Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-053 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NOT APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 96-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT FOR 14.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE, AND WEST OF ELM AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-352-62 THROUGH 69. A. Recitals. 1. Wohl/Rancho Partners has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 96-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 27, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and issued Resolution No. 96-17, recommending to the City Council that the associated Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 96-01 be denied; and on April 17, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 17, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: The application applies to approximately 14.45 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located south of Foothill Boulevard, north of Eucalyptus Street, east of Spruce Avenue, and west of Elm Avenue, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park; and Resolution No. 96-053 Page 2 RESOLUTION NOT APPROVED The property to the north of the subject site is designated Community Commercial and is partially developed. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is partially developed. The property to the east is designated Industrial Park and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is vacant. This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would have significant impacts on the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 96-01.