The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2023/12/06 - Packet - Regular City Council MeetingCITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 1 Mayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Ashley Stickler CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA December 6, 2023 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION REGULAR MEETINGS TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909-774- 2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086. Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas. CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A.ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B.PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C.CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS Page 1 of 273 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 2 D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER STADIUM); AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: JOHN GILLISON AND ELISA COX, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTY: RANCHO BASEBALL LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. D/B/A ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO. CIVDS 1904713. (CITY) E. RECESS Page 2 of 273 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 3 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Ishaan Iyer for Being Named a 2023 3M Young Scientist Challenge Top 10 Finalist. B2. Presentation of Where Income Increased Most Year Over Year – 2023 Study. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed Page 3 of 273 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 4 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D.CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for Regular Meetings of November 15, 2023. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,382,944.13 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $11,812,958.97 Dated November 06, 2023, Through November 26, 2023, and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of October in the Total Amount of $1,735,255.46. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve Fire District Weekly Check Register for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $88.76 Dated November 06, 2023, Through November 26, 2023. (FIRE) D4. Consideration to Receive and File the AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023. (CITY) D5. Consideration of Appropriation in the Amount of $46,090 from the Citizen Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program State Fund Balance and Authorization to Purchase 12 Public Safety Video Network (PSVN) Cameras to Be Added to Or Replace End of Life Cameras at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. (CITY) D6. Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Civic Solutions for Contract Planning Services, to extend the contract through June 30, 2024, and increase the total contract cost by $122,150 to be funded from account 1001314-5300 and 1016301-5300 (Contract Services). (CITY) D7. Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fuel Equipment Services, Inc (DBA Fuel Serv) for Fuel Island Maintenance to Extend the Term of the Contract through June 30, 2024 in an Amount Not to Exceed $60,000 for FY 2023/2024. (CITY/FIRE) D8. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY) D9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the Southeast Corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court per Improvement Agreement, Related to Parcel Map 20098, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY) D10. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY) D11. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the East Side of East Avenue and South of Banyan Street per Improvement Agreement, Related to Tract Map 20334, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY) D12. Consideration to Approve the Final Map for Tract 20120, an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Resolutions Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R, and into Street Light Maintenance District No.1 and No.4, Located on the North Side of Foothill Boulevard and West of Milliken Avenue at 11290 Foothill Boulevard, Related to Case No’s. SUBTT20120 and DRC2021-00120. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-118), (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-119), AND (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-120) (CITY) Page 4 of 273 7 11 26 28 52 61 63 65 69 72 76 79 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 5 D13. Consideration of a Resolution Amending Parking Citation Penalties and Late Payment Penalties for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-116) (CITY) E.CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION F.ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G.ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1022, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Title 17 of The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Establishing Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail as a Use Permitted With a Minor Use Permit for Properties Located in Portions of the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zones, Amending Chapter 8.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Exempting Certain Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail from the Prohibition on Commercial Cannabis Activity; Adding Chapter 5.20 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Establishing Regulatory and Operational Restrictions for Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retailers. This Item is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(C)(2) and 15061(B)(3). (ORDINANCE NO. 1022) (CITY) G2. Public Hearing to Consider Establishing, Repealing, and Amending Certain Service and User Fee Adjustments for Various Departments (Building and Safety Services, Planning and Economic Development, and Community Services), Consider Amending the Transportation Development Impact Fees for Engineering Services, and Consider Two Resolutions Approving Such New Service and User Fees. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-121) and (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-122) (CITY) G3. Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Adopting and Approving the Issuance of Bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority in the Amount not to Exceed $12 Million to Improve and Rehab the Physical Condition of Pepperwood Apartments Located at 9055 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-117) (CITY) H.CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) I.COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. Consideration of City Council's Appointment of Their Respective Member to Cucamonga Valley Water District's Conservation Regulations Coalition. (CITY) I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J.CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K.IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L.ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 273 98 103 130 248 272 --- --- CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.” Page 6 CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 6 of 273 Smart Asset'sWhere Income Increased Most Year Over Year 2023 Study #3 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Key Findings Income grew by about 30%in 3 cities over just 1 year: 1.The Woodlands, TX (31.1%) 2.Palm Bay, FL (30.9%) 3.Rancho Cucamonga, CA (29.2%) The growth percentage is over three times the average median income growth (8.1%) across major cities. Median Income Growth $83,850 $108,345 2022 2021 Growth29.21% Supplemental Data •Bachelor’s Degree or higher increased by 3% •Highest brackets of household income increased by 5% •Manufacturing industry increased by 2% •48% of residents hold occupations in management, business, or finance Thank you! *DRAFT* November 15, 2023 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 4 November 15, 2023 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, November 15, 2023, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development and Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER STADIUM); AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: JOHN GILLISON AND ELISA COX, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTY: RANCHO BASEBALL LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND 020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION FOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (CITY) E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:01 p.m. Page 7 of 273 *DRAFT* November 15, 2023 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 4 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on November 15, 2023, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Hutchison led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Rancho Cucamonga’s 2023 Safest Cities Ranking. Rancho Cucamonga Chief of Police, Michael Smith and Lieutenant Jeffrey Allison provided a PowerPoint presentation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s rankings according to WalletHub’s rankings of the safest cities in America. According the 2023 Wallet Hub Report, Rancho Cucamonga ranked 51st overall out of 182 cities across the United States. In the Home and Community Safety Category, Rancho Cucamonga ranked 18th out of 182 cities, 4th in California and 1st in the Inland Empire. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Hector Mayorca, spoke about mental health and his concerns of the implementation timeline of the CARE Act in San Bernardino County. He expressed the urgent need of mental health programs and noted that other counties including Los Angeles and Riverside Counties will implement the CARE Act programs by December 1, 2023, while San Bernardino County will implement until December 1, 2024. City Manager Gillison referred Mr. Mayorca to Healthy RC staff for additional resources and programs offered by the City; and spoke on the State’s Care Act and implementation by phases. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Scott announced that she will need to abstain on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company. D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for Regular Meetings of November 1, 2023. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,164,669.96 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $3,680,885.31 Dated October 23, 2023, Through November 05, 2023. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $16,564.94 Dated October 23, 2023, Through November 05, 2023. (CITY/FIRE) Page 8 of 273 *DRAFT* November 15, 2023 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 4 D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of October 31, 2023 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration to Approve Office Lease Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for Office Space Located at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY) D6. Consideration to Approve a New Three-Year Contract with Spatialitics LLC in the amount of $190,840 for Analytics Software in Support of the Real Time Information Center for Public Safety. (CITY) D7. Consideration to Use the California Department of General Services Statewide Contract - Fleet Vehicles and Award the Purchase of Three Hybrid-Electric Toyota RAV4 Staff Vehicles in the amount of $102,640.00. (FIRE) D8. Consideration of Amendment No. 03 to Contract CO #2020-120 with Cambridge Seven Associates for Exhibit Design and Construction Administration Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $62,000, Consideration of Professional Services Agreement CO #19-140 with Aufbau Corporation for In-Field Construction Management Services in the Amount of $61,600, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $190,120 from the Library Capital Reserve Fund Balance. (CITY) D9. Consideration of a Request by Metrolink for a One-Time Set of Parking Permit Fee Waivers at the Cucamonga Station Located at 11208 Azusa Court for the Metrolink Holiday Express Train Event on December 2, 2023. (CITY) D10. Consideration of Final Maps of Tract Nos. 16072-3 and 16072, a Related Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Securities, Located North of Wilson Avenue Between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, Related to Case No. SUBTT16072. An Environmental Impact Report was Certified for This Project on June 16, 2004. (CITY) D11. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the 2022 Highway Safety Improvement Program Traffic Signal Modifications at Various Locations. (CITY) D12. Consideration of a Lot Line Adjustment for City -Owned Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive and a Resolution Dedicating a Portion of Discovery Drive from Haven Avenue to Approximately 445 Feet Westerly For Public U se. This Item is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to Sections 15305(a) and 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023- 115) (CITY) D13. Consideration to Adopt Resolutions Updating the Fiscal Year 2023 -24 City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Salary Schedules. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-113 AND RESOLUTION NO. FD2023-039) (CITY/FIRE) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda items D1 through D13, with Council Member/Board Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION None. Page 9 of 273 *DRAFT* November 15, 2023 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 4 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) None. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT None. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Consideration to Receive and File the First Quarter Financial Update for the Fiscal Year 2023/24 and to Approve Additional Appropriations in the Amount of $1,055,050. (CITY/FIRE) City Manager Gillison provided a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H1. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to receive and file the First Quarter Financial Update for the Fiscal Year 2023/24 and approve additional appropria tions as outlined in the report. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. I2. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 7:33 p.m. Approved: Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Page 10 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,382,944.13 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $11,812,958.97 Dated November 06, 2023, Through November 26, 2023, and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of October in the Total Amount of $1,735,255.46. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,286,472.38 and $1,096,471.75 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $10,151,509.07 and $1,661,449.90 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Electronic Debit Register amounts are $1,020,371.05 and $714,884.41 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Attachment 2 - Electronic Debit Register Page 11 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00016676 11/07/2023 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 15,837.58 0.00 15,837.58 AP 00016677 11/07/2023 ASSI SECURITY 43,346.25 0.00 43,346.25 AP 00016678 11/07/2023 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,638.07 0.00 1,638.07 AP 00016679 11/07/2023 FEHR & PEERS 5,712.50 0.00 5,712.50 AP 00016680 11/07/2023 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 4,537.73 0.00 4,537.73 ***AP 00016681 11/07/2023 NAPA AUTO PARTS 304.07 356.02 660.09 AP 00016682 11/07/2023 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 37,417.16 0.00 37,417.16 AP 00016683 11/07/2023 US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8,107.18 0.00 8,107.18 ***AP 00016684 11/07/2023 VALSOFT CORPORATION INC 11,448.00 11,448.00 22,896.00 AP 00016685 11/07/2023 YUNEX LLC 141,251.49 0.00 141,251.49 AP 00016686 11/15/2023 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 38,470.19 0.00 38,470.19 AP 00016687 11/15/2023 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 19,455.68 0.00 19,455.68 AP 00016688 11/15/2023 AMAZON WEB SERVICES INC 4,206.08 0.00 4,206.08 AP 00016689 11/15/2023 ASSI SECURITY 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00016690 11/15/2023 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 28,805.14 0.00 28,805.14 AP 00016691 11/15/2023 CENTRALSQUARE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1,560.00 0.00 1,560.00 AP 00016692 11/15/2023 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 40,349.35 0.00 40,349.35 AP 00016693 11/15/2023 FEHR & PEERS 397.50 0.00 397.50 AP 00016694 11/15/2023 ILAND INTERNET SOLUTIONS 19,336.99 0.00 19,336.99 AP 00016695 11/15/2023 RCCEA 1,467.75 0.00 1,467.75 AP 00016696 11/15/2023 RCPFA 13,482.27 0.00 13,482.27 AP 00016697 11/15/2023 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 4,132,008.00 0.00 4,132,008.00 AP 00016698 11/15/2023 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 632.00 0.00 632.00 AP 00016699 11/16/2023 GOLDEN SUN ENTERPRISE INC 337,379.87 0.00 337,379.87 AP 00016700 11/21/2023 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 7,117.50 7,117.50 AP 00016701 11/21/2023 BRINKS INCORPORATED 3,019.77 0.00 3,019.77 AP 00016702 11/21/2023 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 24,879.50 0.00 24,879.50 AP 00016703 11/21/2023 COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS LLC 135,835.00 0.00 135,835.00 AP 00016704 11/21/2023 FEHR & PEERS 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00016705 11/21/2023 MERRIMAC PETROLEUM INC 0.00 23,600.69 23,600.69 AP 00016706 11/21/2023 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC 16,928.50 0.00 16,928.50 AP 00016707 11/21/2023 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 82,072.84 0.00 82,072.84 AP 00016708 11/21/2023 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00016709 11/21/2023 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 43,735.00 0.00 43,735.00 AP 00016710 11/21/2023 YUNEX LLC 43,301.51 0.00 43,301.51 AP 00016711 11/21/2023 ZONES IT SOLUTIONS INC 16,878.03 0.00 16,878.03 AP 00016712 11/21/2023 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016713 11/21/2023 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00016714 11/21/2023 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 1,232.20 1,232.20 AP 00016715 11/21/2023 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00016716 11/21/2023 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016717 11/21/2023 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016718 11/21/2023 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016719 11/21/2023 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016720 11/21/2023 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016721 11/21/2023 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 132.25 132.25 AP 00016722 11/21/2023 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,205.32 1,205.32 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 12 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00016723 11/21/2023 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016724 11/21/2023 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 841.59 841.59 AP 00016725 11/21/2023 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,459.14 2,459.14 AP 00016726 11/21/2023 COX, KARL 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016727 11/21/2023 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016728 11/21/2023 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016729 11/21/2023 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016730 11/21/2023 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016731 11/21/2023 DAVENPORT, JAY 0.00 2,459.14 2,459.14 AP 00016732 11/21/2023 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 841.59 841.59 AP 00016733 11/21/2023 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00016734 11/21/2023 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016735 11/21/2023 EGGERS, ROBERT 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016736 11/21/2023 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,811.06 1,811.06 AP 00016737 11/21/2023 FRITCHEY, JOHN D 0.00 521.58 521.58 AP 00016738 11/21/2023 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016739 11/21/2023 HOLT, DANNY G 0.00 1,361.42 1,361.42 AP 00016740 11/21/2023 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00016741 11/21/2023 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,358.28 1,358.28 AP 00016742 11/21/2023 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,358.28 1,358.28 AP 00016743 11/21/2023 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 791.73 791.73 AP 00016744 11/21/2023 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016745 11/21/2023 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 603.64 603.64 AP 00016746 11/21/2023 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00016747 11/21/2023 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016748 11/21/2023 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,856.80 1,856.80 AP 00016749 11/21/2023 LONGO, JOE 0.00 132.25 132.25 AP 00016750 11/21/2023 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016751 11/21/2023 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 132.25 132.25 AP 00016752 11/21/2023 MAGNUSON, PETER 0.00 1,878.60 1,878.60 AP 00016753 11/21/2023 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016754 11/21/2023 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016755 11/21/2023 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016756 11/21/2023 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016757 11/21/2023 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,278.46 1,278.46 AP 00016758 11/21/2023 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,358.28 1,358.28 AP 00016759 11/21/2023 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016760 11/21/2023 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 132.25 132.25 AP 00016761 11/21/2023 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,429.73 2,429.73 AP 00016762 11/21/2023 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016763 11/21/2023 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016764 11/21/2023 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,856.80 1,856.80 AP 00016765 11/21/2023 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,261.61 1,261.61 AP 00016766 11/21/2023 REDMOND, MICHAEL 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016767 11/21/2023 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 852.90 852.90 AP 00016768 11/21/2023 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,459.14 2,459.14 AP 00016769 11/21/2023 ROEDER, JEFFREY 0.00 1,261.61 1,261.61 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 13 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00016770 11/21/2023 ROJER, IVAN M 0.00 1,811.06 1,811.06 AP 00016771 11/21/2023 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016772 11/21/2023 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016773 11/21/2023 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,272.92 1,272.92 AP 00016774 11/21/2023 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016775 11/21/2023 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 415.50 415.50 AP 00016776 11/21/2023 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016777 11/21/2023 TOLL, RICHARD 0.00 2,429.73 2,429.73 AP 00016778 11/21/2023 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,834.18 1,834.18 AP 00016779 11/21/2023 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016780 11/21/2023 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00016781 11/21/2023 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,392.71 1,392.71 AP 00016782 11/21/2023 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00441088 11/07/2023 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 329.64 0.00 329.64 AP 00441089 11/07/2023 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 124,366.64 124,366.64 AP 00441090 11/07/2023 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00441091 11/07/2023 ANTELOPE EXPANSION 3B LLC 15,208.28 0.00 15,208.28 AP 00441092 11/07/2023 ARCHIBALD FLOWERS 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00441093 11/07/2023 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00441094 11/07/2023 ARREGUIN, GABRIELLA 0.00 52.52 52.52 AP 00441095 11/07/2023 BOOT BARN INC 703.18 0.00 703.18 AP 00441096 11/07/2023 BOYD, PRESTON 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00441097 11/07/2023 BRAVO, WILBERTO 425.38 0.00 425.38 AP 00441098 11/07/2023 BW PRINTWORKS 0.00 616.92 616.92 AP 00441099 11/07/2023 C V W D 235.85 0.00 235.85 AP 00441100 11/07/2023 C V W D 0.00 876.06 876.06 AP 00441102 11/07/2023 C V W D 19,576.56 0.00 19,576.56 AP 00441103 11/07/2023 CAPITOL COMEDY 6,510.00 0.00 6,510.00 AP 00441104 11/07/2023 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 66,368.10 0.00 66,368.10 AP 00441105 11/07/2023 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 550.00 0.00 550.00 ***AP 00441106 11/07/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,415.49 6,168.94 10,584.43 AP 00441107 11/07/2023 CODE RED HEADSETS 1,541.04 0.00 1,541.04 AP 00441108 11/07/2023 COLLINS & COLLINS LLP 22,912.70 0.00 22,912.70 AP 00441109 11/07/2023 COUNTS UNLIMITED 630.00 0.00 630.00 AP 00441110 11/07/2023 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 5,392.08 0.00 5,392.08 AP 00441111 11/07/2023 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 245.00 245.00 AP 00441112 11/07/2023 DIAZ, AMANDA 168.29 0.00 168.29 AP 00441113 11/07/2023 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 295.54 0.00 295.54 AP 00441114 11/07/2023 ECONOLITE SYSTEMS INC 12,304.00 0.00 12,304.00 AP 00441115 11/07/2023 ECORP CONSULTING INC 0.00 540.00 540.00 AP 00441116 11/07/2023 FIALLOS, WILSON 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00441117 11/07/2023 FIRE SMART PROMOTIONS 0.00 3,023.73 3,023.73 AP 00441118 11/07/2023 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 1,474.67 1,474.67 AP 00441119 11/07/2023 FRITTS FORD 87,016.88 0.00 87,016.88 ***AP 00441120 11/07/2023 FRONTIER COMM 1,525.79 465.18 1,990.97 AP 00441121 11/07/2023 GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING INC 20,352.00 0.00 20,352.00 AP 00441122 11/07/2023 GLOBALSTAR USA 180.14 0.00 180.14 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 14 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441123 11/07/2023 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00441124 11/07/2023 GRAINGER 1,080.55 0.00 1,080.55 AP 00441125 11/07/2023 GRAVES & KING LLP 9,917.35 0.00 9,917.35 AP 00441126 11/07/2023 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 2,608.69 0.00 2,608.69 AP 00441127 11/07/2023 GUTIERREZ, CYNTHIA 138.50 0.00 138.50 AP 00441128 11/07/2023 HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES INC 401.59 0.00 401.59 AP 00441129 11/07/2023 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 974.06 0.00 974.06 AP 00441130 11/07/2023 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 107.00 0.00 107.00 AP 00441131 11/07/2023 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 5.34 0.00 5.34 AP 00441132 11/07/2023 INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 AP 00441133 11/07/2023 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 912.00 0.00 912.00 AP 00441134 11/07/2023 INLAND VALLEY REPERTORY THEATRE 66,370.59 0.00 66,370.59 AP 00441135 11/07/2023 ITRON INC 11,681.76 0.00 11,681.76 AP 00441136 11/07/2023 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00441137 11/07/2023 KAUDZE, EVANGELINA 12.81 0.00 12.81 AP 00441138 11/07/2023 KIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER 3,651.96 0.00 3,651.96 AP 00441139 11/07/2023 KRIVAN, KAITLYN 150.35 0.00 150.35 AP 00441140 11/07/2023 LIBRARY JOURNALS LLC 179.00 0.00 179.00 AP 00441141 11/07/2023 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 12,836.00 0.00 12,836.00 AP 00441142 11/07/2023 MABRY, JONATHAN E 244.03 0.00 244.03 AP 00441143 11/07/2023 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 13,218.75 0.00 13,218.75 AP 00441144 11/07/2023 MAIN STREET SIGNS 2,444.43 0.00 2,444.43 AP 00441145 11/07/2023 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 304,298.07 0.00 304,298.07 AP 00441146 11/07/2023 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00441147 11/07/2023 MCFADDEN-DALE HARDWARE 68.95 0.00 68.95 AP 00441148 11/07/2023 MCI 35.32 0.00 35.32 AP 00441149 11/07/2023 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 86.47 0.00 86.47 AP 00441150 11/07/2023 MERRIMAC PETROLEUM INC 33,869.32 0.00 33,869.32 ***AP 00441151 11/07/2023 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 22,538.84 2,990.00 25,528.84 AP 00441152 11/07/2023 MEYER, JESSECA 148.44 0.00 148.44 AP 00441153 11/07/2023 MITCHELL, RYAN 49.67 0.00 49.67 AP 00441154 11/07/2023 MOE, JOHN 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00441155 11/07/2023 MOISA, DANIEL A 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00441156 11/07/2023 MORALES, ROBERT 99.00 0.00 99.00 AP 00441157 11/07/2023 MR T'S TOWING INC 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00441158 11/07/2023 MWI ANIMAL HEALTH 262.25 0.00 262.25 AP 00441159 11/07/2023 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 ***AP 00441160 11/07/2023 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA 164.00 7,498.00 7,662.00 AP 00441161 11/07/2023 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 2,143.27 0.00 2,143.27 AP 00441162 11/07/2023 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 157.50 0.00 157.50 AP 00441163 11/07/2023 ONTARIO SPAY & NEUTER INC 2,900.00 0.00 2,900.00 AP 00441164 11/07/2023 OTT, SHARON 1,338.00 0.00 1,338.00 AP 00441165 11/07/2023 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00441166 11/07/2023 POLARIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION 755.23 0.00 755.23 AP 00441167 11/07/2023 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS INC 0.00 6,073.39 6,073.39 AP 00441168 11/07/2023 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 1,984.68 0.00 1,984.68 AP 00441169 11/07/2023 PSA PRINT GROUP 58.88 0.00 58.88 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 15 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441170 11/07/2023 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 49.95 0.00 49.95 AP 00441171 11/07/2023 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 901.88 0.00 901.88 AP 00441172 11/07/2023 REIMER, RANDY 76.90 0.00 76.90 AP 00441173 11/07/2023 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 1,086.05 0.00 1,086.05 AP 00441174 11/07/2023 ROBERT A DAHLSTEIN 338.00 0.00 338.00 AP 00441175 11/07/2023 SAN BERNARDINO CNTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST 67,874.90 0.00 67,874.90 AP 00441176 11/07/2023 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 12,391.26 12,391.26 AP 00441177 11/07/2023 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 7,016.00 0.00 7,016.00 AP 00441178 11/07/2023 SELECT DETAILING PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 399.75 399.75 AP 00441179 11/07/2023 SHRED PROS 180.00 0.00 180.00 ***AP 00441180 11/07/2023 SIDEPATH INC 1,299,952.21 1,299,952.20 2,599,904.41 AP 00441181 11/07/2023 SIGURDSON, JADE MICHAEL ANNE 1,260.00 0.00 1,260.00 AP 00441182 11/07/2023 SOARES AUTOMOTIVE INC 35,211.31 0.00 35,211.31 AP 00441183 11/07/2023 SOUTH COAST AQMD 597.00 0.00 597.00 ***AP 00441185 11/07/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,232.83 3,413.01 22,645.84 ***AP 00441186 11/07/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,128.85 2,633.99 3,762.84 AP 00441187 11/07/2023 SPECTRUM GAS PRODUCTS 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00441188 11/07/2023 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 224.88 0.00 224.88 AP 00441189 11/07/2023 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 510.69 0.00 510.69 AP 00441190 11/07/2023 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 1,678.00 0.00 1,678.00 ***AP 00441191 11/07/2023 TRIDEN GROUP CORP 7,325.00 7,325.00 14,650.00 AP 00441192 11/07/2023 ULINE 112.18 0.00 112.18 AP 00441193 11/07/2023 UPTON, MARTIN 52.87 0.00 52.87 AP 00441194 11/07/2023 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4,562.70 0.00 4,562.70 AP 00441195 11/07/2023 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 6,135.02 6,135.02 AP 00441196 11/07/2023 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 168.92 0.00 168.92 AP 00441197 11/07/2023 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00441198 11/07/2023 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 112.08 0.00 112.08 AP 00441199 11/07/2023 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 885.33 0.00 885.33 AP 00441200 11/07/2023 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6,972.82 0.00 6,972.82 AP 00441201 11/07/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 585.00 0.00 585.00 AP 00441202 11/07/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 15,611.10 0.00 15,611.10 AP 00441203 11/07/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 16,205.60 0.00 16,205.60 AP 00441204 11/07/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 17,169.70 0.00 17,169.70 AP 00441205 11/07/2023 WEST COAST SAND & GRAVEL INC 1,579.70 0.00 1,579.70 AP 00441206 11/07/2023 WESTBOUND COMMUNICATIONS INC 18,593.06 0.00 18,593.06 AP 00441207 11/07/2023 WESTBOUND COMMUNICATIONS INC 18,596.24 0.00 18,596.24 AP 00441208 11/07/2023 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 441.78 0.00 441.78 AP 00441209 11/07/2023 WILDE, SHELBY 35.54 0.00 35.54 AP 00441210 11/15/2023 ABDALLAH, AHMAD 65.85 0.00 65.85 AP 00441211 11/15/2023 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT CO INC 346.98 0.00 346.98 AP 00441212 11/15/2023 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 2,798.50 0.00 2,798.50 AP 00441213 11/15/2023 AERO FRESH HEATING & AC 975.30 0.00 975.30 AP 00441214 11/15/2023 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 440.70 440.70 AP 00441215 11/15/2023 ALDO SHOES 329.56 0.00 329.56 AP 00441216 11/15/2023 ALPHAGRAPHICS 393.96 0.00 393.96 AP 00441217 11/15/2023 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 225.00 0.00 225.00 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 16 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441218 11/15/2023 ANIMAL HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC CENTER 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00441219 11/15/2023 AQUINO, PAUL 60.61 0.00 60.61 AP 00441220 11/15/2023 AUFBAU CORPORATION 21,128.00 0.00 21,128.00 AP 00441221 11/15/2023 AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC 0.00 5,153.02 5,153.02 AP 00441222 11/15/2023 AVENUEWEST SACRAMENTO 75.72 0.00 75.72 AP 00441223 11/15/2023 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 534.25 534.25 AP 00441224 11/15/2023 BASE LINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00441225 11/15/2023 BEST OUTDOOR POWER INLAND LLC 719.02 0.00 719.02 AP 00441226 11/15/2023 BOB'S MUFFLER SHOP 226.93 0.00 226.93 AP 00441227 11/15/2023 BOUKARROU, LATIFA 49.99 0.00 49.99 AP 00441228 11/15/2023 BRIGHT PLANET SOLAR 67.86 0.00 67.86 AP 00441229 11/15/2023 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 60,332.92 0.00 60,332.92 AP 00441230 11/15/2023 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES INC 6,452.89 0.00 6,452.89 AP 00441231 11/15/2023 C V W D 206.03 0.00 206.03 ***AP 00441235 11/15/2023 C V W D 50,111.11 7.59 50,118.70 AP 00441236 11/15/2023 CACEO 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00441237 11/15/2023 CALIF UNDERGROUND FAC SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD 48.82 0.00 48.82 AP 00441238 11/15/2023 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00441239 11/15/2023 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 1,494.50 0.00 1,494.50 AP 00441240 11/15/2023 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP 3,950.72 0.00 3,950.72 AP 00441241 11/15/2023 CASHMANS INC 9,640.59 0.00 9,640.59 AP 00441242 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441243 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441244 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441245 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441246 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441247 11/15/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441248 11/15/2023 CLEAN STATE GROUP LLC 6,920.00 0.00 6,920.00 AP 00441249 11/15/2023 COAST FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 379.81 0.00 379.81 AP 00441250 11/15/2023 CONTINENTAL GIRBAU WEST LLC 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00441251 11/15/2023 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 78.44 0.00 78.44 AP 00441252 11/15/2023 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 280.69 0.00 280.69 AP 00441253 11/15/2023 COX, ELISA 25.97 0.00 25.97 AP 00441254 11/15/2023 CROWN CASTLE 1,519.00 0.00 1,519.00 AP 00441255 11/15/2023 CROWN CASTLE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441256 11/15/2023 CROWN CASTLE 446.00 0.00 446.00 AP 00441257 11/15/2023 CROWN CASTLE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441258 11/15/2023 DAISYECO INC 388.14 0.00 388.14 AP 00441259 11/15/2023 DAKTRONICS INC 174,946.24 0.00 174,946.24 AP 00441260 11/15/2023 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 37.50 0.00 37.50 AP 00441261 11/15/2023 DICUS SHERIFF-CORONER, SHANNON D 232.90 0.00 232.90 AP 00441262 11/15/2023 DINTERMAN, TERESA 325.10 0.00 325.10 AP 00441263 11/15/2023 DIRECTV 246.39 0.00 246.39 AP 00441264 11/15/2023 DMV RENEWAL 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00441265 11/15/2023 ENERGUY, THE 2,194.38 0.00 2,194.38 AP 00441266 11/15/2023 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 840.00 840.00 AP 00441267 11/15/2023 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 420.05 420.05 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 17 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441268 11/15/2023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 39.46 0.00 39.46 AP 00441269 11/15/2023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 67.66 0.00 67.66 AP 00441270 11/15/2023 FLAG SYSTEMS INC 2,100.00 0.00 2,100.00 AP 00441271 11/15/2023 FOLKENS, KIMBERLI 941.04 0.00 941.04 AP 00441272 11/15/2023 FORD, BRIANNA 21.75 0.00 21.75 AP 00441273 11/15/2023 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS INC 0.00 335.60 335.60 AP 00441274 11/15/2023 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 120.79 0.00 120.79 AP 00441275 11/15/2023 GARCIA, JUSTINE 160.48 0.00 160.48 AP 00441276 11/15/2023 GAREE, JOHN 76.93 0.00 76.93 AP 00441277 11/15/2023 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 ***AP 00441278 11/15/2023 GRAINGER 1,055.98 227.98 1,283.96 AP 00441279 11/15/2023 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 2,731.47 0.00 2,731.47 AP 00441280 11/15/2023 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 2,573.66 0.00 2,573.66 AP 00441281 11/15/2023 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,227.01 0.00 1,227.01 AP 00441282 11/15/2023 HCI ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SVC 38,734.98 0.00 38,734.98 AP 00441283 11/15/2023 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,342.28 0.00 1,342.28 AP 00441284 11/15/2023 HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES INC 329.61 0.00 329.61 AP 00441285 11/15/2023 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 29,884.35 0.00 29,884.35 AP 00441286 11/15/2023 HO, BRENDA 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00441287 11/15/2023 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 647.04 0.00 647.04 AP 00441288 11/15/2023 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 55,553.50 0.00 55,553.50 AP 00441289 11/15/2023 ICE & HOT HVAC AIR CONDITION INC 724.92 0.00 724.92 AP 00441290 11/15/2023 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 3,891.72 0.00 3,891.72 AP 00441291 11/15/2023 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 225.00 225.00 AP 00441292 11/15/2023 INNOCENTI, KAREN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00441293 11/15/2023 IPERMIT 2,759.52 0.00 2,759.52 AP 00441294 11/15/2023 JACKSON-HIRSH INC 230.54 0.00 230.54 AP 00441295 11/15/2023 JAVA CONNECTIONS LLC 11,620.84 0.00 11,620.84 AP 00441296 11/15/2023 JONES, DENISE 39.50 0.00 39.50 AP 00441297 11/15/2023 KANG, YOON 81.62 0.00 81.62 AP 00441298 11/15/2023 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 1,120.00 0.00 1,120.00 AP 00441299 11/15/2023 KINDRED CORPORATION, THE 314.63 0.00 314.63 AP 00441300 11/15/2023 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 128.44 0.00 128.44 AP 00441301 11/15/2023 KVL TIRES INC 1,432.61 0.00 1,432.61 AP 00441302 11/15/2023 KVL TIRES INC 2,922.32 0.00 2,922.32 AP 00441303 11/15/2023 LETU, WILLIAM 61.38 0.00 61.38 AP 00441304 11/15/2023 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 4,175.19 0.00 4,175.19 AP 00441305 11/15/2023 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 950.00 0.00 950.00 AP 00441306 11/15/2023 LUETTGERODT, ALAN 84.00 0.00 84.00 AP 00441307 11/15/2023 LUXURY NAILS & SPA 390.20 0.00 390.20 ***AP 00441308 11/15/2023 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 329,778.46 9,164.50 338,942.96 AP 00441309 11/15/2023 MARTINEZ, JOSEFINA 42.04 0.00 42.04 AP 00441310 11/15/2023 MCFADDEN-DALE HARDWARE 75.04 0.00 75.04 AP 00441311 11/15/2023 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES LP 7,947.64 0.00 7,947.64 AP 00441312 11/15/2023 MERRIMAC PETROLEUM INC 3,130.57 0.00 3,130.57 AP 00441313 11/15/2023 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 2,630.00 0.00 2,630.00 AP 00441314 11/15/2023 MIDWEST VETERINARY SUPPLY INC 707.85 0.00 707.85 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 18 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441315 11/15/2023 MINUTEMAN PRESS 0.00 154.17 154.17 AP 00441316 11/15/2023 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 1,277.60 1,277.60 AP 00441317 11/15/2023 MWG ELECTRIC 2,658.04 0.00 2,658.04 AP 00441318 11/15/2023 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00441319 11/15/2023 NBS 3,400.00 0.00 3,400.00 AP 00441320 11/15/2023 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 2,071.17 0.00 2,071.17 AP 00441321 11/15/2023 NICK'S CUSTOM BOOTS LLC 0.00 211.15 211.15 ***AP 00441323 11/15/2023 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 5,256.14 1,931.01 7,187.15 AP 00441324 11/15/2023 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00441325 11/15/2023 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 449,895.00 0.00 449,895.00 AP 00441326 11/15/2023 PLACEWORKS 1,101.60 0.00 1,101.60 AP 00441327 11/15/2023 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 53.36 0.00 53.36 AP 00441328 11/15/2023 PURPLE XPERIENCE LLC 5,918.00 0.00 5,918.00 AP 00441329 11/15/2023 QUAN, JENNIFER 30.28 0.00 30.28 AP 00441330 11/15/2023 R C EMPLOYEE ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 17,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 AP 00441331 11/15/2023 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,174.00 0.00 3,174.00 AP 00441332 11/15/2023 RANCHO WEST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441333 11/15/2023 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 6,324.18 0.00 6,324.18 AP 00441334 11/15/2023 RECYCLE AWAY LLC 1,570.05 0.00 1,570.05 AP 00441335 11/15/2023 REESE, JOHNNY 69.77 0.00 69.77 AP 00441336 11/15/2023 RIALTO ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00441337 11/15/2023 RODRIGUEZ, DESTINY 39.55 0.00 39.55 AP 00441338 11/15/2023 ROSE BRAND WIPERS INC 369.30 0.00 369.30 AP 00441339 11/15/2023 ROSENBAUER, CONSTANTIN 337.00 0.00 337.00 AP 00441340 11/15/2023 SAYEGH, ANTHONY 76.74 0.00 76.74 AP 00441341 11/15/2023 SBPEA 2,521.65 0.00 2,521.65 AP 00441342 11/15/2023 SELECT HOME IMPROVEMENTS 2,425.68 0.00 2,425.68 AP 00441343 11/15/2023 SIGN SHOP, THE 84.05 0.00 84.05 AP 00441344 11/15/2023 SOLORIO, KIMBERLY 73.36 0.00 73.36 AP 00441345 11/15/2023 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 528.16 0.00 528.16 ***AP 00441348 11/15/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120,384.59 1,231.18 121,615.77 AP 00441349 11/15/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 462.04 0.00 462.04 AP 00441350 11/15/2023 SOVIC CREATIVE 8,013.62 0.00 8,013.62 AP 00441351 11/15/2023 SPECIALTY FILM & PACKAGING INC 2,101.13 0.00 2,101.13 AP 00441352 11/15/2023 STEIMLE, QUINTON 715.56 0.00 715.56 AP 00441353 11/15/2023 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 667.67 0.00 667.67 AP 00441354 11/15/2023 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00441355 11/15/2023 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 953.32 0.00 953.32 AP 00441356 11/15/2023 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 380.00 0.00 380.00 AP 00441357 11/15/2023 TOLL ROADS VIOLATIONS DEPT, THE 121.71 0.00 121.71 AP 00441358 11/15/2023 TOWILL INC 4,445.00 0.00 4,445.00 AP 00441359 11/15/2023 TOWN, ALLISON 14.00 0.00 14.00 AP 00441360 11/15/2023 TSAI FONG BOOKS INC 574.11 0.00 574.11 AP 00441361 11/15/2023 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 18,619.24 0.00 18,619.24 AP 00441362 11/15/2023 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 11,990.65 0.00 11,990.65 AP 00441363 11/15/2023 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,144.38 0.00 1,144.38 AP 00441364 11/15/2023 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,144.38 0.00 1,144.38 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:8 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 19 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441365 11/15/2023 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00441366 11/15/2023 ULTIMATE INTERNET ACCESS INC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441367 11/15/2023 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT/SC 127.25 0.00 127.25 AP 00441368 11/15/2023 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 551.09 0.00 551.09 AP 00441369 11/15/2023 UPS 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00441370 11/15/2023 US POSTAL SERVICE 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00441371 11/15/2023 VALENZUELA, JOHN 0.00 400.00 400.00 AP 00441372 11/15/2023 VALERY, JOSEPH 87.95 0.00 87.95 AP 00441373 11/15/2023 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 1,069.29 1,069.29 AP 00441374 11/15/2023 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00441375 11/15/2023 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 0.00 4,356.44 4,356.44 AP 00441376 11/15/2023 VENETRICS INC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 AP 00441377 11/15/2023 VERA, CARA 38.81 0.00 38.81 AP 00441378 11/15/2023 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 252.34 0.00 252.34 AP 00441379 11/15/2023 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 3,468.16 0.00 3,468.16 AP 00441380 11/15/2023 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441381 11/15/2023 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 4,927.27 0.00 4,927.27 AP 00441382 11/15/2023 VISTA PAINT 690.83 0.00 690.83 AP 00441383 11/15/2023 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 342.36 0.00 342.36 AP 00441384 11/15/2023 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0.00 2,662.21 2,662.21 AP 00441385 11/15/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 839.15 0.00 839.15 AP 00441386 11/15/2023 WU, HSINMEI 92.30 0.00 92.30 AP 00441387 11/15/2023 WYRICK, GAVAN JAMES 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00441388 11/15/2023 YAO, GUOQIN 206.30 0.00 206.30 AP 00441389 11/15/2023 YNIGUEZ, TRACY 87.15 0.00 87.15 AP 00441390 11/15/2023 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 705.60 0.00 705.60 AP 00441391 11/15/2023 YU, JOANNA 63.04 0.00 63.04 AP 00441392 11/15/2023 ZOETIS US LLC 492.97 0.00 492.97 AP 00441393 11/21/2023 49ER COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.00 760.00 760.00 AP 00441394 11/21/2023 A TO Z DATABASES 5,320.00 0.00 5,320.00 AP 00441395 11/21/2023 ABOUND FOOD CARE 1,292.59 0.00 1,292.59 AP 00441396 11/21/2023 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT CO INC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00441397 11/21/2023 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00441398 11/21/2023 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 232.74 0.00 232.74 AP 00441399 11/21/2023 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 1,043.88 1,043.88 AP 00441400 11/21/2023 AMIGOS LIBRARY SERVICES 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00441401 11/21/2023 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 153.00 0.00 153.00 AP 00441402 11/21/2023 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 41,646.23 0.00 41,646.23 AP 00441403 11/21/2023 ASSAF, IBRAHIM 91.53 0.00 91.53 AP 00441404 11/21/2023 AVILA, JOSE 32.28 0.00 32.28 AP 00441405 11/21/2023 BAKAS, EVANGELOS 14.33 0.00 14.33 AP 00441406 11/21/2023 BAUER COMPRESSORS INC 0.00 4,297.52 4,297.52 AP 00441407 11/21/2023 BEST OUTDOOR POWER INLAND LLC 140.01 0.00 140.01 AP 00441408 11/21/2023 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 11,709.69 0.00 11,709.69 AP 00441409 11/21/2023 BISEK, DAWN TRICHE 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00441410 11/21/2023 BOOT BARN INC 555.00 0.00 555.00 AP 00441411 11/21/2023 BRAUN BLAISING & WYNNE PC 662.63 0.00 662.63 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:9 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 20 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441412 11/21/2023 BROWN, STEVE 0.00 411.70 411.70 AP 00441413 11/21/2023 C T & T CONCRETE PAVING INC 505,117.85 0.00 505,117.85 ***AP 00441414 11/21/2023 C V W D 1,210.91 665.59 1,876.50 AP 00441415 11/21/2023 CAL FIRE 0.00 600.00 600.00 AP 00441416 11/21/2023 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441417 11/21/2023 CITY RENTALS 977.76 0.00 977.76 AP 00441418 11/21/2023 COMPUTERIZED EMBROIDERY COMPANY 0.00 2,379.12 2,379.12 AP 00441419 11/21/2023 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00441420 11/21/2023 CROWN CASTLE 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441421 11/21/2023 DAN'S LAWNMOWER CENTER 0.00 429.18 429.18 AP 00441422 11/21/2023 DENG, QINGFENG 495.00 0.00 495.00 AP 00441423 11/21/2023 DICUS SHERIFF-CORONER, SHANNON D 97.20 0.00 97.20 AP 00441424 11/21/2023 DIRECTV 40.65 0.00 40.65 AP 00441425 11/21/2023 DOG WASTE DEPOT 3,949.99 0.00 3,949.99 AP 00441426 11/21/2023 DOIGE, LUIGI 130.88 0.00 130.88 AP 00441427 11/21/2023 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS INC 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 AP 00441428 11/21/2023 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 0.00 6,532.01 6,532.01 AP 00441429 11/21/2023 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 320.00 320.00 AP 00441430 11/21/2023 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 36.57 36.57 AP 00441431 11/21/2023 FIALLOS, WILSON 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00441432 11/21/2023 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 478.67 478.67 AP 00441433 11/21/2023 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 297.42 297.42 AP 00441434 11/21/2023 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 423.82 423.82 AP 00441435 11/21/2023 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441436 11/21/2023 GARCIA, ELDRICK 92.75 0.00 92.75 AP 00441437 11/21/2023 GARCIA, PETRA 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00441438 11/21/2023 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY & CREMATORY 705.00 0.00 705.00 AP 00441439 11/21/2023 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00441440 11/21/2023 HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES INC 644.63 0.00 644.63 AP 00441441 11/21/2023 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 196.11 0.00 196.11 AP 00441442 11/21/2023 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 985.00 0.00 985.00 AP 00441443 11/21/2023 ICMA 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00441444 11/21/2023 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 402.62 0.00 402.62 AP 00441445 11/21/2023 INYO NETWORKS INC 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50 AP 00441446 11/21/2023 JDRS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 96.12 0.00 96.12 AP 00441447 11/21/2023 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 4,416.60 0.00 4,416.60 AP 00441448 11/21/2023 KINGDOM CALIBRATIONS INC 0.00 888.68 888.68 AP 00441449 11/21/2023 KOLA-FM 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441450 11/21/2023 LE, HUYEN 60.78 0.00 60.78 AP 00441451 11/21/2023 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 158.16 158.16 AP 00441452 11/21/2023 LN CURTIS & SONS 0.00 3,082.25 3,082.25 AP 00441453 11/21/2023 MAGSOMBOL, AISA 0.20 0.00 0.20 AP 00441454 11/21/2023 MANNS, KEISHA CURIEL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441455 11/21/2023 MARTINEZ, CINTHIA 7.67 0.00 7.67 AP 00441456 11/21/2023 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00441457 11/21/2023 MIDWEST VETERINARY SUPPLY INC 24.91 0.00 24.91 AP 00441458 11/21/2023 MIG INC 7,192.50 0.00 7,192.50 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:10 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 21 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441459 11/21/2023 MITCHELL, JUSTIN 29.43 0.00 29.43 AP 00441460 11/21/2023 MOLINA, EUGENIA 0.00 106.12 106.12 AP 00441461 11/21/2023 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC 0.00 2,043.63 2,043.63 AP 00441462 11/21/2023 MWI ANIMAL HEALTH 154.76 0.00 154.76 AP 00441463 11/21/2023 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 1,719.62 0.00 1,719.62 AP 00441464 11/21/2023 OLSON, BUZZ 0.00 320.00 320.00 AP 00441465 11/21/2023 ON TIME MOVING SERVICES INC 19,990.00 0.00 19,990.00 AP 00441466 11/21/2023 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00441467 11/21/2023 ONWARD ENGINEERING 4,680.00 0.00 4,680.00 AP 00441468 11/21/2023 PHIFER, TIFFANY 34.55 0.00 34.55 AP 00441469 11/21/2023 PICHETTO, DEBRA 26.00 0.00 26.00 AP 00441470 11/21/2023 PLACEWORKS 72,620.75 0.00 72,620.75 AP 00441471 11/21/2023 PRC 123.49 0.00 123.49 AP 00441472 11/21/2023 PSA PRINT GROUP 48.10 0.00 48.10 AP 00441473 11/21/2023 SAM'S CLUB / SYNCHRONY BANK 1,487.16 0.00 1,487.16 AP 00441474 11/21/2023 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 12,747.31 0.00 12,747.31 AP 00441475 11/21/2023 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,216.72 0.00 15,216.72 AP 00441476 11/21/2023 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 828.90 0.00 828.90 AP 00441477 11/21/2023 SAN DIEGO OFFICE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00441478 11/21/2023 SDI PRESENCE LLC 28,120.00 0.00 28,120.00 AP 00441479 11/21/2023 SHELL, MARYANN 8.00 0.00 8.00 AP 00441480 11/21/2023 SHRED PROS 1,003.00 0.00 1,003.00 AP 00441481 11/21/2023 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 107.75 107.75 AP 00441482 11/21/2023 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 3,312.88 0.00 3,312.88 AP 00441483 11/21/2023 SKYLINE SAFETY & SUPPLY 644.87 0.00 644.87 AP 00441484 11/21/2023 SKYZONE INC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00441486 11/21/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,271.37 0.00 5,271.37 AP 00441487 11/21/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00441488 11/21/2023 SOWLES, JULIE 1,925.36 0.00 1,925.36 ***AP 00441489 11/21/2023 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 2,150.00 810.00 2,960.00 AP 00441490 11/21/2023 SYNERGY COMPANIES 1,006.76 0.00 1,006.76 AP 00441491 11/21/2023 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00441492 11/21/2023 TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00441493 11/21/2023 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS INC 1,925.00 0.00 1,925.00 AP 00441494 11/21/2023 ULINE 371.61 0.00 371.61 AP 00441495 11/21/2023 ULTIMATE INTERNET ACCESS INC 12,806.00 0.00 12,806.00 AP 00441496 11/21/2023 ULTIMATE INTERNET ACCESS INC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00441497 11/21/2023 UPS 79.57 0.00 79.57 AP 00441498 11/21/2023 VERIZON 44.01 0.00 44.01 AP 00441499 11/21/2023 VERIZON BUSINESS 40.25 0.00 40.25 AP 00441500 11/21/2023 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6,401.50 0.00 6,401.50 AP 00441501 11/21/2023 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 1,236.69 0.00 1,236.69 AP 00441502 11/21/2023 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00441503 11/21/2023 VSA INC 5,824.00 0.00 5,824.00 AP 00441504 11/21/2023 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 228.24 0.00 228.24 AP 00441505 11/21/2023 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 169.86 0.00 169.86 AP 00441506 11/21/2023 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,551.26 0.00 3,551.26 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:11 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 22 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441507 11/21/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 4,647.50 0.00 4,647.50 AP 00441508 11/21/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 1,105.50 0.00 1,105.50 AP 00441509 11/21/2023 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 2,237.80 0.00 2,237.80 AP 00441510 11/21/2023 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 0.00 305.55 305.55 AP 00441511 11/21/2023 WILLIAM VASTA PHOTOGRAPHY 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00441512 11/21/2023 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 1,989.81 0.00 1,989.81 AP 00441513 11/21/2023 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 186.64 186.64 AP 00441514 11/21/2023 WORK BOOT WAREHOUSE 355.00 0.00 355.00 AP 00441515 11/21/2023 XIBITZ INC 116,836.15 0.00 116,836.15 AP 00441516 11/21/2023 ZBINDEN, JONATHAN 0.00 320.00 320.00 AP 00441517 11/21/2023 DOMINICK, CHARLENE 0.00 269.02 269.02 AP 00441518 11/21/2023 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 689.04 689.04 AP 00441519 11/21/2023 SPAGNOLO, VIOLA 0.00 262.59 262.59 AP 00441520 11/21/2023 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 269.02 269.02 ***AP 00441522 11/22/2023 CALIF DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 2,095.48 208.86 2,304.34 $10,151,509.07 $11,812,958.97 $1,661,449.90 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 07:28:56 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:12 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 23 of 273 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 10/2 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment 98,267.19 52,003.01 150,270.20 10/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,532.99 2,532.99 10/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,089.42 2,089.42 10/3 Bank Fee 105.45 105.45 10/3 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 322.42 322.42 10/3 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 245.50 245.50 10/3 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 41,730.00 41,730.00 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 103,727.22 103,727.22 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 55,037.55 55,037.55 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 11,945.51 11,945.51 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,068.65 6,068.65 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,042.25 3,042.25 10/4 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,748.16 2,748.16 10/4 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 153.14 153.14 10/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,781.68 2,781.68 10/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,576.06 1,576.06 10/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,236.49 1,236.49 10/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 483.00 483.00 10/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 105,367.86 105,367.86 10/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 98,114.97 98,114.97 10/6 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 452.71 452.71 10/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 334.57 334.57 10/6 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 19,334.03 19,334.03 10/10 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 13,175.70 13,175.70 10/10 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 3,079.42 3,079.42 10/11 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 882.61 882.61 10/13 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 32,360.16 32,360.16 10/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,010.23 1,010.23 10/13 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 576.75 576.75 10/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,492.74 1,492.74 10/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,444.46 1,444.46 10/17 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 98.06 98.06 10/18 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 177.74 177.74 10/19 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 105,386.59 105,386.59 10/19 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 98,558.58 98,558.58 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 105,062.09 105,062.09 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 55,124.28 55,124.28 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 11,945.51 11,945.51 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,068.65 6,068.65 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,042.25 3,042.25 10/19 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,748.16 2,748.16 10/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,781.68 2,781.68 10/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,361.56 1,361.56 10/19 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,007.69 1,007.69 10/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,195.25 1,195.25 10/20 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 192,164.71 192,164.71 10/20 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 393.57 393.57 10/23 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 143.82 143.82 10/23 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,065.63 2,065.63 10/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 199,441.72 199,441.72 10/24 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 253.28 253.28 10/24 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 12,513.28 12,513.28 10/26 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 51.53 51.53 10/27 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 62,377.39 62,377.39 10/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 291.08 291.08 10/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 10/30 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment 141,494.61 47,320.77 188,815.38 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register OCTOBER 1, 2023 TO OCTOBER 31, 2023 1 Page 24 of 273 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register OCTOBER 1, 2023 TO OCTOBER 31, 2023 10/30 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 16,752.42 16,752.42 10/31 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 75.00 75.00 10/31 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,056.66 1,056.66 TOTAL CITY 1,020,371.05 TOTAL FIRE 714,884.41 GRAND TOTAL 1,735,255.46 2 Page 25 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Fire District Weekly Check Register for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $88.76 Dated November 06, 2023, Through November 26, 2023. (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $88.75 for the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 26 of 273 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11/6/2023 through 11/26/2023 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00441485 11/21/2023 SOCAL GAS 0.00 88.76 88.76 $0.00 $88.76 $88.76 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 07:38:26 11/27/2023Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 27 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Noah Daniels, Finance Director Jason Shields, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File the AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council receive and file the AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2023. BACKGROUND: California Government Code Sections 66000-66025 (the "Mitigation Fee Act") sets forth the legal requirements for enactment of a development impact fee program, the bulk of which was adopted as 1987's Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 and commonly referred to as "AB 1600 requirements." The AB 1600 requirements stipulate that fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any project on which they are imposed. In addition, AB 1600 requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees as defined in Government Code Sections 66006(b) and 66001(d). Each year, the City prepares the Development Impact Fee Report to meet these requirements. ANALYSIS: California Government Code Section 66006(b) requires that for each separate account or fund, the City will report the following information for the fiscal year: 1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund 2. The amount of the fee 3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund 4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned 5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement 6. Identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if sufficient funds have been collected 7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund 8. The amount of refunds made, or due to be made, from surplus fees. Or the amount of refunds made from surplus fees The City Council should receive this report per AB 1600 requirements. After Council approval, this report will be available for public review on the City’s website per Section 66006(b). Page 28 of 273 Page 2 2 1 2 5 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's Core Value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future by complying with reporting requirements for revenues that mitigate development impacts. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report Page 29 of 273 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AB 1600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 ATTACHMENT 1Page 30 of 273 Table of Contents Legal Requirements .................................................................................................................. 1 Description of Public Facility Fees ..................................................................................... 2-16 Current Fee Schedule ....................................................................................................... 17-18 Development Impact Fee Capital Project Expenditures .................................................. 19-20 Page 31 of 273 1 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORTING On June 4, 1980, the City Council approved the collection of fees for park and recreational expansion in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to mitigate the impacts of future development (formerly RCMC 3.24). In the following years, the City Council approved additional development impact fees for Transportation (RCMC Chapter 3.28), Drainage Systems (RCMC Chapters 13.08 and 13.09), Community and Recreation Center (RCMC Chapter 3.52), Library (RCMC Chapter 3.56), Animal Center (RCMC Chapter 3.60), Police (RCMC Chapter 3.64), and Park In-Lieu/Park Impact (RCMC Chapter 3.68). Nexus procedures were developed to establish the relationship between the proposed development and its impact on the City. Pursuant to the Municipal Code, impact fees have been periodically updated since considering the initial Development Impact Fee Resolutions by the City Council. A. California Government Code Sections 66006(b) and 66001(d) California Government Code Section 66006(b) defines the specific reporting requirements for local agencies that impose AB 1600 DIFs on new development. Annually, for each separate fund established for the collection and expenditure of DIFs, the local agency shall make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year. 1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund 2. The amount of the fee 3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund 4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned 5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement 6. Identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if sufficient funds have been collected 7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund 8. The amount of refunds made due to made from surplus fees C. ADDITIONAL NOTES The State of California Government Code Section 66002 states that local agencies that have developed a fee program may adopt a capital improvement plan indicating the approximate location, size, and timing of projects, plus an estimate for the cost of all facilities or improvements to be financed by fees. The City's Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Capital Improvement Program can be found on the City's website (www.cityofrc.us). Page 32 of 273 2 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Fund 111 – Park Land Acquisition: This fee intends to provide funding for the development and acquisition of parks. Due to the provisions of the Quimby Act applying only to land acquisition and only in residential subdivisions, separate park impact fees for park Land acquisition in non-subdivision projects and park improvements are necessary. The park fees are calculated for a single service area encompassing the entire City. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs and average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 1,537,674$ 1,029,923$ 1,429,190$ 1,699,875$ 570,771$ Interest 64,214 101,591 5,983 (257,832) 1 83,577 Total Revenues 1,601,888 1,131,514 1,435,173 1,442,043 654,348 Expenditures 290 7,454 15,454 2,480 2,920 Total Expenditures 290 7,454 15,454 2,480 2,920 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,601,598 1,124,059 1,419,719 1,439,563 651,428 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 1,350,198 2,951,796 4,075,856 5,495,575 6,935,138 Fund Balance, End of year 2,951,796$ 4,075,856$ 5,495,575$ 6,935,138$ 7,586,566$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 1,537,674$ 1,029,923$ 1,429,190$ 1,699,875$ 570,771$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 1,429,190 1,699,875 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 1,429,190 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)80,227 1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)2,931 75,704 1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 60,250 1,130,766 1,318,235 Accumulated Interest Earned 67,578 169,169 175,153 (82,679) 898 Total Revenue Available 2,951,796$ 4,075,856$ 5,495,575$ 6,935,138$ 7,586,566$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Five-Year Revenue Test Page 33 of 273 3 Fund 112 – Drainage Facilities: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is affected by surface and storm waters. The continual subdivision and development of property within the City has demanded existing facilities that handle surface and storm waters. To provide an equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the development of such facilities, the City Council determined that a drainage plan must be adopted and a drainage fee established to provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 02-061 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 753,875$ 602,499$ 441,124$ 1,859,788$ 225,252$ Interest 116,243 106,439 (15,115) 1 (111,268) 1 37,479 Total Revenues 870,119 708,938 426,009 1,748,520 262,731 Expenditures 364,842 41,758 3,563,206 188,459 59,431 Total Expenditures 364,842 41,758 3,563,206 188,459 59,431 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 505,277 667,181 (3,137,197) 1,560,061 203,300 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 3,062,945 3,568,222 4,235,403 1,098,206 2,658,267 Fund Balance, End of year 3,568,222$ 4,235,403$ 1,098,206$ 2,658,267$ 2,861,568$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 753,875$ 602,499$ 441,124$ 1,859,788$ 225,252$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)1,091,047 753,875 367,666 441,124 1,859,788 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)488,542 1,091,047 179,207 441,124 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)246,926 488,542 - 119,776 2 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)723,724 246,926 - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 66,016 747,982 - - Accumulated Interest Earned 198,092 304,531 289,417 178,149 215,628 Total Revenue Available 3,568,222$ 4,235,403$ 1,098,206$ 2,658,267$ 2,861,568$ Notes: 2. Five-Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 (d). Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 34 of 273 4 Fund 113 – Community and Recreation Centers: This fee relates to the City's existing community and recreation centers and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The impact fees may be used for, but shall not limited to, land acquisition and site improvements, building construction/expansion, interior building improvements, furniture, fixtures and exercise equipment, sports and play equipment, special needs equipment, technical centers, and aquatic facilities. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for replacement costs and the existing population. The City's community and recreation centers serve the entire City, so the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fees are calculated for a single service area encompassing the whole City. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 543,520$ 362,663$ 533,387$ 893,342$ 696,074$ Interest 23,858 37,494 1,278 (105,035) 1 17,982 Total Revenues 567,378 400,157 534,665 788,307 714,056 Expenditures 110 14,147 6,147 910 710 Total Expenditures 110 14,147 6,147 910 710 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 567,268 386,011 528,518 787,397 713,346 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 516,915 1,084,183 1,470,194 1,998,712 2,786,109 Fund Balance, End of year 1,084,183$ 1,470,194$ 1,998,712$ 2,786,109$ 3,499,455$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 543,520$ 362,663$ 533,387$ 893,342$ 696,074$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)65,645 543,520 362,663 533,387 893,342 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)422,182 65,645 543,520 362,663 533,387 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)27,761 422,182 65,645 543,520 362,663 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- 13,614 422,182 65,645 543,520 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 7,467 428,739 493,674 Accumulated Interest Earned 25,076 62,570 63,848 (41,187) (23,205) Total Revenue Available 1,084,183$ 1,470,194$ 1,998,712$ 2,786,109$ 3,499,455$ Notes:1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test Page 35 of 273 5 Fund 114 – Drainage-Etiwanda/San Sevaine: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 16,848$ 14,430$ 9,048$ 137,982$ 94,556$ Interest 13,017 6,569 (249) 1 (15,092) 1 2,682 Total Revenues 29,865 20,999 8,799 122,890 97,238 Expenditures 176,927 14,691 250 250 130 Total Expenditures 176,927 14,691 250 250 130 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (147,062) 6,308 8,549 122,640 97,108 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 410,324 263,262 269,570 278,119 400,759 Fund Balance, End of year 263,262$ 269,570$ 278,119$ 400,759$ 497,867$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 16,848$ 14,430$ 9,048$ 137,982$ 94,556$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)93,756 16,848 14,430 9,048 137,982 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)100,083 93,756 16,848 14,430 9,048 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- 85,392 93,756 16,848 14,430 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- - 85,142 178,648 195,366 2 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Accumulated Interest Earned 52,575 59,144 58,895 43,803 46,485 Total Revenue Available 263,262$ 269,570$ 278,119$ 400,759$ 497,867$ Notes: 2. Five-Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 (d). Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 36 of 273 6 Fund 115 – Drainage-Henderson/Wardman: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Henderson/Wardman Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,050$ Interest 16,643 7,075 (12,794) 1 (38,381) 1 4,053 Total Revenues 16,643 7,075 (12,794) (38,381) 6,103 Expenditures 250 260 360 360 - Total Expenditures 250 260 360 360 - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 16,393 6,815 (13,154) (38,741) 6,103 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 967,342 983,735 990,550 977,396 938,655 Fund Balance, End of year 983,735$ 990,550$ 977,396$ 938,655$ 944,759$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,050$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)62,464 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 923,889 986,093 985,733 985,373 985,374 Accumulated Interest Earned (2,617) 4,457 (8,336) (46,717) (42,664) Total Revenue Available 983,735$ 990,550$ 977,396$ 938,655$ 944,759$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 37 of 273 7 Fund 116 – Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 19,224$ -$ 10,788$ 41,106$ 64,354$ Interest 70,194 55,284 (2,132) 1 (71,435) 1 26,566 Total Revenues 89,418 55,284 8,656 (30,329) 90,920 Expenditures 90,639 25,859 30,604 39,323 3,732 Total Expenditures 90,639 25,859 30,604 39,323 3,732 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,220) 29,425 (21,948) (69,652) 87,188 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 2,061,718 2,060,498 2,089,923 2,067,975 1,998,323 Fund Balance, End of year 2,060,498$ 2,089,923$ 2,067,975$ 1,998,323$ 2,085,511$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 19,224$ -$ 10,788$ 41,106$ 64,354$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)109,582 19,224 - 10,788 41,106 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)135,501 109,582 19,224 - 10,788 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)206,878 135,501 109,582 19,224 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)208,288 206,878 135,501 109,582 19,224 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 1,192,457 1,374,886 1,551,160 1,647,338 1,753,188 Accumulated Interest Earned 188,568 243,852 241,720 170,285 196,851 Total Revenue Available 2,060,498$ 2,089,923$ 2,067,975$ 1,998,323$ 2,085,511$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 38 of 273 8 Fund 118 – Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on per net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 19,685 16,061 (556) 1 (20,851) 1 8,329 Total Revenues 19,685 16,061 (556) (20,851) 8,329 Expenditures 380 390 450 450 Total Expenditures 380 390 450 450 - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 19,305 15,671 (1,006) (21,301) 8,329 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 573,978 593,283 608,955 607,949 586,648 Fund Balance, End of year 593,283$ 608,955$ 607,949$ 586,648$ 594,977$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)19,790 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 520,104 539,504 539,054 538,604 538,604 Accumulated Interest Earned 53,390 69,451 68,895 48,044 56,373 Total Revenue Available 593,283$ 608,955$ 607,949$ 586,648$ 594,977$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Five-Year Revenue Test Page 39 of 273 9 Fund 119 – Park Improvement: This impact fee intends to provide funding for park improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs and average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 796,949$ 528,838$ 860,217$ 1,681,547$ 1,304,823$ Interest 34,963 55,010 1,924 (172,549) 1 43,883 Total Revenues 831,912 583,848 862,141 1,508,998 1,348,706 Expenditures - 3,422 7,017 750 526,719 Total Expenditures - 3,422 7,017 750 526,719 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 831,912 580,425 855,125 1,508,248 821,987 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 757,748 1,589,660 2,170,085 3,025,210 4,533,458 Fund Balance, End of year 1,589,660$ 2,170,085$ 3,025,210$ 4,533,458$ 5,355,445$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 796,949$ 528,838$ 860,217$ 1,681,547$ 1,304,823$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)96,238 796,949 528,838 860,217 1,681,547 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)618,821 96,238 796,949 528,838 860,217 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)40,855 618,821 96,238 796,949 528,838 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- 37,433 618,821 96,238 796,949 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 30,416 648,487 218,006 Accumulated Interest Earned 36,797 91,807 93,732 (78,817) (34,934) Total Revenue Available 1,589,660$ 2,170,085$ 3,025,210$ 4,533,458$ 5,355,445$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 40 of 273 10 Fund 120 – Park Development: This fee intends to provide for the acquisition, development, and initial equipment of new parks or the expansion of land or services on existing parks in accordance with the park, parkway, and open space element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Following the adoption of Ordinance No. 865, the Park Land Acquisition, Park Improvement, and the Community and Recreation Center Impact fees replaced the fees collected under the Park Development Fee. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 97,438$ -$ 98,645$ -$ -$ Interest 272,746 215,675 (22,669) 1 (273,199) 1 126,186 Total Revenues 370,184 215,675 75,976 (273,199) 126,186 Expenditures 205,812 385,583 321,903 514,443 272,035 Total Expenditures 205,812 385,583 321,903 514,443 272,035 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 164,373 (169,908) (245,926) (787,642) (145,849) Fund Balance, Beginning of year 8,200,527 8,364,900 8,194,992 7,949,065 7,161,423 Fund Balance, End of year 8,364,900$ 8,194,992$ 7,949,065$ 7,161,423$ 7,015,575$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 97,438$ -$ 98,645$ -$ -$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- 97,438 - 98,645 - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - 97,438 - 98,645 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - 97,438 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)2,456,180 - - - 97,438 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 4,769,775 6,840,372 6,518,470 6,004,027 5,731,992 Accumulated Interest Earned 1,041,507 1,257,181 1,234,513 961,314 1,087,500 Total Revenue Available 8,364,900$ 8,194,992$ 7,949,065$ 7,161,423$ 7,015,575$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Page 41 of 273 11 Fund 122 – South Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the South Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 188,100$ -$ -$ -$ 676,665$ Interest 31,664 29,800 (1,007) 1 (38,247) 1 (6,354) 1 Total Revenues 219,764 29,800 (1,007) (38,247) 670,311 Expenditures 160 240 800 800 470 Total Expenditures 160 240 800 800 470 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 219,604 29,560 (1,807) (39,047) 669,841 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 865,218 1,084,823 1,114,382 1,112,575 1,073,528 Fund Balance, End of year 1,084,823$ 1,114,382$ 1,112,575$ 1,073,528$ 1,743,369$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 188,100$ -$ -$ -$ 676,665$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)217,965 188,100 - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- 217,965 188,100 - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - 217,965 188,100 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)321,585 - - 217,965 188,100 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 297,533 618,878 618,078 617,278 834,773 Accumulated Interest Earned 59,639 89,439 88,432 50,185 43,831 Total Revenue Available 1,084,823$ 1,114,382$ 1,112,575$ 1,073,528$ 1,743,369$ Notes: Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Five-Year Revenue Test Page 42 of 273 12 Fund 123 – Library: The City has two existing libraries, the Archibald Library and the Paul A. Biane Library, part of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The Paul A. Biane Library includes space for future expansion, and the City will assess the need for the Joint Use Facility at The Resort. To provide funds for library facilities and materials needed to serve future development, the City Council determined that a development impact fee is necessary for land acquisition and site improvements; building construction or expansion; interior building improvements; furniture, fixtures, and equipment; library materials; theatre facilities; special needs equipment and facilities; technical centers; and special activities facilities. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for library facilities and materials and the average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 196,042$ 152,220$ 206,369$ 311,353$ 243,382$ Interest 18,277 21,863 167 (48,739) 1 11,172 Total Revenues 214,319 174,083 206,536 262,614 254,554 Expenditures - 12,439 2,646 260 1,180 Total Expenditures - 12,439 2,646 260 1,180 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 214,319 161,644 203,890 262,354 253,374 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 469,003 683,321 844,966 1,048,855 1,311,209 Fund Balance, End of year 683,321$ 844,966$ 1,048,855$ 1,311,209$ 1,564,584$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 196,042$ 152,220$ 206,369$ 311,353$ 243,382$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)43,401 196,042 152,220 206,369 311,353 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)183,164 43,401 196,042 152,220 206,369 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)130,105 183,164 43,401 196,042 152,220 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)106,649 130,105 183,164 43,401 196,042 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 94,211 221,670 404,574 446,795 Accumulated Interest Earned 23,960 45,823 45,990 (2,749) 8,423 Total Revenue Available 683,321$ 844,966$ 1,048,855$ 1,311,209$ 1,564,584$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Five-Year Revenue Test Page 43 of 273 13 Fund 124 – Transportation: Certain thoroughfares and bridges must be improved or constructed to mitigate the traffic impacts caused by new development and meet the circulation element's goals and objectives. The City Council has determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and pay for the development's fair share of the costs of these improvements. Impact fees are calculated based on the equivalent dwelling unit based on the land use type adopted in Resolution No. 20-005. The impact fee per equivalent dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 9,320,720$ 5,664,811$ 8,174,413$ 10,718,234$ 8,157,191$ Interest 1,008,520 928,355 12,512 (1,821,213) 1 485,731 Other Revenues 341,728 296,647 311,562 3,195 Total Revenues 10,670,968 6,889,813 8,498,488 8,897,021 8,646,117 Expenditures 3,810,209 1,361,925 3,048,294 1,495,315 838,598 Total Expenditures 3,810,209 1,361,925 3,048,294 1,495,315 838,598 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 6,860,760 5,527,888 5,450,194 7,401,706 7,807,519 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 24,453,463 31,314,223 36,842,111 42,292,305 49,694,011 Fund Balance, End of year 31,314,223$ 36,842,111$ 42,292,305$ 49,694,011$ 57,501,530$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 9,320,720$ 5,664,811$ 8,174,413$ 10,718,234$ 8,157,191$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 8,174,413 10,718,234 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 8,174,413 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)3,017,054 4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)4,482,634 3,017,054 4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 3,417,357 3,697,680 6,466,632 13,682,301 Accumulated Interest Earned 2,178,475 3,106,830 3,119,342 1,298,129 1,783,860 Total Revenue Available 31,314,223$ 36,842,111$ 42,292,305$ 49,694,011$ 57,501,530$ Notes:1. Negative Other Revenue negative amount due to accounting adjustments Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test Page 44 of 273 14 Fund 125 – Animal Center: The City's existing Animal Center is at capacity, and additional space will be needed for the growing demand imposed by future development. To meet that demand, the City Council has determined that a development impact fee is necessary for land acquisition and site improvements; building construction and expansion; interior building improvements; furniture, fixtures, and equipment; special needs equipment and facilities; veterinarian equipment and facilities; transportation facilities; kennel facilities; transportation facilities; and outdoor dog runs and play areas. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for existing facilities and the average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 32,014$ 28,365$ 44,177$ 62,159$ 48,206$ Interest 3,692 4,169 62 (9,633) 1 2,154 Total Revenues 35,706 32,534 44,239 52,526 50,360 Expenditures - 168 368 60 650 Total Expenditures - 168 368 60 650 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 35,706 32,366 43,871 52,466 49,710 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 96,144 131,850 164,216 208,087 260,553 Fund Balance, End of year 131,850$ 164,216$ 208,087$ 260,553$ 310,263$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 32,014$ 28,365$ 44,177$ 62,159$ 48,206$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)9,534 32,014 28,365 44,177 62,159 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)34,364 9,534 32,014 28,365 44,177 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)28,066 34,364 9,534 32,014 28,365 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)22,974 50,872 34,364 9,534 32,014 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 50,504 84,808 93,692 Accumulated Interest Earned 4,898 9,067 9,129 (504) 1,650 Total Revenue Available 131,850$ 164,216$ 208,087$ 260,553$ 310,263$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Other Revenue negative amount due to accounting adjustments Five-Year Revenue Test Page 45 of 273 15 Fund 126 – Lower Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Lower Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 06-032 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ 59,568$ -$ 427,281$ 167,435$ Interest 20,890 17,636 (447) 1 (41,441) 1 10,719 Total Revenues 20,890 77,205 (447) 385,840 178,154 Expenditures 390 400 480 480 300 Total Expenditures 390 400 480 480 300 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 20,500 76,805 (927) 385,360 177,854 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 609,850 630,351 707,155 706,228 1,091,588 Fund Balance, End of year 630,351$ 707,155$ 706,228$ 1,091,588$ 1,269,442$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ 59,568$ -$ 427,281$ 167,435$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - 59,568 - 427,281 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - 59,568 - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - 59,568 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)63,754 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 511,996 575,350 574,870 574,390 574,090 Accumulated Interest Earned 54,601 72,238 71,790 30,349 41,068 Total Revenue Available 630,351$ 707,155$ 706,228$ 1,091,588$ 1,269,442$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Five-Year Revenue Test Page 46 of 273 16 Fund 127 – Police: The City's existing police facility is at capacity, and additional space is needed to serve the growing demand imposed by future development. The impact fee for police facilities is based on the relationship between the Police Department calls for service per year generated by existing development and the department's facilities' replacement cost. The funds will provide land acquisition and improvements; building construction; furniture, fixtures, equipment; technical centers, and transportation facilities for the City's Police Department. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the average cost per call for service and the calls per unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 152,816$ 117,280$ 135,096$ 186,794$ 163,806$ Interest 14,038 16,333 138 (34,062) 1 8,163 Total Revenues 166,854 133,614 135,234 152,732 171,969 Expenditures - 11,890 1,573 200 1,310 Total Expenditures - 11,890 1,573 200 1,310 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 166,854 121,723 133,661 152,532 170,659 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 346,553 513,407 635,130 768,792 921,324 Fund Balance, End of year 513,407$ 635,130$ 768,792$ 921,324$ 1,091,983$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 152,816$ 117,280$ 135,096$ 186,794$ 163,806$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)113,023 152,816 117,280 135,096 186,794 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)120,240 113,023 152,816 117,280 135,096 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)63,034 120,240 113,023 152,816 117,280 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)47,769 63,034 120,240 113,023 152,816 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 35,879 97,340 217,379 329,093 Accumulated Interest Earned 16,525 32,859 32,997 (1,065) 7,098 Total Revenue Available 513,407$ 635,130$ 768,792$ 921,324$ 1,091,983$ Notes:1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test Page 47 of 273 17 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE Fees effective as of June 30, 2023: Park Land Acquisition Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $4,060 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $2,772 Residential, Mobile Home Park $2,171 Assisted Living Facility $1,349 Park Improvement Impact Fee (All Residential Development (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $3,923 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $2,678 Residential, Mobile Home Park $2,098 Assisted Living Facility $1,304 General City Drainage Fee (per net acre) $23,015 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area Fee (per net acre) Total Fee = (1) Regional Mainline + (1) Secondary Regional + (1) Master Plan Regional Mainline Fee Upper Etiwanda $7,800 San Sevaine $2,500 Lower Etiwanda $0 Secondary Regional Fee Henderson/Wardman $6,400 Hawker-Crawford $4,700 Victoria Basin $400 Upper Etiwanda Interceptor $2,000 Master Plan Fee Upper Etiwanda $8,900 San Sevaine $2,900 Lower Etiwanda $16,500 Middle Etiwanda $32,199 Library Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $762 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $521 Residential, Mobile Home Park $408 Assisted Living Facility $253 Animal Center Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $144 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $99 Residential, Mobile Home Park $77 Assisted Living Facility $48 Page 48 of 273 18 Fees effective as of June 30, 2022 (Continued): Police Impact Fee Residential, Single Family (Detached) (per dwelling unit) $322 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) (per dwelling unit) $254 Residential, Mobile Home Park $155 Assisted Living Facilities (per dwelling unit) $117 Commercial/Retail KSF (per 1000 sf) $1,013 Office KSF (per 1000 sf) $317 Industrial KSF (per 1000 sf) $46 Hotel/Motel (per room) $156 Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $2,123 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $1,449 Residential, Mobile Home Park $1,135 Assisted Living Facility $706 Transportation Development Fees Single Family Dwelling Unit (per unit) $12,708 Multi-Family Dwelling Unit (per unit) $7,625 Apartment or Condominium (per unit) $7,625 Senior Housing-Attached (Apartments or Condos) (per bedroom) $2,542 Nursing/Congregate Care (per bedroom) $2,542 Commercial (per 1,000 sf) $19,062 Industrial (per 1,000 sf) $7,625 Warehouse (per 1,000 sf) $6,354 Office/Business Park (per 1,000 sf) $15,250 Hotel/Motel (per room) $10,166 Self-Storage (per storage unit) $254 Day Care (per student) $3,177 Service Station (per gas pump) $63,540 Page 49 of 273 19 Development Impact Fees Current Projects Project Phase Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Date of Completion Total Estimated Project Cost(1) Budget To Date(1) Estimated % of Project Funded with Fees(2) Parkland Acquisition Impact Fee 111 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee 113 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Drainage – Henderson/Wardman Impact Fee 115 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 116 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda Impact Fee 118 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Park Improvement Impact Fee 119 Central Park - Amphitheatre In Review TBD TBD 11,000,000 1,500,000 13.64% Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground In Progress 21/22 23/24 1,156,480 772,690 66.81% Construction Development Impact Fee Project Identification Impact Fee/Fund Page 50 of 273 20 Development Impact Fees Current Projects Project Phase Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Date of Completion Total Estimated Project Cost(1) Budget To Date(1) Estimated % of Project Funded with Fees(2) Park Development Impact Fee 120 Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead In Progress 23/24 23/24 1,763,890 80,000 4.54% South Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 122 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Library Impact Fee 123 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Transportation Impact Fee 124 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing West of Etiwanda In Progress 23/24 27/28 3,112,000 1,987,000 63.85% Advance Traffic Management System Phase 2 In Progress 23/24 23/24 7,449,900 7,272,900 97.62% Etiwanda Avenue - East Side Widening In Progress 23/24 26/27 1,128,000 1,123,000 99.56% HSIP Traffic Signal Modification at Various Locations In Progress 23/24 23/24 717,400 264,400 36.86% Animal Center Impact Fee 125 Animal Center Office Reconfigure In Progress 23/24 24/25 220,000 220,000 100.00% Lower Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 126 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. Police Impact Fee 127 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds have been collected for the potential projects. (1) Estimated Project Cost and Budget to Date amounts are from the 2023/24 -Capital Improvement Program. Funding to Date amounts are as of June 30, 2028. Budget to Date and Funding to Date include DIF amounts only. For information on additional funding sources please see the Capital Improvement Program at www.CityofRC.us. (2) Estimated funding with DIFs may include funding that is anticipated to occur in future years and will be budgeted accordingly in future years' Capital Improvement Programs. Construction Development Impact Fee Project Identification Impact Fee/Fund Page 51 of 273 Page 1 of 1 REVISION: Attached is a revised Staff Report for item D4 on the Consent Calendar. On December 5, 2023, the City received a letter from the Desert Valley Builders Association providing comments on the AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023. Staff has reviewed the comments and updated the report to clarify items addressed in the letter. A copy of the updated report is included here as Attachment 1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council receive and file the attached AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2023. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Updated AB1600 Report (Item D4 Attachment 1) Attachment 2 –Desert Valley Builders Association Letter DATE: December 6, 2023 TO: John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Noah Daniels, Finance Director Jason Shields, Management Analyst II BY: Jason Welday, City Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File the AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023. (CITY) MEMORANDUM Engineering Department Corrected Staff Report Memo: 12/6/2023 Item D4 Consent Calendar CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AB 1600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 ATTACHMENT 1 Table of Contents Legal Requirements .................................................................................................................. 1 Description of Public Facility Fees ..................................................................................... 2-16 Current Fee Schedule ....................................................................................................... 17-18 Development Impact Fee Capital Project Expenditures .................................................. 19-23 1 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORTING On June 4, 1980, the City Council approved the collection of fees for park and recreational expansion in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to mitigate the impacts of future development (formerly RCMC 3.24). In the following years, the City Council approved additional development impact fees for Transportation (RCMC Chapter 3.28), Drainage Systems (RCMC Chapters 13.08 and 13.09), Community and Recreation Center (RCMC Chapter 3.52), Library (RCMC Chapter 3.56), Animal Center (RCMC Chapter 3.60), Police (RCMC Chapter 3.64), and Park In-Lieu/Park Impact (RCMC Chapter 3.68). Nexus procedures were developed to establish the relationship between the proposed development and its impact on the City. Pursuant to the Municipal Code, impact fees have been periodically updated since considering the initial Development Impact Fee Resolutions by the City Council. A. California Government Code Sections 66006(b) and 66001(d) California Government Code Section 66006(b) defines the specific reporting requirements for local agencies that impose AB 1600 DIFs on new development. Annually, for each separate fund established for the collection and expenditure of DIFs, the local agency shall make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year. 1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund 2. The amount of the fee 3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund 4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned 5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement. (Development Impact Fee Capital Project Expenditure Schedule located at end of report) 6. Identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if sufficient funds have been collected 7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund 8. The amount of refunds made due to made from surplus fees C. ADDITIONAL NOTES The State of California Government Code Section 66002 states that local agencies that have developed a fee program may adopt a capital improvement plan indicating the approximate location, size, and timing of projects, plus an estimate for the cost of all facilities or improvements to be financed by fees. The City's Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Capital Improvement Program can be found on the City's website (www.cityofrc.us). 2 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Fund 111 – Park Land Acquisition: This fee intends to provide funding for the development and acquisition of parks. Due to the provisions of the Quimby Act applying only to land acquisition and only in residential subdivisions, separate park impact fees for park Land acquisition in non-subdivision projects and park improvements are necessary. The park fees are calculated for a single service area encompassing the entire City. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs and average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 1,537,674$ 1,029,923$ 1,429,190$ 1,699,875$ 570,771$ Interest 64,214 101,591 5,983 (257,832) 1 83,577 Total Revenues 1,601,888 1,131,514 1,435,173 1,442,043 654,348 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 290 7,454 15,454 2,480 2,920 Total Expenditures 290 7,454 15,454 2,480 2,920 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,601,598 1,124,060 1,419,719 1,439,563 651,428 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 1,350,198 2,951,796 4,075,856 5,495,575 6,935,138 Fund Balance, End of year 2,951,796$ 4,075,856$ 5,495,575$ 6,935,138$ 7,586,566$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 1,537,674$ 1,029,923$ 1,429,190$ 1,699,875$ 570,771$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 1,429,190 1,699,875 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 1,429,190 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)80,227 1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 1,029,923 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)2,931 75,705 1,072,996 190,389 1,537,674 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 60,251 1,130,767 1,318,236 Accumulated Interest Earned 67,578 169,169 175,153 (82,679) 898 Total Revenue Available 2,951,796$ 4,075,856$ 5,495,575$ 6,935,138$ 7,586,566$ Notes: 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 3 Fund 112 – Drainage Facilities: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is affected by surface and storm waters. The continual subdivision and development of property within the City has demanded existing facilities that handle surface and storm waters. To provide an equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the development of such facilities, the City Council determined that a drainage plan must be adopted and a drainage fee established to provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 02-061 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 753,875$ 602,499$ 441,124$ 1,859,788$ 225,252$ Interest 116,243 106,439 (15,115) 1 (111,268) 1 37,479 Total Revenues 870,119 708,938 426,009 1,748,520 262,731 Expenditures Capital 364,842 - 3,513,841 138,660 20,000 Other 2 - 41,758 49,364 49,799 39,431 Total Expenditures 364,842 41,758 3,563,206 188,459 59,431 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 505,277 667,180 (3,137,197) 1,560,061 203,300 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 3,062,945 3,568,222 4,235,403 1,098,206 2,658,267 Fund Balance, End of year 3,568,222$ 4,235,403$ 1,098,206$ 2,658,267$ 2,861,568$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 753,875$ 602,499$ 441,124$ 1,859,788$ 225,252$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)1,091,047 753,875 367,665 441,124 1,859,788 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)488,542 1,091,047 - 179,206 441,124 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)246,926 488,542 - - 119,775 3 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)723,724 246,926 - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 66,016 - 747,982 - - - Accumulated Interest Earned 198,092 304,531 289,417 178,149 215,628 Total Revenue Available 3,568,222$ 4,235,403$ 1,098,206$ 2,658,267$ 2,861,568$ Notes: 3. Five-Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 (d). 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 4 Fund 113 – Community and Recreation Centers: This fee relates to the City's existing community and recreation centers and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The impact fees may be used for, but shall not limited to, land acquisition and site improvements, building construction/expansion, interior building improvements, furniture, fixtures and exercise equipment, sports and play equipment, special needs equipment, technical centers, and aquatic facilities. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for replacement costs and the existing population. The City's community and recreation centers serve the entire City, so the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fees are calculated for a single service area encompassing the whole City. Descritpion 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 543,520$ 362,663$ 533,387$ 893,342$ 696,074$ Interest 23,858 37,494 1,278 (105,035) 1 17,982 Total Revenues 567,378 400,157 534,665 788,307 714,056 Expenditures Capital - 11,666 - - - Other 2 110 2,480 6,147 910 710 Total Expenditures 110 14,146 6,147 910 710 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 567,268 386,011 528,518 787,397 713,346 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 516,915 1,084,183 1,470,195 1,998,712 2,786,109 Fund Balance, End of year 1,084,183$ 1,470,195$ 1,998,712$ 2,786,109$ 3,499,455$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 543,520$ 362,663$ 533,387$ 893,342$ 696,074$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)65,645 543,520 362,663 533,387 893,342 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)422,182 65,645 543,520 362,663 533,387 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)27,761 422,182 65,645 543,520 362,663 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- 13,615 422,182 65,645 543,520 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 7,468 428,739 493,674 Accumulated Interest Earned 25,076 62,570 63,848 (41,187) (23,205) Total Revenue Available 1,084,183$ 1,470,194$ 1,998,712$ 2,786,109$ 3,499,455$ Notes: Five-Year Revenue Test Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. 5 Fund 114 – Drainage-Etiwanda/San Sevaine: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 16,848$ 14,430$ 9,048$ 137,982$ 94,556$ Interest 13,017 6,569 (249) 1 (15,092) 1 2,682 Total Revenues 29,865 20,999 8,799 122,890 97,238 Expenditures Capital 176,927 14,321 - - - Other 2 - 370 250 250 130 Total Expenditures 176,927 14,691 250 250 130 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (147,062) 6,308 8,549 122,640 97,108 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 410,324 263,262 269,570 278,119 400,759 Fund Balance, End of year 263,262$ 269,570$ 278,119$ 400,759$ 497,867$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 16,848$ 14,430$ 9,048$ 137,982$ 94,556$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)93,756 16,848 14,430 9,048 137,982 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)100,083 93,756 16,848 14,430 9,048 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- 85,392 93,756 16,848 14,430 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- - 85,142 178,648 195,366 3 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Accumulated Interest Earned 52,575 59,144 58,895 43,803 46,485 Total Revenue Available 263,262$ 269,570$ 278,119$ 400,759$ 497,867$ Notes: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 3. Five-Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 (d). 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. 6 Fund 115 – Drainage-Henderson/Wardman: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Henderson/Wardman Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,050$ Interest 16,643 7,075 (12,794) 1 (38,381) 1 4,053 Total Revenues 16,643 7,075 (12,794) (38,381) 6,103 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 250 260 360 360 - Total Expenditures 250 260 360 360 - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 16,393 6,815 (13,154) (38,741) 6,103 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 967,342 983,735 990,550 977,396 938,655 Fund Balance, End of year 983,735$ 990,550$ 977,396$ 938,655$ 944,759$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,050$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)62,464 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 923,889 986,093 985,733 985,373 985,374 Accumulated Interest Earned (2,617) 4,457 (8,336) (46,717) (42,664) Total Revenue Available 983,735$ 990,550$ 977,396$ 938,655$ 944,759$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 7 Fund 116 – Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 19,224$ -$ 10,788$ 41,106$ 64,354$ Interest 70,194 55,284 (2,132) 1 (71,435) 1 26,566 Total Revenues 89,418 55,284 8,656 (30,329) 90,920 Expenditures Capital 53,341 9,612 - 5,394 - Other 2 37,298 16,247 30,604 33,929 3,732 Total Expenditures 90,639 25,859 30,604 39,323 3,732 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,221) 29,425 (21,948) (69,652) 87,188 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 2,061,718 2,060,497 2,089,923 2,067,975 1,998,323 Fund Balance, End of year 2,060,497$ 2,089,923$ 2,067,975$ 1,998,323$ 2,085,511$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 19,224$ -$ 10,788$ 41,106$ 64,354$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)109,582 19,224 - 10,788 41,106 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)135,501 109,582 19,224 - 10,788 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)206,878 135,501 109,582 19,224 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)208,288 206,878 135,501 109,582 19,224 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 1,192,457 1,374,886 1,551,160 1,647,338 1,753,188 Accumulated Interest Earned 188,568 243,852 241,720 170,285 196,851 Total Revenue Available 2,060,497$ 2,089,923$ 2,067,975$ 1,998,323$ 2,085,511$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 8 Fund 118 – Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on per net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 19,685 16,061 (556) 1 (20,851) 1 8,329 Total Revenues 19,685 16,061 (556) (20,851) 8,329 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 380 390 450 450 - Total Expenditures 380 390 450 450 - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 19,305 15,671 (1,006) (21,301) 8,329 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 573,978 593,283 608,955 607,949 586,648 Fund Balance, End of year 593,283$ 608,955$ 607,949$ 586,648$ 594,977$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)19,790 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 520,104 539,504 539,054 538,604 538,604 Accumulated Interest Earned 53,390 69,451 68,895 48,044 56,373 Total Revenue Available 593,283$ 608,955$ 607,949$ 586,648$ 594,977$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 9 Fund 119 – Park Improvement: This impact fee intends to provide funding for park improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs and average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 796,949$ 528,838$ 860,217$ 1,681,547$ 1,304,823$ Interest 34,963 55,010 1,924 (172,549) 1 43,883 Total Revenues 831,912 583,848 862,141 1,508,998 1,348,706 Expenditures Capital - - - - 524,839 Other 2 - 3,422 7,017 750 1,880 Total Expenditures - 3,422 7,017 750 526,719 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 831,912 580,426 855,124 1,508,248 821,987 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 757,748 1,589,660 2,170,086 3,025,210 4,533,458 Fund Balance, End of year 1,589,660$ 2,170,086$ 3,025,210$ 4,533,458$ 5,355,445$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 796,949$ 528,838$ 860,217$ 1,681,547$ 1,304,823$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)96,238 796,949 528,838 860,217 1,681,547 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)618,821 96,238 796,949 528,838 860,217 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)40,855 618,821 96,238 796,949 528,838 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)- 37,433 618,821 96,238 796,949 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 30,416 648,487 218,006 Accumulated Interest Earned 36,797 91,807 93,732 (78,817) (34,934) Total Revenue Available 1,589,660$ 2,170,086$ 3,025,210$ 4,533,458$ 5,355,445$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 10 Fund 120 – Park Development: This fee intends to provide for the acquisition, development, and initial equipment of new parks or the expansion of land or services on existing parks in accordance with the park, parkway, and open space element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Following the adoption of Ordinance No. 865, the Park Land Acquisition, Park Improvement, and the Community and Recreation Center Impact fees replaced the fees collected under the Park Development Fee. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 97,438$ -$ 98,645$ -$ -$ Interest 272,746 215,675 (22,669) 1 (273,199) 1 126,186 Total Revenues 370,184 215,675 75,976 (273,199) 126,186 Expenditures Capital 203,437 270,065 205,334 462,280 250,525 Other 2 2,375 115,518 116,569 52,163 21,510 Total Expenditures 205,812 385,583 321,903 514,443 272,035 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 164,372 (169,908) (245,927) (787,642) (145,849) Fund Balance, Beginning of year 8,200,527 8,364,900 8,194,992 7,949,065 7,161,423 Fund Balance, End of year 8,364,900$ 8,194,992$ 7,949,065$ 7,161,423$ 7,015,575$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 97,438$ -$ 98,645$ -$ -$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- 97,438 - 98,645 - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - 97,438 - 98,645 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - 97,438 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)2,456,180 - - - 97,438 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 4,769,775 6,840,372 6,518,469 6,004,026 5,731,991 Accumulated Interest Earned 1,041,507 1,257,181 1,234,513 961,314 1,087,500 Total Revenue Available 8,364,900$ 8,194,992$ 7,949,065$ 7,161,423$ 7,015,575$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 11 Fund 122 – South Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the South Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 90-111 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 188,100$ -$ -$ -$ 676,665$ Interest 31,664 29,800 (1,007) 1 (38,247) 1 (6,354) 1 Total Revenues 219,764 29,800 (1,007) (38,247) 670,311 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 160 240 800 800 470 Total Expenditures 160 240 800 800 470 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 219,604 29,560 (1,807) (39,047) 669,841 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 865,218 1,084,823 1,114,382 1,112,575 1,073,528 Fund Balance, End of year 1,084,823$ 1,114,382$ 1,112,575$ 1,073,528$ 1,743,369$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 188,100$ -$ -$ -$ 676,665$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)217,965 188,100 - - - Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- 217,965 188,100 - - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - 217,965 188,100 - Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)321,585 - - 217,965 188,100 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 297,533 618,878 618,078 617,278 834,773 Accumulated Interest Earned 59,639 89,439 88,432 50,185 43,831 Total Revenue Available 1,084,823$ 1,114,382$ 1,112,575$ 1,073,528$ 1,743,369$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Five-Year Revenue Test 12 Fund 123 – Library: The City has two existing libraries, the Archibald Library and the Paul A. Biane Library, part of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. The Paul A. Biane Library includes space for future expansion, and the City will assess the need for the Joint Use Facility at The Resort. To provide funds for library facilities and materials needed to serve future development, the City Council determined that a development impact fee is necessary for land acquisition and site improvements; building construction or expansion; interior building improvements; furniture, fixtures, and equipment; library materials; theatre facilities; special needs equipment and facilities; technical centers; and special activities facilities. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for library facilities and materials and the average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 196,042$ 152,220$ 206,369$ 311,353$ 243,382$ Interest 18,277 21,863 167 (48,739) 1 11,172 Total Revenues 214,319 174,083 206,536 262,614 254,554 Expenditures Capital - 11,666 - - - Other 2 - 773 2,646 260 1,180 Total Expenditures - 12,439 2,646 260 1,180 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 214,319 161,644 203,890 262,354 253,374 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 469,003 683,321 844,965 1,048,855 1,311,209 Fund Balance, End of year 683,321$ 844,965$ 1,048,855$ 1,311,209$ 1,564,584$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 196,042$ 152,220$ 206,369$ 311,353$ 243,382$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)43,401 196,042 152,220 206,369 311,353 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)183,164 43,401 196,042 152,220 206,369 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)130,105 183,164 43,401 196,042 152,220 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)106,649 130,105 183,164 43,401 196,042 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 94,210 221,669 404,573 446,794 Accumulated Interest Earned 23,960 45,823 45,990 (2,749) 8,423 Total Revenue Available 683,321$ 844,965$ 1,048,855$ 1,311,209$ 1,564,584$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 13 Fund 124 – Transportation: Certain thoroughfares and bridges must be improved or constructed to mitigate the traffic impacts caused by new development and meet the circulation element's goals and objectives. The City Council has determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and pay for the development's fair share of the costs of these improvements. Impact fees are calculated based on the equivalent dwelling unit based on the land use type adopted in Resolution No. 20-005. The impact fee per equivalent dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 9,320,720$ 5,664,811$ 8,174,413$ 10,718,234$ 8,157,191$ Interest 1,008,520 928,355 12,512 (1,821,213) 1 485,731 Other Revenues 341,728 296,647 311,562 3,195 Total Revenues 10,670,968 6,889,813 8,498,488 8,897,021 8,646,117 Expenditures Capital 3,810,209 817,286 2,456,717 917,813 312,708 Other 2 - 544,639 591,576 577,502 525,890 Total Expenditures 3,810,209 1,361,925 3,048,294 1,495,315 838,598 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 6,860,759 5,527,888 5,450,194 7,401,706 7,807,519 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 24,453,463 31,314,223 36,842,111 42,292,305 49,694,011 Fund Balance, End of year 31,314,223$ 36,842,111$ 42,292,305$ 49,694,011$ 57,501,530$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 9,320,720$ 5,664,811$ 8,174,413$ 10,718,234$ 8,157,191$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 8,174,413 10,718,234 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 8,174,413 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)3,017,054 4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 5,664,811 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)4,482,634 3,017,054 4,264,267 8,051,072 9,320,720 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 3,417,356 3,697,679 6,466,631 13,682,301 Accumulated Interest Earned 2,178,475 3,106,830 3,119,342 1,298,129 1,783,860 Total Revenue Available 31,314,223$ 36,842,111$ 42,292,305$ 49,694,011$ 57,501,530$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 14 Fund 125 – Animal Center: The City's existing Animal Center is at capacity, and additional space will be needed for the growing demand imposed by future development. To meet that demand, the City Council has determined that a development impact fee is necessary for land acquisition and site improvements; building construction and expansion; interior building improvements; furniture, fixtures, and equipment; special needs equipment and facilities; veterinarian equipment and facilities; transportation facilities; kennel facilities; transportation facilities; and outdoor dog runs and play areas. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the per capita costs for existing facilities and the average population per dwelling unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 32,014$ 28,365$ 44,177$ 62,159$ 48,206$ Interest 3,692 4,169 62 (9,633) 1 2,154 Total Revenues 35,706 32,534 44,239 52,526 50,360 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 - 168 368 60 650 Total Expenditures - 168 368 60 650 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 35,706 32,366 43,871 52,466 49,710 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 96,144 131,850 164,216 208,087 260,553 Fund Balance, End of year 131,850$ 164,216$ 208,087$ 260,553$ 310,263$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 32,014$ 28,365$ 44,177$ 62,159$ 48,206$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)9,534 32,014 28,365 44,177 62,159 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)34,364 9,534 32,014 28,365 44,177 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)28,066 34,364 9,534 32,014 28,365 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)22,974 50,872 34,364 9,534 32,014 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - - 50,504 84,808 93,692 Accumulated Interest Earned 4,898 9,067 9,129 (504) 1,650 Total Revenue Available 131,850$ 164,216$ 208,087$ 260,553$ 310,263$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 15 Fund 126 – Lower Etiwanda Drainage: To implement the goals and objectives of the Public Health and Safety Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and mitigate the drainage impacts in the Lower Etiwanda Local Drainage Area caused by new development, certain public drainage improvements must be or have to be constructed. The City Council determined that a development impact fee is needed to finance these public improvements and assess such fee for a development's share of the construction costs of these improvements. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 06-032 at a rate based on the net acreage of the development as it relates to the benefit and impact area with the specific public improvements to be financed. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees -$ 59,568$ -$ 427,281$ 167,435$ Interest 20,890 17,636 (447) 1 (41,441) 1 10,719 Total Revenues 20,890 77,205 (447) 385,840 178,154 Expenditures Capital - - - - - Other 2 390 400 480 480 300 Total Expenditures 390 400 480 480 300 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 20,500 76,805 (927) 385,360 177,854 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 609,850 630,351 707,155 706,228 1,091,588 Fund Balance, End of year 630,351$ 707,155$ 706,228$ 1,091,588$ 1,269,442$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year -$ 59,568$ -$ 427,281$ 167,435$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)- - 59,568 - 427,281 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)- - - 59,568 - Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)- - - - 59,568 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)63,754 - - - - In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years 511,996 575,350 574,870 574,390 574,090 Accumulated Interest Earned 54,601 72,238 71,790 30,349 41,068 Total Revenue Available 630,351$ 707,155$ 706,228$ 1,091,588$ 1,269,442$ Notes: 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 16 Fund 127 – Police: The City's existing police facility is at capacity, and additional space is needed to serve the growing demand imposed by future development. The impact fee for police facilities is based on the relationship between the Police Department calls for service per year generated by existing development and the department's facilities' replacement cost. The funds will provide land acquisition and improvements; building construction; furniture, fixtures, equipment; technical centers, and transportation facilities for the City's Police Department. Impact fees for this fund are calculated in accordance with Resolution No. 14-128 using the average cost per call for service and the calls per unit. The impact fee per dwelling unit varies depending on the development type. Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues Fees 152,816$ 117,280$ 135,096$ 186,794$ 163,806$ Interest 14,038 16,333 138 (34,062) 1 8,163 Total Revenues 166,854 133,614 135,234 152,732 171,969 Expenditures Capital - 11,666 - - - Other 2 - 224 1,573 200 1,310 Total Expenditures - 11,890 1,573 200 1,310 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 166,854 121,724 133,661 152,532 170,659 Fund Balance, Beginning of year 346,553 513,407 635,131 768,792 921,324 Fund Balance, End of year 513,407$ 635,131$ 768,792$ 921,324$ 1,091,983$ Revenue Available: Current Fiscal Year 152,816$ 117,280$ 135,096$ 186,794$ 163,806$ Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)113,023 152,816 117,280 135,096 186,794 Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)120,240 113,023 152,816 117,280 135,096 Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)63,034 120,240 113,023 152,816 117,280 Prior Fiscal Year (5-yr Old Funds)47,769 63,034 120,240 113,023 152,816 In Excess of Five Prior Fiscal Years - 35,879 97,340 217,380 329,093 Accumulated Interest Earned 16,525 32,859 32,997 (1,065) 7,098 Total Revenue Available 513,407$ 635,131$ 768,792$ 921,324$ 1,091,983$ Notes: 2. Other expenditures consist of personnel costs, noncapital purchases and services, and administrative costs. 1. Negative Interest is caused by GASB 31 for the temporary fair value adjustment Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Last Five Fiscal Years, Ended June 30, Five-Year Revenue Test 17 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE Fees effective as of June 30, 2023: Park Land Acquisition Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $4,060 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $2,772 Residential, Mobile Home Park $2,171 Assisted Living Facility $1,349 Park Improvement Impact Fee (All Residential Development (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $3,923 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $2,678 Residential, Mobile Home Park $2,098 Assisted Living Facility $1,304 General City Drainage Fee (per net acre) $23,015 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area Fee (per net acre) Total Fee = (1) Regional Mainline + (1) Secondary Regional + (1) Master Plan Regional Mainline Fee Upper Etiwanda $7,800 San Sevaine $2,500 Lower Etiwanda $0 Secondary Regional Fee Henderson/Wardman $6,400 Hawker-Crawford $4,700 Victoria Basin $400 Upper Etiwanda Interceptor $2,000 Master Plan Fee Upper Etiwanda $8,900 San Sevaine $2,900 Lower Etiwanda $16,500 Middle Etiwanda $32,199 Library Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $762 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $521 Residential, Mobile Home Park $408 Assisted Living Facility $253 Animal Center Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $144 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $99 Residential, Mobile Home Park $77 Assisted Living Facility $48 18 Fees effective as of June 30, 2022 (Continued): Police Impact Fee Residential, Single Family (Detached) (per dwelling unit) $322 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) (per dwelling unit) $254 Residential, Mobile Home Park $155 Assisted Living Facilities (per dwelling unit) $117 Commercial/Retail KSF (per 1000 sf) $1,013 Office KSF (per 1000 sf) $317 Industrial KSF (per 1000 sf) $46 Hotel/Motel (per room) $156 Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee (per dwelling unit) (ENR) Residential, Single Family (Detached) $2,123 Residential, Multi Family (Attached) $1,449 Residential, Mobile Home Park $1,135 Assisted Living Facility $706 Transportation Development Fees Single Family Dwelling Unit (per unit) $12,708 Multi-Family Dwelling Unit (per unit) $7,625 Apartment or Condominium (per unit) $7,625 Senior Housing-Attached (Apartments or Condos) (per bedroom) $2,542 Nursing/Congregate Care (per bedroom) $2,542 Commercial (per 1,000 sf) $19,062 Industrial (per 1,000 sf) $7,625 Warehouse (per 1,000 sf) $6,354 Office/Business Park (per 1,000 sf) $15,250 Hotel/Motel (per room) $10,166 Self-Storage (per storage unit) $254 Day Care (per student) $3,177 Service Station (per gas pump) $63,540 19 Development Impact Fees Current Projects Project Phase Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Date of Completion Total Estimated Project Cost(1) Budget To Date(1) Estimated % of Project Funded with Fees(2) Parkland Acquisition Impact Fee 111 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee 113 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Drainage – Henderson/Wardman Impact Fee 115 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 116 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Construction Development Impact Fee Project Identification Impact Fee/Fund 20 Development Impact Fees Current Projects Project Phase Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Date of Completion Total Estimated Project Cost(1) Budget To Date(1) Estimated % of Project Funded with Fees(2) Etiwanda Drainage/Upper Etiwanda Impact Fee 118 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Park Improvement Impact Fee 119 Central Park - Amphitheatre In Review TBD TBD 11,000,000 1,500,000 13.64% Beryl Park East Inclusive Playground In Progress 21/22 23/24 1,156,480 772,690 66.81% Park Development Impact Fee 120 Cucamonga Canyon Trailhead In Progress 23/24 23/24 1,763,890 80,000 4.54% South Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 122 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Library Impact Fee 123 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Construction Development Impact Fee Project Identification Impact Fee/Fund 21 Development Impact Fees Current Projects Project Phase Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Date of Completion Total Estimated Project Cost(1) Budget To Date(1) Estimated % of Project Funded with Fees(2) Transportation Impact Fee 124 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing West of Etiwanda In Progress 23/24 27/28 3,112,000 1,987,000 63.85% Advance Traffic Management System Phase 2 In Progress 23/24 23/24 7,449,900 7,272,900 97.62% Etiwanda Avenue - East Side Widening In Progress 23/24 26/27 1,128,000 1,123,000 99.56% HSIP Traffic Signal Modification at Various Locations In Progress 23/24 23/24 717,400 264,400 36.86% Animal Center Impact Fee 125 Animal Center Office Reconfigure In Progress 23/24 24/25 220,000 220,000 100.00% Lower Etiwanda Drainage Impact Fee 126 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. Police Impact Fee 127 DIF fees have accumulated in excess of five years. Insufficient funds to date have been collected for the potential projects within the funding period. Projects in line with the fee program will be evaluated each reporting period to program into the CIP as sufficient funds are collected. (1) Estimated Project Cost and Budget to Date amounts are from the 2023/24 -Capital Improvement Program. Funding to Date amounts are as of June 30, 2028. Budget to Date and Funding to Date include DIF amounts only. For information on additional funding sources please see the Capital Improvement Program at www.CityofRC.us. (2) Estimated funding with DIFs may include funding that is anticipated to occur in future years and will be budgeted accordingly in future years' Capital Improvement Programs. Construction Development Impact Fee Project Identification Impact Fee/Fund 22 City Project ID Project Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Drainage Facilities (Fund 112) 1928112 Cucamonga Storm Drain Upper - Phase III 364,842 - 3,157,701 138,660 20,000 N/A Developer reimbursements for eligible capital facilities - - 356,141 - - 364,842 - 3,513,841 138,660 20,000 Community and Recreation Centers (Fund 113) 2046113 Joint Use Facility at The Resort - 11,666 - - - - 11,666 - - - Drainage - Etiwanda/San Sevaine (Fund 114) 1358114 Etiwanda Flood Control Channel 176,927 14,321 - - - 176,927 14,321 - - - Drainage - Henderson/Wardman (Fund 115) - - - - - - - - - - Etiwanda Drainage (Fund 116) N/A Developer reimbursements for eligible capital facilities 53,341 9,612 - 5,394 - 53,341 9,612 - 5,394 - Park Improvement (Fund 119) N/A Quakes Scoreboard - - - - 524,839 - - - - 524,839 Park Development (Fund 120) 1660120 Central Park - Master Plan Environmental Review 50,310 237,429 38,547 - - 1664120 Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II 52,411 32,636 3,935 4,960 - 1896120 Sports Center Relocation 100,716 - - - - N/A Park Equipment - Various Locations - - 162,851 - - 2022120 Community Dog Park - - - 457,320 250,525 203,437 270,065 205,334 462,280 250,525 Library (Fund 123) 2046123 Joint Use Facility at The Resort - 11,666 - - - - 11,666 - - - City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Impact Fee Capital Project Expenditures For Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2023 23 City Project ID Project Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Transportation (Fund 124) N/A Developer reimbursements for eligible capital facilities 149,814 1361124 Base Line Road at Interstate-15 Interchange 2,380,884 2,043 - 416 - 1515124 Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road Environmental Review 84,062 52,650 47,700 - - 1831124 Traffic Management Center Citywide Upgrade 297,044 76,939 13,679 3,000 - 1847124 Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Track Street Widening 667,443 - - - - 1888124 Traffic Signal: Miller Avenue at East Avenue 17,548 - - - - 1900124 Freeway and Arterial Synchronization Phase I 152,578 180,042 9,876 - - 1939124 Traffic Signal: 6th Street at Rochester Avenue 30,426 - - - - 1940124 Traffic Signal: Milliken Avenue at 5th Street 27,979 - - - - 1941124 Traffic Signal: Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard 31,758 - - - - 1956124 Day Creek Boulevard: Upgrade Left Turn Phases - 74,805 266,825 4,730 - 1957124 Traffic Signal: 6th Street at Hellman Avenue 34,478 31,232 646,590 376,589 - 1958124 Traffic Signal: East Avenue at Highland Avenue 31,636 15,936 3,804 5,696 - 1982124 Advance Traffic Management System - Phase I 41,559 316,578 1,054,271 368,907 41,713 1989124 Milliken Avenue - Upgrade Left Turn Phases 12,814 6,227 - - - 1994124 Traffic Signal Modification - Vineyard at San Bernardino 49,490 1996124 Arrow Route: Upgrade Left Turn Phases - 60,834 152,760 - - 2002124 Etiwanda East Side Widening 41,740 146,153 6,595 2004124 Advance Traffic Management System - Phase 2 20,169 12,321 264,400 3,810,209 817,286 2,456,717 917,813 312,708 Police (Fund 127) 2046127 Joint Use Facility at The Resort - 11,666 - - - - 11,666 - - - City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Impact Fee Capital Project Expenditures For Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2023 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Michael Smith, Captain Jeff Allison, Lieutenant Karen Hunt, Sheriff's Service Specialist SUBJECT:Consideration of Appropriation in the Amount of $46,090 from the Citizen Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program State Fund Balance and Authorization to Purchase 12 Public Safety Video Network (PSVN) Cameras to Be Added to Or Replace End of Life Cameras at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize the appropriation of funds from the COPS Program Grant-State fund balance and the purchase of 12 PSVN cameras in the amount of $46,090. These cameras will be added to or replace end of life cameras at the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. BACKGROUND: In 2013, the City Council authorized the initial phase of the PSVN which was installed around the Victoria Gardens Shopping mall. In the years that followed, the PSVN has expanded to other locations including the Metrolink Parking Facility, City Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library facilities, and all four high schools located within the City. The next phase of the PSVN project involves the integration of existing City monitored camera platforms that may not be compatible with the PSVN system or cameras that are end of life and failing. The Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter needs to be equipped with additional cameras, have older cameras replaced, and undergo a system upgrade so that it can be brought onto the PSVN. Recent activity near or at the location brings to light how vulnerable any location can be to crime. The camera system will provide another layer of security both as a deterrent and to aid in capturing evidence should a crime occur. ANALYSIS: The proposed installations are an expansion of the existing PSVN program footprint envisioned for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The 12 PSVN cameras selected for this location were chosen for their ability to best capture activity inside or outside of the building during both daylight and evening hours. Page 52 of 273 Page 2 2 1 2 9 FISCAL IMPACT: The requested appropriation of $46,090 is for 12 PSVN cameras, all parts, installation materials, freight, labor, and product warranty for one year. The project will be completed during Fiscal Year 2023/2024. The appropriations requested are as follows: 1354701-5207 Capital Supplies $46,090 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This project supports City Council Core Values to promote and enhance a safe and healthy community for all and intentionally embrace and anticipate the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Convergint Quotation Page 53 of 273 540 S. Jefferson St., Placentia,California 92870 Mobile (714) 883-0941 jake.bargas@convergint.com June 30, 2023 City of Rancho Cucamonga Quotation:JB29506637P Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter 11780 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 License/Cert C-10 License #986407 Attention: Karen Hunt Reference: Animal Shelter Security Enhancements On behalf of Convergint’s global network of colleagues, I would like to personally thank you for providing Convergint with the opportunity to present this proposal addressing your electronic security needs. We are confident that this proven solution is both comprehensive and customized to meet your needs today, and in the future. Convergint’s reputation for service excellence is backed by a foundational commitment to our core value of service, and we have been recognized as the #1 Systems Integrator by SDM Magazine. This recognition reflects the strong relationships Convergint has developed with the industry’s top technology manufacturers, and our history of success with providing exceptional service to our customers. Our guiding principle has always been to be our customers’ best service provider. Our dedicated and certified team of professionals strives to uphold our customer-focused, service-based mission to make a daily difference for our customers. After achieving a successful on-time and on-budget project installation, Convergint will provide you with the industry’s best ongoing service, including our 24/7 customer portal iCare, designed to track service work orders, project progress, and provide you with detailed metric reporting for continuous improvement. The following security proposal is specifically designed to meet your needs. As your single point of contact, please feel free to contact me with any additional questions you may have. Thank you again for trusting Convergint as your partner. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 54 of 273 Scope of Work Convergint Technologies' scope of work includes furnishing, installing, programming and commissioning the material listed in the attached bill of materials (BOM) as outlined below and with regards to the data listed in the clarifications and exclusions section of this proposal. Proposal complies with prevailing wage labor requirements. Convergint will furnish and install (12) Hanwha IP cameras in addition (1) Fluidmesh Point to Point radio setup at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. Convergint will furnish all required cat6 cabling to each device following the City of Rancho Cucamonga cabling standards. Convergint will terminate cable at both ends and will furnish and install (1) 24 port patch panel with jacks inside the existing IDF rack inside the IDF room. Convergint specialist will IP each camera and radio for transition over to the City IT for programming into the Genetec system. Convergint will program the Fluidmesh radios and align the radios for line of sight. Convergint will test and commission the system during project closeout. Genetec licensing and loading into Genetec software to be completed by City of Rancho Cucamonga IT. Convergint will furnish and install (12) Hanwha IP cameras at the following locations: - Front Entrance Cameras (3). Cameras will be 2MP dome cameras mounted on the front entrance of the building. - Interior Lobby Cameras (2). Cameras will be 2MP dome cameras mounted in the lobby of the building. - West Facing 180 Camera. Camera will be an 8MP 180 degree camera mounted on the west side of the building. - Northwest Multisensor Camera. Camera will be a 360 degree multisensor camera mounted on the northwest pole corner of the building in a pole mount configuration. Camera will be powered via a POE injector from the nearest electrical source and will communicate via point to point radio to the main building. Electrical to be provided by the city. - Northwest Point to Point Radio. Point to Point Radio will be a Fluidmesh radio mounted on the exterior of the electrical room and powered via a poe injector. Radio will be aimed at the main building. Main building will have a point to point radio mounted on the building to receive data and be powered via cat6 to the IDF. - Roof Multisensor Camera. Camera will be a 360 degree multisensory camera mounted on the roof pole of the building in a pole mount configuration. - Exterior Awning 180 Camera. Camera will be an 8MP 180 degree camera mounted on the exterior wall of the building under the awning of the north side of the building. - Northeast Vehicle Entrance Camera. Camera will be a 2MP dome camera mounted on the northeast building viewing the north vehicle entrance. - East Entrance Corner Multisensor Camera. Camera will be a 270 degree multisensor camera mounted in a corner mount configuration. - Southeast Corner Multisensor Camera. Camera will be a 270 degree multisensor camera mounted in a corner mount configuration. Page 55 of 273 Note: Drawing below is a sample illustration. Actual camera placement and viewing angles/coverage may vary. Convergint to provide as-built documentation during project closeout. Materials Line Qty Part Description Unit Price Extended Price 1 Cameras 2 2.00 XND- 6081RV WISENET X+ 2MP NW IR DOMECAMERA DN (ICR), WDR (150DB/ 120DB) POE WHITE $729.72 $1,459.44 3 4.00 XNV- 6081R WISENET X+ 2M NW DOME CAMERADN (ICR), WDR (150DB /120DB) POE $790.54 $3,162.16 4 4.00 HAN- PNM9084R QZ1 2MP X 4 outdoor Dome, PTRZ w/IR $1,751.35 $7,005.40 5 4.00 SBP- 300WMW1 WALL MOUNT ACCESSORY (WHITE),COMPATIBLE WITH WHITEHANGING CAPS $48.04 $192.16 6 4.00 SBP- 317HMW CAP ADAPTER, PF 1 1/2, WHITEFOR PNM- 9084RQZ/9085RQZ $45.60 $182.40 Page 56 of 273 Line Qty Part Description Unit Price Extended Price 7 2.00 SBP- 300KMW1 CORNER MOUNT ADAPTER (WHITE)USE W/ SBP-300WMW/SBP-300WMW1TO MOUNT A CORNER $48.04 $96.08 8 2.00 SBP- 300PMW1 ACCESSORY POLE MOUNTALUMINUM $48.04 $96.08 9 2.00 SBP- 300BW WALL MOUNT BASE, WHITEFOR SBP- 300WMW1 MOUNT $54.12 $108.24 10 2.00 PNM- 9031RV NETWORK VANDAL OUTDOORMULTI- SENSOR DOME CAMERA,PANORAMIC VIEW WITH $1,641.89 $3,283.78 11 2.00 SBV- 253WCW WEATHER CAP COMPATIBLE WITH:PNM- 9031RV / PNM-9022V $21.28 $42.56 12 Radios 13 1.00 FM- PONTE-50 P2P WIRELESS KIT, 4.9-5.9GHZ50 MBPS THRUPUT, 2X2 MIMO ANTPOE, 2 FM1200 RADIOS $1,000.93 $1,000.93 14 1.00 FM-AES AES PLUG-IN ENABLES AES128-BIT HARDWARE-BASED ENCRYPTON 1 FLUIDMESH PROD $334.01 $334.01 15 1.00 FM-SUP- Y-PONTE FLNE FM-SUP-Y-PONTE MAINTSOFTWARE SUPPORT CONTRACT 1PER YEAR FLUIDCARE $83.24 $83.24 16 1.00 FM-BRKT POLE/WALL MOUNTING BRACKETFOR PONTE/VOLO RADIOS $55.68 $55.68 17 1.00 FM-POE- INL Low Voltage PoE Injector 12-24V DC $171.38 $171.38 18 1.00 NB121005 -10F 12x10x5 Inch 120 VAC Weatherproof Enclosure with Cooling Fan $486.47 $486.47 19 Cable 20 3.00 CMR- 00424BKT- 7RB-06 23-4P UTP-CMR SOL BC CAT6E PE/PVC BLUE JKT REEL IN BOX LANMARK 2000 $390.63 $1,171.89 21 1.00 69270- U24 24-PORT QUICKPORT PATCH PANEL KITTED W/EXTREME CAT6 JACKS BLACK 1U W/CBL MGMT $261.17 $261.17 22 12.00 62460-3L CBL ASSY MOD 24-4PR STRANDED CAT6 T568A/B EXTREME 6+ 3FT BLUE/BLUE BOOT $6.27 $75.24 Equipment Total $19,268.31 Total Labor $21,045.28 Miscellaneous Costs $2,857.14 Freight/Warranty $1,425.98 Tax if applicable $1,493.29 Total Project Price $46,090.00 Page 57 of 273 Clarifications and Exclusion 1. All work proposed herein, shall be performed during normal business hours Monday through Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Prevailing wage labor is included. 