The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFebruary - April 2004 HPC Agendas THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Z AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 25, 2004 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 19, 2004, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 10, 2004 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 4, 2004, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 24, 2004 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 18, 2004, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. r l ' THE ClT'Y OF R kNCHO Cuc MONGA E ' HISTORIC-PRESERVATION COMMISSION I AGENDA RANCHO I�UCAMONGA Aplrit 14 2004 - 7:00 PIUi Rancho Cucamonga C,�ic Center Council Chambers 10.500 Ovid..Center Dave s Rancho Cucamonga, California CALZ ORDER Pledge of Allegiance i Ro1I Gall ' i� Chairman Macias Vice Chairman McKie Com. Fletcher Com McPhail Com. Stewart II ANNOUNCEMENTS I. A.PPRO V,AL OF M, NUTES February 11', 2004 IV PUBLICH AIt NGS The following;items are public hearings in which concerned indlWduals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. Ali such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per indfvidualfor each project. Please sign in after speaking . .. ..A :: : :HISTORICPO]NT OF:INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A reou6st to designate: six residences located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482,and 9494 Foothill Boulevard as:a Historic.Point'of Interest and allow relocation or demoftian;of all ar some of the subject structures - APN: 0208=141 .06, 08, Q9, 11, 13,' and 14. Relate.d Files Development District Amendment DRC2003701037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1'6567, Development Review. DRC2003701;036, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO April 14, 2004 CUCAMONGA Page 2 V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do,not already appear on this agenda. VU COMMISSION BUSINESS V11. ADJOURNMENT 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 8, 2004, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you needs enciai assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. M 1/icin �� Ma Y p Historic Preservation Cornnni sion . A r� 14 2004 p } � _. r :. .. - .-. .: r. B SPHERE- O F 1 N F L U E N GE I l l 3 � w � J � �. � � � � � ;a 'w w H1LL51D � W 4 t a � J �: ,r^ � O � .,': v+ 1W1 ' B YAN � �.�� >. `� 'p �9TH BASF LINE A 1 FoarHiu a � ' J � ARROW ' W � 4 # � w �� a ' � � x � '; Q 4TH Meeting i".ocatiOn Rancho Cucarrtonga City Hafl 1 a50C1 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga a i T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A Sta f Report DATE: April 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A request to designate six residences located at 9424, 9434,9456, 9474, 9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard as a Historic Point of Interest and to allow relocation or demolition of all or some of the subject structures-APN: 0208-141-06,08,09, 11, 13,and 14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development Review DRC2003-01036, and Tree Removal Permit. DRC2004-00139. BACKGROUND: A. Historical Significance: Most of the six residences were constructed by George and Henry Klusman circa 1932. The houses were constructed to be used by field workers in the Cucamonga area. The Klusmans were well known in the Cucamonga area and were responsible for building many important structures including reservoirs, houses, and the Virginia Dare Winery. B. Site Characteristics: Each house sits on approximately 0.14 acre. The land use zoning of the sites and the surrounding area is designated Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3), Mixed'Use. ANALYSIS General The Klusmans built the houses in the early to mid 1930s. The six homes were built to be used by local fieldworkers. These residences currently occupy the land proposed for a condominium complex. These homes would be demolished or removed in order to establish a new 156-unit condominium complex. The project site is located in a neighborhood characterized by older single-family homes interspersed with a variety of commercial and office uses along Foothill Boulevard. The loose and bifurcated arrangement of the residences occupying the site are not bound by a common link and would not fall into the category of a community or historic district. Exhibit "A" contains the Primary, Building, Structure and Object Records for the contributing buildings on the properties. Historic Point of Interest Designation:ation: The subject sites and structures qualify for Point of Interest designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including g historical and cultural significance. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings section. The requested point of interest designation relates to these sites only. Several of the residences have been altered since construction,and most have deteriorated significantly. ITEM "A" HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 14, 2004 Page 2 The House at 9494 Foothill Boulevard appears to be the most significant structure (Craftsman b ngalow design)from an architectural and relocation feasibility standpoint and therefore an appropriate mitigation (attempt to relocate off site) is provided. Although the structures have not retained their historical context, the history of the Klusmans involvement in the development of the area warrants designation as a Historic Point of Interest. In addition, staff has included conditions to assure that the historical information concerning the structures is contained on the site for informational purposes. A. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Factls: The properties were the location of housing for several families of fieldworkers, who were important to Cucamonga's agricultural era. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Factts: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area, primarily for their aptitude in construction. Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. Factls: The properties were used by several families involved with local agriculture,which is no longer a common occurrence in the Cucamonga area. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Point of Interest designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution, to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respec sub ' d Brad Buller City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Primary and Building, Structure, and Object Records Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation D RC2004-00105 A-z- State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page I of 2 *Resource Name or#Laing Homes'Due Dilioence for Parcels Along FoothillBouleyard _ P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County and (P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Locatloh Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T 1S; R7 6L ;_ 1/4 of 114 of Sec 3 ;B.M. C. Address 9424 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 I_mEL mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN:0208-141-14 *P3a. Description: The property consists of a one story single-family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame construction and has a flat roof. There are protruding architectural details at each of the corners of the roof. Basically rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing extending from the asymmetrical facade. There is also a wood frame addition with wood siding at the back elevation. The exterior walls and chimney are clad with original stucco. A dropped secondary porch roof at the front entrance is covered with terra Gotta tiles. The primary elevation has a decorative detail of three mission terra Gotta tiles embedded in a triangular shape. The wood windows appear to be original with a six pane casement window as well as two adjacent double hung sash windows on the facade. There are mostly double hung sash windows on the other elevations. The front door has been replaced. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ®Element of District []Other(Isolates, etc.) _ P51J. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession#) *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: ® Historic ❑ Prehistoric _- ' ❑ Both -r approximately 1932 / *P7. Owner and Address: Huang Family Trust Go Arthur Huang "i 17121 Los Robles Circle Fountain Valley,CA 92708 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) Lori Shriver-Planning Aide 10500 Civic Cerlter Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 917, *P9. Date Recorded, 02/0 ?004 P10. Survey Type: Section 106 Compliance Project Review /. *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".)Survey by Christeen Taniguchi.April 3.2003 r *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map El Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure,and Object Retard ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): DPR 523a(1195) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Gode 6Z Page-?-of f. - *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Bpuleyard� B1. Historic Name: ngoe B2. Common Name: B3. Original Use: vale family residence f• 64, Present Use: single family residence or greenhouse *Ba. Architectural Style: *136. Construction History: (Construction date,alterations,and date of alterations) The building was constructed circa 1932. There is a one story wood addition at the back of the property. *B7. Moved? No®Yes ❑ Unknown ❑ Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: i The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage. B9a. Architect:unknown b. Builder: unknown *1310. Significance: Theme: Residential Architect Area: Cucamonga Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA The building was constructed circa 1932,according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County. This, along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman Avenues,was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry,with H.H.Thomas. They were constructed for. the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The houses were described as"five room modem homes"in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Laurabel Gardiner in 1946. The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. Although still a single family residence in appearance,the building is listed as a"greenhouse" under the current Use Code by the San Bernardino tax assessors. The property has a wood frame single story addition in the back. Otherwise there appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not otherwise associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, perior, or method of construction. Based on this review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP - Singl familyIli *B12. References: 41312QQ3 study by Christeen Taniguchi Sketch Map with north arrow required. B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning_Aide___ *Date of Evaluation: February 3, 200 (This space reserved for official comments) AA State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page_9of 3 *Resource Name or#Laing Homes'Due Q'Iluence for Parcels Along Foothill, B,,Rl,llevarcl 131. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and(P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T 1S,R7}L 114 of 114 of Sec 3; B.M. C. Address 9434 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone JQ_' mEl mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN:0208-1<41-13 *P3a. Description: This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame construction and has a flat roof. There are protruding architectural details at each of the comers of the roof. Basically rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing extending from the asymmetrical fagade;the wing shares a continuous terra Gotta file roof with the front porch. The exterior walls are clad with original stucco. The primary elevation has a decorative detail of three mission terra Gotta tiles embedded in a triangular shape. The wood windows appear to be original with a non-original(but early addition)awning above the center windows; most of the others are double hung sash windows. The front door and screen door appear to be original. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑Structure ❑ Object ❑Site ❑ District ®Element of District ❑Other(Isolates, etc.) Y _ P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession#) February 19,2004 r *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and Source: ® Historic ❑ Prehistoric `- ❑ Both approximately 1932 - W. Owner and Address: Rancho Cucamcnoa Redevelopment 6opnCY r 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonaa.CA 91730 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) Lori Shriver- Planning Aide 10500 Civic Center Drive Ranrha Qanamonga,_CA 91730 *P9. Date Recorded: 02/03/2004 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".)Survey by Christeen Taniguchl._April 3._20Q3 r *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ®Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure,and Object Record r. ., ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record [—]Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): DPR 523a (1195) \� *Required information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Ode 6Z Page 2—of .1 _ *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along_Foothill Boulevard B1, Historic Name: none B2. Common Name: none B3. Original Use: Single family residence__ --__- --_-- - -_ -_- B4. Present Use: single family residence r "B5. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival -_ *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations,and date of alterations) The property has an original concrete driveway but does not appear to have a garage. *137. Moved? No ®Yes❑ Unknown ❑ Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage. i 139a. Architect:unknown b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme:Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA The building was constructed circa 1932, according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County. This, along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry, with H.H. Thomas. They were constructed for the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The houses were described as "five room modern homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Steve and Lillie DeAmbrogio in 1942. The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence. (continued) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) #-1P2- Single family dwelling,,, ,._._,. ...—... *B12. References: 4/3/2003 study by Christeen Taniguchi Sketch Map with north arrow required. B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide *Date of Evaluation: February 3 2004 (This space reserved for official comments) DPR 523J (1/95) �� *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET HRI# Trinomial Page--of 3 *Resource Name or## (Assigned by recorder) Record by: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide Date: FebruarV 3 2004 ® Continuation ® Update r 9434 Eoothill Boulevard. There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not otherwise associated with 'a recognized architect or a significant type, perior, or method of construction. Based on this review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry. Ar� DPR 523J (1i95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Cod 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or#Laing ' is ..'gence for Parcels Alang Foothill Boulevard _ P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T`"'15; R7)IL 114 of_1/4 of Sec 3 ; B.M. C. Address 9456 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 1 mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN:0208-141-11 *P3a. Description: This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame construction and has a flat roof. There are terra Gotta tiles along the cornice. Nearly rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing extending from the asymmetrical facade with an extended terra Gotta file roof;the adjacent porch has a dropped roof also clad with identical tiles. The exterior walls and chimney are clad with original stucco. The wood windows appear to be original, although there is one newer metal frame window on the west elevation. The front door and screen door appear to be original. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good. 1 *1133b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ®Element of District ❑Othetr P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession#) February 19,2004 I�ApyYb 1, _ *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: ® Historic ❑ Prehistoric r <:- ❑ Both approximately 1932 W. Owner and Address: Yuzo Hayashi P.O. Box 578 Alta Loma, CA 91701 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) Lori hriver- Planning Aide 10500 Civic Center Drive RaI3rhn(:firmmnngiq CA 91730 r *P9. Date Recorded: 02/03/2004 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Survey by Christeen Taniguchi,April 3._2043 *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ❑Continuation Sheet , ®Building Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record []Other(List): DPR 523a(1/95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Code 6Z Page 2—of.2 *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard B1. Historic Name: lone B2. Common Name: none - B3. Original Use: 500gle family residence B4. Present Use: single family residence _. *135. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Reviyal *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations,and date of alterations) The building was constructed circa 1932 and retains its original plot size. *B7. Moved? No ®Yes ❑ Unknown ❑ Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage. 139a. Architect: unknown _ b. Builder: unknown *1310. Significance: Theme:Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: NIA The building was constructed circa 1932,according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County. This, along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry,with H.M.Thomas. They were constructed for the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The houses were described as"five room modem homes"in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Mary C. Klusman in 1953, The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence. There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, period, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this review,the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family residence *B12. References: 413/2003 study by Chrigteen Taniguhi Sketch Map with north arrow required. B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide_ (This space reserved for official comments) DPR 523J (1195) State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Cod 6Z Other Listings Review Code Code Reviewer Date Page I of 2 *Resource Name or#Laing Homes'Acre Dijigenre for Parcels Along oothill BoulevartL... P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestridted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti,CA'Date 1981 1''1S; R7)8L ;_ 1/4 of 114 of Sec 3 ; B.M. C. Address 9474 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 W.' mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN:0208-141-09 *P3a. Description: This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame construction and has a flat roof. Nearly rectangular in plan, there is a wing with gable roof extending from the fagade; at the junction between the wing and the rest of the house the main roof is slanted to accommodate the gable. The ectedor walls are clad with original stucco. The wood windows appear to be original with three adjacent six pane windows prominent on the fagade. There are mostly double hung sash windows on the other elevations. One window on the fagade was replaced with those that lowered. The front screen door has been replaced with a recent metal security door. The building is in fair condition. its integrity is good. I *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ®Element of District ❑Other(isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession##) *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: ® Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both approximately 1929 W. Owner and Address: Huang } i Family Trust cJo Arthur Huang 17121 Los Robles Circle N. Fountain Valley,CA 92708 ai *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) Lori Shriver-Planninci Aide 10500 CivicCenter Drive Ranrhn Cucamonga_ CA 91730 _ *P9. Date Recorded: 02/12/2004 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Survey y Christeen Taniguchi.April 3.2003 *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ❑Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure,and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rack Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): DPR 523a(1/95) ,O *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Code 6Z Page-2— _of-2._.^_ *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard B1. Historic Name: none ., B2. Common Name: none B3. Original Use: single family residence B4. Present Use: single family residence *135. Architectural Style: $pan'gh Colonial Revival *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations,and date of alterations) The building was constructed circa 1929 and retains its original plot size. *137. Moved? No ®Yes ❑ Unknown ❑ Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage. B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknomtn *1310. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture_ ____Area: Qucamonaa A' Period of Significance: c. 1929 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: NIA e The building was constructed circa 1929, according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County. This,along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry,with H.H.Thomas. They were constructed for the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bemardino County. The houses were described as"five room modem homes"in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Ralph and Vivian Santolucito in 1941. The Kiusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence. There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, period, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this review,the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family property *1312. References: 41 1 tudy by.Christeen T ni hi Sketch Map with north arrow required. B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide (This space reserved for official comments) 4 �11 DPR 523J (1195) State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Cod 6Z Other Listings I Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or#Laing Homes' Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and(P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) 3 *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 7'1S; R7W ;_ 114 of_114 of Sec 3 ; B.M. C. Address 9482 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone mEl mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN:0208-141-08 *P3a. Description: This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame construction and has a flat roof. There are terra Gotta tiles along the cornice, which has a modified step design. Basically rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing with dropped gable terra Gotta We roof extending from the asymmetrical fagade cylindrical terra Gotta tiles embedded into the wall above the porch as a decorative detail. There is an early wood addition at the back of the house, with a half gable roof. There is also a wood structure with wood doors that lead into the basement. The windows on the facade have been replaced with those that are metal frame;this includes a prominent picture window./The original wood frame windows on the other elevations appear to be intact. The front door does not appear to be original, and the screen door has been replaced by a metal security gate. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good. E *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property i *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ®Element of District ❑Other(Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession#) 4 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: ® historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑Both r, r oproximately 1929 i - =4 ° w� *P7. Owner and Address: Rancho w Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency 10500 Civic Center Dr. M Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 { *P8. Recorded by: n (Name,affiliation,and address) 's Lori Shriver- Planning Aide Rarrchn_Qmnmcnga,CA 917.10 *P9. Date Recorded:0 211 2/2 0 04 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Survey,_b -Qhristgen Taniguchi,April 3._2003___ *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ❑Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure,and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): DPR 523a(1/95) A\ , *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Code 6Z Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard B1, Historic Name: none B2. Common Name: none 83. Original Use: single family residence B4. Present Use: single family residence *135. Architectural Style: , 5 apish Colonial Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date,alterations,and date of alterations) The building was constructed circa 1929 and retains its original plot size. *137. Moved? No®Yes❑ Unknown ❑ mate: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property has what appears to be an original garage with an early masonry addition at its east side. 139a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga Period of Significance: c. 1929 Property Type:single family residence Applicable Criteria: NIA The building was constructed circa 1929, according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County. This,along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry,with H.H.Thomas. They were constructed for ' the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The houses were described as"five room modem homes"in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Henry Klusman in 1936. In 1946,the property came under the ownership of Julio and Monica Danzo. By 1947, the property was owned by John and Rosaria Camesi. The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence. There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities. in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, period, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this review,the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family orgperty *1312. References, 4/3/2003 study by Qhristeen Taniguc 1 Sketch Map with north arrow required. 1313. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide (This space reserved for official comments) DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Cod 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page I ----of 2 *Resource Dame or#Laing Homes'Due Dillgence for Parcels Along Foothill-Boulevard_ P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ®Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and(P2c, P2e,and P21J or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti, CA 'Date 1981 'T"`1S S. WILL ;____ 1/4 of�1/4 of Sec 3 ; B.M. C. Address 9494 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 1 mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN: 0208-141-06 *P3a. Description: This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Craftsman style with cross-gable roof,there are a total of seven gables located on all but the west side of the house. The roof is of asphalt shingles,a non-original material used. There are three columns with battered sides at each of the outer comers of the L-shaped porch with concrete stairs leading up to it. The building has exposed roof beams and rafter tails with wide, unendosed eave overhangs. The chimey is red brick. The wood windows with multiple panes are typical of the Craftsman style. Those at and near the rear of the house tend to be double-hung sash windows. The front and rear doors have replacement metal security doors. The building is in fair condition. Iiis integrity is good. I *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present:: ® Building ❑Structure ❑ Object [:] Site ❑ District ]Element of District ❑Other (Isolates, etc.) P51J. Description of Photo: (view, date,accession#) 2/19/2004 *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and Source: ® Historic ❑ Prehistoric .r"� iy>y,,•,, ❑ Both approximately 1927 € *P7. Owner and Address: Huang Family Trust Go Arthur Huang 17121 Los Robles Circle Fountain Valley,CA 92708 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) ,,. ` r Lori Shdver-Planning Aide a�cs. F 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rnnchn Qucamanrjn, CA 91730 *P9. Date Recorded: /1 4 *P10. Survey, Tyl2e, Compliance Project Review *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Survey by Christeen_Taniguchi,April 3.2003 *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ❑Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record _]Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): DPR 523a (1/95) q *Re wired information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE,AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Code 6Z Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or# Laing Homes'Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard B1. Historic Name: none B2. Common Name: none B3. Original Use: sinal_e_family residence 134. Present Use: single family residence *135. Architectural Style: , Craftsman Bungalow *136. Construction History: (Construction date,alterations,and date of alterations) The building was constructed circa 1927 and retains its original plot size. *137. Moved? No ®Yes ❑ Unknown ❑ Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: The property has a masonry garage that was built at an unknown date, but is not original. B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown *1310. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga _ Period of Significance: c. 1929 Property Type:single family residence Applicable Criteria: NIA Henry W. Klusman was the owner of the property when tax assessment for the builiding began in 1927. He had obtained the property from his brother George Klusman in 1926 when it was assessed for land only. Henry,Klusman was the owner until at least 1953. The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of Rancho Cucamonga. This Craftsman style house appears to have retained most of its significant architectural features and is in good condition. However, the property does not contribute to a cohesive neighborhood and is not otherwise associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, period,or method of construction. Based on this review,the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, appear to be potentially eligible for local listing for its association with a locally important family and for being an intact example of its architectural style. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 Slnale f@mily roomy *1312. References: 4/3/2003 study by Christeen Taniguchi Sketch Map with north arrow required. 1313. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planninq Aide (This space reserved for official comments) DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information RESOLUTION NO. 04-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2004-00105, DESIGNATING SIX HOUSES BUILT BY THE KLUSMANS, AS A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482,AND 9494 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0208-141-06, 08, 09, 11, 13, AND 14. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Historic Point of Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Point of Interest is referred to as "the application." 2. On April 14, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 0.85 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Sicnificance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Factls: The properties were the location of housing for several families of fieidworkers, who were important to Cucamonga's agricultural era. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Factls: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area, primarilyfortheir aptitude in construction. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04.04 HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 April 14, 2004 Page 2 Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. Facts: The properties were used by several families involved with local agriculture, which is no longer a common occurrence in the Cucamonga area. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Historic Point of Interest Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (historical resource restorationfrehabilitation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The "Historic Point of Interest' designation is merely recognition for historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations. The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 on the 14th day of April, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1) The house (structure) at 9494 Foothill Boulevard shall be offered to the public for relocation or salvage for a period of 30 days prior to demolition. 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Planner plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified structures. Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed prior to the first occupancy of any Motor Court town home. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of April 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: n A - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-04 HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 April 14, 2004 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1� THE CITY OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGEN®A, RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 28, 2004 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center . Council Chambers 1 osoo Civic .Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias Vice Chairman McNiel _ Fletcher__ McPhail Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS IIL APPROVAL OF IVINUTES April 14, 2004 IV. PUBLIC 1IEAR1NGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. LANDMARK DESIGNATION D RC2003-01073-JUDY SPAULDING et.al. - A request to designate 26 Walnut trees lining Beryl Avenue north of Hillside Road and south of Carrari Court as a Designated Local Landmark - APN: 1061-371-26, 27, 28, 29, 31, and 40. B. LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-01046-RUCH-A request to convert an existing residence., the local historic landmark Cour House, into a real estate office . and construct a parking lot in the Office/Professional District, located at 7567 Etiwanda'Avenue. Relates{ Files: Tree Removal -Permit DRC2004-00166 and ' Sign. Permit DRC2003-01 091 - APN: 1100-031-06. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO April 28, 2004 CUCAMONGA Page 2 V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VY: COMMISSION BUSINESS V11. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Division Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April22,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. a-T-� If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Y .: .. _:. .. � .:; _:. ._. .; V V�CIn t �� y p � � � �stor�c Preseruat�on Comrr��ssion e A r� � 28 20�4 p A' a � � S P H E R E o f I N F L U E N C E � z ;. � W Q � J � � xt w w HILLSID w w a '� '`� � o � ..... 4 . _ 79TH BASE L1NE '_ B i FOOTHILL � ARROW w � o Q z � � x � � � ; � � � z ' � x � � � 4TH ` �"' Meeting Location: Rancho Cucamonga City Nall 1'0590 Civic Cen#er Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O F Rnrtcxo Cucnr� oHcn Staff Report DATE: April 28, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Shonda Bello, Planning Aide SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2003-01073 - JUDY SPAULDING et.al. - A request to designate 26 Walnut trees lining Beryl Avenue north of Hillside Road and south of Carrari Court as a Designated Local Landmark -APN: 1061-371-26, 27, 28, 29, 31, and 40. Staff requests a continuance of the public hearing on this item to May 12, 2004, as Mrs. Judy Spaulding,the applicant and leader of the Landmark Designation effort,will be out of town attending to family business, and would like to be present for the public hearing. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley_ Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 600400t radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission continue the public hearing for Landmark Designation DRC2003-01073, without further public notice to May 12, 2004. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SBIjm ITEM A T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: Apri128, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission . FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: 'Shonda Bello, Historic Preservation Planning Aide SUBJECT: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-01046 - RUCH - A request to convert an existing residence, the local historic landmark Cour House, into a real estate office and construct a parking lot in the Office/Professional District, located at.7567 Etitivanda Avenue. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00166 and Sign Permit DRC2003-01091 - APN: 1100-031-06. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Historical Significance: Constructed in approximately 1914, this Dutch Colonial style home was a particularly popular architectural style between 1900 and 1930. Less expensive to construct than traditional two-story structures, the Swedish gambrel roof offers the unique combination of maximum floor space with minimal second-story costs. The home is at least 80 years old and is a significant architectural element of the former Etiwanda Colony Lands. The garage appears to be of recent modern construction and, although compatible with the historic character, is not part of the landmark designation. B. Site Characteristics: The site is primarily flat, with drainage flowing in a southerly direction. Two structures are on the property, the house and garage. Surrounded by a few mature trees, the house sits on a raised rock foundation. Most structural elements remain intact, with the exception the removal of two rock chimneys by a pervious owner. Currently, the property falls within the Office/Professional District of the Development Code. ANALYSIS: 1. General: The residence and garage are in very good condition with the significant exterior features having been retained. The house is a one and one-half story design with a front porch. The conversion of the structure from residence to office use will not alter the house t itself; a parking lot, monument sign, and addition of a handicapped ramp are the only exterior changes to the property. Currently, nine heritage trees are located on the ITEM B HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2003-01046 - RUCH April 28, 2004 Page 2 property. All, with the exception of one California Sycamore, are being retained and incorporated into the proposed alterations. 2. Landmark Alteration: The Landmark Alteration consists of the adding of a handicapped ramp, parking lot, and monument sign. The proposed new Site Plan and parking lot plan has been delivered to the Commission under separate cover and is also available for review at the Planning Department. The monument sign will be installed at the western entrance of the property. The proposed design is intended to be architecturally compatible and still be historically separate from the existing structures. Only the design, scale, and massing are part of the Landmark Alteration Application. The applicant must submit a separate Sign Application Permit for the text to appear on the sign. Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance, the text will be limited to the names of those companies conducting business within the Cour House structure. 3. Conditions of Approval: In order for the Landmark Alteration permit to be approved, the following conditions must be met: a. The railing that was once above the mansard on the west and east elevations of the home must be restored. See historical photo for reference. b. All exterior, exposed sides of stairs and ramp must be clad in river rock. C. The applicant must submit a separate Sign Application Permit for the text on the monument sign located at the western property entrance. d. Temporary curbing is to be installed as the edge treatment in the driveway and parking area. e. Remove drive apron at the northern access from Etiwanda Avenue. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. 4, FACTS FOR FINDING: The proposed Landmark Alteration meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24,120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: FINDING: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance. FACT: The Landmark Alteration as presented will enhance and promote the preservation of this historic landmark. FINDING: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature. FACT: The proposed modifications are architecturally compatible and will enhance the continued use of the structure on the property. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2003-01046 - RUCH April 28, 2004 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item does not require advertising as a public hearing; however, the subject property was posted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, s'l Brad Buller City Planner BB:SBIma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Primary Record Exhibit 'B" - Building, Structure, and Object Report Draft Resolution of Approval for Historical Landmark Alteration DRC2003-01046 i v State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cour House P1. Other Identifier: W. Location: ❑Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2c, P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date 1966 T IS ;RSyV S 1/2 of NW 1/4 of SecA E.M. C. Address 7567 Etiwanda Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91739 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone _' mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) Assessor's Parcel Number: 1100-031-06 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, conditions, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Constructed in approximately 1914,this Dutch Colonial style home was particularly popular between 1900 and 1930. Less expensive to construct than traditional two-story structures,the Swedish gambrel roof architecture offers the unique combination of maximum floor space with minimal second-story costs. The home is at least eighty years old and is a significant architectural element of the former Etlwanda Colony Lands. The garage appears to be of recent modern construction and, although compatible with the historic character,is not part of the landmark designation. The site is primarily flat,with drainage flowing in a southerly direction. Two structures are on the property,the house and garage. Surrounded by a few mature trees,the house sits on a raised rock foundation. Most structural elements remain intact,with the exception of a previous owners removal of two rock chimneys. Currently,the property falls with in the Office/Professional zoning of the development code. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single family property *P4. Resource Present: ® Building ❑ Structure ❑Object ❑ Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other P5b. Description of Photo: (view, li ;* +��c ; •: date,accession#) P6. Date Constructed/Age and❑Source: Historic Prehistoric `w s „,�. ❑ Both Aparoximately Qgl]EJrUqted in1 14 an*P7. Owner and Address: Ethan • Ruch,7567 Etiwanda Avenue Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91739 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,and address) Lori Shriver,City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10500__civic_ tenter Rancho Cucamonga,CA,91730 *P9. Date Recorded: 11/24_ /2003 10. Survey Type. (Describe): Reconnaissance *P11. Report Citation: Survey by Larry Henderson, 1995. County of San Bernardino Tax Assessor Records *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑Location Map ❑Continuation Sheet ®Building Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record []Linear Feature Record []Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other(List): ® DPR 523a(1/95) Required information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI# *NRHP Status Code Page 2 -o# 2 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) Cour House 131. Historic Name: Qour House E32, Common Name: Qour House B3. Original Use: 134. Present Use: Residence (applying for use as Professional Office *135. Architectural Style: Dutch Colonial *136. Construction History: (Construction date,alterations, and date of alterations) Constructed in approximately 1914. Alterations consist of removal of two earthquake-damaged chimneys in 1990, Garage addition of similar character at an unknown date. *B7. Moved? No ® Yes ❑ Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: t lnknown b. Builder• Uoknown *B10. Significance: Period of Significance: 1q00-1940 Property Type: Residential _ Applicable Criteria: I onai Landmark Constructed in approximately 1914, this structure was occupied by a number of E=tiwanda families, including the Cours, Tildens Hayes and Hawkinson's. The structure is well known within the Etiwanda area due to the unique architecture and retention of its historical integrity. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References, S r!ey-b". Henderson (1295)— 1313. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver- Plannin Aide m North Garage *Date of Evaluation: November 24, 2003 (This space reserved for official comments) LU 7567 DPR 523b (1195) [ACROBAT WEBDOC Posted 11198] *Required information RESOLUTION NO. 04-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2003-01046,FOR ALTERATIONS AT THE HISTORIC COUR HOUSE LOCATED AT 7576 ETIWANDA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-06. A. Recitals. 1. Ethan Ruch filed an application for the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the April 28, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved bythe Historic Preservation 6 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 28, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 7567 Etiwanda Avenue is presently improved with the historic Cour house with a street frontage of 95 feet and lot depth of 189.39 feet. The Landmark Designation excludes the more recently built garage. b. The propertyto the north of the subject site is the historic Koch house,the property to the south is vacant land and further to the south is the Post Office; the property to the east is developed with the Interstate 15 Freeway, and the property to the west is Etiwanda Avenue and beyond is Etiwanda Gardens banquet facility; and C. The Cour house,on the property of the proposed application,was designated as an Historic Landmark by the City Council on February 21, 1996, by adoption of City Council Resolution No. 96-013; and d. The application proposes using the Cour house as a real estate office. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public Dearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ?)[P HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05 DRC2003 --01 046 - COUR HOUSE - RUCH April 28, 2004 Page 2 a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the Landmark Alteration Permit, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use,complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in paragraphs 1, 2,and 3 above,This Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-01046, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The project must be completed as Site Plans and Elevations dated April 28, 2004. 2) Temporary curbing to be installed at edge of drive and parking area. 3) Exterior, exposed side of handicap accessible ramp to be constructed of river rock. 4) Monument Sign is approved only for materials, massing, and location. The sign, and text is subject to a Sign Permit Application. 5) Remove north drive approach. Engineering 1) There is a possibility that an application to vacate Candlewood Street maybe made by the applicant for SUBTT164541DRC2003-00101. if Candlewood Street is not going to be constructed,driveway access will be limited to Etiwanda Avenue and shall meet Commercial standards, including a 35-foot minimum width and 300-foot spacing with respectto adjacent driveways and 100 feet distant from the intersection. Master planning access to and shared access with the adjacent site to the south will need to be proposed as an alternative should Cottonwood Street not be constructed. 2) Install public improvements on Etiwanda Avenue frontage per City "Major" standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Figure 5-23); including pavement, cobble curb and gutter,sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights. 0-4- HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05 DRC2003 —01 046 - COUR HOUSE - RUCH April 28, 2004 r. Page 3 b) Provide shared access driveway approach in accordance with the City Driveway Policy, minimum 300-foot separation between driveway centerlines, including those on adjacent Nat-a-Part properties, and 100-foot minimum from the Candlewood Street intersection (measured from BCR to near the edge of the driveway). Install Commercial Drive Approach with a minimum width of 35 feet in accordance with City Standard Plan No. 101, Type-C. c) Provide signage and striping and protect existing R26 "No Parking" signs or replace. d) Provide a Class II Bike Lane on Etiwanda Avenue. e) Dedicate additional right-of-way on Etiwanda Avenue to achieve a total of 50 feet measured from the centerline of the street. 3) Construction of the Candlewood Street frontage will be deferred until the north adjacent property is developed. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of Cottonwood Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be based on the estimated cost of constructing the south half of the street, to City. 'Local"standards,across the northerly frontage of the project site. The estimated construction cost shall include sidewalk, residential drive approach,street trees,streetlights,signage and striping, PCC curb and gutter, and pavement section for the south one-half street width. 4) An interim Commercial Drive Approach (Standard Plan 101, Type-C) will be allowed on Etiwanda Avenue as long as it is labeled "to be removed upon construction of Cottonwood Street." Alternately, if a shared drive approach is located at least 100 feet south of the future Candlewood Street BCR and an access easement is provided, ultimate drive approach may not require removal. 5) The master plan storm drain in Etiwanda Avenue is being installed by the developer of SUBTT16454/DRC2003-00101. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 6) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drains. Extend the local storm drain system as far as Etiwanda Avenue as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. HPC RESOLUTION NO. 04-05 DRC2003—01 046 - COUR HOUSE - RUCH April 28, 2004 Page 4 7) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66kV electrical) on the project side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuahce of permits. The fee shall be the City adopted unit amount times the length of the entire project frontage. Building and Safety Division NOTE: The change of use requires a change of occupancy submittal to the Building Department, and an architect must stamp and sign the plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of April 2004,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ?79 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2003-01046 SUBJECT: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT FOR THE COUR HOUSE APPLICANT: EHTAN RUCH LOCATION: 7567 ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANTSHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION,(909)477-2750,FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-05, Standard 1 Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include1 site plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions _I I of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC-1-04 1 E70 Project No.DRC2003-01046 Completion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _lam consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved _I / by the City Planner and Police Department(477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. S. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,berming,andlor landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single- family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. DRC2003-01046. Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. 11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. It a double wall 1 1 condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 12. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured / products. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _lam projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. SC»1-04 2 Project No.DRC2003-01046 Completion date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction,the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer,and Rancho _I I Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development,private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/ 1 parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent, The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. F. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily 1 I residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces,whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided,additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category-5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other / 1 non-residential development. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _I I the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods, SC-i-04 3 Project No.DRC2003-01046 Completion Date 3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ^1 1 perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 4. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 5. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval 1_ prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve wafer through the principles ofl I Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 1. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number,(i.e.,SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _I_I the City prior to permit issuance. SC-1-04 4 J Project No.DRC2003.01046 Completion Date 4. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the `ll� Building and Safety Division. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall bell_____ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance. 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / 1 through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. L. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances _/ 1 considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Due to the scope of the project, an Occupancy Change review is required. Submit plans to the / _ 1 Building and Safety Division to determine compliance for the proposed use. 3. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required. 4. The project shall be designed to comply with CBC Section 504 regarding mixed occupancy ratio. 5. Provide required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29. 6. All exiting must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated ^/--J_ corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue. 1 I 30 total feet on Candlewood Street 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. __J SC-1-04 2 5 1'� Project No.DRC2003-01046 Completion Date N. Street Improvements 1, Pursuant to City Council Resolution No.88-557,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances,all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X X Candlewood Street (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) if so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _I 1 construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. G. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Cityll� Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. SC-1-04 6 I Project No.DRC2003-01046 Com legion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ^l J adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash f deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded ` upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program, and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-23, as directed by the City Engineer. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed 1� legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing 'Size oty. Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red Gum 8 ft. 30 ft.o.c. 5-gal. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with1 I adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. O. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _1 Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. P. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, t electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. SC-1-04 7 Z/ r Proiect No. DRC2003-01046 Completion Date 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / 1 Cucamonga County W ater District(CCW D),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first,for: Etiwanda Avenue. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all 1 new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909)477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Before the building could be approved for its new use,a complete set of plans for the change of occupancy must be submitted to the Building Division for fire and building review. Technical issues will be reviewed at that time. SC-1-04 ' a