HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-123 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 94-123
A RESOLUTION OF ~{E CITY C0t~CIL OF T~E CITY OF PJtNC~0
(I~%MC~GA, (L%I/FC~UA, APPROVING G~N~%%L PLAN ~
94-01A TO AM~H) T~E ~ PLAN ~ ~SE MAP FR[~ OFFICE
EAST, AND MAKING ~INGS IN StaTiST ~DF - APN:
1077-421-58 A~H) 63.
1. On April 6, 1981, the City Council of the City of Rancho
~ approved the enautment of the General Plan by adoptic~ of ~olution
No. 81-40.
2. Western Land Properties has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 94-0/A as described in the title of this Resolution.
to as "the application."
3. On May 11, 1994, the Planning C~,,,,{.~ion of the City of Rancho
(kamamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
following the conclusion of said public hearing, _____adopted Resolution No. 94-37
rec~,,.,~nding to the City Council that said application be ap~ and a
Negative Declaration be issued.
4. On June 15, 1994, the City Ommcil of the City of Ranoho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said public hearing
prior to its adoption of this Resolution.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have oocurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deteradded, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho (k~am0n~a as follc~s:
1. This Oouncil hereby specifically fir~-~ that all of the facts set
forth in the ~ecitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
C~,i.'.{.~ion minutes, written and oral staff reports, together with ~ublic
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 25 acres of land,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Spruce Avenue and future Elm Avenue and is px~se~tly
vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and
ResolutionNo. 94-123
p e2
b. ~he px~0erty to the north of the subject site is designated
High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) and is vacant with a portion planned for park development. ~he pro~
with a c~m~ity shopping center. ~he ~ty to the east is designated
Industrial Park and is developed with a hotel and mjor portions are ~acant.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the T~d Use Policies
of the General Plan and will provide for develo$~ent within the district in a
manner o~sistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjaoent properties and would not have a significant impact
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follc~s:
a. The subject p~ is suitable for the uses permitted in
the proposed district in terms of access, size, and ompatibility with
b. Tb~ pro~ amendment would not have significant impacts on
the env~ nor the ~ t~perties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
4. Based upon the facts and information oontained in the p~
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the envir~al ~m~nt for the application, the City Oouncil finds that
there is no substantial eviv___~ce that the project will have a significant
effect t~on the e~Nir~ an~ rec~,.,~nds adoption of a Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in c~ml~liance with
the California Enviz~al Quality Act of 1970, as amended, an~ the State
Initial Study pre~ th~x~c~ reflect the i~ judgment of the City
info~-~tion co~tained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
Besolutic~ No. 94-123
b. ~ to the provisi~ of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California COde of Bs]ula~, the City Council fir~s as follows: In
for the ~roject, there is no evide~oe that the prc~ project will have
pote~t~ for an adverse impact ~ wildlife reeouroes or the b~hitat up0~
which wildlife ___~?_nds. Further, based ulxm s,!__l~tantial evidenoe ~ in
~__~_~ to t/me City C~il d~ri~ t/me ~1~ ~w~i~, t~ City (X~mcil
~ ~ the pre~on of ~ e~f~ as s~ f~ /n F~ion
V53.5(~14) of Title 14 of t/me <~lif~ (k~e of ~~.
5. Based upo~ the findings a~d o0~clusic~s set forth in
para~ 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Ooun~il her~ a~xDves General Plan
Am~e~ No. 94-01A, amending the ~ Plan Lan~ Uee Map frc~ Office to
Cu-,-,,unity ~ial for 25 acres of land bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the
sc~th, Spruce Avenue on the w~st, (hutch Street on the n~Th, and ~.lm Street
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, ~, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1994.
Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams
ABS~T: None
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
_~ '~~J. ~ City Clerk
I, D~RRA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.FRK of the city of Rancho O~monga, California, do
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho O~m~nga, California, at a
regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June, 1994.
Executed this 16th day of J%~e, 1994, at Rancho
California.
..... . City Clerk