Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/10/27 - Agenda Packet1977 CITY OF RA~ CUCA~ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 27, 1993 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUC/~MONGA, CALIFORNIA me III. IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Vallette Announcements Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meeting of September 9, 1993 October 13, 1993 Adjourned Meeting of October 13, 1993 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-13 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The design review of elevations for Building X within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70. VI. Public Hearings VII. VIII. The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish a church in a leased space of 3,168 square feet within the Burke Trademark Business Center, located within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 10261 Trademark Street, Suite B - APN: 210-441-19. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. IX. X. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-40 - LEE - A request to establish a gymnastics school in a leased space of 12,650 square feet within an existing multi-tenant industrial park (Subarea 2) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 9017 Arrow Route - APN: 209-012-19. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. THE SITE LAYOUT, CIRCULATION SURFACE TREATMENTS FOR THE METROLINK STATION AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND THE SANTA FE RAILWAY TRACKS Director's Reports D. APPROVAL OF DESIGN. AND Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Commission Business ~djournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 27, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Com~aission Brad Bullet, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-13 - WESTE~q PROPERTIES - The design review of elevations for Building X within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70. BACKGROUND: At the meeting on October 13, 1993, the Commission reviewed the revised elevations of Building X and deliberated on the issue of whether the building met the design standards of the center. The Commission agreed that the applicant had tried to address their design concerns by adding storefront glass and architectural details to the building but the effect was not successful. The majority of the Co~mission determined that the proposed scale and design of Building X did not provide compatibility to Building Y, nor did it have the same level of architectural excellence required for this center and specifically the buildings at this intersection. The Commission, with a majority vote, directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the meeting on October 27, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission review the attached Resolution of Denial. If the Corm~ission concurs with it, adoption of the resolution would be appropriate. BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated October 13, 1993 Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 13, 1993 Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 1993 Exhibit "A" - Building Elevations Resolution of Denial ITEM A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting October 13, 1993 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, John Melcher, Peter Tolstoy, Wendy Vallette ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: NEW BUSINESS Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner ao DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-13 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The design review of elevations for Building X within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Mike Lasley, Western Properties, referenced several items on the September 21, 1993, letter to the applicant. Staff reminded the applicant that the purpose of the workshop was to review the revised elevation of Building X. Tom Bond, Architects Pacifica, architect for Western Properties, described the improvements he had made to Building X. Commissioners Chitiea and Vallette stated that they concurred with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Melcher stated he did not find that the design of Building X matched the scale and excellence of the entire center. Commissioners Vallette and Chitiea remarked they had raised the same concerns at previous workshops. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed disappointment with the building design. Mike Lasley indicated a willingness to change some of the detail elements to pre-cast concrete. DRAFT DISCUSS!.ON PUP, CS'-zs Tom Bond explained that the Mission style of architecture includes the use of contrasting the simple with the very detailed elements. Chairman McNiel felt that the design for the building should be given the same attention as the entrance to a very important building or center. Commissioner Melcher stated that Building X appears to be a misfit when compared to the rest of the center because it is the only single-story building that has a gable roof, except for one theater and Montgomery Wards which are major anchors. Tom Bond explained that the building scale relates to the pedestrian height yet it is still a very tall one-story building. The Commission agreed that the applicant had tried to address the design concerns with additional storefront glass and architectural details but the outcome was not successful. Commissioners Vallette and Tolstoy believed that Building X, as proposed, could be further improved with changing the mass and scale of the building in order to meet the architectural standards of the center. Commissioners Melcher and Chitiea and Chairman McNiel felt that the scale of Building X does not provide for compatibility with Building Y and the design does not have the same level of architectural excellence as in the rest of the center. MOTION: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Chitiea, carried 3-2-0 with Tolstoy and Vallette voting no, to deny the design of Building X and direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the meeting on October 27, 1993~ as a Consent Calendar item. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary PC Adjourned Minutes October 13, 1993 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 13, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-13 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The design review of elevations for Building X within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70. BACKG~DUND: On August 25, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed the revised elevations for Buildings X and Y. The Co~%~ission found Building Y acceptable but felt Building X needed refinement. The Commission then approved Building Y with the condition that Building X be subject to further review. Attached for the Commission's reference are copies of the approval letter with the conditions of approval for Development Review 93-13 and the draft minutes of the meeting for August 25, 1993. The applicant has refined the elevations of Building X by adding plaster trim with scored lines to resemble pre-cast concrete trim around the arches at the north and south sides of the building. Two smaller pre-cast concrete medallions were added to the north elevation. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff reviewed the revised elevations and determined that the applicant has improved them per the Com~ission's direction. However, staff feels that ti~e elevations can be further enhanced by the following treatment: The proposed plaster trim with scored lines around the arches at the north and south elevations should be changed to pre-cast concrete material. Pre-cast concrete trim should be added to the east and west sides of the south gable entry. 3. Pre-cast concrete trim should be added to the arch at the east elevation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ends that the Commission review the revised elevation. If the Co~ission finds it to be acceptable and concurs with staff's recommendation, then approval of Building X through minute action would be appropriate. Res~ully~.~bmitted, BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 1993 Approval Letter dated September 21, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting August 25, 1993 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Larry McNiel, John Melcher, Peter Tolstoy, Wendy Vallette ABSENT: Suzanne Chitlea STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner NEW BUSINESS ao DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-13 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The design review of elevations for Buildings X and & within the Terra vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-70. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Tom Bond, Architects Pacifica, architect for Western Properties, described to the Commission the changes he had made to buildings X and Y. Commissioner Vallette stated that both buildings need to have additional architectural embellishments such as stone treatment around arches, windows, etc.,, similar to the approved elevations. Commlssioner Tolstoy remarked that the west elevation of building X still looked like the back side of a building. Commissioner Melcher felt that this west elevation was acceptable. Chairman McNiel agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy's comment on the west elevation. Commissioner Melcher questioned whether the proposed location of the trash enclosure area is appropriate so close to Foothill Boulevard. Mike Lasley, Western Properties, stated the locations is shown on the original approved plans. Co~issioner Tolstoy asked if the parking next to the trash enclosure will be for loading and unloading. Mike Lasley indicated that they can stripe the parking spaces next to the trash enclosure area as a loading space. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested the Commission make a decision on Buildings X and Y. He suggested the Commission could come to a consensus to approve Building Y and to bring Building X back for another workshop. He pointed out that the Commission should provide direction to staff and the applicant regarding whether the proposed sign location for Leaps and Bounds at the south elevation of building Y is acceptable. He observed the approved sign program allows the sign to be located at the facia instead of the parapet wall. The consensus of the Commission was that the elevation for Building Y is acceptable. The majority of the Commission felt that the elevation for Building X needs improvement. Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Vallette, carried 4-0-1 with chitiea absent, to approve the revised elevations of Building Y; to direct the applicant to revise and resubmit Building X for Commission review at a future workshop; to find the sign location on the parapet wall of the south elevation of Building Y acceptable, so long as there is only one tenant, however, sign placement to revert to the facia (lower sign band area) consistent with the approved sign program when two or more tenants occupy the building; and to prov:~de that all secondary issues identified in the August 11, 1993, staff report be approved by the City Planner. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet Secretary PC Adjourned Meeting Minutes -2- August 25, 1993 X RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-13, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING X, A 5,350 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-70. A. Recitals. 1. Western Properties has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 93-13 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 11, August 25, October 13, and October 27, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meetings on August 12, August 25, October 13, and October 27, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property identified as Pads X and Y, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue and is presently improved with landscape and hardscape; and b. The properties to the north and east of the subject site are developed with a shopping center, the property to the south is developed with an office park, and the property to the west is developed with a mixed-use business park; and c. Buildings X and Y are part of the Terra Vista Town Center and were approved as two-story office buildings; and d. The applicant requested to change the approved elevations for Buildings X and Y from a two-story to a single-story building design, and from office to retail use; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-13 DENIAL - WESTERN PROPERTIES October 27, 1993 Page 2 e. The Commission stated that the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue is very important and that the architecture should be of significance; and f. The Commission initially reviewed the new elevations at the meeting on August 11, 1993, and the applicant agreed with the Commission that additional exhibits were necessary to better depict and address the concerns raised by the Commission. The commission did not find the two buildings, as presented, consistent with the standard set with the original project approval for these two building pads. At that time, the Commission directed the applicant to revise the two single story buildings with a design that matches the same level of sophistication as the approved elevations; and g. At the meeting on August 25, 1993, the Commission found the revised elevations of Building Y to be acceptable but determined that Building X was not. The Commission approved Building Y with the condition that Building X be subject to further Commission review; and h. At the meeting on October 13, 1993, the Commission deliberated on the issue of whether Building X meets the design standards of the center. The Commission agreed that the applicant had tried to address design concerns by adding storefront glass and architectural details to the building but the effect was not successful. The majority of the Commission determined that the proposed scale of Building X does not provide compatibility to Building Y and the design does not have the level of architectural excellence required for a building at this intersection. The Commission, with a majority vote, directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for their adoption at the meeting on October 27, 1993. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed project is in accord with the objective of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the architecture of Building X is not consistent with the architectural standards established in the Terra Vista Town Center through Conditional Use Permit 88-12. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application without prejudice. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 93-13 DENIAL - WESTERN PROPERTIES October 27, 1993 Page 3 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 27th day of October 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Weloh Mmn-gement Corpormtlon · UPLAND · LA VERNE · · RANCHO CUCAMONGA · · ONTARIO · PHILLIPS RANCH · · ALTA LOMA · Oct. 8, 1993 RECEIVED OCT 1 8 1993 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Re: Notification of hearing and environmental notice Subject: Conditional use permit 93 - 42 Church of Christ of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division We strongly oppose the iss;,auce of a l~mit for a church use wiflfin the Burke - Trademark Business Center. We "purclumed" our offices, 10261 space D, with the intention of being located in a BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT. We invested over $265,000 to have the right to that type of autosphere. The Industrial use should not be abandoned. Parking: I00 - 200 cars (or any more than allowed by previous allotmen0 would severely tax the park like atmosphere. Assessment: Condo projects rely upon tenants to contribute monthly to a Common Area Msintenancc (CAM) fund which is based upon the size (sq. footage) of the owned or leased space. Currently, we have 4 - 6 people in our 3168 sq. ft. space using the "Common area." If you allow this use, they will be paying the same CAM as we do, yet cause our CAM to increase significantly, due to the increase in wear and tear on the asphalt, water usage, and replacement of plants, shrubs, etc. Potential Damage: The congregation of people, families would cause severe damage tO plants, bushes, trees, ~ound cover and lawns planted for low density of people: Large assemblies of people would surely cause a heavy toll on the types and designed use of the landscaping. 10261 TRADEMARK, SUITE D, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 OFFICE 714/980-9961 FAX 714/987-2382 Most church congregations use their facilities numerous times a week, not just one day. Th~,~£o~, we foresee potential safety concerns with children playing or running around. Frequently large mseks are delivering to the various co,~.~anies f~m 7am to 6 or 7pm and many of us work later and have our business meetings until 8 - 10pm. Because many of the businesses now here and those who will purchase in the future are small, we frequently work on the weekends. Thank you for the opportunity to respond. //~/Sincerely, Terry Welch Welch Management Corp. 10261 Trademark, Ste. D ~Tharesa Welch Welch Management Corp. 10261 Trademark, Ste. D CTW:dw DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish a church in a leased space of 3,168 square feet within the Burke Trademark Business Center, located within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 10261 Trademark Street, Suite B - APN: 210-441-19. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The 9.6-acre site is fully developed with a multiple tenant industrial park with 11 buildings totaling 146,751 square feet. B. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Church 3,168 1/35 57 57 (2,000 (Sanctuary Sanctuary) Area) Medical Office 1,584 1/200 8 8 Office (Occupied) 11,167 1/250 45 45 Warehouse (Occupied) 23,053 1/1000 22 22 (up to 20,000) 1/2000 20-40,000) Vacant 107,779 1/400 269 (Multi-tentant) 275 Total 146,751 401 407 ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 2 ANALYSIS: ae General: The applicant is proposing to operate a church within the Burke Trademark Business Center. Church services will be conducted from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Sundays and 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Wednesdays. No office hours are proposed at this time. For further details about the use, please refer to Exhibit "A." B. Issues: In analyzing the proposed Conditional Use Permit, two specific issues should be considered as follows: Land Use Compatibility: The use is proposed within the Burke Trademark Business Center, where a variety of uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted as per the Industrial Park Land Use designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Currently, the space to the east contains a medical clinic while the space to the west is vacant. All existing tenants in the park operate primarily during peak weekday business hours. Given the proposed off-peak hours for church services, staff does not anticipate any compatibility problems. Numerous churches have been operating successfully in the industrial area for years with no reports of land use compatibility problems. Parking: With the proposed church, the site will have a surplus of 6 parking spaces. This fact, combined with the off-peak hour use of the church, should allow for a significant surplus of on-site parking at all times. Therefore, staff does not anticipate any parking concerns will arise from locating this church within the Burke Trademark Business Center. Fire District: The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District reviewed the conceptual plans and at this time feels the upgrades required for this use will include a conspicuously displayed commercial type fire extinguisher, emergency lights near all exits, panic hardware, fire sprinklers (if not already provided), and a manual fire alarm. Based on the size of the facility, the maximum occupancy will be required to be posted to the satisfaction of the Fire District. Building and Safety Division: The Building and Safety Division reviewed the conceptual floor plan and indicated a change of occupancy plan check is necessary, including submittal of detailed plans, prepared by a licensed architect or engineer, for review and approval prior to occupancy. The plans will help determine the maximum occupancy for the use at any one time. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part 'II, the Environmental Checklist, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Com~aission concurs with staff's findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration and approve Conditional Use Permit 93-42 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Floor Plans Resolution of Approval with Conditions Church of Christ of Rancho Cucamonga Hugh Shira 714/987-4500 714,/948-0315 !4~J~BEF' OF r!Er-!BEF:E: ]5 FE~S.,')rl FiR PE~'~I1EST: CHIIRrCH MAS BEEN MEETING AT = = W. IN LIF'LAND AT A BUILDING OWNED E:~ THE C~A~FE? Ci]MMIJNITf CULTURE CENTEF'. MOST OF THE ~'E]F~E AND WOg:F: IS IN RANCHO CI.JCAMONGA. THE CHU6r]~ CAf~ BEST SERVE THE PEOFLE ,:UCmMONGA B~ BEIr4G ~OCm,EL ~HE ,iIT~ LIPliT: ~Ar'~C~O C JC~ONGA. £ )(t41~ /7' Center Avenue RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-42 A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A CHURCH IN A LEASED SPACE OF 3,168 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE BURKE TRADEMARK BUSINESS CENTER, LOCATED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AT 10261 TRADEMARK STREET, SUITE B, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-441-19. A. Recitals. 1. Church of Christ of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-42, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of October 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 27, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 10261 Trademark Street, Suite B within the Burke Trademark Business Center, which has a Trademark Street frontage of 307.97 feet and lot depth of 754.35 feet and is improved with a multiple tenant industrial park with 407 parking spaces; and b. The property to the north and south of the subject site is vacant, the property to the east is a multiple tenant industrial park and vacant, and the property to the west is a concrete flood control channel and vacant; and c. The applicant proposes to conduct church services from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Sundays and 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Wednesdays; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 2 d. The application is located adjacent to an existing medical clinic, which operates primarily during regular weekday business hours. All other contiguous space is currently vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Plannin~ Division 1) Approval is granted for church use 0nly. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other City ordinances. 3) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including but not limited to parking or noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building and Fire Code regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 3 5) 6) 7) 9) The maximum occupancy of the facility shall be limited as specified by the occupancy requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and posted as such to the satisfaction of the Fire District prior to occupancy. Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the comprehensive Sign Ordinance and/or any applicable Uniform Sign program for the Burke Trademark Business Center and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. Church services shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building, except for off-site special events approved through a separate Temporary Use Permit. Hours of operation for services or other large assemblies shall be limited to weekends and after 5:30 p.m. on weekdays, excluding national holidays. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 4 10) No exterior modifications to the building are approved by this permit. 5. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF October 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-42 - CHURCH OF CHRIST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Page 5 I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 27, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-40 - LEE - A request to establish a gymnastics school in a leased space of 12,650 square feet within an existing multi-tenant industrial park (Subarea 2) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 9017 Arrow Route - APN: 209-012-19. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The project site is within the existing Arrow Business Park which contains seven buildings consisting of 157,336 square feet on 8.7 acres. Parking Calculations: See attached Exhibit "G." ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to locate within a ~2,650 square foot leased space within an existing multi-tenant industrial park. The proposal comprises all of Building 4 in the southwestern portion of the project site. Specific class sizes and times are proposed by the applicant and are discussed in the following section of the report. The applicant is proposing to offer gymnastics, karate, tiny tots, and mommy and me programs. No noise issues are anticipated since the project will not share any common walls with adjacent businesses. The majority of the interior space is devoted to various gymnastics equipment including uneven bars, parallel bars, and balance beams, etc., with a large portion taken up with a floor exercise area. A karate and dance area occupies a portion of the building with the remainder being utilized by locker rooms, observation/snack bars, an instructors' room, and a gym shop. Issues: The primary issues involved with this type of use in an industrial district are parking, compatibility with surrounding uses, noise, and vibration. The following addresses these issues: Availability of Parking: This issue concerns the availability of parking, loading, and unloading areas and the potential for an additional impact of increased traffic within the site. There are 371 total spaces within the project site, with 25 spaces allocated to ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-40 - LEE October 27, 1993 Page 2 this unleased space based on the manufacturing ratio of 1 space per 500 square feet). The proposed gymnastics school facility is considered a "commercial school" for the purposes of calculating parking. This is because of the fact that specific structured class times have been proposed rather than an "open" timeframe as would be the case with a "health studio or spa." Based on this interpretation, a total of 22 spaces would be required for the project, anticipating a maximum of 50 students and 5 faculty members at any one time. The highest concentration of students would occur in the evenings from 8-9 p.m. when the parking demand for the remainder of the center would be very low (see Exhibit "A-5). Additionally, class sizes during the weekday morning time slots would be limited to 12 for "Mommy and Me" programs and 8 for "Tiny Tots" programs (10 a.m. - 1 p.m., Monday through Friday). Maximum occupancy has been noted as a condition of approval. It is anticipated by the applicant that the after school tumbling program on weekdays at 2 p.m. has the potential for 25 students. With class size limited to this number, the parking provided will be sufficient. Saturday morning is also anticipated to be a heavy use time for the gymnastics facility which would not pose a conflict with other businesses in the site. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses: There are a variety of uses operating within the business park as can be seen in Exhibit "D." An existing karate school is located within the center and occupies 1,920 square feet. No problems or complaints have been reported on this business through either the Business License or the Code Enforcement Divisions. In looking at the mix of uses within the site, staff believes that the gymnastics studio would not create any adverse impacts that would be incompatible with the surrounding users. Noise and Vibration Conflicts: Potential noise and vibration conflicts could arise from the use of sound systems for the various activities within the school. The fact that the tenant will be the sole occupant of a freestanding building will mitigate any noise or vibration concerns that might otherwise be present. In addition, as is the case with all Conditional Use Permits, if the use causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses, the Planning Commission could review the CUP for possible modification or revocation. Technical Issues: The Fire District has indicated that the proposed use may be considered a public assembly depending upon the occupant load. The applicant must contact the Building and Safety Division for a change in occupancy determination (see Exhibit "F"). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-40 - LEE October 27, 1993 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Upon review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part II, the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a gymnastics school locating within this multi- tenant industrial center. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 2) in which the site is located; Bo That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to the adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 93-40 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB: BN/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - List of Tenants Exhibit "E" - Suite Square Footages Exhibit "F" - Fire District Comments Exhibit "G" - Parking Table Resolution of Approval Inland Valley Gymnastics and Academy Derailed Description of the Proposed Project Application For A Conditional Use Permit (Non Construction) August 26, 1993 Submitted to: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Submitted by: Paul and Claire Lee 3547 North Mills Claremont, Calif. 91711 (909) 625-7552 Inland Valley Gymnastics Academy: Mission Statement It is the goal of the Inland Valley Gymnastics Academy to have the finest training equipment and facilities available. The Arrow Business Park, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, California, is believed to be ideally situated to allow the area to develop a first class, first rate training and educational facility. The Inland Valley Gymnastics Academy is dedicated to providing gymnastics training classes and activities that will: o Encourage and Maintain Physical Fitness o Improve Coordination o Develop Courage and a Winning Attitude In Youth o Improve Mental Processes and Encourage Discipline Basic physical qualities such as strength, balance, agility, flexibility and muscular endurance are important to good health. Inland Valley Gymnastics promotes these qualities that are vitally important in the successful performance of all sports. Basic good health, good posture, and positive attitudes are necessary for efficient, happy everyday living. Gymnastics improves movements involving the entire body. The sport provides a continual challenge and increased coordination through progressively difficult stunts. It is this challenge that leads to the development of self confidence and poise. These traits are carried on to all aspects of daily living and provide motivation and aid in successful, meaningful accomplishments. Inland Valley Gyinnastics Staff An outstanding group of instructors has been selected to ensure the finest gymnastic coaching available. Only fully trained, safety certified instructors are used in the Academy. Instructors are selected based upon experience and are fully equipped to coach all levels of gymnastics. Basic gymnastic fundamentals will be taught during each session and lead to the development of advanced techniques. Training guidelines include the following: 1. Gymnasts are assigned to groups according to age and ability. 2. Training on the various equipment apparatus is through group rotation. 3. Individual progress and advancement is monitored periodically. The student/coaching ratio is kept low to allow for maximum individual attention. Classes will be conducted Monday through Saturday and will vary in length and frequency. Enrollment in the Academy is on a monthly basis. The Academy has the finest equipment available including: balance beams; parallel bars; uneven parallel bars; vaulting run; high bar; ring tower; pommel horse; mini tramps; and large exercise and a tumbling floor. Also for the convenience of parents and spectators, an observation area will be provided. Classes and Schedules: In addition to providing a high quality sports and youth development program, the Academy management feel that working as a active participant in the community is key to long term success. As such, the Academy plans to work closely with City and School representatives to develop a service plan to make the facilities as accessible to as many individuals as possible. Though subject to change based upon community needs, initial class schedules include the following: Mornmy and Me Programs: Monday through Friday 10:00 a.m.- Noon Each class will be approximately 45 minutes long and will be geared to approximately 12 students. The class will be structured for fun, development and exercise for both parents and young children Tiny Tots: Monday Through Saturday Daily Each class will be approximately one hour long and will be geared to physical development and fun with young children. Class sizes will be limited to eight. Tumbling and After School: Monday through Friday 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. These classes will be geared towards Junior High and High School Cheerleaders and general conditioning. Academy Gymnastics Program: Monday through Friday 3:00 p.m.- 7:00 p.m. Each class is one hour and fifteen minutes long. Class sizes will be approximately 10 participants and will be structured to stress the fundamentals of gymnastics. Team Gymnastics Program: Monday through Friday 5:00p.m.- 9:30 p.m. Team gymnastics stress competition and progressively move students into more challenging training. Team members travel to other gymnastic competitions where performance standards are closely monitored. Open Gym Workout: Saturday Open workout periods allow participant in the gymnastics programs to practice events or just come and have fun with friends. Though monitored by trained staff, the open workouts are generally unstructured. Parking Requirements: The operating philosophy of the Inland Valley Gynmastics Academy is to stress quality and safety. As such, although parents are always welcome to attend and watch workouts from the convenience of a viewing room, they are not permitted into the training area while classes are taking place. Our experience has taught us that this separation is not only essential to maintaining a quality work environment, but it usually results in between 80% and 90 % of parents simply dropping off their children and then returning to pick them up at a later time. The current facility used to house existing gymnastic teams that will become the basis for this business venture shares about twenty parking spaces with five other businesses and has proven to be a workable arrangement.. The direct parking spaces available at the Arrow Business Park (Thirty-Nine solely dedicated to the gymnastic facility) will provide more than ample space requirements to meet the needs of the business. The attached chart compares available space to the anticipated maximum needs for the facility. This chart demonstrates that even at a maximum operating level, the site's 39 parking spaces will never fully be needed. In addition to these 39 direct access spaces, there is well in excess of 50+ additional spaces within the business park to provide for more than enough of a safety margin for use. The heaviest use of the gymnastics facility will be between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and on Saturday morning. This schedule should work especially well with the surrounding tenants who typically operate on a standard work schedule. A Final Word: We hope this information is sufficient to answer your questions regarding the Conditional Use Permit (Non-Construction) being requested. Should there be additional questions or if additional information is necessary, please feel free to give us a call. Thank-you for your consideration and we are looking forward to a long and mutually beneficial relationship with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for many years to come. l Project: Title: Exhibit: Date: ......... ?BMJrT KAM .... ~ .... KX~T#It.L ~1170N UPtlO~TBRY PHD & ASSOC. NellY'S ~LLe ~-~tST~GE SYST~S ~MST ]~ITRIES TEL-NET CITY OF R '~AMONGA PLANNI~ON Project: Title: Exhibit: FII~,F..$,\!~l' l"~i [)[VISIt)N l'[t()Jl:~,"l' Rt:V!!:\'(' TO:. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner Susan De Antonio, Fire Inspector October 5, 1993 INL,~q'D VAI .I .F.y GYMNASTICS ACADF_M~f 9017 Arrow PROJECT REVIEW ISSUES: No dimensions on plan. I rounded down the available floor area to I0,000 square feet for actual exercise. Code requires 50 square feet per person, resulting in a maximum capacity of 200 persons in the main exercise area. Occupant load exceeding 49 persons changes the occupancy group to a public assembly - A-3. Building was designed and approved as B-2, general office/business park. What is classification of business sharing common walls, if any? Applicant will have to contact Building and Safety for a change in occupancy determination. Applicant will have to apply for a permit to conduct a place of public assembly from the Fire Department (fee required). Construction will be required to upgrade existing office corridor to 1-hour fire rated construction. All doors opening into this fire rated co,,idor are required to be a minimum 20 minute fire rated with self-closers, smoke gaskets and 20 minute fire rated door frames, hardware, etc. Any HVAC ducts servicing this fire rated corridor shall be 6ombination fire/smoke dampers, as per Uniform Building Code Standards 43-7 and 43-12. Specs must be submitted for approval prior to installation. October 5, 1993 Page Two 7. Reverse the swing of the hallway door by the instructor's room. 8. Panic hardware required on this door if any lock or latch is installed. 9. Exit sign required over this door on gym side. 10. Exit sign required over exterior door by vault runway. 1 1. Panic hardware required on this door. 12. Due to use of vault runway it is possible this door may be considered blocked by athletic activities. Discuss this with Fire Department plans checker. 13. Emergency lighting required throughout occupancy. 14. Exit sign required over main lobby doors. 15. Panic hardware required on these doors. 16. Three fire extinguishers required. Minimum' size 2AIOBC. EXHIBIT "G# PARKING CALCULATIONS ~OR C[9 93-40 Building 1 #200-280 #100-180 2 #100-190 3 #200-280 #100-190 5 #100-180 6 #100-180 7 #110-120 TOTAL Type Square Parking of Use Footage Ratio Number of Spaces Required Office 10,036 1/250 40 Multi-tenant 17,680 1/400 44 Multi-tenant 19,632 1/400 49 Office 11,388 1/250 46 Multi-tenant 19,500 1/400 49 12,650 50 students 5 employees 1/3 students 1/faculty Co~-ercial School 17 5 Multi-tenant 15,300 1/400 38 Multi-tenant 16,320 1/400 41 Manufacturing 17,415 1/500 35 364 Number of Spaces Provided 371 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-40 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GYMNASTICS SCHOOL IN A LEASED SPACE OF 12,650 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL PARK, LOCATED IN SUBAREA 2 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AT 9017 ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-012-19. A. Recitals. 1. Paul and Claire Lee have filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-40 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of October 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 27, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 9017 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 780 feet and lot depth of 460 feet and is presently improved with a multi-tenant industrial park; b. The property to the north of the subject site is multi-family residential and a park site, the property to the south consists of a manufacturing/general industrial building, the property to the east is a large industrial building, and the property to the west is a large industrial building and vacant land; c. The subject property consists of a variety of office and light industrial/multi-tenant uses; d. Adequate parking exists on the site for the proposed use; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-40 - LEE October 27, 1993 Page 2 e. Adjacent businesses will not be affected by any potential noise generated from the facility because this is a single occupant building. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-40 - LEE October 27, 1993 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Plannin~ Division 1) The total number of students on-site at any one time shall be limited to 50. 2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including but not limited to, parking, noise, and/or vibration, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Development Code, and all other applicable City ordinances. 4) Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal's regulations have been complied 'with. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program for the Arrow Business Park and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-40 - LEE October 27, 1993 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 1993, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 1993 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, Community Development Director William J. O'Neil, City Engineer APPROVAL OF THE SITE LAYOUT, CIRCULATION STAFF REPORT DESIGN, AND SURFACE TREATMENTS FOR THE METROLINK STATION AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND THE SANTE FE RAILWAY TRACKS BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received $3.5 million from SANBAG for the installation of a Metrolink Station in Rancho Cucamonga. The funding, albeit limited, is administered by the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), who have been in close contact with the City during the site selection process. After lengthy deliberation the site of Milliken Avenue was chosen by the City Council. Staff is currency in negotiation with the owner of the site, General Dynamics, for acquisition of an ultimate 10 acre site. The team of L.D. King, Inc. and Parsons-DeLeuw has been chosen as engineers, and the team of RJM Design Group and Wol f-Lang-Christopher as Landscape and Structure Architects - Designers. These teams have been meeting with a committee of representatives from staff, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), SANBAG, and General Dynamics. Numerous topics have been discussed, including, platform locations, ingress/egress, permanent and temporary parking needs, bus, car, and pedestrian circulation activities and site constraints. One of the many key items discussed was the need for separation of the varied modes of transportation to the station. Staff has found some existing Metrolink stations mix pedestrians, cars, taxis, Omni vans and busses in the same focus area. This was seen as unacceptable for safety reasons. Therefore, the proposed layout has made a concerted effort to separate these activities and still provide a central element to the site. Another key element was the requirement of SCRRA to provide two platforms. This has been found to be essential to operate trains both to and from the Los Angeles area. SCRRA staff members indicated some stations currency in use are being "skipped" by some trains due to insufficient platform areas. Surface treatments such as sandblasting, rock salt, and coloring of concrete have been integrated throughout the site including the platform. Hardscape options will be presented. No stamped concrete or "Bomanite" texture is used or proposed. Some interlocking pavers have been suggested in the parking lot areas along with striping delineation. The subject proposal is the result of these discussions to-date and is submitted to the Commission for review, comment and approval. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT METROLINK STATION October 27, 1993 Page 2 The Central Theme element and protective structures will be submitted for Commission approval at a later date. Final design is scheduled to be completed by February 1, 1994, with advertisement of bids to follow immediately thereafter. This will keep us on target to open the Metrolink Station on September 1, 1994. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed layout, including plaza and platform configuration, and circulation elements for the Metrolink Station to allow final design of these elements to commence. Respectfu~y~ submitted, 7~ Community Development Director RG:WJO:dl w Attachments Lr nG Engineers ,'Planners ED. King, Inc. 2143 East D Strew! Suite 110 Ontario. CA 91764~t464 {714) 988-,5492 FAX (714) 988,-5463 LL co /,