The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About94-109 - ResolutionsRESOLUTIC~ NO. 94-109 A RESOI/3TIC~ OF THE CITY C0t~KIIL OF ~HE CITY OF RAN(~0 C[]CA~C4~, C~T.TF(~q~A, TO LEVY AND (I)rZ~ ~ WT/HIN IANDSCAPE )~/NT~%N~ DLg/RICT NOS. 1,2,3A, 3B,4,5,6,7 AND 8 Pt~S%~T TO ~ ~ ~ STgk~PLIGHTINGACTOF 1972 ~EAS, the City Council of the City of Ramoho O~m~3a d/dc~the 4th day of May, 1994, ____~_ its Resolutio~ of Intentic~ No. 94-088 to _order__ Districts Noe. 1,2,3A, 3B, 4,5,6,7 ar~ 8 ~ Beeolutio~ of ~c~ No. 94- 088wasdulyar~ legallypublished in thet/me, form andm~erasre~,~edby law, shown by the affidavit of Publicatio~ of saidBesolutic~of Intention on file in theOffice of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and cc~sidered evidence oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this prooeed/ng and cc~cernir~ the necessity for the contemplation w~rk and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, ~, the City fkamcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga~ hereby resolveas follc~s: SqDCTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requ~es the levy and collection of assessments within the t~nc].~..ape Maj3fcenanoe Districts Nos. 1,2,3A, 3B,4,5,6,7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1994/95, and said City Oouncil hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said P~solution of Intention No. 94-088, be done and made; and S~fION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Enginee~r is hereby finally approved; and S~2TION 3: Be it finally resolved that the ass~m~Tts for Fiscal Year 1994/95 method of assessment in the Eng~'s Report are hereby PASSED, ~, and ADOPlOD this 1st day of June, 1994. Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Williams Charles J. ~ Mayor Pro T~~~ Resolution No. 94-109 ~ De~-a J. ~, City Clerk' I, DWRDA J. ADAMS, CITY c[.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho O~monga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Oouncil held on the /st day of June, 1994. Ew~uted this 2rid day of June, 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Besoluticn No. 94-109 Pa~3 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J.(.O'Neil, City Engineer Resolution No. 94-109 Page4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 29.94 acres of landscape area and 38.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and parks. The 38.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5 acres of Church Street Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.47 Turf 1.47 1.47 Parks 28.25 38.25 Community Trails 7.00 7.00 Total Area in LMD #1 68.19Acres 68.19 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs and the maintenance of the parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: Resolution No. 94-109 P'acje 5 Proposed Maintenance Budsget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Befiefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Athletic Light Maintenance Tree Inventory Field Data Collection Capital Expenditures A.D.A. Tot Lot Retrofit - Bear Gulch Park Capital Project Outlay Capital Equipment Outlay Capital Vehicles Outlay General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $49,510.00 $ 18,320.00 $39,740.00 $16,310.t10 $1,000.00 $285,000.00 $145,600.00 $12,000.00 $13,000.00 $7,550.O0 $30,000.00 $147,900.00 $1,550.00 $8,650.0t) $8,26(}.00 $145,000.00 $42.000.00 $ 971,390.00 $119,220.00 $ 145.410.00 $264,630.00 Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover $1,236,020.00 <$294,000.00> Assessment Revenue Required $942,020.00 For 94/95 the Capital Project Outlay budgeted for the district is as follo~vs; $13,000 for a Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades, $600 for Irrigation Controller Improvements, $5,000 for Tot Lot deck replacement at East Beryl Park, $3,tX}O for tot lot deck replacement at Church Street Park, $8,000 roof repair at Bear Gulch and Chuch Street Parks, $8/000 for parkway street tree repalcement throughout the district,S12,000 for landscape maintenance material replacement, $1,430 for Haven Avenue Median moisture sensors, $16,250 for irrigation improvements to control parks, $1,200 for MWD lease for East and West Beryl Parks and $79,420 for irrigation improvements to contol parkways. Capital Equipment Outlay of $1,550 is for 27% of the purchase price of two shared personnel computers for the Landscape Maintenance Supervisors. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $3,850 is for 12% of a 1/2 ton flat bed truck for the Tree Maintenance Crew and $4,800 for 34% of a 4WD utility vehicle for the Trails Crew. There is also $30,000 under Capital Improvement Projects for Phase [ of ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) Retrofit to Bear Gulch Park. Resoluti~ No. 94-109 pa 6 Analysis: Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #1 decreased from $946,710 in 93/94 to $942,040 in 94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $37,000 for the upcoming year, this is due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild summer. These factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain constant. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The FY 94/95 assessment rate is $92.21, this is no increase over FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Rat~ Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel 7,833 $92.21 1.0 $92.21 Multi-Family Parcel 4,766 $92.21 0.5 $46.11 Totals Revenue $722,270 $219.7650 $942,020 ~luti~ No. 94-109 Page7 .i I I Besolutio~No. 94-109 Page8 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU- 2AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU- 2AU Resoluti~ No. 94-109 pa~9 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 2 3 LEG[NO -'-~ DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIl. DENOTES STREET LIGHT SCALE f',SO' .~.,. CITY OF RANCHO ¢UCAMONGA ;11~~ COUNTYOP SANBERNARDINO~,M 117~8 · . ~ STATE OF CALIPORNIA ~x~,~ "~ ,, Resolutio~ No. 94-109 Page 10 & A ~0~ ~ A ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STFIEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D~STIIiiCT NOS. 1 AND 2 .!.i~~.,~OITY OP RANOHO C)UGAMONGA OOUNTY Oil SAN BERNARDINO Y~'~ .i STATE O' ¢ALI,OIIINIA Besolutiorl No. 94-109 Pac3e 11 AEN%qRONMENTAL HIGHTECH ENGINEERING · CZ%~. ~'_-'~/MJNG Resoluti~ No. 94-109 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. (Victoria Planned Community) 2 Fiscal Year 1994/95 · 249 App roved :.//~//-~~'.~ ,~/'~/-,~ ~ William J. O':~ei'I, City Engineer No. 94-109 Page 13 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Backg;round: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, Community Trails and parks. The 27.5 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 47.99 47.99 Turf 40.13 40.13 Parks 27.50 27.50 Community Trails 3.00 3.00 Total Area in LMD #2 118.62 Acres 118.62 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: 1%esoluti(11 No. 94-109 Page 14 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Overtime Salaries Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Mileage Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures ADA Retrofit to Windrows,Kenyon, Groves & Vintage Parks Capital Improvement Projects Capital Vehicle Outlay Capital Equipment Outlay General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Requi red $355,830.00 $5,O00.00 $4,650.00 $ 131,660.00 $65,720.00 $10,000.00 $0.O0 $ 1,000.00 $539,200.00 $10,000,00 $140,000.00 $336,900.00 $26,700.00 $3,850.00 $11,390.00 $350,000.00 $20,000.00 $2,011,900.00 $143,410.00 $107,380.00 $250,790.00 $2,262,690.00 <$551,190.00> $1,711,500.00 For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $140,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) retrofit to Windrows, Kenyon, Groves and Vintage Parks. This retrofit will update the play equipment and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A compliance. Also Budgeted is $8,000 to replace the tot lot bridge at Kenyon Park and $5,000 to replace the exercise station. $320,400 for various renovations and improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation systems. $20,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital Equipment Outlay of $3,850 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $26,7t~1 to purchase 17°,'o of a 1.5 ton flat bed truck w/ dump, 50% tof a utility, truck and 27% (If a 4WD utility vehilce for trails. Analysis: In FY 93/94, the Assessment rate for LMD #2 was $422.(~3. [t is recommended this rate not increase for the FY 94/95. Part of the reason that the rate did not increase is due to the fact Resoluti~No. 94-109 Page 15 that water usage is down partly because of the implementation of the Calsense Moisture Control irrigation system and partly because of the increased rainfall last season. Also, there is a fairly large FY 93/94 carryover that helps offset the overal~ costs. There were no new assessments units added to the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use Type Units Ra ~e Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 3,763.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $1,587,990 Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $52,330 Commercial Acre 32.02 $422.00 2.0 $844.00 $27,020 Vacant Acre 418.6~, $422.00 0.25 $105.50 $44,160 TOTALS 4,400.74 $1,711,500 Re~oluticma No. 94-109 Page 16 Resoluti(x~ No. 94-109 Page 17 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved: ]%s~olutio~ No. 94-109 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 armual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~ound: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD #3a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14 Turf 0.00 0.00 Total Area in LMD #3a 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The proiected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3a are as follows: Resoluticm No. 94-109 Page 19 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations Controller Cabinet Safety Improvement General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 $0.00 $1,530.00 $1,400.00 $20O.O0 $30.00 $600.00 $120.00 $4,080.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency $270.00 $220.00 $490.00 Gross Revenue Required: $4,570.00 Less: 93/94 District Carryover <$1,260.00> Total Revenue Required: $3,310.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $1,400.00 landscape plant material renovation. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 94/95. Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rate for LMD #3a will remain at $413.74 for the FY 94/95 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. The tax delinquency represents the estimated amount of unpaid taxes within the district. No new assessments were annexed into the district this year. FY 9ad95Assessrnent Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit I and Use Type Units Rate Factor Industrial Parcel 8 $413.74 1.0 Ra re/. A.U. Revenue $413.74 $3,310.00 Resoluti(xi No. 94-109 Page 20 Rssolutic~ No. 94-109 Page 21 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b ( Commercial / Ind us trial) Fiscal Year 1994/95 illiam J. 0 Ne~b,~ity Engineer Resolution No. 94-109 Page 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. This fiscal year approximately 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Complex (this does not include the Stadium and its parking lots and maintenance building) will be accepted into this district for maintainance. The Adult Sports Complex with its three softball fields, two soccer fields and 90 foot combination field all with sports field lighting and bleacher seating was designed to cater to the adult sports leagues. For this reason the Complex was located in the commercial and industrial of the City to benefit the adult work force within the area. Detailed maintenance activities for the Complex to be maintained by the district include but are not limited to the following: The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilization or treating for disease or injury: the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance , repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, the removal of graffitti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of the parking lot surfacing and striping, parking lot sweeping, the maintenance and repair of all lighting facilities and the maintenance and repair for restroom facilities. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 6.74 6.74 Turf 3.29 3.29 Parks 0.00 22.87 Total Area in LMD #3b 10.(B Acres 32.90Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Besolutiom No. 94-109 Page 23 Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3b are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3b are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance -Parkways & Medians Tree Maintenance Landscape Maintenance - Sports Complex Complex Drainage Capital Expenditures Controller Cabinet Safety Improvements Landscape Plant Material Renovations Haven Median Irrigation Improvements Calsense Connections to Central Capital Equipment Outlay / Equipment General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Requirecl: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $65,360.00 $24,180.1.)0 $28,060.00 $1,03t).t)O $1,000.00 $162,780.t}0 $30,000.00 $92,040.00 $15,000.00 $3,200.00 $10,000.00 $7,950.t)0 $10,000.00 $6,450.00 $5,860.00 $136,000.00 $81,200.00 $680,110.00 $39,150.00 $25,640.00 $64,790.0t) $744,9t)0.00 <$23t),290.tk)> $514,610.00 Analysis: It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $352.80 for the fiscal year 1994/95. The tax delinquency represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Besoluti(x~ No. 94-109 Page 24 Unit No. of Assess. Land Use Type Units Rate Industrial/Comm. Acre 1341.02 $352.80 Other-Revenue: User fees from Sports Field Lighting TOTAL Unit Rate/ Factor A.U. Revenue 1.0 $352.80 $473,110 $41,500 $514,610 Resolutio~l No. 94-109 Page 25 1%e~olutio~l NO. 94-109 Page 26 Legal Descriptions Parcel "B# Being portions of Lot Nos. 20, 21, 22; and portions of the westerly 1/2 and the westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of Lots 23 and 24 according to the Map of Rochester as per plat recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the southerly 50.00 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of said Lot 24 ac~:ording to said Map of Rochester; THE~CR N 00 degrees 09 minutes 28 seconds E along the easterly line of the westerly 1/2 of the easterly 1/2 of said Lots 24 and 23 a distance of 617.60 feet; THE~CE M 89 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds E a distance of 276.30; TI{~C~ M 00 degrees 25 minutes seconds a distance of 43.00 feet; T~R~CK S 89 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds W a distance of 133.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly, having a radius of 78.00 feet, a radial through said point bears N 13 degrees 25 minutes 24 seconds W; T~ westerly along said curve through a central angle of 09 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds an arc length of 13.09 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; TH~[C~westerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds an arc length of 30.79 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; TH~[CK westerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds an arc length of 30.79 feet t o point on a tangent ourwe concave northerly having a radius of 310.00 feet; TH~C~westerly along said curve through a central angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes 43 seconds an arc length of 83.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line, a radial line to said curve; THE~CE N 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds E along said line a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 300.00 feet, a radial through said point bears S 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 25 degrees 05 minutes 21 seconds an arc length of 131.37 feet to a point on a tangent line; T~ N 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds # along said line a distance of 33.50 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 368.50 feet a radial through said point bears S 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 20 degrees 32 minutes 20 seconds an arc length of 132.10 feet to a point on a tangent line; THR~CK along said line N 19 degrees 38 minutes ~0 seconds E a distance of 131.18 feet; THR~Cl M 71 de~rees 21 minutes 30 seconds a distance of 46.22 feet; TH~C~ N 70 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds W a distance of 46.22 feet; THE~C~ N 19 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds E a distance of 8.32 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 12.00 feet; TH~CR northeasterly northerly and northwesterly along said curve through a Resolutio~ No. 94-109 Page 27 Legal Descriptions (continued) central angle of 103 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds an arc length of 21.58 feet to a point on a tangent line; THENCE N 83 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds W along said line a distance of 2.35 feet; THENCE S 89 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds W a distance of 201.56 feet; TRR~CB 85 degrees 05 minutes 12 seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; west a distance of 89.63 feet; THENCE S 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W a distance of 35.62 feet; THRICE sou~h a distance of 58.38 feet; T~IENCE west a distance of 36.00 feet; THriCE north a distance of 116.54 feet; THENCE N 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W a distance of 35.62 feet; THENCE west a distance of 116.54 feet; TIi~IIC~ north a distance of 36.00 feet; THENCE east a distance of 58.38 feet; ~ N 45 degrees O0 minutes 00 seconds E a distance of 35.62 feet; T~CE north a distance of 89.63 feet; THENCE N 04 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; THENC~ N O0 de~rees 31 minutes 30 seconds E a distance of 189.49 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 52.50 feet; T!!ll~C~westerly along said curve through a central angle of 07 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds an arc length of 6.52 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 35.50 feet; T~wssterly along said curve through a central angle of 26 degrees 26 minutes 17 seconds an arc length of 16.38 feet to a point an a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 2.50 feet; ~ westerly, southwesterly and southerly along said curve through a central of 96 degrees 23 minutes 14 seconds an arc length of 4.21 feet to a point on a tangent line; TH~CE S 00 degrees 15 minutes 23 seconds E along said line a distance of 16.35 feet; T~ S 89 degrees 44 minutes 37 seconds W a distance of 15.53 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 310.50; T~l~¥J~westerly and southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 62 degrees 10 minutes 21 seconds an arc length of 336.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line; T!IE~CB # 62 degrees 20 minutes 12 seconds W along said line a distance of 83.03 feet to the westerly line of said Lots 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24; T~CB S 00 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds W along said line a distance of 1367.79 feet to the northwest corner of the southerly 50.00 feet of said Lot 24; T!~ M 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds B along the southerly line of said Lot 24 a distance of 41.19 feet; T!~ M 44 degrees, 28 minutes, 07 seconds E a distance of 33.94 feet; TH~ ~ 89 degrees, 28 minutes, 07 seconds E a distance of 52.50 feet; TH~ # 45 degrees 3! minutes 53 seconds W a distance of 33.94 feet; TH~C~ M 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds W a distance of 14.00 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave westerly having a radius of 320.50; TH~N~ northerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 26 minutes 59 seconds an arc length of 125.58 feet to a tangent line; T!~M 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds W along said line a distance of 61.96 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 62.47 feet; THENC~ easterly along said curve through a central angle 35 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds an arc length of 39.11 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northwesterly having & radius of 2.50 Legal Descriptions (continued) Resolutic~ No. 94-109 Pag~ 28 feet; THENCE easterly, northeasterly and northerly along said curve through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 3.93 feet to a point on atangent line; TH~CI N 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds W along said inea distance of 16.50 feet; THENCE N 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds E a distance of 420.35 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 20.00 feet; THENCE easterly, southeasterly and southerly along said curve through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 31.42 feet to a point on a tangent line; TH~C! S 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds E along said line a distance of 228.50 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 24; TH~CE M 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds E along said line a distance of 384.02 feet to the TR~ POINT OF B~GINMING. AREA PARCEL 'Be = 996,430.01 Square Feet or 22.87 A~ree Resolutic~t No. 94-109 Pacje 29 o o. ,"4. U~ O ~. Z -- MAP TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION IEXHIBIT "A"l. I IEXHIBIT "B". --SEE DETAIL "A" EXHIBIT "C" L~.LJ ! EEE DETAIL 'C'-- z~ ' '~IT 'C' -- - ~2 Z "~.'", . PARCEL 'B' 22 O .J .J ,_,1 I- SOUTHERLY LINE LOT / /--'--'SEE DETAIL '"1~ - -- /Ex.,e,'r "c" ~: -% ,/ ~ I . _~_,,~,,~ '.-..-_ o.. _ / , /I /.~L.u ~oe,, Y ' ,'"'~'~- 24 ~. ,,. ~ o6~.o / .-- __C/._ .~.~,. PARCEL D~ "h 3.fig ;" ,- 3O3 · ' ~ ..J ~- )- I ~ ,'-"V-'c;' ~ ~L- . ~.C-~' LL'-' ~t- %4 .~ "r"~',r~ ."~',~n'r tEXIST. STREET ..... SOUTHERLY LINE LOT 24 "'" EASEMENT FOR STREET HIGHWAY AND RELATED PURPOSES PAGE ! OF m Resoluti~ No. 94-109 Page 3o lib q~ttltttttlttlllllllllltll - IIIII!1111111111111111111F'~ ~11111111111111111111r __~ - , ~ Resoluti~ No. 94-109 Pag~ 31 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #3B ANNEXA//ONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47 AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37 AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5 AU 1%~011zti(xl No. 94-109 Pac3e 32 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Resoluti~ No. 94-109 Page 33 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 g STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 5 1080'1 JERSEY S~A&g: I": ~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA* COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA cu Besolutic~ No. 94-109 Pac3e 34 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 Z. 2,99 PEr 4 c,TY o, RANCHO COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resoluti(x~ No. 94-109 Page 35 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. O'Ne~ity Engineer Beeolutic~ No. 94-109 P'4~je 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Backffround: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. There is approximateIt 1.25 acres of parking lot for Milliken Park added to the district this year for maintenance. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94 / 95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 8.35 8.35 Turf 6.58 6.58 Parks 27.00 28.25 Total Area in LMD #4 41.89 Acres 43.14Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows: Resoluti~No. 94-109 Page 37 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Mileage Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay / Projects Terra Vista / Base Line Median Renovation ADA Retrofit: Milliken & Coyote Canyon Parks Capital Outlay / Equipment Capital Outlay / Vehicles General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $168,980.(.)0 $4,650.00 $62,520.00 $42,600.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $1,000.00 $211,990.00 $7,t)Ot).00 $126,930.00 $413,780.00 $90,()00.00 $2,300.00 $41,041.).00 $5,180.00 $120,000.00 $23,150.00 $1,351,120.00 $82,660.00 $106,440.00 $189,100.00 $1,540,221.).00 <$494,670.(g)> $1,045,550.00 For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $90,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) retrofit to Milliken and Coyote Canyon Parks. This retrofit will update the play equipment and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is $5,0tX) for exercise station replacement, $7400 for controller cabinet retrofits to meet new code requirements, $3,730 for Haven Avenue Median irrigation upgrades and $5,000 for drainage correction to West Greenway, $95,8tX) for various renovations and improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation systems and $10,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital Equipment Outlay of $2,300 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $41,040 to purchase 65% of a 1.5 ton flat bed truck w/ dump, 50% of a utility truck and 19% of a 4WD utility vehilce for trails. Analysis: Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #4 increased from $1,033,740 in FY 93/94 to $1,045,550 in FY 94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $10,930 for the upcoming year, this is due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild Resolutic~ No. 94-109 Pa~je 38 summer. These factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allo~ved the recommended asses>ment rate to remain constant. In FY 93/94 the assessment rate for LMD #4 was 252.50/A.U. It is recommended not to increase for the FY 94/95. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation Chart. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. Land Use Type Units A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1659.00 $252.50 $418,90t) Multi Parcel 2610.00 $222.00 $579,420 Commercial Acre 122.20 $382.99 $46,800 Vacant Acre l 1.44 $37.12 $430 TOTAL $1,045,550 Resolution No. 94-109 Page 40 Rs~oluti~m No. 94-109 Page 41 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approve d/~W~.H l~m~la ~O,~/E n gi~~n~r¢Au~ u,-- Resolutic~ No. 94-109 Page 42 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No, 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped Tot Lot, located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those specific parcels. There is only one site maintained by the district. It consists of a Tot Lot and a small amount of shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities of maintained areas consist of: Ground Cover and Shrubs Total Area in LMD #5 92/93 9~/94 0.33 0.33 0.33 Acres 0.33 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: Besol~onNo. 94-109 l>age43 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A Survey for Tot Lot Irrigation Upgrades to Replace Risers w/Pop Ups Landscape Material Renovation Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Add: 93/94 Gross Revenue Required: District Deficit Total Revenue Required: S0 50 $490.00 $70.00 $1,060.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200.00 $30.00 $280.00 $130.00 $2,260.00 $610.00 $90.00 $7i)0.i)() $2960.00 $2020.00 $4,980.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $200.00 for a controller cabinet safety upgrade. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $113.29. It is recommended that there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Unib~ Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 44 $113.29 1.0 $113.29 $4,980.00 Resoluti~ No. 94-109 Pac3e 44 , Resolutio~ No. 94-109 Page 45 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved: William J. O;Neil, City Engineer Resolut{~ No. 94-109 Page 46 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and paseos. 8.39 acres of maintained landscape area will be accepted into the district this fiscal year, these areas include portions of Milliken Ave parkway and median, Banyan Street parkway and various landscape areas for Tracts Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13758. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 12.09 19.34 Turf 2.89 3.94 Community Trails 3.00 Total Area in LMD #6 17.89 Acres 26.28Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as fi~llows: Besolutic~ No. 94-109 Page 47 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Reg. Vehicle Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovation Capital Outlay/Equipment Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades Tree Replanting General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Ad ministration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $35,930.00 $13,290.00 $4,540.00 $1,910.00 $500.00 $160,130.00 $10,500.00 $15,000.00 $1,080.00 $3,0{)0.00 $1,500.00 $2,670.00 $60,000.00 $2,550.00 $312,600.00 $27,000.00 $13,410.00 $40,410.00 $353,010.00 < $64.t)50.00> $288,960.00 Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $246.97. [t is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units were annexed in the district. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. ! and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 $246.97 1.0 $246.97 $288,960.00 Resolutic~ No. 94-109 Pac3e 48 Z No. 94-109 Pac3e 49 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994/95 ~'. ~\~-*,_',:, Willia~ J. 0'~, Engineer City 1%~olutic~ No. 94-109 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Backffround: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.54 7.54 Turf 4.02 4.02 Community Trails 2.00 2.00 Total Area in LMD #7 13.56Acres 13.56 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as filllows: l~e~olutic~ No. 94-109 Page 51 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capita[ Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations Weed Abatement for N.E. Community Park Site Capital Outlay / Equipment Controller Cabinet Safety Retrofit Tree Replantings Calsense Connections to Central General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Refunding Contingency Subtotal: Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $2,300.00 $850.00 $3,980.00 $1,330.00 $500.00 $83,5OO.0O $ l 8,500.00 $10,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,400.00 $5,500.00 $25,000.00 $1,510.00 $16,000. O0 $740.00 $178,610.00 $26,740.00 $204,070.00 $200,000.0t) $430,810.00 $609,420.00 <$306.050.00> $3O3,37O.O0 For 94/95 the district budgeted $10,000 for landscape plant material renovation and $6,(X10 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site. There is $1,500 for equipment purchases , $1,400 for controller cabinet safety retrofit, $5,500 for tree replantings and $25,000 for calsense connections to central control budgeted for in 94/95. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. The refunding contingency in an amount of $200,000 will refund those property owners who are current on their property taxes a surplus of funds within the district. Analysis: The FrY 94/95 rate of assessment is $307.05 per unit. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. There has been only one assessemnt unit annexed to the district. Each single family property owner will receive a refund of approximately $2(~.) during the FY 94/95. The reason for this refund is a surplus of funds due to the fact that properties have been annexed into the district but all of the landscape improvements for those areas have not been completed and as of yet have not been accepted into the district for maintenance. In future years landscape areas Resolutic~ No. 94-109 Page 52 within the annexed tracts will come on line and add to the overall maintenance costs of the distrist. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. lmnd Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 988.(,)0 $307.05 1.0 $307.05 $303,370.00 Resolution No. 94-109 Page 53 CI i ~olutic~ No. 94-109 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. CY.~eil, City Engineer l~oluti~m No. 94-109 Page 55 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the South Eftwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.23 0.23 Turf 0.06 0.14 Community Trails 0.00 0.00 Total Area in LMD #8 0.29 Acres 0.37 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: Besoluti(x~ No. 94-109 Page 56 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contingency Tree Replacement Contract Service: Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control Capital Outlay / Equipment Landscape Plant Material Replacement Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $0 $o $600.00 $370.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $200.00 $150.00 $1,360.00 $80.00 $15,260.00 $1,780.00 $4,150.00 $5,930.00 $21,190.00 <$4,840.00> $16,350.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $2,000 for landscape plant material replacement and $200 for controller cabinet safety upgrade as capital improvement projects. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $151.45. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 108.00 $151.45 1.0 $151.45 $16,350.00 Be~olutior~ No. 94-109 Pac3e 57