2. Low voltage wiring shall be installed via open air code approved methods. 3. Provision or installation of conduit, wire, boxes, fittings or other installation materials is included. 120v power to be provided by the city. 4. Permits or associated fees are not included. 5. Customer to provide static IP addresses and network connections at panel locations. 6. Customer to provide a secured staging & storage area for project related materials. 7. Pricing assumes that electronic Auto CAD files are available from customer for our use in creating submittal drawings. 8. Proposal does not include licenses for cameras or programming into Genetec system. 9. Twenty-Five percent (25%) of the proposed sell price shall be payable to Convergint for project mobilization. Mobilization shall be invoiced and due upon customer acceptance of this proposal. 10. Anything in the Contract Documents notwithstanding, in no event shall either Contractor or Subcontractor be liable for special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, including commercial loss, loss of use, or lost profits, even if either party has been advised of the possibility of such damages. 11. Convergint reserves the right to negotiate mutually acceptable contract terms and conditions with customer by making mutually agreeable changes to the formal contract included in the Bid Documents. 12. Customer acknowledges that supply-chain and shipping difficulties may result in unavoidable delays in deliveries of materials despite timely placement of orders and efforts by Convergint and its suppliers to avoid such delays. Customer agrees to provide Convergint with reasonable extensions of time to the extent of any such delays and Convergint agrees to make reasonable efforts to avoid or minimize such delays. Customer further acknowledges that the above-referenced supply-chain and shipping difficulties may result in unanticipated increases to Convergint’s proposal pricing on products covered by this quote or any resulting agreement and that such increases may occur between the time this quote is provided, or any resulting contract is executed and the time when Convergint actually purchases the products covered by this quote or a resulting agreement. Customer agrees that it will pay any such increase in Convergint’s initial pricing of obtaining the products above the proposal pricing upon which the quote or agreement was based, by change order or otherwise, and Convergint agrees that it shall make commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any such increase. Page 58 of 273 Total Project Investment:$ 46,090.00 Thank you for considering Convergint for your Security needs. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me immediately. If you would like to proceed with the scope of work as outlined in this proposal, please sign below and return to my attention. Sincerely, Jake Bargas Convergint By signing below, I accept this proposal and agree to the Terms and Conditions contained herein Karen Hunt June 30, 2023 Customer Name (Printed)Date Authorized Signature Title Page 59 of 273 Convergint Technologies’ Install Terms & Conditions Version 1.12 June 2020 Convergint Technologies Install Terms and Conditions Throughout this Installation Proposal, the term, “Convergint” refers to the Convergint Technologies affiliate operating in the state/province in which the work is being performed. SECTION 1. THE WORK This Installation Proposal takes precedence over and supersedes any and all prior proposals, correspondence, and oral agreements or representations relating to the work set forth in the attached scope of work (“Work”). This Installation Proposal commences on the Start Date as specified in the attached scope of work and represents the entire agreement between Convergint and Customer (the “Agreement”). In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force. Convergint agrees in accordance with the mutually agreed project schedule: a.To submit shop drawings, product data, samples and similar submittals if required in performing the Work; b.To pay for all labor, materials, equipment, tools, supervision, programming, testing, startup and documentation required to perform the Work in accordance with the Agreement; c.Secure and pay for permits and governmental fees, licenses and inspections necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work, unless local regulations provide otherwise; and d.Hire subcontractors and order material to perform part of the Work, if necessary, while remaining responsible for the completion of theWork. Customer agrees in accordance with the mutually agreed project schedule, and at no cost to Convergint: a.To promptly approve submittals provided by Convergint; b.To provide access to all areas of the facility which are necessary to complete the Work; c.To supply suitable electrical service as required by Convergint;and d.That in the event of any emergency or systems failure, reasonable safety precautions will be taken by Customer to protect life and property during the period of time from when Convergint is first notified of the emergency or failure and until such time that Convergint notifies the Customer that the systems are operational or that the emergency has cleared. No monitoring services are included in the Work. Any such services shall be governed by a separate agreement. Title to the Work, including any materials comprising the Work, shall pass to Customer as the Work is completed and the materials are incorporated into the Work at Customer's site. If materials are earlier stored on Customer's site pursuant to agreement between Customer and Convergint, title with respect to such materials shall pass to Customer upon delivery to Customer site. SECTION 2. PRICING Pricing and amounts proposed shall remain valid for 30 days unless otherwise specified. Price includes only the material listed based on Convergint’s interpretation of plans and specifications unless noted otherwise. Additional equipment, unless negotiated prior to order placement, will be billed accordingly. Sales taxes, (and in Canada GST/PST) and any other taxes assessed on Customer shall be added to the price upon invoice to Customer. SECTION 3. INVOICE REMITTANCE AND PAYMENT If the Work is performed over more than a month, Convergint will invoice Customer each month for the Work performed during the previous month. Customer agrees to pay the amount due to Convergint as invoiced, within thirty (30) days of the date of such invoice. If the Work is completed in less than one month, Customer agrees to pay Convergint in full after the Work has been performed within thirty (30) days of the date of being invoiced. Invoices shall not include or be subject to a project retention percentage. If Customer is overdue in any payment to Convergint, Convergint shall be entitled to suspend the Work until paid, and charge Customer an interest rate 1 and 1/2% percent per month, (or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less), and may avail itself of any other legal or equitable remedy. Customer shall reimburse Convergint costs incurred in collecting any amounts that become overdue, including attorney fees, court costs and any other reasonable expenditure. SECTION 4. WARRANTY Convergint provides the following SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE warranty to the Customer: For the period of one (1) year, commencing at the earlier of substantial completion of the Work, or first beneficial use, (“Warranty Period”): a.That Work performed under this Agreement will be ofgood quality; b.That all equipment will be new unless otherwise required or permitted by this Agreement; c.That the Work will be free from defects not inherent in the quality required or permitted; and d.That the Work will conform to the requirements ofthis Agreement. The Customer’s sole remedy for any breach of this warranty is that Convergint shall remove, replace and/or repair at its own expense any defective or improper Work, discovered within the Warranty Period, provided Convergint is notified in writing of any defect within the Warranty Period. Any equipment or products installed by Convergint in the course of performing the Work hereunder shall only carry such warranty as is provided by the manufacturer thereof, which Convergint hereby assigns to Customer without recourse to Convergint. Upon request of Customer, Convergint will use commercially reasonable efforts to assist Customer in enforcing any such third-party warranties. This warranty excludes remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse, modifications not executed by Convergint, improper or insufficient maintenance, improper operation, or normal wear and tear under normal usage. NO FURTHER WARRANTIES OR GUARANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY GOODS OR SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. SECTION 5. CHANGES Without invalidating this Agreement or any bond given hereunder, Customer or Convergint may request changes in the Work. Any changes to the Agreement shall be in writing signed by both Customer and Convergint. If Customer orders any additional work or causes any material interference with Convergint’s performance of the Work, Convergint shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in the time for performance and in the Agreement Price, including a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit. SECTION 6. FORCE MAJEURE Neither Customer nor Convergint shall be responsible or liable for, shall incur expense for, or be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement because of any delay in the performance of their respective obligations pursuant to this Agreement due solely to circumstances beyond their reasonable control (“Force Majeure”) and without the fault or negligence of the party experiencing such delay. A Force Majeure event shall include, but not be limited to: accident, fire, storm, water, flooding, negligence, vandalism, power failure, installation of incompatible equipment, improper operating procedures, source current fluctuations or lighting. If performance by either party is delayed due to Force Majeure, the time for that performance shall be extended for a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of the delay. Any Services required by Convergint due to reasons set forth in this Force Majeure Section shall be charged to Customer in addition to any amounts due under this Agreement. SECTION 7. INSURANCE Convergint shall have the following insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement, and shall provide certificates of insurance to the Customer prior to beginning work hereunder: Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence /aggregate Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate $2,000,000 general aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate Excess/Umbrella Liability $10,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate All insurance policies carried by Convergint shall be primary to and noncontributory with the insurance afforded to Customer and shall name the Customer as “additional insured”, with respect to liability arising out of work performed by Convergint, as applicable, but only to the extent of liabilities falling within the indemnity obligations of Convergint, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Convergint shall provide to the Customer no less than thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the termination or cancellation of any such insurance policy. SECTION 8. INDEMNIFICATION Convergint shall indemnify and hold Customer harmless from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses, attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or to destruction of tangible property, but only to the extent caused by: a) the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Convergint or Convergint’s employees or subcontractors while on Customer’s site, or b) the malfunction of the equipment supplied by Convergint, or c) Convergint’s breach of this Agreement. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER CONVERGINT OR CUSTOMER BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY HERETO FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING COMMERCIAL LOSS, LOSS OF USE OR LOST PROFITS, EVEN IF THAT PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT WILL CONVERGINT BE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER FOR ANY AMOUNTS IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNTS PAID BY CUSTOMER TO CONVERGINT. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that Convergint is or may be providing intrusion products which are designed to provide notification of certain events but are not intended to be guarantees or insurers against any acts for which they are supposed to monitor or inform. Convergint’s indemnification obligation pursuant to Section 8 herein, does not apply to the extent the loss indemnified against is caused by any intrusion product or software provided by but not manufactured by Convergint. Convergint shall have no liability to Customer for any losses to the extent such losses are caused by the intrusion product or software. Customer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Convergint, from and against all claims, lawsuits, damages, losses and expenses by persons not a party to this Agreement, but only to the extent caused by such intrusion product or software provided by but not manufactured by Convergint. SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW, SAFETY, & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state/province in which the Work is being performed. Convergint agrees to comply with all laws and regulations relating to or governing its provision of the Work. Convergint shall comply with all safety related laws and regulations and with the safety program of the Customer, provided such program is supplied to Convergint prior to beginning work. In the event that Convergint discovers or suspects the presence of hazardous materials, or unsafe working conditions at Customer’s facility where the Work is to be performed, Convergint is entitled to stop the Work at that facility if such hazardous materials, or unsafe working conditions were not provided by or caused by Convergint. Convergint in its sole discretion shall determine when it is “safe” to return to perform the Work at Customer’s facility. Convergint shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removing or disposal of or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the Customer’s facility. Customer shall indemnify and hold harmless Convergint from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or resulting from undisclosed hazardous materials, or unsafe working conditions at Customer’s facility. Customer acknowledges that applicable law or regulation may limit Customer’s rights and impose obligations with respect to information or data obtained using software capable of obtaining what may in certain circumstances be characterized as biometric information (individually and collectively, the “Software”) and agrees that Customer is solely responsible to ensure its own compliance with such laws or regulations. Customer shall completely indemnify, defend (including pay attorneys’ fees and disbursements), and hold harmless Convergint, its affiliates, and any employees, agents, contractors or representatives of any of the foregoing from and against any and all losses, liability, damages, penalties, expenses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action, judgments (finally awarded) or settlements (individually and collectively, “Liabilities”) arising from or related to any intentional or negligent acts or omissions of Customer or any of its agents, affiliates, employees, or representatives arising from or related to the Software, any hardware, software, or other services associated with the Software, or the use of any of the foregoing by or on behalf of Customer, including but not limited to those arising from or related to Customer’s failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations related to its use of the Software or any hardware, software, or other services associated with the Software, including but not limited to the Customer’s failure to obtain any necessary consents from affected individuals or provide any necessary disclosures or protections with respect to the information of such individuals under any applicable privacy or data security law, but excluding matters for which Convergint has agreed to indemnify Customer from and against third party claims for copyright and trade secret infringement under the terms of the End User License Agreement for the Software between Convergint and Customer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Customer and Convergint agree that Liabilities suffered by a third party (other than an affiliate of Convergint) which are an element of loss subject to indemnification under this paragraph shall be deemed direct damages. SECTION 10. DISPUTES In the event of any dispute between Convergint and Customer, Convergint and Customer shall first attempt to resolve the dispute in the field, but if that is not successful, then in a meeting between authorized officers of each company. If settlement attempts are not successful, then the dispute shall be decided exclusively by arbitration. Such arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association currently in effect and shall be a final binding resolution of the issues presented between the parties. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS Neither party to this Agreement shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. Convergint may assign this Agreement to any of its parents, subsidiaries or affiliated companies or any entity majority owned by Convergint. Notices shall be in writing and addressed to the other party, in accordance with the names and addresses of the parties as shown above. All notices shall be effective upon receipt by the party to whom the notice was sent. A waiver of the terms hereunder by one party to the other party shall not be effective unless in writing and signed by a person with authority to commit the Customer or Convergint and delivered to the non-waiving party according to the notice provision herein. No waiver by Customer or Convergint shall operate as a continuous waiver, unless the written waiver specifically states that it is a continuous waiver of the terms stated in that waiver. The Sections regarding invoicing, warranty, and indemnity, and disputes shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Page 60 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development Aracely Estrada, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 003 to the Professional Services Agreement with Civic Solutions for Contract Planning Services, to extend the contract through June 30, 2024, and increase the total contract cost by $122,150 to be funded from account 1001314-5300 and 1016301- 5300 (Contract Services). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve and execute contract amendment number three for contract number 2022-071 with Civic Solutions, Inc. BACKGROUND: On July 15, 2022, the City entered into a one-year contract/Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Civic Solutions, Inc. for contract planning project management and contract planning services, to fill a gap caused by a series of planning vacancies. Due to the City’s continued need for their services, amendment number one was executed increasing the contract from $90,000 to $231,050 and subsequently, amendment number two was executed extending the term of the agreement by one year, to June 14, 2024. ANALYSIS: Since entering into the PSA with Civic Solutions on July 15, 2022, PED’s staffing vacancies have fluctuated and as of recent, have not returned to full capacity. Thus, PED continues to necessitate the services offered by Civic Solutions to fill the technical knowledge gap created by the vacant Planning positions while PED continues to actively work on the recruitment process. PED staff are extremely satisfied with the services provided by Civic Solutions, Inc. over the last 17 months. They are currently managing several large projects, most of which are in the final stages of review. PED would like to retain the existing contract staff onboard to provide continuity to project applicants as they approach the end of the development review process. Most projects are expected to be completed before the end of the fiscal year. In addition, they are working on several General Plan implementation items that are nearing completion, such as the Epicenter Master Plan and Civic Center Master Plan. The contract amendment increases the total contract amount by $122,150 for a total of $353,200. The contract amendment also extends the terms through the end of the fiscal year, June 30, 2024, rather than ending on June 14, 2024, as originally approved. This will eliminate potential disruptions in services. Page 61 of 273 2 1 4 4 FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the continued utilization of contract planning services of $122,150 will be paid through various sources, including existing funds in account 101314-5300 (Contract Services) which have not been expended; realized savings from an Associate Planner vacancy, and lastly; through funds in account 1016301-5300 (Fund 16) which are earmarked for General Plan related projects and will be used accordingly through contract planning services. No appropriation is needed to fund this contract amendment. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: The execution of this contract supports the City Council’s Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring that adequate technical and staff support is available to provide high quality services to the community. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 62 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Ray Casey, Interim Public Works Services Director Richard Favela, Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Superintendent Albert Lopez, Fleet Supervisor Lindsay McElwain, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fuel Equipment Services, Inc (DBA Fuel Serv) for Fuel Island Maintenance to Extend the Term of the Contract through June 30, 2024 in an Amount Not to Exceed $60,000 for FY 2023/2024. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council and Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District approve Amendment No. 8 to contract CO# 18-125 with Fuel Equipment Services, Inc (DBA Fuel Serv) extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2024, in an amount not to exceed $60,000 for fuel island maintenance for FY 2023/2024. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department (PWSD) Streets Division and Fire District have entrusted Fuel Serv with fuel island maintenance services for the City and RCFPD’s nine fuel stations since 2018. For FY 2023/2024, PWSD sought a seven-month contract term extension through January 31, 2024 to allow sufficient time for a new bid process. Procurement released RFP #23/24-001 on August 24, 2023 via Planet Bids for fuel island maintenance services. Despite a 60-day bidding window, the bid closed on October 16, 2023 without receiving any submissions. Procurement reposted the bid on October 18, 2023 after additional prospective bidder outreach. However, the revised bid timeframe now exceeds the remaining term of the existing contract with Fuel Serv. To ensure fuel island maintenance services continue during the bid process timeline, it is essential to extend the term of the contract through the end of the fiscal year. Allowing for an appropriate time for a bidding process while avoiding interruption in fuel island maintenance services is essential for safety. ANALYSIS: If approved, Amendment No. 8 to contract CO# 18-125 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2024, through the remainder of FY 2023/2024 and will allow sufficient time to complete the bidding process and award a contract beginning FY 2024/2025. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk’s Office. Page 63 of 273 Page 2 2 1 3 3 FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2023/2024 Budget for Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Contract Services (1001317- 5300) which funds the fuel island maintenance services is $96,660. RCFPD funds Fuel System Maint/Repair (3281529-5304) for $33,000. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 64 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation, Contract No. 2022-143 (Project), as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $4,983,251; 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $4,751,100, six (6) months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received; 5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the Project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On November 16, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Gentry Brother’s, Inc., in the amount of $4,751,100, plus a 5% contingency in the amount of $237,555 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A vicinity map illustrating the various neighborhood streets that received pavement overlay is included as Attachment 1. A copy of the November 16, 2022, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. The scope of work consisted of cold milling, routing and crack sealing, asphalt concrete overlay, adjusting existing manholes, clean-outs, water meters, and valves to new grade, installation of pavement markers and striping, upgrading existing curb ramps and related items of work per plans. ANALYSIS: The subject Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the Project is a Page 65 of 273 Page 2 2 1 2 3 result of four (4) Change Orders, including the final balancing statement, which are summarized below: Change order No. 1: Add Forta-Fi reinforcing fibers to city approved asphalt. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $18,155. Change Order No.2: Additional crack seal materials for the additional street work. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $19,000. Change Order No.3: Paint retaining curb yellow with glass beads. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $200. Change Order No.4: The balancing statement for the Project. The balancing statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The notable change is an increase in the amount of $194,796 resulting from an increase in the final quantities of asphalt concrete placed and final number of utility adjustments. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $3,640,555 was budgeted in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 from the State Gas Tax Fund (Fund 174) and Measure I Fund (Fund 177), for the Project. In addition, $355,000 was budgeted from the Measure I Fund (Fund 177) for ADA Access Ramps, and $600,000 for pavement rehabilitation. These funds were used to cover all modifications of existing curb ramps required by ADA regulations. Further, this Project incorporated concrete repairs within the Project area. A portion of funds budgeted for the FY 2022/23 Citywide Concrete Repair Project in the amount of $640,000 from the following three (3) funds: General Fund (Fund 001), Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198) and Measure I (Fund 177) were used to make these repairs. See the table below for a breakdown of costs by account. A total amount of $5,235,555 was available for the local asphalt overlay project. The total funding for this Project is identified under Capital Improvement Project account numbers and in the amount listed below: Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 11743035650/1022174-0 Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (174) Local Street Rehab $3,640,555 11773035650-1022177-0 Measure I Fund (177) Local Street Rehab $600,000 11773035650/1150177-0 Measure I Fund (177) ADA Ramps $355,000 10013185650/1991001-0 General Fund (001)Citywide Concrete Repair $290,000 11983035650/1991198-0 Infrastructure Fund (198) Citywide Concrete Repair $250,000 11773035650/1991177-0 Measure I Fund (177) Citywide Concrete Repair $100,000 Total Project Funding $5,235,555 Page 66 of 273 Page 3 2 1 2 3 The final Project cost is $5,228,531 as shown below: Expenditure Amount Final Construction Contract $4,983,251 Construction Inspection Services $62,480 Construction Materials Testing $54,600 Construction Survey Services $88,200 Tree Removal and Trimming Services $40,000 Total Project Cost $5,228,531 A total of $7,024, remains in the budget for this Project and will be returned to the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 174), Measure I (Fund 177), and Infrastructure (Fund 198) balances to be used for future Capital Improvement Projects. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This Project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 67 of 273 ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT# 800‐2022‐03 FY 2022/23 LOCAL OVERLAY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 68 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Mario Estrada, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the Southeast Corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court per Improvement Agreement, Related to Parcel Map 20098, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Parcel Map 20098 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Bond six (6) months after City Council approval; and 4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map 20098 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26, 2019, for the subdivision of an existing 27,201 square foot residential lot into two (2) residential lots, located on the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on December 2, 2020, to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine (9) months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Jaime A. Campos, submitted the Faithful Performance Bond (Cash Deposit) and Labor and Material Bond (Cash Deposit) to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With completion of the improvements, the City will Page 69 of 273 Page 2 2 1 3 9 retain 10% of the Labor and Material Bond as the Maintenance Bond for the warranty period of one (1) year from the final inspection. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 70 of 273 ATTACHMENT 1 SUBTPM20098 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Page 71 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 2023-0042 (Project), as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $1,167,985; 3. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the Project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion, subject to any withholding requirements due to any outstanding stop notices, liens, assessments, etc.; 4. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 5. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,069,056, six (6) months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and there are no outstanding payment disputes between the general contractor and subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, etc.; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On April 19, 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Gentry Brother’s, Inc. in the amount of $1,069,056, plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $106,905 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A vicinity map illustrating the limit of the Project is included as Attachment 1. A copy of the April 19, 2023, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. Hermosa Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street was generally constructed to its ultimate roadway width except a small portion immediately north of the ARTE Apartments where the roadway width narrowed along the east side of the road. The Project Page 72 of 273 Page 2 2 1 2 4 included street widening, construction of bulb-out curbs, parking stalls, concrete stairs, stamped concrete along the slope, trees removal, new sidewalks plus curb and gutter, green bike lane, upgrades to all existing ramps and pedestrian push buttons to comply with the new ADA regulations, weed kill, routing and crack sealing, asphalt cold milling, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, adjusting of existing manholes and valves to new grade, restriping and installation of new raised pavement markers. ANALYSIS: The subject Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the Project is a result of four (4) Change Orders, including the final balancing statement, which are summarized below: Change Order No.1: Retaining walls to protect existing seven (7) power poles. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $27,500. Change Order No.2: Stamped colored concrete along the east side parkway and three (3) concrete stairs including steel handrailing. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $98,000. Change Order No.3: Steel hand railing and concrete stair lights. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $6,000. Change Order No.4: The balancing statement for the Project. The balancing statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The notable change is a deduction in the amount of $32,571 resulting from a reduction of Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix in the final quantities placed under contract. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $910,757 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2022/23 from the State Gas Tax Fund (Fund 174) and Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198). A $400,000 contribution from the Providence II ARTE Apartments, LLC was also provided per the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Providence II ARTE Apartments, LLC under Contract No. 2023-001 and was deposited into Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198) to partially cover the widening portion of the construction costs for the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening. Funding for the Hermosa Avenue Project was identified under Capital Improvements Project account numbers and in the amounts listed below: Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 11743035650/2075174-0 Gas Tax Fund (174) Hermosa Avenue Rehab $562,500 11983035650/1976198-0 Infrastructure Fund (198) Hermosa Avenue Widening $348,257 11983035650/1976198-0 Infrastructure Fund (198) ARTE Contribution Hermosa Avenue Widening $400,000 Total Project Funding $1,310,757 Page 73 of 273 Page 3 2 1 2 4 The final Project cost for construction is $1,301,090 as shown below: Expenditure Amount Final Construction Contract $1,167,985 Construction Inspection Services $67,720 Construction Materials testing $23,920 Construction Survey Services $41,465 Total Project Cost $1,301,090 A total of $9,667, remains in the budget for this Project and will be returned to the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 174) fund balance to be used for future Capital Improvement Projects. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This Project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 74 of 273 ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT# 800-2023-01 "HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT” From Foothill Boulevard to Church Street NOT TO SCALE Project Site Project Site Page 75 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Mario Estrada, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the East Side of East Avenue and South of Banyan Street per Improvement Agreement, Related to Tract Map 20334, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Tract No. 20334 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Bond six (6) months after City Council approval; and 4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 20334 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 26, 2021, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots, located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on June 1, 2022, to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine (9) months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Manning Homes, East Ave, LLC, submitted the Faithful Performance Bond (No. PB00618100124) and Labor and Material Bond (No. PB00618100124) to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With completion of the improvements, the City will retain 10% of the Labor and Material Bond as the Maintenance Bond for the warranty period of one (1) year from the final inspection. Page 76 of 273 Page 2 2 1 3 8 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 77 of 273 ATTACHMENT 1 SUBTT20334 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Page 78 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Mario Estrada, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Final Map for Tract 20120, an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Resolutions Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R, and into Street Light Maintenance District No.1 and No.4, Located on the North Side of Foothill Boulevard and West of Milliken Avenue at 11290 Foothill Boulevard, Related to Case No’s. SUBTT20120 and DRC2021-00120. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-118), (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-119), AND (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-120) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the Final Map for Tract 20120; 2. Approve the Improvement Agreement for related public improvements and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Agreement; 3. Accept security in the form of bonds for completion of the related public improvements. 4. Approve the plans and specifications for the related public improvements on file with the City Engineer; and 5. Adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R, and Street Light Maintenance District No.1 and No.4. BACKGROUND: On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTT20120 to subdivide 17.2 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and west of Milliken Avenue, generally located at 11290 Foothill Boulevard. Case No. SUBTT20120 was approved with a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including street improvements, curb and gutter, driveway approaches, streetlights, street trees, and storm drain improvements and that the land be annexed into the appropriate special districts. ANALYSIS: The developer, WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, has submitted an Improvement Agreement and securities to guarantee construction of the off-site public improvements in the following amounts: Page 79 of 273 Page 2 2 1 3 7 Faithful Performance Bond Amount: $1,646,000 Labor and Material Bond Amount: $1,646,000 Additionally, the developer submitted the Final Map for Tract 20120 for consideration of approval, and staff has determined that the Final Map is in substantial conformity with the approved Tentative Tract Map, conditions of approval, and local and State subdivision laws. Approval of this item by the Council would approve the Improvement Agreement, accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements, approve the Final Map for Tract 20120 and allow for its recording with the County Recorder, and adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R, and Street Light Maintenance District No.1 and No.4. Copies of the Improvement Agreement are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. ENVIRONMENTAL ALYSIS: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, on April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission found that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan Update (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor–High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non- residential development at a Floor Area Ration (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one (1) large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale. B. The proposed Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor-High” and would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T&B Planning. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R: $ 195,869.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1: $ 11,923.67 Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4: $ 9,716.08 Page 80 of 273 Page 3 2 1 3 7 The developer will be installing 66 new street trees and 11 new streetlights that will be maintained by the City. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality development that promotes a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution LMD 4-R Attachment 3 - Resolution SLD 1 Attachment 4 - Resolution SLD 4 Page 81 of 273 ATTACHMENT 1 SUBTT20120 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Page 82 of 273 ATTACHMENT 2 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 1 of 5 4 2 2 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR SUBTT20120 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”);and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 83 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 2 of 5 4 2 2 9 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6 day of December 2023. Page 84 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 3 of 5 4 2 2 9 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 The legal description of the Property is: Being a Subdivision of Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 15424, per Plat Recorded in Book 191, Pages 46 through 48, Inclusive of Parcel Maps, and Parcel A and Parcel B of Instrument No. 2018-0288572 of Official Records, Recorded August 8, 2018, all in the County of San Bernardino, Office of the County Recorder of Said County. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1077-422-51 1077-422-55 1077-422-98 1077-422-99 1090-121-38 1090-121-39 Page 85 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 4 of 5 4 2 2 9 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2023/24 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community): Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the “Maintenance District”) represents paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including those within the parks and paseos, includes but is not limited to, skating, restroom, picnic and playground facility maintenance, fence repair and replacement, and irrigation and lighting systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement and sport field maintenance. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and in a safe, healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The parks consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park. In addition, it is the City’s intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20120: Sixty-Six (66) Street Trees. Page 86 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 5 of 5 4 2 2 9 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2023/24 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $417.01 for the fiscal year 2023/24. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) for SUBTT20120: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $417.01 Condominium Unit 0.80 $417.01 Multi-Family Unit 0.70 $417.01 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 3.25 $417.01 Vacant Acre 0.25 $417.01 School Acre 0.25 $417.01 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: _671 (Units) x 0.70 EBU Factor x $417.01 Rate per EBU=$_195,869.60_ Annual Assessment *Commencing with fiscal year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index area. Page 87 of 273 ATTACHMENT 3 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 1 of 5 4 2 3 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR SUBTT20120 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 88 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 2 of 5 4 2 3 0 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6 day of December 2023. Page 89 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 3 of 5 4 2 3 0 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 The legal description of the Property is: Being a Subdivision of Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 15424, per Plat Recorded in Book 191, Pages 46 through 48, Inclusive of Parcel Maps, and Parcel A and Parcel B of Instrument No. 2018-0288572 of Official Records, Recorded August 8, 2018, all in the County of San Bernardino, Office of the County Recorder of Said County. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1077-422-51 1077-422-55 1077-422-98 1077-422-99 1090-121-38 1090-121-39 Page 90 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 4 of 5 4 2 3 0 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2023/24 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20120: Eleven (11) LED Street Lights. Page 91 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 5 of 5 4 2 3 0 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2023/24 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2023/24. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for SUBTT20120: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: _671_ (Units) x __1__ EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $_11,923.67_Annual Assessment Page 92 of 273 ATTACHMENT 4 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR SUBTT20120 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 93 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2023. Page 94 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 3 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 The legal description of the Property is: Being a Subdivision of Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 15424, per Plat Recorded in Book 191, Pages 46 through 48, Inclusive of Parcel Maps, and Parcel A and Parcel B of Instrument No. 2018-0288572 of Official Records, Recorded August 8, 2018, all in the County of San Bernardino, Office of the County Recorder of Said County. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1077-422-51 1077-422-55 1077-422-98 1077-422-99 1090-121-38 1090-121-39 Page 95 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 4 of 5 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2023/24 Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20120: None. Page 96 of 273 Resolution No. 2023-XXX – Page 5 of 5 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2023/24 Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $28.96 for the fiscal year 2023/24. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) for SUBTT20120: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $28.96 Multi-Family Residential Unit 0.50 28.96 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 28.96 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: __671_ (Units) x _0.50_ EBU Factor x $28.96 Rate per EBU = $_9,716.08_ Annual Assessment Page 97 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Elisa C. Cox, Assistant City Manager Mike Smith, Chief of Police Jeffrey Allison, Administrative Lieutenant Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Jason A. Shields, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Amending Parking Citation Penalties and Late Payment Penalties for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-116) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution amending Resolution 17-053 and adopting updated parking citation penalties and late payment penalties for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga reviews its fees on a regular basis to ensure that fees are set commensurate with the cost of providing services. While parking citation bail amounts are not user fees, they are typically reviewed on a similar cycle with the goal of seeking to recover some of the costs associated with the Police Department’s enforcement efforts. ANALYSIS: The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department conducted a thorough review of its current fee schedule and a comparative analysis of the fee schedules for the surrounding Police Departments, including but not limited to Chino, Chino Hills, Montclair, Ontario, San Bernardino, and Upland. The parking bail schedule was last updated in 2017, and since that time, the City's contract for law enforcement services has increased by $14.4 million, or approximately 41%. To determine which of the fees should be considered for an increase, staff compared the City’s current bail schedule to the survey cities and identified those fees where one or more of the survey cities’ fees exceeded the City’s fees. The increase in the City’s law enforcement contract (41%) was then applied to those fees on the City’s current bail schedule to determine a proposed fee based on the growth in the contract. That amount was compared to the highest fees charged by the survey cities. Proposing a fee increase equal to the lesser of the two amounts was determined to be the most balanced approach. Based on a review of the survey data and increasing law enforcement costs, an update to the parking citation bail schedule is recommended at this time. The proposed increases keep citation amounts reasonable in relation to other cities in the county, while seeking to better recover costs incurred by enforcement activities. Page 98 of 273 Page 2 2 1 2 7 In addition to the proposed increases discussed above, one of the line items on the current bail schedule (C.V.C. 5204(a) – Current Tags Not Displayed) is being replaced with a new line item (C.V.C. 4000(a)(1) – Registration Fees Due). This is due to a change in State law (an amendment to C.V.C. 5204(a)) which went into effect on January 1, 2023. The amendment essentially states that a vehicle can only be issued a citation under that section if it is not currently registered. As such, the citation is for vehicle registration fees that are due rather than for current tags that are not displayed. Fewer citations are anticipated to be issued under the new line item which will result in reduced revenues in this area of the bail schedule. However, the adjustments to other bail amounts will offset this anticipated reduction. FISCAL IMPACT: The net impact of the proposed adjustments is estimated to be an increase in annual revenues in the amount of $18,000. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s Core Values of intentionally embracing and anticipating our future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2023-116 Page 99 of 273 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PARKING CITATION PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE SECTION 40203.5. A. Recitals. 1.California Vehicle Code Section 40203.5 authorizes the City to establish parking penalties for parking violations and late payment penalties. 2.On December 6, 2023, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an administrative hearing on the proposed adjustments to parking citation penalties and late payment penalties. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby amends the schedule of parking penalties, late payment penalties, and other charges required by law as set forth below: Section Description Current Bail New Bail R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(A)Parking on Divisional Island $70.00 $70.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(D)Prohibited Parking - Red Curb/Sign $70.00 $99.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(E)No Parking in Parkway $58.00 $58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(H)Within 20' of Traffic Control Device $70.00 $70.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Obstructing an Alley $58.00 $58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.050(B)Repair/Wash Vehicle on Street $41.00 $58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.110 Vending from a Vehicle $58.00 $58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.130 72 Hour Parking $175.00 $175.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(B)Yellow Curb Parking $192.00 $192.00 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 100 of 273 Section Description Current Bail New Bail R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(C)White Curb Parking $90.00 $90.00 R.C.M.C. 10.50.130 Permit Parking $75.00 $75.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(A)Res. Over-weight, Exceed 5 Tons $250.00 $329.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(C)Over-weight, Exceed 3 Tons or 80 In. $250.00 $250.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.060(A)Parking Unattached Trailer on Street $70.00 $99.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.070(A)Parking on Private Property $120.00 $120.00 R.C.M.C. 10.54.020(A/B) Parking Electric Vehicle Not Plugged in or Excess 4 Hours $100.00 $100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.64.030 Parking RV on Street 2 A.M. - 6 A.M. $84.00 $84.00 R.C.M.C. 12.04.010(F)Parking in the Park 10 P.M. - 6 A.M. $110.00 $110.00 C.V.C. 4000(a)(1)Registration Fees Due $0.00 $150.00 C.V.C. 5200(A)No Front Plate $156.00 $156.00 C.V.C. 5204(A)Current Tags Not Displayed $97.00 $0.00 C.V.C. 21113(A)Unauthorized School Parking $95.00 $95.00 C.V.C. 22500.1 Fire Lane $94.00 $108.00 C.V.C. 22500(B)Parking Blocking Crosswalk $132.00 $132.00 C.V.C. 22500(D)Parking within 15' Fire Station Driveway $132.00 $132.00 C.V.C. 22500(E)Blocking a Driveway $70.00 $70.00 C.V.C. 22500(F)Blocking a Sidewalk $192.00 $192.00 C.V.C. 22502(A)Unlawful Curb Parking $72.00 $72.00 C.V.C. 22507(A/B)Handicap Stall / Blocking $394.00 $485.00 C.V.C. 22515(H)Parking Setting Brake / Stopping Engine $58.00 $58.00 C.V.C. 22516 Parking with Person Locked Inside Unable to Escape $350.00 $350.00 C.V.C. 22522 Parking within 3' of Sidewalk Ramp $260.00 $260.00 Late Fee - 30 Days from Date of Issue $42.00 $59.00 Page 101 of 273 SECTION 3: The fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect January 2, 2024. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby replaces and supersedes all prior schedules relating to parking penalties and late payment penalties and rescinds Resolution 17-053. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 102 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Deputy Director of Planning SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1022, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Title 17 of The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Establishing Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail as a Use Permitted With a Minor Use Permit for Properties Located in Portions of the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zones, Amending Chapter 8.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Exempting Certain Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail from the Prohibition on Commercial Cannabis Activity; Adding Chapter 5.20 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Establishing Regulatory and Operational Restrictions for Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retailers. This Item is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(C)(2) and 15061(B)(3). (ORDINANCE NO. 1022) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City Council conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 1022 to be read by title only and waive further reading, to amend Title 17 and Chapter 8.52 and add Chapter 5.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to allow and establish regulatory and operational restrictions for Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail, as required by state law. BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2015, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 243, Assembly Bill 266, and Senate Bill 643 into law, which collectively were known as the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (hereinafter “MCRSA”). The MCRSA established a State regulatory and licensing scheme for commercial medical cannabis businesses. On November 8, 2016, California voters approved the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (“AUMA”). The AUMA made it lawful under State and local law for persons 21 years of age or older to possess and cultivate limited quantities of cannabis for personal use. The AUMA also established a State regulatory and licensing scheme for commercial adult-use cannabis businesses. Page 103 of 273 Page 2 2 1 3 0 On June 27, 2017, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 94, which repealed the MCRSA, included certain provisions of the MCRSA in the licensing provisions of the AUMA, and created a single regulatory scheme for both medicinal and adult-use cannabis known as the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA”). The MAUCRSA retains the provisions in the MCRSA and the AUMA that granted local jurisdictions control over whether cannabis businesses could operate in a particular jurisdiction. Specifically, California Business and Professions Code Section 26200 provides that the MAUCRSA shall not be interpreted to supersede or limit authority of a local jurisdiction to adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate businesses licensed under the MAUCRSA including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, or to completely prohibit the establishment or operation of one or more businesses licensed by the State, within that local jurisdiction. In 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance number 921, prohibiting all commercial cannabis activity, both medical and non-medical, prohibiting outdoor cultivation and permitting indoor cannabis cultivation consistent with State law. The table below outlines the current regulations: Table 1 - Current Cannabis Regulations Type of Use Current Regulation Medical Marijuana Dispensary Prohibited Commercial Marijuana Dispensary Prohibited Marijuana Transportation/Delivery Prohibited Marijuana Storage Prohibited Marijuana Laboratory Testing Prohibited Marijuana Cultivation – Personal (Outdoor)Prohibited Marijuana Cultivation – Personal (Indoor)Allowed in residential zones as required by law. Limited to 6 plants per residence. No use permit is required. Must acquire all necessary building permits for associated improvements (i.e. plumbing, electrical, etc.) Must not create any light, glare, odor, noise or vibration that interferes with the reasonable enjoyment of life or property. Marijuana Cultivation – Commercial (Outdoor) Prohibited Marijuana Cultivation – Commercial (Indoor) Prohibited On September 18, 2022, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 1186 (“SB 1186”), which enacted Medicinal Cannabis Patients’ Right of Access Act. SB 1186 provides that a city cannot adopt or enforce regulations that prohibit the “retail sale by delivery” of medicinal cannabis. This includes any regulation that has the effect of prohibiting patients within the city or their caregivers from purchasing, by delivery, sufficient medicinal cannabis to meet their demands in a timely and readily accessible manner. Examples of prohibited regulations include prohibiting retail sale by delivery of medicinal cannabis within the jurisdiction being conducted by a licensed non-storefront retailer. Page 104 of 273 Page 3 2 1 3 0 The proposed amendment establishes reasonable zoning and land use regulations regarding the operation of non-storefront medical cannabis retailers that are intended to address the potential negative impacts of cannabis businesses on the community. Exhibit A, provided by the California Bureau of Cannabis Control, provides more details on how the state regulated non-storefront retailers. ANALYSIS: To comply with SB 1186, staff worked with the City Attorney’s office to develop the proposed changes to the municipal code. These changes are summarized below. Redefining Commercial Cannabis Activity The definition of Commercial Cannabis Activity, which covers all non-personal cannabis activity, will be amended to allow for the possession, storing, delivery or sale of medical cannabis by a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer. This definition will be amended in both Title 8, Chapter 8.52 (Cannabis Prohibitions and Regulations) and Title 17, Chapters 17.32 (Allowed Land Use Definitions) and 17.148 (Cannabis Definitions). Zoning and Development Regulations for Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail SB 1186 requires the City allow for one non-storefront medical cannabis retail establishment. To limits impacts related to the storage and distribution of medicinal cannabis, staff determined the Neo Industrial and Industrial Employment districts were most appropriate zones for this use. Chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Use by Base Zone) now includes non-storefront medical cannabis retail as an allowed use with a Minor Use Permit and Chapter 17.102 (Non-storefront Medical Cannabis Retail) has been added to establish special use regulations for non-storefront medical cannabis retail, including the following: •Limit to one establishment within the city. •Allowed in NI and IE zones, east of Haven Avenue with a Minor Use Permit. •600-foot separation required from a school or daycare facility (public or private) or any other sensitive use listed in Business and Professions Code § 26054(b). This is the maximum separation allowed by state law. •1,000-foot separation required from any existing residential dwelling, church or similar place of worship, park or playground, recreational facility, hospital, public buildings (e.g., city hall, county offices, courthouse, libraries, etc.). •1,000-foot separation from the right-of-way on Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, Foothill Boulevard, and Interstate 15. Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail Permit In addition to a Minor Use Permit, to provide for the orderly regulation of non-storefront medical cannabis retail establishments in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare, chapter 5.20 (Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail) will be added to Title 5 (Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations) to establish a lottery and permitting process for the one establishment allowed until Chapter 17.102. This chapter requires the City staff shall establish and conduct a lottery for determining which non-storefront medical cannabis retailer will (1) be issued a permit and (2) be eligible to apply for a minor use permit. It further defines application requirements to apply for a permit, reiterations operational requirements and requires the licensee to submit to inspections of the establishment as needed by the city. This administrative permit must be renewed annually. Page 105 of 273 Page 4 2 1 3 0 Planning Commission Review On November 8, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted an advertised public hearing to provide the City Council with a recommendation on the proposed ordinance. There was no public comment on the item. The commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and expressed support for limiting the number of businesses to one, limiting the use to industrial zones on the east side of Haven and creating buffers from major roads to prevent misunderstandings for the public that the business will accept customers on site. The commission suggested that staff add a condition of approval to the permit that requires signage on the business that states that customers are not permitted on site. The Planning Commission unanimously adopted (5-0) Planning Commission Resolution 23-29, recommending Council adopt the proposed ordinance. Public Notice This item was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on November 22, 2023. Environmental Assessment The proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The businesses authorized under these proposed Municipal Code text amendments are similar to already existing permitted general uses such as retail, with the only difference being the product sold or consumed (i.e., cannabis). This Ordinance does not change the zoning for any properties, meaning that they do not create negative environmental impacts or result in physical changes to the environment. Non-storefront medical cannabis retailers developed pursuant to this ordinance would be independently reviewed and evaluated pursuant to CEQA. Next Steps Upon adoption of the ordinance, staff and the City Attorney’s office will begin establishing a framework for a lottery system, develop application materials for the new Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail Permit, and establish any new fees associated with the implementation of this program. Fees will be considered by the City Council at a future meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed amendment will create additional short-term costs to develop and administer the lottery and permitting programs, however, fees can be imposed to recover costs to review permit applications. Some sales tax revenue is expected to be generated from the one licensed facility allowed in the city. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: These amendments support the council’s goal of promoting a safe and healthy community for all by imposing appropriate land use controls and operational standards to limit community impacts on a state mandated medical cannabis use. Page 106 of 273 Page 5 2 1 3 0 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Bureau of Cannabis Control Non-Storefront Retailer Fact Sheet Attachment 2 – Signed Planning Commission Resolution 23-29 Attachment 3 – Ordinance No. 1022 Page 107 of 273 RETAILER (NON-STOREFRONT): Sells cannabis goods to customers exclusively through delivery. A retailer non-storefront must have a licensed premises to store the cannabis goods for delivery. The premises of a non-storefront retailer shall not be open to the public. RETAILER (NON-STOREFRONT) REQUIREMENTS • Hours of operation - A licensed retailer may only engage in sales and deliveries between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Pacific Time. • Cannabis goods for sale - A licensed retailer may only sell cannabis goods, cannabis accessories, and licensees’ branded merchandise or promotional materials. - A licensed retailer may only receive cannabis goods for sale from a licensed distributor. - All cannabis goods must comply with all packaging and labeling requirements. - A licensed retailer may not sell cannabis goods that are expired. • Delivery - All delivery customers must provide a valid proof of identification. º Persons 21 years of age or older may purchase adult-use cannabis goods. º Persons 18 years of age or older may purchase medicinal cannabis goods with a valid physician’s recommendation. º Delivery employees must verify the age by inspecting a valid form of identification of all delivery customers, in person, before they complete delivery of the cannabis goods. CANNABIS RETAILER (NON-STOREFRONT) FACT SHEET - Delivery must be made to a physical address in any jurisdiction within California that is not on publicly owned land, a school, a day care, or a youth center. - During delivery, the employee must carry a copy of the retailer’s license, the employee’s government-issued identification, and an identification badge provided by the licensed retailer. - The delivery employee shall not carry cannabis goods valued in excess of $5,000 at any time, with no more than $3,000 of cannabis goods that are not already part of a customer order that was processed prior to leaving the premises. - A delivery request receipt must be prepared for each delivery of cannabis goods and contain all the items listed in section 5420 of the Bureau’s regulations. - Delivery must be made in person by a direct employee of the licensed retailer. An independent contractor, third-party courier service, or an individual employed through a staffing agency would not be considered directly employed by the licensed retailer. - Delivery must be made using an enclosed motor vehicle equipped with a GPS device and secure storage for cannabis goods. - A vehicle used by a licensed retailer for delivery purposes is not required to be owned by the licensee. • Customer returns - A licensed retailer may accept customer returns but may not resell the returned cannabis goods. The returned cannabis goods may be destroyed or, if defective, returned to the distributor from which they were obtained. (continued on next page)Page 108 of 273 REVISED: 02/19 Bureau of Cannabis Control 2920 Kilgore Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 E bcc@dca.ca.gov | P (833) 768-5880 For the latest updates, follow the Bureau on social media WWW.BCC.CA.GOV PDE_19-079 • Cannabis goods packaging, labeling, and exit packaging - A licensed retailer may not accept, possess, or sell cannabis goods that are not packaged for final sale. A retailer may not package or label cannabis goods. - All cannabis goods sold must be in an opaque exit package before delivery to the customer. - Through December 31, 2019, all cannabis goods must either be in a child-resistant package or in a child-resistant exit package. All cannabis goods packaging shall be tamper-evident; and resealable if it contains more than one serving. - Beginning January 1, 2020, a package containing cannabis goods shall be resealable, tamper-evident, and child resistant. - Immature cannabis plants and seeds sold by a licensed retailer are not required to be placed in resealable, tamper-evident, child-resistant packaging. • Shipments and inventory - Licensed retailers can only receive shipments from licensed distributors between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Pacific Time. - Licensed retailers must be able to account for all inventory of cannabis goods and provide the Bureau with inventory records upon request. CANNABIS RETAILER (NON-STOREFRONT) FACT SHEET (continued) • Retailer to retailer transfer - Cannabis goods may be transported by a licensed distributor from one retail location to another retail location if the retail licenses for both locations are held by the same licensee. • Records - A licensed retailer must maintain financial records, personnel records, training records, contracts, permits, security records, destruction records, data entered into track-and-trace, and an accurate record of all sales for seven years. All records must be made available to the Bureau upon request. Page 109 of 273 Page 110 of 273 Page 111 of 273 Page 112 of 273 Page 113 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 1 of 16 ORDINANCE NO. 1022 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING NON- STOREFRONT MEDICAL CANNABIS RETAIL AS A USE PERMITTED WITH A MINOR USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NEO-INDUSTRIAL (NI) AND INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (IE) ZONES, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.52 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE EXCEPTING CERTAIN NON-STOREFRONT MEDICAL CANNABIS RETAIL FROM THE PROHIBITION ON COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY, ADDING CHAPTER 5.20 TO TITLE 5 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATORY AND OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SUCH A NON-STOREFRONT MEDICAL CANNABIS RETAILER, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT I. Recitals. A. Chapters 8.52 and 17.94 and Table 17.30.030-1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) Municipal Code (“RCMC”) currently prohibit all commercial cannabis activity in the City, with limited exceptions to allow cannabis activity that the City is required to permit under state law. B. On October 9, 2015, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 243, Assembly Bill 266, and Senate Bill 643 into law, which collectively were known as the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (hereinafter “MCRSA”). The MCRSA established a State regulatory and licensing scheme for commercial medical cannabis businesses. C. On November 8, 2016, California voters approved the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (“AUMA”). The AUMA made it lawful under State and local law for persons 21 years of age or older to possess and cultivate limited quantities of cannabis for personal use. The AUMA also established a State regulatory and licensing scheme for commercial adult-use cannabis businesses. D. On June 27, 2017, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 94, which repealed the MCRSA, included certain provisions of the MCRSA in the licensing provisions of the AUMA, and created a single regulatory scheme for both medicinal and adult-use cannabis known as the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA”). The MAUCRSA retains the provisions in the MCRSA and the AUMA that granted local jurisdictions control over whether cannabis businesses could operate in a particular jurisdiction. Specifically, California Business and Professions Code Section 26200 provides that the MAUCRSA shall not be interpreted to supersede or limit authority of a local jurisdiction to adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate businesses licensed under the MAUCRSA including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related Page 114 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 2 of 16 to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, or to completely prohibit the establishment or operation of one or more businesses licensed by the State, within that local jurisdiction. E. On September 18, 2022, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 1186 (“SB 1186”), which enacted Medicinal Cannabis Patients’ Right of Access Act. SB 1186 provides that a city cannot adopt or enforce regulations that prohibit the “retail sale by delivery” of medicinal cannabis. This includes any regulation that has the effect of prohibiting patients within the city or their caregivers from purchasing, by delivery, sufficient medicinal cannabis to meet their demands in a timely and readily accessible manner. Examples of prohibited regulations include prohibiting retail sale by delivery of medicinal cannabis within the jurisdiction being conducted by a licensed non-storefront retailer. F. The City Council desires to establish reasonable zoning and land use regulations regarding the operation of non-storefront medical cannabis retailers that are intended to address the potential negative impacts of cannabis businesses on the community. II. Findings. The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The businesses authorized under these proposed Development Code and Municipal Code text amendments are similar to already existing permitted general uses such as retail, with the only difference being the product sold or consumed (i.e., cannabis). This Ordinance does not change the zoning for any properties, meaning that they do not create negative environmental impacts or result in physical changes to the environment. Non-storefront medical cannabis retailers developed pursuant to this Ordinance would be independently reviewed and evaluated pursuant to CEQA. City staff shall cause a Notice of Exemption to be filed as authorized by CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. III. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals and findings are all true and correct and incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference. SECTION 2. Chapter 5.20 (Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail) is hereby added to Title 5 (Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations) to read as set forth below: “Chapter 5.20 NON-STOREFRONT MEDICAL CANNABIS RETAIL 5.20.010 Purpose. This chapter is intended to provide for the orderly regulation of non-storefront medical cannabis retail establishments in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare. Page 115 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 3 of 16 5.20.020 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases are defined and shall be construed as set out in this section, unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning was intended: Non-storefront medical cannabis retail means a retailer that sells medicinal cannabis or medicinal cannabis products, as those terms are defined in Business and Professions Code § 26001(ak)(1), as may be amended, to customers exclusively through delivery. A non-storefront medical cannabis retail has a permitted premises to store medicinal cannabis or medicinal cannabis for delivery, but the premises is not open to the public. A non-storefront medical cannabis retailer shall have a State License Type M-Type 9, Non- Storefront Retailer, limited to delivery services of medical cannabis or cannabis products only. 5.20.030 Permit required. It is unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to engage in, conduct or carry on, or to permit to be engaged in, conducted, or carried on, in or upon any premises within the city, the operation of a non-storefront medical cannabis retail establishment without first having obtained a non-storefront medical cannabis retail regulatory permit, issued by the city pursuant to the provisions herein set forth. Said permit shall immediately be surrendered to the planning director upon suspension, revocation, or expiration of said permit. To engage in non-storefront medical cannabis retail activity allowed by this chapter, a person must also obtain all of the following: A. A minor use permit issued pursuant to section 17.16.120. Any permit that is issued under this chapter shall be void if a minor use permit is not issued by the director pursuant to section 17.16.120 of this code, within a year of issuance of the permit. A minor use permit granted pursuant to this chapter and section 17.16.120 shall not be transferable to another person or entity, and any attempted transfer shall be void. B. A business registration certificate issued pursuant to chapter 5.04; and C. A State license. 5.20.040 Permit application. A. To protect public health and safety, and to further ensure that non-storefront medical cannabis retail activity permitted by this chapter is in the public interest, the city hereby establishes procedures for determining the qualifications of persons allowed to obtain a permit. B. An owner of a non-storefront medical cannabis retail business may apply for a permit, on behalf of a non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, by filing an application with the city manager or their designee. A non-storefront medical cannabis retail business may only submit one (1) application. If a non-storefront medical cannabis retail business has multiple owners, only one (1) owner may submit an application on behalf of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, but all owners must be identified in the application. Page 116 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 4 of 16 C. No person shall knowingly make a false statement of fact or knowingly omit any information that is required in the permit application. D. Applications shall not be accepted or processed unless the applicant pays the nonrefundable application fee in the amount to be established by resolution of the city council. E. The application shall be on a form approved by the city manager and shall include, without limitation, the following: 1. A description of the statutory entity or business form that will serve as the legal structure for the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business; a copy of its formation and organizing documents, including, but not limited to, articles of incorporation, certificate of amendment, statement of information, articles of association, bylaws, partnership agreement, operating agreement, and fictitious business name statement; and the name and address of its agent for purposes of service of process; 2. A list of every fictitious business name the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business is operating under; 3. The legal name of the applicant; 4. If applicable, the business trade name (“DBA”) of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business; 5. A list of the state licenses issued by any California licensing authority to the applicant, or any other owner of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, including the date the license was issued, the date the license will terminate and the licensing authority that issued the license; 6. Whether the applicant, or any owners of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, have been denied a state license or have had a state license suspended or revoked by any licensing authority. The applicant shall identify the type of state license applied for, the name of the licensing authority that denied the application, and the date of denial; 7. The non-storefront medical cannabis retail business’ employer identification number; 8. The physical address of any other premises owned or operated by the applicant involved in commercial cannabis activity operations, or any other owner of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, and a brief summary of the business operations at each premises; 9. A complete list of every owner of, or person with a financial interest in, the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business. Each individual named on this list shall submit the following information: a. Their full name; Page 117 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 5 of 16 b. Their title within the applicant entity, if applicable; c. Their date of birth and place of birth; d. Their social security number or individual taxpayer identification number; e. Their mailing address; f. Their home, business, or mobile telephone number and email address; g. Their current employer; h. Their percentage of ownership interest held in the applicant entity, or other financial interest held in the applicant entity; i. Whether the individual has an ownership or a financial interest in any other non-storefront medical cannabis retail business licensed by a state licensing authority; j. A copy of the individual’s government-issued identification that includes the name, date of birth, physical description and picture of the owner or person with a financial interest in the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business; k. If applicable, a copy of any certificate of rehabilitation issued under Penal Code § 4852.01 or dismissal issued pursuant to Penal Code § 1203.4 or 1203.41; l. If applicable, a detailed description of any suspension or revocation of a cannabis related license or sanctions for unlicensed or unlawful cannabis activity by a state or local governmental agency against the applicant, or any of its owners or persons with a financial interest in the cannabis business; and m. Pursuant to California Penal Code §§ 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11), which authorize city authorities to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment, licensing, or certification purposes, and authorize access to federal level criminal history information by transmitting fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice to be transmitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, every owner or person with a financial interest in the cannabis business must submit fingerprints and other information deemed necessary by the police chief, or his or her designee(s), for a background check by the police department. A fee for the cost of the background investigation, which shall be the actual cost to the city to conduct the background investigation as it deems necessary and appropriate, including city staff time and costs, shall be paid at the time the person submits for the background check. Page 118 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 6 of 16 10. The proposed hours of operation; 11. Authorization and consent for city staff and the police chief to seek verification of the information contained within the application; 12. A safety and security plan; 13. Attestation to the following statement: Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare that the information contained within and submitted with the application is complete, true, and accurate. I understand that a misrepresentation of fact, whether intentional or not, is cause for rejection of this application, denial of the permit, or revocation of a permit issued; 14. Evidence that the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business will be compliant with the location restrictions set forth in Business and Professions Code § 26054(b) and the zoning restrictions set forth in section 17.102.080 of this code; 15. If the applicant is the landowner upon which the premises is located, a copy of the title or deed to the property; 16. If the applicant is leasing the premises where the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business will be conducted, a written, notarized statement from the owner of the property where the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business will operate evidencing unqualified consent to the applicant operating a non- storefront medical cannabis retail business on the property. The statement must specify the street address (unless the property is a vacant lot to be developed) and assessor’s parcel number for the premises. The statement shall also contain the name, business address, email address and telephone number of the property owner(s) (whether business entity or individual); 17. A premises diagram; and 18. Proof of a state license. G. Nothing in this section is intended to limit the city manager’s ability to request additional information the city manager deems necessary or relevant to determining a non- storefront medical cannabis retail business’ suitability for a permit. An applicant shall provide any additional information requested by the city manager no later than seven (7) days after the request, unless otherwise specified by the city manager. H. The city manager is hereby authorized to waive any application requirement, as long as the waiver is uniformly applied to all applicants. 5.20.050 Permit expiration and renewal. A permit that is issued pursuant to this chapter is valid for a term of one (1) year from the date of issuance. Renewal terms shall not exceed one (1) year. A permit shall expire one (1) year following its issuance. All non-storefront medical cannabis activity shall cease upon expiration of the permit unless and until the permit is renewed or a new permit is issued. Issuance of a non-storefront medical cannabis retail regulatory permit does not create a land use entitlement. Page 119 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 7 of 16 5.20.060 Operational and maintenance standards. A. Non-storefront, delivery-only medical cannabis retail operations must obtain and maintain a valid minor use permit pursuant to the provisions in section 17.16.120 and comply with all conditions of approval at all times. B. Medical Cannabis, Delivery Only. Non-storefront, delivery-only medical cannabis retail operations licensed pursuant to this chapter may engage only in the sale and delivery of medical cannabis and medical cannabis products to customers and qualified patients and their caregivers. C. Fees. All non-storefront, delivery-only medical cannabis retail operations must pay all applicable fees as established by resolution of the city council in order to commence and continue operations. 5.20.070 Inspection. The city, including the police department shall, from time to time and during any hour in which a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer is open for business, make an administrative inspection of each non-storefront medical cannabis retailer for the purpose of determining compliance with this chapter. 5.20.080 Additional regulations. In addition to any regulations adopted by the city council, the city manager is authorized to establish any additional rules, regulations, and standards governing the issuance, denial, or renewal of non-storefront medical cannabis retail permits, the ongoing operation of non-storefront medical cannabis retail businesses and the city’s oversight, or concerning any other subject determined to be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter. Regulations promulgated by the city manager shall become effective upon date of publication. 5.20.090 Retailer lottery. A. As set forth in section 17.102.080, there is a limit on the number of non-storefront medical cannabis retailers that can operate in the city. At no point shall the number of non-storefront medical cannabis retailers in the city exceed the number of retailers allowed under section 17.102.080. B. City staff shall establish and conduct a lottery for determining which non-storefront medical cannabis retailer will (1) be issued a permit and (2) be eligible to apply for a minor use permit pursuant to the provisions of sections 17.16.120 and 17.102.080 of this code. C. The city manager is authorized to establish the procedures that will be followed in conducting the lottery, and the steps to be included in a schedule that will be prepared for the receipt and review of permit applications for retailers. The city manager is further authorized to make any necessary changes to the lottery procedures and steps to be included in the schedule as they deem appropriate for its implementation. 5.20.100 Decision on lottery and permit. Page 120 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 8 of 16 A. The city manager, in consultation with the police chief, shall evaluate all completed non-storefront medical cannabis retailer applications that are submitted by the application deadline and determine whether the applicant can participate in the lottery. The applicant shall be ineligible to participate in the lottery if the city manager determines that one (1) or more of the following conditions exist: 1. The applicant has not paid all fees required for consideration of the application; 2. The application is incomplete, filed late, or is otherwise not responsive to the requirements of this chapter; 3. The application contains a false or misleading statement or omission of a material fact; 4. The applicant, or any owner or person with a financial interest in the non- storefront medical cannabis retail business, is not at least twenty-one (21) years old; 5. The applicant, or any owner or person with a financial interest in the non- storefront medical cannabis retail business, has been denied a license or other authorization to engage in commercial cannabis activity by a state licensing or permitting authority, for any reason other than the fact that the applicant was not selected for a limited number of licenses or permits, but would have otherwise qualified to obtain the license or permit; 6. The applicant, or any owner or person with a financial interest in the non- storefront medical cannabis retail business, is employed by the police department or the city’s community development department; 7. The applicant, or any owners or persons with a financial interest in the non- storefront medical cannabis retailer, has been convicted of: a. A serious or violent felony conviction, as specified in Penal Code § 667.5(c) or § 1192.7(c); b. A felony conviction involving fraud, deceit, or embezzlement; c. A felony conviction for hiring, employing, or using a minor in transporting, carrying, selling, giving away, preparing for sale, or peddling, any controlled substance to a minor; or selling, offering to sell, furnishing, offering to furnish, administering, or giving any controlled substance to a minor; 8. A felony conviction for drug trafficking with enhancements pursuant to Health and Safety Code §§ 11370.4 or 11379.8; 9. The applicant, or any owners or persons with a financial interest in the non- storefront medical cannabis retailer, has had a judgment entered against them for unpermitted commercial cannabis activity in violation of any city zoning ordinance enacted under zoning law; Page 121 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 9 of 16 10. The operation of the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer, as described in its application, would fail to comply with any provision of this code, or any state law or regulation; and/or 11. Operation of the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer in the manner proposed poses a threat to the public health, safety or welfare, or violates any provision of this chapter. B. If none of the above-referenced conditions exist, the city manager, or their designee, shall notify the applicant that the applicant is eligible to participate in the lottery. If any of the above-referenced conditions exist, the city manager shall notify the applicant that the applicant has been denied the opportunity to participate in the lottery. Any notice of denial shall set forth the reasons of denial and advise the applicant of the right to contest the denial pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 5.20.110. C. If a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer is selected in the lottery to obtain a permit, the retailer shall have 90 days from the date of the notice to the retailer that they are eligible to obtain a permit to provide documentation to the city manager showing the following: 1. If the applicant is leasing the premises where the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business will be conducted, a copy of the rental or lease agreement shall be provided; 2. A copy of the applicant’s application with the State Department of Cannabis Control to operate a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer in the city; 3. Evidence that the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer will be compliant with the location restrictions set forth in Business and Professions Code § 26054(b) and the zoning restrictions set forth in section 17.102.080 of this code. Any evidence that was submitted at the time of the application shall be updated to ensure that the retailer is still compliant with this provision; and 4. Background check results for all employees, managers, and agents of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business. Any employee, manager, or agent of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business that has been convicted of a disqualifying crime, shall not be permitted to work for the non- storefront medical cannabis retail business, without first obtaining a waiver from the city manager, after consultation with the police chief. D. If the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer fails to provide the information set forth in subsection (C) above within the 90 day period, or does not meet the location or zoning restrictions set forth in section 17.102.080, the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer shall not be issued a permit. G. The facility approved by the initial permit shall be open for business within six months from the date when both the minor use permit, if applicable, and the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer regulatory permit have been approved unless a different opening date is described in the conditions of approval for the permit or the city manager, for good cause, grants in writing an extension of the opening date prior to opening date. Page 122 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 10 of 16 5.20.110 Appeals. A. Lottery appeals. If a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer applicant is denied the opportunity to participate in the lottery due to the applicant’s failure to submit a complete application by the required deadline, failure to satisfy the criteria for issuance of a permit, or for any other reason, the applicant may appeal this decision in writing. The written appeal shall be filed with the city clerk within ten days of the issuance and mailing of the written decision by the city manager on the application accompanied by the appeal fee as adopted by resolution of the city council. The appeal shall be conducted in accordance with subsection C. After the deadline to appeal has passed, the decision to deny the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer the opportunity to participate in the lottery shall be deemed final, and may no longer be appealed. In the event an appeal of the city manager’s decision to allow a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer applicant to participate in a lottery is timely filed, the lottery shall not be conducted until the appeal is heard and decided. B. Appeals related to issuance of non-storefront medical cannabis retailer regulatory permit. An applicant that seeks to operate a non-storefront medical cannabis retail business in the city, may appeal the city manager’s decision not to issue the cannabis business a permit in writing pursuant to the provisions of subsection C. The written appeal shall be filed with the city clerk within 15 days of the issuance and mailing of the written decision by the city manager on the permit accompanied by the appeal fee as adopted by resolution of the city council. After the deadline to appeal has passed, the decision to deny the issuance of a permit shall be deemed final, and may no longer be appealed. A non-storefront medical cannabis retailer may only appeal the city manager’s decision to deny the applicant a permit if the non-storefront medical cannabis retailer participated in the lottery. C. A written request for an appeal under this section shall be filed with the city clerk pursuant to the deadlines noted above and all such requests shall contain the following information: 1. The name and address of the applicant; 2. The date of the decision in question; 3. The reasons for the appeal; and 4. The grounds relied upon for relief. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be mailed to the applicant, by certified mail, no later than ten days prior to the date set for the hearing. The notice may also designate certain records that the applicant is required to produce at the time of the hearing. At the hearing as prescribed by this section, the applicant and the city may submit any and all evidence as they believe to be relevant. The city council may require the presentation of additional evidence from either the applicant or the city, or from both, and may continue the hearing from time to time for the purpose of allowing the presentation of additional evidence. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the city council may, by resolution Page 123 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 11 of 16 with findings, approve, reverse, or modify the decision of the city manager and such decision of the city council shall be final. 5.20.120 Limitation on city’s liability. A. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the city does not assume any liability whatsoever, with respect to approving any permit pursuant to this chapter or the operation of any non-storefront medical cannabis retailer approved under to this chapter. B. As a condition of approval of a permit as provided in this chapter, the applicant or its legal representative shall do the following: 1. Execute an agreement indemnifying the city from any claims, damages, injuries, or liabilities of any kind associated with the operation of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, issuance of a permit to a non-storefront medical cannabis retail business, or the prosecution of the non-storefront medical cannabis retail business or its owners, managers, directors, officers, employees, or its qualified patients or primary caregivers for violation of federal or state laws; 2. Maintain insurance in the amounts and of the types that are acceptable to the city manager or designee; and 3 Reimburse the city for all costs and expenses, including, without limitation, legal fees and costs and court costs, which the city may be required to pay as a result of any legal challenge related to the city’s approval of a minor use permit or non-storefront medical cannabis retail regulatory permit or related to the city’s approval of non-storefront medical cannabis retail activity. The city, at its sole discretion, may participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of any of the obligations imposed hereunder. 5.20.130 Violations. A. It is the duty of the city manager, planning director, police chief, or their designees, to enforce the rules and regulations in accordance with this chapter. B. Pursuant to the city’s prosecutorial discretion, the city may enforce violations of the provisions of this chapter as criminal, civil, and/or administrative actions. C. Any person who violates the provisions of this chapter may be subject to administrative fines in an amount not to exceed $1,000.00, or such other amount as may be permitted under California Government Code § 36901. In addition to the recovery of administrative fines, the city may recover its costs and expenses incurred in enforcing a violation of this chapter. An order to pay administrative fines and costs may be appealed pursuant to section 1.12.210 of this code. E. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a non-storefront medical cannabis retail permit may not be issued, renewed, or amended unless and until due and unpaid citations are paid in full. 5.20.140 Nuisance. Page 124 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 12 of 16 A. Any use or condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall be and is hereby declared a public nuisance. B. The violation of any provision of this chapter shall be and is hereby declared to be contrary to the public interest and shall, at the discretion of the city, create a cause for injunctive relief. C. Any person subject to this chapter who personally, or through an agent, employee, independent contractor, or other representative, violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any such violation is committed, continued, or permitted by such person. All remedies provided herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive.” SECTION 3. The definition of “commercial cannabis activity” in Section 8.52.010 (Definitions) of Chapter 8.52 (Cannabis Prohibitions and Regulations) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) is hereby amended to read as follows: “Commercial cannabis activity means the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code section 11362.765. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the possession, storing, delivery or sale of cannabis by a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer as defined in section 5.20.020 of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 4. Section 8.52.030 (Exceptions) of Chapter 8.52 (Cannabis Prohibitions and Regulations) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) is hereby amended to add a new subsection “D” to read as set forth below with the remainder of the section to remain unchanged: “D. Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the establishment of one physical premises from which retail sale by delivery of medicinal cannabis within the city is conducted by a non-storefront medical cannabis retail use. A non-storefront medical cannabis retail use shall be permitted with a minor use permit subject to the requirements set forth in section 17.102.080 and a non-storefront medical cannabis retail regulatory permit subject to the requirements set forth in chapter 5.20. A non-storefront medical cannabis retailer may deliver medical cannabis within the jurisdictional limits of the city.” SECTION 5. Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zone) of Section 17.30.030 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements) of Chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Use by Base Zone) of Article III (Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Page 125 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 13 of 16 Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) is hereby amended to add “non-storefront medical cannabis retail” as a “Permitted with a Minor Use Permit” use subject to section 17.102.080 in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) zones. The “non-storefront medical cannabis retail” use shall be “Not Permitted” in all other zones. SECTION 6. Subsection (E)(12) of Section 17.32.020 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Article III (Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) is hereby amended to read as follows: “12. Commercial cannabis activity. Any location providing for the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code § 11362.765. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the possession, storing, delivery or sale of cannabis by a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer as defined in section 5.20.020 of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 7. Subsections (E)(22) through (E)(28) of Section 17.32.020 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Article III (Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) are hereby renumbered to (E)(23) through (E)(29), respectively. SECTION 8. A new Subsection (E)(22) is hereby added to Section 17.32.020 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Article III (Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) to read as follows: “22. Non-storefront medical cannabis retail. A retailer as defined in section 5.20.020 of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 9. Section 17.94.040 (Exceptions) of Chapter 17.94 (Commercial Cannabis Uses and Cultivation) of Article V (Specific Use Requirements) of Title 17 (Development Code) is hereby amended to add a new subsection “D” to read as set forth below with the remainder of the section to remain unchanged: “D. Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the establishment of one physical premises from which retail sale by delivery of medicinal cannabis within the city is conducted by a non-storefront medical cannabis retail use. A non-storefront medical cannabis retail use shall be permitted with a minor use permit subject to the requirements set forth in section 17.102.080 and a non-storefront medical cannabis retail regulatory permit subject to the Page 126 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 14 of 16 requirements set forth in chapter 5.20. A non-storefront medical cannabis retailer may deliver medical cannabis within the jurisdictional limits of the city.” SECTION 10. Section 17.102.080 (Non-storefront Medical Cannabis Retail) is hereby added to Chapter 17.102 (Special Regulated Uses) of Article V (Specific Use Regulations) of Title 17 (Development Code) to read as set forth below: “17.102.080 Non-storefront medical cannabis retail. A. Applicability. The development standards of this section shall apply to non- storefront medical cannabis retail facilities. “Non-storefront medical cannabis retail” means a retailer that sells medicinal cannabis or medicinal cannabis products, as those terms are defined in Business and Professions Code § 26001(ak)(1), as may be amended, to customers exclusively through delivery. A non-storefront medical cannabis retail has a permitted premises to store medicinal cannabis or medicinal cannabis for delivery, but the premises is not open to the public. A non-storefront medical cannabis retailer shall have a State License Type M-Type 9, Non-Storefront Retailer, limited to delivery services of medical cannabis or cannabis products only. B. Limit on retailers. No more than one non-storefront medical cannabis retail use shall be allowed in the city. C. Permitted with minor use permit. The non-storefront medical cannabis retail use shall be permitted upon issuance of a minor use permit, subject to section 17.16.120, in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) zones, pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 of section 17.30.030 of this code, except that a non-storefront medical cannabis retail use is not permitted west of Haven Avenue. D. Minimum proximity requirements. Non-storefront medical cannabis retail facilities shall not be located closer than 600 feet from a school or daycare facility (public or private) or any other sensitive use listed in Business and Professions Code § 26054(b), 1,000 feet from any existing residential dwelling, church or similar place of worship, park or playground, recreational facility, hospital, public buildings (e.g., city hall, county offices, courthouse, libraries, etc.), or 1,000 feet from the right-of-way on Haven Avenue, Miliken Avenue, 4th Street, Foothill Boulevard, and the I-15 freeway. E. Measurement of distance. The distance between a non-storefront medical cannabis retail facility and a use listed in subsection D shall be made in a straight line, without regard to the intervening structures or objects, from the closest exterior wall of the structure, or portion of the structure, in which the use is located, to the property line of the parcel on which the structure, or portion of the structure, in which the use occurs or is located. F. Operational restrictions. Non-storefront medical cannabis retailers shall be subject to the requirements of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 11. The definition of “commercial cannabis activity” in Section 17.148.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 17.148 (Cannabis Definitions) of Article IX (Glossary) of Title 17 (Development Code) is hereby amended to read as follows: Page 127 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 15 of 16 “Commercial cannabis activity means the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code § 11362.765. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the possession, storing, delivery or sale of cannabis by a non-storefront medical cannabis retailer as defined in section 5.20.020 of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 12. Section 17.148.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 17.148 (Cannabis Definitions) of Article IX (Glossary) of Title 17 (Development Code) is hereby amended to add the following definition of “non-storefront medical cannabis retail” in alphabetical order: “Non-storefront medical cannabis retail shall have the meaning set forth in section 5.20.020 of chapter 5.20 of this code.” SECTION 13. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the ability of the City to adopt or enforce any regulations on commercial cannabis operations, other than non-storefront, delivery-only medical cannabis retailers in the City as required pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 26322. Except as expressly amended in this Ordinance, the City’s prohibition on commercial cannabis activities and uses in Chapters 8.52 and 17.94 and Table 17.30.030-1 of the RCMC remain in full force and effect. SECTION 14. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 15. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other ordinance of the City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances, which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. Page 128 of 273 Ordinance 1022 Page 16 of 16 SECTION 16. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______________, 2023. _____________________________________ L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _____ day of _______________, 2023, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST:______________________________ City Clerk Page 129 of 273 Cannabis Ordinance City Council December 6, 2023 Background •Cannabis has been legal in California •Proposition 215 (1996) –Legalized Medicinal Cannabis •Proposition 64 (2016) –Legalized Recreational Cannabis •Series of state laws to regulate the sale of cannabis •2015 Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act •2017 Medical land Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act •2016 –Council directed study •Cross functional staff team •Visit to Colorado jurisdictions to understand impacts •Reported back in May 2016 •Council directed staff to draft ordinances prohibiting Cannabis sales and delivery in the city Background Background •SB 1186 •Signed by Governor in 2022 •Cannot prohibit the retail sale by delivery of medical cannabis •Does not apply to recreational cannabis •Non-Storefront Cannabis Retail •Allows a cannabis business •No customers allowed on site •Sales done online •Delivery is made to purchaser Code Changes •Redefine Commercial Cannabis Activity •Amend Code to allow for non-storefront medical cannabis •Establish Zoning Regulations •One non-storefront medical cannabis establishment in City •Allowed in Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment zones •Minor Use Permit Required •Additional regulations •600 foot separation from school, daycare facility or other sensitive use •1,000 foot separation from existing residential dwelling, place of worship, park, playground, recreational facility, hospital or civic building •1,000 foot separation from Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 Code Changes •Establish Non-Storefront Medical Cannabis Retail Permit •Administrative permit in addition to the Minor Use Permit •Establish a lottery to determine which business is selected •Renewed Annually •Next Steps •Establish lottery system •Develop application materials for administrative permit •Establish fees to implement program Planning Commission Recommendation •Considered by Planning Commission on November 8, 2023 •No public comment •Supportive of limiting locations and number of businesses •Unanimously recommended approval to the Council •Planning Commission and Staff recommends Council conduct first reading of Ordinance 1022 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager Zack Neighbors, Director of Building and Safety Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning Justin Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Chandra Thomas, Management Analyst Ill Jason Shields, Management Analyst II Aracely Estrada, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider Establishing, Repealing, and Amending Certain Service and User Fee Adjustments for Various Departments (Building and Safety Services, Planning and Economic Development, and Community Services), Consider Amending the Transportation Development Impact Fees for Engineering Services, and Consider Two Resolutions Approving Such New Service and User Fees. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-121) and (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-122) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: 1.Conduct a public hearing on the proposed new and amended fees; 2.Adopt a Resolution to establish new fees, repeal outdated fees, and amend certain existing fees for Citywide service and user fees; and 3.Adopt a Resolution to amend Transportation Development Impact Fees for the Engineering Services Department. BACKGROUND: The City can impose fees under the authority granted by California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq. Fees are allowed to be imposed to recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. One such example are the fees charged to new development which are a way of recovering costs incurred in processing or mitigating the development, to ensure that existing taxpayers are not subsidizing for-profit enterprises. To impose fees, the City must hold at least one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled meeting to allow for public comment on the proposed fees. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has established fees by authority of the Municipal Code, City Ordinances, City Resolutions, City development/funding agreements, and State and Federal statutes. As a matter of routine, City departments typically revisit fees at least once per year to ensure that small adjustments can be made over time to keep up with operational and construction Page 130 Page 2 2 1 2 8 costs. Additionally, to reduce the number of fees brought before the City Council annually, certain fees are adjusted annually by applying a fee escalator approved by prior resolutions. Further, the City Council has by longstanding practice sought to recover from new development, as close to 100% of actual costs, through fees, as is practical. Most of the City’s Development Impact Fees (DIF) and permit fees were last updated in 2018. Typically, fees would have been reviewed in the years following 2018, but due to COVID, and 2020 and 2021 being such anomalous years resulting in flat or reduced costs, fee updates did not occur. 2022 marked a return to a more typical level of operations, but skyrocketing inflation coupled with rapid cost changes made it impractical to update fees during the year. During the past four months of 2023, inflation has returned to a normal range and prices have begun to stabilize allowing departments to once again review fees and make recommendations for adjustments. To summarize, the current 5-year adjustment accounts for inflation in 2018, 2019, 2022 and 2023 with 2020-21 generally being relatively flat and certainly atypical in terms of inflationary pressures. This report covers requests for revisions to fees for Building and Safety Services, Planning and Economic Development, and Community Services as well as an update to the Transportation DIF. Without updates fees, the City is subsidizing new development using taxpayer dollars because it is not covering actual costs (construction bids, wages and hours of labor) that are incurred in the development process (inspections, permits, reviews and impact mitigation). ANALYSIS: It is necessary for the City to periodically update its user fees to ensure that fees charged are commensurate to the estimated cost of providing individualized services. Fee studies are conducted to justify modifications to fees as needed. For many years the City has (except for Development Impact Fees which represent actual construction costs) used a time (hours of labor) and wages (cost per hour) methodology to ensure it provides accurate cost recovery without exceeding actual costs. The following user fee adjustments are detailed in the first proposed Resolution (Attachment 1): COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The City last conducted a comprehensive fee study for user fees for Building and Safety Services and Planning in 2018. By late 2022, both departments identified the need for an updated comprehensive fee study. The City contracted with NBS, whom it has used before and who has extensive statewide experience in this area, for a comprehensive fee study to review current fees for both Building and Safety and the Planning Departments. The analysis completed by NBS for each department reviewed existing fees to ensure fees do not exceed the costs of services and to provide an opportunity for City Council to realign fee amounts with the City’s cost recovery policies. While the purpose of the study was to determine the full cost to the City of providing the service, the City ultimately decides what level of cost recovery is desired through the fee schedule, up to the full cost. Staff reviewed the results of the study and refined the final proposed fees taking into consideration the degree of overall fee change and, where appropriate, comparisons to local jurisdictions. This review resulted in fee recommendations that in some cases are lower than the full cost recovery estimated by NBS. This is part of the City's effort to support homeowners and the business community by reducing barriers to entry into the local marketplace and ensuring Rancho Cucamonga remains competitive with other local jurisdictions. Page 131 Page 3 2 1 2 8 BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES Since the 2018 comprehensive fee study was conducted, the Building and Safety Services Department evolved their workflows for receiving and processing plans and permits. The Department’s process moved away from traditional paper submittals to become fully digital. Due to this significant shift and the length of time that has passed since the 2018 study was completed, a new fee study was deemed necessary. Staff recommend making the following adjustments, which if approved, will recover approximately 99% of the costs incurred: To create a more equitable approach, Building and Safety staff recommend separating submission types by residential routed (full plan review) and non-routed (plan checked via a Community Development Technician), and a no plan check submission type to align with the varying ways properties are developed and improved. Staff is recommending an increase in some fees and a reduction in others like residential permit fees which include water heaters, tankless water heaters, swimming pools, tile lift and relay roofing, and patio covers. Certain existing fees related to the Building and Safety Services Department have been collapsed, combined, or eliminated to create a new streamlined approach for applying fees to plan check and inspection services. Some of the common permit types obtained by local businesses and homeowners are recommended for fee reductions to relieve some of the cost burden, and to encourage property owners to obtain building permits. For a few permits, staff are recommending a lower fee than what was recommended by NBS including fees for block walls, fences, interior remodels, and cabanas. Staff is also recommending, effective July 1, 2024, the fees be automatically adjusted on an annual basis by the percentage change in the Employment Cost Index (ECI) for state and local government workers, total compensation (not seasonally adjusted), during the 12-month period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year, as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. The ECI escalator is consistent with other departments who apply the ECI to permit fees to ensure recovery of costs for administering the service. These fees are subject to the current 7% Technology Fee and 10% General Plan Fee. Building and Safety Services Number of Increased Fees Number of Decreased Fees Number of New Fees 184 86 21 PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Based on the findings in the NBS fee study analysis, current planning fees are under-recovered. The fee study concluded that the current cost recovery rate from fees related to Planning’s development services is, on average, 69.8% of the total cost of providing services, which is significantly short of the City Council’s long-standing goal of 100% cost recovery. To recover the full cost of services, most fees would have to be increased; however, an increase to all fees to obtain 100% recovery is impractical and not recommended. A deeper review was conducted on each fee to determine what adjustments should be made to better align Planning fees and costs recovered to services provided. Staff recommend making the following adjustments, which if approved, will recover approximately 88% of the costs incurred: Deposit and Flat fee types The majority of fees are categorized as either Deposit-based or Flat (fixed). For Deposit-based fees, the applicant must complete a processing agreement, acknowledging the deposit and their Page 132 Page 4 2 1 2 8 awareness that they will be charged for the actual time and materials required to perform the work/service. Applicants must also agree to provide additional deposits if the cost exceeds the initial deposit collected. Applicants will receive a refund if any amount of the deposit is unused. As part of this study, it was determined that some fees should be recategorized to Flat fees as they were typically found to be more predictable, or were charged at actual cost. This recommendation covers fees like the Landscape Plan Review-New Development Reviewed by City Staff, Technical Report Review-City Administrative Processing Fee, Tribal Consultation, and Zoning Map Amendment. Increases Staff recommends increasing a total of 85 fees, at an average of 24%. Of the 85 increased fees, eight are Deposit-based. Increasing these fees will help the City better align or keep up with the related actual cost of providing the services; however, not all recommended increases will result in a 100% recovery rate. For example, the current Annexation fee is $15,000 (Deposit-based), the full recovery fee is $84,461; however, staff recommends the deposit increase to only $40,000. Therefore, while the Annexation fee reflects the highest recommended increase (166%) over the current fee amount, it does not actually recover the full amount of cost, and because it is Deposit- based, the payee will receive a refund for any unused portion of their deposit. Another fee reflecting a more sizable, recommended increase (119%), is the Public Noticing Staff Time for Small Mailers, which is a flat fee. The increase from $204 (current) to $448 (full recovery) is recommended to offset the time it takes staff to prepare and mail out notices, as well as increased supply and mailing costs. Decreases Staff recommend decreasing six fees including the Certificate of Appropriateness- Residential/Non-profit fee which is currently $2,644. It is recommended that the City fully subsidize this fee to encourage maintenance and avoid demolition due to neglect. Recommendations to decrease other fees are linked to savings realized through the enhancement of processes due to technology updates, such as the Property Ownership List- Standard and Custom application. No changes or subsidized fees No change recommendations are being made for 24 existing fees. Some of these fees include the Density Bonus Agreement, the General Plan Amendment, and the Master Plan Amendment. Of these 24 fees, several will continue to be subsidized, such as the Landmark Application, the Property Ownership List-Small application, the Mills Act Application, the Temporary Use Permit- Residential Haunted Houses, and the Tree Removal Permits-Single Family Residential for Dead Trees. Other fees are being recommended for slight increases but remain mostly subsidized; these include the Temporary Use Permit for Non-Profits and the Temporary Use Permit for All- Others. New fees Recommendations are being made to add four fee categories. These include the Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee for monitoring costs associated with the Density Bonus affordability covenants to ensure private development maintains the affordable units they proposed as part of their project; Public Noticing-Large Mailer, to account for the additional time it takes staff to prepare large mailers; SB 330 Preliminary Application Fee, for costs associated with reviewing SB330 applications; and Tree Removal Permits-Process fee, to recover expenses related to the additional staff time spent reviewing and processing tree removal permits when a tree was removed without an approved permit. Page 133 Page 5 2 1 2 8 Removed Several fees were found to no longer be needed and are recommended for removal, such as, Government Referral, City Facilitation of Consultant, Large Day Care Permit, Pre-Application Review- Planning Commission, and Preliminary Review. Other minor updates are recommended for several fee categories, including name updates and the creation of new sub-categories. For example, Specific/Community was updated to Specific Plan, Design Review was updated to Major Design Review, and the subcategory Facilitation of Consultant was renamed to City Administrative Processing Fee. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan Although a majority of the Planning and Economic Development Fees are recommended for replacement in the attached resolution, the fees established to recover costs associated with the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan remain unchanged, and Resolution #20- 003, which adopted these fees, remains in place. General Plan Maintenance Fee State law requires every city and county adopt and maintain an up-to-date comprehensive General Plan to guide the community’s future growth and development. Without a valid General Plan, the City can be legally restricted from making land use changes and approving new development projects, including functions such as amending the development code, issuing land use and building permits, and taking other actions on planning and building applications. Updating the General Plan and implementing it is an unfunded State mandate. As such, State law recognizes that the City Council may establish fees to support work including, but not limited to, the adoption and administration of the General Plan, but that the “fees shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged” (Government Code Section 66016). In 2018, a 10% General Plan Maintenance Fee was adopted. NBS reviewed the current fee to determine if additional adjustments were needed. Staff has estimated the cost for the most recent General Plan update, including consultant costs and staff time, to be $2.8 million. While the NBS study indicates a full cost recovery would increase the General Plan Maintenance Fee from 10% to 15.9%, staff recommends maintaining a 10% rate at this time. The fee will help defray the costs of updating and implementing the General Plan, updating the General Plan EIR at the 5-year mark to allow development to continue to “tier” off the document to streamline environmental review, as well as preparing implementation programs necessary to make the appropriate findings and determinations required in the development process. The recommended fees for the Building and Safety Services and the Planning and Economic Development were initially compared with fees in nearby cities. However, due to outdated comparisons and differing calculation methods, this approach was largely ineffective and unhelpful. The final fee adjustments are based on detailed fee studies and expert recommendations, involving input from department staff and consultants, ensuring a more relevant and informed decision-making process. Planning and Economic Development Number of Increased Fees Number of Decreased Fees Number of New Fees 85 6 4 Page 134 Page 6 2 1 2 8 CIVIC AND CULTURAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES The Community Services Department is unwavering in its commitment to improving service options to meet the evolving needs of our valued customers. In this endeavor, staff have introduced recommendations for new options for court and field rentals, which provide greater flexibility for our patrons. Additionally, to create a more sustainable service delivery model, the Department recommends increasing the ActiveNet Transaction Fee by 1%, making minor language changes, and removing fees no longer applicable to its business model. Staff have carefully considered these changes to ensure the Department’s fees align with the community’s needs and preferences. Staff is also recommending, effective July 1, 2024, the fees be automatically adjusted on an annual basis by the percentage change in the Employment Cost Index (ECI) for state and local government workers, total compensation (not seasonally adjusted), during the 12-month period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year, as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. The ECI escalator is consistent with other departments that apply the ECI to permit fees to ensure recovery of costs for administering the service. The ECI will not apply to deposit-based fees. The following development impact fee adjustments are detailed in the second proposed Resolution (Attachment 2): ENGINEERING SERVICES Transportation Development Impact Fee (DIF) Update On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development impact fees. The last fee update to the Transportation DIFs occurred in December 2020 through the City Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 2020-122. It is necessary for the City to regularly evaluate the costs of the transportation development impact fee program to ensure the impact fees charged keep pace with the increasing construction costs for these vital projects that help mitigate the citywide traffic impact of new development. The current Transportation DIFs have been reviewed and analyzed by City staff and found insufficient to meet both current and future transportation needs due to significantly increased construction costs since the last fee update in December 2020. Recent (2022 and 2023) actual costs received from competitive bids for things like traffic signals and left turn flashing arrows, for example, bear out that the City is only covering about 60% of the actual cost from fees collected and the difference is being covered from General Fund tax dollars. The increase for this year is calculated at 37%. This is based on the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Price Index for Construction Items from 3rd Quarter 2020 to the 2nd Quarter 2023. This increase also includes the administration fee to manage the DIF program. The Building Industry Association (BIA) has been made aware of the adjustments proposed. For all developments, the fee increases would be effective 60 days from the date of adoption. It is not recommended that the City delay implementation if possible, as each passing month sees prices further rise and the resulting deficit further strains the City budget. Page 135 Page 7 2 1 2 8 EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEES: Fees approved through the adoption of the attached Resolutions and incorporated into the Master Fee Schedule would be effective January 2, 2024, for Community Services. For Building and Safety Services, Planning and Economic Development, and Engineering Services, the fees would be effective 60 days from the adoption of the Resolutions, consistent with State law. The annual fee adjustments would be effective on the first day of each fiscal year, July 1, as set forth in the fee resolutions, and staff would update the Master Fee Schedule accordingly. PUBLIC NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised fifteen (15) days in advance as a public hearing (1/8-page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. FISCAL IMPACT: By consistently examining user fees annually, these user fee updates provide additional revenue per fiscal year to offset the City's costs. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This action is in keeping with the Council's Core Value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future by taking actions to keep fees in line with costs over time. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2023-121 Attachment 2 - Resolution No. 2023-122 Attachment 3 - NBS Fee Study Page 136 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING, REPEALING, REVISING, AND UPDATING VARIOUS FEES APPLICABLE TO THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTS A Recitals. 1.The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2.Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3.On December 6, 2023, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2; The City has conducted a study of new or increasing fees/fee categories and analyzed costs incurred in providing services, including, but not limited to, salary and benefits, maintenance, and administrative costs. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make annual adjustments to certain fees based on an inflationary factor established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, where designated, effective July 1 of each year. SECTION 5: Building and Safety Services a.The City hereby repeals all fees for the Building and Safety Services Department services listed in Resolutions 18-040, 19-092, 20-004, 22-155, and adopts the fees in Exhibit A for services performed by the Building and Safety Department, effective February 5, 2024, including the current 7% Technology Fee and 10% General Plan Fee where applicable, effective 60 days from the adoption of this resolution consistent with State Law: ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 1 of 4 Page 137 b.The fee set forth in section 5a, with the exception of deposit-based fees, shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2024, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employment Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12-month period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding year, as released by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 6: Planning and Economic Development a.The City hereby repeals all fees for the Planning and Economic Development Department services listed in Resolutions 18-040, 18-112, 20-004, 21-129, and 22-155 and adopts the fees in Exhibit B for services performed by the Planning and Economic Development, including the current 7% Technology Fee and 10% General Plan Fee where applicable, effective 60 days from the adoption of this resolution consistent with State Law: b.The fee set forth in section 6a, with the exception of deposit-based fees, shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2024, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employment Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12-month period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding year, as released by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 7: Community Services a.The City hereby amends Resolutions 19-092 and 21-129 effective January 2, 2024, a n d adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Services Department: Title Summary of Change Fee 1.3: ActiveNet Transaction Fee Increase fee from 4% per transaction to 5% per transaction 5% 1.6.1: Facility Room Rental Cancellation and Rescheduling Fees - Banquet Hall Remove "Lions Center West" wording from the location section as this location is no longer a part of the Community Services Department. $50.00 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Rental Deposit New Fee for Section 1.6.3: 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Rental Deposit $100.00 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 2 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 2 $14.00 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 3 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 3 $19.50 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 4 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 4 $26.00 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 2 of 4 Page 138 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 5 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (exterior) - Group 5 $32.50 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (interior) - Rental Deposit New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (interior) - Rental Deposit $100.00 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 2 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 2 $23.50 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 3 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 3 $35.00 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 4 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 4 $46.50 1.6.3: Community Center Rental Fees - 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 5 New Fee for Section 1.6.3 1/2 Courts (interior) - Group 5 $57.50 1.6.6: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Stage portable) - Single 4'x8' deck Remove, fee no longer applicable Delete 1.6.8: Packages - RC Sports Center Party Package Remove, fee no longer applicable Delete 1.7.1: Community Softball Field and Soccer Field Rental - All Groups Remove, fee no longer applicable Delete 1.7.1: Community Softball Field and Soccer Field Rental - Group 2 Changing fees from a block of time to hourly $20.00 1.7.1: Community Softball Field and Soccer Field Rental - Group 3 Changing fees from a block of time to hourly $25.00 1.7.1: Community Softball Field and Soccer Field Rental - Group 4 Changing fees from a block of time to hourly $30.00 1.7.1: Community Softball Field and Soccer Field Rental - Group 5 Changing fees from a block of time to hourly $35.00 1.7.6: Open Space Park Areas (Not Designated as a Field) - Deposit New fee - Open Space Park areas, not designated as a field - Deposit $100.00 1.7.6: Open Space Park Areas (Not Designated as a Field) - Non-Commercial New fee - Open Space Park areas, not designated as a field - Non-Commercial $15.00 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 3 of 4 Page 139 1.7.6: Open Space Park Areas (Not Designated as a Field) - Commercial New fee - Open Space Park areas, not designated as a field - Commercial $25.00 1.4: Non-Resident Fees - Classes, workshops, and programs Language Change - Section 1.4 Classes, workshops, and programs. Change from Duration: One day or more to More than one day $13.00 b.The fee set forth in section 8a, with the exception of deposit-based fees, shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2024, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employment Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12-month period ending on December 31 of the immediately preceding year, as released by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2023 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 4 of 4 Page 140 Fee Title Fee Type New fee Amount Note Residential - Routed each $304.00 4 Residential - Non-routed each $121.00 4 Commercial - Routed each $380.00 4 Commercial - Non-routed each $153.00 4 No Plan Check Required Processing each $38.00 4 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 500 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $1,532.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 500 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $33.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 2,500 sf flat $2,185.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 2,500 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $20.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 5,000 sf flat $2,701.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 5,000 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $14.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 10,000 sf flat $3,384.00 A Class 1. W/food and/or drink 10,000 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $34.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 500 sf flat $1,366.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 500 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $28.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 2,500 sf flat $1,897.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 2,500 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $33.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 5,000 sf flat $2,716.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 5,000 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 10,000 sf flat $3,100.00 A Class 2. Without food and/or drink 10,000 sf each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $32.00 A Class 3. With food and/or drink over 300. Base Fee up to 2,000 sf flat $2,291.00 A Class 3. W/food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 2,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $17.00 Exhibit A City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 2023 Fees for Building and Safety Related Services and Activities Page 141 A Class 3. With food and/or drink over 300. Base fee up to 10,000 sf flat $3,626.00 A Class 3. W/food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $10.00 A Class 3. With food and/or drink over 300. Base fee up to 20,000 sf flat $4,628.00 A Class 3. W/food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 20,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $24.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 2,000 sf flat $1,821.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 2,000 sf Each Addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $17.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 10,000 sf flat $3,171.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $10.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 20,000 sf flat $4,142.00 A Class 4. Without food and/or drink over 300. Base fee of 20,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $20.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 500 sf flat $956.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 2,500 sf flat $1,150.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $18.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 5,000 sf flat $1,601.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 10,000 sf flat $1,980.00 B Class 1. Office and Public Buildings 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $20.00 B Class 2. Service 500 sf flat $1,241.00 B Class 2. Service 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $18.00 B Class 2. Service 2,500 sf flat $1,593.00 B Class 2. Service 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $14.00 Page 142 B Class 2. Service 5,000 sf flat $1,957.00 B Class 2. Service 5,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $40.00 B Class 3. Medical 500 sf flat $2,048.00 B Class 3. Serivce 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $34.00 B Class 3. Medical 2,500 sf flat $2,716.00 B Class 3. Serivce 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $39.00 B Class 3. Medical 5,000 sf flat $3,687.00 B Class 3. Service 5,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $74.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 500 sf flat $1,639.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $28.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 2,500 sf flat $2,185.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 s.f or fraction thereof flat $45.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 3,500 sf flat $2,625.00 B Class 4. Restaurant 3,500 sf Each addt’l 100 s.f or fraction thereof flat $75.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 500 sf flat $2,352.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $14.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 2,500 sf flat $2,640.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 s.f or fraction thereof flat $31.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 5,000 sf flat $3,384.00 B Class 5. Laboratories 5,000 sf Each addt’l 100 s.f or fraction thereof flat $68.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 500 sf flat $2,139.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $41.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 2,500 sf flat $2,944.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $31.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 5,000 sf flat $3,687.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 5,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $16.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 10,000 sf flat $4,506.00 E Class Day Care / Private school 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $45.00 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/F2 2,500 sf flat $1,836.00 Page 143 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/F2 2,500 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/ F2 10,000 sf flat $2,322.00 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/ F2 10,000 sf .Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/ F2 20,000 sf flat $2,989.00 Class F 1. Industrial / Manufacturing F1/ F2 20,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $15.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 2,500 sf flat $3,323.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 2,500 sf Each additional 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $15.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 10,000 sf flat $4,446.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 10,000 sf. Each additional 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $14.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 20,000 sf flat $5,872.00 Class H 1. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 20,000 sf. Each additional 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $30.00 Class I, All classifications 500 sf flat $2,048.00 Class I, All classifications 500 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $38.00 Class I, All classifications 2,500 sf flat $2,792.00 Class I, All classifications 2,500 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $31.00 Class I, All classifications 5,000 sf flat $3,535.00 Class I, All classifications 5,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $19.00 Class I, All classifications 10,000 sf flat $4,506.00 Class I, All classifications 10,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $45.00 Class M Retail 500 sf flat $1,942.00 Class M Retail 500 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $42.00 Class M Retail 2,500 sf flat $2,777.00 Class M Retail 2,500 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $16.00 Class M Retail 10,000 sf flat $3,990.00 Class M Retail 10,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $3.00 Class M Retail 50,000 sf flat $5,432.00 Class M Retail 50,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $4.00 Page 144 Class M Retail 100,000 sf flat $7,783.00 Class M Retail 100,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $8.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 10,000 sf flat $4,142.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 10,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 50,000 sf flat $5,022.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 50,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 250,000 sf $8,239.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 250,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 500,000 sf flat $10,059.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 500,000 sf, Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 1,000,000 sf flat $13,382.00 S Class S1/S2 Warehouses 1,000,000 sf. Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 2,500 sq ft flat $1,305.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 2,500 sq ft flat $8.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 10,000 sq ft flat $1,897.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 10,000 sq ft flat $7.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 20,000 sq ft flat $2,564.00 S Class S1 Mini Storage 20,000 sq ft flat $13.00 S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) up to 2500 sf flat Remove S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) 2,500 sf each addt’l 100 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat Remove S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) up to 10,000 sq ft flat Remove S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat Remove S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) up to 20,000 sq ft flat Remove S1 Mini Storage/ Parking Garages (open and closed) up to 20,000 sq ft, each addt 100 sf or fraction thereof flat Remove S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 10,000 sq ft flat $4,142.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 50,000 sq ft flat $5,037.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 50,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 Page 145 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 250,000 sq ft flat $8,512.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 250,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $1.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 500,000 sq ft flat $10,659.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 500,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $1.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 1,000,000 sq ft flat $13,420.00 S1 - Parking Garages (open or Closed) up to 1,000,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $1.00 S1 Repair Garage 500 sq ft flat $1,836.00 S1 Repair Garage 500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $50.00 S1 Repair Garage 2,500 sq ft flat $2,822.00 S1 Repair Garage 2,500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $28.00 S1 Repair Garage 5,000 sq ft flat $3,490.00 S1 Repair Garage 5,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $70.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 10,000 sq ft flat $3,763.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $3.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 50,000 sq ft flat $4,772.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 50,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 250,000 sq ft flat $9,066.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 250,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 500,000 sq ft flat $10,151.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 500,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 Page 146 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 1,000,000 sq ft flat $14,369.00 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 1,000,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $2.00 R Class R1/R2 500 sq ft flat $1,783.00 R Class R1/R2 500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $45.00 R Class R1/R2 2,500 sq ft flat $2,663.00 R Class R1/R2 2,500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $28.00 R Class R1/R2 10,000 sq ft flat $4,749.00 R Class R1/R2 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 R Class R1/R2 50,000 sq ft flat $7,503.00 R Class R1/R2 50,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $8.00 R Class R1/R2 100,000 sq ft flat $11,516.00 R Class R1/R2 100,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 R1/R2 Major Remodels 500 sq ft flat $1,722.00 R Class R1/R2 major remodels 500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $59.00 R1/R2 Major Remodels 2,500 sq ft flat $2,906.00 R Class R1/R2 major remodels 2,500 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $24.00 R1/R2 Major Remodels 10,000 sq ft flat $4,726.00 R Class R1/R2 major remodels 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 R1/R2 Major Remodels 50,000 sq ft flat $7,888.00 R Class R1/R2 major remodels 50,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 R1/R2 Major Remodels 100,000 sq ft flat $11,933.00 R Class R1/R2 major remodels 100,000 sq ft, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 R2 Production Rate 2,500 sf flat $933.00 R2 Production Rate 2,500 sf, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 R2 Production Rate 10,000 sf flat $1,692.00 R2 Production Rate 10,000 sf, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 R2 Production Rate 20,000 sf flat $2,299.00 R2 Production Rate 20,000 sf, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 R2.1 500 sq ft flat $2,299.00 Page 147 R2.1 500 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $30.00 R2.1 2,500 sq ft flat $2,875.00 R2.1 2,500 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $28.00 R2.1 10,000 sq ft flat $4,961.00 R2.1 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $6.00 R2.1 50,000 sq ft flat $7,503.00 R2.1 50,000 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $7.00 R2.1 100,000 sq ft flat $11,213.00 R2.1 100,000 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $11.00 R3 500 sq ft flat $1,912.00 R3 500 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $40.00 R3 2,500 sq ft flat $2,701.00 R3 2,500 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $44.00 R3 5,000 sq ft flat $3,809.00 R3 5,000 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $10.00 R3 10,000 sq ft flat $4,340.00 R3 10,000 sq ft, each addt’l sf or fraction thereof flat $43.00 R3 Production rate 500 sf flat $1,457.00 R3 Production rate 500 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $21.00 R3 Production rate 2,500 sf flat $1,882.00 R3 Production rate 5,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $12.00 R3 Production rate 10,000 sf flat $2,974.00 R3 Production rate 10,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $30.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 500 sf flat $1,570.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $26.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 2,500 sf flat $2,086.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $33.00 Page 148 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 5,000 sf flat $2,906.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 5,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $5.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 10,000 sf flat $3,118.00 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build- Out only) 10,000 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $32.00 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 500 sf flat $1,609.00 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $40.00 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 2,500 sf flat $2,398.00 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 2,500 sf Each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $96.00 R4 500 sq ft flat $2,299.00 R4 500 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $30.00 R4 2,500 sf flat $2,875.00 R4 2,500 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $1.00 R4 5,000 sf flat $2,906.00 R4 5,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $4.00 R4 10,000 sf flat $4,787.00 R4 10,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat $6.00 R4 50,000 sf flat Remove R4 50,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat Remove R4 100,000 sf flat Remove R4 100,000 sf, each addt’l 100 sf or fraction thereof flat Remove Antenna each $689.00 New Cell Tower w/equipment shelter each $2,157.00 1 Cell Site Modification each $438.00 Tent 200-400 sq ft each $346.00 1 Tent / Awning 401 + sq ft each $447.00 1 Balcony/Deck - first 500 sq ft each $491.00 1 Balcony/Deck - each additional 500 sq ft each $476.00 1 Demolition Residential each $447.00 Demolition multi family/commercial each $462.00 Shoring each $243.00 4 Retrofit windows 1-5 windows each $395.00 1, 4 Retrofit windows 6-15 windows each $467.00 1, 4 Page 149 Retrofit windows 16 +each $611.00 1, 4 New Construction 1-5 windows each $395.00 1, 4 New Construction 6-15 windows each $467.00 1, 4 New Construction 16 + windows - Hourly each $611.00 1, 4 Dock Levelers each $538.00 1, 4 Block wall 3-6 ft High - 1st 100 linear ft each $395.00 1 Block wall 3-6 ft High - each add'l 50 linear ft each $101.00 1 Masonry pilasters 1-10 each $182.00 1 Fence (wood, wrought iron, chain link) over 6' high each $537.00 1 Fire place - masonry each $510.00 1, 4 Fire place pre fab metal each $522.00 4 flagpole over 20' high each $431.00 1 Garage first 500 sq ft each $795.00 Garage each additional 500 sq ft each $326.00 Patio cover - 1st 1,000 sq ft (standard and pre- engineered each $340.00 1 Patio cover - each additional 500 sq ft each $213.00 1 Patio cover - pre-engineered 1st 500 sq ft each Remove Patio cover- pre-engineered- each additional 500 sq ft each Remove Patio enclosure First 500 sq ft each $613.00 1 Patio enclosure each additional 500 sq ft each $290.00 1 Defensible Space hourly $160.00 4 Barn/storage shed up to 500 sq ft each $643.00 1 Barn/storage shed each additional 500 sq ft each $290.00 1 Septic pre-inspection hourly $152.00 1 Relocate building each $1,144.00 1 Retaining wall- 1st 100 linear ft each $491.00 1 Retaining wall over 6' high each $537.00 1 Bathroom Remodel each $455.00 1, 4 Interior Remodel (residential) first 500 sq ft each $756.00 1, 4 Interior Remodel (residential) - Each additional 500 sq ft each $366.00 1, 4 Light Standards - first 5 each $734.00 1 Light Standards - each additional 500 sq ft each $54.00 1 Mobile home- Not in MH Park each $1,177.00 Temporary Building/Trailer each $734.00 Demising wall 1-100 linear feet- commercial each $840.00 1, 4 Demising wall each additional 100 linear feet- commercial each $183.00 1, 4 Page 150 Partition wall 1-50 linear feet- commercial each $507.00 1, 4 Partition wall each additional 50 linear feet- commercial each $183.00 1, 4 Signs blade, channel each $303.00 1 Signs - Monument Signs each $455.00 1 Signs- Walls signs each $379.00 1 Skylights / Smoke Hatches 1 - 10 each $580.00 1, 4 Prefab spa/ hot tub each $598.00 4 Stairs- each flight / story each $507.00 1, 4 Storage racks and catwalks- 1st 500 sq ft each $732.00 1, 4 Storage racks and catwalks- 501 sq ft-250,000 sq ft each $1,214.00 1, 4 Storage racks and catwalks- over 251,000 sq ft each $1,881.00 1, 4 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 0-500sq ft each $987.00 1, 4 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 501- 5000 sq ft each $1,316.00 1, 4 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 5001 + sq ft each $1,616.00 1, 4 Vinyl Lined or Fiberglass swimming pool - residential each $598.00 1, 4 Gunite swimming pool / spa- residential each $712.00 1, 4 Commercial swimming pool each $1,174.00 1, 4 Utility Release (Utility Connection) Processing Fee each Remove Utility Release (Utility Connection) Inspection (First Meter)per meter $152.00 4 Utility Release (Utility Connection) Inspection - ea. additional meter based on one hour fee each $152.00 4 Tile Lift and Re-lay Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each $370.00 4 Tile Lift and Re-lay Roof- each additional 1,000 sq ft each $303.00 4 Residential Composition Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each $309.00 1, 4 Residential Composition Roof- each additional 1,000 sq ft each $152.00 4 Re-roofing - first 50,000 commercial each $431.00 Re-roofing - each additional 50,000 commercial each $159.00 Residential Tile Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each $417.00 4 Residential Tile Roof - each additional 1,000 sq ft each $225.00 4 Roof framing (replacement) - 1st 1,000 sq ft residential each $394.00 1 Page 151 Roof framing (replacement) each additional 500 sq ft each $400.00 1 Roof coating- Commercial each $613.00 1 Roof coating- Residential each $324.00 4 Roof Repair up to 400 sq ft each $152.00 4 Room addition- up to 500 sq ft each $1,053.00 4 Room addition- each additional 500 sq ft each $507.00 1 Spray booth first 500 sq ft each $1,296.00 1 Sauna- pre-fabricated each $405.00 1, 4 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer first 500 sq ft each $491.00 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer each additional 500 sq ft each $290.00 Solar/ PV up to 15 KW-residential each $173.00 1 Solar/photovoltaic- ea. Kw over 15 Kw - Residential per kw $12.00 1 Solar/photovoltaic 30.1 + kw Residential each Remove 1 Solar/PV 0-250 KW- Commercial per kw $1,000.00 1 Solar/photovoltaic - ea. Kw over 250 Kw - commercial each $5.00 1 Residential Solar power storage system each Remove 1 Solar power storage system Commercial each $1,185.00 1 EV Charger each $303.00 4 Swimming Pool Remodel each $455.00 4 Swimming Pool Replaster each $334.00 4 Trash Enclosure up to 100 linear ft each $455.00 4 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO)each $152.00 4 Insulation/ drywall first 500 sq ft each $288.00 4 Insulation/ drywall each additional 500 sq ft each $288.00 4 Percolation inspection (septic)each $213.00 4 ADA/ Seismic Review hourly $152.00 4 Cabana- outdoor living area with walls each $1,072.00 1 Fuel dispensing system each $1,559.00 4 Above ground tanks each $1,559.00 Carport- first 500 sq ft each $827.00 1 Carport - each additional 500 sq ft hourly $364.00 1 Hourly review by Engineer hourly Remove Structural Calculation review (hourly)hourly $153.00 4 Re-inspection Fee (hourly)hourly $153.00 4 Plan Check (hourly)hourly $153.00 4 Inspection (hourly)hourly $153.00 4 Scanning for Electronic Plan Review up to 5 shee each Remove Scanning for Electronic Plan Review 6-10 sheets each Remove Page 152 Scanning for Electronic Plan Review up to 10 she ets - Letter Size each Remove Scanning for Electronic Plan Review 11 to 20 she ets - letter size each Remove Plan Duplication Fee includes flash drive each $76.00 4 Change of Address - City Review hourly $653.00 3, 4 Change of Address -Recording and Mapping hourly $653.00 3, 4 Occupancy Inspection each $280.00 4 Sewer and Water each $412.00 4 Hourly Minimum includes processing hourly $152.00 4 Public Art- Structural Review hourly $433.00 3, 4 Outsourced Plan Check City Facilitation of Consultant each Remove Outsourced Plan check Contractor each Remove HVAC system- residential each $304.00 4 HVAC system- ea. additional system each $46.00 4 Exhaust hood, vent fan, ventilation system, Heating unit, compressor, or Evaporative cooler Residential/commercial each each $291.00 Package unit or split system- residential each $230.00 4 Package unit or split system- ea. additional system each $152.00 4 Ductwork only each $154.00 4 Freezer/cooler- 1st 500 sq ft commercial each $491.00 4 Freezer/cooler- 501-50,000 sq ft commercial each $947.00 4 Freezer/cooler- 51,000 + sq ft commercial each $1,174.00 4 Type II hoods or other ventilation system -each $643.00 4 Exhaust Hood Type I- commercial each $1,098.00 4 Dust Collection System- commercial each $1,590.00 Cooling tower or heat exchange- commercial each $1,055.00 MEC Insp Permits - All each $303.00 5 Sewer /water service connection- residential each $191.00 4 Plumbing or gas fixtures -first 5 fixtures residential each $230.00 4 Plumbing or gas fixtures -each additional residential each $39.00 4 Private sewage disposal system (new/altered- each residential)each $457.00 4 Re-piping up to 20 fixtures - residential each $304.00 4 Water service line- residential each $191.00 4 Page 153 Backflow preventer- first 5 residential each $230.00 4 Backflow preventer- each additional each $15.00 4 Water heater- each residential each $91.00 4 Tankless water heater-residential each $167.00 4 Graywater system - residential each $154.00 4 Solar water system - residential each $230.00 4 Repair- Drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- Residential each $154.00 4 Sewer connection - commercial each $381.00 4 Plumbing or gas fixtures- first 5 commercial each $154.00 4 Plumbing or gas fixtures- each additional commercial each $304.00 4 Private sewage disposal system- commercial each $458.00 4 Grease interceptor- commercial each $191.00 4 Backflow preventer- commercial each $458.00 4 Solar water system - Commercial each $381.00 4 Graywater System - commercial each $304.00 4 Medical Gas system each $914.00 4 Repair drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- commercial each $230.00 4 Water heater- commercial each $304.00 4 Tankless water heater - commercial each $381.00 4 PLM Insp Permits - All each $228.00 5 Outdoor events- carnival rides, electric generators each $381.00 Meter pedestal each $191.00 4 Electrical for alumawood patio cover/enclosure - 1-10 lights, outlets, switches each $76.00 4 Temporary power pole meter panel (each)each $167.00 4 Temporary power pole- distribution panel (each)each $77.00 4 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures- first 10 each $167.00 4 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures -each additional fixture each $38.00 4 Appliances, apparatus- residential each $230.00 4 Appliances, apparatus- Commercial each $230.00 4 Motors, generators- residential each $230.00 4 Motors, generators, transformer- commercial each $381.00 4 Electrical Service less than 400 amp each $303.00 4 Page 154 Electrical service panel 401 amp - 1200 amp- commercial each $534.00 4 Electrical service panel over 1200 amp- commercial each $762.00 4 Conduits for future use up to 500'each $191.00 4 Conduits for future use each addt'l 500'each $76.00 4 ELE Insp Permits - All each $251.00 5 MEP fee (hourly) includes re-inspection fee hourly $154.00 4 MEP Plan check (hourly)hourly $154.00 4 MEP Plan check by engineer hourly $154.00 4 BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE FEES Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction 1-20 Heads each $303.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction 21- 100 Heads each $759.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction 101- 200 Heads each $910.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction 201- 350 Heads each $1,062.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction 351+ Heads each $1,448.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family) 1-20 Heads each $152.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family) 21-100 Heads each $455.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family) 101-200 Head each $531.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family) 201-350 Heads each $607.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family) 351+ Heads each $759.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 1-4 Heads each $303.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 5-20 Heads each $455.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 21-100 Heads each $607.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 101-200 Heads each $759.00 2 Page 155 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 201-350 Heads each $910.00 2 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) 351+ Heads each $1,214.00 2 Standard Hourly Rate hourly $154.00 2 Hydraulic Calculation hourly $154.00 Dry Pipe Valve each $0.00 Private Underground Fire Service - First 1-5 each $762.00 Private Underground Fire Service - Each additional each $304.00 Public Underground Fire Service - First 1-5 each $762.00 Public Underground Fire Service - Each additional each $304.00 Deluge / Pre-Action each $1,067.00 5 Fire Pump each $1,144.00 5 Gravity each $914.00 5 Pressure each $914.00 5 Call I, II, & III Stand Pipe each $304.00 5 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System 0-15 Devices each $834.00 2 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System 16- 50 Devices each $1,138.00 2 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System 51- 100 Devices each $1,441.00 2 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System 101- 500 Devices each $2,200.00 2 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System each additional 25 Devices each $182.00 2 Standard Hourly Rate hourly $154.00 5 Clean Agent Gas Systems each $1,067.00 5 Dry Chemical Systems each $914.00 5 Wet Chemical/ Kitchen Hood each $610.00 5 Foam Systems each $610.00 5 Misc. FD Access hourly $154.00 5 Refrigerant Monitoring System each $914.00 5 High Pile Storage 500- 25,000 sqft each $1,067.00 5 High Pile Storage 25,000 - 100,000 sqft each $1,372.00 5 High Pile Storage each additional 100,000 sf each $304.00 5 Life Safety and FPP each $154.00 5 Hazardous Material Inventory Statement (HMIS)hourly $154.00 5 Hazardous Material Management Plan (HMMP)hourly $154.00 5 Re-Inspection Fee hourly $154.00 5 Page 156 BUILDING AND SAFETY Notes [1]If structural calculations are submitted a calculation review will be assessed in addition to the base fee. [2]If combo permits stack up and exceed the remodel fee, we use the remodel fee instead of a combo of MPEs [3]Fees includes multiple department reviews [4]Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee [5]Shown for analysis purposes only. Should not be adopted / published as a fee for service. BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE FEES Notes [1]For all multi-story projects, the fire sprinkler fee is calculated per floor based on the number of heads on that floor and the number of hydraulic calculation areas. [2]Please add the fee for each Hydraulic Calculation area from the Miscellaneous Fire Sprinkler and Underground Work to each floor/per head fees to estimate the total plan check and permit fees. [3]The above fees cover typical projects. The fees for certain unique projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building & Safety Services Director and/or Fire District. It will be based on the overhead cost and the time of service [4]The Total Fee breakdown consist of a Technology Fee plus Plan Review & Inspection Fees (57% Plan Review + 43% Inspection). [5]Fees are established by the Fire District Page 157 Fee Title Fee Type New Fee Note PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES 1 Additional Hearing Required Per hearing $2,690.00 4 Adult Entertainment Permit Deposit $15,000.00 5 Annexation Deposit $40,000.00 5 Appeal of a Planning Commission decision Flat $3,500.00 Appeal of Planning Director decision Flat $2,200.00 Business License Review Flat $90.00 4 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee Per development $448.00 4 Certificate of Appropriateness - Residential/Non- Profit Flat $- Certificate of Appropriateness - All others Flat $8,265.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Administrative Approval Flat $5,629.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - PC Approval Flat $10,157.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - CC Approval Flat $10,157.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification - Administrative Approval Flat $2,855.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification - PC Approval Flat $4,850.00 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification - CC Approval Flat $5,039.00 County Recording Fee Flat Actual Cost 4 Courtesy Review Flat $2,167.00 4 Development Agreement Deposit $50,000.00 5 Development Agreement - Modification Deposit $25,000.00 5 Density Bonus Agreement Deposit $50,000.00 5 Density Bonus Agreement- Modification Deposit $25,000.00 5 Development Code Amendment Deposit $15,000.00 5 Entertainment Permit - Administrative Approval Flat $5,225.00 Entertainment Permit - PC Approval Flat $9,787.00 Entertainment Permit - Modification - Administrative Approval Flat $2,802.00 Entertainment Permit - Modification - PC Approval Flat $4,483.00 Entertainment Permit- Annual Renewal Flat $950.00 Exhibit B City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Economic Development Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 2023 Fees for Planning and Economic Development Related Services and Activities Page 158 Fee Title Fee Type New Fee Note Environmental/CEQA Review - Exemption Flat $112.00 Environmental Impact Report - City Administrative Processing Deposit $50,000.00 5 Environmental Impact Report - Consultant Cost Flat Actual Cost Environmental Impact Report - City Attorney Fee Flat Actual Cost 2 Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR) - City Administrative Processing Deposit $10,000.00 5 Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR) - Consultant Cost Flat Actual Cost Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR) - City Attorney Fee Flat Actual Cost 2 Film Permit Flat $550.00 4 General Plan Amendment Deposit $25,000.00 5 Hillside Design Review - 1 Unit Flat $10,994.00 Hillside Design Review - 2- 4 Units Deposit $15,000.00 5 Hillside Design Review - 5+ units Deposit $25,000.00 5 Home Occupation Permit Flat $112.00 4 Land Use Verification Report Flat $897.00 4 Landmark Application Flat $- Landscape Plan Review - New Development Reviewed by City Staff Flat $1,773.00 4 Landscape Plan Review - New Development City Administrative Processing Fee Flat $392.00 4 Landscape Plan Review - New Development Consultant Cost Flat Actual Cost 4 Major Design Review - Single Family Residential 5-10 units Flat $18,238.00 Major Design Review - Single Family Residential 11-25 units Flat $23,886.00 Major Design Review - Single Family Residential 26+ units Flat $33,811.00 Major Design Review - Multi-Family Residential 2-10 units Flat $18,724.00 Major Design Review - Multi-Family Residential 11-75 units Flat $24,803.00 Page 159 Fee Title Fee Type New Fee Note Major Design Review - Multi-Family Residential 76+ units Flat $36,440.00 Major Design Review - Commercial Uses 0-50,000 Square Feet Flat $18,070.00 Major Design Review - Commercial Uses 50,001-150,000 Square Feet Flat $24,558.00 Major Design Review - Commercial Uses 150,001+ Square Feet Flat $37,378.00 Major Design Review - Industrial Zones 0-150,000 Square Feet Flat $17,487.00 Major Design Review - Industrial Zones 151,000-300,000 Square Feet Flat $22,210.00 Major Design Review - Industrial Zones 300,001+ Square Feet Flat $28,748.00 Major Design Review - Mixed-Use Zones Flat $38,500.00 Major Design Review - Modification - Administrative Approval Flat $1,793.00 Major Design Review - Modification - PC Approval Flat $2,690.00 Major Design Review - Modification - CC Approval Flat $3,362.00 Massage Business Permit Flat $3,951.00 4 Massage Business Permit - Ancillary Flat $1,600.00 4 Massage Business Permit - Annual Renewal Flat $1,062.00 4 Mills Act Application Flat $-4 Minor Design Review - Residential Flat $3,900.00 Minor Design Review - Commercial/Industrial Flat $8,600.00 Minor Design Review - Modification - Residential Flat $1,900.00 Minor Design Review - Modification - Commercial/Industrial Flat $4,109.00 Minor Exception Administrative Approval - Resident Flat $871.00 Minor Exception Administrative Approval - All Other Flat $3,497.00 Minor Exception PC Approval Flat $6,341.00 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Flat $1,121.00 4 Planning Department Hourly Rate Hourly $224.00 Property Ownership List - 100 feet or less (small application) Flat $-4 Property Ownership List - 101-660 feet (standard)Flat $45.00 4 Page 160 Fee Title Fee Type New Fee Note Property Ownership List - over 660 feet (custom)Flat $90.00 4 Public Convenience or Necessity (ABC License)Flat $4,630.00 4 Public Noticing Staff Time - small mailer (< 200)Flat $448.00 3, 4 Public Noticing Staff Time - Large mailer (200 +)Flat $897.00 3, 4 Public Noticing Advertising Flat $630.00 4 SB 330 Preliminary Application Fee Flat $672.00 4 Sign Permit Flat $269.00 4 Similar Use Determination Flat $5,021.00 Site Development Review - Residential Flat $755.00 Site Development Review - Commercial/industrial Flat $3,029.00 Specific Plan - New Deposit $45,000.00 5 Specific Plan Amendment Deposit $15,000.00 5 Master Plan - New Deposit $25,000.00 5 Master Plan Amendment Deposit $10,000.00 5 Street Name Change Flat $9,769.00 Technical Report Review - City Administrative Processing fee Flat $1,793.00 4 Technical Report Review - Consultant Cost Flat Actual Cost Technical Report Review - City Attorney Fee Flat Actual Cost 2 Temporary Use Permit - Model Home Sales Office / Temporary Offices Flat $3,994.00 4 Temporary Use Permit - Non-Profit Flat $250.00 4 Temporary Use Permit - Residential (non- commercial) Haunted Houses Flat No Charge 4 Temporary Use Permit - All Others Flat $875.00 4 Tentative Parcel Map Flat $7,846.00 Tentative Parcel Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) Flat $3,556.00 Tentative Tract Map 5 - 10 lots Flat $10,370.00 Tentative Tract Map 11 - 25 lots Flat $12,822.00 Tentative Tract Map 26+ lots Deposit $15,000.00 5 Tentative Tract Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) Flat $5,885.00 Third and subsequent submittal review Flat $1,748.00 Time Extension Administrative Approval Flat $2,793.00 Time Extension PC Approval Flat $9,367.00 Trail Easement Vacation Flat $8,800.00 Transfer of Development Rights Flat $3,206.00 Page 161 Fee Title Fee Type New Fee Note Tree Removal Permits - Single Family Residential - Live Trees Flat $275.00 Tree Removal Permits - Single Family Residential - Dead Trees Flat No Charge Tree Removal Permits - Multi- Family/Commercial/Industrial - Administrative Approval up to 4 trees Flat $1,026.00 Tree Removal Permits - Multi- Family/Commercial/Industrial - Administrative Approval 5 or more trees Flat $1,856.00 Tree Removal Permits - New Development 1 - 10 trees Flat $2,371.00 Tree Removal Permits - New Development 11 - 20 trees Flat $3,380.00 Tree Removal Permits - New Development 21+ trees Flat $4,613.00 Tree Removal Permits - Processing fee for tree removed with no permit Flat $336.00 Tribal Consultation Flat $2,242.00 4 Uniform Sign Program Flat $4,999.00 4 Uniform Sign Program Modification Flat $2,824.00 4 Variance Flat $6,953.00 Zoning Map Amendment Flat $17,530.00 7 General Plan Maintenance Fee Surcharge 10% Technology Fee Surcharge 7% REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS 1 On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign Deposit $706.00 6 Off-Site Subdivision sign case deposit per sign Deposit $706.00 6 Notice of Filing Sign (per sign)Deposit $971.00 6 Temporary Use Permit Model Home Restoration Deposit Deposit $883.00 6 Fees for development entitlements or services not listed will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Planning Director. It will be based on the fully burdened hourly rate and the time of service provided. Applications requiring three or more entitlements from the fee list will use the fee schedule to establish a deposit amount. [Notes] [1] These fees listed are the base fee. Unless expressly exempted, the General Plan Maintenance Fee and Technology Fee will be added to all fees. [2] City Attorney fee charged based on actual cost. Page 162 [3] Advertising fee is charged per advertisement. Where advertising in the newspaper is not required, but only mailers are required, only staff time will be charged. [4] Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee [5] Technology fee and General Plan Maintenance Fee will be charged at current rates and deducted from the deposit amount [6] Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee or the Technology Fee [7] Includes Overlay Districts Page 163 ATTACHMENT 2 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2020-122, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On December 2, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted, Resolution No. 2020-122, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for described capital improvements and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 4. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) requires that project costs and fees, including Transportation Development Fees (DIF), be updated biennially. 5. The increase for this year is calculated at 37%; this is based on the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Price Index for Construction Items, from 3rd Quarter 2020 - 2nd Quarter 2023. The increase includes an administration fee to manage the DIF program. 6. On December 6, 2023, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the c. Public facilities described or identified in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto; and Page 164 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 2 of 3 4 2 5 2 d. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and f. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit “B”, and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and g. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit “A” are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. C. DEFINITIONS: 1. “Development projects” shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A “development project” includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. 2. “Exempted development” shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. 3. “Equivalent dwelling unit” or “EDU”, is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee:The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid per Chapter 3.28 City-Wide System Fee for Transportation Development subsection 3.28.020 Fees established of the RCMC. The City Engineer, or their designee, shall calculate and determine the amount of the fee based upon the rate then in effect at the time of payment. 5. Fee Schedule:The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $17,358 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit “C”. 6.EDU/Land Use Equivalent Schedule:The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) – Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Page 165 Resolution No. 2023-XXX - Page 3 of 3 4 2 5 2 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care / Private School - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7.Use of Fee:The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit “A”, or for reimbursing the City for development’s fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit “A”. 8.Administration Fee:The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9.Fee Review:The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts for the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10.Effective Date:This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein amended shall not be imposed by the City until 60 days from the date of the public hearing. 11.Judicial Challenge:Any judicial action proceeding to appeal, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12.Certification:The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2023 Page 166 Exhibit “A” Transportation Fee Program Projects & Project Costs Freeway Interchanges Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $1,245,507 F2 Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $1,946,088 F3 Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $29,040,750 F4 Arrow Route at I-15 Freeway - Interchange $72,383,900 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at I-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $7,925,245 Total: $112,550,488 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $19,091,033 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $1,549,826 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $1,549,826 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $2,507,681 Total:$24,698,365 Bridges Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $3,610,389 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,711,853 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $1,680,152 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,912,626 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $10,924,509 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $2,106,354 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $2,167,995 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $3,650,896 Total:$27,764,773 Page 167 Streets Project Estimate S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $1,172,936 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,372,290 S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O I-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O I-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,968,983 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,738,270 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $14,334,126 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to I-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,731,226 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to I-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $2,097,548 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,247,247 S9 East Avenue - I-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $1,437,111 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $2,280,709 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $771,390 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $7,264,807 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $496,649 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $1,636,123 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $924,612 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,120,443 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $3,399,049 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $12,759,644 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $3,450,123 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,891,492 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,164,130 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to I-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $21,729,259 S23 Lower Crest Road - Day Creek Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $2,828,432 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,272,587 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $537,155 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to I-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $517,783 Page 168 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $1,514,602 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $12,018,193 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $995,058 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $10,566,993 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $16,554,955 Total: $138,793,926 Traffic Signals Project8,9 Estimate T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $940,000 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $940,000 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $940,000 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $940,000 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $940,000 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $940,000 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $940,000 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $940,000 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $940,000 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $940,000 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $940,000 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $940,000 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $940,000 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $940,000 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $940,000 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $940,000 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $940,000 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $940,000 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $940,000 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $940,000 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue (West)$940,000 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $940,000 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $940,000 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $940,000 Page 169 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $940,000 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $940,000 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $940,000 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $940,000 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $940,000 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $940,000 T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $940,000 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $940,000 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $940,000 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $940,000 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $940,000 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $940,000 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $940,000 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $940,000 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $940,000 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $940,000 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $940,000 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $940,000 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $940,000 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $940,000 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $940,000 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $940,000 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $940,000 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $940,000 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West)$940,000 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $940,000 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $940,000 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $940,000 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 Page 170 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $100,000 Total:$55,280,000 Signal Interconnect System Project Estimate SI1 Signal Interconnect System $13,560,974 Total:$13,560,974 Program Totals Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $112,550,488 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $24,698,365 Bridges $27,764,773 Streets $138,793,926 Traffic Signals $55,280,000 Signal Interconnect System $13,560,974 Total:$372,648,527 DIF Program Cost Item Estimate Program Total $372,648,527 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Page 171 Sub-Total 352,648,527 Administration Fee (15%)$52,897,279 Total:$405,545,806 Page 172 EXHIBIT “B” TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $17,358 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit $10,415 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $10,415 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) – Per Bedroom $3,472 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $3,472 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $26,037 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $20,830 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $10,415 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $8,679 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $13,886 Day Care / Private School - Per Student $4,340 Self-Storage - Per Unit $347 Service Station - Per Pump $86,790 Page 173 EXHIBIT “C” TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Land as of February 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi-Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5 then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) per Land Use Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the “Equivalent Dwelling Units” or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type’s EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) – Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care / Private School - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU Page 174 Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Land Use Vacant Land as of February 2005 EDU by Land Use Future Equivalent Dwelling Units Single-Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi-Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park (per 1,000 SF) 15,659,820 Square Feet 0.60 9,396 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) 3,637,260 Square Feet 1.50 5,455 Total Future EDU 23,363 Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Fees Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU (as of February 2005)23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use Item EDU by Land Use Fees Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU $17,358 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $10,415 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $10,415 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) – Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU $3,472 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU $3,472 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU $26,037 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU $20,830 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU $10,415 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU $8,679 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU $13,886 Day Care / Private School - Per Student 0.25 EDU $4,340 Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU $347 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU $86,790 Page 175 nbsgov.com Prepared by: Corporate Headquarters 32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92592 Toll free: 800.676.7516 Report for: Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments Final Report NOVEMBER 22, 2023 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 176 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Findings ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Report Format ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction and Fundamentals ...................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scope of Study ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Methods of Analysis .................................................................................................. 3 Planning Department Fee Program ............................................................................... 10 3.1 Cost of Service Analysis ........................................................................................... 10 3.2 Fee Establishment ................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation ........................................................................................ 12 3.4 Comparison Survey.................................................................................................. 13 Building and safety service fees .................................................................................... 14 4.1 Cost of Service Analysis ........................................................................................... 14 4.2 Fee Establishment ................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation ........................................................................................ 16 4.4 Comparison Survey.................................................................................................. 17 General Plan Maintenance Surcharge ............................................................................ 18 5.1 Cost of Service Analysis ........................................................................................... 18 5.2 Fee Establishment ................................................................................................... 18 5.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation ........................................................................................ 20 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 21 Page 177 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 3 Appendices Cost of Service Analysis (Fee Tables) Planning Department Appendix A.1 Building and Safety Department Appendix A.2 Building and Safety – Fire Fees Appendix A.3 Comparative Fee Surveys Planning Department Appendix B.1 Building and Safety Department Appendix B.2 Page 178 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NBS performed a Fee Study for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments. The purpose of this report is to present the findings and recommendations of the various fee analyses performed as part of the Study and provide the City with the information needed to update and establish user and regulatory fees for service. Throughout the process, the Study afforded much effort to ensure that not only are the fees and charges reasonable and equitable, but that they also meet industry standards and uphold the statutory requirements of the State of California. California cities, counties, and special districts may impose user and regulatory fees for services and activities they provide through provisions set forth in the State Constitution, Article XIII C § 1. Under this legal framework, a fee may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or performing the activity. For a fee to qualify as such, it must relate to a service or activity performed at the request of an individual or entity upon which the fee is imposed, or their actions specifically cause the local government agency to perform additional activities. In this instance, the service or underlying action causing the local agency to perform the service is either discretionary and/or is subject to regulation. As a discretionary service or regulatory activity, the fees considered in this Study fall outside of the definition and statutory requirement to impose general taxes, special taxes, and fees as a result of property ownership. The City’s main reason for conducting this Study was twofold: (1) first, to ensure that existing fees do not exceed the costs of service, and (2) second, to provide an opportunity for the City Council to re-align fee amounts with localized cost recovery policies. 1.1 Findings This Study examined the fee programs managed by the City’s Planning and Building and Safety departments. The Study identified an estimated $5.5 million in eligible costs for recovery from fees for service compared to approximately $4.8 million the City is currently collecting each year from fees. The following table provides a summary of the Study’s results: Table 1. Report Summary As shown in Table 1 above, the City is recovering approximately 88% of the costs associated with providing user and regulatory fee-related services. Should the Council adopt fees at 100% of the full cost recovery amounts determined by this Study, an additional $1 million in costs could be recovered. Department / Division Estimated Annual Current Fee Revenue Estimated Annual Full Cost Recovery Fee Revenue Annual Cost Recovery Surplus / (Deficit) Current Cost Recovery % Estimated Annual Recommended Fee Revenue Recommended Cost Recovery % Planning Department $ 850,758 $ 1,218,263 $ (367,505)69.8% $ 1,218,263 100.0% Building & Safety Department 3,606,421 3,873,928 (267,506) 93.1% 3,860,075 99.6% General Plan Maintenance Surcharge 376,284 408,596 (408,596) 92.1% 256,820 62.9% Total $ 4,833,464 $ 5,500,788 $ (1,043,608)87.9% $ 5,335,158 97.0% Page 179 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 2 However, Section 2.2.3 later explains, there may be other local policy considerations that support adopting fees at less than the calculated full cost recovery amount. Since this element of the Study is subjective, NBS provided the maximum potential of fee amounts at 100% full cost recovery for the City to consider. Once the City Council has reviewed and evaluated the results of the Study, the City can set fees at appropriate cost recovery levels according to local policy goals and considerations. 1.2 Report Format This report documents the analytical methods and data sources used in the Study, presents findings regarding current levels of cost recovery achieved from user and regulatory fees, discusses recommended fee amounts, and provides a comparative survey of fees to neighboring agencies for similar services. The report is organized into the following sections:  Section 2 - Outlines the general framework, approach, and methodology of the Fee Study.  Sections 3 through 5 - Discusses the results of the cost of service analysis performed by department and/or fee program. The analysis includes: (1) fully burdened hourly rate(s); (2) calculation of the costs of providing service; (3) the cost recovery performance of each fee category; and (4) the staff-recommended fees for providing services.  Section 6 - Presents the conclusions of the analysis provided in the preceding sections.  Appendices to this report - Include additional details of the analysis performed and a comparison of the fees imposed by neighboring agencies for similar services. Page 180 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 3 INTRODUCTION AND FUNDAMENTALS 2.1 Scope of Study The following is a summary of the fees evaluated during the Study:  Planning Department o Appeal fees o Development Agreements o Environmental / CEQA Review o Design review o Conditional /Special Use permits o Tentative Parcel / Subdivision Maps o Other types of Planning entitlements, and permits o Cyclical General plan maintenance, update, and implementation  Building and Safety Services Department o Department Processing Fees o Commercial New Construction, Addition, and TI permits & plan checks o Residential New Construction permits and plan checks o Miscellaneous minor residential permits o Mechanical, plumbing, electrical permits, and plan checks o Fire Alarm Systems o Fire Sprinkler Systems The fees examined in this Study specifically excluded utility rates, development impact fees, and special assessments, all of which fall under distinct analytical and procedural requirements different from the body of user/regulatory fees analyzed in this effort. Additionally, this Study and the excluded facility and equipment rental rates, as well as most of fines and penalties that may be imposed by the City for violations to its requirements or code. (The City is not limited to the costs of service when charging for entrance to or use of government property, or when imposing fines and penalties. 2.2 Methods of Analysis Three phases of analysis were completed for each City department studied: Cost of Service Analysis Fee Establishment Cost Recovery Evaluation Page 181 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 4 2.2.1 COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS This cost of service analysis is a quantitative effort that compiles the full cost of providing governmental services and activities. There are two primary types of costs considered: direct and indirect costs. Direct costs are those that specifically relate to an activity or service, including the real-time provision of the service. Indirect costs are those that support the provision of services in general but cannot be directly or easily assigned to a singular activity or service. Direct Costs:  Direct personnel costs – Salary, wages and benefits expenses for personnel specifically involved in the provision of services and activities to the public.  Direct non-personnel costs – Discrete expenses attributable to a specific service or activity performed, such as contractor costs, third-party charges, and materials used in the service or activity. Indirect Costs:  Indirect personnel costs – Personnel expenses supporting the provision of services and activities. This can include line supervision and departmental management, administrative support within a department, and staff involved in technical support activities related to the direct services provided to the public.  Indirect non-personnel costs – Expenses other than labor involved in the provision of services. In most cases, these costs are allocated across all services provided by a department, rather than directly assigned to individual fee/rate categories.  Overhead costs – These are expenses, both labor and non-labor, related to agency-wide support services. Support services include general administrative services such as City Manager, Finance, Human Resources, etc. The amount of costs attributable to the departments or divisions included in this Study were sourced from the City’s Cost Allocation Plan. All cost components in this Study use annual (or annualized) figures, representing a twelve-month cycle of expenses incurred by the Department in the provision of all services and activities City-wide. Nearly all the fees reviewed in this Study require specific actions on the part of City staff to provide the service or conduct the activity. Since labor is the primary underlying factor in these activities, the Study expresses the full cost of service as a fully burdened cost per labor hour. NBS calculated a composite, fully burdened, hourly rate for each department, division, program, or activity applicable to the specific organization and needs of each area studied. This rate serves as the basis for further quantifying the average full cost of providing individual services and activities. Determining the fully burdened labor rate for each department, and the various functional divisions within a department, requires two data sets: (1) the full costs of service, and (2) the number of staff hours available to perform those services. NBS derived the hours available based on the complete list of all City employees and/or available service hours of its contracted professionals (where applicable). Page 182 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 5 The City supplied NBS with the total number of paid labor hours for each employee involved in the delivery of services included in this Study. These available hours represent the amount of productive time available to provide both fee-recoverable and non-fee recoverable services and activities. Available labor hours divided into the annual full costs of service equal the composite, fully burdened, labor rate. Some agencies may also use the resulting rates for purposes other than setting fees, such as calculating the full cost of general services or structuring a cost recovery agreement with another agency or third party. NBS also assisted the City in estimating the staff time for the services and activities listed in the City’s fee schedule. Time tracking records for the fee programs studied as part of this analysis, when available, proved useful in identifying time spent providing general categories of service (e.g., division administration, plan review, inspection, public information assistance, etc.). However, the City does not systematically track the service time of activities for all departments or all individual fee-level services provided. Therefore, NBS also relied on interviews and questionnaires to develop the necessary data sets of estimated labor time. In many cases, the City provided estimates of the average amount of time (in minutes and hours) it took to complete a typical service or activity considered on a per-occurrence basis. It should be noted that the development of these time estimates was not a one-step process but required careful review by both NBS and department managers to assess the reasonableness of such estimates. Based on the results of this review, the City reconsidered its time estimates until all parties were comfortable that the fee models reasonably reflected the average service level provided by the City. Finally, the fully burdened labor rate(s) calculated in earlier steps were applied at the individual fee level time estimates, yielding an average total cost of providing each fee for service or activity. The graphic below provides a visual representation of the steps discussed in this section. Page 183 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 6 2.2.2 FEE ESTABLISHMENT The fee establishment process includes a range of considerations, including the following:  Addition to and deletion of fees – The Study provided each department with the opportunity to propose additions and deletions to their current fee schedules, as well as re-name, re-organize, and clarify which fees were to be imposed. Many of these fee revisions allowed for better adherence to current practices, as well as the improvement in the calculation, application, and collection of the fees owed by an individual. Some additions to the fee schedule were simply the identification of existing services or activities performed by City staff for which no fee is currently charged.  Revision to the structure of fees – In most cases, the focus was to re-align the fee amount to match the costs of service and leave the current structure of fees unchanged. However, in several cases, fee categories and fee names had to be simplified or re- structured to increase the likelihood of full cost recovery or to enhance the fairness of how the fee is applied to the various types of fee payers.  Documentation of the tools used to calculate special cost recovery – The City’s fee schedule should include the list of fully burdened rates developed by the Study. Documenting these rates in the fee schedule provides an opportunity for the City Council to approve rates for cost recovery under a “time and materials” approach. It also provides clear publication of those rates so that all fee payers can readily reference the basis of any fee amounts. The fee schedule should provide language that supports special Page 184 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 7 forms of cost recovery for activities and services not included in the adopted master fee schedule. In these rare instances, published rates are used to estimate a flat fee or bill on an hourly basis, which is at the department director’s discretion. 2.2.3 COST RECOVERY EVALUATION The NBS fee model compares the existing fee for each service or activity to the average total cost of service quantified through this analysis. Here are the possible outcomes of the fee analysis:  Cost recovery rate of 0% - This signifies that there is currently no current recovery of costs from fee revenues (or insufficient information available for evaluation).  Cost recovery rate of 100% - This means that the fee currently recovers the full cost of service.  Cost recovery rate between 0% and 100% - This indicates partial recovery of the full cost of service through fees.  Cost recovery rate greater than 100% - This means that the fee exceeds the full cost of service. User fees and regulatory fees should not exceed the full cost of service. In all cases, the cost recovery rate achieved by a fee should not be greater than 100%. In most cases, imposing a fee above this threshold could change the definition of the charge from a cost of service based fee to a tax which has other procedural requirements, such as ballot protest or voter approval. NBS assisted with modeling the “recommended” or “target” level of cost recovery for each fee, established at either 100% or any amount less than the calculated full cost of service. Targets and recommendations reflect discretion on the part of the agency based on a variety of factors, such as existing City policies and agency-wide or departmental revenue objectives, economic goals, community values, market conditions, level of demand, and others. A general method of selecting an appropriate cost recovery target is to consider the public and private benefits of the service or activity in question, such as:  To what degree does the public at large benefit from the service?  To what degree does the individual or entity requesting, requiring, or causing the service benefit? When a service or activity benefits the public at large, there is generally little to no recommended fee amount (i.e., 0% cost recovery), reinforcing the fact that a service which truly benefits the public is best funded by general resources of the City, such as revenues from the General Fund (e.g., taxes). Conversely, when a service or activity wholly benefits an individual or entity, the cost recovery is generally closer to or equal to 100% of cost recovery from fees collected from the individual or entity. In some cases, a strict public-versus-private benefit judgment may not be sufficient to finalize a cost recovery target. Any of the following factors and considerations may influence or supplement the public-versus-private benefit perception of a service or activity: Page 185 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 8  If optimizing revenue potential is an overriding goal, is it feasible to recover the full cost of service?  Will increasing fees result in non-compliance or public safety problems?  Are there desired behaviors or modifications to behaviors of the service population helped or hindered through the degree of pricing for the activities?  Does current demand for services support a fee increase without adverse impact to the community served or current revenue levels? In other words, would fee increases have the unintended consequence of driving away the population served?  Is there a good policy basis for differentiating between the type of user (e.g., residents vs. non-residents, residential vs. commercial, non-profit entities, and business entities)?  Are there broader City objectives that merit a less than full cost recovery target from fees, such as economic development goals and local social values? NBS provided the cost of service calculation based on 100% full cost recovery and the framework for the City’s use to adjust the amount of cost recovery in accordance with its broader goals as they pertain to code compliance, cost recovery, economic development, and social values. 2.2.4 COMPARATIVE FEE SURVEY Appendix B presents the results of the Comparative Fee Survey for the City. Policy makers often request a comparison of their jurisdictional fees to those of surrounding or similar communities. The purpose of a comparison is to provide a sense of the local market pricing for services, and to use that information to gauge the impact of recommendations for fee adjustments. In this effort, NBS worked with the City to choose five comparative agencies - Ontario, Fontana, Upland, Eastvale, and Chino. It is important to keep the following in mind when interpreting the general approach to, and use of, comparative survey data:  Comparative surveys do not provide information about cost recovery policies or procedures inherent in each comparison agency.  A “market-based” decision to price services below the full cost of service calculation is the same as deciding to subsidize that service.  Comparative agencies may or may not base their fee amounts on the estimated and reasonable cost of providing services. NBS did not perform the same level of analysis of the comparative agencies’ fees.  The results of comparative fee surveys are often non-conclusive for many fee categories.  Comparison agencies typically use varied terminology for the provision of similar services. NBS made every reasonable attempt to source each comparison agency’s fee schedule from their respective websites and compile a comparison of fee categories and amounts for the most readily comparable fee items that match the City’s existing fee structure. Page 186 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 9 2.2.5 DATA SOURCES The following data sources were used to support the cost of service analysis and fee establishment phases of this Study:  The City’s Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024  A complete list of all City personnel, salary/wage rates, regular hours, paid benefits, and paid leave amounts provided by the Finance Department.  Various correspondences with City staff supporting the adopted budgets and current fees, including budget notes and expenditure detail not shown in the published document.  Prevailing fee schedules as adopted by City Council  Annual workload data provided by each department and/or fee program evaluated in the Study. The City’s adopted budget serves as an important source of information that affects the cost of service results. NBS did not audit or validate the City’s financial documents and budget practices, nor was the cost information adjusted to reflect different levels of service or any specific, targeted performance benchmarks. This Study accepts the City’s budget as a legislatively adopted directive describing the most appropriate and reasonable level of City spending. NBS consultants accept the City Council’s deliberative process and the City’s budget plan and further assert that through this legislative process, the City has yielded a reasonable and valid expenditure plan to use in setting cost- based fees. Page 187 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE PROGRAM The Planning Department is tasked with ensuring land uses in Rancho Cucamonga comply with City codes, the General Plan, City Council and Planning Commission policies, and State law requirements. Approval of projects through the planning process is often required prior to issuing building permits. The Planning Department handles environmental review of public and private projects. Advanced planning programs provided by the department include a comprehensive General Plan update, preparing and amending specific plans, and conducting special land use studies as directed by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3.1 Cost of Service Analysis NBS calculated the total estimated annual cost of services provided by the Planning Department, segregated between costs for activities that are eligible and/or targeted for recovery in fees for service and those that require another funding source other than fees. Table 2 shows the estimated full cost of providing services on an annual basis and the fully burdened cost per hour developed for cost recovery purposes through fees for services. Table 2. Fully Burdened Hourly Rate – Planning Department As Table 2 above shows, the total cost of providing services is approximately $2.9 million per year. However, the results of the cost of service analysis identified $1.7 million in cost for recovery from the City’s fees for service with the remaining $1.2 million recommended for recovery through other funding sources. All subsequent cost of service calculations at the individual fee level assumes a fully burdened hourly rate of $224. Based on interviews with Department staff, the analysis segregated the total cost of services into four primary services categories: (1) Public Counter Duty / General Info; (2) Advanced / Long-Range Planning Activities; (3) Non-Fee Support to Other City Departments; and (4) Current Planning Direct Services. In order to clarify the underlying costs and assumptions used to calculate the fully burdened hourly rate, here is a summary of the descriptions for each cost category: Cost Element N o t e s Public Counter Duty / General Info Advance / Long Range Planning Non-Fee Support To Other City Departments Current Planning - Direct Services Total Labor 140,618$ 231,908$ 186,748$ 621,880$ 1,181,154$ Recurring Non-Labor 4,606 7,596 6,117 20,371 38,690 Citywide Overhead 59,259 97,731 78,699 262,072 497,761 Department Admin 136,818 225,642 181,701 605,077 1,149,238 Division Total 341,301$ 562,877$ 453,265$ 1,509,400$ 2,866,843$ Cost Recovery Targeted from Fees 50%0%0%100%59% Amount Targeted for Consideration in Billings/Fees 170,650 - - 1,509,400 1,680,050 Amount Requiring Another Funding Source 170,650 562,877 453,265 - 1,186,792 Fully Burdened Hourly Rate $ 23 $ - $ - $ 201 $ 224 7,495 Reference: Direct Hours Only Page 188 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 11  Public Counter Duty / General Info – Activities associated with responding to phone calls and general information requests that support the development review process. Typically, some portions of costs for provision of general public information and assistance do not apply toward recovery from fees and are considered a basic function of governmental services to the public. Planning staff estimated that approximately 50% of these costs support land use application review activities, while the remaining costs should not be considered in the calculation of fees for services.  