Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-166 - Resolutions - (no action) NO ACTIC~~-WITHDRAWN RESOLUTI~NNO. 92-166 A RESOLUTI~ OF THE CITY ~ OF ~E CITY OF RANCF&) (~CAMC~GA, CAT.TFORN/A, D~TfING ~FF/~C~F~AL ASSES~4~T AND ~ AREA SP~/IF/C PLAN AM~qE~qT 92-02, PARP C, TO EXPAND ~ LIST OF P~rIT~D AND CONDI'Iq]ONAT,I',Y P~f[TI~D USES IN SUBAREA 7 OF ~HE INDU~ AREA SPECIFIC PLAN A. Recitals. (i) Jack Masi has filed an applicatio~ for Industrial Area Specific Plan ~ 92-02, Part C, as descr~ in the title of this Resol%fcic~. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject ~ial Area Specific Plan (ii) On March 11 and 25, 1992, the Planning Cu~Ldssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and c0~cluded said hearings on March 25, 1992. (iii) At the March 25 hearing, the ~ssion directed staff to pre~az~ a Resolution of Denial and ad~ said Resolution at the meeting of A~ril 8, 1992. (iv) On May 20, 1992, the city Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and su~ly denied Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 92-02, Part C. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. NOW, ~DRE, th~ City Oouncil of the City of Rancbm Cucamonga does b~reby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ' 2. Based upun substantial evidence ~ to this Oamcil durin~ the above-referenced public hearing on Marc~ 11 and 25, 1992, /ncluding written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to properties located within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (b) The General Plan designates the area south of Foothill Boulevard between Deer and Day Creeks as part of the Industrial Area Specific (c) The purpose of the Industrial Area Specific Plan is to provide a broad range of primarily industrial and business support activities; Resolution No. 92-166 Page2 (d) ~ne intent of the ,,Industrial Park" designation is to reserve land for light industrial uses, offioe and ad~i~istration facilities, research and develo~ labo~-a~ies, support businesses, and c~m.~rcial (e) The applicant's request w~uld add an extensive range of Furnishings and Appliances) to the list of uses already permitted in Subarea 7, Industrial Park; and (f) The extent of the retail uses requested is not consistent with the intent of Subarea 7, Industrial Park, and the retail uses proposed are c~ly apprcpriate in areas zoned "O~,~rcial"; and (g) There is already a m~re than adequate amount of land designated for such c~m,,t~rcial uses throughout the ou~m~nity. ~ to the General Plan, there are currently 819 acres of vacant land designated for a wide variety of c~L~,~rcial uses. The creatic~ of additional land z _c~ed___ for such uses w~nU adversely i~act the existing and ak~dy planned retail areas within the City; and (h) Foothill Boulevard between Day and Deer Creeks is an impo~ land use edge between the City's I_ndustrial Area and cuL,%unity- (i) Tbm intent of Subarea 7 is to function as a transitional Retail and Residential areas to the north of Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for develc~m~_nt within the district in a ~manner cons/stent with the General Plan and with related develo~a~_nt; and (b) That the proposed amendment is not co~s~ with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the d/strict in which the site is locate_; and (c) ~hat the proposed amendment is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) That the ~ a~ndm~t will be ~etr~l to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or im~=o~nte in the vicinity; and (e) That the proposed amendment will be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Resolution No. 92-166 Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragra~ 1, 2, and 3 above, this (k~ncil hereby resolves as follows: (a) ~hat the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 92-02, Part C, to a~e~d Table III-l, Page IV-48, and Table III-2, as attached. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. NOT PASS~D, ~ or ADOPI]~ this 20th day of May, 1992.