The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/03/05 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA THURSDAY MARCH 5, 1992 7:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACTION I. Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner X Commissioner Haskvitz X Commissioner Banks X Commissioner Preston X Commissioner Billings X Chairman Schmidt X Commissioner Cooper X III. Approval of Minutes 6-0-1 February 6, 1992 (Billings arrived after vote) IV. Presentation of Commendation to Cathy Morris for her Chairman Schmidt volunteer efforts in creating a Historic Bicycle Tour for presented the Boy Scout Troop 655 commendation to Cathy Morris V. New Business A. Steve Preston-Chair A. Election of Chairperson & vice-Chairperson Marsha Banks-Vice Chair VI. Director's Reports B. Recommended revisions B. REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - THE HENRY for conditions to be ALBERT HOUSE - A local landmark, located at 10323 passed on to Planning 19th Street. Commission. VII. Commission Business C. Budget reviewed - C. BUDGET REVIEW FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992-94 - GOALS AND Goals & work program WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP - (Relocate to the DeAnza Room) back. next month for discussion. D. Planning for the 1992 State Preservation Conference D. Commission recommended in Eureka, CA Schmidt, Hartig & Henderson attend conf. VIII. public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to No Comments address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 9:25 PM IX. Adjournment it CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA THURSDAY MARCH 5, 1992 7:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCA14ONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz Commissioner Banks Commissioner Preston Commissioner Billings Chairman Schmidt Commissioner Cooper III. Approval of Minutes February 6, 1992 IV. Presentation of Commendation to Cathy Morris for her volunteer efforts in creating a Historic Bicycle Tour for Boy Scout Troop 655 V. New Business A. Election of Chairperson & Vice-Chairperson VI. Director's Reports B. REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - THE HENRY ALBERT HOUSE - A local landmark, located at 10323 19th Street. VII. Commission Business C. BUDGET REVIEW FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992-94 - GOALS AND WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP - (Relocate to the DeAnza Room) D. Planning for the 1992 State Preservation Conference in Eureka, CA VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. Adjournment j VV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA THURSDAY MARCH 5, 1992 7:00 p.m. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CzNTBR COUNCIL CHAM38R 10500 CIVIC CEIiTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance 07:00 PM II. Roll Call r Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz _ ` Commissioner Banks ?` Commissioner Preston Commissioner Billings Chairman Schmidt Commissioner Cooper r III. Approval of Minutes 13�+ CRR"r ,�� ,�Y,�;q �� r J � February 6, 1992 C l Aca�r r-*4-. ScAW ,&Ip. Presentation of Cams endation to Cathy Morris for her qv volunteer efforts in creating a Historic Bicycle Torr for C.oftyv%rr%410. `•°l^ Boy Scout Troop 655 MS. M.orC%5 V. New Business v1.�p. ttoi�r A. Election of Chairperson & Vice-Chairperson VI. Director's Reports tGDrvtm�e. t,� sOiS"e*sB. REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - THE HENRY t'Go�nd �'1`i a�n5 be. ALBERT HOUSE - A local landmark, located at 10323 Qasse:� Cr , T1ar+Mi" 19th Street. Ca S 10 V\ VII. Commission Business -gL'`Aq -t C,0 OAS �- C. pro BUDGET REVIEW FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992-94 - GOALS AND W'sf�rl� AGk �x.�. yy�by` dor tSCus9+o�^ WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP - (Relocate to the DeAnza Room) C�w►r+n S s E o n l-e Ge w+mc+rd�d D. Planning for the 1992 State Preservation Conference d•t htv% icseY. in Eureka, CA VIII. Public Cosmients 0 (10 M Wva-11•-S This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. �• L: •�+'� ' IZ. Adjournment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - THE HENRY ALBERT HOUSE - A local landmark, located at 10323 19th Street. BACKGROUND: The lessees of the historic Henry Albert House desire to operate a small boutique, encompassing approximately 612 square feet, in part of the bottom floor of the two-story structure. The City's Development Code conditionally permits such low-intensity uses within landmark buildings lying in a residential zone. Commission staff has worked with t1fe project planner, Steve Hayes, as well as with Engineering Division's staff in the initial processing of this application (see Exhibit "HPC-1," the Uniform Application for the CUP) . Because the applicant proposes no physical changes to the landmark at this time, a Landmark Alteration Permit is not required; although as part of the Conditional Use Permit process, the Commission should review the project. ANALYSIS: The application for the Conditional Use Permit has been deemed complete by Planning and Engineering staff and it appears the requested requirements will not have a discernable impact on the historic structure. After reviewing the "Preliminary Conditions" placed on the CUP (see Exhibit "HPC-2"), staff does have a comment. The condition requiring the applicant to construct a garage with an approved Landmark Alteration Permit within five years seems a fair proposal. In general, it seems that all the other conditions, as written, allow for sufficient review by the Planning Division. Thus, the Historic Preservation Commission's staff will approve the final configuration of the slightly expanded circular driveway, the landscaping plans, and the appearance and location of all signs. 1 The Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance details a "Landmark Change of Use Procedure -- Special Use Permit Requirements" (Section 2.24. 110). However, this section is not consistent with the more recently approved Development Code that specifies the Conditional Use Permit process be utilized for such use requests in landmarks and not a Special Use Permit. In the past, it seems that such instances were handled jointly, if informally, by the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission. In the future, the process should be better defined and included in the updated Ordinance. m4c G IM _J HPC STAFF REPORT CUP 92-08 - HENRY ALBERT HOUSE March 5, 1992 Page 2 A condition by the Engineering Division (Issue No. 1 ) that deals with the modification of the site's northern boundary wall should be refined. Staff would like to see the existing block wall altered in a way that is sympathetic to the character of the historic site and not for instance, be a color or configuration that detracts from the structure. Highly "decorative wrought iron" in a color would not blend well with the home's Queen Anne style. If it appears to staff that at any time during the process a change occurs that could potentially impact the site or structure or would require further review by the Commission, staff will bring the CUP back for further input. RECOMMENDATION: In staff's opinion, the Historic Preservation Commission should forward a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission of the specified use of the Henry Albert House as defined in the application for CUP 92-08 and of the preliminary conditions specified by the Planning and Engineering Divisions with the following addition: Engineering Division, Issue No. 1 , should include language conditioning commencement of the requested use to approval of the final design and specifications of the wall by the Planning Division. Respectfully submitted, 4Lryv . Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AMH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Uniform Application Exhibit "HPC-2" - Preliminary Conditions � - Z I � CITY OF R 'CHO CUCAMONGA Uniform ' C0 =u1°i`'uevebp>�t ` I. »�C.�Dd . Application c .aCA #17M� , Part 1 Nasse dllopatl Pyojnaat Lacasio.d Projsrs #11� o 3a 3 1 f s- !tz-,xt or►• L&W Dmcdpdm d PMjM(Aswsces Pascal No.) /o7G- fJ!-O�l AR*Onfs Nasse Pbm Nmebw Adhm /613 a.3 l S S% z L a-yr.ft e- LAfd Owen's Nu ddbbm abosy Nmbw C4" < Ad&m -.6 ge ClWg.0 h RJD 4Ve7- ja7- C o ri/ 7�r1 Type of Rovkw Requested(PlInn Cbwk AN AppNobb Hawed O Comer PLn Amakinim O Cieneeal Plain Amendment O Teamdve Parcel Map O eooditioaal Use Peatmit O H7lside Development>4 DU O Teortive Tract Map Coodidauld Use Permit O Hillside Development:S4 DU O Varadas of Pubik Right-dway X fico) Q Land nmk Ahmmico Permit ar Basement O Dev/Dedgo Review-CommAuft O Lai Lim Aouaaeot O Varisoc* O Dev/Desip Review.Raidaukl O Mioor Development Review O Use Lesrmindam O Development Agreecnalt O How Excwdoo O Other: O Devekpsm District Amendmeast O Ply Review O Entatainmeut Pamir O SpecWc Plan Ameodmeat PROJECT Dswib d Du=ipd=of Piapored PtojM Gbh Adwdmd Sh@m if Neoss=y) OPE�C�17f RSrr�leL S�Tit' F/•�.-tR Awa/ 6iF=i Be77Qvt j7le A"a�a� pori7vti A-F ice• aD s d,. PAP 7,` /e7vr+�� o�.•. 7` �C cr 7-0al12C / oft a C.,&.-& -. .f- �!a e A, ,^.t els C'%f"( Le uTOrIC 01. CITY Of RANCI10 CucA"AONGA PLANNING DIVISION FAES OS 199 • I omdlyr do I a ptiae0b dire leW owner of dt* dacdbed ptoPM ftdm.I atknmvWge the tiling of d*IWJC&tim and em i*dirt aU of die above is onudon is true and eoUSM(Itdro nnderdgtsed is difftnu from die iegai pe+opesrty owner,a le.Rer of moat a000aipny dtie bio.) Date _ S Print Nam*sod Tide CR,jDicE T�/fNSaJ ,y/l� L Ow,.•£ � Reedred Repel it F P Rsoti" C S61@10.gW VbV Receipt No. - ` Ob - 3 r-M SIT HPC-t M 1coralIKO1 ; d%` w 1 . PROJECT AREA 11F;EA DI`�TRIF?1.) FIC7rJ fAcw,l S(I Ft. of Hot Are�i r IOOR AHLA PY � a� 1) 11It d t1, 1 A<<..