor. The maximum amount of employees at any one time will be eight. The number of members will fluctuate. At any given time, th( amount of members using the hea!th club will range from forty-five to sixty. If you have any questions contact me. Steve Seeley PLAI,~N1NG JUL 1 .~ IIIIIJl~ .--Ilill~lll IU FOOTHILL BOULEVARD POSTAL PLAZA LITTLE CAESAR S CHILD CARE MENS I RO0~ ~ ~O~ENS ~ -- ~C~R ~ BAS~TBA~ ~PRO~ 2000 S.F.  E~RCISE ~EA & T~NING ~EA FREE ~ox ~oo s.~ ~PROX 2700 S.F. SELECTORIZED (NAUTILUS) EQUIPMENT AREA APPROX I700 B.F. ~_~ 'l EQUIPME~ ~f" ~ / ~EA TOTE S~UARE ~OTAGE ' ' · ~ ~c~o cuc~o~ cA ~v~o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-19 FOR A HEALTH CLUB FACILITY WITH INCIDENTAL SERVICES SUCH AS CHILD CARE AND TANNING IN A LEASED SPACE OF 15,730 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-25. A. Recitals. (i) Steve Seeley has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 28th day of July 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 28, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue and is presently improved with a 101,192 square foot specialty commercial center; and (b) The property to the north is single family residences; the property to the south is a liquor store, fast food restaurant, and vacant land; the property to the east is a shopping center; and the property to the west is vacant land with a future shopping center; and (c) The proposed use will be compatible to the surrounding uses and businesses; and (d) The proposed use will not have a significant effect on the environment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93"19 - SEELEY July 28, 1993 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Plannin~ Division 1) Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-19 shall be null and void if Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-01 is not approved by the City Council. 2) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 3) Approval is for a 15,730 square foot health club with incidental services such as child care and tanning. The expansion or the intensification of the use shall require a modification to the Conditional Use Permit. 4) Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all applicable City ordinances, and applicable Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-19 - SEELEY July 28, 1993 Page 3 6) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the 7) The operation of the facility shall comply with all the performance standards in the Commercial and Office districts contained in the Development Code. 8) Noise attenuation shall be provided to the separation wall at the southern end of the facility and the adjacent tenant space to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 9) Any signs proposed for the facility shall comply with the Uniform Sign Program for the Thomas Winery Plaza and the City's Sign Ordinance. 10) Child care shall be limited to patrons only and shall not be open to the general public. 11) The conversion of the loading dock to an outdoor child care play area shall be subject to City Planner review and approval of detailed plans. At a minimum, adequate lighting and a security fence or wall to enclose the area shall be provided. Fire District/BuildinG and Safety Division l) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal's regulations have been complied with. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 2) Any modification to the approved plans after occupancy of the building may require additional review and/or permits from the Fire District and the Building and Safety Division. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93"19 - SEELEY July 28, 1993 Page 4 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of July 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: