Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004/04/07 - Agenda Packet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Redevelopment Agency · Fire Protection District · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS ,~st and 3rd Wednesdays ~- 7:00 p.m. APRIL 7, 2004 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro lem Rex Gufierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James k. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC cRANcHO UCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. if you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at '10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, c£rancho-cucamonga.ca, us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 1 THE MEETING TO BE HELD In THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C~'~cuo HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE IIA. CALL TO ORDERI 'i. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__. II u. ^mNo c ,MENTSa'm SEmTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation in reco§nition of "National Library Week" and update on Telethon 2004. II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the ¢it¥ Council from addressing any issue not previously included on tho ~onda. The City Council may roeoivo tostimony and ~t th~ mattor for a *u~soqu~nt mootin~. Comment~ are to be limited to five minute, per individual. .. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS lhis i* tho tim~ and place for ropo~ to b~ made b~ mombor~ of th~ Cit~ Council on mattor~ not on th~ a~onda. e. CONSENT CALENDAR I The followin9 Consent Calandar items ara axpaetad to ba routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by tho ~ouneil at one tima without discussion. Any item may bo removed by a Gouneilmambor or member of the audionee for discussion. ~. Approval of Minutes: March ~ 7, 2004 2. Approval of Warrants, Re0ister 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 and Payroll endin9 3/25/2004, for the total amount of $7,454,~ ~4.36. 3. Ap0roval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the adveNisin9 of the "Notice Invitin9 Bids" for improvements in Phase 36 ~B(E) of Community Facilities District 200~-0~, includinO lanOscapin~ and amenities on Arbor Lane between Churoh Street and the noNhorly terminus of Arbor Lane, to be fundeO from Account Number ~ ~ 23035~50/~ 442~ 2-0. r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 2 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY ..**.RANC O HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE ~.~UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-103 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF ARBOR LANE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval to appropriate $178,750 for construction survey services for CFD 2001-01 - Phase 1Bb (north side of Foothill Boulevard west of 44 Day Creek Boulevard, Phase 1Bc (Phase lA Sidewalk & Landscape), Phase 1Bd (Church Street/Etiwanda Avenue Traffic Signal) and Phase 1Be (Arbor Lane Landscaping) to be funded from CFD 2001- 01 funds, Acct. No. 1612303530011442612-0. 5. Approval to authorize a "YES" vote for each city-owned parcel for the 47 Mosquito Control and Disease Prevention Measure by the West Valley Mosquito and Control District. 6. Approval for the purchase of two (2) 2004 Ford Explorers from FriEs Ford of Riverside in the amount of $45,256.38, funded from the Code 55 Enforcement Grant Program (CEGP), Fund. 1244-302-5604. 7. Approval of the purchase of steel pipe and related appurtenances associated with water improvements to be constructed by Phases 57 lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B), of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01, from West Coast Pipe Linings, Inc., for the amount of $116,420.00 and from Inland Water Works Supply Co. for the amount of $49,250.00, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 16123035650/1442612-0 and 16143035650/1442614-0. 8. Approval of a Resolution in support of an Application for Senior 60 Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B Grant Funds for senior services that promote socialization. RESOLUTION NO. 04-104 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION FOR SENIOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR OLDER AMERICAN ACT TITLE III-B GRANT FUNDS FOR SENIOR SERVICES THAT PROMOTE SOCIALIZATION CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 3 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY CRANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 9. Approval of sole source vendor selection for the purchase of pads, 62 supplies, and services for the Vactor Storm Drain truck, Elgin Street Sweepers, and Mobile Street Sweeper from Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona for an annual total not to exceed $35,000 for fiscal year 2003/04, with an option to renew annually after review and confirmation of pricing, for additional one year periods, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1006-303-5250 ($10,000) and 1001- 317-5250 ($25,000). 10. Approval of Grant of Easement between City and Southern California Edison (CO 04-023) which grants Southern California Edison access 66 rights to its podion of the Arbors Electrical Substation located at 8275 Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-105 68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A GRANT OF EASEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON REGARDING THE ARBORS ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 8275 ROCHESTER AVENUE 11. Approval of the purchase of irrigation systems repair parts from M & M Irrigation Supply, Inc., of Corona, in an annual amount not to exceed 69 $75,000 for the period of April 7, 2004 through April 6, 2005, with an option to renew for additional one year periods upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent up to a total of three years, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001-316-5200 ($14,000); 1130-303- 5200 ($6,000); 1131-303-5200 ($8,700); 1133-303-5200 ($7,000); 1134-303-5200 ($9,100); 1136-303-5200 ($1,000); 1137-303-5200 ($4,200); 1140-303-5200 ($1,000); 1700-201-5203 ($4,000); and 1848-303-5200 ($20,000). 12. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 77 for Parcel Map 15948, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Hadwell Corporation, a California Corporation, owner. RESOLUTION NO. 04-106 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15948 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 4 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY [[~,~CHO HALL, 10600 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCA2dONGA 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 88 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B- and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2003- 00869, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by Atlas Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-107 9'1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2003- 00869 RESOLUTION NO. 04-108 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRC2003-00869 14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B '100 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map No. 16033, located on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Blvd., submitted by O & S Holdings, LLC - APN: 0229- 021-62, 63 and 64. RESOLUTION NO. 04-109 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16033, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 04-110 '104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16033 t CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5 g~cHo HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCAMONGA 15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, 111 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract No. 1 6374 located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation - APN Nos: 227-161- 28, 31,33, 35, 36, 38 and 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, 25. RESOLUTION NO. 04-111 1 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16374, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 04-112 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16374 16. Approval of an At-Grade Crossing Agreement (with crossing signal 122 equipment) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) (CO 04- 034) for the proposed widening improvements to the Sixth Street At- Grade Railroad crossing, CPUC Crossing #002-98.10C, located east of Archibald Avenue and west of Lucas Ranch Road, across BNSF's right-of-way designated as MP 98.10, LS 7600, DOT No. 026326R. RESOLUTION NO. 04-113 125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AT-GRADE CROSSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO SIXTH STREET AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, CPUC CROSSING #002-98.10-C, LOCATED EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WEST OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD, ACROSS BNSF'S RIGHT OF WAY, DESIGNATED AS MP 98.10, LS7600, DOT NO. 026326R CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 6 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ~ANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~UCAMONGA 17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 126 execution of the contract in the amount of $74,236.21 to the apparent Iow bidder, Dye and Browning Construction, Inc. (CO 04-022), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,423.62 for the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to north of Almond Street, to be funded from Beautification funds, Acct. No. 11103035650/1436110-0. 18. Approval of an agreement to dedicate an easement for road purposes for Jack Benny Drive through the Edison power corridor to the west of 131 Day Creek Channel, submitted by Southern California Edison on behalf of the developer Guardian Storage Centers (CO-04-023 035). RESOLUTION NO. 04-114 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR DRCDR00-17 19. Approval of a lease agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the West End Family Counseling Services (CO 04- 136 024) to establish an office use within the Norton-Fisher House. RESOLUTION NO. 04-115 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF THE NORTON-FISHER HOUSE AS AN OFFICE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 0227-131-24 20. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 04-025) from Russell L. 156 and Jodi Kay for the property located at 9232 Cottonwood Way (APN: 1062-111-08). RESOLUTION NO. 04-116 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM RUSSELL L. AND JODI KAY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 7 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY C~uNCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UC~MONGA 21. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 159 execution of the contract in the amount of $250,770 to the apparent Iow bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc. (CO 04-026), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $25,077 for the Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1263176-0. 22. Approval and execution of an agreement between San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (CO 04-027) and the City of Rancho 165 Cucamonga for the establishment of responsibilities for the funding to complete the remaining items of repair, design and construction of peripheral work relating to the Route 210 construction. 23. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $193,049.00 to the '167 apparent Iow bidder, Steiny and Company, Inc. (CO 04-028), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,304.90 for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School, to be funded from Transportation funds, Acct. No. 11243035650/1415124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $92,500.00 to Acct. No. 11243035650/1415124-0 from Transportation fund balance. 24. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 15724, 171 located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-117 174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15724 25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16264, 175 located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-118 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16264 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 8 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY cR~u,~ct~o HALL, '~ 0500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 179 Bond, accept a cash surety for maintenance and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2002-00187, submitted by 9101 Center Avenue Associates, located on the west side of Center Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets at 9118 Center Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-119 181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00187 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of 182 Completion for Improvements for DRC2001-00497, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of 6th Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Company. RESOLUTION NO. 04-120 184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00497 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 28. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for '185 improvements for DRC2001-00718, located at 9471 Buffalo Avenue, submitted by Oltmans Constructions Company. RESOLUTION NO. 04-121 '187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00718 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for interior tract improvements 188 for Tract 15814, submitted by Fieldstone Communities Inc., located on the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 C~NCHO HALL, 10500 C~VlC CENTER DRIVE RESOLUTION NO. 04-122 190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE INTERIOR TRACT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 30. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 3419189 in the 191 amount of $313,174 for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, Contract No. 02-050. 31. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. B34219872 in the amount of $31,810.50 for the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb 193 along Summit Trail, south of Summit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and along Hillside Trail, north and south of Hillside Road, west of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02-058. 32. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. UC909600020 in 195 the amount of $191,750.93, for the Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Southwest Corner Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-068. 33. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03-131 as complete, 197 retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $74,189.36. RESOLUTION NO. 04-123 200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 03-131, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CoNsENT O ,NANCES I lhe following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial, lhe Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be No Items Submitted. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APmL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 10 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY R-~NCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE (~UCAMONGA G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS [ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 201 ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - JAMES A. MARTIN JR. - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 04-124 308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 AND THE ISSUANCE OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GAS STATION WITH PUMP ISLAND CANOPY AND A SINGLE BUILDING CONTAINING A 2.947 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE AND 2,504 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON 1.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1089-121-08 AND 1089-401-66. 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 312 GRANT DRAFT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005- A review of the federally-required Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,180,000. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 11 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY (][~M~CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCA~ONGA H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. I. CITVmNAGE.'S STAFF O.TS I The following iteme do not legally requiro any public testimony, although the Chair may open tho moeting for public input, 1. CITY MANAGER - BUDGET UPDATE - IOral Report) J. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requeated by the City Council for discussion. Thoy aro not public hearing itoms, although tho Chair may open tho m~ting for publi~ input. 1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral 2. COHSIDE~ATION OF LIBRARY SUBCOMMI~EE'S 353 RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW BOARD MEMBER K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the tim~ for City Council to identi~ the items thoy wish to discuss at the next meeting. Thcs, it, ms will not be discussed at this m~ting, only identified for th* n~xt m~ting. _~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APmL 7, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 12 THE MEETING TO BE HELD iN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY cR~',rc~o HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April t, 2004, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Mamh 17, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES II A. C LTOO E. I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. 31. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF 1-15, GARY SAFADY, O&S HOLDINGS, AND JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT - CITY 32. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF 19TM STREET AND SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 210, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BRAD BULLER, CITY PLANNER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT - CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SES~ No communication was made on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. The closed session recessed at 6:50 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meeting II ^. I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linde D. Daniels, RDA Director; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Martindale, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Deputy Chief Bob Corcoran and Battalion Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; end Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. II ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Presentation of Cedificates of Recognition and awards to the winners of the City's "Spay Day USA" coloring contest. Mayor Alexander, assisted by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, presented the Certificates of Recognition to the winners of the contest. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of"American Red Cross Month." Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Boardmember Debra Hippen. [[ C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C1. John Shanahan, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, felt people were taking "politically correct" too seriously. He talked about the Oklahoma bombing disaster and felt people were not being told all the facts about this. He continued to report about several websites where information could be found. City Council Minutes Mamh 17, 2004 Page 3 C2. Nicole Myerchin thanked Councilmembers Gutierrez and Howdyshell for working as the subcommittee supporting the "no kill animal shelter." She thanked everyone involved with the "Spay Day USA" program. She added there are some services the County provides that she does not approve of. She stated she will be working on a new proposal for the County contract, which she felt, would save the City money and would be more efficient. [[ D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I D1. Councilmember Kurth mentioned the West Valley Vector Control Ballot Measure that was sent through the mail. He stated he feels this is a good thing and hoped people would vote for it. He told how beautiful the new fire station is that was just dedicated on East Avenue. He commented on the fire fighters that recently retired that received the recognition tonight, and mentioned the great job the fire fighters did during the Grand Prix Fire. He added he has spoken before the Lions Club and the Kiwanis Club about Central Park and the Mall and that he is always willing to do this. D2. Councilmember Williams commented on the new fire station on East Avenue in Etiwanda, and commented it has a community room that is available to the public. She stated she participated in Arbor Day activities last week and enjoyed it very much. She stated that she and other elected officials were at the Mills Mall last Saturday asking people to sign petitions to get a measure on the ballot which will save City revenues from being taken by the State and urged people to sign the petition when approached. She stated people can call her at City Hall or at 980-6336 if they would like to help with this effort. D3. Councilmember Gutierrez welcomed the students that were visiting tonight and he also welcomed Steven Jones and his son who were also visiting. He stated the City is working on controlling the blowing dust as a result of the winds. He thanked people for their patience with traffic delays as a result of street construction. He asked people to watch their speed while driving. He asked everyone to be good neighbors and to be considerate of each other. He thanked those people and businesses that helped his students so they were able to go to Washington, D.C. and New York, and he stated the City is committed to working on the "no kill animal shelter" issue, and that the City remains committed. D4. Councilmember Howdyshell wished everyone a Happy St. Patrick's Day. He stated he appreciates Nicole Myerchin's passion for animals. He stated he reported some illegal dumping to Captain Ortiz and Joe O'Neil and thanked them for their assistance. D5. Mayor Alexander stated he heard the Air Force Band at Los Osos High School and how fabulous it was. He welcomed Little League season again and wished them all good luck. He congratulated Douglas Bramlet for becoming an Eagle Scout and told what a wonderful young man he is. II E. CONSENT CALENDAR I El. Approval of Minutes: February 18, 2004 (Alexander absent) March 3, 2004 (Howdyshell absent) E2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. February 26 through March 5, 2004, and Payroll ending March 5, 2004, for the total amount of $2,455,275.78. E3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 29, 2004. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 4 E4. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract (CO 04-021) in the amount of $116,666.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Sadie Construction, Inc, of Atwood, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 6% contingency in the amount of $6,999.96 (to equal a total of $123,665.96) for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2 from the Capital Reserve Account 1025001-5300. E5. Approval for annual product suppod and subscription service renewal from the sole-source provider, Oracle, in the amount of $55,524 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division Account 1001209-5300 and 1001209-5152. E6. Approval of a Map for Parcel Map 15948, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Hartwell Corporation, a California Corporation, owner. RESOLUTION NO. 04-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15948 E7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, between Foudh and Sixth Streets, submitted by Calwest Industrial Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PROJECT DRC2003-00072 E8. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 16612 located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street submitted by D. R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.- APN: 227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. RESOLUTION NO. 04-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16612, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 04-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16612 E9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for DRC2002-00519, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway northbound on ramp, submitted by Fountainhead Delta, LP. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 04-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00519 RESOLUTION NO. 04-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR DRC2002100519 El0. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16245, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Jefferson on Fourth, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 04-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16245, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 04-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16245 Ell. Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DRC2003-00492, located on the south side of Lemon Avenue, approximately 715 feet west of Haven Avenue, submitted by the William Fox Group, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2003-00492 E12. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for Traffic Signal Modifications and Striping at Arrow Route and Grove Avenue relating to Tract 16309, a development in the City of Upland. RESOLUTION NO. 04-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16309 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 6 E13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 14523, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by MBK Homes, Ltd. RESOLUTION NO. 04~087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14523 E14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 15783, located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & D Construction, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15783 E15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 14498, located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14498 E16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 15838, located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15838 E17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Landscape Irrigation, Landscaping Improvements and Street Improvements Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and File a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 15540, submitted by VanDaele Development Corporation, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, east of Baker Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15540 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E18. Approval to accept the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03- 047, as complete, approval to appropriate $3,105.54 to Account No. 11763035850/1418176-0 from Measure I fund balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $144,046.34. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 04-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 03- 047, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E19. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 929 1828-34 in the amount of $157,050.00, for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive, Contract No. 01 ~077. E20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14120-2, located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC. E21. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 15536, located on the south side of Fifth Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Fairway Palms, LLC. E22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 8548580 in the amount of $251,050.23, for the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' north of Church Street to 500' north of Base Line Road, Contract No. 02-013. E23. Approval to accept Phase I-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $6,134,192.46. RESOLUTION NO. 04-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE I-A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 02-075 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E24. Approval of financing documents for the issuance of 2004 tax allocation bonds related to the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Program. RESOLUTION NO. 04-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS E25. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 04-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING iTS INTENSION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO E26. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Report and setting of public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 04-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING AND TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO E27. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Reports and setting of the public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 04-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 9 Il P. CONSENT ORDINANCES I No items submitted. II G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS [ Gl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to subdivide a 3.33 acre properly into 16 single-family lots in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-741-64 and 0202-751-36 and 37. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Jason Hoover stated Beryl is not a straight street, that it is a street with several jogs in it. He stated the street is only 59' wide and should be 66' wide. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated what Mr. Hoover is referring to is the east side of the street, which is not part of this project. He stated there is a jog, but felt the street works well and if there was a problem in front of his property, Mr. Hoover should have it fixed himself. He stated there are no other traffic problems. Mr. Hoover stated the plans do not reflect the correct information about the street width and felt this should be fixed. Mayor Alexander asked again if there were any problems or hazard with the street. Joe O'Nei~, City Engineer, stated no. Mr. Hoover stated he also had concerns with the traffic flow. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer stated with the improvements on the west side of the street, it will improve it. He stated Mr. Hoover is able to make more improvements to the street in front of his property if he wants to. Charles Joseph, Charles Joseph Associates, stated he has spoken to Mr. Hoover and has tried to address his concerns. He stated there was a neighborhood meeting, but that Mr. Hoover was not able to attend. He stated quite a few people were in attendance. Mr. Buquet stated the project meets the requirements of the City. He did not feel Mr. Hoover is offering anything new to the Council that was not already submitted to the Planning Commission. He did not feel this project would have an impact on Mr. Hoover's property. He felt this project will help the area and asked the Council to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Howdyshell asked about the size of the lots and asked if this issue has been worked out. Mr. Buquet stated yes it has and that the City's requirements have been met. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 10 Councilmember Kurth stated he supports the Planning Commission and staff's recommendation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 3.33 ACRES OF LAND INTO 16 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL STREET BE'FWEEN MIGNONETTE STREET AND CIELITO STREET - APN: 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 AND 37 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 04-101. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. No items submitted. [I I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I No items submitted. II J. COUNCIL BUSINESS I J1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE ACTION: Report received and filed. l[ K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING [ K1. Mayor Alexander stated he would like an update on the mall project in the near future. · City Council Minutes March 17, 2004 Page 11 L1. John Gostomski, Skyline Road, stated he has previously spoken to the Council about his concerns with flood control for his area. He thanked the City for their work during the last rainstorm. He stated there is trespassing going on as a result of the fire. He stated there are too many vehicles allowed to go into Cucamonga Canyon and then they go through the Skyline neighborhood on their way out. He asked that signage be put up to keep motorcycles out. Mayor Alexander suggested he meet with Captain Pete Odiz of the Police Department. ][ M. ADJOURNMENT Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is requested by Bond Counsel to reconvene the Redevelopment Agency so that an oral report can be given on item D4, and for the City Council to adjourn. MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve the City Manager's recommendation as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207724 3/9/2004 CMTA 35.00 AP- 00207726 3/10/2004 ABLAC 270.29 AP - 00207727 3/10/2004 ABLETRONICS 24.93 AP- 00207727 3/10/2004 ABLETRONICS 7.74 AP- 00207728 3/10/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 331.14 AP - 00207729 3/10/2004 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 13,267.20 AP - 00207729 3/10/2004 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 108.~3 AP - 00207731 3/10/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 136.44 AP - 00207732 3/10/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 179.00 AP- 00207732 3/10/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 618.00 AP- 00207733 3/10/2004 ARCH WIRELESS 1,286.39 AP - 00207734 3/10/2004 ARCHITECTURE ONE 3,948.00 AP- 00207735 3/10/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 15,656.00 AP- 00207736 3/10/2004 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.58 AP- 00207737 3/10/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 15,920.00 AP - 00207737 3/10/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,540.00 AP - 00207737 3/10/2004 AUFBAU CORPORATION 18,722.00 AP- 00207739 3/10/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 114.00 AP - 00207739 3/10/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 700.50 AP - 00207740 3/10/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 121.22 AP - 00207740 3/10/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 24.73 AP - 00207740 3/10/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 203.40 AP - 00207740 3/10/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 108.90 AP - 00207740 3/10/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 291.10 AP - 00207741 3/10/2004 BAKER, SHARI 600.00 AP - 00207742 3/10/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 252.61 AP - 00207742 3/10/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE -239.82 AP - 00207742 3/10/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 457.60 AP- 00207742 3/10/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 739.32 AP - 00207744 3/10/2004 BAUDVILLE 22.90 AP- 00207745 3/10/2004 BEE REMOVERS 435.00 AP- 00207748 3/10/2004 BISHOP COMPANY 42.95 AP- 00207749 3/10/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 6.47 AP- 00207749 3/10/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 773.86 AP - 00207750 3/10/2004 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES INC, MICHAEL 11,935.32 AP-00207751 3/10/2004 BRODARTBOOKS 1,060.55 AP- 00207751 3/10/2004 BRODARTBOOKS 37.49 AP - 00207753 3/10/2004 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 354.45 AP - 00207754 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVESTMENT ADVISORY 475.00 AP - 00207755 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00207755 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHiSE TAX BOARD 43.31 AP - 00207755 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHiSE TAX BOARD 22.50 AP - 00207756 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 150.00 AP ~ 00207757 3/10/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,426.02 AP- 00207758 3/10/2004 CALSENSE 1,104.46 AP- 00207759 3/10/2004 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 361.57 AP - 00207760 3/10/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 35.56 AP - 00207760 3/10/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 592.27 AP - 00207760 3/10/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 100.32 AP - 00207760 3/10/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 278.97 AP - 00207760 3/10/2004 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 551.36 AP - 00207761 3/10/2004 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 5,000.00 AP - 00207762 3/10/2004 CHAIq~EY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 538.40 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~ 17:04:3 .Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00207763 3/10/2004 COLE, NINA 17.65 AP- 00207765 3/10/2004 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 205.57 AP - 00207765 3/10/2004 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 205.57 AP - 00207766 3/10/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 274.00 AP - 00207766 3/10/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 63.00 AP - 00207766 3/10/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 73.00 AP - 00207766 3/10/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 84.55 AP - 00207767 3/10/20~4 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 560.30 AP - 00207767 3/10/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ! 956.28 AP - 00207767 3/10/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 113.17 AP - 00207768 3/10/2004 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 969.75 AP - 00207769 3/10/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00207769 3/10/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.98 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.13 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.23 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.78 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.88 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.94 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.13 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.98 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.08 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.88 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200.98 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.83 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.88 AP - 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.53 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.43 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.23 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 370.63 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.43 AP 00207771 3/10/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.68 AP 00207773 3/10/2004 D AND B VISIONS 175.00 AP 00207774 3/10/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 301.17 AP - 00207774 3/10/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 209.04 AP- 00207775 3/10/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 46,617.50 AP - 00207775 3/10/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 37,500.00 AP - 00207775 3/10/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 20,705.00 AP 00207775 3/10/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 17,950.00 AP 00207777 3/10/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 891.33 AP 00207777 3/10/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 76.95 AP 00207778 3/10/2004 D1ETERICH POST COMPANY 359.85 AP 00207779 3/10/2004 DIRECTV 66.44 AP 00207780 3/10/2004 DUGAN, ALLISON 1,224.00 AP 00207781 3/10/2004 ECOLAB INC. 1,716.48 AP 00207782 3/10/2004 EFTYCHIOU, AUDREY 583.90 AP - 00207783 3/10/2004 EGGERS, BOB 474.00 AP - 00207784 3/10/2004 ENR 82.00 AP - 00207785 3/10/2004 ESRI INC 2,550.00 AP- 00207786 3/t0/2004 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 752.50 AP- 00207786 3/10/2004 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 980.00 AP ~ 00207787 3/10/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 66.81 AP - 00207787 3/10/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 207.85 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207787 3/10/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 64.59 AP - 00207788 3/10/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.89 AP - 00207788 3/10/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.22 AP - 00207788 3/10/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 33.42 AP- 00207789 3/10/2004 FEDERAL JOBS DIGEST 112.50 AP - 00207790 3/10/2004 FILARSKY AND WATT 2,646.93 AP - 00207791 3/10/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00207791 3/10/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00207791 3/10/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00207792 3/10/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 73.92 AP - 00207793 3/10/2004 FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 79.00 AP - 00207794 3/10/2004 FLEET GLASS 244.80 AP - 00207795 3/10/2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00 AP - 00207795 3/10/2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00 AP - 00207795 3/10/2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00 AP - 00207796 3/10/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC 872.81 AP - 00207796 3/10/2004 FORD OF UPLAND INC 34.48 AP - 00207798 3/10/2004 G & D CONSTRUCTION INC 66,860.50 AP - 00207799 3/10/2004 GAIL MATERIALS 175.05 AP - 00207799 3/10/2004 GAIL MATERIALS 55.10 AP- 00207800 3/10/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 28.50 AP - 00207800 3/10/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 21.00 AP - 00207801 3/10/2004 GEOGRAPHICS 73.27 AP- 00207802 3/10/2004 GRESSCOLTD 2,381.55 AP - 00207803 3/10/2004 GRUENEICH RESOURCE ADVOCATES 1,971.20 AP- 00207804 3/10/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 216.03 AP- 00207805 3/10/2004 HARBOUR, DELVIN 367.00 AP - 00207806 3/10/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00207807 3/10/2004 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 91.23 AP - 00207808 3/10/2004 HI WAY SAFETY INC 295.50 AP - 00207809 3/10/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 203.92 AP - 00207809 3/10/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 33.41 AP - 00207809 3/10/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 35.27 AP - 00207809 3/10/2004 HOLLiDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00 AP - 00207809 3/10/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 245.94 AP - 00207810 3/10/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 91.44 AP - 00207810 3/10/2004 I-IOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5.38 AP - 00207810 3/10/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 274.95 AP - 00207810 3/10/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 298.64 AP - 00207811 3/10/2004 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 532.00 AP - 00207811 3/10/2004 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 532.00 AP - 00207811 3/10/2004 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 532.00 AP- 00207812 3/10/2004 HOSE MAN INC 176.30 AP- 00207813 3/10/2004 HOUSE OFRUTH 633.00 AP- 00207813 3/10/2004 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP - 00207813 3/10/2004 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP - 00207815 3/10/2004 HUANG, PRUDENCE 2,475.00 AP- 00207816 3/10/2004 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP- 00207817 3/10/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 135.09 AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 552.30 AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 573.30 AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 106.05 AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 191.10 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 602.70 AP - 00207820 3/t0/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 91.35 AP - 00207820 3/10/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 423.15 AP - 00207821 3/10/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 44.35 AP-00207821 3/10/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 39.31 AP - 00207822 3/10/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 51.72 AP- 00207823 3/10/2004 J J ROOFING 42.00 AP - 00207824 3/10/2004 JONES, BOB 2,560.00 AP - 00207825 3/10/2004 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 58.I 3 AP - 00207826 3/10/2004 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 53.63 AP - 00207826 3/10/2004 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 60.06 AP - 00207827 3/10/2004 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 153.67 AP-00207828 3/10/2004 KSPAAM 2,154.28 AP - 00207830 3/10/2004 LEIIq~ER, LUKAS 148.50 AP - 00207832 3/10/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00 AP - 00207834 3/10/2004 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00207835 3/10/2004 M C I WORLDCOM 675.28 AP - 00207836 3/10/2004 MAISELLES HOME FURNISHINGS 762.32 AP- 00207838 3/10/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 43.54 AP - 00207839 3/10/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 108.34 AP - 00207841 3/10/2004 McDANIEL, SANDY 200.00 AP - 00207842 3/10/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 428.85 AP - 00207842 3/10/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00207842 3/10/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP- 00207843 3/10/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 187.91 AP - 00207843 3/10/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 45.97 AP - 00207843 3/i0/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 130.91 AP - 00207843 3/10/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 157.92 AP-00207843 3/10/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 301.85 AP-00207843 3/t0/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 127.91 AP - 00207844 3/i0/2004 MMASC 50.00 AP - 00207847 3/10/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 275.27 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 46.69 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 71.79 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 413.39 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12.92 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 42.35 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 20.55 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 132.79 AP- 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPAAUTO PARTS 78.12 AP - 00207848 3/10/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 127.27 AP - 00207849 3/10/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,262.03 AP - 00207850 3/10/2004 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 385.00 AP- 00207851 3/10/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 167.76 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 548.71 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 180.81 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 107.32 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 46.22 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 467.64 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 84.94 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 87.57 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 139.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 03/29/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, t 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 100.10 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 2,620.09 AP - 00207853 3/10/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 1,149.92 AP- 00207854 3/10/2004 OCLC INC 55.07 AP - 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.93 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 29.10 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 34.10 AP - 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 59.26 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 247.76 AP - 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 6.36 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.73 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 64.55 AP - 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.60 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 9.75 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 62.33 AP - 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 24.06 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -37.14 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 104.42 AP- 00207855 3/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -29.10 AP- 00207857 3/10/2004 P A P A 165.00 AP- 00207858 3/10/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 107.75 AP- 00207858 3/10/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 32.33 AP- 00207858 3/10/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 474.10 AP- 00207859 3/10/2004 PARKER DIRECTORY 75.86 AP - 00207860 3/10/2004 PARSAC 50.00 AP - 00207861 3/I0/2004 PERFORMANCE INSTITUTE, THE 1,095.00 AP- 00207862 3/10/2004 PMI 982.36 AP - 00207863 3/10/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,707.59 AP - 00207863 3/10/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 5,567.15 AP - 00207864 3/10/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 237.79 AP - 00207865 3/10/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 170.25 AP - 00207866 3/10/2004 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP- 00207867 3/10/2004 QWEST 1.36 AP - 00207869 3/10/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00 AP - 00207869 3/10/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP- 00207872 3/10/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 143.30 AP - 00207872 3/10/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 137.37 AP - 00207873 3/10/2004 RE1NHARDT, RITA 648.00 AP - 00207874 3/10/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00207875 3/10/2004 REXEL CALCON 765.03 AP - 00207876 3/10/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 28.00 AP - 00207876 3/10/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,392.00 AP - 00207877 3/10/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 8.94 AP - 00207878 3/10/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00207879 3/10/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 792.00 AP - 00207880 3/10/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 82.43 AP - 00207880 3/10/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 32.75 AP - 00207881 3/10/2004- SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 110.00 AP - 00207882 3/10/2004 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 15.00 AP- 00207883 3/10/2004 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 1,161.29 AP - 00207886 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 110.00 AP - 00207887 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 601.00 AP - 00207888 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 92,075.00 Use~'~H~WoR~H - Ann ~Iaworth ....... Page: } ........... Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~5 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207889 ' 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4,677.50 AP - 00207890 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 233.50 AP - 00207891 3/10/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.00 AP - 00207892 3/10/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 254.29 AP - 00207892 3/10/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99 AP - 00207892 3/10/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 254.29 AP - 00207893 3/10/2004 SARES REGIS GROUP 341.60 AP- 00207894 3/10/2004 SBC 55.23 AP- 00207894 3/10/2004 SBC 55.23 AP - 00207895 3/10/2004 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 7.20 AP - 00207896 3/10/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 115.00 AP- 00207897 3/10/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 78.01 AP- 00207898 3/10/2004 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP - 00207899 3/10/2004 SMITH MANUFACTURING COMPANY 205.75 AP- 00207901 3/10/2004 SORCINI, EMMA 403.50 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,274.13 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,985.48 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.84 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.62 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 172.54 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.64 AP - 00207906 3/i0/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.49 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 238.28 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.07 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.12 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 445.65 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.06 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.57 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.49 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.95 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.12 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.91 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.69 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.64 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.54 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.46 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIEORNIA EDISON 124.67 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.84 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.89 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,057.75 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.61 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC ~ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.78 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.78 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.86 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.57 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.48 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.24 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.15 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 187.53 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.47 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,401.39 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.59 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.46 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.59 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.41 AP ~ 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.11 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.63 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,830.96 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.34 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 11,990.26 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.06 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.88 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.16 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.34 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.37 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.92 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.30 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.74 AP 00207906 3/10/~2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.55 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.04 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29 AP 00207906 3/t0/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.25 AP 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.55 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:7 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 171.00 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.55 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.01 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.85 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.70 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.87 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.43 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.27 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.92 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.01 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.80 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.88 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.21 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.26 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.45 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.38 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.35 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.61 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.89 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,092.73 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.44 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.97 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.69 AP- 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.71 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.22 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.53 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18,559.31 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,213.21 AP - 00207906 3/10/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,016.34 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time::t'~, 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207907 3/10/2004 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 664.00 AP - 00207909 3/10/2004 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 165.63 AP 00207909 3/10/2004 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 227.75 AP 00207909 3/10/2004 STEP, LING COFFEE SERVICE 120.04 AP 00207909 3/10/2004 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 36.70 AP 00207909 3/10/2004 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 29.50 AP 00207910 3/10/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP 00207912 3/10/2004 SUNRISE FORD 39.01 AP- 00207913 3/10/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 313.00 AP- 00207913 3/10/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 86.19 AP - 00207914 3/10/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 5,411.16 AP - 00207915 3/10/20(}4 THREADED EMBROIDERY & SCREEN PRINTIN( 1,277.92 AP - 00207916 3/10/2004 TIM~ WARNER TELECOM 1,282.20 AP - 00207918 3/10/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,045.00 AP- 00207919 3/10/2004 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 8,000.00 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.47 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 52.69 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 107.25 AP- 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 531.93 AP- 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFII<ST UNIFORM SERVICE 588.61 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 208.59 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.65 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.05 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.47 AP - 00207920 3/10/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.65 AP- 00207922 3/10/2004 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 651.81 AP- 00207923 3/10/2004 UNITED WAY 588.32 AP- 00207924 3/10/2004 UPS 17.06 AP- 00207925 3/10/2004 US POSTMASTER 335.11 AP - 00207926 3/10/2004 US POSTMASTER 150.00 AP - 00207927 3/10/2004 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 32.45 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 82.74 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 42.54 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 570.62 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 205.43 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 413.58 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 27.53 AP ~ 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 91.59 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 30.17 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 28.74 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 58.53 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 33.71 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 91.59 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.79 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 28.73 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~l, 17:04:3 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 tl~ough 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 319.49 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.34 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 27.53 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 56.49 AP-00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 21.29 AP- 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 131.87 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 47.06 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 47.06 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 29.74 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 28.03 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 385.65 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 36.90 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 45.40 AP - 00207929 3/10/2004 VERIZON 60.35 AP- 00207930 3/10/2004 VERIZON 1,155.28 AP - 00207931 3/10/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP - 00207932 3/10/2004 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP- 00207933 3/10/2004 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00207934 3/t0/2004 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 32.10 AP - 00207935 3/10/2004 WARD, DESIREE 525.00 AP- 00207936 3/10/2004 WAXiE SANITARY SUPPLY 28.81 AP- 00207936 3/10/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 322.23 AP- 00207937 3/10/2004 WEST GROUP 167.05 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 107.25 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 154.44 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 73.26 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 377.19 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 332.97 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 122.98 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 8.58 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 29.70 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 117.04 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 141.02 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 107.14 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 58.30 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 175.23 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 134.64 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 12.87 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 482.46 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 462.99 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 788.04 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 851.07 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 446.82 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 555.39 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 374.88 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 497.31 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 445.17 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 587.07 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 344.85 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 439.23 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 1,004.19 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 789.46 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ A 17:04:3 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 61.16 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 13.20 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 47.74 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 33.00 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY IVlRF LLC 85.14 AP- 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 187.44 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MI~ LLC 194.04 AP - 00207939 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 227.70 AP - 00207939 3/i0/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 190.74 AP - 00207940 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 20,000.00 AP ~ 00207940 3/10/2004 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 6,595.25 AP - 00207941 3/10/2004 WF CONSTRUCTION 140.00 AP - 00207943 3/10/2004 WILSON COMPANY, THE H W 144.08 AP - 00207944 3/10/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP- 00207944 3/10/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 33.92 AP - 00207944 3/10/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 10,594.45 AP- 00207945 3/10/2004 YORK INDUSTRIES 242.05 AP - 00207947 3/10/2004 ARROW GLEN COLLISION CENTER 841.94 AP - 00207948 3/15/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,620.00 AP - 00207949 3/17/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 4.73 AP - 00207949 3/17/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 20.06 AP - 00207949 3/17/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 20.92 AP - 00207950 3/17/2004 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 6,877.02 AP - 00207951 3/17/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 136.52 AP - 00207951 3/17/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 125.97 AP - 00207951 3/17/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 145.46 AP - 00207951 3/17/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 31.74 AP- 00207952 3/17/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 25.86 AP- 00207952 3/17/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 8.62 AP- 00207952 3/17/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 8.62 AP-00207953 3/17/2004 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00207954 3/17/2004 ADVANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 700.00 AP ~ 00207954 3/17/2004 ADVANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 24,097.22 AP- 00207956 3/17/2004 ALLWELDING 195.00 AP - 00207957 3/17/2004 APG COMPANY 840.00 AP - 00207958 3/17/2004 APHRCK LLC 1,000.00 AP - 00207960 3/17/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,008.00 AP - 00207960 3/17/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,152.00 AP 00207960 3/17/2004 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 4,160.00 AP 00207961 3/17/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 3,361.71 AP 00207961 3/17/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 371.13 AP 00207962 3/17/2004 ASSISECURITY 135.00 AP 00207964 3/17/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 159.47 AP 00207964 3/17/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 191.51 AP 00207964 3/17/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 40.48 AP 00207964 3/17/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 213.35 AP 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHARTINC 364,611.68 AP 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHART INC 438,528.69 AP 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHART INC -45,895.91 AP 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHART INC -14,121.81 AP- 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHART INC -38,835.00 AP - 00207965 3/17/2004 BARNHART INC 137,037.22 AP - 00207968 3/17/2004 BOYLE ENGINEERING 846.90 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ / 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207968 3/17/2004 BOYLE ENGINEERING 5,423.50 AP - 00207968 3/17/2004 BOYLE ENGINEERING 5,345.95 AP- 00207969 3/17/2004 BRYANT, GERRI IRIS 125.00 AP - 00207970 3/17/2004 BUCKNAM AND ASSOCIATES 630.00 AP - 00207971 3/17/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,060.00 AP - 00207972 3/17/2004 CALTAC 40.00 AP - 00207973 3/17/2004 CARR, PAM 53.00 AP - 00207974 3/17/2004 CARRIAGE ESTATES II LLC 1,000.00 AP ~ 00207976 3/17/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 359.00 AP - 00207976 3/17/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 852.00 AP- 00207976 3/17/2004 CHARTER MEDIA 657.00 AP- 00207977 3/17/2004 CNEVRON USA INC 183.99 AP - 00207978 3/17/2004 CITY RENTALS 39.60 AP - 00207978 3/17/2004 CITY RENTALS 450.36 AP - 00207979 3/17/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00207980 3/17/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 646.82 AP - 00207981 3/17/2004 CMTA 2004 CONFERENCE 265.00 AP - 00207982 3/17/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 25.86 AP - 00207982 3/17/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 5.24 AP- 00207984 3/17/2004 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 808.13 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.68 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,579.18 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.28 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.68 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248.41 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 890.93 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 286.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 300.13 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.98 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 321.13 AP ~ 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.33 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.33 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.33 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.18 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 235.33 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248.53 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.23 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.58 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.93 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 299.03 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.08 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.68 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 459.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.33 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.88 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 84.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 313.43 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 274.93 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 03/29/20(; Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:.. t7:04:3 12. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 360.73 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 387.03 AP - 00207986 3/17/201M CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 404.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.23 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 590.93 AP ~ 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.63 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 406.83 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 604.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 264.93 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41.93 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.33 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 448.63 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.23 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 456.43 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 10.03 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.63 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 325.33 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 323.23 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80 AP 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGAVALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.13 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 84.88 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,188.93 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.88 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.93 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.63 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 450.83 AP - 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 256.13 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 415.63 AP- 00207986 3/17/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.63 AP - 00207987 3/17/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,450.00 AP- 00207987 3/17/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,450.00 AP - 00207988 3/17/2004 D A R E AMERICA MERCHANDISE 1,090.30 AP - 00207989 3/17/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 54,853.75 AP - 00207990 3/17/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 157.31 AP - 00207990 3/17/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,188.44 AP - 00207991 3/17/2004 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00207992 3/17/2004 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 31.50 AP - 00207993 3/17/2004 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP - 00207993 3/17/2004 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP- 00207994 3/17/2004 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 371.16 AP - 00207994 3/17/2004 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 341.i6 AP - 00207995 3/17/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 175.51 AP - 00207995 3/17/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 163.00 AP - 00207996 3/17/2004 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,217.58 AP - 00207997 3/17/2004 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 371.94 AP - 00207998 3/17/2004 ENTERTAINMENT DESIGN 27.99 AP - 00207998 3/17/2004 ENTERTAINMENT DESIGN 0.06 AP - 00207999 3/17/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 50.00 AP - 00208000 3/17/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 332.37 AP - 00208000 3/17/2004 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 153.99 AP - 00208001 3/17/2004 EZ RENTALS 189.36 AP- 00208002 3/17/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 185.79 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 ---- -- Current Da-t;:- 03~)20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208002 3/17/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.21 AP - 00208002 3/17/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.21 AP - 00208002 3/17/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10.87 AP - 00208002 3/17/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.87 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 184.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 303.60 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 364.50 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 228.00 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 291.80 AP - 00208003 3/17/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 184.00 AP - 00208006 3/17/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 39.60 AP - 00208006 3/17/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 3,772.40 AP - 00208008 3/17/2004 FORD PRINTING AND MAILING INC 1,145.58 AP- 00208009 3/17/2004 GADABOUT TOURS INC 2,961.00 AP - 00208012 3/17/2004 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS 407.00 AP- 00208013 3/17/2004 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 95.88 AP- 00208014 3/17/2004 HADDOCK, RAMONA 95.00 AP- 00208015 3/17/2004 HALL, IENNI 41.00 AP- 00208016 3/17/2004 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 735.13 AP - 00208017 3/17/2004 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 914.26 AP- 00208018 3/17/2004 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 61.75 AP- 00208019 3/17/2004 HOLIDAY PRINTING 4,521.57 AP- 00208019 3/17/2004 HOLIDAY PRINTING 18,811.09 AP- 00208020 3/17/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 36.53 AP - 00208020 3/17/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 32.46 AP- 00208021 3/17/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 53.34 AP- 00208021 3/17/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 129.86 AP- 00208021 3/17/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 97.68 AP - 00208022 3/17/2004 HOOPER, ALISON 2,000.00 AP - 00208022 3/17/2004 HOOPER, ALISON 750.00 AP- 00208023 3/17/2004 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP- 00208024 3/17/2004 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 143.08 AP - 00208025 3/17/2004 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 3,362.50 AP- 00208026 3/17/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 4.81 AP - 00208026 3/17/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 60.48 AP - 00208026 3/17/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 26.89 AP - 00208026 3/17/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC -5.39 AP - 00208027 3/17/2004 IGNACIO, MYLAN 200.00 AP - 00208028 3/17/2004 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 565.00 AP - 00208029 3/17/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 86.40 AP - 00208029 3/17/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 86.40 AP - 00208029 3/17/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 86.40 AP - 00208029 3/17/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 86.40 AP - 00208030 3/17/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 120.86 AP - 00208030 3/17/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 249.98 AP - 00208031 3/17/2004 JACKSON HIRSH INC 299.00 AP - 00208032 3/17/2004 JOHNSON, ETHEL 6.00 AP - 00208033 3/17/2004 JT STORM DEVELOPMENT NO 2, LLC 500.00 AP - 00208034 3/17/2004 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,495.03 User: AHAWORTH - Ann H~wo~th --- Page: 14 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel j /17:04:3 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208035 3/17/2004 KEITH, CHERYL 100.00 AP- 00208036 3/17/2004 KLAUS AND SONS 335.00 AP - 00208037 3/17/2004 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 4,800.00 AP - 00208038 3/17/2004 KUBEC, HARRY 6.00 AP - 00208039 3/17/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 3,569.03 AP- 00208039 3/17/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 32,482.33 AP - 00208040 3/17/2004 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 70.00 AP - 00208040 3/17/2004 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 70.00 AP ~ 00208041 3/17/2004 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 144.00 AP- 00208042 3/17/2004 LEII~Ft~R, LUKAS 148.50 AP - 00208043 3/17/2004 LENNAR HOMES INLAND DIVISION 500.00 AP - 00208044 3/17/2004 LETS STOR IT 65.00 AP - 00208045 3/17/2004 LEWIS INVESTMENTS 5,727.00 AP - 00208046 3/17/2004 LEWIS INVESTMENTS 5,579.76 AP- 00208047 3/17/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 287.00 AP- 00208047 3/17/2004 LILBURN CORPORATION 10,938.40 AP - 00208048 3/17/2004 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 3,500.00 AP - 00208048 3/17/2004 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 95.00 AP - 00208049 3/17/2004 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 351.06 AP- 00208051 3/17/2004 MAIN STREET SIGNS 328.64 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARiPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MAR[POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 313.37 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 691.55 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,718.70 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06 AP- 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,631.13 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 737.24 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,282.99 AP - 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,845.19 AP- 00208052 3/17/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,614.83 AP - 00208053 3/17/2004 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00208054 3/17/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 23.51 AP - 00208054 3/17/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 163.90 AP - 00208054 3/17/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY -20.07 AP- 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 182.15 AP- 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART -144.50 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART -144.50 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 72.25 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 150.09 AP - 00208055 3/17/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 72.25 AP- 00208056 3/17/2004 MILLER, JODI 51.50 AP - 00208057 3/17/2004 MILLIKEN, KEELY 2,000.00 AP - 00208058 3/17/2004 MILLIKEN, KEELY 1,200.00 AP - 00208059 3/17/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 55.00 AP- 00208060 3/17/2004 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 2,516.50 AP - 00208061 3/17/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP - 00208062 3/17/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 11,252.53 AP - 00208064 3/17/2004 NATIONS RENT 29.63 AP - 00208065 3/17/2004 NATIONS RENT 61.96 AP - 00208066 3/17/2004 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 33,840.00 AP- 00208067 3/17/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 90.38 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time;. ~, 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check Rel~ister 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 33.62 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -152.79 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 207.42 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -3.85 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 84.63 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 46.10 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 291.98 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 197.72 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 116.76 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 58.19 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT' 46.96 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 982.63 AP-00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.67 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 60.75 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 32.31 AP-00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 42.16 AP - 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 1,933.04 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 16.15 AP- 00208068 3/17/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 57.79 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 30.18 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.79 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 8.90 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.88 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -9.15 AP - 00208069 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.01 AP- 00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 195.00 AP- 00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 1,556.78 AP-00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 1,136.25 AP-00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 23.58 AP - 00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 1,779.34 AP- 00208070 3/17/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 260.00 AP - 00208071 3/17/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 459.54 AP - 00208071 3/17/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 65.04 AP - 00208072 3/17/2004 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 280.72 AP - 00208072 3/17/2004 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 223.78 AP - 00208073 3/17/2004 PACWICARE OF CALIFORNIA 55,442.94 AP - 00208074 3/17/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 53,916.49 AP - 00208074 3/17/2004 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 2,402.85 AP - 00208075 3/17/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 52.52 AP - 00208077 3/17/2004 PENNELL, JENNIFER 22.44 AP- 00208078 3/17/2004 PHASE II SYSTEMS 3,500.00 AP - 00208079 3/17/2004 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 575.29 AP - 00208080 3/17/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 102.45 AP - 00208080 3/17/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 323.95 AP - 00208081 3/17/2004 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00208082 3/17/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00208084 3/17/2004 PROCAST PRODUCTS INC 20,500.00 AP- 00208085 3/17/2004 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES L.P. 959.23 AP - 00208085 3/17/2004 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES L.P. 303.11 AP - 00208086 3/17/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 206.85 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 416.96 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 155.34 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 03/29/213(2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ ~1~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 403.18 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 698.54 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 492.41 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 223.13 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 236.25 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 561.19 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 463.98 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 42.89 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 285.80 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 92.39 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 297.80 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 152.07 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.50 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 525.21 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 661.34 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 30.95 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 41.92 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 82.50 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 392.27 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 54.77 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 419.99 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 30.00 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 124.96 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 41.92 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 134.31 AP- 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 285.47 AP - 00208087 3/17/2004 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 526.51 AP - 00208090 3/17/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 200.00 AP - 00208091 3/17/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY Y1V~ 2,048.79 AP-00208092 3/17/2004 RCPFA 6,305.38 AP- 00208093 3/17/2004 RDB ELECTRONICS INC 67.78 AP - 00208094 3/17/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 141.95 AP - 00208095 3/17/2004 REED, KATRINA 48.20 AP - 00208096 3/17/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 134.25 AP - 00208096 3/17/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,819.10 AP - 00208096 3/17/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 62.40 AP - 00208096 3/17/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,487.62 AP - 00208097 3/17/2004 RISING STARS 1,450.00 AP - 00208098 3/17/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 150.53 AP - 00208099 3/17/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00208 I00 3/17/2004 RODRIGUEZ, BRENDA 76.00 AP - 00208101 3/17/2004 S AND K ENGINEERS 3,862.50 AP - 00208102 3/17/2004 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 84.03 AP - 00208103 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 19,625.00 AP - 00208105 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERL-n~S DEPT 178.00 AP - 00208106 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 346.50 AP - 00208106 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 346.50 AP - 00208106 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 462.00 AP- 00208107 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,139,408.00 AP - 00208107 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIIq~S 24,281.00 AP - 00208107 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS 12,680.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 17 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel .~ 17:04:3 / -/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208108 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SI-IERIFFS 128.46 AP - 00208109 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CENTRAL MICROFILM 179.75 AP - 00208111 3/17/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99 AP - 00208111 3/17/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99 AP - 00208112 3/17/2004 SANCHEZ, MICHELLE 200.00 AP- 00208113 3/17/2004 SAWYER, ANGELA 100.00 AP- 00208115 3/17/2004 SBC 18,874.39 AP - 00208116 3/17/2004 SERRANO, ARTHUR 500.00 AP- 00208117 3/17/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 275.14 AP - 00208118 3/17/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 40.00 AP - 00208118 3/17/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 61.42 AP - 00208119 3/17/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 5,119.20 AP- 00208120 3/17/2004 SIX FLAGS MAGIC MOUNTAIN 1,127.50 AP - 00208120 3/17/2004 SIX FLAGS MAGIC MOUNTAIN 41.00 AP- 00208122 3/17/2004 SLUKA, SUSAN 500.00 AP- 00208124 3/17/2004 SO CAL ITE 40.00 AP - 00208125 3/17/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 287.10 AP - 00208125 3/17/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 628.43 AP - 00208125 3/17/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 361.70 AP - 00208125 3/17/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,263.06 AP- 00208125 3/17/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 394.66 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.20 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.76 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.15 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.57 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.86 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.72 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.39 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.80 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.74 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.71 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.19 AP - 00208129 3/1712004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.20 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.90 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel t~' 17:04:3 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.76 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTI-I~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTItlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.00 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.15 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.61 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.90 AP ~ 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.61 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.14 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.12 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.16 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.09 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.16 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.02 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.62 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.79 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.29 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.67 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 598.53 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.81 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.33 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.96 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.44 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.05 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.00 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.52 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 856.12 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 57.18 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.72 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.62 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP- 00208~29 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.17 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP- 00208129 3/17/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~/~ 17:04:3 1 ¥ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208130 3/17/2004 SPAGNOLO, SALVATORE A 100.00 AP - 00208131 3/17/2004 SPECTRA CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES 583.00 AP - 00208132 3/17/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP- 00208133 3/17/2004 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,616.25 AP - 00208134 3/17/2004 SUPERIOR TREE SERVICE 3,500.00 AP- 00208135 3/17/2004 SYNCHRONEX 250.27 AP- 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 178.99 AP- 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 366.20 AP - 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 286.86 AP - 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 205.62 AP- 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 292.84 AP- 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 277.85 AP- 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 693.34 AP - 00208136 3/17/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY O C 179.90 AP - 00208137 3/17/2004 TARGET 115.79 AP- 00208137 3/17/2004 TARGET 44.97 AP 00208137 3/17/2004 TARGET 46.48 AP 00208140 3/17/2004 TOMARK SPORTS INC 500.56 AP 00208141 3/17/2004 TOMMY AUSTINS FLORIST 70.58 AP 00208142 3/17/2004 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 567.00 AP 00208142 3/17/2004 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 810.00 AP 00208142 3/17/2004 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 837.00 AP 00208143 3/17/2004 TSASOUTHERNCAL1FORNIA 425.00 AP 00208144 3/17/2004 UMALI, YVONNE CARTER 30.00 AP 00208145 3/17/2004 UMPS AREUS ASSOCIATION 280.00 AP 00208145 3/17/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 1,851.50 AP 00208146 3/17/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC. 448.77 AP 00208148 3/17/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 6,730.00 AP 00208149 3/17/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,625.05 AP 00208149 3/17/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 22,312.89 AP-00208150 3/17/2004 UNIQUE CREATIONS 177.90 AP - 00208151 3/17/2004 UNITED TRAFFIC 475.18 AP- 00208152 3/17/2004 UNITED WAY 49.00 AP- 00208153 3/17/2004 UPS 18.91 AP- 00208153 3/17/2004 UPS 35.76 AP- 00208155 3/17/2004 US GUARDS CO INC 1,428.91 AP- 00208155 3/17/2004 US GUARDS CO 1NC 2,806.00 AP- 00208155 3/17/2004 US GUARDS CO INC 6,195.63 AP- 00208155 3/17/2004 US GUARDS CO INC 2,070.00 AP- 00208155 3/17/2004 US GUARDS CO INC 5,502.76 AP - 00208157 3/17/2004 VAN TILBURG, JACK F 6.00 AP- 00208158 3/17/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,872.45 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.82 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 21.02 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 22.37 AP - 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP-00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.94 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 .VERIZON 87.80 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: -20 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~;a ,~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP-00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP-00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP-00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208159 3/17/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP- 00208160 3/17/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP- 00208161 3/17/2004 VILLEGAS, MARIE 32.00 AP - 00208162 3/17/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 379.42 AP 00208162 3/17/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 77.89 AP 00208162 3/17/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 99.12 AP 00208162 3/17/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 91.59 AP 00208162 3/17/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 82.53 AP 00208163 3/17/2004 WATSON, EILEEN 125.00 AP 00208164 3/17/2004 WATSON, HARVEY 18.00 AP- 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 402.99 AP- 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 943.62 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8.25 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 298.77 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 544.69 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 663.65 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 34.48 AP - 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 83.72 AP- 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 913.45 AP- 00208165 3/17/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,546.78 AP- 00208166 3/17/2004 WESTERN PLUMBING 22.50 AP - 00208167 3/17/2004 WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY 209.45 AP- 00208168 3/17/2004 WHITSON, CLINTON R 100.00 AP- 00208170 3/17/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 106.15 AP- 00208170 3/17/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 44.38 AP- 00208170 3/17/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 176.33 AP - 00208171 3/17/2004 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L 67,300.00 AP - 00208171 3/17/2004 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L -6,730.00 AP - 00208172 3/17/2004 YWCA OF TH~ WEST END 1,881.76 AP- 00208173 3/17/2004 ZETTERBERG, BOB 28.30 AP- 00208174 3/17/2004 LAYNE, TAMARA 45.00 AP- 00208175 3/17/2004 LETS STOR IT 135.00 AP - 00208177 3/17/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 19,625.00 AP - 00208178 3/17/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99 AP - 00208179 3/17/2004 TSA SOUTHERN CALIEORNIA 350.00 AP - 00208180 3/17/2004 TSA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 75.00 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 121.52 AP-00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 167.40 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 1,270.19 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 179.76 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.45 AP - 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 59.72 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 215.14 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Dat~- 03/~9)20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ / 17:04:3 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 117.86 AP - 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 30.22 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 43.69 AP-00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP-00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 129.63 AP-00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 36.41 AP- 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 191.98 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 85.87 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VER]ZON 390.95 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208182 3/17/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP 00208183 3/17/2004 YEAGERCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANYINC, EL 67,300.00 AP 00208183 3/17/2004 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L -6,730.00 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 37.74 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 188.52 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9.63 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 119.53 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 43.01 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 46.29 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 72.11 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 143.91 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.78 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 36.61 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 62.53 AP 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 35.55 AP - 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.23 AP - 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.45 AP- 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 374.31 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:04:3 22. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208184 3/17/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 112.33 AP - 00208185 3/17/2004 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 280.72 AP- 00208185 3/17/2004 PACIPIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 223.78 AP - 00208186 3/18/2004 SAFFRON CATERING & EVENT SERVICES 242.44 AP - 00208187 3/18/2004 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 371.16 AP- 00208188 3/18/2004 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 341.16 AP - 00208189 3/18/2004 STONE, DEANNA 40.00 AP-00208190 3/18/2004 CCAC 395.00 AP - 00208192 3/24/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC -56.39 AP - 00208192 3/24/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 86.49 AP - 00208192 3/24/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 74.32 AP- 00208193 3/24/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 351.52 AP- 00208193 3/24/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 91.75 AP- 00208193 3/24/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 64.00 AP-00208193 3/24/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 52.37 AP- 00208193 3/24/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3.23 AP-00208194 3/24/2004 ABLAC 281.36 AP - 00208195 3/24/2004 ABLETRONICS 111.28 AP- 00208195 3/24/2004 ABLETRONICS 16.70 AP- 00208196 3/24/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,221.00 AP - 00208198 3/24/2004 ADVANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 700.00 AP - 00208198 3/24/2004 ADVANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS 1NC 24,097.22 AP - 00208199 3/24/2004 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 350.00 AP - 00208200 3/24/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 193.29 AP - 00208201 3/24/2004 ALLPOINTS BACKHOE SERVICE 1,000.00 AP - 00208202 3/24/2004 ALPHAGRAPHICS 806.00 AP - 00208202 3/24/2004 ALPHAGRAPHICS 416.96 AP - 00208203 3/24/2004 AMERICAN GOLD MORTGAGE 1,377.00 AP - 00208204 3/24/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 179.00 AP - 00208205 3/24/2004 APHRC42 LLC 5,000.00 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 270.13 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 59.35 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 34.60 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 173.78 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 40.00 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 164.70 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 338.92 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,038.16 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 23.90 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 900.00 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 294.36 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 25.83 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 425.16 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 617.03 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,521.82 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 406.86 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 43.05 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 408.30 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 69.32 AP - 00208206 3/24/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 64.43 AP - 00208207 3/24/2004 ASSOC. OF PERFORMING ARTS PRESENTERS 450.00 AP - 00208208 3/24/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ ~n 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208208 3/24/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,362.50 AP - 00208209 3/24/2004 AUTO SPECIALISTS 489.88 AP - 00208210 3/24/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 126.35 AP - 00208210 3/24/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 403.14 AP - 00208210 3/24/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 140.11 AP - 00208210 3/24/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 129.30 AP - 00208210 3/24/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 129.30 AP - 00208211 3/24/2004 BAKER, SHARI 600.00 AP - 00208212 3/24/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 8,700.00 AP - 00208212 3/24/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,290.00 AP - 00208212 3/24/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 8,849.00 AP - 00208212 3/24/2004 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 2,085.00 AP - 00208214 3/24/2004 BLACKBAUD 440.98 AP-00208215 3/24/2004 BODY SHOTS 558.25 AP 00208216 3/24/2004 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 473.57 AP 00208217 3/24/2004 BORDNER, MARGIE 1,135.80 AP 00208218 3/24/2004 BRODART BOOKS 1,678.33 AP 00208219 3/24/2004 BROWER, DENISE 264.00 AP 00208220 3/24/2004 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 472.50 AP 00208221 3/24/2004 BUBALOCONSTRUCTIONCO,STEVE 817,751.54 AP 00208221 3/24/2004 BUBALOCONSTRUCTIONCO,STEVE -2,164.68 AP 00208221 3/24/2004 BUBALOCONSTRUCTIONCO,STEVE 21,646.81 AP 00208221 3/24/2004 BUBALOCONSTRUCTIONCO,STEVE -81,775.15 AP 00208222 3/24/2004 BURKE, KAREN 30.60 AP - 00208223 3/24/2004 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 118.42 AP- 00208223 3/24/2004 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 138.83 AP - 00208225 3/24/2004 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 354.45 AP-00208226 3/24/2004 CALBO 215.00 AP- 00208227 3/24/2004 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 74,129.91 AP - 00208228 3/24/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00 AP - 00208229 3/24/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 43.31 AP - 00208230 3/24/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50 AP - 00208232 3/24/2004 CALSENSE 7,014.53 AP- 00208232 3/24/2004 CALSENSE 25.37 AP - 00208232 3/24/2004 CALSENSE 256.45 AP - 00208233 3/24/2004 CALTAC 20.00 AP - 00208233 3/24/2004 CALTAC 40.00 AP - 00208234 3/24/2004 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 17.92 AP - 00208235 3/24/2004 CAPITAL DRYWALL 302.00 AP - 00208236 3/24/2004 CARAWAY, ROBIN 9.00 AP - 00208237 3/24/2004 CCPOA 30.00 AP- 00208238 3/24/2004 CELSOC 237.45 AP- 00208238 3/24/2004 CELSOC 181.00 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 998.52 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 124.81 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 31.20 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 249.63 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 218.43 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 187.22 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 31.20 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 405.65 AP - 00208239 3/24/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 873.70 AP - 00208240 3/24/2004 CITATION BUILDERS 1,000.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Current Date: 03/29/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:. II 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208241 3/24/2004 CITY RENTALS 111.72 AP - 00208242 3/24/2004 CLARK, KAREN 316.80 AP - 00208243 3/24/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 2.88 AP - 00208243 3/24/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 18.75 AP - 00208243 3/24/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 67.36 AP - 00208243 3/24/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 72.18 AP - 00208243 3/24/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 64.82 AP- 00208244 3/24/2004 COLE, NINA 16.12 AP - 00208245 3/24/2004 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 1,760.70 AP - 00208246 3/24/2004 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 201.20 AP - 00208247 3/24/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 814.94 AP - 00208250 3/24/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00208251 3/24/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00208252 3/24/2004 CRESCENTA TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 784.87 AP- 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 274.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.22 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254.03 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.37 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 357.33 AP- 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 84.88 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 240.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 591.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.18 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 410.65 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 410.65 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 193.53 AP ~ 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,799.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 9.14 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.98 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,466.83 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.03 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 284.73 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 256.13 AP 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.03 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.18 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 757.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.23 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 59.58 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.03 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 25 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~i~ ~,17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check Re~ister 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.48 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.33 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 193.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 109.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.33 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.53 AP- 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 337.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 217.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 367.23 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.73 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.68 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.11 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.12 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 185.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.73 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 240.73 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,219.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 305.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.38 AP- 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 836.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.93 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.23 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.03 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.83 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 238.53 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 338.63 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79,13 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.73 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.23 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.21 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 368.33 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.43 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.88 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96.39 AP - 00208256 3/24/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.13 AP - 00208257 3/24/2004 CUTTING EDGE VIDEO CONCEPTS 5,195.00 AP - 00208258 3/24/2004 D 3 EQUIPMENT 64.52 AP - 00208260 3/24/2004 DANCE TERRIFIC 2,551.30 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 26 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timfi.~ ,17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208261 3/24/2004 DATA QUICK 93.50 AP - 00208262 3/24/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 374,658.59 AP - 00208263 3/24/2004 DAWSON, MICHELLE 35.00 AP - 00208264 3/24/2004 DAY TIMERS [NC 32.30 AP - 00208265 3/24/2004 DEL TACO 260.78 AP - 00208266 3/24/2004 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 10,558.64 AP - 00208266 3/24/2004 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 8,184.13 AP - 00208267 3/24/2004 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 100.92 AP - 00208267 3/24/2004 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 58.00 AP - 00208268 3/24/2004 DOMINGUEZ, ROBERTO 2,970.00 AP - 00208269 3/24/2004 DONOVAN ENTERPRISES 3,411.35 AP - 00208269 3/24/2004 DONOVAN ENTERPRISES 51.17 AP - 00208270 3/24/2004 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 753.00 AP - 00208271 3/24/2004 DUI~Ic¥, RICK 1,636.25 AP - 00208272 3/24/2004 DYAN INC, DIANE 499.50 AP- 00208273 3/24/2004 DYNASTY GYM 2,846.70 AP - 00208274 3/24/2004 EASTER, PAMELA 42.75 AP - 00208276 3/24/2004 EMBEE TECHNOLOGIES 4,489.79 AP - 00208278 3/24/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 75.00 AP - 00208279 3/24/2004 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 1,837.14 AP - 00208280 3/24/2004 EXPERIAN 50.00 AP - 00208281 3/24/2004 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 364.50 AP - 00208282 3/24/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 14.87 AP - 00208282 3/24/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.89 AP - 00208282 3/24/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 57.24 AP - 00208282 3/24/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 75.62 AP - 00208283 3/24/2004 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 905.00 AP - 00208284 3/24/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00208284 3/24/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00 AP- 00208284 3/24/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 788.44 AP - 00208284 3/24/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP - 00208285 3/24/2004 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 230.80 AP - 00208286 3/24/2004 FIRST SCRIPT 13.76 AP - 00208287 3/24/2004 FISH3ER SCIENTIFIC 125.34 AP - 00208287 3/24/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 40.56 AP - 00208287 3/24/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 11.74 AP - 00208287 3/24/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC -125.34 AP - 00208287 3/24/2004 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 61.05 AP - 00208288 3/24/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 14.09 AP - 00208288 3/24/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 27.00 AP - 00208289 3/24/2004 GENERAL NUTRITION CENTER 3825 12.55 AP - 00208290 3/24/2004 GENERAL TELEPHONE 5,000.00 AP - 00208291 3/24/2004 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 240.00 AP - 00208292 3/24/2004 GONZALEZ, PATRICIA 30.00 AP - 00208293 3/24/2004 GRAINGER, WW 330.68 AP - 00208293 3/24/2004 GRAINGER, WW 206.14 AP - 00208293 3/24/2004 GRAINGER, WW 5.50 AP - 00208294 3/24/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 108.77 AP - 00208295 3/24/2004 GRIIqqN HOMES 2,500.00 AP - 00208297 3/24/2004 GTSI CORP 7,014.67 AP - 00208298 3/24/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 233.08 AP - 00208299 3/24/2004 HANGER 18, LLC 105.00 AP - 00208300 3/24/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 27 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ ~,1 17:04:3 ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208301 3/24/2004 HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS 53.82 AP - 00208302 3/24/2004 HEILIG, KELLY 1,099.80 AP - 00208303 3/24/2004 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH 2,000.00 AP - 00208304 3/24/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 69.50 AP - 00208305 3/24/2004 HOMME, PHILLIP 1,000.00 AP - 00208307 3/24/2004 HOYT, RAYMOND 1,077.60 AP - 00208308 3/24/2004 HSU, STEVE 504.00 AP - 00208309 3/24/2004 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP - 00208310 3/24/2004 IBM CORPORATION 10,990.83 AP- 00208310 3/24/2004 IBM CORPORATION 1,104.43 AP- 00208310 3/24/2004 IBM CORPORATION 417.38 AP - 00208311 3/24/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 136.47 AP - 00208312 3/24/2004 IFEA 295.00 AP - 00208314 3/24/2004 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATI£ 592.00 AP - 00208316 3/24/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 581.70 AP - 00208318 3/24/2004 1NLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,731.00 AP- 00208319 3/24/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 167.24 AP - 00208319 3/24/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 51.44 AP - 00208319 3/24/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 51.44 AP-00208319 3/24/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 58.91 AP - 00208320 3/24/2004 iRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 362.00 AP- 00208321 3/24/2004 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 53.08 AP- 00208321 3/24/2004 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 148.30 AP - 00208322 3/24/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,262.50 AP - 00208322 3/24/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,533.27 AP- 00208323 3/24/2004 JONES, BOB 2,240.00 AP - 00208324 3/24/2004 JONES, JAMES 157.50 AP - 00208325 3/24/2004 KELLY BLUE BOOK 60.06 AP - 00208326 3/24/2004 KELLY, SEAN 1,000.00 AP - 00208328 3/24/2004 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 2,974.30 AP - 00208329 3/24/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 5,200.00 AP- 00208329 3/24/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 4,387.50 AP - 00208329 3/24/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES 1NC 3,437.46 AP - 00208329 3/24/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 5,200.00 AP - 00208330 3/24/2004 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 887.69 AP - 00208330 3/24/2004 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 729.61 AP - 00208331 3/24/2004 LACROIX, MICHELLE 29.98 AP - 00208332 3/24/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 10,500.00 AP - 00208332 3/24/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 2,032.05 AP - 00208332 3/24/2004 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 2,500.00 AP - 00208333 3/24/2004 LAM, JACK 100.00 AP - 00208334 3/24/2004 LEIFI~ER, LUKAS 135.00 AP - 00208335 3/24/2004 LENNAR HOMES INLAND DIVISION 1,000.00 AP - 00208337 3/24/2004 LIM, HEATHER 787.50 AP - 00208338 3/24/2004 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 1,057.50 AP - 00208339 3/24/2004 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 22.76 AP - 00208340 3/24/2004 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 49.59 AP - 00208341 3/24/2004 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00208342 3/24/2004 M C I WORLDCOM 680.45 AP - 00208343 3/24/2004 MAIN STREET SIGNS 413.76 AP - 00208344 3/24/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 5.85 AP - 00208344 3/24/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 12.52 AP - 00208344 3/24/2004 MANELA, ROSARIO 14.72 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 28 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim,~e: te~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208345 3/24/2004 MANELA, ROSIE 12.96 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,379.68 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,159.84 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,664.31 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 17,072.89 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 558.10 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,073.52 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 119.79 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 527.52 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,656.03 AP - 00208346 3/24/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,975.13 AP- 00208347 3/24/2004 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,129.50 AP - 00208348 3/24/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 75.74 AP - 00208349 3/24/2004 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 228.00 AP - 00208351 3/24/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 19.98 AP- 00208351 3/24/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 91.93 AP - 00208351 3/24/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 94.96 AP - 00208351 3/24/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 107.92 AP - 00208351 3/24/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 202.90 AP - 00208352 3/24/2004 MILLS, CAREY 966.00 AP - 00208353 3/24/2004 MITCHELL, WALTER Z 525.00 AP - 00208354 3/24/2004 MOE, JOHN 270.00 AP - 00208355 3/24/2004 MOREAU, CHADD 315.00 AP - 00208356 3/24/2004 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 292.95 AP - 00208356 3/24/2004 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 621.45 AP - 00208357 3/24/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 126.07 AP- 00208358 3/24/2004 MSA 15.00 AP-00208358 3/24/2004 MSA 15.00 AP - 00208359 3/24/2004 MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING 300.00 AP - 00208360 3/24/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31 AP - 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 94.01 AP ~ 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.92 AP - 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 297.43 AP - 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 59.64 AP- 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 132.83 AP - 00208361 3/24/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 89.45 AP - 00208362 3/24/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 801.10 AP - 00208363 3/24/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 25,797.67 AP - 00208364 3/24/2004 NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 13,147.62 AP - 00208365 3/24/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 200.00 AP - 00208365 3/24/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC i00.00 AP - 00208365 3/24/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00 AP - 00208367 3/24/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208367 3/24/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00208368 3/24/2004 NINYO AND MOORE GEOECHNICAL 2,197.50 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 61.35 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 34.38 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 860.72 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 21.64 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 44.13 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 29.76 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 122.77 AP- 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 121.34 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 29 Current Date: 03/29/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Ti~z,~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 53.49 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 475.57 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 55.46 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 160.80 AP - 00208369 3/24/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 19.27 AP - 00208370 3/24/2004 OLTMAN'S INVESTMENT CO 1,000.00 AP - 00208371 3/24/2004 OMNITRANS 707.00 AP - 00208372 3/24/2004 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 722.40 AP - 00208373 3/24/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 29.89 AP - 00208373 3/24/2004 OWEN ELECTRIC 98.05 AP - 00208374 3/24/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 60.86 AP - 00208374 3/24/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 14.64 AP - 00208375 3/24/2004 PAPER DIRECT INC 113.40 AP - 00208375 3/24/2004 PAPER DIRECT INC 159.85 AP - 00208376 3/24/2004 PARKER, SHANNON 252.00 AP - 00208378 3/24/2004 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 48.00 AP - 00208379 3/24/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,411.51 AP- 00208380 3/24/2004 PORT SUPPLY 779.98 AP- 00208381 3/24/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 245.34 AP - 00208381 3/24/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 156.94 AP - 00208382 3/24/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 29.60 AP - 00208382 3/24/2004 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 9.58 AP - 00208383 3/24/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 170.25 AP - 00208384 3/24/2004 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,669.40 AP - 00208385 3/24/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 14,174.13 AP - 00208386 3/24/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,739.95 AP- 00208387 3/24/2004 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00208388 3/24/2004 R C BASEBALL 289.00 AP - 00208389 3/24/2004 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY 98.59 AP - 00208390 3/24/2004 RBF CONSULTING 3,000.00 AP - 00208391 3/24/2004 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 84.74 AP - 00208392 3/24/2004 REICHMAN, MATT 750.00 AP - 00208393 3/24/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00208394 3/24/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 66.27 AP - 00208395 3/24/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00208396 3/24/2004 RMA GROUP 625.00 AP - 00208397 3/24/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00208398 3/24/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00208398 3/24/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00208400 3/24/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 57.62 AP - 00208401 3/24/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC WOI 11,537.40 AP - 00208402 3/24/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 233.50 AP - 00208403 3/24/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYi~ 213.00 AP - 00208404 3/24/2004 SECC CORP 1,000.00 AP - 00208405 3/24/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 115.00 AP - 00208406 3/24/2004 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 414.92 AP - 00208407 3/24/2004 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 262,504.93 AP - 00208407 3/24/2004 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -26,250.49 AP - 00208408 3/24/2004 SIMMONS, ARLENE 430.00 AP - 00208409 3/24/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,090.35 AP - 00208409 3/24/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 4,379.50 AP - 00208409 3/24/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 447.16 AP - 00208409 3/24/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 840.45 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 30 Current Date: 03/29/20E Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim ' j~ 17:04:3 _ _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208410 3/24/2004 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP - 00208411 3/24/2004 SINATRA, MICHAEL 75.00 AP - 00208412 3/24/2004 SIR SPEEDY 22.86 AP - 00208413 3/24/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 324.70 AP- 00208413 3/24/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,129.31 AP - 00208414 3/24/20~4 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00 AP - 00208414 3/24/2004 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00 AP - 00208415 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CAL[F BROADCASTERS ASSOC SC£ 35.00 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,754.13 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.54 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.68 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.43 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.47 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.29 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.80 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.51 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.92 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.37 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.98 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.33 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.63 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.12 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.61 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.03 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.23 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.87 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.43 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.83 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.04 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.95 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTi~IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.00 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.16 AP ~ 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.12 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,492.73 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,322.56 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,160.49 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.22 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.51 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.27 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 31 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim.,,ql/ 17:04:3 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.82 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.06 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.11 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.01 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.58 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.20 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.27 AP- 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 169.08 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.85 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.74 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.16 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.63 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTttlERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.47 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,725.45 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.30 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.72 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.01 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.84 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.00 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.70 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.22 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.73 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.69 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.74 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.71 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.61 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00208419 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.90 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19,429.89 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,992.80 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,212.90 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,727.75 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.47 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 526.05 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,105.56 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,419.94 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,674.87 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.40 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.02 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,987.41 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.52 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.55 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 32 Current Date: 03/29/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim,~ ~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.36 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38,223.03 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP - 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHJ~RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,868.67 AP- 00208420 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,120.96 AP - 00208421 3/24/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEIVI~NT. 4,875.00 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 1,833.70 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 137,104.11 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 18,048.02 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -4,206.70 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -4,206.70 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY 1NC -13,710.42 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 18,048.02 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -5,386.50 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -183.37 AP - 00208422 3/24/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 53,865.00 AP - 00208423 3/24/2004 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 316.16 AP - 00208423 3/24/2004 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 455.49 AP- 00208424 3/24/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP - 00208425 3/24/2004 SUNRISE FORD 111.09 AP - 00208425 3/24/2004 SUNRISE FORD 77.30 AP - 00208426 3/24/2004 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 3,240.00 AP - 00208427 3/24/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 669.88 AP- 00208427 3/24/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 101.42 AP ~ 00208428 3/24/2004 TAVA DEVELOPMENT 1,000.00 AP - 00208429 3/24/2004 TERRY, DONNA 432.00 AP - 00208430 3/24/2004 TIME WARNER TELECOM INC 1,280.45 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN' LANDCARE 1,138.97 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,754.85 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 84.61 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,673.01 AP - 00208431 3~24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,862.99 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 60,185.68 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,238.33 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 48.72 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,415.77 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 13,791.90 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 581.00 AP - 00208431 3/24/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 605.05 AP - 00208432 3/24/2004 U S HOME CORPORATION 1,000.00 AP - 00208433 3/24/2004 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 51.80 AP - 00208434 3/24/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC. 352.00 AP - 00208434 3/24/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC. 225.54 AP-00208436 3/24/2004 UNITEDWAY 588.32 AP - 00208437 3/24/2004 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,440.00 AP - 00208438 3/24/2004 UPS 48.78 AP - 00208439 3/24/2004 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 32.45 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 28.46 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 28.87 AP- 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 154.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 33 Current Date: 03/29/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~b .n~ 17:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP ~ 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 85.87 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 113.15 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 53.03 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 44.49 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 52.87 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 91.58 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 38.71 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 38.71 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 31.66 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 56.57 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 28.73 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 20.41 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 56.57 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 31.32 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP- 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 28.54 AP - 00208441 3/24/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00208442 3/24/2004 VFS FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 1,000.00 AP - 00208443 3/24/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP - 00208444 3/24/2004 VISTA PAINT 329.08 AP - 00208445 3/24/2004 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00208446 3/24/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 311.33 AP - 00208446 3/24/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 146.21 AP - 00208446 3/24/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 146.21 AP - 00208446 3/24/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 18.10 AP - 00208446 3/24/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 38.78 AP - 00208447 3/24/2004 WALTON CONSTRUCTION COMAPNY 1,000.00 AP - 00208448 3/24/2004 WARD, DESIREE 525.00 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY 16.65 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXiE SANITARY SUPPLY 871.20 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY 237.15 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY -47.24 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 65.51 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXlE SANITARY SUPPLY 732.59 AP - 00208449 3/24/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 531.81 AP - 00208450 3/24/2004 WCISA 40.00 AP - 00208451 3/24/2004 WERTHMAN, RHONDA 32.00 AP - 00208451 3/24/2004 WERTHMAN, RHONDA 20.00 AP - 00208452 3/24/2004 WEST COAST WAREHOUSE INC 233.00 AP - 00208453 3/24/2004 WEST GROUP 405.12 AP - 00208454 3/24/2004 WHITTLER FERTILIZER 295.24 AP - 00208455 3/24/2004 WILSON AND BELL 583.63 AP - 00208457 3/24/2004 ZAILO, ROBERT 172.80 AP - 00208458 3/24/2004 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 479.70 AP - 00208459 3/24/2004 NEV1NS, HOWARD 65.00 AP - 00208460 3/25/2004 DOUBLE D P1PELINE INC 194,854.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 34 Current Date: 03/29/20G Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~;~ ,117:04:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 3/6/2004 through 3/25/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount Total for Check ID AP: 6,019,544.27 Total for Entity: 6,019,544.27 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 35 Current Date: 03/29/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ,,.~17:04:3 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E PAR Ti~IE N T Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF ARBOR LANE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 16123035650/1442612-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Arbor Lane landscape improvements between Church Street and the northerly terminus of Arbor Lane, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The phase requesting action on is part of the eleven-phase capital improvement program, which will install the necessary infrastructure surrounding the Victoria Gardens Mall. Phase lB(e) is that phase which constructs landscaping, hardscape, and various amenities within the median on Arbor Lane - all of which are to the benefit of the participants and non- participants to CFD's 2001-01. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Ph 1Be for Arbor Ln April 7, 2004 Page 2 As stated above, the capital improvement program to install the necessary infrastructure within the Victoria Gardens Mall sphere consists of eleven construction phases. The sphere extends from Base Line Road on the noah, Arrow Route and the 1-15 Freeway to the south, the SC Edison transmission corridor to the west, and Etiwanda Avenue and 1-15 Freeway to the east (see exhibit). The eleven phases are as follows: # Phase Description Status I Ph lA Day Creek Blvd. noah of Church St. and Church St. west of Day Creek Blvd. Mass Grading Complete of the residential area north of Church St. and water, sewer, traffic signals, and major storm drain improvements 2 Ph lB(a) Day Creek Blvd. south of Church St., Church St. east of Day Creek Blvd., Victoda Park Lane Under construction north of Church St., Arbor Ln. north of Church St., and Base Line Rd. east of Day Creek Blvd. Also water, sewer, major storm drain, landscaping and traffic signals. 3 Ph lB(b) North side of Foothill Blvd. west of Day Creek Blvd. In addition storm drain, sewer and Advertise water. 4 Ph lB(c) Sidewalk and landscaping on Day Creek Blvd noah of Church St. Under construction 5 Ph lB(d) Traffic Signal at Church St. and Etiwanda Ave Awaiting Caltrans Perml 6 Ph lB(e) Landscaping on Arbor Ln. north of Church St. Requesting advertising 7 Ph 3A Street, major storm drain, and water on Victoria Gardens Ln. Under construction 8 Ph 3B(a) Foothill Blvd. east of Da), Creek Channel. Advertise 9 Ph 3B(b) Foothill Blvd. west of Da}, Creek Channel. Advertise 10 Ph 3B(c) Mall public sewer and water Complete 11 Ph 01103 Final street cap, and cleanup work Under design The configuration of the above phases are a result of the formation of the two CFD's as well as the most cost efficient construction of the improvements. Funds for the Arbor Lane improvements are from CFD (a/c #'s 1 612 303 5650/1442 612~ 0). District formation costs for construction are estimated at $1,000,000, which includes a 10% contingency. Projections for soils and survey costs are estimated to total $60,000. Proposals for survey services have been awarded. Soils services are under review by staff and will be brought before the City Council at a later date. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 13 and April 20, 2004, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, unless extended by Addenda. Re~s.p._e%ctfully submitted, Willi~,n~' J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WCS Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution PROJECT .-' SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Phase lB(e) of CFD 2001-01 for LandSCaping and Amenities on Arbor Ln between Church Street and the n,,ortherly terminus of Arbor Ln , RESOLUTION NO. 0/~' 1~,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 'lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-0"1, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF ARBOR LANE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga~ WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "PHASE '1B(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 200~- 0'1, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSAL,g" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directin9 this notice, NOTICE I$ HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamon§a will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, sealed bids or proposals for the "PHASE ~ B(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE "capital improvement project in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, '10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PHASE 'lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 200'1-0~, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE ". RESOLUTION NO. April 7, 2004 Page 2 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or RESOLUTION NO. April 7, 2004 Page 3 D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Pad 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. RESOLUTION NO. April 7, 2004 Page 4 The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $65.00 (SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). RESOLUTION NO. April 7, 2004 Page 5 The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "PHASE lB(E) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND AMENITIES ON ARBOR LANE" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 7~h day of April, 2004 Publish Dates: April 13 and April 20, 2004 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7th day of April, 2004. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7th day of April, 2004 Executed this 7th day of April, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 13 and April 20, 2004 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Enginee~ SUBJEOT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $178,750 FOR CONSTRUCTION SURVEY SERVICES FOR CFD 2001-01 - PHASE 1Bb (NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD), PHASE 1Bc (PHASE lA SIDEWALK & LANDSCAPE), PHASE 1Bd (CHURCH STREET/ETIWANDA AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL) AND PHASE 1Be (ARBOR LANE LANDSCAPING) TO BE FUNDED FROM CFD 2001-01 FUNDS, ACCOUNT 16123035300/1442612-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $178,750 for construction survey services, previously awarded to Dan Guerra and Associates, for the subject phases of CFD 2001-01. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Community Facilities District (CFD) 2001-01 funds the design and construction of necessary public facilities integral with the proposed mall near Foothill Boulevard and the 1- 15 Freeway, as well as future residential development north of the proposed mall site. This infrastructure has been designed and will be constructed in multiple phases. Phases lB(b), 1B(c), lB(d), and lB(e) are the yet-to-be-constructed "minor" phases of CFD 2001-01, the first of two CFD's funding public improvements around the mall. These phases consist of the installation of landscaping and sidewalk on a portion of Day Creek Boulevard, the future traffic signal at Church Street and Etiwanda Avenue, a portion of Foothill Boulevard just west of Day Creek Boulevard, and landscaping on Arbor Lane north of Church Street. Below is a listing of all phases associated with the construction of public improvements within the Victoria Gardens Mall sphere. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, PHASES lB(b), lB(c), lB(d), and lB(e) April 7, 2004 Page 2 # Phase Descdption Status 1 Ph lA Day Creek Blvd. north of Church St. and Church St. west of Bay Creek BIvd. Mass Complete Grading of the residential area north of Church St. and water, sewer, traffic signals, and major storm drain improvements 2 Ph 1B(a) Day Creek Blvd. south of Church St., Church St. east of Day Creek Blvd., Victoria Park Under construction Lane north of Church St., Arbor Ln. north of Church St., and Base Line Rd. east of Day Creek Blvd. Aisc water, sewer, major storm drain, landscaping and traffic signals. 3 Ph lB(b) North side of Foothill Blvd. west of Day Creek Blvd. In addition storm drain, sewer and Currently advertised water. 4 Ph lB(c) Sidewalk and landscaping on Da}' Creek Blvd north of Church St. Under construction 5 Ph lB(d) Traffic Signal at Church St, and Etiwanda Ave Awaiting Caltrans Permit 6 Ph '~B(e) Landscaping on Arbor Ln. north of Church St. Completing design 7 Ph 3A Street, major storm drain, and water on Victoda Gardens Ln. Under construction 8 Ph 3B(a) Foothill Blvd. east of Da}' Creek Channel. Currently advertised 9 Ph 3B(b) Foothill Blvd. west of Da}, Creek Channel. Currently advertised 10 Ph 3B(c) Mall public sewer and water Construction Complete 11 Ph 01/03 Final street cap, and cleanup work Under desitin On March 3, 2004, City Council awarded a contract to Dan Guerra and Associates to perform construction survey for the subject phases. Staff now wishes to appropriate the funds necessary to perform this work. Respectfully submitted, W~li~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WCS SITE ~ I CITY OF RANCHO .CUCAMONGA Phase lB(b), lB(c), lB(d) & lB(e) of CFD 2001-01 T H C I T Y 0 F I~AN CliO CU CA bi 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF A "YES" VOTE FOR EACH CITY OWNED PARCEL ON THE MOSQUITO CONTROL AND DISEASE PREVENTION MEASURE BY THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council vote yes on behalf of C~.- owned parcels on the Mosquito Control and Disease Prevention Measure by the W~st Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District (the District). Back.qround The District would like to provide an enhanced level of vector control and disease prevention service to Rancho Cucamonga. The District currently provides a basic level of service to the City under a contract. The current service is reactive and responds only when there is a call for service. The proposal is to annex the City into the District and assess all property owners an annual fee to pay for enhanced services. The assessment for each single-family residence is $10 per year. Before the annexation can proceed, the District is conducting an election among all property owners to see if there is support for the proposed assessment. The election is via a mailed ballot. The ballots have all been mailed and the deadline for turning them in is April 21, 2004. An independent accounting firm will count the ballots. As a property owner, the City is entitled to vote for each property that it owns. However, as a public agency, the City will not be assessed the fee for the service. Attached for your reference is a copy of the Ballot Information Guide and Official Notice. This document explains why the ballot is being sent to property owners, the proposed services to be provided and the proposed amount of the assessment. In Page 2 April 7, 2004 AUTHORIZATION OF A "YES" VOTE FOR EACH CITY OWNED PARCEL ON THE MOSQUITO CONTROL AND DISEASE PREVENTION MEASURE BY THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT the guide, the District proposes to begin year-round control of mosquitoes before they hatch. This control will be accomplished through surveys of the community to identify and treat potential breeding areas. The District also proposes to begin year- round testing and monitoring for diseases carried by mosquitoes and rodents such as West Nile Virus, Encephalitis, Plague, Hantavirus and other diseases. The disease surveillance will be done by testing dead birds and rodents, establishing sentinel chicken flocks and testing insects and rodents caught in traps. The District will also respond to calls regarding Africanized Honeybees, Yellowjackets and other stinging insects. The District will also increase its community education program to residents, businesses and schools on how to protect against these pests and the diseases they carry. There are compelling reasons to increase vector control service. The first reason is simply to keep pace with the increases in population and to address new pest concerns of our residents. An example is the increase of bee related calls since the Africanized Honey Bees reached California with the accompanying media attention. People are concerned about this new threat and as a result, more calls are received regarding bee swarms. The District is concerned that the same type of thing may occur with calls for mosquitoes once the West Nile Virus establishes itself in California. As people learn that mosquitoes carry the disease and as the number of cases increase over the next few years, people will be more sensitive to mosquitoes as a pest to be eradicated. Another reason for increasing service is to protect public health. New vectors and new vector-borne diseases are being introduced into California. The best defense against the spread of these vectors and diseases is proactive surveillance and control measures. Without these measures, the potential public health risks are increased. As the public will benefit from the increased vector control services and as the General Fund will not be negatively impacted by this vote, it is recommended that the City Council authorize a yes vote on the measure for each City owned parcel. Respectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager attachment: Ballot Information Guide and Official Notice I~1osquito facts Disease Spread.' Hosquitoes Infected with a disease can spread that disease to other humans or animals when they b~te and suck b,ood. BALLOT INFORMATION GUIDE Why DO f4osquito Bites Ztch? When a mosquito bites, AN D it injects chemicals to prevent the blood from clotting. These chemicals cause irritation that makes you itch. OFFICIAL NOTICE Do All Suck Bloo~l? Only the female mosquitoes feed on blood; male mosquitoes feed on plant nectar and juices. Breeding: tVlosquitoes lay eggs in stagnant, standing Mail-In Ballot water. These eggs turn into larvae that live in the water until they hatch into adult mosquitoes. By eliminating FOR THE standing water, we can eliminate the sources of mosquitoes. How Many From a Bucket? A small household bucket PROPOSED filled with stagnant water can produce thousands of MOSQUITOCONTROL AND mosquitoes per day. DISEASE PREVENTION MEASURE Lifespan: About 14 days for females; 7 days for males. Eggs: One female can lay as many as 600 eggs in its lifetime. Wing Speed.' IVloves more than 1,000 times a second; that is the buzzing sound we hear. When mosquitoes bite humans or animals, they can transmit diseases and viruses 12 Why Did You Receive This Ballot? Method of Voting The West Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District is an Complete the enclosed official ballot, place it in the provided independent special distdct (separate from the County or return envelope, and mail immediately. To count, your any city) that controls and monitors disease-cam/lng insects official ballot must be received before the end of the and rodents such as mosquitoes and roof rats, and other public input portion of the public hearing on Wednesday, harmful pests such asyellowjackets, wasps, andAfdcanized April 21, 2004. Only official ballots which are returned, Honeybees. The District also protects the public health by signed, and marked with the property owner's support or regularly testing for and working to prevent diseases that opposition are counted. If you lose your ballot, require a are spread by mosquitoes, other insects, and rodents, replacement ballot, or want to change your vote, please call (909) 627-0931 for another ballot. Ballots are weighted by Currently, the District provides full mosquito and disease the proposed amount of assessment and will be tabulated prevention services in the cities of Chino, Chino Hills, and accordingly by C.G. Uhlenberg LLP, an independent the southern portions of Ontario and Montclair because accounting and auditing firm. The District shall not impose property owners in these areas pay for this level of service, the assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority Only limited mosquito and insect control services are protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the public hearing, currently provided in the area of your property because no weighted ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment funding source for full services is currently available, exceed the weighted ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. If a majority of weighted ballots returned are in With the rise of emerging diseases such as West Nile Virus, support, the assessment may be levied for fiscal year 2004- the District has seamhed for ways to provide full mosquito 05 and may be continued in future years to fund ongoing control and disease prevention services in your area. If approved, this ballot measure will allow the District to provide mosquito control and disease prevention services. comprehensive, year-round services in your area to better Public Hearing control mosquitoes and other disease-carrying pests and A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 21, better protect the public health. 2004 at 1:30 p.m. at the West Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District'offices located at 13355 Elliot Ave., Chino, California 91710. You are invited to attend the public hearing. Tabulation of the returned ballots will commence after the close of the public input portion of the hearing, and the results of the tabulation are expected to be announced at the continuation of the public hearing scheduled for May 12, 2004 at 1:30 p.m. at the same District office location. Will This Assessment Increase in Future Years? The assesgment cannot be increagod in future ye~rg without approval from property owners in another assessment ballot proceeding, except for an annual adjustment tied to the change in the Los Angeles Area Consumer Price Index (CPI), 2' Female mosquito laying eggs in standing water not to exceed 3% per year. 11 What Are the Public Accountability Safeguards? This ballot measure will include several layers of fiscal safeguards to ensure that all funds are expended appropriately. Summary Of Proposed Services: First. the funds raised in the District can only be spent on Mosquitoes-Year-round control of mosquitoes before mosquito, other vector, and disease control services within the they hatch, at source locations using environmentally District. Second. the funds will be overseen by a publicly safe methods, inspection and control of mosquitoes in appointed board of trustees. Third, there will be annual audits residential, commercial, and agricultural areas. Free by a professional auditor to ensure that all funds are expended mosquitofish for backyard fishponds. Door-to-door appropriately. And fourth, the budget for the services proposed mosquito inspections. for each year will be presented to the public annually. Disease Surveillance - Year-round testing and monitoring for diseases carried by insects and rodents, How Much Is This Assessment? such as West Nile Virus, Encephalitis, Dog Heartworm, The proposed assessment for your property for fiscal year 2004- Malaria~ Plague, Hantavirus, Lyme Disease and other 05 is printed on the Official Ballot included with this notice and emerging vector-borne diseases. information item. For single family homes it is $10.00, while other residential property types are assessed according to their Rodent Control - Year-round roof rat: inspection and number of dwelling units and commercial/industrial properties control at residences upon request, as well as testing are assessed according to their parcel size. The total amount for rodent-transmitted diseases such as Hantavirus, that would be raised by the proposed assessments for fiscal Arenavirus, and Plague. year 2004-05 is $792,410. Community Education - Regularly educate the public about how to protect themselves and their pets from How Was The Assessment Determined? diseases carried by insects and rodents. Presentations, The total cost of the mosquito and disease control services news releases, materials and workshops for schools, that will be funded by the assessments is allocated to each fairs and civic groups. property based on the estimated special benefit received. The method of benefit allocation is based on the relative special Africanized Honeybees~ Yellowjackets &. Stinging benefit in relation to the property's use. Insects - Control of nests on residential and public properties, information on personal safety, prevention, The types of special benefit include: increased public safety, biology and ecology. welfare and protection of health; enhanced quality of life and Emerging Vector Surveillance - Regular monitoring desirability of the area; increased disease prevention for new and emerging public health threats such as the awareness; increased economic activities; protection of tourism Asian Tiger Hosquito, Red imported Fire Ants, and and business activities; and the reduced risk of nuisance and others. liability factors. An engineer's report describing the proposed services, method of assessment, budgets and proposed Rapid Response to Service Requests- Service assessmentsforeachparcelisavailableforreviewattheDistdct technicians arrive and address owner's problems offices located at 13355 Elliot Ave., Chino California 91710. typically within 24 hours of receiving a service request. 10 3 Will This Affect The Environment? The District's abatement and disease prevention efforts Aboutthe West Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District The West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District was involve the use of environmentally friendly approaches, formed in 1983 specifically to reduce and control the Instead of spraying for adult mosquitoes, the District mosquitoes plaguing the communities of Chino, Chino Hills, focuses on using natural materials to control mosquito and southern Ontario and Montclair (the current District larvae at their breeding locations. This mosquito control approach has been found to be environmentally friendly areas). In 1985 the District increased its services in these and is endorsed by the Environmental Protection Agency, .areas to include flies, rodents, stinging insects, and medically the University of California, Centers for Disease Control, ~mportant vectors capable of transmitting disease or causing and others, human discomfort. Property owners within the current District areas pay an annual assessment to fund District services. How Does The District Control Mosquitoes? The District is overseen by a Board of Trustees, with one The District reduces mosquito populations by identifying all member representing each City and one member major sources of mosquitoes and then implementing representing the County areas, environmentally safe measures to eliminate mosquito larvae before they hatch. By focusing on mosquito breeding However, the District lacks adequate funding to provide these locations, the District is able to effectively control mosquitoes same services to property owners outside the District that do before they hatch and begin biting people and animals, not currently pay for services (such as your property). With One of the most common control measures is the use of the rise of emerging diseases such as West Nile Virus, the mosquitofish to eat the mosquito larvae. The Distdct uses Distdct has searched for ways to extend its current operations mosquitofish and other to under-serviced areas in southwestern San Bernardino environmentally safe County. If approved, this Mosquito Control & Disease methods such as natural Prevention Measure will allow the District to adequately serve bacteria that target the these areas and better protect the public health. mosquito larvae but are harmless to people, other animals, and plants. The District also makes service calls upon property owner request to treat local mosquito, stinging insect and roof rat problems. To fund regular testing for diseases carried by mosquitoes, other insects, and rodents 4 To fund removal of dangerous pests such as bees, wasps and snakes West Nile Virus Information West Nile Fever is a disease spread by mosquitoes infected with West Nile Virus. Originally from Africa, the virus first appeared in the United States in 1999 (in New York City). Since then, the virus has spread throughout much of North America, including California. The virus can infect people, livestock and birds. The most serious manifestations of infection are encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), polio- like paralysis and death. Since the virus spreads rapidly and California has already registered three positive human cases (www. westnile.ca.gov), To fund more testing for diseases transmitted by the District is proposing this funding measure to better prepare mosquitoes, such as West Nile Virus for this public health threat. Implementing a year-round mosquito monitoring and control program is currently the only How Does the District Test for Diseases? effective way to reduce the risk of an outbreak of West Nile The District uses several disease surveillance Virus. approaches. Because diseases like West Nile Virus often appear first in wild birds, the District maintains sentinel West Nile Virus Infections and Deaths by Year, in USA chicken flocks in strategic locations throughout its current Nuruberof Huruan Huruan Bird Horse service areas. The sentinel chicken flocks are humanely Year States Case Count Deaths Deaths Deaths and regularly tested for diseases and viruses. 1999 4 62 7 N/A 25 Another disease surveillance approach is the use of 2000 11 83 9 4,305 63 2001 27 149 18 7,332 731 mosquito and insect traps. Insects collected are identified 2002 40 4,156 284 100,000+ 5,000+ and sent to laboratories for disease testing. The District 2003' 46 9,175 230 TBD TBD also traps wild rodents to test for Hantavirus, Arenavirus, · Note: Data for 2003 is as of February 18, 2004. Plague and other diseases. If diseases are discovered, Source:Centers for Disease Control & Prevention the District will inform the public and implement District's PlanforWestNile Virus appropriate response measures. If this ballot measure is approved, the District will regularly Additional Information test for the presence of West Nile Virus in the new service For additional information concerning the proposed areas and will actively control mosquitoes year-round. In services or this ballot proceeding, please call the West addition, the District will start a regular public education Valley Mosquito and Vector Control Distdct at (909) 627- program to inform people about how to better protect 0931. You can also visit the District's website at themselves, their families, and pets from diseases carried by www. wvmosquito.org/to learn more about the District and mosquitoes. its services. [ Additional resources related to West Nile Virus: ~ h~tp://ww~cdc, gov/nddod/dvbid4vestnile/index, htrn http://ww~.westnile.ca.gov h#p://www, mvcac, org/WNV, htrn 5 Where Is the Proposed New Service Area? The proposed mosquito control and disease prevention services are for the clear areas outlined on this map. This clud s the City of Ra ch C d areain e n o ucamongaan the northern portions of the cities of Montclair and Ontario. (The shaded areas currently receive full ............ services from the District.) .. ,, RANCHO CtlCAMONGA If property owners in the proposed service area approve this Mosquito Control and Disease Prevention Measure, '"" funding from the measure will not be generated until the beginning of 2005. Therefore, the District will begin increasing its mosquito control and disease prevention MOfl'rCL~IR services in late 2004. in the event of a public health emergency, such as an outbreak of West Nile Virus, the District will expand its mosquito and disease control ,~?~: ~:: ONTARIO '" services earlier than scheduled. ' To provide mosquito control, roof rat, and ".*'* stinging insect service calls to individual property owners THE CITY OF I~ANCHO ClJCAHON GA StagRe r TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official BY: Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager DATE: April 7, 2004 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) 2004 FORD EXPLORERS, FROM FRITTS FORD, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,256.38, FUNDED FROM THE CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (CEGP), FUND 1244-302-5604 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of two (2) 2004 Ford Explorers, from Fritts Ford, of Riverside, in the amount of $45,256.38, funded from the Code Enforcement Grant Program (CEGP), fund 1244-302-5604. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the acceptance of the Code Enforcement Grant Program funds on February 3, 2004. The grant allowed for the purchase of these two (2) Ford Explorers. The purchase of these two (2) vehicles will have no impact on the General Fund and is 100% funded with grant funds. The Building and Safety Department, Code Enforcement Division, has determined that the specifications that were called out in the Request for Bid (RFB) that was recently completed for Fleet Maintenance will meet the department's needs. For the previous RFB Fleet Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for the vehicles. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Bid and sent it to eight (8) vendors. Seven (7) responses were received. After analysis of the bid responses by the Fleet Maintenance Supervisor and Purchasing Staff, it was determined that Fritts Ford was the lowest, most responsive, responsible bidders that met the specifications required by the Engineering Department, Fleet Division, for the Ford Explorers as highlighted in the attached copy of the abstract of the bid. Page 2 Feb~y 4, 2004 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF THREE (3) 2004 FORD EXPLORERS, FROM FRITTS FORD, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,884.57; ONE (1) 2004 FORD RANGER TRUCK, FROM RAMSEY STREET FORD, OF BANNING, IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,648.39; AND ONE (1) 2004 FORD F-350 4X4 SUPER CAB TRUCK, FROM RACEWAY FORD, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,468.09, FUNDED FROM THE EQUIPMENTNEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 1712-001-5604 The Purchasing Division has confirmed that the vendor will offer the vehicles at the same price for this additional order. The Building and Safety Department therefore requests approval to purchase these two Ford Explorers from Fritts Ford on the same terms, conditions, and pricing. Respectfully submitted, Building and Safety Official ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF STEEL PIPE AND RELATED APPURTENANCES ASSOCIATED WITH WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY PHASES lB(B), 3B(A), AND 3B(B), OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, FROM WEST COAST PIPE LININGS, INC FOR THE AMOUNT OF $116,420.00, AND FROM INLAND WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO. FOR THE AMOUNT OF $49,250.00, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS ~16123035650/1442612-0 AND 16143035650/14426 ~ 4-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the immediate need purchase of steel pipe and related appurtenances associated with water improvements to be constructed in conjunction with Phases lB(b), 3B(a), and 3B(b), of CFD~s 2001-01 and 2003-01. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As par~ of the multi-phased program to install infrastructure benefiting the entire Victoria Gardens Regional Center sphere, it is necessar~ to construct certain public improvements within Foothill Blvd. One such improveme~nt is the nstallation of two water mains to support not only the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, but also development adjacent to the regional center. The regional center and other affected development is dependant upon the installation of these water facilities prior to occupancy occurring on the respective proiects. In late March of this year staff: was informed by the Cucamonga Valley Water District the price and availability of steel pipe has suddenly been impacted by a severe shortage of CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Ph 1Bb, 3Ba, and 3Bb water materials purchase April 7, 2004 Page 2 steel. Subsequent discussions with steel pipe suppliers confirmed this dilemma. According to unrelated sources, a massive shutdown of steel mills in China has created a severe demand from China's building industry on steel produced in United States mills. As such, not only has the price of steel risen dramatically, but large price increases in the steel market are projected for early April as well as in May. In addition, the availability of steel products, including steel pipe, had been impacted. The water district has heard the availability of steel pipe could require as much as 16 weeks for delivery. Should the Foothill Blvd. capital improvement project, which is currently out to bid, provide for the awarded contractor to purchase the steel pipe, the project would run the risk of not having the pipe available within the necessary time frame. This would adversely impact the regional center as well as other affected development. Delaying the delivery of the water pipe until well into this summer would prohibit the timely completion of the Foothill Blvd. improvements, thereby impacting the opening of the regional center as well as the occupancy of equally impacted development. Staff has requested proposals from four suppliers of water main materials. In addition to price quotes, staff required the delivery of the materials within a six-week time frame. This period would coincide with the letting of the contract to improve Foothill Blvd. Of the four suppliers contacted, one supplier could deliver only the pipe within the time frame required, a second supplier could supply the materials but required a non-cancelable letter of intent to secure the purchase, the third could supply only the valves and fittings within the required time frame, and the fourth was unresponsive to our request. Based on the proposals received, West Coast Pipe Linings, Inc. agreed to provide the pipe and certain fittings, and Inland Water Works Supply Co. would supply the remaining materials, all within the required time frame and at March prices, prior to any April price increases. In addition, the two suppliers would not require a non-cancelable letter of intent. Staff has given these two suppliers letters of intent to purchase the materials pending approval of this purchase by the City Council. The letters of intent have locked in the project's required materials at March prices. Funds for this purchase have already been appropriated. Should the City Council not approve this action, staff is prepared to bid the project with the awarded contractor required to furnish the necessary materials. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJ©:WCS Attachments: Vicinity Map PROJECT ~ ~i,-- · SITE ~'~ ~ ~ ~~~ .~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Phase lB(b), 3B(a) and 3B(b) of CFDs 2001-01 and 2003-01 e~'~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES St lff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III DATE: April 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution in Support of an Application for Senior Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B Grant Funds for Senior Services that Promote Socialization RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve the attached Resolution in support of the Community Services Department's application for Senior Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B grant funds for senior services that promote socialization. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services is the Area Agency that assists in the allocation of senior citizen program grants from the California Department of Aging. The Community Services Department has received funding from the County for the past five years. This year, due to County contracting guidelines it is necessary for the County to issue a competitive Request for Applications (RFA) for this funding. It is anticipated that the funding cycle for the RFA will be a one-year grant with options to re-fund for the next three years. The Community Services Department grant application is for continued funding for senior services that promote socialization. Funds received will be used to enhance recreational/social services for senior citizen using the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Specifically we will focus on recreational activities that center on the physical, social, psychological, educational and recreational needs of older persons. In order to proceed with the RFA process, the attached Resolution needs tp be appr~d by our City Council. cK~v~~ Director RESOLUTION NO. 04- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING APPLICATION FOR SENIOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES OLDER AMERICAN ACT TITLE III-B GRANT FUNDS FOR SENIOR SERVICES THAT PROMOTE SOCIALIZATION, WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services is the Area Agency that assists in the allocation of senior citizen program grants from the California Department of Aging; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services is seeking applications from interested and qualified organizations and firms to provide senior supportive services pursuant to Title Ill-B; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services requires applicants to certify by resolution the approval of the submission of an application to the County for funding consideration; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucemonga does hereby approve the filing of an application for Senior Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B grant funds with the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services for the provision of senior services that promote socialization. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April 7, 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7th day of April, 2004. Executed this 7~ day of April, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk -2- T H C I T ¥ 0 I~AN C I1 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Streets, Fleet and Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent Greg Gunski, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVE SOLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION FOR THE PURCHASE OF PARTS, SUPPLIES, AND SERVICES FOR THE VACTOR STORM DRAIN TRUCK, ELGIN STREET SWEEPERS, AND MOBILE STREET SWEEPER FROM HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, OF POMONA, FOR AN ANNUAL TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $35,000.00 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/04, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW ANNUALLY AFTER REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF PRICING, FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UP TO A TOTAL OF THREE YEARS, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1006-303-5250 ($10,000.00) AND 1001-317-5250 ($25,000.00) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve sole source vendor selection for the purchase of parts, supplies, and services for the Vactor storm drain truck, Elgin street sweepers, and Mobile street sweeper from Haaker Equipment Company, of Pomona, for an annual total not to exceed $35,000.00 for fiscal year 2003/04, with an option to renew annually after review and confirmation of pricing, for additional one year periods, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1006-303-5250 ($10,000.00) and 1001- 317-5250 ($25,000.00). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City currently maintains one (1) Vactor storm drain truck, four (4) Elgin street sweepers, and one (1) Mobile street sweeper with parts and services provided from Haaker Equipment of Pomona. The Purchasing Division has confirmed that Haaker is the territorial distributor for all Vactor Company and Elgin Sweeper Company parts for Southern California. Page 2 April 7, 2004Sole Source Vendor Selection for parts, supplies and services from Haaker Equipment Company In previous years, the City pumhased Mobile street sweeper parts from Nixon-Egli Equipment as the sole vendor. The manufacturer of Mobile street sweepers went into bankruptcy in 2002 and was subsequently purchased by Elgin Street Sweeper, which then became the sole source territorial distributor for the Mobile parts. For these reasons, the City will be spending more with Haaker Equipment this year and in the coming years. Staff has secured a schedule of customer service/shop rates that Haaker Equipment has agreed to hold the prices firm through 2006. A copy of the schedule is attached. Respectfully submitted, Willi~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:GV:GG:DH:sm SCHEDULE OF CUSTOMER SERVICE/SHOP RATES A. Shop Repairs - Installation~ Maintenance & Trouble Shooting Price Per Hour 1. Straight Time Rate $82.00 Monday - Friday 6:00 am - 4:00.pm Call out 2 hr mm. 2. Overtime Rate $123.00 Monday - Friday After 4:00 pm Call out 2 hr. min., 4 hr. max. Saturday 6:00 am - 5:00 pm Call out 4 hr min., 8 hr. max. 3. Double Time Rate $164.00 Monday - Friday After 12 hours Saturday After 12 hours Sunday and Holidays Call out 4 hr min. B. Field Repairs - Installation~ Maintenance & Trouble Shootim, 1. Straight Time Rate $86.00 Monday - Friday 6:00 am - 4:00 pm Call out 2 hr min. 2. Overtime Rate $129.00 Monday - Friday After 4:00 pm Call out 2 hr. min., 4 hr. max. Saturday 6:00 am- 5:00 pm Call out 4 hr min., 8 hr. max. 3. Double Time Rate $172.00 Monday - Friday After 12 hours Saturday After 12 hours Sunday and Holidays Call out 4 hr min. C. Welding/Fabrication 1. Straight Time Rate $84.00 Monday - Friday 6:00 am - 4:00 pm Call out 2 hr min. 2. Overtime Rate $126.00 Monday - Friday After 4:00 pm Call out 2 hr. min., 4 hr. max. Saturday 6:00 am - 5:00 pm Call out 4 hr min., 8 hr. max. 3. Double Time Rate $168.00 Monday - Friday After 12 hours Saturday After 12 hours Sunday and Holidays Call out 4 hr min. Conditions: 1. Travel time will include round trip travel from HEC offices and is charged at above hourly rates, plus $0.75/mile 2. Travel and living expenses will be charges at HEC cost plus 10% including round trip cost 3. Shift starting times on overnight calls are customer option: i.e. first 8 hours Monday-Friday is at straight timerate. - 4. For safety reasons, we must limit a shift to 16 hours and a break between shifts of 8 hours or more. Note: All of the above rates are valid for normal services performed within our service area. R A N H O C U C A M O N GA E~NGIN EERIN G DE PART~ EN T Staff:Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Public Services Technician II SUBJECT: Authorize the execution of a Grant of Easement with Southern California Edison Company by the City Manager or his duly appointed representative to provide access rights to the Arbors Electrical Substation located at 8275 Rochester Avenue for operations and maintenance purposes RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Grant of Easement with Southern California Edison Company by the City Manager or his duly appointed representative which will provide Southern California Edison with legal access to the Edison-owned portion of the Arbors Electrical Substation located at 8275 Rochester Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In response to the unstable energy situation in the State of California, the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 31, 2001, authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services. The purpose of this formation was to enable the City to explore options in dealing with energy issues at the local level. Subsequently, on August 21, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the filing of a Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Application with Southern California Edison Company (Edison) for the provision of electric service to the Victoria Arbors development area by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. Since this time, the City Council has approved various actions relating to the full implementation of the Municipal Utility, including authorizing the construction of a jointly owned electrical substation and interconnection facility within the Epicenter's expanded parking lot facility, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GRANTOF EASEMENTWITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON APRIL 7, 2004 PAGE 2 In accordance with Edison's construction policies, the City-owned portion of the substation was built by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Edison-owned portion of this facility was built by a contractor working directly for SCE. On September 17, 2003, the City Council authorized the award of a public works contract to Union Engineering, Inc. for the construction of the City-owned portion of the substation. Edison's contractor began work on the Edison-owned portion of the substation in December 2003. The construction was completed in a timely fashion and, as a result, the substation was energized and initiated into the grid in mid-February. In connection with these construction activities, Edison requested that a right-of-entry agreement be executed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Southern California Edison granting SCE permission to enter and work upon the substation site, as such site is the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently, the City Council authorized the execution of this agreement on November 19, 2003. At present, the substation is fully operational and will be ready to deliver power to the Victoria Arbors Mall Project once the distribution system is constructed, inspected and approved. However, SCE's portion of the substation has been operating as a unit within their greater power grid since February. In order to complete the process that was initiated in the WDAT Application, the City must now approve a Grant of Easement to SCE, which will lend SCE permanent legal access to their portion of the Arbors Electrical Substation for the purposes of maintaining and operating their interconnection equipment. The City Attorney was advised of this request and has reviewed the proposed Grant of Easement submitted by Southern California Edison. This document is now presented to the City Council for its consideration. It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Grant of Easement with Southern California Edison Company by the City Manager or his duly appointed representative for the construction of the electrical substation within the Epicenter expanded parking lot, located at 8275 Rochester Avenue. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. Oq- //~5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO APPROVE A GRANT OF EASEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON REGARDING THE ARBORS ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 8275 ROCHESTER AVENUE. A. Recitals. (i) This Council awarded a contract (No. CO 03-104) for the design and construction of an electrical substation and related facilities in order to launch the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility serving the Victoria Gardens Mall. (ii) The Arbors substation project included certain facilities to be owned and operated by Southern California Edison pursuant to the WDAT Agreement filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (iii) The construction and energization of the Arbors substation has been completed and Southern California Edison has requested a Grant of Easement to provide access to their portion of the substation for the purposes of operations and maintenance. (iii) The purpose of this Resolution is to request approval for the Grant of Easement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Southern California Edison to ensure that operations progress at the substation unhindered. B. Resolution. Section 1. The City Council hereby confirms the facts and information set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution and hereby incorporates them by references in this Resolution. Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the Grant of Easement between the City and Southern California Edison for the Arbors Electrical Substation located at 8275 Rochester Avenue and directs the City Manager or his designee to execute such easement instrument on behalf of the City. Section 3. City staff hereby is directed to ensure that said easement is immediately filed with the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County in relation to the above referenced project. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGINE EDIN C DIVI&ION Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager ~: APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS FROM M & M IRRIGATION SUPPLY, INC., OF CORONA, IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000, FOR THE PERIOD OF APRIL 7, 2004 TI-tROUGH APRIL 6, 2005, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UPON REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF PRICING AND MUTUAL CONSENT, UP TO A TOTAL OF THREE YEARS, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001- 316-5200 ($14,000), 1130-303-5200 ($6,000), 1131-303-5200 ($8,700), 1133-303- 5200 ($7,000), 1134-303-5200 ($9,100), 1136-303-5200 ($1,000), 1137-303-5200 ($4,200), 1140-303-5200 ($1,000), 1700-201-5203 ($4,000), 1848-303-5200 ($20,000) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of irrigation systems repair parts from M & M Irrigation Supply, Inc., of Corona, in an annual amount not to exceed $75,000, for the period of April 7, 2004, through April 6, 2005, with an option to renew for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of pricing and mutual consent, up to a total of three years, to be funded from 1001-316-5200 ($14,000), 1130-303-5200 ($6,000), 1131-303-5200 ($8,700), 1133- 303-5200 ($7,000), 1134-303-5200 ($9,100), 1136-303-5200 ($1,000), 1137-303-5200 ($4,200), 1140-303-5200 ($1,000), 1700-201-5203 ($4,000), 1848-303-5200 ($20,000). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Public Works and Purchasing worked together to develop a biddable list of key irrigation systems repair parts representing the top seventy-five (75) most frequently purchased products used in our irrigation system. From this list a Request for Bid was advertised on February 18, 2004, posted on the City website, and mailed to seven (7) vendors. Four responses were received. Fertilizer, Chemical and Soil Additives Staff Report April 7, 2004 Page Two Of the four vendors responding to the Request for Bid, M & M Irrigation Supply, Inc. submitted the lowest, most responsive and responsible overall bid, with all items meeting the required specification of Public Work. The abstract of the bids is attached. Staff is reconm~ending award of the bid to the lowest, most responsive, responsible bidder, M & M Irrigation Supply, Inc., based on the lowest aggregate total. Respectfully submitted, Willi~ J. O Neil City Engineer W JO:DB:DH:sm ABSTRACT OF SID ;how~ on the bid response Jeff Rarn~s & John Gonzales, Engineering BID NO.: RFB 03/04-007 Irrigation Systems Repair Parts Vendor Nam ~&M Irrigation Supply, Inc. Smith Pipe & Supply 'lydro-Scape Products, Inc. Ewing Irrigation Products .... Contact Nam .~hris Hernandez John White 3army Coats Ted Byrne Phone No. J09-371-1296 )09-984-3337 )09-980-5353 909-937-6868 Yerms' I 2%/30 ITerms: ~let30 ITerms: 2%/30 Terms: Net30 ~ 600 ........ (~.:~.~{~ .................... ~.0~:~. ~o~.q ............................ ~:.~(~z~(~ t22 400c 0.1785( 107100( 0 932 . 115.926C 5 I-l/2" sch 40 PVC 8E p pe .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 450 0.2505( 112.7250 0.3240( 1458000 0.2892( 130.14( 45.000( .......................................... (~"]'~4-~0 0.29299 ................. 131.8455 .......................................... [ .............................................. 300 .......... ~.~ ....................... ~.~ ............................... (~: ~ ~ 31.2000 00904[ 27.120 0 ~ 31.8330 8.5164C 433 6080 6 85200 1 463 4400 6 8690C 51 80 6 85500 1 508 1000 126.000( 0.72700 127,225( 075000 131 250C 0.75900 132.825{ ........................ ~. .................................................................................... ~.~ .... 0.06630 9.9~( 0. ~ ~00 15.0~ 0.11220 16830C 0.13000 19.500~ ................................................................................................................ 90.0~( 0 72700 90 875 0750~ 93 750~ 0.7~900 94.875( ................................................................................................................. 90.00~ 0.72700 ~ 875 075~0 93 7500 0 75900 94 875 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.26700 26 700~ 0 3070 30 7~ .............................................................................................................. 72.~0 0 7270 72 700 0.75~{ 75.00G 07590( 75.900( ................................................................................................................ 100 290( 1.01400 101.40~ 1.06600 106.6000 1.~80( 105.800[ 23 1086~RBCoverAss 18~ 100 1,23830 12383~ '-'-"~:~ ...................... ~'~ .................. ~';~'~' 108,~ 1.5300( 153.000( ........................................... ~ ......... - ............................................................................................... !.~..:~Z~ ......... !..~ZZ:.9.~( ............................................................................................................ ' 72 0000 0.7270( 72.700C 0.7500( 750000 075~ 75.~ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30.760~ 2 307.00~ 31 7620 2 382 5~ 3 9800C 2 398 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1.6200( 121.500 1.6730( 125.475~ 1.8070C 1~.525[ .......... ~ .............. ~...........~ ................................. 7~ .......... ~.~j.~ ...................... !~..~2 ................................ ~.:~[~[ ....................... ~j~.~q ................................... ~ .................. ~'~Z~................ ~...q[~ .............. 31 .~ ~.~;.~..~[~.~[.w~.~ ............................................... ~ ................................. ~.:~ ................... ~:7.~ ............................. .~:.~q~ ................ ~:.~0 ................. ~:~ ................... ~2:~.~.................................... ~;~.~.~ ............. ................................................................................................................. '~ ...................................... ~'~"~ ~.03s, 0.~00~ ~.0000 0.70so s~.~ o.aosoo ................................................................................................................... ~ ................................ q.~[~: ............................ ~=~ ........................ ~Z~0 .................. ~.~ ................................... q:~ ...................... ~=~[ .................................. ~.~ .................. ~3 ~/~.~.~;.~.~.~.~..~E~.~.~ ................................................ ~'~ ................................. ~'~'~ ............................. ~:~ ............................. ~J~P. ..................... ~ .......................................... q:.~R ....................... ~:~9.~ ........................................ ~.~q~ ................ 45 ~.~:~..~[~.~.e.~.~..~.[~.q ............................................... ~.q .................................. q~.[~9 20.62~ 0.419~ 20.950( 0.4~01 22.2~ 0.47500 23.7500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REMARKS: Notes and de'~at~ons on the RFB are highlighted in pink en the copies o he RFB that you have eceived for review ABSTRACT OF BID shown on the bid response I 2 3 4 Vendor Nam M&M Irrigation Supply, Inc. ~mith Pipe & Suppl~ ~ydro-Scape Products, Inc. Ewlng Irrigation Products Contact Name Chris Hernandez Iohn White )army Coats Ted Byme ~ ~.~.2.~[.~..[~.~[~ .................... ~. Te~s: ~/~30 : Net 30 207~30 Net 30 50 ' PVC9OELL~ 40 0.5513( .................................................................................................................................... 22,052{ 0.86000 34.4000 0.~00( ........................... ~:,~ .................... ~:,~ ..................................... ~:~q 24,400( 0.74900 29 9600 53 1" PVC ~ S~r~t ELL ~ 40 0.44500 17.800( 0.69000 27.6~( 0.759~ 30.360[ 0.96200 38.4800 ........................................................................................................................ 6.083( 0.27~ 9.450( 0.2970~ 10395( 0 36000 12.600, ~ ...................................................................................................................... .......~.:~.~ .................... ].~:~ 4.91600 122.9~ ..................................................... ~.-.-~ .................................................................................... :~.~ . 156.393( 6.~200 159.648( 6.86~0 164 856C 6.~500 ............. ........................ ~ ................... ~ ...................................... ~P~ ........................... ~,:~.~.~ ............................... ~:.~. ~ ...................... !:~.~ ....................................... ~:~Z~. ~.33s0 0 33e0 sgc ~ ~2~1 RB Solenoid Ass Bm .................................................................................................................................................. ~.~.:~ ................................... !~.;~.].~.~ 660.570 ............................................ ~ ................ 5 9.6344C ............................................................................................................................. : ....................................................................... 71 I~EFB-CP Rainbird 1 RCV 2aVAC 1 ............................................................................................................................................. ~4.~6700 ~.~67( ~.~3~ 8~.~3~"~:'~0( 89.163~ ..................................................... ~ ........................................................... ~ ................................ 4~eao ~.1~ 4.~000 4.3~0( ......................................................... 128.193~ 2819~ 132.36900 132369( 132.~ 1400 132 140 tax ..................................................................................................................................................... ~.~.~'~ ................................................ :8%~ ................................................................................................................ o,oo 0.~ Prepared by Pamela Pane 3/30/2004 · h ~.~..~_E, .~!~. ........................................................ ~.~ ............................... .~.:J.],!.~ ........................ ~:~ ....... o.~asor 248~400c 012040 216 72~ 0.137~ 248 328r ..................... ~ ................................................................. ~ ..... o~a~ ~.~o~ ........................ ~ ..... ~'~'~ ......................................... ~S~ .................... ~'~ o.~o~ ~.~o~ ........................................................................................ 0.0800 40.0000 0.1200( 60.000 0,0900( 45000{ 0 540~ 7700~ 5H Ra~nb~rd Plastic ~zJe 3~0 ................................. ~'~ .................................................................................................................................... ~:~.R~; .................. ~_~:~g~O ............................. ~:,~9 .............. !,~:.~9~ .................................... ~ .. ~Z ............. ?...~.!:~.~q~ .................................... ~.~.~P~ ..,..._.!.,_~:.~q 1~ Ra[nb]rd Plastlc N~zle 200 072000 1~.00~ 0+72~00 145.400( 0.75000 .................. ~ ....................... : 0,75900 151,8001 ..... ~--~ ...................... .!~ .............................. .q-~ ............................ ~:~ ...................... o~oooo ~5.ooo~ 0.~2~o ~.s3~ o.~3~0 ............................................................................................................................................................................... ~99~9~ .......................... ~:7~ .................. ~.~ ...................................... 9:Z~9~ ..................... ~:Z~R ....................................... 9.~Z~9~ ............... ~:9.~.~ ....................... ~ ............................ ~oo ..................... ~.~s~ ~.~ ~ ~ '*'-'"'~ ...... ~7~ ~.o~ooo ~oe.oo~ ~.~o~ .......................................................................................................................................... ~..~ ..................... ~.~:~ ................... ~ o~4o~ .................. ~.~!.:~.~ ....................................... ~:~ .................. !~-.~.~ ......................................... ~.~ ................ ...... ~..,,.........R ........................................... 75 ........ ~...~J,~ ....................... J,~:~ ..................... 1.3~00 99.1500 1.3970( 104.775{ 2.077~ 155.~50 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... q:*~'~ ..................... ~:'~ .................................... ~:'~ ........................ ~ ................................. ~.~.~ .................. ................................................................................................................................ ~.~Z~ ................ ~].:~Z.~ ...................... ~.~:~.~q ......... ~..9~:~ .............................. ~.~:~ ..... ~...t~:~ .................................. ~ .._.....~..~**~ ~ PVC~OE~L SS ~ 0.~47S0 ~.0~ 0.230~ ~.~0~ 0.~00~ ~.TSOC 0.2~eO0 2~.6000 .............................................................................................................. 0.41380 31.035( 0.~ 48.000( 0.706~ 52.950C 0.80600 60.4501 .............................................................................................................................. ~:~ ........................ ~'-~ ......................... 9'.~Z~ ........... ~:~ ........................................ ~:~_~ ............... ~:~ .................................. ~.~ ............... ...... e.............~ ........................................... ~. .................................. !~q~. ~.s3oo 1.~oo eT.~ ~.~soo ~9.2~o .................. ~..~ ............ ~'~'~"~'~'~ ....................................... ~ ~ ......... ~-'~ ....................... ~ ............................. ~.~.~ ................. ~.~..,.~;~... ~.~ ~.~o~ ............... ~.,~z~ ................ ~.~. ~.~.~.~.~ ............................................ '"'"'"~'~ .............................. o.~.~ ~o.~oo o.~o~ ~o.~oc~ .............. ~"~ ...................... ~"~ ................... o..~so~ ~ ..................................................................................................................................................................................... ~:~.~ ........................................................................................... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REMARKS: Notes and deviations en the RFB ere highlighted in pink on the cbeles of Ihe RFB tha Y~u have ece red or review For consistency, numbers have been carried oul to the sarr~ decimal place, so totaJs ~y va~ s oh y from the {ota~ A~STRACT OF BID shown ~ the bid mspo~e Jeff Barnes & John Gonzales, Engineeri~ BID f ~ppo~ioned to and ~s~ed by the City 1 2 3 4 Vendor Nam~ M&M Irrigation Supply, Inc. Smith Pipe & Supply Hydro-Scape Products, Inc. Ewing Irrigation Products Contact Nam~ Chris Hernandez John White Danny Coats red B~e Phone N~ 909-371.1296 909-984-3337 90~98~5353 )09-937~8 ,croNe ~' ~-~.[~-~' .......................... ~.~. ~/~30 ~ ~Model Terms: Net 30 Model Te~ms: 2o/~30 Model TermS:unit Cost~ NetE~. Cost30 ~ 48 1" x 6" Pvc sch 80 N pp · TBE 50 0 20000 10.000( 020400 10.200( 0.24600 12.3000 0.4000 20 0~ 50 1" PVC 90 ELL ~ 40 ........................... _ . . 055000 22 000O See N0 e 0.9660( 38 640 ............................. 0.86000 34 4~ 0 94000 52 ranch Wire C~n~ o .......................................................... 0.17900 7.1600 0.2510C 10.040( 0.445~ 17.800( ........................................................................................................................... .............................................................. 0.6900 27.600C 0.7590( 30.3600 0.96200 38.480 ., ' ....................... ~;~ ~ ...................................... ~ ............................................................................................................... ~;~,~8( 132.9950 .................. 57 ~ainblrd 18~ PRS-SAM Pop-ups 24 6 5 64 156.3936 6.6520C 159.6480 6.8690~ 64.~E 6 ~500 164 520 ..................................................................................................................... 26.2 85 657000 328500 7.50400 37.520( ...................... ................................................ ~ .............. s 0 ~370 0.~ ...................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ~:~ ..................... ~:~ .................... 0.~4300 ~2~so 0.30~ ~.s40~ 68 I~ ................................................. Pt 2721 Blue Low VOC~ .......................................... Cern ~1 ...................................... ~;~9 .......................... ~:,~,~( .....................................................................................................9.43600 47,18~ ............................................................................................................................................................ 11.94600 59.7300 170~0 ~ 85*000( 4.25270 ....... ~ ' 2.9400( 2.~0( 3.36000 3.3600 3.1000( .................... ~;.~( 72 1419 Ca son G een Ud Onl ............................................ , .................. 89.1~0 97,0200C 97,020( 74 ~unter 1-20 ADS 1 11.4029( 114029 11.5230~ 11.5230 11.898~ 11,898( 1/.~000 11,770C . 304393[ 30.4393 30 76000 30.7600 ............................... N .~:~"~ade on'~i~: .................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................... 18,4~.361 18 879 77 9 466 907 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA REMARKS: Notes and deviat;ons o~ Ihe RFB are highlighted in pink c~ the copies of the RF0 t~at y~u have received for review For consist enc¥, nu~nbers have been carried out to the same decimal place, SO tot als mey vary s}ightly from the to~al ABSTRACT OF BID shown en the bid response. RECEIVED FOR: T~ere has been a deduction ffc~n the total of he OCal bidde , Hyd o-Scape, fe~ the sales tax which wculd be ~ppon[0ned to and received by the City Jeff Barnes & John Gonzales BID NO.: RFB 03/04-007 Irrigation Systems Repair Pa,frs 1 2 3 4 Contact M&M Irrigation Supply, Inc. Ire-Scape Products, Inc. Phone No Danny Coats 2%/30 Ne{ 30 Terms: ~Jet 30 Description of Jtems to quote Ext. Cost Ext. COst Unit Cost Ext. Cost Unit Cost Ext. Cost h 40 PVC BE Pipe ' sch 40 PVC BE Pipe !" Marlex 90 St reel ELL TT I-1/2' sch 40 PV( 0.09000 -- 15H Rainbird Plastic Nozzle ;h 40 PVC BE F 1/4' sch 40 PVC BE P __ 806-PRS-SAM Rainbird PR w/chk 0.241 0.27528 Inst Rotr ~s Nozzle 31.98000 __ 10H Rainbird Plastic Nozzle 1440 1.0660(3 1.05800 __ 12H Rainbird Plastic Nozzle 0.75000 0.70900 0zzle 0.11220 __ 100 Ralnbicd Plastic NozzJl __ J*12H Rainbird U-Senes Nozzle __ 15F Rainbir~3 Plastic Nozzle Inst Rotr t .06600 Prepared by PameJa Pane 3,30/2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REMARKS: Notes and dev(afions on Ihe RFB are highlighted in pink on the ccpies of he RFB ha yx3u have received lot review· For consistertcy, numbers have been camed out to the same dec~rnal place, so tota)s r~z~y var7 slightly f om he o a ABSTRACT OF BID shown on the bid response· RECEIVEO FOR: There has been a ded~c~i°"m {rom the total of the local bidder Hydro-Scape o tl3e s~{es ax which would be Vendor Name M&M Irrigation Supply, Inc. Smith Pipe & Supply ~ydro-Scape Products, Inc. Ewing Irrigation Products Contact Name Chris Hernandez Iohn White ' )army Coats Ted Byrne Phone No. 909-371-1296 J00-984-3337 909-980-5353 909-937-6868 izem .~--~ ~!~!.~..~[.!!~..!~.~ .................... P~.... ~ ~ Terms: ' Net 30L'~'~=~~ 2%/30 ...... . ............... Model -~'~os~ Ext. Cost 50 ' PVC 90 ELL TT ............................................................................................................................. (~:4.(~{~C_ ................... ~.~:.(~0~, .9 ........................................ {~:~.0.(~ 22.0OO( See Note 0.9660(3 38640(] ................................................................................................. ~,~ 0.5513[ 22.052( 0.SOO0Q 344000 0.94006 37.600( ................................................................ ~ .1~ ... 0.14100 5640 0 1790C ............................................................................. ................................................. (~:~:~7.7.~ 21.508{ 0,52800 21.1200 0.6100(] 24.4006 0.74900 299600 .................................................. [~:.~.9.~0 27·600( 075900 30·3606 0.96200 38 480O .................... 132998( 491600 22900( 558600 39650(] 757 OO 99275( · ..................... ~ ............................................................................ ~.~.0. .......... ~,4.~ ~ ..... ~7.67900 353.990¢ t 9.253oo ............... .3..~. !~ .. ~ 20.979~ .............. ~'~ ~'~ ........................ · ..................................................................................... 5 5.24370 26.2186 6.5700( 32.850C ........... ~.:~?~ .00. 37.5200 ....................................... 0.17750 ....... .0.§§Z. 0.2100 I OO0C 023400 1.1700 0.2830( 4 8 ............................................................................................................... 1.20OO 0.2670( 1.3351 0 3380( 1 690( 64 I0692001 RB Solenoid Ass Bm .................... ' ......................................................................................................................................................................... 132.1t 49( .............. ~6.~:.~.~ ........................................................ ~ .......................................... 5 ...................... 21.6129( 108.0645 17.56OO~ 87.9OO~ 2O.8500( 104,250 ................................ 537.1650 109.6910(] 548 4950 327 O~ ...................... ~66 355 ................................. ................................................. ~ ........................ ~.~c ~,~ ~'~ ~"~'~ ~ ~.~-~-~ ..................................... ;..~_~_~ ................. ~.~.~ 71 ~EFB-CP Rainbird 1 RCV 24VAC 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 7.~9~ ~.94600 ...................... ~;~ .................. A~ ~.~0 ..................................... 86.~300 86.343( 89.16300 89.163C .......................................................................................................... ~ ~25,946~o ~ ....................... ................ 7~ ~.~,~-20*~s ~ .............................................................................. .. ~300 ~.~9( ~.oo~oo ~32.~oo~ 132~"~'~ ....................................................................................................................................................... ~.~. ~ .... 11.402~ I 523~ 11.523( 11.89800 11.8980 11.770~ ....................................... 30.76000 30 760( 3 76200 3 .7~0 31.9800 31.98~ ~!~c~.~. on ~diSonal Items ......... ' ~nufactum - see ~ ~'~"~' ............... ~;~ .................................... : ............... : ......................... 7 ................................................................................... ~..~ ~otations made o~'~'~: ........................................................ :,~,~, ~ ~.~ .............. ~ ~,~}~a~ No drsc~nts o e ed ~f of ~he e~ P ov dad Prepared by Pan~la Pane 3/30/2004 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ~NGINEERINC DEPART~IENT StaffR DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineering SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15948, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 6TM STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE SUBMITTED BY HARTWELL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, OWNER. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 15948, located on the North Side of 6ta Street, East of Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4), Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 2003 for the division of 10 acres into 2.parcels. Parcel Map 15948 was approved by City Council on March 17, 2004 Parcel 1 is already developed. Public improvements al th ' ong 6 Street frontage on Parcel 2 will be constructed at the time Parcel 2 develops. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION Wil(ia~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:tch Attachments 77 N.T.S. Parcel Map 1594~ City of Rancho Cucamon.qa RESOLUrIONNO. Oz4- ! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15948 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caiifomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article xrnD of the Constitution of the State of Califomia ("Article XIIID') establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements ) and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 15948 - HARTWELL CORPORATION April 7, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIlD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed Thc Owner of the Property is: HARTWELL CORPORATION, A California Corporation The legal description of the Property is: THE EAST ½ OF LOT 13, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS FURTHER DEFINED AS PARCEL MAP 15948, PARCELS 1 AND 2. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 0209-211-19-0-000, 0209-211-27-0-000 The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAU'qTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 SEC._ I LOT I 5 I I T. 1 S_,jI P~2 7. I -- ~ · N ~42'~" ~ 2~1.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOaTit COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ?ARCEL M/'-,? 15"~-~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004) For Project: PM 15948 Number of Lamps Stree[ Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 ...... SLD#6 ...... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B --- NO ADDITIONS TO WORK PROGRAM AT THIS TIME. Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 2.24 A.C. 4.48 2.24 2.24 2 7.16 A.C. 14.32 7.16 7.16 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l~nd Use Unit Tyne Unit~ Unit~ Factor lTnit~ Unit Revemm Comm/1nd Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 15948) is: 9.4 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $3,316.32 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I and ll~e Nnit Tyne llnitq llnlt~ Factcw l I'niC~ llnit Rewmle Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 15948) is: 9.4 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $167.04 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and ll~e l~'nit Tyne llnits lTnit~ Factor llnit~ l)'nit Revenne Comm/Ind Acm 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 15948) is: 9.4 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $483.16 Annual Assessment C-2 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR PARCEL MAP 15948 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O"NElL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 31sz day of March 2004, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the temtory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 31sz day of March 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CItY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I~ NC IN l~l~l~l N G D I~ pAD Ti~ii~T Staf:f Re rt DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2003-00869, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the Improvement Agreement, Securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2003-00869, in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003. This project is for the development of a vocational technical education facility of 189,362 square feet on 17.87 acres of land. The Developer, Atlas Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00869 April 7, 2004 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $ 769,200.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 384,600.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~mJ. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:W¥:teh ^ttachments .N CITY OF " rrEM: ~ RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA ~rm, m ~ k-mlGIN~.k~ING DIVIMION SOt UTtON NO. 19 q-- 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2003-00869. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on April 7, 2004, by Atlas Development Corporation, as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and 6t~ Street; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows 1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney SO ION NO. ¥-- /t9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2003-00869 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2003-00869 - ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, April 7, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIHD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNC1L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: UNI-TECH (CA) QRS 15-64, INC. The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 466 RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20000108528 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXPECTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 772.65 FEET TI-~REOF. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXHIBIT"A" - ~ ASsEssMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRiCT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .o~'ri, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST^T~. OF C^L~FOnN~^ ~P/ed~-~V~/~9 ~'~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLMD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLMD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been detrermined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004) For Project: DRC2003-00869 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLIVlD # 1 -- 9 ...... SLMD # 6 ...... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B --- ....... 24 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 17.87 35.74 17.87 17.87 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Comra/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.00 2115.92 $352.80 $746,469.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00869) is: 17.87 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $6,304.54 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Tand Use Ifnit Tyne l~'nit~ D'nit~ Factor ' ltnit~ Ilni~ Revenne Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00869) is: 17.87 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $635.10 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue CommJInd Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (DRC2003-00869): 17.87 Acre x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $918.52 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M © N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 16033, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SUBMITTED BY O & S HOLDINGS, L.L.C., - APN: 0229-021-62, 63 AND 64. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map No. 16033 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map No.16033 located on the southeast and southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard was approved by the Planning Commission on September 24, 2003, for the subdivision of 15 parcels on 60 acres of land. The Developer, O & S Holdings, L.L.C., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 16033 - O & S HOLDINGS, L.L.C. April 7, 2004 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $940,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: $470,050.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office RespecI!ully submitted, · City Engineer WJO:JS:th SUbj, LEGEND Subject Site- Proposed Shopping Center ~,/ Ma.~or Streets ~,~ /%/ City Boundary RESOLUTION NO. ~)q- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16033, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Parcel Map 16033 submitted by O & S Holding, a California Corporation and consisting of i5 Parcels on 60 acres of land located at the southeast and southwest comers of Day Creek Blvd and Foothill Blvd. was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on September 24, 2003 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16033 is the final map of Tentative Parcel Map No. 16033; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by O & S Holdings, L.L.C., as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 16033 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16033 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIlID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Temtory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 16033 - O & S HOLDINGS, L.L.C., April 7, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the ievy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: O & S HOLDINGS, L.L.C., The legal description of the Property is: Parcel Map No. 16033 being a subdivision of the land described as follows: Portions of northwest quarter of section 8, Township South, Range 6 West, San Bemardino County Development as Parcels 2, 3 and 4. Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area. /07 Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 200312004) For Project: PM 16033 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ............... SLD # 3 ............... Community Trail Tuff Non-Tuff Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B ......... 325 *Existing items installed with original project Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l.~nd lIse l]'n~t Tyne llnlts lTnlts F~crnr Nnits [Tnit Revenue ComrWind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 $771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcel Map 16033) is: 62.67 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $22,109.98 AnnuaI Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and Ilse Tlnit Tv~e llnit~ 1 Inits Factor 1 lnits Ilnit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PARCEL MAP 16033) is: 62.67 acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $2,227.29 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00 Multi-Family Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,84660 C onunercial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 TOTAL $254,339.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (PM 16033): 62.67 acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $5,909.78 Annual Assessment c-2 lit9 [~ A NC H O C U C A M O N GA ~ N C IN E I~I~IN C D E PAD TH g N T StaffRe rt DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Mauager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUB~: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT NO. 16374 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION - APNS: 227-161- 28,31,33,35,36,38 AND 227-171-08,11,12,20,22,23,25 RECOMNIENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16374, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract No. 16374 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) located on the southeast corner of Baseline Road and Victoria Park Lane was approved by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2001 for the development of 555 single family lots. Tract No. 16374 allows for the construction of 25 single family residences. The Developer, Standard Pacific Corporation will be constructing 25 single family residences and has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee their portion of construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Standard Pacific Development (ROW2004-00350) Faithful Performance Bond $362,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $181,000.00 Itl CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16374 April 7, 2004 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Respectfully submitted, W' li~vh J. O'Neil City Engineer WIO:JS:tch Attachments 112 TRACT NO. 15948 TRP~CT NO, 15947 0 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 15716 PItEPAIE~) ~ ~ ~13I~J[2[i:~] =,,,=~, TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS~ A RESOLUTION OF TI-~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16374, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tract Map 16374 (Phased Tract of Tentative Tract No. 15974) submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation and consisting of 25 single family homes located at the southeast comer of Baseline Road and Victoria Park Lane was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 7, 2001 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16374 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map No. 15974; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Standard Pacific as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16374 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~)~-/t[~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16374 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territorY to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territorY to the Maintenance District, Article XllID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "TerritorY") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and 115 RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 16374 April 7, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as proscribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Ten/tory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such pamel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: TRACT NO. 16374, BEING A SUBDMSION OF Al I. PARCELS 12 AND 13; AND A PORTION OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15641, AS SHOWN ON MAP FtI.ED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 192, PAGES 93 TO 100, INCLUSIVE; AND A PORTION OF LOT 16 IN BLOCK "S" OF ET1WANDA COLONY LANDS, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN MAP BOOK 2, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 117 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena ParkTown Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. B-1 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/20045 For Project: Tract 16374 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ............... SLD # 3 11 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L2 ......... 51 *Existing items installed with original project Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422~00 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 5060 1.00 5060 $422.00 $2,177,520.00 Family Multi- Parcel 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00 Family Corem/Ind. Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $422.00 $37,287.92 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84 TOTAL $2,302,791.76 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16374) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $10,550.00 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l~and lT~e ITnit Tyne l}'nil~ ITnit~ Factor lInit~ lTnit Ravenue Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Family Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Family Commercial Acm 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16374) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $444.25 Annual Assessment C-l' Exhibit C (Continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3(VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,anfl l}'se Unit Tyne l~'nit~ Tfnitg Factor lYnitg Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00 Multi- Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,846.60 Family Commercial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 TOTAL $254,339.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16374) is: 25 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,178.75 Annual Assessment [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTNENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~'~') BY: SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AT-GRADE CROSSING AGREEMENT (WITH CROSSING SIGNAL EQUIPMENT) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SIXTH STREET AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, CPUC CROSSING #002-98.10C, LOCATED EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WEST OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD, ACROSS BNSF'S RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGNATED AS MP 96.10,LS 7600, DOT NO. 026326R RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the At- Grade Crossing Agreement (With Crossing Signal Equipment) between the City and BNSF, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the proposed widening improvements to the Sixth Street At-Grade Railroad Crossing, CPUC Crossing #002-98.10-C, located, east of Archibald Avenue and west of Lucas Ranch Road, across BNSF's right-of-way designated as MP 98.10.LS.7600 DOT No. 026326R BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Execution of this agreement is required prior to constructing improvements to the railroad crossing which include; rehabilitation of the railroad tracks, placing of concrete crossing panels, and the installation of new railroad crossing signals and activation equipment and street improvements. These improvements are funded with Measure I funds and will be constructed with the Sixth Street storm drain, street widening, traffic signal, and utility underground improvements. When completed, Sixth Street will be striped for two lanes in each direction from Archibald Avenue, west of the BNSF tracks to Hermosa Avenue east of the tracks. /2.2. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: BNSF Agreement April 7, 2004 Page 2 The City will be responsible for the acquisition and installation costs of the crossing signal equipment in the amount of $157,639.00 and the construction costs for the new concrete crossing surface in an amount of $91,733.00. These costs with bill funded from Account No. 11243035650/1081124-0 (Transportation). i~~s~.2~c, tf u Ily submitted, City Engineer W JO:CH Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution 6TH STREET STORM DRAIN, RAILROAD CROSSING AND PAVEMENT REHAB. (FROM ARCHIB~,I,n AVENUE TO +380' WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE) 6TH ST 4THST PROJECT SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q VICINITY MAP /.2q RESOLUTION NO. ~)Zl/" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AT GRADE CROSSING AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS TO SIXTH STREET AT-GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING, CPUC CROSSING #002-98.10-C, LOCATED EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WEST OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD, ACROSS BNSF'S RIGHT OF WAY, DESIGNATED AS MP 98.10, LS7600, DOT NO. 026326R WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), for the proposed widening improvements to the Sixth Street at-grade railroad crossing, CPUC Crossing #002- 98.10-C, located east of Archibald Avenue and West of Lucas Ranch Road, across BNSF's right-of-way, designated as 98.10, LS7600, DOT No. 026326R. WHEREAS, the Agreement is for the construction and maintenance of at-grade railroad crossing improvements that include automatic signal protection system, track structure, and crossing pad surfacing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Agreement between BNSF and City for the construction and maintenance of at-grade railroad crossing improvements be hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT St ffReport DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~"~-. BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechnicF~¢~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $74,236.21 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,423.62 FOR THE BERYL COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM HILLSIDE ROAD TO NORTH OF ALMOND STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11103035650/1436110-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $74,236.21 to the apparent Iow bidder, Dye and Browning Construction, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,423.62, for the Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to North of Almond Street, to be funded from Beautification funds, Account No. 11103035650/1436110-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 2, 2004, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $98,650.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds ail bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Award Beryl Community Trail Project April 7, 2004 Page 2 The construction of this project is to construct a community equestrian trail including retaining curbs, trail run-off deflector, adjustment of existing utilities to new grade, and the installation of a PVC rail fence. The contract documents call for twenty-five (25) working days to complete this construction project. Respectfully submitted, - v~i~am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 2, 2004 APPARENT LOW BIDDER ENGINEERS COST Dye and Browning Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to North of Almond Street ESTIMATE Construction Inc. Laird Construction Co., Inc. UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Clearmo & Grubb ng (~nc udes a remova s, rtmmtng shrubs and trees, 1. I LS unclassifiedexcavation/fill, disposal and grading) $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $11,777.84 $11,777.84 $8,253.00 $8,253.00 2. 380 CY Remove existing dirt and replace with 4-tach thick decomposed granite matenals(DG.)Compacted90% $35.00 $13,300.00 $54.20i $20,596.013 $100.001 $38,000.00 3. 10 SF Construct 6-inch PCC to eliminate ponding $20.001 $200.00 $4.93J $49.313 $20.00i $200.00 4. 400 SF Saw cut and construct 6" thick concrete apron, transverse medium broom finish $8.00 $3,200.00 $5.10 $2,040.00 $5.00 $2,000.00 5. ES Saw cut existing wall and re-stucco end of wall to match existing $2,000.00 i $2,000.00 $1,150.57 $1,150.57 $750.00 $750.00 6. 110 LF Construct txail mn-offdeflector per detailon sheet No. 5 $25.00 $2,750.00 $15.20 $1,672.00 $35.001 $3,850.00 7. 12 EA ~'djust pull boxes, cable box, valves, manholes, water meter, and sewer I :lean out to new grade $200.00 $2,400.00 $247.20, $2,966.40 $150.001 $1,800.00 8. 1480 LF install PVC 2-rail fence per City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Draw/ng $40.00 No 1010-A, complete in place $59,200.00 $20.77 $30,739.60 $18.25 $27,010.00 9. 3 EA Relocate signs to proper locations, (field adjust) $200.00 $600.00 $278.10 $834.30 $75.00' $225.00 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,410.201 $2,410.20 $1,250.001 $1,250.00 TOTAL : $98,650.00 [ $74,236.21 I $83,338.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 2, 2004 Beryl Community Trail fi'om Hillside Road to North of Almond Street ACCU Construction Sol Construction, Inc. UNIT ~ UNIT l~lO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST ~ AMOUNT COST AMOUNT unclassifiedCIearing & Grubbing (includes all removals, trimming shrubs and trees, I 1. 1 LS excavation/fill, disposal and grading) $15,000.001 $15,000.00 $11,000.001 $11 Remove existing dirt and replace with 4-inch thick decomposed granite 2. 380 CY materlals (DG.) Compacted 90% $75.001 $28,500.00 $129.70 $49,286.00 3. 10 SF Construct 6-inch PCC to eliminate ponding $6.00! $60.013 $11.00' $110.00 4. 400 SF Saxv cut and construct 6" thick concrete apron, transverse medium broom 1 finish $6.00 $2,400.013 $4.36 $1,744.00 5. LS Saw cut existing wall and re-stucco end of wall to match existing $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $255.00! $255.00 6. 1113 LF Construct trail run-off deflector per detail on sheet No. 5 $15.00 $1,650.00 $21.00 $2,310.00 7. 12 EA ~djust pull boxes, cable box, valves, manholes, water meter, and sewer $200.00 $2,400.00 $31.50 $378.00 :lean out to new grade I 8. 1480 LF ~qo.tnstalll010-A,PVC 2-railcompletefenCeinPerplaceCity of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawing $21.001 $31,080.00 $20.25 . $29,970.00 9. 3 EA Relocate signs to proper locations, (field adjust) $200.001~ $600.00 $31.00r $93.00 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $500.001 $500.00 ~ TOTAL I $86,890.00 i $95,646.00 ~ Page 1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 2, 2004 Beryl Comnmnity Trail from Hillside Road to North of Ahnond Street Mega Way Enterprises Coons Construction UNIT BID iCORRECTE[ UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing & Grubbing (includes all removals, trimming shrubs and trees, unctassifiedexcavation/lill, disposaland grading) $8,000.00[ $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Remove existing dirt and replace with 4-inch thick decomposed granite 2. 380 CY materials (DG.)Compacted 90% $140.00 $53,200.00. $53,200.00 $115.00' $43,700.00 3. I0 SF Construct 6-inch PCC to eliminate ponding $28.001 $280.00i$280.00 $35.00 $350.00 4. 400 SF Saw cut and construct 6" thick concrete apron, transverse medium broom finish $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $15.00' $6,000.00 5. ] LS Saw cut existing wall and re-stucco end of wall to match existing $700.00, $700.00 $700.00 $4,000.00. $4,000.00 6. 110 LF Construct trail m-off deflector per detail on sheet No. 5 $24.001 $2,640.00! $2,640.00 $20.00i $2,200.00 7. 12 EA ^djust pull boxes, cable box, valves, manholes, water meter, and sewer $16.21 $24,000.00 $125.00 $1,500.001 $1,500.00 $300.00i $3,600.00 clean out to new grade 8. 1480 LF NolnStalll010-A,PVC 2-railcompletefenCeinPerplaceCity or' Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawing $23,990.80 $20.00i $29,600.00 9. 3 EA Relocate signs to proper locations, (field adjust) $75.001 $225.00~ $225.00 $200.00 $600.00 10. 1 LS Traffic Control $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TOTAL $97,045.00i $97,035.80 I $113,050.00 Page 2 BERYL COMMUNITY TRAIL (FROM HILLSIDE ROAD TO NORTH OF ALMOND STREET) .4 z > 4TH SI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q VICINITY MAP I' H E C I T Y 0 F ~I CII 0 U tlC^I~I Oiq GA Slaff Report DAllY: April ?, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGRFFMENT TO DEDICATE AN ~ FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR JACK BENNY DRIVE THROUGH THE EDISON POWER CORRIDOR TO THE WEST OF DAY CRb-'A'K CHANNEL SUBMIITED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ON BEHALF OF ~ DEVELOP]~ GUARDIAN STORAGE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving the subject agreement and accept the proposed easement terms and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement the city engineer to sign said easement on behalf of the city and the city clerk is authorized to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: DRCDR00-17, located on the north side of Arrow Route and adjacent to the west side of Day Creek Channel in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 28, 2001. Guardian Storage Centers, developers of DRCDR00-17, a recreational vehicle storage facility, were conditioned to dedicate an easement for Jack Benny Drive (Day Creek Boulevard), the alignment of which borders the north property line of the site. The site address is 12050 Arrow Route and the property has frontage on Arrow Route along the south property line. Southern California Edison is the owner of an easement deed for this site (APN:229-021-47) as well as for the site immediately north (APN:229-021-53). Therefore, Southern California Edison has provided the subject agreement to dedicated an easement for road purposes for Jack Benny Drive, 88-feet full width through the 310-feet wide power comdor west of the Day Creek Channel, at such time as street improvements are ready to be constructed. City Council Staff Report DRCDR00-17 April 7, 2004 Page 2 As security for the future improvements to Jack Benny Drive, the Developer has deposited a contribution in-lieu of construction in the amount of $50,901 for the future construction of the south one-half of Jack Benny Drive across their northern frontage. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MNB:tch Attachment /3z i //' City of Item: Staff Report Rancho Cucamonga Title; vicinity Map ENGINEERING EXHIBIT 1: Road Easement DIVISION Jack Benny Drive 4 PORTION OF LOTS 106 AND 107, MAP OFROCblESTER, MAP BOOK 9, PAGE 20, CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFO~ JOg O,R. 8378/155 A PN FUTURE JACK BENNY DRIVE JO8 ~ O.R. B093/141 ~ SOUTH LINE LOT 105 PER I 9/20 . -~ ARRO~ ROUTE C/L OF ARROW ROUTE PER ALPINE CONSULTANTS INC DRAWING 0 100 20O 40O LEGEND SCALE IN FEET I I~NDS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ~,~,, ~ ROAD EASEMENT TO THE CI~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Areo= 27287 S~Ft = 0.6264 Acres PROJECT NAME: WEST LUGO - MIRA LOMA 500 KV T/L M.S, 55-9~ ~P ~ F,B. REF:O,R. 8093/141-142, O,R. 8~78/155-156 ICI~: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAWN BY: J,RUTHER ISURV~ED BY: NA COUNt: SAN BERNARDINO ~.__ RESOLUTION NO. ~)~/" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR DRCDR00-17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Agreement by Southern California Edison Company as owner, for the dedication of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Jack Benny Drive, 310-feet long, through the Edison corridor West of Day Creek Channel.; and WHEREAS, the agreement to dedicate said easement, described in said Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is being done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRCDR00-17; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Easement submitted by Southern California Edison be the same, and the City Engineer is hereby authorized to sign said Easement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto. THE CITY OF I~ANCflO CUCA~ONGA Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buffer, City Planner BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NORTON-FISHER HOUSE LEASE AG REEMENT- A lease agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the West End Family Counseling Services to establish an office use within the Norton-Fisher House. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the West End Family Counseling Services for the use of the Norton-Fisher House. BACKGROUND On September 21,1988, the City Council designated the Norton-Fisher House a local landmark. In 2001, the Etiwanda School District developed the property around the house for the Grapeland Elementary School, and relocated the house to its current location. During the last year various preservation efforts have been completed (i.e., painting the exterior, replacing the roof, repairing and/or replacing windows and doors, and removing interior debris). The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program has p~:ovided additional funds for the restoration and historic preservation of the house. These funds will be used to complete various interior and exterior improvements. On April 22, 2003, the City Council Public Works Committee met with staff to discuss improvements to the Norton-Fisher House. The Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the concept for a Lease Agreement that would be between the City and any future tenant of the structure. The most recent action occurred on February 11,2004, when the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015, a request by West End Family Counseling Services to establish an office use within the historic Norton-Fisher House. The Conditional Use Permit will allow the applicant to complete on-site improvements and renovate the interior of the structure to operate their family counseling program. On-site activities will include counseling, parent education, and training seminars. Conditions of approval forthe Conditional Use Permit require the applicant to enter into a lease agreement with the City prior to the issuance of any permits or the construction of any physical improvements to the Norton-Fisher House. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NORTON-FISHER HOUSE LEASE AGREEMENT April 7, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS The Lease Agreement for the historic Norton-Fisher House was prepared by the City Attorneys' Office at the request of the Planning Department. The Agreement establishes: use of the premises; term and commencement date; rent; taxes and operating costs; tenant improvement, alterations, and maintenance; and responsibilities of the parties regarding damage, insurance, indemnity, access, assignment, default, subordination, and damage or destruction. The Lease Agreement was provided to the applicant, who has had the opportunity to review and accept its terms and conditions; terms of the Agreement were also discussed with the Etiwanda Historical Society. The applicant eagerly awaits approval of the Lease Agreement, and has retained Williams Chiao Architects to prepare plans for interior improvements of the structure. Additionally, the Etiwanda Historical Society is encouraged by the tenant's efforts to rehab the structure and will be available for assistance in the restoration and historic preservation of the Norton-Fisher House. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the City Council approve the Lease Agreement through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG:Is Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Resolution Approving the Lease Agreement RESOLUTION NO. ~)/~'~'//~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF THE NORTON- FISHER HOUSE AS AN OFFICE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 0227-131-24. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed a request for an Agreement between the City and West End Family Counseling Services, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Agreement is referred to as "the agreement." 2. On May 5, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed request to designate the Norton-Fisher House, located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue a Historic Landmark, and following the conclusion of their review, adopted Resolution 88-07 thereby recommending to the City Council that said application be approved. , 3. On September 21,1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed a request to designate the Norton-Fisher House a Historic Landmark, and following the conclusion of their review, approved the application, and adopted Resolution 88-406. 4. On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015 to establish an office use in the Norton-Fisher House, and following the conclusion of their review, approved the application, and adopted Resolution 04-21. Conditions of approval require a Lease Agreement between the City and West End Family Counseling Services for use of the structure as an office. 5. On April 7, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed the request to approve the Lease Agreement between West End Family Counseling Services and the City of Rancho Cucamonga and concluded their review on that date. 6. A true and correct copy of the proposed Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council wishes to foster and encourage a program of Community supported historic preservation and awareness for the benefit of the City's present and future residents.. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. NORTON-FISHER HOUSE AGREEMENT April 7, 2004 Page 2 3. The West End Family Counseling Services also shares the City's goal of community historic preservation and has a desire and willingness to undertake the restoration and operation of the Norton-Fisher House, a designated City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark. 4. This Council hereby approves of the' Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and authorizes the Mayor to sign for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-3101 Attn: Owen P. Gross, Esq. APN: A portion of 227-131-24 [Space Above For Recorder's Use Only] Landlord declares that this Norton-Fisher House Lease is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Califomia Government Code Section 27383. NORTON-FISHER HOUSE LEASE TI-I/S NORTON-FISHER HOUSE LEASE (this "Lease") is made and entered into as of April 7, 2004 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation ("Landlord"), and the WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation ("Tenant"). RECITALS: A. Landlord is the owner of the real property commonly known as 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Land"), together with the improvements located thereon commonly known as the Norton-Fisher House (the "Building"). B. City acquired the Land and the Building (collectively, the "Premises") for the purpose of preserving the Building, which had been designated as a City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark, for the benefit of present and future residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. Tenant desires to lease the Premises from Landlord for the purpose of restoring and preserving the Building and providing programs and services to the community. D. Landlord desires to lease the Premises to Tenant on the terms and conditions set forth herein. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows: 1. AGREEMENT OF LEASE; USE OF PREMISES. 1.1 Upon the "Commencement Date" (as defined below), Landlord leases the Premises to Tenant and Tenant hires the Premises from Landlord. 1.2 Tenant shall use the Premises as its offices and for providing programs and services consistent with its mission as a family counseling center. 1.3 Tenant may use the Premises for special events (e.g., weddings and other private functions or commercial enterprises); provided, however, that Tenant first requests and obtains Landlord's consent thereto and that the requested other use is consistent with the policy guidelines of Landlord regarding the use of properties/facilities owned and/or operated by Landlord. 1.4 Tenant shall make the Premises available, at no charge, for tours, meetings and other activities of the Etiwanda Historical Society ("Society"), at such times and in accordance with terms and conditions as shall be mutually agreed upon among Landlord, Tenant and Society. 2. AS-IS. Landlord makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the condition of the Premises, and Landlord shall have no obligation to construct any improvements on, make any alterations or repairs to, or remediate and remove any hazardous substances from, the Premises as a condition of Tenant's occupancy of the Premises, whether or not such improvements, alterations, repairs, remediation or removal are required by any applicable law. Tenant expressly acknowledges and agrees that there is no parking on the Land and that it (and its agents, employees and invitees) may, and shall, only park in the adjacent school parking lot at the times set forth in, and subject to the other terms and conditions applicable to Landlord under, Section 3 of that certain Joint Use Agreement dated as of July 25, 2002, executed by Landlord and the Etiwanda School District, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C (the "Joint Use Agreement"). 3. TERM AND COMMENCEMENT DATE. 3.1 The initial term of this Lease shall commence on the date that Tenant takes occupancy of the Premises (the "Commencement Date"), and shall continue for one (1) year thereafter (the "Initial Term"), unless sooner terminated in accordance with this Lease. 3.2 The Initial Term, and any "Extended Term" (as defined below), shall be automatically extended for an additional one (1) year term (an "Extended Term") unless either Landlord or Tenant has given notice to the other, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or the current Extended Term, as applicable, that such party has decided to terminate the Lease upon the expiration of the Initial Term or such Extended Term, as applicable, in which case this Lease shall terminate upon the expiration of the Initial Term or the current Extended Term, as applicable. 4. RENT. 4.1 The base rent for the Premises shall be One Dollar ($1.00) per annum (the "Base Rent") and shall be paid without notice or offset, in advance of the Commencement Date and, if applicable, each Extended Term. In addition to the payment of the Base Rent, Tenant shall pay a monthly consulting fee of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) (the "Consulting Fee") to Society on or before the first day of each month during the Initial Term and each Extended Term. The Base Rent and the Consulting Fee shall be collectively be referred to herein as the "Rent." 4.2 This is a "triple net" lease and, in addition to paying the Rent, Tenant {shall be responsible for paying all costs of maintaining and operating the Premises, including utilities, 'Waxes" and "Operating Costs" (as those terms are defined below). 5. SERVICES AND UTILITIES. 5.1 Tenant shall furnish all utiliti~'s needed by Tenant in connection with its occupancy and use of the Premises, including water, sewer, electricity, heating and air conditioning. 5.2 Tenant shall be responsible for servicing and maintaining all of the Premises' electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems. 5.3 Unless caused by the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of Landlord, Landlord shall not be liable or responsible for any loss, damage or expense sustained or incurred by Tenant as a result of any change, failure, interference, disruption or defect in ~he supply or character of any utility or service furnished to the Premises. 6. TAXES AND OPERATING COSTS. 6. t The term "Taxes" shall mean (a) all real and personal property taxes, assessments (including assessments for public works, improvements or benefits, whether or not begun or completed prior to the Commencement Date, and whether or not completed within prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Extended Term) and other governmental charges or levies of every kind, character and description whatsoever, that are assessed, levied or imposed by any governmental authority upon or with respect to or that may become a lien on the Premises; (b) any taxes that may be assessed, levied or imposed by any governmental authority in addition to, or in lieu of, all or any part of such real or personal property taxes, assessments, charges or levies; and (c) all business, license, use or other taxes that may be assessed, levied or imposed upon the Building. 6.2 The term "Operating Costs" shall mean the aggregate of all costs incurred in the operation and maintenance of the Premises and shall include the repair and maintenance of air conditioning equipment, heating equipment, plumbing equipment, life safety support systems, energy management systems and elevators; wall, floor and window coverings; pest control; water, sewer, gas, electric energy systems; and costs of building alterations, modifications or equipment; and all costs. 7. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS; ALTERATIONS; MAINTENANCE. 7.1 Subject to budgetary appropriations, Landlord agrees to make up to One Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($160,000) from the federal Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program (the "Tenant Improvement Allowance") available to Tenant to fund the renovation/restoration of the Building and certain improvements to the Promises' hardscaping and landscaping (collectively, the "Tenant Improvements"). 7.2 Tenant shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, plans and/or working drawings and/or specifications, to such level of detail as may be reasonably required by Landlord, for the Tenant Improvements (the "Plans and Specifications"). The Plans and Specifications shall be submitted to Landlord for its review and approval prior to the commencement of the Tenant Improvements. Tenant shall not commence, or cause the commencement of, the Tenant Improvements until it receives authorization to ~roceed therewith from Landlord. The Plans and Specifications will be become the property of Landlord (for purposes of record and reference) after the Tenant Improvements have been completed. 7.3 Tenant shall be responsible for the diligent completion of the Tenant Improvements in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Upon completion of the Tenant Improvements and submission of invoices, receipts and other evidence of the costs and expenses incurred by Tenant in connection therewith (including costs and expenses associated with the preparation of the Plans and Specifications) to Landlord, Landlord shall disburse so mt/ch of the Tenant Improvement Allowance to Tenant as Landlord reasonably determines is substantiated thereby. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant acknowledges that the Tenant Improvement Allowance will be provided only if CDBG funds are available, and Tenant assumes full responsibility for the costs of any Tenant Improvements made prior to its receipt of authorization to proceed from Landlord, or for any costs of the Tenant Improvements in excess of the Tenant Improvement Allowance. 7.4 Tenant shall not make any other additions, improvements or alterations to the Premises without the consent of Landlord. Any such additions, improvements or alterations to the Premises shall be made at the sole cost and expense of Tenant (except as provided in Section 7.1.1) and in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations, including laws related to accessibility for persons with disabilities and the obligation to pay prevailing wages pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1771. 7.5 Any mechanic's lien filed against the Premises for work done or materials or equipment furnished to or contracted for by Tenant shall be discharged or bonded by Tenant, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, within fifteen (15) days after the date it is filed. Landlord shall have the right to post notices of nonresponsibility on the Building. 7.6 The Tenant Improvements will be deemed to be the property of Landlord. All articles of personal property and all business and trade fixtures, private telephone systems and lines, furniture and movable partitions owned, leased or installed in the Premises by Tenant at its sole cost and expense, shall be and remain the property of Tenant and may be removed from the Premises by Tenant at any time, unless doing so would damage the Premises or materially diminish its value. Upon the expiration or early termination of this Lease, Tenant shall remove all of its personal property from the Premises. 7.7 Landlord shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain in good condition the following structural parts of the Building: foundation, bearing and exterior walls (excluding windows and doors), roof, gutters and downspouts. 4 / {~3 7.8 Except as provided in Section 7.3.1, Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain the Premises in a good, safe and working condition.. 