Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-100 - ResolutionsTHIS RESOLUTION SHOULD BE A ORDINANCE RESOLUTION NOT USED RESOLUTION NO. 95-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 95-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and on June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heating on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public heating on May 24, 1995, and to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 21, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park; and Resolution No. 95-100 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is in-part developed with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed. The property to the south is designated General Industrial and is in-part railroad right-of-way, in-part vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single family residences. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based on the environmental assessment, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. Resolution No. 95-100 Page 3 c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council approves Development District Amendment No. 95-01. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.