Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/01/12 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION it AGENDA TUESDAY January 12, 1991 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC OTTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACTION AGENDA 5:00 P.M. I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner x vice-Chair Haskvitz x Chairman Banks x Commissioner Schmidt x Commissioner Billings x Commissioner Tessier x Commissioner Cooper A Approved 6-0-1 III• Approval of Minutes December 8, 1992 Iv. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Recommend to Council A. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-01 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 93-01 - approval of Landmark JAN SUTTON AND DALE SUTTON - An application to designate the Designation 93-01 Emory Allen House, located at 9441 Lomita Avenue, as a local 6-0--1 Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a and Mills Act Contract for the said property. APN: Mills Act Contract 93-01 202-082-13• This action will be forwarded to the City 6-0--1 Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. Recommend to Council B. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-03 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 92-02 - approval of Landmark VANESSA AND WAYNE SMITH - An application to designate the Designation 93-03 Hoppe House, located at 6155 East Avenue, as a local 6-0-1 Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a and Mills Act Contract for the said property - APN: 225-191-16. Mills Act Contract 92-02 This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final 6-0--1 action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. Continued to 2-9-93 C. DEMOLITION REVIEW AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-02 OR POINT OF 6-0-1 HISTORIC INTEREST 93-01 - NORA CHAO/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to demolish the Etiwanda Auto Repair, a potential local landmark, located at 12906 Base Line Road, and a proposal to either reevaluate the potential significance of the structure or designate it as a local Landmark or Point of Historic Interest - APN: 227-131-17. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. V. Old Business Update Given D. UPDATE ON PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE - ORAL REPORT VI. New Business VII. Commission Business VIII. Announcements I%. Public Comments 6:05 P.M. X. Adjournment AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: DEMOLITION REVIEW AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-02 OR POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 93-01 - NORA CHAO/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to demolish the Etiwanda Auto Repair, a potential local landmark, located at 12906 Base Line Road, and a proposal to either reevaluate the potential significance of the structure or designate it as a local Landmark or Point of Historic Interest - APN: 227-131-17. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. I, Shelley Petrelli, declare as follows: That I am the Historic Preservation Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on January 12, 1993, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE attached hereto; and that on January 13, 1993, at the hour of 11 :00 a.m. , a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 13, 1993 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Shelley Petrel Historic Preservation Commission Secretary CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on January 12, 1993, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on February 9, 1993. DEMOLITION REVIEW AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-02 OR POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 93-01 - NORA CHAO/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to demolish the Etiwanda Auto Repair, a potential local landmark, located at 12906 Base Line Road, and a proposal to either reevaluate the potential significance of the structure or designate it as a local Landmark or Point of Historic Interest - APN: 227-131-17. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. The meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. , in the Council Chamber of the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER Noes: NONE Absent: COOPER Abstain: NONE January 13, 1993 Date Shelley Petr i Historic Pres rvation Commission Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION i$ AGENDA TUESDAY January 12, 199 5:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance - r \ II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner Vice-Chair Haskvitz �Y Chairman Banks Commissioner Schmidt 1/ Commissioner Billings Commissioner Tessier 4" Commissioner Cooper III. Approval of Minutes --� December 8, 1992 Iv. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. c� ��.v,d r ouo� A. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-01 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 93-01 - JAN SUTTON AND DALE SUTTON - An application to designate the Emory Allen House, located at 9441 Lomita Avenue, as a local Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a 0 Mills Act Contract for the said property. APN: b — 202-082-13. This action will be forwarded to the City \ N S Q Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing a 3 01 before City Council will be separately noticed. Cbv G- O 1 B. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-03 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 93-02 - VANESSA AND WAYNE SMITH - An application to designate the Hoppe House, located at 6155 East Avenue, as a local Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a j Mills Act Contract for the said property - APN: 225-191-16• This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. C. DEMOLITION REVIEW AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-02 OR POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 93-01 - NORA CHAO/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A proposal to demolish the Etiwanda Auto Repair, a C tip ` -o potential local landmark, located at 12906 Base Line Road, and a proposal to either reevaluate the potential significance of the structure or designate it as a local Landmark or Point of Historic Interest - APN: 227-131-17. U This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. V. Old Business G'\Q D. UPDATE ON PEARSON FILLING STATION AND GARAGE - ORAL REPORT VI. New Business VII. Commission Business VIII. Announcements I%• Public Comments J U P X. Adjournment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting December 8, 1992 Chairman Marsha Banks called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Banks then led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Melicent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gene Billings (arrived at 5:08 PM) , Ada Cooper, Alan Haskvitz, Bob Schmidt (arrived at 5:05 PM) , Anne Tessier COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Shelley Petrelli, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Tessier, carried 5-0-2, to approve the November 10, 1992 minutes. OLD BUSINESS ---A.---STATUS UPDATE ON THE PEARSON GARAGE AND FILLING STATION - Oral Report Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated that the Council staff report contains a cost analysis for relocating the building and the fact that staff has not heard from the State Historic Preservation Officer. He further stated that the Public Works subcommittee (which includes two Council members) has met twice to discuss the project and has not come to a conclusion regarding the improvements for the intersection. He further commented that the committee will be recommending to the City Engineer that the item be continued for another 30 days until they hear from the State Historic Preservation Officer. Mr. Henderson stated that the traffic signal on the northwest corner will not be placed in its ultimate location at this time because the property owner does not wish to dedicate his property for the needed right-of-way. Chairman Banks asked if Council still wanted the traffic signal placed on the northeast corner in its ultimate location. HPC MINUTES -1- December 8, 1992 Mr. Henderson stated that traffic signal placement is undetermined at this point but he will keep the Commission informed about any further developments. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 92-01 - H. W. MINOR RESIDENCE - A proposal to designate the H. W. Minor residence, located at 10304 19th Street, as a local Point of Historic Interest - APN 1076-141-01. Related file: Tentative Tract 15531. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Banks commented that the Commission was pleased with the work Hix Development did on the Lord house and that they were looking forward to working with the developer on this project. She stated that the project had been discussed at the Commission's last meeting, including discussion about the perimeter fencing. She questioned if the perimeter fencing and the plaque/monument could be combined with the corner pilaster because there is not a great deal of room on the property for both. Mr. Hayes replied that something like that could be done. Commissioner Haskvitz suggested a design similar to the Schowalter rock pile plaque that is mounted on a rock pilaster. Chairman Banks stated she thought it could be similar to that design. She further commented that she felt comfortable with staff reviewing the plans for the garage without coming back to the Commission. The Commission concurred. Chairman Banks opened the public hearing. Bob Yoder, Hix Development, 437 So. Cataract, San Dimas, stated he wished to clarify that the owners want a three-car garage so that is what Hix will be designing for them. Millard Herr, owner of the house, 10304 19th, stated the house has aluminum siding instead of wood and any attempts to alter it would prove difficult because the old siding underneath is in bad shape. He commented that the garage is the same original architecture as the house. He said he is interested in restoring the front porch which he didn't think would be too difficult because the interior of the porch is still in its original state. Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tessier asked for clarification regarding where future freeway access would be in relation to the project. Mr. Hayes responded that a sound attenuation wall would be constructed close to the area in question but there would be no freeway access there. MOTION: Moved by Billings, seconded by Cooper, carried unanimously 7-0-0, recommending approval of historic Point of Interest 92-01, the H. W. Minor house, including recommendations made by staff. HPC MINUTES -2- December 8, 1992 Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, TESSIER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried ANNOUNCEMENTS Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, updated the Commission on the following projects: 1. Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) is in escrow for the purchase of the China House. The project is on the CCWD agenda next week. 2. Alta Loma Packing House project is still on hold. Staff is trying to move the residential housing portion of the project along in the meantime. 3. The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) has conceptually approved the purchase of the Regina/Ellena Winery which could possibly be used for senior housing or a mixed use project. 4. The Gilbert House should be on the next agenda for final determination of its status for the HPC Historic List. 5. Rehabilitation at the Ledig house is progressing on a timely basis. The house will be placed on the ground when the weather clears up. 6. Rehabilitation at Chaf fey-Garcia house is moving along and the contractor's portion should be finished by January 1993. 7. The Stoebe property is out of probate and there should be no reason why clean up and restoration of the house cannot begin now. Code Enforcement has been given the go ahead to issue citations on property if the property owner does not start cleaning it up. Commissioner Tessier asked if anything had been done regarding the HPC newsletter for historic property owners. Mr. Henderson stated that the Commission decided at their last meeting that Chairman Banks and Commissioner Arner would work on the development of that item. Chairman Banks stated she and Commissioner Arner would be working on that project in the future. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no further public comments. HPC MINUTES -3- December 8, 1992 ADJOURNMENT The Historic Preservation Commission adjourned at 5:32 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Shelley A. Petrelli HPC MINUTES -4- December 8, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r= DATE: January 12, 1993 - TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commissio FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-01 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 93-01 - JAN SUTTON AND DALE SUTTON - An application to designate the Emory Allen House, located at 9441 Lomita Avenue, as a local Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a Mills Act Contract for the said property. APN: 202-082-14. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: Sisters Jan and Dale Sutton purchased the Emory Allen House in the historic core of the Alta Loma community in December of 1992. The Commission reviewed the structure in October 1991 as part of the Old Alta Loma Survey and rated it as a potential local landmark. Jan Sutton had many conversations with staff prior to and during the purchase of the home regarding the possibility of applying for a landmark designation and restoring the building. Although altered, most of the modifications are reversible and the Suttons are excited and committed to preserving and restoring their new home. Based upon meetings with Ms. Sutton, site visits to the historic home, and a careful review of the proposed improvements for the property, staff finds that approving their request for a Mills Act contract meets objectives of providing incentives for owners interested in the long- term preservation of our cultural resources. The attached contract, Exhibit "HPC-1," especially Exhibit "C" therein contains the list of improvements proposed by the Suttons. After review by the Commission, a recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council and is tentatively scheduled for the agenda on February 17, 1993. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Location and Description: Situated on the southwest corner of the intersection of Lomita Drive and Layton Court, the site is relatively flat and dotted with a number of mature trees. The parcel is just over one-quarter of an acre in size, please refer to Exhibit "HPC-2," Site Map. Site Land Use, Zoning, General Plan Designations: Low density residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) zoning is overlaid on the site per the General Plan. Z.t,✓w, A HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-01 - SUTTON January 12, 1993 Page 2 Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, General Plan/Specific Plan Designations: The land to the immediate north, south, east, and west is also zoned for Low density residential use, although the property lies on the residential edge of the commercially zoned business district of Alta Loma around the intersection of Amethyst Avenue and Base Line Road. Physical Description (Please refer to Exhibit "HPC-3" for Survey Form) : This roughly square-shaped, two-storied structure of wood-framed construction is supported by a field-stone wall foundation. Currently covered with stained wood shingles, the original 6-inch wood siding still exists underneath this added layer. The medium-pitched, front gabled roof is mirrored in the construction of the front, east facing porch which is supported by unadorned piers atop an extended field stone wall. From Assessor's records, it appears that in 1940, Mr. Allen expanded the interior of the downstairs kitchen area into the southern portion of the front porch, constructing the new walls from bricks made with his own hands. The owner previous to the Suttons replaced the wooden windows in the kitchen area with aluminum sliding windows and added a layer of stucco to the brick building faces. Likewise, the walls of the enclosed rear (west) porch that Mr. Allen built of brick and were stuccoed by the same owner. To the south of the house lies a structure probably used originally as a stable and garage. This single storied building has a steeply-pitched, front-gabled roof that allows for an airy interior loft accessible by an exterior hay door located in the center of the east-facing pediment formed by the gabled roof lines. Other features worthy of note include a stone-floored patio between the southeast corner of the house and the garage/barn and accessed from the kitchen door. ANALYSIS: Historical Background: This structure was built shortly after the peak of citrus development in the Alta Loma area and when the town was a thriving, if small, town. Surrounded by many ranches, most of them citrus, the town's packing houses were busy and attracted more and more workers who built more homes, schools, and later community buildings like the Fire Hall. Emory Allen constructed the home for his family in 1933 and expanded it as his family grew. He had a very impressive record with the local residents as a handy man extraordinaire. Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy recalls Emory Allen as the most sensical yet creative repair and construction craftsman he knew. Mr. Allen worked for the Cucamonga County Water District after its creation and as the Allen family grew they became an integral part of community life. Significance: Historical, Cultural, and Architectural - As part of the historic residential core of the Alta Loma community, and with its proximity to the small business district, the Emory Allen house stands a firm reminder of life in the area during the Depression years. Of straightforward styling and construction, the home represents the dedication of men and women who built a life in this rural area. A - 7 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-01 - SUTTON January 12, 1993 Page 3 The Allen home represents an example of an owner who acted as a builder and from all available accounts as an architect as well of his own home. The architectural integrity of the Allen house has decidedly suffered from recent alterations which detract from its original appearance. However, the basic form and shape of the structure, beyond Mr. Allen's own additions, has not changed. Issues: Due to the enthusiasm displayed by the Sutton sisters to rehabilitate and restore the house as close to its c. 1934-1940 appearance as possible, and that they are applying for a property tax reduction with a Mills Act contract, staff feels comfortable in recommending the Allen House for designation as an Historical Landmark. Because the contract specifically grants the City powers to review and if necessary revoke the contract if the applicant fails to perform the mutually agreed upon restoration work, and that the Sutton sisters plan a full restoration over the next ten years, staff believes that their Landmark and Mills Act contract applications merit approval. Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15308. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Per Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the following findings are made in support of this designation application: Historic and Cultural Significance: Finding: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: The Emory Allen home exemplifies the architecturally simple lines and craftsmanship of the region's vernacular housing stock from the 1930s. In the context of the growing Alta Loma community, Emory Allen's handiwork, diligence, and craftsmanship (including the making of his own bricks) in building a home for his family, serve as fine examples of the sense of community and family spirit of the community. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: The proposed landmark in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact: For almost sixty years, the Emory Allen house has stood at the corner of Layton and Lomita Streets as an integral part of the physical fabric of the historic Alta Loma community. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to the adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. - 3 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-01 - SUTTON January 12, 1993 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the Commission should recommend to the City Council that the Emory Allen House be designated as a local Landmark by adopting the attached Resolution and that through minute action the Commission recommend that the City Council approve the request for a Mills Act property agreement and contract with the City for the property. Respectfully submitted, Larry J. Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AMH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Mills Act Contract (draft) Exhibit "HPC-2" - Site Map Exhibit "HPC-3" - State Survey Form Resolution of Approval RECORDING REQUESTED BY and when RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGPMMGMT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 17th day of February 1993, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Jan Sutton and Dale Sutton (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner") . W I T N E S S E T H A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorize cities to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance; -1- A _ S max"MIT HfIC-1 (ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property, together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as the Emory Allen House and generally located at the street address 9441 Lomita Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property") . A legal description of the Historic Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference; (iii) On February 17, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. * thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and, (iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 17, 1993, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten ( 10) years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2, below. 2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of -2- A - � nonrenewal is mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or City desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the Agreement. Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by City to Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one ( 1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest of the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner of nonrenewal. If either City or Owner serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions: a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B", and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement. b. Owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "C". C. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by -3- A - -� representatives of the County Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary to determine owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Provision of Information of Corporation. owner hereby agrees to furnish City with any and all information requested by the City which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. , may cancel this Agreement if it determines that owner breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. In the event of cancellation, Owner may be subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner) , then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically -4- A - 9 enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereinunder. 7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the -5- 1 Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner. B. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: City Planner To Owner: Jan Sutton & Dale Sutton 9441 Lomita Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 9. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of owner's activities in connection with the Historic -6- A -- l D Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. C. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 10. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. -7- A- I I 11 . Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Dated: By: Owner Dated: By: Owner -S- la - 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this day of , 199*, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and , known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and said persons are known to me to be the persons who execute the within instrument on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -9- a - �3 Notary Public in and for said State -10- A - Iq STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State -11- LEGAL DESCRIPTION for 9441 Lomita Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 TR 2190 LOMITA HEIGHTS W 47 FT N 121.99 FT LOT 16 AND N 121.99 FT LOT 15. EXHIBIT 'A' TSE SBCRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS I. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its original intended purpose. II. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. III. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. IV. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. V. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity. VI. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. VII. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. VIII. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction project. IX. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. X. Wherever possible new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. A- ri EXHIBIT 'B" PROPERTY PHLINTENANCE Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: 1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; 3. Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items; 4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas; 5. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location. EXHIBIT 'B-1' o Y Or kANCH0 CU�.,M� I''Lr,N,',DING D!ViS!O DEC 151992 POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS - "` PM "Mills Act"Agreement j4p' '1441 Gvvv%ii M A%Ftvune Ravtcko C U%*w�A, G+4 a 1701 Planned Restoration: LANDSCAPING: General goals are to relandscape yard and add such elements of design as will be appropriate for a 1930's farmhouse. Where possible, plant materials will be of types available at time of original construction, or reasonable facsimiles thereof. Design elements will be structured as to blend into style of home. 1. 1 Establish major trees/shrubs of type suitable for period. 2. 2 Begin planting orchard trees of type suitable for period. 3. 3 Begin establishment of Heritage Rose and vegetable garden areas suitable for period. 4. 4-5 Continue development of garden areas. 5. 6 Build small gazebo in a style compatible with house. 6. 7-8 Replace perimeter fencing with wood picket fencing. 7. 9-10 Build stone/wood entry arbors for east and north gateways in style suitable for home. STRUCTURE: General goals are to rehabilitate and restore as much of the original materials on the house as possible,or to repair and replace with reasonable facsimiles if original materials are beyond recovery. House Exterior 1= YCK T& 1. 1 Remove aluminum framed screens from the front porch and rescreen using the original wooden frames and install a wooden porch screen door. 2. 2 Remove aluminum window screens and replace with wood framed screens as originally used 3. 2 Remove window air conditioner in upstairs bedroom window. 4. 3 Remove roof t.v.antenna,and underground cable t.v.line. 5. 4 Repair window casements around house. 6. 4 Put loose wiring on south side of house into conduit compatible with conduit on north side. 7. 5 Replace bubble skylight in kitchen with more appropriate and less obtrusive design. 8. 6 Remove cedar shingles from original wood siding,and either rehabilitate original siding or replace with compatible siding. House Exterior(Continued) 11a1m Yom[ T A 9. 6 Replace aluminum sliding windows with wooden framed sash windows to match original window design. 10. 7 Remove stucco and restore original brick where possible. 11. 7 Remove wall air conditioner unit. 12. 8 Cover stucco on garage with material compatible with house. 13. 8 Paint exterior of house and garage. 14. 9 Remove poorly constructed stone wall extension and back patio area and replace with compatible stone work. 15. 10 Renovate interior of garage,work mom,and loft. House Interior 11M YM TAA 1. 1 Remove carpeting,sand and refinish hardwood floors. 2. 2 Replace modern hardware(switchplates,doorknobs,handles,etc.)with antique or replica pieces. 3. 3 Replace broken weights in windows. 4. 3 Remove acoustical ceiling. 5. 4 Restore plaster to ceiling and wall areas as needed. 6. 5 Replace kitchen cabinets with style appropriate for period 7. 9 Remodel bathrooms to style appropriate for period of house. A - -LO I I I I I� it I u I OPPQ II •— u ow ow I ' • -- y I . I I I x uie.s ■ I 8 � LORA I F•Tx uPIP s. I x ats I � I � x t . Px uea.a a ow x I , c Mout �u,��l ITEM: •�• °I3"O� Ci it nga on TITLE: EXHIBIT: -SCALE: K 12. A - 2-- 1 H P c - 2 Sate of California–The Resources Agencv Ser. No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HABS HAER Loc SHL No. __NR Status UTM: A C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY B D IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: Emory Allen 2. Historic name:—Emory Allen House 3. Street or rural address: 9441 Lomita Drive City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 County San Bernardino 4. Parcel number: 202-082-13 5. Present Owner: Jan Sutton and Dale Sutton Address: 9441 Lomita Drive City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91� 730 _Ownership is: Public _Private X 6. Present Use: Residence Original use: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Vernacular bungalow 7b. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: This roughly square-shaped, two-storied structure of wood-framed construction is supported by a field-stone wall foundation. Currently covered with stained wood shingles, the original 6-inch wood siding still exists underneath this added layer. The medium-pitched, front-gable roof is mirrored in the construction of the front east facing porch which is supported by unadorned piers atop an extended field, stone wall. From Assessor's records, it Appears that in 1940, Mr. Allen expanded the interior of the downstairs kitchen area into the southern portion of the front porch, constructing the new walls from bricks made with his own hands. The owner previous to the Suttons replaced the wooden windows in the kitchen area with aluminium sliding windows and added a layer of stucco to the brick building faces. Likewise, the walls of the enclosed rear (west) porch Mr. Allen built of brick were stuccoed by the same owner. To the south of the house lies a structure probably used originally as a stable and garage. This single-storied building has a steeply pitched, front-gabled roof that allows for an airy interior loft accessible by an exterior hay door (cont) Attach Photo Envelope Hero S. Construction date: Estimated 19v�-4 Factual 9. Architect Emory Allen 10. Builder Emory Allen. 11. Approx. property size (in feet) Frontage Depth or approx. acreage. 1/4 acre 12. Date(s) of enclosed photogr, 1 bigt DPR 523 (Rev. 11/85) 2 2 13. Condition: Excellent ,Good Fair X Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: Stucco over brick wainscoat; enclosure of front _and rear porches 5. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land X Scattered buildings x Densely built-up Residential X Industrial Commercial Other: 16. Threats to site: None known X Private development Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: 17. Is the structure: On its original site? Yes Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: - Garage/Barn SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) This structure was built shortly after the peak of citrus development in the Alta Loma area and when the town was a thriving, if small, town. Surrounded by many ranches, most of them citrus, the town's packing houses were busy and attracted more and more workers who built more homes, schools, and later community buildings like the Fire- Hall. Emory Allen constructed the home for his family in 1933 and expanded it as his family grew, as he had a very impressive record with the local residents as a handy man extraordinaire. Peter Tolstoy recalls Emory Allen as the most sensical yet creative repair and construction craftsman he knew. Mr. Allen worked for the Cucamonga County Water District after its creation and as the Allen family grew they became an integral part of community life. As part of the historic residential core of the Alta Loma community, and with its proximity to the small business district, the Emory Allen house stands as a firm reminder of life in the area during the Depression years. Of straightforward styling and construction, the home represents the dedication of men and women who built a life in this rural area. (cont) Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is NORTH checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture Arts& Leisure Economic/Industrial —Exploration/Settlement Government Military Religion Social/Education X 21. Sources (List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews U and their dates). History of Alta Loma, Martha Stoebe, 1981; Interview with Peter Tolsto (28 December 1992) F- 9 22. Date form prepared 29 December 1992 By (name) Anthea Hartig Organization City of Rancho Cucamonga Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 Phone: (909) 989-1861 8 I.t N � - 23 MASTER FILE HISTORIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING SHEET NOTE: The numbers in parentheses indicate either the number of characters(letters,numbers,punctuation marks,spaces) that may be entered or the number of lines that may be checked. 1. Ser. No. 1701 — — 10. Registration Status (1): City Zip (4) Form No. (1-4) Prop. No. (0-4) —1) listed —date (6)//_4) may become eligible _2) determined eligible — _5) eligible local listing USGS Quad Map No. (4) year (2) _6) ineligible for above 2. UTM Zone (2) Easting (6) Northing (7) _3) appears eligible _.7) undetermined A 11. Property Given Registration Status as (1): B C _1} part of district D _2) individual property _3) both of above 3. Property Name: Common Name (30): 12. NR Class Category (1): Emory Allen House —1) district —No. of properties (0-3) Historic Name (40): _2) site Emory Allen House X.3) building Parcel No, (0.17) 0202-082-13 _4) structure `5) object 4. Address: 9441 Lomita Drive 13. Other Registration (0-9) Number 0-5) Street Name (4-20) _1)Historic Am. Big. Survey _6) Cal. Historical Landmark Layton _2) Historic Am. Eng. Rec. _7) County Pt of Hist Interest Nearest Cross Street (0-20) —3) National Hist Landmark XB) Local Listing uanchn r imamnnga _4) State Historic Park _9) County/Regional Park City/Town (3-20) _5) other 91701 Vicinity of. Zip code (5) City/Town 14. Property Attributes: County 3-letter designator(3) SRn _1) unknown ___22) lake/river/reservoir —�L2) sing, family prop. _23) ship S. Type of Ownership (1.7): _3) mule family prop. —24) lighthouse _4)ancillary big, _75) amusement park 1) unknown --L4) private _5) hotel/motel _26) monument/mural/gravestone _ 2) federal 5) county _6) comm, big. 1.3 st _27) folk art _3) state 6) city _7) comm. big. over 3 st _28) street furniture 7) special district _ 8) industrial big. _29) landscape architr. _ 9) public utility big. _30) trees/vegetation 6. Present Use (1-6): _10) theatre __31) urban open space _11) engineering struct. X32) rural open space ,_1) unknown 4) private non-comm. _12) civic auditorium _33) farm/ranch 2) commercial _5) public _13) cmnty cntr/soc. hall —34) military property X 3) residential 6) none _14) govemment big. _35) CCC/WPA structure _15) educational big. _36) ethnic minority property 7. Year of Initial Construction: _16) religious big. ethnic group (5-20) 1933 —17) R/R depot Individual Property (4) _18) train —37) highway/trail District (8) — _19) bridge _38) women's property —.20) canal/aqueduct --A0) cemetery 8. Architect(s) (0-25): _21) dam _39) other Emory Allen Builder(s)(0-25): 15. Architectural Plans Emory Allen and Specifications: Yes R No 9. Year of Survey (2): 1992 DPR 660 (Rev. 12/83) � � 2 HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 7b. located in the center of the east-facing pedement formed by an exterior hay door located in the center of the east-facing pedement formed by the gabled roof lines. Other features worthy of note include a stone-floored patio between the southeast corner of the house and the garage/barn and accessed from the kitchen door. 19. The Allen home represents an example of an owner who acted as a builder and from all available accounts as an architect as well on his own home. The architectural integrity of the Allen House has decidedly suffered from recent alterations which detract from its original appearance. However, the basic form and shape of the structure, beyond Mr. Allen's own additions, has not changed. 1 • ' • • 1 • s AMW ._s 1 � l .4 . _� k• � ��;�� �;. `�., �` _`.rte •• � . Ti *Tr,,l Ed • t' s r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 93-01 TO DESIGNATE THE EMORY ALLEN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9441 LOMITA DRIVE, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 202-082-13 A. Recitals. (i) Jan Sutton and Dale Sutton have filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 12, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately one-quarter acre of land, basically a square configuration, located at the southwest corner of Layton Court and Lomita Drive. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 12, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Facts: The Emory Allen home exemplifies the architecturally simple lines and craftsmanship of the region's vernacular housing stock from the 1930s. In the contest of the growing Alta Loma community, Emory Allen's handiwork, diligence, and craftsmanship (including the making of his own bricks) in building a home for his family, serve as fine examples of the sense of community and family spirit of the community. A - 28 HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 93-01 - SUTTON January 12, 1993 Page 2 B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. Finding 1: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Facts: For almost sixty years, the Emory Allen house has stood at the corner of Layton Court and Lomita Street as an integral part of the physical fabric of the historic Alta Loma community. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970• 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of January 1993, of Landmark Designation 93-01. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993• Marsha Meek Banks, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT = DATE: January 12, 1993 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-03 AND MILLS ACT CONTRACT 93-02 - VANESSA AND WAYNE SMITH - A proposal to designate the Hoppe House, located at 6155 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as a local Landmark. In addition, review of a request to enter into a Mills Act Contract for the said property. APN: 225-191-16. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Husband and wife Wayne and Vanessa Smith, purchased the Hoppe House in the Etiwanda community in June of 1992, after searching specifically for a historic home in Rancho Cucamonga. The Commission reviewed the structure in 1987 as part of the City's survey and rated it as a potential local landmark. Vanessa Smith had many conversations with staff prior to and during the purchase of the home regarding the possibility of applying for a landmark designation and restoring the building. The home stands as an excellent example of a rural ranch home for a large Etiwanda family and the Smiths have already begun to rehabilitate their new home. Upon meetings with Ms. Smith, site visits to the historic home, and a careful review of the proposed improvements for the property, staff believes that approving their request for a Mills Act contract meets our objectives of providing incentives for owners interested in the long- term preservation of our cultural resources. The attached contract, Exhibit "HPC-1," especially Exhibit "C" therein, lists the improvements proposed by the Smiths. After review by the Commission, the application will be forwarded to the City Council tentatively scheduled for the agenda on February 17, 1993. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Location and Description: Situated on the east side of East Avenue just south of Summit Avenue, the site is relatively flat and dotted with a number of mature trees. The parcel is one-half acre in size (please refer to Exhibit "HPC-2," Site Map) . Site Land Use, zoning, General Plan, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Designations: Very Low Residential (less than two dwelling units per acre) zoning is overlaid on the site per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 2 Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, General Plan/Specific Plan Designations: The land to the immediate north, south, east, and west is also zoned for Very Low Residential use. Physical Description (Please refer to Exhibit "HPC-3" for Survey Form) : This rectangular, two-storied structure of wood-framed construction is supported by a raised field-stone wall foundation of which a full basement is also constructed. The medium-pitched, cross- gabled roof allows for a double, west-facing porch which is supported by unadorned piers atop an extended field-stone wall. The intersecting gable roof covers a one-bay extension on the north and south sides of the home. Along the southern side, a lower-story bay window protrudes allowing for extra light into the dining room area and providing exterior architectural variety. The roof is covered now with grey composition shingles. The roof line extends to the first floor level and the broad pediment molding exhibits slightly flared return treatments at both eave intersections. An interior fireplace of brick construction extends its