� ,.'A .r. �,...a<a r KIM _-_- FIZA 90.: CUP 92-08 (PIa.LQNARZ CONDITIONS) DOTE: This information is provided to assist in preparation for the Historic Preservation and Planning Commission meetings. Additional conditions may be applied based an current Code requirements and Commission policies prior to the Planning Cammiission hearing. I. Planning Division: A. Technical Issues - The following preliminary technical issues are minimum code requirements which must be satisfied in conjunction with potential Planning Commission approval of the project: 1. A "parking area" shall be constructed directly adjacent to the circular driveway to accommodate visitors of the shop at a ratio of one space for 250 square feet of floor area utilized for the gift shop. The design of the parking area shall conform to current code requirements including- stall size, striping, manuevering area and landscaping. The specific parking lot design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, and shall be constructed prior to utilizing the residence as a gift and flower shop. 2. in a five year period from the date of Planning Commission approval, a minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided that emulates the architecture of the Albert House. The plans for the garage shall be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Cosmission prior to issuance of building permits for the garage. A Landmark Alternation permit shall be filed in conjunction with the garage addition. 3. Street trees and ground cover shall be provided along 19th Street in accordance with the 19th Street master plan. Detailed landscape/irrigation plans depicting conformance with the master plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner and City Engineer prior to installation. Prior to cosmencinq the proposed gift/flower shop use, said landscaping and irrigation system shall be installed in conformance with the approved plans. 4. Any signs(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation. Said sign(s ) shall reflect the architectural character of the Albert House, as determined by the City Planner. � � S WT qFr, 2- CUP 92-08 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS February 21, 1992 Page 2 S. The proposed use shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to commencement of the new use. 6. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission in 5 years from the date of approval to ensure compliance with the condition of approval requiring a 2 car garage. II. Engineering Division: A. Issues: The following items shall be conditions of approval and shall be constructed prior to comise ncement of use: 1. The number of vehicles using the driveway will increase due to the commercial enterprise. Therefore, to insure _ the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk, the existing - block wall shall be modified to improve visibility by replacing that portion of wall not used for retaining purposes with a decorative wrought iron fence not exceeding 4 feet in height across the entire 19th Street frontage. 2. Sidewalk shall be contracted on the Hamilton Street frontage. 3. One driveway shall be assigned as an "Entrance Only" and the other an "Exit Only". Be Information: 1. Parking is not allowed on 19th Street. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: BUDGET REVIEW FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992-94 - GOALS AND WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP BACKGROUND: At the Commission's last meeting on February 6, 1992, staff was directed to return to the next meeting with the work program materials. Staff has completed a draft of the proposed 1992-94 Work Program. At the workshop, staff will include suggestions for long-range, five-year goal setting as requested by the Commission. ANALYSIS: Work Program: The Historic Preservation Work Program is presented on a two fiscal year basis from 1992-94. This formatting is in conformance with the same format utilized for the Planning Commission - Planning Staff's Work Program. Programs are grouped in three areas: the first area is "Programs We Can Accomplish With Current Staffing"; the second group is "New or Continued Programs We Must Accomplish, But Need More Staff"; and the third group is "Programs We Would Like To See Accomplished, But Need More Staff." The actual work program summary is contained in Exhibit "HPC-2." In addition, a list of detailed descriptions for each program is contained in Exhibit "HPC-3." Last year's Historic Preservation Commission budget is included and can be discussed at the workshop. Given the current economics, staff anticipates no increase in the Commission's 1992-93 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission review and comment on the Draft Budget and Work Program contained herein with emphasis placed on formulating a long-range goal process. Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LJH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Draft Historical Preservation Budget for Fiscal Years 1992-93 Exhibit "HPC-2" - Historic Preservation Work Program Summary for Fiscal Years 1992-94 Exhibit "HPC-3" - Historic Preservation Work Program Descriptions for Fiscal Years 1992-94 �t� G DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1992-1993 MARCH 5, 1992 PROGRAM: Historic Preservation Commission Object Number 3100 Travel and Meetings - Hist. Pres. Conf. Local Workshops $ 350 California State Pres. Foundation Conf. $ 1,800 National -Trust for Hist. Pres. Conf. $ 2,000 SUBTOTAL $ 4, 150 3900 Misc. Printing $ 500 3956 Dues & Membership California Preservation Foundation $ 200 National Trust for Historic Preservation $ 130 SUBTOTAL $ 330 PROGRAM TOTAL $ 4,980 PROGRAM: Planning 3100 Travel and Meetings - Staff Local Preservation Meeting $ 125 State Preservation Meeting $ 650 National Preservation Meeting $ 0 SUBTOTAL $ 775 3900 Maint. & Operations Landmark Plaques $ 11000 HPC Documents & Forms $ 11500 Archive Equipment & Supplies $ 0 SUBTOTAL $ 2,500 6028 Contract Services HPC Minutes $ 600 HPC Archives Consultant $ 0 Oral History Program $ 0 (Staff has applied for R.C. Foundation Funding) SUBTOTAL $ 600 8955 CDBG - Planning Historic Preservation Rehabilitation $ 51000* URMB Seismic Studies/Rehabilitation $ 0 Old Alta Loma Economic Study $ 0 *Money remaining from previous year's budget SUBTOTAL $ 51000 GRAND TOTAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES $13,855 C - Z HISTORIC PRESERVATION WORK PROGRAM S'UNNARY FISCAL YEAR 1992-94 PROGRAM ITEM YEAR STATUS WKS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING: 1 . Historic Properties Inventory List Updates 92/93 Ongoing 12.0 2. Landmark Desig./Alter. Applic. Process 92/93 Ongoing 10.0 3. Mills Act Contract Processing/Monitoring 92/93 Ongoing 4.4 4. Public Information Processing Requests 93/93 Ongoing 15.8 5. Staff Training and Project Assistance 92/93 Ongoing 6.2 6. Oral History Program 92/93 Ongoing 11 .0 7. Archives Program 92/93 Ongoing 12.0 .8. URMB Mitigation Funding & Administration 92/93 Ongoing 4.4 9. Historic Building Rehabilition Program 92/93 NEW 7.4 10. Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan 92/93 NEW 22.0 11. Redevelopment Agency Re-Use Projects 92/94 NEW 9.0 Subtotal 114.2 - NEW OR CONTINUED PROGRAMS WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF 1. Route 30 Review/Monitoring 92/93 Ongoing 1 .5 2. Landmark Plaque Implementation 92/93 Ongoing 3.5 3. Certified Local Government Program 92/93 On hold 4.0 4. Etiwanda & Foothill SP Review/Update 93/93 On hold 8.0 5. Long-Term Outreach Projects: Brochure, 93/93 On hold 6.0 Exhibit, Slide Show 6,• Archaeological Map Update/Review 92/94 On hold 3.0 Subtotal 26.0 PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF 1. Heritage Walkway 92/93 Ongoing 4.5 2. HPC Ordinance Update 92/93 On Hold 4.0 3. North Town Survey Update 92/93 NEW 19.0 4. Historic Agricultural Land Preservation 92/93 NEW 10.0 Program Subtotal 36.5 TOTAL 176.7 C - 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1992-94 DETAILED PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS PROGRAM ITEM p/WKS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING: I. HISTORIC PROPERTIES INVENTORY LIST UPDATES: 12.0 This item involves the continuing update of the Historic Properties Inventory List. This list is the comprehensive summary data on all sites that have received a completed historical survey. The subject list is organized by Assessor's Parcel Numbers and is updated continuously with new information as regards to new sites, sites that have received an updated survey, or have received an upgrade in historic level of significance. 2. LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND/OR ALTERATION APPLICATION 10.0 PROCESSING, REVIEW, AND MONITORING: This item involves the processing of applications for Landmark Designations and/or Alterations, as well as the monitoring and follow-up of such actions. Such applications may be generated by either the City Council, Historic Preservation Commission, or the property owner. This area of the work program is difficult to predict in terms of the need for staff resources, however, it should be noted that Current Planning staff will be trained further in the area of Historic Preservation and they may be able to absorb some of the requests that occur beyond the allocated 10 project work weeks spread over the next two years. 