Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-093 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 93-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(/40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRk~JMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; WHERFAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which h_m_s been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council as duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental ~ in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby perliminarily approved and confirmed. That the diagrams showing the assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivision of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivision of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, frc~n said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual R~port for the Fiscal year 1993/94 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings Resolution No. 93-093 Page 2 PASSED, APPRfIv~D, and ADO~ this 21st day of April, 1993. Alexander, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: Buquet Dennis L. Stout, Mayor City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CT.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of April, 1993. Executed this 22nd day of April, 1993, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Resolution No. 93-093 Page 3 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Wiili~'Neil, City Engineer Resolution No. 93-093 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Ba~-Ifgrouna: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on arterial streets. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for Maintenance and Operations. These funds are no longer available. Projected Maintenance and Operations costs are increasing by nearly $49,000 over last fiscal year due primarily to the fact that Gas Tax can no longer subsidize the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: F~solution No. 93-093 Page5 Pr~o~d M~iatenanc~ Bullset for 1993/94 Total Personnel Mainterence and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $18,000.00 $18536O.00 $211,990.00 $117,27.00 $46390.00 $163~60.00 $375,650.00 $34,73O.OO $410,380.00 Analysis: The most significant impacts on the proposed FY 93/94 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operations of nearly $49,000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy, and an increase in the number of street lights and traffic signals. 1240.54 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 93/9,1 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. That is up $3.96 from the FY 92/93 rate of $13.81. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~d Use Type Unit~ pm~ F~nr A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 3,338.84 $17.77 2 $3534 $118,660.00 Single Family Parcel 16,426.00 $17.77 1 $17.77 $291.890.00 Total $410,550.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 6 EI Resolution No. 93-093 Page 7 SLD 1 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXEO ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED APRIL 1, 199Z TR 13Z98 15.72 AU APRIL 1, 1992 ?R 14365 /.I AU APRIL 1, 199Z TR 1/./~6 35 AU HAY 6, 199Z TR 1/.~07 11& AU NAY 6, 1992 TE 1/./.07-1 13 AU JUNE 3, 199Z TR 1464& 8 AU OCTOOER 7, 1992 DR 89-0~ ./.3 AC OCTOBER 7, 1992 PM 12959-1 18.27 AC OCTOBER 22, 1992 TR 1/.192 39 ALl NOVEMBER 18, 1992 PM 13724 30.~9 AC DECEMBER 2, 1992 I~1 13724 12.3 AC JANUAEY 20, 1993 C.U.P. 90-18 JANUARY 20, 1993 TR 13759 56 AU FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PN 14318 3./.7 AC Resolution No. 93-093 Page 8 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 W~am I.~.,;Ne~, City ~eer F~solution No. 93-093 Page 9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division S of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic sishals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance distrh:t. Generally this area e~compasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Have~ Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, ~ installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. PrQje~ted The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of $201,670. In the past, State Gas Tax funds have been used to subsidize the electricity charges in this district. These funds are no longer available and this is the reason for the $88,140 increase in electric utilities over last fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 baled upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as foUows: ..... T T ...................... "- Resolution No. 93-093 Page 10 Proposed M,intenance Budjet for 1993/94 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 92/93 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $9,980.00 $3,000.00 $9,870.00 $2,650.00 S201.670.00 $229,170.00 $48,620.00 $21.230.00 $69JL50.00 $299,020.00 $49.270.001 $249,7.50.00 AnaLysis: The most significant impact on the proposed FY 93/94 budget is the increase in electricity costs of over $80,000 to a projected annual cost of over $200,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or Slate Gas Tax funds. In future years this wiU not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. FY 93/94 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. That is up $10.67 from the FY 92/93 rate of $29~30. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~rl Use Type Units Ra~ Fac~ A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 224.63 $39.97 2 $79.94 $17,960.00 Single Family Parcel .5799.00 $39.97 1 $39.97 $2~1.790.00 Total $249,750.00 R~solution No. 93-093 Page 11 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 12 SLD2 ANI~EXAT IONS ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED APRIL 1, 1992 TRACT 14486 JUNE 3, 1992 TR 146&& OCTOgER 22, 1992 TR 14192 JANUARY ~0, 1~3 TR 13759 35 AU 8 AU 39 AU 56 AU Resolution No. 93-093 Page 13 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light D'rstrict No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 William .~'Neil, City Engineer Resolution No 93-093 Page 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirefronts of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Stole of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Baeit~round.. Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Eliwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Plmanecl Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #3 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $120,000. In the past, Slate Gas Tax funds have been used to subsidize the eletricity charges in this district. These funds are no longer available and this is the reason for the $52,950 increase in electric utilities over the last fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and mainlain SLD g3 are as follows: Resolution No. 93-093 Page 15 Proposed Msintenance Budset ~or 1993/94 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Deficit Recovery $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,570.00 $123.610.00 $1Z5,180.00 $2.S.910.00 $108,000.00 $184,620.00 $2.290.00 Assessmut Revenue Required: $186,910.00 The most significant impact on the proposed FY 93/94 budget is the increase in electricity costs of over $50,000 to a projected annual cost of over $120,000. In past yeats the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this wtU not be the case and as such will affect the disttict's assessment rate. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 93/94 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94the rate per assessment unit is $47.15. That is up $17.41 from the FY 92/93 rate of $29.74. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I ~ Use Type Units Raa, Fa,,~ A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 97.53 $47.15 2 $94.30 $9,200.00 Single Family Parcel 3769.00 $47.15 1 $47.15 $177.710.00 Total $186,910.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 16 ' I z Resolution No. 93-093 Page 17 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division $ of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Badf,~;'ou.d: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area ot the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Projected Coste The majority of the budgeted costs for $LD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~1 are as follows: Pr~o~d Matrttenance Budget for 1993/94 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Capitai Expenditures: InstaU Signal ~ Terra Vista Pkwy & Church St. Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 92/93 Carryover $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $840.00 $102,000.00 $47.270.00 $2O9,470.00 $21,280.00 $0.00 $21,280.00 $230,750.00 ( $101.800.00~ Assessment Revenue Required: $128,950.00 Anal)'sis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget. However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. $101,800 of the district's fund balance will go towards the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street. 504.79 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 93/94 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $28.96. That is up $1.24 from the FY 92/93 rate of $27.72. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~nd Use T~e Ur~m 1~,, F;~-,r A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 923.38 $28.96 2 $57.92 $53,480.00 Single Family Parcel 2,626.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $75.470.00 Total $128,950.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 19 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 20 SL04 AN~4EXAT ]1~$ ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED APRIL 1, 1992 TRACT 1&365 APRIL 1, 1992 TRACT 13298 NAY 6, 1992 TR 16407 NAY 6, 19~2 TR 1~07-01 &l AU 15.72 AU 116 AU 13 ~U Resolution No. 93-093 Page 21 Annual Engineers Report City' of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Slate of California (I~ndsope and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. $ (SLD #5 is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals ha~ not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. Funds carried over from the 92/93 Fiscal Year will aUow the district to install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency lax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: l~solution No. 93-093 Page 23 Mat.tenance Bu~[get ~or 1993/9~ Ma~e ~ ~a~o~ Con~ ~ices Traffic Si~al Adjus~t $0.~ General ~abili~ ~80.~ Capi~l Expendi~r~: S~t Li~t ~Ha~on El~c U~li~es ~era~o~ a~ Opital Sub~l: ~sm~t Ad~s~a~on ~d ~ ~erh~d Sub~: To~ R~ue R~: ~s: ~ 92/93 ~er f ~s~t R~mue ~ui~: $0.00 $12,780.00 $24,200.00 S27-g30.00 $64,790.00 $9,100.00 $240.00 ' $9,340.00 $74,130.00 $33.610.001 $40,520.