8. DAMAGE TO TENANT'S PROPERTY. I 8.1 Neither Landlord nor its officers, agents or employees shall be liable to Tenant for any loss of, or damage to, the personal property of Tenant located at the Premises resulting from tim, explosion, steam, gas, electricity, water or moisture in or from any part of the Premises, including its roof, wails, ceilings and floors, or from the pipes, appliances or mechanical and electrical systems in the Premises, oF from any other place or from any other cause, whether or not similar to the foregoing. 8.2 Tenant shall provide prompt verbal notice to Landlord, to be followed by written notice, in the event of any material damage to the Promises or the personai property of Tenant located at the Premises resulting from any fire, accident, casualty or condition in, on or about the Premises. 9. PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES. Tenant shall be liable for, and shall pay, any taxes levied against, or attributable to, any of the personal property of Tenant located at the Premises. ~ 10. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND CASUALTY INSURANCE; MUTUAL WAIVER OF SUBROGATION. 10.1 Tenant shail, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and maintain an insurance policy covering property damage to the Building. 10.2 Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and maintain an insurance policy covering all risks of direct physical loss or damage to the personal property of Tenant located at the Premises, and to all of Tenant's additions, improvements or other alterations to the Premises, to the extent of their full replacement value. 10.3 Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and maintain a policy of commercial general liability insurance consistent with Tenants' practice for similar buildings occupied or owned by Tenant. 10.4 Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and maintain workers' compensation insurance insuring against and satisfying Tenant's obligations and liabilities under the workers' compensation laws of the State of California. 10.5 The insurance policy required to be obtained and maintained by Tenant under Sections 10.1 through 10.3, inclusive, must: (a) name Landlord as an additional insured; (b) be written as primary policy coverage and not contributing with, or in excess of, any coverage that Landlord may carry; (c) provide that the policy may not be canceled unless Landlord shall have received at least thirty (30) days' prior notice of cancellation; and (d) be issued by an insurance company with a Best's Rating of A:XIII or greater. The issuance of any such insurance policy shah not be deemed to limit or restrict in any way Tenant's liability or obligations arising under, or out of, this Lease. 5 10.6 Tenant shall furnish Landlord with a certificate evidencing the insurance policies required to be obtained and maintained by Tenant prior to thelCommencement Date and not later than thirty (30) days prior to expiration of any such policy. 10.7 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease, neither Landlord nr}r Tenant shall be liable to the other or to any insurance company (by way of subrogation or otherwise) insuring the other party for any loss or damage to any building, structure or other tangible property, or any resulting loss of income or additional expense, even though such loss or damage might have been occasioned by the negligence of such party, its agents or employees, if , such loss or damage is covered by insurance benefitiog the party suffering such loss or damage or was required to be covered by insurance pursuant to this Section 10. If required to make the foregoing waiver of subrogation binding upon their respective insurance carriers, Landlord and Tenant shall give notice to their respective insurance carriers that such mutual waiver of subrogation is contained in this Lease. Tenant agrees to cause all other occupants of the Premises claiming by, under or through Tenant to execute and deliver to Landlord such a waiver of claims and to obtain such waiver of subrogation rights endorsements. 11. COMPLIANCE WlTH LAWS AND INSURANCE POLICIES. 11.1 In connection with its occupancy and use of the Premises, Tenant shall~, at its sole cost and expense, promptly comply with all applicable present and future federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations and with all orders and rules of governmental authorities having jurisdiction, including compliance with any law, ordinance or regulation that requires alterations by Landlord or Tenant to the Premises; provided, however, that there shall be no parking on the Land and Tenant shall have the rights and obligations of Landlord under Section 3 of the Joint Use Agreement with respect to off-site parking and further that Tenant shall be solely responsible for making such other arrangements for off-site parking as shall be necessary or desired in connection with Tenant's permitted use of the Premises. 11.2 Tenant shall refrain from restricting the use of the Premises on the basis of sex, age, handicap, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry or national origin of any person. Ail contracts entered into by Tenant in connection therewith shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, age, handicap, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transferee himself or any person claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the land." 11.3 Tenant shall not do, omit to do or permit to be done any act or thing in, on or about the Premises that will invalidate, or be in conflict with, any requirement, covenant or condition of any casualty insurance policy covering the Premises or the personal property therein, or that will subject Landlord to any uninsured liability to any person for personal injury, death or property damage. 12. INDEMNITY. 12.1 Tenant agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and hold Landlord free and harmless from and against (collectively, "Indemnify") any and all claims, causes of action, demands, damages, liens, liabilities, losses, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) to which Landlord may be exposed or that Landlord may incur in connection with (a) an injury to, or death of, any person on the Promises, (b) a loss of, or damage to, any property occurring in, on or about the Premises, or (c) a violation of any law, ordinance or regulation applicable to the Premises or Tenant's occupancy and use thereof (collectively, "Losses"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is the intent of Landlord and Tenant that Tenant shall be liable to Indemnify Landlord under this Section 12.1 irrespective of the cause of the Losses (i.e., regardless of whether or not caused by any act, omission, willful misconduct or negligent conduct (whether active or passive) of Tenant, or otherwise), except to the extent that the Losses are solely caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Landlord, or its agents, employees and invitees. 12.2 This Section 12 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. 13. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS OF TENANT. 13.1 Tenant shall maintain a method of accounting, open to inspection by Landlord, that shall, to the reasonable satisfaction of Landlord, correctly and accurately reflect the gross receipts and disbursements of Tenant. 13.2 Tenant acknowledges that the Tenant Improvement Allowance is funded with public funds from CDBG and Tenant hereby agrees to comply with all regulatory requirements applicable thereto. 14. LANDLORD'S ACCESS TO PREMISES. Landlord and its employees, agents and representatives shall have the right to enter upon the Premises after reasonable notice to Tenant. 15. ASSIGNMENT, SUBLETTING, ETC. Tenant shall not assign, transfer, hypothecate or encumber this Lease, or sublet the Premises, or suffer or permit the Premises to be occupied or used by any other person or entity without the prior consent of Landlord, which consent may be withheld or granted in Landlord's sole and absolute discretion. 16. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. 16.1 The occurrence of any one of the following shall constitute a default by Tenant under this Lease: 16.1.1 Tenant shall fail to pay Rent within five (5) business days after Tenant receives notice thereof from Landlord (provided, however, that the notice requirement contained in this Section 16.1.1 is not in addition to any legal requirement that notice be given and may be satisfied by sending the notice required by any applicable law or statute including California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1161); or 16.1.2 Tenant shall fail to perform or comply with any of the other | covenants or conditions of this Lease, and such failure is not cured within thirty (30) days after Tenant receives notice thereof from Landlord; provided, however, that if the failure to perform or comply cannot reasonably be cured within thirty (30) days, Tenant shall not be in default if Tenant commences to cure the failure to perform or comply within the thirty (30) day period and diligently and in good faith continues to cure the same thereafter. 16.2 If Tenant commits an Event of Default, Landlord shall in addition to any and all other rights and remedies which Landlord may have under this Lease or by law or in equity, the remedies under California Civil Code Section 1951.2 (i.e., terminate this Lease and sue for damages) or the remedy under California Civil Code Section 1951.4 (i.e., keep this Lease in effect and sue for rent as it comes due). 16.3 Except as expressly provided herein, the various rights, options, elections, powers and remedies of Landlord contained in this Section 16 shall not be deemed to be exclusive; they are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies, rights or priorities contained elsewhere in this Lease or now or later allowed by law or in equity. 17. NO WAIVER. 17.1 The failure of Landlord or Tenant to seek redress for violation of, or to insist upon the strict performance of, any covenant or condition of this Lease shall not be deemed a waiver by Landlord or Tenant of its right to such redress for a prior, concurrent or subsequent violation of the same or to subsequently insist upon strict performance of any other covenant or condition of this Lease. The receipt and acceptance by Landlord of rent with knowledge of any preceding breach by Tenant of any covenant, term or condition of this Lease shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach. No provision of this Lease and no default by Landlord or Tenant hereunder shall be deemed to have been waived by the other party unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the waiving party. 17.2 No payment by Tenant or receipt and acceptance by Landlord of a lesser amount than the rent herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than on account of the rent, nor shall any endorsement or statement on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment of the rent be deemed an accord and satisfaction, and Landlord may accept such check or payment without prejudice to Landlord's right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other right or remedy provided herein or at law or in equity. 18. LITIGATION EXPENSES. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is commenced under or in connection with this Lease the losing party shall pay to the prevailing party, and the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award for, the reasonable amount of the attorneys' fees, court costs and other litigation expenses incurred by the prevailing party in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. 19. SUBORDINATION. /¥7 19.1 This Lease is and shall be subordinate to any encumbrance now of record or recorded after the date of this Lease affecting Landlord and the Promises. Such subordination is effective without any further act of Tenant. Tenant shall, from time to time upon request from Landlord, execute and deliver any documents or instruments that may be required by a lender to effectuate any such subordination. If Tenant fails to execute and deliver any such documents or instruments, Tenant irrevocably constitutes and appoints Landlord as Tenant's special attorney- in-fact to execute and deliver any such documents or instruments on its behalf. 19.2 Each party, within ten (10) days after notice from the other party, shall execute and deliver to the other party, in recordable form, a certificate stating that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect, or in full force and effect as modified, and stating the modifications. The certificate also shall state the amount of Rent, the dates to which the Rent has been paid in advance, and the amount of any security deposit or prepaid Rent. Failure to deliver the certificate within the ten (10) days shall be conclusive upon the party failing to deliver the certificate for the benefit of the party requesting the certificate and any successor to the party requesting the certificate, that this Lease is in full force and effect and has not been modified except as may be represented by the party requesting the certificate. 20. DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION. 20.1 Tenant agrees to promptly notify Landlord of any damage to the Premises resulting from fire, earthquake or any other event beyond the control of Tenant (a "Casualty"). If a Casualty unreasonably disrupts Tenant's access to the Premises, or a Casualty results affects the structural elements of the Premises making the Premises unsafe to occupy and use, or a material Casualty occurs in the last ninety (90) days of this Lease, then either Landlord or Tenant may terminate this Lease by notice to the other. In no event shall Landlord be obligated in any manner whatsoever to repair any damage to the Premises caused by a Casualty. 20.2 The provisions of this Section 20 constitute an express agreement between Landlord and Tenant that applies in the event of any Casualty. Tenant and Landlord, therefore, fully waive the provisions of any statute or regulation, including California Civil Code Sections 1932(2) and 1933(4), for any rights or obligations concerning a Casualty. 21. EMINENT DOMAIN. 21.1 If the whole of the Premises shall be taken by eminent domain or disposed of under threat of an impending taking by eminent domain, by, or to, any public authority, this Lease shall cease and terminate one (1) day prior to the date legal title to the Premises shall vest in such authority. 21.2 If only a portion of the Premises is so taken or disposed of, Landlord or Tenant may, at its option, terminate this Lease by giving notice thereof to the other. Landlord and Tenant each hereby waive the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1265.130, which allows either party to a lease to petition the Superior Court to terminate the Lease in the event of a partial taking of the Premises. 21.3 In any of the foregoing cases, Landlord shall be entitled to all compensation and awards arising out of or in connection with such taking or disposition, 9 tl.if including any portion thereof attributable to the value of the leasehold estate, except that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prevent Tenant from recovering from the taking or acquiring authority compensation for the taking of any personal property or fixtures belonging to it or for interruption or damage to its business or for moving or other expenses, to the extent any of tt]e same are compensable by law. 22. NOTICES. Any notice, request, direction, instruction, demand, consent, authorization, waiver, approval or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall not be effective unless it is given in writing and shall be delivered (a) in person, , (b) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (c) by facsimile, or (d) by a commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and addressed to the parties at the addresses stated below, or at such other address as either party may hereafter notify the other in writing as aforementioned: Landlord: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Jack Lam, City Manager Facsimile: (909) 477-2848 Tenant: West End Family Counseling Services 855 North Euclid Avenue Ontario, California 91762 Attention: Jed E. Shafer, Executive Director Facsimile: (909) 481-1519 Service of any such notice or other communications so made shall be deemed effective on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by confirmed answerback if by facsimile (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile is unable to be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non- business day, then such notice or demand so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day immediately following the day of actual delivery. No communications via electronic mail shall be effective to give any notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other communications hereunder. 23. MISCELLANEOUS. 23.1 Words of any gender used herein shall include any other gender, and singular words include the plural, and vice versa, and "person" includes persons, firms and corporations and all other types of entities and organizations, unless in each case the sense othelwise requires. The term "Landlord" shall mean the owner of the Premises at the relevant time. lO 23.2 Tenant shall not be required to provide Landlord with a security deposit. 23.3 Tenant, at any time and from time to time, at the request of Landlord, shall promptly execute, acknowledge and deliver to Landlord a certificate certifying (a) that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, if there have been modifications, that the same is in full force and effect as modified and stating the modifications); and (b) that there are not then existing any offsets or defenses against the enforcement of any provision of this Lease except as therein specified. 23.4 Time is of the essence of the notice requirements and the obligations of the parties under this Lease. 23.5 If there are any covenants yet to be performed by Tenant as of the date of expiration or termination of the term hereof, including, without limitation, the payment of Taxes, Operating Costs and Rent under this Lease as of such date, such covenants shall survive the expiration or termination of the term hereof whether or not they are then known or determined. 23.6 ' This Lease contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and any purported agreement hereafter made shall be ineffective to change, modify, discharge or effect an abandonment of it in whole or in part unless such purported agreement is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is · sought. 23.7 This Lease shall be govemed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of California. 23.8 The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision of this Lease shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. 23.9 The section headings are inserted only as a matter of convenience and reference and in no Way define, limit or describe the scope of any section of this Lease nor the intent of any of its provisions. 23.10 Each party represents to the other that it has not engaged or used the services of any broker, finder or salesperson in connection with this Lease. 23.11 This Lease may be executed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. 24. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. 24.1 The term "Hazardous Substance" shall mean any pollutant, contaminant, toxic or hazardous waste, dangerous substance, potentially dangerous substance, noxious substance, toxic substance, flammable, explosive, radioactive material, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, asbestos, PCB's, or any other substances the removal of which is required, or the manufacture, production, generation, use, maintenance, disposal, treatment, storage, transfer, handling or ownership of which is restricted, prohibited, regulated or penalized by any federal, state, county, or municipal statutes or laws now or at any time hereafter in effect, including but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (U.S.C. Sections 9601, et seq.), the Hazardous Materials Transportatign Act (49 U.S.C. Sections 1801, et seq.), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Sections 1251, et seq.), the Ctew Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sections 7401, et seq.), the Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. Sections 2601, et seq.), and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. Sections 651, et seq.), as these laws have been amended or supplemented. 24.2 Tenant shall not use, or permit others to use, the Premises for the . production, generation, manufacture, treatment, transportation, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Substance, whether or not in compliance with any and all applicable federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Provided however, Tenant, without Landlord's prior consent, shall be allowed (in strict compliance with all laws), to utilize ordinary quantities of Hazardous Substances customarily used in general office use and in compliance with the use of the Premises allowed herein (i.e., cleaning supplies, copier toner and similar items). Tenant shall immediately notify Landlord of (a) any release or discharge by Tenant or any other occupant of the Premises (or alleged release or discharge) of a Hazardous Substance, or (b) of any notice of violation or alleged violation of any law regarding any Hazardous Substance received by Tenant or any other occupant of the Premises. 24.3 Without limiting Tenant's other obligations and liabilities hereunder, Tenant shall indemnify, defend and hold Landlord its officers, tenants and employees harmless, from and against any and all claims, damages, expenses, penalties, liabilities and costs, resulting or arising from a breach of the covenant contained in Section 24.2. 24.4 The provisions of this Section 24 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. [This Space Intentionally Left Blank; Signatures Begin On The Next Page] 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Landlord has caused this Lease to be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer, and Tenant has caused this Lease to be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer of Tenant, as of the day and year first written above. LANDLORD: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation By: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON, a professional corporation By: James L. Markman, City Attorney ATTEST: By: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk TENANT: WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation By: Name: Its: J 5'2. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND THE NORTHWESTERN-MOST .25 ACRE OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 12, BLOCK "K", ACCORDING TO PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAVING AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 305 FEET THEREOF. EXHIBIT B DEPICTION OF LAND (See Attached) EXHIBIT C JOINT USE AGREEMENT (See Attached) /5'5' R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D EPART~IE N T Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FOR RUSSELL L. AND JODI KAY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9232 COTTONWOOD WAY (APN # 1062-111-08) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement submitted by Russell L~ and Jodi Kay. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per City Ordinance 58, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was required for the future installation of missing street improvements, as a general requirement for issuance of a building permit, fronting the property at 9232 Cottonwood Way. City Council approved the Real Property and Lien Agreement per Resolution 84-247 and said agreement was recorded on October 4, 1984, as Document No. 84-23883. Access to the property is provided from Hellman Avenue and a 30-foot offer of dedication was required by the County for Cottonwood Way, prior to the City's incorporation. Cottonwood Way has not been officially deemed a private street by City Council action. The new property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Russell L. Kay are currently attempting to secure refinancing for the property. Their lender requires that the City's lien be subordinated in favor of the new loan and lender. R~ively submitted, ~ William J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:VC:dlw Attachments ~o~ title; ~[L---Z~=~~' VICINITY MAP I~ ~n .~, page RESOLUTION NO. g)~'"///~ A RESOLU~'~ON OF T.E C~TY COUNC. OF ~E CITY OF RANC.O CUCAMONGA, A~OVlNG A SU~O~A~O~ AGREEMENT FROM RUSSELL L. AND JODI ~Y AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off-site improvements, including curb, gutter and pavement, was approved by City Council September 19, 1984, and recorded in San Bernardino County October 4, 1984, Instrument No. 84-238883; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien agreement lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordination Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,770.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, MOBASSALY ENGINEERING, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,077.00 FOR THE GROVE AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1263176-0 RECOMMENBATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $250,770.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $25,077.00, for the Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1263176-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 16, 2004, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $337,458.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The construction of this project is to overlay the existing asphalt concrete pavement on Grove Avenue from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard where high volume traffic has deteriorated the existing pavement. Also, the east side of Grove Avenue will be widened CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: ACCEPT BIDS AND AWARD GROVE AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT April 7, 2004 Page 2 from Arrow Route to Tapia Via and will include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, and between Tapia Via and Rancheria Drive will have existing concrete curb removed and replaced with new concrete curb and gutter with sidewalk adjacent. The contract documents calk for thirty-five (35) working days to complete this construction project. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 16, 2004 APPARENTLOWBIDDER Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation ENGINEERS COST Mobassaly Engineering, Laird Construction Co. From Ar__row Route to Foothill Boulevard ESTIMATE Inc. Inc. R.J. Noble Company UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTEB NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT I. 1 LS C~earing and Grubbing $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 $20,220.00 $20,220.0G $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 2. 11530 SF Remove AC Pavement, ind. ACberm, saw cutting and $0.60 $6,918.0C $1.45 $16,718.50 $1.00 $11,530.00 $1.10 $12,683.001 $12,683.00 3. 540 LF Remove PCC Curb $1.00 $540.00 $1.00 $540.00 $5.00 $2,?00.00 $1.43: $??2.20 $7?2.20 4. 210 SF Remove PCC Oross Gutter and Spandrel $2.00 $420.00 $1.00! $210.00 $2.50 $525.00 $3.85 $808.50' $808.50 5. l EA qemove Palm Tree $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00i $500.00 $575.00 $575.00 $575.00 6. I EA Remove Existing Tree $800.00 $800.00 $400.001 $400.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $950.00 $950.00 $950.00 7. I LS :~emoveandRelocateFence $2,000.00; $2,000.00 $900.001 $900.00 $2,500.00i $2,500.00 $1,300.00i $1,3oo.oo! $1,300.00 8. 8 EA telocate Mailbox $80.00' $640.00 $100.00! $800.00 $100.00 '$800.00 $175.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 9. 140 TONS Cmshed Aggregate Base $28.001 $3,920.00 $29.00. $4,060.0(2 $25.001 $3,500.00 $27.00i $3,780.00 $3,780.00 10. 170 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $65.00' $11,050.00 $76.00[ $12,920.06 $75.00 $12,750.00 $48.001 $8,160.00! $8,160.00 11. 414( SY Co d P ane (Varies 0' to 0.12') $2.00! $8,280.00 $1.70 $7,038.00 $2.001 $8,280.00 $1.87 $7,741.80 $7,741.80 12. 5 EA AdjustManholeFrarne&Covertofinishgrade $500.00i $2,500.00 $225.00 $1,125.00 $?25.00 $3,625.00 $465.00i $2,325.00 $2,325.00 13. 20 EA AdjustWaterValveSox&Covertofinishgrade $250.00 $5,000.00 $30.00[ $600.00 $50.001 $1,000.00 $210.00' $4,200.001 $4,200.00 14. 400 TON! Overla¥ 0.12' to 0.15' Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) ir$70.001 $28,000.00 $61.00' $24,400.00 $52.501 $21,000.00 $53.00' '$21,200.00 $21,200.00 15. 1230 TONS Oveday0'15'AsphaltRubberHotMix(ARHMlincl, weedkill,, $70.00 $86,100.00 $61.00i $75,030.00 $52.501 $64,575.00 $53.00 $65,190.00i $65,190.06 16. 1 EA Constmct10' Catch Basin lnlet, ind. Local depression and 21' $10,000.00i $I0,000.0£ $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,500.00! $4,500.06 $7,450.001 $7,450.001 $7,450.06 17. 1 EA Construct undersidewalk drain, incl. curbing asshownir $7,000.00. $7,000.012 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.06 $5,950.001 $5,950.00 $5,950.06 18. 1043 LF ~"PCCCurb&24"Gutter $16.001 $16,688.012 $11.50 $11,994.50 $15.00[ $15,645.06 $17.55 $18,304.65' $18,304.65 19. 260 SF 3 PCCDr'vewayApproach $8.00' $2,080.00 $3.30, $858.00 $6.75' $1,755.00 $6.85 $1,781.00 $1,781.00 20. 31C SF YPCCDrivewayApproach $10.001 $3,100.00 $3-601 $1,116.00 $7.50, $2,325.00 $6.75 $2,092.50 $2,092.50 21. 7190 SF 2enstructPCCSidewalk, incl. sidewalk behind dfive apl $4.001 $28,760.00 $2.60 $18,694.00 $2.751 $19,772.50 $2.85 $20,491.501 $20,491.50 22. 132 SF Construct PCC Wheel Chair Ramp, incl. Removal of exi~ $6.001 $792.00 $4.25 $561.00 $18.50 $2,442.00 $11.40 $1,504 801 $1,504.80 23. 158: SF PCC Cross Gutter & Spandrels, incl. crushed aggregate $8.00i $12,680.00 $4.001 $6,340.00 $7.501 $11,887.50 ' $6.70 $10,619.501 $10,619.50 24. 290 LF Construct retaining cart) (varies 0' to l'+) $12.00 $3,480.00 $10.50~ $3,045.00 $18.50' $5,365.00 $12.751 $3,696.501 $3,697.50 25. 8 EA AdjustWaterMeterBoxtoGrade $150.001 $1,200.00 $50.00 $400.06 $50.001 $400.00 $70.00~ $560.00 $560.00 26. 1 EA Construct manhole curb cover $1,000.00i $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.0C $2,100.00' $2,100.00 $3,125.001 $3,125.00 $3,125.00 27. 350 LF Constructchainlinkfer~ceandtopofretainingwalloron $25.001 $8,750.00 $16.00 $5,600.06 $31.50 $11,025.00 $40.25 $14,087.501 $14,087.50 28. 1240 LF Trenching. installconduit, pullboxes, pull ropes and bac $14.00i $17,360.00 $18.50 $22,940.00 $15.00r $18,600.00 $22.30 $27,652.O01 $27,652.00 29. 1 LS Restore Landscape and lrrigation S¥stem $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00i $1,500.00 $5,000.00i $5,000.00 $1,725.00 $1,725.00! $1,725.00 30. 31 EA Replace lnductive Loop Detectors $3oo.ooI $9,300.00 $180.00' $5,580.00 $200.00] $6,200.00 $191.00. $5,921.001 $5,921.00 3 I. 1 LS l,raffic Striping and Signs, incl. Removalof exist. $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $5,800.001 $5,800.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,850.00 $5,850 00i $5,850.00 32. LS l.rafficControl $20,000.001 $20,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,00000 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 33. 2 EA 3onstruction Notification Sign $800.001 $1,600.012 $600.001 $l,200.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $750.00; $1,500.00 $1,500.00 LS WPP $5,000.00 $5,000.012 $2,0O0.00, $2,000.00 $1,250.001 $1,250.00 $3,750.001 $3,750.00 $3,750.0 i I $291,146.45 % Page 1 TOTAl ~ $337,458.06 ~ $250,770.00 [ $277,772.06 $291,147.4~ BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 16, 2004 Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation From Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Gentry Brothers, Inc. All American Asphalt Sequel Contractors, Inc. Sully-Miller Contracting -- Company UNIT BID CORRECTE[ UNIT UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT' AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Clearing and Grubbing $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $7,500.00' $7,500.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $25,500.00, $25,500.00 2. 11530 SF Remove AC Pavement, inch AC berm, saw cutting and $2.00 $23,060.001 $23,060.00 $1.00 $11,530.00 $1.20 $13,836.06 $1.25 $14,412.50 3. 540 LF Remove PCC Curb $3.00 $1,620.00 $1,620.00 $1.50 $810.00 $2.00 $1,080.00 $3.50: $1,890.00 4. 210 SF Remove PCC Cross Gutter and Spandrel $4.00 $840.001 $840.00 $ 1.16:1 $243.60 $2.00 $420.00 $3.50 $735.00 5. I EA ~emove Palm Tree $700.00 $700.00 $700.00 $570.00 $570.00 $900.00: $900.00 $600.O0 $600.00 6. EA ~emove Existing Tree $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.0C $920.00[ $920.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00' $1,000.00 7. l LS %move and Relocate Fence $5,500.00i $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $1,250.001 $1,250.00 $2,000.00; $2,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 8. 8 EA Relocate Mailbox $175.00 $1,400.00J $1,400.00 $37S.00, $3,000.00 $100.00[ $800.00 $150.001 $1,200.00 9. 140 TONS CoJshed Aggregate Base $14.00i $1,960.00~ $l,960.00 $42.50 $5,950.00 $40.00' $5,600.00 $67.501 $9,450.00 10 170 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $40.001 $6,800.00' $6,800.00 $56.00 $9,520.00 $60.00 $10,200.00 $70.00 $11,900.00 11. 4141 SY Cold P ane (Varies 0' to 0.12') $1.30[ $5,382.00 $5,382.00 $1.85~ $7,659.0(3 $1.50j $6,210.00 $2.001 $8,280.00 12. 5 EA AdjustManholeFrame&Covertofinishgrade $200.00 $1,000.001 $I,O00.00 $310.001 $1,550.00 $500.00! $2,500.00 $300.00, $1,500.0C 13. 20 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to finish grade $20.00 $400.00[ $400.00 $52.00' $1,040.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 14. 400 TON.' Oveda¥0,12'to0.15'AsphaltRubberHotMix(ARHM), $57.00! $22,800.00' $22,800.00 $54.401 $21,760.00 $58.00. $23,200.00 $59.00 $23,600.00 15. 1230 TONS Oveday0.1S'Aspha~tRubberHotMix(ARHM) incL weed kill, $57.00: $70, IO0.00] $70,110.00 $54.401 $66,912.00 $58.001 $71,340.00 $59.00i $72,570.00 16. 1 EA Construct t0' Catch Basin lnlet, incI. Local depression and 21' $13,000.00i $13,000.00! $13,000.00 $9,300.001 $9,300.00 $11,ooo.oo[ $11,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 17. I EA Construct undersidewalk drain, incl. curbingas shownil $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,000.00~ $3,000.00 $5,200.00 $5,200.00 18. 1043 LF 8' PCC Curb & 24" Gutter $13.00i $13,559.00i $13,559.00 $25.00i $26,0?5.00 $18.00 $18,774.00 $16.00! $16,688.00 19. 260 SF 5"PCCDdvewayApproach $3.50' $910.00 $910.00 $5.141 $1,336.40 $3.00 $780.00 $6.00i $1,560.00 20. 310 SF ]"PCCDrivewayApproach $3.75 $1,162.50 $1,162.50 $6.50' $2,015.00 $4.00 $I,240.00 $7.50[ $2,325.01) 21. 719C SF .7.onstructPCCSidewalk, incl sidewalk behind drive ap; $3.001 $21,570.00i $21,570.00 $3.05'~ $21,929.50 $4.00 $28,760.0C $2.75] $19,772.50 22. 132 SF 2onstruct PCC Wheel Chair Ramp, incl. Removal of exi $7.00 $924.00 $924.0C $5. I01 $673.20 $4.001 $528.0(3 $6.50' $858.00 23. 1585 SF PCCCrossGutter&Spandrels~incl. crushed aggregate $8.00[ $12,680.00[ $12,680.0(3 $9.40:$14,899.00 $5.001 $7,925.0(] $6.50 $10,302.50 24 290 LF Construct retaining curb (vades 0' to l'+) $16.00 $4,640.00 $4,640.00 $39.00[ $11,310.00 $11.00 $3,190.00 $30.001 $8,?00.00 25. 8 EA Adjust Water Meter Boxto Grade $30.00[ $240.00 $240.00 $295.00! $2,360.00 $100.00 $800.00 $110.00'~ $880.0( 26. 1 EA Constructmanholecurbcover $l,300.00 $l,300.00[ $1,300.00 $550.00 $550.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3 500.00: $3,500.00 2?. 350 LF Constructchainlinkfeneeandtopofretainingwallorol $30.00i $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $39.00' $13,650.00 $20.00 $7,000.00 $34.00 $11,900.00 28. 1240 LF Trenching. lnstallconduit, pullboxes, pullropesandba $l?.001 $21,080.001 $21,080.00 $21.70 $26,908.0(2 $22.00 $2?,280.00 $22.50 $2?,900.00 29. 1 LS Restore Landscape and lrrigation System $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,750.00, $3,?50.0(2 $3,000.00~ $3,000.00 $4,200.00! $4,200.00 30. 31 EA Replace lnductive Loop Detectors $210.001 $6,510.00; $6,510.00 $185.00] $5,735.0(3 $200.00; $6,200.00 $215.001 $6,665.00 31. 1 LS Traffic Striping and Signs, incl. Removal of exist. $7,000.00~ $7,000.00! $7,000.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.0(3 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $6,500.00! $6,500.00 32. I LS Traffic Control $4,000.00! $4,O00.00i $4,000.00 $3,250.001 $3,250.0(3 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $20,000.00. $20,000.00 33. 2 EA Sonstruction Notification Sign $500.00[ $1,000.001 St,000.O0 $850.00[ $1,700.00 $500.00i $1,000.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 34. 11 LS BWPP $1,000.00 $500.00i $1,000.00 $8,200.00i $8,200.00 $1,500.00[ $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00- ~'~..,~ Page 2 TOTA~L ' $299,137.50 ~ $299,647.50 i $303,355.70 [ $305,463.00 i $334,288.50~ BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING ]MARCH 16, 2004 Grove Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Sivia Construction, Inc. Vance Corporation From Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard UNiT UNIT ,NO _Q~.Y UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS Clearing and Grubbing $39,500.00 $39,500.00 $66,000.00j $66,000.00 2. 1153 SF Remove AC Pavement, incI. ACberm, sawcuttingandre~ $4.72 $54,421.60 $1.10 $12,683.00 3. 546 LF Remove PCC Curb $16.70 $9,018.00 $9.00 $4,860.00 4. 210 SF Remove ,=CC Cross Gutter and Spandrel $3.40 $714.00 $12.001 $2,520.00 5. EA ~emove Palm Tree $578.00 $578.00 $600.00 $600.00 6. EA Remove Existing Tree $945.00 $945.00 $1,000.00, $1,000.00 7 LS Remove and Relocate Fence $1,300.00: $1,300.00 $7,400.00! $7,400.00 8. 8 EA Relocate Mailbox $220.00i $1,760.00 $110.00, $880.00 9. 140 TONS CrushedAggregateBase $44.00' $6,160.00 $68.00 $9,520.00 10. 170 TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement $44.30. $7,531.00 $73.00 $12,410.00 11. 414( SY Cold Plane (Varies 0' to 0.12') $1.84! $7,617.6C $1.50 $6,210.00 12. 5 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to finish grade $378.00 $1,890.00 $450.001 $2,250.00: 13. 20 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to finish grade $25.001 $500.00 $18.00 $360.00 14. 400 TONS Overlay 0.12'to 0.15' Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) incl $61.00 $24,400.00 $68.001 $27,200.00 15. 1230 TONS Oveda¥0.15'AsphaltRubberHotMix(ARHMjincl. weedkill, cra, $61.30 $75,399.00 $61.00! $75,030.00 16. EA Construct 10' Catch Basin Inlet. incl Local depression and 21"-'- $6,300.001 $6,300.00 $10,400.00 $10,400.00 17. l i EA Construct undersidewalk drain, ind. curbing as shown in t $2,050.00, $2,050.00 $3,400 00 $3,400.00 18. 1043 LF B" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter $16.30i $17,000.90 $18.001 $18,774.00 19. 260 SI:: ;' PCC Briveway Approach $4.25 $1,105.00 $12.00~ $3,120.00 20.; 310 SF ~" PCC DdYeway Approach $5.501 $1,705.00 $13.00i $4,030.00 21. 7190 SF Construct POC Sidewalk, inci. sidewalk behind drive appn $2.65! $19,053.50 $3.501 $25,165.00 22. 132 SF Construct PCC Wheel Chair Ramp, inch Removal of exisb $15.00 $1,980.00 $18.00' $2,376.00 23. 1585 SF PCCCrossGutter&Spandreis, incl. crushed aggregate b $5.25i $8,321.25 $7.801 $12,363.00 24. 290 LF Construct retaining curb(varies 0'to 1'+) $8.20 $2,378.00 $13.001 $3,770.00 25. 8 EA Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade $150.00 $1,200.00 $280.00 $2,240.00 26. 1 EA Construct manhole curb cover $3,360.00! $3,360.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 27. 350 LF Construct chain link fence and top of retaining wall or on g $33.601 $11,760.00 $15.50 $5,425.00 28. 1240 LF Trenching. Installconduit, pull boxes, putl ropes and backf$22.001 $27,280.0C $24.00 $29,760.00 29. I LS Restore Landscape and Irrigation System $5,300.00 $5,300.00 $3,200.00[ $3,200.00 30. 31 EA Replace Inductive Loop Detectors $183.751 $5,696.25 $193.00 $5,983.00, 31. I LS rraftic Striping and Signs, incl. Removal of exist. $5,750.00' $5,750.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 32. LS Traffic Control $22,265.00 $22,265.00 $29,000.00 $29,000.00 33 2 EA 3onstructlon No ifica ion Sign $1,125.00 $2,250.00 $1,000.00 ~ $2,000.00 34 Ls swPP $3,485.00J$3,485.00 $900.00J $900.00 Page 3 TOT.&I [$379,974. I0 i $398,629.00 VICINITY MAP GROVE AVE. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ARROW RTE. TO FOOTHILL BLVD. PROJECT LOCATION Base Li tse Line Rd Foothill BI Foothill BI Arrow Rt Rt 8th St 10 Freeway ~ 6th St c c ~- ~ c -~ 10 Freeway EXHIBIT R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN~F Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE FUNDING TO COMPLETE THE REMAINING ITEMS OF REPAIR, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PERIPHERAL WORK RELATING TO THE ROUTE 210 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute an agreement between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the establishment of responsibilities for the funding to complete the remaining items of repair, design and construction of peripheral work relating to the Route 210 construction BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: During construction of the Route 210 Freeway, certain additional improvements, peripheral to the freeway, were agreed upon by SANBAG and the City for the benefit and safety of the residents of the City and others transversing the freeway. Other items, mainly landscaped areas along City streets that were damaged by the freeway construction, were left for the City to construct using funds from SANBAG since the City was more adept in the design and construction of the work involved. This agreement delineates the items of work and the percentage of funding agreed upon by SANBAG and the City. The items of work are: 1. Construct a 6-foot high block garden wall on the north side of the freeway, from Beryl Street to Hellman Avenue, and from Amethyst Street to approximately 200 feet east of Hermosa Avenue. This will replace the Caltrans chain link fence on the freeway right-of- way line and shield the residents' visual view of the freeway. The wall will be the dividing line between Caltrans right-of-way and the proposed City park to the north between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue. SANBAG and the City have agreed to split the cost of this wall, estimated to cost $200,000. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 7, 2004 Page 2 2. Overlay Highland Avenue, from 19~ Street to Fairmont Way. SANBAG has agreed to pay the full cost ($40,000) of this A.C. overlay. 3. Screening fencing at Beryl Park. Since the freeway was constructed, soccer balls have been kicked over the retaining/sound wall onto the freeway. In addition, there have been tennis balls being hit onto the freeway. The screen would be of the "netting" type used adjacent to golf courses. SANBAG and the City have agreed to split the cost for this screening, estimated to cost $100,000. 4. Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue. During construction of the freeway, the median island and landscaping in Haven was removed and never replaced by the freeway contractor. On Rochester Avenue, north of the freeway, a large slope due to the deep cut to enable Rochester Avenue to go under the freeway, left a large slope to be landscaped. Also, on the east side of Rochester Avenue, south of the freeway, freeway construction disturbed some landscaping. It was agreed between SANBAG and the City that the City could more efficiently design and construct this landscaping since the City is more adept than SANBAG in this area of work. The total estimated cost of landscaping Haven and Rochester Avenues is $180,178, of which SANBAG has agreed to fund $143,678 and the City has agreed to fund $36,500, which is for additional rockscape on the large steep slope on the west side of Rochester Avenue north of the freeway. This rockscape will enable the City's maintenance crews to more safely maintain the slope. 5. SANBAG has agreed to fund the full cost ($24,800) for repairs due to damage of existing landscaping and irrigation systems at various locations adjacent to the freeway. 6. SANBAG has agreed to fund the full cost ($3,000) for signage and striping for the bike path along Sapphire and 19th Street, connecting to the Regional Cucamonga Channel Trail. The total cost to bring to closure, items relating to the completion of Route 2!0 Freeway, is estimated to be $547,978, of which $361,478 is SANBAG's share and $186,500 is the City's share. The City has available funds for its share of these improvements. The City will be the lead agency in the design and construction of the above items. SANBAG has also agendized this agreement to go before their Board on April 7, 2004. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:MO:Is R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PA R TitlE N T Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Enginee~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $193,049.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, STEINY AND COMPANY, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,304.90 FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1415124-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $92,500 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1415124-0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $193,049.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Steiny and Company, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,304.90, for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School, to be funded from Transportation funds, Account No. 11243035650/1415124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $92,500 to Account No. 11243035650/1415124-0 from Transportation fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 30, 2004, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $139,000. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The bid amount exceeds the Engineer's estimate by $54,049.00. This difference is attributed to the recent doubling in the price of steel. This affects the price of anchor bolts, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: ACCEPT BID - TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL April 7, 2004 Page 2 conduit, poles and other steel materials. Our research indicates the construction market is very busy at present and other agencies report few bids and higher prices. The construction of this project is to install traffic signal equipment and controls, traffic signal interconnect facilities, and pertinent signing and striping modifications. The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction. The traffic signal will be located on Milliken Avenue, north of Banyan Street at the main entrance to Los Osos High School. Respectfully submitted,, City Engineer WJO:JTH:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 30, 2004 Apparent Low Bidder TRAFFIC SIGNALS & SAFETY LIGHTING AT ENGINEERS COST Steiny and Company, LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL ESTIMATE Inc. No other bids received Contractor UNIT UNIT ~ UNIT I UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST : AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Traffic Signals & Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School $139,000.00 $139,000.0~3 $193,049.00 $193,049.00 TOTAL $139,000.00 ~ $193,049.0C BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 30, 2004 TRAFFIC SIGNALS & SAFETY LIGHTING AT LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO ~)TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Traffic Signals & Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School ~ TOTAL ~ Page 1 VICINITY MAP J I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRe DATE: April 7, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 15724, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, SUBMITTED BY K B HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 15724 were approved by the City Council on March 5, 2003. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. KB Home requests an extension in order to complete the pedestrian signal at the trail connection on Mountain View Drive. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments March 8, 2004 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 15724 Dear Mr. James: KB Home requests an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 15724. The request is necessary in order to complete the pedestrian signal at the trail connection on Mountain View Drive. This delay was caused by plan check issues on the signal plans and the long-lead time frames for the delivery of the equipment and poles. Thank you for 'your consideration in this matter.If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 802-1133. Sincerely yours KB HOME Greater Los Angeles Inc. Project Manager KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INO. i 801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 201 I POMONA, CA 91768 TEL 909 802 1277 TOLL FREE 800 828 03t4 . FAX 909 802 t128 I KBHOME,COM -- / 72. CITY OF rrm~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~.~,? ~/C/M/_YY'?'./W~__~ ENG~.~JI~IG DIVISION RESOL ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15724. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 7, 2004, by K B Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 15724; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R ^ i~ H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Sna Re DATE: April 7, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Taflton, Public Services Tech I SUBJF. L~': APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 16264, .LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16264 were approved by the City Council on May 15, 2002. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. is requesting improvement of another 12- month extension on said improvement agreement. KB Home requests an extension in order to complete the pedestrian signal at the trail on Mountain View Drive. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Resp/~ully submitted, City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments 175 March 8, 2004 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 16264 Dear Mr. James: KB Home requests an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 16264. The request is necessary in order to complete the pedestrian signal at the trail connection on Mountain View Drive. This delay was caused by plan check issues on the signal plans, the long-lead time frames for the delivery of the equipment and poles and SCE delay of providing power to the equipment. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 802-1133. Sincerely yours KB HOME Greater Los Angeles Inc. Project Manager HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC, , 801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 201 J POMONA~ CA 91768 TEL 909802 1277]TOLL FREE 8008280314 FAX 909802 1128,KBHOME.COM /7~ VICINITY MAP' BASELINIg ROil) T CITY OF ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ /77 RESOLUTION NO. ~/~"//~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16264 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 7, 2004, by K B Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16264; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A [7 ~'~ G I ~ I' 12, 14 I h G D L PAi~ ~pi',I L ~ I SlaffReport DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech 1 SUBJEC'Ir: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A CASH SURETY FOR MAINTENANCE AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00187, SUBMITTED BY 9101 CENTER AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN 6TH AND 7TM STREETS AT 9118 CENTER AVENUE. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2002-00187 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a cash surety for maintenance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2002-00187, located on the west side of Center Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets at 9118 Center Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept a cash surety for maintenance. Developer: 9101 Center Avenue Associates, LLC. Release: Faithful Pe~ormance Bond No. 104126909 $46,000.00 Accept: Cash Surety Receipt No. 16503 $ 4,600.00 Respec~ully submitted, Willjar~ J. O'Nei} Cityl~ngineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments ARROW ROUTE N 6~ STREET < 5TH S~EET - 4~ STREET City of Item: Staff Report Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity MAp ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: DRC2002-00187 RESOLUTION NO. ~)~'//"//~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00187 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2002-00187 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 17/ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A l~,u. lN [~14~ ~- D~P,~"[~N'I'~ StaffRe rt DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00497, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF 6TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2001-00497 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required improvements for DRC2001-00497 were completed over a year ago. The developer did not request release of bonds at completion of his improvements. Therefore, the Faithful Performance Bond served as his Maintenance Bond. The street improvements have been recently inspected and remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. It is appropriate to release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion. Developer: Oltmans Construction Company Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 83S103741020BCM $94,700.00 Labor & Material Bond No. 83S103741020BCM $47,350.00 Re,~pec.~ully submitted, Will(am/J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTION NO. ~)~"~/'"//~'~ ~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00497 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00497 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I~ A N C H 0 C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DA'BE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00718, LOCATED AT 9471 BUFFALO AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2001-00718 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2001-00718, located at 9471 Buffalo Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 104053997 $366,500.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond No. 104053997-A $ 36,650.00 Respectfully submitted, Willi/~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments 6TH ST,. 90'TI8'~ City of Rancho Cucamonqa RESOLUTION NO. ~)d'/~l~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00718 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00718 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N CiNEERi!NG DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I ~: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR INTERIOR TRACT IIvlPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY FIELDSTONE COMMUNITIES, INCORPORATED. RECOMMENDATION: The required interior tract improvements for Tract 15814 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15814, located on the southwest comer of Highland and Rochester Avenues, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The interior tract improvements have been completed and maintained and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds. Due to the lapse in time, no Maintenance Bonds are required. Developer: Fieldstone Communities, Incorporated Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM91738400 $158,400.00 No. 3SM91739400 $836,000.00 No. 3SM91739500 $868,000.00 The Faithful Performance Bond for the tract perimeter improvements of Lark Drive, Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue will be retained pending resolution of the sound wall issue. The Faithful Performance Bond number is 3SM91739600 in the amount of $1,240,000.00. Respectfully submitted, W eil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments FUTURE ROUTE 50 ~ LARK DRi PROJECT SITE z ,.~ ..-I ~^SE~.iN~ RO^~ ., FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIN~.m%I2CG DIVISION F.~wrRIT.. RE O UTION O. ! 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE INTERIOR TRACT PUBLIC hMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of interior tract public improvements for Tract 15814 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Beruardino County. I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E ~,'G I N E E R IN G D E PA R T~ E N T Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate EngineerO~'. Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec~ SUI3JECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 3419189 IN THE AMOUNT OF $313,174.00, FOR THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 02-050 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 3419189 in the amount of $313,174.00 for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, Contract No. 02-050. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Silvia Construction, Inc. 9007 Center Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5311 Respectfully submitted, William/'& O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FROM GROVI~ AYENUE TO B.~I~.R STREET) BNSF 6TH ST CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ VICINITY MAP Z R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTi~IENT St ffReport DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ,~ff n BY: Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec/~nicia ,4~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. B34219872 IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,810.50, FOR THE COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING AND PCC CURB ALONG SUMMIT. TRAIL AT SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND ALONG HILLSIDE TRAIL, NORTH AND SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD WEST OF BERYL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 02-058 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. B34219872 in the amount of $31,810.50 for the Community Trail Fencing and PCC Curb Along Summit Trail at South of Summit Avenue East of Etiwanda Avenue, and Along Hillside Trail, North and South of Hillside Road West of Beryl Street, Contract No. 02-058. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the community trail improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: California Fence & Supply 17423 South Figueroa Street Gardena, CA 92008 Respectfully submitted, WilliajTFJ. o Nell City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is Attachments HILLSIDE& SUMMIT COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCING North & Soultt Side of Hillside Road West of BerYl Street South Side of Summit Av~.nua East ~ Etlwanda Avenue ,SITE :MAP ) PROJECT ~ · . Iside Ave Wilson Ave Not To Banyan Street Summit .-~ Ave : Rt 210 -J Highland ~,venue 19th Street .= = c= =~ ,~ > = B~e Mne Road m. pra~er R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G IN E E R i~! G D E PA R T~l E N T Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~'~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Teol~nician'¢~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. UC909600020 IN THE AMOUNT OF $191,750.93, FOR THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, SOUTHWEST CORNER, LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 02-066 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. UC90960020 in the amount of $191,750.93 for the Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Southwest Corner, Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02- 068. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the landscape improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Mega Lighting, Inc. 919-1/2 N. Azusa Avenue Covina, CA 91722 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil Oity Engineer WJO:JD/RO:Is Attachments E,N.SF ER. 4TM 5T PROJECT ONTARIO CITY LIMIT LOCATION ,.,~rs.. ARC1TI~I.AI.. AVENUI!I FROM 19TH ST. TO 100' ~1/0 I~NONII'I'~, ~ lo'rI:I S~l'. CITY OF RANCHO cucAMONGA ~i~ (w. vr s~) ~, l~m sr. (sotrm s~) VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERI,NG DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~"~ ~- !=.~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $74,189.36 RECOMMENDATION: D~- I"~ It is recommended that the City Council accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03~;)S'ff', as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $75,865.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $7,418.94, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $74,189.36. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue scope of work consisted of cold planing, removal and replacement of heavy alligatored pavement, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project April 7, 2004 Page 2 asphalt rubber overlay, adjusting manholes and water valve.s, re-striping and pavement markings. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Budgeted Amount: $230,000.00 > Account Numbers: '1 '1763035650/'1376'176-0 > Engineer's Estimate: $82,540.00 > City Council's Approval to Advertise: October '1,2003 > Publish dates for local paper: October 7 & '14, 2003 > Bid Opening: October 2'1,2003 > Contract Award Date: November 19, 2003 > Low Bidder: Silvia Construction, Inc. > Contract Amount: $75,865.00 > J0% Contingency: $7,586.50 ;~ Final Contract Amount: $74,189.36 > Difference in Contract Amount: -$1,675.64 (2.21%) (savings) During the pre-construction meeting, the contractor and staff negotiated at the contractor's request to eliminate the crushed aggregate base by substituting with additional asphalt concrete. Although the substitution increased the quantities of asphalt concrete and asphalt rubber hot mix, the deletion of all crushed aggregate base resulted in the net reduction of $1,675.64 to the contract. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE) CITY OF RANCHO cUCAMONGA ~~ VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABIL~ITATION FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 03-031 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03-031, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. TH CITY OF i~AN CH 0 CU CAM 0 N GA DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - JAMES A. MARTIN, JR. - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal filed in opposition to the project, thus upholding the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: On August 1,2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 661 changing the zoning of the property from residential to Village Commercial. The change was made based upon the construction of the 210 Freeway causing a realignment of Highland Avenue through the property and leaving this remnant piece. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed project on January 5, 2004, at a nearby school (11 residents attended). Residents had questions about glare, traffic, the use of landscaping for screening purposes on the south side of Highland, the proposed hours of operation, the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store, and the pad elevation of the project site. The residents also had questions about the possible installation of a median on Highland Avenue and the installation of a right turn lane off Highland Avenue into the project. At the neighborhood meeting, City Planning staff answered the resident's questions and offered information regarding the entitlement process and the standards for commercial projects. The City advisory committees (Grading, Technical and Design) reviewed the project in January and recommended approval, subject to modifications being made. The applicant made the requested modifications, including, but not limited to, lowering the elevation of the building pad and adding architectural enhancements. Following review of the modifications by the Design Review Committee, the project was forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC April 7, 2004 Page 2 approval. On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719. At the public hearing, several residents cited their concerns about the glare, traffic circulation, crime, and alcoholic beverage sales. One resident indicated support for the proposed project, citing the need for a gas station in the Etiwanda Community. The appellant, Mr. James A. Martin, Jr., on behalf of several residents in the neighborhood immediately south of the proposed project, filed the subject appeal in a timely manner on February 17, 2004 (Exhibit "A"). .ANALYSIS: The appellant's February 17, 2004 letter has provided no new information. The appellant raises the following four issues in the appeal: Issue #1: "Inadequate safety and security from a high crime use open 24/7" Response: No data or specific information was presented at the public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting or included in the appeal regarding a correlation between gas stations and convenience stores and high crime. Planning staff contacted Dan Wafters, Crime Analyst for San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department at the Rancho Cucamonga station, and requested crime report information for a comparable use. Reports were generated from the existing Texaco/Del Taco gas station and convenience store at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. A history of calls for the past six months at the Texaco station yielded a total of six reports, five for petty theft and one for a general law enforcement call. Rancho Cucamonga has consistently been ranked as one of the safest cities of its size in the nation according to the FBI Uniform Crime Index. According to a special study of Law Enforcement Services in Rancho Cucamonga dated January 2001 (a special study prepared in conjunction with the General Plan Update), despite the City's growth, there has been a marked decrease in major crimes, including homicide, robbery, rape, assault, and theft since 1994. The City programs devoted to community safety have been modified to include more crime prevention and education programs, teen intervention, and the addition of School Resource Officers, thereby increasing the effectiveness of crime prevention and community awareness. At the public hearing, the Planning Commission added the following two project conditions regarding public safety and to protect against potential nuisance activities: 1) On-site security shall be provided Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings from 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 2) The project is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission 6 months after opening, including crime statistics and surrounding neighborhoc~d issues. Issue #2: "Light infiltration" Response: The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. However, no studies were presented to the Planning Commission or included in the appeal by the appellant demonstrating that glare would not remain within the proposed project's boundaries. Light fixtures have been designed to confine the area of illumination to the project site. Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC Apdi 7, 2004 Page 3 illumination to the project site. Further, a lighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. Issue #3: "An over-abundance of alcohol sales" Response: At the neighborhood meeting and pdblic hearing at the Planning Commission, several residents were opposed to the sale of alcoholic beverages from the convenience store because they felt that there would be enough stores nearby to pumhase alcoholic beverages. Existing, and projects under construction, that will include alcoholic beverages for offsite consumption include a gas station with a convenience market at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, and a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a Ralph's at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has no regulation prohibiting or otherwise limiting the concentration of businesses selling alcoholic beverages. The proposed project is located in the Village Commercial District, which allows alcoholic beverage sales at service stations with convenience stores subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed Conditional'Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine for offsite consumption only (Type 20 ABC license). The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distribution of liquor by setting limits on the different types in each Census Tract. If the applicant is unable to purchase an existing Type 20 ABC license, the applicant will have to apply for the issuance of new Type 20 license. Because of a moratorium on all new licenses within San Bernardino County, a determination of Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) will ultimately be required by the City Council prior to issuance of a new Type 20 ABC license, as governed by the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Council, has the greatest latitude based on local conditions and determinations. Staff believes that the applicant's request to include the sale beer and wine for offsite consumption to be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses and a common business practice associated with a gas station convenience store. Issue #4: "Serious traffic cimulation problems" Response: During the environmental analysis and the preparation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project, traffic impacts were analyzed. The project will generate a combined total of 200 two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station). The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use; therefore, the project is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. Further, the City's Traffic Engineer has informed the Planning Division that a traffic impact analysis is not required based upon the forecasted trip generation rates. Also, traffic along major streets was also analyzed as part of the Environmental Impact Report for the 2001 General Plan Update, adopted by the City Council on November 17, 2001. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC Aprit 7, 2004 Page 4 Residents at the public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting indicated that they felt that the project should be required to install a right deceleration lane into the project and raised median along Highland Avenue. The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the project site and has determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not require either a right turn deceleration lane or a raised median. SUMMARY: The proposed project consists of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on triangular-shaped parcel created by the construction of the 210 Freeway and Highland Avenue realignment. The project has been designed to meet or exceed all of the technical requirements of the Development Code without the need for additional entitlements, such as a Variance application for building setbacks or parking reductions. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that there would be no impact because vehicular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, would far exceed any noise generated by the project. During the environmental review, staff concluded that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short~term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. CORRESPONDENCE: As required by state law, this item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. A large 4 x 8-foot Notice of Filing sign was posted on the property upon which public hearing notices were conspicuously posted. The developer provided notice and conducted one neighborhood meeting. City Planner BB:DG:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appellant's Letter of Appeal dated February 17, 2004 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 11,2004 Exhibit "C"- Planning Commission Resolution 04-22 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Minutes dated February 11,2004 Draft Resolution to Deny Appeal for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 Fcbraary 17,2004 I:EI 1 92004 Ms. Debra Adam.% City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive CITY CLERK Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Request to Appeal Planning Commission Action Dear Ms. Adama~ The residents of Palo Verde Place, Mimosa Place and Myrtle Court wish to appeal the Planning Commission action to approve Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719- Pacific Globe, LLC, for the construction of a gas station, fast food and mini-mart in the Village Comraereial District located at the northeast enmer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. It is our strong belief that the Planning Commission did not adequately consider several impacts to the adjacent residential neighborhood including, but not limited to inadequate safety and security from a high crime use open 24/7, light infillrafion, an over-abundance of alcohol sales and serious traffic circulation problems. We have included a check in the amount of $126.00 for the filing of this appeal and request a City Council hearing at the earliest convenience. Should there be any questions or a need for additional information, please feel flee to contact any of the following: Mr. Edwin Villaroman Mr. Travis England Mr. James Martin 6561 Palo Verde 6573 Palo Verde 6527 Mimosa Place 463- 0878 899-6479 899-3895 Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. C: Mr. Edwin Villaroman Mr. Travis England THE CITY OF [~AN C [[0 CIJCAMONCA StaffRepor DATE: February 11,2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pro-Application Review DRC2003-00064. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North Route 210 Freeway South - Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acro), Victoria Community Plan East Highland Avenue and Route 210 Freeway West - Future Gas Station and Fast Food, Victoria Community Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commemial North - Route210 Freeway South - Low-Medium Residential East Highland Avenue and Route 210 Freeway West Neighborhood Commemial C. Site Characteristics: The triangular site is bounded by Day Creek Boulevard, the 210 Freeway and Highland Avenue. The site has an average grade of approximately 10 percent, sloping from north to south, and some areas have grades approaching 50 percent on existing, manufactured slopes. The site has 20 feet of fall from the northwest corner of the parcel to the southwest corner of the parcel. The site is constrained by the shape, and the existing topography. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11,2004 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Convenience 2,947 1/,250 12 store Fast food 2,504 1/75 33 Totals: 45 45 BACKGROUND: On February 12, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant. At the workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed project to be highly sensitive to the neighborhood to the south, and that the project was overbuilt. The Commission emphasized the importance of on-site cimulation, the requirement of outstanding architectural design, and the need to prevent glare on the residences to the south. In response to the Commission's comments, the applicant revised the elevations, reduced the floor area of the building and designed the site with proper circulation. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project has been designed with a stacked stone base, a tower feature and wood trellis feature with posts mounted on stacked stone bases in the drive-thru lane. Decorative concrete is used at both driveway entrances for a pedestrian connection from Highland Avenue and at the handicap parking stalls. The pad elevation of the convenience store and fast food restaurant is at the lowest elevation possible in order to minimize the impact of the project on the existing single-family neighborhood to the south. The architecture is compatible with the shopping center and gas station under construction at the southwest and northwest corners of the intersection. B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McPhail, Stewart and Fong) reviewed the project on January 6, 2004. At the meeting the applicant presented revised drawings, which satisfied several of the Major and Secondary Issues. The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the applicant revising the plans and scheduling the project as a Consent Calendar item at the January 20, 2004, meeting. The applicant agreed to make all of the requested changes. The Committee reviewed the revised project as a Consent Calendar item on January 20, 2004, and recommended approval. C. Gradinq Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on January 6, 2004. The Committee recommended approval, subject to the following conditions: 1) mounding shall only occur east of the east driveway in order to ensure adequate line-of- sight; 2) the frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and the slopes on the 210 Freeway eastbound onramp shall be landscaped; and 3) the building pad shall be lowered to the maximum extent possible, raised only what is necessary to accomplish adequate PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11,2004 Page 3 drainage. The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on January 6, 2004, and recommended approval subject to the standard conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff completed Part' II of the Environmental Checklist. The project ~ill create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. Light fixtures have been designed to confine the area of illumination to the project site. Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination to the project site. A lighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. The maximum foot candle illumination allowed from light standards on a project site to an adjacent property is 5-foot candles; therefore, the project meets the City's standard. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that there would be no impact because vehicular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, would far exceed any noise generated by the project. Staff concluded that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed project on January 5, 2004, at a nearby school (11 residents attended). Residents had questions about glare, traffic, the use of landscaping for screening purposes on the south side of Highland, the proposed hours of operation, the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store, and the pad elevation of the project site. The residents also had questions about the possible installation of a median on Highland Avenue and the installation of a right turn lane off Highland Avenue into the project. Staff offers the following responses to the residents concerns: Pad elevation: At the neighborhood meeting, several residents raised concerns about the pad elevation of the proposed convenience and fast food restaurant (1449.50). Since the neighborhood meeting, the applicant has lowered the pad to 1445.96 (3.5 feet). The pad elevation has been engineered to be as Iow as possible while still meeting the requirements of drainage and containment areas as required under Water Quality Management Plan. Glare: Light fixtures have been designed to confine the area of illumination to the project site. Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11,2004 Page 4 to the project site. A lighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the ex~sting single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. Traffic: The project will generate a combined total of 200 two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station). The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use; th, erefore, the project is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The City's Traffic Engineer has informed the Planning Division that a traffic impact analysis is not required based upon the trip generation rates. Median on Highland Avenue east of Day Creek Boulevard: The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the project site and has determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not require the construction of a median. Right turn lane into the prelect from the westbound side of Highland Avenue,' The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the project site and has determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland do not require the a right turn deceleration lane. Landscaping for screeninq purposes on the south side of Highland Avenue: The Engineering Division has included a condition of approval in the attached Resolution of Approval requiring the installation of missing public improvements on the south side of Highland Avenue from the west boundary line of Tract 12046, extending east along Lots 36, 37, and 44 of said tract. Improvements include a streetscape/rockscape-landscaping theme with street trees. Hours of operation: The applicant is requesting a 24-hour operation. At the neighborhood meeting, several residents were opposed to a 24-hour operation. Noise from the project will not impact the neighborhood to the south. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that the vehicular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the project. A light study was prepared for the project to assess the impacts of glare on the existing neighborhood to the south. According to the light study, ali residential lots to the south will have O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. Therefore, since noise and glare will not impact the residences to the south, a request for a 24-hour operation is reasonable. Sale of alcoholic beveraqes at the convenience storP.: At the neighborhood meeting, several residents were opposed to the sale of alcoholic beverages from the convenience store because they felt that there would be enough stores nearby to pumhase alcoholic beverages. The project is surrounded by a gas station with a convenience market to the west, and a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a major grocery store that will sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has no regulation prohibiting or otherwise limiting the concentration of businesses selling alcoholic beverages. The sale of beer and wine is allowed in the Village Commercial District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed Conditional Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine only for offsite consumption (Type 20 ABC license). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11,2004 Page 5 The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distribution of liquor by s~tting limits on the different types in each Census Tract. Because of a moratorium on all new licenses within San Bernardino County, a determination of public convenience will ultimately be required by the City Council, as governed by the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Council, has the greatest latitude based on local conditions and determinations. ,.. A determination of Public Convenience and Necessity will be required from the City Council before beer and wine sales can commence. Staff believes that the applicant's request to include the sale beer and wine for offsite consumption to be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses and a common business practice associated with a gas station convenience store. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DG:Is Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit"E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Trellis Elevations Exhibit "G" - Pump Canopy Elevations Exhibit"H" - Floor Plan Exhibit "l" - Roof Plan Exhibit "J" - City Monument Wall Elevations Exhibit "K" - Photometric Diagram Exhibit "L" - Design Review Comments and Action Agendas dated January 6 and 20, 2004 Exhibit "M" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 F R E E W A Y RTE 210 F R E E W A Y RTE 210 STATE RTE, 210 EAST9OUN9 ON-RAMP FIRETHDRN STREET CO~ENIENCE STORE, FASTFOOD R ESTAU F~a, NT (JITB), SERVICE STATION NOn~ ~ SITE UTILIZATION MAP .~CALE: 1" = 50'-0" STATE RTE. 210 EASTBDUNI) DN-RAMP ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~/// ~ =~-.~-- ........ ~~~~/~~ ~-~ ........... CHTECTURA I E P~N - ~ ~ SiTE P~N ~& AS-1 .... -~., .:..,~.~__=__=.______ASTBOUND-RTE 210 £ ON-RAMP ,-::: N-3 ,,-'~ "~='"' N-I N-2 ,- ~ .- / .................. L~___t__~_? ~,,~ ......................... ~.~ _, , ,/ ,,- , ,, ~ #' ~ Y l~1 '~~ _-~ .~ ~f/~' >%/ _: ,,,, , ...~~ A.~..... _ , ....... . .... ~ , t '; ~ I lid, ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - / / ~:;, . ........ %_~ W / /~ ~ ~-~-~.'- _~ GRADING ~ ~r: ~5''- -/- PARCEL 1 AND .~.:~::. .~ _.~.'- ~ ~_~_~._. ~ 1089--401--66 / ,, ,' N-1 ~ONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN! PARCEL I AND 2 APN. 1089--121--08 AND 1089--401--66 CROSS--SEC~ONS CONCEP~AL GRADING PLANI PARCEL I AND 2 I I .~'F ~-- -,,-- ......... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:::: ~:~:::::: :~~:~:~:~:E:~S~:~:E:~:E:~:~:~:~:~:~:~.~ ......... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~ ~ ' . . ~- I~ , ll~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~__~~ ........ ~. ~_. ......... .,..,. ~?~.~., J ,.~,.,~.~..,..,..,, ~, .,,.~, ..... . ........... ,.,..~ ........~i~,,,-~ ~!~ , ~ ~.~:)'T~:;T;~'..C..~' ;- "~?;-':~:. ::.t~WEST ELEVATION .... , ,, ~ ~ ~:.. . .....:.,...~ ~ ........ , . ~ - . .~ ~ ~, . . .. .... ~ ~ ~,~ ~'~ .' "'%:%.?'. ,.%', :::: .'" r:*. ~~~~~:-~'.'.:~ ~ ~.:~ ~ .:~::~%." ..'% Z%.%:"* EAST ELEVATION :~:~_'~- ~- ,- ,= ........ . ........ <> ~~ LONG E~VATIONS ~ A-2.1 _.-- ~- Q$OUTH ELEVATION CO~ENIE~E STORE, FASTFOOD RESTAURANT (JITB), SERVICE STATION au,~,N~ S,~E_~AT,ONS TRELLIS PLAN Q DETAIL 1 TRELLIS DETAILS ELEVATION ! ~ ELEVATION 2 CONVENIENCE STORE, FASTFOOD RESTAURANT (JITE), SERVICE STATION FLAT LENS ENCORE CHALLENGER DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Donald Granger January 6, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commemial District, located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064. Background: On February 12, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant. At the workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed project to be highly sensitive to the neighborhood to the south, and that the project was overbuilt. The Commission emphasized the importance of good on-site circulation, the requirement of outstanding architectural design, and the need to prevent glare on the residences to the south. In response to the Commission's comments, the applicant has scaled down the square footages of the buildings and designed the site with good circulation. Design Parameterai The project site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, on a triangular parcel created by the realignment of Highland Avenue and the 210 Freeway. The site has an average grade of approximately 10 percent, sloping from north to south, and some areas have grades approaching 50 percent on existing, manufactured slopes. The site has 20 feet of fall from the northwest corner of the parcel to the southwest comer of the parcel. The site is constrained bythe shape, and the existing topography. The project has been designed with a stacked stone base, tower feature and wood trellis feature with posts mounted on stacked stone bases in the drive-thru lane. Decorative concrete is used at both driveway entrances, for a pedestrian connection and at the Handicap parking stall. Staff Comments: . The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Grading of the project is critical to minimize the impact on the existing single-family homes to the south. The proposed pad of the gas station and convenience store is approximately 2 to 9 feet higher than the Highland Avenue street elevation. The proposed pad should be lowered several feet and be elevated only what is necessary to accomplish adequate drainage. The applicant should revise the grading design to minimize the impact of the project, even if retaining walls are necessary. 2. The battered, tapered architectural wall planes are typical and create awkward geometry in the form of the building. Staff does not encourage the uses of battered wall planes. Strong consideration should be given to eliminating the battered wall planes and using traditional shapes that fit with overall building form. 3. At the east elevation, the tower feature has an extensive amount of vertical wall plane that is void of enhancement. The tower feature should be redesigned, with elements that provide variation, such as arches or porticos. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. January 6, 2004 Page 2 4. All aluminum awnings should be eliminated on the west and east elevations, and replaced with suspended, large-member, decorative wood trellis that projects from the wall plane a midimum of 2 ¼ feet. 5. The south and north elevations should receive some additional architectural enhancement, such as suspended wood trellis, quatrefoils, or accent tile framed by a contrasting stucco surround. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues h~,e been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Additional stacked stone should be added to the convenience store/fast food building. The 2-foot high stacked stone base is too small to provide a materials contrast from the stucco wall plane. The stacked base should be raised to a minimum height of 3 ~ feet. On the east elevation, stacked stone should be added to completely cover the trapezoidal wall plane over the entrance to Jack in Box. 2. Colored concrete and enhanced paving should be used at the following locations: · Colored terracotta concrete should be used under the pump island. · Eliminate stamped concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection and replace with colored concrete with score lines. 3. The six columns supporting the pump island canopy should have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap, thereby matching the architecture of the convenience store and fast food restaurant. Stacked stone should extend from the base of columns up to a minimum of 8 feet. 4. The columns supporting the wood trellis should be enlarged in order to make a greater architectural statement and presence. Staff suggests the following dimensions: 2 feet by 2 feet base with stacked stone carried to the bottom of the posts, and 12 inches by 12 inches wood posts. 5. The monument signs should blend into the grades and berms. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. 2. Undulating berms in the landscaped setback areas shall be provided to provided to create to visual interest and to screen parking areas. 3. All lighting, whether mounted on the building or on freestanding poles, shall be designed a confine the light canopy to the site boundaries. 4. All lighting, whether mounted on the building or on freestanding poles, shall be architecturally compatible with the building design. 5. The project shall conform to the Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan and shall have 10-foot sidewalk, matching the projects to the north and south. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. January 6, 2004 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee pdor to being scheduled for Planning Commission. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Donald Granger At the meeting the applicadt presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Major and Secondary Issues. The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. The proposed pad shall be lowered several feet and be elevated only what is necessary to accomplish adequate drainage. 2. The battered, 'tapered architectural wall planes shall be eliminated and replaced with square wall planes. 3. At the east elevation, the tower feature shall include an amh. The Committee supported the revision made by the applicant, but indicated the tower need additional enhancement, such as accent tile framed by a stucco surround. 4. All aluminum awnings shall be eliminated on the east and west elevations and replaced with suspended, large,member, decorative wood trellis that projects from the wall plane a minimum of 2 ~ feet. If necessary, the wood trellis shall be suspended by wood, not cables. 5. The south and north elevations shall receive additional architectural enhancement, in the form of score lines, matching the east elevation. 6. Additional stacked stone shall be added to the convenience store/fast food building. The stacked base should be raised to a minimum height of 3 ~ feet. On the east elevation, stacked stone shall be added to completely cover the wall plane over the entrance to Jack in Box. 7. Black concrete shall be used under the pump island. The stamped concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection shall be eliminated and replaced with colored concrete with score lines. 8. The six columns supporting the pump island canopy shall have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap, thereby, matching the architecture of the convenience store and fast food restaurant. Stacked stone shall extend from the base of the columns up a minimum of 8 feet. 9. The columns supporting the wood trellis shall be enlarged in order to make a greater architectural statement and presence. The following dimensions shall be used: 2 by 2-foot base with stacked stone carried to the bottom of the posts and 12 by 12-inch wood posts. 10. The monument signs shall blend into the grades and berms. Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 11. All cornices shall have finished ends and wrap around where the wall plane returns 90 degrees. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. January 6, 2004 Page 4 12. The pumps island canopy shall have a mansard roof with tile. 13. The project will have a decorative concrete and a plaza, matching the project at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that the project be scheduled for review on Consent Calendar at the January 20, 2004, Design Review Meeting. The applicant agreed to make the requested changes. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 7:00 P.M. Donald Granger January 20, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre- Application Review DRC2003-00064. At the January 6, 2004, DRC meeting the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Major and Secondary Issues. The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project and recommend approval with conditions (see attached action comments). The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that the project be scheduled for review on Consent Calendar at the January 20, 2004 Design Review Meeting. The applicant agreed to make the requested changes. REVISED PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Desi,qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Donald Granger At the meeting, staff presented revised drawings, which satisfied the Major, Secondary, and additional issues the Design Review Committee raised at its January 6, 2004, meeting. The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM. (Part I - Initial StudY) CJty of Rancho Cucamonga (Please ~ype or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Oivf~on (909) 477-2750 The INCOMPLETE APPLICA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibilib/ of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project TYde: '-'--~.4~.~,~-~ ~. ~ ~' Name & Addres$ of project owner(s): ~'~,'~ ~/,~'/ ~--- ~.> ~ 0~ ~-~ ~ ~ Name & Address of developer or project Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): ~TelephoneNumber: EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page I of 9 Created on 5/27_/2002 4:09 PM,~5 ~) Information indicated by an astedsk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. 't) Provide a full scale (8- I/2 x I f) ~opy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site beundades. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) prcject Location (descdbe): _/{./'o~6~'~ ~',4~.~ 2'- (P~'.4/Lr,~ ~P,t~ //./~'~,~/~,~'~ ~/'~ . 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necescary): l o ,5"P- /~/ ,ev s/- edco *5) Gross Site Ama (ac/sq. ft.): /,z[ T P Z *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): /. '/7 '~ /~.~.~ //~ ~ qq7 ..re ~'r. 7) Descdbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affecJ the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: ~ry-.,; .' ~,,.~9/,//_. rTq.. P,~,../~. : .~'z~.c,7-,O,.e'/o~_. /4~"~,,,',~,w~,~_. 9) Describe tho physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Descdbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and]or hydrologic studies, biotic and archoological surveys, traffic studies): Environmenta,nfoforml.doc Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/2212002 4:09 PM 10) Describe the known cultural and/o; historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): ~ 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate ff there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM 13) Descdbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of tand use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, mar yard, etc.): 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these t5) noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing ara proposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: ~ 7) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:09 PM 18) indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commemial/Ind. (gal/day~ac) Peak use (gal/rain/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. [] Septic Tank [] Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is propose~ indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarffication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-259t. a. Residential (gal~day) b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day~ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: ~ Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Atiached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Pdce(s) $ to $ Rent (permonth) $. to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: EnvironmentallnfoForml.doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 5~22~2002 4:09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a, Elementary: b. Junior High: c, Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describetype~fuse(s)andmej~rfuncti~n(s)~fc~mmercia~~industria~~rinstituti~na~uses:~ 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operetion: ~' 1~00~5'. 28) Number of employees: Total: [~) Maximum Sh~: .- ~ Time of Maximum Shift: <i~'f~x~ "'5'-' ~ /~I_ . 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessaq/): 30) Estimationofthenumberofworkerstobehiredthatcurrentlyresideinthe City: *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through lhe South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): Environmen~lln%Fo~l.doc Page 6 of g Creat~ on ~2N2002 4:09 PM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their abilfly to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their re~sponse. 33) In the known histo~ of this prope~, has them been any use, storage, or discha~e of haza~ous an~or toxic materials? Examples of haza~ous ancot toxic materials include, b~ am not fimfled to PCB's; mdi~ctive sub~an~s; pesticides and he.icicles; ~els, oils, solvents, and o~er flammable fiquids and gases. Also note unde~und ~omge of any of ~e above. Please list ~e materials and descdbe ~eir use, storage, an~or discha~e on the pmpe~, as we8 as the dates of use, E known. * 34) Will the proposed p~j~ involve ~e tempom~ or Iong-te~ use, stooge or discha~e of haza~ous an~or toxic matedals, including b~ not lim~ to ~ose examples listed above? If yes, pro,de an invento~ of afl such materials to be us~ and prop~ meth~ of dispo~l. ~e I~afion of such uses, along ~h ~e ~omge and shipment ames, shall be sho~ and labeled on the appfi~on plans.. , furnished above and in the a~ached exhib~s present the da~ and inflation required ~r I hereby ~ that the state~ents ............ m=,~ = ts statements, andinfo~afionpmsentedam ~eand~ ~d~nuate evaluation of this project ~ me ees[ o~ my uum~y, ,,~ -~ ~,7 , ~.~ ..... h~ mnuimd to be subm~ed bemm an be made by the C~ of Rancho Cu~nga. EnvironmentallnfoForml-doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4:0~M~ ¢ DRC2003-00719 LOCATION MAP 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles .... , 37760eon,.N. i7'30" ROAD CLASS'iFICATmON Hea~-du~ Light-du~ ~ Medium-du~ ..... Unimproved di~ CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF. RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT .~/~ o~.~o ,s' ~U~GL[ L~TION 4295 ~AiN ~ { HEET 34117-B5-TF-024 ..... I ..... ~E, CA 92501 Revisions shown in purple and ~lano compue~(~i ~-05 ~fl 1966 aerial phot~phs taken 1985 and other ~urce oa[a. '~ ~ PHOTOREVISED 1988 Pi~III c~k ~ U,S, F~t ~ice, Map ~it~ 1988 D~A 2452 ~] HE--SERIES V895 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064 3. Desc~ription of Project: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commemial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089- 401-66. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Pacific Globe LLC 1639 W. Foothill Boulevard Upland, CA 91786 Contact: Tony Dehbozorgi 5. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commemial 6. Zoning: Neighborhood Commemial 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 1.48 acre site is bordered by the 210 freeway eastbound onramp to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Highland Avenue to the south and east. The site is presently occupied by invasive weeds, and no structures occupy the site. To south and east, across Highland Avenue, is an existing single-family subdivision. To west, across Day Creek Boulevard, a gas station/convenience store with fast food that are under construction. To the southwest is a neighborhood shopping center, including a grocery store, that is under construction. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR - Environmental Impact Report FEIR - FinaJ Environmental Impact Report NOx - Nitrogen Oxides ROG - Reactive Organic Gases Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 2 PM~o - Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (v') Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (v') Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (v') Cultural Resources (,,') Geology/Soils ) Hazards & Hazardous (v') HydrologyNVater Quality ( ) Land Use/Planning Materials ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Population/Housing ) Mineral Resources (,,') Noise ( ) Transportation/Traffic ) Public Sen/ices ( ) Recreation ) Utilities/Sen/ice Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (¢') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: ~.~'~-',,.~.,-,~_ Date: December 22, 2003 Reviewed~By: Date: ~,~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ __ Rev. 7/22/03 ,~ ~'/ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) (-") ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") not limited to, trees, reck outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ( ) () (v') ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is within the Day Creek Boulevard view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15. Although the site is located within a view corridor, the buildings will be setback 51 feet from Day Creek Boulevard and 47 feet from Highland Avenue, which exceed the minimum setbacks. The building and canopy will be under the 25-foot height limit. The buildings, site design and landscape palette will not obstruct views of the north-south Day Creek Boulevard scenic corridor. The impact is considered less than significant. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The 1.48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest. To the north is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to undergreund existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. A lighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. The maximum foot candle illumination allowed from light standards on a project site to an adjacent property is 5 foot candles; therefore the project meets the City's standard. The impact is considered less than significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") Williamson Act contract? I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ,.,pa c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in, conversion of Farmland. to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The 1.48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commemial development to the west and southwest. To the north is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands pamels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. ~ The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The 1.48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest. To the north is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp. The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 mile to the southeast. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (v') ( ) 0 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) number of people? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 5 Impacl In~c ~'~d Irn~act Irr~act Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W~h Than .Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary soumes, heavy-duty constrbction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga ama. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are riot new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. · Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Rev. 7/22/03 2 Z~.~/. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 6 IL .Th I I - Significant Lsss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than · Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. · Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. · Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound ei~gineering practices. · Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. · Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Board [RWQCB]) daily to re, duce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~0 would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. Rev. 7/22/03 ,,¢~ ~Z~, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Si~flcant No 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After impleme'ntation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEiR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the .pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEiR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. ~1) Sensitive receptors am defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centem, convalescent centers, retirement, homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they am located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptom and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401.. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor: single family residences. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, them is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) ('") through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/') or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Rev. 7/22/03 ,~ ~/f~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 8 I[ I Th . I I I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiaJly With Than C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other m, eans? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or imPede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the previsions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residences to the south and east, and future commemial to the west and southwest. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments; hence, is void of any significant vegetation. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments; hence, is void of any significant vegetation. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding.developments; hence, is void of any significant vegetation. There are no heritage trees or mature trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Rev. 7/22/03 initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 9 Less Than Significant LeSS Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Than 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,") significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.57 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (v') ( ) 0 significance of.an amheological resource pursuant to § 15064.57 c) Direct~ly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (,,') ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: ' a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known amheological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resoumes. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to reonitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: · Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. · Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. · Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. · Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 10 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Ran sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project.site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: · Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing-activities. · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has comFleted salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. · Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure, 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the projech. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( ) Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W'~th Than C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have,soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Comments: ' a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-l, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately .7 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.5 mi~es north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 7.5 northeast of the site and the San Andmas, capable of up to M~, 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 10 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Although the site is located within the buried/uncertain segment of the Red Hill Fault, mitigation and special studies are only required for critical facilities since subsurface investigations have not yielded evidence of its existence. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts am less than significant. b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, reads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 26 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. Rev. 7/22/03 25~) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 12 II I I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I sPi,°~yt Iln~i~!a~d I SilLn~Ti ;~n, 'J~3Oact 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas .that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of ~vater from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types onsite consist of Soboba stony loamy sand, with slopes ranging from 2 to 9 pement, according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. Soboba stony loamy sand soils usually have slow runoff, and the hazard of erosion is minimal. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types onsite consist of Soboba stony loamy sand, wth s opes rang ng from 2 to 9 percent, according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. Soboba stony loamy sand soils usually have'slow runoff, and the hazard of erosion is minimal. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be sewed by, the existing local sewer systerh for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/) hazardous materials sites compited pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W~h Than g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas er where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will involve the transport and use disposal of hazardous materials (automobile gasoline and motor oils). The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management Syste~ Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project does include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potentiat for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within a Y~ mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. Typically, with the required safety precautions and applicable building and fire codes, the proposed gas station and fast food uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. The project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 14 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I ,rr, a~ I,noor~rated J ,mp.~ I J~ I Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) (-/) ( ) ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would bea net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (v') ( ~ 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the 'site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development qitywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, ~eepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is more than 1 acre; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 16 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I ,.~.~ 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent With the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the' City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (I.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. ~ h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is' flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) , ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) or natural community conservation plan? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 17 Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Than Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest. To the north is the 210 freeway and eastbound onramp. This project will be of similar design and size to planned commercial development at the northwest and southwest corners of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The architecture, landscape design and site design will minimize the impacts of noise and glare on the adjacent neighborhood to the south. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Village Commercial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area according to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR.. The project site was previously graded when the 210 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard on ramp was constructed. As such, the site does not presently contain any significant vegetation. Therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (-,/) mineral resoume recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resoumes Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-l, as a valuable minerai resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 18 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W~th 3q3an d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') where such a plan has not been adopted,~within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. The City's Development Code requires t~at all commemial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, therefore no adverse impact is anticipated on employees or customers of the project. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposec~ gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that a detailed noise is not needed because the vehiclular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the project. A noise consultant also evaluated the traffic noise impacts to the interior dining area and recommended the following mitigation measures listed below will: 1) The building shall be constructed with insulation in the walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the restaurant area. The General Plan FEiR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Rev. 7/22/03 ~ ~' 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 19 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SignifiC~ltP°tential~Y Mifiga§onWith Slgnificant~lan No The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce groundborne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site the determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that a detailed noise is not needed because the vehiclular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the project. d) See a) response above. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~') directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Disptace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 20 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiaJly With Than Signi~cant Mitigatiofl Sigraficant No number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired.from within the City or surrounding communities. Ne impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) ~(./) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) tv') d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, will be served by a fire station located approximately 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated.] d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 21 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Than construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (./) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deter!oration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 of a mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will re.quire the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 22 Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) { ) ( ) (~') {e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or . incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).'? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) 0/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? *' ( ) ( ) ( ) (,~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) { ) ( ) (./) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bioyc!~ racks)? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project will generate a combined total of 200 two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station). The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use; therefore, the project is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 23 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyw~h Than g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Aha Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev. 7/22/03 ,,,,~ ~,,~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 24 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyW~th Than d) The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) residential development of moro than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commemial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 sqaare feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying moro than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) a project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. ' The City has determined that the project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev. 7/22/03 ,,~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 25 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenti~ly With Tllan 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future proje~ts)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will ( ) ( ) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 26 construction activities were completed. The Initial Study !dentified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels, Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. / EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section , 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamcnga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (,,') General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (./) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (v') Letter from Ellwyn Brickson & Associates, Community Noise Assessments (dated September 11,2003) (v') Light Study/PhotO)metric Diagram (dated December 18, 2003) Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00719 Page 27 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study, I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sign.~an.~,,~ental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: ////J~ Date: -J~F~'~-/~cP~ 2 ?, ,~ _~ Print Name and Title: -'~'~,7' ~-~ -~-~ -~,'~ ~-'7'~ ' /~' ~ i:~lanning\final'~plngcomm~envdoc~rc2003-O0719is,doc Rev. 7/22/03 RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 A RESOLUTION OF'THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2003-00719, FOR A GAS STATION WITH PUMP ISLAND CANOPY, AND A SINGLE BUILDING CONTAINING A 2,947 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE AND 2,504 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON 1.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 1089-121-08AND 1089-401-66. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Globe LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 5th day of January 2004, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting, attended by 11 residents, to present the proposed project and obtain community feedback. 3. On the 11th day of February 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February '11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, with a total street frontage of approximately 893 feet and an average lot depth of approximately 150 feet, which is presently unimproved; and b. The property to the north and east of the subject site is the Route 210 Freeway, the property to the south is developed with single-family homes within the Victoria Community Plan, and the property to the west has an approved entitlement for a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant; and c. The application proposes the construction of a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant with a drive-thru lane, a Conditionally Permitted Use within the Victoria Community Plan;' and d. The proposed building elevations exhibit a high level of architectural design, incorporating stacked stone, score lines, a tower feature, and decorative pavement; and pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 2 e. The proposed project has adequate off-street parking for all proposed uses; and f. The proposed project has been designed with a pad elevation that is as Iow as possible, given the site constraints and engineering tolerances required, in order to minimize the impacts of the project on the existing single-family residences to the south. g. The existing grade of the project site sits higher than the adjoining public streets. The proposed project grading scheme has been designed with a pad elevation of. 1445.96. The pad elevation has been engineered to be as Iow as possible while still meeting the requirements of drainage and containment areas as required under Water Quality Management Plan. h. The project design includes light f'~xtures designed to confine the area of illumination to the project site. Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination to the project site. A lighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. i. The project will generate a combined total of 200, two-way, peak hour tdps for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station). The amount of two-waytdps is less than 1,000, two-way peak hour tdps for retail land use; therefore, the project is below the threshold of the San Bemardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. j. The City's Traffic Engineer determined a localized traffic impact analysis is not required based upon the trip generation rates. The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the project site and has determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant the construction of a median on Highland Avenue east of Day Creek Boulevard. The City's Traffic Engineer has also evaluated the project design and determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant a right turn deceleration lane from the westbound side of Highland Avenue. k. The application contemplates a 24-hour operation, 7 days a week. An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south. The acoustical consultant concluded that there would be no adverse impact to surrounding homes because vehicular traffic noise from the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard, and Highland Avenue would far exceed any noise generated by the project. A light study was prepared for the project to assess the impacts of glare on the existing neighborhood to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have ' O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project. I. The application contemplates the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store. The sale of beer and wine is allowed in the Village Commercial District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, in accordance with the zoning regulations of the Victoda Community Plan. The proposed Conditional Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine only for offsite consumption ('rype 20 ABC license). The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distribution of liquor by setting limits on the different types in each Census Tract. Because of a moratorium on all new licenses within San Bemardino County, a determination of public convenience will ultimately be required by the City Council, as governed by the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Council, has the greatest latitude based on local conditions and determinations. The sale of beer PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 3 and wine for offsite consumption is a common business practice associated with a gasjstation convenience store. The project is surrounded by a gas station with convenience market to the west, and a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a major grocery store that will sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 ' above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore rafiect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the meeting, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719- PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 4 Plannin.q Division 1) The project shall be developed in accordance with plans approved by the January 20, 2004, Design Review Committee meeting. 2) The proposed building pad shall be at an elevation of 1445.96. 3) The battered, tapered architectural wall planes shall be eliminated and replaced with square wall planes. 4) At the east elevation, the tower feature shall include an arch and accent tile framed by foam trim. 5) All aluminum awnings shall be eliminated on the east and west elevations and replaced with suspended, large-member, decorative wood trellis that projects from the wall plane a minimum of 2 1/2 feet. If necessary, the wood trellis shall be suspended by wood, not cables. Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 6) The south and north elevations shall receive additional architectural enhancement, in the form of score lines, matching the east elevation. 7) Additional stacked stone shall be added to the convenience store/fast food building. The stacked base shall be of 3 1/2 feet. On the east elevation, stacked stone shall be added to completely cover the wall plane over the entrance to the Jack in the Box restaurant. 8) Black concrete shall be used under the pump island. The concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection shall be colored concrete with score lines. 9) The six columns supporting the pump island canopy shall have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap. Stacked stone shall extend from the base of the columns up 8 feet. 10) The columns supporting the wood trellis shall be large size timber. The following dimensions shall be used: 24-inch base with stacked stone carried to the bottom of the posts. Posts shall be 12 inches by 12 inches. Beams shall be 5 1/8 inches by 18 inches and trellis members shall be 4 inches by 10 inches. 11) The monument signs shall blend into the grades and benms. Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. 12) All cornices shall have finished ends and wrap around where the wall plane returns 90 degrees. The back side of raised architectural features on the parapet shall have decorative cornices. 13) The pump island canopy shall have a mansard roof with tile, and lighting under the pump island canopy shall be recessed. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 5 14) The project will have a plaza with decorative concrete, matching the 'i project at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue (DRC2001-00638). Final design of the plaza shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval. The traffic signal controller box shall be relocated by the developer to either side of the entry monument sign. The final location of the box shall be approved ,. bythe City Planner and City Engineer. The building plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the plaza area with decorative concrete. 15) Berming within the landscape setback shall only occur east of the east driveway in order to ensure adequate line-of-sight; therefore, parking lots shall be screened by a combination of Iow decorative screen walls and continuous hedgerow. 16) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Corridor Master Plan, including, but not limited to, tree species and spacing, decorative hardscape, and a 10-foot wide concrete Community Trail. 17) The frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and the slopes on the 210 Freeway eastbound onramp shall be landscaped according to the approved landscape design by Caltrans. 18) The sidewalk along Highland Avenue shall terminate at the pedestrian connection west of the westerly driveway. 19) No outdoor dining area, customer seating or tables, is permitted because of parking limitations. 20) No exterior neon lighting is allowed, except within a sign canister or inside individual channelized letters. 21) No public telephones shall be placed on the property. 22) On-site secudty shall be provided Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings from 8 pm to 6 am. 23) The project is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission 6 months after opening, including crime statistics and surrounding neighborhood issues. 24) The final Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to building permit issuance. Enc~ineerin.q Division 1) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Corridor Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the following: a) Provide decorative street lighting and street trees. ,27/ pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 6 b) Privately maintained landscaping shall match the adjacent landscape maintenance distdct to the south and conform to the Day Creek Boulevard Beautification Master Plan plant palette; c)No driveways shall be constructed on Day Creek Boulevard frontage. d) Protect in place and replace/repair, as needed, the existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, striping and signage, including R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 2) Highland Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Collector" standards, including, but not limited to, the following: a. Provide ultimate curb and gutter, street trees, streetlights and asphalt pavement, as required. b. Provide property-line adjacent sidewalk from comer of Day Creek and Highland Avenue to the pedestrian access. c. Protect or replace existing P,26(s) "No Stopping" signs. Provide ultimate traffic striping and signage, as required. d. Stripe a 260-foot dedicated left turn lane for westbound traffic approaching Day Creek Boulevard. e. Stripe an 80-foot left turn lane for eastbound traffic at proposed easterly driveway with a 90-foot transition between this left tum lane and the lane in 2.d as noted above. f. West drive approach shall be right turn only. 3) Right-of-way on the north side of Highland Avenue shall allow a standard Collector Street parl~vay, 11 feet measured from the face of 4) City entry monument wall and comer treatment shall be consistent with the one approved for the northwest comer of Highland Avenue and Day Creek. Provide wall maintenance and sidewalk easement encompassing pedestrian areas accessible to the general public. 5) Developer shall complete the missing public improvements on the south side of Highland Avenue from the west boundary line of Tract 12046 extending east along Lots 36, 37, and 44 of said tract. Improvements include streetscape/rockscape- landscaping theme with street trees. 6) Secure a highway planting improvement agreement with Caltrans to landscape along the 210 Freeway on ramp and to provide for maintenance service and expenses in accordance with Caltrans requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 7 7) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. Toes of slopes shall be located outside the driveway lines of sight. Special pavement treatments in driveways shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 8) Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and , related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and ' Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition ara diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Police Department 1) Install and maintain a security camera for the convenience store in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 9.28.020 (Ordinance No. 548, 1995). Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All .paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. 4)All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719- PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 8 · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. · Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. · Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of larg~' areas to erosion over extended periods of time. · sChedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. · Dispose of surplus excavated matedal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carded over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a rasult of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon timeofyear of construction. · Suspend grading operations dudng high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altemative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans inc, Judea statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 9 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural ResoUrces 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ', · Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. · Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. · Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. · Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719- PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 10 · Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If ,construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. · Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quali~y 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-007-19 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 11 3) Pdor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to ~ the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharges Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) The building shall be constructed with insulation !n the walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the restaurant area. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the " Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tdps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '"'- ./[.arry?.~cNiel', Vice Chairman 277 pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 12 ATTEST: ~ -'-' x//' Bra,~-t~er, S[,~w;1~tary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM · Project File No.: DRC2003-00719 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This prOgram has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-00719 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each ,. measure is verified for compliance, no further,..action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. i:~planning~fina~p/ngcomm~envdoc~drc2003-00719mmp.doc MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-00719 Applicant: Pacific Globe LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Gran,qer~ Assistant Planner Date: Au,qust 13~ 2003 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C ' Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating ~ondition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. ~:~ Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 ~ 1 of 6 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. · Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Review of Plans A by the City if sift is carried over to adjacent public 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction, · Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., CE C Review of Plans A wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with 4 Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other soil CE C 'Reviewof Plans A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.__ The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans NC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Reviewof Plans NC 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). _- ~ All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 . preferential parking for vanpools. ~; 2of6 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiencyflow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and ..weather-stripping. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require. CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. archaeolo~icalPUrsue educatingheritage.the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of Report ND 3/4 Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of Report ND 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of Report ND 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~ 3 of 6 A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Revlewof Report ND 4 field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B ReviewofReport ND equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time the interval of earth-disturbin,(] activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Reviewof Report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) Construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. -- Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site, Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes. __ 4of6 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of. Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDE$ General Construction Permit. The building shall be constructed with insulation in the BO/CP C During A 4 walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the Construction ~,,.~estau rant area. 5 of 6 Construction or grading shale not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, · Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass -- sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee S - Prior To Constrectlon B - Other Agency P~rmit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separeta=Subnaittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit o~onds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP ~ 7 - Citation ~ 6 of 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 SUBJECT: GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE AND FAST FOOD RESTAURANT APPLICANT: PACIFIC GLOBE LLC LOCATION: NEC OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements comoletion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relJeve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-22, Standard / / Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if __/ / building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~ /__ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ___/ /__ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Project No. DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / State Fire Marshal regulations have been c?mplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Buil~Jng and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be i__/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __./ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachmenl building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. ' 6. Approval of this request shali not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / _/ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~ / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and ~ / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real ~:iver rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured /___/__ products. D, Shopping Centers 1. A uniform hardscape 'and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, /___/ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the amhitectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City / / Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). ___/ / b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to __/__/__ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. / / d. Roll-up doors. ~ / SC-10-03 2 Project No. DRC2003-00719 Completion Date e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. / /___ f. Amhitecturally treated overhead shade trellis. / /~ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed / /___ to be hidden from view. 3. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. only. ' / / 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / 5. The entire site shall be kept free frem trash and debris at ali times and in no event shall trash and /.__/ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated intorthe lease agreements for all tenants: a. . Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an / / exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No.person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or / / other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other- similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 7. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. ___/ / They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza ._._/ / area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required bythe Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doorc to match main / / building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts / / a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across cimulation aisles shall be provided /.~/ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / / and exits shall be striped per City standards. SC-10-03 3 ,~O~ Project No. DRC2003-O0719 Completion Date 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~__/ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. I 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /~ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily /__./ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required ,. automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum Df a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 Dr greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in .__/ / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within / / commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes Df 5 feet or more in v~rtical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 /.__/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -galloh or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and va~ slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in / / the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Day Creek Boulevard and HJ.qhland Avenue. SC-10-03 4 ~'~ Project No,DRC2003-O0719 Completion Date 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the .__/ /__ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. AII walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the __/__/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / /___ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of ~this approval. /__/ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and /__/ approval prior to, issuance of building permits. J, Environmental 1. · Mitigation measures are required for th~ project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of /___/ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: ~ / a. Site/Pict Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Ptumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. __/ / Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. SC-10-03 $ ~¢~/ Project No. DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to /_ / the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. I / / 5. Business. shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the /.___/ Building and Safety Division. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001 ). The applicant shall comply with the ,, latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commemial or industrial development project or / / major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /_._/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / / counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~/ / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _~/ / 3. Provide draft stops Jn attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC .~/ / Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A / / 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / / 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / / N, Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading /.__ __ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~ / time of application for grading plan check. SC-10-03 6 ,,~'~'2 Project No. DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ___/ / submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ___/ / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . · O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made'Of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline): Varies tota'l feet on Hi,qhland Avenue _~._._/ Varies total feet on Day Creek Boulevard __/ / 2. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. -~/ / 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the ~ / final map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be ___/ / dedicated to the City. P. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a soume / / of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, ~0r units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: .~/ / /Daycreek B°ulevardstreet Name /Gutter / Pvmt / walk / Appr. /Lights/ Tr~.s j Trail I Island I Trail IOtherl J HighlandAvenue / X ~ X ~ X [ X / X / X ] I I I I 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. SC-10-03 7 ~J Project No. DRC2003-00719 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ___/ /__ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved bythe City Engineer Notes: 1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shal! be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City /_._/ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __/ / adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be prov'ded to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / / 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the Cites street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / / legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right te adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name / Space Spacing Size* Day Creek Boulevard Washingtonia Mexican Fan / 4' 25' O.C. 15' Min. Master Plan robusta* Palm B.T.H. or from sb'eet light heights Pyryscallerana Arist°crat / 4' / 25'O'C' 'Aristocrat' Pear Staggered of walk Informal Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O.C. 15 Gal populneus Background Highland Avenue Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' O.C. 24" Box indica Hybrid-Pink I 'Muskogeei' sc. o3 Project No. DRC2003-O0719 Completion Date *TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4)Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 7. A permit shall be obtaine~l imm Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way: Day Creek / / Boulevard and the 210 eastbound on ramp. Q, Public Maintenance Areas 1. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective /___/ Beautification Master Plan for Day Creek Boulevard. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filled with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer, R, Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the ~ / property from adjacent areas. S. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, / / telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /.__/__ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from a~ utilities and other interested agencies involved. Building permit issuance will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: Caltrans. / / 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~__/__ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. sc. 0.03 , Project N.o,DRC2003-00719 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate da¢k areas around the buildings, with /. / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. ' 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistan{'fixtures. / /.~ V. Security. Hardware 1. A secondary locking devi~e shall be installed on.all sliding glass doors. /.~/ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bo~ts Shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within /.__/ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, ___/ / or alarmed. W. Windows 1. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. / / 2. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede __/__/ entry to burglars. X. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of co~rasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be / /___ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Standard Conditions November 20, 2003 LHI~ Platte, LLC Pacific Globe, LLC 12340 Highland Convenience Store, Service Station and Fast Food Restaurant. DRC2003-00719 The applicant must submit to Fire Construction Services a Fire flow letter from CCWD when submitting for building plan check. FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS The following items are listed only as information to the applicant regarding procedures and requirements as they relate to this project. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1. General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commemial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. c. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft. d. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft. e. Fire hydrants are to be located: 1. At the entrance(s) to a project from the existing public roadways. This includes subdivisions and industrial parks. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs. 5. The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire. 6. Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. Contact the Fire Construction Services Unit at 909-477-2713 2. Minimum Fifo Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verificf~fion of fire flow availability for the proposed project. Contact the Fire Construction Services Unit (909) 477-2713 3. Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix 'Ill-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards. 4. Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. Contact the Fire Construction Services Unit (909) 477-2713 5. Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1. Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site tiro hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight. Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2. Number of Fire Hydrants: Provide one fifo hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements. Contact the Fifo Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3. Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fifo sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval. Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1. Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic tiro sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following: i. Group A Occupancies Contact the Fire Construction Services Unit (909) 477-2713 FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fifo District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction. 2. Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 26-feet. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). 3. Fire Lane Identification: All required red curbing and signage shall identify fire lanes. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard. FSC-5 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the projects operations or building construction. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information: Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1. Operate a place of public assembly. 2. Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use). Rancho Cucamonga Fire Code prohibits storage of flammable and combustible liquids in outside aboveground storage tanks. 3. Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capacity). On a scaled site plan show the occupancy or use of all buildings within a ~ mile radius. Storage exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capacity is not permitted within ~ mile of residential areas. 4. Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation. FSC-6 Hazardous Materials - Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8412 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cai/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Certificete of Occupancy Restrictions: If the facility is a NEVV business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the app cant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 386-8412 for forms and assistance. FSC-8 Plan Submittal Required Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical Code; Health and Safety Code; Public Resources Code; and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards. I NOTE: In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1. Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and Calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans." Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 3. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan ~howing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Contact the Fire Construction Services (909)477-2713 4. Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personneJ shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Water District to schedule testing. 5. Combustible Construction Letter- Required Letter: Pdor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 2. Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to Fire Construction Services. 3. Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 4. Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 5. Sprinkler Monitoring: The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. ~ 6. Fire Suppression System: Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Constructio~ Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 7. Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection. 8. Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided. These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards. Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 9. Address- Other Than Single-family: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 12-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 10. Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 11. Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- County Review: The plans for flammable or hazardous liquid storage tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division/Tank Program. Contact County Fire Dept. at (909) 386-8407 12. Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- Fire District Review: The plans for hazardous or flammable liquid storage tanks shall also be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division. Contact RC Fire Dept. at (909) 477-2770. 13. Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption. Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 386-8412. 14. Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan - New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District. In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs. Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713. 15. Risk Management Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility. Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8412. 16. Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Commissioner Stewart asked if there would be a plaque that will name the house. Sutton replied that the Society talked about having something to designate the house and they display to show the significance of having the first switchboard in the area. She said Mr. supportive of trying to aesthetically work that in. She felt comfortable the applicant staff to design an apprepdate plaque for the building. Stewart felt it should be something that really stands out. Gwyn Frost, rd Member of Etiwanda Histodc Society, 12996 Victoda Street, Rancho Cucamonga, ~n historian and noted it was the first house that Jim Frost's grandmother lived o the area in 1916 and was the location of the first telephone switchboard in She noted that on occasions when parking is not available at the school, there should at the histodc homes across the street. She supported West End Family Counseling. Headng no ~ Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stewart stated s was concerned about parking when she first read the staff report but following a site visit, ore comfortable. Noting the use, the understanding that the majodt~ and the support of the Etiwanda Historical Society; she felt it is a great use. She expressed a ~e renovations of the Norton Fisher House. She supported the project. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he felt it ~biotic relationship that will suit the City well. He said his only concern was regarding the type services but he understood from Mr. Shafer that it would be mostly children and famil He noted the brochure provided to the Commissioners indicated there are more serious counseling that Mr. Shafer stated would not be at the Rancho Cucamonga facility. He q~ Permit restricts the type of counseling conducted. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated the conditional use as restrictive as the Commission determines is appropriate. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he had no objections if it is to family and child counseling. Commissioner McPhail concurred it is a great use and a ~ the house into its prominence. Vice Chairman McNiel felt it is a great marriage and a great opportunity. Motion: Moved by McPhail, seconded by Stewart, to adopt the Permit DRC2003-01015. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MAClAS - carried C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1.48 acres of land in the Village Commercial ~?' 'T~ ~1 District, located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 11, 2004 APN: 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064. Donald Granger, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report an~ noted staff received one telephone call and an email regarding the hours of operation and the availability of beer and wine. He reported staff also received two telephone calls supporting the use and those callers stated there are not enough gas stations in the area. Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Joseph Karaki, Western States Engineering and Construction,'733 North Main Street, Orange, stated he is the architect for the project. He agreed with the conditions. ' Commissioner Stewart asked what it would do to the' operation if the City Council were to make a determination that beer and wine may not be sold. She also asked if there would be any public payphones outside of the building. Michael Brewer, 41715 Enterprise Circle North, #208, Temecula, stated he is the applicant's alcoholic beverage consultant. He noted that beer and wine sales only represent about 10 percent of their overall store sales, but it is an essential ingredient in order to be competitive in the market place to have the full offering of products a customer expects in a convenience store because they would lose the associated gas sales and convenience store sales for any customers who want to purchase beer and wine. He said it could have significant financial impacts on the viability of the project. Commissioner McPhail noted that the project is conditioned to include special landscape features including meandering sidewalks but the plans show a curb-adjacent sidewalk along Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. She asked if there would be a problem with providing the required landscape amenities. Mr. Brewer indicated there would not. James Martin, 6527 Mimosa Place, Rancho CuCamonga, stated he was present to speak in opposition to the proje~ as a whole. He said he was in opposition when the land was rezoned. He felt it was essentially taken from the residents of the Victoria Planned Community and given to a developer to market. He thought approval of a mini-mart is unnecessary with respect to what has already been approved in the area. He stated a Ralph's center and a mini-market are under construction. He observed there had been discussion regarding the sale of beer and wine and he noted there is a bar less than 1/4 mile away. He did not feel there should be four points for a person to buy alcohol in such a small area. He asked that if the Commission were to approve the project, that it make a strong recommendation to the City Council to deny the issuance of a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. He commented that staff, in particularly Mr. Granger, had been wonderful in responding throughout the project. He also expressed appreciation to the developer for conducting a neighborhood meeting. He felt the use is not necessary. Hesaidthatoneoftheitems raised in the neighborhood meeting was with respect to public safety and security. He believed mini- marts are an attractive nuisance and ara known to have problems with gang activity and cdme activity. He stated Police have stated that reini-markets are one of their major uses of concam. He noted this mini-mart would have easy on and off access to the freeway and he felt it would be inappropriate. Mr. Martin raised concerns regarding traffic. He said he has been a resident of the area since June 1985. He noted the realignment of Highland Avenue necessitated by the freeway created a comer that drivers take much too fast and screeching tires ara constantly heard. He acknowledged that the Traffic Department determined the numbers do not indicate there is a problem, but he felt one accident is too many and stated there have been at least 10 accidents or near accidents; i.e., people missing the turn and driving into the dirt, since he moved there. He noted the proposal calls for two lanes from Day Creek East merging to one and a left turn pocket at the easterly entrance. He said that means there will be cars stacking there waiting for westeHy traffic Planning Commission Minutes -4- February 11, 2004 to go by with eastedy traffic trying to merge into one lane and he felt there will be accidents caused by that coupled with cars coming out of the western exit illegally trying to make a left hand tum. He requested a hard median to prohibit a left turn coming out of the westerly drive access. He appreciated the condition to landscape the south side of Highland Avenue and asked for an opportunity to review the landscape plans. He believed mature trees should be there, as theywould be there if the original landscaping had been left in place. He noted Victoria residents pay every year into the landscape and street lighting districts that would have covered the maintenance of the property that effectively was relocated from the south side of Highland Avenue to the north side. He said there was originally an open drainage culvert along the block wall with a large parcel of land to the north, which had grass and trees. He stated those trees would be mature today if they had been allowed to grow. He thought the area should be a park because the alignment of Highland Avenue took out the grassy area. He thought the landscaping should have been put on the north side because they have been paying into the Landscape Maintenance District. He opposed a 24-hour operation because he did not want to hear sirens from Police being called there in the middle of the night. He believed the photometric study addressed the lighting from the canopy but not the security lighting or reflective lighting. Mark McCullough, 6553 Mimosa Place, Rancho Cucamonga, concurred with Mr. Harris. He asked why the project should be developed all. He stated there have been a tot of changes in the area; i.e., the freeway, Day Creek Boulevard, and Ralph's, and those changes have brought a lot of noise. He said a service station is being installed on the northwest comer and he asked why another one is needed. Tim Wallace, 6520 Myrtle Court, Rancho Cucamonga, agreed with Mr. Harris. He asked why a concrete divider is required on the west side of Highland Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard for the convenience store and Ralph's but there is not one being required here. He felt that if this development goes in, a median would reduce the traffic trying to come out and turn east on Highland Avenue. He noted there is not atum pocket in the area. He appreciated the developer's willingness to lower the pad. He felt that the project would generate noise after midnight and that would be an inconvenience to the residents who live on the south side of Highland Avenue. Edwin Villaromen, 6561 Palo Verde Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the proposed gas station would be in front of his bathroom windows. He said he now knows when the bar closes because he hears engines revving and screeching tires. He thought the freeway noise is negligible compared with the traffic on Highland Avenue. He felt allowing the service station and mini-mart to operate 24 hours a day would create a security issue and an inconvenience from a noise issue. He believed truckers will stop there and it will become a 24-hour neighborhood because of the easy access to the freeway. He said the freeway noise subsides from 10:00 p.m. to 4:30 a.m. He commented that when he bought his home 2 1/2 years ago, there was a perimeter wail on the side of Highland Avenue that the builder did not disclose would have an opening and he was concerned it would be a security and noise issue. He said he called the City and spoke to Brad Bullet and he got mitigations and what he wanted because it made sense. He believed Rancho Cucamonga is better than other cities and he expressed faith the Commissioners would look at the development from the perspective of the residents. Brett Holiday, 6591 Palo Verde Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated many families on Palos Verde Place don't know about the project because the notification only went to properties within 300 feet of the project. He said that Palo Verde Place is on an incline so that he has an unobstructed view of the project from the ground up. He believed that even with recessed lighting, it would be a glowing temple at the end of his street of a gas station and mini-mart. He said he did not want to look at it every day and he felt it is aesthetically insensitive. He believed every homeowner on Palo Verde Place would oppose the project. Travis England, 6573 Palo Verde Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was opposed to the project. He believed the lighting would shine on the entire street because the pumps are going to be open Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 11, 2004 with the back of the market against Day Creek Boulevard. He also was concerned regarding security. He said he has two toddlers and he feared the bar would close at 1:30 a.m. and patrons will drive to the mini-mart and hang out at the service station and buy more beer and wine. He asked that mature 20-40 foot palms be required if the project is approved. Candice Fowler, 13205 Catalpa Street, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the project. She felt there are not enough service stations on the east side of the City. She said that stretch of the street is very dark at night and she believed light from the project would help. She noted there will be another service station on the opposite comer and did not feel this one will add any additional burden for anyone. She felt the City needs the revenue and a freeway on and off ramp is a perfect place for a service station. She said she could empathize with the residents as she too has development next to her house dght now and it is not fun having construction there. She believed it would help to heavily landscape on the south side of Highland Avenue and that would make it more beautiful. She ' thought it would not be a safe place for a park. She'agreed that the lighting must be sensitive to surrounding residents. She did not believe there is that much traffic on Highland Avenue. She indicated people could leave the bar and go to Ralph's and buy alcohol if that was their intention. She felt it would be a benefit to have more services at the east end of the City. Gary Schwary, 2243 North Palm Way, Upland, stated he is a Planning Commissioner for the City of Upland. He stated he knows the developer because he has a service station and carwash on the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Benson Avenue. He commented the business is always kept clean and is managed well with good security. He said the crime statistics are Iow for the location. He commented that the developer was held to strict development standards including lowering the elevations by 3 to 3 1/2 feet. He noted the developer lives in Upland and he felt the project would be managed well. Mike Singelyn, Lewis Retail Center, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, stated theyare selling the property. He said the developer has addressed all recommendations from the City and Lewis felt he is taking every step necessary to model the excellence that Rancho Cucamonga desires of other developers. Tony Dehbozorgi, Chief Financial Officer, Pacific Globe, LLC, 1639 West Foothill Boulevard, Upland, stated he sympathizes with the residents of the area. He said they have gone above and beyond everything asked of them by staff. He acknowledged there were concerns about the beer and wine and he said he was willing to consider other conditions regarding the off-site sale of beer and wine. He said they have been involved with service station/cer wash/shopping centers for over 20 years and the closest development to this area is Rancho Mobil off of Masi. He said he and a partner built that center and he feels it is one of the best stations in Rancho Cucamonga. He observed they sell beer and wine there and there have been no issues with loitering, theft, or security. He noted they have 24-hour surveillance cameras in all of their centers throughout southem California and have not had any security issues. He said he was willing to answer any questions. Vice Chairman McNiel noted there is a prohibition of the sale of beer and wine from 2:00 am. to 6:00 a.m. He commented there had been concerns raised about the 24-hour operation of the station. Mr. Dehbozorgi replied that it is necessary for any service station to be open 24 hours a day in order to remain in business. He requested the same conditions that were imposed on the development across the street, which will be operating in a few months. He also noted that oil companies would not tell them when they will deliver gas; therefore it is imperative that they be open 24 hours. Commissioner Stewart asked if the applicant would be willing to have on-site security personnel. Mr. Dehbozorgi responded affirmatively. He observed they will have 24-hour surveillance cameras all over the parking lot, around the drive thru for the fast food, inside, and outside under the Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 11, 2004 canopies. He said that if a secudty person were warranted from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., they would do so. Mr. Marlin questioned why the developer was given an opportunity to ~ebut public testimony at this time. Mr. Martin felt the developer had already made his presentation~ Vice Chairman McNiel stated earJier the project architect spoke. He said that anyone could sl~eak. Mr. Martin thought the testimony was essentially a rebuttal to the public testimony. Tamara Oberhauser, 6635 Palo Verde Place, stated she was'not within the notification area. She said her home is two doors away from the notification area and she felt her neighborhood would be greatly impacted. She indicated she heard of the headng from another neighbor who was coming ' and asked her if she planned to attend. She said slae had no information about'the development other than what she heard this evening. She asked that the Commission consider that there are other neighbors in the housing tract on Palo Verde Place and other streets in Victoria that might have similar concerns, as they will be seeing the structure every day as they drive or walk on the street. She asked that the Commission consider notifying all people who would have a view of the structure from their house. Hearing no further testimony, Vice Chairman McNiel dosed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher stated there were a lot of issues with the project and it appeared that the applicant diligently worked with staff to solve most of the issues. He noted a lot of conditions were attached to the project. He thought the applicant stepped up and tried to do the best he could with the development on this property. He said the City is sensitive to the concerns of the neighborhood and the use would be approved under a conditional use permit. He stated that a lot of the concems regarding after-hours noise, beer purchases could be reviewed at a future time if there are problems. He believed the applicant did a good job of trying to resolve most of the issues and he felt it is a good project. Commissioner Stewart noted the project is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and she presumed something would go there. She felt it would always be some sort of a service station, convenience store, or fast food because the parcel is limited in size and the access to it is somewhat problematic. She did not feel the parcel would lend itself to other uses. She indicated certain conditions are applied. She asked that a condition barring public telephones be included. She requested that security be placed on site, particularly from Friday through Sunday beginning at 8 p.m. She thought the hours could be worked out with staff. She felt the on-site secudty was necessary to address any issues of loitering because she felt cameras do not fully do the job. She observed the project requires a conditional use permit and noted that any issues resulting from the use can be brought before the Commission at any time for review and the Commission can rescind the permit. She thought the residents have some protection and stated she felt something would go on the comer. She was not convinced that there will be lighting problems but noted there will be some light in the area and she thought that might be good from a security standpoint. She said the Design Review Committee took pains to be sure the residents would not be unduly impacted. Commissioner McPhail stated the Design Review Committee worked with the applicant and staff to make it an attractive canter and to mitigate the noise. She concurred with Commissioner Stewart that something will go on the comer. She did not think it would be incompatible to have a service station on the comer. She supported the project. She stated that it does not help the cause to have a Planning Commissioner from another City lobby on behalf of an applicant. She observed the Commission is to be unbiased in its review of the project. Vice Chairman McNiel stated that the Commission is charged with acting in the best interest of the City at large although it is done neighborhood by neighborhood. He said that when he first came to Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 11, 2004 the City, there were a great number of service stations relative to the population at that time but the stations were virtually all on Foothill Boulevard and they are mostly gone now. He believed the City is in dire need of services for residents because the City now has a population of approximately 150,000 and is still growing. He felt freeway-adjacent service stations make sense. He thought that they are one of the least impactive freeway-adjacent uses if there is appropriate security. He believed it makes good planning sense. He said that staff does a terrific job of reviewing projects before they get to the Design Review Committee and the Committee checks everything, He had faith in the job that staff and the Commission did. He wanted to be sure the landscaping on the south side of Highland Avenue is very dense. He felt it is an appropriate project for the site. He asked that corrections be made during construction if anything was missed. He wanted to be sure it is the best and least intrusive project possible. Commissioner Fletcher did not feel it was appropriate to burden the applicant with a requirement for on-site security at this time and said he would prefer it come back to the Commission for a review in 3 to 6 months for a discussion of on-site security. He noted there would be employees and security cameras there 24 hours. He noted there a lot of service stations along the freeway that are not required to have on-site security and he preferred the matter be brought back for review. Commissioner Stewart stated she would not rescind her security motion as she thought it needs to be on site and said it had been done at other locations. She asked that a condition be added that the project be reviewed by the Planning Commission 6 months after opening, including crime statistics. Commissioner McPhail noted that some of the speakers requested,that the landscaping be reviewed and she asked that the landscaping plans be brought to the Design Review Committee as a Consent Calendar item. Brad Bullet, City Planner, clarified the conditions he heard the Commission request. He said he heard a request that there be no public telephones, that there be on-site security Fridays through Sundays from 8 p.m. and he suggested it be to 6:00 a.m. Commissioner Stewart agreed 6:00 a.m. would be acceptable. Mr. Buller indicated he heard a request that the project be reviewed 6 months after opening to review crime statistics of the property and surrounding neighborhood issues, and that the final landscape plan be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. He observed that the Commission had correctly stated that the project could be reviewed even before 6 months if there are issues. He said that the residents would need to produce the evidence that there is a problem and the Commission would then hold an evidentiary hearing. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McPhail, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 with the modifications listed by Mr. Buller. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MAClAS - carried The Planning Commission recessed from 8:20 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. D. ENVI~ JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A re( 3.33 acres of land into 16 single-family lots in Planning Commission Mira -8- February 11, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. ~ff- /,~ ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 AND THE ISSUANCE OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, FOR A GAS STATION WITH PUMP ISLAND CANOPY, AND A SINGLE BUILDING CONTAINING A 2,947 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE AND 2,504 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON 1.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1089-121-08 AND 1089-401-66. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Globe LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." ~ 2. On the 5th day of January 2004, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting, attended by 11 residents, to present the proposed project and obtain community feedback. ' 3. On the 11th day of February 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. The decision and environmental assessment represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this Council. 5. On April 7, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 7, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-22, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC April 7, 2004 Page 2 a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, with a total street frontage of approximately 893 feet and an average lot depth of approximately 150 feet, which is presently unimproved; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is the Route 210 Freeway, the property to the south is developed with single-family homes within the Victoria Community Plan, and the property to the west is under construction with a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant; and c. The application proposes the construction of a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant with a drive-thru lane, a Conditionally Permitted Use within the Victoria Community Plan; and d. The proposed building elevations meet the design goals of the General Plan and Development Code by exhibiting a high level of amhitectural design, incorporating stacked stone, score lines, a tower'feature, and decorative pavement; and e. The proposed project has adequate off-street parking for all proposed uses; and f. The proposed project has been designed with a pad elevation that is as Iow as possible, given the site constraints and engineering tolerances required, in order to minimize the impacts of the project on the existing single-family residences to the south; and g. The sUbject property is vacant and has been cleared, and does not contain any trees; and h. The site, located adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard, a major north-south arterial, and the east bound Route 210 Freeway onramp, is geographically and physically suitable to support the use of the property as a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant with a drive-thru lane, thereby meeting one of the Economic Development Policies of the General Plan by capturing highway oriented commercial uses that will serve residents and businesses in the immediate vicinity; and i. The existing grade of the project site sits higher than the adjoining public streets. The proposed project grading scheme has been designed with a pad elevation of 1,445.96. The pad elevation has been engineered to be as Iow as possible while still meeting the requirements of drainage and containment areas as required under the Water Quality Management Plan; and j. The project design includes light fixtures designed to confine the area of illumination to the project site. Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination to the project site. A lighting stbdy was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south. According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have O-foot candle illumination from the proposed project; and k. The project will generate a combined total of 200, two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station). The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000, two-way peak hour trips for retail land use; therefore, the project is below the threshold of the San Bemardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC April 7, 2004 Page 3 I I. The Citys Traffic Engineer determined a localized traffic ~mpact analys~s ~s not required based upon the trip generation rates. The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the project site and has determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant the construction of a median on Highland Avenue eas~ of Day Creek Boulevard. The City's Traffic Engineer has also evaluated the project design and determined that the proposed project and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant a right turn deceleration lane from the westbound side of Highland Avenue; and m. The application contemplates the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store. The sale of beer and wine is allowed in the Village Commercial District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, in.accordance with the zoning regulations of the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code. The proposed Conditional Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine for offsite consumption only (Type 20 ABC license). The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distribution of liquor by setting limits on the different types in each Census Tract. If an existing Type 20 ABC license is not available for purchase by the applicant, the applicant will be required to apply for a new Type 20 ABC license. Because of a moratorium on all new licenses within San Bemardino County, a determination of Public Convenience and Necessity (PON) will ultimately be required by the City Council prior to issuance of a new Type 20 ABC license, as governed by the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The sale of beer and wine for offsite consumption is a common business practice associated with gas station and convenience store uses; and ' n. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3, above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to all conditions of approval contained in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-22, attached hereto. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. James A. Martin Jr., the appellant, and Pacific Globe LLC, the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC April 7, 2004 Page 4 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Pacific Globe LLC and to Mr. James A. Martin Jr. at the addresses identified in City records. THE CITY OF i~AN Cfi 0 C UCA/'I ON GA Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DRAFT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 - A review of the federally required Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,180,000. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony regarding the application for funding and direct staff to prepare the final 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan, to be brought back for adoption at a subsequent City Council meeting. BACKGROUND Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) based on a formula that considers census data, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, the City will receive a grant allocation of $1,180,000, an increase of $10,000 more than our current program year. To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: 1. The development of viable, urban communities including decent housing and a suitable living environment; and 2. The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of Iow- and moderate- income. CDBG regulations require that at least 70 pement of all funds be directed to activities that benefit Iow- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 2004-2005 program year, approximately 80.9 percent will benefit Iow- and moderate-income persons. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2004-2005 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG) April 7, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS Each year the City receive, s applications for various eligible activities that far exceed our funding abilities. Because funding of the CDBG program is limited by the allocation the City receives from HUD, and how we distribute those funds is codified in federal regulations, the City simply cannot fund all application requests. The vast majority of funds recommended for distribution are carryover activities from prior year participation in the CDBG program. Two new activities are recommended for funding and these include the City Cultural Center and the historic preservation of the Etiwanda Railway Station. Those funds identified below in bold, refer to recommended amounts from 2004-2005 program year CDBG entitlements. Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement Program has been in existence since 1990. The program currently offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500 for Iow-income, owner-occupied, single family and mobile homes. Since the program's inception, we have received an overwhelming number of requests for assistance from both the single-family and mobile home community. Additionally, the Oldtimers Foundation Home Maintenance Program provides minor and emergency repair grants to seniors, Iow- and Iow- moderate income, and owner-occupied households. Staff recommends funding the City's Home Improvement Program $340,000 (including $300,000 in new funds, and $30,000 in revolving loan funds) and $10,000 to the Oldtimers Home Maintenance Program. Capital Improvement: The following activities are recommended for funding: · Sidewalk Grinding - Involves the grinding and repair and/or replacement of displaced sidewalks in qualified target neighborhoods. Staff recommends funding this activity $17,148. · Wheelchair Ramps - Retrofitting of existing intersection curbs to accommodate handicapped persons. Staff recommends funding this activity $17,148. Capital Facilities: The construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center. The Cultural Center will feature a state of the art theater focusing on performances for young audiences and families, a multi-purpose event venue, and a full service library with a programming emphasis on youth and literacy. The library's second floor will house the adult literacy program and the at risk youth program for children's literacy called "Back to Basics." It will feature a computer lab with linked associations to the West End EmploymentJBusiness Resource Center, which will serve as a job resource center. Funding for this activity will be specifically designated for construction of the library facility within the Cultural Center. The identified funding for this activity will include the reprogramming prior year funds totaling $68,190, and allocating an additional $396,167 of new entitlement funds, resulting in a total of $464,357 in CDBG funds available for this facility. Staff recommends funding this activity $396,167 in new funds and $68, 190 in reprogrammed funds. Historic Preservation: The preservation of the historic Etiwanda Railway Station. This will be accomplished through renovation for adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. The City has acquired the Etiwanda Railway Station and requests funds for demolition and debris removal of all outbuildings and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 2004-2005 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG) April 7, 2004 Page 3 sheds to begin the restoration and preservation of this locally historic property. Staff recommends funding this activity $50,000. Public Service: Federal regulations allow communities to allocate up to 15 percent of their entitlement to fund public service providers. Fifteen percent of our entitlement is $177,000, the public service groups recommend funding total $163,627 (13.9 percent or our entitlement). Proposed funding will maintain current year Subrecipient funding; no new public service activity funding is recommended. Public service activities include: Graffiti Removal, Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Homelessness and Food Assistance, Domestic Violence Shelter, Senior, Youth At-Risk, and Literacy programs. Staff recommends funding these activities $163,627. CORRESPONDENCE Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on March 22, 2004, as a one-eighth page display ad. Notice was also published in the La Voz newspaper. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet City Planner BB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - FY 2004-2005 CDBG Applications Exhibit "B" - FY 2004-2005 Draft GDBG Funding Exhibit "C" - FY 2004-2006 Draft Annual Action Plan March 24, 2004 FY 2004-2005 CDBG APPLICATIONS ~{~li~ $225,910 NO Change 100% 570.206(a)(1) NH 14.1 Prograrnedministration. ~il~i~t~di~g $17,148 Decrease 2.7% 570.201(c) 570.208(a)(1) LM.a NH 10.1 Programtameted tolowincome areas. ~m!~R~ps Decrease 2.7% 570.201(c) 570.208(a)(2 NH 12.1 Citywide program. $561,380 New 100% 570.201(c) 570.208(a)(1 ) LMA NH 12.2 Consolidated Plan scheduled activity; however, $500,000 New 1.2% 570.201(c) 570.208(a)(2) LMC SN 9.1 . Construction funds forllbra~. $50,000 New 100% 570.201(d) 570.208(b)(2) SB NH 13.1 Den~litlon of vadous structures to begin histodc prsservaedn of the depot site, Subtotal - Capital Improvement $1,145,676.00 ~l~i;0V/~i/~e~ ~r0~ ~ $300,000 No Change 100% 570.202(b) 570.208(a)(3) HA HA 4.1, Home improvements through loans and grants, NH 16.1 Revolving Loan receipt total $30,000, Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance $15,000 increase 9.6% 570.202(b) 570.208(a)(3) HA SN 8.1 Minor home repair program. Subtotal - Home ;,,~l,i,,~,,~i~ $315,000.00 ~ffl~;~ $15,727 Decrease 9.4% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(1) LMA NH 16.2 Programtargetedtolowincorne areas. IFHMB - Fair Housing $15,387 Increase 5% 570.206(c) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 ~'irmativaiy further fair housing. IFHMB - Landlord/Tenant $10,011 Increase 5% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Mediation, referral, & education. Homeless Outreach, Programs, & Education $12,500 Increase 6.7% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC HMLS 7.1, Referral. suppor[, and educational services for NH 11.1 the homeless and economically disadvantaged, Foothill Family Shelter $7,500 Increase 2.8% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC HMLS 7.1, Short-term shaiter and supgerl to homeless NH 11.1 families. House of Ruth $12,737 Increase 7.9% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC HMLS 7.1, Assist battered ~.~men ~lh shsiter, education. NH 11.1 and aaif-sufficiency. Pomona-Inland Valley Council of Churches - $17,000 Increase 7.02% 570,201(e) 570,208(a)(2) LMC HMLS 7.1, Emergancy food assistance. SOVA NH 11.1 YWCA - Y-Teen $11,541 Increase 3.6% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Affer-schcol actaiiti6s to a'~,ei d health- threatening behavlom, Discontlrtue funding for failure to meet Actlo~ Plan goals, YMCA West End Kids Club $7,000 No Change 7% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Affer-SChoai recreatlo~ program. Your Own Club $5,000 No Change 36% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Affer-schoai recreation program. Senior Transportation $30,000 Increase 63% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Activity newly funged~n 01/~2. Proviges for tdge to and from RCSC, doctor visits, grocery shopping. Exhibit - Page 1 $12,000 No Change 2.5% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC SN 9.1, Senior citizen programs end parking lease. NH 11.1 ~ II~t~i~ NO Change 7% 570.201(e) NH 11.1 Yes-Fund proposed Cityprogram, (YOuth enrichment, spo~ts, recreation, & human ~ ~ $10,000 No Change 29% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Youth literacy p~ogram, Oldtimem Foundation - Senior Nutdtion $25,575 Increase 11% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC SN 9.1 Senior nutrition program lot RCSC & home Camp Fire USA $13,400 Increase 53% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Summer day camp program to develop skills, Project Sister $10,000 Increase 53.5% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC HMLS 7.1 Sexua~ assault and violence prevention. NH 11.1 Hope Through Housing Foundation $11,729 Increase 7% 570,201 (e) 570,208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Career development, education, & job treieins. Rising Sram of Equestrian Therapy Increase 100% 570.201(e) 570,208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Therapy through use of homes for mentally and Ci~ Ehfo~mb~t New 100% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 City Code Enromement function (1-full time & 1 Community investment Corporation New 28% 570.201 (e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11,1 Assist sma~l businesses to obteJn capital. Rebuilding Credit Services $20,000 New 21% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Assists in reestablishing a ~sitive consumer Baldy View Regional Occupational Program $8,000 New 100% 570.201(e) 570.208(a)(2) LMC NH 11.1 Refe~al services such as Job leads, job Subtotal - Public Service $486,607.00 TOTAL $1,890,244.00 ~i ~t§~ are City projects. HA = Housing Affordability; HMLS =Home[ess; SN = Special Needs; NH = Non-Housing Community Development Needs; CP Objectives are based upon the 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan. Exhibit 'A" - Page 2 March 24, 2004 6PM) FY 2004-2005 - DRAFT CDBG FUNDING Program Administration CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Sidewalk Gdnding $0.00 YES - Continue e~igible program. Wheelchair Ramps $0,00 YES - Continue eligible program. Devon Storm Drain $561,380,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0~00 NO- Insufficient funds. RC Cultural Center $500,000.00 $0.00 $68,190 $395,974.00 $464,164.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Etiwanda Railwa~y Station $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 YES - Fund eligible program. $0.00 $68,199.00 $548,460.00 HOME IMPROVEMENT ~~ Home Improvement Program $337~701.14 $324~233.00 $300r000.00 $41 ~064.53 $0.00 $300~000.00 $341 ~064.53 YES - Continue eligible program. Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 YES- Continue eligible program. PUSLIOSE,VIOES Subtotal ~ $315,000.00 ~ S310,000.00 $351,064.53 Graffiti Removal $20,000.00 $22,000.00 ~ ~ ~ $15~727.00 $0,00 $0.00 $15~920.00 $15,920.00 YES - Continue eligible program. IFHMB- Fair Housinq $12,000.O0 $12,000.00 $15~387.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12~000.00 $12~000.00 YES - Continue required program. IFH MB - Landlord/l'enant $9~977.00 $10~000.00 $10~011.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10t000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. HOPE $6~400.00 $6~400.00 $12~500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6~400.00 $6~400.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Foothill Family Shelter $3~000.00 $3r000.00 $7~500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51000.00 $51000.00 YES - Continue eligible progran~ House of Ruth $7~600.00 $7r600.00 $12~737.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,600.00 $7~600.00 YES - Continue eligible ,,~,Q ...... Pomona Valley Council of Churches (SOVA) $7,000.00 $7r000.00 $17r000.00 $0.00 $o.00 $71000.00 $7~000.00 YES - Continue eligible ~.,~ Y~NCA Y-Teen $7~000.00 $7~000.00 $11,541.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7t000.00 $7~000.00 NO - Failure to meet cllent goal. YMCA West End Kids Club $6~000.00 $6~000.00 $7~000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Your Own Club $5~000.O0 $51000.00 $51000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5t000.00 $51000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Senior Transportation $15~000.00 $15~000.00 $30~000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15~000.00 $15~000.00 YES - Continue eligible progcam. RC Community Services - Senior Proqrams $5~000,O0 $11,550.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12~000.00 $12~000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Norlhtown Collaborative - $12~000.00 $12~000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 $12~000.00 YES - Continue eligibte program. RC Library- Back to Basics $10,000.00 $10~000.00 $10~000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10~000.00 $10~000.00 YES - Continue elisible p¢ogram. Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition $8~500.00 $8~500.00 $25~575.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 $8~500.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Camp Fire USA $6~700.O0 $6~700.00 $13~400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6~700.00 $6~700.00 YEs - Continue eligible program. Project Sister $9~700.00 $9~700.00 $10~000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,700.00 $9~700.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Hope Through Housing Foundat on $5~000.00 $11~729,00 $0.00 $0.00 $51000.00 $5~000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy - $3~000.00 $5~000,00 ~ $0.00 $0.00 $3~000.00 $3~000.00 YES - Continue eligible program. City Code Epforcement - $114~500.00 ~ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NO - Insufficient funds. Community Investment Corporation $100~000,00 ~ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NO - lnsuffic~ent funds. Rebuilding Credit Services - $20~000.00 ~ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NO - Insufficient fund& Bald ~rmw Re ional Occu ation Pro ram ~ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NO-Insufficient funds. ~ Subtotal ~ $0.0__0 $153,020.0~0 $163,820.00 L.--- TOTAL $2 173,193.00 $41 064.53 $68 190.00 $1 180 000.00 $1 289 254.53 Exhibit "B" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2004-2005 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (JULY 1, 2004 TO JUNE 30, 2005) Draft April 7, 2004 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD-424) ....................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 RESOURCES AVAILABLE .................................................................................................................... 3 FEDERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................. ; ............................ 3 OTHER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 4 LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS ..................................................................................... 5 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAK~=N ........................................................................................................ 5 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ......................................................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVE 1 - CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE- FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ..................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVE 2 -- IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS .................................................................................. 6 OBJECTIVE 3 - PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING ........ 7 OBJECTIVE 4 - INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE .............. 8 OBJECTIVE 5 - REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING ............................................................................ 1 0 OBJECTIVE 6 - IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ......................................................................................................... 1 1 HOMELESS ......................................................................................................................... 1 1 OBJECTIVE 7 - ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS ..................................... 1 1 HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN ...................................................................................................12 SPECIAL NEEDS .................................................................................................................. 13 OBJECTIVE 8 - PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY ... 1 3 OBJECTIVE 9 - SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS ......................................................................................................... 13 SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ........................................................................................... 14 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ............................................................. 14 OBJECTIVE 10 - PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED ........................................................................... 14 OBJECTIVE 1 1 - ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS .................................................................................. 16 OBJECTIVE 1 2 - ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES OBJECTIVE 1 3 -- THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS ........................ 1 9 OBJECTIVE 14 -- PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE Community Developmen! Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN ..... 20 OBJECTIVE 15 - ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS .................................................................... 20 OBJECTIVE 16 -- REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHTAND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ............................. 21 OTHER ACTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 22 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .............................. ;~ .................................................................. 22 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ...................................................................... 23 OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER SERVED NEEDS ............................................................... 26 ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 26 ACTIONS TO REMovE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 26 ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS .................................... 26 ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES ...................... ; ................ 27 ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION .............. 27 PUBLIC HOU ,SING IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................... 27 MONITORING ....................................................................................................................... 27 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION .................................................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... A-1 FY 2004-2005 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ........................................... ',.A-1 APPENDIX "B" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS ........................ B-1 APPENDIX "C" - ATFACHMENTS ......................................................................................................C-1 SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, CENSUS BOUNDARIES, LoW/MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT ........................................................ C-1 SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE, GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS ................................. C-1 LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS ..................................................................................... C-1 CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................ C-1 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM HUD-424) The Application for Federal Assistance (2 pages) will be inserted into the final report. Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 2004-2005 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for Iow- and moderate-income persons. RESOURCES AVAILABLE · FEDERAL RESOURCES Community Development Block Grant Federal funding available to the City are allocated through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") CDBG program. During the 2004-2005 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $1,180,000, which is $10,000 more than fiscal year 2003-2004. CDBG funds reprogrammed from prior year activities are $109,254.53, which provides $1,289,254.53 available for funding program activities (see Appendix "A"). IncJuded within the total of funds reprogrammed prom prior year activities is $ 30,000 in program income the City received during the 2003-2004 program year; this program income is functionally a revolving loan fund tied to the City's Home Improvement Program. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates 170 Section 8 housing units and 16 public housing units located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority are primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing programs. County of San Bemardino, Department of Economic and Community Development The County receives federal funds to implement the HOME Consortium, which the City joined in July 1995. In 1999 the City renewed their commitment to the HOME Consortium by signing a 3-year Cooperation Agreement covering the period from October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2002. The City will be renewing the 3-year agreement to cover the period from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2005. The County operates four programs through the HOME Consortium that include the HOME Homeownership Assistance Program ("HAP"), HOME Tenant Based Assistance ("TBA") Program, HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, and the HOME Community Housing Development Organization Program. The County allocation for these programs total $ 5,132,797 and includes funds for program administration. These programs are all available to City residents on a first-come first- serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium. The Homeownership Assistance, Tenant Based Assistance, and Rental Property 3 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Acquisition and Rehabilitation programs are discussed under specifl(~ activities in the Consolidated Plan. The Community Housing Development Organization ("CHDO") Set-Asic~e program is not identified and therefore warrants further discussion. The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside frem the County HOME Consortium and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored, or owned by non-prefits that have been certified as CHDO's. The CHDO pregram functions as a souree of funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or project type within the County; however, recipient income cannot exceed 80% of the County medium family income. HOME funds are available to eligible residents citywide on a first-come first-serve basis threugh the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,523,717 allocated to the CHDO program. · OTHER RESOURCES City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20% of tax increment revenue for increasing and impreving the community's supply of Iow- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005, appreximately $ 39 million will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Pereent Set-, Aside during the reporting period is projected to be $ '10,080,292. The Agency's tax increment has been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is little unobligated funding available. In July 1996, the Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") appreved the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southem California Housing Development Corporation ("SCHDC") and Northtown Housing Development Corporation ("NHDC"). On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $ 37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: · A pledge agreement threugh the year 2025 was signed with SCHDC where $ 3.9 million will be previded annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the prevision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $ 790,000 of the annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a pregram is not developed, the funds will be available for any RDA housing pregram. · A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where $1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $ 5 million in net bond preceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond preceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots, acquisition and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge 4 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga amount will be $1.4 million through the year 2025. · LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS The primary source of fund leveraging will occur in conjunction with activities carried out through RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds. This is accomplished through public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as the NHDC and the SCHDC. Other potential soumes for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAI~EN · AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted, at-risk units. The SCHDC, with pledge assistance from the RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds obtained replacement financing for several complexes within the City. The SCHDC owns and manages the complexes, and the RDA monitors the affordability covenants checking quarterly to ensure units are rented according to the agreement and the occupants comply with established income categories. Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with funding assistance by the City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur in the Redevelopment target area, however, units may be acquired citywide. Resources: Bonds issued by the RDA and a loan from the California Housing Finance Authority ("CHFA") were used to provide long-term replacement financing for 4 SCHDC affordable housing complexes. A 1996-97 RDA tax allocation bond issue provided approximately $ 30 million for replacement financing. An annual pledge of $ 3.9 million of Agency Housing funds provides bond debt service and project reserve funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There are currently 5 apartment complexes, containing 1,145 total units with 553 held as affordable. Monterey Village and Mountainside Apartments were acquired in FY 95-96 and Sycamore Springs and Rancho Verde Apartments were acquired in FY 96-97. Dudng the 2002-2003 program year, SCHDC completed the Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments, a 49 unit senior apartment complex, which holds 100% of the units affordable. No units are proposed during the 2004-2005 program year. Community Deve/opment Block Grant 2004-2005 Annua/ Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Complex Total Units Affordable Units I Sycamore Springs 240 96 Mountainside Apartments 384 192 Monterey Village Apartments 224 112 Rancho Verde Apartments 248 104 Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments 49 49 Total 1,145 553 Program 1.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. Activity 1.2.1: The NHDC anticipates rehabilitating one unit during the 2004-2005 program year. When rehabilitation does occur the NHDC is the owner/developer of the rehabilitated lots, which are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This program is also part of the NHDC's First- Time Home Buyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to Iow- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.~3, Activity 4.3.1 .) OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program 2.1: Construction of affordable (multi-family) units. Activity 2.1.t: The NHDC is building the Olen Jones Senior Apartments, which will contain 96 apartments (including one for the manager); 15 units will be restricted to persons earning 35% of the median income, 28 apartments will be restricted to persons earning 45% of the median income, and 52 apartments will be restricted to persons earning 50% of the area median family income. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: 7125 Amethyst Avenue. Resources: The estimated cost of the project is $12,000,000. Of this amount the RDA contributed $ 5,070,000, and the County HOME Consortium contributed $1,300,000. The NHDC also received a 4% state and federal tax credit (roughly $ 4,000,000). The developer contributed the remaining balance. Accomplishments and Time Frame: This project is currently under construction is expected to be completed on April 5, 2004. Program accomplishments will be reported in the 2003-2004 CAPER. 6 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in Iow- and moderate-income neighborhoods, Activity 2.2.1: The NHDC does not anticipate the construction of any new homes during the program year. When lots are available within the Northtown target neighborhood, new homes are constructed and made available to families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income. The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infill lots; however, these lots are purchased with assistance from the RDA. This program is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to Iow- and moderate- income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1 .). Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: The NHDC leveraged RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing,Program and permanent first-modgages from Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There are no new units proposed for the 2004-2005 program year. OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance. Activity 3.1.1: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City when applying for Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rates. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide. Resources: Federal Housing and Urban Development funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing and 170 Section 8 applications. 7 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 3.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) program. I Activity 3.2.1: The Tenant Based Assistance ("TBA") program is offered through the County HOME Consortium and is available to eligible residents. The County has designed the program to provide assistance not only to those who meet federal preferences, but also to those who met a "special need." The County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,500,000 allocated to this program. This includes $ 500,000 in monthly rental assistance and $ '1,000,000 in security ' deposit assistance. Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga so that approximately 6 households could receive assistance by June 30, 2005. OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. Activity 4.1.'1: The RDA is administering a Home Buyer program using down payment assistance loans. The loan is 10% of the purchase price up to a maximum of $ 80,000. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 45 years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga RDA. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: RDA Set-Aside funds: $ 800,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, assist 10 homebuyers. Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 4.2: Participate in the County HOME consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers. Activity 4.2.1: The County of San Bemardino operates the Homeownership Assistance Program ("HAP") in which households earning less than 80% of the median family income may receive assistance in the purchase of a first home. The HAP provides a silent second trust deed program for Iow- income homebuyers. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. In addition, the HOME Consortium will receive $ 439,778 in federal funds under the American Dream program, which promotes home ownership. Accomplishments ,and Time Frame: The City wili work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga so that approximately 4 households could receive assistance by June 30, 2005. Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. Activity 4.3.1: The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to Iow- and moderate-income homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC does not plan to complete the construction of any new homes during the program year (see Affordable Housing, Objective 2, Program 2.1, Activity 2.1.1). When lots are available, newly constructed homes are typically sold to income- eligible homebuyers earning between 80% and 90% of the area median family income. When rehabilitated homes are utilized (see Affordable Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1) the rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning up to 60% of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. The NHDC plans on the rehabilitation of one unit dudng the program year. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the RDA that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, the sale or lease of 1 rehabilitated home. OBJECTIVE 5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income homeowners. Activity 5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80% of the area median family income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $ 30,000 and grants of up to $ 7,500, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors, overSees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient results. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 341,064.53. (Includes $ 30,000 in revolving loan funds, and $11,064.53 in pdor year funds). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, assist 40 households with incomes below 80% of the area median family income. Program 5.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation Program. Activity 5.2.1: This is a program is available to residents of local projects through the County HOME Consortium. HOME funds are available for Iow interest loans to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental property in exchange for affordable rental units. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $ 25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to Iow- and very-low income residents. This program also provides funding for the refinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family units. Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, Department of Economic and Community 10 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Development, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 2004-2005 program year. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 6: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Program 6.1: Support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal Comprehensive Grant funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing applications. · HOMELESS OBJECTIVE 7: ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 7.1: Continue to support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity 7.1.1: The City currently provides assistance to a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and shod-term shelter. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: Homeless Outreach, Pro.qrams, and Education ("HOPE"): This agency provides assistance to individuals and families who are or are at-risk of homelessness and include such services as advocacy, education, shelter vouchers, and referrals. HOPE is located at 213 North Fern Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. 11 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They ara located at 1501 West Ninth Straet, Suite D, and at 230, 238, and 294 North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for batterad women and their children who ara at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24~hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24- hour cdsis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outraach offices, and childran programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claramont, CA 91711. Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hun.qer Program ("SOVA"): SOVA offers a 5- day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. $OVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontado, CA 91761. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · HOPE: $ 6,400. · Foothill Family Shelter: $ 5,000. · House of Ruth: $ 7,600. · SOVA: $ 7,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, assist the following: · HOPE- 150 persons. · Foothill Family Shelter- 10 families. · House of Ruth - 1,600 persons. · SOVA - 1,280 persons. · HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN The City's goal is to develop a comprahensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of cara with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that ara able to provide the first line of defense in providing outraach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and raferral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who ara at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. 12 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga · SPECIAL NEEDS OBJECTIVE 8: PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY. Program 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low- and moderate- income seniors. Activity 8.1.1: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to Iow- and moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $100 per visit, and in emergency situations, the allowance of a one- time material charge for up to $ 250. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, Oldtimers Foundation will assist 70 Iow- and moderate-income households. OBJECTIVE 9: SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Program 9.1: Support special need services in areas where there are significant under-served needs. Activity 9.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. To meet additional parking needs for the facility, the City entered into a 5-year lease to utilize the parking lot of an adjacent facility. In return for the use of the parking facility the City will provide monthly rant, maintenance, and improvements to the parking area. The use of this parking lot is critical to the padicipation of senior citizen residents utilizing Senior Center programs. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Route. 13 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga Resources: CDBG funds: $12,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, to have assisted 550 persons through these activities. · SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identifyactions the City intends to take over the next program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs. · NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OBJECTIVE 10: PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED. Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvemen{s in qualified target areas. Activity 10.1.1: The City will fund the following public improvement projects: Sidewalk Gdndin.q and Replacement in Identified Tarqet Nei.qhborhoods: Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; CT 20.01, BG 4. Resources: CDBG funds: · Sidewalk Grinding: $17,148. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, replace approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk. Program 10.2: Complete rehabilitation improvements to the Senior Center, including expansion, interior rehabilitation, project landscaping, and handicap improvements. Activity 10.2.1: Funding previously allocated for improving the landscaping at the existing Senior Center was reprogrammed to Program 10.5, Activity 10.5.1 for the construction of a new Senior Center. As reported in the 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan, funding for expansion and rehabilitation 14 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga improvements to the Senior Center was reprogrammed to Program 10.5, Activity 10.5.1 for the construction of a new Senior Center facility. Program 10.3: Develop a Fire Safety Awareness Program. Activity 10.3.1: No funding is proposed for the 2004-2005 program year. Program 10.4: Evaluate the development of a new community/recreation facility in either the Southwest Cucamonga or Norfhtown target neighborhoods. Activity 10.4.1: No funding is proposed for the 2004-2005 program year. Program t0.5: Evaluate the development of a new Senior Center and provide funding to assist in its construction. Activity 10.5.1: Funding for this activity was banked over several years to assist in the construction of a new senior center facility. The facility is currently under construction and should be completed in October 2004. No new funding is proposed for the 2004-2005 program year. Program 10.6: Evaluate the development of a job center located in the southwest Cucamonga area and provide funding to assist in its implementation. Activity 10.6.1: The proposed job center would assist Iow-income individuals by providing a safe and central place to seek employment opportunities and services such as English as a Second Language. The request includes leasing of the office trailer, preparation of the project site, utilities, and bathroom rentals. No new funding is proposed for the 2004-2005 program year. Program 10.7: Assist in the development of a new library at the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center and provide funding to assist in its construction. Activity 10.7.1: The Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center features a state of the art theater focusing on performances for young audiences and families, a multi-purpose event venue and a full service library with a programming emphasis on youth and literacy. The library's second floor will house the adult literacy program and the at-risk youth program for children's literacy called "Back to Basics." It will also feature a computer lab with linked associations to the West End Employment / Business Resource Center, which will serve as a job resource center. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Geographic Location: The Cultural Center will be located at 11505 Cultural Center Drive. 15 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Resources: CDBG funds: $ 464,164. I (Includes $ 395,974 in new CDBG funds, and $ 68,190 reprogrammed funds). I Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, provide funding to assist in construction of the new Cultural Center. OBJECTIVE 11: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord- tenant mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters, domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy programs. Activity 11.1.1: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include: Fair Housing: The City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board for Fair Housing services that include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontado, CA 91762. Landlord Tenant Mediation: The City contracts with Inland Mediation Board for Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762.. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24- hour cdsis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Pomona Valley Council of Chumhes - West End Hun.qer Proqram ("SOVA"): SOVA offers a 5- day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. YWCA - Y-Teen: Provide personal development and societal betterment after-school activities to Iow- and Iow-moderate income youth at-risk in a nurturing environment as alternatives and diversions from health threatening and risk-taking behaviors. This program is currently being conducted at the Mountain View Apartments, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue. YWCA of the West End is located at 600 North Park Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768. YMCA - West End Kids Club: Offered to students from Iow-income families attending Bear Gulch School. This activity provides an after-school recreational program. West End YMCA is 16 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. YMCA - Your Own Club: The program is run at the Old Town Park and is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood in CT 21, BG 6 & 7. The program is designed to provide at-risk middle school agedyouth with fun, educationally enriching and challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition: The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Rancho Cucamonqa Public Library- Back To Basics: The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. YMCA - Senior Tral3sportation: Provide transportation for senior citizens to and from the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, as well as local grocery stores, for weekly shopping. Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Camp Fire USA: Camp.Nawakwa is located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bernardino Mountains. The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn responsibility, develop skills, and gain confidence in themselves while building independence and self-reliance. Campfire Boys and Girls is located at 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite 208C, Montclair, CA 91763. Project Sister: Project Sister is a sexual assault and violence prevention program. The program works with teens addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness. The program also targets seniors, who are vulnerable to being victims of crimes including sexual assault, robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. The program offers 24-hour counseling, and individual and group counseling as needed. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711. Rancho Cucamonqa Community Services Department - Northtown Collaborative: The Northtown Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program that will provide essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. This is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Cucamonga Middle School and NHDC. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Hope Throu.qh Housinq Foundation: Hope Through Housing provides opportunities in the areas of career development, education, and jobs, while empowering participants with current technology. Hope's parent organization is SCHDC, which operates the apartment complexes identified in Activity 1.1.1. The program will focus on the residents of Rancho Verde Village, 17 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Monterey Village, Sycamore Springs, Mountainside Apartments, and their surrounding neighborhoods. Hope Through Housing will operate out of Rancho Verde Village apartments, 8837 Grove Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. / Risin,q Stars of Equestrian Therapy (RSET): Provides therapeutic, recreational, and instructional horse riding to persons of all ages, with the primary emphasis on those with physical and mental disabilities. The program includes therapeutic exercise, development of fine motor skills, auditory commands, and equine husbandry. RSET is located at 8401 Bella Vista, Rancho , Cucamonga, CA 91701. ,. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · Fair Housing: $12,000. · Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $10,000. · Houseof Ruth: $ 7,600. · SOVA: $ 7,000. ~ · YWCA: $ 7,000. · YMCA- WEKC: $ 6,000. ~ · YMCA-YOC: $ 5,000. · Senior Nutrition: $ 8,500. · Back To Basics: $10,000. · YMCA- Senior Transportation: $15,000. · Campfire Boys and Girls: $ 6,700. · Project Sister: $ 9,700. · Northtown Collaborative $12,000. · Hope Through Housing $ 5,000. · RSET $ 3,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, assist the following: Fair Housing- 388 persons. · Landlord/Tenant-228 households. House of Ruth - 1,600 persons. · SOVA- 1,258 persons. · YWCA- 60 youth. · YMCA- WEKC - 95 youth. · YMCA - YOC - 40 youth. · Senior Nutrition - 570 seniors. · Back To Basics- 132 persons. · YMCA- Senior Transportation - 3,700 seniors. · Campfire Boys and Girls- 20 youth. · Project Sister- 980 persons. · Northtown Collaborative- 3,200 persons. · Hope Through Housing- 145 persons. 18 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga · RSET-40 persons. OBJECTIVE 12: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES. Program 12.1: Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns. Activity 12.1.1: This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $17,148. Accomplishments 'and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. Program 12.2: Complete handicap accessibility requirements at other eligible public recreation facilities, including Old Town Park. Activity 12.2.1: This activity was canceled at the request of the Engineering Division and all remaining funds ($ 68,190) were reprogrammed to the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center activity. OBJECTIVE 13: THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS. Program 13.1: The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary emphasis on residential assistance. Activity 13.1.1: The preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Railway Station. The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for adaptive as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. It is anticipated that this activity will be a multi- year program, requiring additional CDBG funds in future program years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The Etiwanda Railway Station is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 50,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, complete the demolition and debris removal of all outbuildings and sheds to begin the restoration and preservation of this locally 19 Community Development Block Grant 2004~2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga historic property. OBJECTIVE 14: PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the CDBG program. Activity 14.1.1: Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $ 225,910. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, complete all administrative and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. OBJECTIVE 15: ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS. Program 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate economic development. Activity 15.1.1: Review and evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. The City has formed a task force to review the planning and land use issues along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Approximately 6 miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The City's Foothill Boulevard 20 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga and Economic Task Force reviewed existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and developed standards for softscape improvements that will occur within the street right-of-way. These improvements will include signage, street furniture, landscaping, etc, to establish a unified street theme. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop, and through public improvements where the street frontage is currently improved. The purpose of the Visual Imprevement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will help guide a balanced and unified pattern of street~cape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the historic Route 66 as well as a historic Rancho Cucamonga. Through June 30, 2005, continue analysis and implementation of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. OBJECTIVE 16: REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE. Program 16.1: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, and code enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Activity 16.1.1: The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which, through the course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed. Lead Agency: City.of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home Improvement Program. (See Objective 5, Program 5.1, Activity 5.1.1.). Program t6.2: Continue funding the Graffiti Removal Program. Activity 16.2.1: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents of graffiti. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, and 7, and CT 20.01, BG 4. 21 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Resources: CDBG funds: $15,727. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, remove approximately 14,999 square feet of graffiti. OTHER ACTIONS ' · ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ," The RDA Implementation Plan for 2000-2005 includes a section on "Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to strengthen the economic environment Of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is accomplished through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of Rancho Cucamonga's existing businesses, to attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-term employment to strengthen and compliment the economy of the City. Economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents and businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic development activities focus on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the RDA has successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the strategic plan that have levereged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and Intemet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition. Despite this success and recognition, the RDA continues to work to attract businesses that fit the general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in the area. The City will continue with these economic development efforts during the 2003- 2004 program year. The RDA's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected employment, expansion, and the local tax base. From 1994-2001, more that 80 companies expanded and/or relocated creating more than 5,300 new jobs because of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the Agency's marketing and promotional efforts, the Agency has managed to facilitate that growth. Apart from the specifics of the Economic Development strategy, the Agency assists companies through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center ("SBDC"), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation including, business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement assistance, environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. The results of the SBDC during the past year were outstanding. Over 179 local businesses were assisted, 244 new jobs were created, and many other jobs have been retained. The SBDC has also assisted in securing $1.5 million in new financing for small businesses. In 2001, the California Redevelopment Association ("CRA") awarded the RDA its "CRA 22 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Ac'don Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Award of Excellence" in the category of Education, Marketing, and Promotions for interactive site seamh web site (INside Rancho). · AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING In 1984, the City began contracting with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board ("IFHMB') to provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing, Program assures that there ara no impediments to fair housing choices. Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site (http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html). Enforcement is provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB, or a related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the community. In May 1996, the City completed a five-year Fair Housing Analysis of impediments. Dudng the 2001-2002 program year the City contracted with Cotton/Bridges/Associates to prepare an update to the Analysis of Impediments. The update was be completed by adopted by the City Council on December 4, 2002. While the Al identifies a number of potential issues, certain issues are beyond the ability of a local jurisdiction to address, such as those related to lending practices. The actions identified below represent those that can be feasibly addressed by the City. Expanding Affordable Housin.q Opportunities Housing affordability alone is not necessarily a fair housing issue. However, when housing affordability issues interact with other factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, and race/ethnicity, fair housing concerns may adse. Moreover, the fair housing equation has two sides. One the one side is the availability of a range of housing choices and on the other side is equal access to those choices. Therefore, a community must ensure that it has a range of housing choices to meet the various needs of all income segments in the community. Action '1: The City will continue to provide homeownership opportunities in the community by promoting the First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City will focus outreach effods towards lower income households, particularly to Black, Hispanic, and Asian households, since they have more difficulty obtaining financing. Specifically the City will provide advertisements and workshops in both Spanish and English to inform residents about this program. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 2: The City will continue to facilitate the development of housing for all income 23 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga groups within the community. The City will focus on facilitating affordable housing development through a combination of financial and regulatory assistance. Specifically, the City will work to provide affordable housing throughout the community, avoiding an over- impaction of specific neighborhoods. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 3: The City will develop a monitoring system of the Redevelopment Agency's lending practices for the First Time Homebuyer Program, as this program is not subject to HMDA. Time Frame: By 2004. Rehabilitation Assistance Action 4: The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for owner-occupied and investor-owned single-family housing in the community. Existing programs include the Home Improvement Grant, Deferred Payment Loan Program, and the Emergency Home Improvement Grant. The City will ensure that information about these programs be provided in the City's brochures, advertisements, and website in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 5: The City will ensure that Spanish speaking staff is available to assist residents in the City regarding code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and other housing services. Time Frame: Ongoing. Action 6: The City will continue to rahabilitate substandard multi;family housing in the community. Time Frame: Ongoing. Access to Information Action 7: The City will work to expand its website to provide additional links to housing services and resources, such as a link to the fair housing service provider and a link to the Fannie Mae Foundation which offers free guides and resources for first-time home buyers in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: By 2004. 24 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Policies and Programs Action 8: The City will provide developers with federal fair housing guide information regarding accessibility requirements as pad of the land use entitlement process. In addition, the City may consider incorporating accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement process. Time Frame: By 2004. Action 9: The City will continue to pursue affordable housing development programs identified in the 2000-2004 Housing Element. To the extent feasible, the City will facilitate the development of housing affordable to lower and moderate-income households ,according to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation identified in the Housing Element. Time Frame: By 2004. Outreach to Lenders Action 10: The City will work with local lenders and government institutions to provide outreach to lower income residents about government-backedfinancing. The City will encourage local lenders to provide information in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: By 2004. Action 11: The City will encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to hold homebuying workshops in Rancho Cucamonga by local lending institutions. These workshops should be held in both English and Spanish. Time Frame: Workshops will be conducted on an annual basis. Action 12: The City will explore regional effort to study predatory lending issues and support state and federal initiatives to address predatory lending practices. Time Frame: Discuss with the fair housing se/vice provider a regional study of predatory/ending in 2002 and ongoing support of anti-predatory/ending initiatives. Fair Housing Services Action 13: The fair housing service provider will continue to conduct fair housing workshops for residents, apartment owners, and property managers. The City will encourage the fair housing service provider to coordinate with the real estate associations regarding fair housing training. Time Frame: Provide training at least once a year. 25 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga HMDA Monitorin,q Action '14: The fair housing service provider will monitor complaints regarding unfair~ lending, and assess lending patterns using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data (HMDA) and other data sources. Time Frame: Monitor HMDA and other data on an annual basis. Action 15: The City will work with the fair housing service provider to ensure that an increased number of fair housing tests be performed in the City. Time Frame: Testing to be conducted pedodically. · OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage available funding. · ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. · ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. · ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of seven, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the RDA also follow the same guidelines. 26 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga · ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City is the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. Most of the activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local Iow-income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. · ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in tum will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. · PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. · MONITORING Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the CDBG program. Standards Utilized for Review · Is the program meeting intended objectives? · Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements? e Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner? 27 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Monitodnq Procedures I Construction Projects - All construction projects are expected to comply with federal ~abor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity / requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, pre-construction meetings, and ongoing project inspections. SubrecipientAgencies - All Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which the various scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must submit detailed information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City's monitoring goal is to conduct an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation ~ Plan. The following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation. 1. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on November 10, 2003. Copies of the notice were also mailed to approximately 43 individuals and organizations. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, City Library, Senior Center, and Lion's Center. 2. Notice regarding the 30-day review pedod and availability of the draft 2003-2004 Annual Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on March 22, 2004, and in La Voz on March 18, 2004. Letters providing notice of the public hearing and indicating documents availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. 28 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY 2004-2005 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN · PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of federal grant/entitlement funds, such as CDBG funds, for the purpose of meeting the goal of providing decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of Iow- and moderate-income. · PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAl. ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year strategy listing the projects, programs, and resoumes that will be utilized during the program year. During the 2004-2005 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $1,180,000, which is $10,000 more than fiscal year 2003-2004. CDBG funds reprogrammed from prior year activities are $109,254.53, which provides $1,289,254.53 available for funding new program activities. These funds will be used to support the following housing and community development activities. CDBG Administration Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $ 0.00 $ 225,910.00 $ 225,910.00 $ 225,910.00 Sidewalk Grinding Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $ 0.00 $17,148.00 $ t7,148.00 Wheelchair Ramps Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $ 0.00 $17,148.00 $17,148.00 RC Cultural Center Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $ 68,190.00 $ 395,974.00 $ 464,164.00 Etiwanda Railway Station Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $ 0,00 $ 50,000,00 $ 50,000.00 $58,190.00 $480,270.06 '---~-648,460.00 Home improvement Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $ 41,064.53 $ 300,000.00 $ 341,064.53 Home Maintenance Oldtimers Foundation $ 0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $41,064.53 $318,000.00 $35t ,064.53 Graffiti Removal Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $ 0.00 $15,g20.00 $15,g20.00 Fair Housing Inland Mediation Board $ 0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Landlord/Tenant Inland Mediation Board $ 0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Outreach Center HOPE $ 0.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 6,400.00 Emergency Shelter Foothill Fatuity Shelter $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Emergency Shelter House o1 Ruth $ 0.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 Food Distribution SOVA $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Y-Teen Program Y~NCA $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 A-1 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Privateer/ FY 20~0~5~ Total Avaii~6i~ Youth Activity YMCA-WestEndKidsOleh $9.99 Youth Activity YMCA - Your Own Club $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Senior Transportation West End YMCA , $ 0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Senior Programs Rancho Cucamonga Community Sen/ices $ 0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Human Services/Recreation Northtown Collaborative $ 0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Literacy Rancho Cucamonga Public Library , $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Food Distribution Oldtimers Foundation $ 0.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 8,500.00 Youth Activity Camp Fire USA $ 0.00 $ 6,700.00 $ 6,700,00 Sexual Assault Assistance Project Sister $ 0.00 $ 9,700.00 $ 9,700.00 Caraer/Education/Jobs Hope Through Housing Foundation $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 ~s/Recraafion Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy $ 0.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 l~! i $0.00 ,'156,820.00 S156,820.00 $109,254.53 $1,t80,000.00 $1,289,254.53 A-2 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX "S" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS · T~ese figures are not cumulative, but represent the number of units operated by the Housing Authority dudng the program year. HOUSING AFFORDABIUTY OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program t.'1: Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be held for future affordable housing. Program t.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW. AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program 2.1: Construction of affordable multi-family units. Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in Iow- and moderate- income neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for Section 8 and public housing assistance. Program 3.2: Participate in the Cgunty HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) program. OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE. B-1 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program. Program 4,2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers. Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer program. OBJECTIVE 5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely Iow-, Iow-, and moderate-income homeowners. Program 5.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation Program. OBJECTIVE 6: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Program 6.1: Support applications of the Housing Authority for their annual ' Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing residents. B-2 Community Development Block Grant 2004-2005 Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga APPENDIX "C" - ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, CENSUS BOUNDARIES, LOWL MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NoN-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS CERTIFICATIONS C-1 OIlS ~Sta~e mk ~ ax~ a5 s o ~n g fac hncs Need sm 2@~}4 Electio~ oas 57 C~tv held a 31 Please C~t~'s webs~te at: T H E C I T Y 0 F I~AN C H 0 C U CA M 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: April 7, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW BOARD MEMBER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub- Committee's recommendations for appointment of new Board member. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation currently has one vacancy on the Board due to the recent resignation of Wanda Mitchell. The Library Sub-Committee, at their meeting on March 31, considered the Library Foundation's request for appointment of Ron Sakala, Vineyard Bank and and now formally recommends his appointment to the vacant seat. ctfully sa bmitted, Deborah Kaye Clark '~) Library Director