HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-169 - Resolutions RESOLUrION NO. 92-169
A RESOLUTION OF ~HE CITY (IX~C[L OF ~HE CITY OF RANCHO
~, CAT.~, lv]I21D~ AND ~ THE
(I~DITIONS OF APPROVAL F~R T~FI~TIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO
(~EATE A 1.31 ~/~E PARCEL IN q~E TERRA VISTA ~
~EOF - APN: 227-151-17
(i) Lewis Develc~ ~ny b~-~ filed an application for approval
of Tentative Parcel Map 13987 as de~nribed in the title of this Resolution.
to as "the application."
(ii) On December 17, 1991, the Planning C~mu.d~sion conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to reoeive written and oral testimony on the proposed
Application. Said public hearing was continued to January 8, 1992.
(iii) On January 8, 1992, the Planning C~m~/ssion received
additional public testimony on said Application and continued said Application
for an indefinite time period.
(iv) On April 8, 1992, the Planning ~ion of the City of Rancho
O~m~3a conducted a duly noticed public hearin~ on the Application and,
following the ~lusion of said public hearing, ~ Resolution No. 92-62
there~ oonditiom~] ly ~ing said Application.
(v) ~he decision re~ by said Planning (l~mdssion Resolution
was t~ly appealed to this c~=~il.
B. Resolution.
NC~, ~REFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as folly:
1. ~ Oouncil hereby specifically fir~s that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. ~ Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
Quality Act of 1970, and concurs with the issuance of the Negative Declaration
issued on April 8, 1992.
the abov~-ref~ May 20, 1992 hearing, ~cludir~ wri~ staff reports,
the minutes of the above-ref~ Planning C~m~aission ~ting, and the
contents of Planning (lamaission Resolution No. 92-62, this ~il hereby
specifically finds as follows:
Resolutic~ No. 92-169
p~2
(a) ~he applicatic~ applies to property located at the south-
west corner of Base T,~ne Road ar~ Ruchester Avenue with a street frc~ of
250 feet along Base L/ne Road and 174 feet along t~m~%ester Averse. The parcel
(b) ~ px~pexty to the north and east are zoned for and being
developed with si. gle-family reside~es. ~ p~rty to ~e sash and west
are zoned for multi-family units and are vacant; and
(¢) The Application creates a single parcel of 1.31 acres; and
(d) ~he rec/uir~s of Plannin~ C~.,,~-~ion Resolution Number
92--62, ~ to be important and necessary to the develc~ent of the
property, excegt for the following modifications:
(1) Engineering COndition Number 2 shall be rev/seal to
re~e the construction of Rod%ester Avenue full width from Base T,{~e Road to
T~-~-~ood Avenue with a transition as c~X~rmi~ed by the City ~ineer; and
(2) t~gineering Condition Number 5 shall be deleted; and
(3) A condition shall be added as Eng~in~ Oonditio~
Number 9 that the developer enter into an a~ and po~t securities to
with the Terra Vista Implementation Policies within 2 years of oocupancy of
the proposed develo~ or prior to the construction of the traffic signal at
the intersection of I%0chester Avenue and Churc~ Street, whichever occurs
first.
(e) The develo~nt as s~ecified will not contradict the go~s
or objectives of the General Plan or the Terra vista ~ty Plan am~ wou]d
immediate vicinity of the subject site.
during the above-ref~ public hearing, including written and o~=1 staff
reports, this Council hereby finds ar~ concludes as follows:
(a) The application is cc~istent with the General Plan and
Terra Vista C~unity Plan of the City of Rancho ~; and
(b) ~he design or i.~uv=ments of The Application is o0~sistent
with the General Plan and the Terra Vista (k~,.,-~%ity Plan of the City of Rand%o
(c) The px~posed project is not likely to cause substantial
e~aH_~xm~fcal damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their
habitat; and
(d) The proposed project is not likely to cause serious health
(e) The propoeed project is not likely to cause serious health
problems.
Resolution No. 92-169
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in par-~3ra~hs
1, 2, 3 ~ 4 above, this Oouncil hereby apuroves the Tentative Parcel Map
subject to all of the CU~z~itic~ set fc~ch in Planning (k~,td~sic~ Resolution
No. 92-62 (a copy of which is attached hereto ar~ mark~d_ as Emhibit "A") with
the specific e~ic~s as follows:
(a) ~ineering C~ti~ ~ 2 to ~re~_~__:
A~,~e necessary right of way and construct Rocb~
Avenue full width frc~ Base L{ne Road to Ironwood Street
includ/ng a transitic~ of the public i~ as
(b) Engin~ring C=Uition Numar 5 ~all be delete; and
(c) A oo~d~tic~ shall be added as Number 9 and shall r~__d as
follow~:
An agreement with apuro~riate securities shall be executed
to the satisfactic~ of the City Engineer and City Attorney,
constructi~ of street anU storm drain improvements in
accordance with the Terra vista O~m,~nity Impl~_ntation
Policies within 2 years of occupancy of the proposed
develo~ ~r prior to the construction of the traffic
signals at the intexsection of Rochester Avenue and Church
6. ~ Council hereby provides notice to Lewis Development COmpany
that the t/me within which judicial review of the decision re~ by this
Resolutic~ ~ be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of
civil Procedure Sectic~ 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby
d i~T~d to:
(a) certify to the adoption of th/s Resolution; and
(b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of th/s Resolution, by
8. ~he City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 1992.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright
Resol~ion No. 92-169
P~ge4
De~-a J. ~, city Clerk
California, do hereby that the foregoing Besolutio~ was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City O~uncil of the City of Rancho C~,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Oouncil held on the 3rd day of
June, 1992.
Executed this 4th day of June, 1992, at Rancho Cucamong~, California.
Resolution No. 92-169
Page 5
P~ESOLUT ION NO. 92-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13987, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTh"WEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-17
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13987, submitted by Lewis
Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 1 parcel,
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 227-151-17, located at
the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, and continued to December 17, 1991, January
8, 1992, and April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission held duly advertised
public hearings for the a~ove-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS=
SECTION %: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3.That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or public
health problems or have adverse effects on abutting
proper=les.
SECTION ~ This Comission finds and cs~ifies ~hat the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Comission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
~~__~ Tentative Parcel Map Number 13987 is hereby approved
subject to the a~tached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions~
1. Overhead Utilities
a. Base Line Road - An in-lieu fee as a
contribution to the previously undergrounded
utilities (electrical and telecommunication) on
the opposite side of Bale Line shall be paid to
EXHIBIT "A"
Resolution No. 92-169
Page6
· the city prior to issuance of building permits
or final map approval, whichever occurs first.
The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit
amount times the length from the center of
Rochester Avenue to the west project boundary.
b. Rochester Avenue - An in-lieu fee as
contribution to the future undergrounding of
existing overhead utilities (electrical and
telecommunication, except for 66 K.V.
electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester
Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to
issuance of a building permit or final map
approval, whichever occurs first. The fee shall
be one-half the City adopted unit amount times
the length from the center of Base Line Road to
the south project boundary.
2. Acquire necessary right-of-way and construct
Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to
Church Street. Offsite sidewalk and street trees
may be deferred until the development of the
adjacent properties. .The developer may request a
reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of
constructing offsite street improvements from future
- development as it occurs.
3. Remove and replace portion Of the curb and gutter on
Base Line Road to construct a right turn lane for
the project driveway.
4. Construct a combination bus bay and right turn lane
on Rochester Avenue north of theproJect driveway.
5. Construct the portion of the Terra Vista Community
Master Planned Storm Drain System 96 (lines 6 and
6-1) from this site to Day Creek Channel. If the
project is to be constructed prior to the completion
of the Day Creek Channel, provide a retention
facility to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
6. The Terra Vista Community entry monument, if
construc=ed, shall be maintained by the developer.
7. Install the Base Line Road median landscaping from
Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue.
8. Final Parcel Map lot lines shall conform to the
approved site plan.
Resolution No. 92-169
Page 7
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992.
PLANNING CO~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Sr~ Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify tha: the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCH~R, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISS IONER~: CHITIEA
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE