Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993/08/11 - Agenda Packet
1977 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY AUGUST 11, 1993 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGAt CALIFORNIA (Bev) me III· IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Vallette Announcements Approval of Minutes July 28, 1993 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 - ROCKFIELD - A request for an extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 154 single family lots on 67.8 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Summit and Almond Avenues - APN: 226-321-01 and 11. (Scott) (Dan) VII. (Scott) VIII. VI. PUblic Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-14 - BUTTERS - A request to construct a 1,200 square foot second dwelling unit on .8 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepperidge Lane - APN: 202-041-58. Co CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-20 - EN AGAPE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP - A request to establish a church in an existing building totaling 12,825 square feet on 1.1 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9215 Arrow Route - APN: 209-012-09. (TO BE CONTINUED TO AUGUST 25) New Business CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - Review of the proposed integral public art for Foothill Marketplace, a previously approved commercial retail center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-27 through 43. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. Commission Business E. REVIEW OF SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING NUMBER AND LOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGNS - Oral report F. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN - Oral report X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond tha{ time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will be adjourning to a workshop immediately following in the Rains Room regarding Development Review 93-13 and Design Review for Tract 13316. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 11, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 - ROCKFIELD - A request for an extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 154 single family lots on 67.8 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Summit and Almond Avenues - APN: 226-321-01 and 11. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13566 was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1987. In June of 1989, the tentative map was extended for an additional one-year period and was due to expire on July 22, 1990. Prior to the expiration date, Phases 2 and 3 (112 lots) were recorded (October of 1989) which left a remainder of 42 lots unrecorded. Over $125,000 in off-site improvements were expended on the project which allowed the map to be extended for a 36-month time period (See Exhibit "C"). The remaining 42 lots are due to expire on July 22, 1993. ANALYSIS: According to Section 66452.6(e) of the subdivision Map Act, the applicant may request two additional one-year time extensions for the remaining phases. At this time, the applicant is requesting a one-year time extension which would cause the map to expire in July of 1994. Staff analyzed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based on this review, the tract meets the development standards for the Low Residential District. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for the remaining 42 lots of Tentative Tract 13566 through adoption of the attached Resolution. BB:BN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Letter from Joe DiIorio dated April 26, 1990 Exhibit "C" - Time Extension Letter dated May 31, 1990 Exhibit "D" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "E" - Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Resolution No. 87-126 Resolution of Approval ITEM A July 7, 1993 MS. Beverly Nissen CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post office Box 807 Ranco Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tract 13566 - 0 & 2 CITY OF RANCHO PL,~ r'Jf',l!N G JUL ], Z 1993 Dear Beverly: Rockfield Development Corporation, as the Managing Partner for the Rockfield Caryn Venture, which owns the property comprising Tract 13566 - 2, and TMP Investments, which owns the property comprising Tract: 13566 - 0, request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga extend the Tentative Map approval for Tract 13566 'for a one (1) year period so that the Final Map and Improvement Drawings can be completed and approved by the City. As you know, we have been coordinating with the City Manager's Office and the City Engineering staff on providing funding for the Wardman - Bullock Road Crossing (a.k.a. Lower Loop Road), the specific condition of approval that has delayed the recordation of the final maps for several years. We have recently reached a resolution with the City and The Caryn Development Company on an agreement to obtain the funding for the design and construction of this Crossing, with these funds being controlled by the City. So as. to complete this agreement for the funding of the Crossing, we request that the Tentative Map be extended for a (1) year time period, which should allow the completion of the processing of the Improvement Drawings and the Final Maps. Attached is a check for $549.00 made out to the City for the processing fee for this extension. Please contact me if you should require any further information. Thank you. Sincerely, Kevin Pohlson cc: Scott McDaniel -\tr66ext Po,,~t O~ce Box 215. So. [a~"una. CA ¢2677-0215 ©l~ce (~714~) 4.oo-5929 FAX ~7'14,,) 4_o9-51F3 April 26, 1990 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91720 RE: Expiration Date of Tentative Tract No. 13566 Dear Mr. Buller; Last year, Tentative Tract No. 13566 was extended for one year (new expiration date -- July 22, 1990). In November, 1989 the first two phases of this map (112 lots) were recorded, leaving a remainder parcel of 42 lots. We are in the process of conveying these remaining lots to Century American and Rockfield with a recently approved Parcel Map 13108. As this is a phased final map project with more than $125,000 in offsite improvements as adjusted, we believe the Subdivision Map Act allows the recordation of Final Tract Map 13566-1 to extend the life of the tentative map by 36 months. The new expiration date would be July 22, 1993. Please let us know the procedure for documenting the 36 month extension. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Best Regards, DiIorio President JND/iln \extend {{-.)<{'I'IDIT "D" /]- 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729, (714) 989-1551 May 31, 1990 Mr. Joseph N. Dilorio, President The Caryn Company P.O. Box 216 South Laguna, CA 92677-0216 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION DATE OF TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 [rear Mr. DiIorio: Pursuant to Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map, your project, Tentative Tract No. 13566, meets the requirements to qualify for the 36 month extension. Therefore, the City considers the new expiration date to be July 22, 1993. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. S, incerely, BB:mlg [NT DEPARTMENT Attachment cc: Russ Maguire William J. Alexander Charles J. Buquet I1 Deborah N. Brown Pamela J. Wright Dennis L. Stout Jack Lain, AICP "i ;XISTING;BA~IN NO. I EXISTIN~I BASIN No. 2 ;XISTING BASIN No, 3 CITY OF ' EXI8 · ~,~ ,BASIN No. 4 _.ANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE:-~,~"'~ L/M/l;r,'Ffl~/V EXHIBIT: L SCALE: ~/~,/-/' ,,~. ~-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: ,.~ SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 87-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13566 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13566, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Caryn Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 67.8 acres of land into 161 single family lots located at the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and Almond Avenue (APN: 226-111-02), regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 22, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13566 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific. plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. /+-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - CARYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13566, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: Community Equestrian Trails shall be provided along the north, south, and east tract boundaries. The precise alignment shall be shown on the final map which shall be reviewed and approved by the Trails Advisory Committee prior to recordation of the map. One Texas umbrella tree and six (6) Olive trees are approved for removal along the east property line and shall be replaced in kind on a one-for-one basis with minimum 15 gallon size. The Eucalyptus windrow along the north boundary shall be removed and replaced with columnar type trees as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Average lot size within the tract shall be 15,000 square feet. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation of the final map. Engineering Division: The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project (south) side of 24th Street (Upper Summit Avenue) shall be undergrounded along the project frontage extending to the first pole off site (north and east) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development on the opposite side of the street is not feasible, because the property is in the County. Notice of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscape Districts shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The developer shall submit a request for the vacation of Almond Avenue as shown on the tentative map prior to final map approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - CARYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 3 If the project is to be phased, the streets and drainage facilities to be constructed with each phase shall be as approved by the City Engineer. All interior local streets shall be constructed with a 36 foot curb separating within a 50 foot right-of- way. Sidewalks shall be provided on at least one side. Twenty-fourth Street (Upper Summit Avenue) shall be improved full width to include curb and gutter on the north side for the entire length of the project. Lower Loop Road from the east tract boundary to Cherry Avenue: Construct the roadway to include a minimum 26 foot wide pavement (2 lanes), full fill embankments for the ultimate roadway width, and full length culvert capacity to pass a Q100 under the roadway. b. If the tract is to be developed in phases: (1) Bonding for the total cost per (a) above shall be provided prior to recordation of the first final tract map. (2) The construction per (a) above shall be completed prior to occupancy release of any parcels in any tracts containing parcels south of the Lower Loop Road and/or the first two east/west tiers of parcels north of the Lower Loop Road. The developer shall make a good faith effort to obtain an easement for the roadway, however this requirement shall be limited by the provisions of Section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act. (3) Either the roadway per (a) above or similar improvement of 24th Street from the east tract boundary to Cherry Avenue shall be completed prior to the occupancy release of any parcels within the total tract. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - C/LRYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 4 c. Funding assistance for the roadway per (a) above shall be as follows: (1) The Systems Development Fees and Drainage Acreage Fees from the project may be credited toward the direct cost of construction of the portion of the roadway (including related regional drainage facilities) across the basin if so approved by the City Council. (2) A portion of the $500,000 off-site roadway construction contribution per County Tracts 13564 and 13565 (located to the north of this tract) may be credited toward the improvement costs if so approved by the City Council and County. (3) The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement for the cost of improvements from future development as it occurs immediately adjacent to the roadway; however, if credit against the $500,000 contribution per Tracts 13564 and 13565 is granted for these portions of the roadway, future reimbursements shall be made to the contribution fund and not to the developer. The roadway shall intersect Cherry Avenue as far north as possible to provide as much distance as possible from the freeway. The site shall be protected from off-site flood flows as follows or as other~se approved by the City Engineer: a. West tract boundary: Provide a structural block wall along the entire length, a minimum of 2 feet above and 3 feet below the adjacent natural ground to the west. In addition, the pads adjacent to the wall shall be elevated 2 feet above the adjacent natural ground to the west. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - CARYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 5 10. 11. 12. be North tract boundary: Provide a levee on the north side of 24th Street from the San Sevaine spreading grounds near 24th Street extending northwesterly a sufficient distance to intercept flows from the north, west, and east and not divert flows to the property to the west. The north face of the levee shall be hard faced and shall have sufficient longitudinal grade to be self cleaning. East tract boundary: The pads shall be elevated above the 100 year flood level within the basins to the east. The west bank of the north basin shall be reinforced to prevent erosion from flows entering the basin. Storm drain facilities shall be provided as determined necessary by a final drainage report and as approved by the City Engineer. The system design shall provide Q100 protection. A master plan shall be provided for the off-site area to the west. All facilities necessary to serve the area to the west that may be located within this tract shall be constructed to the tract boundary. The proposed storm drain within the rear of Lots 2, 3, and 6 shall be relocated to be within Streets J and K. A detailed alignment study shall be provided for the Loop Road from the west tract boundary to 24th Street prior to recordation of the first final map, The study shall investigate both the current Etiwanda Specific Plan "S" alignment and the proposed alignment curving to the north intersecting 24th Street at Wardman Bullock Road. All necessary street right-of-way required for the worst case alignment within this tract shall be dedicated on the final map. A detailed alignment study shall be provided for 24th Street extending a sufficient distance off-site to verify that the roadway is placed in an optimum location in terms of impact on adjacent properties, transitions to existing pavement, and crossing of the San Sevaine Basin. -// PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13566 - CARYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ~--'~,..7,' .. '; ..