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. $24,220 of the district's fund balance will be used to install missing street Lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 93/94 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $,34.60. That is up S1.41 from the FY 92/93 rate of $,3,3.19. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ [~d Use ~ Unim Ram ~ A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1.171.00 S34.60 1 S34.60 $40.520.00 Total 1,171.00 $40,520.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 24 EI I I I I Resolution No. 93-093 Page 25 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No:. 6 (Corninertial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 ' ' Willi~ O Neil, City Engineer Resolution No. 93-093 Page 26 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background.. Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $16,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projecl~l costs to operate and maintain SLD ~ are as follows: Resolution No. 93-093 Page 27 Pr~osed Mainte~ance Budget ~or ~993/94 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Maintenance & Operations Subtotnl: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit Assessment Revenue Required: $7,480.00 S2,500.00 $6,,580.00 $310.00 $16.800.00 $33~70.00 $5,370.00 $5.170.00 $10~540.00 $44,210.00 $3.180.00 ~4_7~.~.00 Analysis: There are no significant increases in the budget. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 7037 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. F~' 93/94 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $,51.40. That is up $20.19 from the FY 92/93 rate of $31.21. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~ Use ~ Units Rale Facinr A.U. Revenue Single Family Acre 921.98 $51.40 1 $51.40 $47_390.00 Total $47,390.00 ...... T ..... ~iT .................. 7 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 28 , I $LD6 ANNEXAT ZONS ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED ANNEXED OCTOBER ?, 1992 DR 89-04 .43 AC OCTOBER ?, 1992 P# 12959-1 18.27 AC NOVENBER 18, 1992 P~N 13~24 30.29 AC DECEMBER Z, 1992 Pie 13224 12.3 AC JANUARY 20, 19~3 C.U.P. 90-18 4.~A¢ FEBRUARY 17, 1993 P~I 14318 3.47 AC Resolution No. 93-093 Page 29 ~solution No. 93-093 Page 30 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No, 7' (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 William~ffNeil, City Engineer Resolution No. 93-093 Page 31 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacir~rour~d: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereo0 on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pn~ected C~ The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~7 are as follows: Resolution No. 93-093 Page 32 Pr~o~d Mat~te~ar~ce Budget for 1993/94 Tolnl Personnel S0.00 Maintenance and Operations S200.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $170.00 Electric Utilities S11.770.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $12,140.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 92/93 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $4,620.00 $4-M0.00 $8,930.00 $21,070.00 <S1.040.00> $20,030.00 There are no sigificant increases in the budget. A fund balance carryover of $1,040.00 is available to keep the as~srn~nt rate the same as last fiscal year. No new a~sessment units have been annexed into the district this year. 93/94 Asseminent Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in th~ assessment rate over the FY 92/93 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ ! ~ L~ Type Unils 1~ F~r~' A.U. R~venue Single Family Parcel 601.00 $33.32 1 $33.32 $20.030.00 Total 601.00 $20,030.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 33 ...... T ............. '~F ....................... T~ Resolution No. 93-093 Page 34 Annual Engineers Repo~ :: City of Rancho:Cucamonga Street: Light District: :"No, 8:: (Sou~h Etiwanda): Fiscal Year' 1993/94: · Resolution No. 93-093 Page 35 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Eftwanda) Fiscal Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Eftwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division $ of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (lmndscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Projected Costin The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projecl~i costs to operate and maintain SLD ~8 are as follows: Resolution No. 93-093 Page 36 Prqposed Mah~tenance Budjet for 1993/94 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit $0.00 $130.00 $0.0O $50.00 't3.860.0O $4,040.0O $720.0O S40.00 $760.0O $4310.0O S2.170.0O ~5,98o.0o AnaLysis: In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD #8. In the FY 93/94, 35 additional parcels were added to the district making a total of 3(2. 35 of these parcels are owned by one company, the developer, Citaticm Homes, Inc. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district this fiscal year, FY 93/94 Assessment Rate:. For FY 93/94 the rate pet assessmant unit is $93.75. That is up $67.44 ;tom the FY 92/93 rate of $126.31. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ iard Use ~ Unit~ lb~ r-a~e A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 36.00 $193.75 I $193.75 $6.980.0O Total 36.00 $6,980.00 Resolution No. 93-093 Page 37