HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Planner Minutes 1997-1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTE
Regular Meeting
December 7, 1999
Can Coleman, Principal Planner,called the Regular Meeting of the City of Manche Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga„California.
STAFF PRESENT Clan Coleman, Principal Planner, Donald ganger, Planning Technician,
Lois Schrader, Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENT
No announcements were made at this time.
MINUTES
Minutes from the November 23, 1999 meeting were approved.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-43-WILLIAM AND BERNAI ETTE DUNCAN—A request to
construct a 999 square foot second dwelling unit on a 20,000 square toot lot in the Very-Low
Residential District, located at 9573 Sunflower Street — APN: 10 2-231-12. (This item
continued from November 23, 1999
The staff report was presented by Donald Granger, Planning Technician:
[fan Coleman, Principal Planner,stated he would be the hearing officer for today`s meeting because
the City Planner is,attending to City business out of town. Mr.Coleman then asked Donald Granger
if he had spoken to the applicants since the last meeting and if he had received a copy of the
Codes„ Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's).
Donald Granger stated he had been in contact with the applicant and that none of the neighbors
supplied a copy of the CC&R's, but that the applicant brought a copy of them with her to the
meeting. (The copy was received and filed by the secretary)
r. Coleman noted that the CC&R's have been raised as an issue of conflict among the neighbors,
but that during research on the CC&R's, staff has discovered that the neighbors raising the issue are
in fact residing on property located in a separate tract wrap and that the neighborhood has several
subdivisions since it was built in phases, Mr.Coleman then asked if Mr.Granger had consulted the
City Attorney with regard to the CC&R's,
Donald Granger responded that he has consulted the City Attorney and that the Attorney advises
that the State preempts a municipality from denying a second dwelling unit based upon CC&R's.
City Planner Minutes Page 1 December 7, 1999
r. Coleman added that his research supports this finding as well and that the State encourages
second dwelling units as a limited form of affordable housing. He continued by noting that the State
sets up the parameters for this type of housing and that the City is obligated to comply with the law.
r. Coleman also asserted that the &R's are private contracts that are legally binding between
the homeowners that enter into them, but they are not binding or enforceable by the City,specifically
noting that the enforcement of these agreements occurs in two ways. 1) By the Homeowner's
Association or, )By the individual property owners that are parties of the agreement. Mr.Coleman
commented that condition number S of the resolution of Approval found on page At 8 of the agenda
has been added which states:"Approval of this request does not waive or override the requirement
of the property owner to adhere to the requirements set forth in any C &R's applicable to this
property." Mr. Coleman also noted that the proposed project meets all of the requirements of the
City and that Staff continues to recommend approval.
Mr. Coleman allowed the hearing to continue at this time, by inviting interested parties to comment
on the project.
Michael Gunn„ P.O. Box 661,Anguarnga,stated he is the prospective builder of the second dwelling
unit,and that his research indicates the &R's presented by the applicant expired on January 1,
1987,and that normally when these agreements expire,the homeowners collectively renew them for
a period of 10 or 20 years.
Bernadette Duncan, 9878 Sunflower Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she is the applicant and
that her husband is the original owner of the home and that they have no knowledge of a committee,
association, or extensions of the .R's and that it is her belief that there are no current CC&R's on
the property,
Mr. Coleman asked how long they had lived there.
Mrs, Duncan replied that her husband bought the property in '1981.
Mr. Coleman asked when the home was built,
Mrs.;Duncan thought it was in 1980.
Michael Dunn stated that the &R's were recorded in 1977 and therefore would presume the
home was built prior to that date.
Vern Evans, 5988 Klusman Avenue,Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the approval of the project was
in fact creating R-2 property on what is currently Rm1, low density property, and that if it is allowed in
this instance, would it be allowed for anyone.
Mr. Coleman affirmed that State law allows special exceptions for second dwelling units in R-1
zones and that the local ordinance does have certain requirements which must be met by the
property owner such as a minimum 10,000 square foot lot to provide the necessary land for the
primary dwelling as well as space for the second unit and to provide buffering between neighbors so
as to minimize the impact of the second unit. Mr. Coleman stressed that second dwelling units are
only allowed if all of the requirements are met. Mr. Coleman distributed copies of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code regulations for second dwelling units.
Mr. Evans asked if the unit can be used as a rental.
Mr. Coleman replied that they can under State law and local ordinance:
Mr. Evans then asked why the City would notify the residents about the hearing if in fact they have
no say in the matter.
City Planner Minutes; page 2 December 7, 199
Mr.Coleman stated that the City ordinance requires notifying the neighbors and that a public hearing
is also required,but that there are other concerns about which the public does have a voice,such as
the location of the proposed dwelling on the lot in relation to the neighbor's propertyµ
r. Evans voiced his frustration by stating again that the City is allowing a R-2 unit that can be a
rental property and that he has "no say" in the matter, and that the notification; therefore, has no
value.
r.Coleman responded by saying the City can not deny the application if it meets all State and City
requirements.
Hearing no further comments, Mr. Coleman closed the public hearing.
Mr.Coleman then reiterated that allowing second dwelling units is a State mandate and that the City
would prefer not to have a law written in this way but that the City is obligated to abide by State law.
Mr. Coleman added that from the public testimony he has not heard specific objections to this
proposed unit but he has heard general objections to the State law. Mr. Coleman their approved
Conditional Use Permit 99-48 by adoption of the Resolution and noted that the approval of the
project has a 10 day period for appeal,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
MENTS
No comments were made at this time:
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at :20 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
i
City Manner Minutes Page 3 December 7, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
November 23, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2.00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF,PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Doug Fenn; Associate Planner; Warren
Morelion,Assistant Planner, Donald Granger,Planning Technician;Lois
Schrader, Secretary.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time
MINUTES
Minutes for November 9, 1999 were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,99-43,-,T[IE BEERHUNTER SPORTS PUB AND GRILL-
quest to establish a sports bar, arcade and billiards in conjunction with a restaurant
within an existing building in a [eased space of 8,849 square feet, in the Regional Related
Commercial District of the Foothill Marketplace center, located at 12809 Foothill Boulevard
-AP : 229-031-14.
Doug Fenn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Bob Thomas, 12809 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is the applicant and had
no questions.
Mr. Brad Buller asked what he ( the applicant) intended to do differently from the previous tenant
(MVP) that would help his business be successful.
Mr. Thomas replied that his company has 10 years experience and that there would probably be
some differences in management, Mr. Thomas also noted that they are spending $400,000 in
televisions alone and that they are more of a restaurant with a sports theme and that they had
worked hard to refine their cooking and menu to give top quality at a reasonable price. He also
noted that they run a tight organization with several locations in operation,
Mr. Buller noted that the Foothill Marketplace attracts many cars and traffic and that the location is
busy.
Dave Garcia, 5270 Smokey Mountain Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked where the exact location
of the business would be.
Mr. Buller stated that the proposed project is located between the Food 4 Less and the Michael's
Arts and Crafts store within the Foothill Marketplace center.
Bob Thomas noted that the plaster is failing away from the historical fountain in the courtyard and
that the fountain is not operational at this time.
Mr. Buller indicated that the fountain is an historical element for the purposes of enhancing the
decor and theme of the center, Mr. Buller asked Doug Fenn to follow up on the state of the fountain
and determine its disrepair and to work with the property manager to take care of it.
Bob Thomas asked if additional lighting options can be considered, specifically "up-lighting."
Mr. Buller indicated that typically we prefer more light than less for security reasons and to work
with Mr. Fenn.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller reminded the applicant that there are to be no illegal signs or banners and that he
expects the applicant to comply with the City's Sign Ordinance and that he should contact the
planner for direction along the lines of the sign program.
Mr. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 99-43.
B. CQNDITIONAL USE PERMITaq-51 - ;DAVID AND CIF SSICA GAR IA A request to
construct a 900 square foot second dwelling unit within an existing 1,600 square foot
detached garage on .65 acre of land in the Very-Low Residential Distdct, located at 5270
Smokey Mountain Place ®APN: 1074-141-08.
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report, noting a modified condition of approval
which reads: "Approval of this request does not waive or override the requirement of the property
owner to adhere to there quirements set forth in any CC&R's applicable to this property."
Brad uller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
David Garcia, 5270 Smokey Mountain Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the CC&R's state a
restriction upon the construction of second dwelling units,
Mr. Buller indicated that he had not seen a copy of any CC&R's for his property, but if there are the
applicant would have to address it as a private matter between themselves and the Homeowners
association; The City can not enforce or regulate them.
Mr. Garcia asked how this issue would affect his project,
Mr. Buller replied that today's action carries a 10-day appeal period. Following the appeal period,
he would be free to apply for permits but that the burden of complying with any CC&R restrictions
would be a private matter.
Mr. Buller explained that he had visited the site and asked why the roof on the garage is asphalt
shingle as opposed to the used on the main dwelling.
r. Garcia stated the garage was built 8-9 years ago and that the roof was in good shapes and
therefore would not be replaced at this time,;
rBuller closed the public hearing.
r. Buller then stated the second dwelling unit is well situated and does not impact the keeping of
horses for any of their neighbors:
r. Buller asked if the second dwelling unit is intended for family use.
Mrs. Jessica Garcia, 5270 Smokey Mountain place, stated it is for her parents.
Mr. Buller noted that if the structure was new construction, the City would require a the roof to
match the main dwelling, but because it is existing it could remain. Mr. Buller asked the applicant`
to consider a new the roof.
r Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 99- 1 with the modified condition:
C. CONDITIONAL UBB PERMIT99 18-WILLIAM AND BERNADETTE Lei N!l A -A request
to construct a 900 square font second dwelling unit on a 20,000 square foot lot in the Very-
Low Residential District, looted at 9573 Sunflower Street -A : 1062-251-12.
Donald granger; Planning Technician, presented the staff report noting a letter had been received
on November 15, 1999, from Wayne McVay, 599 Klusman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. Mr
c ay's letter is in opposition to the project and indicates his belief the project would be in violation
of CC&R's in place on the projects;property. M'r. Granger indicated the City Attorney has been
contacted and that a 2 week continuance is requested to allow time to research the issues and allow
the applicant time to address the issues:
Brad Buller, City Planner, noted that the parking requirements and distance requirements for the
keeping of horses has been met. Mr. Buller asked if their were concerns other than the issue of
the CCR"s.
Donald Granger stated the project meets all of the requirements and noted that the applicant has
been diligent in cooperating with .staffs requests.
r. Buller noted he had visited the site and that the applicant has done a fine fob in locating the
second dwelling unit in such a way as to cause minimal visual distraction for the neighbors.
Mr.. Buller then opened the public hearing`.
Mike Dunn; P.O. Box 661, Aguanga, CA, the agent for the applicants stated the applicants have
lived in the main dwelling for over 10 years and that it is his understanding that the second dwelling
unit is for his parents, and that at some point in time, it may also be used for her parents. He noted
he is a responsible, award winning contractor and that he designed the new unit. He stated the
applicants could not be present because of their work commitments in Los Angeles., r. Dunn
further stated that he was aware of CCU "s on the property but that he was not aware of an
enforcing body (homeowner's association).
City Planner Minutes 3 November 23, 1999
Sandy Beep, 9598 Sunflower Street, rancho Cucamonga, asked that if the second dwelling unit
is for family, must it remain for the use by family only. She added that she had herd the Duncan'
were planning to use the unit as a rental.
r. Buller replied that the State says second dwelling units mint be allowed as a matter of right to
the homeowner, but that they do not dictate as to who may live in the unit. He continued by acting
the State also gives the City the task of determining where in the City is the best place for these
types of units and that they allow the City to have reasonable conditions to help ensure the use is
compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, He explained that these units fit into two categories,
the first being a west house,which does not have cooking facilities and the second being a second
dwelling unit which allows for independant living with a cooking or kitchen facility. He added that
the City does net have the right to dictate who lives in the unit.
Gary Kolar, 5977 Klusman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is in opposition to the project
noting that if it is strictly for family, then he would not be in opposition. He noted the pride of the
neighborhood and indicated that rental property would not be appropriate. He added that low®`
density is why most of the owners purchased property in that neighborhood.
Mr. Buller noted that we have second dwelling units in many exclusive neighborhoods in the City
and that it does not seem to affect them.
<I
r. Kolar indicated he seemed to recall &R's but did not recall receiving a letter of notification
from the City. He added that if the current owners sell their home, that it could open the
neighborhood to "transient society.'"
Donald Granger showed the neap to Mr. 'Kolar,;indicating the a-foot radius for mailing notices.
r. granger said Mr. Kolar's property was just outside of the notification area:
Elizabeth Strasser, 6006 Klusman.Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, said she could supply a copy of
the &R's. She continued by expressing her concern over a previous neighbor who rented out
their home resulting in many cars. She stated that they bought in the neighborhood because they
like the space between their homes.
r. Buller stated he had noticed a number of extensive room additions and large balconies that had
been added throughout the neighborhood which also infringe on the space between the homes,
Mrs. Strasser noted that Mr. McVay previously had a two story garage and later tare it down. The
new garage now has are upper room that is a workshop, but he has made it look like someone lives
there with curtains in the window.
Bill Evans, 5925 Klusman, Rancho Cucamonga, noted his disappointment that the applicant did not
come to the meeting to address the questions of the neighbors„ such as whether the applicants '
have children, and why are the parents not invited to stay in the main house? Mr. Evans concluded
that he is opposed to the project.
r. Buller commented that typically as people get older they may want some level of independence
and at the same time be close to their children, but not under the same roof
r. Evans asked what part of the applicant's lot the second dwelling unit is planned to be built on.
Donald Granger indicated on the diagrams the location of the unit in relation to the main dwelling
and the surrounding property lines-
r. Kolar asked if the City can stipulate how the second unit is to be used and for whom.
City Planner Minutes 4 November 23, 1999
Mr. Buller indicated that we may not be legally able to do that.
Mr. Kolar reiterated the concerns regarding the CC&R's and asked if an amendment could be made
to them if the only enforcement available is through the CC�'R's,
Vern Evans, 5933 Klusman, Rancho Cucamonga,asked if by allowing the second dwelling unit and
the possibility of it eventually becoming a rental, if that in fact is actually changing the zoning of the
neighborhood to R-2 property. Mr. Evans concluded that he is opposed to the project for that
reason.
Mr. Buller replied by explaining the State has a different view when it comes to second dwelling
units.
Mr. Evans stated he thought it would be Wright for the in-laws, or for a "Granny-unit," but that this
plan opens the door down the road for R-2 property.
Mr. Buller noted that the issue of second dwelling units, is a State issue and that cities have not
been energetic in embracing the idea. He continued by saying the City has to say"yes"to second
dwelling units somewhere, and the challenge is the find where they fit the best. He added that a
900 square foot unit fits better on a larger lot than a smaller one and that it is within the 25 percent
lot coverage maximum allowed by the Development Code,
Mr. Buller then decided to continue the item to December 7, 1999, to allow time to have the City
Attorney review the CC&R's, and time for the applicant to further address the concerns with their
neighbors.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There was no further public comment at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:55 pm.
Sincerely,
Lois=chr'ader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner .Minutes 5 November 23, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
November g, 199
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
q Planner to order at 2;00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at ;
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Gran James,
Senior Civil Engineer, Lois Schrader, Secretary.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that he would hear items A and B concurrently because the
uses are similar, are proposed by the same applicant, and both projects are located in the Masi
Plaza,;
MINUTES
Minutes for October 2 , 1191 ,were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A® CONDITIONAL NAL USE PERMIT gg- FOSTER CO UNICATI N - A request to
establish'a retail store of phone and communication equipment in a leased space of 730
square feet within Building 5 of the Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park[district (Subarea 7) of
the Industrial Area Specific plan, located at 11837 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 229-011-39.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report for both items, A and B.
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT gg-o - VISTA FAINT- A request to establish a speciality
home improvement retail store in a leased space of 5,300 square feet within Building 13 of
the Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park[district(Subarea )of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit E m APN: 229-0117.
Brad Buller, City Planner asked the applicant if he had read and agreed to the conditions of
approval.
Mike Scandiffio, Masi Commerce Partners, 11871 Foothill Boulevard, stated that he was familiar
with the standard conditions and that they were acceptable;
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing.
City Planner Minutes 1 November 9, 1999
'« • � *' * � � �d I � ran � �, -� � � �#
N i• !
commented that the hours of operation are tight but that during the early morning hours,the facility
would need to be sensitive to the neighbors. Mr, Buller emphasized that because there is a-
Conditional Use Kermit if there are any complaints about the noise levels, there would be another
hearing to reviews the compatibility of the use with the neighborhood. He added that the State has
given the City stria guidelines as to what we can and cannot do to these uses: Mr, Buller also
noted that during his visit he observed the garage is being used as a playroom He continued by
saying that in the City°s Development Code,the purpose of a garage is to park cars and is not a play
area. Mr. Buller added that the garage is to be used for parking so that the driveway is clear for
the drop off and pick up of the children and that other interior spaces in the house are to be used
for the play area as well as outdoors. Mr. Buller emphatically stated that he is not approving the
permit with the idea that the garage will be used as a play area and that this would be in violation
of the City codes: He continued by stating he was ready to approve the daycare with the interior
of the house and the yard being used for the care of the children, but not the garage as an interior
playroom,
Ms. Smith asked if it was raining or cold,could the children use the garage for play. She noted that
it is her understanding that the State says she can not house the children in the garage, but that she
can use the garage for a play area if they can not go outside and that the garage door could be
raised,
stated that has approval will stipulate that the only a rovle la areas are in the house
Buller st p r. y pp y
pp p
and the yard. If you use your garage on occasion, it may be between you and the State but he
speculated that this issue could come back to him as a neighborhood concern. He noted that the
garage was clear enough that the car could be pulled in.
Ms. Smith asked if his concern was in regard to her parking the car in the garage in the evening
or if he just did not want there (the children) in the garage.
Mr. Buller stated that his concern is not whether she parks her car'in the garage at night but that
the garage not be the designated or required indoor play area for this use.
Twila Kerr, 1 781 Webb Ct. Fontana, asked if she had to park in the garage at all times or if
because the children are being dropped off in the driveway she should park in the street.
Mr. Buller said that was not the issue. Because there is a garage and the applicant could use her
garage and not the driveway during the hours of drop-off, that the driveway needs to remain open
for drop-off and pick,-up and that whether she chooses to park in the garage or on the street during ;
that time is her choice, but the City can not condone the use of the garage as a play area.
Elizabeth Priscaro, 9850 19th Street, 4 Alta Loma, asked if the garage is converted by sealing
up the door so that it could not be raised, drywall installed, carpeted, heated etc. to the point where
it could not be used for parking, would the use then be approved as a playroom.
Mr, Buller responded no.
Elizabeth Priscaro then asked how other people get those garage conversions or add-ons
approved:
Mr. Buller noted for the record that we had received a total of 3 letters in opposition of the use, the
final letter received today and that if he had known Mr. Jenkins had concerns, he would'have shade
another attempt to visit hies during his site check today. He reported that the letters specifically cite;
the neighbors concerns of noise,traffic issues, and a small outside play area. He also commented' ;
that during his visit he noted the children obviously love being cared for by Ms. Smith and he did
have the opportunity to speak with one of the neighbors, Bar. Ward.
City planner Minutes 3 November 9, 1999
Delores Nettles emphasized that although the daycare would be permitted for up to 14 children, she
clarified that this does not mean 14 children living in the residence, but that they are there on
various days at various times, some infants, some toddlers. Ms. Nettles also noted that many of
the issues could have been directly addressed with the applicant if the neighbors would have been
willing to talk to them prior to the hearing specifically noting the issue of traffic: i.e. often 3 or more
children may be dropped off in one vehicle, eliminating the possibility of as many as 6 cars.
Ora Smith noted that she could have continued to operate with up to 24 children per day with her
license fore children without anyone's approval. She asked if she left things the way they are,
without the Conditional Use Permit, could she continue to use her garage.
Mr. Buller indicated that City codes only allow the garage for parking.
Ora Smith continued to say that the only reason she has pursued the expansion of the daycare is
because she serves as a backup for another daycare person and may, at times, have 14 children.
She continued by saying that because she's bringing in children with the desire to help, she is
receiving negative feedback. She indicated that with the limit of 8 she can do whatever she wants
to as long as she was within the State guidelines.
Mr. Buller concurred that the Large Family Daycare opens the door for this type of discretionary
review.
Hearing nothing further, Mr, Buller closed the public hearing,
Mr. Buller summarized by saying staff has recommended approval with conditions and that he
would like to add a condition that states upon the signing up of a child, the dayeare operator will
present to the parent the policy about how Io drop-off and pick-up their children and that they are
not to use the neighbors driveways, He indicated that he still believes it is a reasonable protected
use for the neighborhood and that it can be a good neighbor and that a lot will depend upon the
applicant's management and the parents.
Mr. Buller approved Conditional Use Permit 99-02 by adoption of the Resolution with modified
conditions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No additional comments were made at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2.45 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Hearing 4 November 9, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
October 26, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF_PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner-, Dan James, Sr, Civil Engineer; Doug Fenn,
Associate Planner; Rudy Zeledon,Assistant Planner; Donald Granger,
Planning Technician; Lois Schrader, Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
_MINUTES
September 21, 1999 minutes were approved.
P_QBLIQ HEARINGS
I_I E PERMIT 99-44 - DAVES - A request to continue interim use of vehicle
A. COND TONAL US storage
tora eon 1.4
acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area
Specific
pec 9 ed at 9449 on Boulevard -032-28 and 29.
fcPan' oc t er -APN: 209
1 1 1 located F
Doug Fenn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report noting that the applicant was not present, but
had been given notification:of the;meeting by mail and by phone and did not indicate his intentions
to attend or not to attend the meeting.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr. Buller, asked Mr. Fenn if he had any specific observations about the project.
Doug Fenn presented a recent photograph taken of the perimeter of the subject property noting
that the chain link fence surrounding the property is heavily covered with a living, vine type plant,
which effectively screens the vehicle storage area from view.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and hearing nothing further, approved Conditional Use Permit
99-44 by adoption of the Resolution with conditions.
KCC IDITIt IIAL USE PERMIT 99-38 - THE WORD IN MOTION EXPRESSIVP ART
AC&DEMY-A request to establish an arts/dance academy in a leased space of 8,571 square
feet within an existing church facility totaling 30,000 square feet in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 4)of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9592 7th Street-APB]: 209-171-43.
----------
Donald Granger, Planning Technician, gave the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
r. Buller, asked the applicant how long she had been teaching dance,
Ms. Anne Dunn, 2415 Mercedes Avenue, Highland CAR stated she has been teaching at the
Cucamonga Christian Fellowship for 7 years as a ministry, but that she has over 15, years
experience teaching dance:
Mr. Buller asked what elements make her dance classes different from other studios.
Ms Dunn replied that she teaches the students journaling skills, note taking, leadership and
teamwork and related terminology as well as dance.
Mr. Buller asked if she and her students travel and perform.
Ms. Dunn stated that they do in cooperation with other leaders and dance studios.
Mr. Buller asked the general ages of the students,
Ms. Dunn=noted that the students range in age from 3 years to seniors and that she even has are
o year old tap dancer.
r Buller asked if the seniors group is growing.
s. Dunn said that it i .
r. Buller asked if the applicant had read the conditions of approval and if they are acceptable.
s. Dunn stated she had and that the conditions are acceptable;
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and remarked that he has visited the church facility in the past
and has seen other functions there and that he feels assured the church is in fact a goad neighbor
and that the dance school will be an asset to the church and a positive Influence to the community.
Mr._ Buller then approved Conditional ►Use Permit 99-38 by adoption of the Resolution with
conditions.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MIT gg- 1- ASAE TOWING - A request to establish an interim use
of vehicle storage/impound on 2 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9495 gth Street-APN 09-032-22and 24
Rudy Zeledon,Assistant Planner, presented the staff report rioting the approval Is for a time period
of two years with the option of three, one-year extensions.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr. Buller asked the applicant if he had any comments on the report.
Mr. Chuck Buquet, of Charles Joseph associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, rancho Cucamonga,
indicated he represents the applicant and stated he is in concurrence with the report. 1,
City Planner Minutes 2 October 26, 1
m
i
r. Buller asked,Mr. Buquet if he knew of the tenant's plans for the lot surface material and
perimeter fencing.
r, Buquet stated that the lot will be surfaced with crushed aggregate and the fencing will be chain
link with either slats or screening. Mr. Buquet noted that the aggregate has already been delivered
to the site and that they have filed a landscaping plan. Mr. Buquet added that the crushed
aggregate is being used on the portion of the site for the storage/impound area of the site.
r. Buller asked how the gate on the north side of the property would be managed and where
would the customers park.
r. Buquet indicated the customers typically would be without a car and most likely would be
dropped off, but in the event they drive to the location, parking is available at the front area near the
office and that the customers will actually have to go to the office for access.,
Mr. Buller asked about the access to the storage area itself.
Mr. Buquet explained that the storage area will be fenced, gated, and locked at all times and that
access is restricted particularly since the vehicles stored there will be law enforcement vehicles,
fleet vehicles used by ASAP Towing, and privately owned vehicles that are there for body work.
Mr. Buller asked if the impound vehicles mould have to be stored with a different level of security
than the other vehicles.
Mr. Buquet indicated they did not, but that they are planning to add security lights to the building
that will illuminate the storage area and they plan to install security cameras;
Mr, Buller confirmed that there would be no barbed wire of any kind:
Mr. Buquet stated that was absolutely the understanding and that it is noted as a condition of
approval.
Mr. Buller asked if there would be a guard dog:
Mr. Buquet indicated he did not know but that security is important and that was why having no
access from Feron Boulevard is important to them. Mr. Buquet also referred to a business plan that
had been filed b the applicant which notes a mobile security service for this operation.
Mr, Buller recalled the desire of the applicant for a full, 5 year approval, but noted that the
Commission is more comfortable with the 2 year approval and that it would be monitored.
Mr, Buquet expressed his feeling that there was some confusion about that issue with some of the
Commissioners and that perhaps they did not understand but that it was important to note that the
applicants have made a substantial financial investment into the property and that it would be
disappointing if it is only a 2 year time period but that he has explained to the applicant that this is
an issue of compliance and that following the conditions and doing what they say they will do will
be important when applying for the extensions.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and hearing nothing further approved Conditional Use permit
99- 1.
PUBLIC COMMENT
No other comments were made at this time,
City Planner Minutes 3 October 2 , 1999
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m.
Sincerely,
Dols J. Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 4 October 26, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
September 21, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRE-SENT Brad Buller, City Planner; than James, Sr. Civil Engineer, Doug Fenn,
Associate Planner, Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner, Emily Wimer,
Assistant Planner,Warren Morelion,Assistant Planner,Donald Granger,
Planning Technician, Lisa Kuschel, Planning Aide.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
_MINUTES
Minutes for August 10, 1999 were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. )ITIONAL USE PERMIT END TIME PROPHETIC MINISTRIES -A request
to establish a church in 5, 225 square feet of leased space within the Deer Creek Village
Plaza in the General Commercial District,located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard -APN: 1077-401-29.
Donald Granger, Planning Technician, presented the staff report. He noted that no calls or
correspondence had been received regarding the proposed Conditonal Use Permit 99-27,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
James Miller, Pastor of End Time Prophetic Ministries, 10572 Acacia Street, Suite C-1, Rancho
Cucamonga, asserted that although new to the City, he had been made aware of the rules and
guidelines regarding the Conditional Use Permit, and that they would abide by the rules.
Mr. Buller noted that the church is considered an "invited neighbor" in the retail shopping center,
and that the applicant should be aware that the uses in the center may vary, and that the center
may become busier with the retail uses allowed there resulting in conflict. Mr. Buller continued by
advising the applicant to be sure to go through the process should they expand their hours or have
a need for additional space, Mr. Buller expressed strongly his desire for the church to follow the
rules regarding signage,taking into consideration the Sign, Ordinance as well as the sign program
already established for the retail center.
Edmund Hloshy , Manager and Landlord, 7900 haven Avenue, Suite 25, Rancho Cucamonga,
stated he has a hands-on" approach to leasing his properties, noting that he takes great care to
amend his leases with a violation policy, and that he will be sure the applicants will follow the rules
in his center.
r. Buller voiced his appreciation for property managers that support City regulations. He also
noted that the City is very supportive of churches and explained that it is a challenge to find suitable;
places for churches to Locate in the City, and as In this case„ the church becomes a "'west and
therefore must be mindful to be a good neighbor to the various businesses around them._
r. Buller then closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller concluded his remarks by indicating he has visited the site and was very familiar with the
activities that take place in the center. He supported the applicant by wishing theta success in their
new location.
r. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 99-27 by adoption of the resolution.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT gg- g - AMERICAN , TORES ,AND LEWIS OPERATING
CORP. - A request to allow a Type 21 ABC license permitting the sale of beer, wine and
distilled spirits for off-site consumption within a previously approved 14,841 square-foot av-
can drug store within the Terra Vista`Gown Center, in the Community Commercial District of
the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and
Town Center Drive -API: 10171 1-1 ; Related File: Conditional Use Permit 11-2
Donald ganger„ Planning Technician, gave the staff report.
Grad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Eric lull,Watson Group Inc., 1820 East First Street,Santa Ana, representing av-On as the Project
Manager, stated they had reviewed all the requirements and agreed to abide and operate
accordingly. Mr. Hull also noted the staff report gave an accurate summary of the proposed permit
and distributed to Mr. Brad Buller,City Planner and Lois Schrader,Secretary, a copy of the policies
av-On holds in regard to cigarette and alcohol sales. He noted their special training for cashiers
and explained that "shopper decoys" are sent into the stores toobserve and report if the cashier
is following the policy as well as an additional safeguard that has been installed on the cash
registers which essentially shuts down the register unless a birth date is entered during the sale of
cigarettes or alcohol. Mr. Hull also noted that disciplinary measures are taken if a cashier is caught
breaking the rules:
Mr. Buller commended Bav-tin for their policies and training. Mr. Buller then closed the public
hearing:
r. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 99-39 by adoption of the resolution;
C. __ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-45 -W HI_ INVESTMENT CC PANY INC. -A request
to establish a title company in 44,219 square feet of leased space within an industrial
building, in the General Industrial District, Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan
City planner Minutes 2 September 21, 1999
located at 9220 Cleveland Avenue, Building " APN: 209-411-28 209-411-29 and
2 -411- 0. Related file: D -1' .
Warren M relion, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, presented a memorandum, noting a request to add a
condition to the resolution stating " A signed consent and waiver form, to join and/ear form the
appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fled with the City Engineer prior to issuance
of building permits." Mr. James noted that the cost to the applicant is about $1,000 per year and
that it only applied to parcel 29.
Mr. Buller asked if the applicant had been made aware of this requirement:
Ms. Carol Plowman, Leo&Associates, 3535 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, stated she was not
aware of the additional requirement but did not feel it would be a major issue. She indicated she
had been told the fees had been taken care of at the time of the sale of the building and asked why
it applied to only one parcel and not all threes
Mr. James explained that because the request before the City Planner was only for one parcel, the
requirement will only be conditioned for that parcel. Mr. James also added that the LIVID is for
lighting maintenance, not installation;
Ms. Plowman complimented the staff and Mr. Buller on their hard work and efforts to streamline
the process. She then asked what would happen in the event this specific tenant did not move into
the space, but another tenant elected to take the space:
Mr. Buller responded by explaining that if the use is similar to or in the same category as what is
already approved for the space (Administrative Office designation), then a different tenant could
move into;the space without a new application. Mr. Buller used the example of one location
receiving approval to serve the public as a fast food restaurant: Should that tenant move out,
another fast food restaurant could move in, but if the use is different or occupies a different space,
the business would have to apply and go through the Conditional Use Permit process.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing:
F
f resolution.Conditional Use Permit 99 adoption o the eso ut'+an.
Mr. Buller then approved o n
y P pp
1 . C N®ITI NJ <tJ E PERMIT 99-09 - J®E. SHEA CO., INC. -A request to locate a mobile
home as a caretaker's residence within a general contractor's storage yard on . 9 acres of
land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Flan,
located at 13208 Whittram Avenue-API -. 229-191-12. Related file CUP 9 -05,
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner presented the staff report and noted that the applicant could not
be present for the meeting, but that he had reviewed all the conditions with the applicant and that
the applicant indicated agreement to the conditions as presented. Mr. Zeledon also noted the
applicant has submitted a plancheck for the project improvements
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing:
City Planner Minutes 3 September 21, 1999
Mr. Buller stated that he would allow the applicant due process and the opportunity to complete the
conditions required, and if the applicant failed to do so, Code Enforcement would be kept informed,
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 19-09 by adoption of the
resolution.
0 * * * * i
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 4 September 21, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER INUTE
NO MEETING TE T, 999
CITY CIF RANCHO
CITY PLANNER MINUTES'
NO MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1999
'I
I
j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
August 10, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2-00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10,500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Donald Granger, Planning Aide; Lois
Schrader, Planning Division Secretary,
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
MINUTES
July 13, 1999 Minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-14 - MARK AND KIMBERLY PANGLER - A request to
construct a 948 square foot second dwelling unit on a 39,900 square foot lot in the Very-Low
Residential District(less than 2 dwelling units per acre),located at 5528 Morning Star Drive-
APN: 1074-401-05.(Continued from July 13, 1999)
Donald Granger, Planning Aide, presented the staff report noting that the only challenge received
regarding the proposed project was in regard to, the location of the seconnd dwelling unit in
proximity to the neighbors' horse stalls. He said that since the initial meeting on July 13, the
applicant has since relocated the second dwelling unit in the north west direction on the property,
placing the unit more to the center of the property. He reported that he had received verbally
communicated with Mr. Kelly and Mr. Scott, but had tried to contact Mr, Rambreck, but did not
receive a return call. He indicated that none of the neighbors objected to the idea of having a
second dwelling unit in their neighborhood, but that the primary issue was the location and its close
proximity to the horses. He explained that by moving the unit to the new position on the property,
the concerns of the neighbors were satisfied because the it would now be more than the required
70 feet away from their horse stalls,thereby protecting their interests as owners of"horse property,"
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant was present,
Eleanor Ford, 4965 Independence Street, Chino, introduced herself as the mother-in-law of Mark
Spangler, the applicant,
Mr. Buller asked if she had spoken to any of the neighbors personally
Ms. Ford explained that she had not,but that her son-in-law had kept her informed of the neighbors'
concerns noting that they were not even aware that one of the neighbors kept horses and that they
did try to resolve the issue themselves by asking one neighbor to move his horse stable to a
different location onhis property. She reported that the neighbor was not in favor of that idea. She
reiterated Mr. Granger's comment that the neighbor's issue was not over the second dwelling unit,
but its effect on their ability to beep horses.
Hearing no further comments or questions, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing",
r. Buller then expressed his appreciation for the «angler's patience during the process and
noted that he was sure they had learned a lot about the process and that he was pleased they had
come to this point, He noted that all projects are carefully reviewed to insure that what we allow one
property owner to do on their own;property does not impact the surrounding property owners
negatively. He affirmed their willingness to work with staff in resolving the issues and wished there
well;
r. Buller then approved Conditional Use permit 99-1 by adoption of the resolution_.
RUBLIC COMMENTS
o comments were made at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
lyfEl'wJT
The City planner meeting adjourned at :10 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City planner Minutes 2 August 10, 1999
Awk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD JULY 27, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
July 13, 1999
Brad Buffer, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p,m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner- Dan James, Senior Civil Engineec Rudy
Zeleclon, Assistant Planner; Donald Granger, Planning Aide, Lois
Schrader, Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made at this time,
* * . k *
MINUTES
June 8, 1999 minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A; CONDITIONA US,EPERMIT 99-24 - CALVARY CHAPEL-A request to establish a church
in a leased space of 29,746 square feet within an existing building totaling 144,216 square
feet within the Rancho Technology Center in the General Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9650 Ninth Street, Suite A-APN: 209-021-17 and 5,
The staff report was presented by Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner.
Brad Buller, City Planner, noted for the record that a typographical error had been made in the
resolution for this item and was shown on page A-10. The resolution indicated Building and Safety
conditions as the heading above the Engineering conditions, A corrected resolution had already
been given to the applicant prior to the meeting,
Jim Orate, representing Calvary Chapel, asked if the Engineering requirements shown in the
resolution were entirely his responsibility or if they were to be handled by both he and the owner of
the property. He specifically expressed concern over the Engineering condition requiring the
installation of a curvilinear sidewalk.
Dan James noted that the same conditions had been given to Bassett at the time of their approval
and that a staff member had been assigned to follow-up on that issue to generate the appropriate
enforcement letters to resolve the issue of their noncompliance with the conditions.
Mr. Orate offered to get with the owner and work something out and to discuss Bassett's joint
responsibility,
City Planner Minutes 1 July 13, 1999
Mr, Buller remarked that the property owner was present at the time the Conditional Use Permit for
Bassett was approved and that he too was aware of the conditions at that time.
Mr. Buller asked Mr eledon if he had visited the site during the evening hours two evaluate the
lighting for the safety of those attending evening meetings,.
r. Zeledon indicated that he had, and that the night lighting appeared to be good,
rBuller then opened the public hearing.
Tearing;no comments from the public„ Mr. Buller closed the public hearing
Mr. Buller commented that he was glad to seethe church expanding and that he was aware they
had been looking for a site for some time. He pointed out how sometimes its good to see the
answer to their space issues was right "in their backyard," He noted that in this case, the church
is considered the guest in an area that is primarily zoned for manufacturing uses. He continued by
stating that as long as Bassett is a quiet neighbor„ there would be no problem with the church being
there but that they should be cautioned that if there are complaints about manufacturing noise
during meetings or worship„that the church would have to keep in rind that they are the guest and
those kinds of situations are a tough call, and likely to result in support of the manufacturing use.
r Buffer then approved Conditional Use Permit 99- 4 mating the correction on the Resolution of
Approval'.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99.14 - MARK AND l IMBERL ` SPAN LER - A request to
construct a 94 square foot second dwelling unit on a 39,900 square foot lot in the Very Low
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5528 Morning Star Drive-
APN, 107 -4g1-0o
Bract Buller, City Planner" noted that the applicant was not present and that during the course o
evaluating this 'project, several letters of concern regarding the impact of the proposed Second
Dwelling;'Unit and the ability to keep horses were received from the neighbors adjacent to the
Spangler's property. Mr. Buller eked if the applicant would be present. He noted that several
letters received were in regard to the impact of the proximity of the proposed Second Dwelling Unit
to the horse stables on the adjacent properties. He added that because of the raised concerns, the
applicant has requested a continuance to the August 10 meeting so that they can explore other'
options
Donald Granger„ Planning,Aide, confirmed that the applicant was not going to be present and that
the applicant had not withdrawn their proposal. Several letters received were in regard to the
impact of the proximity of the proposed Second Dwelling Unit to the horse stables on the adjacent
properties. He added that because of the raised concerns„ the applicant has requested a
continuance to the August 10 muting sea that they can explore other captions and be in town to
attend the meeting as well,
Mr, Buller carefully explained for the benefit of those attending the meeting, that if they were
unable to attend the meeting on August 10 and they wished to speak can this project, that they could
o so at this time and that their comments would be entered into the record, or if they wished, they
could wait until the August 10 meeting to express their views when the applicant was present„ but
that with the concerns that had been raised in mind, he explained that he would have great difficulty
supporting the project at this time and that it would not be acted upon until the August 10 meeting
and his direction was to continue the item as requested by the applicant. He also pointed out that
City Planner Minutes 2 July 13, 1999
the applicant was exploring all options„ but that for the benefit of those who wished to speak today,
the public hearing would be opened and would remain open until August 10. he also noted that if
they were not familiar with the application, that staff would be happy to offer further explanation
within the context of the hearing.
Mr. Buller then opened the public hearing,
' erbon Kelley, residing at 10746 hillside Road, presented a diagram indicating the property in
question and the adjacent properties. The drawing noted the locations of the horses and stable on
one property and the empty stables on his property as well as that of his neighbors, he stated he
had lived on the property for the past 1 -years and that he did not currently own a horse, but that
he was looking for one, he pointed out the Spangler's wanted to build the Second Dwelling Unit
in what is now their riding area. he noted that the Second Dwelling Unit should be 70 feet from the
boarding of the horse. he reported that the Spanglers had asked hire if he would move his stable
and that he had answered "no" to the request. He noted that they have plenty of property and
therefore have other captions and that he felt it was not their right to change things at the "eleventh;
hour," He expressed his concern that the Spangler°s should plan their own property but they do not
have the right to plan his:
Mr. Buller reassured Mr. Kelley that this was all part of the process and that this was why we give
the neighbors the opportunity to come and express their views on the project and that he
appreciated his comments and invited both he and Mr. Fernandez to tally with the staff or himself
regarding the Development Code restrictions regarding Second jewelling units and the process,
Karim Fernandes, residing at 10802 hillside Road,asked if there were other Second Dowelling Units
in the Deer Creek area that have been approved and how large of a unit is allowed and if there is
a difference between a guest house and a Second Dwelling Unit.
Mr. Buller pointed out that the Development Code has specific requirements for Second Dwelling
Units, Mr. Buller advised them that the City had accepted the State„s challenge to allow Second'
Dwelling Units as a possibility. he pointed out that the lawn did not require us to allow therm
anywhere and that not everyone likes having them in their neighborhood. he noted that fw"+lr, Kelley
had brought out an important point in the process being that the proposed project would place a
restriction on someone else's property if the Guest douse was allowed to be built as proposed.
Another provision of the Development Code states that you can not stable a horse within 70 feet
of an adjoining property's dwelling. It does not distinguish between a main dwelling or a second
dowelling or guest house. I've heard your concerns and your interest and now we need to note your
attendance and the issues you have in the record,
Mr. Fernandes then explained that he had found out that there was a previous application for a
Second Dwelling Unit on his own property ert filed b a previous owner, but that it was denied,
n h
, g p p y y p " ed� e
asked why and what regulations applieda
r. Buller
B suggested that staff research that for him.
Mr- Kelley and Mr, Fernandes both requested copies of the letters from the neighbors.
Mr, Buller indicated that they were part of the public record and that we would provide therm with
copies.
a
-i
Mr: Buller then moved to allow the public hearing to remain open and to continue Conditional Use
Permit 99-1 to the August 10 meeting,
City planner Minutes 3 July 1 „ 1999
PUBLIC 'lME T
There were no additional comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2*30 p.m.
Sincerely,
Is r
la ivision dr tar r
City Planner Minutes 4 July 13, 1999
.................
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD JUNE 22, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
June 8, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2,00 p,m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center,,10500 Civic` enter Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, pity Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Dance
Sebring, Planning Aide, Marren Morenl€on, Planning Aide, Lois
Schrader, Planning Secretary:
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
MINUTES
May 25, 1999, minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99- - COMPASS BREED RESTAURANT AND BREWERY" w A
request to serve alcoholic beverages within an outdoor patio area, approximately 458 square feet
in conjunction with a restaurant and bar in the Masi Plaza, located at 11837 Foothill Boulevard on
the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west' of Rochester Avenue - A,PN: 9-911- 9,
t arice Sebring, Manning Aide,presented the staff report. She reported that no communication was
received from the neighboring tenants regarding the proposed Conditional Use Permit.
Brad Buller, City Planner, noted for the benefit of the ;public that the owner of the property, Mike
Scandiffip, was ran the phone and had asked to be conferenced into the meeting:
Jim Connell, the applicant stated that the staff report summed up the proposed use well, and that
he was satisfied that the use was what they had planned,
Mike Scandiffio., representing the Blasi Commerce Partners, stated his concern over the phone
regarding the serving of alcohol on the patio, and that he was requesting an additional condition to
the resolution requiring a written agreement between himself and the applicant or that the CUP be
considered null and void upon written notice of the property owner.
Mr. Buller explained that the City would only consider revoking a Conditional Use Permit if
violations of the stated conditions occured and that process safeguards everyone, but that it
requires written notification and a public hearing, and that the City would not act on a revocation
simply based upon a dispute between the tenant and the owner. Conflicts with the use and
surrounding uses., or a violation of a condition of approval could be grounds for revocation.
Mr. Buller asked if the owner had signed the application,
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner stated that the application had not been signed by the owner, only the
applicant.
Mr. Connell stated that he had a verbal agreement with Mr. Scandiffio several weeks ago,
Ms, Fong suggested the resolution be revised requiring a letter from the owner to the City indicating
the owner's approval of the use prior to the commencement of serving alcohol on the patio,
Mr, Buller asked Mr. Connell if he would be willing to accept this added condition requiring a letter
from the owner,
Mr. Connell stated that he would.
Mr. Buller then closed the public hearing.
Mr, Buller emphasized to Mr. Connell the condition requiring him to follow the stated sign program
and that particular attention was to be paid to the use of neon. He also noted that several
communications had been received from the Planning Commission regarding the neon signs
currently in use by the applicant, and that Code Enforcement had been contacted regarding the
violations, He then concluded that the resolution was to be modified, adding the condition requiring
a letter from the owner granting authorization to the applicant, for the use of serving alcohol on the
patio, and that the letter would have to be received by the City prior to the commencement of the
use. He then approved Conditional Use Permit 99-33,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2-25 p.m,
Sincerely,
ois Sc a er
Planning Division Secretary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 25, 1999
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Planner
to order at 2:00 p.m, The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at the
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner, Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist, Warren
Morelion, Planning Aide, Lois Schrader, Secretary, Dance Sebring,
Planning Aide
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
MINUTES
Minutes of May 11, 1999 were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1, CONDITIONAL USE PERM[r 99-21 -W�jLTQN-A request to establish a church within 3,600
square feet of leased space in a multi-tenant industrial center located in Subarea 3 of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan at 9390 Seventh Street, Suite, "D"-APN- 209-171-57.
Warren Morelion, Planning Aide, presented the staff report,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing,
Mr. John Walton, 9390 Seventh Street, representing the Christian Chapel. He emphasized that he
was very pleased with the work that Warren Morelion had put into their report and that it represents
exactly how they intend to operate the church facility,
Mr. Buller explained that the City holds a friendly position towards churches and that they are
considered welcome neighbors in any district, He pointed out that the key to establishing a church
in an industrial area is for them to operate during the"off-hours"of the primary adjacent businesses.
He emphasized his hope that in the future they would in fact, grow and find a permanent location
somewhere in the City. He stressed the importance off llowing the sign Ordinance and that no off-
site directional signs are permitted, He encouraged the Waltons to be sure to work with Building
and Fire Safety as they made their tenant improvements.
Hearing no questions or comments, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing,
Mr. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 99-21 as recommended by staff with the attached
Resolution of Approval and Conditions.
City Planner Minutes 1 May"25, 1999
E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT gg- -SCHULFER-A request to establish a retail custom silk
plant arrangement business within an existing workshop of 336 squire feet on an existing
historic property- The loch House -within the Lowy-Medium Density Residential District ( -0
dwelling units per acre), located on approximately 1.5 acres of land at 7491 Etiwanda Avenue-
A N: 100-0 1-01
Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist gave the staff report. She noted that only one inquiry to the
application had been received from the public. She explained that a neighboring home owner had
asked several years ago to establish a commercial business on his property which would have
required a re-zoning, and the City had denied his request. The homeowner wanted to know why
we mould approve this application and not his. Ms. Morris explained to him that no zoning changes
were being made and the differing circumstances of the two applications, The neighbor understood
the explanation and was, not in opposition to this application,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr, and Mrs, Ronald Schulfer, 6123 Cabrillo Court, offered his hearty thanks to Cathy Morris and
Larry Henderson for their work on their behalf. He asserted their desire to preserve local history
and he also noted that the location of their business on the property felt compatible with the area
surrounding the property.
r. Buller asked what is most attractive to them about the property;
Mr, Schulfer replied that the location is beautiful, they love the history and style of the house.
Mr. Buller asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on the issue,
Mr. Mike Robbins, 7076 Etiwanda avenue, representing the Myohoji Temple voiced his strong
support of the application on behalf of the temple; He noted that he was the founding director of the
Etiwanda Historical Society and that he had known the previous owner of the Koch House:
Hearing no further comments, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing,
r. Huller noted that Mr. Robbins has been part of many hearings, diligently supporting the
preservation of historical sites in Etiwanda He continued by saying Mr. Robbins has done much
to carry on the ideas of the ity's forefathers in preserving the local history': Mr. Huller added that
he was glad to have are opportunity to see a business established on the property noting that the
care and upkeep of such properties are expensive and that perhaps the business could help defray
some of the coasts of owning the property, and that he offers his strong support. He reminded there
that this approval was unusual because it precedes the approval of the related Landmark
Designation 99-01 as well as the Dills Act Agreement 00T01 and therefore the;approval of their
application is contingent upon these related approvals by the City Council.
Mr. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 90- with the attached Resolution of Approval
and Conditions,contingent upon the subsequent approval of Landmark Designation 99-01 and Mills
Act Agreement 99-01
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Robbins remarked that he would be in attendance at the City Council meeting to offer his
support on their behalf for the Landmark Designation 99-01 and the Mills Act Agreement 00-01.
City planner Minutes 2 May 25, 1999
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 3 May 25, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO GA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1996
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;City
Planner to order at .66 p,m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 16666 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, ;Principal Planner, Chan
Names, Senior Civil Engineer, Fancy Fong, Senior Planner, Darice
Sebring, Planning Aide„ Rudy Zeledon, Associate Planner, Cathy
Morris, Planning Specialist, Darice Sebring, Planning Aide.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
MINUTES
Minutes for March g, 1699, and April 27, 1999 were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 69-16 - CHURCH CP THE LIVING GOD- A request to
establish a church in a leased space of 1,488 square feet in an existing building totaling
17,689 square feet within the Arrow Business Center,in the Industrial Park District(Subarea
7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 6461 White Oak,Avenue, Suite 166-APN:
6- 51-6 . 61 67-76.
Rudy Zeledon, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
it
Mr. Zeledon noted that no complaints or responses were received to his mailed notification of the
public hearing
Mr, Buller noted that he had read the staff report and had visited the site and then he asked the
applicant if there had been any indication from the management company of the property as to their
favor or opposition to the church operating there; considering the history of the churches already
located on the property.
r. Earl Singletary, the pastor of the Church of the Living Cod, indicated the management company
was, in favor of the church locating there.
Mr. Buller asked if there were any other comments or questions from anyone in regard to the
project.
Mr. Singletary mentioned that on the letter accompanying their application,they had stated Sunday
services lasted until 1: 1 p.m but that at tunes it might extend until 2.-30 p.m.
Mr. Buller responded by stating staff could revise the resolution to indicate an ending time on
Sunday's to : 9 p.m, to accommodate the applicant.
Mr. Buller then reminded the applicant to work closely with the Building and Safety and Fire Safety
Departments as they made their improvements. He also admonished there to follow the ity's Sign
Ordinance and not to use illegal signs;
Mr. Buller asked the applicant where they were located prior to rancho Cucamonga,
r. Singletary said they were originally from Los Angeles, but that their congregation consisted of
people in the local area,
Hearing no further comments or questions, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved
Conditional Use Permit 99-16 with the modified Resolution of Approval and Conditions.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-2 -HARNEY-A request to operate a commercial stable
for 9 horses on o acres of land in the Very-Low Residential District located at 5727
Carnelian Street-API : 1062-041-24 Sebring, Planning Aide, presented the staff report,
Lean James noted that Engineering was deleting their requirement for the public right-of-way nested
on page Bu11.
Brad Buller City Planner, commented on how trails have had a big part of the local history of our
area; be then thanked Mr, blarney for his diligence in working with the City over the years to
establish and maintain the trails system,
Mr. Buller then opened the public hearing.
r, Prichard Harney,the applicant, stated the lights around his horse arena had been installed prior
the ity's incorporation. be then asked what the regulations are now for this type of lighting and
if the lights had to be shielded:
Mr. Buller responded that he'could work with Ms. Sebring and that she could guide him on the
exact requirements, but that in general, the height of the poles would have to be reduced and in
addition, the light fixtures would have to be shielded to reduce glare on the neighboring properties.
He explained that the same regulations apply to those homeowners having tennis courts, and that
the idea is to be sensitive to the neighbors by blocking off the stream of light at the property line.
He continued by stating that the City is asking the-lights'be retrofitted to the current requirements.
Mn Harney responded by stating that would not be a problem.
Mr. Buller continued by mentioning that hearses have a sensitivity to shadows and that they can be
"spooked" if the lighting is not correct and therefore it is important to protect the rider with the right
type of lighting. Mr. Buller also observed that no complaints or comments had been received from
the applicant's neighbors and therefore he could assume that he had been a good neighbor for the
City Planner Minutes 2 May 11, 1999
many years he has been on the property. Mr. _Buller asked what the ultimate goal was for the
property:
Mr. Harney explained that he was selling the property and that these improvements would snake
the property more marketable. He then asked if there was a deadline for correcting the lighting and
what type of screening was required
Mr Buller noted that a deadline had net been given but that we would establish one and that he
could work with Ms. Sebring on that issue. He also explained that the screening needed was
basically a piece of shut metal that acts as a shield around the edges of the light fixture so that the
lighting is limited to a specific area:
Hearing no further comments or questions, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing. Mr. -Buller then
approved Conditional Use Permit gg- 0 with the attached Resolution of Approval and modified
Conditions;
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99- r MASI COMMERCE PARTNERS - A request to
establish a fitness center in a leased spade of 42,000 square feet within the Masi Plaza, i
the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -A 229-011-4 and 61.
CONDITIONAL QSB PERMIT gg- - MASI COMMERCE PARTNERS - A request to
establish a beauty salon in a leased space of 4,500 square feet within the Masi Plaza, in the
Industrial Park District(Subarea of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the southwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APNW 2 9-01l- g:
a
Mr. ' Buller noted the time as :EIS p.m. and that the applicant was not in attendance. He then
observed that for expediency's sake,the items could be acted upon without Mr, Masi in attendance
and that they could be handled together. Mr. Buller then asked Ms, Sebring if there were any
comments;, changes or revisions to her report.
s, -Sebring responded there were not.
.I
r. Buller then approved Conditional Use permits 9 - 2 and 99-23 as recommended by Staff with
the attached Resolutions of Approval and Conditions. ;
PUBLIC CQ-MMENTS
Where were no comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at : g p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
City Planner Minutes 3 May 11, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 27, 1999
Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Acting City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division
Conference Room at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Larry J. Henderson, Acting City Planner-, Jeanenne Spikes, Acting
Secretary; Alan Warren, Associate Planner,
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
No action taken.
,PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. HAYWOOD - A request to
establish a church within 3,070 square feet of]eased space in a multi-tenant industrial center,
located in Subarea 3 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 9330 Seventh Street, Suite "G" -
APN: 209-171-57.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Larry Henderson, Acting City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr.Warren commented that one person, Mr. Bud Watson from Watson Precision, called inquiring
about the possibility of the church operating a day care or nursery school. Mr. Watson's primary
concern was compliance with Federal regulations regarding his business of manufacturing
ammunition being located next to a school/day care use. Mr.Warren informed him that the church
does not intend to have a daycare or nursery school at this time,although if in the future they apply
for a permit for a day care or nursery school, the City would research the matter,
John Melchor, Architect, 6779 Treeline Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the applicant
agrees to the conditions and plans to file for a building permit within the next few days.
Mr. Henderson cautioned the applicant that there is a specific condition regarding signage in the
Resolution. He explained that A-frame and sandwich board signs are not allowed, even on the
weekends.
Mr, Henderson closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 98-12.
allBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments,
ADJOURNMENT
The City planner meeting adjourned at 2-06 p.m.
Sincerely,
anenne; pike
Acting Secretary
City Planner Meeting 2 April 27, 1999
CITY;OF HO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER INUTE
NO MEETING HELD iL 1 , 999
i
'ii
CITE`'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD A 3, 1999
a
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
March 9, 1999
Brad Buller,City Planner,called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Planner
to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at the
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Darice Sebring,
Planning Technician, Lois Schrader, Planning Division Secretary.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made.
MINUTES
February 23, 1999 minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PER S-A
request to establish a retail carpet store in a leased space of 3000 square feet within
Building 14 of the Masi Plaza in the Industdal Park District (Subarea 7) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-48.
Darice Sebring, Planning Technician, presented the staff report.
Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr. Buller stated that he had read the staff report and asked Ms. Sebring if she had any corrections
and/or additions to the report.
Ms. Sebring indicated there were no changes to the report.
Mr. Buller asked if the applicant was already in business.
Ms. Sebring said that the applicant was currently occupying the building.
Mr. Buller stated he had no further questions regarding the report but continued by asking if the
applicant had been contacted since he was not present at the meeting.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner responded by saying the applicant had been called and that she spoke
directly with Jack Masi,who during the call said he and Mr. Mike Scandiff io would be in attendance.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller then approved CUP 99-05 as recommended by staff with h the attached conditions and
Resolution.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments t this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting djourn d at : 0 p.m.
Sincerely
"044---
Lois Schrader
Planning ivi i n Secretary
City Planner Meeting March 9, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 23, 1999
Brad Butler, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, Lois Schrader,
Planning Division Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made.
MINUTES
January 12, 1999 minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-02-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS-
A request to establish a drycleaning business in a leased space of 2,085 square feet
within Building 13 of Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the
Industrial Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue -APN:229-011-13.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner presented the staff report.
Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Mr. Buller stated that he had read the staff report and had no further comment or questions in
regard to the report. He then asked if the applicant had any questions.
Mr. it Scandiffio, of`Masi Commerce Partners, stated he had no questions,
Mr. Buller then approved CUP 99-02 as presented and recommended by staff with the Resolution
of Approval and the attached Conditions of Approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:05p.m.
Sincerely,
J.
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 2 February 23, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 9, °1
i
CITY OF RANCHONt
CITE` PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD CIA ' JAR ` 2 , 1999
CITY OF RANCHOMON
CITY PLANNER MINUTE
Regular Meeting
January 12, 1999
Brad Buller City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2M p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Poona at
the Rancho~Cucamonga Civic tenter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner, Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner, Lois
Schrader; Planning Division Secretary
NN D�Q l I rtENT
There were no announcements
MINUTES
December 8, 1998 minutes were approved
6 * M * #
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CONDITIONAL AL USE PERMIT 9 - 9 - PRE Cl 31ON GYMNASTICS -A request to
establish a gymnastics school in a leased space of 19,000 square feet within an
existing industrial building in the General Industrial District (Subarea of the 1
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9518 'Ninth Street - AP 1. 09-0 1- 9. .
Related file: CUP 93-4 .