Advance / Long Range Planning – Advanced planning programs provided by the department include a cyclical and comprehensive General Plan update, preparing and amending specific plans, and conducting special land use studies as directed by the Planning Commission and City Council. These costs are not considered for recovery from Planning fees but are commonly recovered partially through a separate “Long Range Planning” or “General Plan Maintenance” surcharge on top of relevant planning and building permits in other California cities. NBS has calculated a separate surcharge for recovery of these costs as part of this Study, discussed in Section 5 of this report.  Non-Fee Support to Other City Departments – Staff in the Planning department support other City departments on various non-fee related initiatives such as community improvement projects. These costs are not recommended for recovery from Planning fees.  Current Planning Direct Services – Development review and approval comprises the majority of this Department’s work efforts. 100% of these costs apply toward recovery from the Department’s routine types of fees for service. The fully burdened hourly rate involves significant analytical and policy-related decisions regarding the inclusion of categorized activity costs. The decision to either include or exclude certain costs toward recovery in fees for service stems from the basic fee setting parameters set forth by industry standard fee calculation methods and the California State Constitution. State statutes require that any new fee that is levied or any existing fee that is increased should not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the service for which the charge is levied. 3.2 Fee Establishment The list of fees as shown in Appendix A.1 to this report reflects some minor changes to the City’s prior fee schedule. Highlights include:  Fees that were redundant or unused were deleted such as: Government Referral, City Facilitation of Consultant, Large Day Care Permit, Pre Application Review – Planning Commission, and Preliminary Review.  Fees names for the following fees were updated to clarify its use: Design Review was updated to Major Design Review, City Administrative Processing Fee-Facilitation of Consultant was updated to City Administrative Processing Fee, and Other Environmental Review IS/ND/MND (Non-EIR) was updated to Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR). Page 189 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 12  To update fee structures to be clearer and more precise, added new sub-categories for the following fees: Development/Density Bonus Agreement, Development/Density Bonus Agreement – Modification, Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR), Technical Report Review.  New fee categories were added for Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee, Public Noticing, SB 330 Preliminary Application Fee, and Process fee for tree removed with no permit. In addition to these changes, the Study’s efforts focused on review and refinement of the Department’s tools to calculate special cost recovery. The proposed fee schedule distinguishes between projects recommended by the Department as flat/fixed fee amounts, versus projects requiring an initial deposit and hourly billing basis for cost recovery Section 2, Methods of Analysis, provides additional discussion on the Study’s approach to adding, deleting, and revising fee categories. 3.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation Appendix A.1 presents the results of the detailed cost recovery analysis of fees for the City’s Planning Department. In the Appendix, the “Cost of Service per Activity” column establishes the maximum adoptable fee amount for the corresponding service identified in the “Fee Name” list. This Cost of Service per Activity is reflective of the Department’s total estimate cost for review of each entitlement/ permit, as well as any supporting department/division’s review as required by the City’s established development review processes. Currently, the Department is recovering approximately 70% of the total cost of providing services from fees. As Table shows, the City collects approximately $851,000 per year in revenue at the current fee amounts. At full cost recovery and the same demand level for these services, the City would recover approximately $1.2 million. Table 3. Cost Recovery Outcomes NBS provided a full cost of service evaluation and the framework for considering fees, while the City departments determined the appropriate cost recovery levels at or below full cost amounts. The “Recommended Fee / Deposit Level” column in Appendix A.1 displays the City staff’s initial recommended fee amounts. Based on this information, the staff recommends that all fees recover 100% of the costs of providing services. These initial recommendations for adjusted fee amounts are projected to recover approximately 100% of the total costs of providing fee-related services, assuming the demand for services remains the same. Department / Division Estimated Annual Current Fee Revenue Estimated Annual Full Cost Recovery Fee Revenue Annual Cost Recovery Surplus / (Deficit) Current Cost Recovery % Estimated Annual Recommended Fee Revenue Recommended Cost Recovery % Planning Department $ 850,758 $ 1,218,263 $ (367,505)69.8% $ 1,218,263 100.0% Page 190 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 13 3.4 Comparison Survey As discussed in section 2.2.4, Comparative Fee Survey, NBS compared the City’s current list of fees to those of 5 comparison agencies selected by the City. While the results of comparative fee surveys are often non-conclusive for many fee categories due to comparison agencies typically using varied terminology for the provision of similar services, NBS made every reasonable attempt to source each comparison agency’s fee schedule. The results of the comparison are presented in Appendix B.1 to this report. Page 191 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 14 BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICE FEES The Building and Safety Department’s is responsible for ensuring that structures adhere to minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property and the public welfare. This is accomplished through building plan review, issuance of building permits and inspection of buildings to ensure compliance with local and state laws. Building and Safety also performs certain fire reviews and inspections on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD). 4.1 Cost of Service Analysis NBS calculated the total estimated annual cost of services provided by the Building and Safety Department, segregated by those costs that are eligible and/or targeted for recovery in fees for service and those that require another funding source other than fees. The costs recoverable through fees were also translated into a fully burdened hourly rate for the purposes of individual fee calculations. Table summarizes the outcomes of the analysis: Table 4. Fully Burdened Hourly Rate – Building & Safety Services Department As Table 4 above shows, the total cost of providing services is approximately $3.4 million per year. However, the results of the cost of service analysis identified $3.2 million in cost for recovery from the City’s fees for service with the remaining $180,000 recommended for recovery through funding sources other than fees. All subsequent cost of service calculations at the individual fee level assume a fully burdened hourly rate of $152. Based on interviews with Department staff, the analysis segregated the total cost of services into four primary services categories: (1) Public Counter and General Information; (2) Building Code Enforcement; and (3) Direct Services (Processing, Plan Check, Inspection. In order to clarify the underlying costs and assumptions used to calculate the fully burdened hourly rate, here is a summary of the descriptions for each cost category:  Public Counter and General Information –Staff time devoted to responding to phone calls and public inquiries not specifically associated with an active permit. Typically, some portion of costs for provision of general public information and assistance are not linked Cost Element N o t e s Public Counter/ General Info Building Code Enforcement Building Direct Services - Processing Building Direct Services - PC Building Direct Services - INSP Total Labor 215,172$ 76,945$ 329,247$ 429,425$ 688,956$ 1,739,743$ Recurring Non-Labor 2,599 929 3,977 177,187 8,323 193,016 Citywide Overhead 65,524 23,431 100,262 130,768 209,800 529,784 Building Division Admin 109,635 39,205 167,758 285,365 351,038 953,002 Division Total 392,930$ 140,510$ 601,244$ 1,022,745$ 1,258,116$ 3,415,545$ Cost Recovery Targeted from Fees 90% 0% 100% 100% 100%95% Amount Targeted for Consideration in Billings/Fees 353,637 - 601,244 1,022,745 1,258,116 3,235,742 Amount Requiring Another Funding Source 39,293 140,510 - - - 179,803 Fully Burdened Hourly Rate $ 17 $ - $ 28 $ 48 $ 59 $ 152 21,327 Reference: Direct Hours Only Page 192 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 15 to recovery from fees for building permit applications. Building staff estimates approximately 90% of this activity supports building plan review and inspection activities, while 10% of the remaining costs should not be considered fee recoverable.  Building Code Enforcement – Work activities in response to a complaint received by the Building Department related to violation of a prior condition of approval, City Ordinance or State law. Includes complaint investigation, follow up, and any associated abatement or enforcement actions. None of these costs are recommended for recovery in the City’s user and regulatory fees for service.  Direct Services (Processing, Plan Check, Inspection) - Work activities associated with an active building permit application. 100% of these costs are recoverable in Building user and regulatory fees for service. The fully burdened hourly rate involves significant analytical and policy-related decisions regarding the inclusion of categorized activity costs. The decision to either include or exclude certain costs toward recovery in fees for service stems from the basic fee setting parameters set forth by industry standard fee calculation methods and the California State Constitution. State statutes require that any new fee that is levied or any existing fee that is increased should not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the service for which the charge is levied. 4.2 Fee Establishment The list of fees as shown in Appendix A.1 to this report reflects some minor changes to the City’s prior fee schedule. Highlights include:  Fees that were redundant or unused were deleted such as: Patio Covers pre-engineered fees, Utility Release processing fee, Scanning Fees, Outsourced Plan Check, and Residential Solar Power Storage System fees.  Updates to the following fee names and fee structures to be clearer and more precise were made: S1 Mini Storage, R3.1 Change of Occupancy (Build-Out Only) to R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build-Out Only), R4, Wall Opening (windows/doors) new altered, and Utility Release (Utility Connection), Cell Site modification, Retaining Wall over 6’ high, and Solar/photovoltaic up to 15Kw – Residential.  New fee categories were added: S1 Parking Garages (open or closed) above 50,000 square feet, Defensible Space Review, Roof Repair up to 400 sq.ft., and Public Art - Structural Review. In addition to these changes, the Study’s efforts focused on review and refinement of the Department’s tools to calculate special cost recovery. The proposed fee schedule distinguishes between projects recommended by the Department as flat/fixed fee amounts, versus projects requiring an initial deposit and hourly billing basis for cost recovery. Section 2, Methods of Analysis, provides additional discussion on the Study’s approach to adding, deleting, and revising fee categories. Page 193 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 16 4.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation Appendices A.2 and A.3 present the results of the detailed cost recovery analysis of fees for the City’s Building and Safety Services Department. In the Appendix, the “Cost of Service per Activity” column establishes the maximum adoptable fee amount for the corresponding service identified in the “Fee Name” list. This Cost of Service per Activity is reflective of the Building and Safety Department’s total estimated cost for review of each plan/permit, as well as any supporting department/division review as required by the City’s established development review processes. Currently, the Department is recovering approximately 93% of the total cost of providing services from fees. As Table shows, the City collects approximately $3.6 million per year in revenue at the current fee amounts. At full cost recovery and the same demand level for these services, the City would recover approximately $3.9 million. Table 5. Cost Recovery Outcomes NBS provided a full cost of service evaluation and the framework for considering fees, while the City departments determined the appropriate cost recovery levels at or below full cost amounts. The “Recommended Fee Level/Deposit” column in Appendices A.2 and A.3 display City staff’s initially recommended fee amounts. Staff recommends all fees to recover 100% of the costs of providing services except for the following miscellaneous permits, in order to keep those affordable and encourage public safety for Rancho Cucamonga residents:  Tent/Awnings  Wall opening (windows/doors) new/altered  Block wall 3-6 ft high - 1st 100 linear ft.  Fence (wood, wrought iron, chain link) over 6' high  Interior remodel (residential)  Siding, stucco, brick, or stone veneer  Solar/photovoltaic - 0-250 kw Commercial  Insulation / drywall  Cabana - outdoor living area with walls  Carports  Exhaust hood, vent fan, ventilation system, Heating unit, compressor, or Evaporative cooler Residential /commercial each These initial recommendations for adjusted fee amounts are still projected to recover approximately 99.6% of the total costs of providing fee-related services, assuming the demand for services remains the same. Department / Division Estimated Annual Current Fee Revenue Estimated Annual Full Cost Recovery Fee Revenue Annual Cost Recovery Surplus / (Deficit) Current Cost Recovery % Estimated Annual Recommended Fee Revenue Recommended Cost Recovery % Building & Safety Department $ 3,325,892 $ 3,480,607 $ (154,714) 95.6% $ 3,466,754 99.6% Building - Fire Fees 280,529 393,321 (112,792)71.3% 393,321 100.0% Total $ 3,606,421 $ 3,873,928 $ (267,506)93.1% $ 3,860,075 99.6% Page 194 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 17 4.4 Comparison Survey As discussed in section 2.2.4, Comparative Fee Survey, NBS compared the City’s current list of fees to those of 5 comparison agencies selected by the City. While the results of comparative fee surveys are often non-conclusive for many fee categories due to comparison agencies typically using varied terminology for the provision of similar services, NBS made every reasonable attempt to source each comparison agency’s fee schedule. The results of the comparison are presented in Appendix B.2 to this report. Page 195 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 18 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE SURCHARGE The City of Rancho Cucamonga updates its General Plan on a routine basis. This Plan helps to guide the growth of the community in a consistent manner. Government Code 66014 (b) allows local agencies to, “…include the costs reasonably necessary to prepare and revise the plans and policies that a local agency is required to adopt before it can make any necessary findings and determinations”. This section of the Government Code supports inclusion of general plan maintenance and update costs in fees for service. 5.1 Cost of Service Analysis As shown in Table below, the City would need to collect approximately $409,000 per year in funding for the purpose of updating and maintaining the General Plan. Table 6. Annual General Plan Update Costs This is based on the City’s estimate of $2.5 million in contract costs required to update the General Plan every 10 years, plus 50% of the estimated costs of Advance / Long Range Planning staff support quantified in Section 4 of this report. Also, the City currently charges a General Plan Maintenance Fee and has accrued a fund balance, which is also shown as an offset to the contractor cost requirements included in the fee calculation. 5.2 Fee Establishment The City currently collects a 10% General Plan Maintenance Fee, applicable to specific planning applications and building permit types. In general, the Fee applies to projects that either impact or are subject to policies in the General Plan. The City and consultants reviewed the proposed list of development user fees and determined the following Planning Department and Building and Safety Department fee items are eligible for the surcharge: Cost Total Cost Amortization Period (Yrs) Annual Cost Contractor Cost 2,480,215$ 10 248,021$ Advance / Long Range Planning Staff Support (50%)281,438 1 281,438 Subtotal $ 2,761,653 $ 529,460 Fund Balance 6/30/23 (1,208,635)10 (120,863) Total $ 1,553,018 $ 408,596 Page 196 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 19 Table 7. List of Fees Eligible for Surcharge Adult Entertainment Permit Planning Department Hourly Rate Annexation Similar Use Determination Appeal of a Planning Commission decision Site Development Review Appeal of Planning Director decision Specific Plan - New Certificate of Appropriateness Specific Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit Master Plan - New Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification Master Plan Amendment Development Agreement Street Name Change Development Agreement - Modification Tentative Parcel Map Density Bonus Agreement Tentative Parcel Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) Density Bonus Agreement- Modification Tentative Tract Map Development Code Amendment Tentative Tract Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) Entertainment Permit Third and subsequent submittal review Entertainment Permit - Modification Time Extension Entertainment Permit- Annual Renewal Trail Easement Vacation Environmental/CEQA Review - Exemption Transfer of Development Rights Environmental Impact Report Tree Removal Permits Other Environmental Review IS/ND/MND (Non-EIR) Variance General Plan Amendment Zoning Map Amendment Hillside Design Review General Plan Maintenance Fee Landmark Application Technology Fee Major Design Review On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign Major Design Review - Modification Off-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign Minor Design Review Notice of Filing Sign (per sign) Minor Design Review - Modification Temporary Use Permit Model Home Restoration Deposit Minor Exception Building permit and plan check for all new construction and tenant improvements.Barn/Storage sheds Residential and Commercial Processing fees that required routing to other departments.Light Standards Antennas Mobile Homes New Cell Towers w/ equipment shelter Temporary Building/Trailers Cell Site Modification Signs Tent/Awnings Re-roofing Balcony/Decks Roof Framing Demolitions Room Addition Block Walls Siding Masonry Pilasters Solar/Photovoltaic Fences Residential/Commercial Solar Power Storage System Flagpoles Cabanas Garages Above Ground Tanks Patio Covers Carports Patio Enclosures Exhaust Hoods Septic pre-inspections Dust Collection Systems Relocate Buildings Cooling Tower or Heat Exchange Retaining Walls Outdoor Events – Carnival Rides, Electric Generators Table 7. List of Fees Eligible for Surcharge Planning Department Building & Safety Department Page 197 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 20 The recommended fee revenue for relevant fee types subject to this Surcharge is approximately $2.6 million. The following table provides options for surcharge amounts based on various cost recovery targets: Table 8. General Plan Implementation Fee Calculation Each jurisdiction’s policy makers must decide to what degree new development impacts the revision and maintenance efforts to their Plan. For jurisdictions with large amounts of undeveloped land available, the impact is typically considered higher than for jurisdictions that are closer to “build-out” of available land resources. This surcharge should apply to projects with the largest relative impact on the maintenance, update, and use of the City’s General Plan. 5.3 Cost Recovery Evaluation The City’s existing General Plan Maintenance Fee recovers approximately 92% of the Department’s cost of providing services. As shown in the following table, the City collects approximately $376,000 per year in revenues at current fee amounts. At full cost recovery, the same demand for these services would generate approximately $409,000. Table 9. Cost Recovery Outcomes Upon reviewing this information and options for establishing this surcharge, City staff recommends continuing to charge the current 10% fee. If adopted, the fee could generate approximately $257,000 per year. The remaining unfunded amount would be subsidized by other City revenue sources such as the general fund. This is appropriate considering there is a broader community benefit received from the Plan, as well as use of the Plan by other non-development services departments such as public safety and utilities. Cost Recovery Target Annual Cost @ Target % of Recommended Fee Revenue 100% $ 408,596 15.9% 75% $ 306,447 11.9% 50% $ 204,298 8.0% 25% $ 102,149 4.0% Department / Division Estimated Annual Current Fee Revenue Estimated Annual Full Cost Recovery Fee Revenue Annual Cost Recovery Surplus / (Deficit) Current Cost Recovery % Estimated Annual Recommended Fee Revenue Recommended Cost Recovery % General Plan Maintenance Surcharge $ 376,284 $ 408,596 $ (408,596) 92.1% $ 256,820 62.9% Page 198 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 21 CONCLUSION Based on the Cost-of-Service Analysis, Cost Recovery Evaluation, and Proposed Fee phases of analysis in this Study, the proposed master schedule of fees formatted for implementation has been prepared and included in the City’s accompanying staff report. As discussed throughout this report, the proposed fee schedule includes fee increases intended to greatly improve the City’s recovery of costs incurred to provide individual services, as well as to adjust fees downward where fees charge exceed the average costs incurred. Predicting the amount to which any adopted fee increases will affect Department revenues is difficult to quantify. For the near-term, the City should not count on increased revenues to meet any specific expenditure plan. Experience with these fee increases should be gained first before revenue projections are revised. However, unless there is some significant, long-term change in activity levels at the City, proposed fee amendments should – over time – enhance the City’s revenue capabilities, providing it the ability to stretch other resources further for the benefit of the public at large. The City’s Master Fee Schedule should become a living document but handled with care:  A fundamental purpose of the fee schedule is to provide clarity and transparency to the public and to staff regarding fees imposed by the City. Once adopted by the Council, the fee schedule is the final word on the amount and manner in which fees should be imposed by the departments. Old fee schedules should be superseded by the new master document. If the master document is found to be missing fees, those fees need eventually to be added to the master schedule and should not continue to exist outside the consolidated, master framework.  NBS recommends the City adjust fees on an annual basis to keep pace at least with cost inflation. The City’s historical approach has been to apply the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees – Total Compensation. In NBS’ opinion, the City’s approach is in line with industry standards and could be continued. Conducting a comprehensive user fee Study is not an annual requirement; it becomes worthwhile only over time as significant shifts in organization, local practices, legislative values, or legal requirements change. In NBS’ experience, a comprehensive analysis such as this should be performed every three to five years. It should be noted that when an automatic adjustment is applied annually, the City is free to use its discretion in applying the adjustment; not all fees need to be adjusted, especially when there are good policy reasons for an alternate course. The full cost of service is the City’s only limit in setting its fees. As a final note in this Study, it is worth acknowledging the path that fees in general have taken in California. The public demands ever more precise and equitable accounting of the basis for governmental fees and a greater say in when and how they are imposed. It is inevitable in the not-too-distant future that user fees and regulatory fees will demand an even greater level of analysis and supporting data to meet the public’s evolving expectations. Technology systems will play an increased and significant role in an agency’s ability to accomplish this. Continuous improvement and refinement of time tracking abilities will greatly enhance the City’s ability to set fees for service and identify unfunded activities in years to come. Page 199 City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Fee Study – Planning & Building and Safety Services Departments 22 In preparing this report and the opinions and recommendations included herein, NBS has relied on a number of principal assumptions and considerations with regard to financial matters, conditions and events that may occur in the future. This information and assumptions, including the City’s budgets, time estimate data, and workload information from City staff, were provided by sources we believe to be reliable; however, NBS has not independently verified such information and assumptions. While we believe NBS’ use of such information and assumptions is reasonable for the purpose of this report, some assumptions will invariably not materialize as stated herein and may vary significantly due to unanticipated events and circumstances. Therefore, the actual results can be expected to vary from those projected to the extent that actual future conditions differ from those assumed by us or provided to us by others. Disclaimer: In preparing this report and the opinions and recommendations included herein, NBS has relied on a number of principal assumptions and considerations with regard to financial matters, conditions and events that may occur in the future. This information and assumptions, including the City’s budgets, time estimate data, and workload information from City staff, were provided by sources we believe to be reliable; however, NBS has not independently verified such information and assumptions. While we believe NBS’ use of such information and assumptions is reasonable for the purpose of this report, some assumptions will invariably not materialize as stated herein and may vary significantly due to unanticipated events and circumstances. Therefore, the actual results can be expected to vary from those projected to the extent that actual future conditions differ from those assumed by us or provided to us by others. Page 200 Prepared by NBS for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX A.1 Cost of Service Analysis – Planning Department Page 201 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES [*] 1 Additional Hearing Required PER HEARING [4]12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 2,690$ $ 2,461 91% $ 2,690 100%- -$ -$ -$ 2 Adult Entertainment Permit DEPOSIT [5]90.00 0.00 0.20 2.00 10.00 40.00 142.20 26,378$ $ 10,000 38% $ 26,378 100%- -$ -$ -$ 3 Annexation DEPOSIT [5]337.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 20.00 15.00 402.00 84,461$ $ 15,000 18% $ 84,461 100%- -$ -$ -$ 4 Appeal of a Planning Commission decision FLAT 89.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.00 21,826$ $ 3,014 14% $ 21,826 100%2 6,028$ 43,652$ 43,652$ 5 Appeal of Planning Director decision FLAT 40.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 9,592$ $ 1,584 17% $ 9,592 100%2 3,168$ 19,183$ 19,183$ 6 Business License Review FLAT [4]0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 90$ $ 82 91% $ 90 100%712 58,384$ 63,843$ 63,843$ 7 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee PER DEVELOPM ENT [4]2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 448$ NEW % $ 448 100%- -$ -$ -$ 8 Certificate of Appropriateness Residential FLAT 35.00 0.30 0.20 2.40 0.00 0.00 37.90 8,265$ $ 2,644 32% $ 8,265 100%- -$ -$ -$ All Others FLAT 35.00 0.30 0.20 2.40 0.00 0.00 37.90 8,265$ $ 7,599 92% $ 8,265 100%- -$ -$ -$ 9 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit Administrative Approval FLAT [1]23.40 0.50 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 26.10 5,629$ $ 4,316 77% $ 5,629 100%11 47,476$ 61,919$ 61,919$ PC Approval FLAT 43.60 0.50 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 46.30 10,157$ $ 7,629 75% $ 10,157 100%2 15,258$ 20,314$ 20,314$ CC Approval FLAT 43.60 0.50 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 46.30 10,157$ $ 9,612 95% $ 10,157 100%1 9,612$ 10,157$ 10,157$ 10 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification Administrative Approval FLAT 11.70 0.50 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.40 2,855$ 50% of the original fee % $ 2,855 100%7 -$ 19,982$ 19,982$ PC Approval FLAT 21.80 0.50 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 23.50 5,119$ $ 3,936 77% $ 5,119 100%1 3,936$ 5,119$ 5,119$ CC Approval FLAT 21.80 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 22.80 5,039$ $ 5,919 117% $ 5,039 100%-$ -$ -$ 11 County Recording Fee FLAT [4] [8] Actual Cost Actual Cost 12 Courtesy Review FLAT [4]8.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 10.50 2,167$ $ 1,601 74% $ 2,167 100%13 20,813$ 28,175$ 28,175$ 13 Development Agreement DEPOSIT [5]275.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 380.00 75,171$ $ 50,000 67% $ 75,171 100%- -$ -$ -$ 14 Development Agreement - Modification DEPOSIT [5]105.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 29,162$ $ 25,000 86% $ 29,162 100%- -$ -$ -$ 15 Density Bonus Agreement DEPOSIT [5]275.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 380.00 75,171$ $ 10,000 13% $ 75,171 100%- -$ -$ -$ 16 Density Bonus Agreement- Modification DEPOSIT [5]105.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 29,162$ $ 25,000 86% $ 29,162 100%- -$ -$ -$ 17 Development Code Amendment DEPOSIT [5]81.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 83.00 18,567$ $ 10,000 54% $ 18,567 100%- -$ -$ -$ 18 ENHCP Specific Plan Recovery Fee [4] Neighborhood Area Residential (per unit)FLAT [6] [8] $ 1,246 $ 1,246 Rural Conservation Area Residential (per unit)FLAT [6] [8] $ 2,166 $ 2,166 Commercial/Other non-residential (per sq. ft.)FLAT [6] [8] $ 0.31 $ 0.31 19 Entertainment Permit Administrative Approval FLAT 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 29.00 6,424$ $ 4,316 67% $ 6,424 100%- -$ -$ -$ PC Approval FLAT 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 44.00 9,787$ $ 8,603 88% $ 9,787 100%- -$ -$ -$ 20 Entertainment Permit - Modification Administrative Approval FLAT 12.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 2,802$ $ 2,159 77% $ 2,802 100%- -$ -$ -$ PC Approval FLAT 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 4,483$ $ 4,298 96% $ 4,483 100%- -$ -$ -$ 21 Entertainment Permit- Annual Renewal FLAT 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 5.00 17.00 3,131$ $ 638 20% $ 3,131 100%9 5,742$ 28,176$ 28,176$ 22 Environmental/CEQA Review - Exemption FLAT 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 112$ $ 103 92% $ 112 100%63 6,489$ 7,061$ 7,061$ Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 1 of 6Page 202 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity 23 Environmental Impact Report City Administrative Processing DEPOSIT [5]376.50 60.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 456.50 95,999$ $ 45,000 47% $ 95,999 100%- -$ -$ -$ Consultant Cost DEPOSIT [8] Actual Cost Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] [8] Actual Cost Actual Cost 24 Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR) Consultant Cost DEPOSIT [8] Actual Cost Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] [8] Actual Cost Actual Cost 25 Film Permit FLAT [4]4.00 0.70 0.30 0.10 0.30 0.30 5.70 1,116$ $ 348 31% $ 1,116 100%8 2,784$ 8,928$ 8,928$ 26 General Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5]114.25 5.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 121.25 26,646$ $ 25,000 94% $ 26,646 100%- -$ -$ -$ 27 Hillside Design Review 1 Unit FLAT 35.00 13.00 0.40 1.70 6.00 0.00 56.10 10,994$ $ 9,242 84% $ 10,994 100%9 83,178$ 98,946$ 98,946$ 2 - 4 Units DEPOSIT [5]60.00 13.00 1.00 2.20 20.00 0.00 96.20 19,597$ $ 12,000 61% $ 19,597 100%- -$ -$ -$ 5+ Units DEPOSIT [5]105.50 40.00 2.00 4.20 20.00 0.00 171.70 33,563$ $ 20,000 60% $ 33,563 100%- -$ -$ -$ 28 Home Occupation Permit FLAT [4]0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 112$ $ 103 92% $ 112 100%- -$ -$ -$ 29 Land Use Verification Report FLAT [4]4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 897$ $ 821 92% $ 897 100%21 17,241$ 18,830$ 18,830$ 30 Landmark Application FLAT 41.00 1.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.20 9,333$ No Charge % $ 9,333 100%- -$ -$ -$ 31 Landscape Plan Review - New Development Reviewed by City Staff FLAT [4]5.60 0.50 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 9.10 1,773$ $ 1,663 94% $ 1,773 100%8 13,304$ 14,184$ 14,184$ City Administrative Processing Fee - Facilitation of Consultant FLAT [4]1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 392$ $ 358 91% $ 392 100%- -$ -$ -$ Consultant Cost FLAT [4]n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Actual Cost % $ - %- -$ -$ -$ 32 Major Design Review Single Family Residential 5 - 10 Units FLAT 65.80 22.00 0.80 1.70 2.00 0.00 92.30 18,238$ $ 16,411 90% $ 18,238 100%1 16,411$ 18,238$ 18,238$ 11 - 25 Units FLAT 90.50 22.00 1.20 2.20 2.00 0.00 117.90 23,886$ $ 21,669 91% $ 23,886 100%1 21,669$ 23,886$ 23,886$ 26+ Units FLAT 125.00 38.50 1.80 2.70 2.00 0.00 170.00 33,811$ $ 30,696 91% $ 33,811 100%- -$ -$ -$ Multi-Family Residential 2- 10 Units FLAT 65.80 22.00 0.80 2.20 4.00 0.00 94.80 18,724$ $ 16,564 88% $ 18,724 100%- -$ -$ -$ 11 - 75 Units FLAT 92.50 22.00 1.00 2.70 4.00 0.00 122.20 24,803$ $ 22,211 90% $ 24,803 100%1 22,211$ 24,803$ 24,803$ 76+ Units FLAT 134.00 38.50 1.50 4.20 4.00 0.00 182.20 36,440$ $ 32,968 90% $ 36,440 100%1 32,968$ 36,440$ 36,440$ Commercial Uses 0 - 50,000 Square Feet FLAT 63.00 22.00 0.50 2.20 4.00 0.00 91.70 18,070$ $ 15,958 88% $ 18,070 100%2 31,916$ 36,141$ 36,141$ 50,001 - 150,000 Square Feet FLAT 88.00 27.50 1.00 3.20 4.00 0.00 123.70 24,558$ $ 22,021 90% $ 24,558 100%- -$ -$ -$ 150,001+ Square Feet FLAT 135.00 44.00 1.80 4.20 4.00 0.00 189.00 37,378$ $ 33,783 90% $ 37,378 100%- -$ -$ -$ Industrial Zones 0 - 150,000 Square Feet FLAT 60.40 22.00 0.50 2.20 4.00 0.00 89.10 17,487$ $ 15,426 88% $ 17,487 100%- -$ -$ -$ 150,001 - 300,000 Square Feet FLAT 80.40 22.00 1.50 3.20 4.00 0.00 111.10 22,210$ $ 19,934 90% $ 22,210 100%- -$ -$ -$ 300,001+ Square Feet FLAT 102.40 33.00 2.40 4.20 4.00 0.00 146.00 28,748$ $ 26,001 90% $ 28,748 100%- -$ -$ -$ Mixed Use Zones FLAT 180.00 33.00 1.80 7.70 4.00 0.00 226.50 46,622$ $ 33,783 72% $ 46,622 100%4 135,132$ 186,486$ 186,486$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 2 of 6Page 203 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity 33 Major Design Review - Modification FLAT [1]% Administrative Approval FLAT 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 $ 1,793 50% of original application % $ 1,793 100% - $ - $ - $ - PC Approval FLAT 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 $ 2,690 50% of original application % $ 2,690 100% - $ - $ - $ - CC Approval FLAT 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 $ 3,362 50% of original application % $ 3,362 100% - $ - $ - $ - 34 Massage Business Permit FLAT [4]15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 4.00 20.00 3,951$ $ 3,649 92% $ 3,951 100%4 14,596$ 15,803$ 15,803$ 35 Massage Business Permit – Ancillary FLAT [4]9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 4.00 14.00 2,606$ $ 1,209 46% $ 2,606 100%- -$ -$ -$ 36 Massage Business Permit – Annual Renewal FLAT [4]3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 3.00 6.50 $ 1,062 $ 638 60% $ 1,062 100% 1 $ 638 $ 1,062 $ 1,062 37 Mills Act Application FLAT [4]26.60 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.80 5,980$ No Charge % $ 5,980 100%- -$ -$ -$ 38 Minor Design Review Residential FLAT 20.00 10.00 0.20 1.90 4.00 0.00 36.10 6,859$ $ 3,637 53% $ 6,859 100%7 25,459$ 48,014$ 48,014$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT 37.50 5.00 0.20 2.40 4.00 0.00 49.10 10,233$ $ 5,642 55% $ 10,233 100%11 62,062$ 112,563$ 112,563$ 39 Minor Design Review - Modification Residential FLAT 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 12.00 2,652$ $ 1,742 66% $ 2,652 100%- -$ -$ -$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT 16.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 18.50 4,109$ $ 2,903 71% $ 4,109 100%1 2,903$ 4,109$ 4,109$ 40 Minor Exception Administrative Approval - Resident FLAT 15.60 0.00 0.20 2.40 0.20 0.00 18.40 3,920$ $ 871 22% $ 3,920 100%1 871$ 3,920$ 3,920$ Administrative Approval - All Other FLAT 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.60 3,497$ $ 2,888 83% $ 3,497 100%- -$ -$ -$ PC Approval FLAT 26.40 0.00 0.20 2.40 0.20 0.00 29.20 6,341$ $ 4,660 73% $ 6,341 100%1 4,660$ 6,341$ 6,341$ 41 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program FLAT [4]5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1,121$ $ 1,025 91% $ 1,121 100%- -$ -$ -$ 42 Planning Department Hourly Rate HOURLY 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 224$ $ 204 91% $ 224 100%- -$ -$ -$ 43 Property Ownership List [4] 100 feet or less (small application)FLAT 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 22$ No Charge % $ 22 100%- -$ -$ -$ 101-660 feet (standard)FLAT 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 45$ $ 96 214% $ 45 100%2 192$ 90$ 90$ over 660 feet (custom)FLAT 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 90$ $ 144 161% $ 90 100%- -$ -$ -$ 44 Public Art Fee [4] Residential (per unit)FLAT [6] [8]750$ 750$ Commercial/Industrial (per sq.ft.)FLAT [6] [8]1$ 1$ 45 Public Convenience or Necessity (ABC License) FLAT [4]19.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 21.80 4,630$ $ 4,283 93% $ 4,630 100%1 4,283$ 4,630$ 4,630$ 46 Public Noticing [3] [4] Staff Time - small mailer (< 200)FLAT 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 448$ $ 204 46% $ 448 100%12 2,448$ 5,380$ 5,380$ Staff Time - Large mailer (200 +)FLAT 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 897$ NEW % $ 897 100%- -$ -$ -$ Advertising - Actual Cost FLAT [8] $ 630 $ 630 47 SB 330 Preliminary Application Fee FLAT [4]3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 672$ NEW % $ 672 100%- -$ -$ -$ 48 Sign Permit FLAT [4]1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 269$ $ 246 91% $ 269 100%133 32,718$ 35,777$ 35,777$ 49 Similar Use Determination FLAT 22.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.40 5,021$ $ 4,594 91% $ 5,021 100%- -$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 3 of 6Page 204 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity 50 Site Development Review Residential FLAT 5.00 1.00 0.20 0.00 4.00 0.00 10.20 2,083$ $ 755 36% $ 2,083 100%3 2,265$ 6,250$ 6,250$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT 9.10 1.00 0.50 0.00 4.00 0.00 14.60 3,029$ $ 2,272 75% $ 3,029 100%14 31,808$ 42,405$ 42,405$ 51 Specific Plan - New DEPOSIT [5]180.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 230.00 47,400$ $ 50,000 105% $ 47,400 100%- -$ -$ -$ 52 Specific Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5]70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 15,692$ $ 10,000 64% $ 15,692 100%- -$ -$ -$ 53 Master Plan - New DEPOSIT [5]180.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 230.00 47,400$ $ 40,000 84% $ 47,400 100%- -$ -$ -$ 54 Master Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5]70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 15,692$ $ 10,000 64% $ 15,692 100%- -$ -$ -$ 55 Street Name Change FLAT 43.30 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.80 9,769$ $ 8,938 91% $ 9,769 100%- -$ -$ -$ 56 Technical Report Review [4] City Administrative Processing Fee FLAT [6]8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 1,793$ $ 1,641 92% $ 1,793 100%- -$ -$ -$ Consultant Cost FLAT [6] Actual Cost Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] Actual Cost Actual Cost 57 Temporary Use Permit [4] Model Home Sales Office / Temporary Offices FLAT 13.60 1.00 0.00 1.9 4.00 0.00 18.60 3,994$ $ 3,194 80% $ 3,994 100%- -$ -$ -$ Non-Profit FLAT 4.80 0.50 0.30 0.75 4.00 0.30 10.65 2,127$ $ 215 10% $ 2,127 100%7 1,505$ 14,892$ 14,892$ Residential (non-commerical) Haunted Houses FLAT 4.80 0.50 0.30 0.75 4.00 0.30 10.65 2,127$ No Charge % $ 2,127 100%- -$ -$ -$ All Others FLAT 4.80 0.50 0.30 0.75 4.00 0.30 10.65 2,127$ $ 610 29% $ 2,127 100%15 9,150$ 31,912$ 31,912$ 58 Tentative Parcel Map FLAT 27.00 11.00 0.50 2.20 0.20 0.00 40.90 7,846$ $ 7,558 96% $ 7,846 100%4 30,232$ 31,385$ 31,385$ 59 Tentative Parcel Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification)FLAT 12.00 5.00 0.20 1.20 0.20 0.00 18.60 3,556$ $ 3,452 97% $ 3,556 100%- -$ -$ -$ 60 Tentative Tract Map 5 - 10 lots FLAT 38.00 11.00 0.30 2.70 0.20 0.00 52.20 10,370$ $ 9,947 96% $ 10,370 100%2 19,894$ 20,741$ 20,741$ 11 - 25 lots FLAT 48.60 11.00 0.30 3.20 0.20 0.00 63.30 12,822$ $ 12,272 96% $ 12,822 100%1 12,272$ 12,822$ 12,822$ 26+ lots DEPOSIT [5]68.00 25.00 0.30 4.20 0.20 0.00 97.70 19,073$ $ 15,000 79% $ 19,073 100%- -$ -$ -$ 61 Tentative Tract Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) FLAT 20.00 8.00 0.30 2.20 0.20 0.00 30.70 5,885$ $ 5,755 98% $ 5,885 100%- -$ -$ -$ 62 Third and subsequent submittal review FLAT [1]7.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.80 1,748$ $1,580 or 20% of the original application fee, whichever is less % $ 1,748 100%3 3,120$ 5,245$ 5,245$ 63 Time Extension Administrative Approval FLAT 11.25 0.00 0.20 1.40 0.20 0.00 13.05 2,793$ $ 2,567 92% $ 2,793 100%- -$ -$ -$ PC Approval FLAT 35.00 10.00 0.20 1.40 0.20 0.00 46.80 9,367$ $ 8,596 92% $ 9,367 100%1 8,596$ 9,367$ 9,367$ 64 Trail Easement Vacation FLAT 75.00 5.00 1.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 81.40 17,584$ $ 6,857 39% $ 17,584 100%- -$ -$ -$ 65 Transfer of Development Rights FLAT 14.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.30 3,206$ $ 2,957 92% $ 3,206 100%- -$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 4 of 6Page 205 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity 66 Tree Removal Permits Single Family Residential Live Trees FLAT 2.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 466$ $ 203 44% $ 466 100%5 1,015$ 2,330$ 2,330$ Dead Trees (No Charge)FLAT 2.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 466$ No Charge % $ 466 100%- -$ -$ -$ Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial Administrative Approval up to 4 trees FLAT 4.50 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.70 1,026$ $ 943 92% $ 1,026 100%3 2,829$ 3,079$ 3,079$ Administrative Approval 5 or more trees FLAT 8.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.40 1,856$ $ 1,702 92% $ 1,856 100%5 8,510$ 9,279$ 9,279$ New Development 1 - 10 trees FLAT 10.50 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.70 2,371$ $ 2,174 92% $ 2,371 100%- -$ -$ -$ 11 - 20 trees FLAT 15.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.20 3,380$ $ 3,097 92% $ 3,380 100%1 3,097$ 3,380$ 3,380$ 21+ trees FLAT 20.50 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.70 4,613$ $ 4,224 92% $ 4,613 100%- -$ -$ -$ Processing fee for tree removed with no permit FLAT 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 336$ NEW % $ 336 100%- -$ -$ -$ 67 Tribal Consultation FLAT [4]10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2,242$ $ 1,500 67% $ 2,242 100%- -$ -$ -$ 68 Uniform Sign Program FLAT [4]22.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.30 4,999$ $ 4,573 91% $ 4,999 100%2 9,146$ 9,998$ 9,998$ 69 Uniform Sign Program Modification FLAT [4]12.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.60 2,824$ $ 2,067 73% $ 2,824 100%- -$ -$ -$ 70 Variance FLAT 28.50 0.00 0.20 0.90 2.00 0.00 31.60 6,953$ $ 5,006 72% $ 6,953 100%- -$ -$ -$ 71 Zoning Map Amendment FLAT [7]78.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.20 17,530$ $ 12,830 73% $ 17,530 100%- -$ -$ -$ 72 General Plan Maintenance Fee surcharge [8] 10% on top of selected planning applications and building permits 10% on top of selected planning applications and building permits 73 Technology Fee surcharge [8]7%7% REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS [*] 1 On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign DEPOSIT [6] [8] $ 706 $ 706 2 Off-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign DEPOSIT [6] [8] $ 706 $ 706 3 Notice of Filing Sign (per sign)DEPOSIT [6] [8] $ 971 $ 971 4 Temporary Use Permit Model Home Restoration Deposit DEPOSIT [6] [8] $ 883 $ 883 NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 5 of 6Page 206 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.1 PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY FIRE POLICE Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate:Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: Hourly Rate: $ 224 $ 125 $ 88 $ 152 $ 205 $ 96 Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Rec'd Fee Level / Deposit Rec'd Cost Recovery % Estimate d Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Rec'd Fee Activity Service Cost Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Fees for development entitlements or services not listed will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Planning Director. It will be based on the fully burdened hourly rate and the time of service provided. Applications requiring three or more entitlements from the fee list will use the fee schedule to establish a deposit amount. TOTAL 850,758$ 1,218,263$ 1,218,263$ [Notes] [*]Fee includes base fee plus additional Technology Fee and General Plan Maintenance Fee where applicable [1]50% of the original base fee. Technology fee and General Plan Maintenance Fee apply. [2]City Attorney fee charged based on actual cost. [3]Advertising fee is charged per advertisement. Where advertising in the newspaper is not required, but only mailers are required, only staff time will be charged. [4]Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee [5]Technology fee and General Plan Maintenance Fee will be charged at current rates and deducted from the deposit amount [6]Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee or the Technology Fee [7]Includes Overlay Districts [8]NBS did not evaluate NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COS,Page 6 of 6Page 207 Prepared by NBS for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX A.2 Cost of Service Analysis – Building and Safety Department Page 208 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES 1 Processing Fee [2] Residential - Routed each [4]2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%665 202,160$ 201,789$ 201,789$ Residential - Non-routed each [4]0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 121$ 79$ 65%121$ 100%3,707 292,853$ 449,943$ 449,943$ Commercial - Routed each [4]2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%488 185,440$ 185,099$ 185,099$ Commercial - Non-routed each [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%523 80,019$ 79,350$ 79,350$ No Plan Check Required Processing each [4]0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 38$ 146$ 385%38$ 100%1,078 157,419$ 40,897$ 40,897$ COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION, ADDITIONS, AND TENANT IMPROVMENTS (Includes all associated MEP's) A Class 1 With food and/or drink 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.3.00 3.20 1.50 1.00 1.00 9.70 1,517$ 1,531$ 101%1,517$ 100%7 10,717$ 10,622$ 10,622$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.1200 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.2200 33.38$ 27$ n/a 33.38$ 100%18 478$ 591$ 591$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 5.60 2.50 1.00 1.00 14.10 2,185$ 2,050$ 94%2,185$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0160 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.1360 20.63$ 27$ n/a 20.63$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.6.00 6.00 3.50 1.00 1.00 17.50 2,701$ 2,720$ 101%2,701$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0200 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0900 13.65$ 15$ n/a 13.65$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 7.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 22.00 3,384$ 3,466$ 102%3,384$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0700 0.0500 0.0100 0.0100 0.2200 33.84$ 36$ n/a 33.84$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 Without food and/or drink 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2.00 2.80 1.90 1.00 1.00 8.70 1,366$ 1,226$ 90%1,366$ 100%1 613$ 683$ 683$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.0700 0.0550 0.0000 0.0000 0.1750 26.55$ 27$ n/a 26.55$ 100%2 45$ 45$ 45$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.3.00 4.20 3.00 1.00 1.00 12.20 1,897$ 1,720$ 91%1,897$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1200 0.0560 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.2160 32.77$ 32$ n/a 32.77$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.6.00 5.60 4.00 1.00 1.00 17.60 2,716$ 2,581$ 95%2,716$ 100%1 1,291$ 1,358$ 1,358$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0080 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0480 7.28$ 9$ n/a 7.28$ 100%0.12 1$ 1$ 1$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 20.00 3,080$ 3,100$ 101%3,080$ 100%1 3,100$ 3,080$ 3,080$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0600 0.0600 0.0600 0.0100 0.0100 0.2000 30.80$ 31$ n/a 30.80$ 100%3 102$ 101$ 101$ Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 1 of 16Page 209 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 3 With food and/or drink over 300 2,000 base fee up to 2,000 s.f.5.00 4.80 3.00 1.00 1.00 14.80 2,291$ 2,277$ 99%2,291$ 100%1 1,139$ 1,146$ 1,146$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0375 0.0100 0.0625 0.0000 0.0000 0.1100 16.69$ 17$ n/a 16.69$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 5.60 8.00 1.00 1.00 23.60 3,626$ 3,710$ 102%3,626$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0160 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0660 10.01$ 9$ n/a 10.01$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.12.00 7.20 9.00 1.00 1.00 30.20 4,628$ 4,685$ 101%4,628$ 100%1 4,685$ 4,628$ 4,628$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0600 0.0360 0.0450 0.0050 0.0050 0.1510 23.14$ 23$ n/a 23.14$ 100%0.52 12$ 12$ 12$ 4 Without food and/or drink over 300 2,000 base fee up to 2,000 s.f.3.00 4.20 2.50 1.00 1.00 11.70 1,821$ 1,683$ 92%1,821$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0375 0.0175 0.0563 0.0000 0.0000 0.1113 16.88$ 16$ n/a 16.88$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.6.00 5.60 7.00 1.00 1.00 20.60 3,171$ 3,040$ 96%3,171$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0140 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0640 9.71$ 9$ n/a 9.71$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.10.00 7.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 27.00 4,142$ 4,014$ 97%4,142$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.0350 0.0400 0.0050 0.0050 0.1350 20.71$ 19$ n/a 20.71$ 100%-$ -$ -$ B Class 1 Office and Public Buildings 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 956$ 937$ 98%956$ 100%12 11,244$ 11,473$ 11,473$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0625 9.48$ 10$ n/a 9.48$ 100%11 106$ 100$ 100$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2.00 3.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 7.25 1,146$ 1,150$ 100%1,146$ 100%6.00 6,900$ 6,874$ 6,874$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1200 18.21$ 27$ n/a 18.21$ 100%2.05 55$ 37$ 37$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.4.00 4.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.25 1,601$ 1,820$ 114%1,601$ 100%4.50 8,190$ 7,204$ 7,204$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0500 7.59$ 7$ n/a 7.59$ 100%1.68 12$ 13$ 13$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.5.00 5.75 0.00 1.00 1.00 12.75 1,980$ 2,186$ 110%1,980$ 100%2 3,279$ 2,970$ 2,970$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.0575 0.0000 0.0100 0.0100 0.1275 19.80$ 22$ n/a 19.80$ 100%0.31 7$ 6$ 6$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 2 of 16Page 210 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 2 Service 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.3.00 2.80 0.00 1.00 1.00 7.80 1,229$ 1,241$ 101%1,229$ 100%6 6,826$ 6,760$ 6,760$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1200 18.21$ 10$ n/a 18.21$ 100%12 120$ 219$ 219$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 4.20 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.20 1,593$ 1,455$ 91%1,593$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0560 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0960 14.57$ 20$ n/a 14.57$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.5.00 5.60 0.00 1.00 1.00 12.60 1,957$ 1,973$ 101%1,957$ 100%2 2,960$ 2,936$ 2,936$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.1120 0.0000 0.0200 0.0200 0.2520 39.15$ 40$ n/a 39.15$ 100%2 64$ 63$ 63$ 3 Medical 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.6.00 4.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.20 2,048$ 1,912$ 93%2,048$ 100%2 3,824$ 4,097$ 4,097$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.0700 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.2200 33.38$ 34$ n/a 33.38$ 100%1 49$ 48$ 48$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.8.00 5.60 2.00 1.00 1.00 17.60 2,716$ 2,581$ 95%2,716$ 100%1 2,581$ 2,716$ 2,716$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1600 0.0560 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.2560 38.84$ 39$ n/a 38.84$ 100%1 28$ 28$ 28$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.12.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 24.00 3,687$ 3,557$ 96%3,687$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.2400 0.1400 0.0600 0.0200 0.0200 0.4800 73.74$ 71$ n/a 73.74$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 4 Restaurant 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 4.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 10.50 1,639$ 1,531$ 93%1,639$ 100%16.00 24,496$ 26,221$ 26,221$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.0800 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.1800 27.31$ 27$ n/a 27.31$ 100%24.67 666$ 674$ 674$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.5.00 5.60 1.50 1.00 1.00 14.10 2,185$ 2,049$ 94%2,185$ 100%2.50 5,123$ 5,462$ 5,462$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.1400 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.2900 44.00$ 44$ n/a 44.00$ 100%0.25 11$ 11$ 11$ 3,500 base fee up to 3,500 s.f.6.00 7.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 17.00 2,625$ 2,490$ 95%2,625$ 100%1.00 2,490$ 2,625$ 2,625$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1714 0.2000 0.0571 0.0286 0.0286 0.4857 75.00$ 71$ n/a 75.00$ 100%0.50 36$ 37$ 37$ 5 Laboratories 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.6.00 4.20 3.00 1.00 1.00 15.20 2,352$ 2,217$ 94%2,352$ 100%3 6,651$ 7,056$ 7,056$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0700 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0950 14.41$ 14$ n/a 14.41$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.6.00 5.60 3.50 1.00 1.00 17.10 2,640$ 2,507$ 95%2,640$ 100%1 2,507$ 2,640$ 2,640$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0560 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.1960 29.74$ 30$ n/a 29.74$ 100%0 8$ 8$ 8$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.8.00 7.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 22.00 3,384$ 3,253$ 96%3,384$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1600 0.1400 0.1000 0.0200 0.0200 0.4400 67.67$ 65$ n/a 67.67$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 3 of 16Page 211 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee E Class 1 Day Care / Private School 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.8.00 2.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.80 2,139$ 2,003$ 94%2,139$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1400 0.1250 0.0000 0.0000 0.2650 40.21$ 41$ n/a 40.21$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.8.00 5.60 3.50 1.00 1.00 19.10 2,944$ 2,811$ 95%2,944$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0560 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.1960 29.74$ 30$ n/a 29.74$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.10.00 7.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 24.00 3,687$ 3,557$ 96%3,687$ 100%1 1,779$ 1,844$ 1,844$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0280 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.1080 16.39$ 16$ n/a 16.39$ 100%0.35 6$ 6$ 6$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.12.00 8.40 7.00 1.00 1.00 29.40 4,506$ 4,381$ 97%4,506$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1200 0.0840 0.0700 0.0100 0.0100 0.2940 45.06$ 44$ n/a 45.06$ 100%-$ -$ -$ F Class 1 Industrial / Manufacturing F1/F2 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.3.00 5.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 11.80 1,836$ 1,698$ 92%1,836$ 100%0.50 849$ 918$ 918$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0133 0.0187 0.0107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0427 6.47$ 6$ n/a 6.47$ 100%0.66 4$ 4$ 4$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4.00 7.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 15.00 2,322$ 2,186$ 94%2,322$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0140 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0440 6.68$ 6$ n/a 6.68$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.6.00 8.40 3.00 1.00 1.00 19.40 2,989$ 2,856$ 96%2,989$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0300 0.0420 0.0150 0.0050 0.0050 0.0970 14.95$ 14$ n/a 14.95$ 100%-$ -$ -$ H Class 1 H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.8.00 5.60 6.00 1.00 1.00 21.60 3,323$ 3,191$ 96%3,323$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0533 0.0187 0.0267 0.0000 0.0000 0.0987 14.97$ 15$ n/a 14.97$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.12.00 7.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 29.00 4,446$ 4,319$ 97%4,446$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0600 0.0140 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0940 14.26$ 14$ n/a 14.26$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.18.00 8.40 10.00 1.00 1.00 38.40 5,872$ 5,751$ 98%5,872$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0900 0.0420 0.0500 0.0050 0.0050 0.1920 29.36$ 29$ n/a 29.36$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 4 of 16Page 212 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee I Class 1 All I classifications 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 4.20 3.00 1.00 1.00 13.20 2,048$ 1,912$ 93%2,048$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.0700 0.0750 0.0000 0.0000 0.2450 37.17$ 38$ n/a 37.17$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.6.00 5.60 4.50 1.00 1.00 18.10 2,792$ 2,659$ 95%2,792$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.0560 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.1960 29.74$ 30$ n/a 29.74$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.8.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 23.00 3,535$ 3,405$ 96%3,535$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.0280 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.1280 19.42$ 19$ n/a 19.42$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.10.00 8.40 9.00 1.00 1.00 29.40 4,506$ 4,381$ 97%4,506$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.0840 0.0900 0.0100 0.0100 0.2940 45.06$ 44$ n/a 45.06$ 100%-$ -$ -$ M Class 1 Retail 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 6.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 12.50 1,942$ 937$ 48%1,942$ 100%8 7,028$ 14,567$ 14,567$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.1750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2750 41.72$ 18$ n/a 41.72$ 100%13 228$ 529$ 529$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.6.00 10.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 18.00 2,777$ 1,302$ 47%2,777$ 100%10 13,020$ 27,767$ 27,767$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0267 0.0267 0.0533 0.0000 0.0000 0.1067 16.18$ 8$ n/a 16.18$ 100%7 55$ 111$ 111$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 12.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 26.00 3,990$ 1,901$ 48%3,990$ 100%3 4,753$ 9,976$ 9,976$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0075 0.0150 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 3.60$ 2$ n/a 3.60$ 100%4 8$ 14$ 14$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.11.00 18.00 4.50 1.00 1.00 35.50 5,432$ 2,643$ 49%5,432$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0100 0.0140 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0310 4.70$ 2$ n/a 4.70$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.16.00 25.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 51.00 7,783$ 3,466$ 45%7,783$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0160 0.0250 0.0080 0.0010 0.0010 0.0510 7.78$ 3$ n/a 7.78$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 5 of 16Page 213 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee S Class 1 S1/S2 Warehouses 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.7.00 15.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 27.00 4,142$ 982$ 24%4,142$ 100%9 8,347$ 35,209$ 35,209$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0050 0.0075 0.0020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0145 2.20$ 1$ n/a 2.20$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.9.00 18.00 3.80 1.00 1.00 32.80 5,022$ 1,287$ 26%5,022$ 100%1 1,287$ 5,022$ 5,022$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0030 0.0060 0.0016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0106 1.61$ 1$ n/a 1.61$ 100%0.92 1$ 1$ 1$ 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.15.00 30.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 54.00 8,239$ 1,576$ 19%8,239$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0008 0.0040 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0048 0.73$ 1$ n/a 0.73$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.17.00 40.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 66.00 10,059$ 2,065$ 21%10,059$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0006 0.0020 0.0018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0044 0.66$ 1$ n/a 0.66$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.20.00 50.00 15.90 1.00 1.00 87.90 13,382$ 2,489$ 19%13,382$ 100%1 2,489$ 13,382$ 13,382$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0020 0.0050 0.0016 0.0001 0.0001 0.0088 1.34$ 1$ n/a 1.34$ 100%0.40 0$ 1$ 1$ 2 S1 Mini Storage 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2.00 2.80 1.50 1.00 1.00 8.30 1,305$ 1,165$ 89%1,305$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0133 0.0187 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0520 7.89$ 7$ n/a 7.89$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3.00 4.20 3.00 1.00 1.00 12.20 1,897$ 1,760$ 93%1,897$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0100 0.0140 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0440 6.68$ 6$ n/a 6.68$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.4.00 5.60 5.00 1.00 1.00 16.60 2,564$ 2,430$ 95%2,564$ 100%1.00 2,430$ 2,564$ 2,564$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0280 0.0250 0.0050 0.0050 0.0830 12.82$ 12$ n/a 12.82$ 100%9.14 110$ 117$ 117$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 6 of 16Page 214 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 3 S1 Parking Garages (open or closed) 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.7.00 13.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 27.00 4,142$ 1,760$ 42%4,142$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0050 0.0069 0.0000 0.0013 0.0013 0.0144 2.24$ 7$ n/a 2.24$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.9.00 15.75 5.00 1.50 1.50 32.75 5,037$ NEW %5,037$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0025 0.0071 0.0013 0.0003 0.0003 0.0114 1.74$ NEW n/a 1.74$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.14.00 30.00 7.50 2.00 2.00 55.50 8,512$ NEW %8,512$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0008 0.0040 0.0004 0.0002 0.0002 0.0056 0.86$ NEW n/a 0.86$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.16.00 40.00 8.50 2.50 2.50 69.50 10,659$ NEW %10,659$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0004 0.0020 0.0010 0.0001 0.0001 0.0036 0.55$ NEW n/a 0.55$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.18.00 50.00 13.55 3.00 3.00 87.55 13,420$ NEW %13,420$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0018 0.0050 0.0014 0.0003 0.0003 0.0088 1.34$ NEW n/a 1.34$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 4 S1 Repair Garage 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.3.00 5.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 11.80 1,836$ 1,698$ 92%1,836$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.1400 0.1350 0.0000 0.0000 0.3250 49.31$ 49$ n/a 49.31$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 8.40 3.90 1.00 1.00 18.30 2,822$ 2,689$ 95%2,822$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0400 0.1120 0.0240 0.0000 0.0000 0.1760 26.70$ 27$ n/a 26.70$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.5.00 11.20 4.50 1.00 1.00 22.70 3,490$ 3,359$ 96%3,490$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1000 0.2240 0.0900 0.0200 0.0200 0.4540 69.80$ 67$ n/a 69.80$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 7 of 16Page 215 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 5 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.6.50 12.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 24.50 3,763$ 2,490$ 66%3,763$ 100%5.50 13,695$ 20,696$ 20,696$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0038 0.0075 0.0025 0.0013 0.0013 0.0163 2.52$ 2$ n/a 2.52$ 100%3.38 7$ 9$ 9$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.8.00 15.00 5.00 1.50 1.50 31.00 4,772$ 3,477$ 73%4,772$ 100%1.00 3,477$ 4,772$ 4,772$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0028 0.0075 0.0039 0.0000 0.0000 0.0142 2.15$ 1$ n/a 2.15$ 100%2.10 2$ 5$ 5$ 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.13.50 30.00 12.80 1.50 1.50 59.30 9,066$ 4,361$ 48%9,066$ 100%1.00 4,361$ 9,066$ 9,066$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0014 0.0012 (0.0002) 0.0002 0.0002 0.0028 0.43$ 1$ n/a 0.43$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.17.00 33.00 12.30 2.00 2.00 66.30 10,151$ 5,347$ 53%10,151$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0006 0.0034 0.0011 0.0002 0.0002 0.0055 0.84$ 1$ n/a 0.84$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.20.00 50.00 17.80 3.00 3.00 93.80 14,369$ 6,535$ 45%14,369$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0020 0.0050 0.0018 0.0003 0.0003 0.0094 1.44$ 1$ n/a 1.44$ 100%-$ -$ -$ RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION (Includes all associated MEP's) R Class 1 R1/R2 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.3.00 5.60 2.00 0.50 0.50 11.60 1,783$ 1,718$ 96%1,783$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.1400 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2900 44.00$ 44$ n/a 44.00$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 8.40 4.00 0.50 0.50 17.40 2,663$ 2,601$ 98%2,663$ 100%4 9,104$ 9,320$ 9,320$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0533 0.0747 0.0400 0.0067 0.0067 0.1813 27.82$ 26$ n/a 27.82$ 100%3 82$ 87$ 87$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 14.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 31.00 4,749$ 4,521$ 95%4,749$ 100%6 27,126$ 28,494$ 28,494$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0150 0.0075 0.0013 0.0013 0.0450 6.88$ 5$ n/a 6.88$ 100%10 48$ 66$ 66$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.16.00 20.00 10.00 1.50 1.50 49.00 7,503$ 6,837$ 91%7,503$ 100%2 10,256$ 11,254$ 11,254$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0160 0.0200 0.0100 0.0030 0.0030 0.0520 8.03$ 5$ n/a 8.03$ 100%1 5$ 8$ 8$ 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.24.00 30.00 15.00 3.00 3.00 75.00 11,516$ 9,458$ 82%11,516$ 100%1 9,458$ 11,516$ 11,516$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0240 0.0300 0.0150 0.0030 0.0030 0.0750 11.52$ 9$ n/a 11.52$ 100%0.39 4$ 4$ 4$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 8 of 16Page 216 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 2 R1/R2 Major Remodels 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 4.20 2.00 0.50 0.50 11.20 1,722$ 1,657$ 96%1,722$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.2000 0.1400 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.3900 59.17$ 59$ n/a 59.17$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.8.00 7.00 3.00 0.50 0.50 19.00 2,906$ 2,845$ 98%2,906$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0267 0.0933 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.1600 24.28$ 15$ n/a 24.28$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.10.00 14.00 6.00 0.50 0.50 31.00 4,726$ 4,034$ 85%4,726$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0150 0.0050 0.0025 0.0025 0.0450 6.94$ 4$ n/a 6.94$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.18.00 20.00 8.00 1.50 1.50 49.00 7,503$ 5,984$ 80%7,503$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0160 0.0200 0.0080 0.0030 0.0030 0.0500 7.72$ 5$ n/a 7.72$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.26.00 30.00 12.00 3.00 3.00 74.00 11,365$ 8,666$ 76%11,365$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0260 0.0300 0.0120 0.0030 0.0030 0.0740 11.36$ 8$ n/a 11.36$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 R2 Production Rate 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.0.00 5.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 6.00 933$ 1,169$ 125%933$ 100%20 22,796$ 18,197$ 18,197$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0667 10.11$ 10$ n/a 10.11$ 100%19 190$ 192$ 192$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.0.00 10.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 11.00 1,692$ 2,023$ 120%1,692$ 100%7 13,150$ 10,997$ 10,997$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0400 6.07$ 6$ n/a 6.07$ 100%3 18$ 18$ 18$ 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.0.00 14.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 15.00 2,299$ 2,662$ 116%2,299$ 100%9 22,627$ 19,539$ 19,539$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0700 0.0000 0.0025 0.0025 0.0750 11.49$ 13$ n/a 11.49$ 100%2 26$ 23$ 23$ 4 R2.1 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 7.00 3.00 0.50 0.50 15.00 2,299$ 2,235$ 97%2,299$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1400 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.1900 28.83$ 29$ n/a 28.83$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 9.80 4.00 0.50 0.50 18.80 2,875$ 2,815$ 98%2,875$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0533 0.0747 0.0400 0.0067 0.0067 0.1813 27.82$ 26$ n/a 27.82$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 15.40 7.00 1.00 1.00 32.40 4,961$ 4,734$ 95%4,961$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0115 0.0075 0.0013 0.0013 0.0415 6.35$ 5$ n/a 6.35$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.16.00 20.00 10.00 1.50 1.50 49.00 7,503$ 7,050$ 94%7,503$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0080 0.0200 0.0140 0.0030 0.0030 0.0480 7.42$ 4$ n/a 7.42$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.20.00 30.00 17.00 3.00 3.00 73.00 11,213$ 9,366$ 84%11,213$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0300 0.0170 0.0030 0.0030 0.0730 11.21$ 9$ n/a 11.21$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 9 of 16Page 217 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 5 R3 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 4.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 12.00 1,912$ 1,873$ 98%1,912$ 100%77 143,285$ 146,276$ 146,276$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2600 39.45$ 50$ n/a 39.45$ 100%22 1,090$ 860$ 860$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.5.00 8.20 0.00 2.00 2.00 17.20 2,701$ 2,879$ 107%2,701$ 100%6 17,274$ 16,206$ 16,206$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1200 0.1720 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2920 44.30$ 52$ n/a 44.30$ 100%3 148$ 126$ 126$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.8.00 12.50 0.00 2.00 2.00 24.50 3,809$ 4,189$ 110%3,809$ 100%8 33,512$ 30,469$ 30,469$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0700 10.62$ 17$ n/a 10.62$ 100%3 57$ 36$ 36$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 16.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 28.00 4,340$ 4,034$ 93%4,340$ 100%1 4,034$ 4,340$ 4,340$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.1600 0.0000 0.0200 0.0200 0.2800 43.40$ 4$ n/a 43.40$ 100%0.06 0$ 3$ 3$ 6 R3 Production Rate 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.0.00 5.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 9.00 1,457$ 1,172$ 80%1,457$ 100%1 586$ 728$ 728$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1400 21.24$ 37$ n/a 21.24$ 100%2 74$ 42$ 42$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.0.00 7.80 0.00 2.00 2.00 11.80 1,882$ 1,903$ 101%1,882$ 100%5 9,515$ 9,409$ 9,409$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1280 19.42$ 19$ n/a 19.42$ 100%4 77$ 79$ 79$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.0.00 11.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 15.00 2,367$ 2,392$ 101%2,367$ 100%18 43,056$ 42,611$ 42,611$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0800 12.14$ 15$ n/a 12.14$ 100%4 63$ 51$ 51$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.0.00 15.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 19.00 2,974$ 3,184$ 107%2,974$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1500 0.0000 0.0200 0.0200 0.1900 29.74$ 32$ n/a 29.74$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 7 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build-Out Only) 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.3.00 4.20 2.00 0.50 0.50 10.20 1,570$ 1,504$ 96%1,570$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0700 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1700 25.79$ 27$ n/a 25.79$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.3.00 5.60 4.00 0.50 0.50 13.60 2,086$ 2,023$ 97%2,086$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1200 0.0560 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.2160 32.77$ 34$ n/a 32.77$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.6.00 7.00 5.00 0.50 0.50 19.00 2,906$ 2,845$ 98%2,906$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0280 4.25$ 4$ n/a 4.25$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.6.00 8.40 5.00 0.50 0.50 20.40 3,118$ 3,059$ 98%3,118$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0600 0.0840 0.0500 0.0050 0.0050 0.2040 31.18$ 31$ n/a 31.18$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 10 of 16Page 218 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 8 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2.00 4.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 1,609$ 1,568$ 97%1,609$ 100%89 139,552$ 143,171$ 143,171$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0500 0.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2600 39.45$ 50$ n/a 39.45$ 100%325 16,244$ 12,816$ 12,816$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.3.00 8.20 0.00 2.00 2.00 15.20 2,398$ 2,574$ 107%2,398$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.1200 0.3280 0.0000 0.0800 0.0800 0.6080 95.90$ 103$ n/a 95.90$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 9 R4 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.4.00 7.00 3.00 0.50 0.50 15.00 2,299$ 2,235$ 97%2,299$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.1400 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.1900 28.83$ 29$ n/a 28.83$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.4.00 9.80 4.00 0.50 0.50 18.80 2,875$ 2,815$ 98%2,875$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0080 1.21$ 26$ n/a 1.21$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.4.00 10.00 4.00 0.50 0.50 19.00 2,906$ 3,465$ 119%2,906$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0800 0.1080 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.2480 37.63$ 27$ n/a 37.63$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.8.00 15.40 7.00 0.50 0.50 31.40 4,787$ 4,734$ 99%4,787$ 100%-$ -$ -$ each additional 100 s.f. or fraction thereof each add 'l 100 s.f.0.0200 0.0105 0.0075 0.0000 (0.0013) 0.0368 5.61$ 5$ n/a 5.61$ 100%-$ -$ -$ MINOR IMPROVEMENTS/ MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1 Antenna each 1.00 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 4.30 689$ 682$ 99%689$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 New Cell tower w/equipment shelter each [1]3.00 7.00 2.00 1.50 0.00 13.50 2,157$ 2,137$ 99%2,157$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Cell Site modification each 1.00 0.65 0.50 0.50 0.00 2.65 438$ 544$ 124%438$ 100%36 19,584$ 15,778$ 15,778$ 4 Tent or awning w/sides- 200-400 sq ft each [1]1.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 364$ 220$ 60%346$ 95%2 440$ 728$ 692$ 5 Tent/awning - 401 + sq ft each [1]1.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.10 470$ 290$ 62%447$ 95%2 435$ 706$ 670$ 6 Balcony/Deck - first 500 sq ft each [1]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 682$ 139%491$ 100%15 9,889$ 7,125$ 7,125$ 7 Balcony/Deck - each additional 500 sq ft each [1]1.00 1.40 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.90 476$ 468$ 98%476$ 100%3 1,254$ 1,276$ 1,276$ 8 Demolition Residential each 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 2.80 447$ 671$ 150%447$ 100%12 7,717$ 5,135$ 5,135$ 9 Demolition multi family/commercial each 1.00 1.40 0.20 0.30 0.00 2.90 462$ 458$ 99%462$ 100%23 10,305$ 10,389$ 10,389$ 10 Shoring each [4]0.00 1.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 1.60 243$ 244$ 101%243$ 100%2 488$ 486$ 486$ 11 Wall opening (windows/doors) new/altered [1] [4] Retrofit windows 1-5 windows each 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.50 416$ 151$ 36%395$ 95%82 12,400$ 34,123$ 32,417$ Retrofit windows 6-15 windows each 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 301$ 61%467$ 95%-$ -$ -$ Retrofit windows 16 + windows - hourly each 1.00 2.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 4.00 643$ 151$ 23%611$ 95%-$ -$ -$ New Construction 1-5 windows each 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.50 416$ 301$ 72%395$ 95%13 3,848$ 5,312$ 5,046$ New Construction 6-15 windows each 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 452$ 92%467$ 95%16 7,161$ 7,785$ 7,395$ New Construction 16 + windows - hourly each 1.00 2.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 4.00 643$ 151$ 23%611$ 95%-$ -$ -$ 12 Dock levelers each [1] [4]1.00 2.10 0.00 0.30 0.00 3.40 538$ 534$ 99%538$ 100%2 1,068$ 1,075$ 1,075$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 11 of 16Page 219 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 13 Block wall 3-6 ft high - 1st 100 linear ft. each [1]0.00 2.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.50 416$ 406$ 98%395$ 95%66 26,593$ 27,217$ 25,856$ Each add 'l 50 linear ft each [1]0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 106$ 106$ 100%101$ 95%10 1,103$ 1,106$ 1,050$ 14 Masonry pilasters - 1- 10 each [1]0.50 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 182$ 183$ 101%182$ 100%2 366$ 364$ 364$ 15 Fence(wood, wrought iron, chain link) over 6' high each [1]0.50 2.10 0.20 0.50 0.00 3.30 537$ 406$ 76%510$ 95%3 1,218$ 1,611$ 1,530$ 16 Fire place- masonry each [1] [4]1.00 3.50 0.00 0.30 0.00 4.80 750$ 737$ 98%750$ 100%1 737$ 750$ 750$ 17 Fire place pre fab metal each [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 3.30 522$ 518$ 99%522$ 100%1 518$ 522$ 522$ 18 Flagpole over 20' high each [1]1.00 1.40 0.00 0.30 0.00 2.70 431$ 427$ 99%431$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 19 Garage First 500 sq ft each 1.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 5.00 795$ 895$ 113%795$ 100%14 12,530$ 11,128$ 11,128$ 20 Garage each additional 500 sq ft each 0.75 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 326$ 328$ 101%326$ 100%85 27,723$ 27,570$ 27,570$ 21 Patio cover - 1st 1,000 sq ft (standard and pre- engineered)each [1]0.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.00 340$ 423$ 125%340$ 100%149 62,816$ 50,440$ 50,440$ 22 Patio cover- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 212$ 213$ 100%212$ 100%10 2,168$ 2,162$ 2,162$ 23 Patio enclosure First 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.80 613$ 605$ 99%613$ 100%4 2,118$ 2,145$ 2,145$ 24 Patio enclosure- each additional 500 sq ft each 0.50 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 288$ 289$ 100%288$ 100%1.03 298$ 297$ 297$ 25 Patio enclosure- pre-engineered- first 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30 501$ 503$ 100%501$ 100%4 1,761$ 1,752$ 1,752$ 26 Patio enclosure - pre-engineered- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 288$ 289$ 100%288$ 100%0.28 81$ 81$ 81$ 27 Defensible Space Review hourly [4]0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ NEW %152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 28 Septic pre-inspection hourly 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 213$ 140%152$ 100%29 6,177$ 4,400$ 4,400$ 29 Relocate building each 4.00 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 7.30 1,144$ 1,139$ 100%1,144$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 30 Retaining wall- 1st 100 linear ft each [1]0.50 2.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 406$ 83%467$ 95%66 26,796$ 32,431$ 30,810$ 31 Retaining wall- each additional 50 linear ft each [1]0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 76$ 76$ 100%72$ 95%127 9,654$ 9,637$ 9,155$ 32 Retaining wall over 6' high each [1]0.00 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.30 537$ 529$ 99%510$ 95%7 3,439$ 3,490$ 3,315$ 33 Barn/storage shed up to 500 sq ft each [1]1.00 2.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 4.00 643$ 788$ 123%643$ 100%10 7,486$ 6,110$ 6,110$ 34 Barn/storage shed each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 289$ 127%228$ 100%3 754$ 594$ 594$ 35 Bathroom Remodel each [1] [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 289$ 63%455$ 100%25 7,081$ 11,151$ 11,151$ 36 Interior remodel (residential) first 500 sq ft each [1] [4]2.00 2.80 0.00 0.30 0.00 5.10 796$ 523$ 66%756$ 95%59 30,857$ 46,935$ 44,588$ 37 Interior remodel (residential) - each additional 500 sq ft each [1] [4]1.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 364$ 366$ 101%346$ 95%16 5,695$ 5,666$ 5,383$ 38 Light Standards - first 5 each [1]1.00 2.10 1.00 0.50 0.00 4.60 734$ 727$ 99%734$ 100%8 5,453$ 5,506$ 5,506$ 39 Light Standards - each additional each [1]0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 53$ 54$ 102%53$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 40 Mobile home- Not in MH Park each 2.00 2.80 0.00 2.00 0.00 6.80 1,177$ 1,142$ 97%1,177$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 41 Temporary Building/Trailer each 1.00 2.10 1.00 0.50 0.00 4.60 734$ 727$ 99%734$ 100%2 1,454$ 1,468$ 1,468$ 42 Demising wall 1-100 linear feet- commercial each [1] [4]2.00 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 5.30 840$ 834$ 99%840$ 100%3 2,085$ 2,101$ 2,101$ 43 Demising wall each additional 100 linear ft. each [1] [4]0.50 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 182$ 183$ 101%182$ 100%1 183$ 182$ 182$ 44 Partition wall 1-50 linear feet- commercial each [1] [4]0.50 2.10 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.10 507$ 499$ 99%507$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 45 Partition wall each additional 50 linear feet each [1] [4]0.50 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 182$ 183$ 101%182$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 46 Signs- Blade, channel letter, directional (structural) each [1]0.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 396$ 131%303$ 100%11 4,356$ 3,338$ 3,338$ 47 Signs- Monument Signs (structural and electrical)each [1]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 578$ 127%455$ 100%11 6,358$ 5,007$ 5,007$ 48 Signs - Wall signs- (structural and electrical) each [1]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 472$ 124%379$ 100%74 34,692$ 27,879$ 27,879$ 49 Skylights / Smoke Hatches 1 - 10 each [1] [4]1.00 1.40 1.00 0.30 0.00 3.70 583$ 580$ 99%583$ 100%3 1,740$ 1,749$ 1,749$ 50 Pre fab spa/hot tub each [4]0.50 3.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 3.80 598$ 458$ 77%598$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 12 of 16Page 220 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 51 Stairs- each flight / story each [1] [4]0.50 2.10 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.10 507$ 499$ 99%507$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 52 Storage racks and catwalks- 1st 500 sq ft each [1] [4]1.00 2.80 1.00 0.00 0.00 4.80 728$ 731$ 100%728$ 100%2 1,462$ 1,457$ 1,457$ 53 Storage racks and catwalks- 501 sq ft-250,000 sq ft each [1] [4]2.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 1,214$ 1,462$ 120%1,214$ 100%31 44,591$ 37,020$ 37,020$ 54 Storage racks and catwalks- over 251,000 sq ft each [1] [4]2.00 6.40 4.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 1,881$ 2,195$ 117%1,881$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 55 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 0-500sq ft each [1] [4]2.00 2.80 1.00 0.50 0.00 6.30 992$ 986$ 99%992$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 56 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 501-5000 sq ft each [1] [4]3.00 4.20 1.50 0.00 0.00 8.70 1,320$ 1,315$ 100%1,320$ 100%1 658$ 660$ 660$ 57 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 5001 + sq ft each [1] [4]3.00 5.60 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.60 1,608$ 1,615$ 100%1,608$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 58 Vinyl lined or fiberglass swimming pool- Residential each [1] [4]0.50 3.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 3.80 598$ 777$ 130%598$ 100%2 1,554$ 1,197$ 1,197$ 59 Gunite swimming pool/spa - residential each [1] [4]1.00 3.25 0.00 0.30 0.00 4.55 712$ 1,068$ 150%712$ 100%106 112,674$ 75,123$ 75,123$ 60 Commercial swimming pool each [1] [4]2.00 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 7.50 1,174$ 1,626$ 138%1,174$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 61 Utility Release (Utility Connection) Inspection (First Meter)each [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 160$ 105%152$ 100%196 31,360$ 29,737$ 29,737$ Inspection - ea. additional meter per meter [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 160$ 105%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 62 Tile Lift and Re-lay- first 3500 sq ft each [4]0.00 1.70 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.20 370$ 527$ 142%370$ 100%125 65,875$ 46,251$ 46,251$ 63 Tile Lift and Re-lay- Each additional 3500 sq ft each [4]0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 219$ 72%303$ 100%22 4,741$ 6,570$ 6,570$ 64 Residential Composition Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each [1] [4]0.00 1.30 0.00 0.50 0.00 1.80 309$ 301$ 97%309$ 100%379 114,079$ 117,232$ 117,232$ 65 Residential Composition Roof - ea. additional 1,000 sq ft each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 152$ 100%152$ 100%248 37,629$ 37,560$ 37,560$ 66 Re-roofing - first 50,000 commercial each 0.00 2.10 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.60 431$ 423$ 98%431$ 100%18 7,403$ 7,537$ 7,537$ 67 Re-roofing - each additional 50,000 commercial each 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 159$ 237$ 149%159$ 100%27 6,432$ 4,324$ 4,324$ 68 Residential Tile Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each [4]1.00 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 417$ 376$ 90%417$ 100%63 23,500$ 26,077$ 26,077$ 69 Residential Tile Roof - each additional 1,000 sq ft each [4]0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 225$ 99%228$ 100%68 15,220$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 70 Roof framing (replacement) - 1st 1,000 sq ft residential each [1]0.50 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.60 394$ 375$ 95%394$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 71 Roof framing (replacement) each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 1.40 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.40 400$ 372$ 93%400$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 72 Roof coating- Commercial each [4]0.50 2.80 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.80 613$ 605$ 99%613$ 100%3 1,815$ 1,838$ 1,838$ 73 Roof coating- Residential each [4]0.00 1.40 0.00 0.50 0.00 1.90 324$ 316$ 97%324$ 100%1 316$ 324$ 324$ 74 Roof Repair up to 400 sq ft each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ NEW %152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 75 Room addition- up to 500 sq ft each [1]2.00 4.20 0.00 0.50 0.00 6.70 1,053$ 1,047$ 99%1,053$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 76 Room addition- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 2.10 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.10 507$ 499$ 99%507$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 77 Spray booth first 500 sq ft each [1] [4]2.00 2.80 3.00 0.50 0.00 8.30 1,296$ 1,291$ 100%1,296$ 100%1 1,291$ 1,296$ 1,296$ 78 Spray booth -each additional 500 sq ft each [1] [4]1.00 1.40 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.40 516$ 518$ 100%516$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 79 Sauna- pre-fabricated each [4]0.50 1.75 0.00 0.30 0.00 2.55 409$ 404$ 99%409$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 80 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer first 500 sq ft each 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 406$ 83%467$ 95%1 203$ 246$ 233$ 81 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer each additional 500 sq ft each 0.50 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 288$ 289$ 100%274$ 95%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 13 of 16Page 221 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 82 Solar/photovoltaic up to 15 Kw - Residential each [1]0.00 0.70 0.00 0.30 0.00 1.00 173$ 115$ 66%173$ 100%1,957 225,055$ 339,450$ 339,450$ 83 Solar/photovoltaic- ea. Kw over 15 Kw - Residential per kW [1]0.0000 0.0467 0.0000 0.0200 0.0000 0.0667 12$ 17$ 147%12$ 100%10,925 185,720$ 126,329$ 126,329$ 84 Solar/photovoltaic - 0-250 kw Commercial each [1]2.00 2.80 2.00 0.50 0.00 7.30 1,144$ 580$ 51%1,000$ 87%-$ -$ -$ 85 Solar/photovoltaic - ea. Kw over 250 Kw - Commercial per kW [1]0.0080 0.0112 0.0080 0.0020 0.0000 0.0292 5$ 6$ 131%5$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 86 Solar power storage system Commercial each [1]2.00 2.10 3.00 0.50 0.00 7.60 1,189$ 1,185$ 100%1,189$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 87 EV Charger each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 152$ 50%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 88 Swimming Pool remodel each [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 517$ 114%455$ 100%5 2,585$ 2,276$ 2,276$ 89 Swimming Pool replaster each [4]1.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 334$ 402$ 120%334$ 100%3 1,005$ 834$ 834$ 90 Trash Enclosure up to 100 linear ft each [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 403$ 89%455$ 100%9 3,426$ 3,869$ 3,869$ 91 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO)each [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 152$ 100%152$ 100%9 1,368$ 1,365$ 1,365$ 92 Insulation / drywall- first 500 sq ft each [4]0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 406$ 134%288$ 95%33 13,195$ 9,862$ 9,369$ 93 Insulation / drywall- each additional 500 sq ft each [4]0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 174$ 57%288$ 95%3 522$ 910$ 865$ 94 Percolation inspection (septic) each [4]0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 212$ 213$ 100%212$ 100%3 639$ 637$ 637$ 95 ADA or Seismic review (hourly)hourly [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 213$ 140%152$ 100%8 1,681$ 1,197$ 1,197$ 96 Cabana - outdoor living area with walls each [1]2.50 4.20 0.00 0.50 0.00 7.20 1,129$ 729$ 65%1,072$ 95%-$ -$ -$ 97 Fuel dispensing system each [4]3.00 2.80 3.00 1.00 0.00 9.80 1,559$ 1,546$ 99%1,559$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 98 Above ground tanks each 2.00 2.80 4.00 1.00 0.00 9.80 1,559$ 1,546$ 99%1,559$ 100%3 4,638$ 4,678$ 4,678$ 99 Carport- 1st 500 sq ft each [1]1.00 2.80 1.20 0.50 0.00 5.50 871$ 523$ 60%827$ 95%16 8,107$ 13,496$ 12,821$ 100 Carport - each additional 500 sq ft each [1]0.50 1.40 0.50 0.00 0.00 2.40 364$ 290$ 80%346$ 95%208 60,366$ 75,797$ 72,007$ 101 Structural Calculation review (hourly) hourly [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%121 18,490$ 18,335$ 18,335$ 102 Re-inspection Fee (hourly) hourly [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%18 2,726$ 2,704$ 2,704$ 103 Plan Check (hourly)hourly [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%817 124,986$ 123,941$ 123,941$ 104 Inspection (hourly) hourly [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%589 90,171$ 89,417$ 89,417$ [4] SERVICES & ACTIVITIES 1 Plan Duplication Fee includes flash drive each [4]0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 76$ $ 47 62%76$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 Change of Address City Review hourly [3] [4]1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 653$ 610$ 93%653$ 100%-$ -$ -$ Recording and Mapping hourly [3] [4]1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 653$ 443$ 68%653$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Occupancy Inspection each [4]0.00 1.40 0.00 0.30 0.00 1.70 280$ 260$ 93%280$ 100%1 260$ 280$ 280$ 4 Sewer and Water each [4]2.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.70 410$ 412$ 101%410$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5 Hourly Minimum includes processing hourly [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 427$ 281%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 6 Public Art - Structural Review hourly [3] [4]1.00 0.70 0.00 0.50 0.50 2.70 433$ NEW %433$ 100%-$ -$ -$ MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING [2] Mechanical 1 HVAC system- residential each [4]0.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 HVAC system- ea. additional system each [4]0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 46$ 58$ 127%46$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Exhaust hood, vent fan, ventilation system, Heating unit, compressor, or Evaporative cooler Residential /commercial each each 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 290$ 76%360$ 95%-$ -$ -$ 4 Package unit or split system- residential each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5 Package unit or split system- ea. additional system each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 58$ 38%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 6 Ductwork only each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 7 Freezer/cooler- 1st 500 sq ft commercial each [4]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.00 491$ 484$ 98%491$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 8 Freezer/cooler- 501-50,000 sq ft commercial each [4]2.50 1.00 2.00 0.50 0.00 6.00 947$ 941$ 99%947$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 9 Freezer/cooler- 51,000 + sq ft commercial each [4]2.50 0.50 4.00 0.50 0.00 7.50 1,174$ 1,169$ 100%1,174$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 14 of 16Page 222 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 10 Type II hoods or other ventilation system - commercial each [4]1.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 4.00 643$ 635$ 99%643$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 11 Exhaust Hood- Type I -commercial each [4]1.50 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 7.00 1,098$ 865$ 79%1,098$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 12 Dust Collection System- commercial each 3.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 1,590$ 1,576$ 99%1,590$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 13 Cooling tower or heat exchange- commercial each 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 6.00 1,055$ 1,020$ 97%1,055$ 100%-$ -$ -$ MEC Insp Permits - All [5]0.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303.44$ 326$ 108%303$ 100%72 23,490$ 21,848$ 21,848$ Plumbing 1 Sewer /water service connection- residential each [4]0.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 190$ 191$ 101%190$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 Plumbing or gas fixtures -first 5 fixtures residential each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Plumbing or gas fixtures -each additional residential each [4]0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 38$ 39$ 103%38$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 4 Private sewage disposal system (new/altered- each residential)each [4]1.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 457$ 100%455$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5 Re-piping up to 20 fixtures - residential each [4]0.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 6 Water service line- residential each [4]0.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 190$ 191$ 101%190$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 7 Backflow preventer- first 5 residential each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 8 Backflow preventer- each additional each [4]0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 15$ 15$ 99%15$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 9 Water heater - each residential each [4]0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 91$ 153$ 168%91$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10 Tankless water heater- residential each [4]0.50 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 167$ 230$ 138%167$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 11 Graywater system - residential each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 12 Solar water system - residential each [4]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 13 Repair- Drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- Residential each [4]0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 14 Sewer connection - commercial each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 15 Plumbing or gas fixtures- first 5 commercial each [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 458$ 101%455$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 16 Plumbing or gas fixtures- each additional commercial each [4]1.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 190$ 191$ 101%190$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 17 Private sewage disposal system- commercial each [4]1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 455$ 458$ 101%455$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 18 Grease interceptor- commercial each [4]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 19 Backflow preventer- commercial each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 20 Solar water system - commercial each [4]4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 910$ 914$ 100%910$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 21 Graywater system - commercial each [4]0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 22 Medical Gas system each [4]3.00 1.25 3.00 0.00 0.00 7.25 1,100$ 1,105$ 100%1,100$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 23 Repair drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- commercial each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 24 Water heater- commercial each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 25 Tankless water heater - commercial each [4]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%-$ -$ -$ PLM Insp Permits - All [5]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 227.58$ 228$ 100%228$ 100%118 26,881$ 26,855$ 26,855$ Electrical 1 Outdoor events- carnival rides, electric generators each 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 Meter pedestal each [4]0.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 190$ 191$ 101%190$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Electrical for alumawood patio cover/ enclosure - 1-10 lights, outlets, switches each [4]0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 76$ 75$ 99%76$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 4 Temporary power pole meter panel (each) each [4]0.50 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 167$ 230$ 138%167$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5 Temporary power pole- distribution panel (each)each [4]0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 76$ 77$ 102%76$ 100%-$ -$ -$ NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 15 of 16Page 223 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.2 BLDG PC BLDG & FIRE INSP BLDG PC FIRE PLNG ENG $ 152 $ 152 $ 152 $ 224 $ 125 Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours)Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommen ded Fee Level / Deposit Recomme nded Cost Recovery % Estimated Volume of Activity Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee 6 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures - first 10 each [4]0.50 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 167$ 230$ 138%167$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 7 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures -each additional fixture each [4]0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 38$ 16$ 42%38$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 8 Appliances, apparatus- residential each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 9 Appliances, apparatus- Commercial each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 10 Motors, generators- residential each [4]0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 228$ 230$ 101%228$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 11 Motors, generators, transformer- commercial each [4]1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 379$ 380$ 100%379$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 12 Electrical service less than 400 amp - commercial each [4]1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 303$ 152$ 50%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 13 Electrical service panel 401 amp - 1200 amp- commercial each [4]2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 531$ 533$ 100%531$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 14 Electrical service panel over 1200 amp- commercial each [4]3.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 759$ 762$ 100%759$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 15 Conduits for future use up to 500'each [4]0.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 190$ 191$ 101%190$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 16 Conduits for future use each add 'l 500'each [4]0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 76$ 75$ 99%76$ 100%-$ -$ -$ ELE Insp Permits - All [5]0.73 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 250.81$ 212$ 85%251$ 100%353 74,907$ 88,537$ 88,537$ MEP MISCELLANEOUS 1 MEP fee (hourly) includes re-inspection fee hourly [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%1 153$ 152$ 152$ 2 MEP Plan check (hourly) hourly [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%1 153$ 152$ 152$ 3 MEP Plan check by engineer hourly [4]1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 153$ 101%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 4 General Plan Maintenance Fee surcharge 10% on top of selected planning application s and building permits 10% on top of selected planning application s and building permits 5 Technology Fee surcharge 7%7% Fees for services not listed will be determined on a case- by-case basis. Fee will be based on the fully burdened hourly rate at the time of service provided. TOTAL 3,325,892$ 3,480,607$ 3,466,754$ [Notes] [1]If structural calculations are submitted a calculation review will be assessed in addition to the base fee. [2]If combo permits stack up and exceed the remodel fee, we use the remodel fee instead of a combo of MPEs [3]Fees includes multiple department reviews [4]Not subject to the General Plan Maintenance Fee [5]Shown for analysis purposes only. Should not be adopted / published as a fee for service. NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COS, Page 16 of 16Page 224 Prepared by NBS for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX A.3 Cost of Service Analysis – Building and Safety Department – Fire Fees Page 225 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.3 BUILDING PLAN CHECK BUILDING INSPECTION FIRE CONSTRUCTION FEE SCHEDULE 1 Fire Sprinkler Systems for New Construction [2] 1-20 Heads per floor or system 1.00 1.00 2.00 152$ 303$ 534$ 176%303$ 100%30 16,020$ 9,103$ 9,103$ 21-100 Heads per floor or system 2.00 3.00 5.00 152$ 759$ 914$ 120%759$ 100%30 27,420$ 22,758$ 22,758$ 101-200 Heads per floor or system 2.50 3.50 6.00 152$ 910$ 1,067$ 117%910$ 100%12 12,804$ 10,924$ 10,924$ 201-350 Heads per floor or system 3.00 4.00 7.00 152$ 1,062$ 1,120$ 105%1,062$ 100%2 2,240$ 2,124$ 2,124$ 351+ Heads per floor or system 3.50 5.00 8.50 152$ 1,290$ 1,448$ 112%1,290$ 100%13 18,824$ 16,765$ 16,765$ 2 Fire Sprinkler Systems (Production - SFR Tract Homes and Multi-Family)[2] 1-20 Heads per floor or system 0.00 1.00 1.00 152$ 152$ 304$ 200%152$ 100%17 5,168$ 2,579$ 2,579$ 21-100 Heads per floor or system 0.00 3.00 3.00 152$ 455$ 610$ 134%455$ 100%3 1,830$ 1,365$ 1,365$ 101-200 Heads per floor or system 0.00 3.50 3.50 152$ 531$ 686$ 129%531$ 100%- -$ -$ -$ 201-350 Heads per floor or system 0.00 4.00 4.00 152$ 607$ 762$ 126%607$ 100%16 12,192$ 9,710$ 9,710$ 351+ Heads per floor or system 0.00 5.00 5.00 152$ 759$ 914$ 120%759$ 100%4 3,656$ 3,034$ 3,034$ 3 Fire Sprinkler Tenant Improvements (Commercial) [2] 1-4 Heads per floor or system 1.00 1.00 2.00 152$ 303$ 458$ 151%303$ 100%32 14,656$ 9,710$ 9,710$ 5-20 Heads per floor or system 1.50 1.50 3.00 152$ 455$ 610$ 134%455$ 100%20 12,200$ 9,103$ 9,103$ 21-100 Heads per floor or system 2.00 2.00 4.00 152$ 607$ 762$ 126%607$ 100%- -$ -$ -$ 101-200 Heads per floor or system 2.50 2.50 5.00 152$ 759$ 914$ 120%759$ 100%9 8,226$ 6,827$ 6,827$ 201-350 Heads per floor or system 3.00 3.00 6.00 152$ 910$ 1,067$ 117%910$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 351+ Heads per floor or system 4.00 4.00 8.00 152$ 1,214$ 1,371$ 113%1,214$ 100%2 2,742$ 2,428$ 2,428$ Miscellaneous Fire Sprinkler and Underground Work 1 Standard Hourly Rate minimum 1.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 152$ 154$ 102%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 2 Hydraulic Calculation per remote area [2]1.00 0.00 1.00 152$ 152$ 154$ 102%152$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 3 Dry Pipe Valve per valve -$ -$ 4 Private Underground Fire Service First 1-5 per outlet/ hydrant riser 2.00 3.00 5.00 152$ 759$ 762$ 100%759$ 100%-$ -$ -$ Each Additional per outlet/ hydrant riser 1.00 1.00 2.00 152$ 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ 5 Public Underground Fire Service First 1-5 DCDA./ hydrant 2.00 3.00 5.00 152$ 759$ 762$ 100%759$ 100%-$ -$ -$ Each Additional DCDA./ hydrant 1.00 1.00 2.00 152$ 303$ 304$ 100%303$ 100%-$ -$ -$ Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee Estimated Volume of Activity Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) FBHR Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommended Fee Level / Deposit Recommended Cost Recovery % Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Building Fire Fees COS, Page 1 of 2Page 226 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX A.3 BUILDING PLAN CHECK BUILDING INSPECTION Annual Estimated Revenues at Full Cost Recovery Fee Annual Estimated Revenues at Recommende d Fee Estimated Volume of Activity Activity Service Cost Analysis Cost Recovery Analysis Annual Estimated Revenue Analysis Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type NotesEstimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) Estimated Average Labor Time Per Activity (hours) FBHR Cost of Service Per Activity Current Fee / Deposit Existing Cost Recovery % Recommended Fee Level / Deposit Recommended Cost Recovery % Annual Estimated Revenues at Current Fee 6 Deluge / Pre-Action per valve [5]1,067$ 1,067$ 7 Fire Pump per pump [5]1,144$ 1,144$ 8 Gravity per tank [5]914$ 914$ 9 Pressure per tank [5]914$ 914$ 10 Call I, II, & III Stand Pipe per outlet [5]304$ 304$ 11 Fire Alarm and Sprinkler Monitoring System 0-15 Devices per system 2.50 3.00 5.50 152$ 834$ 416$ 50%834$ 100%10 4,160$ 8,345$ 8,345$ 16-50 Devices per system 3.50 4.00 7.50 152$ 1,138$ 566$ 50%1,138$ 100%2 1,132$ 2,276$ 2,276$ 51-100 Devices per system 4.50 5.00 9.50 152$ 1,441$ 717$ 50%1,441$ 100%133 95,361$ 191,699$ 191,699$ 101-500 Devices per system 8.50 6.00 14.50 152$ 2,200$ 1,094$ 50%2,200$ 100%30 32,820$ 65,999$ 65,999$ each additional 25 Devices per system 0.50 0.70 1.20 152$ 182$ 89$ 49%182$ 100%102 9,078$ 18,571$ 18,571$ Miscellaneous Fire Systems, Equipment and Tanks 1 Standard Hourly Rate minimum [5]154$ 154$ 2 Clean Agent Gas Systems each [5]1,067$ 1,067$ 3 Dry Chemical Systems each [5]914$ 914$ 4 Wet Chemical / Kitchen Hood each [5]610$ 610$ 5 Foam Systems each [5]610$ 610$ 6 Misc. FD Access per hour [5]154$ 154$ 7 Refrigerant Monitoring System each [5]914$ 914$ Reports 1 High Pile Storage 500 - 25,000 sq ft each [5]1,067$ 1,067$ 25,001 - 100,000 sq ft each [5]1,372$ 1,372$ Each additional 100,000 sq ft each [5]304$ 304$ 2 Life Safety and FPP per hour [5]154$ 154$ 3 Hazardous Material Inventory Statement (HMIS) per hour [5]154$ 154$ 4 Hazardous Material Management Plan (HMMP)per hour [5]154$ 154$ 5 Re-Inspection Fee per hour [5]154$ 154$ Fees for services not listed will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Fee will be based on the fully burdened hourly rate at the time of service provided. TOTAL 280,529 393,321 393,321 [Notes] [1] For all multi-story projects, the fire sprinkler fee is calculated per floor based on the number of heads on that floor and the number of hydraulic calculation areas. [2] Please add the fee for each Hydraulic Calculation area from the Miscellaneous Fire Sprinkler and Underground Work to each floor/per head fees to estimate the total plan check and permit fees. [3] [4] The Total Fee breakdown consist of a Technology Fee plus Plan Review & Inspection Fees (57% Plan Review + 43% Inspection). [5] Fees are established by the Fire District The above fees cover typical projects. The fees for certain unique projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building & Safety Services Director and/or Fire District. It will be based on the overhead cost and the time of service provided at the hourly rate. NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Building Fire Fees COS, Page 2 of 2Page 227 Prepared by NBS for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX B.1 Comparative Fee Survey – Planning Department Page 228 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES [*] 1 Additional Hearing Required PER HEARING $ 2,461 2,429$ no comparison no comparison Renotice required: $1,990 No renotice: $1,700 no comparison no comparison 2 Adult Entertainment Permit DEPOSIT [5] $ 10,000 24,521$ no comparison $ 6,615 $ 6,980 no comparison no comparison 3 Annexation DEPOSIT [5] $ 15,000 77,139$ no comparison $5,782 + LAFCO fees $ 9,870 no comparison Prezone w. Annexation: $12,190 4 Appeal of a Planning Commission decision FLAT $ 3,014 19,892$ Item: $4,320 Item(SFR): $3,070 $ 964 Resident $0 Applicant and All others: $3,667 5 Appeal of Planning Director decision FLAT $ 1,584 8,723$ no comparison no comparison no comparison 6 Business License Review FLAT [4] $ 82 81$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 7 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee FLAT NEW 405$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 8 Certificate of Appropriateness Residential FLAT $ 2,644 7,514$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison All Others FLAT $ 7,599 7,514$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 9 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit Administrative Approval FLAT [1] $ 4,316 5,218$ PC Approval FLAT $ 7,629 9,308$ CC Approval FLAT $ 9,612 9,308$ 10 Conditional Use Permit / Minor Use Permit - Modification Administrative Approval FLAT 50% of the original fee 2,649$ PC Approval FLAT $ 3,936 4,694$ CC Approval FLAT $ 5,919 4,614$ 11 County Recording Fee FLAT [4] Actual Cost no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 4 no comparison 12 Courtesy Review FLAT $ 1,601 1,994$ no comparison no comparison $ 2,620 no comparison no comparison 13 Development Agreement DEPOSIT [5] $ 50,000 69,196$ $ 10,000 Cost + G&A w. $10,000 min deposit Deposit Varies - no comparison $30,000 deposit + hourly Processing: Actual Cost + City Attorney and Staff time 14 Development Agreement - Modification DEPOSIT [5] $ 25,000 26,881$ $ 7,500 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 15 Density Bonus Agreement DEPOSIT [5] $ 10,000 69,196$ no comparison $ 6,284 Deposit Varies - no comparison no comparison no comparison 16 Density Bonus Agreement- Modification DEPOSIT [5] $ 25,000 26,881$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 17 Development Code Amendment DEPOSIT [5] $ 10,000 16,808$ $ 2,000 $ 12,292 no comparison no comparison no comparison 18 ENHCP Specific Plan Recovery Fee Neighborhood Area Residential (per unit)FLAT [6][8] $ 1,246 Rural Conservation Area Residential (per unit)FLAT [6] $ 2,166 Commercial/Other non-residential (per sq. ft.)FLAT [6] $ 0.31 Special Conditional Use permit Residential: $1,504 Commercial: $4,689 $ 3,648 $882 - $6,504+$54/acre depending on permit type $ 4,530 no comparison Special Conditional Use permit modification: $3,641 Homeowner: $130 Other: $902 $65% of original filing fee $485 max Homeowner: $1,762.45 Nonprofit: $2,691.60 Other: $5,900 $882 - $6,504+$54/acre depending on permit type $ 4,530 $10,331 deposit + hourly no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 1 of 6Page 229 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 19 Entertainment Permit Administrative Approval FLAT $ 4,316 5,881$ PC Approval FLAT $ 8,603 8,918$ 20 Entertainment Permit - Modification Administrative Approval FLAT $ 2,159 2,530$ PC Approval FLAT $ 4,298 4,049$ 21 Entertainment Permit- Annual Renewal FLAT $ 638 2,913$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 22 Environmental/CEQA Review - Exemption FLAT $ 103 101$ no comparison $ 385 $ 820 no comparison no comparison 23 Environmental Impact Report City Administrative Processing DEPOSIT [5] $ 45,000 87,818$ Consultant Cost DEPOSIT Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] Actual Cost 24 Other Environmental Review (Non-EIR) City Administrative Processing DEPOSIT [6] [5] $ 4,301 16,195$ Consultant Cost DEPOSIT Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] Actual Cost 25 Film Permit FLAT [4] $ 348 1,034$ $ 246 no comparison $ 1,090 no comparison no comparison 26 General Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5] $ 25,000 24,164$ Text: $5,000 Map: $7,500 <10 acres: $7,276 >10 acres: $9,619 $ 5,910 $15,832 deposit + hourly Map: $6,517 Text: $6,008 27 Hillside Design Review 1 Unit FLAT $ 9,242 10,317$ 2 - 4 Units DEPOSIT [5] $ 12,000 18,401$ 5+ Units DEPOSIT [5] $ 20,000 31,476$ 28 Home Occupation Permit FLAT [4] $ 103 101$ no comparison $ 275 $ 260 no comparison $ 283 29 Land Use Verification Report FLAT [4] $ 821 810$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 30 Landmark Application FLAT No Charge 8,443$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 31 Landscape Plan Review - New Development Reviewed by City Staff FLAT $ 1,663 1,798$ no comparison City Administrative Processing Fee - Facilitation of Consultant FLAT $ 358 354$ no comparison Consultant Cost FLAT Actual Cost no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 10,000 Applicant initiated: Deposit: $2,000 plus actual cost + 25% admin City Staff initiated: Deposit: $5,000 plus actual cost + 25% admin $ 10,000 Contract + 18% $ 3,839 $ 3,155 no comparison $ 5,000 Initial study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: $16,621 deposit Negative Declaration & Mitigated Negative Declaration: $2,764 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 1,510 Construction Plans: $916 Conceptual Plans. /Minor admin review: $165 Plus consultant cost NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 2 of 6Page 230 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 32 Major Design Review Single Family Residential 5 - 10 Units FLAT $ 16,411 16,892$ $ 7,909 11 - 25 Units FLAT $ 21,669 22,028$ 11-50 DU: $9,150 + $44/du >10 26+ Units FLAT $ 30,696 31,227$ 50+ DU: $10,060 + $22/DU Multi-Family Residential 2- 10 Units FLAT $ 16,564 17,402$ $ 7,909 11 - 75 Units FLAT $ 22,211 22,925$ 11-50 DU: $9,150 + $44/du >10 76+ Units FLAT $ 32,968 33,734$ 50+ DU: $10,060 + $22/DU Commercial Uses 0 - 50,000 Square Feet FLAT $ 15,958 16,809$ < 1 acre: $7,386 50,001 - 150,000 Square Feet FLAT $ 22,021 22,802$ 1-20 acres: $8,356 + $330/acre 150,001+ Square Feet FLAT $ 33,783 34,650$ >20 acres: $12,044 + $110/acre Industrial Zones 0 - 150,000 Square Feet FLAT $ 15,426 16,283$ < 1 acre: $7,386 150,001 - 300,000 Square Feet FLAT $ 19,934 20,620$ 1-20 acres: $8,356 + $330/acre 300,001+ Square Feet FLAT $ 26,001 26,728$ >20 acres: $12,044 + $110/acre Mixed Use Zones FLAT $ 33,783 43,087$ no comparison 33 Major Design Review - Modification FLAT [1] Administrative Approval FLAT 50% of original application 1,620$ PC Approval FLAT 50% of original application 2,429$ CC Approval FLAT 50% of original application 3,037$ 34 Massage Business Permit FLAT $ 3,649 3,625$ $ 2,127 $ 995 no comparison no comparison 35 Massage Business Permit – Ancillary FLAT $ 1,209 2,410$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 36 Massage Business Permit – Annual Renewal FLAT $ 638 997$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 37 Mills Act Application FLAT No Charge 5,402$ no comparison no comparison $ 1,450 no comparison no comparison 38 Minor Design Review Residential FLAT $ 3,637 6,518$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT $ 5,642 9,535$ 39 Minor Design Review - Modification Residential FLAT $ 1,742 2,434$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT $ 2,903 3,750$ 40 Minor Exception Administrative Approval - Resident FLAT $ 871 3,698$ Administrative Approval - All Other FLAT $ 2,888 3,158$ PC Approval FLAT $ 4,660 5,884$ 41 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program FLAT $ 1,025 1,012$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 948 no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 142 no comparison no comparison Major Development Review $9,555 deposit + hourly Design Review Board in conjunction with development application: $2,673 plus actual staff time for DRB no comparison no comparison $ 750 Minor Development Review $4,626 deposit + hourly no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 3 of 6Page 231 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 42 Planning Department Hourly Rate HOURLY $ 204 202$ no comparison $59.59-$168.96 depending on position no comparison no comparison no comparison 43 Property Ownership List 100 feet or less (small application)FLAT [4] No Charge 20$ 101-660 feet (standard)FLAT [4] $ 96 40$ over 660 feet (custom)FLAT [4] $ 144 81$ 44 Public Art Fee Residential (per unit)FLAT [6][8] $ 750 Commercial/Industrial (per sq.ft.)FLAT [6] $ 1 45 Public Convenience or Necessity (ABC License) FLAT $ 4,283 4,200$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 46 Public Noticing [3] Staff Time - small mailer (< 200)FLAT $ 204 405$ Staff Time - Large mailer (200 +)FLAT NEW 810$ Advertising - Actual Cost FLAT $ 630 47 SB 330 Preliminary Application Fee FLAT NEW 607$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 48 Sign Permit FLAT [4] $ 246 243$ $ 243 no comparison Temp Sign Permit Real Estate/subdivision/construc tion: $560 Sales Promotion/Comm Activity signs: $220 no comparison Sign Plan Review: $300 49 Similar Use Determination FLAT $ 4,594 4,535$ no comparison no comparison $ 1,050 no comparison no comparison 50 Site Development Review $ - Residential FLAT $ 755 1,975$ Commercial / Industrial FLAT $ 2,272 2,831$ 51 Specific Plan - New DEPOSIT [5] $ 50,000 43,489$ no comparison - deposit varies $ 20,000 $9,540 each $28,992 deposit + hourly no comparison 52 Specific Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5] $ 10,000 14,171$ no comparison - deposit varies $ 5,000 $4,050 each $23,809 deposit + hourly $ 7,859 53 Master Plan - New DEPOSIT [5] $ 40,000 43,489$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 54 Master Plan Amendment DEPOSIT [5] $ 10,000 14,171$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 55 Street Name Change FLAT $ 8,938 8,828$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 56 Technical Report Review City Administrative Processing Fee FLAT [6] $ 1,641 1,620$ Consultant Cost FLAT [6] Actual Cost City Attorney Fee DEPOSIT [2] Actual Cost 57 Temporary Use Permit Model Home Sales Office / Temporary Offices FLAT $ 3,194 3,994$ $ 2,500 Non-Profit FLAT $ 215 2,134$ $ 98 Residential (non-commercial) Haunted Houses FLAT No Charge 2,134$ no comparison All Others FLAT $ 610 2,134$ no comparison 58 Tentative Parcel Map FLAT $ 7,558 7,367$ $ 6,560 $7,204 + $110/Acre $ 6,700 $15,000 deposit + hourly $6,080 + $16 per lot 59 Tentative Parcel Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification)FLAT $ 3,452 3,354$ $ 4,211 $ 5,677 no comparison $5,000 deposit + hourly no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Valuation X .1% no comparison Newspaper - pass through $192 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 4,370 Minor: $4,626 deposit Major: $9,555 plus hourly no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Interim uses: $828.20 Special event: $492.00 Regular: $810 POD: $65 $666 deposit + hourly no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 4 of 6Page 232 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 60 Tentative Tract Map 5 - 10 lots FLAT $ 9,947 9,677$ 11 - 25 lots FLAT $ 12,272 11,923$ 26+ lots DEPOSIT [5] $ 15,000 17,801$ 61 Tentative Tract Map - Review for Substantial Conformance (Modification) FLAT $ 5,755 5,557$ $ 3,088 Minor: $2,646 Major: $4,740 no comparison $5,000 deposit + hourly no comparison 62 Third and subsequent submittal review FLAT [1] $1,580 or 20% of the original application fee, whichever is less 1,579$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 63 Time Extension Administrative Approval FLAT $ 2,567 2,617$ PC Approval FLAT $ 8,596 8,675$ 64 Trail Easement Vacation FLAT $ 6,857 15,955$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 65 Transfer of Development Rights FLAT $ 2,957 1,113$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 66 Tree Removal Permits Single Family Residential Live Trees FLAT $ 203 422$ Dead Trees (No Charge)FLAT No Charge 422$ Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial Administrative Approval up to 4 trees FLAT $ 943 929$ Administrative Approval 5 or more trees FLAT $ 1,702 1,678$ New Development 1 - 10 trees FLAT $ 2,174 2,143$ 11 - 20 trees FLAT $ 3,097 3,054$ 21+ trees FLAT $ 4,224 4,168$ Processing fee for tree removed with no permit FLAT NEW 304$ 67 Tribal Consultation FLAT [5] $ 1,500 2,024$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 68 Uniform Sign Program FLAT [4] $ 4,573 4,514$ no comparison $ 1,530 Sign Program: $1,237 Deposit + Hourly Sign Program Review: $901 69 Uniform Sign Program Modification FLAT [4] $ 2,067 2,551$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 70 Variance FLAT $ 5,006 6,378$ Admin exception or Minor: $2,421 Homeowner: $306.03 Other: $3,465.31 $ 3,609 $ 4,510 $3,750 deposit + hourly Zone Ordinance Variance Owner: $210 All Others: $4,205 71 Zoning Map Amendment FLAT [7] $ 12,830 15,831$ no comparison - deposit varies Zone Change 0-5 acres: $6,696 >5 acres: $7,607 + $54/acre Zone Change $6,170 each Zone Change $13,610 deposit + hourly Zone Change Review: $7,252 Base: $9685.90 per lot: $65 Residential 1-100 lots: $8,240+$32/lot Residential >100 lots: $11,300 + $54/ac P.U.D. 1-100 lots: $7,689 + $164/acre P.U.D, > 100 lots: $10,473+$164/acre Comm/Indust >100 lots: $10,611 + $110/acre $ 8,180 $22,661 deposit + hourly $8,091 + $16 per lot Admin approval: $852.44 Commission approval: $8,898.70 no comparison 50% of orig fee $ 750 $5,343 deposit + hourly W/O DRC Review: $198 W/DRC Review: $1,270 Discretionary Review-PC Review : $1,724 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 5 of 6Page 233 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.1 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Type (Flat / Deposit / Hourly)Notes Current Fee /Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 73 General Plan Maintenance Fee surcharge 10% on top of selected planning applications and building permits Advanced Long Range Planning Fee: 5% of all building permits and Planning applications no comparison General plan update fee: 7% no comparison General Plan Update fee .05% of the job valuation 74 Technology Fee surcharge 7% REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS [*] 1 On-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign DEPOSIT [6] $ 706 2 Off-Site Subdivision sign cash deposit per sign DEPOSIT [6] $ 706 3 Notice of Filing Sign (per sign)DEPOSIT [6] $ 971 4 Temporary Use Permit Model Home Restoration Deposit DEPOSIT [6] $ 883 TOTAL [Notes] [1] Source data from: "Ontario_FY 2023-24 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule_0.pdf" [2] Source data from: "Fontana_FY23-24 User Fee Report.pdf" [3] Source data from: "City of Upland Master Fee Schedule-Effective 08.01.22.pdf" [4] Source data from: "Eastvale FY21-22_User Fee Schedule.pdf" [5] Source data from: "Chino_2023 Planning Fee Schedule-FINAL.pdf" no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/22/2023 Planning COMP,Page 6 of 6Page 234 Prepared by NBS for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX B.2 Comparative Fee Survey – Building and Safety Department Page 235 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES 1 Processing Fee [2] Residential - Routed each 304$ 303$ Residential - Non-routed each 79$ 121$ Commercial - Routed each 380$ 379$ Commercial - Non-routed each 153$ 152$ No Plan Check Required Processing each 146$ 38$ COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION, ADDITIONS, AND TENANT IMPROVMENTS (Includes all associated MEP's) A Class 1 With food and/or drink New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,531$ 1,517$ $1,238 / $1,461 $9,720 / $7,248 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,050$ 2,185$ $1,689 / $2,320 $9,720 / $7,248 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.2,720$ 2,701$ $1,689 / $2,523 $9,720 / $7,248 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,466$ 3,384$ $2,954 / $3,993 $9,720 / $8,239 2 Without food and/or drink New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,226$ 1,366$ $1,238 / $1,461 $9,720 / $7,248 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,720$ 1,897$ $1,689 / $2,320 $9,720 / $7,248 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.2,581$ 2,716$ $1,689 / $2,523 $9,720 / $7,248 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,100$ 3,080$ $2,954 / $3,993 $9,720 / $8,239 3 With food and/or drink over 300 New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 2,000 base fee up to 2,000 s.f.2,277$ 2,291$ $1,689 / $2,320 $9,720 / $7,248 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,710$ 3,626$ $2,954 / $3,993 $9,720 / $8,239 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.4,685$ 4,628$ $3,856 / $5,099 $11,702 / $9,412 4 Without food and/or drink over 300 New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 2,000 base fee up to 2,000 s.f.1,683$ 1,821$ $1,689 / $2,320 $9,720 / $7,248 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,040$ 3,171$ $2,954 / $3,993 $9,720 / $8,239 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.4,014$ 4,142$ $3,856 / $5,099 $11,702 / $9,412 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee MEP Issuance Fee: $41 MEP Issuance Fee: $45 MEP Issuance Fee: $147 MEP Issuance Fee: $49 Electrical: $22 Mechanical: $42 Plumbing: $52 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 1 of 13Page 236 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] B Class 1 Office and Public Buildings New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.937$ 956$ $1,238 / $1,461 $6,257 / $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,150$ 1,146$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,257 / $3,785 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.1,820$ 1,601$ $1,689 / $2,523 $6,257 / $3,785 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.2,186$ 1,980$ $2,954 / $3,993 $7,248 / $4,525 2 Service New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,241$ 1,229$ $1,238 / $1,461 $6,257 / $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,455$ 1,593$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,257 / $3,785 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.1,973$ 1,957$ $1,689 / $2,523 $6,257 / $3,785 3 Medical New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,912$ 2,048$ $1,238 / $1,461 $6,257 / $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,581$ 2,716$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,257 / $3,785 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,557$ 3,687$ $1,689 / $2,523 $6,257 / $3,785 4 Restaurant New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,531$ 1,639$ $1,238 / $1,461 $6,257 / $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,049$ 2,185$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,257 / $3,785 3,500 base fee up to 3,500 s.f.2,490$ 2,625$ $1,689 / $2,523 $6,257 / $3,785 5 Laboratories New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2,217$ 2,352$ $1,238 / $1,461 $6,257 / $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,507$ 2,640$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,257 / $3,785 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,253$ 3,384$ $1,689 / $2,523 $6,257 / $3,785 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 2 of 13Page 237 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] E Class 1 Day Care / Private School New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2,003$ 2,139$ $1,442 / $1,665 $6,508 / $4,969 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,811$ 2,944$ $2,709 / $3,340 $6,508 / $4,969 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,557$ 3,687$ $2,709 / $3,543 $6,508 / $4,969 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,381$ 4,506$ $3,362 / $4,401 $7,499 / $6,212 F Class 1 Industrial / Manufacturing F1/F2 New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,698$ 1,836$ $1,689 / $2,320 $6,005 / $4,525 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.2,186$ 2,322$ $2,954 / $3,993 $7,248 / $5,369 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.2,856$ 2,989$ $3,856 / $5,099 $8,239 / $7,248 H Class 1 H1, H2, H3, H4, H5 New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.3,191$ 3,323$ $3,652 / $4,283 $ 5,265 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,319$ 4,446$ $5,002 / $6,041 $ 6,257 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.5,751$ 5,872$ $6,761 / $8,004 $ 7,988 I Class 1 All I classifications New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,912$ 2,048$ $2,122 / $2,345 $10,249 / $6,405 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,659$ 2,792$ $2,880 / $3,511 $10,249 / $6,405 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,405$ 3,535$ $2,880 / $3,714 $10,249 / $6,405 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,381$ 4,506$ $3,328 / $4,367 $11,241 / $7,145 M Class 1 Retail New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.937$ 1,942$ $2,020 / $2,243 $6,019 / $5,279 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,302$ 2,777$ $2,920 / $3,551 $6,019 / $5,279 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.1,901$ 3,990$ $4,187 / $5,226 $7,010 / $6,270 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.2,643$ 5,432$ $5,741 / $7,186 $10,487 / $9,244 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.3,466$ 7,783$ $6,642 / $8,291 $14,487 / $14,244 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 3 of 13Page 238 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] S Class 1 S1/S2 Warehouses New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.982$ 4,142$ $4,375 / $5,414 $8,239 / $4,777 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.1,287$ 5,022$ $5,284 / $6,729 $11,465 - $8,401 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.1,576$ 8,239$ $9,534 / $11,388 $23,465 - $24,401 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.2,065$ 10,059$ $11,358 / $13,416 $38,465 - $44,401 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.2,489$ 13,382$ $14,100 / $16,993 $68,465 - $84,401 2 S1 Mini Storage New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,165$ 1,305$ $3,774 / $4,405 $6,997 - $3,785 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.1,760$ 1,897$ $4,375 / $5,414 $8,239 - $4,777 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.2,430$ 2,564$ $5,284 / $6,527 $9,231 - $6,167 3 S1 Parking Garages (open or closed) New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.1,760$ 4,142$ $4,375 / $5,414 $8,239 / $4,777 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.NEW 5,037$ $5,284 / $6,729 $11,465 - $8,401 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.NEW 8,512$ $9,534 / $11,388 $23,465 - $24,401 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.NEW 10,659$ $11,358 / $13,416 $38,465 - $44,401 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.NEW 13,420$ $14,100 / $16,993 $68,465 - $84,401 3 S1 Repair Garage New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,698$ 1,836$ $3,172 / $3,395 $6,997 - $3,785 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,689$ 2,822$ $3,774 / $4,405 $8,239 - $4,777 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,359$ 3,490$ $4,021 / $4,855 $9,231 - $6,167 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 4 of 13Page 239 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 4 Shells only- Types I-V not including buildout New Con.,Additions etc. / TI Depends on Type [6]/[7] 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.2,490$ 3,763$ $4,375 / $5,414 $8,239 / $4,777 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.3,477$ 4,772$ $5,284 / $6,729 $11,465 - $8,401 250,000 base fee up to 250,000 s.f.4,361$ 9,066$ $9,534 / $11,388 $23,465 - $24,401 500,000 base fee up to 500,000 s.f.5,347$ 10,151$ $11,358 / $13,416 $38,465 - $44,401 1,000,000 base fee up to 1,000,000 s.f.6,535$ 14,369$ $14,100 / $16,993 $68,465 - $84,401 RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION (Includes all associated MEP's) R Class 1 R1/R2 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,718$ 1,783$ $ 1,175 $13,264 / $16,999 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,601$ 2,663$ $ 2,586 $13,264 / $16,999 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,521$ 4,749$ $ 4,932 $14,571 / $18,494 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.6,837$ 7,503$ $ 9,821 $18,763 / $23,481 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.9,458$ 11,516$ $ 12,586 $23,763 / $28,981 2 R1/R2 Major Remodels 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,657$ 1,722$ $ 1,175 $13,264 / $16,999 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,845$ 2,906$ $ 2,586 $13,264 / $16,999 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,034$ 4,726$ $ 4,932 $14,571 / $18,494 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.5,984$ 7,503$ $ 9,821 $18,763 / $23,481 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.8,666$ 11,365$ $ 12,586 $23,763 / $28,981 3 R2 Production Rate 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,169$ 933$ $ 2,586 $ 16,999 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.2,023$ 1,692$ $ 4,932 $ 18,494 20,000 base fee up to 20,000 s.f.2,662$ 2,299$ $ 6,969 $ 20,240 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 5 of 13Page 240 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 4 R2.1 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2,235$ 2,299$ $ 1,175 $ 16,999 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,815$ 2,875$ $ 2,586 $ 16,999 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,734$ 4,961$ $ 4,932 $ 18,494 50,000 base fee up to 50,000 s.f.7,050$ 7,503$ $ 9,821 $ 23,481 100,000 base fee up to 100,000 s.f.9,366$ 11,213$ $ 12,586 $ 28,981 5 R3 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,873$ 1,912$ $ 1,175 $ 5,094 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,879$ 2,701$ $ 2,586 $ 5,730 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.4,189$ 3,809$ $ 3,789 $ 6,366 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,034$ 4,340$ $ 4,932 $ 6,366 6 R3 Production Rate 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,172$ 1,457$ $ 1,175 $ 5,094 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.1,903$ 1,882$ $ 2,586 $ 5,730 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.2,392$ 2,367$ $ 3,789 $ 6,366 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,184$ 2,974$ $ 4,932 $ 6,366 7 R3/R4 Change of Occupancy (Build-Out Only) 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,504$ 1,570$ $ 1,175 $ 5,094 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,023$ 2,086$ $ 2,586 $ 5,730 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.2,845$ 2,906$ $ 3,789 $ 6,366 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.3,059$ 3,118$ $ 4,932 $ 6,366 8 R3 Accessory Dwelling Unit 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.1,568$ 1,609$ $ 1,175 $ 5,094 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,574$ 2,398$ $ 2,586 $ 5,730 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 6 of 13Page 241 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 9 R4 500 base fee up to 500 s.f.2,235$ 2,299$ $ 1,175 2,500 base fee up to 2,500 s.f.2,815$ 2,875$ $ 2,586 5,000 base fee up to 5,000 s.f.3,465$ 2,906$ $ 3,789 10,000 base fee up to 10,000 s.f.4,734$ 4,787$ $ 4,932 MINOR IMPROVEMENTS/ MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1 Antenna each 682$ 689$ no comparison no comparison 2 New Cell tower w/equipment shelter each [1]2,137$ 2,157$ up to 150 f.t.: $336 $ 2,582 3 Cell Site modification each 544$ 438$ up to 150 f.t.: $336 4 Tent or awning w/sides- 200-400 sq ft each [1]220$ 364$ $ 213 5 Tent/awning - 401 + sq ft each [1]290$ 470$ $ 213 6 Balcony/Deck - first 500 sq ft each [1]682$ 491$ 7 Balcony/Deck - each additional 500 sq ft each [1]468$ 476$ 8 Demolition Residential each 671$ 447$ 9 Demolition multi family/commercial each 458$ 462$ 10 Shoring each 244$ 243$ no comparison no comparison 11 Wall opening (windows/doors) new/altered Retrofit windows 1-5 windows each [1]151$ 416$ 1-6 windows: $181 Retrofit windows 6-15 windows each [1]301$ 491$ Retrofit windows 16 + windows - hourly each [1]151$ 643$ New Construction 1-5 windows each [1]301$ 416$ New Construction 6-15 windows each [1]452$ 491$ New Construction 16 + windows - hourly each [1]151$ 643$ 12 Dock levelers each [1]534$ 538$ up to 10, each: $243 11+, each: $258 13 Block wall 3-6 ft high - 1st 100 linear ft. each [1]406$ 416$ Each add 'l 50 linear ft each [1]106$ 106$ 14 Masonry pilasters - 1- 10 each [1]183$ 182$ 15 Fence(wood, wrought iron, chain link) over 6' high each [1]406$ 537$ 16 Fire place- masonry each [1]737$ 750$ 17 Fire place pre fab metal each 518$ 522$ 18 Flagpole over 20' high each [1]427$ 431$ 19 Garage First 500 sq ft each 895$ 795$ 20 Garage each additional 500 sq ft each 328$ 326$ no comparison no comparison $ 1,252 no comparison - based on valuation no comparison Window Upgrade: $406 no comparison - based on valuation PC 80% of permit fee no comparison no comparison - Permits for new construction (such as single family dwellings or room additions) will be treated as deposit-based in lieu of fixed fee. no comparison $14 ea. additional window no comparison no comparison - based on valuation PC 75% of permit fee no comparison - based on valuation no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Deck 2 story < 100 sqft.: $538 $ 478 $ 319 $ 194 no comparison - based on valuation no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 7 of 13Page 242 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 21 Patio cover - 1st 1,000 sq ft (standard and pre- engineered)each [1]423$ 340$ 22 Patio cover- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]213$ 212$ 23 Patio enclosure First 500 sq ft each [1]605$ 613$ 24 Patio enclosure- each additional 500 sq ft each 289$ 288$ 25 Patio enclosure- pre-engineered- first 500 sq ft each [1]503$ 501$ 26 Patio enclosure - pre-engineered- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]289$ 288$ 27 Defensible Space Review hourly NEW 152$ 28 Septic pre-inspection hourly 213$ 152$ 29 Relocate building each 1,139$ 1,144$ 30 Retaining wall- 1st 100 linear ft each [1]406$ 491$ first 25 l.f.: $120 $ 530 31 Retaining wall- each additional 50 linear ft each [1]76$ 76$ $ 29 $ 120 32 Retaining wall over 6' high each [1]529$ 537$ no comparison 33 Barn/storage shed up to 500 sq ft each [1]788$ 643$ 34 Barn/storage shed each additional 500 sq ft each [1]289$ 228$ 35 Bathroom Remodel each [1]289$ 455$ $ 129 Res: $459 Comm: $670 36 Interior remodel (residential) first 500 sq ft each [1]523$ 796$ 37 Interior remodel (residential) - each additional 500 sq ft each [1]366$ 364$ 38 Light Standards - first 5 each [1]727$ 734$ 39 Light Standards - each additional each [1]54$ 53$ 40 Mobile home- Not in MH Park each 1,142$ 1,177$ 41 Temporary Building/Trailer each 727$ 734$ 42 Demising wall 1-100 linear feet- commercial each [1]834$ 840$ 43 Demising wall each additional 100 linear ft. each [1]183$ 182$ 44 Partition wall 1-50 linear feet- commercial each [1]499$ 507$ 45 Partition wall each additional 50 linear feet each [1]183$ 182$ 46 Signs- Blade, channel letter, directional (structural) each [1]396$ 303$ $ 59 47 Signs- Monument Signs (structural and electrical) each [1]578$ 455$ $ 91 48 Signs - Wall signs- (structural and electrical) each [1]472$ 379$ $ 59 no comparison Res first 500 sq.f.t.: $182 501-1,500 sqft. : $198 Patio Permit Lattice Alum/Wood< 100 sqft: $361 each Lattice Alum/Wood>100 sqft: $459 each Solid Alum/wood< 100 sqft.: $538 Solid Alum/wood> 100 sqft.: Standard: $338 Footing only: $156 First 500 s.q.f.t.: $120 501-1,500 sqft.: $151 1,500+sq.ft. : $182 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 2'-4' High: $451 4'-6' High: $525 6' high+: $915 no comparison no comparison over 120 sqft.: $437 no comparison no comparison Res Kitchen Remodel: $538 Comm Kitchen Remodel: $1,014 no comparison no comparison - based on valuation no comparison - based on valuation no comparison - based on valuation no comparison $ 473 NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 8 of 13Page 243 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 49 Skylights / Smoke Hatches 1 - 10 each [1]580$ 583$ 50 Pre fab spa/hot tub each 458$ 598$ 51 Stairs- each flight / story each [1]499$ 507$ 52 Storage racks and catwalks- 1st 500 sq ft each [1]731$ 728$ 53 Storage racks and catwalks- 501 sq ft-250,000 sq ft each [1]1,462$ 1,214$ 54 