~'.;'/., t { Latr~T.'Mcg~e~, chairman ATTEST: '~er~~tary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, tICNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR THE FINAL TWO PHASES (42 LOTS) OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13566, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 154 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 67.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT {2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUMMIT AND ALMOND AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 226-321-01 AND 11. A. Recitals (i) Rockfield Development has filed an application for the extension of the final two phases of Tentative Tract No. 13566 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On July 22, 87-126 thereby approving, Tentative Tract No. 13566. 1987, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. subject to specific conditions and time limits, (iii) On May 31, 1990, the City Planner extended the application for 36 months pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452.6(a). (iv) The Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452.6(e) allows for up to 36 months of extension, in addition to that granted by Section 66452.6(a). ..(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TB FOR TT 13566 - ROCKFIELD August 11, 1993 Page 12 d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract Applicant Expiration 13566 Rockfield Development July 22, 1994 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST': Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ :~ ...... AUgUSt 11, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Bullet, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-14 - BUTTERS - A request to construct a 1,200 square foot second dwelling unit on .8 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepperidge Lane - APN: 202-041-58. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is presently developed with a single family residence located on the eastern portion of the lot. The parcel takes access to Hellman Avenue over an existing single family parcel by means of an access easement. A flood control channel cuts through the western portion of the site creating a physical barrier between the site and the adjoining residential units. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,200 square foot second dwelling unit, or "granny flat." The second dwelling unit will be located on the western portion of the site adjacent to the flood control channel. The unit is designed in a modified Cape Cod style with siding and a steep pitched roof. An attached two-car garage will be provided for use by the occupants. Access will be maintained over the existing access easement to Hellman Avenue. Be Applicable Laws: Under existing State law, criteria has been established for construction of second dwelling units on parcels zoned for single family residences. This criteria includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented. 2. The lot contains an existing single family residence. 3. The square footage shall not exceed 1,200 square feet in area. The structure shall conform to zoning requirements generally applicable to residential construction (e.g., setbacks, height, lot coverage, parking, design, etc.). ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-14 - BUTTERS August ll, 1993 Page 2 Any second dwelling unit that conforms to the criteria must be granted a Conditional Use Permit. Also, the second dwelling unit shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot on which it is located and shall be deemed a residential use consistent with the General Plan. Design Review Committee: On July 6, 1993, the Design Review Committee (Melcher, Vallette, Buller) considered the application and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: A tile roofing material should be utilized that compliments the proposed architecture of the new dwelling unit. (The applicant is proposing a thick butt asphalt shingle, see Exhibit "D".) The chimney should receive a decorative exterior treatment, such as a masonry veneer or horizontal siding, consistent with elements already proposed on the new residence. Do ~,vironmental Assessment: Staff has reviewed the application and determined that construction of the second dwelling unit is categorically exempt under Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECO~4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 93-14 through adoption of the attached Resolution. City Planner BB:SM::mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - B~ilding Elevations Exhibit "D" - Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval with Conditions July 13, 1993 To: Scott Murphy, Planner, Rancho Cucamonga From: Steve Butters Re: CUP 93-14 ('Granny Quarters") July 6, my wife and I met with the Design Review Committee (DRC). At that meeting, we accepted the DRC's proposal that we put concrete tile roofing on the 'granny quarters" we want to build. Although we, of course, will do what is required of us, we wish to request a reconsideration of that requirement. When I toll our architect of the tile requirement, she was quite upset. She says the house style is a modified Cape Cod and really should have wood shingles, but, that not being possible, asphalt/fibergless shingles would be an acceptable alternative. Tile would not be. She urged me to request a reconsideration. Besides architectural integrity, there are other pluses to using asphalt/fiberglass shingles: -.- Asphalt/fiberglass shingles are lighter weight than even light-weight tile. -.- The cost of ssphait/fiberglass shingles is half to one-third that of tile. -- Installation is easier. (My sons and I plan to do as much work on this house as possible-to keep it affordable.) We would plan to use 30-year, Class A shingles. They would not be the older, fiat, plain thi'ee-tab shingle, but 'dimensional" shingles with character and color. I have enclosed some pictures I cut from brochures I got at a roofing company. They show some very attractive shingle roofs. We regret the inconvenience we might have caused by our change of mind. We understand that the next body to consider our application is the Planning Commission. We would appreciate your informing the Commission, perhaps in your pre-egenda information, that we request to be allowed to use ssphalt/fiberglsss shingles. I will, of course, be at the Commission meeting to speak to this and any other matter that might come up regarding our application. Thanks much for you help. Stephen L. Buttere RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-14 A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 1,200 SQUARE FOOT SECOND DWELLING UNIT ON 0.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF PEPPERIDGE LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-041-58. A. Recitals. (i) Stephen Butters has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 93-14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit. request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 11th day of August 1993, the Planning Commission of the City .of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. E. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 11, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepperidge Lane with a lot width of 164 feet and lot depth of 156 feet and is presently developed with a single family residence; and (b) The properties to the north, south, and east are designated for residential uses and are developed with single family residences. The property to the west is designated for residential uses and is developed with the Beryl-Hellman Flood Control Channel and single family residences; and (c) The development of the second dwelling unit is consistent with the Low Residential designations of the Development Code and the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-14 - BUTTERS August 11, 1993 Page 2 (d) The application, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303 of the the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin~ Division 1) A tile roofing material shall be utilized that compliments the proposed architecture of the new dwelling unit. The final plans shall be reviewed by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 2) The chimney shall receive a decorative exterior treatment, such as a masonry veneer or horizontal siding, consistent with elements already proposed on the new residence. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 3) The second dwelling unit shall be developed and used in accordance with Section 17.08.030.E.5 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and applicable State law. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-14 - BUTTERS August 11, 1993 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: STANDARD CONDITIONS Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) g8~1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOllOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date o! approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / I / / . 3. Ai~roval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval ot .~/ / . SC - 2/9 ! 4. The developer shall comrnenco, pe~ticipate in, and cormurnmate or cause to be cornmenced, participated in, or consummate(I, a Idelio-Roos Community Facilities Distrot (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dleffict to finance conamction and/or maintenance of a fire station to sews the deval;p:,~aL The station shaJl be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the RailOhO C~ Fire Prol~ion District, and shall b~como the Districts property upon completfon. The equipment ~ be se~c~ecl by the DisUtct in accordance with Its needs. In ~ny building of a st~lkm, the developer stroll comply witll all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the Dist~l and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or perticipate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of neceseaq~ school facililies. However, if any settool district rtas previously established sucl~ a community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territot/of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes lind. Further, it the aflectm:l school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District wit!~in twelve months lrom the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entere~ into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Cemplction Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the pmposad project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. __/ / B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the al~roved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations. exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. / / 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _~/ / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until suchtime as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Fire Marshalrs regulations have been compllecl with. Phor to oc_-'P_,pency, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho ~monga Fire Protection Distrk~t and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shalt be inspected for compliance pdor to ~,x 6. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plane shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (suct~ as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and appl'.;-'-'.s Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. / / __/ / / / A detailed on-site lig~ing plan shall be reviewed and appeoved by the City Planner and Shariff's Department (989-6611) prior to the =asuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, haiglit, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall befor individual units with all receptacles sl~lelded from pulolic view. / ! Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City starxlards. The final design, iocations, and the number of trash receptaclas shall be sul:~ to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits, / ,/ SC - 2191 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, barming, snot/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. /~j / / 2 / 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopied Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All bullcling numbers and individual units shall De identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accomance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted fir City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not pmhi131t the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements firthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subclivlslona shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articiee of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever _oco__~rs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All pa~ways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acoeptabla to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted fir City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements Shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit Shall have the right fi receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units fir use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subclivlsion which shall be recorded concurrently w#11 the recoKlation of the IMal map or issuance of permits, whichever comas f. irst. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, struoturas, fixt~r~ or any other object. excepl for utility wires and · similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project comains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any furlher modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the tmildtngs or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Parrtit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. / / / / / / __/ / / / __J / / / - / / C. Building Dealgn An aitemative energy system is required to provide dameeric hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of .quivalanl capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools instalM~ at the time of initial daveiopmeht shall be supplemented ~ solar heating. Details shall De included in the building plans and Shall be sul~)mitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. ' SC - 2/91 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment su~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / /___ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. D. Parking 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacem properties and streets as required by trm Planning Division. Sucfi screening shall be architecturally integraled with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. and V~hk:uiar A~(~ (Indl~atl d~taill on building pllnl) All parking lot landscape islands shall I~ve a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavemeN across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/unitsrbulldinge with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. All parking spaces shall be double striped par City standafd~ and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. All units shall be I:~'ovlded with garage door opanars if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from t)ack of sldewallc The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless lhay are the principal source of tranaportatiofi for the owner and prohibit parking on Interior circulation aisles other than in designated vie#or parking ames. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and apGMovai IMor to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for pul)llcly maintained Ilndlcal~ areas, taler t~ ~actton N.) v'/ 2. o A detailed Immscape and irrigation plan, incaxlalg slope planting and model home landscap- ing in tha case of residential development, shall be prepared by a Ik=oneed m architect and submitted for Oily Planner review and approval priorto tiMissuancoof bullcling permits Of prior final map appmvai in tim case of a custom lot sutxlMaion. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be pratacted with aconstruction barrier in accordance with tim Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and su i-~.~ ed on the grading plans. The location of thoee trees to be preserved in ~ and now locations for tmnst~unted trees shall be shown on the detailed landsoapa plans. The ~ shail tolow all of the arbodst's recommendations regarding l~sorvation, trinaplanting arid tdrfvning metlxxfs. A minimum of trees pargross acre, comprMod of fi'la following sizes, shall be provided within tim projacl: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, ____ % - 24- inch box of larger, % - 15-gailon, and % - 5 gallon.' o A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be mn size trees - 24-inch box Or larger. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 1S-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. CuP __/ / . / /. __J / / / .,/ / , / / __/ / / / / / / / ___/ / / / / / ~ - 2/91 4 v/ Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along stnJctures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and ol 5:1 orgrsatersiope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landac~ and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gelion or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area. and al~rol~tate ground cover. In acldltion, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gelion or larger size tree per each 250 sq. if. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the deveioper prior to For single family residential deveinpmem, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer umll each incavictual unit is sold and _o,~_ _,pied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing ~ for thoss units, an inspection shell be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the pul~ic rigN-of-way. All lancisCal~ed areas Nmll be kelX free from weeds and debris and maintained in a heallhy and thatring condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shell be required per the Deveio~ment Code and/or · This requirement fill be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter part<~vaya, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shell be included in the re<Nired ~ ptlna anti shall be lut)iect to City Planner review and areroyal and coon~inat~ for consistency wlh any pafitway iancl! :~ k'lg plan which may be required by the Enginee~g Division. 13. Special landecape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, al3ecimen size trees, meander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensitisd landlC~l~.ng, is required along Proleer NO.: ~ "/,~ / / __/ / __/ / __/ / / / __Y / / / 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this PmieCl area shall be continuously malmalned by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If ioceled in put)lie maintenance areas, the design shait be coordinated wlm the Engineering Division. 16. Trm~ maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and · approval I~or to issuance of building permits. ~ c~teria shall encourage me natural growth c~aracte~stes of me selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation Shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as delinacI in ChalXer 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mun'~pal Code. SC - 2/91 5 F. Signe The signs indicated on t he submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of t his approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building parmits. G. Environmentat The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any prope~y. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, I:wior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, Ixfor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building parmits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and constructton techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agenclee ',// 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessShallbeprovidedin _a,-x_~prdancowithRanctx)CAJcamongaFire Protection District Standerd~. ,,/ Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minlmurn of 26 tset wide at all times during construction in accordance with Ranttin Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that ternrotary water suPPh' for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shall contact !he U.S. Postal Service to (letermine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ove~ead struclure for mail boxes with adequate ligNing. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of lhe overtmad atruclure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. . / / / / / ,, / / / / / , / / / / _.J / _.J / / / SO- 2/9 ~ For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obiained from the Sen Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of septic Tank Permits, and ~ior to issuance of building permits. / / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site DevelOl~nent 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plun~ng Code, National Electric Code, and all other applic, al~ codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative pemlts. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code AdolXlon O~llnance and Prior to issuance of building per~ for a new residential dwelling unit(8) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant sh~11 pay development fees at the established rate. S~ch fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautilication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Devek)l~ent Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, ~ School Fees. Prior to Issuance of building per~ for a new commercial or indu~t~tal development or addition to an existing cleveiopmer~, the aliicam shall pay clevelopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not Iin~lld to: Systlm~ Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Pern~ and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street acldresses shall be provide~ by the Bu#ding Official, after tract/pamel map recordation and I~ior to issuance of building I~. J. Existing Structur# 1. Provide co, diance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-~esi~tiveneu of existing Ix~ildtngl. K. Grayling v/ 1. Existing buildings shall be n~e to comiC/watt correct buMIng and zoning regulations for the intended use or the bull(ling shall be clemoli~hed. 3. Existing sewage disposal factlitle~ shall be remove(I, filled and/or ~ to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Bullcling Code. Underground on-site utilities are to be Iocate;I arxl shown on building plans su~mittad for building pem~il application. Grading o! the sul~jecl ~ shall be in ac~o~ance wilh !he Uniform Building Code. City Grad~g Stan~a~ls, and am#X~ gra~ing su~U~l oomomm~e w.h the al~ gra~g A soils ~ Shall be ~ by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. The develo;ment is located within the soil erosion comrol boun(Imtes; a Soil Disturbance Permit i~ requir.<l. Plem ~orlact San Bemar~Mo Courly Dfi~attmenl of Agrtcullure at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentaloft of auch pem~ ahall be submitled to the City p~or to the issuance of roug~ grading p~rm#. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engin#r or geologist anti subm#te~ at the time of al~licaion for grading plan cf~. The f inal grading plans shall be completed and appmve(I prior to issuance of building permits. __/ / __/ / / / / / __/ / __/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / DATE: TO: FRDM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AUgUSt 11, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Cole-~n, Principal Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-20 - EN AGAPE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP - A request to establish a church in an existing building totaling 12,825 square feet on 1.1 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9215 Arrow Route - APN: 209-012-09. The applicant has requested that this item be continued pending purchase negotiations with the property owner. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item for two weeks. City Planner BB:DC:mlg Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant ITEM C AGAPE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP Z7:'~':~_-- ,;'. (714) 987-1275 ',~-' d 20th Ju~y, 1993. The Principal Planner, Mr. Dan Coleman, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga. Dear Sir, We request that you withdraw the application before the City Planners for the C.U.P. on building 9215 Arrow Route, to be heard on August the 11th. At this moment we are unable to proceed. We hope that within 7 to 10 days this shall be resolved. We do appologise for any inconvenience. The .assistance you have given us is greatly appreciated and we wish to maintain a working relationship with you and hope that. this has not caused any great inconvenience. In ~is Service, Rot arta Thomas. Ch~.rch Treasurer. -- RECEIYE~. ~ITy OF ~:,, ,~1,-,, '3 JUL 2 0 1993 AM ~',Sm9~O~12ml~2~3~4~5~6 Pastor Harold Dewberry, EN AGAPE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP The Principal Planner, Mr. Dan Coleman, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga. Dear Sir, 9101 Nineteenth Street Alta Lorna, Calif. 91701 (714) 987-1275 4th August, 1993. REcEtVED Could you please resume the review of our application for the C.U.P. on 9215 Arrow Route, to be held on 11th August. We do hope that our altered plans have not caused you great difficulty and we thank you for your patience. If it is possible, could you please advise if the previously set date of 11th August, could be approved as the hearing date. Once again many thanks for your co-operation. In ~is Service, R~b~ta Thomas. Ch~rch Treasurer. Pastor Harold Dewberry, 1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 11, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner CONDITIONAL USE PEP~4IT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - Review of the proposed integral public art for Foothill Marketplace, a previously approved commercial retail center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-27 through 43. BACKGROUND: In approving the master plan for Foothill Marketplace, conditions of approval were placed on the project requiring the use of integrated public art throughout the center to reflect the familial and wine-making past of southern Etiwanda Avenue. This condition was placed on the project in recognition of the "Point of Historic interest" adopted by the City Council and as mitigation for the loss of cultural resources through redevelopment of the site. On June 24, 1992, the Planning Commission initially reviewed the integral public art program submitted by the applicant. The Commission approved the "concept" of the program but requested that detailed plans be submitted for the following: Four murals on ceramic tile shall be provided for the site - two within the eastern phase and two within the western phase. Plaques shall be provided within the eastern and western portions of the site. The plaques shall be designed with a narrative and informational focus rather than an art focus. Two welded grape arbors shall be provided at entries to the main plaza area within the eastern phase. Grape leaf patterns shall be embedded into the concrete around the grape arbors. A monolithic sculpture in bas relief and reflecting pool shall be provided within the eastern plaza. ANALYSIS: ae General: Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has met with the applicant and their consultants on several occasions to work out details of the integral art program. The program has evolved into the following: ITEM D PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS August 11, 1993 Page 2 Be Four murals, on ceramic tile, by Susana Sheid are proposed. The locations were previously reviewed by the Planning Co~nission as part of the Development Review applications for the eastern and western phase. Eight plaque locations have been selected. In most cases, the plaques will be located at roughly the same location as the structures that the plaques are commemorating (i.e., Guidera House, Orchard Filling Station, etc.). The plaque design was previously approved by the Planning Commission. 3 ,B The monolithic sculpture in bas relief and reflecting pool will be located as the focal point of the eastern plaza. The sculpture will contain several depictions of the wine-making industry. Two 20-foot high by 20-foot wide metal grape arbors are proposed within the eastern plaza. Leaf imprints of three different sizes will be randomly stamped into the concrete around the arbor bases by the artist to create the impression of leaves falling in the plaza· Historic Preservation Subcommittee: On July 21, ~993, the Planning Commission's Historic Preservation Subcommittee (Chitlea, McNiel) reviewed the integral art program with staff. The subcommittee felt that much progress had been made with the art program and that the City now has a program that meets the intent of the "Point of Historic Interest." The subcommittee recommended approval of the program subject to the following conditions: Staff should work with the mural artist to design an appropriate border/frame for the murals. Staff should work with the mural artist to ensure accurate historical content of the murals. The narratives for the plaques are overly vague and should be revised to provide more specific information about the structures and site. An elevation of the monolithic sculpture should be provided for the Planning Com~ssion. 5.. Staff should clarify the base detail for the arbors. The applicant may wish to consider providing a site directory within the plaza area showing the locations of the integral public art. 7. On plaques identifying the sites of specific structures, reference should be made to the City's "Point of Historic Interest" designation. 8. A cap should be provided for the sculpture. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS August 11, 1993 Page 3 Staff Response: contact with the information: Following the subcommittee meeting, staff has been in art consultants who provided staff the following 1. The sculpture will receive a cap designed with grapes and grape leaves. The ceramic tile color within the reflecting pool will be blue. The tile color on the outside of the pool will be green with the polished stone used in the center to highlight the area. 3. The base for the arbors will be designed using a sleeve in the planters. In addition to clarifying the details of the art work, staff has prepared plaque narratives for the Commission's consideration. Staff suggests these narratives are more descriptive in identifying the people and structures that previously occupied the site. Guidera Winery - Established on this site in 1933 in the family's garage, the Guidera Winery was an active part of the southern Etiwanda Italian wine-making culture. Owned and operated by the Guidera family, who settled in the area in 1928, the winery also produced under the name of Cucamonga Top Winery. Until it ceased operation in 1967, the winery produced dry red and white wines which were sold from a roadside store that stood just east of their home. Historic Route 66 Viticultural Com~/nity - In this the southern portion of the historic town of Etiwanda, the Campanella, Colombero, DiCarlo, Guidera, and Schiro families forged a community based on shared cultural background, faith, and way of life. These families pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling of wine in the eastern portion of the Cucamonga agricultural region in the 1920s and 1930s. The homes and winery buildings built by these predominantly Italian families that stood on these acres were physical reminders of the once thriving, family-based farming so historically prevalent in this area. Filling stations, garages, small retail wineries, and vintners' homes all faced the then two- lane Foothill Boulevard - that most popular and heavily traveled thoroughfare also known as Route 66. The Guidera and DiCarlo family homes were relocated in 1992 and the remainder of the buildings were demolished after being architecturally and photographically documented. Orchard Filling Station - Constructed on this site in 1925, the Orchard Filling Station was one of two filling stations in historic Etiwanda. Linked with the small retail wineries and homes of the area, the station serviced local residents, commercial drivers, tourists, and other travelers along the main cross-country route of the 1930s through 1960s, U.S. Route 66. PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF P. EPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS August 11, 1993 Page 4 DiCarlo House - Formerly on this site, the DiCarlo/Duffy home was constructed in 1927 as the residence for Nichola and Rosanio DiCarlo and their family. Living across Foothill Boulevard from their winery, the DiCarlo family were active participants in the southern Etiwanda wine-making culture producing DiCarlo and Eti-Vista brand wines. The house was relocated to 9805 Main Street, Rancho Cucamonga in 1992. Guidera House - Built on this site in 1915 for Joseph and Louise Campanella, the Craftsman style house later served as the home of the Joseph and Lena Guidera family. The Guideras located to southern Etiwanda in 1928 and became a prominent family in the small Italian wine-making community. Founders of the Cucamonga Top Winery, the Guideras were instrumental in the establishment of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church. The house was relocated to 9801 Main Street, Rancho Cucamonga in 1992. 6,, Cam~anella House and the Big Bear Winery - On this site once stood a cluster of structures owned by vintner Vito Campanella and his family. Constructed in 1923, the family homes served as the focal point of the Campanella family's business, the Big Bear Winery (California Bonded Winery No. 23). The family farmed grapes from which they produced and then sold wine on this site as part of a predominantly Italian eastern Cucamonga/southern Etiwanda viticultural CO.~unity. The home and winery structures were demolished in 1989. RECO~4ENDATION: With the modifications suggested by the subcommittee and staff~ the integral public art program is acceptable. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the program through minute action. City Planner BB:SM=mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site/Location Plan Exhibit "B" - Integral Public Art Program RANCHO CUCAMONC~ ~RNIA Developed By:. The Wattson Arno Company & Breevast U.S., Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY a. PROJECT SUMMARY b. INTEGRAL ART SUMMARY ART PROPOSALS MURALS FOOTWAY/CORNERSTONE MEDAIJIONS SCULPTURE ARBORS CONCRETE STAMPING RELATED STAFF REPORTS 1. SUMMARY a. PROJECT SUMMARY Foothill Marketplace Pa, h~ers was established in August of 1990 by The Wattson Arno Company and Breevast U.S., Inc. The Pa~/~ership was fo~med to develop a large retail shopping center in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The Center will encompass over 575,000 square feet of retail space developed over sixty acres fronting Foothill Boulevard. The Marketplace will have something to appeal and attract nearly for all shoppers. Ancho 'ring the project are two of the nation's strongest retailers; Price Club and Wal-Mart, who have purchased between them over 25 acres. To the east of these anchors Foothill Marketplace Partners will build Food 4 Less (50,000 sq.ft.), Michaels (17,500 sq.ft), PetsMart (25,015 sq.ft.) and approximately 24,978 square foot Office Depot. In between these Majors, Foothill is building shop buildings for smaller retailers and a plaza area for the shoppers convenience. Running along the 1-15 and to the west of the twin anchors, Foothill has planned for a Sport Chalet (36,000 sq.ft.), a major regional sporting goods store and for Circuit City (33,000 sq.ft.), a nationally known home electronic outlet. This configuration serves not only the traditional neighborhood tenants but also takes advantage of the proximity to the power tenants enormous draw. The Pads have met with great market success attracting tenants that include In-N-Out, Wienerschnitzel and Claim Jumper Restaurant. The Eastern 5.5 acres front Etiwanda and is ground leased by Foothill Marketplace. On this land, the market, 5,400 sq. ft. of shops and a pad of 6,550 sq. ft. will be placed. The property consists of approximately 60 acres located at the intersection of the Interstate 15 (to the west) and Foothill Boulevard (to the north) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The eastern boundary of the site is Etiwanda Avenue which is a major North/South artery in the area. The site was originally developed around 1900 by families involved in the wine-making heritage of the area. Most of the 63 acres was covered by grapevines. There were two family hames on the site. As part of our development, Foothill Marketplace Pa~iaers will place on site historical plaques, ceramic murals depicting the sites history and a sculpture representing the stages of wine making. · Foothill Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 b. INTEGRAL ART SUMMARY As part of the Foothill Marketplace Conditional Use Permit, conditions of development were added to ensure the preservation of the important agricultural and family heritage of the Etiwanda area. The conditions are as follows: o Project owners shall sponsor a City administered oral history program of the pioneer wine making families of the subject area. The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HABS/HAER Standards by an architect approved by the City. Project owners shall donate the Guidera and Di Carlo homes and pay for their relocafion to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel of land w/thin the City of Rancho Cucamonga and suitable for such a location of land. Project owners shah u 'tll/ze personal names and those of associative qualifies, such as winery names or wine label, on the project site whenever possible. The developer shall incorporate the familial and agricultural tssks of the area/nW commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine making past in a realistic style. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission. No demolition peltoits shah be issued for existing structures w/th/n the project site until the issuance of bufiding permits for any new structures. Project owners shall contn'bute up to $100,000 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of the City owned Charley/Garcia house wherein local whe industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. This submittal 'is directed at fulfilling condition #5 (familial and agricultural past). Foothill's integral art program can be divided into four sections: murals, sculpture, medallions and plaza. The following sections contain draft art, working drawings and relevant spec'dications. We would like to represent the founding families and the history that surrounds their efforts and sUuggles in the settling of this region. We feel the wineries, homes and other local surroundings depict this history and provide a tangible connection to the past. Foothill Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 ae ART PROPOSALS Foothill Marketplace will have an integrated architectural concept and a variety of landscape to enhance the Shopping Center. Main entry drives into the Center will be lined with palm trees and alternating Chinese Flame liees along with special lighting features. The architecture is Spanish Mediterranean/Colonial style featuring plaster walls, tile roofs, decorative columns with stone/file accents. At the pedestrian level, canopies and vined trellises alternate at the walkway. Paving patterns, accent decorative elements, rustic vined columns, hardscape features and storefront glass will enhance the shoppers paths of travel. A pedestrian activity center will be located at the intersection of Foothill and EriwandA~ an enriched pedestrian zone which links up to the main plaza area. The Marketplace will become a gateway to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The following proposals not only accurately porUay the sites history but additionally, have been integrated into Foothill's architectural themes and concepts. Through numerous staff discussions and public hearings (at both the HPC and Planning Commission) Susana Sheid was selected to create the center's murals. Susana was selected primarily. for her experience in the use of ceramic file. It was felt that this medium would not only create an interesting effect but would also be resistant to damage. Susana's artwork will be hand-painted on ceramic tiles. She has suggested 8" x 8" or 12"x 12" files for the murals. The uvfinished files will be made of raw clay so that underglazed paints can be used. Underglazes have the advantage of allowing for v~rant colors and rich textures. This process gives the files a "painring-like" effect After firing the underglaze, a clear finishing glaze vall then be fired to seal the surface. The advantage to this type of process is that the artwork will be impervious to weather due to the vitrificafion process (which fuses the ceramic paint to the file) by firing the ceramic in kilns. This will make the murals espec/aliy resistant to vanda!!~. from painted 8iaffifi. Submitted for approval are four artist drafts of the murals approved by Foothill, Two murals will be located in the Western Phase and two in the Eastern Phase. These works have been ritled: 1) 21) 31) 41) The Guidera house and wine store fronting Route 66 Joe Guidera and son plowing the land The harvesting of grapes with C, uidera cellar in background Pressing the grapes The locations have been integrated into the architecture and approved as part of Foothill's design submittal. Foothffi suggests the murals be framed in cast stone or ceramic consistent with the architectural details featured throughout the center. This type of frame is illushated on the following pages by selected elevations and drawings from Foothill's design rev/ew submittal. Foothill Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 ,1 ~ 0 ~ O~ 0 0 ~~ FOOTWAY/CORNERSTONE MEDALLIONS Through numerous meetings with City staff, eight locations have been chosen for medallion placement. These locations in the shopping center were chosen because of their prox/mity to the historical buildings or winery sites that have been relocated or monumented by Foothill. Following the direction of the Planning Commission, the staff has directed Foothill to gear the plaques and narratives toward a very literal recount of the events that took place on site. For reference, notes from the February 24, 1992 meeting are included in this section. Foothill has worked to develop the following narratives to portray significant and realistic features and / or events that have played an important part of the pioneering of the Cucamonga / Etiwanda area. A site plan locating the medallions in the center follows. All the narratives listed below have a direct connection to our site. It is our goal to present these emblems in such a way that will acknowledge the history of the past in a captivating style that will gain the interest of the public. Narrative # 1 located on PeasMart - Guidera Winery The Guidera family played an integral role in the development of the eastern Cucamonga / southern Etiwanda winery industry in the 1920's and 1930's. Cucamonga Top Winery served both local and Route 66 traffic. Narrative # 2 located on Office Depot - general Etiwanda area In the 1920's and 1930'S, the men, women and children of the eastern Cucamonga / southern Etiwanda region pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling of wine. Wineries, large and modest, composed a thriving majority of the Cucamonga / Etiwanda area's businesses and land uses. Na,,utive # 3 located on Pad 1 - general Etiwanda area The rise of automobile travel on Route 66 gave way to the parallel development of roadside d/nets, gas stations, and repair shops. Narrative # 4 located on Pad 2 - Orchard filling station One of two fillings stations in Etiwanda, the Orchard / Meier filling station is linked historically to the small retail wineries in the area and lies beside the most popular thoroughfare of the time; Route 66. Narrative # $ located on Pad 3 - Di Carlo house On this site, the Di Carlo house and winery buildings stood as reminders of the thriving family-based viticulture once so prevalent in this area. The house has been relocated to 9801 Main Street, Rancho Cucamonga. Foothill Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 -/7 Narrative # 6 located on Pad 5 - Guidera house Two houses remain as testaments to the Craftsman style as it was interpreted in the area during the 1920's. These houses have been relocated to 9801 Main Street, Rancho Cucamonga. Narrative # 7 located Western Phase shops - general Eftwanda area The Di Carlo, Schiro, Campanella, Ellean, Columbaro, and Guidera families forged a community based on shared cultural background, faith and way of existence. Narrative # 8 located on Claim Sumper - Big Bear Winery On this site, the Big Bear Winery was once located. Owned by pioneer families who~e descendants have stayed in the community, the home and winery were once a viable element in the area. Foothill Marketplace Project Informalion June 29, 1993 February 1, 1993 ATTENTION: FROM: RE: Quantity: Size: Details: Mounting: Finish: Mr. Phillip Ramming Foothill Marketplace Partners Linda Quinn Foothill Marketplace Bronze Plaques 8 Total 18"x 22" Beveled border/Raised bronze ivy design (as sisown in detail drawing) Metal support rods to be used/embedded into wall surface. Plaques will set on wall plane. Thickness to be dete,mined specifically at time of layout. It will be approximately 1/2 - 1/4". Script will be engraved rather than raised. Script will be patina dark brown bronze; the ivy design will be an oxidized patina greenish finish. Background of plaque will be left natural or polished bronze. Surface will have to be clear powder for protection against the elements. 1366 logan ave., ste. g · costa mesa, ca 92626 · (714) 751-6279 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUINN'$ CREATIONS BRONZE PLACQUES 4 METAL SUPPORTS 18" BEVELED BORDER SCRIPT ENGRAVED 22" RAISED IVY Ol-aiGN FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 1" : 3" The plaza, located between Food 4 Less and Michael's, will feature a reflection pool with a monolith bas-relief depicting the history of the area and the wine making process in picture story form. The carvings of a bas-relief take advantage of the contrast between dark and light areas. These scenes will be sculpted to illustrate a particular process of wine making and are not highly detailed. The artist, Linda Quinn, was selected because of her comprehensive treatment of the plaza area. Integrated into the plaza with the free standing sculpture are grape vine arbors and concrete stamping concepts. Linda submitted numerous sculpture drafts to Foothill for approval. From these, we have selected eight scenes for City approval. The reflection pond and sculpture base working drawings have been completed by The Keith Companies. They are included in this package for your review. Photographs of a bas-relief recently completed by Linda, is also included for your review. As part of the art to be featured in the plaza area, Foothill has suggested two arbors with welded grape tendrils. These will be located at the major entrances to the reflection pool area as illustrated in the following working drawings. To meet the appropriate scale, these arbors would have to be 20 feet wide and 20 feet high. The arch will be fabricated out of steel. The leaves will be stamped steel to resist weather. e. CONCI~,'TE STAMPING To complete the intended impression, Foothill has suggested stamping the newly poured plaza concrete with metal grape leaves. The leaf impressions will be made in the area surrounding the reflection pool in a random manner to create an impression of fallen grape leave~ Foothal Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 8 , ,, , ,~,,, ,...., If:, ..':,] ...:,.,.. : ,,~,~,: ' ,,,· . ....... · . ~ ~,, ~ ,~.,,, ,s, ·.~JA ·! '9,,~" " ' e.: I'"~.¥,d~. I',... ,._.=,~.~,.' ," ~ .,,..$., ~ , . . ~ .~: ·. ,.~_.~ /,":Z"~ _~-_. 5~ ~ ......' .....-~'~'i*~ ¥'-~?,. ~ ..~' - ' ;'~' .......5'. 'a'i ': ., ,;.',.:,~" .'-- ''~, · ,.~,, ,,..:,.~,.~..,.,., ....~ ~.~:~. ~;.,,,.,,.; .,.. ~,.....:,~. k.. [~-30 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3. RELATED STAFF REPORTS Foothill Marketplace Project Information June 29, 1993 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION MEMO TO FILE Date: File #: Location: Subject: PRESENT: · Linda Quinn Anthea Hartig Scott Murphy February 24, 1992 CUP 90-37 S/S Foothill Boulevard Btw 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue Integral Public Art Meeting Telephone Conversation #:( ) REPRESENTING: Quinn Creations City of RC City of RC DISCUSSION/ACTION The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the integral public art required for Foothill Marketplace as mitigation for the loss of historical and cultural resources with the development of the commercial/retail ~enter. As required by conditions of approval, the applicant is required to provide plaques, murals, a ,onument in bas relief with reflecting pool, arbors with grape tendrils, and grape leave patterns stamped into the concrete. All of these elements will be provided within the eastern phase of the development. Murals and plaques are also required within the western phase of the project. The design of these elements must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pdor to the issuance of building permits withiD' this phase. The following comments capsulize the discussions of the above-referenced individuals: Plaques: The number of plaques within the eastern phase should be reduced from 8 to 6. The plaques should be located at Majors 3 and 4 and Pads 1,2, 3, and 5. The possible descriptions for the plaques include the following: ao Major 3 - Guidera Winery Major;4'and Pad;1 - General Etiwanda Area Pad 2 - Orchard Filling Station Pad 3 - Di Carlo House Pad 5 - Guidera House The 2 plaques for the western phase are adequate. One should be located along the shop fronts and contain a general description of the Etiwanda area. The other plaque should be located at Claimjumper and identify the Big Bear Winery. Page 1 of 2 MEMO TO FILE (CONT.) The design of the plaques will resemble the bronze Point of Interest plaques used by the City (sample attached) with the following modifications: The plaques would engraved letters instead of raised letters. The letters would be colored darker to stand out from the bronze. A raised border will be provided and will be colored darker to match the letters. Applied metal applique should be considered as a border or framing element that would be unique to Foothill Marketplace. The minimum size shall be 18" x 22". Conditions of approval require review and approval by the Planning Commission. Because of the similarity to the City plaques, Scott and Anthea will meet with Brad Buller, City Planner to see if the design can be approved at a staff level to allow the applicant to proceed with the mold creation. The applicant should provide suggested methods/examples of framing the plaques./ne suggestion includes the use of a raise edge to frame the plaques. Murals The mural locations had been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission during workshops on both phases. The eastern phase will provide murals on the west side of Major 1 and the east side of Major 2. The western phase will provide murals on the west side of Circuit City and the east side Sports Chalet. The murals will be located within the arched area of the storefront arcade. The final design of the murals shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Con.mission. 2. As required by the Planning Commission, the murals shall be done on ceramic tile. 3. The applicant should provide suggested methods/examples of framing the murals. Reflecting I;)ool with Cylindrical Monument in Bas Relief The bas relief should be designed using the Etiwanda winemaking history. This was suggested, as opposed to the history of Rancho Cucamonga, based on the direction received from the Historic Preservation Commission. Indigenous Landscaging for Pl~?a Conditions of approval require the use of indigenous plant matedal within the plaza. Linda provided a list of materials to the applicant for consideration with the final landscape scheme. These materials are strongly encouraged. The final plant materials selected by the applicant will be considered as part of the plan check for the plaza. L) - Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 20, 1991 Mayor and Meebers of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Anthea Hatrig, Associate Planner POINT"OF~'~tNTEREST.,...DESIGNATION ~91-01 - 'A request to designate the Campanella, Gutdera, and OiCarlo vineyard. lands and structures located at 12573, 12601, 12617, 12675, 12705, 12743, 12777, 12801, 12807, 12811, 12821, and 12881 Foothill Boulevard as an Historic Point of Interest. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoa~ends that the City Council approve the Point of IntePest Oesigna(ion 91-01. BACKGROUND: The subject. properties came to .thg. attention~,ofr'staff and~ the Historic Preservation Con~nission with the~l~iYtal""bf'CUP 90-37 for the Foothill Marketplace project. As the Council is aware, the proposal specifies the development of over 500,000 square feet of retail use and in.cludes plans for a Price Club and Walmart. The Historic Preservation Comnission reviewed the site and the existing structures on December 6, 1990 and January 3, 1991. ANALYSIS: The legacy of the Italian felailies who 'settled and began to produce wine during the 1910s .and 1920s in this eastern Cucamonga/southern Etiwanda region represent an important segment of the wide range of wine-making activities which characterized our area's past economic and cultural life. The sites were included as part of the City's 1987 Historic Resources Survey and received a range of · designations; for instance, the Guidera home and wi.nery was determined to be a Potential .Local Landmark.. However, a. Co~.~ssion decision to reconmend landmark designation for the remat.n. ing. homes'and st-uctures on the proposed Foothill Marketplace sit~woul~ have faced objection from the site's owner/developer. Thus, rather/than recommending landmark designation and possibly costly analysis of adaptive reuse studies for on site preservation, the Coneission, after considerable discussion, formulated the recome. nded development-rel.ated mitigations for the 60- acre area. The recon~ended mitigations/'a~e intended to capture and maintain the region's historic diversity aa.d?nte..grity' With the Foothill Marketplace, the City has the rare opportunity to combine on a large scale historical land use with modern development. Through research, documentation, and incorporation of the site's CITY COUNCIL STAFF ORT POI 91-01 - CAMPAN~LLA, GUIDERA, DICARLO February 20, 1991 Page 2 history, the seven reconmended mitigations attempt to preserve as much of the past as possible while realizing the economic imperatives of growth (see the attached Resolution of Approval for mitigation specifics). In sunmary, the reckended mitigations are as follows: 1) An Oral History program, for example, will tap the in-depth and personal knowledge of the early pioneers and their descendants and provide the background for the creation of development-sponsored public art. 2) The Commission also reconmends a complete architectural documentation of the site's six structures as has been required of other projects requiring the demolition of historic structures. 3) Offering to relocate the two Craftsman-style homes attempts to ensure the continued use of the historic structures. 4) Contributing to the construction of the Chaffey-Garcia barn would ensure the preservation of the important agricultural heritage of the Etiwanda area. ISSUES: The Wattson Company, owners and developers of the proposed Foothill Marketplace site, have objected to the majority of the Historic Preservation Conmission's recommended mitigations (see Exhibits for the Company's letter and a response from staff). Contrary to Wattsoh's statements, staff and Conmission assert that the scope and intensity of this project, one of the largest recorded retail proposals, merits extensive measures to mitigate its impact. Furthermore, the C~m~ission's recenmendations will be further reviewed and analyzed by the ~lanning Conmission and the Council throughout the course of the project's development review. BB:AI4:sp Attachments: Exhibit "1" - January 3, 1991 Staff Report Exhibit "2" - Historic Preservation Conmission Resolution No. 91-01 Exhibit "3" - January 3, 1991 Historic Preservation Minutes Exhibit "4" - Letter to Larry Henderson from Phil Ranming Exhibit "$" - Letter to Phil Ranmlng from Larry Henderson Resolution of Approval DATE: TO: FRCI,I: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 3, 1991 Chaiman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Artrhea M. Harttg, A~sociate Planner CONTINUED PUBLIC HEA.RINGS FOR LANDMAJ~K DESIGNATIONS 90-03, 90-05, AND 90-06 - Resolution recommending designation of the project site of the proposed Foothill Marketplace as an Historic Point Of Interest with mitigations -- Point of Interest Designation 91-01: The Campanella,. Guidera, and DiCarlo homes and vineyards located at 12573, 12601, 12617, 12675, 12705, 12743, 12777, 12801, 12807, 12811, 12821, AND 12881 Foothill Boulevard, APN: 229-031-03 through 13. BACKGROUND: The Commission reviewed initially these City- initiated applications at its. December 6, 1990 meeting. After staff's report and input from members of the families who once owned and worked the land upon which the Foothill Marketplace is proposed to be built, the C~,,,,issioners directed the public hearing be left open and requested staff to draft a Resolution recommending to the City Council the designation of the entire 62 acre site as an Historic Point of Interest and specifying six development mitigations. II. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Ae Significance - Historical: Members of the Guidera and Vecchio families supplied a number of new clues which supplement an understanding of the sites. The Joseph Guidera family first pioneered in the Rochester community around the year 1914. It was in 1928 that the family relocated to the southern Etiwanda region where their home and winery remains today. In the late 1920s the family moved from their Rochester lands the dwelling now sitting at 12777 Foothill Boulevard. This small structure housed field workers on the Rochester site but served to shelter the Guidera family until they purchased the home located at 12743 Foothill Boulevard. Vito Campanel~a, owner of the now demolished Big Bear Winery, not only built his family's home but those to be inhabited by the GuideWas and the Joseph DiCarlos (12811 Foothill Boulevard). According to Joseph Guidera, son of the pioneer Joseph Guidera, the family winery ceased to make their dry red and white wines in the mid to late 1960's. HISTORIC PRESERV, )N COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 3, 1991 Page 2 III. Concerning the filling station at 12821 Foothill Boulevard, it was learned that the Meier brothers owned this and up until recently the station located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. B. Environmental Assessment - This Point of Interest designation is exempt under CEQA, Article 19, Section 15308. ANALYSIS: Our work as stewards, preservers, and interpreters of the past can be truly effective if we can translate the sense of time, place, and cm~nity that men and women of the past created. After intense and sufficient review, staff's opinion is that the context of these sites has already been altered and destroyed to the point where recommending landmark designation.. over owner objection was not merited. Staff further asserts that the community that once existed on this large site and on the north side of Foothill Boulevard is of outstanding importance and once deserving to be somehow preserved and remembered. -- IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: The DiCarlo, Schiro, Campanella, Ellena, Columbaro, and Guidera families forged a c~,,~unity based on shared.cultural background, faith, and way of existence. These women, men, and children pioneered the growing of grapes and the making and selling of wine in the eastern Cucamonga/southern Etiwanda region in the 1920s and 1930s. The homes and winery buildings stand as reminders of the thriving family-based viniculture once so prevalent in this area. The Orchard/Meier filling station is linked historically with the small retail wineries and homes it lies next to through the most popular thoroughfare of the time, Route 66. The rise of automobile travel gave way to the parallel development of roadside diners, gas stations, and repair shops. At one time, this structure filled all of these needs for travellers as well as those of the growing community of Etiwanda. Finding: The proposed Point of Interest is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. HISTORIC PRESERV. ~N COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 3, 1991 Page 3 Fact: The two houses remain as testaments to the Craftsman style as it was interpreted in the area during the 1920s. Such examples are increasingly rare. Estimated construction of the filling station dates to the late 1910s. Finding: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact: Wineries, large and modest, composed a thriving majority of the Cucamonga/Etiwanda area's businesses and land uses in the era from 1915-1950. These once extensive agricultural enterprises are rapidly disappearing from the landscape. Furthermore, roadside filling stations/restaurants are now all but obsolete. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: The proposed Point of Interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Facts: These buildings form a large part of the overall sense of place and past in the area. Finding: The proposed Point of Interest in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact: Owned by pioneer families whose descendants have stayed in the community, the home, winery, and filling station have long been an established and viable element in the area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve and forward to City Council the attached Resolution and thereby designate the Campanella, Guidera, and DiCarlo families' historic land holdings included in the proposed Foothill Marketplace as an Historic Point of Interest and specifying the following mitigations: The project owners shall sponsor a City-approved Oral History Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. 2. The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HABS/HAER Standards by an architect approved by the City. The project owners shall offer to donate the Guidera and OiCarlo homes over a period of 180 days and pay for their relocation to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel of HISTORIC PRESERV. ]N COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 3, 1991 Page 4 land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and suitable for such a relocation. J The project owners shall utilize personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site whenever possible. The developer shall incorporate the familial and agricultural past of the area into some form of commissioned public art within the project. The final specifications for this artwork shall be approved by staff. e No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of building permits for any new structures. Staff further encourages the Commission to evaluate each of these proposed mitigations in order to determine whether any of the items should be strengthened, expanded,. or weakened. Commissioner Arner, for example, suggested after the December 6, 1990 meeting that the developer could also purchase the'land to which the two Craftsman homes would be moved. Respectfully submitted, Larry J. Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AH:jfs Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated December 6, 1990 Resolution Recommending Approval DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 6, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Anthea M. Hartig, Assistant Planner LAJ~DMARK DESIGNATION 90-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an application to designate the Guidera Winery, located at 12737, 12743, 12777 Foothill Boulevard as an Historic Landmark - APN: 229-031-08. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-05 - ROUTE 66 FILLING STATION AND RESTAURANT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an application to designate 12811 Foothill Boulevard as either an Historic Landmark or an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 229-031-12. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an application to designate the site and/or house located at 12811 Foothill Boulevard as either an Historic Landmark or an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 229-031-09. BACKGROUND: The above sites came to staff's attention just prior to the submittal of CUP 90-37 -- Foothill Marketplace -- on November 14, 1990. The proposed development covers 62 acres on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Interstate 15 to Etiwanda Avenue and specifies the construction of approximately 520,000 square feet of retail space, 22,000 square feet of restaurant/food use, and a service station. Although most of the site is included in the 1987 Historic Resources Survey, this report and subsequent Historic Preservation Cmmnission action will be the first attention paid to the impact of the Marketplace on these resources. The Commission has reviewed another site on these 62 acres, namely the Big Bear Winery, in 1989 and determined that the winery and related structures were not historically significant. Of the remaining structures, the Guidera Home and Winery (also known as the Cucamonga Top Winery) located at 12737 and 12743 Foothill Boulevard was identified as a Potential Local, State, and National Register Landmark; the filling station at 12811 Foothill Boulevard was denoted as a Potential Local Landmark but the Craftsman-style home went unsurveyed. Confusion over the HISTORIC PRESER~ JN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 6, 1990 Page 2 correlation between street addresses and Assessor's Parcel Numbers led staff to deem this residence 12801 Foothill Boulevard when it seems that the old gas stationS the house share the same number, 12811. This address change is noted in the above public hearing description. The dwelling at 12777 Foothill Boulevard, although appearing to be a part of the Guidera property, does not seem to have been included in the survey forms for the family's home and winery, and thus, is recorded here as unsurveyed. Due to a lack of sufficient research and preparation time, this report is not complete and is intended to be modified and expanded during the Comission's review process. After the public hearing, further research, and the Co~ission's input, staff will make separate and specific reco~mnendations regarding each structure or set of structures. Please note that this report does not include a completed survey on the building at 12777 Foothill Boulevard. II. SITE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS: Location: All of the structures are found on and oriented towards Foothill Boulevard and lie between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue. The surveyed sites in question constitute 6.75 acres (see Exhibit HPC-2 - Site Map) of the total 62 acres of proposed cm~nercial development. Site Land Use, Zoning, and Foothill Specific Plan Designations: lhe sites in question, and the entire project site, fall into Subarea 4 and have been designated Regional Related Conmerctal. Although rural in character and with current uses of -residential and small commercial/retail (trucking, auto body) the Foothill Specific Plan singles out the area for different and more intense uses. Citing the proximity to Interstate 15 and that "the structures in the area do not currently have a strong architectural style or thematic sense" the Foothill Specific Plan mandates that "as a major entry into the Foothill Corridor...(the area) should project a strong, design image (sic)" (see Exhibit HPC-3 - Cited portion of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Iv-g.51a--IV- 9.55). Surrounding Land Uses, Zoning, and Foothill Specific Plan Designations: North - North of the sites exist the Sacred Heart Church, a number of vacant and utilized retail structures, likewise a number of residences, as well as winery-related structures. The area is zoned, however, as Regional Related Cmmnercial and Cmmnunity Conmercial. South - Under construction is a Metropolitan Water District HISTORIC PR£SERV! ~N COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90.-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 6, 1990 Page 3 processing plant to the south of the sites and its zoning is Light Industrial. East and West - The Interstate lies west of the Guidera Home and Winery and they lie west of the DiCarlo/Duffy Home that lies west of the Orchard Filling Station. The zoning is Regional Related Conmercial. O. Descriptions: Guidera Home and Winery - Description: The site contains a Craftsman-style home, altered slightly, with a detached garage and two porte-cochere of open wooden lattice; a retail shop consisting of two connected structures; and a winery complex, built in phases, extending south of the residence and including a loading dock, a free-standing, poured concrete grape crusher, a cistern, an equipment shed, and two portable, smaller field structures (reference also Exhibit HPC-4 - the DPR 523 on the site, and Exhibit HPC-5 - Photographs, Guidera Home and Winery). Orchard Filling Station - Description: A single-storied, flat-roofed structure of both slip-form 'concrete and wood framing, the filling station fronts onto Old Route 66, Foothill Boulevard. The original porte-cochere has been removed, but leaving an un-patched scar. Apparently original double wooden doors mark the garage entrance while at the other end of the facade elevation a door centered in a clipped corner acts as the opening into the restaurant/retail space. Large, single-parted lights topped by smaller, openable panels are s~m,etrically placed along the facade and entrance corner. An early, or small original, rectangular structure with a gable roof housed two restrooms. A later lean-to addition and a shed exist at the rear (south) of the original structure (see Exhibit HPC-6 - Photographs, Orchard Filling Station). The DiCarlo/Duffy Home - Description: Enclosed by an approximately 4-foot high block and decorative cement wall, this Craftsman-style home is wood framed and sided. An exterior field stone fireplace and an interior one of brick pierce the low-lying, cross-gabled roof. Square columns of wood atop battered-sided bases of concrete support a partial front porch. A concrete and wooden-framed storage structure with a low-pitched gable roof lies behind the dwelling, as does a garage/stable structure composed of block and wooden members -- most notably two sliding doors with horizontal siding. This one-storied, rectangular structure is topped by a low-pitched gable roof (see Exhibit HPC-7 - Photographs, DiCarlo/Ouffy Home). HISTORIC PRES£RVAi ~ CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 6, 1990 Page 4 IiI. ANALYSIS: Historical Background: Through its physical remnants, a way of life can be discovered; that of a tight-knit group of immigrant families who grew grapes for wine, built homes for their families and churches for their faith, and who were a distinctive element of the culture of Route 66 in the 1930s, 1940s, and lg50s. Families such as Campanella, Masi, Guidera, DiCarlo, Barrile, Ellena, Schiro -- to name a few -- created here a community. The structures along both sides of Foothill Boulevard in this area still denote the ways in which work, family, play, and the larger regional context intertwined (see Exhibit HPC-8 - Photographs and Wine Labels). B. Significance: Guidera Home and Winery: The Guidera family played an integral role in the development of the eastern Cucamonga/southern Etiwanda winery industry in the 1930s- 1950s. Thus the site represents one of the very few remaining family wineries that, like the Guidera'S Cucamonga Top Winery, served both local residents and Route 66 travellers. The family not only lived and worked in this area but also worshiped, as they along with others founded the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in the lgSOs. The significance of the home and winery is most powerful and coherent when viewed as a working unit -- the physical backdrop for a complex chain of work patterns and daily activities -- the production, marketing, sales, and way of life associated with wine making in this area. This spatial importance does not' rely on outstanding individual structures but rather on their integration as a unit. The Guidera structures have been altered to varying degrees throughout the years. The illustrative'example of a local interpretation of the Craftsman-style, the residence, has lost some of its integrity with the replacement of the center porch columns with pipe sections, but remains a significant example of the styles through the retention of exposed roof beams, field stone foundation and porch supports, wooden porch railings, trellised porches or porte-cocheres, and wooden siding of alternating wide and narrow members. The retail portion of the site was constructed in phases, seemingly to all~ for expansion, and retains a number of decorative wooden elements, including bottle silhouettes and shelves, but has lost a number of the original windows. The winery-related structures have also undergone additions but also appear to maintain much of their original integrity. D -..TO HISTORIC PRESERVA ~ COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 6, 1990 Page 5 Orchard Filling Station: As one of the two filling stations in historic Etiwanda, this structure serviced local residents, con~nercial drivers, tourists, and other travellers along the main trans-county and trans-country route of the 1930s through 1960s, U.S. 66. Initial research indicates that a descendant of the pioneering Orchard family operated the garage in the 1920s and that viniculture-related families, DiCarlo and through marriage Duffy, owned the structure until this past sumer. The building survives as one of the few reminders of a con~nercial and service-oriented business firmly rooted in a tight-knit group of families existing in a small agricultural conmunity. The DiCarlo/Duffy Home: The structure served as the residence of members of the DiCarlo family, producers of DiCarlo and Eti-Vista brand wines. Active participants in the wine-making culture of south Etiwanda, the family lived across Foothill from their winery. The domestic structure itself survives a clean and concise example of the Craftsman-style. Exposed rafters, decorative stickwork, vent grating, over-hanging eaves, a varied roof line, and the clustering of one-over-one, double-sashed windows all indicate use of the architectural vocabulary of the Craftsman-style as it was translated into the area in the lg20s. Issues: The submitted plans for the Foothill Marketplace do no-6-t--~knowledge the future existence of any of the structures discussed here.. The Foothill Specific Plan leads the path for such large-scale development by stating that, quoting at length: Subarea 4 is much less urbanized that the other three subareas. Due to the amount of vacant land and nondescript architectural legacy, there was no purpose in developing a design analysis map. However, all of the architectural, landscape architectural and streetscape elements will come directly from the other sub-areas (sic) to ensure the design continuity of Foothill Boulevard (Foothill Specific Plan, IV-9.$2). The revenue from a project as potentially large as this -- 62 acres with over hal f-a-million square feet of new conmercial/retail space -- is of course desired by the City. However, further research is needed to broaden our knowledge of this project site's past and enable a more informed decision regarding the level of historical significance of the structures and an examination of the need and/or practicality of adaptive reuse, relocation, and/or environmental mitigation measures in general. HISTORIC PRESERVA ,~ COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 90-03, 05, 06 - CIl~{ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 6, 1990 Page 6 IV. Ve D. Environmental Assessment: Any future landmark designation(s) would be exempt from CEQA under Article 19, Section 15308. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, owners within 300 feet have been notl~ staff has visited the properties, and the owners are aware of these review processes. RECC~ENDATION: Staff reconmends that the dwelling at 12777 Foothill Boulevard be surveyed and the DiCarlo home, 12811 Foothill Boulevard, be added to the Historic Resources Survey as Surveyed Undetermined Significance. Further recmmnendations include the continuation of any landmark designation decisions and level of historical significance under the California Quality Act until January 3, 1991, unless the Conmission finds sufficient evidence is presented to make appropriate findings. Respectfully submitted, Principal Planner LJH:AH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit HPC-1 Exhibit HPC-2 Exhibit NPC-3 Exhibit HPC-4 Exhibit HPC-5 Exhibit HPC-6 Exhibit HPC-7 Exhibit HPC-8 - Landmark Applications - Site Map - Cited Portion of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, IV-g.51a--IV-9.$5 - DPR 523 for the Guidera Site - Photographs, Guidera Home and Winery - Photographs, Orchard Filling Station - Photographs, DiCarlo/Ouffy Hone - Historic Photographs and Wine Labels City of Rancho m-~amonga Application fez HISTORIC LANDMAha DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION Historic Landmark Historic Point of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1, Common H'me: Guiders Home & Winery 2. Himtorlc Name, *f kno.u: Guidera Home & Winery {known as The Cucamonga Top Winery) 3. Street or Rural Address: 12737, 12743 Foothill Blvd. city: Ettwanda zip: 91739 County:San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 229-031-08 zone~Regional Related Comnercial ~e~al Deacrintion: Sub part N 1/2 N 1/2 NE 1/4 SEC 8 TP 1S R6W Lot 2 EX HGW~. 4. Present O~er, if kno~m= The Wattson Co. Address:840 Newport Cntr. Dr. #655 City: Newport Beach zip~ 92660 Ownermhlp In) publlc private ~ $. Present ume~ Dwelling/Vacant Original une~ dwelling/wine making/retail Other pant uses: wine makinq/retail DESCRIPTION Brlefly dencribs the present physical appearance of the site or structure aR~ de~ribe a~y~m~or_al~ratlona~fro~.lts orl~lnal~ condition: InS site contains a ~rattsman s:y/e nome, a rcereu slightly. with a detached garages a retail shop consisting of two connected struct, res:a winery complex, h. tlt in ~hases, extendtnq behind [south) o[ the home. and including See ~elow Locatlon sketch mp (draw & label site and surrounding.streets, roads, and prominent lan~m-rkn)~ · HIBIT HPC-1-LANDMARK APPLICATIONS I 8. Approximate property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontage Depth or approx. acreage 4.b4 9. Condition: (check one) a. L~cellent b. Good ~ c. Fair d. Deteriorated e. He lonKer ~n existence__ 10. Is the feature: a. Altered? ~ b. Unaltered? A 11. Surroundings: (check more than one ~f necessary) a. Open land X b. Renident~al X c. Scattered buildings X d. Densely built-up e. Commercial ~ f. Industrial f. Other once aqricultural *1oadinq docks, a free-~tandinq grape crusher, a cistern, an eeu~Dment.sb~d,.and .two portable, smammer t~e)o s~ruccures. 12. Threats to Site: a. None known b. Private development X d. Public Works Project~ e. Vandalism 13. Dates of enclosed photoKraph(S) November, 1990 NOTE: The followinK (Items 14-19) are for structures only. 14. c. Zonin~ f. Other Primary exterior buildins material: a. Stone c. Stucco X d. Adobe e. Wood X 15. In the Structure: n. On its original site? b. Moved? c. Unknown? 16. YeAr of Initial Construction: ]g35 This Date is: a. Factual 17. Architect (if known): Unknown 18. Builder (if known): Unknown 19. Related Features: a. Barn c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) f. Windmill h. Other Winery b. Brick f. Other poured concrete b. Entimeted X b. Carriots house X e. Formal Garden(s) Watsrtowsr/tankhouee None SIGNIFICANCE 20., Briefly state historical and/or Architectural ~mportance (include dates, events, And persons associated with the site when known): The Guiders family p]aye~ an tntegral role in the development of the eastern Cucamonga/southern [ttwanda wtnery tndustry in the 1930's and 1940's. The site represents one of the very .. few remaining family wineries that, like the Guidera's *See below 21.. Main theme of the h~stor~c resourcs) (cbsc~ only one): k. &rchltncture bo ~rts & Le~nurn c. £conomic/Industr~al X d. e. ~1orat~on/)ettl~m~nt f. 22. Sourcse: L~st books. doquments, ~ur~s~e~rson~l ~n~r~w~, a~d their date~ Interviews with.~rv. G~idera veccnlo, Hickcox, ~ltcent Arner - Nov.90; [ttwanda, The First One ** See Bel~ ~). ~mt~ fom prmp~rmd 28 NOV 90 ~ (~)~Anthea Harttg '. ~ddremm:10500 Civic Center Dr. c~t~:Rancho Cuca~n~a ~p~gl7~g phone:(714) 989-1861 City Use OnlF *Cucamonga Top Winery, served both locals and Route 66 travellers. The family not only lived and worked in this area but also worshiped, as they along with other families founded Sacred Heart Church in the 1950's. **Hundred Years; Hickcox, A History of Etiwanda; additional research performed by Melicent Arner. ~)~/ I-IPC-I-B City of Rancho ~&monga Application HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION HLstoric Landmark Historic Point of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1. COmmon Na~e: Busti]]os Home Historic Hans, if kno-n: DiCerio/Duffy Home 3. Street or Rural Address: 128]~ Foothill Blvd. city: Etiwanda zip: 91739 county: San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 229-031-09 Zone: Regional-Related Con~nercial Legll Description: 4. Present Omner, if kno~: The Wattson Co. Address: 840 Newport Center Dr. #655 city: Newport Beach zip: 92660 Ownership is: public private ~ 5. Present use: Residence Original use: Residence Other past USES: DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure a d eacr~ any major qlt~r~tiopp $Fo;n ~a qrigipal condition: ~nc~oseal~Y an approxlma=ely ~" n~gn U]OCK ana - '7. decorative plaster wall, this Craftsman-style home is wood framed and sided. An exterior field stone fireplace and an interior one of brick pierce the low lying, cross-gated roof. Location sketch snap (draw & label site and surrounding streets. roads, and prosinset landmarks): 8. Approx~te property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontage Depth or approx. acreage I.Z~ 9. Coodit~on: (check one) a. Excellent ~ b. Good c. Fair d. Deteriorated e. No longer in existence__ 10. Ia the feature: a. Altered? b. Unaltered? X ll. Surroundings: (check more than one Lf necessary) ao Open land X b. ResLdential X c. Scattered bulldin~e X d. DenseIF built-up e. Co~arcial ~ f. Industrial ~. Other HPC-I -c 19. 12. Threats to Site: a. None ~no~n b. Private development d. Public Works Project~ e. VAndalism 13, Dates of enclosed photograph(s) November 1990 NOTE: The following (Items 14-19) Are for structures only. PrimAry exterior building mAteriAl: A. Stone c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Wood X Is the Structure: s. On its original site? b. Moved? c. Unknown? Year of Initial Construction: ]92? This Date is: a. FACtUAl Architect (if known): Unknown Builder (if known): Unknown Relnted FeAtures: A. BArn c. Outhouris d. 8bed(s) ~ f. Windmill b. Other c. Zoning~ f. Other b. Br~ck f. Other Concrete X b. £stl~ted X b. CarriAge house e. Formal GArden(8) WAtertower/tAnkhouae None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural ~portsnce (Include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): ~his structure served as 'the residence of members of the DiCarlo family, producers of DiCarlo and ~tioVista brand wines. Active participants in the wine-making culture of South Etiwanda, "~he family lived across. Foothill from their winery. The domestic *(Continued on attached sheet) 21. MAin theme of the h~stor~c resource: (check only one): a. Architecture b, irtl & LeZsure c. Economic/Industrial X d. Government e. Exploratton/Settlmment f. M~lltary g. Religion 'h. Social/Education 22. Sources: List booAsi~do~u~entp,_OuF~eZs~pe~sonFl i~terv$~wn, and their dntes~ ficaJester, A ~se/Q'buloe t0 /~merlcan ~ouses; Robert Hickcox, Eatwanda: The First One Hundred Years and *(Continued on att~hR~ s~et) 23. Dnte (orm prepsred ~ NOV ~U By (rime):. Anthea Hartiq Address: 10500 Civic Center Dr.city=Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91729 Phone: (714) 989-1861 OriAnizntion: City Use Only ~ ~& HPC-I-d Historic Landmark Designation Busti)los Home {Continued) 20. Square columns of wood atop battered bases of concrete support a partial front porch. Exposed rafters, decorative stickwork and vent grating, over-hanging eaves, a varied roof line, and the clustering of one-over-one, double sashed windows all indicate use of the architectural vocabulary of the Craftsman style. A concrete and wooden framed storage structure with a low-pitched gabled roof lies behind the dwelling, as does a garage/stable structure composed of block and wooden members, most notably two sliding doors with horizontal siding. This one-storied rectangular by a low-pitched gabled roof. structure itself survives as a clean and concise example of the Craftsman style as it was translated to the area in the 1920's. A History of Etiwanda; interviews with Don Duffy, Bob Hickcox- Nov. lggO; research assistance provided by Melicent Arner. HPC-I-e C~y of R&scho ~ '~moug~ appllcstlon tor HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION Historic Landmerk Historic Point of In~erest IDENTIFICATION 1. Common N--e: Rancho Auto Body 2. Historic N&e~, if known: Orchard Filling Station 3. Street or Rural Address: 12811 Foothill Boulevard city: Etiwanda zip: 91739 Count~: San Bernardino Assessor's Parcel No. 22g-031-12 Zone: Lelnl Description, SUB~PTW N 1/2 N 1/2 NE ~ySEC 8 TP IS R CW W 108.9 FT E 573.~ F~.~ 400 FI.LOI 1EX 4. premest O.~er, if kno-~.tsee aPo/. ?or Address: 12373 Foothill) City: Zip: Ownership imt public privete $. Prement use: Auto Body Shoo originel Ume:Garaqe, fillinq station Other pent uses: Possible restaurant in NW corner of structure. DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present phymlcsl appearance of the site or structure end describe eny major alterationn fro~ ltn. o;l;~ns~ coodltlon:A sinq]e-storied flat-roofed structure or DOtS slip-- form concrete and wood-?raming, the filling station fronts onto old Route 66, Foothill Blvd. The original porte-cochere has been removed, but it's scar went us-patched. Apparently oriqinal 7.© Loresion sketch map (drew & lebel nine end ourrounding Itreetl, roads, and prominent lendmerke): 8. Approximate property size: Lot Size (in feet) Frontege Depth or epprox. acretie U.~/b 9. Condition: (check one) e. Excellent b. Good X c. Fair d. Deteriorated e. No longer in exiztence~ 10. In the feature: e. Altered? X b. Unaltered? 11. Surroundisis: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land X b. Residential X c. Scattered buildisis. X d. Deneel) built-up e. Commerciel X f. Industrial e. Other once aoricultura] D ~8 HPC-I-f 12. Threats to Site: a. None known b. PrivAte development d. Public Works Project e. VAndAliSm 13. DAtes of enclosed photograph(s) November ]990 NOTE: The followinK (Items 14-19) Are for structures only. Primary exterior building materLal: a. Stone c. Stucco X d. Adobe~ e. Wood X Is the Structure: A, On its original site? b. Moved? c, Unknown? Year of Initial Construction:' ]925 This Date ~s: s. Factual Architect (if known): Unknown Builder (~f known): Unknown Related Features: &. Barn c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) f. Windmill h. Other c. Zoning f. Other b. Brick f. OtherSlip-form soured concrete b. Estimated X b. Carriage house X e. Formal Garden(e) Wstertower/tankhouse None SIGNIFICANCE 20, Briefly state historical Bud/or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons alestinted with the site when known): AS one of the two filling stations in Etawanda, the structure serviced local residents. co,~,ercia] drivers, tourists and other travellers alonq the main trans-county route of the .. lg20's--lg50's, U.S. 66. Initial research indicates that a *{Continued - See attached sheet) 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. architecture b. Arts & ~eiaure c. Economic/Industrial X d. Government e. ExploratlonlSettloment f. Mtlltsry g. Religion h. Social/Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates: Interviews with Don Dully. Frank Vecchio. and Sob Hickc0x-a]l ~ovember ]990; much research assistance _supplied by He]ice~t. Arne~. 23. ~ate xorm prepared ~ NOV ~ By ~n~me): ~nthea Hartt~ Addroes: ]0500 Civic Center Dr.¢ity:Ranc~O Cucam0nga zip: 9]?~9 Phone~ (?]4) 989-1861 Oreanizntioo: City Use Only IV-~.511 15XHIBIT HPC-3-CITED PORTION 0 THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, ]V-9.51a - IV-9.f D -d~ o SUBAREA FOUR -- DESIGN GUIDELINES 9.8.2 Community Desicln Priority Area 9.8.1 Backclround Subarea Four is the final subarea within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Area and is physically separated from the other subareas. This physical separation, how- ever, should not be allowed to disrupt the overall design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. This "Eliwanda Gateway" subarea is the least urban of the four subareas. Struc- tures in the area do not currently have a strong architectural style or thematic sense. This Subarea serves as a major entry into the Foothill Corridor, and as such, should project a strong, design image. The Community Design Plan for the urban activity center will relate to the CC, RRC, MU/C and CVC land use designa- tions at the intersection of Eliwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Subarea four is much less urbanized than the other three subareas. Due to the amount of vacant land and non-descript architectural legacy, there was no purpose in developing a design analysis map. However, all of the architectural, landscape architectural and streetscape elements will come directly from the other sub-areaa to ensure the design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. Unlike the other activity centers along Foothill Boulevard, the activity center at Eliwanda will not require detailed pedestrian amenities. It ia recommended that landscape and roiling bares be utilized instead of hardscape materials. iV -g °32 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION bu [~AK~,A hUUK / HPC-3-b 9.1.3 Building Siting · The concept for the Eftwanda Gateway Is to create cheracter which pottreys a re- glonal commercial oriented Image. I~ulldlng setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be twenty-five feet from the curb, with h~rdscepe end landscape treatments predomirmnt In this area. Psrking Is pro- hibltad in this twenty-five foot setback aras for properties at this Intersection. 9.83 Architectural Imagery As with other subareas, no fixed archi- tectural "style" is mandated for the Eftwanda Gateway area. Buildings In this ares should reflect the community design palette established generally for Foothill Boulevard. This palette Incorporates the architoctur~l "models" provided for by the Thomas Brothers Winery end Sycamore Inn. Buildings and stnJctures shall incorporate such architectural elements is brick, wood, tile end stucco details In order to maintain a Whuman" scale wlthtn this re- gionel oriented area. Cement block, flit- up concrete, end similar "lndustrle!-type" materials are prohibited from the Ktlvlty center properties. g.l.5 LandscapelStm~tKepe Imagery The !endscape/streetscape concept for the Eftwanda/Foothill Intersection node Is same as the concept for Cucemonge Towns Center with exception of pedestrian amenities. g.l.6 Oes k~n Peletta ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DETERMINANT Contemporary Interpretations of the winery or barn prototype: o Well Materials: Textured stucco Smooth stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard, board & batten) Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone o Roofs/Pitches: Gable, hip or shed roofs (fiat roofs for three story structures only) Pitch 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Asphalt shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtone} o Accents: Exposed rafter tails Warm color accents Towers, cupolas Multi-lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awninga o Scalo: Three story heights. IV-g.53 HPC-3-c Colors Warm earthtones with bright color accents Pastels White (stucco only) Greenway through the Interior boundary near the northwest corner of the site for future connection to the Community Trail system and Miller Park. These color ranges are only examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL Crape Myrtle (primary activity center node and median species) Honeylocust Gledltsla Trlacantho$ (secondary activity center node and median species) London Plane Tree (primary suburban parkway and median species) Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime streetscape, street, parkway and median trees have been selected to avoid a' completely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted In 8 regi- mental style shall be at a minimum 30 Inch box in size. Northwest CorEr of Foothill Blvd. end east Avenue This site has been selected for 8 Community Commercial use with specific intent to allow for partial preservation of the existing Euclyptus grove. The site plan for such use shall incorporate as many existing trees as possible, but no less than GOt of the area of grove nor less than 25% of the trees. Provisions shall also be made for a 20' wide IV-9.5,~ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND CAND USE REGULATION ~U UAKI-A FUUK HPC-3-d SUBAREA FOUR I. AND USE REGULATIONS 9.9.1 Primary Functionll.ocatio~ · Subarea Four .is located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor, between the Devote 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Subarea Four acts as a major gateway into the city of Rancho Cucamonga and is char- acterized by a variety of coo,nerclal, ' residential, industrial uses, and mixed use/residential. Regional related uses will be provided adjacent to the Devote Free- way, designed to compliment the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted (X), conditionally permitted (0), or not permitted in each of the five affected land use subcategories. NOTE: Stta Development Standards Section 9.5.3.2 and 9.S.3.3 shall apply to shaded areas only. IV-g.55 HPC-3-e OEPARTMI~N'r OI= IImARK~ AND RECREATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UTM: Set. No. 1730- 36' -- HAER Loc SIlL No. ,L NR 11-452390- 3774845 C D IDENTIFICATION I. Common name: 2. Historic name: 3. Street or rurel address: 12737 Foothill Blvd. C)w Rancho Cucamonga Zig 4. Pareel number: 22g-031-08 ' 5. Present Owner: Gutdera Winery Cucamonga Top Winery, Bonded Winery 4360 91739 Sara Moyors etal, Mary G. Vecchio Rancho Cucamonga San Bernerda no ~ddrmms: zig 9173g Ownershal) is: Public 6. Present Use: Residential Original 12737 Foothill Blvd. Private X Residential and Winery DESCR I~rlON 7e. Arc~itecturel ~71e: Craftsman style ?b. Briefly describe ~e grmsent ~a~y~-JI ~o,~em,'~;~'e of ~e si~ or ,im~um end de~:Hbe any major almr~iom ~om iu original ~ondition: A single story structure of wood construction in the Craftsman style. Low front gable roof with crushed rock covering. Exposed rafters with knee braces and ex- posed beams on gable ends. Exterior stone chimney on east side. Siding is alter- nating wide and narrow boards.' Front windows are large rectangular panes extending to ceiling on ends, central pillars have been replaced with metal pipes. Porte Cocnere's located on east and west sides. Side gable with bay window. To east of structure is small winery store. 0riganal structure low gable roof with with composite shingle and exposed rafters. Clapboard siding. Appears to have been'open area, now enclosed. Double sliding barn doors with four glass lites and a single wood panel. Second addition on east or original,with high gable roof., exposed rafters with composite shingles. Stucco siding, two large dtsplay windows on either side of a centrally located standard ~od door with glass pane. At'..~ Photo EnveioM Here 8. ~on~ruetion dee: EslJmamcl 1921 Pmctu~ , g. Ar~i~ m m n b n 10. Builder Joe Camoariel 1 11. Agprox. prol~eeW size (in feet) Pronta9e. Depth or ampfox. ~em~ 4.64 12. Date(s) of em:Jmed i)hotogrmgh(s) EXHIBIT HPC-4-DPR 523 FOR THE GUIDERA SITE 13. Condition: Excellent ._.~XGood Fair Deteriorated 14. Alterations: none apparent 15. Surroundings: {Check more than one if neceuarv) O~en land X Residmltial Industrial Commercial X Other: Threat~ to site: None known__Private develoDment X Public Works project Other: 17. Is the ~ructura: On its original site? X Moved? __ 18. Related features: Winery store No longer .xis~ence .. Scattered buildings X Densely built-uo Zoning Vandalism Unknewn? SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly ~mte historical and/or erohitec~urel imDortanc~ (include dates. events, and persons associated with the site.) Joseph Guidera and Joseph Jr. were early grape growers in Eliwanda. One of the smaller wineries started in the area. One of the founding families of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Eliwanda. 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked..numbor in order of importance.) Architec~urc Arts & I. aimee Economic/Industrial X E xploretion~$ettlement Government Military Religion Sociel/Educatio. 21. and their date.). "AFteld Guide to American House" by Virginia & Lee McAlestor; San Bernardino County Assessor Records. Date Corm praeared September 9, 1987 8y (name) Lynn Merri 11 Organization Address: ~P ~o~: I ocationli tkatch mid |drlw lift libel sita and surrounding s~reat~ roods. arid prominent landmarks): NORTH HPC-4-b / ~l of Callroma. OEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANO RECREATION .~. MASTER FILE HI. JRIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODINC ,EET NOTE: Ths numbam in plma~ems indiaate either ~a number of chard'tars (lenten. numbam. punmuatien marks. spm~) that may be emered of the menbar of line~ ~t may be Ser. No. 1730 _ 36 - CiW Zip (4) Form No. (1-4) Prop. No. (O-4! USGS Qued Map No. (41 2452 zo.. (2) B C D ProperW Name: Common Name {30): Guiders Winery 10. Repass'arian S~a~us {1): __1) Ilsrod --dam (8) / / __4) m~v become eligible __2) dearmined eligible -- __5) eligible ~1 listing year (2) __6) ineligible for a~ve ~3) ag~a~ eligible __7) unde~in~ 11. ~o~ Given Regis~fion S~, (1): ~I) ~ of dis~ ~2) i~ividuil ~o~ __3) ~ of a~ 12. NR Oiss C4mgory (1): __,3) dbtHct -- No. of prol~rtias (Q-3) Hi.Eric Name (40): ~..2) sam Cucamonqa Top Winery, Bonded Winery 4360_.3)building __4} ~m~-mrm Parcel No, (0-17) 229-031-08 ~_s! obiect 4. Addre.: 12737 Foothill Blvd. Number {0-5) Names! ~rou Street Rancho Cucamonga caw/Town (3-20) 91739 .'ip code Counw 34et~r d.ignat~ (3) Vicinity of C~W/mow- ,V') SB0 5. Type of Ownership (1-71: 1) unknown X 4) prayale ~ 2) f~r~ S) ~W __3) s~m , 6)~W 6. Present Use (1~):: __I) unlmown ..~_32)) camm.mi,, msidentiM .... 4) prlvltl noh~amm. __ SI Imblic 6) none 7. Year of Initial Individuol Properw (4) Dis~r~ (8! 1921 estimated Arahit~t($)(0-25): unknown 13. Othe. r Regis=at]on (0-g) __1)Historic Am. 819. Survey __8) Cal. Historical Landmark __21 Historic Am. Eng. Rec. x~_7) County I~. of Hist. Inmm~t __3} Nsdonll Hist. Landmark.~_8) Loc~ Usdng __4} Sram Hi,eric Park __9} CountY/Regional Park ..--S) o~r 14. Proper?f Aztrtbulm: __ 1) unknow~ .-~.2) sing. f~ily --3) mull f~mily pro~. ..--.4) ~11a~ --S) h~l/mo~l 1 7) ~m. ~ 9) ~ig __10l ~ __11) ~Hng '__121 ~ __131 ~W __141 ~t __I~1 ~d~ __17) ~ln ~l ~lm~ ~1) ~ .. ~! lake/river/reservoir --.23l shio .-24l Iighmou~ --25) ~tuse~nt psrk ...2El monument/mural/gravestone __27} folk an __~) I~llt rumJarl _;.29) laddieage arc~itr. __30) trees/vegetation _.31) umm oaen am:, ..32) rural open spm:e __331 fmmirmch ._34) military property __3S) ¢CC~/PA soucrum __36) e~nic minority property e~ni¢ group (5-20) ~37) highway/trail ~.~8) ~n's properS, --J0} mmeury ....19) ~ Buildar(s) (0-25): Joe Cantoanel la ~ y# X No g. . ear of Survey (2}: 1987 'i It 0 Io I t i l--