3. MILLS ACT CONTRACT PROCESSING AND MONITORING: 4.4 This work program item involves processing of property owner requests for Mills Act Contract. This activity represents a major incentive to property owners to request landmark designation of their properties in order to secure significant property tax reductions. In addition, these property tax reductions are intended to secure some additional level of maintenance and/or improvements to historical resources within the City. The City has processed one previous Mills Act Contract and staff is currently undergoing discussions with property owners considering two to three others. Inasmuch as the Mills Act Contract language has been standardized and through the approval of the first Mills Act Contract, a policy processing direction has been established. Staff believes that the hours allocated, although low, will be adequate. C "' 1 PROGRAM ITEM P/WKS 4. PUBLIC INFORMATION PROCESSING REQUESTS: 15.8 This service is to provide information to the public at the counter and over the telephone. A significant amount of staff time is utilized conducting this Very valuable function. The public information contacts contained in this work program item may or may not result in the filing of appropriate historic preservation applications. 5. STAFF TRAINING AND ASSISTANCE: 6.2 Staff training and assistance involves in-house staff development of a cultural resources management training program. Staff will conduct an ongoing educational series for the Planning Division in order to integrate the cultural resources review into the rest of the City's required CEQA Environmental Review. It is the intent to have each project planner within Current Planning trained and versed in Cultural Resources Management to manage consultants contracts and judge submitted reports. Project planners would then be responsible for producing staff reports and other documentation as needed for presentation of reports and development related applications for landmarks and landmark alteration permits. 6. ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM: 11.0 The oral history program began under the 1990-91 budget. The intent of this program is to train volunteers and to conduct, with in-house staff, a limited number of additional oral history interviews and to continue the library cataloging of these interviews. The 1990-91 Oral History Program was funded through additional contributions by the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Foundation. If additional funds become available through this or other revenue sources, this program may be further expanded and accelerated. 7. ARCHIVES PROGRAM: 12.0 The archives program was established to archive important City department records under the 1989-90 Budget. The archives program will continue utilizing in-house staff and to train volunteers. The manual has been completed and approved. At this time, volunteers are being sought and many have expressed interest in the program. Volunteer workshops and training sessions are in the development stages currently. C — �_ PROGRAM ITEM P/WIGS 8. UNRBINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING ORDINANCE. MOITORING 4.4 Continue to monitor and provide liaison assistance to the Building and Safety Division staff for those buildings of Historical Significance. 9. HISTORIC BUILDING REHABILITATION PROGRAM: 7.4 This program is intended to provide funding for a variety of historic preservation activities. Within this program, funds are provided by the CDBG allocation from two prior years (90-91 & 91-92) amounting to approximately $40,200. These funds are to be used for a variety of activities including rehabilitation of blighted historic structures and historic preservation planning in Old Alta Loma. Current projects include the Chaffey-Garcia house and the G.P. Ledig House restorations. 10. OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 22.0 This program involves the preparation and processing of a neighborhood plan for the rehabilitation and revitalization of the Old Alta Loma area. XY features of the plan would include rehabilitation of the commercial buildings including the American King Company Citrus Packing House Complex, the Billings Store, the Old Alta Loma Volunteer Firefighters Building, and many other structures in the area. Rey components of the plan would include an economic market study to determine potential compatible aQmssroial ,uses ,4 .:<I c =µ revitalization- of -the area Ift ,addition, -dem _ i ng those buildings and facilities which need rehabilitation and the identification of implementation resources. During Fiscal Year 1990-91, $5,670 was used to fund a half-time planning intern position to complete the process of conducting detailed survey and analysis. 11. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE-USE PROGRAMS 9.0 Provide liaison assistance to the Redevelopment Agency on various low-moderate income housing projects, including the . Packing House re-use- effb t'i of-well aq,, other projects that may arise. C — cam PROGRAM ITEM P/WKS NEW OR CONTINUED PROGRAMS WE MUST ACCOMPLISH- AND NEED MORE STAFF: 1. ROUTE 30 REVIEW/MONITORING: 1.5 Involves the continuation of review and monitoring. of the mitigations contained in the Route 30 EIS. This program would also involve liaison work with the City's Engineering Division and affected property owners. LAbiDM M PLAM MUIW"rA'l. Continuation of the Landmark P11aquW Program through the provision of landmark plaques prhibffr11t 'in thmli cases where u: si " can: �be' impliv*Atkk � irapart��'=,• _ P owner a veld er- project imp tatio r. `io' at'P-114u4 at Showalter Rancho was installed and dedicated. 3. CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM: 4.0 Fi6o9rset* avolves updating he Rfstorid-- IAbs artlo - commission'" Ordinance to - comply►"' --state �F requirements. These State-- xlPfUrementa apply to the establishment of a certified local government program and thereby make the City eligible for State historic preservation grant funding. - 4. ETIWANDA AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW/UPDATE: 8.0 The Historic Preservation Commission requested this item be put on the work program in order for the Commission to review the subject specific plans for adequacy of historic preservation requirements and activities. This review and update may have to be primarily conducted by Current Planning Division staff because of the limited availability of Historic Preservation Commission staff. King M 6.0 }.. . ........ #u _.rzN' .,...„, .'14.°w"�,..e�r",,. The outre '`pt "+' consist of th .: Cts - . are of a°public information and educational aspect. These projects are intended to encourage and promote grass roots public involvement in Historic Preservation Commission activities throughout the City. 6. ARCHAEOLOGICAL MAP UPDATE 3.0 In cooperation with the local Archaeological Information Center, monitor and assess areas of potential and designated archaeological sensitivity. C - -`1 PROGRAM ITEM P/WKS PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF: 1. HERITAGE WALKWAY: 4.5 This item was initiated by the Historic Preservation Commission during Fiscal Year 1990-91. To date, the project has resulted in the selection of a Park and Recreation and Historic Preservation Sub-committee. Details concerning what the Heritage Walkway may entail has not been determined and in addition, a funding source has not been identified. 2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDINANCE UPDATE: 4.0 This item would involve updating the Historic Preservation Commission . Ordinance to reflect the Planning Division's role versus the Community Services Department's role in staffing the Historic Preservation Commission as well as other technical amendments requested by the Commission. 3. NORTH TOWN SURVEY UPDATE: 18.0 This is a new program item brought on through concern of staff that the historical inventory record for the structures in the North Town area is not adequate or sufficient. It is therefore staff's recommendation that an update of the Historical Inventory Survey be conducted within this area at a future date. 4. HISTORIC AGRICULTURE LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM: 10.0 Staff feels that the rapidly disappearing remains of the area's agricultural past demands preservation. The Commission has expressed concerns over the incorporation of vineyards and groves into a detailed policy on such land retention. Staff would first survey the City and locate potential lands, then develop a viable land use/preservation program, and finally work towards its implementation. C -- 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 5, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT ON OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN (OALNP) BACKGROUND: This report is intended to apprise the Commission on the status of projects currently influencing the future of the Old Alta Loma area. In addition, the report provides a tentative schedule of the processing of the subject neighborhood plan. No formal action is required by the Commission at this time. As you are aware, the creation of a Neighborhood Plan has been a goal of the General Plan for many years. In the General Plan, this community is defined as an "area where the village of Alta Loma started and contains older residences as well as newer community office buildings . . . bounded by Base Line Road, Southern Pacific Railroad, Monte Vista Street, Archibald and Hellman Avenues" (page III-89) . The Neighborhood Plan as defined in the General Plan included the retention of a historic feel and neighborhood character of the area by the creation of a special streetscape design as well as standards and guidelines for future pedestrian oriented commercial development (page III-91) . ANALYSIS: As part of the Commission staff's work program, the development of the OALNP began last year with a complete resurvey of the target area. Along with the survey, the other catalyst for the commencement of work on the OALNP comes in the form of the Redevelopment Agency's proposed rehabilitation of the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House (more recently the home of the American National Can plant) . After the Agency received the initial feasibility study from the consultants, Architectural Resources Group, escrow closed on the site in late fall of 1991. The consultants recommended the rehabilitation of the City's oldest surviving packing house complex for a mixed-use/low- income senior housing project after an in-depth study. Their investigation revealed that currently and in the future a market will exist for affordable housing for the City's maturing population and that the packing house is structurally and geographically a fitting location for such units. Other uses in combination with housing were recommended, including selected retail/commercial venues and a permanent community services facility. Staff is now reviewing the firm's suggestions and will commence project development after receiving approval from the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board. MEMO TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN March 5, 1992 Page 2 CONCLUSION: Staff would like to make every effort to integrate the development of the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House rehabilitation project with the creation of the Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan. The approximately four-acre mixed-use project could spearhead renewed interest in the historic core of that community. Thus, an in-house team composed of both current and advance planning staff have begun work on the plan. You will find attached for your review and assessment a tentative schedule for the drafting and finalization of the plan that the team has compiled. The Commission will be an integral part of the Plan's development and will have numerous opportunities for input and participation, including the workshop to be jointly held with the Planning Commission that has been tentatively set for April 29, 1992. The target date for completion of the Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan is late November of this year. Respectfully submitted, Larr J.4Henerson, AICP Principal Planner LJH:AH:AW:jfs Attachments: Old Alta Loma Neighborhood Plan Schedule OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PROJECT SCHEDULE January February March April May June July August September Oc yY®( 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4- 8 TASKS < Vine oft 1 Qjganizstion 6 Schedule ................... PGHPC progress repos 5:2/12 ♦ 3/5 U 2 Ressarch A Analysis: .....,..... opportunilles/constrnt land use alternatives rkin resent.graphics mailing list/map development standards historic Inventory completed review conceptual draft 3 Public Inoul Neighborhood Meeting :::<#>i::zz:. : 1 3/31 O �sY 4 PCNPC 4129 O 5 Draft Neighborhood Plan ..:::::...... finalize land use/zoning plan tamest 3 graphics ::........::::::•• :..,:::::....... ...:: ..: ...... ...•r:•rr::xx-ix2<�:e,':::#::�.>.�.,•.,-I.•.••.a:?Y::•:::r::;:++::c:.;x;:•>::;:•::::. :ri�rr:i::::•:;:;:.::?;.t:;•::. policies i Objectives :Y�••x.£:.::;a.:a.::.�:::::::::.:;:�:::::::•r:::� 'r'r':r` 'v.;•.;•{?c�:v'6,•::::•`:::2:;ix;xr:;:2••:<x�}r:r,•rc::.wii:f%c �::o:.�;:2..:;:;: development standards ;v: C.:........... x;;,;;•. preservation standards '{:%`':•it;:;{r•':%H:.2x::2: ;:;:: ::':•::•i:::;c::;`:'i ::Ns:s anis%:'-.?:: .,;x•;;i•+.';2�ii ::i2:;k:+•': '-::};2�i:2�:�'.:�:.:::i•:;::';;.,`•x':,•- Infrastructure imprv. .....:+�.s:;�:.::7�`:h'rc�+a'�i;�,c.'a3.i2"•:c- ':i?�::2)i:i`.x: ..�a'w�..:.::x..�•n.� iA'i-?:°:: Implementation :,•:..<; :. ••2>:;:;'.%::<••n...... hN.... ,;•rk•:,.,. 8/8 ''A::'•r:;xa'e`•;24z..{..'.�.>:xx,•to6iiw:;woect#a'YtfhR4C:o`Ct la .•:-:: In-house review plan revisions 6 Initial Studies Pb 1 i II ::.........::.. Assessment Noticing Notice of Determination 7 Puh9c Innut Neighborhood Workshop 8 Adoption Process PCIHPC report/homing (: .eoorVhearino 8 Final Plan Formtltinc staff time time - PC HPC CC C C sub other groups workshop meelings/reporta :::0 ♦ ■ O ♦ x 0 t/L 1y[i ? iiii33 .:. iG <'r ?` ' 'ry ............. ... ................ tint o Sam yet r e z t r s z t r ,agUWAON .."..0 H= STOR2 C PRESERVAT= ON LONG RANGE PROJECT GOALS PROJECT NAME 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Guidera/DiCarlo Residences GP Ledig House Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House NAMIMAWWWWAVAM Chaffey/Garcia House O Barn China House Old Alta Loma NP � Oral History �� Archives � ' i�/ ' Estacia Court Study Foothill B1vd. SP Review Etiwanda SP Review North Town NP I I I I I FUTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTS Demens/Tolstoy Residence Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Biane Winery ileewResidence TOLes