chimney along the internal joining of the south side's cross-gabled dormer wing. Porches on both the ground and upper levels accentuated the front (west) facade of the home. The molding treatment and the broad, overhanging eaves of the roof are mirrored in the design of the lower-story's covered porch. From the upper story, a five-panelled door provides access to the open porch, the floor of which serves as the porch's roof. A 3-foot high wooden balustrade encircles this upstairs porch. The supporting walls of the porch unit are of field stone construction, laid in the same manner as those in the foundation walls. Four unadorned piers with slightly flared bases and capitals support the porch roof. The current owners have added a circa 1890 decorative wooden lattice scroll to the porch that lies under the cornice molding and in between the piers and a similar treatment to the pedimental triangle between the eaves of the front gable. Beveled, three-inch, lap siding covers the house's exterior. The window and door surrounds are all simply worked as are the surrounds of the latticed attic vents tucked just under the front and rear gabled roof ridges. Other decorative treatments include two broad cornice bands wrapped around the west, north, and south elevations. This cornice treatment returns and stops when it arrives at the rear (east) elevation. Wood-framed steps provide access to the rear of the home. The fenestration patter of the home responds to interior spatial needs rather than to any exterior demands for symmetry. Most of the windows are of a standard double-hung, one-over-one paned variety, except for the two front (west) windows and the center portion of the south bay window cluster; these three lights have a fixed paned upper panel in a diamond pattern. Very few additions have jeopardized the structure's architectural integrity since its construction in 1912. The home was used as a boarding house after the Hoppe family children grew up and moved out of — Z HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 3 the home. It was for this use that a rear staircase, landing, and upstairs entrance was added. The stairs have since rotted away and have been removed, leaving the landing and its supporting members remaining. Two out-buildings mimic, in construction and detail, the house. The single-storied garage, lying to the east of the structure, has a modern, metal, retracting door and is covered with 3-inch wood siding. A single-storied storage room lies to the east of the house, adjacent to the kitchen. Significance: A. Historical, Cultural, and Architectural: The Hoppe family has contributed to the development of this region since their 1898 arrival in Grapeland from Santa Monica. According to Robert Hickcox's History of Etiwanda, the Hoppes moved to Etiwanda from Grapeland in 1900 and acquired property at the southeast corner of Summit and East Avenues. After purchasing shares in the Etiwanda Water Company, the Hoppes planted grapes and apricots and established themselves in the young and growing Etiwanda community. After purchasing more land at the northeast corner of Summit and East Avenues, the family began planting lemon and orange trees and in 1912, began building their home at 6155 East Avenue. The Hoppes had first lived in a smaller four-room house that was full and lively with Mr. and Mrs. Hoppe and their five children. As the Hoppe offspring grew, some stayed in the Etiwanda community. Son George Hoppe planted one of the first commercial Christmas Tree Farm's on family land south of the original grove, according to Robert Hickcox. Flora Hoppe O'Kane lived in the home until it was purchased by the Smiths this year. Thus, the almost 100-year legacy of the Hoppe family in Etiwanda is commemorated in their well-preserved home. Architecturally, the home presents a simple, dignified presence and is one of the larger and finer residences of citrus ranchers in the Etiwanda area. Both on the interior and exterior, there is careful attention paid to detail and quality of craftsmanship. The broad over-hanging eaves complemented with decorative cornice and pediment molding lend to the structure a clean, defined appearance. Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are exempt under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15308. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Per Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the following findings are made in support of this designation application: rR - 3 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 4 A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Facts: The turn-of-the-century realities of the family-based, rural, agricultural lifestyle in the Etiwanda community are exemplified in the Hoppe House. Near to their acres of lemon, orange, and apricot groves, the home was removed geographically from the core of the Etiwanda town, but connected in many ways through economic, social, cultural, educational, and religious ties. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Facts: The number of grove houses, while never multitudinous, has decidedly declined as residential development has replaced agricultural production. Still relatively rural, the present-day setting of Hoppe House continues to reflect the past of Etiwanda. Finding 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality. Facts: The Hoppe family was an important and long-lived part of the community of Etiwanda. For almost 100 years, the family contributed to the social and economic history of the area. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Facts: The Hoppe House stands as a lasting reminder to the architectural styles of the agricultural communities of Southern California, circa 1915, and to the development of the Etiwanda community. It is an elegant yet functional element of the area's built environment. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Facts: For the past 81 years, the Hoppe House has stood as a testament to the early history of the community. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to the adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. 4 IR1 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission recommend to the City Council that the Hoppe House be designated as a local Landmark by resolution and that through minute action, recommend that the City Council approve the Smith's request for a Mills Act property agreement and contract for the property. Respectfully submitted, Larry J. Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AMH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Mills Act Contract (draft) Exhibit "HPC-2" - Site Map Exhibit "HPC-3" - State Survey Form Resolution of Approval 1-9 — J RECORDING REQUESTED BY and when RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGRMMW THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 17th day of February 1993, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Wayne and Vanessa Smith (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner") . W I T N E S S E T H A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorize cities to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance; -1- (ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property, together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as the Hoppe House and generally located at the street address 6155 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property"). A legal description of the Historic Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference; (iii) on February 17, 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. * thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and, (iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 17, 1993, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten ( 10) years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2, below. 2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date") , a year shall automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of -2- nonrenewal is mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or City desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the Agreement. Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by City to Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one ( 1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest of the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner of nonrenewal. If either City or Owner serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions: a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B", and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement. b. Owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "C". C. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by -3- 11-� - 6 representatives of the County Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary to determine owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Provision of Information of Corporation. Owner hereby agrees to furnish City with any and all information requested by the City which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. , may cancel this Agreement if it determines that Owner breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also cancel this Agreement if it determines that the owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. In the event of cancellation, Owner may be subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by owner) , then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically -4- enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereinunder. 7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the -5- d Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner. 8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: City Planner To Owner: Wayne and Vanessa Smith 6155 East Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 9. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of Owner's activities in connection with the Historic -6- r Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. C. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 10. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. -7- "-� - 12 11 . Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Dated: By: Owner Dated: By: Owner -8- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this day of , 199*, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and said persons are known to me to be the persons who execute the within instrument on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared , known to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -9- — ) 1 Notary Public in and for said State -10- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. FATNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State -11- LEGAL DESCRIPTION for 6155 East Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 THE WEST 190 FEET OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 400 FEET OF LOT 4, BLOCK "F" OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS EXHIBIT "A" THS SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS I. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its original intended purpose. II. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. III. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. IV. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. V. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity. VI. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. VII. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. VIII. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction project. IX. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. X. Wherever possible new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. EXHIBIT 'B' PROPEIRPY MAINTENANCE Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: 1 . Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; 3. Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items; 4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas; 5. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location. 1 Q EXHIBIT 'B-1' Q POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS f or 6155 East Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission's staff. ITEM YEAR TASK 1 . 1992 Exterior paint and restoration work. 2. 1993 Re-roof (House, Garage, Shed) ; Install new curtains. 3. 1994 Interior paint and wallpaper; tile flooring. 4. 1995 Upgrade front and rear landscaping; Insulate walls and ceiling of the residence. 5. 1996 Re-wire electrical system in house. 6. 1997 Retrofit for earthquake safety; re-porcelain 2 tubs. 7. 1998 Install two wood burning stoves. 8. 1999 Install new forced air conditioning and heat. 9. 2000 Re-finish hardwood floors; Replace garage door. 10. 2001 Exterior paint house, garage, and shed. � ' Ze x uto 9 n-. X t510 B X 1509 4 W b� P SU IT OPP W 1 a 0 O � o / ITEM: L •t�. �3-D3 t aga TITLE:_ N a EXHIBIT: -p2SCALE: LC State of California—The.Resources Agency Ser. No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HAGS HAER Loc SHL No. NR Status UTM: A C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY B D IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: Hoppe House 3. Street or rural address: 6155 East Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga =Zip 91739 County Gan Rernarr3 i nn 4. Parcel number: 225-191-16 5. Present Owner: Vanessa a .,1 Wayne Smith Address: 6155 East Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga _ Zip 91 719 Ownership is: Public ,_.Private x 6. Present Use: Residence Original use: Residen e DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Vernacular Bungalow 7b. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: This rectangular, two-storied structure of wood-framed construction is supported by a raised field-stone wall foundation of which a full basement is also constructed. The medium-pitched, cross-gabled roof allows for a double, west-facing porch which is supported by unadorned piers atop an extended field-stone wall. The inter- secting gable roof covers a one-bay extension on the north and south sides of the home. Along the southern side, a lower-story bay window protrudes allowing for extra light into the dining room area and exterior architectural variety. The roof is covered now with grey composition. The roof shingle line extend to the first floor ceiling height and the broad pediment molding exhibits slightly flared return treatments at both eave intersections. An interior fireplace of brick construction extends its chimney along the internal joining of the cross- gabled dormer wing. Porches on both the ground and upper levels accentuated the front (west) facade of the home. The molding treatment and the broad, over- hanging eaves of the roof are mirrored in the design of the lower-story' s covered porch. From the upper story, a five-panelled door provides access to the open porch, the floor of which serves as the porch' s roof. A 3-foot high wooden balustrade encircles this upstairs porch. (Con't. ) Attach Photo Envelope Here $. Construction date: 1912 l Estimated Factual (sex,G���d �=ta Jl 9. Architect unknown 10. Builder unknown 11. Approx.proPerty size lin feet) Frontage Depth or approx. acreage. 1/2 acre 12. Date(s) of enclosed photogrr DPR 523 (Rev. 11/85) 13. Condition: Excellent _Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations- rear (east) stairway on exterior; added second story doors; decorative bric-a-brac trip to fron facade (west) 5. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land X Scattered buildings X Densely built-up Residential X industrial Commercial Other: 16. Threats to site: None known X Private development Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: rarage- nnt-huildinQG SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) The Hoppe family has contributed to the development of this region since their 1898 arrival at Grapeland from Santa Monica. According to Robert Hickcox's History of Etiwanda, the Hoppe' s moved to Etiwanda from Grapeland in 1900 and acquired property at the southeast corner of Summit and East Avenues. After purchasing shares in the Etiwanda Water Company, the Hoppe's planted grape vines and apricots and established themselves in the young and growing Etiwanda community. After purchasing more land at the northeast corner of Summit and East Avenues, the family began planting lemon and orange trees and in 1912, began building the home at 6155 East Avenue. The Hoppe' s had first lived in a smaller four-room house that must have been crowded with Mr. and Mrs. Hoppe and their five children. As the Hoppe family offspring grew, some stayed in the Etiwanda community. George Hoppe planted one of the first commercial Christmas Tree Farm' s on family land south of the original grove, according to Robert Hickcox. Flora Hoppe O'Kane lived in the Hoppe home until it was purchased by the Smith's this year. Thus, the almost 100- year legacy of the Hoppe family in Etiwanda is commemorated in their well-preserved home. (Con't. ) Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (if more than one is NORTH checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture 2 Arts 6 Leisure Economic/industrial—Exploration/Settlement Government Military Religion Social/Education 21. Sources (List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews ''+ H ,f A and their dates). History of Etiwanda, Hickcox 1981 . Interviews with Marsha Banks and Vanessa Smith. V Z 22. Date form prepared 24 December 1992 By (name) Anthea Hartig rdf2 Organization City of Rancho Cucamonga Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 Phone: (909) 989-1861 -. _ .. .. _ - � ..... rte..... fliyi.r/'. i.,.• MASTER FILE HISTORIC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING SHEET NOTE: The numbers in parentheses indicate either the number of characters (letters,numbers,punctuation marks,spaces) that may be entered or the number of lines that may be checked. 1. Ser. No. i 71g - - 10. Registration Status (1): City Zip (4) Form No. (111) Prop. No. (011) _1) listed -date (6)//4) may become eligible _2) determined eligible - X_5)eligible local listing USGS Quad Map No. (4) year (2) _6) ineligible for above 2. UTM Zone (2) Easting (6) Northing (7) _3) appears eligible X 7) undetermined A 11. Property Given Registration Status as (1): B C _1) part of district D RC2) individual property _3) both of above 3. Property Name: Common Name (30): 12. NR Class Category (1): Hoppe House 1) district-No. of properties (0.3) Historic Name (40): _2) site Hoppe House v3) building _4) structure Parcel No, (0-17) 225-191-16 `5) obiect 4. Address: 13. Other Registration (0-9) 6155 East Avenue Number 0- ) Street Name (4-20) _1)Historic Am. Big. Survey _6) Cal. Historical Landmark _2) Historic Am. Eng. Rec. _7) County Pt of Hist Interest Nearest rose Street (0.20) _3) National Hist Landmark_$) Local Listing Rancho Cucamonga _4) State Historic Park _9) County/Regional Park City/Town (3-20) _5) other ai 7'AQ Vicinity of. Zip code (5) City/Town 14. Property Attributes: County 3-letter designator(3) SBD _1) unknown _22) lake/river/reservoir X 2) sing. family prop. —231 ship 5. Type of Ownership (1.7): —3) mutt family prop. 14) lighthouse _4)ancillary big, .__75) amusement park _1) unknown X 4) private _5) hotel/motel _26) monument/mural/gravestone 2) federal 5) county _6) comm. big. 1.3 st _27) folk art _3) state 6) city —7) comm. big. over 3 st. _28) street furniture 7) special district — 8) industrial big. _29) landscape architr. 9) public utility big. _30) trees/vegetation 6. Present Use (1-6): _10) theatre __,31) urban open space _11) engineering struct. '12) rural open space _1) unknown 4) private non-comm. _12) civic auditorium _33) farm/ranch 2) commercial —5) public _13) cmnty cntr/soc.hall —34) military property X 3) residential 6) none _14) government big. _35) CCC/WPA structure _15) educational big. _36) ethnic minority property 7. Year of Initial Construction: _16) religious big, ethnic group (5-20) .17) R/R depot Individual Property (4) 1912 _18) train —37) highway/trail District (8) - 19) bridge _38) women's property _.20) canal/aqueduct —AO) cemetery 8. Architect(s) (0-25): 11) dam —39) other ,mknown Builder(s)(0-25): 15. Architectural Plans unknown and Specifications: as X No 9. Year of Survey (2): 1987, 1992 DPR 660 (Rev. 12/83) _ HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 7b. The supporting walls of the porch unit are of field stone construction, laid in the same manner as those in the foundation walls. Four unadorned piers with slightly flared bases and capitals support the porch roof. The current owners have added a circa 1890 decorative wooden lattice scroll to the porch that lies under the cornice molding and in between the piers and a similar treatment to the pedimental triangle between the eaves of the front gable. Beveled three inches, lap siding covers the house's exterior. The window and door surrounds are all simply worked as are the surrounds of the latticed attic vents tucked just under the front and rear gabled roof ridge. Other decorative treatments include two broad cornice bands wrapped around the west, north, and south elevations. This cornice treatment returns and stops when it arrives at the rear (east) elevation. Wood-framed steps provide access to the rear of the home. The fenestration pattern of the home responds to interior spatial needs rather than to any exterior demands for symmetry. Most of the windows are of a standard double-hung, one-over-one paned variety, except for the two front (west) windows and the center portion of the south bay window cluster; these three lights have a fixed paned upper panel in a diamond pattern. Very few additions have jeopardized the structure's architectural integrity since its construction in 1912. The home was used as a boarding house after the Hoppe family grew up and moved out of the home. It was for this use that a rear staircase, landing, and upstairs entrance was added. The stairs have since rotted away and have been removed, leaving the landing and its supporting members remaining. Two out-buildings mimic, in construction and detail, the house. The single-storied garage, lying to the east of the structure, has a modern, metal, retracting door and is covered with 3-inch wood siding. 19. Architecturally, the home presents a simple, dignified presence and is one of the larger and finer residences of citrus ranchers in the Etiwanda area. Both on the interior and exterior, there is careful attention paid to detail and quality of craftsmanship. The broad over-hanging eaves complemented with decorative cornice and pediment molding lend to the structure a clean, defined appearance. L-E T i f r � 's.a. J•` ,.r+..-�3�'_ _ ;;�'. _err,-.ter-r--» y .' ..§-w.t• +,-,� ,...�t.,�,e.•R.., 4rAr 7T oil 47 •• y ' • • WMC 1 } e � Y v_ . 4a5af RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 93-03 TO DESIGNATE THE HOPPE HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6155 EAST AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 225-191-16. A. Recitals. (i) Wayne and Vanessa Smith have filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 12, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately one-half acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 6155 East Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 12, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Facts: The turn-of-the-century realities of the family-based, rural, agricultural lifestyle in the Etiwanda community are exemplified in the Hoppe House. Near to their acres of lemon, orange, and apricot groves, the home was removed geographically from the core of the Etiwanda town, but connected in many ways through economic, social, cultural, educational, and religious ties. `--R - 2$ HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Facts: The number of grove houses, while never multitudinous, had decidedly shrunk as residential development has replaced agricultural production. Still relatively rural, the present-day setting of Hoppe House continues to reflect the Etiwanda of 50 and 100 years ago. Finding 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or local personality. Facts: The Hoppe family, while never necessarily famous, were an important and long-lived thread in the community fabric of Etiwanda. For almost 100 years, the family contributed to the social and economic history of the town. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Facts: The Hoppe House stands as a lasting reminder to the architectural styles of the agricultural communities of Southern California, circa 1915, and to the development of the Etiwanda community. It is an elegant yet functional element of the area's built environment. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Facts: For the past 81 years, the Hoppe House has stood as a testament to the early history of the community. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of .the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Application 93-03 on this 12th day of January 1993. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 93-03 - SMITH January 12, 1993 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993. Marsha Meek Banks, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 12, 1993 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEMOLITION REVIEW AND LANDMARK DESIGNATION 93-02 OR POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 93-01 - NORA AND JOSE CHAO/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to demolish the Etiwanda Auto Repair, a potential local landmark and Unreinforced Masonry Building, located at 12906 Base Line Road, and a proposal to either re-evaluate the potential significance of the structure or designate it as a local Landmark or Point of Historic Interest - APN: 227-131-17. This action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. BACKGROUND AND CASE ANALYSIS The Commission reviewed the structure and preliminarily determined its significance as part of its review of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings (URMB) in February 1990, (see Exhibit HPC-1 for Survey form) . At the time of the survey of URMBs, the hired consultant, Lynn Merrill, had not determined that Harne's garage met the City's criteria for Landmark designation. At the February 1990 meeting, however, Commissioner Banks stated the building's significance to the Etiwanda community qualified it as a potential local landmark and it was thus denoted. The City's URMB Ordinance, as well as the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance, govern the review process of the demolition request submitted by the Chao family. Per the URMB Ordinance, the owners of URMBs had 270 days from the passing of the Ordinance to indicate their intentions to either demolish or retrofit their respective buildings. This initial step had to be completed by February 1992, unless owners had asked for and received a one year extension from the Building Official. The Chaos did request this extension but it was not granted' because both they and City staff were researching the plausibility of reusing the structure as a garage (City staff has treated the Chao case as if we had granted an extension, allowing extra time for the Chaos to determine what action they wanted to take) . If the Chaos had not submitted a request to demolish the building, per the URMB Ordinance, the Building Official would have initiated a demolition process. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-02 - NORA & JOSE CHAO January 12, 1993 Page 2 The Chaos first wanted to retrofit and reuse the structure as a garage - a non-conforming, non-permitted use by the site's current zoning. Although Mr. Chao did occasional automobile repair work on this site, the owners were unable to prove that they had continuously used the building as a garage, and any non-conforming use that is inactive for greater than 180 days reverts to the requirements of the underlying land use designation. Working with Planning Department staff, who in turn sought the input of the City's Engineering Department staff, the Chaos then investigated the possibilities of formally applying to resume an. auto repair use in the building. The Etiwanda Specific Plan does not allow for auto repair uses in a residentially zoned area. The only way for the Chaos to apply for permission to reuse the building would be per the special use variations incentive given to designated landmarks as specified in the Development Code (Section 17.08.030.7) . With this incentive, landmark owners may request, via the Conditional Use Permit process, a small-scale, non-residential use. Previous examples of this process include the Cousin's (Christmas) House as a Bed and Breakfast and the Albert House as a home and boutique. This section of the Development Code was not written with uses like auto repair in mind, but rather for minor offices, antique shops, book stores, florists, and other low-intensity businesses. If this Commission were to designate the building as a Landmark and they and the Planning Commission were to approve the conditional Use Permit, the owners would be responsible for all on- and off-site improvements. Per City codes, policies, and ordinances, these improvements could and probably would include items like the following: street dedication, drainage facilities, driveway cuts, right turn lanes, construction, and a variety of on-site improvements such as parking lot construction and landscaping. These required improvements would decidedly be cost prohibitive, ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars in initial outlay. SITS LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Location and Description: The parcel is a relatively flat piece of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue. The site is roughly 150 square feet in size and relatively clear of any vegetation or landscaping. Site Land Use, Zoning, Specific Plan Designations: Per the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the parcel's land use is Low-Medium Residential. From the late 1930s to the mid-1980s, it was utilized as a filling station and later solely as an auto repair garage. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, Etiwanda Specific Plan Designations: Land to the north, south, and east of the subject site is also zoned for Low-Medium Residential use. The parcel to the west retains a Community Service designation that allows for mixture of residential and low-impact commercial/office uses. C - Z HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-02 - NORA & JOSE CHAO January 12, 1993 Page 3 Physical Description: This single-storied, rectangularly shaped structure was constructed of unreinforced concrete blocks. Its masonry walls are covered by a wood-framed, side-gabled roof, the eaves of which extend slightly over the building walls. Large sliding doors of corrugated iron provide auto access from the south and west sides of the building and at the southwest corner a one- by-one planed aluminum window and standard sized doors allow light and pedestrian access to that part of the structure, which most likely served as an office. A small, shed-roofed bay has been added to the buildings rear (north) facade. A concrete pad that used to serve as the gas pump island was present at the time of the 1990 survey but has since been removed. Signs denoting the structure as the "Etiwanda Auto Repair" have been painted over but are still present. SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS Historical Background and Significance: Not much is known about Ethel Geidner who owned the site when the building was constructed in 1929-1930. She and F. L. Geidner owned the property until 1945 when it was sold to Lawrence and Miriam Mueller. Lawrence was the son of Ernst and Katharine Stegmeier Mueller and Miriam's sister, Catherine, was married to Tom Harne. The Harnes ran the garage until retiring in the mid-1970s. Like the Pearson Filling Station and Garage on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, the garage served as an important link in the daily patterns of life in the small agricultural community of Etiwanda. Although an extensive body of research supporting this building does not exist, staff believes that the building's significance is such that it meets the intent of our Historic Preservation Ordinance. The structure is of modest size and design and lacks any distinguishing architectural characteristics as it was constructed for, utilitarian and functional uses. It has retained its basic structural integrity, but its contextual significance has been diminished by the widening of Base Line Road and the related residential build-up in the area. Issues: This demolition request is complicated by the difficulties the building's owner would encounter if they pursued reusing it and by the time constraints placed on the City per the State-mandated URMB compliance. February 1993, will mark the date at which all retrofitting work shall be commenced on identified buildings or the demolition of the building. Furthermore, per the URMB Ordinance, the Commission may require the owner of an identified building to complete a feasibility study that examines the possibilities of reusing and rehabilitating the building. Requiring this of a husband and wife owner would seem excessive in light of the difficulties and costs that the owner C - 3 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-02 - NORA & JOSE CHAO January 12, 1993 Page 4 would go through to complete any retrofitting and especially the on- and off-site costs associated with developing the site. Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are excepted under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. The requested demolition of the building, known as the Harne's Garage, would have a negative impact on the environment if completed. Staff recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration with the following mitigations: 1. Document the building with photographs, measured drawings, and descriptive narrative roughly following the Guidelines set forth by the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) . 2. Require the placement of a City-approved Point of Interest plaque, when the site is developed, that describes the structure and its history. FACTS FOR FINDINGS Per Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the following findings are made in support of this designation application: Historic and Cultural Significance: Findings: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: Representing the prime years of the Etiwanda citrus community, the structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and development. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the station and its owners were part of the local area's cultural fabric. Findings: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, including the Etiwanda area. Most of these roadside stations and garages have fallen out of use or been abandoned or demolished. With their loss, physical reminders of the everyday patterns that characterized community life 60 years ago are fading. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting Findings: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. C - 4 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 93-02 - NORA & JOSE CHAO January 12, 1993 Page 5 Fact: For over 65 years, Harne's Garage has been a community resource and its owners, the Geidners and Muellers have added to the communal experience of the Etiwanda area. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the Commission should recommend to the City Council that the Harne's Garage/Etiwanda Auto Repair be designated as a Point of Historic Interest and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be issued for the demolition permit for the said structure. Respectfully submitted, Lar J. Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Historic Resource Survey Form Exhibit "HPC-2" - Site Map Resolution of Approval C 10, State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY Ser. No. IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION National Register Status: I. Historic Name: Harne's Garage Local Designation: 2. Common or Current Name: Etiwanda Auto Repair 3. Number & Street: 12906 W. Baseline Ave. City: Rancho Cucamonga Vicinity Only: Zip: County (3-Letter Designator): 4. Quad Map No:. UTM 2 A: B: C: D: 5. Parcel No: 0227-131-17 Other: DESCRIPTION 6. Property Category: If District, Number of Documented Resources: 7. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the property, including condition, boundaries, surroundings, and (if appropriate) architectural style: Single story rectangular shaped structure, of concrete block construction with side gable roof of composite shingles. There will be large corrugated iron sliding doors on the south and west sides of the structure. A single entrance is located on the south side with a one by one aluminum window. There appears to be a shed extension to the rear of the structure. A sign is located on the south side that reads "Etiwanda Auto Repair". The sign has been painted over. A small concrete island that used to hold the gas pumps is located immediately in front of the building. There is a small addition to the rear of the structure that appears to have been restrooms. No landscaping is present on this side. Rock curbing and mature street trees are located along the west side of the property. 8. Alterations & Date: 9. Related Features on Property: 10. Planning Agency: - City of Rancho Cucamonga 11. Owner & Address: Jose Chao 12906 Baseline Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 12. Type of Ownership: Private 13. Present Use:Service Station Major 14. Zoning: Low-Medium (E.S.P.) 15. Threats: URMB C � HISTORICAL INFORMATION 16. Constuction Date(s): 1929 Original Location: Yes Date Moved: 17. Architect: Unknown Builder: Unknown 18. Historic Attributes (With Number from List): SIGNIFICANCE AND EVALUATION 19. Context for Evaluation: Theme: Area: Period: Property Type: Context formally developed?: 20. Briefly discuss the property's importance within the context. Use historical and architectural analysis as appropriate. Compare with similar properties. This structure represents a 1930s local automotive service station. It is of simple construction and styling. This type of structure would have been common for small communities such as Etiwanda, and would probably have been used as a local machine shop and blacksmith shop as well as a gas station. The structure was originally constructed in 1929 while the property was owned by Ethel B. Geidner. Geidner owned the property from 1921 to 1936, when an F.L Geidner was added to the deed. The Geidners owned the property until 1945, when it was sold to Laurence and Miriam Mueller. It appears that the site was used continuously as a service station until the 1980s. It has retained the original sign that says Etiwanda Auto Repair on the front and sides, as well as the concrete island where the gas pumps were located. It is an excellent example of a Local garage of this period. 21. Sources: San Bernardino County Lot Assessor Books Sketch map. Show Location and boundaries of property in relation to nearby streets, railways, 22. Applicable National Register Criteria: natural landmarks, etc. Name each feature. 23. Other recognition: State Landmark Number: 24. Evaluator: Lynn Merrill u/SJKr Year of Evaluation: 1990 qC P/loA��'1 25. Survey Type: S (C=Comprehensive, P=Project Related, S=Single Property 26. Survey Name: Rancho Cucamonga Update/URM Assessment 27. Year Form Prepared: 1990 3 By (Name): Lynn Merrill y Organization: Management Sciences Applications, Inc. Address: 123 East Ninth Street, Suite 204 City, State Zip: Upland, California, 91786 Phone: (714) 981-0894 1 � X sass x 1]088 i � 1 7 1300 W Q-•- � � 1i r r x OPPr '2990 t i \ )9.3 \ 141 X 1301 z� '� I x 1300.8 13p0 i i x ,29x.9 ,i x 99.5 OPP 1299.0 BASELINE x 12978 - I i� x 12913 O `ty O p O O p S T } p 00 O O O x 1289.3 r` DOD 000 00 00000 00 00 O ti ITEM: �• .v. �I3-02 Litz t' alga TITLE: 54-M, Map N II EXHIBIT: 2 SCALE: u�� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 93- 01 OR HISTORIC LANDMARK 93-02 TO DESIGNATE HARNE'S GARAGE, LOCATED AT 12906 BASE LINE ROAD, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST OR LANDMARK - APN: 227-131-17. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Jose and Nora Chao have submitted a demolition request for the said property. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 12, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately a one-half acre of land, basically a square configuration, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 12, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1 : The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: Representing the prime years of the Etiwanda citrus community, the structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and development. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the station and its owners were a part of the local area's cultural fabric. Q� C - 1 HPC RESOLUTION NO. LD 93-02 - HARNE'S GARAGE January 12, 1993 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact: Gas stations and garages from the early age of the automobile were a prominent feature of many local landscapes, including the Etiwanda area. Most of these roadside stations and garages have fallen out of use or been abandoned or demolished. With their loss, physical reminders of the everyday patterns, that characterized community life 60 years ago, are fading. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting Finding 1: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Fact: For over 65 years, Harne's Garage has been a community resource and its owners, the Geidners and Muellers have added to the communal experience of the Etiwanda area. 5. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration with the following mitigations: a. Document the building with photographs, measured drawings, and descriptive narrative roughly following the Guidelines set forth by the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) . b. Require the placement of a City-approved Point of Interest plaque, when the site is developed, that describes the structure and its history. 6• Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 , 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of this Landmark Application on the 12th day of January 1993. 7. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 1993• Marsha Meek Banks, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: