Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/04/24 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTO C PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 24, 1996 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA III. IV. go Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Lumpp Announcements Approval of Minutes December 13, 1995 January 10, 1996 Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 96-01 - SANBAG - A request to designate an existing residence and accessory structures (Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence and workshop - National Register Eligible), located at 9553 Highland Avenue - APN: 202-101-18. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03. go ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-01 - SANBAG - A request to move an existing residence and accessory structures (Sam and Allreda Maloof residence and workshop), from 9553 Highland Avenue to a 5.54 acre site in the Very Low (VL) zone located at the southeast comer of Carnelian and Almond Streets - APN: 1061-281-16. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Related files: Landmark Designation 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03. VI. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII. Commission Business VIII. Adjournment 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi.15, that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 18, 1996, at least 72 hours prior.to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964. 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. VICINITY MAP h I A.T.& S.F. RR CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 24, 1996 Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation\Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner LANDMARK DESIGNATION 96-01 - SANBAG - A request to designate an existing residence and accessory structures (Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence and workshop - National Register eligible), located at 9553 Highland Avenue APN: 202-101-18. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-01 - SANBAG - A request to move an existing residence and accessory structures (Sam and AIfreda Maloof residence and workshop), from 9553 Highland Avenue to a 5.54 acre site in the Very Low (VL) zone located at the southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets - APN: 1061-281-16. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Related files: Landmark Designation 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-09 - SANBAG ~ A request to convert a relocated residence and accessory structures (Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence and workshop) to a House and Workshop Museum (Arts and Crafts Center), located on a 5.54 acre site in the Very Low (VL) zone located at the southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets APN: 1061-281-16. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Related files: Landmark Designation 96-01, Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, and Design Review 96-03. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW 96-03 - SANBAG - A request to construct a new residence on a 5.54 acre site in the Very Low (VL) zone located at the southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets - APN: 1061-281-16. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Related files: Landmark Designation 96-01, Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, and Conditional Use Permit 96-09. ITEM A, B HPC/PC STAFF REPORT LD 96-01, LAP 96-01, CUP 96-09, & DR 96-03- SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 2 ao Go Background: The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), as the designated transportation planning agency for San Bernardino County, has filed the subject applications in order to comply with the mitigation measures required within the Master Environmental Impact_Statement (MEIS) for the Route 30 Freeway extension. The planned Freeway extension would have adversely impacted the existing Maloof residence and accessory structures, which were identified in the MEIS as a National Register eligible historic/cultural -resource. In accordance with Federal regulations, SANBAG explored several alternatives with the Maloofs; and the current relocation alternative was chosen as the preferred mitigation. A detailed background and project description is contained in the applicant's submittal included with the initial study (Exhibit "L"). General Plan Designations: The project site, as well as all surrounding properties, is designated Very Low (VL) Density (0-2 dwelling units per acre). Site Characteristics: The proposed relocation site is approximately 6 gross acres in size, and is presently an abandoned citrus grove. This site has a natural water course that is located on the east side and Eucalyptus tree rows on the north and east property lines. The general grade of the property is approximately 8 percent and slopes from north to south consistent with the general pattern of the area. The site was chosen after a review of similar sites throughout the Alta Loma area in order to find a site that closely conforms to the existing site on Highland Avenue. Parkinq Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided New 2 bedroom 2,448 2 covered 2 2 residence (approx.) per unit Relocated residence (converted to Museum/ Arts and Crafts Center) Relocated/reconstructed guest house 6,312 1 per employee 22 22 + I per 3 visitors (60 visitors maximum) 593 1 per artist in residence 2 2 (maximum 2) Relocated/reconstructed workshops TOTAL 3,692 1 per employee 3 3 (maximum 3) 29 29 HPC/PC STAFF REPORT LD 96-01, LAP 96-01, CUP 96-09, & DR 96-03 - SAN BAG April 24, 1996 Page 3 ANALYSIS: Historic Landmark Designation. Landmark Alteration, Conditional Use Permit, Design Review: Landmark Designation - Documentation prepared as part of the Cultural Resource Review for the Route 30 Freeway MEIS and subsequently reviewed by the California Office of Historic Preservation (C©HP) determined the existing residence and workshop buildings qualified as National Register eligible structures. A copy of the previous cultural resource documentation is attached for reference (Exhibit "L"). The determination of a National Register level significance clearly demonstrates that the site and buildings meet the City's criteria for landmark designation. Landmark Alteration - The relocation of the landmark structures as part of a federally funded freeway project requires the review and concurrence of the California Office of Historic Preservation and compliance with the Federal Secretary of Interior Standards for alterations. The required compliance with California Office of Historic Preservation will assure that the alterations for the Landmark will be minimized and treated sensitively. Conditional Use Permit - Pursuant to Section 17.08.030(7) Uses Within Recognized Historic Structures, "Historic structures within a Residential District may be used for uses other than residential" subject to a Conditional Use Permit and subject to four criteria contained in Subsections (a) through (d). The essential evaluation before the Commission is contained in Subsection (b) which states: "Any use proposed shall not cause intensification or disruption to any adjacent uses or neighborhood." In staff's opinion, the proposed use will not cause an intensification or disruption to the area for the following reasons: The basic operation of the Maloof's custom furniture construction and tours of the grounds, house, and arts and crafts collection is essentially the same as currently exists at the present location on Highland Avenue. In researching the current activities, staff was unable to find any history or evidence of conflict or nuisance with the adjacent neighborhood during its many years of operation. The new proposed site is adequately buffered from adjacent uses with streets bordering on all four sides. Given the limitations proposed within the application restricting the number of employees (2 foundation, 3 arts and crafts, and 2 artists in residence) and maximum 60 visitors no more than four times per week, the applicant's engineer has projected an average maximum of 62 trips per day compared to 80 trips per day if the site were to develop at the allowed density of eight single family residences. Design Review - The site layout and orientation are designed with the following influences and characteristics: The relocated and replicated structures are located and oriented to match the historically accurate layout at the existing site on Highland Avenue. Such historical .,,A, HPC/PC STAFF REPORT LD 96~01, LAP 96-01, CUP 96-09, & DR 96-03- SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 4 accuracy is mandated by the N_ational Register criteria. Another example is the proposed driveway from Almond Street, which is designed primarily for ceremonial purposes only. The major access for the House Museum/Arts and Crafts Center is via __th_e double driveway on Carnelian Street. 2. The new residence is oriented to Hidden Farm Road with a separate access. The separate access to Hidden Farm Road will assure the Maloof family residence privacy during foundation activities. 3. The site is proposed to be surrounded by decorative metal fencing to provide security. The proposed new residence is designed to match the architectural style of the relocated and replicated structures. The architectural features are of a rustic rural flavor with exposed board-on-board siding and a blue colored metal standing seam roof. The applicant is requiring the recordation of a conservation easement on the property that will assure the site is maintained in the same manner it is proposed, thereby precluding any additional subdivision and development of the site. Therefore, in staffs opinion, the proposal is consistent with the area and the appropriate provisions of the General Plan. Go Neiahborhood Meetinq: On March 30, 1996, the Applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting at the existing Maloof residence on Highland Avenue. Approximately half of the 48 property owners, applicant representatives, and City staff attended the meeting. The meeting included a tour of the house and workshops and a presentation on the proposed project. Although the attendees had several questions the overall reaction was positive. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Henderson) reviewed the development submittal on April 2, 1996, and unanimously recommended approval as presented. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the development submittal and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is in conformance with applicable standards and ordinances. E. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was completed and a Negative Declaration was ' prepared and is attached hereto for reference. FACTS FOR FINDING: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant environmental impacts. The Facts for Finding for each action are contained in the applicable attached Resolutions. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the site has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. HPC/PC STAFF REPORT LD 96-01, LAP 96-01, CUP 96-09, & DR 96-03 - SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 5 At the time this report was written, staff had received one letter from a neighboring property owner (Exhibit "P") who could not attend the public hearing. The letter indicated two concerns. The first question had to do with the new drainage pipe under Hidden Farm Road. The applicant's engineer contact_ed t__h_e_neighbor and answered the concern with regards to drainage: The second concern had to do with street lights which he did not feel would benefit the rural atmosphere. It was explained that the street lights are a public safety policy required by the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Landmark Designation 96-01, Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. City Planner BB:LH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "1" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Exhibit "L" Exhibit "M" ' . Exhibit "N" ~ Exhibit "O" Exhibit "P" Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Site Utilization Map Detailed Site Plan - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Site Elevation - Phasing Plan - Natural Features Map - Grading Map Slope Profile Map Slope Profiles New House Elevations/Floor Plans and Sections - Existing Site, Elements, and Building Plans Architectural Inventory Evaluation Form - Initial Study - Drainage Report - Traffic Analysis Correspondence from Neighboring Property Owner Recommending Approval Of Landmark Designation 96-01 of Approval for Landmark Alteration 96-01 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 96-09 of Approval for Design Review 96-03 i Z 0 oo '/ < , ! : . .. , .................... . ............... . .....~.; ......... L~ UJ _ I .A, B-14' ~_~ t~ W ._~ L~ C~ / V I I L-I. ..l I I I It -H I I 0 0 0 I -- i z ..., 0 Z~.' 0 0 I .. :~-~l I I I , I [ .....1 0 / I I I J I I I .% 0 2:; / / , I 1 z o ~ ~ 1l I o o I.~ I.. CALIFO,~NJA DEPARTMENT OF TRAHSPORTATION ARCHITECTURAL INVENTORY/EVALUATION FORM County. Route - Postmile: SBd 30 0.0/22.8 ( ) (x) .ID E N';q F-7 CAT) ON MAP REFr:P, EN,.,E NO. 32 (supplement) LISTF_D ( ) DETERMINED ELIGIBLE APPEATIS ELIGIBL~ ( ) APPEARS INELIGIBLE 1.Common Numa: Sam and Airreda Maleof Residence and SIudio 2.HlstorJc~qamo: same 3.Str0et or rural address: City.'_ Pzancho Cuc;~monga (AII~ Lama) 4.ParcelNumber: 202-101.01 and -18 Address: 9553 Highland Avenu~ 5.Ownershlp is: ( ) Public (x) 6. Present U'~e: Flesldonoo and studio 9553 Highland Avenue Zip Cod~: 91701 County: S.~n Bernardino Pr,,~ont OWner: Sam and A~reda Maleof City: Rancho Cucemunga (Aha I.oma) Zip Pr~alo Original Use: R~idanco ~d studio 9!701 D.ESCRIP~ON 7a,Archltectural Style. Contemporary 7b. Brlofly describe ~he present PHYSICAL CONDITION of the 81to or "~.ruc[ure and doscrlbe any major ~lter~tlone from Its original condl~lon: 'R'~o various buildings of this proporb/, well-Malden from view, ~'tre =itual~d in the middle or a lemon grove. AShough this properly is under one ownor~.hip, k i.~ actually t',vo separate, adiac.ent pau;~.~ls. Sam Maleof first acquired the ~aslem lot which consisted at part o[ lho lemon grove, a chicken house and a small, older residence. The lot on the west was occupied by a c. 1940 house. This wa~ laler acquired and combined wi[h the Ma]oo[ proporb/; it is nov/ occupied by lho Me[oafs' son. This residence is a one-story house wkh a medium hipped roof and-a stucco k has boon extensively remodeled over the year2. (SEE CONTINUA"FION SHELf' I) Exdrnal~d: ( ) Factual: (1952-pr~enl) 9. Archll.cl: ~m 10, B ulld~r: 11. Approx. prop~rty Fron~g~: 440' D~p~h:[22' 12. D~I~) o[ enclosed photograph(s),. ~b~,~/ ~7, 19~ 13.Condition: Excelion: (x) Good { ) Fair ( 1-1.Al:erstlone: Continuous expansion o! house 15.Surroundings: (Chock more th~n one it nec,~ary) Densely built-up ( ) Residential (x) IndusIda/( ) 18.Thraat~ to ella: None known ( ) Rrivale Dow~lopmon! ( Publb Works Project ( x ) _ 17.1s £ho a:ructure: On its original 2it~? ( x ) Moved? ( ) Deteriomled ( ) Open I~nd ( ) Scntler~d buildings Commercial (') Other: Citrus grove ) Zoning( ) Vandalism( ) } Unknown? ( ) Guest house, garage. slorago .~hed..lemon grove, =ddilionaJ residunc.8 ( ) SIGNIFICANCE 1g. Brlelly state historical and/or architectural }roperlance (Including dates, even,.~, and persons associated with the thio): This properly Is etig~la for. inclusion in th8 National Regislot of Hisloric Places under Criteria B and C. While it is less than 50 years of ~ge. it has exceptional impedance under Criterion FJ based upon its a~ociafion with a living artistic figure at international prominence, and the lewl at rocognition and professional study afforded Io his work, and under Criterion C based upon the exceptional architectural merit of the house and studio independent of its association with ils owner/builder. 3'he property is the home &nd studio of the internationally- acclaimed woodworker and furniture designer, Sam Maleof, and his wife Alfreda Ward Maleof, a former Santa Fe museum ,'znd crafts program director. Sam Maloo~ began making his furniture at h~s AI1~ Lama workshop In the 1950s. His week can been seen in a number of Amoriban museums, and has been featured In numerous television and film productions, as wall as popular and scholarly wo~ks on American furniture and crafts. His homo/studb has been ~t pilgrimage site for local colleges and universities, and the Gzzmblo House Associates o~ PasadL, na conducl an annual tour to tim property. (SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS 1-4) 20.Main theme o[ the hi.eric resource: (If more than one checked, number In order of Importance.) Architecture ( ) Arts & Leisure (x) - Economic/Industrial ( } Exploration'Settlement Government ( ) Military ( ) Railglen ( ) Sociai/1Educalion ( ) ( ) 21.Sources (List books, documenls, surveys, person81 interviews and their dates.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET 5. Localion ~kel~'-h map (draw & label site and surround;rig sb'eots, roads, e..nd prominent landmad.4}: 22.Date form prepared: Feb. 17, 19Rg, rev. July 8, 1990 By; Bonnie W. P~rks, .Aaron A. Gallup Organization: Cal~rans Address: 1120 N Street City: Sacramento Zip Coda: 95814 Phone: (916) 920-7683 or 920-7672 COHTINUATION SHEET 1 MAP REFERENCE I',[o, 32 (Sup'plamenl) ' 7b.i~rlefly d~scrlbe the pre~ont PHYSICAL CONDITION of the site or =truc:ur0 and desurJbe any major altarorient from Jt:~ original condition: (CONTINUED) Maleof sintrod building on the eastern parcel in 1952 with the constru¢Ibn or his woodworking shop. The present house, attached to the walkshop, was begun in 1956. The home sh.3 within a 5 acre lemon grove--one of the last the area. The.original small residence was lorn down about 30 years ago and replaced by the qructuro which is now called 'lho guos£ hou~e", This flal-roofod r.[ructure, r,~miniacent of ~esidences of the la~e phase of the International Slyle, sils in lhe shade of ama. ssI,Le avocado tree and has an encircling, covered deck on all four ~ides; the main entrance Is on the east. Dlroclly east acros.~ the driveway is 1he garage, a one-car facility with unpainted radical axleriot board siding. The driwway terminata~ at a small parking area north of the workshop. The-oric~in~l house, begun as a Jew rooms. forms :h0 cora c[ the pret;enl building, ~'¢h~ch has grown incrementally over the yee, rs, creating an interpla, y of varying holghls, exposures and partially 0nclosed courtyards. Interior rcom~ ar:e ellen galJory-l~e, with soaring spaces and indirect natural light provid;ng a perfect display for lhe owners' ox-ton~,iw colloclion o~ a~t and crafts. Each addition was ,.'lesioned and constructed by Sam Mak)oi. Each has boon carefully integraled inlo the overall building, and display the bul]der's treatment of ~rchkecturo as a fine art, w~h an obvious love for working in the wood medium of construction. Many rooms tn the rambling collection of unique and wonderful .~pac~s feelure hand finished lumber with handcrafted dewclod, mollise and tenon connections-troWed more like furnllure than buildi~ parts. The pdma,.'y door~ el the hou.'m are uniquely designed and have handcrafted wooden hinges, ha~ps, and latches, The original house and studb form a. one-story, L- shard unk at ',he southwest corner of the plan. Smzll addSions ex~nd tlle3e spa~ to the west and noah, while a major two- =l~ry s~don on tim oa~t soNes as a living more with ~ ~ntral a~rium enabled on the upper leve~ by z ~ny. ~ls is ~ b~audiuJly cr~ed ~p~e ~th ~rchlt~iur~l~ and In terms of it~'fini2hing details. ~e b~ny o~ns into olhar up~r level morns, including a "~n[erence more' addition above 1he original house, ~d a small libraw ~l~ve wilh a view over l~e lemon grove. A 1brae =toW lower admits light into the lower level on [he oas~ ~ the alignment of the plan sh~ts from east-west to nodh-south. This leads into a one-=toW ~db~ ~n~ainlng 1he m~ln b~om, fol~ow~ by a ~o ~1oW sealion w~h bf[ roach~ by a m~n/[i~nt Itan~raft~ c[r~l~ sl~ay. A ~,~rk of ~l, lhe stai~ay was ~nstru~od of wood from Taiwanese major.at emte~ laminat~ [ogotheq e~ch stop wau ~od and '...the join[s are ~ulplad so tha~ the s~ops ta~r from the center ~sl like pol~s on a fbwer (Stone 1986:76)." ~e rafting we= made from six laminates a~ assembled using one hunted cl~mp=. From this r~m, several ~teps lead up to lho nodh, ~nne~i~ w~h ~ wa~- ~d glass-s~ed sh0~ br~go-I~e pa~ge whbh then =lep~ down to the guest bedroom. The overall design o~ses a ~u~yard a[ the center, wi~ a p~ial ~urt on the south. A deck and a~r are s~ss~ on the west from the ~tchon. A ~maJl s~rago ~ilding atand~ ~ the 6o~hwost ~rnor of the ~mplox. 19.Briofly elate historical f~l'ldJor ~rchltocturaJ Importance (Include dales, events, ~nd persons associated whh the ait~): (CONTINUED) .Crilerlon B - The Man and His Wo.[k To say Sam Me[oaf i~ a wcodworker is like saying Michelangelo was a r, tnnecarver, yet that Is how he identifies ,himself in the title of his book and in hi~ professional life. Barn in Chine in 1916, of L~baneso pa~onls who came Io '~h~ Unlled ..States In 1900, he grow up In Southern Callfornir~. lie and Alfred~ have me, do their homn far over 35 year6 nt the 9553 Highland Avenue .~ddross in the Alia Lomas. portion of Rcmcho Cucamonga. The 'woodwork" Sam Maleof creates is l'ine'furnituro; "mastercraftsman' is th~ term others use to describe him. His exquisite designs tealure sculptural modem lines. A hallmark of hi~ work, and dm innovation for which he is famous, is exposed joiner'/. The rabbetod, dovetail, hip, and box joinls, the pe,'-j~, and the splines are all visible and considered part of the design. [n the I~roductJon to MaJoof's book, Jonathan Fairbanks, curator at ~he Boston Museum of Fine Arts. says, 'Perhaps the hallmark of Mabof furniture Is ~ half-lap JOlnL exposed where the legs meet the seat. This is ~z complex tongue and groove joint, which follow3 the contour of the chair surface. Structurally sound and visually appealing, this joint artfully provides detail at the point el transition (Maleof 19&3:19).' The [urniture is made primarily of walnut and is never 3lained. All pieces are finished by hand-rubbing with numerous co;z[s of a combination of linseed and lung oils and beeswax. CON%INU~'IION SHEET 2 MAP REFERENCE No. 32 (Supplement) In his book Areeden Furniture. 162,0 t.q the Pre:~ont. Jonmhan Fairbrinks includes Sam Malool in an elite group of three artist-craftsmen in wood furniture (the others being George N&k~l'~ima and Artht:r C~rponter) who ,make up lhe first generation Io follow Wh;zrton Esharick (1887-1970)--lha ~enior !igura in the new cra~, movement which took place after World War II. Of thi~ movement, Fairbanks says that these three "(opre-..orJt the reJntegration ot craft, ad and personal communication wfth the consumer (Fairbanks 1981:496). Michael A. Stone, in his book ¢onlemDorarv &modc.~J]._W~d_'¢,'.orkers (19B6), narrowed a list of over 10Ocraftsman to ten whic. h included Sam Maleof. His choices ~tre all ,'~sociated wilh lhe above-mentignod post-World War II craft resurgence, a period which, he says, 'saw an explosion of new styles ~,nd methods."-Ot Ibis group, Stone says. 'The eider craJtsmen [Me. leer being one] are particularly important because they took risks and built a mmket lot filejr work when support for the independent designer-crafl.~mm~ wa~ [virtually absent] (~;~tone 1986:Prela~.-e).- Of M:dcof. Siena writes that he "...typifio~ the Iirs! generated-of postwar craftsmen who were sell-taught, tiercely ladeperidom and forced to create their own market at a time when har~dmada furniture w,",s nearly unknown (Stone 1986:69)." Describing M~loof, Fairbanks also .speaks ot his "...nineworthy contribulions to the recent craft movement 8r.,d to the 'Callforni~ so. hoer el modern wQ. odwor'k. lrlg, known for ils orga. nlc shepan and sculpted Jolnl~s. San'rs work has Influenced so many craftsmen fi'lat one is tempted to pl~ce him at the head of a '~chool' (Malo,~[ 1983:19).~ His chairs, tables, and case pieces furnish lhr~ board rooms of several ve,"/i~rge corporations. Besides those of his own homo, he h~s also designed and crafled the interiors and [urnislfings for sevor~ churches which led lo his participation in the 'Exhlbillon of Liturgical Aris" al tile 4tat Intomatiom, d Eurmrist Congress, in Phil;zdelphia, in 1976. His work is also housed in the colleclions of approximately ten museums Including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the American Craft Museum. in New York City; 1he Boston Museum o[ F~ne Ads, which owns fourteen pieces; the Los Angeles County Museum and the Craft and Folk Art'Museum in Los Angeles; and the Philadelphia Museum of Art. His furniture is also In the White House and In the Vice President's House'in Washington, D.C. He has parlicipated In over flf'b' exhibits since 1970. Some of these Include -Objects U.S. A." at the Smithsonion Institute; "Woodenworks' in the FJenwick Gallery of lhe Smithsonl~n; "In Praise of Hands' an international exhibition of crafts by the World Craft Council in Toronto; 'A Renais:~ance In Furniture as Art: Master Woodworkers' at the Esther Saks Gallery, in Chicago; "Craft Today: Poetry of the Phystc:~l" at the American Craft Museum, in New York City; and 'Masters: A Tribute to Sam MaleoF at La Jolla Gallery Eight, in La Jolla. Califoraim In 1978. he participated In a exhibit and seminar at 1he Varicose, In Rome. A more complete list cl shows and oxhibks is mlachod lo this form. Sam M~loof has been ~ha .~ubjecl uf several televL~lon programs, the first being "NBC On The Go" wllh Jack .Linkletter in 1959, lhe latent being "America," a feattire for Gorman Talerisle. n, In 1986. In addition to his own book, I~Ublislled in 1983. and prnsenlly going Inlo-a second prlnlirlg, h~ and his work have been have boon featured in 25 publJcalions. Two of the moro scholarly and nc~eworttr), el those are: American D,~*cgj'j:div~ AM~: 360 Years o.( ¢roati¥,) DoslaB by Robert Bishop and P~.,tricla Coblenlz~ and American Furniture: 1620 to lhe Present by Jonathan Fairbanks. Robed Bishop Is one of the loremost authors on the de~rat~a ari~ in Areedco. ~nalhan Fai~an~. idendfi~ a~ve, al~ wrole the preyedsly cited Introdu~bn for Malcors ~a~ Mabel a~ hi, wo~ have al~ been feaIu~od in over sevon~ a~Icles in over 28 d~Ioren[ magiiaea or journals includi~ American Craft. 1981 and 1987: Craft Horizons. 1954, 1964. 1968, 1970, and 1971; Crealive Cmfl~. 1980 and 1961; Fine Woodwo~ing. 1980: and Pacific W~(~orko[. 19~2 and 1986. A more ~mpiot~ list of films and pubicorions is a~ched. ,Sam Me. Igor was lhe first recipient of the Louis Comfort T'~fktny Granl for !he Crzltsma. n Apprentice Program, in ~1969, which-al[o',vod him to take on an apprentice. He I~ also one o1' Ih~ tow to receive a ,John D. and Catherine T. 'MacArthur Foundation Fellowship (1985). Among his numorou~ other awards ~ro the American Craft Council Gold Modal (1988) and a. National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship Gram (1984). He is a Fellow of the American Crafts Council He wa~ declared a Living Treasure of Rancho Cucamonga by the City Council in 1984, aJ~d wa,~ featured in the 'Living Treasures of California" exhibition al the Crocker Art Museum in Sagamonte in 1985. {A more complete list of awards and honors is rotached.) At an aucllon for the Amoric.zn Craft Museum In 1983, one of Matoot's chair~ brought $8000. Through his work, Sam Matoct ha'~ become a personal lriend of Jimmy Carter and Joan Mendale. among ma. ny others. The MalcoIs have visi't~d the Coders in.Plains. Georgia. where 1hey house 1he several pieces of his furniture that they own. CONll,~'UATION SHEET 3 MAP REFERENCE No. 32 (Supplement) Sam and A~fmda Maloot's own home is tilled with ~ ¢n~gn~icen~ p0;son~l collo~ion wh~h Sam Maleof says ~nsists "mostly p~ocos o~ follow craftsmen I know." In ~ddldon to lh~e m~ern piacos-or~inal paintings, ~u[pturo, and a large qu:~n{~y o~ ~tlo~--tha ~rlecll~n includes museum quality ~m~ivn M~xlcan and South American talk a~. Pro-Columbian a~, San Ildefonso ~W, other Indian (mostly Naval) rugs a~d ~e~, and oriental ca~ets. The love of American Southwest ar~ and cralts is a s~clal Inler~st =herod by Alfredo W,~rd Maleof, ~ho se~ 2s the d[ro~or of the.traits prugr~m and museum at the Sant~ Fo Indian School in the late ~930s. In keeping witIt his philosophy o[ sharing his talent with others, Sam Maloo[ h:,s given over 100 lociufos; opened his home arid workshop to 50 home tours; and fought classes at fiw different instkutions; And conducted a, ppr0xim;ztely 50 workshops, from Alaska to Maine, from New Mexico to Florida. In 1959, serving as a consultant to the Stele Department on ~ proled !o...onco~lrage craft induslries in developing nations, I~e Iravoled to Iron and Lebanon. At .~ craP. s ar~ religion seminar at the Vatican Museum In Rome, mentloq-..,d above, Maleof spoke of what he lerms' a Iri-union boNzeon Ihe objecl maker, tile material'with which he works. al~d lhe person for whom he Is working. Beyond that, paraphrasing himr, o[l in a later interview, he said, "...I loci il transcends into something grealer .... God. the master craftsman who croalos all things, uses our hands as t~is instruments to make lhesa beautiful objo~ (Diamonstein 1983:144)." Maloof's por.~onal philosophy is reflected in his cra,;t. He says: I hope that my happiness with what I do Is reflected in my furniture. Furnlturo. any furnilure, lolls a story of the person who made II. 1 do not try consciously to moji6 my pieces reflect their maker, but I hope Ihat my l'umituro i~ an outgoing part of my personaJify and my way of thinking. I hope that it is ribtoni, alive, and friendly to tl~e people who use iL...I repeat over and over th;~ I want my chairs to invite a person to sit. I wahl my chairs to embra,'t-e tha~ person, to give camfad (Mafoof 1983:200). Although he is sfil[ living and still producing, the foregoing discussion clo;:u'ly illustrates that Sam Maleof, his career and his body of work have achieved a recognition and have boon tt~o .t;ubjoct of *.scholarly end popular study sufficient to give it historical perspective r~quired for [he e~;c..ption tu the rule reg:.-trding proportie,~ associated with living persons, His present designs are largely outgrowths of, or slight Improvemar'do on. oarliar proto~pos. ~t$ he continues to produce designs originated over the last lhirty years. Fairbanks states. "This consistency of vision is unusual for a designer or a craflsman in the twenfielh contrary, I! reproseres a traditional approach'to design that is ~:o[ dependant on fashionable style lrend~ (F~i~b~nk~ 19~31:519)." Robert Bishop (cited above) says of the man and his work, "The purity of MalooFs design and the great skill hu demon2tra~es In their ox~_-atlon have earned him a deserved ropulation as one ol the loading Anterlcan croatam of fine handcrafted home furnishings (Bhhop and Coblontz 1982:374). Criterion 0 - The Home and Studio Sam Maloof's workshop and house are both the produels of necessity which evolved over time. The house.is ago a product of ii~ builder's creativity, his love of his cratt and its raw material--wood. 'Uko tho homes built by his conlemporarios Esherick and CArpeeler. every detail is crafted to reflect Msloof's sense o[ design and passion for wood (Stone 198G:76).' OI his home MaJool say~: I am not an a,rchked, I codainly would not call myself a house designer, but the house does not look like ;z patched-up fob, It doas"not h~ve a fronll back, or sides because I h~tvo ~lw.--tys felt .:a house ~hould be a monolith; it ':houtd look handsome r~g~rdloss of the anglo Item which you approach it. Somelimes we have people walking around frying to find the front door. I do not use drawings when I am adding onto the house, I ju,:.t hold up a two:by-four ~d ~hlnk, looks pretty good,' and then n~il it up. I do il all by eye (Maleel 1983:195). I do not have the fin'~e ~o build the house the way I buiM a piece of furniture. I do fantasize about buildir~ a small, perlet'1 house where rdl the woodwork Js beaulifully shaped. I have managed to add ~ittle 1ouchos to our house, [or instanc.~, by purling wooden hinges and latches on every door, each one ditteren~ (Maleel 1983:196). _ My environment ls a Wonde,dul o~, but again, it is some~hir',g that wa.s created by hand (Maleof 1983:200). C'DNT~NUATION SHEET 4 MAP REFERENCE No. 32 (Supplemonl) 'The home ~nd sIudio, described in section 7b, exhibit an exceptional level of craftsmanship and design. Hand built homos became part of the paperer culture of ~he 19605 and 1970s a.q pad of the bc, ck-to-tl~o-oarth counterculture movement Many homos of th[~ movement are dOCumented in two works by Art Boericko--j:j.~n~fg.~, Ha.,z~.e. rd..A..G.~ld.e..1o Iho Woodbutch~r's Art 1973 ~d J-tond.~,~de_FJp_jzl. es_; The Natural Way to .B_uiJd, 1981. Those books llJustrate numerous such structures and -.how them to 5o charming. imaginative, and possessing great ingenuity. Salvaged And natural materials contribute 10 these qualities. None however, possess the level of sophistication and craftsman-shi~ exhibited in Sam Ms[oaf's home. Further, Ma~of began his house in 1956, well before the movement, end during a period when the machine ethic dominated the construction induslr,/, and )mndcraJ'led houoos were o. rarity, While ho~uilt it himself p~rtly ~or economic reasons, he also did so b~causo of his love for wood as = material and bg, c. alJ~e of his OWn aoSfi'mlic senr..A. HiS house ix an extension of himsoil and of his work. The difference between Maloof's homo and those illustralod i~l Bouricko's book is the difference behv6en2jeAius and ingenuity, and between aesthetics and cbleness. The details In the house are exquisite and finished appropdntoly 1o their purpose. While many of the beams ~nd rafters are sawn lumber. In some rooms, such as the two-stc~.ry living room, these members fenlure hand shaping and finishing. As Maleat does not like metal and exposes none in his [urnilu;o, he ha.s aXlehOed this proloronca to the construction of the house whore many of 1he connections are mardee and tenon with lho joinon/exposed as in his furniture. All the primary doors have wooden hinges, hasps, and latct~os; all are differon! and designed for the door they serve. Thus, while the house and the craftsman are inextricably linked, the house, wi~h the cratlsmanship of its construction end de~ails, especially at the limo of its initial construction, stands as a structure of unusually high artistic merit to lend it exceptional importance as a property that has achi~w~,d significance within the last fifty years. [[ is exceptional In the suburban areas east of !.as Angeles where tract hou.~ing has been the norm since Ihe 1950s. ~,~.mmary. This property moots Criteria B and C el the National Register of Historic Places as a Ioss-than-lihy-year-old property associnted wilh ~ living person, As Snm Maleof has produced the m,',Jo body of his work (with the exception of his earliest pieces, constructed tn the gnrege of his previous residence) in this home end studio, and owns no other property. It is the only property associated with ~hls mastercraftsman during his furnlturo making career. h arubadies hLs croft and philosophy, and is the site to which those who wish to leazn, purchase, or just admire make pilgrimages. It is a strucluro unique to its b~Jildor, and tho wodd, and is of exceptional arti~lic mariL The bound.re'los of Iho proporty aro the legal boundarlos doffnod by'essessor'3 parcel nurnbor= 202-101-01 and 202-101-18, soo atladlod map. Tho sorting of [ho properly consist.,~ of tho 5..1 acros o~ stmcturos and orango groves ~c~ludod w~hln ~ho lwo parcels. ~o house ~nd slud~ are contributing structures to the uit~. ~e guest house and lho remodeled 1940s residence on lhe western pardi are non-~ntributors. CON,TINUA~ON S}-f.F.~ff' $ 21. · Sourc",~ MAP REFERENCE No. 32 (Suppl~menl) Bishop, Ftab~r'i and PntrJ. ck~ Coblontz, ._~'0..~[.~D.e~q£a. tivo Ads: ~,.~r~ Yenm t';,L.Q~lh,,e De.*.ign. Now York: H:',rry Abrams. Inc., 1982. " Bishop, Roberl Conturier~_,z~Sty~,_o.f.t5o American Chair. Now York: E.P. Dutton & Co., 1972. Boe~o, A~ and Bony Sh~piro,Handm~H0.~es: A Gu~oj~ Wo~b~chor'~ Ad. N~w York: D~/a~d. Pross, 1973, Boori~o, Art and Bany Sh~',pi~o,Hondm~do H~: ~ ~atur~y ~o Bu~ Now Yo~: Dela~o Press, 1901. OJamonstoin, BarbaraJee, ~ndrnado in Am~jcA. New Yo~k: Har~ N. Abrams, PubJishe~, 1988. Fairb~ks, Jonathan ~, Am~r[can Fu.~JturfJ I620 to th~ P~p~ont. Now York: ~ch~rd Marok Publbhe~, 1981. Mploo~, Sam, ~r~Ma[oO{, Wo~dwcrkcr. Tokyo: Kodan~ha [ntern~/anal. Ltd., 1903, Paz, Octavio and the World Cr~h CouncilJn PmJ~_.0~ H~nds: ~ol~moor~G¢_Qro. l[~ o¢ lho ~o~d. To~nto: N~w York Graphic S~iety, 1974. Stoobo, Marlh~ Gaines, The Ifflsto~ of Alta Lomo. Cali~o~J~..].~.80-19~0. A~ta Loma, 1981. Stono, Mi~aol A. ~~rA~ Am~rlca~WoodwoAers. S~It L~o City: Gi~ k{, Smhh, Inc. 1986. Info.jew, Sam Ma~ot, Alta Loma. Feb~ 17, 1989. Z.5 A C. ,2.50 AC. Maloof Froperry 9~5.~ Hiebland Ave. I ..... -q-~9 th Property Boundaries Z~Y///t3/T' SAH HAL00F RESIDENCE AND STUDIO SKETCH FLOOR PLAN SITE PLAN ~J ~'x/¢/~/T L_ c~r~-ft,'b OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION £)EPARTMENT 0¢ PARKS AND RECREATION POST OFFJCE 8Ox 9472696 S,&C'R2~M~NTO, CALI¢OR~A 94296.O~01 (S'~ 6J 445.8~6 FHTWA900209A Augus~ 27, 1990 Bruco E. Cannon, Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration P.O. Box 1915 Sacramento, CA 95812-1915 Re: Maloof property (07-LA-30-2.4/7.8; 08-SBd-30-0.0/22.8) Dear Mr-. Cannon: Thank you for requesting our comments on a supplement to the Historic Property Survey Report for construction of State Route 30 on new alignment from La Verne to San Bernardino. The supplement is a teevaluation of the Sam and Allreda Maloof residence and studio at 9553 Highland Avenue J.n Rancho Cucamonga. sed on this information, we concur in your determination that he Maloof property is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places at the local level o · B and C. Although as ~ ,.~ f.~i~niflcance under c period of si~n~~°~~ w~un a living ~erson =~ ..:~C ~s construction {~ ~ .... =-Z~.~ only ~o the be~inn~ ~" ~-, She Xa±oof property gualif~e~ of exceptional significance. It is t with master craftsman ~ u~ ..... he ~Qly property ass c and it is a ,~,4~.~ ,...,UJT '~uu~ Qurln~ ~is woo~ .... ~-, o iated ~ uwu~lng career/ · .~= ~uxl~ng, of exceptional artistic merit. Boundaries are the lot lihes. This building is the only contributor, and two other buildings are noncontributors. Thank you for the opportunity to review your teevaluation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call staff historian Doterie Clement at (916) 322-9600 Sihcerely, Kathryn Gualtieri~ State H~storic Preservation Officer fHWA-Sacramenm A I ADA HEC ROW OIS~ A B C D ,. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part ! - Initial Study) The purpose of t-his fo.-m is to-inform t-he City of t-he basic components of t. he proposed project so that the City ,may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; ~he California Environmental Quality ACT;~ a_nd_the City's Rules and Procedures to Implemen~ C?QA. It is important that the infor=na-~ion requested in this application be provided in full; INCOML~LA~TE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROC~-SSED. Please note that it is the res. ponsibi!ity of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of subn~itta!; City staff will not b~ available to perform work required to prov.~_d.e m/ssing inforuu~tlon. Application N,~her for ~he projec~_ to which this form petra/ns: .............. Project Title: Maloof Relocation/New Residence Name & Address of project owner(s): San Bernardino Associated Governments 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92401 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: San Bernardino Associated Governments, 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino~ CA 92401 C~ntact Person & Address: Gary W. Moon, Director of Program Management, San Bernardino Associated Governments, 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92401 Telephone N-~her: (909) 889-8611 x153 Name & Address of person preparing ~his form (if different from aJ~ove): Tom Casabonne, Environmental Specialist, San Bernardino Associated Governments, 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92401 Te3..ephone N,~er: C ! T Y o (909) 889-8611 :<142 f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION Information ind/cated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CIIP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 X 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes ~he project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photo?r_aphs which show representative views into t-he site from ~he north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pr~m~_~y access points which serve ~ne site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each_photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): SE corner of Almond Street and Carnelian Avenue, North of. Ridden Farm Road and West of Sunstone. 4) Assessor's Parcel N-m~ers (attach add/tiona! sheet if necessary): Assessment No. 1061-281-16 ~5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 6.6 Acres Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed declications): 5.0 Acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan a~endment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach add/tiona! sheet if necessary): No zone change required. Project aoDlicant is seekin~ Conditional Use Permit to allow reiDcation of the historic Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence & studio to be used as an arts & crafts center/ shop, with the shop continuinz to operate as a small-scale woodworking/ furniture business. 9) Include a description of all pe_-m..i~s which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmen,a! agencies in order to fully implement the project: Conditional Use Permit, Hillside DeVelopment (less than or equal to 4 dwellin~ units), Landmark Alteration Permit, Landmark Designation, - ~1I applicable ~radin~ and buildin~ Dermits. Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project inc!ucling information on ~opogr_aphy, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. -~e~cribe any existing sr-ructures on site (including age and condition) and the use of ~ne structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., g~ologica! and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeologica! surveys, traffic studies): The site is planted in citrus (tangerine. navel orange. valencia oranze) ~nterspersed w~th a ]~m~ted number of various s~ze oaks~ The site has The site has a natural watercourse located on the east side and has eucalvDtus rows on the north and east Drooertv lines. The site ~enerally slopes ±8% from north to south. It is surrounded on four sides-by existin~ streets. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of ~he site. Site all sources of information {books, published reports and oral history): Proposed site has no known cultural and/or historical aspects. 11) Describe any noise so%lrces .and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Proposed J~'e is not affected by any known noise sources. 12) Describe ~he proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of ~he site in te_~ms of ult~te use which will result from ~he proposed project. Ind/cate if there are proposed phases for deve!o.mment, the exigent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessa.~y: Please see attached "Proiect Description: Maloof Relocation". Describe ~he surrounding properties, inc!ucling information on plan~s and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fam/!y, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Surroundinl neighborhoods consist of single family residences to the eas%, west, and north. An open, vacant tract lies soQth of the property, with sinRle family residences beyond that. 14) Will the proposed project change ~he pattern, scale or character of the surrounding g~neral area of ~he project? The proposed project will not chan~e the low-densitv residential ~bmrmcter of the neighborhood. 15) Indicate the tlrpe of short-te_~m ~nd long-term noise to be g~nerated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affec-~ adjacent prope---ties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Minimal noise will be generated durin~ construction of the new residence and relocation/reolication of the original Maloof house. Little or no long-term noise will be generated. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or .replacements of m~ture or scenic trees: ' Some citrus trees are in decay and will be replanted. Some citrus/mature ~trees will be removed due to new grading. New trees will be replanted or relocated to simulate the current Maloof house grounds. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None. 18) ' Ind/cate expected amount of water usage. (See Attacb~nent A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Wat~r_.District at 987-2591. ao Residential (gal/day) 6700 Commercial/Ind. (qal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/day) 12.&00 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ~ Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach ~ercolation tests. If d/scharg~ to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expec-~ed daily sewag~ g~neration: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For fudrther clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. R~sidential (gal/day) b. Industrial/Commercial (ga!/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) N,~her of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Two detached residences will be located on this parcel of 5 acres. =Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 22) AaTticipated ranqe of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ N/A Rent (per month) $ N/A to $ Specify nurd~er of bedrooms by unit type: One new residence with two b~d~ooms. One relocated historic residence to be used as an arts and crafts center, with no bedrooms. 23) Ind/cate anticipated household size by unit type: will house two oeoole. The new residence 24) Indicate ~he expected nu~her of school children who will be resid/ng within ~he projec-~: Contact ~he appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: 0 c. Senior High: 0 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or inst/tutiona! uses: N/A 26) Total floor area of co~ercial', industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) 29) · Number of employees: ToTal: N/A Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, includ/ng wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classifica~6n (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the n~er of workers to be hired that currently reside in t-he City: '31) For co~rcial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution ~m~ssions. (Data should be v~rified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ~r~. P~M~JECTS 32} ~ave the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to dete_~ine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. The proposed project has been approved by water, fire, and flood control agencies. A septic tank system will be used for sewage disposal. In the .known history of this prope_-t.y, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB ' s; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storaqe of any of t-he above. Please-list ~he materials 'and describe t-heir use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. - No-known use, store§e, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials has occurred on the site. 34) Will the proposed project involve the tempo_ rary or long-term use, storage or clischarg~ of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not ]~ m~ ted to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The locat/on of such uses, along with t.he storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. All chemicals associated with woodworkin§ (varnish, linseed oil, etc.) will be stored, used, and disposed of in full compliance with local, state, and federal ordinances. I h~reby certify t-hat the statements fu_~nished above and in the attached exhibits present ~he data and information r _equ/red for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and info.-mar_ion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand ~hat additional informat/on may be requlired to be submitted before an adequate evalu~ticn can be made by the City of Rancho Oacamon~a. Title: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MALOOF RELOCATION The Sam and Allreda Maloof Residence and Studio (located at 9553 Highland Avenue) have been determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The site is adjacen_t to a the proposed State Route 30 project. After studying many alternatives to mitigate the impact of the proposed State Route 30 project, relocation of the significant elements of the historic site to new site was selected as the preferred alternative. This.application is for approval of the relocation/re-creation of the Maloof Residence, Shop structures and site elements to a new site bounded by Almond Street, Carnelian Street, Hidden Farm Road and Sunstone Avenue. The application seeks approval for the historic residence and shop to be used as a, woodworking facility and non-profit Arts and Crafts Center. In addition to relocating the historic residence to the new site, a new +2,500 s.f. residence and garage will be constructed as the home of Sam and Alfreda Maloof. After the site is completed a conservation easement will be recorded to protect the site and the project will be nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. The Maloof Residence is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places for its architectural, artistic, cultural and historical significance because it is the only property associated with the artist during his career. "It embodies his craft and philosophy, and is the site to which those who wish to learn, p.urchase, or just admire make pilgrimages. It is a structure unique to its builder, and the world, and is of exceptional artistic merit."~ Th~ proposed project is a practical solution to protecting and preserving this important property while being a good neighbor to the surrounding properties. The attached Project Explanation further describes the Existing Maloof Site (pages 1-2), The State Route 30 Project's Impact and Mitigation (pages 2-5) and The Proposed New Site Plan (pages 5-8). 1 California Department of Transportation Architectural Inventory/Evaluation Form, Sam and AlEreda Maloof Residence and Studio, #19 Significance, February 17, 1989, rev. July 6, 1990. Project Description for the Maloof Relocation Project Page l PROJECT EXPLANATION: MALOOF REI~OCATION I. Existing Location The Maloof Residence and Studio evolved as a physical representation of the life and craftsmanship of the Maloofs. The house and studio have grown with new rooms or buildings as need demanded while always respecting the existing landscape_elements. The site itself evolved into a myriad of mature trees, plants, walks, stepping stones, retaining walls, pottery and sculptures. The 'Maloof Residence and Studio were determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on a Caltrans Architectural Inventory Evaluation Form dated Feb. 6, 1989, revised July 8, 1990. The State Office of Historic Preservation concurred with this determination in a letter dated August 27, 1990. Character of the Site The residence is located on about 5.1 acres of land where the structures are nestled in a lemon grove. The site has over 200 different species of plants -- grown by Sam and Alfreda, often from just a volunteer. The site also has a number of man made elements such as driveways, steps, walls and wood decks constructed by Sam Maloof. These include concrete retaining walls with rock insets, cobble walls at the entry drive and wood decking at the guest house entry. The third component of the site is the myriad of character elements which include sculptures, bird houses, wooden planters and pottery. These elements were collect by the Maloofs or crafted by Sam Maloof. The Residence Exterior The residence itself grew out of what was to be only a work studio. The residence is a rambling series of rooms each with its own character, while unified by the craftsmanship of Sam Maloof. Each room was designed and constructed by Sam Maloof. The exterior of the residence is often quite simple in its general cladding, utilizing board on board or board and construction. However, hints of Sam Maloof's artistry are evident at the doors, windows, posts and arbors, all of which display the hand-crafted detailing. While the interiors of the residence dominate the design, there was obviously care given to the exterior through the planning of courtyards and interplay with existing trees. As each room was added, the exterior was carefully designed to be integrated into the overall residence, not by mimicking the previously constructed rooms but by complementing them. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 1 The Residence Interior - The interiors of the rooms are a lively mix of varying materials, volumes of space and indirect natural lighting. While the eye is naturally drawn to the built- in crafted details, furnishings and collection of art, the backdrop of architectural elements is of simple materials and textures. The floors, walls and ceilings of the rooms are comprised of many materials: floors of concrete, carpet, wood, brick, and tile; svalls of exposed wood studs, gypsum board, plaster, cork, wood siding and tile; and ceilings of wood, acoustical tile and plaster. However, the detailing of exposed beams, posts, doors, windows, and wood trim is magnificent. These feat~fres are hand freished and crafted with doweled or mortis and tenon connections. The doors and windows of the house, including the head, jambs, and sills are all crafted by Sam Maloof, with wooden hinges, hasps and latches. These elements are obviously beautiful built-in pieces of hand-crafted furniture. The hierarchy of personal property in the house starts with Sam Maloof's furniture, whether it be chairs, tables or perhaps a music stand. However, it is very evident that the Maloof's have chosen to display their magnificent collection of art in each room. The modern pieces are often from craftsman/mists the Maloof's know personally and include sculpture, paintings and pottery. "The collection also includes museum quality primitive and South American folk art, Pre-Colombian art, San Ildefonso pottery, other Indian (mostly Navajo) rugs and pottery, and oriental carpets. The love of American Southwest art and crafts is a special interest shared by Alfreda Ward Maloof, who served as the director of the crafts program and museum at the Santa Fe Indian School in the late 1930's."~ II.:The State Route 30 Project Impact and Mitigation The Maloof Residence and Studio is located immediately adjacent to the proposed State Route 30 project. The proposed project is the construction of the State Route 30, from Foothill Boulevard in the city of La Verne, Los Angeles County (07-LA-30-2.4/7.8), to 1215, in the city of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County (08-SBd-30-0.0/22.8), 'a total of 45.4 kilometers (28.2 miles). The corridor traverses the cities of La Verne and Claremont, in Los Angeles County, arid the .cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Rialto, and San Bernardino, in San Bernardino County. The Route 30 corridor has been designated as part of California's freeway and expressway system for more than 40 years. The concept of a freeway with the corridor was first adopted by the state in the early 1950s. Land use planning de- I California Department of Transporttion Architectural Inventory/Evaluation Form, Sam and Alfreda Maloof Residence and Stud/o, #19 Significance, February 17, 1989, rev. July 6, 1990. Project E~qglanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 2 cisions made by the local jurisdictions along the corridor were conditioned by the expectation that the programmed facility would ultimately be constructed within the designated right-of-way. In most of the affected communities, development was not permitted to encroach on the right-of-way. The freeway will consist of three genfiral purpose lanes and one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction2. The designers of the Route 30 project have a number_of major issues to consider when evaluating altemativ~es. In addition to evaluating the impact on historical sites the project must be designed to protect public safety by meeting (or exceeding) proven design criteria. The freeway must meet'local auto circulation needs by providing ingress and egress at appropriate locations. Lastly, both the land acquisition and the actual construction need to be approached in a cost effective manner During the course of considering the Route 30 alignment adjacent to the Maloof property, all the items above were considered. Twenty-five (25) alternatives3 were analyzed under the following broad headings: · Avoidance either inside or outside of the right-of-way --Realigrunent of freeway · Tunnel/cut and cover · Elimination and/or alteration of interchange ramps · Relocation of historic elements on the existing site · Relocation of historic elements off site (to a new site) Evaluation of the Relocation Alternatives The process of evaluating the historic significance of the Maloof property and the impact of the proposed Route 30 started in early 1989 when the initial Historical Architectural Survey was conducted. Contact between the Maloof's attorneys with representatives of Caltrans and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), began June 15, 1990. Numerous additional meetings occurred, and in January of 1991 a gathering held at the Maloof property evolved into an advisory committee which has worked toward a solution of the issues.4 The advisory committee continued to work towards a resolution and in early mid- June, t992 hired a consultant team (Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., Kariotis and Associates and The Dike Parmership) to prepare a relocation study to analyze the 2 Draft State Route 30 Section 106 Documentation Finding of Effect and Memorandum of Agreement, March 1994, Page 2. 3 For a complete description of the alternative see MExhibit G.6" in Draft State Route 30 Section ]06 Documentation Finding of Effect and Memorandum of Agreement, March 1994. 4. For a complete description of the process see "Exhibit H Maloof Property Chronology" in Draft State Route 30 Section 106 Documentation Finding of Effect and Memorandum of Agreement, March 1994. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 3 feasibility of relocating the historic elements of the Existing Property (buildings and site elements) to a new site The consultant team met with the advisory committee during the preparation of the final report and the Sam and Alfreda Maloof Residence and Studio Relocation Report was completed on March 29, 1993. The study analyzed the structure of the Maloof Residence/Studio to develop specific recommendations for the disassembly, relocation and reconstruction process. Potential relocation sites were compared to the existing site using the following evaluation factors: site topography; setback; relationship of house to trees; presence of similar landscape elements, trees, surrounding groves and micro climate; relocation route; potential disruption to business; and overall cost. An Optimal plan was developed as a visual tool to representing most of these factors as shown in Exhibit "A". The factors were used to evaluate and rank three on-site and three off-site relocation alternatives to determine the 'most acceptable alternative. The project team developed a matrix to score and evaluate each alternative. The Maloof Subcommittee met on April 12, 1993, and reached a consensus that under certain conditions relocation could be an appropriate mitigation measure, with a suitable off-site location to be determined after further study. This conclusion was further discussed at a meeting of the full Maloof Committee May 17, 1993, with Sam Maloof in attendance. Particular emphasis was placed on the methodology, conclusions, study findings and recommendations-of the Relocation Report. The Committee recommendations were written into the Findings of Adverse Effect and the Memorandum of Agreement. The final relocation site will be approved by SANBAG, Caltrans, FHWA, SHPO and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (the Council), in consultation with the Maloof Relocation Study Committee. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(a), FHWA initiates consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), in applying the criteria of effect [Section 800.9(a)] and adverse effect [Section 800.9(b)]. The Draft State Route 30 Section 106 Documqntation finding of Effect and Memorandum of Agreement, constitutes the Finding of Effect (FOE) that the Route 30 improvements project will have on historic properties following application of the criteria of effect and adverse effect. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), requires federal agencies such as FHWA to evaluate the effect on historical properties of federally licensed undertakings. Regarding FHWA's finding, the preferred alternative will have an Adverse Effect on the property. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 4 The proposed Mitigation Measures for this Adverse Effect are: Historic elements will be relocated to a new site HABS/HAER recordation of all buildings and site elements will performed prior to any disturbance of the property. 5 On May 24, 1994, the Maloofs and SANBAG entered into an agreement providing for the acquisition of the Existing Property and the preparation of a Conservation Plan and related Conservation Agreement. Shortly thereafter the site selection process commenced. Site Identification Process A historical Architect and Landscape Architect identified 21 potential sites as being candidates for the relocation. The evaluation criteria from the Sam and AIfreda MaIoof Residence and Studio Relocation Report were utilized to evaluate and rank each site. Through a series of reviews the number of candidates was reduced three. The three candidates selected by the Design Team and the Maloofs were next reviewed by the reviewing agencies -- SHPO, SANBAG and Caltrans. This was accomphshed by a joint meeting of representatives of each agency, the Design Team, and the president of the Maloof Foundation. The meeting reviewed the completed evaluation procedure and then moved to visit each site for a walk- through. The three sites were presented for comment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The consensus of the meeting was that all three sites were acceptable for the relocation. A £mal review of the three resulted in the selection of the site bounded by Almond Street, Carnelian Street, Hidden Farm Road and Sunstone Avenue. III. Description of Proposed New Site Plan Existing Conditions The proposed site is +5 acres that are planted in Citrus. The site has a natural watercourse located on the east side and has Eucalyptus rows on the north and east property lines. The site general/y slopes +8% from north to south. The site is surrounded on four sides by existing streets that are in varying compliance with City standards. The site meets the criteria of from the Sam and Alfreda Maloof 5 See "Exhibit A Memorandum of Agreement" in Draft State Route 30 Section 106 Documentation Finding of Effect and Memorandum of Agreement, March 1994. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 5 ~/~} T /~ Residence and Studio Relocation Report generally-because it is closely resembles the existing Maloof Site on Highland Avenue in size, orientation, driveway access (from north), citrus groves, Eucalyptus rows and community. Project Uses The following five uses will be integrated into the new site: 1. Continued design and woodworking workshop, with a maximum of three employees (in addition to Sam and Alfreda Maloof). 2. Original relocated residence to be utilized as an Arts and Crafts Center, with limited hours of operation. The Center will be operated by the Maloof Foundation, a non-profit corporation established for the preservation, teaching and exhibition of Arts and Crafts. The Center will be open +3 days a week, for 4 hours per day. The maximum number of guests at any one time will be 60. The Foundation will employee up to 2 people on site. 3. Guest quarters for up to two "Artists in Residence" who may stay up to 30 days at the Maloof Arts and Crafts Center. 4. A newly constructed residence for Sam and Alfreda Maloof. 5. The farming of Citrus on site. Site Plan The proposed site plan generally places the elements and structures from Highland Avenue site at the North and the new Maloof residence at the South. The two portions will be integrated into a single entity by the citrus groves, similar landscape/hardscape elements and architecture. The site will need to be graded at the northern portion of the site to accommodate the relocated structure which was designed to fit the less sloping original site on Highland Avenue. Structures The structures at the North will include the residence, shops and wood storage buildings currently located at the Highland Avenue Site. The residence itself will be relocated and workshop and storage buildings will be re-creations of the existing structures. The structures are mostly board on board clad, with metal standing seam roofs. They are generally one story, with a portion having two stories. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 6 The new residence is located at the south side of the site and will be one story with a loft at the living area. The materials will match the original structures . board on board siding and metal standing seam roof. The residence will have a two car garage of the same materials. The new house is designed with the full involvement of Sam and Aftreda Ma16of. Site Elements The northern portion will have the original characteristics of the Highland Aveflue site by the relocation or re-creation of significant historical elements, including landscape, hardscape and various site elements into the citrus grove. These elements include the original curving drive which will act as the ceremonial entrance to the site -- actual auto access for the original residence (Arts and Crafts Center) will be from Cameran. The northwestern comer will have 25 car spaces integrated into the groves for guests and employees. Two driveways to the parking and will allow buses to drop off and pick up guest to the Arts and Crafts center. The Eucalyptus rows on the North west will be maintained. The new residence will be placed in the citrus grove at the southern section of the site. Improvements will include a new driveway from Hidden Farm Road, guest parking for the residence and patios, decks and gardens for the residence. The existing watercourse at the East will remain as currently configured and the two rows of Eucalyptus at the East will remain. The entire site perimeter will be fenced and gated with metal fencing (see through). Off Site Improvements Almond Street will be improved with curb and gutter as directed by staff to continue the equestrian trail. The trail will be developed to protect the existing Eucalyptus. Carnelian Street will be improved with curb and gutter as directed by staff and will include an equestrian trail at the east side. This will necessitate the elimination of one citrus row. Hidden Farm Road will also be improved with curb and gutter as directed by staff and will include a driveway entrance to the new residence. Stonestone Avenue will be improved with curb and gutter and a fire turn around at the north end. It requested that the curb to curb at Sunstone continue to be +28 Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 Page 7 ~/~ /~ l ~/~ feet to retain the existing mature Eucalyptus row. The fire cul-de-sac will be improved to allow turning while maximizing the retention of the Eucalyptus tree s. Phasing The project will occur in two phases: Phase I will include all site grading, pad improvements for all structures, off site improvements, Eucalyptus and grove maintenance, new driveways and parking, re-creation of shop and wood storage facilities and construction of the new house. The site elements for the relocated original residence will not be developed in this phase. The Woodshop equipment and wood storage will be moved from the Highland Avenue site and woodworking will continue at the new site. The Maloofs will move into the new residence. Phase H will include the moving of original house from the Highland Avenue site to the new site. Site Elements will be moved as practicable or recreated to mimic the original Highland Avenue site. Project Explanation for the Maloof Relocation Project · 3/2/96 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1) Project File #/Name: Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Revie~v 96-03. / Maloof Relocation / New Residence 2) Relat6d Files: Landmark 96-01 3) Applicant: San Bernardino Associated Governments Address: 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92401 Telephone #: (909) 889-8611 Project Description: Relocation of historic MaloofResidence and Accessory Structures, and conversion of same to museum / arts and crafts center, and construction of a new two bedroom residence. Project Accepted as Complete (date): March 18, 1996 4) 5) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the potential rnpacts identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" answers are required. An explanation shall also be provided in each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." Yes Maybe N~o g) EARTH - Will the proposal resttit in: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in the geologic structure? ( ) ( ) ( X ) b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction or over covering of the soil? ( ) ( ) ( X ) c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? ( ) ( ) ( X ) d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( X ) e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ( ) ( ) ( X ) f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ( ) ( ) ( X ) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ( ) ( ) ( X ) ~ II. AIR - Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ( ) ( ) b) The creation of objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) c) Alteration of air movement moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ( ) ( ) (X) (X) (X) III. WATER - Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine ---or fresh v4atifs7 ( ) ( ) (X) b) Chan, g~s in the absorption rate, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runon:. ( ) ( ) c) Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? ( ) ( ) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? ( ) ( ) e) Discharge into surface waters, or in alteration of surface water quality, including, but not hmited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ( ) ( ) f') Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? ( ) ( ) g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ( ) ( ) h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) I) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal pools? ( ) ( ) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) IV. PLANT LIFE - Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? ( ) ( b) Reduction in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ( ) ( c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ( ) ( ) d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ( ) ( ) ) (X) ) (X) (X) (X) Vo ANIMAL LIFE - Will the proposal result in: a) ~han~.e in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land ~fimals, including repn'les, fish and shellfish benthic organisms or insects)? b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Introduction of any new species of animals into the area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ( ) ( ) d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ( ) ( ) (X) (X) 2 VI. NOISE - Will the proposal resttit in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? VIii. LIGHT AND GLARE - Will the proposal.' ----a) Produce new light and glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) VIII. LAND USE - Will the proposal result in.'" a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ( ) ( ) (X) IX. NATURAL RESOURCES - Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ( ) ( ) (X) Xo RISK OF UPSET - Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) POPULATION - Will the proposal.' a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? ( ) ( ) (X) XII. HOUSING - Will the proposal.' a) Affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? a) b) c) d) e) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - Will the proposal result in.' Gene~-ation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 3 ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) () () (X) f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or .p.~edestrians? ( ) ( ) ( X ) a) b) c) d) e) f) PUBLIC SERVICES - Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in, a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' Fire protection? ( ) ( ) Police protection? ( ) ( ) Schools? ( ) ( ) Parks and other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) Maivtenance of public facilities, includingroads? ( ) ( ) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) XV. ENERGY - Will the proposal result in.' a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ( ) ( ) b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? ( ) ( ) (X) (X) XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS - Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( b) Communications systems? ( ) ( c) Water? ( ) ( d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) (X) ) (X) ) (X) ) (X) ) (X) ) (X) XVII. a) b) XVIII. a) b) HUMAN HEALTH - Will the proposal result in.' Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? l~xposure of.people to potential health hazards? AESTHETICS - Will the proposal result in.' The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) () () (X) ( ) ( ) (X) XIX. RECREATION - Will the proposal result in.' 4 a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities? b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Will the proposal result in.' a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? ( X ) b) Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic "-- buildifig,~tffucture or object? ( ) c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic, cultural values? ( X ) () () ( ) (X) () () b) c) d) MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Short term' Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time. Long-term impacts well endure well into the future.) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects xvhich will cahse substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Narrative description of environmental impacts) - XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS (Examine whether the project would be consistent with existing zo.ning, plans, and other applicable land use controls) - EARLIER ANALYSES - Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR or other CEQA process, one or, mo,r,e, effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 1506.~(c)(.~)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used - Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. 5 b) c) Impacts adequately addressed - Identify which effects from the above checklist xvere within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures - For effects that are "less than si.~nificant with mitieation incomorated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated ~r refined from the ~arlier docu~ment and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. DETERMINATION - On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) -I fi~d]hat the proposed project could not have a significant effect ori the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared ....................................................................( ) b) I find tha. t although~ the pr~o, posed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigmt~cant ettect in this case because mitigation measures described on the attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared ...................................................................( X ) I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ......................................................... ( ) c) Print Name and Title April 3, 1996 Date XXVI. APPLICANT CERTIF_ICATION (To be completed by applicant) - I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature Print Name and Title Date 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Part II Environmental Evaluation and Discussion Project Description: Relocation of historic Maloof Residence and Accessory Structures, and conversion of same to museum/ads and crafts center, and construction of a new two bedroom residence. Earth: a) The site is not within any known unstable earth condition area. b) The displacement and disruptions will take place only in the areas needed accommodate parking, driveways, and structures with a majority of the site unaffected. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the project. The grading will be conducted consistent with City codes. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) Consistent with City standards and conditions of approval prior to occupancy, the site shall be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion per City standards and conditions of approval. The impact is not significant. The project will not affect any river, channel, ocean, lake, or bay. The project is not within any known seismic special study zone nor subject to any known geologic hazard. No additional studies are required. g) II. Air: a) b) c) Short term construction activities will disturb the soil. Consistent with SCAQMD (Rule 403), dust suppression techniques will be used so that fugitive dust does not remain visible beyond the property line of the project. Long term, consistent with City standards and conditions of approval, prior to occupancy the site shall be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion per City standards and Conditions of approval. The impact is not significant. The project will not create any objectionable odors. The project will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. III. Water: a) There are no marine or fresh water courses on site. A study is on file: "Preliminary Drainage Report: Maloof Relocation dated March 4, 1996." The absorption rate may be slightly altered because of the paving and ' l~ardscape proposed. Storm flows received in the vee shaped natural watercourse will not be significantly affected. Surface storm water flows will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities consistent with City codes and policies. The Developer will be required to install drainage facilities which will not increase down stream flows beyond the capacity of the existing channel. The impact is not significant. c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. d) The project will not affect the amount of surface water in any body. e) The project will not be discharging into any surface waters. f) The proposed upgrading of the existing drainage pipe under Hidden Farm Road from 24-inch diameter to 48-inch diameter RCP will assure that current flood control standards for 100 year storm incidents will be met, thereby protecting the road from ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 2 IV. go VII. IX. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project is anticipated to u§e only that amount of water consistent with dust avoidance during construction and with a storage and distribution facility upon project __ _completion. The amount of water usage is not significant. · i)The natural channel adjacent to the east property line is a special flood hazard area. No structures or grading will be allowed within the Zone A. Plant Life: a) The project will remove a portion of an abandoned citrus grove. There v~-ill be no impact on diversity of species. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Consistent with City codes and SHPO recommendations, landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with landscaping materials previously used on the existing MaloofHouse site. There will be no impact to native species. d) Remnant citrus grove exist on the site. Grove trees that are beyond reclamation will be removed and replaced wherever possible. Animal Life: a) There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. b) There are no 'known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is surrounded on all sides by public roads and single family r~sidences. The project will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. .Noise: a) The site is currently vacant. No increase in existing noise level is anticipated. b) Consistent with City codes, noise levels will not be exceeded at the property line. Light and Glare: a) New light will be created because the property is currently vacant. The impact is not significant. Land Use: a) ....No substantial land use alteration is proposed with the application. The site is identified as Very Low Density in the General Plan. "House Museum - Arts & Crafts Center" is a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Residential Zones. Therefore, the project is consistent with the present and planned land use of the area. Natural Resources: a) The project will conserve an existing citrus grove; therefore, it is expected to have a positive impact on conservation of resources. Risk of Upset: a) There will be no significant impact. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT iNITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 3 XIII. XV. XVI. b) Two means of emergency access will be maintained consistent with all applicable codes of the City and the Fire District: the primary access for the Museum will be from Carnelian Street and a secondary access on Almond Street will be maintained. The primary access for the new residence will be Hidden Farm Road. There will be no significant impact. Population: a) The maximum number of employees will be five. The project will have no impact on the population of the City. Housing: a) The maximum number of employees will be five. The project will not create the need for additional housing. Transportation: a) The project will generate construction hips. This is not a significant impact. When fully operational the project will generate a maximum average daily trips of 62 trips per day. This is below the threshold of significance. b) The site is sufficient in size to provide the parking spaces required by the City code. c) Street and community trail improvements will be made in conformance with City regulations and there will be no significant impacts. d) The project is consistent with existing circulation patterns. e) The site and facilities are adequate; therefore, there will be no impact to air, water, or rail traffic. f) The project is consistent with the Circulation Plan for the CiD' and will not increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Public Services: a) The project will require additional permitting and inspection by the Fire District to ensure Code compliance. The impact is not significant. b) No increase in police services is expected as a result of this project. c) No increase in the number of school pupils is expected as a result of this project. d) The project will have no impact on existing park facilities or result in the need for '-additional facilities. Frontage street improvements will be installed consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The City will maintain all public streets dedicated and installed per City Standards. There is no significant impact. No other government services are expected to be affected by this proposal. e) Energy a) The project is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. Utilities and Service Systems: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 4 XVII. XVIII. XXIo a) The project will not result in the need for new power or natural gas systems. b) The project will not result in the-need for new communication systems. c) The project will use water readily available to the site. d) Restroom and shower facilities will be provided and drain to an on-site septic system built to conform to City codes. e) Additional storm water drainage can be accommodated by a new on-site project which will convey waters to existing, acceptable storm drain facilities consistent with City codes and policies. The impact is not significant. f) No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. Human Health: a) The project is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. Aesthetics: a) The project will not obstruct any view or vista currently available to the public. b) House Museum is a permitted use on this site subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The retention and enhancement of the grove and landscaping consistent with City codes will create an aesthetic site visible to the public. Recreation: a) No existing recreational facilities will be impacted by the project. b) No 'known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. Cultural Resources: a) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. b) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. Mandatory Findings of Significance: a) No known animal or wildlife species are expected to be substantially adversely impacted by the project. b) There are no known long-term environmental impacts that are expected to occur as a ~ -~result of the project. c) It is not anticipated that the cumulative impacts of the project will have a substantial impact as a result of the project. d) It is not anticipated that the project will have any adverse impacts on human beings. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation. Discussion has been incorporated into items above. Discussion of Land Use Impacts. The site is identified as Very Low Density in the General Plan. The project is a conditionally permitted use in the Very Low Density area of the City. With conditions, the 15-7o ¼" ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 5 project will be consistent with City codes and the General Plan and there will be no significant land use impacts. herein have been added to the project; DECLARATION will be prepared. XXIV. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures described therefore, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE Larrv Henderson, AICP Print Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division April 3, 1996 Date Gity of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: LD 96-01,LA 96-01,CUP 96-09 & DR 96-03 Public Review Period Closes: Project Name: Maloof Relocation Project Applicant: SAN BAG Project Location (also see attached map): Southeast Corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets - APN 1061-281-16 Project Description: Relocation of historic Maloof Residence and Accessory Structures, and conversion of same to museum / arts and crafts center, and construction of a new two bedroom residence. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related doc'[inients are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ~EPORT MALOOF RELOCATION Northeast Corner of Carnelian and Hidden Farm 3/4/96 Revised April 1996 Introduction The original-drainage report for the canyon, tributary to the 5+ acre Maloof Relocation site, was prepared for Tract 10277-1 (King Ranch)in December of 1981. The conventional Rational Method for calculating flow quantities was utilized at that time. Current hydrology methods hav~ become computerized and the meth'odology has changed, becoming more conservative in calculating flows. The end result is generally an increase in flow rates when using today's methodology. Summary of the Hydroloq¥ Report for Tract 10277-1 The Linville Report for King Ranch calculated a flow rate of approximately 38 cfs at Almond Street. When bulked, the flow rate is increased to 57 cfs. An existing 24" diameter CMP with a capacity of 27 cfs was left in place and supplemented by a 24" diameter RCP with a capacity of 43 cfs for a total capacity of 70 cfs which exceeded the bulked Q of 57 cfs. This report assumes that all flows from King Ranch, Phase 2, and the tributary areas above reach the future Maloof property ( see Exhibit "B" ). The water from King Ranch then empties into a natural channel running along the east side of the new Maloof property. The channel is a vee-shaped natural watercourse with a capacity much greater than what currently gets there. Once in the natural channel, the water flows to an existing 24" diameter pipe in Hidden Farm Road. Hidden Farm is a narrow private road that has a low point at the crossing. Any flows currently escaping the pipe cross the roadway and continue on in the natural channel. The nat, ural channel contains heavy vegetation with some evidence of erosion. Summary of Associated Enc~ineers Calculations Associated Engineers re-ran the hydrology calculations using the current San Bernardino County criterion of AES software, version 5.1 released January 1, 1995. The current software projects a Qlco of 112 cfs in the natural channel coming from King Ranch. The increased Q10o was then used to size the proposed new pipe crossing Hidden Farm Road. Water from the Maloof property and Hidden Farm to the east is calculated to put a Q~co of 30 c¢-s in the roadway, approximately 15 cfs from each direction. The Maloof project will construct at12' catch basin in the sump area of Hidden Farm Road as part of the street improvements. The rc~adway will be designed to convey the 15 cfs from Maloof to the basin. Other future improvements to Hidden Farm Road may be required to convey the full 30 cfs to the new catch basin. The proposed new pipe in Hidden Farm Road will be a 48" diameter RCP. One 14' section of 48" diameter RCP will extend upstream from the catch basin to a headwall in the natural channel. A section 48' in length will extend southerly from the catch basin to the south side of Hidden Farm Road. The flowline of the natural channel should be improved to accommodate the new pipe. Conclusions The Q100 flows that drain southerly in the natural channel crossing the future Maloof property will not increase in volume. The improvements that will be done to the property will increase the total runoff slightly, resulting in a little more water in Hidden Farm Road. The street widening improvements to Hidden Farm Road will result in the water from Maloof staying on the north side of the street. Nuisance flows will be contained in the new gutter area, flowing to the new catch basin at the southeast corner of the property. The flows will then get to the existing r~atural channel via a new 48 "diameter RCP under Hidden Farm Road. Upstream and downstream minor improvements at each end of the pipe should help control erosion. The proposed street improvements in Hidden Farm Road will end the condition that now exists where storm water that exceeds the capacity of the existing 24"pipe causes the street to flood. This in turn has been promoting erosion of the surface soil on the south side of Hidden Farm Road. In order to completely control erosion of the natural channel south of Hidden Farm Road, further improvements to the natural channel such as hardscape and water-bars will be necessary, in lieu of a totally enclosed storm drain system. ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC, 33! ! East Shelby S~reet ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91764 (909) 980-1982 FAX (909) 941-089! .0 ,® y~ F::x,d- / ~3/7-'- FJ PRESSURE PIPE-FLOW HYDRAULICS COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: LACFD,LACRD,& OCOMA Htq)RAULICS CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1982-94 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 5.64 Release Date' 6/01/94 License ID 1404 Analysis prepared by: ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS consulting civil engineers 3311 E. SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91764 TEL: (909)980-1982 FAX: (909)941-0891 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * MALOOF RESIDENCE DRAINAGE STUDY * * CULVERT h-fDRAULICS AT NODE 7 * * FILE M:~AES95~HIq)ROSFT~PIPEFLOW~96010R * FILE NAME: 96010P.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 10:30 4/ 9/1996 NOTE: STEADY FLOW HYDRAULIC HEAD-LOSS COMPUTATIONS BASED ON THE MOST CONSERVATIVE FORMULAE FROM THE CURRENT LACRD,LACFCD, AND OCEM_A DESIGN M;~NI3ALS. DOWNSTREAM PRESSURE PIPE FLOW CONTROL DATA: NODE NUMBER - 13.00 FLOW-LINE ELE~VATION - PIPE DIaMETER(INCH) - 48.00 PIPE FLOW(CFS) - ASSUMED DOWNSTRET~M CONTROL HGL - 80.000 L.A. THOMPSON'S EQUATION IS USED FOR JUNCTION ANALYSIS NODE 76.00 138.00 13.00 : HGL- < 80.000>;EGL- < 81o873>~FLOWLINE- < 76.000> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 1 UPSTREAM NODE 12.00 ELEVATION - .78.19 CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW FRICTION LOSSES(iACFCD)' PIPE FLOW - 138.00 CFS PIPE DIAMETER - ~PIPE LENGTH - 48.00 FEET MANNINGS N - 'SF-(Q/q<)**2 - (( 138.00)/( 1436.431))*'2 - ~HF-L*SF - ( 48.00)*( .0092297) - .443 &8.00 INCHES .01300 .0092297 NODE 12.00 ' HGL- < 80.443>;EGL- < 82.316>;FLOWLINE- < 78.190> PRESSURE FLOW ASSUMPTION USED TO AD3UST HGL AND EGL LOST PRESSURE HEAD USING SOFFIT CONTROL - 1.75 NODE 12.00 : HGL- < 82.190>;EGL- < 84.063>;FLOW-LINE- < 78.190> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE UPSTREAM NODE 12.00 ELEVATION - 78.19 CALCUL~iTE PRESSURE FLOW CATCH BASIN ENTRANCE LOSSES(LACFCD): PIPE FLOW(CFS) - 138.00 PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 48.00 PRESSURE FLOW VELOCITY HF_%D - 1.873 CATCH BASIN ENERGY LOSS - .2*(VELOCITY HEAD) - .2.(1.873) - NODE 12.00 : HGL- < 84.437>;EGL- < 84v437>;FLOW'LINE- < .375 78.190> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE - 5 UPSTREAM NODE 8.00 ELEVATION - 78.44 CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW JUNCTION LOSSES: NO. DISCHARGE DIAMETER AREA VELOCITY DELTA HV 1 115.0 48.00 12.566 9.151 .000 1.300 2 138.0 48.00 12.566 10.982 -- 1.873 3 .0 .00 .000 .000 .000 .4 .0 .00 .0Q0 .000 .000 5 23.0---Q5 EQUALS BASIN INPUT-- I.ACFCD AND OCEMA PRESSURE FLOW JIINCTION FOrE USED: DY-(Q2*V2-Ql*Vl*COS(DELTA1)-Q3*V3*COS(DELTA3)- Q4*V4*COS(DELTA4))/((Al+A2)*16.1) UPSTREAM MANNINGS N - .01300 DOWNSTREAM MANNINGS N - .01300 UPSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE - .00641 DOWNSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE - .00923 AVERAGED FRICTION SLOPE IN JUNCTION ASSUMED AS .00782 JUNCTION LENGTH(FEET) - 3.00 FRICTION LOSS - .023 ENTRANCE LOSSES - .375 JUNCTION LOSSES - DY+HV1-HV2+(FRICTION LOSS)+(EITIltANCE LOSSES) JUNCTION LOSSES - 1.144+ 1.300- 1.873+( .023)+( .375) - .970 NODE 8.00 : HGL- < 84.107>;EGL- < 85.407>;FLOW-LINE- < 78.&40> !PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE - 1 UPSTREAM NODE 7.00 ELEVATION - 79.00 CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW FRICTION LOSSES(LACFCD): PIPE FLOW - 115.00 CFS PIPE DIAMETER - 48.00 INCHES PIPE LENGTH - 15.00 FEET MANNINGS N - .01300 SF-(Q/K)**2 - (( 115.00)/( 1436.431))*-2 - .0064095 HF-L*SF - ( 15.00)*( .0064095) - .096 NODE 7.00 : HGL- < 84.203>:EGL- < 85.503>~FLOW-LINE- < 79.000> END OF PRESSURE FLOW HYDRAULICS PIPE SYSTEM 1.0 . 12 ~g Z.5 · 6 -- uJ.4-- Z' -- 0 L... Local del>reesl,~n ELEVATION /. -- .03 SECTION --5 --3 --2 O_ -- .4 L~J 0 - Z NOMOGRAM - CAPACITY, CURB INLET Plate 2.6-0651 AT SAG ¢.x'///,,~/% ~ -- 180 -- 168 -- 156 -- ~44 -- 132 -- 120 -- IO8 --96 "--84 ~ 72 ~-60 ---- .54 I ~J ~ --35 ~ 30 --27 ~-24 -- 10, 000 -- 8,000 -- 6.000 -- 5,OOO -- 4,000 -- 3,000 -- 2.000 -- 1,000 -- 800 -- 600 -- 500 -- 400 --300 u_ ~ -- 60 CO -- .%0 ~ _ HW --40 D --30 _--2O --I.0 EXAMPLE -- D-42 I.,ch*~ (3.5 120 2.5 Z.~ 7.4 ~.~ 7.T mO in feel' ENTRANCE SCALE TYPE proJ~cli~ C HART 2 -- 1.0 _ 1.0 -- .8 _ o$ .6 --.6 --.6 --.5 -~-- 12 HEADWATER SCALES REVISED MAY CUREAU OF PUBLIC ROA05 JAN· HEADWATER DEPTH FOR CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS WITH INLET CONTROL ;I :1 T4N RTW RATIONAL Q~0 METHOD ~.x,/7/~ 7-- to RATIONAL METHOD H~fDROLOGY GO~iPUTF~PROGR~ PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 SA~ BERNAHtDINO CO. HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-95 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 5.1 Release Date' 01/01/95 License ID 1404 Analysis prepared by: ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS consulting civil engineers 3311 E. SHEI~BY ST. ONTARIO, CA. 91764 TEL. (909)980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * MALOOF RESIDENCE DRAINAGE STUDY - OFFSITE A~D ONSITE RATIONAL METHOD * * QlO . * FILE M:kAES95kH~fDROSFT\RATSC5 . FILE NAME: 96010R.DAT TIME/DATE OF S?UDY: 9:54 4/ 9/1996 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND Htq)RAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) - 10.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) - 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECI~iAL) TO USE FOR ~RICTION SLOPE - *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFAJ-L* .90 SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CIIRVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) - .6000 USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSII-f(INCH/HOUR) - 1.1000 *ANTECEDENT MOISI-URE CONDITION (AMC II) ASSlIMED FOR RATIONAL PLETHOD* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ilNiTI~L'SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEQATION DATA' UPSTREAf~(FEET) - 2540.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2250.00 Tc- K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CH~GE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMllM Tc(MIN,) - 10.658 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSII~Y(INCH/HR) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA L~D USE GROUP (ACRES) NATURAL POOR COVER "OPEN BRUSH" B 10.00 .45 SUBAREA AVEraGE PERVIOUS LOSS ~TE, Fp(!NCH/HR) - SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA ~f~ACTION, Ap - 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 23.85 3.102 Fp Ap SCS Tc (INCH/H.R) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .45 1.00 76 10.66 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 10.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 23.85 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 5.1 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CH~EL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - -2250.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2150.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 1000.00 CHANNEL SLOPE - .1000 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 4.00 "Z" FACTOR - 1.500 MA_NNiNG'S FACTOR - .015 MAXIMTIM DEPTH(FEET) - 2.00 C~2q-NEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 23.85 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) - 14.44 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - .36 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.15 Tc(MIN.) - 11.81 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 8.2 >>>>>ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE, AT MAINLINE Tc,<<<<< >>>>>(AND COMPUTE INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF)<<<<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-I32qGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2250.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2150.00 Tc - K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ~NALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 11.002 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - SUBARiA Tc kND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL ARLA LA~D USE GROUP (ACRES) RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 7.00 .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(iNCH/I-LR) - SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .70 SUB~REA AREA(ACRES) - Fp Ap SCS Tc (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .70 56 11.00 .75 7.00 INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 15.88 ** ADD SUB~EA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE AT MAINLINE Tc: ~INLINE Tc(MIN) - 11.81 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 2.917 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 7.00 SUB~EA RUNOFF(CFS) - 15.08 fEFFECTIVE ARLA(ACRES) - 17.00 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - ].ARL~-AvE~GED Fp(INCH/HR) - .55 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .88 TOT%L AREA(ACRES) - 17.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 37.26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREA~M TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.81 P~INFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 2.92 .~%LA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .48 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .55 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .88 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 17.00 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 17.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 37.26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2480.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2200.00 Tc - K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMIIM Tc(MIN.) - 8.955 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 3.444 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) NATURAL POOR COVER "OPEN BRUSH" B 2.00 .45 RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 5.00 .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - .64 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .79 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 18.53 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - Ap (DECIMAL) 1.00 .7O 7.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 18.53 SCS Tc CN (KIN.) 76 10.73 56 8.95 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE - 6.1 ~>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARO CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) - 2200.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) - 2150.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 CUR~B HEIGHT(INCHES) - 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) - 18.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GE~DEBRKAK(FEET) - INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 ]SPECI~IE~ NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF - 2 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 13.00 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) - STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - .42 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) - 14.57 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCI2~Y(FEET/SEC.) - 6.20 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) -- 2.59 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 2.69 Tc(MIN.) - * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 2.942 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(~MC II): DEVELOPMENT %YPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp L~D USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/fiR) 27.81 11.64 Ap SCS (DECIMAL) CN RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 8.50 .75 .70 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/7{R) - .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap -- .70 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 8.50 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 18.50 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/tiR) - .51 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .70 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .74 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 33.87 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) - .44 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) - 15,74 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 6.52 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) - 2.88 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ALOE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.64 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 2.94 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .51 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .70 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .74 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 33.87 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STReaM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap NU~LBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/1-LR) 1 37.26 11.81 2,917 .55(.48) .88 2 33.87 11.64 2.942 .70(.51) .74 ~INFALL INTENSITY AND TI~E OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. Ae (ACRES) 17.00 15.50 SOURCE NODE .00 .00 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STReaM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) 1 70.8 11.81 2.917 .613(.497) 2 71.0 11.64 2.942 .614(.497) iCOMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS' PEAk FLOW RATE(CFS) - 70.98 Tc(MIN.) - EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 32.25 ~REA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .61 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 32.50 Ap Ae (ACRES) .81 32.5 .81 32.3 11.64 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/TLR) - AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .81 SOURCE NODE .00 .00 .50 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.10 IS CODE - 4.1 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREA~ NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2130.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2120.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 60.00 MANNING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCI/'Y(FEET/SEC.) - 26.42 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 24.00 NUlW_BER OF PIPES - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 70.98 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .04 Tc(MIN.) - 11.68 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.10 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE - 5.1 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CI~EL FLOW<<<<< >>>>~TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2126.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2083.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 475.00 CHANNEL SLOPE - .0905 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 15.00 "Z" FACTOR - 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .040 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 10.00 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 70.98 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) - 7.43 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - .59 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.07 Tc(MIN.) - 12.74 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.10 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE - 8.2 >>>>>ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE, AT MAINLINE Tc,<<<<< >>>>>(AND COMPUTE INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF)<<<<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 475.00 ELEVATION DATA' UPSTRETuM(FEET) - 2126.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2083.00 Tc- K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(~LEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 5.784 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.477 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) '(INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) AGRICULTURAL GOOD COVER "ORCHARDS" B 1.80 .72 1.00 58 17.79 COMMERCIAL B .90 .75 .10 56 5.78 fSUBAREA AVER_AGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - .73 ]SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .70 SUBkREA AREA(ACRES) - 2.70 INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 9.65 ** ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE AT MAINLINE Tc: MAINLINE Tc(MIN) - 12.74 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 2.787 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 2.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 5.54 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 34.95 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .62 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .80 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 35.20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - .5O 72.00 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE - 4.1 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-1;'LOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2083.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2082.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 10.00 MA. NNING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 36.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 25.99 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 36.00 NUMBER OF PIPES - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 72.00 PI~E TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .01 Tc(MIN.) - 12,75 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE - 10 >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 850.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2145.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2085.00 Tc - K*{(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHTuNGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 7.672 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INT~NSITY(INCH/HR) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(~MC ~DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL I~WD USE GROUP AGRICULTURAL POOR COVER "ORCHARDS" B C0~MERCIAL B 3.779 II): AREA Fp Ap (ACRES) (INCH/H~) (DECI~i~L) 1.50 .50 1.00 1.50 .75 .10 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA ~-RACTION, Ap - .55 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 9,42 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .52 3.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 9.42 SCS Tc CN (MIN.) 73 13.25 56 7.67 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 10,00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 7,67 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/H~) - 3.78 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - ,29 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - ,52 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .55 EFFECTIVE STREA~M AREA(ACRES) - 3,00 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 3.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 9.42 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION HOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENG%H(FEET)-- 800.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2160.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2085.00 Tc - I~*~(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 10.193 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AP~ LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) RESIDENTIAL "2 DWEI/~INGS/ACRE" B 4. O0 .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/}iR) - SUBPJLEA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AR3.A FRACTION, Ap - .70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 9.59 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 3.186 Fp Ap SCS Tc (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .75 .70 56 10.19 4.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.59 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NI/M_BER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 10.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/H~.) - 3.19 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/]tR) - .52 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .75 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .70 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 4.00 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 4.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 9.59 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae SOURCE NIIPiBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/IRR) (INCH/ttR) (ACRES) NODE f1 9.42 7.67 3.779 .52(.29) .55 3.00 .00 2 - 9.59 10.19 3.186 .75( .52) .70 4.00 .00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(~m) Ap Ae SOURCE NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 18.2 7.67 3,779 .650(.406) .63 6.0 .00 2 17.4 10.19 3.186 .665(.423) .64 7.0 .00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEA/< FLOW RATE(CFS) - 18.24 Tc(MIN.) - 7.67 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 6.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/Q-LR) - .65 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 7.00 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .63 .41 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 11 >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MFJ~ORY<<<<< ** M~AIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM- - Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) NIJM~BER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/ltR) 1 18.24 7.67 3.779 .65( .41) 2 17.41 10.19 3.186. .67( .42) LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE Ap Ae SOURCE (ACRES) NODE .63 6.0 .00 .64 7.0 .00 12.00 - .00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) N/3iW. BER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/%{R) 1 72.00 12.75 2.786 .62( .50) 2 71.79 12.92 2.763 .62( .50) LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE Ap Ae SOURCE (ACRES) NODE .80 35.0 .00 .80 35.2 .00 12.00 - .00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TAJ~LE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity mJWmER (CFS) (HIN.) (INCH/HR) 1 80.4 7.67 3.779 2 85.0 10.19 3.186 3 86.9 12.75 2.786 4 86.5 12.92 2.763 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 Fp(Fm) Ap Ae SOURCE (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE .626(.478) .76 27.0 .00 .629(.483) .77 34.9 .00 .627(.486) .77 42.0 .00 .627(.485) .77 42.2 .00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 86.88 Tc(MIN.) - 12.751 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 41.95 AREA-AVEiLAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .49 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/qtR) - .63 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .77 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE 12.00 - .00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE - 4.1 -~ ...... :7~ ................................................................. i>>>>SCOMPUTE PIPE-FLOW Tk~VEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>~>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2078.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2076.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 48.00 MA_NiNING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 48.0 INCH PIPE IS 18.4 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 19.56 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 86.88 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - END OF STUDY SU~Y: 48.00 NUMBER OF PIPES - ,04 Tc(M!N.) - 12,79 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 EFFECTIVE A-REA(ACRES) - 41.95 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .63 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 86.88 TC(MIN.) - 12.79 A~-AVERAGED l~m( INCH/}LR)- AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .77 ** PEAK FIDW RATE TABLE ** S?REA~ Q NOYmE~ (¢FS) 1 80.4 2 85.0 3 86.9 .4 _ - 86.5 Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/QiR) 7.71 3.766 -.626(.478) .76 10.23 3.179 .629(.483) .77 12.79 2.781 .627(·486) .77 12.97 2.758 .627(.485) .77 END OF RATIONAL ME/HOD ANALYSIS, Ae (^¢RZS) 27.0 34.9 42.0 42.2 .49 SOURCE NODE .00 · 00 .00 .00 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER~ PROGRAM PACkaGE (Reference: 1986 SAN BERNARDINO CO. HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-95 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 5.1 Release Date: 01/01/95 License ID 1404 Analysis prepared by: ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS consulting civil engineers .... 3311 E. SHELBY ST. ONTARIO, CA. 91764 TEL. (909)980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * ~LOOF RESIDENCE DRAINAGE STUDY OFFSITE AND ONSITE RATIONAL METHOD * * Q100 - * * FILE M'kAES95kHYDROSFTkRATSC5 * FILE NAME: 96010R.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 9:53 4/ 9/1996 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION' --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) - 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) - 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR ~RICTION SLOPE - *USER-DEFINED LOG~RITt~MIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFAIL* .9O SLOPE OF INTENS!2'Y DUraTION CURVE(LOG(t;iN/~R) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) - .6000 USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) - 1.6100 ~MTECEDENT MO!S2qfRE CONDITION (~MC II) ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ~NALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION HOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ~INITI~L'SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2540.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2250.00 Tc - K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CH~GE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 10.658 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA LAiND USE GROUP (ACRES) NATUraL POOR COVER "OPEN BRUSH" B 10.00 .45 SUBA_REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(iNCH/HR) - SUB~REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA ~RACTION, Ap - 1.00 SUB~REA RUNOFF(CFS) - 36.80 4.541 Fp Ap SCS Tc (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .45 1.00 76 10.66 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 10.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 36.80 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 5.1 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHAATNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBARL~<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - -2250.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ElEVATION(FEET) - 2150.00 C~NNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 1000.00 C~HqNEL ~LOPE - .1000 C~NNEL BASE(FEET) - 4.00 "Z" FACTOR - 1.500 MTuVNING'S FACTOR - .015 MAXIMIIM DEPTH(FEET) - 2.00 CH~NEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 36.80 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) - 16.63 FlOW DEPTH(FEET) - .47 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.00 Tc(MIN.) - 11.66 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 8.2 >>>>>ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE, AT MAINLINE Tc,<<<<< >>>>>(AND COMPUTE INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF)<<<<< INITIAL SUBAREA FlOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTRF~(FEET) - 2250.00 DOWlqSTREA_M(FEET) - 2150.00 Tc - K*[(LENCTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHA2qCE)}** .20 SUBAJtEA ~NALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 11.002 * 100 YEAR k~INFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.455 SUB~REA Tc AND lOSS PATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT I-YPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp I_AND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) gESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 7.00 .75 SUB~REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - SUB~REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .70 SUB.~RL~ AREA(ACRES) - Ap SCS Tc (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .70 56 11.00 .75 7.00 INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 24.77 ** ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE AT MAINLINE Tc: ~INLINE Tc(MIN) - 11.66 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.302 SUB.~REA AR~(ACRES) - 7,00 SUB~REA RUNOFF(CFS) - 23.81 fEFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 17.00 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - lkRL~AV~RAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .55 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .88 TOTkL AREA(ACRES) - 17.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - .48 58.46 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAaM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NIIMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM -TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.66 ~RINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.30 g~EA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .48 1 ARE: AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/ItR) - .55 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - . 88 EFFECTIVE STREA~M AP~EA(ACRES) - 17.00 TOTAL STREA~M AREA(ACRES) - 17 . 00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 58.46 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION HOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2480.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2200.00 Tc - K*[ (LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE) ]** . 20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 8.955 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 5.041 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) NATURAL POOR COVER "OPEN BRUSH" B 2.00 .45 1.00 76 10.73 RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 5.00 . 75 . 70 56 8.95 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - .64 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .79 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 28.59 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 7.00 PETd< FLOW RATE(CFS) - 28.59 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE - 6.1 ~>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CUtLB SECTION USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) - 2200.00 DOWNSTREAM EI~VVATION(FEET) - 2150.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) - 1000.00 CI/RB HEIGHT(INCHES) - 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) - 18.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBRr_AK(FEET) - INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 ~PECIFIED-NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF - 2 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 13.00 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) - STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - .47 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) - 17.37 AVEPAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 6.91 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) - 3.27 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 2.41 Tc(MIN.) - * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.369 ..SUBAREA LOSS PATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL ARLA Fp LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/~R) 43.34 11.36 Ap SCS (DECIMAL) CN .RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 8.50 · 75 . 70 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap -- . 70 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 8,50 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 29.42 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - . 51 AREA-AVERAGED Fp (INCH/HR) - . 70 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - . 74 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 53.77 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) - . 50 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) - 18 . 01 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC. ) - 7.45 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC. ) - 3.73 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.36 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.37 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .51 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .70 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .74 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 TOTAL STREA~M AREA(ACRES) - 15.50 PEA~K FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 53.77 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STReaM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) NU~SER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/+m) (INCH/+m) 1 58.46 11.66 4.302 .55(.48) 2 53.77 11.36 4.369 .70(.51) 'RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMRJLA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. Ap Ae SOURCE (ACRES) NODE .88 17.00 .00 .74 15.50 .00 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STRF-AM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/}iR) (INCH/Q{R) (ACRES) 1 111.3 11.66 4.302 .613(.497) .81 32.5 2 111.7 11.36 4.369 .614(.497) .81 32.1 COMPUTED' CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PF_~K FLOW RATE(CFS) - 111.74 Tc(MIN.) - 11.36 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 32.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/TiR) - AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .61 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 32.50 SOURCE NODE .00 .00 .5O FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.10 IS CODE - 4.1 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREA~M NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2130.00 ~2~z~/~/f" ~ DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2120,00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 60.00 MANNING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.9 INOHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 29.56 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 24.00 NIRiBER OF PIPES - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 111.74 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .03 Tc(MIN.) - 11.40 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.10 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE - 5.1 >>>>>COMPUTE TItAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>~TRAVELTIME TItRU SUBAREA<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2126.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2083 . 00 CH.AN/qEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 475.00 CHA/qNEL SLOPE - . 0905 CltANNEL BASE(FEET) - 15.00 "Z" FACTOR - 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .040 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 10.00 CHA/q/qEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 111.74 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC) - 8.73 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - . 77 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .91 Tc(MIN.) - 12.31 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.10 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE - 8.2 >>>>>ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE, AT MAINLINE Tc,<<<<< >>>>>(AND COMPUTE INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF)<<<<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) - 475.00 ELEVATION DATA' UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2126.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - ~c - K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(~LEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/Hi{) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) AGRICULTURAL GOOD COVER "ORCHARDS" B 1.80 COMMERCIAL B .90 5.78A 6.552 Fp Ap · (INCH/~m) (DECIMAL) 2083.00 :SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - iSUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA ~RACTION, Ap - .70 SUBA~EA AREA(ACRES) - SCS Tc CN (MIN.) .72 1.00 58 17.79 .75 .10 56 5.78 .73 2.70 INITIAL SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 14.69 ** ADD SUBAREA RUNOFF TO MAINLINE AT MAINLINE Tc: ~INLINE Tc(MIN) - 12.31 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 4.165 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 2.