Cecilia Williams,Associate Planner, presented the staff report, Ms, Williams noted a change in the
staff report which indicated the student population should read 110 students participating at any
time rather than 75 stand in the report, and that the change made a difference in the panting
spaces required. She noted that using the original numbers shown in the staff report, 35 spaces
would be required„ but with the increase, 91 spaces will be required. She also pointed out that the
Resolution of Approval had been revised and that it now included conditions from the Fire
Department and that the applicant and all arose attending the meeting had been given copies of
the revised resolution,
r. Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
City Planner Meeting January 12, 1999
r. Buller stated he had read the staff report and had visited the site, He asked if there was a
possibility of any prospective tenants interested in the remaining ""remnant" of space left in the
building
Ms, Williams answered that the owners, 1. ,O., had indicated there were no prospective tenants
t this time:
Mr. Art Mory, stated he was 1 of 7 co-owners of precision Gymnastics and that it is a family owned
business, and that 5 of the 7 co-owners are Rancho Cucamonga residents, He remarked that he
appreciated the support of the City and that they were Teased they could continue to operate in
Rancho Cucamonga. He stated that there is a separate entrance to the building area for trucks
located at the southwest corner of the property and that this entrance can be utilized by incoming
trucks so as to bypass any pedestrians in the parking lot. He noted that there is other truck activity
in the far-end of the development" and that they had actually observed the trucks to monitor their
traffic flow patterns. Mr. Mory also indicated that they had already applied for permits for
improvements for the entrances,egress,and the like and that it is their intention to fully comply with
the City"s requirements,
Mr. Buller asked how luny people he anticipated to gather outside of the building, ie, parents
waiting for students or students waiting for rides.
Mr. Mory replied that he did not expect much activity outside of the building, that parents will drop
off or pick up children and the likelihood of loitering outside will be minimal because they have
provided an expanded viewing room for parents and visitors and that most people will choose to
wait inside the building:
Mr, Buller asked if the location of the "Dance Studio" indicated on the plans was by design or if
there was a specific reason it had been placed directly adjacent to the neighboring tenants" wall,
r, Mory responded that it was a matter of convenience, that the room had already been framed
in as an office area.
Mr. huller commented that he was glad to hear the neighboring tenant was in support of his
operating there because some noise and vibration could occur and that is why this type of use is
handled as a Conditional Use hermit, so that it can be addressed if it should become a problem.
Mr. Buller stressed that he hoped the noise issues could' be worked out between them as
neighbors.
Mr, Mory replied that the style of dame is primarily gymnastic and that not much music is involved.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing.
r. Buller then congratulated Mr. Mory on their successful partnership and their expansion and
expressed his hope that at some time in the future their continued growth would warrant their need
to occupy the "remnant" space.
1
Mr. Mory indicated that the owners of the property was happy because they had not been able to
lease the space for sometime;
City planner Meeting 2 January 12, 199
Mr. Buller then approved CUP 98-29 with the conditions as presented and with the revised
Resolution of Approval including the conditions provided by the Fire Department,
No public comments were rnede.
ADJOURNMENT
i
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m
Sincerely, ,
Leis Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 3 January 1 „ 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNERMINUTES
NO MEETING L 22, 1998
CITE` OF RANCHOU AMO GA
CITE' PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
December 8, 1998
;
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at :99 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic tenter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, Lois
Schrader, Planning Division Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements at this time
MINUTES
November 24, 1998 minutes were approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
X CON DITI ONAt USE PERMIT 98- 8-PR SSER-A request to allow the retail sale
of used automobiles in an approximately 1,042 square foot leased space within an
existing multi-tenant industrial complex on 9.15 acres of land in the Industrial Perk
District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the northeast
corner of Arrow Route and White teak Avenue at 8429 White Oak Avenue, Suite
196-APN 9 - - 1,
Sal Salazar, Associate Manner, presented the star report,
Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner; opened the public hearing
Mr, Buller stated that he had read the staff report and had visited the site: He also commented
that he had been aware of two other auto sales companies in town that have run similar types of
operations in the past but was not sure if they were still in business; He continued by asking the
applicant if he had any questions to ask:
Don Prosser, the applicant, stated that his letter was clear in that he would not be displaying
vehicles outside of the building, that he world be using advertising to draw his clients and that it
was only a part-tune business; a hobby for extra income
Mr. Buller asked if he thought this type of car sales was a trend in the industry,
Mr. Prosser indicated he had no personal knowledge of others doing business this way. He only
knew of the other related businesses in his complex, He mentioned that the business would have
a low overhead. He explained that some do it in a retail'fashion, others wholesale and according
City Planner Meeting December 8, 199
to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the only real requirement as far as facilities is a display area,
He noted that even specially marked parking places could satisfy the requirement for a display
area. He continued by stating he liked the idea of warehousing the vehicles inside the building -
because it would be safe and secure, He mentioned that two related businesses are currently
located in adjacent suites: Performance Suspension, and Charles Loose Precision Machining. He
also pointed out that the DMV will visit his business to assure his compliance with their regulations,
r, Buller closed the public hearing.
r, Buller offered his best wishes to Mr. Prosser and noted that the business should be a,
compatible neighbor, He concluded by pointing out that the Planning Commission had a concern
with a similar business in the past because the owner began allowing several vehicles for sale to
be parked outside of the building but indicated that as long as the vehicles for sale were housed
inside the building, as per the conditions, there would not be a problem, Mr. Buller approved CLIP
98-28 with the conditions as recommended by staff.
r. Prosser asked about how quickly the plan check from Building and Safety could be completed
as well as what fees are required for licensing.
i
r. Salazar stated that he would contact Mr. Brock of our Building and Safety Division on behalf
of Mr. Prosser at the conclusion of the meeting and that Dawn Sates from Business Licensing j
could explain his licensing foes.
i
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were made,
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2,25 p.m
Sincerely;
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City planner Meeting 2 December 8, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTE
Regular Meeting
November 24, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the Dity of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at -00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller,City Planner;Rudy Zeledon,Assistant Planner,Sal Salazar,
i
Associate Planner, Lois Schrader, Secretary, Dart James, Senior
Engineer..
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements
MINUTE
October 27, 1998 minutes were approved'
PUBLIC HEARING
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88- 4 - ABUNDANT LILTING FAMILY CHURCH A
request to expand an existing church from 8„870 square feet to18,880 square feat
in a ]eased space within an existing multi-tenant industrial complex on 5.75 acres of
land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plaid, located at the northeast corner of Sixth and Utica-APN: 09- 11-17 elated
file CUP 87- 8:
Rudy Zeledon,Assistant Planner, gave the staff report. In addition to his report, Mr. Zeledon noted
the condition from the Engineering Department which prohibits parking on both sides of Utica
Avenue. Mr. Zeledon also stated that he,had performed a telephone survey of the neighboring
businesses and had confirmed that none of the existing tenants were operational on Sundays, and
that Gene's Grinders was open on Saturdays from 8; a.m. - 12:010;p.m.
Mr, Brad Buller, City Planner, asked if we had received any complaints or notifications regarding
code violation issues with regard to the applicant.
Mr. Zeledon responded that none were received.
Mr. Buller asked Mr, Zeledon if in the course of his survey if any of the neighboring businesses had
any questions or concerns regarding the expansion of the church and if the persons being surveyed
were fully aware of who was calling and why.
Mr, Zeledon answered that the neighboring tenants understood why he was calling and no issues
or concerns were raised regarding the church expansion, Mr eledon added that he had pulled
copies of all the business licenses of the neighboring tenants to verify their days and hours of
operation.
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing.
Mr. Diego Mesa, Pastor of the Abundant Living Family Church gave a short history of the church's
ministry noting their advertising on Mark's Cable and their outreach ministries to the community,
He explained that their goal was to blend with the community, and that they were not aware of any
negative comments about their ministry. He added that the church has tried to be sensitive to the
other tenants and noted that the trophy shop and Gene's Grinders are located on the opposite side
of the building and therefore are not impacted by any parking issues. He commented that the
church attendees never park on Utica but that Coca Cola employees park on Utica on a regular
basis. He stated that he has never addressed this issue with Coca Cola,
Mr. Buller asked when the church began,
Mr. Mesa answered by saying the church had begun in 1995 as a "home church" in Fontana and
then the group moved to a school site and from there to their present location. He noted that their
congregation numbers over 1,000 members and they are hoping to purchase their own site and/or
building within the next 5 years. He mentioned that they currently have a 3 year lease with 2-1 year
lease options added.
Mr. Buller commented that it is a pleasure to hear about their growth, He further explained that the
City is supportive to, churches and that the Abundant Living Family Church as a "starter" church is
the largest we have in a Multi-Tenant Industrial Business Park. Mr, Buller continued by stressing
the importance of being a good neighbor and since he had not received any negative
communication from the owner of the property, he could assume their efforts in being a good
neighbor is working. Mr. Buller noted the importance of maintaining those relationships and to
remember that they are a guest in an area that is intended for industrial purposes, Mr. Buller then
asked if all the activities of the church are held indoors including mid - week programs, youth
ministries, and if activities for children occur in the parking lot.
Mr. Diego responded by saying that with the exception of a table in the plaza area used for a sign
in area, all activities are held inside the building.
Mr. Buller asked if what age groups would be part of the mid-week, evening activity,
Mr. Diego said that all age groups participate in the mid-week services,
Mr. Buller asked if it was about the same as on Sunday.
Mr. Diego indicated that it was about 1/4 the number of people that would normally attend on
Sunday,
Mr. Buller commented that he had made a visit to the site and noted several vans and a bus parked
in front of the building. He continued by asking Mr. Diego for more information about the vehicles,
Mr. Diego explained that the vehicles are used for the church ministry and that they consist of a 66
passenger bus, 2 vans, a purple"grumin"van and a"bubble"bus, He continued by highlighting the
outreach ministries that included their"adoption"of the children of Lytle Creek whereby the kids are
picked up,fed and ministered to. The purple bus was being used for an"after school"program that
has since been tabled for review.
Mr. Buller asked where the busses and vans are normally parked,
Mr. Diego stated that typically the vans are parked in an easement area. The vans generally stay
in front, the purple van and bus are parked behind the building with the owner's permission,
Mr, Bullerasked if they intended to expand the bus ministry,
Mr. Diego said that he could not honestly say that he would not and that it most likely would expand
in the future.
r. Buller noted that the site is tight for parking and that there is a condition which prohibits parking
on 8th Street and on Utica. He continued by saying the bus was net behind the building on the day
of his visit and that it occupies 3-4 parking spaces in the lot.
Mr. Diego;responded by promising to keep the busses where the City would like to have them and
that normally they are behind the building. He added that they have a rental space at 7th and Utica;
and if necessary, could be used for parking the ministry vehicles.
r. Buller closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller indicated his excitement about their growth and expressed his hope that they would fund
a permanent location. He pointed out that if the owner either has an existing tenant or any new
tenants that want to operate on Sundays that parking could be a problem and that under those
circumstances the Conditional Use Permit would have to be reviewed. He continued by indicating
to Mr. Zeledon that he wanted to add an additional condition to the resolution that would require
the church:vehicles to be parked behind the building and that if the parking needs increased these
vehicles would have to parked off the site entirely. He also added that he felt the lighting at night
was sufficient but that more lighting would be better and that if more lighting was warranted, the
church would acquire the proper permits for the installation. Mr. Buller continued by stressing the
importance of following the sign laws and that many churches do not adhere to the sign ordinances.
He acknowledged the difficulty for churches in an industrial area to "be seen" and for people to
know where they are, especially if the facility is located in the rear of an industrial park. 'Mr. Buller
asserted his concern over the growing problem of posted, illegal signs and stressed the City°s pride
in maintaining a quality appearance and expressed his desire for their cooperation in this area. Mr.
Buller concluded by noting conditions in regard to fire safety and then approved Conditional Use
Permit 98- 4 with the additional condition mated.
B, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98- 7 - VINEYARD HRI TIAN FELLOWSHIP A
request to operate an approximately 9,789 square foot church within a multi-tenant
industrial complex on 0.62 acres of land located in the Industrial bark (Subarea 6)of
the Industrial Area Specific Flan, located on the north side of Trademark Street,west
of Haven Avenue, at 1 410 Trademark Street -AP I; -8 t- 4
Mr. Sal Salazar"Associate Planner,gave the staff report. He rioted that #8 in the Planning Division
conditions needed correction. The word "northwesterly" should read "northeasterly". He also
added that Life Point, an adjacent tenant to the church, gave a written agreement to the church in
regard to parking.
Mr, Buller opened the public hearing.
Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he had made an evening visit but then asked Mr. Salazar it
he had seen the level of activity on Sunday;
r. Larry Mc Garity,the applicant responded by stating that there was no activity from neighboring
businesses on sunays and that all of the neighboring tenants seemed favorable to the expansion.
He added that due to the extent of the guarantee needed from the city, written agreements
regarding parking were not procured'from the tenants other than Life Point, the adjacent tenant.
Mr. Buller quipped by saying perhaps his church should grown and move into Mr. Diego's facility.
He then asked where they had been meeting prior to this location.
Mr, McGarity said that they had been meeting at the Hilton but that the church actually started in
a home in Manchu Cucamonga and that they had moved to a facility in south Ontario from there.
He noted the costs of that facility as well as their desire to financially prepare for a permanent facility
prompted the last move and their decision to downsi e;
Mr, Bullerthen noted that parking is a critical issue and that one letter had been received from Mr.
cheu, the owner of the facility across the street.. He noted Mr. cheu's concern over the limited
parking and his fear that the church would be using his parking area. He asked Mr, Mc Garity if
any communication had occurred between himself and Mr. Bcheu;'
Mr. Mc Canty stated that there had not been anything between them and that parking had not been
discussed, nor had they tried to secure agreements with the businesses across the street,that they
had focused on the tenants on their side of the street:
i
Mr. Buller stressed the importance of being a good neighbor and that some extra effort would be
needed in this case because the parking is particularly tight. Mr. Buller also noted cleanliness and
upkeep as important issues. Mr. Buller remarked that the lighting seemed sufficient, but suggested
that if there were dark areas, he would prefer more light than less.
r. Buller then asked if there were any church busses or vans,
r. Mc Cavity responded that there were not.
r, Buller closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller then stressed the importance of following the sign laws and that many churches do not
adhere to the sign ordinances, He acknowledged the difficulty for churches in an industrial area to
"be seen" and for people to know where they are, especially iff the facility is located in the rear of
an industrial park. Mr. Buller asserted his concern over the growing problem of posted, illegal signs
and stressed the City"s pride in maintaining a quality appearance and expressed his desire for their
cooperation in this area.: He suggested the church be clever with their publications and handouts
and that they could inquire as to whether their building would be allowed to have a monument sign.
Mr. Buller concluded by approving Conditional Use Permit 98-27; with the conditions and as
recommended by;staff.
UBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were made;
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m.
Sincerely;
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD NOV EMBER 10, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
October 27, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2,05 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buffer, City Planner; Rudy Zeleclon, Assistant Planner; Cecilia
Williams, Associate Planner: Lois Schrader, Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements
MINUTES
September 8, 1998 minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-21 -ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP-A
request to establish a church in a leased space of 2,898 square feet within an
existing multi-tenant industrial park on 5.22 acres of land in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 1) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 856,0 Vineyard
Avenue, Suites 308, 309, and 310 - APN- 207-262-49
The staff report was presented by Rudy Zeleclon, Assistant Planner,
Brad Butler, City Planner asked if the applicant was in attendance and if he had any comments or
questions in regard to the report,
Mr. Al Lopez introduced himself as the Senior Pastor of Alta Loma Christian Fellowship and stated
that he had nothing to add,
Mr. Buller asked if the all of the members of the public attending the meeting were in support of the
project being presented or if there were any in attendance that were in opposition.
Everyone present indicated that they had come as supporters of the project and were members of
the Alta Loma Christian Fellowship.
Mr. Buller commented that Rancho Cucamonga as a city has been historically supportive of
churches finding their home in our community but that churches are not treated differently from
other types of applicants or businesses moving into the city. He noted that this particular fellowship
had moved from several locations and that they he was glad they had decided to stay in Rancho
City Planner Meeting 1 October 27, 1998
Cucamonga. He commented on the importance of being a good neighbor particularly in the area
of sign violations. He pointed out that their location is situated near the rear of an industrial park and
that their visibility from the street is limited. He challenged the applicant to not be in violation of the
sign ordinance even though we have seen other church groups use sandwich signs and othertypes
of illegal signs to gain visibility. He encouraged there to come talk to us about their signage plane
and to allow the City to assist therm as they grow. Mr, Buller also mentioned that although are
industrial park is often the .starting paint for many church groups, he is aware that they would hope
for their own building and property at some point in the future, and when that time comes, to allow
the 'City to be a resource to them. Mr. Buller stated that he was approving CUP 98- 1 with the
conditions as recommended by Staff.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98- - SAUTER - A request to establish a custom
metal fabrication facility in a leased space of 4,235 square'feet within an existing
industrial building on 2 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and
Helms Avenue. AFT: 99-021- 8
The staff report was given by Cecilia Williams,Associate Manner. She added a letter received from
David and Gail Moore, 9449 Ninth Street, property owners south of the proposed project. The letter
asked the City Planner to address the issues of hours of operation, traffic., parking, noise and trash
in their absence since they would be unable to attend the meeting
Mr, Buller, City Planner, commented that he had visited the current location of the applicant and
asked if there was going to be significant changes in equipment.
r. Russ Sauter,the applicant, stated that there would not be any loud machinery, only some noise
from hammers,
Mr. Buller, asked where on the plans the parking would be located and if there would be any
fencing. He also asked Ms. Williams if a plan for parking and storing had been submitted.
Ms. Williams said she had not seen a plan yet.
r. Sauter indicated on the drawing that parking would be located on the perimeter of the property
and that there was a total of 30 spaces but that the owner was planning on allowing about 8 spaces
for his employees and customers:
Mr. Buller asked what the indicated fencing was for:
Mr. Sauter replied that itwas to split the property.
Mr. Buller asked what would go on the interior side of the fence.
Mr. Sauter stated that It was intended for employee parking, that they were accustomed to parking
within a fenced area.
r. Buller commented that he had visited the applicant's current location and asked if all facets of
the business would be conducted within the interior of the building at the new location and if he was
planning to store material„ machinery, trailers or other equipment outside.
r, Sauter replied that everything is moved indoors at might.
Mr, Buller asked Ms. Williams if he (the applicant) had spoken to her about outdoor storage,
City Planner Meeting 2 October 27, 1998
Ms. Williams stated that the applicant had not mentioned storage:outside of the building,
Mr. Buller explained that all storage must be screened from public vier and that no material or
equipment of any kind could be stored outside, if storage is indicated there it must be approved and
fall within the City's specifications which would be a block wall, not a chain link fence with wood
.slats. He further state that the panting lot plan, striping and any fencing would be subject to review
and approval by the City planner. Mr. Buller suggested Mr. Sauter encourage the owner of the
property to look at the entire frontage of Ninth Street as he continues to expand in the future and
that with expansion, consider improving the property with landscaping and street improvements.
Mr. Sauter commented that coulee be his plan.
Mr. Buller noted that the areas around the property are being upgraded and that perhaps in the
future the existing chain link fencing could be removed and with his metal working skills could
fashion something more attractive: He adders that at this time he was not requiring improvements
since the applicant was not significantly increasing his square footage from the old location
Mr. Sauter asked about acceptable signage and if he could use larger numbers on the building than
the current numbers which he estimated to be approximately 2 inches tall:
Mr. Buller suggested he talk to Ms, Williams about the sign guidelines, but that the numbers could
definitely be larger particularly for the benefit of firemen and other emergency services. But that
signs on walls of industrial buildings were acceptable within the guidelines.
Mr. Sauter added that signs would not be a significant issue since most of his clients are repeat
customers and that walk-in traffic is limited,
Mr. Buller approved CUP 9 -22 with an added condition requiring the submission of a parking lot
plan and fence location which will be subject to approval by the City planner.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The City planner meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m,
Sincerely,
�,�F /"/
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
AUL
City Planner Meeting 3 October 27, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD OCTOBER 1 , 199
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING L T22, 1998'
i
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
September 8, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner, an Coleman, Principal Planner; Rudy
Zeledon,Associate Planner; Lois Schrader,Planning Division Secretary.
&NNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
August 25, 1998 minutes were approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A, CQNDITIONAL U5E PERMIT 98-19 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA KARATE INSTITUTE-
A request to establish a 7,000 square foot health club and karate studio within the Central
Park Plaza in the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan,
located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road-APN: 227-182-06
and 10.
Brad Buller, City Planner asked if there were any additions to the staff report.
Rudy Zeledon, Associate Planner, said that the only additional item of interest was that there are
2 pads that have not been built yet, and therefore the applicant will have temporary access to
additional parking.
Mr. Buller, asked if the applicant was present and if the applicant was aware of the conditions
required of him and the direction of the report,
Mr. Zeledon, responded that the applicant was not present, but that he had been notified of the
meeting. He added that the applicant was not aware of the conditions or the direction of the to
report.
Mr. Buller noted Condition#6 and asked how the notification of special events would work,
Mr. Zeledon said the applicant would be required to provide a program of any special events,
tournaments or shows for review by the Planning Department prior to the event for the purpose of
ensuring their compatible operation with the other businesses within the center, noting the time
parameters, the number of people expected to attend and any additional promotional signs to b
used.
. Buller suggested that a one week time frame be specifically stated for the applicant to notify
the Planning Department of such events.
r. Zeledon agreed that one week prior to the planned event would be a good idea;
r. Buller stated that the remaining conditions were acceptable and that with the minor modification
to Condition , he was approving Conditional Use Permit g -t .
PUBLIC COMMENTS
&D_JOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:07 p.m.
Sincerely,
Luis Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
}
City Planner Meeting 2 September 8, 1998
CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular meeting
August 25, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at :00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive„ Rancho Cucamonga, California.
TAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Rebecca"fan Buren,Associate Planner, Lois
Schrader, Planning Division Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
MINUTES
August 11 1998 minutes were approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-16-DECKER-A request to use a temporary removable structure for
a second dweiling unit for the sole occupancy of two adults over 66 years in age, directly related to the
family which-owns and resides in the primary residence on a 19,665 square foot parcel in the Low
Residential [district( -4 dwelling units per acre)„ located at 7420 Scott Lane APN1 077-071-014
Rebecca `wean Buren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report:
Brad Puller, City Planner, asked if a neighborhood meeting was held and if there had been any
correspondence received from the neighbors:
s.. Van Buren explained that no meeting was held and no calls or letters were received in
response to the notices that were posted and mailed. She indicated that one neighbor was present
in response to the mailing.
Mr. Buller explained that the standard condition was to notify anyone within 300 feet of the
proposed project:and that we have a reap designating the neighbors that were notified.
r. Buller opened the public hearing.
Mr. Lee Leonardo explained that this was strictly a care issue for the elderly family members and
that there was no intention of using the proposed structure for increasing their property value,
Mr. , Muller verified with Ms. Checker and Mr. Leonardo that they had read and understood the
resolution and its conditions and they both acknowledged that they did,
Amok
Mr. Rubin Ramos, 7429 Ivy Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he was representing himself
and his father who is the co-owner of the property adjacent to the Decker property on the west side.
Mr. Buller asked which property was his specifically, (pointing to the drawing) and asked if he was
the neighbor with all the trailers,
r. Ramos responded that the neighbor he was referring to has a tin barn and a small house as
well as all the trailers. He also stated that there is a trailer attached to a truck on his property that
belongs to his renters which he has asked the owners to remove. Mr. Ramos continued by
emphasizing his support for the proposal of the temporary mobile home but that he was concerned
about the large Eucalyptus trees on the north side of the applicant's property. He stated he would
be more comfortable if the mobile home could be moved further away from the west and north
boundary in the event of a tree falling down. He recalled a tree failing on their garage last year
requiring the roof to be rebuilt:
Sharon Decker, the applicant, responded by saying the garage was closer to the north border than
the proposed site of the mobile home.
r. Buller thanked Mr. Ramos for coming to the meeting and redirected his remarks to the
applicant. He commended the applicant for trying to bring her parents closer to them and that this
decision was a difficult one because of the City's position in not encouraging modular units, or
mobile hordes in an established, single family neighborhood, He continued by explaining that after
visiting the neighborhood for the first time, he realized that this was not a typical neighborhood and
that his greatest hesitancy at this point was the fact that he would be approving something he has;
not seem i.e.the mobile home itself. He pointed out that there is a condition requiring the applicant
to add features such as a patio structure, to make it more architecturally compatible with the
neighborhood but that the difficult issue is determining the standard to use. He stated he would
apply the same standard used in any other neighborhood and perhaps he would even up the
standard.
Ms. Decker and Mr, Leonardo assured the City Planner that the mobile home would be very nice
and that the elderly couple had been accustomed to a comfortable lifestyle and that they would not
choose anything less. Ms. Decker noted that she was looking at a brand new mobile home that
is blue and white:
Mr. Leonardo said he was looking at a mobile home that was custom built in 1982 Or 1983.
Mr. Ramos asked if they would have to be hooked up to a septic tank.
Mr. Duller informed then that they would have to meet the requirements of the Building
Department. Mr. Buller asked if Building and Safety had made any comments
Ms. Van wren indicated that Building and Safety had not made any comments but that they are
aware the house is on a septic system and noted that they have a hearing scheduled for August 28,
1998, and that their staff was recommending approval,
Mr. Buller noted that he was going to revise the proposed resolution specifically on Condition 3 to
include features to enhance the elevations both in color and design with the intent of being
compatible with the existing home and property.
City Planner Meeting 4 august 25, 1998
Mr, Leonard asked if they purchased a new mobile home if that wouid suffice,
Mr. Buller stated that he did not know without seeing it and that is why he was asking for compatible
features with the existing structure such as color, similar architectural features, or trellis work if
needed,
Mr, Buller said he would like a statement noting that the unit would be consistent in architectural
color and compatible elements of architecture to match the existing house, Mr. Buller noted that
he was concerned about how Condition#5 was written in regard to the length of time that would be
reasonable for the removal of the mobile home following the passing of the elderly occupants, He
continued by saying that he did not feel he would be emotionally ready to handle that type of family
business so soon after a death in the family. He continued by saying he would increase the time
period for removal to 90 days. He emphasized the point that he did not want to have to be dealing
with its removal via a code enforcement action. He also remarked that he would not add or make
a new condition to move the proposed location of the mobile home further from the trees, but that
he would not oppose moving it further to the south. He indicated on the map that to move it 15-30
feet south would be acceptable but that a 60-70 foot tree could easily fall where it will but that
trimming the trees was a good idea. He asked if the Mustang (car) would be removed,
its, Decker responded that it would.
With that summation, Mr. Buller approved CUP 98-16 with the modifications noted; the extension
to 90 days for the removal of the mobile home and the approval of the structure's color and design,
He reiterated his hope that when the time came for the removal of the mobile home that he would
not be attending a revocation hearing and that he was trusting them to be a good neighbor and take
care of it appropriately.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2.-25 p.m.
Sincerely,
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 4 :August 25, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
August 11, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2;07 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Lois Schrader, Secretary', Brad Buller, City Planner; Rudy ZeIedon,
Assistant Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements
MINUTES
May 26, 1998, minutes were approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-14 - GODDARD - A request to establish a retail/wholesale
furniture business in a leased space of 9,871 square feet within an existing industrial building
on 75 acres-of land in Subarea 17 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northeast
corner of Center Avenue and Regis court, APN: 1077-401-37, Related file: CUP 95-21
Rudy Zeleclon, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing and asked if there were other businesses in
the park and if so, what types of businesses were there.
Rudy Zeledon stated that the park was occupied by light industrial businesses.
Henry Reiter, the builder/developer of the park indicated that there were 9 buildings in the park, He
stated the current tenants were comprised of a party equipment rental, a industrial lighting supplier,
and a machinery manufacturer/retailer, He also indicated a mortgage company was considering
one of the vacancies as a future location,
Douglas Goddard, the applicant, said they were pleased with the new site due to its added
exposure, additional windows, and the fact that they would no longer need a forklift, They felt the
smaller square footage would be acceptable and that they planned to stack some of their
merchandise.
Brad Buller asked if the fire codes and building codes had been satisfied in regard to the stacking
of the merchandise.
Henry Leiter indicated that the code allowed there to stack as high as 12 feet and that they should
have no problem with the limit, He also mentioned that the tenant could actually have up to 30
spaces for parking if necessary.
Douglas Goddard said that the report and the agenda reflect the space as leased, but that in
actuality, the building is;a purchase:
Brad Buller commented on his support to the owners and the niche that they have found in servicing
our growing community with their wholesale/retail style of operation. He also noted that he was in
favor of their new location, and expressed his pleasure that they had chosen to remain in Rancho
Cucamonga, Mr. Buller also stated that their new location was situated near homes and that h
strongly hoped the applicants wouldbe goad neighbors and adhere to the signage ordinances as
stated in the conditions of the Conditional Use hermit, He reflected that there had been some illegal
banners used at the previous location and that code enforcement would be monitoring their use of
signs.
Henry Reiter commented that the approved signage was very attractive and that he was pleased
with the help the city had given him in this regard'.
Brad Buller replied that he was quite pleased with Mr. Reiter' quality control in his developments.
Mr, Buller then stated ;he was glad to have Joel Jones Furniture in rancho Cucamonga and
concluded his statement by indicating the approval of the Conditional Use Permit 98-1 .
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments
ADJOURNMENT
The City planner meeting adjourned at 2-20 p.m.
Sincerely;
XCZ, �. ..
Lois Schrader
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes August''1 1, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNERMINUTES
NO MEETING J
CITY OF RANCHO
CITY PLANNER I OJT
NO MEETING HELD JULY 7, 1998
I
CITY OF RANCHO
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 26, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room at
the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary', Brad Buller, City Planner; Elline Garcia,
Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
April 28, 1998, minutes approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-08 -OPPORTUNITY SALES INC.-A request to establish a
product storage warehouse in a leased space of approximately 14,000 square feet within an
existing building, located at 9456 Roberd Street, in the General Commercial Zone -APN: 202-
092-08.
Ellin e Garcia, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She indicated a Standard Condition
be added to read, "Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform
Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy,
plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and
Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy,"
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing and asked if the requested parking analysis
had been submitted by the applicant.
Ms. Garcia said it had not.
Sam Iftikhar, 9456 Roberd Street, Rancho Cucamonga, explained that with only one employee, he
felt there is adequate parking.
Mr. Buller asked, if in staffs opinion, it is possible to get a parking lay-out on site that is not street
adjacent.
Ms. Garcia answered yes.
Mr. Mikhar reported the area is large enough to support 30 to 35 parking spaces.
Mr. Buller indicated he has been to the site and agrees there is sufficient space to accommodate
the 14 parking spaces required, but still needs to see a site lay-out.
Mr. John lk cBven, Opportunity Sales, Inc., 2975 Leopold Avenue, Suite 101, Hacienda Heights;
also felt there is enough area available to provide adequate parking:
Mr. Buller°a concern involved other parking standards, such as landscaping, lighting, and site
accommodation.
Mr. Iftikhar asked if the 45 feet of empty space in front of the building can be utilized for parking.
Mr.Buller indicated it can not, because of landscape setback requirements coupled with a restriction
which prohibits parked vehicles from backing directly out onto a public street, He then pointed out
that the subject Conditional Use Permit allows the property to be used for warehousing only and any
intensification of that use will be subject to a modification. He then invited public comment.
Herman Pempel, 9505 Base Dine Road, Rancho Cucamonga„ pointed out the site is located on a
dangerous street,
r. Buller closed the public hearing. He voiced his concern about improvements having recently
been made to the site without going through the proper review process. He indicated the property
looks much better, but warned the applicant about following the proper procedures for such
changes.
Mr. Iftikhar indicated he did net know permits were required for the changes he has already made;
but will rectify the situation,
Mr. Buller approved Conditional Use Permit 98-08 with the added condition requiring compliance
q g p
with all Uniform Building'Code and State Fire Marshal regulations, as well as mandating a parking
analysis. He also indicated a sign program will be required if, in the future, the site will be used for
multiple tenants.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT g -g a- KELLY Mc CUES, INC, - A request to establish a spurts
bar and billiard club within an existing building with a total floor area of 5,650 square feet in the
General Commercial Zone, located at 7830 Haven Avenue, Suites 6 through 8 - APN- 1077-
40 1- g.
Iline Garcia, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller,City Planner, asked if the parking spaces immediately in front of the site are also used
by adjacent businesses
M . Garcia responded that she hadn't seen torn many of these spaces in use.
Virginia La Rosa, Leiserve, 8311 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga„ confirmed th tthe e spaces
are usually vacant:
Paul Roberts, applicant,40 'pia Madera, Rancho Banta Margarita, asked if the front area of the
facility can be used as a patio because of the new smoking laws. He pointed out the patrons will
have to walk across a 4 Y2 foot sidewalk to reach it,
Mr. Buller supported a pedestrian friendly environment, He suggested Mr. Roberts work with staff
to develop this area, keeping public safety issues in mind, but cautioned him to also work with the
property owner as well as obtain street furniture approval, which will affect the rest of the shopping
center.
City Planner Meeting i ay 26, 1998
r. Roberts agreed to come back with a detailed plan. He asked if there was room for interpretation
regarding the sprinkler requirements.
Mr. Buller suggested he work with Eire Safety to determine the need for sprinklers, He then closed
the public nearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 98-05,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Them were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:50 p.m.
Sincerely,
Trivia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting May 26, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 28, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 13500 Civic Center[Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tribia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Elline Garcia,
Associate Planner
ANNQUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES_
April 21, 1998, minutes approved:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USA PERMIT -C17 - UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE - A request to
install a 1,056 square foot modular trailer for a temporary office use within the parking area of
an existing industrial complex, located at 11533 Sixth Street -APN; 229-232- ?
Brad Sullen, City Planner, opened the public hearing and rioted that the applicant was not in
attendance. He confirmed Universal Technical Institute's notification by staff. He indicated the
presence of Mr.-Mike Wolf, Lee & Associates, 3535 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, as an
observer of the process. Mr. Buller stated he had read the report and had no questions." He asked
staff if anything new had occurred which is not included in the staff report,
Elline Garcia, Associate Planner, answered no.
Mr. Buller then closed the public hearing and approved Conditional'Use Permit 98-07
PUBLIC-COMMENTS
There were no public comments:
8DJOURN LIEN
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2;33 p.m
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 21, 1998
Brad Buller, Cityr Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2,99 p,m The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller. City Planner; Cecilia Gallardo,
Assistant Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements,
MINUTES
February 19, 1998, minutes approved:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9 -0 - SMITH -A request to construct a 1,102 square foot
second dwelling unit on a 22,895 square foot parcel in the Low Residential District (2 to
dwelling units per acre), located at 13512 Smoke tone Street - API - -7 1-CAB.
Cecilia Callardo, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked staff if any correspondence or telephone calls had been received
from surrounding homeowners regarding the subject application.
s, Gallardo indicated a few ells had been received requesting procedural information related to
the project"as well as are inquiry from a property owner north of the site regarding the height and
location of the structure and confirming compliance to City building codes.
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing:
Cecilia Smith, 13512 Smokestone Street, Rancho Cucamonga, reported the second dwelling unit
is planned as a residence for her mother,
Mr. Buller asked what plans have been made in terms of landscaping.
Lena Seratim, 13512 Smoke tone Street„ Rancho Cucamonga, indicated some landscaping'has
been planned.
Ms. Smith reported a pool has also been planned.
John Neubert, 1488 belly Avenue, Upland, indicated that eventually, a tennis court will also be
added.
Mr. Buller explained his position requiring a fourth parking space, architecturally matching the
house, and suggested options to avoid four garage doors in a row.
Mr. Neub rt indicated the homeowner would like to reduce the 21-foot setback to 11 feet to
compensate for the fourth oar space,
Mr. Puller voiced a concern regarding the description of a 21-foot setback sent to the neighboring
homeowners, versus approval of a modified 11-foot setback. He eked why the homeowner is
requesting the change, because he is not convinced that the placement of a garage space requires
a `I a-foot movement of the second dwelling unit:
r. ( eubert indicated the additional space is desired for the pool area.
Mr. Buller asked the applicant if she preferred a fourth garage space instead of a covered carport.
Ms. Smith stated the idea hadn't been considered because the contractor had not presented the
option.
Mr. Buller 'indicated a flexibility in the Development Code which offers a patiolcarport option
consisting of a g by 19 -:foot unobstructed covered area to satisfy the requirement of a fourth car
space. He voiced a preference to this option, rather than reducing the 21-foot setback by 10 feet.
Mr. Neubert suggested,a compromise concerning the setback reduction.
Mr. Puller felt a compromise could be considered and agreed to work with the applicant. He
indicated o condition be added to provide a Landscape Plan showing how 15 to 20 feet of the
perimeter of the second dwelling will be buffered, using either hardy ape or soft cape. He noted
the applicant asked for some flexibility in the :rear 1-foot setback as proposed in order to
compensate for any new parking space required with this approval and indicated he would consider
that and look at the options when he's presented a plan for the rear yard. Mr. Puller invited public
comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit g -03
with a modification requiring submission of a Landscape Plan for review and approval by the City
Planner prior to issuance of building permits:
* « k;
PLI C.IC COMMENTS
There were no public comments_:
4 * * * *.:
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:25 p.m.
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 2 April 21, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
;
NO MEETING HELD APRIL 7, 1998
I
CITY OF RANCHO
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
O MEETING HELD MARCH 24, '1998
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGACITY PLANNER MINUTES
O MEETING' HELD A 0, 1998
O MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 10, 1998
Brad Buller; City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Doom
at the.Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary„ Brad Buller, City Planner; Nanny Fong, Senior
Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINTES
January 27, 1998, minutes approved
PUBIS I1 AIRINGS
XCQNQIjI,Q,N& LJ$E.PERMIT g -I1 -__MAaI,,QOMMERCF CENTER PARTNERS A
request to establish a florist shop in a leased spade of 1,084 square feet, within Building 7
of Masi Plaza in the General Industrial District, (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -
APN 9-011-7.
Nancy Fond, Senior Planner, presented the staff report:.,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing. He asked the applicant if this will be his first
shop.
Shinn Nguyen, Tammy Austin Florist, 11897 Foothill Boulevard, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga,
indicated this will be his second shop;
Ms. Fong stated the first shop is located in the Terra Vista Town Center. She asked Mr. Nguyen
if the business is franchised.
Mr. Nguyen responded no and indicated it is a family-run business.
Mr. Buller observed this to be a busy time for the applicant and asked if he specializes in any
particular kind of flowers or arrangements.
Mr. Nguyen stated they do everything.
Mr. Buller asked how the applicant competes with the larger florists.
r. Nguyen responded by saying they do the best they a and rely on goad word of mouth,
Mr. Buller asked hove long the Terra Vista shop has been in operation.
Mr, Nguyen replied three years.
Mr. Buller then closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit g -02.
ell -IC COMMENTS
There were no public comments,
6DJOU NMENT
The City planner meeting adjourned at 2A0 p.m,
Sincerely,
w
Trivia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes February 10, 199
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA -
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting''
January 2' , 1 gt
Brad Buller„ City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning;Division Conference Room
at the rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT; Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Steve Hayes,
Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
January 13, 1998,:minutes approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL NAL USE PERMIT IT g -24 - MQUNTAIN VJEEVV BAPTIST
CHURCHI w A request to increase the size of an existing church from 1,425 to 2,289 square
feet in an existing leased" building totaling 7,625 square feet within the Arrow Business
Center; in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located
at 460 Maple Place, Suites 105 and 1"07 -APN: 20 - 1-11:
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the }public hearing.
Adair Zamora, Pastor, Mountain View Baptist Church, P.O. Box 837, Rancho Cucamonga,
announced the church°s intent to eventually,purchase their own property and establish a church
home. He asked for City Planner input regarding potential pitfalls.
Mr. Buller offered his guidance outside of the City Manner meeting. He asked the applicant if he
had any specific questions or issues regarding 'the subject Conditional Use Permit
Mr. Zamora Mated he did not ,
Mr. Buller asked the size of the congregation.
Mr. Zamora responded that attendance varies, but approximately 30 families;
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved the modification tc Conditional Use Permit g -2 .
PUBLIC COMMEN
There were no public comments.
ADJQURNMEN,T
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:13 p.m.
Sincerely,
, .
Tricie Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting January 27, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
January 13, 1998
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
S TAPE EE PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Alan Warren,
Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements,
MINUTES
December 23, 1997, minutes approved
* *Q.*Q*L1*Q_[jEARINGS
A. C0NDITl0N&LQ ,PERMIT 97-26 - DONALD D. DAVENPORT - A request to construct a
Second Dwelling Unit with a three-car garage on .48 acres of land in the Very Low (less than
2 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, located at 5515 Amethyst Street -
APN: 1061-581-38,
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, announced that an RV garage is no longer a part of the
application. He then presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Jay Davenport, 5515 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, noted the minimum number of
parking spaces required for the project is four and asked if there were a maximum number,
Mr. Warren said there is no such requirement.
Elaine Davenport, 5515 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, explained their reasons for
wanting to build a second dwelling unit and indicated there are no plans to utilize this unit for rental
purposes,
Mr. Davenport asked for clarification regarding the 16-foot roof height requirement and its design.
Mr. Warren explained that the roof height cannot exceed 16 feet in height from the point where the
wall meets the grade,
Mr. Davenport presented various options to meet the requirement.
Mr. Warren suggested the project designer contact staff to discuss these options.
Mr. Buller asked the applicant if there will be trees removed during the course of the project.
Mr. Davenport answered yes, but pointed out that the trees to be removed are beginning to
damage existing cement work around the pool and patio area and a retaining wall,
r. Buller asked what is planned as a ground surface material just to the north of the garage,
r. Davenport stated the decision has not yet been made, but a landscape architect will be hired
upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit;
Mr. Buller invited public comment:
Robert Odell, 5505 amethyst, rancho Cucamonga, asked if the structure is to be used as a rental
property and what plans the applicants have for the motor home,
Mrs. Davenport stated the motor home will be stored on a slab next to the garage towards the rear
of the property.
Mr, Buller asked the distance between the gave line of the existing house and the north property.
line.
Mrs. Davenport estimated a distance of 20 feet.
_
r. Odell stated his surprise at the estimate;
r. Davenport estimated a distance of 20 feet
r, Odell asked the width of the motor horse:
Mr. Buller stated that, typically, a motor home is g 11 to 10 feet wide. He felt the fit would be tight,
feasible.__
Mr, Odell voiced his preference that the motor home be removed from the front of the property.
r. Buller announced a letter of opposition had been received from Walter and Myla Bowman, 6536
Malachite avenue, Rancho Cucamonga,
Lee Anne Merritt, 5557 Layton Street, asked how this addition might affect property values,
Mrs: Davenport felt property values would increase:
Ms, Merritt asked the overall square footage of the addition.
Mr. Davenport reported an 1,190 square foot dwelling area with a garage area of 660 square feet.
Mr. Warren pointed out;the condition limiting the addition to 1,825 total square feet because the
property is zoned for 20 percent land coverage limit.
City Manner Minutes 2 January 13, 1998
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing, He indicated a landscape plan will be required to buffer the
view of the second dwelling unit and motor home from the surrounding neighbors as well as a Tree
Removal Permit. He indicated block walls will not be required„ as the neighborhood as nut set
strong precedent for block walls, He suggested hipping the root` to minimize the height of the
structure, He then approved Conditional Use Permit 97-26 with modifications that the structure
shall not exceed 16 feet in height, ands find Landscape Plan and Tree Removal Permit be
submitted subject to City Planner approval„ prior to Building Permit issuance.
PUBLIC P C
There were no public comments.
&D-JOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2,43 p,m.
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division'Secretary
i
i
City Planner Minutes 3 January 13, 1998
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTE
Regular Meeting
December 23, 1997
-Brad Buller; City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at :10 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Cecilia Gallardo, Assistant Planner; tail
Sanchez, Secretary;Willie dal uena, AssistantEngineer; Rebecca lean
Buren, Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
December g„ 19,97, minutes approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -44 - BAS5ETT MATTRESS - A request to establish a
furniture manufacturing plant in a leased space of 114,350 square feet within an existing
building in the General Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the Industrial Area;specific Plan, located
at the northwest corner of Ninth Street and Archibald Avenue -APN, 9-0 1 T1 and 5.
Cecilia Gallardo, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Puller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Ruben Mejia, Bassett Mattress, 3401 Ptiwanua Avenue, Mira Loma, explained that no components
will be manufactured at the site, only mattress assembly will occur.
Alex Moradi, I is Investments, 9301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 315, Beverly Hills, reported that the
parking lot will be resurfaced and double stripped, per the Conditions of Approval, but requested
the tinning of the condition not specify "prior to occupancy." He indicated a more expensive
process, called PetroMat Overlay, rather than a slurry seal is to be used. He then asked if the
Landscape Plan which was originally submitted ;would be acceptable. Mr. Moradi asked the
purpose of a Condition of Approval which requires a concrete curb and fence to surround the
improved slope area east of the loading dock. He also questioned the requirement for a new drive
approach.
Willie Valbu na, Assistant Engineer, stated the drive approach should be made to existing public
works standards, the minimum width being 35 feet because they will be using heavy trucks..
Mr. Moradi indicated he was told at a'previous meeting held on December g, fggy, that a 0-foot
drive approach would be sufficient
Mitch Blagerrnan, Senior RDA Analyst, mentioned he had attended the previous meeting and
reported Chan James, Senior Civil Engineer, indicated them is a minimum -foot approach
requirement, but said that Engineering could review this condition during plan check,
Mr. Valbuena agreed and added that the final decision will be up to Mr. James.
Mr. Moradi indicated the protect has already gone through plan check on the building.
r. V lbuena explained that a plan check will also be required for the off site improvements such
as sidewalks and streetlights.
r. Slagerman stated that, currently, there is no sidewalk at this location: He indicated that lean
James had referred to a Tentative Tract'Map which had never been recorded for the entire
business park area and that he would look at it as if they were individual parcels, not as if it had
recorded. He stated that would them remove the owner from improvements to the west of the
project site,
Mr. Buller summed up those conditions of concern as being the deadline for improvement to the
parking lot, the landscape requirement, the curb with fencing, and the improved drive approach.
He addressed the issues of the sidewalk and the drive approach by stating that the parking
required for this building is on another lot; therefore, you cannot really separate the two b
condition. He indicated the sidewalks are typically required as a public safety issue. He asked Mr.
lagerman to confirm Mr. James comments at the previous meeting, potentially waiving the
modifications to the width of the drive approach if it is greater than 30 feet:
r, Slagerman reported that Mr. James said he Haight be willing to allow some flexibility.
Mr, Moradi reported the width varies from 32 to 36 feet.
Mr. Buller invited public comment,.
Ron Washle, Grubb & Ellis, 3401 Centrelake Drive, Suite 500, Ontario, noted the site is located on
two separate parcels,
r. Buller explained that the required parking for the building is on the second parcel; therefore,
it's included with the project, even though they're separately recorded'parcels. He recommended
a clause be added to the street improvement condition stating the final compliance shall be to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, so that he has the discretion during the field inspection to waive
the drive approach condition if warranted, He then pointed out the eventual need for a complete
sidewalk,
Mr. Mejia asked for an extension until the time a tenant is found for the second parcel because of
the financial impact.
Mr. Buller asked about the timing for the parking lot improvements to be completed.
Mr. Moradi responded two months maximum, He reported the cast of those improvements to be
approximately $140,000.
Mr. Buller asked if staff had found any existing Landscape flans for this parcel.
s. Gallardo reported having found no plans, but mentioned existing planters and islands in the
parking lot which may have been planted at one time.
Mr. Moradi indicated he has a copy of the Landscape Plans from the original development.
Mr, Buller instructed the applicant to resubmit those plans, thereby complying with the condition,
Ms. Gallardo explained the curb and fencing requirement for the slope east of the loading dock will
provide a more finished look to the dock area. She indicated the fend is only required at the curb.
Mr. Moradi;pointed out the area will eventually be a driveway. He asked if fencing alone would
satisfy the requirement.
Mr. Buller suggested an asphalt, rather than concrete curb.
r. Moradi agreed.
r. Buller directed Ms, Gallardo to confirm that access isn't required by the Fire District, He then
closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 97-44 with modifications requiring
the parking lot be resurfaced by March 1, 1998, the landscaping installed by April 1, 1998, and the
drive approach and sidewalk construction to be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
PUBLIC CO ITS
There were no public comments,
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m.
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 3 December 23, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
December 9, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PRESENT Tricia, Ashby, Secretary, Brad Buffer, City Planner, Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner
ANNQQNQEMEN.TB
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
November 12 1997, minutes approved
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-39 -COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH (G.A.P. PROGRAM)
-A request to establish a food distribution facility totaling 4,290 square feet within an existing
multi-tenant industrial complex in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan, located at 8768 Helms Avenue, Unit A, at the northwest corner of Helms
Avenue and Feron Boulevard -APN: 209-032-52
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He pointed out the conditions of
approval specify that no religious services are allowed and food distribution is limited to Friday
evenings after 4.-30 p.m. and weekends.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing and asked if the specified hours of distribution
was a staff recommendation, or proposed by the applicant.
Mr. Grahn indicated the time was proposed by the applicant.
Mr, Buller suggested modifying the condition to read weekdays, rather than a specific day, to
provide some flexibility for the applicant.
Pari Blackman, C.A.P. Food Bank, 8768 Helms Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, responded favorably
to the modification,
Mr. Buller asked if applicant had approached the neighboring businesses with a specific day for
distribution,
Ms. Blackman answered that she had and stated that her neighbors have no problem with a Friday
evening distribution because they are all closed. She did not feel that it really mattered to them
what day the distribution is held.
Mr. Buller recommended the condition specify weekdays after 4:30 p.m. and weekends.
Ms. Blackman asked if window signs are allowed.
Mr. Buller responded affirmatively and explained that whatever sign the applicant or the landlord
puts up must be in accordance with the ity`s Sign Program, He then closed the public hearing
and approved Conditional Use permit 97-39 with a modification to expand distribution to any
weekday after :30 p.m. and weekends.
�'Ulvl MMI�JT
Thera were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at :11 p.m:
Sincerely,
`Tricia-Ashby
Planning Division Secretory
City planner Meeting 2 December 9, 1
I
CITY OF RANCHOlJ .AM O N
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 25, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM N A
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
November 12, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Ream
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary, Brad Buller, City Planner; bandy Fong, Senior
Planner; Fern Grahn, Associate Planner; lean' dames; Senior Civil
Engineer; Brent Le Count, Associate Planner„ Alan Warren, Associate
Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
INQT
September 23, 1997, minutes approved
PUBLIC HEARING
3
A. QQNUITICNAL USE PERMIT g -34 -TRUE AUTHORITY FAITH MINISTRIES - A request
to establish a church in a 1,30 square foot leased space within an existing building in the
Community Commercial District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located
at 9546 Foothill Boulevard - APNI- 33-1 1-1 .
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He indicated he had received one
letter of opposition regarding the parking issue,
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked how the church had come to the City"s attention after almost six
months of operation.
Mr. Le Count reported the church had applied fora Conditional Use Permit in December, 1996,
but it was deemed to be incomplete.
r, Buller opened the public hearing;
Mike Radamaker, property manager, MCR Services, 1425 Writ Foothill Boulevard, Suite 200,
Upland, reported their lease agreement with the tenant stipulated a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
be obtained from the City. He stated MGR Services was notified that the CUP was deemed
incomplete and had allowed the applicant to use the area for storage only. Mr. Radamakor stated
his firm had no knowledge of church activities being conducted at this location until notified by the
City's Code Enforcement Division and since that time has been assisting the applicant in the CUP
process. He reported having met with the surrounding tenants, who had no problem with the
church as a neighbor. He mentioned the parking issue as a concern, but felt the hours of operation
offset any potential problem
r. Buller asked who the surrounding tenants are and whether or not MGR Services also manages
the Baker's Restaurant property.
r. Radamaker responded in the affirmative. He indicated a preschool is located to one side of
the church and a real estate office on the other.
r. Buller closed the public hearing;-He felt the church use is workable in the environment. He
questioned how the applicant could operate for 6 months without the knowledge of the
management company.'
Mr. Radamaker reported comparing electrical consumption for the period and saw only a
difference after the tenant moved in; the blinds remained closed, and a lock box remained in place,
e indicated a "quiet enjoyment" clause in the lease which states tenants cannot disrupt their
neighbors.
Mr, Buller asked if the tenant had read and concurred with the recommended conditions.
Mr. Radamaker indicated he had:
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 96-34. He reminded Mr.
Radamaker to monitor his tenants to remain in compliance with City standards,
B, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-34 LBM a INSURANCE -A'request for authorization to
establish an insurance office facility of 2,000 square feet in the Industrial Area Specific Plan
(Subarea 11), located within an existing industrial complex at 9229 Utica Avenue, Unit 1
APN: 09-41'1-17
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented.the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked Mr. Warren if the business is currently in operation with an
unpermitted sign.
Mr. Warren confirmed the business is currently in operation and stated he had been unable to find
a permit on file for the existing sign.
Mr, Buller opened the public hearing:
Brad Martin, LSMG Insurance, 9229 Utica Avenue, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, reported the
sign was installed by the management company as part of the lease agreement.
r. Warren reported the sign appears to be in compliance, but the City has no record of such.
r. Buller asked the name of the management company.
Mr. Martin replied that Tony M Dougle and Kurt Dewey signed the lease agreement and that he
was not involved in those arrangements,
Mr. Warren presented a letter from a neighboring tenant, Chris Meyer of Meyer Construction, who
reported having no problem with the proposed use.
Mr. Buller closed the public heating and indicated he saw no problems with the use proposed. He
advised the applicant to follow-up on the sign issue and approved Conditional Use Permit 97- 4.
City Planner Minutes 2 November 12, 1997
C. CONDIIIQNIAL USE PERMIT 7- 4 ALLSTATE I-IIMI - A request to t bli h
recycling facility on a site that contains outside storage of materials and an existing building
totaling 10,000 square feet on 4.5 acres of lead in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15)
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of
Whittram Avenue -APN 9- 91-17,
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Tom Edwards, architect, Gary Miller & Associates, 350 5th Street, Ban Bernardino, asked for
clarification about parking restrictions outside the gate:
r. Grahn indicated the 20-foot landscape setback, relative to Etiwanda Avenue, did not allow
parking outside the gate
Mr. Buller pointed out the 4 -foot distance between the ultimate curbface and the existing gate
could provide an opportunity for limited parking, but meeting the minimum-average landscape
requirement would preclude that option.
r. Edwards stated the property owner preferred parking within the gated area for security reasons.
Mr. Buller asked the frequency of cars and trucks going in and out per day.
Mr. Edwards reported very few cars, but quite a few trucks, which do not utilize the parking area.
r. Buller asked how the applicant will be defining separated parking from the enclosed storage
yard.
Mr. Edwards explained that Southern California Edison owns the property to the south which
contains a shared access road with a defined area for truck ingress and egress, while cars will
utilize the entrance near the office.
Mr. Buller mentioned his concern regarding the height of stacked material.
r. Grahn pointed out the condition which specifies that storage shall not exceed the screen height
within 100 feet of the screen.
Mr. Edwards indicated a correction to the Site Plan which shows the masonry wall running
east/west,when in fact, it runs ,north/south, parallel to Etiwanda Avenue, without an "U curve. He
proposed an -foot metal fence eventually replacing the existing chain link.
r. Boller emphasised the importance of adhering to the conditions stipulated, specifically that of
stacking. He asked if the proposed wall will match the one recently built by the Chino Water Basin.
Mr, Gahn answered in the affirmative.
Mr. Buller indicated his concern regarding an abrupt end to the masonry wall where it turns the
corner and becomes a fence.
r. Edwards stated this concern was never brought up: He described the fencing as an -foot
high„ corrugated enamel-painted metal.
Mr. Buller requested the opportunity to see the material prior to approval.
Mr. Edwards offered to redesign the masonry wall, providing the curve as specified in the Site Plan
instead.
City Planner Minutes - November 12, 1997
Mr. Buller agreed, He closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 97-24,
emphasizing that six parking spaces shall be provided and shall be separated from the enclosed
storage yard and the masonry wall shall be turned along the south side to a point of 120 feet.
D, CON DITIONAL-USE PERMIT 97-37-GOOD PP FINE CIQ6-R-a-A request to establish
a bar in an existing cigar lounge within a leased space of 2,800 square feet in the Virginia
Dare Business Center, in the General Commercial District, located at 8034 Haven Avenue,
Suite B -APN: 1077-661-0Z
Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho
Cucamonga, indicated the business has been open for two months and the beer and wine license
is critical to it's long term success.
Mr. Buller asked if cigar smoking is allowed in the lounge.
Mr, Daniel J. Bruncati, Good Fellas Fine Cigars, 8074 Haven, Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga,
responded affirmatively and added that with the addition of beer and wine, customers would be
more apt to stay and enjoy the other amenities offered,
Mr. Buller asked if the other amenities are provided to create an environment to help market the
cigars, or if the applicant considers themselves in competition with Shelley's.
Mr. Bruncati answered in the negative. He stated the purpose was not one of competition, but
enhancement.
Mr. Buller asked how the applicant chose Rancho Cucamonga to establish a cigar lounge.
Mr. Bruncati felt the Clty has been demographically overlooked and wanted to provide the
community a place to feel as ease without paying expensive membership fees. He indicated a
broad spectrum of clientele and a positive response.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 97-37,
E_UEILIQ COMMENTS
There were no public comments,
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:58 p.m.
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes November 12, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER INUTE
NO MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 11, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER 'INUTE
O MEETING HELD OCTOBER 21, 1997
>I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD OCTOBER 7, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
September 23, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAEE-ERE,$-E,L4J Tricia Ashby, Planning Division Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner;
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Alan Warren, Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
August 26, 1997, minutes approved
PQBLICHEARJNGS
A. QONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-32-DAVID L. MAN WARREN CORPORATION-A request
for authorization to establish a medium manufacturing facility of 40,000 square feet in
Subarea 2, of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located within an existing industrial building
at 9146 Ninth Street -APN: 209-012-04:
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Jerry Maxwell, David L. Manwarren Corporation, 1957 E. Cedar Street, Ontario, agreed with the
condition requiring 80 parking spaces, but did have a question regarding Engineering's street light
condition in terms of quantity and spacing,
Mr. Buller stated that even though there was no exhibit showing exact locations, typically, 150 to
160 feet is needed between street lights, staggered with those across the street.
Scott Ostlund, Lee &Associates, 3535 E. Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, mentioned the street
light condition was unexpected and had not been placed in the budget.
Mr. Buller asked if a cost estimate had been received for one street light.
Mr. Ostfund replied it had not.
Mr. Maxwell asked if sidewalk installation is also conditioned into the project.
Can James, Senior Civil Engineer, confirmed sidewalks are not required,
Mr. Ostlund asked for the number of street lights required and the approximate cost.
Mr. James indicated the total number of street lights are dependent upon placement of existing
lights, with one required every 150 to 200 feet. He reported the light standard and conduit will cost
about $2,000 per street light without the enemy connection. He reported there could be additional
costs if Edison requires transformers.
Mr. ( stlund asked if City policy allowed the phasing of improvements over a period of time..
Mr. James asked if building permits are required with this project.
Mr. Buller indicated yea, but only for tenant improvements.
Mr. James indicated all required improvements will have to be made prior to sign-off of the final
building permits. He explained the non-refundable deposit referred to in Engineering Condition No.
as being an initial energy charge by Edison.
Mr. Ostlund voiced his understanding that his client can complete all improvements within one year,
but continue to do business„ prior to final building' permits being signed-off.
r. James concurred.
r. Buller encouraged the applicant to be creative and not limit themselves in bettering the frontage
of their protect. He asked Mr. Maxwell to think about future master planning.
Mr. Maxwell asked if he could interpret this to mean they could take some time for completion.
Mr. Buller pointed out the required minimum levels of improvement but stated he is willing to work
with the applicant, provided a master plan is presented.
Mr. Warren indicated an 0-space parking lot plan needs to be submitted before permits for the first
phase are issued and explained how to divide the project into phases,
Mr Buller invited;public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing and approved
Conditional Use Permit 7- ,
PUBLIC CaMMENTS
There were no public comments.
6DJC.URN ENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:23 p.m:
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 2 September 23, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
O MEETING E D SEPTEMBER 9, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CU AMON A
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
t the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Trcia Ashby, Secretary, Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; [fan dames, Senior
Civil Engineer
ANNOUNCEMENTS
None
Ml NNUTE "
July 22, 1991, minutes approved ,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-1 u-OASIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY-A request to establish
a private school within an existing building totaling 16,457 square feet on 3.25 acres of land
in the Medium Residential Development District -14 dwelling units per acre), located at
9488 19th Street -APN: 201-474-02 through 04.
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presenter) the staff report,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing,
Otis McIntyre, Oasis Christian Academy, 98 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, agreed with the
conditions. He reported receiving a telephone call from an adjacent property owner concerning the
project.
Mr. Buller asked the applicant if he intends to fully comply with the conditions of approval within the
designated time frames.
Pastor McIntyre said he will fully comply with the conditions of approval, but voiced his concern
regarding the block wall requirement. He reported purchasing the adjacent property to the west
which already has an existing -foot block wall and asked if the condition is still applicable.
Mr. Puller stated the subject application deals only with the two most easterly parcels; one where
the church is currently located and the second on the parcel proposed to have the ball court. He
indicated two other separate parcels to the immediate west which are not part of this application.
Pastor McIntyre concurred.
Mr. Buller asked if the applicant has already purchased the Shibata property.
Pastor McIntyre answered in the affirmative.
Mr. Buller explained any use of the new parcel as part of the school facility will require an
amendment to the Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Buller reported a sign had been installed which had not received City Planner approval, per the
subject Conditional Use Permit.
Pastor McIntyre indicated a foundation had been poured, but he had been unable to obtain the
required signature of the property owner on the Sign Permit application until Friday of last week and
because City offices are closed, was not able to submit the application prior to the sign's temporary
placement:
r. Buller 's concern was the assumption that the sign will be approved and was erected prior to
a permit being issued. He pointed out it is a violation of the City Sign Ordinance for a'sign to be
put up before a permit is issued. - He again requested Paster McIntyre's compliance with the
conditions, prior to doing anything on the site.
Pastor McIntyre responded that he does intend to comply:
Mr. Buller asked the location of the drop off area.
Pastor McIntyre indicated a circular driveway on the eastern edge of the property.
Mr. Buller asked if it is the applicant's intention to allow parents to drop off within the drive aisle
without pulling into a parking stall.
Pastor McIntyre admitted that may be a little difficult if someone needs to park.
Mr. Buller asked Mr. Hayes to work with the applicant to provide an adequate drop off area,
designated parking spaces, time limits, and signs in the parking lot. He then invited public
comment:
Robert Gayl, resident„ 9412 1 gth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, property owner of the parcel
between the school and the housing;project to the west, reported originally purchasing the property
because it was zoned Medium Density and felt it had development possibilities. He indicated he
had spoken with the City Planner many years ago and learned of a condominium project planned
for the Shibata property`which;'required his property for ingress and egress, He voiced his concern
regarding the value of his property, now that the church has purchased the Chibata property;
Mr. Buller asked the size of the parcel:
Mr. Gayl responded 90 feet wide by 330 feet long.
Mr. Buller explained that because the issue under discussion does not include the Shibata parcel„
there will be a requirement for another City Planner hearing to address the design, lay out, and
interaction of that parcel with Mr. ayl's property. He further stated, from a master planning
standpoint„'he would like to determine the best use for both parcels. He cautioned Pastor McIntyre
against using the Shibata house or property for school use until the proper permits are issued..
City Planner Minutes 2 August 26, 1997
Mr. Gayl requested a block wall be required, dividing his property from theirs, if his property does
not get absorbed into the school project.
Mr. Butler asked Pastor McIntyre if the school owns the Shibata parcel free and clear.
Pastor McIntyre answered in the affirmative.
Mr. Buller asked Mr. Hayes if adequate security lighting is conditioned into the project.
Mr. Hayes responded it is not, but agreed that security lighting could be added as a condition of
approval.
Mr. Buller recommended adding the condition, phasing it within the 180-day time period. He then
asked Mr. James if there is a timing requirement for the conditioned street improvements,
Mr. James pointed out that the condition applies only upon further development,
Mr. Buller asked the applicant if he intended to apply for a historic landmark designation within the
one-year time limit.
Pastor McIntyre answered yes.
Mr. Buller pointed out possible building code incentives under the designation. He reminded the
applicant of his responsibilities prior to commencement of school use on the property,
Pastor McIntyre agreed.
Mr. Buller approved Conditional Use Permit 97-10, with modifications to require security lighting
and allow placement of the block wall to the west of the adjacent parcel if an application for
development of that parcel is received within 180 days.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-28 - UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE - A request to
establish an automotive vocational school within an existing building occupying 71,872 square
feet of floor area, in the General Industrial District, Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street -APN: 229-262-37,
Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, will be filling in for
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. He indicated he had read the staff report and asked Mr. Le Count
if there was anything further to add.
Mr. Le Count answered no.
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing.
Pam Steele, Hogle-Ireland, 4200 Latham Street, Suite B, Riverside, raised the issue of an
Engineering Condition requiring a cash deposit in-lieu of construction for the future installation of
sidewalk and landscaping of the median along Sixth Street. She pointed out this area does not
abut the subject parcel and requested the condition be deleted.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, pointed out the finger between Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Street
being public right-of-way creates an awkward situation and explained the intent of the request. He
felt it was reasonable to implement fee collection in order to help disburse the cost between other
City Planner Minutes 3 August 26, 1997
possible projects in the area. He estimated that the cost of a sidewalk and a median will be about
$20,000. He indicated this requirement is not mandated by City ordinance, but the Development
Code directs staff to impose reasonable conditions, and the Engineering Division is trying to
implement the distribution of the costs in order to benefit the whole area.
Mr. Buller asked if the applicant has the option of installing the sidewalk, as opposed to paying the
in-lieu fee.
Mr. James pointed out the two issues involved; the sidewalk and the landscaping of the median,
with the point of connection actually being too small to install; however, the applicant could install
the sidewalk.
Mr. Buller asked if research had been done as to the reason why the original project had not been
conditioned for these items.
Mr. James indicated staff was not able to find anything.
Mr. Buller asked if the conditions placed on the project to the north was done so by the Planning
Commission.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, confirmed it was approved by the Planning Commission,
Mr. Buller invited public comment,
Rosetta Baird, Amphastar Pharmaceutical, 13760 Magnolia Avenue, Chino, asked if the proposal
includes removal of any existing parking spaces.
Mr. Buller said it does not.
Steve Stout, Amphastar Pharmaceutical, 13760 Magnolia Avenue, Chino, reported a continuance
had been requested and went on to explain his firm manufactures highly technical
pharmaceuticals. He feared air quality may become an issue, even though the applicant must
comply with state regulations. He indicated Amphastar must comply with very strict federal
regulations.
Mr, Buller explained a continuance could not be granted automatically over the phone. He
presented two letters dated August 26, 1997, one signed by three adjoining tenants; Tim Creager
of Light Concerns, Robert Fermin of Regal Rattan, Incorporated, and Rosetta Baird of Amphastar
Pharmaceuticals, He indicated the second letter, signed by Ms. Baird and Mr. Stout, lists concerns
including; air quality, the type of students that will be attending the school, parking lot traffic and
parking, inside parking for Building No. 1, security issues, graffiti, and traffic issues. He asked the
applicant about air quality issues in relation to the proposed use.
Ms. Steele reported speaking to the project's architect who indicated there has never been a
complaint regarding air quality at any of the other three locations; Chicago, Houston, or Phoenix,
She indicated an exhaust system which protects the students inside the building. She reported
that, at most, only half of the 38 bays would be running at any one time, for a maximum of 15
minutes, less than three times a day,. She pointed out that other, permitted uses, are much more
intense in terms of poor air quality. She indicated enrollment typically consists of returning students
who wish additional training.
Mr. Stout voiced his concern regarding loitering.
City Planner Minutes 4 August 26, 1997
Ms. Steele reported on site security at the other three facilities. She indicated she would not be
opposed to staff adding a condition requiring security:
Mr. Buller pointed out a condition which requires the Conditional Use Permit to be brought before
the City Planner if operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or
operations. He felt that graffiti removal should be placed as a condition of approval. He then asked
Mr. Stout if adequate parking was;his concern, rather than parking within wilding No. 1„ as
mentioned in his letter.
Mr. Stout agreed that students parking in spaces allocated for Amphastar could become an issue.
Mr. Buller asked if Amphastar has designated parking spaces associated with their square footage.
r. Stout indicated the 416 spaces allocated are not enough and have had to ask their neighbors
to share their spaces;
Mr. Buller observed there is nothing which prohibits Amphastar from identifying their parking
spaces:
s. Steele indicated there is enough designated;parking allocated to Universal for their students,
Mr. Buller then addressed the first,letter and pointed out the condition which requires campus
security between the hours of :00 p„m. and 11:00 p.m. should, in fact, read between :gg a.m.and
11:00 p.m,
Ms. Baird brought up the issue of trash and general cleanliness of the project.
Ms. Steele responded that the owner of the property visited the Phoenix site and was impressed
with the cleanliness of the operation.
r. Stout asked if all automotive work will be done indoors.
Ms. Steele answered yes.
Mr. Buller stated ;he cannot set policy or overturn a Planning Commission decision and, as such,
reluctantly supports the Engineering condition requiring an in-lieu cash deposit for sidewalks and
median landscaping, but the applicant has the option to refer' the matter to the planning
Commission for a policy appeal. He asked if items such as public sidewalks and medians could
be phased-in over a period of several years,
Mr. James indicated a bond is usually used to secure improvements you're going to do yourself.
Mr. Buller stated some type of security is needed to guarantee the work will eventually be
completed instead of placing a condition with a time limit and then possibly having to revoke the
Conditional Use Permit.
Ms. Steele suggested the applicant could contribute their fair share when a neighboring use comes
up.
Mr. Buller asked if a cash contribution or an agreement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
could be entered into at this time to secure the applicant's participation when median landscaping
or sidewalks are to be installed.
City Planner Minutes 5 August 26, 1997
Mr. James explained this arrangement would then become a form of lien agreement and, as such,
is the only form of control, as it's recorded against the property in the event the property is sold.
He indicated current City Engineer policy, based on City Council direction, doesn't allow lien
agreements, only cash contributions in-lieu of construction.
Ms. Steele asked if a deferred agreement, recorded with the deed would be possible.
Mr. James deferred to Mr. Butler's judgement.
Ms. Steele felt her client would be willing to resolve the issue with the City Engineer within the 10-
day appeal period, but asked if the City would allow building permits to be pulled prior to
occupancy, rather than resolution of the conditions,
Mr. Buller asked when the applicant intends to start pulling permits,
Mike Wolf, Hogle-Ireland, 4200 Latham Street, Suite B, Riverside, reported the school anticipates
work to begin January 1, 1998, and the first classes scheduled for late March, 1998.
Mr. Buller suggested leaving the condition as is, "prior to issuance of building permits,"
Ms. Steele agreed.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 97-28, with
modifications to add a condition requiring removal of graffiti and in-lieu fees to be approved by the
City Engineer,
C. COtNQITIONALUSE PERMIT 82-12 MODIFICATION - CHILDREN'S WORLD -A request to
add kindergarten through 6th grade curriculum to a previously approved 11,311 square foot
preschool facility on 2.98 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units
per acre), located at 10111 Church Street -APN: 1007-271-08.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
David Moss, Moss and Associates, 612 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 105, Santa Monica, reported the
applicant is aware of their responsibility with regard to parking and traffic mitigation.
Mr. Buller asked if there has been any communication with the neighbor to the east regarding
noise, traffic, or parking,
Marion Harris, Principal, Children's World , 10110 Church Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated there
have been no problems,
Mr. Le Count reported receiving nothing regarding the notice of this hearing or any Code
Enforcement issues over the last year and a half.
Mr. Buller pointed out that, should parking become an issue, the adjoining property would be the
only possible choice for expansion.
Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit (Modification) 82-12,
City Planner Minutes 8 August 26, 1997
RUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments,
A-DJOURNMENT
The=City Planner meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m.
Sincerely;
� a
Trica Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 7 August 26, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANA<
CITY PLANNER NNER MINUTE
NO MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
July 22 199
Brad Buller, City;Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Trieia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City planner; Alan Warren,
Associate Planner
ANNQ,UNCEMENTS
None
MINUTE
June 24, 1997 minutes approved ;
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. D1TI I AL U B PFl MII g7-21 -UNIVBR 1 OF LA VFRNF - A request to establish
continuing education facility within 7,776 square feet of leased'space in a multi-story office
building, located at 10535 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 400 within the Haven Avenue Overlay
District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan -APN: '208- 2-6 .
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked why staff had placed d condition limiting square footage rather
than hours of operation or number of students:'
Mr. Warren felt that an expansion of classrooms would be a good barometer of additional review
required for parking demands:
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing.
Janet Snow, Assistant Dean of the School of Continuing Education, La Verne University, 1950
Third Street, La Verne, voiced her concern regarding Planning Division Condition No. 6. She
stated that even though evening classes begin at 5,00 p.m., students begin arriving by 4:30 p.m.
She suggested a change in the Condition to reflect the earlier time.
Fred Delaney, Spectrum Property Management, 8799 Balboa Avenue, Suite 260, San Diego,
stated his firm is very much in favor of the University of La Verne"s move to Rancho Cucamonga.
He reported looking into the parking Issue and feels this use is a positive one for the building:-
Linda Rehm, Spectrum Property Management„ 10535 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 242, Rancho
Cucamonga, pointed out that both daytime end and evening start times outlined in Condition No.
6 should read 6:99 p.m.
Mr. Buller reported having a conversation with Mr, Delaney prior to the submittal of the application
wherein Mr. Delaney was encouraged to speak with neighboring tenants and adjacent property
owners regarding the subject use; Mr. Buller reported receiving two favorable phone calls in
response. He acknowledged the satellite school will be relocating from its- current Riverside
address.
Heather Russell, University of La Verne, 1950 Third Street, La Verne, expressed her opinion that
some of the current Riverside students will follow the school to its new location. She anticipates
attracting Rancho Cucamonga residents as well:
lbs. Snow reported weekend students will have the choice of attending classes on the main
campus in La Verne or the new location in Rancho Cucamonga,
Mr. Buller asked if the variety of Masters programs offered will change from semester to semester.
lbs. Russell reported primary degree programs are offered in Business Administration and Health
Administration, as well as a variety of Bachelor Degree programs:
Mr. Buller asked if the University works with any of the local medical facilities.
s. Fussell indicated they have been closely associated with San Antonio Hospital for number
of years.
Mr. Buller described the quarterly New Business Reception hosted by the City and encouraged the
La Verne University representatives to become involved with the Chamber of Commerce and the
City's Redevelopment Agency. He then suggested revising Planning Condition No, 7 to read 8,000
square feet, rather than 7,770 square feet, to provide some leeway for the future.
Ms. Snow and Mr. Delaney concurred,
Mr. Buller agreed to modify Planning Condition No, 8 to read Monday through Friday day time end
and might time start times to begin at :30 p.m. instead of : g p.m. He asked Mr. Delaney if he
felt this will be an issue with the surrounding tenants:
r. Delaney did not view this as a problem,
Hearing no public comment, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use
Permit 97- 1, with modifications to planning Conditions 7 and 8, limiting square footage and
adjusting the hours of operation.
PQQLl lUlMENT
None
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:22 p,m
F Sincerely,
�ILV'-A"r-A 6Z4�
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 2 duly 22, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
June 24, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Mannar to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning; Division Conference boom
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, rancho Cucamonga, California,
STAFF PP BENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City planner; Torn Gra n,
Associate Planner
A N( UNC" ENTB
Them were no announcements.
MINUTEB
June 10, 1997 minutes approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGB
X C NDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-1 -THOMAS WINERY, LIQUOR - A request to relocate
an existing liquor store to a directly adjacent suite within the Special Commercial District
(Subarea ) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APNw 208-101-21
Torn Crahn,Associate Planner, presented the staff report; He reported past signage issues which
were dealt with through Code Enforcement and have been resolved:
Brad 'Puller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Baadoun Ghayour, owner of Thomas Finery Liquor, 6979 Palm Court, riverside, stated there have
been no violations in the eight years he has owned the business.
r Buller indicated he had visited the site recently and had spoken to Mr. Chayour several years
ago regarding signage, lighting, and security issues. He reminded the applicant about the City's
sign regulations and ordinances, property upkeep, and the potential for problems regarding
loitering:
Mr. Chayour expressed concern with regard to security lighting, but reported the landscaping is
being,trimmed more often to promote a safer environment,
r. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use Permit 97-1 8.
PLJ l MM NT
There were no public comments.
The City Planner meeting adjourned at :15 p.m.
Sincerely,
Tricia .Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 2 guns 24, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNERMINUTE
O MEETING HELD JULY 8, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUC .M NGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
June 10, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:1 g p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Jeanenne
Spikes, Acting Secretary
ANNOUNC EN:[S
Them were no announcements.
MINUTES,
The minutes of May 18 and 27, 1997, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A, CONDITIONAL NAL USE PERMIT 97-08 - BH I CHIANTI RESTAURANT - A request to
establish a bar facility in conjunction with a 4,750 square foot restaurant within the Thomas
Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial District, Subarea 2, of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located at 8045 'Vineyard Avenue, Unit One - APN: 208-1 1-28,
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report,
Brad Buller City Planner, questioned the proposed 25 percent capitation on restaurant uses.
s. Fong stated that the current users (including the now closed Road House Cafe) and this
proposed restaurant comprise 24A percent which would be the maximum allowable under the
proposed limitation. The billiard parlor is not considered a restaurant use and not included in the
calculations.
Mr, Buller asked the applicant if there were any questions or comments about the report or
proposed conditions.
Mr. Sartaj Singh, applicant, 8976 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they would like
to increase the hours of operation for the bar to remain open until 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday.
r. Buller questioned the hours recommended in the staff report:
Ms. Fong stated that staff set those hours based on surrounding users.
Mr. Buller questioned whether any other users within the center were allowed to remain open until
the requested hours.
Ms. Fong pulled the file for Cue &View Billiards and found the bar was permitted to remain open
until 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday; 12 midnight on Sunday-, and until I a.m. Monday through
Thursday.
Mr. Buller agreed to amend the hours for the bar to match those for Cue & View,
Mr. Buller questioned the applicant about any intended entertainment.
Mr. Singh stated they plan on having only one piano player.
Mr. Buller informed them that if there is any increase in entertainment, an Entertainment Permit is
required,
Ms, Mary Surdelich, Leasing Agent, 8976 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, noted the
correct amount of square footage is 4,802 for this tenant,
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing.
Hearing no public testimony, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved'Conditional Use
Permit 97-06 with modification to the hours of operation for the bar to match those for Cue & View
Billiards.
PUBLLQ COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner meeting adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
Sincerely,
Al
anenne Spikes
Acting Secretary
�'
City Planner Minutes 2 June 10, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONCA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 27 1 gg
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
t the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
TAEE PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Tom Crahn,
Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT g - - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT LQMPANY -A request to
develop a 6,500 square foot commercial building within an existing commercial center in
the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of 1 gth and
Carnelian Streets -APN: 201-221-4 , Continued from May 13, 1997.
The applicant, Cary Bauer, Leuw►s Development Company, 1461 Mountain Avenue, Upland, was
not present. Brad Buller, City Planner, contacted the applicant by phone who indicated he did not
feel it necessary to attend as LewisDevelopment was in agreement with the Resolution as
presented, deleting the Engineering conditions requiring resolution of all C ltrans issues prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Mr. Buller then opened the public hewing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing and
approved Conditional Use Permit 96-35.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT'
The City Planner Public Hearing adjourned at 2:18 p.m
Sincerely,
t2I , l�
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
CITE" OF RANCHO CUCAMC GA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 18, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to Girder at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Can James, Senior
Civil"Engineer
NNCL.IlSIQEME T
There were no announcements.
MINUTES
February 25, 1997, minutes approved.
March 11, 1997, minutes approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. GtND'ITIONAI- I 1 PE MIT 97-12 - PAGE NET-A request to establish a retail sales use
in conjunction with an existing office use in the Haven Avenue Overlay District of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven
Avenue - APN: 20 -82- 8.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. He noted a correction in Planning
Condition No. 8, changing the maximum retail sales floor area from 20 to 25 percent.
Brad Buller, City Planner, asked if any correspondence had been received regarding the item
r. Coleman responded in the negative.
r, Buller asked if the property owners had consented to the retail use of the property.
r. Coleman stated the application appears to have been signed by Page Net.
Mr. Buller opened the public bearing and asked the identity of the current owner of the property and
whether they have consented to the retail use of the property.
Donna Moore, 11455 El Camino Real, San Diego, reported the building is in receivership and
permission has been granted by the owners to proceed. She pointed out Page Net is dealing
through an attorney and has been in this location since October 199 ..
i
Mr. Buller asked if other tenants in the building are aware of the proposed retail activity.
Ms. Moore responded in the affirmative.
Mr. Buller asked if there were any questions regarding the staff report or the recommended
conditions in the Resolution.
Ms. Moore stated she had none.
David Earle, 24454 Avenue De Los Ninos, Laguna Niguel, reported he was on hand to discuss
antenna issues relating to the item.
Mr, Buller indicated antennas were not an agendi ed item, but offered hire the opportunity to speak
with Mr. Coleman after the meeting. He asked if the component of the antennas related to the
retail use of the facility.
Mr. Earle acknowledged it could be considered two separate items.
Ms. Moore concurred.
Hearing no further comment, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use
Permit 97-12.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95- 5 - LEWIS,DEVEL PMFN"1 S MPAN - A request to
develop a 5,599 square foot commercial building with an existing commercial center in the
Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and
Carnelian Street - APN: 201-221-45.
As the applicant was not;present, Mr. Buller indicated Item "C"would be tabled for now.
. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-95 -ALBB RFISAM N - A request to establish a liquor
and convenience store within an existing building of 2,148 square feet in the Neighborhood
Commercial District, located at 8655 19th Street -APN; 292-924-19.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report:
Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced correspondence dated May 5, 1997, from Leticia Castillejo,
a neighboring property* owner„ who opposes the project. He asked Ms, Fong if staff contact with
the Police Department was in the farm of a written statement or direct comment
Ms. Fong indicated direct comment,
Mr. Buller asked the applicant for their response to the staff report and conditions of approval.
City Planner Minutes 2 May 13, 199
Michael Rademaker, Property Manager/MCR Services„ Inc., 1425 W. Foothill Boulevard, Suite 200,
Upland, stated his clients concurred with the staff report, but would like the opportunity to respond
to the comments of the opposing property owner.
Mr. Buller agreed. He then read Mrs. Castillejo's letter into the record. The letter outlined her
concerns regarding safety issues and her proximity to the proposed liquor store.
Mr. Rademaker stated Ms. Castillejo's. concerns were netted by his property owners. He pointed
out the use being requested is consistent with permitted uses granted by the City in the past as well
as those which can currently be approved under a conditional use permit. He indicated his
company has been unsuccessful for three years in finding a suitable replacement tenant, Mr.
Rademaker reported four proposals in three years, all four being convenience/liquor store uses.
He pointed out neighboring building owners also have concerns regarding harmony with their
neighbors: He indicated the four previous proposals were turned drawn because of lack of
experience„ lack of capital, or lack of"'other He pointed out the current applicant has other liquor
store locations, which were inspected by the property owner prior to commencement of
negotiations. He noted a clause in the lease which requires the tenant to furnish security as
needed, based on the property owner's determination,-or said security will be furnished by the
landlord and charged to the applicant.
Matt Nisson, property owner, 14462 Red Hill Avenue, "Tustin, reported the area directly behind the
proposed convenience store is fenced and topped with barbed wire to deter potential theft and
vandalism.
Mr. Buller asked if the applicant's other two retail businesses are in compliance with local zoning
and sign ordinances,
Abdo Alberre, applicant, 10150 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, responded affirmatively,
Mr, Puller cautioned the applicant regarding the C ty's Sign and Newsrack Ordinances.
Mr. Alberre assured Mr. Buller they will comply;
Mr. Buller recommended modifyin Planning Condition No. 3 to include adjacent residents as well
as businesses. He also recommended modifying Planning Condition No. O for increased lighting
to be placed on the building for security purposes and to require a public review, if extended hours
of operation are desired beyond 10 p.m. Mr. Puller asked the applicant his plans regarding a
reach-in cooler being located in the window facing in and its appearance from the street.
Ms. Fong explained drywall, painted the same color as the outside of the building, will be placed
in that portion of the window to block the view of the back of the cooler,
Mr. Buller instructed Ms. Fong to resolve the matter:
Hearing no further public'comment, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional
Use Permit 97-08 with modifications to increase security lighting and limit the hours of operation
to 10 p.m., to be extended only upon an application for reconsideration.
City Planner Minutes 3 May 13, 1997
S. QO_N,QlTIQ,N?AL USE PERMIT 96-35 - LEWIS DEVELOPMEENI—QQ—MPANY - A request to
develop a 6,500 square foot commercial building with an existing commercial center in the
Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and
Carnelian Street -APN: 201-221-45.
Can Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report,
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Gary Bauer, Lewis Homes, 1461 Mountain Avenue, Upland, voiced his concerns regarding
Engineering Conditions No. 2 and 3, requiring the applicant to obtain a permit from Caltrans for
work within their right-of-way, in particular, the future Route 30 Freeway. He stated Lewis
Development Company will not be doing any work in Caltrans right-of-way and felt these items
should not be tied into a building permit issued by the City.
Mr, Coleman reported a possibility, based on comments made by Caltrans in the past, that it may
be necessary to acquire additional right-of-way, thus requiring a shift in the property line.
Mark Bertone, 10601 Church Street, Suite 107, Rancho Cucamonga, pointed out Planning
Condition No. 1 which, in part, states, "if the north property line shifts,.." and felt this wording more
equitable than attaching the condition to a building permit. He stated SAN BAG and Caltrans both
have reported the final design will not be completed for months.
Mr. Bauer indicated there had been a previous assumption that the property was inside Caltrans'
jurisdiction and Lewis Development was leasing the properly from Caltrans. He reported extensive
survey work and a title search which determined this is not the case. He stated that if Caitrans
were to approach Lewis Development and offer to buy the property at some future date, they would
drive a fairly reasonable bargain-, but Caltrans is not going to come in and just take it.
Mr, Buller asked if there is some way to re-word Engineering Conditions No. 2 and 3 to provide
consistency with Planning Condition No. 1.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated his intention to write a letter to Caltrans, giving them an
additional two-week time frame to respond before allowing the project to go forward without a
response. Mr. James stated past policy calls for right-of-way clearance prior to development,
Mr. Buller asked if all necessary street right-of-way clearance needed for Carnelian Street has been
obtained,
Mr. James stated there may be a need for some street right-of-way for slope purposes if re-grading
is necessary.
Mr. Bauer reported that Lewis Development has been approached only once over the years by
Caltrans to purchase the subject property. He stated Caltrans cannot arbitrarily take property and,
if a purchase, agreement cannot be reached, the property will then have to be acquired by eminent
domain.
Mr. Coleman indicated the applicant has already made several good faith contacts with Caltrans,.
City Planner Minutes 4 May 13, 1997
r. Bertone concurred, indicating a written response from Caltrans has been requested several
times. He reported a verbal response was given by Jeff Anderson, the BANBA representative,
"We can't give you an answer because we haven't designed that portion of Route 30 yet."
r. Buller asked what was specifically requested of Caltrans.
Mr. Bertone stated he requested Caltrans to tie down their right-of-way lane.
Mr. Bauer stated the condition places an extreme hardship on Lewis Development, affecting their
parking and leasable space" and said he does not see a scenario where Caltrans can come in and
arbitrarily take part of their building and property without some long-term negotiations, He reported
a 1 0-year lease has been signed with Blockbuster Video:
Mr. James reported the Route 30 Freeway is imminent, with a target date of operation by 2002,
r. Buller suggested modifying the condition to read. {"The applicant shall, in good faith, attempt
to receive comments from Caltrans regarding the future Route 30 Freeway. Resolution to any
written comments received shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a
building permit." He voiced his understanding of Engineering's position in trying to give Caltrans
the opportunity to determine whether or not right-of-way is needed, but he did not see a need to
hold up this project if Caltrans`has not yet determined their own needs.
Mr. Coleman reported the City has already sent the development plans to Caltrans for their review
and comments and they haven't responded in over two weeks,
Mr. James felt a few more weeks for a response from Caltrans is appropriate and agreed to make
another attempt to notify them;
r. Buller suggested continuing the item, He felt the Engineering Division should be given the
opportunity to complete its dialog with Caltrans regarding right-of-way. He asked Mr, dames for
direction regarding a continuance of the item for two weeks and whether he would be ready to
make a recommendation to delete the conditions if Caltrans does not respond within that time
frame.
Mr. James stated he had no problem with the recommended change.
Mr. Buller explained if he approves the Conditional Use Permit today with the existing conditions,
there will be a 1 g-day appeal period, thereby placing the project on hold until such time as Caltrans
responds,
Mr. Bauer indicated he did not wish to appeal to the Manning Commission. He felt the burden was
on the Engineering Division to solve the problem. He expressed his desire to continue the item to
May 21, 1997, and requested Mr. James contact Caltrans in the meantime and ask for a response.
Mr. James pointed out that even with full approvals a building permit cannot be issued for 10 days,
pending the plan check process.
Mr. Bauer voiced agreement:
City Planner Minutes 5 May 13, 199
Mr. Buller continued Conditional Use Permit -35 to May 27, 1997, to allow staff additional
opportunity to obtain a response from Caltrans,
PUBLIC ITT
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner mooting adjourned at 3-30 p.m.
Sincerely,
Y •
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Minutes 6 May 13, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM N A
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD AP IL 2 , "1997
CITE`` OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNERMINUTES
mob CITY OF RANCHOUCA CAA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING , 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
March 11, 100
Brad Buller; City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at :00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner, Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
. CONDITION& USE PERMIT 07-04 - HU HES MILLI EPA &$aQCIATE - A request to
establish a private martial arks studio in a leased space of 2,011 square feet of an existing
shopping center in the Village Commercial District of the victoria Planned Community,
located at 11306 Kenyon Way, Suite "G" - APN, 7-6 1-05. Related File: Use
Determination 06-04.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report:
Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
Sang Yun Lee, 1636 Delano Street„ Resew, agreed to the conditions set forth:
Alan Johnson, Hughes Investments, 13 Corporate Plaza #150, Newport each, mentioned their
requirements as landlord's prohibiting any type of outdoor activities, including demonstrations.
Mr. Buller asked if students or employees will be able to utilize the rear door access.
Mr. Johnson reported this location was chosen specifically for it's rear door access, which will be
used by instructors
Hearing no further comment, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use
Permit 07-0 ,
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 06- 3 - PAT 4 ELA_lNE HEIN - A request to construct a
second dwelling unit on 0.46 acres of land in the"Very Low Residential District (less than
dwelling units`per acre), located' at the northwest corner of Cottonwood Way and
Burgundy Avenue (9748 Cottonwood Way) -APN: 01-13 -13.
Brad Buller, City Planner, announced the receipt of three Getters of opposition; one dated February
7, 1997, and two others dated March g, 1997. He stated the first letter is a response by David and
Diane La Commare, indicating their concern regarding the Minor Exception,Permit granted by staff
in early February. He reported the letters received on March 10, 1997, were sent by Steven T.
Olsen and Dave and Lisa Watson, 1
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
r Buller asked if Mr. Grahn had any comment after reviewing the letters of opposition.
r. Grahn felt the request by the property owners to the north, with regard to lowering the pad to
allow for maintaining their view, had some validity. He reported speaking to Mrs. La Dommare just
minutes before this meeting and noted her continued opposition to the Conditional Use Permit
during the conversation.
Mr. Buller opened the public hearing,
Robert Laird; architect, 143 N. Harvard avenue, Suite F, Claremont, reported a meeting between
the La Commares and Heim the night before and felt all concerns had been addressed
satisfactorily.
Bat Hein, 97 Cottonwood Way, Rancho Cucamonga, reported meeting with the La Dommares
and sharing his plans for the proposed addition. He indicated the La Commares concerns included
north facing windows, lot placement, and roof line height:
r. Laird reported the lot had not been surveyed, estimating a four to six foot difference in pad
height between the existing house and the proposed structure, but felt the ridge height to be
similar.
Mr. Buller suggested a,goal of seeping the proposed structure as low as possible„ but also
explained the City does not preserve view corridors. He asked if the applicant intended to move
or relocate a shed in the back yard.
Mr. Hein stated it would probably be removed.
Mr. Buller asked what, from a designer's standpoint and keeping the lot size coverage in mind is
the intent to;screen the west-facing window and patio.
r. Laird indicated his awareness of the problem of lot size coverage and responded that trees will
be used.
Mr. Buller encouraged installation of a handicap accessible ramp and reminded the applicant of the
condition requiring the yard be landscaped in a professional manner. He recommended a block
wall be constructed along Burgundy,Avenue and the north property line.
Mr. Hein stated his intent is to probably go along with a block wall or some'tye of wall.
Mr. Buller did not recommend a wood fence. He asked if the applicant intends to use the same
type of concrete roof the as is used on the main house.
r. Hein answered in the affirmative,
r. Laird stated than the building pad could be lowered; however, it would require retaining of 1' to
feet of slope to the north, adjacent to the equistrian trail;
City Planner Meeting 2 March"11, 1997
r. Buller asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Dearing no response he closed
the public hearing. Mr. Buller stated he will not ask that the pad be lowered if the site line of the
proposed structure will be below the top of the roof of the primary structure from the perspective
of the resident's home to the north, He indicated a condition has been recommended which he
supports than states, should the use of the second dwelling become a problem to the neighborhood,
the matter shall be brought to the City Planner.
r. Buller then approved Conditional Use Permit 96-33, with modifications to add conditions
requiring the removal of the perimeter chain link fencing and replacement with a masonry/wrought
iron combination wall and directing the applicant to work with staff to lower the finish floor of the
proposed structure as low as reasonably feasible. He also asked that staff'insure landscaping is
consistent with the neighborhood,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
.There were no public comments,
ADJOURNMENT
The City Planner public Hearing adjourned at 2:22 p.m,
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 3 March 11, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 25, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary, Brad Buller, City Planner; Brent Le Count,
Associate Planner
ANNOUNCEAjE_NTS
None
MINUTES
January 7, 1997 minutes approved,
P* QQLIC HEARINGS
A. CONDITIONAI- Q 5E PER MIT 97-01 - CUTTING EDGE INDUSTRIES INC. - A request
to use an existing 9,747 square foot building for a box spring assembly and metal cutting
operation in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located at 8752 Industrial Lane -APN: 209-032-27.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report,
Brad Buffer, City Planner, opened the public hearing.
William Orloff, 8752 Industrial Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if chain link fencing with slats will
satisfy the condition requiring a solid wall fence. He felt a block wall would invite graffiti.
Gabriel Dalgoff, 8752 Industrial Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, indicated a block wall would not blend
with the surrounding businesses.
Mr. Buller pointed out the Industrial Area Specific Plan requires any yard area or outdoor storage
area be screened. He stated the current Planning Commission has never approved a chain link
fence with slats as a screening material. He noted the condition does not specify a masonry block
wall, but could be constructed using a variety of materials. He asked if irrigation is provided for the
area in front of the proposed solid wall fence,
Mr. Orloff responded irrigation is available in front of the building only,
Mr. Buller suggested the use of landscaping to act as a screen and buffer for any new walls along
the street..
Mr. Orloff asked if slats could be used on the existing chain link rolling gate.
Mr. Buller reported the Commission has not accepted slats in the past. He offered to have staff
provide the applicant with a variety of locations in the community where gate treatments have been
accepted. He indicated a flexibility in terms of the 180 day time-limit to satisfy the condition. He
reiterated the use of masonry concrete block wall is not specified in the condition, but whatever
treatment is chosen, it must be solid. He mentioned that utilization of greenery will act as a graffiti
deterrent. He cautioned the applicant that any outdoor storage must be screened.
Mr. Orloff asked the required procedure if outdoor storage is eventually needed.
Mr. Buller pointed out that the area could be used for storage, but must be screened per the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
Hearing no further comment, Mr. Buller closed the public hearing and approved Conditional Use
Permit 97-01.
EQJQLJQ,.!aQMMENTS
There were no public comments.
6DJO_URNMENI
The City Planner Public Hearing adjourned at 2:22 p.m.
Sincerely,
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary
City Planner Meeting 2 February 25, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CU AMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
O MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1997
ITS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
NO MEETING HELD JANUARY 2 , 97
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY PLANNER MINUTES
Regular Meeting
January 7, 1997
Brad Buller, City Planner, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Planner to order at 2:00 p,m. The meeting was held in the Planning Division Conference Room
at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
$IAFF PRESENT Tricia Ashby, Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner
None
INUT
November 12, 1996 minutes approved.
PUBLIC HEABINQa
A. CONQIT1QNAL_Q5E,RERMII N--31 -,R-QMA-N0SK1 -A request to establish an animal care
facility on an existing 0.5 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre) located at 6172 Celestite Avenue, APN: 1062-481-28,
Brad Buller, City Planner, indicted he had accepted the applicant's letter of withdrawal and
therefore, no action would be taken.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURN_MENT
The City Planner Public Hearing adjourned at 2:12 p.m.
Sincerely,
O-L'CL'C-
Tricia Ashby
Planning Division Secretary