Storage racks and catwalks- over 251,000 sq ft each [1]2,195$ 1,881$ 55 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 0-500sq ft each [1]986$ 992$ 56 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 501-5000 sq ft each [1]1,315$ 1,320$ 57 Mezzanines and Equipment Platforms - 5001 + sq ft each [1]1,615$ 1,608$ 58 Vinyl lined or fiberglass swimming pool- Residential each [1]777$ 598$ 59 Gunite swimming pool/spa - residential each [1]1,068$ 712$ $ 213 Pool Conventional: $736 Spa Conventional: $454 Non-Conventional: $610 Portable spa: $385 60 Commercial swimming pool each [1]1,626$ 1,174$ no comparison no comparison no comparison 61 Utility Release (Utility Connection) Processing Fee each 160$ 152$ Inspection (First Meter)each 160$ 152$ Inspection - ea. additional meter per meter 160$ 152$ 62 Tile Lift and Re-lay- first 3500 sq ft each 527$ 370$ 63 Tile Lift and Re-lay- Each additional 3500 sq ft each 219$ 303$ 64 Residential Composition Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each [1]301$ 309$ 65 Residential Composition Roof - ea. additional 1,000 sq ft each 152$ 152$ 66 Re-roofing - first 50,000 commercial each 423$ 431$ $ 365 67 Re-roofing - each additional 50,000 commercial each 237$ 159$ $ 427 68 Residential Tile Roof up to 2,000 sq ft each 376$ 417$ 69 Residential Tile Roof - each additional 1,000 sq ft each 225$ 228$ 70 Roof framing (replacement) - 1st 1,000 sq ft residential each [1]375$ 394$ $ 243 71 Roof framing (replacement) each additional 500 sq ft each [1]372$ 400$ no comparison 72 Roof coating- Commercial each 605$ 613$ 73 Roof coating- Residential each 316$ 324$ 74 Roof Repair up to 400 sq ft each NEW 152$ 75 Room addition- up to 500 sq ft each [1]1,047$ 1,053$ 76 Room addition- each additional 500 sq ft each [1]499$ 507$ no comparison Re-roof Hot - No Tear off <500 sqft.: $309; >1,000 sqft.: $459; >5,000 sqft.: $604 Hot - Tear off <500 sqft.: $426; >1,000 sqft.: $600; >5,000 sqft.: $670 Wood shakes No Structural Changes in sqft. Residential: $291 Comm up to 5k : $385 Comm 5k-10k: $458 Comm 10k+: $624 W/Structural changes in sqft. Residential: $458 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Under 12ft high up to 30k sqft.: $213 Under 12ft high 30k+sq.ft.: $228 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison - based on valuation no comparison - based on valuation no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison - based on valuation NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 9 of 13Page 244 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 77 Spray booth first 500 sq ft each [1]1,291$ 1,296$ 78 Spray booth -each additional 500 sq ft each [1]518$ 516$ 79 Sauna- pre-fabricated each 404$ 409$ 80 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer first 500 sq ft each 406$ 491$ 81 Siding , stucco, brick or stone veneer each additional 500 sq ft each 289$ 288$ 82 Solar/photovoltaic up to 15 Kw - Residential each [1]115$ 173$ Building permit & PC: $134 Electrical permit & PC: $134 $ 520 83 Solar/photovoltaic- ea. Kw over 15 Kw - Residential per kW [1]17$ 12$ $ 15 84 Solar/photovoltaic - 0-250 kw Commercial each [1]580$ 1,144$ $ 879 85 Solar/photovoltaic - ea. Kw over 250 Kw - Commercial per kW [1]6$ 5$ $ 7 86 Solar power storage system Commercial each [1]1,185$ 1,189$ 87 EV Charger each 152$ 303$ 88 Swimming Pool remodel each 517$ 455$ 89 Swimming Pool replaster each 402$ 334$ 90 Trash Enclosure up to 100 linear ft each 403$ 455$ first 500 sqft.: $151 501+ sqft.: $166 91 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO)each 152$ 152$ 92 Insulation / drywall- first 500 sq ft each 406$ 303$ 93 Insulation / drywall- each additional 500 sq ft each 174$ 303$ 94 Percolation inspection (septic) each 213$ 212$ 95 ADA or Seismic review (hourly)hourly 213$ 152$ 96 Cabana - outdoor living area with walls each [1]729$ 1,129$ 97 Fuel dispensing system each 1,546$ 1,559$ 98 Above ground tanks each 1,546$ 1,559$ 99 Carport- 1st 500 sq ft each [1]523$ 871$ 100 Carport - each additional 500 sq ft each [1]290$ 364$ 101 Structural Calculation review (hourly) hourly 153$ 152$ no comparison 102 Re-inspection Fee (hourly) hourly 153$ 152$ $ 113 $ 59 $ 81 $ 80 103 Plan Check (hourly)hourly 153$ 152$ $ 113 $ 146 no comparison 104 Inspection (hourly) hourly 153$ 152$ $ 113 no comparison $ 191 SERVICES & ACTIVITIES 1 Plan Duplication Fee includes flash drive each 47$ 76$ $ 22 2 Change of Address City Review hourly 610$ 653$ Recording and Mapping hourly 443$ 653$ 3 Occupancy Inspection each 260$ 280$ 4 Sewer and Water each 412$ 410$ 5 Hourly Minimum includes processing hourly 427$ 152$ 6 Public Art - Structural Review hourly NEW 433$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison $ 182 no comparison $ 723 no comparison no comparison no comparison - based on valuation no comparison no comparison up to 20,000 sqft.: $365 20,000+: $427 no comparison no comparison - based on valuation no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 10 of 13Page 245 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING Mechanical 1 HVAC system- residential each 304$ 303$ 2 HVAC system- ea. additional system each 58$ 46$ 3 Exhaust hood, vent fan, ventilation system, Heating unit, compressor, or Evaporative cooler Residential /commercial each each 290$ 379$ $ 345 Vent system: $13, Evaporation cooler: $45, Compressor:$45-$106, vent: $13, Furnace:$29-$45 Forced air, furnace, heaters, vents: $139 Boiler or compressor: $91- $208 depending on HP Air handling units: $91 Evaporative Cooler: $46 $ 156 Vents: $6.50 Boilers, Compressors and Absorption systems: $13- 82.75 ea. depending on HP Air handlers: $9.50-16.95 Evaporative coolers: $9.50 4 Package unit or split system- residential each 230$ 228$ 5 Package unit or split system- ea. additional system each 58$ 152$ 6 Ductwork only each 153$ 152$ $ 91 $ 276 7 Freezer/cooler- 1st 500 sq ft commercial each 484$ 491$ 8 Freezer/cooler- 501-50,000 sq ft commercial each 941$ 947$ 9 Freezer/cooler- 51,000 + sq ft commercial each 1,169$ 1,174$ 10 Type II hoods or other ventilation system - commercial each 635$ 643$ $ 91 $ 312 11 Exhaust Hood- Type I -commercial each 865$ 1,098$ $ 13 $ 277 $ 312 12 Dust Collection System- commercial each 1,576$ 1,590$ $ 312 13 Cooling tower or heat exchange- commercial each 1,020$ 1,055$ no comparison Plumbing 1 Sewer /water service connection- residential each 191$ 190$ first 15: $172.50 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 2 Plumbing or gas fixtures -first 5 fixtures residential each 230$ 228$ $ 11 $ 29 $33 each $120 each fixture $8.75 each 3 Plumbing or gas fixtures -each additional residential each 39$ 38$ no comparison $ 29 $33 each $120 each fixture $8.75 each 4 Private sewage disposal system (new/altered- each residential)each 457$ 455$ $ 432 $ 91 $ 277 $120 each building sewer $66.50 each 5 Re-piping up to 20 fixtures - residential each 304$ 303$ $ 129 $ 120 $33 each fixture $120 each fixture $8.75 each 6 Water service line- residential each 191$ 190$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 7 Backflow preventer- first 5 residential each 230$ 228$ no comparison $ 45 $33 each $ 109 $8.75 each 8 Backflow preventer- each additional each 15$ 15$ no comparison $ 9 $33 each $ 109 $8.75 each 9 Water heater - each residential each 153$ 91$ $ 13 $ 29 $ 91 $ 120 $11 each 10 Tankless water heater- residential each 230$ 167$ no comparison no comparison no comparison 11 Graywater system - residential each 153$ 152$ $ 277 no comparison $8.75 each 12 Solar water system - residential each 380$ 379$ no comparison no comparison no comparison 13 Repair- Drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- Residential each 153$ 152$ $29 each fixture $ 139 $ 156 $4.25 each 14 Sewer connection - commercial each 304$ 303$ no comparison $ 115 no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Ventilation and Exhaust: Fans: $6.50 not part of heating or air no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 11 of 13Page 246 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] 15 Plumbing or gas fixtures- first 5 commercial each 458$ 455$ $ 432 $ 145 $33 each $120 each fixture $8.75 each 16 Plumbing or gas fixtures- each additional commercial each 191$ 190$ $ 129 $ 29 $33 each $120 each fixture $8.75 each 17 Private sewage disposal system- commercial each 458$ 455$ no comparison $ 91 $ 277 $120 each building sewer $66.50 each 18 Grease interceptor- commercial each 380$ 379$ $ 173 $ 91 $ 277 $ 239 $17.75 each 19 Backflow preventer- commercial each 304$ 303$ $ 173 $ 9 $33 each $ 109 $8.75 each 20 Solar water system - commercial each 914$ 910$ no comparison no comparison no comparison 21 Graywater system - commercial each 230$ 228$ $ 277 no comparison $8.75 each 22 Medical Gas system each 1,105$ 1,100$ gas piping system 1-4 outlets: $91 ea. addl: $46 gas piping system up to 4 outlets: $203 ea. addl: $83 1-5 outlets: $5.50 ea. additional: $1.00 23 Repair drain line, sewer line, water service or gas line- commercial each 304$ 303$ $29 each fixture $ 139 $ 156 $4.25 each 24 Water heater- commercial each 304$ 303$ $ 29 $ 91 $ 120 $11 each 25 Tankless water heater - commercial each 380$ 379$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison Electrical 1 Outdoor events- carnival rides, electric generators each 380$ 379$ no comparison 3 hours: $182 Electrical generators & elec. Driven rides: $172 each Mechanically driven: $225 each no comparison Electrical generators & elec. Driven rides: $22 each Mechanically driven: $6.50 each 2 Meter pedestal each 191$ 190$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 3 Electrical for alumawood patio cover/ enclosure - 1- 10 lights, outlets, switches each 75$ 76$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 4 Temporary power pole meter panel (each) each 230$ 167$ $ 86 $ 45 $ 172 $ 166 $ 22 5 Temporary power pole- distribution panel (each) each 77$ 76$ $ 43 $ 29 $ 172 $ 83 $ 11 6 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures - first 10 each 230$ 167$ $ 129 Receptacle: $29 / Fixtures first 20: $75 first 20: $41 $ 239 first 20: $1.00 ea. 7 Receptacle, switch, lighting fixtures -each additional fixture each 16$ 38$ $ 3 $ 4 $ 22 ea. addl 10: $120 ea. addtl: $0.65 8 Appliances, apparatus- residential each 230$ 228$ $ 13 $ 120 9 Appliances, apparatus- Commercial each 230$ 228$ $ 29 Rating in horsepower up to/incl 1: $203 1-10: $239 10-50: $322 50-100: $442 over 100: $608 10 Motors, generators- residential each 230$ 228$ no comparison $ 29 no comparison $ 22 11 Motors, generators, transformer- commercial each 380$ 379$ no comparison $ 29 no comparison $ 22 12 Electrical service less than 400 amp - commercial each 152$ 303$ less than 200 amps: $172 less than 200 amps: $59 less than 200 amps: $139 less than 200 amps: $27.25 13 Electrical service panel 401 amp - 1200 amp- commercial each 533$ 531$ 200-1000 amps: $258 200-1000 amps: $91 200-1000 amps: $277 200-1000 amps: $55.50 14 Electrical service panel over 1200 amp- commercial each 762$ 759$ over 1000 amps: $431 over 1000 amps: $120 over 1000 amps: $417 over 1000 amps: $111 15 Conduits for future use up to 500'each 191$ 190$ $ 143 no comparison $ 139 no comparison $ 16 16 Conduits for future use each add 'l 500'each 75$ 76$ $ 143 no comparison $ 139 no comparison $ 16 Appliances: $4.25 Apparatuses: 1 - $4.25 2-10 : $11 11-50: $22 51-100: $44.25 101+: $66.50 up to 800 amps: $239 over 800 amps: $406 no comparison no comparison up to 1: $143 1-10: $158 10-50: $172 50-100: $258 over 100: $345 Res Appliances: $22 Non Res: $139 Apparatuses: 1 - $46 2-10 : $139 11-50: $208 51-100: $277 101+: $417 NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Building COMP, Page 12 of 13Page 247 City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department - User Fee Study Fiscal Year 23-24 Cost of Service Estimate for Fee Related Services and Activities APPENDIX B.2 Fee No.Fee Name Fee Unit / Type Notes Current Fee / Deposit Cost of Service Per Activity Ontario [1]Fontana [2]Upland [3]Eastvale [4]Chino [5] MEP MISCELLANEOUS 1 MEP fee (hourly) includes re-inspection fee hourly 153$ 152$ $ 113 $ 59 no comparison $ 81 no comparison 2 MEP Plan check (hourly) hourly 153$ 152$ $ 113 no comparison $ 183 $ 146 no comparison 3 MEP Plan check by engineer hourly 153$ 152$ no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison no comparison 4 General Plan Maintenance Fee surcharge 10% on top of selected planning applications and building permits Advanced Long Range Planning Fee: 5% of all building permits and Planning applications no comparison General plan update fee: 7% no comparison General Plan Update fee .05% of the job valuation 5 Technology Fee surcharge 7% TOTAL [Notes] [1]Source data from: "Ontario_FY 2022-23 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule_0.pdf" [2]Source data from: "Fontana_FY23-24 User Fee Report.pdf" [3]Source data from: "City of Upland Master Fee Schedule-Effective 08.01.22.pdf" [4]Source data from: "Eastvale FY21-22_User Fee Schedule.pdf" [5]Source data from: "Chino_Building Fee Schedule 2022_202202011813236493.pdf" [6]Type (1 & 2 F.R.) (3-1HR) (or A/B), Type (3-N) & (4) (or A/B) [7]Type (2-1HR) (2-N) (or A/B), Type (5-1HR) & (5-N) (or A/B) NBS - Local Government Solutions Web: www.nbsgov.com Toll-Free:800.676.7516 11/27/2023 Page 247B Building COMP, Page 13 of 13 Page 1 of 1 REVISION: As part of the City’s outreach on this item, the staff met with representatives of the Building Industry of America (BIA). BIA representatives have asked for clarifying information related to the proposed adjustments to the Transportation Development Impact Fee (DIF) schedule. In order to fully address these questions, staff is recommending that the public hearing for the Transportation DIF be continued to January 17, 2023. BIA representatives have committed to providing a comprehensive list of questions on this item to staff no later than January 2, 2023. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: 1. Conduct a public hearing on the proposed new and amended Citywide service and user fees; 2. Continue the public hearing on the Transportation Development Impact Fees to January 17, 2023 at 7:00 p.m.; and 3. Adopt a resolution to establish new fees, repeal outdated fees, and amend certain existing fees for Citywide service and user fees. ATTACHMENTS: None. DATE: December 6, 2023 TO: John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager Zack Neighbors, Director of Building and Safety Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Chandra Thomas, Management Analyst III Jason Shields, Management Analyst II Aracely Estrada, Management Analyst I BY: Jason Welday, City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Establishing, Repealing, and Amending Certain Service and User Fee Adjustments for Various Departments (Building and Safety Services, Planning and Economic Development, and Community Services), Consider Amending the Transportation Development Impact Fees for Engineering Services, and Consider Two Resolutions Approving Such New Service and User Fees. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-121) and (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-122) (CITY) MEMORANDUM Engineering Department Corrected Staff Report Memo: 12/6/2023 Item G2 Advertised Public Hearing CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEE ADJUSTMENTS FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS Public Hearing December 6, 2023 BACKGROUND •The City offers many services. Fees are charged to recover costs associated with services provided. •Fees are reviewed and updated each year. •The following departments participated in fee adjustments: Building & Safety Planning & Economic Development Engineering Community Services 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building & Safety and Planning & Economic Development Departments: •Conducted a comprehensive fee analysis/study. •Last fee analysis was completed in 2018. •Contracted with NBS. 3 BUILDING & SAFETY •All Building & Safety Fees were analyzed. •Current cost recovery: 93% •Adjustments include (but are not limited to): Separating submission types by residential routed, non- routed, and no plan check. Some fees were collapsed, combined, or eliminated. Fee reductions were recommended for some common permit types used by local businesses and homeowners. 4 BUILDING & SAFETY CONTINUED New cost recovery: 99% 184 86 21 20 0 50 100 150 200 Number of Fees Adjustments made to Building & Safety Fees Increased Decreased New Subsidized 5 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT •Most Planning fees were analyzed. •Current cost recovery: 69.8% •Adjustments include (but are not limited to): Recategorized several fee types from Deposit-based to Flat (fixed). Several fees were removed due to no longer being needed. New fees to recover costs from unfunded state mandates. 6 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED New cost recovery: 88% 85 6 4 22 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Number of Fees Adjustments made to Planning Fees Increased Decreased New Subsidized 7 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE •All cities and counties must have a General Plan. •As this is an unfunded mandate, fees are collected to offset the cost of updating and implementing it. •Current fee: 10% •Analysis findings: 15.9% •Recommended: 10% 8 Recommend maintaining current fee COMMUNITY SERVICES •Update to ActiveNet Transaction Fee Increase the fee from 4% of transaction amount to 5% of transaction amount. •Updates to court and field rentals Removed block times Added hourly option Added half court rental options •Updates to language changes and removal of fees no longer applicable. 10 EFFECTIVE DATES OF FEES Proposed fees will become effective on the following dates: •Building & Safety/Planning and Economic Development 60 days from adoption of the resolution February 5, 2024 •Community Services January 2, 2024 11 PUBLIC OUTREACH Outreach efforts of the proposed fee changes include: 1)Building and Safety fee updates were provided to the Building Industry Association and the Desert Valley Builders Association. 2)Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the newspaper twice. 3)Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to interested parties by the City Clerk’s Office. 4)Fee Cost Analysis were made available for viewing in the City Clerk’s Office on November 22nd2023. 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: •Open the public hearing on the proposed new and amended service and user fees; •Adopt a Resolution to establish new fees, repeal outdated fees, and amend certain existing fees for Building & Safety, Planning, and Community Services. •Continue the public hearing on the Transportation Development Impact Fees to January 17, 2024. 13 THANK YOU 13 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Adopting and Approving the Issuance of Bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority in the Amount not to Exceed $12 Million to Improve and Rehab the Physical Condition of Pepperwood Apartments Located at 9055 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2023-117) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council (1) conduct a TEFRA public hearing under the requirements of Section 147 (f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and (2) by resolution approve the issuance of bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority in the amount not to exceed $12 million to improve and rehab the physical condition of Pepperwood Apartments located at 9055 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga BACKGROUND: Pepperwood Apartments is a 230-unit multifamily property in Rancho Cucamonga that offers housing units to households earning 35%, 45% and 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Originally constructed in 1971, LINC-Pepperwood Housing Investors LP acquired and rehabilitated the property in 2006. In 2022, LINC purchased the Enterprise Neighborhood Partners Fund's interest in the property and now wholly own the site. The current physical condition of Pepperwood is stable; however, the 230-unit property requires some rehab since it was last improved 17-years ago. The issuance of bonds will allow for the necessary improvements and rehabilitation of the site to occur. ANALYSIS: The issuance of tax exempt, private activity bonds must be approved by the jurisdiction in which the project is located following a public hearing in accordance with Internal Revenue Code requirements. A TEFRA public hearing provides a reasonable opportunity for interested individuals to express their views, orally or in writing, on the proposed issuance of bonds and the location and nature of the proposed project to be financed. Without the approval or the TEFRA public hearing, the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee will not allocate tax exempt bonds to the Project which are an essential component of the Project financing. The new tax-exempt bond will be in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000, with an anticipated interest rate of 4.66%. The new bond will have a 10-Year term, 35-Year amortization, and a Yield Maintenance Period of 9.5 years. Page 248 of 273 Page 2 2 1 5 8 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action does not have a fiscal impact on the General Fund. The bonds and the obligation to pay principal and interest and any redemption premium will not constitute indebtedness or an obligation of the City. The City will not have any obligation to repay the bonds or to acquire, construct, improve, equip or operate the Project. Financing documents with respect to the issuance of the bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the bonds are not obligations of the City but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower. All financial obligations for the bonds and all fees and costs associated with the bonds will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: While this action may not address a specific City Council goal, this action is consistent with the City’s Core Values. The City is guided through a number of core values and this action will help provide a high quality of life and enhance a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution 2023-117 Attachment 2 – Subordination Agreement Page 249 of 273 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF QUALIFIED 501(C)(3) BONDS FOR A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT FOR PEPPERWOOD APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) is authorized pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. and the terms of an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1988 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies throughout the State of California, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), to issue revenue bonds in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of financing multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, LINC-Pepperwood Housing Investors LP (the “Borrower”) which is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) has requested that the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as defined in Section 145 of the Code in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such qualified 501(c)(3) bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $12,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount (the “Bonds”). A portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used by the Borrower to finance or refinance the acquisition and rehabilitation of a multifamily rental housing project located at 9055 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California (the “Rancho Cucamonga Site”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to their issuance, the Bonds are required to be approved by the “applicable elected representative” of the governmental units on whose behalf such bonds are expected to be issued and by a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the entire area in which any facility financed by such bonds is to be located, after a public hearing held following reasonable public notice; and WHEREAS, the members of this City Council (this “City Council”) are the applicable elected representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 7 days prior to the date hereof, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on a date specified in such notice; and WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on such date, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority is also requesting that the City Council approve the issuance of any refunding bonds hereafter issued by the Authority for the purpose of refinancing the Attachment 1Page 250 of 273 2 Bonds which financed the Rancho Cucamonga Site (the “Refunding Bonds”), but only in such cases where federal tax laws would not require additional consideration or approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Bonds required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 9 of the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds and the Refunding Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the Bonds for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code and (b) Section 9 of the Agreement. Section 3. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 6th day of December, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Page 251 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 1 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc. (Lender) c/o CBRE Loan Services, Inc. 929 Gessner Road, Suite 1700 Houston, Texas 77024 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Nicholas Pirulli, Esq. Kearbey Pirulli & Evatt LLC 7910 Woodmont Avenue Suite 750 Bethesda, MD 20814 ---------------------------- [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] ---------------------------- SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (Affordable) This SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) dated as of __________ ____, 2023, is executed by and among (i) CBRE MULTIFAMILY CAPITAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Senior Lender”), (ii) HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate and politic (“Subordinate Lender”), and (iii) LINC-PEPPERWOOD HOUSING INVESTORS, LP, a California limited partnership (“Borrower”). RECITALS: A.Pursuant to that certain Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement dated as of the date hereof, executed by and between Borrower and Senior Lender (as amended, restated, replaced, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Senior Loan Agreement”), Senior Lender has agreed to make a loan to Borrower in the original principal amount of $_________ (the “Senior Loan”), as evidenced by that certain Multifamily Note dated as of the date hereof, executed by Borrower and made payable to the order of Senior Lender in the amount of the Senior Loan (as amended, restated, replaced, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Senior Note”). B.In addition to the Senior Loan Agreement, the Senior Loan and the Senior Note are also secured by a certain Multifamily Mortgage, Deed of Trust or Deed to Secure Debt dated as of the date hereof (as amended, restated, replaced, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Senior Security Instrument”), encumbering the property described in the Senior Security Instrument as the “Mortgaged Property”, as further described in Exhibit A attached hereto. Attachment 2Page 252 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 2 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae C. Borrower has requested Senior Lender to permit that certain subordinate loan in the amount of $20,350,000 (the “Subordinate Loan”) from Subordinate Lender to Borrower and to allow the Subordinate Loan to be secured by a mortgage lien against the Mortgaged Property. D. Senior Lender has agreed to permit the continued existence of the Subordinate Loan and to allow the subordinate mortgage lien to continue against the Mortgaged Property subject to all of the conditions contained in this Agreement. AGREEMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, in order to induce Senior Lender to permit the continued existence Subordinate Loan to Borrower and to allow the subordinate mortgage lien to continue against the Mortgaged Property, and in consideration thereof, Senior Lender, Subordinate Lender and Borrower agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Definitions. In addition to the terms defined in the Recitals to this Agreement, for purposes of this Agreement the following terms have the respective meanings set forth below: “Affiliate” means, when used with respect to a Person, any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, trust or individual Controlled by, under common Control with, or which Controls such Person, and in all cases any other Person that holds fifty percent (50%) or more of the ownership interests in such Person. “Borrower” means the Person named as such in the first paragraph on page 1 of this Agreement, any successor or assign of Borrower, including without limitation, a receiver, trustee or debtor-in- possession and any other Person (other than Senior Lender) who acquires title to the Mortgaged Property after the date of this Agreement. “Business Day” means any day other than (a) a Saturday, (b) a Sunday, (c) a day on which Senior Lender is not open for business, or (d) a day on which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is not open for business. “Condemnation Action” means any action or proceeding, however characterized or named, relating to any condemnation or other taking, or conveyance in lieu thereof, of all or any part of the Mortgaged Property, whether direct or indirect. “Control” (including with correlative meanings, the terms “Controlling,” “Controlled by” and “under common Control with”), as applied to any entity, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or operations of such entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, ownership interests or by contract or otherwise. Page 253 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 3 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae “Default Notice” means: (a) a copy of any written notice from Senior Lender to Borrower and Subordinate Lender stating that a Senior Loan Default has occurred under the Senior Loan Documents; or (b) a copy of the written notice from Subordinate Lender to Borrower and Senior Lender stating that a Subordinate Loan Default has occurred under the Subordinate Loan Documents. Each Default Notice shall specify the default upon which such Default Notice is based. “Person” means an individual, an estate, a trust, a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company or any other organization or entity (whether governmental or private). “Regulatory Agreement” means, individually and collectively, the (i) Amended and Restated Regulatory Agreement dated as of August 29, 2006 by Borrower and Subordinate Lender, and recorded in the Official Records on September 1, 2006 as Document # 2006-0604147 and (ii) Amended and Restated Operation and Maintenance Agreement dated as of August 29, 2006 by Borrower and Subordinate Lender, and recorded in the Official Records on September 1, 2006 as Document # 2006-0604148. “Senior Lender” means the Person named as such in the first paragraph on Page 1 of this Agreement, its successors and assigns and any other Person who becomes the legal holder of the Senior Loan after the date of this Agreement. “Senior Loan Default” means the occurrence of an “Event of Default” as that term is defined in the Senior Loan Documents. “Senior Loan Documents” means the Senior Security Instrument, the Senior Note, the Senior Loan Agreement, and all other “Loan Documents” as that term is defined in the Senior Loan Agreement. “Subordinate Lender” means the Person named as such in the first paragraph on page 1 of this Agreement, any successor or assign of Subordinate Lender, including without limitation, a receiver, trustee or debtor-in-possession and any other Person who becomes the legal holder of the Subordinate Note after the date of this Agreement. “Subordinate Loan Agreement” means the Loan Agreement dated as of April 26, 2006 by and between Borrower and Subordinate Lender, as amended by that Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement by and between Borrower and Subordinate Lender made and entered into as of May 16, 2007. “Subordinate Loan Default” means a default by Borrower in performing or observing any of the terms, covenants or conditions in the Subordinate Loan Documents to be performed or observed by it, which continues beyond any applicable period provided in the Subordinate Loan Documents for curing the default. “Subordinate Loan Documents” means the Subordinate Note, the Subordinate Mortgage, the Subordinate Loan Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement and all other documents evidencing, securing or otherwise executed and delivered in connection with the Subordinate Loan. Page 254 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 4 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae “Subordinate Mortgage” means, collectively, the Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (With Assignment of Rents) dated as of April 26, 2006 by Borrower for the benefit of Subordinate Lender, recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernadino (“Official Records”) on May 1, 2006 as Document # 2006-0297267, as modified by that Amendment to Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing With Assignment of Rents dated June 4, 2007, and recorded in the Official records on June 8, 2007 as Document # 2007-0346256, as security for the Subordinate Loan. “Subordinate Note” means the Residual Receipts Promissory Note dated April 19, 2006 issued by Borrower to Subordinate Lender, or order, to evidence the Subordinate Loan, and as amended by that Amendment to Residual Receipts Promissory Note dated June 4, 2007. “Surplus Cash” means, with respect to any period, any revenues of the Borrower remaining after paying, or setting aside funds for paying, all of the following: (i) All sums due or currently required to be paid under the Senior Loan. (ii) All sums due or currently required to be paid under the Senior Loan Documents, including but not limited to any Imposition Deposits. (iii) All deposits to any replacement reserve, repair reserve or other reserve or escrow required by the Senior Loan Documents that are due or currently payable. (iv) All reasonable operating expenses of the Mortgaged Property, including but not limited to real estate taxes, insurance premiums, utilities, building maintenance, painting and repairs, management fees, payroll, administrative expenses, legal expenses and audit expenses (excluding any developer fees payable with respect to the Mortgaged Property). 3. Permission to Place Mortgage Lien Against Mortgaged Property. Senior Lender agrees, notwithstanding the prohibition against inferior liens on the Mortgaged Property contained in the Senior Loan Documents and subject to the provisions of this Agreement, to permit Subordinate Lender to retain the lien of the Subordinate Mortgage and other recorded Subordinate Loan Documents against the Mortgaged Property to secure Borrower’s obligation to repay the Subordinate Note and all other obligations, indebtedness and liabilities of Borrower to Subordinate Lender under and in connection with the Subordinate Loan. 4. Borrower’s and Subordinate Lender’s Representations and Warranties. Borrower and Subordinate Lender each makes the following representations and warranties to Senior Lender: (a) Subordinate Loan Documents. The Subordinate Loan is evidenced by the Subordinate Note and is secured by the Subordinate Mortgage, the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the Subordinate Loan Documents. Page 255 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 5 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae (b) Subordinate Note. The Subordinate Note shall be deemed to contain the following provision: The indebtedness evidenced by this Note is and shall be subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of the indebtedness evidenced by a Multifamily Note (and any schedules) dated as of even date herewith in the original principal amount of $____________, executed by LINC-PEPPERWOOD HOUSING INVESTORS, LP, a California limited partnership and payable to the order of CBRE MULTIFAMILY CAPITAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Senior Lender”), to the extent and in the manner provided in that certain Subordination Agreement dated as of even date herewith between the payee of this Note, and Senior Lender and LINC-PEPPERWOOD HOUSING INVESTORS, LP, a California limited partnership (the “Subordination Agreement”). The Mortgage, Deed of Trust or Deed to Secure Debt (and any exhibits) securing this Note is and shall be subject and subordinate in all respects to the liens, terms, covenants and conditions of the Multifamily Mortgage, Deed of Trust or Deed to Secure Debt (and any exhibits) securing the Multifamily Note and the terms, covenants and conditions of the Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement evidencing the terms of the Multifamily Note, as more fully set forth in the Subordination Agreement. The rights and remedies of the payee and each subsequent holder of this Note under the Mortgage, Deed of Trust or Deed to Secure Debt (and any exhibits) securing this Note are subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth in the Subordination Agreement. Each subsequent holder of this Note shall be deemed, by virtue of such holder’s acquisition of the Note, to have agreed to perform and observe all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be performed or observed by Subordinate Lender under the Subordination Agreement. (c) Relationship of Borrower to Subordinate Lender and Senior Lender. Subordinate Lender is not an Affiliate of Borrower and is not in possession of any facts which would lead it to believe that Senior Lender is an Affiliate of Borrower. (d) Term. The term of the Subordinate Note does not end before the stated term of the Senior Note. (e) Subordinate Loan Documents. The executed Subordinate Loan Documents are substantially in the same forms as those submitted to, and approved by, Senior Lender prior to the date of this Agreement. (f) Interpretation of Defined Terms in the Subordinate Loan Documents. Page 256 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 6 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae For purposes of this Agreement, Subordinate Lender acknowledges that the term Senior Loan as defined herein, shall mean, and shall qualify as a “Senior Loan” as such term is used in the Subordinate Loan Documents. 5. Deliveries. Subordinate Lender shall submit the following items to Senior Lender the later of (a) ten (10) Business Days after the effective date of the Senior Loan Documents: (1) Intentionally Omitted. (2) Certification. A certification from Borrower and Subordinate Lender to Senior Lender that the Subordinate Loan Documents do not contain any changes from the Subordinate Loan Documents submitted to, and approved by, Senior Lender prior to the date of this Agreement. (3) Subordinate Loan Documents. A complete set of the fully executed Subordinate Loan Documents, certified by Borrower to be true, correct and complete. Borrower shall submit to Subordinate Lender, an executed copy of each of the Senior Loan Documents, certified by Borrower to be true, correct and complete. 6. Terms of Subordination. (a) Agreement to Subordinate. Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender agree that (1) the indebtedness evidenced by the Subordinate Loan Documents is and shall be subordinated in right of payment, to the extent and in the manner provided in this Agreement, to the prior payment in full of the Indebtedness evidenced by the Senior Loan Documents, and (2) the liens, terms, covenants and conditions of the Subordinate Mortgage and the other Subordinate Loan Documents are and shall be subject and subordinate in all respects to the liens, terms, covenants and conditions of the Senior Security Instrument and the other Senior Loan Documents and to all advances heretofore made or which may hereafter be made pursuant to the Senior Security Instrument and the other Senior Loan Documents (including but not limited to, all sums advanced for the purposes of (A) protecting or further securing the lien of the Senior Security Instrument, curing defaults by Borrower under the Senior Loan Documents or for any other purpose expressly permitted by the Senior Loan Documents, or (B) constructing, renovating, repairing, furnishing, fixturing or equipping the Mortgaged Property). In addition to the limitations set forth above, the Subordinate Lender hereby agrees that the Subordinate Loan will be payable solely from 75% of Surplus Cash while the Senior Loan remains outstanding. Page 257 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 7 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae (b) Subordination of Subrogation Rights. Subordinate Lender agrees that if, by reason of its payment of real estate taxes or other monetary obligations of Borrower, or by reason of its exercise of any other right or remedy under the Subordinate Loan Documents, it acquires by right of subrogation or otherwise a lien on the Mortgaged Property which (but for this subsection) would be senior to the lien of the Senior Security Instrument, then, in that event, such lien shall be subject and subordinate to the lien of the Senior Security Instrument. (c) Payments Before Senior Loan Default. Until Subordinate Lender receives a Default Notice (or otherwise acquires actual knowledge) of a Senior Loan Default, Subordinate Lender shall be entitled to retain for its own account all payments made under or pursuant to the Subordinate Loan Documents, provided that no such payment exceeds 75% of then available Surplus Cash. (d) Payments After Senior Loan Default. Borrower agrees that, after it receives a Default Notice (or otherwise acquires knowledge) of a Senior Loan Default, it will not make any payments under or pursuant to the Subordinate Loan Documents (including but not limited to principal, interest, additional interest, late payment charges, default interest, attorneys’ fees, or any other sums secured by the Subordinate Loan Documents) without Senior Lender’s prior written consent. Subordinate Lender agrees that, after it receives a Default Notice from Senior Lender with written instructions directing Subordinate Lender not to accept payments from Borrower on account of the Subordinate Loan, it will not accept any payments under or pursuant to the Subordinate Loan Documents (including but not limited to principal, interest, additional interest, late payment charges, default interest, attorneys’ fees, or any other sums secured by the Subordinate Loan Documents) without Senior Lender’s prior written consent. If Subordinate Lender receives written notice from Senior Lender that the Senior Loan Default which gave rise to Subordinate Lender’s obligation not to accept payments has been cured, waived, or otherwise suspended by Senior Lender, the restrictions on payment to Subordinate Lender in this Section 6 shall terminate, and Senior Lender shall have no right to any subsequent payments made to Subordinate Lender by Borrower prior to Subordinate Lender’s receipt of a new Default Notice from Senior Lender in accordance with the provisions of this Section 6(d). (e) Remitting Subordinate Loan Payments to Senior Lender. If, after Subordinate Lender receives a Default Notice from Senior Lender in accordance with Section 6(d), Subordinate Lender receives any payments under the Subordinate Loan Documents, Subordinate Lender agrees that such payment or other distribution will be received and held in trust for Senior Lender and unless Senior Lender otherwise notifies Subordinate Lender in writing, will be promptly remitted, in kind to Senior Lender, properly endorsed to Senior Lender, to be applied to the principal of, interest on and other amounts due under the Senior Loan Documents in accordance with the provisions of the Senior Loan Documents. By executing this Agreement, Borrower specifically authorizes Subordinate Lender to endorse and remit any such payments to Senior Lender, and specifically waives any and all rights to have such payments Page 258 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 8 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae returned to Borrower or credited against the Subordinate Loan. Borrower and Senior Lender acknowledge and agree that payments received by Subordinate Lender, and remitted to Senior Lender under this Section 6, shall not be applied or otherwise credited against the Subordinate Loan, nor shall the tender of such payment to Senior Lender waive any Subordinate Loan Default which may arise from the inability of Subordinate Lender to retain such payment or apply such payment to the Subordinate Loan. (f) Notice of Payment from Other Persons. Subordinate Lender agrees to notify (telephonically or via email, followed by written notice) Senior Lender of Subordinate Lender’s receipt from any Person other than Borrower of a payment with respect to Borrower’s obligations under the Subordinate Loan Documents, promptly after Subordinate Lender obtains knowledge of such payment. (g) Agreement Not to Commence Bankruptcy Proceeding. Subordinate Lender agrees that during the term of this Agreement it will not commence, or join with any other creditor in commencing any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, insolvency or liquidation proceedings against or with respect to Borrower, without Senior Lender’s prior written consent. 7. Default Under Subordinate Loan Documents. (a) Notice of Subordinate Loan Default and Cure Rights. Subordinate Lender shall deliver to Senior Lender a Default Notice within five (5) Business Days in each case where Subordinate Lender has given a Default Notice to Borrower. Failure of Subordinate Lender to send a Default Notice to Senior Lender shall not prevent the exercise of Subordinate Lender’s rights and remedies under the Subordinate Loan Documents, subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Senior Lender shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Subordinate Loan Default within sixty (60) days following the date of such notice; provided, however that Subordinate Lender shall be entitled, during such sixty (60) day period, to continue to pursue its rights and remedies under the Subordinate Loan Documents. All amounts paid by Senior Lender in accordance with the Senior Loan Documents to cure a Subordinate Loan Default shall be deemed to have been advanced by Senior Lender pursuant to, and shall be secured by, the Senior Loan Agreement and the Senior Security Instrument. (b) Subordinate Lender’s Exercise of Remedies After Notice to Senior Lender. If a Subordinate Loan Default occurs and is continuing, Subordinate Lender agrees that, without Senior Lender’s prior written consent, it will not commence foreclosure proceedings with respect to the Mortgaged Property under the Subordinate Loan Documents or exercise any other rights or remedies it may have under the Subordinate Loan Documents, including, but not limited to accelerating the Subordinate Loan (and enforcing any “due on sale” provision included in the Subordinate Loan Documents), collecting rents, appointing (or seeking the appointment of) a receiver or exercising any other rights or remedies thereunder unless and until it has given Senior Lender at least sixty (60) days prior written notice; during such sixty (60) day period, however, Page 259 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 9 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae Subordinate Lender shall be entitled to exercise and enforce all other rights and remedies available to Subordinate Lender under the Subordinate Loan Documents and/or under applicable laws, including without limitation, rights to enforce covenants and agreements of Borrower relating to income, rent, or affordability restrictions contained in any land use restriction agreement. (c) Cross Default. Borrower and Subordinate Lender agree that a Subordinate Loan Default shall constitute a Senior Loan Default under the Senior Loan Documents and Senior Lender shall have the right to exercise all rights or remedies under the Senior Loan Documents in the same manner as in the case of any other Senior Loan Default. If Subordinate Lender notifies Senior Lender in writing that any Subordinate Loan Default of which Senior Lender has received a Default Notice has been cured or waived, as determined by Subordinate Lender in its sole discretion, then provided that Senior Lender has not conducted a sale of the Mortgaged Property pursuant to its rights under the Senior Loan Documents, any Senior Loan Default under the Senior Loan Documents arising solely from such Subordinate Loan Default shall be deemed cured, and the Senior Loan shall be reinstated, provided, however, that Senior Lender shall not be required to return or otherwise credit for the benefit of Borrower any default rate interest or other default related charges or payments received by Senior Lender during such Senior Loan Default. 8. Default Under Senior Loan Documents. (a) Notice of Senior Loan Default and Cure Rights. Senior Lender shall deliver to Subordinate Lender a Default Notice within five (5) Business Days in each case where Senior Lender has given a Default Notice to Borrower. Failure of Senior Lender to send a Default Notice to Subordinate Lender shall not prevent the exercise of Senior Lender’s rights and remedies under the Senior Loan Documents, subject to the provisions of this Section 8(a), nor shall such failure constitute a default by Senior Lender under this Agreement. Subordinate Lender shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such Senior Loan Default within sixty (60) days following the date of such Default Notice or the date on which Subordinate Lender otherwise acquires actual knowledge of Senior Loan Default; provided, however, that Senior Lender shall be entitled during such sixty (60) day period to continue to pursue its remedies under the Senior Loan Documents. Subordinate Lender may have up to ninety (90) days from the date of the Default Notice to cure a non-monetary default if during such ninety (90) day period Subordinate Lender keeps current all payments required by the Senior Loan Documents. In the event that such a non-monetary default creates an unacceptable level of risk relative to the Mortgaged Property, or Senior Lender’s secured position relative to the Mortgaged Property, as determined by Senior Lender in its sole discretion, then Senior Lender may exercise during such ninety (90) day period all available rights and remedies to protect and preserve the Mortgaged Property and the rents, revenues and other proceeds from the Mortgaged Property. All amounts paid by Subordinate Lender to Senior Lender to cure a Senior Loan Default shall be deemed to have been advanced by Subordinate Lender pursuant to, and shall be secured by the Subordinate Loan Agreement and the Subordinate Mortgage. Page 260 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 10 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae (b) Cross Default. Subordinate Lender agrees that, notwithstanding any contrary provision contained in the Subordinate Loan Documents, a Senior Loan Default shall not constitute a default under the Subordinate Loan Documents (if no other default has occurred under the Subordinate Loan Documents) until either (1) Senior Lender has accelerated the maturity of the Senior Loan, or (2) Senior Lender has taken affirmative action to exercise its rights under the Senior Loan Documents to collect rent, to appoint (or seek the appointment of) a receiver or to foreclose on (or to exercise a power of sale contained in) the Senior Loan Documents. At any time after a Senior Loan Default is determined to constitute a default under the Subordinate Loan Documents, Subordinate Lender shall be permitted to pursue its remedies for default under the Subordinate Loan Documents, subject to the restrictions and limitations of this Agreement. If at any time Borrower cures any Senior Loan Default to the satisfaction of Senior Lender, as evidenced by written notice from Senior Lender to Subordinate Lender, any default under the Subordinate Loan Documents arising from such Senior Loan Default shall be deemed cured and the Subordinate Loan shall be retroactively reinstated as if such Senior Loan Default had never occurred. 9. Conflict. Borrower, Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender each agrees that, in the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of the Senior Loan Documents, the Subordinate Loan Documents and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and control solely as to the following: (a) the relative priority of the security interests of Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender in the Mortgaged Property; (b) the timing of the exercise of remedies by Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender under the Senior Loan Documents and the Subordinate Loan Documents, respectively; and (c) solely as between Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender, the notice requirements, cure rights, and the other rights and obligations which Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender have agreed to as expressly provided in this Agreement. Borrower acknowledges that the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not, and shall not be deemed to: extend Borrower’s time to cure any Senior Loan Default or Subordinate Loan Default, as the case may be; give Borrower the right to notice of any Senior Loan Default or Subordinate Loan Default, as the case may be other than that, if any, provided, respectively under the Senior Loan Documents or the Subordinate Loan Documents; or create any other right or benefit for Borrower as against Senior Lender or Subordinate Lender. 10. Rights and Obligations of Subordinate Lender Under the Subordinate Loan Documents and of Senior Lender under the Senior Loan Documents. Subject to each of the other terms of this Agreement, all of the following provisions shall supersede any provisions of the Subordinate Loan Documents covering the same subject matter: (a) Protection of Security Interest. Subordinate Lender shall not, without the prior written consent of Senior Lender in each instance, take any action which has the effect of increasing the indebtedness outstanding under, or secured by, the Subordinate Loan Documents, except that Subordinate Lender shall have the right to advance funds to cure Senior Loan Defaults pursuant to Section 8(a) and advance funds pursuant Page 261 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 11 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae to the Subordinate Loan Documents for the purpose of paying real estate taxes and insurance premiums, making necessary repairs to the Mortgaged Property and curing other defaults by Borrower under the Subordinate Loan Documents. (b) Condemnation or Casualty. Following the occurrence of (1) a Condemnation Action, or (2) a fire or other casualty resulting in damage to all or a portion of the Mortgaged Property (collectively, a “Casualty”), at any time or times when the Senior Security Instrument remains a lien on the Mortgaged Property the following provisions shall apply: (A) Subordinate Lender hereby agrees that its rights (under the Subordinate Loan Documents or otherwise) to participate in any proceeding or action relating to a Condemnation Action or a Casualty, or to participate or join in any settlement of, or to adjust, any claims resulting from a Condemnation Action or a Casualty shall be and remain subject and subordinate in all respects to Senior Lender’s rights under the Senior Loan Documents with respect thereto, and Subordinate Lender shall be bound by any settlement or adjustment of a claim resulting from a Condemnation Action or a Casualty made by Senior Lender; provided, however, this subsection or anything contained in this Agreement shall not limit the rights of Subordinate Lender to file any pleadings, documents, claims or notices with the appropriate court with jurisdiction over the proposed Condemnation Action or Casualty; and (B) all proceeds received or to be received on account of a Condemnation Action or a Casualty, or both, shall be applied (either to payment of the costs and expenses of repair and restoration or to payment of the Senior Loan) in the manner determined by Senior Lender in its sole discretion; provided, however, that if Senior Lender elects to apply such proceeds to payment of the principal of, interest on and other amounts payable under the Senior Loan, any proceeds remaining after the satisfaction in full of the principal of, interest on and other amounts payable under the Senior Loan shall be paid to, and may be applied by, Subordinate Lender in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Subordinate Loan Documents, provided however, Senior Lender agrees to consult with Subordinate Lender in determining the application of Casualty proceeds, provided further, however, that in the event of any disagreement between Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender over the application of Casualty proceeds, the decision of Senior Lender, in its sole discretion, shall prevail. (c) Insurance. Subordinate Lender agrees that all original policies of insurance required pursuant to the Senior Security Instrument shall be held by Senior Lender. The preceding sentence shall not preclude Subordinate Lender from requiring that it be named as a loss payee, as its interest may appear, under all policies of property damage insurance maintained by Borrower with respect to the Mortgaged Property, provided such action does not affect the priority of payment of the proceeds of property damage insurance under the Senior Security Instrument, or that it be named Page 262 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 12 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae as an additional insured under all policies of liability insurance maintained by Borrower with respect to the Mortgaged Property. (d) No Modification of Subordinate Loan Documents. Borrower and Subordinate Lender each agree that, until the principal of, interest on and all other amounts payable under the Senior Loan Documents have been paid in full, it will not, without the prior written consent of Senior Lender in each instance, increase the amount of the Subordinate Loan, increase the required payments due under the Subordinate Loan, decrease the term of the Subordinate Loan, increase the interest rate on the Subordinate Loan, or otherwise amend the Subordinate Loan terms in a manner that creates an adverse effect upon Senior Lender under the Senior Loan Documents. Any amendment of the Subordinate Loan Documents or assignment of Subordinate Lender’s interest in the Subordinate Loan without Senior Lender’s consent shall be void ab initio and of no effect whatsoever. 11. Modification or Refinancing of Senior Loan. Subordinate Lender consents to any agreement or arrangement in which Senior Lender waives, postpones, extends, reduces or modifies any provisions of the Senior Loan Documents, including any provision requiring the payment of money. Subordinate Lender further agrees that its agreement to subordinate hereunder shall extend to any new mortgage debt which is for the purpose of refinancing all or any part of the Senior Loan (including reasonable and necessary costs associated with the closing and/or the refinancing); and that all the terms and covenants of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of any holder of any such refinanced debt; and that all references to the Senior Loan, the Senior Note, the Senior Loan Agreement, the Senior Security Instrument, the Senior Loan Documents and Senior Lender shall mean, respectively, the refinance loan, the refinance note loan agreement, the mortgage securing the refinance note, all documents evidencing securing or otherwise pertaining to the refinance note and the holder of the refinance note. 12. Default by Subordinate Lender or Senior Lender. If Subordinate Lender or Senior Lender defaults in performing or observing any of the terms, covenants or conditions to be performed or observed by it under this Agreement, the other, non-defaulting lender shall have the right to all available legal and equitable relief. 13. Reinstatement. To the extent that Borrower makes a payment to Senior Lender or Senior Lender receives any payment or proceeds of the collateral securing the Senior Loan for Borrower’s benefit, which payment or proceeds or any part thereof are subsequently invalidated, declared to be fraudulent or preferential, set aside and/or required to be repaid to a trustee, receiver or any other party under any bankruptcy law, state or federal law, common law or equitable doctrine, then to the extent of such payment or proceeds received and not retained by Senior Lender, this Agreement shall be reinstated and continue in full force and effect until full and final payment shall have been made to Senior Lender. Subordinate Lender agrees to hold in trust for Senior Lender and promptly remit Page 263 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 13 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae to Senior Lender any payments received by Subordinate Lender after such invalidated, rescinded or returned payment was originally made. 14. Notices. (a) Process of Serving Notice. All notices under this Agreement shall be: (1) in writing and shall be: (A) delivered, in person; (B) mailed, postage prepaid, either by registered or certified delivery, return receipt requested; (C) sent by overnight courier; or (D) sent by electronic mail with originals to follow by overnight courier; (2) addressed to the intended recipient at the address(es) below the signature block, as applicable; and (3) deemed given on the earlier to occur of: (A) the date when the notice is received by the addressee; or (B) if the recipient refuses or rejects delivery, the date on which the notice is so refused or rejected, as conclusively established by the records of the United States Postal Service or any express courier service. (b) Change of Address. Any party to Agreement may change the address to which notices intended for it are to be directed by means of notice given to the other parties identified in this Agreement. (c) Receipt of Notices. Senior Lender, Subordinate Lender or Borrower shall not refuse or reject delivery of any notice given in accordance with this Agreement. Each party is required to acknowledge, in writing, the receipt of any notice upon request by the other party. 15. General. (a) Assignment/Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon Borrower, Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender and shall inure to the benefit of the respective legal successors, transferees and assigns of Page 264 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 14 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae Borrower, Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender. Borrower shall not assign any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Senior Lender. (b) No Partnership or Joint Venture. Senior Lender’s permission for the placement of the Subordinate Loan does not constitute Senior Lender as a joint venturer or partner of Subordinate Lender. Neither party hereto shall hold itself out as a partner, agent or Affiliate of the other party hereto. (c) Senior Lender’s and Subordinate Lender’s Consent. Wherever Senior Lender’s consent or approval is required by any provision of this Agreement, such consent or approval may be granted or denied by Senior Lender in its sole and absolute discretion, unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. Wherever Subordinate Lender’s consent or approval is required by any provision of this Agreement, such consent or approval may be granted or denied by Subordinate Lender in its sole and absolute discretion, unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. (d) Further Assurances. Subordinate Lender, Senior Lender and Borrower each agrees, at Borrower’s expense, to execute and deliver all additional instruments and/or documents reasonably required by any other party to this Agreement in order to evidence that the Subordinate Mortgage is subordinate to the lien, covenants and conditions of the Senior Loan Documents, or to further evidence the intent of this Agreement. (e) Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended except by written instrument signed by all parties hereto. (f) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is located without giving effect to any choice of law provisions thereof that would result in the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. Senior Lender, Subordinate Lender and Borrower agree that any controversy arising under or in relation to this Security Instrument shall be litigated exclusively in the jurisdiction in which the Mortgaged Property is located. The state and federal courts and authorities with jurisdiction in such locale shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies that arise under or in relation to this Agreement. The parties hereto irrevocably consent to service, jurisdiction, and venue of such courts for any such litigation and waive any other venue to which any might be entitled by virtue of domicile, habitual residence or otherwise. Page 265 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page 15 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae (g) Severable Provisions. If any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, then the other provisions of this Agreement, shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law. (h) Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue until the earliest to occur of the following events: (1) the payment in full of the principal of, interest on and other amounts payable under the Senior Loan Documents; (2) the payment in full of the principal of, interest on and other amounts payable under the Subordinate Loan Documents, other than by reason of payments which Subordinate Lender is obligated to remit to Senior Lender pursuant to Section 6 hereof; (3) the acquisition by Senior Lender of title to the Mortgaged Property pursuant to a foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure of, or the exercise of a power of sale contained in, the Senior Loan Documents; or (4) the acquisition by Subordinate Lender of title to the Mortgaged Property pursuant to a foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure of, or the exercise of a power of sale contained in, the Subordinate Loan Documents, but only if such acquisition of title does not violate any of the terms of this Agreement. (i) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original for all purposes; provided, however, that all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. (j) Sale of Senior Loan. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit Senior Lender’s (including any assignee or transferee of Senior Lender) right to sell or transfer the Senior Loan, or any interest in the Senior Loan. The Senior Loan or a partial interest in the Senior Loan (together with this Agreement and the other Loan Documents) may be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank] Page 266 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page S-1 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower, Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender have signed and delivered this Agreement under seal (where applicable) or have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered under seal (where applicable) by a duly authorized representative. Where applicable law so provides, Borrower, Senior Lender and Subordinate Lender intend that this Agreement shall be deemed to be signed and delivered as a sealed instrument. SENIOR LENDER: CBRE MULTIFAMILY CAPITAL, INC., a Delaware corporation By: (SEAL) Name: Title: Address: c/o CBRE Loan Services, Inc. 929 Gessner Road, Suite 1700 Houston, Texas 77024 With a copy to: Fannie Mae Attention: Multifamily Asset Management Drawer AM 1100 15th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Page 267 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page S-2 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae ACKNOWLEDGMENT BLOCK A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF ______________ :SS COUNTY OF ______________ On ______________ before me, ____________________________ (insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared _________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ____________________________ (Seal) (Signature of Notary Public) Page 268 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page S-3 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae SUBORDINATE LENDER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate and politic By: (SEAL) Name: Title: Address: ACKNOWLEDGMENT BLOCK A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF ______________ :SS COUNTY OF ______________ On ______________ before me, ____________________________ (insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared ______________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ____________________________ (Seal) (Signature of Notary Public) Page 269 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page S-2 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae BORROWER: LINC-PEPPERWOOD HOUSING INVESTORS, LP, a California limited partnership By: LINC Housing Corporation a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, its general partner By: Name: Title: Address: 3590 Elm Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90807 ACKNOWLEDGMENT BLOCK A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF ______________ :SS COUNTY OF ______________ On ______________ before me, ____________________________ (insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared ______________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ____________________________ (Seal) (Signature of Notary Public) Page 270 of 273 Subordination Agreement (Affordable) Form 6456 Page S-3 Fannie Mae 06-19 © 2019 Fannie Mae Exhibit A Legal Description Page 271 of 273 DATE:December 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Elisa C. Cox, Assistant City Manager Michael Parmer, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT:Consideration of City Council's Appointment of Their Respective Member to Cucamonga Valley Water District's Conservation Regulations Coalition. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council appoint their respective member as the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s representative on the Cucamonga Valley Water District’s Conservation Regulations Coalition. BACKGROUND: In 2018, the California State Legislature enacted Senate Bill 606 (Hertzberg) and Assembly Bill 1668 (Friedman) to establish a new foundation for long-term improvements in water conservation and drought planning to adapt to climate change and the longer and more intense droughts that are likely to result in California. Specifically, the legislation tasked the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) with providing regulation recommendations to the State Water Resources Control Board that would establish methodologies and guidelines to calculate the objectives; standards for efficient residential outdoor water use and efficient use of water on Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional (CII) landscapes with Dedicated Irrigation Meters (DIMs); CII performance measures; and annual reporting requirements. ANALYSIS: The proposed regulation creates a new framework for managing urban water use, by California’s largest water suppliers, by helping realize water savings proposed in the water supply strategy. While not the primary goal of the proposed regulation, implementation of the framework is likely to result in suppliers making investments and programmatic changes that encourage individuals, businesses, and local governments to change how they use water. The proposed rulemaking schedule included a first public comment period from August 18 – October 17, 2023. The State Water Resources Control Board will consider the proposed rulemaking for adoption in the summer of 2024 and, if adopted, the rule will become effective on October 24, 2024. In response to the proposed rulemaking, the Cucamonga Valley Water District is convening a Conservation Regulations Coalition to review and analyze the potential regional implications of the proposed statewide water use regulations, develop policy considerations, and coordinate advocacy efforts. To ensure the City and its interests are represented, it is recommended City Council appoint their respective member as the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s representative on the Cucamonga Valley Water District’s Conservation Regulations Coalition. Page 272 of 273 Page 2 2 1 4 2 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s Core Values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 273 of 273