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 8.89 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 34.77 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - ARL~-AVERAGED Fp(tNCH/HR) - .62 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .80 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 35.20 PETCK FLOW RATE(CFS) - .50 114.76 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE - &.l >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2083.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2082.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 10.00 MA/~NING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 36.0 INCH PIPE IS 19.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 29.27 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 36.00 NI/MBER OF PIPES - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 114.76 PIPE TRA-VEL TIME(MIN.) - .01 Tc(MIN.) - 12.31 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE - 10 >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY B~HqK # 1 <<<<< FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRA.PH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-L~NGTH(FEET) - 850.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2145.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2085.00 Tc - K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 7.672 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) - 5.531 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): ~DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp I3~ND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) ACRICULTUR~L POOR COVER "ORCMA.t:U)S" S 1.50 .50 COMMERCIAL B 1.50 .75 SUB~REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS KATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - .52 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .55 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 14.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - Ap SCS Tc (DECI~L) CN (MIN.) 1.00 73 13.25 .10 56 7.67 3.00 PEA]< FLOW RATE(CFS) - 14.15 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 7.67 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/I-JR) - 5.53 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - .29 ~EA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/qiR) - .52 ~AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .55 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 3,00 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 3.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 14.15 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 2.1 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREAANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAtLLA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-7.~NGTH(FEET)-- 800.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) - 2160.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) - 2085.00 Tc- K*~(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) - 10.193 * 100' YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/t{R) - SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) RESIDENTIAL "2 DWELLINGS/ACRE" B 4.00 .75 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) - SUB~REA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap - .70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 14.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 4.664 Fp Ap SCS Tc (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) .75 .70 56 10.19 4.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 14.90 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL N/IMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREJ2{ 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTk~TION(MIN.) - 10.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/H~.) - 4.66 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/qiR) - .52 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .75 ~RL~-AVERAGED Ap - .70 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 4.00 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 4.00 PEAJ< FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 14.90 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae SOURCE NlJMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (tNCH/HR) (INCH/}{R) (ACRES) NODE 1 14.15 7.67 5.531 .52(.29) .55 3.00 .00 2~ --'14.90 10.19 4.664 .75(.52) .70 4.00 .00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PLaK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae SOURCE NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 27.7 7.67 5.531 .650( .406) .63 6.0 .00 2 26.7 10.19 4.664 .665( .423) .64 7.0 .00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS' PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 27.72 Tc(MIN.) - 7.67 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 6.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .65 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 7.00 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) - AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .63 .41 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE - 11 >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAF~ - Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/RR) (INCH/IiR) 1'' 27.72 7.67 5.531 .65( .41) .- 2 26.72 10.19 4.664 .67( .42) LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE Ap Ae SOURCE (ACRES) NODE .63 6.0 .00 .64 7.0 .00 12.00 - .00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/}{R) 1 114.76 12.31 4.164 .62(.50) 2 114.34 12.60 4.106 .62(.50) LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE Ap Ae SOURCE (ACRES) NODE .80 34.8 .00 .80 35.2 .00 12.00 - .00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae SOURCE NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/}iR) (INCH/}IR) (ACRES) NODE 1 125.9 7.67 5.531 .627(.478) .76 27.7 .00 2 134.7 10.19 4.664 .629( .483) .77 35.8 .00 3 138.3 12.31 4.164 .628( .486) .77 41.8 .00 4 137.5 12.60 4.106 .627( .485) .77 42.2 .00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 qOMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEA/< FLOW RATE(CFS) - 138.33 Tc(MIN.) - 12.311 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 41.77 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/ltR) - .49 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) - .63 AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .77 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE .00 TO NODE 12.00 - .00 FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE - 4.1 >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>~>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2078.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) - 2076.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) - 48.00 MAArNING'S N - .013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 48.0 INCH PIPE IS 23.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) - 22.11 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 48.00 NUMBER OF PIPES - PIPE-FLOW(CFS) - 138.33 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .04 Tc(MIN.) - 12.35 END OF STUDY SU~SMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 42.20 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) - 41.77 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/qiR) - .63 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 138.33 TC(MIN.) - 12.35 AREA-AVERAGED Pm(INCH/IiR)- AREA-AVERAGED Ap - .77 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TAJSLE ** STREAM Q NU~mFa (CFS) 1 125.9 2 134.7 3 138.3 _4 ___ 137.5 Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) 7.71 5.515- .627( .478) .76 10.23 4.654 .629( .483) .77 12.35 4.157 .628( .486) .77 12.64 4.099 .627( .485) .77 Ae (ACRES) 27.7 35.8 41.8 42.2 F~.D OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS .49 SOURCE NODE .00 .00 .00 .00 .2:: · -'~"'F,~ ~ :.~..-',., ~-..:,~ .'5' ,~;.-',.c,. i~.,,- ·,, ,,~;.:': ~: .. Pt~ELIMINA ASSOCIATED 'FIC ANALYSIS ENGINEEiRS ' 3311 East Shelby Street * Ontario, CA 91764 o~,, t5 -10ro TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE MALOOF RELOC/~TION CUP 96-02 Settin~ The Project Area is located in the VL Zone at the northeast comer of Carnelian and Hidden Farm Road. The site consists of 5.54 acres of citrus grove that could be developed into.8 single family residential lots of approximately 0.5 acres each. The p.roject site is located at the northerly terminus of Carnelian Avenue where it tees-into Almond Street. Existing Traffic in the Project Area Currently there is limited traffic in the project area because of th'e location. There is essentially no throUgh-traffic since Carnelian Avenue ehds at the site. King Ranch, a residential area immediately north of the project site is a gated development consisting of approximately 30 lots, of which about 20 are currently built on. · Bella Vista, directly to the west of the Project, is a barricaded street that has 20 existing houses and 2 vacant lots. Carnelian Avenue has 2 houses opposite the Project Area which front the street. Hidden Farm Road is a dead-end street with cuPde-sacs off of it. All totaled there are approximately 22 houses currently in that area east of the Project. The approximate sum of the existing lots and future lots (when built upon) is 78 single family lots. There is .potential for future development northwest of the project in an area that is currently a citrus grove. Based on the commonly accepted cdteda of 10 Average Daily Tdps (ADT) per household, the existing houses generate 620 trips each day. After all lots are developed, this number will increase to an average of 780 daily tdps for the area. Project Traffic After Development of Project Site Development as 8 Single Family F~esidences If the project site were developed as 8 single family residences, the ADT for this neighborhood would increase by 80 to a total of 700 tdps each day for existing development (an increase of 12.9%) or 860 tdps each day for ultimate development (an increase of 10.3%). 2. Development as the Maloof Relocation Project The Maloof Relocation Project will present a unique traffic flow that will not be based on ~comm_only.used ADT numbers, but rather the specific use that is proposed. The historical residence Arts and Crafts Center will have 3 full-time employees in the woodworking workshop. The employees live off-site. Based on a trip to work each day and a tdp home each night, two tdps per employees are generated. If they each go off-site for lunch, two more trips per employee are generated for a total of 12 tdps per day for 5 days a week. This equates to 9 ADT .... ~-.~-.._- ..... .'.1 ;..? ,'-=' ,¢":: ' The Maloof Foundation will ultimately employ 2 full-time employees. They will have the potential for 4 tdps each for a total of 8 trips per day 5 days each week for an ADT of 6. The new Maloof residence will generate the average 10 tdps per day. The Citrus grove will, at some point, require maintenance and harvesting of the fruit. For this study, an assumption will be made that I person making 4 average daily tdps will possibly be feasible. Harvesting any citrus crop will generate a short-term pedodic traffic flow of 1 picker making 2 daily tdps. The total umber of'trips will depend on the type of citrus trees planted and the numbers of each type, since the different species are harvested-at different times of the year. We will assume for this report that 1 picker working full-time for 10 weeks can handle the harvesting of the approximately 3 acres of citrus trees. This will equate to 100 trips total or 1/2 average daily tdp. Artists in Residence could number 2 and could theoretically equate to a single family household that will generate 10 average daily tdps. Visitors to the Center make up the final category of known trip generators. They may ardve by a single bus or by other high occupancy vehicles such as vans. The number of visitors at any one time will be limited to a maximum of 60. If they do not arrive by bus,. personal vehicles will be limited to 20 to encourage car-pooling and to meet the parking restrictions of the Center. Thus the worst cast scenado would be 20 vehicles ardving and leaving in a 4 hour pedod. Only one group will be allowed each day for a maximum 3 days per week. This will equate to an ADT of 17. In summation, the total ADT to be generated by the Maloof Relocation Project is as follows: Average Maximum Forecasted Daily Tdps Daily Trips* Arts & Crafts Center Employees 9 ADT Maloof Foundation Employees 6 ADT Maloof Residence 10 ADT Citrus Maintenance & Harvesting 0.3 ADT Artists-in-Residence 10 ADT Visitors 17 ADT Miscellaneous Deliveries / Pickups 10 ADT 62.3 ADT 12 8 10 8 10 4O 10 98 trips/day ' Assumes aft max/mum trips occur on the same day with all visitors arriving and departing in ~ maxim_um. number of vehicles. Parkinq: All parking for the Project site will be provided on-site. It is expected that high occupancy vehicles and automobiles will utilize the on-site parking. Busses will be required to drop visitors off, leave and then return for pickup. The Project site contains 25 spaces at the Arts and Crafts a_rea, 2 of which are handicap spaces, 2 guest spaces at the Maloof residence and a 2-car garage at the Maloof residence for a total of 29 on-site parking spaces. Parking on the street will be as allowed by City Ordinance. Conclusions The number of Average Daily Tdps generated by the Maloof Relocation Project appears to be approximately 30% less than if the land was developed as 8 single family residences (57.3 ADT vs. 80 ADT). High-volume visits to the Center by groups of up to 60 people will be ..... scheduled durfng off-peak hours when the regular traffic movements for the area are the least. This should help to avoid any traffic-related inconvenience to the area residents. If all pdtential users of the site for the Maloof Project were to be on-site on the same day and generate their maximum number of tdps each, the number of trips is 23% higher than if the property is developed as an 8 lot single family residence project. The likelihood of this occurring is small. The expected traffic volumes are very minimal for the intended use of this project. The impact on the immediate community should be minimal as well. - RECEIVED April 9, 1996 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga Subject: Maloof relocation pro~ect APR 1 ] 1996 of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Dear Brad, I have received notice of a public hearing scheduled for April 24, 1996 regarding the relocation of the Maloof residence / workshop. Unfortunately, I will be out'of town on business and will not be able to attend. This letter is generated to address my concerns regarding this important project. My interest is due to the proximity of my unimproved lot APN 1061-271-33 (on the south side of Hidden Farm Rd. directly opposite Sunstone St.) to the retocation site. It was a pleasure to meet this past March 28 with you and some of the other people involved with the project. I was greatly impressed with the professionalism of the presentation and the plans. The representative of the engineering firm made a comment that an existing drainage pipe under Hidden Farm Rd. would be replaced with a larger (diameter, I assume) pipe. This indicates to me that the planned improvements will generate a greater amount of rainwater runoff. As the effluence from the existing pipe can erode my property, I am concerned about a greater amount of runoff exiting the pipe. Th~ other problem I have with the project is the installation of street lighting which I believe will not benefit the rural atmosphere of the area. As I am currently working on plans to build a residence on my lot, I hope that you will address my concerns in lieu of my absence at the April 24 meeting if not before. I shall return home on April 26 and would be glad to discuss these issues by phone, mail, or in person. Thankyou in advance for your attention to my letter. Sincerely, Harvey Porter 10702 Finch Ave. Alta Loma, Ca. 91737 (909) 945-1224 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 96-01 TO DESIGNATE THE MALOOF RESIDENCE AND WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9553 HIGHLAND AVENUE AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT __T_HEREOF - APN: 202-101-18. A. Recitals. 1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for a Landmark designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark designation request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ! 2. The application applies to approximately 5 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 9553 Highland Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1' The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact/s: The property is the home and studio of the internationally acclaimed woodworker and furniture designer Sam Maloof and his wife Alfreda Ward Maloof, a former Santa Fe museum and crafts program director. Sam Maloof began making furniture at his Alta Loma workshop in the 1950s. His work can be seen in a number of American museums and has been featured in numerous television and film productions as well as popular and scholarly works on American furniture and crafts. His home/studio has been a pilgrimage site for local colleges and universities, and HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. LD96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE) April 24, 1996 Page 2 the Gamble House Associates of Pasadena conduct an annual tour to the property. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding 1' The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed Landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. FacVs: The home/studio exhibits an exceptional level of craftsmanship and design. Hand-built homes became part of the popular culture of the 1960s and 1970s as part of the back-to-earth counterculture movement. Finding 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. FacVs: Sam Maloof's house and workshop are both the products of necessity which evolved over time. The house is also a product of its builde¢s creativity and his love of his craft and its raw material, wood. Every detail is crafted to reflect Maloof's sense of design and passion for wood. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, as Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation 96-01. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. LD96-01 - SANBAG (MALOOF HOUSE) April 24, 1996 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolu~tion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 96-01 FOR THE MALOOF HOUSE AND WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9_553 HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE MOVED TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND ALMOND STREETS - APN: 1061-281-16. A. Recitals. 1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for a Landmark Alteration Permit as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. Bo 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to the residence and workshops currently located at 9553 Hi_ghland Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga and proposed to be moved to a 5.54 acre site at the southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Chapter 22.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: Finding: Fact: The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance. The Landmark Alteration, as conditioned, will enhance and promote the economic viability of this historic landmark. Finding' The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature. Fact; The proposed modifications will rehabilitate and assist in the continued use of the structures and grove on the new site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, ~ogether with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the HPC/PC RESOLUTION NO. LAP 96-01 - MALOOF HOUSE April 24, 1996 Page 2 application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmer~al Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Historic Preservation Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudrig the public hearing, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. a) All exterior site and building modifications shall be submitted to Planning Division staff in the form of detailed plans and specifications before moving or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. b) All replacement materials shall be of in-kind type, size, and quality whenever possible. c) The new residence and garage shall be designed to match the house and shall be in conformance with the plans presented with this application. : .-d) All Plans and specifications shall conform to the Secretan/of Interior Standards for rehabilitation and be reviewed and accepted by the California Office of Historic Preservation. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HPC/PC RESOLUTION NO. LAP 96-01 - MALOOF HOUSE April 24, 1996 Page 3 BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATT. EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-09 TO CON~ERT AN EXISTING RESIDENCE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO A HOUSE AND WORKSHOP MUSEUM (ARTS AND CRAFTS CENTER), LOCATED IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1061-281-16. A. Recitals. 1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 96-09, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Carnelian and Almond Streets with street frontages on four sides and presently improved with an abandoned Citrus Grove; and b. The property to the north, east, and west of the subject site is developed Very Low Density Re~i_d_ential, the property to the south consists of undeveloped Very Low Density designated land. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96-09 - SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 2 c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. __ B__ased upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during'the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) As provided for in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.12.030A.5. the City Planner has approved that 7 of the required parking spaces in the locations shown in the attached Site Plan Exhibit may be of an alternative surface material in order to provide additional pervious surface area adjacent to the grove areas. Said areas shall be of a native or gravel materials with sufficient soil binders and barriers to control erosion and not constitute a nuisance. 2) House and Workshop Museum (Arts and Crafts Center) hours and operations shall be limited as follows: a) The site shall be open to the general public, but shall be limited to appointment-only supervised group tours and meetings. Said tours and meetings shall be limited to a maximum of 60 participants and be organized and supervised by the Maloof Foundation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96-09 - SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 3 b) Supervised tours and meetings shall be limited to a maximum of four days per week. c) Multiple events, including Foundation Board meetings or other group activities, shall be permitted on the same day as the previously referenced supervised tours and meetings but shall be separated by at least one-half hour between said activities. d) Supervised tours and meetings may take place only Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., subject to the other limitations set forth above. e) The use of buses for group tours is encouraged; however buses shall load and unload on-site and shall not park or wait on public streets within the residential neighborhood. 3) All applicable conditions of the Landmark Alteration Application shall be complied with and all structures and grounds shall be maintained in good and serviceable condition. Enqineering Division 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Carnelian Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the nodh side of Almond Street to the first pole south of Hidden Farm Road, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Carnelian Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Hidden Farm Road shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Carnelian Street to the center of Sunstone Avenue. 3) When widening Hidden Farm Road by 5 feet on the north side, the existing pavement section shall be reconstructed to current City standards. Also upgrade existing drainage improvements to current standards, for maintenance purposes, by replacing the existing CMP storm drain under Hidden Farm Road with RCP and providing appropriate improvements for overflows to prevent erosion. Provide a catch basin on the north side of Hidden Farm Road to discharge PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96-09 - SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 4 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) northerly into the natural earth channel. Install a cross-gutter at the Carnelian Street intersection. All street and storm drainage improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Make a good faith effort to acquire rights of entry to also install erosion protection measures within the natural earth channel on the south side of Hidden Farm Road. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for drainage purposes encompassing the existing earth channel along the east edge of this property. Replace the existing concrete trail fencing on the south side of Almond Street with PVC fencing and add a 2-rail fence adjacent to the street, outside the driveway and intersection lines of sight. Provide a transition to the new trail on the east side of Carnelian Street at that intersection, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The new Community Trail on the east side of Carnelian Street shall be installed per Standard 1002-A, with reference to Standard 1003 for the "front-on" condition (8-foot parkway). Inside trail fencing/block wall may be replaced with metal picket fence. Provide 12-foot Community Trail on Hidden Farm Road per Standard 1002-B. - All drive approaches crossing Community Trails shall have a transverse medium broom finish. Use the "contiguous sidewalk" at option of Standard 101-A on Almond Street and Hidden Farm Road. Install curb and gutter on the west side of Sunstone Avenue, adjacent to the existing edge of pavement. Complete the cul-de-sac bulb to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Provide adequate street dedication for the bulb and new curb and gutter. Also provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for the balance of the 60-foot ultimate right-of-way. "No Parking Any Time" signs shall be posted on Almond Street, Sunstone Avenue, and Carnelian Street. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to building permit issuance. 13) Make a good faith effort to obtain the vacated portion of Almond Street south of the Almond Trail (APN: 1061-281-15) so perimeter fence can be located at the top of slope. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96-09- SANBAG April 24, 1996 Pa~e 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD- CON DITIONS Fq~O-J ECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PLEASE CHECK THE STANDARD CONDITIONS THA T APPL Y TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits ~ Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. Completion Date / / / / / / / / 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to __/ / Approval of Tentative Tract No. __ is granted subject to the approval of The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. Prior. to .recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, .the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC. - 3t93 1 Completion Date This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district-within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development / / The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, and the Community Plan. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. / / Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. / / Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. / / A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Depa_r!ment (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate ,sb}le, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. SC - 3/9~ 2 11. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed · control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approvel and recordation of thc Final Troct Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. Completion Date / / / / Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement; however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. / / Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance may be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. / / Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official. 14. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&R's. 15. / / 17. / / The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. All-parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. / / / / Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of SC - 3/S6 Completion Date shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. % . The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and __/__/__ maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. ~f~ -- o I. Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall requife-a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic /Preservation Commission review and approval. 19. -The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development el'" ~4P, et~--for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 20. Six (6) foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least thirty (30) days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the projecrs perimeter. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / /__ and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to tl~e issuance of building permits. 2.':. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural /__/__ treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City __1__1__ Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Derails shall be included in building plans. £ D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. SC - 3196 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Completion Date driveway aisles, __/ /__ 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking-on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and - Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / / / / / / E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) ~~1- A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and modcl homc landscaping in this caso of rosidcntial development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prier final mRp npproval in the case of ~ nustom lot subdivi.~inn. '~~2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. / / A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: % - 48-inch box or larger % - 36-inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15~gallon, and % - 5 gallon. 4.':_ A minimum of inch box or larger. % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24- / / / / 5. W~thin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of on 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slopes in 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erdsion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. SC. 3/96 5 10. 11. 13. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. Completion Date / / For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material · shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. / / Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation Development Code and/or be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. shall be required per the This requirement shall / / The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. / / Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along / / 14. 15. V/ 2. .3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. A.:ny signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. / / / / / / / / SC - 3/96 Completion Date Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. / / The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior-to-accepting a cash deposit on any property. / / The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. / / Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ , prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. H. Other Agencies ,Jl. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. :.Fdr projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. / / / / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) '~'OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 477-2710, FOR SC - 7 The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Completion Date / / Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may-include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee,-Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. / / go Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. Existin~Structures Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances vJ 4. considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. / / / / / / / / / / K. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. ,A ¢eological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 5. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. SC - 3/9~ 8 Completion Date Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over / / adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issaance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis). e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): total feet on total feet An irrevocable offer of dedication for a for all private streets or drives. -foot wide roadway easement shall be made 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or be deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. / / / / / / / / / SC - 3]96 9 Completion Date Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated / / or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: / / "IAA/e hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. / I Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. / / 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City ~o acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an !. appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developeds cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be con§tructed for all half-section streets. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail v" ¢ ¢ (-5) SC - 10 Coml~l~fion D~I~ SC - 3/-c6 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per S_TD. 304. (d) If so m.arked, an in-lieu__of construction fee shall be provided for this ite_m.(¢')¢'~.~2~r ~'_ ~c~.5."T'~,4.~ "'E'¢'d, ~ ff-'~:'~lr, t.,J ~."~ ~k/C - -- '- ¼L · -a . ' ~ L ' ,.3 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a registered City Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, / / / / I I I I I I I I Completion Date fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's'Office in addition to any other permits required. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in __/__/__ accordance with the City's street tree program. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with __/__/ adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, / / including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by __/__/__ moving the 2+/-closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: __/__/__ 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: / / N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. - A -elaarate set of land3capc and irrigation plans pur Fl~glneering Public Wu~ k~ St,ui.dards shall-' -be submitted to thc City Engineer for review and approval p[io~ tu r;.al ,nap approval or' issuancc of building permits, wh;~.h~v~r o~.cul~ l~t. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas are required to be annexed into the ! Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. Parkway .landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective B..ea~tification Master Plan: / / O, Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer~ ~- 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all SC - 3196 12 necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. Completion Date 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted tcrand approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. / / / / 5. .-Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the. outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. / / / / / / Q. General!Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. / / 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: / / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District a ,.mdng the newly created parcels. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: / / / / / / SC .- 3196 13 Completion Date A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community __/ / Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure sbcondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2780, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. General Fire Protection Conditions Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. gallons per minute, A previous fire flow conducted revealed gpm available at 20 psi. Fire flow requirement shall be ,.~ O¢ O a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is ' available~ pending completion of required fire protection system. H~,drant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ~PPer Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. , Other / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 14 Completion Date Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of sprinkler system. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: r Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. JOther b,..)'~:~/~ IO[ ~ \Cjcjq (.,(¢(_., ~/'10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: ,,/~AII roadways. ~'/11. 12. 13. ~/J 15. / / 17. / / / / / / / / 18. Other Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: __Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other A Khox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall b~ submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for the proper form letter. / / / / / / / $C - 3196 15 ___// 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $ $ ~ ~' f shall be paid: ~Prior to water plan approval. ~Prior to final plan approval. - have been paid. Completion Date An additional Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. S. Special Permits __.~///1. Spec~J.~ermits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: __a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. b. Storage of readily combustible material. c. Places of assembly (except churches, schools, and other non-profit organizations). d. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. e. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). f. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. __g. Garages. Motor vehicle repair (H-4). ; __h. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet). __i. Tire rebuilding plants. __j. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants. k. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanks, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual component .... coatings (per spray booth). Magnesium (more than 10 pounds per day). Oil burning equipment operations. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounds of refrigerant). Compressed gases (storage, handling or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). SC - 3/96 / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / __.q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling, or use). r. Dust-producing processes and equipment. s. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling, or use). t. High piled combustible stock. - u. -Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, transpod, or use exceeding more than 120 gallons). v. Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross). w. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy. Project is located in a high fire hazard area and is subject to special wildland/urban interface hazard mitigation requirements. Such requirements may include requirements related to vegetation management plans, special construction enhancements, emergency access, water supply, automatic fire extinguishing systems, and other special requirements. Contact the Fire/Building Safety New Construction Unit for information. Proiect NO. ~. ~ q~' ~ Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH -HE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. U. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. Onb-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are w~thin 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 4. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. Security Fencing / / / / / / / SC - 3/0~5 17 Completion Date When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used / / since fire and law enforcement can access these devices. W. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. / / ---- 2. Store-front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / / X. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. / / At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Plannin9 Division. / / 4. All developments shall submit a 8 1/2" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department. / / Y. Alarm Systems 1.L Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. / / SC - 3/96 18 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 96-03 FOR HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND ALMOND STREETS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-281-16 A. Recitals. 1. San Bernardino Associated Governments has filed an application for the Design Review of a new residence on a 5.54 acre site, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 24, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission he;'eby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not will b~ detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. a) Compliance with all applicable conditions of Landmark Alteration 96-01, and Conditional Use Permit 96-09. (See Conditional Use Permit 96-09 for all applicable standard conditions.) 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-03 - SANBAG April 24, 1996 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ' E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of April 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS